Simply, Inc. - Annual Report: 2012 (Form 10-K)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark one)

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012

or

For the transition period from                  to                

Commission File No. 001-32217

InfoSonics Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

3636 Nobel Drive, Suite 325

San Diego, CA 92122

(Address of principal executive offices including zip code)

858-373-1600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    ¨  Yes    x  No

Indicated by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.    ¨  Yes    x  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  Yes    x  No

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was $15,559,668. This calculation is based upon the closing price of $1.56 of the stock on June 29, 2012. Without asserting that any director or executive officer of the registrant, or the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the registrant’s common stock, is an affiliate, the shares of which they are the beneficial owners have been deemed to be owned by affiliates solely for this calculation.

As of March 22, 2013, there were 14,184,146 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The information called for by Part III is incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement for the Company’s 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders expected to be held on June 10, 2013.

Table of Contents

InfoSonics Corporation

Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2012

INDEX

Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements in this annual report on Form 10-K constitute “forward-looking statements.” These forward-looking statements involve known or unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may or may not be outside our control and that may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Specifically, the actions of competitors, suppliers and customers are generally outside of our control. Our ability to execute our business plans and to increase revenues and operating income are each dependent upon our ability to continue to expand our current businesses and to enter new business areas, as well as upon general economic conditions and other factors, including some of the factors identified as “Risk Factors” in this annual report and from time to time in our other SEC filings. You can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continues,” or the negative of these terms, or other comparable terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. We do not intend to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, unless required by law.

In this annual report on Form 10-K, “InfoSonics,” “InfoSonics Corporation,” “the Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to InfoSonics Corporation and our wholly owned subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, unless the context otherwise provides.

PART I

Company Overview

We are a provider of wireless handsets (which may be referred to herein as “phones”, “cell phones”, “mobile phones”, “feature phones” and “smartphones”) and accessories to carriers, distributors and original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) in Latin America, Asia Pacific, Europe and Africa. We design, develop, source and sell our proprietary line of products under the verykool^® brand and on a private label basis to certain customers (collectively referred to as verykool^® products). We first introduced our verykool^® brand in 2006 with the goal to provide the market with products that are unique, beautifully designed, feature packed and provide exceptional “value” for the consumer. Our verykool^® products include entry-level, mid-tier and high-end feature phones and Android-based smartphones.

Our corporate headquarters are in San Diego, California. We have wholly owned subsidiaries in Central and South America, which conduct some of our business activities in their respective regions, as well as subsidiaries in Hong Kong and China where we conduct research and development of our verykool^® products, oversee production at contract manufacturers, conduct quality control and monitor third party logistics and warehousing for shipment to our customers. We also have sales representatives, field engineers and marketing resources located throughout Latin America, our principal market.

For the past five years, our business has had two primary components: (1) legacy distribution of wireless handsets supplied by major manufacturers, primarily Samsung, and (2) provision of our own proprietary verykool^® products that we originally sourced from independent design houses and original design manufacturers (“ODMs”). Our revenue peaked in 2006 when we recorded approximately $241 million of net sales. In 2009, more than 95% of our net sales of approximately $231 million were derived from distribution sales of Samsung product to carriers in Argentina. In late 2009, however, a stiff import tariff on certain electronic devices, including wireless handsets, was enacted in Argentina. The tariff had a significant negative impact on our sales beginning in the first quarter of 2010, and ultimately resulted in a decrease of 69% of our sales volume in 2010

1

Table of Contents

compared to 2009. Then, in February 2011, Argentina enacted a further import regulation effective March 6, 2011 which signaled the closing stage of our distribution business. Our distribution agreement with Samsung was scheduled to expire December 31, 2011 but was extended until March 31, 2012 to accommodate the orderly conclusion of this business. Since April 1, 2012 , our business has and will continue to be centered on our verykool^® product line.

Our flagship product line is now verykool^®. In order to better control our product roadmap, in April 2010 we established an in-house design center in Beijing, China where we design a number of phones in our product portfolio. We continue to source the remainder of our phones from independent design houses and ODMs. We contract with electronic manufacturing services (“EMS”) providers to manufacture all of our branded products.

We incorporated under the laws of the State of California on February 7, 1994, under the name InfoSonics Corporation. On September 11, 2003, we reincorporated under the same name under the laws of and into the State of Maryland.

Global Wireless Industry

Today’s wireless handsets can be segmented into two primary categories: feature phones and smartphones. The distinguishing characteristics of smartphones is that they are built on a mobile operating system and are generally more sophisticated, have higher computing power and are more expensive. Rapid technological developments over recent years within the wireless telecommunications industry have allowed wireless subscribers to talk, send and receive text messages, send and receive e-mails, capture and transmit digital images, send and receive multimedia messages, play games, listen to music, watch visual content and browse the Internet using all-in-one wireless handsets. Wireless handsets, accessories and services also are being used around the world to provide remote monitoring, point-of-sale transaction processing, inter-device communications, local area networks, location monitoring, sales force automation, and customer relationship management. While current demand for some of these more advanced services and features is not as strong in certain of the price-sensitive foreign markets we serve, the cost of producing smartphones continues to decline and we believe demand will increase in the future as the products become more affordable and worldwide economic conditions improve.

The following statistics were published by GSMA Wireless Intelligence. Worldwide wireless connections at December 31, 2012 reached an estimated 6.8 billion, or approximately 97% of the world’s population. However, this number decreases to an estimated 5.9 billion when machine-to-machine connections and inactive SIM cards are excluded. Furthermore, it is estimated that consumers use an average of 1.85 SIM cards each so that the number of “unique” mobile subscribers at the end of 2012 was estimated to be 3.2 billion. This indicates that only an estimated 46% of the world’s population has subscribed to mobile services. Approximately one-third of the world’s 7 billion population are unlikely to be able to subscribe to mobile services for a variety of reasons including an absence of network coverage, but GSMA Wireless Intelligence predicts that the mobile industry will reach the 5 billion unique user milestone over the next decade as network expansion continues to progress in developing markets and as people in rural areas subscribe to mobile services. By 2017, subscriber penetration in “developed” countries is expected to pass 80%, and growth in these markets is expected to slow. In contrast, subscriber penetration across “developing” countries is forecast to increase from 39% in 2012 to 47% in 2017. The highest unique subscriber penetration is in Japan (88%) and Europe (87% in the UK). However, penetration is only 26% in India, 33% in Africa and 57% in South America. In China, the world’s largest mobile market, unique subscriber penetration is expected to grow from 43% to 52% over the next five years.

According to Strategy Analytics, shipments of mobile phones during 2012 increased by less than 2% to an estimated 1.575 billion devices compared to 1.546 billion units in 2011. However, according to the firm IDC, shipments of smartphones in 2012 grew by 43% over the prior year to more than 700 million units. This represents approximately 44% of all mobile phone shipments for the year. The replacement cycle and the popularity and affordability of smartphones remain the largest factors driving global mobile phone sales demand.

2

Table of Contents

The rapid shift from feature phones to smartphones is evidenced in the Q4-2012 shipment numbers published by IDC. Worldwide smartphone shipments in Q4-2012 amounted to over 219 million units, a 36% increase over Q4-2011, and 45% of all mobile phone shipments in the quarter. The Android operating system became the undisputed worldwide volume leader in smartphones in 2012, growing from a 49% market share in 2011 to 68% market share in 2012. However, 2013 is expected to be a year when Android will be required to defend its leadership position not only against Apple, but also against a building wave of challengers including Microsoft, Blackberry, Firefox, Ubuntu and Tizen.

In 2013, IDC expects 5.5% growth over 2012 in worldwide mobile phone shipments. This includes an expected 22% increase in smartphone shipments, much slower than the 43% growth in 2012. 2013 unit shipments of feature phones are expected to decline globally by 6%, a slower rate of decline compared to the 15% decline experienced in 2012.

Our Business and Strategy

China is the world leader in both manufacturing and design of wireless handsets. Furthermore, on the manufacturing front, Chinese suppliers have forced most other competitors out of the worldwide market with their substantial cost advantage. With a desire to improve our time-to-market, better protect our technology and know-how and improve our cost structure, in late 2009 we began to search for an experienced management team to serve as the core for an in-house design team based in Beijing. In April 2010 we recruited a team of experienced management and technical personnel who now serve as both our design house for all our markets and as the base for marketing and selling our products in Asia-Pacific. At December 31, 2012, this team consisted of 55 employees, primarily engineers located in Beijing, and quality control and manufacturing support personnel in Shenzhen. The quarter ended June 30, 2010 was the first full quarter of operation of our China subsidiary. Its expenses are classified as R&D expenses on our statement of operations, together with any NRE (non-recurring engineering) expenses paid to other design houses. We shipped our first product designed by our China team to a customer in China in October 2010. We expect to continue to use outside design houses to augment the efforts of our China development team. All of our manufacturing is done by contract manufacturers in China.

Our current strategy is to source most of our low-end feature phones from outside design houses and have our in-house development team focus on more complicated models and smartphones. Many of our internally developed models are ruggedized, active lifestyle phones that are the basis for a concept we believe has significant market potential. We believe the attractive industrial design or “feel” of these phones gives them strong appeal, and, when combined with a rather unique combination of features, help differentiate these products from the competition. With the cessation of our historical distribution business, we are striving to expand sales of our proprietary verykool^® phones. Our strategy includes the following elements:

Differentiated verykool^® Product Line.

The worldwide market for wireless handsets is extremely competitive. It is characterized by a large number of providers, often with very similar products, who often ultimately compete on price at very thin margins. The capabilities and features of the phones are primarily a function of the chipset manufacturers, and it is difficult to

3

Table of Contents

achieve differentiation. Despite this, we still believe differentiation is possible, particularly through our line of verykool^® active lifestyle handsets that we are in the process of expanding. We strive for (1) a consistent, attractive industrial design, (2) a unique combination of features, and (3) an attractive price point which together provide exceptional “value” to the consumer and which we hope will set our phones apart from the competition.

Smartphones vs. Feature Phones.

Technological advances and affordability in smartphones, including the pervasiveness of the open source Android operating system, are driving the global wireless industry. The popularity of smartphones is gaining dramatically in developed countries with broader-based consumer purchasing power. However, in certain geographic regions including Latin America, the market is extremely price sensitive and the price points of traditional smartphones are beyond the reach of most consumers. With increasing volumes and lower production costs for smartphones, we intend to expand our portfolio of affordable smartphones. We will also continue to provide low-end feature phones, but expect over time to replace more expensive feature phones with entry-level smartphones.

Geographic Market Expansion.

Historically, our traditional market focus has been Latin America. However, as described above, with the opening of our new development subsidiary in Beijing in April 2010, we expanded geographically into Asia Pacific by offering our products to OEM customers on a private label basis. In the fourth quarter of 2010 we shipped our first products to customers in both China and India, and in 2011 added private label customers in Western Europe, Russia, Singapore, other Southeast Asian countries and Africa. During 2012, our private label business was concentrated in the first quarter, and in 2013 we intend to explore the introduction of the verykool^® brand into certain of these markets where we have previously only sold our products on a private label basis. In addition, during 2012 we began selling verykool^® products to a small number of distributors in the United States who serve small Regional Service Area (“RSA”) carriers. We expect to continue this effort in 2013, along with offering our phones to consumers in the U.S. through our on-line store.

Leverage our Latin America Presence.

We have worked hard over the past five years to develop the verykool^® brand name in Latin America. As we differentiate our product line as described above, we intend to leverage the brand equity we have built in Latin America, as well as our existing in-country sales and technical resources, to expand sales to existing customers, acquire new customers, and expand into other Latin America countries where possible.

Design Partnerships.

The pace of technological advancement in the wireless industry continues to accelerate. We are confident in the capabilities of our design team, but recognize that our resources are limited in comparison to some of our competitors. We have used technology partnerships in the past, and intend to seek them out in the future, to leverage our core team and expand our capabilities. This is expected to help us expand our product portfolio and enable us to participate in new technologies.

Customers

Our current Latin American customers include carriers, agents, distributors and resellers. Our customers elsewhere in Asia Pacific, Europe and Africa are all OEM customers to whom our products are sold on a private label basis and comprised 15% of our verykool^® product sales in 2012. We sell our products pursuant to customer purchase orders and ship products by common carrier based on customer-specified delivery dates. During 2012, we sold products to approximately 22 customers. Our three largest customers in 2012 represented 16%, 11% and 9% of our net sales, respectively. Our largest customer was an open market distributor, the second largest was a carrier customer in Latin America and the third largest was an OEM customer in Europe.

4

Table of Contents

Purchasing and Suppliers

Over the past three years, Samsung was the major supplier for our distribution business, primarily in Argentina. Products purchased from Samsung related entities represented 9%, 41% and 45% of our cost of sales in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decline in concentration of Samsung purchases in 2012 is due to the termination on March 31, 2012 of our distribution business.

For our branded verykool^® products, we have established key relationships with a number of leading contract manufacturers of wireless telecommunications equipment. Certain of these manufacturers are ODMs who design and manufacture wireless handsets to our specifications or based upon their own criteria. Others are contract manufacturers who we use to produce wireless handsets to our specifications as designed and prototyped by our in-house design team. In 2012, we purchased products from nine manufacturers, the top three representing 24%, 24% and 21% of our cost of sales, respectively.

We maintain agreements with certain of our significant suppliers. Certain of the agreements require us to satisfy minimum monthly volumes to secure specified pricing. The supply agreements generally can be terminated on short notice by either party. We purchase products from manufacturers pursuant to purchase orders placed from time to time in the ordinary course of business. Purchase orders are typically filled, based on manufacturing lead times, and shipped to our designated warehouses by common freight carriers. We believe that our relationships with our suppliers are generally good. Any failure or delay by our suppliers in supplying us with products on favorable terms and at competitive prices may severely diminish our ability to obtain and deliver products to our customers on a timely and competitive basis. Although there are a number of such suppliers available to provide or manufacture our products, the establishment of these relationships typically requires a significant investment of time by both parties, and a change in suppliers could cause a delay in or loss of sales and adversely affect our results.

Sales and Marketing

We believe that direct selling and one-on-one relationships, as well as in-depth product and competitive landscape knowledge, are important factors in the marketing of the products we sell. Accordingly, in our business-to-business environment, we promote relationship building and maintenance through personal customer contact by our in-country sales and marketing professionals. Additionally, in order to promote our verykool^® brand, we advertise in certain of the geographies where we do business in industry publications, both print and online, on billboards and by attending industry trade shows. Further, we may participate in co-op advertising sponsored by our carrier customers in radio and newspaper ads.

As of December 31, 2012, we employed or contracted with 20 sales, marketing and merchandizing professionals who are assigned specific geographic territories, most of whom reside in-country. Each salesperson is generally compensated with a base salary or retainer plus a commission or bonus based on sales in his or her territory.

Research and Development

In April 2010 we formed an in-house development team consisting primarily of seasoned wireless engineers in Beijing, China. Our product roadmap is determined and monitored by close coordination between our Beijing team and corporate product management. The first verykool^® product designed by our China team was shipped in the fourth quarter of 2010 and we have generated a relatively continuous flow of new products since that time. During the second half of 2012, the R&D team had a large number of new products under development simultaneously, and, as a consequence, the headcount was expanded to match the workload. At December 31, 2012, the team had 55 employees. However, in late December, as the multiple development projects were drawing to completion, we determined to execute a restructuring of our China workforce in the first quarter of 2013 to eliminate redundancies and to shift more of our personnel to Shenzhen from Beijing to be closer to our suppliers, contract manufacturers and customers. The restructuring included the reduction of 21 employees. We

5

Table of Contents

expect to continue to use outside design houses to augment the efforts of our China development team and will sometimes incur outside non-recurring engineering fees, which are also classified as R&D expense. R&D expenses for the year ended December 31, 2012 amounted to $2.2 million.

Financial and Other Information about Our Business

Other information, including financial, customer, competitive and geographic information, as well as a further discussion of the impact of the Argentina tariff, is incorporated by reference herein from Items 1A and 7 hereof and Note 12 to our Consolidated Audited Financial Statements.

Seasonality

Our operations may be influenced by a number of seasonal factors in the countries and markets in which we operate. Our business historically has experienced increased sales during the fourth quarter of the calendar year due to the Christmas holiday season. On the supply side of our business, because all manufacturing of our branded verykool^® phones is done in China, the first quarter of the calendar year can be a difficult time during closure of factories for the Chinese New Year. We strive to manage around the closure, but if factories have difficulty starting back up, we could experience delays in getting product and satisfying customer orders, which could have a material adverse effect on our results.

Competition

The industry and markets where we operate are highly competitive and such competition may increase in the future. Wireless handsets are subject to price competition and price erosion over the lives of the products. We compete on a number of factors, including product design and features, product pricing, level of services offered, market and product knowledge, customer service, product availability and overall value provided to our customers. Our competitors often possess substantially greater financial, technological, marketing, personnel and other resources than we do, which could enable them to withstand substantial price competition, launch new products and implement extensive advertising and promotional campaigns. Historically, the barriers to entry into the sourcing and distribution of wireless handsets have been relatively low. Our ability to continue to compete successfully in the wireless handset business is largely dependent on our ability to anticipate and respond to various competitive and other factors affecting the industry, including new or changing outsourcing requirements, new technology requirements, new and differentiated product introductions, inconsistent or inadequate supply of product, changes in consumer preferences, demographic trends, regional and local economic conditions, and discount pricing strategies and promotional activities by competitors.

We compete for sales of wireless handsets and accessories with well-established carriers, distributors and in some cases our current contract manufacturers. Manufacturers, including our own suppliers, sell their products directly to some large carriers, and as these carriers grow in size, they may pose more of a competitive threat to our business by bypassing our distribution system in favor of doing business directly with manufacturers. Our competitors in Latin America include wireless OEMs, wireless equipment manufacturers, carriers and wireless distributors such as BrightPoint, Inc., Brightstar Corporation and CT Miami. Our competition in Asia Pacific is very fragmented and includes a large number of Asia-based ODMs.

Information Systems

Our information systems are comprised of a standard licensed accounting and general ledger software system plus a licensed data base program that has been customized to meet our specific needs. The data base system allows management to exercise real-time control over many elements of our business including customer relationship management, purchasing, inventory management and control, sales order control and pricing management. It also provides management with many reports and statistical analysis relating to products, customers and suppliers. Although we believe our information systems are adequate, the two systems are discreet

6

Table of Contents

and do not interface with each other. As a result, there is a significant amount of duplicate data entry required to record all transactions in the accounting system. We have licensed a more complete and integrated enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system which we plan to implement in 2013.

Employees

As of December 31, 2012, we had 103 employees and contractors. Of these employees and contractors, 2 were in executive management positions, 20 were engaged in sales and marketing, 55 were in research and development, 3 were in service operations, 4 were in finance and administration, and 19 were in product development, logistics and field engineering. We plan to reduce the size of our research and development staff by 21 as part of a restructuring in the first quarter of 2013. From time to time, we utilize temporary employees to perform warehouse functions. Our employees and contractors are not covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We believe that our relations with our employees and contractors are good.

Available Information

Our website at www.infosonics.com provides a link to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website where our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports (as well as exhibits and supplementary schedules) filed with or furnished to the SEC can be accessed free of charge. Our website also provides links to the charters for our Audit, Compensation and Nominating & Governance Committees as well as our Codes of Business Conduct and of Ethics, which can be accessed free of charge at http://www.infosonics.com/corporate_governance.aspx.

Risks Relating to Our Business

The major portion of our business relating to distribution of Samsung products in Argentina has ended and we may not be able to replace those sales.

Our distribution agreement with Samsung expired March 31, 2012. We are working diligently to replace the lost distribution revenues with higher margin sales of our verykool^® products through expansion into new geographic markets in Asia Pacific, Europe, Africa, Latin America and the United States. However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in this effort or whether it can be accomplished in a timely manner or at all.

The loss or reduction in orders from principal customers or a reduction in prices we are able to charge these customers will have a negative impact upon our financial results.

Our three largest customers for the year ended December 31, 2012, represented 16%, 11% and 9% of our net sales, respectively. The markets we serve and are targeting for future business are subject to significant price competition and our customers are not contractually obligated to purchase products from us. For these and other reasons, such as competitive pricing and competitive pressures, customers may seek to obtain products or services from us at lower prices than we have been able to charge in the past, and they could terminate our relationship or reduce their purchases from us in favor of lower-priced alternatives. In addition, we have experienced losses of certain customer bases through industry consolidation, a trend that may increase in our markets, and in the ordinary course of business. The further loss of any of our principal customers, a reduction in the amount of product or services our principal customers order from us or the inability to maintain current terms, including price, with these or other customers could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

We have been experiencing net losses and expect that net losses will continue for an uncertain period. If we continue to operate at a loss, our business may not be financially viable.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, our net loss was $2.5 million. We have now reported six consecutive loss years with an aggregate net loss of $22.1 million. As of December 31, 2012, our cash and restricted cash balances were $6.2 million, we had net working capital of $16.3 million and we had no

7

Table of Contents

outstanding debt. Given the continued economic slowdown, our business now being focused on proprietary products without established markets and the uncertainty of most global markets, we cannot adequately evaluate the financial viability of our business or our long-term prospects with any certainty. While our business plan includes a number of objectives to achieve profitability, if we do not succeed in these objectives, our business might continue to experience losses and may not be sustainable in the future.

We may not succeed in our development, introduction and establishment of proprietary products in our markets.

The development, introduction and establishment of new products in our proprietary verykool^® line requires a significant investment in research and product development, manufacturing and marketing. Our development team in Beijing China has had success with delivery of new products, but has also encountered delays and design challenges, and may not be successful in developing the differentiated products we need to ultimately implement our strategy successfully. In addition, our new products may not be well received by our customers or the end-users. Further, failure to adequately carry out our product marketing, sales and delivery strategy or otherwise be successful in promoting our verykool^® brand may result in inventory obsolescence, including inventory which we have built in anticipation of market acceptance of our products. If any of these events occur, our financial condition and operating results would be negatively impacted.

Our operating results may vary significantly, which may cause our stock price to fluctuate.

Our operating results are influenced by a number of factors that may cause our sales and operating results to fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter. These factors include:

Our operating performance may cause our stock price to fluctuate. Between January 1, 2012 and March 20, 2013, our stock price has fluctuated between $1.78 and $0.52 per share, and we anticipate that significant volatility in our stock price will continue for the foreseeable future.

The termination of our secured credit facility in the fall of 2010 has restricted the availability of liquidity.

Historically, one of our primary sources of liquidity has been borrowing from bank lines of credit. Our secured bank credit facility with Wells Fargo Trade Capital LLC terminated on September 22, 2010. While we believe that our current cash resources and working capital are sufficient to fund our operations for the foreseeable future, we do not currently have a permanent letter of credit facility, which may impede our procurement operations. Failure to secure a replacement bank credit facility on acceptable terms could adversely affect our ability to support future growth in our business.

We face many risks relating to intellectual property rights.

Our business will be harmed if we and/or our manufacturers are found to have infringed intellectual property rights of third parties, or if our intellectual property protection is inadequate to protect proprietary rights used in our verykool^® product line.

8

Table of Contents

Because our proprietary verykool^® products are comprised of complex technology, we may be subject to or impacted by litigation regarding intellectual property rights. Third parties may assert intellectual property infringement claims against us and against our manufacturers. Defending claims may be expensive and divert the time and efforts of our management and employees. Increasingly, third parties have sought broad injunctive relief in our industry, which could ultimately limit our ability to sell our verykool^® products. If any litigation arises and we do not succeed in such litigation, we could be required to expend significant resources to pay damages, develop non-infringing intellectual property or to obtain licenses to the intellectual property that is the subject of such litigation. However, we cannot be certain that any such licenses, if available at all, will be available to us on commercially reasonable terms. In some cases, we might be forced to stop delivering certain or all of our verykool^® products if we or our manufacturers are subject to a final injunction or other restrictions.

We attempt to negotiate favorable intellectual property indemnities with our manufacturers for infringement of third-party intellectual property rights, but we may not be successful in our negotiations. Also, any manufacturer’s indemnity may not cover any or all damages and losses suffered by us due to a potentially infringing verykool^® product, and a manufacturer may not choose to accept a license or to modify or replace its products with non-infringing products, which would otherwise mitigate such damages and losses. Further, we may not be able to participate in intellectual property litigation involving a manufacturer or influence any ultimate outcome that may adversely impact our sales, such as an injunction or other restrictions that relating to our verykool^® products.

In addition, it may be possible for a third party to obtain and use our or our manufacturers’ proprietary information or develop similar technology relating to our verykool^® products independently. Furthermore, effective patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret protection may be unavailable or limited, especially in certain foreign countries, such as China where adherence to enforcement of intellectual property rights is not as prevalent or available as in other countries, such as the United States. Unauthorized use of our or our manufacturers’ intellectual property rights by third parties and the cost of any litigation necessary to enforce our or our manufacturers’ intellectual property rights could have an adverse impact on our business.

Virtually all of our revenues during the year ended December 31, 2012 were, and for the near future will likely continue to be, generated outside of the United States in countries that may have volatile currencies or other risks.

The vast majority of our sales activities are conducted in territories and countries outside of the United States, primarily in Latin America, and to a lesser extent in Europe and Asia Pacific. Historically, the majority of our sales transactions were denominated in U.S. dollars and therefore may be impacted by changes in the strength of the U.S. dollar relative to the foreign economies where we conduct business. Certain sales transactions in Mexico are denominated in the Mexican peso, which has been a very volatile currency. Further, the fact that we sell all of our products into, and have developed and manufactured products in, a number of territories and countries other than the United States exposes us to, among other things, increased credit risks, customs duties, import quotas and other trade restrictions, potentially greater and more unpredictable inflationary and currency pressures, labor risks and shipping delays. Changes may occur in social, political, regulatory and economic conditions or in laws and policies governing foreign trade, manufacturing, development and investment in the territories and countries where we currently develop and sell products. United States laws and regulations relating to investment and trade in foreign countries could also change to our detriment. We are particularly exposed to the fact that all our R&D and manufacturing activities are in China, which may change its own policies on business and foreign investment in companies there. Any of these factors could have material adverse effects on our business and operations. Also, although we purchase and sell products in U.S. dollars and do not engage in significant exchange swaps, futures or options contracts or other hedging techniques, fluctuations in currency exchange rates could reduce demand for products sold in U.S. dollars. We cannot predict the effect that future exchange rate fluctuations will have on our operating results or financial position. We may in the future engage in currency hedging transactions, which could result in our incurring significant additional financial risks, including increased costs and losses resulting from these transactions.

9

Table of Contents

We may not be able to adequately respond to rapid technological changes in the wireless handset industry, which could cause us to lose customers.

The technology relating to wireless handsets changes rapidly, resulting in product obsolescence or short product life cycles. We are required to anticipate future technological changes in our industry and to continually identify, obtain and market new products that will satisfy evolving industry and customer requirements. Although we are now making significant investments in R&D to keep our proprietary verykool^® products competitive in terms of technology and features, there is no guarantee we will have success with this, which could materially affect our business. Competitors or manufacturers of wireless handsets may market products which have perceived or actual advantages over products that we market or which otherwise render those products obsolete or less marketable. Furthermore, if we do not adequately anticipate future technological changes, we may not establish appropriate supplier relationships or perform appropriate product development. These factors all pose significant risks to loss of customers and decreased sales and profitability.

Substantial defaults by our customers on accounts receivables could have a significant negative impact on our cash flow and financial condition.

We offer open account terms to certain of our customers, both large and small, which may subject us to credit risks, particularly to the extent that our receivables represent sales to a limited number of customers or are concentrated in particular geographic markets. A substantial default by a major customer could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, cash flow and results of operations.

We rely on our information technology systems to function efficiently, without interruptions, and if they do not, customer relationships could be harmed.

We are dependent upon our information systems to manage our business and to be responsive to our customers needs, and we plan to implement a new ERP system in 2013. These systems may experience interruptions, including interruptions of related services from third-party providers which may be beyond our control. Such business interruptions could cause us to fail to meet customer requirements and could result in the loss of business relationships. All information technology systems, both internal and external, are potentially vulnerable to damage or interruption from a variety of sources, including, without limitation, computer viruses, security breaches, energy blackouts, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication failures, as well as third-party provider failures. We have implemented various measures to manage our risks related to system and network disruptions, but a systems failure or security breach or other problem with our information technology systems could negatively impact our operations and financial results.

We face risks related to our dependence on third parties to manufacture our proprietary verykool^® products.

Our third party manufacturers typically provide limited or no warranties on their products. We generally pass through any warranties received from our manufacturers to our customers, and in absence of such warranties, we are solely responsible for the products. If a product we source from a manufacturer has delivery, quality or performance problems, our ability to provide satisfactory products to our customers could be disrupted (including, for example, during and after Chinese New Year) and our reputation could be impaired. We also may not be able to sell these products before payment is due our manufacturers or at prices above our cost. Any of these risks could have a negative impact on our business and operations.

The wireless handset industry is intensely competitive and we may not be able to continue to compete against well-established competitors with greater resources.

We compete for sales of wireless handsets and accessories with numerous well-established manufacturers, carriers and distributors, sometimes including our own suppliers and customers. Many of our competitors possess greater financial and other resources than we do and may market similar products or services directly to our customers or potential customers. Sourcing and distribution of wireless handsets and accessories has generally had low barriers to entry. As a result, additional competitors may choose to enter our industry in the future. The

10

Table of Contents

markets for wireless handsets and accessories are characterized by intense price competition and significant price erosion over the life of a product. Many of our competitors have the financial resources to withstand substantial price competition and to implement extensive advertising and promotional programs, both generally and in response to efforts by additional competitors to enter into new markets or introduce new products. Our ability to continue to compete successfully will depend largely on our ability to maintain our current industry relationships, with both manufacturers and carrier customers, as well as differentiate our verykool^® branded products from the competition. We may not be successful in anticipating and responding to competitive factors affecting our industry or these relationships, including introduction of new products, changes in consumer preferences, demographic trends, new or changing outsourcing requirements, the entry of additional well-capitalized competitors, international, national, regional and local economic conditions, and competitors’ discount pricing and promotion strategies. As wireless telecommunications markets mature, and as we seek to enter into new markets and offer new products, the competition that we face may change and grow more intense.

We rely on trade secret laws and agreements with our key employees and other third parties to protect our proprietary rights, which may not afford adequate protection.

We rely on trade secret laws to protect our proprietary knowledge, particularly, the information and technology related to our verykool^® brand, our database of customers and suppliers and business terms such as pricing. In general, we also have non-disclosure agreements with our key employees and limit disclosure of our trade secrets and other proprietary information. These measures may prove difficult to enforce and may not prove adequate to prevent misappropriation of our proprietary information.

We are dependent on a small number of personnel.

Our success depends in large part on the abilities and continued service of our executive officers, particularly Joseph Ram, our CEO and largest stockholder, and other key employees, including our verykool^® design team members in China. If we are unable to retain our executive officers or other key personnel, it could impede our ability to fully and timely implement our business plan and future growth strategy. In addition, in order to support our continued growth, we will be required to effectively recruit, develop and retain additional qualified management. Competition for such personnel is intense, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully attract, assimilate or retain sufficiently qualified personnel.

We may become subject to lawsuits alleging medical risks associated with our wireless handsets, the cost of which could be substantial.

Lawsuits or claims have been filed or made against manufacturers of wireless handsets alleging possible medical risks, including brain cancer, associated with the electromagnetic fields emitted by wireless handsets. There has been only limited relevant research in this area, and this research has not been conclusive as to what effects, if any, exposure to electromagnetic fields emitted by wireless handsets has on human cells. Substantially all of our revenues are derived, either directly or indirectly, from sales of wireless handsets. We may become subject to lawsuits filed by plaintiffs alleging various health risks from our products. If any future studies find possible health risks associated with the use of wireless handsets, or if any damages claimed against us or a business partner is successful, it could have a material adverse effect on our business. Even an unsubstantiated perception that health risks exist could adversely affect our ability or the ability of our customers to market wireless handsets.

Risks Related To Our Common Stock

The market for our common stock is volatile and our stock price could decline.

An active trading market for our common stock may not be sustained, which could affect the ability of our stockholders to sell their shares and could depress the market price of their shares. The stock market in general, including the market for telecommunications-related stocks in particular, has been highly volatile. For example, the price of our common stock has fluctuated between $1.78 and $0.52 from January 1, 2012 through March 20, 2013.

11

Table of Contents

The market price of our common stock has been and is likely to remain volatile, and investors in our common stock may experience a decrease in the value of their stock, including decreases unrelated to our operating performance or prospects, resulting in a substantial loss on their investment.

We may be delisted from The NASDAQ Stock Market if we do not satisfy continued listing requirements.

At various times over the last several years we faced potential delisting from The NASDAQ Stock Market for failure to maintain the minimum $1.00 bid price per share requirement for continued listing. Once again, on December 10, 2012, we received a Nasdaq Staff Deficiency letter indicating that, for the prior thirty consecutive business days, the bid price for our common stock had closed below the minimum $1.00 per share requirement for continued listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2). In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), we have been provided an initial period of 180 calendar days, or until June 10, 2013, to regain compliance. The letter states that the Nasdaq staff will provide written notification that we have achieved compliance with Rule 5550(a)(2) if at any time before June 10, 2013, the bid price of our common stock closes at $1.00 per share or more for a minimum of ten consecutive business days.

We intend to monitor the bid price of our stock and consider available options if our stock does not trade at a level likely to result in us regaining compliance with Nasdaq’s minimum bid price rule by June 10, 2013. If we do not regain compliance with Rule 5550(a)(2) by June 10, 2013, we may be eligible for an additional 180 calendar day compliance period. To qualify, we would be required to meet the continued listing requirement for market value of publicly held shares and all other initial listing standards for The Nasdaq Capital Market, with the exception of the bid price requirement, and would need to provide written notice of our intention to cure the deficiency during the second compliance period, by effecting a reverse stock split, if necessary. However, if it appears to the Nasdaq Staff that we will not be able to cure the deficiency, or if we are otherwise not eligible, Nasdaq will notify us that our stock will be subject to delisting. In the event of such a notification, we may appeal the Staff’s determination to delist our stock, but there can be no assurance the Staff would grant our request for continued listing.

If our common stock were delisted from The NASDAQ Stock Market, you may find it difficult to dispose of your shares and our share price may be adversely affected.

If our common stock were to be delisted from The NASDAQ Capital Market, trading of our common stock most likely would be conducted in the over-the-counter market on an electronic bulletin board established for unlisted securities such as OTC Pink, OTCQX, OTCQB or the OTC Bulletin Board. Such trading would reduce the market liquidity of our common stock. As a result, an investor would find it more difficult to dispose of, or obtain accurate quotations for the price of, our common stock, thereby negatively impacting the share price of our common stock.

If our common stock is delisted from The NASDAQ Capital Market and the trading price remains below $5.00 per share, trading in our common stock might also become subject to the requirements of certain rules promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which require additional disclosure by broker-dealers in connection with any trade involving a stock defined as a “penny stock” (generally, any equity security not listed on a national securities exchange or quoted on The NASDAQ Stock Market that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions). Many brokerage firms are reluctant to recommend low-priced stocks to their clients. Moreover, various regulations and policies restrict the ability of stockholders to borrow against or “margin” low-priced stocks, and declines in the stock price below certain levels may trigger unexpected margin calls. Additionally, because brokers’ commissions on low-priced stocks generally represent a higher percentage of the stock price than commissions on higher priced stocks, the current price of the common stock can result in an individual stockholder paying transaction costs that represent a higher percentage of total share value than would be the case if our share price were higher. This factor may also limit the willingness of institutions to purchase our common stock. Finally, the additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by these requirements could discourage broker-dealers from facilitating trades in our common stock, which could severely

12

Table of Contents

limit the market liquidity of the stock and the ability of investors to trade our common stock, thereby negatively impacting the share price of our common stock.

The ability of our stockholders to control our policies or effect a change in control of our company is limited, which may not be in our stockholders’ best interests.

Some provisions of our charter and bylaws and the General Corporation Law of Maryland, under which we are incorporated, may delay or prevent a change in control of our company or other transactions that could provide our common stockholders with a premium over the then-prevailing market price of our common stock or that might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders. These include the ability of our Board of Directors to authorize the issuance of preferred stock without stockholder approval, which preferred stock may have voting provisions that could delay or prevent a change in control or other transaction that might involve a premium price or otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders. Maryland law imposes restrictions on some business combinations and requires compliance with statutory procedures before some mergers and acquisitions can occur. These provisions of Maryland law may have the effect of discouraging offers to acquire us even if the acquisition would be advantageous to our stockholders.

Stockholders have been and may be diluted as a result of past or future offerings or other financings or equity grants.

We have raised and may in the future raise additional capital through one or more public offerings, private placements or other financings involving our securities and have made or may make stock option and other equity incentive grants. As a result of these financings or grants, ownership interests in us may be diluted, potentially substantially.

Our largest stockholder may have strategic interests that differ from those of our other stockholders, and can significantly influence important corporate matters.

As of March 1, 2013, our Chief Executive Officer Joseph Ram, beneficially owned approximately 30% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, Mr. Ram may be able to significantly influence corporate actions relating to:

Not Applicable.

13

Table of Contents

Our corporate headquarters office is located in San Diego, California. Our verykool^® R&D facility is located in Beijing, China and we have a small quality control office located in Shenzhen, China, close to our contract manufacturers. All of these facilities are occupied pursuant to operating leases. The table below summarizes information concerning those leases, but does not include local sales tax, VAT tax or common area maintenance charges where applicable:

We believe that these facilities are adequate for our current requirements and that suitable alternative or additional space will be available as needed for alternative space or to accommodate future expansion of our operations.

Viamport Litigation

On May 22, 2012, a lawsuit was filed against the Company in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic (Case No. FP-12-461) by Viaimport, SRL, a former customer of the Company, and served on the Company on July 12, 2012. The complaint alleges breach of contract and seeks U.S. $1 million in damages. The Company believes that this case is without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself. In addition, on August 31, 2012, the Company filed a lawsuit against Viaimport and its principal, Omar Hassan, in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County Florida (Case No. 12-34647CA32) for non-payment of purchase obligations aggregating $288,559 and other damages. Although both lawsuits are in their early stages, at this time we do not believe it will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. However, the ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to these matters cannot be estimated with certainty and the Dominican Republic case is complicated by its foreign venue.

Steelhead Litigation

On January 14, 2013, Steelhead Licensing LLC (“Steelhead”) filed a patent infringement lawsuit against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, alleging that certain of our products infringe claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,491,834. Steelhead is seeking injunctive relief as well as the recovery of unspecified monetary damages. We do not believe we infringe the Steelhead patent and intend to defend ourselves vigorously. Due to the inherent uncertainty of litigation, we cannot identify probable or estimable damages related to the lawsuit at this time.

The Company may become involved in certain other legal proceedings and claims which arise in the normal course of business. Other than as described above, as of the filing date of this report, the Company did not have any significant litigation outstanding.

Not Applicable.

14

Table of Contents

PART II

Our Common Stock trades on The NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “IFON.” The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low trading prices of our Common Stock as reported by The NASDAQ Stock Market:

As of March 20, 2013 the closing price of our common stock on The NASDAQ Capital Market was $0.60, and there were approximately nine stockholders of record.

We have not paid any cash dividends and do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

The information regarding equity compensation plans is incorporated by reference into Item 12 of this Form 10-K, which incorporates by reference the information set forth in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement in connection with the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days following the end of the 2012 fiscal year.

Unregistered Issuances.

None for applicable period.

Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities.

None for applicable period.

Not Applicable.

Our management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our accompanying Consolidated Audited Financial Statements and related notes, as well as the “Risk Factors” and other information contained in this annual report. The discussion is based upon, among other things, our Consolidated Audited Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to, among other things, make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosures of contingent liabilities at the financial statement dates and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We review our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our estimates are based on our historical

15

Table of Contents

experience and other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results are likely to differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions, but we do not believe such differences will materially affect our financial position or results of operations, although they could. Our critical accounting policies, the policies we believe are most important to the presentation of our financial statements and require the most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, are outlined below in “Critical Accounting Policies.” All references to results of operations in this discussion are references to results of continuing operations, unless otherwise noted.

Overview and Recent Developments

We are a provider of wireless handsets (which may be referred to herein as “phones”, “cell phones”, “mobile phones”, “feature phones” and “smartphones”) and accessories to carriers, distributors and OEMs in Latin America, Asia Pacific, Europe and Africa. We design, develop, source and sell our proprietary line of products under the verykool^® brand and on a private label basis to certain customers (collectively referred to as verykool^® products). verykool^® products include entry-level, mid-tier and high-end feature phones and Android-based smartphones. We first introduced the verykool^® brand in 2006, and have been working to gain brand identity and grow sales. We are now in the midst of a transformation of our company as we move from our former existence as a distributor of phones designed, developed and manufactured by others, to our new business model of designing, manufacturing, sourcing and selling our own verykool^® products. During the year ended December 31, 2012, 92% of our sales were comprised of verykool^® products and we are now focused on growing our revenue base for these products.

For the past five years, our business has had two primary components: (1) legacy distribution of wireless handsets supplied by major manufacturers, primarily Samsung, and (2) provision of our own proprietary verykool^® products that we originally sourced from independent design houses and original design manufacturers (“ODMs”). Our revenue peaked in 2006 when we recorded approximately $241 million of net sales. In 2009, more than 95% of our net sales of approximately $231 million were derived from distribution sales of Samsung product to carriers in Argentina. In late 2009, however, a stiff import tariff on certain electronic devices, including wireless handsets, was enacted in Argentina. The tariff had a significant negative impact on our sales beginning in the first quarter of 2010, and ultimately resulted in a decrease of 69% of our sales volume in 2010 compared to 2009. Then, in February 2011, Argentina enacted a further import regulation effective March 6, 2011 which signaled the closing stage of our distribution business. Our distribution agreement with Samsung was scheduled to expire December 31, 2011 but was extended until March 31, 2012 to accommodate the orderly conclusion of this business. Since April 1, 2012 , our business has and will continue to be centered on our verykool^® product line.

Prior to 2010 we sourced all our verykool^® phones from independent design houses and ODMs in China. In late 2009, with a desire to improve our time-to-market, better protect our technology and know-how and improve our cost structure, we began to search for an experienced management team to serve as the core for an in-house design team based in Beijing. In April 2010 we recruited a team of very experienced management and technical personnel who now serve as both our design house for all our markets and as the base for marketing and selling our products in Asia-Pacific. This team currently consists of 55 employees, primarily engineers, located in Beijing. The quarter ended June 30, 2010 was the first full quarter of operation of our China subsidiary. Its expenses are classified as R&D expenses on our statement of operations, together with any NRE (non-recurring engineering) expenses paid to other design houses. We shipped our first product designed by our China team to a customer in China in October 2010 and shipped 6 other new models to customers during 2011. Although we expect to continue to use outside design houses to augment the efforts of our China development team, in 2013 we plan to increase the portion of our portfolio of products that are internally designed. All of our manufacturing continues to be done by contract manufacturers in China.

Areas of Management Focus and Performance Indicators

We focus on the needs of our customers, developing and sourcing new and innovative products, fostering close relationships with manufacturers, and expanding our business in our current markets and entering into new

16

Table of Contents

geographic markets, all while maintaining close attention to operational efficiencies and costs. We are particularly focused on increasing sales volumes of higher margin proprietary products in a cost effective manner to enable us to return to profitability, as well as monitoring and managing levels of accounts receivable and inventory to minimize risk. Performance indicators that are important for the monitoring and management of our business include top line sales growth, cost of sales and gross margin percentage, operating expenses in absolute dollars and as a percent of revenues and operating and net income (loss). We rely upon our in-house software management system to exercise real-time control over many elements of our business including customer relationship management, purchasing, inventory management and control, sales order control and pricing management.

Management and employees spend a significant amount of time traveling to Latin America and Asia Pacific with the purpose of spending time with our key customers, suppliers, our Beijing design team and other contractors and employees. We believe that these relationships are vital to our success and we will continue to dedicate a significant amount of time to this area.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Critical accounting policies are those policies that, in management’s view, are most important in the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations. The notes to our consolidated Financial Statements also include disclosure of significant accounting policies. The methods, estimates and judgments that we use in applying our accounting policies have a significant impact on the condition and results that we report in our financial statements. These critical accounting policies require us to make difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates and assumptions regarding matters that are inherently uncertain. Our critical accounting policies and estimates and assumptions that require the most significant judgment are discussed further below.

Revenue Recognition and Allowance for Returns

Revenues for wireless handset and accessory sales are recognized when (i) shipment of the products to customers has occurred and title has passed, (ii) when collection of the outstanding receivables is probable and (iii) the final price of the products is determined, which occurs at the time of shipment. Sales are recorded net of discounts, rebates, cooperative marketing arrangements, returns and allowances. On select sales, we may agree to cooperative arrangements wherein we agree to fund future marketing programs related to the products purchased by the customer. Such arrangements are usually agreed to in advance. The amount of the co-op allowance is recorded as a reduction of the sale and added to accrued expenses as a current liability. Subsequent expenditures made pursuant to the arrangements reduce this liability. To the extent we incur costs in excess of the established cooperative fund, we recognize the amount as a selling or marketing expense. As part of the sales process, we may perform certain value-added services such as programming, software loading and quality assurance testing. These value-added services are considered an ancillary component of the sales process and amounts attributable to these processes are included in the unit cost to the customer. Furthermore, these value-added services are related to services prior to the shipment of the products, and no value-added services are provided after delivery of the products. We recognize as a reserve against the related receivables estimates for product returns based on historical experience and other judgmental factors, evaluate these estimates on an ongoing basis and adjust our estimates each period based on actual product return activity. We recognize freight costs billed to our customers in sales and actual freight costs incurred as a component of cost of sales.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We provide for the possible inability to collect accounts receivable by recording an allowance for doubtful accounts. We evaluate the collectability of our accounts receivable on an ongoing basis. In circumstances where we are aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations, we record a specific allowance against amounts due in order to reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount we reasonably believe will be

17

Table of Contents

collected, after consideration for accounts receivable insurance coverage we may have. For all other customers, we recognize allowances for doubtful accounts based on the length of time the receivables are past due, the current business environment and our historical experience.

Inventory Reserves

We regularly monitor inventory quantities on hand and record a provision for excess, slow moving and obsolete inventories based primarily on historical usage rates and our estimated forecast of product demand and expected pricing. We attempt to tightly control our inventory levels and in the recent past have moved more to a build-to-order model. However, because we need to place non-cancelable orders with our contract manufacturers with a lead time of 30 to 60 days, and because we may not have a confirmed customer purchase order in hand as quickly as we would like to, we sometimes take inventory risk. As our products get closer to end-of-life status, we are more strict about our build-to-order policy in order to limit our inventory exposure on older product.

Results of Operations:

The following table sets forth certain items from our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss as a percentage of net sales for the periods indicated:

We do not believe that inflation had a significant impact on our results of operations for the periods reported in our Consolidated Audited Financial Statements.

Year Ended December 31, 2012 Compared With Year Ended December 31, 2011

Net Sales

For the year ended December 31, 2012, our net sales of $34.3 million decreased by $0.6 million, or 1.7%, compared to net sales of $34.9 million in 2011. The significant decrease in our distribution business from 2011 to 2012 was almost entirely offset by the increase in sales of our branded verykool^® products. Our Samsung distribution business ended March 31, 2012 as a consequence of a stiff import tariff on certain electronic devices, including wireless handsets, that was enacted in Argentina in November 2009 and an additional import regulation which became effective in March 2011. These protective import actions began to negatively affect our sales beginning in the first quarter of 2010, accelerated through 2010 and continued through the end of 2011. In 2012,

18

Table of Contents

our Samsung distribution sales declined by $10.7 million, or 81%, to $2.5 million from $13.2 million in 2011. Nearly offsetting this decline was an increase in sales of our branded verykool^® products of $10.1 million, or 47.3%, to $31.6 million from $21.4 million in 2011. This represented a record year for sales of verykool^® products, both in terms of dollar value and units sold.

Cost of Sales, Gross Profit and Gross Margin

For the year ended December 31, 2012, cost of sales was $27.5 million, 80.2% of net sales, and gross margin was 19.8%, compared to cost of sales of $30.3 million, 87.0% of net sales, and a 13.0% gross margin for the year ended December 31, 2011. In 2012, our gross profit amounted to $6.8 million, an increase of 49.9% from $4.5 million in 2011. The significant improvements in both our gross profit and our gross margin percentage are primarily a result of the shift in the mix of sales to a lower concentration of distribution sales and a higher concentration of branded sales incident to the expiration of our distribution agreement with Samsung. Sales of our verykool^® branded products typically result in higher gross margins than our distribution sales. In 2011, distribution sales comprised 38% of total revenues, with 62% represented by branded sales. In 2012, distribution sales fell to 8% of total revenues, with 92% coming from sales of branded verykool^® products.

Operating Expenses and Operating Loss from Continuing Operations

For the year ended December 31, 2012, operating expenses of $9.3 million increased by $2.2 million, or 31.5%, from $7.1 million in 2011. Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses increased by $1.6 million and R&D spending increased by $0.6 million. The increased SG&A expenses include increases in the following areas: personnel additions in the sales, logistics and service departments, sales commissions on increased sales of verykool^® branded products, marketing, homologation and an isolated bad debt recorded in the first quarter of 2012. The increased R&D expenses are primarily the result of increased headcount during the second half of 2012 to enable the contemporaneous development of a number of new smartphone models. In December 2012, as these developments drew to a close, we finalized a plan to eliminate the headcount redundancies in the first quarter of 2013 and restructure our China workforce. Severance costs for the terminated employees of $100,000 were recorded in the fourth quarter of 2012 and are also included in R&D expense for the year.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, we sustained an operating loss from continuing operations of $2.5 million, equal to the operating loss of $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The $2.2 million increase in gross profit in 2012 was offset by the $2.2 million increase in operating expenses. We expect that the restructuring in China noted above will result in an annual savings of $600,000 per year once it is completed in the first quarter of 2013.

Interest Expense and Other Income

During the year ended December 31, 2012, other income (expense) included $72,000 of expense comprised of $48,000 of foreign exchange losses and a $24,000 loss on disposal of fixed assets. We also recorded $61,000 of interest income primarily related to financed customer receivables. In 2011 we had $30,000 of other income, consisting primarily of gain on sale of fixed assets, and $11,000 of interest income on a tax refund.

19

Table of Contents

Net Loss

Because other income (expense) in both 2012 and 2011 were minimal, our net losses in both years were substantially equivalent to the losses from continuing operations for the respective years.

Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared With Year Ended December 31, 2010

Net Sales

For the year ended December 31, 2011, our net sales of $34.9 million decreased by $37.6 million, or 51.9%, compared to net sales of $72.5 million in 2010. The significant decline was primarily the continued effect of a stiff import tariff on certain electronic devices, including wireless handsets, that was enacted in Argentina in November 2009 and an additional import regulation which became effective in March 2011. These protective import actions began to negatively affect our sales beginning in the first quarter of 2010, accelerated through 2010 and continued through the end of 2011. In 2011, our Samsung distribution sales declined by $47.8 million, or 78%, to $13.2 million from $61.0 million in 2010. Partially offsetting this decline was an increase in sales of our branded verykool^® products of $10.2 million, or 90.3%, to $21.4 million from $11.3 million in 2010.

Cost of Sales, Gross Profit and Gross Margin

For the year ended December 31, 2011, cost of sales was $30.3 million, 87.0% of net sales, and gross margin was 13.0%, compared to cost of sales of $67.7 million, 93.4% of net sales, and a 6.6% gross margin for the year ended December 31, 2010. In 2011, our gross profit amounted to $4.5 million, a decrease of 5.3% from $4.8 million in 2010. The dramatic improvement in our gross margin is largely a result of the shift in the mix of sales to a lower concentration of distribution sales and a higher concentration of branded sales. Sales of our verykool^® branded products typically result in higher gross margins than our distribution sales. In 2010, distribution sales comprised 84% of total revenues, with only 16% represented by branded sales. In 2011, distribution sales fell to 38% of total revenues, with 62% coming from branded sales.

Operating Expenses and Operating Loss from Continuing Operations

For the year ended December 31, 2011, operating expenses of $7.1 million decreased by $1.7 million, or 19.9%, from $8.8 million in 2010. Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses declined by $2.3 million, but this reduction was partially offset by an increase in R&D spending of $0.6 million related to our new development team in Beijing that was established in April 2010 to focus on our verykool^® products. The majority of the SG&A decrease was related to reduction of expenses that were variable with sales volume, which decreased 52% in 2011 compared to 2010. Although we made reductions in other expenses as well, such reductions were not proportionate to the decline in sales. We significantly reduced marketing and legal expenses in 2011 compared to 2010 and reduced occupancy expenses through the closure of our Miami distribution center in March 2011. As a percentage of net sales, total operating expenses increased to 20.2% in 2011 compared to 12.1% in 2010, primarily due to the reasons outlined above.

For the year ended December 31, 2011, we sustained an operating loss from continuing operations of $2.5 million compared to an operating loss of $4.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The 38% reduction in the operating loss in 2011 was achieved despite a 52% reduction in net sales. We generated slightly less gross profit, more than doubled our gross profit margin percentage and reduced operating expenses.

20

Table of Contents

Interest Expense and Other Income

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we had no bank borrowings and consequently no interest expense. Interest expense in 2010 of $23,000 related to borrowings under our bank revolving line of credit in the first half of the year. The line of credit was terminated on September 22, 2010. In 2011 we had $11,000 of interest income on a tax refund and $30,000 of other income consisting primarily of gain on sale of fixed assets.

Loss from Continuing Operations

For the year ended December 31, 2011, we sustained a loss from continuing operations of $2.5 million compared to a loss of $3.6 million in 2010. The 2010 loss from continuing operations benefited from a tax refund of $423,000 from the carry back of net operating losses in 2007 and 2008 to prior years.

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations

During the second quarter of 2008, we assessed opportunities in the United States and Mexico and decided to implement actions necessary to close sales operations in both of those countries, which we substantially completed in the second half of 2009, although we generated $44,000 in income from discontinued operations during 2010 from the salvage sale of remaining inventories. The discontinuation was completed in 2011 without any further income or loss.

Net Loss

Because the results of discontinued operations in both 2011 and 2010 were minimal, our net losses in both years were substantially equivalent to the losses from continuing operations for the respective years.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Historically, we have used cash from our sale of products and lines of credit (bank and vendor) to provide the capital needed to support our business. In late 2011 we added a new foreign exchange (“FX”) hedging facility with our bank as a tool to hedge our exposure to changes in certain foreign currency exchange rates. We electively terminated this facility in the first quarter of 2013 and the restricted cash supporting it was returned to our general cash reserves.

The primary drivers affecting our cash and liquidity are net income (losses) and working capital requirements. Capital equipment is not significant in our business, and at December 31, 2012 we did not have any material commitments for capital expenditures. Our largest working capital requirement is for accounts receivable, and, to a lesser extent, inventory, as we strive to minimize our inventory levels. We typically bill customers on an open account basis subject to our standard credit quality and payment terms ranging between net 30 and net 60 days. If our net revenue increases, it is likely that our accounts receivable balance will also increase. Our accounts receivable could further increase if customers delay their payments or if we grant them extended payment terms.

As of December 31, 2012, we had $6.2 million of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and $16.3 million of working capital compared to $12.4 million of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and $18.6 million of working capital as of December 31, 2011. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had no bank debt.

As of December 31, 2012, cash and cash equivalents consisted of cash on hand and in bank accounts.

Operating Activities

Net cash used by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2012 amounted to $5.9 million compared to $0.1 million of cash provided by operations for the year ended December 31, 2011. Although the net

21

Table of Contents

loss of $2.5 million in 2012 was equal to the $2.5 million loss in 2011, our business contracted significantly in 2011 compared to 2010 and the reduction in receivables in 2011 was the largest factor in the stabilization of cash that year.

In 2012, we used $4.4 million of cash to fund our net working capital requirements. This included a $1.9 million increase in trade accounts receivable, reflecting a larger share of our fourth quarter sales to carrier customers who traditionally pay slower on purchases they make during the holiday season. Days sales outstanding in receivables at December 31, 2011 was 109 days, which was significantly greater than the 65 days at December 31, 2011. We also used $1.4 million to increase our inventory levels, although this was partially offset by a $1.1 million reduction in prepaid inventories. An additional $1.9 million was used to reduce payables and accruals and $0.3 million for other assets.

In 2011, we generated $1.6 million of positive cash flow from a reduction in net working capital. This consisted primarily of a $3.7 million reduction in trade accounts receivable, reflecting the 51.9% drop in annual revenue for the year, and $0.5 million from a reduction in other receivables. Days sales outstanding in receivables at December 31, 2011 was 65 days, which was a significant improvement over 77 days at December 31, 2010. Partially offsetting the reduction in receivables was an increase in inventories and prepaids of $2.4 million and a net reduction in payables and accruals of $0.2 million.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $0.4 million and $1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Cash used in both years included investment in tooling and molds for our proprietary verykool^® products. In 2011, we also invested $1.0 million in a restricted cash account to secure our obligations under a new FX hedging facility with our bank.

Financing Activities

There were no financing activities in the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. Net cash used in financing activities in the year ended December 31, 2010 of $25.5 million represented the complete retirement of outstanding balances under our then existing revolving credit facility. Pursuant to that bank facility, we could borrow up to $45 million based on a borrowing base of our accounts receivable and inventories. The credit facility was secured by all our assets. On July 22, 2010, although we had no outstanding borrowings at the time and were in compliance with all of our covenants under the credit facility, we received a notice from the lender of its election to terminate the credit facility on September 22, 2010, the end of the 60-day notice period. It is our belief that the principal reasons for the lender’s actions were the decreased utilization of the facility by us, the high level of capital reserves required by the lender to support the facility and our lack of profitability.

Based on our current outlook for our business, we believe that our current cash resources and working capital are sufficient to fund our operations for the foreseeable future. However, our cash and working capital needs could change significantly if our business grows rapidly or losses continue. The lack of a line of credit could inhibit our growth. For this reason, we continue evaluating potential lines of credit or alternate financing vehicles.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At December 31, 2012, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Contractual Obligations

We lease corporate and administrative office facilities and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases. Rent expense under these leases was approximately $385,000, $406,000 and $483,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. At December 31, 2012, we had no amounts outstanding related to any debt obligations.

22

Table of Contents

The following is a schedule of aggregate future minimum rental payments required by the above leases (in thousands):

The primary objective of the following information is to provide forward-looking quantitative and qualitative information about our potential exposure to market risks. The term “market risk” for us refers to the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in interest rates and various foreign currencies. The disclosures are not meant to be precise indicators of expected future losses, but rather indicators of reasonably possible losses. This forward-looking information provides indicators of how we view and manage our ongoing market risk exposures.

Interest Rates

At December 31, 2012, we had no outstanding interest bearing debt and no rate-sensitive investments.

Foreign Exchange and Other Risks

At December 31, 2012 and 2011, foreign currency cash accounts in Mexican pesos amounted to $105,000 and $64,000, respectively. Also at December 31, 2012, accounts receivable denominated in Mexican pesos amounted to $271,000. Prior to December 2011, all of our sales transactions were denominated in U.S. dollars. Beginning in December 2011, we began to price sales in foreign currencies only to certain customers in Mexico. Product costs, and the majority of our operating expenses are also denominated in U.S. dollars, but payroll and other costs of our Beijing development team are denominated in Chinese Yuan Renminbi.

Foreign currency risks are associated with our cash, receivables, payroll and payables denominated in foreign currencies. Fluctuations in exchange rates will result in foreign exchange gains and losses on these foreign currency assets and liabilities, which are included in other income (expense) in our consolidated statements of operations. At December 31, 2011 we had a single foreign currency forward contract in the amount of $303,000. There were no forward contracts outstanding at December 31, 2012.

As a result of our international sales, our future operating results could be adversely affected by a variety of factors, including changes in specific countries’ political, economic or regulatory conditions and trade protection measures, particularly China. Our market risk management includes an accounts receivable insurance policy for our foreign sales, as well as any domestic sales. However, there can be no assurance that our insurance policy will substantially offset the impact of fluctuations in currency exchange rates, political, economic or regulatory conditions on its results of operations and financial position. We do not believe that foreign currency fluctuations had a material impact on our financial results during 2012, 2011 or 2010.

The information required by this item is included below in “Item 15 Exhibits, Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules” and incorporated by reference herein.

None.

23

Table of Contents

(i) Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation was performed pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report. These disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that this information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on the evaluation, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report.

(ii) Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in the Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012 as required by the Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(c). In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth in the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2012. This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to law, rules and regulations that permit us to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.

(iii) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our fourth fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2012, that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

None.

24

Table of Contents

PART III

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement related to the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days following the end of the fiscal year.

We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to our President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller and a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees. Copies of these codes are available on our website (www.infosonics.com) and are also available without charge upon written request directed to Investor Relations, InfoSonics Corporation, 3636 Nobel Drive, Suite 325, San Diego, California 92122.

If we make changes to our Code of Ethics or Code of Business Conduct and Ethics in any material respect or waive any provision of either such Code for certain management persons covered by either such Code, we expect to provide the public with appropriate notice of any such change or waiver by publishing a description of such event on our corporate website, www.infosonics.com, or by other appropriate means as required by applicable rules of the SEC.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement related to the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days following the end of the fiscal year.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement related to the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days following the end of the fiscal year.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement related to the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days following the end of the fiscal year.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement related to the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days following the end of the fiscal year.

25

Table of Contents

PART IV

(a) The following documents, included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K (see F-pages herein regarding financial statement information) are incorporated herein by reference and filed as part of this report:

(1) Financial statements:

The consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, together with notes thereto.

(2) Financial statement schedule:

Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.

(3) Exhibit index

26

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

27

Table of Contents

INFOSONICS CORPORATION

Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December  31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

Table of Contents

F-1

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

InfoSonics Corporation

San Diego, California

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of InfoSonics Corporation as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of InfoSonics Corporation listed in Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of InfoSonics Corporation as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/s/ SINGERLEWAK LLP

Irvine, California

March 22, 2013

F-2

Table of Contents

INFOSONICS CORPORATION

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-3

Table of Contents

INFOSONICS CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-4

Table of Contents

INFOSONICS CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(Amounts in thousands)

Accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-5

Table of Contents

INFOSONICS CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Amounts in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-6

Table of Contents

NOTE 1—ORGANIZATION AND LINE OF BUSINESS

InfoSonics Corporation (“InfoSonics”) was incorporated in February 1994 in the state of California and reincorporated in September 2003 in the state of Maryland. InfoSonics and its subsidiaries, Axcess Mobile, LLC (“Axcess Mobile”), InfoSonics Latin America, Inc., InfoSonics de Mexico S.A. de C.V., InfoSonics de Guatemala S.A., InfoSonics El Salvador S.A. de C.V., InfoSonics S.A., InfoSonics Colombia S.A., verykool USA, Inc., InfoSonics de Panama, verykool Hong Kong Limited, and verykool Wireless Technology Limited (collectively, the “Company”), develop, manufacture and sell wireless telecommunication products and accessories to wireless carriers, distributors, retailers, dealer agents and OEMs. The Company markets its branded products throughout Latin America and on a private label basis in certain countries in Asia Pacific, Europe and Africa. The Company has also recently re-entered the United States market.

NOTE 2—DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company assessed its distribution business in the United States and Mexico. Due to the changing environment and consolidation in the United States of the smaller regional cellular carriers (one of the Company’s then target markets) into larger national carriers, along with the Company’s inability to penetrate the Mexico market due to challenges of fostering sales relations with the dominant cellular carriers there, management determined that it was necessary to take decisive actions to mitigate further losses. The Company implemented actions necessary to close operations related to sales operations in both of those countries. As of December 31, 2011, the discontinuance of both the domestic and Mexican businesses was complete. The results of the discontinued operations are as follows (in thousands):