SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC. - Quarter Report: 2019 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
X |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2019
OR
___ |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-23406
Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Missouri
|
|
43-1665523
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
|
|
|
|
2991 Oak Grove Road, Poplar Bluff, Missouri
|
|
63901
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
|
|
|
(573) 778-1800
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
|
|
Trading Symbol
|
|
Name of Each Exchange
on Which Registered |
Common Stock,
par value $0.01 per share |
SMBC
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
|
X
|
No
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data file required to be submitted
pursuant to Rule 405 of regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
|
X
|
No
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):
Large accelerated filer
|
Accelerated filer
|
X
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
Smaller reporting company
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or
revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12 b-2 of the Exchange Act)
Yes
|
No
|
X
|
Class
|
Outstanding at November 8, 2019
|
|
Common Stock, Par Value $.01
|
9,201,783 Shares
|
SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
PART I.
|
Financial Information
|
PAGE NO.
|
Item 1.
|
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
- Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
3
|
|
- Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
|
4
|
|
- Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
5
|
|
- Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
|
6
|
|
- Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
7
|
|
- Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
8
|
|
Item 2.
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
33
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
47
|
Item 4.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
49
|
PART II.
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
50
|
Item 1.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
50
|
Item 1a.
|
Risk Factors
|
50
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
50
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults upon Senior Securities
|
50
|
Item 4.
|
Mine Safety Disclosures
|
50
|
Item 5.
|
Other Information
|
50
|
Item 6.
|
Exhibits
|
51
|
- Signature Page
|
52
|
|
- Certifications
|
53
|
|
2
PART I: Item 1: Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 AND JUNE 30, 2019
(dollars in thousands)
|
September 30, 2019
|
June 30, 2019
|
||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
31,423
|
$
|
35,400
|
||||
Interest-bearing time deposits
|
971
|
969
|
||||||
Available for sale securities
|
171,006
|
165,535
|
||||||
Stock in FHLB of Des Moines
|
7,733
|
5,233
|
||||||
Stock in Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
|
4,350
|
4,350
|
||||||
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of
$20,710 and $19,903 at September 30, 2019 and June 30, 2019, respectively |
1,874,497
|
1,846,405
|
||||||
Accrued interest receivable
|
11,648
|
10,189
|
||||||
Premises and equipment, net
|
65,480
|
62,727
|
||||||
Bank owned life insurance – cash surrender value
|
38,593
|
38,337
|
||||||
Goodwill
|
14,089
|
14,089
|
||||||
Other intangible assets, net
|
8,800
|
9,239
|
||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
22,617
|
21,929
|
||||||
Total Assets
|
$
|
2,251,207
|
$
|
2,214,402
|
||||
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
||||||||
Deposits
|
$
|
1,872,520
|
$
|
1,893,695
|
||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
-
|
4,376
|
||||||
Advances from FHLB of Des Moines
|
103,327
|
44,908
|
||||||
Note payable
|
3,000
|
3,000
|
||||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
13,130
|
12,889
|
||||||
Accrued interest payable
|
1,900
|
2,099
|
||||||
Subordinated debt
|
15,068
|
15,043
|
||||||
Total liabilities
|
2,008,945
|
1,976,010
|
||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized;
9,323,184 and 9,324,659 shares issued, respectively, at September 30, 2019 and June 30, 2019 |
93
|
93
|
||||||
Additional paid-in capital
|
94,572
|
94,541
|
||||||
Retained earnings
|
150,123
|
143,677
|
||||||
Treasury Stock of 121,401 and 35,351 shares at September 30, 2019
and June 30, 2019, respectively, at cost |
(3,980
|
)
|
(1,166
|
)
|
||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
1,454
|
1,247
|
||||||
Total stockholders' equity
|
242,262
|
238,392
|
||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$
|
2,251,207
|
$
|
2,214,402
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 AND 2018 (Unaudited)
Three months ended
|
||||||||
September 30,
|
||||||||
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
|
||||||||
INTEREST INCOME:
|
||||||||
Loans
|
$
|
25,640
|
$
|
20,916
|
||||
Investment securities
|
520
|
517
|
||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
716
|
584
|
||||||
Other interest-earning assets
|
46
|
25
|
||||||
Total interest income
|
26,922
|
22,042
|
||||||
INTEREST EXPENSE:
|
||||||||
Deposits
|
6,578
|
4,009
|
||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
-
|
8
|
||||||
Advances from FHLB of Des Moines
|
522
|
599
|
||||||
Note payable
|
37
|
35
|
||||||
Subordinated debt
|
225
|
224
|
||||||
Total interest expense
|
7,362
|
4,875
|
||||||
NET INTEREST INCOME
|
19,560
|
17,167
|
||||||
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
|
896
|
682
|
||||||
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER
|
||||||||
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
|
18,664
|
16,485
|
||||||
NONINTEREST INCOME:
|
||||||||
Deposit account charges and related fees
|
1,423
|
1,224
|
||||||
Bank card interchange income
|
1,362
|
1,063
|
||||||
Loan late charges
|
146
|
94
|
||||||
Loan servicing fees
|
130
|
159
|
||||||
Other loan fees
|
243
|
337
|
||||||
Net realized gains on sale of loans
|
273
|
179
|
||||||
Earnings on bank owned life insurance
|
254
|
246
|
||||||
Other income
|
270
|
128
|
||||||
Total noninterest income
|
4,101
|
3,430
|
||||||
NONINTEREST EXPENSE:
|
||||||||
Compensation and benefits
|
7,125
|
6,047
|
||||||
Occupancy and equipment, net
|
2,888
|
2,470
|
||||||
Deposit insurance premiums
|
-
|
138
|
||||||
Legal and professional fees
|
184
|
256
|
||||||
Advertising
|
309
|
315
|
||||||
Postage and office supplies
|
183
|
152
|
||||||
Intangible amortization
|
441
|
396
|
||||||
Bank card network expense
|
617
|
495
|
||||||
Other operating expense
|
1,214
|
1,180
|
||||||
Total noninterest expense
|
12,961
|
11,449
|
||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
9,804
|
8,466
|
||||||
INCOME TAXES
|
1,976
|
1,666
|
||||||
NET INCOME
|
$
|
7,828
|
$
|
6,800
|
||||
Basic earnings per common share
|
$
|
0.85
|
$
|
0.76
|
||||
Diluted earnings per common share
|
$
|
0.85
|
$
|
0.76
|
||||
Dividends per common share
|
$
|
0.15
|
$
|
0.13
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 AND 2018 (Unaudited)
Three months ended
|
||||||||
September 30,
|
||||||||
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||
Net income
|
$
|
7,828
|
$
|
6,800
|
||||
Other comprehensive income:
|
||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale
|
263
|
(378
|
)
|
|||||
Tax benefit (expense)
|
(56
|
)
|
91
|
|||||
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
|
207
|
(287
|
)
|
|||||
Comprehensive income
|
$
|
8,035
|
$
|
6,513
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 AND 2018 (Unaudited)
For the three-month period ended September 30, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
Accumulated Other
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
|
Paid-In
|
Retained
|
Treasury
|
Comprehensive
|
Stockholders'
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Stock
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Stock
|
Income (Loss)
|
Equity
|
||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE AS OF JUNE 30, 2019
|
$
|
93
|
$
|
94,541
|
$
|
143,677
|
$
|
(1,166
|
)
|
$
|
1,247
|
$
|
238,392
|
|||||||||||
Net Income
|
7,828
|
7,828
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized loss on available for sale securities
|
207
|
207
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid on common stock ($.15 per share )
|
(1,382
|
)
|
(1,382
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option expense
|
17
|
17
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock grant expense
|
14
|
14
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock purchased
|
(2,814
|
)
|
(2,814
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2019
|
$
|
93
|
$
|
94,572
|
$
|
150,123
|
$
|
(3,980
|
)
|
$
|
1,454
|
$
|
242,262
|
|||||||||||
For the three-month period ended September 30, 2018
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
Accumulated Other
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
|
Paid-In
|
Retained
|
Treasury
|
Comprehensive
|
Stockholders'
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Stock
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Stock
|
Income (Loss)
|
Equity
|
||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE AS OF JUNE 30, 2018
|
$
|
90
|
$
|
83,413
|
$
|
119,536
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(2,345
|
)
|
$
|
200,694
|
|||||||||||
Net Income
|
6,800
|
6,800
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized loss on available for sale securities
|
-
|
(287
|
)
|
(287
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid on common stock ($.13 per share )
|
(1,169
|
)
|
(1,169
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option expense
|
10
|
10
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock grant expense
|
14
|
14
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2018
|
$
|
90
|
$
|
83,437
|
$
|
125,167
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(2,632
|
)
|
$
|
206,062
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
6
SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 AND 2018 (Unaudited)
Three months ended September 30,
|
||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
2019
|
2018
|
||||||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
|
||||||||
Net Income
|
$
|
7,828
|
$
|
6,800
|
||||
Items not requiring (providing) cash:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
|
920
|
777
|
||||||
(Gain) loss on disposal of fixed assets
|
(2
|
)
|
8
|
|||||
Stock option and stock grant expense
|
31
|
23
|
||||||
Loss on sale/write-down of REO
|
10
|
22
|
||||||
Amortization of intangible assets
|
441
|
396
|
||||||
Amortization of purchase accounting adjustments
|
(492
|
)
|
(1,159
|
)
|
||||
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance (BOLI)
|
(254
|
)
|
(246
|
)
|
||||
Provision for loan losses
|
896
|
682
|
||||||
Net amortization of premiums and discounts on securities
|
264
|
230
|
||||||
Originations of loans held for sale
|
(10,132
|
)
|
(7,420
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale
|
9,986
|
7,936
|
||||||
Gain on sales of loans held for sale
|
(273
|
)
|
(179
|
)
|
||||
Changes in:
|
||||||||
Accrued interest receivable
|
(1,459
|
)
|
(1,620
|
)
|
||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
(2,638
|
)
|
1,434
|
|||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
276
|
(903
|
)
|
|||||
Deferred income taxes
|
6
|
6
|
||||||
Accrued interest payable
|
(199
|
)
|
185
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
5,209
|
6,972
|
||||||
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Net increase in loans
|
(28,472
|
)
|
(62,129
|
)
|
||||
Net change in interest-bearing deposits
|
(1
|
)
|
(4
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds from maturities of available for sale securities
|
11,041
|
5,748
|
||||||
Net redemptions (purchases) of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
-
|
(1,780
|
)
|
|||||
Net purchases of Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis stock
|
(2,500
|
)
|
-
|
|||||
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
|
(16,512
|
)
|
(4,655
|
)
|
||||
Purchases of premises and equipment
|
(1,687
|
)
|
(622
|
)
|
||||
Investments in state & federal tax credits
|
(10
|
)
|
(231
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets
|
13
|
-
|
||||||
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets
|
275
|
421
|
||||||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(37,853
|
)
|
(63,252
|
)
|
||||
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Net decrease in demand deposits and savings accounts
|
(8,949
|
)
|
(36,827
|
)
|
||||
Net (decrease) increase in certificates of deposits
|
(12,200
|
)
|
48,066
|
|||||
Net (decrease) increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
(4,376
|
)
|
364
|
|||||
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
147,550
|
192,550
|
||||||
Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
(89,162
|
)
|
(150,900
|
)
|
||||
Purchase of treasury stock
|
(2,814
|
)
|
-
|
|||||
Dividends paid on common stock
|
(1,382
|
)
|
(1,169
|
)
|
||||
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
28,667
|
52,084
|
||||||
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(3,977
|
)
|
(4,196
|
)
|
||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
35,400
|
26,326
|
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
31,423
|
$
|
22,130
|
||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Noncash investing and financing activities:
|
||||||||
Conversion of loans to foreclosed real estate
|
$
|
365
|
$
|
1,495
|
||||
Conversion of loans to repossessed assets
|
59
|
11
|
||||||
Right of use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease obligations
|
1,996
|
-
|
||||||
Cash paid during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest (net of interest credited)
|
$
|
964
|
$
|
1,005
|
||||
Income taxes
|
2,856
|
310
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
7
SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Note 1: Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all material adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have
been included. The consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of June 30, 2019, has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of that date. Operating results for the three-month period ended September 30, 2019,
are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year. For additional information, refer to the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s June 30, 2019, Form 10-K, which was filed
with the SEC.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Southern Bank. All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Note 2: Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization. Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc., a Missouri corporation (the Company) was organized in 1994 and is the parent company of Southern
Bank (the Bank). Substantially all of the Company’s consolidated revenues are derived from the operations of the Bank, and the Bank represents substantially all of the Company’s consolidated assets and liabilities. SB Real Estate Investments, LLC
is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank formed to hold Southern Bank Real Estate Investments, LLC. Southern Bank Real Estate Investments, LLC is a real estate investment trust (REIT) which is controlled by the investment subsidiary, and has other
preferred shareholders in order to meet the requirements to be a REIT. At September 30, 2019, assets of the REIT were approximately $744 million, and consisted primarily of loan participations acquired from the Bank.
The Bank is primarily engaged in providing a full range of banking and financial services to individuals and corporate customers in its market areas. The Bank and Company are subject
to competition from other financial institutions. The Bank and Company are subject to the regulation of certain federal and state agencies and undergo periodic examinations by those regulatory authorities.
Basis of Financial Statement Presentation. The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America and general practices within the banking industry. In the normal course of business, the Company encounters two significant types of risk: economic and regulatory. Economic risk is comprised of
interest rate risk, credit risk, and market risk. The Company is subject to interest rate risk to the degree that its interest-bearing liabilities reprice on a different basis than its interest-earning assets. Credit risk is the risk of default on
the Company’s investment or loan portfolios resulting from the borrowers’ inability or unwillingness to make contractually required payments. Market risk reflects changes in the value of the investment portfolio, collateral underlying loans
receivable, and the value of the Company’s investments in real estate.
Principles of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, the
Bank. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
8
Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses and estimated fair values of purchased loans.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents includes
cash, due from depository institutions and interest-bearing deposits in other depository institutions with original maturities of three months or less. Interest-bearing deposits in other depository institutions were $6.9 million at September 30 and
June 30, 2019. The deposits are held in various commercial banks in amounts not exceeding the FDIC’s deposit insurance limits, as well as at the Federal Reserve and the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines and Chicago.
Interest-bearing Time Deposits. Interest bearing deposits in banks mature within seven years and are carried at cost.
Available for Sale Securities. Available for sale securities, which include any security for which the
Company has no immediate plan to sell but which may be sold in the future, are carried at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component of stockholders’ equity. All
securities have been classified as available for sale.
Premiums and discounts on debt securities are amortized or accreted as adjustments to income over the estimated life of the security using the level yield method. Realized gains or
losses on the sale of securities is based on the specific identification method. The fair value of securities is based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market
prices for similar securities.
The Company does not invest in collateralized mortgage obligations that are considered high risk.
When the Company does not intend to sell a debt security, and it is more likely than not the Company will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis, it recognizes
the credit component of an other-than-temporary impairment of a debt security in earnings and the remaining portion in other comprehensive income. As a result of this guidance, the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of the dates presented
reflects the full impairment (that is, the difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and fair value) on debt securities that the Company intends to sell or would more likely than not be required to sell before the expected recovery of
the amortized cost basis. For available-for-sale debt securities that management has no intent to sell and believes that it more likely than not will not be required to sell prior to recovery, only the credit loss component of the impairment is
recognized in earnings, while the noncredit loss is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. The credit loss component recognized in earnings is identified as the amount of principal cash flows not expected to be received over the
remaining term of the security as projected based on cash flow projections.
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank Stock. The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) system, and the Federal
Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Capital stock of the FHLB and the Federal Reserve is a required investment based upon a predetermined formula and is carried at cost.
Loans. Loans are generally stated at unpaid principal balances, less the allowance for loan losses, any net deferred loan origination fees,
and unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans.
Interest on loans is accrued based upon the principal amount outstanding. The accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when, in management’s judgment, the collectability of
interest or principal in the normal course of business is doubtful. The Company complies with regulatory guidance which indicates that loans should be placed in nonaccrual status when 90 days past due, unless the loan is both well-secured and in
the process of collection. A loan that is “in the process of collection” may be subject to legal action or, in appropriate circumstances, through other collection efforts reasonably expected to result in repayment or restoration to current status
in the near future. A loan is considered delinquent when a payment has not been made by the contractual due date. Interest income previously accrued but not collected at the date a loan is placed on nonaccrual status is reversed against interest
income. Cash receipts on a nonaccrual loan are applied to principal and interest in accordance with its contractual terms unless full payment of principal is not expected, in which case cash receipts, whether designated as principal or interest,
are applied as a reduction of the carrying value of the loan. A nonaccrual loan is generally returned to accrual status when principal and interest payments are current, full collectability of principal and interest is reasonably assured, and a
consistent record of performance has been demonstrated.
9
The allowance for losses on loans represents management’s best estimate of losses probable in the existing loan portfolio. The allowance for losses on loans is increased by the
provision for losses on loans charged to expense and reduced by loans charged off, net of recoveries. Loans are charged off in the period deemed uncollectible, based on management’s analysis of expected cash flows (for non-collateral dependent
loans) or collateral value (for collateral-dependent loans). Subsequent recoveries of loans previously charged off, if any, are credited to the allowance when received. The provision for losses on loans is determined based on management’s
assessment of several factors: reviews and evaluations of specific loans, changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and the related impact on specific borrowers and industry groups, historical loan loss
experience, the level of classified and nonperforming loans and the results of regulatory examinations.
Loans are considered impaired if, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest
when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Depending on a particular loan’s circumstances, we measure impairment of a loan based upon either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective
interest rate, the loan’s observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell if the loan is collateral dependent. Valuation allowances are established for collateral-dependent impaired loans for the difference
between the loan amount and fair value of collateral less estimated selling costs. For impaired loans that are not collateral dependent, a valuation allowance is established for the difference between the loan amount and the present value of
expected future cash flows discounted at the historical effective interest rate or the observable market price of the loan. Impairment losses are recognized through an increase in the required allowance for loan losses. Cash receipts on loans
deemed impaired are recorded based on the loan’s separate status as a nonaccrual loan or an accrual status loan.
Some loans are accounted for in accordance with ASC 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. For these loans (“purchased credit impaired loans”),
the Company recorded a fair value discount and began carrying them at book value less their face amount (see Note 4). For these loans, we determined the contractual amount and timing of undiscounted principal and interest payments (the
“undiscounted contractual cash flows”), and estimated the amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal and interest payments, including expected prepayments (the “undiscounted expected cash flows”). Under acquired impaired loan accounting,
the difference between the undiscounted contractual cash flows and the undiscounted expected cash flows is the nonaccretable difference. The nonaccretable difference is an estimate of the loss exposure of principal and interest related to the
purchased credit impaired loans, and the amount is subject to change over time based on the performance of the loans. The carrying value of purchased credit impaired loans is initially determined as the discounted expected cash flows. The excess of
expected cash flows at acquisition over the initial fair value of the purchased credit impaired loans is referred to as the “accretable yield” and is recorded as interest income over the estimated life of the acquired loans using the level-yield
method, if the timing and amount of the future cash flows is reasonably estimable. The carrying value of purchased credit impaired loans is reduced by payments received, both principal and interest, and increased by the portion of the accretable
yield recognized as interest income. Subsequent to acquisition, the Company evaluates the purchased credit impaired loans on a quarterly basis. Increases in expected cash flows compared to those previously estimated increase the accretable yield
and are recognized as interest income prospectively. Decreases in expected cash flows compared to those previously estimated decrease the accretable yield and may result in the establishment of an allowance for loan losses and a provision for loan
losses. Purchased credit impaired loans are generally considered accruing and performing loans, as the loans accrete interest income over the estimated life of the loan when expected cash flows are reasonably estimable. Accordingly, purchased
credit impaired loans that are contractually past due are still considered to be accruing and performing as long as there is an expectation that the estimated cash flows will be received. If the timing and amount of cash flows is not reasonably
estimable, the loans may be classified as nonaccrual loans.
Loan fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred, and the net fee or cost is recognized as an adjustment to interest income using the interest method over the
contractual life of the loans.
Foreclosed Real Estate. Real estate acquired by foreclosure or by deed in lieu of foreclosure is initially recorded at fair value less
estimated selling costs, establishing a new cost basis. Costs for development and improvement of the property are capitalized.
10
Valuations are periodically performed by management, and an allowance for losses is established by a charge to operations if the carrying value of a property exceeds its estimated fair
value, less estimated selling costs.
Loans to facilitate the sale of real estate acquired in foreclosure are discounted if made at less than market rates. Discounts are amortized over the fixed interest period of each
loan using the interest method.
Premises and Equipment. Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and include expenditures for major betterments
and renewals. Maintenance, repairs, and minor renewals are expensed as incurred. When property is retired or sold, the retired asset and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss taken into
income. The Company reviews property and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment loss
recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the assets.
Depreciation is computed by use of straight-line and accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Estimated lives are generally seven to forty years for premises,
three to seven years for equipment, and three years for software.
Bank Owned Life Insurance. Bank owned life insurance policies are reflected in the consolidated balance sheets at the estimated cash surrender
value. Changes in the cash surrender value of these policies, as well as a portion of the insurance proceeds received, are recorded in noninterest income in the consolidated statements of income.
Goodwill. The Company’s goodwill is evaluated annually for impairment or more frequently if impairment indicators are present. A qualitative
assessment is performed to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not the fair value is less than the carrying amount, including goodwill. If, based on the evaluation, it is
determined to be more likely than not that the fair value is less than the carrying value, then goodwill is tested further for impairment. If the implied fair value of goodwill is lower than its carrying amount, a goodwill impairment is indicated
and goodwill is written down to its implied fair value. Subsequent increases in goodwill value are not recognized in the financial statements. As of June 30, 2019, there was no impairment indicated, and the Company believes there continues to be
no impairment of goodwill at September 30, 2019.
Intangible Assets. The Company’s intangible assets at September 30, 2019 included gross core deposit intangibles of $14.7 million with $7.3
million accumulated amortization, gross other identifiable intangibles of $3.8 million with accumulated amortization of $3.8 million, and FHLB mortgage servicing rights of $1.4 million. At June 30, 2019, the Company’s intangible assets included
gross core deposit intangibles of $14.7 million with $6.9 million accumulated amortization, gross other identifiable intangibles of $3.8 million with accumulated amortization of $3.8 million, and FHLB mortgage servicing rights of $1.5 million. The
Company’s core deposit intangible assets are being amortized using the straight line method, over periods ranging from five to seven years, with amortization expense expected to be approximately $1.3 million in the remainder of fiscal 2020, $1.3
million in fiscal 2021 through fiscal 2024, and $1.0 million in total thereafter. As of June 30, 2019, there was no impairment indicated, and the Company believes there continues to be no impairment of other intangible assets at September 30, 2019.
Income Taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with income tax accounting guidance (ASC 740, Income Taxes). The income tax
accounting guidance results in two components of income tax expense: current and deferred. Current income tax expense reflects taxes to be paid or refunded for the current period by applying the provisions of the enacted tax law to the taxable
income or excess of deductions over revenues. The Company determines deferred income taxes using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is based on the tax effects of the differences
between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and enacted changes in tax rates and laws are recognized in the period in which they occur.
Deferred income tax expense results from changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities between periods. Deferred tax assets are recognized if it is more likely than not, based on the
technical merits, that the tax position will be realized or sustained upon examination. The term more likely than not means a likelihood of more than 50 percent; the terms examined and upon examination also include resolution of the related appeals
or litigation processes, if any. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is initially and subsequently measured
11
as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant
information. The determination of whether or not a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold considers the facts, circumstances, and information available at the reporting date and is subject to management’s judgment.
Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of evidence available, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties on income taxes as a component of income tax expense.
The Company files consolidated income tax returns with its subsidiaries.
Incentive Plan. The Company accounts for its Management and Recognition Plan (MRP) and Equity Incentive
Plan (EIP) in accordance with ASC 718, “Share-Based Payment.” Compensation expense is based on the market price of the Company’s stock on the date the shares are granted and is recorded over the vesting period. The difference between the grant date
fair value and the fair value on the date the shares are considered earned represents a tax benefit to the Company that is recorded as an adjustment to income tax expense.
Outside Directors’ Retirement. The Bank adopted a directors’ retirement plan in April 1994 for
outside directors. The directors’ retirement plan provides that each non-employee director (participant) shall receive, upon termination of service on the Board on or after age 60, other than termination for cause, a benefit in equal annual
installments over a five year period. The benefit will be based upon the product of the participant’s vesting percentage and the total Board fees paid to the participant during the calendar year preceding termination of service on the Board. The
vesting percentage shall be determined based upon the participant’s years of service on the Board.
In the event that the participant dies before collecting any or all of the benefits, the Bank shall pay the participant’s beneficiary. No benefits shall be payable to anyone other than
the beneficiary, and shall terminate on the death of the beneficiary.
Stock Options. Compensation cost is measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity instruments issued, and recognized over the
vesting period during which an employee provides service in exchange for the award.
Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per share available to common stockholders is computed using the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share available to common stockholders includes the effect of all weighted-average dilutive potential common shares (stock options) outstanding during each period.
Comprehensive Income. Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income (loss), net of applicable income taxes. Other
comprehensive income (loss) includes unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on available-for-sale securities, unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on available-for-sale securities for which a portion of an other-than-temporary impairment has been
recognized in income, and changes in the funded status of defined benefit pension plans.
Transfers Between Fair Value Hierarchy Levels. Transfers in and out of Level 1 (quoted market prices), Level 2 (other significant observable
inputs) and Level 3 (significant unobservable inputs) are recognized on the period ending date.
The following paragraphs summarize the impact of new accounting pronouncements:
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) - Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13
modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820. The amendments in this update remove disclosures that no longer are considered cost beneficial, modify/clarify the specific requirements of certain disclosures, and add
disclosure requirements identified as relevant. ASU 2018-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for certain removed and modified disclosures, and is not expected to have a significant
impact on our financial statements.
12
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326). The Update amends guidance on reporting credit losses for assets held at amortized cost
basis and available for sale debt securities. For assets held at amortized cost basis, Topic 326 eliminates the probable initial recognition threshold in current GAAP and, instead, requires an entity to reflect its current estimate of all expected
credit losses. The Update affects loans, debt securities, trade receivables, net investments in leases, off balance sheet credit exposures, and any other financial assets not excluded from the scope that have the contractual right to receive cash.
For public companies, the ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is available beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within
those fiscal years. Adoption will be applied on a modified retrospective basis, through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings. The Company formed a working group of key personnel responsible for the allowance for loan losses estimate
and initiated its evaluation of the data and systems requirements of adoption of the Update. The group determined that purchasing third party software would be the most effective method to comply with the requirements, evaluated several outside
vendors, and made a vendor recommendation that was approved by the Board. Model validation and data testing using existing ALLL methodology have been completed. Parallel testing of the new methodology compared to the current methodology will be
performed throughout fiscal year 2020 and the Company continues to evaluate the impact of adopting the new guidance. We expect to recognize a one-time cumulative effect adjustment to the allowance for loan losses as of the beginning of the first
reporting period in which the new standard is effective, which for the Company will be the three-month period ending September 30, 2020, but cannot yet determine the overall impact of the new guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements, or the exact amount of any such one-time adjustment.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases,” to revise the accounting related to lease accounting. Under the new guidance, a lessee is required to record a right-of-use
(ROU) asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. The Update was effective for the Company July 1, 2019. Adoption of the standard allows the use of a modified retrospective transition
approach for all periods presented at the time of adoption. Based on the Company’s leases outstanding at September 30, 2019, which included five leased properties and numerous office equipment leases, the adoption of the new standard did not have
a material impact on our consolidated statements of financial condition or our consolidated statements of income, although an increase to assets and liabilities occurred at the time of adoption. In the first quarter of 2020, the Company recognized
a ROU asset and corresponding lease liability for all leases of approximately $2.0 million based on the lease portfolio at that time. The Company’s new leases, lease terminations, and lease modifications and renewals will impact the amount of ROU
asset and corresponding lease liability recognized. The Company’s leases are all currently “operating leases” as defined in the Update; therefore, no material change in the income statement presentation of lease expense is anticipated.
Note 3: Securities
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and approximate fair value of securities available for sale consisted of the following:
September 30, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||
Gross
|
Gross
|
Estimated
|
||||||||||||||
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
|||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Value
|
||||||||||||
Investment and mortgage backed securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs)
|
$
|
5,038
|
$
|
1
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
$
|
5,031
|
|||||||
State and political subdivisions
|
40,966
|
852
|
(33
|
)
|
41,785
|
|||||||||||
Other securities
|
5,176
|
72
|
(214
|
)
|
5,034
|
|||||||||||
Mortgage-backed GSE residential
|
117,908
|
1,579
|
(331
|
)
|
119,156
|
|||||||||||
Total investments and mortgage-backed securities
|
$
|
169,088
|
$
|
2,504
|
$
|
(586
|
)
|
$
|
171,006
|
|||||||
13
June 30, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||
Gross
|
Gross
|
Estimated
|
||||||||||||||
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
|||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Value
|
||||||||||||
Investment and mortgage backed securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs)
|
$
|
7,284
|
$
|
1
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
$
|
7,270
|
|||||||
State and political subdivisions
|
42,123
|
728
|
(68
|
)
|
42,783
|
|||||||||||
Other securities
|
5,176
|
75
|
(198
|
)
|
5,053
|
|||||||||||
Mortgage-backed GSE residential
|
109,297
|
1,449
|
(317
|
)
|
110,429
|
|||||||||||
Total investments and mortgage-backed securities
|
$
|
163,880
|
$
|
2,253
|
$
|
(598
|
)
|
$
|
165,535
|
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment and mortgage-backed securities, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual
maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without penalties.
September 30, 2019
|
||||||||
Amortized
|
Estimated
|
|||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Cost
|
Fair Value
|
||||||
Within one year
|
$
|
4,511
|
$
|
4,511
|
||||
After one year but less than five years
|
9,749
|
9,799
|
||||||
After five years but less than ten years
|
18,017
|
18,298
|
||||||
After ten years
|
18,903
|
19,242
|
||||||
Total investment securities
|
51,180
|
51,850
|
||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
117,908
|
119,156
|
||||||
Total investments and mortgage-backed securities
|
$
|
169,088
|
$
|
171,006
|
The carrying value of investment and mortgage-backed securities pledged as collateral to secure public deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase amounted to $114.2
million at September 30, 2019 and $143.7 million at June 30, 2019. The securities pledged consist of marketable securities, including $2.3 million and $5.6 million of U.S. Government and Federal Agency Obligations, $27.1 million and $47.3 million
of Mortgage-Backed Securities, $54.2 million and $55.7 million of Collateralized Mortgage Obligations, $30.4 million and $34.9 million of State and Political Subdivisions Obligations, and $200,000 and $300,000 of Other Securities at September 30
and June 30, 2019, respectively.
The following tables show our investments’ gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a
continuous unrealized loss position at September 30 and June 30, 2019:
September 30, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 months
|
12 months or more
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value
|
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
Losses
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
3,489
|
$
|
8
|
$
|
3,489
|
$
|
8
|
||||||||||||
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
|
2,877
|
14
|
2,585
|
19
|
5,462
|
33
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other securities
|
-
|
-
|
966
|
214
|
966
|
214
|
||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
29,390
|
185
|
11,783
|
146
|
41,173
|
331
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total investments and mortgage-backed securities
|
$
|
32,267
|
$
|
199
|
$
|
18,823
|
$
|
387
|
$
|
51,090
|
$
|
586
|
||||||||||||
June 30, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 months
|
12 months or more
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value
|
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
Losses
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
6,969
|
$
|
15
|
$
|
6,969
|
$
|
15
|
||||||||||||
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
|
-
|
-
|
8,531
|
68
|
8,531
|
68
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other securities
|
-
|
-
|
985
|
198
|
985
|
198
|
||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
1,175
|
1
|
34,148
|
316
|
35,323
|
317
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total investments and mortgage-backed securities
|
$
|
1,175
|
$
|
1
|
$
|
50,633
|
$
|
597
|
$
|
51,808
|
$
|
598
|
14
Other securities. At September 30, 2019, there were two pooled trust preferred securities with an estimated fair value of $764,000 and
unrealized losses of $209,000 in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or more. These unrealized losses were primarily due to the long-term nature of the pooled trust preferred securities and a reduced demand for these securities,
and concerns regarding the financial institutions that issued the underlying trust preferred securities.
The September 30, 2019, cash flow analysis for these two securities indicated it is probable the Company will receive all contracted principal and related interest projected. The
cash flow analysis used in making this determination was based on anticipated default, recovery, and prepayment rates, and the resulting cash flows were discounted based on the yield spread anticipated at the time the securities were purchased.
Other inputs include the actual collateral attributes, which include credit ratings and other performance indicators of the underlying financial institutions, including profitability, capital ratios, and asset quality. Assumptions for these two
securities included prepayments averaging 1.5 percent, annually, annual defaults averaging 50 basis points, and a recovery rate averaging 10 percent of gross defaults, lagged two years.
One of these two securities has continued to receive cash interest payments in full since our purchase; the other security received principal-in-kind (PIK), in lieu of cash interest,
for a period of time following the recession and financial crisis which began in 2008, but resumed cash interest payments during fiscal 2014. Our cash flow analysis indicates that cash interest payments are expected to continue for both securities.
Because the Company does not intend to sell these securities and it is not more-likely-than-not that the Company will be required to sell these securities prior to recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, the Company does not
consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2019.
The Company does not believe any other individual unrealized loss as of September 30, 2019, represents other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI). However, the Company could be required
to recognize OTTI losses in future periods with respect to its available for sale investment securities portfolio. The amount and timing of any required OTTI will depend on the decline in the underlying cash flows of the securities. Should the
impairment of any of these securities become other-than-temporary, the cost basis of the investment will be reduced and the resulting loss recognized in the period the OTTI is identified.
Credit losses recognized on investments. During fiscal 2009, the Company adopted ASC 820, formerly FASB Staff Position 157-4, “Determining
Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly.” There were no credit losses recognized in income and other losses or recorded in other
comprehensive income (loss) for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018.
Note 4: Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
Classes of loans are summarized as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
|
September 30, 2019
|
June 30, 2019
|
||||||
Real Estate Loans:
|
||||||||
Residential
|
$
|
489,347
|
$
|
491,992
|
||||
Construction
|
125,724
|
123,287
|
||||||
Commercial
|
839,729
|
840,777
|
||||||
Consumer loans
|
101,117
|
97,534
|
||||||
Commercial loans
|
375,728
|
355,874
|
||||||
1,931,645
|
1,909,464
|
|||||||
Loans in process
|
(36,435
|
)
|
(43,153
|
)
|
||||
Deferred loan fees, net
|
(3
|
)
|
(3
|
)
|
||||
Allowance for loan losses
|
(20,710
|
)
|
(19,903
|
)
|
||||
Total loans
|
$
|
1,874,497
|
$
|
1,846,405
|
15
The Company’s lending activities consist of origination of loans secured by mortgages on one- to four-family residences and commercial and agricultural real estate, construction
loans on residential and commercial properties, commercial and agricultural business loans and consumer loans. The Company has also occasionally purchased loan participation interests originated by other lenders and secured by properties generally
located in the states of Missouri and Arkansas.
Residential Mortgage Lending. The Company actively originates loans for the acquisition or refinance of one- to
four-family residences. This category includes both fixed-rate and adjustable-rate mortgage (“ARM”) loans amortizing over periods of up to 30 years, and the properties securing such loans may be owner-occupied or non-owner-occupied. Single-family
residential loans do not generally exceed 90% of the lower of the appraised value or purchase price of the secured property. Substantially all of the one- to four-family residential mortgage originations in the Company’s portfolio are located
within the Company’s primary lending area.
The Company also originates loans secured by multi-family residential properties that are often located outside the Company’s primary lending area but made to
borrowers who operate within our primary market area. The majority of the multi-family residential loans that are originated by the Bank are amortized over periods generally up to 25 years, with balloon maturities typically up to ten years. Both
fixed and adjustable interest rates are offered and it is typical for the Company to include an interest rate “floor” and “ceiling” in the loan agreement. Generally, multi-family residential loans do not exceed 85% of the lower of the appraised
value or purchase price of the secured property.
Commercial Real Estate Lending. The Company actively originates loans secured by commercial real estate including land
(improved, unimproved, and farmland), strip shopping centers, retail establishments and other businesses. These properties are typically owned and operated by borrowers headquartered within the Company’s primary lending area, however, the property
may be located outside our primary lending area.
Most commercial real estate loans originated by the Company generally are based on amortization schedules of up to 25 years with monthly principal and interest
payments. Generally, the interest rate received on these loans is fixed for a maturity for up to seven years, with a balloon payment due at maturity. Alternatively, for some loans, the interest rate adjusts at least annually after an initial period
up to seven years. The Company typically includes an interest rate “floor” in the loan agreement. Generally, improved commercial real estate loan amounts do not exceed 80% of the lower of the appraised value or the purchase price of the secured
property. Agricultural real estate terms offered differ slightly, with amortization schedules of up to 25 years with an 80% loan-to-value ratio, or 30 years with a 75% loan-to-value ratio.
Construction Lending. The Company originates real estate loans secured by property or land that is under construction or
development. Construction loans originated by the Company are generally secured by mortgage loans for the construction of owner occupied residential real estate or to finance speculative construction secured by residential real estate, land
development, or owner-operated or non-owner occupied commercial real estate. During construction, these loans typically require monthly interest-only payments and have maturities ranging from six to twelve months. Once construction is completed,
permanent construction loans may be converted to monthly payments using amortization schedules of up to 30 years on residential and generally up to 25 years on commercial real estate.
While the Company typically utilizes maturity periods ranging from 6 to 12 months to closely monitor the inherent risks associated with construction loans for these loans, weather
conditions, change orders, availability of materials and/or labor, and other factors may contribute to the lengthening of a project, thus necessitating the need to renew the construction loan at the balloon maturity. Such extensions are typically
executed in incremental three month periods to facilitate project completion. The Company’s average term of construction loans is approximately eight months. During construction, loans typically require monthly interest only payments which may
allow the Company an opportunity to monitor for early signs of financial difficulty should the borrower fail to make a required monthly payment. Additionally, during the construction phase, the Company typically performs interim inspections which
further allow the Company opportunity to assess risk. At September 30, 2019, construction loans outstanding included 61 loans, totaling $29.5 million, for which a modification had been agreed to. At June 30, 2019,
16
construction loans outstanding included 59 loans, totaling $27.2 million, for which a modification had been agreed to. All modifications were solely for the purpose of extending the
maturity date due to conditions described above. None of these modifications were executed due to financial difficulty on the part of the borrower and, therefore, were not accounted for as TDRs.
Consumer Lending. The Company offers a variety of secured consumer loans, including home equity, direct and indirect automobile loans, second
mortgages, mobile home loans and loans secured by deposits. The Company originates substantially all of its consumer loans in its primary lending area. Usually, consumer loans are typically originated with fixed rates for terms of up to five years,
with the exception of home equity lines of credit, which are typically originated with adjustable rates, tied to the prime rate of interest and are for a period of ten years.
Home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) are secured with a deed of trust and are issued up to 100% of the appraised or assessed value of the property securing the line of credit, less
the outstanding balance on the first mortgage. Interest rates on the HELOCs are generally adjustable and based upon the loan-to-value ratio of the property, with better rates
given to borrowers with more equity.
Automobile loans originated by the Company include both direct loans and a smaller amount of loans originated by auto dealers. The Company generally pays a negotiated fee back to the
dealer for indirect loans. Typically, automobile loans are made for terms of up to 60 months for new and used vehicles. Loans secured by automobiles have fixed rates and are generally made in amounts up to 100% of the purchase price of the vehicle.
Commercial Business Lending. The Company’s commercial business lending activities encompass loans with a variety of purposes and security,
including loans to finance accounts receivable, inventory, equipment and operating lines of credit, including agricultural production and equipment loans. The Company offers both fixed and adjustable rate commercial business loans. Generally,
commercial loans secured by fixed assets are amortized over periods up to five years, while commercial operating lines of credit or agricultural production lines are generally for a one year period.
The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans (excluding loans in process and deferred loan
fees) based on portfolio segment and impairment methods as of September 30 and June 30, 2019, and activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018:
17
At period end and for the three months ended September 30, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
Construction
|
Commercial
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Real Estate
|
Real Estate
|
Real Estate
|
Consumer
|
Commercial
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period
|
$
|
3,706
|
$
|
1,365
|
$
|
9,399
|
$
|
1,046
|
$
|
4,387
|
$
|
19,903
|
||||||||||||
Provision charged to expense
|
(134
|
)
|
174
|
376
|
96
|
384
|
896
|
|||||||||||||||||
Losses charged off
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(72
|
)
|
(35
|
)
|
(107
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Recoveries
|
-
|
-
|
14
|
4
|
-
|
18
|
||||||||||||||||||
Balance, end of period
|
$
|
3,572
|
$
|
1,539
|
$
|
9,789
|
$
|
1,074
|
$
|
4,736
|
$
|
20,710
|
||||||||||||
Ending Balance: individually
evaluated for impairment |
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Ending Balance: collectively
evaluated for impairment |
$
|
3,572
|
$
|
1,539
|
$
|
9,789
|
$
|
1,074
|
$
|
4,736
|
$
|
20,710
|
||||||||||||
Ending Balance: loans acquired
with deteriorated credit quality |
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending Balance: individually
evaluated for impairment |
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Ending Balance: collectively
evaluated for impairment |
$
|
487,680
|
$
|
87,983
|
$
|
823,649
|
$
|
101,117
|
$
|
370,298
|
$
|
1,870,727
|
||||||||||||
Ending Balance: loans acquired
with deteriorated credit quality |
$
|
1,667
|
$
|
1,306
|
$
|
16,080
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
5,430
|
$
|
24,483
|
At period end and for the three months ended September 30, 2018
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
Construction
|
Commercial
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Real Estate
|
Real Estate
|
Real Estate
|
Consumer
|
Commercial
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period
|
$
|
3,226
|
$
|
1,097
|
$
|
8,793
|
$
|
902
|
$
|
4,196
|
$
|
18,214
|
||||||||||||
Provision charged to expense
|
122
|
196
|
35
|
92
|
237
|
682
|
||||||||||||||||||
Losses charged off
|
-
|
-
|
(95
|
)
|
(17
|
)
|
-
|
(112
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Recoveries
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
4
|
1
|
6
|
||||||||||||||||||
Balance, end of period
|
$
|
3,349
|
$
|
1,293
|
$
|
8,733
|
$
|
981
|
$
|
4,434
|
$
|
18,790
|
||||||||||||
Ending Balance: individually
evaluated for impairment |
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Ending Balance: collectively
evaluated for impairment |
$
|
3,349
|
$
|
1,293
|
$
|
8,733
|
$
|
981
|
$
|
4,434
|
$
|
18,790
|
||||||||||||
Ending Balance: loans acquired
with deteriorated credit quality |
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
At June 30, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
Construction
|
Commercial
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Real Estate
|
Real Estate
|
Real Estate
|
Consumer
|
Commercial
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, end of period
|
$
|
3,706
|
$
|
1,365
|
$
|
9,399
|
$
|
1,046
|
$
|
4,387
|
$
|
19,903
|
||||||||||||
Ending Balance: individually
evaluated for impairment |
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Ending Balance: collectively
evaluated for impairment |
$
|
3,706
|
$
|
1,365
|
$
|
9,399
|
$
|
1,046
|
$
|
4,387
|
$
|
19,903
|
||||||||||||
Ending Balance: loans acquired
with deteriorated credit quality |
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending Balance: individually
evaluated for impairment |
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Ending Balance: collectively
evaluated for impairment |
$
|
490,307
|
$
|
78,826
|
$
|
821,415
|
$
|
97,534
|
$
|
349,681
|
$
|
1,837,763
|
||||||||||||
Ending Balance: loans acquired
with deteriorated credit quality |
$
|
1,685
|
$
|
1,308
|
$
|
19,362
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
6,193
|
$
|
28,548
|
18
Management’s opinion as to the ultimate collectability of loans is subject to estimates regarding future cash flows from operations and the value of property, real and personal,
pledged as collateral. These estimates are affected by changing economic conditions and the economic prospects of borrowers.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level that, in management’s judgment, is adequate to cover probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet
date. The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when an amount is determined to be uncollectible,
based on management’s analysis of expected cash flow (for non-collateral-dependent loans) or collateral value (for collateral-dependent loans). Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.
The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectability of the loans in light of historical
experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective
as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
The allowance consists of allocated and general components. The allocated component relates to loans that are classified as impaired. For those loans that are classified as impaired,
an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan.
Under the Company’s allowance methodology, loans are first segmented into 1) those comprising large groups of homogeneous loans, which are collectively evaluated for impairment, and
2) all other loans which are individually evaluated. Those loans in the second category are further segmented utilizing a defined grading system which involves categorizing loans by severity of risk based on conditions that may affect the ability
of the borrowers to repay their debt, such as current financial information, collateral valuations, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current trends. The loans subject to credit classification represent
the portion of the portfolio subject to the greatest credit risk and where adjustments to the allowance for losses on loans as a result of provisions and charge offs are most likely to have a significant impact on operations.
A periodic review of selected credits (based on loan size and type) is conducted to identify loans with heightened risk or probable losses and to assign risk grades. The primary
responsibility for this review rests with loan administration personnel. This review is supplemented with periodic examinations of both selected credits and the credit review process by the Company’s internal audit function and applicable
regulatory agencies. The information from these reviews assists management in the timely identification of problems and potential problems and provides a basis for deciding whether the credit represents a probable loss or risk that should be
recognized.
The Company considers, as the primary quantitative factor in its allowance methodology, average net charge offs over the most recent twelve-month period. The Company also reviews
average net charge offs over the most recent five-year period.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the scheduled payments of principal or interest will not be able to be collected when
due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due.
Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration
all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.
Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and agricultural loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price or the fair value of
the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
19
Groups of loans with similar risk characteristics are collectively evaluated for impairment based on the group’s historical loss experience adjusted for changes in trends, conditions
and other relevant factors that affect repayment of the loans. Accordingly, individual consumer and residential loans are not separately identified for impairment measurements, unless such loans are the subject of a restructuring agreement due to
financial difficulties of the borrower.
The general component covers non classified loans and is based on historical charge-off experience and expected loss given the internal risk rating process. The loan portfolio is
stratified into homogeneous groups of loans that possess similar loss characteristics and an appropriate loss ratio adjusted for qualitative factors is applied to the homogeneous pools of loans to estimate the incurred losses in the loan portfolio.
Included in the Company’s loan portfolio are certain loans accounted for in accordance with ASC 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. These
loans were written down at acquisition to an amount estimated to be collectible. As a result, certain ratios regarding the Company’s loan portfolio and credit quality cannot be used to compare the Company to peer companies or to compare the
Company’s current credit quality to prior periods. The ratios particularly affected by accounting under ASC 310-30 include the allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans, nonaccrual loans, and nonperforming assets, and nonaccrual loans and
nonperforming loans as a percentage of total loans.
The following tables present the credit risk profile of the Company’s loan portfolio (excluding loans in process and deferred loan fees) based on rating category and payment activity
as of September 30 and June 30, 2019. These tables include purchased credit impaired loans, which are reported according to risk categorization after acquisition based on the Company’s standards for such classification:
September 30, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
Construction
|
Commercial
|
||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Real Estate
|
Real Estate
|
Real Estate
|
Consumer
|
Commercial
|
|||||||||||||||
Pass
|
$
|
481,808
|
$
|
89,289
|
$
|
802,243
|
$
|
100,742
|
$
|
363,739
|
||||||||||
Watch
|
1,020
|
-
|
20,893
|
167
|
5,928
|
|||||||||||||||
Special Mention
|
103
|
-
|
3,438
|
26
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Substandard
|
6,416
|
-
|
13,155
|
182
|
6,061
|
|||||||||||||||
Doubtful
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
489,347
|
$
|
89,289
|
$
|
839,729
|
$
|
101,117
|
$
|
375,728
|
June 30, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
Construction
|
Commercial
|
||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Real Estate
|
Real Estate
|
Real Estate
|
Consumer
|
Commercial
|
|||||||||||||||
Pass
|
$
|
482,869
|
$
|
80,134
|
$
|
802,479
|
$
|
97,012
|
$
|
341,069
|
||||||||||
Watch
|
1,236
|
-
|
21,693
|
170
|
7,802
|
|||||||||||||||
Special Mention
|
103
|
-
|
3,463
|
26
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Substandard
|
7,784
|
-
|
13,142
|
291
|
7,003
|
|||||||||||||||
Doubtful
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
35
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
491,992
|
$
|
80,134
|
$
|
840,777
|
$
|
97,534
|
$
|
355,874
|
The above amounts include purchased credit impaired loans. At September 30, 2019, purchased credited impaired loans comprised $6.8 million of credits rated “Pass” $10.7 million of
credits rated “Watch” none rated “Special Mention” $7.0 million of credits rated “Substandard” and none rated “Doubtful”. At June 30, 2019, purchased credit impaired loans accounted for $6.9 million of credits rated “Pass” $10.4 million of
credits rated “Watch” none rated “Special Mention” $11.2 million of credits rated “Substandard” and none rated “Doubtful”.
Credit Quality Indicators. The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers
to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the
loans as to credit risk. This analysis is performed on all loans at origination, and is updated on a quarterly basis for loans risk rated Special Mention, Substandard, or Doubtful. In addition, lending relationships of $2 million or more,
exclusive of any consumer or owner-occupied residential loan, are subject to an annual credit analysis which is prepared by the loan administration department and presented to a loan committee with appropriate lending authority. A sample of lending
relationships in excess of $1 million (exclusive of single-family residential real estate loans) are subject to an independent loan review annually, in order to verify risk ratings.
20
The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:
Watch – Loans classified as watch exhibit weaknesses that require more than usual monitoring. Issues may include
deteriorating financial condition, payments made after due date but within 30 days, adverse industry conditions or management problems.
Special Mention – Loans classified as special mention exhibit signs of further deterioration but still generally make
payments within 30 days. This is a transitional rating and loans should typically not be rated Special Mention for more than 12 months
Substandard – Loans classified as substandard possess weaknesses that jeopardize the ultimate collection of the principal
and interest outstanding. These loans exhibit continued financial losses, ongoing delinquency, overall poor financial condition, and insufficient collateral. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some
loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
Doubtful – Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses of substandard loans, and have deteriorated to the level
that there is a high probability of substantial loss.
Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be Pass
rated loans.
The following tables present the Company’s loan portfolio aging analysis (excluding loans in process and deferred loan fees) as of September 30 and June 30,
2019. These tables include purchased credit impaired loans, which are reported according to aging analysis after acquisition based on the Company’s standards for such classification:
September 30, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greater Than
|
Greater Than 90
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30-59 Days
|
60-89 Days
|
90 Days
|
Total
|
Total Loans
|
Days Past Due
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Past Due
|
Past Due
|
Past Due
|
Past Due
|
Current
|
Receivable
|
and Accruing
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate Loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$
|
1,180
|
$
|
1,300
|
$
|
2,161
|
$
|
4,641
|
$
|
484,706
|
$
|
489,347
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||||||||
Construction
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
89,289
|
89,289
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
854
|
16
|
2,841
|
3,711
|
836,018
|
839,729
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans
|
325
|
85
|
164
|
574
|
100,543
|
101,117
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans
|
754
|
5
|
172
|
931
|
374,797
|
375,728
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans
|
$
|
3,113
|
$
|
1,406
|
$
|
5,338
|
$
|
9,857
|
$
|
1,885,353
|
$
|
1,895,210
|
$
|
-
|
June 30, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greater Than
|
Greater Than 90
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30-59 Days
|
60-89 Days
|
90 Days
|
Total
|
Total Loans
|
Days Past Due
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Past Due
|
Past Due
|
Past Due
|
Past Due
|
Current
|
Receivable
|
and Accruing
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate Loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$
|
227
|
$
|
1,054
|
$
|
1,714
|
$
|
2,995
|
$
|
488,997
|
$
|
491,992
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||||||||
Construction
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
80,134
|
80,134
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
296
|
1
|
5,617
|
5,914
|
834,863
|
840,777
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans
|
128
|
46
|
176
|
350
|
97,184
|
97,534
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans
|
424
|
25
|
1,902
|
2,351
|
353,523
|
355,874
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans
|
$
|
1,075
|
$
|
1,126
|
$
|
9,409
|
$
|
11,610
|
$
|
1,854,701
|
$
|
1,866,311
|
$
|
-
|
At September 30, 2019 there were no purchased credit impaired loans that were greater than 90 days past due. At June 30, 2019 there was one purchased credit
impaired loan with net fair value of $3.1 million that was greater than 90 days past due.
A loan is considered impaired, in accordance with the impairment accounting guidance (ASC 310-10-35-16), when based on current information and events, it is probable the Company will
be unable to collect all amounts due from the borrower in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. Impaired loans include nonperforming loans, as well as performing loans modified in troubled debt restructurings where concessions have
been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. These concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection.
21
The tables below present impaired loans (excluding loans in process and deferred loan fees) as of September 30 and June 30, 2019. These tables include purchased credit impaired
loans. Purchased credit impaired loans are those for which it was deemed probable, at acquisition, that the Company would be unable to collect all contractually required payments receivable. In an instance where, subsequent to the acquisition, the
Company determines it is probable, for a specific loan, that cash flows received will exceed the amount previously expected, the Company will recalculate the amount of accretable yield in order to recognize the improved cash flow expectation as
additional interest income over the remaining life of the loan. These loans, however, will continue to be reported as impaired loans. In an instance where, subsequent to the acquisition, the Company determines it is probable, for a specific loan,
that cash flows received will be less than the amount previously expected, the Company will allocate a specific allowance under the terms of ASC 310-10-35.
September 30, 2019
|
||||||||||||
Recorded
|
Unpaid Principal
|
Specific
|
||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Balance
|
Balance
|
Allowance
|
|||||||||
Loans without a specific valuation allowance:
|
||||||||||||
Residential real estate
|
$
|
4,916
|
$
|
5,152
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Construction real estate
|
1,305
|
1,367
|
-
|
|||||||||
Commercial real estate
|
22,928
|
27,306
|
-
|
|||||||||
Consumer loans
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Commercial loans
|
6,152
|
7,252
|
-
|
|||||||||
Loans with a specific valuation allowance:
|
||||||||||||
Residential real estate
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Construction real estate
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Commercial real estate
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Consumer loans
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Commercial loans
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Total:
|
||||||||||||
Residential real estate
|
$
|
4,916
|
$
|
5,152
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Construction real estate
|
$
|
1,305
|
$
|
1,367
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Commercial real estate
|
$
|
22,928
|
$
|
27,306
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Consumer loans
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Commercial loans
|
$
|
6,152
|
$
|
7,252
|
$
|
-
|
June 30, 2019
|
||||||||||||
Recorded
|
Unpaid Principal
|
Specific
|
||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Balance
|
Balance
|
Allowance
|
|||||||||
Loans without a specific valuation allowance:
|
||||||||||||
Residential real estate
|
$
|
5,104
|
$
|
5,341
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Construction real estate
|
1,330
|
1,419
|
-
|
|||||||||
Commercial real estate
|
26,410
|
31,717
|
-
|
|||||||||
Consumer loans
|
8
|
8
|
-
|
|||||||||
Commercial loans
|
6,999
|
9,187
|
-
|
|||||||||
Loans with a specific valuation allowance:
|
||||||||||||
Residential real estate
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Construction real estate
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Commercial real estate
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Consumer loans
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Commercial loans
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Total:
|
||||||||||||
Residential real estate
|
$
|
5,104
|
$
|
5,341
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Construction real estate
|
$
|
1,330
|
$
|
1,419
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Commercial real estate
|
$
|
26,410
|
$
|
31,717
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Consumer loans
|
$
|
8
|
$
|
8
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Commercial loans
|
$
|
6,999
|
$
|
9,187
|
$
|
-
|
The above amounts include purchased credit impaired loans. At September 30, 2019, purchased credit impaired loans comprised $24.5 million of impaired loans without a specific
valuation allowance. At June 30, 2019, purchased credit impaired loans comprised $28.5 million of impaired loans without a specific valuation allowance.
22
The following tables present information regarding interest income recognized on impaired loans:
For the three-month period ended
|
||||||||
September 30, 2019
|
||||||||
Average
|
||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Investment in
|
Interest Income
|
||||||
Impaired Loans
|
Recognized
|
|||||||
Residential Real Estate
|
$
|
1,677
|
$
|
23
|
||||
Construction Real Estate
|
1,306
|
48
|
||||||
Commercial Real Estate
|
17,721
|
335
|
||||||
Consumer Loans
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Commercial Loans
|
5,812
|
93
|
||||||
Total Loans
|
$
|
26,516
|
$
|
499
|
For the three-month period ended
|
||||||||
September 30, 2018
|
||||||||
Average
|
||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Investment in
|
Interest Income
|
||||||
Impaired Loans
|
Recognized
|
|||||||
Residential Real Estate
|
$
|
2,531
|
$
|
33
|
||||
Construction Real Estate
|
1,297
|
101
|
||||||
Commercial Real Estate
|
7,229
|
370
|
||||||
Consumer Loans
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Commercial Loans
|
1,628
|
616
|
||||||
Total Loans
|
$
|
12,685
|
$
|
1,120
|
Interest income on impaired loans recognized on a cash basis in the three-month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, was immaterial.
For the three-month period ended September 30, 2019, the amount of interest income recorded for impaired loans that represented a change in the present value of cash flows
attributable to the passage of time was approximately $83,000, as compared to $945,000, for the three-month period ended September 30, 2018.
The following table presents the Company’s nonaccrual loans at September 30 and June 30, 2019. Purchased credit impaired loans are placed on nonaccrual status in the event the
Company cannot reasonably estimate cash flows expected to be collected. The table excludes performing troubled debt restructurings.
(dollars in thousands)
|
September 30, 2019
|
June 30, 2019
|
||||||
Residential real estate
|
$
|
5,286
|
$
|
6,404
|
||||
Construction real estate
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Commercial real estate
|
6,968
|
10,876
|
||||||
Consumer loans
|
179
|
309
|
||||||
Commercial loans
|
1,588
|
3,424
|
||||||
Total loans
|
$
|
14,021
|
$
|
21,013
|
The above amounts include purchased credit impaired loans. At September 30 and June 30, 2019, purchased credit impaired loans comprised $889,000 and $4.1 million of nonaccrual
loans, respectively.
Included in certain loan categories in the impaired loans are troubled debt restructurings (TDRs), where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers who have experienced
financial difficulties. These concessions typically result from our loss mitigation activities, and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance, or other actions. Certain TDRs are
classified as nonperforming at the time of restructuring and typically are returned to performing status after considering the borrower’s sustained repayment performance for a reasonable period of at least six months.
When loans and leases are modified into a TDR, the Company evaluates any possible impairment similar to other impaired loans based on the present value of expected future cash flows,
discounted at the contractual interest rate of the original loan or lease agreement, and uses the current fair value of the collateral, less selling costs, for collateral dependent loans. If the Company determines that the value of the modified
loan is less than the recorded
23
investment in the loan (net of previous charge-offs, deferred loan fees or costs, and unamortized premium or discount), impairment is recognized through an allowance estimate or a
charge-off to the allowance. In periods subsequent to modification, the Company evaluates all TDRs, including those that have payment defaults, for possible impairment and recognizes impairment through the allowance.
During the three-month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, certain loans modified were classified as TDRs. They are shown, segregated by class, in the table below:
For the three-month periods ended
|
||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2019
|
September 30, 2018
|
|||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Number of
|
Recorded
|
Number of
|
Recorded
|
||||||||||||
modifications
|
Investment
|
modifications
|
Investment
|
|||||||||||||
Residential real estate
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||||
Construction real estate
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Commercial real estate
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
922
|
||||||||||||
Consumer loans
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Commercial loans
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
69
|
||||||||||||
Total
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
3
|
$
|
991
|
Performing loans classified as TDRs and outstanding at September 30 and June 30, 2019, segregated by class, are shown in the table below. Nonperforming TDRs are shown as nonaccrual
loans.
September 30, 2019
|
June 30, 2019
|
|||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Number of
|
Recorded
|
Number of
|
Recorded
|
||||||||||||
modifications
|
Investment
|
modifications
|
Investment
|
|||||||||||||
Residential real estate
|
11
|
$
|
1,162
|
10
|
$
|
1,130
|
||||||||||
Construction real estate
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Commercial real estate
|
18
|
6,398
|
20
|
6,529
|
||||||||||||
Consumer loans
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Commercial loans
|
9
|
4,872
|
10
|
5,630
|
||||||||||||
Total
|
38
|
$
|
12,432
|
40
|
$
|
13,289
|
The Company may obtain physical possession of real estate collateralizing a residential mortgage loan or home equity loan via foreclosure or in-substance repossession. As of
September 30 and June 30, 2019, the carrying value of foreclosed residential real estate properties as a result of obtaining physical possession was $421,000 and $752,000, respectively. In addition, as of September 30 and June 30, 2019, the Company
had residential mortgage loans and home equity loans with a carrying value of $898,000 and $493,000, respectively, collateralized by residential real estate property for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process.
Note 5: Accounting for Certain Loans Acquired in a Transfer
During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2011, 2015, 2017, and 2019, the Company acquired certain loans which evidenced deterioration of credit quality since origination and for which
it was probable, at acquisition, that all contractually required payments would not be collected.
Loans purchased with evidence of credit deterioration since origination and for which it is probable that all contractually required payments will not be collected are considered to
be credit impaired. Evidence of credit quality deterioration as of the purchase date may include information such as past-due and nonaccrual status, borrower credit scores and recent loan to value percentages. Purchased credit-impaired loans are
accounted for under the accounting guidance for loans and debt securities acquired with deteriorated credit quality (ASC 310-30) and initially measured at fair value, which includes estimated future credit losses expected to be incurred over the
life of the loan. Accordingly, an allowance for credit losses related to these loans is not carried over and recorded at the acquisition date. Management estimated the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition using our internal risk
models, which incorporate the estimate of current key assumptions, such as default rates, severity and prepayment speeds.
24
The carrying amount of those loans is included in the balance sheet amounts of loans receivable at September 30 and June 30, 2019. The amount of these loans is shown below:
(dollars in thousands)
|
September 30, 2019
|
June 30, 2019
|
||||||
Residential real estate
|
$
|
1,904
|
$
|
1,921
|
||||
Construction real estate
|
1,367
|
1,397
|
||||||
Commercial real estate
|
20,458
|
24,669
|
||||||
Consumer loans
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Commercial loans
|
6,529
|
8,381
|
||||||
Outstanding balance
|
$
|
30,258
|
$
|
36,368
|
||||
Carrying amount, net of fair value adjustment of
$5,775 and $7,821 at September 30, 2019 and June 30, 2019, respectively |
$
|
24,483
|
$
|
28,547
|
Accretable yield, or income expected to be collected, is as follows:
For the three-month period ended
|
||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
September 30, 2019
|
September 30, 2018
|
||||||
Balance at beginning of period
|
$
|
220
|
$
|
589
|
||||
Additions
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Accretion
|
(83
|
)
|
(945
|
)
|
||||
Reclassification from nonaccretable difference
|
46
|
865
|
||||||
Disposals
|
-
|
(204
|
)
|
|||||
Balance at end of period
|
$
|
183
|
$
|
305
|
During the three-month periods ended September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, the Company did not increase or reverse the allowance for loan losses related to these purchased
credit impaired loans.
Note 6: Premises and Equipment
Following is a summary of premises and equipment:
(dollars in thousands)
|
September 30, 2019
|
June 30, 2019
|
||||||
Land
|
$
|
12,407
|
$
|
12,414
|
||||
Buildings and improvements
|
54,933
|
54,304
|
||||||
Construction in progress
|
489
|
466
|
||||||
Furniture, fixtures, equipment and software
|
17,506
|
16,514
|
||||||
Automobiles
|
107
|
107
|
||||||
Operating leases ROU asset
|
1,996
|
-
|
||||||
87,438
|
83,805
|
|||||||
Less accumulated depreciation
|
21,958
|
21,078
|
||||||
$
|
65,480
|
$
|
62,727
|
Leases. The Company adopted ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), on July 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective transition approach whereby comparative periods were not
restated. The Company also elected certain relief options under the ASU, including the option not to recognize right of use asset and lease liabilities that arise from short-term leases (leases with terms of twelve months or less). The Company
has five leased properties and numerous office equipment lease agreements in which it is the lessee, with lease terms exceeding twelve months. Adoption of this ASU resulted in the Company recognizing a ROU asset and corresponding lease liability
of $437,000, while entry into a new operating lease agreement during the three-month period ended September 30, 2019, resulted in the recognition of a ROU asset and corresponding lease liability of $1.6 million.
All of the leases are classified as operating leases, and therefore, were previously not recognized on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. With the adoption of ASU 2016-02,
these operating leases are now included as a ROU asset in our premises and equipment line item on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The corresponding lease liability is included in the accounts payable and other liabilities line item on
the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Because these leases are classified as operating leases, the adoption of the new standard did not have a material effect on lease expense on the Company’s consolidated statements of income.
25
ASU 2016-02 also requires certain other accounting elections. The Company elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that qualify, meaning those with terms
under twelve months. ROU assets or lease liabilities are not to be recognized for short-term leases. The calculated amount of the ROU assets and lease liabilities in the table below are impacted by the length of the lease term and the discount
rate used to present value the minimum lease payments. The Company’s lease agreements often include one or more options to renew at the Company’s discretion. If at lease inception, the Company considers the exercising of a renewal option to be
reasonably certain, the Company will include the extended term in the calculation of the ROU asset and lease liability. Regarding the discount rate, the ASU requires the use of the rate implicit in the lease whenever this rate is readily
determinable. As this rate is rarely determinable, the Company utilizes its incremental borrowing rate at lease inception over a similar term. The discount rate utilized was 5%. The expected lease terms range from 18 months to 20 years.
At or For the
|
||||
Three Months Ended
|
||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
September 30, 2019
|
|||
Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
||||
Operating leases right of use asset
|
$
|
1,996
|
||
Operating leases liability
|
$
|
1,996
|
||
Consolidated Statement of Income
|
||||
Operating lease costs classified as occupancy and equipment expense
|
$
|
57
|
||
(includes short-term lease costs)
|
||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
|
||||
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
|
||||
Operating cash flows from operating leases
|
$
|
39
|
||
ROU assets obtained in exchange for operating lease obligations:
|
$
|
2,004
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, lease expense was $57,000 and $26,000, respectively. At September 30, 2019, future expected lease payments for leases with
terms exceeding one year were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
|
||||
2020
|
$
|
116
|
||
2021
|
269
|
|||
2022
|
243
|
|||
2023
|
243
|
|||
2024
|
243
|
|||
2025
|
243
|
|||
Thereafter
|
1,572
|
|||
Future lease payments expected
|
$
|
2,929
|
The Company leases facilities it owns or portions of facilities it owns to other third parties. The Company has determined that all of these lease agreements, in terms of being the
lessor, are classified as operating leases. For the three months period ended September 30, 2019, income recognized from these lessor agreements was $82,000 and was included in net occupancy and equipment expense.
Note 7: Deposits
Deposits are summarized as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
|
September 30, 2019
|
June 30, 2019
|
||||||
Non-interest bearing accounts
|
$
|
208,646
|
$
|
218,889
|
||||
NOW accounts
|
634,855
|
639,219
|
||||||
Money market deposit accounts
|
197,976
|
188,355
|
||||||
Savings accounts
|
163,983
|
167,973
|
||||||
Certificates
|
667,060
|
679,259
|
||||||
Total Deposit Accounts
|
$
|
1,872,520
|
$
|
1,893,695
|
26
Note 8: Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
Three months ended
|
||||||||
September 30,
|
||||||||
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
|
||||||||
Net income available to common shareholders
|
$
|
7,828
|
$
|
6,800
|
||||
Average Common shares – outstanding basic
|
9,232,257
|
8,996,321
|
||||||
Stock options under treasury stock method
|
11,891
|
10,194
|
||||||
Average Common shares – outstanding diluted
|
9,244,148
|
9,006,515
|
||||||
Basic earnings per common share
|
$
|
0.85
|
$
|
0.76
|
||||
Diluted earnings per common share
|
$
|
0.85
|
$
|
0.76
|
At September 30, 2019, 15,500 options outstanding had an exercise price in excess of the market price. At September 30, 2018, no options outstanding had an exercise price in excess
of the market price.
Note 9: Income Taxes
The Company and its subsidiary files income tax returns in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction and various states. The Company is no longer subject to federal and state examinations by tax
authorities for tax years ending June 30, 2015 and before. The Company recognized no interest or penalties related to income taxes.
The Company’s income tax provision is comprised of the following components:
For the three-month periods ended
|
||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
September 30, 2019
|
September 30, 2018
|
||||||
Income taxes
|
||||||||
Current
|
$
|
1,970
|
$
|
1,660
|
||||
Deferred
|
6
|
6
|
||||||
Total income tax provision
|
$
|
1,976
|
$
|
1,666
|
The components of net deferred tax assets are summarized as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
|
September 30, 2019
|
June 30, 2019
|
||||||
Deferred tax assets:
|
||||||||
Provision for losses on loans
|
$
|
4,758
|
$
|
4,601
|
||||
Accrued compensation and benefits
|
493
|
692
|
||||||
NOL carry forwards acquired
|
300
|
199
|
||||||
Minimum Tax Credit
|
130
|
130
|
||||||
Unrealized loss on other real estate
|
51
|
134
|
||||||
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
-
|
255
|
||||||
Losses and credits from LLC's
|
1,236
|
1,206
|
||||||
Total deferred tax assets
|
6,968
|
7,217
|
||||||
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
||||||||
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
176
|
-
|
||||||
Depreciation
|
1,469
|
1,749
|
||||||
FHLB stock dividends
|
120
|
120
|
||||||
Prepaid expenses
|
175
|
313
|
||||||
Unrealized gain on available for sale securities
|
422
|
364
|
||||||
Other
|
60
|
61
|
||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
2,422
|
2,607
|
||||||
Net deferred tax asset
|
$
|
4,546
|
$
|
4,610
|
27
As of September 30, 2019 the Company had approximately $963,000 and $1.7 million in federal and state net operating loss carryforwards, respectively, which were acquired in the July 2009 acquisition of Southern Bank of Commerce, the February 2014 acquisition of Citizens State Bankshares of Bald Knob, Inc., and the August 2014 acquisition of Peoples Service Company. The amount reported is net of the IRC Sec. 382 limitation, or state equivalent, related to utilization of net operating loss carryforwards of acquired corporations. Unless otherwise utilized, the net operating losses will begin to expire in 2027.
A reconciliation of income tax expense at the statutory rate to the Company’s actual income tax is shown below:
For the three-month periods ended
|
||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
September 30, 2019
|
September 30, 2018
|
||||||
Tax at statutory rate
|
$
|
2,059
|
$
|
1,778
|
||||
Increase (reduction) in taxes
resulting from: |
||||||||
Nontaxable municipal income
|
(113
|
)
|
(73
|
)
|
||||
State tax, net of Federal benefit
|
109
|
122
|
||||||
Cash surrender value of
Bank-owned life insurance |
(53
|
)
|
(52
|
)
|
||||
Tax credit benefits
|
-
|
(68
|
)
|
|||||
Other, net
|
(26
|
)
|
(41
|
)
|
||||
Actual provision
|
$
|
1,976
|
$
|
1,666
|
For the three month periods ended September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, income tax expense at the statutory rate was calculated using a 21% annual effective tax rate (AETR).
Tax credit benefits are recognized under the deferral method of accounting for investments in tax credits.
Note 10: 401(k) Retirement Plan
The Bank has a 401(k) retirement plan that covers substantially all eligible employees. The Bank made a safe harbor matching contribution to the Plan of up to 4% of eligible
compensation, depending upon the percentage of eligible pay deferred into the plan by the employee, and also made additional, discretionary profit-sharing contributions for fiscal 2019; for fiscal 2020, the Company has maintained the safe harbor
matching contribution of up to 4%, and expects to continue to make additional, discretionary profit-sharing contributions. During the three-month period ended September 30, 2019, retirement plan expenses recognized for the Plan totaled
approximately $381,000, as compared to $341,000 for the same period of the prior fiscal year. Employee deferrals and safe harbor contributions are fully vested. Profit-sharing or other contributions vest over a period of five years.
Note 11: Subordinated Debt
Southern Missouri Statutory Trust I issued $7.0 million of Floating Rate Capital Securities (the “Trust Preferred Securities”) with a liquidation value of $1,000 per share in March
2004. The securities are due in 30 years, redeemable after five years and bear interest at a floating rate based on LIBOR. At September 30, 2019, the current rate was 4.89%. The securities represent undivided beneficial interests in the trust,
which was established by the Company for the purpose of issuing the securities. The Trust Preferred Securities were sold in a private transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) and have not been
registered under the Act. The securities may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements.
Southern Missouri Statutory Trust I used the proceeds from the sale of the Trust Preferred Securities to purchase Junior Subordinated Debentures of the Company. The Company used its
net proceeds for working capital and investment in its subsidiaries.
In connection with its October 2013 acquisition of Ozarks Legacy Community Financial, Inc. (OLCF), the Company assumed $3.1 million in floating rate junior subordinated debt
securities. The debt securities had been issued in June 2005 by OLCF in connection with the sale of trust preferred securities, bear interest at a floating rate based on LIBOR, are now redeemable at par, and mature in 2035. At September 30, 2019,
the current rate was 4.57%. The carrying value of the debt securities was approximately $2.6 million at September 30 and June 30, 2019.
28
In connection with its August 2014 acquisition of Peoples Service Company, Inc. (PSC), the Company assumed $6.5 million in floating rate junior subordinated debt securities. The debt
securities had been issued in 2005 by PSC’s subsidiary bank holding company, Peoples Banking Company, in connection with the sale of trust preferred securities, bear interest at a floating rate based on LIBOR, are now redeemable at par, and mature
in 2035. At September 30, 2019, the current rate was 3.92%. The carrying value of the debt securities was approximately $5.2 million at September 30 and June 30, 2019.
Note 12: Fair Value Measurements
ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements, defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Topic 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs
when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities
Level 2 Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in active markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities
Level 3 Unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity
that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities
Recurring Measurements. The following table presents the fair value measurements of assets recognized in the accompanying balance sheets
measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at September 30, 2019 and June 30, 2019:
Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2019, Using:
|
||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
|
||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Fair Value
|
(Level 1)
|
(Level 2)
|
(Level 3)
|
||||||||||||
U.S. government sponsored enterprises (GSEs)
|
$
|
5,031
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
5,031
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||
State and political subdivisions
|
41,785
|
-
|
41,785
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Other securities
|
5,034
|
-
|
5,034
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed GSE residential
|
119,156
|
-
|
119,156
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2019, Using:
|
||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
|
||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Fair Value
|
(Level 1)
|
(Level 2)
|
(Level 3)
|
||||||||||||
U.S. government sponsored enterprises (GSEs)
|
$
|
7,270
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
7,270
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||
State and political subdivisions
|
42,783
|
-
|
42,783
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Other securities
|
5,053
|
-
|
5,053
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed GSE residential
|
110,429
|
-
|
110,429
|
-
|
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.
Available-for-sale Securities. When quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1. The
Company does not have Level 1 securities. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated using pricing models, or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics. For these securities, the Company obtains fair
value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S.
29
Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other things. Level
2 securities include U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises, state and political subdivisions, other securities, mortgage-backed GSE residential securities and mortgage-backed other U.S. Government agencies. In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2
inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.
Nonrecurring Measurements. The following tables present the fair value measurement of assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
and the level within the ASC 820 fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fell at September 30 and June 30, 2019:
Fair Value Measurements at September 30 , 2019, Using:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Active Markets for
|
Significant Other
|
Significant
|
|||||||||||||
|
Identical Assets
|
Observable Inputs
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Fair Value
|
(Level 1)
|
(Level 2)
|
(Level 3)
|
||||||||||||
Foreclosed and repossessed assets held for sale
|
$
|
365
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
365
|
||||||||
Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2019, Using:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Active Markets for
|
Significant Other
|
Significant
|
|||||||||||||
|
Identical Assets
|
Observable Inputs
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Fair Value
|
(Level 1)
|
(Level 2)
|
(Level 3)
|
||||||||||||
Foreclosed and repossessed assets held for sale
|
2,430
|
-
|
-
|
2,430
|
||||||||||||
The following table presents gains and (losses) recognized on assets measured on a non-recurring basis for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018:
For the three months ended
|
||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
September 30, 2019
|
September 30, 2018
|
||||||
Foreclosed and repossessed assets held for sale
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
$
|
(115
|
)
|
||
Total (losses) gains on assets measured on a non-recurring basis
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
$
|
(115
|
)
|
The following is a description of valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and recognized in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets, as well as the general classification of such assets and liabilities pursuant to the valuation hierarchy. For assets classified within Level 3 of fair value hierarchy, the process used to develop the reported fair value process is
described below.
Foreclosed and Repossessed Assets Held for Sale. Foreclosed and repossessed assets held for sale are valued at the time the loan is
foreclosed upon or collateral is repossessed and the asset is transferred to foreclosed or repossessed assets held for sale. The value of the asset is based on third party or internal appraisals, less estimated costs to sell and appropriate
discounts, if any. The appraisals are generally discounted based on current and expected market conditions that may impact the sale or value of the asset and management’s knowledge and experience with similar assets. Such discounts typically may be
significant and result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value of these assets. Foreclosed and repossessed assets held for sale are continually evaluated for additional impairment and are adjusted accordingly if
impairment is identified.
30
Unobservable (Level 3) Inputs. The following table presents quantitative information about unobservable inputs used in recurring and
nonrecurring Level 3 fair value measurements.
(dollars in thousands)
|
Fair value at
September 30 , 2019 |
Valuation
technique |
Unobservable
inputs |
Range of
inputs applied |
Weighted-average
inputs applied |
||||||||||
Nonrecurring Measurements
|
|||||||||||||||
Foreclosed and repossessed assets
|
$
|
365
|
Third party appraisal
|
Marketability discount
|
0.0% - 32.6
|
%
|
32.6
|
%
|
|||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Fair value at
June 30, 2019 |
Valuation
technique |
Unobservable
inputs |
Range of
inputs applied |
Weighted-average
inputs applied |
||||||||||
Nonrecurring Measurements
|
|||||||||||||||
Foreclosed and repossessed assets
|
$
|
2,430
|
Third party appraisal
|
Marketability discount
|
5.1% - 77.0
|
%
|
35.2
|
%
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The following table presents estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments not reported
at fair value and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fell at September 30 and June 30, 2019.
September 30, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices
|
||||||||||||||||
in Active
|
Significant
|
|||||||||||||||
Markets for
|
Significant Other
|
Unobservable
|
||||||||||||||
Carrying
|
Identical Assets
|
Observable Inputs
|
Inputs
|
|||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Amount
|
(Level 1)
|
(Level 2)
|
(Level 3)
|
||||||||||||
Financial assets
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
31,423
|
$
|
31,423
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||
Interest-bearing time deposits
|
971
|
-
|
971
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Stock in FHLB
|
7,733
|
-
|
7,733
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Stock in Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
|
4,350
|
-
|
4,350
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Loans receivable, net
|
1,874,497
|
-
|
-
|
1,856,215
|
||||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable
|
11,648
|
-
|
11,648
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Financial liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
1,872,520
|
1,205,460
|
-
|
668,173
|
||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Advances from FHLB
|
103,327
|
-
|
104,078
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Note payable
|
3,000
|
-
|
-
|
3,000
|
||||||||||||
Accrued interest payable
|
1,900
|
-
|
1,900
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Subordinated debt
|
15,068
|
-
|
-
|
14,812
|
||||||||||||
Unrecognized financial instruments (net of contract amount)
|
||||||||||||||||
Commitments to originate loans
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Letters of credit
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Lines of credit
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
31
June 30, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices
|
||||||||||||||||
in Active
|
Significant
|
|||||||||||||||
Markets for
|
Significant Other
|
Unobservable
|
||||||||||||||
Carrying
|
Identical Assets
|
Observable Inputs
|
Inputs
|
|||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Amount
|
(Level 1)
|
(Level 2)
|
(Level 3)
|
||||||||||||
Financial assets
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
35,400
|
$
|
35,400
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||
Interest-bearing time deposits
|
969
|
-
|
969
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Stock in FHLB
|
5,233
|
-
|
5,233
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Stock in Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
|
4,350
|
-
|
4,350
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Loans receivable, net
|
1,846,405
|
-
|
-
|
1,823,040
|
||||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable
|
10,189
|
-
|
10,189
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Financial liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
1,893,695
|
1,214,606
|
-
|
678,301
|
||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase |
4,376
|
-
|
4,376
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Advances from FHLB
|
44,908
|
-
|
45,547
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Note payable
|
3,000
|
-
|
-
|
3,000
|
||||||||||||
Accrued interest payable
|
2,099
|
-
|
2,099
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Subordinated debt
|
15,043
|
-
|
-
|
15,267
|
||||||||||||
Unrecognized financial instruments (net of contract amount)
|
||||||||||||||||
Commitments to originate loans
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Letters of credit
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Lines of credit
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
The following methods and assumptions were used in estimating the fair values of financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents and interest-bearing time deposits are valued at their carrying amounts, which approximates book value. Stock in FHLB and the Federal Reserve Bank of St.
Louis is valued at cost, which approximates fair value. The fair value of loans is estimated on an exit price basis incorporating contractual cash flow, prepayments discount spreads, credit loss and liquidity premiums. Loans with similar
characteristics were aggregated for purposes of the calculations. The carrying amount of accrued interest approximates its fair value.
The fair value of fixed-maturity time deposits is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining
maturities. Non-maturity deposits and securities sold under agreements are valued at their carrying value, which approximates fair value. Fair value of advances from the FHLB is estimated by discounting maturities using an estimate of the current
market for similar instruments. The fair value of subordinated debt is estimated using rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and maturities. The fair value of commitments to originate loans is estimated using the fees
currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. The carrying amount of notes payable approximates fair value. For fixed-rate loan
commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and committed rates. The fair value of letters of credit and lines of credit are based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the
estimated cost to terminate or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date.
32
PART I: Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
General
Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. (Southern Missouri or Company) is a Missouri corporation and owns all of the outstanding stock of Southern Bank (the Bank). The Company’s earnings are
primarily dependent on the operations of the Bank. As a result, the following discussion relates primarily to the operations of the Bank. The Bank’s deposit accounts are generally insured up to a maximum of $250,000 by the Deposit Insurance Fund
(DIF), which is administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). At September 30, 2019, the Bank operated from its headquarters, 44 full-service branch offices, and two limited-service branch offices. The Bank owns the office
building and related land in which its headquarters are located, and 42 of its other branch offices. The remaining four branches are either leased or partially owned.
The significant accounting policies followed by Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries for interim financial reporting are consistent with the accounting
policies followed for annual financial reporting. All adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature and are in the opinion of management necessary for a fair statement of the results for the periods reported, have been included in the
accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements.
The consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of June 30, 2019, has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of that date. Certain information
and note disclosures normally included in the Company’s annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. These consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K annual report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is intended to assist in understanding the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The following discussion reviews the Company’s condensed consolidated financial condition
at September 30, 2019, and results of operations for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018.
Forward Looking Statements
This document contains statements about the Company and its subsidiaries which we believe are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may include, without limitation, statements with respect to anticipated future operating and financial performance, growth opportunities, interest rates, cost savings and funding advantages
expected or anticipated to be realized by management. Words such as “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan” and similar expressions are intended to identify these forward‑looking
statements. Forward-looking statements by the Company and its management are based on beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, estimates and intentions of management and are not guarantees of future performance. The important
factors we discuss below, as well as other factors discussed under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and identified in this filing and in our other filings with the SEC and those
presented elsewhere by our management from time to time, could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements made in this document:
•
|
expected cost savings, synergies and other benefits from our merger and acquisition activities, including our ongoing and recently completed acquisitions, might not be
realized within the anticipated time frames, to the extent anticipated, or at all, and costs or difficulties relating to integration matters, including but not limited to customer and employee retention, might be greater than expected;
|
|
•
|
the strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which we conduct operations;
|
|
•
|
fluctuations in interest rates and in real estate values;
|
|
•
|
monetary and fiscal policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”) and the U.S. Government and other governmental initiatives
affecting the financial services industry;
|
33
•
|
the risks of lending and investing activities, including changes in the level and direction of loan delinquencies and write-offs and changes in estimates of the adequacy of
the allowance for loan losses;
|
|
•
|
our ability to access cost-effective funding;
|
|
•
|
the timely development of and acceptance of our new products and services and the perceived overall value of these products and services by users, including the features,
pricing and quality compared to competitors' products and services;
|
|
•
|
fluctuations in real estate values and both residential and commercial real estate markets, as well as agricultural business conditions;
|
|
•
|
demand for loans and deposits in our market area;
|
|
•
|
legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our business;
|
|
•
|
changes in accounting principles, policies, or guidelines;
|
|
•
|
results of examinations of us by our regulators, including the possibility that our regulators may, among other things, require us to increase our reserve for loan losses or
to write-down assets;
|
|
•
|
the impact of technological changes; and
|
|
•
|
our success at managing the risks involved in the foregoing.
|
The Company disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements based on the occurrence of future events, the receipt of new information, or otherwise.
Critical Accounting Policies
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America are complex and require management to apply significant judgments to various accounting, reporting and
disclosure matters. Management of the Company must use assumptions and estimates to apply these principles where actual measurement is not possible or practical. For a complete discussion of the Company’s significant accounting policies, see “Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements” in the Company’s 2019 Annual Report. Certain policies are considered critical because they are highly dependent upon subjective or complex judgments, assumptions and estimates. Changes in such estimates may
have a significant impact on the financial statements. Management has reviewed the application of these policies with the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. For a discussion of applying critical accounting policies, see “Critical
Accounting Policies” beginning on page 53 in the Company’s 2019 Annual Report.
Executive Summary
Our results of operations depend primarily on our net interest margin, which is directly impacted by the interest rate environment. The net interest margin represents interest income
earned on interest-earning assets (primarily real estate loans, commercial and agricultural loans, and the investment portfolio), less interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities (primarily interest-bearing transaction accounts,
certificates of deposit, savings and money market deposit accounts, repurchase agreements, and borrowed funds), as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. Net interest margin is directly impacted by the spread between long-term interest
rates and short-term interest rates, as our interest-earning assets, particularly those with initial terms to maturity or repricing greater than one year, generally price off longer term rates while our interest-bearing liabilities generally price
off shorter term interest rates. This difference in longer term and shorter term interest rates is often referred to as the steepness of the yield curve. A steep yield curve – in which the difference in interest rates between short term and long
term periods is relatively large – could be beneficial to our net interest income, as the interest rate spread between our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities would be larger. Conversely, a flat or flattening yield curve, in
which the difference in rates between short term and long term periods is relatively small or shrinking, or an inverted yield curve, in which short term rates exceed long term rates, could have an adverse impact on our net interest income, as our
interest rate spread could decrease.
Our results of operations may also be affected significantly by general and local economic and competitive conditions, particularly those with respect to changes in market interest
rates, government policies and actions of regulatory authorities.
34
During the first three months of fiscal 2020, we grew our balance sheet by $36.8 million. Balance sheet growth was primarily attributable to loan growth, as loans, net of the
allowance for loan losses, increased $28.1 million. Available-for-sale (AFS) securities increased $5.5 million, and cash equivalents and time deposits decreased a combined $4.0 million. Deposits decreased $21.2 million. During the fiscal year to
date, the Company has experienced a decrease of $24.0 million in public unit deposits, and a decrease of $19.5 million in brokered certificates of deposit, partially offset by an increase of $7.8 million in brokered nonmaturity deposits. Securities
sold under agreements to repurchase decreased by $4.4 million. Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) increased $58.4 million, primarily attributable to the Company’s use of this funding source to replace brokered deposits, and to fund
loan growth in what is typically a seasonally slow first fiscal quarter for deposit growth. Equity increased $3.9 million, attributable to retention of net income and an increase in other comprehensive income, partially offset by cash dividends and
share repurchases.
Net income for the first three months of fiscal 2020 was $7.8 million, an increase of $1.0 million, or 15.1% as compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. Compared to the
year-ago period, the Company’s increase in net income was the result of increases in net interest income and noninterest income, and partially offset by increases in noninterest expense, provision for income taxes, and provision for loan losses.
Diluted net income available to common shareholders was $.85 per share for the first three months of fiscal 2020, as compared to $.76 per share for the same period of the prior fiscal year. For the first three months of fiscal 2019, net interest
income increased $2.4 million, or 13.9%; noninterest income increased $671,000, or 19.6%; noninterest expense increased $1.5 million, or 13.2%, provision for income taxes increased $310,000, or 18.6%; and provision for loan losses increased
$214,000, or 31.4%, as compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. For more information see “Results of Operations.”
Interest rates during the first three months of fiscal 2020 moved lower, while the yield curve remained flat or in some segments inverted further. At September 30, 2019, as compared
to June 30, 2019, the yield on two-year treasuries dropped to 1.63% from 1.75%; the yield on five-year treasuries dropped to 1.55% from 1.76%; the yield on ten-year treasuries dropped to 1.68% from 2.00%; and the yield on 30-year treasuries dropped
from 2.52% to 2.12%. The spread between two- and ten-year treasuries dropped from 25 to five basis points, and inverted briefly in late August. As compared to the first three months of the prior fiscal year, our average yield on earning assets
increased by 21 basis points, reflecting loans originated and renewed at higher market rates reflecting increases through December 2018 by the Federal Reserve’s Open Market Committee (FOMC), and partially offset by inclusion in the prior period’s
results of larger benefits from discount accretion on acquired loan portfolios (see “Results of Operations: Comparison of the three-month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 – Net Interest Income”). The FOMC increased targeted overnight rates
by 25 basis points in each of March, June, September, and December of 2018, and then lowered rates by 25 basis points in each of July and September, 2019. The slope of the yield curve remains concerning, especially as funding cost increases have
picked up in recent quarters. Our average cost of interest-bearing deposits increased by 34 basis points, and our average cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased 36 basis points, when comparing the current three-month period with the same
period of the prior fiscal year.
Net interest income increased $2.4 million, or 13.9%, as the Company saw an increase of 17.2% in average interest earning assets, partially offset by a decline in the net interest
margin. Our net interest margin decreased 11 basis points when comparing the first three months of fiscal 2020 to the same period of the prior fiscal year. The decrease was attributable primarily to an increased cost of funds and smaller benefits
from the accretion of the discounts on acquired loans carried at fair value, partially offset by increased asset yields generally. Benefits attributable to accretion of discounts on acquired loans (partially offset by the accretion of discounts on
assumed time deposits) resulting from the 2014 acquisition of Peoples Bank of the Ozarks (the Peoples Acquisition), the 2017 acquisition of Capaha Bank (the Capaha Acquisition), the February 2018 acquisition of Southern Missouri Bank of Marshfield
(the SMB-Marshfield Acquisition), and the November 2018 acquisition of Gideon Bancshares Company and its subsidiary, First Commercial Bank (the Gideon Acquisition) totaled $508,000, as compared to $1.2 million in the first three months of fiscal
2019. In the current period, this component of net interest income contributed 10 basis points to the net interest margin, a decrease from a contribution of 27 basis points in the year-ago period. The dollar impact of this component of net interest
income has generally been declining each sequential quarter as assets mature or prepay, particularly those acquired from the Peoples Acquisition and the Capaha Acquisition, though the Gideon
35
Acquisition partially offsets that decline, as there was no comparable item in the same period a year ago. In the same period a year ago resolution of particular acquired impaired
credits from the Peoples Acquisition and the Capaha acquisition resulted in notably higher levels of discount accretion in that period. The Company generally expects this component of net interest income to decline. Also, the Company recognized an
additional $414,000 in interest income as a result of the resolution of particular nonperforming loans during the current period. The recognition of interest income on these loans contributed eight basis points to the net interest margin, without
material comparable items in the year ago or linked period.
The Company’s net income is also affected by the level of its noninterest income and noninterest expenses. Non-interest income generally consists primarily of deposit account service
charges, bank card interchange income, loan-related fees, earnings on bank-owned life insurance, gains on sales of loans, and other general operating income. Noninterest expenses consist primarily of compensation and employee benefits,
occupancy-related expenses, deposit insurance assessments, professional fees, advertising, postage and office expenses, insurance, bank card network expenses, the amortization of intangible assets, and other general operating expenses. During the
three-month period ended September 30, 2019, noninterest income increased $671,000, or 19.6%, as compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year, attributable primarily to bank card interchange income, deposit account service charges, wealth
management and insurance brokerage commissions, and gains realized on sales of residential loans originated for sale into the secondary market, partially offset by decreases in loan fees and mortgage servicing income. Noninterest expense for the
three-month period ended September 30, 2019, increased $1.5 million, or 13.2%, as compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. The increase was attributable primarily to increases in compensation and benefits, occupancy expenses, and bank
card network expense, partially offset by decreases in deposit insurance premiums and legal and professional fees. There were no material charges related to merger and acquisition activity in the current period, as compared to charges of $175,000
in the same period of the prior fiscal year.
Increases in net interest income, noninterest income, and noninterest expense were attributable in part to the Gideon Acquisition, which was completed in November 2018.
We expect, over time, to continue to grow our assets through the origination and occasional purchase of loans, and purchases of investment securities. The primary funding for this
asset growth is expected to come from retail deposits, brokered funding, and short- and long-term FHLB borrowings. We have grown and intend to continue to grow deposits by offering desirable deposit products for our current customers and by
attracting new depository relationships. We will also continue to explore strategic expansion opportunities in market areas that we believe will be attractive to our business model.
Comparison of Financial Condition at September 30 and June 30, 2019
The Company experienced balance sheet growth in the first three months of fiscal 2019, with total assets of $2.3 billion at September 30, 2019, reflecting an increase of $36.8
million, or 1.7%, as compared to June 30, 2019. Asset growth was comprised mainly of increases in loans and AFS securities, while cash equivalents were reduced.
Available for sale securities were $171.0 million at September 30, 2019, an increase of $5.5 million, or 3.3%, as compared to June 30, 2019. Cash equivalents and time deposits were a
combined $32.4 million, a decrease of $4.0 million, or 10.9%, as compared to June 30, 2019, attributable to normal variances.
Loans, net of the allowance for loan losses, were $1.9 billion at September 30, 2019, an increase of $28.1 million, or 1.5%, as compared to June 30, 2019. The portfolio saw growth in
commercial loan balances, funded balances in construction loans, and consumer loans, partially offset by declines in residential and commercial real estate loans. The increase in commercial loan balances was attributable to growth in agricultural
operating and equipment loan balances, some of which is seasonal, along with increases in commercial & industrial loan balances. Construction loan balances were increase as a result of both draws on existing construction loans and new loans.
Growth in consumer loans consisted primarily of loans secured by deposits and home equity line of credit balances. Residential real estate balances were lower as the Company saw reductions in loans secured by multifamily real estate, partially
offset by an increase in loans secured by one- to four-family real estate. Commercial real estate loans were reduced slightly as payoffs on nonresidential properties were mostly offset by increases in loans secured by land and development ground.
36
Deposits were $1.9 billion at September, 2019, a decrease of $21.2 million, or 1.1%, as compared to June 30, 2019. The decrease was attributable to public unit deposits, which
decreased by $24.0 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2020, and totaled $242.8 million at September 30, 2019. The decrease was also attributable in part to a reduction in brokered deposits, which declined on net by $11.7 million, reflecting
a decrease in brokered time deposits of $19.5 million, and an increase in brokered nonmaturity deposits of $7.8 million. Brokered time deposits were $25.4 million, and brokered nonmaturity deposits were $16.1 million, at September 30, 2019. Our
discussion of brokered deposits excludes those deposits originated through reciprocal arrangements, as our reciprocal deposits are primarily originated by our public unit depositors and utilized as an alternative to pledging securities against
those deposits. Recently updated regulatory guidance, adopted following the May 2018 enactment of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (Senate Bill 2155), has generally exempted deposits originated through such
reciprocal arrangements from classification as brokered deposits for regulatory purposes, subject to some limitations. In total, deposit balances saw reductions in certificates of deposit, noninterest-bearing transaction accounts, interest-bearing
transaction accounts, and savings accounts, partially offset by growth in money market deposit accounts. The average loan-to-deposit ratio for the first quarter of fiscal 2020 was 99.2%, as compared to 101.6% for the same period of the prior fiscal
year.
FHLB advances were $103.3 million at September 30, 2019, an increase of $58.4 million, or 130.1%, as compared to June 30, 2019. The increase was primarily attributable to the
Company's use of this funding source to replace brokered deposits, and to fund loan growth in what is typically a seasonally slow first quarter for deposit growth. The increase consisted of $52.6 million in overnight funding and $5.8 million in
term advances. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase declined to $0, from a balance of $4.4 million at June 30, 2019. Over the past several years, the Company has worked to move public unit and business customers from a swept repurchase
agreement product, which required the use of the Company’s AFS securities portfolio to provide the securities to collateralize those borrowings, to a reciprocal deposit product. During the first quarter of fiscal 2020, the final customers utilizing
the sweep product were migrated.
The Company’s stockholders’ equity was $242.3 million at September 30, 2019, an increase of $3.9 million, or 1.6%, as compared to June 30, 2019. The increase was attributable to
retained earnings and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income, which is due to a decrease in market interest rates, partially offset by the payment of dividends on common stock and by repurchases of 86,050 Company shares, acquired for
$2.8 million, for an average price of $32.70 per share.
Average Balance Sheet, Interest, and Average Yields and Rates for the Three-Month Periods Ended
September 30, 2019 and 2018
The tables below present certain information regarding our financial condition and net interest income for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018. The tables
present the annualized average yield on interest-earning assets and the annualized average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. We derived the yields and costs by dividing annualized income or expense by the average balance of interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities, respectively, for the periods shown. Yields on tax-exempt obligations were not computed on a tax equivalent basis.
37
Three-month period ended
|
Three-month period ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2019
|
September 30, 2018
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Average
Balance |
Interest and Dividends
|
Yield/
Cost (%) |
Average
Balance |
Interest and Dividends
|
Yield/
Cost (%) |
||||||||||||||||||
Interest earning assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans (1)
|
$
|
1,420,538
|
$
|
19,067
|
5.37
|
$
|
1,233,511
|
$
|
15,676
|
5.08
|
||||||||||||||
Other loans (1)
|
444,806
|
6,573
|
5.91
|
352,230
|
5,240
|
5.95
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total net loans
|
1,865,344
|
25,640
|
5.50
|
1,585,741
|
20,916
|
5.28
|
||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
113,614
|
716
|
2.52
|
94,308
|
584
|
2.48
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities (2)
|
66,009
|
520
|
3.15
|
67,245
|
517
|
3.08
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other interest earning assets
|
7,001
|
46
|
2.62
|
3,196
|
25
|
3.13
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total interest earning assets (1)
|
2,051,968
|
26,922
|
5.25
|
1,750,490
|
22,042
|
5.04
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other noninterest earning assets (3)
|
184,415
|
-
|
150,037
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$
|
2,236,383
|
$
|
26,922
|
$
|
1,900,527
|
$
|
22,042
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest bearing liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings accounts
|
$
|
167,202
|
346
|
0.83
|
$
|
153,305
|
243
|
0.63
|
||||||||||||||||
NOW accounts
|
623,895
|
1,706
|
1.09
|
548,024
|
1,261
|
0.92
|
||||||||||||||||||
Money market deposit accounts
|
196,737
|
803
|
1.63
|
120,310
|
344
|
1.14
|
||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit
|
673,160
|
3,723
|
2.21
|
541,931
|
2,161
|
1.60
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total interest bearing deposits
|
1,660,994
|
6,578
|
1.58
|
1,363,570
|
4,009
|
1.18
|
||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements
to repurchase |
329
|
-
|
0.03
|
3,649
|
8
|
0.88
|
||||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances
|
82,192
|
522
|
2.54
|
105,081
|
599
|
2.28
|
||||||||||||||||||
Note Payable
|
3,000
|
37
|
4.88
|
3,000
|
35
|
4.67
|
||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated debt
|
15,055
|
225
|
5.99
|
14,957
|
224
|
5.99
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total interest bearing liabilities
|
1,761,570
|
7,362
|
1.67
|
1,490,257
|
4,875
|
1.31
|
||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest bearing demand deposits
|
218,755
|
-
|
196,683
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Other noninterest bearing liabilities
|
16,014
|
-
|
10,153
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities
|
1,996,339
|
7,362
|
1,697,093
|
4,875
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders’ equity
|
240,044
|
-
|
203,434
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and
stockholders' equity |
$
|
2,236,383
|
$
|
7,362
|
$
|
1,900,527
|
$
|
4,875
|
||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$
|
19,560
|
$
|
17,167
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate spread (4)
|
3.58
|
%
|
3.73
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin (5)
|
3.81
|
%
|
3.92
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of average interest-earning assets
to average interest-bearing liabilities |
116.49
|
%
|
117.46
|
%
|
(1)
|
Calculated net of deferred loan fees, loan discounts and loans-in-process. Non-accrual loans are not included in average loans.
|
(2)
|
Includes FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis membership stock and related cash dividends.
|
(3)
|
Includes average balances for fixed assets and BOLI of $54.7 million and $37.6 million, respectively, for the three-month period ended September 30, 2018, as compared to $54.1
million and $34.4 million, respectively, for the same period of the prior fiscal year.
|
(4)
|
Interest rate spread represents the difference between the average rate on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
|
(5)
|
Net interest margin represents annualized net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
|
38
Rate/Volume Analysis
The following table sets forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on the Company’s net interest income for the three-month period ended September 30, 2019, compared to the
three-month period ended September 30, 2018. Information is provided with respect to (i) effects on interest income and expense attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by the prior rate), (ii) effects on interest income and
expense attributable to change in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume), and (iii) changes in rate/volume (change in rate multiplied by change in volume).
Three-month period ended September 30, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||
Compared to three-month period ended September 30, 2018
|
||||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) Due to
|
||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Rate
|
Volume
|
Rate/Volume
|
Net
|
||||||||||||
Interest-earnings assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Loans receivable (1)
|
$
|
880
|
$
|
3,688
|
$
|
156
|
$
|
4,724
|
||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
11
|
120
|
1
|
132
|
||||||||||||
Investment securities (2)
|
13
|
(9
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
3
|
||||||||||
Other interest-earning deposits
|
(4
|
)
|
30
|
(5
|
)
|
21
|
||||||||||
Total net change in income on
|
||||||||||||||||
interest-earning assets
|
900
|
3,829
|
151
|
4,880
|
||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
1,294
|
938
|
337
|
2,569
|
||||||||||||
Securities sold under
|
||||||||||||||||
agreements to repurchase
|
(8
|
)
|
(7
|
)
|
7
|
(8
|
)
|
|||||||||
FHLB advances
|
68
|
(130
|
)
|
(15
|
)
|
(77
|
)
|
|||||||||
Note Payable
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
2
|
||||||||||||
Subordinated Debt
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
||||||||||||
Total net change in expense on
|
||||||||||||||||
interest-bearing liabilities
|
1,355
|
802
|
330
|
2,487
|
||||||||||||
Net change in net interest income
|
$
|
(455
|
)
|
$
|
3,027
|
$
|
(179
|
)
|
$
|
2,393
|
(1)
|
Does not include interest on loans placed on nonaccrual status.
|
(2)
|
Does not include dividends earned on equity securities.
|
Results of Operations – Comparison of the three-month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
General. Net income for the three-month period ended September 30, 2019, was $7.8 million, an increase of $1.0 million, or 15.1%, as compared
to the same period of the prior fiscal year. The increase was attributable to an increase in net interest income and noninterest income, partially offset by increases in noninterest expense, provision for income taxes, and provision for loan
losses.
For the three-month period ended September 30, 2019, basic and fully-diluted net income per share available to common shareholders was $0.85 under both measures, as compared to $0.76
under both measures for the same period of the prior fiscal year, which represented an increase of $0.09, or 11.8%. Our annualized return on average assets for the three-month period ended September 30, 2019, was 1.40%, as compared to 1.43% for the
same period of the prior fiscal year. Our return on average common stockholders’ equity for the three-month period ended September 30, 2019, was 13.0%, as compared to 13.4% in the same period of the prior fiscal year.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income for the three-month period ended September 30, 2019, was $19.6 million, an increase of $2.4 million,
or 13.9%, as compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. The increase was attributable to a 17.2% increase in the average balance of interest-earning assets, partially offset by a decrease in net interest margin to 3.81% in the current
three-month period, from 3.92% in the three-month period a year ago. Our net interest margin is determined by dividing annualized net interest income by total average interest-earning assets.
39
Loan discount accretion and deposit premium amortization related to the Peoples Acquisition, the Capaha Acquisition, the SMB-Marshfield Acquisition, and the Gideon Acquisition
resulted in an additional $508,000 in net interest income for the three-month period ended September 30, 2019, as compared to $1.2 million in net interest income for the same period a year ago. In the year ago period, there were significant impacts
from the favorable resolution of specific purchased credit impaired loans obtained in the Peoples and Capaha Acquisitions, and no accretion from the Gideon Acquisition, which did not close until the second quarter of fiscal 2019. Combined, these
components of net interest income contributed ten basis points to net interest margin in the three-month period ended September 30, 2019, as compared to a contribution of 27 basis points for the same period of the prior fiscal year. For the linked
quarter, ended June 30, 2019, when net interest margin was 3.77%, comparable discount accretion contributed 12 basis points to the net interest margin. Over the longer term, the Company expects this component of net interest income to decline,
although to the extent that we have periodic resolutions of specific credit impaired loans, this may create volatility in this component of net interest income. Also, the Company recognized an additional $414,000 in interest income as a result of
the resolution of nonperforming loans during the current period. This recognition of interest income contributed eight basis points to the net interest margin, without material comparable items in the year ago or linked period.
For the three-month period ended September 30, 2019, our net interest rate spread was 3.58%, as compared to 3.73% in the year-ago period. The decrease in net interest rate spread,
compared to the same period a year ago, resulted from a 36 basis point increase in the average cost of interest-earning liabilities, partially offset by a 21 basis point increase in the average yield on interest-earning assets.
Interest Income. Total interest income for the three-month period ended September 30, 2019, was $26.9 million, an increase of $4.9 million,
or 22.1%, as compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. The increase was attributed to a 17.2% increase in the average balance of interest-earning assets, combined with a 21 basis point increase in the average yield earned on
interest-earning assets, as compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. Increased average interest-earning balances were attributable primarily to growth in the loan portfolio, while investment balances increased at a slower rate. The
increase in the average yield on interest-earning assets was primarily attributable to origination and renewals of loans at higher market rates over the previous 12 months, as well as to the recognition of interest on some loans previously treated
as nonaccrual, partially offset by the decrease in loan discount accretion, discussed above.
Interest Expense. Total interest expense for the three-month period ended September 30, 2019, was $7.4 million, an increase of $2.5 million,
or 51.0%, as compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. The increase was attributable to a 36 basis point increase in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities, combined with an 18.2% increase in the average balance of
interest-bearing liabilities, as compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. The increase in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities was attributable primarily to origination and renewals of certificates of deposit at higher
market rates over the previous 12 months, as well as to market rates for money market deposit accounts and savings accounts that have remained above the rates paid during the same period of the prior fiscal year. Increased average interest-bearing
balances were attributable primarily to increases in certificates of deposit, money market deposit accounts, and interest-bearing transaction accounts, partially offset by lower FHLB and repurchase agreement balances.
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses for the three-month period ended September 30, 2019, was $896,000, as compared to
$682,000 in the same period of the prior fiscal year. Increased provisioning was attributed primarily to increased loan balances subject to allowance methodology, as acquired loan balances mature and prepay, and are replaced by new loan production,
or are refinanced by the Company. Additionally, in the same period of the prior fiscal year, provisioning was lower as a result of principal repayment on loans for which an allowance for loan losses had been established under ASC 310-10-35. As a
percentage of average loans outstanding, the provision for loan losses in the current three-month period represented a charge of 0.19% (annualized), while the Company recorded net charge offs during the period of 0.02% (annualized). During the same
period of the prior fiscal year, the provision for loan losses as a percentage of average loans outstanding represented a charge of 0.17% (annualized), while the Company recorded net charge offs of 0.03% (annualized). (See “Critical Accounting
Policies”, “Allowance for Loan Loss Activity” and “Nonperforming Assets”).
40
Noninterest Income. The Company’s noninterest income for the three-month period ended September 30, 2019, was $4.1 million, an increase of $671,000, or 19.6%, as compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. Increases in bank card interchange income, deposit account service charges, wealth management and insurance brokerage commissions, and gains realized on sales of residential loans originated for sale into the secondary market were partially offset by decreases in loan fees and mortgage servicing income. Bank card interchange income and deposit account service charges increased as a result of higher levels of depositor activity, attributable in part to the Gideon Acquisition. Wealth management and insurance brokerage commissions increased as a result of the establishment or acquisition of these new business lines for the Company. Gains realized on sales of residential loans originated for sale into the secondary market increased as a result of an increase in the volume of originations, as well as a shift in the loan mix to more profitable products. Loan fees were decreased primarily due to the inclusion of a larger loan prepayment penalty in the same period of the prior year, and mortgage servicing income was decreased due primarily to faster prepayments of serviced loans.
Loan servicing fees and gains realized on the sale of residential real estate loans originated for sale into the secondary market decreased primarily as a result of a reduction in
this type of loan origination, attributable to the increase in market interest rates and associated declines in refinancing activity.
Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense for the three-month period ended September 30, 2019, was $13.0 million, an increase of $1.5 million,
or 13.2%, as compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. The increase was attributable primarily to increases in compensation and benefits, occupancy expenses, and bank card network expenses, partially offset by decreases in deposit
insurance premiums and legal and professional fees. Noninterest expense items generally were increased as a result of additional staff, facilities and transactions following the Gideon Acquisition. Partially offsetting these increases, in September
2019, the FDIC began applying credits to the deposit insurance assessments due from smaller banks, such as the Company’s subsidiary. These credits represented the costs borne by smaller banks over several years to increase the deposit insurance
fund ratio as required under the Dodd-Frank Act. As a result, we recognized no deposit insurance premium expense for the current quarter, as compared to an expense of $138,000 in the year ago period. Provided the deposit insurance fund ratio
remains above 1.35%, the Company would expect to recognize no deposit insurance premium expense in the quarter which will end December 31, 2019, and a reduced expense in the quarter which will end March 31, 2020, before the expense returns to a
normalized level for the quarter ended June 30, 2020. After recording $175,000 in charges related to merger and acquisition activity in the same quarter a year ago, there were no comparable expenses in the current period. The Company also realized
a reduced off-balance sheet credit exposure, resulting in a recovery of $146,000 in the current period, as compared to a charge of $23,000 in the year ago period. The efficiency ratio for the three-month period ended September 30, 2019, was 54.8%,
as compared to 55.6% in the same period of the prior fiscal year.
Income Taxes. The income tax provision for the three-month period ended September 30, 2019, was $2.0 million, an increase of $310,000, or
18.6%, as compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year, attributable primarily to higher pre-tax income, combined with an increase in the effective tax rate, to 20.2%, as compared to 19.7% in the same period of the prior fiscal year. The
higher effective tax rate was attributed primarily to the increases in pre-tax income in excess of increases in tax-advantaged investments.
Allowance for Loan Loss Activity
The Company regularly reviews its allowance for loan losses and makes adjustments to its balance based on management’s analysis of the loan portfolio, the amount of non-performing
and classified loans, as well as general economic conditions. Although the Company maintains its allowance for loan losses at a level that it considers sufficient to provide for losses, there can be no assurance that future losses will not exceed
internal estimates. In addition, the amount of the allowance for loan losses is subject to review by regulatory agencies, which can order the establishment of additional loss provision. The following table summarizes changes in the allowance for
loan losses over the three-month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018:
41
For the three months ended
|
||||||||
September 30,
|
||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
2019
|
2018
|
||||||
Balance, beginning of period
|
$
|
19,903
|
$
|
18,214
|
||||
Loans charged off:
|
||||||||
Residential real estate
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Construction
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Commercial business
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Commercial real estate
|
(72
|
)
|
(95
|
)
|
||||
Consumer
|
(35
|
)
|
(17
|
)
|
||||
Gross charged off loans
|
(107
|
)
|
(112
|
)
|
||||
Recoveries of loans previously charged off:
|
||||||||
Residential real estate
|
-
|
1
|
||||||
Construction
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Commercial business
|
14
|
1
|
||||||
Commercial real estate
|
4
|
-
|
||||||
Consumer
|
-
|
4
|
||||||
Gross recoveries of charged off loans
|
18
|
6
|
||||||
Net (charge offs) recoveries
|
(89
|
)
|
(106
|
)
|
||||
Provision charged to expense
|
896
|
682
|
||||||
Balance, end of period
|
$
|
20,710
|
$
|
18,790
|
The allowance for loan losses has been calculated based upon an evaluation of pertinent factors underlying the various types and quality of the Company’s loans. Management considers
such factors as the repayment status of a loan, the estimated net fair value of the underlying collateral, the borrower’s intent and ability to repay the loan, local economic conditions, and the Company’s historical loss ratios. We maintain the
allowance for loan losses through the provision for loan losses that we charge to income. We charge losses on loans against the allowance for loan losses when we believe the collection of loan principal is unlikely. The allowance for loan losses
increased $807,000 to $20.7 million at September 30, 2019, from $19.9 million at June 30, 2019. The increase was deemed appropriate in order to bring the allowance for loan losses to a level that reflects management’s estimate of the incurred loss
in the Company’s loan portfolio at September 30, 2019.
At September 30, 2019, the Company had loans of $25.8 million, or 1.36% of total loans, adversely classified ($25.8 million classified “substandard” none classified “doubtful”), as
compared to loans of $28.3 million, or 1.51% of total loans, adversely classified ($28.2 million classified “substandard” $35,000 classified “doubtful”) at June 30, 2019, and $11.7 million, or 0.71% of total loans, adversely classified ($11.1
million classified “substandard” $643,000 classified “doubtful”) at September 30, 2018. Classified loans were generally comprised of loans secured by commercial and residential real estate, and other commercial purpose collateral. All loans were
classified due to concerns as to the borrowers’ ability to continue to generate sufficient cash flows to service the debt. Of our classified loans, the Company had ceased recognition of interest on loans with a carrying value of $13.4 million at
September 30, 2019. As noted in Note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company’s total past due loans decreased from $11.6 million at June 30, 2019, to $9.9 million at September 30, 2019.
In its quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses, the Company employs historical data including past due percentages, charge offs, and recoveries for the
previous five years for each loan category. The Company’s allowance methodology considers the most recent twelve-month period’s average net charge offs and uses this information as one of the primary factors for evaluation of allowance adequacy.
Average net charge offs are calculated as net charge offs by portfolio type for the period as a percentage of the average balance of respective portfolio type over the same period.
42
The following table sets forth the Company’s historical net charge offs as of September 30 and June 30, 2019:
Portfolio segment
|
September 30, 2019
|
June 30, 2019
|
Net charge offs –
|
Net charge offs –
|
|
12-month historical
|
12-month historical
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
||
Residential
|
0.01%
|
0.01%
|
Construction
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
Commercial
|
0.01%
|
0.02%
|
Consumer loans
|
0.11%
|
0.14%
|
Commercial loans
|
0.03%
|
0.02%
|
Additionally, in its quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, the Company evaluates changes in the financial condition of individual borrowers; changes in
local, regional, and national economic conditions; the Company’s historical loss experience; and changes in market conditions for property pledged to the Company as collateral. The Company has identified specific qualitative factors that address
these issues and subjectively assigns a percentage to each factor. Qualitative factors are reviewed quarterly and may be adjusted as necessary to reflect improving or declining trends. At September 30, 2019, these qualitative factors included:
•
|
Changes in lending policies
|
•
|
National, regional, and local economic conditions
|
•
|
Changes in mix and volume of portfolio
|
•
|
Experience, ability, and depth of lending management and staff
|
•
|
Entry to new markets
|
•
|
Levels and trends of delinquent, nonaccrual, special mention and
|
•
|
Classified loans
|
•
|
Concentrations of credit
|
•
|
Changes in collateral values
|
•
|
Agricultural economic conditions
|
•
|
Regulatory risk
|
43
The qualitative factors are applied to the allowance for loan losses based upon the following percentages by loan type:
Portfolio segment
|
Qualitative factor
applied at interim period
ended September 30, 2019
|
Qualitative factor
applied at fiscal year
ended June 30, 2019
|
Real estate loans:
|
||
Residential
|
0.64%
|
0.66%
|
Construction
|
1.70%
|
1.69%
|
Commercial
|
1.13%
|
1.14%
|
Consumer loans
|
1.46%
|
1.40%
|
Commercial loans
|
1.28%
|
1.28%
|
At September 30, 2019, the amount of our allowance for loan losses attributable to these qualitative factors was approximately $17.7 million, as compared to $17.1 million at June 30,
2019, primarily due to loan growth. The relatively small change in qualitative factors applied was attributable to normal portfolio fluctuations with management’s assessment that risks represented by the qualitative factors are relatively unchanged
since the prior quarter end. Higher levels of net charge offs requiring additional provision for loan losses could result. Although management uses the best information available, the level of the allowance for loan losses remains an estimate that
is subject to significant judgment and short-term change.
Nonperforming Assets
The ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets and nonperforming loans to net loans receivable is another measure of asset quality. Nonperforming assets of the Company include
nonaccruing loans, accruing loans delinquent/past maturity 90 days or more, and assets which have been acquired as a result of foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. The table below summarizes changes in the Company’s level of nonperforming
assets over selected time periods:
(dollars in thousands)
|
September 30, 2019
|
June 30, 2019
|
September 30, 2018
|
|||||||||
Nonaccruing loans:
|
||||||||||||
Residential real estate
|
$
|
5,286
|
$
|
6,404
|
$
|
5,060
|
||||||
Construction
|
-
|
-
|
24
|
|||||||||
Commercial real estate
|
6,968
|
10,876
|
1,657
|
|||||||||
Consumer
|
179
|
309
|
211
|
|||||||||
Commercial business
|
1,588
|
3,424
|
605
|
|||||||||
Total
|
14,021
|
21,013
|
7,557
|
|||||||||
Loans 90 days past due accruing interest:
|
||||||||||||
Residential real estate
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Construction
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Commercial real estate
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Consumer
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Commercial business
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Total
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Total nonperforming loans
|
14,021
|
21,013
|
7,557
|
|||||||||
Foreclosed assets held for sale:
|
||||||||||||
Real estate owned
|
3,820
|
3,723
|
4,926
|
|||||||||
Other nonperforming assets
|
71
|
29
|
51
|
|||||||||
Total nonperforming assets
|
$
|
17,912
|
$
|
24,765
|
$
|
12,534
|
At September 30, 2019, troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) totaled $17.8 million, of which $5.4 million was considered nonperforming and is included in the nonaccrual loan total
above. The remaining $12.4 million in TDRs have complied with the modified terms for a reasonable period of time and are therefore considered by the Company to be accrual status loans. In general, these loans were subject to classification as TDRs
at September 30, 2019, on the basis of guidance under ASU No. 2011-02, which indicates that the Company may not consider the
44
borrower’s effective borrowing rate on the old debt immediately before the restructuring in determining whether a concession has been granted. At June 30, 2019, TDRs totaled $19.0
million, of which $5.8 million was considered nonperforming and is included in the nonaccrual loan total above. The remaining $13.2 million in TDRs at June 30, 2019, had complied with the modified terms for a reasonable period of time and were
therefore considered by the Company to be accrual status loans.
At September 30, 2019, nonperforming assets totaled $17.9 million, as compared to $24.8 million at June 30, 2019, and $12.5 million at September 30, 2018. The decrease in
nonperforming assets from fiscal year end was attributable to a decrease in nonaccrual loans, as the Company resolved some of the nonaccrual loans which had been acquired in the Gideon Acquisition. At December 31, 2018, the quarter end immediately
following the Gideon Acquisition, nonaccrual loans attributable to the Gideon Acquisition totaled $12.9 million. At September 30, 2019, nonaccrual loans attributable to the Gideon Acquisition totaled $8.0 million, as compared to $10.2 million at
June 30, 2019.
Liquidity Resources
The term “liquidity” refers to our ability to generate adequate amounts of cash to fund loan originations, loans purchases, deposit withdrawals and operating expenses. Our primary
sources of funds include deposit growth, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, FHLB advances, brokered deposits, amortization and prepayment of loan principal and interest, investment maturities and sales, and funds provided by our
operations. While the scheduled loan repayments and maturing investments are relatively predictable, deposit flows, FHLB advance redemptions, and loan and security prepayment rates are significantly influenced by factors outside of the Bank’s
control, including interest rates, general and local economic conditions and competition in the marketplace. The Bank relies on FHLB advances and brokered deposits as additional sources for funding cash or liquidity needs.
The Company uses its liquid resources principally to satisfy its ongoing cash requirements, which include funding loan commitments, funding maturing certificates of deposit and
deposit withdrawals, maintaining liquidity, funding maturing or called FHLB advances, purchasing investments, and meeting operating expenses.
At September 30, 2019, the Company had outstanding commitments and approvals to extend credit of approximately $354.9 million (including $193.5 million in unused lines of credit) in
mortgage and non-mortgage loans. These commitments and approvals are expected to be funded through existing cash balances, cash flow from normal operations and, if needed, advances from the FHLB or the Federal Reserve’s discount window. At
September 30, 2019, the Bank had pledged $764.3 million of its single-family residential and commercial real estate loan portfolios to the FHLB for available credit of approximately $370.9 million, of which $103.7 million had been advanced. The
Bank has the ability to pledge several other loan portfolios, including, for example, its commercial and home equity loans, which could provide additional collateral for additional borrowings; in total, FHLB borrowings are generally limited to 45%
of bank assets, or approximately $990.4 million, subject to available collateral. Also, at September 30, 2019, the Bank had pledged a total of $270.6 million in loans secured by farmland and agricultural production loans to the Federal Reserve,
providing access to $202.7 million in primary credit borrowings from the Federal Reserve’s discount window. Management believes its liquid resources will be sufficient to meet the Company’s liquidity needs.
Regulatory Capital
The Company and Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can result in
certain mandatory—and possibly additional discretionary – actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for
prompt corrective action, the Company and Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company and the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under U.S. GAAP, regulatory
reporting requirements and regulatory capital standards. The Company’s and Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Furthermore,
the Company’s and Bank’s regulators could require adjustments to regulatory capital not reflected in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Quantitative measures established by regulatory capital standards to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the
table below) of total capital, Tier 1 capital (as defined), and common equity Tier 1 capital (as defined) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and of Tier 1 capital (as
45
defined) to average total assets (as defined). Management believes, as of September 30 and June 30, 2019, that the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which
they are subject.
In July 2013, the Federal banking agencies announced their approval of the final rule to implement the Basel III regulatory reforms, among other changes required by the Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The approved rule included a new minimum ratio of common equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital of 4.5%, raised the minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets from 4.0% to 6.0%, and included a
minimum leverage ratio of 4.0% for all banking institutions. Additionally, the rule created a capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets, and prohibited banking organizations from making distributions or discretionary bonus
payments during any quarter if its eligible retained income is negative, if the capital conservation buffer is not maintained. This new capital conservation buffer requirement has been phased in beginning in January 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted
assets and increasing each year until being fully implemented in January 2019. The enhanced capital requirements for banking organizations such as the Company and the Bank began January 1, 2015. Other changes included revised risk-weighting of
some assets, stricter limitations on mortgage servicing assets and deferred tax assets, and replacement of the ratings-based approach to risk weight securities.
As of September 30, 2019, the most recent notification from the Federal banking agencies categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective
action. To be categorized as well capitalized the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, common equity Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since that
notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category.
The tables below summarize the Company’s and Bank’s actual and required regulatory capital:
Actual
|
For Capital Adequacy
Purposes
|
To Be Well Capitalized
Under Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
As of September 30, 2019
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$
|
260,576
|
13.31
|
%
|
$
|
156,600
|
8.00
|
%
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
||||||||||||||
Southern Bank
|
253,953
|
13.80
|
%
|
147,199
|
8.00
|
%
|
183,999
|
10.00
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||
Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
238,701
|
12.19
|
%
|
117,450
|
6.00
|
%
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
||||||||||||||||
Southern Bank
|
232,078
|
12.61
|
%
|
110,399
|
6.00
|
%
|
147,199
|
8.00
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
238,701
|
10.77
|
%
|
88,678
|
4.00
|
%
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
||||||||||||||||
Southern Bank
|
232,078
|
10.49
|
%
|
88,524
|
4.00
|
%
|
110,656
|
5.00
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||
Common Equity Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
223,633
|
11.42
|
%
|
88,087
|
4.50
|
%
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
||||||||||||||||
Southern Bank
|
232,078
|
12.61
|
%
|
82,800
|
4.50
|
%
|
119,599
|
6.50
|
%
|
Actual
|
For Capital Adequacy
Purposes
|
To Be Well Capitalized
Under Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
As of June 30, 2019
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$
|
256,982
|
13.22
|
%
|
$
|
155,536
|
8.00
|
%
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
||||||||||||||
Southern Bank
|
247,199
|
12.81
|
%
|
154,364
|
8.00
|
%
|
192,954
|
10.00
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||
Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
235,768
|
12.13
|
%
|
116,652
|
6.00
|
%
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
||||||||||||||||
Southern Bank
|
225,985
|
11.71
|
%
|
115,773
|
6.00
|
%
|
154,364
|
8.00
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
235,768
|
10.81
|
%
|
87,231
|
4.00
|
%
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
||||||||||||||||
Southern Bank
|
225,985
|
10.38
|
%
|
87,077
|
4.00
|
%
|
108,846
|
5.00
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||
Common Equity Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
220,725
|
11.35
|
%
|
87,489
|
4.50
|
%
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
||||||||||||||||
Southern Bank
|
225,985
|
11.71
|
%
|
86,829
|
4.50
|
%
|
125,420
|
6.50
|
%
|
46
PART I: Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
Asset and Liability Management and Market Risk
The goal of the Company’s asset/liability management strategy is to manage the interest rate sensitivity of both interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities in order to
maximize net interest income without exposing the Bank to an excessive level of interest rate risk. The Company employs various strategies intended to manage the potential effect that changing interest rates may have on future operating results.
The primary asset/liability management strategy has been to focus on matching the anticipated re-pricing intervals of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. At times, however, depending on the level of general interest rates, the
relationship between long- and short-term interest rates, market conditions and competitive factors, the Company may determine to increase its interest rate risk position somewhat in order to maintain its net interest margin.
In an effort to manage the interest rate risk resulting from fixed rate lending, the Bank has utilized longer term FHLB advances (with maturities up to ten years), subject to early
redemptions and fixed terms. Other elements of the Company’s current asset/liability strategy include (i) increasing originations of commercial business, commercial real estate, agricultural operating lines, and agricultural real estate loans,
which typically provide higher yields and shorter repricing periods, but inherently increase credit risk; (ii) actively soliciting less rate-sensitive deposits, including aggressive use of the Company’s “rewards checking” product, and (iii)
offering competitively-priced money market accounts and CDs with maturities of up to five years. The degree to which each segment of the strategy is achieved will affect profitability and exposure to interest rate risk.
The Company continues to originate long-term, fixed-rate residential loans. During the first three months of fiscal year 2020, fixed rate 1- to 4-family residential loan production
totaled $27.9 million, as compared to $18.3 million during the same period of the prior fiscal year. At September 30, 2019, the fixed rate residential loan portfolio was $178.5 million with a weighted average maturity of 104 months, as compared to
$163.6 million at September 30, 2018, with a weighted average maturity of 98 months. The Company originated $5.3 million in adjustable-rate 1- to 4-family residential loans during the three-month period ended September 30, 2019, as compared to $8.3
million during the same period of the prior fiscal year. At September 30, 2019, fixed rate loans with remaining maturities in excess of 10 years totaled $51.2 million, or 2.7% of net loans receivable, as compared to $50.3 million, or 3.1% of net
loans receivable at September 30, 2018. The Company originated $47.8 million in fixed rate commercial and commercial real estate loans during the three-month period ended September 30, 2019, as compared to $103.6 million during the same period of
the prior fiscal year. The Company also originated $10.7 million in adjustable rate commercial and commercial real estate loans during the three-month period ended September 30, 2019, as compared to $17.7 million during the same period of the
prior fiscal year. At September 30, 2019, adjustable-rate home equity lines of credit increased to $44.7 million, as compared to $39.9 million at September 30, 2018. At September 30, 2019, the Company’s investment portfolio had an expected
weighted-average life of 3.6 years, compared to 4.1 years at September 30, 2018. Management continues to focus on customer retention, customer satisfaction, and offering new products to customers in order to increase the Company’s amount of less
rate-sensitive deposit accounts.
47
Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis
The following table sets forth as of September 30, 2019, management’s estimates of the projected changes in net portfolio value (“NPV”) in the event of 100, 200, and 300 basis point
(“bp”) instantaneous and permanent increases, and 100, 200, and 300 basis point instantaneous and permanent decreases in market interest rates. Dollar amounts are expressed in thousands.
September 30, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||||||
NPV as Percentage of
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net Portfolio
|
PV of Assets
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Change in Rates
|
Value
|
Change
|
% Change
|
NPV Ratio
|
Change
|
|||||||||||||||
+300 bp
|
$
|
183,647
|
$
|
(46,161
|
)
|
-20
|
%
|
8.69
|
%
|
-1.64
|
%
|
|||||||||
+200 bp
|
198,612
|
(31,196
|
)
|
-14
|
%
|
9.24
|
%
|
-1.09
|
%
|
|||||||||||
+100 bp
|
215,246
|
(14,561
|
)
|
-6
|
%
|
9.84
|
%
|
-0.49
|
%
|
|||||||||||
0 bp
|
229,808
|
-
|
-
|
10.33
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
-100 bp
|
243,852
|
14,044
|
6
|
%
|
10.80
|
%
|
0.47
|
%
|
||||||||||||
-200 bp
|
261,235
|
31,427
|
14
|
%
|
11.45
|
%
|
1.12
|
%
|
||||||||||||
-300 bp
|
270,569
|
40,761
|
18
|
%
|
11.83
|
%
|
1.49
|
%
|
June 30, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||||||
NPV as Percentage of
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net Portfolio
|
PV of Assets
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Change in Rates
|
Value
|
Change
|
% Change
|
NPV Ratio
|
Change
|
|||||||||||||||
+300 bp
|
$
|
173,144
|
$
|
(44,041
|
)
|
-20
|
%
|
8.35
|
%
|
-1.59
|
%
|
|||||||||
+200 bp
|
187,179
|
(30,006
|
)
|
-14
|
%
|
8.88
|
%
|
-1.07
|
%
|
|||||||||||
+100 bp
|
203,703
|
(13,483
|
)
|
-6
|
%
|
9.49
|
%
|
-0.46
|
%
|
|||||||||||
0 bp
|
217,185
|
-
|
-
|
9.94
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
-100 bp
|
229,783
|
12,598
|
6
|
%
|
10.37
|
%
|
0.43
|
%
|
||||||||||||
-200 bp
|
251,078
|
33,893
|
16
|
%
|
11.19
|
%
|
1.25
|
%
|
||||||||||||
-300 bp
|
261,720
|
44,535
|
21
|
%
|
11.63
|
%
|
1.69
|
%
|
Computations of prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on an internally generated model using actual maturity and repricing schedules for the Bank’s
loans and deposits, and are based on numerous assumptions, including relative levels of market interest rates, loan repayments and deposit run-offs, and should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results. Further, the computations do not
contemplate any actions the Bank may undertake in response to changes in interest rates.
Management cannot predict future interest rates or their effect on the Bank’s NPV in the future. Certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the
computation of NPV. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in differing degrees to changes in market interest rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as
adjustable-rate loans, have an initial fixed rate period typically from one to seven years and over the remaining life of the asset changes in the interest rate are restricted. In addition, the proportion of adjustable-rate loans in the Bank’s
portfolios could decrease in future periods due to refinancing activity if market interest rates remain steady in the future. Further, in the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels could deviate significantly
from those assumed in the table. Finally, the ability of many borrowers to service their adjustable-rate debt may decrease in the event of an interest rate increase.
The Bank’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) is responsible for reviewing the Bank’s asset and liability policies. The Board’s Asset/Liability Committees meets monthly to review
interest rate risk and trends, as well as liquidity and capital ratios and requirements. The Bank’s management is responsible for administering the policies and determinations of the Boards with respect to the Bank’s asset and liability goals and
strategies.
48
PART I: Item 4: Controls and Procedures
SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
An evaluation of Southern Missouri Bancorp’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Act”))
as of September 30, 2019, was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and several other members of our senior management. The Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2019, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Act is
(i) accumulated and communicated to management (including the Chief Executive and Financial Officer) in a timely manner, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. There
have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Act) that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2019, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
The Company does not expect that its disclosures and procedures will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide
only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control procedure are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and
instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally,
controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any control procedure also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control procedure, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
49
PART II: Other Information
SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
Item 1: Legal Proceedings
In the opinion of management, the Company is not a party to any pending claims or lawsuits that are expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or
operations. Periodically, there have been various claims and lawsuits involving the Company mainly as a defendant, such as claims to enforce liens, condemnation proceedings on properties in which the Company holds security interests, claims
involving the making and servicing of real property loans and other issues incident to the Bank’s business. Aside from such pending claims and lawsuits, which are incident to the conduct of the Company’s ordinary business, the Company is not a
party to any material pending legal proceedings that would have a material effect on the financial condition or operations of the Company.
Item 1a: Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2019.
Item 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Period
|
Total Number of
Shares (or Units)
Purchased
|
Average Price Paid
per Share (or Unit)
|
Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
|
Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Program
|
|||||||||
7/1/2019 thru 7/31/2019
|
63,758
|
$
|
32.50
|
63,758
|
350,891
|
||||||||
8/1/2019 thru 8/31/2019
|
16,798
|
33.21
|
16,798
|
334,093
|
|||||||||
9/1/2019 thru 9/30/2019
|
5,494
|
33.43
|
5,494
|
328,599
|
|||||||||
Total
|
86,050
|
$
|
32.70
|
86,050
|
328,599
|
Item 3: Defaults upon Senior Securities
Not applicable
Item 4: Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable
Item 5: Other Information
None
50
Item 6: Exhibits
Exhibit Number
|
Document
|
||
3.1(i) |
Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant (filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference) |
||
3.1(i)A |
Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Southern Missouri increasing the authorized capital stock of
Southern Missouri (filed as an exhibit to Southern Missouri's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 21, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference) |
||
3.1(i)B |
Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Southern Missouri increasing the authorized capital stock of
Southern Missouri(filed as an exhibit to Southern Missouri's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 8, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference) |
||
Certificate of Designation for the Registrant’s Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A (filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on July 26, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|||
Bylaws of the Registrant (filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 6, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|||
10
|
Material Contracts:
|
||
Registrant’s 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (attached to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement filed on September 26, 2017, and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
|||
2. |
2008 Equity Incentive Plan (attached to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement filed on September 19,
2008 and incorporated herein by reference) |
||
2003 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (attached to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement filed on September 17, 2003 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
|||
4.
|
Employment and Change-in-control Agreements
|
||
Employment Agreement with Greg A. Steffens
|
|||
Change-in-control Agreement with Kimberly Capps |
|||
Change-in-control Agreement with Matthew Funke |
|||
Change-in-control Agreement with Lora Daves |
|||
Change-in-control Agreement with Justin Cox |
|||
Change-in-control Agreement with Mark Hecker |
|||
Change-in-control Agreement with Rick Windes |
|||
5.
|
Director’s Retirement Agreements
|
||
Director’s Retirement Agreement with Sammy A. Schalk (filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December
31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|||
Director’s Retirement Agreement with Ronnie D. Black (filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December
31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|||
Director’s Retirement Agreement with L. Douglas Bagby (filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December
31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|||
Director’s Retirement Agreement with Rebecca McLane Brooks (filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|||
Director’s Retirement Agreement with Charles R. Love (filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December
31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|||
Director’s Retirement Agreement with Charles R. Moffitt (filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|||
Director’s Retirement Agreement with Dennis C. Robison (filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December
31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|||
Director’s Retirement Agreement with David J. Tooley (filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December
31, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|||
Director’s Retirement Agreement with Todd E. Hensley (filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2015 and
incorporated herein by reference)
|
|||
Tax Sharing Agreement (filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
|||
Named Executive Officer Salary and Bonus Arrangements for 2019 (filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,
2019)
|
|||
Director Fee Arrangements for 2019 (filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2019)
|
|||
Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings(filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2019)
|
|||
Code of Conduct and Ethics (filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2016)
|
|||
Subsidiaries of the Registrant (filed as an exhibit to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2019)
|
|||
Rule 13a-14(a)/15-d14(a) Certifications
Rule 13a-14(a)/15-d14(a) Certifications
|
|||
101
|
Section 1350 Certifications
Attached as Exhibit 101 are the following financial statements from the Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September30, 2019, formatted in Extensive Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) consolidated balance sheets, (ii) consolidated statements of income, (iii) consolidated statements of cash flows and (iv) the notes to consolidated financial
statements.
|
51
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
|
||
Registrant
|
||
Date: November 12, 2019
|
/s/ Greg A. Steffens
|
|
Greg A. Steffens
|
||
President & Chief Executive Officer
|
||
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
||
Date: November 12, 2019
|
/s/ Matthew T. Funke
|
|
Matthew T. Funke
|
||
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
|
||
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
52