ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2010 September (Form 10-Q)
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark one)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
|
FOR
THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
2010
|
¨ TRANSITION REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For
the transition period from _______to_______
Commission
file number 000-53149
SERVISFIRST
BANCSHARES, INC.
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
|
26-0734029
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
Incorporation
or Organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
(205)
949-0302
(Registrant’s
Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to submit and post such files).
Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and small
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer ¨
Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting
company ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practical date.
Class
|
Outstanding as of October 29,
2010
|
|||
Common
stock, $.001 par value
|
5,518,482
|
PART I. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
Consolidated
Financial Statements
|
3
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
21
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
|
38
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
38
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
39
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
39
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
39
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
40
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
40
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
40
|
EX-31.01
SECTION 302, CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO
|
||
EX-31.02
SECTION 302, CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO
|
||
EX-31.01
SECTION 906, CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO
|
||
EX-31.01
SECTION 906, CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO
|
2
PART
1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SERVISFIRST
BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND DECEMBER 31, 2009
(In
thousands, except share and per share amounts)
September 30,
2010
|
December 31,
2009
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Audited)
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$ | 30,371 | $ | 26,982 | ||||
Interest-bearing
balances due from depository institutions
|
119,470 | 48,544 | ||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
2,213 | 680 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
152,054 | 76,206 | ||||||
Debt
securities:
|
||||||||
Available
for sale
|
249,207 | 255,453 | ||||||
Held
to maturity
|
2,631 | 645 | ||||||
Restricted
equity securities
|
3,510 | 3,241 | ||||||
Mortgage
loans held for sale
|
8,708 | 6,202 | ||||||
Loans
|
1,345,502 | 1,207,084 | ||||||
Less
allowance for loan losses
|
(16,903 | ) | (14,737 | ) | ||||
Loans,
net
|
1,328,599 | 1,192,347 | ||||||
Premises
and equipment, net
|
4,484 | 5,088 | ||||||
Accrued
interest and dividends receivable
|
6,834 | 6,200 | ||||||
Deferred
tax assets
|
2,347 | 4,872 | ||||||
Other
real estate owned
|
8,170 | 12,525 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
9,980 | 10,718 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 1,776,524 | $ | 1,573,497 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Deposits:
|
||||||||
Noninterest-bearing
|
$ | 224,537 | $ | 211,307 | ||||
Interest-bearing
|
1,377,020 | 1,221,048 | ||||||
Total
deposits
|
1,601,557 | 1,432,355 | ||||||
Other
borrowings
|
24,933 | 24,922 | ||||||
Trust
preferred securities
|
30,384 | 15,228 | ||||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
914 | 1,026 | ||||||
Other
liabilities
|
2,559 | 2,344 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
1,660,347 | 1,475,875 | ||||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
||||||||
Common
stock, par value $.001 per share; 15,000,000 shares authorized; 5,518,482
shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2010 and 5,513,482 shares
issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
6 | 6 | ||||||
Preferred
stock, par value $.001 per share; 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares
outstanding
|
- | - | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
75,637 | 75,078 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
33,798 | 20,965 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
6,736 | 1,573 | ||||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
116,177 | 97,622 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$ | 1,776,524 | $ | 1,573,497 |
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
(In
thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
income:
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
and fees on loans
|
$ | 17,715 | $ | 14,598 | $ | 50,669 | $ | 40,690 | ||||||||
Taxable
securities
|
1,575 | 1,006 | 4,997 | 3,117 | ||||||||||||
Nontaxable
securities
|
582 | 402 | 1,650 | 1,022 | ||||||||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
23 | 77 | 41 | 148 | ||||||||||||
Other
interest and dividends
|
64 | 9 | 100 | 30 | ||||||||||||
Total
interest income
|
19,959 | 16,092 | 57,457 | 45,007 | ||||||||||||
Interest
expense:
|
||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
3,113 | 4,031 | 8,795 | 12,391 | ||||||||||||
Borrowed
funds
|
859 | 617 | 2,461 | 1,626 | ||||||||||||
Total
interest expense
|
3,972 | 4,648 | 11,256 | 14,017 | ||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
15,987 | 11,444 | 46,201 | 30,990 | ||||||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
2,537 | 3,209 | 7,612 | 8,277 | ||||||||||||
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
13,450 | 8,235 | 38,589 | 22,713 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest
income:
|
||||||||||||||||
Service
charges on deposit accounts
|
564 | 419 | 1,718 | 1,151 | ||||||||||||
Securities
gains
|
- | - | 53 | - | ||||||||||||
Other
operating income
|
784 | 548 | 1,713 | 2,018 | ||||||||||||
Total
noninterest income
|
1,348 | 967 | 3,484 | 3,169 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest
expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
3,547 | 3,398 | 10,176 | 10,354 | ||||||||||||
Equipment
and occupancy expense
|
814 | 767 | 2,368 | 1,977 | ||||||||||||
Professional
services
|
220 | 228 | 625 | 657 | ||||||||||||
Other
operating expenses
|
2,886 | 2,579 | 9,291 | 7,299 | ||||||||||||
Total
noninterest expenses
|
7,467 | 6,972 | 22,460 | 20,287 | ||||||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
7,331 | 2,230 | 19,613 | 5,595 | ||||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
2,532 | 622 | 6,780 | 1,708 | ||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 4,799 | $ | 1,608 | $ | 12,833 | $ | 3,887 | ||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.87 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 2.33 | $ | 0.71 | ||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.77 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 2.11 | $ | 0.67 |
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
SERVISFIRST
BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
(In
thousands)
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 4,799 | $ | 1,608 | $ | 12,833 | $ | 3,887 | ||||||||
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
holding gains arising during period from securities available for sale,
net of tax of $1,124 and $2,817 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010, respectively, and $1,304 and $1,330 for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009
|
2,087 | 2,532 | 5,197 | 2,582 | ||||||||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for net gains on sale of securities in net income, net of tax
of $19 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
|
- | - | (34 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for net gains realized on derivatives in net income, net of tax
benefit of $93 for the nine months ended September 30,
2009
|
- | - | - | (180 | ) | |||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax
|
2,087 | 2,532 | 5,163 | 2,402 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$ | 6,886 | $ | 4,140 | $ | 17,996 | $ | 6,289 |
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
SERVISFIRST
BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
(Unaudited)
(In
thousands, except share amounts)
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
Retained
Earnings
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
|
Total
Stockholders'
Equity
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2009
|
6 | 75,078 | 20,965 | 1,573 | 97,622 | |||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income
|
- | - | - | 5,163 | 5,163 | |||||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
- | 50 | - | - | 50 | |||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
- | 509 | - | - | 509 | |||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
- | - | 12,833 | - | 12,833 | |||||||||||||||
Balance,
September 30, 2010
|
$ | 6 | $ | 75,637 | $ | 33,798 | $ | 6,736 | $ | 116,177 |
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
6
SERVISFIRST
BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(In
thousands) (Unaudited)
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 12,833 | $ | 3,887 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Deferred
tax benefit
|
(292 | ) | (909 | ) | ||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
7,612 | 8,277 | ||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
800 | 802 | ||||||
Net
amortization (accretion) of investments
|
565 | (326 | ) | |||||
Amortized
gain on derivative
|
- | (272 | ) | |||||
Market
value adjustment of interest rate cap
|
40 | - | ||||||
Increase
in accrued interest and dividends receivable
|
(634 | ) | (1,137 | ) | ||||
Stock
compensation expense
|
509 | 584 | ||||||
Decrease
in accrued interest payable
|
(112 | ) | (177 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale of mortgage loans held for sale
|
112,068 | 148,071 | ||||||
Originations
of mortgage loans held for sale
|
(115,361 | ) | (151,699 | ) | ||||
Gain
on sale of securities available for sale
|
(53 | ) | (42 | ) | ||||
Net
loss on sale of other real estate owned
|
180 | 817 | ||||||
Write
down of other real estate owned
|
853 | 622 | ||||||
Decrease
in special prepaid FDIC insurance assessments
|
1,963 | - | ||||||
Loss
on disposal of premises and equipment
|
- | 2 | ||||||
Net
change in other assets, liabilities, and other operating
activities
|
(773 | ) | (1,079 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
20,198 | 7,421 | ||||||
INVESTMENT
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Purchase
of securities available for sale
|
(40,817 | ) | (45,913 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from maturities, calls and paydowns of securities available for
sale
|
23,517 | 12,825 | ||||||
Purchase
of securities held to maturity
|
(1,986 | ) | - | |||||
Increase
in loans
|
(147,150 | ) | (197,275 | ) | ||||
Purchase
of premises and equipment
|
(196 | ) | (2,144 | ) | ||||
Purchase
of restricted equity securities
|
(269 | ) | (582 | ) | ||||
Purchase
of interest rate cap
|
(160 | ) | - | |||||
Proceeds
from sale of securities available for sale
|
31,014 | 2,083 | ||||||
Proceeds
from disposal of premises and equipment
|
- | 1 | ||||||
Proceeds
from sale of other real estate owned and repossessions
|
7,470 | 5,249 | ||||||
Additions
to other real estate owned
|
(75 | ) | - | |||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(128,652 | ) | (225,756 | ) | ||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Net
increase in noninterest-bearing deposits
|
13,230 | 53,630 | ||||||
Net
increase in interest-bearing deposits
|
155,972 | 270,534 | ||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of trust preferred securities
|
15,050 | - | ||||||
Proceeds
from other borrowings
|
- | 5,000 | ||||||
Proceeds
from sale of stock, net
|
- | 3,479 | ||||||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
50 | - | ||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
184,302 | 332,643 | ||||||
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
75,848 | 114,308 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
76,206 | 72,918 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of year
|
$ | 152,054 | $ | 187,226 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE
|
||||||||
Cash
paid for:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 11,368 | $ | 14,194 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
6,958 | 3,117 | ||||||
NONCASH
TRANSACTIONS
|
||||||||
Transfers
of loans from held for sale to held for investment
|
$ | 787 | $ | 1,861 | ||||
Other
real estate acquired in settlement of loans
|
5,156 | 9,464 | ||||||
Internally
financed sales of other real estate owned
|
1,083 | 468 |
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
SERVISFIRST
BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September
30, 2010
(Unaudited)
NOTE
1 - GENERAL
The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements in this report have
been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, including Regulation S-X and the instructions for Form
10-Q, and have not been audited. These consolidated financial statements do not
include all of the information and footnotes required by U. S. generally
accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion
of management, all adjustments necessary to present fairly the consolidated
financial position and the consolidated results of operations for the interim
periods have been made. All such adjustments are of a normal nature. The
consolidated results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the
consolidated results of operations which ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (the
“Company”) may achieve for future interim periods or the entire year. For
further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and
footnotes included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009.
All
reported amounts are in thousands except share and per share data.
Certain
reclassifications have been made in the December 31, 2009 Consolidated Balance
Sheet to conform to classifications used in 2010. There was no effect
on total assets, liabilities or stockholders’ equity.
NOTE
2 - CASH AND CASH FLOWS
Cash on
hand, cash items in process of collection, amounts due from banks, and Federal
funds sold are included in cash and cash equivalents.
NOTE
3 - EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
Basic
earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the
period. Diluted earnings per common share include the dilutive effect
of additional potential common shares issuable under stock options and warrants,
as well as the potential common stock issuable upon possible conversion of the
preferred securities described in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
8
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
(In Thousands, Except Shares and Per Share Data)
|
||||||||||||||||
Earnings
Per Share
|
||||||||||||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
5,515,384 | 5,513,482 | 5,513,482 | 5,476,701 | ||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 4,799 | $ | 1,608 | $ | 12,833 | $ | 3,887 | ||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.87 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 2.33 | $ | 0.71 | ||||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
5,515,384 | 5,513,482 | 5,513,482 | 5,476,701 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive
effects of assumed conversions and exercise of stock options, warrants,
and convertible debt
|
902,563 | 307,849 | 735,377 | 297,740 | ||||||||||||
Weighted
average common and dilutive potential common shares
outstanding
|
6,417,947 | 5,821,331 | 6,248,859 | 5,774,441 | ||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 4,799 | $ | 1,608 | $ | 12,833 | $ | 3,887 | ||||||||
Effect
of interest expense on convertible debt, net of tax and discretionary
expenditures related to conversion
|
150 | - | 323 | - | ||||||||||||
Net
income, adjusted for effect of debt conversion
|
$ | 4,949 | $ | 1,608 | $ | 13,156 | $ | 3,887 | ||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.77 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 2.11 | $ | 0.67 |
NOTE
4 - SECURITIES
The
amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity
securities at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are summarized as
follows:
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gain
|
Gross
Unrealized
Loss
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
September
30, 2010:
|
||||||||||||||||
Securities
Available for Sale
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury and government sponsored agencies
|
$ | 60,648 | $ | 3,465 | $ | - | $ | 64,113 | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
110,381 | 4,079 | (81 | ) | 114,379 | |||||||||||
State
and municipal securities
|
65,804 | 2,907 | (216 | ) | 68,495 | |||||||||||
Corporate
debt
|
2,011 | 209 | - | 2,220 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 238,844 | $ | 10,660 | $ | (297 | ) | $ | 249,207 | |||||||
Securities
Held to Maturity
|
||||||||||||||||
State
and municipal securities
|
$ | 2,631 | $ | 76 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 2,704 | |||||||
Total
|
$ | 2,631 | $ | 76 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 2,704 | |||||||
December
31, 2009:
|
||||||||||||||||
Securities
Available for Sale
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury and government sponsored agencies
|
$ | 92,368 | $ | 412 | $ | (453 | ) | $ | 92,327 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
99,608 | 2,717 | (625 | ) | 101,700 | |||||||||||
State
and municipal securities
|
58,090 | 876 | (567 | ) | 58,399 | |||||||||||
Corporate
debt
|
3,004 | 36 | (13 | ) | 3,027 | |||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 253,070 | $ | 4,041 | $ | (1,658 | ) | $ | 255,453 | |||||||
Securities
Held to Maturity
|
||||||||||||||||
State
and municipal securities
|
$ | 645 | $ | 1 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 643 | |||||||
Total
|
$ | 645 | $ | 1 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 643 |
9
All
mortgage-backed securities are with government sponsored enterprises (GSEs) such
as Federal National Mortgage Association, Government National Mortgage
Association, Federal Home Loan Bank, and Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation.
The
following table identifies, as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the
Company’s investment securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position for less than 12 months and those that have been in a continuous
unrealized loss position for 12 or more months. The Company has the
ability and intent to hold its securities until such time as lost value is
recovered, or the securities mature. Further, the Company believes
any deterioration in value on its current investment securities is attributable
to changes in market interest rates and not credit quality of the
issuer.
Less Than Twelve Months
|
Twelve Months or More
|
|||||||||||||||
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
September
30, 2010:
|
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
$ | (81 | ) | $ | 13,292 | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||
State
and municipal securities
|
(131 | ) | 4,269 | (88 | ) | 3,028 | ||||||||||
$ | (212 | ) | $ | 17,561 | $ | (88 | ) | $ | 3,028 | |||||||
December
31, 2009:
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury and government sponsored agencies
|
$ | (453 | ) | $ | 44,910 | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
(625 | ) | 44,993 | - | - | |||||||||||
State
and municipal securities
|
(570 | ) | 20,479 | - | - | |||||||||||
Corporate
debt
|
- | - | (13 | ) | 986 | |||||||||||
$ | (1,648 | ) | $ | 110,382 | $ | (13 | ) | $ | 986 |
At
September 30, 2010, 14 of the Company’s 375 debt securities had been in an
unrealized loss position for 12 or more months. The Company does not
believe these unrealized losses are “other than temporary” since it has the
ability and intent to hold the investments for a period of time sufficient to
allow for a recovery in market value, and it is not probable that the Company
will be unable to collect all of the amounts contractually due. The
Company has not identified any issues related to the ultimate repayment of
principal as a result of credit concerns on these securities.
NOTE
5 - EMPLOYEE AND DIRECTOR BENEFITS
Stock Options
At
September 30, 2010, the Company had stock-based compensation plans, as described
below. The compensation cost that has been charged to earnings for the plans was
approximately $195,000 and $509,000 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and $189,000 and $584,000 for three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively.
The
Company’s 2005 Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan allows for the grant of
stock options to purchase up to 1,025,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.
The Company’s 2009 Stock Incentive Plan authorizes the grant of up to 425,000
shares and allows for the issuance of Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted
Stock, Stock Options, Non-stock Share Equivalents, Performance Shares or
Performance Units. Both plans allow for the grant of incentive stock
options and non-qualified stock options, and awards are generally granted with
an exercise price equal to the estimated fair market value of the Company’s
common stock at the date of grant. The maximum term of the options granted under
the plans is ten years.
10
The
Company has granted non-plan options to certain persons representing key
business relationships to purchase up to an aggregate amount of 55,000 shares of
the Company’s common stock at between $15.00 and $20.00 per share for 10 years.
These options are non-qualified and not part of either Plan.
The
Company estimates the fair value of each stock option award using a
Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model that uses assumptions of expected
volatility, dividends paid on the Company’s stock, term, and the risk-free rate.
Expected volatilities are based on an index of southeastern United States
publicly traded banks. The expected term for options granted is based on the
short-cut method and represents the period of time that options granted are
expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate for periods within the
contractual life of the option is based on the U. S. Treasury yield curve in
effect at the time of grant. Assumptions for each component input
into the model for options granted are as follows:
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Expected
volatility
|
26.00 | % | 20.00 | % | ||||
Expected
dividends
|
0.00 | % | 0.50 | % | ||||
Expected
term (in years)
|
7
years
|
7
years
|
||||||
Risk-free
rate
|
2.10 | % | 1.70 | % |
The
following table summarizes stock option activity during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009:
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
|||||||||||||
(In Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2010:
|
||||||||||||||||
Outstanding
at January 1, 2010
|
863,500 | $ | 15.17 | 6.8 | $ | 8,488 | ||||||||||
Granted
|
37,500 | 25.00 | 9.8 | - | ||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(5,000 | ) | 10.00 | - | - | |||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(10,000 | ) | 15.00 | 6.6 | - | |||||||||||
Outstanding
at September 30, 2010
|
886,000 | 15.62 | 6.3 | $ | 8,313 | |||||||||||
Exercisable
at September 30, 2010
|
272,627 | $ | 11.96 | 5.3 | $ | 3,555 | ||||||||||
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2009:
|
||||||||||||||||
Outstanding
at January 1, 2009
|
826,000 | $ | 14.70 | 7.7 | $ | 8,513 | ||||||||||
Granted
|
40,000 | 25.00 | 9.4 | - | ||||||||||||
Exercised
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(2,500 | ) | 15.00 | 7.2 | - | |||||||||||
Outstanding
at September 30, 2009
|
863,500 | 15.17 | 7.1 | $ | 8,488 | |||||||||||
Exercisable
at September 30, 2009
|
146,862 | $ | 12.40 | 6.5 | $ | 1,851 |
11
Restricted
Stock
During
the first quarter of 2010, 10,000 shares of restricted stock were awarded to
employees. During the fourth quarter of 2009, 20,000 shares of
restricted stock were awarded to a key executive. The value of
restricted stock awards is determined to be the current value of the Company’s
stock, and this total value will be recognized as compensation expense over the
vesting period, which is five years from the date of grant. As of
September 30, 2010, there was $623,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to non-vested restricted stock. The cost is expected to be
recognized evenly over the remaining 4.2 years of the restricted stock’s vesting
period.
Stock Warrants
In
recognition of the efforts and financial risks undertaken by the organizers of
ServisFirst Bank (the “Bank”) in 2005, the Bank granted warrants to organizers
to purchase a total 60,000 shares of common stock at a price of $10.00 per
share, which was the fair market value of the Bank’s common stock at the date of
the grant. The warrants became warrants to purchase a like number of shares of
the Company’s common stock upon the formation of the Company as a holding
company for the Bank. The warrants vest in equal annual increments
over a three-year period commencing on the first anniversary date of the Bank’s
incorporation and will terminate on the tenth anniversary of the incorporation
date. The total number of warrants outstanding at September 30, 2010 and 2009
was 60,000.
The
Company issued warrants for 75,000 shares of common stock at a price of $25 per
share in the third quarter of 2008. These warrants were issued in connection
with the trust preferred securities that are discussed in detail in Note
9.
The
Company issued warrants for 15,000 shares of common stock at a price of $25 per
share in the second quarter of 2009. These warrants were issued in
connection with the issuance and sale of the Bank’s 8.25% Subordinated Note
discussed in detail in Note 11.
NOTE
6 - DERIVATIVES
During
2008, the Company entered into interest rate swaps (“swaps”) to facilitate
customer transactions and meet their financing needs. Upon entering into these
swaps, the Company entered into offsetting positions with a regional
correspondent bank in order to minimize the risk to the Company. As
of September 30, 2010, the Company was party to two swaps with notional amounts
totaling approximately $12.0 million with customers, and two swaps with notional
amounts totaling approximately $12.0 million with a regional correspondent
bank. These swaps qualify as derivatives, but are not designated as
hedging instruments. The Company has recorded the value of these
swaps at $1,032,000 in offsetting entries in other assets and other
liabilities.
On August
24, 2010, the Company entered into an interest rate cap with a notional value of
$100,000,000. The cap has a strike rate of 2.00% and is indexed to
the three month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). The cap does
not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, and is marked to market, with
changes in market value reflected in interest expense. The cap was
marked down by $40,000 during the quarter ended September 30, 2010, and is
currently valued at $120,000.
12
The
Company has entered into agreements with secondary market investors to deliver
loans on a “best efforts delivery” basis. When a rate is committed to a
borrower, it is based on the best price that day and locked with the investor
for the customer for a 30-day period. In the event the loan is not delivered to
the investor, the Company has no risk or exposure with the investor. The
interest rate lock commitments related to loans that are originated for later
sale are classified as derivatives. The fair values of the Company’s agreements
with investors and rate lock commitments to customers as of September 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009 were not material.
NOTE
7 - ADOPTION OF RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued two related
accounting pronouncements changing the accounting principles and disclosure
requirements for securitizations and special purpose entities. The
pronouncements remove the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity”,
change the requirements for derecognizing financial assets and change how a
company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not
controlled through voting should be consolidated. These
pronouncements also expand existing disclosure requirements to include more
information about transfers of financial assets and where companies have
exposure to the risks related to transfers of financial assets. The
Company adopted the provisions of these pronouncements as of January 1, 2010,
but neither had a material impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
During
January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-06 –
“Improving Disclosures About
Fair Value Measurements”, which added disclosure requirements about
transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2, clarified existing fair value disclosure
requirements about the appropriate level of disaggregation, and clarified that a
description of valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value was
required for recurring and nonrecurring Level 2 and 3 fair value
measurements. The Company adopted these provisions of the ASU in preparing
the Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended September 30,
2010. The adoption of these provisions of this ASU, which was subsequently
codified into Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures,” only affected the disclosure requirements for fair value
measurements and as a result had no impact on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for the disclosures required by this ASU.
This ASU
also requires that Level 3 activity about purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis be presented
on a gross basis rather than as a net number, as currently permitted. This
provision of the ASU is effective for the Company’s reporting period ending June
30, 2011. As this provision amends only the disclosure requirements for
fair value measurements, the adoption will have no impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
During February 2010, the FASB updated
ASU No. 2010-09, Subsequent Events
(Topic 855) – Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements.
This guidance amends FASB
ASC Topic 855, Subsequent
Events, so that issuers
filing periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC
filers”) no longer are required to disclose the date through which subsequent
events have been evaluated in originally issued and revised financial
statements. SEC filers must evaluate subsequent events through the date the
financial statements are issued.
13
During
July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality
of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit
Losses. This guidance requires disclosures regarding loans and
the allowance for loan losses that are disaggregated by portfolio segment and
class of financing receivable. Required enhancements to current
disclosures include a rollforward of the allowance for loans losses by portfolio
segment, with the ending balance broken out by basis of impairment method, as
well as the recorded investment in the respective loans. Nonaccrual
and impaired loans by class must also be shown. Disclosure
requirements also include: 1) credit quality indicators by class, 2) aging of
past due loans by class, 3) troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) by class and
their effect on the allowance for loan losses, 4) defaults on TDRs by class and
their effect on the allowance for loan losses, and 5) significant purchases and
sales of loans disaggregated by portfolio segment. This guidance is
effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December
15, 2010, for end of period disclosures. Activity related disclosures
are required for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after
December 15, 2010. While impacting its disclosures, this ASU will not
have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
NOTE
8 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
Measurement
of fair value under United States generally accepted accounting principles
(“U.S. GAAP”) establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes observable and
unobservable inputs used to measure fair value, as of the measurement date, into
three broad levels, which are described below:
Level
1:
|
Quoted
prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the
measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives
the highest priority to Level 1
inputs.
|
Level
2:
|
Observable
prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but
corroborated by market data.
|
Level
3:
|
Unobservable
inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value
hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3
inputs.
|
In
determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize
the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the
extent possible, and also considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment
of fair value.
Securities – Where quoted
prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within level
1 of the hierarchy. Level 1 securities include highly liquid
government securities such as U.S. Treasuries and exchange-traded equity
securities. For securities traded in secondary markets for which
quoted market prices are not available, the Company generally relies on prices
obtained from independent vendors. Securities measured with these
techniques are classified within Level 2 of the hierarchy and often involve
using quoted market prices for similar securities, pricing models or discounted
cash flow calculations using inputs observable in the market where
available. Examples include U.S. government agency securities,
mortgage-backed securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions,
and certain corporate, asset-backed and other securities. In certain
cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are
classified in Level 3 of the hierarchy.
Derivatives – The fair value
is estimated by a third party using inputs that are observable or that can be
corroborated by observable market data and, therefore, are classified within
Level 2 of the hierarchy. These fair value estimations include
primarily market observable inputs such as yield curves and option volatilities,
and include the value associated with counterparty credit risk.
Impaired Loans- Impaired
loans are measured and reported at fair value when full payment under
the loan terms is not expected. Impaired loans are carried at the
present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or
the fair value of the collateral if the loan is
collateral-dependent. Impaired loans are subject to nonrecurring fair
value adjustment. A portion of the allowance for loan losses is
allocated to impaired loans if the value of such loans is deemed to be less than
the unpaid balance. The amount recognized as an impairment charge
related to impaired loans that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring
basis was $1,248,000 and $5,100,000 during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010, respectively, and $1,586,000 and $4,919,000 for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Impaired
loans are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.
14
Other real estate owned –
Other real estate assets (“OREO”) acquired through, or in lieu of, foreclosure
are held for sale and are initially recorded at the lower of cost or fair value,
less selling costs. Any write-downs to fair value at the time of
transfer to OREO are charged to the allowance for loan losses subsequent to
foreclosure. Values are derived from appraisals of underlying
collateral and discounted cash flow analysis. The amount charged to
earnings was $372,000 and $1,031,000 during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010, respectively, and $359,000 and $1,326,000 during the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2009. These charges were for
write-downs in the value of OREO and losses on the disposal of
OREO. OREO is classified within Level 3 of the
hierarchy.
The
following table presents the Company’s financial assets and financial
liabilities carried at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009:
Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2010 Using
|
||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
Assets
Measured on a Recurring Basis:
|
||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale
securities
|
$ | - | $ | 249,207 | $ | - | $ | 249,207 | ||||||||
Interest
rate swap agreements
|
- | 1,032 | 1,032 | |||||||||||||
Interest
rate cap
|
120 | 120 | ||||||||||||||
Total
assets at fair value
|
$ | - | $ | 250,359 | $ | - | $ | 250,359 | ||||||||
Liabilities
Measured on a Recurring Basis:
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
rate swap agreements
|
$ | - | $ | 1,032 | $ | - | $ | 1,032 |
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2009 Using
|
||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
Assets
Measured on a Recurring Basis:
|
||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale
securities
|
$ | - | $ | 255,453 | $ | - | $ | 255,453 | ||||||||
Interest
rate swap agreements
|
- | 413 | 413 | |||||||||||||
Total
assets at fair value
|
$ | - | $ | 255,866 | $ | - | $ | 255,866 | ||||||||
Liabilities
Measured on a Recurring Basis:
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
rate swap agreements
|
$ | - | $ | 413 | $ | - | $ | 413 |
15
The
following table presents the Company’s financial assets and financial
liabilities carried at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009:
Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2010 Using
|
||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
Assets
Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis:
|
||||||||||||||||
Impaired
loans
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 13,790 | $ | 13,790 | ||||||||
Other
real estate owned
|
- | - | 8,170 | 8,170 | ||||||||||||
Total
assets at fair value
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 21,960 | $ | 21,960 |
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2009 Using
|
||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
Assets
Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis:
|
||||||||||||||||
Impaired
loans
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 8,003 | $ | 8,003 | ||||||||
Other
real estate owned
|
- | - | 12,525 | 12,525 | ||||||||||||
Total
assets at fair value
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 20,528 | $ | 20,528 |
The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount that would be exchanged in a sale between willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument. Current U.S. GAAP excludes certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its fair value disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of the Company.
The
carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments,
including those that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring
basis or non-recurring basis, at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were
as follows:
16
September 30, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||
Carrying
Amount
|
Fair Value
|
Carrying
Amount
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Financial
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 152,054 | $ | 152,054 | $ | 76,206 | $ | 76,206 | ||||||||
Investment
securities available for sale
|
249,207 | 249,207 | 255,453 | 255,453 | ||||||||||||
Investment
securities held to maturity
|
2,631 | 2,704 | 645 | 643 | ||||||||||||
Restricted
equity securities
|
3,510 | 3,510 | 3,241 | 3,241 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage
loans held for sale
|
8,708 | 8,708 | 6,202 | 6,202 | ||||||||||||
Loans,
net
|
1,328,599 | 1,328,336 | 1,192,173 | 1,193,202 | ||||||||||||
Accrued
interest and dividends receivable
|
6,834 | 6,834 | 6,200 | 6,200 | ||||||||||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
1,032 | 1,032 | 413 | 413 | ||||||||||||
Interest
rate cap
|
120 | 120 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Financial
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
$ | 1,601,557 | $ | 1,603,162 | $ | 1,432,355 | $ | 1,435,387 | ||||||||
Borrowings
|
24,933 | 26,343 | 24,922 | 25,981 | ||||||||||||
Trust
preferred securities
|
30,384 | 27,087 | 15,228 | 12,681 | ||||||||||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
914 | 914 | 1,026 | 1,026 | ||||||||||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
1,032 | 1,032 | 413 | 413 |
The
following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its
fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and cash
equivalents: The carrying amounts reported in the statements
of financial condition for cash and cash equivalents approximate those assets’
fair values.
Investment
securities: Fair values for investment securities are based on
quoted market prices, where available. If a quoted market price is
not available, fair value is based on quoted market prices of comparable
instruments.
Restricted equity
securities: Fair values for other investments are considered
to be their cost.
Loans: For
variable-rate loans that re-price frequently and with no significant change in
credit risk, fair value is based on carrying amounts. The fair value
of other loans (for example, fixed-rate commercial real estate loans, mortgage
loans, and industrial loans) is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis
based on option-adjusted spread rates tied to the LIBOR swap curve, with term
structures matching each loan being valued. Loan fair value estimates
include judgments regarding future expected loss experience and risk
characteristics. Fair value for impaired loans is estimated using
underlying collateral values, where applicable, or discounted cash flow
analysis.
Derivatives: The
fair values of the derivative agreements are based on quoted prices from an
outside third party.
Accrued interest and dividends
receivable: The carrying amount of accrued interest and
dividends receivable approximates its fair value.
Deposits: The fair
values of demand deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on
demand at the reporting date (that is, their carrying amounts). The
carrying amounts of variable-rate, fixed-term money market accounts and
certificates of deposit approximate their fair values. Fair values
for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash
flow analysis based on option-adjusted spread rates tied to the LIBOR swap
curve, with term structures matching each certificate of deposit being
valued.
17
Other
borrowings: The fair values of other borrowings are estimated
using discounted cash flow analysis, based on interest rates currently being
offered by the Federal Home Loan Bank for borrowings of similar terms as those
being valued.
Trust preferred
securities: The fair values of trust preferred securities are
estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, based on interest rates
currently being offered on the best alternative debt available at the
measurement date.
Accrued interest
payable: The carrying amount of accrued interest payable
approximates its fair value.
Loan
commitments: The fair values of the Company’s off-balance
sheet financial instruments are based on fees currently charged to enter into
similar agreements. Since the majority of the Company’s other
off-balance-sheet instruments consist of non-fee-producing, variable-rate
commitments, the Company has determined they do not have a distinguishable fair
value.
NOTE
9 - SUBORDINATED DEFERRABLE INTEREST DEBENTURES
On
September 2, 2008, ServisFirst Capital Trust I, a subsidiary of the Company (the
“2008 Trust”), sold 15,000 shares of its 8.5% trust preferred securities to
accredited investors for $15,000,000, or $1,000 per share, and 463,918 shares of
its common securities to the Company for $463,918, or $1.00 per share. The 2008
Trust invested the proceeds from such sale in the Company’s 8.5% junior
subordinated deferrable interest debenture due September 1, 2038 in the
principal amount of $15,463,918 (the “Debenture”). The Debenture bears a fixed
rate of interest at 8.5% per annum and is subordinate and junior in right of
payment to all of the Company’s senior debt; provided, however, the Company will
not incur any additional senior debt in excess of 0.5% of the Company’s average
assets for the fiscal year immediately preceding, unless such incurrence is
approved by a majority of the holders of the outstanding trust preferred
securities.
Holders
of the trust preferred securities are entitled to receive distributions accruing
from the original date of issuance. The distributions are payable quarterly in
arrears on December 1, March 1, June 1 and September 1 of each year, commencing
December 1, 2008. The distributions accrue at an annual fixed rate of 8.5%.
Payments of distributions on the trust preferred securities will be deferred in
the event interest payments on the Debenture is deferred, which may occur at any
time and from time to time, for up to 20 consecutive
quarterly periods. During any deferral period, the Company
may not pay dividends or make certain other distributions or payments as
provided for in the Indenture. If payments are deferred, holders
accumulate additional distributions thereon at 8.5%, compounded quarterly, to
the extent permitted by law.
In
addition, the Company issued a total of 75,000 warrants, each representing the
right to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock for a purchase price
of $25.00. The warrants were issued in increments of 500 for each $100,000 of
trust preferred securities purchased. Each warrant is exercisable for a period
beginning upon its date of issuance and ending upon the later to occur of either
(i) September 1, 2013 or (ii) 60 days following the date upon which the
Company’s common stock becomes listed for trading upon a “national securities
exchange” as defined under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company
estimated the fair value of each warrant using a Black-Scholes-Merton valuation
model and determined the fair value per warrant to be $5.65. This total value of
$423,000 was recorded as a discount and reduced the net book value of the
debentures to $15,052,000 with an offsetting increase to the Company’s
additional paid-in capital. The discount will be amortized over a three-year
period.
18
The trust
preferred securities are subject to mandatory redemption upon repayment of the
Debenture at its maturity, September 1, 2038, or its earlier redemption. The
Debenture is redeemable by the Company (i) prior to September 1, 2011, in whole
upon the occurrence of a Special Event, as defined in the Indenture, or (ii) in
whole or in part on or after September 1, 2011 for any reason. In the event of
the redemption of the trust preferred securities prior to September 1, 2011, the
holders of the trust preferred securities will be entitled to $1,050 per share,
plus accumulated and unpaid distributions thereon (including accrued interest
thereon), if any, to the date of payment. In the event of the redemption of the
trust preferred securities on or after September 1, 2011, the holders of the
trust preferred securities will be entitled to receive $1,000 per share plus
accumulated and unpaid distributions thereon (including accrued interest
thereon), if any, to the date of payment.
The
Company has the right at any time to terminate the 2008 Trust and cause the
Debenture to be distributed to the holders of the trust preferred securities in
liquidation of the Trust. This right is optional and wholly within the Company’s
discretion as set forth in the Indenture.
Payment
of periodic cash distributions and payment upon liquidation or redemption with
respect to the trust preferred securities are guaranteed by the Company to the
extent of funds held by the Trust (the “Preferred Securities Guarantee”). The
Preferred Securities Guarantee, when taken together with the Company’s other
obligations under the debentures, constitutes a full and unconditional
guarantee, on a subordinated basis, by the Company of payments due on the trust
preferred securities.
The
Company is required by the Federal Reserve Board to maintain certain levels of
capital for bank regulatory purposes. The Federal Reserve Board has determined
that certain cumulative preferred securities having the characteristics of trust
preferred securities qualify as minority interests, which is included in Tier 1
capital for bank and financial holding companies. In calculating the amount of
Tier 1 qualifying capital, the trust preferred securities can only be included
up to the amount constituting 25% of total Tier 1 capital elements (including
trust preferred securities). Such Tier 1 capital treatment provides the Company
with a more cost-effective means of obtaining capital for bank regulatory
purposes than if the Company were to issue preferred stock.
NOTE
10 – JUNIOR SUBORDINATED MANDATORY CONVERTIBLE DEFERRABLE INTEREST DEBENTURES
DUE MARCH 15, 2040
On
February 9, 2010 the Company established a new Delaware statutory trust
subsidiary, ServisFirst Capital Trust II (the “2010 Trust”), which issued 15,000
shares of its 6.0% Mandatory Convertible Trust Preferred Securities (the
“Preferred Securities”) for $15,000,000, or $1,000 per Preferred Security, on
March 15, 2010. The 2010 Trust simultaneously issued 50,000 shares of its common
securities to the Company for a purchase price of $50,000, or $1.00 per share,
which together with the Preferred Securities constitute all of the issued and
outstanding securities of the 2010 Trust (collectively, the “Trust
Securities”). The 2010 Trust invested all of the proceeds from the
sale of the Trust Securities in the Company’s 6.0% Junior Subordinated Mandatory
Convertible Deferrable Interest Debentures due March 15, 2040 in the principal
amount of $15,050,000 (the “Subordinated Debentures”). The Preferred
Securities were offered and sold to accredited investors in a private
placement.
19
Holders
of the Preferred Securities will be entitled to receive distributions accruing
from March 15, 2010, and payable quarterly in arrears on March 15, June 15,
September 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing June 15, 2010 unless the
Company defers interest payments on the Subordinated
Debentures. Distributions accrue at an annual rate equal to 6.0% of
the liquidation amount of $1,000 per Preferred Security. The rate and
the distribution dates for the Preferred Securities correspond to the interest
rate and payment dates on the Subordinated Debentures, which constitute
substantially all the assets of the 2010 Trust. As a result, if
principal or interest is not paid on the Subordinated Debentures, no
corresponding amounts will be paid on the Preferred Securities. The
2010 Trust also pays a distribution on the common securities at an annual rate
of 6.0% of the purchase price of the common securities, but such payments are
financially immaterial since they simply represent a return of funds to the
Company.
The
Subordinated Debentures are subordinate and junior in right of payment to all of
the Company’s senior debt, as defined in the Indenture governing the
Subordinated Debentures; provided, however, that, while any of the Preferred
Securities remain outstanding, the Company shall not incur any additional senior
debt in excess of 0.5% of the Company’s average assets for the fiscal year
immediately preceding, unless approved by the holders of a majority of the
outstanding Preferred Securities. The Company has the right to defer
payments of interest on the Subordinated Debentures from time to time, for up to
20 consecutive quarterly periods for each deferral period. During any
deferral period, the Company may not (i) pay dividends on or redeem any of its
capital stock, (ii) pay principal of or interest on any debt securities ranking
pari passu with or
subordinate to the Subordinated Debentures or (iii) make any guaranty payments
with respect to any guaranty of the debt securities of any of the Company’s
subsidiaries if such guaranty ranks pari passu with or junior in
right of payment to the Subordinated Debentures.
If not
previously redeemed or converted into common stock of the Company, the Preferred
Securities will automatically and mandatorily convert into common stock of the
Company on March 15, 2013 at a conversion price of $25 per share of common
stock. In addition to such mandatory conversion, the Preferred
Securities may be converted into common stock of the Company at the option of
the holder at any time prior to the earliest to occur of maturity, redemption or
mandatory conversion at the same conversion price.
The
Preferred Securities are subject to mandatory redemption upon repayment of the
Subordinated Debentures at their stated maturity (as defined in the Indenture),
or upon earlier redemption of the Subordinated Debentures. The Subordinated
Debentures are redeemable by the Company at any time in whole, but not in part,
upon the occurrence of a special event, as defined in the
Indenture.
The
Company has the right at any time to terminate the 2010 Trust and cause the
Subordinated Debentures to be distributed to the holders of the Preferred
Securities in liquidation of the 2010 Trust. This right is optional and wholly
within the Company’s discretion.
The
Company is required by the Federal Reserve Board to maintain certain levels of
capital for bank regulatory purposes. The Federal Reserve Board has determined
that certain cumulative preferred securities having the characteristics of trust
preferred securities qualify as minority interests, which is included in Tier 1
capital for bank and financial holding companies. In calculating the
amount of Tier 1 qualifying capital, the trust preferred securities can only be
included up to the amount constituting 25% of total Tier 1 capital elements
(including trust preferred securities). Such Tier 1 capital treatment provides
the Company with a more cost-effective means of obtaining capital for bank
regulatory purposes than if the Company were to issue preferred
stock.
20
NOTE
11 - SUBORDINATED NOTE DUE SEPTEMBER 1, 2016
On June
23, 2009, the Bank issued $5,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its 8.25%
Subordinated Note due June 1, 2016 to an accredited investor at 100% of
par. The note is subordinate and junior in right of payment upon any
liquidation of the Bank as to principal, interest and premium to obligations to
the Bank’s depositors and other obligations to its general and secured
creditors. Interest payments are due and payable on each September 1,
December 1, March 1 and June 1, commencing on September 1,
2009. Interest accrues at an annual rate of 8.25%. The
proceeds from the note payable are included in Tier 2 capital of the Bank and
the Company.
In
addition, the Company issued to the investor a total of 15,000 warrants, each
representing the right to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock for a
purchase price of $25.00. Each warrant is exercisable for a period beginning
upon its date of issuance and ending on June 1, 2016. The Company
estimated the fair value of each warrant using a Black-Scholes-Merton valuation
model and determined the fair value per warrant to be $5.71. This total value of
$86,000 was recorded as a discount and reduced the net book value of the
debentures to $4,914,000 with an offsetting increase to the Company’s additional
paid-in capital. The discount will be amortized over a five-year
period.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The
following discussion and analysis is designed to provide a better understanding
of various factors relating to the results of operations and financial condition
of ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) and its wholly owned subsidiary,
ServisFirst Bank (the “Bank”). This discussion is intended to supplement and
highlight information contained in the accompanying unaudited consolidated
financial statements as of September 30, 2010 and for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
Forward-Looking
Statements
Statements
in this document that are not historical facts, including, but not limited to,
statements concerning future operations, results or performance, are hereby
identified as “forward-looking statements” for the purpose of the safe harbor
provided by Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 27A
of the Securities Act of 1933. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,”
“project,” “plan,” “intend,” “will,” “would,” “might” and similar expressions
often signify forward-looking statements. Such statements involve inherent risks
and uncertainties. ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. cautions that such
forward-looking statements, wherever they occur in this press release or in
other statements attributable to ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc., are necessarily
estimates reflecting the judgment of ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.’s senior
management and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking
statements. Such forward-looking statements should, therefore, be
considered in light of various factors that could affect the accuracy of such
forward-looking statements, including: general economic conditions, especially
in the credit markets and in the Southeast; the performance of the capital
markets; changes in interest rates, yield curves and interest rate spread
relationships; changes in accounting and tax principles, policies or guidelines;
changes in legislation or regulatory requirements; changes in our loan portfolio
and the deposit base, possible changes in laws and regulations and governmental
monetary and fiscal policies, including, but not limited to, economic stimulus
initiatives and so-called “bailout” initiatives; the cost and other effects of
legal and administrative cases and similar contingencies; possible changes in
the creditworthiness of customers and the possible impairment of the
collectibility of loans and the value of collateral; the effect of natural
disasters, such as hurricanes, in our geographic markets; and increased
competition from both banks and non-banks. The foregoing list of
factors is not exhaustive. For discussion of these and other risks that may
cause actual results to differ from expectations, please refer to “Risk Factors”
in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and our other SEC filings. If one
or more of the factors affecting our forward-looking information and statements
proves incorrect, then our actual results, performance or achievements could
differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, forward-looking
information and statements contained herein. Accordingly, you should not place
undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the
date made.
21
Business
We are a
bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 incorporated in
Delaware and headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. Through the Bank, we operate
eight full-service banking offices located in Jefferson, Shelby, Madison,
Montgomery and Houston counties in the metropolitan statistical areas (“MSAs”)
of Birmingham-Hoover, Huntsville, Montgomery and Dothan, Alabama.
We are
headquartered at 850 Shades Creek Parkway, Birmingham, Alabama 35209 (Jefferson
County). In addition to the Jefferson County headquarters, the Bank currently
operates through two offices in the Birmingham-Hoover MSA (one office in
Jefferson County and one office in North Shelby County), two offices in the
Huntsville MSA (Madison County), two offices in the Montgomery MSA (Montgomery
County) and one office in the Dothan MSA (Houston County), which constitute our
primary service areas. Our principal business is to accept deposits from the
public and to make loans and other investments. Our principal sources of funds
for loans and investments are demand, time, savings, and other deposits
(including negotiable orders of withdrawal, or NOW accounts). Our principal
sources of income are interest and fees collected on loans, interest and
dividends collected on other investments and service charges. Our principal
expenses are interest paid on savings and other deposits (including NOW
accounts), interest paid on our other borrowings, employee compensation, office
expenses and other overhead expenses.
Overview
As of
September 30, 2010, the Company had total consolidated assets of $1,776,524,000,
an increase of $203,027,000, or 12.90%, over $1,573,497,000 at December 31,
2009. Total loans were $1,345,502,000 at September 30, 2010, an
increase of $138,418,000, or 11.47%, over $1,207,084,000 at December 31, 2009.
Total deposits were $1,601,557,000 at September 30, 2010, an increase of
$169,202,000, or 11.81%, over $1,432,355,000 at December 31, 2009.
Net
income for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 was $4,799,000, an increase of
$3,191,000, or 198.45%, from $1,608,000 for the quarter ended September 30,
2009. Basic and fully diluted earnings per common share were $.87 and
$.77, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared with
$.29 and $.28, respectively, for the same period in 2009. This
increase was primarily attributable to a higher net interest margin and an
improved efficiency ratio, both of which are explained in detail under the
captions “Net Interest Income” and “Noninterest Expense”, respectively,
below.
Net
income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $12,833,000, an increase
of $8,946,000, or 230.15%, from $3,887,000 for the nine months ended September
30, 2009. Basic and fully diluted earnings per share were $2.33 and
$2.11, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared with
$.71 and $.67, respectively for the same period in 2009. Again, this increase
was primarily attributable to a higher net interest margin and an improved
efficiency ratio, as explained below.
22
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
accounting and financial policies of the Company conform to accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States and to general practices
within the banking industry. To prepare consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States,
management makes estimates and assumptions based on available information. These
estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the financial
statements and the disclosures provided, and future results could differ. The
allowance for loan losses, valuation of foreclosed real estate, deferred taxes,
and fair value of financial instruments are particularly subject to
change. Information concerning our accounting policies with respect
to these items is available in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
Financial
Condition
Investment Securities
Investment
securities available for sale totaled $249,207,000 at September 30, 2010 and
$255,453,000 at December 31, 2009. Investment securities held to
maturity totaled $2,631,000 at September 30, 2010 and $645,000 at December 31,
2009. Approximately $34,597,000 in callable agency securities were
sold or called during the first nine months of 2010, and were replaced by the
purchase of $31,030,000 in mortgage-backed securities and $10,354,000 in
municipal debt securities. The purchased securities will increase the
portfolio yield and will also provide monthly principal cash flow.
Each
quarter, management assesses whether there have been events or economic
circumstances to indicate that a security on which there is an unrealized loss
is other-than-temporarily impaired. Management considers several
factors, including the amount and duration of the impairment; the intent and
ability of the Company to hold the security for a period sufficient for a
recovery in value; and known recent events specific to the issuer or its
industry. In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, management
considers whether the securities are issued by agencies of the federal
government, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and
industry analysts’ reports, among other things. As the Company currently has the
ability to hold its investment securities for the foreseeable future, no
declines are deemed to be other than temporary. The Company will continue to
evaluate its investment securities for possible other-than-temporary impairment,
which could result in a future non-cash charge to earnings.
23
The
following table shows the amortized cost of the Company’s investment securities
by their stated maturity at September 30, 2010:
Less Than
One Year
|
One Year to
Five Years
|
Five Years to
Ten Years
|
More Than
Ten Years
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury and government sponsored agencies
|
$ | - | $ | 28,551 | $ | 21,367 | $ | 10,730 | $ | 60,648 | ||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
- | 1,265 | 18,771 | 90,345 | 110,381 | |||||||||||||||
State
and municipal securities
|
165 | 6,539 | 45,907 | 15,824 | 68,435 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate
debt
|
- | - | 2,011 | - | 2,011 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 165 | $ | 36,355 | $ | 88,056 | $ | 116,899 | $ | 241,475 | |||||||||||
Taxable-equivalent
Yield
|
6.96 | % | 2.80 | % | 4.85 | % | 4.16 | % | 4.21 | % |
All
securities held are traded in liquid markets. As of September 30, 2010, we owned
certain restricted securities of the Federal Home Loan Bank with an aggregate
book value and market value of $3,260,000 and certain securities of First
National Bankers Bank in which we invested $250,000. We had no
investments in any one security, restricted or liquid, in excess of 10% of our
stockholders’ equity.
The
Bank’s investment portfolio consists of mortgage-backed pass-through securities,
tax-exempt securities and corporate bonds. The Bank does not invest in
collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”). All corporate bonds have a
Standard and Poor’s or Moody’s rating of A-1 or better when
purchased. The September 30, 2010 total investment portfolio has a
combined average credit rating of AA.
The
carrying value of investment securities pledged to secure public funds on
deposit and for other purposes as required by law was $108,620,000 and
$117,377,000 as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively.
At
September 30, 2010, we had $2,213,000 in federal funds sold, compared with
$680,000 at December 31, 2009.
Loans
We had
total loans of $1,345,502,000 at September 30, 2010, an increase of
$138,418,000, or 11.47%, compared to $1,207,084,000 at December 31,
2009. At September 30, 2010, 50% of our loans were in our Birmingham
offices, 24% in our Huntsville offices, 15% in our Montgomery offices, and 11%
in our Dothan office.
24
The
following table details our loans at September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009:
September 30,
2010
|
December 31,
2009
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
Commercial,
financial and agricultural
|
$ | 510,176 | $ | 461,088 | ||||
Real
estate - construction (1)
|
217,666 | 224,178 | ||||||
Real
estate - mortgage:
|
||||||||
Owner
occupied
|
259,224 | 203,983 | ||||||
1-4
Family
|
192,145 | 165,512 | ||||||
Other
|
132,819 | 119,749 | ||||||
Total
Real Estate Mortgage
|
584,188 | 489,244 | ||||||
Consumer
|
33,472 | 32,574 | ||||||
Total
Loans
|
1,345,502 | 1,207,084 | ||||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
(16,903 | ) | (14,737 | ) | ||||
Total
Loans, Net
|
$ | 1,328,599 | $ | 1,192,347 |
|
(1)
|
includes
Owner Occupied real estate construction loans in the amount of $4,911 and
$10,045 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively
|
Asset Quality
We
establish and maintain the allowance for loan losses at levels management deems
adequate to absorb anticipated credit losses from identified and otherwise
inherent risks in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. In assessing
the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management considers its
evaluation of the loan portfolio, past due loan experience, collateral values,
current economic conditions and other factors considered necessary to maintain
the allowance at an adequate level. Management believes that the
allowance is adequate at September 30, 2010.
A loan is
considered impaired when it is probable, based on current information and
events, that the Company will be unable to collect all principal and interest
payments due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
Impaired loans are measured by the present value of expected future cash flows
discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market
price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral-dependent.
The amount of impairment, if any, and subsequent changes in impairments are
included in the allowance for loan losses. Interest on accruing impaired loans
is recognized as long as such loans do not meet the criteria for non-accrual
status. At September 30, 2010, we evaluated $53,841,000 in loans for
impairment, including all non-accrual loans. As a result of such evaluation,
$3,671,000 of the Company’s allowance for loan losses was specifically allocated
to $17,461,000 of these loans as impairment. During the third quarter
of 2010, $3,004,000 in loans received specific allocations of the allowance for
loan losses for the first time. At December 31, 2009, we evaluated
$21,524,000 of the Company’s loans for impairment, including all nonaccrual
loans. As a result of such evaluation, $3,082,000 of the Company’s
allowance for loan losses was specifically allocated to $11,085,000 of these
loans as impairment. The increase in impaired loans from December 31,
2009 to September 30, 2010 relates to management’s determination to increase the
number of loans evaluated on a loan-by-loan basis to encompass all loans
classified as substandard or below (see “Provision for Loan Losses” below),
coupled with prevailing economic conditions.
The
following table presents a summary of changes in the allowances for loan losses
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The largest balance of our charge-offs during the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2010, $1,586,000 and $1,924,000,
respectively, were in real estate construction loans. $1,515,000 of
the charge-offs in real estate construction loans during the three months ended
September 30, 2010 were of residential lot development loans. Real
estate construction loans represent 16.17% of our loan portfolio at September
30, 2010.
25
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
(In Thousands)
|
(In Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$ | 15,713 | $ | 13,567 | $ | 14,737 | $ | 10,602 | ||||||||
Charge-offs:
|
||||||||||||||||
Commercial,
financial and agricultural
|
- | (1,089 | ) | (1,013 | ) | (1,897 | ) | |||||||||
Real
estate - construction
|
(820 | ) | (832 | ) | (2,744 | ) | (2,040 | ) | ||||||||
Real
estate - mortgage:
|
||||||||||||||||
Owner
Occupied
|
- | - | (548 | ) | - | |||||||||||
1-4
family mortgage
|
(535 | ) | (172 | ) | (1,229 | ) | (212 | ) | ||||||||
Other
|
- | (9 | ) | - | (9 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
real estate mortgage
|
(535 | ) | (181 | ) | (1,777 | ) | (221 | ) | ||||||||
Consumer
|
(5 | ) | (81 | ) | (79 | ) | (167 | ) | ||||||||
Total
charge-offs
|
(1,360 | ) | (2,183 | ) | (5,613 | ) | (4,325 | ) | ||||||||
Recoveries:
|
||||||||||||||||
Commercial,
financial and agricultural
|
3 | - | 97 | - | ||||||||||||
Real
estate - construction
|
6 | - | 50 | 39 | ||||||||||||
Real
estate - mortgage:
|
||||||||||||||||
Owner
Occupied
|
- | - | 12 | - | ||||||||||||
1-4
family mortgage
|
- | - | 3 | - | ||||||||||||
Other
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Total
real estate mortgage
|
- | - | 15 | - | ||||||||||||
Consumer
|
4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Total
recoveries
|
13 | 3 | 167 | 42 | ||||||||||||
Net
charge-offs
|
(1,347 | ) | (2,180 | ) | (5,446 | ) | (4,283 | ) | ||||||||
Provision
for loan losses charged to expense
|
2,537 | 3,209 | 7,612 | 8,277 | ||||||||||||
Balance,
end of period
|
$ | 16,903 | $ | 14,596 | $ | 16,903 | $ | 14,596 | ||||||||
As
a percent of year to date average loans:
|
||||||||||||||||
Annualized
net charge-offs
|
0.41 | % | 0.76 | % | 0.58 | % | 0.54 | % | ||||||||
Annualized
provision for loan losses
|
0.77 | % | 1.12 | % | 0.81 | % | 1.04 | % |
The
following table presents the allocation of the allowance for loan losses for
each respective loan category with the corresponding percentage of loans in each
category to total loans. We believe the comprehensive allowance analysis
performed by our credit administration group is in compliance with all current
regulatory guidelines.
26
September 30, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
September 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
Percentage of
Loans in
Each
Category of
Total Loans
|
Amount
|
Percentage of
Loans in
Each
Category of
Total Loans
|
Amount
|
Percentage of
Loans in
Each
Category of
Total Loans
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(In Thousands)
|
(In Thousands)
|
(In Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial,
financial and agricultural
|
$ | 4,709 | 37.92 | % | $ | 3,058 | 38.20 | % | $ | 3,252 | 38.15 | % | ||||||||||||
Real
estate - construction
|
6,274 | 16.18 | % | 6,295 | 18.57 | % | 6,290 | 19.74 | % | |||||||||||||||
Real
estate - mortgage
|
804 | 43.42 | % | 1,242 | 40.53 | % | 895 | 39.51 | % | |||||||||||||||
Consumer
|
79 | 2.48 | % | 1 | 2.70 | % | 2 | 2.60 | % | |||||||||||||||
Other
|
5,037 | - | 4,141 | - | 4,157 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 16,903 | 100.00 | % | $ | 14,737 | 100.00 | % | $ | 14,596 | 100.00 | % |
Nonperforming Assets
It is our
policy to classify loans as non-accrual when they are past due in principal or
interest payments for more than 90 days or if we believe it is otherwise not
reasonable to expect collection of principal and interest due under the original
terms. Exceptions are allowed for 90-day past due loans when such loans are
secured by real estate or negotiable collateral and are in the process of
collection. Generally, payments received on non-accrual loans are applied
directly to principal.
Nonperforming
assets, comprising non-accrual loans, loans 90 days or more past due and still
accruing, other real estate owned (“OREO”), and troubled debt restructurings in
which the loan was not current when the terms were restructured, totaled
$22,585,000 at September 30, 2010, compared to $24,713,000 at December 31, 2009
and $29,321,000 at September 30, 2009. Non-accrual loans were $14,306,000 at
September 30, 2010, an increase of $2,385,000 from non-accrual loans of
$11,921,000 at December 31, 2009 and an increase of $512,000 from non-accrual
loans of $13,794,000 at September 30, 2009. Loans 90 days past due
and still accruing totaled $109,000 at September 30, 2010, compared to $267,000
at December 31, 2009 and $1,324,000 at September 30, 2009.
A summary
of nonperforming assets as of September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and
September 30, 2009 follows:
September 30,
2010
|
December 31,
2009
|
September 30,
2009
|
||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Nonaccrual
loans
|
$ | 14,306 | $ | 11,921 | $ | 13,794 | ||||||
Past
due 90 days and still accruing
|
109 | 267 | 1,324 | |||||||||
All
other real estate owned
|
8,170 | 12,525 | 13,453 | |||||||||
Troubled
debt restructures
|
- | - | 750 | |||||||||
Total
non-performing assets
|
$ | 22,585 | $ | 24,713 | $ | 29,321 |
At
September 30, 2010, we had one troubled debt restructure that was current at the
time it was restructured, and is performing under the terms of the restructured
agreement at this time. This loan has a carrying value of
$660,000.
27
The
increase in nonaccrual loans from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010 was
primarily the result of additions to nonaccrual status in commercial loans and
acquisition, development and construction loans. The decrease in OREO
from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010 was the result of sales exceeding
amounts transferred in, and, to a lesser extent, write-downs in the value of
OREO.
At
September 30, 2010, total nonperforming assets included finished and unfinished
homes of $4,421,000, residential lots of $9,389,000, raw land of $4,189,000 and
commercial buildings of $1,386,000. Our OREO procedures currently determine
disposition value, the value used to place the property into OREO, based on the
most recent fair value appraisal of the property that we have at the time, less
estimated costs to sell the property.
Deposits
Total
deposits increased $169,202,000, or 11.81%, to $1,601,557,000 at September 30,
2010 compared to $1,432,355,000 at December 31, 2009. This increase
in deposits is a result of organic growth within our Montgomery and Dothan,
Alabama markets. We anticipate long-term sustainable growth in
deposits through continued development of market share in our less mature
markets and through organic growth in all of our markets.
For
amounts and rates of our deposits by category, see the table “Average
Consolidated Balance Sheets and Net Interest Analysis on a Fully Taxable
Equivalent Basis” under the subheading “Net Interest Income”
Other Borrowings
On March
19, 2008, we borrowed $20.0 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta,
of which $10.0 million bears interest at 2.995% per annum and is payable on
March 19, 2012, and $10.0 million bears interest at 3.275% per annum and is
payable on March 19, 2013. As discussed in Note 9 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements, we borrowed $15.5 million through the issuance of trust
preferred securities and the related debenture on September 2,
2008. Both financial instruments bear an identical annual rate of
interest of 8.50% and pay interest on March 1, June 1, September 1 and December
1 of each year. The current book value of this borrowing is $15.3
million as a result of amortization of the discount associated with 75,000
warrants issued to the holders of the Preferred Securities. As
discussed in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we borrowed $15.0
million through the issuance of trust preferred securities and the related
debenture on March 15, 2010. Both financial instruments bear an
identical rate of interest of 6.00% and pay interest on March 15, June 15,
September 15 and December 15 of each year. As discussed in Note 11 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements, on June 23, 2009, the Bank issued a $5.0
million subordinated note due June 1, 2016 in a private
placement. The note bears interest at an annual rate of 8.25%,
payable on March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1 of each
year.
Liquidity
Liquidity
is defined as our ability to generate sufficient cash to fund current loan
demand, deposit withdrawals, or other cash demands and disbursement needs, and
otherwise to operate on an ongoing basis.
28
The
retention of existing deposits and attraction of new deposit sources through new
and existing customers are critical to our liquidity position. If our liquidity
were to decline due to a run-off in deposits, we have procedures that provide
for certain actions under varying liquidity conditions. These actions include
borrowing from existing correspondent banks, selling or participating loans, and
curtailing loan commitments and funding. At September 30, 2010,
liquid assets, which are represented by cash and due from banks, federal funds
sold and unpledged available-for-sale securities, totaled $351
million. Additionally, the Bank had additional borrowing availability
of approximately $328 million in unused federal funds lines of credit with
regional banks, subject to certain restrictions and collateral requirements, and
had additional borrowing availability of $3 million at the Federal Home Loan
Bank of Atlanta to meet short-term funding needs. We believe these sources of
funding are adequate to meet immediate anticipated funding needs, but we will
need additional capital to maintain our current growth. Our management meets on
a quarterly basis to review sources and uses of funding to determine the
appropriate strategy to ensure an appropriate level of liquidity. At the current
time, our long-term liquidity needs primarily relate to funds required to
support loan originations and commitments and deposit withdrawals. Our regular
sources of funding are from the growth of our deposit base, repayment of
principal and interest on loans, the sale of loans and the renewal of time
deposits. In addition, we have issued debt as described above under
“Other Borrowings”.
We are
subject to general FDIC guidelines that require a minimum level of liquidity. We
believe our liquidity ratios meet or exceed these guidelines. We are not
currently aware of any trends or demands that are reasonably likely to result in
liquidity materially increasing or decreasing.
The
following table reflects the contractual maturities of our term liabilities as
of September 30, 2010. The amounts shown do not reflect any early withdrawal or
prepayment assumptions.
Payments due by Period
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
1 year or less
|
Over 1 - 3
years
|
Over 3 - 5
years
|
Over 5 years
|
||||||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual
Obligations (1)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits
without a stated maturity
|
$ | 1,336,670 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
Certificates
of deposit (2)
|
264,887 | 190,621 | 58,067 | 16,199 | - | |||||||||||||||
FHLB
borrowings
|
20,000 | - | 20,000 | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Subordinated
debentures
|
30,384 | - | - | - | 30,384 | |||||||||||||||
Subordinated
note payable
|
4,933 | - | - | - | 4,933 | |||||||||||||||
Operating
lease commitments
|
17,118 | 1,804 | 3,660 | 3,781 | 7,873 | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,673,992 | $ | 192,425 | $ | 81,727 | $ | 19,980 | $ | 43,190 |
(1) Excludes
interest
(2) Certificates
of deposit give customers the right to early withdrawal. Early
withdrawals may be subject to penalties.
The
penalty amount depends on the remaining time to maturity at the time of early
withdrawal.
Capital Adequacy
In the
first quarter of 2010, we formed ServisFirst Capital Trust II, which issued
15,000 shares of its 6.0% Mandatory Convertible Trust Preferred Securities (the
“Preferred Securities”) for $15,000,000 on March 15, 2010. The Trust
invested all of the proceeds from the sale of the Trust Securities in the
Company’s 6.0% Junior Subordinated Mandatory Convertible Deferrable Interest
Debentures due March 15, 2040 in the principal amount of $15,050,000 (the
“Subordinated Debentures”). The Preferred Securities were offered and
sold to accredited investors in a private placement. The Federal
Reserve Board has deemed these securities to qualify as Tier 1 capital of the
Company up to 25% of Tier 1 capital elements. See Note 10 to the
consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the issuance and
sale of the Preferred Securities.
29
As of
September 30, 2010, our most recent notification from the FDIC categorized us as
well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To
remain categorized as well-capitalized, we must maintain minimum total
risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as disclosed in the
table below. We believe that we are well-capitalized under the prompt corrective
action provisions as of September 30, 2010.
The
following table sets forth (i) the capital ratios required by the FDIC and the
Alabama Banking Department’s leverage ratio requirement and (ii) our actual
ratios of capital to total regulatory or risk-weighted assets, as of September
30, 2010, December 31, 2009, and September 30, 2009:
Actual
|
For Capital Adequacy
Purposes
|
To Be Well Capitalized
Under Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(In Thousands)
|
(In Thousands)
|
(In Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
As
of September 30, 2010:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$ | 161,277 | 11.75 | % | $ | 109,791 | 8.00 | % | $ | 137,239 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||
ServisFirst
Bank
|
161,082 | 11.74 | % | 109,736 | 8.00 | % | 137,170 | 10.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier
1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
139,441 | 10.16 | % | 54,895 | 4.00 | % | 82,343 | 6.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
ServisFirst
Bank
|
139,246 | 10.15 | % | 54,868 | 4.00 | % | 82,302 | 6.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier
1 Capital to Average Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
139,441 | 8.06 | % | 54,895 | 4.00 | % | 68,619 | 5.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
ServisFirst
Bank
|
139,246 | 8.05 | % | 54,868 | 4.00 | % | 68,585 | 5.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
As
of December 31, 2009:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$ | 130,708 | 10.47 | % | $ | 99,903 | 8.00 | % | $ | 124,879 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||
ServisFirst
Bank
|
130,252 | 10.44 | % | 99,851 | 8.00 | % | 124,814 | 10.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier
1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
111,049 | 8.89 | % | 49,952 | 4.00 | % | 74,927 | 6.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
ServisFirst
Bank
|
110,593 | 8.86 | % | 49,926 | 4.00 | % | 74,888 | 6.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier
1 Capital to Average Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
111,049 | 6.97 | % | 63,767 | 4.00 | % | 79,709 | 5.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
ServisFirst
Bank
|
110,593 | 6.94 | % | 63,737 | 4.00 | % | 79,672 | 5.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
As
of September 30, 2009:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$ | 128,371 | 10.99 | % | $ | 93,477 | 8.00 | % | $ | 116,846 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||
ServisFirst
Bank
|
127,649 | 10.93 | % | 93,421 | 8.00 | % | 116,777 | 10.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier
1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
108,857 | 9.32 | % | 46,738 | 4.00 | % | 70,108 | 6.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
ServisFirst
Bank
|
108,135 | 9.26 | % | 46,711 | 4.00 | % | 70,066 | 6.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier
1 Capital to Average Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
108,857 | 7.64 | % | 57,017 | 4.00 | % | 71,272 | 5.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
ServisFirst
Bank
|
108,135 | 7.59 | % | 56,987 | 4.00 | % | 71,234 | 5.00 | % |
30
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
In the
normal course of business we are a party to financial instruments with
off-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of our customers. These
financial instruments include commitments to extend credit beyond current
fundings, credit card arrangements, standby letters of credit, and financial
guarantees. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of
credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in our balance sheet. The
contract or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of
involvement we have in those particular financial instruments.
Our
exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to
such financial instruments is represented by the contractual or notional amount
of those instruments. We use the same credit policies in making commitments and
conditional obligations as we do for on-balance sheet instruments.
Financial
instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk at September 30, 2010
are as follows:
(In Thousands)
|
||||
Commitments
to extend credit
|
$ | 513,817 | ||
Credit
card arrangements
|
23,621 | |||
Standby
letters of credit
|
39,858 | |||
$ | 577,296 |
Commitments
to extend credit beyond current fundings are agreements to lend to a customer as
long as there is no violation of any condition established in the applicable
loan agreement. Such commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other
termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the
commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total
commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. We
evaluate each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of
collateral obtained if deemed necessary by us upon extension of credit is based
on our management’s credit evaluation. Collateral held varies but may include
accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and
income-producing commercial properties.
Standby
letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by us to guarantee the
performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily
issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including
commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. All letters of
credit are due within one year or less of the original commitment date. The
credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as
that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.
31
Results
of Operations
Summary of Net Income
Net
income for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was $4,799,000, compared to
net income of $1,608,000 for the three months ended September 30,
2009. Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was
$12,833,000, compared to net income of $3,887,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. The increase in net income was primarily
attributable to a higher net interest margin and an improved efficiency
ratio. Net interest income for the three months ended September 30,
2010 increased by 39.70% to $15,987,000, compared to $11,444,000 for the same
period in 2009. Net interest income for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 increased by 49.08% to $46,201,000, compared to $30,990,000
for the same period in 2009. Operating expenses for the three months
ended September 30, 2010 increased by 7.10% to $7,467,000, compared to
$6,972,000 in 2009, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 increased
by 10.71% to $22,460,000, compared to $20,287,000 in 2009. The
provision for loan losses decreased by $672,000, to $2,537,000, for the three
months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, and
decreased by $665,000, to $7,612,000, for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 compared to the same period in 2009. Noninterest income
increased by $381,000, to $1,348,000, for the three months ended September 30,
2010 compared to the same period in 2009, and increased by $315,000, to
$3,484,000, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same
period in 2009. Basic and diluted net income per common share were
$.87 and $.77, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2010,
compared to $.29 and $.28, respectively, for the same period in
2009. Basic and diluted net income per common share were $2.33 and
$2.11, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to
$.71 and $.67, respectively, for the same period in 2009. Return on
average assets for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was 1.10%
and 1.06%, respectively, compared to 0.45% and 0.60% in 2009, and return on
average stockholders’ equity for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010 was 16.86% and 16.12%, respectively, compared to 6.75% and 8.60% in
2009.
Net Interest Income
Net
interest income is the difference between the income earned on interest-earning
assets and interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities used to support such
assets. The major factors which affect net interest income are changes in
volumes, the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing
liabilities. Our management’s ability to respond to changes in interest rates by
effective asset-liability management techniques is critical to maintaining the
stability of the net interest margin and the momentum of our primary source of
earnings.
Taxable-equivalent
net interest income increased $4,458,000, or 37.88%, to $16,227,000 for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $11,769,000 in 2009, and
increased $15,522,000, or 49.38%, to $46,958,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 compared to $31,436,000 in 2009. These increases
were attributable to growth in interest-earning assets, higher yields on loans,
and lower rates paid on interest-bearing deposits. The
taxable-equivalent yield on interest-earning assets increased to 4.77% for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 from 4.68% for the same period in 2009,
and increased to 4.97% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from 4.78%
for the same period in 2009. The yield on loans for the three months
ended September 30, 2010 was 5.35% compared to 5.10% for the same period in
2009, and was 5.35% compared to 5.09% for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively. Loan fees included in the yield
calculation increased to $189,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010
from $145,000 for the same period in 2009, and increased to $587,000 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $454,000 for the same period in
2009. The cost of total interest-bearing liabilities decreased to
1.13% for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from 1.56% for the same
period in 2009, and to 1.15% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from
1.73% for the same period in 2009. The higher interest rates paid on
the subordinated debentures sold in June 2009, 8.25%, and on the junior
subordinated mandatory convertible debentures sold in March 2010, 6.00%, limited
the decrease in the average rate paid on interest-bearing
liabilities.
32
The
following tables show, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the
average balances of each principal category of our assets, liabilities and
stockholders’ equity, and an analysis of net interest revenue. The
accompanying tables reflect
changes in our net interest margin as a result of changes in the volume and rate
of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the same
periods. Changes as a result of mix or the number of days in the
periods have been allocated to the volume and rate changes in proportion to the
relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in
each. The tables are presented on a taxable-equivalent basis
if applicable:
Average
Balance Sheets and Net Interest Analysis
On
a Fully Taxable-Equivalent Basis
For
the Three Months Ended September 30,
(dollars
in thousands)
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Average
Balance
|
Interest
Earned /
Paid
|
Average
Yield /
Rate
|
Average
Balance
|
Interest
Earned /
Paid
|
Average
Yield /
Rate
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans,
net of unearned income (1)
|
$ | 1,309,007 | $ | 17,644 | 5.35 | % | $ | 1,133,506 | $ | 14,560 | 5.10 | % | ||||||||||||
Mortgage
loans held for sale
|
8,485 | 72 | 3.37 | 3,329 | 38 | 4.53 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investment
securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable
|
175,493 | 1,575 | 3.56 | 77,267 | 1,154 | 5.93 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt
(2)
|
59,144 | 821 | 5.51 | 41,835 | 579 | 5.49 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
investment securities (3)
|
234,637 | 2,396 | 4.05 | 119,102 | 1,733 | 5.77 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
60,380 | 31 | 0.20 | 126,321 | 77 | 0.24 | ||||||||||||||||||
Restricted
equity securities
|
4,024 | 18 | 1.77 | 3,241 | 9 | 1.10 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
balances with banks
|
64,409 | 38 | 0.23 | 5,397 | - | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
$ | 1,680,942 | $ | 20,199 | 4.77 | % | $ | 1,390,896 | $ | 16,417 | 4.68 | % | ||||||||||||
Noninterest-earning
assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
24,652 | 19,357 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
fixed assets and equipment
|
4,782 | 4,701 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for loan losses, accrued
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
interest
and other assets
|
20,278 | 10,478 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 1,730,654 | $ | 1,425,432 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities
and stockholders' equity:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
$ | 266,553 | $ | 296 | 0.44 | % | $ | 165,781 | $ | 369 | 0.88 | % | ||||||||||||
Savings
deposits
|
3,251 | 4 | 0.49 | 991 | 1 | 0.40 | ||||||||||||||||||
Money
market accounts
|
814,769 | 1,658 | 0.81 | 741,626 | 2,202 | 1.18 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time
deposits
|
257,293 | 1,155 | 1.78 | 232,474 | 1,459 | 2.49 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fed
funds purchased
|
- | - | 0.00 | - | - | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other
borrowings
|
55,298 | 859 | 6.16 | 40,093 | 617 | 6.11 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
$ | 1,397,164 | $ | 3,972 | 1.13 | $ | 1,180,965 | $ | 4,648 | 1.56 | ||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing
liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing
demand deposits
|
217,086 | 146,164 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
liabilities
|
3,502 | 3,725 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders'
equity
|
106,919 | 92,959 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
gains on
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
securities
and derivatives
|
5,983 | 1,619 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
stockholders'
equity
|
$ | 1,730,654 | $ | 1,425,432 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest spread
|
3.64 | % | 3.12 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest margin
|
3.83 | % | 3.36 | % |
(1)
|
Non-accrual
loans are included in average loan balances in all
periods. Loan fees of $189,000 and $145,000 are included in
interest income in 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
|
(2)
|
Interest
income and yields are presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis using
a tax rate of 35%.
|
(3)
|
Unrealized
gains of $9,204,000 and $2,453,000 are excluded from the yield calculation
in 2010 and 2009, respectively.
|
33
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||||||
2010 Compared to 2009 Increase
(Decrease) in Interest Income and Expense
Due to Changes in:
|
||||||||||||
Volume
|
Rate
|
Total
|
||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Interest-earning
assets:
|
||||||||||||
Loans,
net of unearned income
|
$ | 2,339 | $ | 745 | $ | 3,084 | ||||||
Mortgages
held for sale
|
46 | (12 | ) | 34 | ||||||||
Investment
securities:
|
||||||||||||
Securities
- taxable
|
1,022 | (601 | ) | 421 | ||||||||
Securities
- tax-exempt
|
240 | 2 | 242 | |||||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
(35 | ) | (11 | ) | (46 | ) | ||||||
Restricted
equity securities
|
3 | 6 | 9 | |||||||||
Interest-bearing
balances with banks
|
- | 38 | 38 | |||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
$ | 3,615 | $ | 167 | $ | 3,782 | ||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
$ | 163 | $ | (236 | ) | $ | (73 | ) | ||||
Savings
|
3 | - | 3 | |||||||||
Money
market accounts
|
201 | (745 | ) | (544 | ) | |||||||
Time
deposits
|
143 | (447 | ) | (304 | ) | |||||||
Fed
funds purchased
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Other
borrowed funds
|
236 | 6 | 242 | |||||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
$ | 746 | $ | (1,422 | ) | $ | (676 | ) | ||||
Increases
in net interest income
|
$ | 2,869 | $ | 1,589 | $ | 4,458 |
34
Average
Balance Sheets and Net Interest Analysis
On
a Fully Taxable-Equivalent Basis
For
the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars
in thousands)
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Average
Balance
|
Interest
Earned /
Paid
|
Average
Yield /
Rate
|
Average
Balance
|
Interest
Earned /
Paid
|
Average
Yield /
Rate
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans,
net of unearned income (1)
|
$ | 1,261,839 | $ | 50,521 | 5.35 | % | $ | 1,064,027 | $ | 40,477 | 5.09 | % | ||||||||||||
Mortgage
loans held for sale
|
5,386 | 148 | 3.67 | 6,459 | 213 | 4.41 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investment
securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable
|
178,975 | 4,997 | 3.73 | 74,058 | 3,117 | 5.63 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt
(2)
|
57,129 | 2,407 | 5.63 | 35,307 | 1,468 | 5.56 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
investment securities (3)
|
236,104 | 7,404 | 4.19 | 109,365 | 4,585 | 5.61 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
30,891 | 49 | 0.21 | 79,145 | 148 | 0.25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Restricted
equity securities
|
3,933 | 43 | 1.46 | 3,053 | 10 | 0.44 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
balances with banks
|
26,900 | 49 | 0.24 | 9,109 | 20 | 0.29 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
$ | 1,565,053 | $ | 58,214 | 4.97 | % | $ | 1,271,158 | $ | 45,453 | 4.78 | % | ||||||||||||
Noninterest-earning
assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
24,080 | 18,359 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
fixed assets and equipment
|
5,013 | 4,224 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for loan losses, accrued
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
interest
and other assets
|
21,889 | 9,381 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 1,616,035 | $ | 1,303,122 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities
and stockholders' equity:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
$ | 244,244 | $ | 917 | 0.50 | % | $ | 153,727 | $ | 1,248 | 1.09 | % | ||||||||||||
Savings
deposits
|
2,514 | 10 | 0.53 | 909 | 4 | 0.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Money
market accounts
|
753,443 | 4,337 | 0.77 | 682,205 | 6,943 | 1.36 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time
deposits
|
249,757 | 3,531 | 1.89 | 206,830 | 4,196 | 2.71 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fed
funds purchased
|
6,552 | 31 | 0.63 | - | - | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other
borrowings
|
51,125 | 2,430 | 6.35 | 36,887 | 1,626 | 5.89 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
$ | 1,307,635 | $ | 11,256 | 1.15 | $ | 1,080,558 | $ | 14,017 | 1.73 | ||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing
liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing
demand
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
deposits
|
198,028 | 127,564 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
liabilites
|
3,957 | 3,782 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders'
equity
|
102,745 | 89,839 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
gains on
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
securities
and derivatives
|
3,670 | 1,379 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
stockholders'
equity
|
$ | 1,616,035 | $ | 1,303,122 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest spread
|
3.82 | % | 3.05 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest margin
|
4.01 | % | 3.31 | % |
(1)
|
Non-accrual
loans are included in average loan balances in all
periods. Loan fees of $587,000 and $454,000 are included in
interest income in 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
|
(2)
|
Interest
income and yields are presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis using
a tax rate of 34%.
|
(3)
|
Unrealized
gains of $5,609,000 and $1,992,000 are excluded from the yield calculation
in 2010 and 2009, respectively.
|
35
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||||||
2010 Compared to 2009 Increase
(Decrease) in Interest Income and Expense
Due to Changes in:
|
||||||||||||
Volume
|
Rate
|
Total
|
||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Interest-earning
assets:
|
||||||||||||
Loans,
net of unearned income
|
$ | 7,833 | $ | 2,211 | $ | 10,044 | ||||||
Mortgages
held for sale
|
(32 | ) | (33 | ) | (65 | ) | ||||||
Investment
securities:
|
||||||||||||
Securities
- taxable
|
3,214 | (1,334 | ) | 1,880 | ||||||||
Securities
- tax-exempt
|
919 | 20 | 939 | |||||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
(79 | ) | (19 | ) | (98 | ) | ||||||
Restricted
equity securities
|
4 | 29 | 33 | |||||||||
Interest-bearing
balances with banks
|
32 | (4 | ) | 28 | ||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
$ | 11,891 | $ | 870 | $ | 12,761 | ||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
529 | (860 | ) | (331 | ) | |||||||
Savings
|
6 | - | 6 | |||||||||
Money
market accounts
|
664 | (3,270 | ) | (2,606 | ) | |||||||
Time
deposits
|
764 | (1,429 | ) | (665 | ) | |||||||
Fed
funds purchased
|
15 | 16 | 31 | |||||||||
Other
borrowed funds
|
669 | 135 | 804 | |||||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
$ | 2,647 | $ | (5,408 | ) | $ | (2,761 | ) | ||||
Increases
in net interest income
|
$ | 9,244 | $ | 6,278 | $ | 15,522 |
Provision for Loan Losses
The
provision expense for loan losses represents the amount determined by management
to be necessary to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level capable of
absorbing inherent losses in the loan portfolio. Our management reviews the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis. The allowance
for loan losses calculation is segregated into various segments that include
classified loans, loans with specific allocations and pass rated loans. A pass
rated loan is generally characterized by a very low to average risk of default
and is a loan in which management perceives there is a minimal risk of loss.
Loans are rated using a nine-point risk grade scale, with loan officers having
the primary responsibility for assigning risk grades and for the timely
reporting of changes in the risk grades. These processes, the assigned risk
grades, and the criticized and classified loans in the portfolio are segregated
into the following regulatory classifications: Special Mention, Substandard,
Doubtful or Loss. Impaired loans are reviewed specifically and separately to
determine the appropriate reserve allocation. Our management compares the
investment in an impaired loan with the present value of expected future cash
flow discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s observable
market price or the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is
collateral-dependent, to determine the specific reserve allowance. Reserve
percentages assigned to non-rated loans are based on historical charge-off
experience adjusted for other risk factors. To evaluate the overall adequacy of
the allowance to absorb losses inherent in our loan portfolio, our management
considers historical loss experience based on volume and types of loans, trends
in classifications, volume and trends in delinquencies and non-accruals,
economic conditions and other pertinent information. Based on future
evaluations, additional provisions for loan losses may be necessary to maintain
the allowance for loan losses at an appropriate level.
36
The
provision for loan losses was $2,537,000 for the three months ended September
30, 2010, a decrease of $672,000 from $3,209,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2009. The provision for loan losses was $7,612,000 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010, a decrease of $665,000 from $8,277,000 for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009. We continue to maintain a
proactive approach to credit risk management. Nonperforming loans increased to
$14,415,000, or 1.07% of total loans, at September 30, 2010 from $12,188,000, or
1.01% of total loans, at December 31, 2009, and decreased from $15,868,000, or
1.37% of total loans, at September 30, 2009. Impaired loans increased
to $53,841,000, or 4.00% of total loans, at September 30, 2010. The
increase in impaired loans at September 30, 2010 relates to management’s
determination to increase the number of loans evaluated on a loan-by-loan basis
to encompass all loans classified as substandard or below, coupled with
prevailing economic conditions. The allowance for loan losses totaled
$16,903,000, or 1.26% of loans, net of unearned income, at September 30, 2010,
compared to $14,737,000, or 1.22% of loans, net of unearned income, at December
31, 2009 and $14,596,000, or 1.26% of loans, net of unearned income, at
September 30, 2009.
Noninterest Income
Noninterest
income totaled $1,348,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010, an
increase of $381,000, or 39.40%, compared to the same period in 2009, and
totaled $3,484,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, an increase of
$315,000, or 9.94%, compared to the same period in 2009. Income from
mortgage banking operations for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was
$589,000, up $170,000, or 40.57%, from $419,000 for the same period in 2009, and
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $1,336,000, down $366,000, or
21.50%, from $1,702,000 for the same period in 2009. Recent increases
in mortgage income are reflective of the high refinancing volume due to
historically low interest rates. Income from customer service charges
and fees for the three months ended September 30, 2010 increased $145,000, or
34.61%, to $564,000 from $419,000 for the same period in 2009, and for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 increased $567,000, or 49.26%, to $1,718,000
from $1,151,000 for the same period in 2009. The increase is
primarily due to an increase in transaction accounts from 2009 to
2010. Merchant service fees were $88,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2010, a decrease of $88,000, or 50.10%, compared to $176,000 for
the same period in 2009, and were $287,000 for the nine months ended September
30, 2010, a decrease of $213,000, or 42.62%, compared to $501,000 for the same
period in 2009.
Noninterest
Expense
Noninterest
expense totaled $7,467,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010, an
increase of $495,000, or 7.10%, compared to $6,972,000 in 2009, and totaled
$22,460,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, an increase of
$2,173,000, or 10.71%, compared to $20,287,000 in 2009. The increases
for the three and nine month periods in 2010 over the same periods in 2009 were
primarily due to higher FDIC insurance assessments on our deposits, higher
salary expense and mortgage commissions, higher rent and insurance expense
related to our move into our new headquarters building in Birmingham in July
2009, and higher data processing charges due to increases in the number of
accounts and transaction volume. These increases were partially offset by lower
merchant processing expenses.
Income Tax Expense
Income
tax expense was $2,532,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010
compared to $622,000 for the same period in 2009, and was $6,780,000 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $1,708,000 for the same period
in 2009. Our effective tax rates for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2010 were 34.54% and 34.57%, respectively, compared to 27.89% and 30.53% for
the same periods in 2009. Our primary permanent differences are
related to SFAS 123(R) option expenses and tax-free income. We
increased our marginal accrual rate from 34% to 35% based on anticipated net
income for the full year 2010.
37
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
Like all
financial institutions, we are subject to market risk from changes in interest
rates. Interest rate risk is inherent in the balance sheet due to the mismatch
between the maturities of rate-sensitive assets and rate-sensitive liabilities.
If rates are rising, and the level of rate-sensitive liabilities exceeds the
level of rate-sensitive assets, the net interest margin will be negatively
impacted. Conversely, if rates are falling, and the level of rate-sensitive
liabilities is greater than the level of rate-sensitive assets, the impact on
the net interest margin will be favorable. Managing interest rate risk is
further complicated by the fact that all rates do not change at the same pace;
in other words, short-term rates may be rising while longer-term rates remain
stable. In addition, different types of rate-sensitive assets and rate-sensitive
liabilities react differently to changes in rates.
To manage
interest rate risk, we must take a position on the expected future trend of
interest rates. Rates may rise, fall or remain the same. Our asset-liability
committee develops its view of future rate trends and strives to manage rate
risk within a targeted range by monitoring economic indicators, examining the
views of economists and other experts, and understanding the current status of
our balance sheet. Our annual budget reflects the anticipated rate environment
for the next 12 months. The asset-liability committee conducts a quarterly
analysis of the rate sensitivity position and reports its results to our board
of directors.
The
asset-liability committee thoroughly analyzes the maturities of rate-sensitive
assets and liabilities. This analysis measures the “gap”, which is defined as
the difference between the dollar amount of rate-sensitive assets repricing
during a period and the volume of rate-sensitive liabilities repricing during
the same period. The gap is also expressed as the ratio of rate-sensitive assets
divided by rate-sensitive liabilities. If the ratio is greater than one, the
dollar value of assets exceeds the dollar value of liabilities; the balance
sheet is “asset-sensitive.” Conversely, if the value of liabilities exceeds the
value of assets, the ratio is less than one and the balance sheet is
“liability-sensitive.” Our internal policy requires management to maintain the
gap such that net interest margins will not change more than 10% if interest
rates change 100 basis points or more than 15% if interest rates change 200
basis points.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
CEO and CFO
Certification.
Appearing
as exhibits to this report are Certifications of our Chief Executive Officer
(“CEO”) and our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”). The Certifications are required
to be made by Rule 13a-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the “Exchange Act”). This item contains the information about the evaluation
that is referred to in the Certifications, and the information set forth below
in this Item 4 should be read in conjunction with the Certifications for a more
complete understanding of the Certifications.
38
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures.
We
maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated
to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the
disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and
procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.
We
conducted an evaluation (the “Evaluation”) of the effectiveness of the design
and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures under the supervision
and with the participation of our management, including our CEO and CFO, as of
September 30, 2010. Based upon the Evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded
that, as of September 30, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures are
effective to ensure that material information relating to ServisFirst
Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries is made known to management, including the
CEO and CFO, particularly during the period when our periodic reports are being
prepared.
There
have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to
which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting,
except as previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2009. As disclosed in that report, during the
first quarter of 2010, we discovered a material weakness in our internal control
over financial reporting relating to the treatment in our financial statements
of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s special three-year prepaid
premium assessment for the year ended December 31, 2009. We corrected
this material weakness prior to the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K,
and we have made changes to our internal control over financial reporting that
we believe appropriate to ensure that similar changes in FDIC assessments and
prepayments are accurately reported.
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time
to time we may be a party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary
course of business. We are not currently a party to any material legal
proceedings except as disclosed in Item 3, “Legal Proceedings”, in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and there has
been no material change in any matter described therein.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
Our
business is influenced by many factors that are difficult to predict, involve
uncertainties that may materially affect actual results and are often beyond our
control. We have identified a number of these risk factors in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, which should be taken
into consideration when reviewing the information contained in this report.
There have been no material changes with regard to the risk factors previously
disclosed in the Form 10-K. For other factors that may cause actual results to
differ materially from those indicated in any forward-looking statement or
projection contained in this report, see “Forward-Looking Statements” under Part
1, Item 2 above.
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
All
information required by this Item has previously been reported on Form
8-K.
39
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM
5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
(a)
Exhibit:
31.01
Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a).
31.02
Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a).
32.01
Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350.
32.02
Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
SERVISFIRST
BANCSHARES, INC.
|
|||
Date:
November 1, 2010
|
By
|
/s/
Thomas A. Broughton,
III
|
|
Thomas
A. Broughton, III
|
|||
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|||
Date:
November 1, 2010
|
By
|
/s/
William M. Foshee
|
|
William
M. Foshee
|
|||
Chief Financial
Officer
|
40