SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc. - Annual Report: 2019 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
☒ |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019
OR
☐ |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-55617
SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland |
|
46-1722812 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
10 Terrace Rd,
Ladera Ranch, California 92694
(Address of principal executive offices)
(877) 327-3485
(Registrant’s telephone number)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class |
Trading Symbol(s) |
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
None |
None |
None |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer |
☐ |
|
Accelerated Filer |
☐ |
Non-Accelerated Filer |
☒ |
|
Smaller reporting company |
☒ |
|
|
|
Emerging growth company |
☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial account standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
There is currently no established public market for the registrant’s shares of common stock. Based on the $10.66 offering price of the Class A shares and the Class T shares in effect on June 30, 2019, the aggregate market value of the stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on such date was approximately $624,707,362.
As of March 25, 2020, there were 51,715,495 outstanding shares of Class A common stock and 7,749,939 outstanding shares of Class T common stock of the registrant.
Documents Incorporated by Reference:
The registrant incorporates by reference in Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) of this Form 10-K portions of its Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page No. |
|
|
||
ITEM 1. |
|
2 |
|
ITEM 1A. |
|
8 |
|
ITEM 1B. |
|
32 |
|
ITEM 2. |
|
32 |
|
ITEM 3. |
|
35 |
|
ITEM 4. |
|
35 |
|
|
|
||
ITEM 5. |
|
36 |
|
ITEM 6. |
|
44 |
|
ITEM 7. |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
|
45 |
ITEM 7A. |
|
64 |
|
ITEM 8. |
|
65 |
|
ITEM 9. |
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
|
65 |
ITEM 9A. |
|
66 |
|
ITEM 9B. |
|
66 |
|
|
|
||
ITEM 10. |
|
67 |
|
ITEM 11. |
|
67 |
|
ITEM 12. |
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
|
67 |
ITEM 13. |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
|
67 |
ITEM 14. |
|
67 |
|
|
|
||
ITEM 15. |
|
68 |
|
ITEM 16. |
|
68 |
|
|
|
||
|
F-1 |
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained in this Form 10-K of SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc., other than historical facts, may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We intend for all such forward-looking statements to be covered by the applicable safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, as applicable. Such statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies, and prospects and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including known and unknown risks, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Therefore, such statements are not intended to be a guarantee of our performance in future periods. Such forward-looking statements can generally be identified by our use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “seek,” “continue,” or other similar words. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date this report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We cannot guarantee the accuracy of any such forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K, and we do not intend to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Any such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors and are based on a number of assumptions involving judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive, and market conditions, including without limitation changes in the political and economic climate, economic conditions and fiscal imbalances in the United States, and other major developments, including wars, natural disasters, epidemics and pandemics, including the outbreak of novel coronavirus (COVID-19), military actions, and terrorist attacks. The occurrence or severity of any such event or circumstance is difficult or impossible to predict accurately. To the extent that our assumptions differ from actual results, our ability to realize the plans, strategies and prospects contemplated by such forward-looking statements, including our ability to generate positive cash flow from operations and provide distributions to stockholders, and our ability to find suitable investment properties, may be significantly hindered.
For further information regarding risks and uncertainties associated with our business, and important factors that could cause our actual results to vary materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements, please refer to the factors listed and described under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the “Risk Factors” sections of the documents we file from time to time with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including, but not limited to, this report and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, copies of which may be obtained from our website at www.strategicreit.com.
1
PART I
ITEM 1. |
BUSINESS |
Corporate History
SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc. (f/k/a Strategic Storage Trust II, Inc.), a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), is a self-managed and fully-integrated self storage real estate investment trust (“REIT”), formed on January 8, 2013 under the Maryland General Corporation Law. The Company’s year-end is December 31. As used in this report, “we,” “us,” “our,” and “Company” refer to SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc. and each of our subsidiaries.
Recent Developments
On June 28, 2019, we and our operating partnership, SmartStop OP, L.P. (f/k/a Strategic Storage Operating Partnership II, L.P.) (our “Operating Partnership”), and SmartStop TRS, Inc. (f/k/a Strategic Storage TRS II, Inc.) (the “TRS”) entered into a series of transactions, agreements, and amendments to our existing agreements and arrangements (such agreements and amendments hereinafter referred to collectively as the “Self Administration Transaction”), with SmartStop Asset Management LLC, our former sponsor (“SAM”) and SmartStop OP Holdings, LLC (“SS OP Holdings”), a subsidiary of SAM, pursuant to which, effective June 28, 2019, we acquired the self storage advisory, asset management and property management businesses and Tenant Programs (as defined in Note 10) joint venture interests of SAM (the “Self Storage Platform”), along with certain other assets of SAM. As a result of the Self Administration Transaction, SAM is no longer our sponsor, and the special limited partnership interest and limited partnership interest it held in our Operating Partnership through our Former External Advisor (defined below) have been redeemed. Additionally, we are now self-managed and succeed to the advisory, asset management and property management businesses and certain joint ventures previously in place for us, Strategic Storage Trust IV, Inc. (“SST IV”), a public non-traded REIT, and Strategic Storage Growth Trust II, Inc. (“SSGT II”) (collectively with SST IV, the “Managed REITs”), a private non-traded REIT, and now as a sponsor to the Managed REITs have the internal capability to originate, structure and manage additional investment products (the “Managed REIT Platform”) which would be sponsored by SmartStop REIT Advisors, LLC (“SRA”), our indirect subsidiary. As a result of the Self Administration Transaction, we indirectly own 100% of the membership interests in Strategic Storage Advisor II, LLC (our “Former External Advisor”) and each of Strategic Storage Property Management II, LLC and SS Growth Property Management, LLC (together, our “Former External Property Managers”). See Note 4 – Self Administration Transaction, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report, for additional information.
Prior to the Self Administration Transaction, our Former External Advisor was responsible for managing our affairs on a day-to-day basis and identifying and making acquisitions and investments on our behalf under the terms of an advisory agreement and our properties were previously managed by our Former External Property Managers pursuant to property management agreements. However, as a result of the Self Administration Transaction, we acquired approximately 350 self storage professionals and now perform such services on our own behalf. Please see Note 10 – Related Party Transactions, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report, for additional information.
Offering Related
Our Articles of Amendment and Restatement, as amended and supplemented, authorize 350,000,000 shares of Class A common stock, $0.001 par value per share (the “Class A Shares”) and 350,000,000 shares of Class T common stock, $0.001 par value per share (the “Class T Shares”) and 200,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.001 per share. In our initial public offering, which commenced on January 10, 2014 and ended on January 9, 2017, we offered a maximum of $1.0 billion in common shares for sale to the public (the “Primary Offering”) and $95.0 million in common shares for sale pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan (collectively, the “Offering”) and sold approximately 48.4 million Class A Shares and approximately 7.3 million Class T Shares for approximately $493 million and $73 million respectively. On November 30, 2016, prior to the termination of our Offering, we filed with the SEC a Registration Statement on Form S-3, which registered up to an additional $100.9 million in shares under our distribution reinvestment plan (our “DRP Offering”). The DRP Offering may be terminated at any time upon 10 days’ prior written notice to stockholders. As of December 31, 2019, we had sold approximately 4.0 million Class A Shares and approximately 0.6 million Class T Shares for approximately $41.7 million and $6.4 million, respectively, in our DRP Offering.
2
We invested the net proceeds from our Offering primarily in self storage facilities. As of December 31, 2019, we owned 111 operating self storage facilities and one facility under development located in 17 states (Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, Texas and Washington) and Ontario, Canada (the Greater Toronto Area).
On June 26, 2019, our board of directors, upon recommendation of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, approved an estimated value per share of our common stock of $10.66 for our Class A Shares and Class T Shares based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities, or net asset value, divided by the number of shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis, calculated as of March 31, 2019.
Accordingly, beginning in July 2019, shares sold pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan are being sold at the estimated value per share of $10.66 for both Class A Shares and Class T Shares.
On October 29, 2019 (the “Commitment Date”), we entered into a preferred stock purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Extra Space Storage LP (the “Investor”), a subsidiary of Extra Space Storage Inc. (NYSE: EXR), pursuant to which the Investor committed to purchase up to $200 million in shares (the aggregate shares to be purchased, the “Preferred Shares”) of our new Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A Convertible Preferred Stock”), in one or more closings (each, a “Closing,” and collectively, the “Closings”). The initial closing (the “Initial Closing”) in the amount of $150 million occurred on the Commitment Date. The Investor has committed to purchase up to an additional $50 million, at our option, within 12 months following the Initial Closing, subject to certain limitations. We will pay the Investor a fee of 0.25% per annum on the remaining commitment amount until drawn, or the 12-month anniversary of the Initial Closing.
In connection with the Initial Closing, we filed articles supplementary to our Second Articles of Amendment and Restatement, which classified and designated 200,000 authorized but unissued shares of Preferred Stock as the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. The shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock rank senior to all other shares of our capital stock, including our common stock, with respect to rights to receive dividends and to participate in distributions or payments upon any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company. Dividends payable on each share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock will initially be equal to a rate of 6.25% per annum. If the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock has not been redeemed on or prior to the fifth anniversary date of the Initial Closing, the dividend rate will increase an additional 0.75% per annum each year thereafter to a maximum of 9.0% per annum until the tenth anniversary of the Initial Closing, at which time the dividend rate shall increase 0.75% per annum each year thereafter until the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock is redeemed or repurchased in full.
Other Corporate History
Our Operating Partnership owns, directly or indirectly through one or more special purpose entities, all of the self storage properties that we acquire. As of December 31, 2019, we owned approximately 86.7% of the common units of limited partnership interests of our Operating Partnership. The remaining approximately 13.3% of the common units are owned indirectly by SAM and affiliates of our Dealer Manager. As the sole general partner of our Operating Partnership, we have the exclusive power to manage and conduct the business of our Operating Partnership. We conduct certain activities through our TRS, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of our Operating Partnership.
On October 1, 2018, we, our Operating Partnership, and SST II Growth Acquisition, LLC, our wholly-owned subsidiary (“Merger Sub”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “SSGT Merger Agreement”) with Strategic Storage Growth Trust, Inc. (“SSGT”), a non-traded REIT then sponsored by SAM, and SS Growth Operating Partnership, L.P. (“SSGT OP”). Pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, on January 24, 2019: (i) we acquired SSGT by way of a merger of SSGT with and into Merger Sub, with Merger Sub being the surviving entity (the “SSGT REIT Merger”); and (ii) immediately after the SSGT REIT Merger, SSGT OP merged with and into our Operating Partnership, with the Operating Partnership continuing as the surviving entity and remaining a subsidiary of the Company (the “SSGT Partnership Merger” and, together with the SSGT REIT Merger, the “SSGT Mergers”). SSGT was a REIT focused on opportunistic self storage properties, including development, and lease-up properties. See Note 3, Real Estate Facilities—Merger with Strategic Storage Growth Trust, Inc., for additional information related to the SSGT Mergers.
3
Industry and Competition
“Self storage” refers to properties that offer do-it-yourself, month-to-month storage unit rental for personal or business use. Self storage offers a cost-effective and flexible storage alternative. Customers rent fully-enclosed spaces that can vary in size according to their specific needs. Customers typically have access to their storage units from 6:00AM – 10:00PM (365 days per year), and some of our facilities provide 24-hour access. Customers have responsibility for moving their items into and out of their units. Self storage unit sizes typically range from five feet by five feet to 10 feet by 30 feet.
Self storage provides a convenient way for individuals and businesses to store their possessions, whether due to a life change or simply because of a need for extra storage space. According to the 2020 Self Storage Almanac, self storage facilities generally have a customer mix of approximately 77% residential, 19% commercial, 2% military and 2% students. The mix of residential customers using a self storage property is determined by a property’s local demographics and often includes people who are looking to downsize their living space or who are not yet settled in a large home. The items that residential customers place in self storage properties range from furniture, household items and appliances to cars, boats and recreational vehicles. Commercial customers tend to include small business owners who require easy and frequent access to their goods, records or extra inventory, or storage for seasonal goods. Self storage properties provide an accessible storage alternative at a relatively low cost. Properties generally have on-site managers who supervise and run the day-to-day operations, providing customers with assistance as needed.
The six key demand drivers of self storage are: (1) population growth; (2) percentage of renter-occupied housing units; (3) average household size; (4) average household income; (5) supply constraints; and (6) economic growth. Customers choose a self storage property based largely on the convenience of the site to their home or business. Therefore, high-density, high-traffic population centers are ideal locations for a self storage property. A property’s perceived security and the general professionalism of the site managers and staff are also contributing factors to a site’s ability to secure rentals. Although most self storage units are leased to customers on a month-to-month basis, customers tend to continue their leases for extended periods of time. However, there are seasonal fluctuations in occupancy rates for self storage properties. Generally, there is increased leasing activity at self storage properties during the late spring and early summer months due to the higher number of people who relocate during this period.
As population densities have increased in the U.S., there has been an increase in self storage awareness and development. According to the 2020 Self Storage Almanac:
|
• |
at the end of 2019 there were 47,863 self storage facilities in the U.S.; |
|
• |
at the end of 2018 there were 45,547 self storage facilities in the U.S.; |
|
• |
at the end of 2017 there were 44,149 self storage facilities in the U.S.; and |
|
• |
at the end of 2016 there were 41,879 self storage facilities in the U.S. |
The growth in the industry has created more competition in various geographic regions and the extent of competition in a market area depends significantly on local market conditions. This has led to an increased emphasis on site location, property design, rental rates, innovation and functionality to accommodate local planning and zoning boards and to distinguish a facility from other offerings in the market. This is especially true for new sites slated for high-density population centers. We believe we will compete successfully on these bases. However, many of our competitors are larger and have substantially greater resources than we do. Such competitors may, among other possible advantages, be capable of paying higher prices for acquisitions and obtaining financing on better terms than us.
Self storage operators have placed increased emphasis on offering ancillary products that provide incremental revenues. Moving and packing supplies, such as locks and boxes, and the offering of other services, such as tenant insurance, protection or insurance plans, or other indemnity programs and truck rentals, help to increase revenues. As more sophisticated self storage operators continue to develop innovative products and services such as online rentals, 24-hour accessibility, digital gate access and unit security, climate-controlled storage, wine storage, customer-service call center access and after-hours storage, local operators may be increasingly unable to meet higher customer expectations, which could encourage consolidation in the industry.
4
We also believe that the self storage industry possesses attractive characteristics not found in other commercial real estate sectors, including the following:
|
• |
no reliance on a “single large customer” whose vacating can have a devastating impact on |
|
• |
no leasing commissions and/or tenant improvements; |
|
• |
relatively low capital expenditures; |
|
• |
brand names can be developed at local, regional and even national levels; |
|
• |
opportunity for a great deal of geographic diversification, which could enhance the stability and predictability of cash flows; and |
|
• |
the lowest loan default rate of any commercial property type. |
Industry Segments
Prior to the Self Administration Transaction on June 28, 2019, we internally evaluated all of our properties and interests therein as one industry segment and, accordingly, did not report segment information.
Subsequent to the Self Administration Transaction, we now operate in two reportable business segments: (i) self storage operations and (ii) our Managed REIT Platform business.
Management evaluates performance based upon net operating income (“NOI”). For our self storage operations, NOI is defined as leasing and related revenues, less property level operating expenses. NOI for the Company’s Managed REIT Platform business represents Managed REIT Platform revenues less Managed REIT Platform expenses.
General Business Strategies
We acquire, own and operate self storage facilities—including facilities owned by us as well as those owned by our Managed REITs. We are also continually looking for investment opportunities to grow our business in a way that achieves our investment objectives.
Operational
As an operating business, self storage requires a much greater focus on strategic planning and tactical operation plans. Our in-house sales center allows us to centralize our sales efforts as we capture new business over the phone, email, web-based chat, and text mediums. As we have grown our portfolio of self storage facilities, we have been able to consolidate and streamline a number of aspects of our operations through economies of scale. For example, our size and geographic diversification, as well as institution of a blanket property and casualty insurance program over all properties owned or managed by us nationwide, reduces our total insurance costs per property. We also utilize our digital marketing breadth and expertise which allows us to acquire customers efficiently by leveraging our portfolio size and technological proficiency. To the extent we acquired facilities in clusters within geographic regions, we see property management efficiencies resulting in reduction of personnel and other administrative costs.
5
Investment Objectives
We focus on investing in self storage facilities and related self storage real estate investments that are expected to support sustainable stockholder distributions over the long term. Our primary investment objectives are to: (1) invest in real property in a manner that allows us to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes; (2) provide regular cash distributions to our stockholders; (3) preserve and protect our stockholders’ invested capital; (4) achieve appreciation in the value of our properties over the long term; and (5) grow net cash flow from operations in order to provide sustainable cash distributions to our stockholders over the long-term. While acquisitions remain an important focus of ours, we expect to increase our focus on paying distributions to our stockholders and making capital investments into our assets and our business, as well as growing our Managed REIT Platform.
Joint Ventures
We may enter into joint ventures, general partnerships, co-tenancies and other participations with real estate developers, owners and others for the purpose of owning and leasing real properties. Among other reasons, we may want to acquire properties through a joint venture with third parties or affiliates in order to diversify our portfolio of properties in terms of geographic region or property type or to co-invest with one of our property management partners. Joint ventures may also allow us to acquire an interest in a property without requiring that we fund the entire purchase price. In addition, certain properties may be available to us only through joint ventures. For example, in connection with the Self Administration Transaction, we acquired a joint venture arrangement with SmartCentres pursuant to which we and SmartCentres work together to identify primarily self storage development opportunities in certain regions in Canada. In general, we participate in these opportunities through one of our Managed REITs on a 50/50 basis with SmartCentres. Historically, SmartCentres has been responsible for the development of the properties and we have been responsible for the operation of the facilities upon completion. For more information, please see Note 3—Real Estate Facilities—Joint Venture with SmartCentres.
To the extent possible and if approved by our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors, we will attempt to obtain a right of first refusal or option to buy if such venture partner elects to sell its interest in the joint venture entity or the property held by the joint venture. In the event that the venture partner were to elect to sell property held in any such joint venture, however, we may not have sufficient funds to exercise our right of first refusal to buy the venture partner’s interest in the property held by the joint venture. Entering into joint ventures with affiliates of our Advisor will result in certain conflicts of interest.
Liquidity Events
Subject to then-existing market conditions, and in the sole discretion of our board of directors, we intend to seek one or more of the following liquidity events within the next few years: (1) merge, reorganize or otherwise transfer our company or its assets to another entity with listed securities; (2) commence the sale of all of our properties and liquidate our company; (3) list our shares on a national securities exchange; or (4) otherwise create a liquidity event for our stockholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, there is no requirement for us to complete one of these liquidity events and our board of directors has the sole discretion to continue operations indefinitely if it deems such continuation to be in the best interests of our stockholders.
Government Regulations
Our business is subject to many laws and governmental regulations. Changes in these laws and regulations, or their interpretation by agencies and courts, occur frequently.
Americans with Disabilities Act
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or ADA, all public accommodations and commercial facilities are required to meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. These requirements became effective in 1992. Complying with the ADA requirements could require us to remove access barriers. Failing to comply could result in the imposition of fines by the federal government or an award of damages to private litigants. Although we intend to acquire properties that substantially comply with these requirements, we may incur additional costs to comply with the ADA. In addition, a number of additional federal, state and local laws may require us to modify any properties we purchase, or may restrict further renovations thereof, with respect to access by disabled persons. Additional legislation could impose financial obligations or restrictions with respect to access by disabled persons. Although we believe that these costs will not have a material adverse effect on us, if required changes involve a greater amount of expenditures than we currently anticipate, our ability to make distributions to our stockholders could be adversely affected.
6
Environmental Matters
Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be held liable for the costs of removing or remediating hazardous or toxic substances. These laws often impose clean-up responsibility and liability without regard to whether the owner or operator was responsible for, or even knew of, the presence of the hazardous or toxic substances. The costs of investigating, removing or remediating these substances may be substantial, and the presence of these substances may adversely affect our ability to rent units or sell the property, or to borrow using the property as collateral, and may expose us to liability resulting from any release of or exposure to these substances. If we arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances at another location, we may be liable for the costs of removing or remediating these substances at the disposal or treatment facility, whether or not the facility is owned or operated by us. We may be subject to common law claims by third parties based on damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from a site that we own or operate. Certain environmental laws also impose liability in connection with the handling of or exposure to asbestos containing materials, pursuant to which third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury associated with asbestos-containing materials and other hazardous or toxic substances.
Other Regulations
The properties we acquire will be subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as zoning and state and local fire and life safety requirements. Failure to comply with these requirements could result in the imposition of fines by governmental authorities or awards of damages to private litigants. We intend to acquire properties that are in material compliance with all such regulatory requirements. However, we cannot make assurances that these requirements will not be changed or that new requirements will not be imposed which would require significant unanticipated expenditures by us and could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Investment Allocation Policy
In the event that an investment opportunity becomes available, we, and, with respect to our Managed REITs, SRA, will determine whether to allocate such investment opportunity to us, SST IV, SSGT II, or other programs sponsored by SRA, based on the following factors:
|
• |
the investment objectives of each program; |
|
• |
the amount of funds available to each program; |
|
• |
the financial and investment characteristics of each program, including investment size, potential leverage, transaction structure and anticipated cash flows; |
|
• |
the strategic location of the investment in relationship to existing properties owned by each program; |
|
• |
the effect of the investment on the diversification of each program’s investments; and |
|
• |
the impact of the financial metrics of the investment, such as revenue per square foot, on each program. |
If, after consideration and analysis of these factors, the investment opportunity is suitable for us, SST IV, SSGT II, or another program sponsored by SRA, then:
|
• |
SST IV will have priority for all individual stabilized properties and portfolios of properties, at least a majority of which (based on allocated purchase price) are stabilized, with aggregate purchase prices less than $75 million; |
|
• |
SSGT II will have priority for all individual growth properties and portfolios of properties, at least a majority of which (based on allocated purchase price) are growth-oriented, with aggregate purchase prices less than $75 million; |
|
• |
we will have priority for individual properties and portfolios of properties that are passed upon by, or are not applicable to, SST IV and SSGT II; and |
|
• |
all other programs will have priority for individual properties and portfolios of properties that are passed upon by us. |
7
Employees
As of December 31, 2019, we had approximately 375 employees and believe our relationship with our employees is good. Our employees are not represented by a collective bargaining agreement.
ITEM 1A. |
RISK FACTORS |
Below are risks and uncertainties that could adversely affect our operations that we believe are material to stockholders. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we do not consider material based on the information currently available to us may also harm our business. Unless the context otherwise requires, references to stockholders are generally intended to be references to our common stockholders.
Risks Related to an Investment in SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc.
We have incurred a net loss to date and have an accumulated deficit.
We incurred a net loss attributable to our common stockholders of approximately $24.8 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. Our accumulated deficit was approximately $87.1 million as of December 31, 2019.
We have paid, and may continue to pay, distributions from sources other than cash flow from operations; therefore, we will have fewer funds available for the acquisition of properties, and our stockholders’ overall return may be reduced.
Our distributions during 2019 were funded using cash flow from operations, proceeds from our DRP Offering and other financing sources. In the future we may borrow, issue additional securities, or sell assets in order to fund the distributions or make the distributions out of proceeds from our DRP. We are not prohibited from undertaking such activities by our charter, bylaws or investment policies, and we may use an unlimited amount from any source to pay our distributions. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015, and 2016, we funded 100% of our distributions using proceeds from our Offering. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we funded 59% of our distributions using cash flow from operations and 41% using proceeds from our DRP Offering. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we funded 54% of our distributions using cash flow from operations and 46% using proceeds from our DRP Offering. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we funded 26% of our distributions using cash flows from operations, 30% using cash provided by financing activities, and 44% using proceeds from our DRP Offering. If we fund distributions from financings, then such financings will need to be repaid, and if we fund distributions from offering proceeds, then we will have fewer funds available for the acquisition of properties, which may affect our ability to generate future cash flows from operations and may reduce our stockholders’ overall returns. Additionally, to the extent distributions exceed cash flow from operations, a stockholder’s basis in our stock may be reduced and, to the extent distributions exceed a stockholder’s basis, the stockholder may recognize a capital gain.
There is currently no public trading market for our shares and there may never be one; therefore, it will be difficult for our stockholders to sell their shares. Our charter does not require us to pursue a liquidity transaction at any time.
There is currently no public market for our shares and there may never be one. Stockholders may not sell their shares unless the buyer meets applicable suitability and minimum purchase standards. Our charter also prohibits the ownership by any one individual of more than 9.8% of our stock, unless waived by our board of directors, which may inhibit large investors from desiring to purchase our stockholders’ shares. As described below, our board of directors recently suspended our share redemption program, except in limited circumstances. If we lift such suspension of our share redemption program, stockholders will continue to be limited in terms of the amount of shares which may be redeemed. Therefore, it may be difficult for our stockholders to sell their shares promptly or at all. If our stockholders are able to sell their shares, they will likely have to sell them at a substantial discount to the price they paid for the shares. It also is likely that the shares would not be accepted as the primary collateral for a loan. Our stockholders should purchase shares only as a long-term investment because of the illiquid nature of the shares.
8
Our board of directors recently suspended our share redemption program, and even if stockholders are able to have their shares redeemed, our stockholders may not be able to recover the amount of their investment in our shares.
In August 2019, our board of directors determined to suspend our share redemption program with respect to our common stockholders, effective as of September 27, 2019, except for redemption requests related to the death or disability of such stockholder (including redemption due to confinement to a long-term care facility), or other exigent circumstances.
If our share redemption program is reinstated or a common stockholder is otherwise able to have their shares redeemed, such stockholders should be fully aware that our share redemption program contains significant restrictions and limitations. Further, our board of directors may limit, suspend, terminate or amend any provision of the share redemption program upon 30 days’ notice. Redemptions of shares, when requested, will generally be made quarterly to the extent we have sufficient funds available to us to fund such redemptions. During any calendar year, we will not redeem in excess of 5% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the prior calendar year and redemptions will be funded solely from proceeds from our distribution reinvestment plan. We are not obligated to redeem shares under our share redemption program. Therefore, in making a decision to purchase our shares, our common stockholders should not assume that they will be able to sell any of their shares back to us pursuant to our share redemption program at any time or at all.
The purchase price for shares we repurchase under our share redemption program will depend on the length of time our common stockholders have held such shares. The purchase price will be as follows: 90% of the redemption amount, as defined, after one year from the purchase date; 95% of the redemption amount after three years from the purchase date; and 100% of the redemption amount after four years from the purchase date. While we are offering shares, the redemption amount equals the amount the common stockholder paid for the shares, until the offering price of such shares changes (as described in our share redemption program). Accordingly, our common stockholders may receive less by selling their shares back to us than they would receive if our investments were sold for their estimated values and such proceeds were distributed in our liquidation.
We have issued Series A Convertible Preferred Stock that ranks senior to all common stock and grants the holder superior rights compared to common stockholders, which may have the effect of diluting our stockholders’ interests in us and discouraging a takeover or other similar transaction.
We have issued Series A Convertible Preferred Stock that ranks senior to all other shares of our stock, including our common stock, and grants the holder (the “Preferred Investor”) certain rights that are superior to the rights of common stockholders, including with respect to the payment of distributions, liquidation preference, redemption rights, and conversion rights.
Distributions on the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock are cumulative and are declared and payable quarterly in arrears. We are obligated to pay the Preferred Investor its current distributions and any accumulated and unpaid distributions prior to any distributions being paid to our common stockholders and, therefore, any cash available for distribution is used first to pay distributions to the Preferred Investor. If we fail to pay distributions on the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock for four quarters (whether or not consecutive), the Preferred Investor is permitted to vote on any matter submitted to a vote of the common stockholders of the Company, upon which the Preferred Investor and common stockholders shall vote together as a single class. In such a case, the Preferred Investor’s vote would have a dilutive effect on the voting power of our common stockholders.
The Series A Convertible Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference in the event of our voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of our affairs (a “liquidation”) which could negatively affect any payments to the common stockholders in the event of a liquidation. Furthermore, the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock is redeemable in certain circumstances. A redemption of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, whether at our option or at the option of the holder of our Series A Preferred Stock, could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flow and the amount available for distributions to our common stockholders.
The Preferred Investor also has, upon the occurrence of certain events, the right to convert any or all of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock held by the Preferred Investor into shares of our common stock. The issuance of common stock upon conversion of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock would result in dilution to our common stockholders. As of December 31, 2019, we had $150 million of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding, which would represent approximately 19% of our common stock on an as converted, fully diluted basis. See Note 7, Preferred Equity, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for more information.
9
The Series A Convertible Preferred Stock also imposes several negative covenants on us such as not permitting us to exceed a leverage ratio of 60% loan-to-value or prohibiting us from entering into a merger with another entity whose assets are not at least 80% self storage related, in each case without an affirmative vote by the Preferred Investor. Because of these superior rights, the existence of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock could have the effect of discouraging a takeover or other transaction in which holders of some or a majority of our outstanding common stock might receive a premium for their shares.
We may only calculate the value per share for our shares annually and, therefore, our stockholders may not be able to determine the net asset value of their shares on an ongoing basis.
On June 26, 2019, our board of directors approved an estimated value per share for our Class A shares and Class T shares of $10.66. Our board of directors approved this estimated value per share pursuant to rules promulgated by FINRA. When determining the estimated value per share there are currently no SEC, federal and state rules that establish requirements specifying the methodology to employ in determining an estimated value per share; provided, however, that the determination of the estimated value per share must be conducted by, or with the material assistance or confirmation of, a third-party valuation expert or service and must be derived from a methodology that conforms to standard industry practice.
We intend to use this estimated per share value of our shares until the next net asset valuation approved by our board of directors, which we are required to approve at least annually. We may not calculate the net asset value per share for our shares more than annually. Therefore, you may not be able to determine the net asset value of your shares on an ongoing basis.
In determining our estimated value per share, we primarily relied upon a valuation of our portfolio of properties as of March 31, 2019. Valuations and appraisals of our properties are estimates of fair value and may not necessarily correspond to realizable value upon the sale of such properties; therefore our estimated net asset value per share may not reflect the amount that would be realized upon a sale of each of our properties.
For the purposes of calculating the estimated value per share, an independent third party appraiser valued our properties as of March 31, 2019. The valuation methodologies used to value our properties involved certain subjective judgments. Ultimate realization of the value of an asset depends to a great extent on economic and other conditions beyond our control and the control of our independent appraiser. Further, valuations do not necessarily represent the price at which an asset would sell, since market prices of assets can only be determined by negotiation between a willing buyer and seller. Therefore, the valuations of our properties and our investments in real estate related assets may not correspond to the timely realizable value upon a sale of those assets. Because our share prices are primarily based on the estimated net asset value per share, our stockholders may pay more than realizable value when such shares are purchased or receive less than realizable value when such shares are sold.
We may be unable to pay or maintain cash distributions or increase distributions over time.
There are many factors that can affect the availability and timing of cash distributions to stockholders. We are required to pay dividends with respect to our Series A Preferred Stock rate of 6.25% per annum. Distributions to our common stockholders will be based principally on distribution expectations of our investors and cash available from our operations. The amount of cash available for distribution will be affected by many factors, such as the yields on securities of other real estate programs that we invest in and our operating expense levels, as well as many other variables. Actual cash available for distribution may vary substantially from estimates. We cannot assure our stockholders that we will be able to pay or maintain distributions or that distributions will increase over time, nor can we give any assurance that rents from the properties will increase, that the securities we buy will increase in value or provide constant or increased distributions over time, or that future acquisitions of real properties will increase our cash available for distribution to stockholders. Our actual results may differ significantly from the assumptions used by our board of directors in establishing the distribution rate to stockholders. If we fail to pay distributions on the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock for four quarters (whether or not consecutive), the Preferred Investor is permitted to vote on any matter submitted to a vote of the common stockholders of the Company, upon which the Preferred Investor and common stockholders shall vote together as a single class. In such a case, the Preferred Investor’s vote would have a dilutive effect on the voting power of our common stockholders.
If we lose or are unable to retain our executive officers, our ability to implement our investment objectives could be delayed or hindered, which could adversely affect our ability to continue to pay distributions and the value of our stockholders’ investment.
Our success depends to a significant degree upon the contributions of our executive officers, including H. Michael Schwartz, Michael S. McClure, Wayne Johnson, James R. Barry, Joe Robinson, Gerald Valle, Michael Terjung, and Nicholas M. Look, each of whom would be difficult to replace. While we have adopted an Executive Severance and Change of Control Plan which is applicable to each of these officers, we do not have an employment agreement with any of these key personnel
10
and we cannot guarantee that all, or any particular one, will remain employed by us. If any of these executive officers were to cease their affiliation with us, our operating results could suffer. If we lose or are unable to retain our executive officers or do not establish or maintain appropriate strategic relationships, our ability to implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered, which could adversely affect our ability to continue to pay distributions at the current rate and the value of our stockholders’ investment.
Our Executive Severance and Change of Control Plan and the related agreements with our executive officers may result in significant expense for us and may deter a third party from engaging in a change of control transaction with us.
We have adopted an Executive Severance and Change of Control Plan that is applicable to our executive officers and have entered into an associated Severance Agreement with each of our executive officers. Pursuant to such documents, if the officer’s employment is terminated other than for cause or if the officer elects to terminate his employment with us for good reason, we will make a severance payment equal to the officer’s highest annual compensation in the prior two years plus the officer’s average cash performance bonus earned for the prior three years, multiplied by an amount specified in the Executive Severance and Change of Control Plan, together with continuation of medical coverage for a period of time specified in the Executive Severance and Change of Control Plan. In addition, certain outstanding equity awards may be subject to accelerated vesting or may remain eligible for vesting, as specified further in the Executive Severance and Change of Control Plan. These agreements may result in a significant expense for us if an executive officer’s employment is terminated for certain reasons, and may discourage a third party from acquiring us.
Impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets resulting from the Self Administration Transaction may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Potential impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets, including trademarks and other acquired intangibles, resulting from the Self Administration Transaction could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. We assess our goodwill and other intangible assets and long-lived assets for impairment at least annually or upon the occurrence of a triggering event, as required by GAAP. We are required to record an impairment charge if circumstances indicate that the asset carrying values exceed their fair values. Our assessment of goodwill, other intangible assets, or long-lived assets could indicate that an impairment of the carrying value of such assets may have occurred that could result in a material, non-cash write-down of such assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and future earnings.
Our trademarks are important.
In connection with the Self Administration Transaction, we acquired trademarks and other intellectual property rights, including but not limited to the “SmartStop®” and “Strategic Storage®” brands, which are important to our success and competitive position, and the loss of or our inability to enforce trademark and other proprietary intellectual property rights could harm our business. We will devote substantial resources to the establishment and protection of our trademarks and other proprietary intellectual property rights.
Our efforts to protect our intellectual property may not be adequate. Third parties may misappropriate or infringe on our intellectual property. From time to time, we may engage in litigation to protect our intellectual property, which could result in substantial costs as well as diversion of management attention. The occurrence of any of these risks could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We recently became a self-managed REIT and have limited operating experience being self-managed.
As a result of the Self Administration Transaction, we are a newly self-managed REIT. We no longer bear the costs of the various fees and expense reimbursements previously paid to our former external advisor and its affiliates; however, our expenses now include the compensation and benefits of our officers and employees, as well as overhead previously paid by our former external advisor and its affiliates. Our employees now provide services historically provided by the external advisors and their affiliates. We are subject to potential liabilities that are commonly faced by employers, such as workers’ disability and compensation claims, potential labor disputes, and other employee-related liabilities and grievances, and we bear the cost of the establishment and maintenance of any employee compensation plans. In addition, we have not previously operated as a self-managed REIT and may encounter unforeseen costs, expenses, and difficulties associated with providing these services on a self-advised basis. If we incur unexpected expenses as a result of our self-management, our results of operations could be more negatively impacted than they otherwise would have been.
11
Strategic Transfer Agent Services, LLC, our Transfer Agent, has a limited operating history and a failure by our Transfer Agent to perform its functions for us effectively may adversely affect our operations.
Our Transfer Agent is a related party which was recently launched as a new business. While it is a registered transfer agent with the SEC, the business was formed in October 2017 and has had only limited operations to date. Because of its limited experience, there is no assurance that our Transfer Agent will be able to effectively provide transfer agent and registrar services to us. Furthermore, our Transfer Agent will be responsible for supervising third party service providers who may, at times, be responsible for executing certain transfer agent and registrar services. If our Transfer Agent fails to perform its functions for us effectively, our operations may be adversely affected.
Our cash could be adversely affected if the financial institutions in which we hold our cash fail.
We maintain domestic cash deposits in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") insured banks and in money market accounts. These balances may exceed FDIC insurance limits or may otherwise not be subject to FDIC coverage. These balances could be impacted if one or more of the financial institutions in which we deposit monies fails or is subject to other adverse conditions in the financial or credit markets. We can provide no assurance that access to our invested cash and cash equivalents will not be impacted by adverse conditions in the financial and credit markets.
We may make loans to fund the development or purchase of self storage facilities, and we may invest in mortgage or other loans, but if these loans are not fully repaid, the resulting losses could reduce the expected cash available for distribution to our stockholders and the value of our stockholders’ investment.
From time to time, we may make loans to entities developing or acquiring self storage facilities, subject to any limitations in our charter. We may also invest in first or second mortgage loans, mezzanine loans secured by an interest in the entity owning the real estate, or other similar real estate loans consistent with our REIT status. We may also invest in participating or convertible mortgages if our board of directors conclude that we and our stockholders may benefit from the cash flow or any appreciation in the value of the subject property. There can be no assurance that these loans will be repaid to us in part or in full in accordance with the terms of the loan or that we will receive interest payments on the outstanding balance of the loan. We anticipate that these loans will be secured by mortgages on the self storage facilities, but in the event of a foreclosure, there can be no assurances that we will recover the outstanding balance of the loan. If there are defaults under these loans, we may not be able to repossess and sell the underlying properties quickly. The resulting time delay and associated costs could reduce the value of our investment in the defaulted loans. An action to foreclose on a property securing a mortgage loan is regulated by state statutes and regulations and is subject to many of the delays and expenses of other lawsuits if the defendant raises defenses or counterclaims. In the event of default by a mortgagor, these restrictions, among other things, may impede our ability to foreclose on or sell the mortgaged property or to obtain proceeds sufficient to repay all amounts due to us on the mortgage loan.
Our bylaws designate the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or employees.
Our bylaws provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland, or, if that Court does not have jurisdiction, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Baltimore Division, shall be the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by our stockholders with respect to our Company, our directors, our officers, or our employees. This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that the stockholder believes is favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or employees, which may discourage meritorious claims from being asserted against us and our directors, officers, and employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find this provision of our bylaws inapplicable to, or unenforceable in respect of, one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Our future results may suffer if we do not effectively manage our expanded operations following the SSGT Mergers.
We consummated the SSGT Mergers in January 2019. We may continue to expand our operations through additional acquisitions and other strategic transactions, some of which may involve complex challenges. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to manage our expansion opportunities, integrate new operations into our existing business in an efficient and timely manner, successfully monitoring our operations, costs and service quality, and maintaining other
12
necessary internal controls. There can be no assurance that our expansion or acquisition opportunities will be successful, or that we will realize our expected operating efficiencies, cost savings, revenue enhancements, synergies, or other benefits.
Privacy concerns could result in regulatory changes that may harm our business.
The California Consumer Privacy Act (the “CCPA”) went into effect on January 1, 2020. The CCPA is intended to protect consumer privacy rights, and, among other things, it provides California residents with the ability to know what information companies collect about them, to request, in certain circumstances, the deletion of such information, and to affirmatively opt out of the sale of their personal information. However, regulations from the California Attorney General have not been finalized, and it is expected that additional amendments to the CCPA will be introduced in 2020. It therefore remains unclear what, if any, modifications will be made to the CCPA or how these will be interpreted. While we believe we have developed processes to comply with CCPA requirements, a regulatory agency may not agree with certain of our implementation decisions, which could subject us to litigation, regulatory actions or changes to our business practices that could increase costs or reduce revenues. Other states have also considered or are considering privacy laws similar to the CCPA. Similar laws may be implemented in other jurisdictions that we do business in and in ways that may be more restrictive than the CCPA, increasing the cost of compliance, as well as the risk of noncompliance, on our business.
Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest
Our officers and certain of our key personnel will face competing demands relating to their time, and this may cause our operating results to suffer.
Our officers and certain of our key personnel and their respective affiliates are key personnel, advisors, managers, and sponsors of other real estate programs having investment objectives and legal and financial obligations similar to ours, including the Managed REITs. Because these persons have competing demands on their time and resources, they may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time between our business and these other activities. During times of intense activity in other programs and ventures, they may devote less time and fewer resources to our business than is necessary or appropriate. If this occurs, the returns on our stockholders’ investments may suffer.
Certain of our officers face conflicts of interest related to the positions they hold with affiliated entities, which could hinder our ability to successfully implement our investment objectives and to generate returns to our stockholders.
Certain of our executive officers are also officers of affiliated entities, including the Managed REITs. As a result, these individuals owe fiduciary duties to these other entities and their owners, which fiduciary duties may conflict with the duties that they owe to our stockholders and us. Their loyalties to these other entities could result in actions or inactions that are detrimental to our business, which could harm the implementation of our investment objectives. Conflicts with our business and interests are most likely to arise from involvement in activities related to (1) allocation of new investments and management time and services between us and the other entities, (2) our purchase of properties from, or sale of properties to, affiliated entities, (3) the timing and terms of the investment in or sale of an asset, (4) development of our properties by affiliates, and (5) investments with affiliates. If we do not successfully implement our investment objectives, we may be unable to generate cash needed to continue to pay distributions at the current rate to our stockholders and to maintain or increase the value of our assets.
We may face a conflict of interest if we purchase properties from, or sell properties to, our affiliates, including the Managed REITs.
We may purchase properties from, or sell properties to, one or more of our affiliates, including the Managed REITs, in the future. A conflict of interest may exist if such acquisition or disposition occurs. The business interests of our affiliates may be adverse to, or to the detriment of, our interests. Additionally, if we purchase properties from our affiliates, the prices we pay to these affiliates for our properties may be equal to, or in excess of, the prices paid by them, plus the costs incurred by them relating to the acquisition and financing of the properties. If we sell properties to our affiliates, the offers we receive from these affiliates for our properties may be equal to, or less than, the prices we paid for the properties. These prices will not be the subject of arm’s-length negotiations, which could mean that the acquisitions may be on terms less favorable to us than those negotiated in an arm’s-length transaction. Even though we intend to use an independent third-party appraiser to determine fair market value when acquiring properties from, or selling properties to, our affiliates, we may pay more, or may not be offered as much, for particular properties than we would have in an arm’s-length transaction, which would reduce our cash available for investment in other properties or distribution to our stockholders.
13
Furthermore, because any agreement that we enter into with our affiliates will not be negotiated in an arm’s-length transaction, we may be reluctant to enforce the agreements against those affiliated entities.
We will face conflicts of interest relating to joint ventures that we may form with our affiliates, which conflicts could result in a disproportionate benefit to other joint venture partners at our expense.
We may enter into joint ventures with our affiliates, including the Managed REITs, for the acquisition, development, or improvement of properties. We may have conflicts of interest in determining which program should enter into any particular joint venture agreement. The co-venturer may have economic or business interests or goals that are or may become inconsistent with our business interests or goals. In addition, we may face a conflict in structuring the terms of the relationship between our interests and the interest of the affiliated co-venturer and in managing the joint venture. Agreements and transactions between us and the co-venturers with respect to any such joint venture will not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiation of the type normally conducted between unrelated co-venturers, which may result in the co-venturers receiving benefits greater than the benefits that we receive. In addition, we may assume liabilities related to the joint venture that exceeds the percentage of our investment in the joint venture, and this could reduce the returns on investment.
Our Executive Chairman is a controlling person of an entity that owns a minority interest in our Operating Partnership and Class A Shares, and therefore may face conflicts with regard to his fiduciary duties to us and his fiduciary duties to that entity, including conditions pertaining to redemption of our common stock or the limited partnership interests and voting matters related to such interests.
Our Executive Chairman is a controlling person of SAM, our former sponsor, which indirectly currently owns an approximately 13% interest in limited partnership interests in our Operating Partnership and 0.8% of our common stock. Such limited partnership interests may be exchanged for our common stock in the future. In addition, in certain circumstances such as a merger, sale of all or substantially all of our assets, share exchange, conversion, dissolution or amendment to our charter, in each case where the vote of our stockholders is required under Maryland law, the consent of our Operating Partnership will also be required, which could result in our Executive Chairman being able to influence such matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders. This may result in an outcome that may not be favorable to our stockholders. Our Executive Chairman may also make decisions on behalf of SAM related to redemptions of either its limited partnership interests or its common stock which may negatively impact our stockholders.
There is no separate counsel for us and our affiliates, which could result in conflicts of interest.
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP (Nelson Mullins) acts as legal counsel to us and also represents some of our affiliates, including the Managed REITs. There is a possibility in the future that the interests of the various parties may become adverse and, under the code of professional responsibility of the legal profession, Nelson Mullins may be precluded from representing any one or all of such parties. If any situation arises in which our interests appear to be in conflict with those of our affiliates, additional counsel may be retained by one or more of the parties to assure that their interests are adequately protected. Moreover, should a conflict of interest not be readily apparent, Nelson Mullins may inadvertently act in derogation of the interest of the parties, which could affect our ability to meet our investment objectives.
Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure
The limit on the number of shares a person may own may discourage a takeover that could otherwise result in a premium price to our stockholders.
In order for us to qualify as a REIT, no more than 50% of our outstanding stock may be beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (including certain types of entities) at any time during the last half of each taxable year. To ensure that we do not fail to qualify as a REIT under this test, our charter restricts ownership by one person or entity to no more than 9.8% of the value of our then-outstanding capital stock or more than 9.8% of the value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of our then outstanding common stock. This restriction may have the effect of delaying, deferring, or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer, or sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that might provide a premium price for holders of our common stock.
14
Our charter permits our board of directors to issue stock with terms that may subordinate the rights of common stockholders or discourage a third party from acquiring us in a manner that might result in a premium price to our stockholders.
Our charter permits our board of directors to issue up to 900,000,000 shares of capital stock. In addition, our board of directors, without any action by our stockholders, may amend our charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares or the number of shares of any class or series of stock that we have authority to issue. Our board of directors may classify or reclassify any unissued common stock or preferred stock and establish the preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption of any such stock. Thus, our board of directors could authorize the issuance of preferred stock with terms and conditions that have a priority as to distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation over the rights of the holders of our common stock, such as our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. See the risk factor captioned “We have issued Series A Convertible Preferred Stock that ranks senior to all common stock and grants the holder superior rights compared to common stockholders, which may have the effect of diluting our stockholders’ interests in us and discouraging a takeover or other similar transaction.” in the section titled “Risks Related to an Investment in SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc.,” above. Preferred stock could also have the effect of delaying, deferring, or preventing a change in control of our company, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer, or sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that might provide a premium price for holders of our common stock.
We will not be afforded the protection of Maryland law relating to business combinations.
Under Maryland law, “business combinations” between a Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder (as defined in the statute) or an affiliate of an interested stockholder are prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. These business combinations include a merger, consolidation, share exchange, or, in circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity securities. An interested stockholder is defined as:
|
• |
any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of the corporation’s shares; or |
|
• |
an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of the then outstanding voting stock of the corporation. |
These prohibitions are intended to prevent a change of control by interested stockholders who do not have the support of our board of directors. Pursuant to the statute, our board of directors has by resolution exempted business combinations between us and any person, provided that the business combination is first approved by our board of directors. We cannot assure you that our board of directors will not amend or repeal this resolution in the future. Therefore, we will not be afforded the protections of this statute and, accordingly, there is no guarantee that the ownership limitations in our charter would provide the same measure of protection as the business combinations statute and prevent an undesired change of control by an interested stockholder.
Our rights and the rights of our stockholders to recover claims against our officers and directors are limited, which could reduce our stockholders’ and our recovery against them if they cause us to incur losses.
Maryland law provides that a director has no liability in that capacity if the director performs their duties in good faith, in a manner the director reasonably believes to be in the corporation’s best interests, and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. Our charter requires us to indemnify our directors, officers, employees and agents for actions taken by them in good faith and without negligence or misconduct. Additionally, our charter limits the liability of our directors and officers for monetary damages to the maximum extent permitted under Maryland law. As a result, we and our stockholders may have more limited rights against our directors, officers, employees and agents than might otherwise exist under common law, which could reduce our stockholders’ and our recovery against them. We have also entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers, which obligate us to indemnify such persons in certain circumstances, including if they are or are threatened to be made a party to, or witness in, any proceeding by reason of their status as a present or former director or officer of us. In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by our directors, officers, employees and agents in some cases which would decrease the cash otherwise available for distribution to our stockholders.
15
Our board of directors may change any of our investment objectives, including our focus on self storage facilities.
Our board of directors may change any of our investment objectives, including our focus on self storage facilities. If our stockholders do not agree with a decision of our board to change any of our investment objectives, our stockholders only have limited control over such changes. Additionally, we cannot assure our stockholders that we would be successful in attaining any of these investment objectives, which may adversely impact our financial performance and ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
Our stockholders’ interests in us will be diluted as we issue additional shares.
Our stockholders will not have preemptive rights to any shares issued by us in the future. Subject to any limitations set forth under Maryland law, our board of directors may increase the number of authorized shares of stock (currently 900,000,000 shares), increase or decrease the number of shares of any class or series of stock designated, or reclassify any unissued shares without the necessity of obtaining stockholder approval. All such shares may be issued in the discretion of our board of directors. Further, our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock may be converted into our common stock under certain circumstances. Therefore, existing stockholders will experience dilution of their equity investment in us as we (1) sell additional shares in the future, including those issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, or sell additional shares in the future, (2) sell securities that are convertible into shares of our common stock, (3) issue shares of our common stock in a private offering of securities, (4) issue restricted shares of our common stock or other equity-based securities to our independent directors and executive officers, (5) issue shares of our common stock in a merger or to sellers of properties acquired by us in connection with an exchange of limited partnership interests of our Operating Partnership, or (6) convert shares of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock into shares of our common stock. Because the limited partnership interests of our Operating Partnership may, in the discretion of our board of directors, be exchanged for shares of our common stock, any merger, exchange or conversion between our Operating Partnership and another entity ultimately could result in the issuance of a substantial number of shares of our common stock, thereby diluting the percentage ownership interest of other stockholders. Because of these and other reasons, our stockholders may experience substantial dilution in their percentage ownership of our shares.
We are uncertain of our sources of debt or equity for funding our future capital needs. If we cannot obtain funding on acceptable terms, our ability to make necessary capital improvements to our properties, pay other expenses, or expand our business may be impaired or delayed.
We expect our primary use of capital to be paying distributions to our stockholders and making capital investments into our assets and our business. In addition, in order to continue to qualify as a REIT, we generally must distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our taxable income each year, excluding capital gains. Because of this distribution requirement, it is not likely that we will be able to fund a significant portion of our future capital needs from retained earnings. We have not identified any additional sources of capital for future funding, and such sources of funding may not be available to us on favorable terms or at all. If we do not have access to sufficient funding in the future, we may not be able to make necessary capital improvements to our properties, pay other expenses or expand our business.
Risks Related to the Self Storage Industry
Because we are focused on the self storage industry, our rental revenues will be significantly influenced by demand for self storage space generally, and a decrease in such demand would likely have a greater adverse effect on our rental revenues than if we owned a more diversified real estate portfolio.
Because our portfolio of properties consists primarily of self storage facilities, we are subject to risks inherent in investments in a single industry. A decrease in the demand for self storage space would likely have a greater adverse effect on our rental revenues than if we owned a more diversified real estate portfolio. Demand for self storage space has been and could be adversely affected by weakness in the national, regional, and local economies and changes in supply of or demand for similar or competing self storage facilities in an area. To the extent that any of these conditions occur, they are likely to affect demand, and market rents, for self storage space, which could cause a decrease in our rental revenue. Any such decrease could impair our ability to continue to pay distributions at the current rate to our stockholders. We do not expect to invest in other real estate or businesses to hedge against the risk that industry trends might decrease the profitability of our self storage-related investments.
16
We face significant competition in the self storage industry, which may increase the cost of acquisitions or developments or impede our ability to retain customers or re-let space when existing customers vacate.
We face intense competition in every market in which we purchase self storage facilities. We compete with numerous national, regional, and local developers, owners and operators in the self storage industry, including the Managed REITs and other REITs. Moreover, development of self-storage facilities has increased in recent years, which has intensified competition, and we expect it will continue to do so as newly developed facilities are opened. In addition, competition for suitable investments may reduce the number of suitable investment opportunities available to us, may increase acquisition costs, and may reduce demand for self storage units in certain areas where our facilities are located, all of which may adversely affect our operating results. Additionally, an economic slowdown in a particular market could have a negative effect on our self storage revenues.
If competitors build new facilities that compete with our facilities or offer space at rental rates below the rental rates we charge our customers, we may lose potential or existing customers and we may be pressured to discount our rental rates to retain customers. As a result, our rental revenues may become insufficient to continue to pay distributions at the current rate to our stockholders. In addition, increased competition for customers may require us to make capital improvements to facilities that we would not otherwise make, which could reduce cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
The acquisition of new properties may give rise to difficulties in predicting revenue potential.
New acquisitions could fail to perform in accordance with our expectations. If we fail to accurately estimate occupancy levels, rental rates, operating costs, or costs of improvements to bring an acquired facility up to our standards, the performance of the facility may be below expectations. Properties we acquire may have characteristics or deficiencies affecting their valuation or revenue potential that we have not yet discovered. We cannot assure our stockholders that the performance of properties we acquire will increase or be maintained under our management.
We may be unable to promptly re-let units within our facilities at satisfactory rental rates.
Generally, our unit leases are on a month-to-month basis. Delays in re-letting units as vacancies arise would reduce our revenues and could adversely affect our operating performance. In addition, lower-than-expected rental rates and higher rental concessions upon re-letting could adversely affect our rental revenues and impede our growth.
We depend on our on-site personnel to maximize customer satisfaction at each of our facilities, and any difficulties we encounter in hiring, training, and retaining skilled field personnel may adversely affect our rental revenues.
The customer service, marketing skills, knowledge of local market demand and competitive dynamics of our facility managers are contributing factors to our ability to maximize our rental income and to achieve the highest sustainable rent levels at each of our facilities. If we are unable to successfully recruit, train, and retain qualified field personnel, our rental revenues may be adversely affected, which could impair our ability to continue to pay distributions at the current rate to our stockholders.
Legal claims related to moisture infiltration and mold could arise in one or more of our properties, which could adversely affect our revenues.
There has been an increasing number of claims and litigation against owners and managers of rental and self storage properties relating to moisture infiltration, which can result in mold or other property damage. We cannot guarantee that moisture infiltration will not occur at one or more of our properties. When we receive a complaint concerning moisture infiltration, condensation, or mold problems and/or become aware that an air quality concern exists, we will implement corrective measures in accordance with guidelines and protocols we have developed with the assistance of outside experts. We cannot assure our stockholders that material legal claims relating to moisture infiltration and the presence of, or exposure to, mold will not arise in the future. These legal claims could require significant expenditures for legal defense representation which could adversely affect our revenues.
17
Delays in development and lease-up of our properties would reduce our profitability.
We may acquire properties that require repositioning or redeveloping such properties with the goal of increasing cash flow, value or both. Construction delays to new or existing self storage properties due to weather, unforeseen site conditions, personnel problems (including as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak), and other factors could delay our anticipated customer occupancy plan which could adversely affect our profitability and cash flow. Furthermore, our estimate of the costs of repositioning or redeveloping an acquired property may prove to be inaccurate, which may result in our failure to meet our profitability goals. We may also encounter unforeseen cost increases associated with building materials or construction services resulting from trade tensions, disruptions, tariffs, duties or restrictions or an epidemic, pandemic or other health crisis, such as the COVID-19 outbreak. Additionally, we may acquire a new property that has a relatively low physical occupancy, and the cash flow from existing operations may be insufficient to pay the operating expenses associated with that property until the property is adequately leased. If one or more of these properties do not perform as expected or we are unable to successfully integrate new properties into our existing operations, our financial performance and our ability to make distributions may be adversely affected.
The risks associated with storage contents may increase our operating costs or expose us to potential liability that may not be covered by insurance, which may have adverse effects on our results of operations and returns to our stockholders.
The self storage facilities we own and operate are leased directly to customers who store their belongings without any immediate inspections or oversight from us. We may unintentionally lease space to groups engaged in illegal and dangerous activities. Damage to storage contents may occur due to, among other occurrences, the following: war, acts of terrorism, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, pollution, environmental matters, fires or events caused by fault of a customer, fault of a third party, or fault of our own. Such damage may or may not be covered by insurance maintained by us, if any. We will determine the amounts and types of insurance coverage that we will maintain, including any coverage over the contents of any properties in which we may invest. Such determinations will be made on a case-by-case basis based on the type, value, location, and risks associated with each investment, as well as any lender requirements, among any other factors we may consider relevant. There is no guarantee as to the type of insurance that we will obtain for any investments that we may make and there is no guarantee that any particular damage to storage contents would be covered by such insurance, even if obtained. The costs associated with maintaining such insurance, as well as any liability imposed upon us due to damage to storage contents, may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and returns to our stockholders.
Additionally, although we require our customers to sign an agreement stating that they will not store flammable, hazardous, illegal, or dangerous contents in the self storage units, we cannot ensure that our customers will abide by such agreement. The storage of such materials might cause destruction to a facility or impose liability on us for the costs of removal or remediation if these various contents or substances are released on, from or in a facility, which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and returns to our stockholders.
Our operating results may be affected by regulatory changes that have an adverse impact on our specific facilities, which may adversely affect our results of operations and returns to our stockholders.
Certain regulatory changes may have a direct impact on our self storage facilities, including but not limited to, land use, zoning, and permitting requirements by governmental authorities at the local level, which can restrict the availability of land for development, and special zoning codes which omit certain uses of property from a zoning category. These special uses (i.e., hospitals, schools, and self storage facilities) are allowed in that particular zoning classification only by obtaining a special use permit and the permission of local zoning authority. If we are delayed in obtaining or unable to obtain a special use permit where one is required, new developments or expansion of existing developments could be delayed or reduced. Additionally, certain municipalities require holders of a special use permit to have higher levels of liability coverage than is normally required. The acquisition of, or the inability to obtain, a special use permit and the possibility of higher levels of insurance coverage associated therewith may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and returns to our stockholders.
A failure in, or breach of, our operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of our third party vendors and other service providers or other third parties, including as a result of cyber attacks, could disrupt our businesses, result in the disclosure or misuse of confidential or proprietary information, damage our reputation, increase our costs, and cause losses.
We rely heavily on communications and information systems to conduct our business. Information security risks for our business have generally increased in recent years in part because of the proliferation of new technologies; the use of the
18
Internet and telecommunications technologies to process, transmit and store electronic information, including the management and support of a variety of business processes, including financial transactions and records, personally identifiable information, and tenant and lease data; and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, hackers, and terrorists, activists, and other external parties. As customer, public, and regulatory expectations regarding operational and information security have increased, our operating systems and infrastructure must continue to be safeguarded and monitored for potential failures, disruptions, and breakdowns. Our business, financial, accounting, and data processing systems, or other operating systems and facilities, may stop operating properly or become disabled or damaged as a result of a number of factors, including events that are wholly or partially beyond our control. For example, there could be electrical or telecommunication outages; natural disasters such as earthquakes, tornadoes, and hurricanes; disease pandemics; events arising from local or larger scale political or social matters, including terrorist acts; and as described below, cyber attacks.
Our business relies on its digital technologies, computer and email systems, software and networks to conduct its operations. Although we have information security procedures and controls in place, our technologies, systems and networks and, because the nature of our business involves the receipt and retention of personal information about our customers, our customers’ personal accounts may become the target of cyber attacks or information security breaches that could result in the unauthorized release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss, or destruction of our or our customers’ or other third parties’ confidential information. Third parties with whom we do business or who facilitate our business activities, including intermediaries or vendors that provide service or security solutions for our operations, and other third parties, could also be sources of operational and information security risk to us, including from breakdowns or failures of their own systems or capacity constraints. In addition, hardware, software or applications we develop or procure from third parties may contain defects in design or manufacture or other problems that could unexpectedly compromise information security.
While we have disaster recovery and other policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of the failure, interruption or security breach of our information systems, there can be no assurance that any such failures, interruptions or security breaches will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed. Our risk and exposure to these matters remain heightened because of the evolving nature of these threats. As a result, cyber security and the continued development and enhancement of our controls, processes, and practices designed to protect our systems, computers, software, data, and networks from attack, damage or unauthorized access remain a focus for us. As threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate information security vulnerabilities. Disruptions or failures in the physical infrastructure or operating systems that support our businesses and customers, or cyber attacks or security breaches of the networks, systems or devices that our customers use to access our products and services, could result in customer attrition, regulatory fines, penalties or intervention, reputation damage, reimbursement or other compensation costs, and/or additional compliance costs, any of which could have a material effect on our results of operations or financial condition. Furthermore, if such attacks are not detected immediately, their effect could be compounded.
If we enter into non-compete agreements with the sellers of the self storage properties that we acquire, and the terms of those agreements expire, the sellers may compete with us within the general location of one of our self storage facilities, which could have an adverse effect on our operating results and returns to our stockholders.
We may enter into non-compete agreements with the sellers of the self storage properties that we acquire in order to prohibit the seller from owning, operating, or being employed by a competing self storage property for a predetermined time frame and within a geographic radius of a self storage facility we acquire. When these non-compete agreements expire, we may face the risk that the seller will develop, own, operate, or become employed by a competing self storage facility within the general location of one of our properties, which could have an adverse effect on our operating results and returns to our stockholders.
We face risks related to an epidemic, pandemic or other health crisis, such as the recent outbreak of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”), which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and prospects.
We face risks related to an epidemic, pandemic or other health crisis. In December 2019, COVID-19 emerged in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. While initially the outbreak was largely concentrated in China and caused significant disruptions to its economy, it has now spread to several other countries and infections have been reported globally, including in the United States and in the markets in which we operate. Our rental revenue and operating results depend significantly on the demand for self storage space. While we have not seen a significant impact on the demand for self storage space resulting from the COVID-19 outbreak as of the date of this report, if the outbreak causes weakness in national, regional and local
19
economies that negatively impact the demand for self storage space and/or increase bad debts, our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and prospects could be adversely impacted. Additionally, we typically conduct aspects of our leasing activity at our facilities, as well as the offering of various ancillary products, including moving and packing supplies, such as locks and boxes, and other services, such as protection plans, tenant insurance or similar programs. Accordingly, reductions in the ability and willingness of customers to visit our facilities due to the COVID-19 outbreak could reduce rental revenue and ancillary operating revenue produced by our facilities. Concerns relating to such an outbreak could also impact the availability of our personnel to report for work at our facilities, which could adversely affect our ability to adequately manage our facilities. In order to prevent the spread of COVID-19 there have been, and may continue to be, temporary shut downs or restrictions placed on businesses by cities, counties, states, or the federal government. These orders have impacted, and may continue to impact, our facilities and operations. The ultimate extent of the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and prospects will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information that may emerge concerning the breadth or severity of the COVID-19 outbreak and the actions to contain or treat its impact, among others.
General Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate
Our operating results will be affected by economic and regulatory changes that have an adverse impact on the real estate market in general, and we cannot assure our stockholders that we will be profitable or that we will realize growth in the value of our real estate properties.
Our operating results will be subject to risks generally incident to the ownership of real estate, including:
|
• |
changes in general economic or local conditions; |
|
• |
changes in supply of or demand for similar or competing properties in an area; |
|
• |
changes in interest rates and availability of permanent mortgage funds that may render the sale of a property difficult or unattractive; |
|
• |
changes in tax, real estate, environmental, and zoning laws; |
|
• |
changes in property tax assessments and insurance costs; and |
|
• |
increases in interest rates and tight money supply. |
These and other reasons may prevent us from being profitable or from realizing growth or maintaining the value of our real estate properties.
We may suffer reduced or delayed revenues for, or have difficulty selling, properties with vacancies.
We anticipate that the majority of the properties we own or will acquire will ultimately have stabilized occupancy levels (at or above 75%). However, certain of the real properties we own or will acquire may have some level of vacancy at the time of closing either because the property is in the process of being developed and constructed, it is newly constructed and in the process of obtaining customers, or because of economic or competitive or other factors. Shortly after a new property is opened, during a time of development and construction, or because of economic or competitive or other factors, we may suffer reduced revenues resulting in lower cash distributions to our stockholders due to a lack of an optimum level of customers. The resale value of properties with prolonged low occupancy rates could suffer, which could further reduce our stockholders’ returns.
A high concentration of our properties in a particular geographic area would magnify the effects of downturns in that geographic area.
In the event that we have a concentration of properties in any particular geographic area, any adverse situation that disproportionately affects that geographic area would have a magnified adverse effect on our portfolio. For the month of December 2019, approximately 24%, 21%, 13%, and 9% of our rental income was concentrated in California, Florida, Ontario (Canada), and North Carolina, respectively.
20
We may obtain only limited warranties when we purchase a property.
The seller of a property will often sell such property in its “as is” condition on a “where is” basis and “with all faults,” without any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular use or purpose. In addition, purchase agreements may contain only limited warranties, representations, and indemnifications that will only survive for a limited period after the closing. Also, many sellers of real estate are single purpose entities without significant other assets. The purchase of properties with limited warranties or from undercapitalized sellers increases the risk that we may lose some or all of our invested capital in the property as well as rental income from that property.
Our inability to sell a property when we desire to do so could adversely impact our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders.
The real estate market is affected by many factors, such as general economic conditions, availability of financing, interest rates and other factors, including supply and demand, that are beyond our control. We cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any property for the price or on the terms set by us, or whether any price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us. We cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a property. Real estate generally cannot be sold quickly. Also, the tax laws applicable to REITs require that we hold our facilities for investment, rather than for sale in the ordinary course of business, which may cause us to forego or defer sales of facilities that otherwise would be in our best interest. Therefore, we may not be able to dispose of facilities promptly, or on favorable terms, in response to economic or other market conditions, and this may adversely impact our ability to continue to pay distributions at the current rate to our stockholders.
In addition, we may be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a property can be sold. We cannot assure our stockholders that we will have funds available to correct such defects or to make such improvements.
In acquiring a property, we may agree to restrictions that prohibit the sale of that property for a period of time or impose other restrictions, such as a limitation on the amount of debt that can be placed or repaid on that property. These provisions would also restrict our ability to sell a property.
We may not be able to sell our properties at a price equal to, or greater than, the price for which we purchased such properties, which may lead to a decrease in the value of our assets.
We may be purchasing our properties at a time when capitalization rates are at historically low levels and purchase prices are high. Therefore, the value of our properties may not increase over time, which may restrict our ability to sell our properties, or in the event we are able to sell such property, may lead to a sale price less than the price that we paid to purchase the properties.
We may acquire or finance properties with lock-out provisions, which may prohibit us from selling a property, or may require us to maintain specified debt levels for a period of years on some properties.
Lock-out provisions are provisions that generally prohibit repayment of a loan balance for a certain number of years following the origination date of a loan. Such provisions are typically provided for by the Code or the terms of the agreement underlying a loan. Lock-out provisions could materially restrict us from selling or otherwise disposing of or refinancing properties. These provisions would affect our ability to turn our investments into cash and thus affect cash available for distribution to our stockholders. Lock-out provisions may prohibit us from reducing the outstanding indebtedness with respect to any properties, refinancing such indebtedness on a non-recourse basis at maturity, or increasing the amount of indebtedness with respect to such properties.
Lock-out provisions could impair our ability to take actions during the lock-out period that would otherwise be in our stockholders’ best interests and, therefore, may have an adverse impact on the value of the shares, relative to the value that would result if the lock-out provisions did not exist. In particular, lock-out provisions could preclude us from participating in major transactions that could result in a disposition of our assets or a change in control, even though that disposition or change in control might be in our stockholders’ best interests.
Rising expenses could reduce cash available for future acquisitions.
Any properties that we buy in the future will be subject to operating risks common to real estate in general, any or all of which may negatively affect us. If any property is not fully occupied or if rents are being paid in an amount that is
21
insufficient to cover operating expenses, we could be required to expend funds for that property’s operating expenses. Our properties will be subject to increases in tax rates, utility costs, operating expenses, insurance costs, repairs and maintenance and administrative expenses.
If we are unable to offset such cost increases through rent increases, we could be required to fund those increases in operating costs which could adversely affect funds available for future acquisitions or cash available for distribution.
Adverse economic conditions will negatively affect our returns and profitability.
The following market and economic challenges may adversely affect our operating results:
|
• |
poor economic times may result in customer defaults under leases or bankruptcy; |
|
• |
re-leasing may require reduced rental rates under the new leases; and |
|
• |
increased insurance premiums, resulting in part from the increased risk of terrorism and natural disasters, may reduce funds available for distribution. |
We are susceptible to the effects of adverse macro-economic events that can result in higher unemployment, shrinking demand for products, large-scale business failures, and tight credit markets. Because our portfolio of facilities consists of self storage facilities, we are subject to risks inherent in investments in a single industry, and our results of operations are sensitive to changes in overall economic conditions that impact consumer spending, including discretionary spending, as well as to increased bad debts due to recessionary pressures. A continuation of, or slow recovery from, ongoing adverse economic conditions affecting disposable consumer income, such as employment levels, business conditions, interest rates, tax rates, and fuel and energy costs, could reduce consumer spending or cause consumers to shift their spending to other products and services. A general reduction in the level of discretionary spending or shifts in consumer discretionary spending could adversely affect our growth and profitability.
Since we cannot predict when real estate markets may recover, the value of the properties we acquire may decline if market conditions persist or worsen. Further, the results of operations for a property in any one period may not be indicative of results in future periods, and the long-term performance of such property generally may not be comparable to, and cash flows may not be as predictable as, other properties owned by third parties in the same or similar industry.
Our tenant insurance and tenant protection plan businesses are, in some cases, subject to governmental regulation, which may adversely affect our results.
Depending on the jurisdiction, we provide either tenant insurance or a tenant protection plan to customers at our properties. These businesses, including the payments associated with these arrangements, may be subject to state-specific or provincial-specific governmental regulation. Such regulatory authorities generally have broad discretion to promulgate, interpret and implement regulations, to adopt new or additional licensing requirements, to grant, renew and revoke licenses and approvals, and to evaluate compliance with regulations through periodic examinations, audits, investigations and inquiries. In addition, there has been and may continue to be regulatory or private action in the jurisdictions in which we operate. The impact of such actions could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
If we suffer losses that are not covered by insurance or that are in excess of insurance coverage, we could lose invested capital and anticipated profits.
Material losses may occur in excess of insurance proceeds with respect to any property, as insurance may not be sufficient to fund the losses. However, there are types of losses, generally of a catastrophic nature, such as losses due to wars, acts of terrorism, earthquakes, floods, fires, hurricanes, pollution or environmental matters, which are either uninsurable or not economically insurable, or may be insured subject to limitations such as large deductibles or co-payments. Insurance risks associated with potential terrorist acts could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims. Additionally, mortgage lenders in some cases require that commercial property owners purchase specific coverage against terrorism as a condition for providing mortgage loans. It is uncertain whether such insurance policies will be available, or available at reasonable cost, which could inhibit our ability to finance or refinance our potential properties. In these instances, we may be required to provide other financial support, either through financial assurances or self-insurance, to cover potential losses. We cannot assure our stockholders that we will have adequate coverage for such losses. The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 is designed for a sharing of terrorism losses between insurance companies and the federal government and requires that insurers make terrorism insurance available under their property and casualty insurance
22
policies, but this legislation does not regulate the pricing of such insurance. We cannot be certain how this act will impact us or what additional cost to us, if any, could result. If such an event damaged or destroyed one or more of our properties, we could lose both our invested capital and anticipated profits from such property.
We disclose funds from operations and funds from operations, as adjusted, each a non-GAAP financial measure, in communications with investors, including documents filed with the SEC. However, funds from operations and funds from operations, as adjusted, are not equivalent to our net income or loss or cash flow from operations as determined under GAAP, and stockholders should consider GAAP measures to be more relevant to our operating performance.
We use, and we disclose to investors, funds from operations (“FFO”) and FFO, as adjusted, which are non-GAAP financial measures. FFO and FFO, as adjusted, are not equivalent to our net income or loss or cash flow from operations as determined in accordance with GAAP, and investors should consider GAAP measures to be more relevant in evaluating our operating performance and ability to pay distributions. FFO and FFO, as adjusted, differ from GAAP net income because FFO and FFO, as adjusted, exclude gains or losses from sales of property and asset impairment write downs, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. In determining FFO, as adjusted, we make further adjustments to FFO to exclude the effects of non-real estate related intangible amortization, acquisition related costs, contingent earnout expenses, accretion of fair value of debt adjustments, gains or losses from extinguishment of debt, accretion of deferred tax liabilities, realized and unrealized gains/losses on foreign exchange transactions, and gains/losses on foreign exchange and interest rate derivatives not designated for hedge accounting. FFO, as adjusted, also reflects adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and jointly owned investments.
Because of these differences, FFO and FFO, as adjusted, may not be accurate indicators of our operating performance, especially during periods in which we are acquiring properties. In addition, FFO and FFO, as adjusted, are not indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and investors should not consider FFO and FFO, as adjusted, as alternatives to cash flows from operations or an indication of our liquidity or of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Neither the SEC nor any other regulatory body has passed judgment on the acceptability of the adjustments that we use to calculate FFO and FFO, as adjusted. Also, because not all companies calculate FFO and FFO, as adjusted, the same way, comparisons with other companies may not be meaningful.
Costs of complying with governmental laws and regulations, including those relating to environmental matters, may adversely affect our income and the cash available for distribution.
All real property, including our self storage properties, and the operations conducted on real property are subject to federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and human health and safety. These laws and regulations generally govern wastewater discharges, air emissions, the operation and removal of underground and above-ground storage tanks, the use, storage, treatment, transportation, and disposal of solid and hazardous materials, and the remediation of contamination associated with disposals. Some of these laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on customers, owners, or operators for the costs to investigate or remediate contaminated properties, regardless of fault or whether the acts causing the contamination were legal. This liability could be substantial. In addition, the presence of hazardous substances, or the failure to properly remediate these substances, may adversely affect our ability to sell or rent a property, or to pledge such property as collateral for future borrowings.
Some of these laws and regulations have been amended so as to require compliance with new or more stringent standards as of future dates. Compliance with new or more stringent laws or regulations or stricter interpretation of existing laws may require us to incur material expenditures. Future laws, ordinances or regulations may impose material environmental liability. Additionally, our customers’ activities, the existing condition of land when we buy it, operations in the vicinity of our properties, such as the presence of underground storage tanks, or activities of unrelated third parties may affect our properties. In addition, there are various local, state, and federal fire, health, life-safety, and similar regulations with which we may be required to comply, and that may subject us to liability in the form of fines or damages for noncompliance. Any material expenditures, fines, or damages we must pay will reduce our ability to continue to pay distributions at the current rate to our stockholders and may reduce the value of our stockholders’ investments.
We cannot assure our stockholders that the independent third party environmental assessments we obtain prior to acquiring any properties we purchase will reveal all environmental liabilities or that a prior owner of a property did not create a material environmental condition not known to us. We cannot predict what other environmental legislation or regulations will be enacted in the future, how existing or future laws or regulations will be administered or interpreted, or what environmental conditions may be found to exist in the future. We cannot assure our stockholders that our business, assets,
23
results of operations, liquidity, or financial condition will not be adversely affected by these laws, which may adversely affect cash available for distribution, and the amount of distributions to our stockholders.
Our costs associated with complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act may affect cash available for distribution.
Our properties are subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or ADA. Under the ADA, all places of public accommodation are required to comply with federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. The ADA has separate compliance requirements for “public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” that generally require that buildings and services, including restaurants and retail stores, be made accessible and available to people with disabilities. The ADA’s requirements could require removal of access barriers and could result in the imposition of injunctive relief, monetary penalties, or, in some cases, an award of damages. We will attempt to acquire properties that comply with the ADA or place the burden on the seller or other third party to ensure compliance with the ADA. However, we cannot assure our stockholders that we will be able to acquire properties or allocate responsibilities in this manner. If we cannot, our funds used for ADA compliance may affect cash available for distribution and the amount of distributions to our stockholders.
If we sell properties by providing financing to purchasers, defaults by the purchasers would adversely affect our cash flows.
In some instances, we may sell our properties by providing financing to purchasers. When we provide financing to purchasers, we will bear the risk that the purchaser may default, which could negatively impact our cash distributions to stockholders. Additionally, the distribution of the proceeds of sales to our stockholders, or their reinvestment in other assets, will be delayed until the promissory notes or other property we may accept upon the sale are actually paid, sold, refinanced, or otherwise disposed of. In some cases, we may receive initial down payments in cash and other property in the year of sale in an amount less than the selling price and subsequent payments will be spread over a number of years. If any purchaser defaults under a financing arrangement with us, it could negatively impact our ability to continue to pay distributions at the current rate to our stockholders.
Property taxes may increase, which will adversely affect our net operating income and cash available for distributions.
Each of the properties we acquire will be subject to real property taxes. Some local real property tax assessors may seek to reassess some of our properties as a result of our acquisition of the property. From time to time, our property taxes may increase as property values or assessment rates change or for other reasons deemed relevant by the assessors. In addition, state or local governments may increase tax rates or assessment levels (See the risk factor immediately below). Increases in real property taxes will adversely affect our net operating income and cash available for distributions.
Our property taxes could increase due to reassessment or property tax rate changes.
Real property taxes on our properties may increase as our properties are reassessed by taxing authorities or as property tax rates change. For example, a current California law commonly referred to as Proposition 13 generally limits annual real estate tax increases on California properties to 2% of assessed value. Accordingly, the assessed value and resulting property tax we pay is less than it would be if the properties were assessed at current values. From time to time, proposals have been made to reduce the beneficial impact of Proposition 13, particularly with respect to commercial property, which would include self-storage facilities. Most recently, an initiative qualified for California’s November 2020 statewide ballot that would generally limit Proposition 13’s protections, generally only applicable to residential real estate. If this initiative passed, we believe it would end the beneficial effect of Proposition 13 for our properties, and our property tax expense could increase substantially, adversely affecting our cash flow from operations and net income. We cannot predict whether the foregoing initiative will pass or whether other changes to Proposition 13 may be proposed or adopted in the future.
Investments in properties or other real estate investments outside the United States subject us to foreign currency risks, which may adversely affect distributions and our REIT status.
Revenues generated from any properties or other real estate investments we acquire or ventures we enter into relating to transactions involving assets located in markets outside the United States likely will be denominated in the local currency. Therefore, any investments we make outside the United States may subject us to foreign currency risk due to potential fluctuations in exchange rates between foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar. As a result, changes in exchange rates of any such foreign currency to U.S. dollars may affect our revenues, operating margins, and distributions and may also affect the book value of our assets and the amount of stockholders’ equity.
24
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates used to value a REIT’s foreign assets may be considered changes in the value of the REIT’s assets. These changes may adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT. Further, bank accounts in foreign currency which are not considered cash or cash equivalents may adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT.
Changes in the Canadian Dollar/USD exchange rate could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and value of the investment of our stockholders.
We have purchased and may continue to purchase properties in Canada. In addition, our Managed REITs own properties in Canada where we, through our subsidiaries, serve as the property manager. As a result, our financial results may be adversely affected by fluctuations in the Canadian Dollar/USD exchange rate. We cannot predict with any certainty changes in foreign currency exchange rates or our ability to mitigate these risks. Several factors may affect the Canadian Dollar/USD exchange rate, including:
|
• |
sovereign debt levels and trade deficits; |
|
• |
domestic and foreign inflation rates and interest rates and investors’ expectations concerning those rates; |
|
• |
other currency exchange rates; |
|
• |
changing supply and demand for a particular currency; |
|
• |
monetary policies of governments; |
|
• |
changes in balances of payments and trade; |
|
• |
trade restrictions; |
|
• |
direct sovereign intervention, such as currency devaluations and revaluations; |
|
• |
investment and trading activities of mutual funds, hedge funds, and currency funds; and |
|
• |
other global or regional political, economic, or financial events and situations. |
These events and actions are unpredictable. In addition, the Canadian Dollar may not maintain its long term value in terms of purchasing power in the future. The resulting volatility in the Canadian Dollar/USD exchange rate could materially and adversely affect our performance.
We are subject to additional risks due to the location of any of the properties that we either own or operate in Canada.
In addition to currency exchange rates, the value of any properties we purchase in Canada may be affected by factors peculiar to the laws and business practices of Canada. Canadian laws and business practices may expose us to risks that are different from and in addition to those commonly found in the United States. Ownership and operation of foreign assets pose several risks, including, but not limited to the following:
|
• |
the burden of complying with both Canadian and United States’ laws; |
|
• |
changing governmental rules and policies, including changes in land use and zoning laws, more stringent environmental laws or changes in such laws; |
|
• |
existing or new Canadian laws relating to the foreign ownership of real property or loans and laws restricting the ability of Canadian persons or companies to remove profits earned from activities within the country to the person’s or company’s country of origin; |
|
• |
the potential for expropriation; |
|
• |
possible currency transfer restrictions; |
|
• |
imposition of adverse or confiscatory taxes; |
|
• |
changes in real estate and other tax rates or laws and changes in other operating expenses in Canada; |
|
• |
possible challenges to the anticipated tax treatment of our revenue and our properties; |
|
• |
adverse market conditions caused by terrorism, civil unrest and changes in national or local governmental or economic conditions; |
25
|
• |
the potential difficulty of enforcing obligations in other countries; |
|
• |
changes in the availability, cost, and terms of loan funds resulting from varying Canadian economic policies; and |
|
• |
our limited experience and expertise in foreign countries relative to our experience and expertise in the United States. |
Risks Associated with Debt Financing
We have broad authority to incur debt, and high debt levels could hinder our ability to continue to pay distributions at the current rate and could decrease the value of our stockholders’ investments.
Our board may approve unlimited levels of debt. High debt levels would cause us to incur higher interest charges, would result in higher debt service payments, and could be accompanied by restrictive covenants. These factors could limit the amount of cash we have available to distribute and could result in a decline in the value of our stockholders’ investments.
If we or the other parties to our loans breach covenants thereunder, such loan or loans could be deemed in default, which could accelerate our repayment date and materially adversely affect the value of our stockholders’ investment in us.
Certain of our loans are secured by first mortgages on some of our properties and other loans are secured by pledges of equity interests in the entities that own certain of our properties. Such loans also impose a number of financial or other covenant requirements on us. If we, or the other parties to these loans, should breach certain of those financial or other covenant requirements, or otherwise default on such loans, then the respective lenders, as the case may be, could accelerate our repayment dates. If we do not have sufficient cash to repay the applicable loan at that time, such lenders could foreclose on the property securing the applicable loan or take control of the pledged collateral, as the case may be. Such foreclosure could result in a material loss for us and would adversely affect the value of our stockholders’ investment in us. In addition, certain of these loans are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted with each other such that a default under one loan would cause a default under the other loans. See Note 6, Debt, for more information on such loans.
We have incurred and intend to continue to incur, mortgage indebtedness and other borrowings, which may increase our business risks.
We have placed, and intend to continue to place, permanent financing on our properties and we may obtain additional credit facilities or other similar financing arrangements in order to acquire additional properties. We may also decide to later further leverage our properties. We may incur mortgage debt and pledge all or some of our real properties as security for that debt to obtain funds to acquire real properties. If we default on our secured indebtedness, the lender may foreclose and we could lose our entire investment in the properties securing such loan, which could adversely affect distributions to our stockholders. To the extent lenders require us to cross-collateralize our properties, or our loan agreements contain cross-default provisions, a default under a single loan agreement could subject multiple properties to foreclosure.
In connection with the SSGT Mergers on January 24, 2019, we entered into a series of new loans (See Note 3 Real Estate Facilities —Merger with Strategic Storage Growth Trust, Inc., for more information on such loans). Accordingly, we may be subject to an increased risk that our cash flow could be insufficient to meet required payments on our debt. Our increased indebtedness as a result of the SSGT Mergers, compared to our level of indebtedness prior to the SSGT Mergers, could have important consequences to our stockholders, including:
|
• |
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; |
|
• |
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund future working capital, capital expenditures, and other general corporate requirements; |
|
• |
requiring the use of a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations for the payment of principal and interest on its indebtedness, thereby reducing our ability to use our cash flow to fund working capital, acquisitions, capital expenditures, and general corporate requirements; |
|
• |
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and industry; and |
|
• |
putting us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors with comparatively less indebtedness. |
In addition, we may borrow if we need funds to pay a desired distribution rate to our stockholders. We may also borrow if we deem it necessary or advisable to assure that we maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. If there is a shortfall between the cash flow from our properties and the cash flow needed to service mortgage debt, then the amount available for distribution to our stockholders may be reduced.
26
Our obligation to make balloon payments could increase the risk of default.
Our debt may have balloon payments of up to 100% of the principal amount of such loans due on the respective maturity dates. Thus, such debt will have a substantial payment due at the scheduled maturity date, unless previously prepaid or refinanced. Loans with a substantial remaining principal balance on their stated maturity involve greater degrees of risk of non-payment at stated maturity than fully amortizing loans. As a result, our ability to repay such loans on their respective maturity dates will largely depend upon our ability either to prepay such loans, refinance such loans or to sell, to the extent permitted, all or a portion of the properties encumbered by such loans, if any. Our ability to accomplish any of these goals will be affected by a number of factors at the time of attempted prepayment, refinancing, or sale, including, but not limited to: (i) the availability of, and competition for, credit for commercial real estate; (ii) prevailing interest rates; (iii) the net operating income generated by our properties; (iv) the fair market value of our properties; (v) our equity in our properties; (vi) our financial condition; (vii) the operating history and occupancy level of our properties; (viii) the tax laws; and (ix) the prevailing general and regional economic conditions.
Lenders have required and will likely continue to require us to enter into restrictive covenants relating to our operations, which could limit our ability to continue to pay distributions to our stockholders.
When providing financing, lenders often impose restrictions on us that affect our distribution and operating policies and our ability to incur additional debt. Loan documents we enter into may contain covenants that limit our ability to further mortgage the property or discontinue insurance coverage. We are also required to obtain the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock before entering into certain transactions. These or other limitations may adversely affect our flexibility and limit our ability to continue to pay distributions at the current rate to our stockholders. If the limits set forth in these covenants prevent us from satisfying our distribution requirements, we could fail to qualify for federal income tax purposes as a REIT. If the limits set forth in these covenants do not jeopardize our qualification for taxation as a REIT, but prevent us from distributing 100% of our REIT taxable income, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax, and potentially a nondeductible excise tax, on the retained amounts.
Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our debt payments and adversely affect our ability to continue to pay distributions at the current rate to our stockholders.
We currently have outstanding debt payments which are indexed to variable interest rates. We may also incur additional debt or issue additional preferred equity in the future which rely on variable interest rates. Increases in these variable interest rates in the future would increase our interest costs and preferred equity distribution payments, which would likely reduce our cash flows and our ability to continue to pay distributions at the current rate to our stockholders. In addition, if we need to make payments on instruments which contain variable interest during periods of rising interest rates, we could be required to liquidate one or more of our investments in properties at times that may not permit realization of the maximum return on such investments.
Disruptions in the credit markets could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Domestic and international financial markets have experienced significant disruptions in the past which were brought about in large part by failures in the U.S. banking system. These disruptions severely impacted the availability of credit and contributed to rising costs associated with obtaining credit. Future credit market disruptions, including those associated with the worldwide COVID-19 outbreak, may have similar effects or otherwise make obtaining additional and replacement external sources of liquidity more difficult and more costly, if available at all. If debt financing is not available on terms and conditions we find acceptable, we may not be able to obtain financing for investments. If these disruptions in the credit markets resurface, our ability to borrow monies to finance the purchase of, or other activities related to, real estate assets will be negatively impacted. If we are unable to borrow monies on terms and conditions that we find acceptable, we may be forced to use a greater proportion of our Offering proceeds to finance our acquisitions, reduce the number of properties we can purchase, and/or dispose of some of our assets. These disruptions could also adversely affect the return on the properties we do purchase. In addition, if we pay fees to lock in a favorable interest rate, falling interest rates or other factors could require us to forfeit these fees. All of these events would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and ability to pay distributions.
27
Risks Associated with Our Managed REIT Platform
Revenue and earnings from the Managed REITs are uncertain.
Increasing our revenue from the Managed REITs is dependent in large part on the ability to raise capital in offerings for existing or future Managed REITs or other future programs, as well as on our ability to make investments that meet the investment criteria of existing and future entities, both of which are subject to uncertainty with respect to capital market and real estate market conditions. This uncertainty could have an adverse impact on our earnings. Moreover, revenue generated from asset management fees, property management fees, and other fees and distributions relating to the Managed REITs’ offerings and the investment and management of their respective assets may be affected by factors that include not only our ability to increase the Managed REITs’ portfolio of properties under management, but also changes in valuation of those properties, sales of the Managed REIT properties and assets and our ability to successfully operate the Managed REIT properties.
The Managed REITs may not generate sufficient revenue or may incur significant debt, which either due to liquidity problems or restrictive covenants contained in their borrowing agreements could restrict their ability to pay or reimburse fees and expenses owed to us when due. In addition, the revenue payable by the Managed REITs is subject to certain limits set forth in their respective advisory agreements, which may limit the growth of our revenue. Furthermore, our ability to earn certain subordinated distributions from the Managed REITs is tied to providing liquidity events for the Managed REITs. Our ability to provide such liquidity events, and to do so under circumstances that will satisfy the applicable subordination requirements, will depend on market conditions at the relevant time, which may vary considerably over a period of years. If we are unable to satisfy such subordination requirements, certain equity interests we hold in the Managed REITs may be impaired.
Because the revenue streams from the advisory agreements with the Managed REITs are subject to limitation or cancellation, any such termination could adversely affect our financial condition, cash flow and the amount available for distributions to our common stockholders.
Our advisory agreement with the SST IV Advisor is renewable annually, and our advisory agreement with the SSGT II Advisor has an initial term of 10 years and is renewable annually thereafter, and each may generally be terminated by each Managed REIT, without cause or penalty, upon 60 days’ written notice. There can be no assurance that the advisory agreements will be renewed before they expire or that the advisory agreements will not be terminated. Any such non-renewal or termination could adversely affect our financial condition, cash flow and the amount available for distributions to our common stockholders.
We will face conflicts of interest relating to the purchase of properties, including conflicts with the Managed REITs, and there can be no assurance that our allocation policy will adequately address all of the conflicts that may arise or that it will address such conflicts in a manner that is more favorable to us than to the Managed REITs.
We own the entities that serve as the sponsor and advisor to the Managed REITs, which have investment objectives similar to ours, and we may be buying properties at the same time as one or more of the Managed REITs, or other programs managed by us, our officers, our key personnel or our subsidiaries (the “Other Programs”). Accordingly, we will have conflicts of interest in allocating potential properties, acquisition expenses, management time, services, and other functions between various existing enterprises or future enterprises with which the Managed REITs may be or become involved. SST IV, a public non-traded Managed REIT that invests in self storage properties had assets of approximately $288 million as of December 31, 2019, and SSGT II, a private Managed REIT that invests in self storage properties had assets of approximately $116 million as of December 31, 2019.
While we have adopted an investment allocation policy in an effort to appropriately allocate acquisitions among us, the Managed REITs and the Other Programs, there can be no assurance that such allocation policy will adequately address all of the conflicts that may arise or that it will address such conflicts in a manner that is more favorable to us than to the Managed REITs or the Other Programs. In addition, conflicts of interest may exist in the valuation of our investments and regarding decisions about the allocation of specific investment opportunities among us, the Managed REITs and the Other Programs and the allocation of fees and costs among us, the Managed REITs and the Other Programs. To the extent we fail to appropriately deal with any such conflicts, it could negatively impact our reputation and ability to raise additional funds or result in potential litigation against us.
28
A subsidiary of ours is the sponsor of the Managed REITs and may sponsor additional future programs. As a result, we could be subject to any litigation that may arise by investors in those entities or the respective operations of those entities.
In the course of their operations, the Managed REITs and the other future programs may be subject to lawsuits. We may be named in such lawsuits as the sponsor of such entities and may, in some instances, be found to be subject to liability. In such an instance, our ability to seek reimbursement or indemnification from such programs may be limited. If we are subject to significant legal expenses, it could have an adverse effect on our financial condition.
Federal Income Tax Risks
Failure to continue to qualify as a REIT would adversely affect our operations and our ability to continue to pay distributions at our current level as we will incur additional tax liabilities.
We believe we operate in a manner that allows us to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes under the Code. Qualification as a REIT involves highly technical and complex Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations. Our qualification as a REIT will depend upon our ability to meet, through investments, actual operating results, distributions and satisfaction of specific stockholder rules, the various tests imposed by the Code.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT for any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax and any applicable alternative minimum tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. If our REIT status is terminated for any reason, we would generally be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year of such termination. Losing our REIT status would reduce our net earnings available for investment or distribution to stockholders because of the additional tax liability. In addition, distributions to stockholders would no longer qualify for the distributions paid deduction, and we would no longer be required to make distributions. In addition, if we fail to qualify as a REIT, we may be required to repurchase the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. If this occurs, we might be required to borrow funds or liquidate some investments in order to pay the applicable tax and redeem holders of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock.
Qualification as a REIT is subject to the satisfaction of tax requirements and various factual matters and circumstances that are not entirely within our control. New legislation, regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could change the tax laws with respect to qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of being a REIT. Our failure to continue to qualify as a REIT would adversely affect the return of our stockholders’ investment.
To qualify as a REIT, and to avoid the payment of federal income and excise taxes and maintain our REIT status, we may be forced to borrow funds, use proceeds from the issuance of securities, or sell assets to pay distributions, which may result in our distributing amounts that may otherwise be used for our operations.
To obtain the favorable tax treatment accorded to REITs, we normally will be required each year to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, generally determined without regard to the deduction for distributions paid and by excluding net capital gains. We will be subject to federal income tax on our undistributed taxable income and net capital gain and subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on any amount by which distributions we pay with respect to any calendar year are less than the sum of (1) 85% of our ordinary income, (2) 95% of our capital gain net income, and (3) 100% of our undistributed income from prior years. These requirements could cause us to distribute amounts that otherwise would be spent on the acquisition, maintenance or development of properties and it is possible that we might be required to borrow funds, use proceeds from the issuance of securities or sell assets in order to distribute enough of our taxable income to maintain our REIT status and to avoid the payment of federal income and excise taxes. We may be required to make distributions to stockholders at times it would be more advantageous to reinvest cash in our business or when we do not have cash readily available for distribution, and we may be forced to liquidate assets on terms and at times unfavorable to us. These methods of obtaining funding could affect future distributions by increasing operating costs and decreasing available cash. In addition, such distributions may constitute a return of investor’s capital for federal income tax purposes.
Our stockholders may have tax liability on distributions they elect to reinvest in our common stock.
If our stockholders participate in our distribution reinvestment plan, our stockholders will be deemed to have received, and for income tax purposes will be taxed on, the amount reinvested in common stock to the extent the amount reinvested was not a tax-free return of capital. As a result, unless our stockholders are a tax-exempt entity, our stockholders may have to use funds from other sources to pay their tax liability on the value of the common stock received.
29
If any of our partnerships fails to maintain its status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, its income would be subject to taxation and our REIT status would be terminated.
We intend to maintain the status of our partnerships, including our Operating Partnership, as partnerships for federal income tax purposes. However, if the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) were to successfully challenge the status of any of our partnerships as a partnership, it would be taxable as a corporation. Such an event would reduce the amount of distributions that such partnership could make to us. This would also result in our losing REIT status and becoming subject to a corporate level tax on our own income. This would substantially reduce our cash available to pay distributions and the return on our stockholders’ investments. In addition, if any of the entities through which any of our partnerships owns its properties, in whole or in part, loses its characterization as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, it would be subject to taxation as a corporation, thereby reducing distributions to such partnership. Such a recharacterization of any of our partnerships or an underlying property owner could also threaten our ability to maintain REIT status.
In certain circumstances, we may be subject to federal and state income taxes as a REIT, which would reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
Even if we qualify and maintain our status as a REIT, we may be subject to federal income taxes or state taxes. For example, net income from a “prohibited transaction” will be subject to a 100% tax. We may not be able to make sufficient distributions to avoid excise taxes applicable to REITs. We may also decide to retain income we earn from the sale or other disposition of our property and pay income tax directly on such income. In that event, our stockholders would be treated as if they earned that income and paid the tax on it directly. However, stockholders that are tax-exempt, such as charities or qualified pension plans, would have no benefit from their deemed payment of such tax liability. We may also be subject to state and local taxes on our income or property, either directly, at the level of our Operating Partnership, or at the level of any other companies through which we indirectly own our assets. Any federal or state taxes we pay will reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
We may be required to pay some taxes due to actions of our taxable REIT subsidiaries, which would reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
Any net taxable income earned directly by our taxable REIT subsidiaries, or through entities that are disregarded for federal income tax purposes as entities separate from our taxable REIT subsidiaries, will be subject to federal and possibly state corporate income tax. We have elected to treat SmartStop TRS, Inc. as a taxable REIT subsidiary, and we may elect to treat other subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries in the future. In this regard, several provisions of the laws applicable to REITs and their subsidiaries ensure that a taxable REIT subsidiary will be subject to an appropriate level of federal income taxation. For example, a taxable REIT subsidiary is limited in its ability to deduct certain interest payments made to an affiliated REIT. In addition, the REIT has to pay a 100% penalty tax on some payments that it receives or on some deductions taken by a taxable REIT subsidiary if the economic arrangements between the REIT, the REIT’s customers, and the taxable REIT subsidiary are not comparable to similar arrangements between unrelated parties. Finally, some state and local jurisdictions may tax some of our income even though as a REIT we are not subject to federal income tax on that income, because not all states and localities follow the federal income tax treatment of REITs. To the extent that we and our affiliates are required to pay federal, state, and local taxes, we will have less cash available for distributions to our stockholders.
Distributions to tax-exempt investors may be classified as unrelated business taxable income.
Neither ordinary nor capital gain distributions with respect to our common stock, nor gain from the sale of common stock, should generally constitute unrelated business taxable income (“UBTI”) to a tax-exempt investor. However, there are certain exceptions to this rule. In particular:
|
• |
part of the income and gain recognized by certain qualified employee pension trusts with respect to our common stock may be treated as UBTI if shares of our common stock are predominately held by qualified employee pension trusts, and we are required to rely on a special look-through rule for purposes of meeting one of the REIT share ownership tests, and we are not operated in a manner to avoid treatment of such income or gain as UBTI; |
|
• |
part of the income and gain recognized by a tax-exempt investor with respect to our common stock would constitute UBTI if the investor incurs debt in order to acquire the common stock; and |
|
• |
part or all of the income or gain recognized with respect to our common stock by social clubs, voluntary employee benefit associations, supplemental unemployment benefit trusts and qualified group legal services |
30
|
plans which are exempt from federal income taxation under Sections 501(c)(7), (9), (17), or (20) of the Code may be treated as UBTI. |
Complying with the REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities.
To qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of shares of our common stock. We may be required to make distributions to stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution, or we may be required to liquidate otherwise attractive investments in order to comply with the REIT tests. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.
Legislative or regulatory action could adversely affect investors.
Individuals with incomes below certain thresholds are subject to taxation at a 15% qualified dividend rate. For those with income above such thresholds, the qualified dividend rate is 20%. These tax rates are generally not applicable to distributions paid by a REIT, unless such distributions represent earnings on which the REIT itself has been taxed. As a result, distributions (other than capital gain distributions) we pay to individual investors generally will be subject to the tax rates that are otherwise applicable to ordinary income for federal income tax purposes, subject to a 20% deduction for REIT dividends available under “An Act to provide reconciliation pursuant to titles II and V of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2018” (the “2017 Tax Act”). This disparity in tax treatment may make an investment in our shares comparatively less attractive to individual investors than an investment in the shares of non-REIT corporations, and could have an adverse effect on the value of our common stock. Our stockholders are urged to consult with their own tax advisor with respect to the impact of recent legislation on their investment in our common stock and the status of legislative, regulatory, or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our common stock.
Foreign purchasers of our common stock may be subject to FIRPTA tax upon the sale of their shares.
A foreign person disposing of a U.S. real property interest, including shares of a U.S. corporation whose assets consist principally of U.S. real property interests, is generally subject to a tax, known as FIRPTA tax, on the gain recognized on the disposition. Such FIRPTA tax does not apply, however, to the disposition of stock in a REIT if the REIT is “domestically controlled.” A REIT is “domestically controlled” if less than 50% of the REIT’s stock, by value, has been owned directly or indirectly by persons who are not qualifying U.S. persons during a continuous five-year period ending on the date of disposition or, if shorter, during the entire period of the REIT’s existence.
We cannot assure our stockholders that we will qualify as a “domestically controlled” REIT. If we were to fail to so qualify, gain realized by foreign investors on a sale of our shares would be subject to FIRPTA tax, unless our shares were traded on an established securities market and the foreign investor did not at any time during a specified testing period directly or indirectly own more than 10% of the value of our outstanding common stock.
ERISA Risks
There are special considerations that apply to qualified pension or profit-sharing trusts or IRAs investing in our shares which could cause an investment in our company to be a prohibited transaction and could result in additional tax consequences.
If our stockholders are investing the assets of a qualified pension, profit-sharing, 401(k), Keogh, or other qualified retirement plan or the assets of an IRA in our common stock, they should satisfy themselves that, among other things:
|
• |
their investment is consistent with their fiduciary obligations under ERISA and the Code; |
|
• |
their investment is made in accordance with the documents and instruments governing their plan or IRA, including their plan’s investment policy; |
|
• |
their investment satisfies the prudence and diversification requirements of ERISA; |
|
• |
their investment will not impair the liquidity of the plan or IRA; |
|
• |
their investment will not produce UBTI for the plan or IRA; |
|
• |
they will be able to value the assets of the plan annually in accordance with ERISA requirements; and |
31
|
• |
their investment will not constitute a prohibited transaction under Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code. |
Persons investing the assets of employee benefit plans, IRAs, and other tax-favored benefit accounts should consider ERISA and related risks of investing in the shares.
ERISA and Code Section 4975 prohibit certain transactions that involve (1) certain pension, profit-sharing, employee benefit, or retirement plans or individual retirement accounts and Keogh plans, and (2) any person who is a “party-in-interest” or “disqualified person” with respect to such a plan. Consequently, the fiduciary of a plan contemplating an investment in the shares should consider whether we, any other person associated with the issuance of the shares, or any of their affiliates is or might become a “party-in-interest” or “disqualified person” with respect to the plan and, if so, whether an exemption from such prohibited transaction rules is applicable. In addition, the Department of Labor (“DOL”) plan asset regulations provide that, subject to certain exceptions, the assets of an entity in which a plan holds an equity interest may be treated as assets of an investing plan, in which event the underlying assets of such entity (and transactions involving such assets) would be subject to the prohibited transaction provisions. We intend to take such steps as may be necessary to qualify us for one or more of the exemptions available, and thereby prevent our assets as being treated as assets of any investing plan.
ITEM 1B. |
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
None.
ITEM 2. |
PROPERTIES |
As of December 31, 2019, we owned 111 operating self storage facilities and one facility under development located in 17 states (Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, Texas and Washington) and Ontario, Canada (the Greater Toronto Area) comprising of approximately 72,000 units and approximately 8.2 million rentable square feet. See Note 6 – Debt, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report for more information about our indebtedness secured by our properties.
32
As of December 31, 2019, we owned the following 112 self storage properties and two parcels of land:
Property |
|
Acquisition Date |
|
Allocated Purchase Price |
|
|
Year Built |
|
Approx. Units(1) |
|
|
Approx. Sq. Ft. (net)(2) |
|
|
% of Total Rentable Sq. Ft. |
|
|
Physical Occupancy %(3) |
|
|||||
Morrisville - NC |
|
11/3/2014 |
|
$ |
2,442,000 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
36,900 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
79.8 |
% |
Cary - NC |
|
11/3/2014 |
|
|
4,398,500 |
|
|
1998/2005/2006 |
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
62,100 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
80.6 |
% |
Raleigh - NC |
|
11/3/2014 |
|
|
3,763,500 |
|
|
1999 |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
60,600 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
88.0 |
% |
Myrtle Beach I - SC |
|
11/3/2014 |
|
|
6,052,000 |
|
|
1998/2005-2007 |
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
100,100 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
84.6 |
% |
Myrtle Beach II - SC |
|
11/3/2014 |
|
|
5,444,000 |
|
|
1999/2006 |
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
94,500 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
87.4 |
% |
La Verne - CA |
|
1/23/2015 |
|
|
4,166,875 |
|
|
1986 |
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
49,800 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
94.2 |
% |
Chico - CA |
|
1/23/2015 |
|
|
1,826,875 |
|
|
1984 |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
38,800 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
91.4 |
% |
Riverside - CA |
|
1/23/2015 |
|
|
2,806,875 |
|
|
1985 |
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
61,000 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
89.2 |
% |
Fairfield - CA |
|
1/23/2015 |
|
|
3,926,875 |
|
|
1984 |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
41,000 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
85.9 |
% |
Littleton - CO |
|
1/23/2015 |
|
|
4,346,875 |
|
|
1985 |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
45,800 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
78.2 |
% |
Crestwood - IL |
|
1/23/2015 |
|
|
2,486,875 |
|
|
1987 |
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
49,300 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
93.3 |
% |
Forestville - MD |
|
1/23/2015 |
|
|
6,696,875 |
|
|
1988 |
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
55,200 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
84.7 |
% |
Upland - CA |
|
1/29/2015 |
|
|
6,276,875 |
|
|
1979 |
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
56,500 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
91.6 |
% |
Lancaster - CA |
|
1/29/2015 |
|
|
1,806,875 |
|
|
1980 |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
64,700 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
87.7 |
% |
Santa Rosa - CA |
|
1/29/2015 |
|
|
10,466,875 |
|
|
1979-1981 |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
116,400 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
83.1 |
% |
Vallejo - CA |
|
1/29/2015 |
|
|
5,286,875 |
|
|
1981 |
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
54,400 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
90.1 |
% |
Federal Heights - CO |
|
1/29/2015 |
|
|
4,746,875 |
|
|
1983 |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
40,600 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
88.1 |
% |
Santa Ana - CA |
|
2/5/2015 |
|
|
9,276,875 |
|
|
1978 |
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
84,500 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
88.9 |
% |
La Habra - CA |
|
2/5/2015 |
|
|
4,606,875 |
|
|
1981 |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
51,400 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
94.0 |
% |
Monterey Park - CA |
|
2/5/2015 |
|
|
4,426,875 |
|
|
1987 |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
31,200 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
89.8 |
% |
Huntington Beach - CA |
|
2/5/2015 |
|
|
10,876,875 |
|
|
1986 |
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
61,000 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
92.3 |
% |
Lompoc - CA |
|
2/5/2015 |
|
|
4,036,875 |
|
|
1982 |
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
46,500 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
92.5 |
% |
Aurora - CO |
|
2/5/2015 |
|
|
7,336,875 |
|
|
1984 |
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
87,400 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
85.4 |
% |
Everett - WA |
|
2/5/2015 |
|
|
5,196,875 |
|
|
1986 |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
48,100 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
85.0 |
% |
Whittier - CA |
|
2/19/2015 |
|
|
5,916,875 |
|
|
1989 |
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
58,600 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
88.5 |
% |
Bloomingdale - IL |
|
2/19/2015 |
|
|
4,996,874 |
|
|
1987 |
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
58,200 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
90.7 |
% |
Warren I - MI |
|
5/8/2015 |
|
|
3,436,875 |
|
|
1996 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
63,100 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
90.9 |
% |
Warren II - MI |
|
5/8/2015 |
|
|
3,636,875 |
|
|
1987 |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
52,100 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
89.7 |
% |
Troy - MI |
|
5/8/2015 |
|
|
4,816,875 |
|
|
1988 |
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
82,200 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
87.6 |
% |
Sterling Heights - MI |
|
5/21/2015 |
|
|
3,856,875 |
|
|
1977 |
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
63,600 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
84.2 |
% |
Beverly - NJ |
|
5/28/2015 |
|
|
2,176,875 |
|
|
1988 |
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
51,000 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
84.6 |
% |
Foley - AL |
|
9/11/2015 |
|
|
7,965,000 |
|
|
1985/1996/2006 |
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
159,000 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
83.7 |
% |
Tampa - FL |
|
11/3/2015 |
|
|
3,162,500 |
|
|
1985 |
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
50,100 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
84.4 |
% |
Boynton Beach – FL |
|
1/7/2016 |
|
|
17,900,000 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
74,800 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
88.2 |
% |
Lancaster II – CA |
|
1/11/2016 |
|
|
4,650,000 |
|
|
1991 |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
86,200 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
91.5 |
% |
Milton—TOR—CAN(4) |
|
2/11/2016 |
|
|
9,555,220 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
70,100 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
89.8 |
% |
Burlington I—TOR—CAN(4) |
|
2/11/2016 |
|
|
13,910,898 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
79,700 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
91.1 |
% |
Oakville I—TOR—CAN(4) |
|
2/11/2016 |
|
|
15,727,674 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
82,400 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
87.5 |
% |
Oakville II—TOR—CAN(4) |
|
2/29/2016 |
|
|
12,913,885 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
92,700 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
93.3 |
% |
Burlington II—TOR—CAN(4) |
|
2/29/2016 |
|
|
8,452,983 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
54,800 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
88.9 |
% |
Xenia – OH |
|
4/20/2016 |
|
|
3,147,807 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
57,800 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
93.7 |
% |
Sidney – OH |
|
4/20/2016 |
|
|
2,202,491 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
54,400 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
79.7 |
% |
Troy – OH |
|
4/20/2016 |
|
|
2,923,660 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
59,200 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
88.6 |
% |
Greenville – OH |
|
4/20/2016 |
|
|
2,124,526 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
46,700 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
82.7 |
% |
Washington Court House - OH |
|
4/20/2016 |
|
|
2,309,691 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
54,200 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
91.1 |
% |
Richmond – IN |
|
4/20/2016 |
|
|
3,362,209 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
64,700 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
85.0 |
% |
Connersville – IN |
|
4/20/2016 |
|
|
1,929,616 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
47,400 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
91.1 |
% |
Port St. Lucie I – FL |
|
4/29/2016 |
|
|
9,300,000 |
|
|
1999 |
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
59,000 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
89.9 |
% |
Sacramento – CA |
|
5/9/2016 |
|
|
8,150,000 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
62,200 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
87.4 |
% |
Oakland – CA |
|
5/18/2016 |
|
|
12,912,774 |
|
|
1979 |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
67,200 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
90.9 |
% |
Concord – CA |
|
5/18/2016 |
|
|
36,937,226 |
|
|
1988/1998 |
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
157,400 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
86.6 |
% |
Pompano Beach – FL |
|
6/1/2016 |
|
|
21,286,482 |
|
|
1979 |
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
115,600 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
87.6 |
% |
Lake Worth – FL |
|
6/1/2016 |
|
|
23,584,455 |
|
|
1998/2003 |
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
126,800 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
91.2 |
% |
Jupiter – FL |
|
6/1/2016 |
|
|
27,434,567 |
|
|
1992/2012 |
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
93,600 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
93.4 |
% |
Royal Palm Beach – FL |
|
6/1/2016 |
|
|
25,539,747 |
|
|
2001/2003 |
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
111,000 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
92.1 |
% |
Port St. Lucie II – FL |
|
6/1/2016 |
|
|
14,059,963 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
108,000 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
90.2 |
% |
Wellington – FL |
|
6/1/2016 |
|
|
22,677,360 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
86,700 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
90.6 |
% |
Doral – FL |
|
6/1/2016 |
|
|
23,594,533 |
|
|
1998 |
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
106,000 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
87.8 |
% |
33
Plantation - FL |
|
6/1/2016 |
|
|
33,250,050 |
|
|
2002/2012 |
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
89,800 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
85.7 |
% |
Naples – FL |
|
6/1/2016 |
|
|
25,297,855 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
80,800 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
88.3 |
% |
Delray – FL |
|
6/1/2016 |
|
|
31,073,023 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
135,700 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
92.1 |
% |
Baltimore – MD |
|
6/1/2016 |
|
|
27,101,965 |
|
|
1990/2014 |
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
117,700 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
83.8 |
% |
Sonoma – CA |
|
6/14/2016 |
|
|
7,425,000 |
|
|
1984 |
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
44,600 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
93.8 |
% |
Las Vegas I – NV |
|
7/28/2016 |
|
|
13,935,000 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
106,800 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
86.3 |
% |
Las Vegas II – NV |
|
9/23/2016 |
|
|
14,200,000 |
|
|
2000 |
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
101,400 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
88.5 |
% |
Las Vegas III – NV |
|
9/27/2016 |
|
|
9,250,000 |
|
|
1989 |
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
82,200 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
90.2 |
% |
Asheville I – NC |
|
12/30/2016 |
|
|
15,094,379 |
|
|
1988/2005/2015 |
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
95,600 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
85.6 |
% |
Asheville II – NC |
|
12/30/2016 |
|
|
5,010,839 |
|
|
1984 |
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
43,400 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
91.6 |
% |
Hendersonville I – NC |
|
12/30/2016 |
|
|
4,639,666 |
|
|
1982 |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
39,400 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
82.6 |
% |
Asheville III – NC |
|
12/30/2016 |
|
|
9,970,126 |
|
|
1991/2002 |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
55,400 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
90.3 |
% |
Arden – NC |
|
12/30/2016 |
|
|
12,362,131 |
|
|
1973 |
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
75,100 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
85.1 |
% |
Asheville IV – NC |
|
12/30/2016 |
|
|
9,238,090 |
|
|
1985/1986/2005 |
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
58,300 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
86.0 |
% |
Asheville V – NC |
|
12/30/2016 |
|
|
10,485,644 |
|
|
1978/2009/2014 |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
98,100 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
83.7 |
% |
Asheville VI – NC |
|
12/30/2016 |
|
|
6,629,567 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
45,500 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
89.0 |
% |
Asheville VII – NC |
|
12/30/2016 |
|
|
3,031,249 |
|
|
1999 |
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
26,700 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
90.1 |
% |
Asheville VIII – NC |
|
12/30/2016 |
|
|
8,145,191 |
|
|
1968/2002 |
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
54,000 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
91.5 |
% |
Hendersonville II – NC |
|
12/30/2016 |
|
|
7,794,638 |
|
|
1989/2003 |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
71,000 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
86.8 |
% |
Sweeten Creek Land – NC |
|
12/30/2016 |
|
|
348,480 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
— |
|
Highland Center Land – NC |
|
12/30/2016 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
— |
|
Aurora II - CO |
|
1/11/2017 |
|
|
10,100,000 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
53,400 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
84.7 |
% |
Dufferin—TOR—CAN(4) |
|
2/1/2017 |
|
|
24,084,283 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
122,700 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
90.0 |
% |
Mavis—TOR—CAN(4) |
|
2/1/2017 |
|
|
20,519,378 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
99,900 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
86.5 |
% |
Brewster—TOR—CAN(4) |
|
2/1/2017 |
|
|
14,575,304 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
90,600 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
88.0 |
% |
Granite—TOR—CAN(4) |
|
2/1/2017 |
|
|
12,103,738 |
|
|
1998/2016 |
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
80,700 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
88.3 |
% |
Centennial—TOR—CAN(4) |
|
2/1/2017 |
|
|
13,143,182 |
|
|
2016/2017 |
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
66,500 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
86.5 |
% |
Ft. Pierce—FL |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
14,354,480 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
88,400 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
90.6 |
% |
Russell Blvd , Las Vegas—NV |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
19,828,734 |
|
|
1999 |
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
171,100 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
91.8 |
% |
Jones Blvd, Las Vegas—NV |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
15,373,185 |
|
|
1996 |
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
|
89,000 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
94.1 |
% |
Airport Rd, Colorado Springs—CO |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
9,178,635 |
|
|
1983 |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
61,800 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
90.2 |
% |
Riverside—CA |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
8,746,457 |
|
|
1980 |
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
60,100 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
84.1 |
% |
Stockton—CA |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
8,993,416 |
|
|
1984 |
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
49,100 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
93.3 |
% |
Azusa—CA |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
14,200,131 |
|
|
1986 |
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
64,400 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
85.0 |
% |
Romeoville—IL |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
7,110,355 |
|
|
1986 |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
66,700 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
90.1 |
% |
Elgin—IL |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
4,311,489 |
|
|
1986 |
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
49,600 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
88.8 |
% |
San Antonio I—TX |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
11,421,844 |
|
|
1998 |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
76,700 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
91.7 |
% |
Kingwood—TX |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
10,804,447 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
60,100 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
86.7 |
% |
Aurora—CO |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
8,015,871 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
59,500 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
91.5 |
% |
Stoney Creek—TOR—CAN(4) |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
11,052,086 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
81,600 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
68.4 |
% |
Torbarrie—TOR—CAN(4) |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
8,084,824 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
— |
|
Baseline—AZ |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
13,407,805 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
94,000 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
95.1 |
% |
3173 Sweeten Creek Rd, Asheville—NC |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
10,135,600 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
72,000 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
59.2 |
% |
Elk Grove—IL |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
8,859,647 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
82,000 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
91.6 |
% |
Garden Grove—CA |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
22,483,541 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
960 |
|
|
|
95,000 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
91.0 |
% |
Deaverview Rd, Asheville—NC |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
6,215,130 |
|
|
1992 |
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
58,600 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
88.2 |
% |
Highland Center Blvd, Asheville—NC |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
6,925,136 |
|
|
1994 |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
66,600 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
89.7 |
% |
Sarasota—FL |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
8,869,937 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
48,000 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
88.1 |
% |
Mount Pleasant—SC |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
7,274,995 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
48,000 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
71.3 |
% |
Nantucket—MA |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
41,550,818 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
93,000 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
84.4 |
% |
Pembroke Pines—FL |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
18,172,052 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
84,000 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
75.6 |
% |
Riverview—FL |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
9,302,115 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
54,000 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
65.5 |
% |
Eastlake—CA |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
18,604,230 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
86,000 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
76.3 |
% |
McKinney—TX |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
12,008,372 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
94,000 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
93.6 |
% |
Hualapai Way, Las Vegas—NV |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
10,187,050 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
73,000 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
69.1 |
% |
Riggs Rd — Gilbert |
|
7/11/2019 |
|
|
10,430,942 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
96,700 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
25.4 |
% |
Totals |
|
|
|
$ |
1,194,016,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
71,705 |
|
|
|
8,237,600 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
86.7 |
% |
(1) |
Includes all rentable units, consisting of storage units and parking (approximately 2,400 units). |
(2) |
Includes all rentable square feet consisting of storage units and parking (approximately 695,000 square feet). |
34
(3) |
Represents the occupied square feet divided by total rentable square feet as of December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2019, the following properties were not physically and/or economically stabilized: Sarasota, Mount Pleasant, Pembroke Pines, Riverview, Eastlake, 3173 Sweeten Creek Rd—Asheville, Stoney Creek, Hualapai Way—Las Vegas and Gilbert. Excluding these properties, our physical occupancy as of December 31, 2019 was approximately 88.6%. |
(4) |
These properties are located in Ontario, Canada (Greater Toronto Area). |
As of December 31, 2019, our self storage portfolio was comprised as follows:
State |
|
No. of Properties |
|
|
Units(1) |
|
|
Sq. Ft. (net)(2) |
|
|
% of Total Rentable Sq. Ft. |
|
|
Physical Occupancy %(3) |
|
|
|
Rental Income %(4) |
|
||||||
Alabama |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
159,000 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
83.7 |
% |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
Arizona |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
190,700 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
59.0 |
% |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
California |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
15,230 |
|
|
|
1,588,000 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
88.6 |
% |
|
|
|
23.8 |
% |
Colorado |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3,190 |
|
|
|
348,500 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
86.8 |
% |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
Florida |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
13,260 |
|
|
|
1,512,300 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
87.8 |
% |
|
|
|
21.4 |
% |
Illinois |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2,920 |
|
|
|
305,800 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
91.0 |
% |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Indiana |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
112,100 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
87.6 |
% |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
Massachusetts |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
93,000 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
84.4 |
% |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
Maryland |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
172,900 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
84.1 |
% |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
Michigan |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2,180 |
|
|
|
261,000 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
88.0 |
% |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
New Jersey |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
51,000 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
84.6 |
% |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
Nevada |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5,040 |
|
|
|
623,500 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
88.1 |
% |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
North Carolina |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
7,230 |
|
|
|
1,019,300 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
% |
|
|
84.7 |
% |
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
Ohio |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2,210 |
|
|
|
272,300 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
87.4 |
% |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
South Carolina |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,920 |
|
|
|
242,600 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
83.1 |
% |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
Texas |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,690 |
|
|
|
230,800 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
91.2 |
% |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
Washington |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
48,100 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
85.0 |
% |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
Ontario, Canada(5) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
9,540 |
|
|
|
1,006,700 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
87.3 |
% |
|
|
|
13.0 |
% |
Total |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
71,705 |
|
|
|
8,237,600 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
86.7 |
% |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
(1) |
Includes all rentable units, consisting of storage units and parking (approximately 2,400 units). |
(2) |
Includes all rentable square feet, consisting of storage units and parking (approximately 695,000 square feet). |
(3) |
Represents the occupied square feet of all facilities we owned in a state or province divided by total rentable square feet of all the facilities we owned in such state or area as of December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2019, the following properties were not physically and/or economically stabilized: Sarasota, Mount Pleasant, Pembroke Pines, Riverview, Eastlake, 3173 Sweeten Creek Rd—Asheville, Stoney Creek, Hualapai Way—Las Vegas and Gilbert. Excluding these properties, our physical occupancy as of December 31, 2019 was approximately 88.6%. |
(4) |
Represents rental income (excludes administrative fees, late fees, and other ancillary income) for all facilities we owned in a state or province divided by our total rental income for the month ended December 31, 2019. |
(5) |
Our Torbarrie property in Toronto, Canada is a self storage property under construction as of December 31, 2019. The property partially opened in March 2020. |
In connection with the Self Administration Transaction, we acquired an office condominium for approximately $6.5 million located at 10 Terrace Rd, Ladera Ranch, California (the “Ladera Office”) which houses our corporate headquarters.
ITEM 3. |
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
|
(a) |
From time to time, we may become subject to legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. As of December 31, 2019, we were not party to any material legal proceedings, nor were we aware of any such legal proceedings contemplated by governmental authorities. |
|
(b) |
None. |
ITEM 4. |
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES |
Not Applicable.
35
PART II
ITEM 5. |
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
Market Information
As of March 25, 2020, we had approximately 51.7 million shares of Class A common stock outstanding and approximately 7.7 million shares of Class T common stock outstanding, held by a total of approximately 12,500 stockholders of record.
There is no established trading market for our common stock. Therefore, there is a risk that a stockholder may not be able to sell our stock at a time or price acceptable to the stockholder, or at all. Our Offering terminated on January 9, 2017. As of now, we only offer Class A and Class T shares pursuant to our DRP Offering, both of which are offered at a price of $10.66 per share. Pursuant to the terms of our charter, certain restrictions are imposed on the ownership and transfer of shares.
Unless and until our shares are listed for trading on a national securities exchange, it is not expected that a public market for our shares will develop. To assist fiduciaries of plans subject to the annual reporting requirements of ERISA and account trustees or custodians to prepare reports relating to an investment in our shares, we intend to provide reports of our quarterly and annual determinations of the current value of our net assets per outstanding share to those fiduciaries (including account trustees and custodians) who identify themselves to us and request the reports.
Determination of Estimated Per Share Net Asset Value
On June 26, 2019, our board of directors, upon the recommendation of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Committee”), approved an estimated net asset value per share (“Estimated Per Share NAV”) of our common stock of $10.66 for our Class A Shares and Class T Shares based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities, or net asset value, divided by the approximate number of shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis, calculated as of March 31, 2019.
We provided this Estimated Per Share NAV to assist broker-dealers in connection with their obligations under applicable Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) rules with respect to customer account statements and to assist fiduciaries in discharging their obligations under Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) reporting requirements. This valuation was performed in accordance with the provisions of the Investment Program Association Practice Guideline 2013-01, Valuations of Publicly Registered Non-Listed REITs, in April 2013 (the “IPA Valuation Guidelines”). Our board of directors previously approved an estimated value per share of our Class A shares and Class T shares of $10.65 as of December 31, 2017.
The Committee, comprised of our three independent directors, was responsible for the oversight of the valuation process, including the review and approval of the valuation process and methodology used to determine our Estimated Per Share NAV, the consistency of the valuation and appraisal methodologies with real estate industry standards and practices, and the reasonableness of the assumptions used in the valuations and appraisals.
The Estimated Per Share NAV was determined after consultation with our Former External Advisor and Robert A. Stanger & Co, Inc. (“Stanger”), an independent third-party valuation firm. The engagement of Stanger was approved by the Committee. Stanger prepared an appraisal report (the “Stanger Appraisal Report”) summarizing key information and assumptions and providing an appraised value on 112 of the 113 properties (the “Stanger Appraised Properties”) in our portfolio as of March 31, 2019. Stanger also prepared a net asset value report (the “Stanger NAV Report”) which estimates the net asset value per share of each of our Class A common stock and Class T common stock as of March 31, 2019. The Stanger NAV Report relied upon: (i) the Stanger Appraisal Report for the Stanger Appraised Properties; (ii) the pending disposition price for the Borden Park property, pursuant to a purchase and sale agreement, net of our Former External Advisor’s estimated transaction costs; (iii) Stanger’s estimated value of our secured notes payable; (iv) Stanger’s estimate of our Former External Advisor’s subordinated participation in net sale proceeds due upon liquidation of our portfolio; and (v) our Former External Advisor’s estimate of the value of our other assets and liabilities, to calculate an estimated net asset value per share of our common stock. The process for estimating the value of our assets and liabilities was performed in accordance with the provisions of the IPA Valuation Guidelines.
36
Upon the Committee’s receipt and review of the Stanger Appraisal Report and the Stanger NAV Report (the “Reports”), the Committee recommended $10.66 as the Estimated Per Share NAV of each of our Class A common stock and Class T common stock as of March 31, 2019 to the board of directors. Upon the board of directors’ receipt and review of the Reports and recommendation of the Committee, the board of directors approved $10.66 as the Estimated Per Share NAV of each of our Class A common stock and Class T common stock as of March 31, 2019.
The table below sets forth the calculation of our Estimated Per Share NAV as of March 31, 2019 and our previous estimated value per share as of December 31, 2017:
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
||
Assets |
|
2019 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||
Real Estate Properties |
|
$ |
1,401,326,048 |
|
|
$ |
999,660,000 |
|
Additional assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
13,929,024 |
|
|
|
7,355,422 |
|
Restricted Cash |
|
|
5,957,748 |
|
|
|
4,512,990 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
5,354,187 |
|
|
|
5,050,740 |
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
1,426,567,007 |
|
|
$ |
1,016,579,152 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
$ |
775,218,482 |
|
|
$ |
397,507,764 |
|
Mark-to-market on mortgage debt |
|
|
3,989,306 |
|
|
|
(5,648,067 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
13,790,985 |
|
|
|
7,451,848 |
|
Due to affiliates |
|
|
217,193 |
|
|
|
403,904 |
|
Incentive distribution |
|
|
5,616,134 |
|
|
|
4,491,853 |
|
Distributions payable |
|
|
2,922,647 |
|
|
|
2,852,100 |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
$ |
801,754,747 |
|
|
$ |
407,059,402 |
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$ |
624,812,260 |
|
|
$ |
609,519,750 |
|
Net Asset Value for Class A shares |
|
$ |
544,207,162 |
|
|
$ |
531,251,035 |
|
Number of Class A shares outstanding(1) |
|
|
51,055,712 |
|
|
|
49,889,289 |
|
Estimated value per Class A share |
|
$ |
10.66 |
|
|
$ |
10.65 |
|
Net Asset Value for Class T shares |
|
$ |
80,605,097 |
|
|
$ |
78,268,715 |
|
Number of Class T shares outstanding |
|
|
7,562,103 |
|
|
|
7,350,142 |
|
Estimated value per Class T share |
|
$ |
10.66 |
|
|
$ |
10.65 |
|
(1) |
Includes outstanding units in our operating partnership (“OP Units”) and unvested restricted stock issued to our independent directors. |
Methodology and Key Assumptions
In determining the Estimated Per Share NAV, the board of directors considered the recommendation of the Committee, the Reports provided by Stanger and information provided by our Former Advisor. Our goal in calculating the Estimated Per Share NAV was to arrive at a value that is reasonable and supportable using what the Committee and the board of directors each deems to be appropriate valuation methodologies and assumptions.
FINRA’s current rules provide no guidance on the methodology an issuer must use to determine its Estimated Per Share NAV. As with any valuation methodology, the methodologies used are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that may not be accurate or complete. Different parties with different assumptions and estimates could derive a different Estimated Per Share NAV, and these differences could be significant. The Estimated Per Share NAV is not audited and does not represent the fair value of our assets less our liabilities according to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), nor does it represent a liquidation value of our assets and liabilities or the amount our shares of common stock would trade at on a national securities exchange. The estimated asset values may not, however, represent current market value or book value. The estimated value of the Stanger Appraised Properties do not necessarily represent the value we would receive or accept if the assets were marketed for sale. The Estimated Per Share NAV does not reflect a discount for the fact that we were, at the time of the calculation, externally managed, nor does it reflect a real estate portfolio premium or discount compared to the sum of the individual property values. The Estimated Per Share NAV also does not take into account estimated disposition costs and fees for real estate properties that are not held for sale.
37
Independent Valuation Firm
Stanger was selected by the Committee to appraise and provide a value on the 112 Stanger Appraised Properties. Stanger is engaged in the business of appraising commercial real estate properties and is not affiliated with us or our Former Advisor. The compensation we paid to Stanger related to the valuation is based on the scope of work and not on the appraised values of our real estate properties. The appraisals were performed in accordance with the Code of Ethics and the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, or USPAP, the real estate appraisal industry standards created by The Appraisal Foundation. The Stanger Appraisal Report was reviewed, approved, and signed by an individual with the professional designation of MAI licensed in the state where each real property is located. The use of the reports is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. In preparing its Reports, Stanger did not, and was not requested to, solicit third-party indications of interest for our common stock in connection with possible purchases thereof or the acquisition of all or any part of our company.
Stanger collected reasonably available material information that it deemed relevant in appraising our real estate properties. Stanger relied in part on property-level information provided by our Former Advisor, including: (i) historical and projected operating revenues and expenses; (ii) unit mixes; (iii) rent rolls; and (iv) information regarding recent or planned capital expenditures.
In conducting its investigation and analyses, Stanger took into account customary and accepted financial and commercial procedures and considerations as it deemed relevant. Although Stanger reviewed information supplied or otherwise made available by us or our Former Advisor for reasonableness, Stanger assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all such information and of all information supplied or otherwise made available to Stanger by any other party and did not independently verify any such information. Stanger assumed that any operating or financial forecasts and other information and data provided to or otherwise reviewed by or discussed with Stanger were reasonably prepared in good faith on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of our management, the board of directors, and/or our Former Advisor. Stanger relied on our management to advise it promptly if any information previously provided became inaccurate or was required to be updated during the period of their review.
In performing its analyses, Stanger made numerous other assumptions as of various points in time with respect to industry performance, general business, economic, and regulatory conditions, and other matters, many of which are beyond its control and our control. Stanger also made assumptions with respect to certain factual matters. For example, unless specifically informed to the contrary, Stanger assumed that we had clear and marketable title to each real estate property appraised, that no title defects existed, that any improvements were made in accordance with law, that no hazardous materials were present or were present previously, that no significant deed restrictions exist, and that no changes to zoning ordinances or regulations governing use, density, or shape were pending or being considered. Furthermore, Stanger’s analyses, opinions, and conclusions were necessarily based upon market, economic, financial, and other circumstances and conditions existing as of or prior to the date of the Stanger Appraisal Report, and any material change in such circumstances and conditions may affect Stanger’s analyses and conclusions. The Stanger Appraisal Report contains other assumptions, qualifications, and limitations that qualify the analyses, opinions, and conclusions set forth therein. Furthermore, the prices at which our real estate properties may actually be sold could differ from Stanger’s analyses.
Stanger is actively engaged in the business of appraising commercial real estate properties similar to those owned by us in connection with public security offerings, private placements, business combinations, and similar transactions. We do not believe that there are any material conflicts of interest between Stanger, on the one hand, and us, our Former Advisor, and our affiliates, on the other hand. We engaged Stanger, with approval from the Committee, to deliver its Reports to assist in the net asset value calculation and Stanger received compensation for those efforts. In addition, we agreed to indemnify Stanger against certain liabilities arising out of this engagement. A special committee of the board of directors previously engaged Stanger to serve as a financial advisor in connection with our acquisition of Strategic Storage Growth Trust, Inc. and Stanger provided a fairness opinion in connection with that transaction, for which Stanger was paid usual and customary fees. A special committee of the board of directors also engaged Stanger to serve as a financial advisor in connection with the Self Administration Transactions, for which Stanger was paid usual and customary fees. We also engaged Stanger to assist us with raising the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock from an institutional investor. Stanger may from time to time in the future perform other services for us, so long as such other services do not adversely affect the independence of Stanger as certified in the applicable Stanger Appraisal Report.
Although Stanger considered any comments received from us or our Former Advisor relating to their Reports, the final appraised values of our real estate properties were determined by Stanger for the Stanger Appraised Properties. The Reports are addressed solely to the Committee to assist it in calculating and recommending to the Board an Estimated Per Share NAV of our common stock. The Reports are not addressed to the public, may not be relied upon by any other person to establish an Estimated Per Share NAV of our common stock, and do not constitute a recommendation to any person to purchase or sell any shares of our common stock.
38
The foregoing is a summary of the standard assumptions, qualifications, and limitations that generally apply to the Reports. The Reports, including the analysis, opinions, and conclusions set forth in such reports, are qualified by the assumptions, qualifications, and limitations set forth in the respective reports.
Real Estate Valuation
As described above, we engaged Stanger to provide an appraisal of the Stanger Appraised Properties consisting of 112 of the 113 properties in our portfolio as of March 31, 2019. In preparing the Stanger Appraisal Report, Stanger, among other things:
|
• |
performed a site visit of each Stanger Appraised Property in the context of this assignment or prior assignments; |
|
• |
interviewed our officers or our Former Advisor’s personnel to obtain information relating to the physical condition of each Stanger Appraised Property, including known environmental conditions, status of ongoing or planned property additions and reconfigurations, and other factors for such properties; |
|
• |
reviewed historical operating statements, asking rental rates by unit type, achieved rental rates, market rental rates, occupancy for the subject properties and competing properties, current tax information and a review of tax comparable properties, where appropriate, and capitalization rates for self storage properties observed in the marketplace based on investor surveys and general discussions in the market, and extracted from recent sales of self storage properties in each property’s region. |
Stanger employed the income approach to estimate the value of the Stanger Appraised Properties, which involves an economic analysis of the property based on its potential to provide future net annual income. A direct capitalization analysis was used to determine the value of our interest in the portfolio, by valuing the subject interest in each Stanger Appraised Property in the portfolio. The direct capitalization analysis was based upon the stabilized net operating income of each property capitalized at an appropriate capitalization rate for each property based upon property characteristics and competitive position and market conditions at the date of the appraisal. Stanger deducted estimated lease up costs for properties that were not considered stabilized and adjusted the value conclusion of properties that suffered from deferred maintenance. Lastly, Stanger analyzed those properties that are subject to a contingent deferred liability (i.e., an earnout) and reflected such liability, as appropriate.
Stanger prepared the Stanger Appraisal Report, which summarizes key inputs and assumptions, providing a value for each of the Stanger Appraised Properties it appraised using financial information provided by us and our Former Advisor. From such review, Stanger selected the appropriate direct capitalization rate in its direct capitalization analysis. In the Stanger NAV Report, the Borden Park property was included in the net asset value analysis at the pending disposition price, pursuant to a purchase and sale agreement, net of our Former Advisor’s estimated disposition costs.
As of March 31, 2019, we owned 113 real estate assets. The total aggregate purchase price of these properties was approximately $1.2 billion. In addition, through the Valuation Date, we had invested $19.5 million in capital improvements on these real estate assets since inception. As of the Valuation Date, the total value of the Stanger Appraised Properties and the pending disposition price for the Borden Park property at our respective ownership interest was approximately $1.4 billion. This represents an approximately 15.3% increase in the total value of the real estate assets over the aggregate purchase price and aggregate improvements. The following summarizes the key assumptions that were used in the direct capitalization models to arrive at the appraised value of the Stanger Appraised Properties:
Assumption |
|
Range |
|
Weighted Average |
Direct Capitalization rate |
|
4.75% to 6.50% |
|
5.16% |
While we believe that Stanger’s assumptions and inputs are reasonable, a change in these assumptions and inputs would significantly impact the calculation of the appraised value of the Stanger Appraised Properties and thus, the Estimated Per Share NAV. The table below illustrates the impact on the Estimated Per Share NAV if the direct capitalization rates were adjusted by 25 basis points or 5.0%, assuming the value conclusion for each Stanger Appraised Property is based on the method being sensitized and all other factors remain unchanged:
|
|
Estimated Per Share NAV due to: |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Increase 25 Basis Points |
|
Decrease 25 Basis Points |
|
Increase 5.0% |
|
Decrease 5.0% |
|
||||
Direct Capitalization Rate |
|
$ |
9.63 |
|
$ |
11.71 |
|
$ |
9.61 |
|
$ |
11.73 |
|
39
Loans
Values for our consolidated secured notes payable (the “Secured Notes Payable”) were estimated by Stanger using a discounted cash flow analysis, which used inputs based on the remaining loan terms and estimated current market interest rates for notes payable with similar characteristics, including remaining loan term, loan-to-value ratios, debt-service-coverage ratios, prepayment terms, and collateral property attributes. The current market interest rate was generally determined based on market rates for available comparable debt. As of March 31, 2019, the estimated market interest rates ranged from 3.90% to 7.27% for the Secured Notes Payable.
As of March 31, 2019, Stanger’s estimated fair value of our Secured Notes Payable was $779.2 million. The weighted-average discount rate applied to the future estimated debt payments of the Secured Notes Payable was approximately 5.02%.
While we believe that Stanger’s assumptions and inputs are reasonable, a change in these assumptions and inputs would significantly impact the calculation of the estimated value of our Secured Notes Payable and thus, the Estimated Per Share NAV. The table below illustrates the impact on the Estimated Per Share NAV if the market interest rate of the Secured Notes Payable were adjusted by 25 basis points or 5.0%, and assuming all other factors remain unchanged:
Estimated Per Share NAV due to: |
|
||||||||||
Decrease 25 Basis Points |
|
Increase 25 Basis Points |
|
Increase 5.0% |
|
Decrease 5.0% |
|
||||
$ |
10.58 |
|
$ |
10.76 |
|
$ |
10.58 |
|
$ |
10.75 |
|
Cash, Other Assets, Other Liabilities
The fair value of our cash, other assets, and other liabilities were estimated by our Former Advisor to approximate carrying value as of the Valuation Date.
The carrying value of a majority of our other assets and liabilities are considered to equal their fair value due to their short maturities or liquid nature. Certain balances, such as intangible assets and liabilities, estimated liability for distribution and servicing fees and deferred financing costs, have been eliminated for the purpose of the valuation due to the fact that the value of those balances were already considered in the valuation of the respective investments.
Different parties using different assumptions and estimates could derive a different Estimated Per Share NAV, and these differences could be significant. The value of our shares will fluctuate over time in response to developments related to individual assets in our portfolio and the management of those assets and in response to the real estate and finance markets.
Advisor Promote
The Estimated Per Share NAV was calculated net of our Former Advisor’s subordinated participation in net sale proceeds in the event of a liquidation of the portfolio (the “Advisor Promote”), which we advised Stanger was equal to 15.0% of net sale proceeds after stockholders are paid return of capital plus a 6.0% cumulative, non-compounded return. Stanger estimated the value of the Advisor Promote at $5.6 million as of the Valuation Date.
40
The Board’s Determination of the Estimated Per Share NAV
Based upon a review of the Reports provided by Stanger, upon the recommendation of the Committee, the board of directors estimated the Estimated Per Share NAV for each of the Class A common stock and Class T common stock to be $10.66.
Limitations of Estimated Per Share NAV
The various factors considered by the board of directors in determining the Estimated Per Share NAV were based on a number of assumptions and estimates that may not be accurate or complete. As disclosed above, we are providing the Estimated Per Share NAV to assist broker-dealers that participate, or participated, in our public offering in meeting their customer account statement reporting obligations. As with any valuation methodology, the methodologies used are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that may not be accurate or complete. Different parties with different assumptions and estimates could derive a different Estimated Per Share NAV. The Estimated Per Share NAV is not audited and does not represent the fair value of our assets or liabilities according to GAAP.
Accordingly, with respect to the Estimated Per Share NAV, we can give no assurance that:
|
• |
a stockholder would be able to resell his or her Class A shares of common stock or Class T shares of common stock at the Estimated Per Share NAV; |
|
• |
a stockholder would ultimately realize distributions per share equal to our Estimated Per Share NAV upon liquidation of our assets and settlement of its liabilities or a sale of our company; |
|
• |
our shares of Class A common stock and Class T common stock would trade at the Estimated Per Share NAV on a national securities exchange; |
|
• |
a different independent third-party appraiser or other third-party valuation firm would agree with our Estimated Per Share NAV; or |
|
• |
the Estimated Per Share NAV, or the methodology used to estimate our Estimated Per Share NAV, will be found by any regulatory authority to comply with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or other regulatory requirements. |
Similarly, the amount a stockholder may receive upon repurchase of their shares, if they participate in our share repurchase program, may be greater than or less than the amount a stockholder paid for the shares, regardless of any increase in the underlying value of any assets owned by us.
The Estimated Per Share NAV is based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities divided by the number of shares outstanding on an adjusted fully diluted basis, calculated as of March 31, 2019. The Estimated Per Share NAV was based upon 58,617,815 shares of equity interest outstanding as of March 31, 2019, which was comprised of (i) 50,619,451 outstanding Class A shares of our common stock, plus (ii) 7,562,103 outstanding Class T shares of our common stock, plus (iii) 416,073 outstanding OP Units, which OP Units are exchangeable on a one-for-one basis into Class A shares of our common stock, plus (iv) 20,188 shares of unvested restricted Class A common stock issued to our independent directors.
Further, the value of our shares will fluctuate over time as a result of, among other things, developments related to individual assets and responses to the real estate and capital markets. The Estimated Per Share NAV does not reflect a discount for the fact that we were, at the time of the calculation, externally managed, nor does it reflect a real estate portfolio premium or discount versus the sum of the individual property values. The Estimated Per Share NAV also does not take into account estimated disposition costs and fees for real estate properties that are not held for sale. We currently anticipate publishing a new estimated share value on an annual basis
Distribution Reinvestment Plan
In accordance with our DRP Offering, the price per share pursuant to the DRP Offering is equal to the estimated value per share approved by the Board and in effect on the date of purchase of shares under the DRP Offering. In connection with the estimated value per share described herein, the Board approved a share price for the purchase of shares under the DRP Offering equal to the estimated value per share of $10.66 for both Class A shares and Class T shares, effective for distribution payments paid beginning in July 2019.
41
Distributions
We elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2014. By qualifying as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that we distribute to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will then be subject to federal income taxes on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost unless the IRS grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect our net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, we believe that we are organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT and intend to operate in the foreseeable future in such a manner that we will remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.
For income tax purposes, distributions to common stockholders are characterized as ordinary dividends, capital gain dividends, or as nontaxable distributions. To the extent that we make a distribution in excess of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, the distribution will be a non-taxable return of capital, reducing the tax basis in each U.S. stockholder’s shares, and the amount of each distribution in excess of a U.S. stockholder’s tax basis in its shares will be taxable as gain realized from the sale of its shares. For 2014 and 2015, all of our distributions constituted non-taxable returns of capital, which were paid from offering proceeds. For 2016, we paid a total of approximately $22.2 million in distributions, of which approximately $21.2 million constituted a non-taxable return of capital. For 2017, we paid a total of approximately $32.9 million in distributions, of which approximately $27.9 million constituted a non-taxable return of capital. For 2018, we paid a total of approximately $33.6 million in distributions, of which approximately $31.4 million constituted a non-taxable return of capital. For 2019, we paid a total of approximately $34.3 million in distributions, of which approximately $34.3 million constituted a non-taxable return of capital.
The following table shows the distributions we have paid in cash and through our distribution reinvestment plan for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2019:
Quarter |
|
OP Unit Holders(1) |
|
|
Preferred Stockholders(2) |
|
|
Common Stockholders(1) |
|
|
Distributions Declared per Common Share |
|
||||
1st Quarter 2018 |
|
$ |
74,446 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
8,220,826 |
|
|
$ |
0.150 |
|
2nd Quarter 2018 |
|
$ |
76,100 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
8,450,154 |
|
|
$ |
0.150 |
|
3rd Quarter 2018 |
|
$ |
76,100 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
8,487,303 |
|
|
$ |
0.150 |
|
4th Quarter 2018 |
|
$ |
26,834 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
8,465,629 |
|
|
$ |
0.150 |
|
1st Quarter 2019 |
|
$ |
26,407 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
8,399,351 |
|
|
$ |
0.150 |
|
2nd Quarter 2019 |
|
$ |
62,925 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
8,618,291 |
|
|
$ |
0.150 |
|
3rd Quarter 2019 |
|
$ |
990,364 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
8,649,607 |
|
|
$ |
0.150 |
|
4th Quarter 2019 |
|
$ |
1,360,551 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
8,586,703 |
|
|
$ |
0.150 |
|
(1) |
Declared distributions are paid monthly in arrears. |
(2) |
Declared distributions are paid quarterly in arrears. See Note 7, Preferred Equity, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report, for additional information. |
The payment of distributions from sources other than cash flows from operations may reduce the amount of proceeds available for investment and operations or cause us to incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds or additional preferred dividends as a result of additional issuances of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock.
Over the long-term, we expect that a greater percentage of our distributions will be paid from cash flows from operations. However, our operating performance cannot be accurately predicted and may deteriorate in the future due to numerous factors, including our ability to invest capital at favorable yields, the financial performance of our investments in the current real estate and financial environment and the types and mix of investments in our portfolio. As a result, future distributions declared and paid may exceed cash flow from operations.
42
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table provides details of our Employee and Director Long-Term Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2019, under which shares of our Class A common stock are authorized for issuance.
Plan Category |
|
Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights |
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights |
|
|
Number of Securities Remaining for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans(1) |
|
|||
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5,630,071 |
|
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5,630,071 |
|
(1) |
The total number of shares of our Class A common stock reserved for issuance under the Plan is equal to 10% of our outstanding shares of Class A and Class T common stock at any time, but not to exceed 10,000,000 shares in the aggregate. As of December 31, 2019, we had 59,135,017 outstanding shares of common stock. |
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
On October 3, 2019, we issued 2,931.52 shares of restricted stock to Joseph H. Robinson in connection with his appointment as our Chief Operations Officer. Since this transaction was not considered to have involved a “public offering” within the meaning of Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, the shares issued were exempt from registration.
On October 29, 2019, we issued 150,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock to the Investor, as defined and described elsewhere in this report. Since this transaction was not considered to have involved a “public offering” within the meaning of Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, the shares issued were exempt from registration. We relied on this exemption from registration based in part on representations made by the Investor. See Note 7, Preferred Equity, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report for additional information.
Redemption Program
Our share redemption program enables our stockholders to have their shares redeemed by us, subject to the significant conditions and limitations described in our prospectus. As of December 31, 2019, approximately $43.4 million of common stock was available for redemption and approximately $0.4 million was included in accrued expenses and other liabilities as of December 31, 2019. During the three months ended December 31, 2019, we redeemed shares as follows:
For the Month Ended |
|
Total Number of Shares Redeemed |
|
|
Average Price Paid per Share |
|
|
Total Number of Shares Redeemed as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
|
|
Maximum Number of Shares (or Units) That May Yet to be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
|
||||
October 31, 2019 |
|
|
39,222 |
|
|
$ |
10.45 |
|
|
|
39,222 |
|
|
|
2,425,180 |
|
November 30, 2019 |
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,425,180 |
|
December 31, 2019 |
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,425,180 |
|
On August 26, 2019, our board of directors approved the suspension of our share redemption program effective as of September 27, 2019, except with respect to redemption requests made in connection with the death or disability of a stockholder, redemption due to confinement to a long-term care facility, or other exigent circumstances. See Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report for additional information.
43
ITEM 6. |
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
The following selected financial and operating information should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and the financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K:
|
|
As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
|
|
As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
|
|
As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
|
|
As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2016 |
|
|
As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2015 |
|
|||||
Operating Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
109,528,549 |
|
|
$ |
80,412,257 |
|
|
$ |
76,108,906 |
|
|
$ |
45,431,146 |
|
|
$ |
17,905,699 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
11,588,012 |
|
|
|
16,151,443 |
|
|
|
3,575,111 |
|
|
|
(14,910,503 |
) |
|
|
(5,076,880 |
) |
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
|
|
(24,750,333 |
) |
|
|
(3,698,377 |
) |
|
|
(14,864,065 |
) |
|
|
(26,090,385 |
) |
|
|
(15,290,941 |
) |
Net loss per Class A Share- basic and diluted |
|
|
(0.42 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
(0.65 |
) |
|
|
(2.56 |
) |
Net loss per Class T Share- basic and diluted |
|
|
(0.42 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
(0.65 |
) |
|
|
(2.56 |
) |
Dividends declared per common share |
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
|
0.60 |
|
Balance Sheet Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate facilities |
|
$ |
1,173,825,368 |
|
|
$ |
820,296,026 |
|
|
$ |
829,679,477 |
|
|
$ |
727,455,733 |
|
|
$ |
156,244,550 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,311,433,731 |
|
|
|
796,354,037 |
|
|
|
817,497,838 |
|
|
|
752,553,611 |
|
|
|
193,446,828 |
|
Total debt |
|
|
712,733,002 |
|
|
|
406,084,103 |
|
|
|
396,792,902 |
|
|
|
320,820,740 |
|
|
|
23,029,775 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
775,802,382 |
|
|
|
418,870,325 |
|
|
|
410,062,755 |
|
|
|
331,209,006 |
|
|
|
26,371,397 |
|
Redeemable common stock |
|
|
43,391,362 |
|
|
|
32,226,815 |
|
|
|
24,497,059 |
|
|
|
10,711,682 |
|
|
|
1,223,483 |
|
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock |
|
|
146,426,164 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total equity |
|
|
345,813,823 |
|
|
|
345,256,897 |
|
|
|
382,938,024 |
|
|
|
410,632,923 |
|
|
|
165,851,948 |
|
Other Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
9,767,022 |
|
|
$ |
18,359,125 |
|
|
$ |
18,359,125 |
|
|
$ |
19,935,013 |
|
|
$ |
(1,252,240 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(347,783,873 |
) |
|
|
(3,179,291 |
) |
|
|
(3,179,291 |
) |
|
|
(57,546,328 |
) |
|
|
(140,865,350 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
392,223,412 |
|
|
|
(12,541,473 |
) |
|
|
(12,541,473 |
) |
|
|
31,278,664 |
|
|
|
163,690,908 |
|
44
ITEM 7. |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the “Selected Financial Data” above and our accompanying consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto. See also “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” preceding Part I.
Overview
SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc. (f/k/a Strategic Storage Trust II, Inc.), a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), is a self-managed and fully-integrated self storage real estate investment trust (“REIT”), formed on January 8, 2013 under the Maryland General Corporation Law. Our year-end is December 31. As used in this report, “we,” “us,” “our,” and “Company” refer to SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc. and each of our subsidiaries.
On June 28, 2019, we and our operating partnership, SmartStop OP, L.P. (f/k/a Strategic Storage Operating Partnership II, L.P.) (our “Operating Partnership”), and SmartStop TRS, Inc. (f/k/a Strategic Storage TRS II, Inc.) (the “TRS”) entered into a series of transactions, agreements, and amendments to our existing agreements and arrangements (such agreements and amendments hereinafter referred to collectively as the “Self Administration Transaction”), with SmartStop Asset Management LLC, our former sponsor (“SAM”) and SmartStop OP Holdings, LLC (“SS OP Holdings”), a subsidiary of SAM, pursuant to which, effective June 28, 2019, we acquired the self storage advisory, asset management and property management businesses and certain joint venture interests of SAM (the “Self Storage Platform”), along with certain other assets of SAM. As a result of the Self Administration Transaction, SAM is no longer our sponsor, and the special limited partnership interest and limited partnership interest it held in our Operating Partnership through our Former External Advisor have been redeemed. Additionally, we are now self-managed and succeed to the advisory, asset management and property management businesses and certain joint ventures previously in place for us, Strategic Storage Trust IV, Inc. (“SST IV”), a public non-traded REIT, and Strategic Storage Growth Trust II, Inc. (“SSGT II”) (collectively with SST IV the “Managed REITs”), a private non-traded REIT, and now as a sponsor to the Managed REITs have the internal capability to originate, structure and manage additional investment products (the “Managed REIT Platform”) which would be sponsored by SmartStop REIT Advisors, LLC (“SRA”), our indirect subsidiary. As a result of the Self Administration Transaction, we indirectly own 100% of the membership interests in Strategic Storage Advisor II, LLC (our “Former External Advisor”) and each of Strategic Storage Property Management II, LLC and SS Growth Property Management, LLC (together, our “Former External Property Managers”). See Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report for additional information.
On October 1, 2018, we, our Operating Partnership, and SST II Growth Acquisition, LLC, our wholly-owned subsidiary (“Merger Sub”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “SSGT Merger Agreement”) with Strategic Storage Growth Trust, Inc. (“SSGT”), a non-traded REIT sponsored by our former sponsor, and SS Growth Operating Partnership, L.P. (“SSGT OP”). Pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, on January 24, 2019: (i) we acquired SSGT by way of a merger of SSGT with and into Merger Sub, with Merger Sub being the surviving entity (the “SSGT REIT Merger”); and (ii) immediately after the SSGT REIT Merger, SSGT OP merged with and into our Operating Partnership, with the Operating Partnership continuing as the surviving entity and remaining a subsidiary of the Company (the “SSGT Partnership Merger” and, together with the SSGT REIT Merger, the “SSGT Mergers”). SSGT was focused on opportunistic self storage properties, including development, and lease-up properties. See Note 3, Real Estate Facilities—Merger with Strategic Storage Growth Trust, Inc., for additional information related to the SSGT Mergers.
In our initial public offering, which commenced on January 10, 2014 and ended on January 9, 2017, we offered a maximum of $1.0 billion in common shares for sale to the public (the “Primary Offering”) and $95.0 million in common shares for sale pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan (collectively, the “Offering”) and sold approximately 48.4 million Class A Shares and approximately 7.3 million Class T Shares for approximately $493 million and $73 million, respectively.
45
As of December 31, 2019, we owned 112 self storage properties located in 17 states (Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, Texas and Washington) and Ontario, Canada (the Greater Toronto Area) comprising of approximately 72,000 units and approximately 8.2 million rentable square feet.
Critical Accounting Policies
We have established accounting policies which conform to generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. Following is a discussion of the estimates and assumptions used in setting accounting policies that we consider critical in the presentation of our financial statements. Many estimates and assumptions involved in the application of GAAP may have a material impact on our financial condition or operating performance, or on the comparability of such information to amounts reported for other periods, because of the subjectivity and judgment required to account for highly uncertain items or the susceptibility of such items to change. These estimates and assumptions affect our reported amounts of assets and liabilities, our disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and our reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period covered by this report. If management’s judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied or different amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses would have been recorded, thus resulting in a materially different presentation of the financial statements or materially different amounts being reported in the financial statements. Additionally, other companies may use different estimates and assumptions that may impact the comparability of our financial condition and results of operations to
those companies.
We believe that our critical accounting policies include the following: real estate purchase price allocations; the evaluation of whether any of our long-lived assets have been impaired; the valuation of goodwill and related impairment considerations, the valuation of our trademarks and related impairment considerations, the determination of the useful lives of our long-lived assets; and the evaluation of the consolidation of our interests in joint ventures. The following discussion of these policies supplements, but does not supplant the description of our significant accounting policies, as contained in Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report, and is intended to present our analysis of the uncertainties involved in arriving upon and applying each policy.
Real Estate Purchase Price Allocation
We account for acquisitions in accordance with GAAP which requires that we allocate the purchase price of a property to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values. This guidance requires us to make significant estimates and assumptions, including fair value estimates, which requires the use of significant unobservable inputs as of the acquisition date.
The value of the tangible assets, consisting of land and buildings is determined as if vacant. Because we believe that substantially all of the leases in place at properties we will acquire will be at market rates, as the majority of the leases are month-to-month contracts, we do not expect to allocate any portion of the purchase prices to above or below market leases. We also consider whether in-place, market leases represent an intangible asset. Acquisitions of portfolios of facilities are allocated to the individual facilities based upon an income approach or a cash flow analysis using appropriate risk adjusted capitalization rates which take into account the relative size, age, and location of the individual facility along with current and projected occupancy and rental rate levels or appraised values, if available.
Our allocations of purchase prices are based on certain significant estimates and assumptions, variations in such estimates and assumptions could result in a materially different presentation of the consolidated financial statements or materially different amounts being reported in the consolidated financial statements.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The majority of our assets consist of long-lived real estate assets as well as intangible assets related to our acquisitions. We evaluate such assets for impairment based on events and changes in circumstances that may arise in the future and that may impact the carrying amounts of our long-lived assets. When indicators of potential impairment are present, we will assess the recoverability of the particular asset by determining whether the carrying value of the asset will be recovered, through an evaluation of the undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. This evaluation is based on a number of estimates and assumptions. Based on this evaluation, if the expected undiscounted future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, we will adjust the value of the long-lived asset and recognize an impairment loss. Our evaluation of the impairment of long-lived assets could result in a materially different presentation of the financial statements or materially different amounts being reported in the financial statements, as the amount of impairment loss, if any, recognized may vary based on the estimates and assumptions we use.
46
Goodwill Valuation
Goodwill is recorded as the difference, if any, between the aggregate consideration paid for an acquisition and the fair value of the net tangible assets and other intangible assets acquired. Goodwill is allocated to various reporting units, as applicable and is not amortized. We perform an annual impairment test for goodwill and between annual tests, we evaluate the recoverability of goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill may not be fully recoverable. In our impairment test of goodwill, we perform a quantitative analysis to compare the fair value of each reporting unit to its respective carrying amount. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge will be recognized
Trademarks Valuation
Trademarks are based on the value of our brands. Trademarks are valued using the relief from royalty method, which presumes that without ownership of such trademarks, we would have to make a stream of payments to a brand or franchise owner in return for the right to use their name. By virtue of this asset, we avoid any such payments and record the related intangible value of our ownership of the brand name. We used the following significant projections and assumptions to determine value under the relief from royalty method: revenues; royalty rate; tax expense; terminal growth rate; and discount rate. For the SmartStop® trademark, the projections underlying this relief from royalty model were forecasted for eight years and then a terminal value calculation was applied. For the Strategic Storage® trademark, the projections underlying the relief from royalty model were forecasted for seven years. Applying the selected pretax royalty rates to the applicable revenue base in each period yielded pretax income for each of our trademarks. These pretax totals were tax effected utilizing the applicable tax rate to arrive at net, after-tax cash flows. The net, after-tax flows were then discounted to present value utilizing an appropriate discount rate. The present value of the after-tax cash flows were then added to the present value of the amortization tax benefit (considering the 15-year amortization of intangible assets pursuant to U.S. tax legislation) to arrive at the estimated fair values for the trademarks.
We will evaluate whether any triggering events or changes in circumstances have occurred subsequent to our annual impairment test that would indicate an impairment condition may exist. If any change in circumstance or triggering event occurs, and results in a significant impact to our revenue and profitability projections, or any significant assumption in our valuations methods is adversely impacted, the impact could result in a material impairment charge in the future.
Estimated Useful Lives of Long-Lived Assets
We assess the useful lives of the assets underlying our properties based upon a subjective determination of the period of future benefit for each asset. We record depreciation expense with respect to these assets based upon the estimated useful lives we determine. Our determinations of the useful lives of the assets could result in a materially different presentation of the financial statements or materially different amounts being reported in the financial statements, as such determinations, and the corresponding amount of depreciation expense, may vary dramatically based on the estimates and assumptions we use.
Consolidation of Investments in Joint Ventures
We evaluate the consolidation of our investments in joint ventures in accordance with relevant accounting guidance. This evaluation requires us to determine whether we have a controlling interest in a joint venture through a means other than voting rights, and, if so, such joint venture may be required to be consolidated in our financial statements. Our evaluation of our joint ventures under such accounting guidance could result in a materially different presentation of the financial statements or materially different amounts being reported in the financial statements, as the joint venture entities included in our financial statements may vary based on the estimates and assumptions we use.
REIT Qualification
We made an election under Section 856(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code) to be taxed as a REIT under the Code, commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2014. By qualifying as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on income that we distribute to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year in which our qualification is denied. Such an event could materially and adversely affect our net income and could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. However, we believe that we are organized and operate in a manner that will enable us to continue to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, and we intend to continue to operate as to remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.
47
Recent Market Conditions
In December 2019, COVID-19 emerged in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. While initially the outbreak was largely concentrated in China and caused significant disruptions to its economy, it has now spread to many other countries and infections have been reported globally, including in the United States and in the markets in which we operate. Our rental revenue and operating results depend significantly on the demand for self storage space. While we have not seen a significant impact on the demand for self storage space resulting from the COVID-19 outbreak as of the date of this report, if the outbreak causes weakness in national, regional and local economies that negatively impact the demand for self storage space and/or increase bad debts, our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and prospects could be adversely impacted. Additionally, we typically conduct aspects of our leasing activity at our facilities, as well as the offering of various ancillary products, including moving and packing supplies, such as locks and boxes, and other services, such as tenant insurance or similar programs. Accordingly, reductions in the ability and willingness of customers to visit our facilities due to the COVID-19 outbreak could reduce rental revenue and ancillary operating revenue produced by our facilities. Concerns relating to such an outbreak could also prevent our on-site personnel from reporting for work at our facilities, which could adversely affect our ability to adequately manage our facilities. In order to prevent the spread of COVID-19 there have been, and may continue to be temporary shut downs or restrictions placed on businesses by cities, counties, states, or the federal government. These orders have impacted, and may continue to impact, our facilities and operations. The ultimate extent of the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and prospects will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information that may emerge concerning the breadth or severity of the COVID-19 outbreak and the actions to contain or treat its impact, among others.
Results of Operations
Overview
We derive revenues principally from: (i) rents received from our self storage tenant leases; (ii) fees generated from our Managed REITs; (iii) our Tenant Programs; and (iv) sales of packing- and storage-related supplies at our storage facilities. Therefore, our operating results depend significantly on our ability to retain our existing tenants and lease our available self storage units to new tenants, while maintaining and, where possible, increasing the prices for our self storage units. Additionally, our operating results depend on our tenants making their required rental payments to us, maintaining and increasing fees from our Managed REITs, and the success of our Tenant Programs.
Competition in the market areas in which we operate is significant and affects the occupancy levels, rental rates, rental revenues and operating expenses of our facilities. Development of any new self storage facilities would intensify competition of self storage operators in markets in which we operate.
As of December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, we owned 111, 83, and 83 operating self storage facilities, respectively. Our operating results for the year ended December 31, 2017 include full year periods for 77 self storage facilities plus partial year periods for the six self storage facilities we acquired in the first quarter of 2017. Our operating results for the year ended December 31, 2018 included full year periods for the 83 self storage facilities owned as of December 31, 2017. Our operating results for the year ended December 31, 2019 included full year periods for the 83 self storage facilities owned as of December 31, 2018, plus partial year periods for the 29 operating self storage facilities we acquired in 2019, one of which was sold in October 2019. Operating results in future periods will depend on the results of operations of these properties and of the real estate properties that we acquire in the future.
During the year ended December 31, 2019 our operations were substantially impacted by the SSGT Mergers and the Self Administration Transaction along with the additional debt incurred to finance such transactions. Below is a summary of the impact of each of those transactions.
SSGT Mergers
On January 24, 2019, we merged with SSGT, a REIT focused on opportunistic self storage properties, including development and lease-up properties. Through the SSGT Mergers, we acquired 27 operating self storage facilities which had a physical occupancy of approximately 77% at acquisition, along with one property that was subsequently sold in October 2019 located in San Antonio, Texas, one development property in the Greater Toronto, Canada area and the rights to acquire another property under development in Gilbert, Arizona, which was acquired in July 2019. While the SSGT portfolio generated positive net operating income during 2019, the portfolio was not yet physically or economically stabilized and is expected to continue to grow in various key metrics. The chart below illustrates the growth in occupancy and total revenues in the SSGT portfolio of assets since the completion of the SSGT Mergers:
48
(1) |
Physical occupancy represents the percentage of square feet occupied for 27 SSGT operating properties through June 30, 2019, and 28 properties thereafter including the newly acquired Gilbert property. Properties that were under development or had not yet been acquired were excluded from each respective period. Additionally, the San Antonio II property, which was sold in October 2019, has been excluded from all periods. |
(2) |
Total revenue represents the total self storage revenues earned during each respective quarter for 27 SSGT operating properties through June 30, 2019 and all 28 SSGT operating properties thereafter. Properties that were under development or had not yet been acquired were excluded from each respective period. Additionally, the San Antonio II property, which was sold in October 2019, has been excluded from all periods. |
(3) |
Physical occupancy declined from June 30, 2019 to September 30, 2019 due to the inclusion of the Gilbert property, which was acquired in July 2019 at 0% occupancy. The equivalent September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2019 occupancies for the 27 properties presented as of June 30, 2019 were approximately 84% and 85%, respectively. |
Over the next 24 to 36 months, we believe the SSGT portfolio will continue to grow revenues and net operating income, and will become accretive to FFO, as adjusted, and cash flow over that time. While FFO, as adjusted, for the current year was diluted as a result of the SSGT Mergers and associated increase in debt and interest expense, the continued progress in metrics such as physical occupancy and total revenue, coupled with the acquisition of the Gilbert property and the completion of the Toronto development property, we believe will result in accretive cash flows and FFO, as adjusted, in the future. While we expect physical occupancy to continue to improve as the SSGT properties continue to approach stabilization, the acquisition of the Gilbert property has caused a short term decline in portfolio physical occupancy as of December 31, 2019, and we expect a similar effect on physical occupancy upon the opening and inclusion of the Toronto development in that metric. However, total revenue for the SSGT portfolio has continued to increase, as the other properties continue to increase physical occupancy and achieve higher rental rates.
Self Administration Transaction
On June 28, 2019, we completed the Self Administration Transaction, in which we became self-managed and succeed to the advisory, asset management and property management businesses and certain joint ventures previously in place for us, SST IV and SSGT II. Additionally, we now have the internal capability to originate, structure and manage additional investment products which would be sponsored by SRA. The Self Administration Transaction and the other transactions discussed herein were approved by our board of directors at the recommendation of a special committee of our board of directors comprised solely of independent directors. As a result of the Self Administration Transaction, we now own all the intellectual property associated with the “SmartStop® Self Storage” brand name, including the trademarks, domain names, websites, internal processes and procedures utilized across the United States and Canada. We also acquired a dedicated workforce of over 350 self storage professionals who were previously employees of SAM. With the Self Administration Transaction we became a self-managed and fully-integrated self storage company.
49
Our 2019 operating results have been, and we expect our operating results in future periods will continue to be, significantly impacted by the Self Administration Transaction. As a result of the Self Administration Transaction, effective June 28, 2019, we no longer incur acquisition, asset and property management fees, which we previously incurred while we were externally advised. Additionally, we now receive 100% of economics related to the Tenant Programs. However, we now incur additional compensation expense and related overhead costs. Additionally, we now are the sponsor of the Managed REITs, generating revenue and incurring expenses associated with such activities.
As the assets under management of the Managed REITs increase, we expect to see an increase in property management and asset management fees, as well as incremental revenues from our Tenant Program joint ventures. At the time of the Self Administration Transaction, the total assets under management of the Managed REITs was approximately $220 million. As of December 31, 2019, the Managed REITs had total assets under management of approximately $350 million, an increase of approximately $135 million since the close of the Self Administration Transaction. See Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report for additional information.
Below we have summarized the estimated impact, before noncontrolling interests, depreciation, amortization and interest expense related to the Self Administration Transaction to our consolidated financial statements (in millions):
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
Description |
2019 |
|
|
Elimination of property management and asset management fees |
$ |
7.2 |
|
Incremental Tenant Program revenues |
|
1.0 |
|
Incremental compensation and other expenses |
|
(4.6 |
) |
Other |
|
0.3 |
|
Total |
$ |
3.9 |
|
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Total Self Storage Revenues
Total self storage related revenues for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were approximately $103.2 million and $80.4 million, respectively. The increase in total self storage revenues of approximately $22.8 million, or 28.3%, is primarily attributable to the 28 operating self storage facilities acquired in January 2019 and one operating property acquired in July 2019 in connection with the SSGT Mergers (approximately $22.0 million), incremental Tenant Program revenues generated on our wholly owned assets primarily as a result of the Self Administration Transaction (approximately $1.5 million), and same-store increases, excluding the impact of the incremental Tenant Program revenues, of approximately $1.1 million, or 1.6% (see same-store facility results table and related footnotes for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 for further discussion), partially offset by the impact of adopting ASU 2016-02, which reduced total self storage revenues by approximately $1.7 million as amounts previously recorded to bad debt expense within property operating expenses are now presented as a reduction to self storage rental revenue. We expect total self storage revenues to increase in future periods as the SSGT properties become economically and physically stabilized.
Managed REIT Platform Revenue
Managed REIT Platform revenue for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was approximately $3.1 million and none, respectively. Such revenue consisted of approximately $1.5 million of asset management fee revenue, approximately $0.7 million of property management fee revenue and approximately $0.9 million of other revenue earned pursuant to our management contracts with the Managed REITs. This revenue was derived from the Managed REIT Platform business, effective June 28, 2019, as a result of the Self Administration Transaction. We expect our Managed REIT Platform revenue will grow in future periods as we own the platform for the full fiscal period and as our Managed REITs acquire additional properties.
50
Reimbursable Costs from Managed REITs
Reimbursable costs from Managed REITs for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were approximately $3.3 million and none, respectively. Such revenues consist of costs incurred by us as we provide property management and advisory services to the Managed REITs, which are reimbursed by our Managed REITs, pursuant to our related contracts with the Managed REITs. We expect reimbursable costs from Managed REITs to increase in future periods as we own the platform for the full fiscal period and as our Managed REITs acquire additional properties.
Property Operating Expenses
Property operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were approximately $35.7 million (or 34.6% of self storage revenue) and $25.2 million (or 31.4% of self storage revenue), respectively. Property operating expenses includes the costs to operate our facilities including payroll expense, utilities, insurance, real estate taxes, and marketing. The increase in property operating expenses of approximately $10.5 million, is primarily attributable to the 28 operating self storage facilities acquired in January 2019 and one operating property acquired in July 2019 in connection with the SSGT Mergers (approximately $9.4 million), an increase of approximately $0.5 million related to increased compensation expense as a result of the Self Administration Transaction, and an increase in same-store operating expenses of approximately $1.6 million, primarily attributable to repairs and maintenance, and property taxes, partially offset by the impact of adopting ASU 2016-02, which reduced 2019 same store property operating expenses by approximately $1.2 million. We expect property operating expenses to decrease as a percentage of revenue as overall occupancy grows and therefore revenues increases, particularly in the SSGT properties.
Property Operating Expenses – Affiliates
Property operating expenses – affiliates for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were approximately $6.6 million and $10.3 million, respectively. Property operating expenses – affiliates includes property management fees and asset management fees. The decrease in property operating expenses – affiliates of approximately $3.6 million is primarily attributable to the Self Administration Transaction, offset by costs related to the 28 operating self storage facilities acquired in January 2019 in connection with the SSGT Mergers. As a result of the Self Administration Transaction, we no longer incur such expenses.
Managed REIT Platform Expenses
Managed REIT Platform expenses for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were approximately $2.7 million and none, respectively. Such expenses primarily consisted of expenses related to the Administrative Services Agreement (as defined in Note 4, Self Administration Transaction, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report), and other non-reimbursable costs associated with the operation of the Managed REIT Platform we acquired on June 28, 2019. We expect Managed REIT Platform expenses to increase in future periods as we own the platform for the full fiscal period and, to a lesser extent, as our Managed REITs acquire additional properties.
Reimbursable Costs from Managed REITs
Reimbursable costs from Managed REITs for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were approximately $3.3 million and none, respectively. Such expenses consist of costs incurred by us as we provide property management and advisory services to the Managed REITs, which are reimbursed by our Managed REITs, pursuant to our related contracts with the Managed REITs. We expect reimbursable costs from Managed REITs to increase in future periods as we own the platform for the full fiscal period and as our Managed REITs acquire additional properties.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were approximately $10.5 million and $4.8 million, respectively. Such expenses have historically consisted primarily of legal expenses, accounting expenses, transfer agent fees, directors and officers’ insurance expense, an allocation of our Former External Advisor’s payroll related costs (through June 27, 2019) and board of directors related costs. Additionally, since June 28, 2019, as a result of the Self Administration Transaction, we recorded an incremental increase of approximately $4.6 million of payroll and overhead related costs now that we are self-managed. The 2018 general and administrative expenses were indicative of an externally-advised structure for the entire year, whereas effective June 28, 2019, we became self-managed and employ our own workforce. We expect general and administrative expenses to decrease as a percentage of total revenues over time.
51
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses
Depreciation and amortization expenses for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were approximately $41.1 million and $22.8 million, respectively. Depreciation expense consists primarily of depreciation on the buildings and site improvements at our properties. Amortization expense consists of the amortization of our in place lease intangible assets resulting from our self storage acquisitions and amortization of certain intangible assets acquired in the Self Administration Transaction. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense is primarily attributable to the 28 operating self storage facilities acquired in January 2019 and one operating property acquired in July 2019 in connection with the SSGT Mergers, as well as the intangible assets and depreciation on our corporate office, acquired in the Self Administration Transaction.
Self Administration Transaction Expenses
Self administration transaction expenses for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were approximately $1.6 million and none, respectively. Self administration transaction expenses consist primarily of legal fees, and fees and expenses of our professional and financial advisors.
Acquisition Expenses – Affiliates
Acquisition expenses – affiliates for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were approximately $84,000 and $72,000, respectively. Acquisition expenses – affiliates primarily relates to acquisition costs that were reimbursable to an affiliate and incurred in the pursuit of self storage properties which may be acquired in future periods, but did not meet our capitalization criteria. As a result of the Self Administration Transaction, we no longer incur such expenses.
Other Property Acquisition Expenses
Other property acquisition expenses for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were approximately $0.1 million and $1.1 million, respectively. These acquisition expenses were incurred prior to such acquisitions becoming probable in accordance with our capitalization policy.
Interest Expense and Accretion of Fair Market Value of Secured Debt
Interest expense and the accretion of fair market value of secured debt for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were approximately $37.4 million and $17.6 million, respectively. The increase of approximately $19.8 million is primarily attributable to the additional debt obtained in connection with the SSGT Mergers during the first quarter of 2019, and to a lesser extent, the additional debt obtained in connection with the Self Administration Transaction. We expect interest expense to fluctuate in future periods commensurate with our future debt levels and interest rates.
Interest Expense – Debt Issuance Costs
Interest expense – debt issuance costs for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were approximately $4.0 million and $1.6 million, respectively. The increase in interest expense – debt issuance costs of $2.4 million is primarily attributable to costs related to the new debt obtained in connection with the SSGT Mergers. We expect interest expense - debt issuance costs to fluctuate commensurate with our future financing activity.
Net Loss on Extinguishment of Debt
Net loss on extinguishment of debt for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was approximately $2.6 million and none, respectively. The increase in net loss on debt extinguishment is primarily attributable to prepayment penalties related to the early pay off of the Raleigh/Myrtle Beach promissory note, and the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs on loans that were paid off in connection with the SSGT Mergers and the loans that were paid off in connection with the issuance of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock.
Gain Resulting from Acquisition of Unconsolidated Affiliates
Gain resulting from acquisition of unconsolidated affiliates for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was approximately $8.0 million and none, respectively. The gain was related to our remeasurement to fair value of the Tenant Programs joint ventures upon our acquisition of 100% of such entities in the Self Administration Transaction.
52
Gain on Sale of Real Estate
Gain on sale of real estate for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was approximately $3.9 million and none, respectively. The gain was related to the October 18, 2019 sale of a self storage facility we owned in San Antonio, Texas (the “San Antonio II Property”).
Other
Other for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 represented net expenses of approximately $0.6 million and $0.7 million, respectively. Other consists primarily of state and federal tax expense, accretion of deferred tax liabilities, foreign currency fluctuations, and changes in value related to our foreign currency and interest rate hedges not designated for hedge accounting.
Same-Store Facility Results – Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
The following table sets forth operating data for our same-store facilities (those properties included in the consolidated results of operations since January 1, 2018, excluding the Centennial property, which was a lease-up facility during 2018) for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. We consider the following data to be meaningful as this allows for the comparison of results without the effects of acquisition, lease up, or development activity.
|
|
Same-Store Facilities |
|
|
Non Same-Store Facilities |
|
Total |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
% Change |
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
% Change |
|
||||||||
Revenue (3) |
|
$ |
80,363,783 |
|
|
$ |
79,723,033 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
(1)(2) |
$ |
22,837,477 |
|
|
$ |
689,224 |
|
|
N/M |
|
$ |
103,201,260 |
|
|
$ |
80,412,257 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
% |
Property operating expenses (4) |
|
|
28,041,358 |
|
|
|
29,562,112 |
|
|
|
(5.1 |
)% |
(1)(2) |
|
10,664,864 |
|
|
|
475,698 |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
38,706,222 |
|
|
|
30,037,810 |
|
|
|
28.9 |
% |
Property operating income |
|
$ |
52,322,425 |
|
|
$ |
50,160,921 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
(2) |
$ |
12,172,613 |
|
|
$ |
213,526 |
|
|
N/M |
|
$ |
64,495,038 |
|
|
$ |
50,374,447 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
% |
Number of facilities |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rentable square feet (5) |
|
|
5,963,100 |
|
|
|
5,963,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,261,200 |
|
|
|
66,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
8,224,300 |
|
|
|
6,029,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average physical occupancy (6) |
|
|
88.7 |
% |
|
|
88.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
86.3 |
% |
|
|
88.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
||
Annualized revenue per occupied square foot (7) |
|
$ |
16.01 |
|
|
$ |
15.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
$ |
15.57 |
|
|
$ |
15.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
N/M Not meaningful
(1) |
The above table reflects the adoption of ASU 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842) on January 1, 2019, which requires our expected loss related to the collectability of rental payments which was previously recorded in property operating expenses as bad debt expense, to now be recorded as a reduction to self storage rental revenue. See footnote 2 below for a pro forma comparison of our operating results if we had applied this ASU to our 2018 same-store operating results. |
(2) |
Pro forma same-store operating results as adjusted for ASU 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842) as discussed above: |
|
|
Same-Store Facilities |
|
|||||||||
|
|
2019 |
|
|
2018, as adjusted |
|
|
% Change |
|
|||
Revenue |
|
$ |
80,363,783 |
|
|
$ |
78,528,571 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
Property operating expenses |
|
|
28,041,358 |
|
|
|
28,367,650 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
)% |
Property operating income |
|
$ |
52,322,425 |
|
|
$ |
50,160,921 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
The pro forma results shown have been impacted by the Self Administration Transaction along with other normal operations.
53
The same-store pro forma revenue growth of approximately $1.8 million includes approximately $0.7 million of incremental Tenant Programs revenues recognized in the year ended December 31, 2019 as a result of the Self Administration Transaction, along with approximately $1.1 million in same-store rental revenue growth, which represents same-store rental growth of approximately 1.4%.
The same-store pro forma property operating expenses decreased approximately $0.3 million consisting of net savings of approximately $2.0 million associated with being self-managed, partially offset by increases in same-store property operating expenses of approximately $1.8 million, or approximately 5.9%, primarily related to increased property taxes and advertising expense.
(3) |
Revenue includes rental revenue, Tenant Programs revenue, ancillary revenue, and administrative and late fees. |
(4) |
Property operating expenses excludes corporate general and administrative expenses, asset management fees, interest expense, depreciation, amortization expense, and acquisition expenses, but includes property management fees if applicable. |
(5) |
Of the total rentable square feet, parking represented approximately 695,000 square feet and 540,000 square feet as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. On a same-store basis, for the same periods, parking represented approximately 540,000 square feet. |
(6) |
Determined by dividing the sum of the month-end occupied square feet for the applicable group of facilities for each applicable period by the sum of their month-end rentable square feet for the period. |
(7) |
Determined by dividing the aggregate realized revenue for each applicable period by the aggregate of the month-end occupied square feet for the period. Properties are included in the respective calculations in their first full month of operations, as appropriate. We have excluded the realized rental revenue and occupied square feet related to parking herein for the purpose of calculating annualized rent per occupied square foot. |
The following table presents a reconciliation of net loss as presented on our consolidated statements of operations to property operating income, as stated above, for the periods indicated:
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(25,095,538 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,720,730 |
) |
Adjusted to exclude: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed REIT Platform revenue |
|
|
(3,068,306 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Asset management fees (1) |
|
|
3,622,559 |
|
|
|
5,445,528 |
|
Managed REIT Platform expenses |
|
|
2,739,556 |
|
|
|
— |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
10,461,453 |
|
|
|
4,848,447 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
29,605,278 |
|
|
|
20,379,694 |
|
Intangible amortization expense |
|
|
11,493,394 |
|
|
|
2,422,997 |
|
Contingent earnout expense |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Self administration transaction expenses |
|
|
1,572,238 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Acquisition expenses—affiliates |
|
|
84,061 |
|
|
|
72,179 |
|
Other property acquisition expenses |
|
|
141,489 |
|
|
|
1,054,159 |
|
Gain on sale of real estate |
|
|
(3,944,696 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
37,563,247 |
|
|
|
18,002,274 |
|
Interest expense—accretion of fair market value of secured debt |
|
|
(131,611 |
) |
|
|
(413,353 |
) |
Interest expense—debt issuance costs |
|
|
3,996,676 |
|
|
|
1,582,049 |
|
Net loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
2,647,633 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Gain resulting from acquisition of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(8,017,353 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Other |
|
|
624,958 |
|
|
|
701,203 |
|
Total property operating income |
|
$ |
64,495,038 |
|
|
$ |
50,374,447 |
|
54
(1) |
Asset management fees are included in Property operating expenses – affiliates in the consolidated statements of operations. |
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017
Total Self Storage Revenues
Total self storage revenues for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were approximately $80.4 million and $76.1 million, respectively. The increase in total self storage revenue of approximately $4.3 million (or 5.7%) is primarily attributable to same-store revenue growth of approximately $2.8 million and approximately $1.5 million related to a full year of operations for six self storage facilities acquired during the year ended December 31, 2017.
Property Operating Expenses
Property operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were approximately $25.2 million (or 31.4% of total self storage revenues) and $24.5 million (or 32.2% of total revenues), respectively. Property operating expenses includes the cost to operate our facilities including payroll, utilities, insurance, real estate taxes, and marketing. The increase in same-store property operating expenses of approximately $0.7 million is primarily attributable to an increase in advertising expense, repairs and maintenance, and property taxes, offset by a decrease in payroll.
Property Operating Expenses – Affiliates
Property operating expenses – affiliates for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were approximately $10.3 million and $10.6 million, respectively. Property operating expenses – affiliates includes property management fees and asset management fees. The decrease in property operating expenses – affiliates is primarily attributable to costs incurred in connection with the property management change (approximately $0.8 million) during the year ended December 31, 2017, offset by an increase in property management fees due to increased revenues (approximately $0.3 million).
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were approximately $4.8 million and $3.5 million, respectively. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of legal expenses, transfer agent fees, directors’ and officers’ insurance expense, an allocation of a portion of our Former Advisor’s payroll related costs, accounting expenses and board of directors’ related costs. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily attributable to increases in our Former Advisor’s payroll related and marketing costs as a result of the change in property management, board of directors’ costs related to the SSGT Mergers, and legal costs related to the Canadian amalgamation.
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses
Depreciation and amortization expenses for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were approximately $22.8 million and $33.5 million, respectively. Depreciation expense consists primarily of depreciation on the buildings and site improvements at our properties. Amortization expense consists of the amortization of intangible assets resulting from our acquisitions. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense is primarily attributable to certain of our intangible assets associated with in-place leases being fully amortized during 2017 and 2018.
Acquisition Expenses – Affiliates
Acquisition expenses – affiliates for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. These acquisition expenses primarily relate to the costs associated with the SSGT Merger prior to such merger becoming probable in accordance with our capitalization policy during 2018, and the six self storage facilities acquired during 2017.
Other Property Acquisition Expenses
Other property acquisition expenses for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were approximately $1.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2018, these costs primarily relate to costs for the SSGT Mergers prior to such mergers becoming probable in accordance with our capitalization policy.
55
Interest Expense and Accretion of Fair Market Value of Secured Debt
Interest expense and the accretion of fair market value of secured debt for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were approximately $17.6 million and $16.0 million, respectively. The increase of approximately $1.6 million is primarily attributable to the additional debt obtained in conjunction with the six self storage facilities acquired during 2017, as well as an increase in interest rates as it relates to our variable rate debt.
Interest Expense - Debt Issuance Costs
Interest expense - debt issuance costs for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were approximately $1.6 million and $2.2 million, respectively. The decrease in interest expense – debt issuance costs is primarily attributable to approximately $0.8 million of debt issuance cost that were directly expensed in accordance with GAAP during 2017.
Same-Store Facility Results – Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017
The following table sets forth operating data for our same-store facilities (those properties included in the consolidated results of operations since January 1, 2017, excluding the Oakville I property, which was a lease-up facility during 2017) for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. We consider the following data to be meaningful as this allows for the comparison of results without the effects of acquisition or development activity.
|
|
Same-Store Facilities |
|
|
Non Same-Store Facilities |
|
Total |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
% Change |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
% Change |
|
||||||||
Revenue (1) |
|
$ |
71,793,734 |
|
|
$ |
69,021,588 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
8,618,523 |
|
|
$ |
7,087,318 |
|
|
N/M |
|
$ |
80,412,257 |
|
|
$ |
76,108,906 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
Property operating expenses (2) |
|
|
26,228,483 |
|
|
|
25,525,292 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
3,809,327 |
|
|
|
3,471,935 |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
30,037,810 |
|
|
|
28,997,227 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
Property operating income |
|
$ |
45,565,251 |
|
|
$ |
43,496,296 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
$ |
4,809,196 |
|
|
$ |
3,615,383 |
|
|
N/M |
|
$ |
50,374,447 |
|
|
$ |
47,111,679 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
Number of facilities |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rentable square feet(3) |
|
|
5,433,400 |
|
|
|
5,433,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
596,200 |
|
|
|
596,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
6,029,600 |
|
|
|
6,029,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average physical occupancy(4) |
|
|
88.5 |
% |
|
|
92.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
88.5 |
% |
|
|
91.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
||
Annualized revenue per occupied square foot(5) |
|
$ |
15.81 |
|
|
$ |
14.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
$ |
15.89 |
|
|
$ |
14.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
N/M Not meaningful
(1) |
Revenue includes rental revenue, ancillary revenue, and administrative and late fees. |
(2) |
Property operating expenses excludes corporate general and administrative expenses, asset management fees, interest expense, depreciation, amortization expense and acquisition expenses and costs incurred in connection with the property management transition during 2017, but includes property management fees. |
(3) |
Of the total rentable square feet, parking represented approximately 540,000 square feet as of December 31, 2018 and 2017. On a same-store basis, for the same periods, parking represented approximately 530,000 square feet. |
(4) |
Determined by dividing the sum of the month-end occupied square feet for the applicable group of facilities for each applicable period by the sum of their month-end rentable square feet for the period. |
(5) |
Determined by dividing the aggregate realized revenue for each applicable period by the aggregate of the month-end occupied square feet for the period. Properties are included in the respective calculations in their first full month of operations, as appropriate. We have excluded the realized rental revenue and occupied square feet related to parking herein for the purpose of calculating annualized rent per occupied square foot. |
Our increase in same-store revenue of approximately $2.8 million was primarily the result of increased revenue per occupied square foot of approximately 9.5% net of decreased average physical occupancy of approximately 4.2% for the year ended December 31, 2018 over the year ended December 31, 2017. Contributing to the increase was approximately $1.1 million of Tenant Program related revenue.
56
Our same-store property operating expenses increased by approximately $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the year ended December 31, 2017 primarily due to an increase in property taxes, advertising expenses, and property management fees resulting from an increase in total revenue, partially offset by a decrease in payroll.
The following table presents a reconciliation of net loss, as presented on our consolidated statements of operations, to property operating income for the periods indicated:
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(3,720,730 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,986,290 |
) |
Adjusted to exclude: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs incurred in connection with the property management changes (1) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
775,709 |
|
Asset management fees (2) |
|
|
5,445,528 |
|
|
|
5,346,280 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
4,848,447 |
|
|
|
3,457,907 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
20,379,694 |
|
|
|
19,939,856 |
|
Intangible amortization expense |
|
|
2,422,997 |
|
|
|
13,512,217 |
|
Acquisition expenses—affiliates |
|
|
72,179 |
|
|
|
212,577 |
|
Other property acquisition expenses |
|
|
1,054,159 |
|
|
|
292,022 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
18,002,274 |
|
|
|
16,356,565 |
|
Interest expense—accretion of fair market value of secured debt |
|
|
(413,353 |
) |
|
|
(340,382 |
) |
Interest expense—debt issuance costs |
|
|
1,582,049 |
|
|
|
2,177,833 |
|
Other |
|
|
701,203 |
|
|
|
367,385 |
|
Total property operating income |
|
$ |
50,374,447 |
|
|
$ |
47,111,679 |
|
(1) |
Costs incurred in connection with the property management changes are included in Property operating expenses – affiliates in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017. |
(2) |
Asset management fees are included in Property operating expenses – affiliates in the consolidated statements of operations. |
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Funds from Operations
Funds from operations (“FFO”) is an industry wide metric promulgated by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, which we believe to be an appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a REIT. The use of FFO is recommended by the REIT industry as a supplemental performance measure.
We define FFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the standards established by the White Paper on FFO approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT, or the White Paper. The White Paper defines FFO as net income (loss) computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from sales of property and asset impairment write downs, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Additionally, gains and losses from change in control are excluded from the determination of FFO. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. Our FFO calculation complies with NAREIT’s policy described above.
FFO, as Adjusted
We use FFO, as adjusted, as an additional non-GAAP financial measure to evaluate our operating performance. We previously used Modified Funds from Operations (“MFFO”) (as defined by the Institute for Portfolio Alternatives) as a non-GAAP measure of operating performance. Management replaced the MFFO measure with FFO, as adjusted, because FFO, as adjusted, provides investors with supplemental performance information that is consistent with the performance models and analysis used by management. In addition, FFO, as adjusted, is a measure used among our peer group, which includes publicly traded REITs. Further, we believe FFO, as adjusted, is useful in comparing the sustainability of our operating performance with the sustainability of the operating performance of other real estate companies.
57
In determining FFO, as adjusted, we make further adjustments to the NAREIT computation of FFO to exclude the effects of non-real estate related intangible amortization, acquisition related costs, contingent earnout expenses, accretion of fair value of debt adjustments, gains or losses from extinguishment of debt, accretion of deferred tax liabilities, realized and unrealized gains/losses on foreign exchange transactions, and gains/losses on foreign exchange and interest rate derivatives not designated for hedge accounting, which we believe are not indicative of the Company’s overall long-term operating performance. We exclude these items from GAAP net income to arrive at FFO, as adjusted, as they are not the primary drivers in our decision-making process and excluding these items provides investors a view of our continuing operating portfolio performance over time and makes our results more comparable period to period and to other REITs, which in any respective period may experience fluctuations in such acquisition, merger or other similar activities that are not of a long-term operating performance nature. FFO, as adjusted, also reflects adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and jointly owned investments. We use FFO, as adjusted, as one measure of our operating performance when we formulate corporate goals and evaluate the effectiveness of our strategies.
Presentation of FFO and FFO, as adjusted, is intended to provide useful information to investors as they compare the operating performance of different REITs, although it should be noted that not all REITs calculate FFO and FFO, as adjusted, the same way, so comparisons with other REITs may not be meaningful. Furthermore, FFO and FFO, as adjusted, are not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) or income (loss) from continuing operations as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to cash flows from operations, which is an indication of our liquidity, or indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs including our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. FFO and FFO, as adjusted, should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) and should be reviewed in conjunction with other measurements as an indication of our performance.
58
Neither the SEC, NAREIT, nor any other regulatory body has passed judgment on the acceptability of the adjustments that we use to calculate FFO or FFO, as adjusted. In the future, the SEC, NAREIT or another regulatory body may decide to standardize the allowable adjustments across the publicly registered, non-traded REIT industry and we would have to adjust our calculation and characterization of FFO or FFO, as adjusted. The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss), which is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, to FFO and FFO, as adjusted, for each of the periods presented below:
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
|
|||
Net loss (attributable to common stockholders) |
|
$ |
(24,750,333 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,698,377 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,864,065 |
) |
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of real estate |
|
|
29,188,668 |
|
|
|
20,134,068 |
|
|
|
19,777,620 |
|
Amortization of real estate related intangible assets |
|
|
8,441,245 |
|
|
|
2,422,997 |
|
|
|
13,512,217 |
|
Deduct: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain resulting from acquisition of unconsolidated affiliates(1) |
|
|
(8,017,353 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Gain on sale of real estate |
|
|
(3,944,696 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Adjustment for noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(2,079,045 |
) |
|
|
(154,213 |
) |
|
|
(274,222 |
) |
FFO (attributable to common stockholders) |
|
|
(1,161,514 |
) |
|
|
18,704,475 |
|
|
|
18,151,550 |
|
Other Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible amortization expense - contracts(2) |
|
|
3,052,149 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Acquisition expenses(3) |
|
|
225,550 |
|
|
|
1,126,338 |
|
|
|
504,599 |
|
Self administration transaction expenses(4) |
|
|
1,572,238 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Contingent earnout expense(5) |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Accretion of fair market value of secured debt(6) |
|
|
(131,611 |
) |
|
|
(413,353 |
) |
|
|
(340,382 |
) |
Net loss on extinguishment of debt(7) |
|
|
2,647,633 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Foreign currency and interest rate derivative (gains) losses, net(8) |
|
|
730,719 |
|
|
|
151,777 |
|
|
|
(163,571 |
) |
Accretion of deferred tax liabilities(2) |
|
|
(806,083 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Adjustment for noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(619,663 |
) |
|
|
(3,957 |
) |
|
|
(3,773 |
) |
FFO, as adjusted (attributable to common stockholders) |
|
$ |
5,709,418 |
|
|
$ |
19,565,280 |
|
|
$ |
18,148,423 |
|
As discussed in the Results of Operations, our 2019 results have been significantly impacted by the SSGT Mergers and additional debt incurred to finance such acquisition. FFO, as adjusted was negatively impacted in the current year due to the additional interest expense associated with the new debt and due to many of the properties acquired in the SSGT Mergers being lease-up properties, many of which were not physically or economically stabilized. We expect that as the SSGT portfolio continues to lease-up and stabilize that it will be accretive to FFO, as adjusted as the net operating income increases. The information below should be read in conjunction with the discussion regarding the SSGT Mergers and Self Administration Transaction.
(1) |
Such gain was recorded as a result of obtaining control of certain of our Tenant Programs joint ventures in the Self Administration Transaction and in accordance with the NAREIT White Paper was excluded from the determination of FFO. |
(2) |
These items represent the amortization or accretion of assets or liabilities acquired in the Self Administration Transaction. As these item are adjustments related to acquisitions, FFO is adjusted for their effect to arrive at FFO, as adjusted, as a means of determining a comparable sustainable operating performance metric to other real estate companies. |
(3) |
In evaluating investments in real estate, we differentiate the costs to acquire the investment from the operations derived from the investment. Such information would be comparable only for publicly registered, non-traded REITs that have generally completed their acquisition activity and have other similar operating characteristics. |
59
(4) |
Self administration transaction expenses consist primarily of legal fees, as well as fees for other professionals and financial advisors incurred in connection with the Self Administration Transaction. We believe that adjusting for such non-recurring items provides useful supplemental information because such expenses may not be reflective of on-going operations and is consistent with management’s analysis of our operating performance. |
(5) |
The contingent earnout expense represents the adjustment to the fair value of the Class A-2 Units issued in connection with Self Administration Transaction. FFO is adjusted to arrive at FFO, as adjusted, as this item is not a primary driver in our decision-making process and excluding this provides investors a view of our continuing operating portfolio performance over time. |
(6) |
This represents the difference between the stated interest rate and the estimated market interest rate on assumed notes as of the date of acquisition. Such amounts have been excluded from FFO, as adjusted, because we believe FFO, as adjusted, provides useful supplementary information by focusing on operating fundamentals, rather than events not related to our normal operations. We are responsible for managing interest rate risk and do not rely on another party to manage such risk. |
(7) |
The net loss associated with the extinguishment of debt includes prepayment penalties, the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees, and other fees incurred. We believe that adjusting for such non-recurring items provides useful supplemental information because such losses may not be reflective of on-going transactions and operations and is consistent with management’s analysis of our operating performance. |
(8) |
This represents the mark-to-market adjustment for our derivative instruments not designated for hedge accounting and the ineffective portion of the change in fair value of derivatives recognized in earnings, as well as changes in foreign currency related to our foreign equity investments not classified as long term. These derivative contracts are intended to manage the Company’s exposure to interest rate and foreign currency risk which may not be reflective of our ongoing performance and may reflect unrealized impacts on our operating performance. Such amounts are recorded in “Other” within our consolidated statements of operations. |
Non-cash Items Included in Net Loss:
Provided below is additional information related to selected non-cash items included in net loss above, which may be helpful in assessing our operating results:
|
• |
Interest expense - debt issuance costs of approximately $4.0 million, $1.6 million, and $2.2 million respectively, were recognized for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017. |
Cash Flows
A comparison of cash flows for operating, investing and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
|
|
Change |
|
|||
Net cash flow provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
9,767,022 |
|
|
$ |
18,359,125 |
|
|
$ |
(8,592,103 |
) |
Investing activities |
|
$ |
(347,783,873 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,179,291 |
) |
|
$ |
(344,604,582 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
$ |
392,223,412 |
|
|
$ |
(12,541,473 |
) |
|
$ |
404,764,885 |
|
Cash flows provided by operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were approximately $9.8 million and $18.4 million, respectively, a decrease of approximately $8.6 million. The decrease in cash provided by our operating activities is primarily the result of a decrease in net income when excluding the impact of non-cash adjustments, including depreciation, amortization, net loss on extinguishment of debt, gain resulting from acquisition of unconsolidated affiliates and gain on sale of real estate. The decrease in net income when excluding the impact of non-cash adjustments and the gain on sale of real estate comprises a decrease in cash provided by operating activities of approximately $10.9 million, offset by an increase of approximately $2.3 million resulting from a change in working capital accounts.
Cash flows used in investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were approximately $347.8 million and $3.2 million, respectively, an increase in the use of cash of approximately $344.6 million. The change in cash used in investing activities primarily relates to cash consideration paid of approximately $345.5 million for the SSGT Mergers in the first quarter of 2019.
60
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were approximately $392.2 million and ($12.5 million), respectively, a change of approximately $404.8 million. The increase in cash provided by financing activities is primarily attributable to the approximately net $275 million increase in net debt issued in 2019, primarily related to the SSGT Mergers, and the issuance of $150 million in Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, offset by distributions of approximately $20.6 million.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Short-Term Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our Primary Offering terminated on January 9, 2017. We generally expect that we will meet our short-term liquidity requirements from the combination of existing cash balances, net cash provided by property operations and the Managed REIT Platform as well as the proceeds from further issuances of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. Alternatively, we may issue additional secured or unsecured financing from banks or other lenders.
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
On October 29, 2019 (the “Commitment Date”), we entered into a preferred stock purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Extra Space Storage LP (the “Investor”), a subsidiary of Extra Space Storage Inc. (NYSE: EXR), pursuant to which the Investor committed to purchase up to $200 million in shares (the aggregate shares to be purchased, the “Preferred Shares”) of our new Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A Convertible Preferred Stock”), in one or more closings (each, a “Closing,” and collectively, the “Closings”). The initial closing (the “Initial Closing”) in the amount of $150 million occurred on the Commitment Date. The Investor has committed to purchase up to an additional $50 million, at our option, within 12 months following the Initial Closing, subject to certain limitations. See Note 7, Preferred Equity, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report for additional information.
Distribution Policy and Distributions
Preferred Stock Dividends
The shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock rank senior to all other shares of our capital stock, including our common stock, with respect to rights to receive dividends and to participate in distributions or payments upon any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company. Dividends payable on each share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock will initially be equal to a rate of 6.25% per annum, which accrues daily but is payable quarterly in arrears. If the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock has not been redeemed on or prior to the fifth anniversary date of the Initial Closing, the dividend rate will increase an additional 0.75% per annum each year thereafter to a maximum of 9.0% per annum until the tenth anniversary of the Initial Closing, at which time the dividend rate shall increase 0.75% per annum each year thereafter until the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock is either converted or repurchased in full.
61
Common Stock Distributions
On December 18, 2019, our board of directors declared a distribution rate for the first quarter of 2020 of approximately $0.001639 per day per share on the outstanding shares of common stock payable to both Class A and Class T stockholders of record of such shares as shown on our books at the close of business on each day during the period, commencing on January 1, 2020 and continuing on each day thereafter through and including March 31, 2020. In connection with this distribution, after the stockholder servicing fee is paid, approximately $0.0014 per day will be paid per Class T share. Such distributions payable to each stockholder of record during a month will be paid the following month.
Background and History of Common Stock Distributions
Historically, we have primarily made distributions to our common stockholders using proceeds of the Offering in anticipation of future cash flow. As such, this reduced the amount of capital we ultimately had available to invest in properties. Because substantially all of our operations will be performed indirectly through our Operating Partnership, our ability to pay distributions depends in large part on our Operating Partnership’s ability to pay distributions to its partners, including to us. In the event we do not have enough cash from operations to fund cash distributions, we may borrow, issue additional securities or sell assets in order to fund the distributions. The terms of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock place certain restrictions on our ability to pay distributions to our common stockholders. In general, we are prohibited from paying distributions to our common stockholders other than regular cash dividends on a basis consistent with past practice and dividends payable in shares of common stock in connection with an initial listing of such shares. Accordingly, we are presently only permitted to pay cash distributions, which may be reinvested in stock pursuant to our DRP, unless otherwise approved by the holder of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. Absent the foregoing restrictions, our charter allows our board of directors to authorize payments to stockholders in cash or other assets of the Company or in stock, including in stock of one class payable to holders of stock of another class.
We may not be able to pay distributions from our cash flows from operations, in which case distributions may be paid in part from debt or other financing sources.
Distributions are paid to our common stockholders based on the record date selected by our board of directors. We currently declare and pay such distributions monthly based on daily declaration and record dates so that investors may be entitled to distributions immediately upon purchasing our shares. We expect to continue to regularly pay distributions unless our results of operations, our general financial condition, general economic conditions, or other factors inhibit us from doing so. Distributions are authorized at the discretion of our board of directors, which are directed, in substantial part, by its obligation to cause us to comply with the REIT requirements of the Code. Absent the restrictions noted above, our board of directors may increase, decrease or eliminate the distribution rate that is being paid on our common stock at any time. Distributions are made on all classes of our common stock at the same time. The per share amount of distributions on Class A Shares and Class T Shares differ because of different allocations of class-specific expenses. Specifically, distributions on Class T Shares are lower than distributions on Class A Shares because Class T Shares are subject to ongoing stockholder servicing fees. The funds that are available for distribution may be affected by a number of factors, including the following:
|
• |
our operating and interest expenses; |
|
• |
the amount of distributions or dividends received by us from our indirect real estate investments; |
|
• |
our ability to keep our properties occupied; |
|
• |
our ability to maintain or increase rental rates; |
|
• |
construction defects or capital improvements; |
|
• |
capital expenditures and reserves for such expenditures; |
|
• |
the issuance of additional shares; |
|
• |
financings and refinancings; and |
|
• |
dividends with respect to the outstanding shares of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. |
62
The following shows our distributions paid and the sources of such distributions for the respective periods presented:
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Distributions paid in cash – common stockholders |
|
$ |
18,207,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,566,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions paid in cash – Operating Partnership unitholders |
|
|
2,440,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions reinvested |
|
|
16,046,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,057,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions |
|
$ |
36,694,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33,877,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
Source of distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by operations |
|
$ |
9,767,022 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
% |
|
$ |
18,359,125 |
|
|
|
54.2 |
% |
Cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
10,880,643 |
|
|
|
29.7 |
% |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Offering proceeds from distribution reinvestment plan |
|
|
16,046,534 |
|
|
|
43.7 |
% |
|
|
15,518,267 |
|
|
|
45.8 |
% |
Total sources |
|
$ |
36,694,199 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
33,877,392 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
From our inception through December 31, 2019, we paid cumulative distributions of approximately $133.5 million, as compared to cumulative FFO of approximately $24.8 million. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we paid distributions of approximately $36.7 million, as compared to FFO of approximately ($1.2) million, which reflects acquisition related expenses of approximately $0.2 million, and a net loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately $2.6 million. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we paid distributions of approximately $33.9 million, as compared to FFO of approximately $18.7 million which reflects acquisition related expenses of approximately $1.1 million. The payment of distributions from sources other than FFO may reduce the amount of proceeds available for investment and operations or cause us to incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds.
We must distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our taxable income each year in order to meet the requirements for being treated as a REIT under the Code. Our directors may authorize distributions in excess of this percentage as they deem appropriate. Because we may receive income from interest or rents at various times during our fiscal year, distributions may not reflect our income earned in that particular distribution period, but may be made in anticipation of cash flow that we expect to receive during a later period and may be made in advance of actual receipt of funds in an attempt to make distributions relatively uniform. To allow for such differences in timing between the receipt of income and the payment of expenses, and the effect of required debt payments, among other things, we could be required to borrow funds from third parties on a short-term basis, issue new securities, or sell assets to meet the distribution requirements that are necessary to achieve the tax benefits associated with qualifying as a REIT. We are not prohibited from undertaking such activities by our charter, bylaws or investment policies, and we may use an unlimited amount from any source to pay our distributions. These methods of obtaining funding could affect future distributions by increasing operating costs and decreasing available cash, which could reduce the value of our stockholders’ investment in our shares. In addition, such distributions may constitute a return of investors’ capital.
We may not be able to pay distributions from our cash flows from operations, in which case distributions may be paid in part from proceeds received through further issuances of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, from debt financing and pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. The payment of distributions from sources other than cash flows from operations may reduce the amount of proceeds available for investment and operations or cause us to incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds.
Over the long-term, we expect that a greater percentage of our distributions will be paid from cash flows from operations. However, our operating performance cannot be accurately predicted and may deteriorate in the future due to numerous factors, including our ability to raise and invest capital at favorable yields, the financial performance of our investments in the current real estate and financial environment and the types and mix of investments in our portfolio. As a result, future distributions declared and paid may exceed cash flow from operations.
Indebtedness
As of December 31, 2019, our total indebtedness was approximately $712.7 million, which included approximately $302.2 million in fixed rate debt, $417.5 million in variable rate debt and approximately $0.6 million in net debt premium less approximately $7.6 million in net debt issuance costs. One of our loans has an initial maturity date within the next year. We intend to either extend this loan pursuant to existing extension options, or refinance through other debt financing. See Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about our indebtedness.
63
Long-Term Liquidity and Capital Resources
On a long-term basis, our principal demands for funds will be for property acquisitions, either directly or through entity interests, for the payment of operating expenses and distributions, and for the payment of interest on our outstanding indebtedness, if any.
Long-term potential future sources of capital include proceeds from secured or unsecured financings from banks or other lenders, issuance of equity instruments, undistributed funds from operations, and additional public or private offerings. To the extent we are not able to secure requisite financing in the form of a credit facility or other debt, we will be dependent upon proceeds from the issuance of equity securities and cash flows from operating activities in order to meet our long-term liquidity requirements and to fund our distributions.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2019:
|
|
Payments due during the years ending December 31: |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2021-2022 |
|
|
2023-2024 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|||||
Debt interest(1) |
|
$ |
140,032,127 |
|
|
$ |
33,054,106 |
|
|
$ |
46,471,905 |
|
|
$ |
26,877,757 |
|
|
$ |
33,628,359 |
|
Debt principal(2) |
|
|
719,769,887 |
|
|
|
86,208,937 |
|
|
|
336,250,414 |
|
|
|
50,419,724 |
|
|
|
246,890,812 |
|
Total contractual obligations |
|
$ |
859,802,014 |
|
|
$ |
119,263,043 |
|
|
$ |
382,722,319 |
|
|
$ |
77,297,481 |
|
|
$ |
280,519,171 |
|
(1) |
Interest expense for fixed rate debt was calculated based upon the contractual rate and the interest expense on variable rate debt was calculated based on the rate in effect on December 31, 2019. Debt denominated in foreign currency has been converted based on the rate in effect as of December 31, 2019. |
(2) |
Amount represents principal payments only, excluding net debt premium and debt issuance costs. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Other than our minority equity investment in an auction company (See Note 10, Related Party Transactions, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report), we do not currently have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships. Such entities are often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which typically are established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
Subsequent Events
Please see Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report.
Seasonality
We believe that we will experience minor seasonal fluctuations in the occupancy levels of our facilities, which we believe will be slightly higher over the summer months due to increased moving activity.
ITEM 7A. |
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive instruments. In pursuing our business plan, we expect that the primary market risk to which we will be exposed is interest rate risk and to a lesser extent, foreign currency risk. We may be exposed to the effects of interest rate changes primarily as a result of borrowings used to maintain liquidity and fund acquisition, expansion, and financing of our real estate investment portfolio and operations. Our interest rate risk management objectives will be to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs. To achieve our objectives, we may borrow at fixed rates or variable rates. We may also enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and caps in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on a related financial instrument. We will not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes.
64
As of December 31, 2019, our net debt was approximately $712.7 million, which included approximately $302.2 million in fixed rate debt, $417.5 million in variable rate debt and approximately $0.6 million in net debt premium less approximately $7.6 million in net debt issuance costs. As of December 31, 2018, our net debt was approximately $406.1 million, which included approximately $225.6 million in fixed rate debt, $182.6 million in variable rate debt and approximately $1.2 million in net debt premium less approximately $3.4 million in net debt issuance costs. Our debt instruments were entered into for other than trading purposes. Changes in interest rates have different impacts on the fixed and variable debt. A change in interest rates on fixed rate debt impacts its fair value but has no impact on interest incurred or cash flows. A change in interest rates on variable debt could impact the interest incurred and cash flows and its fair value. If the underlying rate of the related index on our variable rate debt were to increase by 100 basis points, the increase in interest would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $1.0 million annually.
Interest rate risk amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our financial instruments. These analyses do not consider the effect of any change in overall economic activity that could occur. Further, in the event of a change of that magnitude, we may take actions to further mitigate our exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, these analyses assume no changes in our financial structure.
The following table summarizes annual debt maturities and average interest rates on our outstanding debt as of December 31, 2019:
|
|
Year Ending December 31, |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2023 |
|
|
2024 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
|||||||
Fixed rate debt |
|
$ |
708,277 |
|
|
$ |
1,294,639 |
|
|
$ |
2,914,829 |
|
|
$ |
3,384,578 |
|
|
$ |
47,035,146 |
|
|
$ |
246,890,812 |
|
|
$ |
302,228,281 |
|
Average interest rate(1) |
|
|
4.63 |
% |
|
|
4.63 |
% |
|
|
4.63 |
% |
|
|
4.63 |
% |
|
|
4.59 |
% |
|
|
4.52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Variable rate debt |
|
$ |
85,500,660 |
|
|
$ |
11,528,946 |
|
|
$ |
320,512,000 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
417,541,606 |
|
Average interest rate(1) |
|
|
4.60 |
% |
|
|
4.66 |
% |
|
|
4.67 |
% |
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Interest expense for fixed rate debt was calculated based upon the contractual rate and the interest expense on variable rate debt was calculated based on the rate in effect on December 31, 2019. Debt denominated in foreign currency has been converted based on the rate in effect as of December 31, 2019. |
Currently, our only foreign exchange rate risk comes from our Canadian properties and the Canadian Dollar (“CAD”). Our existing foreign currency hedge mitigates most of our foreign currency exposure of our net CAD denominated investments; however, we generate all of our revenues and expend essentially all of our operating expenses and third party debt service costs related to our Canadian Properties in CAD. As a result of fluctuations in currency exchange, our cash flows and results of operations could be affected.
ITEM 8. |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
The financial statements and supplementary data filed as part of this report are set forth below beginning on page F-1 of this report.
ITEM 9. |
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
None.
65
ITEM 9A. |
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for us. Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated, as of December 31, 2019, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting using the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. |
OTHER INFORMATION |
The Company will hold its 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2020 Annual Meeting”) on June 12, 2020. The Company currently contemplates that its definitive proxy materials will be made available to stockholders beginning on or about April 15, 2020. Stockholders may submit written proposals to the Company on matters appropriate for stockholder action at the 2020 Annual Meeting by following the rules of the SEC and the requirements of the Company’s bylaws. For such proposals to be considered for inclusion in the Company’s proxy materials, such proposals must be received by the Company by April 5, 2020 which we believe is a reasonable time before we begin to print and mail our proxy materials for the 2020 Annual Meeting. Pursuant to the Company’s bylaws, for nominations or other business to be properly brought by a stockholder at the 2020 Annual Meeting, the stockholder must give timely notice thereof in writing to the secretary of the Company. Because the date of the 2020 Annual Meeting is being advanced by more than 30 days before the first anniversary of the date of mailing of the notice for the 2019 Annual Meeting, in accordance with the Company’s bylaws, the deadline for notice by a stockholder is the 10th day following the day on which disclosure of the date of mailing of the notice for such meeting is first made, or April 6, 2020.
66
PART III
ITEM 10. |
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the 2020 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC.
ITEM 11. |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the 2020 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC.
ITEM 12. |
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the 2020 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC.
ITEM 13. |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the 2020 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC.
ITEM 14. |
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES |
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the 2020 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC.
67
PART IV
ITEM 15. |
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
|
(a) |
List of Documents Filed. |
|
1. |
The list of the financial statements contained herein is set forth on page F-1 hereof. |
|
2. |
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation is set forth beginning on page S-1 hereof. All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are not required under the related instructions or are not applicable and therefore have been omitted. |
|
3. |
The Exhibits filed in response to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed on the Exhibit Index below. |
|
(b) |
See (a) 3 above. |
|
(c) |
See (a) 2 above. |
ITEM 16. |
FORM 10-K SUMMARY |
None.
68
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019
Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
F-9 |
|
|
F-11 |
|
|
|
|
Financial Statement Schedule |
|
|
|
S-1 |
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc.
Ladera Ranch, California
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ BDO USA, LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2017.
Costa Mesa, California
March 27, 2020
F-2
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2019 and 2018
|
|
December 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate facilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
332,350,688 |
|
|
$ |
269,522,776 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
780,969,455 |
|
|
|
507,580,145 |
|
Site improvements |
|
|
60,505,225 |
|
|
|
43,193,105 |
|
|
|
|
1,173,825,368 |
|
|
|
820,296,026 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(83,692,491 |
) |
|
|
(54,264,685 |
) |
|
|
|
1,090,132,877 |
|
|
|
766,031,341 |
|
Construction in process |
|
|
12,237,722 |
|
|
|
130,383 |
|
Real estate facilities, net |
|
|
1,102,370,599 |
|
|
|
766,161,724 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
62,279,757 |
|
|
|
10,272,020 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
6,291,366 |
|
|
|
3,740,188 |
|
Investments in and advances to Managed REITs |
|
|
6,072,399 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
6,318,037 |
|
|
|
14,580,417 |
|
Debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
36,907 |
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization |
|
|
30,040,426 |
|
|
|
1,562,781 |
|
Trademarks, net of accumulated amortization |
|
|
19,688,167 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
78,372,980 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,311,433,731 |
|
|
$ |
796,354,037 |
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt, net |
|
$ |
712,733,002 |
|
|
$ |
406,084,103 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
18,576,230 |
|
|
|
7,691,990 |
|
Due to affiliates |
|
|
1,624,474 |
|
|
|
2,203,837 |
|
Distributions payable |
|
|
5,159,105 |
|
|
|
2,890,395 |
|
Contingent earnout |
|
|
31,100,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
6,609,571 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
775,802,382 |
|
|
|
418,870,325 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable common stock |
|
|
43,391,362 |
|
|
|
32,226,815 |
|
Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value; 200,000 shares authorized; 150,000 shares issued and outstanding with an aggregate liquidation preference of $151,665,753 at December 31, 2019, and none issued and outstanding at December 31, 2018 |
|
|
146,426,164 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc. equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock, $0.001 par value; 350,000,000 shares authorized; 51,435,124 and 50,437,059 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively |
|
|
51,435 |
|
|
|
50,437 |
|
Class T common stock, $0.001 par value; 350,000,000 shares authorized; 7,699,893 and 7,533,790 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively |
|
|
7,700 |
|
|
|
7,534 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
491,433,240 |
|
|
|
500,474,807 |
|
Distributions |
|
|
(128,642,787 |
) |
|
|
(94,248,326 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(87,090,486 |
) |
|
|
(62,340,153 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(1,955,335 |
) |
|
|
1,390,354 |
|
Total SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc. equity |
|
|
273,803,767 |
|
|
|
345,334,653 |
|
Noncontrolling interests in our Operating Partnership |
|
|
71,988,256 |
|
|
|
(77,756 |
) |
Other noncontrolling interests |
|
|
21,800 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total noncontrolling interests |
|
|
72,010,056 |
|
|
|
(77,756 |
) |
Total equity |
|
|
345,813,823 |
|
|
|
345,256,897 |
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
1,311,433,731 |
|
|
$ |
796,354,037 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
|
|||
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Self storage rental revenue |
|
$ |
99,494,560 |
|
|
$ |
78,473,091 |
|
|
$ |
75,408,257 |
|
Ancillary operating revenue |
|
|
3,706,700 |
|
|
|
1,939,166 |
|
|
|
700,649 |
|
Managed REIT Platform revenue |
|
|
3,068,306 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Reimbursable costs from Managed REITs |
|
|
3,258,983 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
109,528,549 |
|
|
|
80,412,257 |
|
|
|
76,108,906 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses |
|
|
35,723,111 |
|
|
|
25,228,704 |
|
|
|
24,487,854 |
|
Property operating expenses – affiliates |
|
|
6,605,670 |
|
|
|
10,254,634 |
|
|
|
10,631,362 |
|
Managed REIT Platform expenses |
|
|
2,739,556 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Reimbursable costs from Managed REITs |
|
|
3,258,983 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
10,461,453 |
|
|
|
4,848,447 |
|
|
|
3,457,907 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
29,605,278 |
|
|
|
20,379,694 |
|
|
|
19,939,856 |
|
Intangible amortization expense |
|
|
11,493,394 |
|
|
|
2,422,997 |
|
|
|
13,512,217 |
|
Contingent earnout expense |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Self administration transaction expenses |
|
|
1,572,238 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Acquisition expenses – affiliates |
|
|
84,061 |
|
|
|
72,179 |
|
|
|
212,577 |
|
Other property acquisition expenses |
|
|
141,489 |
|
|
|
1,054,159 |
|
|
|
292,022 |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
101,885,233 |
|
|
|
64,260,814 |
|
|
|
72,533,795 |
|
Gain on sale of real estate |
|
|
3,944,696 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Operating income |
|
|
11,588,012 |
|
|
|
16,151,443 |
|
|
|
3,575,111 |
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(37,563,247 |
) |
|
|
(18,002,274 |
) |
|
|
(16,356,565 |
) |
Interest expense – accretion of fair market value of secured debt |
|
|
131,611 |
|
|
|
413,353 |
|
|
|
340,382 |
|
Interest expense – debt issuance costs |
|
|
(3,996,676 |
) |
|
|
(1,582,049 |
) |
|
|
(2,177,833 |
) |
Net loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(2,647,633 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Gain resulting from acquisition of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
8,017,353 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Other |
|
|
(624,958 |
) |
|
|
(701,203 |
) |
|
|
(367,385 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
(25,095,538 |
) |
|
|
(3,720,730 |
) |
|
|
(14,986,290 |
) |
Net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interests in our Operating Partnership |
|
|
2,010,959 |
|
|
|
22,353 |
|
|
|
122,225 |
|
Less: Distributions to preferred stockholders |
|
|
(1,665,754 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Net loss attributable to SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc. common stockholders |
|
$ |
(24,750,333 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,698,377 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,864,065 |
) |
Net loss per Class A share – basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.42 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
Net loss per Class T share – basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.42 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
Weighted average Class A shares outstanding – basic and diluted |
|
|
50,734,472 |
|
|
|
49,902,967 |
|
|
|
48,781,865 |
|
Weighted average Class T shares outstanding – basic and diluted |
|
|
7,607,654 |
|
|
|
7,441,250 |
|
|
|
7,240,953 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
|
|||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(25,095,538 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,720,730 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,986,290 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
2,371,517 |
|
|
|
(4,850,547 |
) |
|
|
3,947,683 |
|
Foreign currency hedge contract gains (losses) |
|
|
(3,226,682 |
) |
|
|
5,251,438 |
|
|
|
(4,101,495 |
) |
Interest rate swap and cap contract gains (losses) |
|
|
(2,575,366 |
) |
|
|
(379,745 |
) |
|
|
145,070 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(3,430,531 |
) |
|
|
21,146 |
|
|
|
(8,742 |
) |
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
(28,526,069 |
) |
|
|
(3,699,584 |
) |
|
|
(14,995,032 |
) |
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss attributable to the noncontrolling interests in our Operating Partnership |
|
|
2,095,801 |
|
|
|
22,226 |
|
|
|
122,296 |
|
Comprehensive loss attributable to SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc. common stockholders |
|
$ |
(26,430,268 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,677,358 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,872,736 |
) |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Class A |
|
|
Class T |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Common Stock Par Value |
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Common Stock Par Value |
|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital |
|
|
Distributions |
|
|
Accumulated Deficit |
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|
Total SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc. Equity |
|
|
Noncontrolling Interests |
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
Preferred Equity |
|
|
Redeemable Common Stock |
|
|||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2016 |
|
|
47,174,543 |
|
|
$ |
47,174 |
|
|
|
6,585,799 |
|
|
$ |
6,586 |
|
|
$ |
480,692,731 |
|
|
$ |
(27,665,337 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,777,711 |
) |
|
$ |
1,377,950 |
|
|
$ |
410,681,393 |
|
|
$ |
(48,470 |
) |
|
$ |
410,632,923 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
10,711,682 |
|
Gross proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
1,027,612 |
|
|
|
1,028 |
|
|
|
564,591 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
17,309,777 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
17,311,370 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
17,311,370 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Offering costs |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,748,589 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,748,589 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,748,589 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Issuance of limited partnership units in our Operating Partnership |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,875,454 |
|
|
|
4,875,454 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Changes to redeemable common stock |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(16,004,705 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(16,004,705 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(16,004,705 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
16,004,705 |
|
Redemptions of common stock |
|
|
(181,413 |
) |
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
(7,360 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(2,219,328 |
) |
Distributions |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(32,896,167 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(32,896,167 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(32,896,167 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Distributions for noncontrolling interests |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(277,290 |
) |
|
|
(277,290 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Issuance of shares for distribution reinvestment plan |
|
|
1,365,350 |
|
|
|
1,365 |
|
|
|
207,112 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
16,004,705 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
16,006,277 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
16,006,277 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
33,971 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
33,971 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
33,971 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Net loss attributable to SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc. |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(14,864,065 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(14,864,065 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(14,864,065 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interests in our Operating Partnership |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(122,225 |
) |
|
|
(122,225 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,947,683 |
|
|
|
3,947,683 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,947,683 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Foreign currency forward contract loss |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(4,101,495 |
) |
|
|
(4,101,495 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(4,101,495 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Interest rate swap contract gain and cap contract gain |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
145,070 |
|
|
|
145,070 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
145,070 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2017 |
|
|
49,386,092 |
|
|
|
49,386 |
|
|
|
7,350,142 |
|
|
|
7,351 |
|
|
|
496,287,890 |
|
|
|
(60,561,504 |
) |
|
|
(58,641,776 |
) |
|
|
1,369,208 |
|
|
|
378,510,555 |
|
|
|
4,427,469 |
|
|
|
382,938,024 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
24,497,059 |
|
F-6
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Class A |
|
|
Class T |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Common Stock Par Value |
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Common Stock Par Value |
|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital |
|
|
Distributions |
|
|
Accumulated Deficit |
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|
Total SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc. Equity |
|
|
Noncontrolling Interests |
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
Preferred Equity |
|
|
Redeemable Common Stock |
|
|||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2017 |
|
|
49,386,092 |
|
|
|
49,386 |
|
|
|
7,350,142 |
|
|
|
7,351 |
|
|
|
496,287,890 |
|
|
|
(60,561,504 |
) |
|
|
(58,641,776 |
) |
|
|
1,369,208 |
|
|
|
378,510,555 |
|
|
|
4,427,469 |
|
|
|
382,938,024 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
24,497,059 |
|
Conversion of OP Units to common stock |
|
|
483,124 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,253,526 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,254,009 |
|
|
|
(4,254,009 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Redemption of interest in subsidiary |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(125,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(125,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(125,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Offering costs |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(16,902 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(16,902 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(16,902 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Issuance of restricted stock |
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Changes to redeemable common stock |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(16,055,585 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(16,055,585 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(16,055,585 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
16,055,585 |
|
Redemptions of common stock |
|
|
(768,313 |
) |
|
|
(768 |
) |
|
|
(19,664 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(788 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(788 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(8,325,829 |
) |
Distributions |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(33,686,822 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(33,686,822 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(33,686,822 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Distributions for noncontrolling interests |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(228,863 |
) |
|
|
(228,863 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Issuance of shares for distribution reinvestment plan |
|
|
1,325,656 |
|
|
|
1,325 |
|
|
|
203,312 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
16,055,585 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
16,057,113 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
16,057,113 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
75,293 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
75,293 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
75,293 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Net loss attributable to SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc. |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(3,698,377 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(3,698,377 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(3,698,377 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interests in our Operating Partnership |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(22,353 |
) |
|
|
(22,353 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(4,850,547 |
) |
|
|
(4,850,547 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(4,850,547 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Foreign currency forward contract gain |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5,251,438 |
|
|
|
5,251,438 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5,251,438 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Interest rate swap and cap contract losses |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(379,745 |
) |
|
|
(379,745 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(379,745 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2018 |
|
|
50,437,059 |
|
|
|
50,437 |
|
|
|
7,533,790 |
|
|
|
7,534 |
|
|
|
500,474,807 |
|
|
|
(94,248,326 |
) |
|
|
(62,340,153 |
) |
|
|
1,390,354 |
|
|
|
345,334,653 |
|
|
|
(77,756 |
) |
|
|
345,256,897 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
32,226,815 |
|
F-7
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Class A |
|
|
Class T |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Common Stock Par Value |
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Common Stock Par Value |
|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital |
|
|
Distributions |
|
|
Accumulated Deficit |
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|
Total SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc. Equity |
|
|
Noncontrolling Interests |
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
Preferred Equity |
|
|
Redeemable Common Stock |
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2018 |
|
|
50,437,059 |
|
|
|
50,437 |
|
|
|
7,533,790 |
|
|
|
7,534 |
|
|
|
500,474,807 |
|
|
|
(94,248,326 |
) |
|
|
(62,340,153 |
) |
|
|
1,390,354 |
|
|
|
345,334,653 |
|
|
|
(77,756 |
) |
|
|
345,256,897 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
32,226,815 |
|
|
Offering costs |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(42,039 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(42,039 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(42,039 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Issuance of Preferred Equity |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
150,000,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Preferred equity issuance costs |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(3,573,836 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
Issuance of limited partnership units in our Operating Partnership in connection with the SSGT Mergers |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,217,399 |
|
|
|
4,217,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Issuance of limited partnership units in our Operating Partnership in connection with the Self Administration Transaction |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
63,643,000 |
|
|
|
63,643,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Issuance of limited partnership units in our Operating Partnership in exchange for special limited partnership interest |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
9,687,035 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
9,687,035 |
|
|
|
9,112,965 |
|
|
|
18,800,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Contribution of special limited partnership interest in exchange for limited partnership interests in our Operating Partnership |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(18,800,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(18,800,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(18,800,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Noncontrolling interests related to the consolidated Tenant Programs joint ventures |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
21,800 |
|
|
|
21,800 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Redemption of limited partnership interests held by our Former Advisor |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(291,103 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(291,103 |
) |
|
|
91,103 |
|
|
|
(200,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Changes to redeemable common stock |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(16,045,030 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(16,045,030 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(16,045,030 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
16,046,535 |
|
|
Redemptions of common stock |
|
|
(556,575 |
) |
|
|
(557 |
) |
|
|
(35,079 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(592 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(592 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(4,881,988 |
) |
|
Issuance of restricted stock |
|
|
251,993 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Distributions |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(34,394,461 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(34,394,461 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(34,394,461 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(2,902,654 |
) |
|
|
(2,902,654 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Issuance of shares for distribution reinvestment plan |
|
|
1,302,647 |
|
|
|
1,303 |
|
|
|
201,182 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
16,045,030 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
16,046,534 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
16,046,534 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
404,540 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
404,540 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
404,540 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Net loss attributable to SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc. |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(24,750,333 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(24,750,333 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(24,750,333 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interests in our Operating Partnership |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(2,010,959 |
) |
|
|
(2,010,959 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,311,488 |
|
|
|
2,311,488 |
|
|
|
60,029 |
|
|
|
2,371,517 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Foreign currency forward contract loss |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(3,030,727 |
) |
|
|
(3,030,727 |
) |
|
|
(195,955 |
) |
|
|
(3,226,682 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Interest rate swap and cap contract loss |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(2,626,450 |
) |
|
|
(2,626,450 |
) |
|
|
51,084 |
|
|
|
(2,575,366 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2019 |
|
|
51,435,124 |
|
|
$ |
51,435 |
|
|
|
7,699,893 |
|
|
$ |
7,700 |
|
|
$ |
491,433,240 |
|
|
$ |
(128,642,787 |
) |
|
$ |
(87,090,486 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,955,335 |
) |
|
$ |
273,803,767 |
|
|
$ |
72,010,056 |
|
|
$ |
345,813,823 |
|
|
$ |
146,426,164 |
|
|
$ |
43,391,362 |
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-8
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, Inc. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
|
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(25,095,538 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,720,730 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,986,290 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
41,098,672 |
|
|
|
22,802,691 |
|
|
|
33,452,073 |
|
Change in deferred tax liability |
|
|
(806,083 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Accretion of fair market value adjustment of secured debt |
|
|
(131,611 |
) |
|
|
(413,353 |
) |
|
|
(340,382 |
) |
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
|
|
3,996,676 |
|
|
|
1,582,049 |
|
|
|
1,424,790 |
|
Net loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
2,647,633 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
404,540 |
|
|
|
75,293 |
|
|
|
33,971 |
|
Contingent earnout expense |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Unrealized foreign currency and derivative (gains) losses |
|
|
(797,999 |
) |
|
|
151,777 |
|
|
|
(288,603 |
) |
Gain resulting from acquisition of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(8,017,353 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Gain on sale of real estate |
|
|
(3,944,696 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Increase (decrease) in cash from changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
(835,114 |
) |
|
|
(1,237,429 |
) |
|
|
(1,421,813 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
1,576,029 |
|
|
|
(794,156 |
) |
|
|
1,721,910 |
|
Managed REITs receivables |
|
|
(122,629 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Due to affiliates |
|
|
(405,505 |
) |
|
|
(87,017 |
) |
|
|
339,357 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
9,767,022 |
|
|
|
18,359,125 |
|
|
|
19,935,013 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSGT Mergers, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(345,538,595 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Self Administration Transaction, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(3,292,958 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Purchase of real estate |
|
|
(9,435,343 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(49,432,644 |
) |
Additions to real estate |
|
|
(12,291,574 |
) |
|
|
(1,952,738 |
) |
|
|
(4,165,926 |
) |
Deposits on acquisition of real estate facilities |
|
|
(200,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Investment in real estate joint ventures |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(3,358,814 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Net proceeds from the sale of real estate |
|
|
15,721,610 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Settlement of foreign currency hedges |
|
|
918,558 |
|
|
|
2,132,261 |
|
|
|
(3,947,758 |
) |
Purchase of foreign currency hedge |
|
|
(147,347 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Settlement of company owned life insurance |
|
|
3,122,962 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Proceeds from sale of real estate joint venture |
|
|
3,358,814 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(347,783,873 |
) |
|
|
(3,179,291 |
) |
|
|
(57,546,328 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross proceeds from issuance of debt |
|
|
535,852,363 |
|
|
|
91,229,806 |
|
|
|
166,186,951 |
|
Repayment of debt |
|
|
(251,732,077 |
) |
|
|
(72,513,082 |
) |
|
|
(130,671,050 |
) |
Scheduled principal payments on debt |
|
|
(802,789 |
) |
|
|
(1,892,622 |
) |
|
|
(1,564,587 |
) |
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(8,531,362 |
) |
|
|
(1,892,495 |
) |
|
|
(548,206 |
) |
Prepaid debt issuance costs |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,075,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Debt defeasance costs |
|
|
(1,690,703 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Gross proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
18,879,477 |
|
Common stock offering costs |
|
|
(709,842 |
) |
|
|
(693,971 |
) |
|
|
(2,339,113 |
) |
Gross proceeds from issuance of preferred stock |
|
|
150,000,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Preferred stock offering costs |
|
|
(3,573,836 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Redemption of common stock |
|
|
(5,740,677 |
) |
|
|
(7,758,830 |
) |
|
|
(1,741,113 |
) |
Distributions paid to common stockholders |
|
|
(18,207,418 |
) |
|
|
(17,566,799 |
) |
|
|
(16,671,024 |
) |
Redemption of noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(200,000 |
) |
|
|
(125,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests in our Operating Partnership |
|
|
(2,440,247 |
) |
|
|
(253,480 |
) |
|
|
(252,671 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
392,223,412 |
|
|
|
(12,541,473 |
) |
|
|
31,278,664 |
|
Impact of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
|
352,354 |
|
|
|
(494,565 |
) |
|
|
166,258 |
|
Change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash |
|
|
54,558,915 |
|
|
|
2,143,796 |
|
|
|
(6,166,393 |
) |
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash beginning of period |
|
|
14,012,208 |
|
|
|
11,868,412 |
|
|
|
18,034,805 |
|
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash end of period |
|
$ |
68,571,123 |
|
|
$ |
14,012,208 |
|
|
$ |
11,868,412 |
|
F-9
Supplemental disclosures and non-cash transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
35,942,900 |
|
|
$ |
17,976,018 |
|
|
$ |
15,994,203 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of noncash activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares pursuant to distribution reinvestment plan |
|
$ |
16,046,534 |
|
|
$ |
16,057,113 |
|
|
$ |
16,006,277 |
|
Distributions payable |
|
$ |
5,159,105 |
|
|
$ |
2,890,395 |
|
|
$ |
2,852,100 |
|
Redemption of common stock included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
431,326 |
|
|
$ |
1,291,520 |
|
|
$ |
723,733 |
|
Deposit applied to the purchase of real estate |
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
Real estate and construction in process included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
1,420,217 |
|
|
$ |
617,667 |
|
|
$ |
165,806 |
|
Issuance of units in our Operating Partnership in SSGT Mergers |
|
$ |
4,217,399 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Debt assumed in SSGT Mergers |
|
$ |
5,038,435 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Net liabilities assumed in SSGT Mergers |
|
$ |
1,712,596 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Issuance of Class A-1 units in our Operating Partnership in the Self Administration Transaction |
|
$ |
63,643,000 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Debt assumed in the Self Administration Transaction |
|
$ |
19,219,126 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Contingent earnout consideration issued in the Self Administration Transaction |
|
$ |
30,900,000 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Issuance of limited partnership units in our Operating Partnership in exchange for special limited partnership interest |
|
$ |
18,800,000 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Deferred tax liabilities related to the Self Administration Transaction |
|
$ |
7,415,654 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities assumed in the Self Administration Transaction |
|
$ |
722,286 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Transfer of other assets to debt issuance costs |
|
$ |
1,075,000 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Foreign currency contracts, interest rate swaps, and interest rate cap contract in accounts payable and accrued liabilities and other assets |
|
$ |
3,575,580 |
|
|
$ |
2,774,111 |
|
|
$ |
76,955 |
|
Issuance of common stock in exchange for units in our Operating Partnership |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
4,254,009 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Debt and accrued liabilities assumed during purchase of real estate |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
39,967,787 |
|
Issuance of units in our Operating Partnership for purchase of real estate facilities |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
4,875,454 |
|
Offering costs included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
1,410 |
|
Offering costs included in due to affiliates |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
299,299 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-10
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Note 1. Organization
SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc. (f/k/a Strategic Storage Trust II, Inc.), a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), is a self-managed and fully-integrated self storage real estate investment trust (“REIT”), formed on January 8, 2013 under the Maryland General Corporation Law. The Company’s year-end is December 31. As used in this report, “we,” “us,” “our,” and “Company” refer to SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc. and each of our subsidiaries.
Recent Developments
On June 28, 2019, we and our operating partnership, SmartStop OP, L.P. (f/k/a Strategic Storage Operating Partnership II, L.P.) (our “Operating Partnership”), and SmartStop TRS, Inc. (f/k/a Strategic Storage TRS II, Inc.) (the “TRS”) entered into a series of transactions, agreements, and amendments to our existing agreements and arrangements (such agreements and amendments hereinafter referred to collectively as the “Self Administration Transaction”), with SmartStop Asset Management LLC, our former sponsor (“SAM”) and SmartStop OP Holdings, LLC (“SS OP Holdings”), a subsidiary of SAM, pursuant to which, effective June 28, 2019, we acquired the self storage advisory, asset management and property management businesses and certain joint venture interests of SAM (the “Self Storage Platform”), along with certain other assets of SAM. As a result of the Self Administration Transaction, SAM is no longer our sponsor, and the special limited partnership interest and limited partnership interest it held in our Operating Partnership through our Former External Advisor (defined below) have been redeemed. Additionally, we are now self-managed and succeed to the advisory, asset management and property management businesses and certain joint ventures previously in place for us, Strategic Storage Trust IV, Inc. (“SST IV”), a public non-traded REIT, and Strategic Storage Growth Trust II, Inc. (“SSGT II”) (collectively with SST IV, the “Managed REITs”), a private non-traded REIT, and now as a sponsor to the Managed REITs have the internal capability to originate, structure and manage additional investment products (the “Managed REIT Platform”) which would be sponsored by SmartStop REIT Advisors, LLC (“SRA”), our indirect subsidiary. As a result of the Self Administration Transaction, we indirectly own 100% of the membership interests in Strategic Storage Advisor II, LLC (our “Former External Advisor”) and each of Strategic Storage Property Management II, LLC and SS Growth Property Management, LLC (together, our “Former External Property Managers”). See Note 4, Self Administration Transaction, for additional information.
Prior to the Self Administration Transaction, our Former External Advisor was responsible for managing our affairs on a day-to-day basis and identifying and making acquisitions and investments on our behalf under the terms of an advisory agreement and our properties were previously managed by our Former External Property Managers pursuant to property management agreements. However, as a result of the Self Administration Transaction, we acquired approximately 350 self storage professionals and now perform such services on our own behalf. Please see Note 10 – Related Party Transactions.
Offering Related
Our Articles of Amendment and Restatement, as amended and supplemented, authorize 350,000,000 shares of Class A common stock, $0.001 par value per share (the “Class A Shares”) and 350,000,000 shares of Class T common stock, $0.001 par value per share (the “Class T Shares”) and 200,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.001. We offered a maximum of $1.0 billion in common shares for sale to the public (the “Primary Offering”) and $95.0 million in common shares for sale pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan (collectively, the “Offering”).
On January 10, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) declared our registration statement effective. On May 23, 2014, we satisfied the $1.5 million minimum offering requirements of our Offering and commenced formal operations. On January 9, 2017, our Offering terminated. We sold approximately 48.4 million Class A Shares and approximately 7.3 million Class T Shares for approximately $493 million and $73 million respectively, in our Offering. On November 30, 2016, prior to the termination of our Offering, we filed with the SEC a Registration Statement on Form S-3, which registered up to an additional $100.9 million in shares under our distribution reinvestment plan (our “DRP Offering”). The DRP Offering may be terminated at any time upon 10 days’ prior written notice to stockholders. As of December 31, 2019, we had sold approximately 4.0 million Class A Shares and approximately 0.6 million Class T Shares for approximately $41.7 million and $6.4 million, respectively, in our DRP Offering.
F-11
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
On October 29, 2019 (the “Commitment Date”), we entered into a preferred stock purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Extra Space Storage LP (the “Investor”), a subsidiary of Extra Space Storage Inc. (NYSE: EXR), pursuant to which the Investor committed to purchase up to $200 million in shares (the aggregate shares to be purchased, the “Preferred Shares”) of our new Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A Convertible Preferred Stock”), in one or more closings (each, a “Closing,” and collectively, the “Closings”). The initial closing (the “Initial Closing”) in the amount of $150 million occurred on the Commitment Date. The Investor has committed to purchase up to an additional $50 million, at our option, within 12 months following the Initial Closing, subject to certain limitations.
The shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock rank senior to all other shares our capital stock, including our common stock, with respect to rights to receive dividends and to participate in distributions or payments upon any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company. Dividends payable on each share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock will initially be equal to a rate of 6.25% per annum. If the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock has not been redeemed on or prior to the fifth anniversary date of the Initial Closing, the dividend rate will increase an additional 0.75% per annum each year thereafter to a maximum of 9.0% per annum until the tenth anniversary of the Initial Closing, at which time the dividend rate shall increase 0.75% per annum each year thereafter until the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock is redeemed or repurchased in full. See Note 7, Preferred Equity, for additional information.
We invested the net proceeds from our Offering primarily in self storage facilities. As of December 31, 2019, we owned 112 self storage facilities located in 17 states (Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, Texas and Washington) and Canada (the Greater Toronto Area).
On June 26, 2019, our board of directors, upon recommendation of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, approved an estimated value per share of our common stock of $10.66 for our Class A Shares and Class T Shares based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities, or net asset value, divided by the number of shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis, calculated as of March 31, 2019.
As a result of the calculation of our estimated value per share, beginning in June 2019, shares sold pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan are being sold at the estimated value per share of $10.66 for both Class A Shares and Class T Shares.
Prior to the termination of our Primary Offering, Select Capital Corporation, a California corporation (our “Dealer Manager”) was responsible for marketing our shares offered pursuant to our Primary Offering. SAM indirectly owns a 15% non-voting equity interest in our Dealer Manager. Now that our Primary Offering has terminated, our Dealer Manager no longer provides such services for us. However, we pay our Dealer Manager an ongoing stockholder servicing fee with respect to the Class T Shares sold. Please see Note 10 – Related Party Transactions – Dealer Manager Agreement.
Other Corporate History
Our Operating Partnership was formed on January 9, 2013. During 2013, our Former External Advisor purchased limited partnership interests in our Operating Partnership for $200,000 and on August 2, 2013, we contributed the initial $1,000 capital contribution we received to our Operating Partnership in exchange for the general partner interest.
As we accepted subscriptions for shares of our common stock, we transferred all of the net Offering proceeds to our Operating Partnership as capital contributions in exchange for additional units of interest in our Operating Partnership. However, we were deemed to have made capital contributions in the amount of gross proceeds received from investors, and our Operating Partnership was deemed to have simultaneously paid the sales commissions and other costs associated with the Offering. In addition, our Operating Partnership is structured to make distributions with respect to limited partnership units that are equivalent to the distributions made to holders of common stock. Finally, a limited partner in our Operating Partnership may later exchange his or her limited partnership units in our Operating Partnership for shares of our common stock at any time after one year following the date of issuance of their limited partnership units, subject to certain restrictions outlined in our Operating Partnership’s limited partnership agreement.
F-12
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Our Operating Partnership owns, directly or indirectly through one or more special purpose entities, all of the self storage properties that we acquire. As of December 31, 2019, we owned approximately 86.7% of the common units of limited partnership interests of our Operating Partnership. The remaining approximately 13.3% of the common units are owned indirectly by SAM and affiliates of our Dealer Manager. As the sole general partner of our Operating Partnership, we have the exclusive power to manage and conduct the business of our Operating Partnership. We conduct certain activities through our TRS, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of our Operating Partnership.
On October 1, 2018, we, our Operating Partnership, and SST II Growth Acquisition, LLC, our wholly-owned subsidiary (“Merger Sub”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “SSGT Merger Agreement”) with Strategic Storage Growth Trust, Inc. (“SSGT”), a non-traded REIT then sponsored by SAM, and SS Growth Operating Partnership, L.P. (“SSGT OP”). Pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, on January 24, 2019: (i) we acquired SSGT by way of a merger of SSGT with and into Merger Sub, with Merger Sub being the surviving entity (the “SSGT REIT Merger”); and (ii) immediately after the SSGT REIT Merger, SSGT OP merged with and into our Operating Partnership, with the Operating Partnership continuing as the surviving entity and remaining a subsidiary of the Company (the “SSGT Partnership Merger” and, together with the SSGT REIT Merger, the “SSGT Mergers”). SSGT was a REIT with stated investment objectives to acquire opportunistic self storage properties, including development, and lease-up properties. See Note 3, Real Estate Facilities—Merger with Strategic Storage Growth Trust, Inc., for additional information related to the SSGT Mergers.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) as contained within the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and the rules and regulations of the SEC.
Principles of Consolidation
Our financial statements, and the financial statements of our Operating Partnership, including its wholly-owned subsidiaries, are consolidated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The portion of these entities not wholly-owned by us is presented as noncontrolling interests. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Consolidation Considerations
Current accounting guidance provides a framework for identifying a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and determining when a company should include the assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests, and results of activities of a VIE in its consolidated financial statements. In general, a VIE is an entity or other legal structure used to conduct activities or hold assets that either (1) has an insufficient amount of equity to carry out its principal activities without additional subordinated financial support, (2) has a group of equity owners that are unable to make significant decisions about its activities, or (3) has a group of equity owners that do not have the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive returns generated by its operations. Generally, a VIE should be consolidated if a party with an ownership, contractual, or other financial interest in the VIE (a variable interest holder) has the power to direct the VIE’s most significant activities and the obligation to absorb losses or right to receive benefits of the VIE that could be significant to the VIE. A variable interest holder that consolidates the VIE is called the primary beneficiary. Upon consolidation, the primary beneficiary generally must initially record all of the VIE’s assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling interest at fair value and subsequently account for the VIE as if it were consolidated based on majority voting interest. Our Operating Partnership is deemed to be a VIE and is consolidated by the Company as the primary beneficiary.
As of December 31, 2019, we were not a party to any other contracts/interests that would be deemed to be variable interest in VIEs other than our Tenant Programs joint ventures with SST IV and SSGT II which were acquired in the Self Administration Transaction, which are consolidated.
F-13
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
As of December 31, 2018, we were not a party to any other contracts/interests that would be deemed to be variable interest in VIEs other than our Tenant Programs joint venture and a real estate joint venture, both of which were accounted for under the equity method of accounting. In January 2019, we sold our interest in the real estate joint venture to SST IV, a REIT previously sponsored by SAM and now sponsored by SRA. We acquired 50% of the Tenant Programs joint venture in the Self Administration Transaction such that we now own 100% of such joint venture. Please see Note 3 – Real Estate Facilities for further discussion regarding the real estate joint venture and Note 10 – Related Party Transactions for further discussions regarding our Tenant Programs joint venture. Other than these joint ventures, we did not have any variable interest relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships as of December 31, 2018.
Under the equity method, our investments in real estate joint ventures will be stated at cost and adjusted for our share of net earnings or losses and reduced by distributions. Equity in earnings will generally be recognized based on our ownership interest in the earnings of each of the unconsolidated investment.
Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Entities
We account for the noncontrolling interest in our Operating Partnership and the noncontrolling interests in our Tenant Programs joint ventures with SST IV and SSGT II in accordance with the related accounting guidance. Due to our control through our general partnership interest in our Operating Partnership and the limited rights of the limited partners, our Operating Partnership, including its wholly-owned subsidiaries, are consolidated with the Company and the limited partner interests are reflected as a noncontrolling interest in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. We also consolidate our interests in the SST IV and SSGT II Tenant Programs and present them as noncontrolling interest in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The noncontrolling interests shall be attributed their share of income and losses, even if that attribution results in a deficit noncontrolling interest balance.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The current economic environment has increased the degree of uncertainty inherent in these estimates and assumptions. Management will adjust such estimates when facts and circumstances dictate. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. The most significant estimates made include the allocation of property purchase price to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed at relative fair value, the determination if certain entities should be consolidated, the evaluation of potential impairment of indefinite and long-lived assets, and the estimated useful lives of real estate assets and intangibles.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider all short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to cash with a maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.
We may maintain cash and cash equivalents in financial institutions in excess of insured limits, but believe this risk will be mitigated by only investing in or through major financial institutions.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash consists primarily of impound reserve accounts for property taxes, insurance and capital improvements in connection with the requirements of certain of our loan agreements.
Real Estate Purchase Price Allocation
We account for acquisitions in accordance with GAAP which requires that we allocate the purchase price of a property to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values. This guidance requires us to make significant estimates and assumptions, including fair value estimates, which requires the use of significant unobservable inputs as of the acquisition date.
F-14
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
The value of the tangible assets, consisting of land and buildings is determined as if vacant. Substantially all of the leases in place at acquired properties are at market rates, as the majority of the leases are month-to-month contracts. We also consider whether in-place, market leases represent an intangible asset. We recorded approximately $13.6 million, none and approximately $4.4 million in intangible assets to recognize the value of in-place leases related to our acquisitions during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 respectively. We do not expect, nor to date have we recorded, intangible assets for the value of customer relationships because we expect we will not have concentrations of significant customers and the average customer turnover will be fairly frequent.
Allocation of purchase price to acquisitions of portfolios of facilities are allocated to the individual facilities based upon an income approach or a cash flow analysis using appropriate risk adjusted capitalization rates which take into account the relative size, age, and location of the individual facility along with current and projected occupancy and rental rate levels or appraised values, if available.
Acquisitions that do not meet the definition of a business, as defined under current GAAP, are accounted for as asset acquisitions. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, our property acquisitions have not met the definition of a business because substantially all of the fair value is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets (i.e. land, buildings, and related intangible assets) or because the acquisition does not include a substantive process in the form of an acquired workforce or an acquired contract that cannot be replaced without significant cost, effort or delay. As a result, once an acquisition is deemed probable, transaction costs are capitalized rather than expensed.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, prior to our adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business” (“ASU 2017-01”), we accounted for all real estate acquisitions as business combinations. As a result, transaction costs were expensed as acquisition costs, rather than capitalized to the purchase price allocation once the acquisition was deemed probable.
During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 we expensed approximately $0.2 million, $1.1 million, and $0.5 million respectively, of acquisition-related transaction costs that did not meet our capitalization policy during the respective periods.
Purchase Price Allocation for the Acquisition of a Business
Should the initial accounting for an acquisition that meets the definition of a business be incomplete by the end of a reporting period that falls within the measurement period, we report provisional amounts in our financial statements. During the measurement period, we adjust the provisional amounts recognized at the acquisition date to reflect new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that, if known, would have affected the measurement of the amounts recognized as of that date and we record those adjustments to our financial statements. We apply those measurement period adjustments in the period in which the provisional amounts are finalized.
As discussed in Note 4, the Self Administration Transaction is an acquisition of a business.
Evaluation of Possible Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Management monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of our long-lived assets may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment are present that indicate that the carrying amounts of the assets may not be recoverable, we will assess the recoverability of the assets by determining whether the carrying value of the long-lived assets will be recovered through the undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, we will adjust the value of the long-lived assets to the fair value and recognize an impairment loss. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, no impairment losses were recognized.
F-15
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Goodwill Valuation
We have recorded goodwill of approximately $78.4 million as a result of the Self Administration Transaction. Goodwill is recorded as the difference, if any, between the aggregate consideration paid for an acquisition and the fair value of the net tangible assets and other intangible assets acquired. Goodwill is allocated to various reporting units, as applicable and is not amortized. We perform an annual impairment test for goodwill and between annual tests, we evaluate the recoverability of goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill may not be fully recoverable. In our impairment test of goodwill, we perform a quantitative analysis to compare the fair value of each reporting unit to its respective carrying amount. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge will be recognized.
Trademarks
Trademarks are based on the value of our brands. Trademarks are valued using the relief from royalty method, which presumes that without ownership of such trademarks, we would have to make a stream of payments to a brand or franchise owner in return for the right to use their name. By virtue of this asset, we avoid any such payments and record the related intangible fair value of our ownership of the brand name. We used the following significant projections and assumptions to determine fair value under the relief from royalty method: revenues; royalty rate; tax expense; terminal growth rate; and discount rate. For the SmartStop® trademark, the projections underlying this relief from royalty model were forecasted for eight years and then a terminal value calculation was applied. For the Strategic Storage® trademark, the projections underlying the relief from royalty model were forecasted for seven years. Applying the selected pretax royalty rates to the applicable revenue base in each period yielded pretax income for each of our trademarks. These pretax totals were tax effected utilizing the applicable tax rate to arrive at net, after-tax cash flows. The net, after-tax flows were then discounted to present value utilizing an appropriate discount rate. The present value of the after-tax cash flows were then added to the present value of the amortization tax benefit (considering the 15-year amortization of intangible assets pursuant to U.S. tax legislation) to arrive at the recommended fair values for the trademarks.
We will evaluate whether any triggering events or changes in circumstances have occurred subsequent to our annual impairment test that would indicate an impairment condition may exist. If any change in circumstance or triggering event occurs, and results in a significant impact to our revenue and profitability projections, or any significant assumption in our valuations methods is adversely impacted, the impact could result in a material impairment charge in the future.
In connection with the Self Administration Transaction, we recorded $19.8 million associated with the two primary trademarks acquired. Prior thereto we had no amounts recorded related to trademarks.
Approximately $18.7 million of the original $19.8 million of trademarks relates to the “SmartStop®” trademark, which is an indefinite-lived intangible. The remaining approximately $1.1 million relates to our “Strategic Storage®” trademark and will be amortized over a five year period. As of December 31, 2019, we had accumulated amortization of approximately $0.1 million associated with the “Strategic Storage®” trademark.
The total estimated future amortization expense of the “Strategic Storage®” trademark asset for the years ending December 31, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 and thereafter is approximately $220,000, $220,000, $220,000, $220,000 and $108,000, respectively
Revenue Recognition
Self Storage Operations
Management believes that all of our leases are operating leases. Rental income is recognized in accordance with the terms of the leases, which generally are month-to-month. Revenues from any long-term operating leases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The excess of rents received over amounts contractually due pursuant to the underlying leases is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets and contractually due but unpaid rent is included in other assets.
F-16
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Managed REIT Platform
We earn property management revenue and asset management revenue, pursuant to the respective property management and advisory agreement contracts, in connection with providing services to the Managed REITs. We have determined under ASC 606 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”), that the performance obligation for the property management services and asset management services are satisfied as the services are rendered. While we are compensated for our services on a monthly basis, these services represent a series of distinct daily services in accordance with ASC 606. Such revenue is recorded in the Managed REIT Platform revenue line within our consolidated statements of operations.
The Managed REITs’ advisory agreements also provide for reimbursement to us of our direct and indirect costs of providing administrative and management services to the Managed REITs. These reimbursements include costs incurred in relation to organization and offering services provided to the Managed REITs and the reimbursement of salaries, bonuses, and other expenses related to benefits paid to our employees while performing services for the Managed REITs. The Managed REITs’ property management agreements also provide reimbursement to us for the property manager’s costs of managing the properties. Reimbursable costs include wages and salaries and other expenses that arise in operating, managing and maintaining the Managed REITs’ properties.
Under ASC 606, direct reimbursement of such costs does not represent a separate performance obligation from our obligation to perform property management and asset management services. The reimbursement income is considered variable consideration, and is recognized as the costs are incurred, subject to limitations on the Managed REIT Platform’s ability to incur offering costs or limitations imposed by the advisory agreements. We have elected to separately record such revenue in the Reimbursable costs from Managed REITs line within our consolidated statements of operations.
Additionally, we earn revenue in connection with our Tenant Programs joint ventures with our Managed REITs. We also earn development and construction management revenue from services we provide in connection with the project design, coordination and oversite of development and certain capital improvement projects undertaken by the Managed REITs. We recognize such revenue in the Managed REIT Platform revenue line within our consolidated statements of operations. See Note 10 – Related Party Transactions, for additional information regarding revenue generated from our Managed REIT Platform.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Tenant accounts receivable is reported net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Management records a general reserve estimate based upon a review of the current status of tenant accounts receivable. It is reasonably possible that management’s estimate of the allowance will change in the future.
Real Estate Facilities
Real estate facilities are recorded based on the relative fair value as of the date of acquisition. We capitalize costs incurred to develop, construct, renovate and improve properties, including interest and property taxes incurred during the construction period. The construction period begins when expenditures for the real estate assets have been made and activities that are necessary to prepare the asset for its intended use are in progress. The construction period ends when the asset is substantially complete and ready for its intended use.
Depreciation of Real Property Assets
Our management is required to make subjective assessments as to the useful lives of our depreciable assets. We consider the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives.
F-17
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Depreciation of our real property assets is charged to expense on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives
as follows:
Description |
|
Standard Depreciable Life |
Land |
|
Not Depreciated |
Buildings |
|
|
Site Improvements |
|
|
Depreciation of Personal Property Assets
Personal property assets consist primarily of furniture, fixtures and equipment and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives generally ranging from 3 to 5 years, and are included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets.
Intangible Assets
We have allocated a portion of our real estate purchase price to in-place lease intangibles. We are amortizing in-place lease intangibles on a straight-line basis over the estimated future benefit period. As of December 31, 2019, the gross amount allocated to in-place lease intangibles was approximately $46.8 million and accumulated amortization of in-place lease intangibles totaled approximately $40.4 million. As of December 31, 2018, the gross amount allocated to in-place lease intangibles was approximately $33.4 million and accumulated amortization of in-place lease intangibles totaled approximately $31.9 million.
The total estimated future amortization expense of intangible assets related to our self storage properties for the years ending December 31, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, and thereafter is approximately $5.0 million, $0.1 million, $0.1 million, $0.1 million, $0.1 million, and $1.0 million respectively.
In connection with the Self Administration Transaction, we allocated a portion of the consideration to the contracts that we acquired related to the Managed REITs and the customer relationships related to the Tenant Programs joint ventures. For these intangibles, we are amortizing such amounts on a straight-line basis over the estimated benefit period of the contracts and customer relationships. As of December 31, 2019, the gross amount allocated to the contracts and customer relationships was approximately $26.5 million and the accumulated amortization was approximately $2.9 million.
The total estimated future amortization expense for such intangible assets for the years ending December 31, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and thereafter is approximately $5.7 million, $4.6 million, $4.6 million, $4.6 million, and $4.1 million, respectively.
Debt Issuance Costs
The net carrying value of costs incurred in connection with our former revolving credit facility was presented as debt issuance costs on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, accumulated amortization of debt issuance costs related to our revolving credit facility totaled none and approximately $45,000, respectively.
The net carrying value of costs incurred in connection with obtaining non revolving debt are presented on the balance sheet as a deduction from debt (see Note 6). Debt issuance costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related loan, which is not materially different than the effective interest method. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, accumulated amortization of debt issuance costs related to non-revolving debt totaled approximately $4.3 million and $1.0 million, respectively.
F-18
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Organizational and Offering Costs
We pay our Dealer Manager an ongoing stockholder servicing fee that is payable monthly and accrues daily in an amount equal to 1/365th of 1% of the purchase price per share of the Class T Shares sold in the Primary Offering. We will cease paying the stockholder servicing fee with respect to the Class T Shares sold in the Primary Offering at the earlier of (i) the date we list our shares on a national securities exchange, merge or consolidate with or into another entity, or sell or dispose of all or substantially all of our assets, (ii) the date at which the aggregate underwriting compensation from all sources equals 10% of the gross proceeds from the sale of both Class A Shares and Class T Shares in our Primary Offering (i.e., excluding proceeds from sales pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan), which calculation shall be made by us with the assistance of our Dealer Manager commencing after the termination of the Primary Offering; (iii) the fifth anniversary of the last day of the fiscal quarter in which our Primary Offering (i.e., excluding our distribution reinvestment plan offering) terminated; and (iv) the date that such Class T Share is redeemed or is no longer outstanding. Our Dealer Manager entered into participating dealer agreements with certain other broker-dealers which authorized them to sell our shares. Upon sale of our shares by such broker-dealers, our Dealer Manager re-allowed all of the sales commissions and, subject to certain limitations, the stockholder servicing fees paid in connection with sales made by these broker-dealers. Our Dealer Manager was also permitted to re-allow to these broker-dealers a portion of their dealer manager fee as marketing fees, reimbursement of certain costs and expenses of attending training and education meetings sponsored by our Dealer Manager, payment of attendance fees required for employees of our Dealer Manager or other affiliates to attend retail seminars and public seminars sponsored by these broker-dealers, or to defray other distribution-related expenses. Our Dealer Manager also received reimbursement of bona fide due diligence expenses; however, to the extent the due diligence expenses could not be justified, any excess over actual due diligence expenses would have been considered underwriting compensation subject to a 10% FINRA limitation and, when aggregated with all other non-accountable expenses in connection with our Public Offering, could not exceed 3% of gross offering proceeds from sales in the Public Offering. We recorded a liability within Due to affiliates for the future estimated stockholder servicing fees at the time of sale of Class T Shares as an offering cost.
Foreign Currency Translation
For non-U.S. functional currency operations, assets and liabilities are translated to U.S. dollars at current exchange rates. Revenues and expenses are translated at the average rates for the period. All adjustments related to amounts classified as long term net equity investments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as a separate component of equity. Transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the related operation are recorded at rates of exchange in effect at the date of the transaction. Changes in net equity investments not classified as long term are recorded in other income (expense) and represented a gain and a loss of approximately $0.9 million and approximately ($1.2 million) for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Redeemable Common Stock
We adopted a share redemption program that enables stockholders to sell their shares to us in limited circumstances.
We record amounts that are redeemable under the share redemption program as redeemable common stock in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets since the shares are redeemable at the option of the holder and therefore their redemption is outside our control. The maximum amount redeemable under our share redemption program is limited to the number of shares we can repurchase with the amount of the net proceeds from the sale of shares under the distribution reinvestment plan. However, accounting guidance states that determinable amounts that can become redeemable should be presented as redeemable when such amount is known. Therefore, the net proceeds from the distribution reinvestment plan are considered to be temporary equity and are presented as redeemable common stock in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
In addition, current accounting guidance requires, among other things, that financial instruments that represent a mandatory obligation of us to repurchase shares be classified as liabilities and reported at settlement value. On August 26, 2019, our board of directors approved the suspension of our share redemption program, effective as of September 27, 2019, so that common shares are redeemable at the option of the holder only in connection with (i) death or disability of a stockholder, (ii) confinement to a long-term care facility, or (iii) other exigent circumstances. When we determine we have a mandatory obligation to repurchase shares under the share redemption program, we reclassify such obligations from temporary equity to a liability based upon their respective settlement values.
F-19
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
For the year ended December 31, 2019, we received redemption requests totaling approximately $4.9 million (approximately 0.5 million shares), approximately $4.5 million of which were fulfilled during the year ended December 31, 2019, with the remaining approximately $0.4 million included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2019 and fulfilled in January 2020. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we received redemption requests totaling approximately $8.3 million (approximately 0.9 million shares), approximately $7.0 million of which were fulfilled during the year ended December 31, 2018, with the remaining approximately $1.3 million included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2018 and fulfilled in January 2019. For the year ended December 31, 2017 we received redemption requests totaling approximately $2.2 million, (approximately 0.2 million shares), approximately $1.5 million of which were fulfilled during the year ended December 31, 2017, with the remaining approximately $0.7 million included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2017 and fulfilled in January 2018.
Accounting for Equity Awards
Through December 31, 2019, we have only issued service based awards. The cost of such restricted stock awards is required to be measured based on the grant date fair value and the cost recognized over the relevant service period. We have assumed no forfeitures in recognizing these costs; any such forfeitures will be recognized upon occurrence and will reduce the previously recognized expenses.
Fair Value Measurements
Under GAAP, we are required to measure certain financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis. In addition, we are required to measure other financial instruments and balances at fair value on a non-recurring basis. Fair value is defined by the accounting standard for fair value measurements and disclosures as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. It also establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three levels. The following summarizes the three levels of inputs and hierarchy of fair value we use when measuring fair value:
|
• |
Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access; |
|
• |
Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals; and |
|
• |
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the assets or liabilities that are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions as there is little, if any, related market activity. |
In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the fair value measurement will fall within the lowest level that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
The accounting guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures provides a framework for measuring fair value and establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. In determining fair value, we will utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible as well as consider counterparty credit risk in our assessment of fair value. Considerable judgment will be necessary to interpret Level 2 and 3 inputs in determining fair value of our financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the fair values we will present will be indicative of amounts that may ultimately be realized upon sale or other disposition of these assets.
Financial and non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in our consolidated financial statements consist of real estate and related liabilities assumed related to our acquisitions along with the assets and liabilities described in Note 4, Self Administration Transaction. The fair values of these assets and liabilities were determined as of the acquisition dates using widely accepted valuation techniques, including (i) discounted cash flow analysis, which considers, among other things, leasing assumptions, growth rates, discount rates and terminal capitalization rates, (ii) income capitalization approach, which considers prevailing market capitalization rates, and (iii) comparable sales activity. In general, we consider multiple valuation techniques when measuring fair values. However, in certain circumstances, a single valuation technique may be appropriate. All of the fair values of the assets and liabilities as of the acquisition dates were derived using Level 3 inputs.
F-20
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, other assets, variable-rate debt, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, distributions payable and amounts due to affiliates approximate fair value.
The table below summarizes our fixed rate notes payable at December 31, 2019 and 2018. The estimated fair value of financial instruments is subjective in nature and is dependent on a number of important assumptions, including discount rates and relevant comparable market information associated with each financial instrument. The fair value of the fixed rate notes payable was estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. The use of different market assumptions and estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the reported estimated fair value amounts. Accordingly, the estimates presented below are not necessarily indicative of the amounts we would realize in a current market exchange.
|
|
December 31, 2019 |
|
|
December 31, 2018 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
||||
Fixed Rate Secured Debt |
|
$ |
311,700,000 |
|
|
$ |
302,820,786 |
|
|
$ |
200,600,000 |
|
|
$ |
207,357,391 |
|
As of December 31, 2019, and 2018, we had interest rate swaps, interest rate caps, and a net investment hedge (See Notes 6 and 8). The valuations of these instruments were determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of the derivative. The analysis reflected the contractual terms of the derivative, including the period to maturity, and used observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves, foreign exchange rates, and implied volatilities. The fair value of the interest rate swaps were determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash payments and the discounted expected variable cash payments. Our fair values of our net investment hedges are based on the change in the spot rate at the end of the period as compared with the strike price at inception.
To comply with GAAP, we incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of derivative contracts for the effect of non-performance risk, we will consider the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.
Although we had determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives were within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with our derivatives utilized Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by us and our counterparties. However, through December 31, 2019, we had assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of our derivative positions and determined that the credit valuation adjustments were not significant to the overall valuation of our derivatives. As a result, we determined that our derivative valuations in their entirety were classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
We record all derivatives on our balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether we have elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Derivatives may also be designated as hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation. We may enter into derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge certain of our risks, even though hedge accounting does not apply or we elect not to apply hedge accounting.
For derivatives designated as net investment hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivatives are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. Amounts are reclassified out of other comprehensive (loss) income into earnings (loss) when the hedged net investment is either sold or substantially liquidated.
F-21
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Income Taxes
We made an election to be taxed as a Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”), under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2014. To qualify as a REIT, we must continue to meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of the REIT’s ordinary taxable income to stockholders (which is computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction or net capital gains and which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP). As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that we distribute to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will then be subject to federal income taxes on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost unless the IRS grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect our net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, we believe that we are organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT and intend to operate in the foreseeable future in such a manner that we will remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.
Even if we continue to qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state and local taxes on our income and property, and federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed income.
We filed an election to treat our TRS as a taxable REIT subsidiary effective January 1, 2014. In general, the TRS performs additional services for our customers and provides the advisory and property management services to the Managed REITs and otherwise generally engages in any real estate or non-real estate related business. The TRS is subject to corporate federal and state income tax. The TRS follows accounting guidance which requires the use of the asset and liability method. Deferred income taxes represent the tax effect of future differences between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities.
Segment Reporting
Our business is comprised of two reportable segments: (i) self storage operations and (ii) the Managed REIT Platform business. Please see Note 9 – Segment Disclosures for additional detail.
Convertible Preferred Stock
We classify our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock on our balance sheets using the guidance in ASC 480‑10‑S99. Our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock can be redeemed by us on or after the fifth anniversary of its issuance, or if certain events occur, such as the listing of our common stock on a national securities exchange, a change in control, or if a redemption would be required to maintain our REIT status. Additionally, if we do not maintain our REIT status the holder can require redemption. As the shares are contingently redeemable, and under certain circumstances not solely within our control, we have classified our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock as temporary equity.
We have analyzed whether the conversion features in our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock should be bifurcated under the guidance in ASC 815‑10 and have determined that bifurcation is not necessary.
Per Share Data
Basic earnings per share attributable to our common stockholders for all periods presented are computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to our common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding unvested restricted stock. Diluted earnings per share is computed by including the dilutive effect of the conversion of all potential common stock equivalents (which includes unvested restricted stock and convertible preferred stock) and the adding back of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock dividends. For all periods presented, the dilutive effect of convertible preferred stock and unvested restricted stock was not included in the diluted weighted average shares as such impact was antidilutive.
F-22
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Recently Issued Accounting Guidance
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” ASU 2016-02 amends the guidance on accounting for leases. Under ASU 2016-02, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short term leases) at the commencement date: (1) a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease; and (2) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Under ASU 2016-02, lessor accounting is largely unchanged. It also includes extensive amendments to the disclosure requirements. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. We adopted this standard and all related amendments on January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective approach, without applying the provisions to comparative periods presented. Its adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements as substantially all of our lease revenues are derived from month-to-month leases and, as lessee, we have no significant leases. In addition, the new standard requires our expected loss related to collectability of rental payments, previously reflected in property operating expenses as bad debt expense, to be reflected as a reduction to self storage rental revenue. The impact of this was a reduction in both self storage rental revenue and property operating expenses of approximately $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, bad debt expense totaled approximately $1.2 million and $1.3 million, respectively, and are included in property operating expenses.
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities”. ASU 2017-12 is intended to improve the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements and to simplify the application of the hedge accounting guidance under previous GAAP. ASU 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. For cash flow and net investment hedges existing at the date of adoption, a reporting entity must apply the amendments in ASU 2017-12 using the modified retrospective approach by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Company adopted ASU 2017-12 effective beginning January 1, 2019, and its adoption did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment”. The standard simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by removing the requirement to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to compute the implied fair value of goodwill to measure impairment. Instead, goodwill impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value and the carrying value, as applicable. This standard is effective for annual or any interim goodwill impairment test in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for impairment tests performed after January 1, 2017. The Company has early adopted ASU 2017-04 effective beginning January 1, 2019.
F-23
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Note 3. Real Estate Facilities
The following summarizes the activity in real estate facilities during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
Real estate facilities |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2017 |
|
$ |
829,679,477 |
|
Impact of foreign exchange rate changes |
|
|
(11,915,703 |
) |
Improvements and additions |
|
|
2,532,252 |
|
Balance at December 31, 2018 |
|
|
820,296,026 |
|
Facilities acquired through merger with SSGT |
|
|
334,139,296 |
|
Asset disposals |
|
|
(11,688,993 |
) |
Corporate office acquired through Self Administration Transaction |
|
|
6,500,000 |
|
Other facility acquisitions |
|
|
10,430,942 |
|
Impact of foreign exchange rate changes |
|
|
6,582,603 |
|
Improvements and additions |
|
|
7,565,494 |
|
Balance at December 31, 2019 |
|
$ |
1,173,825,368 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2017 |
|
$ |
(34,686,973 |
) |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
(20,134,068 |
) |
Impact of foreign exchange rate changes |
|
|
556,356 |
|
Balance at December 31, 2018 |
|
|
(54,264,685 |
) |
Asset disposals |
|
|
202,416 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
(29,188,668 |
) |
Impact of foreign exchange rate changes |
|
|
(441,554 |
) |
Balance at December 31, 2019 |
|
$ |
(83,692,491 |
) |
Merger with Strategic Storage Growth Trust, Inc.
On October 1, 2018, we, our Operating Partnership, and SST II Growth Acquisition, LLC, our wholly-owned subsidiary (“Merger Sub”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “SSGT Merger Agreement”) with Strategic Storage Growth Trust, Inc. (“SSGT”), a non-traded REIT then sponsored by SAM, and SS Growth Operating Partnership, L.P. (“SSGT OP”). Pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the SSGT Merger Agreement, on January 24, 2019: (i) we acquired SSGT by way of a merger of SSGT with and into Merger Sub, with Merger Sub being the surviving entity (the “SSGT REIT Merger”); and (ii) immediately after the SSGT REIT Merger, SSGT OP merged with and into our Operating Partnership, with the Operating Partnership continuing as the surviving entity and remaining a subsidiary of the Company (the “SSGT Partnership Merger” and, together with the SSGT REIT Merger, the “SSGT Mergers”).
At the effective time of the SSGT REIT Merger (the “SSGT REIT Merger Effective Time”), each share of SSGT common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “SSGT Common Stock”), outstanding immediately prior to the SSGT REIT Merger Effective Time (other than shares owned by SSGT and its subsidiaries or us and our subsidiaries) was automatically converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to $12.00, without interest and less any applicable withholding taxes. The proceeds used to fund the SSGT Mergers and the repayment of approximately $141 million of our outstanding debt were funded by the SSGT Merger Financings, totaling approximately $500 million, as described in Note 6.
Immediately prior to the SSGT REIT Merger Effective Time, all shares of SSGT Common Stock that were subject to vesting and other restrictions also became fully vested and converted into the right to receive cash equal to $12.00 per share upon the SSGT REIT Merger.
At the effective time of the SSGT Partnership Merger, each outstanding unit of partnership interest in SSGT OP was converted automatically into 1.127 units of partnership interest in our Operating Partnership, which resulted in approximately 396,000 Class A Units of our Operating Partnership being issued to SS Growth Advisor, LLC, a subsidiary of SAM.
F-24
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
SSGT was a REIT with stated investment objectives to acquire opportunistic self storage properties, including development, and lease-up properties. As a result of the SSGT Mergers, we acquired all of the real estate owned by SSGT, consisting of 28 operating self storage facilities located in 10 states and in the Greater Toronto, Canada area, and one development property in the Greater Toronto Area. Additionally, we obtained the rights to acquire a self storage facility which was under development located in Gilbert, Arizona that was previously under contract with SSGT and was acquired by us in July 2019.
The following table reconciles the total consideration transferred during the SSGT Mergers:
Fair value of consideration transferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
346,231,561 |
|
(1) |
Issuance of limited partnership units in our Operating Partnership to SS Growth Advisor, LLC |
|
|
4,217,399 |
|
|
Total consideration transferred |
|
$ |
350,448,960 |
|
|
(1) |
The approximately $346 million cash consideration consisted of approximately $320 million paid to the SSGT shareholders, approximately $19 million of SSGT debt that was repaid at closing, approximately $5 million of other SSGT liabilities paid at closing, and approximately $1 million in transaction costs. |
The following table summarizes the relative fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the SSGT Mergers:
Assets Acquired: |
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
62,261,573 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
255,743,767 |
|
Site improvements |
|
|
16,133,956 |
|
Construction in process |
|
|
5,370,773 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
13,571,765 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
692,965 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
6,536,838 |
|
Total assets acquired |
|
$ |
360,311,637 |
|
Liabilities assumed: |
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
$ |
5,038,435 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
4,824,242 |
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
$ |
9,862,677 |
|
Total net assets acquired |
|
$ |
350,448,960 |
|
Acquisition of Property Located in Gilbert, Arizona
On January 24, 2019, we, by way of the SSGT Mergers, obtained the rights to acquire a property that was being developed into a self storage facility located in Gilbert, Arizona (the “Gilbert Property”). On July 11, 2019, upon issuance of the certificate of occupancy, we acquired the Gilbert Property for a purchase price of $10 million, plus closing costs and acquisition fees. Pursuant to the Contribution Agreement (as defined in Note 4), an acquisition fee of $175,000 was paid to SAM. We funded such acquisition through a $4.3 million draw on the Senior Term Loan and an approximate $5.7 million draw on the Secured Loan.
The following table summarizes our purchase price allocation for our acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2019:
Acquisition |
|
Acquisition Date |
|
Real Estate Assets |
|
|
Construction in Process(4) |
|
|
Intangibles |
|
|
Total(1) |
|
|
Debt Issued or Assumed |
|
|
2019 Revenue(2) |
|
|
2019 Property Operating Income(2)(3) |
|
|||||||
SSGT Mergers(5) |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
$ |
334,139,296 |
|
|
$ |
5,370,773 |
|
|
$ |
13,571,765 |
|
|
$ |
353,081,834 |
|
|
$ |
193,376,846 |
|
|
$ |
21,909,300 |
|
|
$ |
12,032,555 |
|
Riggs Rd - Gilbert(6) |
|
7/11/2019 |
|
|
10,430,942 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
10,430,942 |
|
|
|
5,702,000 |
|
|
|
62,085 |
|
|
|
(44,459 |
) |
2019 Total |
|
|
|
$ |
344,570,238 |
|
|
$ |
5,370,773 |
|
|
$ |
13,571,765 |
|
|
$ |
363,512,776 |
|
|
$ |
199,078,846 |
|
|
$ |
21,971,385 |
|
|
$ |
11,988,096 |
|
F-25
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
(1) |
The allocations noted above are based on a determination of the relative fair value of the total consideration provided and represent the amount paid including capitalized acquisition costs. |
(2) |
The operating results of the self storage properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2019 have been included in our consolidated statements of operations since their respective acquisition date. |
(3) |
Property operating income excludes corporate general and administrative expenses, asset management fees, interest expenses, depreciation, amortization and acquisition expenses. |
(4) |
Construction in process relates to the Torbarrie property in Toronto, Canada, which is a self storage property under construction. Such facility partially opened in March 2020. |
(5) |
SSGT had stated investment objectives to acquire opportunistic self storage properties, including development, and lease-up properties. As a result, many of its properties were not physically and/or economically stabilized as of the date of the SSGT Mergers. |
(6) |
The Gilbert Property was recently developed and acquired, with 0% occupancy as of its acquisition date. |
Sale of San Antonio II Property
The San Antonio II Property was acquired by us in the SSGT Mergers. Given pending capital improvement requirements and a higher and better use for the property, we executed a purchase and sale agreement with an unaffiliated third party to sell the San Antonio II Property for approximately $16.1 million, less closing costs. The San Antonio II Property sale was completed on October 18, 2019 and we recorded a gain on sale of real estate of approximately $3.9 million in our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2019. With the proceeds, we paid off approximately $9.9 million of the Secured Loan, and approximately $5.4 million of the Senior Term Loan. See Note 6, Debt, for more information on such loans.
Joint Venture with SmartCentres
In January 2018, SAM, through two of its subsidiaries, entered into a joint venture framework agreement with a subsidiary of SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust, an unaffiliated third party (“SmartCentres”), pursuant to which the parties agreed that SmartCentres would develop and construct certain properties located in Canada and identified as joint venture sites, and SAM would operate the self storage business located at such properties utilizing the “SmartStop” brand (the “SmartCentres Joint Venture”). The SmartCentres Joint Venture properties would be co-owned by a limited partnership in which each of SmartCentres and SAM (or their respective affiliates) were each 50% limited partners and equal ranking general partners. In connection with the Self Administration Transaction, we acquired the SAM subsidiaries that are a party to the SmartCentres Joint Venture. As of December 31, 2019, all properties subject to the SmartCentres Joint Venture have been placed into SST IV or SSGT II as the 50% partner with SmartCentres.
In January 2018, a subsidiary of SAM entered into a contribution agreement (the “SmartCentres Contribution Agreement”) with a subsidiary of SmartCentres for a tract of land owned by SmartCentres and located in East York, Ontario (the “East York Lot”) in Canada. In March 2018, the interest in the SmartCentres Contribution Agreement was assigned to one of our subsidiaries.
On June 28, 2018, we closed on the East York Lot, which is owned by a limited partnership (the “Limited Partnership”), in which we (through our subsidiary) and SmartCentres (through its subsidiary) were each a 50% limited partner and each had an equal ranking general partner in the Limited Partnership. At closing, we subscribed for 50% of the units in the Limited Partnership at an agreed upon subscription price of approximately $3.8 million CAD, representing a contribution equivalent to 50% of the agreed upon fair market value of the land. The Limited Partnership intends to develop a self storage facility on the East York Lot. The value of the land contributed to the Limited Partnership had an agreed upon fair market value of approximately $7.6 million CAD. In January 2019, we sold our interest in the Limited Partnership to SST IV for approximately $4.7 million CAD, which represented our total cost incurred related to the Limited Partnership. Of this amount, approximately $4.6 million CAD related to the acquisition of land and development costs incurred, and approximately $100,000 CAD related to acquisition costs that were expensed during 2018, which were recorded in other income (expense) in the consolidated statement of operations for year ended December 31, 2019.
F-26
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Note 4. Self Administration Transaction
Overview
On June 28, 2019, we, our Operating Partnership and our TRS entered into a series of transactions, agreements, and amendments to our existing agreements and arrangements with our then-sponsor SAM and SS OP Holdings, a subsidiary of SAM, pursuant to which, effective June 28, 2019, we acquired the self storage advisory, asset management and property management businesses and certain joint venture interests of SAM, along with certain other assets of SAM. As a result of the Self Administration Transaction, SAM is no longer our sponsor, and we are now self-managed and succeed to the advisory, asset management and property management businesses and certain joint ventures previously in place for us, SST IV, SSGT II and we now have the internal capability to originate, structure and manage additional investment products which would be sponsored by SRA. The Self Administration Transaction and the other transactions discussed herein were approved by our board of directors at the recommendation of a special committee of our board of directors comprised solely of independent directors.
Agreements
Contribution Agreement
On June 28, 2019, we along with our Operating Partnership, as contributee, and SAM and SS OP Holdings, as contributor, entered into a Contribution Agreement (the “Contribution Agreement”) whereby the Operating Partnership acquired the Self Storage Platform and certain other assets, including (a) SAM’s, or its subsidiaries’, 100% membership interests in our Former External Advisor and Former External Property Managers, the advisor and property manager for SST IV, the advisor and property manager for SSGT II, entities related to the Tenant Programs joint ventures, and certain entities related to SAM’s self storage business in Canada; (b) all equipment, furnishings, fixtures and computer equipment as set forth in the Contribution Agreement; (c) certain personal property as set forth in the Contribution Agreement; (d) all intellectual property, goodwill, licenses and sublicenses granted and obtained with respect thereto (including all rights to the “SmartStop®” brand and “Strategic Storage®” related trademarks), (e) SAM’s processes, practices, procedures and workforce related to the self storage business (then consisting of a total of approximately 350 on-site self storage employees, regional and district managers, other personnel and the then current executive management team of the Company), and (f) certain other assets as set forth in the Contribution Agreement, in exchange for $769,126 in cash, assumption of existing debt in the amount of $15 million, and 8,698,956 Class A-1 limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership (“Class A-1 Units”) and 3,283,302 Class A-2 limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership (“Class A-2 Units”). For a description of the Class A-1 Units and Class A-2 Units, see below under the heading “Third Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement and Redemption of Limited Partner Interest Agreement.”
The Contribution Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, covenants, agreements and indemnification obligations and rights of us, the Operating Partnership, SAM and SS OP Holdings.
Third Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement and Redemption of Limited Partner Interest Agreement
On June 28, 2019, we entered into the Third Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of the Operating Partnership, (the “Operating Partnership Agreement”), which amended and superseded the Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement (the “Former OP Agreement”), and a Redemption of Limited Partner Interest Agreement (the “Redemption of Limited Partner Interest Agreement”) with the Former External Advisor and the Operating Partnership, pursuant to which the Operating Partnership redeemed all of the limited partnership interests held by the Former External Advisor in the Operating Partnership. As a result of the Redemption of Limited Partner Interest Agreement and the Self Administration Transaction, the Former External Advisor’s parent entity, SAM and its affiliates no longer hold either their previously existing 20,000 limited partnership units or their special limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership; however, SAM received cash of $200,000 and also now holds Class A-1 Units and Class A-2 Units in the Operating Partnership, as further described below.
As a result of the entry into the above-described Redemption of Limited Partner Interest Agreement and the Operating Partnership Agreement (1) references to the limited partner interests previously held by the Former External Advisor in the Operating Partnership have been removed from the Operating Partnership Agreement in connection with the redemption of such interests pursuant to the Redemption of Limited Partner Interest Agreement and (2) provisions related to the subordinated incentive distributions payable to the Former External Advisor pursuant to the special limited partnership interests have been removed from the Operating Partnership Agreement. Accordingly, we and our Operating Partnership will no longer have any obligation to make the Subordinated Share of Net Sale Proceeds, Subordinated Distribution Due Upon Termination of Advisory Agreement, Subordinated Incentive Listing Distribution, or Subordinated Distribution Due Upon Extraordinary Transaction (each as defined in the Former OP Agreement).
F-27
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
In addition, the revised Operating Partnership Agreement created two new classes of units issued to SS OP Holdings in connection with the Self Administration Transaction: Class A-1 Units and Class A-2 Units.
The Class A-1 Units are subject to the general restrictions on transfer contained in the Operating Partnership Agreement. In addition, until June 28, 2021 (the “Lock-Up Expiration”), the Class A-1 Units may not be sold, pledged, or otherwise transferred or encumbered except in certain limited circumstances set forth in the Contribution Agreement. The Class A-1 Units are otherwise entitled to all rights and duties of the Class A limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership, including cash distributions and the allocation of any profits or losses in the Operating Partnership. The Class A-2 Units may convert into Class A-1 Units as earnout consideration, as described below. The Class A-2 Units are not entitled to cash distributions or the allocation of any profits or losses in the Operating Partnership until the Class A-2 Units are converted into Class A-1 Units.
The conversion features of the Class A-2 Units are as follows: (A) the first time the aggregate incremental assets under management (“AUM”) (as defined in the Operating Partnership Agreement) of the Operating Partnership equals or exceeds $300,000,000, one-third of the Class A-2 Units will automatically convert into Class A-1 Units, (B) the first time the incremental AUM of the Operating Partnership equals or exceeds $500,000,000, an additional one-third of the Class A-2 Units will automatically convert into Class A-1 Units, and (C) the first time the incremental AUM equals or exceeds $700,000,000, the remaining one-third of the Class A-2 Units will automatically convert into Class A-1 Units (each an “Earnout Achievement Date”). On each Earnout Achievement Date, the Class A-2 Units will automatically convert into Class A-1 Units based on an earnout unit exchange ratio, which is equal to $10.66 divided by the then current value of our Class A common stock. The Class A-2 Units conversion rights will expire seven years following the closing date of the Self Administration Transaction. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the earnout consideration will be earned and automatically convert in the event of an “Earnout Acceleration Event” (as defined in the Operating Partnership Agreement), which includes each of the following: certain change of control events (as described in the Operating Partnership Agreement), or H. Michael Schwartz being removed either as a member of our board of directors or as one of our executive officers for any reason other than for cause.
The Operating Partnership Agreement also provides the Class A-1 unitholders a vote on “Extraordinary Matters” which includes any merger, sale of all or substantially all of our assets, share exchange, conversion, dissolution or amendment of our charter, in each case where the vote of our stockholders is required under Maryland law (the “OP Consent”). The OP Consent will be determined by a vote of the partners of the Operating Partnership, with our vote, as General Partner of the Operating Partnership, being voted in proportion to the votes cast by our stockholders on the Extraordinary Matter.
The Redemption of Limited Partner Interest Agreement contained various customary representations and warranties.
Membership Interest Purchase Agreement – Ladera Office
On June 28, 2019, immediately following the Self Administration Transaction, SAM and its then wholly-owned subsidiary, 10 Terrace Rd, LLC (“10 Terrace Rd”), and SmartStop Storage Advisors, LLC (“SSA”), our indirect subsidiary, entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the “Membership Interest Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which SSA purchased 100% of the membership interests in 10 Terrace Rd for $6.5 million, payable through the assumption of existing debt in the amount of approximately $4.2 million, and cash in the amount of approximately $2.3 million. 10 Terrace Rd is the owner of an office condominium located at 10 Terrace Rd., Ladera Ranch, California (the “Ladera Office”) which, as a result of the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, we now indirectly own. The Ladera Office houses our corporate headquarters.
Fair Value of Consideration Transferred
We accounted for the Contribution Agreement and Membership Interest Purchase Agreement discussed above as a business combination under the acquisition method of accounting. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we incurred approximately $1.6 million for legal fees and fees and expenses of our other professional and financial advisors related to the Self Administration Transaction, which are included in the self administration transaction expenses line-item in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
F-28
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
The estimated fair value of the consideration transferred totaled approximately $111.3 million and consisted of the following:
Estimated Fair Value of Consideration Transferred |
|
|
|
|
Cash(1) |
|
$ |
3,918,185 |
|
Class A-1 Units |
|
|
63,643,000 |
|
Class A-2 Units (contingent earnout) |
|
|
30,900,000 |
|
Total Consideration Transferred |
|
|
98,461,185 |
|
Fair value of our preexisting 50% equity interests |
|
|
12,800,000 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
111,261,185 |
|
(1) |
We assumed a net asset of approximately $0.5 million, which per the Contribution Agreement we were required to pay to SAM the value thereof and such amount was included above as cash consideration. |
As a result of this acquisition, we remeasured the book value of our preexisting 50% equity method investments in our Tenant Programs joint ventures to fair value, which resulted in a gain of approximately $8.0 million which was presented in the gain resulting from acquisition of unconsolidated affiliates line-item in our consolidated statements of operations. The fair values of the Tenant Programs joint ventures were determined based on a discounted cash flow valuation of the projected cash flows.
The estimated fair value of the Class A-1 Units issued was determined using the Company’s net asset value, which was based on an income approach to value the properties and the valuation of the assets acquired in the Self Administration Transaction, as described herein, adjusted for market related adjustments and illiquidity discounts.
These fair value measurements are based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represent a Level 3 measurement as discussed in Note 2. The key assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the Class A-1 Units and Class A-2 Units consideration included (i) a marketability discount of 5%, (ii) a capitalization rate of 5.16% and (iii) annual net operating income.
The estimated fair value of the contingent earnout, Class A-2 Units, was determined using the net asset value calculation described above and further adjusted based on a discounted probability weighted forecast of achieving the requisite AUM thresholds. Subsequent to the completion of the Self Administration Transaction, such liability is required to be recorded at fair value. During the year ended December 31, 2019, subsequent to the Self Administration Transaction, such liability increased by $200,000 to $31.1 million based on an updated discounted probability weighted forecast. As of December 31, 2019, we had added incremental assets under management of approximately $135 million since the close of the Self Administration Transaction.
F-29
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Allocation of Consideration
The consideration transferred pursuant to the Self Administration Transaction was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based upon their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
Identifiable Assets Acquired at Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
36,443 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
94,999 |
|
Land |
|
|
975,000 |
|
Building |
|
|
5,389,000 |
|
Site Improvements |
|
|
136,000 |
|
Equipment, furniture and fixtures |
|
|
651,000 |
|
Investments in Managed REITs |
|
|
5,600,000 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,084,629 |
|
Intangibles - customer relationships |
|
|
1,600,000 |
|
Trademarks |
|
|
19,800,000 |
|
Intangibles - management contracts |
|
|
24,900,000 |
|
Total identifiable assets acquired |
|
$ |
60,267,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable Liabilities Assumed at Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
$ |
19,219,126 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
722,286 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities, net |
|
|
7,415,654 |
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
$ |
27,357,066 |
|
Net identifiable assets acquired |
|
$ |
32,910,005 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
78,372,980 |
|
Non-controlling interest related to consolidated Tenant Programs joint ventures |
|
|
(21,800 |
) |
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
111,261,185 |
|
The fair value estimate of property and equipment utilized a combination of the income, cost and market approaches, depending on the characteristics of the asset classification. The fair value of land was determined using the market approach, which considers sales of comparable assets and applies compensating factors for any differences specific to the particular assets. Equipment was valued based on estimated replacement cost. Building and site improvements were valued using the cost approach using a direct cost model built on estimates of replacement cost.
The intangible assets acquired primarily consist of trademarks and the property management and advisory contracts related to the Managed REITs. The value of the property management and advisory contracts were determined based on a discounted cash flow valuation of the projected cash flows of the acquired contracts. The deferred tax liability is the result of differences between the GAAP carrying value of certain amortizing assets and the carrying value for tax purposes related to activities which are conducted through our TRS.
The goodwill recognized is supported by several factors, including that the Company is now self-managed; additionally, the Managed REIT Platform business brings an established management platform with numerous strategic benefits including growth from new income streams and the ability to offer new products.
The results of the acquisition have been included in our consolidated statements of operations since the closing date of the transaction.
F-30
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Debt Assumed
Secured debt – Ladera Office Loan
In connection with the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, we, through 10 Terrace Rd, assumed a loan (the "Ladera Office Loan") with KeyBank National Association ("KeyBank") with a principal amount of approximately $4.2 million. The Ladera Office Loan is secured by a first priority deed of trust on the Ladera Office, a promissory note, an assignment of all related leases and rents and a perfected first priority security interests in all personal property, escrows and reserves; additionally, our Operating Partnership provided a non-recourse carve-out guaranty in favor of KeyBank.
The Ladera Office Loan accrues interest at a fixed rate of 4.29% per annum through the maturity date of November 1, 2026. The loan contains a number of other customary terms and covenants.
KeyBank Tenant Program Loan
In connection with the Contribution Agreement, we assumed a term loan with KeyBank in an amount of approximately $15 million (the “KeyBank Tenant Program Loan”). Pursuant to the assumption of the KeyBank Tenant Program Loan, our Executive Chairman and an entity controlled by him continued to be borrowers under the loan. We provided an indemnity to our Executive Chairman and the entity controlled by him against all obligations under the loan. The KeyBank Tenant Program Loan incurred interest at a rate of 1-month Libor plus 350 basis points, resulting in an initial interest rate of approximately 5.90%. Additionally, our Operating Partnership provided a full guaranty in favor of KeyBank.
The KeyBank Tenant Program Loan was paid off in full on October 29, 2019 in connection with the issuance of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock.
Fair Value of Equity Exchanged Related to the Redemption of Limited Partnership Interests
In connection with the Redemption of Limited Partner Interest Agreement and the Contribution Agreement, the Former External Advisor redeemed its special limited partnership interest and 20,000 limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership in exchange for $200,000 in cash and Class A-1 Units. The exchange was accounted for as a transaction among equity holders with no gain or loss recognized. The fair value of the special limited partnership interest contributed was determined to be approximately $18.8 million, while the book value of the Class A-1 Units issued that was recorded in noncontrolling interest was approximately $9.1 million. The difference between the fair value of the special limited partnership interest received and the book value of the Operating Partnership Units issued was recorded to additional paid in capital.
The estimated fair value of the Class A-1 Units issued was determined consistent with the methodology described above. The fair value of the special limited partnership interest was determined based on discounted projections of the future value of the special limited partnership interest which included various assumptions, including estimated future distributions and the related timing thereto.
Administrative Services Agreement
On June 28, 2019, we along with our Operating Partnership, the TRS and SSA (collectively, the “Company Parties”) entered into an Administrative Services Agreement with SAM (the “Administrative Services Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company Parties will be reimbursed for providing certain operational and administrative services to SAM which may include, without limitation, accounting and financial support, IT support, HR support, advisory services and operations support, and administrative support as set forth in the Administrative Services Agreement and SAM will be reimbursed for providing certain operational and administrative services to the Company Parties which may include, without limitation, due diligence support, marketing, fulfillment and offering support, events support, insurance support, and administrative and facilities support. SAM will receive a monthly administrative service fee for providing its services and the Company Parties will receive monthly reimbursement based on the amount of services provided under the Administrative Services Agreement. SAM will also pay the Company Parties an allocation of rent and overhead for the portion it occupies in the Ladera Office. Such agreement has a term of three years, and is subject to certain adjustments as defined in the agreement.
F-31
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Registration Rights Agreement
On June 28, 2019, we and our Operating Partnership entered into a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) with SS OP Holdings and certain other parties (collectively, the “Holders”). Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, the Holders have the right after the Lock-Up Expiration to request us to register for resale under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, shares of our common stock issued or issuable to such Holder. We are required to use commercially reasonable efforts to file a registration statement on Form S-3 within 30 days of such request and within 60 days of such request in the case of a registration statement on Form S-11 or such other appropriate form. We will cause such registration statement to become effective as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter. The Registration Rights Agreement also grants the Holders certain “piggyback” registration rights after the Lock-Up Expiration.
Severance Plan
In connection with the Self Administration Transaction, we entered into severance agreements with each of our executive officers (collectively, the “Severance Agreements”). Each of the Severance Agreements for our executive officers (collectively, the “Executive Officer Severance Agreements”) provide for separation payments upon the termination of the executive officer’s employment under various conditions. The level of severance pay varies among executive officers and depends upon the circumstances of the termination of their employment. If the executive officer violates any of the restrictive covenants set forth in the Executive Officer Severance Agreements, that executive officer’s right to receive severance payments pursuant to the Executive Officer Severance Agreements will end immediately.
Note 5. Pro Forma Financial Information (Unaudited)
The table set forth below summarizes, on a pro forma basis, the combined results of operations of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. Such presentation reflects the Company’s acquisitions that occurred during 2019, which met the GAAP definition of a business in effect at that time, as if the acquisitions had occurred as of January 1, 2018. This pro forma information does not purport to represent what the actual consolidated results of operations of the Company would have been for the periods indicated, nor does it purport to predict the results of operations for future periods.
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
|
||
Pro forma revenue |
|
$ |
113,886,094 |
|
|
$ |
84,190,199 |
|
Pro forma operating expenses |
|
$ |
(103,374,709 |
) |
|
$ |
(68,661,890 |
) |
Pro forma net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(27,684,937 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,296,311 |
) |
The pro forma financial information for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were adjusted to exclude approximately $1.6 million and none, respectively, for acquisition related expenses.
F-32
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Note 6. Debt
The Company’s debt is summarized as follows:
Encumbered Property |
|
December 31, 2019 |
|
|
December 31, 2018 |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Maturity Date |
|||
KeyBank CMBS Loan(5) |
|
$ |
95,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
95,000,000 |
|
|
|
3.89 |
% |
|
8/1/2026 |
KeyBank Florida CMBS Loan(6) |
|
|
52,000,000 |
|
|
|
52,000,000 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
% |
|
5/1/2027 |
Midland North Carolina CMBS Loan(7) |
|
|
47,048,287 |
|
|
|
47,249,999 |
|
|
|
5.31 |
% |
|
8/1/2024 |
Canadian CitiBank Loan(8) |
|
|
85,500,660 |
|
|
|
72,846,480 |
|
|
|
4.24 |
% |
|
10/9/2020 |
CMBS SASB Loan(9) |
|
|
235,000,000 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4.76 |
% |
|
2/9/2022 |
|
CMBS Loan(10) |
|
|
104,000,000 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
2/1/2029 |
|
Secured Loan(11) (12) |
|
|
85,512,000 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4.26 |
% |
|
1/24/2022 |
|
Stoney Creek Loan(13) |
|
|
5,591,950 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
10/1/2021 |
|
Torbarrie Loan(14) |
|
|
5,936,996 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
9/1/2021 |
|
Ladera Office Loan |
|
|
4,179,994 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4.29 |
% |
|
11/1/2026 |
|
Raleigh/Myrtle Beach promissory note(1) |
|
— |
|
|
|
11,878,396 |
|
|
|
5.73 |
% |
|
N/A |
|
Amended KeyBank Credit Facility(2) |
|
— |
|
|
|
98,782,500 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
N/A |
|
Oakland and Concord Loan(3) |
|
— |
|
|
|
19,483,127 |
|
|
|
3.95 |
% |
|
N/A |
|
$11M KeyBank Subordinate Loan(4) |
|
— |
|
|
|
11,000,000 |
|
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
N/A |
|
Premium on secured debt, net |
|
|
592,505 |
|
|
|
1,228,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs, net |
|
|
(7,629,390 |
) |
|
|
(3,385,395 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
712,733,002 |
|
|
$ |
406,084,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Fixed rate debt with principal and interest payments due monthly. This promissory note was encumbered by five properties, Morrisville, Cary, Raleigh, Myrtle Beach I, and Myrtle Beach II. This loan was repaid in conjunction with the SSGT Merger financing. |
(2) |
As of December 31, 2018, this facility encumbered 21 properties (Xenia, Sidney, Troy, Greenville, Washington Court House, Richmond, Connersville, Vallejo, Port St. Lucie I, Sacramento, Sonoma, Las Vegas I, Las Vegas II, Las Vegas III, Baltimore, Aurora II, Plantation, Wellington, Naples, Port St. Lucie II, and Doral). This loan was repaid in conjunction with the SSGT Merger financing. |
(3) |
This loan was assumed during the acquisition of the Oakland and Concord properties, along with an interest rate swap with USAmeriBank that fixed the interest rate at 3.95%. This loan was repaid in conjunction with the SSGT Merger financing. |
(4) |
This variable rate loan encumbered 49% of the equity interest in the entities that own the 34 properties (the 29 properties encumbered by the KeyBank CMBS Loan and the five properties encumbered by the KeyBank Florida CMBS Loan), and was subordinate to the existing KeyBank CMBS Loan and KeyBank Florida CMBS Loan. This loan was repaid in conjunction with the SSGT Merger financing. |
(5) |
This fixed rate loan encumbers 29 properties (Whittier, La Verne, Santa Ana, Upland, La Habra, Monterey Park, Huntington Beach, Chico, Lancaster I, Riverside, Fairfield, Lompoc, Santa Rosa, Federal Heights, Aurora, Littleton, Bloomingdale, Crestwood, Forestville, Warren I, Sterling Heights, Troy, Warren II, Beverly, Everett, Foley, Tampa, Boynton Beach, and Lancaster II) with monthly interest only payments until September 2021, at which time both interest and principal payments will be due monthly. The separate assets of these encumbered properties are not available to pay our other debts. |
(6) |
This fixed rate loan encumbers five properties (Pompano Beach, Lake Worth, Jupiter, Royal Palm Beach, and Delray) with monthly interest only payments until June 2022, at which time both interest and principal payments will be due monthly. The separate assets of these encumbered properties are not available to pay our other debts. |
(7) |
This fixed rate loan encumbers 11 self storage properties (Asheville I, Arden, Asheville II, Hendersonville I, Asheville III, Asheville IV, Asheville V, Asheville VI, Asheville VII, Asheville VIII, and Hendersonville II) with monthly interest only payments until September 2019, at which time both interest and principal payments became due monthly. |
(8) |
This variable rate loan encumbers 10 of our Canadian properties and the amount shown above is in USD based on the foreign exchange rates in effect as of the dates presented. We have purchased interest rate caps that cap CDOR at 3.0% until October 15, 2021. The separate assets of these encumbered properties are not available to pay our other debts. |
F-33
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
(9) |
This variable rate loan encumbers our 29 properties (Morrisville, Cary, Raleigh, Vallejo, Xenia, Sidney, Troy, Greenville, Washington Court House, Richmond, Connersville, Port St Lucie, Sacramento, Concord, Oakland, Wellington, Doral, Naples, Baltimore, Aurora, Jones Blvd - Las Vegas, Russell Rd - Las Vegas, Riverside, Stockton, Azusa, Romeoville, Elgin, San Antonio, Kingwood). In June 2019, we purchased an interest rate swap whereby LIBOR is fixed at 1.79% though February 15, 2022. The separate assets of these encumbered properties are not available to pay our other debts. |
(10) |
This fixed rate loan encumbers 10 properties (Myrtle Beach I, Myrtle Beach II, Port St. Lucie, Plantation, Sonoma, Las Vegas I, Las Vegas II, Las Vegas III, Ft Pierce, Nantucket Island). |
(11) |
This variable rate loan encumbers 16 properties (Colorado Springs, Aurora, Phoenix, 3173 Sweeten Creek Rd - Asheville, Elk Grove, Garden Grove, Deaverview Rd - Asheville, Highland Center Blvd - Asheville, Sarasota, Mount Pleasant, Pembroke Pines, Riverview, Eastlake, McKinney, Hualapai Way - Las Vegas, Gilbert). The separate assets of these encumbered properties are not available to pay our other debts. |
(12) |
On January 29, 2019, we entered into a $161.2 million notional interest rate swap whereby LIBOR was fixed at approximately 2.6% until August 1, 2020. On October 29, 2019, in connection with the pay off of the Senior Term Loan, we terminated approximately $75.7 million of this interest rate swap which required a settlement payment of approximately $0.6 million. |
(13) |
This variable rate loan bears interest at a rate of 1.95% plus Royal Bank of Canada Prime Rate, which was approximately 3.95% as of December 31, 2019, and in no event shall the total interest rate fall below 4.65% per annum. The Stoney Creek loan was assumed in the SSGT Mergers and had a balance of approximately $5 million USD as of the SSGT Mergers date. The Stoney Creek loan is secured by a first lien deed of trust on the Stoney Creek property and all improvements thereto, is cross-collateralized with the Torbarrie property, and is guaranteed by the Company. The amount shown above is in USD based on the foreign exchange rate in effect as of December 31, 2019. |
(14) |
This variable rate loan bears interest at a rate of 1.95% plus Royal Bank of Canada Prime Rate, which was approximately 3.95% as of December 31, 2019, and in no event shall the total interest rate fall below 4.65% per annum. The Torbarrie loan was assumed in the SSGT Mergers and had no outstanding balance as of the date of the SSGT Mergers. The Torbarrie loan is a construction loan, which allows for borrowings up to approximately $10.3 million CAD and is secured by a first lien deed of trust on the Torbarrie property and all improvements thereto, is cross-collateralized with the Stoney Creek property, and is guaranteed by the Company. The amount shown above is in USD based on the foreign exchange rate in effect as of December 31, 2019. |
The weighted average interest rate on our consolidated debt as of December 31, 2019 was approximately 4.6%. We are subject to certain restrictive covenants relating to the outstanding debt. As of December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with all such covenants.
On January 24, 2019, in conjunction with the SSGT Mergers, we, through certain wholly-owned special purpose entities, entered into various financings (“SSGT Merger Financings”), as follows:
Merger Financings |
|
Principal Borrowing as of Merger Date |
|
|
CMBS SASB Loan |
|
$ |
235,000,000 |
|
CMBS Loan |
|
|
104,000,000 |
|
Secured Loan |
|
|
89,178,000 |
|
Senior Term Loan |
|
|
72,000,000 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
500,178,000 |
|
F-34
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
The proceeds from the SSGT Merger Financings were primarily used to facilitate the SSGT Mergers as previously described, including the payment of the SSGT merger consideration and the repayment, in full, of certain of our debt, as follows:
Merger Financings |
|
Principal Repaid |
|
|
Raleigh/Myrtle Beach promissory note |
|
$ |
11,862,471 |
|
Amended KeyBank Credit Facility |
|
|
98,782,500 |
|
Oakland and Concord loan |
|
|
19,443,753 |
|
$11M KeyBank Subordinate Loan |
|
|
11,000,000 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
141,088,724 |
|
In conjunction with the SSGT Merger Financings, we recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately $1.5 million, primarily attributable to prepayment penalties related to the early pay off of the Raleigh/Myrtle Beach promissory note and the write-off of the unamortized loan premium and debt issuance costs on the repaid loans.
CMBS SASB Loan
This loan is a $235 million commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”), single-asset/single-borrower (“SASB”) financing (the “CMBS SASB Loan”) with KeyBank, National Association (“KeyBank”) and Citi Real Estate Funding Inc. or its affiliates (“Citibank”), as initial lenders (together, the “CMBS SASB Lenders”), comprised of (A) a mortgage loan in the amount of $180 million (the “CMBS SASB Mortgage Loan”) and (B) a mezzanine loan in the amount of $55 million (the “CMBS SASB Mezzanine Loan”). The CMBS SASB Mortgage Loan is secured by a first mortgage or deed of trust on each of 29 wholly owned properties (the “CMBS SASB Properties”), and the CMBS SASB Mezzanine Loan is secured by a pledge of the equity interests in the 29 special purpose entities that own the CMBS SASB Properties. Each loan has a maturity date of February 9, 2022, which may, in certain circumstances, be extended at the option of the respective borrower for two consecutive terms of one year each, as set forth in the respective loan agreement (collectively, the “CMBS SASB Loan Agreements”). Monthly payments due under the CMBS SASB Loan Agreements are interest-only, with the full principal amount becoming due and payable on the respective maturity date.
The amounts outstanding under the CMBS SASB Loan Agreements bear interest at an annual rate equal to LIBOR plus 3%. In addition, pursuant to the requirements of the CMBS SASB Loan Agreements: (a) the borrower with respect to the CMBS SASB Mortgage Loan has purchased an interest rate cap with a notional amount of $180 million, with an effective date of January 24, 2019, whereby LIBOR is capped at 3% through February 15, 2022 and (b) the borrower with respect to the CMBS SASB Mezzanine Loan has purchased an interest rate cap with a notional amount of $55 million, with an effective date of January 24, 2019, whereby LIBOR is capped at 3% through February 15, 2022. On June 7, 2019, to effectively terminate our $180 million and $55 million existing interest rate caps, we sold an offsetting interest rate cap with a notional amount of $235 million, whereby LIBOR is capped at 3% through February 15, 2022. We simultaneously entered into an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $235 million, whereby LIBOR is fixed at 1.79% through February 15, 2022. None of the CMBS SASB Loan may be prepaid, in whole or in part, without satisfying certain conditions as set forth in the respective CMBS SASB Loan Agreements, such as the payment of a spread maintenance premium if the prepayment is made within the first two years. Thereafter the CMBS SASB Loan may be prepaid in whole or in part at par without penalty.
The loan documents for the CMBS SASB Loan contain: customary affirmative, negative and financial covenants; agreements; representations; warranties and borrowing conditions; reserve requirements and events of default all as set forth in such loan documents. In addition, and pursuant to the terms of the limited recourse guaranties, with respect to the CMBS SASB Mortgage Loan (the “CMBS SASB Mortgage Loan Guaranty”), and with respect to the CMBS SASB Mezzanine Loan (the “CMBS SASB Mezzanine Loan Guaranty” and collectively the “CMBS SASB Guarantees”), each dated January 24, 2019, in favor of the CMBS SASB Lenders, the Company serves as a non-recourse guarantor with respect to each of the CMBS SASB Mortgage Loan and the CMBS SASB Mezzanine Loan and is subject to certain net worth and liquidity requirements, each as described in the CMBS SASB Guarantees.
F-35
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
CMBS Loan
The CMBS loan is a $104 million CMBS financing with KeyBank as lender (the “CMBS Lender”) pursuant to a mortgage loan (the “CMBS Loan”), and is secured by a first mortgage or deed of trust on each of 10 wholly owned properties. The loan has a maturity date of February 1, 2029. Monthly payments due under the loan agreement (the “CMBS Loan Agreement”) are interest-only, with the full principal amount becoming due and payable on the maturity date.
The amounts outstanding under the CMBS Loan bear interest at an annual fixed rate equal to 5%. Commencing two years after securitization, the CMBS Loan may be defeased in whole, but not in part, subject to certain conditions as set forth in the CMBS Loan Agreement.
The loan documents for the CMBS Loan contain: customary affirmative, negative and financial covenants; agreements; representations; warranties and borrowing conditions; reserve requirements and events of default all as set forth in such loan documents. In addition, and pursuant to the terms of the limited recourse guaranty dated January 24, 2019, in favor of the CMBS Lender, the Company serves as a non-recourse guarantor with respect to the CMBS Loan.
Secured Loan
This represents secured financing with KeyBank, Fifth Third Bank (“Fifth Third”), and SunTrust Bank (“SunTrust”) as equal co-lenders (the “Secured Lenders”) for an amount up to approximately $96.4 million pursuant to a mortgage loan (the “Secured Loan”). At close, the Secured Loan was secured by a first mortgage or deed of trust on each of 16 wholly owned properties. The loan has a maturity date of January 24, 2022, which may, in certain circumstances, be extended at the option of the borrower for one additional term equal to one year, as set forth in the Secured Loan Agreement. Monthly payments due under the Secured Loan Agreement are interest-only, with the full principal amount becoming due and payable on the maturity date. On January 24, 2019, an initial borrowing of approximately $89.2 million was made under the Secured Loan. On July 11, 2019, in conjunction with the acquisition of the Gilbert Property, the Gilbert Property was mortgaged pursuant to the terms of the loan agreement (the “Secured Loan Agreement”), and an additional approximate $5.7 million was drawn. On August 30, 2019, we drew an additional approximately $0.5 million from the interest reserve, increasing the then total amount outstanding on the loan to approximately $95.4 million. On October 18, 2019, in connection with the sale of our San Antonio II property, we paid off approximately $9.9 million of the Secured Loan.
The amounts outstanding under the Secured Loan Agreement bear interest at an annual rate equal to LIBOR plus 2.5%. On January 24, 2019, the borrowers entered into an interest rate swap arrangement with a notional amount of approximately $89.2 million, such that LIBOR is fixed at approximately 2.6% until August 1, 2020. On October 29, 2019, in connection with the settlement of the Senior Term Loan, we restructured this swap to reduce the notional amount to approximately $85.5 million, an amount equivalent to the then outstanding principal on the Secured Loan. The Secured Loan may be prepaid at any time, subject to certain conditions as set forth in the Secured Loan Agreement.
The loan documents for the Secured Loan contain: customary affirmative, negative and financial covenants; agreements; representations; warranties and borrowing conditions; reserve requirements and events of default all as set forth in such loan documents. In particular, the Secured Loan Agreement imposes certain requirements on the Company such as a total leverage ratio, tangible net worth and liquidity requirements, fixed charge coverage ratios and limits on the amount of unhedged variable rate debt exposure. In addition, and pursuant to the terms of the full recourse guaranty (the “Secured Loan Guaranty”), dated January 24, 2019, in favor of the Secured Lenders, we, along with our Operating Partnership serve as full recourse guarantors with respect to the Secured Loan.
Senior Term Loan
We along with our Operating Partnership entered into a financing for an amount up to $87.7 million with KeyBank and SunTrust, as co-lenders (the “Senior Term Lenders”), pursuant to a senior term loan (the “Senior Term Loan”). The Senior Term Loan was secured by a pledge of 49% of the equity interests in our property-owning special purpose entities, other than those that own the CMBS SASB Properties. The Senior Term Loan was made pursuant to a loan agreement with a maturity date of January 24, 2022 (the “Senior Term Loan Agreement”). Monthly payments due under the Senior Term Loan Agreement were interest-only, with the full principal amount becoming due and payable on the maturity date. On January 24, 2019, an initial borrowing of $72.0 million was made under the Senior Term Loan with the right to draw an additional $15.7 million as set forth in the Senior Term Loan Agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we drew a total of an additional $14.3 million.
F-36
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
The amounts outstanding under the Senior Term Loan Agreement incurred interest at an annual rate equal to LIBOR plus 4.25%. On January 24, 2019, we entered into an interest rate swap arrangement with a notional amount of $72 million, such that LIBOR was fixed at approximately 2.6% until August 1, 2020.
The Senior Term Loan was paid off in full on October 29, 2019 in connection with the issuance of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock.
Canadian CitiBank Loan
On October 11, 2018, we, through 10 special purpose entities wholly owned by our Operating Partnership, entered into a loan agreement with CitiBank, N.A. (“CitiBank”), as lender. Under the terms of the loan agreement (the “CitiBank Loan Agreement”), we have a maximum borrowing capacity of $112 million CAD, of which we initially borrowed $99.3 million CAD (the “Initial Proceeds”). The Initial Proceeds were primarily used to pay off all of the existing loans encumbering 10 of our properties located in the greater Toronto area, Canada, all of which now serve as collateral under the CitiBank Loan Agreement. As of December 31, 2019, we had an outstanding balance of $111.3 million CAD, and have the right to receive future advances in the aggregate amount of up to $0.7 million CAD, subject to certain conditions as set forth in the CitiBank Loan Agreement.
The CitiBank Loan Agreement is a term loan that matures on October 9, 2020, which may, in certain circumstances, be extended at our option for three consecutive terms of one year each. Monthly payments due under the CitiBank Loan Agreement are interest-only, with the full principal amount becoming due and payable on the maturity date.
The amounts outstanding under the CitiBank Loan Agreement bear interest at a rate equal to the sum of the “CDOR” (as defined in the CitiBank Loan Agreement) and 2.25%. If we exercise our third extension option, the interest rate shall be increased by 0.25%. In addition, pursuant to the requirements of the CitiBank Loan Agreement, we have purchased interest rate caps with a combined notional amount of $112 million CAD, whereby the CDOR is capped at 3.00% through October 15, 2021.
Amended KeyBank Credit Facility
On December 22, 2015, we, through our Operating Partnership, and certain affiliated entities, entered into an amended and restated revolving credit facility (the “Amended KeyBank Credit Facility”) with KeyBank National Association (“KeyBank”), as administrative agent and KeyBanc Capital Markets, LLC, as the sole book runner and sole lead arranger, and Texas Capital Bank, N.A., and Comerica Bank as co-lenders.
Under the terms of the Amended KeyBank Credit Facility, we initially had a maximum borrowing capacity of $105 million.
On February 18, 2016, we entered into a first amendment and joinder to the amended and restated credit agreement (the “First Amendment”) with KeyBank. Under the terms of the First Amendment, we added an additional $40 million to our maximum borrowing capacity for a total of $145 million with the admission of US Bank National Association (the “Subsequent Lender”). The Subsequent Lender also became a party to the Amended KeyBank Credit Facility through a joinder agreement in the First Amendment.
The Amended KeyBank Credit Facility was a revolving loan with an initial term of three years, maturing on December 22, 2018, with two e amended our Amended KeyBank Credit Facility to extend the maturity date until February 20, 2019 and reduce the maximum borrowing capacity from $145 million to $110 million. Payments due pursuant to the Amended KeyBank Credit Facility were interest-only. As of December 31, 2018, we had approximately $98.8 million in borrowings outstanding under the Amended KeyBank Credit Facility. On January 24, 2019, we paid off and terminated the Amended KeyBank Credit Facility in conjunction with the SSGT Mergers.
extension options subject to certain conditions outlined further in the credit agreement for the Amended KeyBank Credit Facility (the “Amended Credit Agreement”). On October 29, 2018, wF-37
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
The following table presents the future principal payment requirements on outstanding debt as of December 31, 2019:
2020 |
|
$ |
86,208,937 |
|
2021 |
|
|
12,823,585 |
|
2022 |
|
|
323,426,829 |
|
2023 |
|
|
3,384,578 |
|
2024 |
|
|
47,035,146 |
|
2025 and thereafter |
|
|
246,890,812 |
|
Total payments |
|
|
719,769,887 |
|
Premium on secured debt, net |
|
|
592,505 |
|
Debt issuance costs, net |
|
|
(7,629,390 |
) |
Total |
|
$ |
712,733,002 |
|
Note 7. Preferred Equity
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
On October 29, 2019 (the “Commitment Date”), we entered into a preferred stock purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Extra Space Storage LP (the “Investor”), a subsidiary of Extra Space Storage Inc. (NYSE: EXR), pursuant to which the Investor committed to purchase up to $200 million in preferred shares (the aggregate shares to be purchased, the “Preferred Shares”) of our new Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A Convertible Preferred Stock”), in one or more closings (each, a “Closing,” and collectively, the “Closings”). The initial closing (the “Initial Closing”) in the amount of $150 million occurred on the Commitment Date. The Investor has committed to purchase up to an additional $50 million, at our option, within 12 months following the Initial Closing, subject to certain limitations. We pay the Investor a fee of 0.25% per annum on the remaining commitment amount until drawn, or the 12-month anniversary of the Initial Closing. We incurred approximately $3.6 million in issuance costs related to the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, which are recorded as a reduction to Series A Convertible Preferred stock on our consolidated balance sheet.
In connection with the Initial Closing, we filed articles supplementary to our Second Articles of Amendment and Restatement, which classified and designated 200,000 authorized but unissued shares of Preferred Stock as the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. The shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock rank senior to all other shares our capital stock, including our common stock, with respect to rights to receive dividends and to participate in distributions or payments upon any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company. Dividends payable on each share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock will initially be equal to a rate of 6.25% per annum. If the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock has not been redeemed on or prior to the fifth anniversary date of the Initial Closing, the dividend rate will increase an additional 0.75% per annum each year thereafter to a maximum of 9.0% per annum until the tenth anniversary of the Initial Closing, at which time the dividend rate shall increase 0.75% per annum each year thereafter until the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock is redeemed or repurchased in full. The dividends are payable in arrears for the prior calendar quarter on or before the 15th day of March, June, September and December of each year.
Upon any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, the holders of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive a payment equal to the greater of (i) aggregate purchase price of all outstanding Preferred Shares, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends (the “Liquidation Amount”) and (ii) the amount that that would have been payable had the Preferred Shares been converted into common stock pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement immediately prior to such liquidation.
Subject to certain additional redemption rights, as described herein, we have the right to redeem the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock for cash at any time following the fifth anniversary of the Initial Closing. The amount of such redemption will be equal to the Liquidation Amount. Upon the listing of our common stock on a national securities exchange (the “Listing”), we have the right to redeem any or all outstanding Series A Convertible Preferred Stock at an amount equal to the greater of (i) the amount that would have been payable had such Preferred Shares been converted into common stock pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement immediately prior to the Listing, and then all of such Preferred Shares were sold in the Listing, or (ii) the Liquidation Amount, plus a premium amount (the “Premium Amount”) of 10%, 8%, 6%, 4%, or 2% if redeemed prior to the first, second, third, fourth, or fifth anniversary dates of issuance, respectively, or 0% if
F-38
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
redeemed thereafter, as set forth in the Articles Supplementary. Upon a change of control event, we have the right to redeem any or all outstanding Series A Convertible Preferred Stock at an amount equal to the greater of (i) the amount that would have been payable had the Preferred Shares been converted into common stock pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement immediately prior to such change of control or (ii) the Liquidation Amount, plus the Premium Amount, as set forth in the Articles Supplementary. In addition, subject to certain cure provisions, if we fail to maintain our status as a real estate investment trust, the holders of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock have the right to require us to repurchase the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock at an amount equal to the Liquidation Amount with no Premium Amount.
At any time after the earlier to occur of (i) the second anniversary of the Initial Closing or (ii) 180 days after a Listing, the holders of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock have the right to convert any or all of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock held by such holders into common stock at a rate per share equal to the quotient obtained by dividing the Liquidation Amount by the conversion price. The conversion price is $10.66, as may be adjusted in connection with stock splits, stock dividends and other similar transactions.
The holders of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock are not entitled to vote on any matter submitted to a vote of our stockholders, except that in the event that the dividend for the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock has not been paid for at least four quarters (whether or not consecutive), the holders of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock have the right to vote together with our stockholders on any matter submitted to a vote of our stockholders, upon which the holders of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and holders of common stock shall vote together as a single class. The number of votes applicable to a share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock will be equal to the number of shares of common stock a share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock could have been converted into as of the record date set for purposes of such stockholder vote. This foregoing limited voting right shall cease when all past dividend periods have been paid in full. In addition, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock is required in certain customary circumstances, as well as other circumstances, such as (i) our real estate portfolio exceeding a leverage ratio of 60% loan-to-value, (ii) entering into certain transactions with our Executive Chairman as of the Commitment Date, or his affiliates, (iii) effecting a merger (or similar) transaction with an entity whose assets are not at least 80% self storage related and (iv) entering into any line of business other than self storage and ancillary businesses, unless such ancillary business represents revenues of less than 10% of our revenues for our last fiscal year.
In connection with the issuance of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, we and the Investor also entered into an investors’ rights agreement (the “Investors’ Rights Agreement”) which provides the Investor with certain customary protections, including demand registration rights and “piggyback” registration rights with respect to our common stock issued to the Investor upon conversion of the Preferred Shares.
As of December 31, 2019 there were 150,000 Preferred Shares outstanding with an aggregate liquidation preference of approximately $151.7 million, which consisted of $150 million from the Initial Closing and approximately $1.6 million of accumulated and unpaid distributions. There were no Preferred Shares issued or outstanding as of December 31, 2018.
Note 8. Derivative Instruments
Interest Rate Derivatives
Our objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, we use interest rate swaps and caps as part of our interest rate risk management strategy. The effective portion of the change in the fair value of the derivative that qualifies as a cash flow hedge is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. Amounts reported in AOCI related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on our variable-rate debt.
We do not use interest rate derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage our exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but we have elected not to apply hedge accounting. Changes in the fair value of interest rate derivatives not designated in hedging relationships are recorded in other income (expense) within our consolidated statements of operations and was approximately $0.6 million and none for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. A majority of this expense was attributable to the early termination of approximately $75.7 million of an interest rate swap in connection with the payoff of the Senior Term Loan. This settlement resulted in the recognition of an expense of approximately $0.6 million reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income.
F-39
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Foreign Currency Hedges
Our objectives in using foreign currency derivatives are to add stability to potential fluctuations in exchange rates between foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar and to manage our exposure to exchange rate movements. To accomplish this objective, we use foreign currency forwards and foreign currency options as part of our exchange rate risk management strategy. A foreign currency forward contract is a commitment to deliver a certain amount of currency at a certain price on a specific date in the future. By entering into the forward contract and holding it to maturity, we are locked into a future currency exchange rate in an amount equal to and for the term of the forward contract. A foreign currency option contract is a commitment by the seller of the option to deliver, solely at the option of the buyer, a certain amount of currency at a certain price on a specific date. For derivatives designated as net investment hedges, the changes in the fair value of the derivatives are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income. Amounts are reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings when the hedged net investment is either sold or substantially liquidated.
The following table summarizes the terms of our derivative financial instruments as of December 31, 2019:
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Strike |
|
|
Effective Date or Date Assumed |
|
Maturity Date |
||
Interest Rate Swaps: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIBOR Swap |
|
$ |
85,512,000 |
|
(3) |
|
2.61 |
% |
|
January 24, 2019 |
|
August 1, 2020 |
LIBOR Swap |
|
|
235,000,000 |
|
|
|
1.79 |
% |
|
June 15, 2019 |
|
February 15, 2022 |
Interest Rate Caps: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDOR Cap |
|
$ |
99,300,000 |
|
(1) |
|
3.00 |
% |
|
October 11, 2018 |
|
October 15, 2021 |
CDOR Cap |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
(1) |
|
3.00 |
% |
|
March 28, 2019 |
|
October 15, 2021 |
CDOR Cap |
|
|
11,700,000 |
|
(1) |
|
3.00 |
% |
|
May 28, 2019 |
|
October 15, 2021 |
Foreign Currency Forward: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominated in CAD |
|
$ |
95,000,000 |
|
(1) |
|
1.323 |
|
|
December 9, 2020 |
|
(2) |
(1) |
Notional amounts shown are denominated in CAD. |
(2) |
We settled this forward on February 10, 2020, receiving a net settlement of approximately $0.5 million and simultaneously entered into another $95 million CAD foreign currency forward with a maturity date of February 10, 2021. |
(3) |
We entered into this Swap on January 24, 2019 for an initial notional amount of approximately $161 million, however, on October 29, 2019, in connection with the settlement of the Senior Term Loan, we terminated approximately $75.7 million of this interest rate swap which required a settlement payment of approximately $0.6 million. |
On March 28, 2018 we settled our then existing $101 million CAD foreign currency forward contract, receiving a net settlement of approximately $2.2 million and simultaneously entered into a $90 million CAD foreign currency forward. We settled the $90 million CAD foreign currency forward on January 25, 2019, receiving a net settlement of approximately $2.1 million and simultaneously entered into a $95 million CAD foreign currency forward. On July 8, 2019 we settled the $95 million CAD foreign currency forward, paying a net settlement of approximately $0.6 million and simultaneously entered into a $95 million CAD currency option. On December 9, 2019 the CAD currency option expired and we simultaneously entered into a two month $95 million CAD foreign currency forward. A portion of our gain (loss) from our settled and unsettled foreign currency hedges is recorded net in foreign currency hedge contract gain (loss) in our consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, the other portion, a loss of approximately $0.4 million and a gain of approximately $1.0 million related to the ineffective portion is recorded in other income (expense) within our consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
F-40
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
The following table summarizes the terms of our derivative financial instruments as of December 31, 2018:
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Strike |
|
|
Effective Date or Date Assumed |
|
Maturity Date |
||
Interest Rate Swaps: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oakland and Concord loan |
|
$ |
19,483,127 |
|
(2) |
|
3.95 |
% |
|
May 18, 2016 |
|
April 10, 2023 |
Interest Rate Cap: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDOR Cap |
|
$ |
99,300,000 |
|
(1) |
|
3.00 |
% |
|
October 11, 2018 |
|
October 15, 2021 |
Foreign Currency Forward: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominated in CAD |
|
$ |
90,000,000 |
|
(1) |
|
1.2846 |
|
|
March 28, 2018 |
|
(3) |
(1) |
Notional amount shown is denominated in CAD. |
(2) |
The Oakland and Concord loan interest rate swap was settled on January 24, 2019 in conjunction with the SSGT Mergers. |
(3) |
We settled this foreign currency forward on January 25, 2019 and received a settlement of approximately $2.1 million |
The following table presents a gross presentation of the fair value of our derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:
|
|
Asset/Liability Derivatives |
|
|||||
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|||||
Balance Sheet Location |
|
December 31, 2019 |
|
|
December 31, 2018 |
|
||
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
361,802 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
1,695,140 |
|
|
— |
|
|
Interest Rate Caps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
28,847 |
|
|
$ |
87,808 |
|
Foreign Currency Hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,016,806 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
1,425,632 |
|
|
— |
|
Note 9. Segment Disclosures
Prior to the Self Administration Transaction on June 28, 2019, we internally evaluated all of our properties and interests therein as one industry segment and, accordingly, did not report segment information.
Subsequent to the Self Administration Transaction, we now operate in two reportable business segments: (i) self storage operations and (ii) our Managed REIT Platform business.
Management evaluates performance based upon net operating income (“NOI”). For our self storage operations, NOI is defined as leasing and related revenues, less property level operating expenses. NOI for the Company’s Managed REIT Platform business represents Managed REIT Platform revenues less Managed REIT Platform expenses.
F-41
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
The following table summarizes information for the reportable segments for the year ended December 31, 2019 below:
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed REIT |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Self Storage |
|
|
Platform |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Total |
|
||||
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Self storage rental revenue |
|
$ |
99,494,560 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
99,494,560 |
|
Ancillary operating revenue |
|
|
3,706,700 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,706,700 |
|
Managed REIT Platform revenue |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,068,306 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,068,306 |
|
Reimbursable costs from Managed REITs |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,258,983 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,258,983 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
103,201,260 |
|
|
|
6,327,289 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
109,528,549 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses |
|
|
35,723,111 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
35,723,111 |
|
Property operating expenses – affiliates |
|
|
6,605,670 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,605,670 |
|
Managed REIT Platform expense |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,739,556 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,739,556 |
|
Reimbursable costs from Managed REITs |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,258,983 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,258,983 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,461,453 |
|
|
|
10,461,453 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
29,305,979 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
299,299 |
|
|
|
29,605,278 |
|
Intangible amortization expense |
|
|
9,051,083 |
|
|
|
2,442,311 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
11,493,394 |
|
Contingent earnout expense |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Self administration transaction expenses |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,572,238 |
|
|
|
1,572,238 |
|
Acquisition expenses – affiliates |
|
|
84,061 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
84,061 |
|
Other property acquisition expenses |
|
|
141,489 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
141,489 |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
80,911,393 |
|
|
|
8,440,850 |
|
|
|
12,532,990 |
|
|
|
101,885,233 |
|
Gain on sale of real estate |
|
|
3,944,696 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,944,696 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
26,234,563 |
|
|
|
(2,113,561 |
) |
|
|
(12,532,990 |
) |
|
|
11,588,012 |
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(37,469,725 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(93,522 |
) |
|
|
(37,563,247 |
) |
Interest expense – accretion of fair market value of secured debt |
|
|
131,611 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
131,611 |
|
Interest expense – debt issuance costs |
|
|
(3,990,421 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(6,255 |
) |
|
|
(3,996,676 |
) |
Net loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(2,635,278 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(12,355 |
) |
|
|
(2,647,633 |
) |
Gain resulting from acquisition of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
8,017,353 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,017,353 |
|
Other |
|
|
(1,159,570 |
) |
|
|
534,612 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(624,958 |
) |
Net loss |
|
$ |
(10,871,467 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,578,949 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,645,122 |
) |
|
$ |
(25,095,538 |
) |
The following table summarizes our total assets by segment:
Segments |
|
December 31, 2019 |
|
|
|
Self Storage |
|
$ |
1,175,887,634 |
|
(1) |
Managed REIT Platform |
|
|
73,939,002 |
|
(1) |
Corporate and Other |
|
|
61,607,095 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,311,433,731 |
|
|
(1) |
Included in the assets of the Self Storage and the Managed REIT Platform segments are approximately $45.3 million, and $33.1 million of goodwill, respectively. |
Note 10. Related Party Transactions
Through the closing of the Self Administration Transaction on June 28, 2019, we incurred expenses under the following advisory and property management agreements; commencing on such closing and continuing thereafter we will no longer incur such expenses. The Dealer Manager Agreement and the Transfer Agent Agreement described below were not impacted by the Self Administration Transaction.
Fees to Affiliates
Our Advisory Agreement with our Former External Advisor, our dealer manager agreement, as amended ("Dealer Manager Agreement") with our Dealer Manager, our Property Management Agreements with our Former External Property Managers and our Transfer Agent Agreement with our Transfer Agent entitle such affiliates to specified fees upon the
F-42
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
provision of certain services with regard to the Offering and investment of funds in real estate properties, among other services, as well as certain reimbursements, as described below.
Advisory Agreement
Prior to the Self Administration Transaction we did not have any employees. Our Former External Advisor was primarily responsible for managing our business affairs and carrying out the directives of our board of directors. Our Former External Advisor received various fees and expenses under the terms of our Advisory Agreement. As a result of the Self Administration Transaction, on June 28, 2019 we acquired approximately 350 self storage professionals and other personnel and now perform such services on our own behalf.
Our Advisory Agreement also required our Former External Advisor to reimburse us to the extent that offering expenses, including sales commissions, dealer manager fees, stockholder servicing fees and organization and offering expenses, were in excess of 15% of gross proceeds from the Offering. However, subsequent to the termination of our Primary Offering on January 9, 2017, we determined offering expenses were not in excess of 15% of gross proceeds from the Offering, and thus there was no reimbursement.
Our Former External Advisor received acquisition fees equal to 1.75% of the contract purchase price of each property we acquired plus reimbursement of any acquisition expenses incurred by our Former External Advisor. Our Former External Advisor also received a monthly asset management fee equal to 0.05208%, which is one-twelfth of 0.625%, of our aggregate asset value, as defined in the Advisory Agreement.
Under our Advisory Agreement, our Former External Advisor was entitled to receive disposition fees in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) one-half of the competitive real estate commission or (ii) 1% of the contract sale price for each property we sold, as long as our Former External Advisor provided substantial assistance in connection with the sale. The total real estate commissions paid (including the disposition fee paid to our Advisor) was limited to the lesser of a competitive real estate commission or an amount equal to 6% of the contract sale price of the property.
Our Former External Advisor was also entitled to various subordinated distributions pursuant to our Operating Partnership Agreement if we (1) listed our shares of common stock on a national exchange, (2) terminated our Advisory Agreement (other than a voluntary termination), (3) liquidated our portfolio, or (4) entered into an Extraordinary Transaction, as it was defined in the Operating Partnership Agreement.
Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, our Former External Advisor was entitled to reimbursement of our Former External Advisor’s direct and indirect costs of providing administrative and management services to us. Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, our Former External Advisor was obligated to pay or reimburse us the amount by which our aggregate annual operating expenses, as defined, exceeded the greater of 2% of our average invested assets or 25% of our net income, as defined, unless a majority of our independent directors determined that such excess expenses were justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors.
Dealer Manager Agreement
In connection with our Primary Offering, our Dealer Manager received a sales commission of up to 7.0% of gross proceeds from sales of Class A Shares and up to 2.0% of gross proceeds from the sales of Class T Shares in the Primary Offering and a dealer manager fee up to 3.0% of gross proceeds from sales of both Class A Shares and Class T Shares in the Primary Offering under the terms of the Dealer Manager Agreement. In addition, our Dealer Manager receives an ongoing stockholder servicing fee that is payable monthly and accrues daily in an amount equal to 1/365th of 1% of the purchase price per share of the Class T Shares sold in the Primary Offering. We will cease paying the stockholder servicing fee with respect to the Class T Shares sold in the Primary Offering at the earlier of (i) the date we list our shares on a national securities exchange, merge or consolidate with or into another entity, or sell or dispose of all or substantially all of our assets, (ii) the date at which the aggregate underwriting compensation from all sources equals 10% of the gross proceeds from the sale of both Class A Shares and Class T Shares in our Primary Offering (i.e., excluding proceeds from sales pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan), which calculation shall be made by us with the assistance of our Dealer Manager commencing after the termination of the Primary Offering; (iii) the fifth anniversary of the last day of the fiscal quarter in which our Primary Offering (i.e., excluding our distribution reinvestment plan offering) terminated; and (iv) the date that such Class T Share is redeemed or is no longer outstanding. Our Dealer Manager entered into participating dealer agreements
F-43
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
with certain other broker-dealers which authorized them to sell our shares. Upon sale of our shares by such broker-dealers, our Dealer Manager re-allowed all of the sales commissions and, subject to certain limitations, the stockholder servicing fees paid in connection with sales made by these broker-dealers. Our Dealer Manager could also re-allow to these broker-dealers a portion of their dealer manager fee as marketing fees, reimbursement of certain costs and expenses of attending training and education meetings sponsored by our Dealer Manager, payment of attendance fees required for employees of our Dealer Manager or other affiliates to attend retail seminars and public seminars sponsored by these broker-dealers, or to defray other distribution-related expenses. Our Dealer Manager also received reimbursement of bona fide due diligence expenses; however, to the extent these due diligence expenses could not be justified, any excess over actual due diligence expenses would have been considered underwriting compensation subject to a 10% FINRA limitation and, when aggregated with all other non-accountable expenses in connection with our Offering, could not exceed 3% of gross offering proceeds from sales in the Offering.
Affiliated Dealer Manager
SAM owns a 15% non-voting equity interest in our Dealer Manager. Affiliates of our Dealer Manager own limited partnership interests in our Operating Partnership.
Transfer Agent Agreement
SAM owns 100% of the membership interests of Strategic Transfer Agent Services, LLC, our transfer agent (“Transfer Agent”), which is a registered transfer agent with the SEC. Pursuant to our transfer agent agreement, our Transfer Agent provides transfer agent and registrar services to us. These services are substantially similar to what a third party transfer agent would provide in the ordinary course of performing its functions as a transfer agent, including, but not limited to: providing customer service to our stockholders, processing the distributions and any servicing fees with respect to our shares and issuing regular reports to our stockholder. Our Transfer Agent may retain and supervise third party vendors in its efforts to administer certain services. We believe that our Transfer Agent, through its knowledge and understanding of the direct participation program industry which includes non-traded REITs, is particularly suited to provide us with transfer agent and registrar services. Our Transfer Agent also conducts transfer agent and registrar services for other non-traded REITs sponsored by SRA.
It is the duty of our board of directors to evaluate the performance of our Transfer Agent. Fees paid to our Transfer Agent are based on a fixed quarterly fee, one-time account setup fees and monthly open account fees. In addition, we will reimburse our Transfer Agent for all reasonable expenses or other changes incurred by it in connection with the provision of its services to us, and we will pay our Transfer Agent fees for any additional services we may request from time to time, in accordance with its rates then in effect. Upon the request of our Transfer Agent, we may also advance payment for substantial reasonable out-of-pocket expenditures to be incurred by it.
The initial term of the transfer agent agreement is three years, which term will be automatically renewed for one year successive terms, but either party may terminate the transfer agent agreement upon 90 days’ prior written notice. In the event that we terminate the transfer agent agreement, other than for cause, we will pay our transfer agent all amounts that would have otherwise accrued during the remaining term of the transfer agent agreement; provided, however, that when calculating the remaining months in the term for such purposes, such term is deemed to be a 12 month period starting from the date of the most recent annual anniversary date.
Property Management Agreements
From inception through June 28, 2019, our Former External Property Managers served as the property manager for each of our properties pursuant to separate property management agreements. From October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2017, our Former External Property Managers contracted with Extra Space for Extra Space to serve as the sub-property manager for each of our properties located in the United States pursuant to separate sub-property management agreements for each property. Effective October 1, 2017, our Former External Property Managers terminated their sub-property management agreements with Extra Space. Our Former External Property Managers thereafter managed all our properties directly. An affiliate of our Former External Property Managers reacquired the rights to the “SmartStop® Self Storage” brand in the United States during 2017. As a result, our properties began using the “SmartStop® Self Storage” brand in the United States effective October 1, 2017. In connection with the terminations, each property management agreement that was subject to a sub-property management agreement with Extra Space was amended and, where applicable, we paid Extra Space a termination fee, as described below. As a result of the Self Administration Transaction, we acquired approximately 350 self storage professionals and other personnel and now perform such services on our own behalf.
F-44
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Pursuant to the amended property management agreements, our Former External Property Managers received: (i) a monthly management fee for each property equal to the greater of $3,000 or 6% of the gross revenues from the properties plus reimbursement of the property manager’s costs of managing the properties and (ii) a construction management fee equal to 5% of the cost of construction or capital improvement work in excess of $10,000. In addition, we had agreed with our Former External Property Managers or an affiliate to share equally in the net revenue attributable to the sale of tenant insurance, protection plans, or other indemnity plans at our properties. With respect to each new property we acquired for which we entered into a property management agreement with our Former External Property Managers we paid our Former External Property Managers a one-time start-up fee in the amount of $3,750.
Our self storage properties located in Canada were subject to separate property management agreements with our Former External Property Managers on terms substantially the same as the amended property management agreements described above.
All of our properties in the United States and Canada are operated under the “SmartStop® Self Storage” brand, which as a result of the Self Administration Transaction we now own.
Prior Arrangements (effective between October 1, 2015 and September 30, 2017)
Under the property management agreements in effect for properties we owned between October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2017 for our properties located in the United States, our Former External Property Manager received a monthly management fee for each property equal to the greater of $2,500 or 6% of the gross revenues, plus reimbursement of our Former External Property Manager’s costs of managing the properties. In addition, Extra Space agreed to pay up to $25,000 per property toward the signage and set-up costs associated with converting such property to the Extra Space brand (the “Set-Up Amount”). The property management agreements had a three year term and automatically renewed for successive one year periods thereafter, unless we or our Former External Property Manager provided prior written notice at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the term. In general, if we terminated a property management agreement without cause during the initial three year term, we would have been required to pay our Former External Property Manager a termination fee equal to the Set-Up Amount, reduced by 1/36th of the Set-Up Amount for every full month of the term that had elapsed. After the end of the initial three year term, we could have terminated a property management agreement on 30 days prior written notice without payment of a termination fee. Our Formal External Property Manager could have terminated a property management agreement on 60 days prior written notice to us.
The sub-property management agreements between our Former External Property Manager and Extra Space were substantially the same as the foregoing property management agreements. Under the sub-property management agreements, our Formal External Property Manager paid Extra Space a monthly management fee for each property equal to the greater of $2,500 or 6% of the gross revenues, plus reimbursement of Extra Space’s costs of managing the properties; provided, however that no management fee was due and payable to Extra Space for the months of January and July each year during the term. Extra Space had the exclusive right to offer tenant insurance to the tenants and was entitled to all of the benefits of such tenant insurance. The sub-property management agreements also had a three year term and automatically renewed for successive one year periods thereafter, unless our Former External Property Manager or Extra Space provided prior written notice at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the term. In general, if our Former External Property Manager terminated a sub-property management agreement without cause during the initial three year term, it would have been required to pay Extra Space a termination fee equal to the Set-Up Amount, reduced by 1/36th of the Set-Up Amount for every full month of the term that had elapsed. After the end of the initial three year term, our Former External Property Manager could have terminated a sub-property management agreement on 30 days prior written notice without payment of a termination fee. Extra Space could have terminated a sub-property management agreement on 60 days prior written notice to our Former External Property Manager.
Termination of Sub-property Manager
As of October 1, 2017, our Former External Property Manager terminated each sub-property management agreement with Extra Space, and we amended each of our corresponding property management agreements as described below. To the extent a termination fee would have been owed by any of our property-owning subsidiaries had its corresponding property management agreement with our Former External Property Manager been terminated, each such property-owning subsidiary agreed to pay the termination fee owed by our Former External Property Manager in accordance with its termination of the sub-property management agreements. The aggregate costs incurred in connection with the property management changes were approximately $0.8 million. This amount was included in property operating expenses – affiliates in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.
F-45
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Pursuant to the terms of the agreements described above, the following table summarizes related party costs incurred and paid by us for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2019, as well as any related amounts payable as of December 31, 2018 and 2019:
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Incurred |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Payable |
|
|
Incurred |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Payable |
|
||||||
Expensed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
$ |
2,199,596 |
|
|
$ |
2,336,075 |
|
|
$ |
209,385 |
|
|
$ |
975,985 |
|
|
$ |
1,185,370 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Transfer Agent fees |
|
|
352,300 |
|
|
|
302,839 |
|
|
|
49,461 |
|
|
|
324,943 |
|
|
|
374,404 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Asset management fees |
|
|
5,445,528 |
|
|
|
5,445,528 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,622,558 |
|
|
|
3,622,558 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Property management fees |
|
|
4,809,106 |
|
|
|
4,809,106 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,983,111 |
|
|
|
2,983,111 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Acquisition expenses |
|
|
72,179 |
|
|
|
72,179 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
84,061 |
|
|
|
84,061 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
48,664 |
|
|
|
48,664 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
235,932 |
|
|
|
235,932 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Self Administration Transaction working capital true-up |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
493,785 |
|
|
|
493,785 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholder servicing fee(1) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
675,049 |
|
|
|
1,944,991 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
667,651 |
|
|
|
1,277,340 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
12,927,373 |
|
|
$ |
13,689,440 |
|
|
$ |
2,203,837 |
|
|
$ |
8,720,375 |
|
|
$ |
9,646,872 |
|
|
$ |
1,277,340 |
|
(1) |
We pay our Dealer Manager an ongoing stockholder servicing fee that is payable monthly and accrues daily in an amount equal to 1/365th of 1% of the purchase price per share of the Class T Shares sold in the Primary Offering. |
Please see Note 3 – Real Estate Facilities and Note 4 – Self Administration Transaction for detail regarding additional related party transactions.
Tenant Programs
We may offer a tenant insurance plan, tenant protection plan or similar program (collectively “Tenant Programs”) to customers at our properties. We and an affiliate of our Former External Property Manager previously agreed to transfer our respective rights in such Tenant Programs revenue to a joint venture owned 50% by our TRS subsidiary and, through the date of the Self Administration Transaction, 50% by our Former External Property Manager’s affiliate (the “Former PM Affiliate”). Under the terms of the joint venture agreement, the TRS received 50% of the net economics generated from such Tenant Programs and the Former PM Affiliate received the other 50% of such net economics. In addition, we share equally in the net revenue attributable to the sale of Tenant Programs at the properties we acquired in the SSGT Mergers on substantially similar terms as set forth above. In connection with the Self Administration Transaction we now wholly-own both such Tenant Programs joint venture entities.
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we recorded net revenues of approximately $2.9 million, $1.5 million, and $0.3 million, respectively, related to Tenant Programs which was included in ancillary operating revenue in the consolidated statements of operations.
Storage Auction Program
In connection with the Self Administration Transaction we now own a minority interest in a company that owns 50% of an online auction company (the “Auction Company”) that serves as a web portal for self storage companies to post their auctions for the contents of abandoned storage units online instead of using live auctions conducted at the self storage facilities. The Auction Company receives a service fee for such services. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 we paid approximately $45,000, $43,000, and none, respectively, in fees to the Auction Company related to our properties. Our properties receive the proceeds from such online auctions.
F-46
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Toronto Merger
On February 1, 2017, we entered into a definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Toronto Merger Agreement”) pursuant to which SST II Toronto Acquisition, LLC, a wholly owned and newly formed subsidiary of our Operating Partnership, merged (the “Toronto Merger”) with and into SS Toronto, a subsidiary of our Sponsor, with SS Toronto surviving the Toronto Merger and becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of our Operating Partnership. In connection with the Toronto Merger, we acquired five self storage properties located in the Greater Toronto Areas of North York, Mississauga, Brampton, Pickering and Scarborough (the “SS Toronto Properties”). Each property is operated under the “SmartStop” brand.
At the effective time of the Toronto Merger, each share of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, of SS Toronto issued and outstanding was automatically converted into the right to receive $11.0651 USD in cash and 0.7311 Class A Units of our Operating Partnership. We paid an aggregate of approximately $7.3 million USD in cash consideration and issued an aggregate of approximately 483,197 Class A Units of our Operating Partnership to the common stockholders of SS Toronto, consisting of Strategic 1031 and SS Toronto REIT Advisors, Inc., affiliates of our Sponsor. We acquired the SS Toronto Properties subject to approximately $50.1 million CAD (approximately $38.4 million USD) in outstanding debt (as described further below), approximately $0.8 million in other net liabilities, and paid approximately $33.1 million USD to an affiliate of Extra Space as repayment of outstanding debt and accrued interest owed by SS Toronto. No acquisition fee was paid to our Advisor for the Toronto Merger.
The terms of the Toronto Merger and the execution of the Toronto Merger Agreement were recommended by a special committee (the “Special Committee”) of our board of directors consisting of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the members of which were all of our independent directors. The Special Committee, with the assistance of its independent financial advisor and independent legal counsel, approved the transaction and determined that the Toronto Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Toronto Merger Agreement were advisable and in the best interests of us, were fair and reasonable to us and were on terms and conditions not less favorable to us than those available from unaffiliated third parties.
In connection with the Toronto Merger, we entered into guarantees, dated as of February 1, 2017 (the “Guarantees”), under which we agreed to guarantee certain obligations of SS Toronto. The SS Toronto loans consist of (i) term loans totaling approximately $34.8 million CAD pursuant to promissory notes executed by SS Toronto in favor of Bank of Montreal on June 3, 2016, and (ii) mortgage financings in the aggregate amount of up to $17.7 million CAD pursuant to two promissory notes executed by subsidiaries of SS Toronto in favor of DUCA Financial Services Credit Union Ltd. on June 3, 2016. These loans were paid off in full on October 11, 2018 in conjunction with the Canadian CitiBank loan. Please see Note 6 for more information.
Acquisition of Self Storage Platform from SmartStop Asset Management, LLC and Other Transactions
As a result of the Self Administration Transaction, the advisor and property manager entities of SST IV and SSGT II, became our indirect subsidiaries. As a result, we are entitled to receive various fees and expense reimbursements under the terms of the SST IV and SSGT II advisory and property management agreements as described below.
Advisory Agreement Fees
Our indirect subsidiaries, Strategic Storage Advisor IV, LLC, the advisor to SST IV (the “SST IV Advisor”), and SS Growth Advisor II, LLC, the advisor to SSGT II (the “SSGT II Advisor”), are entitled to receive various fees and expense reimbursements under the terms of the SST IV and SSGT II advisory agreements.
F-47
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
SST IV Advisory Agreement
The SST IV Advisor provides acquisition and advisory services to SST IV pursuant to an advisory agreement (the “SST IV Advisory Agreement”). SST IV is required to reimburse SST IV Advisor for organization and offering costs under the SST IV Advisory Agreement; however, the SST IV Advisor funds, and will not be reimbursed for 1.15% of the gross offering proceeds from the sale of class W shares sold in the SST IV offering. Such amounts for the year ended December 31, 2019 totaled approximately $41,000. The SST IV Advisor will be required to reimburse SST IV within 60 days after the end of the month in which the SST IV public offering terminates to the extent SST IV paid or reimbursed organization and offering costs (excluding sales commissions and dealer manager fees) in excess of 3.5% of the gross offering proceeds from the SST IV offering. The SST IV Advisory Agreement also requires the SST IV Advisor to reimburse SST IV to the extent that offering expenses, including sales commissions, dealer manager fees and organization and offering expenses, are in excess of 15% of gross proceeds from the SST IV offering.
The SST IV Advisor also receives a monthly asset management fee equal to 0.0833%, which is one-twelfth of 1%, of SST IV’s aggregate asset value, as defined.
The SST IV Advisor may potentially also be entitled to various subordinated distributions under the SST IV’s operating partnership agreement pursuant to the special limited partnership interest and its cash flow participation distribution rights if SST IV (1) lists its shares of common stock on a national exchange, (2) terminates the SST IV Advisory Agreement, (3) liquidates its portfolio, or (4) enters into an Extraordinary Transaction, as defined in the SST IV operating partnership agreement.
The SST IV Advisory Agreement provides for reimbursement of the SST IV Advisor’s direct and indirect costs of providing administrative and management services to SST IV. The SST IV Advisor will be required to pay or reimburse SST IV the amount by which SST IV’s aggregate annual operating expenses, as defined, exceed the greater of 2% of SST IV’s average invested assets or 25% of SST IV’s net income, as defined, unless a majority of SST IV’s independent directors determine that such excess expenses were justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors.
SSGT II Advisory Agreement
The SSGT II Advisor provides acquisition and advisory services to SSGT II pursuant to an advisory agreement (the “SSGT II Advisory Agreement”). In connection with the SSGT II private placement offering, SSGT II is required to reimburse the SSGT II Advisor for organization and offering costs from the SSGT II private offering pursuant to the SSGT II Advisory Agreement.
The SSGT II Advisor will receive a monthly asset management fee equal to 0.1042%, which is one-twelfth of 1.25%, of SSGT II’s aggregate asset value, as defined.
The SSGT II Advisor may also be potentially entitled to various subordinated distributions under SSGT II’s operating partnership agreement pursuant to the special limited partnership interest and its cash flow participation distribution rights. So long as the SSGT II Advisory Agreement has not been terminated (including by means of non-renewal), SSGT II is required to pay the SSGT II Advisor a distribution from its operating partnership (other than net sale proceeds), pursuant to a special limited partnership interest, equal to 10.0% of any amount distributed to stockholders in excess of the amount required to provide stockholders with an annual aggregate distribution equal to 5.0% (reflective of the weighted average purchase price per share), cumulative within the subject calendar year (as adjusted for partial periods outstanding). Such distribution will be reconciled and paid annually. The cash flow participation distribution may be payable in cash or operating partnership units (or any combination thereof), at the election of the SSGT II Advisor.
The SSGT II Advisor may also be potentially entitled to various subordinated distributions under SSGT II’s operating partnership agreement if SSGT II (1) lists its shares of common stock on a national exchange, (2) terminates the SSGT II Advisory Agreement, (3) liquidates its portfolio, or (4) merges with another entity or enters into an Extraordinary Transaction, as defined in the SSGT II operating partnership agreement.
The SSGT II Advisory Agreement provides for reimbursement of the SSGT II Advisor’s direct and indirect costs of providing administrative and management services to SSGT II.
F-48
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Property Management Agreements
Our indirect subsidiaries, Strategic Storage Property Management IV, LLC and SS Growth Property Management II, LLC (collectively the “Managed REITs Property Managers”), are entitled to receive fees for their services in managing the properties owned by the Managed REITs pursuant to property management agreements entered into between the owner of the property and the applicable Managed REIT’s Property Manager. The Managed REIT’s Property Managers will receive a property management fee equal to 6% of the gross revenues from the properties, generally subject to a monthly minimum of $3,000 per property, plus reimbursement of the costs of managing the properties, and a one-time fee of $3,750 for each property acquired that would be managed by the Managed REITs Property Managers. Reimbursable costs and expenses include wages and salaries and other expenses of employees engaged in operating, managing and maintaining such properties. Pursuant to the property management agreements, we through our Operating Partnership employ the on-site staff for the Managed REITs’ properties.
The SST IV property manager will be entitled to a construction management fee equal to 5% of the cost of a related construction or capital improvement work project in excess of $10,000.
Summary of Fees and Revenue Related to the Managed REITs
Pursuant to the terms of the various agreements described above for the Managed REITs, the following summarizes the related party fees for year ended December 31, 2019:
Managed REIT Platform Revenues |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
|
|
Advisory agreement – SST IV |
|
$ |
1,153,137 |
|
Property management agreement – SST IV |
|
|
602,162 |
|
Tenant Program revenue – SST IV |
|
|
254,148 |
|
Advisory agreement – SSGT II |
|
|
310,786 |
|
Property management agreement – SSGT II |
|
|
91,594 |
|
Tenant Program revenue – SSGT II |
|
|
37,269 |
|
Other Managed REIT revenue (1) |
|
|
619,210 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,068,306 |
|
(1) |
Such revenues primarily includes construction management, development, and acquisitions related fees. |
Reimbursable costs from affiliates includes reimbursement of both the SST IV and SSGT II Advisors’ direct and indirect costs of providing administrative and management services to the Managed REITs. Additionally, reimbursable costs includes reimbursement pursuant to the property management agreements for reimbursement of the costs of managing the Managed REITs’ properties, including wages and salaries and other expenses of employees engaged in operating, managing and maintaining such properties.
As of December 31, 2019 we had receivables due from SST IV and SSGT II totaling approximately $100,000 and $170,000 respectively, which are included in investments in and advances to the Managed REITs line-item in our consolidated balance sheet. Such amounts included unpaid amounts relative to the above table, in addition to other direct routine expenditures of the Managed REITs that we directly funded.
F-49
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Administrative Services Agreement
In connection with the Self Administration Transaction, on June 28, 2019, we along with our Operating Partnership, the TRS and SSA (collectively, the “Company Parties”) entered into an Administrative Services Agreement with SAM (the “Administrative Services Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company Parties will be reimbursed for providing certain operational and administrative services to SAM which may include, without limitation, accounting and financial support, IT support, HR support, advisory services and operations support, and administrative support as set forth in the Administrative Services Agreement and SAM will be reimbursed for providing certain operational and administrative services to the Company Parties which may include, without limitation, due diligence support, marketing, fulfillment and offering support, events support, insurance support, and administrative and facilities support. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we incurred fees to SAM under the Administrative Services Agreement of approximately $2.1 million, which were recorded in our Managed REIT Platform expenses in our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2019, and recorded reimbursements of approximately $0.2 million, which were included in Managed REIT Platform revenue in our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2019. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded reimbursements from SAM of approximately $0.1 million to the Company Parties as an allocation of rent and overhead for the portion of our Ladera Office occupied by SAM. As of December 31, 2019, approximately $0.3 million was included in due to affiliates on our consolidated balance sheet for amounts we owed SAM.
Note 11. Stock Based Compensation
We issue stock based compensation pursuant to the employee and director long-term incentive plan of SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc. (the “Plan”). Pursuant to the Plan, we are able to issue various forms of stock based compensation. Through December 31, 2019 we had only issued restricted stock grants, which are subject to a vesting period over which the restrictions are released and the stock is issued in book entry form to the grantee. During the vesting period, the grantee is not permitted to sell, transfer, pledge, encumber or assign shares of non-vested restricted stock granted under the Plan and the grantee does not have the ability to vote the shares. Any dividends accrued on non-vested shares will be paid, if and when the underlying restricted shares vest. Generally the shares vest over an approximate
period which begins on the date of grant.As of December 31, 2019, 5,630,071 shares were available for issuance under the Plan.
We recorded approximately $405,000 of expense in general and administrative expense in our consolidated statements of operations related to restricted stock granted to employees and directors for the year ended December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2019, there was approximately $2.2 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested restricted stock awards. Such cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.9 years.
Restricted Stock Grants |
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value |
|
||
Non-Vested at December 31, 2018 |
|
|
21,438 |
|
|
$ |
10.38 |
|
Granted |
|
|
251,993 |
|
|
|
9.48 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(7,625 |
) |
|
|
10.29 |
|
Non-Vested at December 31, 2019 |
|
|
265,806 |
|
|
$ |
9.53 |
|
Note 12. Commitments and Contingencies
Distribution Reinvestment Plan
We have adopted an amended and restated distribution reinvestment plan that allows both our Class A and Class T stockholders to have distributions otherwise distributable to them invested in additional shares of our Class A and Class T Shares, respectively. The purchase price per share pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan is equivalent to the estimated value per share approved by our board of directors and in effect on the date of purchase of shares under the plan. In conjunction with the board of directors’ declaration of a new estimated value per share of our common stock on June 26, 2019, beginning in July 2019, shares sold pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan are sold at the estimated value per share of $10.66 per Class A Share and Class T Share. On November 30, 2016, we filed with the SEC a Registration Statement on Form S-3, which registered up to an additional $100.9 million in shares under our distribution reinvestment plan (our “DRP Offering”). We may amend or terminate the amended and restated distribution reinvestment plan for any reason at any time upon 10 days’ prior written notice to stockholders. No sales commissions, dealer manager fee, or
F-50
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
stockholder servicing fee will be paid on shares sold through the amended and restated distribution reinvestment plan. Through the termination of our Offering on January 9, 2017, we had sold approximately 1.1 million Class A shares and 0.1 million Class T Shares through our original distribution reinvestment plan. As of December 31, 2019, we had sold approximately 4.0 million Class A Shares and approximately 0.6 million Class T Shares through our DRP Offering.
Share Redemption Program
We adopted a share redemption program that enables stockholders to sell their shares to us in limited circumstances. On August 26, 2019, our board of directors approved the suspension of our share redemption program effective as of September 27, 2019, except with respect to redemption requests made in connection with the death or disability of a stockholder, redemption due to confinement to a long-term care facility, or other exigent circumstances. We may redeem the shares of stock presented for redemption for cash to the extent that such requests comply with the foregoing terms of our share redemption program and we have sufficient funds available to fund such redemption. We are not obligated to redeem shares under the share redemption program.
Our board of directors may amend, suspend or terminate the share redemption program with 30 days’ notice to our stockholders. We may provide this notice by including such information in a Current Report on Form 8-K or in our annual or quarterly reports, all publicly filed with the SEC, or by a separate mailing to our stockholders.
The amount that we may pay to redeem stock for redemptions is the redemption price set forth in the following table which is based upon the number of years the stock is held:
Number Years Held |
|
Redemption Price |
Less than 1 |
|
No Redemption Allowed |
1 or more but less than 3 |
|
90.0% of Redemption Amount |
3 or more but less than 4 |
|
95.0% of Redemption Amount |
4 or more |
|
100.0% of Redemption Amount |
At any time we are engaged in an offering of shares, the Redemption Amount for shares purchased under our share redemption program will always be equal to or lower than the applicable per share offering price. As long as we are engaged in an offering, the Redemption Amount shall be the lesser of the amount the stockholder paid for their shares or the price per share in the current offering. If we are no longer engaged in an offering, our board of directors will announce any redemption price adjustment and the time period of its effectiveness as a part of its regular communications with our stockholders. At any time the redemption price during an offering is determined by any method other than the offering price, if we have sold property and have made one or more special distributions to our stockholders of all or a portion of the net proceeds from such sales, the per share redemption price will be reduced by the net sale proceeds per share distributed to investors prior to the redemption date as a result of the sale of such property in the special distribution. Our board of directors will, in its sole discretion, determine which distributions, if any, constitute a special distribution. While our board of directors does not have specific criteria for determining a special distribution, we expect that a special distribution will only occur upon the sale of a property and the subsequent distribution of the net sale proceeds.
There are several limitations in addition to those noted above on our ability to redeem shares under the share redemption program including, but not limited to:
|
• |
During any calendar year, we will not redeem in excess of 5% of the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the prior calendar year. |
|
• |
The cash available for redemption is limited to the proceeds from the sale of shares pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, less any prior redemptions. |
F-51
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
|
• |
We have no obligation to redeem shares if the redemption would violate the restrictions on distributions under Maryland law, which prohibits distributions that would cause a corporation to fail to meet statutory tests of solvency. |
For the year ended December 31, 2019, we received redemption requests totaling approximately $4.9 million (approximately 0.5 million shares), approximately $4.5 million of which were fulfilled during the year ended December 31, 2019, with the remaining approximately $0.4 million included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2019 and fulfilled in January 2020. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we received redemption requests totaling approximately $8.3 million (approximately 0.9 million shares), approximately $7.0 million of which were fulfilled during year ended December 31, 2018, with the remaining approximately $1.3 million included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2018 and fulfilled in January 2019. For the year ended December 31, 2017 we received redemption requests totaling approximately $2.2 million (approximately 0.2 million shares), approximately $1.5 million of which were fulfilled during year ended December 31, 2017, with the remaining approximately $0.7 million included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2017 and fulfilled in January 2018.
Operating Partnership Redemption Rights
Generally, the limited partners of our Operating Partnership, excluding any limited partners with respect to their A-2 Units, have the right to cause our Operating Partnership to redeem their limited partnership units for cash equal to the value of an equivalent number of our shares, or, at our option, we may purchase their limited partnership units by issuing one share of our common stock for each limited partnership unit redeemed. These rights may not be exercised under certain circumstances that could cause us to lose our REIT election. Furthermore, limited partners may exercise their redemption rights only after their limited partnership units have been outstanding for one year.
Additionally, the Class A-1 Units issued in connection with the Self Administration Transaction are subject to the general restrictions on transfer contained in the Operating Partnership Agreement. In addition, until the Lock-Up Expiration, the Class A-1 Units may not be sold, pledged, or otherwise transferred or encumbered except in certain limited circumstances set forth in the Contribution Agreement. The Class A-1 Units are otherwise entitled to all rights and duties of the Class A limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership, including cash distributions and the allocation of any profits or losses in the Operating Partnership.
Other Contingencies
From time to time, we are party to legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We are not aware of any legal proceedings of which the outcome is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition, nor are we aware of any such legal proceedings contemplated by governmental authorities
Note 13. Declaration of Distributions
On December 18, 2019, our board of directors declared a distribution rate for the first quarter of 2020 of $0.001639 per day per share on the outstanding shares of common stock payable to both Class A and Class T stockholders of record of such shares as shown on our books at the close of business on each day during the period, commencing on January 1, 2020 and continuing on each day thereafter through and including March 31, 2020. In connection with this distribution, after the stockholder servicing fee is paid, approximately $0.0014 per day will be paid per Class T share. Such distributions payable to each stockholder of record during a month will be paid the following month.
F-52
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Note 14. Selected Quarterly Data (Unaudited)
The following is a summary of quarterly financial information for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
March 31, 2019 |
|
|
June 30, 2019 |
|
|
September 30, 2019 |
|
|
December 31, 2019 |
|
||||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
23,883,325 |
|
|
$ |
25,980,517 |
|
|
$ |
29,588,014 |
|
|
$ |
30,076,693 |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
21,934,203 |
|
|
$ |
25,211,611 |
|
|
$ |
27,773,486 |
|
|
$ |
26,965,933 |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
1,949,122 |
|
|
$ |
768,906 |
|
|
$ |
1,814,528 |
|
|
$ |
7,055,456 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(8,948,317 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,283,972 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,541,579 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,321,670 |
) |
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(8,891,558 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,212,445 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,214,826 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,431,504 |
) |
Net loss per Class A Share-basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
Net loss per Class T Share-basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
March 31, 2018 |
|
|
June 30, 2018 |
|
|
September 30, 2018 |
|
|
December 31, 2018 |
|
||||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
19,866,457 |
|
|
$ |
20,045,516 |
|
|
$ |
20,313,069 |
|
|
$ |
20,187,215 |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
16,010,116 |
|
|
$ |
16,605,713 |
|
|
$ |
15,836,436 |
|
|
$ |
15,808,549 |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
3,856,341 |
|
|
$ |
3,439,803 |
|
|
$ |
4,476,633 |
|
|
$ |
4,378,666 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(667,047 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,437,330 |
) |
|
$ |
(457,278 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,159,075 |
) |
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(661,203 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,427,056 |
) |
|
$ |
(451,424 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,158,694 |
) |
Net loss per Class A Share-basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
Net loss per Class T Share-basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
Note 15. Subsequent Events
Distribution Reinvestment Plan Offering Status
As of March 25, 2020, in connection with our DRP Offering, we had issued approximately 4.3 million Class A Shares of our common stock and approximately 0.7 million Class T Shares of our common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $45.2 million and approximately $6.9 million, respectively.
Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update
In December 2019, COVID-19 emerged in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. While initially the outbreak was largely concentrated in China and caused significant disruptions to its economy, it has now spread to many other countries and infections have been reported globally, including in the United States and in the markets in which we operate. Our rental revenue and operating results depend significantly on the demand for self storage space. We have not seen a significant impact on the demand for self storage space resulting from the COVID-19 outbreak as of the date of this report. Concerns relating to COVID-19 could also impact the availability of our personnel to report for work at our facilities, which could adversely affect our ability to adequately manage our facilities. Furthermore, in order to prevent the spread of COVID-19 there have been, and may continue to be, temporary shut downs or restrictions placed on businesses by cities, counties, states, or the federal government. These orders have impacted, and may continue to impact, our facilities and operations. The outbreak and the resulting effects, including weakness in national, regional and local economies that negatively impact the demand for self storage space and the fees we earn from the Managed REITs, could adversely impact our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
F-53
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company |
|
|
Gross Carrying Amount at December 31, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description |
|
ST |
|
Encumbrance |
|
|
Land |
|
|
Building and Improvements |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |
|
|
Land |
|
|
Building and Improvements |
|
|
Total(1) |
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation |
|
|
Date of Construction |
|
Date Acquired |
|||||||||
Morrisville |
|
NC |
|
$ |
3,109,374 |
|
|
$ |
531,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,891,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,422,000 |
|
|
$ |
111,669 |
|
|
$ |
531,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,002,669 |
|
|
$ |
2,533,669 |
|
|
$ |
402,431 |
|
|
2004 |
|
11/3/2014 |
Cary |
|
NC |
|
|
5,289,973 |
|
|
|
1,064,000 |
|
|
|
3,301,000 |
|
|
|
4,365,000 |
|
|
|
104,393 |
|
|
|
1,064,000 |
|
|
|
3,405,393 |
|
|
|
4,469,393 |
|
|
|
650,300 |
|
|
1998/2005/2006 |
|
11/3/2014 |
Raleigh |
|
NC |
|
|
4,482,344 |
|
|
|
1,186,000 |
|
|
|
2,540,000 |
|
|
|
3,726,000 |
|
|
|
206,819 |
|
|
|
1,186,000 |
|
|
|
2,746,819 |
|
|
|
3,932,819 |
|
|
|
615,086 |
|
|
1999 |
|
11/3/2014 |
Myrtle Beach I |
|
SC |
|
|
8,606,670 |
|
|
|
1,482,000 |
|
|
|
4,476,000 |
|
|
|
5,958,000 |
|
|
|
339,706 |
|
|
|
1,482,000 |
|
|
|
4,815,706 |
|
|
|
6,297,706 |
|
|
|
947,514 |
|
|
1998/2005-2007 |
|
11/3/2014 |
Myrtle Beach II |
|
SC |
|
|
6,970,422 |
|
|
|
1,690,000 |
|
|
|
3,654,000 |
|
|
|
5,344,000 |
|
|
|
216,056 |
|
|
|
1,690,000 |
|
|
|
3,870,056 |
|
|
|
5,560,056 |
|
|
|
793,377 |
|
|
1999/2006 |
|
11/3/2014 |
Whittier |
|
CA |
|
|
4,602,761 |
|
|
|
2,730,000 |
|
|
|
2,916,875 |
|
|
|
5,646,875 |
|
|
|
419,262 |
|
|
|
2,730,000 |
|
|
|
3,336,137 |
|
|
|
6,066,137 |
|
|
|
692,786 |
|
|
1989 |
|
2/19/2015 |
La Verne |
|
CA |
|
|
3,167,492 |
|
|
|
1,950,000 |
|
|
|
2,036,875 |
|
|
|
3,986,875 |
|
|
|
291,367 |
|
|
|
1,950,000 |
|
|
|
2,328,242 |
|
|
|
4,278,242 |
|
|
|
516,456 |
|
|
1986 |
|
1/23/2015 |
Santa Ana |
|
CA |
|
|
5,196,666 |
|
|
|
4,890,000 |
|
|
|
4,006,875 |
|
|
|
8,896,875 |
|
|
|
308,327 |
|
|
|
4,890,000 |
|
|
|
4,315,202 |
|
|
|
9,205,202 |
|
|
|
931,310 |
|
|
1978 |
|
2/5/2015 |
Upland |
|
CA |
|
|
3,612,920 |
|
|
|
2,950,000 |
|
|
|
3,016,875 |
|
|
|
5,966,875 |
|
|
|
400,245 |
|
|
|
2,950,000 |
|
|
|
3,417,120 |
|
|
|
6,367,120 |
|
|
|
753,589 |
|
|
1979 |
|
1/29/2015 |
La Habra |
|
CA |
|
|
3,662,412 |
|
|
|
2,060,000 |
|
|
|
2,356,875 |
|
|
|
4,416,875 |
|
|
|
303,463 |
|
|
|
2,060,000 |
|
|
|
2,660,338 |
|
|
|
4,720,338 |
|
|
|
518,792 |
|
|
1981 |
|
2/5/2015 |
Monterey Park |
|
CA |
|
|
2,573,587 |
|
|
|
2,020,000 |
|
|
|
2,216,875 |
|
|
|
4,236,875 |
|
|
|
210,031 |
|
|
|
2,020,000 |
|
|
|
2,426,906 |
|
|
|
4,446,906 |
|
|
|
483,171 |
|
|
1987 |
|
2/5/2015 |
Huntington Beach |
|
CA |
|
|
6,978,379 |
|
|
|
5,460,000 |
|
|
|
4,856,875 |
|
|
|
10,316,875 |
|
|
|
420,732 |
|
|
|
5,460,000 |
|
|
|
5,277,607 |
|
|
|
10,737,607 |
|
|
|
1,048,530 |
|
|
1986 |
|
2/5/2015 |
Chico |
|
CA |
|
|
1,163,063 |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
1,336,875 |
|
|
|
1,736,875 |
|
|
|
227,225 |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
1,564,100 |
|
|
|
1,964,100 |
|
|
|
338,409 |
|
|
1984 |
|
1/23/2015 |
Lancaster |
|
CA |
|
|
1,682,730 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
1,516,875 |
|
|
|
1,716,875 |
|
|
|
326,487 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
1,843,362 |
|
|
|
2,043,362 |
|
|
|
429,551 |
|
|
1980 |
|
1/29/2015 |
Riverside |
|
CA |
|
|
2,326,127 |
|
|
|
370,000 |
|
|
|
2,326,875 |
|
|
|
2,696,875 |
|
|
|
443,806 |
|
|
|
370,000 |
|
|
|
2,770,681 |
|
|
|
3,140,681 |
|
|
|
559,516 |
|
|
1985 |
|
1/23/2015 |
Fairfield |
|
CA |
|
|
2,746,809 |
|
|
|
730,000 |
|
|
|
2,946,875 |
|
|
|
3,676,875 |
|
|
|
99,100 |
|
|
|
730,000 |
|
|
|
3,045,975 |
|
|
|
3,775,975 |
|
|
|
616,798 |
|
|
1984 |
|
1/23/2015 |
Lompoc |
|
CA |
|
|
2,821,047 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
2,746,875 |
|
|
|
3,746,875 |
|
|
|
150,688 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
2,897,563 |
|
|
|
3,897,563 |
|
|
|
576,227 |
|
|
1982 |
|
2/5/2015 |
Santa Rosa |
|
CA |
|
|
7,324,823 |
|
|
|
3,150,000 |
|
|
|
6,716,875 |
|
|
|
9,866,875 |
|
|
|
369,705 |
|
|
|
3,150,000 |
|
|
|
7,086,580 |
|
|
|
10,236,580 |
|
|
|
1,393,470 |
|
|
1979-1981 |
|
1/29/2015 |
Vallejo |
|
CA |
|
|
8,237,821 |
|
|
|
990,000 |
|
|
|
3,946,875 |
|
|
|
4,936,875 |
|
|
|
173,697 |
|
|
|
990,000 |
|
|
|
4,120,572 |
|
|
|
5,110,572 |
|
|
|
824,942 |
|
|
1981 |
|
1/29/2015 |
Federal Heights |
|
CO |
|
|
2,375,619 |
|
|
|
1,100,000 |
|
|
|
3,346,875 |
|
|
|
4,446,875 |
|
|
|
344,130 |
|
|
|
1,100,000 |
|
|
|
3,691,005 |
|
|
|
4,791,005 |
|
|
|
833,053 |
|
|
1983 |
|
1/29/2015 |
Aurora |
|
CO |
|
|
4,800,729 |
|
|
|
810,000 |
|
|
|
5,906,875 |
|
|
|
6,716,875 |
|
|
|
500,621 |
|
|
|
810,000 |
|
|
|
6,407,496 |
|
|
|
7,217,496 |
|
|
|
1,256,353 |
|
|
1984 |
|
2/5/2015 |
Littleton |
|
CO |
|
|
2,177,650 |
|
|
|
1,680,000 |
|
|
|
2,456,875 |
|
|
|
4,136,875 |
|
|
|
281,681 |
|
|
|
1,680,000 |
|
|
|
2,738,556 |
|
|
|
4,418,556 |
|
|
|
569,293 |
|
|
1985 |
|
1/23/2015 |
Bloomingdale |
|
IL |
|
|
2,375,619 |
|
|
|
810,000 |
|
|
|
3,856,874 |
|
|
|
4,666,874 |
|
|
|
292,022 |
|
|
|
810,000 |
|
|
|
4,148,896 |
|
|
|
4,958,896 |
|
|
|
808,741 |
|
|
1987 |
|
2/19/2015 |
Crestwood |
|
IL |
|
|
1,633,238 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
2,096,875 |
|
|
|
2,346,875 |
|
|
|
289,225 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
2,386,100 |
|
|
|
2,636,100 |
|
|
|
500,125 |
|
|
1987 |
|
1/23/2015 |
Forestville |
|
MD |
|
|
3,464,444 |
|
|
|
1,940,000 |
|
|
|
4,346,875 |
|
|
|
6,286,875 |
|
|
|
916,799 |
|
|
|
1,940,000 |
|
|
|
5,263,674 |
|
|
|
7,203,674 |
|
|
|
1,170,978 |
|
|
1988 |
|
1/23/2015 |
Warren I |
|
MI |
|
|
1,954,936 |
|
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
|
2,966,875 |
|
|
|
3,196,875 |
|
|
|
414,426 |
|
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
|
3,381,301 |
|
|
|
3,611,301 |
|
|
|
661,863 |
|
|
1996 |
|
5/8/2015 |
Sterling Heights |
|
MI |
|
|
2,301,381 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
3,286,875 |
|
|
|
3,536,875 |
|
|
|
687,046 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
3,973,921 |
|
|
|
4,223,921 |
|
|
|
738,112 |
|
|
1977 |
|
5/21/2015 |
Troy |
|
MI |
|
|
3,414,952 |
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
|
4,176,875 |
|
|
|
4,416,875 |
|
|
|
223,434 |
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
|
4,400,309 |
|
|
|
4,640,309 |
|
|
|
838,838 |
|
|
1988 |
|
5/8/2015 |
Warren II |
|
MI |
|
|
2,251,889 |
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
|
3,066,875 |
|
|
|
3,306,875 |
|
|
|
647,801 |
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
|
3,714,676 |
|
|
|
3,954,676 |
|
|
|
751,865 |
|
|
1987 |
|
5/8/2015 |
Beverly |
|
NJ |
|
|
1,385,778 |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
1,696,875 |
|
|
|
2,096,875 |
|
|
|
280,370 |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
1,977,245 |
|
|
|
2,377,245 |
|
|
|
345,453 |
|
|
1988 |
|
5/28/2015 |
Everett |
|
WA |
|
|
2,722,063 |
|
|
|
2,010,000 |
|
|
|
2,956,875 |
|
|
|
4,966,875 |
|
|
|
592,662 |
|
|
|
2,010,000 |
|
|
|
3,549,537 |
|
|
|
5,559,537 |
|
|
|
682,138 |
|
|
1986 |
|
2/5/2015 |
Foley |
|
AL |
|
|
4,132,587 |
|
|
|
1,839,000 |
|
|
|
5,717,000 |
|
|
|
7,556,000 |
|
|
|
597,640 |
|
|
|
1,839,000 |
|
|
|
6,314,640 |
|
|
|
8,153,640 |
|
|
|
1,133,176 |
|
|
1985/1996/2006 |
|
9/11/2015 |
Tampa |
|
FL |
|
|
1,633,238 |
|
|
|
718,244 |
|
|
|
2,257,471 |
|
|
|
2,975,715 |
|
|
|
544,520 |
|
|
|
718,244 |
|
|
|
2,801,991 |
|
|
|
3,520,235 |
|
|
|
465,819 |
|
|
1985 |
|
11/3/2015 |
Boynton Beach |
|
FL |
|
|
8,166,188 |
|
|
|
1,983,491 |
|
|
|
15,232,817 |
|
|
|
17,216,308 |
|
|
|
401,381 |
|
|
|
1,983,491 |
|
|
|
15,634,198 |
|
|
|
17,617,689 |
|
|
|
1,903,280 |
|
|
2004 |
|
1/7/2016 |
Lancaster II |
|
CA |
|
|
2,350,873 |
|
|
|
670,392 |
|
|
|
3,711,424 |
|
|
|
4,381,816 |
|
|
|
234,616 |
|
|
|
670,392 |
|
|
|
3,946,040 |
|
|
|
4,616,432 |
|
|
|
619,503 |
|
|
1991 |
|
1/11/2016 |
Milton(2) |
|
ONT |
|
|
5,941,133 |
|
|
|
1,452,870 |
|
|
|
7,929,810 |
|
|
|
9,382,680 |
|
|
|
935,627 |
|
(3) |
|
1,551,187 |
|
|
|
8,767,120 |
|
|
|
10,318,307 |
|
|
|
1,024,658 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2/11/2016 |
Burlington I(2) |
|
ONT |
|
|
9,471,372 |
|
|
|
3,293,267 |
|
|
|
10,278,861 |
|
|
|
13,572,128 |
|
|
|
1,161,001 |
|
(3) |
|
3,516,127 |
|
|
|
11,217,002 |
|
|
|
14,733,129 |
|
|
|
1,343,310 |
|
|
2011 |
|
2/11/2016 |
Oakville I(2) |
|
ONT |
|
|
6,543,857 |
|
|
|
2,655,215 |
|
|
|
13,072,458 |
|
|
|
15,727,673 |
|
|
|
2,989,499 |
|
(3) |
|
2,834,896 |
|
|
|
15,882,276 |
|
|
|
18,717,172 |
|
|
|
1,933,514 |
|
|
2016 |
|
2/11/2016 |
Oakville II(2) |
|
ONT |
|
|
7,663,201 |
|
|
|
2,983,307 |
|
|
|
9,346,283 |
|
|
|
12,329,590 |
|
|
|
707,360 |
|
(3) |
|
3,097,623 |
|
|
|
9,939,327 |
|
|
|
13,036,950 |
|
|
|
1,218,853 |
|
|
2004 |
|
2/29/2016 |
Burlington II(2) |
|
ONT |
|
|
4,735,686 |
|
|
|
2,944,035 |
|
|
|
5,125,839 |
|
|
|
8,069,874 |
|
|
|
507,540 |
|
(3) |
|
3,056,847 |
|
|
|
5,520,567 |
|
|
|
8,577,414 |
|
|
|
663,864 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2/29/2016 |
Xenia |
|
OH |
|
|
2,705,559 |
|
|
|
275,493 |
|
|
|
2,664,693 |
|
|
|
2,940,186 |
|
|
|
26,364 |
|
|
|
275,493 |
|
|
|
2,691,057 |
|
|
|
2,966,550 |
|
|
|
400,301 |
|
|
2003 |
|
4/20/2016 |
Sidney |
|
OH |
|
|
1,817,166 |
|
|
|
255,246 |
|
|
|
1,806,349 |
|
|
|
2,061,595 |
|
|
|
106,739 |
|
|
|
255,246 |
|
|
|
1,913,088 |
|
|
|
2,168,334 |
|
|
|
415,302 |
|
|
2003 |
|
4/20/2016 |
S-1
Troy |
|
OH |
|
|
2,988,229 |
|
|
|
150,666 |
|
|
|
2,596,010 |
|
|
|
2,746,676 |
|
|
|
56,417 |
|
|
|
150,666 |
|
|
|
2,652,427 |
|
|
|
2,803,093 |
|
|
|
447,468 |
|
|
2003 |
|
4/20/2016 |
Greenville |
|
OH |
|
|
1,897,929 |
|
|
|
82,598 |
|
|
|
1,909,466 |
|
|
|
1,992,064 |
|
|
|
48,898 |
|
|
|
82,598 |
|
|
|
1,958,364 |
|
|
|
2,040,962 |
|
|
|
286,401 |
|
|
2003 |
|
4/20/2016 |
Washington Court House |
|
OH |
|
|
2,947,848 |
|
|
|
255,456 |
|
|
|
1,882,203 |
|
|
|
2,137,659 |
|
|
|
28,346 |
|
|
|
255,456 |
|
|
|
1,910,549 |
|
|
|
2,166,005 |
|
|
|
290,615 |
|
|
2003 |
|
4/20/2016 |
Richmond |
|
IN |
|
|
2,988,229 |
|
|
|
223,159 |
|
|
|
2,944,379 |
|
|
|
3,167,538 |
|
|
|
23,738 |
|
|
|
223,159 |
|
|
|
2,968,117 |
|
|
|
3,191,276 |
|
|
|
462,658 |
|
|
2003 |
|
4/20/2016 |
Connersville |
|
IN |
|
|
1,857,548 |
|
|
|
155,533 |
|
|
|
1,652,290 |
|
|
|
1,807,823 |
|
|
|
24,961 |
|
|
|
155,533 |
|
|
|
1,677,251 |
|
|
|
1,832,784 |
|
|
|
263,158 |
|
|
2003 |
|
4/20/2016 |
Port St. Lucie I |
|
FL |
|
|
7,430,191 |
|
|
|
2,589,781 |
|
|
|
6,339,578 |
|
|
|
8,929,359 |
|
|
|
135,087 |
|
|
|
2,589,781 |
|
|
|
6,474,665 |
|
|
|
9,064,446 |
|
|
|
845,185 |
|
|
1999 |
|
4/29/2016 |
Sacramento |
|
CA |
|
|
8,157,058 |
|
|
|
1,205,209 |
|
|
|
6,616,767 |
|
|
|
7,821,976 |
|
|
|
158,568 |
|
|
|
1,205,209 |
|
|
|
6,775,335 |
|
|
|
7,980,544 |
|
|
|
800,959 |
|
|
2006 |
|
5/9/2016 |
Oakland |
|
CA |
|
|
13,325,887 |
|
|
|
5,711,189 |
|
|
|
6,902,446 |
|
|
|
12,613,635 |
|
|
|
82,123 |
|
|
|
5,711,189 |
|
|
|
6,984,569 |
|
|
|
12,695,758 |
|
|
|
834,038 |
|
|
1979 |
|
5/18/2016 |
Concord |
|
CA |
|
|
32,628,233 |
|
|
|
19,090,003 |
|
|
|
17,202,868 |
|
|
|
36,292,871 |
|
|
|
144,116 |
|
|
|
19,090,003 |
|
|
|
17,346,984 |
|
|
|
36,436,987 |
|
|
|
2,138,426 |
|
|
1988/1998 |
|
5/18/2016 |
Pompano Beach |
|
FL |
|
|
8,590,310 |
|
|
|
3,947,715 |
|
|
|
16,656,002 |
|
|
|
20,603,717 |
|
|
|
154,178 |
|
|
|
3,947,715 |
|
|
|
16,810,180 |
|
|
|
20,757,895 |
|
|
|
1,797,481 |
|
|
1979 |
|
6/1/2016 |
Lake Worth |
|
FL |
|
|
10,308,370 |
|
|
|
12,108,208 |
|
|
|
10,804,173 |
|
|
|
22,912,381 |
|
|
|
149,355 |
|
|
|
12,108,208 |
|
|
|
10,953,528 |
|
|
|
23,061,736 |
|
|
|
1,626,503 |
|
|
1998/2003 |
|
6/1/2016 |
Jupiter |
|
FL |
|
|
11,568,280 |
|
|
|
16,029,881 |
|
|
|
10,556,833 |
|
|
|
26,586,714 |
|
|
|
215,037 |
|
|
|
16,029,881 |
|
|
|
10,771,870 |
|
|
|
26,801,751 |
|
|
|
1,330,037 |
|
|
1992/2012 |
|
6/1/2016 |
Royal Palm Beach |
|
FL |
|
|
9,678,415 |
|
|
|
11,425,394 |
|
|
|
13,275,322 |
|
|
|
24,700,716 |
|
|
|
73,709 |
|
|
|
11,425,394 |
|
|
|
13,349,031 |
|
|
|
24,774,425 |
|
|
|
1,871,748 |
|
|
2001/2003 |
|
6/1/2016 |
Port St. Lucie II |
|
FL |
|
|
7,264,947 |
|
|
|
5,130,621 |
|
|
|
8,410,474 |
|
|
|
13,541,095 |
|
|
|
151,777 |
|
|
|
5,130,621 |
|
|
|
8,562,251 |
|
|
|
13,692,872 |
|
|
|
1,136,769 |
|
|
2002 |
|
6/1/2016 |
Wellington |
|
FL |
|
|
14,456,568 |
|
|
|
10,233,511 |
|
|
|
11,662,801 |
|
|
|
21,896,312 |
|
|
|
65,191 |
|
|
|
10,233,511 |
|
|
|
11,727,992 |
|
|
|
21,961,503 |
|
|
|
1,359,869 |
|
|
2005 |
|
6/1/2016 |
Doral |
|
FL |
|
|
14,133,517 |
|
|
|
11,335,658 |
|
|
|
11,485,045 |
|
|
|
22,820,703 |
|
|
|
207,247 |
|
|
|
11,335,658 |
|
|
|
11,692,292 |
|
|
|
23,027,950 |
|
|
|
1,371,867 |
|
|
1998 |
|
6/1/2016 |
Plantation |
|
FL |
|
|
15,969,792 |
|
|
|
12,989,079 |
|
|
|
19,224,919 |
|
|
|
32,213,998 |
|
|
|
111,811 |
|
|
|
12,989,079 |
|
|
|
19,336,730 |
|
|
|
32,325,809 |
|
|
|
2,245,241 |
|
|
2002/2012 |
|
6/1/2016 |
Naples |
|
FL |
|
|
14,214,280 |
|
|
|
11,789,085 |
|
|
|
12,771,305 |
|
|
|
24,560,390 |
|
|
|
167,417 |
|
|
|
11,789,085 |
|
|
|
12,938,722 |
|
|
|
24,727,807 |
|
|
|
1,476,192 |
|
|
2002 |
|
6/1/2016 |
Delray |
|
FL |
|
|
11,854,625 |
|
|
|
17,096,692 |
|
|
|
12,983,627 |
|
|
|
30,080,319 |
|
|
|
173,022 |
|
|
|
17,096,692 |
|
|
|
13,156,649 |
|
|
|
30,253,341 |
|
|
|
1,541,643 |
|
|
2003 |
|
6/1/2016 |
Baltimore |
|
MD |
|
|
16,293,926 |
|
|
|
3,897,872 |
|
|
|
22,427,843 |
|
|
|
26,325,715 |
|
|
|
276,571 |
|
|
|
3,897,872 |
|
|
|
22,704,414 |
|
|
|
26,602,286 |
|
|
|
2,739,385 |
|
|
1990/2014 |
|
6/1/2016 |
Sonoma |
|
CA |
|
|
6,283,197 |
|
|
|
3,468,153 |
|
|
|
3,679,939 |
|
|
|
7,148,092 |
|
|
|
51,077 |
|
|
|
3,468,153 |
|
|
|
3,731,016 |
|
|
|
7,199,169 |
|
|
|
472,501 |
|
|
1984 |
|
6/14/2016 |
Las Vegas I |
|
NV |
|
|
10,210,195 |
|
|
|
2,391,220 |
|
|
|
11,117,892 |
|
|
|
13,509,112 |
|
|
|
144,928 |
|
|
|
2,391,220 |
|
|
|
11,262,820 |
|
|
|
13,654,040 |
|
|
|
1,179,359 |
|
|
2002 |
|
7/28/2016 |
Las Vegas II |
|
NV |
|
|
10,471,995 |
|
|
|
3,840,088 |
|
|
|
9,916,937 |
|
|
|
13,757,025 |
|
|
|
111,618 |
|
|
|
3,840,088 |
|
|
|
10,028,555 |
|
|
|
13,868,643 |
|
|
|
1,108,709 |
|
|
2000 |
|
9/23/2016 |
Las Vegas III |
|
NV |
|
|
6,544,997 |
|
|
|
2,565,579 |
|
|
|
6,338,944 |
|
|
|
8,904,523 |
|
|
|
169,906 |
|
|
|
2,565,579 |
|
|
|
6,508,850 |
|
|
|
9,074,429 |
|
|
|
737,188 |
|
|
1989 |
|
9/27/2016 |
Asheville I |
|
NC |
|
|
7,113,097 |
|
|
|
3,619,676 |
|
|
|
11,173,603 |
|
|
|
14,793,279 |
|
|
|
288,193 |
|
|
|
3,619,676 |
|
|
|
11,461,796 |
|
|
|
15,081,472 |
|
|
|
1,212,018 |
|
|
1988/2005/2015 |
|
12/30/2016 |
Asheville II |
|
NC |
|
|
3,236,212 |
|
|
|
1,764,969 |
|
|
|
3,107,311 |
|
|
|
4,872,280 |
|
|
|
78,177 |
|
|
|
1,764,969 |
|
|
|
3,185,488 |
|
|
|
4,950,457 |
|
|
|
366,004 |
|
|
1984 |
|
12/30/2016 |
Hendersonville I |
|
NC |
|
|
2,234,137 |
|
|
|
1,081,547 |
|
|
|
3,441,204 |
|
|
|
4,522,751 |
|
|
|
105,475 |
|
|
|
1,081,547 |
|
|
|
3,546,679 |
|
|
|
4,628,226 |
|
|
|
378,487 |
|
|
1982 |
|
12/30/2016 |
Asheville III |
|
NC |
|
|
4,657,189 |
|
|
|
5,096,833 |
|
|
|
4,620,013 |
|
|
|
9,716,846 |
|
|
|
159,066 |
|
|
|
5,096,833 |
|
|
|
4,779,079 |
|
|
|
9,875,912 |
|
|
|
558,244 |
|
|
1991/2002 |
|
12/30/2016 |
Arden |
|
NC |
|
|
6,529,921 |
|
|
|
1,790,118 |
|
|
|
10,265,741 |
|
|
|
12,055,859 |
|
|
|
199,741 |
|
|
|
1,790,118 |
|
|
|
10,465,482 |
|
|
|
12,255,600 |
|
|
|
994,253 |
|
|
1973 |
|
12/30/2016 |
Asheville IV |
|
NC |
|
|
4,394,350 |
|
|
|
4,558,139 |
|
|
|
4,455,118 |
|
|
|
9,013,257 |
|
|
|
86,312 |
|
|
|
4,558,139 |
|
|
|
4,541,430 |
|
|
|
9,099,569 |
|
|
|
544,682 |
|
|
1985/1986/2005 |
|
12/30/2016 |
Asheville V |
|
NC |
|
|
5,051,449 |
|
|
|
2,414,680 |
|
|
|
7,826,417 |
|
|
|
10,241,097 |
|
|
|
124,678 |
|
|
|
2,414,680 |
|
|
|
7,951,095 |
|
|
|
10,365,775 |
|
|
|
854,206 |
|
|
1978/2009/2014 |
|
12/30/2016 |
Asheville VI |
|
NC |
|
|
3,474,411 |
|
|
|
1,306,240 |
|
|
|
5,121,332 |
|
|
|
6,427,572 |
|
|
|
105,933 |
|
|
|
1,306,240 |
|
|
|
5,227,265 |
|
|
|
6,533,505 |
|
|
|
513,159 |
|
|
2004 |
|
12/30/2016 |
Asheville VIII |
|
NC |
|
|
4,517,556 |
|
|
|
1,764,965 |
|
|
|
6,162,855 |
|
|
|
7,927,820 |
|
|
|
143,977 |
|
|
|
1,764,965 |
|
|
|
6,306,832 |
|
|
|
8,071,797 |
|
|
|
693,448 |
|
|
1968/2002 |
|
12/30/2016 |
Hendersonville II |
|
NC |
|
|
4,254,715 |
|
|
|
2,597,584 |
|
|
|
5,037,350 |
|
|
|
7,634,934 |
|
|
|
160,072 |
|
|
|
2,597,584 |
|
|
|
5,197,422 |
|
|
|
7,795,006 |
|
|
|
657,926 |
|
|
1989/2003 |
|
12/30/2016 |
Asheville VII |
|
NC |
|
|
1,585,252 |
|
|
|
782,457 |
|
|
|
2,139,791 |
|
|
|
2,922,248 |
|
|
|
58,418 |
|
|
|
782,457 |
|
|
|
2,198,209 |
|
|
|
2,980,666 |
|
|
|
253,424 |
|
|
1999 |
|
12/30/2016 |
Sweeten Creek Land |
|
NC |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
348,480 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
348,480 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
348,480 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
348,480 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
N/A |
|
12/30/2016 |
Highland Center Land |
|
NC |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
N/A |
|
12/30/2016 |
Aurora II |
|
CO |
|
|
8,560,873 |
|
|
|
1,584,664 |
|
|
|
8,196,091 |
|
|
|
9,780,755 |
|
|
|
96,060 |
|
|
|
1,584,664 |
|
|
|
8,292,151 |
|
|
|
9,876,815 |
|
|
|
962,350 |
|
|
2012 |
|
1/11/2017 |
Dufferin(2) |
|
ONT |
|
|
18,426,124 |
|
|
|
6,258,511 |
|
|
|
16,287,332 |
|
|
|
22,545,843 |
|
|
|
219,635 |
|
(3) |
|
6,283,048 |
|
|
|
16,482,430 |
|
|
|
22,765,478 |
|
|
|
1,539,550 |
|
|
2015 |
|
2/1/2017 |
Mavis(2) |
|
ONT |
|
|
12,743,301 |
|
|
|
4,657,233 |
|
|
|
14,493,508 |
|
|
|
19,150,741 |
|
|
|
155,843 |
|
(3) |
|
4,675,492 |
|
|
|
14,631,092 |
|
|
|
19,306,584 |
|
|
|
1,348,393 |
|
|
2013 |
|
2/1/2017 |
Brewster(2) |
|
ONT |
|
|
9,385,269 |
|
|
|
4,136,329 |
|
|
|
9,527,410 |
|
|
|
13,663,739 |
|
|
|
107,094 |
|
(3) |
|
4,152,546 |
|
|
|
9,618,287 |
|
|
|
13,770,833 |
|
|
|
897,554 |
|
|
2013 |
|
2/1/2017 |
Granite(2) |
|
ONT |
|
|
6,199,444 |
|
|
|
3,126,446 |
|
|
|
8,701,429 |
|
|
|
11,827,875 |
|
|
|
109,913 |
|
(3) |
|
3,138,703 |
|
|
|
8,799,085 |
|
|
|
11,937,788 |
|
|
|
782,623 |
|
|
1998/2016 |
|
2/1/2017 |
Centennial(2) |
|
ONT |
|
|
4,391,273 |
|
|
|
1,714,644 |
|
|
|
11,428,538 |
|
|
|
13,143,182 |
|
|
|
170,347 |
|
(3) |
|
1,721,366 |
|
|
|
11,592,163 |
|
|
|
13,313,529 |
|
|
|
1,013,267 |
|
|
2016/2017 |
|
2/1/2017 |
S-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company |
|
|
Gross Carrying Amount at December 31, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description |
|
ST |
|
Encumbrance |
|
|
Land |
|
|
Building and Improvements |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |
|
|
Land |
|
|
Building and Improvements |
|
|
Total(1) |
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation |
|
|
Date of Construction |
|
Date Acquired |
|||||||||
Ft. Pierce |
|
FL |
|
|
6,479,547 |
|
|
|
1,152,931 |
|
|
|
12,398,306 |
|
|
|
13,551,237 |
|
|
|
22,461 |
|
|
|
1,152,931 |
|
|
|
12,420,767 |
|
|
|
13,573,698 |
|
|
|
358,952 |
|
|
2008 |
|
1/24/2019 |
Russell Blvd, Las Vegas II |
|
NV |
|
|
13,002,835 |
|
|
|
3,433,634 |
|
|
|
15,449,497 |
|
|
|
18,883,131 |
|
|
|
6,640 |
|
|
|
3,433,634 |
|
|
|
15,456,137 |
|
|
|
18,889,771 |
|
|
|
562,583 |
|
|
1996 |
|
1/24/2019 |
Jones Blvd, Las Vegas I |
|
NV |
|
|
10,902,999 |
|
|
|
1,975,283 |
|
|
|
12,565,410 |
|
|
|
14,540,693 |
|
|
|
35,094 |
|
|
|
1,975,283 |
|
|
|
12,600,504 |
|
|
|
14,575,787 |
|
|
|
362,807 |
|
|
1999 |
|
1/24/2019 |
Airport Rd, Colorado Springs |
|
CO |
|
|
3,664,395 |
|
|
|
870,373 |
|
|
|
7,877,813 |
|
|
|
8,748,186 |
|
|
|
97,297 |
|
|
|
870,373 |
|
|
|
7,975,110 |
|
|
|
8,845,483 |
|
|
|
242,859 |
|
|
1983 |
|
1/24/2019 |
Riverside |
|
CA |
|
|
6,461,036 |
|
|
|
1,259,685 |
|
|
|
6,995,794 |
|
|
|
8,255,479 |
|
|
|
102,225 |
|
|
|
1,259,685 |
|
|
|
7,098,019 |
|
|
|
8,357,704 |
|
|
|
223,795 |
|
|
1980 |
|
1/24/2019 |
Stockton |
|
CA |
|
|
5,653,407 |
|
|
|
783,938 |
|
|
|
7,706,492 |
|
|
|
8,490,430 |
|
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
783,938 |
|
|
|
7,707,724 |
|
|
|
8,491,662 |
|
|
|
243,952 |
|
|
1984 |
|
1/24/2019 |
Azusa |
|
CA |
|
|
9,530,028 |
|
|
|
4,384,861 |
|
|
|
9,153,677 |
|
|
|
13,538,538 |
|
|
|
135,589 |
|
|
|
4,384,861 |
|
|
|
9,289,266 |
|
|
|
13,674,127 |
|
|
|
276,663 |
|
|
1986 |
|
1/24/2019 |
Romeoville |
|
IL |
|
|
3,836,240 |
|
|
|
964,701 |
|
|
|
5,755,146 |
|
|
|
6,719,847 |
|
|
|
48,208 |
|
|
|
964,701 |
|
|
|
5,803,354 |
|
|
|
6,768,055 |
|
|
|
189,896 |
|
|
1986 |
|
1/24/2019 |
Elgin |
|
IL |
|
|
2,665,177 |
|
|
|
1,162,197 |
|
|
|
2,895,052 |
|
|
|
4,057,249 |
|
|
|
41,578 |
|
|
|
1,162,197 |
|
|
|
2,936,630 |
|
|
|
4,098,827 |
|
|
|
121,271 |
|
|
1986 |
|
1/24/2019 |
San Antonio I |
|
TX |
|
|
9,126,214 |
|
|
|
1,602,740 |
|
|
|
9,196,093 |
|
|
|
10,798,833 |
|
|
|
88,535 |
|
|
|
1,602,740 |
|
|
|
9,284,628 |
|
|
|
10,887,368 |
|
|
|
279,444 |
|
|
1998 |
|
1/24/2019 |
Kingwood |
|
TX |
|
|
6,299,510 |
|
|
|
1,016,291 |
|
|
|
9,358,519 |
|
|
|
10,374,810 |
|
|
|
64,973 |
|
|
|
1,016,291 |
|
|
|
9,423,492 |
|
|
|
10,439,783 |
|
|
|
302,752 |
|
|
2001 |
|
1/24/2019 |
Aurora |
|
CO |
|
|
3,942,344 |
|
|
|
1,678,141 |
|
|
|
5,958,219 |
|
|
|
7,636,360 |
|
|
|
12,582 |
|
|
|
1,678,141 |
|
|
|
5,970,801 |
|
|
|
7,648,942 |
|
|
|
243,322 |
|
|
2015 |
|
1/24/2019 |
San Antonio II |
|
TX |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,109,187 |
|
|
|
8,579,806 |
|
|
|
11,688,993 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
2004 |
|
1/24/2019 |
Stoney Creek I |
|
TOR |
|
|
5,591,950 |
|
|
|
2,363,127 |
|
|
|
8,154,202 |
|
|
|
10,517,329 |
|
|
|
321,104 |
|
(3) |
|
2,423,704 |
|
|
|
8,414,729 |
|
|
|
10,838,433 |
|
|
|
261,845 |
|
|
N/A |
|
1/24/2019 |
Torbarrie |
|
TOR |
|
|
5,936,996 |
|
|
|
2,714,051 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,714,051 |
|
|
|
— |
|
(3) |
|
2,783,623 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,783,623 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
1980 |
|
1/24/2019 |
Baseline |
|
AZ |
|
|
5,882,318 |
|
|
|
1,307,289 |
|
|
|
11,385,380 |
|
|
|
12,692,669 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,307,289 |
|
|
|
11,385,380 |
|
|
|
12,692,669 |
|
|
|
362,892 |
|
|
2016 |
|
1/24/2019 |
3173 Sweeten Creek Rd, Asheville |
|
NC |
|
|
3,636,033 |
|
|
|
1,036,164 |
|
|
|
8,764,558 |
|
|
|
9,800,722 |
|
|
|
1,048,068 |
|
|
|
1,036,164 |
|
|
|
9,812,626 |
|
|
|
10,848,790 |
|
|
|
276,861 |
|
|
1982 |
|
1/24/2019 |
Elk Grove |
|
IL |
|
|
3,670,067 |
|
|
|
2,384,166 |
|
|
|
6,000,071 |
|
|
|
8,384,237 |
|
|
|
26,971 |
|
|
|
2,384,166 |
|
|
|
6,027,042 |
|
|
|
8,411,208 |
|
|
|
189,136 |
|
|
2016 |
|
1/24/2019 |
Garden Grove |
|
CA |
|
|
10,885,408 |
|
|
|
8,076,202 |
|
|
|
13,152,494 |
|
|
|
21,228,696 |
|
|
|
68,311 |
|
|
|
8,076,202 |
|
|
|
13,220,805 |
|
|
|
21,297,007 |
|
|
|
405,382 |
|
|
2017 |
|
1/24/2019 |
Deaverview Rd, Asheville |
|
NC |
|
|
2,830,546 |
|
|
|
1,449,001 |
|
|
|
4,412,039 |
|
|
|
5,861,040 |
|
|
|
121,594 |
|
|
|
1,449,001 |
|
|
|
4,533,633 |
|
|
|
5,982,634 |
|
|
|
149,150 |
|
|
1992 |
|
1/24/2019 |
Highland Center Blvd, Asheville |
|
NC |
|
|
3,267,324 |
|
|
|
1,763,875 |
|
|
|
4,823,116 |
|
|
|
6,586,991 |
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
1,763,875 |
|
|
|
4,839,116 |
|
|
|
6,602,991 |
|
|
|
156,742 |
|
|
1994 |
|
1/24/2019 |
Sarasota |
|
FL |
|
|
3,687,085 |
|
|
|
1,084,165 |
|
|
|
7,359,913 |
|
|
|
8,444,078 |
|
|
|
4,123 |
|
|
|
1,084,165 |
|
|
|
7,364,036 |
|
|
|
8,448,201 |
|
|
|
214,523 |
|
|
2017 |
|
1/24/2019 |
Mount Pleasant |
|
SC |
|
|
3,528,256 |
|
|
|
1,054,553 |
|
|
|
5,678,794 |
|
|
|
6,733,347 |
|
|
|
9,916 |
|
|
|
1,054,553 |
|
|
|
5,688,710 |
|
|
|
6,743,263 |
|
|
|
167,246 |
|
|
2016 |
|
1/24/2019 |
Nantucket |
|
MA |
|
|
25,198,238 |
|
|
|
5,854,837 |
|
|
|
33,210,517 |
|
|
|
39,065,354 |
|
|
|
49,887 |
|
|
|
5,854,837 |
|
|
|
33,260,404 |
|
|
|
39,115,241 |
|
|
|
945,522 |
|
|
2002 |
|
1/24/2019 |
Pembroke Pines |
|
FL |
|
|
8,559,709 |
|
|
|
3,146,970 |
|
|
|
14,296,167 |
|
|
|
17,443,137 |
|
|
|
6,192 |
|
|
|
3,146,970 |
|
|
|
14,302,359 |
|
|
|
17,449,329 |
|
|
|
431,009 |
|
|
2018 |
|
1/24/2019 |
Riverview |
|
FL |
|
|
4,674,089 |
|
|
|
1,593,082 |
|
|
|
7,102,271 |
|
|
|
8,695,353 |
|
|
|
9,552 |
|
|
|
1,593,082 |
|
|
|
7,111,823 |
|
|
|
8,704,905 |
|
|
|
228,810 |
|
|
2018 |
|
1/24/2019 |
Eastlake |
|
CA |
|
|
10,193,371 |
|
|
|
2,120,104 |
|
|
|
15,417,746 |
|
|
|
17,537,850 |
|
|
|
5,411 |
|
|
|
2,120,104 |
|
|
|
15,423,157 |
|
|
|
17,543,261 |
|
|
|
430,220 |
|
|
2018 |
|
1/24/2019 |
McKinney |
|
TX |
|
|
5,990,094 |
|
|
|
2,177,186 |
|
|
|
9,320,876 |
|
|
|
11,498,062 |
|
|
|
4,202 |
|
|
|
2,177,186 |
|
|
|
9,325,078 |
|
|
|
11,502,264 |
|
|
|
274,864 |
|
|
2016 |
|
1/24/2019 |
Hualapai Way, Las Vegas |
|
NV |
|
|
5,428,523 |
|
|
|
742,839 |
|
|
|
9,018,717 |
|
|
|
9,761,556 |
|
|
|
3,775 |
|
|
|
742,839 |
|
|
|
9,022,492 |
|
|
|
9,765,331 |
|
|
|
264,977 |
|
|
2018 |
|
1/24/2019 |
Gilbert |
|
AZ |
|
|
5,672,438 |
|
|
|
1,379,687 |
|
|
|
9,021,255 |
|
|
|
10,400,942 |
|
|
|
138,470 |
|
|
|
1,037,750 |
|
|
|
9,501,662 |
|
|
|
10,539,412 |
|
|
|
145,982 |
|
|
2019 |
|
7/11/2019 |
Corporate Office |
|
CA |
|
|
4,179,994 |
|
|
|
975,000 |
|
|
|
5,525,000 |
|
|
|
6,500,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
975,000 |
|
|
|
5,525,000 |
|
|
|
6,500,000 |
|
|
|
75,399 |
|
|
2018 |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
719,769,888 |
|
|
$ |
334,865,685 |
|
|
$ |
823,989,800 |
|
|
$ |
1,158,855,485 |
|
|
$ |
26,589,304 |
|
|
$ |
332,350,688 |
|
|
$ |
841,474,680 |
|
|
$ |
1,173,825,368 |
|
|
$ |
83,692,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The aggregate cost of real estate for United States federal income tax purposes is approximately $1,220,069,468. |
(2) |
This property is located in Ontario, Canada. |
(3) |
The change in cost at these self storage facilities are the net of the impact of foreign exchange rate changes and any actual additions. |
S-3
Activity in real estate facilities during 2019 was as follows:
|
|
2019 |
|
|
Real estate facilities |
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
820,296,026 |
|
Facility acquisitions |
|
|
351,070,238 |
|
Impact of foreign exchange rate changes |
|
|
6,582,603 |
|
Improvements and additions |
|
|
7,565,494 |
|
Asset disposals |
|
|
(11,688,993 |
) |
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
1,173,825,368 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
(54,264,685 |
) |
Asset disposals |
|
|
202,416 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
(29,188,668 |
) |
Impact of foreign exchange rate changes |
|
|
(441,554 |
) |
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
(83,692,491 |
) |
Construction in process |
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
130,383 |
|
Net additions and assets placed into service |
|
|
12,107,339 |
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
12,237,722 |
|
Real estate facilities, net |
|
$ |
1,102,370,599 |
|
S-4
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
10.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
10.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.38 |
|
|
10.39 |
|
|
10.40 |
|
|
10.41 |
|
|
10.42 |
|
|
10.43 |
|
|
21.1* |
|
|
|
|
|
23.1* |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1* |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2* |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1* |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2* |
|
|
|
|
|
99.1* |
|
|
|
|
|
101* |
|
The following SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc. financial information for the Year Ended December 31, 2019, formatted in Inline XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Equity, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
104* |
|
The cover page from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 has been formatted in Inline XBRL |
* |
Filed herewith. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Ladera Ranch, State of California, on March 27, 2020.
SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. |
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Michael S. McClure |
|
Michael S. McClure |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael S. McClure
Michael S. McClure |
|
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
March 27, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James R. Barry
James R. Barry |
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) |
|
March 27, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael Terjung
Michael Terjung |
|
Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
March 27, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David J. Mueller
David J. Mueller |
|
Independent Director |
|
March 27, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Harold “Skip” Perry
Harold “Skip” Perry |
|
Independent Director |
|
March 27, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Timothy S. Morris
Timothy S. Morris |
|
Independent Director |
|
March 27, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Paula Mathews
Paula Mathews |
|
Director |
|
March 27, 2020 |