SMITH A O CORP - Quarter Report: 2012 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012.

or

For the transition period from             to             

Commission File Number 1-475

A. O. Smith Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(414) 359-4000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.                                                                 þ  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

þ  Yes     ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.)            ¨  Yes        þ   No

Class A Common Stock Outstanding as of July 31, 2012 — 6,629,507 shares

Common Stock Outstanding as of July 31, 2012 — 39,560,155 shares

Table of Contents

Index

A. O. Smith Corporation

2

Table of Contents

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

A. O. SMITH CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

(dollars in millions, except for per share data)

(unaudited)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS

Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

(dollars in millions)

(unaudited)

3

Table of Contents

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

A. O. SMITH CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011

(dollars in millions)

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

4

Table of Contents

PART 1 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

A. O. SMITH CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

(dollars in millions)

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

5

Table of Contents

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

A. O. SMITH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year. It is suggested that the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the company’s latest Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 27, 2012.

Except where otherwise indicated, amounts reflected in the financial statements or the notes thereto relate to the company’s continuing operations.

Certain other prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2012 presentation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-08, “Testing of Goodwill for Impairment (Topic 350)”. ASU No. 2011-08 allows companies to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test needs to be performed. Under the option, an entity no longer would be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless it determines, based on that qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The ASU may change how a company tests goodwill for impairment, but should not change the timing or measurement of goodwill impairments. ASU 2011-08 will be effective for the year ending December 31, 2012. The company is currently reviewing the standard for applicability.

On August 26, 2011, the company acquired 100 percent of the shares of Lochinvar Corporation (Lochinvar), a privately held manufacturer of high-efficiency boilers used in commercial and residential applications located in Lebanon, Tennessee. The addition of Lochinvar expands the company’s product offerings and gives the company access to proven high-efficiency boiler technology. Lochinvar is included in the North America segment except for a relatively immaterial amount from the Lochinvar U.K. subsidiary which is included in the Rest of World segment.

The company paid an aggregate cash purchase price, net of $1.5 million of cash acquired, of $421.1 million. In addition, the company incurred acquisition costs of approximately $5.5 million. Under the purchase agreement for the Lochinvar acquisition, the company agreed to make a contingent payment of up to an additional $35.0 million in cash based on the amount by which Lochinvar sales between December 1, 2011 and November 30, 2012 exceed $216.0 million. As of the acquisition date and June 30, 2012, the fair value of the contingent payment has been estimated at $16.8 million.

6

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the allocation of fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition. Of the $258.3 million of acquired intangible assets, $103.5 million has been assigned to trade names that are not subject to amortization and $152.5 million has been assigned to customer lists which are being amortized over 19 years, and the remaining $2.3 million has been assigned to non-compete agreements and patents which are being amortized over ten years.

For income tax purposes, the transaction has been accounted for as an asset purchase, resulting in the full amount of goodwill and intangible assets, totaling $369.7 million, being deductible for income tax purposes.

Lochinvar’s results of operations have been included in the company’s financial statements from August 26, 2011, the date of acquisition. Revenues and pretax earnings associated with Lochinvar included in the three months ended June 30, 2012 totaled $54.8 million and $10.6 million, respectively. Revenues and pretax earnings associated with Lochinvar included in the six months ended June 30, 2012 totaled $104.1 million and $20.5 million, respectively.

The following table represents the pro forma unaudited results of operations for the company for three and the six months ended June 30, 2011 assuming consummation of the purchase of Lochinvar as of January 1, 2011 (dollars in millions except per share data):

The pro forma results have been prepared for informational purposes only and include adjustments to depreciation expense of acquired plant and equipment, amortization of intangible assets other than goodwill and trade names, increased interest expense on acquisition related debt, and certain other adjustments, together with related income tax effects of such adjustments. These pro forma results do not purport to be indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred had the purchase been made as of the beginning of the period presented or of the results of operations that may occur in the future.

7

Table of Contents

On August 22, 2011, the company completed the sale of its Electrical Products Company (EPC) to Regal Beloit Corporation (RBC) for $759.9 million in cash and approximately 2.83 million of RBC shares. Included in the $759.9 million of cash was a final working capital adjustment of $7.4 million which was paid to the company by RBC in January 2012. The value of the RBC shares on the date of the closing of the sale was $140.6 million. See Note 14 for further discussion regarding the company’s investment in RBC stock. The company paid $31.1 million in income taxes and $2.9 million of other sale related expenses in the six months ended June 30, 2012 and estimates it will pay an additional $3.0 million of income taxes in 2012.

As a part of the sale of EPC, the company recorded an additional income tax accrual of $56.5 million due to the company’s assertion that certain foreign earnings derived from the sale of EPC were not considered permanently reinvested by the company. The accrual is included in other long term liabilities in continuing operations.

The results of EPC have been reported separately as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

The condensed statement of earnings of the EPC discontinued operations is:

8

Table of Contents

The cash flow provided by EPC discontinued operations is as follows:

Six months ended June 30, 2011 (dollars in millions)

The company has a $425 million multi-currency revolving credit agreement with eight banks. The facility expires on November 13, 2013 and has an accordion provision which allows it to be increased up to $525 million if certain conditions (including lender approval) are satisfied. Interest rates on borrowings under the facility are determined in part based upon the company’s leverage ratio.

Borrowings under bank credit lines and commercial paper borrowings are supported by the $425 million revolving credit agreement. As a result of the long-term nature of this facility, the commercial paper and credit line borrowings are classified as long-term debt at June 30, 2012.

9

Table of Contents

The company offers warranties on the sales of certain of its products and records an accrual for the estimated future claims. The following table presents the company’s warranty liability activity.

See Note 15 for discussion on the increase in warranty reserve due to settlement and the increase in warranty expense and reserve associated with component parts in Canada.

The numerator for the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share is net earnings. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted weighted-average shares used in the earnings per share calculations:

The company adopted the A. O. Smith Combined Incentive Compensation Plan (the “plan”) effective January 1, 2007. The plan is a continuation of the A. O. Smith Combined Executive Incentive Compensation Plan which was originally approved by stockholders in 2002. The number of shares available for granting of options, restricted stock or share units under the plan at June 30, 2012 was 1,629,600. Upon stock option exercise or share unit vesting, shares are issued from treasury stock.

Total stock based compensation cost recognized in the three month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $1.4 million and $1.1 million, respectively. Total stock based compensation cost recognized in the six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $3.8 million and $3.5 million, respectively.

10

Table of Contents

Stock Options

The stock options granted in the six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, have three year pro-rata vesting from the date of grant. Stock options are issued at exercise prices equal to the fair value of Common Stock on the date of grant. For active employees, all options granted in 2012 and 2011 expire ten years after date of grant. Options are expensed ratably over the three year vesting period. Stock based compensation cost attributable to stock options in the three month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $0.7 million and $0.6 million, respectively. Stock based compensation expense attributable to stock options in the six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $1.8 million and $1.8 million, respectively. Included in the stock option expense for the six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was expense associated with the accelerated vesting of stock option awards for certain employees who either are retirement eligible or become retirement eligible during the vesting period.

Changes in option awards, all of which relate to Common Stock, were as follows for the six months ended June 30, 2012:

The weighted-average fair value per option at the date of grant during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model was $16.52 and $16.51, respectively. Assumptions were as follows:

The expected life is based on historical exercise behavior and the projected exercise of unexercised stock options. The risk free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect on the date of grant for the expected life of the option. The actual dividend yield is based on the actual annual dividends divided by the grant date market value of the company’s common stock. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the company’s common stock.

11

Table of Contents

Restricted Stock and Share Units

Participants may also be awarded shares of restricted stock or share units under the plan. The company granted 83,900 and 75,625 share units under the plan in the six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The share units were valued at $3.9 million and $3.3 million at the date of issuance in 2012 and 2011, respectively, based on the company’s stock price at the date of grant and will be recognized as compensation expense ratably over the three-year vesting period. Share based compensation expense attributable to share units of $0.7 million and $0.5 million was recognized in the three month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Share based compensation expense attributable to share units of $2.0 million and $1.7 million was recognized in the six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Share based compensation expense recognized in the six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 included expense associated with accelerated vesting of share unit awards for certain employees who either are retirement eligible or will become retirement eligible during the vesting period.

A summary of share unit activity under the plan is as follows:

The following table presents the components of the company’s net pension expense.

The company made the pension plan contributions totaling $175.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 and does not anticipate making a contribution in 2012. Included in the table above is $0.5 million and $1.0 million of defined benefit plan expense associated with the company’s discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively.

12

Table of Contents

Prior to the sale of EPC the company had identified two segments, Water Products Company and EPC. As a result of the sale of EPC and a change in management reporting, the company reconsidered its segment reporting in the fourth quarter of 2011 and determined that it is comprised of two reporting segments: North America and Rest of World. Both segments manufacture and market comprehensive lines of residential gas, gas tankless, oil and electric water heaters and commercial water heating equipment. Both segments primarily serve their respective regions of the world. The North America segment also manufactures and markets specialty commercial water heating equipment, condensing and non-condensing boilers and water system tanks. The Rest of World segment also manufactures and markets water treatment products, primarily for China.

The company adopted Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 157) on January 1, 2008. ASC 820, among other things, defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure for each major asset and liability category measured at fair value on either a recurring basis or nonrecurring basis. ASC 820 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, ASC 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which

13

Table of Contents

11. Fair Value Measurements (continued)

prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

Continuing assets and liabilities measured at fair value are based on the market approach which are prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.

Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows (dollars in millions):

There were no changes in the company’s valuation techniques used to measure fair values on a recurring basis as a result of adopting ASC 820.

ASC 815 Derivatives and Hedging (formerly SFAS No. 133), as amended, requires that all derivative instruments be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value and establishes criteria for designation and effectiveness of the hedging relationships. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as a part of a hedging relationship and further, on the type of hedging relationship. For those

derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, the company must designate the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure hedged, as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge, or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation.

The company designates that all of its hedging instruments, except for its equity collar contract relating to RBC shares, are cash flow hedges. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge (i.e., hedging the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows that is attributable to a particular risk), the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (OCI), net of tax, and is reclassified into earnings in the same line item associated with the forecasted transaction and in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The amount by which the cumulative change in the value of the hedge more than offsets the cumulative change in the value of the hedged item (i.e., the ineffective portion) is recorded in earnings, net of tax, in the period the ineffectiveness occurs.

The company utilizes certain derivative instruments to enhance its ability to manage currency as well as raw materials price risk and equity investment volatility. Derivative instruments are entered into for periods consistent with the related underlying exposures and do not constitute positions independent of those exposures. The company does not enter into contracts for speculative purposes. The contracts are executed with major financial institutions with no credit loss anticipated for failure of the counterparties to perform.

14

Table of Contents

Foreign Currency Forward Contracts

The company is exposed to foreign currency exchange risk as a result of transactions in currencies other than the functional currency of certain subsidiaries. The company utilizes foreign currency forward purchase and sale contracts to manage the volatility associated with foreign currency purchases, sales and certain intercompany transactions in the normal course of business. Principal currencies include the Canadian dollar, Chinese renminbi, Euro and Mexican peso.

Gains and losses on these instruments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, until the underlying transaction is recorded in earnings. When the hedged item is realized, gains or losses are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to the statement of earnings. The assessment of effectiveness for forward contracts is based on changes in the forward rates. These hedges have been determined to be effective.

The majority of the amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss for cash flow hedges is expected to be reclassified into earnings within one year and all of the hedges will be reclassified into earnings no later than December 31, 2013. Contracts related to the company’s discontinued operations that expired after the closing date no longer qualified for hedge accounting; therefore, the change in valuation during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 of $0.9 million and $3.2 million, respectively, were recorded in earnings from discontinued operations.

The following table summarizes, by currency, the contractual amounts of the company’s foreign currency forward contracts for continuing operations.