Singularity Future Technology Ltd. - Annual Report: 2016 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016

or

¨ TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________to ___________

Commission file number 001-34024

Sino-Global Shipping America, Ltd.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

1044 Northern Boulevard, Suite 305

Roslyn, New York 11576-1514
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(718) 888-1814
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.

Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes ¨ No x

The aggregate market value of voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of December 31, 2015, the last business day of the registrant's second fiscal quarter, was approximately $4,592,698.

The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of September 8, 2016 was 8,280,535.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

None.

SINO-GLOBAL SHIPPING AMERICA, LTD.

FORM 10-K

INDEX 

INTRODUCTION

Unless the context otherwise requires, in this annual report on Form 10-K:

Names of certain PRC companies provided in this Form 10-K are translated or transliterated from their original PRC legal names. Discrepancies, if any, in any table between the amounts identified as total amounts and the sum of the amounts listed therein are due to rounding.

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Form 10-K contains certain statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such forward-looking statements, including but not limited to statements regarding our projected growth, trends and strategies, future operating and financial results, financial expectations and current business indicators are based upon current information and expectations and are subject to change based on factors beyond our control. Forward-looking statements typically are identified by the use of terms such as “look,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “might,” “believe,” “plan,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate” and similar words, although some forward-looking statements are expressed differently. The accuracy of such statements may be impacted by a number of business risks and uncertainties we face that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated, including but not limited to the following:

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to update this forward-looking information. Nonetheless, the Company reserves the right to make such updates from time to time by press release, periodic report or other method of public disclosure without the need for specific reference to this Report. No such update shall be deemed to indicate that other statements not addressed by such update remain correct or create an obligation to provide any other updates.

 PART I

Overview

Sino-Global Shipping America, Ltd. (“Sino”), a Virginia corporation, was founded in the United States (“US”) in 2001. Sino is a non-asset based global shipping and freight logistic integrated solution provider. Sino provides tailored solutions and value added services to its customers to drive effectiveness and control in related aspects throughout the entire shipping and freight logistic chain. Our current service offerings consist of shipping agency services and inland transportation management services .We temporarily suspended our ship management services from the beginning of the fiscal year 2016, primarily due to changes in market condition. We also temporarily suspended our shipping and chartering services primarily as a result of the termination of vessel acquisition in December 2015.

The Company conducts its business primarily through its wholly-owned subsidiaries in the U.S., China (including Hong Kong), Australia and Canada. Currently, a significant portion of our business is generated from the clients located in the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”), and our operations are currently primarily conducted in the PRC.

Company Structure and Function

The Company conducts its business primarily through its wholly-owned subsidiaries in China (including Hong Kong), Australia, Canada, and U.S. (New York and Los Angeles).

The Company’s subsidiary in China, Trans Pacific Shipping Limited (“Trans Pacific Beijing”), a wholly owned foreign enterprise, invested in one 90%-owned subsidiary, Trans Pacific Logistics Shanghai Limited (“Trans Pacific Shanghai”. Trans Pacific Beijing and Trans Pacific Shanghai are referred to collectively as “Trans Pacific”). As PRC laws and regulations restrict foreign ownership of local shipping agency service businesses, the Company provided its shipping agency services in the PRC through Sino-Global Shipping Agency Ltd. (“Sino-China” or “VIE”), a Chinese legal entity, which holds the licenses and permits necessary to operate local shipping agency services in the PRC. Trans Pacific Beijing and Sino-China do not have a parent-subsidiary relationship. Trans Pacific Beijing has contractual arrangements with Sino-China and its shareholders that enable the Company to substantially control Sino-China. Through Sino-China, the Company was able to provide local shipping agency services in all commercial ports in the PRC. In light of the Company’s decision not to pursue the local shipping agency business, the Company temporarily suspended its shipping agency services through its VIE and has not undertaken any business through or with Sino-China since June 2014. Nevertheless, the Company continues to maintain its contractual relationship with the VIE because Sino-China is one of the committee members of China Association of Shipping Agencies & Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carriers (“CASA”). CASA was approved to form by China Ministry of Communications. Sino-China is also our only entity that is qualified to do shipping agency business in China. We keep the VIE to prepare ourselves for the market to turn around.

The Company’s shipping agency business was operated by its subsidiaries in Hong Kong and China. The Company’s ship management services were originally operated by its subsidiary in Hong Kong. Due to changes in market condition, the Company temporarily suspended the ship management services from fiscal year 2016. The Company’s shipping and chartering services are operated by its offices in the US and subsidiaries in Hong Kong. The Company also temporarily suspended its shipping and chartering services primarily as a result of the termination of vessel acquisition in December 2015. Currently, the Company’s inland transportation management services are operated by its subsidiaries in China (including Hong Kong) and the US.

Corporate History and Our Business

Since our inception in 2001 and through our fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, our sole business was providing shipping agency services. In general, we provide two types of shipping agency services, loading/discharging services and protective agency services, in which we act as a general agent to provide value added solutions to our customers. For loading/discharging agency services, we receive the total payment from our customers and pay the port charges on behalf of our customers. For protective agency services, we charge a fixed amount as agent fee while customers are responsible for the payment of port costs and expenses. Under these circumstances, we generally require payments in advance from customers and bill the balances within 30 days after the transactions are completed. We believe the most significant factors that directly or indirectly affect our shipping agency service revenues are:

While we were able to consistently generate net revenues from shipping agency business, this business does not become profitable largely due to the rising operating costs associated with doing business in China. In light of consecutive years of operating losses and concerns raised by the US regulators over our VIE structure, the Company decided to reorganize its business structure in fiscal year 2013. Commencing in the later part of fiscal year 2013 and continuing in fiscal year 2014, we took various actions to restructure our business with the goal of achieving a certain level of profitability. As a result of these business reorganization efforts, we optimized our cost structure, reduced our dependency on shipping agency business, and shifted our shipping agency operation from our VIE to our wholly-owned subsidiaries in China including Hong Kong.

In June 2013, the Company executed a 5-year global logistic service agreement with TEWOO Chemical & Light Industry Zhiyuan Trade Co., Ltd, which is controlled by Tianjin Zhi Yuan Investment Group Co., Ltd (“Zhiyuan”). Zhiyuan is controlled by Mr. Zhong Zhang, who purchased 1,800,000 shares of our common stock for approximately $3 million in April 2013 as approved by our Board of Directors and shareholders, which made Mr. Zhang our largest shareholder. Leveraging our business relationship with Zhiyuan, we expanded our service offerings to include shipping and chartering services and inland transportation management services to diversify our business. Leveraging our in-depth knowledge and extensive resources of shipping industry, inland transportation management services are our tailored value-added solution developed for Zhiyuan to prevent high-priced bulk from damage or loss during its inland transportation from warehouses to factories. Given the industry norm of 12% of loss rate during transportation, our integrated inland transportation solution significantly reduced the bulk losses and effectively addressed the issues in freight logistic chain. Furthermore, after we have conducted an effective trial for Zhiyuan to reduce their bulk losses at end of September 2014, Tengda Northwest Ferroalloy Co., Ltd. (“Tengda Northwest”) signed a contract with us to mitigate their bulk losses through our inland transportation management services.

In May 2014, the Company signed a strategic cooperation agreement with Qingdao Zhenghe Shipping Group Limited (“Zhenghe”), one of the largest shipping and transportation companies in China, to jointly explore mutually beneficial business development opportunities. In June 2014, Mr. Deming Wang, a major owner of Zhenghe, acquired 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. In August 2014, the Company executed an agreement to acquire all of the equity of Longhe Ship Management (Hong Kong) Co., Limited (“LSM”) from Mr. Wang, to further broaden our scope of services and expertise in the ship management business. Due to market condition and high operating costs associated with this business line, the Company decided to temporarily suspend the ship management business starting from the fiscal year 2016.

On April 10, 2015, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Rong Yao International Shipping Limited, a Hong Kong company (the “Vessel Seller”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to acquire, subject to a number of closing conditions, “Rong Zhou,” an 8,818 gross tonnage oil/chemical transportation tanker (the “Vessel”) from the Vessel Seller; and in connection therewith, the Company issued to the Vessel Seller 1.2 million shares of its restricted common stock representing $2,220,000 of the $10.5 million purchase price for the Vessel. 9 On December 7, 2015, the Company and the Vessel Seller entered into a supplemental agreement to terminate the proposed Vessel acquisition.

The Company received the cash of $330,000 from the Vessel Seller in December 2015 in connection with the termination. The 1.2 million shares was returned to the Company on February 12, 2016 and was cancelled thereafter.

In January 2016, the Company formed a new subsidiary, Sino-Global Shipping LA Inc. (“Sino LA”), for the purpose of expanding its business to provide import security filing services with U.S Customs and Department of Homeland Security, on behalf of importers who ship goods into the U.S. and also providing inland transportation services to these importers in the U.S. On April 18, 2016, Sino LA signed a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with Yaxin International Co., Ltd.(“Yaxin”), pursuant to which Sino LA will provide logistics services to Yaxin, who ships goods via containers into the U.S. and places them on Amazon.com. The services include cargo forwarding, customs filing and declaration, trucking and others.

In May 2016, the Company entered into a strategic partnership with Shandong Hi-speed TEU Logistics Co., LTD. ("Shandong Hi-speed TEU"), which belongs to one of China's largest state-owned enterprises, Shandong Hi-Speed Group Co., Ltd., to jointly establish a platform for coordinated transport between China and North America. The Company and Shandong Hi-speed TEU intend to cooperate in creating a standardized network that will unite carriers of the twenty-foot equivalent units or TEUs in China via sea and rail and coordinate with parties in North America and Australia. The companies will serve both upstream and downstream customers through the platform, establish a door-to-door logistics and provide supply chain service.

Our Strategy

Our strategy is to:

Our Management Team

We believe we have a strong and experienced management team including our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, Mr. Lei Cao; our Acting Chief Financial Officer, Ms. Tuo Pan; our Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Zhikang Huang; and our Chief Technical Officer, Mr. Africa Li, who, together as a team, have many years of experience, extensive business connections in the shipping industry in China, substantial experience in SEC reporting and compliance, business reorganization, mergers and acquisitions, accounting, risk management and operating both public and private companies.

Business Segments

As of June 30, 2016, Sino-Global delivers shipping agency services and inland transportation management services to customers.

Historically, the Company was in the business of solely providing shipping agency services. In the fiscal year of 2014, by leveraging the support of Sino-Global’s largest shareholder, Mr. Zhang and the company he controls, Zhiyuan Investment Group, the Company expanded its service platform to include shipping and chartering services during the quarter ended September 30, 2013 and inland transportation management services during the quarter ended December 31, 2013. We temporarily suspended shipping and chartering services as a result of the termination of the vessel acquisition in December 2015. With the acquisition of LSM in 2014, we added ship management services to our service platform but we temporarily suspended it in 2016 primarily due to market conditions. With the establishment of Sino-LA, we added cargo forwarding services to our service platform in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year 2016, which is included in our inland transportation business line.

Our Goals and Strategic Plan

By leveraging our fine reputation, extensive business relationships, technical ability and in-depth knowledge of the shipping industry, our goal is to further strengthen our position as a leading global logistic solution provider who offers innovative resolutions to better address complex issues in different aspects in the entire shipping and freight logistic chain.

We historically focused our business on providing our customers with customized shipping agency services. In the past, our business came predominately from our strong business relationships with our key strategic partners in China. To reduce our dependency on a single business line, we have leveraged, and will continue to leverage, our business relationships with strategic partners to introduce new service offerings to the market and to diversify our business. In light of the slowdown of the Chinese economy and its negative impact on the shipping business across Pacific Ocean, our strategic plan for the next 5 years is to continue to diversify our service mix and actively seek new growth opportunities to expand our business footprint in the U.S. market to reduce our dependency on the revenue generated from China. For decades, the shipping industry has been operated under traditional business models without many meaningful changes. Today, technological innovation has already played a big role in changing every conventional industry. We believe internet is going to be a big part of future logistic chain services and a transformative era in shipping and freight logistic business is coming. As an innovative solution provider, we plan to apply our technical ability and industry expertise and to utilize cutting-edge information technology in the conventional shipping business to better connect supply and demand and to develop seamless linkages in logistic chains.

Given recent changes in the market condition in China and the increases in labor costs, our operating costs increased significantly in recent years and we incurred operating loss for the year ended June 30, 2016. To address our rising operating costs, our plan is to continue to optimize our service mix and cost structure by streamlining our operations, adding more high-margin services and closing out inefficient, unprofitable or non-operating business.

As a result of our continued restructuring efforts, we implemented two new services of shipping and chartering services and inland transportation management services to our business lines in fiscal year 2014. Although we temporarily suspended our shipping and chartering services in December 2015 due to the termination of vessel acquisition, and we also temporarily suspended our ship management services segment since fiscal year 2016, the inland transportation management service segment diversified our business platform and enhanced our profit margin to a certain extent. As shown in the table below, the restructuring efforts have reduced our dependency on the shipping agency business and improved our overall gross margin from 34.6% as of June 30, 2014 to 48.9% as of June 30, 2016 as we changed our service mix and focused on delivering higher-margin services as mentioned above.

Our Customers

Since our initial public offering, our revenues come primarily from key customers. In light of our strategic relationship with Zhiyuan Investment Group that began with the signing of a 5-year global logistic service agreement in June 2013, we expanded our business platform to include additional service offerings. We started to provide inland transportation management services to a third-party customer, Tengda Northwest Ferroalloy Co., Ltd. (“Tengda”), since the quarter ended September 2014. Revenue from Tengda amounted to approximately $1.9 million and $2.3 million, respectively, or approximately 27% and 20% of total revenues for fiscal year 2016 and 2015, respectively. As we continue to diversify our service platform, our goal is to reduce our dependency on the key customers. For the year ended June 30, 2016, two customers accounted for approximately 31% and 27% of the Company’s revenues, respectively. For the year ended June 30, 2015, two customers accounted for approximately 23% and 20% of the Company’s revenues, respectively.

Our Suppliers

Our operations consist of working directly with our customers to understand in detail their needs and expectations and then managing local suppliers to ensure that our customers’ needs are met. Our significant suppliers include Monson Agencies Australia Pty Ltd, Baoshan Iron and Steel Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Gangcheng Dangerous Goods Logistics Co., Ltd. For the year ended June 30, 2016, three suppliers accounted for 27%, 15% and 10% of the total cost of revenues, respectively. For the year ended June 30, 2015, two suppliers accounted for 51% and 14% of the total cost of revenues, respectively.

Our Strengths

We believe that the following strengths differentiate us from our competitors:

Our Opportunities

For more than thirty years, the shipping and freight logistic industry has been operated under traditional business models without many meaningful changes. Many of these business practices are inefficient and problematic, therefore, maintaining an innovative mindset is critical to achieving continuous business success and growth. We are a value-added logistic solution provider with successful past performance and individuals that have been in the industry for a long time. Instead of playing the traditional logistic broker role, we focus on providing technology solutions and innovative leading-edge services to bridge the asset-based world with the digital world. We shape our industry practice and profit model by analyzing wider developments both in the global markets and the technology industry so we can address unique problems that are currently pervasive across the shipping and freight logistic industry.

We believe we can capture the business opportunity and grow our business organically or through acquisitions or strategic alliance by:

Our Challenges

We are facing significant challenges when executing our strategy, including:

Our Competition

The market segments that we serve do not have high entry barriers. There are many companies ranging from small to large in China that provide shipping and freight related logistic services. At present, the state-owned companies still dominate the industry and generate majority of the revenues in the industry. These companies have greater service capabilities, customer base and financial, marketing, network and human resources than we do. Most of them concentrate their business on shipping agency services to meet general market demand. However, we focus on providing tailored solutions and value added services to selected high-profile customers to drive effectiveness and control in related aspects throughout the entire shipping and freight logistic chain. As a boutique company that provides specialized services with limited resources and history, we face intense competition in the particular market segments that we serve. Our primary competitors are LBH Group and Gulf Agency Company Ltd. Our ability to be successful in our industry depends on our deep understanding of the complexity of industry issues and challenges and our technical ability to develop best solutions to respond to the identified issues and provide effective problem solving strategies to our targeted customers to achieve the fastest and most cost-effective outcomes. Our value added services and innovative approaches are highly recognized by our customers, which helps us to gain additional market share and compete effectively with the companies that may be better capitalized than we are or may provide services we do not or cannot provide to our customers.

Employees

As of the date of this report, we have 27 employees, 16 of whom are based in China. Of the total, four are in management, thirteen are in operations, seven are in finance and accounting and three are in administration and technical support. We believe that our relationship with our employees is good. We have never had a work stoppage, and our employees are not subject to a collective bargaining agreement.

Recent Development

In July 2016, the Company signed a Strategic Cooperation Agreement (the "Agreement") with COSCO Logistics (Americas) Inc. ("COSCO Logistics"), which belongs to China's largest integrated shipping company, China COSCO Holdings Company Ltd. Pursuant to the Agreement, both parties will mutually provide logistics services between China and the United States and develop shipping customers as an end-to-end global logistics service. The Company expects to work with COSCO Logistics to provide inland transportation services in the US for shipments to and from China. According to the Agreement, the two companies will also assess locations in the US to potentially establish warehouse / distribution facilities in the coming months and share pricing information for short-haul trucking services across selected regions of the country. Since Sino-LA was established in January 2016, the Company has been working to integrate inland trucking services including cargo forwarding, trucking and customs declaration and filing services to both coasts in the US. The Company is seeking additional customer relationships and believes this partnership will broaden its potential customer base.

In August 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized management to move forward with the development of a mobile application that will provide a full-service logistics platform between the US and China for short-haul trucking services in the US. The decision follows an extensive review by the Company's management team and Board in identifying Sino’s key competitive advantages as an expert in global logistics between the US and China, and then leveraging that experience to both address the needs of its customer base and provide solutions to current issues affecting logistics and supply chain. The Company completed a market analysis and feasibility study related to building a mobile based logistics application for short-haul trucking in US ports to better manage the over 25 million containers, or TEU moving between China and the US each year.

Risks Related to Our Business

We have a history of operating losses and may not have sufficient liquidity to execute our business plan or to continue our operations without obtaining additional funding or selling additional securities. We may not be able to obtain additional funding under commercially reasonable terms or issue additional securities.

We reported a net loss attributable to Sino-Global Shipping America, Ltd. of approximately $2 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, compared to approximately $0.7 million of net income for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. As of June 30, 2016, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $4.5 million.

As of June 30, 2016, we had $1.4 million in cash or cash equivalents. Our management believes that we will have sufficient liquidity in fiscal year 2017 to finance our anticipated operations, as well as achieve projected cash collections from customers. Additionally, we may enter into new business segments through selected merger and acquisitions that may require us to obtain additional funding or issue additional securities. Changes in our business conditions or the financial markets could limit our access to existing credit facilities or make new sources of financing more costly or commercially unviable. Changes in China’s currency exchange control regulations could also limit our ability to access cash outside of China to meet liquidity requirements for our planned operations or intended acquisitions in China. If additional funding is not obtained, we may need to reduce, defer or cancel development programs to the extent necessary. The failure to fund our capital requirements would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our relatively limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate our future prospects and results of operations.

Founded in the US in 2001, we have a relatively limited operating history. Accordingly, you should consider our future prospects in light of the risks and uncertainties typically experienced by companies such as ours in evolving industries. Some of these risks and uncertainties relate to our ability to:

If we are unsuccessful in addressing any of these risks and uncertainties, our business may be materially and adversely affected.

We have historically relied on a limited number of customers for a substantial portion of our business.

In fiscal year 2014, we commenced providing shipping and chartering services and inland transportation management services to a single customer, the Zhiyuan Investment Group, an entity controlled by Mr. Zhang, our largest shareholder. We temporarily suspended our shipping and chartering services in fiscal year 2016 as a result of the termination of the vessel acquisition. The nature of our business is driven by the needs of our clients, and we cannot predict when, or if ever, we will receive another order for our services from the Zhiyuan Investment Group. For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, $2,269,346 (or 31%) and $2,545,009 (or 22.5%) of our net revenues, respectively, resulted from providing inland transportation management services to the Zhiyuan Investment Group. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 $1,977,996 (or 69%) and $2,143,606 (or 39.8%) of our gross profit, respectively, came from providing inland transportation management services to the Zhiyuan Investment Group. If we do not provide inland transportation management services to the Zhiyuan Investment Group in the future, our business and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. Further, we cannot guarantee that we would be able to replace this customer with one or more new customers of similar size. In fiscal year 2015, we commenced providing inland transportation management services to a third-party customer Tengda. For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, Tengda accounted for approximately 27% and 20% of the Company’s total net revenues, respectively. Our business will be materially and adversely affected if we fail to retain any of these key customers or our collaborative partners over whom we are very dependent fail to perform as expected.

We have limited operating history in inland transportation management services businesses and cannot guarantee that we will be able to operate well and compete effectively in this business area.

Prior to fiscal year 2014, our sole line of business was providing shipping agency services. We expanded our services to include inland transportation management services in the quarter ended December 31, 2013. As we are a fairly new entrant into this business line, we do not have a significant market presence. Currently, we only provide inland transportation services to two customers: the Zhiyuan Investment Group and Tengda. We may not have been able to enter into this business line without our relationship with Mr. Zhang, and we cannot guarantee that we will be successful in securing and providing inland transportation management services contracts for other customers on acceptable terms, if at all. We may not be able to retain our existing customers as the proprietary rights of our solutions are not protected and our customers could terminate the business relationship with us after they have mastered the skills to solve the problems. In addition, we may not be able to fully collect our outstanding accounts receivable within a reasonable time frame as Chinese economy is slowing resulting in the shipping business gets scaled down.

We recently established Sino LA to provide cargo forwarding services in the US and cannot guarantee that we will be able to operate successfully and compete effectively in this business area.

In fiscal year 2016, the Company formed a new subsidiary Sino LA and signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Yaxin International Co., Ltd. to provide cargo forwarding, customs filing and declaration, trucking and other related services. If we are not able to successfully retain this customer, we may not be able to compete effectively in this business location and acquire new customers as it is a highly competitive market. In addition, this particular industry has a standardized three months of payment term that might increase the pressure on our operating cash flow.

The fees that we received from the Zhiyuan Investment Group for our shipping and chartering services and inland transportation management services may not be indicative of the fees that we may receive for the same services provided to unaffiliated customers and may be materially lower, which would have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

We cannot provide any assurances that the fees we have received from the Zhiyuan Investment Group for our shipping and chartering and inland transportation management services are indicative of the fees that we may receive if we are able to obtain non-affiliated customers for these services. The fees that we may receive from non-affiliated customers may be less than what we have received from our affiliated customer, and could possibly be so low as to make these lines of business unprofitable, which would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and could require us to terminate such service lines.

Our revenue will be materially and adversely affected if our new service offerings does not gain market acceptance.

Our new service offerings may not gain market acceptance in the shipping logistic industry. To directly market and offer our service offerings, we and/or our collaborative partners may require a marketing and sales force with appropriate technical expertise and supporting distribution capabilities. We may not be able to further establish sales, marketing and distribution capabilities or enter into arrangements with third parties on acceptable terms. If we or our partners cannot successfully promote our new services, our ability to generate additional revenue will be limited.

We have entered into a number of business arrangements that are significant to us with two of our shareholders including Mr. Zhang, our largest shareholder, and through Mr. Zhang, the Zhiyuan Investment Group, who is controlled by Mr. Zhang. The failure to maintain our business relationship with either or both of such shareholders would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

In April 2013, as approved by our Board of Directors and shareholders, Mr. Zhang purchased 1,800,000 shares of our common stock for approximately $3 million, which as of the date of this report represents approximately 21.6% of our issued and outstanding common stock, resulting in Mr. Zhang becoming our largest shareholder. As a result of Mr. Zhang’s desire to find business opportunities that would mutually benefit us and the Zhiyuan Investment Group, a company controlled by Mr. Zhang, which owns a number of businesses in China, in June 2013, we signed a 5-year Global Logistic Service Agreement with two parties, one of which was the Zhiyuan Investment Group and the other was TEWOO Chemical & Light Industry Zhiyuan Trade Co., Ltd. (“Tewoo”). Thereafter, during the quarter ended September 30, 2013, we executed a shipping and chartering services agreement with the Zhiyuan Investment Group, pursuant to which we assisted the Zhiyuan Investment Group in the transportation of approximately 51,000 tons of chromite ore from South Africa to China; and in September 2013, we executed an inland transportation management service contract with the Zhiyuan Investment Group pursuant to which we agreed to provide certain advisory services and assist the Zhiyuan Investment Group in attempting to control its potential commodities loss during the transportation process. On a one time basis, we executed a one year short-term loan agreement with the Zhiyuan Investment Group, effective January 1, 2014, to facilitate the working capital needs of the Zhiyuan Investment Group. During fiscal year 2016 and 2015 we continued to provide inland transportation management services to the Zhiyuan Investment Group. The net amount due to us from the Zhiyuan Investment Group at June 30, 2016 and 2015 was approximately $1.6 million and $2.6 million of trade receivables, respectively.

As a result of our business relationship with Mr. Zhang and Mr. Wang, we added shipping and chartering, inland transportation management and ship management services to our service platform. Such shipping and chartering services and inland transportation management services generated approximately 66% and 91% of our net revenues and gross profit in fiscal year 2016, respectively, approximately 42% and 75% of our net revenues and gross profit, respectively, for the year ended June 30, 2015.

Based upon the above, the failure by us to maintain our existing business relationship with Mr. Zhang and Mr. Wang would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

The shipping agency business is very competitive in nature and many of our competitors have greater financial, marketing and other resources than we have.

In connection with shipping agency service, our main competitors include: LBH Group and Gulf Agency Company. These competitors have significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources and name recognition than we have. In addition, we also face competition from a large number of smaller, local shipping agents. Our competitors may introduce new business models, and if these new business models are more attractive to customers than the business models we currently use, our customers may switch to our competitors’ services, and we may lose market share. We believe that competition in worldwide shipping agency industry may become more intense as more shipping agencies, including Chinese/foreign joint ventures, are qualified to conduct business. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully against any new or existing competitors, or against any new business models our competitors may implement. In addition, the increased competition we anticipate in the shipping agent industry may also reduce the number of vessels for which we are able to provide shipping agency services, or cause us to reduce agency fees in order to attract or retain customers. All of these competitive factors could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

We believe that our competitors in the inland transportation management services business, have greater name recognition, significantly more experience, financial, marketing and other resources than we have and we expect to face intense competition in this business segment.

We launched the inland transportation management services business in December 2013. Our competitors have greater experience and name recognition than we do, which is a competitive disadvantage to us. Further, our competitors are larger than us and have greater financial and marketing resources than we have, which also puts us at a significant competitive disadvantage. Since larger competitors may be able to offer the same services we offer at lower rates than what we would need to charge to operate profitably, this would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operation.

The barriers to enter into the business segments in which we operate are low and we may face competition from new entrants into these business segments.

The number of competitors offering the same services that we do may increase in the future since the barriers to entry are low. Increases in competition could lead to revenue reductions, reduced profit margins, or a loss of market share, any one of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Our customers are engaged in the shipping industry, and, consequently, our financial performance is dependent upon the economic conditions of that industry.

We derive our revenues from providing services to customers in the business of shipping materials to China and our success is dependent upon our customer’s shipping needs. Our customers’ shipping needs are intrinsically linked to economic conditions in the shipping industry in general and trade with China in particular. The shipping industry, in turn, is subject to intense competitive pressures and is affected by overall economic conditions. Accordingly, demand for our services could be harmed by instability or downturns in the shipping industry, reductions in trade between China and other countries or a combination of both which could materially lower demand or cause our customers to forego the shipping agency services we provide by attempting to provide such services in-house. If any of the foregoing occurs, it would have a material adverse effect on our business and our results of operations.

We may be required to assume liabilities for our clients in the future.

An increasing number of companies that require shipping agency services have pressured shipping agents to guarantee their clients’ liabilities. Some companies have required shipping agents, as a condition of doing business, to pay for tariffs, port charges, and other fees, or to pay these fees with the promise of reimbursement at a later date. Other companies have sought to include shipping agents as parties in voyage charter agreements, leading to potential liability for shipping agents in the event of a breach by another party. We expect that these pressures on shipping agents to accept more liability will increase as competition among shipping agencies intensifies. While we do not currently pay these liabilities and have no present intention to begin doing so in the future, the assumption of any of these or other liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

We are heavily dependent upon the services of experienced personnel who possess skills that are valuable in our industry, and we may have to actively compete for their services.

We are a small company with limited resources, and we compete in large part on the basis of the quality of services we are able to provide our clients. As a result, we are heavily dependent upon our ability to attract, retain and motivate skilled personnel to serve our clients. Many of our personnel possess skills that would be valuable to other companies engaged in one or more of our business lines. Consequently, we expect that we will have to actively compete with other Chinese shipping agencies to retain these employees. Some of our competitors may be able to pay our employees more than we are able to pay to retain them. Our ability to profitably operate is substantially dependent upon our ability to locate, hire, train and retain our personnel. Although we have not experienced difficulty locating, hiring, training or retaining our employees to date, there can be no assurance that we will be able to retain our current personnel, or that we will be able to attract and assimilate other qualified personnel in the future. If we are unable to effectively obtain and maintain skilled personnel, the quality of the shipping services that we provide could be materially impaired, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

We are substantially dependent upon our key personnel.

Our performance is substantially dependent on the performance of our executive officers and key employees. In particular, the services of:

• Mr. Lei Cao, Chief Executive Officer;

• Ms. Tuo Pan, Acting Chief Financial Officer; and

• Mr. Zhikang Huang, Chief Operating Officer

would be difficult for us to replace. While we have employment contracts with each of our executive officers, such contracts may be terminated in certain circumstances by the executive officers. Moreover, we do not have any “key person” life insurance policies on any of our employees. The loss of the services of any of our executive officers or other key employees could substantially impair our ability to effectively execute our business and expand our service platform, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

We need to maintain our relationships with local shipping agents.

Our shipping agency business is dependent upon our relationships with local agents operating in the ports where our customers ship their products. As a general agent, substantially all of our shipping agency revenues have been derived from services delivered by the local agents and we believe local agent relationships will remain critical to our success in the future. We have a number of local agents that account for a significant portion of our business, the loss of one or more of which could materially and negatively impact our ability to retain and service our customers. We cannot be certain that we will be able to maintain and expand our existing local agent relationships or enter into new local agent relationships, or that new or renewed local agent relationships will be available on commercially reasonable terms. If we are unable to maintain and expand our existing local agent relationships, renew existing local agent relationships, or enter into new local agent relationships, we may lose customers, customer introductions and co-marketing benefits, and our business and results of operations may suffer significantly.

We are dependent on third party carriers and inland transportation companies to transport our client’s cargo.

We rely on commercial ocean freight carriers and inland transportation companies, for the movement of our client’s cargo. Consequently, our ability to provide services for our clients could be adversely impacted by: shortages in available cargo capacity; changes by carriers and transportation companies in policies and practices such as scheduling, pricing, payment terms and frequency of service or increases in the cost of fuel, taxes and labor; and other factors not within our control. Reductions in ocean freight capacity could negatively impact our yields. Material interruptions in service or stoppages in transportation, whether caused by strike, work stoppage, lock-out, slowdown or otherwise, could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our profitability depends on our ability to effectively manage our cost structure as we grow the business.

As we continue to attempt to increase our revenues through the expansion of our service offerings, we must maintain an appropriate cost structure to maintain and increase our profitability. While we intend to increase our revenues by increasing the number and quality of the shipping services we provide by strategic acquisitions, and by maintaining and expanding our gross profit margins by reducing costs, our profitability will be driven in large part by our ability to manage our agent commissions, personnel and general and administrative costs as a function of our net revenues. There can be no assurances that we will be able to effectively control our costs and failure to do so would result in lack of profitability, which would have a material adverse effect our business and results of operations.

Comparisons of our operating results from period to period are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indicator of future performance.

Our operating results have fluctuated in the past and likely will continue to fluctuate in the future because of a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. In fiscal year 2016 and 2015 a substantial portion of our revenues was derived from the Zhiyuan Investment Group whose business we believe are tied closely to economic trends and consumer demand that can be difficult to predict. There can be no assurance that our historic operating performance will continue in future periods as we cannot assume or provide any assurance that the Zhiyuan Investment Group will continue to utilize our services, or have the same level of demand for our services that it had in fiscal year 2016 and 2015. Because our quarterly revenues and operating results vary significantly, comparisons of our period-to-period results are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indicator of future performance.

We have not paid any dividends and we do not foresee paying dividends in the future.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future, if ever. Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our financial condition, operating results, capital requirements, Virginia and PRC laws, and other factors that our Board of Directors deems relevant.

Foreign Operational Risks

We do not have business liability or disruption insurance.

We do not have any business liability or disruption insurance coverage for our operations. Any business interruption, litigation or natural disaster may result in our business incurring substantial costs and the diversion of resources.

We rely on contractual arrangements with our VIE for our operations, which may not be as effective in providing control over these entities as direct ownership.

Although we have temporarily suspended doing business through our VIE, Sino-China, our operations and financial results might in the future dependent on it, in which we have no equity ownership interest and must rely on contractual arrangements to control and operate the businesses of our VIE. These contractual arrangements are not as effective in providing control over the VIE as direct ownership. For example, the VIE may be unwilling or unable to perform its contractual obligations under our commercial agreements. Consequently, we would not be able to conduct our operations in the manner currently planned. In addition, the VIE may seek to renew its agreements on terms that are disadvantageous to us. Although we have entered into a series of agreements that provide us with substantial ability to control the VIE, we may not succeed in enforcing our rights under them insofar as our contractual rights and legal remedies under PRC law are inadequate. In addition, if we are unable to renew these agreements on favorable terms when these agreements expire or enter into similar agreements with other parties, our business may not be able to operate or expand, and our operating expenses may significantly increase.

In January 2015, China’s Ministry of Commerce unveiled a draft legislation that could change how the government is regulating corporate structures, especially for VIEs controlled by foreign investments. Instead of looking at “ownership”, the draft law focused on the entities or individuals hold control of a VIE. If a VIE is deemed to be controlled by foreign investors, it may be barred from operating in restricted sectors or the prohibited sectors listed on a “negative list”, where only companies controlled by Chinese nationals could operate, even if structured as VIEs. As of the report date, no formal legislation has been implemented.

In the event that the draft law is implemented in any form, and that the Company’s business was characterized as one of the “restricted” or “prohibited” sectors, the VIE the Company currently maintains contractual arrangements with may be barred from operation which may adversely affect our business if the market for shipping agent services turn around and we intend to resume such business operation with our VIE.

The economy of China had experienced unprecedented growth. This growth has slowed in the recent years, and if the growth of the economy continues to slow or if the economy contracts, our financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.

The rapid growth of the PRC economy had historically resulted in widespread growth opportunities in industries across China. This growth has slowed in the recent years. As a result of the global financial crisis and the inability of enterprises to gain comparable access to the same amounts of capital available in past years, there may be an adverse effect on the business climate and growth of private enterprise in the PRC. An economic slowdown could have an adverse effect on our sales and may increase our costs. Further, if economic growth continues to slow, and if, in conjunction, inflation is to proceed unchecked, our costs would likely to increase, and there can be no assurance that we would be able to increase our prices to an extent that would offset the increase in our expenses.

In addition, a tightening of the labor markets in our geographic region may result in fewer qualified applicants for job openings in our facilities. Further, higher wages, related labor costs and other increasing cost trends may negatively impact our results.

Uncertainties with respect to the Chinese legal system could have a material adverse effect on us and may restrict the level of legal protections to foreign investors

China's legal system is based on statutory law. Unlike the common law system, statutory law is based primarily on written statutes. Previous court decisions may be cited as persuasive authority but do not have a binding effect. Since 1979, the PRC government has been promulgating and amending the laws and regulations regarding economic matters, such as corporate organization and governance, foreign investment, commerce, taxation and trade. However, since these laws and regulations are relatively new, and the PRC legal system continues to rapidly evolve, the interpretation of many laws, regulations and rules is not always uniform and enforcement of these laws, regulations and rules involves uncertainties, which may limit legal protections available to us.

In addition, any litigation in China may be protracted and may result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management's attention. The legal system in China cannot provide investors with the same level of protection as in the U.S. The Company is governed by laws and regulations generally applicable to local enterprises in China. Many of these laws and regulations were recently introduced and remain experimental in nature and subject to changes and refinements. Interpretation, implementation and enforcement of the existing laws and regulations can be uncertain and unpredictable and therefore may restrict the legal protections available to foreign investors.

You may experience difficulties in effecting service of legal process, enforcing foreign judgments or bringing original actions based on United States or foreign laws against us, our management or the experts named in the prospectus.

We conduct substantially all of our operations in China and almost all of our assets are located in China. In addition, almost all of our senior executive officers reside in China. As a result, it may not be possible to effect service of process on our senior executive officers within the United States or elsewhere outside China, including with respect to matters arising under U.S. federal securities laws or applicable state securities laws. Moreover, our PRC counsel has advised us that the PRC does not have treaties with the United States or many other countries providing for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of court orders and final judgments.

Governmental control of currency conversion may affect the value of your investment.

In the course of providing services for international shipments, we occasionally require currencies from other countries to conduct our business. While we believe that we have complied with applicable currency control laws and regulations in all material aspects, we cannot guarantee you that our efforts will be free from challenge or that, if challenged, we will be successful in our defense of our current practices. Under our current corporate structure, our income is paid in different currencies, depending on our agreements with individual customers. We then pay in local currencies the expenses associated with operating a company in several countries. Shortages in the availability of foreign currency may restrict our ability to pay such expenses unless and until we convert currencies that we have into those that we require.

One of the currencies we often convert among is the RMB. The PRC government imposes controls on the convertibility of the RMB into foreign currencies and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of China. Under existing PRC foreign exchange regulations, payments of current account items, including profit distributions, interest payments and expenditures from trade-related transactions, can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval from the PRC State Administration of Foreign Exchange by complying with certain procedural requirements. However, approval from appropriate government authorities is required where RMB is to be converted into foreign currency and remitted out of China to pay capital expenses such as the repayment of bank loans denominated in foreign currencies. The PRC government may also at its discretion restrict access in the future to foreign currencies for current account transactions. If the foreign exchange control system prevents us from obtaining sufficient foreign currency to satisfy our currency demands, we may not be able to pay dividends, if any, in foreign currencies to our shareholders.

Changes in Currency Conversion Policies in China may have a material adverse effect on us.

Renminbi (“RMB”) is still not a freely exchangeable currency. Since 1998, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange of China has promulgated a series of circulars and rules in order to enhance verification of foreign exchange payments under a Chinese entity's current account items, and has imposed strict requirements on borrowing and repayments of foreign exchange debts from and to foreign creditors under the capital account items and on the creation of foreign security in favor of foreign creditors.

This may complicate foreign exchange payments to foreign creditors under the current account items and thus may affect the ability to borrow under international commercial loans, the creation of foreign security, and the borrowing of RMB under guarantees in foreign currencies. Moreover, the value of RMB may become subject to supply and demand, which could be largely impacted by international economic and political environments. Any fluctuations in the exchange rate of RMB could have an adverse effect on the operational and financial condition of the Company and its subsidiaries in China.

Fluctuation in the value of the RMB may have a material adverse effect on your investment.

The change in value of the RMB against the U.S. dollar, the Euro and other currencies may fluctuate and is affected by, changes in China’s political and economic conditions, among other things. On July 21, 2005, the PRC government changed its decade-old policy of pegging the value of the RMB to the U.S. dollar. Under the new policy, the RMB is permitted to fluctuate within a narrow and managed band against a basket of certain foreign currencies. This change in policy has resulted in an appreciation of the RMB against the U.S. dollar. While the international reaction to the RMB revaluation has generally been positive, there remains significant international pressure on the PRC government to adopt an even more flexible currency policy, which could result in a further and more significant appreciation of the RMB against the U.S. dollar. As a portion of our costs and expenses is denominated in RMB, the revaluation in July 2005 and potential future revaluation has and could further increase our costs. In addition, any significant revaluation of the RMB may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. For example, starting from the second half year of 2015, RMB started to depreciate vs. U.S. dollars and the trend continued in the beginning of year 2016, which cause our assets depreciated accordingly while we translated our balance sheet from RMB into U.S. Dollars. And the whole year revenue and net income was also negatively impacted by RMB depreciation.

Changes in China’s political and economic policies could harm our business.

China’s economy has historically been a planned economy subject to governmental plans and quotas and has, in certain aspects, been transitioning to a more market-oriented economy. Although we believe that the economic reform and the macroeconomic measures adopted by the Chinese government have had a positive effect on the economic development of China, we cannot predict the future direction of these economic reforms or the effects these measures may have on our business, financial position or results of operations. In addition, the Chinese economy differs from the economies of most countries belonging to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, or OECD. These differences include:

As a result of these differences, our business may not develop in the same way or at the same rate as might be expected if the Chinese economy were similar to those of the OECD member countries.

Since 1979, the Chinese government has promulgated many new laws and regulations covering general economic matters. Despite this activity to develop a legal system, China’s system of laws is not yet complete. Even where adequate law exists in China, enforcement of existing laws or contracts based on existing law may be uncertain or sporadic, and it may be difficult to obtain swift and equitable enforcement or to obtain enforcement of a judgment by a court of another jurisdiction. The relative inexperience of China’s judiciary, in many cases, creates additional uncertainty as to the outcome of any litigation. In addition, interpretation of statutes and regulations may be subject to government policies reflecting domestic political changes. Our activities in China will also be subject to administration review and approval by various national and local agencies of China’s government. Because of the changes occurring in China’s legal and regulatory structure, we may not be able to secure the requisite governmental approval for our activities. Although we have obtained all required governmental approval to operate our business as currently conducted, to the extent we are unable to obtain or maintain required governmental approvals, the Chinese government may, in its sole discretion, prohibit us from conducting our business.”

The Chinese government could change its policies toward private enterprise or even nationalize or expropriate private enterprises, which could result in the total loss of our investment in that country.

Our business is subject to significant political and economic uncertainties and may be adversely affected by political, economic and social developments in China. Over the past several years, the Chinese government has pursued economic reform policies including the encouragement of private economic activity and greater economic decentralization. The Chinese government may not continue to pursue these policies or may significantly alter them to our detriment from time to time with little, if any, prior notice.

Changes in policies, laws and regulations or in their interpretation or the imposition of confiscatory taxation, restrictions on currency conversion, restrictions or prohibitions on dividend payments to shareholders, devaluations of currency or the nationalization or other expropriation of private enterprises could have a material adverse effect on our business. Nationalization or expropriation could even result in the total loss of our investment in China and in the total loss of your investment in us.

As some of our directors, officers and assets are outside the United States, it will be extremely difficult to acquire jurisdiction and enforce liabilities against us and our officers, directors and assets based in China.

Some of our directors and officers reside outside the United States. In addition, many of our assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible to effect service of process within the United States upon our directors or officers and our subsidiaries, or enforce against any of them court judgments obtained in United States courts, including judgments relating to United States federal securities laws. Furthermore, because the majority of our assets are located in China and PRC does not have treaties with the United States or many other countries providing for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgment of courts, it would also be extremely difficult to access those assets to satisfy an award entered against us in United States court.

Our international operations require us to comply with a number of U.S. regulations.

In addition to the Chinese laws and regulations with which we must comply, we must also comply with the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), which prohibits U.S. companies or their agents and employees from providing anything of value to a foreign official for the purposes of influencing any act or decision of these individuals in their official capacity to help obtain or retain business, direct business to any person or corporate entity or obtain any unfair advantage. Any failure by us to adopt appropriate compliance procedures and ensure that our employees and agents comply with the FCPA and applicable laws and regulations in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial penalties and/or restrictions in our ability to conduct business in certain foreign jurisdictions. The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Asset Control (“OFAC”) administers and enforces economic and trade sanctions against targeted foreign countries, entities and individuals based on U.S. foreign policy and national security goals. As a result, we are restricted from entering into transactions with certain targeted foreign countries, entities, and individuals except as permitted by OFAC, which could reduce our future growth.

Risks Related to the Common Stock

The market price for our securities may be subject to wide fluctuations.

The securities of a number of companies with substantial operations in China have experienced wide fluctuations in their stock price. Among the factors that could affect the price of our common stock are risk factors described in this section and other factors, including:

In addition, the securities markets have from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are not related to the operating performance of particular industries or companies. In addition, the market prices and trading volumes of companies listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market have been volatile. As a result, the trading price of our common stock is likely to be volatile and could fluctuate significantly in response to many factors, including the following, some of which are beyond our control:

Domestic and international stock markets often experience significant price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations, as well as general economic and political conditions unrelated to our performance, may adversely affect the price of our common stock.

We may need additional capital and may sell additional securities or other equity securities or incur indebtedness, which could result in additional dilution to our shareholders or increase our debt service obligations.

In the future, we may require additional cash resources due to changed business conditions or other future developments, including any investments or acquisitions we may decide to pursue. If our resources are insufficient to satisfy our cash requirements, we may seek to sell additional equity or debt securities or obtain a credit facility. The sale of additional equity securities or equity-linked debt securities could result in dilution to our shareholders. The incurrence of indebtedness would result in increased debt service obligations and could result in operating and financing covenants that would restrict our operations. We cannot assure you that financing will be available, if at all, in amounts or on terms acceptable to us.

Substantial future sales of our securities in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could cause the price of our securities to decline.

Additional sales of our securities in the public market or the perception that these sales could cause the market price of our securities to decline. In addition, we may grant or sell additional options, restricted shares or other share-based awards in the future under our share incentive plan to our management, employees and other persons, the settlement and sale of which may further dilute our shares and drive down the price of our securities.

If NASDAQ were to delist our securities from trading on its exchange, such action could limit investors’ ability to make transactions in our securities and subject us to additional trading restrictions.

Our common stock is currently listed on The NASDAQ Capital Market. We cannot assure you that our securities will meet the continued listing requirements be listed on NASDAQ in the future.

If NASDAQ delists our common stock from trading on its exchange, we could face significant material adverse consequences including:

If our shares of common stock become subject to the SEC’s penny stock rules, broker-dealers may experience difficulty in completing customer transactions and trading activity in our securities may be adversely affected.

If our common stock were removed from listing with the NASDAQ Capital Market, it may be subject to the so-called “penny stock” rules. The SEC has adopted regulations that define a “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price per share of less than $5.00, subject to certain exceptions, such as any securities listed on a national securities exchange. For any transaction involving a “penny stock,” unless exempt, the rules impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers, subject to certain exceptions. If our common stock were delisted and determined to be a “penny stock,” a broker-dealer may find it more difficult to trade our common stock and an investor may find it more difficult to acquire or dispose of our common stock on the secondary market. Investors in penny stocks should be prepared for the possibility that they may lose their whole investment.

Our business is subject to changing regulations related to corporate governance and public disclosure that have increased both our costs and the risk of noncompliance.

Because our common stock is publicly traded, we are subject to certain rules and regulations of federal, state and financial market exchange entities charged with the protection of investors and the oversight of companies whose securities are publicly traded. These entities, including the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the SEC and NASDAQ, have issued requirements and regulations and continue to develop additional regulations and requirements in response to corporate scandals and laws enacted by Congress. Our efforts to comply with these regulations have resulted in, and are likely to continue resulting in, increased general and administrative expenses and diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. Because new and modified laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations in many cases due to their lack of specificity, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This evolution may result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and additional costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to our disclosure and governance practices.

Risks Relating to Ownership of Our Securities

Mr. Lei Cao, our CEO and Chairman of our Board of Directors is the beneficial owner of a substantial portion of our outstanding common stock, which may enable Mr. Cao to exert significant influence on corporate actions.

Mr. Cao has 20% of our outstanding shares of common stock as of September 8, 2016, which could have a substantial impact on matters requiring the vote of our shareholders, including the election of our directors and most corporate actions. This control could delay, defer or prevent others from initiating a potential merger, takeover or other change in our control, even if these actions would benefit our other shareholders and the Company. This control could adversely affect the voting and other rights of our other shareholders and could depress the market price of our common stock.

The limitation of monetary liability against our directors, officers and employees under Virginia law and the existence of statutory indemnification rights of our directors, officers and employees may result in substantial expenditures by our Company and may discourage lawsuits against our directors, officers and employees.

Our articles of incorporation do not contain any specific provisions that limit the liability of our directors for monetary damages to our Company and shareholders; however, we are prepared to indemnify our directors and officers to the extent provided for by Virginia law. We may also have included contractual indemnification obligations in our employment agreements with our officers. The foregoing indemnification obligations could result in the Company incurring substantial expenditures to cover the cost of settlement or damage awards against its directors and officers, which we may be unable to recoup. These provisions and resultant costs may also discourage our Company from bringing a lawsuit against directors and officers for breaches of their fiduciary duties, and may similarly discourage the filing of derivative litigation by our shareholders against our directors and officers even though such actions, if successful, might otherwise benefit our Company and shareholders.

The Company does not have any unresolved or outstanding Staff Comments.

We currently rent five facilities in the PRC, Hong Kong and the United States. Our PRC headquarter is in Beijing, and our US headquarter is in New York.

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time and may harm our business. However, we are currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

This item is not applicable to the Company.

PART II

Market for Our Common Stock

Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol SINO. The high and low common stock sales prices per share during the periods indicated were as follows:

Approximate Number of Holders of Our Common Stock

As of September 8, 2016 there are 25 holders of record of our common stock. This number does not include shareholders who hold their shares of common stock in street name.

Dividend Policy

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We anticipate that we will retain any earnings to support operations and to finance the growth and development of our business. Therefore, we do not expect to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination relating to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on a number of factors, including future earnings, capital requirements, financial conditions and future prospects and other factors the Board of Directors may deem relevant. Payments of dividends by Trans Pacific to our company are subject to restrictions including primarily the restriction that foreign invested enterprises may only buy, sell and/or remit foreign currencies at those banks authorized to conduct foreign exchange business after providing valid commercial documents.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

On December 9, 2015, the Company entered into a consulting and advisory services agreement with a consulting firm. The agreement is for a period of 12 months, effective on November 20, 2015. In return for the services, as approved by the Company’s Board of Directors, 250,000 shares at $1.02 per share of the Company’s common stock were issued to the consulting firm for the first six-months of service. On May 23, 2016, the Company issued the other 250,000 shares of common stock to this consultant at $0.72 per share for the services for the second six months to November 19, 2016. The shares of common stock were issued pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

On October 13, 2015, we announced that our board of directors had authorized the repurchase of up to $100,000 worth of our common stock in open market transactions or in privately negotiated transactions. The repurchase program shall terminate on the earlier of (a) the date that is twelve months after October 20, 2015, or (b) upon the termination notice from the Company or the broker that is engaged for the repurchase. The following table sets forth information regarding shares of our common stock that we repurchased during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2016:

In summary, the Company had repurchased a total of 50,306 common shares at an average stock price of $0.89 per share as of June 30, 2016.

Other Information

Effective February 11, 2016, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) granted an aggregate of 660,000 shares of stock to its directors and officers under the Company’s 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”), as below: (i) 300,000 shares to Mr. Lei Cao, Chief Executive Officer; (ii) 180,000 shares to Mr. Zhikang Huang, Chief Operating Officer; (iii) 40,000 shares to Ms. Tuo Pan, Acting Chief Financial Officer; (iv) 20,000 shares to Mr. Yafei Li, Chief Technology Officer; and (v) 40,000 shares to each of Tieliang Liu, Ming Zhu, and Jing Wang, each an independent director (collectively, the “Plan Stock Grants”). All the stock vests immediately.

In addition, the Compensation Committee authorized the grant of a total of $300,000 worth of share awards under the 2014 Plan and/or the 2008 Equity Stock Incentive Plan for each fiscal year going forward to its directors and executive officers in the same proportion as they were granted for the fiscal year 2016, as set forth above as long as such a director or executive officer is in his position and fulfills his duty.

Pursuant to the Company's 2014 Stock Incentive Plan, on July 26, 2016, the Company granted options to purchase an aggregate of 150,000 shares of common stock to two employees with a two-year vesting period, one half of which shall vest on October 26, 2016, and the other half shall vest on July 26, 2017. The exercise price of such options was $1.10 per share. Please refer to Item 12 for the table on Equity Compensation Plan Information, which is incorporated by reference herein.

The Company is not required to provide the information required by this Item because the Company is a smaller reporting company.

The following discussion and analysis of our company’s financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in the Annual Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results and the timing of selected events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors.

Overview

Sino-Global Shipping America, Ltd. (“Sino”), a Virginia corporation, which was founded in the US in 2001. Sino is a non-asset based global shipping and freight logistic integrated solution provider. Sino provides tailored solutions and value added services to its customers to drive effectiveness and control in related aspects throughout the entire shipping and freight logistic chain. Our current service offerings consist of shipping agency services and inland transportation management services .We temporarily suspended our ship management services from the fiscal year 2016 primarily due to market condition changes. We also temporarily suspended our shipping and chartering services primarily as a result of the termination of the vessel acquisition in December 2015.

The Company conducts its business primarily through its wholly-owned subsidiaries in the U.S., China, Hong Kong, Australia and Canada. Currently, a significant portion of our business is generated from the clients located in the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”).

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in U.S. Dollars and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).

 The following table presents summary information by segment for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:

Revenues

(1) Revenues from Shipping Agency and Ship Management Services

l Shipping Agency Services

For the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, our revenue generated from the shipping agency segment was $2,507,800 and $5,995,565, respectively. The decline in revenues was mainly due to the decrease in the total number of ships the Company served from 125 ships for the year ended June 30, 2015 to only 19 ships for the year ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in the number of ships served for the year ended June 30, 2016 was largely due to the general economy slow-down, the rising labor costs in China and intense competition in the industry, with established and new competitors offering rates that in many cases are lower than we can offer. On the other hand, the rising labor costs and increased overhead costs also reduced our profitability in this business line. However, Sino-Global still provides the shipping agency service, and we expect the number of ships we serve would be increase once the market conditions of shipping industry turns positive.

l Ship Management Services

We did not generate any revenue from the ship management service segment for the year ended June 30, 2016 as compared to the revenue of $190,088 for the year ended June 30, 2015. In connection with our acquisition of Longhe Ship Management (Hong Kong) Co. Limited in 2014, we launched ship management services in 2014 but considering the market conditions, risk control and the future development of ship management services, and our costs and profitability of this business segment, the management decided to temporarily suspend the ship management business from the beginning of fiscal year 2016.

(2) Revenues from Shipping and Chartering Services

In connection with the termination of the acquisition of Rong Yao International Shipping Limited (“Rong Yao”) on December 7, 2015, the Company realigned its developing strategy and temporarily suspended the shipping and chartering services. As a result, we reported $462,218 and $349,125 revenue from this segment for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

(3) Revenues from Inland Transportation Management Services

In September 2013, the Company executed an inland transportation management service contract with Zhiyuan Investment Group (“Zhiyuan”) whereby the Company provides certain solutions to help Zhiyuan control potential commodities loss during the transportation process. The Company started to provide inland transportation management services to a third-party customer, Tengda Northwest Ferroalloy Co., Ltd. (“Tengda Northwest”), following the quarter ended September 2014. As a result, for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the inland transportation management services generated revenues of $4,340,522 and $4,785,850, respectively, and gross profit of $2,990,152 and $4,030,247, respectively. The decrease was largely due to the slowing economy in China resulting in decreased shipping demand.

Operating Costs and Expenses

 The following tables set forth the components of the Company’s costs and expenses for the periods indicated.

Costs of Revenues

The cost of revenue was $3,737,989 for the year ended June 30, 2016 as compared to $5,936,283 for the year ended June 30, 2015. The overall cost of revenues as a percentage of our revenues decreased from 52.4% for year ended June 30, 2015 to 51.1% for the year ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in the overall cost of revenue in percentage term for the year ended June 30, 2016 was mainly because the majority of our revenue during the fiscal year 2016 came from more profitable inland transportation business lines rather than from less profitable shipping agency service segment. As the revenue from shipping agency services has been decreased, the inland transportation service was considered as our essential revenue source.

General and Administrative Expenses

Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits, office rent, office expenses, regulatory filing and listing fees, amortization of stock-based compensation expenses, legal, accounting and other professional service fees. For the year ended June 30, 2016, we had $4,346,159 of general and administrative expenses as compared to $4,304,329 for the year ended 2015, an increase of $41,830 or 1%. The increase in our general and administrative expense was mainly due to the increased allowance for doubtful accounts as the management decided to allocate a higher percent of allowance reservation on certain account receivables , increased stock-based compensation expense, as well as the increased professional service fees. However, the increase was partially offset by the decrease in travelling expenses and office expenses. As a percentage of revenue, our general and administrative expenses increased from 38.0% to 59.5% of the revenues for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2016, respectively. This increase was largely due to our reduced revenue in fiscal year 2016 as compared to that of fiscal year 2015.

Selling Expenses

The selling expenses consist primarily of business development costs and commissions for our operating staff to the ports at which we provide services. For the year ended June 30, 2016, we had $475,619 of selling expenses as compared to $63,219 for the year ended June 30, 2015, an increase of $412,400 or 652.3%. As a percentage of revenue, our selling expenses increased from 0.6% to 6.5% for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2016, respectively. During the year ended June 30, 2016, we made more efforts on business development to explore new business opportunities while maintaining our current customer relationship. On the other hand, the rising labor costs also increased our overall selling expense as compared to fiscal year 2015.

Critical Accounting Policies

We prepare the consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”). These accounting principles require us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions on the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the end of each fiscal period, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during each fiscal period. We continually evaluate these judgments and estimates based on our own historical experience, knowledge and assessment of current business and other conditions, our expectations regarding the future based on available information and assumptions that we believe to be reasonable.

There have been no other material changes during the year ended June 30, 2016 in our significant accounting policies to those previously disclosed in the Company’s June 30, 2015 annual report.

The selection of critical accounting policies, the judgments and other uncertainties affecting application of those policies and the sensitivity of reported results to changes in conditions and assumptions are factors that should be considered when reviewing our financial statements. We believe the following accounting policies involve the most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

Basis of Consolidation

The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the parent and its subsidiaries. All inter-company transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation. Sino-Global Shipping Agency Ltd. (“Sino-China”) is considered to be a Variable Interest Entity (VIE) and we are the primary beneficiary. Because of the contractual arrangements, the Company had a pecuniary interest in Sino-China that requires consolidation of our and Sino-China’s financial statements. The accounts of Sino-China are consolidated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements pursuant to Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 810-10, “Consolidation”. As a VIE, Sino-China’s revenues are included in our total revenues, its net loss from operations is consolidated with our net income (loss) before non-controlling interest. Our non-controlling interest in its net loss is then subtracted in calculating the net income attributable to the Company. The Company temporarily suspended its business with Sino-China in June 2014, therefore, there is no net income generated by Sino-China in the present.

Accounts Receivable and Advances

Accounts receivable are recognized at net realizable value. The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the failure of customers to make required payments in the relevant time period. Management reviews the accounts receivable on a periodic basis and record general and specific allowances when there is doubt as to the collectability of individual balances. In evaluating the collectability of individual receivable balances, we consider many factors, including the age of the balance, the customer’s historical payment history, its current credit-worthiness and current economic trends. Receivables are considered past due after 365 days. Accounts are written off against the allowance only after exhaustive collection efforts.

Translation of Foreign Currency

The accounts of our company and Sino-China are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (the “functional currency”). Our functional currency is the U.S. dollar, while Trans Pacific and Sino-China report their financial position and results of operations in Renminbi. The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars. Foreign currency transactions are translated into U.S. dollars using the fixed exchange rates in effect at the time of the transaction. Generally foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations. We translate foreign currency financial statements of Sino-China, Trans Pacific, Sino-Global HK and Sino-Global AUS in accordance with ASC 830-10, “Foreign Currency Matters”. Assets and liabilities are translated at current exchange rates quoted by the People’s Bank of China at the balance sheet dates and revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates in effect during the periods.

Taxation

The Company follows the provisions of ASC 740-10, “Accounting for Income Taxes”, which addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under ASC 740-10, the Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position would be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. ASC 740-10 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.

The implementation of ASC 740-10 resulted in no material liability for unrecognized tax benefits and no material change to the beginning retained earnings of the Company. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. We use the liability method of accounting for income taxes in accordance with US GAAP. Deferred taxes, if any, are recognized for the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements. We may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position would be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.

2017 Trends

China’s economy is declining due to the growing foreign debt, declining factory activity and devaluation in foreign exchange reserves, which has prolonged negative impact on the shipping industry. Although we expect China’s economy will have a soft landing, the difficult macroeconomic conditions in fiscal year 2016 will likely continue into fiscal year 2017. On the other hand, recent US economic data paints a picture of an economy in strong recovery mode and consumer spending is likely to receive a positive bounce from low energy prices. The economy outlook has led us to believe we must continue to diversify our service platform; reduce our dependency on businesses generated from China; and develop US-based complementary shipping logistics services to create a new driver to stimulate the development for our business. Furthermore, in the age of “Internet Plus”, we believe information and communication technologies can be adopted to traditional industries to meet the current challenges of supply and demand. We will continue to foster strong relationships with our strategic partners and draw upon our technical ability and in-depth industry knowledge to develop innovative value-added logistic solutions for our customers in the fiscal year 2017.

Results of Operations

Year Ended June 30, 2016 Compared to Year Ended June 30, 2015

Revenues. Total revenues decreased by $4,010,088 or 35.4% from $11,320,628 for the year ended June 30, 2015 to $7,310,540 for the comparable period in 2016. The decrease was mainly due to the declined revenues generated from our shipping agency services segment due to the decreased number of ships served. In addition, due to termination of the vessel acquisition, revenue from our shipping and chartering service segment was also limited.

Total Operating Costs and Expenses. Total operating costs and expenses decreased by $1,744,064 or 16.9% from $10,303,831 for the year ended June 30, 2015 to $8,559,767 for the year ended June 30, 2016. This decrease was primarily due to the decrease in cost of revenues, partially offset by the increase in selling expenses, as discussed below.

Operating Income (Loss). The Company had an operating loss of $1,249,227 for the year ended June 30, 2016, compared to an operating income of $1,016,797 for fiscal year 2015. The operating loss was mainly due to the declined revenues generated from shipping agency services and the increased selling expenses as discussed above.

Financial Income (Expense), Net. The Company’s net financial expense was $247,530 for the year ended June 30, 2016, compared to net financial income of $14,200 for the year ended June 30, 2015. We have operations in the US, Canada, Australia, Hong Kong and China. Our financial expense for each reporting period mainly reflected the effect of depreciation/appreciation of foreign currencies in terms of USD.

Taxation. The income tax expense was $812,593 for the year ended June 30, 2016, compared to income tax expense of $427,221 for the year ended June 30, 2015. The increase in income tax expense was due to increased taxable income from our inland transportation management segment, in which we accrued 15% income tax expense based on China statutory income tax rate. On the other hand, due to the termination of the proposed vessel acquisition in December 2015, the Company reassessed the possibility of utilization of previously accrued deferred tax assets and provided 100% valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets of $280,600. As a result of the above, total income tax expense for the year ended June 30, 2016 was $812,593.

Net Income (Loss). As a result of the foregoing, the Company had net loss of $2,301,522 for the year ended June 30, 2016, compared to net income of $643,922 for the year ended June 30, 2015. After deduction of non-controlling interest, net loss attributable to Sino-Global was $1,965,929 for the year ended June 30, 2016, compared to net income of $717,390 for the year ended June 30, 2015. With comprehensive income (loss) from foreign currency translation, comprehensive loss attributable to the Company was $2,338,268 for the year ended June 30, 2016, compared to comprehensive income of $784,204 for the year ended June 30, 2015.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows and Working Capital

As of June 30, 2016, we had $1,385,994 in cash and cash equivalents. We had approximately 3.2% of our cash in banks located in New York, Los Angeles, Canada, Australia and Hong Kong and had approximately 96.8% of cash in banks located in China.

The following table sets forth a summary of our cash flows for the periods indicated:

The following table sets forth a summary of our working capital:

We finance our ongoing operating activities primarily by using funds from our operations. We routinely monitor current and expected operational requirements to evaluate the use of available funding sources. As reflected in the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements, the Company had a net loss for the year ended June 30, 2016. The Company terminated the vessel acquisition agreement in December 2015, which also reduced the Company’s revenue source from the shipping and chartering service segment in the future.

In assessing its liquidity, management monitors and analyzes the Company’s cash on-hand, its ability to generate sufficient revenue source in the future and its operating and capital expenditure commitments. The Company plans to fund continuing operations through identifying new prospective joint venture and strategic alliance opportunities for new revenue sources, and reducing costs to improve profitability and replenish working capital. Considering our existing working capital position and our ability to access other funding sources, management believes that the foregoing measures collectively will provide sufficient liquidity for the Company to meet its future liquidity and capital obligations.

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $121,048 for the year ended June 30, 2016, which included our operating loss of $2.30 million due to our decreased revenue in the shipping agency service segment and increased selling expenses. In addition, the advances to suppliers increased by $2.14 million because we prepaid freight fees of RMB 14.58 million (USD$2.2 million) based on our Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with Singapore Metals & Minerals Pte Ltd. (“the Buyer”) and Galasi Jernsih Sdn BHD (“the Seller”), the accounts receivable decreased by $0.62 million because we strengthened our cash collection efforts and received payment of RMB 13.4 million (USD$2.0 million) from Tengda Northwest, our major third-party customer of inland transportation services, and due from related parties decreased by $1.16 million because we collected RMB22.2 million (USD$3.3 million) from our related party customer, Zhiyuan. The Company’s cash outflows from operating activities for the year ended June 30, 2016 reflected the above mentioned factors.

Net cash used in operating activities was $1,798,098 for the year ended June 30, 2015, which included our net income of $0.64 million, offset by an increase in accounts receivable of $2.63 million because we provided inland transportation services to customer and has not collected the amount as of June 30, 2015 and an increase in due from related parties of $724,425. Our cash outflows from the operating activities for the year ended June 30, 2015 reflected the above factors.

Investing Activities

Net cash provided by investing activities was $294,376 compared to $593,929 for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The amount was mainly generated by cash collection from the termination of the vessel acquisition of $326,035 during the year ended June 30, 2016, compared with the collection of a short-term loan from the related party Zhiyuan of $1,113,599 and installment payments related to the vessel acquisition of $516,229 during the year ended June 30, 2015.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $646,589 for the year ended June 30, 2016, of which $691,600 resulted from the proceeds from the issuance of common stock to Mr. Weixiong Yang in a private sale transaction on July 10, 2015. During the year ended June 30, 2016, the Company repurchased 50,306 common shares and recorded as treasury stock, with a payment of $45,011. Net cash provided by financing activities was $967,820 for the year ended June 30, 2015, due to the net proceeds from the issuance of 647,000 shares of common stock in July 2014.

Company Structure

We conduct our operations primarily through our subsidiaries, Trans Pacific Beijing, Sino-Global Shipping LA and Sino-Global Shipping Hong Kong. As a result, our ability to pay dividends and to finance any debt we may incur depends upon dividends paid by our subsidiaries and management fees paid by Sino-China. If our subsidiaries incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing their debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends to us. In addition, Trans Pacific is permitted to pay dividends to us only out of its retained earnings, if any, as determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. Under PRC law, wholly foreign-owned enterprises like Trans Pacific are required to set aside at least 10% of their after-tax profit each year to fund a statutory reserve until the amount of the reserve reaches 50% of such entity’s registered capital.

To the extent Trans Pacific does not generate sufficient after-tax profits to fund this statutory reserve, its ability to pay dividends to us may be limited. Although these statutory reserves can be used, among other ways, to increase the registered capital and eliminate future losses in excess of retained earnings of the respective companies, these reserve funds are not distributable as cash dividends except in the event of a solvent liquidation of the companies. Other than as described in the previous sentences, China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange (“SAFE”) has approved the company structure between the Company and Trans Pacific, and Trans Pacific is permitted to pay dividends to our company.

Off-Balance Sheet Commitments and Arrangements

We have not entered into any financial guarantees or other commitments to guarantee the payment obligations of any third parties. We have not entered into any derivative contracts that are indexed to our shares and classified as shareholders’ equity or that are not reflected in our condensed consolidated financial statements. Furthermore, we do not have any retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity that serve as credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity. We do not have any variable interest in any unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit support to us or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with us.

Not applicable.

The Company’s financial statements and the related notes, together with the report of Friedman LLP, are set forth following the signature pages of this report.

None.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As of June 30, 2016, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including our Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer concluded that our Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) were effective in timely alerting them to information required to be included in the Company’s periodic SEC filings.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the three months ended June 30, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2016. In making this assessment, management used the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “2013 COSO Framework”). The 2013 COSO Framework outlines the 17 underlying principles and the following fundamental components of a company’s internal control:(i) control environment, (ii) risk assessment, (iii) control activities, (iv) information and communication, and (v) monitoring. Based on this assessment, the Company’s management believes that, as of June 30, 2016, its internal control over financing reporting is effective based on those criteria.

The Company is not required to have its internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2016 audited by its auditors because it is a smaller reporting company.

None.

PART III

Regulation S-K Item 401

Lei Cao

Chief Executive Officer and Director

Age - 52

Director since 2001

Mr. Cao is our Chief Executive Officer and a Director. Mr. Cao founded our company in 2001 and has been the Chief Executive Officer since that time. Mr. Cao has been Chief Executive officer of our company since its formation. Prior to founding our company, Mr. Cao was a Chief Representative of Wagenborg-Lagenduk Scheepvaart BV, Holland, from 1992 - 1993, Director of the Penavico-Beijing’s shipping agency from 1987 through 1992, and a seaman for Cosco-Hong Kong from 1984 through 1987. Mr. Cao received his EMBA degree in 2009 from Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Mr. Cao was chosen as a director because he is the founder of our company and we believe his knowledge of our company and years of experience in our industry give him the ability to guide our company as a director.

Jing Wang

Independent Director

Age - 68

Director since 2007

Mr. Wang currently serves as Chief Economist to China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. and has held this position since December 2002. Mr. Wang was a Chinese Project Advisor for the World Bank from 1990 until 1994. From 1998 through 2000, Mr. Wang was the vice director of Tianjin Security and Futures Supervision Office, in charge of initial public offerings and listing companies. Mr. Wang is an independent director for Tianjin Binhai Energy & Development Co. Ltd., (Shenzhen Stock Exchange: 000695); Tianjin Marine Shipping Co., Ltd. (Shanghai Stock Exchange: 600751), and ReneSola Company (London Stock Exchange: SOLA). Mr. Wang received a Bachelor degree in Economics from Tianjin University of Finance and Economics. The Board believe that Mr. Wang’s economics background and experience working with public companies qualify him to serve a director of the Company.

Tieliang Liu

Independent Director

Age - 56

Director since 2013

Dr. Liu currently serves as the vice president in charge of accounting and finance to China Sun-Trust Group Ltd. and has held this position since 2001. Dr. Liu was a financial controller for Huaxing Group Ltd from 1998 to 2001. From 1996 through 1998, he was the chief accountant of China Enterprise Consulting Co., Ltd. Before working in industry, Dr. Liu taught accounting and finance in a university for more than ten years and has published tens of books and articles. Dr. Liu is a CPA in China. He received a PhD, master and bachelor degrees from Tianjin University of Finance and Economics. Dr. Liu has been chosen to serve as a director because of his accounting and business knowledge and experience in working with small and medium-sized companies.

Ming Zhu

Independent Director

Age - 57

Director since 2014

Mr. Zhu has been an international business consultant with RMCC Investment LLC, a Richmond, Virginia based consulting firm, since 1994. Mr. Zhu holds a master’s degree in tourism and business from Virginia Commonwealth University. Mr. Zhu has also served as an independent director at eFuture Information Technology Inc. since 2007 and as an independent director of Tri-Tech Holding, Inc. since 2012. Mr. Zhu was chosen as a director because of his experience with public companies and knowledge of our company.

Zhikang Huang

Chief Operating Officer and Director

Age - 39

Mr. Huang has been our Chief Operating Officer since 2010. Prior to 2010, he served as Director of Sino-Global Shipping Australia, for which he was responsible for regional operations, marketing and regulation oversight. From 2006 through 2010, Mr. Huang served as our Company’s Vice President, with duties focused on company operation and strategy, international shipping and marketing. From 2004 through 2006, Mr. Huang served as our Company’s Operations Manager, and from 2002 through 2004, he served as an operator with our Company. Mr. Huang obtained his degree in English from Guangxi University in 1999.

Tuo Pan

Acting Chief Financial Officer

Age – 31

Ms. Pan is our Acting Chief Financial Officer and a seasoned Certified Public Accountant licensed in Australia. Since 2008, Ms. Pan has overseen the finance and accounting functions of Sino-Global Shipping Australia Pty Ltd. Ms. Pan received her bachelor’s degree in Accounting and Finance and a master’s degree in Advance Accounting from the Curtin University of Technology in Western Australia. From August 2007 to July 2008, Ms. Pan worked as an auditor and project manager of Baker Tilly China Ltd., and participated in various projects from e-Future Information Technology Inc, TMC Education Corporation Ltd, China Ministry of Commerce, etc.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To the best of our knowledge, none of our directors or executive officers has been convicted in a criminal proceeding, excluding traffic violations or similar misdemeanors, or has been a party to any judicial or administrative proceeding during the past ten years that resulted in a judgment, decree or final order enjoining the person from future violations of, or prohibiting activities subject to, federal or state securities laws, or a finding of any violation of federal or state securities or commodities laws, any laws respecting financial institutions or insurance companies, any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud in connection with any business entity or been subject to any disciplinary sanctions or orders imposed by a stock, commodities or derivatives exchange or other self-regulatory organization, except for matters that were dismissed without sanction or settlement. None of our directors, director nominees or executive officers has been involved in any transactions with us or any of our directors, executive officers, affiliates or associates which are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.

Board Leadership Structure

Mr. Lei Cao currently holds both the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. These two positions have not been consolidated into one position; Mr. Cao simply holds both positions at this time. The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Cao’s service as both Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Mr. Cao possesses detailed and in-depth knowledge of the issues, opportunities and challenges facing the Company and its business and is thus best positioned to develop agendas that ensure that the Board’s time and attention are focused on the most critical matters. His combined role enables decisive leadership, ensures clear accountability, and enhances the Company’s ability to communicate its message and strategy clearly and consistently to the Company’s shareholders, employees, customers and suppliers.

We do not have a lead independent director because of the foregoing reasons and also because we believe our independent directors are encouraged to freely voice their opinions on a relatively small company board. We believe this leadership structure is appropriate because we are a smaller reporting company as such we deem it appropriate to be able to benefit from the guidance of Mr. Cao as both our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board.

Risk Oversight

Our Board of Directors plays a significant role in our risk oversight. The Board of Directors makes all relevant Company decisions. As such, it is important for us to have our Chief Executive Officer serve on the Board as he plays a key role in the risk oversight of the Company. As a smaller reporting company with a small board of directors, we believe it is appropriate to have the involvement and input of all of our directors in risk oversight matters.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance (Regulation S-K Item 405)

Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished to the Company under 17 CFR 240.16a-3(e) during its most recent fiscal year and Forms 5 and amendments thereto furnished to the Company with respect to its most recent fiscal year, and any written representation referred to in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the Company is not aware of any director, officer, beneficial owner of more than ten percent of any class of equity securities of the Company registered pursuant to Section 12 that failed to file on a timely basis, as disclosed in the above Forms, reports required by Section 16(a) during the most recent fiscal year or prior years.

Regulation S-K Item 406

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics and has filed a copy of the Code of Ethics with the Commission.

Regulation S-K Item 407(c)(3)

None.

Regulation S-K Item 407(d)(4) and (5)

The Company has an audit committee, consisting solely of the Company’s independent directors, Tieliang Liu, Jing Wang and Ming Zhu. Mr. Liu qualifies as the audit committee financial expert.  The Company’s audit committee charter is available on the Company’s website (www.sino-global.com) or directly at the following link:  http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/irol/22/221375/corpgov/AuditCommCharte09272008.pdf.

The following table shows the annual compensation paid by us to Mr. Lei Cao, our Principal Executive Officer, Mrs. Tuo Pan, our Acting Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Anthony S. Chan, our former Executive Vice President and Acting Chief Financial Officer and Mr. Zhikang Huang, our Chief Operating Officer, for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. No other officer had total compensation during either of the previous two years of more than $100,000.

Summary Compensation Table

(1) Ms. Pan was appointed as our Acting Chief Financial Officer on October 15, 2015.

(2) Effective October 15, 2015, Mr. Anthony S. Chan resigned as our Acting Chief Financial Officer.

Outstanding Equity Awards of Named Executive Officers at Fiscal Year-End

As of June 30, 2016, we had three named executive officers, Mr. Lei Cao, our Chief Executive Officer, Ms. Tuo Pan, our Acting Chief Financial Officer, and Mr. Zhikang Huang, our Chief Operating Officer.

Option Awards ⁽¹⁾

Director Compensation ⁽¹⁾

Employment Agreements with the Company’s Named Executive Officers

Sino-China has employment agreements with each of Mr. Lei Cao, Ms. Tuo Pan and Mr. Zhikang Huang. These employment agreements provide for one-year terms that extend automatically in the absence of termination provided at least 60 days prior to the anniversary date of the agreement. If we fail to provide this notice or if we wish to terminate an employment agreement in the absence of cause, then we are obligated to provide at least 30 days’ prior notice. In such case during the initial term of the agreement, we would need to pay such executive (a) in the absence of a change of control, one-time the then applicable annual salary of such executive or (b) in the event of a change of control, one-and-a-half times the then applicable annual salary of such executive. In the event of termination due to death or disability, the payment is equal to two times the executive’s salary.

We are, however, permitted to terminate an employee for cause without penalty to our company, where the employee has committed a crime or the employee’s actions or inactions have resulted in a material adverse effect to us.

The below table reflects, as of June 30, 2016, the number of shares of common stock authorized by our shareholders to be issued (directly or by way of issuance of securities exercisable for or convertible into) as incentive compensation to our officers, directors, employees and consultants.

The below table reflects the ownership of our common stock by officers, directors and holders of more than five percent of our common stock. Percentages are based on 8,330,841 shares issued and outstanding as of September 8, 2016.

*             Less than 1%.

The Board of Directors maintains a majority of independent directors who are deemed to be independent under the definition of independence provided by NASDAQ Stock Market Rule 4200(a)(15).  Other than as described herein, no transactions required to be disclosed under Item 404 of Regulation S-K have occurred since the beginning of the Company’s last fiscal year.

On June 27, 2013, we signed a 5-year global logistic service agreement with TEWOO Chemical & Light Industry Zhiyuan Trade Co., Ltd and TianJin Zhi Yuan Investment Group Co., Ltd (together “Zhiyuan”). Zhiyuan is owned by Mr. Zhang, the largest shareholder of the Company. For the year ended June 30, 2013, we had no business transaction with Zhiyuan. Before Mr. Zhang was a shareholder of the Company, he agreed with the Company to cause Zhiyuan to procure certain services from the Company. The 5-year global logistic service agreement details the nature of such cooperation between Zhiyuan and the Company. Thus, while Mr. Zhang’s initial agreement to direct business to the company was made when he was not a related party, the subsequent agreement was entered after he was a related party. During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, the Company executed a shipping and chartering services agreement with Zhiyuan whereby it assisted in the transportation of approximately 51,000 tons of chromite ore from South Africa to China. In September 2013, the Company executed an inland transportation management service contract with Zhiyuan whereby it would provide certain advisory services and help control its potential commodities loss during the transportation process. In addition, the Company executed a one-year short-term loan agreement with Zhiyuan, effective January 1, 2014, to facilitate the working capital needs of Zhiyuan on an as-needed basis. In September 2014, the Company collected approximately $2.7 million from the Zhiyuan Investment Group, representing full repayment of the short-term loan and payment of approximately $1.6 million of outstanding trade receivable. In October 2014, the Company collected approximately $384,000 from the Zhiyuan Investment Group to reduce the outstanding trade receivable. For the year ended June 30, 2015 and 2016, the Company continued to provide inland transportation management services to the Zhiyuan Investment Group. The net amount due from the Zhiyuan Investment Group at June 30, 2015 and 2016 were $2,609,831 and $1,622,519. As the date of this report, the Company has collected approx. $350,000 from the Zhiyuan Investment Group to reduce the outstanding trade receivables.

As of June 30, 2015 and 2016, the Company is owed $174,759 and $0 respectively, from Sino-G Trading Inc. (“Sino-G”), an entity that is owned by the brother-in-law of the Company’s CEO. Sino-G previously served as a funds transfer agent for the Company’s services in Tianjin, PRC. The Company fully collected the outstanding receivable from Sino-G before June 30, 2016.

Friedman LLP was appointed by the Company to serve as its independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2015. Audit services provided by Friedman LLP for fiscal 2015 included the examination of the consolidated financial statements of the Company; and services related to periodic filings made with the SEC. In addition, Friedman LLP provided review services relating to the Company’s quarterly reports.

Audit Fees

During fiscal 2016 and 2015, Friedman LLP’s fees for the annual audit of our financial statements and the quarterly reviews of the financial statements included in periodic reports were $190,000 and $190,000, respectively.

Audit-Related Fees

None.

Tax Fees

Tax fees related to tax return preparation amounted to $23,690 and $19,570 during fiscal year 2016 and 2015, respectively.

All Other Fees

None.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies

Before Friedman LLP was engaged by the Company to render audit or non-audit services, the engagement was approved by the Company’s audit committee. All services rendered by Friedman LLP have been so approved.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Company caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SINO-GLOBAL SHIPPING AMERICA, LTD. AND AFFILIATES

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Sino-Global Shipping America, Ltd.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sino-Global Shipping America, Ltd. and Affiliates (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), cash flows and changes in equity for each of the years in the two-year period ended June 30, 2016. The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended June 30, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Friedman LLP

New York, New York

September 19, 2016

SINO-GLOBAL SHIPPING AMERICA, LTD. AND AFFILIATES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

SINO-GLOBAL SHIPPING AMERICA, LTD. AND AFFILIATES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

SINO-GLOBAL SHIPPING AMERICA LTD. AND AFFILIATE

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

SINO-GLOBAL SHIPPING AMERICA, LTD. AND AFFILIATES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2016 AND 2015