-
Annual Statements
-
»
Companies
-
»
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Co
-
»
Quarter Report: 2010 September (Form 10-Q)
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Co - Quarter Report: 2010 September (Form 10-Q)
Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One) |
ý |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 |
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File Number 1-2313 |
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
California |
|
95-1240335 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
2244 Walnut Grove Avenue
(P. O. Box 800)
Rosemead, California |
|
91770 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(626) 302-1212 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer ý
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No ý
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
|
|
|
Class |
|
Outstanding at October 26, 2010 |
Common Stock, no par value |
|
434,888,104 |
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
GLOSSARY
When the following terms and abbreviations appear in the text of this report, they have the meanings indicated below.
|
|
|
2009 Form 10-K |
|
SCE's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 |
AB |
|
Assembly Bill |
AFUDC |
|
allowance for funds used during construction |
APS |
|
Arizona Public Service Company |
ARO(s) |
|
asset retirement obligation(s) |
Bcf |
|
Billion cubic feet |
CAA |
|
Clean Air Act |
CAIR |
|
Clean Air Interstate Rule |
CAISO |
|
California Independent System Operator |
CAMR |
|
Clean Air Mercury Rule |
CARB |
|
California Air Resources Board |
CDWR |
|
California Department of Water Resources |
CEC |
|
California Energy Commission |
CPUC |
|
California Public Utilities Commission |
CRRs |
|
congestion revenue rights |
DCR |
|
Devers-Colorado River |
DOE |
|
U. S. Department of Energy |
DRA |
|
Division of Ratepayer Advocates |
DWP |
|
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power |
ERRA |
|
energy resource recovery account |
FASB |
|
Financial Accounting Standards Board |
FERC |
|
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
FGIC |
|
Financial Guarantee Insurance Company |
Four Corners |
|
coal fueled electric generating facility located in Farmington, New Mexico in which SCE holds a 48% ownership interest |
GAAP |
|
generally accepted accounting principles |
Global Settlement |
|
A settlement between Edison International and the IRS that resolves all of SCE's federal income tax disputes and affirmative claims for tax years 1986 through 2002 and related matters with state tax
authorities. |
GRC |
|
General Rate Case |
Investor-Owned Utilities |
|
SCE, SDG&E and PG&E |
IRS |
|
Internal Revenue Service |
ISO |
|
Independent System Operator |
kWh(s) |
|
kilowatt-hour(s) |
MD&A |
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this report |
Moody's |
|
Moody's Investors Service |
Mohave |
|
two coal fueled electric generating facilities that no longer operate located in Clark County, Nevada in which SCE holds a 56% ownership interest |
MRTU |
|
Market Redesign Technical Upgrade |
MW |
|
megawatts |
MWh |
|
megawatt-hours |
NAAQS |
|
national ambient air quality standards |
NERC |
|
North American Electric Reliability Corporation |
Ninth Circuit |
|
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
NOx |
|
nitrogen oxide |
i
Table of Contents
|
|
|
NRC |
|
Nuclear Regulatory Commission |
NSR |
|
New Source Review |
Palo Verde |
|
large pressurized water nuclear electric generating facility located near Phoenix, Arizona in which SCE holds a 15.8% ownership interest |
PBOP(s) |
|
postretirement benefits other than pension(s) |
PBR |
|
Performance-based ratemaking |
PG&E |
|
Pacific Gas & Electric Company |
PSD |
|
Prevention of Significant Deterioration |
QF(s) |
|
qualifying facility(ies) |
RICO |
|
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization |
ROE |
|
return on equity |
S&P |
|
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services |
San Onofre |
|
large pressurized water nuclear electric generating facility located in south San Clemente, California in which SCE holds a 78.21% ownership interest |
SCAQMD |
|
South Coast Air Quality Management District |
SCE |
|
Southern California Edison Company |
SDG&E |
|
San Diego Gas & Electric |
SEC |
|
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission |
SIP(s) |
|
State Implementation Plan(s) |
SO2 |
|
sulfur dioxide |
SRP |
|
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District |
The Tribes |
|
Navajo Nation and Hopi Tribe |
TURN |
|
The Utility Reform Network |
US EPA |
|
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency |
VIE(s) |
|
variable interest entity(ies) |
|
ii
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Operating revenue |
|
$ |
3,098 |
|
$ |
3,069 |
|
$ |
7,504 |
|
$ |
7,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel |
|
|
100 |
|
|
177 |
|
|
275 |
|
|
533 |
|
Purchased power |
|
|
1,118 |
|
|
1,032 |
|
|
2,337 |
|
|
2,155 |
|
Operation and maintenance |
|
|
803 |
|
|
802 |
|
|
2,272 |
|
|
2,222 |
|
Depreciation, decommissioning and amortization |
|
|
316 |
|
|
302 |
|
|
945 |
|
|
877 |
|
Property and other taxes |
|
|
65 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
195 |
|
|
187 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
2,402 |
|
|
2,373 |
|
|
6,023 |
|
|
5,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
696 |
|
|
696 |
|
|
1,481 |
|
|
1,558 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
2 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
9 |
|
Other income |
|
|
33 |
|
|
69 |
|
|
103 |
|
|
126 |
|
Interest expense net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
(105 |
) |
|
(315 |
) |
|
(320 |
) |
Other expenses |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
(13 |
) |
|
(39 |
) |
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
612 |
|
|
651 |
|
|
1,235 |
|
|
1,340 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
205 |
|
|
236 |
|
|
338 |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
407 |
|
|
415 |
|
|
897 |
|
|
1,181 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
Dividends on preferred and preference stock not
subject to mandatory redemption |
|
|
13 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
39 |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available for common stock |
|
$ |
394 |
|
$ |
346 |
|
$ |
858 |
|
$ |
1,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
407 |
|
$ |
415 |
|
$ |
897 |
|
$ |
1,181 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and postretirement benefits other than pensions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net loss included in net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
407 |
|
|
415 |
|
|
899 |
|
|
1,182 |
|
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to SCE |
|
$ |
407 |
|
$ |
359 |
|
$ |
899 |
|
$ |
1,092 |
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
857 |
|
$ |
462 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
4 |
|
|
9 |
|
Receivables, less allowances of $59 and $53 for uncollectible accounts at respective dates |
|
|
887 |
|
|
719 |
|
Accrued unbilled revenue |
|
|
612 |
|
|
347 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
326 |
|
|
337 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
69 |
|
|
160 |
|
Regulatory assets |
|
|
404 |
|
|
120 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
69 |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
3,228 |
|
|
2,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonutility property less accumulated depreciation of $98 and $744 at respective dates |
|
|
69 |
|
|
324 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning trusts |
|
|
3,347 |
|
|
3,140 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
84 |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments and other assets |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
3,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utility plant, at original cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transmission and distribution |
|
|
23,747 |
|
|
22,214 |
|
Generation |
|
|
2,731 |
|
|
2,667 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(6,097 |
) |
|
(5,921 |
) |
Construction work in progress |
|
|
3,020 |
|
|
2,701 |
|
Nuclear fuel, at amortized cost |
|
|
340 |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total utility plant |
|
|
23,741 |
|
|
21,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
192 |
|
|
187 |
|
Regulatory assets |
|
|
5,227 |
|
|
4,139 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
339 |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term assets |
|
|
5,758 |
|
|
4,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
36,227 |
|
$ |
32,474 |
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
(in millions, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
1,146 |
|
|
1,282 |
|
Accrued taxes |
|
|
150 |
|
|
9 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
98 |
|
|
162 |
|
Customer deposits |
|
|
224 |
|
|
238 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
225 |
|
|
102 |
|
Regulatory liabilities |
|
|
804 |
|
|
367 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
513 |
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
3,160 |
|
|
3,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
7,626 |
|
|
6,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4,173 |
|
|
3,651 |
|
Deferred investment tax credits |
|
|
98 |
|
|
97 |
|
Customer advances |
|
|
114 |
|
|
119 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
496 |
|
Pensions and benefits |
|
|
1,757 |
|
|
1,681 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
3,326 |
|
|
3,198 |
|
Regulatory liabilities |
|
|
3,663 |
|
|
3,328 |
|
Other deferred credits and other long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,879 |
|
|
1,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred credits and other liabilities |
|
|
16,308 |
|
|
14,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
27,094 |
|
|
23,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value (560,000,000 shares authorized; 434,888,104 shares issued and outstanding at each date) |
|
|
2,168 |
|
|
2,168 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
566 |
|
|
551 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
(19 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
5,496 |
|
|
4,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common shareholder's equity |
|
|
8,213 |
|
|
7,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred and preference stock not subject to mandatory redemption |
|
|
920 |
|
|
920 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
9,133 |
|
|
8,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
36,227 |
|
$ |
32,474 |
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30, |
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
897 |
|
$ |
1,181 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, decommissioning and amortization |
|
|
945 |
|
|
877 |
|
Regulatory impacts of net nuclear decommissioning trust earnings (reflected in accumulated depreciation) |
|
|
106 |
|
|
133 |
|
Other amortization |
|
|
82 |
|
|
88 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
12 |
|
|
10 |
|
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits |
|
|
336 |
|
|
353 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
(243 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
33 |
|
Margin and collateral deposits net of collateral received |
|
|
1 |
|
|
20 |
|
Prepaid taxes |
|
|
33 |
|
|
178 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
(279 |
) |
|
(283 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
146 |
|
Accrued taxes |
|
|
140 |
|
|
(101 |
) |
Other current liabilities |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
(25 |
) |
Derivative assets and liabilities net |
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
(359 |
) |
Regulatory assets and liabilities net |
|
|
(530 |
) |
|
951 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
(147 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
235 |
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
2,656 |
|
|
3,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt issued |
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
750 |
|
Long-term debt issuance costs |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
(11 |
) |
Long-term debt repaid |
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
(153 |
) |
Bonds repurchased |
|
|
|
|
|
(219 |
) |
Short-term debt financing net |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,893 |
) |
Settlements of stock-based compensation net |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
4 |
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(239 |
) |
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities |
|
|
622 |
|
|
(1,854 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(2,659 |
) |
|
(2,109 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of nuclear decommissioning trust investments |
|
|
903 |
|
|
1,814 |
|
Purchases of nuclear decommissioning trust investments and other |
|
|
(1,036 |
) |
|
(1,977 |
) |
Sales of short-term investments |
|
|
6 |
|
|
1 |
|
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
(1 |
) |
Customer advances for construction and other investments |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
(12 |
) |
Effect of deconsolidation of variable interest entities |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(2,883 |
) |
|
(2,284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents |
|
|
395 |
|
|
(857 |
) |
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
462 |
|
|
1,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
857 |
|
$ |
754 |
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
SCE is a rate-regulated electric utility that supplies electric energy to a 50,000 square-mile area of central, coastal and southern California. SCE is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Edison International.
Basis of Presentation
SCE's significant accounting policies were described in Note 1 of "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" included in the 2009
Form 10-K. SCE follows the same accounting policies for interim reporting purposes, with the exception of accounting principles adopted as of January 1, 2010, as discussed
below in "New Accounting Guidance." This quarterly report should be read in conjunction with such financial statements.
In
the opinion of management, all adjustments, including recurring accruals, have been made that are necessary to fairly state the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for the periods covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. The results of operations
for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.
The
December 31, 2009 condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
Cash and Equivalents
Cash equivalents included money market funds totaling $825 million and $360 million at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. The carrying value of cash equivalents approximates the fair value, as all investments have maturities of three months or less. For further discussion of money market funds, see
Note 9.
SCE
temporarily invests the ending daily cash balance in its primary disbursement accounts until required for check clearing. SCE reclassified $320 million and $224 million of checks issued
against these accounts, but not yet paid by the financial institution, from cash to accounts payable at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Margin and Collateral Deposits
Margin and collateral deposits include cash deposited with counterparties and brokers, and cash received from counterparties and brokers as credit
support under energy contracts. The amount of margin and collateral deposits generally varies based on changes in the fair value of the positions. SCE nets margin and cash collateral deposits subject
to a master netting arrangement with its derivative
5
Table of Contents
positions
on its consolidated balance sheets. The following table summarizes margin and collateral deposits provided to and received from counterparties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
September 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Collateral provided to counterparties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offset against derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
5 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Reflected in other current assets |
|
|
2 |
|
|
6 |
|
Collateral received from counterparties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reflected in other current liabilities |
|
|
56 |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
New Accounting Guidance
Accounting Guidance Adopted in 2010
ConsolidationImprovements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable
Interest Entities
The
FASB issued an accounting standards update that changes how a company determines when an entity, that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting
(or similar rights), should be consolidated. The determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an ability to direct the activities of the
entity that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and whether the entity has an obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive expected returns of the entity. This guidance
requires a company to provide additional disclosures about its involvement with variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. SCE adopted this
guidance prospectively effective January 1, 2010. The impact of adopting this guidance resulted in the deconsolidation of projects related to four QF contracts. For further discussion, see
Note 12.
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
The
FASB issued an accounting standards update that provides for new disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements. The requirements, which SCE adopted
effective January 1, 2010, include separate disclosure of significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 and the reasons for the transfers. The update also clarified existing
disclosure requirements for the level of disaggregation, inputs and valuation techniques. In addition, effective January 1, 2011, the Level 3 reconciliation of fair value measurements
using significant unobservable inputs should include gross rather than net information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements. The guidance impacts disclosures only. For further discussion,
see Note 9.
Accounting Guidance Not Yet Adopted
Final accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB effective after September 30, 2010 are not expected to have a material effect on SCE's
consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
6
Table of Contents
Note 2. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Commodity Price Risk
SCE is exposed to commodity price risk, which represents the potential impact that can be caused by a change in the market value of a particular
commodity. SCE's hedging program reduces ratepayer exposure to variability in market prices related to SCE's power and gas activities. As part of this program, SCE enters into energy options, swaps,
forward arrangements, tolling arrangements and congestion revenue rights ("CRRs"). These transactions are pre-approved by the CPUC or executed in compliance with CPUC-approved
procurement plans. SCE recovers its related hedging costs through the ERRA balancing account and as a result, exposure to commodity price risk is not expected to impact earnings, but may impact cash
flows.
SCE's
electricity price exposure arises from energy purchased and sold in the MRTU market as a result of differences between SCE's load requirements versus the amount of energy delivered from its
generating facilities, existing bilateral contracts and CDWR contracts allocated to SCE.
A
portion of SCE's purchased power supply is subject to natural gas price volatility. SCE's natural gas price exposure arises from purchasing natural gas for generation at the Mountainview power plant
and peaker plants, bilateral contracts where pricing is based on natural gas prices (this includes contract energy prices for some renewable QFs which are based on the monthly index price of natural
gas delivered at the southern California border), and power contracts in which SCE has agreed to provide the natural gas needed for generation, referred to as tolling arrangements.
Notional Volumes of Derivative Instruments
The following table summarizes the notional volumes of derivatives used for hedging activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic Hedges |
|
Commodity
|
|
Unit of
Measure
|
|
September 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Electricity options, swaps and forward arrangements |
|
GWh |
|
|
12,721 |
|
|
14,868 |
|
Natural gas options, swaps and forward arrangements |
|
Bcf |
|
|
272 |
|
|
266 |
|
Congestion revenue rights |
|
GWh |
|
|
146,538 |
|
|
195,367 |
|
Tolling arrangements1 |
|
GWh |
|
|
115,681 |
|
|
116,398 |
|
|
|
- 1
- In
compliance with a CPUC mandate, SCE held an open, competitive solicitation that produced agreements with different project
developers who have agreed to construct new southern California generating resources. SCE has entered into a number of contracts which are recorded as derivative instruments. The
contracts provide for fixed capacity payments as well as pricing for energy delivered based on a heat rate and contractual operation and maintenance prices. However, due to uncertainty
regarding the availability of required emission credits, some of the new generating resources may not be constructed and the contracts associated with these resources could therefore
terminate, at which time SCE would no longer account for these contracts as derivatives.
7
Table of Contents
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
The following table summarizes the gross and net fair values of commodity derivative instruments at September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Assets
|
|
Derivative Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Short-
Term
|
|
Long-
Term
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
Short-
Term
|
|
Long-
Term
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
Net
Liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Non-trading activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic hedges |
|
$ |
69 |
|
$ |
192 |
|
$ |
261 |
|
$ |
230 |
|
$ |
1,298 |
|
$ |
1,528 |
|
$ |
1,267 |
|
|
Netting and collateral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
69 |
|
$ |
192 |
|
$ |
261 |
|
$ |
225 |
|
$ |
1,298 |
|
$ |
1,523 |
|
$ |
1,262 |
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the gross and net fair values of commodity derivative instruments at December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Assets
|
|
Derivative Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Short-
Term
|
|
Long-
Term
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
Short-
Term
|
|
Long-
Term
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
Net Liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Non-trading activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic hedges |
|
$ |
160 |
|
$ |
187 |
|
$ |
347 |
|
$ |
102 |
|
$ |
496 |
|
$ |
598 |
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
|
Income Statement Impact of Derivative Instruments
SCE recognizes realized gains and losses on derivative instruments as purchased-power expense and recovers these costs, subject to reasonableness
review, from ratepayers. As a result, realized gains and losses are not reflected in earnings, but may temporarily affect cash flows. Due to expected future recovery from ratepayers, unrealized gains
and losses are recorded as regulatory assets or liabilities and therefore are also not reflected in earnings. The results of derivative activities and related regulatory offsets are recorded in cash
flows from operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
The
following table summarizes the components of economic hedging activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Realized loss |
|
$ |
(53 |
) |
$ |
(113 |
) |
$ |
(116 |
) |
$ |
(307 |
) |
Unrealized gain (loss) |
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
(198 |
) |
|
(1,022 |
) |
|
428 |
|
|
|
Contingent Features/Credit-Related Exposure
Certain derivative instruments and power procurement contracts under SCE's power and natural gas hedging activities contain collateral requirements.
SCE has historically provided collateral in the form of cash and/or letters of credit for the benefit of counterparties. These requirements can vary
8
Table of Contents
depending
upon the level of unsecured credit extended by counterparties, changes in market prices relative to contractual commitments and other factors.
Certain
of these power contracts contain a provision that requires SCE to maintain an investment grade credit rating from each of the major credit rating agencies, referred to as a
"credit-risk-related contingent feature." If SCE's credit rating were to fall below investment grade, SCE may be required to pay the derivative liability or post additional
collateral. The aggregate fair value of all derivative liabilities with these credit-risk-related contingent features was $240 million and $91 million, as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, for which SCE has posted no collateral to its counterparties. If the credit-risk-related contingent
features underlying these agreements were triggered on September 30, 2010, SCE would be required to post $16 million of additional collateral based on the contractual terms.
Note 3. Liabilities and Lines of Credit
Long-Term Debt
In March 2010, SCE issued $500 million of 5.5% first and refunding mortgage bonds due in 2040. In May 2010, SCE reissued
$144 million of 5.0% tax-exempt pollution control bonds due in 2035. In August 2010, SCE issued $500 million of 4.5% first and refunding mortgage bonds due in 2040.
These issuances are part of long-term financing plans to fund SCE's capital program.
Credit Agreements and Short-Term Debt
In March 2010, SCE replaced its $500 million 364-day revolving credit facility with a new $500 million
three-year credit facility that terminates in March 2013.
At
September 30, 2010, letters of credit issued under SCE's credit facilities aggregated $11 million and are scheduled to expire in twelve months or less.
9
Table of Contents
Note 4. Income Taxes
Effective Tax Rate
The table below contains a reconciliation of income tax expense computed at the federal statutory income tax rate to the income tax provision from
continuing operations attributable to common shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Provision for income tax at federal statutory rate of 35% |
|
$ |
214 |
|
$ |
208 |
|
$ |
433 |
|
$ |
438 |
|
Increase (decrease) in income tax from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items presented with related state income tax, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global settlement related |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
Change in tax accounting method for asset removal costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
State tax net of federal benefit |
|
|
26 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
47 |
|
|
55 |
|
|
Health care legislation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
Property-related and other |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense from continuing operations |
|
$ |
205 |
|
$ |
236 |
|
$ |
338 |
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
612 |
|
$ |
595 |
|
$ |
1,235 |
|
$ |
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
33% |
|
|
40% |
|
|
27% |
|
|
13% |
|
|
|
The CPUC requires flow-through rate-making treatment for the current tax benefit arising from
certain property-related and other temporary differences which reverse over time. The accounting treatment for these temporary differences results in recording regulatory assets and liabilities for
amounts that would otherwise be recorded to deferred income tax expense.
Global Settlement
During 2010, SCE recognized a $95 million earnings benefit relating to the California impact of the federal Global Settlement, including
$53 million in the second quarter resulting from acceptance by the Franchise Tax Board of the tax positions finalized with the IRS in 2009 and $42 million in the third quarter resulting
from receipt of the final interest determination from the Franchise Tax Board. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009 SCE recognized a $300 million earnings benefit related to
the Global Settlement finalized with the IRS (described in "Item 8. SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsNote 4. Income Taxes" of the 2009
Form 10-K).
Change in Tax Accounting Method for Asset Removal Costs
During the second quarter of 2010 the IRS approved SCE's request to change its tax accounting method for asset removal costs primarily related to its
infrastructure replacement program. As a result, SCE recognized a $40 million earnings benefit ($28 million of which relates to asset removal costs incurred prior to 2010) from deducting
asset removal costs earlier in the construction cycle. These deductions are recorded on a flow-through basis.
Health Care Legislation
During the first quarter of 2010, SCE recognized a $39 million non-cash charge to reverse previously recognized federal tax
benefits eliminated by the federal health care legislation enacted in March 2010.
10
Table of Contents
The
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as modified by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, includes a provision that eliminates the federal tax deduction of retiree health care
costs to the extent those costs are eligible for federal Medicare Part D subsidies. Although this change does not take effect until January 1, 2013, SCE is required to recognize the full
accounting impact of the legislation in its financial statements in the period of enactment.
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
The following table provides a reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits from January 1 to September 30 for 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
$ |
482 |
|
$ |
2,066 |
|
Tax positions taken during the current year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases |
|
|
65 |
|
|
48 |
|
Tax positions taken during a prior year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases |
|
|
185 |
|
|
155 |
|
|
Decreases |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
(30 |
) |
Decreases for settlements during the period |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
(1,741 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30 |
|
$ |
650 |
|
$ |
498 |
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, if recognized, $191 million and $179 million of unrecognized tax
benefits would impact the effective tax rate.
Accrued Interest and Penalties
The total amount of accrued interest and penalties related to SCE's income tax liabilities was $105 million and $79 million as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
The
net after-tax interest and penalties recognized in income tax expense was a benefit of $27 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to an expense
of $5 million for the same period in 2009. Net after-tax interest and penalties recognized in income tax expense was a benefit of $48 million and $284 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
11
Table of Contents
Note 5. Compensation and Benefit Plans
Pension Plans and Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions
Pension Plans
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, SCE made 2010 plan year contributions of $72 million and expects to make
$25 million of additional contributions during the remainder of 2010. SCE recovers contributions made to most of its pension plans through CPUC-approved regulatory mechanisms.
Annual contributions to these plans are expected to be, at a minimum, equal to the related annual expense.
Expense
components are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
29 |
|
$ |
27 |
|
$ |
87 |
|
$ |
81 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
49 |
|
|
48 |
|
|
147 |
|
|
144 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
(40 |
) |
|
(147 |
) |
|
(120 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
2 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
12 |
|
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
6 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
Expense under accounting standards |
|
$ |
37 |
|
$ |
52 |
|
$ |
111 |
|
$ |
156 |
|
Regulatory adjustment deferred |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
(24 |
) |
|
(42 |
) |
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total expense recognized |
|
$ |
23 |
|
$ |
28 |
|
$ |
69 |
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
|
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, SCE made 2010 plan year contributions of $18 million and expects to make
$29 million of additional contributions during the remainder of 2010. SCE's annual contributions are recovered through CPUC-approved regulatory mechanisms and are expected to be, at
a minimum, equal to its total annual expense.
Expense
components are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
21 |
|
$ |
21 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
30 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
90 |
|
|
88 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
(20 |
) |
|
(75 |
) |
|
(60 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
(7 |
) |
|
(27 |
) |
|
(21 |
) |
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
8 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense |
|
$ |
11 |
|
$ |
20 |
|
$ |
33 |
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
|
12
Table of Contents
Stock-Based Compensation
During the first quarter of 2010, Edison International granted its 2010 stock-based compensation awards to SCE employees, which included stock
options, performance shares and restricted stock units. SCE's total stock-based compensation expenses (reflected in the caption "Operation and maintenance" on the consolidated statements of income)
was $6 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and $16 million and $15 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The income tax benefit recognized in the consolidated statements of income was $2 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and $6 million
for both the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. Excess tax benefits included in "Settlements of stock-based compensation net" in the financing section of the
consolidated statements of cash flows were $3 million and $6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Stock Options
The following is a summary of the status of Edison International stock options granted to SCE employees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
Options
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
8,749,015 |
|
$ |
31.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
2,157,031 |
|
|
33.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(2,688 |
) |
|
51.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(78,641 |
) |
|
31.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(396,184 |
) |
|
23.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate transfers net |
|
|
28,554 |
|
|
36.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
10,457,087 |
|
|
32.54 |
|
|
6.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
10,170,748 |
|
|
32.55 |
|
|
6.46 |
|
$ |
54,894,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
5,599,849 |
|
|
32.79 |
|
|
4.79 |
|
$ |
35,092,633 |
|
|
|
SCE's cash outflows to purchase Edison International shares in the open market to settle stock options exercised were $5 million and $2 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $12 million and $6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Cash inflows from participants to exercise stock options were $3 million and $1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $8 million and
$4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The tax benefit realized from options exercised was $1 million and less than $1 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $2 million and $1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
13
Table of Contents
Performance Shares
The following is a summary of the status of Edison International nonvested performance shares granted to SCE employees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Awards
|
|
Liability Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted-Average
Fair Value1
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
172,604 |
|
$ |
36.65 |
|
|
172,604 |
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
82,056 |
|
|
31.96 |
|
|
82,056 |
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(34,673 |
) |
|
55.87 |
|
|
(34,673 |
) |
|
|
|
Affiliate transfers net |
|
|
791 |
|
|
41.62 |
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
220,778 |
|
|
32.06 |
|
|
220,778 |
|
$ |
16.47 |
|
|
|
- 1
- The
current portion of nonvested performance shares granted to SCE employees and classified as liability awards is reflected in the caption
"Other current liabilities" and the long-term portion is reflected in "Pensions and benefits" on the consolidated balance sheets.
There were no performance shares paid in 2009 or 2010.
Note 6. Commitments and Contingencies
Lease Commitments
SCE entered into two 20-year power purchase contracts which are classified as capital leases and are expected to be recorded on the
consolidated balance sheets upon commencement of the contracts in 2012 and 2013. SCE's commitments upon commencement are estimated to be: $38 million in 2012, $98 million in 2013,
$120 million in 2014, and $2.1 billion for the period remaining thereafter (amounts representing executory costs and interest are $490 million and $911 million,
respectively).
Other Commitments
At September 30, 2010, SCE had power purchase contracts with additional commitments estimated to be: $30 million for the remainder of
2010, $94 million in 2011, $77 million in 2012, $53 million in 2013, $49 million in 2014, and $1 billion for the period remaining thereafter.
In
October 2010, SCE completed its 2010 annual request for offers and entered into new power purchase contracts with commitments estimated to be: $35 million in 2011, $122 million
in 2012, $163 million in 2013, and $69 million in 2014.
SCE
has letters of credit outstanding under a credit facility. For further discussion, see Note 3.
Indemnities
Indemnity Provided as Part of the Acquisition of Mountainview
In connection with the acquisition of the Mountainview power plant, SCE agreed to indemnify the seller with respect to specific environmental claims
related to SCE's previously owned San Bernardino Generating Station, divested by SCE in 1998 and reacquired as part of the Mountainview acquisition.
14
Table of Contents
SCE
retained certain responsibilities with respect to environmental claims as part of the original divestiture of the station. The aggregate liability for either party to the purchase agreement for
damages and other amounts is a maximum of $60 million. This indemnification for environmental
liabilities expires on or before March 12, 2033. SCE has not recorded a liability related to this indemnity.
Mountainview Filter Cake Indemnity
The Mountainview power plant utilizes water from on-site groundwater wells and City of Redlands ("City") recycled water for cooling
purposes. Unrelated to the operation of the plant, the groundwater contains perchlorate. The pumping of the water removes perchlorate from the aquifer beneath the plant and concentrates it in the
plant's wastewater treatment "filter cake." Use of this impacted groundwater for cooling purposes was mandated by Mountainview's California Energy Commission permit. SCE has indemnified the City for
cleanup or associated actions related to groundwater contaminated by perchlorate due to the disposal of filter cake at the City's solid waste landfill. The obligations under this agreement are not
limited to a specific time period or subject to a maximum liability. SCE has not recorded a liability related to this indemnity.
Other Indemnities
SCE provides other indemnifications through contracts entered into in the normal course of business. These are primarily indemnifications against
adverse litigation outcomes in connection with underwriting agreements, and specified environmental indemnities and income taxes with respect to assets sold. SCE's obligations under these agreements
may be limited in terms of time and/or amount, and in some instances SCE may have recourse against third parties for certain indemnities. The obligated amounts of these indemnifications often are not
explicitly stated, and the overall maximum amount of the obligation under these indemnifications cannot be reasonably estimated. SCE has not recorded a liability related to these indemnities.
Contingencies
In addition to the matters disclosed in these Notes, SCE is involved in other legal, tax and regulatory proceedings before various courts and
governmental agencies regarding matters arising in the ordinary course of business.
Environmental Developments
SCE is subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations, which typically require a lengthy and complex process for obtaining licenses, permits
and approvals and require it to incur substantial costs to operate existing facilities, construct and operate new facilities, and mitigate or remove the effect of past operations on the environment.
Possible
developments, such as the enactment of more stringent environmental laws and regulations, proceedings that may be initiated by environmental and other regulatory authorities, cases in which
new theories of liability are recognized, and settlements agreed to by other companies that establish precedent or expectations for the power industry, could affect the costs and the manner in which
business is conducted, and could cause substantial additional capital expenditures or operational expenditures or the ceasing of operations at certain facilities. There is no assurance that any
additional costs arising from such developments would be recovered from customers or that SCE's financial position, results of operations and cash flows would not be materially affected by such
developments.
15
Table of Contents
California Renewable Energy Developments
In
September 2010, CARB voted to adopt a Renewable Electricity Standard regulation, which would require most retail sellers of electricity in California to procure
33% of their electricity from eligible renewable energy resources by 2020. The potential impact of the Standard will depend on provisions, which have not yet been finalized, and therefore remains
uncertain. SCE believes that achieving a 33% renewables portfolio standard in this timeframe will be highly ambitious, given the magnitude of the infrastructure build-out required and the
slow pace of transmission permitting and approvals.
Greenhouse Gas Regulation
In
June 2010, the US EPA finalized the Prevention of Significant Deterioration ("PSD") and Title V greenhouse gas tailoring rule. The effective date of the
final rule is August 2, 2010. The emissions thresholds for CO2 equivalents in the final rule are as follows:
|
|
|
|
January June 2011 |
|
75,000 tons per year for new and modified sources already subject to PSD for pollutants other than greenhouse gases |
July 2011 June 2013 |
|
100,000 tons per year for new sources, and 75,000 tons per year for modified sources |
|
Numerous legal challenges to the greenhouse gas tailoring rule have been filed. As written, the rule applies to all sources meeting the thresholds that are
built or modified after January 1, 2011. If controls are required to be installed at SCE's facilities in the future in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to regulations issued by
the US EPA or others, the potential impact will depend on the nature of the controls applied, which remains uncertain.
Once-Through Cooling
In
May 2010, the California State Water Resources Board issued a final policy, which establishes closed-cycle wet cooling as required technology for retrofitting
existing once-through cooled plants like San Onofre and many of the existing fossil-fueled power plants along the California coast. The final policy requires an independent
engineering study to be completed prior to the fourth quarter of 2013 regarding the feasibility of compliance by California's two coastal nuclear power plants. Depending on the results of the study,
the required compliance may result in significant capital expenditures at San Onofre and may affect its operations. The policy may also significantly impact SCE's ability to procure generating
capacity from fossil-fueled plants that use ocean water in once-through cooling systems, system reliability and the cost of electricity to the extent other coastal power plants in
California are forced to shut down or limit operations. The policy has the potential to adversely affect California's nineteen once-through cooled power plants, which provide over
21,000 MW of combined, in-state generation capacity, including over 9,100 MW of capacity interconnected within SCE's service territory.
Environmental Remediation
SCE records its environmental remediation liabilities when site assessments and/or remedial actions are probable and a range of reasonably likely
cleanup costs can be estimated. SCE reviews its sites and measures the liability quarterly, by assessing a range of reasonably likely costs for each identified site using currently available
information, including existing technology, presently enacted laws and regulations, experience gained at similar sites, and the probable level of involvement and financial condition of other
potentially responsible parties. These estimates include costs for site investigations,
16
Table of Contents
remediation,
operations and maintenance, monitoring and site closure. Unless there is a probable amount, SCE records the lower end of this reasonably likely range of costs (reflected in "Other
long-term liabilities") at undiscounted amounts.
As
of September 30, 2010, SCE's recorded estimated minimum liability to remediate its 23 identified sites was $38 million. The ultimate costs to clean up SCE's identified sites may vary
from its recorded liability due to numerous uncertainties inherent in the estimation process, such as: the extent and nature of contamination; the scarcity of reliable data for identified sites; the
varying costs of alternative cleanup methods; developments resulting from investigatory studies; the possibility of identifying additional sites; and the time periods over which site remediation is
expected to occur. SCE believes that, due to these uncertainties, it is reasonably possible that cleanup costs at these identified sites could exceed its recorded liability by up to $228 million. The
upper limit of this range of costs was estimated using assumptions least favorable to SCE among a range of reasonably possible outcomes. In addition to its identified sites (sites in which the upper
end of the range of costs is at least $1 million), SCE also has 34 immaterial sites for which total liability ranges from $5 million (the recorded minimum liability) to $10 million.
The
CPUC allows SCE to recover 90% of its environmental remediation costs at certain sites, representing $34 million of its recorded liability, through an incentive mechanism (SCE may request
to include additional sites). Under this mechanism, SCE will recover 90% of cleanup costs through customer rates; shareholders fund the remaining 10%, with the opportunity to recover these costs from
insurance carriers and other third parties. SCE has successfully settled insurance claims with all responsible carriers. SCE expects to recover costs incurred at its remaining sites through customer
rates. SCE has recorded a regulatory asset of $39 million for its estimated minimum environmental cleanup costs expected to be recovered through customer rates.
SCE's
identified sites include several sites for which there is a lack of currently available information, including the nature and magnitude of contamination and the extent, if any, that SCE may be
held
responsible for contributing to any costs incurred for remediating these sites. Thus, no reasonable estimate of cleanup costs can be made for these sites.
SCE
expects to clean up its identified sites over a period of up to 30 years. Remediation costs in each of the next several years are expected to range from $3 million to
$18 million. Recorded costs were $3 million and $2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $7 million for both the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
Based
on currently available information, SCE believes it is unlikely that it will incur amounts in excess of the upper limit of the estimated range for its identified sites and, based upon the CPUC's
regulatory treatment of environmental remediation costs, SCE believes that costs ultimately recorded will not materially affect its results of operations, financial position or cash flows. There can
be no assurance, however, that future developments, including additional information about existing sites or the identification of new sites, will not require material revisions to such estimates.
Federal and State Income Taxes
SCE and its subsidiaries are included in Edison International's consolidated federal income tax and combined state franchise tax returns. Edison
International's consolidated federal income tax returns are currently under examination by the IRS for tax years 2003 through 2006 and are subject to examination through tax year 2009. Edison
International's combined California state franchise tax returns are subject to examination for tax years 1991 through 2009. For further discussion, see Note 4.
17
Table of Contents
2010 FERC Rate Case
In September 2009, the FERC issued an order allowing SCE to implement its proposed 2010 rates effective March 1, 2010, subject to
refund. The proposed rates would increase SCE's FERC revenue requirement by $107 million, or 24%, over the 2009 FERC revenue requirement
primarily due to an increase in transmission rate base, and would result in an approximate 1% increase to SCE's overall system average rate. SCE has terminated settlement negotiations and begun the
litigation process for the proposed 2010 rates. A final decision is expected in the second half of 2011.
FERC Transmission Incentives and CWIP Proceedings
In November 2007, the FERC issued an order granting ROE incentive adders, recovery of the ROE and incentive adders in the CWIP proceedings,
and 100% recovery of abandoned plant costs (if any) for three of SCE's transmission projects. The current ROE incentive adders are: 100 basis point adder for DCR, 125 basis point adder for Tehachapi,
and 75 basis point adder for Rancho Vista. The CPUC filed an appeal of the November order, which had been stayed pending final resolution by the FERC of the 2008 CWIP proceeding. In April 2010,
the FERC issued an order on SCE's 2008 CWIP proceeding. The order sets SCE's 2008 base ROE (before incentives) at 9.54% and establishes a methodology for determining the base ROE for 2009 and 2010
CWIP incentives. In May 2010, SCE filed an application for rehearing with the FERC. The order did not have a material impact on SCE's earnings or cash flows. The collected 2008 through 2010
CWIP revenue requirements are subject to refund, pending a final FERC order on these matters.
Navajo Nation Litigation
The Navajo Nation filed a complaint in June 1999 against SCE, among other defendants, arising out of the coal supply agreement for Mohave.
Subsequently, the Hopi Tribe was added as an additional plaintiff. As amended in April 2010, the Navajo Nation's complaint asserts claims for, among other things, interference with fiduciary
duties and contractual relations, fraudulent misrepresentations by nondisclosure, and various contract-related claims. The complaint claims that the defendants' actions prevented the Navajo Nation
from obtaining the full value in royalty rates for the coal supplied to Mohave. The complaint seeks damages of not less than $600 million, plus interest thereon, and punitive damages of not
less than $1 billion. No trial date has been set for this litigation. In April 2009, in a related case filed in December 1993 against the U.S. Government, the U.S. Supreme Court
found that the Navajo Nation did not have a claim for compensation. In September 2010, the Hopi Tribe settled all of its claims and the remaining parties agreed to engage in mediation. SCE
cannot predict the outcome of the Navajo Nation's complaint against SCE.
Nuclear Insurance
Federal law limits public liability claims from a nuclear incident to the amount of available financial protection, which is currently approximately
$12.6 billion. SCE and other owners of San Onofre and Palo Verde have purchased the maximum private primary insurance available ($375 million). The balance is covered by a loss sharing
program among nuclear reactor licensees. If a nuclear incident at any licensed reactor in the United States results in claims and/or costs which exceed the primary insurance at that plant site, all
nuclear reactor licensees could be required to contribute their share of the liability in the form of a deferred premium.
Based
on its ownership interests, SCE could be required to pay a maximum of approximately $235 million per nuclear incident. However, it would have to pay no more than approximately
$35 million per incident in any one year. If the public liability limit above is insufficient, federal law
18
Table of Contents
contemplates
that additional funds may be appropriated by Congress. This could include an additional assessment on all licensed reactor operators as a measure for raising further federal revenue.
Property
damage insurance covers losses up to $500 million, including decontamination costs, at San Onofre and Palo Verde. Decontamination liability and property damage coverage
exceeding the primary $500 million also has been purchased in amounts greater than federal requirements. Additional insurance covers part of replacement power expenses during an
accident-related nuclear unit outage. A mutual insurance company owned by entities with nuclear facilities issues these policies. If losses at any nuclear facility covered by the arrangement were to
exceed the accumulated funds for these insurance programs, SCE could be assessed retrospective premium adjustments of up to approximately $43 million per year. Insurance premiums are charged to
operating expense.
Spent Nuclear Fuel
Under federal law, the DOE is responsible for the selection and construction of a facility for the permanent disposal of spent nuclear fuel and
high-level radioactive waste. The DOE did not meet its contractual obligation to begin acceptance of spent nuclear fuel by January 31, 1998. Extended delays by the DOE have led to
the construction of costly
alternatives and associated siting and environmental issues. Currently, both San Onofre and Palo Verde have interim storage for spent nuclear fuel on site sufficient for the current license
period.
In
January 2004, SCE, as operating agent of San Onofre, filed a complaint against the DOE in the United States Court of Federal Claims seeking damages for the DOE's failure to meet its
obligation to begin accepting spent nuclear fuel from San Onofre. In June 2010, the United States Court of Federal Claims issued a decision granting SCE damages of approximately
$142 million to recover costs incurred through December 31, 2005, which has been appealed by the DOE. Additional legal action would be necessary to recover damages incurred after that
date. Any damages recovered would be returned to SCE ratepayers or used to offset past or future fuel decommissioning or storage costs for the benefit of the ratepayer.
19
Table of Contents
Note 7. Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
The following table provides changes in equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Attributable to SCE |
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
Preferred
and
Preference
Stock
|
|
Noncontrolling
Interest
|
|
Total
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
2,168 |
|
$ |
551 |
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
$ |
4,746 |
|
$ |
920 |
|
$ |
349 |
|
$ |
8,715 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
897 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Deconsolidation of variable interest entities (see Note 12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
(349 |
) |
Dividends declared on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
Dividends declared on preferred and preference stock not subject to mandatory redemption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
Stock-based compensation net |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Noncash stock-based compensation and other |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
2,168 |
|
$ |
566 |
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
$ |
5,496 |
|
$ |
920 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
9,133 |
|
|
|
The following table provides changes in equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Attributable to SCE |
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
Preferred
and
Preference
Stock
|
|
Noncontrolling
Interest
|
|
Total
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
2,168 |
|
$ |
532 |
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
$ |
3,827 |
|
$ |
920 |
|
$ |
380 |
|
$ |
7,813 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
1,181 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
(94 |
) |
Dividends declared on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
Dividends declared on preferred and preference stock not subject to mandatory redemption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
Stock-based compensation net |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Noncash stock based compensation
and other |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
2,168 |
|
$ |
548 |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
$ |
4,675 |
|
$ |
920 |
|
$ |
376 |
|
$ |
8,674 |
|
|
|
20
Table of Contents
Note 8. Supplemental Cash Flows Information
The following is SCE's supplemental cash flows information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30, |
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Cash payments (receipts) for interest and taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest net of amounts capitalized |
|
$ |
339 |
|
$ |
326 |
|
|
Tax receipts |
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
(690 |
) |
Noncash investing and financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Details of debt exchange: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pollution-control bonds redeemed |
|
$ |
(303 |
) |
$ |
|
|
|
Pollution-control bonds issued |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deconsolidation of variable interest entities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets other than cash |
|
$ |
306 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Liabilities and noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(398 |
) |
|
|
|
Dividends declared but not paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
Preferred and preference stock |
|
|
9 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
Note 9. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (referred to as
an "exit price"). Fair value for a liability should reflect the entity's nonperformance risk. Fair value is determined using a hierarchy to prioritize the inputs to valuation models. The hierarchy
gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs
(Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:
Level 1
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets and liabilities;
Level 2
Pricing inputs that include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either
directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the derivative instrument; and
Level 3
Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurements and unobservable.
SCE's
assets and liabilities carried at fair value primarily consist of derivative contracts, nuclear decommissioning trust investments and money market funds. Derivative contracts are primarily
commodity contracts for the purchase and sale of power and gas and include contracts for forward physical sales and purchases, options and forward price swaps which settle only on a financial basis
(including futures contracts). Derivative contracts can be exchange or over-the-counter traded.
21
Table of Contents
The
fair value of derivative contracts takes into account quoted market prices, time value of money, volatility of the underlying commodities, and other factors. Derivatives that are exchange traded
in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities are classified as Level 1. Investments in money market funds are generally classified as Level 1, as fair value is determined by
observable market prices in active markets. SCE's Level 2 derivatives primarily consist of natural gas financial swaps and natural gas physical trades for which SCE obtains the applicable Henry
Hub, basis, index, or forward market prices from the New York Mercantile Exchange and Intercontinental Exchange.
Level 3
includes the majority of SCE's derivatives, including over-the-counter options, bilateral contracts, capacity contracts, and QF contracts. The fair value of
these derivatives is determined using uncorroborated non-binding broker quotes and models which may require SCE to extrapolate short-term observable inputs in order to
calculate fair value. Broker quotes are obtained from several brokers and compared against each other for reasonableness.
Level 3
also includes derivatives that trade infrequently (such as CRRs in the California market and over-the-counter derivatives at illiquid locations) and
long-term power agreements. For illiquid CRRs, objective criteria are reviewed, including system congestion and other underlying drivers, and fair value is adjusted when it is concluded
that a change in objective criteria would result in a new valuation that better reflects fair value.
Changes
in fair values are based on the hypothetical sale of illiquid positions. For illiquid long-term power agreements, fair value is based upon a discounting of future electricity and
natural gas prices derived from a proprietary model using the risk free discount rate for a similar duration contract, adjusted for credit risk and market liquidity. Changes in fair value are based on
changes to forward market prices, including forecasted prices for illiquid forward periods. In circumstances where SCE cannot verify fair value with observable market transactions, it is possible that
a different valuation model could produce a materially different estimate of fair value. As markets continue to develop and more pricing information becomes available, SCE continues to assess
valuation methodologies used to determine fair value. Derivative contracts with counterparties that have significant nonperformance risk are classified as Level 3.
The
fair value of the derivative assets and liabilities are adjusted for nonperformance risk. To assess nonperformance risk, SCE considers default risk and the loss incurred if a counterparty
defaults. The fair value of derivative assets and derivative liabilities nonperformance risks was $1 million and $9 million, respectively at September 30, 2010 and was
$2 million and $7 million, respectively, at December 31, 2009.
The
nuclear decommissioning trust investments include equity securities, U.S. treasury securities and other fixed-income securities. Equity and treasury securities are classified as Level 1 as
fair value is determined by observable market prices in active or highly liquid and transparent markets. The remaining fixed-income securities are classified as Level 2. The fair value of these
financial instruments is based on evaluated prices that reflect significant observable market information such as reported trades, actual trade information of similar securities, benchmark yields,
broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, bids, offers and relevant credit information.
22
Table of Contents
The
following tables set forth assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010 |
|
(in millions)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Netting
and
Collateral1
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Assets at Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds2 |
|
$ |
825 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
CRRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal of derivative contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term disability plan |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nuclear decommissioning trusts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stocks3 |
|
|
1,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,840 |
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
Corporate bonds4 |
|
|
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
260 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
Short-term investments, primarily cash equivalents5 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal of nuclear decommissioning trusts |
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,327 |
|
Total assets6 |
|
$ |
2,937 |
|
$ |
1,292 |
|
$ |
193 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
4,422 |
|
|
|
Liabilities at Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(75 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
(75 |
) |
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
(18 |
) |
|
5 |
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
|
Tolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal of derivative contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
(1,208 |
) |
|
5 |
|
|
(1,523 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net assets (liabilities) |
|
$ |
2,937 |
|
$ |
972 |
|
$ |
(1,015 |
) |
$ |
5 |
|
$ |
2,899 |
|
|
|
23
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
(in millions)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Netting
and
Collateral1
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Assets at Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds2 |
|
$ |
360 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
CRRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
Tolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal of derivative contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term disability plan |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nuclear decommissioning trusts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stocks3 |
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
Corporate bonds4 |
|
|
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
240 |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
Short-term investments, primarily cash equivalents5 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal of nuclear decommissioning trusts |
|
|
2,013 |
|
|
1,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets6 |
|
$ |
2,381 |
|
$ |
1,119 |
|
$ |
337 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
3,837 |
|
|
|
Liabilities at Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
Tolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal of derivative contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
(448 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net assets (liabilities) |
|
$ |
2,381 |
|
$ |
969 |
|
$ |
(111 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
3,239 |
|
|
|
- 1
- Represents
cash collateral and the impact of netting across the levels of the fair value hierarchy. Netting among positions classified within
the same level is included in that level.
- 2
- Included
in cash and cash equivalents on SCE's consolidated balance sheet.
- 3
- At
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, approximately 67% of the equity investments were located in the United States.
- 4
- Corporate
bonds are diversified. At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, this category included $38 million and
$50 million, respectively, for collateralized mortgage obligations and other asset backed securities.
- 5
- Excludes
net assets of $20 million and $18 million of interest and dividend receivables and receivables related to pending
securities sales and payables related to pending securities purchases at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
- 6
- Excludes
$31 million and $32 million of cash surrender value of life insurance investments for deferred compensation at
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
24
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of Level 3 assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Fair value of derivative contracts, net asset (liability) at beginning of period |
|
$ |
(869 |
) |
$ |
117 |
|
$ |
(111 |
) |
$ |
(518 |
) |
Total realized/unrealized gains (losses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in regulatory assets and liabilities1 |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
(322 |
) |
|
(924 |
) |
|
270 |
|
Purchases and settlements, net |
|
|
12 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
48 |
|
Transfers into Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers out of Level 3 |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
25 |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value, net liability at end of period |
|
$ |
(1,015 |
) |
$ |
(175 |
) |
$ |
(1,015 |
) |
$ |
(175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change during the period in unrealized gains (losses) related to assets and liabilities held at the end of period |
|
$ |
(160 |
) |
$ |
(319 |
) |
$ |
(883 |
) |
$ |
302 |
|
|
|
- 1
- Due
to regulatory mechanisms, SCE's realized and unrealized gains and losses are recorded as regulatory assets and liabilities.
SCE determines the fair value of transfers in and out of each level at the end of each reporting period. There were no significant transfers between levels
during 2010 and 2009.
Nuclear Decommissioning Trusts
SCE is collecting in rates amounts for the future costs of removal of its nuclear assets, and has placed those amounts in independent decommissioning
trusts. Contributions are approximately $31 million per year. Funds collected, together with accumulated earnings, will be utilized solely for decommissioning. The CPUC has set certain
restrictions related to the investments of these trusts.
The
following table sets forth amortized cost and fair value of the trust investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Maturity
Dates1
|
|
September 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
September 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Stocks |
|
|
|
$ |
848 |
|
$ |
822 |
|
$ |
1,840 |
|
$ |
1,772 |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
2010 2049 |
|
|
618 |
|
|
545 |
|
|
733 |
|
|
634 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
2010 2044 |
|
|
327 |
|
|
309 |
|
|
418 |
|
|
393 |
|
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
2010 2040 |
|
|
284 |
|
|
287 |
|
|
320 |
|
|
308 |
|
Short-term investments and receivables/payables |
|
2010 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
2,111 |
|
$ |
1,996 |
|
$ |
3,347 |
|
$ |
3,140 |
|
|
|
- 1
- Maturity
dates as of September 30, 2010.
Trust fund earnings (based on specific identification) increase the trust fund balance and the ARO regulatory liability. Proceeds from sales of securities
(which are reinvested) were $302 million and $503 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively and $902 million and $1.8 billion for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Unrealized
25
Table of Contents
holding
gains, net of losses, were $1.2 billion and $1.1 billion at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Approximately 92% of the cumulative trust fund
contributions were tax-deductible.
The
following table sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the trust:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
3,083 |
|
$ |
2,673 |
|
$ |
3,140 |
|
$ |
2,524 |
|
|
Realized gains |
|
|
14 |
|
|
35 |
|
|
52 |
|
|
223 |
|
|
Realized losses |
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
(4 |
) |
|
(142 |
) |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) net |
|
|
233 |
|
|
296 |
|
|
90 |
|
|
444 |
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
(2 |
) |
|
(16 |
) |
|
(105 |
) |
|
Interest, dividends, contributions and other |
|
|
22 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
85 |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
3,347 |
|
$ |
3,025 |
|
$ |
3,347 |
|
$ |
3,025 |
|
|
|
Due to regulatory mechanisms, earnings and realized gains and losses (including other-than-temporary impairments) have no impact on
operating revenue or earnings.
Long-term Debt
The carrying amounts and fair values of long-term debt are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Long-term debt, including current portion |
|
$ |
7,626 |
|
$ |
8,740 |
|
$ |
6,740 |
|
$ |
7,202 |
|
|
|
Fair values of long-term debt are based on evaluated prices that reflect significant observable market information such as reported trades, actual
trade information of similar securities, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes of new issue prices and relevant credit information.
The
carrying value of trade receivables, payables and short-term debt approximate fair value and therefore are not included in the table above.
26
Table of Contents
Note 10. Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
Regulatory assets included on the consolidated balance sheets are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
September 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory balancing accounts |
|
$ |
207 |
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
Energy derivatives |
|
|
197 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory balancing accounts |
|
|
52 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes net |
|
|
1,838 |
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
Unamortized nuclear investment net |
|
|
301 |
|
|
340 |
|
|
Nuclear-related ARO investment net |
|
|
243 |
|
|
258 |
|
|
Unamortized coal plant investment net |
|
|
70 |
|
|
73 |
|
|
Unamortized loss on reacquired debt |
|
|
273 |
|
|
287 |
|
|
Pensions and other postretirement benefits |
|
|
999 |
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
Energy derivatives |
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
357 |
|
|
Environmental remediation |
|
|
39 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
211 |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,227 |
|
|
4,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total regulatory assets |
|
$ |
5,631 |
|
$ |
4,259 |
|
|
|
Regulatory liabilities included on the consolidated balance sheets are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
September 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory balancing accounts |
|
$ |
798 |
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
6 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
804 |
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory balancing accounts |
|
|
846 |
|
|
642 |
|
|
ARO |
|
|
220 |
|
|
171 |
|
|
Costs of removal |
|
|
2,597 |
|
|
2,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,663 |
|
|
3,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total regulatory liabilities |
|
$ |
4,467 |
|
$ |
3,695 |
|
|
|
27
Table of Contents
Note 11. Other Income and Expenses
Other income and expenses are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Other Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity AFUDC |
|
$ |
24 |
|
$ |
60 |
|
$ |
76 |
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance policies |
|
|
7 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
2 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
$ |
33 |
|
$ |
69 |
|
$ |
103 |
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Civic, political and related activities and donations |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
11 |
|
$ |
21 |
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
Marketing services |
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses |
|
$ |
10 |
|
$ |
13 |
|
$ |
39 |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
|
In July 2009, the Mountainview power plant was transferred to utility rate base pursuant to CPUC and FERC approvals which resulted in recognition of $50
million in Equity AFUDC during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009.
Note 12. Variable Interest Entities
Effective January 1, 2010, SCE adopted the FASB's new guidance regarding variable interest entities ("VIEs"). A VIE is defined as a legal entity whose equity owners do not have sufficient
equity at risk, or, as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack any of the following three characteristics: decision-making rights, the obligation to absorb losses, or the right to
receive the expected residual returns of the entity. The new guidance replaces the predominantly quantitative model for determining which reporting entity, if any, has a controlling financial interest
in a VIE with a qualitative approach. Under this new qualitative model, the primary beneficiary is identified as the variable interest holder that has both the power to direct the activities of the
VIE that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the
VIE. The primary beneficiary is required to consolidate the VIE unless specific exceptions or exclusions are met. Commercial and operating activities are generally the factors that most significantly
impact the economic performance of VIEs in which SCE has a variable interest. Commercial and operating activities include construction, operation and maintenance, fuel procurement, dispatch and
compliance with regulatory and contractual requirements.
Variable Interests in VIEs that are not Consolidated
Power Purchase Contracts
SCE has power purchase agreements ("PPAs") in which SCE has a variable interest in 17 VIEs, including 6 tolling agreements, where SCE provides the
natural gas to operate the plants, and 11 contracts with QFs (including the Big 4 projects) that contain variable pricing provisions based on the price of natural gas. SCE has concluded that it is not
the primary beneficiary of these VIEs since it
28
Table of Contents
does
not control the commercial and operating activities of these entities. In general, because payments for capacity are the primary source of income, the most significant economic activity for SCE's
VIEs is the operation and maintenance of the power plants. SCE does not have control over the operation and maintenance of the facilities considered VIEs and it does not bear operational risk of the
facilities. See further discussion of the Big 4 projects below.
As
of the balance sheet date, the carrying amount of assets and liabilities in SCE's consolidated balance sheet that relate to its involvement with VIEs result from amounts due under the PPAs or the
fair value of those derivative contracts, which are accounted for at fair value. See Note 9 for a discussion on nonperformance risk. Further, SCE has no residual interest in the entities and
has not provided or guaranteed any debt or equity support, liquidity arrangements, performance guarantees or other commitments associated with these contracts, other than the purchase commitments
described in Note 6. The aggregate capacity dedicated to SCE for these VIE projects was 4,045 MW at September 30, 2010 and the amounts that SCE paid to these projects were $205
million and $184 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $447 million and $414 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These amounts are recoverable in customer rates.
The
following table summarizes as of September 30, 2010, SCE's assets and liabilities and exposure to loss associated with SCE's variable interests in the VIEs described above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Short-
Term
|
|
Long-
Term
|
|
Short-
Term
|
|
Long-
Term
|
|
Maximum
Exposure
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Derivatives |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
$ |
1,064 |
|
$ |
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
$ |
1,064 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes as of December 31, 2009, SCE's assets and liabilities and exposure to loss associated with SCE's variable interests in the
VIEs described above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Short-
Term
|
|
Long-
Term
|
|
Short-
Term
|
|
Long-
Term
|
|
Maximum
Exposure
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Derivatives |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
$ |
17 |
|
$ |
385 |
|
$ |
43 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
$ |
56 |
|
$ |
385 |
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
|
Realized and unrealized losses are recovered or expected to be recovered from ratepayers in rates, subject to reasonableness review, and therefore are not
reflected in earnings.
Big 4 Projects Consolidated Prior to 2010
SCE has variable interests in the Big 4 Projects through power contracts between SCE and the Big 4 Projects containing variable contract pricing
provisions based on the price of natural gas. Prior to 2010, SCE had determined that it was the primary beneficiary of these four VIEs and, therefore,
29
Table of Contents
consolidated
these projects. SCE prospectively deconsolidated the Big 4 Projects at January 1, 2010 since it did not control the commercial and operating activities of these projects. The
deconsolidation did not result in a gain or loss.
SCE's
consolidated balance sheet captions impacted by VIE activities prior to 2010 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
(in millions)
|
|
Electric Utility
|
|
VIEs
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
SCE
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
370 |
|
$ |
92 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
462 |
|
Accounts receivable net |
|
|
689 |
|
|
62 |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
719 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
321 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
337 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
94 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
Nonutility property net of accumulated depreciation |
|
|
71 |
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
324 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
318 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
322 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
32,076 |
|
|
430 |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
32,474 |
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
1,031 |
|
$ |
59 |
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
$ |
1,058 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
632 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
637 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
3,181 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,198 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
|
32,076 |
|
|
430 |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
32,474 |
|
|
|
SCE's consolidated statements of income impacted by VIE activities prior to 2010 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2009 |
|
(in millions)
|
|
Electric Utility
|
|
VIEs
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
SCE
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Operating revenue |
|
$ |
3,021 |
|
$ |
166 |
|
$ |
(118 |
) |
$ |
3,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel |
|
|
97 |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
177 |
|
Purchased power |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
1,032 |
|
Operation and maintenance |
|
|
780 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
802 |
|
Depreciation, decommissioning and amortization |
|
|
294 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
302 |
|
Property and other taxes |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
2,381 |
|
|
110 |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
2,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
640 |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
696 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Other income |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
Interest expense net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
Other expenses |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
359 |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
415 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
Dividends on preferred and preference stock not subject to mandatory redemption |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income available for common stock |
|
$ |
346 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
346 |
|
|
|
30
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2009 |
|
(in millions)
|
|
Electric Utility
|
|
VIEs
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
SCE
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Operating revenue |
|
$ |
7,377 |
|
$ |
440 |
|
$ |
(286 |
) |
$ |
7,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel |
|
|
276 |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
|
|
533 |
|
Purchased power |
|
|
2,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
2,155 |
|
Operation and maintenance |
|
|
2,154 |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,222 |
|
Depreciation, decommissioning and amortization |
|
|
852 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
877 |
|
Property and other taxes |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
5,909 |
|
|
350 |
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
5,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,558 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
Other income |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
Interest expense net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(320 |
) |
Other expenses |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,181 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
Dividends on preferred and preference stock not subject to mandatory redemption |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income available for common stock |
|
$ |
1,053 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,053 |
|
|
|
31
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This MD&A contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking
statements reflect SCE's current expectations and projections about future events based on SCE's knowledge of present facts and circumstances and assumptions about future events and include any
statement that does not directly relate to a historical or current fact. Other information distributed by SCE that is incorporated in this report, or that refers to or incorporates this report, may
also contain forward-looking statements. In this report and elsewhere, the words "expects," "believes," "anticipates," "estimates," "projects,"
"intends," "plans," "probable," "may," "will," "could," "would," "should," and variations of such words and similar expressions, or discussions of strategy or of plans, are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. Such statements necessarily involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. Some of the risks, uncertainties
and other important factors that could cause results to differ, or that otherwise could impact SCE or its subsidiaries, include, but are not limited to:
-
- environmental laws and regulations, both at the state and federal levels, or changes in the application of those laws,
that could require additional expenditures or otherwise affect the cost and manner of doing business;
-
- cost of capital and the ability to borrow funds and access to capital markets on reasonable terms;
-
- the cost and availability of electricity including the ability to procure sufficient resources to meet expected customer
needs in the event of significant counterparty defaults under power-purchase agreements;
-
- changes in the fair value of investments and other assets;
-
- ability of SCE to recover its costs in a timely manner from its customers through regulated rates;
-
- decisions and other actions by the CPUC, the FERC and other regulatory authorities and delays in regulatory actions;
-
- changes in interest rates and rates of inflation, including those rates which may be adjusted by public utility
regulators;
-
- governmental, statutory, regulatory or administrative changes or initiatives affecting the electricity industry, including
the market structure rules applicable to each market and price mitigation strategies adopted by Independent System Operators and Regional Transmission Organizations;
-
- risks associated with operating nuclear and other power generating facilities, including operating risks; nuclear fuel
storage issues; failure, availability, efficiency, output, cost of repairs and retrofits in each case of equipment; and availability and cost of spare parts;
-
- availability and creditworthiness of counterparties and the resulting effects on liquidity in the power and fuel markets
and/or the ability of counterparties to pay amounts owed in excess of collateral provided in support of their obligations;
32
Table of Contents
-
- cost and availability of labor, equipment and materials;
-
- the ability to obtain sufficient insurance, including insurance relating to SCE's nuclear facilities and wildfire-related
liability, and to recover the costs of such insurance;
-
- ability to recover uninsured losses in connection with wildfire-related liability;
-
- effects of legal proceedings, changes in or interpretations of tax laws, rates or policies, and changes in accounting
standards;
-
- potential for penalties or disallowances caused by noncompliance with applicable laws and regulations;
-
- outcome of disputes with the IRS and other tax authorities regarding tax positions taken by Edison International;
-
- cost and availability of coal, natural gas, fuel oil, and nuclear fuel, and related transportation to the extent not
recovered through regulated rate cost escalation provisions or balancing accounts;
-
- cost and availability of emission credits or allowances for emission credits;
-
- transmission congestion in and to each market area and the resulting differences in prices between delivery points;
-
- ability to provide sufficient collateral in support of hedging activities and power and fuel purchases;
-
- weather conditions and natural disasters;
-
- risks inherent in the development of generation projects and transmission and distribution infrastructure replacement and
expansion projects, including those related to project site identification, financing, construction, permitting, and governmental approvals; and
-
- risks that competing transmission systems will be built by merchant transmission providers in SCE's territory.
Additional
information about risks and uncertainties, including more detail about the factors described above, are discussed throughout this MD&A and in the "Risk Factors" section included in
Part I, Item 1A of the 2009 Form 10-K. Readers are urged to read this entire report, including the information incorporated by reference, and carefully consider the
risks, uncertainties and other factors that affect SCE's business. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and SCE is not obligated to publicly update or revise
forward-looking statements. Readers should review future reports filed by SCE with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
This
MD&A for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 discusses material changes in the consolidated financial condition, results of operations and other
developments of SCE since December 31, 2009, and as compared to the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009. This discussion presumes that the reader has read
or has access to SCE's MD&A for the calendar year 2009 (the "year-ended 2009 MD&A"), which was included in the 2009 Form 10-K.
33
Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW
Introduction
This overview is presented in four sections:
-
- Highlights of operating results,
-
- SCE capital program,
-
- SCE 2012 General Rate Case, and
-
- Environmental developments.
The
overview is presented as an update to the overview presented in the 2009 Form 10-K. See pages 31 to 34 of the 2009 Form 10-K for additional information
on these topics.
Highlights of Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Change
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Net income available for common stock |
|
$ |
394 |
|
$ |
346 |
|
$ |
48 |
|
$ |
858 |
|
$ |
1,053 |
|
$ |
(195 |
) |
Non-Core Earnings (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Settlement |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
95 |
|
|
300 |
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
Tax impact of health care legislation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
Regulatory items |
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Core Earnings |
|
$ |
352 |
|
$ |
300 |
|
$ |
52 |
|
$ |
802 |
|
$ |
707 |
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
|
SCE's earnings are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles used in the United States. Management uses core earnings for financial
planning and for analysis of performance. Core earnings are also used when communicating with analysts and investors regarding SCE's earnings results to facilitate comparisons of the performance from
period to period. Core earnings are a non-GAAP financial measure and may not be comparable to those of other companies. Core earnings are defined as earnings attributable to SCE less
income or loss from significant discrete items that management does not consider representative of ongoing earnings, such as: settlement of prior year tax liabilities, changes in tax law and
nonrecurring regulatory or legal proceedings.
SCE's
2010 core earnings increased $52 million and $95 million for the quarter and year-to-date, respectively. The quarter increase was primarily due to higher
authorized revenue to support rate base growth and higher capitalized financing costs (AFUDC). The year-to-date increase was due to higher authorized revenue to support rate
base growth, lower income tax expense and higher capitalized financing costs (AFUDC). The year-to-date increase was partially offset by higher operating expenses that continue
to reflect the impact of curtailed spending last year due to the timing of the 2009 CPUC GRC decision. The year-to-date lower tax expense includes a change in method of tax
accounting for asset removal costs primarily related to SCE's infrastructure replacement program.
34
Table of Contents
Consolidated
non-core items for SCE included:
-
- An earnings benefit of $95 million recorded in 2010 relating to the California impact of the federal Global
Settlement, including $53 million in the second quarter resulting from acceptance by the Franchise Tax Board of the tax positions finalized with the IRS in 2009 and $42 million in the
third quarter resulting from receipt of the final interest determination from the Franchise Tax Board. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, SCE recognized a $300 million
earnings benefit related to the federal Global Settlement finalized with the IRS (described in "Item 8. SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsNote 4. Income Taxes"
of the 2009 Form 10-K).
-
- A non-cash charge of $39 million recorded in the first quarter of 2010 to reverse previously recognized
federal tax benefits eliminated by the federal health care legislation. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as modified by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, was enacted in
March 2010. The new health care legislation includes a provision that eliminates the federal tax deduction of retiree health care costs to the extent those costs are eligible for federal
Medicare Part D subsidies.
-
- An after-tax benefit of $46 million recorded in the third quarter of 2009 resulting from the transfer
of the Mountainview power plant to utility rate base pursuant to CPUC and FERC approvals.
SCE Capital Program
SCE's capital program continues to be focused primarily in five areas:
-
- Upgrading and constructing new transmission lines to strengthen system reliability and increase access to renewable
energy, including the Tehachapi, Devers-Colorado River and Eldorado-Ivanpah projects.
-
- Maintaining reliability and expanding capability of SCE's transmission and distribution system.
-
- Developing and installing up to 250 MW of utility-owned solar photovoltaic generating facilities (generally ranging
in size from 1 to 2 MW each) on commercial and industrial rooftops and other space in SCE's service territory.
-
- Replacing steam generators at San Onofre intended to enable operations until at least the end of its initial
license period in 2022. During the first quarter of 2010, SCE completed the replacement of the steam generators at San Onofre Unit 2, which was subsequently returned to service on
April 11, 2010. In October 2010, SCE began the process of installing the final two steam generators at San Onofre Unit 3 which are expected to be placed in service in early
2011. See "Results of OperationsElectric Utility Results of OperationsUtility Earning Activities" for discussion of the extended outage at San Onofre Unit 2.
-
- Installing "smart" meters in approximately 5.3 million households and small businesses, which is referred to as
EdisonSmartConnect. During the first nine months of 2010, SCE installed approximately 1.4 million smart meters, with cumulative installations totaling over 1.5 million.
SCE
plans to utilize cash generated from its operations and issuance of additional debt and preferred equity for its capital program. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, SCE issued
long-term debt of $1.1 billion to fund its capital program (see "Liquidity and Capital ResourcesHistorical Consolidated Cash FlowsCondensed Consolidated
Statement of Cash FlowsCash Flows Provided (Used) by Financing Activities" for further information).
35
Table of Contents
SCE's
capital investments (including accruals) during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 totaled $2.4 billion. SCE projects that capital investments will be in the range of
$3.3 billion to $4.0 billion in 2010 and in the range of $18 billion to $21.5 billion for 2010 2014. The rate of actual capital spending will be
affected by permitting, regulatory, market and other factors as discussed further
under "Liquidity and Capital ResourcesCapital Investment Plan" in the 2009 Form 10-K.
2012 General Rate Case
On July 19, 2010, SCE submitted to the CPUC's Division of Ratepayer Advocates its notice of intent ("NOI") to file a 2012 GRC. The NOI
indicates that SCE's GRC application, expected to be filed by year-end 2010, will request a 2012 base rate revenue requirement of $6.3 billion. After considering the effects of
sales growth, SCE's request would be a $903 million increase over projected 2011 base rate revenue. If the CPUC approves the requested rate increase and allocates the increase to ratepayer
groups on a system average percentage change basis, the percentage increases over current base rates and total rates are estimated to be 16.9% and 7.9%, respectively. The requested revenue requirement
increase is driven by the need to maintain system reliability, accommodate customer load growth, and increase operation and maintenance expenses primarily for capital-related projects, information
technology, insurance and pension contributions. The NOI also indicates that SCE's application will propose a post-test year ratemaking mechanism which would result in 2013 and 2014
incremental base revenue requirement increases, net of sales growth, of $305 million and $542 million, respectively, for the same reasons. The current schedule anticipates a final decision on
SCE's 2012 GRC by the end of 2011. SCE cannot predict the revenue requirement the CPUC will ultimately authorize or precisely when a final decision will be adopted.
Environmental Developments
For a discussion of environmental regulation developments regarding Greenhouse Gas Regulation, California Renewable Electricity Standard, and
California Once-Through Cooling Policy, see "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 6. Commitments and ContingenciesContingenciesEnvironmental
Developments."
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SCE's results of operations are derived mainly through two sources:
-
- Utility earning activities, which mainly represent CPUC- and FERC-authorized base rates, which
allow a reasonable return, and CPUC-authorized incentive mechanisms; and
-
- Utility cost-recovery activities, which mainly represent CPUC-authorized balancing accounts, which
allow recovery of costs incurred (including carrying costs) or provide mechanisms to track and recover or refund differences in forecasted and actual amounts. Balancing accounts (except for certain
capital-related projects) do not allow for a return.
Utility
earning activities include base rates that are designed to recover forecasted operation and maintenance costs, certain capital-related carrying costs, interest, taxes and a return, including
the return and taxes on capital projects recovered through balancing account mechanisms. Differences between authorized and actual results impact earnings. Also included in utility earning activities
are revenues or penalties related to incentive mechanisms, other operating revenue, and regulatory charges or disallowances, if any.
36
Table of Contents
Utility cost-recovery activities include rates which provide for recovery, subject to reasonableness review, of fuel costs, purchased power costs, certain operation
and maintenance expenses (including public purpose related program costs), and depreciation expense related to certain projects. There is no return earned on cost-recovery expenses.
Electric Utility Results of Operations
The following table is a summary of SCE's results of operations for the periods indicated. The presentation below separately identifies utility
earning activities and utility cost-recovery activities.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 versus September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2010
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Utility
Earning
Activities
|
|
Utility
Cost-
Recovery
Activities1,2
|
|
Total
Consolidated
|
|
Utility
Earning
Activities
|
|
Utility
Cost-
Recovery
Activities1,2
|
|
Total
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Operating revenue |
|
$ |
1,601 |
|
$ |
1,497 |
|
$ |
3,098 |
|
$ |
1,494 |
|
$ |
1,575 |
|
$ |
3,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel and purchased power |
|
|
|
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
1,209 |
|
Operation and maintenance |
|
|
541 |
|
|
262 |
|
|
803 |
|
|
506 |
|
|
296 |
|
|
802 |
|
Depreciation, decommissioning and amortization |
|
|
300 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
316 |
|
|
288 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
302 |
|
Property and other taxes |
|
|
64 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
65 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
905 |
|
|
1,497 |
|
|
2,402 |
|
|
854 |
|
|
1,519 |
|
|
2,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
640 |
|
|
56 |
|
|
696 |
|
Net interest expense and other |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
|
|
612 |
|
|
595 |
|
|
56 |
|
|
651 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
359 |
|
|
56 |
|
|
415 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
56 |
|
Dividends on preferred and preference stock not subject to mandatory redemption |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available for common stock |
|
$ |
394 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
394 |
|
$ |
346 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
346 |
|
|
|
Core Earnings3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
Non-Core Earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory items4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
Total SCE GAAP Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
346 |
|
|
|
- 1
- Effective
January 1, 2010, SCE deconsolidated the Big 4 projects which affects comparability of cost-recovery
activities (see "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 12. Variable Interest Entities" for further discussion). Included in the
37
Table of Contents
three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009, respectively, were the following amounts (including elimination entries) related to the Big 4 projects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2009
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Operating revenue |
|
$ |
48 |
|
$ |
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel |
|
|
80 |
|
|
257 |
|
Purchased power |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
(286 |
) |
Operation and maintenance |
|
|
22 |
|
|
68 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
8 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
64 |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
56 |
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
|
- 2
- Effective
July 1, 2009, SCE transferred Mountainview Power Company, LLC to SCE (see "Note 8. Property and Plant" in the 2009
Form 10-K for further discussion). As a result of the transfer and for comparability purposes, Mountainview's 2009 activities (zero for both operating revenue and total expenses for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 and $49 million for both operating revenue and total expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009) were reclassified from
cost-recovery activities to utility earning activities consistent with the 2010 regulatory recovery mechanism.
- 3
- See
use of Non-GAAP financial measures in "Management OverviewHighlights of Operating Results."
- 4
- The
$46 million non-core earnings benefit related to the transfer of the Mountainview power plant to utility rate base in the
third quarter of 2009 is reflected in the following captions: operating revenue of $(13) million; operation and maintenance of $(14) million; depreciation expense of $7 million;
net interest expense and other of $50 million; and an income tax benefit of $2 million.
Utility Earning Activities
Utility earning activities were primarily affected by the following:
-
- Higher operating revenue of $107 million primarily due to an increase related to implementation of the 2009 GRC
(effective January 1, 2009), which authorized a 4.25% increase in 2010 authorized revenue and an increase related to revenue requirements for capital projects recovered through
CPUC-authorized balancing accounts primarily related to the steam generator replacement project and the EdisonSmartConnectTM project.
-
- Higher operation and maintenance expense of $35 million primarily resulting from higher transmission and
distribution expenses primarily related to higher costs to support system reliability and infrastructure replacement and an increase in right of way costs.
-
- Higher net interest expense and other of $39 million primarily related to a decrease in AFUDC-equity earnings due
to the transfer of the Mountainview power plant to utility rate base in the third quarter of 2009, partially offset by a higher capitalized cost of equity (AFUDC) resulting from a higher
capitalization rate and level of construction in progress. See "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 11. Other Income and Expenses" for further detail of other income and
expenses.
See
"Income Taxes" below for discussion of lower income taxes during the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.
Utility Cost-Recovery Activities
Excluding the impact of deconsolidation of the Big 4 projects (see "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 12. Variable
Interest Entities"), utility cost-recovery activities were affected by lower purchased power expense of $32 million related to: lower realized losses of $60 million
38
Table of Contents
reflecting
the impact of higher natural gas prices and changes in SCE's hedge portfolio mix; and lower ISO-related and other energy costs of $45 million. These decreases were
partially offset by: higher QF purchased power expense of $35 million primarily due to higher kWh purchases and higher natural gas prices; and higher bilateral energy purchase expense of
$25 million, primarily resulting from a new contract.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 versus September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2010
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Utility
Earning
Activities
|
|
Utility
Cost-
Recovery
Activities1,2
|
|
Total
Consolidated
|
|
Utility
Earning
Activities
|
|
Utility
Cost-
Recovery
Activities1,2
|
|
Total
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Operating revenue |
|
$ |
4,175 |
|
$ |
3,329 |
|
$ |
7,504 |
|
$ |
3,951 |
|
$ |
3,580 |
|
$ |
7,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel and purchased power |
|
|
|
|
|
2,612 |
|
|
2,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,688 |
|
|
2,688 |
|
Operation and maintenance |
|
|
1,598 |
|
|
674 |
|
|
2,272 |
|
|
1,464 |
|
|
758 |
|
|
2,222 |
|
Depreciation, decommissioning and amortization |
|
|
905 |
|
|
40 |
|
|
945 |
|
|
836 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
877 |
|
Property and other taxes |
|
|
193 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
195 |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
187 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
2,696 |
|
|
3,327 |
|
|
6,023 |
|
|
2,487 |
|
|
3,486 |
|
|
5,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
1,479 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
1,481 |
|
|
1,464 |
|
|
94 |
|
|
1,558 |
|
Net interest expense and other |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
(2 |
) |
|
(246 |
) |
|
(214 |
) |
|
(4 |
) |
|
(218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
1,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,235 |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
90 |
|
|
1,340 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
90 |
|
|
1,181 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
90 |
|
Dividends on preferred and preference stock not subject to mandatory redemption |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available for common stock |
|
$ |
858 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
858 |
|
$ |
1,053 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,053 |
|
|
|
Core Earnings3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
707 |
|
Non-Core Earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
Tax impact of health care legislation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory items4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total SCE GAAP Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,053 |
|
|
|
- 1
- See
footnote 1 under "Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 versus September 30, 2009" table above.
- 2
- See
footnote 2 under "Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 versus September 30, 2009" table above.
- 3
- See
use of Non-GAAP financial measures in "Management OverviewHighlights of Operating Results."
- 4
- See
footnote 4 under "Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 versus September 30, 2009" table above.
Utility Earning Activities
Utility earning activities were primarily affected by the following:
-
- Higher operating revenue of $224 million primarily due to the following:
-
- $140 million increase related to implementation of the 2009 GRC (effective January 1, 2009), which
authorized a 4.25% increase in 2010 authorized revenue.
39
Table of Contents
-
- $35 million increase related to the 2009 and 2010 FERC rate cases effective March 1, 2009 and
March 1, 2010, respectively (see "Liquidity and Capital ResourcesRegulatory Proceedings2010 FERC Rate Case" for further discussion).
-
- $30 million increase related to revenue requirements for capital projects recovered through
CPUC-authorized balancing accounts primarily related to the steam generator replacement project and the EdisonSmartConnectTM project.
-
- Higher operation and maintenance expense of $134 million including the impact of curtailed spending last year due
to the timing of the 2009 GRC decision. The increase in operation and maintenance expense was primarily in the following areas:
-
- $60 million of higher transmission and distribution expenses. In addition to the impact of curtailed spending, the
2010 increase reflects higher costs to support system reliability and infrastructure replacement, increase in right of way costs, increases in preventive maintenance work costs, and line clearing
costs.
-
- $40 million of higher expenses related to higher general liability insurance, higher information technology costs,
a nuclear insurance refund received in 2009, and higher injury and damage claims.
-
- $15 million of higher generation expenses primarily resulting from a $10 million increase at
San Onofre mostly due to additional work identified during the Unit 2 scheduled outage and a $10 million increase primarily due to overhaul and outage costs at Four Corners. These
increases were partially offset by a $15 million hydrogen energy project payment made in the second quarter of 2009, which was subsequently approved for recovery through customer rates in
December 2009. During the San Onofre Unit 2 scheduled outage, SCE identified and completed additional work unrelated to the steam generator replacement that resulted in increased
operation and maintenance expense and extended the outage beyond SCE's initial estimated timeframe. San Onofre Unit 2 was subsequently returned to service on April 11, 2010.
The
first two of the four replacement steam generators were installed in San Onofre Unit 2 in the first quarter of 2010. In October 2010, SCE began the process of installing the
final two steam generators at San Onofre Unit 3 which are expected to be placed in service in early 2011. The CPUC has previously adopted a mechanism establishing thresholds for recovery
of SCE's incurred costs for the steam generator replacements. Costs above an established threshold will require a reasonableness review. No cost recovery will be allowed for costs incurred that exceed
an authorized cap. The determination of whether a reasonableness review of costs is necessary will be made after the steam generator replacement project is completed.
As
discussed in the 2009 Form 10-K, the NRC has continued to affirm that San Onofre is being operated safely. However, SCE has had to address a number of regulatory and
performance issues for which further corrective action is required to mitigate exposure to events that could have safety significance. In its 2010 mid-cycle performance review letter on
September 1st, the NRC noted that although San Onofre had developed corrective actions to resolve previously noted human performance and problem identification and
resolution problems, the corrective actions that had been implemented had not been fully effective. The NRC is conducting additional inspections over its baseline program, including inspections to
evaluate progress on these matters, and to assess actions taken to improve the working environment for employees to feel free to raise safety concerns. The NRC is also conducting additional public
meetings to discuss these issues. SCE continues to implement plans to address the identified issues; however, a number of these issues remain outstanding, and additional issues continue to be
identified. To address these regulatory and performance issues, SCE has applied increased management focus and other
40
Table of Contents
resources
to San Onofre, with an associated impact on operations and maintenance costs, as described in the 2009 Form 10-K. On September 2, 2010, SCE appointed a new
Chief Nuclear Officer on an interim basis, pending the search for a permanent replacement. SCE anticipates that its corrective actions, and related additional management focus and operations and
maintenance costs, will continue beyond 2010. If issues identified by the NRC remain uncorrected, these matters could have a material adverse effect on SCE.
-
- Higher depreciation expense of $69 million primarily related to increased capital investments, including
capitalized software costs.
-
- Higher net interest expense and other of $30 million primarily related to a decrease in AFUDC-equity earnings due
to the transfer of the Mountainview power plant to utility rate base in the third quarter of 2009, partially offset by a higher capitalized cost of equity (AFUDC) resulting from a higher
capitalization rate and level of construction in progress.
See
"Income Taxes" below for discussion of higher income taxes during the nine-months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.
Utility Cost-Recovery Activities
Excluding the impact of deconsolidation of the Big 4 projects (see "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 12. Variable Interest
Entities"), utility cost-recovery activities were primarily affected by:
-
- Lower purchased power expense of $104 million related to: lower realized losses of $191 million reflecting
the impact of higher natural gas prices and changes in SCE's hedge portfolio mix; and lower bilateral energy purchase expense of $70 million primarily due to decreased kWh purchases. These
decreases were partially offset by: higher QF purchased power expense of $115 million primarily due to higher kWh purchases and higher natural gas prices; and higher ISO-related and
other energy costs of $30 million, including replacement power costs related to the San Onofre Unit 2 scheduled outage.
-
- Fuel expense reflects lower costs at Four Corners (coal) of $20 million primarily resulting from the planned outage
and higher costs at Mountainview of $25 million resulting from higher natural gas prices.
Supplemental Operating Revenue Information
SCE's retail billed and unbilled revenue (excluding wholesale sales and balancing account (over)/undercollections) was $3.4 billion and
$7.8 billion for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010, respectively, compared to $3.3 billion and $7.5 billion for the respective periods
in 2009. The quarter and year-to-date increases reflect a rate increase of $312 million and $591 million, respectively, and a sales volume decrease of $226 million and
$314 million, respectively. The rate increase was due to higher system average rates for 2010 compared to the same periods in 2009 mainly due to the implementation of the CPUC 2009 GRC decision
and approved FERC transmission rate changes. The sales volume decrease was due to milder weather experienced during 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 and economic conditions. As a result of the
CPUC-authorized decoupling mechanism, SCE does not bear the volumetric risk related to electricity sales (see "Overview of Ratemaking Mechanisms" in the 2009 Form 10-K).
41
Table of Contents
Due
to warmer weather during the summer months and SCE's rate design, operating revenue during the third quarter of each year is generally higher than other quarters.
Amounts
SCE bills and collects from its customers for electric power purchased and sold by the CDWR to SCE's customers, CDWR bond-related costs and a portion of direct access exit fees are
remitted to the CDWR and are not recognized as revenue by SCE. The amounts collected and remitted to CDWR were $315 million and $896 million for the three- and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and $493 million and $1.4 billion for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009, respectively.
Effective January 1, 2010, the CDWR-related rates were decreased to reflect lower power procurement expenses and to refund CDWR overcollections to customers.
Income Taxes
SCE's income tax expense from continuing operations decreased $31 million and increased $179 million during the three- and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010, respectively. The 2010 income tax expense reflects: a $95 million earnings benefit relating to the California impact of the federal
Global Settlement, including $53 million in the second quarter resulting from the acceptance by the Franchise Tax Board of the tax positions finalized with the IRS in 2009 and
$42 million in the third quarter resulting from receipt of the final interest determination from the Franchise Tax Board; $39 million non-cash charge recorded in the first
quarter related to the federal health care legislation enacted in March 2010; and a $40 million earnings benefit due to a change in method of tax accounting for asset removal costs
primarily related to SCE's infrastructure replacement program. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, SCE recognized a $300 million earnings benefit related to the federal
Global Settlement finalized with the IRS. See "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 4. Income Taxes" for further discussion.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
SCE expects to fund its continuing obligations and projected capital investments for 2010 through cash and equivalents on hand, operating cash flows
and incremental capital market financings of debt and preferred equity. SCE also has availability under its credit facilities if additional funding and liquidity are necessary to meet operating and
capital requirements.
Available Liquidity
As of September 30, 2010, SCE had approximately $861 million of cash and equivalents and short-term investments. As of
September 30, 2010, SCE's long-term debt, including current maturities of long-term debt, was $7.6 billion.
42
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the status of SCE's credit facilities at September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Credit
Facilities1
|
|
|
|
Commitment |
|
$ |
2,894 |
|
Outstanding borrowings |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding letters of credit |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amount available |
|
$ |
2,883 |
|
|
|
- 1
- SCE
has two revolving credit facilities with various banks; a $2.4 billion five-year credit facility that terminates
in February 2013, with four one-year options to extend by mutual consent, and a $500 million three-year credit facility that terminates in
March 2013.
Debt Covenant
SCE has a debt covenant in its credit facilities that limits its debt to total capitalization ratio to less than or equal to 0.65 to 1. At
September 30, 2010, SCE's debt to total capitalization ratio was 0.46 to 1.
Regulatory Proceedings
Energy Efficiency Risk/Reward Incentive Mechanism
As discussed in the year-ended 2009 MD&A, the CPUC adopted an Energy Efficiency Risk/Reward Incentive Mechanism applicable to the 2006 -
2008 performance period. In September 2010, the CPUC issued a proposed decision and an alternate proposed decision for the final payment. The proposed decision, if adopted, would result in no
final payment, whereas, the alternate proposed decision, if adopted, would result in SCE receiving the previously projected $27 million final payment. SCE expects a CPUC decision on the final payment,
if any, in late 2010. There is no assurance that SCE will receive a final payment.
2010 FERC Rate Case
In September 2009, the FERC issued an order allowing SCE to implement its proposed 2010 rates effective March 1, 2010, subject to
refund. The proposed rates would increase SCE's FERC revenue requirement by $107 million, or 24%, over the 2009 FERC revenue requirement primarily due to an increase in transmission rate base,
and would result in an approximate 1% increase to SCE's overall system average rate. SCE has terminated settlement negotiations and begun the litigation process for the proposed 2010 rates. A final
decision is expected in the second half of 2011.
Dividend Restrictions
The CPUC regulates SCE's capital structure and limits the dividends it may pay Edison International. In SCE's most recent cost of capital proceeding,
the CPUC set an authorized capital structure for SCE which included a common equity component of 48%. SCE may
make distributions to Edison International as long as the common equity component of SCE's capital structure remains at or above the 48% authorized level on a 13-month weighted-average
basis. At September 30, 2010, SCE's 13-month weighted-average common equity component of total capitalization was 51.1% resulting in the capacity to pay $502 million in
additional dividends.
43
Table of Contents
SCE
paid dividends to its parent, Edison International, of $100 million in both January 2010 and in September 2010. Future dividend amounts and timing of distributions are
dependent upon several factors, including the actual level of capital investments, operating cash flows and earnings.
Income Tax Matters
In September 2010, President Obama signed the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, which extended the 50% bonus depreciation provision for an
additional year to include property purchased and placed into service by December 31, 2010. SCE expects that certain capital expenditures incurred during 2010 will qualify for the accelerated
bonus depreciation, which would provide additional cash flow benefits in 2010, estimated to be in the range of approximately $250 million to $300 million.
Margin and Collateral Deposits
Certain derivative instruments and power procurement contracts under SCE's power and natural gas hedging activities contain collateral requirements.
The table below illustrates the amount of collateral posted by SCE to its counterparties, as well as the potential collateral that would be required if SCE's credit rating fell below investment grade.
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
Collateral posted as of September 30, 20101 |
|
$ |
18 |
|
Incremental collateral requirements if SCE's credit rating was downgraded below investment grade |
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total posted and potential collateral requirements2 |
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
|
- 1
- Collateral
posted consisted of $5 million which was offset against net derivative liabilities and $13 million
provided to counterparties and other brokers (consisting of $2 million in cash reflected in "Other current assets" on the consolidated balance sheets and $11 million in
letters of credit).
- 2
- Total
posted and potential collateral requirements may increase by an additional $11 million, based on SCE's forward
position as of September 30, 2010, due to adverse market price movements over the remaining life of the existing contracts using a 95% confidence level.
Historical Consolidated Cash Flows
This section discusses consolidated cash flows from operating, financing and investing activities.
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30, |
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
2,656 |
|
$ |
3,281 |
|
Cash flows provided (used) by financing activities |
|
|
622 |
|
|
(1,854 |
) |
Cash flows used by investing activities |
|
|
(2,883 |
) |
|
(2,284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
395 |
|
$ |
(857 |
) |
|
|
44
Table of Contents
Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities decreased $625 million for the nine months ended 2010, compared to the same period in 2009 reflects
lower net tax receipts in 2010 primarily resulting from the impacts of the Global Settlement. As a result of the Global Settlement, SCE received net tax allocation payments from Edison International
of approximately $295 million and $875 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively. The 2010 change was also due to the timing of cash receipts and disbursements related to working capital
items.
Cash Flows Provided (Used) by Financing Activities
Financing activities for the first nine months of 2010 were as follows:
-
- Issued $1 billion of first refunding mortgage bonds due in 2040 to fund SCE's capital program.
-
- Reissued $144 million of tax-exempt pollution control bonds due in 2035 to fund SCE's capital program.
-
- Repaid $250 million of senior unsecured notes.
-
- Paid $200 million in dividends to Edison International.
Financing
activities for the first nine months of 2009 were as follows:
-
- Issued $500 million of first refunding mortgage bonds due in 2039 and $250 million of first and refunding
mortgage bonds due in 2014. The bond proceeds were used for general corporate purposes and to finance fuel inventories.
-
- Repaid a net $1.9 billion of short-term debt.
-
- Repaid $150 million of first and refunding mortgage bonds.
-
- Purchased $219 million of two issues of tax-exempt pollution control bonds and converted the issues to
a variable rate structure. As discussed above, SCE reissued $144 million of these bonds during the first nine months of 2010. SCE continues to hold the remaining $75 million of these
bonds which are outstanding and have not been retired or cancelled.
-
- Paid $200 million in dividends to Edison International.
Cash Flows Used by Investing Activities
Cash flows from investing activities are driven primarily by capital expenditures and funding of nuclear decommissioning trusts. Cash paid for
capital expenditures was $2.7 billion and $2.1 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, primarily related to transmission and distribution
investments. Net purchases of nuclear decommissioning trust investments and other were $133 million and $163 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
45
Table of Contents
Contractual Obligations and Contingencies
Contractual Obligations
SCE's long-term principal debt maturities plus interest payments as of September 30, 2010 are estimated to be: $102 million
for the remainder of 2010, $408 million in 2011, $408 million in 2012, $408 million in 2013, $1.4 billion in 2014, and $13 billion for the period remaining
thereafter. These amounts have been updated to reflect SCE's financing activities completed during 2010. For a discussion of issuances of long-term debt, see "SCE Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements Note 3. Liabilities and Lines of CreditLong-Term Debt."
For
a discussion of purchase obligations and capital lease obligations, see "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 6. Commitments and ContingenciesLease Commitments
and Other Commitments."
Contingencies
Developments related to SCE's 2010 FERC Rate Case, FERC Transmission Incentives and CWIP Proceedings, Navajo Nation Litigation and Spent Nuclear Fuel
are discussed in "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 6. Commitments and ContingenciesContingencies."
Environmental Remediation
As of September 30, 2010, SCE identified 23 sites for remediation and recorded an estimated minimum liability of $38 million. SCE
expects to recover 90% of its remediation costs at certain sites. SCE expects to clean up its identified sites over a period of up to 30 years. Remediation costs in each of the next several
years are expected to range from $3 million to $18 million. See "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 6. Commitments and ContingenciesContingencies"
for further discussion.
MARKET RISK EXPOSURES
For a detailed discussion of SCE's market risk exposures, including commodity price risk, credit risk and interest rate risk, see "Market Risk
ExposuresCommodity Price Risk" in the year-ended 2009 MD&A.
Interest Rate Risk
At September 30, 2010, the fair market value of SCE's long-term debt (including current portion of long-term debt) was
$8.7 billion, compared to a carrying value of $7.6 billion. At September 30, 2010, SCE did not believe that its short-term debt was subject to interest rate risk due
to the fair value being approximately equal to the carrying value.
46
Table of Contents
Commodity Price Risk
Natural Gas and Electricity Price Risk
The following table summarizes the fair values of outstanding derivative instruments used at SCE to mitigate its exposure to spot market prices. For
further discussion on fair value measurements, see "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 9. Fair Value Measurements."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Electricity options, swaps and forward arrangements |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
75 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
25 |
|
Natural gas options, swaps and forward arrangements |
|
|
81 |
|
|
338 |
|
|
86 |
|
|
171 |
|
Congestion revenue rights |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
Tolling arrangements1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
402 |
|
Netting and collateral |
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
261 |
|
$ |
1,523 |
|
$ |
347 |
|
$ |
598 |
|
|
|
- 1
- In
compliance with a CPUC mandate, SCE held an open, competitive solicitation that produced agreements with different project developers who
have agreed to construct new southern California generating resources. The contracts provide for fixed capacity payments as well as pricing for energy delivered based on a heat rate and contractual
operation and maintenance prices. However, due to uncertainty regarding the availability of required emission credits, some of the generating resources may not be constructed and the contracts
associated with these resources could therefore terminate, at which time SCE would no longer account for these contracts as derivatives.
The change in the fair value of derivative contracts for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Fair value of derivative contracts, net liability at January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
(251 |
) |
Total realized/unrealized net losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
Included in regulatory assets and liabilities1 |
|
|
(1,138 |
) |
Purchases and settlements, net |
|
|
122 |
|
Netting and collateral |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of derivative contracts, net liability at September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
(1,262 |
) |
|
|
- 1
- Due
to regulatory mechanisms, SCE's realized and unrealized gains and losses are recorded as regulatory assets and liabilities.
SCE recognizes realized gains and losses on derivative instruments as purchased power expense and recovers these costs, subject to reasonableness review, from
ratepayers. As a result, realized gains and losses are not reflected in earnings, but may temporarily affect cash flows. Due to expected future recovery from ratepayers, unrealized gains and losses
are recorded as regulatory assets or liabilities and therefore are not reflected in earnings. Realized losses on economic hedging activities were primarily due to settled natural gas prices being
lower than contract prices. Unrealized losses on economic hedging activities were primarily due to the declining gas and power prices related to SCE's new generation contracts and the decreasing
forward natural gas prices related to financial natural gas contracts.
47
Table of Contents
Credit Risk
Credit risk exposure from counterparties for power and gas trading activities is measured as the sum of net accounts receivable (accounts receivable
less accounts payable) and the current fair value of net derivative assets (derivative assets less derivative liabilities) reflected on the consolidated balance sheets. SCE enters into master
agreements which typically provide for a right of setoff. Accordingly, SCE's credit risk exposure from counterparties is based on a net exposure under these arrangements. As of September 30,
2010, the amount of balance sheet exposure as described above broken down by the credit ratings of SCE's counterparties, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
(in millions)
|
|
Exposure2
|
|
Collateral
|
|
Net Exposure
|
|
|
|
S&P Credit Rating1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A or higher |
|
$ |
187 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
187 |
|
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBB+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBB- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below investment grade and not rated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
187 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
|
- 1
- SCE
assigns a credit rating based on the lower of a counterparty's S&P or Moody's rating. For ease of reference, the above table
uses the S&P classifications to summarize risk, but reflects the lower of the two credit ratings.
- 2
- Exposure
excludes amounts related to contracts classified as normal purchases and sales and non-derivative contractual
commitments that are not recorded on the consolidated balance sheets, except for any related net accounts receivable.
The credit risk exposure set forth in the above table is composed of less than $1 million of net account receivables and $187 million representing
the fair value, adjusted for counterparty credit reserves, of derivative contracts.
The
CAISO comprises 94% of the total net exposure above and is mainly related to the CRRs' fair value (see "Commodity Price Risk" for further information).
NEW ACCOUNTING GUIDANCE
New accounting guidance is discussed in "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting
PoliciesNew Accounting Guidance."
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Information responding to this item is included in the MD&A under the heading "Market Risk Exposures" and is incorporated herein by this reference.
ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
SCE's management, under the supervision and with the participation of the company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has
evaluated the effectiveness of SCE's disclosure controls and
48
Table of Contents
procedures
(as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period
covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period, SCE's disclosure controls and procedures are
effective.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in SCE's internal control over financial reporting (as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or
15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, SCE's internal control over
financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Navajo Nation Litigation
Developments related to the Navajo Nation litigation are discussed in "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 6. Commitments and
ContingenciesContingenciesNavajo Nation Litigation."
California Coastal Commission Potential Environmental Proceeding
In May 2010, the California Coastal Commission issued a NOV to SCE, its contractor, and property owners related to activity on a
property that was used for equipment storage related to a nearby SCE electricity line undergrounding construction project. The NOV alleged that SCE, through its contractor, violated the
California Coastal Act by removing without the appropriate permits approximately one acre of vegetation from the property, which was located in a protected coastal zone within and adjacent to the City
of Newport Beach, California. In the NOV, the Coastal Commission indicated an interest in negotiating a settlement of the alleged violations but no specific settlement terms have been proposed nor has
a settlement been reached. The Coastal Act provides for penalties of up to $30,000 per violation, which may be increased by up to $15,000 per day per violation for knowing and intentional violations.
SCE has sought indemnification from its contractor for liability associated with the NOV.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act |
|
32 |
|
Statement Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
101 |
|
Financial statements from the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Edison International for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, filed on October 29, 2010, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated
Statements of Income; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements |
49
Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY |
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
By |
|
/s/ CHRIS C. DOMINSKI
Chris C. Dominski
Vice President and Controller
(Duly Authorized Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer) |
Date:
October 29, 2010
50