SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC. - Quarter Report: 2009 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
quarterly period ended March 31,
2009
OR
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the transition period from
__________ to __________
Commission
file number 0-23406
Southern Missouri Bancorp,
Inc.
|
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its
charter)
|
Missouri
|
43-1665523
|
|
(State
or jurisdiction of incorporation)
|
(IRS
employer id. no.)
|
531 Vine
Street Poplar Bluff,
MO 63901
|
(Address
of principal executive
offices) (Zip
code)
|
(573) 778-1800
|
Registrant's
telephone number, including area
code
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes x No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data file required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the proceeding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell corporation (as defined in Rule
12 b-2 of the Exchange Act)
Yes o No
x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated
filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check
one):
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting company x
|
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date:
Class
|
Outstanding at May 15,
2009
|
|
Common
Stock, Par Value $.01
|
2,087,976
Shares
|
SOUTHERN
MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
FORM
10-Q
INDEX
PART
I.
|
Financial
Information
|
PAGE
NO.
|
Item
1.
|
Consolidated
Financial Statements
|
|
- Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
3
|
|
- Consolidated
Statements of Income and
|
4
|
|
Comprehensive
Income
|
||
- Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
5
|
|
- Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
6
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
12
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
22
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
24
|
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
25
|
Item
1a.
|
Risk
Factors
|
25
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
26
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
upon Senior Securities
|
26
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
26
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
26
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
26
|
- Signature
Page
|
27
|
|
- Certifications
|
28
|
|
PART I: Item
1: Consolidated Financial Statements
SOUTHERN
MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
MARCH
31, 2009, AND JUNE 30, 2008
March 31, 2009
|
June 30, 2008
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 9,008,524 | $ | 6,042,408 | ||||
Interest-bearing
time deposits
|
- | 1,980,000 | ||||||
Available
for sale securities
|
58,542,439 | 39,915,280 | ||||||
Stock
in FHLB of Des Moines
|
4,592,300 | 3,323,700 | ||||||
Loans
receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of
$4,282,711
and $3,567,203 at March 31, 2009,
and
June 30, 2008, respectively
|
||||||||
358,436,695 | 343,069,775 | |||||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
3,103,173 | 3,011,777 | ||||||
Premises
and equipment, net
|
8,158,216 | 8,204,631 | ||||||
Bank
owned life insurance – cash surrender value
|
7,496,264 | 7,289,819 | ||||||
Intangible
assets, net
|
1,646,459 | 1,837,903 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
4,595,789 | 3,145,090 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 455,579,859 | $ | 417,820,383 | ||||
LIABILITIES
and STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
Deposits
|
$ | 306,698,547 | $ | 292,257,045 | ||||
Securities
sold under agreements to repurchase
|
26,234,268 | 21,803,513 | ||||||
Advances
from FHLB of Des Moines
|
72,500,000 | 64,050,000 | ||||||
Accounts
payable and other liabilities
|
787,206 | 821,407 | ||||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
1,017,108 | 1,199,769 | ||||||
Subordinated
debt
|
7,217,000 | 7,217,000 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
414,454,129 | 387,348,734 | ||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
- | - | ||||||
Preferred
stock, $.01 par value, $1,000 liquidation value;
500,000
shares authorized; 9,550 shares issued and outstanding
|
9,380,960 | - | ||||||
Common
stock, $.01 par value; 4,000,000 shares authorized;
2,957,226
shares issued
|
29,572 | 29,572 | ||||||
Warrants
to acquire common stock
|
169,040 | - | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
16,334,011 | 16,675,839 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
29,296,154 | 27,364,219 | ||||||
Treasury
stock of 869,250 shares at March 31, 2009, and
766,393
shares at June 30, 2008, at cost
|
(13,994,800 | ) | (13,002,803 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss - AFS securities
|
(120,702 | ) | (626,673 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income - FAS 158
|
31,495 | 31,495 | ||||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
41,125,730 | 30,471,649 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 455,579,859 | $ | 417,820,383 |
See Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
SOUTHERN
MISSOURI BANCORP, INC
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR
THE THREE- AND NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
(Unaudited)
Three
months ended
|
Nine
months ended
|
|||
March
31,
|
March
31,
|
|||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|
INTEREST
INCOME:
|
||||
Loans
|
$ 5,613,302
|
$ 5,756,757
|
$ 17,136,933
|
$ 17,587,607
|
Investment
securities
|
163,294
|
298,506
|
499,774
|
877,073
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
510,534
|
294,284
|
1,264,734
|
575,510
|
Other
interest-earning assets
|
2,769
|
36,137
|
34,849
|
55,365
|
Total
interest income
|
6,289,899
|
6,385,684
|
18,936,290
|
19,095,555
|
INTEREST
EXPENSE:
|
||||
Deposits
|
1,736,540
|
2,273,501
|
5,378,811
|
7,276,137
|
Securities
sold under agreements to repurchase
|
44,959
|
183,894
|
186,974
|
583,880
|
Advances
from FHLB of Des Moines
|
851,239
|
717,801
|
2,598,181
|
2,318,263
|
Subordinated
debt
|
81,708
|
134,625
|
285,186
|
438,767
|
Total
interest expense
|
2,714,446
|
3,309,821
|
8,449,152
|
10,617,047
|
NET
INTEREST INCOME
|
3,575,453
|
3,075,863
|
10,487,138
|
8,478,508
|
PROVISION
FOR LOAN LOSSES
|
410,000
|
350,000
|
1,010,000
|
550,000
|
NET
INTEREST INCOME AFTER
|
||||
PROVISION
FOR LOAN LOSSES
|
3,165,453
|
2,725,863
|
9,477,138
|
7,928,508
|
NONINTEREST
INCOME:
|
||||
Customer
service charges
|
266,096
|
315,527
|
922,441
|
937,597
|
Loan
late charges
|
40,108
|
40,572
|
115,230
|
106,467
|
Increase
in cash surrender value of bank
owned
life insurance
|
67,036
|
68,632
|
206,445
|
206,364
|
Net
realized gains on sale of AFS securities
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
6,084
|
AFS
securities losses due to other-than-
temporary-impairment
|
-
|
-
|
(678,973)
|
-
|
Other
|
208,818
|
176,531
|
592,900
|
534,346
|
Total
noninterest income
|
582,058
|
601,262
|
1,158,043
|
1,790,858
|
NONINTEREST
EXPENSE:
|
||||
Compensation
and benefits
|
1,269,556
|
1,117,020
|
3,642,457
|
3,265,860
|
Occupancy
and equipment, net
|
400,689
|
389,834
|
1,147,165
|
1,140,860
|
DIF
deposit insurance premium
|
132,217
|
7,644
|
222,979
|
22,660
|
Professional
fees
|
70,020
|
55,962
|
181,988
|
185,372
|
Advertising
|
50,397
|
38,278
|
153,851
|
137,660
|
Postage
and office supplies
|
77,163
|
67,686
|
221,216
|
204,874
|
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
63,814
|
63,814
|
191,443
|
191,442
|
Other
|
276,720
|
246,335
|
823,185
|
712,114
|
Total
noninterest expense
|
2,340,576
|
1,986,573
|
6,584,284
|
5,860,842
|
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
1,406,935
|
1,340,552
|
4,050,897
|
3,858,524
|
INCOME
TAXES
|
423,000
|
442,441
|
1,252,500
|
1,274,362
|
NET
INCOME
|
983,935
|
898,111
|
2,798,397
|
2,584,162
|
Effective
dividend on preferred shares
|
119,375
|
-
|
153,861
|
-
|
Net
income available to common shareholders
|
$ 864,560
|
$ 898,111
|
$ 2,644,536
|
$ 2,584,162
|
OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME, NET OF TAX:
|
||||
Net
income
|
$ 983,935
|
$ 898,111
|
$ 2,798,397
|
$ 2,584,162
|
Unrealized
gains on AFS securities,
net
of income taxes
|
246,312
|
123,355
|
505,971
|
552,185
|
Adjustment
for gains included in net income
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(6,084)
|
Total
other comprehensive income
|
246,312
|
123,355
|
505,971
|
546,101
|
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
|
$ 1,230,247
|
$ 1,021,466
|
$ 3,304,368
|
$ 3,130,263
|
Basic
earnings per common share
|
$ 0.42
|
$ 0.41
|
$ 1.24
|
$ 1.18
|
Diluted
earnings per common share
|
$ 0.42
|
$ 0.40
|
$ 1.24
|
$ 1.17
|
Dividends
per common share
|
$ 0.12
|
$ 0.10
|
$ 0.36
|
$ 0.30
|
See Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
SOUTHERN
MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR
THE THREE- AND NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
(Unaudited)
Nine
months ended
|
||||||||
March
31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities:
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 2,798,397 | $ | 2,584,162 | ||||
Items
not requiring (providing) cash:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
|
463,741 | 507,345 | ||||||
MRP
and SOP expense
|
51,801 | 54,142 | ||||||
AFS
losses due to other-than-temporary impairment
|
678,973 | - | ||||||
Net
realized gains on sale of AFS securities
|
- | (6,084 | ) | |||||
Gain
on sale of foreclosed assets
|
(18,974 | ) | (20,203 | ) | ||||
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
191,443 | 191,443 | ||||||
Increase
in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance
|
(206,445 | ) | (206,364 | ) | ||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
1,010,000 | 550,000 | ||||||
Net
amortization (accretion) of premiums and discounts on
securities
|
74,422 | (63,649 | ) | |||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(293,000 | ) | (503,999 | ) | ||||
Changes
in:
|
||||||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
(91,396 | ) | (336,952 | ) | ||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
110,727 | 76,876 | ||||||
Accounts
payable and other liabilities
|
(34,201 | ) | 490,954 | |||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
(182,661 | ) | (267,565 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
4,552,827 | 3,050,106 | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Net
increase in loans
|
(16,893,436 | ) | (19,888,934 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sales of available for sale securities
|
- | 233,500 | ||||||
Proceeds
from maturities of available for sale securities
|
5,203,501 | 19,929,465 | ||||||
Net
purchases of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
(1,268,600 | ) | (26,400 | ) | ||||
Purchases
of available-for-sale securities
|
(23,780,825 | ) | (27,881,179 | ) | ||||
Purchases
of premises and equipment
|
(417,326 | ) | (124,184 | ) | ||||
Investments
in state & federal tax credits
|
(1,263,944 | ) | - | |||||
Proceeds
from sale of foreclosed assets
|
233,750 | 464,787 | ||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(38,186,880 | ) | (27,292,945 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock issued
|
9,511,128 | - | ||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in demand deposits and savings
accounts
|
8,331,828 | (2,989,661 | ) | |||||
Net
increase in certificates of deposits
|
6,109,674 | 15,237,615 | ||||||
Net
increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
4,430,755 | 4,891,773 | ||||||
Proceeds
from Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
187,825,000 | 322,625,000 | ||||||
Repayments
of Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
(179,375,000 | ) | (317,125,000 | ) | ||||
Dividends
paid on common and preferred stock
|
(866,461 | ) | (660,653 | ) | ||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
161,000 | - | ||||||
Purchases
of treasury stock
|
(1,507,755 | ) | (165,361 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
34,620,169 | 21,813,713 | ||||||
Increase
(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
986,116 | (2,429,126 | ) | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
8,022,408 | 7,330,966 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 9,008,524 | $ | 4,901,840 | ||||
Supplemental
disclosures of
|
||||||||
Cash
flow information:
|
||||||||
Noncash investing and
financing activities:
|
||||||||
Conversion
of loans to foreclosed real estate
|
$ | 268,000 | $ | 344,788 | ||||
Conversion
of loans to other equipment
|
248,516 | 85,828 | ||||||
Cash paid during the
period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
(net of interest credited)
|
$ | 2,132,670 | $ | 3,953,773 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
1,526,405 | 1,430,393 |
See Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
SOUTHERN
MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Note
1: Basis of
Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim
financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Regulation S-X. Accordingly,
they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management, all material
adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary
for a fair presentation have been included. The consolidated balance
sheet of the Company as of June 30, 2008, has been derived from the audited
consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of that date. Operating
results for the three- and nine-month period ended March 31, 2009, are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal
year. For additional information, refer to the Company’s June 30,
2008, Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC and the Company’s annual report,
which contains the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal
years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Southern Missouri Bank & Trust Co.
(SMBT or Bank). All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Note
2: Fair
Value Measurements
Effective
July 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 has been applied
prospectively as of the beginning of the year/period.
SFAS No.
157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 also establishes a
fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair
value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used
to measure fair value:
Level 1
|
Quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities
|
Level 2
|
Observable
inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets
or liabilities; quoted prices in active markets that are not active; or
other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable
market data for substantially the full term of the assets or
liabilities
|
Level 3
|
Unobservable
inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are
significant to the fair value of the assets or
liabilities
|
Following
is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at
fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance
sheet, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the
valuation hierarchy.
Available-for-sale
Securities
Available-for-sale
securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Available-for-sale
securities is the only balance sheet category our Company is required, in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (US GAAP), to carry at fair value on a recurring basis. Securities
classified as available for sale are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2
inputs. For these securities, our Company obtains fair value measurements from
an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable
data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S.
Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market
consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and
conditions, among other things.
Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2009,
Using:
|
||||
Fair
Value at
March 31, 2009
|
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant
Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities
|
$ 58,542,439
|
$ -
|
$ 58,542,439
|
$ -
|
6
Note
3: Securities
Available
for sale securities are summarized as follows at estimated fair
value:
March
31, 2009
|
||||
Gross
|
Gross
|
Estimated
|
||
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
|
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Value
|
|
Investment
Securities:
|
||||
U.S.
government and federal agency obligation
|
$ 3,994,340
|
$ 84,184
|
$ -
|
$ 4,078,524
|
Obligations
of state and political subdivisions
|
12,139,138
|
91,609
|
(195,045)
|
12,035,702
|
Other
securities
|
1,511,521
|
-
|
(1,248,059)
|
263,462
|
FHLMC
preferred stock
|
-
|
8,400
|
-
|
8,400
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
41,088,788
|
1,076,678
|
(9,115)
|
42,156,351
|
Total
investments and mortgage-backed securities
|
$ 58,733,787
|
$ 1,260,871
|
$ (1,452,219)
|
$ 58,542,439
|
June
30, 2008
|
||||
Gross
|
Gross
|
Estimated
|
||
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
|
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Value
|
|
Investment
Securities:
|
||||
U.S.
government and federal agency obligation
|
$ 3,992,999
|
$ 52,103
|
$ (25,660)
|
$ 4,019,442
|
Obligations
of state and political subdivisions
|
6,299,763
|
7,195
|
(276,075)
|
6,030,883
|
Other
securities
|
1,889,424
|
-
|
(325,979)
|
1,563,445
|
FHLMC
preferred stock
|
304,125
|
-
|
(8,925)
|
295,200
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
28,423,717
|
63,754
|
(481,161)
|
28,006,310
|
Total
investments and mortgage-backed securities
|
$ 40,910,028
|
$ 123,052
|
$ (1,117,800)
|
$ 39,915,280
|
The
following table shows our investments’ gross unrealized losses and fair value,
aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities
have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at March 31,
2009.
Less than 12 months
|
More than 12 months
|
Totals
|
||||
Estimated
Fair Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
Investment
Securities:
|
||||||
U.S.
government and
federal
agency obligations
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
Obligations
of state and
political
subdivisions
|
4,549,110
|
(138,776)
|
1,489,708
|
(56,269)
|
6,038,818
|
(195,045)
|
Other
securities
|
-
|
-
|
263,462
|
(1,248,059)
|
263,462
|
(1,248,059)
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
62,991
|
(165)
|
443,770
|
(8,950)
|
506,761
|
(9,115)
|
Total
investments and
mortgage-backed
securities
|
$ 4,612,101
|
$ (138,941)
|
$ 2,196,940
|
$ (1,313,278)
|
$ 6,809,041
|
$ (1,452,219)
|
The
following table shows our investments’ gross unrealized losses and fair value,
aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities
have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30,
2008.
Less than 12 months
|
More than 12 months
|
Totals
|
||||
Estimated
Fair Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
Investment
Securities:
|
||||||
U.S.
government and
federal
agency obligations
|
$ 1,971,482
|
$ (25,660)
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
$ 1,971,482
|
$ (25,660)
|
Obligations
of state and
political
subdivisions
|
5,117,601
|
(276,075)
|
-
|
-
|
5,117,601
|
(276,075)
|
Other
securities
|
1,858,645
|
(334,904)
|
-
|
-
|
1,858,645
|
(334,904)
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
21,382,034
|
(449,610)
|
1,407,530
|
(31,551)
|
22,789,564
|
(481,161)
|
Total
investments and
mortgage-backed
securities
|
$ 30,329,762
|
$ (1,086,249)
|
$ 1,407,530
|
$ (31,551)
|
$ 31,737,292
|
$ (1,117,800)
|
Except as
discussed below, management believes the declines in fair value for these
securities to be temporary.
At March
31, 2009, “other securities” included investments in four pooled trust preferred
securities with a fair value of $263,000, and unrealized losses of $1.2 million
in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or more.
7
Three of
the pooled trust preferred securities, with an amortized cost of $1.4 million
and an unrealized loss of $1.1 million, showed unrealized losses primarily due
to the long-term nature of pooled trust preferred securities, a lack of demand
or inactive market for these securities, and concern regarding the underlying
financial institutions that have issued the pooled trust preferred
securities. Collateral and cash flow analysis of these securities
show that at this time it is probable the Company will receive all contractual
principal and interest with no material change in the interest payment
schedule. Because the Company does not intend to sell these
securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be maturity,
the Company does not consider the investments in the securities to be
other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009.
A fourth
pooled trust preferred security, with an amortized cost of $125,000, and an
unrealized loss of $118,000, was deemed other-than-temporarily impaired in the
Company’s second quarter of fiscal 2009. Based on an estimated
discounted cash flow valuation of the security, the Company recorded an
impairment charge of $375,000 for the unrealized loss on the
security. The loss established a new, lower amortized cost basis for
the security and reduced non-interest income for the Company’s second quarter
and the nine months ended March 31, 2009. Because the Company does
not intend to sell the security and it is not more-likely-than-not that the
Company will be required to sell this security before recovery of its new, lower
amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider the
remainder of the investment in the security to be other-than-temporarily
impaired at March 31, 2009.
The
Company’s investments in Freddie Mac Preferred Stock with an amortized cost of
$0 and unrealized gains of $8,000 was deemed other-than-temporarily impaired in
the Company’s first quarter of fiscal 2009, based on quoted market prices which
reflected market participants’ expectations regarding the likelihood of recovery
of their investment. Accordingly, the Company recorded an impairment
charge for the full amortized cost of the security, $304,000. The
loss established the amortized cost basis for the security at $0, and reduced
non-interest income for the Company’s first quarter and the nine months ended
March 31, 2009.
Note
4: Loans
Loans are
summarized as follows:
March
31,
|
June
30,
|
|
2009
|
2008
|
|
Real
Estate Loans:
|
||
Conventional
|
$ 152,051,650
|
$ 149,340,248
|
Construction
|
14,954,371
|
13,945,027
|
Commercial
|
93,853,922
|
85,859,482
|
Consumer
loans
|
22,733,042
|
21,524,166
|
Commercial
loans
|
83,731,710
|
81,574,995
|
367,324,695
|
352,243,918
|
|
Loans
in process
|
(4,695,026)
|
(5,667,898)
|
Deferred
loan fees, net
|
89,737
|
60,958
|
Allowance
for loan losses
|
(4,282,711)
|
(3,567,203)
|
Total
loans
|
$ 358,436,695
|
$ 343,069,775
|
Note
5: Deposits
Deposits
are summarized as follows:
March
31,
|
June
30,
|
|
2009
|
2008
|
|
Non-interest
bearing accounts
|
$ 22,138,296
|
$ 19,220,977
|
NOW
accounts
|
60,479,731
|
37,150,005
|
Money
market deposit accounts
|
6,025,291
|
12,104,527
|
Savings
accounts
|
61,587,214
|
73,423,195
|
Certificates
|
156,468,015
|
150,358,341
|
Total
deposits
|
$ 306,698,547
|
$ 292,257,045
|
8
Note
6: Comprehensive
Income
The
Company’s comprehensive income for the three- and nine-month periods ended March
31, 2009, was as follows:
Three
months ended
|
Nine
months ended
|
|||
March
31,
|
March
31,
|
|||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|
Net
income
|
$ 983,935
|
$ 898,111
|
$ 2,798,397
|
$ 2,584,162
|
Other
comprehensive income:
|
||||
Unrealized
gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale
|
391,073
|
195,802
|
124,257
|
876,484
|
Less,
realized (losses) gains included in income
|
-
|
-
|
(678,973)
|
6,084
|
Tax
benefit (expense)
|
(144,761)
|
(72,447)
|
(297,259)
|
(324,299)
|
Total
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
246,312
|
123,355
|
505,971
|
546,101
|
Comprehensive
income
|
$ 1,230,247
|
$ 1,021,466
|
$ 3,304,368
|
$ 3,130,263
|
Note
6: Earnings
Per Share
Basic and
diluted earnings per share are based upon the weighted-average shares
outstanding. The following table summarizes basic and diluted
earnings per common share for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31,
2009 and 2008.
Three
months ended
|
Nine
months ended
|
|||
March
31,
|
March
31,
|
|||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|
Net
income
|
$ 983,935
|
$ 898,111
|
$ 2,798,397
|
$ 2,584,162
|
Dividend
payable on preferred stock
|
119,375
|
-
|
153,861
|
-
|
Net
income available to common shareholders
|
$ 864,560
|
$ 898,111
|
$ 2,644,536
|
$ 2,584,162
|
Average
Common shares – outstanding basic
|
2,082,627
|
2,212,961
|
2,136,583
|
2,194,069
|
Stock
options under treasury stock method
|
440
|
10,716
|
806
|
9,703
|
Average
Common share – outstanding diluted
|
2,083,067
|
2,223,677
|
2,137,389
|
2,203,772
|
Basic
net income available to common shareholders
|
$ 0.42
|
$ 0.41
|
$ 1.24
|
$ 1.18
|
Diluted
net income available to common shareholders
|
$ 0.42
|
$ 0.40
|
$ 1.24
|
$ 1.17
|
The
Company had 189,826 and 65,500 stock options and warrants outstanding at March
31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, with a grant price exceeding the market
price. These stock options and warrants were excluded from the above
calculation as they were anti-dilutive.
Note
7: Stock
Option Plans
Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based
Payment,” requires that compensation costs related to share-based payment
transactions be recognized in financial statements. With limited
exceptions, the amount of compensation cost is measured based on the grant-date
fair value of the equity instruments issued. Compensation cost is
recognized over the vesting period during which an employee provides service in
exchange for the award.
Note
8: Employee
Stock Ownership Plan
The Bank
established a tax-qualified ESOP in April 1994. The plan covers substantially
all employees who have attained the age of 21 and completed one year of
service. The Company’s intent is to continue the ESOP for fiscal
2009. The Company has been accruing $53,000 per quarter for ESOP
benefit expenses during this fiscal year and has contributed cash to the plan to
allow the purchase of shares for allocation to participants.
Note
9: Corporate Obligated Floating
Rate Trust Preferred Securities
Southern
Missouri Statutory Trust I issued $7.0 million of Floating Rate Capital
Securities (the “Trust Preferred Securities”) in March, 2004, with a liquidation
value of $1,000 per share. The securities are due in 30 years, are
now redeemable, and bear interest at a floating rate based on
LIBOR. The securities represent undivided beneficial interests in the
trust, which was established by the Company for the purpose of issuing the
securities. The Trust Preferred Securities were sold in a private
transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the “Act”) and have not been registered under the Act. The
securities may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration
or an applicable exemption from registration requirements.
9
Southern
Missouri Statutory Trust I used the proceeds from the sale of the Trust
Preferred Securities to purchase Junior Subordinated Debentures of the
Company. The Company has used its net proceeds for working capital
and investment in its subsidiary.
Note 10:
Capital Purchase
Program Implemented by the U.S. Treasury
In
December 2008, the Company received $9.6 million from the U.S. Treasury through
the sale of 9,550 shares of the Company’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual
Preferred Stock, Series A, as part of the Treasury’s Capital Purchase
Program. The Company also issued to the U.S. Treasury a warrant to
purchase 114,326 shares of common stock at $12.53 per share. The
amount of preferred shares sold represented approximately 3% of the Company’s
risk-weighted assets as of September 30, 2008.
The
transaction was part of the Treasury’s program to infuse capital into the
nation’s healthiest and strongest banks for the purpose of stabilizing the US
financial system and promoting economic activity. The Company elected
to participate in the program given the uncertain economic outlook, the
relatively attractive cost of capital compared to the current market, and the
strategic opportunities the Company foresees regarding potential uses of the
capital. The additional capital increased the Company’s already
well-capitalized position. The Company used the proceeds of the issue
for working capital and investment in its banking subsidiary.
The
preferred shares pay a cumulative dividend of 5% per year for the first five
years and 9% per year thereafter. The preferred shares are callable
after three years at 100% of the issue price, subject to the approval of the
Company’s federal regulator. Earlier redemptions of the preferred
shares also require that the Company complete an offering of at least
$2,387,500.
Note
11: Authorized Share Repurchase
Program
On
October 22, 2008, the Board of Directors authorized and the Company announced
the open-market or privately-negotiated stock repurchase of up to 110,000 shares
of the Company’s outstanding stock. The repurchase program was
completed November 19, 2008. As of March 31, 2009, the number of
shares held as treasury stock was 869,250. Outside of purchases
necessary for funding of benefit plans, the Company expects no significant
repurchase activity in the near term, due to its participation in the US
Treasury Department’s Capital Purchase Program, which generally precludes
repurchase activity.
Note
12: New
Accounting Pronouncements
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement
No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”), which defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally
accepted accounting standards, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 was effective for the Company for the fiscal
year which began July 1, 2008. In March 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No.
FAS 157-2 (“FSP No. 157-2”), which delays the effective date of SFAS
No. 157 for non-financial assets and liabilities, except for items that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring
basis (at least annually), to fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008. Adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact
on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In
September 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue 06-4, “Accounting
for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement
Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements,” was ratified. This EITF Issue
addresses accounting for separate agreements which split life insurance policy
benefits between an employer and employee. The Issue requires the employer to
recognize a liability for future benefits payable to the employee under these
agreements. The effects of applying this Issue must be recognized through either
a change in accounting principle through an adjustment to equity or through the
retrospective application to all prior periods. The Issue was effective for the
fiscal year which began July 1, 2008, and did not have a material impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements..
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115” (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 provides
companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at
estimated fair value. Most of the provisions of SFAS No. 159 are elective;
however, the amendment to SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments
in Debt and Equity Securities, applies to all entities that own trading and
available-for-sale securities. The fair value option created by SFAS
No. 159 permits an entity to measure eligible items at fair value as of
specified election dates. The fair value option (a) may generally be
applied instrument by instrument, (b) is irrevocable unless a new election
date occurs, and (c) must be applied to the entire instrument and not to
only a portion of the instrument. SFAS No. 159 was effective for the
Company for the fiscal year which began July 1, 2008, and did not have a
material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
10
In March
2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities—An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”
(“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced qualitative disclosures about
objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about
fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and
disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative
agreements. SFAS No. 161 was effective for the Company for the interim period
which began January 1, 2009, and did not have a significant effect on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In
October 2008, the FASB issued the FASB Staff Position on FAS 157-3, “Determining
the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not
Active” (“FSP 157-3”). FSP 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS
No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” in a market that is not active and provides
an example to illustrate key considerations in determining fair value of
financial assets when the market for that financial asset is not
active. FSP 157-3 applies to financial assets within the scope
of accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements in
accordance with FAS 157. FSP 157-3 was effective upon issuance and
included prior periods for which financial statements had not been
issued. The application of FSP 157-3 did not have a material impact
on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Note
13: New
Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Effective
In
December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business
Combinations—A Replacement of FASB Statement No. 141” (“SFAS No. 141(R)”)
and Statement No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements—An Amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No. 141(R)
establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and
measures certain items in a business combination, as well as disclosures about
the nature and financial effects of a business combination. SFAS No. 160
establishes accounting and reporting standards surrounding noncontrolling
interest, or minority interests, which are the portions of equity in a
subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. The
pronouncements are effective for fiscal years beginning on or after
December 15, 2008 and apply prospectively to business combinations, meaning
they are effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2009. Presentation and
disclosure requirements related to noncontrolling interests must be
retrospectively applied. Management is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS
No. 141(R) on its accounting for future acquisitions; management has evaluated
the requirements of SFAS No. 160 and believes it will not have a material effect
on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In April
2009, the FASB issued the FASB Staff Position on FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair
Value When the Volume and Level of Activity For the Asset or Liability Have
Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly” (FSP
157-4). FSP 157-4 provides additional guidance for estimating fair
value in accordance with SFAS 157 when the volume and level of activity for the
asset or liability have decreased significantly. FSP 157-4 also
provides guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is
not orderly. The provisions of FSP 157-4 will be effective for the
Company’s year ended June 30, 2009. Management is currently
evaluating the impact of FSP 157-4, and believes implementation will not have a
material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In April
2009, the FASB issued the FASB Staff Position on FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments” (the FSP). The FSP
establishes a methodology of determining and recording other-than-temporary
impairments of debt securities and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. The provisions of the FSP will be effective for the
Company’s year ended June 30, 2009. Management is currently
evaluating the impact of the FSP.
In April
2009, the FASB issued the FASB Staff Position on FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1,
“Interim Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (the
FSP). The FSP requires disclosures about fair value of financial
instruments in interim reporting periods of publicly-traded companies that were
previously only required to be disclosed in annual financial
statements. The provisions of the FSP are effective for the Company
for the interim period ended September 30, 2009, and, as the FSP amends only the
disclosure requirements about fair value of financial instruments in interim
periods, adoption is not expected to affect the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
Note
14: Subsequent
Events
On April
16, 2009, the Company announced the signing of a definitive agreement with
Southern Bank of Commerce (SBOC), a troubled financial institution headquartered
in Paragould, Arkansas, whereby SBOC will be acquired by the Company and merged
into Southern Missouri Bank and Trust Co. The definitive agreement
calls for payment of $600,000 in cash, of which $200,000 will be held in escrow
subject to resolution of certain matters, in exchange for all outstanding stock
in SBOC. Additional funds may be paid to SBOC shareholders upon the
realization by the Company of funds, in excess of the $200,000 discussed above,
related to certain tax matters or upon the sale of the bank charter held by
SBOC. As of March 31, 2009, SBOC had total assets of $30.5 million,
net loans of $16.6 million, deposits of $28.3 million, and stockholder’s equity
of $1.3 million. SBOC had 3.8 million shares of common stock
outstanding. We expect the transaction to close in the fourth quarter
of the Company’s 2009 fiscal year, or in the first quarter of the 2010 fiscal
year, subject to approval by SBOC shareholders and federal and state banking
regulators.
11
PART I: Item
2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
SOUTHERN
MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
General
Southern
Missouri Bancorp, Inc. (Southern Missouri or Company) is a Missouri corporation
and owns all of the outstanding stock of Southern Missouri Bank & Trust Co.
(SMBT or the Bank). The Company’s earnings are primarily dependent on
the operations of the Bank. As a result, the following discussion
relates primarily to the operations of the Bank. The Bank’s deposit
accounts are generally insured up to a maximum of $100,000 (certain retirement
accounts are insured up to $250,000) by the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF), which
is administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC). Currently, a temporary increase in the Standard Maximum
Deposit Insurance Amount, to $250,000, is in effect through December 31,
2009. The Bank currently conducts its business through its home
office located in Poplar Bluff and nine full service branch facilities in Poplar
Bluff (2), Van Buren, Dexter, Kennett, Doniphan, Sikeston, Matthews, and Qulin,
Missouri.
The
significant accounting policies followed by Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. and
its wholly-owned subsidiary for interim financial reporting are consistent with
the accounting policies followed for annual financial reporting. All
adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature and are in the opinion of
management necessary for a fair statement of the results for the periods
reported, have been included in the accompanying consolidated condensed
financial statements.
The
consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of June 30, 2008, has been derived
from the audited consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of that
date. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in
the Company’s annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been
condensed or omitted. These consolidated financial statements should
be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K annual report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Management’s
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is
intended to assist in understanding the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. The information contained in this section
should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes. The following discussion reviews
the Company’s consolidated financial condition at March 31, 2009, and the
results of operations for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively.
Forward Looking
Statements
This
document, including information incorporated by reference, contains
forward-looking statements about the Company and its subsidiaries which we
believe are within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995. These forward-looking statements may include, without
limitation, statements with respect to anticipated future operating and
financial performance, growth opportunities, interest rates, cost savings and
funding advantages expected or anticipated to be realized by
management. Words such as “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,”
“believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan” and similar
expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements by the Company and its
management are based on beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations,
anticipations, estimates and intentions of management and are not guarantees of
future performance. The important factors we discuss below, as well
as other factors discussed under the caption “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and identified in our
filings with the SEC and those presented elsewhere by our management from time
to time, could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by
the forward-looking statements made in this document:
·
|
the
strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the
local economies in which we conduct
operations;
|
·
|
the
strength of the real estate market in the local economies in which we
conduct operations;
|
·
|
the
effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws,
including interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve
Board;
|
·
|
inflation,
interest rate, market and monetary
fluctuations;
|
·
|
the
timely development of and acceptance of our new products and services and
the perceived overall value of these products and services by users,
including the features, pricing and quality compared to competitors'
products and services;
|
·
|
the
willingness of users to substitute our products and services for products
and services of our competitors;
|
·
|
the
impact of changes in financial services' laws and regulations (including
laws concerning taxes, banking, securities and
insurance);
|
·
|
the
impact of technological changes;
|
12
·
|
acquisitions;
|
·
|
changes
in consumer spending and saving habits;
and
|
·
|
our
success at managing the risks involved in the
foregoing.
|
The
Company disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking
statements based on the occurrence of future events, the receipt of new
information, or otherwise.
Critical Accounting
Policies
Generally
accepted accounting principles are complex and require management to apply
significant judgments to various accounting, reporting and disclosure
matters. Management of the Company must use assumptions and estimates
to apply these principles where actual measurement is not possible or
practical. For a complete discussion of the Company’s significant
accounting policies, see “Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements” in the
Company’s 2008 Annual Report. Certain policies are considered
critical because they are highly dependent upon subjective or complex judgments,
assumptions and estimates. Changes in such estimates may have a
significant impact on the financial statements. Management has
reviewed the application of these policies with the Audit Committee of the
Company’s Board of Directors. For a discussion of applying critical
accounting policies, see “Critical Accounting Policies” beginning on page 11 in
the Company’s 2008 Annual Report.
Executive
Summary
Our
results of operations depend primarily on our net interest margin, which is
directly impacted by the interest rate environment. The net interest
margin represents interest income earned on interest-earning assets (primarily
mortgage loans, commercial loans and the investment portfolio), less interest
expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities (primarily certificates of deposit,
savings, interest-bearing demand accounts and borrowed funds), as a percentage
of average interest-earning assets. Net interest margin is directly
impacted by the spread between long-term interest rates and short-term interest
rates, as our interest-earning assets, particularly those with initial terms to
maturity or repricing greater than one year, generally price off longer term
rates while our interest-bearing liabilities generally price off shorter term
interest rates.
Our net interest income is also impacted
by the shape of the market yield curve. A steep yield curve – in
which the difference in interest rates between short term and long term periods
is relatively large – could be beneficial to our net interest income, as the
interest rate spread between our additional interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities would be larger. Conversely, a flat or
flattening yield curve, in which the difference in rates between short term and
long term periods is relatively small or shrinking, or an inverted yield curve,
in which short term rates exceed long term rates, could have an adverse impact
on our net interest income, as our interest rate spread could
decrease.
Our
results of operations may also be affected significantly by general and local
economic and competitive conditions, particularly those with respect to changes
in market interest rates, government policies and actions of regulatory
authorities.
During the first nine months of fiscal
2009, we grew our balance sheet by $37.8 million; this growth was partially due
to the leveraged use of $9.6 million in preferred capital invested by the U.S.
Treasury Department under the terms of their Capital Purchase Program. Growth
reflected an $18.6 million increase in available-for-sale investments, a
$15.4 million increase in total net loans, a $14.4 million increase in
deposits, an $8.5 million increase in advances from
the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), and a $4.4 million increase in securities
sold under agreements to repurchase. The growth in available-for-sale
investments was primarily in the form of collateralized mortgage obligations
(CMOs) and municipal bonds. The growth in loans was primarily due to
commercial real estate, residential real estate, and commercial loan
growth. Deposit growth was primarily in interest-bearing
checking and certificates
of deposit, partially
offset by decreases in money market passbook savings and money market deposit
accounts.
In
December 2008, the Company announced its participation in the U.S. Treasury
Department’s Capital Purchase Program (CPP), which is one component of its
Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). The Treasury invested $9.6
million in perpetual preferred stock carrying a dividend of 5% for the first
five years, increasing to 9% thereafter. The Treasury Department
created the CPP with the intention of building capital at healthy U.S. financial
institutions in order to increase the flow of financing to U.S. businesses and
consumers, and to support the U.S. economy. As of March 31, 2009, the
Company has increased loan balances by $15.4 million in the current fiscal year,
and by $28.5 million over the last twelve months. Additionally, the
Company has contributed to the accomplishment of Treasury’s objective by
leveraging the investment to support the purchase of $15.1 million in
agency-backed collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) and $5.6 million in
municipal debt, helping to improve the availability of credit in two distressed
markets. The majority of these securities purchases would not likely
have been made by the Company, absent the Treasury
investment. Including both securities and direct loans, the Company
has increased its investment in credit markets by $44.7 million over the last
twelve months.
13
In
addition, on April 16, 2009, the Company announced the signing of a definitive
agreement with Southern Bank of Commerce, a troubled financial institution
headquartered in Paragould, Arkansas, whereby Southern Bank of Commerce will be
acquired by the Company and merged into Southern Missouri Bank and Trust
Co. As of March 31, 2009, Southern Bank of Commerce had total assets
of $30.5 million and deposits of $29.1 million. The Company
anticipated, at the time it applied for the CPP funding, that some troubled
institutions would likely become available given the current state of the
economy and the banking system. The Company also believed that it
could assist Treasury in meeting its goals by helping to make credit available
in communities in which such institutions are located. From December
31, 2006, through December 31, 2008, gross loans at Southern Bank of Commerce
fell by 32.9%. The Company anticipates reversing that decline, which
will assist in the accomplishment of Treasury’s stated goals for the
CPP.
Net income for the third quarter of fiscal 2009 increased
9.6% to $984,000, as compared to $898,000 earned during the same period of
the prior year. After accounting for preferred stock
dividends of $119,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2009, net earnings
available to common shareholders decreased 3.7%, to
$865,000. The increase in net income
compared to the year-ago period was primarily due to a 16.2% increase in net
interest income, partially offset by a 17.8% increase in noninterest expense and
a 17.1% increase in provisions for loan losses. Diluted earnings per
common share for the third quarter
of fiscal 2009 were $0.42,
as compared to $0.40 for
the third quarter of fiscal 2008. For
the first nine months of
fiscal 2009, net income
increased 8.3% to $2.8 million, as compared to $2.6 million earned during the same period
of the prior year. After accounting for
preferred stock dividends of $154,000, net earnings available to common
shareholders increased 2.3%, to $2.6 million. The increase in net income
compared to the year-ago period was primarily due to a 23.7% increase in net interest income,
partially offset by a 35.3% decrease in non-interest income – the
result of charges to record the other-than-temporary impairment of Company
investments – an 83.6% increase in loan loss provisions, and a
12.3% increase in non-interest
expense. For both the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2009, our increase in
net interest income was due primarily to an increase in average interest-earning assets, as well as an
increase in net interest
rate spread.
Short-term market rates fell
substantially during the first nine months of fiscal 2009, following an
already substantial decline over the prior fiscal year. In December 2008, the Federal Reserve cut the targeted
Federal Funds rate to a
range of 0.00% to 0.25%,
and in March 2009, detailed its plan to purchase long-term mortgage-backed
securities, agency debt, and long-term Treasuries. From July 1,
2008, to March 31, 2009, the six-month treasury bill rate declined 174 basis
points (to yield 0.43%); the two-year treasury note declined 182 basis points
(to yield 0.81%); and the ten-year treasury bond declined 128 basis points (to
yield 2.71%). Notable volatility in the first six months of the
Company’s fiscal year gave way to more stability in the financial markets in the
most recent quarter. The curve remained generally quite steep by
recent historical comparisons, which is generally to the Company’s
benefit. In this rate environment, our net interest margin increased
30 basis points when comparing the first nine months of fiscal 2009 to the same
period of the prior year.
The Company’s net income is also
affected by the level of
its non-interest income and
operating expenses. Non-interest income consists primarily of service
charges, ATM and loan fees, and other general operating
income. Operating expenses consist primarily of salaries and employee
benefits, occupancy-related expenses, postage, insurance, advertising,
professional fees, office expenses, and other general operating expenses. During the
nine-month period ended March 31, 2009, non-interest income decreased 35.3%
compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year, primarily due to charges
incurred to recognize the other-than-temporary impairment of Company
investments. Excluding those charges, non-interest income
would have increased 2.6%, attributable to increased debit card activity and
secondary market loan sale income. Non-interest expense increased for
the nine-month period ended March 31, 2009, by 12.3%, compared to the same
period of the prior fiscal
year, primarily in the categories of compensation and benefits and deposit
insurance assessments.
Our charges incurred to recognize the
other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) of available-for-sale investments related
to investments in Freddie Mac preferred stock ($304,000 loss realized in the
first quarter of fiscal 2009) and a pooled trust preferred collateralized debt
obligation, Trapeza CDO IV,
Ltd., class C2 ($375,000
loss realized in the second quarter of fiscal 2009). The Company
currently holds three additional collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) which
have not been deemed other-than-temporarily impaired, based on the Company’s
best judgment using information currently available. All of these
investments are described in the table below:
Unrealized
|
Estimated
|
S&P
|
Moody’s
|
||
Security
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Gains
/ (Losses)
|
Fair
Value
|
Rating
|
Rating
|
Freddie
Mac Preferred Stock Series Z
|
$ -
|
$ 8,400
|
$ 8,400
|
C
|
Ca
|
Trapeza
CDO IV, Ltd., class C2
|
125,000
|
(118,025)
|
6,975
|
NR
|
Ca
|
Trapeza
CDO XIII, Ltd., class A2A
|
476,847
|
(372,497)
|
104,350
|
BB-
|
Baa2
|
Trapeza
CDO XIII, Ltd., class B
|
477,596
|
(409,346)
|
68,250
|
NR
|
B3
|
Preferred
Term Securities XXIV, Ltd., class B1
|
432,078
|
(348,191)
|
83,887
|
NR
|
B2
|
Totals
|
$ 1,511,521
|
$ (1,239,659)
|
$ 271,862
|
14
The
Company determined the amount of OTTI charges to record on the Freddie Mac
Preferred Stock based on quoted market prices, and on the Trapeza IV CDO based
on the estimated present value of expected cash flows on the instruments,
discounted using a current market rate on such securities. The
Trapeza IV CDO is receiving principal in kind (PIK), in lieu of cash interest
payments, and is treated by the Company as a non-accrual asset. For
the Trapeza XIII CDOs and the Preferred Term Securities pooled trust preferred
investments, the Company expects to receive principal and interest in full
without a material change in the scheduled interest payments, based on a review
of the terms of the obligation and the financial strength of the underlying
firms.
We expect
to continue to grow our assets modestly through the origination and occasional
purchase of loans, and purchases of investment securities. The
primary funding for our asset growth is expected to come from retail deposits,
short- and long-term FHLB borrowings, and, as needed, brokered certificates of
deposit. We intend to grow deposits by offering desirable deposit
products for our existing customers and by attracting new depository
relationships. We will continue to explore branch expansion
opportunities in market areas that we believe present attractive opportunities
for our strategic business model.
Comparison of Financial
Condition at March 31, 2009, and June 30, 2008
The
Company’s total assets increased by $37.8 million, or 9.0%, to $455.6 million at
March 31, 2009, as compared to $417.8 million at June 30,
2008. Available-for-sale investment balances increased by $18.6
million, or 46.7%, to $58.5 million, as compared to $39.9 million at June 30,
2008. This growth was attributed to the Company’s leveraged use of
the investment by the U.S. Treasury Department of $9.6 million under its Capital
Purchase Program. Loans, net of the allowance for loan losses,
increased $15.4 million, or 4.5%, to $358.4 million at March 31, 2009, as
compared to $343.1 million at June 30, 2008. Commercial real estate
loan balances grew by $8.0 million, while commercial loans were up $2.2 million,
as the Company continues to focus on developing this
business. Residential real estate loans were up $2.7
million.
Asset
growth during the first nine months of fiscal 2009 has been funded primarily
with deposit growth, which totaled $14.4 million, or 4.9%, bringing deposit
balances to $306.7 million at March 31, 2009, as compared to $292.3 million at
June 30, 2008. The increase in deposits was due primarily to a $23.3
million increase in interest-bearing checking accounts, a $2.9 million increase
in non-interest checking accounts, and a $6.1 million increase in certificates
of deposit, partially offset by a $15.3 million decrease in combined money
market passbook savings and money market deposit accounts, and a $2.7 million
decrease in statement savings accounts. Included in those figures is
a decrease in public unit funds of $13.4 million, and an increase in brokered
CDs of $4.2 million, meaning that retail, non-brokered deposits were up $23.7
million since June 30, 2008. The Company attributes strong deposit growth to
introduction of its new “rewards checking” product, which provides the depositor
an above-market yield on their checking account when the customer meets certain
conditions such as debit card use and receipt of electronic monthly
statements. Deposit outflows from money market passbook savings,
money market deposit accounts, and statement savings accounts are attributed to
scheduled withdrawals of public unit funds, and customer preference for products
offering higher yields, including our own reward checking and certificate of
deposit products. The Company also used FHLB advances, which
increased $8.5 million, or 13.2%, to $72.5 million at March 31, 2009, as
compared to $64.1 million at June 30, 2008. Securities sold under
agreements to repurchase totaled $26.2 million at March 31, 2009, an increase of
$4.4 million, or 20.3%, compared to $21.8 million at June 30, 2008.
Total
stockholders’ equity increased $10.7 million, or 35.0%, to $41.1 million at
March 31, 2009, as compared to $30.5 million at June 30, 2008. The
increase was primarily due to the $9.6 million investment in preferred equity by
the U.S. Treasury Department under the terms of its Capital Purchase
Program. Additionally, capital increased due to retention of net
income, an increase in the market value of the Company’s available-for-sale
investment portfolio, and the exercise of stock options outstanding, partially
offset by stock repurchases and cash dividends paid on both common and preferred
shares.
Average Balance Sheet for
the Three- and Nine-Month Periods Ended March 31, 2009 and
2008
The
tables on the following pages present certain information regarding Southern
Missouri Bancorp, Inc.’s financial condition and net interest income for the
three- and nine-month periods ending March 31, 2009 and 2008. The
tables present the annualized average yield on interest-earning assets and the
annualized average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. We derived
the yields and costs by dividing annualized income or expense by the average
balance of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities,
respectively, for the periods shown. Yields on tax-exempt obligations
were not computed on a tax equivalent basis.
15
Three-month
period ended
March
31, 2009
|
Three-month
period ended
March
31, 2008
|
|||||
Average
Balance
|
Interest
and Dividends
|
Yield/
Cost
(%)
|
Average
Balance
|
Interest
and Dividends
|
Yield/
Cost
(%)
|
|
Interest
earning assets:
|
||||||
Mortgage
loans (1)
|
$ 258,159,170
|
$ 4,222,271
|
6.54
|
$ 227,601,634
|
$ 4,201,486
|
7.38
|
Other
loans (1)
|
98,675,653
|
1,391,031
|
5.64
|
97,041,925
|
1,555,271
|
6.41
|
Total
net loans
|
356,834,823
|
5,613,302
|
6.29
|
324,643,559
|
5,756,757
|
7.09
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
42,085,918
|
510,534
|
4.85
|
23,509,298
|
294,284
|
5.01
|
Investment
securities (2)
|
22,263,967
|
163,294
|
2.93
|
21,849,724
|
298,506
|
5.46
|
Other
interest earning assets
|
5,014,033
|
2,769
|
0.22
|
8,002,491
|
36,137
|
1.81
|
Total
interest earning assets (1)
|
426,198,741
|
6,289,899
|
5.90
|
378,005,072
|
6,385,684
|
6.76
|
Other
noninterest earning assets (3)
|
25,427,883
|
-
|
21,910,487
|
-
|
||
Total
assets
|
$ 451,626,624
|
$ 6,289,899
|
$ 399,915,559
|
$ 6,385,684
|
||
Interest
bearing liabilities:
|
||||||
Savings
accounts
|
$ 62,385,720
|
$ 228,037
|
1.46
|
$ 76,063,709
|
$ 551,764
|
2.90
|
NOW
accounts
|
54,368,002
|
302,079
|
2.22
|
33,218,035
|
107,591
|
1.30
|
Money
market deposit accounts
|
6,111,761
|
19,398
|
1.27
|
5,882,984
|
26,654
|
1.81
|
Certificates
of deposit
|
151,788,816
|
1,187,026
|
3.13
|
144,823,148
|
1,587,492
|
4.38
|
Total
interest bearing deposits
|
274,654,299
|
1,736,540
|
2.53
|
259,987,876
|
2,273,501
|
3.50
|
Borrowings:
|
||||||
Securities
sold under agreements
to
repurchase
|
26,861,704
|
44,959
|
0.67
|
24,877,685
|
183,894
|
2.96
|
FHLB
advances
|
77,071,667
|
851,239
|
4.42
|
55,507,418
|
717,801
|
5.17
|
Subordinated
debt
|
7,217,000
|
81,708
|
4.53
|
7,217,000
|
134,625
|
7.46
|
Total
interest bearing liabilities
|
385,804,670
|
2,714,446
|
2.81
|
347,589,979
|
3,309,821
|
3.81
|
Noninterest
bearing demand deposits
|
23,909,363
|
-
|
19,687,209
|
-
|
||
Other
noninterest bearing liabilities
|
1,057,053
|
-
|
2,230,731
|
-
|
||
Total
liabilities
|
410,771,086
|
2,714,446
|
369,507,919
|
3,309,821
|
||
Stockholders’
equity
|
40,855,538
|
-
|
30,407,640
|
-
|
||
Total
liabilities and
stockholders'
equity
|
$ 451,626,624
|
$ 2,714,446
|
$ 399,915,559
|
$ 3,309,821
|
||
Net
interest income
|
$ 3,575,453
|
$ 3,075,863
|
||||
Interest
rate spread (4)
|
3.09
|
2.95
|
||||
Net
interest margin (5)
|
3.36
|
3.25
|
||||
Ratio
of average interest-earning assets
to
average interest-bearing liabilities
|
110.47%
|
108.75%
|
(1) | Calculated net of deferred loan fees, loan discounts and loans-in-process. Non-accrual loans are included in average loans. |
(2) | Includes FHLB stock and related cash dividends. |
(3)
|
Includes
average balances for fixed assets and BOLI of $8.2 million and $7.5
million, respectively, for the three-month period ending March 31, 2009,
as compared to $8.3 million and $7.2 million for the same period of the
prior year.
|
(4)
|
Interest
rate spread represents the difference between the average rate on
interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing
liabilities.
|
(5)
|
Net
interest margin represents net interest income divided by average
interest-earning assets
|
16
Nine-month
period ended
March
31, 2009
|
Nine-month
period ended
March
31, 2008
|
|||||
Average
Balance
|
Interest
and Dividends
|
Yield/
Cost
(%)
|
Average
Balance
|
Interest
and Dividends
|
Yield/
Cost
(%)
|
|
Interest
earning assets:
|
||||||
Mortgage
loans (1)
|
$ 251,544,704
|
$ 12,576,002
|
6.67
|
$ 228,684,296
|
$ 12,394,476
|
7.23
|
Other
loans (1)
|
102,057,792
|
4,560,931
|
5.96
|
91,470,307
|
5,193,130
|
7.57
|
Total
net loans
|
353,602,496
|
17,136,933
|
6.46
|
320,154,603
|
17,587,606
|
7.32
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
34,235,733
|
1,264,734
|
4.93
|
16,150,551
|
575,510
|
4.75
|
Investment
securities (2)
|
19,171,282
|
499,774
|
3.48
|
24,862,322
|
877,075
|
4.70
|
Other
interest earning assets
|
5,391,983
|
34,849
|
0.86
|
4,954,588
|
55,364
|
1.49
|
Total
interest earning assets (1)
|
412,401,494
|
18,936,290
|
6.12
|
366,122,064
|
19,095,555
|
6.95
|
Other
noninterest earning assets (3)
|
23,603,122
|
-
|
22,735,868
|
-
|
||
Total
assets
|
$ 436,004,616
|
$ 18,936,290
|
$ 388,857,932
|
$ 19,095,555
|
||
Interest
bearing liabilities:
|
||||||
Savings
accounts
|
$ 65,864,200
|
$ 949,297
|
1.92
|
$ 76,769,613
|
$ 2,000,155
|
3.47
|
NOW
accounts
|
44,440,022
|
624,123
|
1.87
|
31,432,785
|
318,762
|
1.35
|
Money
market deposit accounts
|
7,176,780
|
80,377
|
1.49
|
5,827,998
|
81,591
|
1.87
|
Certificates
of deposit
|
148,975,130
|
3,725,013
|
3.33
|
138,444,378
|
4,875,628
|
4.70
|
Total
interest bearing deposits
|
266,456,132
|
5,378,810
|
2.69
|
252,474,774
|
7,276,136
|
3.84
|
Borrowings:
|
||||||
Securities
sold under agreements
to
repurchase
|
24,107,020
|
186,974
|
1.03
|
19,991,918
|
583,880
|
3.89
|
FHLB
advances
|
78,933,671
|
2,598,182
|
4.39
|
57,936,191
|
2,318,263
|
5.34
|
Subordinated
debt
|
7,217,000
|
285,186
|
5.27
|
7,217,000
|
438,768
|
8.11
|
Total
interest bearing liabilities
|
376,713,823
|
8,449,152
|
2.99
|
337,619,883
|
10,617,047
|
4.19
|
Noninterest
bearing demand deposits
|
23,139,595
|
-
|
19,287,767
|
-
|
||
Other
noninterest bearing liabilities
|
1,195,206
|
-
|
2,333,157
|
-
|
||
Total
liabilities
|
401,048,624
|
8,449,152
|
359,240,807
|
10,617,047
|
||
Stockholders’
equity
|
34,955,992
|
-
|
29,617,125
|
-
|
||
Total
liabilities and
stockholders'
equity
|
$ 436,004,616
|
$ 8,449,152
|
388,857,932
|
$ 10,617,047
|
||
Net
interest income
|
$ 10,487,138
|
$ 8,478,508
|
||||
Interest
rate spread (4)
|
3.13
|
2.76
|
||||
Net
interest margin (5)
|
3.39
|
3.09
|
||||
Ratio
of average interest-earning assets
to
average interest-bearing liabilities
|
109.47%
|
108.44%
|
(1) | Calculated net of deferred loan fees, loan discounts and loans-in-process. Non-accrual loans are included in average loans. |
(2) | Includes FHLB stock and related cash dividends. |
(3)
|
Includes
average balances for fixed assets and BOLI of $8.2 million and $7.4
million, respectively, for the nine-month period ending March 31, 2009, as
compared to $8.5 million and $7.1 million for the same period of the prior
year.
|
(4)
|
Interest
rate spread represents the difference between the average rate on
interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing
liabilities.
|
(5)
|
Net
interest margin represents net interest income divided by average
interest-earning assets
|
17
Results of Operations –
Comparison of the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and
2008
General. Net income
for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2009, was $984,000 and
$2.8 million, respectively. After preferred dividends of $119,000
paid in the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, net income available to
common shareholders was $865,000, a decrease of $33,000, or 3.7%, as compared to
$898,000 earned in the same period of the prior fiscal year. After
preferred dividends of $154,000, paid in the nine-month period ended March 31,
2009, net income available to common shareholders was $2.6 million, an increase
of $60,000, or 2.3%, as compared to the $2.6 million earned in the same period
of the prior fiscal year. Basic and diluted net income available to
common shareholders was $0.42 for the third quarter and $1.24 for the first nine months of fiscal 2009, compared to
$0.41 basic and
$0.40 diluted net income available to common
shareholders for the
third quarter, and $1.18 basic and $1.17 diluted for the first nine months of fiscal 2008. Our
annualized return on average assets for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2009, was
0.87% and 0.86%, respectively, compared to
0.90% and 0.89%, respectively, for the same periods of
the prior fiscal year. Our return on average common stockholders’
equity for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2009, was 11.0% and 11.4%, respectively, compared to
11.8% and 11.6%, respectively, for the same periods of
the prior fiscal year.
Net Interest
Income. Net interest income for the three- and nine-month
periods ended March 31, 2009, was $3.6 million and $10.5 million, respectively,
increases of $500,000, or 16.2%, and $2.0 million, or 23.7%, respectively, as
compared to the same periods of the prior fiscal year. For both the
three- and nine-month periods, the increases reflected our growth initiatives,
which resulted in increases in the average balances of both interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and an expansion of our net interest
rate spread. Our interest rate spread was 3.09% and 3.13%,
respectively, for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2009, as
compared to 2.95% and 2.76%, respectively, for the same periods of the prior
fiscal year. For the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31,
2009, our net interest margin, determined by dividing the annualized net
interest income by total average interest-earning assets, was 3.36% and 3.39%,
respectively, compared to 3.25% and 3.09%, respectively, for the same periods of
the prior fiscal year. The
increase in interest rate spread for the three-month period resulted from a
100 basis point decrease in
the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities, partially offset by
an 86 basis point decrease in the average
yield on interest-earning assets. For the nine-month period, the increase in interest
rate spread resulted from a 120 basis point decrease in the average
cost of interest-bearing liabilities, partially offset by an 83 basis point decrease in the average
yield on interest-earning assets. Expansion of our interest rate
spread was attributed primarily to the faster re-pricing of liabilities
(compared to assets) on the Company’s balance sheet in a falling rate
environment, combined with the improved slope of the yield
curve.
Interest
Income. Total interest income for the three- and nine-month
periods ended March 31, 2009, was $6.3 million and $18.9 million, respectively,
decreases of $96,000, or 1.5%, and $159,000, or 0.8%, respectively, from the
amounts earned in the same periods of the prior fiscal year. The decreases were
due to the 86 and 83 basis point decreases, respectively, in the yield on
interest-earning assets, partially offset by increases of $48.2 million, or
12.7%, and $46.3 million, or 12.6%, respectively, in the average balance of
interest-earning assets during the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31,
2009. For the three-and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2009, the
average interest rate on interest-earning assets was 5.90% and 6.12%,
respectively, as compared to 6.76% and 6.95%, respectively, for the same periods
of the prior year.
Interest
Expense. Total interest expense for the three- and nine-month
periods ended March 31, 2009, was $2.7 million and $8.4 million, respectively,
decreases of $593,000, or 18.0%, and $2.2 million, or 20.4%, respectively, as
compared to the same periods of the prior fiscal year. The decreases
were due to the 100 and 120 basis point decreases, respectively, in the average
cost of interest-bearing liabilities, partially offset by increases of $38.2
million, or 11.0%, and $39.0 million, or 11.6%, respectively, in the average
balance of interest-bearing liabilities during the three- and nine-month periods
ended March 31, 2009. For the three- and nine-month periods ended
March 31, 2009, the average interest rate on interest-bearing liabilities was
2.81% and 2.99%, respectively, as compared to 3.81% and 4.19%, respectively, for
the same periods of the prior fiscal year. The increase in the
average balance of interest-bearing liabilities was primarily due to funding
needed for asset growth.
Provision for Loan
Losses. The provision for loan losses for the three- and
nine-month periods ended March 31, 2009, was $410,000 and $1.0 million,
respectively, as compared to $350,000 and $550,000, respectively, for the same
periods of the prior fiscal year. The increase in provisions was
primarily due to management’s belief that it is appropriate to maintain larger
reserves in light of continuing deterioration of the credit and housing
markets. In addition, the Company’s growth, over the last several
years, in its commercial and commercial real estate loan portfolios has required
increased provisions for loan losses, as those loan types generally carry
additional risk. In general, however, the Company does not anticipate
that it will realize the level of credit problems that have been experienced by
financial institutions more heavily involved in either subprime or Alt-A
residential lending, or construction and development
lending. Although we believe that we have established and maintained
the allowance for loan losses at adequate levels, additions may be necessary as
the loan portfolio grows, as economic conditions remain poor, and as other
conditions differ from the current operating environment. Even though
we use the best information available, the level of the allowance for loan
losses remains an estimate that is subject to significant judgment and
short-term change. (See “Critical Accounting Policies”, “Allowance
for Loan Loss Activity” and “Nonperforming Assets”).
18
Non-interest
Income. Non-interest income for the three- and nine-month
periods ended March 31, 2009, was $582,000 and $1.2 million, respectively,
decreases of $19,000, or 3.2%, and $633,000, or 35.3%, compared to the same
periods of the prior fiscal year. The decrease for the three-month period
was primarily due to lower NSF volume, partially offset by higher income from
debit card activity, secondary loan market originations, and fees shared on
discount brokerage commissions. For the nine-month period, decreases
were primarily due to the charges incurred to recognize the other-than-temporary
impairment (“OTTI”) of two investments held by the Company. Outside
those charges, noninterest income would have increased 2.6% in the nine-month
period ended March 31, 2009, attributable to increased debit card activity fees
and secondary market loan sale income.
Non-interest
Expense. Non-interest expense for the three- and nine-month
periods ended March 31, 2009, was $2.3 million and $6.6 million, respectively,
increases of $354,000, or 17.8%, and $723,000, or 12.3%, respectively, compared
to the same periods of the prior fiscal year. For both the three- and
nine-month periods ended March 31, 2009, the increases in non-interest expense
were primarily in the categories
of compensation and benefits and deposit insurance
assessments. Compensation increases were attributed to the addition of key personnel and
general increases in
compensation levels. Deposit insurance assessment increases were
attributed to the exhaustion of the Bank’s one-time credit provided under the
new deposit insurance assessment program instituted by the FDIC in
2006, and base assessment
rate increases by the FDIC
in an attempt to replenish the DIF. Going forward, additional
deposit insurance assessment increases are anticipated based on the likelihood
of additional losses experienced by the DIF. As the Company continues to
grow its balance sheet, non-interest expense will continue to increase due to
compensation, expenses related to expansion, and inflation. Our
efficiency ratio, determined by dividing total non-interest expense by the sum
of net interest income and non-interest income, was 56.3% and 56.5%,
respectively, for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2009, as
compared to 54.0% and 57.1%, respectively, for the same periods of the prior
fiscal year.
Income
Taxes. Provisions for income taxes for the three- and
nine-month periods ended March 31, 2009, were $423,000 and $1.3 million,
respectively, decreases of $19,000, or 4.4%, and $22,000, or 1.7%, compared to
the same periods of the prior fiscal year. Our effective tax rate for
the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2009, was 30.1% and 30.9%,
respectively, as compared to 33.0% for the same periods of the prior fiscal
year. For both the three-and nine-month periods, the decrease in the
effective tax rate was attributable to the Company’s increased investment in
tax-exempt securities and purchases of tax credits; the decreases in tax
provisions were due to the lower effective tax rate, partially offset by higher
pre-tax income.
Allowance for Loan Loss
Activity
The
Company regularly reviews its allowance for loan losses and makes adjustments to
its balance based on management’s analysis of the loan portfolio, the amount of
non-performing and classified assets, as well as general economic
conditions. Although the Company maintains its allowance for loan
losses at a level that it considers sufficient to provide for losses, there can
be no assurance that future losses will not exceed internal
estimates. In addition, the amount of the allowance for loan losses
is subject to review by regulatory agencies, which can order the establishment
of additional loss provisions. The following table summarizes changes
in the allowance for loan losses over the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and
2008:
2009
|
2008
|
|
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$ 3,567,203
|
$ 2,537,659
|
Loans
charged off:
|
||
Residential
real estate
|
(19,382)
|
(18,919)
|
Commercial
business
|
(242,008)
|
-
|
Commercial
real estate
|
(10,495)
|
-
|
Consumer
|
(39,536)
|
(40,883)
|
Gross
charged off loans
|
(311,421)
|
(59,802)
|
Recoveries
of loans previously charged off:
|
||
Residential
real estate
|
2,898
|
792
|
Commercial
business
|
150
|
162,851
|
Commercial
real estate
|
6,500
|
-
|
Consumer
|
7,381
|
3,417
|
Gross
recoveries of charged off loans
|
16,929
|
167,060
|
Net
(charge offs) recoveries
|
(294,492)
|
107,258
|
Provision
charged to expense
|
1,010,000
|
550,000
|
Balance,
end of period
|
$ 4,282,711
|
$ 3,194,917
|
Ratio
of net charge offs (recoveries) during the period
|
0.08%
|
(0.03)%
|
to
average loans outstanding during the
period
|
The
allowance for loan losses has been calculated based upon an evaluation of
pertinent factors underlying the various types and quality of the Company’s
loans. Management considers such factors as the repayment status of a
loan, the estimated net fair value of the underlying collateral, the borrower’s
intent and ability to repay the loan, local economic conditions, and the
Company’s historical loss ratios. We maintain the allowance for loan
losses through the provisions for loan losses that we charge to
income. We charge losses on loans against the allowance for loan
losses when we believe the collection of loan
19
principal
is unlikely. The allowance for loan losses increased $716,000 to $4.3 million at
March 31, 2009, from $3.6 million at June 30, 2008. At March 31,
2009, the Bank had $9.8 million, or 2.15% of total assets, adversely classified
($9.8 million classified “substandard” none classified “doubtful” or “loss”),
as compared to adversely classified assets of $4.5 million, or 1.07% of total
assets at June 30, 2008, and $4.2 million, or 1.03% of total assets, adversely
classified at March 31, 2008. The increase is primarily due to the
classification of two loans totaling $3.5 million outstanding to a bank holding
company, as well as the classification of the Company’s investments in pooled
trust preferred securities (see “Executive Summary”). Other
classified assets were generally comprised of loans secured by commercial real
estate, agricultural real estate, or inventory and equipment. With
the exception of the Trapeza IV CDO (see “Executive Summary” and “Nonperforming
Assets”), all classified assets were performing in accordance with terms at
March 31, 2009. All assets were classified due to concerns as to the
borrowers’ ability to continue to generate sufficient cash flows to service the
debt.
While
management believes that our asset quality remains strong, it recognizes that,
due to the continued growth in the loan portfolio and potential changes in
market conditions, our level of nonperforming assets and resulting charge offs
may fluctuate. Higher levels of net charge offs requiring additional provisions
for loan losses could result. Although management uses the best
information available, the level of the allowance for loan losses remains an
estimate that is subject to significant judgment and short-term
change.
Nonperforming
Assets
The ratio
of nonperforming assets to total assets and non-performing loans to net loans
receivable is another measure of asset quality. Nonperforming assets
of the Company include nonaccruing loans, accruing loans delinquent/past
maturity 90 days or more, and assets which have been acquired as a result of
foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. The table on the
following page summarizes changes in the Company’s level of nonperforming assets
over selected time periods:
3/31/2009
|
6/30/2008
|
3/31/2008
|
|
Loans
past maturity/delinquent 90 days or more and non-accrual
loans
|
|||
Residential
real estate
|
$ 185,000
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
Commercial
real estate
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Consumer
|
17,000
|
6,000
|
25,000
|
Total
loans past maturity/delinquent 90 days or more and non-accrual
loans
|
202,000
|
6,000
|
25,000
|
Nonperforming
investments
|
125,000
|
-
|
-
|
Foreclosed
real estate or other real estate owned
|
148,000
|
38,000
|
38,000
|
Other
repossessed assets
|
215,000
|
24,000
|
19,000
|
Total
nonperforming assets
|
$ 690,000
|
$ 68,000
|
$ 82,000
|
Percentage
nonperforming assets to total assets
|
0.15%
|
0.02%
|
0.02%
|
Percentage
nonperforming loans to net loans
|
0.06%
|
0.00%
|
0.01%
|
At March 31, 2009, non-performing assets
totaled $690,000, up from $68,000 at June 30, 2008, and $82,000 at March 31,
2008. A single relationship consisting of two delinquent loans and
one parcel of foreclosed real estate accounts for the majority of the increase
in those non-performing asset classes. Most of the increase in other
repossessed assets was due to collateral repossessed from one commercial borrower, to which most of the increase in charge-offs for the
nine-month period ended March 31, 2009, can also be attributed (see Allowance
for Loan Loss Activity). Nonperforming investments consist of the
Company’s investment in Trapeza CDO IV, Ltd., class C2 (see Executive
Summary).
Liquidity
Resources
The term
“liquidity” refers to our ability to generate adequate amounts of cash to fund
loan originations, loans purchases, deposit withdrawals and operating expenses.
Our primary sources of funds include deposit growth, securities sold under
agreements to repurchase, FHLB advances, brokered deposits, amortization and
prepayment of loan principal and interest, investment maturities and sales, and
funds provided by our operations. While the scheduled loan repayments and
maturing investments are relatively predictable, deposit flows, FHLB advance
redemptions, and loan and security prepayment rates are significantly influenced
by factors outside of the Bank’s control, including interest rates, general and
local economic conditions and competition in the marketplace. The
Bank relies on FHLB advances and brokered deposits as additional sources for
funding cash or liquidity needs.
The
Company uses its liquid resources principally to satisfy its ongoing cash
requirements, which include funding loan commitments, funding maturing
certificates of deposit and deposit withdrawals, maintaining liquidity, funding
maturing or called FHLB advances, purchasing investments, and meeting operating
expenses. At March 31, 2009, the Company had outstanding commitments
to fund approximately $56.8 million in mortgage and non-mortgage
loans. These commitments are expected to be funded through existing
cash balances, cash flow from normal operations and, if needed, FHLB
advances. At March 31, 2009, the Bank had pledged its residential
real estate loan portfolio and a significant portion of its commercial real
estate portfolio with the FHLB for available credit of approximately $129.0
million, of which $72.5 million had been advanced (additionally, letters of
credit totaling $1.5 million had been issued on the Bank’s behalf in order to
secure public unit funding).
20
The Bank
has the ability to pledge several of its other loan portfolios, including home
equity and commercial business loans, which could provide additional collateral
for additional borrowings; in total, FHLB borrowings are generally limited to
40% of Bank assets, or $180.7 million, which means $106.7 million in borrowings
remain available. Along with the ability to borrow from the FHLB,
management believes its liquid resources will be sufficient to meet the
Company’s liquidity needs.
Regulatory
Capital
The Bank
is subject to minimum regulatory capital requirements pursuant to regulations
adopted by the federal banking agencies. The requirements address
both risk-based capital and leverage capital. As of March 31, 2009,
and June 30, 2008, the Bank met all applicable adequacy
requirements.
The FDIC
has in place qualifications for banks to be classified as
“well-capitalized.” As of March 31, 2009, the most recent
notification from the FDIC categorized the Bank as
“well-capitalized.” There were no conditions or events since the FDIC
notification that has changed the Bank’s classification.
The
Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios are also presented in the following
tables.
Actual
|
For
Capital Adequacy
Purposes
|
To
Be Well Capitalized
Under
Prompt Corrective
Action
Provisions
|
||||
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
|
As
of March 31, 2009
|
||||||
Total
Capital
(to
Risk-Weighted Assets)
|
$ 42,839,000
|
12.74%
|
$ 26,892,000
|
8.00%
|
$ 33,615,000
|
10.00%
|
Tier
I Capital
(to
Risk-Weighted Assets)
|
38,632,000
|
11.49%
|
13,446,000
|
4.00%
|
20,169,000
|
6.00%
|
Tier
I Capital
(to
Average Assets)
|
38,632,000
|
8.67%
|
17,834,000
|
4.00%
|
22,293,000
|
5.00%
|
Actual
|
For
Capital Adequacy
Purposes
|
To
Be Well Capitalized
Under
Prompt Corrective
Action
Provisions
|
||||
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
|
As
of June 30, 2008
|
||||||
Total
Risk-Based Capital
(to
Risk-Weighted Assets)
|
$ 36,302,000
|
11.79%
|
$ 24,631,000
|
8.00%
|
$ 30,789,000
|
10.00%
|
Tier
I Capital
(to
Risk-Weighted Assets)
|
32,735,000
|
10.63%
|
12,315,000
|
4.00%
|
18,473,000
|
6.00%
|
Tier
I Capital
(to
Average Assets)
|
32,735,000
|
8.08%
|
16,214,000
|
4.00%
|
20,267,000
|
5.00%
|
21
PART I: Item
3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
SOUTHERN
MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
Asset and Liability
Management and Market Risk
The goal
of the Company’s asset/liability management strategy is to manage the interest
rate sensitivity of both interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities in order to maximize net interest income without exposing the Bank
to an excessive level of interest rate risk. The Company employs
various strategies intended to manage the potential effect that changing
interest rates may have on future operating results. The primary
asset/liability management strategy has been to focus on matching the
anticipated re-pricing intervals of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities. At times, however, depending on the level of general interest
rates, the relationship between long- and short-term interest rates, market
conditions and competitive factors, the Company may determine to increase its
interest rate risk position somewhat in order to maintain its net interest
margin.
In an
effort to manage the interest rate risk resulting from fixed rate lending, the
Bank has utilized longer term FHLB advances (with maturities up to ten years),
subject to early redemptions and fixed terms. Other elements of the
Company’s current asset/liability strategy include (i) increasing originations
of commercial business, commercial real estate, agricultural operating lines,
and agricultural real estate loans, which typically provide higher yields and
shorter repricing periods, but inherently increase credit risk; (ii) actively
soliciting less rate-sensitive deposits, including aggressive use of the
Company’s “rewards checking” product, and (iii) offering competitively-priced
money market accounts and CDs with maturities of up to five
years. The degree to which each segment of the strategy is achieved
will affect profitability and exposure to interest rate risk.
The
Company continues to originate long-term, fixed-rate residential
loans. During the first nine months of fiscal year 2009, fixed rate
residential loan production totaled $12.5 million, as compared to $16.1 million
during the same period of the prior year. At March 31, 2009, the
fixed rate residential loan portfolio was $97.0 million with a weighted average
maturity of 207 months, as compared to $98.0 million at March 31, 2008, with a
weighted average maturity of 205 months. The Company originated $9.0
million in adjustable-rate residential loans during the nine-month period ended
March 31, 2009, as compared to $6.5 million during the same period of the prior
year. At March 31, 2009, fixed rate loans with remaining maturities
in excess of 10 years totaled $89.9 million, or 25.1% of net loans receivable,
as compared to $81.8 million, or 24.7% of net loans receivable at March 31,
2008. The Company originated $40.7 million of fixed rate commercial
and commercial real estate loans during the nine-month period ended March 31,
2009, as compared to $43.0 million during the same period of the prior
year. At March 31, 2009, the fixed rate commercial and commercial
real estate loan portfolio was $111.7 million with a weighted average maturity
of 39.1 months, compared to $112.3 million at March 31, 2008, with a weighted
average maturity of 29 months. The Company originated $52.4 million
in adjustable rate commercial and commercial real estate loans during the
nine-month period ended March 31, 2009, as compared to $35.9 million during the
same period of the prior year. At March 31, 2009, adjustable-rate
home equity lines of credit totaled $10.8 million, as compared to $7.4 million
at March 31, 2008. Over the last several years, the Company had
maintained a relatively short weighted average life of its investment portfolio;
however, in anticipation of the current declining rate environment, management
began to expand the portfolio’s duration during the prior fiscal
year. At March 31, 2009, the portfolio’s weighted-average life stands
at 4.3 years, compared to 4.9 years at March 31, 2008 (despite management’s
efforts to expand the duration of the portfolio, the estimated weighted-average
life of the portfolio has dropped in recent months as prepayment activity on
mortgage-backed securities accelerates). Management continues to
focus on customer retention, customer satisfaction, and offering new products to
customers in order to increase the Company’s amount of less rate-sensitive
deposit accounts. The company remains “liability-sensitive,” in that
our liabilities generally re-price more quickly than our assets. As
we have reached what we expect to be the bottom of the current interest rate
cycle, it is anticipated that management will seek to reduce the amount of
sensitivity, but management does not expect to achieve the ability to maintain
its net interest margin in a rising rate environment.
22
Interest Rate Sensitivity
Analysis
The following table sets forth as of
March 31, 2009, management’s estimates of the
projected changes in net portfolio value ("NPV") in the event of 100, 200, and
300 basis point ("bp") instantaneous and permanent increases, and 100, 200, and
300 basis point instantaneous and permanent decreases in market interest rates.
Dollar amounts are expressed in thousands.
BP Change
|
Estimated Net Portfolio
Value
|
NPV as % of PV of
Assets
|
||||||||||||||||||
in Rates
|
$ Amount
|
$ Change
|
% Change
|
NPV Ratio
|
Change
|
|||||||||||||||
+300
|
$
|
35,448
|
$
|
(7,474
|
)
|
-17
|
%
|
7.96
|
%
|
-1.30
|
%
|
|||||||||
+200
|
38,886
|
(4,036
|
)
|
-9
|
%
|
8.18
|
%
|
-1.08
|
%
|
|||||||||||
+100
|
42,046
|
(876
|
)
|
-2
|
%
|
8.65
|
%
|
-0.61
|
%
|
|||||||||||
NC
|
42,922
|
-
|
-
|
9.26
|
%
|
-
|
||||||||||||||
-100
|
40,327
|
(2,595
|
-6
|
%
|
9.18
|
%
|
-0.08
|
%
|
||||||||||||
-200
|
38,412
|
(4,510
|
)
|
-11
|
%
|
8.61
|
%
|
-0.65
|
%
|
|||||||||||
-300
|
37,655
|
(5,267
|
-12
|
%
|
7.95
|
%
|
-1.31
|
%
|
Computations of prospective effects of
hypothetical interest rate changes are based on an internally generated model
using actual maturity and repricing schedules for the Bank’s loans and deposits,
and are based on numerous assumptions, including relative levels of market
interest rates, loan repayments and deposit run-offs, and should not be relied
upon as indicative of actual results. Further, the computations do not
contemplate any actions the Bank may undertake in response to changes in
interest rates.
Management cannot predict future
interest rates or their effect on the Bank’s NPV in the future. Certain
shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the computation
of NPV. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar
maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in differing degrees to
changes in market interest rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as
adjustable-rate loans, have an initial fixed rate period typically from one to
five years and over the remaining life of the asset changes in the interest rate
are restricted. In addition, the proportion of adjustable-rate loans in the
Bank’s portfolio could decrease in future periods due to refinancing activity if
market interest rates remain steady in the future. Further, in the event of a
change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels could deviate
significantly from those assumed in the table. Finally, the ability of many
borrowers to service their adjustable-rate debt may decrease in the event of an
interest rate increase.
The Bank’s Board of Directors (the
"Board") is responsible for reviewing the Bank’s asset and liability policies.
The Board’s Asset/Liability Committee meets monthly to review interest rate risk
and trends, as well as liquidity and capital ratios and requirements. The Bank’s
management is responsible for administering the policies and determinations of
the Board with respect to the Bank’s asset and liability goals and
strategies.
23
PART I: Item
4: Controls and Procedures
SOUTHERN
MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
An
evaluation of Southern Missouri Bancorp’s disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, (the “Act”)) as of March 31, 2009, was carried out under the
supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive and Financial
Officer, and several other members of our senior management. The
Chief Executive and Financial Officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2009, the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that the
information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or
submits under the Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to management
(including the Chief Executive and Financial Officer) in a timely manner, and
(ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. There have been no changes in
our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Act) that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2009, that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
The
Company does not expect that its disclosures and procedures will prevent all
error and all fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well
conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance
that the objectives of the control procedure are met. Because of the
inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if
any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent
limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be
faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or
mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual
acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management
override of the control. The design of any control procedure also is
based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events,
and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its
stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the
inherent limitations in a cost-effective control procedure, misstatements due to
error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
24
PART II: Other
Information
SOUTHERN
MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
Item
1: Legal Proceedings
In the opinion of management, the
Company and Bank are not a party to any pending claims or lawsuits that
are expected to have a material effect on the Company’s or the Bank's financial condition or
operations. Periodically, there have been various claims and lawsuits involving
the Company and
Bank mainly as a defendant,
such as claims to enforce liens, condemnation proceedings on properties in which
the Company or Bank holds security interests, claims
involving the making and servicing of real property loans and other issues
incident to the Company and
Bank's business. Aside from
such pending claims and lawsuits, which are incident to the conduct of the
Company and Bank's ordinary
business, neither the Company nor Bank is party to any material pending
legal proceedings that would have a material effect on the financial condition
or operations of the Company or Bank.
Item
1a: Risk Factors
The following risk factors represent
changes or additions to, and should be read in conjunction with, the risk
factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended June 30, 2008:
Difficult global market conditions and
economic trends have adversely affected our industry and, to a lesser extent,
our business.
Dramatic declines in the US housing
market, with decreasing home prices and increasing delinquencies and
foreclosures, have negatively impacted the credit performance of mortgage and
construction loans, and resulted in significant write-downs of assets by many
financial institutions. General downward economic trends, reduced availability
of commercial credit and increasing unemployment have negatively impacted the
credit performance of commercial and consumer credit, resulting in additional
write-downs. Concerns over the stability of the financial markets and the
economy have resulted in decreased lending by financial institutions to their
customers and to each other. This market turmoil and tightening of credit has
led to increased commercial and consumer deficiencies, lack of customer
confidence, increased market volatility, and widespread reduction in general
business activity. Financial institutions have experienced decreased access to
deposits or borrowings.
The resulting economic pressure on
consumers and businesses and the lack of confidence in the financial markets may
adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and
stock price.
Our ability to assess the
creditworthiness of customers and to estimate the losses inherent in our credit
exposure is made more complex by these difficult market and economic conditions.
We also expect to face increased regulation and government oversight as a result
of these downward trends. This increased government action may increase our
costs and limit our ability to pursue certain business opportunities. We expect
to pay higher Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) premiums than we have
over recent periods, because financial institution failures resulting from the
depressed market conditions have depleted and may continue to deplete the
deposit insurance fund and reduce its ratio of reserves to insured
deposits.
We do not believe these difficult
conditions are likely to improve in the near future. A worsening of these
conditions would likely exacerbate the adverse effects of these difficult market
and economic conditions on us, our customers, and the other financial
institutions in our market. As a result, we may experience increases in
foreclosures, delinquencies, and customer bankruptcies, as well as more
restricted access to funds.
Recent legislative and regulator
initiatives to address these difficult market and economic conditions may not
stabilize the US banking
system.
The recently-enacted Emergency Economic
Stabilization Act of 2008 ("EESA") authorizes the United States Department of
Treasury ("Treasury") to purchase from financial institutions and their holding
companies up to $750 billion in mortgage loans, mortgage-related securities, and
certain other financial instruments, including debt and equity securities issued
by financial institutions and their holding companies in a Troubled Asset Relief
Program ("TARP"). The purpose of the TARP is to restore confidence and stability
to the US banking system and to encourage financial institutions to increase
their lending to customers and to each other. The Treasury has allocated $250
billion under the TARP for a Capital Purchase Program ("CPP"). Under the CPP,
the Treasury will purchase debt or equity securities from participating
institutions. The TARP is also expected to include direct purchases or
guarantees of troubled assets of financial institutions.
25
The EESA also increased FDIC deposit
insurance on most accounts from $100,000 to $250,000. This increase is in place
until the end of 2009 and is not covered by deposit insurance premiums paid by
the banking industry. In addition, the FDIC has implemented two temporary
programs to provide deposit insurance for the full amount of most non-interest
bearing transaction accounts through the end of 2009 and to guarantee certain
unsecured debt of financial institutions and their holding companies through June 2012. Financial institutions were required to decide by December 5, 2008,
whether to participate in the two programs (Southern Missouri elected to
participate in both programs). The purpose of these legislative and
regulatory actions is to stabilize the volatility in the US banking
system.
The EESA, the TARP, and the FDIC's
recent regulatory initiative may not stabilize the US banking system or
financial markets. If the volatility in the market and the economy continue or
worsen, our business, financial condition, results of operations, access to
funds, and the price of our stock could all be materially and adversely
impacted.
Item
2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
Period
|
Total
Number of
Shares
(or Units)
Purchased
|
Average
Price Paid
per
Share (or Unit)
|
Total
Number of Shares (or Units)
Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced
Plans or Programs
|
Maximum
Number (or
Approximate
Dollar Value) of
Shares
(or Units) that May Yet be
Purchased
Under the Plans or
Program
|
1/1/2009
thru
1/31/2009
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2/1/2009
thru 2/28/2009
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3/1/2009
thru 3/31/2009
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Item
3: Defaults upon Senior Securities
Not
applicable
Item
4: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders
None
Item 5 -
Other
Information
None
Item 6 –
Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
|
|||||
(3)
|
(a)
|
Certificate
of Incorporation of the Registrant+
|
|||
(3)
|
(b)
|
Bylaws
of the Registrant+
|
|||
(4)
|
Form
of Stock Certificate of Southern Missouri Bancorp++
|
||||
(10)
|
Material
Contracts
|
||||
(a)
|
Registrant’s
Stock Option Plan+++
|
||||
(b)
|
Southern
Missouri Savings Bank, FSB Management Recognition and Development
Plans+++
|
||||
(c)
|
Employment
Agreements
|
||||
(i)
|
Greg
A. Steffens*
|
||||
(d)
|
Director’s
Retirement Agreements
|
||||
(ii)
|
Samuel
H. Smith**
|
||||
(iii)
|
Sammy
A. Schalk***
|
||||
(iii)
|
Ronnie
D. Black***
|
||||
a.
|
L.
Douglas Bagby***
|
||||
b.
|
Rebecca
McLane Brooks****
|
||||
c.
|
Charles
R. Love****
|
||||
d.
|
Charles
R. Moffitt****
|
||||
e.
|
Dennis
Robison*****
|
||||
(e)
|
Tax
Sharing Agreement***
|
26
31 Rule
13a-14(a) Certification
32 Section
1350 Certification
+
|
Filed
as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended June 30, 1999
|
++
|
Filed
as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-2320) as filed with the SEC on January 3, 1994.
|
+++
|
Filed
as an exhibit to the registrant’s 1994 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement
dated October 21, 1994.
|
*
|
Filed
as an exhibit to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended June 30, 1999.
|
**
|
Filed
as an exhibit to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended June 30, 1995.
|
***
|
Filed
as an exhibit to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended December 31, 2000.
|
****
|
Filed
as an exhibit to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended December 31, 2004.
|
*****
|
Filed
as an exhibit to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended December 31,
2008.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP,
INC.
|
||
Registrant
|
||
Date: May
15, 2009
|
/s/ Samuel H. Smith
|
|
Samuel
H. Smith
|
||
Chairman
of the Board of Directors
|
||
Date: May
15, 2009
|
/s/ Greg A. Steffens
|
|
Greg
A. Steffens
|
||
President
(Principal Executive, Financial and
|
||
Accounting
Officer)
|