Sila Realty Trust, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2015 September (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015

OR

For the transition period from                 to                

Commission File Number: 000-55435

CARTER VALIDUS MISSION CRITICAL

REIT II, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of November 16, 2015, there were approximately 43,268,000 shares of Class A common stock and 0 shares of Class T common stock of Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc. outstanding.

Table of Contents

CARTER VALIDUS MISSION CRITICAL REIT II, INC.

(A Maryland Corporation)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

Table of Contents

PART 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Item 1. Financial Statements.

CARTER VALIDUS MISSION CRITICAL REIT II, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014

(in thousands, except share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

CARTER VALIDUS MISSION CRITICAL REIT II, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014

(in thousands, except share data and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

CARTER VALIDUS MISSION CRITICAL REIT II, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015

(in thousands, except for share data)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

CARTER VALIDUS MISSION CRITICAL REIT II, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014

(in thousands)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

CARTER VALIDUS MISSION CRITICAL REIT II, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

September 30, 2015

Note 1—Organization and Business Operations

Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., or the Company, is a Maryland corporation that was formed on January 11, 2013, which elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or a REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, for federal income tax purposes commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 2014. The Company commenced principal operations on July 3, 2014 when it satisfied the minimum offering requirement and issued approximately 213,333 shares of Class A common stock for gross proceeds of $2,000,000. Substantially all of the Company’s business is conducted through Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP, a Delaware limited partnership, or the Operating Partnership, formed on January 10, 2013. The Company is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC, or the Advisor, is the initial limited partner of the Operating Partnership. As of September 30, 2015, the Company owned a 99.999% interest in the Operating Partnership and the Advisor owned a 0.001% interest in the Operating Partnership.

The Company is offering for sale a maximum of $2,350,000,000 in shares of common stock, consisting of up to $2,250,000,000 of shares in its primary offering and up to $100,000,000 of shares of common stock to be made available pursuant to the Company’s distribution reinvestment plan, or the DRIP, on a “best efforts” basis, or the Offering, pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-11 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act (SEC File Number: 333-191706, effective May 29, 2014), or the Registration Statement. The Company has registered for offering two classes of shares of common stock, Class A shares and Class T shares, in any combination with a dollar value up to the maximum primary offering amount. The initial offering price for the shares in the primary offering is $10.00 per Class A share and $9.574 per Class T share.

As of September 30, 2015, the Company had accepted investors’ subscriptions for and issued approximately 39,073,000 shares of Class A common stock (including shares of common stock issued pursuant to the DRIP) in the Offering, resulting in receipt of gross proceeds of approximately $388,054,000, before selling commissions and dealer manager fees of approximately $36,082,000 and other offering costs of approximately $8,983,000. The Company had special escrow requirements for subscriptions from residents of Washington, the conditions of which were satisfied on September 8, 2014, and Pennsylvania, the conditions of which were satisfied on February 19, 2015. As of September 30, 2015, the Company had approximately $1,961,946,000 in Class A shares and Class T shares of common stock remaining in the Offering.

Substantially all of the Company’s business is managed by the Advisor. Carter Validus Real Estate Management Services II, LLC, or the Property Manager, an affiliate of the Advisor, serves as the Company’s property manager. The Advisor and the Property Manager have received, and will continue to receive, fees for services related to the acquisition and operational stages. The Advisor will also be eligible to receive fees during the liquidation stage. SC Distributors, LLC, or the Dealer Manager, serves as the dealer manager of the Offering. On August 29, 2014, Validus/Strategic Capital Partners, LLC (now known as Strategic Capital Management Holdings, LLC, or SCMH), the indirect parent of the Dealer Manager and the direct parent of Strategic Capital Advisory Services, LLC, was acquired by RCS Capital Corporation, or RCS. SCMH is a nonvoting minority member of the sole owner of the Advisor. The Company believes that there has been no impact to the operations of the Company as a result of this transaction. The Dealer Manager has received and will continue to receive fees for services related to the Offering.

The Company was formed to invest primarily in quality income-producing commercial real estate, with a focus on data centers and healthcare properties, preferably with long-term net leases to investment grade and other creditworthy tenants, as well as to make other real estate-related investments that relate to such property types. Real estate-related investments may include equity or debt interests, including securities, in other real estate entities. The Company also may originate or invest in real estate-related debt. The Company expects real estate-related debt originations and investments to be focused on first mortgage loans, but also may include real estate-related bridge loans, mezzanine loans and securitized debt. As of September 30, 2015, the Company owned 17 real estate investments, consisting of 21 properties located in 13 metropolitan statistical areas, or MSAs, and one micropolitan statistical area.

Except as the context otherwise requires, “we,” “our,” “us,” and the “Company” refer to Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., the Operating Partnership and all wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The summary of significant accounting policies presented below is designed to assist in understanding the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. Such condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto are the representation of management. The accompanying condensed consolidated unaudited financial statements of the

7

Table of Contents

Company have been prepared in accordance with the generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP, for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal and recurring nature considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2015.

The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2014 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 and related notes thereto set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 26, 2015, or the 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the Operating Partnership, and all wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements and accompanying notes in conformity with GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates are made and evaluated on an on-going basis using information that is currently available as well as various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Concentration of Credit Risk and Significant Leases

As of September 30, 2015, the Company had cash on deposit in certain financial institutions which were in excess of current federally insured levels. The Company limits its cash investments to financial institutions with high credit standing; therefore, the Company believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on its cash deposits. To date, the Company has experienced no loss or lack of access to cash in its accounts. Concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable from tenants is limited.

As of September 30, 2015, the Company owned real estate investments in 13 MSAs, four of which accounted for 10.0% or more of rental revenue. Real estate investments located in the Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, Texas MSA, the Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, Texas MSA, the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, Massachusetts-New Hampshire MSA and the Kansas City, Missouri-Kansas MSA accounted for 26.1%, 17.3%, 15.2% and 12.2%, respectively, of rental revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

As of September 30, 2015, the Company had three tenants that accounted for 10.0% or more of rental revenue. The leases with Fort Worth Surgicare Partners, Ltd., the lease with New England Sinai Hospital, A Steward Family Hospital, Inc. and the lease with Heartland Rehabilitation Hospital, LLC accounted for 25.6%, 15.2% and 12.2%, respectively, of rental revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

Share Repurchase Program

The Company’s share repurchase program allows for repurchases of shares of the Company’s common stock when certain criteria are met. The share repurchase program provides that all redemptions during any calendar year, including those redeemable upon death or a qualifying disability of a stockholder, are limited to those that can be funded with proceeds raised from the DRIP Offering during the prior calendar year and other operating funds, if any, as the board of directors, in its sole discretion, may reserve for this purpose.

Repurchases of shares of the Company’s common stock are at the sole discretion of the Company’s board of directors. In addition, the Company’s board of directors, at its sole discretion, may amend, suspend, reduce, terminate or otherwise change the share repurchase program upon 30 days’ prior notice to the Company’s stockholders for any reason it deems appropriate. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company received valid redemption requests related to approximately 15,511 Class A shares of common stock, all of which were redeemed in full for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $155,000 (an average of $9.99 per share).

Earnings Per Share

The Company calculates basic earnings per share by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders for the period by the weighted average shares of its common stock outstanding for that period. Diluted earnings per share are computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding and all potentially dilutive securities. Shares of non-

8

Table of Contents

vested restricted common stock give rise to potentially dilutive shares of common stock. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, there were 15,750 and 9,000 shares, respectively, of non-vested restricted common stock outstanding, but such shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because such shares were anti-dilutive during the periods.

Reportable Segments

Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, 280, Segment Reporting, establishes standards for reporting financial and descriptive information about an enterprise’s reportable segments. As of September 30, 2015, the Company operated through two reportable business segments—commercial real estate investments in data centers and healthcare. With the continued expansion of the Company’s portfolio, segregation of the Company’s operations into two reporting segments is useful in assessing the performance of the Company’s business in the same way that management reviews performance and makes operating decisions. See Note 12—“Segment Reporting” for further discussion on the reportable segments of the Company.

Fair Value

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, or ASC 820, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 emphasizes that fair value is intended to be a market-based measurement, as opposed to a transaction-specific measurement.

Fair value is defined by ASC 820 as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Depending on the nature of the asset or liability, various techniques and assumptions can be used to estimate the fair value. Assets and liabilities are measured using inputs from three levels of the fair value hierarchy, as follows:

Level 1—Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. An active market is defined as a market in which transactions for the assets or liabilities occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2—Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active (markets with few transactions), inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).

Level 3—Unobservable inputs, only used to the extent that observable inputs are not available, reflect the Company’s assumptions about the pricing of an asset or liability.

The following describes the methods the Company used to estimate the fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities:

Cash and cash equivalents, other assets, accounts payable due to affiliates and accounts payable and other liabilities—The Company considers the carrying values of these financial instruments, assets and liabilities to approximate fair value because of the short period of time between origination of the instruments and their expected realization.

Credit facility—The carrying value of the variable rate secured credit facility approximates fair value as the interest on the secured credit facility is calculated at the London Interbank Offered Rate, plus an applicable margin. The interest rate resets to market on a monthly basis. Refer to Note 7—“Credit Facility” in the 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

For the periods presented, comprehensive income (loss) equaled net loss; therefore, a separate statement of comprehensive income (loss) is not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

On May 28, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or the FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, or ASU 2014-09. The objective of ASU 2014-09 is to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for GAAP. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods and services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle, which may require more judgment and estimates within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing GAAP. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) Deferral of the Effective Date, or ASU 2015-14. ASU 2015-14 defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year to fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted as of the original effective date, which was annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and the interim periods within that year. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact ASU 2014-09 will have on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

9

Table of Contents

On February 18, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis, or ASU 2015-02, that changes the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. The amendment affects the following areas: limited partnerships and similar legal entities, evaluating fees paid to a decision maker or a service provider as a variable interest, the effect of fee arrangements on the primary beneficiary determination and certain investment funds. Under the amendment, all reporting entities are within the scope of ASC Subtopic 810-10, Consolidation—Overall, unless a scope exception applies. The presumption that a general partner controls a limited partnership has been eliminated. In addition, fees paid to decision makers that meet certain conditions no longer cause decision makers to consolidate variable interest entities in certain instances. The amendment is effective for public business entities for periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption of ASU 2015-02 is permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact ASU 2015-02 will have on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

On April 7, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, or ASU 2015-03, that intends to simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs. The amendment requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. On August 18, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated With Line-of-Credit Arrangements-Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at June 18, 2015 Emerging Issues Task Force Meeting (SEC Update), or ASU 2015-15, which clarified that the SEC staff would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. Both ASU 2015-03 and ASU 2015-15 are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and are to be applied retrospectively, with early adoption permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact ASU 2015-03 and ASU 2015-15 will have on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

On September 25, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments, or ASU 2015-16, which eliminates the requirement for an acquirer to retrospectively adjust the financial statements for measurement-period adjustments that occur in periods after a business combination is consummated. ASU 2015-16 requires that the acquirer recognize adjustments to the provisional amounts recorded in the reporting period when the adjustments are determined. The effects of adjustments (such as depreciation, amortization, or other income effects) to provisional amounts to periods after the acquisition date are included in the earnings of the current reporting period. The amendment is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of ASU 2015-16 is permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact ASU 2015-16 will have on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

Reclassifications

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current financial statement presentation, with no effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Note 3—Real Estate Investments

During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company completed 11 real estate acquisitions, of which 10 were determined to be business combinations and one was determined to be an asset acquisition. The following table summarizes the consideration transferred for all investments in real estate acquired (amounts in thousands):

Acquisition fees and expenses in connection with the acquisition of properties determined to be business combinations are expensed as incurred, including investment transactions that are no longer under consideration, and are included in acquisition related expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. Acquisition fees and expenses associated with transactions determined to be asset purchases are capitalized. The Company expensed acquisition fees and expenses of approximately $3,760,000 and $269,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014,

10

Table of Contents

respectively, and $7,287,000 and $304,000, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The Company capitalized acquisition fees and expenses of approximately $234,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The total amount of all acquisition fees and costs are limited to 6.0% of the contract purchase price of a property. The contract purchase price is the amount actually paid or allocated in respect of the purchase, development, construction or improvement of a property exclusive of acquisition fees and costs. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, acquisition fees and costs did not exceed 6.0% of the contract purchase price of the Company’s acquisitions during such period.

Note 4—Acquired Intangible Assets, Net

Acquired intangible assets, net, which are included in real estate in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, consisted of the following as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (amounts in thousands, except weighted average life amounts):

Note 5—Other Assets

Other assets consisted of the following as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (amounts in thousands):

Note 6—Future Minimum Rent

The Company’s real estate assets are leased to tenants under operating leases with varying terms. The leases frequently have provisions to extend the terms of the lease agreements. The Company retains substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the real estate assets leased to tenants.

The future minimum rental income from the Company’s investment in real estate assets under non-cancelable operating leases, including optional renewal periods for which exercise is reasonably assured, for the three months ending December 31, 2015 and for each of the next four years ending December 31 and thereafter, are as follows (amounts in thousands):

11

Table of Contents

Note 7—Credit Facility

Significant activity regarding the secured credit facility since December 31, 2014 includes:

Note 8—Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

In the ordinary course of business, the Company may become subject to litigation or claims. As of September 30, 2015, there were, and currently there are, no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party.

Note 9—Related-Party Transactions and Arrangements

The Company reimburses the Advisor and its affiliates for organization and offering expenses it incurs on the Company’s behalf, but only to the extent the reimbursement would not cause the selling commissions, dealer manager fees, distribution fees and other organization and offering expenses to exceed 15% of the gross proceeds of the Offering. The Company expects that organization and offering expenses (other than selling commissions, dealer manager fees, and distribution fees) will be approximately 1.25% of the gross proceeds. As of September 30, 2015, the Advisor and its affiliates incurred approximately $7,678,000 on the Company’s behalf in offering costs. The Company accrued approximately $431,000 of other organization and offering expenses as of September 30, 2015. Other organization expenses are expensed as incurred and offering expenses are charged to stockholders’ equity as incurred or as such amounts are reimbursed to the Advisor.

The Company pays to the Advisor 2.0% of the contract purchase price of each property or asset acquired and 2.0% of the amount advanced with respect to a mortgage loan. For the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred approximately $2,673,000 and $89,000, respectively, in acquisition fees to the Advisor or its affiliates. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred approximately $5,144,000 and $89,000, respectively, in acquisition fees to the Advisor or its affiliates. In addition, the Company reimburses the Advisor for acquisition expenses incurred in connection with the selection and acquisition of properties or other real estate-related investments (including expenses relating to potential investments that the Company does not close), such as legal fees and expenses, costs of real estate due diligence, appraisals, non-refundable option payments on properties not acquired, travel and communications expenses, accounting fees and expenses and title insurance premiums, whether or not the property was acquired. The Company expects these expenses will be approximately 0.75% of the purchase price of each property or real estate-related investment. For the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Advisor incurred approximately $4,000 in acquisition expenses on the Company’s behalf. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Advisor incurred approximately $10,000 and $9,000, respectively, in acquisition expenses on the Company’s behalf.

The Company pays to the Advisor an asset management fee calculated on a monthly basis in an amount equal to 1/12th of 0.75% of gross assets (including amounts borrowed), which is payable monthly in arrears. The Advisor may, in its sole discretion, choose to take any monthly asset management fee in the form of subordinated restricted Class B Units of the Operating Partnership. In the event the Advisor chooses to be compensated in Class B Units, then the Operating Partnership will, within 30 days after the end of the applicable month (subject to the approval of the board of directors), issue a number of restricted Class B Units to the Advisor equal to: (i) the cost of assets multiplied by 0.0625% (or the lower of the cost of assets and the applicable quarterly net asset value, or NAV, multiplied by 0.0625%, once the Company begins calculating NAV) divided by (ii) the value of one Class A share of common stock as of the last day of such calendar month, which will be the offering price, less selling commissions and dealer manager fees, until such time as the Company calculates NAV, when it will then be the per share NAV for Class A shares. The Advisor will be entitled to receive certain distributions of net sales proceeds on the vested and unvested Class B Units it receives in connection with its assets management services at the same rate as distributions received on the Company’s common stock. Such distributions will be in addition to the incentive fees the Advisor and its affiliates may receive from the Company, including, without limitation the subordinated participation in net sales proceeds, the subordinated incentive listing distribution or the subordinated distribution upon termination of the Advisory agreement, as applicable.

Class B Units are subject to forfeiture until such time as: (a) the value of the Operating Partnership’s assets plus all distributions made equals or exceeds the total amount of capital contributed by investors plus a 6.0% cumulative, pretax, non-compounded annual return thereon, or the economic hurdle; (b) any one of the following events occurs concurrently with or subsequently to the achievement of the economic hurdle described above: (i) a listing of the Company’s common stock on a national securities exchange; (ii) a transaction to which the Company or the Operating Partnership shall be a party, as a result of

12

Table of Contents

which operating partnership units or common stock shall be exchanged for or converted into the right, or the holders of such securities shall otherwise be entitled, to receive cash, securities or other property or any combination thereof; or (iii) the termination of the Advisory Agreement without cause; and (c) the Advisor pursuant to the Advisory Agreement is providing services to the Company immediately prior to the occurrence of an event of the type described in clause (b) above, unless the failure to provide such services is attributable to the termination without cause of the Advisory Agreement by an affirmative vote of a majority of the Company’s independent directors after the economic hurdle described above has been met. Any outstanding Class B Units will be forfeited immediately if the Advisory Agreement is terminated for any reason other than a termination without cause. Any outstanding Class B Units will be forfeited immediately if the Advisory Agreement is terminated without cause by an affirmative vote of a majority of the Company’s board of directors before the economic hurdle described above has been met. For the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred approximately $639,000 and $6,000, respectively, in asset management fees. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred approximately $1,133,000 and $6,000, respectively, in asset management fees. As of September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company did not issue any Class B Units.

In connection with the rental, leasing, operation and management of the Company’s properties, the Company pays the Property Manager and its affiliates aggregate fees equal to 3.0% of gross revenues from the properties managed, or property management fees. The Company will reimburse the Property Manager and its affiliates for property-level expenses that any of them pay or incur on the Company’s behalf, including salaries, bonuses and benefits of persons employed by the Property Manager and its affiliates except for the salaries, bonuses and benefits of persons who also serve as one of its executive officers. The Property Manager and its affiliates may subcontract the performance of their duties to third parties and pay all or a portion of the property management fee to the third parties with whom they contract for these services. If the Company contracts directly with third parties for such services, it will pay them customary market fees and may pay the Property Manager an oversight fee equal to 1.0% of the gross revenues of the properties managed. In no event will the Company pay the Property Manager or any affiliate both a property management fee and an oversight fee with respect to any particular property. The Company also will pay the Property Manager a separate fee for the one-time initial rent-up, leasing-up of newly constructed properties or re-leasing to existing tenants in an amount not to exceed the fee customarily charged in arm’s length transactions by others rendering similar services in the same geographic area for similar properties as determined by a survey of brokers and agents in such area and which is typically less than $1,000. For the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred approximately $174,000 and $2,000, respectively, in property management fees to the Property Manager. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred approximately $314,000 and $2,000, respectively, in property management fees to the Property Manager.

For acting as general contractor and/or construction manager to supervise or coordinate projects or to provide major repairs or rehabilitation on our properties, the Company may pay the Property Manager up to 5.0% of the cost of the projects, repairs and/or rehabilitation, as applicable, or construction management fees. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company did not incur any construction management fees.

The Company reimburses the Advisor for all expenses it paid or incurred in connection with the services provided to the Company, subject to certain limitations. The Company will not reimburse the Advisor for personnel costs in connection with services for which the Advisor receives an acquisition fee or a disposition fee. For the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Advisor allocated approximately $223,000 and $98,000, respectively, in operating expenses to the Company. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Advisor allocated approximately $586,000 and $116,000, respectively, in operating expenses to the Company. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Advisor waived approximately $76,000 and $86,000, respectively, of its operating expenses incurred on behalf of the Company, without recourse. The operating expenses waived by the Advisor consisted of general and administrative expenses, including payroll-related expenses.

The Company will pay its Advisor, or its affiliates, if it provides a substantial amount of services (as determined by a majority of the Company’s independent directors) in connection with the sale of properties, a disposition fee, up to the lesser of 1.0% of the contract sales price and one-half of the total brokerage commission paid if a third party broker is also involved, without exceeding the lesser of 6.0% of the contract sales price or a reasonable, customary and competitive real estate commission. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company did not incur any disposition fees to the Advisor or its affiliates.

The Advisor will receive 15% of the remaining net sale proceeds after return of capital contributions plus payment to investors of a 6.0% annual cumulative, non-compounded return on the capital contributed by investors. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company did not incur any subordinated participation in net sale proceeds to the Advisor or its affiliates.

Upon the listing of the Company’s shares on a national securities exchange, which the Company has no intention to do at this time, the Advisor will receive 15.0% of the amount by which the sum of the Company’s adjusted market value plus distributions exceeds the sum of the aggregate capital contributed by investors plus an amount equal to a 6.0% annual cumulative, non-compounded return to investors, or the subordinated incentive listing fee. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company did not incur any subordinated incentive listing fees to the Advisor or its affiliates.

13

Table of Contents

Upon termination or non-renewal of the Advisory Agreement, with or without cause, the Advisor will be entitled to receive distributions from the Operating Partnership equal to 15% of the amount by which the sum of the Company’s adjusted market value plus distributions exceeds the sum of the aggregate capital contributed by investors plus an amount equal to an annual 6.0% cumulative, non-compounded return to investors. In addition, the Advisor may elect to defer its right to receive a subordinated distribution upon termination until either shares of the Company’s common stock are listed and traded on a national securities exchange or another liquidity event occurs. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company did not incur any subordinated termination fees to the Advisor or its affiliates.

Certain affiliates of the Company receive fees in connection with the Offering and will continue to receive fees during the acquisition, management and sale of assets of the Company.

The Company pays the Dealer Manager selling commissions of up to 7.0% of the gross offering proceeds per Class A share and up to 3.0% of gross offering proceeds per Class T share. All selling commissions are expected to be re-allowed to participating broker-dealers. The Company will not pay selling commissions with respect to shares of any class sold pursuant to the DRIP. In addition, the Company pays the Dealer Manager a dealer manager fee of up to 3.0% of gross offering proceeds from the sale of Class A and Class T shares, provided, however that the dealer manager fee the Company pays on the Class T shares may be changed in the future. The dealer manager fee may be partially re-allowed to participating broker-dealers. No dealer manager fees will be paid in connection with purchases of shares made pursuant to the DRIP. For the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred approximately $8,285,000 and $1,523,000, respectively, for selling commissions and dealer manager fees in connection with the Offering to the Dealer Manager. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred approximately $29,606,000 and $1,523,000, respectively, for selling commissions and dealer manager fees in connection with the Offering to the Dealer Manager. In addition, as of September 30, 2015, in connection with advance payments of subscription fees, the outstanding balance due from an affiliate of the Dealer Manager was $106,000.

The Company will pay the Dealer Manager a distribution fee with respect to its Class T shares that are sold in the primary offering that accrues daily in an amount equal to 1/365th of .80% of the amount of the purchase price per share (or, once reported, the net asset value per share for such day) on a continuous basis from year to year. Termination of such payment will commence on the earlier to occur of the following: (i) a listing of the Class T shares on a national securities exchange, (ii) following the completion of the Offering, total underwriting compensation in the Offering equaling 10% of the gross proceeds from the primary portion of the Offering, or (iii) such Class T shares no longer being outstanding. The Dealer Manager may re-allow the distribution fee to participating broker-dealers and servicing broker-dealers. The distribution fee will be paid monthly in arrears. The distribution fee will not be payable with respect to Class T shares issued under the DRIP. The Company will not pay a distribution fee with respect to Class A shares. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company did not incur any distribution fees to the Dealer Manager. The Company filed Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Registration Statement on October 13, 2015, which modified certain terms of the distribution fee.

Accounts Payable Due to Affiliates

The following amounts were outstanding due to affiliates as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (amounts in thousands):

14

Table of Contents

Note 10—Intangible Lease Liabilities, Net

Intangible lease liabilities, net, consisted of the following as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (amounts in thousands, except weighted average life amounts):

Note 11—Business Combinations

During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of 100% of the interests in 10 real estate investments (two data centers and eight healthcare) that were determined to be business combinations, comprised of 16 buildings. The aggregate purchase price of the acquisitions determined to be business combinations was $249,404,000, plus closing costs.

The following table summarizes the acquisitions determined to be business combinations during the nine months ended September 30, 2015:

Results of operations for the acquisitions determined to be business combinations are reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 for the period subsequent to the acquisition date of each property. For the period from the acquisition date through September 30, 2015, the Company recorded $6,029,000 of revenues and a net loss of $4,591,000 for its business combination acquisitions.

The following table summarizes management’s allocation of the fair value of the acquisitions determined to be business combinations during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 (amounts in thousands):

15

Table of Contents

Assuming the business combinations described above had occurred on January 1, 2014, pro forma revenues, net income and net income attributable to common stockholders would have been as follows for the periods listed below (amounts in thousands, unaudited):

The pro forma information for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 was adjusted to exclude approximately $3,730,000 and $7,140,000, respectively, of acquisition fees and costs recorded related to the Company’s real estate investments. The pro forma information may not be indicative of what actual results of operations would have been had the transactions occurred at the beginning of 2014, nor is it necessarily indicative of future operating results.

Note 12—Segment Reporting

Management reviews the performance of individual properties and aggregates individual properties based on operating criteria into two reportable segments—commercial real estate investments in data centers and healthcare, and makes operating decisions based on these two reportable segments. The Company’s commercial real estate investments in data centers and healthcare are based on certain underwriting assumptions and operating criteria, which are different for data centers and healthcare. There were no intersegment sales or transfers during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.

The Company evaluates performance based on net operating income of the individual properties in each segment. Net operating income, a non-GAAP financial measure, is defined as total revenues, less rental expenses, which excludes depreciation and amortization, general and administrative expenses, acquisition related expenses, asset management fees and interest expense. The Company believes that segment net operating income serves as a useful supplement to net income (loss) because it allows investors and management to measure unlevered property-level operating results and to compare operating results to the operating results of other real estate companies and between periods on a consistent basis. Segment net operating income should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) determined in accordance with GAAP as an indicator of financial performance, and accordingly, the Company believes that in order to facilitate a clear understanding of the consolidated historical operating results, segment net operating income should be examined in conjunction with net income (loss) as presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and data included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

General and administrative expenses, acquisition related expenses, asset management fees, depreciation and amortization and interest expense are not allocated to individual segments for purposes of assessing segment performance. Non-segment assets primarily consist of corporate assets, including cash and cash equivalents, real estate and escrow deposits, deferred financing costs and other assets not attributable to individual properties.

16

Table of Contents

Summary information for the reportable segments during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, are as follows (amounts in thousands):

17

Table of Contents

Assets by reportable segments as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are as follows (amounts in thousands):

18

Table of Contents

Capital additions and acquisitions by reportable segments for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows (amounts in thousands):

Note 13—Accounts Payable and Other Liabilities

Accounts payable and other liabilities, as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, were comprised of the following (amounts in thousands):

Note 14—Economic Dependency

The Company is dependent on the Advisor and its affiliates for certain services that are essential to the Company, including the sale of the Company’s shares of common and preferred stock available for issue; the identification, evaluation, negotiation, purchase and disposition of real estate investments and other investments; the management of the daily operations of the Company’s real estate portfolio; and other general and administrative responsibilities. In the event that the Advisor and its affiliates are unable to provide the respective services, the Company will be required to obtain such services from other sources.

Note 15—Subsequent Events

Distributions to Stockholders Paid

On October 1, 2015, the Company paid aggregate distributions of approximately $1,982,000 ($797,000 in cash and $1,185,000 in shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the DRIP), which related to distributions declared for each day in the period from September 1, 2015 through September 30, 2015. On November 2, 2015, the Company paid aggregate distributions of approximately $2,201,000 ($892,000 in cash and $1,309,000 in shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the DRIP), which related to distributions declared for each day in the period from October 1, 2015 through October 31, 2015.

Distributions Declared

On November 5, 2015, the board of directors of the Company approved and declared a distribution to the Company’s stockholders of record as of the close of business on each day of the period commencing on December 1, 2015 and ending on February 29, 2016. The distributions for December 2015 will be calculated based on 365 days in the calendar year and will be equal to $0.001753425 per share of Class A common stock, which is equal to an annualized distribution rate of 6.4%, assuming a purchase price of $10.00 per share of Class A common stock. The distributions for January 2016 and February 2016 will be calculated based on 366 days in the calendar year and will be equal to $0.001748634 per share of Class A common stock, which will be equal to an annualized distribution rate of 6.4%, assuming a purchase price of $10.00 per share of Class A common stock. The distributions declared for each record date in December 2015, January 2016 and February 2016 will be paid in January 2016, February 2016 and March 2016, respectively. As of November 16, 2015, there were no shares of Class T common stock outstanding. The distributions will be payable to stockholders from legally available funds therefor.

Status of the Offering

As of November 16, 2015, the Company had accepted investors’ subscriptions for and issued approximately 43,271,000 shares of Class A common stock in the Offering, resulting in receipt of gross proceeds of approximately $429,637,000, including shares of its common stock issued pursuant to its DRIP. As of November 16, 2015, the Company had approximately $1,920,363,000 in Class A shares and Class T shares of common stock remaining in the Offering.

19

Table of Contents

Acquisition of the Nebraska Healthcare Facility

On October 14, 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of 100% of the interest in a healthcare property, or the Nebraska Healthcare Facility, for a purchase price of $13,011,247, plus closing costs. The Company financed the purchase of the Nebraska Healthcare Facility using net proceeds from the Offering. The Nebraska Healthcare Facility is leased to a single tenant and was determined to be a business combination. With respect to this acquisition, the Company has not completed its fair value-based purchase price allocation; it is therefore impractical to provide pro-forma information.

20

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, and the other unaudited financial information appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The following discussion should also be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements, and the notes thereto, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, on March 26, 2015, or the 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The terms “we,” “our,” and the “Company” refer to Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II, Inc., Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP, or our Operating Partnership, and all wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, other than historical facts, include forward-looking statements that reflect our expectations and projections about our future results, performance, prospects and opportunities. Such statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies, and prospects and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, as well as known and unknown risks, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Therefore, such statements are not intended to be a guarantee of our performance in future periods. Such forward-looking statements can generally be identified by our use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” or other similar words. Forward-looking statements that were true at the time made may ultimately prove to be incorrect or false. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our management’s view only as of the date this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is filed with the SEC. We make no representation or warranty (express or implied) about the accuracy of any such forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and we do not undertake to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. See Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of some, although not all, of the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements.

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On a regular basis, we evaluate these estimates. These estimates are based on management’s historical industry experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

Overview

We were formed on January 11, 2013 under the laws of Maryland to acquire and operate a diversified portfolio of income-producing commercial real estate with a focus on data centers and healthcare properties, preferably with long-term net leases to investment grade and other creditworthy tenants, as well as to make other real estate-related investments that relate to such property types. We commenced principal operations on July 3, 2014 when we satisfied our minimum offering requirement and issued approximately 213,333 shares of our Class A common stock for gross proceeds of $2,000,000. We elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, for federal income tax purposes beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2014. We are offering for sale to the public on a “best efforts” basis a maximum of $2,350,000,000 in shares of common stock, which we refer to as our Offering, which consists of up to $2,250,000,000 of shares in our primary offering and up to $100,000,000 of shares of common stock to be made available pursuant to a distribution reinvestment plan, or the DRIP, pursuant to our registration statement on Form S-11, or our Registration Statement, filed with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, which was declared effective by the SEC on May 29, 2014. We are offering two classes of shares of common stock, Class A shares and Class T shares, in any combination, with a dollar value up to the maximum offering amount. The initial offering price for the shares in our primary offering is $10.00 per Class A share and $9.574 per Class T share.

As of September 30, 2015, we had accepted investors’ subscriptions for and issued approximately 39,073,000 shares of Class A common stock (including shares of common stock issued pursuant to the DRIP) in our Offering, resulting in receipt of gross proceeds of approximately $388,054,000, before selling commissions and dealer manager fees of approximately $36,082,000 and other offering costs of approximately $8,983,000. We had special escrow requirements for subscriptions from residents of Washington, conditions of which were satisfied on September 8, 2014, and Pennsylvania, the conditions of which were satisfied on February 19, 2015. As of September 30, 2015, we had approximately $1,961,946,000 in Class A shares and Class T shares of common stock remaining in our Offering.

21

Table of Contents

Substantially all of our operations are conducted through Carter Validus Operating Partnership II, LP, or our Operating Partnership. We are externally advised by Carter Validus Advisors II, LLC, or our Advisor, pursuant to an advisory agreement between us and our Advisor, which is our affiliate. Our Advisor supervises and manages our day-to-day operations and selects the properties and real estate-related investments we acquire, subject to the oversight and approval of our board of directors. Our Advisor also provides marketing, sales and client services on our behalf. Our Advisor engages affiliated entities to provide various services to us. Our Advisor is managed by and is a subsidiary of our sponsor, Carter Validus REIT Management Company II, LLC. We have no paid employees.

As of September 30, 2015, we had purchased 17 real estate investments comprising approximately 1,208,000 of gross rental square feet for a purchase price of approximately $346,379,000.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our critical accounting policies were disclosed in our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies as disclosed therein.

Interim Unaudited Financial Data

Our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by us in accordance with GAAP in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the SEC. Certain information and footnote disclosures required for annual financial statements have been condensed or excluded pursuant to SEC rules and regulations. Accordingly, our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. Our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are, in our view, of a normal recurring nature and necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim period. Interim results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year; such full year results may be less favorable. Our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Qualification as a REIT

We qualified and elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2014. To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to currently distribute at least 90.0% of our REIT taxable income, without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gain, to our stockholders. As a REIT, we generally are not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that we distribute to our stockholders.

If we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT in any taxable year, we would then be subject to federal income taxes on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and would not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost unless the Internal Revenue Service grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could have a material adverse effect on our net income and net cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

For a discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements, see Note 2—“Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements” to our condensed consolidated financial statements that are a part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Segment Reporting

We report our financial performance based on two reporting segments—commercial real estate investments in data centers and healthcare. See Note 12—“Segment Reporting” to the condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information on our two reporting segments.

22

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Our results of operations are influenced by the timing of acquisitions and the operating performance of our real estate investments. The following table shows the property statistics of our real estate investments as of September 30, 2015 and 2014:

The following table summarizes our real estate investment activity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:

As shown in the tables above, we owned 17 commercial operating real estate investments as of September 30, 2015 compared to one commercial operating real estate investment as of September 30, 2014. Accordingly, our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 are not comparable; therefore, we have not included the percentage change.

We are not aware of any material trends or uncertainties, other than national economic conditions affecting real estate generally, that may be reasonably expected to have a material impact, favorable or unfavorable, on revenues or incomes from the acquisition, management and operation of properties other than those set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 and in Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2014

Revenue

For the three months ended September 30, 2015, revenue increased $6,819,000 to $6,884,000, as compared to $65,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2014. For the three months ended September 30, 2015, revenue was comprised of rental revenue of $6,230,000 and tenant reimbursement revenue of $654,000. For the three months ended September 30, 2014, revenue was comprised of rental revenue of $65,000. We did not generate tenant reimbursement revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in rental revenue and tenant reimbursement revenue was primarily due to owning 17 operating real estate investments with leases in-place as of September 30, 2015, as compared to owning one operating real estate investment with a lease in-place as of September 30, 2014.

Rental Expenses

Rental expenses increased $823,000 to $827,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to $4,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase was primarily due to owning 17 operating real estate investment with leases in-place as of September 30, 2015, as compared to owning one operating real estate investment with a lease in-place as of September 30, 2014, which resulted in increased real estate taxes of $317,000, increased property management fees of $172,000, increased repair and maintenance costs of $119,000, increased utility costs of $106,000, increased insurance costs of $52,000 and increased other rental expenses of $57,000 for such period.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased $259,000 to $439,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to $180,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase was primarily due to increased allocated personnel costs from our Advisor and allocated overhead costs associated with our growth, which resulted in increased personnel costs and professional fees of $185,000 and increased other administrative expenses of $74,000.

23

Table of Contents

Acquisition Related Expenses

Acquisition fees and expenses associated with transactions determined to be business combinations are expensed as incurred. Acquisition related expenses increased $3,491,000 to $3,760,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to $269,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase was primarily related to acquisition fees and expenses associated with the purchase of four real estate investments for an aggregate purchase price of $133,331,000 acquired during the three months ended September 30, 2015, which were determined to be business combinations. For the three months ended September 30, 2014, acquisition fees and expenses related to the acquisition of one real estate investment for an aggregate purchase price of $4,500,000.

Asset Management Fees

Asset management fees increased $633,000 to $639,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to $6,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in asset management fees was attributable to an increase in the weighted average real estate-related investments of $118,643,000 as of September 30, 2015, as compared to $747,000 as of September 30, 2014.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization increased $2,404,000 to $2,438,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to $34,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the weighted average depreciable basis of real estate properties to $121,774,000 as of September 30, 2015, as compared to $616,000 as of September 30, 2014.

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased $488,000 to $542,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to $54,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase was due to increased interest on our secured credit facility of $347,000 and increased amortization of debt issue costs of $167,000, offset by interest income earned on the money market bank accounts of $26,000. The increase in interest expense on our secured credit facility of $347,000 was due to an outstanding balance of $70,000,000 as of September 30, 2015. As of September 30, 2014, we had no debt outstanding under our secured credit facility.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014

Revenue

Revenue increased $12,196,000 to $12,261,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to approximately $65,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, revenue was comprised of rental revenue of $11,419,000 and tenant reimbursement revenue of $842,000. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, revenue was comprised of rental revenue of $65,000. We did not generate tenant reimbursement revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in rental revenue and tenant reimbursement revenue was primarily due to owning 17 operating real estate investments with leases in-place as of September 30, 2015, as compared to owning one operating real estate investment with a lease in-place as of September 30, 2014.

Rental Expenses

Rental expenses increased $1,145,000 to $1,149,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to $4,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The increase was primarily due to owning 17 operating real estate investment with leases in-place as of September 30, 2015, as compared to owning one operating real estate investment with a lease in-place as of September 30, 2014, which resulted in increased real estate taxes of $397,000, increased property management fees of $312,000, increased repair and maintenance costs of $137,000, increased utility costs of $108,000, increased insurance costs of $97,000, increased franchise and margin taxes of $43,000 and increased other rental expenses of $51,000.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased $1,167,000 to $1,366,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to $199,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The increase was primarily due to increased allocated personnel costs from our Advisor and allocated overhead costs associated with our growth, which resulted in increased personnel costs and professional fees of $864,000 and increased other administrative expenses of $303,000.

Acquisition Related Expenses

Acquisition fees and expenses associated with transactions determined to be business combinations are expensed as incurred. Acquisition related expenses increased $6,983,000 to $7,287,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to $304,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The increase was primarily related to acquisition fees and expenses associated with the purchase of 10 real estate investments for an aggregate purchase price of $249,404,000 acquired during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, which were determined to be business combinations. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, acquisition fees and expenses related to the acquisition of one real estate investment for an aggregate purchase price of $4,500,000.

24

Table of Contents

Asset Management Fees

Asset management fees increased $1,127,000 to $1,133,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to $6,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in asset management fees was attributable to an increase in the weighted average real estate-related investments of $118,643,000 as of September 30, 2015, as compared to $747,000 as of September 30, 2014.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization increased $4,014,000 to $4,048,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to $34,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the weighted average depreciable basis of real estate properties to $121,774,000 as of September 30, 2015, as compared to $616,000 as of September 30, 2014.

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased $1,149,000 to $1,203,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to $54,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The increase was due to increased interest on our secured credit facility of $733,000 and increased amortization of debt issue costs of $458,000, offset by interest income earned on the money market bank accounts of $42,000. The increase in interest expense on our secured credit facility of $733,000 was due to an outstanding balance of $70,000,000 as of September 30, 2015. As of September 30, 2014, we had no debt outstanding under our secured credit facility.

Organization and Offering Costs

We reimburse our Advisor or its affiliates for organization and offering costs it incurs on our behalf, but only to the extent the reimbursement would not cause the selling commissions, dealer manager fees, distribution fees and other organization and offering costs incurred by us to exceed 15% of gross offering proceeds as of the date of the reimbursement. We expect that other organization and offering costs (other than selling commissions, dealer manager fees and distribution fees) will be approximately 1.25% of the gross offering proceeds. Our Advisor and its affiliates incurred other organization and offering costs on our behalf of approximately $7,678,000 as of September 30, 2015. As of September 30, 2015, we reimbursed our Advisor or its affiliates approximately $7,247,000 in offering expenses and accrued approximately $431,000 of other organization and offering expenses, the total of which represents our maximum liability for other organization and offering costs as of September 30, 2015. As of September 30, 2015, we paid approximately $36,082,000 in selling commissions and dealer manager fees to SC Distributors, LLC, or our Dealer Manager. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, no Class T shares were sold and no distribution fees were paid. Other offering costs (other than selling commissions and dealer manager fees) were approximately $8,983,000 as of September 30, 2015.

When incurred, organization costs are expensed and offering costs, including selling commissions, dealer manager fees, distribution fees and other offering costs are charged to stockholders’ equity. For a further discussion of other organization and offering costs, see Note 9—“Related-Party Transactions and Arrangements” to the condensed consolidated financial statements that are a part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Inflation

We are exposed to inflation risk as income from long-term leases is the primary source of our cash flows from operations. There are provisions in certain of our tenant leases that are intended to protect us from, and mitigate the risk of, the impact of inflation. These provisions include reimbursement billings for operating expenses, pass-through charges and real estate tax and insurance reimbursements. However, due to the long-term nature of our leases, among other factors, the leases may not reset frequently enough to adequately offset the effects of inflation.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our sources of funds are primarily the net proceeds of our Offering, operating cash flows, our secured credit facility and other borrowings. Our principal demand for funds are for acquisitions of real estate and real estate-related investments, to pay operating expenses and interest on our future indebtedness and to pay distributions to our stockholders. In addition, we require resources to make certain payments to our Advisor and our Dealer Manager, which, during our Offering, include payments to our Advisor and its affiliates for reimbursement of other organization and offering expenses and other costs incurred on our behalf, and payments to our Dealer Manager and its affiliates for selling commissions, dealer manager fees, distribution fees, and offering expenses.

Generally, cash needs for items other than acquisitions of real estate and real estate-related investments are met from operations, borrowings, and the net proceeds of our Offering. However, there may be a delay between the sale of shares of our common stock and our investments in real estate and real estate-related investments, which could result in a delay in the benefits to our stockholders, if any, of returns generated from our investment operations.

25

Table of Contents

Our Advisor evaluates potential additional investments and engages in negotiations with real estate sellers, developers, brokers, investment managers, lenders and others on our behalf. Until we invest all of the proceeds of our Offering in properties and real estate-related investments, we may invest in short-term, highly liquid or other authorized investments. Such short-term investments will not earn significant returns, and we cannot predict how long it will take to fully invest the proceeds in properties and real estate-related investments. The number of properties we acquire and other investments we make will depend upon the number of shares sold in our Offering and the resulting amount of net proceeds available for investment.

When we acquire a property, our Advisor prepares a capital plan that contemplates the estimated capital needs of that investment. In addition to operating expenses, capital needs may also include costs of refurbishment, tenant improvements or other major capital expenditures. The capital plan also sets forth the anticipated sources of the necessary capital, which may include a line of credit or other loans established with respect to the investment, operating cash generated by the investment, additional equity investments from us or joint venture partners or, when necessary, capital reserves. Any capital reserves would be established from the gross proceeds of our Offering, proceeds from sales of other investments, operating cash generated by other investments or other cash on hand. In some cases, a lender may require us to establish capital reserves for a particular investment. The capital plan for each investment will be adjusted through ongoing, regular reviews of our portfolio or as necessary to respond to unanticipated additional capital needs.

Capital Expenditures

We estimate that we will require approximately $1.0 million in expenditures for capital improvements over the next 12 months. We cannot provide assurances, however, that actual expenditures will not exceed these estimated expenditure levels. As of September 30, 2015, we had $2.4 million of restricted cash in escrow reserve accounts for such capital expenditures.

Credit Facility

As of September 30, 2015, the total pool availability was $180,000,000 and the remaining aggregate pool availability was $110,000,000 under our secured credit facility. We believe we were in compliance with all financial covenant requirements as of September 30, 2015.

Cash Flows

Operating Activities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, net cash provided by operating activities was approximately $900,000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, net cash provided by operating activities primarily related to the operations of our property acquisitions, partially offset by operating expenses. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, net cash used in operating activities was approximately $242,000.

Investing Activities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, net cash used in investing activities was approximately $257,581,000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, net cash used in investing activities primarily related to the acquisition of 11 real estate investments in the amount of approximately $257,138,000, capital expenditures in the amount of approximately $640,000 and payments for real estate deposits of approximately $281,000, offset by receipts of escrow funds of $478,000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, net cash used in investing activities was approximately $4,450,000.

Financing Activities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, net cash provided by financing activities was approximately $303,342,000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, net cash provided by financing activities primarily related to proceeds from the issuance of common stock of approximately $311,955,000 and proceeds from our secured credit facility of approximately $72,000,000; offset by $39,500,000 in payments on our secured credit facility, $36,618,000 in offering costs related to the issuance of common stock, $3,759,000 in cash distributions to stockholders, $581,000 in payments of deferred financing costs and $155,000 in repurchases of our common stock. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, net cash provided by financing activities was approximately $16,060,000.

Distributions

The amount of distributions payable to our stockholders is determined by our board of directors and is dependent on a number of factors, including our funds available for distribution, financial condition, capital expenditure requirements and the annual distribution requirements needed to maintain our status as a REIT under the Code. Our board of directors may reduce the amount of distributions paid or suspend distribution payments at any time and, therefore, distribution payments are not guaranteed. Our Advisor may also defer, suspend and/or waive fees and expense reimbursements if we have not generated sufficient cash flow from our operations and other sources to fund distributions. Additionally, our organizational documents permit us to pay distributions from unlimited amounts of any source, and we may use sources other than operating cash flows to fund distributions, including proceeds from our Offering, which may reduce the amount of capital we ultimately invest in properties or other real estate-related investments.

26

Table of Contents

We have funded distributions with operating cash flows from our properties and proceeds raised in our Offering. To the extent that we do not have taxable income, distributions paid will be considered a return of capital to stockholders. The following table shows distributions paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (amounts in thousands):

Total distributions declared but not paid as of September 30, 2015 were approximately $1,982,000 for common stockholders. These distributions were paid on October 1, 2015.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we paid and declared distributions of approximately $9,554,000 to common stockholders, including shares issued pursuant to the DRIP, as compared to FFO (as defined below) for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 of approximately $123,000. The payment of distributions from sources other than FFO may reduce the amount of proceeds available for investment and operations or cause us to incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds.

For a discussion of distributions paid subsequent to September 30, 2015, see Note 15—“Subsequent Events” to the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Contractual Obligations

Our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2015 were as follows (amounts in thousands):

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of September 30, 2015, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Related-Party Transactions and Arrangements

We have entered into agreements with our Advisor and its affiliates whereby we agree to pay certain fees to, or reimburse certain expenses of, our Advisor or its affiliates for acquisition fees and expenses, organization and offering expenses, asset and property management fees and reimbursement of operating costs. Refer to Note 9—“Related-Party Transactions and Arrangements” to our condensed consolidated financial statements that are a part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a detailed discussion of the various related-party transactions and agreements.

Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations

One of our objectives is to provide cash distributions to our stockholders from cash generated by our operations. The purchase of real estate assets and real estate-related investments, and the corresponding expenses associated with that process, is a key operational feature of our business plan in order to generate cash from operations. Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, an industry trade group, has promulgated a measure known as funds from operations, or FFO, which we believe is an appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a REIT. The use of FFO is recommended by the REIT industry as a supplemental performance measure. FFO is not equivalent to our net income (loss) as determined under GAAP.

27

Table of Contents

We define FFO, consistent with NAREIT’s definition, as net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property and asset impairment write-downs, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnership and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will be calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis.

We, along with the others in the real estate industry, consider FFO to be an appropriate supplemental measure of a REIT’s operating performance because it is based on a net income (loss) analysis of property portfolio performance that excludes non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization and asset impairment write-downs, which we believe provides a more complete understanding of our performance to investors and to our management, and when compared year over year, reflects the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy.

Historical accounting convention (in accordance with GAAP) for real estate assets requires companies to report its investment in real estate at its carrying value, which consists of capitalizing the cost of acquisitions, development, construction, improvements and significant replacements, less depreciation and amortization and asset impairment write-downs, if any, which is not necessarily equivalent to the fair market value of its investment in real estate assets.

The historical accounting convention requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and improvements, which implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, which could be the case if such assets are not adequately maintained or repaired and renovated as required by relevant circumstances and/or as requested or required by lessees for operational purposes in order to maintain the value disclosed. We believe that, since fair value of real estate assets historically rises and falls with market conditions including, but not limited to, inflation, interest rates, the business cycle, unemployment and consumer spending, presentations of operating results for a REIT using historical accounting for depreciation could be less informative.

In addition, we believe it is appropriate to disregard asset impairment write-downs as it is a non-cash adjustment to recognize losses on prospective sales of real estate assets. Since losses from sales of real estate assets are excluded from FFO, we believe it is appropriate that asset impairment write-downs in advancement of realization of losses should be excluded. Impairment write-downs are based on negative market fluctuations and underlying assessments of general market conditions, which are independent of our operating performance, including, but not limited to, a significant adverse change in the financial condition of our tenants, changes in supply and demand for similar or competing properties, changes in tax, real estate, environmental and zoning law, which can change over time. When indicators of potential impairment suggest that the carrying value of real estate and related assets may not be recoverable, we assess the recoverability by estimating whether we will recover the carrying value of the asset through undiscounted future cash flows and eventual disposition (including, but not limited to, net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of property and any other ancillary cash flows at a property or group level under GAAP). If based on this analysis, we do not believe that we will be able to recover the carrying value of the real estate asset, we will record an impairment write-down to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the real estate asset. Testing for indicators of impairment is a continuous process and is analyzed on a quarterly basis. Investors should note, however, that determinations of whether impairment charges have been incurred are based partly on anticipated operating performance, because estimated undiscounted future cash flows from a property, including estimated future net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and certain other ancillary cash flows, are taken into account in determining whether an impairment charge has been incurred. While impairment charges are excluded from the calculation of FFO as described above, investors are cautioned that due to the fact that impairments are based on estimated future undiscounted cash flows and that we intend to have a relatively limited term of our operations, it could be difficult to recover any impairment charges through the eventual sale of the property. No impairment losses have been recorded to date.

In developing estimates of expected future cash flow, we make certain assumptions regarding future market rental income amounts subsequent to the expiration of current lease arrangements, property operating expenses, terminal capitalization and discount rates, the expected number of months it takes to re-lease the property, required tenant improvements and the number of years the property will be held for investment. The use of alternative assumptions in the future cash flow analysis could result in a different determination of the property’s future cash flows and a different conclusion regarding the existence of an asset impairment, the extent of such loss, if any, as well as the carrying value of the real estate asset.

Publicly registered, non-listed REITs, such as ours, typically have a significant amount of acquisition activity and are substantially more dynamic during their initial years of investment and operations. While other start up entities may also experience significant acquisition activity during their initial years, we believe that publicly registered, non-listed REITs are unique in that they have a limited life with targeted exit strategies within a relatively limited time frame after the acquisition activity ceases. We will use the proceeds raised in our offering to acquire real estate assets and real estate-related investments, and we intend to begin the process of achieving a liquidity event (i.e., listing of our shares of common stock on a national securities exchange, a merger or sale, the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or another similar transaction) within five

28

Table of Contents

years after the completion of our offering stage, which is generally comparable to other publicly registered, non-listed REITs. Thus, we do not intend to continuously purchase real estate assets and intend to have a limited life. Due to these factors and other unique features of publicly registered, non-listed REITS, the Investment Program Association, or the IPA, an industry trade group, has standardized a measure known as modified funds from operations, or MFFO, which we believe to be another appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a publicly registered, non-listed REIT. MFFO is a metric used by management to evaluate sustainable performance and dividend policy. MFFO is not equivalent to our net income (loss) as determined under GAAP.

We define MFFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the IPA’s definition: FFO further adjusted for the following items included in the determination of GAAP net income (loss); acquisition fees and expenses; amounts related to straight-line rental income and amortization of above and below intangible lease assets and liabilities; accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments; mark-to-market adjustments included in net income; nonrecurring gains or losses included in net income from the extinguishment or sale of debt, hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings where trading of such holdings is not a fundamental attribute of the business plan, unrealized gains or losses resulting from consolidation from, or deconsolidation to, equity accounting, adjustments related to contingent purchase price obligations where such adjustments have been included in the derivation of GAAP net income, and after adjustments for a consolidated and unconsolidated partnership and joint ventures, with such adjustments calculated to reflect MFFO on the same basis. Our MFFO calculation complies with the IPA’s Practice Guideline, described above. In calculating MFFO, we exclude paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses that are reported in our condensed consolidated statement of operations, amortization of above and below-market leases, amounts related to straight-line rents (which are adjusted in order to reflect such payments from a GAAP accrual basis to closer to an expected to be received cash basis of disclosing the rent and lease payments); and the adjustments of such items related to noncontrolling interests in our Operating Partnership. The other adjustments included in the IPA’s guidelines are not applicable to us.

Since MFFO excludes acquisition fees and expenses, it should not be construed as a historic performance measure. Acquisition fees and expenses are paid in cash by us, and we have not set aside or put into escrow any specific amount of proceeds from our offerings to be used to fund acquisition fees and expenses. Acquisition fees and expenses include payments to our Advisor or its affiliates and third parties. Such fees and expenses will not be reimbursed by our Advisor or its affiliates and third parties, and therefore if there are no further proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock to fund future acquisition fees and expenses, such fees and expenses will need to be paid from either additional debt, operational earnings or cash flows, net proceeds from the sale of properties, or from ancillary cash flows. As a result, the amount of proceeds available for investment and operations would be reduced, or we may incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds. Nevertheless, our Advisor or its affiliates will not accrue any claim on our assets if acquisition fees and expenses are not paid from the proceeds of our offerings. Under GAAP, acquisition fees and expenses related to the acquisition of properties determined to be business combinations are expensed as incurred, including investment transactions that are no longer under consideration, and are included in acquisition related expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations and acquisition fees and expenses associated with transactions determined to be an asset purchase are capitalized.

All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by us, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of other properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the real estate asset, these fees and expenses and other costs related to such property. In addition, MFFO may not be an indicator of our operating performance, especially during periods in which properties are being acquired.

In addition, certain contemplated non-cash fair value and other non-cash adjustments are considered operating non-cash adjustments to net income (loss) in determining cash flows from operations in accordance with GAAP.

We use MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it in order to evaluate our performance against other publicly registered, non-listed REITs, which intend to have limited lives with short and defined acquisition periods and targeted exit strategies shortly thereafter. As noted above, MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance if we do not continue to operate in this manner. We believe that our use of MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it allow us to present our performance in a manner that reflects certain characteristics that are unique to publicly registered, non-listed REITs, such as their limited life, limited and defined acquisition period and targeted exit strategy, and hence the use of such measures may be useful to investors. For example, acquisition fees and expenses are intended to be funded from the proceeds of our offering and other financing sources and not from operations. By excluding acquisition fees and expenses, the use of MFFO provides information consistent with management’s analysis of the operating performance of its real estate assets. Additionally, fair value adjustments, which are based on the impact of current market fluctuations and underlying assessments of general market conditions, but can also result from operational factors such as rental and occupancy rates, may not be directly related or attributable to our current operating performance. By excluding such charges that may reflect anticipated and unrealized gains or losses, we believe MFFO provides useful supplemental information.

29

Table of Contents

Presentation of this information is intended to assist management and investors in comparing the operating performance of different REITs, although it should be noted that not all REITs calculate FFO and MFFO the same way, so comparisons with other REITs may not be meaningful. Furthermore, FFO and MFFO are not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) as an indication of our performance, as an indication of our liquidity, or indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. FFO and MFFO should be reviewed in conjunction with other measurements as an indication of our performance. MFFO has limitations as a performance measure in an offering such as ours where the price of a share of common stock is stated value and there is no asset value determination during the offering stage for a period thereafter. MFFO may be useful in assisting management and investors in assessing the sustainability of operating performance in future operating periods, and in particular, after the offering and acquisition stages are complete and net asset value is disclosed. MFFO is not a useful measure in evaluating net asset value since impairment write-downs are taken into account in determining net asset value but not in determining MFFO.

FFO and MFFO, as described above, should not be construed to be more relevant or accurate than the current GAAP methodology in calculating net income (loss) or in its applicability in evaluating our operational performance. The method used to evaluate the value and performance of real estate under GAAP should be construed as a more relevant measure of operation performance and considered more prominently than the non-GAAP FFO and measures and the adjustments to GAAP in calculating FFO and MFFO. MFFO has not been scrutinized to the level of other similar non-GAAP performance measures by the SEC or any other regulatory body.

The following is a reconciliation of net income/(loss) attributable to controlling interests, which is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, to FFO and MFFO for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (amounts in thousands, except share data and per share amounts):

30

Table of Contents

31

Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive instruments. In pursuing our business plan, the primary market risk to which we are exposed is interest rate changes, primarily as a result of long-term debt used to acquire properties and make loans and other permitted investments. We intend to manage our interest rate risk by limiting the impact of interest rate changes on earnings, prepayment penalties and cash flows, and by lowering overall borrowing costs while taking into account variable interest rate risk. To achieve our objectives, we may borrow at fixed or variable rates. We may also enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and caps in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on a related financial instrument. We will not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes.

In addition to changes in interest rates, the value of our future investments will be subject to fluctuations based on changes in local and regional economic conditions and changes in the creditworthiness of tenants, which may affect our ability to refinance our debt if necessary.

As of September 30, 2015, we had $70.0 million of variable rate debt outstanding related to the secured credit facility. As of September 30, 2015, the interest rate on such debt was 1.97%. As of September 30, 2015, an increase of 50 basis points in the market rates of interest would have resulted in a change in interest expense of $0.4 million per year.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to us, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, as ours are designed to do, and we necessarily were required to apply our judgment in evaluating whether the benefits of the controls and procedures that we adopt outweigh their costs.

As required by Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, an evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as of September 30, 2015, were effective, in all material respects, for the purposes stated above.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended September 30, 2015, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

32

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

We are not aware of any material pending legal proceedings to which we are a party or to which our properties are the subject.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes from the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the SEC on March 26, 2015, except as noted below.

Distributions paid from sources other than our cash flow from operations will result in us having fewer funds available for the acquisition of properties and other real estate-related investments, which may adversely affect our ability to fund future distributions with cash flow from operations and may adversely affect your overall return.

We have paid, and may continue to pay, distributions from sources other than from our cash flows from operations. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, our cash flows provided by operations of approximately $900,000 was a shortfall of approximately $8,654,000, or (90.6%), of our distributions paid (total distributions were approximately $9,554,000, of which $3,759,000 was cash and $5,795,000 was reinvested in shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRIP) during such period. For the year ended December 31, 2014, our cash flows used in operations of approximately $1,705,000 was a shortfall of approximately $2,135,000, or (497%), of our distributions paid (total distributions were approximately $430,000, of which $160,000 was cash and $270,000 was reinvested in shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRIP) during such period and such shortfall was paid from proceeds from our Offering. Additionally, we may in the future pay distributions from sources other than from our cash flows from operations. Until we acquire additional properties or other real estate-related investments, we may not generate sufficient cash flows from operations to pay distributions. Our inability to acquire additional properties or other real estate-related investments may result in a lower return on your investment than you expect.

We do not have any limits on the sources of funding distribution payments to our stockholders. We may pay, and have no limits on the amounts we may pay, distributions from any source, such as from borrowings, the sale of assets, the sale of additional securities, advances from our advisor, our advisor’s deferral, suspension and/or waiver of its fees and expense reimbursements and Offering proceeds. Funding distributions from borrowings could restrict the amount we can borrow for investments, which may affect our profitability. Funding distributions with the sale of assets may affect our ability to generate cash flows. Funding distributions from the sale of additional securities could dilute your interest in us if we sell shares of our common stock to third party investors. If we fund distributions from the proceeds of our Offering, we will have less funds available for acquiring properties or real estate-related investments. Our inability to acquire additional properties or real estate-related investments may have a negative effect on our investors’ ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to pay distributions. As a result, the return investors may realize on their investment may be reduced and investors who invest in us before we generate significant cash flow may realize a lower rate of return than later investors. Payment of distributions from any of the mentioned sources could restrict our ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations, affect our profitability and/or affect the distributions payable upon a liquidity event, any or all of which may have an adverse effect on an investment in us.

A high concentration of our properties in a particular geographic area, or with tenants in a similar industry, would magnify the effects of downturns in that geographic area or industry.

As of September 30, 2015, the Company owned real estate investments in 13 metropolitan statistical areas, or MSAs, four of which accounted for 10.0% or more of rental revenue. Real estate investments located in the Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, Texas MSA, the Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, Texas MSA, the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, Massachusetts-New Hampshire MSA and the Kansas City, Missouri-Kansas MSA accounted for 26.1%, 17.3%, 15.2% and 12.2%, respectively, of rental revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. In the event that we have a concentration of properties in any particular geographic area, any adverse situation that disproportionately effects that geographic area would have a magnified adverse effect on our portfolio. Similarly, if tenants of our properties become concentrated in a certain industry or industries, any adverse effect to that industry generally would have a disproportionately adverse effect on our portfolio.

If we were considered to actually or constructively pay a “preferential dividend” to certain of our stockholders, our status as a REIT could be adversely affected.

As stated above, in order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must distribute as dividends to our stockholders at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends-paid deduction and excluding net capital gains. In order for distributions to be counted as satisfying the annual distribution requirements for REITs, and to provide us with a REIT-level tax deduction, the distributions must not be “preferential dividends.” A dividend is not a preferential dividend if the distribution is pro rata among all outstanding shares of stock within a particular class and in

33

Table of Contents

accordance with the preferences among different classes of stock as set forth in our organizational documents. If the IRS were to take the position that we paid a preferential dividend, we may be deemed to have failed the 90% distribution test, and our status as a REIT could be terminated for the year in which such determination is made if we were unable to cure such failure. Even if we remain qualified as a REIT, we may have to change the way our fees and expenses are incurred and allocated to different classes of stockholders. We may request a private letter ruling from the IRS concluding that differences in the dividends distributed to holders of Class A shares and holders of Class T shares do not result in the payment of a preferential dividend. There is no assurance that we will request such a ruling, or if we do, that the IRS will issue such a ruling.

The Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts has charged an affiliate of our dealer manager with fraudulent casting of shareholder proxy votes and is seeking to suspend that entity’s broker-dealer registration in Massachusetts. Suspension of our offering by participating broker-dealers due to the affiliated relationship could adversely affect our ability to raise proceeds in the Offering, and could adversely affect our ability to obtain additional debt financing. 

On November 12, 2015, the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts charged an affiliate of our dealer manager with fraudulent casting of shareholder proxy votes. While the complaint does not relate to us, our unaffiliated dealer manager or the Offering, the complaint does seek to revoke the broker-dealer registration in Massachusetts of our dealer manager’s affiliate. If participating broker-dealers determine to suspend, rescind or refuse to execute soliciting dealer agreements with our dealer manager as a result of this complaint, we may not be able to raise a substantial amount of additional capital in the Offering. If we are not able to raise a substantial amount of additional capital, including in our Offering and our credit facility, we may have difficulty in identifying and investing in properties or other assets that satisfy our investment objectives. This could also adversely affect our ability to pay regular distributions to stockholders.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

On July 17, 2015, we granted an aggregate of 9,000 shares of common stock under our 2014 Restricted Share Plan to our independent directors in connection with such independent directors’ re-election to our board of directors. The shares were not registered under the Securities Act and were issued in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. There were no other sales of unregistered securities for the three months ended September 30, 2015.

Share Repurchase Program

Our share repurchase program permits stockholders to sell their shares back to us after they have held them for at least one year, subject to certain conditions and limitations. We will limit the number of shares repurchased during any calendar year to 5.0% of the number of shares of our common stock outstanding on December 31 of the previous calendar year. In addition, the share repurchase program provides that all redemptions during any calendar year, including those upon death or a qualifying disability of a stockholder, are limited to those that can be funded with proceeds raised from the DRIP Offering during the prior calendar year and other operating funds, if any, as the board of directors, in its sole discretion, may reserve for this purpose. Our board of directors has the right, in its sole discretion, to waive such holding requirement in the event of the death or qualifying disability of a stockholder, other involuntary exigent circumstances, such as bankruptcy, or a mandatory requirement under a stockholder’s IRA.

During the three months ended September 30, 2015, we fulfilled the following repurchase requests pursuant to our share repurchase program: