SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC. - Quarter Report: 2008 December (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
[x]
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
quarterly period ended December 31,
2008
OR
[
]
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the transition period from ________________ to
_________________
|
Commission
file number 0-23406
Southern
Missouri Bancorp, Inc.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Missouri
|
43-1665523
|
|
State
or jurisdiction of incorporation)
|
(IRS
employer id. no.)
|
531 Vine
Street Poplar Bluff,
MO 63901
(Address
of principal executive
offices) (Zip
code)
(573)
778-1800
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes __X__ No _____
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell corporation (as defined in Rule
12 b-2 of the Exchange Act)
Yes _____ No
__X__
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated
filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check
one):
Large
accelerated filer _____
Accelerated filer _____ Non-accelerated
filer _____ Smaller
reporting company __X__
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date:
Class
|
Outstanding at February 12,
2009
|
|
Common
Stock, Par Value $.01
|
2,087,976
Shares
|
SOUTHERN
MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
FORM
10-Q
INDEX
PART
I.
|
Financial
Information
|
PAGE
NO.
|
Item
1.
|
Consolidated
Financial Statements
|
|
- Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
3
|
|
- Consolidated
Statements of Income and
|
4
|
|
Comprehensive
Income
|
||
- Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
5
|
|
- Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
6
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
12
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
22
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
24
|
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
25
|
Item
1a.
|
Risk
Factors
|
25
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
26
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
upon Senior Securities
|
26
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
26
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
26
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
26
|
- Signature
Page
|
27
|
|
- Certifications
|
30
|
|
PART I: Item
1: Consolidated Financial Statements
SOUTHERN
MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER
31, 2008 AND JUNE 30, 2008
December 31, 2008
|
June 30, 2008
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 13,350,714 | $ | 6,042,408 | ||||
Interest-bearing
time deposits
|
- | 1,980,000 | ||||||
Available
for sale securities
|
58,326,261 | 39,915,280 | ||||||
Stock
in FHLB of Des Moines
|
4,592,300 | 3,323,700 | ||||||
Loans
receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of
$3,900,658
and $3,567,203 at December 31, 2008,
and
June 30, 2008, respectively
|
||||||||
351,251,710 | 343,069,775 | |||||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
3,762,631 | 3,011,777 | ||||||
Premises
and equipment, net
|
8,236,245 | 8,204,631 | ||||||
Bank
owned life insurance – cash surrender value
|
7,429,228 | 7,289,819 | ||||||
Intangible
assets, net
|
1,710,274 | 1,837,903 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
4,597,581 | 3,145,090 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 453,256,944 | $ | 417,820,383 | ||||
Deposits
|
$ | 286,046,792 | $ | 292,257,045 | ||||
Securities
sold under agreements to repurchase
|
25,517,751 | 21,803,513 | ||||||
Advances
from FHLB of Des Moines
|
92,675,000 | 64,050,000 | ||||||
Accounts
payable and other liabilities
|
688,318 | 821,407 | ||||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
851,706 | 1,199,769 | ||||||
Subordinated
debt
|
7,217,000 | 7,217,000 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
412,996,567 | 387,348,734 | ||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
- | - | ||||||
Preferred
stock, $.01 par value, $1,000 liquidation value;
500,000
shares authorized; 9,550 shares issued and outstanding
|
9,373,210 | - | ||||||
Common
stock, $.01 par value; 4,000,000 shares authorized;
2,957,226
shares issued
|
29,572 | 29,572 | ||||||
Warrants
to acquire common stock
|
176,790 | - | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
16,355,500 | 16,675,839 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
28,655,624 | 27,364,219 | ||||||
Treasury
stock of 869,250 shares at December 31, 2008 and
766,393
shares at June 30, 2008, at cost
|
(13,994,800 | ) | (13,002,803 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss - AFS securities
|
(367,014 | ) | (626,673 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income - FAS 158
|
31,495 | 31,495 | ||||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
40,260,377 | 30,471,649 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 453,256,944 | $ | 417,820,383 |
See Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
SOUTHERN
MISSOURI BANCORP, INC
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR
THE THREE- AND SIX-MONTH PERIODS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
(Unaudited)
Three
months ended
|
Six
months ended
|
|||||||||||||||
December
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||
INTEREST
INCOME:
|
||||||||||||||||
Loans
|
$ | 5,734,137 | $ | 5,919,541 | $ | 11,523,631 | $ | 11,830,850 | ||||||||
Investment
securities
|
159,671 | 289,080 | 336,480 | 578,567 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
399,776 | 156,160 | 754,200 | 281,226 | ||||||||||||
Other
interest-earning assets
|
10,332 | 12,460 | 32,080 | 19,228 | ||||||||||||
Total
interest income
|
6,303,916 | 6,377,241 | 12,646,391 | 12,709,871 | ||||||||||||
INTEREST
EXPENSE:
|
||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
1,808,640 | 2,476,505 | 3,642,271 | 5,002,636 | ||||||||||||
Securities
sold under agreements to repurchase
|
52,526 | 207,435 | 142,015 | 399,986 | ||||||||||||
Advances
from FHLB of Des Moines
|
884,732 | 768,463 | 1,746,942 | 1,600,462 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated
debt
|
99,819 | 153,627 | 203,478 | 304,142 | ||||||||||||
Total
interest expense
|
2,845,717 | 3,606,030 | 5,734,706 | 7,307,226 | ||||||||||||
NET
INTEREST INCOME
|
3,458,199 | 2,771,211 | 6,911,685 | 5,402,645 | ||||||||||||
PROVISION
FOR LOAN LOSSES
|
200,000 | 90,000 | 600,000 | 200,000 | ||||||||||||
NET
INTEREST INCOME AFTER
|
||||||||||||||||
PROVISION
FOR LOAN LOSSES
|
3,258,199 | 2,681,211 | 6,311,685 | 5,202,645 | ||||||||||||
NONINTEREST
INCOME:
|
||||||||||||||||
Customer
service charges
|
305,252 | 318,479 | 656,345 | 622,070 | ||||||||||||
Loan
late charges
|
39,530 | 32,471 | 75,122 | 65,895 | ||||||||||||
Increase
in cash surrender value of bank
owned
life insurance
|
67,775 | 69,181 | 139,409 | 137,732 | ||||||||||||
Net
realized gains on sale of AFS
securities
|
- | 6,084 | - | 6,084 | ||||||||||||
AFS
securities losses due to other-than-
temporary-impairment
|
(375,000 | ) | - | (678,973 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Other
|
202,774 | 175,822 | 384,082 | 357,815 | ||||||||||||
Total
noninterest income
|
240,331 | 602,037 | 575,985 | 1,189,596 | ||||||||||||
NONINTEREST
EXPENSE:
|
||||||||||||||||
Compensation
and benefits
|
1,188,324 | 1,083,434 | 2,372,901 | 2,148,840 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy
and equipment, net
|
391,469 | 378,058 | 746,476 | 751,026 | ||||||||||||
DIF
deposit insurance premium
|
79,228 | 7,790 | 90,762 | 15,016 | ||||||||||||
Professional
fees
|
67,103 | 90,119 | 111,968 | 129,410 | ||||||||||||
Advertising
|
70,532 | 52,159 | 103,454 | 99,382 | ||||||||||||
Postage
and office supplies
|
66,280 | 65,176 | 144,053 | 137,188 | ||||||||||||
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
63,814 | 63,814 | 127,629 | 127,628 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
279,585 | 237,392 | 546,465 | 465,779 | ||||||||||||
Total
noninterest expense
|
2,206,335 | 1,977,942 | 4,243,708 | 3,874,269 | ||||||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
1,292,195 | 1,305,306 | 2,643,962 | 2,517,972 | ||||||||||||
INCOME
TAXES
|
404,500 | 432,441 | 829,500 | 831,921 | ||||||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
887,695 | 872,865 | 1,814,462 | 1,686,051 | ||||||||||||
OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME, NET OF TAX:
|
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
gains on AFS securities,
net
of income taxes
|
1,068 | 260,727 | 259,659 | 428,830 | ||||||||||||
Adjustment
for gains included in net income
|
- | (6,084 | ) | - | (6,084 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
other comprehensive income
|
1,068 | 254,643 | 259,659 | 422,746 | ||||||||||||
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
|
$ | 888,763 | $ | 1,127,508 | $ | 2,074,121 | $ | 2,108,797 | ||||||||
Basic
earnings per common share
|
$ | 0.40 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.82 | $ | 0.77 | ||||||||
Diluted
earnings per common share
|
$ | 0.40 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.82 | $ | 0.76 | ||||||||
Dividends
per common share
|
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.20 |
See Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
SOUTHERN
MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR
THE SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
(Unaudited)
Six
months ended
|
||||||||
December
31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities:
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 1,814,462 | $ | 1,686,051 | ||||
Items
not requiring (providing) cash:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
|
301,540 | 335,722 | ||||||
MRP
and SOP expense
|
34,419 | 36,803 | ||||||
AFS
losses due to other-than-temporary impairment
|
678,973 | - | ||||||
Net
realized gains on sale of AFS securities
|
- | (6,084 | ) | |||||
Gain
on sale of foreclosed assets
|
(13,474 | ) | (20,203 | ) | ||||
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
127,629 | 127,629 | ||||||
Increase
in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance
|
(139,409 | ) | (137,732 | ) | ||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
600,000 | 200,000 | ||||||
Net
amortization (accretion) of premiums and discounts on
securities
|
33,470 | (8,075 | ) | |||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(136,000 | ) | (39,000 | ) | ||||
Changes
in:
|
||||||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
(780,554 | ) | (507,206 | ) | ||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
56,796 | 17,451 | ||||||
Accounts
payable and other liabilities
|
(133,089 | ) | 22,695 | |||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
(348,063 | ) | 51,852 | |||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
2,096,700 | 1,759,903 | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Net
increase in loans
|
(9,151,576 | ) | (8,152,812 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sales of available for sale securities
|
- | 233,500 | ||||||
Proceeds
from maturities of available for sale securities
|
3,610,558 | 9,454,374 | ||||||
Net
(purchases) redemptions of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
(1,268,600 | ) | 12,200 | |||||
Purchases
of available-for-sale securities
|
(22,321,825 | ) | (12,253,467 | ) | ||||
Purchases
of premises and equipment
|
(333,154 | ) | (107,285 | ) | ||||
Investments
in state & federal tax credits
|
(1,263,944 | ) | - | |||||
Proceeds
from sale of foreclosed assets
|
150,974 | 369,472 | ||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(30,577,567 | ) | (10,444,018 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock issued
|
9,550,000 | - | ||||||
Net
decrease in demand deposits and savings accounts
|
(2,599,980 | ) | (5,316,531 | ) | ||||
Net
(decrease) increase in certificates of deposits
|
(3,610,273 | ) | 9,374,930 | |||||
Net
increase in securities sold under agreements to repuchase
|
3,714,238 | 5,049,140 | ||||||
Proceeds
from Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
161,475,000 | 304,500,000 | ||||||
Repayments
of Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
(132,850,000 | ) | (302,000,000 | ) | ||||
Dividends
paid on common stock
|
(523,057 | ) | (439,908 | ) | ||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
161,000 | - | ||||||
Purchases
of treasury stock
|
(1,507,755 | ) | (695,300 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
33,809,173 | 10,472,331 | ||||||
Increase
in cash and cash equivalents
|
5,328,306 | 1,788,216 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
8,022,408 | 7,330,966 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 13,350,714 | $ | 9,119,182 | ||||
Supplemental
disclosures of
|
||||||||
Cash
flow information:
|
||||||||
Noncash investing and financing
activities:
|
||||||||
Conversion
of loans to foreclosed real estate
|
$ | 268,000 | $ | 303,369 | ||||
Conversion
of loans to other equipment
|
131,341 | 40,750 | ||||||
Cash paid during the period
for:
|
||||||||
Interest
(net of interest credited)
|
$ | 1,894,700 | $ | 2,831,530 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
981,405 | 915,683 |
See Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
SOUTHERN
MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Note
1: Basis of
Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim
financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Regulation S-X. Accordingly,
they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management, all material
adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary
for a fair presentation have been included. The consolidated balance
sheet of the Company as of June 30, 2008, has been derived from the audited
consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of that date. Operating
results for the three- and six-month periods ended December 31, 2008, are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal
year. For additional information, refer to the Company’s June 30,
2008, Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC and the Company’s annual report,
which contains the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal
years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Southern Missouri Bank & Trust Co.
(SMBT or Bank). All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Note
2: Fair
Value Measurements
Effective
July 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 has been applied
prospectively as of the beginning of the year/period.
SFAS No.
157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 also establishes a
fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair
value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used
to measure fair value:
Level 1
|
Quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities
|
Level 2
|
Observable
inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets
or liabilities; quoted prices in active markets that are not active; or
other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable
market data for substantially the full term of the assets or
liabilities
|
Level 3
|
Unobservable
inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are
significant to the fair value of the assets or
liabilities
|
Following
is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at
fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance
sheet, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the
valuation hierarchy.
Available-for-sale
Securities
Available-for-sale
securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Available-for-sale
securities is the only balance sheet category our Company is required, in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (US GAAP), to carry at fair value on a recurring basis. Securities
classified as available for sale are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2
and 3 inputs. Level 2 securities include U.S. government and federal agency
obligations, obligations of states and political subdivisions, FHLMC preferred
stock, and mortgage-backed securities. Level 3 securities include
pooled trust preferred securities. For Level 2 securities, our
Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The
fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes,
market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels,
trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and
the bond’s terms and conditions, among other things. For level 3
securities, the Company used discounted cash flow valuations to assign an
estimated market value to the security.
6
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2008,
Using:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fair
Value at September 30,
2008
|
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant
Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|||||||||||||
Available-for-sale
securities
|
$ | 58,326,261 | $ | - | $ | 57,844,102 | $ | 482,159 |
The
following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of recurring
fair value measurements recognized in the accompanying balance sheet using
significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs:
Available-for-sale
Securities
|
||||
Balance,
July 1, 2008
|
$ | - | ||
Total
realized and unrealized gains and losses
|
||||
Included
in net income
|
(375,000 | ) | ||
Included
in other comprehensive income
|
(1,041,990 | ) | ||
Purchases,
issuances, and settlements
|
- | |||
Transfers
in and/or out of Level 3
|
1,899,149 | |||
Balance,
December 31, 2008
|
$ | 482,159 | ||
Total
gains or losses for the period included in net income attributable to the
change in
unrealized
gains or losses related to assets and liabilities still held at the
reporting date
|
$ | 375,000 |
Realized
and unrealized gains and losses included in net income related to Level 3
securities for the period from July 1, 2008, through December 31, 2008, are
reported in the consolidated statements of operations as follows:
Noninterest
Income
|
||||
AFS
securities losses due to other-than-temporary-impairment
|
$ | (375,000 | ) |
Note
3: Securities
Available
for sale securities are summarized as follows at estimated fair
value:
December 31, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
Gross
|
Gross
|
Estimated
|
||||||||||||||
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
|||||||||||||
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Value
|
|||||||||||||
Investment
Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S.
government and federal agency obligation
|
$ | 3,993,892 | $ | 107,382 | $ | - | $ | 4,101,274 | ||||||||
Obligations
of state and political subdivisions
|
10,712,798 | 2,110 | (269,488 | ) | 10,445,420 | |||||||||||
Other
securities
|
1,517,234 | - | (1,029,475 | ) | 487,759 | |||||||||||
FHLMC
preferred stock
|
- | 1,215 | - | 1,215 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
42,684,929 | 641,049 | (35,385 | ) | 43,290,593 | |||||||||||
Total
investments and mortgage-backed securities
|
$ | 58,908,853 | $ | 751,756 | $ | (1,334,348 | ) | $ | 58,326,261 |
June 30, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
Gross
|
Gross
|
Estimated
|
||||||||||||||
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
|||||||||||||
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Value
|
|||||||||||||
Investment
Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S.
government and federal agency obligation
|
$ | 3,992,999 | $ | 52,103 | $ | (25,660 | ) | $ | 4,019,442 | |||||||
Obligations
of state and political subdivisions
|
6,299,763 | 7,195 | (276,075 | ) | 6,030,883 | |||||||||||
Other
securities
|
1,889,424 | - | (325,979 | ) | 1,563,445 | |||||||||||
FHLMC
preferred stock
|
304,125 | - | (8,925 | ) | 295,200 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
28,423,717 | 63,754 | (481,161 | ) | 28,006,310 | |||||||||||
Total
investments and mortgage-backed securities
|
$ | 40,910,028 | $ | 123,052 | $ | (1,117,800 | ) | $ | 39,915,280 |
7
The
following table shows our investments’ gross unrealized losses and fair value,
aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities
have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31,
2008.
Less than 12 months
|
More than 12 months
|
Totals
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated
|
Unrealized
|
Estimated
|
Unrealized
|
Estimated
|
Unrealized
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value
|
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
Losses
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Investment
Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S.
government and
federal
agency obligations
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||||
Obligations
of state and
political
subdivisions
|
5,509,124 | (218,113 | ) | 448,625 | (51,375 | ) | 5,957,749 | (269,488 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Obligations
of state and
political
subdivisions
|
5,509,124 | (218,113 | ) | 448,625 | (51,375 | ) | 5,957,749 | (269,488 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other
securities
|
209,165 | (701,245 | ) | 272,994 | (328,230 | ) | 482,159 | (1,029,475 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
82,581 | (1,988 | ) | 1,291,135 | (33,397 | ) | 1,373,716 | (35,385 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total
investments and
mortgage-backed
securities
|
$ | 5,800,870 | $ | (921,346 | ) | $ | 2,012,754 | $ | (413,002 | ) | $ | 7,813,624 | $ | (1,334,348 | ) | |||||||||
The
following table shows our investments’ gross unrealized losses and fair value,
aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities
have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30,
2008.
Less than 12 months
|
More than 12 months
|
Totals
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated
|
Unrealized
|
Estimated
|
Unrealized
|
Estimated
|
Unrealized
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value
|
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
Losses
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Investment
Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S.
government and
federal
agency obligations
|
$ | 1,971,482 | $ | (25,660 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,971,482 | $ | (25,660 | ) | ||||||||||
Obligations
of state and
political
subdivisions
|
5,117,601 | (276,075 | ) | - | - | 5,117,601 | (276,075 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Obligations
of state and
political
subdivisions
|
5,117,601 | (276,075 | ) | - | - | 5,117,601 | (276,075 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other
securities
|
1,858,645 | (334,904 | ) | - | - | 1,858,645 | (334,904 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
21,382,034 | (449,610 | ) | 1,407,530 | (31,551 | ) | 22,789,564 | (481,161 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total
investments and
mortgage-backed
securities
|
$ | 30,329,762 | $ | (1,086,249 | ) | $ | 1,407,530 | $ | (31,551 | ) | $ | 31,737,292 | $ | (1,117,800 | ) | |||||||||
Note
4: Loans
Loans are
summarized as follows:
December
31,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2008
|
|||||||
Real
Estate Loans:
|
||||||||
Conventional
|
$ | 150,989,525 | $ | 149,340,248 | ||||
Construction
|
14,454,575 | 13,945,027 | ||||||
Commercial
|
89,547,412 | 85,859,482 | ||||||
Consumer
loans
|
21,798,680 | 21,524,166 | ||||||
Commercial
loans
|
84,067,383 | 81,574,995 | ||||||
361,857,575 | 352,243,918 | |||||||
Loans
in process
|
(5,783,154 | ) | (5,667,898 | ) | ||||
Deferred
loan fees, net
|
77,947 | 60,958 | ||||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
(3,900,658 | ) | (3,567,203 | ) | ||||
Total
loans
|
$ | 351,251,710 | $ | 343,069,775 |
Note
5: Deposits
Deposits
are summarized as follows:
December
31,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2008
|
|||||||
Non-interest
bearing accounts
|
$ | 22,805,057 | $ | 19,220,977 | ||||
NOW
accounts
|
46,934,213 | 37,150,005 | ||||||
Money
market deposit accounts
|
5,966,250 | 12,104,527 | ||||||
Savings
accounts
|
63,593,203 | 73,423,195 | ||||||
Certificates
|
146,748,069 | 150,358,341 | ||||||
Total
deposits
|
$ | 286,046,792 | $ | 292,257,045 |
8
Note
6: Earnings
Per Share
Basic and
diluted earnings per share are based upon the weighted-average shares
outstanding. The following table summarizes basic and diluted
earnings per common share for the three- and six-month periods ended December
31, 2008 and 2007.
Three
months ended
|
Six
months ended
|
|||||||||||||||
December
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 887,695 | $ | 872,865 | $ | 1,814,462 | $ | 1,686,051 | ||||||||
Dividend
payable on preferred stock
|
34,486 | - | 34,486 | - | ||||||||||||
Net
income available to common shareholders
|
$ | 853,209 | $ | 872,865 | $ | 1,779,976 | $ | 1,686,051 | ||||||||
Average
Common shares – outstanding basic
|
2,129,827 | 2,170,191 | 2,163,534 | 2,184,623 | ||||||||||||
Stock
options under treasury stock method
|
681 | 40,394 | 197 | 40,574 | ||||||||||||
Average
Common share – outstanding diluted
|
2,130,508 | 2,210,585 | 2,163,731 | 2,225,197 | ||||||||||||
Basic
earnings per common share
|
$ | 0.40 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.82 | $ | 0.77 | ||||||||
Diluted
earnings per common share
|
$ | 0.40 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.82 | $ | 0.76 |
The
Company had 189,826 and 65,500 stock options and warrants outstanding at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, with a grant price exceeding the
market price. These stock options and warrants were excluded from the
above calculation as they were anti-dilutive.
Note
7: Stock
Option Plans
Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based
Payment,” requires that compensation costs related to share-based payment
transactions be recognized in financial statements. With limited
exceptions, the amount of compensation cost is measured based on the grant-date
fair value of the equity instruments issued. Compensation cost is
recognized over the vesting period during which an employee provides service in
exchange for the award.
Note
8: Employee
Stock Ownership Plan
The
Company established a tax-qualified ESOP in April 1994. The plan covers
substantially all employees who have attained the age of 21 and completed one
year of service. The Company’s intent is to continue the ESOP for
fiscal 2009. The Company has been accruing $53,000 per quarter for
ESOP benefit expenses during this fiscal year and has contributed cash to the
plan to allow the purchase of shares for allocation to
participants.
Note
9: Corporate Obligated Floating
Rate Trust Preferred Securities
Southern
Missouri Statutory Trust I issued $7.0 million of Floating Rate Capital
Securities (the “Trust Preferred Securities”) in March, 2004, with a liquidation
value of $1,000 per share. The securities are due in 30 years,
redeemable after five years and bear interest at a floating rate based on
LIBOR. The securities represent undivided beneficial interests in the
trust, which was established by the Company for the purpose of issuing the
securities. The Trust Preferred Securities were sold in a private
transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the “Act”) and have not been registered under the Act. The
securities may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration
or an applicable exemption from registration requirements.
Southern
Missouri Statutory Trust I used the proceeds from the sale of the Trust
Preferred Securities to purchase Junior Subordinated Debentures of the
Company. The Company has used its net proceeds for working capital
and investment in its subsidiary.
Note 10:
Capital Purchase
Program Implemented by the U.S. Treasury
In
December 2008, the Company received $9.6 million from the U.S. Treasury through
the sale of 9,550 shares of the Company’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual
Preferred Stock, Series A, as part of the Treasury’s Capital Purchase
Program. The Company also issued to the U.S. Treasury a warrant to
purchase 114,326 shares of common stock at $12.53 per share. The
amount of preferred shares sold represented approximately 3% of the Company’s
risk-weighted assets as of September 30, 2008.
The
transaction was part of the Treasury’s program to infuse capital into the
nation’s healthiest and strongest banks for the purpose of stabilizing the US
financial system and promoting economic activity. The Company elected
to participate in the program given the uncertain economic outlook, the
relatively attractive cost of capital compared to the current market, and the
9
strategic
opportunities the Company foresees regarding potential uses of the
capital. The additional capital increased the Company’s already
well-capitalized position. The Company used the proceeds of the issue
for working capital and investment in its banking subsidiary.
The
preferred shares pay a cumulative dividend of 5% per year for the first five
years and 9% per year thereafter. The preferred shares are callable
after three years at 100% of the issue price, subject to the approval of the
Company’s federal regulator. Earlier redemptions of the preferred
shares also require that the Company complete an offering of at least
$2,387,500.
Note
11: Authorized Share Repurchase
Program
On
October 22, 2008, the Board of Directors authorized and the Company announced
the open-market or privately-negotiated stock repurchase of up to 110,000 shares
of the Company’s outstanding stock. The repurchase program was
completed November 19, 2008. As of December 31, 2008, the number of
shares held as treasury stock was 869,250. Outside of purchases
necessary for funding of benefit plans, the Company does not expect repurchase
activity in the near term, due to its participation in the US Treasury
Department’s Capital Purchase Program, which generally precludes repurchase
activity.
Note
12: Current
Economic Conditions
The
current economic environment presents financial institutions with unprecedented
circumstances and challenges which, in some cases, have resulted in large
declines in the fair values of investments and other assets, constraints on
liquidity and significant credit quality problems, including severe volatility
in the valuation of real estate and other collateral supporting
loans. The financial statements have been prepared using values and
information currently available to the Company.
Given the
volatility of current economic conditions, the values of assets and liabilities
recorded in the financial statements could change rapidly, resulting in material
future adjustments in fair values, the allowance for loan losses, and capital
that could negatively impact the Company’s ability to meet regulatory capital
requirements and maintain sufficient liquidity.
Note
13: New
Accounting Pronouncements
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting standards,
and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 was
effective for the Company for the fiscal year which began July 1, 2008. In March
2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 157-2 (“FSP No. 157-2”), which
delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and
liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in
the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), to fiscal
years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. Adoption of
SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial
results.
In
September 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue 06-4, “Accounting
for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement
Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements,” was ratified. This EITF Issue
addresses accounting for separate agreements which split life insurance policy
benefits between an employer and employee. The Issue requires the employer to
recognize a liability for future benefits payable to the employee under these
agreements. The effects of applying this Issue must be recognized through either
a change in accounting principle through an adjustment to equity or through the
retrospective application to all prior periods. The Issue was effective for the
fiscal year which began July 1, 2008, and did not have a material impact on the
Company’s financial results.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115” (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 provides
companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at
estimated fair value. Most of the provisions of SFAS No. 159 are elective;
however, the amendment to SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments
in Debt and Equity Securities, applies to all entities that own trading and
available-for-sale securities. The fair value option created by SFAS
No. 159 permits an entity to measure eligible items at fair value as of
specified election dates. The fair value option (a) may generally be
applied instrument by instrument, (b) is irrevocable unless a new election
date occurs, and (c) must be applied to the entire instrument and not to
only a portion of the instrument. SFAS No. 159 was effective for the
Company for the fiscal year which began July 1, 2008, and did not have a
material effect on the Company’s financial results.
In
October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-3, “Determining the Fair
Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active” (“FSP
157-3”). FSB 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157, “Fair
Value Measurements,” in a market that is not active and provides an example to
illustrate key considerations in determining fair value of financial assets when
the market for that financial asset is not active. FSP 157-3
applies to financial assets within the scope of accounting pronouncements that
require or permit fair value measurements in accordance with FAS
157. FSP 157-3 was
10
effective
upon issuance and included prior periods for which financial statements had not
been issued. The application of FSP 157-3 was used to help determine
the OTTI of some Company securities.
In
January 2009, the FASB issued staff position (FSP) EITF 99-20-1. This
FSP amends the impairment guidance in EITF Issue No. 99-20, “Recognition of
Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial
Interests that Continue to be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial
Assets,” to achieve more consistent determination of whether an
other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. The FSP also retains
and emphasizes the objective of an other-than-temporary impairment assessment
and the related disclosure requirements in FASB Statement No. 115, “Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” The FSP is
effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15,
2008. The application of this FSP was used to help determine the OTTI
of some Company securities.
Note
13: New
Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Effective
In
December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business
Combinations—A Replacement of FASB Statement No. 141” (“SFAS No. 141(R)”)
and Statement No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements—An Amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No. 141(R)
establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and
measures certain items in a business combination, as well as disclosures about
the nature and financial effects of a business combination. SFAS No. 160
establishes accounting and reporting standards surrounding noncontrolling
interest, or minority interests, which are the portions of equity in a
subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. The
pronouncements are effective for fiscal years beginning on or after
December 15, 2008 and apply prospectively to business combinations, meaning
they are effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2009. Presentation and
disclosure requirements related to noncontrolling interests must be
retrospectively applied. Management is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS
No. 141(R) on its accounting for future acquisitions; management has evaluated
the requirements of SFAS No. 160 and believes it will not have a material effect
on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
In March
2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities—An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”
(“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced qualitative disclosures about
objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about
fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and
disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative
agreements. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, meaning it is
effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2009. The Company does
not expect adoption of the Statement to have a significant effect on its
financial condition or results of operations.
11
PART I: Item
2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
SOUTHERN
MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
General
Southern
Missouri Bancorp, Inc. (Southern Missouri or Company) is a Missouri corporation
and owns all of the outstanding stock of Southern Missouri Bank & Trust Co.
(SMBT or the Bank). The Company’s earnings are primarily dependent on
the operations of the Bank. As a result, the following discussion
relates primarily to the operations of the Bank. The Bank’s deposit
accounts are generally insured up to a maximum of $100,000 (certain retirement
accounts are insured up to $250,000; and all accounts are currently temporarily
insured up to $250,000) by the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF), which is
administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The
Bank currently conducts its business through its home office located in Poplar
Bluff and nine full service branch facilities in Poplar Bluff (2), Van Buren,
Dexter, Kennett, Doniphan, Sikeston, Matthews, and Qulin, Missouri.
The
significant accounting policies followed by Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. and
its wholly-owned subsidiary for interim financial reporting are consistent with
the accounting policies followed for annual financial reporting. All
adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature and are in the opinion of
management necessary for a fair statement of the results for the periods
reported, have been included in the accompanying consolidated condensed
financial statements.
The
consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of June 30, 2008, has been derived
from the audited consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of that
date. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in
the Company’s annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been
condensed or omitted. These consolidated financial statements should
be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K annual report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Management’s
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is
intended to assist in understanding the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. The information contained in this section
should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes. The following discussion reviews
the Company’s consolidated financial condition at December 31, 2008, and the
results of operations for the three- and six-month periods ended December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
Forward Looking
Statements
This
document, including information incorporated by reference, contains
forward-looking statements about the Company and its subsidiaries which we
believe are within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995. These forward-looking statements may include, without
limitation, statements with respect to anticipated future operating and
financial performance, growth opportunities, interest rates, cost savings and
funding advantages expected or anticipated to be realized by
management. Words such as “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,”
“believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan” and similar
expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements by the Company and its
management are based on beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations,
anticipations, estimates and intentions of management and are not guarantees of
future performance. The important factors we discuss below, as well
as other factors discussed under the caption “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and identified in our
filings with the SEC and those presented elsewhere by our management from time
to time, could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by
the forward-looking statements made in this document:
·
|
the
strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the
local economies in which we conduct
operations;
|
·
|
the
strength of the real estate market in the local economies in which we
conduct operations;
|
·
|
the
effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws,
including interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve
Board;
|
·
|
inflation,
interest rate, market and monetary
fluctuations;
|
·
|
the
timely development of and acceptance of our new products and services and
the perceived overall value of these products and services by users,
including the features, pricing and quality compared to competitors'
products and services;
|
·
|
the
willingness of users to substitute our products and services for products
and services of our competitors;
|
·
|
the
impact of changes in financial services' laws and regulations (including
laws concerning taxes, banking, securities and
insurance);
|
·
|
the
impact of technological changes;
|
·
|
acquisitions;
|
12
·
|
changes
in consumer spending and saving habits;
and
|
·
|
our
success at managing the risks involved in the
foregoing.
|
The
Company disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking
statements based on the occurrence of future events, the receipt of new
information, or otherwise.
Critical Accounting
Policies
Accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America are complex and
require management to apply significant judgments to various accounting,
reporting and disclosure matters. Management of the Company must use
assumptions and estimates to apply these principles where actual measurement is
not possible or practical. For a complete discussion of the Company’s
significant accounting policies, see “Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements” in the Company’s 2008 Annual Report. Certain policies are
considered critical because they are highly dependent upon subjective or complex
judgments, assumptions and estimates. Changes in such estimates may
have a significant impact on the financial statements. Management has
reviewed the application of these policies with the Audit Committee of the
Company’s Board of Directors. For a discussion of applying critical
accounting policies, see “Critical Accounting Policies” beginning on page 11 in
the Company’s 2008 Annual Report.
Executive
Summary
Our
results of operations depend primarily on our net interest margin, which is
directly impacted by the interest rate environment. The net interest
margin represents interest income earned on interest-earning assets (primarily
mortgage loans, commercial loans and the investment portfolio), less interest
expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities (primarily certificates of deposit,
savings, interest-bearing demand accounts and borrowed funds), as a percentage
of average interest-earning assets. Net interest margin is directly
impacted by the spread between long-term interest rates and short-term interest
rates, as our interest-earning assets, particularly those with initial terms to
maturity or repricing greater than one year, generally price off longer term
rates while our interest-bearing liabilities generally price off shorter term
interest rates.
Our net interest income is also impacted
by the shape of the market yield curve. A steep yield curve – in
which the difference in interest rates between short term and long term periods
is relatively large – could be beneficial to our net interest income, as the
interest rate spread between our additional interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities would be larger. Conversely, a flat or
flattening yield curve, in which the difference in rates between short term and
long term periods is relatively small or shrinking, or an inverted yield curve,
in which short term rates exceed long term rates, could have an adverse impact
on our net interest income, as our interest rate spread could
decrease.
Our
results of operations may also be affected significantly by general and local
economic and competitive conditions, particularly those with respect to changes
in market interest rates, government policies and actions of regulatory
authorities.
During the first six months of fiscal 2009, we grew our
balance sheet by $35.4
million; this above-trend growth was due to the leveraged use of $9.6 million in
preferred capital invested by the U.S. Treasury Department under the terms of
their Capital Purchase Program. This additional growth primarily
reflected an $18.4 million
increase in available-for-sale investments, an $8.2 million increase in total net
loans, a $28.6 million increase in borrowed funds, and
a $6.2 million decrease in
deposits (the decrease was
primarily due to public fund withdrawals, most of which was anticipated, and
scheduled draws on bond proceeds). The growth in available-for-sale
investments was primarily in the form of collateralized mortgage obligations
(CMOs) and municipal bonds. The growth in loans was primarily due to
commercial and commercial
real estate loan
growth. The increase in borrowed funds related to advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB),
and was used to fund
investment and loan growth and offset deposit
losses.
The
Treasury Department created the Capital Purchase Program with the intention of
building capital at U.S. financial institutions in order to increase the flow of
financing to U.S. businesses and consumers, and to support the U.S.
economy. As of December 31, 2008, the Company has contributed to the
accomplishment of that objective by leveraging the Treasury’s investment to
increase loan balances by $8.2 million in the current fiscal year, and by $31.6
million over the last twelve months. Additionally, the Company has purchased $15
million in agency-backed collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) and $4.5
million in municipal debt since the Treasury investment was made, helping to
improve the availability of credit in two distressed markets. These
are investment purchases that the Company would not likely have made, absent the
Treasury investment. Including both direct loans and investment
securities, the Company has increased its investment in credit markets by $52.6
million over the last twelve months.
Our net income for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 increased
1.7% to $888,000, as compared to $873,000 earned during the same period of
the prior year. The increase in net income compared to the
year-ago period was primarily due to a 24.8% increase in net interest income,
partially offset by a 60.1% decrease in non-interest income – the result of a
charge to record the
13
other-than-temporary
impairment of the bank’s investment in a trust preferred pool – a 122.2%
increase in loan loss provisions, and an 11.6% increase in non-interest
expense. Diluted earnings per share for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 were
$0.40, as compared to $0.39 for the second quarter of fiscal
2008. For the
first six months of fiscal 2008, net income increased 7.6% to $1.8 million, as compared to $1.7 million earned during the same period
of the prior year. The increase in net income compared to the
year-ago period was
primarily due to a 27.9%
increase in net interest income, partially offset by a 51.6% decrease in non-interest
income – the result of
charges to record the other-than-temporary impairment of Company investments – a
200% increase in loan loss provisions, and a 9.5% increase in non-interest
expense. For both the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2009, our increase in net
interest income was due primarily to an increase in average interest rate
spread, as well as an increase in average interest-earning
assets.
Short-term market rates fell
substantially during the first six months of fiscal 2009, following an already
substantial decline over the prior fiscal year. From October to
December, 2008, the Federal Reserve cut rates from 2.00% to a range of 0.00% to
0.25%. The six-month treasury bill rate declined by almost 200 basis
points (to less than .30%); the two-year treasury note declined almost 200 basis
points (to 0.76%); and the ten-year treasury bond declined by almost 175 basis
points (to 2.25%). The market was particularly volatile as concern
shifted from inflation, to the credit market crisis, and then to the
sustainability of economic growth. Despite the volatility, the curve
remained generally quite steep by recent historical comparisons, which is
generally to the Company’s benefit. In this rate environment, our net
interest margin increased 41 basis points when comparing the first six months of
fiscal 2009 to the same
period of the prior year.
The Company’s net income is also
affected by the level of non-interest income and operating
expenses. Non-interest income consists primarily of service charges,
ATM and loan fees, and other general operating income. Operating
expenses consist primarily of salaries and employee benefits, occupancy-related
expenses, postage, insurance, advertising, professional fees, office expenses,
and other general operating expenses. During the six-month period ended December 31, 2008, non-interest income decreased
51.6% compared to the same period of the
prior fiscal year, primarily due to charges incurred to recognize the
other-than-temporary impairment of Company investments. Outside those charges, non-interest income would have
increased 5.5%, due to increased debit card
activity and non-sufficient
funds fee collections. Non-interest expense
increased for the six-month period ended December 31, 2008, by 9.5%, compared to the same period of the
prior fiscal year, primarily in the categories of compensation and
benefits and deposit
insurance assessments.
Our charges incurred to recognize the
other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) of available-for-sale investments related
to investments in Freddie Mac preferred stock ($304,000 loss realized in the
first quarter of fiscal 2009) and a pooled trust preferred collateralized debt
obligation ($375,000 loss realized in the second quarter of fiscal
2009). The Company currently holds three additional collateralized
debt obligations (CDOs) which have not been deemed other-than-temporarily
impaired, based on the Company’s best judgment using information currently
available. All of these investments are described in the table
below:
Unrealized
|
Estimated
|
S&P
|
Moody’s
|
||||||||||||||
Security
|
Amortized Cost
|
Gains / (Losses)
|
Fair Value
|
Rating
|
Rating
|
||||||||||||
Freddie
Mac Preferred Stock Series Z
|
$ | - | $ | 1,215 | $ | 1,215 |
C
|
Ca
|
|||||||||
Trapeza
CDO IV, Ltd., class C2
|
125,000 | (72,006 | ) | 52,994 |
NR
|
Ca
|
|||||||||||
Trapeza
CDO XIII, Ltd., class A2A
|
476,224 | (256,224 | ) | 220,000 |
BB+
|
Aaa
|
|||||||||||
Trapeza
CDO XIII, Ltd., class B
|
476,938 | (356,938 | ) | 120,000 |
NR
|
Aa2
|
|||||||||||
Preferred
Term Securities XXIV, Ltd., class B1
|
433,472 | (344,307 | ) | 89,165 |
NR
|
Aa2
|
|||||||||||
Totals
|
$ | 1,511,634 | $ | (1,029,475 | ) | $ | 482,159 |
The
Company determined the amount of OTTI charges to record on the Freddie Mac
Preferred Stock based on quoted market prices, and on the Trapeza IV CDO based
on the estimated present value of expected cash flows on the instruments,
discounted using a current market rate on such securities. For the Trapeza
XIII CDOs and the Preferred Term Securities pooled trust preferred investments,
the Company expects to receive principal and interest in full without a material
change in the scheduled interest payments, based on a review of the terms of the
obligation and the financial strength of the underlying firms.
We expect
to continue to grow our assets modestly through the origination and occasional
purchase of loans, and purchases of investment securities. The
primary funding for our asset growth is expected to come from retail deposits,
short- and long-term FHLB borrowings, and, as needed, brokered certificates of
deposit. We intend to grow deposits by offering desirable deposit
products for our existing customers and by attracting new depository
relationships. We will continue to explore branch expansion
opportunities in market areas that we believe present attractive opportunities
for our strategic business model.
14
Comparison of Financial
Condition at December 31, 2008, and June 30, 2008
The
Company’s total assets increased by $35.4 million, or 8.5%, to $453.3 million at
December 31, 2008, as compared to $417.8 million at June 30,
2008. Available-for-sale investment balances increased by $18.4
million, or 46.1%, to $58.3 million, as compared to $39.9 million at June 30,
2008. This growth was attributed to the Company’s leveraged use of
the investment by the U.S. Treasury Department of $9.6 million under its Capital
Purchase Program. Loans, net of the allowance for loan losses,
increased $8.2 million, or 2.4%, to $351.2 million at December 31, 2008, as
compared to $343.1 million at June 30, 2008. Commercial real estate
loan balances grew by $3.7 million, while commercial loans were up $2.5 million,
as the Company continues to focus on developing this business.
Asset
growth during the first nine months of fiscal 2008 has been funded primarily
with FHLB advances, which increased $28.6 million, or 44.7%, to $92.7 million at
December 31, 2008, as compared to $64.1 million at June 30,
2008. Deposits decreased $6.2 million, or 2.1%, to $286.0 million at
December 31, 2008, compared to $292.3 million at June 30, 2008. This
reflected public unit deposit runoff of $13.7 million, partially offset by
non-public deposit growth of $7.5 million. By account type, the
decrease in deposits was due to a $13.2 million decrease in money market
passbook savings and money market deposit accounts, a $3.6 million decrease in
certificates of deposit, and a $2.8 million decrease in statement saving
accounts, partially offset by checking account growth of $12.1 million, as the
Company introduced a new, high-rate “rewards checking”
product. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase totaled $25.5
million at December 31, 2008, an increase of $3.7 million, or 17.0%, compared to
$21.8 million at June 30, 2008.
Total
stockholders’ equity increased $9.8 million, or 32.1%, to $40.3 million at
December 31, 2008, as compared to $30.5 million at June 30, 2008. The
increase was primarily due to the $9.6 million investment in preferred equity by
the U.S. Treasury Department under the terms of its Capital Purchase
Program. Additionally, capital increased due to retention of net
income, an increase in the market value of the Company’s available-for-sale
investment portfolio, and the exercise of stock options outstanding, partially
offset by stock repurchases and cash dividends paid.
Average Balance Sheet for
the Three- and Six-Month Periods Ended December 31, 2008 and
2007
The
tables on the following pages present certain information regarding Southern
Missouri Bancorp, Inc.’s financial condition and net interest income for the
three- and six-month periods ending December 31, 2008 and 2007. The
tables present the annualized average yield on interest-earning assets and the
annualized average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. We derived
the yields and costs by dividing annualized income or expense by the average
balance of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities,
respectively, for the periods shown. Yields on tax-exempt obligations
were not computed on a tax equivalent basis.
15
Three-month
period ended
December 31, 2008
|
Three-month
period ended
December 31, 2007
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Average
Balance
|
Interest
and Dividends
|
Yield/
Cost
(%)
|
Average
Balance
|
Interest
and Dividends
|
Yield/
Cost
(%)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest
earning assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage
loans (1)
|
$ | 251,367,563 | $ | 4,209,253 | 6.70 | $ | 232,410,132 | $ | 4,150,302 | 7.14 | ||||||||||||||
Other
loans (1)
|
103,076,030 | 1,524,884 | 5.92 | 86,354,079 | 1,769,239 | 8.20 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
net loans
|
354,443,593 | 5,734,137 | 6.47 | 318,764,211 | 5,919,541 | 7.43 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
32,312,440 | 399,776 | 4.95 | 13,919,968 | 156,160 | 4.49 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investment
securities (2)
|
18,057,845 | 159,671 | 3.54 | 25,771,074 | 289,080 | 4.49 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other
interest earning assets
|
5,745,215 | 10,332 | 0.72 | 4,016,624 | 12,460 | 1.24 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
interest earning assets (1)
|
410,559,093 | 6,303,916 | 6.14 | 362,471,877 | 6,377,241 | 7.04 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other
noninterest earning assets (3)
|
24,780,987 | - | 24,582,025 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 435,340,080 | $ | 6,303,916 | $ | 387,053,902 | $ | 6,377,241 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest
bearing liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings
accounts
|
$ | 64,796,101 | $ | 326,194 | 2.01 | $ | 76,479,426 | $ | 690,995 | 3.61 | ||||||||||||||
NOW
accounts
|
42,999,550 | 202,129 | 1.88 | 31,154,693 | 107,129 | 1.38 | ||||||||||||||||||
Money
market deposit accounts
|
6,407,373 | 23,601 | 1.47 | 5,720,047 | 27,237 | 1.90 | ||||||||||||||||||
Certificates
of deposit
|
146,287,148 | 1,256,716 | 3.44 | 138,039,043 | 1,651,144 | 4.78 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
interest bearing deposits
|
260,490,172 | 1,808,640 | 2.78 | 251,393,209 | 2,476,505 | 3.94 | ||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities
sold under agreements
to
repurchase
|
24,110,814 | 52,526 | 0.87 | 19,408,098 | 207,435 | 4.28 | ||||||||||||||||||
FHLB
advances
|
84,841,304 | 884,732 | 4.17 | 57,270,121 | 768,463 | 5.37 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated
debt
|
7,217,000 | 99,819 | 5.53 | 7,217,000 | 153,627 | 8.51 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
interest bearing liabilities
|
376,659,290 | 2,845,717 | 3.02 | 335,288,428 | 3,606,030 | 4.30 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest
bearing demand deposits
|
24,426,808 | - | 19,996,122 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other
noninterest bearing liabilities
|
1,133,714 | - | 2,328,759 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
402,219,812 | 2,845,717 | 357,613,309 | 3,606,030 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders’
equity
|
33,120,268 | - | 29,440,593 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and
stockholders'
equity
|
$ | 435,340,080 | $ | 2,845,717 | $ | 387,053,902 | $ | 3,606,030 | ||||||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$ | 3,458,199 | $ | 2,771,211 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
rate spread (4)
|
3.12 | 2.74 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest margin (5)
|
3.37 | 3.06 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio
of average interest-earning assets
to
average interest-bearing liabilities
|
109.00 | % | 108.11 | % |
(1) Calculated
net of deferred loan fees, loan discounts and
loans-in-process. Non-accrual loans are included in average
loans.
(2) Includes
FHLB stock and related cash dividends.
(3)
|
Includes
average balances for fixed assets and BOLI of $8.2 million and $7.4
million, respectively, for the three-month period ending December 31,
2008, as compared to $8.5 million and $7.1 million for the same period of
the prior year.
|
(4)
|
Interest
rate spread represents the difference between the average rate on
interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing
liabilities.
|
(5)
|
Net
interest margin represents net interest income divided by average
interest-earning assets.
|
16
Six-month
period ended
December 31, 2008
|
Six-month
period ended
December 31, 2007
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Average
Balance
|
Interest
and Dividends
|
Yield/
Cost
(%)
|
Average
Balance
|
Interest
and Dividends
|
Yield/
Cost
(%)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest
earning assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage
loans (1)
|
$ | 248,237,472 | $ | 8,353,731 | 6.73 | $ | 229,225,628 | $ | 8,192,990 | 7.15 | ||||||||||||||
Other
loans (1)
|
103,748,862 | 3,169,900 | 6.11 | 88,684,499 | 3,637,860 | 8.20 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
net loans
|
351,986,334 | 11,523,631 | 6.55 | 317,910,127 | 11,830,850 | 7.44 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
30,310,641 | 754,200 | 4.98 | 12,471,177 | 281,226 | 4.51 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investment
securities (2)
|
17,624,941 | 336,480 | 3.82 | 26,368,621 | 578,567 | 4.39 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other
interest earning assets
|
5,580,958 | 32,080 | 1.15 | 3,430,637 | 19,229 | 1.12 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
interest earning assets (1)
|
405,502,874 | 12,646,391 | 6.24 | 360,180,562 | 12,709,871 | 7.06 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other
noninterest earning assets (3)
|
22,690,740 | - | 23,148,557 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 428,193,614 | $ | 12,646,391 | $ | 383,329,119 | $ | 12,709,871 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest
bearing liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings
accounts
|
$ | 67,603,440 | $ | 721,261 | 2.13 | $ | 77,122,565 | $ | 1,448,391 | 3.76 | ||||||||||||||
NOW
accounts
|
39,476,033 | 322,044 | 1.63 | 30,540,163 | 211,171 | 1.38 | ||||||||||||||||||
Money
market deposit accounts
|
7,709,289 | 60,979 | 1.58 | 5,800,505 | 54,937 | 1.89 | ||||||||||||||||||
Certificates
of deposit
|
147,568,287 | 2,537,987 | 3.44 | 135,254,993 | 3,288,137 | 4.86 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
interest bearing deposits
|
262,357,049 | 3,642,271 | 2.78 | 248,718,226 | 5,002,635 | 4.02 | ||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities
sold under agreements
to
repurchase
|
22,729,678 | 142,015 | 1.25 | 17,549,035 | 399,986 | 4.56 | ||||||||||||||||||
FHLB
advances
|
79,864,674 | 1,746,942 | 4.37 | 59,150,577 | 1,600,462 | 5.41 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated
debt
|
7,217,000 | 203,478 | 5.64 | 7,217,000 | 304,143 | 8.43 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
interest bearing liabilities
|
372,168,401 | 5,734,706 | 3.08 | 332,634,838 | 7,307,226 | 4.39 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest
bearing demand deposits
|
22,754,712 | - | 19,287,767 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other
noninterest bearing liabilities
|
1,264,282 | - | 2,184,647 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
396,187,395 | 5,734,706 | 354,107,252 | 7,307,226 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders’
equity
|
32,006,219 | - | 29,221,867 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and
stockholders'
equity
|
$ | 428,193,614 | $ | 5,734,706 | 383,329,119 | $ | 7,307,226 | |||||||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$ | 6,911,685 | 5,402,645 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
rate spread (4)
|
3.16 | 2.67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest margin (5)
|
3.41 | 3.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio
of average interest-earning assets
to
average interest-bearing liabilities
|
108.96 | % | 108.28 | % |
(1) Calculated
net of deferred loan fees, loan discounts and
loans-in-process. Non-accrual loans are included in average
loans.
(2) Includes
FHLB stock and related cash dividends.
(3)
|
Includes
average balances for fixed assets and BOLI of $8.2 million and $7.3
million, respectively, for the six-month period ending December 31, 2008,
as compared to $8.5 million and $7.1 million for the same period of the
prior year.
|
(4)
|
Interest
rate spread represents the difference between the average rate on
interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing
liabilities.
|
(5)
|
Net
interest margin represents net interest income divided by average
interest-earning assets
|
17
Results of Operations –
Comparison of the three- and six-month periods ended December 31, 2008 and
2007
General. Net income
for the three- and six-month periods ended December 31, 2008, was $888,000 and
$1.81 million, respectively, increases of $15,000, or 1.7%, and $128,000, or
7.6%, respectively, as compared to the same periods of the prior fiscal
year. Basic and diluted earnings per common share were $0.40 for the
second quarter and $0.82 for the first six months
of fiscal 2009, compared to
$0.40 basic and $0.39 diluted earnings per share for the
second quarter, and $0.77
basic and $0.76 diluted for the first six months of fiscal 2008. Our
annualized return on average assets for the three- and six-month periods ended December 31, 2008, was .82% and 0.85%, respectively, compared to .90% and 0.88%, respectively, for the same periods of the prior fiscal year. Our return on average
common stockholders’ equity for the
three- and six-month periods ended December 31, 2008, was 11.2% and 11.6%, respectively, compared to 11.9% and 11.5%, respectively, for the same periods of the prior fiscal year.
Net Interest
Income. Net interest income for the three- and six-month
periods ended December 31, 2008, was $3.5 million and $6.9 million,
respectively, increases of $687,000, or 24.8%, and $1.5 million, or 27.9%,
respectively, as compared to the same periods of the prior fiscal
year. For both the three- and six-month periods, the increases
reflected an expansion of our net interest rate spread, and our growth
initiatives, which resulted in increases in the average balances of both
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Our
interest rate spread was 3.12% and 3.16%, respectively for the three- and
six-month periods ended December 31, 2008, as compared to 2.74% and 2.67%,
respectively, for the same periods of the prior fiscal year. For the
three- and six-month periods ended December 31, 2008, our net interest margin,
determined by dividing the annualized net interest income by total average
interest-earning assets, was 3.37% and 3.41%, respectively, compared to 3.06%
and 3.00%, respectively, for the same periods of the prior fiscal year. The increase in interest rate spread for
the three-month period resulted from a 128 basis point decrease in the average
cost of interest-bearing liabilities, partially offset by a 90 basis point decrease in the average yield
on interest-earning assets. For the six-month period, the increase
in interest rate spread resulted from a 131 basis point decrease in the average
cost of interest-bearing liabilities, partially offset by an 82 basis point
decrease in the average yield on interest-earning
assets. Expansion of our interest rate spread
was attributed primarily to the faster re-pricing of liabilities (compared to
assets) on the Company’s balance sheet in a falling rate
environment, combined with
the improved slope of the yield curve.
Interest
Income. Total interest income for the three- and six-month
periods ended December 31, 2008, was $6.3 million and $12.6 million,
respectively, decreases of $73,000, or 1.2%, and $63,000, or 0.5%, respectively,
from the amounts earned in the same periods of the prior fiscal year. The
decreases were due to the 90 and 82 basis point decreases, respectively, in the
yield on interest-earning assets, partially offset by increases of $48.1
million, or 13.3%, and $45.3 million, or 12.6%, respectively, in the average
balance of interest-earning assets during the three- and six-month periods ended
December 31, 2008. For the three-and six-month periods ended December
31, 2008, the average interest rate on interest-earning assets was 6.14% and
6.24%, respectively, as compared to 7.04% and 7.06%, respectively, for the same
periods of the prior year.
Interest
Expense. Total interest expense for the three- and six-month
periods ended December 31, 2008, was $2.9 million and $5.7 million,
respectively, decreases of $760,000, or 21.1%, and $1.6 million, or 21.5%,
respectively, as compared to the same periods of the prior fiscal
year. The decreases were due to the 128 and 131 basis point
decreases, respectively, in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities,
partially offset by increases of $41.4 million, or 12.3%, and $39.5 million, or
11.9%, respectively, in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities
during the three- and six-month periods ended December 31, 2008. For
the three- and six-month periods ended December 31, 2008, the average interest
rate on interest-bearing liabilities was 3.02% and 3.08%, respectively, as
compared to 4.30% and 4.39%, respectively, for the same periods of the prior
fiscal year. The increase in the average balance of interest-bearing
liabilities was primarily due to funding needed for asset growth.
Provision for Loan
Losses. The provision for loan losses for the three- and
six-month periods ended December 31, 2008, was $200,000 and $600,000, as
compared to $90,000 and $200,000 for the same periods of the prior
year. The increase in provisions was primarily due to management’s
belief that it is appropriate to maintain larger reserves in light of continuing
deterioration of the credit and housing markets. In addition, the
Company’s growth, over the last several years, in its commercial and commercial
real estate loan portfolios has required increased provisions for loan losses,
as those loan types generally carry additional risk. In general,
however, the Company does not anticipate that it will realize the level of
credit problems that have been experienced by financial institutions more
heavily involved in either subprime or Alt-A residential lending, or
construction and development lending. Although we believe that we
have established and maintained the allowance for loan losses at adequate
levels, additions may be necessary as the loan portfolio grows, as economic
conditions remain poor, and as other conditions differ from the current
operating environment. Even though we use the best information
available, the level of the allowance for loan losses remains an estimate that
is subject to significant judgment and short-term change. (See
“Critical Accounting Policies”, “Allowance for Loan Loss Activity” and
“Nonperforming Assets”).
18
Non-interest
Income. Non-interest income for the three- and six-month
periods ended December 31, 2008, was $240,000 and $576,000, respectively,
decreases of $362,000, or 60.1%, and $614,000, or 51.6%, compared to the same
periods of the prior fiscal year. The decreases were primarily due to the charges incurred to recognize the
other-than-temporary
impairment of investments held by the Company. Outside those charges, non-interest income would have increased 2.2% and
5.5%, respectively, in the three- and six-month periods ended December 31, 2008,
attributable to increased debit card activity fees and secondary market loan
sale income in the three-month period, and attributable to debit card activity
fees and NSF fee collections in the six-month period.
Non-interest
Expense. Non-interest expense for the three- and six-month
periods ended December 31, 2008, was $2.2 million and $4.2 million,
respectively, increases of $228,000, or 11.6%, and $369,000, or 9.5%,
respectively, compared to the same periods of the prior fiscal
year. For both the three- and six-month periods ended December 31,
2008, the increases in non-interest expense were primarily in the categories of compensation and
benefits and deposit
insurance assessments. Compensation increases were
attributed to general increases in compensation levels and the addition of key
personnel. Deposit insurance assessment increases were attributed to
the exhaustion of the Bank’s one-time credit provided under the new deposit
insurance assessment program instituted by the FDIC in 2006. Going
forward, additional increases are expected as the FDIC increases the baseline
assessment rate and assesses surcharges related to the use of collateralized
borrowings by financial institutions in an attempt to replenish the
DIF. As the
Company continues to grow its balance sheet, non-interest expense will continue
to increase due to compensation, expenses related to expansion, and
inflation. Our efficiency ratio, determined by dividing total
non-interest expense by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income,
was 59.7% and 56.7%, respectively, for the three- and six-month periods ended
December 31, 2008, as compared to 58.6% and 58.8%, respectively, for the same
periods of the prior fiscal year.
Income
Taxes. Provisions for income taxes for the three- and
six-month periods ended December 31, 2008, were $405,000 and $830,000,
respectively, decreases of $28,000, or 6.5%, and $2,000, or 0.3%, compared to
the same periods of the prior fiscal year. Our effective tax rate for
the three- and six-month periods ended December 31, 2008, was 31.3% and 31.4%,
respectively, as compared to 33.1% and 33.0%, respectively, for the same periods
of the prior fiscal year. For both the three-and six-month periods,
the decrease in the effective tax rate was attributable to the Company’s
investment in tax-exempt securities and purchases of tax credits; the decrease
in tax provisions was due to the lower effective tax rate, partially offset by
higher pre-tax income.
Allowance for Loan Loss
Activity
The
Company regularly reviews its allowance for loan losses and makes adjustments to
its balance based on management’s analysis of the loan portfolio, the amount of
non-performing and classified assets, as well as general economic
conditions. Although the Company maintains its allowance for loan
losses at a level that it considers sufficient to provide for losses, there can
be no assurance that future losses will not exceed internal
estimates. In addition, the amount of the allowance for loan losses
is subject to review by regulatory agencies, which can order the establishment
of additional loss provisions. The following table summarizes changes
in the allowance for loan losses over the six months ended December 31, 2008 and
2007:
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$ | 3,567,203 | $ | 2,537,659 | ||||
Loans
charged off:
|
||||||||
Residential
real estate
|
(19,382 | ) | (11,150 | ) | ||||
Commercial
business
|
(206,841 | ) | - | |||||
Commercial
real estate
|
(10,495 | ) | - | |||||
Consumer
|
(34,850 | ) | (39,571 | ) | ||||
Gross
charged off loans
|
(271,568 | ) | (50,721 | ) | ||||
Recoveries
of loans previously charged off:
|
||||||||
Residential
real estate
|
15 | - | ||||||
Commercial
business
|
100 | 162,813 | ||||||
Consumer
|
4,908 | 1,873 | ||||||
Gross
recoveries of charged off loans
|
5,023 | 164,686 | ||||||
Net
charge offs
|
(266,545 | ) | 113,965 | |||||
Provision
charged to expense
|
600,000 | 200,000 | ||||||
Balance,
end of period
|
$ | 3,900,658 | $ | 2,851,624 | ||||
Ratio
of net charge offs during the period
to
average loans outstanding during the period
|
0.08 | % | -0.04 | % |
19
The
allowance for loan losses has been calculated based upon an evaluation of
pertinent factors underlying the various types and quality of the Company’s
loans. Management considers such factors as the repayment status of a
loan, the estimated net fair value of the underlying collateral, the borrower’s
intent and ability to repay the loan, local economic conditions, and the
Company’s historical loss ratios. We maintain the allowance for loan
losses through the provisions for loan losses that we charge to
income. We charge losses on loans against the allowance for loan
losses when we believe the collection of loan principal is unlikely. The
allowance for loan losses increased $333,000 to $3.9 million at December 31,
2008, from $3.6 million at June 30, 2008. At December 31, 2008, the
Bank had $4.9 million, or 1.08% of total assets, adversely classified ($4.9
million classified “substandard” none classified “doubtful” or “loss”), as
compared to adversely classified assets of $4.5 million, or 1.07% of total
assets at June 30, 2008, and $4.1 million, or 1.04% of total assets, adversely
classified at December 31, 2007. Adversely classified loans were
generally comprised of loans secured by commercial real estate, agricultural
real estate, or inventory and equipment, and all were performing in accordance
with terms at December 31, 2008. All were classified due to concerns
as to the borrowers’ ability to generate sufficient cash flows to service the
debt.
While
management believes that our asset quality remains strong, it recognizes that,
due to the continued growth in the loan portfolio and potential changes in
market conditions, our level of nonperforming assets and resulting charge offs
may fluctuate. Higher levels of net charge offs requiring additional provisions
for loan losses could result. Although management uses the best
information available, the level of the allowance for loan losses remains an
estimate that is subject to significant judgment and short-term
change.
Nonperforming
Assets
The ratio
of nonperforming assets to total assets and non-performing loans to net loans
receivable is another measure of asset quality. Nonperforming assets
of the Company include nonaccruing loans, accruing loans delinquent/past
maturity 90 days or more, and assets which have been acquired as a result of
foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. The table on the
following page summarizes changes in the Company’s level of nonperforming assets
over selected time periods:
12/31/2008
|
6/30/2008
|
12/31/2007
|
||||||||||
Loans
past maturity/delinquent 90 days or more and non-accrual
loans
|
||||||||||||
Residential
real estate
|
$ | 184,000 | $ | - | $ | 30,000 | ||||||
Commercial
real estate
|
- | - | 20,000 | |||||||||
Consumer
|
- | 6,000 | 8,000 | |||||||||
Total
loans past maturity/delinquent 90 days or more and non-accrual
loans
|
184,000 | 6,000 | 58,000 | |||||||||
Foreclosed
real estate or other real estate owned
|
168,000 | 38,000 | 86,000 | |||||||||
Other
repossessed assets
|
111,000 | 24,000 | 31,000 | |||||||||
Total
nonperforming assets
|
$ | 463,000 | $ | 68,000 | $ | 175,000 | ||||||
Percentage
nonperforming assets to total assets
|
0.10 | % | 0.02 | % | 0.04 | % | ||||||
Percentage
nonperforming loans to net loans
|
0.05 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.02 | % |
At December 31, 2008, non-performing assets totaled
$463,000, up from $68,000 at June 30, 2008, and
$175,000 at December 31, 2007. A single relationship consisting of two
delinquent loans and one parcel of foreclosed real estate accounts for the
increase in those non-performing asset classes. Most of the increase in other
repossessed assets was due to collateral repossessed from a singe commercial borrower, to which most of
the increase in charge-offs for the six-month period ended December 31, 2008, was attributed (see Allowance
for Loan Loss Activity).
Liquidity
Resources
The term
“liquidity” refers to our ability to generate adequate amounts of cash to fund
loan originations, loans purchases, deposit withdrawals and operating expenses.
Our primary sources of funds include deposit growth, securities sold under
agreements to repurchase, FHLB advances, brokered deposits, amortization and
prepayment of loan principal and interest, investment maturities and sales, and
funds provided by our operations. While the scheduled loan repayments and
maturing investments are relatively predictable, deposit flows, FHLB advance
redemptions, and loan and security prepayment rates are significantly influenced
by factors outside of the Bank’s control, including interest rates, general and
local economic conditions and competition in the marketplace. The
Bank relies on FHLB advances and brokered deposits as additional sources for
funding cash or liquidity needs.
The
Company uses its liquid resources principally to satisfy its ongoing cash
requirements, which include funding loan commitments, funding maturing
certificates of deposit and deposit withdrawals, maintaining liquidity, funding
maturing or called FHLB advances, purchasing investments, and meeting operating
expenses. At December 31, 2008, the Company had outstanding
commitments to fund approximately $50.5 million in mortgage and non-mortgage
loans. These commitments are
20
expected
to be funded through existing cash balances, cash flow from normal operations
and, if needed, FHLB advances. At December 31, 2008, the Bank had
pledged its residential real estate loan portfolio and a significant portion of
its commercial real estate portfolio with the FHLB for available credit of
approximately $129.7 million, of which $92.7 million had been advanced
(additionally, letters of credit totaling $3.5 million had been issued on the
Bank’s behalf in order to secure public unit funding). The Bank has
the ability to pledge several of its other loan portfolios, including home
equity and commercial business loans, which could provide additional collateral
for additional borrowings; in total, FHLB borrowings are generally limited to
40% of Bank assets, or $178.2 million, which means $85.5 million in borrowings
remain available. Along with the ability to borrow from the FHLB,
management believes its liquid resources will be sufficient to meet the
Company’s liquidity needs.
Regulatory
Capital
The Bank
is subject to minimum regulatory capital requirements pursuant to regulations
adopted by the federal banking agencies. The requirements address
both risk-based capital and leverage capital. As of December 31,
2008, and June 30, 2008, the Bank met all applicable adequacy
requirements.
The FDIC
has in place qualifications for banks to be classified as
“well-capitalized.” As of December 31, 2008, the most recent
notification from the FDIC categorized the Bank as
“well-capitalized.” There were no conditions or events since the FDIC
notification that has changed the Bank’s classification.
The
Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios are also presented in the following
tables.
Actual
|
For
Capital Adequacy Purposes
|
To
Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action
Provisions
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
|||||||||||||||||||
As
of December 31, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
Capital
(to
Risk-Weighted Assets)
|
$ | 41,864,000 | 12.93 | % | $ | 25,906,000 | 8.00 | % | $ | 32,383,000 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier
I Capital
(to
Risk-Weighted Assets)
|
37,963,000 | 11.72 | % | 12,953,000 | 4.00 | % | 19,430,000 | 6.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier
I Capital
(to
Average Assets)
|
37,963,000 | 8.87 | % | 17,123,000 | 4.00 | % | 21,404,000 | 5.00 | % |
Actual
|
For
Capital Adequacy Purposes
|
To
Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action
Provisions
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
|||||||||||||||||||
As
of June 30, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
Risk-Based Capital
(to
Risk-Weighted Assets)
|
$ | 36,302,000 | 11.79 | % | $ | 24,631,000 | 8.00 | % | $ | 30,789,000 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier
I Capital
(to
Risk-Weighted Assets)
|
32,735,000 | 10.63 | % | 12,315,000 | 4.00 | % | 18,473,000 | 6.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier
I Capital
(to
Average Assets)
|
32,735,000 | 8.08 | % | 16,214,000 | 4.00 | % | 20,267,000 | 5.00 | % |
21
PART I: Item
3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
SOUTHERN
MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
Asset and Liability
Management and Market Risk
The goal
of the Company’s asset/liability management strategy is to manage the interest
rate sensitivity of both interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities in order to maximize net interest income without exposing the Bank
to an excessive level of interest rate risk. The Company employs
various strategies intended to manage the potential effect that changing
interest rates may have on future operating results. The primary
asset/liability management strategy has been to focus on matching the
anticipated re-pricing intervals of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities. At times, however, depending on the level of general interest
rates, the relationship between long- and short-term interest rates, market
conditions and competitive factors, the Company may determine to increase its
interest rate risk position somewhat in order to maintain its net interest
margin.
In an
effort to manage the interest rate risk resulting from fixed rate lending, the
Bank has utilized longer term FHLB advances (with maturities up to ten years),
subject to early redemptions and fixed terms. Other elements of the
Company’s current asset/liability strategy include (i) increasing originations
of commercial business, commercial real estate, agricultural operating lines,
and agricultural real estate loans, which typically provide higher yields and
shorter repricing periods, but inherently increase credit risk; (ii) actively
soliciting less rate-sensitive deposits, and (iii) offering competitively-priced
money market accounts and CDs with maturities of up to five
years. The degree to which each segment of the strategy is achieved
will affect profitability and exposure to interest rate risk.
The
Company continues to originate long-term, fixed-rate residential
loans. During the first six months of fiscal year 2009, fixed rate
residential loan production totaled $8.1 million, as compared to $11.9 million
during the same period of the prior year. At December 31, 2008, the
fixed rate residential loan portfolio was $97.8 million with a weighted average
maturity of 208 months, as compared to $97.4 million at December 31, 2007, with
a weighted average maturity of 207 months. The Company originated
$6.8 million in adjustable-rate residential loans during the six-month period
ended December 31, 2008, as compared to $4.1 million during the same period of
the prior year. At December 31, 2008, fixed rate loans with remaining
maturities in excess of 10 years totaled $89.8 million, or 25.6% of net loans
receivable, as compared to $82.0 million, or 25.6% of net loans receivable at
December 31, 2007. The Company originated $29.3 million of fixed rate
commercial and commercial real estate loans during the six-month period ended
December 31, 2008, as compared to $29.4 million during the same period of the
prior year. At December 31, 2008, the fixed rate commercial and
commercial real estate loan portfolio was $112.6 million with a weighted average
maturity of 36 months, compared to $102.7 million at December 31, 2007, with a
weighted average maturity of 28 months. The Company originated $38.3
million in adjustable rate commercial and commercial real estate loans during
the six-month period ended December 31, 2008, as compared to $16.6 million
during the same period of the prior year. At December 31, 2008,
adjustable-rate home equity lines of credit totaled $9.6 million, as compared to
$6.7 million at December 31, 2007. Over the last several years, the
Company had maintained a relatively short weighted average life of its
investment portfolio; however, in anticipation of the current declining rate
environment, management began to expand the portfolio’s duration during the
prior fiscal year. At December 31, 2008, the portfolio’s
weighted-average life stands at 6.0 years, compared to 4.2 years at December 31,
2007. Management continues to focus on customer retention, customer
satisfaction, and offering new products to customers in order to increase the
Company’s amount of less rate-sensitive deposit accounts. The company
remains “liability-sensitive,” in that our liabilities generally re-price more
quickly than our assets. As we have reached what we expect to be the
bottom of the current interest rate cycle, it is anticipated that management
will seek to reduce the amount of sensitivity, but management does not expect to
achieve the ability to maintain its net interest margin in a rising rate
environment.
22
Interest Rate Sensitivity
Analysis
The following table sets forth as of
December 31, 2008, management’s estimates of the projected changes in net
portfolio value ("NPV") in the event of 100, 200, and 300 basis point ("bp")
instantaneous and permanent increases, and 100, 200, and 300 basis point
instantaneous and permanent decreases in market interest rates. Dollar amounts
are expressed in thousands.
BP Change
|
Estimated Net Portfolio
Value
|
NPV as % of PV of
Assets
|
|||||||||||||||||
in Rates
|
$ Amount
|
$ Change
|
% Change
|
NPV Ratio
|
Change
|
||||||||||||||
+300
|
$
|
20,327
|
$
|
(20,736
|
)
|
-50
|
%
|
4.78
|
%
|
-4.31
|
%
|
||||||||
+200
|
26,757
|
(14,306
|
)
|
-35
|
%
|
6.17
|
%
|
-2.92
|
%
|
||||||||||
+100
|
34,648
|
(6,415
|
)
|
-16
|
%
|
7.81
|
%
|
-1.28
|
%
|
||||||||||
NC
|
41,063
|
-
|
-
|
9.09
|
%
|
-
|
|||||||||||||
-100
|
44,516
|
3,453
|
8
|
%
|
9.73
|
%
|
0.64
|
%
|
|||||||||||
-200
|
47,118
|
6,055
|
15
|
%
|
10.20
|
%
|
1.11
|
%
|
|||||||||||
-300
|
49,258
|
8,195
|
20
|
%
|
10.58
|
%
|
1.49
|
%
|
Computations of prospective effects of
hypothetical interest rate changes are based on an internally generated model
using actual maturity and repricing schedules for the Bank’s loans and deposits,
and are based on numerous assumptions, including relative levels of market
interest rates, loan repayments and deposit run-offs, and should not be relied
upon as indicative of actual results. Further, the computations do not
contemplate any actions the Bank may undertake in response to changes in
interest rates.
Management cannot predict future
interest rates or their effect on the Bank’s NPV in the future. Certain
shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the computation
of NPV. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar
maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in differing degrees to
changes in market interest rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as
adjustable-rate loans, have an initial fixed rate period typically from one to
five years and over the remaining life of the asset changes in the interest rate
are restricted. In addition, the proportion of adjustable-rate loans in the
Bank’s portfolio could decrease in future periods due to refinancing activity if
market interest rates remain steady in the future. Further, in the event of a
change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels could deviate
significantly from those assumed in the table. Finally, the ability of many
borrowers to service their adjustable-rate debt may decrease in the event of an
interest rate increase.
The Bank’s Board of Directors (the
"Board") is responsible for reviewing the Bank’s asset and liability policies.
The Board’s Asset/Liability Committee meets monthly to review interest rate risk
and trends, as well as liquidity and capital ratios and requirements. The Bank’s
management is responsible for administering the policies and determinations of
the Board with respect to the Bank’s asset and liability goals and
strategies.
23
PART I: Item
4: Controls and Procedures
SOUTHERN
MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
An
evaluation of Southern Missouri Bancorp’s disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, (the “Act”)) as of December 31, 2008, was carried out under the
supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive and Financial
Officer, and several other members of our senior management. The
Chief Executive and Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2008,
the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that
the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files
or submits under the Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to management
(including the Chief Executive and Financial Officer) in a timely manner, and
(ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. There have been no changes in
our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Act) that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2008, that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
The
Company does not expect that its disclosures and procedures will prevent all
error and all fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well
conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance
that the objectives of the control procedure are met. Because of the
inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if
any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent
limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be
faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or
mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual
acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management
override of the control. The design of any control procedure also is
based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events,
and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its
stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the
inherent limitations in a cost-effective control procedure, misstatements due to
error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
24
PART II: Other
Information
SOUTHERN
MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
Item
1: Legal Proceedings
In the opinion of management, the
Company is not a party to any pending claims or
lawsuits that are expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or operations.
Periodically, there have been various claims and lawsuits involving the
Company mainly as a defendant, such as claims
to enforce liens, condemnation proceedings on properties in which the
Company holds security interests, claims
involving the making and servicing of real property loans and other issues
incident to the Company’s business. Aside from such pending
claims and lawsuits, which are incident to the conduct of the Company’s ordinary business, the Company is not a party to any material pending
legal proceedings that would have a material effect on the financial condition
or operations of the Company.
Item
1a: Risk Factors
The following risk factors represent
changes or additions to, and should be read in conjunction with, the risk
factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended June 30, 2008:
Difficult global market conditions and
economic trends have adversely affected our industry and, to a lesser extent,
our business.
Dramatic declines in the US housing
market, with decreasing home prices and increasing delinquencies and
foreclosures, have negatively impacted the credit performance of mortgage and
construction loans, and resulted in significant write-downs of assets by many
financial institutions. General downward economic trends, reduced availability
of commercial credit and increasing unemployment have negatively impacted the
credit performance of commercial and consumer credit, resulting in additional
write-downs. Concerns over the stability of the financial markets and the
economy have resulted in decreased lending by financial institutions to their
customers and to each other. This market turmoil and tightening of credit has
led to increased commercial and consumer deficiencies, lack of customer
confidence, increased market volatility, and widespread reduction in general
business activity. Financial institutions have experienced decreased access to
deposits or borrowings.
The resulting economic pressure on
consumers and businesses and the lack of confidence in the financial markets may
adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and
stock price.
Our ability to assess the
creditworthiness of customers and to estimate the losses inherent in our credit
exposure is made more complex by these difficult market and economic conditions.
We also expect to face increased regulation and government oversight as a result
of these downward trends. This increased government action may increase our
costs and limit our ability to pursue certain business opportunities. We expect
to pay higher Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) premiums than we have
over recent periods, because financial institution failures resulting from the
depressed market conditions have depleted and may continue to deplete the
deposit insurance fund and reduce its ratio of reserves to insured
deposits.
We do not believe these difficult
conditions are likely to improve in the near future. A worsening of these
conditions would likely exacerbate the adverse effects of these difficult market
and economic conditions on us, our customers, and the other financial
institutions in our market. As a result, we may experience increases in
foreclosures, delinquencies, and customer bankruptcies, as well as more
restricted access to funds.
Recent legislative and regulator
initiatives to address these difficult market and economic conditions may not
stabilize the US banking
system.
The recently-enacted Emergency Economic
Stabilization Act of 2008 ("EESA") authorizes the United States Department of
Treasury ("Treasury") to purchase from financial institutions and their holding
companies up to $750 billion in mortgage loans, mortgage-related securities, and
certain other financial instruments, including debt and equity securities issued
by financial institutions and their holding companies in a Troubled Asset Relief
Program ("TARP"). The purpose of the TARP is to restore confidence and stability
to the US banking system and to encourage financial institutions to increase
their lending to customers and to each other. The Treasury has allocated $250
billion under the TARP for a Capital Purchase Program ("CPP"). Under the CPP,
the Treasury will purchase debt or equity securities from participating
institutions. The TARP is also expected to include direct purchases or
guarantees of troubled assets of financial institutions.
The EESA also increased FDIC deposit
insurance on most accounts from $100,000 to $250,000. This increase is in place
until the end of 2009 and is not covered by deposit insurance premiums paid by
the banking industry. In addition, the
25
FDIC has implemented two temporary
programs to provide deposit insurance for the full amount of most non-interest
bearing transaction accounts through the end of 2009 and to guarantee certain
unsecured debt of financial institutions and their holding companies through June 2012. Financial institutions were required to decide by December 5, 2008,
whether to participate in the two programs (Southern Missouri elected to
participate in both programs). The purpose of these legislative and
regulatory actions is to stabilize the volatility in the US banking
system.
The EESA, the TARP, and the FDIC's
recent regulatory initiative may not stabilize the US banking system or
financial markets. If the volatility in the market and the economy continue or
worsen, our business, financial condition, results of operations, access to
funds, and the price of our stock could all be materially and adversely
impacted.
Item
2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
Period
|
Total
Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased
|
Average
Price Paid per Share (or Unit)
|
Total
Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans
or Programs
|
Maximum
Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet be
Purchased Under the Plans or Program
|
10/1/2008
thru
10/31/2008
|
66,857
|
$11.96
|
66,857
|
60,000
|
11/1/2008
thru 11/30/2008
|
60,000
|
$11.80
|
60,000
|
-
|
12/1/2008
thru 12/31/2008
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total
|
126,857
|
$11.89
|
126,857
|
-
|
As
previously disclosed in a Form 8-K Current Report on December 9, 2008, the
Company sold $9.6 million of preferred stock to the U.S. Treasury pursuant to
its Capital Purchase Program, and issued a warrant to purchase 114,326 shares of
common stock.
Item
3: Defaults upon Senior Securities
Not
applicable
Item
4: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders
None
Item 5 - Other
Information
None
Item 6 – Exhibits
(a)
|
Exhibits
|
|||
(3)
(a)
|
Certificate
of Incorporation of the Registrant++
|
|||
(3)
(b)
|
Bylaws
of the Registrant++
|
|||
(4)
|
Form
of Stock Certificate of Southern Missouri Bancorp+++
|
|||
(10)
|
Material
Contracts
|
|||
(a)
|
Registrant’s
Stock Option Plan*
|
|||
(b)
|
Southern
Missouri Savings Bank, FSB Management Recognition and Development
Plans*
|
|||
(c)
|
Employment
Agreements
|
|||
|
(i)
Greg A. Steffens**
|
|||
(d)
|
Director’s
Retirement Agreements
|
|||
(i)
|
Samuel
H. Smith***
|
|||
(ii)
|
Sammy
A. Schalk****
|
|||
(iii)
|
Ronnie
D. Black****
|
|||
(iv)
|
L.
Douglas Bagby****
|
|||
(v)
|
Rebecca
McLane Brooks*****
|
|||
(vi)
|
Charles
R. Love*****
|
|||
(vii)
|
Charles
R. Moffitt*****
|
|||
(viii)
|
Dennis
Robison
|
|||
(e)
|
Tax
Sharing Agreement***
|
|||
31
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification
|
|||
32
|
Section
1350 Certification
|
26
++ | Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 1999 |
+++
|
Filed
as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-2320) as filed with the SEC on January 3, 1994.
|
* | Filed as an exhibit to the registrant’s 1994 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement dated October 21, 1994. |
** | Filed as an exhibit to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 1999. |
*** | Filed as an exhibit to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 1995. |
**** | Filed as an exhibit to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2000. |
***** | Filed as an exhibit to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2004. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
SOUTHERN
MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
|
||
Registrant
|
||
Date: Feburary
13, 2008
|
/s/
Samuel H. Smith
|
|
Samuel
H. Smith
|
||
Chairman
of the Board of Directors
|
||
Date: February
13, 2008
|
/s/
Greg A. Steffens
|
|
Greg
A. Steffens
|
||
President
(Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting
Officer)
|