ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2009 March (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2009
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 000-53149
SERVISFIRST BANCSHARES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware | 26-0734029 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
(205) 949-0302
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer, and small reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check
one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer þ | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practical date.
Class | Outstanding as of April 30, 2009 | |
Common stock, $.001 par value | 5,513,482 |
Table of Contents
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SERVISFIRST BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
MARCH 31, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008
(In thousands)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
MARCH 31, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008
(In thousands)
December 31, | ||||||||
March 31, 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | (Audited) | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 17,925 | $ | 22,844 | ||||
Interest-bearing balances due from depository institutions |
1,019 | 30,774 | ||||||
Federal funds sold |
88,751 | 19,300 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 107,695 | 72,918 | |||||
Securities available for sale |
105,260 | 102,339 | ||||||
Restricted equity securities |
3,241 | 2,659 | ||||||
Mortgage loans held for sale |
5,785 | 3,320 | ||||||
Loans |
1,023,893 | 968,233 | ||||||
Less allowance for loan losses |
(12,412 | ) | (10,602 | ) | ||||
Loans, net |
1,011,481 | 957,631 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net |
3,778 | 3,884 | ||||||
Accrued interest and dividends receivable |
3,934 | 4,026 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets |
4,528 | 3,585 | ||||||
Other real estate owned |
8,088 | 10,473 | ||||||
Other assets |
1,772 | 1,437 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,255,562 | $ | 1,162,272 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Noninterest-bearing |
$ | 122,643 | $ | 121,459 | ||||
Interest-bearing |
1,004,504 | 915,860 | ||||||
Total deposits |
1,127,147 | 1,037,319 | ||||||
Other borrowings |
20,000 | 20,000 | ||||||
Trust preferred securities |
15,123 | 15,087 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable |
1,150 | 1,280 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
916 | 1,803 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
1,164,336 | 1,075,489 | ||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock, par value $.001 per share; 15,000,000 shares authorized;
5,513,482 and 5,374,022 shares issued and outstanding |
6 | 5 | ||||||
Preferred stock, par value $.001 per share; 1,000,000 shares authorized;
no shares outstanding |
| | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
74,402 | 70,729 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
15,808 | 15,087 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
1,010 | 962 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
91,226 | 86,783 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 1,255,562 | $ | 1,162,272 | ||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
SERVISFIRST BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||
Interest and fees on loans |
$ | 12,509 | $ | 12,374 | ||||
Taxable securities |
1,108 | 906 | ||||||
Nontaxable securities |
278 | 215 | ||||||
Federal funds sold |
24 | 273 | ||||||
Other interest and dividends |
18 | 67 | ||||||
Total interest income |
13,937 | 13,835 | ||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||
Deposits |
4,393 | 5,722 | ||||||
Borrowed funds |
498 | 26 | ||||||
Total interest expense |
4,891 | 5,748 | ||||||
Net interest income |
9,046 | 8,087 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
2,460 | 1,383 | ||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
6,586 | 6,704 | ||||||
Noninterest income: |
||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
356 | 256 | ||||||
Other operating income |
563 | 288 | ||||||
Total noninterest income |
919 | 544 | ||||||
Noninterest expenses: |
||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
3,367 | 2,826 | ||||||
Equipment and occupancy expense |
588 | 530 | ||||||
Professional services |
214 | 316 | ||||||
Other operating expenses |
2,263 | 1,158 | ||||||
Total noninterest expenses |
6,432 | 4,830 | ||||||
Income before income taxes |
1,073 | 2,418 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes |
352 | 848 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 721 | $ | 1,570 | ||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.31 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.30 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
SERVISFIRST BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 721 | $ | 1,570 | ||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
||||||||
Unrealized holding gains arising during period from securities
available for sale, net of tax of $71 and $352 for 2009 and
2008, respectively |
138 | 687 | ||||||
Unrealized holding gains arising during period from derivative,
net of tax of $35 for 2008 |
| 68 | ||||||
Reclassification adjustment for net gains realized on derivatives
in net income, net of tax benefit of $46 for 2009 and 2008 |
(90 | ) | (90 | ) | ||||
Other comprehensive income |
48 | 665 | ||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 769 | $ | 2,235 | ||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
Table of Contents
SERVISFIRST BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
Additional | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Common | Paid-in | Retained | Comprehensive | Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||
Stock | Capital | Earnings | Income | Equity | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
$ | 5 | $ | 70,729 | $ | 15,087 | $ | 962 | $ | 86,783 | ||||||||||
Sale of 139,460 shares |
1 | 3,478 | | | 3,479 | |||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
| | | 48 | 48 | |||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation expense |
| 195 | | | 195 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | 721 | | 721 | |||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2009 |
$ | 6 | $ | 74,402 | $ | 15,808 | $ | 1,010 | $ | 91,226 | ||||||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
6
Table of Contents
SERVISFIRST BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 721 | $ | 1,570 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in
operating activities: |
||||||||
Deferred tax benefit |
(967 | ) | (174 | ) | ||||
Provision for loan losses |
2,460 | 1,383 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
273 | 225 | ||||||
Net accretion of investments |
(156 | ) | (77 | ) | ||||
Amortized gain on derivative |
(136 | ) | (136 | ) | ||||
Decrease in accrued interest and dividends receivable |
92 | 13 | ||||||
Stock compensation expense |
195 | 161 | ||||||
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable |
(130 | ) | 118 | |||||
Proceeds from mortgage loans held for sale |
51,562 | 16,873 | ||||||
Originations of mortgage loans held for sale |
(54,320 | ) | (19,178 | ) | ||||
Loss on sale of other real estate |
612 | 184 | ||||||
Net change in other assets, liabilities, and other operating activities |
(1,178 | ) | (1,161 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(973 | ) | (199 | ) | ||||
INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Purchase of securities available for sale |
(6,972 | ) | (2,825 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of securities available
for sale |
4,417 | 2,201 | ||||||
Increase in loans |
(57,179 | ) | (82,620 | ) | ||||
Purchase of premises and equipment |
(167 | ) | (119 | ) | ||||
Purchase of restricted equity securities |
(582 | ) | (1,456 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of interest rate floor |
| 1,000 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned and repossessions |
2,926 | | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(57,557 | ) | (83,819 | ) | ||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net increase in noninterest-bearing deposits |
88,644 | 3,595 | ||||||
Net increase in interest-bearing deposits |
1,184 | 96,493 | ||||||
Proceeds from other borrowings |
| 20,202 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of stock, net |
3,479 | | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
93,307 | 120,290 | ||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
34,777 | 36,272 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
72,918 | 66,422 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
$ | 107,695 | $ | 102,694 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE |
||||||||
Cash paid for: |
||||||||
Interest |
$ | 5,021 | $ | 5,630 | ||||
Income taxes |
1,365 | 1,250 | ||||||
NONCASH TRANSACTIONS |
||||||||
Transfers of loans from held for sale to held for investment |
$ | 293 | $ | | ||||
Other real estate acquired in settlement of loans |
1,436 | 2,085 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
Table of Contents
SERVISFIRST BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 GENERAL
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements in this report have been prepared in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including
Regulation S-X and the instructions for Form 10-Q, and have not been audited. These consolidated
financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U. S.
generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position and the
consolidated results of operations for the interim periods have been made. All such adjustments are
of a normal nature. The consolidated results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the
consolidated results of operations which ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) may achieve
for future interim periods or the entire year. For further information, refer to the consolidated
financial statements and footnotes included in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008.
All reported amounts are in thousands except share and per share data.
NOTE 2 CASH AND CASH FLOWS
Cash on hand, cash items in process of collection, amounts due from banks, and Federal funds sold
are included in cash and cash equivalents.
NOTE 3 EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
Basic earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share include the
dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under stock options and warrants.
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(In Thousands, Except Shares and Per | ||||||||
Share Data) | ||||||||
Earnings per share |
||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
5,401,914 | 5,113,482 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 721 | $ | 1,570 | ||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.31 | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
5,401,914 | 5,113,482 | ||||||
Dilutive effects of assumed conversions and
exercise of stock options and warrants |
287,495 | 170,435 | ||||||
Weighted average common and dilutive potential
common shares outstanding |
5,689,409 | 5,283,917 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 721 | $ | 1,570 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.30 | ||||
8
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
NOTE 4 EMPLOYEE AND DIRECTOR BENEFITS
Stock Options
At March 31, 2009, the Company has stock-based compensation plans, which are described below. The
compensation cost that has been charged against income for the plans was approximately $195,000 and
$161,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Under the Companys 2005 Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan (the Plan), there are 1,025,000
shares authorized for issuance. Option awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to
the estimated fair market value of the Companys common stock at the date of grant. The maximum
term of the options granted under the plan is ten years.
The Company adopted the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan effective March 26, 2009. Up to 425,000 shares
are reserved for issuance under the Plan pursuant to the exercise of options, SARs, restricted
shares, or performance shares, all which are defined in the Plan.
The Company has granted non-plan options to certain persons representing key business relationships
to purchase up to an aggregate amount of 55,000 shares of the Companys common stock at between
$15.00 and $20.00 per share for 10 years. These options are non-qualified and not part of the Plan.
The Company estimates the fair value of each stock option award using a Black-Scholes-Merton
valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table.
Expected volatilities are based on an index of Alabama traded community banks. The expected term
for options granted is based on the short-cut method and represents the period of time that options
granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life
of the option is based on the U. S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
March 31, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Expected volatility |
20.00 | % | 20.00 | % | ||||
Expected dividends |
0.50 | % | 0.50 | % | ||||
Expected term (in years) |
7 | 7 | ||||||
Risk-free rate |
1.65 | % | 2.93 | % |
9
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The
following table summarizes stock option activity during the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Average | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Remaining | |||||||||||||||
Average | Contractual | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Exercise | Term | Intrinsic | ||||||||||||||
Shares | Price | (years) | Value | |||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2009 |
796,000 | $ | 14.50 | 7.7 | $ | 8,363 | ||||||||||
Granted |
37,500 | 25.00 | | | ||||||||||||
Exercised |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Forfeited |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at March 31, 2009 |
833,500 | 14.97 | 7.8 | $ | 8,363 | |||||||||||
Exercisable at March 31, 2009 |
75,264 | $ | 12.34 | 6.9 | $ | 953 | ||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008: |
||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2008 |
712,500 | $ | 13.12 | 8.4 | $ | 4,905 | ||||||||||
Granted |
13,500 | 20.00 | | | ||||||||||||
Exercised |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Forfeited |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at March 31, 2008 |
726,000 | 13.24 | 8.2 | $ | 4,905 | |||||||||||
Exercisable at March 31, 2008 |
20,000 | $ | 10.00 | 7.1 | $ | 200 | ||||||||||
Options for 37,500 shares of the Companys common stock were granted in the first quarter of 2009.
There were no options exercised during the first quarter 2009.
Stock Warrants
In recognition of the efforts and financial risks undertaken by the Banks organizers in 2005, the
Bank granted warrants to organizers to purchase a total 60,000 shares of common stock at a price of
$10, which was the fair market value of the Banks common stock at the date of the grant. The
warrants vest in equal annual increments over a three-year period commencing on the first
anniversary date of the Banks incorporation and will terminate on the tenth anniversary of the
incorporation date. The total number of warrants outstanding at March 31, 2009 and 2008 was 60,000.
The company issued warrants for 75,000 shares of common stock at a price of $25 per share in
the third quarter of 2008. These warrants were issued in connection with the trust preferred
securities that are discussed in detail in Note 9.
NOTE 5 DERIVATIVES
Prior to 2008 the Company entered into an interest rate floor with a notional amount of $50 million
in order to fix the minimum interest rate on a corresponding amount of our floating-rate loans. The
interest rate floor was sold in January 2008 and the related gain of $817,000 has been deferred and
will be amortized to income over the remaining term of the original agreement which would have
terminated on June 22, 2009. A gain of $136,000 was recognized in interest income for the three
months ended March 31, 2009.
10
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
During 2008 the Company entered into interest rate swaps (swaps) to facilitate customer
transactions and meet their financing needs. Upon entering into these swaps, the Company entered
into offsetting positions with a regional correspondent bank in order to minimize the risk to the
Company. As of March 31, 2009, the Company was party to two swaps with notional amounts totaling
approximately $12.3 million with customers, and two swaps with notional amounts totaling
approximately $12.3 million with a regional correspondent bank. These swaps qualify as
derivatives, but are not designated as hedging instruments. The Company has recorded the value of
these swaps at $850,000 in offsetting entries in other assets and other liabilities.
The Company has entered into agreements with secondary market investors to deliver loans on a best
efforts delivery basis. When a rate is committed to a borrower, it is based on the best price that
day and locked with the investor for the customer for a 30-day period. In the event the loan is not
delivered to the investor, the Company has no risk or exposure with the investor. The interest rate
lock commitments related to loans that are originated for later sale are classified as derivatives.
The fair values of our agreements with investors and rate lock commitments to customers as of March
31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were not material.
NOTE 6 ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING INTERPRETATIONS
In March, 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Financial Accounting
Standard (FAS) No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities-an
amendment of FASB No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). This Statement changes the disclosure requirements for
derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosure
about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and
related hedging items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and
(c) how derivative instruments and related hedging items affect an entitys financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows. This statement is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company adopted the
provisions of SFAS No. 161 effective January 1, 2009. See Note 5 for the Companys disclosures
about its derivative instruments and hedging activities.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) No. 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are
Participating Securities. Under the FSP, unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights
to receive non-forfeitable dividends (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities, and
should be included in the two-class method of computing earnings per share. The FSP is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. The
Companys adoption of the provisions of this EITF effective January 1, 2009 did not have an impact
on the consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 7 RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In January 2009, the FASB released Proposed Staff Position SFAS 107-b and Accounting Principles
Board (APB) Opinion No. 28-a, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (SFAS
107-b and APB 28-a). This proposal amends FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Values
of Financial Instruments, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in
interim financial statements as well as in annual financial statements. The proposal also amends
11
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require those disclosures in all interim
financial statements. This proposal is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009,
but early adoption is permitted for interim periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company plans
to adopt SFAS 107-b and APB 28-a and provide the additional disclosure requirements for the second
quarter of 2009.
In March 2009, the FASB released Proposed Staff Position SFAS 157-e, Determining Whether a Market
Is Not Active and a Transaction Is Not Distressed (SFAS 157-e). This proposal provides additional
guidance in determining whether a market for a financial asset is not active and a transaction is
not distressed for fair value measurement purposes as defined in SFAS 157, Fair Value
Measurements. SFAS 157-e is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009, but early
adoption is permitted for interim periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company plans to adopt
the provisions of SFAS 157-e during the second quarter of 2009, but does not believe this guidance
will have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In March 2009, the FASB issued Proposed Staff Position SFAS 115-a, SFAS 124-a, and EITF 99-20-b,
Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. This proposal provides
guidance in determining whether impairments in debt securities are other than temporary, and
modifies the presentation and disclosures surrounding such instruments. This Proposed Staff
Position is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009, but early adoption is
permitted for interim periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company plans to adopt the
provisions of this Proposed Staff Position during second quarter 2009, but does not believe this
guidance will have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 8 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
The Company adopted the methods of fair value measurement as described in SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurement, effective January 1, 2008. SFAS No.157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that
prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value, as of the measurement
date, into three broad levels, which are described below:
Level 1: | Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs. |
Level 2: | Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data. |
Level 3: | Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. |
In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of
observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible, as well as
considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value.
Securities where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified
within level 1 of the hierarchy. Level 1 securities include highly liquid government securities
such as U.S. Treasuries and exchange-traded equity securities. For securities traded in secondary
markets for which quoted market prices are not available, the Company generally relies on prices
obtained from independent vendors. Securities measured with these techniques are classified within
Level 2 of the hierarchy and often involve using quoted market prices for similar securities,
pricing models or
12
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
discounted cash flow calculations using inputs observable in the market where available. Examples
include U.S. government agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, obligations of states and
political subdivisions, and certain corporate, asset-backed and other securities. In certain cases
where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified in Level 3 of the
hierarchy.
Interest Rate Swap Agreements The fair value is estimated by a third party using inputs that are
observable or that can be corroborated by observable market data and, therefore, are classified
within Level 2 of the hierarchy. These fair value estimations include primarily market observable
inputs such as yield curves and option volatilities, and include the value associated with
counterparty credit risk.
Impaired Loans- Loans are considered impaired under SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for
Impairment of Loans, as amended by SFAS No. 118, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan
Income Recognition and Disclosure, when full payment under the loan terms is not expected.
Impaired loans are carried at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loans
existing rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral-dependent. Impaired
loans are subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustment. A portion of the allowance for loan
losses is allocated to impaired loans if the value of such loans is deemed to be less than the
unpaid balance. During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, $1,877,000 and $455,000,
respectively, was recognized as an impairment charge related to impaired loans that are measured at
fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Impaired loans are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.
Other real estate owned Other real estate assets (OREO) acquired through, or in lieu of
foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at the lower of cost or fair value, less
selling costs. Any write-downs to fair value at the time of transfer to OREO are charged to the
allowance for loan losses subsequent to foreclosure. Values are derived from appraisals of
underlying collateral and discounted cash flow analysis. $791,000 and $57,000 was charged to
earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. These charges were for
write-downs in the value of OREO and losses on the disposal of OREO. OREO is classified within
Level 3 of the hierarchy.
The following table presents the fair value hierarchy of financial assets and financial liabilities
measured at fair value as of March 31, 2009:
13
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | ||||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Significant Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
for Identical | Observable Inputs | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Assets (Level 1) | (Level 2) | Inputs (Level 3) | Total | |||||||||||||
Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis: |
||||||||||||||||
Available for sale securities |
$ | | $ | 105,260 | $ | | $ | 105,260 | ||||||||
Interest rate swap agreements |
| 850 | 850 | |||||||||||||
Total assets at fair value |
$ | | $ | 106,110 | $ | | $ | 106,110 | ||||||||
Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreements |
$ | | $ | 850 | $ | | $ | 850 | ||||||||
Assets Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis: |
||||||||||||||||
Impaired loans |
$ | | $ | | $ | 19,359 | $ | 19,359 | ||||||||
Other real estate owned |
| | 8,088 | 8,088 | ||||||||||||
Total assets at fair value |
$ | | $ | | $ | 27,447 | $ | 27,447 | ||||||||
(1) | The Company chose not to elect the fair value option as prescribed by SFAS No. 159 for its financial assets and financial liabilities that had not been previously carried at fair value. |
NOTE 9 SUBORDINATED DEFERRABLE INTEREST DEBENTURES
On September 2, 2008, ServisFirst Capital Trust I, a subsidiary of the Company (the Trust), sold
15,000 shares of its 8.5% trust preferred securities to accredited investors for $15,000,000 or
$1,000 per share and 463,918 shares of its common securities to the Company for $463,918 or $1.00
per share. The Trust invested the $15,463,918 of the proceeds from such sale in the Companys 8.5%
junior subordinated deferrable interest debenture due September 1, 2038 in the principal amount of
$15,463,918 (the Debenture). The Debenture bears a fixed rate of interest at 8.5% per annum and
is subordinate and junior in right of payment to all of the Companys senior debt; provided,
however, the Company will not incur any additional senior debt in excess of 0.5% of the Companys
average assets for the fiscal year immediately preceding, unless approved by a majority of the
holders of the outstanding trust preferred securities.
Holders of the trust preferred securities are entitled to receive distributions accruing from the
original date of issuance. The distributions are payable quarterly in arrears on December 1, March
1, June 1 and September 1 of each year, commencing December 1, 2008. The distributions accrue at an
annual fixed rate of 8.5%. Payments of distributions on the trust preferred securities will be
deferred in the event interest payments on the Debenture is deferred, which may occur at any time
and from time to time, for up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods. During any deferral period,
the Company may not pay dividends or make certain other distributions or payments as provided for
in the Indenture. If payments are deferred, holders accumulate additional distributions thereon at
8.5%, compounded quarterly, to the extent permitted by law.
In addition, the Company issued a total of 75,000 warrants, each with the right to purchase one
share of the Companys common stock for a purchase price of $25.00. The warrants were issued in
increments of 500 for each $100,000 of trust preferred securities purchased. Each warrant is
exercisable for a period beginning upon its date of issuance and ending upon the later to occur of
either (i) September 1, 2013 or (ii) 60 days following the date upon which the Companys common
stock becomes listed for trading upon a national securities exchange as defined under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company estimated the fair value of each warrant
using a Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model and determined the fair value per warrant to be $5.65.
This
14
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
total value of $423,000 was recorded as a discount and reduced the net book value of the debentures
to $15,052,000 with an offsetting increase to the Companys additional paid-in capital. The
discount will be amortized over a three-year period.
The trust preferred securities are subject to mandatory redemption upon repayment of the Debenture
at its maturity, September 1, 2038, or its earlier redemption. The Debenture is redeemable by the
Company (i) prior to September 1, 2011, in whole upon the occurrence of a Special Event, as
defined in the Indenture, or (ii) in whole or in part on or after September 1, 2011 for any reason.
In the event of the redemption of the trust preferred securities prior to September 1, 2011, the
holder of each trust preferred security shall be entitled to $1,050, plus accumulated and unpaid
distributions thereon (including accrued interest thereon), if any, to the date of payment. In the
event of the redemption of the trust preferred securities on or after September 1, 2011, the holder
of each trust preferred security shall be entitled to receive $1,000 plus accumulated and unpaid
distributions thereon (including accrued interest thereon), if any, to the date of payment.
The Company has the right at any time to terminate the Trust and cause the Debenture to be
distributed to the holders of the trust preferred securities in liquidation of the Trust. This
right is optional and wholly within the Companys discretion as set forth in the Indenture.
Payment of periodic cash distributions and payment upon liquidation or redemption with respect to
the trust preferred securities are guaranteed by the Company to the extent of funds held by the
Trust (the Preferred Securities Guarantee). The Preferred Securities Guarantee, when taken
together with the Companys other obligations under the debentures, constitutes a full and
unconditional guarantee, on a subordinated basis, by the Company of payments due on the trust
preferred securities.
The Company is required by the Federal Reserve Board to maintain certain levels of capital for bank
regulatory purposes. The Federal Reserve Board has determined that certain cumulative preferred
securities having the characteristics of trust preferred securities qualify as minority interests,
which is included in tier 1 capital for bank and financial holding companies. In calculating the
amount of Tier 1 qualifying capital, the trust preferred securities can only be included up to the
amount constituting 25% of total Tier 1 capital elements (including trust preferred securities).
Such Tier 1 capital treatment provides the Company with a more cost-effective means of obtaining
capital for bank regulatory purposes than if the Company were to issue preferred stock.
15
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis is designed to provide a better understanding of various
factors relating to the results of operations and financial condition of ServisFirst Bancshares,
Inc. (the Company) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, ServisFirst Bank. This discussion is intended
to supplement and highlight information contained in the accompanying unaudited consolidated
financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008.
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements in this document that are not historical facts, including, but not limited to,
statements concerning future operations, results or performance, are hereby identified as
forward-looking statements for the purpose of the safe harbor provided by Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933. The words believe,
expect, anticipate, project, plan,, intend, will, would, might and similar
expressions often signify forward-looking statements. Such statements involve inherent risks and
uncertainties. ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. cautions that such forward-looking statements, wherever
they occur in this press release or in other statements attributable to ServisFirst Bancshares,
Inc,. are necessarily estimates reflecting the judgment of ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.s senior
management and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking
statements should, therefore, be considered in light of various factors that could affect the
accuracy of such forward-looking statements, including: general economic conditions, especially
in the credit markets and in the Southeast; the performance of the capital markets; changes in
interest rates, yield curves and interest rate spread relationships; changes in accounting and tax
principles, policies or guidelines; changes in legislation or regulatory requirements; changes in
our loan portfolio and the deposit base, possible changes in laws and regulations and governmental
monetary and fiscal policies, including, but not limited to, economic stimulus initiatives and
so-called bailout initiatives; the cost and other effects of legal and administrative cases and
similar contingencies; possible changes in the creditworthiness of customers and the possible
impairment of the collectibility of loans and the value of collateral; the effect of natural
disasters, such as hurricanes, in our geographic markets; and increased competition from both banks
and non-banks. The foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive. For discussion of these and other
risks that may cause actual results to differ from expectations, please refer to Risk Factors in
our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and our other SEC filings. If one or more of the factors
affecting our forward-looking information and statements proves incorrect, then our actual results,
performance or achievements could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by,
forward-looking information and statements contained herein. Accordingly, you should not place
undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.
Business
We are a bank holding company within the meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956
incorporated in Delaware and headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. Through our wholly owned bank
subsidiary, ServisFirst Bank (the Bank), we operate eight full-service banking offices located in
Jefferson, Shelby, Madison, Montgomery and Houston counties in the metropolitan statistical areas
(MSAs) of Birmingham-Hoover, Huntsville, Montgomery and Dothan, Alabama.
16
Table of Contents
We are headquartered at 3300 Cahaba Road, Suite 300, Birmingham, Alabama 35223 (Jefferson County).
In addition to the Jefferson County headquarters, the Bank currently operates through two offices
in the Birmingham-Hoover, Alabama MSA (one office in Jefferson County and one office in North
Shelby County), two offices in the Huntsville, Alabama MSA (Madison County), two offices in the
Montgomery, Alabama MSA (Montgomery County) and one office in the Dothan, Alabama MSA (Houston
County), which constitute our primary service areas. Our principal business is to accept deposits
from the public and to make loans and other investments. Our principal source of funds for loans
and investments are demand, time, savings, and other deposits (including negotiable orders of
withdrawal, or NOW accounts) and the amortization and prepayment of loans and borrowings. Our
principal sources of income are interest and fees collected on loans, interest and dividends
collected on other investments and service charges. Our principal expenses are interest paid on
savings and other deposits (including NOW accounts), interest paid on our other borrowings,
employee compensation, office expenses and other overhead expenses.
Overview
As of March 31, 2009, the Company had total consolidated assets of $1,255,562,000, an increase of
$93,290,000, or 8.03%, over $1,162,272,000 at December 31, 2008. Total loans were $1,023,893,000
at March 31, 2009, a $55,660,000, or 5.75%, increase over $968,233,000 at December 31, 2008. Total
deposits were $1,127,147,000 at March 31, 2009, an increase of $89,828,000, or 8.66%, over the
$1,037,319,000 at December 31, 2008. Loans and deposits increased as a result of organic growth in
existing offices in Birmingham, Huntsville and Montgomery, Alabama, and our expansion into the
Dothan, Alabama market beginning in September 2008.
Net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 was $721,000, a decrease of $849,000, or 54.08%,
compared to $1,570,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2008. Basic and fully diluted earnings per
common share were $.13 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared with $.31 and $.30,
respectively, for the same period in 2008. This decrease was primarily attributable to higher
provision for loan losses and higher costs associated with other real estate owned, as more fully
explained under the captions Provision for Loan Losses and Noninterest Expense, below.
Critical Accounting Policies
The accounting and financial policies of the Company conform to accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States and to general practices within the banking industry. To prepare
consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States, management makes estimates and assumptions based on available information. These
estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the
disclosures provided, and future results could differ. The allowance for loan losses, valuation of
foreclosed real estate and fair value of financial instruments are particularly significant to us
and particularly subject to change. Information concerning our accounting policies with respect to
these items is available in Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2008.
17
Table of Contents
Financial Condition
Investment Securities
Investment securities available for sale totaled $105,260,000 at March 31, 2009, and $102,339,000
at December 31, 2008. The investment portfolio at March 31, 2009, and December 31, 2008 consisted
of the following:
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Market | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gain | Loss | Value | |||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Securities Available for Sale |
||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and government agencies |
$ | 5,007 | $ | 191 | $ | | $ | 5,198 | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
58,038 | 2,762 | | 60,800 | ||||||||||||
State and municipal securities |
35,781 | 341 | (1,230 | ) | 34,892 | |||||||||||
Corporate debt |
5,039 | | (669 | ) | 4,370 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 103,865 | $ | 3,294 | $ | (1,899 | ) | $ | 105,260 | |||||||
Securities Available for Sale |
||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2008: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and government agencies |
$ | 5,093 | $ | 42 | $ | (18 | ) | $ | 5,117 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
60,211 | 2,338 | (5 | ) | 62,544 | |||||||||||
State and municipal securities |
29,879 | 457 | (857 | ) | 29,479 | |||||||||||
Corporate debt |
5,971 | | (772 | ) | 5,199 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 101,154 | $ | 2,837 | $ | (1,652 | ) | $ | 102,339 | |||||||
Each quarter, management assesses whether there have been events or economic circumstances to
indicate that a security on which there is an unrealized loss is other-than-temporarily impaired.
Management considers several factors, including the amount and duration of the impairment; the
intent and ability of the Company to hold the security for a period sufficient for a recovery in
value; and known recent events specific to the issuer or its industry. In analyzing an issuers
financial condition, management considers whether the securities are issued by agencies of the
federal government, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and industry
analysts reports, among other things. As the Company currently has the ability to hold its
investment securities for the foreseeable future, no declines are deemed to be other than
temporary. The Company will continue to evaluate its investment securities for possible
other-than-temporary impairment, which could result in a future non-cash charge to earnings.
The following table shows the amortized cost of the Companys investment securities by their stated
maturity at March 31, 2009:
18
Table of Contents
Less Than | One Year to | Five Years to | More Than | |||||||||||||||||
One Year | Five Years | Ten Years | Ten Years | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and government agencies |
$ | | $ | 1,033 | $ | 3,096 | $ | 878 | $ | 5,007 | ||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
| 36,945 | 17,631 | 3,462 | 58,038 | |||||||||||||||
State and municipal securities |
| 2,877 | 19,211 | 13,693 | 35,781 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate debt |
| | 4,032 | 1,007 | 5,039 | |||||||||||||||
$ | | $ | 40,855 | $ | 43,970 | $ | 19,040 | $ | 103,865 | |||||||||||
Tax-equivalent Yield |
0.00 | % | 5.24 | % | 5.55 | % | 5.86 | % | 5.48 | % |
All securities held are traded in liquid markets. As of March 31, 2009, we owned certain restricted
securities of the Federal Home Loan Bank with an aggregate book value and market value of
$2,991,000 and securities of First National Bankers Bank in which we invested $250,000. We had no
investments in any one security, restricted or liquid, in excess of 10% of our stockholders
equity.
The Banks investment portfolio consists of mortgage-backed pass-through securities, tax-exempt
securities and corporate bonds. The Bank does not invest in collateralized debt obligations
(CDOs). All tax-exempt securities currently held are issued by government issuers within the
State of Alabama. All corporate bonds have a Standard and Poors or Moodys rating of A-1 or better
when purchased. The March 31, 2009 total investment portfolio has a combined average credit rating
of AA+.
The carrying value of investment securities pledged to secure public funds on deposit and for other
purposes as required by law as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $95,422,000 and
$94,022,000, respectively.
At March 31, 2009, we had $88,751,000 in federal funds sold, compared with $19,300,000 at December
31, 2008.
Loans
We had total loans of $1,023,893,000 at March 31, 2009 compared to $968,233,000 at December 31,
2008, an increase of $55,660,000, or 5.75%. At March 31, 2009, 58% of our loans were in our
Birmingham offices, 26% in our Huntsville offices, 12% in our Montgomery offices, and 4% in our
Dothan office. The following table details our loans at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
19
Table of Contents
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
$ | 350,180 | $ | 325,968 | ||||
Real estate construction (1) |
246,868 | 235,162 | ||||||
Real estate mortgage: |
||||||||
Owner occupied |
173,867 | 147,197 | ||||||
1-4 Family |
134,041 | 137,019 | ||||||
Other |
88,408 | 93,412 | ||||||
Total Real Estate Mortgage |
396,316 | 377,628 | ||||||
Consumer |
30,529 | 29,475 | ||||||
Total Loans |
1,023,893 | 968,233 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(12,412 | ) | (10,602 | ) | ||||
Total Loans, Net |
$ | 1,011,481 | $ | 957,631 | ||||
(1) | includes Owner Occupied real estate construction loans in the amount of $13,693 and $7,247 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively |
Asset Quality
We establish and maintain the allowance for loan losses at levels management deems adequate to
absorb anticipated credit losses from identified and otherwise inherent risks in the loan portfolio
as of the balance sheet date. In assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses,
management considers its evaluation of the loan portfolio, past due loan experience, collateral
values, current economic conditions and other factors considered necessary to maintain the
allowance at an adequate level. Management feels that the allowance is adequate at March 31, 2009.
The following table presents a summary of changes in the allowances for loan losses for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The largest balance of our charge-offs is on
real estate construction loans. Real estate construction loans represent 23.62% of our loan
portfolio.
20
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||
Allowance for Loan Losses |
||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 10,602 | $ | 7,732 | ||||
Charge-offs: |
||||||||
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
| (1 | ) | |||||
Real estate construction |
(634 | ) | (279 | ) | ||||
Real estate mortgage: |
||||||||
Owner Occupied |
(40 | ) | | |||||
1-4 family mortgage |
| | ||||||
Other |
| | ||||||
Total real estate mortgage |
(40 | ) | | |||||
Consumer |
(15 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||
Total charge-offs |
(689 | ) | (282 | ) | ||||
Recoveries: |
||||||||
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
| 19 | ||||||
Real estate construction |
39 | | ||||||
Real estate mortgage: |
||||||||
Owner Occupied |
| | ||||||
1-4 family mortgage |
| | ||||||
Other |
| | ||||||
Total real estate mortgage |
| | ||||||
Consumer |
| | ||||||
Total recoveries |
39 | 19 | ||||||
Net charge-offs |
(650 | ) | (263 | ) | ||||
Provision for loan losses charged to expense |
2,460 | 1,383 | ||||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 12,412 | $ | 8,852 | ||||
As a percent of year to date average loans: |
||||||||
Annualized net charge-offs |
0.27 | % | 0.15 | % | ||||
Annualized provision for loan losses |
1.01 | % | 0.77 | % |
The following table presents the allocation of the allowance for loan losses for each respective
loan category with the corresponding percent of loans in each category to total loans. The
comprehensive allowance analysis developed by our credit administration group is in compliance with
all current regulatory guidelines.
March 31, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | March 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of | Percentage of | Percentage of | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans in Each | Loans in Each | Loans in Each | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Category of | Category of | Category of | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Total Loans | Amount | Total Loans | Amount | Total Loans | |||||||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | (In Thousands) | (In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial, financial and
agricultural |
$ | 2,660 | 34.20 | % | $ | 1,502 | 33.67 | % | $ | 1,633 | 31.50 | % | ||||||||||||
Real estate construction |
5,718 | 24.11 | % | 5,473 | 24.29 | % | 4,133 | 29.24 | % | |||||||||||||||
Real estate mortgage |
492 | 38.71 | % | 428 | 39.00 | % | 408 | 35.67 | % | |||||||||||||||
Consumer |
95 | 2.98 | % | 5 | 3.04 | % | 10 | 3.59 | % | |||||||||||||||
Other |
3,447 | | 3,194 | | 2,668 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 12,412 | 100.00 | % | $ | 10,602 | 100.00 | % | $ | 8,852 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||
21
Table of Contents
Non-performing Assets
It is our policy to classify loans as non-accrual when they are past due in principal or interest
payments for more than 90 days or if we believe it is otherwise not reasonable to expect collection
of principal and interest due under the original terms. Exceptions are allowed for 90-day past due
loans when such loans are secured by real estate or negotiable collateral and in the process of
collection. Generally, payments received on non-accrual loans are applied directly to principal.
We have adopted the principles of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) SFAS No. 114 and No.
118 relating to accounting for impaired loans. As of March 31, 2009, our impaired loans, inclusive
of non-accrual loans, totaled $22,142,000 and had associated reserves of approximately $2,783,000.
This compares to impaired loans and associated reserves of $15,880,000 and $1,125,000, respectively
at December 31, 2008. A loan is considered impaired when it is probable, based on current
information and events, that the Company will be unable to collect all principal and interest
payments due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are
measured by the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective
interest rate, the loans obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan
is collateral-dependent. The amount of impairment, if any, and subsequent changes are included in
the allowance for loan losses. Interest on accruing impaired loans is recognized as long as such
loans do not meet the criteria for nonaccrual status.
Non-performing assets, comprising non-accrual loans, loans 90 days or more past due and still
accruing, troubled debt restructurings and other real estate owned (OREO), totaled $23,256,000 at
March 31, 2009, compared to $20,125,000 at December 31, 2008 and $6,126,000 at March 31, 2008.
Non-accrual loans were $11,614,000 at March 31, 2009, an increase of $3,901,000 from non-accrual
loans of $7,713,000 at December 31, 2008 and an increase of $8,931,000 from non-accrual loans of
$2,683,000 at March 31, 2008. Loans 90 days past due and still accruing totaled $3,036,000 at March
31, 2009, compared to $1,939,000 at December 31, 2008 and $0 at March 31, 2008. Troubled debt
restructurings totaled $518,000 at March 31, 2009, compared to $0 at December 31, 2008 and March
31, 2008.
A summary of nonperforming assets as of March 31, 2009, December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008
follows:
March 31, | December 31, | March 31, | ||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2008 | ||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||
Non-accrual loans |
$ | 11,614 | $ | 7,713 | $ | 2,683 | ||||||
Past due 90 days and still accruing (1) |
3,036 | 1,939 | | |||||||||
Troubled debt restructures |
518 | | | |||||||||
All other real estate owned |
8,088 | 10,473 | 3,443 | |||||||||
Total non-performing assets |
$ | 23,256 | $ | 20,125 | $ | 6,126 | ||||||
(1) | $1,804 of this amount represents a loan that is guaranteed by the United States Department of Agriculture. |
The increase in our non-accrual loans and other real estate owned for the first three months of
2009 is directly attributable to the current weak economy and related slowdown in the residential
real estate market. At March 31, 2009, total nonperforming assets included finished homes of
$9,544,000, residential lots of $5,958,000, raw land of $1,766,000 and acquisition and development loans of
$1,309,000. Our OREO procedures currently determine disposition value, the value used to place the
22
Table of Contents
property into OREO, based on the most recent fair value appraisal of the property that we have at
the time, less estimated costs to sell the property. Any difference between the disposition value
and the loan balance is charged off. Once the property is in OREO, sales efforts begin. Should
economic conditions continue to deteriorate, the continued and growing inability of distressed
customers to service their existing debt could cause higher levels of non-performing loans.
Deposits
Total deposits increased $89,828,000, or 8.66%, to $1,127,147,000 at March 31, 2009 compared to
$1,037,319,000 at December 31, 2008. We believe our deposits will continue to increase during 2009
as a result of our expansion into the Dothan market in 2008 and the Montgomery market in 2007 and
expanded customer relationships in the Birmingham and Huntsville markets.
For amounts and rates of our deposits by category, see the table Average Consolidated Balance
Sheets and Net Interest Analysis on a Fully Taxable Equivalent Basis under the subheading Net
Interest Income
Other Borrowings
On March 19, 2008, we borrowed $20,000,000 from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, of which
$10,000,000 bears interest at 2.995%, and is payable on March 19, 2012, and $10,000,000 bears
interest at 3.275% and is payable on March 19, 2013. As discussed in Note 9 to the financial
statements, we borrowed $15.0 million through the issuance of trust preferred securities and the
related debentures on September 2, 2008. Both financial instruments bear an identical annual rate
of interest of 8.50% and pay interest on March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1 of each year.
Liquidity
Liquidity is defined as our ability to generate sufficient cash to fund current loan demand,
deposit withdrawals, or other cash demands and disbursement needs, and otherwise to operate on an
ongoing basis.
The retention of existing deposits and attraction of new deposit sources through new and
existing customers is critical to our liquidity position. In the event of declines in liquidity due
to a run-off in deposits, we have procedures that provide for certain actions under varying
liquidity conditions. These actions include borrowing from existing correspondent banks, selling or
participating loans, and curtailing loan commitments and funding. At March 31, 2009, our liquid
assets, represented by cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and unpledged available-for-sale
securities, totaled $154 million. Additionally, our subsidiary bank had additional borrowing
availability of approximately $65 million in unused federal funds lines of credit with regional
banks, subject to certain restrictions and collateral requirements, and had additional borrowing
availability of $154 million at the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta to meet short-term funding
needs. We believe these sources of funding are adequate to meet immediate anticipated funding
needs, but we will need additional capital to maintain our current growth. Our management meets on
a quarterly basis to review sources and uses of funding to determine the appropriate strategy to
ensure an appropriate level of liquidity. At the current time, our long-term liquidity needs
primarily relate to funds required to support loan originations and commitments and deposit
withdrawals. Our regular sources of funding are from the growth of our deposit base, repayment of
principal and interest on loans, the sale of loans and the renewal of time deposits. In addition,
we also completed the issuance of $15.0 million of trust preferred securities and a related junior
subordinated deferrable interest debenture, each bearing
23
Table of Contents
interest at the rate of 8.5% per annum, on September 2, 2008, as more fully described in Note 9 to
the financial statements.
We are subject to general FDIC guidelines which require a minimum level of liquidity. Management
believes our liquidity ratios meet or exceed these guidelines. Our management is not currently
aware of any trends or demands that are reasonably likely to result in liquidity materially
increasing or decreasing.
The following table reflects the contractual maturities of our term liabilities as of March 31,
2009. The amounts shown do not reflect any early withdrawal or prepayment assumptions.
Payments due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Over 1 - 3 | Over 3 5 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | 1 year or less | years | years | Over 5 years | ||||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual obligations (1) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits without a stated maturity |
$ | 928,077 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Certificates of deposit (2) |
199,069 | 155,675 | 30,026 | 13,368 | | |||||||||||||||
FHLB borrowings |
20,000 | | 10,000 | 10,000 | | |||||||||||||||
Subordinated debentures |
15,123 | | | | 15,123 | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease commitments |
16,331 | 1,527 | 2,994 | 3,090 | 8,720 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,178,600 | $ | 157,202 | $ | 43,020 | $ | 26,458 | $ | 23,843 | ||||||||||
(1) | Excludes interest | |
(2) | Certificates of deposit give customers the right to early withdrawal. Early withdrawals may be subject to penalties. |
The penalty amount dpends on the remaining time to maturity at the time of early withdrawal.
Capital Adequacy
In connection with a private placement and pursuant to subscription agreements effective March 13,
2009, the Company issued and sold to 50 accredited investors 139,460 shares of the Companys common
stock for $25.00 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $3,486,500. This sale completes the
Companys private placement of 400,000 shares of the Companys common stock for $25.00 per share,
or an aggregate purchase price of $10,000,000. All of these shares were sold to investors in the
Dothan, Alabama area, our newest market.
As of March 31, 2009, our most recent notification from the FDIC categorized us as well-capitalized
under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To remain categorized as
well-capitalized, we must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage
ratios as disclosed in the table below. Our management believes that we are well-capitalized under
the prompt corrective action provisions as of March 31, 2009.
The following table sets forth (i) the capital ratios required by the FDIC and the Alabama Banking
Departments leverage ratio requirement and (ii) our actual ratios of capital to total regulatory
or risk-weighted assets, as of March 31, 2009, December 31, 2008, and March 31, 2008:
24
Table of Contents
To Be Well Capitalized | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
For Capital Adequacy | Under Prompt Corrective | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual | Purposes | Action Provisions | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||
As of March 31, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 117,628 | 11.21 | % | $ | 83,945 | 8.00 | % | $ | 104,931 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||
ServisFirst Bank |
116,386 | 11.10 | % | 83,890 | 8.00 | % | 104,862 | 10.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
105,216 | 10.03 | % | 41,972 | 4.00 | % | 62,958 | 6.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
ServisFirst Bank |
103,974 | 9.92 | % | 41,945 | 4.00 | % | 62,917 | 6.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier I Capital to Average Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
105,216 | 8.84 | % | 47,619 | 4.00 | % | 59,524 | 5.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
ServisFirst Bank |
103,974 | 8.74 | % | 47,589 | 4.00 | % | 59,486 | 5.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2008: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 111,424 | 11.25 | % | $ | 79,247 | 8.00 | % | $ | 99,058 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||
ServisFirst Bank |
110,242 | 11.14 | % | 79,182 | 8.00 | % | 98,977 | 10.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
100,822 | 10.18 | % | 39,623 | 4.00 | % | 59,435 | 6.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
ServisFirst Bank |
99,640 | 10.07 | % | 39,591 | 4.00 | % | 59,386 | 6.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier I Capital to Average Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
100,822 | 9.01 | % | 44,746 | 4.00 | % | 55,933 | 5.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
ServisFirst Bank |
99,640 | 8.91 | % | 44,746 | 4.00 | % | 55,933 | 5.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
As of March 31, 2008: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 81,832 | 10.26 | % | $ | 63,779 | 8.00 | % | $ | 79,724 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||
ServisFirst Bank |
81,967 | 10.28 | % | 63,771 | 8.00 | % | 79,714 | 10.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
72,980 | 9.15 | % | 31,890 | 4.00 | % | 47,834 | 6.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
ServisFirst Bank |
73,115 | 9.17 | % | 31,886 | 4.00 | % | 47,828 | 6.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier I Capital to Average Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
72,980 | 8.37 | % | 34,898 | 4.00 | % | 43,622 | 5.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
ServisFirst Bank |
73,115 | 8.38 | % | 34,898 | 4.00 | % | 43,622 | 5.00 | % |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normal course of business we are a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet
risk to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments include commitments
to extend credit beyond current fundings, credit card arrangements, standby letters of credit, and
financial guarantees. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in
excess of the amount recognized in our balance sheet. The contract or notional amounts of those
instruments reflect the extent of involvement we have in those particular financial instruments.
Our exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to such financial
instruments is represented by the contractual or notional amount of those instruments. We use the
same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as we do for on-balance
sheet instruments.
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk at March 31, 2009 are as
follows:
25
Table of Contents
(In Thousands) | ||||
Commitments to extend credit |
$ | 330,768 | ||
Credit card arrangements |
12,978 | |||
Standby letters of credit |
33,370 | |||
$ | 377,116 | |||
Commitments to extend credit beyond current fundings are agreements to lend to a customer as long
as there is no violation of any condition established in the applicable loan agreement. Such
commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require
payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon,
the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. We evaluate
each customers creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained if
deemed necessary by us upon extension of credit is based on our managements credit evaluation.
Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and
equipment, and income-producing commercial properties.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by us to guarantee the performance of
a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private
borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. All
letters of credit are due within one year or less of the original commitment date. The credit risk
involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan
facilities to customers.
Net Income
Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $721,000, compared to net income of
$1,570,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The decrease in net income is primarily
attributable to increases in the provision for loan losses, which increased to $2,460,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to $1,383,000 for the same period in 2008, and
noninterest expenses, which increased to $6,432,000 in 2009 compared to $4,830,000 in 2008. The
increase in provision for loan losses was the result of funding the loan loss reserve to match the
growth in the loan portfolio and an increase in impaired loans. The increase in operating expenses
was the result of our expansion into the Dothan market, the addition of staff in other areas of the
Bank to match capacity needs, and higher OREO expenses. Increases in net interest income, which
increased to $9,046,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $8,087,000 for the same
period in 2008, and noninterest income, which increased to $919,000 in 2009 compared to $544,000 in
2008, partially offset the negative impact of the increase in loan loss provision and higher
expenses. Basic and diluted net income per common share were $.13 and $.13, respectively, for the
three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to $.31 and $.30, respectively, for the same period in
2008. Return on average assets for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was 0.25%, compared to
0.72% in 2008, and return on average stockholders equity was 3.27% for the three months ended
March 31, 2009, compared to 8.58% in 2008.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is the difference between the income earned on interest-earning assets and
interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities used to support such assets. The major factors which
affect net interest income are changes in volumes, the yield on interest-earning assets and the
cost of interest-bearing liabilities. Our managements ability to respond to changes in interest
rates by
26
Table of Contents
effective asset-liability management techniques is critical to maintaining the stability of the net
interest margin and the momentum of our primary source of earnings.
Taxable-equivalent net interest income increased $986,000, or 12.05%, to $9,167,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 compared to $8,181,000 in 2008 as a result of balance sheet growth.
The taxable-equivalent yield on interest-earning assets decreased to 4.92% during the first three
months of 2009 from 6.65% for the first three months of 2008. The average yield on loans for the
first three months of 2009 was 5.08% compared to 6.99% for the first three months of 2008, a 191
basis point decrease. Lower construction lending activity caused a decrease in loan fee income, a
component of the average yield. Loan fees included in the yield calculation decreased to $136,000
for the first three months of 2009 from $298,000 for the same period in 2008. The cost of total
interest-bearing liabilities also decreased, to 2.01% for the first three months in 2009 from 3.25%
for the first three months of 2008. The higher interest rate on the trust preferred securities,
8.50%, sold in September 2008 limited the decrease in the average rate paid on interest-bearing
liabilities.
The following table shows for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the average balances
of each principal category of our assets, liabilities and stockholders equity, and an analysis of
net interest revenue. The table is presented on a taxable equivalent basis if applicable:
27
Table of Contents
Average Balance Sheets and Net Interest Analysis
On a Fully Tax-Equivalent Basis
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
On a Fully Tax-Equivalent Basis
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest | Interest | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Earned / | Average | Average | Earned | Average | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Paid | Yield / Rate | Balance | Paid | Yield / Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans, net of unearned income (1) |
$ | 992,470 | $ | 12,432 | 5.08 | % | $ | 716,095 | $ | 12,341 | 6.99 | % | ||||||||||||
Mortgage loans held for sale |
7,252 | 77 | 4.31 | 2,401 | 33 | 5.57 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
73,787 | 1,108 | 6.09 | 65,111 | 906 | 5.64 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt (2) |
28,340 | 399 | 5.71 | 21,871 | 309 | 5.73 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total investment securities (3) |
102,127 | 1,507 | 5.98 | 86,982 | 1,215 | 5.66 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
34,457 | 24 | 0.28 | 38,196 | 273 | 2.90 | ||||||||||||||||||
Restricted equity securities |
2,672 | | 0.00 | 1,367 | 14 | 4.15 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing balances with banks |
19,479 | 18 | 0.37 | 4,752 | 53 | 4.52 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
$ | 1,158,457 | $ | 14,058 | 4.92 | % | $ | 849,793 | $ | 13,929 | 6.65 | % | ||||||||||||
Non-interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
18,669 | 15,768 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net fixed assets and equipment |
3,865 | 4,181 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses, accrued
interest and other assets |
9,483 | 2,198 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,190,474 | $ | 871,940 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and stockholders equity: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing demand deposits |
$ | 143,743 | $ | 500 | 1.41 | % | $ | 67,486 | $ | 346 | 2.08 | % | ||||||||||||
Savings deposits |
852 | 1 | 0.48 | 376 | 1 | 1.08 | ||||||||||||||||||
Money market accounts |
629,453 | 2,543 | 1.64 | 546,495 | 4,217 | 3.13 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time deposits |
178,203 | 1,349 | 3.07 | 99,830 | 1,158 | 4.70 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
35,104 | 498 | 5.75 | 2,858 | 26 | 3.69 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
$ | 987,355 | $ | 4,891 | 2.01 | $ | 717,045 | $ | 5,748 | 3.25 | ||||||||||||||
Non-interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest-bearing demand
deposits |
111,806 | 77,859 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilites |
1,990 | 3,411 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
88,019 | 72,559 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains on
securities and derivatives |
1,304 | 1,066 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
$ | 1,190,474 | $ | 871,940 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest spread |
2.91 | % | 3.40 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin |
3.21 | % | 3.90 | % |
(1) | Non-accrual loans are included in average loan balances in all periods. Loan fees of $136,000 and $298,000 are included in interest income in 2009 and 2008, respectively. | |
(2) | Interest income and yields are presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis using a tax rate of 34%. | |
(3) | Unrealized gains of $1,760,000 and $1,435,000 are excluded from the yield calculation in 2009 and 2008, respectively. |
The following table reflects changes in our net interest margin as a result of changes in the
volume and rate of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Changes as a
result of mix or the number of days in the periods have been allocated to the volume and rate
changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.
28
Table of Contents
2009 Compared to 2008 Increase (Decrease) | ||||||||||||
in Interest Income and Expense Due to | ||||||||||||
Changes in: | ||||||||||||
Volume | Rate | Total | ||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||
Loans, net of unearned income |
4,763 | (4,672 | ) | 91 | ||||||||
Mortgages held for sale |
67 | (23 | ) | 44 | ||||||||
Investment securities: |
||||||||||||
Securities taxable |
121 | 81 | 202 | |||||||||
Securities non taxable |
91 | (1 | ) | 90 | ||||||||
Federal funds sold |
(27 | ) | (222 | ) | (249 | ) | ||||||
Restricted equity securities |
13 | (27 | ) | (14 | ) | |||||||
Interest-bearing balances with banks |
164 | (199 | ) | (35 | ) | |||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
5,192 | (5,063 | ) | 129 | ||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Interest-bearing demand deposits |
391 | (237 | ) | 154 | ||||||||
Savings |
1 | (1 | ) | | ||||||||
Money market accounts |
640 | (2,314 | ) | (1,674 | ) | |||||||
Time deposits |
909 | (718 | ) | 191 | ||||||||
Other borrowed funds |
293 | 179 | 472 | |||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
2,234 | (3,091 | ) | (857 | ) | |||||||
Increase in net interest income |
2,958 | (1,972 | ) | 986 | ||||||||
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision expense for loan losses represents the amount determined by management to be
necessary to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level capable of absorbing inherent losses
in the loan portfolio. Our management reviews the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a
quarterly basis. The allowance for loan losses calculation is segregated into various segments that
include classified loans, loans with specific allocations and pass rated loans. A pass rated loan
is generally characterized by a very low to average risk of default and is a loan in which
management perceives there is a minimal risk of loss. Loans are rated using a nine-point risk grade
scale with loan officers having the primary responsibility for assigning risk grades and for the
timely reporting of changes in the risk grades. These processes, the assigned risk grades, and the
criticized and classified loans in the portfolio are segregated into the following regulatory
classifications: Special Mention, Substandard, Doubtful or Loss. Impaired loans are reviewed
specifically and separately under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 114 to
determine the appropriate reserve allocation. Our management compares the investment in an impaired
loan with the present value of expected future cash flow discounted at the loans effective
interest rate, the loans observable market price or the fair value of the collateral, if the loan
is collateral-dependent, to determine the specific reserve allowance. Reserve percentages assigned
to non-rated loans are based on historical charge-off experience adjusted for other risk factors.
To evaluate the overall adequacy of the allowance to absorb losses inherent in our loan portfolio,
our management considers historical loss experience based on volume and types of loans, trends in
classifications, volume and trends in delinquencies and non-accruals, economic conditions and other
pertinent information. Based on future evaluations, additional provisions for loan losses may be
necessary to maintain the allowance for loan losses at an appropriate level.
29
Table of Contents
The provision for loan losses was $2,460,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, an increase
of $1,077,000 over $1,383,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Our management continues
to maintain a proactive approach to credit risk management. Nonperforming loans increased to
$15,168,000, or 1.48% of total loans, at March 31, 2009 from $9,652,000, or 1.00% of total loans,
at December 31, 2008, and from $2,683,000 or 0.35% of total loans, at March 31, 2008. Impaired
loans increased to $22,142,000 at March 31, 2009 compared to $15,880,000 at December 31, 2008 and
$13,502,000 at March 31, 2008. As a percentage of total loans, impaired loans increased to 2.16%
at March 31, 2009 compared to 1.55% at December 31, 2008, and 1.79% at March 31, 2008. The
allowance for loan losses totaled $12,412,000, or 1.21% of loans, net of unearned income, at March
31, 2009, compared to $10,602,000, or 1.09% of loans, net of unearned income, at December 31, 2008.
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income totaled $919,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, an increase of
$375,000, or 68.93%, compared to the same period in 2008.
Income from mortgage banking operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $465,000, an
increase of $255,000, or 121.43%, from $210,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008. These
increases are due to increased refinancing activity in 2009 as a result of lower mortgage rates.
Income from customer service charges and fees for the three months ended March 31, 2009 increased
$100,000, or 39.06%, to $356,000 from $256,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The
increase is primarily due to an increase in transaction accounts from 2008 to 2009. Merchant
service fees were $149,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, an increase of $55,000, or
58.51%, compared to $94,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense totaled $6,432,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, an increase of
$1,602,000, or 33.17%, compared to $4,830,000 in 2008.
Noninterest expense increased for the three months ended March 31, 2009 over the corresponding
period in 2008 primarily due to our continued growth and expansion which has resulted in the
addition of personnel and the opening of a new office in Dothan. Salaries and employee benefits
increased $541,000, or 19.14%, to $3,367,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to
$2,826,000 in 2008. This increase is primarily the result of our increased employee base to 153
employees at March 31, 2009 from 120 at March 31, 2008. Other operating expenses increased
$1,106,000, or 95.51%, to $2,264,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to
$1,158,000 in 2008. This increase was primarily the result of an increase in OREO expenses to
$897,000 in 2009 from $25,000 in 2008.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense was $352,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 versus $848,000 for the
same period in 2008. Our effective tax rates for the periods were 32.81% and 35.07%, respectively.
Our primary permanent differences are related to FAS 123(R) option expenses and tax-free income.
30
Table of Contents
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
Like all financial institutions, we are subject to market risk from changes in interest rates.
Interest rate risk is inherent in the balance sheet due to the mismatch between the maturities of
rate-sensitive assets and rate-sensitive liabilities. If rates are rising, and the level of
rate-sensitive liabilities exceeds the level of rate-sensitive assets, the net interest margin will
be negatively impacted. Conversely, if rates are falling, and the level of rate-sensitive
liabilities is greater than the level of rate-sensitive assets, the impact on the net interest
margin will be favorable. Managing interest rate risk is further complicated by the fact that all
rates do not change at the same pace; in other words, short-term rates may be rising while
longer-term rates remain stable. In addition, different types of rate-sensitive assets and
rate-sensitive liabilities react differently to changes in rates.
To manage interest rate risk, we must take a position on the expected future trend of interest
rates. Rates may rise, fall or remain the same. Our asset-liability committee develops its view of
future rate trends and strives to manage rate risk within a targeted range by monitoring economic
indicators, examining the views of economists and other experts, and understanding the current
status of our balance sheet. Our annual budget reflects the anticipated rate environment for the
next 12 months. The asset-liability committee conducts a quarterly analysis of the rate sensitivity
position and reports its results to our board of directors.
The asset-liability committee thoroughly analyzes the maturities of rate-sensitive assets and
liabilities. This analysis measures the gap which is defined as the difference between the dollar
amount of rate-sensitive assets repricing during a period and the volume of rate-sensitive
liabilities repricing during the same period. The gap is also expressed as the ratio of
rate-sensitive assets divided by rate-sensitive liabilities. If the ratio is greater than one,
the dollar value of assets exceeds the dollar value of liabilities; the balance sheet is
asset-sensitive. Conversely, if the value of liabilities exceeds the value of assets, the ratio
is less than one and the balance sheet is liability-sensitive. Our internal policy requires
management to maintain the gap such that net interest margins will not change more than 10% if
interest rates change 100 basis points or more than 15% if interest rates change 200 basis points.
As of March 31, 2009, our gap was within such ranges.
The interest rate risk model that defines the gap position also performs a rate shock test of the
balance sheet. The rate shock procedure measures the impact on the economic value of equity (EVE)
which is a measure of long term interest rate risk. EVE is the difference between the market value
of our assets and the liabilities and is our liquidation value. In this analysis, the model
calculates the discounted cash flow or market value of each category on the balance sheet. The
percent change in EVE is a measure of the volatility of risk. Regulatory guidelines specify a
maximum change of 30% for a 200-basis point rate change. At March 31, 2009, the percent change at
plus or minus 200 basis points is well within that range, at 3.79% and 5.49%, respectively.
The chart below identifies the EVE impact of a shift in rates of 100 and 200 basis points in either
direction.
Economic Value of Equity Under Rate Shock
At March 31, 2009
At March 31, 2009
-200 bps | -100 bps | 0 bps | +100 bps | +200 bps | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Economic value of equity |
$ | 96,232 | $ | 86,494 | $ | 91,226 | $ | 93,437 | $ | 94,688 | ||||||||||
Actual dollar change |
$ | 5,006 | $ | (4,732 | ) | $ | 2,211 | $ | 3,462 | |||||||||||
Percent change |
5.49 | % | -5.19 | % | 2.42 | % | 3.79 | % |
31
Table of Contents
The EVE rate shock shows that the EVE would increase in both rising and declining rate
environments. The EVE simulation model is a static model which provides information only at a
certain point in time. For example, in a rising rate environment, the model does not take into
account actions which management might take to change the impact of rising rates on us. Given that
limitation, it is still useful is assessing the impact of an unanticipated movement in interest
rates.
The above analysis may not on its own be an entirely accurate indicator of how net interest income
or EVE will be affected by changes in interest rates. Income associated with interest-earning
assets and costs associated with interest-bearing liabilities may not be affected uniformly by
changes in interest rates. In addition, the magnitude and duration of changes in interest rates may
have a significant impact on net interest income. Interest rates on certain types of assets and
liabilities fluctuate in advance of changes in general market rates, while interest rates on other
types may lag behind changes in general market rates. As noted above, our asset-liability committee
develops its view of future rate trends by analyzing a variety of factors and making a quarterly
analysis of our rate sensitivity position that is reported to our board of directors.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
CEO and CFO Certification.
Appearing as exhibits to this report are Certifications of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and
our Chief Financial Officer (CFO). The Certifications are required to be made by Rule 13a-14
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). This item contains the
information about the evaluation that is referred to in the Certifications, and the information set
forth below in this Item 4 should be read in conjunction with the Certifications for a more
complete understanding of the Certifications.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information
is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure
controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well
designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control
objectives.
We conducted an evaluation (the Evaluation) of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our disclosure controls and procedures under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our CEO and CFO, as of March 31, 2009. Based upon the Evaluation, our CEO and
CFO have concluded that, as of March 31, 2009, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective
to ensure that material information relating to ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries
is made known to management, including the CEO and CFO, particularly during the period when our
periodic reports are being prepared.
There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
32
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time we may be a party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of
business. We are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings except as disclosed in
Item 3, Legal Proceedings, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2008, and there has been no material change in any matter described therein.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Our business is influenced by many factors that are difficult to predict, involve uncertainties
that may materially affect actual results and are often beyond our control. We have identified a
number of these risk factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2008, which should be taken into consideration when reviewing the information contained in this
report. There have been no material changes with regard to the risk factors previously disclosed in
the Form 10-K. For other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those
indicated in any forward-looking statement or projection contained in this report, see
Forward-Looking Statements under Part 1, Item 2 above.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
In connection with a private placement and pursuant to subscription agreements effective March 13,
2009, the Company issued and sold to 50 accredited investors 139,460 shares of the Companys common
stock for $25.00 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $3,486,500. This sale completes the
Companys private placement of 400,000 shares of the Companys common stock for $25.00 per share,
or an aggregate purchase price of $10,000,000. All of these shares were sold to investors in the
Dothan, Alabama area, our newest market. These shares were issued and sold in reliance on the
exemption from registration provided by Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibit:
31.01 Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).
31.02 Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).
32.01 Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
32.02 Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
33
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SERVISFIRST BANCSHARES, INC. |
||||
Date: May 6, 2009 | By | /s/ Thomas A. Broughton, III | ||
Thomas A. Broughton, III | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Date: May 6, 2009 | By | /s/ William M. Foshee | ||
William M. Foshee | ||||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||
34