Sino Agro Food, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2011 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
OR
¨
|
TRANSACTION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from ___________________________ to ___________________________
Commission file number: 000-54191
SINO AGRO FOOD, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Nevada
|
33-1219070
|
(State of Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
Room 3711, China Shine Plaza
No. 9 Lin He Xi Road
Tianhe County, Guangzhou City, P.R.C.
|
510610
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
(860) 20 22057860
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
N/A
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, If Changed Since Last Report)
Copies to:
The Sourlis Law Firm
Joseph M. Patricola, Esq.
The Courts of Red Bank
130 Maple Avenue, Suite 9B2
Red Bank, New Jersey 07701
Direct: (732) 618-2843
Office: (732) 530-9007
Fax: (732) 530-9008
JoePatricola@SourlisLaw.com
www.SourlisLaw.com
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes ¨ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” "non-accelerated filer" and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer
|
o
|
Accelerated filer
|
o
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
o
|
Smaller reporting company
|
x
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
As of August 16, 2011, there were 62,894,262 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
|
||
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
3 | |
Item 1.
|
Financial Statements
|
3 |
Item 2.
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Plan of Operations
|
38 |
Item 3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
55 |
Item 4T.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
55 |
55 | ||
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
|
55 | |
Item 1.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
55 |
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors
|
55 |
Item 2.
|
Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
56 |
Item 3.
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
56 |
Item 4.
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
56 |
Item 5.
|
Other Information
|
56 |
Item 6.
|
Exhibits
|
57 |
SIGNATURES
|
58 |
2
SINO AGRO FOOD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011
3
SINO AGRO FOOD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
PAGE
|
|
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
5
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
6
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
7
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
8
|
4
SINO AGRO FOOD, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
June 30,
2011
|
December 31,
2010
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Audited)
|
|||||||
$ | $ | |||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current assets
|
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
856,395 | 3,890,026 | ||||||
Inventories
|
1,865,460 | 8,913,127 | ||||||
Deposits and prepaid expenses
|
7,674,273 | 14,229,711 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
|
12,815,904 | 12,803,771 | ||||||
Other receivables
|
49,446,326 | 3,967,680 | ||||||
Total current assets
|
72,658,358 | 43,804,315 | ||||||
Property and equipment
|
||||||||
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
|
2,516,146 | 17,155,782 | ||||||
Construction in progress
|
2,724,699 | 2,231,475 | ||||||
Land use rights, net of accumulated amortization
|
19,287,002 | 16,829,410 | ||||||
Total property and equipment
|
24,527,847 | 36,216,667 | ||||||
Other assets
|
||||||||
Goodwill
|
724,940 | 12,000,000 | ||||||
Proprietary technologies, net of accumulated amortization
|
7,128,294 | 7,287,883 | ||||||
Unconsolidated equity investees
|
1,256,555 | - | ||||||
Long term accounts receivable
|
7,524,244 | 8,459,044 | ||||||
License rights
|
1 | 1 | ||||||
Total other assets
|
16,634,034 | 27,746,928 | ||||||
Total assets
|
113,820,239 | 107,767,910 | ||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current liabilities
|
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
411,345 | 390,846 | ||||||
Billings on uncompleted contracts in excess of costs and estimated earnings
|
1,684,804 | - | ||||||
Due to a director
|
74,080 | 926,196 | ||||||
Dividends payable
|
206,356 | 210,262 | ||||||
Other payables
|
3,304,472 | 1,412,290 | ||||||
Total current liabilities
|
5,681,057 | 2,939,594 | ||||||
Other liabilities
|
||||||||
Long term debt
|
- | 3,776,435 | ||||||
Total liabilities
|
5,681,057 | 6,716,029 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies
|
- | - | ||||||
Stockholders' equity
|
||||||||
Preferred stock: $0.001 par value
|
- | - | ||||||
(10,000,000 shares authorized, 0 share issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively)
|
||||||||
Series A preferred stock: $0.001 par value
|
- | - | ||||||
(100 shares authorized, 100 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively)
|
||||||||
Series B convertible preferred stock: $0.001 par value)
|
7,000 | 7,000 | ||||||
(10,000,000 shares authorized, 7,000,000 shares issued and outstanding) as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively)
|
||||||||
Common stock: $0.001 par value
|
58,076 | 55,474 | ||||||
(100,000,000 shares authorized, 57,076,136 and 55,474,136 shares issued and oustanding as of June 30 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively)
|
||||||||
Additional paid - in capital
|
61,940,035 | 58,586,362 | ||||||
Retained earnings ($1,250,000 restricted for cost of treasury stock held)
|
39,146,312 | 25,019,971 | ||||||
Less: Treasury stock (Cost of 1,000,000 and 0 treasury shares held as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively)
|
(1,250,000 | ) | - | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
2,809,436 | 3,804,116 | ||||||
Total Sino Agro Food, Inc. and subsidiaries stockholders' equity
|
102,710,859 | 87,472,923 | ||||||
Non - controlling interest
|
5,428,323 | 13,578,958 | ||||||
Total stockholders' equity
|
108,139,182 | 101,051,881 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
113,820,239 | 107,767,910 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
5
SINO AGRO FOOD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Three months
|
Three months
|
Six months
|
Six months
|
|||||||||||||
ended
|
ended
|
ended
|
ended
|
|||||||||||||
June 30, 2011
|
June 30, 2010
|
June 30, 2011
|
June 30, 2010
|
|||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||
Continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Revenue
|
6,705,370 | 395,531 | 9,826,901 | 695,531 | ||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold
|
2,881,648 | - | 4,072,263 | - | ||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
3,823,722 | 395,531 | 5,754,638 | 695,531 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses
|
(544,094 | ) | (928,376 | ) | (1,234,240 | ) | (1,442,712 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) from operations
|
3,279,628 | (532,845 | ) | 4,520,398 | (747,181 | ) | ||||||||||
Other income (expenses)
|
||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
9,314 | - | 18,616 | - | ||||||||||||
Gain (loss) of extinguishment of debts
|
489,500 | (1,586,000 | ) | 582,426 | (6,151,180 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest expense
|
(4,300 | ) | (1,934 | ) | (7,472 | ) | (4,861 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (expenses)
|
494,514 | (1,587,934 | ) | 593,570 | (6,156,041 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income before income taxes
|
3,774,142 | (2,120,779 | ) | 5,113,968 | (6,903,222 | ) | ||||||||||
Provision for income taxes
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
3,774,142 | (2,120,779 | ) | 5,113,968 | (6,903,222 | ) | ||||||||||
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to the non - controlling interest
|
(762,664 | ) | 10,529 | (1,191,577 | ) | 21,176 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to the Sino Agro Food, Inc. and subsidiaries
|
3,011,478 | (2,110,250 | ) | 3,922,391 | (6,882,046 | ) | ||||||||||
Discontinued operations
|
||||||||||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations
|
- | 2,295,263 | 19,941,880 | 3,817,507 | ||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to the non - controlling interest
|
- |
(504,936
|
) |
(9,737,929
|
) |
(700,986
|
) | |||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations attributable to the Sino Agro Food, Inc. and subsidiaries
|
- | 1,790,327 | 10,203,951 | 3,116,521 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to the Sino Agro Food, Inc. and subsidiaries
|
3,011,478 | (319,923 | ) | 14,126,342 | (3,765,525 | ) | ||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)
|
1,676,536 | 364,014 | 2,852,210 | 700,850 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
4,688,014 | 44,091 | 16,978,552 | (3,064,675 | ) | |||||||||||
Less: other comprehensive (income) loss attributable to the non - controlling interest
|
(101,798 | ) | (80,131 | ) | (395,716 | ) | (160,141 | ) | ||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the Sino Agro Food, Inc. and subsidiaries
|
4,586,216 | (36,040 | ) | 16,582,836 | (3,224,816 | ) | ||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to Sino Agro Food, Inc. and subsidiaries common stockholders:
|
||||||||||||||||
From continuing and discontinued operations
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 0.05 | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.25 | $ | (0.07 | ) | ||||||
Diluted
|
$ | 0.05 | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.22 | $ | (0.07 | ) | ||||||
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to Sino Agro Food, Inc. and subsidiaries common stockholders:
|
||||||||||||||||
From continuing operations
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 0.05 | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.07 | $ | (0.13 | ) | ||||||
Diluted
|
$ | 0.05 | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.06 | $ | (0.13 | ) | ||||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
57,420,993 | 51,942,636 | 57,272,885 | 52,943,579 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
|
64,620,993 | 54,128,579 | 64,272,885 | 52,943,579 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
6
SINO AGRO FOOD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six months ended
|
Six months ended
|
|||||||
June 30, 2011
|
June 30, 2010
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
$ | $ | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities
|
||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
5,113,968 | (6,903,222 | ) | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) from continuing operations to net cash from operations:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
|
85,756 | 310,564 | ||||||
Amortization
|
306,738 | 44,890 | ||||||
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debts
|
(582,426 | ) | 6,151,180 | |||||
Common stock issued for services
|
- | 497,059 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Increase in inventories
|
(448,127 | ) | (160,608 | ) | ||||
Decrease(increase) in deposits and prepaid expenses
|
(2,318,847 | ) | 894,116 | |||||
Increase in due from directors
|
- | 111,392 | ||||||
(Decrease) increase in due to a director
|
(584,594 | ) | 2,181,490 | |||||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
42,908 | (7,332 | ) | |||||
Increase (decrease) in other payables
|
13,059,501 | (396,202 | ) | |||||
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable
|
(5,122,059 | ) | 349,645 | |||||
Increase in billings on uncompleted contracts in excess of costs and estimated earnings
|
1,684,804 | - | ||||||
Increase in other receivables
|
(3,269,215 | ) | (790,037 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
7,968,407 | 2,282,935 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities
|
||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment
|
(6,828 | ) | (1,002,665 | ) | ||||
Investment in unconsolidated equity investees
|
(1,256,555 | ) | (600,533 | ) | ||||
Acquisition of land use rights
|
(4,102,453 | ) | (59,252 | ) | ||||
Payment for construction in progress
|
(493,223 | ) | (371,405 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(5,859,059 | ) | (2,033,855 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities
|
||||||||
Dividends paid
|
(3,905 | ) | - | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(3,905 | ) | - | |||||
Net cash provided by continuing operations
|
2,105,443 | 249,080 | ||||||
Cash flows from discontinued operations
|
||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
- | 5,898,160 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(3,137,885 | ) | (4,693,689 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities
|
- | (3,154,338 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in discontinued operations
|
(3,137,885 | ) | (1,949,867 | ) | ||||
Effects on exchange rate changes on cash
|
(2,001,189 | ) | 532,545 | |||||
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(3,033,631 | ) | (1,168,242 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
3,890,026 | 2,360,587 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
856,395 | 1,192,345 | ||||||
Less: cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period - discontinued operation
|
- | (565,461 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period - continuing operations
|
856,395 | 626,884 | ||||||
Supplementary disclosures of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash paid for interest
|
7,472 | 4,861 | ||||||
Cash paid for income taxes
|
- | - | ||||||
Non - cash transactions
|
||||||||
Series B convertible preferred stock issued
|
- | 7,000 | ||||||
Common stock retired
|
- | (7,000 | ) | |||||
Series A preferred stock issued
|
- | - | ||||||
Common stock issued for settlement of debts
|
3,910,500 | 1,816,900 | ||||||
Disposal proceeds receivable from sale of subsidiaries, HYT and ZX
|
34,473,905 | - | ||||||
Land use rights payable due to related parties
|
22,411 | - | ||||||
Acquisition of treasury stock
|
1,250,000 | - |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
7
SINO AGRO FOOD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
|
CORPORATE INFORMATION
|
Sino Agro Food, Inc. (“the Company”) (formerly known as Volcanic Gold, Inc. and A Power Agro Agriculture Development, Inc.) Company”) is an International Business Corporation incorporated on October 1, 1974 in the State of Nevada, United States of America.
The Company was engaged in the mining and exploration business but ceased its mining and exploring business on October 14, 2005. On August 24, 2007, the Company entered into a Merger and Acquisition Agreement with Capital Award Inc. (“CA”) and its subsidiaries Capital Stage Inc. (“CS”) and Capital Hero Inc. (“CH”). Effective the same date, CA, a Belize Corporation, completed a reverse merger transaction with SIAF. SIAF acquired all the outstanding common stock of CA from Capital Adventure, a shareholder of CA for 32,000,000 shares of the company’s common stock.
On August 24, 2007 the Company changed its name from Volcanic Gold, Inc. to A Power Agro Agriculture Development, Inc. On December 8, 2007, the Company officially changed its name to Sino Agro Food, Inc.
On September 5, 2007, the Company acquired three existing businesses in the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”):
|
a)
|
Hang Yu Tai Investment Limited (“HYT”), a company incorporated in Macau, the owner of a 78% equity interest in ZhongXingNongMu Ltd (“ZX”), a company incorporated in the PRC;
|
|
b)
|
Tri-way Industries Limited (“TRW”), a company incorporated in Hong Kong;
|
|
c)
|
Macau Eiji Company Limited (“MEIJI”), a company incorporated in Macau, the owner of 75% equity interest in Enping City Juntang Town Hang Sing Tai Agriculture Co. Ltd. (“HST”), a PRC corporate Sino-Foreign joint venture. HST was disposed in 2010.
|
On November 27, 2007, MEIJI and HST established a corporate Sino - Foregin joint venture, Jiang Men City Heng Sheng Tai Agriculture Development Co. Ltd. (“JHST”), a company incorporated in the PRC with MEIJI owning a 75% interest and HST owning a 25% interest.
On November 26, 2008, SIAF established Pretty Mountain Holdings Limited. (“PMH”), a company incorporated in Hong Kong with a 80% equity interest. On May 25, 2009, PMH formed a corporate Sino-Foregin joint venture, Qinghai Sanjiang A Power Agriculture Co. Ltd (“SJAP”), incorporated in the People’s Republic of China of which PMH owns a 45% equity interest . The remaining 55% equity interest in SJAP is owned by the following entities:
|
•
|
Qinghai Province Sanjiang Group Company Limited (English translation) (“Qinghai Sanjiang”), a company owned by the PRC with major business activities in the agriculture industry; and
|
|
•
|
Guangzhou City Garwor Company Limited (English translation) (“Garwor”), a private limited company incorporated in the PRC, specializing in sales and marketing.
|
|
•
|
SJAP is engaged in the business of manufacturing bio-organic fertilizer, livestock feed and development of other agriculture projects in the County of Huangyuan, in the vicinity of the Xining City, Qinghai Province, PRC.
|
8
1.
|
CORPORATE INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
|
In September, 2009, the Company carried out an internal re-organization of its corporate structure and business, and formed a 100% owned subsidiary A Power Agro Agriculture Development (Macau) Limited (APWAM) which was formed in Macau. APWAM then acquired PMH’s 45 % equity interest in SJAP. By virtue of the Assignment, APWAM assumed all obligations and liabilities of PMH under the Sino Foreign Joint Venture Agreement. On September 9, 2010, application was made by the Company to the Companies Registry of Hong Kong for deregistration of PMH under Section 291AA of the Hong Kong Companies Ordinance. On January 28, 2011, PMH was dissolved.
On May 7, 2010, Qinghai Sanjiang sold and transferred its equity interest in SJAP to Garwor. The aforesaid sale and transfer was approved by the State Administration for Industry And Commerce of Xining City Government of the People’s Republic of China. As a result, SJAP was owned by APWAM with a 45% interest and Garwor with a 55% interest.
On February 15, 2011, the Company entered the agreement to sell its 78% equity interest in ZX for $31,000,000. On March 29, 2011, the Company entered memorandum of understanding to sell its 100% equity interest in HYT group (including HYT and ZX) for $45,000,000 and agreed to cancel the original agreement of sale ZX with the effective date of sale of subsidiaries is January 1, 2011.
The Company applied to form Enping City Bi Tao A Power Fishery Development Co. Limited (EBAPFD), Enping City Bi Tao A Power Prawn Culture Development Co. Limited (EBAPCD), and Enping City A Power Cattle Farm Co., Limited (ECF), all of which the Company would indirectly own 25% equity interest. The approvals of the formation of EBAPFD, EBA PCD, ECF by the relevant authorities of the PRC Government are pending.
The Company applied to form Linli United A Power Agriculture Co., Limited (LLA), of which the Company would directly own 24% and SJAP would own 51% equity interest. The approvals of the formation of LLA by the relevant authorities of the PRC Government are pending.
The Company’s principal executive office is located at Room 3711, China Shine Plaza, No. 9 Lin He Xi Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, PRC 510610.
The nature of the operations and principal activities of Sino Agro Food, Inc. and its subsidiaries are described in Note 2.2.
2.
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
2.1
|
FISCAL YEAR
|
The Company has adopted December 31 as its fiscal year end.
9
2.
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
|
|
a)
|
REPORTING ENTITY
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the following entities:
Name of subsidiaries
|
Place of incorporation
|
Percentage of interest
|
Principal activities
|
|||
Capital Award Inc. ("CA")
|
Belize
|
100% (12.31..2010: 100%) directly
|
Fishery development and holder of A-Power Technology master license.
|
|||
Capital Stage Inc. ("CS")
|
Belize
|
100% (12.31.2010: 100%) indirectly
|
Dormant
|
|||
Capital Hero Inc. ("CH")
|
Belize
|
100% (12.31.2010: 100%) indirectly
|
Dormant
|
|||
Tri-way Industries Limited ("TRW")
|
Hong Kong, PRC
|
100% (12.31.2010: 100%) directly
|
Investment holding, holder of enzyme technology master license for manufacturing of livestock feed and bio-organic fertilizer
|
|||
Pretty Mountain Holdings Limited ("PMH")
|
Hong Kong, PRC
|
0% (12.31.2010: 80%) directly
|
Dissolved on January 28, 2011
|
|||
Macau Eiji Company Limited ("MEIJI")
|
Macau, PRC
|
100% (12.31.2010: 100%) directly
|
Investment holding, technology consulting service
|
|||
Jiang Men City Heng Sheng Tai Agriculture Development Co. Ltd ("JHST")
|
PRC
|
75% (12.31.2010: 75%) directly
|
Hylocereus Undatus and Asparagus Plantation.
|
|||
Hang Yu Tai Investment Limited ("HYT")
|
Macau, PRC
|
0% (12.31.2010: 100%) directly
|
Disposed on February 15, 2011 (2010: Investment holding)
|
|||
ZhongXingNongMu Co. Ltd ("ZX")
|
PRC
|
0% (12.31.2010: 78%) indirectly
|
Disposed on February 15, 2011 (2010: Dairy production and manufacturing of organic fertilizer,livestock feed, and beef cattle and plantation of crops and pasture)
|
|||
A Power Agro Agriculture Development (Macau) Limited ("APWAM")
|
Macau, PRC
|
100% (12.31.2010: 100%) directly
|
Investment holding
|
|||
Name of variable interest entity
|
Place of incorporation
|
Percentage of interest
|
Principal activities
|
|||
Qinghai Sanjiang A Power Agriculture Co., Ltd ("SJAP")
|
PRC
|
45% (12.31.2010: 45%) indirectly
|
Manufacturing of organic fertilizer,livestock feed, and beef cattle and plantation of crops and pastures
|
|||
Name of unconsolidated equity investee
|
Place of incorporation
|
Percentage of interest
|
Principal activities
|
|||
Enping City Bi Tao A Power Prawn Culture Development Co., Limited (EBAPCD) (pending approval)
|
PRC
|
25% indirectly
|
Prawn cultivation
|
|||
Enping City Bi Tao A Power Fishery Development Co., Limited (EBAPFD) (pending approval)
|
PRC
|
25% indirectly
|
Fish cultivation
|
|||
Enping City A Power Cattle Farm Co., Limited (ECF) (pending approval)
|
PRC
|
25% indirectly
|
Beef cattle cultivation
|
|||
Linli United A Power Agriculture Co., Limited (LLA) (pending approval)
|
PRC
|
24% directly and 51% indirectly
|
Manufacturing of organic fertilizer,livestock feed, and beef cattle and sheep cultivation, and plantation of crops and pastures
|
10
2.
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
|
2.3
|
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
|
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("US GAAP").
Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The information included in this interim report should be read in conjunction with the information included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
2.4
|
BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION
|
The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of SIAF, its subsidiaries CA, CS, CH, TRW, MEIJI, HJST, ZX, PMH, HYT and APWAM and its variable interest entity SJAP. All material inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. HYT and ZX were derecognized as subsidiaries since 1 January 2011 and PMH was dissolved on January 28, 2011.
SIAF, CA, CS, CH, TRW, MEIJI, JHST, APWAM and SJAP are hereafter referred to as (“the Company”).
2.5
|
BUSINESS COMBINATION
|
The Company adopted the accounting pronouncements relating to business combination (primarily contained in ASC Topic 805 “Business Combinations”), including assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contingencies. These pronouncements established principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquisition as well as provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. In addition, these pronouncements eliminate the distinction between contractual and non-contractual contingencies, including the initial recognition and measurement criteria and require an acquirer to develop a systematic and rational basis for subsequently measuring and accounting for acquired contingencies depending on their nature. Our adoption of these pronouncements will have an impact on the manner in which we account for any future acquisitions.
2.6
|
NON - CONTROLLING INTEREST IN CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
The Company adopted the accounting pronouncement on non-controlling interests in consolidated financial statements, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This guidance is primarily contained in ASC Topic “Consolidation”. It clarifies that a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated financial statements. The adoption of this standard has not had material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
2.7
|
USE OF ESTIMATES
|
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make assumptions and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods covered thereby. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Judgments and estimates of uncertainties are required in applying the Company’s accounting policies in certain areas. The following are some of the areas requiring significant judgments and estimates: determinations of the useful lives of assets, estimates of allowances for doubtful accounts, cash flow and valuation assumptions in performing asset impairment tests of long-lived assets, estimates of the realizability of deferred tax assets and inventory reserves.
2.8
|
REVENUE RECOGNITION
|
The Company’s revenue recognition policies are in compliance with ASC Topic 605. Sales revenue is recognized when all of the following have occurred: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, (iii) the price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) the ability to collect is reasonably assured. These criteria are generally satisfied at the time of shipment when risk of loss and title passes to the customer. License fee income is recognized on the accrual basis in accordance with the underlying agreements.
11
|
Revenues from the Company's agriculture development services contract are performed under fixed-price contracts. Revenues under long-term contracts are accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 605, Revenue Recognition ("ASC 605"). Under the percentage-of-completion method, the Company estimates profit as the difference between total estimated revenue and total estimated cost of a contract and recognize that profit over the contract term. The percent of cost incurred determines the amount of revenue to be recognized. Payment terms are generally defined by the installation contract and as a result may not match the timing of the costs incurred by the Company and the related recognition of revenue. Such differences are recorded as either costs or estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts or billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts. The Company determines a customer’s credit worthiness at the time an order is accepted. Sudden and unexpected changes in a customer’s financial condition could put recoverability at risk.
|
The percentage of completion method requires the ability to estimate several factors, including the ability of the customer to meet its obligations under the contract, including the payment of amounts when due. If we determine that collectability is not assured, we will defer revenue recognition and use methods of accounting for the contract such as completed contract method until such time we determine that collectability is reasonably assured or through the completion of the project.
For fixed-price contracts, the Company uses the ratio of cost incurred to date on the contract (excluding uninstalled direct materials) to management's estimate of the contract's total cost, to determine the percentage of completion on each contract. This method is used as management considers expended costs to be the best available measure of progression of these contracts. Contract cost includes all direct material, subcontract and labor costs and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as supplies, tool repairs and depreciation. The Company accounts for maintenance and repair services under the guidance of ASC 605 as the services provided relate to construction work. Contract costs incurred to date and expected total contract costs are continuously monitored during the term of the contract. Changes in job performance, job conditions, job conditions, and estimated profitability arising from contract penalty, change orders and final contract settlements may result in revisions to the estimated profitability during the contract. These changes, which include contracts with estimated costs in excess of estimated revenues, are recognized in contract costs in the period in which the revisions are determined. Profit incentives are included in revenues when their realization is reasonably assured. At the point the Company anticipates a loss on a contract, the Company estimates the ultimate loss through completion and recognizes that loss in the period in which the possible loss was identified.
2.8
|
REVENUE RECOGNITION (CONTINUED)
|
The Company will not provide warranties to customers on a basis customary to the industry; however, the customers can claim warranty directly from product manufacturers. Historically, the Company has no warranty claims history in the past.
The Company’s agriculture development consultancy services revenue are recognized when the relevant services are rendered, and are subject to Chinese business tax at a rate of 0% of the gross agriculture development con tract service income approved by the Chinese local government.
2.9
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD
|
Cost of goods sold consists primarily of direct and indirect cost of cultivation of agriculture for sale and cost of development contract.
2.10
|
SHIPPING AND HANDLING
|
Shipping and handling costs related to cost of goods sold are included in general and administrative expenses which totaled $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
2.11
|
ADVERTISING
|
Advertising costs are included in general and administrative expenses which totaled $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
2.12
|
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
The reporting currency of the Company is the U.S. dollars. The functional currency of the Company is the Chinese Renminbi (RMB).
12
For those entities whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollars, all assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date; shareholders’ equity is translated at historical rates and items in the statements of income and of cash flows are translated at the average rate for the period. Because cash flows are translated based on the average translation rate, amounts related to assets and liabilities reported in the statements of cash flows will not necessarily agree with changes in the corresponding balances in the balance sheets. Translation adjustments resulting from this process are included in accumulated other comprehensive income in the statements of shareholders’ equity. Transaction gains and losses that arise from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency are included in the statements of income and comprehensive income as incurred.
Accumulated other comprehensive income in the consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity amounted to $1,234,698 as of June 30, 2011 and $3,804,116 as of December 31, 2010. The balance sheet amounts with the exception of equity as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were translated at RMB6.47 to $1.00 and RMB6.62 to $1.00, respectively. The average translation rates applied to the statements of income and comprehensive income and of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 were RMB6.51 to $1.00 and RMB6.81 to $1.00, respectively.
2.13
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
The Company considers all highly liquid securities with original maturities of three months or less when acquired to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents kept with financial institutions in People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) are not insured or otherwise protected. Should any of those institutions holding the Company’s cash become insolvent, or the Company is unable to withdraw funds for any reason, the Company could lose the cash on deposit on that institution.
2.14
|
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
|
The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses on accounts receivable. Management reviews the composition of accounts receivable and analyzes historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment patterns to evaluate the adequacy of these reserves. Reserves are recorded primarily on a specific identification basis.
The standard credit period of the Company’s most of client is three months. The collection period over 1 year is classified as long term accounts receivable. Management evaluates the collectability of the receivables at least quarterly. Provision for doubtful accounts as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are $0.
2.15
|
INVENTORIES
|
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (determined on a weighted average basis) and net realizable value.
Costs incurred in bringing each product to its location and conditions are accounted for as follows:
·
|
raw materials – purchase cost on a weighted average basis;
|
|
·
|
manufactured finished goods and work-in-progress – cost of direct materials and labor and a proportion of manufacturing overhead based on normal operation capacity but excluding borrowing costs; and
|
·
|
retail and wholesale merchandise finished goods – purchase cost on a weighted average basis.
|
Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale.
2.16
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
|
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses. Such costs include the cost of replacing parts that are eligible for capitalization when the cost of replacing the parts is incurred. Similarly, when each major inspection is performed, its cost is recognized in the carrying amount of the property and equipment as a replacement only if it is eligible for capitalization. The assets’ residual values, useful lives and depreciation methods are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each financial year-end.
Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets.
Milk cows
|
10 years
|
Plant and machinery
|
5 - 10 years
|
Structure and leasehold improvements
|
10 - 20 years
|
Mature seeds
|
20 years
|
Furniture and equipment
|
2.5 - 10 years
|
Motor vehicles
|
5 -10 years
|
13
2.16
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT (CONTINUED)
|
An item of property and equipment is removed from the accounts upon disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected to arise from the continued use of the asset. Any gain or loss arising on disposal of the asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the item) is included in the consolidated statements of income in the period the item is disposed.
2.17
|
GOODWILL
|
Goodwill is an asset representing the fair economic benefits arising from other assets acquired in a business combination that are not individually identified and separately recognized. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis at the end of the company’s fiscal year, or when impairment indicators arise. The Company uses a fair-value-based approach to test for impairment at the level of each reporting unit. The Company directly acquired MEIJI which is engaged in Hu Plantation. As a result of this acquisition, the Company recorded goodwill in the amount of $724,940. This goodwill represents the fair value of the assets acquired in these acquisitions over the cost of the assets acquired.
2.18
|
PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGIES
|
The Company has determined that technological feasibility is established at the time a working model of products is completed. A master license of stock feed manufacturing technology was acquired and the costs of acquisition are capitalized as proprietary technologies when technological feasibility has been established. Proprietary technologies are intangible assets of finite lives. Proprietary technologies are amortized using the straight line method over their estimated lives of 25 years. Management evaluates the recoverability of proprietary technologies on an annual basis of the end of the company’s fiscal year, or when impairment indicators arise. As required by ASC Topic 350 “Intangible – Goodwill and Other”, the Company uses a fair-value-based approach to test for impairment.
2.19
|
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
|
Construction in progress represents direct costs of construction as well as acquisition and design fees incurred. Capitalization of these costs ceases and the construction in progress is transferred to property and equipment when substantially all the activities necessary to prepare the assets for their intended use are completed. No depreciation is provided until construction is completed and the asset is ready for its intended use.
2.20
|
LAND USE RIGHTS
|
Land use rights represent acquisition of land use right rights of agriculture land from farmers and are amortized on the straight line basis over their respective lease periods. The lease period of agriculture land is in the range from 30 years to 60 years. Land use rights purchase prices were determined in accordance with the 2007 PRC Government’s minimum lease payments of agriculture land and mutually agreed between the company and the vendors.
2.21
|
VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITY
|
An entity (investee) in which the investor has obtained less than a majority-owned interest, according to the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). A variable interest entity (VIE) is subject to consolidation if A VIE is an entity meeting one of the following three criteria as elaborated in ASC Topic 810-10, Consolidation.
(a)
|
equity-at-risk is not sufficient to support the entity's activities
|
(b)
|
As a group, the equity-at-risk holders cannot control the entity; or
|
(c)
|
The economics do not coincide with the voting interest
|
14
If a firm is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, the holdings must be disclosed on the balance sheet. The primary beneficiary is defined as the person or company with the majority of variable interests
2.22
|
TREASURY STOCK
|
Treasury stock consists of a Company’s own stock which has been issued, subsequently reacquired by the Company , and not yet reissued or canceled. Treasury stock does not reduce the number of shares issued but does not reduce the number of shares outstanding, as well as total stockholders’ equity. These shares are not eligible to receive cash dividends. Treasury stock may be presented as an asset if adequately disclosed (ASC 505-30-30). Accounting for excesses and deficiencies on treasury stock transactions is governed by ASC 505-30-30.
State laws and federal agencies closely regulate transactions involving a company’s own capital stock, so the purchase of treasury shares must have a legitimate purpose. Some of the most common reasons for purchasing treasury shares are as follows:
(i)
|
to meet additional stock needs for various reasons, including newly implemented stock option plans, stock for convertible bonds or convertible preferred stock, or a stock dividend.
|
(ii)
|
to eliminate the ownerships interests of a stockholder.
|
(iii)
|
to increase the market price of the stock that returns capital to shareholders.
|
(iv)
|
to potentially increase earnings per share of the stock by decreasing the shares outstanding on the same earnings.
|
(v)
|
to make more shares available for a merger.
|
The cost method of accounting for treasury stock shares is adopted. The purchase of treasury stock is treated as a temporary reduction in shareholders equity in view of the expectation to reissue the shares instead of retiring them. When the Company reissues the treasury shares, the temporary account is eliminated. The cost of treasury stock shares reacquired is charged to a contra account, in this case a contra equity account that reduces the stockholder equity balance. The purchase of treasury shares leaves the common stock and contributed balances intact.
2.23
|
INCOME TAXES
|
The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of ASC Topic 740 "Accounting for Income Taxes". Under ASC Topic 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse.
The provision for income tax is based on the results for the year as adjusted for items, which are non-assessable or disallowed. It is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. Deferred tax is accounted for using the balance sheet liability method in respect of temporary differences arising from differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the corresponding tax basis used in the computation of assessable tax profit. In principle, deferred tax liabilities are recognized for all taxable temporary differences, and deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilized.
Deferred income taxes are calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period when the asset is realized or the liability is settled. Deferred tax is charged or credited in the income statement, except when it related to items credited or charged directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also dealt with in equity. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the Company intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.
ASC Topic 740 also prescribes a more-likely-than-not threshold for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken, or expected to be taken, in a tax return. ASC Topic 740 also provides guidance related to, among other things, classification, accounting for interest and penalties associated with tax positions, and disclosure requirements. Any interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits will be recorded in tax expense.
2.24
|
POLITICAL AND BUSINESS RISK
|
The Company's operations are carried out in the PRC. Accordingly, the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations may be influenced by the political, economic and legal environment in the PRC, and by the general state of the PRC's economy. The Company's operations in the PRC are subject to specific considerations and significant risks not typically associated with companies in North America and Western Europe. The Company's results may be adversely affected by changes in governmental policies with respect to laws and regulations, anti-inflationary measures, currency conversion and remittance abroad, and rates and methods of taxation, among other things.
15
2.25
|
CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
|
Cash includes cash at bank and demand deposits in accounts maintained with banks within the People’s Republic of China. Total cash in these banks on June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 amounted to $212,067 and $3,525,224, respectively of which no deposits are covered by insurance. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any risks on its cash in bank accounts.
Accounts receivable are derived from revenue earned from customers located primarily in the People’s Republic of China. The Company perform ongoing credit evaluations of customers and have not experienced any material losses to date.
The Company had 5 major customers whose revenue individually represented the following percentages of the Company’s total revenue:
Three months
ended
June 30, 2011
|
Three months
ended
June 30, 2010
|
Six months
ended
June 30, 2011
|
Six months
ended
June 30, 2010
|
|||||||||||||
Customer A
|
48.63 | % | - | 45.57 | % | - | ||||||||||
Customer B
|
11.50 | % | - | 13.26 | % | - | ||||||||||
Customer C
|
9.93 | % | - | 6.78 | % | - | ||||||||||
Customer D
|
8.50 | % | - | 10.26 | % | - | ||||||||||
Customer E
|
8.50 | % | - | 8.93 | % | - | ||||||||||
Customer F
|
- | 41.48 | % | - | 40.38 | % | ||||||||||
Customer G
|
- | 31.36 | % | - | 33.33 | % | ||||||||||
Customer H
|
- | 19.20 | % | - | 18.61 | % | ||||||||||
Customer I
|
- | 7.96 | % | - | 7.68 | % | ||||||||||
87.06 | % | 100.00 | % | 84.80 | % | 100.00 | % |
16
2.25
|
CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK (CONTINUED)
|
The company had 5 major customers whose accounts receivable balance individually represented of the Company’s total accounts receivable as follows:
June 30,
2011
|
December 31,
2010
|
|||||||
Customer A
|
21.96 | % | 52.13 | % | ||||
Customer B
|
15.04 | % | 32.14 | % | ||||
Customer C
|
12.09 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||
Customer D
|
7.52 | % | - | |||||
Customer E
|
6.32 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||
Customer F
|
- | 3.79 | % | |||||
Customer G
|
- | 3.59 | % | |||||
Customer H
|
- | 2.91 | % | |||||
62.93 | % | 94.56 | % |
2.26
|
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
In accordance with ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment”, long-lived assets to be held and used are analyzed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. The Company reviews the carrying amount of its long-lived assets, including intangibles, for impairment, each reporting period. An asset is considered impaired when estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset. In the event the carrying amount of such asset is considered not recoverable, the asset is adjusted to its fair value. Fair value is generally determined based on discounted future cash flow. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company determined no impairment charges were necessary.
2.27
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
As prescribed in ASC Topic 260 “Earnings per Share”, Basic Earnings per Share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common stock shares outstanding during the year. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common stock shares outstanding during the year plus potential dilutive instruments such as stock options and warrants. The effect of stock options on diluted EPS is determined through the application of the treasury stock method, whereby proceeds received by the Company based on assumed exercises are hypothetically used to repurchase the Company’s common stock at the average market price during the period.
For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, basic earnings (loss) per share from continuing and discontinued operations attributable to Sino Agro Food, Inc. and subsidiaries common stockholders amount to $0.05 and $(0.01), respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, basic earnings (loss) per share from continuing and discontinued operations attributable to Sino Agro Food, Inc. and subsidiaries common stockholders amount to $0.25 and $(0.07), respectively.
For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing and discontinued operations attributable to Sino Agro Food, Inc. and subsidiaries common stockholders amount to $0.05 and $(0.01), respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing and discontinued operations attributable to Sino Agro Food, Inc. and subsidiaries common stockholders amount to $0.22 and $(0.07), respectively.
For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,basic earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations attributable to Sino Agro Food, Inc. and subsidiaries common stockholders amount to $0.05 and $(0.04), respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, basic earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations attributable to Sino Agro Food, Inc. and subsidiaries common stockholders amount to $0.07 and $(0.13), respectively.
For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations attributable to Sino Agro Food, Inc. and subsidiaries common stockholders amount to $0.05 and $(0.04), respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations attributable to Sino Agro Food, Inc. and subsidiaries common stockholders amount to $0.06 and $(0.13), respectively.
2.28
|
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
ASC Topic 220 “Comprehensive Income” establishes standards for reporting and displaying comprehensive income and its components in financial statements. Comprehensive income is defined as the change in stockholders’ equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. The comprehensive income for all periods presented includes both the reported net income and net change in cumulative translation adjustments.
17
2.29
|
RETIREMENT BENEFIT COSTS
|
PRC state managed retirement benefit programs are defined contribution plans and the payments to the plans are charged as expenses when employees have rendered service entitling them to the contribution.
2.30
|
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
|
The Company adopts both ASC Topic 718, “Compensation - Stock Compensation” and ASC Topic 505-50,“Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees” using the fair value method. Under ASC Topic 718 and ASC Topic 505-50, stock compensation expenses is measured at the grant date on the value of the option or restricted stock and is recognized as expenses, less expected forfeitures, over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period.
2.30
|
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
|
The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:-
Level 1
|
Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
|
Level 2
|
Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
|
Level 3
|
Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.
|
The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.
The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or a non-recurring basis, consequently, the Company did not have any fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010, nor gains or losses are reported in the statements of income and comprehensive income that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities still held as of the reporting date for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2011 or June 30, 2010.
2.31
|
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
|
The Company does not expect any recent accounting pronouncements to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In January 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-01 Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash. The amendments in this Update clarify that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying Topics 505 and 260 (Equity and Earnings Per Share). The amendments in this update are effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December.
In January 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-02 regarding accounting and reporting for decreases in ownership of a subsidiary. Under this guidance, an entity is required to deconsolidate a subsidiary when the entity ceases to have a controlling financial interest in the subsidiary. Upon deconsolidation of a subsidiary, and entity recognizes a gain or loss on the transaction and measures any retained investment in the subsidiary at fair value. In contrast, an entity is required to account for a decrease in its ownership interest of a subsidiary that does not result in a change of control of the subsidiary as an equity transaction. This ASU clarifies the scope of the decrease in ownership provisions, and expands the disclosures about the deconsolidation of a subsidiary or de-recognition of a group of assets. This ASU is effective for beginning in the first interim or annual reporting period ending on or after December 31, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements In January 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-02 – Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary – a Scope Clarification. The amendments in this Update affect accounting and reporting by an entity that experiences a decrease in ownership in a subsidiary that is a business or nonprofit activity. The amendments also affect accounting and reporting by an entity that exchanges a group of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity for an equity interest in another entity. The amendments in this update are effective beginning in the period that an entity adopts SFAS No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – An Amendment of ARB No. 51.” If an entity has previously adopted SFAS No. 160 as of the date the amendments in this update are included in the Accounting Standards Codification, the amendments in this update are effective beginning in the first interim or annual reporting period ending on or after December 15, 2009. The amendments in this update should be applied retrospectively to the first period that an entity adopted SFAS No. 160. The Company adopted this standard and has determined the standard does not have material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
18
2.31
|
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
In January 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06 – Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that requires new disclosure as follows: 1) Transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2. A reporting entity should disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. 2) Activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. In the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements (that is, on a gross basis rather than as one net number). This update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that clarify existing disclosures as follows: 1) Level of disaggregation. A reporting entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities. A class is often a subset of assets or liabilities within a line item in the statement of financial position. A reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities. 2) Disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. A reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. Those disclosures are required for fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3.The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU, however, the Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-09, “Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements,” or ASU 2010-09. ASU 2010-09 primarily rescinds the requirement that, for listed companies, financial statements clearly disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. Subsequent events must still be evaluated through the date of financial statement issuance; however, the disclosure requirement has been removed to avoid conflicts with other SEC guidelines. ASU 2010-09 was effective immediately upon issuance and was adopted in February 2010.
In April 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-13,"Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades," or ASU 2010-13. ASU 2010-13 provides amendments to Topic 718 to clarify that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in currency of a market in which a substantial porting of the entity's equity securities trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-17 to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update 2010-17, "Revenue Recognition-Milestone Method (Topic 605): Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition" or ASU 2010-17. This Update provides guidance on the recognition of revenue under the milestone method, which allows a vendor to adopt an accounting policy to recognize all of the arrangement consideration that is contingent on the achievement of a substantive milestone (milestone consideration) in the period the milestone is achieved. The pronouncement is effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-17 does not have any significant impacts on the consolidated financial statements.
19
2.31
|
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, “Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.” This update amends codification topic 310 on receivables to improve the disclosures that an entity provides about the credit quality of its financing receivables and the related allowance for credit losses. As a result of these amendments, an entity is required to disaggregate by portfolio segment or class certain existing disclosures and provide certain new disclosures about its financing receivables and related allowance for credit losses. This guidance is being phased in, with the new disclosure requirements for period end balances effective as of December 31, 2010, and the new disclosure requirements for activity during the reporting period are effective March 31, 2011. The troubled debt restructuring disclosures in this ASU have been delayed by ASU 2011-01 “Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20,” which was issued in January 2011.
In December 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-28 which amend “Intangibles- Goodwill and Other” (Topic 350). The ASU modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting entities, they are required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. An entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing guidance in Topic 350, which requires that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances changes that would more likely than not reduce the faire value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. ASU 2010-28 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU; however, the Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-29 which address diversity in practice about the interpretation of the pro forma revenue and earnings disclosure requirements for business combinations (Topic 805). This ASU specifies that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. This ASU also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures under Topic 805 to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. ASU 2010-29 is effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU and expected the adoption of this ASU will have an impact on its future business combinations.
20
3.
|
SEGMENT INFORMATION
|
The Company establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments on a basis consistent with the Company’s internal organization structure as well as business segments and major customers in financial statements. The Company operates in four principal reportable segments: Fishery Development Division, HU Plantation Division, Organic Fertilizer and Bread Grass Division , Cattle Farm Development Division and discontinued Dairy Production Division since January 1, 2011.
For the three months ended June 30, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations
|
Discontinued operations
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fishery Development Division |
HU
Plantation Division
|
Organic
Fertilizer and Bread Grass Division
|
Cattle Farm Development Division
|
Corporate and others
|
Dairy
Production
Division
|
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue
|
2,555,474 | 1,222,241 | 1,973,078 | 954,577 | - | - | 6,705,370 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
1,544,892 | 573,224 | 467,664 | 273,391 | 152,307 | - | 3,011,478 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
22,301,691 | 23,546,271 | 9,011,260 | 13,631,721 | 45,329,296 | - | 113,820,239 |
For the three months ended June 30, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations
|
Discontinued operations
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fishery
Development Division
|
HU Plantation Division
|
Organic
Fertilizer and Bread Grass Division
|
Cattle Farm Development Division
|
Corporate and others
|
Dairy Production
Division
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue
|
395,531 | - | - | - | - | 4,575,735 | 4,971,266 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
381,678 | (31,401 | ) | - | - | (2,460,425 | ) | 1,790,225 | (319,923 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
14,675,437 | 11,522,288 | - | - | 20,857,441 | 39,508,665 | 86,563,831 |
21
3. SEGMENT INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
Discontinued operations
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fishery Development Division
|
HU
Plantation
Division
|
Organic
Fertilizer and Bread Grass Division
|
Cattle Farm Development Division
|
Corporate
and others
|
Dairy Production
Division
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue
|
4,115,219 | 1,222,241 | 3,534,864 | 954,577 | - | - | 9,826,901 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
2,465,690 | 553,425 | 823,345 | 273,358 | (193,427 | ) | 10,203,951 | 14,126,342 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
22,301,691 | 23,546,271 | 9,011,260 | 13,631,721 | 45,329,296 | - | 113,820,239 |
For the six months ended June 30, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
Discontinued operations
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fishery Development Division
|
HU Plantation Division
|
Organic
Fertilizer and Bread Grass Division
|
Cattle Farm Development Division
|
Corporate and others
|
Dairy Production
Division
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue
|
695,531 | - | - | - | - | 8,687,057 | 9,382,588 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
668,174 | (63,528 | ) | - | - | (6,855,484 | ) | 2,485,313 | (3,765,525 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
14,675,437 | 11,522,288 | - | - | 20,857,441 | 39,508,665 | 86,563,831 |
22
4. INCOME TAXES
United States of America
SIAF was incorporated in the United States of America. SIAF has no trading operations in United States of America and no US corporate tax has been provided in the financial statements of SIAF.
China
Beginning January 1, 2008, the new Enterprise Income Tax (“EIT”) law replaced the existing laws for Domestic Enterprises (“DEs”) and Foreign Invested Enterprises (“FIEs”). The new standard EIT rate of 25% replaced the 33% rate currently applicable to both DEs and FIEs. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the new EIT will have on its financial condition. Beginning January 1, 2008, China unified the corporate income tax rule on foreign invested enterprises and domestic enterprises. The unified corporate income tax rate is 25%.
Under new tax legislation of China beginning January 2008, the agriculture, dairy and fishery sectors are exempted from enterprise income taxes.
No EIT has been provided in the financial statements of CA, ZX, JHST and SJAP since they are exempted from EIT for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 as they are within the agriculture, dairy and fishery sectors and ZX had been disrecognized as a subsidiary since January 1, 2011.
Belize and Malaysia
CA, CS and CH are international business companies incorporated in Belize, and are exempted from corporation tax of Belize.
All sales invoices of CA were issued by its representative office in Malaysia and its trading and service activities are conducted in China. As the Malaysia tax law imposed on a territorial basis and not on a worldwide basis, CA’s income is not subject to Malaysia corporation tax.
No Belize and Malaysia corporation tax have been provided in the financial statements of CA for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
Hong Kong
No Hong Kong profits tax has been provided in the financial statements of PMH and TRW, since they did not earn any assessable profits for the for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and PHM was dissolved on January 28, 2011.
Macau
No Macau Corporation tax has been provided in the financial statements of HYT, APWAM and MEIJI since they did not earn any assessable profits for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and HYT had been disrecognized as a subsidiary since January 1, 2011.
23
5.
|
NET INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
|
On February 15, 2011 and on March 29, 2011, the Company entered the agreement and memorandum of understanding, respectively to sell 100% equity interest in HYT group (including HYT and ZX) to Mr. Xin Ming Sun, a director of ZhongXingNong Nu Co., Ltd for $45,000,000 with the effective date of the sale of subsidiaries being January 1, 2011. HYT group contributed revenue and net income from the Dairy Production Division. Prior to sale of HYT group, the Dairy Production Division represented a separate business segment. The disposal group has been treated as discontinued operation in this quarterly financial report. The post-tax result of the Dairy Production Division has been disclosed as a discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.
Six months ended
|
Six months ended
|
|||||||||
Note
|
June 30, 2011
|
June 30, 2010
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||||
$
|
$
|
|||||||||
Revenue
|
- | 8,687,057 | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold
|
- | 3,877,011 | ||||||||
Gross profit
|
- | 4,810,046 | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses
|
- | (756,713 | ) | |||||||
Net income from operations
|
- | 4,053,333 | ||||||||
Interest expense
|
- | (235,826 | ) | |||||||
Net income before income taxes
|
- | 3,817,507 | ||||||||
Net income from sale of subsidiaries
|
(a)
|
10,203,951 | - | |||||||
Net income before income taxes
|
10,203,951 | 3,817,507 | ||||||||
Provision for income taxes
|
- | - | ||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations
|
10,203,951 | 3,817,507 | ||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to the non - controlling interest
|
- | (700,986 | ) | |||||||
Net income from discontinued operations attributable to the Sino Agro Food, Inc. and subsidiaries
|
10,203,951 | 3,116,521 |
24
5.
|
NET INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
|
(a)
|
Net gain on sale of subsidiaries, HYT and ZX
|
Six months ended
|
||||||||||
Note
|
June 30, 2011
|
|||||||||
$
|
$
|
|||||||||
Consideration received and receivable
|
(b)
|
45,000,000 | ||||||||
Net assets of HYT and ZX group as of December 31, 2010 disposed
|
(c)
|
47,985,152 | ||||||||
Less: Non controlling interest of ZX as of December 31, 2010
|
(9,737,929 | ) | ||||||||
38,247,223 | ||||||||||
6,752,777 | ||||||||||
Cumulative exchange gain in respect of net assets of subsidiares
|
||||||||||
reclassified from other comprehensive income to net gain on
|
||||||||||
sale of subsidiaries
|
3,451,174 | |||||||||
Net gain on sale of subsidiaries, HYT and ZX
|
10,203,951 |
Sale proceeds of HYT and ZX were not subject to business tax of PRC and income tax of PRC and Macau.
(b)
|
Consideration received
|
Six months ended
|
||||
June 30, 2011
|
||||
$
|
||||
Consideration received in cash and cash equivalents
|
10,526,095 | |||
Disposal proceeds receivable from sale of subsidiaries
|
34,473,905 | |||
Total consideration proceeds
|
45,000,000 |
25
6.
|
NET INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
|
(c)
|
Analysis of consolidated assets and liabilities of subsidiaries, HYT and ZX as of December 31, 2010
|
December 31,
2010 |
||||
$
|
||||
ASSETS
|
||||
Current assets
|
||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
3,137,885 | |||
Inventories
|
7,495,794 | |||
Deposits and prepaid expenses
|
8,874,285 | |||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
|
6,044,666 | |||
Other receivables
|
2,069,514 | |||
Total current assets
|
27,622,144 | |||
Property and equipment
|
||||
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
|
14,612,953 | |||
Goodwill
|
11,275,060 | |||
Land use rights, net of accumulated amortization
|
9,441,158 | |||
Total property and equipment
|
35,329,171 | |||
Total assets
|
62,951,315 | |||
Less: LIABILITIES
|
||||
Current liabilities
|
||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
22,409 | |||
Other payables
|
11,167,319 | |||
Total current liabilities
|
11,189,728 | |||
Other liabilities
|
||||
Long term debt
|
3,776,435 | |||
Total liabilities
|
14,966,163 | |||
Net assets of subsidiaries, HYT and ZX as of December 31, 2010 disposed of
|
47,985,152 |
26
6.
|
NET INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
|
(d)
|
Net cash outflow on sale of subsidiaries, HYT and ZX
|
Six months ended
|
||||
June 30, 2011
|
||||
$
|
||||
Less: cash and cash equivalents balance disposed of
|
(3,137,885 | ) | ||
Net cash outflow on sale of subsidiaries, HYT and ZX
|
(3,137,885 | ) |
(e)
|
Detailed cash flow from discontinued operations
|
Six months ended
|
Six months ended
|
|||||||||||
Note
|
June 30, 2011
|
June 30, 2010
|
||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||||||
$
|
$
|
|||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities
|
||||||||||||
Net income for the period
|
10,203,951 | 3,817,507 | ||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operations:
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
|
- | 449,919 | ||||||||||
Amortization
|
- | 390,662 | ||||||||||
Net gain of sale of subsidiaries, HYT and ZX
|
(10,203,951 | ) | - | |||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
Increase in inventories
|
- | (2,023,799 | ) | |||||||||
Increase in deposits and prepaid expenses
|
- | (2,571,852 | ) | |||||||||
Increase in other payables
|
- | 123,320 | ||||||||||
Decrease in accounts payable
|
(549,014 | ) | ||||||||||
Decrease in accounts receivable
|
- | 4,826,739 | ||||||||||
Decrease in other receivables
|
- | 1,434,678 | ||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
- | 5,898,160 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities
|
||||||||||||
Net cash outflow on sale of subsidiaries, HYT and ZX
|
6(d) | (3,137,885 | ) | - | ||||||||
Acquisition of property and equipment
|
(3,291,605 | ) | ||||||||||
Payment for acquisition of land use rights
|
- | (1,157,278 | ) | |||||||||
Payment for construction in progress
|
- | (244,806 | ) | |||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(3,137,885 | ) | (4,693,689 | ) | ||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities
|
||||||||||||
Repayment of long term debts
|
- | (3,154,338 | ) | |||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities
|
- | (3,154,338 | ) | |||||||||
Effects on exchange rate changes on cash
|
- | 477,379 | ||||||||||
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(3,137,885 | ) | (1,472,488 | ) | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
3,137,885 | 2,037,949 | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
- | 565,461 | ||||||||||
Supplementary disclosures of cash flow information:
|
||||||||||||
Cash paid for interest
|
- | 235,826 | ||||||||||
Cash paid for income taxes
|
- | - | ||||||||||
Non - cash transactions
|
||||||||||||
Disposal proceeds receivable of sale of subsidiaries, HYT and ZX
|
34,473,905 | - |
27
7.
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
June 30,
2011 |
December 31,
2011 |
|||||||
$
|
$
|
|||||||
Cash and bank balances
|
856,395 | 3,890,026 |
8.
|
INVENTORIES
|
As of June 30, 2011, inventories are as follows:
June 30,
2011 |
December 31,
2010 |
|||||||
$
|
$
|
|||||||
Bread grass
|
17,764 | 54,096 | ||||||
Beef cattle
|
167,380 | 3,338,237 | ||||||
Organic fertilizer
|
137,344 | 56,593 | ||||||
Raw materials for bread grass and organic fertilizer
|
334,661 | 141,839 | ||||||
Raw materials for HU plantation
|
- | 64,353 | ||||||
Immature seeds
|
809,372 | 801,596 | ||||||
Harvested HU plantation
|
116,657 | 199,234 | ||||||
Unharvested HU plantation
|
282,281 | 29,079 | ||||||
Forage for milk cows and consumable
|
- | 4,228,100 | ||||||
1,865,460 | 8,913,127 |
9.
|
DEPOSITS AND PREPAID EXPENSES
|
June 30,
2011 |
December 31,
2010 |
|||||||
$
|
$
|
|||||||
Deposits for:- | ||||||||
- acquisition of land use rights
|
4,453,665 | 4,453,665 | ||||||
- inventory purchases
|
2,701,312 | 648,303 | ||||||
- lease agreements
|
519,296 | 2,129 | ||||||
- materials used for construction in progress
|
- | 251,329 | ||||||
Prepayments for purchases of milk cows, dairy farm and containers
|
- | 8,874,285 | ||||||
7,674,273 | 14,229,711 |
28
10.
|
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
|
The company has performed an analysis on all of its accounts receivable and determined that all amounts are collectible by the company. As such, all trade receivables are reflected as a current asset and no allowance for bad debt has been recorded as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Bad debts written off for the years ended June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are $0.
Aging analysis of accounts receivable is as follows:
June 30,
2011
|
December 31,
2010
|
|||||||
$
|
$
|
|||||||
0 - 30 days
|
7,563,724 | 5,083,928 | ||||||
31 - 90 days
|
3,285,872 | 175,843 | ||||||
91 - 120 days
|
1,588,589 | 1,093,642 | ||||||
over 120 days and less than 1 year
|
377,719 | 6,450,358 | ||||||
over 1 year
|
7,524,244 | 8,459,044 | ||||||
20,340,148 | 21,262,815 | |||||||
Less: amounts reclassified as long term accounts receivable
|
(7,524,244 | ) | (8,459,044 | ) | ||||
12,815,904 | 12,803,771 |
11.
|
OTHER RECEIVABLES
|
June 30,
2011
|
December 31,
2010
|
|||||||
$
|
$
|
|||||||
Due from employees
|
166,762 | 374,622 | ||||||
Disposal proceeds receivable of sale of subsidiaries
|
34,473,905 | - | ||||||
Due from third parties
|
4,371,140 | 2,636,966 | ||||||
Due from HYT
|
10,434,519 | - | ||||||
Temporary payments for potential investment
|
- | 956,092 | ||||||
49,446,326 | 3,967,680 |
Due from employees and third parties are unsecured, interest free and without fixed term of repayment. Due from employees are the amounts advanced for handling business transactions on behalf of the Company, and are reconciled once the business transactions have been completed. Due from HYT is an amount owned which is unsecured, interest free and will be repayable within one year.
Disposal proceeds receivable from sale of subsidiaries is due from Mr. Xi Ming Sun, a director of ZhongXingNong Nu Co., Ltd
|
(i)
|
of which $3,796,215 shall be paid by way of equal installments of $759,243 each on April 30, June 30, August 31, October31 and December 31 of 2011; and
|
|
(ii)
|
the remaining $40,499,397 shall be paid by way of cash contribution toward land use rights payable as stated in the agreement.
|
29
12. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
June 30,
2011
|
December 31,
2010
|
|||||||
$ | $ | |||||||
Milk cows
|
- | 7,659,263 | ||||||
Plant and machinery
|
1,701,158 | 11,604,975 | ||||||
Structure and leasehold improvements
|
27,211 | 110,801 | ||||||
Mature seeds
|
503,663 | 498,824 | ||||||
Furniture and equipment
|
740,306 | 263,981 | ||||||
Motor vehicles
|
47,568 | 47,568 | ||||||
3,019,906 | 20,185,412 | |||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
(503,760 | ) | (3,029,630 | ) | ||||
Net booking value
|
2,516,146 | 17,155,782 |
Depreciation expense was $47,463 and $69,742 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Depreciation expense was $85,756 and $986,886 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
13. CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
June 30,
2011
|
December 31,
2010
|
|||||||
$ | $ | |||||||
Construction in progress
|
||||||||
- Oven room for production of dried flowers
|
794,656 | 479,559 | ||||||
- Organic fertilizer and bread grass production plant
|
1,930,043 | 1,751,916 | ||||||
2,724,699 | 2,231,475 |
14. LAND USE RIGHTS
Private ownership of land is not permitted in the PRC. Instead, the Company has leased three lots of land. The cost of the first lot of land use rights acquired in 2007 was $6,194,505 which consisted of 1,985.06 acres in the Hebei Province and the leases expire in 2036, 2051, 2067 and 2077. The costs of the second lot of land use rights acquired in 2007 in the Guangdong Province, PRC was $6,408,289 and consists of 174.94 acres and the lease expires in 2067. The cost of the third lot of land use rights acquired in 2008 in the Guangdong Province, PRC was $764,128 which consists 33.68 acres and the lease expires in 2068. The cost of the fourth lot of land use rights acquired in 2010 in the Hebei Province, PRC was $3,223,411 which consists 825.00 acres and the lease expires in 2066. The first lot of land use rights of original cost of $6,194,505 and the fourth lot of land use rights of original cost of $3,223,411 were disposed upon sale of a subsidiary of ZX. The cost of the fifth lot of land use rights acquired in 2011 was $7,042,831 which consisted of 57.58 acres in the Guangdong Province, PRC and the leases expire in 2037.
30
14. LAND USE RIGHTS (CONTINUED)
Land use rights are amortized on the straight line basis over their respective lease periods. The lease period of agriculture land is 30 to 60 years.
June 30,
2011
|
December 31,
2010
|
|||||||
$ | $ | |||||||
Cost
|
19,912,287 | 18,776,139 | ||||||
Less: Accumulated amortization
|
(625,285 | ) | (1,946,729 | ) | ||||
Net book value
|
19,287,002 | 16,829,410 |
Amortization of land use rights was $60,680 and $42,423 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Amortization of land use rights was $128,644 and $673,136 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
15. GOODWILL
Goodwill represents the fair value of the assets acquired the acquisitions over the cost of the assets acquired. It is stated at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Management tests goodwill for impairment on an annual basis or when impairment indicators arise. In these instances, the Company recognizes an impairment loss when it is probable that the estimated cash flows are less than the carrying value of the assets. To date, no such impairment loss has been recorded. On February 15, 2011 and on March 29, 2011, the Company entered the agreement and memorandum of understanding, respectively to sell its 100% equity interest in HYT group (including HYT and ZX) for $45,000,000. Net amount of goodwill attributable to HYT group amounting to $11,275,060 was disposed accordingly.
June 30,
2011
|
December 31,
2010
|
|||||||
$ | $ | |||||||
Goodwill from acquisition
|
724,940 | 38,444,099 | ||||||
Less: Accumulated impairment losses
|
- | (26,444,099 | ) | |||||
Net carrying amount
|
724,940 | 12,000,000 |
16. PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGIES
By an agreement dated November 12, 2008, TRW acquired an enzyme technology master license, registered under a China patent, for the manufacturing of livestock feed and bio-organic fertilizer and its related labels for $8,000,000.
June 30,
2011
|
December 31,
2010
|
|||||||
$ | $ | |||||||
Proprietary technologies
|
8,000,000 | 8,000,000 | ||||||
Less: Accumulated amortisation
|
(871,706 | ) | (712,117 | ) | ||||
Net carrying amount
|
7,128,294 | 7,287,883 |
Amortization of proprietary technologies was $79,794 and $79,794 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Amortization of proprietary technologies was $178,094 and $159,589 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. No impairment of proprietary technologies has been identified by management.
31
17.
|
UNCONSOLIDATED EQUITY INVESTEE
|
On February 11, 2011. CA applied to form a corporate joint venture, Enping City Bi Tao A Power Prawn Culture Development Co. Limited (“EBAPCD”), incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. CA owned a 25% equity interest in EBAPCD. CA has the right to take up to 75% equity interest in EBAPCD. EBAPCD has not yet commenced its business of the cultivation of prawn.
On February 28, 2011, TRW applied to form a corporate joint venture, Enping City Bi Tao A Power Fishery Development Co., Limited (“EBAPFD”), incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. TRW owned a 25% equity interest in EBAPFD. . As of June 30, 2011, the Company invested $1,256,555 in EBAPFD and it has commenced its business of cultivation of fish..
On March 18, 2011, SIAF and SJAP applied to form a corporate joint venture, Linli United A Power Agriculture Co. Limited. (“LLA”), incorporated in the People’s Republic of China, with registered capital of $2,500,000. SIAF and SJAP had 24% and 51% equity interest in LUA, respectively. As of June 30, 2011, LLA has not yet commenced its operations.
On April 15th, 2011, MEIJI applied to form a corporate joint venture, Enping City A Power Cattle Farm Co., Limited (“ECF”), incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. MEIJI had 25% equity interest in ECF. As of June 30, 2011, the Company has not invested an amount in ECF and had not commenced its business of operation.
18. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITY
On Septembter 28, 2009, APWAM acquired the PMH’s 45% equity interest in the Sino - Foreign joint venture company, Qinghai Sanjiang A Power Agriculture Co. Limited (“SJAP”), which was incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. As of December 31, 2010, the Company has invested $1,168,829 into this joint venture. SJAP has not commenced its business of the manufacturing of organic fertilizer, livestock feed, and beef cattle and plantation of crops and pastures. On December 31, 2010, the Company evaluated VIE testing results and concluded that the Company is the primary beneficiary of SJAP’s expected losses or residual returns and SJAP qualifies as a VIE of the Company. As result, the company had consolidated SJAP as a VIE of the Company, and the investment of $1,168,829 was eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
Continuous assessment of its VIE relationship with SJAP
The Company may also have a controlling financial interest in an entity through an arrangement that does not involve voting interests, such as a variable interest entity (“VIE”). The Company evaluates entities deemed to be VIEs using a risk and rewards model to determine whether to consolidate. A VIE is an entity (1) that has total equity at risk that is not sufficient to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other entities, (2) where the group of equity holders does not have the power to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance, or the obligation to absorb the entity’s expected losses or the right to receive the entity’s expected residual returns, or both, or (3) where the voting rights of some investors are not proportional to their obligations to absorb the expected losses of the entity, their rights to receive the expected residual returns of the entity, or both, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights.
The Company also quantitatively and qualitatively examined if SJAP is considered a VIE. Qualitative analyses considered the extent to which the nature of its variable interest exposed the Company to losses. For quantitative analyses, the Company also used internal cash flow models to determine if SJAP was a VIE and, if so, whether the Company was the primary beneficiary. The projection of these cash flows and probabilities thereof requires significant management judgment because of the inherent limitations that relate to the use of historical data for the projection of future events.
On March 31, 2011, the Company evaluated the above VIE testing results and concluded that the Company is the primary beneficiary of SJAP ’s expected losses or residual returns and SJAP qualifies as a VIE of the Company.
32
18. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITY (CONTINUED)
The reasons for the changes are as follows:
|
l
|
Originally, the board of directors of Sanjiang A Power (SJAP) consisted of 7 members; 3 appointees from Qinghai Sanjiang( one of stockholder), 1 from Garwor (one of stockholder), and 3 from the Company such that the Company did not have majority interest represented in the board of directors of SJAP.
|
|
l
|
On May 7, 2010, Qinghai Sanjiang sold and transferred its equity interest in SJAP to Garwor. The aforesaid sale and transfer was approved by the State Administration for Industry And Commerce of Xining City Government of the People’s Republic of China.
|
Consequently Garwor and the Company agreed that the new board of directors of SJAP would consist of 3 members; 1 appointee from Garwor and 2 appointees from the Company, such that the Company now had a majority interest in the board of directors of SJAP. Also, and in accordance with the Company’s Sino Joint Venture Agreement, the financial officer of SJAP was appointed by SIAF’s management.
As result, the financial statements of SJAP were included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
19.
|
LICENSE RIGHTS
|
Pursuant to an agreement dated August 1, 2006 between Infinity Environmental Group Limited (“Infinity”) and the Company, the Company was granted an A Power Technology License with a condition that the Company was required to pay the license fee covering 500 units of APM as performance payment to Infinity on or before July 31, 2008 and this performance payment of 500 units of APM would be allowed to be as deduction from any future sales of the APM units This license allows the Company to develop service, manage and supply A Power Technology Farms in the PRC using the A Power Technology, but subject to a condition that the Company is required to pay a license fee to Infinity once the Company has sold the license to its customer. Under the said license, the Company has the right to authorize developers and/or joint venture partners to develop A Power Technology Farms in the PRC. Infinity is a company incorporated in Australia.
20. OTHER PAYABLES
June 30,
2011
|
December 31,
2010
|
|||||||
$ | $ | |||||||
Due to third parties
|
3,282,061 | 1,077,738 | ||||||
Due to related parties
|
22,411 | 223,884 | ||||||
Due to employees and others
|
- | 110,668 | ||||||
3,304,472 | 1,412,290 |
Due to third parties, related parties, employees and others are unsecured, interest free and have no fixed terms of repayment.
20. BILLINGS ON UNCOMPLETED CONTRACTS IN EXCESS OF COSTS AND ESTIMATED EARNINGS
June 30,
2011
|
December 31,
2011
|
|||||||
$ | $ | |||||||
Billings
|
6,296,703 | - | ||||||
Less: Costs
|
(2,054,375 | ) | - | |||||
Estimated earnings
|
(2,557,524 | ) | - | |||||
Billing in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contract
|
1,684,804 | - |
33
22. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY.
On March 23, 2010, the Company authorized 100 shares of Series A preferred stock at $0.001 par value. As of the same date, 100 shares of Series A preferred stock were issued at $1 per share for cash in the amount of $100.
On various dates through January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010, (i) 9,680,145 shares of common stock were issued for $10,445,084 at fair value ranging from $0.48 to $1.27 to settle debts due to third parties; (ii) 4,770,855 shares of common stock were issued for $3,915,436 at fair value ranging from $0.50 to $1.27 to settle debts due to proprietary technologies payable (iii) 5,190,002 shares of common stock were voluntarily cancelled by shareholders.
On March 22, 2010, the Company authorized 10,000,000 shares of Series B convertible preferred stock at $0.001 at par value. Series B convertible preferred stock is redeemable, the stockholders are not entitled to receive any dividend and voting rights but are entitled to rank senior over common stockholders on liquidation, and can convert to common stock on a one for one basis at any time. On June 26, 2010, 7,000,000 shares of common stock were cancelled and the Company issued 7,000,000 shares of Series B convertible preferred stock of $1 per share. The company has authorized 10,000,000 shares of Series B convertible preferred stock with 7,000,000 and 0 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Series A preferred stock stockholders
(i) are not entitled to receive any dividend;
(ii) vote together with the shares of Common Stock of the Corporation as a single class and, regardless of the number of shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding and as long as at least one of such shares of Series A Preferred Stock is outstanding, shall represent eighty percent (80%) of all votes entitled to be voted at any annual or special meeting of shareholders of the Corporation or action by written consent of shareholders. Each outstanding share of the Series A Preferred Stock shall represent its proportionate share of the 80% which is allocated to the outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock.
(iii) are entitled to rank senior over common stockholders , other class or Series B convertible preferred stockholders on liquidation. The company has authorized 100 shares of Series A preferred stock with 100 and 0 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
On May 4, 2010, the Company issued employees a total of 497,059 shares of common stock valued at fair value of $1.00 per share for $497,059 as stock based compensation. On October 30, 2010, the Company issued employees a total of 22,500 shares of common stock valued at fair value of $1.50 per share for $33,750 as stock based compensation. The Company recognized $530,809 of stock based compensation relating to these transactions.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company issued 2,602,000 shares of common stock for $3,910,500 at values ranging from $1.40 to $1.50 per share to settle debts due to third parties.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company reacquired 1,000,000 shares of treasury stock for $1,250,0000 at price $1.25 per share.
21. BANK BORROWINGS
There are no provisions in the group’s bank borrowings that would accelerate repayment of debt as a result of a change in credit ratings or a material adverse change in the Company’s business.
Amount | |||||||||||
Name of bank
|
Interest
rate
|
Term
|
Security
|
June 30, 2011
|
December 31, 2010
|
||||||
$
|
$
|
||||||||||
Agricultural Development Bank of China
|
6.75%
|
4/29/2007-4/28/2012
|
Corporate guarantee by third party
|
-
|
3,776,435
|
34
23. OBLIGATION UNDER OPERATING LEASES
The Company leases (i) 2,178 square feet of agriculture space used for offices, currently with a monthly rent of $479 in Enping City, Guangdong Province, PRC, and the lease expires on March 31, 2014 and (ii)2,300 square feet of office space in Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, PRC, currently with a monthly rent of $4,238 and the lease expires on October 15, 2012.
Lease expense was $14,091 and $14,091 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Lease expense was $28,182 and $28,182 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The future minimum lease payments as of June 30, 2011, are as follows:
June 30,
2011
|
||||
$ | ||||
Year ended December 31, 2011
|
28,182 | |||
Year ended December 31, 2012
|
56,364 | |||
Year ended December 31, 2013
|
5,160 | |||
Year ended December 31, 2014
|
5,160 | |||
Thereafter
|
- | |||
94,866 |
24. CONTINGENCIES
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company did not have any pending claims, charges, or litigation that it expects would have a material adverse effect on its consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of incomes and comprehensive income or cash flows.
25. GAIN (LOSS) ON EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBTS
The Company entered several agreements with third parties to settle debts by issuance of the Company’s common stock. The shares issued by the Company were valued at the trading price of the stock on the date the shares were issued. Any deficit (excess) of the fair value of the shares over the carrying cost of the debt has been reported as a gain (loss) on the extinguishment of debts of $489,500 and $(1,586,000) has been credited (charged) to operations for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Any deficit (excess) of the fair value of the shares over the carrying cost of the debt has been reported as a gain (loss) on the extinguishment of debts of $582,426 and $(6,151,180) has been credited (charged) to operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
35
26. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In addition to the transactions and balances as disclosed elsewhere in these consolidated financial statements, during the year, the Company had the following significant related party transactions:-
Name of related party | Nature of transactions | |
Mr. Solomon Yip Kun Lee, Chairman
|
Included in due to a director, due to Mr. Solomon Yip Kun Lee is $90,747 and $926,196 as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 respectively. The amount is unsecured, interest free and has no fixed term of repayment.
|
|
Mr. Xi Ming Sun, director of
ZhongXingNong Nu Co., Ltd
|
During the six months ended March 31, 2011, the Company sold its 100% equity interest in HYT group (including HYT and ZX) for $45,000,000.
|
|
Included in other receivables, due from Mr. Xi Ming Sun is $34,473,905 and $0 as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 respectively. The amount is unsecured, interest free and has fixed term of repayment.
|
||
Included in other payables, due to Mr. Xi Ming Sun is $0 and $213,223 as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 respectively. The amount is unsecured, interest free and has no fixed term of repayment.
|
||
Mr. Yi Lin Zhao, director of Qinghai Sanjiang A Power Agriculture Co., Ltd
|
Included in other payables, due to Mr. Yi Lin Zhao is $0 and $19,661 as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 respectively. The amount is unsecured, interest free and has no fixed term of repayment.
|
|
Mr. Rui Xiong He , director of Jiang Men City Heng Sheng Tai Agriculture Development Co. Ltd, subsidiary of the Company
|
During the six months ended March 31, 2011, Mr. Rui Xiong He sold his land use rights to the Company for $7,042,831.
Included in other payables, due to Mr. Rui Xiong He is $22,411 and $0 as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The amount is land use rights payable, unsecured, interest free and has no fixed term of repayment.
|
|
Enping Bi Tao A Power Prawn Culture Development Co., Ltd (under application), equity investee
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company entered into a prawn farm contract with Enping Bi Tao A Power Prawn Culture Development Co., Ltd (under application) with a contract value of $4,051,550 and recognized income of $2,141,879 .
|
|
Billings in excess costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contract, due to Enping Bi Tao A Power Prawn Culture Development Co. Ltd (under application) is $528,271 and $0 as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The amount is unsecured, interest free and has no fixed term of repayment.
|
||
Enping City Bi Tao A Power Fishery Development Co., Limited (under application), equity investee
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company entered into a fishery farm contract with Enping Bi Tao A Power Fishery Development Co., Ltd (under application) with a contract value of $491,200 and recognized income of $81,543.
|
|
Billings in excess costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contract, due to Enping Bi Tao A Power Fishery Development Co., Ltd (under application) is $357,157 and $0 as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The amount is unsecured, interest free and has no fixed term of repayment.
|
36
26. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (CONTINUED)
Enping City A Power Cattle Farm Co., Limited, equity investee
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company entered into a cattle farm contract with Enping Bi Tao A Power Cattle Farm Co., Ltd (under application) with a contract value of $1,753,953 and recognized income of $334,102.
Billings in excess costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contract, due to Enping Bi Tao A Power Cattle Farm Co., Ltd (under application) is $799,376 and $0 as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The amount is unsecured, interest free and has no fixed term of repayment.
|
37
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
You should read the following discussion together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This discussion contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those we currently anticipate as a result of many factors.
Forward Looking Statements
Some of the information in this section contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. You can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as "may," "will," "expect," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate" and "continue," or similar words. You should read statements that contain these words carefully because they:
•
|
discuss our future expectations;
|
•
|
contain projections of our future results of operations or of our financial condition; and
|
•
|
state other "forward-looking" information.
|
We believe it is important to communicate our expectations. However, there may be events in the future that we are not able to accurately predict or over which we have no control. Our actual results and the timing of certain events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth under "Risk Factors," "Business" and elsewhere in this Report. See "Risk Factors."
Unless stated otherwise, the words “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Company” or “Sino Agro” in this Report collectively refers to the Company, Sino Agro Food, Inc.
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes, and other financial information included in this Form 10.
Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis contains not only statements that are historical facts, but also statements that are forward-looking (within the meaning of section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 is not available to us as a non-reporting issuer. Further, Section 27A(b)(2)(D) of the Securities Act and Section 21E(b)(2)(D) of the Securities Exchange Act expressly state that the safe harbor for forward looking statements does not apply to statements made in connection with an initial public offering.
Forward-looking statements are, by their very nature, uncertain and risky. These risks and uncertainties include international, national, and local general economic and market conditions; our ability to sustain, manage, or forecast growth; our ability to successfully make and integrate acquisitions; new product development and introduction; existing government regulations and changes in, or the failure to comply with, government regulating statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, the actual results and outcomes may differ materially from the results and outcomes discussed in the forward-looking statements. You are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and in our other reports as we attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations and prospects.
Overview
We are an integrated developer, producer and distributor of organic produce and agricultural / aquacultural products of high quality standard, with our subsidiaries operating in China.
Currently we are generating revenues from four divisional businesses, namely:
·
|
The Dairy business, through a combination of Hang Yu Tai Investment Limited and ZhongXingNongMu Co. Ltd. [Sold in March 2011]
|
·
|
The Plantation business, through a combination of Macau Eiji Company Limited and Jiang Men City Heng Sheng Tai Agriculture Development Co. Ltd.
|
·
|
The Fishery business, through a combination of Capital Award Inc. and SIAF.
|
·
|
The Beef business , has two divisions;
|
(1) through a combination of Qinghai Sanjiang A Power Agriculture Co. Ltd. and Linli A Power Agriculture Co. Ltd. and
(2) through Macau Eiji Company Limited acting as the technology and servicing provider and Enping A Power Cattle Farm Co. Ltd.
38
Consolidated Results of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
Revenues
Revenues including continued and discontinued operations increased by $1,734,104 or 34.88% to $6,705,370 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $4,971,266 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to the increase of revenue generated from the fishery, HU plantation, cattle farm, beef and the maturity of other sectors’ businesses improving their revenues even though the Company discontinued dairy segment since January 2011. The Company earned revenue $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from discontinued segment – dairy as compared with revenue $4,575,735 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 from discontinued segment - dairy.
The following chart illustrates the changes by category from the three months ended June 30, 2011 to June 30, 2010.
Q2 | Q2 | |||||||||||
Category
|
2011
|
2010
|
Difference
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Fishery
|
$
|
2,555,474
|
$
|
395,531
|
$
|
2,159,943
|
||||||
|
||||||||||||
Dairy
|
-
|
4,575,735
|
(4,575,735)
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Plantation
|
1,222,241
|
-
|
1,222,241
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Cattle farm
|
954,577
|
-
|
954,577
|
|||||||||
Beef
|
1,973,078
|
-
|
1,973,078
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Totals
|
$
|
6,705,370
|
$
|
4,971,266
|
$
|
1,734,104
|
Revenue –Fishery. Revenues from fishery increased by $2,159,943 or 546.87% from $395,531 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $2,555,474 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in fishery was primarily due to our increased contract service income from fishery and prawn development contract for the three months ended June 30, 2011 instead of consulting income for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Revenue –Dairy.. Revenues from dairy decreased by $4,575,735 from $4,575,735 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $0 for the three months ended 30 June 2011. The decrease in dairy was primarily due to dairy segment sold out in January 2011.
Revenue –Plantation. Revenues from plantation increased by $1,222,241 from $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $1,222,241 for the three months ended June 30, 2011.
Revenue – Cattle farm. Revenues from cattle farm development increased by $954,577 from $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $954,577. The increase in cattle farm was primarily due to starting up new business of provision of development contract service of cattle farm for the three months ended June 30, 2011.
Revenue – Beef. Revenues from beef increased by $1,983,078 from $0 for the three months ended June 2010 to $1,983,078 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in beef was primarily due to starting up new business of organic fertilizer, bread grass cultivation since Q3 2010.
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold including continued and discontinued operations increased by $829,379 or 40.41% to $2,881,648 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $2,052,269 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to the Company increased its scale of operation from continued segment- fishery, plantation and beef for three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared for the three months ended June 30, 2010 even though the Company discontinued dairy segment since January 2011 with cost of goods sold for dairy segment of $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared with cost of goods sold- dairy segment of $2,052,269 for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
The following chart illustrates the changes by category from the three months ended June 30, 2011 to June 30, 2010:
Q2 | Q2 | |||||||||||
Category
|
2011
|
2010
|
Difference
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Fishery
|
986,650
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
986,650
|
|||||||
|
||||||||||||
Dairy
|
-
|
2,052,269
|
(2,052,269
|
) | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Plantation
|
431,396
|
-
|
431,396
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Cattle farm
|
620,474
|
-
|
620,474
|
620
|
||||||||
Beef
|
843,128
|
-
|
843,128
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Totals
|
$
|
2,881,648
|
$
|
2,052,269
|
$
|
829,379
|
39
Cost of goods sold –Fishery. Cost of goods sold from fishery increased by $986,650 from $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $986,650 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in fishery was primarily due to cost of sales for consulting service for the six months ended June 30, 2011 in contrast against cost of development contract of fish and prawn farm of $986,650 for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Cost of goods sold –Dairy. Cost of goods sold from dairy decreased by $2,052,269 from $2,052,269 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in dairy was primarily due to dairy segment sold out in January 2011.
Cost of goods sold –Plantation. Cost of goods sold from plantation increased by $431,396 from $0 for the three months ended 30 June 2010 to $431,396 for the three months ended June 30, 2011.
Cost of goods sold – Cattle farm. Cost of goods sold from cattle farm development increased by $620,474 from $0 for the three months ended 30 June 2010 to $620,474. The increase in cattle farm was primarily due to starting up new business of provision of development contract service of cattle farm for the three months ended June 30, 2011.
Cost of goods sold – Beef. Cost of goods sold from beef increased by $843,128 from $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $843,128 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in beef was primarily due to starting up new business of organic fertilizer, bread grass cultivation since Q3 2010.
Gross Profit
Gross profit including continued and discontinued business increased by $904,725 or 30.99% to $3,823,722 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $2,918,997 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to the corresponding increase in operation revenues from fishery, plantation and beef even though the Company discontinued dairy segment since January 2011and decrease in cost of goods from dairy of $2,629,038 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 to $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2011.
The following chart illustrates the changes by category from the three months Ended June 30, 2011 to June 30, 2010.
The gross profit by category is as follows:
Q2 | Q2 | |||||||||||
Category
|
2011
|
2010
|
Difference | |||||||||
Fishery
|
1,568,824 | 395,531 |
1,173,293
|
|||||||||
Dairy
|
- | 2,523,466 | (2,523,466 | ) | ||||||||
Plantation
|
790,845 | - | 790,8457 | |||||||||
Cattle farm
|
334,103
|
- |
334,103
|
|||||||||
Beef
|
1,129,950
|
- |
1,129,950
|
|||||||||
Total
|
3,823,722 | 2,918,997 | 904,725 |
Gross profit –Fishery. Gross profit from fishery increased by $1,568,824 from $395,531 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $1,568,824 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in fishery was primarily due to our increased the volume of contract service income from fishery and prawn development contract for the six months ended June 30, 2011 instead of consulting income for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Gross profit –Dairy. Gross profit from dairy decreased by $2,523,466 from $2,523,466 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in dairy was primarily due to dairy segment sold out in January 2011.
Gross profit –Plantation. Gross profit from plantation increased by $790,845 from $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $790,845 for the three months ended June 30, 2011.
Gross profit – Cattle farm. Gross profit from cattle farm development increased by $334,103 from $0 for the three months ended 30 June 2010 to $334,103. The increase in cattle farm was primarily due to starting up new business of provision of development contract service of cattle farm for the three months ended June 30, 2011.
Gross profit – Beef. Gross profit from beef increased by $1,129,950 from $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $1,129,950 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in beef was primarily due to starting up new business of organic fertilizer, bread grass cultivation since Q3 2010.
40
General and Administrative Expenses and Interest Expenses
General and administrative expenses and interest expenses (including depreciation and amortization) for continued and discontinued operations decreased by $610,119 or 52.66% to $548,394 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $1,158,513 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease was primarily due to decrease of $403,566 in the wages and salaries expense from $533,737 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $130,171 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and the decrease in interest expenses of $115,479 from $119,779 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $4,300 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 due to discontinued dairy segment.
Q2 | Q2 | |||||||||||
Category
|
2011
|
2010
|
Difference
|
|||||||||
Office and corporate expenses
|
$
|
204,816
|
$
|
180,943
|
|
$
|
23,873
|
|||||
Wages and Salaries
|
$
|
130,171
|
$
|
533,737
|
$
|
(403,566)
|
||||||
Traveling and related lodging
|
$
|
13,160
|
$
|
63,193,
|
$
|
(50,033)
|
||||||
Motor vehicles expenses and local transportation
|
$
|
13,211
|
$
|
40,065
|
$
|
(26,854)
|
||||||
Entertainments and meals
|
$
|
13,707
|
$
|
18,127
|
$
|
(4,420)
|
||||||
Others and miscellaneous
|
$
|
17,644
|
$
|
35,195
|
$
|
(17,551)
|
||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
$
|
151,385
|
$
|
167,474
|
$
|
(16,089)
|
||||||
Sub-total
|
$
|
544,094
|
$
|
1,038,734
|
$
|
(494,640)
|
||||||
Interest expenses
|
$
|
4,300
|
$
|
119,779
|
$
|
(115,479)
|
||||||
Total
|
$
|
548,394
|
$
|
1,158,513
|
$
|
(610,119)
|
Depreciation and Amortization:
Depreciation and amortization of continued and discontinued business decreased by $16,089 or 9.60% to $151,385 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $167,474 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease was primarily due to the decrease of depreciation by $22,279 for three months ended June 30, 2011 from depreciation of $69,742 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $47,463, and the increase of amortization by $18,257 to $140,474 for three months ended June 30, 2011 from amortization of $122,217 for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
In this respect, total depreciation and amortization amounted to $187,937 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, out of which amount, $151,385 was booked under General and administration expenses and $36,552 booked under cost of goods sold; whereas total depreciation and amortization was at $191,959 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and out of which amount, $167,474 was booked under General and Administration expenses and $24,485 was booked under cost of goods sold.
Gain (loss) of extinguishment of debts
Any deficit (excess) of the fair value of the shares over the carrying cost of the debt has been reported as a gain (loss) on the extinguishment of debts of $489,500 and $(1,586,000) has been credited (charged) to operations for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Taxes
There was no income tax payable in both of the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2011.
Under new tax legislation of China beginning January 2008, the agriculture, dairy and fishery sectors are exempted from enterprise income taxes.
However result from the application of the Joint Venture Company of the Enping Fish Farm, we received a notice from the tax department that only 50% of its income tax would exempted regulated by the local Province Government. In this respect we are appealing this out-come with the local Province Government.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Revenues
Revenues including continued and discontinued operations increased by $444,313 or 4.74% to $9,826,901 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $9,382,588 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to the increase of revenue generated from the fishery, HU plantation, cattle farm, beef and the maturity of other sectors’ businesses improving their revenues even though the Company discontinued dairy segment since January 2011. The Company earned revenue $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from discontinued segment – dairy as compared with revenue $8,687,057 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 from discontinued segment - dairy.
The following chart illustrates the changes by category from the six Months Ended June 30, 2011 to June 30, 2010.
Category
|
2011
|
2010
|
|
|||||||||
|
Q1 and Q2
|
Q1 and Q2
|
Difference
|
|||||||||
Fishery
|
$
|
4,115,219
|
$
|
695,531
|
$
|
3,419,688
|
||||||
|
||||||||||||
Dairy
|
-
|
8,687,057
|
(8,687,057)
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Plantation
|
1,222,241
|
-
|
1,222,241
|
|||||||||
Cattle Farm
|
954,577
|
-
|
954,577
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Beef
|
3,534,864
|
-
|
3,534,864
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Totals
|
$
|
9,826,901
|
$
|
9,382,588
|
$
|
444,313
|
Revenue –Fishery. Revenues from fishery increased by $3,419,688 or 491.66 % from $695,531 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $4,115,219 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in fishery was primarily due to our increased contract service income from fishery and prawn development contract for the six months ended June 30, 2011 instead of consulting income for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
41
Revenue –Dairy.. Revenues from dairy decreased by $8,687,057 from $8,687,057 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $0 for the six months ended 30 June 2011. The decrease in dairy was primarily due to dairy segment sold out in January 2011.
Revenue –Plantation. Revenues from plantation increased by $1,222,241 from $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $1,222,241 for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Revenue – Cattle farm. Revenues from cattle farm development increased by $954,577 from $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $954,577. The increase in cattle farm was primarily due to starting up new business of provision of development contract service of cattle farm for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Revenue – Beef. Revenues from beef increased by $3,534,864 from $0 for the six months ended June 2010 to $3,534,864 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in beef was primarily due to starting up new business of organic fertilizer, bread grass cultivation since Q3 2010.
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold including continued and discontinued operations increased by $195,252 or 5.04% to $4,072,263 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $3,877,011 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to the Company increased scale of operation from continued segment- fishery, plantation and beef for six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared for the six months ended June 30, 2010 even though the Company discontinued dairy segment since January 2011 with cost of goods sold for dairy segment of $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared with cost of goods sold- dairy segment of $3,877,011 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
The following chart illustrates the changes by category from the six months ended June 30, 2011 to June 30, 2010.
Category
|
2011
|
2010
|
|
|||||||||
|
Q1 and Q2
|
Q1 and Q2
|
Difference
|
|||||||||
Fishery
|
$
|
1,606,581
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
1,606,581
|
||||||
Dairy
|
-
|
3,877,011
|
(3,877,011
|
) | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Plantation
|
431,396-
|
-
|
431,396-
|
|||||||||
Cattle farm
|
620,474
|
-
|
620,474
|
|||||||||
Beef
|
1,413,812
|
-
|
1,413,812
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Totals
|
$
|
4,072,263
|
$
|
3,877,011
|
$
|
195,252
|
Cost of goods sold –Fishery. Cost of goods sold from fishery increased by $1,606,581 from $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $1,606,581 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in fishery was primarily due to cost of sales for consulting service for the six months ended June 30, 2011 in contrast against cost of development contract of fish and prawn farm of $1,606,581 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Cost of goods sold –Dairy.. Cost of goods sold from dairy decreased by $3,877,011 from $3,877,011 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in dairy was primarily due to dairy segment sold out in January 2011.
Cost of goods sold –Plantation. Cost of goods sold from plantation increased by $431,396 from $0 for the six months ended 30 June 2010 to $431,396 for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Cost of goods sold – Cattle farm. Cost of goods sold from cattle farm development increased by $620,474 from $0 for the six months ended 30 June 2010 to $620,474. The increase in cattle farm was primarily due to starting up new business of provision of development contract service of cattle farm for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Cost of goods sold – Beef. Cost of goods sold from beef increased by $1,413,812 from $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $1,413,812 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in beef was primarily due to starting up new business of organic fertilizer, bread grass cultivation since Q3 2010.
Gross Profit
Gross profit including continued and discontinued business increased by $249,061 or 4.52%% to $5,754,638 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $5,505,577 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to the corresponding increase in operation revenues. The increase was primarily due to the corresponding increase in scale of operation of revenues from fishery, plantation and beef even though the Company discontinued Dairy operation since January 2011and decrease in cost of goods from dairy of $4,810,046 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 to $0 from the six months ended June 30, 2010.
42
The following chart illustrates the changes by category from the six Months Ended June 30, 2011 to June 30, 2010.
The gross profit by category is as follows:
Category
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||||
Q1 and Q2 | Q1 and Q2 | Difference | ||||||||||
Fishery
|
2,508,638 | 695,531 | 1,813,107 | |||||||||
Dairy
|
- | 4,810,046 | (4,810,046 | ) | ||||||||
Plantation
|
790,845- | - | 790,845 | |||||||||
Cattle Farm
|
334,103 | - 334,103 | ||||||||||
Beef
|
2,121,052 | - | 2,121,052 | |||||||||
Total
|
5,754,638 | 5,505,577 | 249,061 |
Gross profit –Fishery. Gross profit from fishery increased by $1,813,107 from $695,531 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $2,508,638 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in fishery was primarily due to our increased the volume of contract service income from fishery and prawn development contract for the six months ended June 30, 2011 instead of consulting income for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Gross profit –Dairy. Gross profit from dairy decreased by $4,810,046 from $4,810,046 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in dairy was primarily due to dairy segment sold out in January 2011.
Gross profit –Plantation. Gross profit from plantation increased by $790,845 from $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $790,845 for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Gross profit – Cattle farm. Gross profit from cattle farm development increased by $334,102 from $0 for the six months ended 30 June 2010 to $334,102. The increase in cattle farm was primarily due to starting up new business of provision of development contract service of cattle farm for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Gross profit – Beef. Revenues from beef increased by $2,121,052 from $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $2,121,052 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in beef was primarily due to starting up new business of organic fertilizer, bread grass cultivation since Q3 2010.
General and Administrative Expenses and Interest Expenses
General and administrative expenses and interest expenses (including depreciation and amortization) for continued and discontinued operations decreased by $1,198,400 or 49.11% to $ 1,241,712 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $2,440,112 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease was primarily due to decrease of $503,609 in the wages and salaries expense from $881,686 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $378,077 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and the decrease in depreciation & amortization charges to $909,608 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $240,872 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 due to discontinued dairy segment.
Category
|
2011
|
2010
|
|
|||||||||
Q1 and Q2
|
Q1 and Q2
|
Difference
|
||||||||||
Office and corporate expenses
|
$
|
461,810
|
$
|
230,762
|
|
$
|
231,048
|
|||||
Wages and Salaries
|
$
|
378,077
|
$
|
934,,068
|
$
|
(555,991
|
) | |||||
Traveling and related lodging
|
$
|
37,539
|
$
|
32,817
|
$
|
4,722
|
||||||
Motor vehicles expenses and local transportation
|
$
|
19,756
|
$
|
6,634
|
$
|
13,122
|
||||||
Entertainments and meals
|
$
|
36,636
|
$
|
24,841
|
$
|
11,795
|
|
|||||
Others and miscellaneous
|
$
|
59,550
|
$
|
60,695
|
$
|
(1,145
|
)
|
|||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
$
|
240,872
|
$
|
909,608
|
$
|
(668,736
|
) | |||||
Sub-total
|
$
|
1,234,240
|
$
|
2,199,425
|
$
|
(965,185)
|
||||||
Interest expenses
|
$
|
7,472
|
$
|
240,687
|
$
|
(233,215)
|
||||||
Total
|
$
|
1,241,712
|
$
|
2,440,112
|
$
|
(1,198,400)
|
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization of continued and discontinued business decreased by $753,541 or 191.99% to $392,494 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $1,196,035 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease was primarily due to the decrease of depreciation by 670,554 for six months ended June 30, 2011 from depreciation of $760,483 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, and the decrease of amortization by $78,812 for six months ended June 30, 2011 from amortization of $385,552 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
43
In this respect, total depreciation and amortization amounted to $392,494 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, out of which amount, $240,872 was booked under General and administration expenses and $151,622 was booked under cost of goods sold; whereas total depreciation and amortization was at $1,176,035 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and out of which amount, $209,608 was booked under General and Administration expenses and $966,427 was booked under cost of goods sold.
Gain (loss) of extinguishment of debts
Any deficit (excess) of the fair value of the shares over the carrying cost of the debt has been reported as a gain (loss) on the extinguishment of debts of $582,426 and $(6,151,180) has been credited (charged) to operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Taxes
There was no income tax payable in both of the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2011.
Under new tax legislation of China beginning January 2008, the agriculture, dairy and fishery sectors are exempted from enterprise income taxes.
However result from the application of the Joint Venture Company of the Enping Fish Farm, we received a notice from the tax department that only 50% of its income tax would exempted regulated by the local Province Government. In this respect we are appealing this out-come with the local Province Government.
OTHER SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTIONS AND OPERATION PROGRESSES THAT MAY AFFECT CASH/LIQUIDITY:
As of June 30, 2011, we had no other significant transactions that may affect our cash / Liquidity other than the seasonal variation effects and the inflation factors mentioned earlier and the effects stated herein: “The Company considers all highly liquid securities with original maturities of three months or less when acquired to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents kept with financial institutions in People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) are not insured or otherwise protected. Should any of those institutions holding the Company’s cash become insolvent, or the Company is unable to withdraw funds for any reason, the Company could lose the cash on deposit on that institution.”
Seasonal Factors and Operation Progresses Affecting our Operations
In China, winter season is from mid-November to mid-March. The Chinese lunar year holiday falls during this period in February each year. During the Chinese lunar holiday, Chinese workers take a 30-day holiday (although the Government’s official holiday period is for 10 days). The months of March and April are the times for ground preparation and seedling for the new season.
These seasonal factors have certain influences on our overall operations explained as follows:
The Plantation - The HU flowers’ harvesting season is from July to the end of October. During this time, the bulk of our freshly harvested flowers are dried and stored. Although the dried flowers are sold year round, the bulk of sales are from November to June each year. In general, we sell the dried flowers at their highest prices from April through June. During 2009, we did not have enough dried flowers to store and sell throughout the entire year and our harvest was sold by the end of March. However, our 2010 harvest was at 31.5 million pieces which is twice the volume of our 2009 harvest of 16.5 million pieces in 2009. This harvest of 31.5 million is still insufficient flowers to be processed into dried flowers to be stored and sold through to June 2011 to even out our annual sales through the year of 2011.
Updating harvest for season 2011:
·
|
The 2011 season so far looked normal without much adverse seasonal affects, such that as at June 30th, 2011 HST harvested just under 15 million pieces of flowers which is a performance far superior to the 2010 season when HST had no harvest during June 2010. Out of which HST sold over 6.5 million pieces of fresh flowers at an average of RMB0.55 per pieces against the production cost of RMB0.18 / piece and dried out over 79.784 tons of dried flowers at production cost of around RMB13.63 per Kg with latest wholesaling prices at an average of RMB43 / Kg.
|
·
|
At this rate (and if seasonal factors will allow), HST is expecting a reasonable harvest result to reach anywhere within 60 million to 75 million pieces by the end of October 2011. As such HST will be able to retain reasonable amount of dried stocks to be sold in 2012 targeting to even out its yearly sales.
|
·
|
At the same time, it is discovered during June 2011 that HST’s drying facilities are not efficient to dry up all of its June harvest such that there were many fresh flowers had to be sold instead of being dried. Therefore the Company is intending to build a new drying and processing facility within its farm property during 2011 to ensure that HST will have the drying and processing capacity to handle at least 120 million pieces of flowers per season. In future, this will allow HST to buy up fresh flowers from regional farmers who in general do not have enough drying facilities.
|
·
|
Furthermore, through the experience of the past seasons, the Company is convinced that the harvested quantity of HU flowers will be increased rapidly if the plantation can be semi-green housed (meaning enclosed environment during winter months and open top conditions during summer months), because under semi-green house conditions, we can eliminate most of the seasonal factors, achieving easier disease control, grow healthier plants to achieve better yearly yields. Therefore the Company is intending to green house the plantation within 2011, however cost of building materials are increasing progressively in China in 2011 such that the Company may need to use the combination of used and new building materials in order that the green houses can be constructed within a capped budget of around US$7 million.
|
Updating on fishery operation 2011:
By July 15th 2011, we have two fish farms in operation of which are being explained as follows:
·
|
The Enping APM fish farm (which is the first APM farm built by CA in China in November 2010), and by July 15th 2011, we have obtained 25% equity interest in this farm whereas the farm is now in full operational order stocking currently over 165,000 (Sleepy Cod) fingerlings measuring from 60mm up to 120mm sized fingerlings). This farm has a total of 16 grow-out tanks, and it is anticipating that for the remaining months of 2011, each tank would have a grow-out capacity to gain up to 100 Kg of net fish weight per day per tank. In this respect, we intended to arrange by August 2011 all the said 165,000 fingerling to be kept in no more than 8 tanks (of which each of the said fingerling tank are performing under it’s designed grow-out capacity due to the fact that the growth rate of the smaller sized fish in general are slower than the bigger fish); the rest of the other 8 tanks will be used to keep and to grow out fish from fish that will be much bigger (i.e. from 300 gm sized fish and upward) in order that revenues will be generated much quicker. The reason of why we could not house much bigger fish in quantity earlier is that, bacteria in the Bio-filters also need time to grow to a respectable quantity in order that enough soluble waste will be consumed to maintain the water quality of the tank. Based on this arrangement, we are expecting that anywhere up to 250 tons of fish sales will be generated on or before 31st December 2011.
|
44
Although our APM farm is designed to grow fish in house and on land under controlled environment to avoid most of the adverse affect that may be caused through seasonal variation factors, however, Sleepy Cod (the species of fish that we are growing currently) is a species of fish also subjected to seasonal factors (i.e. there is a certain time of the year that they are particularly sensitive to transportation and to be moved from their habitat, their breeding season is restricted between June to September in China and their eating habits can be affected by daily temperature changes etc ) that may have certain impacts on this Enping APM fish farm’s operation).
·
|
The 600 Mu (about 100 acres) of open dam fish farm which we contracted during April 2011 with a local fish grower to grow up to 600,000 fish for and on behalf of CA between 2011 and 2012. We have stocked these dams with over 600,000 (fingerlings (ranging from 40mm up to 120mm) and fish between (200 gram up to 350 gram)). The grow-out of these fish is based on a fixed cost basis whereas the said grower is responsible for the mortality factor such that we are guaranteed to have a minimum of 300 tons of fish for sales within the contracted period. In this respect we are anticipating that there will be a minimum of 100 tons of fish sales to be generated from these dams on or before the year end of 2011.
|
These open dams are very much subjective to seasonal factors (i.e. heavy rainy season or dried spell could affects the overall water quality, the hot summer climate could increase the disease problems enhancing the frequent application of antibiotic and chemicals and the fish will not grow during cold winter season etc.) However, our Enping APM Fish Farm will work in well with these open dams since it will take up most of the bigger sized fish (i.e. from 250 gram / fish and upward) from these dams and to grow and to sell them to capture the best of the market prices during months of December to May of each year.
Updating on the SJAP Beef operation 2011
·
|
At this moment, SJAP’s operation is highly seasonal until such time its beef cattle division will generate all year round revenue estimated to start from year 2012. Main reason for this, is that, Xining City has long winter began each year from November to April, and during which time most of the operational activities stopped, and in this respect SJAP’s operational activities are also restricted such that production of fertilizer is at half of its full capacity but rearing of cattle in house will be functioned as normal. Starting from mid-April onward, all SJAP operational activities will be normal, with the seedling and harvesting of pasture and crop in April and August respectively and the manufacturing of live-stock feed starting from August each year.
|
·
|
As of June 30, 2011 SJAP’s half yearly result shows the following performances:
|
There was 14,575.4 Tons of fertilizer manufactured at cost of average of RMB406.92 / Ton and sales of 13,402.44 Tons at an average of sale price at RMB948.99 / Ton.
There was 226.89 Tons of live-stock feed manufactured at cost of RMB426.86 / Ton and most of which were used in house to feed its own cattle at an internal sales price averaging at RMB669.85 / Ton.
Although as at July 15th, 2011 SJAP is housing over 860 heads of young cattle, and as at June 30, 2011, there was no accurate record of their daily growth rate being registered yet for all of them due to the unsettled conditions of the young cattle after they have been moved to a new environment, however recording of which is expecting to improve from August onward.
Inflation factors affecting our operation:
During the past six months of 2011, prices of building materials have gone up sharply on monthly basis yet primary produced food prices are rather normal varied and reflected mainly on supply and demand situation, although most of the value added food items did experience consistent price rises due mainly to the increase of associated rentals, logistics and labor cost etc.
Since part of the revenue of the Company is generated from the supply of consulting and servicing contracts on farm building and developments such that any inflation factors on the building materials and plants and equipment will have an impact on its earnings during 2011.
45
Taxes
There was no income tax payable in both of the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2011.
Under new tax legislation of China beginning January 2008, the agriculture, dairy and fishery sectors are exempted from enterprise income taxes.
However result from the application of the Joint Venture Company of the Enping Fish Farm, we received a notice from the tax department that only 50% of its income tax would exempted regulated by the local Province Government. In this respect we are appealing this out-come with the local Province Government.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2011, we had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $856,395, (see notes to the consolidated account), and our working capital as of June 30, 2011 was at $66,977,301.
As of June 30, 2011, our total long term debts are as follows:
Contractual
Obligations
|
Less than
1 year
|
1-3 years
|
3-5
years
|
More
than 5 years
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
Long Term Bank Debts
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
Cash provided by operating activities from continuing operation totaled $7,968,407 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. This compares with cash used in operating activities from continuing operations totaled $2,282,935 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in cash flows from operations primarily resulted from net cash provided by net income for the year after adjustments of non- cash items.
Cash used in investing activities from continuing operations totaled ($5,859,059) for the six months ended June 30, 2011.This compares with cash used in investing activities from continuing operations totaled ($2,033,855) for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in cash used in investing activities primarily resulted from the purchase of property and equipment of $6,828, acquisition land use rights of $4,102,453, investment in unconsolidated investee of $1,256,555 and payment for construction in progress of $493,223 as compared with from the purchase of property and equipment of $ 1,002,665, acquisition of land use rights of $371,405, investment in unconsolidated investee of $600,533 and payment for construction in progress of $371,405 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Cash used in financing activities from continuing operations totaled $3,905 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. This compares with cash used in financing activities from continuing operations totaled $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Cash provided by operating activities from discontinued operation totaled $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. This compares with cash used in operating activities from discontinued operations totaled $5,898,160 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease in cash flows from operations primarily resulted from there is no cash generated from the discontinued operations of Dairy Production Division since January 1, 2011.
.
Cash used in investing activities from discontinued operation totaled $3,137,885 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. This compares with cash used in investing activities totaled $4,693,689 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 due to withdrawal of cash and cash equivalents of discontinued dairy segment of $3,137,885 in 2011 Q1 and resulting the decrease in cash used in investing activities by $1,555,804
Cash provided by financing activities from discontinued operation totaled $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. This compares with cash provided by financing activities from discontinued operations totaled $3,154,338 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
46
Bank Loan
As of June 30, 2011, there is no long term loan debt guaranteed by a third party as shown in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Related Parties Transactions
In addition to the transactions and balances as disclosed elsewhere in these consolidated financial statements, during the quarter, the Company had the significant related party transaction as detailed in the notes to consolidated financial statements above.
OTHER SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTIONS THAT AFFECT CASH/LIQUIDITY:
As of June 30, 2011, we had no other significant transactions that may affect our cash / Liquidity other than the seasonal variation effects and Inflation factors mentioned earlier and the effects stated herein: “The Company considers all highly liquid securities with original maturities of three months or less when acquired to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents kept with financial institutions in People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) are not insured or otherwise protected. Should any of those institutions holding the Company’s cash become insolvent, or the Company is unable to withdraw funds for any reason, the Company could lose the cash on deposit on that institution.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("US GAAP").
Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The information included in this interim report should be read in conjunction with the information included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of SIAF, its subsidiaries CA, CS, CH, TRW, MEIJI, HJST, ZX, PMH. HYT and APWAM and its variable interest entity SJAP. All material inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. HYT and ZX was derecognized as subsidiaries since 1 January 2011 and PMH was dissolved on January 28, 2011.
SIAF, CA, CS, CH, TRW, MEIJI, JHST, APWAM and SJAP are hereafter referred to as (“the Company”).
BUSINESS COMBINATION
The Company adopted the accounting pronouncements relating to business combination (primarily contained in ASC Topic 805 “Business Combinations”), including assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contingencies. These pronouncements established principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquisition as well as provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. In addition, these pronouncements eliminate the distinction between contractual and non-contractual contingencies, including the initial recognition and measurement criteria and require an acquirer to develop a systematic and rational basis for subsequently measuring and accounting for acquired contingencies depending on their nature. Our adoption of these pronouncements will have an impact on the manner in which we account for any future acquisitions.
47
NON - CONTROLLING INTEREST IN CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Company adopted the accounting pronouncement on non-controlling interests in consolidated financial statements, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This guidance is primarily contained in ASC Topic “Consolidation”. It clarifies that a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated financial statements. The adoption of this standard has not had material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make assumptions and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods covered thereby. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Judgments and estimates of uncertainties are required in applying the Company’s accounting policies in certain areas. The following are some of the areas requiring significant judgments and estimates: determinations of the useful lives of assets, estimates of allowances for doubtful accounts, cash flow and valuation assumptions in performing asset impairment tests of long-lived assets, estimates of the realizability of deferred tax assets and inventory reserves.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company’s revenue recognition policies are in compliance with ASC Topic 605. Sales revenue is recognized when all of the following have occurred: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, (iii) the price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) the ability to collect is reasonably assured. These criteria are generally satisfied at the time of shipment when risk of loss and title passes to the customer. License fee income is recognized on the accrual basis in accordance with the underlying agreements.
Revenues from the Company's development services contract are performed under fixed-price contracts. Revenues under long-term contracts are accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 605, Revenue Recognition ("ASC 605"). Under the percentage-of-completion method, the Company estimates profit as the difference between total estimated revenue and total estimated cost of a contract and recognizes that profit over the contract term. The percent of cost incurred determines the amount of revenue to be recognized. Payment terms are generally defined by the installation contract and as a result may not match the timing of the costs incurred by the Company and the related recognition of revenue. Such differences are recorded as either costs or estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts or billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts. The Company determines a customer’s credit worthiness at the time an order is accepted. Sudden and unexpected changes in a customer’s financial condition could put recoverability at risk.
The percentage of completion method requires the ability to estimate several factors, including the ability of the customer to meet its obligations under the contract, including the payment of amounts when due. If we determine that collectability is not assured, we will defer revenue recognition and use methods of accounting for the contract such as completed contract method until such time we determine that collectability is reasonably assured or through the completion of the project.
For fixed-price contracts, the Company uses the ratio of cost incurred to date on the contract (excluding uninstalled direct materials) to management's estimate of the contract's total cost, to determine the percentage of completion on each contract. This method is used as management considers expended costs to be the best available measure of progression of these contracts. Contract cost includes all direct material, subcontract and labor costs and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as supplies, tool repairs and depreciation. The Company accounts for maintenance and repair services under the guidance of ASC 605 as the services provided relate to construction work. Contract costs incurred to date and expected total contract costs are continuously monitored during the term of the contract. Changes in job performance, job conditions, job conditions, and estimated profitability arising from contract penalty, change orders and final contract settlements may result in revisions to the estimated profitability during the contract. These changes, which include contracts with estimated costs in excess of estimated revenues, are recognized in contract costs in the period in which the revisions are determined. Profit incentives are included in revenues when their realization is reasonably assured. At the point the Company anticipates a loss on a contract, the Company estimates the ultimate loss through completion and recognizes that loss in the period in which the possible loss was identified.
The Company will not provide warranties to customers on a basis customary to the industry; however, the customers can claim warranty directly from product manufacturers. Historically, the Company has no warranty claims history in the past.
The Company’s fishery development consultancy services revenue are recognized when the relevant service are rendered, and are subject to Chinese business tax at a rate of 0% of the gross fishery development con tract service income approved by the Chinese local government.
48
COST OF GOODS SOLD
Cost of goods sold consists primarily of direct and indirect cost of cultivation and cost of development contract.
SHIPPING AND HANDLING
Shipping and handling costs related to cost of goods sold are included in general and administrative expenses which totaled $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
ADVERTISING
Advertising costs are included in general and administrative expenses which totaled $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The reporting currency of the Company is the U.S. dollars. The functional currency of the Company is the Chinese Renminbi (RMB).
For those entities whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollars, all assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date; shareholders’ equity is translated at historical rates and items in the statements of income and of cash flows are translated at the average rate for the period. Because cash flows are translated based on the average translation rate, amounts related to assets and liabilities reported in the statements of cash flows will not necessarily agree with changes in the corresponding balances in the balance sheets. Translation adjustments resulting from this process are included in accumulated other comprehensive income in the statements of shareholders’ equity. Transaction gains and losses that arise from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency are included in the statements of income and comprehensive income as incurred.
Accumulated other comprehensive income in the consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity amounted to $1,234,698 as of June 30, 2011 and $3,804,116 as of December 31, 2010. The balance sheet amounts with the exception of equity as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were translated at RMB6.47 to $1.00 and RMB6.62 to $1.00, respectively. The average translation rates applied to the statements of income and comprehensive income and of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 were RMB6.51 to $1.00 and RMB6.81 to $1.00, respectively.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
The Company considers all highly liquid securities with original maturities of three months or less when acquired to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents kept with financial institutions in People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) are not insured or otherwise protected. Should any of those institutions holding the Company’s cash become insolvent, or the Company is unable to withdraw funds for any reason, the Company could lose the cash on deposit on that institution.
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses on accounts receivable. Management reviews the composition of accounts receivable and analyzes historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment patterns to evaluate the adequacy of these reserves. Reserves are recorded primarily on a specific identification basis.
The standard credit period of the majority of the Company’s clientele is three months. The collection period over 1 year is classified as long term accounts receivable. Management evaluates the collectability of the receivables at least quarterly. Provision for doubtful accounts as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are $0.
INVENTORIES
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (determined on a weighted average basis) and net realizable value.
Costs incurred in bringing each product to its location and conditions are accounted for as follows:
·
|
raw materials – purchase cost on a weighted average basis;
|
·
|
manufactured finished goods and work-in-progress – cost of direct materials and labor and a proportion of manufacturing overhead based on normal operation capacity but excluding borrowing costs; and
|
·
|
retail and wholesale merchandise finished goods – purchase cost on a weighted average basis.
|
Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale.
49
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses. Such costs include the cost of replacing parts that are eligible for capitalization when the cost of replacing the parts is incurred. Similarly, when each major inspection is performed, its cost is recognized in the carrying amount of the property and equipment as a replacement only if it is eligible for capitalization. The assets’ residual values, useful lives and depreciation methods are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each financial year-end.
Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets.
Milk cows
|
10 years
|
Plant and machinery
|
5 - 10 years
|
Structure and leasehold improvements
|
10 - 20 years
|
Mature seeds
|
20 years
|
Furniture and equipment
|
2.5 - 10 years
|
Motor vehicles
|
5 -10 years
|
An item of property and equipment is removed from the accounts upon disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected to arise from the continued use of the asset. Any gain or loss arising on disposal of the asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the item) is included in the consolidated statements of income in the period the item is disposed.
GOODWILL
Goodwill is an asset representing the fair economic benefits arising from other assets acquired in a business combination that are not individually identified and separately recognized. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis at the end of the company’s fiscal year, or when impairment indicators arise. The Company uses a fair-value-based approach to test for impairment at the level of each reporting unit. The Company directly acquired MEIJI which is engaged in Hu Plantation. As a result of this acquisition, the Company recorded goodwill in the amount of $724,940. This goodwill represents the fair value of the assets acquired in these acquisitions over the cost of the assets acquired.
PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGIES
The Company has determined that technological feasibility is established at the time a working model of products is completed. A master license of stock feed manufacturing technology was acquired and the costs of acquisition are capitalized as proprietary technologies when technological feasibility has been established. Proprietary technologies are intangible assets of finite lives. Proprietary technologies are amortized using the straight line method over their estimated lives of 25 years. Management evaluates the recoverability of proprietary technologies on an annual basis of the end of the company’s fiscal year, or when impairment indicators arise. As required by ASC Topic 350 “Intangible – Goodwill and Other”, the Company uses a fair-value-based approach to test for impairment.
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
Construction in progress represents direct costs of construction as well as acquisition and design fees incurred. Capitalization of these costs ceases and the construction in progress is transferred to property and equipment when substantially all the activities necessary to prepare the assets for their intended use are completed. No depreciation is provided until construction is completed and the asset is ready for its intended use.
LAND USE RIGHTS
Land use rights represent acquisition of land use right rights of agriculture land from farmers and are amortized on the straight line basis over their respective lease periods. The lease period of agriculture land is in the range from 30 years to 60 years. Land use rights purchase prices were determined in accordance with the 2007 PRC Government’s minimum lease payments of agriculture land and mutually agreed between the company and the vendors.
50
VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITY
An entity (investee) in which the investor has obtained less than a majority-owned interest, according to the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). A variable interest entity (VIE) is subject to consolidation if A VIE is an entity meeting one of the following three criteria as elaborated in ASC Topic 810-10, Consolidation.
|
a)
|
equity-at-risk is not sufficient to support the entity's activities
|
|
b)
|
As a group, the equity-at-risk holders cannot control the entity; or
|
|
c)
|
The economics do not coincide with the voting interest
|
If a firm is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, the holdings must be disclosed on the balance sheet. The primary beneficiary is defined as the person or company with the majority of variable interests
TREASURY STOCK
Treasury stock consists of a Company’s own stock which has been issued, subsequently reacquired by the Company, and not yet reissued or canceled. Treasury stock does not reduce the number of shares issued but does not reduce the number of shares outstanding, as well as total stockholders’ equity. These shares are not eligible to receive cash dividends. Treasury stock may be presented as an asset if adequately disclosed (ASC 505-30-30). Accounting for excesses and deficiencies on treasury stock transactions is governed by ASC 505-30-30.
State laws and federal agencies closely regulate transactions involving a company’s own capital stock, so the purchase of treasury shares must have a legitimate purpose. Some of the most common reasons for purchasing treasury shares are as follows:
(i)
|
to meet additional stock needs for various reasons, including newly implemented stock option plans, stock for convertible bonds or convertible preferred stock, or a stock dividend.
|
(ii)
|
to eliminate the ownerships interests of a stockholder.
|
(iii)
|
to increase the market price of the stock that returns capital to shareholders.
|
(iv)
|
to potentially increase earnings per share of the stock by decreasing the shares outstanding on the same earnings.
|
(v)
|
to make more shares available for a merger.
|
The cost method of accounting for treasury stock shares is adopted. The purchase of treasury stock is treated as a temporary reduction in shareholders equity in view of the expectation to reissue the shares instead of retiring them. When the Company reissues the treasury shares, the temporary account is eliminated. The cost of treasury stock shares reacquired is charged to a contra account, in this case a contra equity account that reduces the stockholder equity balance. The purchase of treasury shares leaves the common stock and contributed balances intact.
INCOME TAXES
The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of ASC Topic 740 "Accounting for Income Taxes". Under ASC Topic 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse.
The provision for income tax is based on the results for the year as adjusted for items, which are non-assessable or disallowed. It is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. Deferred tax is accounted for using the balance sheet liability method in respect of temporary differences arising from differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the corresponding tax basis used in the computation of assessable tax profit. In principle, deferred tax liabilities are recognized for all taxable temporary differences, and deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilized.
Deferred income taxes are calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period when the asset is realized or the liability is settled. Deferred tax is charged or credited in the income statement, except when it related to items credited or charged directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also dealt with in equity. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the Company intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.
ASC Topic 740 also prescribes a more-likely-than-not threshold for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken, or expected to be taken, in a tax return. ASC Topic 740 also provides guidance related to, among other things, classification, accounting for interest and penalties associated with tax positions, and disclosure requirements. Any interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits will be recorded in tax expense.
51
POLITICAL AND BUSINESS RISK
The Company's operations are carried out in the PRC. Accordingly, the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations may be influenced by the political, economic and legal environment in the PRC, and by the general state of the PRC's economy. The Company's operations in the PRC are subject to specific considerations and significant risks not typically associated with companies in North America and Western Europe. The Company's results may be adversely affected by changes in governmental policies with respect to laws and regulations, anti-inflationary measures, currency conversion and remittance abroad, and rates and methods of taxation, among other thing.
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
In accordance with ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment”, long-lived assets to be held and used are analyzed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. The Company reviews the carrying amount of its long-lived assets, including intangibles, for impairment, each reporting period. An asset is considered impaired when estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset. In the event the carrying amount of such asset is considered not recoverable, the asset is adjusted to its fair value. Fair value is generally determined based on discounted future cash flow. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company determined no impairment charges were necessary.
EARNINGS PER SHARE
As prescribed in ASC Topic 260 “Earnings per Share”, Basic Earnings per Share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common stock shares outstanding during the year. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common stock shares outstanding during the year plus potential dilutive instruments such as stock options and warrants. The effect of stock options on diluted EPS is determined through the application of the treasury stock method, whereby proceeds received by the Company based on assumed exercises are hypothetically used to repurchase the Company’s common stock at the average market price during the period.
For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, basic earnings (loss) per share from continuing and discontinued operations attributable to Sino Agro Food, Inc. and subsidiaries common stockholders amount to $0.05 and $(0.01), respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, basic earnings (loss) per share from continuing and discontinued operations attributable to Sino Agro Food, Inc. and subsidiaries common stockholders amount to $0.25 and $(0.07), respectively.
For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing and discontinued operations attributable to Sino Agro Food, Inc. and subsidiaries common stockholders amount to $0.05 and $(0.01), respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing and discontinued operations attributable to Sino Agro Food, Inc. and subsidiaries common stockholders amount to $0.22 and $(0.07), respectively.
For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, basic earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations attributable to Sino Agro Food, Inc. and subsidiaries common stockholders amount to $0.05 and $(0.04), respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, basic earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations attributable to Sino Agro Food, Inc. and subsidiaries common stockholders amount to $0.07 and $(0.13), respectively.
For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations attributable to Sino Agro Food, Inc. and subsidiaries common stockholders amount to $0.05 and $(0.04), respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations attributable to Sino Agro Food, Inc. and subsidiaries common stockholders amount to $0.06 and $(0.13), respectively.
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
ASC Topic 220 “Comprehensive Income” establishes standards for reporting and displaying comprehensive income and its components in financial statements. Comprehensive income is defined as the change in stockholders’ equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. The comprehensive income for all periods presented includes both the reported net income and net change in cumulative translation adjustments.
RETIREMENT BENEFIT COSTS
PRC state managed retirement benefit programs are defined contribution plans and the payments to the plans are charged as expenses when employees have rendered service entitling them to the contribution.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company adopts both ASC Topic 718, “Compensation - Stock Compensation” and ASC Topic 505-50,“Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees” using the fair value method. Under ASC Topic 718 and ASC Topic 505-50, stock compensation expenses is measured at the grant date on the value of the option or restricted stock and is recognized as expenses, less expected forfeitures, over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period.
52
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:-
Level 1
|
Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
|
Level 2
|
Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
|
Level 3
|
Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.
|
The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.
The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or a non-recurring basis, consequently, the Company did not have any fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010, nor gains or losses are reported in the statements of income and comprehensive income that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities still held as of the reporting date for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2011 or June 30, 2010.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
The Company does not expect any recent accounting pronouncements to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In January 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-01 Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash. The amendments in this Update clarify that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying Topics 505 and 260 (Equity and Earnings Per Share). The amendments in this update are effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December.
In January 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-02 regarding accounting and reporting for decreases in ownership of a subsidiary. Under this guidance, an entity is required to deconsolidate a subsidiary when the entity ceases to have a controlling financial interest in the subsidiary. Upon deconsolidation of a subsidiary, and entity recognizes a gain or loss on the transaction and measures any retained investment in the subsidiary at fair value. In contrast, an entity is required to account for a decrease in its ownership interest of a subsidiary that does not result in a change of control of the subsidiary as an equity transaction. This ASU clarifies the scope of the decrease in ownership provisions, and expands the disclosures about the deconsolidation of a subsidiary or de-recognition of a group of assets. This ASU is effective for beginning in the first interim or annual reporting period ending on or after December 31, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements In January 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-02 – Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary – a Scope Clarification. The amendments in this Update affect accounting and reporting by an entity that experiences a decrease in ownership in a subsidiary that is a business or nonprofit activity. The amendments also affect accounting and reporting by an entity that exchanges a group of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity for an equity interest in another entity. The amendments in this update are effective beginning in the period that an entity adopts SFAS No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – An Amendment of ARB No. 51.” If an entity has previously adopted SFAS No. 160 as of the date the amendments in this update are included in the Accounting Standards Codification, the amendments in this update are effective beginning in the first interim or annual reporting period ending on or after December 15, 2009. The amendments in this update should be applied retrospectively to the first period that an entity adopted SFAS No. 160. The Company adopted this standard and has determined the standard does not have material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06 – Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that requires new disclosure as follows: 1) Transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2. A reporting entity should disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. 2) Activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. In the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements (that is, on a gross basis rather than as one net number). This update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that clarify existing disclosures as follows: 1) Level of disaggregation. A reporting entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities. A class is often a subset of assets or liabilities within a line item in the statement of financial position. A reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities. 2) Disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. A reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. Those disclosures are required for fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3.The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU, however, the Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
53
In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-09, “Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements,” or ASU 2010-09. ASU 2010-09 primarily rescinds the requirement that, for listed companies, financial statements clearly disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. Subsequent events must still be evaluated through the date of financial statement issuance; however, the disclosure requirement has been removed to avoid conflicts with other SEC guidelines. ASU 2010-09 was effective immediately upon issuance and was adopted in February 2010.
In April 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-13,"Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades," or ASU 2010-13. ASU 2010-13 provides amendments to Topic 718 to clarify that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in currency of a market in which a substantial porting of the entity's equity securities trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-17 to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update 2010-17, "Revenue Recognition-Milestone Method (Topic 605): Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition" or ASU 2010-17. This Update provides guidance on the recognition of revenue under the milestone method, which allows a vendor to adopt an accounting policy to recognize all of the arrangement consideration that is contingent on the achievement of a substantive milestone (milestone consideration) in the period the milestone is achieved. The pronouncements effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-17 does not have any significant impacts on the consolidated financial statements.
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, “Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.” This update amends codification topic 310 on receivables to improve the disclosures that an entity provides about the credit quality of its financing receivables and the related allowance for credit losses. As a result of these amendments, an entity is required to disaggregate by portfolio segment or class certain existing disclosures and provide certain new disclosures about its financing receivables and related allowance for credit losses. This guidance is being phased in, with the new disclosure requirements for period end balances effective as of December 31, 2010, and the new disclosure requirements for activity during the reporting period are effective March 31, 2011. The troubled debt restructuring disclosures in this ASU have been delayed by ASU 2011-01 “Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20,” which was issued in January 2011.
In December 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-28 which amend “Intangibles- Goodwill and Other” (Topic 350). The ASU modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting entities, they are required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. An entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing guidance in Topic 350, which requires that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances changes that would more likely than not reduce the faire value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. ASU 2010-28 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU; however, the Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-29 which address diversity in practice about the interpretation of the pro forma revenue and earnings disclosure requirements for business combinations (Topic 805). This ASU specifies that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. This ASU also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures under Topic 805 to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. ASU 2010-29 is effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU and expected the adoption of this ASU will have an impact on its future business combinations.
54
N/A.
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We conducted an evaluation (the “Evaluation”), under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Acting Chief Financial Officer (“Acting CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (“Disclosure Controls”) as of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act. Based on this Evaluation, our CEO and Acting CFO concluded that our Disclosure Controls were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Changes in Internal Controls
We have also evaluated our internal controls for financial reporting, and there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter of fiscal three months ended June 30, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our CEO and Acting CFO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls and internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management or board override of the control.
The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
The Company is currently not a party to any pending legal proceedings and no such action by or to the best of its knowledge, against the Company has been threatened.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
N/A.
55
Item 2. Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
The Company entered into several agreements with third parties to settle debts by issuance of the Company’s common stock. The shares issued by the Company were valued at the trading price of the stock on the date the shares were issued. Any excess of the fair value of the shares over the carrying cost of the debt has been reported as a gain (loss) on the extinguishment of debts has been charged to operation during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
N/A.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
N/A.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
56
Item 6. Exhibits.
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
31.1
|
|
Certification by Lee Yip Kun Solomon, the Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Sino Agro Food, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1
|
|
Certification by Lee Yip Kun Solomon, the Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Sino Agro Food, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
57
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SINO AGRO FOOD, INC.
|
|||
August 22, 2011
|
By:
|
/s/ LEE YIP KUN SOLOMON
|
|
Lee Yip Kun Solomon
|
|||
Chief Executive Officer
|
|||
(Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
Principal Accounting Officer)
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
August 22, 2011
|
By:
|
/s/ LEE YIP KUN SOLOMON
|
|
|
Lee Yip Kun Solomon
Chief Executive Officer, Director
(Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
Principal Accounting Officer)
|
August 22, 2011
|
By:
|
/s/ TAN POAY TEIK
|
|
|
Tan Poay Teik
Chief Officer, Marketing
|
August 22, 2011
|
By:
|
/s/ CHEN BOR HANN
|
|
|
Chen Bor Hann
Corporate Secretary
|
58