-
Annual Statements
-
»
Companies
-
»
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Co
-
»
Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Co - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)
Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One) |
ý |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 |
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File Number 1-2313
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
California |
|
95-1240335 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
2244 Walnut Grove Avenue
(P. O. Box 800)
Rosemead, California |
|
91770 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(626) 302-1212
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer ý
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o
No ý
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
|
|
|
Class |
|
Outstanding at August 2, 2010 |
Common Stock, no par value |
|
434,888,104 |
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
GLOSSARY
When the following terms and abbreviations appear in the text of this report, they have the meanings indicated below.
|
|
|
AB |
|
Assembly Bill |
AFUDC |
|
allowance for funds used during construction |
APS |
|
Arizona Public Service Company |
ARO(s) |
|
asset retirement obligation(s) |
Bcf |
|
Billion cubic feet |
CAA |
|
Clean Air Act |
CAIR |
|
Clean Air Interstate Rule |
CAISO |
|
California Independent System Operator |
CAMR |
|
Clean Air Mercury Rule |
CARB |
|
California Air Resources Board |
CDWR |
|
California Department of Water Resources |
CEC |
|
California Energy Commission |
CPUC |
|
California Public Utilities Commission |
CRRs |
|
congestion revenue rights |
DCR |
|
Devers-Colorado River |
DOE |
|
U. S. Department of Energy |
DRA |
|
Division of Ratepayer Advocates |
DWP |
|
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power |
ERRA |
|
energy resource recovery account |
FASB |
|
Financial Accounting Standards Board |
FERC |
|
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
FGIC |
|
Financial Guarantee Insurance Company |
Four Corners |
|
coal fueled electric generating facility located in Farmington, New Mexico in which SCE holds a 48% ownership interest |
GAAP |
|
generally accepted accounting principles |
Global Settlement |
|
A settlement between Edison International and the IRS that resolves all of SCE's federal income tax disputes and affirmative claims for tax years 1986 through 2002. |
GRC |
|
General Rate Case |
Investor-Owned Utilities |
|
SCE, SDG&E and PG&E |
IRS |
|
Internal Revenue Service |
ISO |
|
Independent System Operator |
kWh(s) |
|
kilowatt-hour(s) |
MD&A |
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this report |
Moody's |
|
Moody's Investors Service |
Mohave |
|
two coal fueled electric generating facilities that no longer operate located in Clark County, Nevada in which SCE holds a 56% ownership interest |
MRTU |
|
Market Redesign Technical Upgrade |
MW |
|
Megawatts |
MWh |
|
megawatt-hours |
NAAQS |
|
national ambient air quality standards |
NERC |
|
North American Electric Reliability Corporation |
Ninth Circuit |
|
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
NOx |
|
nitrogen oxide |
i
Table of Contents
|
|
|
NRC |
|
Nuclear Regulatory Commission |
NSR |
|
New Source Review |
Palo Verde |
|
large pressurized water nuclear electric generating facility located near Phoenix, Arizona in which SCE holds a 15.8% ownership interest |
PBOP(s) |
|
postretirement benefits other than pension(s) |
PBR |
|
Performance-based ratemaking |
PG&E |
|
Pacific Gas & Electric Company |
QF(s) |
|
qualifying facility(ies) |
RICO |
|
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization |
ROE |
|
return on equity |
S&P |
|
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services |
San Onofre |
|
large pressurized water nuclear electric generating facility located in South San Clemente, California in which SCE holds a 78.21% ownership interest |
SCAQMD |
|
South Coast Air Quality Management District |
SCE |
|
Southern California Edison Company |
SDG&E |
|
San Diego Gas & Electric |
SEC |
|
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission |
SIP(s) |
|
State Implementation Plan(s) |
SO2 |
|
sulfur dioxide |
SRP |
|
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District |
The Tribes |
|
Navajo Nation and Hopi Tribe |
TURN |
|
The Utility Reform Network |
US EPA |
|
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency |
VIE(s) |
|
variable interest entity(ies) |
|
ii
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Operating revenue |
|
$ |
2,247 |
|
$ |
2,273 |
|
$ |
4,406 |
|
$ |
4,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel |
|
|
94 |
|
|
156 |
|
|
175 |
|
|
356 |
|
Purchased power |
|
|
612 |
|
|
583 |
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
1,124 |
|
Operation and maintenance |
|
|
755 |
|
|
762 |
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
1,420 |
|
Depreciation, decommissioning and amortization |
|
|
320 |
|
|
289 |
|
|
629 |
|
|
574 |
|
Property and other taxes |
|
|
62 |
|
|
61 |
|
|
130 |
|
|
127 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
1,843 |
|
|
1,850 |
|
|
3,622 |
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
404 |
|
|
423 |
|
|
784 |
|
|
862 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
6 |
|
Other income |
|
|
35 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
70 |
|
|
56 |
|
Interest expense net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
(106 |
) |
|
(206 |
) |
|
(215 |
) |
Other expenses |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
(12 |
) |
|
(26 |
) |
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
319 |
|
|
336 |
|
|
625 |
|
|
689 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
134 |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
314 |
|
|
534 |
|
|
491 |
|
|
766 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
Dividends on preferred and preference stock not subject to mandatory redemption |
|
|
13 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available for common stock |
|
$ |
301 |
|
$ |
499 |
|
$ |
465 |
|
$ |
707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
314 |
|
$ |
534 |
|
$ |
491 |
|
$ |
766 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and postretirement benefits other than pensions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net loss included in net income |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
315 |
|
|
535 |
|
|
493 |
|
|
767 |
|
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to SCE |
|
$ |
315 |
|
$ |
513 |
|
$ |
493 |
|
$ |
733 |
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
85 |
|
$ |
462 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
6 |
|
|
9 |
|
Receivables, less allowances of $53 for uncollectible accounts at both dates |
|
|
731 |
|
|
719 |
|
Accrued unbilled revenue |
|
|
542 |
|
|
347 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
323 |
|
|
337 |
|
Prepaid taxes |
|
|
200 |
|
|
33 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
78 |
|
|
160 |
|
Regulatory assets |
|
|
338 |
|
|
120 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
51 |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
2,354 |
|
|
2,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonutility property less accumulated depreciation of $95 and $744 at respective dates |
|
|
68 |
|
|
324 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning trusts |
|
|
3,083 |
|
|
3,140 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
82 |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments and other assets |
|
|
3,233 |
|
|
3,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utility plant, at original cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transmission and distribution |
|
|
|
|
23,355 |
|
|
22,214 |
|
|
Generation |
|
|
|
|
2,715 |
|
|
2,667 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(6,047 |
) |
|
(5,921 |
) |
Construction work in progress |
|
|
2,682 |
|
|
2,701 |
|
Nuclear fuel, at amortized cost |
|
|
339 |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total utility plant |
|
|
23,044 |
|
|
21,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
197 |
|
|
187 |
|
Regulatory assets |
|
|
5,058 |
|
|
4,139 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
327 |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term assets |
|
|
5,582 |
|
|
4,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
34,213 |
|
$ |
32,474 |
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
(in millions, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
|
|
|
$ |
215 |
|
$ |
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
971 |
|
|
1,282 |
|
Accrued taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
9 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
162 |
|
Customer deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
238 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
102 |
|
Regulatory liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
367 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
445 |
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
2,759 |
|
|
3,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
7,129 |
|
|
6,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
3,959 |
|
|
3,651 |
|
Deferred investment tax credits |
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
97 |
|
Customer advances |
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
119 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
1,188 |
|
|
496 |
|
Pensions and benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
1,725 |
|
|
1,681 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
3,278 |
|
|
3,198 |
|
Regulatory liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
3,391 |
|
|
3,328 |
|
Other deferred credits and other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
1,730 |
|
|
1,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred credits and other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
15,489 |
|
|
14,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
25,377 |
|
|
23,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value (560,000,000 shares authorized; 434,888,104 shares issued and outstanding at each date) |
|
|
2,168 |
|
|
2,168 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
551 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
(19 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
5,204 |
|
|
4,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common shareholder's equity |
|
|
|
|
|
7,916 |
|
|
7,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred and preference stock not subject to mandatory redemption |
|
|
920 |
|
|
920 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
|
|
|
8,836 |
|
|
8,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,213 |
|
$ |
32,474 |
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, |
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
$ |
491 |
|
$ |
766 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, decommissioning and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
574 |
|
|
Regulatory impacts of net nuclear decommissioning trust earnings (reflected in accumulated depreciation) |
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
86 |
|
|
Other amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
55 |
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits |
|
|
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
447 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
15 |
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
40 |
|
|
Margin and collateral deposits net of collateral received |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
Prepaid taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
178 |
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
(181 |
) |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
(64 |
) |
|
Accrued taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
(50 |
) |
|
Derivative assets and liabilities net |
|
|
|
|
|
841 |
|
|
(626 |
) |
|
Regulatory assets and liabilities net |
|
|
|
|
|
(720 |
) |
|
761 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
(106 |
) |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
2,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt issued |
|
|
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
750 |
|
Long-term debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
(11 |
) |
Long-term debt repaid |
|
|
|
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
(151 |
) |
Bonds repurchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(219 |
) |
Short-term debt financing net |
|
|
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
(1,893 |
) |
Settlements of stock-based compensation net |
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
(1,694 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,757 |
) |
|
(1,402 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of nuclear decommissioning trust investments |
|
|
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
1,310 |
|
Purchases of nuclear decommissioning trust investments and other |
|
|
(697 |
) |
|
(1,415 |
) |
Sales of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
1 |
|
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
(1 |
) |
Customer advances for construction and other investments |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Effect of deconsolidation of variable interest entities |
|
|
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,937 |
) |
|
(1,517 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
(377 |
) |
|
(1,157 |
) |
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
1,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents, end of period |
|
|
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
$ |
454 |
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
SCE is a rate-regulated electric utility that supplies electric energy to a 50,000 square-mile area of central, coastal and southern California. SCE is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Edison International.
Basis of Presentation
SCE's significant accounting policies were described in Note 1 of "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" included in the 2009
Form 10-K. SCE follows the same accounting policies for interim reporting purposes, with the exception of accounting principles adopted as of January 1, 2010, as discussed
below in "New Accounting Guidance." This quarterly report should be read in conjunction with such financial statements.
In
the opinion of management, all adjustments, including recurring accruals, have been made that are necessary to fairly state the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for the periods covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. The results of operations
for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.
Management
has performed an evaluation of subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued.
The
December 31, 2009 condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
Cash and Equivalents
Cash equivalents included money market funds totaling $54 million and $360 million at June 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively. The carrying value of cash equivalents equals the fair value, as all investments have maturities of three months or less. For further discussion of money market funds, see
Note 9.
SCE
temporarily invests the ending daily cash balance in its primary disbursement accounts until required for check clearing. SCE reclassified $201 million and $224 million of checks
issued against these accounts, but not yet paid by the financial institution, from cash to accounts payable at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Margin and Collateral Deposits
Margin and collateral deposits include cash deposited with counterparties and brokers, and cash received from counterparties and brokers as credit
support under energy contracts. The amount of margin and collateral deposits generally varies based on changes in the fair value of the positions. SCE presents margin and cash collateral deposits
subject to a master netting arrangement netted with its
5
Table of Contents
derivative
positions on its consolidated balance sheets. The following table summarizes margin and collateral deposits provided to and received from counterparties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Collateral provided to counterparties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offset against derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
8 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Reflected in other current assets |
|
|
4 |
|
|
6 |
|
Collateral received from counterparties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reflected in other current liabilities |
|
|
57 |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
New Accounting Guidance
Accounting Guidance Adopted in 2010
ConsolidationImprovements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities
The
FASB issued an accounting standards update that changes how a company determines when an entity, that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting
(or similar rights), should be consolidated. The determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an ability to direct the activities of the
entity that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and whether the entity has an obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive expected returns of the entity. This guidance
requires a company to provide additional disclosures about its involvement with variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. SCE adopted this
guidance prospectively effective January 1, 2010. The impact of adopting this guidance resulted in the deconsolidation of projects related to four QF contracts. For further discussion, see
Note 12.
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
The
FASB issued an accounting standards update that provides for new disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements. The requirements, which SCE adopted
effective January 1, 2010, include separate disclosure of significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 and the reasons for the transfers. The update also clarified existing
disclosure requirements for the level of disaggregation, inputs and valuation techniques. In addition, effective January 1, 2011, the Level 3 reconciliation of fair value measurements
using significant unobservable inputs should include gross rather than net information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements. The guidance impacts disclosures only. For further discussion,
see Note 9.
Accounting Guidance Not Yet Adopted
Accounting pronouncements recently issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants and the SEC that are effective after June 30, 2010 are not expected to have a material effect on SCE's consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
6
Table of Contents
Note 2. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Commodity Price Risk
SCE is exposed to commodity price risk, which represents the potential impact that can be caused by a change in the market value of a particular
commodity. SCE's hedging program reduces ratepayer exposure to variability in market prices related to SCE's power and gas activities. As part of this program, SCE enters into energy options, swaps,
forward arrangements, tolling arrangements and congestion revenue rights ("CRRs"). These transactions are pre-approved by the CPUC or executed in compliance with CPUC-approved
procurement plans. SCE recovers its related hedging costs through the ERRA balancing account and as a result, exposure to commodity price risk is not expected to impact earnings, but may impact cash
flows.
SCE's
electricity price exposure arises from energy purchased and sold in the MRTU market as a result of differences between SCE's load requirements versus the amount of energy delivered from its
generating facilities, existing bilateral contracts and CDWR contracts allocated to SCE.
A
portion of SCE's purchased power supply is subject to natural gas price volatility. SCE's natural gas price exposure arises from purchasing natural gas for generation at Mountainview and peaker
plants, bilateral contracts where pricing is based on natural gas prices (this includes contract energy prices for most renewable QFs which are based on the monthly index price of natural gas
delivered at the southern California border), and power contracts in which SCE has agreed to provide the natural gas needed for generation, referred to as tolling arrangements.
Notional Volumes of Derivative Instruments
The following table summarizes the notional volumes of derivatives used for hedging activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity
|
|
Unit of
Measure
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Electricity options, swaps and forward arrangements |
|
GWh |
|
|
14,686 |
|
|
14,868 |
|
Natural gas options, swaps and forward arrangements |
|
Bcf |
|
|
278 |
|
|
266 |
|
Congestion revenue rights |
|
GWh |
|
|
165,097 |
|
|
195,367 |
|
Tolling arrangements1 |
|
GWh |
|
|
116,398 |
|
|
116,398 |
|
|
|
- 1
- In
compliance with a CPUC mandate, SCE held an open, competitive solicitation that produced agreements with different project developers who
have agreed to construct new southern California generating resources. SCE has entered into a number of contracts which are recorded as derivative instruments. The contracts provide for fixed capacity
payments as well as pricing for energy delivered based on a heat rate and contractual operation and maintenance prices. However, due to uncertainty regarding the availability of required emission
credits, some of the new generating resources may not be constructed and the contracts associated with these resources could therefore terminate, at which time SCE would no longer account for these
contracts as derivatives.
7
Table of Contents
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
The following table summarizes the gross and net fair values of commodity derivative instruments at June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Assets
|
|
Derivative Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Short-
Term
|
|
Long-
Term
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
Short-
Term
|
|
Long-
Term
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
Net
Liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Non-trading activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic hedges |
|
$ |
78 |
|
$ |
197 |
|
$ |
275 |
|
$ |
187 |
|
$ |
1,188 |
|
$ |
1,375 |
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
Netting and collateral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
78 |
|
$ |
197 |
|
$ |
275 |
|
$ |
179 |
|
$ |
1,188 |
|
$ |
1,367 |
|
$ |
1,092 |
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the gross and net fair values of commodity derivative instruments at December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Assets
|
|
Derivative Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Short-
Term
|
|
Long-
Term
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
Short-
Term
|
|
Long-
Term
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
Net
Liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Non-trading activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic hedges |
|
$ |
160 |
|
$ |
187 |
|
$ |
347 |
|
$ |
102 |
|
$ |
496 |
|
$ |
598 |
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
|
Income Statement Impact of Derivative Instruments
SCE recognizes realized gains and losses on derivative instruments as purchased-power expense and recovers these costs, subject to reasonableness,
from ratepayers. As a result, realized gains and losses are not reflected in earnings, but may temporarily affect cash flows. Due to expected future recovery from ratepayers, unrealized gains and
losses are recorded as regulatory assets or liabilities and therefore are not reflected in earnings. The results of derivative activities and related regulatory offsets are recorded in cash flows from
operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
The
following table summarizes the components of economic hedging activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Realized gain (loss) |
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
$ |
(96 |
) |
$ |
(62 |
) |
$ |
(194 |
) |
Unrealized gain (loss) |
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
293 |
|
|
(857 |
) |
|
626 |
|
|
|
Contingent Features/Credit-Related Exposure
Certain derivative instruments and power procurement contracts under SCE's power and natural gas hedging activities contain collateral requirements.
SCE has historically provided collateral in the form of cash and/or letters of credit for the benefit of counterparties. These requirements can vary
8
Table of Contents
depending
upon the level of unsecured credit extended by counterparties, changes in market prices relative to contractual commitments and other factors.
Certain
of these power contracts contain a provision that requires SCE to maintain an investment grade credit rating from each of the major credit rating agencies, referred to as a
"credit-risk-related contingent feature." If SCE's credit rating were to fall below investment grade, SCE may be required to pay the derivative liability or post additional
collateral. The aggregate fair value of all derivative liabilities with these credit-risk-related contingent features was $232 million and $91 million, as of
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, for which SCE has posted no collateral to its counterparties. If the credit-risk-related contingent features
underlying these agreements were triggered on June 30, 2010, SCE would be required to post $20 million of additional collateral.
Note 3. Liabilities and Lines of Credit
Long-Term Debt
In March 2010, SCE issued $500 million of 5.5% first and refunding mortgage bonds due in 2040. In May 2010, SCE reissued $144 million
of 5.0% tax-exempt pollution control bonds due in 2035. The proceeds from these bonds were used to repay commercial paper borrowings and for general corporate purposes.
Credit Agreements and Short-Term Debt
In March 2010, SCE replaced its $500 million 364-day revolving credit facility with a new $500 million
three-year credit facility that terminates in March 2013.
Short-term
debt is generally used to finance fuel inventories, balancing account under-collections and general, temporary cash requirements including power purchase payments. At
June 30, 2010, the outstanding short-term debt was $215 million at a weighted-average interest rate of 0.42%. This short-term debt is supported by
$2.9 billion of credit lines. At December 31, 2009, the outstanding short-term debt was zero.
At
June 30, 2010, letters of credit issued under SCE's credit facilities aggregated $11 million and were scheduled to expire in 2010.
9
Table of Contents
Note 4. Income Taxes
The table below contains a reconciliation of income tax expense computed at the federal statutory income tax rate to the income tax provision from continuing operations attributable to common
shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Provision for income tax at federal statutory rate of 35% |
|
$ |
112 |
|
$ |
110 |
|
$ |
219 |
|
$ |
229 |
|
Increase (decrease) in income tax from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items presented with related state income tax, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global settlement related |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
(300 |
) |
|
(53 |
) |
|
(300 |
) |
|
Change in tax accounting method for asset removal costs |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
State tax net of federal benefit |
|
|
19 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
27 |
|
Health care legislation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
Property-related and other |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
(31 |
) |
|
(52 |
) |
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense from continuing operations |
|
$ |
5 |
|
$ |
(198 |
) |
$ |
134 |
|
$ |
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
319 |
|
$ |
314 |
|
$ |
624 |
|
$ |
655 |
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
2% |
|
|
(63% |
) |
|
21% |
|
|
(12% |
) |
|
|
The CPUC requires flow-through rate-making treatment for the current tax benefit arising from certain property-related and other
temporary differences which reverse over time. The accounting treatment for these temporary differences results in recording regulatory assets and liabilities for amounts that would otherwise be
recorded to deferred income tax expense.
Global Settlement
During the second quarter of 2010, SCE recognized a $53 million earnings benefit resulting from acceptance by the California Franchise Tax
Board of the tax positions finalized
with the IRS in 2009 as part of the Global Settlement for tax years 1986 through 2002 (described in "Item 8. SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsNote 4. Income
Taxes" of the 2009 Form 10-K). Edison International is awaiting receipt of final interest calculations from the California Franchise Tax Board. During the second quarter of 2009,
SCE recognized a $300 million earnings benefit related to the federal Global Settlement finalized with the IRS.
Change in Tax Accounting Method for Asset Removal Costs
During the second quarter of 2010 the IRS approved SCE's request to change its tax accounting method for asset removal costs primarily related to its
infrastructure replacement program. As a result, SCE recognized a $40 million earnings benefit ($28 million of which relates to asset removal costs incurred prior to 2010) from deducting
asset removal costs earlier in the construction cycle. These deductions are recorded on a flow-through basis.
10
Table of Contents
Health Care Legislation
During the first quarter of 2010, SCE recognized a $39 million non-cash charge to reverse previously recognized federal tax
benefits eliminated by the federal health care legislation enacted in March 2010. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as modified by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act,
includes a provision that eliminates the federal tax deduction of retiree health care costs to the extent those costs are eligible for federal Medicare Part D subsidies. Although this change
does not take effect until January 1, 2013, Edison International is required to recognize the full accounting impact of the legislation in its financial statements in the period of enactment.
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
The following table provides a reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits from January 1 to June 30 for 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
$ |
482 |
|
$ |
2,066 |
|
Tax positions taken during the current year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases |
|
|
31 |
|
|
28 |
|
Tax positions taken during a prior year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases |
|
|
133 |
|
|
138 |
|
Decreases |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
(25 |
) |
Decreases for settlements during the period |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
(1,741 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30 |
|
$ |
536 |
|
$ |
466 |
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, if recognized, $160 million and $179 million of unrecognized tax benefits
would impact the effective tax rate.
Accrued Interest and Penalties
The total amount of accrued interest and penalties related to SCE's income tax liabilities was $71 million and $79 million as of
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
The
after-tax interest income recognized and included in income tax expense was $24 million and $292 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, and was $22 million and $289 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
11
Table of Contents
Note 5. Compensation and Benefit Plans
Pension Plans and Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions
Pension Plans
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, SCE made 2010 plan year contributions of $51 million and expects to make $30 million
of additional contributions during the remainder of 2010. SCE recovers contributions made to most of its pension plans through CPUC-approved regulatory mechanisms. Annual contributions to
these plans are expected to be, at a minimum, equal to the related annual expense.
Expense
components are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
29 |
|
$ |
27 |
|
$ |
58 |
|
$ |
54 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
49 |
|
|
48 |
|
|
98 |
|
|
96 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
(40 |
) |
|
(98 |
) |
|
(80 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
2 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
8 |
|
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
6 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
Expense under accounting standards |
|
$ |
37 |
|
$ |
52 |
|
$ |
74 |
|
$ |
104 |
|
Regulatory adjustment deferred |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
(37 |
) |
|
(28 |
) |
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total expense recognized |
|
$ |
23 |
|
$ |
15 |
|
$ |
46 |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
|
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, SCE made 2010 plan year contributions of $14 million and expects to make $29 million
of additional contributions during the remainder of 2010. SCE's annual contributions are recovered through CPUC-approved regulatory mechanisms and are expected to be, at a minimum, equal
to its total annual expense.
Expense
components are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
10 |
|
$ |
14 |
|
$ |
20 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
30 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
68 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
(21 |
) |
|
(50 |
) |
|
(42 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
(7 |
) |
|
(18 |
) |
|
(14 |
) |
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
8 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense |
|
$ |
11 |
|
$ |
31 |
|
$ |
22 |
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
|
12
Table of Contents
Stock-Based Compensation
During the first quarter of 2010, Edison International granted its 2010 stock-based compensation awards to SCE employees, which included stock
options, performance shares and restricted stock units. SCE's total stock-based compensation expenses (reflected in the caption "Other operation and maintenance" on the consolidated statements of
income) was $5 million and $6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $10 million and $9 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The income tax benefit recognized in the consolidated statements of income was $2 million for both the three months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, and $4 million for both the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Consistent with SCE's 2009 GRC, no stock-based compensation has been capitalized since December 31,
2008. Excess tax benefits included in "Settlements of stock-based compensation net" in the financing section of the consolidated statements of cash flows were $2 million
for both the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
Stock Options
The following is a summary of the status of Edison International stock options granted to SCE employees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
Options
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
8,749,015 |
|
$ |
31.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
2,082,894 |
|
|
33.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(57,796 |
) |
|
31.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(216,174 |
) |
|
22.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate transfers net |
|
|
28,554 |
|
|
36.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
10,586,493 |
|
|
32.38 |
|
|
6.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
10,301,100 |
|
|
32.38 |
|
|
6.70 |
|
$ |
40,387,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
5,764,144 |
|
|
32.52 |
|
|
5.09 |
|
|
27,650,336 |
|
|
|
SCE's cash outflows to purchase Edison International shares in the open market to settle stock options exercised were $4 million and $1 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $7 million and $5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Cash inflows
from participants to exercise stock options were $2 million and $1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $5 million and
$3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The tax benefit realized from options exercised was less than $1 million for both the three months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, and $1 million for both the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
13
Table of Contents
Performance Shares
The following is a summary of the status of Edison International nonvested performance shares granted to SCE employees and classified as equity
awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
Shares
|
|
Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
172,604 |
|
$ |
36.65 |
|
Granted |
|
|
78,765 |
|
|
32.31 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(34,180 |
) |
|
56.24 |
|
Affiliate transfers net |
|
|
791 |
|
|
41.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
217,980 |
|
|
32.19 |
|
|
|
The following is a summary of the status of Edison International nonvested performance shares granted to SCE employees and classified as liability awards (the
current portion is reflected in the caption "Other current liabilities" and the long-term portion is reflected in "Accumulated provision for pensions and benefits" on the consolidated
balance sheets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
Shares
|
|
Weighted-Average
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
172,604 |
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
78,765 |
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(34,180 |
) |
|
|
|
Affiliate transfers net |
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
217,980 |
|
$ |
20.37 |
|
|
|
There were no performance shares settled in 2009 or 2010.
Note 6. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
SCE entered into a 20-year power purchase contract which is classified as a capital lease and is expected to be recorded on the
consolidated balance sheets upon commencement of the contract in 2013. SCE's commitments upon commencement are estimated to be: $23 million in 2013, $44 million in 2014, and
$805 million for the period remaining thereafter.
Other Commitments
At June 30, 2010, SCE had power purchase contracts with additional commitments estimated to be: $67 million for the remainder of 2010,
$83 million in 2011, $67 million in 2012, $39 million in 2013, $39 million in 2014, and $613 million for the period remaining thereafter.
SCE
has letters of credit outstanding under a credit facility. For further discussion, see Note 3.
14
Table of Contents
Indemnities
Indemnity Provided as Part of the Acquisition of Mountainview
In connection with the acquisition of Mountainview, SCE agreed to indemnify the seller with respect to specific environmental claims related to SCE's
previously owned San Bernardino Generating Station, divested by SCE in 1998 and reacquired as part of the Mountainview acquisition. SCE retained certain responsibilities with respect to environmental
claims as part of the original divestiture of the station. The aggregate liability for either party to the purchase agreement for damages and other amounts is a maximum of $60 million. This
indemnification for environmental liabilities expires on or before March 12, 2033. SCE has not recorded a liability related to this indemnity.
Mountainview Filter Cake Indemnity
The Mountainview power plant utilizes water from on-site groundwater wells and City of Redlands ("City") recycled water for cooling
purposes. Unrelated to the operation of the plant, this water contains perchlorate. The pumping of the water removes perchlorate from the aquifer beneath the plant and concentrates it in the plant's
wastewater treatment "filter cake." Use of this impacted groundwater for cooling purposes was mandated by Mountainview's California Energy Commission permit. SCE has indemnified the City for cleanup
or associated actions related to groundwater contaminated by perchlorate due to the disposal of filter cake at the City's solid waste landfill. The obligations under this agreement are not limited to
a specific time period or subject to a maximum liability. SCE has not recorded a liability related to this indemnity.
Other Indemnities
SCE provides other indemnifications through contracts entered into in the normal course of business. These are primarily indemnifications against
adverse litigation outcomes in connection with underwriting agreements, and specified environmental indemnities and income taxes with respect to assets sold. SCE's obligations under these agreements
may be limited in terms of time and/or amount, and in some instances SCE may have recourse against third parties for certain indemnities. The obligated amounts of these indemnifications often are not
explicitly stated, and the overall maximum amount of the obligation under these indemnifications cannot be reasonably estimated. SCE has not recorded a liability related to these indemnities.
Contingencies
In addition to the matters disclosed in these Notes, SCE is involved in other legal, tax and regulatory proceedings before various courts and
governmental agencies regarding matters arising in the ordinary course of business. SCE believes that the outcome of these other proceedings will not materially affect its results of operations or
liquidity.
Environmental Developments
SCE is subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations, which typically require a lengthy and complex process for obtaining licenses, permits
and approvals and require it to incur substantial costs to operate existing facilities, construct and operate new facilities, and mitigate or remove the effect of past operations on the environment.
Possible
developments, such as the enactment of more stringent environmental laws and regulations, proceedings that may be initiated by environmental and other regulatory authorities, cases in which
new
15
Table of Contents
theories
of liability are recognized, and settlements agreed to by other companies that establish precedent or expectations for the power industry, could affect the costs and the manner in which
business is conducted, and could cause substantial additional capital expenditures or operational expenditures or the ceasing of operations at certain facilities. There is no assurance that any
additional costs arising from such developments would be recovered from customers or that SCE's financial position, results of operations and cash flows would not be materially affected by such
developments.
California Renewable Energy Developments
In
June 2010, CARB released a proposed Renewable Electricity Standard regulation, which would require most retail sellers of electricity in California to procure 33% of
their
electricity from eligible renewable energy resources by 2020. The California legislature is also contemplating legislation to adopt a 33% renewables portfolio standard that may supersede the CARB
regulation and impose its own program structure. Due to the possibility of legislation, the CARB has postponed voting on its proposed regulation until September 2010 at the Governor's request. SCE
believes that achieving a 33% renewables portfolio standard in this timeframe will be highly ambitious, given the magnitude of the infrastructure build-out required and the slow pace of
transmission permitting and approvals.
Greenhouse Gas Regulation
In
June 2010, the US EPA finalized the PSD and Title V greenhouse gas tailoring rule. The effective date of the final rule is August 2, 2010. The emissions thresholds
for CO2 equivalents in the final rule are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January June 2011 |
|
75,000 tons per year for new and modified sources already subject to PSD for pollutants other than greenhouse gases |
July 2011 June 2013 |
|
100,000 tons per year for new sources, and
75,000 tons per year for modified sources |
|
Petitions for judicial review of the greenhouse gas tailoring rule are to be submitted by August 2, 2010. Legal challenges to the greenhouse gas
tailoring rule have been filed.
Once-Through Cooling
In
May 2010, the California State Water Resources Board issued a final policy, which establishes closed-cycle wet cooling as required technology for retrofitting existing
once-through cooled plants like San Onofre and many of the existing fossil-fueled power plants along the California coast. The final policy requires an independent engineering study to be
conducted regarding the feasibility of compliance by California's two coastal nuclear power plants. Depending on the results of the study, the required compliance may result in significant capital
expenditures at San Onofre and may affect its operations. It may also significantly impact SCE's ability to procure generating capacity from fossil-fueled plants that use ocean water in
once-through cooling systems, system reliability and the cost of electricity to the extent other coastal power plants in California are forced to shut down or limit operations. The policy
has the potential to adversely affect California's nineteen once-through cooled power plants, which provide over 21,000 MW of combined, in-state generation capacity, including
over 9,100 MW of capacity interconnected within SCE's service territory.
16
Table of Contents
Environmental Remediation
SCE records its environmental remediation liabilities when site assessments and/or remedial actions are probable and a range of reasonably likely
cleanup costs can be estimated. SCE reviews its sites and measures the liability quarterly, by assessing a range of reasonably likely costs for each identified site using currently available
information, including existing technology, presently enacted laws and regulations, experience gained at similar sites, and the probable level of
involvement and financial condition of other potentially responsible parties. These estimates include costs for site investigations, remediation, operations and maintenance, monitoring and site
closure. Unless there is a probable amount, SCE records the lower end of this reasonably likely range of costs (reflected in "Other long-term liabilities") at undiscounted amounts.
As
of June 30, 2010, SCE's recorded estimated minimum liability to remediate its 23 identified sites was $38 million. The ultimate costs to clean up SCE's identified sites may vary from
its recorded liability due to numerous uncertainties inherent in the estimation process, such as: the extent and nature of contamination; the scarcity of reliable data for identified sites; the
varying costs of alternative cleanup methods; developments resulting from investigatory studies; the possibility of identifying additional sites; and the time periods over which site remediation is
expected to occur. SCE believes that, due to these uncertainties, it is reasonably possible that cleanup costs at these identified sites could exceed its recorded liability by up to
$223 million. The upper limit of this range of costs was estimated using assumptions least favorable to SCE among a range of reasonably possible outcomes. In addition to its identified sites
(sites in which the upper end of the range of costs is at least $1 million), SCE also has 34 immaterial sites for which total liability ranges from $5 million (the recorded minimum
liability) to $10 million.
The
CPUC allows SCE to recover 90% of its environmental remediation costs at certain sites, representing $32 million of its recorded liability, through an incentive mechanism (SCE may request
to include additional sites). Under this mechanism, SCE will recover 90% of cleanup costs through customer rates; shareholders fund the remaining 10%, with the opportunity to recover these costs from
insurance carriers and other third parties. SCE has successfully settled insurance claims with all responsible carriers. SCE expects to recover costs incurred at its remaining sites through customer
rates. SCE has recorded a regulatory asset of $39 million for its estimated minimum environmental-cleanup costs expected to be recovered through customer rates.
SCE's
identified sites include several sites for which there is a lack of currently available information, including the nature and magnitude of contamination and the extent, if any, that SCE may be
held responsible for contributing to any costs incurred for remediating these sites. Thus, no reasonable estimate of cleanup costs can be made for these sites.
SCE
expects to clean up its identified sites over a period of up to 30 years. Remediation costs in each of the next several years are expected to range from $3 million to
$18 million. Recorded costs were $3 million and $2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $3 million and $5 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Based
on currently available information, SCE believes it is unlikely that it will incur amounts in excess of the upper limit of the estimated range for its identified sites and, based upon the CPUC's
regulatory treatment of environmental remediation costs, SCE believes that costs ultimately recorded will not materially affect its results of operations, financial position or cash flows. There can
be no assurance, however, that future developments, including additional information about existing sites or the identification of new sites, will not require material revisions to such estimates.
17
Table of Contents
Federal and State Income Taxes
Edison International's federal income tax returns are currently under examination by the IRS for tax years 2003 through 2006 and are subject to
examination through tax year 2009. Edison International's California state income tax returns are subject to examination for tax years 1991 through 2009.
2010 FERC Rate Case
In September 2009, the FERC issued an order allowing SCE to implement its proposed 2010 rates effective March 1, 2010, subject to refund. The
proposed rates would increase SCE's FERC revenue requirement by $107 million, or 24%, over the 2009 FERC revenue requirement primarily due to an increase in transmission rate base, and would
result in an approximate 1% increase to SCE's overall system average rate. SCE has terminated settlement negotiations and begun the litigation process for the proposed 2010 rates. A final decision is
expected in the second half of 2011.
FERC Transmission Incentives and CWIP Proceedings
In November 2007, the FERC issued an order granting ROE incentive adders, recovery of the ROE and incentive adders in the CWIP proceedings, and 100%
recovery of abandoned plant costs (if any) for three of SCE's transmission projects: 125 basis point adder for both DPV2 and Tehachapi, and a 75 basis point adder for Rancho Vista. The
CPUC filed an appeal of this order, which had been stayed pending final resolution by the FERC of the 2008 CWIP proceeding. In April 2010, the FERC issued an order on SCE's 2008 CWIP proceeding. The
order sets SCE's 2008 base ROE (before incentives) at 9.54% and establishes a methodology for determining the base ROE for 2009 and 2010 CWIP incentives. In June 2010, SCE filed an application for
rehearing with the
FERC. The order did not have a material impact on SCE's earnings or cash flows. The outcomes of the 2009 and 2010 CWIP proceedings are still pending. SCE began collecting the 2010 CWIP revenue
requirements in rates on June 1, 2010. The collected 2008 through 2010 CWIP revenue requirements are subject to refund, pending a final FERC order on these matters.
Navajo Nation Litigation
The Navajo Nation filed a complaint in June 1999 against SCE, among other defendants, arising out of the coal supply agreement for Mohave.
Subsequently, the Hopi Tribe was added as an additional plaintiff. As amended in April 2010, the Navajo Nation's complaint asserts claims for, among other things, interference with fiduciary duties
and contractual relations, fraudulent misrepresentations by nondisclosure, and various contract-related claims. The complaint claims that the defendants' actions prevented the Navajo Nation from
obtaining the full value in royalty rates for the coal supplied to Mohave. The complaint seeks damages of not less than $600 million, plus interest thereon, and punitive damages of not less
than $1 billion. In April 2009, in a related case filed in December 1993 against the U.S. Government, the U.S. Supreme Court found that the Navajo Nation did not have a claim for compensation.
No trial date has been set for this litigation. SCE cannot predict the outcome of the Tribes' complaints against SCE.
Nuclear Insurance
Federal law limits public liability claims from a nuclear incident to the amount of available financial protection, which is currently approximately
$12.6 billion. SCE and other owners of San Onofre and Palo Verde have purchased the maximum private primary insurance available ($375 million). The balance is covered by a loss sharing
program among nuclear reactor licensees. If a nuclear incident at any licensed reactor in the United States results in claims and/or costs which exceed the primary
18
Table of Contents
insurance
at that plant site, all nuclear reactor licensees could be required to contribute their share of the liability in the form of a deferred premium.
Based
on its ownership interests, SCE could be required to pay a maximum of approximately $235 million per nuclear incident. However, it would have to pay no more than approximately
$35 million per incident in any one year. If the public liability limit above is insufficient, federal law
contemplates that additional funds may be appropriated by Congress. This could include an additional assessment on all licensed reactor operators as a measure for raising further federal revenue.
Property
damage insurance covers losses up to $500 million, including decontamination costs, at San Onofre and Palo Verde. Decontamination liability and property damage coverage exceeding the
primary $500 million also has been purchased in amounts greater than federal requirements. Additional insurance covers part of replacement power expenses during an accident-related nuclear unit
outage. A mutual insurance company owned by entities with nuclear facilities issues these policies. If losses at any nuclear facility covered by the arrangement were to exceed the accumulated funds
for these insurance programs, SCE could be assessed retrospective premium adjustments of up to approximately $43 million per year. Insurance premiums are charged to operating expense.
Spent Nuclear Fuel
Under federal law, the DOE is responsible for the selection and construction of a facility for the permanent disposal of spent nuclear fuel and
high-level radioactive waste. The DOE did not meet its contractual obligation to begin acceptance of spent nuclear fuel by January 31, 1998. Extended delays by the DOE have led to
the construction of costly alternatives and associated siting and environmental issues. Currently, both San Onofre and Palo Verde have interim storage for spent nuclear fuel on site sufficient for the
current license period.
In
January 2004, SCE, as operating agent, filed a complaint against the DOE in the United States Court of Federal Claims seeking damages for the DOE's failure to meet its obligation to begin accepting
spent nuclear fuel from San Onofre. In June 2010, the United States Court of Federal Claims issued a decision granting SCE damages of approximately $142 million to recover costs incurred
through December 31, 2005. Additional legal action would be necessary to recover damages incurred after that date. The decision is subject to appeal by the DOE. Any damages recovered would be
returned to SCE ratepayers or used to offset past or future fuel decommissioning or storage costs for the benefit of the ratepayer.
19
Table of Contents
Note 7. Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
The following table provides changes in equity for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Attributable to SCE |
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
Preferred
and
Preference
Stock
|
|
Noncontrolling
Interest
|
|
Total
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
2,168 |
|
$ |
551 |
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
$ |
4,746 |
|
$ |
920 |
|
$ |
349 |
|
$ |
8,715 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
491 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Deconsolidation of variable interest entities (see Note 12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
(349 |
) |
Dividends declared on preferred and preference stock not subject to mandatory redemption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
Stock-based compensation net |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Noncash stock-based compensation and other |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
2,168 |
|
$ |
561 |
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
$ |
5,204 |
|
$ |
920 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
8,836 |
|
|
|
The following table provides changes in equity for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Attributable to SCE |
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
Preferred and Preference Stock
|
|
Noncontrolling Interest
|
|
Total Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
2,168 |
|
$ |
532 |
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
$ |
3,827 |
|
$ |
920 |
|
$ |
380 |
|
$ |
7,813 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
766 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
(45 |
) |
Dividends declared on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
Dividends declared on preferred and preference stock not subject to mandatory redemption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
Stock-based compensation net |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash stock based compensation and other |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
2,168 |
|
$ |
540 |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
$ |
4,430 |
|
$ |
920 |
|
$ |
369 |
|
$ |
8,414 |
|
|
|
20
Table of Contents
Note 8. Supplemental Cash Flows Information
The following is SCE's supplemental cash flows information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, |
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Cash payments (receipts) for interest and taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest net of amounts capitalized |
|
$ |
162 |
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
Tax receipts |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
(868 |
) |
Noncash investing and financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Details of debt exchange: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pollution-control bonds redeemed |
|
$ |
(203 |
) |
$ |
|
|
|
Pollution-control bonds issued |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deconsolidation of variable interest entities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets other than cash |
|
$ |
306 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Liabilities and noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(398 |
) |
|
|
|
Dividends declared but not paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
Preferred and preference stock |
|
|
13 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
Note 9. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (referred to as
an "exit price"). Fair value for a liability should reflect the entity's nonperformance risk. Fair value is determined using a hierarchy to prioritize the inputs to valuation models. The hierarchy
gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs
(Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:
Level 1
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets and liabilities;
Level 2
Pricing inputs that include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either
directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the derivative instrument; and
Level 3
Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurements and unobservable.
SCE's
assets and liabilities carried at fair value primarily consist of derivative contracts, nuclear decommissioning trust investments and money market funds. Derivative contracts are primarily
commodity contracts for the purchase and sale of power and gas and include contracts for forward physical sales and purchases, options and forward price swaps which settle only on a financial basis
(including futures contracts). Derivative contracts can be exchange or over-the-counter traded.
21
Table of Contents
The
fair value of derivative contracts takes into account quoted market prices, time value of money, volatility of the underlying commodities, and other factors. Derivatives that are exchange traded
in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities are classified as Level 1. Investments in money market funds are generally classified as Level 1, as fair value is determined by
observable market prices in active markets. SCE's Level 2 derivatives primarily consist of natural gas financial swaps and natural gas physical trades for which SCE obtains the applicable Henry
Hub, basis, index, or forward market prices from the New York Mercantile Exchange and Intercontinental Exchange.
Level 3
includes the majority of SCE's derivatives, including over-the-counter options, bilateral contracts, capacity contracts, and QF contracts. The fair value of
these derivatives is determined using uncorroborated non-binding broker quotes (from one or more brokers) and models which may require SCE to extrapolate short-term observable
inputs in order to calculate fair value. Broker quotes are obtained from several brokers and compared against each other for reasonableness.
Level 3
also includes derivatives that trade infrequently (such as CRRs in the California market and over-the-counter derivatives at illiquid locations) and
long-term power agreements. For illiquid CRRs, objective criteria are reviewed, including system congestion and other underlying drivers, and fair value is adjusted when it is concluded
that a change in objective criteria would result in a new valuation that better reflects fair value.
Changes
in fair values are based on the hypothetical sale of illiquid positions. For illiquid long-term power agreements, fair value is based upon a discounting of future electricity and
natural gas prices derived from a proprietary model using the risk free discount rate for a similar duration contract, adjusted for credit risk and market liquidity. Changes in fair value are based on
changes to forward market prices, including forecasted prices for illiquid forward periods. In circumstances where SCE cannot verify fair value with observable market transactions, it is possible that
a different valuation model could produce a materially different estimate of fair value. As markets continue to develop and more pricing information becomes available, SCE continues to assess
valuation methodologies used to determine fair value. Derivative contracts with counterparties that have significant nonperformance risk are classified as Level 3.
In
assessing nonperformance risks, SCE reviews credit ratings of counterparties (and related default rates based on such credit ratings). The fair value of derivative assets and derivative liabilities
nonperformance risks was $1 million and $9 million, respectively at June 30, 2010 and was $2 million and $7 million, respectively, at December 31, 2009.
The
nuclear decommissioning trust investments include equity securities, U.S. treasury securities and other fixed-income securities. Equity and treasury securities are classified as Level 1 as
fair value is determined by observable market prices in active or highly liquid and transparent markets. The remaining fixed-income securities are classified as Level 2. The fair value of these
financial instruments is based on evaluated prices that reflect significant observable market information such as reported trades, actual trade information of similar securities, benchmark yields,
broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, bids, offers and relevant credit information.
22
Table of Contents
The
following tables set forth assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010 |
|
(in millions)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Netting and
Collateral1
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Assets at Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds2 |
|
$ |
54 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
CRRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal of derivative contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term disability plan |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nuclear decommissioning trusts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stocks3 |
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
Corporate bonds4 |
|
|
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
262 |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
Short-term investments, primarily cash equivalents5 |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal of nuclear decommissioning trusts |
|
|
1,897 |
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets6 |
|
$ |
1,960 |
|
$ |
1,165 |
|
$ |
274 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
3,399 |
|
|
|
Liabilities at Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(89 |
) |
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
(88 |
) |
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
(48 |
) |
|
7 |
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
Tolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,006 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1,006 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal of derivative contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
(1,143 |
) |
|
8 |
|
|
(1,367 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net assets (liabilities) |
|
$ |
1,960 |
|
$ |
933 |
|
$ |
(869 |
) |
$ |
8 |
|
$ |
2,032 |
|
|
|
23
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
(in millions)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Netting and
Collateral1
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Assets at Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds2 |
|
$ |
360 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
CRRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
Tolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal of derivative contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term disability plan |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nuclear decommissioning trusts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stocks3 |
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
Corporate bonds4 |
|
|
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
240 |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
Short-term investments, primarily cash equivalents5 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal of nuclear decommissioning trusts |
|
|
2,013 |
|
|
1,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets6 |
|
$ |
2,381 |
|
$ |
1,119 |
|
$ |
337 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
3,837 |
|
|
|
Liabilities at Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
Tolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal of derivative contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
(448 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net assets (liabilities) |
|
$ |
2,381 |
|
$ |
969 |
|
$ |
(111 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
3,239 |
|
|
|
- 1
- Represents
cash collateral and the impact of netting across the levels of the fair value hierarchy. Netting among positions classified within
the same level is included in that level.
- 2
- Included
in cash and cash equivalents on SCE's consolidated balance sheet.
- 3
- At
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, approximately 68% and 67% of the equity investments were located in the United States,
respectively.
- 4
- Corporate
bonds are diversified. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, this category included $37 million and
$50 million, respectively, for collateralized mortgage obligations and other asset backed securities.
- 5
- Excludes
net assets of $22 million and $18 million of interest and dividend receivables and receivables related to pending
securities sales and payables related to pending securities purchases at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
- 6
- Excludes
$32 million of cash surrender value of life insurance investments for deferred compensation at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009.
24
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of Level 3 assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Fair value of derivative contracts, net liability at beginning of period |
|
$ |
(596 |
) |
$ |
(126 |
) |
$ |
(111 |
) |
$ |
(518 |
) |
Total realized/unrealized gains (losses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in regulatory assets and liabilities1 |
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
204 |
|
|
(781 |
) |
|
591 |
|
Purchases and settlements, net |
|
|
21 |
|
|
39 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
44 |
|
Transfers into Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers out of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value, net asset (liability) at end of period |
|
$ |
(869 |
) |
$ |
117 |
|
$ |
(869 |
) |
$ |
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change during the period in unrealized gains (losses) related to assets and liabilities held at the end of period |
|
$ |
(285 |
) |
$ |
212 |
|
$ |
(749 |
)` |
$ |
604 |
|
|
|
- 1
- Due
to regulatory mechanisms, SCE's realized and unrealized gains and losses are recorded as regulatory assets and liabilities.
There were no transfers between levels during the first six months of 2010. SCE determines the fair value for transfers in and transfers out of each level as of
the end of each reporting period.
Nuclear Decommissioning Trusts
SCE is collecting in rates amounts for the future costs of removal of its nuclear assets, and has placed those amounts in independent decommissioning
trusts. Contributions are approximately $46 million per year. Funds collected, together with accumulated earnings, will be utilized solely for decommissioning. The CPUC has set certain
restrictions related to the investments of these trusts.
The
following table sets forth amortized cost and fair value of the trust investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Maturity
Dates1
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Stocks |
|
|
|
|
$ |
843 |
|
$ |
822 |
|
$ |
1,635 |
|
$ |
1,772 |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
2010 2047 |
|
|
602 |
|
|
545 |
|
|
703 |
|
|
634 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
2010 2044 |
|
|
317 |
|
|
309 |
|
|
395 |
|
|
393 |
|
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
2010 2039 |
|
|
285 |
|
|
287 |
|
|
316 |
|
|
308 |
|
Short-term investments and receivables/payables |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,080 |
|
$ |
1,996 |
|
$ |
3,083 |
|
$ |
3,140 |
|
|
|
- 1
- Maturity
dates as of June 30, 2010.
Trust fund earnings (based on specific identification) increase the trust fund balance and the ARO regulatory liability. Proceeds from sales of securities
(which are reinvested) were $315 million and
25
Table of Contents
$652 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively and $600 million and $1.3 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. Unrealized holding gains, net of losses, were $1.0 billion and $1.1 billion at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Approximately 92% of the
cumulative trust fund contributions were tax-deductible.
The
following table sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the trust:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
3,248 |
|
$ |
2,399 |
|
$ |
3,140 |
|
$ |
2,524 |
|
Realized gains |
|
|
18 |
|
|
115 |
|
|
38 |
|
|
189 |
|
Realized losses |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
(77 |
) |
|
(4 |
) |
|
(140 |
) |
Unrealized gains (losses) net |
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
220 |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
148 |
|
Other-than-temporary impairment |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
(9 |
) |
|
(11 |
) |
|
(103 |
) |
Interest, dividends, contributions and other |
|
|
34 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
63 |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
3,083 |
|
$ |
2,673 |
|
$ |
3,083 |
|
$ |
2,673 |
|
|
|
Due to regulatory mechanisms, earnings and realized gains and losses (including other-than-temporary impairments) have no impact on
operating revenue or earnings.
Long-term Debt
The carrying amounts and fair values of long-term debt are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Long-term debt, including current portion |
|
$ |
7,129 |
|
$ |
8,056 |
|
$ |
6,740 |
|
$ |
7,202 |
|
|
|
Fair values of long-term debt are based on evaluated prices that reflect significant observable market information such as reported trades, actual
trade information of similar securities, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes of new issue prices and relevant credit information.
The
carrying value of trade receivables, payables and short-term debt approximate fair value and therefore are not included in the table above.
26
Table of Contents
Note 10. Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
Regulatory assets included on the consolidated balance sheets are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory balancing accounts |
|
$ |
194 |
|
$ |
94 |
|
Energy derivatives |
|
|
143 |
|
|
25 |
|
Other |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory balancing accounts |
|
|
43 |
|
|
43 |
|
Deferred income taxes net |
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
1,561 |
|
Unamortized nuclear investment net |
|
|
310 |
|
|
340 |
|
Nuclear-related ARO investment net |
|
|
248 |
|
|
258 |
|
Unamortized coal plant investment net |
|
|
71 |
|
|
73 |
|
Unamortized loss on reacquired debt |
|
|
277 |
|
|
287 |
|
Pensions and other postretirement benefits |
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
1,014 |
|
Energy derivatives |
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
357 |
|
Environmental remediation |
|
|
39 |
|
|
36 |
|
Other |
|
|
199 |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,058 |
|
|
4,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total regulatory assets |
|
$ |
5,396 |
|
$ |
4,259 |
|
|
|
Regulatory liabilities included on the consolidated balance sheets are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory balancing accounts |
|
$ |
455 |
|
$ |
363 |
|
Other |
|
|
2 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory balancing accounts |
|
|
808 |
|
|
642 |
|
ARO |
|
|
12 |
|
|
171 |
|
Costs of removal |
|
|
2,571 |
|
|
2,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,391 |
|
|
3,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total regulatory liabilities |
|
$ |
3,848 |
|
$ |
3,695 |
|
|
|
27
Table of Contents
Note 11. Other Income and Expenses
Other income and expenses are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Other Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity AFUDC |
|
$ |
25 |
|
$ |
18 |
|
$ |
54 |
|
$ |
35 |
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance policies |
|
|
6 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
13 |
|
Other |
|
|
4 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
$ |
35 |
|
$ |
29 |
|
$ |
70 |
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Civic, political and related activities and donations |
|
$ |
9 |
|
$ |
6 |
|
$ |
15 |
|
$ |
8 |
|
Marketing services |
|
|
2 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
6 |
|
Other |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses |
|
$ |
15 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
26 |
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
Note 12. Variable Interest Entities
Effective January 1, 2010, SCE adopted the FASB's new guidance regarding variable interest entities ("VIEs"). A VIE is defined as a legal entity whose equity owners do not have sufficient
equity at risk, or, as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack any of the following three characteristics: decision-making rights, the obligation to absorb losses, or the right to
receive the expected residual returns of the entity. The new guidance replaces the predominantly quantitative model for determining which reporting entity, if any, has a controlling financial interest
in a VIE with a qualitative approach. Under this new qualitative model, the primary beneficiary is identified as the variable interest holder that has both the power to direct the activities of the
VIE that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the
VIE. The primary beneficiary is required to consolidate the VIE unless specific exceptions or exclusions are met. Commercial and operating activities are generally the factors that most significantly
impact the economic performance of VIEs in which SCE has a variable interest. Commercial and operating activities include construction, operation and maintenance, fuel procurement, dispatch and
compliance with regulatory and contractual requirements.
Variable Interests in VIEs that are not Consolidated
Power Purchase Contracts
SCE has power purchase agreements ("PPAs") in which SCE has a variable interest in 17 VIEs, including 6 tolling agreements, where SCE provides the
natural gas to operate the plants, and 11 contracts with QFs (including the Big 4 projects) that contain variable pricing provisions based on the price of natural gas. SCE has concluded that it is not
the primary beneficiary of these VIEs since it does not control the commercial and operating activities of these entities. In general, because payments
28
Table of Contents
for
capacity are the primary source of income, the most significant economic activity for SCE's VIEs is the operation and maintenance of the power plants. SCE does not have control over the operation
and maintenance of the facilities considered VIEs and it does not bear operational risk of the facilities. See further discussion of the Big 4 projects below.
As
of the balance sheet date, the carrying amount of assets and liabilities in SCE's consolidated balance sheet that relate to its involvement with VIEs result from amounts due under the PPAs or the
fair value of those derivative contracts, which are accounted for at fair value. See Note 9 for a discussion on nonperformance risk. Further, SCE has no residual interest in the entities and
has not provided or guaranteed any debt or equity support, liquidity arrangements, performance guarantees or other commitments associated with these contracts, other than the purchase commitments
described in Note 6. The aggregate capacity dedicated to SCE for these VIE projects was 1,749 MW at June 30, 2010 and the amounts that SCE paid to these projects were $117 million
and $115 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $242 million and $231 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. These amounts are recoverable in customer rates.
The
following table summarizes as of June 30, 2010, SCE's assets and liabilities and exposure to loss associated with SCE's variable interests in the VIEs described above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Short-
Term
|
|
Long-
Term
|
|
Short-
Term
|
|
Long-
Term
|
|
Maximum
Exposure
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Derivatives |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
$ |
964 |
|
$ |
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
$ |
964 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes as of December 31, 2009, SCE's assets and liabilities and exposure to loss associated with SCE's variable interests in the
VIEs described above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Short-
Term
|
|
Long-
Term
|
|
Short-
Term
|
|
Long-
Term
|
|
Maximum
Exposure
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Derivatives |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
$ |
17 |
|
$ |
385 |
|
$ |
43 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
$ |
56 |
|
$ |
385 |
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
|
Realized and unrealized losses are recovered or expected to be recovered from ratepayers in rates, subject to reasonableness, and therefore are not reflected in
earnings.
Big 4 Projects Consolidated Prior to 2010
SCE has variable interests in the Big 4 Projects through power contracts between SCE and the Big 4 Projects containing variable contract pricing
provisions based on the price of natural gas. Prior to 2010, SCE had determined that it was the primary beneficiary of these four VIEs and, therefore, consolidated these projects. SCE prospectively
deconsolidated the Big 4 Projects at January 1, 2010
29
Table of Contents
since
it did not control the commercial and operating activities of these projects. The deconsolidation did not result in a gain or loss.
SCE's
consolidated balance sheet captions impacted by VIE activities prior to 2010 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
(in millions)
|
|
Electric Utility
|
|
VIEs
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
SCE
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
370 |
|
$ |
92 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
462 |
|
Accounts receivable net |
|
|
689 |
|
|
62 |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
719 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
321 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
337 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
94 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
Nonutility property net of accumulated depreciation |
|
|
71 |
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
324 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
318 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
322 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
32,076 |
|
|
430 |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
32,474 |
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
1,031 |
|
$ |
59 |
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
$ |
1,058 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
632 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
637 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
3,181 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,198 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
|
32,076 |
|
|
430 |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
32,474 |
|
|
|
30
Table of Contents
SCE's consolidated statements of income impacted by VIE activities prior to 2010 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2009 |
|
(in millions)
|
|
Electric Utility
|
|
VIEs
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
SCE
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Operating revenue |
|
$ |
2,227 |
|
$ |
131 |
|
$ |
(85 |
) |
$ |
2,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel |
|
|
80 |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
156 |
|
Purchased power |
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
583 |
|
Operation and maintenance |
|
|
737 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
762 |
|
Depreciation, decommissioning and amortization |
|
|
281 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
289 |
|
Property and other taxes |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
1,826 |
|
|
109 |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
1,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
401 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
423 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other income |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
Interest expense net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106 |
) |
Other expenses |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
512 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
534 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
Dividends on preferred and preference stock not subject to mandatory redemption |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available for common stock |
|
$ |
499 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2009 |
|
(in millions)
|
|
Electric Utility
|
|
VIEs
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
SCE
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Operating revenue |
|
$ |
4,356 |
|
$ |
274 |
|
$ |
(168 |
) |
$ |
4,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel |
|
|
179 |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
|
|
356 |
|
Purchased power |
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
1,124 |
|
Operation and maintenance |
|
|
1,374 |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,420 |
|
Depreciation, decommissioning and amortization |
|
|
557 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
574 |
|
Property and other taxes |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
3,528 |
|
|
240 |
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
3,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
828 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
862 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Other income |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
Interest expense net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(215 |
) |
Other expenses |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
732 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
766 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
Dividends on preferred and preference stock not subject to mandatory redemption |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available for common stock |
|
$ |
707 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
707 |
|
|
|
31
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This MD&A contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking
statements reflect SCE's current expectations and projections about future events based on SCE's knowledge of present facts and circumstances and assumptions about future events and include any
statement that does not directly relate to a historical or current fact. Other information distributed by SCE that is incorporated in this report, or that refers to or incorporates this report, may
also contain forward-looking statements. In this report and elsewhere, the words "expects," "believes," "anticipates," "estimates," "projects,"
"intends," "plans," "probable," "may," "will," "could," "would," "should," and variations of such words and similar expressions, or discussions of strategy or of plans, are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. Such statements necessarily involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. Some of the risks, uncertainties
and other important factors that could cause results to differ, or that otherwise could impact SCE or its subsidiaries, include, but are not limited to:
-
- environmental laws and regulations, both at the state and federal levels, or changes in the application of those laws,
that could require additional expenditures or otherwise affect the cost and manner of doing business;
-
- cost of capital and the ability to borrow funds and access to capital markets on reasonable terms;
-
- the cost and availability of electricity including the ability to procure sufficient resources to meet expected customer
needs in the event of significant counterparty defaults under power-purchase agreements;
-
- changes in the fair value of investments and other assets;
-
- ability of SCE to recover its costs in a timely manner from its customers through regulated rates;
-
- decisions and other actions by the CPUC, the FERC and other regulatory authorities and delays in regulatory actions;
-
- changes in interest rates and rates of inflation, including those rates which may be adjusted by public utility
regulators;
-
- governmental, statutory, regulatory or administrative changes or initiatives affecting the electricity industry, including
the market structure rules applicable to each market and price mitigation strategies adopted by Independent System Operators and Regional Transmission Organizations;
-
- risks associated with operating nuclear and other power generating facilities, including operating risks; nuclear fuel
storage issues; failure, availability, efficiency, output, cost of repairs and retrofits in each case of equipment; and availability and cost of spare parts;
-
- availability and creditworthiness of counterparties and the resulting effects on liquidity in the power and fuel markets
and/or the ability of counterparties to pay amounts owed in excess of collateral provided in support of their obligations;
32
Table of Contents
-
- cost and availability of labor, equipment and materials;
-
- the ability to obtain sufficient insurance, including insurance relating to SCE's nuclear facilities and wildfire-related
liability, and to recover the costs of such insurance;
-
- ability to recover uninsured losses in connection with wildfire-related liability;
-
- effects of legal proceedings, changes in or interpretations of tax laws, rates or policies, and changes in accounting
standards;
-
- potential for penalties or disallowances caused by noncompliance with applicable laws and regulations;
-
- outcome of disputes with the IRS and other tax authorities regarding tax positions taken by Edison International;
-
- cost and availability of coal, natural gas, fuel oil, and nuclear fuel, and related transportation to the extent not
recovered through regulated rate cost escalation provisions or balancing accounts;
-
- cost and availability of emission credits or allowances for emission credits;
-
- transmission congestion in and to each market area and the resulting differences in prices between delivery points;
-
- ability to provide sufficient collateral in support of hedging activities and power and fuel purchases;
-
- weather conditions, natural disasters and other unforeseen events;
-
- risks inherent in the development of generation projects and transmission and distribution infrastructure replacement and
expansion projects, including those related to project site identification, financing, construction, permitting, and governmental approvals; and
-
- risks that competing transmission systems will be built by merchant transmission providers in SCE's territory.
Additional
information about risks and uncertainties, including more detail about the factors described above, are discussed throughout this MD&A and in the "Risk Factors" section included in
Part I, Item 1A of the 2009 Form 10-K. Readers are urged to read this entire report, including the information incorporated by reference, and carefully consider the
risks, uncertainties and other factors that affect SCE's business. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and SCE is not obligated to publicly update or revise
forward-looking statements. Readers should review future reports filed by SCE with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
This
MD&A for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 discusses material changes in the consolidated financial condition, results of operations and other developments
of SCE since December 31, 2009, and as compared to the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009. This discussion presumes that the reader has read or has access to
SCE's MD&A for the calendar year 2009 (the "year-ended 2009 MD&A"), which was included in the 2009 Form 10-K.
33
Table of Contents
MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW
Introduction
This overview is presented in four sections:
-
- Highlights of operating results,
-
- SCE capital program,
-
- SCE 2012 General Rate Case, and
-
- Environmental developments.
The
overview is presented as an update to the overview presented in the 2009 Form 10-K. See pages 31 to 34 of the 2009 Form 10-K for additional information
on these topics.
Highlights of Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Change
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Net income available for common stock |
|
$ |
301 |
|
$ |
499 |
|
$ |
(198 |
) |
$ |
465 |
|
$ |
707 |
|
$ |
(242 |
) |
Non-Core Earnings (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Settlement |
|
|
53 |
|
|
300 |
|
|
(247 |
) |
|
53 |
|
|
300 |
|
|
(247 |
) |
|
Tax impact of health care legislation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Core Earnings |
|
$ |
248 |
|
$ |
199 |
|
$ |
49 |
|
$ |
451 |
|
$ |
407 |
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
|
SCE's earnings are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles used in the United States. Management uses core earnings for financial
planning and for analysis of performance. Core earnings are also used when communicating with analysts and investors regarding our earnings results to facilitate comparisons of the Company's
performance from period to period. Core earnings are a non-GAAP financial measure and may not be comparable to those of other companies. Core earnings are defined as earnings attributable
to SCE less income or loss from significant discrete items that management does not consider representative of ongoing earnings, such as: settlement of prior year tax liabilities, change in tax law
and nonrecurring regulatory or legal proceedings.
SCE's
2010 core earnings increased $49 million and $44 million for the quarter and year-to-date, respectively. The quarter increase was due to lower income tax
expense and higher authorized revenue to support rate base growth. These quarter increases were partially offset by higher operating expenses, including the impact of curtailed spending last year due
to the timing of the 2009 CPUC GRC decision. The year-to-date increase was due to higher authorized revenue to support rate base growth, lower income tax expense and higher
capitalized financing costs (AFUDC). These year-to-date increases were partially offset by higher operating expenses, including the impact of curtailed spending last year due
to the timing of the 2009 CPUC GRC decision. The lower tax expense for the quarter and year-to-date includes a change in method of tax accounting for asset removal costs
primarily related to SCE's infrastructure replacement program.
34
Table of Contents
Consolidated
non-core items for SCE included:
-
- An earnings benefit of $53 million recorded in the second quarter of 2010 resulting from acceptance by the
California Franchise Tax Board of the tax positions finalized with the IRS in 2009 as part of the Global Settlement for tax years 1986 through 2002 (described in "Item 8. SCE Notes to
Consolidated Financial StatementsNote 4. Income Taxes" of the 2009 Form 10-K). Edison International is awaiting receipt of final interest calculations from the
California Franchise Tax Board.
-
- A non-cash charge of $39 million recorded in the first quarter of 2010 to reverse previously recognized
federal tax benefits eliminated by the federal health care legislation. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as modified by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, was enacted in
March 2010. The new health care legislation includes a provision that eliminates the federal tax deduction of retiree health care costs to the extent those costs are eligible for federal Medicare
Part D subsidies. Although this change does not take effect until January 1, 2013, SCE is required to recognize the full accounting impact of the legislation in its financial statements
in the period of enactment.
-
- After-tax earnings of $300 million recorded in the second quarter of 2009, which resulted from the
Global Settlement with the IRS.
SCE Capital Program
SCE's capital program continues to be focused primarily in five areas:
-
- Upgrading and constructing new transmission lines to strengthen system reliability and increase access to renewable
energy, including the Tehachapi, Devers-Colorado River and Eldorado-Ivanpah projects.
-
- Maintaining reliability and expanding capability of SCE's transmission and distribution system.
-
- Developing and installing up to 250 MW of utility-owned solar photovoltaic generating facilities (generally ranging in
size from 1 to 2 MW each) on commercial and industrial rooftops and other space in SCE's service territory.
-
- Replacing steam generators at San Onofre intended to enable operations until at least the end of its initial license
period in 2022. During the first quarter of 2010, SCE completed the replacement of the steam generators at San Onofre Unit 2, which was returned to service on April 11, 2010. See "Results of
OperationsElectric Utility Results of OperationsUtility Earning Activities" for discussion of the extended outage at San Onofre Unit 2.
-
- Installing "smart" meters in approximately 5.3 million households and small businesses referred to as
EdisonSmartConnect. During the first six months of 2010, SCE installed approximately 860,000 smart meters, with cumulative installations totaling over 1 million.
SCE
continues to plan to utilize cash generated from its operations and issuance of additional debt and preferred equity for its capital program. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, SCE
issued long-term debt (see "Liquidity and Capital ResourcesHistorical Consolidated Cash FlowCondensed Consolidated Statement of Cash FlowsCash Flows
Provided (Used) by Financing Activities" for further information).
35
Table of Contents
SCE's
capital investments (including accruals) during the six months ended June 30, 2010 totaled $1.5 billion. SCE projects that capital investments will be in the range of
$3.3 billion to $4.0 billion in 2010 and the 2010 2014 total capital investment spending will be in the range of $18 billion to $21.5 billion.
The rate of actual capital spending will be affected by permitting, regulatory, market and other factors as discussed further under "Liquidity and Capital ResourcesCapital Investment
Plans" in the 2009 Form 10-K.
2012 General Rate Case
On July 19, 2010, SCE submitted to the CPUC's Division of Ratepayer Advocates its notice of intent (NOI) to file a 2012 GRC. The NOI
indicates that SCE's GRC application, expected to be filed by year-end 2010, will request a 2012 base rate revenue requirement of $6.3 billion. After considering the effects of
sales growth, SCE's request would be a $903 million increase over projected 2011 base rate revenue. If the CPUC approves the requested rate increase and allocates the increase to ratepayer
groups on a system average percentage change basis, the percentage increases over current base rates and total rates are estimated to be 16.9% and 7.9%, respectively. The requested revenue requirement
increase is driven by the need to maintain system reliability, accommodate customer load growth, and increase operation and maintenance expenses primarily for capital-related projects, information
technology, insurance and pension contributions. The NOI also indicates that SCE's application will propose a post-test year ratemaking mechanism which would result in 2013 and 2014
incremental base revenue requirement increases, net of sales growth, of $305 million and $542 million, respectively, for the same reasons. The current schedule anticipates a final
decision on SCE's 2012 GRC by the end of 2011. SCE cannot predict the revenue requirement the CPUC will ultimately authorize or precisely when a final decision will be adopted.
Environmental Developments
Greenhouse Gas Regulation Developments
In June 2010, the US EPA published its final greenhouse gas tailoring rule, with less stringent statutory emissions thresholds for greenhouse gases
than those originally proposed in late 2009. Since the rule affects only new or modified sources, it is not expected to have any immediate effect, on the existing fossil-fuel generating
stations of SCE.
California Renewable Energy Developments
In June 2010, CARB released a proposed Renewable Electricity Standard regulation, which would require most retail sellers of electricity in
California to procure 33% of their electricity from eligible renewable energy resources by 2020. The California legislature is also contemplating legislation to adopt a 33% renewables portfolio
standard that may supersede the CARB regulation and impose its own program structure. SCE believes that achieving a 33% renewables portfolio standard in this timeframe will be highly ambitious, given
the magnitude of the infrastructure build-out required and the slow pace of transmission permitting and approvals.
Once-Through Cooling
In May 2010, the California State Water Resources Board issued a final policy, which establishes closed-cycle wet cooling as required technology for
retrofitting existing once-through cooled plants like San Onofre and many of the existing fossil-fueled power plants along the California coast. The final policy requires an independent
engineering study to be conducted regarding the feasibility of compliance by California's two coastal nuclear power plants. Depending on the results of the study, the
36
Table of Contents
required
compliance may result in significant capital expenditures at San Onofre and may affect its operations. It may also significantly impact SCE's ability to procure generating capacity from
fossil-fueled plants that use ocean water in once-through cooling systems, system reliability and the cost of electricity to the extent other coastal power plants in California are forced
to shut down or limit operations.
For
further discussion, see "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsNote 6. Commitments and ContingenciesContingenciesEnvironmental Developments."
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SCE's results of operations are derived mainly through two sources:
-
- Utility earning activities, which mainly represent CPUC- and FERC-authorized base rates, which
allow a reasonable return, and CPUC-authorized incentive mechanisms; and
-
- Utility cost-recovery activities, which mainly represent CPUC-authorized balancing accounts, which
allow recovery of costs incurred (including carrying costs) or provide mechanisms to track and recover or refund differences in forecasted and actual amounts. Balancing accounts (except for certain
capital-related projects) do not allow for a return.
Utility
earning activities include base rates that are designed to recover forecasted operation and maintenance costs, certain capital-related carrying costs, interest, taxes and a return, including
the return and taxes on capital projects recovered through balancing account mechanisms. Differences between authorized and actual results impact earnings. Also included in utility earning activities
are revenues or penalties related to incentive mechanisms, other operating revenue, and regulatory charges or disallowances, if any.
Utility
cost-recovery activities include rates which provide for recovery, subject to reasonableness review, of fuel costs, purchased power costs, certain operation and maintenance
expenses (including public purpose related program costs), and depreciation expense related to certain projects. There is no return earned on cost-recovery expenses.
37
Table of Contents
Electric Utility Results of Operations
The following table is a summary of SCE's results of operations for the periods indicated. The presentation below separately identifies utility
earning activities and utility cost-recovery activities.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 versus June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2010
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Utility
Earning
Activities
|
|
Utility
Cost-
Recovery
Activities1,2
|
|
Total
Consolidated
|
|
Utility
Earning
Activities
|
|
Utility
Cost-
Recovery
Activities1,2
|
|
Total
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Operating revenue |
|
$ |
1,308 |
|
$ |
939 |
|
$ |
2,247 |
|
$ |
1, 253 |
|
$ |
1,020 |
|
$ |
2,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel and purchased power |
|
|
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
739 |
|
Operation and maintenance |
|
|
537 |
|
|
218 |
|
|
755 |
|
|
516 |
|
|
246 |
|
|
762 |
|
Depreciation, decommissioning and amortization |
|
|
306 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
320 |
|
|
275 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
289 |
|
Property and other taxes |
|
|
61 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
62 |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
904 |
|
|
939 |
|
|
1,843 |
|
|
852 |
|
|
998 |
|
|
1,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
401 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
423 |
|
Net interest expense and other |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
314 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
336 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
512 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
534 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
22 |
|
Dividends on preferred and preference stock not subject to mandatory redemption |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available for common stock |
|
$ |
301 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
301 |
|
$ |
499 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
499 |
|
|
|
Core Earnings3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
199 |
|
Non-Core Earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
Tax impact of health care legislation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total SCE GAAP Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
499 |
|
|
|
38
Table of Contents
- 1
- Effective
January 1, 2010, SCE deconsolidated the Big 4 projects which affects comparability of cost-recovery activities (see
"SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 12. Variable Interest Entities" for further discussion). Included in the three- and six-months periods ended June 30,
2009, respectively, were the following balances related to the Big 4 projects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2009
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Operating revenue |
|
$ |
131 |
|
$ |
274 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel |
|
|
76 |
|
|
177 |
|
Operation and maintenance |
|
|
25 |
|
|
46 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
8 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
109 |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
22 |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
- 2
- Effective
July 1, 2009, SCE transferred Mountainview Power Company, LLC, to SCE (see "Note 8. Property and Plant" in the
2009 Form 10-K for further discussion). As a result of the transfer and for comparability purposes, Mountainview's 2009 activities ($27 million for both operating revenue and
total expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and $49 million for both operating revenue and total expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2009) were reclassified
from cost-recovery activities to utility earnings activities consistent with the 2010 regulatory recovery mechanism.
- 3
- See
use of Non-GAAP financial measure in "Management OverviewHighlights of Operating Results."
Utility Earning Activities
Utility earning activities were primarily affected by the following:
-
- Higher operating revenue of $55 million primarily due to the following:
-
- $40 million increase related to implementation of the 2009 GRC (effective January 1, 2009) which authorized
a 4.25% increase in 2010 authorized revenue.
-
- $15 million increase related to revenue requirements for capital projects recovered through
CPUC-authorized balancing accounts primarily related to the steam generator replacement project and the EdisonSmartConnectTM project.
-
- $5 million increase related to the 2009 and 2010 FERC rate cases effective March 1, 2009 and March 1,
2010, respectively (see "Liquidity and Capital ResourcesRegulatory Proceedings2010 FERC Rate Case" for further discussion).
-
- Higher operation and maintenance expense of $21 million including the impact of curtailed spending last year due to
the timing of the 2009 GRC decision. The increase in operation and maintenance expense was primarily in the following areas:
-
- $15 million of higher transmission and distribution expenses. In addition to the impact of curtailed spending, the
2010 increase reflects higher costs to support system reliability and infrastructure replacement, increases in preventive maintenance work and training costs.
-
- $10 million of higher expenses related to higher general liability insurance, a nuclear insurance refund received
in 2009, and higher injury and damage claims.
Partially
offset by:
-
- $10 million of lower generation expenses primarily related to a $15 million hydrogen energy project payment
made in the second quarter of 2009, which was subsequently approved for balancing account treatment in December 2009.
39
Table of Contents
-
- Higher depreciation expense of $31 million primarily resulting from increased capital investments including
capitalized software costs.
See
"Income Taxes" below for discussion of lower income taxes during the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.
Utility Cost-Recovery Activities
Excluding the impact of deconsolidation of the Big 4 projects (see "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 12. Variable Interest
Entities"), utility cost-recovery activities were primarily affected by:
-
- Higher purchased power expense of $29 million primarily due to: higher QF purchased power expense of
$120 million primarily due to higher natural gas prices and higher kWh purchases. This was partially offset by lower bilateral energy purchase expense of $30 million primarily due to
decreased kWh purchases. Realized losses on economic hedging activities were $38 million in 2010 and $96 million in 2009. Changes in realized losses on economic hedging activities were
primarily due to settled natural gas prices being lower than contract prices.
-
- Higher fuel expense of $14 million primarily due to higher costs at Mountainview of $15 million resulting
from higher natural gas prices.
40
Table of Contents
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 versus June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2010
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Utility
Earning
Activities
|
|
Utility
Cost-
Recovery
Activities1,2
|
|
Total
Consolidated
|
|
Utility
Earning
Activities
|
|
Utility
Cost-
Recovery
Activities1,2
|
|
Total
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Operating revenue |
|
$ |
2,573 |
|
$ |
1,833 |
|
$ |
4,406 |
|
$ |
2,457 |
|
$ |
2,005 |
|
$ |
4,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel and purchased power |
|
|
|
|
|
1,395 |
|
|
1,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
1,480 |
|
Operation and maintenance |
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
411 |
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
958 |
|
|
462 |
|
|
1,420 |
|
Depreciation, decommissioning and amortization |
|
|
605 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
629 |
|
|
548 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
574 |
|
Property and other taxes |
|
|
129 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
130 |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
1,831 |
|
|
3,622 |
|
|
1,633 |
|
|
1,967 |
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
782 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
784 |
|
|
824 |
|
|
38 |
|
|
862 |
|
Net interest expense and other |
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
(2 |
) |
|
(159 |
) |
|
(169 |
) |
|
(4 |
) |
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
655 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
689 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
732 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
766 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
34 |
|
Dividends on preferred and preference stock not subject to mandatory redemption |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available for common stock |
|
$ |
465 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
465 |
|
$ |
707 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
707 |
|
|
|
Core Earnings3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
407 |
|
Non-Core Earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
Tax impact of health care legislation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total SCE GAAP Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
707 |
|
|
|
- 1
- See
footnote 1 under "Three Month Ended June 30, 2010 versus June 30, 2009" table above.
- 2
- See
footnote 2 under "Three Month Ended June 30, 2010 versus June 30, 2009" table above.
- 3
- See
use of Non-GAAP financial measure in "Management OverviewHighlights of Operating Results."
Utility Earning Activities
Utility earning activities were primarily affected by the following:
-
- Higher operating revenue of $116 million primarily due to the following:
-
- $80 million increase related to implementation of the 2009 GRC (effective January 1, 2009) which authorized
a 4.25% increase in 2010 authorized revenue.
-
- $30 million increase related to the 2009 and 2010 FERC rate cases effective March 1, 2009 and
March 1, 2010, respectively (see "SCE: Liquidity and Capital ResourcesRegulatory Proceedings2010 FERC Rate Case" for further discussion).
41
Table of Contents
-
- $15 million increase related to revenue requirements for capital projects recovered through
CPUC-authorized balancing accounts primarily related to the steam generator replacement project and the EdisonSmartConnectTM project.
-
- Higher operation and maintenance expense of $99 million including the impact of curtailed spending last year due to
the timing of the 2009 GRC decision. The increase in operation and maintenance expense was primarily in the following areas:
-
- $45 million of higher transmission and distribution expenses. In addition to the impact of curtailed spending, the
2010 increase reflects higher costs to support system reliability and infrastructure replacement, increases in preventive maintenance work, line clearing costs and training costs.
-
- $30 million of higher expenses related to higher general liability insurance, a nuclear insurance refund received
in 2009, and higher injury and damage claims.
-
- $5 million of higher 2010 generation expenses reflecting $10 million primarily due to additional work
identified during the San Onofre Unit 2 scheduled outage and $10 million primarily due to overhaul and outage costs at Four Corners. These increases were partially offset by a
$15 million hydrogen energy project payment made in the second quarter of 2009, which was subsequently approved for balancing account treatment in December 2009. During the San Onofre Unit 2
scheduled outage, SCE identified and completed additional work unrelated to the steam generator replacement that resulted in increased operation and maintenance expense and extended the outage beyond
SCE's initial estimated timeframe. San Onofre Unit 2 was returned to service on April 11, 2010.
The
first two of the four replacement steam generators were installed in San Onofre Unit 2 in the first quarter of 2010 and the installation of the final two steam generators at San Onofre Unit 3 is
expected to begin in late 2010. The CPUC has previously adopted a mechanism establishing thresholds for recovery of SCE's incurred costs for the steam generator replacements. Costs above an
established threshold will require a reasonableness review. No cost recovery will be allowed for costs incurred that exceed an authorized cap. The determination of whether a reasonableness review of
costs is necessary will be made after the steam generator replacement project is completed.
As
discussed in the 2009 Form 10-K, SCE is subject to the jurisdiction of the NRC with respect to its San Onofre and Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Stations. San Onofre is currently
addressing a number of regulatory and performance issues, and the NRC has required SCE to take actions to provide greater assurance of compliance by San Onofre personnel with applicable NRC
requirements and procedures. SCE continues to implement plans to address the identified issues. The NRC has continued to affirm that San Onofre has been operated and is being operated safely; however,
a number of these issues remain outstanding, and additional issues have been identified. The cumulative impact of these regulatory and performance issues has been an increase in management focus and
other resources applied at San Onofre. To the extent that these issues persist, the likelihood of further required action, and associated potential for effects on costs and operations, will increase.
-
- Higher depreciation expense of $57 million primarily related to increased capital investments including capitalized
software costs.
42
Table of Contents
-
- Lower net interest expense and other of $12 million primarily related to higher capitalized cost of equity and debt
(AFUDC) resulting from a higher capitalization rate and level of construction in progress. See "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 11. Other Income and Expenses" for further
detail of other income and expenses.
See
"Income Taxes" below for discussion of lower income taxes during the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.
Utility Cost-Recovery Activities
Excluding the impact of deconsolidation of the Big 4 projects (see "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 12. Variable Interest
Entities"), utility cost-recovery activities were primarily affected by:
-
- Higher purchased power expense of $96 million primarily related to: higher QF purchased power expense of
$250 million primarily due to higher natural gas prices and higher kWh purchases; and higher ISO-related energy costs of $75 million, including replacement power costs
related to the San Onofre Unit 2 scheduled outage. This was partially offset by lower bilateral energy purchase expense of $90 million primarily due to decreased kWh purchases. Realized losses
on economic hedging activities were $62 million in 2010 and $194 million in 2009. Changes in realized losses on economic hedging activities were primarily due to settled natural gas
prices being lower than contract prices.
-
- Lower fuel expense of $4 million primarily related to lower costs at Four Corners (coal) of $10 million and
lower costs at San Onofre Unit 2 of $5 million both resulting from the outages described above. These decreases were offset by higher costs at Mountainview of $15 million resulting from
higher natural gas prices.
Supplemental Operating Revenue Information
SCE's total consolidated operating revenue was $2.2 billion and $2.3 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, of which $2.4 billion and $2.3 billion was related to retail billed and unbilled revenue (excluding wholesale sales and balancing account (over)/undercollections) for the
same respective periods. SCE's total consolidated operating revenue was $4.4 billion and $4.5 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, of which
$4.4 billion and $4.2 billion was related to retail billed and unbilled revenue (excluding wholesale sales and balancing account (over)/undercollections) for the same respective periods.
Retail billed and unbilled revenue increased $57 million and $201 million for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to the same
periods in 2009. The quarter and year-to-date increases reflect a rate increase of $126 million and $305 million, respectively, and a sales volume decrease of
$69 million and $104 million, respectively. The rate increase was due to higher system average rates for 2010 compared to the same periods in 2009 mainly due to the implementation of the
CPUC 2009 GRC decision and approved FERC transmission rate changes. The sales volume decrease was due to slightly milder weather experienced during the second quarter of 2010 compared to the same
period in 2009 and economic conditions. As a result of the CPUC-authorized decoupling mechanism, SCE does not bear the volumetric risk related to electricity sales (see "Overview of
Ratemaking Mechanisms" in the 2009 Form 10-K).
Due
to warmer weather during the summer months and SCE's rate design, operating revenue during the third quarter of each year is generally higher than other quarters.
43
Table of Contents
Amounts
SCE bills and collects from its customers for electric power purchased and sold by the CDWR to SCE's customers, CDWR bond-related costs and a portion of direct access exit fees are
remitted to the CDWR and are not recognized as revenue by SCE. The amounts collected and remitted to CDWR were $286 million and $582 million for the three- and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and $391 million and $896 million for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009, respectively. Effective
January 1, 2010, the
CDWR-related rates were decreased primarily to refund CDWR overcollections to customers.
Income Taxes
SCE's income tax expense from continuing operations increased $203 million and $211 million during the three- and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2010, respectively. The 2010 income tax expense reflects: a $39 million non-cash charge recorded in the first quarter related to the federal health
care legislation enacted in March 2010; a $40 million earnings benefit due to a change in method of tax accounting for asset removal costs primarily related to SCE's infrastructure replacement
program; and a $53 million earnings benefit recorded in the second quarter resulting from acceptance by the California Franchise Tax Board of the tax positions finalized with the IRS in 2009 as
part of the Global Settlement for tax years 1986 through 2002. During the second quarter of 2009, SCE recognized a $300 million earnings benefit related to the federal Global Settlement
finalized with the IRS. See "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsNote 4. Income Taxes" for further discussion.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
SCE expects to fund its continuing obligations and projected capital investments for 2010 through cash and equivalents on hand, operating cash flows
and incremental capital market financings of debt and preferred equity. SCE also has availability under its credit facilities if additional funding and liquidity are necessary to meet operating and
capital requirements.
Available Liquidity
As of June 30, 2010, SCE had approximately $91 million of cash and equivalents and short-term investments. As of
June 30, 2010, SCE's long-term debt, including current maturities of long-term debt, was $7.1 billion.
The
following table summarizes the status of SCE's credit facilities at June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Credit
Facilities1
|
|
|
|
Commitment |
|
$ |
2,894 |
|
Outstanding borrowings |
|
|
(215 |
) |
Outstanding letters of credit |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amount available |
|
$ |
2,668 |
|
|
|
- 1
- SCE
has two revolving credit facilities with various banks; a $2.4 billion five-year credit facility that
terminates in February 2013, with four one-year options to extend by mutual consent, and a $500 million three-year credit facility that terminates in March
2013.
Debt Covenant
SCE has a debt covenant in its credit facilities that limits its debt to total capitalization ratio to less than or equal to 0.65 to 1. At
June 30, 2010, SCE's debt to total capitalization ratio was 0.46 to 1.
44
Table of Contents
Regulatory Proceedings
Energy Efficiency Risk/Reward Incentive Mechanism
As discussed in the year-ended 2009 MD&A, the CPUC adopted an Energy Efficiency Risk/Reward Incentive Mechanism applicable to the
2006 - 2008 performance period under which SCE expected to receive a $27 million final payment in late 2010. SCE expects a CPUC decision on the final payment, if any,
in the second half of 2010. There is no assurance that SCE will receive a final payment.
2010 FERC Rate Case
In September 2009, the FERC issued an order allowing SCE to implement its proposed 2010 rates effective March 1, 2010, subject to refund. The
proposed rates would increase SCE's FERC revenue requirement by $107 million, or 24%, over the 2009 FERC revenue requirement primarily due to an increase in transmission rate base, and would
result in an approximate 1% increase to SCE's overall system average rate. SCE has terminated settlement negotiations and begun the litigation process for the proposed 2010 rates. A final decision is
expected in the second half of 2011.
Dividend Restrictions
The CPUC regulates SCE's capital structure and limits the dividends it may pay Edison International. In SCE's most recent cost of capital proceeding,
the CPUC set an authorized capital structure for SCE which included a common equity component of 48%. SCE may make distributions to Edison International as long as the common equity component of SCE's
capital structure remains at or above the 48% authorized level on a 13-month weighted-average basis. At June 30, 2010, SCE's 13-month weighted-average common equity
component of total capitalization was 51% resulting in the capacity to pay $461 million in additional dividends.
SCE
paid dividends of $100 million to its parent, Edison International, in January 2010. Future dividend amounts and timing of distributions are dependent upon several factors, including the
actual level of capital investments, operating cash flows and earnings.
Margin and Collateral Deposits
Certain derivative instruments and power procurement contracts under SCE's power and natural gas hedging activities contain collateral requirements.
The table below illustrates the amount of collateral posted by SCE to its counterparties, as well as the potential collateral that would be required if SCE's credit rating fell below investment grade.
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Collateral posted as of June 30, 20101 |
|
$ |
22 |
|
Incremental collateral requirements resulting from a potential downgrade of SCE's credit rating to below investment grade |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total posted and potential collateral requirements2 |
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
|
- 1
- Collateral
posted consisted of $8 million which was offset against net derivative liabilities and $14 million
provided to counterparties and other brokers (consisting of $4 million in cash reflected in "Margin and collateral deposits" on the consolidated balance sheets and
$10 million in letters of credit).
- 2
- Total
posted and potential collateral requirements may increase by an additional $13 million, based on SCE's forward
position as of June 30, 2010, due to adverse market price movements over the remaining life of the existing contracts using a 95% confidence level.
45
Table of Contents
Historical Consolidated Cash Flow
This section discusses consolidated cash flows from operating, financing and investing activities.
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, |
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
1,095 |
|
$ |
2,054 |
|
Cash flows provided (used) by financing activities |
|
|
465 |
|
|
(1,694 |
) |
Cash flows used by investing activities |
|
|
(1,937 |
) |
|
(1,517 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
(377 |
) |
$ |
(1,157 |
) |
|
|
Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities decreased $959 million in the second quarter of 2010, compared to the second quarter of 2009 primarily
due to the impacts of the Global Settlement, which resulted in a net tax allocation payment received in 2009 from Edison International of $875 million and an increase in deferred tax
liabilities related to the settlement of affirmative claims. The 2010 change was also due to the timing of cash receipts and disbursements related to working capital items and a decrease in
pre-tax income.
Cash Flows Provided (Used) by Financing Activities
Financing activities for the first six months of 2010 were as follows:
-
- Reissued $144 million of tax-exempt pollution control bonds due in 2035. The proceeds from these bonds
were used to repay commercial paper borrowings and for general corporate purposes.
-
- Issued $500 million of first refunding mortgage bonds due in 2040. The bond proceeds were used to repay commercial
paper borrowings and for general corporate purposes.
-
- Issued $215 million of short-term debt to fund interim working capital requirements.
-
- Repaid $250 million of senior unsecured notes.
-
- Paid $100 million in dividends to Edison International.
Financing
activities for the first six months of 2009 were as follows:
-
- Issued $500 million of first refunding mortgage bonds due in 2039 and $250 million of first and refunding
mortgage bonds due in 2014. The bond proceeds were used for general corporate purposes and to finance fuel inventories.
-
- Repaid a net $1.9 billion of short tem debt.
-
- Repaid $150 million of first and refunding mortgage bonds.
46
Table of Contents
-
- Purchased $219 million of two issues of tax-exempt pollution control bonds and converted the issues to
a variable rate structure. As discussed above, SCE reissued $144 million of these bonds during the first six months of 2010. SCE continues to hold the remaining $75 million of these
bonds which are outstanding and have not been retired or cancelled.
-
- Paid $100 million in dividends to Edison International.
Cash Flows Used by Investing Activities
Cash flows from investing activities are driven primarily by capital expenditures and funding of nuclear decommissioning trusts. Cash paid for
capital expenditures was $1.8 billion and $1.4 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, primarily related to transmission and distribution
investments. Net purchases of nuclear decommissioning trust investments and other were $97 million and $105 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Contractual Obligations and Contingencies
Contractual Obligations
For a discussion of issuances of long-term debt, see "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 3. Liabilities and Lines
of CreditLong-Term Debt."
For
a discussion of purchase obligations and capital lease obligations, see "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 6. Commitments and ContingenciesCommitments and
Other Commitments."
Contingencies
Developments related to SCE's FERC Transmission Incentives and CWIP Proceedings, Navajo Nation Litigation and Spent Nuclear Fuel are discussed in
"SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 6. Commitments and ContingenciesContingencies."
Environmental Remediation
As of June 30, 2010, SCE identified 23 sites for remediation and recorded an estimated minimum liability of $38 million. SCE expects to
recover 90% of its remediation costs at certain sites. SCE expects to clean up its identified sites over a period of up to 30 years. Remediation costs in each of the next several years are
expected to range from $3 million to $18 million. See "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 6. Commitments and ContingenciesContingencies" for further
discussion.
MARKET RISK EXPOSURES
For a detailed discussion of SCE's market risk exposures, including commodity price risk, credit risk and interest rate risk, see "SCE: Market Risk
ExposuresCommodity Price Risk" in the year-ended 2009 MD&A.
Interest Rate Risk
At June 30, 2010, the fair market value of SCE's long-term debt (including current portion of long-term debt) was
$8.1 billion, compared to a carrying value of $7.1 billion. At June 30, 2010, SCE
47
Table of Contents
did
not believe that its short-term debt was subject to interest rate risk due to the fair value being approximately equal to the carrying value.
Commodity Price Risk
Natural Gas and Electricity Price Risk
The following table summarizes the fair values of outstanding derivative instruments used at SCE to mitigate its exposure to spot market prices. For
further discussion on fair
value measurements, see "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 9. Fair Value Measurements."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Electricity options, swaps and forward arrangements |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
89 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
25 |
|
Natural gas options, swaps and forward arrangements |
|
|
84 |
|
|
280 |
|
|
86 |
|
|
171 |
|
Congestion revenue rights |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
Tolling arrangements1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,006 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
402 |
|
Netting and collateral |
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
275 |
|
$ |
1,367 |
|
$ |
347 |
|
$ |
$598 |
|
|
|
- 1
- In
compliance with a CPUC mandate, SCE held an open, competitive solicitation that produced agreements with different project developers who
have agreed to construct new southern California generating resources. The contracts provide for fixed capacity payments as well as pricing for energy delivered based on a heat rate and contractual
operation and maintenance prices. However, due to uncertainty regarding the availability of required emission credits, some of the generating resources may not be constructed and the contracts
associated with these resources could therefore terminate, at which time SCE would no longer account for these contracts as derivatives.
48
Table of Contents
The change in the fair value of derivative contracts for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Fair value of derivative contracts, net liability at January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
(251 |
) |
Total realized/unrealized net losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
Included in regulatory assets and liabilities1 |
|
|
(919 |
) |
Purchases and settlements, net |
|
|
70 |
|
Netting and collateral |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of derivative contracts, net liability at June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
(1,092 |
) |
|
|
- 1
- Due
to regulatory mechanisms, SCE's realized and unrealized gains and losses are recorded as regulatory assets and liabilities.
SCE recognizes realized gains and losses on derivative instruments as purchased power expense and recovers these costs, subject to reasonableness, from
ratepayers. As a result, realized gains and losses are not reflected in earnings, but may temporarily affect cash flows. Due to expected future recovery from ratepayers, unrealized gains and losses
are recorded as regulatory assets or liabilities and therefore are not reflected in earnings. Realized losses on economic hedging activities were primarily due to settled natural gas prices being
lower than contract prices. Unrealized losses on economic hedging activities were primarily due to lower forward heat rates (spread between electricity prices and natural gas prices) related to SCE's
long-term contracts from new natural gas-fired generation facilities.
Credit Risk
Credit risk exposure from counterparties for power and gas trading activities is measured as the sum of net accounts receivable (accounts receivable
less accounts payable)
and the current fair value of net derivative assets (derivative assets less derivative liabilities) reflected on the consolidated balance sheets. SCE enters into master agreements which typically
provide for a right of setoff. Accordingly, SCE's credit risk exposure from counterparties is based on a net exposure under these arrangements. As of June 30, 2010, the amount of balance sheet
exposure as described above broken down by the credit ratings of SCE's counterparties, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
(in millions)
|
|
Exposure2
|
|
Collateral
|
|
Net Exposure
|
|
|
|
S&P Credit Rating1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A or higher |
|
$ |
217 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
A- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBB+ |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
BBB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBB- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below investment grade and not rated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
218 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
|
- 1
- SCE
assigns a credit rating based on the lower of a counterparty's S&P or Moody's rating. For ease of reference, the above table
uses the S&P classifications to summarize risk, but reflects the lower of the two credit ratings.
- 2
- Exposure
excludes amounts related to contracts classified as normal purchase and sales and non-derivative contractual
commitments that are not recorded on the consolidated balance sheets, except for any related net accounts receivable.
49
Table of Contents
The credit risk exposure set forth in the above table is comprised of less than $1 million of net account receivables and $218 million
representing the fair value, adjusted for counterparty credit reserves, of derivative contracts.
The
CAISO comprises 87% of the total net exposure above and is mainly related to the CRRs' fair value (see "Commodity Price Risk" for further information).
NEW ACCOUNTING GUIDANCE
New accounting guidance is discussed in "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting
PoliciesNew Accounting Guidance."
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Information responding to this item is included in the MD&A under the heading "Market Risk Exposures" and is incorporated herein by this reference.
ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
SCE's management, under the supervision and with the participation of the company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has
evaluated the effectiveness of SCE's disclosure controls and procedures (as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of
the end of the period, SCE's disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in SCE's internal control over financial reporting (as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or
15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, SCE's internal control over
financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Navajo Nation Litigation
Developments related to the Navajo Nation litigation are discussed in "SCE Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 6. Commitments and
ContingenciesContingenciesNavajo Nation Litigation."
50
Table of Contents
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Edison International Director Matching Gifts Program, as adopted June 24, 2010 (File No. 1-9936, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Edison International's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2010)* |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act |
|
32 |
|
Statement Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
101 |
|
Financial statements from the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Southern California Edison Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, filed on August 5, 2010, formatted in XBRL: (i) the
Consolidated Statements of Income; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements. |
- *
- Incorporated
by reference pursuant to Rule 12b-32.
51
Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY |
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
By |
|
/s/ CHRIS C. DOMINSKI
Chris C. Dominski
Vice President and Controller
(Duly Authorized Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer) |
Date:
August 5, 2010
52