SOUTH DAKOTA SOYBEAN PROCESSORS LLC - Quarter Report: 2005 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
ý QUARTERLY REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
COMMISSION FILE NO. 0-50253
SOUTH DAKOTA SOYBEAN PROCESSORS, LLC
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
South Dakota |
|
46-0462968 |
(State
of Other Jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S.
Employer |
100 Caspian Avenue, Post Office Box 500, Volga, South Dakota 57071
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(605) 627-9240
(Registrants Telephone Number)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
(1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is
an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
Yes o No ý
APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS
Check whether the registrant filed all documents
and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act
after the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yes o No
o
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date:
On July 22, 2005, the registrant had 30,445,500 capital units outstanding.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
SOUTH DAKOTA SOYBEAN PROCESSORS, LLC
UNAUDITED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2004
2
SOUTH DAKOTA SOYBEAN PROCESSORS, LLC
Index to Financial Statements
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2005 (unaudited), and December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) |
|
3
SOUTH DAKOTA SOYBEAN PROCESSORS, LLC
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
29,230 |
|
$ |
11,423 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for uncollectible accounts of $28,000 |
|
17,136,959 |
|
17,452,118 |
|
||
Inventories (Note 2) |
|
13,992,165 |
|
8,601,502 |
|
||
Margin deposits |
|
307,291 |
|
1,424,422 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses |
|
383,782 |
|
538,816 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
31,849,427 |
|
28,028,281 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT |
|
51,716,947 |
|
51,398,225 |
|
||
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
(22,706,324 |
) |
(21,268,006 |
) |
||
Total property and equipment, net |
|
29,010,623 |
|
30,130,219 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
OTHER ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Investments |
|
4,193,673 |
|
4,077,625 |
|
||
Equity investment in unconsolidated affiliate |
|
2,674,103 |
|
2,869,366 |
|
||
Notes receivable - members |
|
481,710 |
|
481,710 |
|
||
Patents, net |
|
6,813,686 |
|
6,900,047 |
|
||
Other, net |
|
8,549 |
|
12,640 |
|
||
Total other assets |
|
14,171,721 |
|
14,341,388 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
75,031,771 |
|
$ |
72,499,888 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
F-1
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Excess of outstanding checks over bank balance |
|
$ |
2,346,952 |
|
$ |
3,411,975 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
2,511,310 |
|
1,216,438 |
|
||
Note payable - seasonal loan (Note 3) |
|
2,758,890 |
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
1,175,893 |
|
928,858 |
|
||
Accrued commodity purchases |
|
17,154,428 |
|
23,640,446 |
|
||
Accrued expenses |
|
1,799,630 |
|
1,646,228 |
|
||
Accrued interest |
|
39,367 |
|
49,471 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
27,786,470 |
|
30,893,416 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
|
16,812,600 |
|
8,986,151 |
|
||
Deferred compensation |
|
123,899 |
|
129,345 |
|
||
Total long-term liabilities |
|
16,936,499 |
|
9,115,496 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
MINORITY INTEREST IN CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARY |
|
101,248 |
|
368,403 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
COMMITMENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
MEMBERS' EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Class A Units, no par value, 30,445,500 and 28,228,500 units issued and outstanding at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively |
|
32,238,004 |
|
32,122,573 |
|
||
Subscriptions receivable (Note 4) |
|
(2,030,450 |
) |
|
|
||
Total members' equity |
|
30,207,554 |
|
32,122,573 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total liabilities and members' equity |
|
$ |
75,031,771 |
|
$ |
72,499,888 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
F-2
SOUTH DAKOTA SOYBEAN PROCESSORS, LLC
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE THREE-MONTH AND SIX-MONTH PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2004
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30: |
|
Six Months Ended June 30: |
|
||||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
NET REVENUES |
|
$ |
49,665,296 |
|
$ |
71,177,940 |
|
$ |
95,816,856 |
|
$ |
129,391,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
COST OF REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cost of product sold |
|
42,276,963 |
|
59,891,905 |
|
79,962,387 |
|
111,100,916 |
|
||||
Production |
|
4,009,761 |
|
3,589,902 |
|
7,973,159 |
|
7,074,049 |
|
||||
Freight and rail |
|
4,641,518 |
|
4,590,549 |
|
9,975,109 |
|
8,202,212 |
|
||||
Brokerage fees |
|
55,360 |
|
84,540 |
|
113,611 |
|
145,811 |
|
||||
Total cost of revenues |
|
50,983,602 |
|
68,156,896 |
|
98,024,266 |
|
126,522,988 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
GROSS PROFIT (LOSS) |
|
(1,318,306 |
) |
3,021,044 |
|
(2,207,410 |
) |
2,868,128 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Administration |
|
1,183,844 |
|
1,039,594 |
|
2,287,463 |
|
1,964,444 |
|
||||
OPERATING PROFIT (LOSS) |
|
(2,502,150 |
) |
1,981,450 |
|
(4,494,873 |
) |
903,684 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest expense |
|
(202,935 |
) |
(412,649 |
) |
(564,274 |
) |
(616,284 |
) |
||||
Other non-operating income (expense) |
|
30,367 |
|
(52,572 |
) |
152,010 |
|
22,384 |
|
||||
Patronage dividend income |
|
193,413 |
|
|
|
193,413 |
|
153,961 |
|
||||
Total other income (expense) |
|
20,845 |
|
(465,221 |
) |
(218,851 |
) |
(439,939 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND MINORITY INTEREST OF SUBSIDIARY |
|
(2,481,305 |
) |
1,516,229 |
|
(4,713,724 |
) |
463,745 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
MINORITY INTEREST IN NET LOSS OF SUBSIDIARY |
|
133,830 |
|
168,125 |
|
267,155 |
|
358,128 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
(2,347,475 |
) |
1,684,354 |
|
(4,446,569 |
) |
821,873 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
INCOME TAX EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,032 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
|
$ |
(2,347,475 |
) |
$ |
1,684,354 |
|
$ |
(4,446,569 |
) |
$ |
820,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER CAPITAL UNIT |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
$ |
0.06 |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF UNITS OUTSTANDING FOR THE CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER CAPITAL UNIT |
|
29,921,547 |
|
28,258,500 |
|
29,089,680 |
|
28,258,500 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
F-3
SOUTH DAKOTA SOYBEAN PROCESSORS, LLC
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE SIX-MONTH PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2004
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest |
|
$ |
574,378 |
|
$ |
600,358 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Subscriptions receivable upon issuance of member units |
|
$ |
2,030,450 |
|
$ |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
F-4
SOUTH DAKOTA SOYBEAN PROCESSORS, LLC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The financial statements of and for the periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 reflect, in the opinion of management of South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC (the Company or LLC), all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the financial position and results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The results of operations and cash flows for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year due in part to the seasonal nature of some of the Companys businesses. The consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2004 has been derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority-owned subsidiary. The effects of all intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
These statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2004, included in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2005.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions. Such estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as well as disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications
Reclassifications have been made to the June 30, 2004 financial information to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications have no effect on previously reported net income or members equity.
NOTE 2 - INVENTORIES
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Finished goods |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Soy processing |
|
$ |
2,756,787 |
|
$ |
5,913,666 |
|
Refined oil |
|
3,367,559 |
|
602,466 |
|
||
Other |
|
25,608 |
|
46,762 |
|
||
Total finished goods |
|
6,149,954 |
|
6,562,894 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Raw materials |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Soy processing |
|
7,716,808 |
|
1,950,568 |
|
||
Refined oil |
|
29,380 |
|
18,909 |
|
||
Other |
|
43,608 |
|
17,167 |
|
||
Total raw materials |
|
7,789,796 |
|
1,986,644 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Supplies & miscellaneous |
|
52,415 |
|
51,964 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Totals |
|
$ |
13,992,165 |
|
$ |
8,601,502 |
|
F-5
NOTE 3 - NOTES PAYABLE SEASONAL LOAN
The Company has entered into a revolving credit agreement with CoBank, which expired July 1, 2005. Subsequent to June 30, 2005, CoBank unilaterally extended the maturity date to September 1, 2005. The purpose of the credit agreement is to finance the inventory and accounts receivable of the Company. The Company may borrow up to $15,200,000. Interest accrues at a variable rate (5.84% at June 30, 2005). There were advances outstanding at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 of $2,758,890 and $0, respectively. Advances on the revolving credit agreement are limited based upon inventory and accounts receivable, net of soybean accounts payable.
The Company is in violation of one of its loan covenants as of June 30, 2005. The loan covenants with CoBank require the Company to maintain a minimum working capital of $6.0 million. At June 30, 2005, working capital was approximately $4.1 million. CoBank has granted a waiver of this working capital requirement for June 30, 2005.
NOTE 4 - MEMBERS EQUITY
The Board of Directors approved a registration statement that was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2005 for the sale of additional units in a public offering. The maximum offering under the statement will be $11,250,000. As of June 30, 2005 the Company had sold 2,217,000 member units for a total of $4,562,000. The equity offering allowed the investor to initially pay only 50% and sign a note payable to SDSP for the remaining portion. At June 30, 2005, the Company had subscriptions receivable of $2,030,450.
NOTE 5 - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time in the ordinary course of our business, we may be named as a defendant in legal proceedings related to various issues, including without limitation, workers compensation claims, tort claims, or contractual disputes. We carry insurance that provides protection against general commercial liability claims, claims against our directors, officers and employees, business interruption, automobile liability, and workers compensation claims. Except as described below, we are not currently involved in any material legal proceedings and are not aware of any potential claims.
On January 28, 2003, we were served with notice that we had been named as a defendant in a breach of contract suit in the circuit court of Cook County, Illinois, along with a number of other individual defendants, including our Chief Executive Officer, Rodney Christianson. The plaintiff, James Jackson, was an employee of USSC whose services were terminated shortly after we became the majority owner in early January 2003. Mr. Jackson claimed that he was wrongfully terminated and that the defendants unjustly interfered with his employment contract and committed fraud in connection with our acquisition of a controlling interest in USSC. On April 24, 2005 we reached a mediated settlement that will include a payment of $300,000 to Mr. Jackson, of which USSC will be responsible for $60,000 and the insurance carrier assumed the remainder of the obligation.
In a related suit, USSC has reached a mediated settlement with Thomas Kurth, former President of USSC, in which Mr. Kurth will transfer his USSC shares and his interest in a developmental product company to USSC for no compensation.
F-6
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
The information in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 with respect to the business and operations of South Dakota Soybean Processors and our affiliates. In addition, we and our representatives and agents may from time to time make other written or oral forward-looking statements, including statements contained in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and our reports to members and security holders. Words and phrases such as believe, expect, anticipate, intend, plan, estimate, predict, hope, will, should, could, may, future, potential, or the negatives of these words, and all similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. We wish to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.
Our forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, risks related to the level of commodity prices, loss of member business, competition in our industry, changes in the taxation of limited liability companies, compliance with laws and regulations, perceptions of food quality and safety, business interruptions and casualty losses, access to equity capital, consolidation of producers and customers, alternative energy sources, and the performance of our polyurethane operations. Other risks or uncertainties may be described from time to time in the companys future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
We undertake no obligation to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances.
4
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion along with our financial statements and the notes to our financial statements included elsewhere in this report, and our audited financial statements for our most recently completed fiscal year included in our latest annual report on Form 10-K. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results, performance, and achievements may differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, any forward-looking statements. See Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information.
Executive Overview
SDSP suffered a net loss of $2.3 million for the second quarter of 2005 versus a profit of $1.7 million for the same period in 2004, a decrease of $4.0 million. In the six months ending June 30, 2005, SDSP recorded a net loss of $4.4 million versus a net income of $821,000 in the same period in 2004, a decrease of $5.2 million. The net loss recorded for the period is largely due to the poor margins that currently exist in the soybean market, which are primarily a result of the combination of the short soybean crop in 2003 followed by a record soybean crop in 2004. On the revenue side, due to the record soybean crop in 2004, our customers are confident that supplies of soybean meal and soybean oil will be readily available, resulting in sale prices falling by 31% and 24%, respectively. On our supply side, due to the short soybean crop in 2003, soybean farmers enjoyed record prices for soybeans in 2004 and emptied their storage bins. Soybean farmers have in large part maintained this higher price expectation following the record crop in 2005, thus the cost of revenues (soybeans) decreased only 22% as farmers demanded higher cash prices to move their soybeans. Higher production expenses and administrative expenses accounted for $1.2 million in lower earnings. Higher energy prices was the primary cause of the $0.9 million increase in production expenses, while director expenses and patent amortization mainly attributed to the $0.3 million increase in administrative expenses.
The soybean industry is experiencing poor margins for the second consecutive year. The 2003 U.S. soybean crop produced only 2.4 billion bushels, which was down from an average crop of 2.8 billion bushels. This short 2003 crop was followed by a record-breaking 3.1 billion U.S. soybean crop in 2004. While signs of improving margin exist in the third quarter 2005, management expects margins to remain under pressure until the health of the 2005 soybean crop is known.
We expect to continue to make progress towards our long-term objectives of delivering high quality products and services at the lowest possible cost, adding value by investing in the further processing of our products, and reviewing new applications for our products in the plastics and energy fields. During 2005, we continued to expend capital to fund the operations of Urethane Soy System Company, Inc. (USSC), our majority-owned subsidiary which markets SoyolÒ, a bio-based polyurethane product made from soybean oil. Higher prices for petroleum products and improving demand for polyurethane products should assist in meeting our objectives.
USSC has increased its product offering from 2 polyols to 15 polyols and 4 systems for the polyurethane industry. We believe that we will see increased demand for SoyolÒ as customers in the carpet, rigid foam, pultrussion, and automotive industries complete their testing of SoyolÒ. However, we do not anticipate that USSC will generate a profit until at least 2006.
As a result of adverse changes in the soybean market and our continued capital investment in USSC, we encountered some cash flow constraints in 2004 and early 2005. In order to provide additional working capital and finance our capital investment in USSC, our Board of Managers authorized an offering of
5
capital units to raise up to $11.25 million, which was launched in February 2005. As of June 30, 2005, we had raised a total of $4,562,500. The equity offering allowed investors to initially pay on 50% and sign a note payable to us for the remaining portion. At June 30, 2005, we had subscriptions receivable of $2,030,450.
Company Profile
We own and operate a soybean processing plant, a SoyolÒ production facility and a soybean oil refinery in Volga, South Dakota. We were originally organized as a South Dakota cooperative, and reorganized into a South Dakota limited liability company effective July 1, 2002. We began producing crude soybean oil and soybean meal in late 1996, and since then we have also expanded our business to include the development of new product lines and management services. In 2000, we began providing management services to Minnesota Soybean Processors (MnSP) and obtained a minority interest in MnSP in 2004. In 2002, we began refining crude soybean oil into a product known as refined and bleached oil, and in early 2003, we became the majority owner and assumed management control of USSC.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparison of the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
Revenue Revenue decreased from $71.2 million for the second quarter of 2004 to $50.0 million for the second quarter of 2005, a decrease of approximately $21.5 million, or 30%. The decrease in revenues is primarily a result of lower soybean meal and soybean oil prices along with a lower sales volume of meal and crude oil. The average sales prices for soybean meal and refined and bleached soybean oil decreased by 32% and 28%, respectively. In addition, sales volume of soybean meal and crude soybean oil decreased by 5% and 51%, respectively, in the second quarter of 2005 versus the second quarter of 2004. The decreases attributable to these factors were slightly offset by higher sales volume of refined and bleached soybean oil during the second quarter of 2005, which increased by 9%. The lower sales volumes of crude soybean oil in the second quarter of 2005 resulted primarily from the fact that we refined more of the crude soybean oil we produced as compared to 2004.
Gross Profit/Loss During the second quarter of 2005, we suffered a gross loss of $1,318,000, compared to a gross profit of $3,021,000 for the second quarter of 2004. Revenues decreased by approximately $21.5 million (30%) in the second quarter of 2005, while cost of revenues decreased by only $17.2 million (25%). The primary reason for the decrease in gross profit is the tight local soybean market, which resulted in higher prices for soybeans. In addition, the gross loss was impacted by a $420,000 (12%) increase in production expense for the second quarter of 2005 compared to the second quarter of 2004. The increase in production expense was primarily attributable to higher natural gas costs and higher maintenance costs in the second quarter of 2005. These increased costs were offset by a decrease of $17.6 million in cost of products sold, which was due to lower soybean prices, decreasing approximately 30% from the second quarter of 2004.
Administrative Expense Administrative expense, including all selling, general and administrative expenses, increased $144,000, or 14%, for the second quarter of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. The increase was due to increased payroll costs, director expenses, professional expenses and patent amortization.
Interest Expense Interest expense decreased by $210,000, or 51%, for the second quarter of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. The decrease was due to lower debt levels as a result of the approximately $9.8 million in principal amount that has been repaid by the Company since the end of the second quarter of 2004. This decrease in interest expense was offset by an increase in interest rate on our
6
senior debt. At June 30, 2005, we had outstanding debt of $22.1 million, most of which consists of our senior debt and seasonal loan, which bore interest at an annual rate of 5.84% interest as of June 30, 2005. At June 30, 2004, we had outstanding debt of $31.8 million, the majority of which bore interest at an annual rate of 3.71%.
Net Income/Loss We recorded a net loss of $2.3 million for the second quarter of 2005, compared to net income of $1.7 million for the same period in 2004. The decrease of $4.0 million in net income is primarily attributable to decreased gross margin on products sold as a result of the tight local soybean market.
Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
Revenue Revenue decreased from $129.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 to $95.8 million for the same period in 2005, a decrease of approximately $33.6 million, or 26%. The decrease in revenues is primarily a result of lower soybean meal and soybean oil prices along with a lower sales volume of crude oil. The average sales prices for soybean meal and refined and bleached soybean oil decreased by 31% and 24%, respectively. In addition, sales volume of crude soybean oil decreased by 60% in the six-month period of 2005 versus the six-month period in 2004. The decreases attributable to these factors were slightly offset by higher sales volume of refined and bleached soybean oil during the first six months of 2005, which increased by 6%. The lower sales volumes of crude soybean oil in 2005 resulted primarily from the fact that we refined more of the crude soybean oil we produced as compared to 2004.
Gross Profit/Loss During the six-month period ended June 30, 2005, we suffered a gross loss of $2.2 million, compared to a gross profit of $2.9 million for the same period in 2004. Revenues decreased by approximately $33.6 million (26%) in the six-month period ended June 30, 2005, while cost of revenues decreased by only $28.5 million (22%). The decrease in gross profit was a result of several factors. The primary reason for the decrease in gross profit is the tight local soybean market, which resulted in higher prices for soybeans. In addition, the decrease in gross profit was impacted by a $1.8 million (22%) increase in freight expense and $899,000 (13%) increase in production expense for the first six months of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. The increased freight cost resulted from higher product volumes delivered to customers and higher freight rates. The increase in production expense was primarily attributable to higher natural gas costs and higher maintenance costs in 2005. These increased costs were offset by a decrease of $31.1 million in cost of products sold, which was due to lower soybean prices, decreasing approximately 30% from 2004.
Administrative Expense Administrative expense, including all selling, general and administrative expenses, increased $323,000, or 16%, for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. The increase results from increased payroll costs, director expenses, professional expenses and patent amortization.
Interest Expense Interest expense decreased by $52,000, or 8%, for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. The decrease was due to lower debt levels as a result of the approximately $9.8 million in principal amount that has been repaid by the Company since the end of the second quarter of 2004. This decrease in interest expense was offset by an increase in the purchase of soybeans on a deferred payment contract, as well as an increase in interest rates on our senior debt. At June 30, 2005, we had outstanding debt of $22.1 million, most of which consists of our senior debt and seasonal loan, which bore interest at an annual rate of 5.84% interest as of June 30, 2005. At June 30, 2004, we had outstanding debt of $31.8 million, the majority of which bore interest at an annual rate of 3.71%.
7
Net Income/Loss We recorded a net loss of $4.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to net income of $821,000 for the same period in 2004. The decrease of $5.3 million in net income is primarily attributable to decreased gross margin on products sold as a result of the tight local soybean market.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows from Operations
Operating activities used $12.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to $14.1 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004. The funds used by the Company in the six months ended June 30, 2005 consisted primarily of a $9.9 million change in current assets and liabilities, $4.4 million in net operating losses, and $267,000 of minority interest in the net loss of USSC, offset by depreciation and amortization expense of $1.7 million.
Cash Flows from Investing Activity
Investing activities used $475,000 during the six-month period ending June 30, 2005 compared to $455,000 in the six-month period ending June 30, 2004. We purchased $351,000 of property and equipment during the period ending June 30, 2005 compared to $403,000 purchased in the period ending June 30, 2004. The $351,000 spent on property and equipment during the six months ended June 30, 2005 consisted of equipment to improve the performance in our crushing operations and to update our information technology hardware.
Cash Flows from Financing Activity
Financing activities provided the Company $13.3 million for the six-month period ending June 30, 2005 and $14.2 million during the same period in 2004. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, we had $9.2 million in proceeds from long-term debt commitments, $2.8 million in proceeds from seasonal loan commitments, and $2.5 million from the issuance of capital units. These proceeds were offset by decreasing our amount of outstanding checks by $1.1 million.
Indebtedness
CoBank is our primary lender. Effective June 17, 2004, we modified the two lines of credit with CoBank to meet the needs of our operations. The first is a revolving long-term loan agreement. Under the terms of this loan, we began with an $18.4 million credit line. It now reduces by $1.3 million approximately every six months. The final payment will be equal to the remaining unpaid principal balance of the loan on March 20, 2011. The revolving loan is set up so that we may borrow funds as needed up to the credit line maximum, and then pay down the principal whenever excess cash is available. Repaid amounts may be reborrowed up to the available credit line. We pay a 0.50% annual commitment fee on any funds not borrowed.
The second credit line is a revolving working capital loan. In February 2005, CoBank extended this agreement from March 31, 2005 to July 1, 2005. Then, in July 2005, CoBank extended this agreement from July 1, 2005 to September 1, 2005. We plan to refinance this credit line in the third quarter of 2005. The primary purpose of this loan is to finance inventory and receivables. The maximum availability under this credit line is $16 million. Borrowing base reports and financial statements are required monthly to justify the balance borrowed on this line. We pay a 0.25% annual commitment fee
8
on any funds not borrowed; however, we have the option to reduce these credit lines during any given commitment period listed in the agreement to avoid the commitment fee.
Both CoBank loans are set up with a variable rate option. The variable rate is set by CoBank and changes weekly on the first business day of each week. We also have a fixed rate option on both loans allowing us to fix rates for any period between one day and the entire commitment period. We can get a fixed rate quote from CoBank at any time and lock-in the interest rate on all or a part of our borrowings that are available for fixing. Both CoBank loans are secured by substantially all of our assets and are subject to compliance with standard financial covenants and the maintenance of certain financial ratios. The balance borrowed on the revolving term loan was $17.1 million and $15.8 million as of June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. As of June 30, 2005 and 2004, the Company owed $2.8 million and $12.9 million, respectively, on the working capital loan with CoBank. The annual interest rate on both the working capital and revolving term loans as of June 30, 2005 was 5.84%. CoBank has agreed to defer our next scheduled principal payment of $1.3 million.
We were in violation of one of our loan covenants as of June 30, 2005. The loan covenants with CoBank require us to maintain a minimum working capital of $6.0 million. At June 30, 2005, working capital was approximately $4.1 million. CoBank has granted a waiver of this working capital requirement for June 30, 2005.
We also have other long-term contracts and notes totaling approximately $2.2 million, with a weighted average annual interest rate of 2.1% as of June 30, 2005. These arrangements include a no interest $1.8 million long-term payable to the other USSC shareholders relating to our purchase of their tendered USSC shares. The obligation is secured by the purchased shares, with final payment due on October 31, 2006. Our highest interest loan is a $250,000 loan held by USSC at 15% per annum which is payable in 2005. We made principal payments of $36,000 and $41,000 on these additional long-term obligations during the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Capital Raising
During the first two quarters of 2005, we conducted a registered offering to sell up to 5,625,000 new member units. The offering was made available exclusively to our existing members at a price of $2.00 per unit until April 11, 2005, and was available until June 30, 2005 to the general public at a price of $2.50 per unit. As of June 30, 2005, we had sold 2,217,000 member units for a total of $4,562,000.
OFF BALANCE SHEET FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
Lease Commitments
We have commitments under various operating leases for rail cars, various types of vehicles, and lab and office equipment. Our most significant lease commitments are our rail car leases which allow us to distribute our products. We have a number of long-term leases with GE Capital and Trinity Capital for hopper rail cars and oil tank cars. Total lease expense under these arrangements was approximately $1,034,000 and $1,037,000 for the six-month periods ending June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The hopper rail cars earn mileage credit from the railroad through a sublease program which totaled $1,056,000 and $897,000 for the six-month periods ending June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
In addition to the rail car leases, we have several operating leases for various equipment. Total lease expense under these arrangements was $34,000 and $35,000 for the six-month periods ending June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Some of our leases include purchase options; however, none are for a value less than fair market value at the end of the lease.
9
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Preparation of our financial statements requires estimates and judgments to be made that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses reported. Such decisions include the selection of the appropriate accounting principles to be applied and the assumptions on which to base accounting estimates. Management continually evaluates these estimates based on historical experience and other assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances.
The difficulty in applying these policies arises from the assumptions, estimates, and judgments that have to be made currently about matters that are inherently uncertain, such as future economic conditions, operating results and valuations as well as management intentions. As the difficulty increases, the level of precision decreases, meaning that actual results can and probably will be different from those currently estimated.
Of the significant accounting policies described in the notes to the financial statements, we believe that the following may involve a higher degree of estimates, judgments, and complexity:
Commitments and Contingencies
Contingencies, by their nature relate to uncertainties that require management to exercise judgment both in assessing the likelihood that a liability has been incurred, as well as in estimating the amount of the potential expense. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we accrue an expense when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated.
Inventory Valuation
We account for our inventories at estimated net realizable market value. These inventories are agricultural commodities that are freely traded, have quoted market prices, may be sold without significant further processing and have predictable and insignificant costs of disposal. We derive our estimates from local market prices determined by grain terminals in our area. Processed product price estimates are determined by the ending sales contract price as of the close of the final day of the period. This price is determined by the closing price on the Chicago Board of Trade, net of the local basis. Changes in the market values of these inventories are recognized as a component of cost of goods sold.
Long-Lived Assets
Depreciation and amortization of our property, plant and equipment is provided on the straight-line method by charges to operations at rates based upon the expected useful lives of individual or groups of assets. Economic circumstances or other factors may cause managements estimates of expected useful lives to differ from actual.
Long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment and investments are evaluated for impairment on the basis of undiscounted cash flows whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impaired asset is written down to its estimated fair market value based on the best information available. Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate undiscounted future cash flows and may differ from actual.
10
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
We minimize the effects of changes in the price of agricultural commodities by using exchange-traded futures and options contracts to minimize our net positions in these inventories and contracts. We account for changes in market value on exchange-traded futures and option contracts at exchange prices and account for changes in value of forward purchase and sales contracts at local market prices determined by grain terminals in the area. Changes in the market value of all these contracts are recognized in earnings as a component of cost of goods sold.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Commodities Risk & Risk Management. To reduce the price change risks associated with holding fixed price commodity positions, we generally take opposite and offsetting positions by entering into commodity futures contracts (either a straight or options futures contract) on a regulated commodity futures exchange, the Chicago Board of Trade. While hedging activities reduce the risk of loss from increasing market prices of soybeans, such activities also limit the gain potential which otherwise could result from significant decreases in market prices of soybeans. Our policy is generally to maintain a hedged position within limits, but we can be long or short at any time. Our profitability is primarily derived from margins on soybeans processed, not from hedging transactions. Management does not anticipate that its hedging activity will have a significant impact on future operating results or liquidity. Hedging arrangements do not protect against nonperformance of a cash contract.
At any one time, our inventory and purchase contracts for delivery to the plant may be substantial. We have risk management policies and procedures that include net position limits. They are defined by commodity, and include both trader and management limits. This policy and procedure triggers a review by management when any trader is outside of position limits. The position limits are reviewed at least annually with the Board of Directors. We monitor current market conditions and may expand or reduce the limits in response to changes in those conditions.
Foreign Currency Risk. We conduct essentially all of our business in U.S. dollars and have no direct risk regarding foreign currency fluctuations. Foreign currency fluctuations do, however, impact the ability of foreign buyers to purchase U.S. agricultural products and the competitiveness of and demand for U.S. agricultural products compared to the same products offered by foreign suppliers.
Interest Rate Risk. We manage exposure to interest rate changes by using variable rate loan agreements with fixed rate options. Long-term loan agreements can utilize the fixed option through maturity; however, the revolving ability to pay down and borrow back would be eliminated once the funds were fixed.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report, have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that material information required to be disclosed is included in the reports that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation of disclosure controls and
11
procedures that occurred during our second fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time in the ordinary course of our business, we may be named as a defendant in legal proceedings related to various issues, including without limitation, workers compensation claims, tort claims, or contractual disputes. We carry insurance that provides protection against general commercial liability claims, claims against our directors, officers and employees, business interruption, automobile liability, and workers compensation claims. Except as described in our periodic reports on file with the SEC, we are not currently involved in any material legal proceedings and are not aware of any potential claims.
On January 28, 2003, we were served with notice that we had been named as a defendant in a breach of contract suit in the circuit court of Cook County, Illinois, along with a number of other individual defendants, including our Chief Executive Officer, Rodney Christianson. The plaintiff, James Jackson, was an employee of USSC whose services were terminated shortly after we became the majority owner in early January 2003. Mr. Jackson claimed that he was wrongfully terminated and that the defendants unjustly interfered with his employment contract and committed fraud in connection with our acquisition of a controlling interest in USSC. On April 24, 2005 we reached a mediated settlement that will include a payment of $300,000 to Mr. Jackson, of which USSC will be responsible for $60,000 and the insurance carrier will be responsible for the remainder of the obligation.
In a related suit, USSC has reached a mediated settlement with Thomas Kurth, former President of USSC, in which Mr. Kurth will transfer his USSC shares and his interest in a developmental product company to USSC for no compensation.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
On June 21, 2004, we held an annual meeting of members. At the meeting, two member proposals regarding amendments to our Operating Agreement were voted upon by the members present at the meeting. Both of these proposals failed.
VOTE TABULATION FOR MEMBER PROPOSALS
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstentions |
|
Proposal to Extend Term Limit Provision From Three to Four Three-Year Terms |
|
56 |
|
71 |
|
0 |
|
Proposal to Increase the Tax Distribution from 30% of Net Income to 80% of Net Income |
|
30 |
|
85 |
|
1 |
|
At the meeting, Kent Howell, Ronald Gorder, Corey Schnabel, Greg Schmieding, Robert Nelsen, Jerome Jerzak and David Driessen were elected to the Board of Managers. The prior appointment of Steven
12
Preszler to the Board of Managers was also confirmed. Paul Barthel, Dean Christopherson, Wayne Enger, Ryan Hill, Peter Kontz, Laron Krause, Bryce Loomis, Dale Murphy, Daniel Potter, Rodney Skalbeck, Delbert Tschakert, Anthony Van Uden and Ardon Wek will remain on the board until their terms expire, they are reelected, or their earlier death, resignation or removal.
VOTE TABULATION FOR BOARD OF MANAGER NOMINEES
Nominee |
|
For |
|
Abstentions |
|
District One |
|
|
|
|
|
Rick Even |
|
4 |
|
0 |
|
James Hegg |
|
7 |
|
0 |
|
Kent Howell |
|
11 |
|
0 |
|
Scott Olson |
|
5 |
|
0 |
|
Ronald Sckerl |
|
5 |
|
0 |
|
District 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald Gorder |
|
19 |
|
0 |
|
District 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corey Schnabel |
|
10 |
|
0 |
|
District 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Schmieding |
|
14 |
|
0 |
|
District 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Nelsen |
|
25 |
|
0 |
|
District 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jerome Jerzak |
|
12 |
|
0 |
|
Gary Johnson |
|
6 |
|
0 |
|
Alan Nuese |
|
7 |
|
0 |
|
District 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ed Crotty |
|
5 |
|
0 |
|
David Driessen |
|
11 |
|
0 |
|
Jerome Schuelke |
|
6 |
|
0 |
|
District 3 - Confirmation |
|
|
|
|
|
Steven Preszler |
|
10 |
|
0 |
|
In addition, at the meeting, the members ratified amendments to the Operating Agreement that had been previously adopted by the Board of Managers.
VOTE TABULATION FOR RATIFICATION OF
OPERATING AGREEMENT AMENDMENTS
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstentions |
|
Operating Agreement Amendments |
|
120 |
|
10 |
|
0 |
|
Item 5. Other Information
We filed a Form 8-K/A on July 29, 2005 containing certain information regarding our financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 and for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits. See Exhibit Index.
13
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
SOUTH DAKOTA |
||
|
SOYBEAN PROCESSORS, LLC |
||
|
|||
|
|||
Dated: August 15, 2005 |
|||
|
By |
/s/ Rodney G. Christianson |
|
|
|
Rodney G. Christianson |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
14
EXHIBIT INDEX
TO
FORM 10-Q
OF
SOUTH DAKOTA SOYBEAN PROCESSORS, LLC
Exhibit |
|
Description |
3.1(i) |
|
Articles of Organization (1) |
3.1(ii) |
|
Operating Agreement, as amended (2) |
3.1(iii) |
|
Articles of Amendment to Articles of Organization (3) |
4.1 |
|
Form of Class A Unit Certificate (4) |
31 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification |
32 |
|
Section 1350 Certification |
(1) Incorporated by reference from Appendix B to the information statement/prospectus filed as a part of the issuers Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-75804).
(2) Incorporated by reference from the same numbered exhibit to the issuers Form 10-K filed on April 15, 2005.
(3) Incorporated by reference from the same numbered exhibit to the issuers Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2002.
(4) Incorporated by reference from the same
numbered exhibit to the issuers Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No.
333-75804).
15