SOUTH DAKOTA SOYBEAN PROCESSORS LLC - Quarter Report: 2016 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)



x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016



¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

COMMISSION FILE NO. 000-50253

South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



South Dakota		46-0462968
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

100 Caspian Avenue; PO Box 500 Volga, South Dakota		57071
(Address of Principal Executive Offices		(Zip Code)

(605) 627-9240

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):



¨ Large Accelerated Filer	¨ Accelerated Filer	x Non-Accelerated Filer	¨ Smaller Reporting Company
		(do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

¨ Yes x No

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY

PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS

Check whether the registrant filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes ¨ No ¨

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: On August 4, 2016, the registrant had 30,419,000 capital units outstanding.

Table of Contents



			Page

Part I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3

	Item I.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)	3

	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	13

	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	18

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	19

Part II.	OTHER INFORMATION		19

	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	19

	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	19

	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	19

	Item 3.	Defaults among Senior Securities	20

	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	20

	Item 5.	Other Information	20

	Item 6.	Exhibits	20

Signatures			20

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC

Condensed Financial Statements

June 30, 2016 and 2015

South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC

Condensed Balance Sheets



	June 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
	(Unaudited)
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	653,193		$	18,392,462
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for uncollectible accounts of $0 and $495,000 at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively	23,852,918			21,907,703
Inventories	19,374,919			26,318,232
Margin deposits	7,195,005			7,467,409
Prepaid expenses	1,057,778			1,676,576
Total current assets	52,133,813			75,762,382

Property and equipment	84,973,759			83,083,687
Less accumulated depreciation	(43,719,758		)	(42,162,610		)
Total property and equipment, net	41,254,001			40,921,077

Other assets
Investments in cooperatives	6,231,233			6,225,008
Convertible note receivable	850,000			—
Other intangible assets, net	4,048			6,314
Total other assets	7,085,281			6,231,322

Total assets	$	100,473,095		$	122,914,781

Liabilities and Members' Equity
Current liabilities
Excess of outstanding checks over bank balance	$	4,005,874		$	7,485,907
Current maturities of long-term debt	59,558			58,344
Accounts payable	1,354,964			1,471,367
Accrued commodity purchases	21,352,394			35,059,642
Accrued expenses	2,032,455			2,775,993
Accrued interest	130,752			229,805
Deferred liabilities - current	282,658			538,275
Total current liabilities	29,218,655			47,619,333

Long-term debt, less current maturities	5,604,993			787,096

Commitments and contingencies

Members' equity
Class A Units, no par value, 30,419,000 units issued and outstanding at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015	65,649,447			74,508,352

Total liabilities and members' equity	$	100,473,095		$	122,914,781

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC

Condensed Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

For the Three and Six-Month Periods Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015

Net revenues	$	97,297,177		$	90,365,391		$	181,995,092		$	189,372,995

Cost of revenues:
Cost of product sold	79,557,550			74,846,118			146,393,452			153,650,900
Production	5,504,537			5,176,491			11,127,389			10,446,678
Freight and rail	8,725,616			7,746,495			17,489,552			15,442,965
Brokerage fees	187,951			166,703			351,299			292,658
Total cost of revenues	93,975,654			87,935,807			175,361,692			179,833,201

Gross profit	3,321,523			2,429,584			6,633,400			9,539,794

Operating expenses:
Administration	1,070,755			1,081,421			1,879,935			1,803,392

Operating income	2,250,768			1,348,163			4,753,465			7,736,402

Other income (expense):
Interest expense	(110,103		)	(130,410		)	(179,125		)	(287,873		)
Other non-operating income	292,326			324,928			748,181			720,282
Patronage dividend income	—			—			860,846			815,798
Total other income (expense)	182,223			194,518			1,429,902			1,248,207

Income before income taxes	2,432,991			1,542,681			6,183,367			8,984,609

Income tax benefit (expense)	—			(570		)	6,209			(570		)

Net income	$	2,432,991		$	1,542,111		$	6,189,576		$	8,984,039

Basic and diluted earnings per capital unit	$	0.08		$	0.05		$	0.20		$	0.30

Weighted average number of capital units outstanding for calculation of basic and diluted earnings per capital unit	30,419,000			30,419,000			30,419,000			30,419,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015



	2016			2015
Operating activities
Net income	$	6,189,576		$	8,984,039
Charges and credits to net income not affecting cash:
Depreciation and amortization	1,572,786			1,193,731
Gain on sales of property and equipment	(131,400		)	—
Non-cash patronage dividends	(6,225		)	—
Change in current assets and liabilities	(9,032,559		)	(2,198,535		)
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities	(1,407,822		)	7,979,235

Investing activities
Proceeds from sale of investments	—			536,453
Purchase of convertible note receivable	(850,000		)	—
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment	131,400			—
Purchase of property and equipment	(1,903,444		)	(2,898,875		)
Net cash used for investing activities	(2,622,044		)	(2,362,422		)

Financing activities
Change in excess of outstanding checks over bank balances	(3,480,033		)	2,967,033
Distributions to members	(15,048,481		)	(15,048,481		)
Payments for debt issue costs	—			(6,500		)
Proceeds from long-term debt	64,299,350			43,988,711
Principal payments on long-term debt	(59,480,239		)	(44,044,995		)
Net cash used for financing activities	(13,709,403		)	(12,144,232		)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents	(17,739,269		)	(6,527,419		)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	18,392,462			10,743,946

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	653,193		$	4,216,527

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	278,178		$	316,217

Income taxes	$	—		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

Note 1 - Principal Activity and Significant Accounting Policies

The unaudited condensed financial statements contained herein have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities Exchange Commission. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC (the “Company”, “LLC”, “we”, “our”, or “us”) believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading.

In the opinion of management, all normal recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included in the accompanying condensed financial statements. The results of operations and cash flows for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year due in part to the seasonal nature of some of the Company’s businesses. The balance sheet data as of December 31, 2015 has been derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

These statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2015, included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 2016.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when the title to the related products is transferred to the customer. When a sales contract has delivery terms of ‘FOB Shipping Point’, revenue is recognized when the products are shipped. For those sales contracts with delivery terms of ‘FOB Destination’, revenue is not recognized until the products are delivered to the agreed-upon location. Revenues are presented net of discounts and sales allowances.

Recent accounting pronouncements

The Company has reviewed all recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (Revenue from Contracts with Customers), which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard but does not anticipate a material impact to its financial statements.

The FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11 (Inventory: Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory), which requires an entity to measure inventory within the scope at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard but does not anticipate a material impact to its financial statements.

FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 (Leases). The amendments in this ASU revise the accounting related to lessee accounting. Under the new guidance, lessees will be required to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. The new lease guidance also simplified the accounting for sale and leaseback transactions primarily because lessees must recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on January 1, 2019 and should be applied through a modified retrospective transition approach for

South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted. Management has not yet assessed the impact, if any, of adopting this standard.

Note 2 - Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are considered past due when payments are not received on a timely basis in accordance with the Company’s credit terms, which is generally 30 days from invoice date. Accounts considered uncollectible are written off. The Company’s estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts is based on historical experience, its evaluation of the current status of receivables, and unusual circumstances, if any.

The following table presents the aging analysis of trade receivables as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:



	June 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
Past due:
Less than 30 days past due	$	3,247,740	$	2,750,039
30-60 days past due	139,446		145,276
60-90 days past due	—		23,500
Greater than 90 days past due	11,637		776,026
Total past due	3,398,823		3,694,841
Current	20,454,095		18,698,822

Totals	$	23,852,918	$	22,393,663

The following table provides information regarding the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts receivable as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:



	June 30, 2016			December 31, 2015

Balances, beginning of period	$	495,000		$	—
Amounts charged (credited) to costs and expenses	338,163			511,404
Additions (deductions)	(833,163		)	(16,404		)

Balances, end of period	$	—		$	495,000

In general, cash is applied to the oldest outstanding invoice first, unless payment is for a specified invoice. The Company, on a case by case basis, may charge a late fee of 1 ½% per month on past due receivables.

Note 3 - Inventories

The Company’s inventories consist of the following at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:



	June 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
Finished goods	$	(3,215,377	)	$	19,072,452
Raw materials	22,318,500			6,984,054
Supplies & miscellaneous	271,796			261,726

Totals	$	19,374,919		$	26,318,232

Finished goods and raw materials are valued at estimated market value, which approximates net realizable value. In addition, futures and option contracts are marked to market through cost of revenues, with unrealized gains and losses recorded in the above inventory amounts. This market adjustment caused the finished goods to have a credit balance

South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

as of June 30, 2016. Supplies and other inventories are stated at the lower of cost, determined by the first-in, first-out method, or market.

Note 4 - Investments in Cooperatives

The Company’s investments in cooperatives consist of the following at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:



	June 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
Minnesota Soybean Processors:
Common stock and Class A Preferred Shares	$	4,710,158	$	4,710,159
CoBank	1,521,075		1,514,849

Totals	$	6,231,233	$	6,225,008

Note 5 - Convertible Note Receivable

On January 12, 2016, the Company purchased a secured convertible promissory note from DAST, LLC (dba "Prairie AquaTech") with a face amount of $850,000. Interest accrues on the note at the rate of 10% per annum and will be due with the principal on December 31, 2016 unless the note is converted earlier. The entire principal amount and, at the option of the Company, all accrued interest will automatically convert into preferred capital units in Prairie AquaTech when it closes its next preferred equity financing prior to the due date of the note. The quantity of capital units that the Company is entitled to receive upon such conversion shall be determined by dividing the outstanding principal amount and any accrued interest on this note by 11.00. The note is secured by substantially all assets including intellectual property.

Note 6 - Property and Equipment

The following is a summary of the Company's property and equipment at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:



	2016							2015
	Cost		Accumulated Depreciation			Net		Net
Land	$	543,816	$	—		$	543,816	$	543,816
Land improvements	1,188,252		(246,453		)	941,799		980,439
Buildings and improvements	17,683,230		(7,689,601		)	9,993,629		10,149,709
Machinery and equipment	60,705,927		(34,785,637		)	25,920,290		26,979,433
Company vehicles	127,966		(62,238		)	65,728		76,941
Furniture and fixtures	1,582,379		(935,829		)	646,550		583,285
Construction in progress	3,142,189		—			3,142,189		1,607,454

Totals	$	84,973,759	$	(43,719,758	)	$	41,254,001	$	40,921,077

Depreciation of property and equipment was $1,570,520 and $1,191,465 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Note 7 - Note Payable – Seasonal Loan

The Company has entered into a revolving credit agreement with CoBank which expires September 30, 2016. Under this agreement, the Company may borrow up $10 million to finance inventory and accounts receivable. Interest accrues at a variable rate (2.65% at June 30, 2016). Advances on the revolving credit agreement are secured and limited to qualifying inventory and accounts receivable, net of any accrued commodity purchases. There were no advances outstanding at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. The remaining funds available to borrow under the terms of the revolving credit agreement are $10.0 million as of June 30, 2016.

South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

Note 8 - Long-Term Debt

The following is a summary of the Company's long-term debt at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:



	June 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
Revolving term loan from CoBank, interest at variable rates (2.90% and 2.88% at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively), secured by substantially all property and equipment. Loan matures September 20, 2020.	$	4,879,175		$	—
Note payable to Brookings Regional Railroad Authority, due in annual principal and interest installments of $75,500, interest rate at 2.00%, secured by railroad track assets. Note matures June 1, 2020.	785,376			845,440
	5,664,551			845,440
Less current maturities	(59,558		)	(58,344		)

Totals	$	5,604,993		$	787,096

The Company entered into an agreement as of July 15, 2015 with CoBank to amend and restate its Master Loan Agreement (MLA), which includes both the revolving term and seasonal loans. Under the terms and conditions of the MLA, CoBank agreed to make advances to the Company for up to $10,000,000 on the revolving term loan. The available commitment decreases in scheduled periodic increments of $1,250,000 every six months starting March 20, 2017 until maturity on September 20, 2020. The Company pays a 0.40% annual commitment fee on any funds not borrowed. The principal balance outstanding on the revolving term loan was $4,879,175 and $0 as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The remaining commitments available to borrow on the revolving term loan are approximately $5.1 million as of June 30, 2016.

Under this agreement, the Company is subject to compliance with standard financial covenants and the maintenance of certain financial ratios. The Company was in compliance with all covenants and conditions with CoBank as of June 30, 2016.

Effective March 1, 2013, the State of South Dakota Department of Transportation agreed to loan the Brookings County Regional Railway Authority $964,070 for purposes of making improvements to the railway infrastructure near the Company’s soybean processing facility in Volga, South Dakota. In consideration of this secured loan, the Company agreed to provide a guarantee to the State of South Dakota Department of Transportation for the full amount of the loan, plus interest. This guaranty was converted into a direct obligation of the Company’s on October 16, 2013, when the Company received the entire loan proceeds and assumed responsibility for paying the annual principal and interest payments.

The following are minimum principal payments on long-term debt obligations for the twelve-month periods ended June 30:



2017	$	59,558
2018	60,749
2019	1,191,139
2020	3,103,105
2021	1,250,000

Total	$	5,664,551

Note 9 - Member Distribution

On January 19, 2016, the Company’s Board of Managers approved a cash distribution of approximately $15.0 million, or 49.5¢ per capital unit. The distribution was paid in accordance with the Company’s operating agreement and distribution policy on February 8, 2016.

South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

Note 10 - Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into contractual arrangements as a means of managing exposure to changes in commodity prices. The Company’s derivative instruments primarily consist of commodity futures, options and forward contracts. Although these contracts may be effective economic hedges of specified risks, they are not designated as, nor accounted for, as hedging instruments. These contracts are recorded in inventory on the Company’s condensed balance sheets at fair value as discussed in Note 11, Fair Value of Financial Instruments.

As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the value of the Company’s open futures, options and forward contracts was approximately $(6,608,289) and $2,211,112, respectively.



		As of June 30, 2016
	Balance Sheet Classification	Asset Derivatives		Liability Derivatives
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Commodity contracts	Current Assets	$	10,952,916	$	17,555,414
Foreign exchange contracts	Current Assets	33,978		39,769

Totals		$	10,986,894	$	17,595,183



		As of December 31, 2015
	Balance Sheet Classification	Asset Derivatives		Liability Derivatives
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Commodity contracts	Current Assets	$	10,599,610	$	8,296,932
Foreign exchange contracts	Current Assets	75,319		166,885

Totals		$	10,674,929	$	8,463,817

During the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivative transactions were recognized in the condensed statement of operations as follows:



	Net Gain (Loss) Recognized on Derivative Activities for the						Net Gain (Loss) Recognized on Derivative Activities for the
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Commodity contracts	$	(1,009,099	)	$	(4,311,214	)	$	(3,028,028	)	$	(2,112,239	)
Foreign exchange contracts	35,161			55,210			52,157			147,099

Totals	$	(973,938	)	$	(4,256,004	)	$	(2,975,871	)	$	(1,965,140	)

The Company recorded gains (losses) of $(2,975,871) and $(1,965,140) in cost of goods sold related to its commodity derivative instruments for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Note 11 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, establishes a comprehensive framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures which are required about fair value measurements. Specifically, this guidance establishes a hierarchy prioritizing the inputs to valuation techniques, giving the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable value inputs. The three levels of hierarchy and examples are as follows:

South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements


•	Level 1 – Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 1 are highly liquid and actively traded instruments with quoted prices, such as equities listed on the New York Stock Exchange and commodity derivative contracts listed on the Chicago Board of Trade (“CBOT”).


•	Level 2 – Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, but are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The types of assets and liabilities in Level 2 are typically either comparable to actively traded securities or contracts, or priced with models using highly observable inputs, such as commodity prices using forward future prices.


•	Level 3 – Significant inputs to pricing that are unobservable as of the reporting date. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 3 are those with inputs requiring significant management judgment or estimation, such as complex and subjective models and forecasts used to determine the fair value of financial transmission rights.

The following tables set forth financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value in the condensed balance sheets and the respective levels to which fair value measurements are classified within the fair value hierarchy as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:



	Fair Value as of June 30, 2016
	Level 1			Level 2		Level 3		Total
Financial assets:
Inventory	$	(6,602,497	)	$	25,507,296	$	—	$	18,904,799
Margin deposits	$	7,195,005		$	—	$	—	$	7,195,005



	Fair Value as of December 31, 2015
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Financial assets:
Inventory	$	2,302,679	$	23,489,685	$	—	$	25,792,364
Margin deposits	$	7,467,409	$	—	$	—	$	7,467,409

The Company considers the carrying amount of significant classes of financial instruments on the balance sheets, including cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, notes receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities, to be reasonable estimates of fair value due to their length or maturity. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt approximates the carrying value. The interest rates on the long-term debt are similar to rates the Company would be able to obtain currently in the market.

The Company enters into various commodity derivative instruments, including futures, options, swaps and other agreements. The fair value of the Company’s commodity derivatives is determined using unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments on the CBOT. The Company estimates the fair market value of their finished goods and raw materials inventories using the market price quotations of similar forward future contracts listed on the CBOT and adjusts for the local market adjustments derived from other grain terminals in our area.

The Company has patronage investments in other cooperatives and common stock in a privately held entity. There is no market for their patronage credits or the entity’s common shares, and it is impracticable to estimate fair value of the Company’s investments. These investments are carried on the balance sheet at original cost plus the amount of patronage earnings allocated to the Company, less any cash distributions received.

Note 12 - Subsequent Event

The Company evaluated all of its activities and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in its financial statements or disclosed in the notes to its financial statements.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Forward-Looking Statements

The information in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, (including reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or “Commission”), contains “forward-looking statements” that deal with future results, expectations, plans and performance, and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. Forward-looking statements may include statements which use words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “predict,” “hope,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “future,” “potential,” or the negatives of these words, and all similar expressions. Forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Actual results or actual business or other conditions may differ materially from those contemplated by any forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements are identified in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

We are not under any duty to update the forward-looking statements contained in this report, nor do we guarantee future results or performance or what future business conditions will be like. We caution you not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report.

Executive Overview and Summary

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, we recorded a net income of $6.2 million, compared to a net income of $9.0 million in 2015. The decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in processing margins. First, meal basis has been historically low during the entire six months due to an increase in crush volumes within our industry along with slightly lower demand from the export sector due in part from increased competition from South America. Second, board crush margins were lower in the first quarter of 2016, compared to the same period in 2015, though began to improve during the second quarter of 2016 in anticipation that a rain-delayed harvest in Argentina would shift product demand to the U.S. Finally, oil basis has been trading below historical averages because of weak biodiesel demand tracking lower petroleum prices.

On a more favorable note, our local soybean basis improved during the second quarter as higher futures prices stimulated sales of soybeans from farmers, thereby improving margins in the second quarter. We also continue to benefit from an ample supply of good quality soybeans and the good basis levels at which we have been able to purchase our soybeans. We are cautiously optimistic this trend will continue through the summer and will facilitate our plants operating at full capacity.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2016					Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
	$			% of Revenue		$			% of Revenue
Revenue	$	97,297,177		100.0		$	90,365,391		100.0
Cost of revenues	(93,975,654		)	(96.6	)	(87,935,807		)	(97.3	)
Operating expenses	(1,070,755		)	(1.1	)	(1,081,421		)	(1.2	)
Other income (expense)	182,223			0.2		194,518			0.2
Income tax benefit (expense)	—			—		(570		)	—

Net income	$	2,432,991		2.5		$	1,542,111		1.7

Revenue – Revenue increased $6.9 million, or 7.7%, for the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015. The increase in revenues is primarily due to an 8.2% increase in the quantity of soybeans processed, which increased the sales volume of our soybean products. This increase in production is largely due to the addition of the crushing facility near Miller, South Dakota, which started operating during the second quarter of 2015.

Gross Profit/Loss – Gross profit increased $892,000, or 36.7%, for the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015. The increase in gross profit was primarily due to an improvement in local soybean basis during the second quarter of 2016. During the three months ended June 30, 2016, soybean futures prices increased due to anticipation that a rain delayed harvest in Argentina would shift product demand to the U.S. This increase in soybean futures stimulated local farmers to sell their soybeans. Partially offsetting the increase in gross profit was a $328,000 increase in production expenses due to the increase in quantity of soybeans processed at our new facility near Miller, South Dakota.

Operating Expenses – Administrative expenses, including all selling, general and administrative expenses, remained relatively unchanged for the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015.

Interest Expense – Interest expense decreased $20,000, or 15.6%, during the three months ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015. The decrease in interest expense is due primarily to a decrease in interest rates on our senior debt with CoBank. As of June 30, 2016, the interest rate on our revolving term loan was 2.90%, compared to 3.19% as of June 30, 2015.

Other Non-Operating Income – Other non-operating income, including patronage dividend income, decreased $33,000, or 10.0%, during the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015. The decrease is primarily due to a decrease in oil storage income arising from our issuance of warehouse receipts on CBOT soybean oil contracts. We stored less oil on CBOT oil contracts in the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015, thus decreasing oil storage income in the second quarter of 2016.

Net Income/Loss – During the three months ended June 30, 2016, we generated a net income of $2.4 million, compared to $1.5 million for the same period in 2015. The $0.9 million increase in net income is primarily attributable to an increase in gross profit associated with an improved local soybean basis.

Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015



	Six Months Ended June 30, 2016					Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
	$			% of Revenue		$			% of Revenue
Revenue	$	181,995,092		100.0		$	189,372,995		100.0
Cost of revenues	(175,361,692		)	(96.4	)	(179,833,201		)	(95.0	)
Operating expenses	(1,879,935		)	(1.0	)	(1,803,392		)	(1.0	)
Other income (expense)	1,429,902			0.8		1,248,207			0.7
Income tax benefit (expense)	6,209			—		(570		)	—

Net income	$	6,189,576		3.4		$	8,984,039		4.7

Revenue – Revenue decreased $7.4 million, or 3.9%, for the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015. The decrease in revenues is primarily due to a decrease in the sales price of all our soybean products (meal, oil and hulls). The decrease in sales price is primarily due to an increase in the supply of soybeans resulting from an improved harvest last fall. Partially offsetting this decrease in revenue was an 8.9% increase in the quantity of soybeans processed, which increased the sales volume of our soybean products. This increase in production is largely due to the addition of the crushing facility near Miller, South Dakota, which started operating during the second quarter of 2015.

Gross Profit/Loss – Gross profit decreased $2.9 million, or 30.5%, for the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015. The decrease in gross profit was primarily due to a weakened demand for soybean meal and an increase in production costs. The weak demand for soybean meal was caused by competition from South America and additional production in the U.S. due to a plentiful soybean supply. Production expenses increased $681,000 due to the increase in quantity of soybeans processed at our new facility near Miller, South Dakota.

Operating Expenses – Administrative expenses, including all selling, general and administrative expenses, increased $77,000, or 4.2%, for the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015. The increase is mostly due to an increase in professional fees.

Interest Expense – Interest expense decreased $109,000, or 37.8%, during the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015. The decrease in interest expense is due primarily to decreased debt levels, which resulted from reductions of inventory quantities and commodity prices. The average debt level during the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 was approximately $11.9 million, compared to $15.3 million for the same period in 2015.

Other Non-Operating Income – Other non-operating income, including patronage dividend income, increased $73,000, or 4.7%, during the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015. The increase is primarily due to a $130,000 gain on sale of equipment during the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to $0 during the same period in 2015.

Net Income/Loss – During the six-moth period ended June 30, 2016, we generated a net income of $6.2 million, compared to $9.0 million for the same period in 2015. The $2.8 million decrease in net income is primarily attributable to a decrease in gross profit associated with a deteriorating demand for soybean meal. Soybean meal demand decreased due to increased competition from South America and an increase in crushing capacity in the U.S.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our primary sources of liquidity are cash provided by operations and borrowings under our two lines of credit which are discussed below under “Indebtedness.” On June 30, 2016 and 2015, we had working capital, defined as current assets less current liabilities, of approximately $22.9 million and $14.6 million, respectively. While working capital was positively affected by approximately $20.2 million in net income and $4.8 million in net proceeds from long-term debt since June 30, 2015, it was partially offset by a $15.0 million distribution to members and $4.2 million in purchases of property and equipment during that same period. Based on our current operating plans, we believe that we will be able to fund our needs for the foreseeable future from cash from operations and revolving lines of credit.

The following is a summary of our cash flow from operating, investing and financing activities for each of the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:



	2016			2015
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities	$	(1,407,822	)	$	7,979,235
Net cash used for investing activities	(2,622,044		)	(2,362,422		)
Net cash used for financing activities	(13,709,403		)	(12,144,232		)

Cash Flows Used for Operations

The $9.4 million change in cash flows used for operating activities is primarily attributed to a $9.7 million change in the decrease in inventory and a $4.6 million change in accounts receivable during the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, inventory decreased by approximately $6.9 million, compared to $16.6 million during the same period in 2015. In addition, accounts receivable increased by $1.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to a $2.7 million decrease during the same period in 2015. The decrease in cash flows from inventory and accounts receivable was partially offset by a $5.4 million change in the decrease in accrued commodity purchases during the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015. The changes in inventory, accounts receivable and accrued commodity purchases are the result of a drop in commodity prices due to a large soybean supply following record soybean harvest the past two years.

Cash Flows Used For Investing Activities

The $0.3 million increase in cash flows used for investing activities is due to the purchase of a $850,000 convertible note receivable during the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, compared to $0 during the same period in 2015. On January 12, 2016, we purchased the convertible note from DAST, LLC (dba "Prairie AquaTech"), a start-up company engaged in the research and development of fish food derived from agriculture products like soybeans, with a face amount of $850,000. Interest accrues on the note at the rate of 10% per annum and will be due with the principal on December 31, 2016 unless the note is converted earlier.

Cash Flows Used For Financing Activities

The $1.6 million increase in cash flows used for financing activities is principally due to a decrease in net proceeds on borrowings during the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015. The decrease in borrowings is largely due to a drop in commodity prices caused by an abundant soybean supply and increased competition from South America.

Indebtedness

We have two lines of credit with CoBank, our primary lender, to meet the short and long-term needs of our operations. The first credit line is a revolving long-term loan. Under the terms of this loan, we may borrow funds as needed up to the credit line maximum, or $10.0 million, and then pay down the principal whenever excess cash is available. Repaid amounts may be borrowed up to the available credit line. Beginning on March 20, 2017, the available credit line is reduced by $1.25 million every six months until the credit line’s maturity on September 20, 2020. We pay a 0.40% annual commitment fee on any funds not borrowed. The principal balance outstanding on the revolving term loan was $4.9 million and $0 as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. There were $5.1 million in additional funds available to borrow under this loan as of June 30, 2016.

The second credit line is a revolving working capital (seasonal) loan that matures on September 30, 2016. The primary purpose of this loan is to finance inventory and receivables. The maximum available to borrow under this credit line was $10 million. Borrowing base reports and financial statements are required monthly to justify the balance borrowed on this line. We pay a 0.20% annual commitment fee on any funds not borrowed; however, we have the option to reduce the credit line during any given commitment period listed in the agreement to avoid the commitment fee. There were no advances outstanding on the seasonal loan as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. Under this loan, there were $10.0 million in available funds to borrow as of June 30, 2016.

Both loans with CoBank are set up with a variable rate option. The variable rate is set by CoBank and changes weekly on the first business day of each week. We also have a fixed rate option on both loans allowing us to fix rates for any period between one day and the entire commitment period. The annual interest rate on the revolving term loan is 2.90% and 2.88% as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the interest rate on the seasonal loan is 2.65% and 2.63%, respectively. We were in compliance with all covenants and conditions under the loans as of June 30, 2016 and the date of this filing.

On March 1, 2013, the State of South Dakota Department of Transportation agreed to loan the Brookings County Regional Railway Authority a sum of $964,070 for purposes of making improvements to the railway infrastructure near our soybean processing facility in Volga, South Dakota. In consideration of this secured loan, we agreed to provide a guarantee to the State of South Dakota Department of Transportation for the full amount of the loan, plus 2% interest. This guarantee was converted into a direct debt obligation of ours on October 16, 2013, when we received the $964,070 in loan proceeds and assumed responsibility for the loan's annual principal and interest payments of $75,500 which began on June 1, 2014. The note payable matures on June 1, 2020. The principal balance outstanding on this loan was $785,376 and $845,440 as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

OFF BALANCE SHEET FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

Except as described below, we do not utilize variable interest entities or other off-balance sheet financial arrangements.

Lease Commitments

We have commitments under various operating leases for rail cars, various types of vehicles, and lab and office equipment. Our most significant lease commitments are for the rail cars we use to distribute our products. We have a number of long-term leases for hopper rail cars and oil tank cars with American Railcar Leasing, FRS 1, GATX Corporation, Trinity Capital and Wells Fargo Rail. Total lease expenses under these arrangements are approximately $1.6 million and $1.3 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

In addition to rail car leases, we have several operating leases for various equipment and storage facilities. Total lease expense under these arrangements is $37,000 and $72,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Some of our leases include purchase options, none of which, however, are for a value less than fair market value at the end of the lease.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

See Note 1 of our Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1, for a discussion on the impact, if any, of the recently pronounced accounting standards.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Preparation of our financial statements requires estimates and judgments to be made that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses reported. Such decisions include the selection of the appropriate accounting principles to be applied and the assumptions on which to base accounting estimates. We continually evaluate these estimates based on historical experience and other assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances.

The difficulty in applying these policies arises from the assumptions, estimates, and judgments that have to be made currently about matters that are inherently uncertain, such as future economic conditions, operating results and valuations as well as management intentions. As the difficulty increases, the level of precision decreases, meaning that actual results can and probably will be different from those currently estimated.

Of the significant accounting policies described in the notes to the financial statements, we believe that the following may involve a higher degree of estimates, judgments, and complexity:

Commitments and Contingencies

Contingencies, by their nature relate to uncertainties that require management to exercise judgment both in assessing the likelihood that a liability has been incurred, as well as in estimating the amount of the potential expense. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S, we accrue an expense when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

Inventory Valuation

We account for our inventories at estimated net realizable market value. These inventories are agricultural commodities that are freely traded, have quoted market prices, may be sold without significant further processing, and have predictable and insignificant costs of disposal. We derive our estimates from local market prices determined by grain terminals in our area. Processed product price estimates are determined by the ending sales contract price as of the close of the final day of the period. This price is determined by the closing price on the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT), net of the local basis, for the last two business days of the period and the first business day of the subsequent period. Changes in the market values of these inventories are recognized as a component of cost of goods sold.

Long-Lived Assets

Depreciation and amortization of our property, plant and equipment is provided on the straight-lined method by charges to operations at rates based upon the expected useful lives of individual or groups of assets. Economic circumstances or other factors may cause management’s estimates of expected useful lives to differ from actual.

Long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment and investments are evaluated for impairment on the basis of undiscounted cash flows whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impaired asset is written down to its estimated fair market value based on the best information available. Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate undiscounted future cash flows and may differ from actual.

We evaluate the recoverability of identifiable intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an intangible asset’s carrying value may not be recoverable. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to: (1) a significant decrease in the market value of an asset, (2) a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, or (3) an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition of an asset. We measure the carrying amount of the asset against the estimated undiscounted future cash flows associated with it. Should the sum of the expected future net cash flows be less than the carrying value of the asset being evaluated, an impairment loss would be recognized. The impairment loss would be calculated as the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeded its fair value. The fair value is measured based on quoted market prices, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, the estimate of fair value is based on various valuation techniques, including the discounted value of estimated future cash flows. The evaluation of asset impairment requires us to make assumptions about future cash flows over the life of the asset being evaluated. These assumptions require significant judgment and actual results may differ from assumed and estimated amounts.

Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

We minimize the effects of changes in the price of agricultural commodities by using exchange-traded futures and options contracts to minimize our net positions in these inventories and contracts. We account for changes in market value on exchange-traded futures and option contracts, as well as our forward purchase and sales contracts, using quoted exchange prices for identical instruments. Changes in the market value of all these contracts are recognized in earnings as a component of cost of goods sold.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Commodities Risk & Risk Management. To reduce the price change risks associated with holding fixed price commodity positions, we generally take opposite and offsetting positions by entering into commodity futures contracts (either a straight or options futures contract) on a regulated commodity futures exchange, the CBOT. While hedging activities reduce the risk of loss from changing market prices, such activities also limit the gain potential which otherwise could result from these significant fluctuations in market prices. Our policy is generally to maintain a hedged position within limits, but we can be long or short at any time. Our profitability is primarily derived from margins on soybeans processed, not from hedging transactions. We do not anticipate that our hedging activity will have a significant impact on future operating results or liquidity. Hedging arrangements do not protect against nonperformance of a cash contract.

At any one time, our inventory and purchase contracts for delivery to our facility may be substantial. We have risk management policies and procedures that include net position limits. They are defined by commodity, and include both trader and management limits. This policy and procedure triggers a review by management when any trader is outside of position limits. The position limits are reviewed at least annually with the board of managers. We monitor current market conditions and may expand or reduce the limits in response to changes in those conditions.

An adverse change in market prices would not materially affect our profitability since we generally take opposite and offsetting positions by entering into commodity futures and forward contracts as economic hedges of price risk.

Foreign Currency Risk. We conduct essentially all of our business in U.S. dollars and have minimal direct risk regarding foreign currency fluctuations. Foreign currency fluctuations do, however, impact the ability of foreign buyers to purchase U.S. agricultural products and the competitiveness of and demand for U.S. agricultural products compared to the same products offered by foreign suppliers.

Interest Rate Risk. We manage exposure to interest rate changes by using variable rate loan agreements with fixed rate options. Long-term loan agreements can utilize the fixed option through maturity; however, the revolving ability to pay down and borrow back would be eliminated once the funds were fixed.

As of June 30, 2016, we had $785,376 in fixed rate debt and $20 million of variable rate debt available to borrow. Interest rate changes impact the amount of our interest payments and, therefore, our future earnings and cash flows. Assuming other variables remain constant, a one percentage point (1%) increase in interest rates on our variable rate debt could have an estimated impact on profitability of approximately $200,000 per year.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There were no changes to our internal controls over financial reporting that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2016.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

From time to time in the ordinary course of our business, we may be named as a defendant in legal proceedings related to various issues, including without limitation, workers’ compensation claims, tort claims, or contractual dispute. We carry insurance that provides protection against general commercial liability claims, claims against our directors, officer and employees, business interruption, automobile liability, and workers' compensation. Except for the event listed below, we are not currently involved in any material legal proceedings are not aware of any potential claims.

On November 5, 2015, an incident occurred at our facility in Volga, South Dakota which resulted in the death of an outside contractor. The contractor was in the process of installing a catwalk in the vicinity of an oil storage tank when the incident occurred. No other injuries were reported, and property damage from the accident was limited to the tank and surrounding piping. We have reported the accident to the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration ("OSHA"), which is conducting an investigation. No civil lawsuit has been filed. We notified our respective insurance carriers.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2016, there were no material changes to the Risk Factors disclosed in Item 1A (Part I) of our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

None.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits.

See Exhibit Index.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



			SOUTH DAKOTA SOYBEAN PROCESSORS, LLC

Dated:	August 4, 2016	By	/s/ Thomas Kersting
			Thomas Kersting, Chief Executive Officer
			(Principal Executive Officer)

Dated:	August 4, 2016	By	/s/ Mark Hyde
			Mark Hyde, Chief Financial Officer
			(Principal Financial Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX TO

FORM 10-Q

OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOYBEAN PROCESSORS, LLC



Exhibit Number		Description
3.1(i)		Articles of Organization (1)
3.1(ii)		Operating Agreement, as amended (2)
3.1(iii)		Articles of Amendment to Articles of Organization (3)
4.1		Form of Class A Unit Certificate (4)
31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Chief Executive Officer
31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Chief Financial Officer
32.1		Section 1350 Certification by Chief Executive Officer
32.2		Section 1350 Certification by Chief Financial Officer

____________________________________________________________________________

(1) Incorporated by reference from Appendix B to the information statement/prospectus filed as a part of the issuer’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-75804).

(2) Incorporated by reference from the same numbered exhibit to the issuer’s Form 8-K filed on June 19, 2014.

(3) Incorporated by reference from the same numbered exhibit to the issuer’s Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2002.

(4) Incorporated by reference from the same numbered exhibit to the issuer’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-75804).