e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal
year ended December 31,
2010
|
Or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period from
to
|
Commission file number:
333-50437
Standard Parking Corporation
(Exact Name of
Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
16-1171179
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
900 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 1600, Chicago,
Illinois
60611-1542
(Address of Principal Executive
Offices, Including Zip Code)
(312) 274-2000
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE
$0.001 PER SHARE
(Title of Each Class)
THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET LLC
(Name of Each
Exchange on which Registered)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
As of June 30, 2010, the aggregate market value of the
voting and non-voting common equity held by nonaffiliates of the
registrant was approximately $247.3 million, based on the
closing price of the common stock as reported on the NASDAQ
Global Select Market.
As of March 8, 2011, there were 15,802,545 shares of
common stock of the registrant outstanding.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants definitive proxy statement to
be delivered to shareholders in connection with the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 29, 2011, are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this
Form 10-K.
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
Form 10-K
and the information incorporated by reference herein includes
forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the
Exchange Act. These statements relate to analyses
and other information that are based on forecasts of future
results and estimates of amounts not yet determinable. These
statements also relate to our future prospects, developments and
business strategies. The statements contained in this
Form 10-K,
including information we incorporate by reference, that are not
statements of historical fact may include forward-looking
statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties.
We have used the words anticipate,
believe, could, estimate,
expect, intend, may,
plan, predict, project,
will and similar terms and phrases, including
references to assumptions in this
Form 10-K,
including information we incorporate by reference, to identify
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are
made based on our managements expectations and beliefs
concerning future events affecting us and are subject to
uncertainties and factors relating to our operations and
business environment, all of which are difficult to predict and
many of which are beyond our control. These uncertainties and
factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from
those matters expressed in or implied by these forward-looking
statements. The following factors are among those that may cause
actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking
statements:
|
|
|
|
|
intense competition that can constrain our ability to gain
business and our profitability;
|
|
|
|
the loss, or renewal on less favorable terms, of management
contracts and leases;
|
|
|
|
adverse litigation judgments or settlements resulting from legal
or other proceedings in which we may be involved;
|
|
|
|
the loss of key employees;
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic and business conditions or
demographic trends;
|
|
|
|
the impact of public and private regulations, including changes
in regulations affecting airports and parking lots and new
legislation related to health care;
|
|
|
|
the financial difficulties or bankruptcy of our major clients,
including the impact on our ability to collect receivables;
|
|
|
|
insurance losses that are worse than expected or adverse events
not covered by insurance;
|
|
|
|
labor disputes that lead to a loss of revenues or expense
variations;
|
|
|
|
extraordinary events affecting parking at facilities that we
manage, including emergency safety measures, military or
terrorist attacks, cyber terrorism and natural disasters;
|
|
|
|
state and municipal government clients that sell or enter into
long-term leases of parking-related assets;
|
|
|
|
uncertainty in the credit markets;
|
|
|
|
availability, terms and deployment of capital;
|
|
|
|
the ability to obtain performance bonds on acceptable terms to
guarantee our performance under certain contracts;
|
|
|
|
the other factors discussed under Item 1A, Risk
Factors, and Item 7 Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, and elsewhere in this
Form 10-K.
|
All of our forward-looking statements should be considered in
light of these factors. All of our forward-looking statements
speak only as of the date they were made, and we undertake no
obligation to update our forward-looking statements or risk
factors to reflect new information, future events or otherwise,
except as may be required under applicable securities laws and
regulations.
3
NOTE
PART I
Our
Company
We are one of the leading providers of parking management,
ground transportation and other ancillary services to
commercial, institutional and municipal clients in the United
States and Canada. Our services include a comprehensive set of
on-site
parking management and ground transportation services, which
consist of training, scheduling and supervising all service
personnel as well as providing customer service, marketing,
maintenance and accounting and revenue control functions
necessary to facilitate the operation of our clients
parking facilities. We also provide a range of ancillary
services such as airport shuttle operations, taxi and livery
dispatch services and municipal meter revenue collection and
enforcement services. We strive to be the #1 or #2
provider in each of the core markets in which we operate. As a
given geographic market achieves a threshold operational size,
we typically will establish a local office in order to promote
increased operating efficiency. We rely on both organic growth
and acquisitions to increase our client base and leverage our
fixed corporate and administrative costs within each major
metropolitan area. Our clients choose to outsource with us in
order to attract, service and retain customers, gain access to
the breadth and depth of our service and process expertise,
leverage our significant technology capabilities and enhance
their parking facility revenue, profitability and cash flow. As
of December 31, 2010, we managed approximately 2,100
parking facility locations containing over one million parking
spaces in approximately 341 cities, operated 25
parking-related service centers serving 64 airports, operated a
fleet of approximately 540 shuttle buses carrying approximately
27 million passengers per year and employed a professional
staff of approximately 12,000 people.
We have provided parking services since 1929. Our history and
resulting experience have allowed us to develop and standardize
a rigorous system of processes and controls that enable us to
deliver consistent, transparent, value-added and high quality
parking facility management services. We serve a variety of
industries and have end-market specific specialization in
airports, healthcare facilities, hotels, municipalities and
government facilities, commercial real estate, residential
communities, retail and colleges and universities. We market and
offer our end-market specific services under our SP
Plus®
brand. The professionals dedicated to each of our SP
Plus®
markets and service lines possess subject matter expertise that
enables them to meet the specific demands of their clients.
Additionally, we complement our core services and help to
differentiate our clients parking facilities by offering
to their customers Ambiance in
Parking®,
an approach to parking facility management that includes a
comprehensive package of amenity and customer service programs.
These programs not only make the parking experience more
enjoyable, but also convey a sense of the clients
sensitivity to and appreciation for the needs of its parking
customers. In doing so, we believe the programs serve to enhance
the value of the parking properties themselves.
We have also dedicated significant resources to human capital
management, providing comprehensive training for our employees,
delivered primarily through the use of our web-based Standard
UniversitySM learning management system, which promotes
customer service and client retention in addition to providing
our employees with continued training and career development
opportunities. Our focus on customer service and satisfaction is
a key driver of our high location retention rate, which was
approximately 87% for the year ended December 31, 2009 and
91% for the year ended December 31, 2010.
We operate our clients facilities through two types of
arrangements: management contracts and leases. As of
December 31, 2010, we operated approximately 90% of our
locations under management contracts, and for the year ended
December 31, 2010, we derived approximately 88% of our
gross profit under management contracts. As of December 31,
2010, we operated approximately 10% of our locations under
leases, and for the year ended December 31, 2010, we
derived approximately 12% of our gross profit under leases.
|
|
|
|
|
Under a management contract, we typically receive a base monthly
fee for managing the facility, and we may also receive an
incentive fee based on the achievement of facility performance
objectives. We
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
also receive fees for ancillary services. Typically, all of the
underlying revenue and expenses under a standard management
contract flow through to our client rather than to us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under a lease, we generally pay to the property owner either a
fixed annual rent, a percentage of gross customer collections,
or a combination of both. Under a lease, we collect all revenue
and are responsible for most operating expenses, but typically
we are not responsible for major maintenance, capital
expenditures or real estate taxes.
|
Our focus on recurring, predominantly fixed-fee management
contracts provides us with a measure of insulation from broader
economic cycles and enhance our visibility and relative
predictability because our management contract revenue does not
fluctuate materially in relation to variations in parking
volumes. Additionally, we are positioned to benefit from
improving macroeconomic conditions and increased parking volumes
through our exposure to lease contracts. We believe our revenue
model and contract structure mix provides a competitive
advantage when compared with competitors in our industry.
Our revenue is derived from a broad and diverse group of
clients, industry end-markets and geographies. Our clients
include some of North Americas largest private and public
owners, municipalities, managers and developers of major office
buildings, residential properties, commercial properties,
shopping centers and other retail properties, sports and special
event complexes, hotels, and hospitals and medical centers. No
single client accounted for more than 5.7% of our revenue or
more than 5.6% of our gross profit for the year ended
December 31, 2010. Additionally, we have built a diverse
geographic footprint that as of December 31, 2010 included
operations in 42 states and the District of Columbia, and
municipalities, including New York, Los Angeles, Chicago,
Boston, Washington D.C. and Houston, among others, and five
Canadian provinces. Our strategy is focused on building scale
and leadership positions in large, strategic markets in order to
leverage the advantages of scale across a larger number of
parking locations in a single market. We strive to be the
#1 or #2 provider in each of the core markets in which
we operate.
One of the key differentiators in our industry is the effective
use of technology, which is of increasing importance to our
clients. Our commitment to the application of technology in the
parking facility management industry has resulted in the
creation of a proprietary product, Client ViewTM, which
is an on-demand system that enables our clients, at their
convenience, to directly access and download their monthly
financial statements and detailed
back-up
reports. Additionally, we believe we are a leader in the field
of introducing automation and technology as part of our parking
facility operations, having been among the first to introduce
airport credit card lanes, apply bar code decal technology and
adopt various electronic payment options such as electronic fund
transfer (EFT) payments and
pay-on-foot
machine (ATM) technology. Our electronic, web-based
Procure-To-Pay procurement and payment system controls
costs by automatically enforcing procurement policies and
efficiently processing the associated payables. Our propriety
Click and
Park®
technology enables people to reserve and purchase parking
online, in advance, both for sporting and special events as well
as in a wide array of other commercial parking environments.
Similarly, our propriety Click and Ridesm technology lets
people reserve and pay for bus seating online. We recently
introduced our proprietary MPM
Plustm monthly
parker management and billing system, which provides
comprehensive and reliable billing of the parking-related
provisions of multi-year commercial tenant leases. We believe
that automation and technology can enhance customer convenience,
improve cash management and increase overall profitability for
our clients, as well as allow us to add new locations and expand
our operations into new markets more effectively.
Industry
Overview
Overview
The parking industry is large and fragmented and includes
companies that provide temporary parking spaces for vehicles on
an hourly, daily, weekly, or monthly basis along with providing
various ancillary services. A substantial number of companies in
the industry offer parking services as a non-core operation in
connection with property management or ownership, and the vast
majority of companies in the industry are small, private and
operate a single parking facility. As such, the industry remains
highly fragmented. The industry experiences consolidation from
time to time, as smaller operators find that they lack the
financial
5
resources, economies of scale and management techniques required
to compete with larger national providers. We expect this trend
to continue and will provide larger parking management companies
with opportunities to expand their businesses and acquire
smaller operators.
Industry
Operating Arrangements
Parking facilities operate under three general types of
arrangements:
|
|
|
|
|
management contracts;
|
|
|
|
leases; and
|
|
|
|
ownership.
|
The general terms and benefits of these three types of
arrangements are as follows:
Management Contracts. Under a management
contract, the facility operator generally receives a base
monthly fee for managing the facility and may receive an
incentive fee based on the achievement of facility performance
objectives. Facility operators also generally charge fees for
various ancillary services such as accounting, equipment leasing
and consulting. Primary responsibilities under a management
contract include hiring, training and staffing parking
personnel, and providing revenue collection, accounting,
record-keeping, insurance and facility marketing services. Under
a typical management contract, the facility operator is not
responsible for structural or mechanical repairs, or for
providing security or guard services. The facility owner usually
is responsible for operating expenses associated with the
facilitys operation, such as taxes, license and permit
fees, insurance costs, payroll and accounts receivable
processing and wages of personnel assigned to the facility,
although some management contracts, typically referred to as
reverse management contracts, require the facility
operator to pay certain of these cost categories but provide for
payment to the operator of a larger management fee. Under a
management contract, the facility owner usually is responsible
for non- routine maintenance, repair costs and capital
improvements. Management contracts are typically for a term of
one to three years (although the contracts may often be
terminated, without cause, on 30 days notice or less)
and may contain a renewal clause. As of December 31, 2010,
we operated approximately 90% of our locations under management
contracts, and for the year ended December 31, 2010, we
derived approximately 88% of our gross profit under management
contracts.
Leases. Under a lease, the parking facility
operator generally pays to the property owner either a fixed
base rent, percentage rent that is tied to the facilitys
financial performance, or a combination of both. The parking
facility operator collects all revenue and is responsible for
most operating expenses, but typically is not responsible for
major maintenance, capital expenditures or real estate taxes. In
contrast to management contracts, leases typically are for terms
of three to ten years, often contain a renewal term, and provide
for a fixed payment to the facility owner regardless of the
facilitys operating earnings. However, many of these
leases may be cancelled by the client for various reasons,
including development of the real estate for other uses. Some
leases may be cancelled by the client on as little as
30 days notice without cause. Leased facilities
generally require a longer commitment and a larger capital
investment by the parking facility operator than do managed
facilities. As of December 31, 2010, we operated
approximately 10% of our locations under leases, and for the
year ended December 31, 2010, we derived approximately 12%
of our gross profit under leases.
Ownership. Ownership of parking facilities,
either independently or through joint ventures, entails greater
potential risks and rewards than either managed or leased
facilities. All owned facility revenue flows directly to the
owner, and the owner has the potential to realize benefits of
appreciation in the value of the underlying real estate.
Ownership of parking facilities usually requires large capital
investments, and the owner is responsible for all obligations
related to the property, including all structural, mechanical
and electrical maintenance and repairs and property taxes. We do
not own any parking facilities.
6
Industry
Growth Dynamics
A number of industry trends should facilitate growth for larger
outsourced commercial parking facility management providers,
including the following:
Opportunities From Large Property Managers, Owners and
Developers. As a result of past industry
consolidation, there is a significant number of national
property managers, owners and developers that own or manage
multiple locations. Sophisticated property owners consider
parking a profit center that experienced parking facility
management companies can maximize. This dynamic favors larger
parking facility operators that can provide specialized,
value-added professional services with nationwide coverage.
Outsourcing of Parking Management and Related
Services. Growth in the parking management
industry has resulted from a trend by parking facility owners to
outsource the management of their parking and related operations
to independent operators. We believe that entities such as large
property managers, owners and developers, as well as cities,
municipal authorities, hospitals and universities, in an effort
to focus on their core competencies, reduce operating budgets
and increase efficiency and profitability, will continue and
perhaps increase the practice of retaining parking management
companies to operate facilities and provide related services,
including shuttle bus operations, municipal meter collection and
valet parking.
Vendor Consolidation. Based on interactions
with our clients, we believe that many parking facility owners
and managers are evaluating the benefits of reducing the number
of parking facility management relationships they maintain. We
believe this is a function of the need to reduce costs
associated with interacting with a large number of third-party
suppliers coupled with the need to foster closer inter-company
relationships. By limiting the number of outsourcing vendors,
companies will benefit from suppliers who will invest the time
and effort to understand every facet of the clients
business and industry and who can effectively manage and handle
all aspects of their daily requirements. We believe a trend
towards vendor consolidation can benefit a company like ours,
given our national footprint and scale, extensive experience,
broad process capabilities and a demonstrated ability to create
value for our clients.
Industry Consolidation. The parking management
industry is highly fragmented, with hundreds of small regional
or local operators. We believe national parking facility
operators have a competitive advantage over local and regional
operators by reason of their:
|
|
|
|
|
broad product and service offerings;
|
|
|
|
deeper and more experienced management;
|
|
|
|
relationships with large, national property managers, developers
and owners;
|
|
|
|
efficient cost structure due to economies of scale; and
|
|
|
|
financial resources to invest in infrastructure and information
systems.
|
Our
Competitive Strengths
We believe we have the following key competitive strengths:
Leading Market Position with a Unique Value
Proposition. We are one of the leading providers
of parking management, ground transportation and other ancillary
services, to commercial, institutional, and municipal clients in
the United States and Canada. We strive to be the #1
or #2 provider in each of the core markets in which we
operate. We market and offer many of our services under our SP
Plus®
brand, which reflects our ability to provide customized
solutions and meet the varied demands of our diverse end-markets
and supplement them with Ambiance in
Parking®,
a comprehensive package of amenity and customer service
programs. We believe our ability to offer a comprehensive range
of services on a national basis is a significant competitive
advantage and allows our clients to attract, service and retain
7
customers, gain access to the breadth and depth of our service
and process expertise, leverage our significant technology
capabilities and enhance their parking facility revenue,
profitability and cash flow.
Our Scale and Diversification. As of
December 31, 2010, we managed approximately 2,100 parking
facility locations containing over one million parking spaces in
approximately 341 cities, operated 25 parking-related
service centers serving 64 airports, operated a fleet of
approximately 540 shuttle buses and employed a professional
staff of approximately 12,000 people. We benefit from
diversification across our client base, industry end-markets and
geographic locations.
|
|
|
|
|
Client Base. Our clients include some of the
nations largest private and public owners, municipalities,
managers and developers of major office buildings, residential
properties, commercial properties, shopping centers and other
retail properties, sports and special event complexes, hotels,
and hospitals and medical centers. No single client accounted
for more than 5.7% of our revenue or more than 5.6% of our gross
profit for the year ended December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
Industry End-Markets. We believe that our
industry end-market diversification allows us to minimize our
exposure to industry-specific seasonality and volatility. We
believe that the breadth of end-markets we serve and the depth
of services we offer to those end-markets provide us with a
broader base of customers that we can target.
|
|
|
|
Geographic Locations. We have a diverse
geographic footprint that includes operations in 42 states
and the District of Columbia and 5 Canadian provinces as of
December 31, 2010. We strive to be the #1 or #2
provider in each of the core markets in which we operate, and
our strategy is focused on building size and leadership
positions in large, strategic markets in order to leverage the
advantages of scale across a larger number of parking locations
in a single market.
|
Additionally, our scale has enabled us to significantly enhance
our operating efficiency over the past several years by
standardizing processes and managing overhead costs.
Stable Client Relationships. We have a track
record of providing our clients and parking customers with a
consistent, value-added and high quality parking facility
management experience, as reflected by our high location
retention rate, which was approximately 87% for the year ended
December 31, 2009, and 91% for the year ended
December 31, 2010. These statistics include the impact of
our decision to exit from unprofitable contracts. As our clients
continue to outsource the management of their parking operations
and look to consolidate the number of their outsourcing
providers, we believe this trend can benefit companies like
ours, which has a national footprint and scale, extensive
experience, broad process capabilities, and a demonstrated
ability to create value for our clients.
Established Platform for Future Growth. We
have invested resources and developed a national infrastructure
and technology platform which is complemented by significant
management expertise that allows us to scale our business for
future growth effectively and efficiently. We have the ability
to transition into a new location very quickly, from the
simplest to the most complex operation, and have experience
working with incumbent facility managers to effect smooth and
efficient takeovers and integrate new locations seamlessly into
our operations.
Visible and Predictable Business Model. We
believe that our business model provides us with a measure of
insulation from broader economic cycles because approximately
88% of our gross profit for the year ended December 31,
2010 was generated from fixed-fee and reverse management fee
management contracts that for the most part are not dependent
upon the level of utilization of those parking facilities.
Additionally, because we do not own any parking facilities, we
have few of the risks of real estate ownership. We benefit
further from visibility provided by a recurring revenue model
reinforced by contract retention rates that have approximated
90% over the past five years.
Highly Capital Efficient Business with Attractive Cash Flow
Characteristics. Our business generates
attractive cash flow due to negative working capital dynamics
and our low capital expenditure requirements. For the fiscal
year December 31, 2009, we generated approximately
$21.8 million of cash flow from operating activities, and
our capital expenditures for the purpose of leasehold
improvements
8
and equipment were $3.5 million. For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2010, we generated approximately
$19.5 million of cash flow from operating activities, and
during the same period our capital expenditures for the purpose
of leasehold improvements and equipment were $3.0 million.
Focus on Operational Excellence and Human Capital
Management. Our culture and training programs
place a continuing focus on excellence in the execution of all
aspects of day-to-day parking facility operation. This focus is
reflected in our ability to deliver to our clients a
professional, high-quality product through well-trained,
service-oriented personnel, which we believe differentiates us
from our competitors. To support our focus on operational
excellence, we manage our human capital through a comprehensive,
structured program that evaluates the competencies and
performance of all of our key operations and administrative
support personnel on an annual basis. Based on those
evaluations, we create detailed developmental plans designed to
provide our personnel with the skills and tools needed to
perform their current duties effectively and to prepare
themselves for future growth and advancement. We have also
dedicated significant resources to human capital management,
providing comprehensive training for our employees, delivered
primarily through the use of our web-based Standard
UniversitySM learning management system, which promotes
customer service and client retention in addition to providing
our employees with continued training and career development
opportunities.
Experienced Management Team. Our current
senior management team has a proven track record of growing our
existing business organically and consistently integrating
acquisitions. The team combines over 190 years of industry
experience, including an average of approximately 23 years
with us or with our acquired companies.
Our
Growth Strategy
Building on these competitive strengths, we believe we are
well-positioned to execute on the following growth strategies:
Grow Our Portfolio of Contracts in Existing Geographic
Markets. Our strategy is to capitalize on
economies of scale and operating efficiencies by expanding our
contract portfolio in our existing geographic markets,
especially in our core markets. We market our services in each
of our existing geographic markets with the goal of becoming
the #1 or #2 provider in that market. As a given
geographic market achieves a threshold operational size, we
typically will establish a local office in order to promote
increased operating efficiency by enabling local managers to use
a common staff for recruiting, training and human resources
support. This concentration of operating locations allows for
increased operating efficiency and superior levels of customer
service and retention through the accessibility of local
managers and support resources. We rely on both organic growth
and acquisitions to increase our client base and leverage our
fixed corporate and administrative costs within each major
metropolitan area.
Increase Penetration in Our Current Vertical
End-Markets. We believe that a significant
opportunity exists for us to expand our presence into certain
industry end-markets, such as colleges and universities,
hospitals and medical centers as well as municipalities. In
order to effectively target these new markets, we have
implemented a go-to-market strategy of aligning our business by
vertical end-markets and branding our domain expertise through
our SP
Plus®
market designations to highlight the specialized expertise and
services that we provide to meet the needs of each particular
industry and customer. This combination, in turn, allows us to
deliver high quality and consistent services for our clients,
enhances customer loyalty and allows us to further leverage our
service capabilities, technology platform and regional and
market-based management structure.
Expand and Cross-Sell Additional Services to Drive
Incremental Revenue. We believe we have
significant opportunities to strengthen our relationships with
existing clients and to attract new clients by continuing to
cross-sell value-added services that complement our core parking
operations. These services include shuttle bus operations, taxi
and livery dispatch services, concierge-type ground
transportation, on-street parking meter collection and facility
maintenance services. We also are evaluating new service
opportunities, such as security services, that would leverage
our core competency of managing large
9
networks of geographically dispersed employees. To better
reflect these broader competencies, we developed the SP
Plus®
brand, which emphasizes our specialized market expertise and
distinguish our service lines from the traditional parking
services we provide. Our SP
Plus®
brand includes market designations such as SP
Plus®
Airport Services, SP
Plus®
Healthcare Services, SP
Plus®
Hotel Services, SP
Plus®
Municipal Services, SP
Plus®
Office Services, SP
Plus®
Residential Services, SP
Plus®
Retail Services and SP
Plus®
University Services, which reflect the market-specific subject
matter expertise that enables our professionals to meet the
varied demands of those environments. Because our capabilities
range beyond parking facility management, our SP
Plus®
Transportation, SP
Plus®
Maintenance and SP
Plus®
Security Services brands more clearly distinguish those service
lines from the traditional parking services that we provide
under our Standard Parking brand. By offering this wide
assortment of ancillary services, we are able to broaden the
scope of our client relationships and thus increase our
clients reliance and dependency on our services, which in
turn results in enhanced client retention rates and higher
revenue and gross profit per location.
Expand Our Geographic Platform. We believe
that opportunities exist to develop new geographic markets
either through new contract wins, acquisitions, alliances or
partnerships. Clients who outsource the management of their
parking operations often have a presence in a variety of urban
markets and seek to outsource the management of their parking
facilities to a national provider. We intend to leverage
relationships with existing clients that have locations in
multiple markets as one potential entry point into developing
new core markets. Additionally, we may continue to pursue
acquisitions as a means of gaining critical mass in a new market.
Continued Focus on Management Contracts and Operational
Efficiencies to Further Improve Profitability. We
continue to focus on the growth of lower-risk management
contracts, which are inherently more predictable. We have
invested substantial resources in information technology and
have identified a number of internal initiatives to consolidate
various corporate functions and improve our processes and
service offerings. In addition, we will continue to evaluate and
improve our human capital management to ensure a consistent and
high-level of service for our clients. These efficiency measures
have improved our cost structure and enhanced our financial
strength, which we believe will continue to yield future
benefits.
Pursue Opportunistic, Accretive
Acquisitions. The outsourced parking management
industry remains highly fragmented and presents a significant
opportunity for us. Given the scale in our operating platform,
we have a demonstrated ability to successfully identify, acquire
and integrate accretive tuck-in acquisitions. For example, in
July 2009, we acquired the assets of Gameday Management Group,
U.S., an Orlando-based company that plans the operation of
transportation and parking systems for major stadium and
sporting events. Gameday has provided its transportation and
traffic management services for high-profile events, including
Super Bowls XXX-XLIV, the Daytona 500, the 2009 Presidential
Inauguration, and the 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics. This
acquisition will enable us to provide our stadium and special
event clients with transportation and parking planning expertise
that can meet their most complex needs. We also expect to
leverage Gamedays expertise into new parking and
transportation opportunities in the future. Among the assets
acquired is Gamedays Click and ParkSM online parking and
traffic management system, which enables parking customers to
reserve and pay for parking online in advance of an event. The
addition of this capability to our product line is an example of
how we are integrating technology into a changing parking
industry. We will continue to selectively pursue acquisition
opportunities that help us acquire scale or enhance our service
capabilities.
In December 2010 we acquired Expert Parking, Inc., a
Philadelphia-based parking management company having parking
operations at twenty-six locations throughout the greater
Philadelphia metropolitan area. The Expert Parking operations
span a diverse variety of property types that include office,
hotel, residential, municipal, hospital, university and
commercial locations. The acquisition complements our operations
in New York and New Jersey, and enhances our prospects for
growth throughout the Northeast corridor.
We also provide a range of ancillary services to satisfy client
needs such as municipal meter collection.
10
Services
As a professional parking management company, we provide a
comprehensive, turn-key package of parking services to our
clients. Under a typical management contract structure, we are
responsible for providing and supervising all personnel
necessary to facilitate daily parking operations including
cashiers, porters, valet attendants, managers, bookkeepers, and
a variety of maintenance, marketing, customer service, and
accounting and revenue control functions. By way of example, our
typical day-to-day operating duties, whether performed using our
own personnel or subcontracted vendors, include:
|
|
|
|
|
Collection and deposit of daily and monthly parking revenues
from all parking customers.
|
|
|
|
Daily housekeeping to maintain the facility in a clean and
orderly manner.
|
|
|
|
Restriping of the parking stalls as necessary.
|
|
|
|
Routine maintenance of parking equipment (e.g., ticket
dispensing machines, parking gate arms, fee computers).
|
|
|
|
Marketing efforts designed to maximize gross parking revenues.
|
|
|
|
Delivery of courteous and professional customer relations.
|
|
|
|
Painting of walkways, curbs, ceilings, walls or other facility
surfaces.
|
|
|
|
Snow removal from sidewalks and driveways.
|
The scope of our management services typically also includes a
number of functions that support the basic daily facility
operations, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
Preparation of an annual operating budget reflecting our
estimates of the annual gross parking revenues that the facility
will generate from its parking customers, as well as the costs
and expenses to be incurred in connection with the
facilitys operation.
|
|
|
|
Evaluation and analysis of, and consultation with our clients
with respect to, price structures that will optimize our
clients revenue objectives.
|
|
|
|
Consultation with our clients regarding which of our customer
amenities are appropriate
and/or
desirable for implementation at the clients parking
facility.
|
|
|
|
Implementation of a wide range of operational and revenue
control processes and procedures, including internal audit
procedures, designed to maximize and protect the facilitys
parking revenues. Compliance with our mandated processes and
procedures is supervised by dedicated internal audit and
contract compliance groups.
|
|
|
|
Consultation with our clients regarding any recommended
modifications in facility design or traffic flow, or the
installation of new or updated parking equipment, designed both
to enhance the ease and convenience of the parking experience
for the parking customers and to maximize facility profitability.
|
|
|
|
Monthly reporting to our clients regarding the facilitys
operating results. For those clients who wish to directly access
their financial reporting information on-line, we offer the use
of our proprietary Client ViewSM client reporting system,
which provides on-line access to site-level financial and
operating information.
|
Ancillary
Services
Beyond the conventional parking facility management services
described above, we also offer an expanded range of ancillary
services. For example:
|
|
|
|
|
At various airports throughout the United States, we provide
shuttle bus vehicles and the drivers to operate them in support
of on-airport car rental operations as well as private
off-airport parking locations.
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
At certain airports, we provide ancillary ground transportation
services, such as taxi and livery dispatch services, as well as
concierge-type ground transportation information and support
services for arriving passengers.
|
|
|
|
For municipalities, we provide basic shuttle bus services,
on-street parking meter collection and other forms of parking
enforcement services.
|
|
|
|
Within the medical center and hospital market, we provide valet
parking and shuttle bus services.
|
Amenities
and Customer Service Programs
We offer a comprehensive package of amenity and customer service
programs, branded as Ambiance in
Parking®,
that can be provided to our customers, many at nominal or no
cost to the client. These programs not only make the parking
experience more enjoyable, but also convey a sense of the
clients sensitivity to and appreciation of the needs of
its parking customers. In doing so, we believe the programs
serve to enhance the value of the parking properties themselves.
Musical Theme Floor Reminder System. Our
musical theme floor reminder system is designed to help
customers remember the garage level on which they parked. A
different song is played on each floor of the parking garage.
Each floor also displays distinctive signage and graphics that
correspond with the floors theme. For example, in one
parking facility with U.S. colleges as a theme, a different
college logo is displayed, and that colleges specific
fight song is heard, on each parking level. Other parking
facilities have themes such as famous recording artists, musical
instruments, and professional sports teams.
Books-To-Go®
CD Library. Monthly customers can
borrow free of charge audio CD to which
they can listen as they drive to and from work. A wide selection
of fiction, non-fiction and business titles is maintained in the
facility office.
Films-To-Go®
DVD Library. This amenity builds on the
success of our popular
Books-To-Go®
program. DVDs of many popular movie titles are stocked in the
parking facility office and made available free of charge to
monthly customers. The movie selections are updated on a regular
basis.
SPokes. With our newest garage amenity
program, monthly parkers at participating facilities can check
out a cruiser bike, free of charge, for their personal use.
Parking customers make their reservations through the facility
manager, and all riders are provided with helmets. Returned
bikes and helmets are inspected and cleaned by a facility
employee before reuse.
Complimentary Driver Assistance
Services. Parking facility attendants provide a
wide range of complimentary services to customers with car
problems. Assistance can include charging weak batteries,
inflating/changing tires, cleaning windshields and refilling
windshield washer fluid. Attendants also can help customers
locate their vehicles and escort them to their cars.
Standard Equipment & Technology Upgrade
Program®
Services
(SETUP®). Standard
Parking provides clients with a complete turnkey solution to
managing all phases of new equipment projects, from initial
design to installation to ongoing maintenance. Our design team
will suggest a complete solution intended to return to our
clients the greatest value for their investment based upon
consideration of a wide array of choices as to both equipment
(such as
Pay-On-Foot,
Automated Vehicle Identification and Automated Credit/Debit Card
machine technology) and services (procurement, project
management, installation and maintenance).
Standard Road
Assist®
Emergency Services. Parking customers
experiencing vehicle problems beyond weak batteries and low tire
pressure call our toll-free number to receive, on a
pay-per-use
basis, a basic package of emergency services, including towing
up to five miles, jump starting, flat tire changing, fuel
delivery, extracting a vehicle from the side of the road and
lock-out service. The emergency services are provided at the
parking facility or anywhere on the road.
CarCare Maintenance Services. A car service
vendor will
pick-up a
customers car from the parking facility, contact the
customer with an estimate, service the car during normal working
hours and return it to the facility before the end of the
business day.
12
ParkNet®
Traffic Information System. The system
provides customers with continuously updated traffic reports on
a site-specific basis so that drivers can learn not only about
traffic conditions on the area highways, but also about
conditions in the immediate vicinity of the parking facility.
Automated Teller
Machines. On-site
ATM machines provide customers access to cash from bankcards and
credit cards. We arrange for the installation of the machine,
operated and maintained by an outside vendor. The parking
facility realizes supplemental income from a fixed monthly rent
and a share of usage transaction fees.
Complimentary Courtesy Umbrellas and
Flashlights. Courtesy umbrellas are loaned to
customers on rainy days. A similar lending program can be
implemented to provide flashlights in emergency situations or
power outages.
Complimentary Services/Customer Appreciation
Days. Our clients select from a variety of
complimentary services that we provide as a special way of
saying thank you to our parking customers. Depending
on client preferences, coffee, donuts
and/or
newspapers occasionally are provided to customers during the
morning rush hour. On certain holidays, candy, with wrappers
that can be customized with the facility logo, can be
distributed to customers as they exit. We also can distribute
personalized promotional items, such as ice scrapers and
key-chains.
Business
Development
Our efforts to attract new clients are primarily concentrated in
and coordinated by a dedicated business development group, whose
background and expertise is in the field of sales and marketing,
and whose financial compensation is determined to a significant
extent by their business development success. This business
development group is responsible for forecasting sales,
maintaining a pipeline of prospective and existing clients,
initiating contacts with such clients, and then following
through to coordinate meetings involving those clients and the
appropriate members of our operations hierarchy. By
concentrating our sales efforts through this dedicated group, we
enable our operations personnel to focus on achieving excellence
in our parking facility operations and maximizing our
clients parking profits and our own profitability.
We also place a specific focus on marketing and client
relationship efforts that pertain to those clients having a
large regional or national presence. Accordingly, we assign a
dedicated executive to those clients to address any existing
portfolio issues, as well as to reinforce existing and develop
new account relationships and to take any other action that may
further our business development interests.
Operations
We maintain regional and city offices throughout the United
States and Canada in order to support approximately
12,000 employees and approximately 2,100 locations. These
offices serve as the central bases through which we provide the
employees to staff our parking facilities as well as the
on-site and
support management staff to oversee those operations. Our
administrative staff accountants are based in those same offices
and facilitate the efficient, accurate and timely production and
delivery to our clients of our monthly reports. Having these
all-inclusive operations and accounting teams located in
regional and city offices throughout the United States and
Canada allows us to add new locations quickly and in a
cost-efficient manner. To facilitate the training of our
facility personnel throughout the country, we have created
Standard Universitysm, the foundation of all our formal
training programs that span a wide range of topics including
soft skills, technology, software, leadership skills and
operating procedures. Courses are deployed using a multitude of
methods including classroom sessions, web-based sessions, and
self-managed, computer-based training. Standard
Universitysm is available to our employees on a 24/7 basis
so they may access training and information when they
need it.
Our overall basic corporate functions in the areas of finance,
human resources, risk management, legal, purchasing and
procurement, general administration, strategy and information
and technology are based in our Chicago corporate office. The
Chicago corporate office also supports and promotes consistency
throughout our field operations by developing and administering
our operational, financial and administrative policies,
practices and procedures.
13
Clients
and Properties
Our client base includes a diverse cross-section of public and
private owners of commercial, institutional and municipal real
estate. No single client represented more than 5.7% of revenues
or more than 5.6% of our gross profit for the year ended
December 31, 2010. For the years ended December 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009, we retained an average of 91%
and 87%, respectively, of our locations (which statistic
includes the impact of our decision to exit from unprofitable
contracts).
Information
Technology
We believe that automation and technology can enhance customer
convenience, lower labor costs, improve cash management and
increase overall profitability. We have been a leader in the
field of introducing automation and technology to the parking
business and we were among the first to adopt electronic fund
transfer (EFT) payment options,
pay-on-foot
(ATM) technology and bar code decal technology. Our proprietary
Click and
Park®
technology enables people to reserve and purchase parking
online, in advance, both for sporting and special events as well
as in a wide array of other commercial parking environments. At
many locations, Click and
Park®
users also can get customized directions showing what route
to take to get to their parking destination most efficiently.
Similarly, our proprietary Click and Ridesm system lets
people reserve and pay for bus seating online, in advance. We
recently introduced our proprietary MPM
Plustm monthly
parker management and billing system, which provides
comprehensive and reliable billing of the parking-related
provisions of multi-year commercial tenant leases.
To promote internal efficiency, we have created advanced
information systems that connect local offices across the
country to our corporate headquarters. These systems support
accounting, financial management and reporting practices,
general operating procedures, training, employment policies,
cash controls and marketing procedures. Our commitment to the
application of technology in the parking management business has
resulted in the creation of a proprietary product, Client
Viewtm, an
Internet-based system that gives our clients the flexibility and
convenience to access and download their monthly financials and
detailed
back-up
reports. In addition, use of our electronic, web-based
Procure-To-Pay procurement and payment system controls
costs by automatically enforcing procurement policies and
efficiently processing the associated payables. We believe that
our standardized processes and controls enhance our ability to
successfully add new locations and expand our operations into
new markets.
Employees
As of December 31, 2010, we employed 11,971 individuals,
including 6,824 full-time and 5,147 part-time
employees. As of December 31, 2009, we employed 11,970
individuals, including 7,110 full-time and
4,860 part-time employees. Approximately 29% of our
employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. No
single collective bargaining agreement covers a material number
of employees. We believe that our employee relations are good.
Insurance
We purchase comprehensive liability insurance covering certain
claims that occur in the operations that we lease or manage. The
primary amount of such coverage is $2.0 million per
occurrence and $2.0 million in the aggregate per facility
for our garage liability and garage keepers legal liability
coverages. In addition, we purchase workers compensation
insurance for all eligible employees and umbrella/excess
liability coverage. Under our various liability and
workers compensation insurance policies, we are obligated
to reimburse the insurance carrier for the first $250,000 of any
loss. As a result, we are, in effect, self-insured for all
claims up to that deductible level. We utilize a third-party
administrator to process and pay claims. We also purchase
property insurance that provides coverage for loss or damage to
our property and in some cases our clients property, as
well as business interruption coverage for lost operating income
and certain associated expenses. The deductible applicable to
any given loss under our property insurance policy varies based
upon the insured values and the peril that causes the loss. We
also purchase group health insurance with respect to eligible
full-time employees and family members (whether such employees
work at leased or managed facilities) and are fully-insured for
all covered expenses. We believe that our insurance coverage is
adequate and consistent with industry practice.
14
Because of the size of the operations covered and our claims
experience, we purchase insurance policies at prices that we
believe represent a discount to the prices that would typically
be charged to parking facility owners on a stand-alone basis.
The clients for whom we operate parking facilities pursuant to
management contracts have the option of purchasing their own
liability insurance policies (provided that we are named as an
additional insured pursuant to an additional insured
endorsement), but historically most of our clients have chosen
to obtain insurance coverage by being named as additional
insureds under our master liability insurance policies. Pursuant
to our management contracts we charge to such clients an
allocated portion of our insurance-related costs at rates that
we believe are competitive.
Competition
The parking industry is fragmented and highly competitive, with
limited barriers to entry. We face direct competition for
additional facilities to manage or lease, while our facilities
themselves compete with nearby facilities for our parking
customers and in the labor market generally for qualified
employees. Moreover, the construction of new parking facilities
near our existing facilities can adversely affect our business.
There are only a few national parking management companies that
compete with us. We also face competition from numerous smaller,
locally owned independent parking operators, as well as from
developers, hotels, national financial services companies and
other institutions that manage their own parking facilities as
well as facilities owned by others. Many municipalities and
other governmental entities also operate their own parking
facilities, potentially eliminating those facilities as
management or lease opportunities for us. Some of our present
and potential competitors have or may obtain greater financial
and marketing resources than us, which may negatively impact our
ability to retain existing contracts and gain new contracts. We
face significant competition in our efforts to provide ancillary
services such as shuttle bus services and on-street parking
enforcement because several large companies specialize in these
services.
Regulation
Under various federal, state and local environmental laws,
ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or
operator of real property may be liable for the costs of removal
or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in
such property. Such laws typically impose liability without
regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was
responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic
substances. In connection with the operation of parking
facilities, we may be potentially liable for any such costs. In
addition, from time to time we are involved in environmental
issues at certain of our locations or in connection with our
operations. While it is difficult to predict the ultimate
outcome of any of these matters, based on information currently
available, management believes that none of these matters,
individually or in the aggregate, are reasonably likely to have
a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows. The cost of defending against claims
of liability, or of remediating a contaminated property, could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or
results of operations.
Our business is not otherwise substantially affected by direct
governmental regulation, although both municipal and state
authorities sometimes directly regulate parking facilities. We
are affected by laws and regulations (such as zoning ordinances)
that are common to any business that deals with real estate and
by regulations (such as labor and tax laws) that affect
companies with a large number of employees. In addition, several
state and local laws have been passed in recent years that
encourage car pooling and the use of mass transit. Laws and
regulations that reduce the number of cars and vehicles being
driven could adversely impact our business.
In connection with certain transportation services provided to
our clients, including shuttle bus operations, we provide the
vehicles and the drivers to operate these transportation
services. The U.S. Department of Transportation and various
state agencies exercise broad powers over these transportation
services, including, licensing and authorizations, safety and
insurance requirements. Our employee drivers must also comply
with the safety and fitness regulations promulgated by the
Department Transportation, including those related to drug and
alcohol testing and service hours. We may become subject to new
and more restrictive federal and state regulations. Compliance
with such regulations could hamper our ability to provide
qualified drivers and increase our operating costs.
15
We are also subject to consumer credit laws and credit card
industry rules and regulations relating to the processing of
credit card transactions, including the Fair and Accurate Credit
Transactions Act and the Payment Card Data Security Standard.
This law and these industry standards impose substantial
financial penalties for non-compliance.
In addition, we are subject to laws generally applicable to
businesses, including but not limited to federal, state and
local regulations relating to wage and hour matters, employee
classification, mandatory healthcare benefits, unlawful
workplace discrimination and whistle blowing. Any actual or
alleged failure to comply with any regulation applicable to our
business or any whistle-blowing claim, even if without merit,
could result in costly litigation, regulatory action or
otherwise harm our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
We collect and remit sales/parking taxes and file tax returns
for and on behalf of ourselves and our clients. We are affected
by laws and regulations that may impose a direct assessment on
us for failure to remit sales/parking taxes or to file tax
returns for ourselves and on behalf of our clients.
Various other governmental regulations affect our operation of
parking facilities, both directly and indirectly, including the
ADA. Under the ADA, all public accommodations, including parking
facilities, are required to meet certain federal requirements
related to access and use by disabled persons. For example, the
ADA requires parking facilities to include handicapped spaces,
headroom for wheelchair vans, attendants booths that
accommodate wheelchairs and elevators that are operable by
disabled persons. When negotiating management contracts and
leases with clients, we generally require that the property
owner contractually assume responsibility for any ADA liability
in connection with the property. There can be no assurance,
however, that the property owner has assumed such liability for
any given property and there can be no assurance that we would
not be held liable despite assumption of responsibility for such
liability by the property owner. Management believes that the
parking facilities we operate are in substantial compliance with
ADA requirements.
Regulations by the Federal Aviation Administration may affect
our business. The FAA generally prohibits parking within
300 feet of airport terminals during times of heightened
alert. The 300 foot rule and new regulations may prevent us from
using a number of existing spaces during heightened security
alerts at airports. Reductions in the number of parking spaces
may reduce our gross profit and cash flow for both our leased
facilities and those facilities we operate under management
contracts.
Corporate
Information
Our headquarters are located at 900 N. Michigan
Avenue, Suite 1600, Chicago, Illinois
60611-1542.
Our telephone number is
(312) 274-2000.
Our Standard Parking brands web site address is
www.standardparking.com and our SP
Plus®
brands website address is www.spplus.com. Our periodic
reports and other information filed with or furnished to the SEC
are available free of charge through our web site promptly after
those reports and other information are electronically filed
with or furnished to the SEC. Information contained on our web
site or any other web site is not incorporated by reference into
this or any other report we file with or furnish to the SEC, and
you should not consider information contained on our web site or
any other web site to be a part of this or any other report we
file with or furnish to the SEC.
Intellectual
Property
Standard
Parking®
and the Standard Parking logo, SP
Plus®
and the SP Plus logo and Click and
Park®
and the Click and
Park®
logo, are service marks registered with the United States Patent
and Trademark Office. In addition, we have registered the names
and, as applicable, the logos of all of our material
subsidiaries and divisions as service marks with the United
States Patent and Trademark Office or the equivalent state
registry, including the right to the exclusive use of the name
Central Park in the Chicago metropolitan area. We invented the
Multi-Level Vehicle Parking Facility musical Theme Floor
Reminder System, and obtained trademark registrations for our
proprietary parker programs, such as
Books-to-Go®,
Films-To-Go®,
Little
Parkers®
and Ambiance in
Parking®
and our comprehensive training program, Standard
Universitysm. We have also registered the copyright rights
in our proprietary software, such as Client
Viewtm,
Hand Held
Programtm,
License Plate Inventory
Programstm and
ParkStattm
with the United States Copyright Office.
16
You should carefully consider the specific risk factors
described below together with all other information contained in
or incorporated by reference into this report, as these risks,
among others, are important factors that could cause our actual
results to differ from our historical results. It is not
possible to predict or identify all such factors. Consequently,
you should not consider any such list to be a complete statement
of all potential risks or uncertainties applicable to our
business.
We are
subject to intense competition that can constrain our ability to
gain business, as well as our profitability.
We believe that competition in parking facility management and
our ancillary services is intense. The low cost of entry into
the parking facility management business has led to a strongly
competitive, fragmented market consisting primarily of a variety
of entities ranging from single lot operators to large regional
and national multi-facility operators, as well as municipal and
other governmental entities that choose not to outsource their
parking operations. Competitors may be able to adapt more
quickly to changes in customer requirements, or devote greater
resources to the promotion and sale of their services. We
provide nearly all of our services under contracts, many of
which are obtained through competitive bidding, and many of our
competitors also have long-standing relationships with our
clients. Providers of parking facility management services have
traditionally competed on the basis of cost and quality of
service. As we have worked to establish ourselves as one of the
principal members of the industry, we compete predominately on
the basis of high levels of service and strong relationships. We
may not be able to, or may choose not to, compete with certain
competitors on the basis of price. As a result, a greater
proportion of our clients may switch to other service providers
or self-manage. Furthermore, these strong competitive pressures
could impede our success in bidding for profitable business and
our ability to increase prices even as costs rise, thereby
reducing margins.
Our
management contracts and leases expose us to certain
risks.
The loss or renewal on less favorable terms of a substantial
number of management contracts or leases could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations. A material reduction in the operating income
associated with the integrated services we provide under
management contracts and leases could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations. Our management contracts are typically for a term of
one to three years, although the contracts may often be
terminated, without cause, on 30 days notice or less,
giving clients regular opportunities to attempt to negotiate a
reduction in our fees or other allocated costs. Any loss of a
significant number of clients could in the aggregate materially
adversely affect our operating results. In addition, we are
particularly exposed to increases in costs for locations that we
operate under leases because we are generally responsible for
all the operating expenses of our leased locations. An increase
in cost of parking services could reduce our gross profit
derived from locations that we operate under leases.
Adverse
litigation judgments or settlements resulting from legal
proceedings in which we may be involved in the normal course of
our business could affect our operations and financial
condition.
In the normal course of business, we are from time to time
involved in various legal proceedings. We do not believe that
any pending claim, proceeding or litigation, either alone or in
the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our
financial position; however, the outcome of these legal
proceedings cannot be predicted. It is possible that an
unfavorable outcome of some or all of the matters could cause us
to incur substantial liabilities that may have a material
adverse effect upon our financial condition and results of
operations. Any significant adverse litigation judgments or
settlements could have a negative effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
The
operation of our business is dependent upon key
personnel.
Our success is, and will continue to be, substantially dependent
upon the continued services of our executive management team.
The loss of the services of one or more of the members of our
executive
17
management team could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and results of operations. Although we have
entered into employment agreements with, and historically have
been successful in retaining the services of, our executive
management, there can be no assurance that we will be able to
retain them in the future. In addition, our continued growth
depends upon our ability to attract and retain skilled operating
managers and employees.
Deterioration
in economic conditions in general could reduce the demand for
our parking and ancillary services and, as a result, reduce our
earnings and adversely affect our financial
condition.
Adverse changes in global, national and local economic
conditions could have a negative impact on our business. High
domestic unemployment has contributed to reduced discretionary
spending by consumers and slowed or reduced economic activity by
businesses in the United States and most major global economies
compared to 2007 levels. In addition, our business operations
tend to be concentrated in large urban areas. Many of our
customers are workers who commute by car to their places of
employment in these urban centers. Our business could be
materially adversely affected to the extent that weak economic
conditions or demographic factors have resulted in the
elimination of jobs and high unemployment in these large urban
areas. In addition, increased unemployment levels, the movement
of white-collar jobs from urban centers to suburbs or out of
North America entirely, increased office vacancies in urban
areas, movement toward home office alternatives, or lower
consumer spending could reduce consumer demand for our services.
Adverse changes in economic conditions could also lead to a
decline in parking at airports and commercial facilities,
including facilities owned by retail operators and hotels. In
particular, reductions in parking at leased facilities can lower
our profit because a decrease in revenue would be exacerbated by
fixed costs that we must pay under our leases. As of
December 31, 2010, we operated 10% of our locations under
leases, and for the year ended December 31, 2010, we
derived 12% of our gross profit from leases.
If adverse economic conditions reduce discretionary spending,
business travel or other economic activity that fuels demand for
our services, our earnings could be reduced. Adverse changes in
local and national economic conditions could also depress prices
for our services or cause our clients to cancel their agreements
to purchase our services.
We
must comply with public and private regulations that may impose
significant costs on us.
Under various federal, state and local environmental laws,
ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or
operator of real property may be liable for the costs of removal
or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in
such property. These laws typically impose liability without
regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was
responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic
substances. In connection with the operation of parking
facilities, we may be potentially liable for such costs. In
addition, from time to time we are involved in environmental
issues at certain of locations or in connection with our
operations. While it is difficult to predict the ultimate
outcome of any of these matters, based on information currently
available, our management believes that none of these matters,
individually or in the aggregate, is reasonably likely to have a
material adverse effect on our financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows. The cost of defending against claims
of liability, or remediation of a contaminated property, could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations. In addition, several state
and local laws have been passed in recent years that encourage
car pooling and the use of mass transit. Laws and regulations
that reduce the number of cars and vehicles being driven could
adversely impact our business.
In connection with certain transportation services provided to
our clients, including shuttle bus operations, we provide the
vehicles and the drivers to operate these transportation
services. The U.S. Department of Transportation and various
state agencies exercise broad powers over these transportation
services, including, licensing and authorizations, safety and
insurance requirements. Our employee drivers must also comply
with the safety and fitness regulations promulgated by the
Department Transportation, including those related to drug and
alcohol testing and service hours. We may become subject to new
and more restrictive federal and
18
state regulations. Compliance with such regulations could hamper
our ability to provide qualified drivers and increase our
operating costs.
We are also subject to consumer credit laws and credit card
industry rules and regulations relating to the processing of
credit card transactions, including the Fair and Accurate Credit
Transactions Act and the Payment Card Data Security Standard.
This law and these industry standards impose substantial
financial penalties for non-compliance.
In addition, we are subject to laws generally applicable to
businesses, including but not limited to federal, state and
local regulations relating to wage and hour matters, employee
classification, mandatory healthcare benefits, unlawful
workplace discrimination and whistle blowing. Any actual or
alleged failure to comply with any regulation applicable to our
business or any whistle-blowing claim, even if without merit,
could result in costly litigation, regulatory action or
otherwise harm our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
We collect and remit sales/parking taxes and file tax returns
for and on behalf of ourselves and our clients. We are affected
by laws and regulations that may impose a direct assessment on
us for failure to remit sales/parking taxes and filing of tax
returns for ourselves and on behalf of our clients.
The
financial difficulties or bankruptcy of one or more of our major
clients could adversely affect our results.
Future revenue and our ability to collect accounts receivable
depend, in part, on the financial strength of our clients. We
estimate an allowance for accounts we do not consider
collectible, and this allowance adversely impacts profitability.
In the event that our clients experience financial difficulty,
become unable to obtain financing or seek bankruptcy protection,
our profitability would be further impacted by our failure to
collect accounts receivable in excess of the estimated
allowance. Additionally, our future revenue would be reduced by
the loss of these clients or by the cancellation of leases or
management contracts by clients in bankruptcy.
Additional
funds would need to be reserved for future insurance losses if
such losses are worse than expected.
We provide liability and workers compensation insurance
coverage consistent with our obligations to our clients under
our various management contracts and leases. We are obligated to
reimburse our insurance carrier for each loss incurred in the
current policy year up to the amount of a deductible specified
in our insurance policies. The per-occurrence deductible for our
various liability and workers compensation policies is
$250,000. We also purchase property insurance that provides
coverage for loss or damage to our property, and in some cases
our clients property, as well as business interruption
coverage for lost operating income and certain associated
expenses. The deductible applicable to any given loss under our
property insurance policy varies based upon the insured values
and the peril that causes the loss. Our financial statements
reflect our funding of all such obligations based upon guidance
and evaluation we have received from third-party insurance
professionals. There can be no assurance, however, that the
ultimate amount of our obligations will not exceed the amount
presently funded or accrued, in which case we would need to set
aside additional funds to reserve for any such excess. Changes
in insurance reserves as a result of periodic evaluations of the
liabilities can cause swings in our operating results that may
not be indicative of the operations of our ongoing business.
Additionally, our obligations could increase if we receive a
greater number of insurance claims, or if the severity of, or
the administrative costs associated with, those claims generally
increases. A material increase in insurance costs due to a
change in the number or severity of claims, claim costs or
premiums paid by us could have a material adverse effect on our
operating income.
Labor
disputes could lead to loss of revenues or expense
variations.
At December 31, 2010, approximately 29% of our employees
were represented by labor unions. Approximately 33% of our
collective bargaining contracts, representing approximately 16%
of our employees, are up for renewal in 2011. In addition, at
any given time, we may face a number of union organizing drives.
19
When one or more of our major collective bargaining agreements
becomes subject to renegotiation or when we face union
organizing drives, the union and we may disagree on important
issues that, in turn, could lead to a strike, work slowdown or
other job actions. There can be no assurance that we will be
able to renew existing labor union contracts on acceptable
terms. In such cases, there are no assurances that we would be
able to staff sufficient employees for our short-term needs. A
strike, work slowdown or other job action could in some cases
disrupt us from providing services, resulting in reduced
revenues. If declines in client service occur or if our clients
are targeted for sympathy strikes by other unionized workers,
contract cancellations could result. The result of negotiating a
first time agreement or renegotiating an existing collective
bargaining agreement could result in a substantial increase in
labor and benefits expenses that we may be unable to pass
through to clients. In addition, potential legislation could
make it significantly easier for union organizing drives to be
successful and could give third-party arbitrators the ability to
impose terms of collective bargaining agreements upon us and a
labor union if we and such union are unable to agree to the
terms of a collective bargaining agreement.
In addition, we make contributions to multiemployer benefit
plans on behalf of certain employees covered by collective
bargaining agreements and could be responsible for paying
unfunded liabilities incurred by such benefit plans, which
amount could be material.
Natural
disasters or acts of terrorism, including cyber terrorism, could
disrupt services.
Storms, earthquakes, drought, floods or other natural disasters
or acts of terrorism may result in reduced revenues. Disasters
may also cause economic dislocations throughout the country.
Acts of cyber terrorism involve the premeditated use of
disruptive activities, or the threat thereof, involving
computers
and/or
networks, with the intention to cause harm or further social,
ideological, religious, political or similar objectives. The
occurrence of acts of cyber terrorism such as website
defacement, denial of automated payment services, sabotage of
our proprietary on-demand technology or the use of electronic
social media to disseminate unfounded or otherwise harmful
allegations to our reputation, could have a material adverse
effect on our business. In addition, terrorist attacks have
resulted in, and may continue to result in, increased government
regulation of airlines and airport facilities, including
imposition of minimum distances between parking facilities and
terminals, resulting in the elimination of currently managed
parking facilities. We derive a significant percentage of our
gross profit from parking facilities and parking related
services in and around airports. The Federal Aviation
Administration generally prohibits parking within 300 feet
of airport terminals during periods of heightened security.
While the prohibition is not currently in effect, there can be
no assurance that this governmental prohibition will not again
be reinstated. The existing regulations governing parking within
300 feet of airport terminals or future regulations may
prevent us from using certain parking spaces. Reductions in the
number of parking spaces and air travelers may reduce our
revenue and cash flow for both our leased facilities and those
facilities we operate under management contracts.
State
and municipal government clients may sell or enter into
long-term leases of parking-related assets to our
competitors.
In order to raise additional revenue, a number of state and
municipal governments have either sold or entered into long-term
leases of public assets or may be contemplating such
transactions. The assets that are the subject of such
transactions have included government-owned parking garages
located in downtown commercial districts and parking operations
at airports. The sale or long-term leasing of such
government-owned parking assets to our competitors or clients of
our competitors could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Uncertainty
in the credit markets may negatively impact our ability to
collect receivables on a timely basis and our cash
flow.
The United States and global economies and the financial and
credit markets continue to experience slow growth, and there
continues to be diminished liquidity and credit availability in
certain sectors. In addition, the tightening of credit in
financial markets may adversely affect the ability of our
clients to obtain financing, which could adversely impact our
ability to collect amounts due from such clients or result in a
decrease, or
20
cancellation, of our services under our client contracts.
Declines in our ability to collect receivables or in the level
of client spending could adversely affect the results of our
operations and our liquidity.
Our
ability to expand our business will be dependent upon the
availability of adequate capital.
The rate of our expansion will depend in part upon the
availability of adequate capital, which in turn will depend in
large part upon cash flow generated by our business and the
availability of equity and debt capital. In addition, our senior
credit facility contains provisions that restrict our ability to
incur additional indebtedness
and/or make
substantial investments or acquisitions. As a result, we cannot
assure you that we will be able to finance our current growth
strategy.
The
sureties for our performance bond program may elect not to
provide us with new or renewal performance bonds for any
reason.
As is customary in the industry, a surety provider can refuse to
provide a bond principal with new or renewal surety bonds. If
any existing or future surety provider refuses to provide us
with surety bonds, either generally or because we are unwilling
or unable to post collateral at levels sufficient to satisfy the
suretys requirements, there can be no assurance that we
would be able to find alternate providers on acceptable terms,
or at all. Our inability to provide surety bonds could also
result in the loss of existing contracts. Failure to find a
provider of surety bonds, and our resulting inability to bid for
new contracts or renew existing contracts, could have a material
adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Federal
health care reform legislation may adversely affect our business
and results of operations.
In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010
were signed into law in the United States (collectively, the
Health Care Reform Laws). The Health Care Reform
Laws include a large number of health-related provisions that
become effective over the next four years, including requiring
most individuals to have health insurance and establishing new
regulations on health plans. Although the Health Care Reform
Laws do not mandate that employers offer health insurance,
beginning in 2014 penalties will be assessed on large employers
who do not offer health insurance that meets certain
affordability or benefit requirements. Providing such additional
health insurance benefits to our employees, or the payment of
penalties if such coverage is not provided, would increase our
expense. If we are unable to raise the rates we charge our
clients to cover this expense, such increases in expense could
reduce our operating profit.
In addition, under the Health Care Reform Laws employers will
have to file a significant amount of additional information with
the Internal Revenue Service and will have to develop systems
and processes to track requisite information. We will have to
modify our current systems, which could increase our general and
administrative expense.
We do
not maintain insurance coverage for all possible
risks.
We maintain a comprehensive portfolio of insurance policies to
help protect us against loss or damage incurred from a wide
variety of insurable risks. Each year, we review with our
professional insurance advisers whether the insurance policies
and associated coverages that we maintain are sufficient to
adequately protect us from the various types of risk to which we
are exposed in the ordinary course of business. That analysis
takes into account various pertinent factors such as the
likelihood that we would incur a material loss from any given
risk as well as the cost of obtaining insurance coverage against
any such risk. While we believe that we maintain a comprehensive
portfolio of insurance that is consistent with customary
business practices and adequately protects us from the risks
that we typically face in the ordinary course of our business,
there can be no assurance that we may not sustain a material
loss for which we do not maintain any, or adequate insurance
coverage.
21
Parking
Facilities
We operate parking facilities in 42 states and the District
of Columbia in the United States and five provinces of Canada.
We do not currently own any parking facilities. The following
table summarizes certain information regarding our facilities as
of December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of Locations
|
|
# of Spaces
|
States/Provinces
|
|
Airports and Urban Cities
|
|
Airport
|
|
Urban
|
|
Total
|
|
Airport
|
|
Urban
|
|
Total
|
|
Alabama
|
|
Airports and Auburn
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1,562
|
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
2,482
|
|
Alberta
|
|
Airports, Calgary and Edmonton
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,333
|
|
|
|
15,333
|
|
Arizona
|
|
Phoenix and Tempe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,252
|
|
|
|
14,252
|
|
British Columbia
|
|
Vancouver
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
701
|
|
California
|
|
Airports, Beverly Hills, Encino, Glendale, Long Beach,
Los Angeles, Sacramento, San Francisco, San Jose,
Santa Monica and Woodland Hills
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
3,793
|
|
|
|
190,813
|
|
|
|
194,606
|
|
Colorado
|
|
Airports, Aurora, Colorado Springs, and Denver
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
40,857
|
|
|
|
30,567
|
|
|
|
71,424
|
|
Connecticut
|
|
Airports and Greenwich
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
7,941
|
|
|
|
941
|
|
|
|
8,882
|
|
Delaware
|
|
Wilmington
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
District of Columbia
|
|
Washington, DC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,387
|
|
|
|
5,387
|
|
Florida
|
|
Airports, Coral Gables, Ft. Myers, Miami, Orlando and Tampa
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
15,539
|
|
|
|
26,279
|
|
|
|
41,818
|
|
Georgia
|
|
Airports and Atlanta
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
31,491
|
|
|
|
20,630
|
|
|
|
52,121
|
|
Hawaii
|
|
Airports, Honolulu, and Lahaina
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
2,455
|
|
|
|
13,351
|
|
|
|
15,806
|
|
Idaho
|
|
Airport
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
915
|
|
Illinois
|
|
Airports, Chicago and Hoffman Estates
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
37,366
|
|
|
|
104,523
|
|
|
|
141,889
|
|
Indiana
|
|
Airport and Indianapolis
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,305
|
|
Kansas
|
|
Bonner Springs, Kansas City and Topeka
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,317
|
|
|
|
1,317
|
|
Kentucky
|
|
Airports and Lexington
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
16,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,748
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
Airport and New Orleans
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
2,608
|
|
|
|
7,523
|
|
|
|
10,131
|
|
Maine
|
|
Airports and Portland
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2,288
|
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
4,178
|
|
Manitoba
|
|
Winnipeg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
Maryland
|
|
Baltimore, Landover and Towson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,356
|
|
|
|
38,356
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
Boston, Cambridge, Chestnut Hill and Hopkinton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,317
|
|
|
|
29,317
|
|
Michigan
|
|
Airports and Detroit
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
12,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,665
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
Airport, Minneapolis and St. Paul
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
8,005
|
|
|
|
8,625
|
|
Missouri
|
|
Airports and Kansas City
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
26,019
|
|
|
|
33,398
|
|
|
|
59,417
|
|
Montana
|
|
Airports
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
4,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,137
|
|
Nebraska
|
|
Airports
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
Nevada
|
|
Las Vegas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
New Hampshire
|
|
Manchester
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of Locations
|
|
# of Spaces
|
States/Provinces
|
|
Airports and Urban Cities
|
|
Airport
|
|
Urban
|
|
Total
|
|
Airport
|
|
Urban
|
|
Total
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
Clifton, Jersey City, Newark, Paterson and Wayne
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,038
|
|
|
|
20,038
|
|
New Mexico
|
|
Airport
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York
|
|
Airports, Bronx, Buffalo and New York City
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
11,740
|
|
|
|
42,867
|
|
|
|
54,607
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
Airport and Charlotte
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
10,182
|
|
|
|
11,585
|
|
North Dakota
|
|
Airports
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,181
|
|
Ohio
|
|
Airports, Akron, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus and Lakewood
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
10,695
|
|
|
|
77,195
|
|
|
|
87,890
|
|
Ontario
|
|
Airport, Hamilton, North York and Toronto
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
2,075
|
|
|
|
35,990
|
|
|
|
38,065
|
|
Oregon
|
|
Airports
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
15,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,903
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
Airports, Philadelphia and Westchester
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
1,114
|
|
|
|
15,282
|
|
|
|
16,396
|
|
Quebec
|
|
Gatineau
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
Rhode Island
|
|
Airports
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
9,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,027
|
|
South Dakota
|
|
Airports
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,716
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
Airport, Memphis and Nashville
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
2,411
|
|
Texas
|
|
Airports, Austin, Dallas, Fort Worth and Houston
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
7,352
|
|
|
|
85,492
|
|
|
|
92,844
|
|
Utah
|
|
Salt Lake City
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,099
|
|
|
|
3,099
|
|
Virginia
|
|
Airports, Alexandria, Arlington, Fairfax and Richmond
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
9,702
|
|
|
|
32,622
|
|
|
|
42,324
|
|
Washington
|
|
Airports, Bellevue and Seattle
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
15,910
|
|
|
|
16,732
|
|
Wisconsin
|
|
Airports and Milwaukee
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
4,384
|
|
|
|
1,967
|
|
|
|
6,351
|
|
Wyoming
|
|
Casper and Mills
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,840
|
|
|
|
1,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
1,967
|
|
|
|
2,119
|
|
|
|
291,070
|
|
|
|
889,300
|
|
|
|
1,180,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have interests in twelve joint ventures and one limited
liability company. The twelve joint ventures each operate
between one and thirty-three parking facilities. The limited
liability company collects and distributes parking facility data
for a fee. We are the general partner of one limited
partnership, which operates eight parking facilities. For
additional information, please see Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Summary of Operating Facilities.
Office
Leases
We lease approximately 24,000 square feet of office space
for our corporate offices in Chicago, Illinois. The lease
expires in 2013. We have a right of first opportunity on an
additional 24,000 square feet. We believe that the leased
facility, together with our expansion options, is adequate to
meet current and foreseeable future needs.
We also lease regional offices. These lease agreements generally
include renewal and expansion options, and we believe that these
facilities are adequate to meet our current and foreseeable
future needs.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
We are subject to litigation in the normal course of our
business. The outcomes of legal proceedings and claims brought
against us and other loss contingencies are subject to
significant uncertainty. We accrue a charge against income when
our management determines that it is probable that an asset has
been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount of
loss can be reasonably estimated. In addition, we accrue for
23
the authoritative judgments or assertions made against us by
government agencies at the time of their rendering regardless of
our intent to appeal. In determining the appropriate accounting
for loss contingencies, we consider the likelihood of loss or
impairment of an asset or the incurrence of a liability, as well
as our ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss. We
regularly evaluate current information available to us to
determine whether an accrual should be established or adjusted.
Estimating the probability that a loss will occur and estimating
the amount of a loss or a range of loss involves significant
judgment.
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Market
Information
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the symbol STAN. The following table sets
forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices
for our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select
Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Sales Price
|
|
Sales Price
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
March 31
|
|
$
|
17.14
|
|
|
$
|
16.04
|
|
|
$
|
20.31
|
|
|
$
|
14.83
|
|
June 30
|
|
$
|
17.45
|
|
|
$
|
15.01
|
|
|
$
|
16.85
|
|
|
$
|
13.90
|
|
September 30
|
|
$
|
17.40
|
|
|
$
|
14.61
|
|
|
$
|
17.96
|
|
|
$
|
15.59
|
|
December 31
|
|
$
|
20.04
|
|
|
$
|
15.75
|
|
|
$
|
18.00
|
|
|
$
|
15.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holders
As of March 8, 2011, there were approximately
3,785 holders of our common stock, based on the number of
record holders of our common stock and an estimate of the number
of individual participants represented by security position
listings.
Dividends
We did not pay a cash dividend in respect of our common stock in
2010 or 2009. By the terms of our senior credit facility, we are
restricted from paying cash dividends on our capital stock while
such facility is in effect.
There are no restrictions on the ability of our wholly owned
subsidiaries to pay cash dividends to us.
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation
Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available
|
|
|
|
to be Based
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
for Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
Upon Exercise of
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Reflected in Column (a))
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by securities holders
|
|
|
911,446
|
|
|
$
|
0.86
|
|
|
|
117,902
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by securities holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
911,446
|
|
|
$
|
0.86
|
|
|
|
117,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
The following table presents selected historical consolidated
financial data as of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
derived from our audited consolidated financial statements,
which are included elsewhere herein. The table also presents
selected historical consolidated financial data as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006 derived from our audited
consolidated financial statements, which are not included
herein. The selected financial data set forth below should be
read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Result of Operations
and the historical consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto for years 2010, 2009 and 2008 which are included
elsewhere herein. The historical results do not necessarily
indicate results expected for any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parking services revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
$
|
138,664
|
|
|
$
|
140,441
|
|
|
$
|
154,311
|
|
|
$
|
145,327
|
|
|
$
|
153,336
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
171,331
|
|
|
|
153,382
|
|
|
|
145,828
|
|
|
|
119,612
|
|
|
|
106,554
|
|
Reimbursed management contract revenue
|
|
|
411,148
|
|
|
|
401,671
|
|
|
|
400,621
|
|
|
|
356,782
|
|
|
|
346,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
721,143
|
|
|
|
695,494
|
|
|
|
700,760
|
|
|
|
621,721
|
|
|
|
605,945
|
|
Cost of parking services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
128,613
|
|
|
|
130,897
|
|
|
|
140,058
|
|
|
|
129,550
|
|
|
|
139,043
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
94,481
|
|
|
|
84,167
|
|
|
|
69,285
|
|
|
|
49,726
|
|
|
|
44,990
|
|
Reimbursed management contract expense
|
|
|
411,148
|
|
|
|
401,671
|
|
|
|
400,621
|
|
|
|
356,782
|
|
|
|
346,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of parking services
|
|
|
634,242
|
|
|
|
616,735
|
|
|
|
609,964
|
|
|
|
536,058
|
|
|
|
530,088
|
|
Gross profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
10,051
|
|
|
|
9,544
|
|
|
|
14,253
|
|
|
|
15,777
|
|
|
|
14,293
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
76,850
|
|
|
|
69,215
|
|
|
|
76,543
|
|
|
|
69,886
|
|
|
|
61,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
|
86,901
|
|
|
|
78,759
|
|
|
|
90,796
|
|
|
|
85,663
|
|
|
|
75,857
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
47,878
|
|
|
|
44,707
|
|
|
|
47,619
|
|
|
|
44,796
|
|
|
|
41,228
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6,074
|
|
|
|
5,828
|
|
|
|
6,059
|
|
|
|
5,335
|
|
|
|
5,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
32,949
|
|
|
|
28,224
|
|
|
|
37,118
|
|
|
|
35,532
|
|
|
|
28,991
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
5,335
|
|
|
|
6,012
|
|
|
|
6,476
|
|
|
|
7,056
|
|
|
|
8,296
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
(610
|
)
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,086
|
|
|
|
5,744
|
|
|
|
6,303
|
|
|
|
6,446
|
|
|
|
7,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
27,863
|
|
|
|
22,480
|
|
|
|
30,815
|
|
|
|
29,086
|
|
|
|
21,247
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)(1)
|
|
|
10,755
|
|
|
|
8,265
|
|
|
|
11,622
|
|
|
|
11,267
|
|
|
|
(14,880
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
17,108
|
|
|
|
14,215
|
|
|
|
19,193
|
|
|
|
17,819
|
|
|
|
36,127
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest(2)
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Standard Parking Corporation
|
|
$
|
16,840
|
|
|
$
|
14,092
|
|
|
$
|
19,045
|
|
|
$
|
17,373
|
|
|
$
|
35,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at end of year):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
7,305
|
|
|
$
|
8,256
|
|
|
$
|
8,301
|
|
|
$
|
8,466
|
|
|
$
|
8,058
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
255,632
|
|
|
|
242,754
|
|
|
|
229,241
|
|
|
|
215,388
|
|
|
|
212,528
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
97,902
|
|
|
|
113,211
|
|
|
|
125,064
|
|
|
|
80,363
|
|
|
|
85,665
|
|
Common stockholders equity
|
|
|
36,878
|
|
|
|
14,749
|
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
|
|
39,339
|
|
|
|
41,253
|
|
25
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) for 2006 includes a reduction in
the valuation allowance for net operating loss carryforwards and
other deferred tax assets of $23,924. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects the retrospective adoption, effective January 1,
2009, of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting
Standards Codification Topic 810, Consolidation (formerly
FAS 160) (ASC 810). Upon adoption of ASC 810,
we reclassified minority interests in our consolidated balance
sheet from accrued expenses to noncontrolling interests in the
equity section. Additionally, we changed the way noncontrolling
interests are presented within the consolidated statement of
income such that the statement of income reflects results
attributable to both our interests and noncontrolling interests.
While the accounting provisions of ASC 810 are being applied
prospectively beginning January 1, 2009, the presentation
and disclosure requirements have been applied retrospectively.
The results attributable to our interests did not change upon
the adoption of ASC 810. |
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
The following discussion of our results of operations should
be read in conjunction with the Selected Financial
Data and our consolidated financial statements and the
related notes included elsewhere herein. This discussion
contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from
those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a
result of many factors, including, but not limited to, those set
forth in Item 1A Risk Factors and elsewhere
herein.
Overview
Our
Business
We manage parking facilities in urban markets and at airports
across the United States and in five Canadian provinces. We do
not own any facilities, but instead enter into contractual
relationships with property owners or managers.
We operate our clients properties through two types of
arrangements: management contracts and leases. Under a
management contract, we typically receive a base monthly fee for
managing the facility, and we may also receive an incentive fee
based on the achievement of facility performance objectives. We
also receive fees for ancillary services. Typically, all of the
underlying revenues and expenses under a standard management
contract flow through to our clients rather than to us. However,
some management contracts, which are referred to as
reverse management contracts, usually provide for
larger management fees and require us to pay various costs.
Under lease arrangements, we generally pay to the property owner
either a fixed annual rent, a percentage of gross customer
collections or a combination thereof. We collect all revenues
under lease arrangements and we are responsible for most
operating expenses, but we are typically not responsible for
major maintenance, capital expenditures or real estate taxes.
Margins for lease contracts vary significantly, not only due to
operating performance, but also due to variability of parking
rates in different cities and varying space utilization by
parking facility type and location. As of December 31,
2010, we operated 90% of our locations under management
contracts and 10% under leases.
In evaluating our financial condition and operating performance,
managements primary focus is on our gross profit, total
general and administrative expense and general and
administrative expense as a percentage of our gross profit.
Although the underlying economics to us of management contracts
and leases are similar, the manner in which we are required to
account for them differs. Revenue from leases includes all gross
customer collections derived from our leased locations (net of
parking tax), whereas revenue from management contracts only
includes our contractually agreed upon management fees and
amounts attributable to ancillary services. Gross customer
collections at facilities under management contracts, therefore,
are not included in our revenue. Accordingly, while a change in
the proportion of our operating agreements that are structured
as leases versus management contracts may cause significant
fluctuations in reported revenue and expense of parking
services, that change will not artificially affect our gross
profit. For example, as of December 31, 2010, 90% of our
locations were operated under management contracts and 88% of
our gross profit for the
26
year ended December 31, 2010 was derived from management
contracts. Only 55% of total revenue (excluding reimbursed
management contract revenue), however, was from management
contracts because under those contracts the revenue collected
from parking customers belongs to our clients. Therefore, gross
profit and total general and administrative expense, rather than
revenue, are managements primary focus.
General
Business Trends
We believe that sophisticated commercial real estate developers
and property managers and owners recognize the potential for
parking and related services to be a profit generator rather
than a cost center. Often, the parking experience makes both the
first and the last impressions on their properties tenants
and visitors. By outsourcing these services, they are able to
capture additional profit by leveraging the unique operational
skills and controls that an experienced parking management
company can offer. Our ability to consistently deliver a
uniformly high level of parking and related services and
maximize the profit to our clients improves our ability to win
contracts and retain existing locations. Our location retention
rate for the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009 was 91% and 87%, respectively, which
also reflects our decision not to renew, or terminate,
unprofitable contracts.
For the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year
ended December 31, 2009, average gross profit per location
increased 12% from $37.0 thousand to $41.0 thousand, primarily
due to an increase in our event planning and transportation
revenue and legal fees related to the California labor code case
in 2009 that did not recur in 2010.
Summary
of Operating Facilities
We focus our operations in core markets where a concentration of
locations improves customer service levels and operating
margins. The following table reflects our facilities operated at
the end of the years indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Managed facilities
|
|
|
1,907
|
|
|
|
1,921
|
|
|
|
1,986
|
|
Leased facilities
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total facilities
|
|
|
2,119
|
|
|
|
2,129
|
|
|
|
2,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
We recognize parking services revenue from lease and management
contracts as the related services are provided. Substantially
all of our revenues come from the following two sources:
|
|
|
|
|
Parking services revenue lease
contracts. Parking services revenues related to
lease contracts consist of all revenue received at a leased
facility, including parking receipts (net of parking tax),
consulting and real estate development fees, gains on sales of
contracts and payments for exercising termination rights.
|
|
|
|
Parking services revenue management
contracts. Management contract revenue consists
of management fees, including both fixed and performance-based
fees, and amounts attributable to ancillary services such as
accounting, equipment leasing, payments received for exercising
termination rights, consulting, development fees, gains on sales
of contracts, insurance and other value-added services with
respect to managed locations. We believe we generally purchase
required insurance at lower rates than our clients can obtain on
their own because we effectively self-insure for all liability
and workers compensation claims by maintaining a large
per-claim deductible. As a result, we have generated operating
income on the insurance provided under our management contracts
by focusing on our risk management efforts and controlling
losses. Management contract revenues do not include gross
customer collections at the managed locations as this revenue
belongs to the property owner rather than to us. Management
contracts generally provide us with a management fee regardless
of the operating performance of the underlying facility.
|
27
Conversions between type of contracts, lease or management, are
typically determined by our clients and not us. Although the
underlying economics to us of management contracts and leases
are similar, the manner in which we account for them differs
substantially.
Reimbursed
Management Contract Revenue
Reimbursed of management contract revenue consists of the direct
reimbursement from the property owner for operating expenses
incurred under a management contract, which is reflected in our
revenue.
Cost
of Parking Services
Our cost of parking services consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of parking services lease
contracts. The cost of parking services under a
lease arrangement consists of contractual rental fees paid to
the facility owner and all operating expenses incurred in
connection with operating the leased facility. Contractual fees
paid to the facility owner are generally based on either a fixed
contractual amount or a percentage of gross revenue or a
combination thereof. Generally, under a lease arrangement we are
not responsible for major capital expenditures or real estate
taxes.
|
|
|
|
Cost of parking services management
contracts. The cost of parking services under a
management contract is generally the responsibility of the
facility owner. As a result, these costs are not included in our
results of operations. However, our reverse management
contracts, which typically provide for larger management fees,
do require us to pay for certain costs.
|
Reimbursed
Management Contract Expense
Reimbursed management contract expense consists of direct
reimbursed costs incurred on behalf of property owners under a
management contract, which is reflected in our cost of parking
services.
Gross
Profit
Gross profit equals our revenue less the cost of generating such
revenue. This is the key metric we use to examine our
performance because it captures the underlying economic benefit
to us of both lease contracts and management contracts.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses include salaries, wages,
payroll taxes, insurance, travel and office related expenses for
our headquarters, field offices, supervisory employees, and
board of directors.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Depreciation is determined using a straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the various asset classes or in the
case of leasehold improvements, over the initial term of the
operating lease or its useful life, whichever is shorter.
Intangible assets determined to have finite lives are amortized
over their remaining useful life.
Results
of Operations
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
Segments
An operating segment is defined as a component of an enterprise
that engages in business activities from which it may earn
revenue and incur expenses, and about which separate financial
information is regularly evaluated by our chief operating
decision maker, in deciding how to allocate resources. Our chief
operating decision maker is our president and chief executive
officer.
28
Our business is managed based on regions administered by
executive vice presidents. The following is a summary of
revenues (excluding reimbursed management contract revenue) by
region for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
Information related to prior years has been recast to conform to
the current regional alignment.
Region One encompasses operations in Delaware, District of
Columbia, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas,
Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, New
Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and Wisconsin.
Region Two encompasses our Canadian operations, event planning
and transportation, and our technology-based parking and traffic
management systems.
Region Three encompasses operations in Arizona, California,
Colorado, Hawaii, Louisiana, Nevada, Texas, Utah, Washington,
and Wyoming.
Region Four encompasses all major airport and transportation
operations nationwide.
Other consists of ancillary revenue that is not specifically
identifiable to a region and insurance reserve adjustments
related to prior years.
The following tables present the material factors that impact
our financial statements on an operating segment basis.
Segment revenue information is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Region One
|
|
|
Region Two
|
|
|
Region Three
|
|
|
Region Four
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Lease contract revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
$
|
4.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.4
|
|
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
452.9
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
(8.0
|
)
|
|
|
(80.8
|
)
|
Same location
|
|
|
69.1
|
|
|
|
70.4
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
35.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
126.1
|
|
|
|
125.5
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Conversions
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
(60.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total lease contract revenue
|
|
$
|
75.4
|
|
|
$
|
79.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.4
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
21.4
|
|
|
$
|
19.3
|
|
|
$
|
39.5
|
|
|
$
|
39.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
138.7
|
|
|
$
|
140.4
|
|
|
$
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management contract revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
$
|
1.1
|
|
|
$
|
16.1
|
|
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
14.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
42.7
|
|
|
$
|
6.7
|
|
|
$
|
36.0
|
|
|
|
537.3
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
|
(13.1
|
)
|
|
|
(68.9
|
)
|
Same location
|
|
|
38.6
|
|
|
|
42.3
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
45.1
|
|
|
|
46.2
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
122.3
|
|
|
|
127.6
|
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
Conversions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
300.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total management contract revenue
|
|
$
|
48.4
|
|
|
$
|
53.3
|
|
|
$
|
25.9
|
|
|
$
|
13.3
|
|
|
$
|
51.9
|
|
|
$
|
54.8
|
|
|
$
|
45.0
|
|
|
$
|
32.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
171.3
|
|
|
$
|
153.4
|
|
|
$
|
17.9
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parking services revenue lease
contracts. Lease contract revenue decreased
$1.7 million, or 1.2%, to $138.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 2010, compared to $140.4 million in
the year-ago period. The decrease resulted primarily from
decreases in revenue from contract expirations and conversions,
partially offset by increases in revenue from new locations.
Same location revenue for those facilities, which as of
December 31, 2010 are the comparative periods for the two
years presented, increased 0.5%. The increase in same location
revenue was due to increases in short-term parking revenue of
$1.5 million, or 1.8%, partially offset by decreases in
monthly parking revenue of $0.9 million, or 2.4%. Revenue
associated with contract expirations relates to contracts that
expired during the current period.
Parking services revenue management
contracts. Management contract revenue increased
$17.9 million, or 11.7%, to $171.3 million for the
year ended December 31, 2010, compared to
$153.4 million in the year-ago period. The increase
resulted primarily from new locations and conversions, which was
partially offset by the decrease in revenue from contract
expirations. Same locations revenue for those facilities, which
29
as of December 31, 2010 are the comparative periods for the
two years presented, decreased 4.2%, primarily due to decreased
fees from reverse management locations and ancillary services.
Reimbursed management contract
revenue. Reimbursed management contract revenue
increased $9.4 million, or 2.4%, to $411.1 million for
the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to
$401.7 million in the year-ago period. This increase
resulted from additional reimbursements for costs incurred on
behalf of owners.
Lease contract revenue decreased primarily due to contract
expirations in all four operating regions combined with
conversions to management agreements in region four. This was
partially offset by increases in new location revenues for
regions one, three and four, while regions two and four recorded
increases in same location revenues. Same location revenue
increases for the aforementioned regions were primarily due to
increases in short-term parking revenue while monthly parking
revenue declined slightly.
Management contract revenue increased primarily due to new
locations revenue in all four operating regions. This was
partially offset with by contract expirations in all four
regions and same location revenue declines in three out of the
four operating regions. The decreases in same location revenue
were primarily due to a decrease in fees from reverse management
locations and ancillary services. For comparability purposes,
revenue associated with contract expirations relate to the
contracts that expired during the current period.
Segment cost of parking services information is summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Region One
|
|
|
Region Two
|
|
|
Region Three
|
|
|
Region Four
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Cost of parking services lease contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.8
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
486.7
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
(7.5
|
)
|
|
|
(79.8
|
)
|
Same location
|
|
|
64.6
|
|
|
|
65.5
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
34.6
|
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
116.6
|
|
|
|
116.8
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Conversions
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
(59.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of parking services lease contracts
|
|
$
|
70.6
|
|
|
$
|
73.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.2
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
19.5
|
|
|
$
|
17.5
|
|
|
$
|
36.5
|
|
|
$
|
36.9
|
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
128.6
|
|
|
$
|
130.9
|
|
|
$
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of parking services management contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
$
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
12.6
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
13.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
31.5
|
|
|
$
|
3.9
|
|
|
$
|
27.6
|
|
|
|
707.7
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
(70.4
|
)
|
Same location
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
19.7
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
|
|
69.5
|
|
|
|
(9.9
|
)
|
|
|
(14.2
|
)
|
Conversions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of parking services management contracts
|
|
$
|
21.1
|
|
|
$
|
25.7
|
|
|
$
|
18.7
|
|
|
$
|
8.4
|
|
|
$
|
27.4
|
|
|
$
|
33.1
|
|
|
$
|
28.2
|
|
|
$
|
17.0
|
|
|
$
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
94.5
|
|
|
$
|
84.2
|
|
|
$
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of parking services lease
contracts. Cost of parking services for lease
contracts decreased $2.3 million, or 1.8%, to
$128.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010,
compared to $130.9 million in the year-ago period. The
decrease resulted primarily from decreases in costs from
contract expirations and fewer locations that converted from
management contracts during the current year, which more than
offset the increases in new locations. Same locations costs for
those facilities, which as of December 31, 2010 are the
comparative for the two years presented, decreased 0.2%. Same
location costs decreased $0.3 million due to payroll and
payroll-related expenses and $0.2 million related to other
operating costs, partially offset by an increase of
$0.3 million due to rent expense, primarily as a result of
contingent rental payments on the increase in revenue for same
locations.
Cost of parking services management
contracts. Cost of parking services for
management contracts increased $10.3 million, or 12.2%, to
$94.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010,
compared to $84.2 million in the year-ago period. The
increase resulted from increases in costs related to new reverse
30
management locations and conversions, which more than offset the
decrease in costs from contract expirations. Same location costs
for those facilities, which as of December 31, 2010 are the
comparative for the two years presented, decreased 14.2%. Same
location decrease in operating expenses for management contracts
primarily resulted from decreases in costs associated with
reverse management contracts and the cost of providing
management services.
Reimbursed management contract
expense. Reimbursed management contract expense
increased $9.4 million, or 2.4%, to $411.1 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to
$401.7 million in the year-ago period. This increase
resulted from additional reimbursed cost incurred on the behalf
of owners.
Cost of parking services for lease contracts decreased primarily
due to contract expirations in all four operating regions
combined with conversions to management contracts which impacted
regions one and four, which more than offset new locations added
in three out of the four operating regions. Same locations costs
decreases slightly as reductions in payroll, payroll related
costs and other operating costs partially offset increases in
contingent rent payments on the increase in revenue.
Cost of parking services for management contracts increased in
all four operating regions due to new locations. Partially
offsetting, were decreases due to contract expirations and
decreases in cost related to same locations primarily related to
reductions in payroll, payroll related costs and other operating
costs. In addition, based upon third party actuarial analysis,
the other region recorded a prior year insurance reserve
adjustment.
Segment gross profit/gross profit percentage information is
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Region One
|
|
|
Region Two
|
|
|
Region Three
|
|
|
Region Four
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Gross profit lease contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)
|
Same location
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
Conversions
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit lease contracts
|
|
$
|
4.8
|
|
|
$
|
5.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
2.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.1
|
|
|
$
|
9.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Percentages)
|
Gross profit percentage lease contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
(20.0
|
)
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same location
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversions
|
|
|
(14.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit percentage
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
Gross profit management contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
11.2
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
$
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
300.0
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)
|
|
|
(67.1
|
)
|
Same location
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
22.6
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
62.7
|
|
|
|
58.1
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
Conversions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit management contracts
|
|
$
|
27.3
|
|
|
$
|
27.6
|
|
|
$
|
7.2
|
|
|
$
|
4.9
|
|
|
$
|
24.5
|
|
|
$
|
21.7
|
|
|
$
|
16.8
|
|
|
$
|
15.4
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
76.8
|
|
|
$
|
69.2
|
|
|
$
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Region One
|
|
|
Region Two
|
|
|
Region Three
|
|
|
Region Four
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
(Percentages)
|
Gross profit percentage management contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
|
57.7
|
|
|
|
72.7
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
31.6
|
|
|
|
40.4
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.2
|
|
|
|
41.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
40.7
|
|
|
|
42.4
|
|
|
|
45.5
|
|
|
|
53.8
|
|
|
|
55.0
|
|
|
|
42.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
|
|
|
43.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same location
|
|
|
57.3
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
|
36.6
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
39.0
|
|
|
|
50.3
|
|
|
|
47.6
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
|
|
45.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
33.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit percentage
|
|
|
56.4
|
|
|
|
51.8
|
|
|
|
27.8
|
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
|
|
39.6
|
|
|
|
37.3
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
44.8
|
|
|
|
45.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit lease
contracts. Gross profit for lease contracts
increased $0.6 million, or 6.3%, to $10.1 million for
the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to
$9.5 million in the year-ago period. Gross profit
percentage for lease contracts increased to 7.3% for the year
ended December 31, 2010, compared to 6.8% in the year-ago
period. Gross profit lease contracts increases on same locations
were primarily the result of increased short-term parking
revenue as described under parking services revenue leased
contracts and decreased costs related to a reduction in payroll
and payroll expenses and other operating costs.
Gross profit management
contracts. Gross profit for management contracts
increased $7.6 million, or 11.0%, to $76.8 million for
the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to
$69.2 million in the year-ago period. Gross profit
percentage for management contracts decreased to 44.8% for the
year ended December 31, 2010, compared to 45.1% in the
year-ago period. Gross profit for management contracts increases
were primarily the result of our same locations, our new
locations, and conversions, partially offset by contract
expirations. Gross profit management contracts increases on same
locations were primarily the result of decreased costs
associated with reverse management contracts and the cost of
providing management services. Gross profit percentage on new
reverse management locations, which are typically lower than
fixed fee management contracts, accounted for most of the
decline on a percentage basis.
Gross profit for lease contracts increased primarily due to same
locations in region two and four due to an increase in
short-term parking revenue and a decrease in same location costs
related to a reduction in payroll and payroll related and other
operating expenses.
Gross profit management contracts increased primarily due to
regions one, two, three and four new locations, regions two,
three, four and other same locations, partially offset by
contract expirations in regions one, two, three and four. The
other region amounts in same location primarily represent prior
year insurance reserve adjustments.
General and administrative expenses. General
and administrative expenses increased $3.2 million, or
7.1%, to $47.9 million for the year ended December 31,
2010, compared to $44.7 million in the year-ago period.
This increase resulted from an increase in payroll and payroll
related expenses of $4.7 million primarily from the
restoration of performance-based compensation programs, annual
salary increases in 2010 and $0.6 million in severance
costs, partially offset by a decrease of $1.3 million in
legal-related expenses, a decrease in professional fees of
$0.4 million and a decrease of $0.4 million in other
costs.
Interest expense. Interest expense decreased
$0.7 million, or 11.3%, to $5.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $6.0 million
in the year-ago period. This decrease resulted primarily from a
decrease in borrowings.
Interest income. Interest income was
$0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 and
did not change significantly from the year-ago period.
Income tax expense. Income tax expense
increased $2.5 million, or 30.1%, to $10.8 million for
the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to
$8.3 million in the year-ago period. An increase in our
pre-tax income resulted in a $2.1 million increase in
income tax expense and an increase in our effective tax rate
32
resulted in a $0.4 million increase in income tax expense.
The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2010
was 38.6% compared to 36.8% for the year-ago period.
Results
of Operations
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
Segments
The following tables present the material factors that impact
our financial statements on an operating segment basis.
Segment revenue information is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Region One
|
|
|
Region Two
|
|
|
Region Three
|
|
|
Region Four
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Lease contract revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
$
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
2.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.3
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
158.3
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
(13.0
|
)
|
|
|
(76.5
|
)
|
Same location
|
|
|
60.9
|
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
38.7
|
|
|
|
41.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115.0
|
|
|
|
121.5
|
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
Conversions
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
(63.4
|
)
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
30.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total lease contract revenue
|
|
$
|
79.0
|
|
|
$
|
83.3
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
2.2
|
|
|
$
|
19.4
|
|
|
$
|
24.9
|
|
|
$
|
39.3
|
|
|
$
|
43.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
140.4
|
|
|
$
|
154.3
|
|
|
$
|
(13.9
|
)
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management contract revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
14.2
|
|
|
$
|
5.1
|
|
|
$
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
178.4
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
|
(15.9
|
)
|
|
|
(70.7
|
)
|
Same location
|
|
|
41.1
|
|
|
|
39.6
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
38.6
|
|
|
|
36.7
|
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
|
|
29.5
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
117.7
|
|
|
|
108.9
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
Conversions
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
59.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total management contract revenue
|
|
$
|
53.4
|
|
|
$
|
57.4
|
|
|
$
|
13.2
|
|
|
$
|
3.7
|
|
|
$
|
54.8
|
|
|
$
|
53.4
|
|
|
$
|
32.4
|
|
|
$
|
31.6
|
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
153.4
|
|
|
$
|
145.8
|
|
|
$
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parking services revenue lease
contracts. Lease contract revenue decreased
$13.9 million, or 9.0%, to $140.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, compared to $154.3 million in
the year-ago period. The decrease resulted primarily from
contract expirations exceeding increases in revenue from new
locations, and fewer leased contracts that converted from
management contracts during the current year, partially offset
by increases in revenue from our acquisitions. Same location
revenue for those facilities, which as of December 31, 2009
have been operational a minimum of 24 months, decreased
5.3%. The decrease in same location revenue was due to decreases
in short-term parking revenue of $4.3 million, or 5.1%, and
a decrease in monthly parking revenue of $2.2 million, or
5.9%. Revenue associated with contract expirations relates to
contracts that expired during the current period. In addition,
we recorded $1.4 million in 2008 related to the Hurricane
Katrina settlement, which was included in contract expirations.
Parking services revenue management
contracts. Management contract revenue increased
$7.6 million, or 5.2%, to $153.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, compared to $145.8 million in
the year-ago period. The increase resulted primarily from new
locations and acquisitions, which was partially offset by the
decrease in revenue from contract expirations. Same locations
revenue for those facilities, which as of December 31, 2009
have been operational a minimum of 24 months, increased
8.1%. In 2008, we recorded $0.2 million related to the
Hurricane Katrina settlement, which was included in contract
expirations.
Reimbursed management contract
revenue. Reimbursed management contract revenue
increased $1.1 million, or 0.3%, to $401.7 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to
$400.6 million in the year-ago period. This increase
resulted from additional reimbursements for costs incurred on
behalf of owners.
33
Regions one, two, three and four recorded a decrease in same
location revenue and contract expirations, partially offset by
increases in revenue from new locations. Same location revenue
decreased compared to prior year primarily due to a reduction in
short-term and monthly parking revenue. Contract expirations in
region three includes the $1.4 million Hurricane Katrina
settlement received in 2008 that did not recur in 2009.
Regions one, two, three and four recorded increases in
management contract revenue from new locations compared to the
prior year. Regions one, two and three recorded increases in
management contract revenue from same locations and acquisitions
compared to the prior year, primarily due to the addition of new
services to existing contracts. These increases were partially
offset by decreases in contract expirations primarily in region
one. Revenue associated with contract expirations relates to the
contracts that expired during the current period. Contract
expirations in region three includes the $0.2 million
Hurricane Katrina settlement received in 2008 that did not recur
in 2009.
Segment cost of parking services information is summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Region One
|
|
|
Region Two
|
|
|
Region Three
|
|
|
Region Four
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Cost of parking services lease contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
$
|
4.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.2
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
155.6
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
(10.4
|
)
|
|
|
(73.2
|
)
|
Same location
|
|
|
56.1
|
|
|
|
58.0
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
36.4
|
|
|
|
38.5
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
106.6
|
|
|
|
111.5
|
|
|
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
Conversions
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
(60.0
|
)
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
35.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of parking services lease contracts
|
|
$
|
73.8
|
|
|
$
|
76.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
17.5
|
|
|
$
|
21.4
|
|
|
$
|
36.9
|
|
|
$
|
40.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
130.9
|
|
|
$
|
140.1
|
|
|
$
|
(9.2
|
)
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of parking services management contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
|
$
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
184.0
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
(7.9
|
)
|
|
|
(63.2
|
)
|
Same location
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
|
17.7
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
22.7
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
62.3
|
|
|
|
48.1
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
29.5
|
|
Conversions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
64.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of parking services management contracts
|
|
$
|
25.6
|
|
|
$
|
27.7
|
|
|
$
|
8.4
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
33.2
|
|
|
$
|
26.4
|
|
|
$
|
17.0
|
|
|
$
|
17.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
84.2
|
|
|
$
|
69.3
|
|
|
$
|
14.9
|
|
|
|
21.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of parking services lease
contracts. Cost of parking services for lease
contracts decreased $9.2 million, or 6.6%, to
$130.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009,
compared to $140.1 million in the year-ago period. The
decrease resulted primarily from decreases in costs from
contract expirations and fewer locations that converted from
management contracts during the current year, which more than
offset the increases in new locations. Same locations costs for
those facilities which as of December 31, 2009 have been
operational a minimum of 24 months decreased 4.4%. Same
location costs decreased $4.1 million due to rent expense,
primarily as a result of contingent rental payments on the
decrease in revenue for same locations, $0.6 million due to
payroll and payroll related and $0.2 million related to
other operating costs.
Cost of parking services management
contracts. Cost of parking services for
management contracts increased $14.9 million, or 21.5%, to
$84.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009,
compared to $69.3 million in the year-ago period. The
increase resulted from new locations and acquisitions which more
than offset the decrease in costs from contract expirations.
There was no impact on costs for those management contracts
which converted to a lease contract. Same location costs for
those facilities, which as of December 31, 2009 have been
operational a minimum of 24 months, increased 29.5%. Same
location increase in operating expenses for management contracts
primarily resulted from negative fluctuations in prior years
34
insurance reserve adjustments, increases in costs associated
with reverse management contracts where we are responsible for
certain expenses in return for a larger management fee, and the
cost of providing management services, in addition to
$3.1 million attributable to the tentative settlement and
legal fees related to a California labor code case.
Reimbursed management contract
expense. Reimbursed management contract expense
increased $1.1 million, or 0.3%, to $401.7 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to
$400.6 million in the year-ago period. This increase
resulted from additional reimbursed cost incurred on the behalf
of owners.
Regions one, three and four experienced decreases in cost of
parking services lease contracts related to same locations. Same
location costs decreased primarily due to decreases in rent
expense primarily as a result of contingent rental payments on
the decrease in revenue for same locations and a reduction in
payroll and payroll related. Regions one and three experienced
declines in contract expirations. Cost associated with contract
expirations related to contracts that expired during the current
period.
Cost of parking services management contracts primarily
increased due to costs associated with reverse management
contracts and the cost of providing management services for same
and new locations. Included in region three same locations is
$3.1 million attributable to the tentative settlement and
legal fees related to a California labor code case recorded in
2009. The other region amounts in same location costs primarily
represent prior year insurance reserve adjustments.
Segment lease contract gross profit/gross profit percentage
information is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Region One
|
|
|
Region Two
|
|
|
Region Three
|
|
|
Region Four
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Gross profit lease contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
(92.9
|
)
|
Same location
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(16.0
|
)
|
Conversions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(83.3
|
)
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit lease contracts
|
|
$
|
5.2
|
|
|
$
|
6.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
$
|
2.4
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.5
|
|
|
$
|
14.2
|
|
|
$
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
(33.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Percentages)
|
Gross profit percentage lease contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same location
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
(40.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit percentage
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
Gross profit management contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
173.1
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
(8.0
|
)
|
|
|
(80.0
|
)
|
Same location
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
55.4
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
(8.9
|
)
|
Conversions
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit management contracts
|
|
$
|
27.8
|
|
|
$
|
29.7
|
|
|
$
|
4.8
|
|
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
|
$
|
21.6
|
|
|
$
|
27.0
|
|
|
$
|
15.4
|
|
|
$
|
14.1
|
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
|
$
|
69.2
|
|
|
$
|
76.5
|
|
|
$
|
(7.3
|
)
|
|
|
(9.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Percentages)
|
Gross profit percentage management contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New location
|
|
|
63.4
|
|
|
|
58.8
|
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
|
|
|
51.9
|
|
|
|
48.1
|
|
|
|
28.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract expirations
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
|
|
39.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
33.3
|
|
|
|
50.6
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
44.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same location
|
|
|
53.8
|
|
|
|
55.3
|
|
|
|
43.0
|
|
|
|
105.9
|
|
|
|
41.2
|
|
|
|
55.0
|
|
|
|
47.4
|
|
|
|
44.7
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
(633.3
|
)
|
|
|
47.1
|
|
|
|
55.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversions
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
46.3
|
|
|
|
53.3
|
|
|
|
30.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
22.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.6
|
|
|
|
32.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit percentage
|
|
|
52.1
|
|
|
|
51.7
|
|
|
|
36.4
|
|
|
|
102.7
|
|
|
|
39.4
|
|
|
|
50.6
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
44.6
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
(633.3
|
)
|
|
|
45.1
|
|
|
|
52.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
Gross profit lease
contracts. Gross profit for lease contracts
decreased $4.7 million, or 33.1%, to $9.5 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to
$14.2 million in the year-ago period. Gross profit
percentage for lease contracts decreased to 6.8% for the year
ended December 31, 2009, compared to 9.2% in the year-ago
period. Gross profit lease contracts decreases on same locations
were primarily the result of decreased short-term and monthly
parking revenue as described under parking services revenue
leased contracts. Gross profit lease contracts decreases on
conversions were primarily the result of fewer leased contracts
that converted from management contracts during the current year.
Gross profit management
contracts. Gross profit for management contracts
decreased $7.3 million, or 9.5%, to $69.2 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to
$76.5 million in the year-ago period. Gross profit
percentage for management contracts decreased to 45.1% for the
year ended December 31, 2009, compared to 52.5% in the
year-ago period. Gross profit for management contracts decreases
were primarily the result of our same locations and our contract
expirations. Gross profit management contracts decreases on same
locations were primarily the result of increased costs resulting
from negative fluctuations in prior year insurance reserve
adjustments, increases in costs associated with reverse
management contracts where we are responsible for certain
expenses in return for a larger management fee, and the cost of
providing management services, in addition to $3.1 million
attributable to the tentative settlement and legal fees related
to a California labor code case.
Regions one, two, three and four experienced declines in gross
profit lease contracts due to same locations primarily due to a
decline in short-term and monthly parking revenue that exceeded
the decline in costs. Region three experienced a decline in
gross profit contract expirations due to the Hurricane Katrina
settlement recorded in revenue for 2008 that did not recur in
2009.
Regions three and four experienced declines in gross profit
management contracts related to same locations, which is
primarily due to an increase in costs associated with reverse
management contracts and the cost of providing management
services, in addition to the tentative settlement and legal fees
related to a California labor code case in region three that was
recorded in cost of parking services in 2009. Region three
experienced a decline in gross profit contract expirations due
to the Hurricane Katrina settlement recorded in revenue in 2008
that did not recur in 2009.
General and administrative expenses. General
and administrative expenses decreased $2.9 million, or
6.1%, to $44.7 million for the year ended December 31,
2009, compared to $47.6 million in the year-ago period.
This decrease resulted from decreases in net payroll and payroll
related expenses of $2.4 million, a decrease in travel of
$0.5 million, a decrease in computer expenses of
$0.7 million, an increase in cost recovery of
$0.6 million, a decrease of $0.4 million related to
outsourcing fees, decreases in other costs of $0.4 million,
which was partially offset by $1.7 million incurred in
connection with the Companys transfer and secondary
offering of its former controlling shareholders shares,
and $0.4 million related to the Hurricane Katrina
settlement received in 2008 that did not recur in 2009.
Interest expense. Interest expense decreased
$0.5 million, or 7.7%, to $6.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $6.5 million
in the year-ago period. This decrease resulted primarily from a
decrease in borrowings.
Interest income. Interest income was
$0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and
did not change significantly from the year-ago period.
Income tax expense. Income tax expense
decreased $3.3 million, or 28.4%, to $8.3 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to
$11.6 million in the year-ago period. This decrease
resulted principally from taxes on decreased earnings as well as
a reduction in our effective tax rate. The effective tax rate
for the year ended December 31, 2009 was 36.8% compared to
37.7% for the year-ago period.
Unaudited
Quarterly Results
The following table sets forth our unaudited quarterly
consolidated statement of income data for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The unaudited
quarterly information has been prepared on the same basis as the
annual financial information and, in managements opinion,
includes all adjustments
36
(consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to
present fairly the information for the quarters presented.
Historically, our operating results have varied from quarter to
quarter and are expected to continue to fluctuate in the future.
These fluctuations have been due to a number of factors,
including: general economic conditions in our markets; additions
of contracts; expiration and termination of contracts;
conversion of lease contracts to management contracts;
conversion of management contracts to lease contracts and
changes in terms of contracts that are retained. The operating
results for any historical quarter are not necessarily
indicative of results for any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Quarters Ended
|
|
|
2009 Quarters Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Parking services revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
$
|
33,116
|
|
|
$
|
34,162
|
|
|
$
|
35,713
|
|
|
$
|
35,673
|
|
|
$
|
34,700
|
|
|
$
|
35,687
|
|
|
$
|
35,576
|
|
|
$
|
34,478
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
40,075
|
|
|
|
42,081
|
|
|
|
43,713
|
|
|
|
45,462
|
|
|
|
38,293
|
|
|
|
37,311
|
|
|
|
39,266
|
|
|
|
38,512
|
|
Reimbursed management contract revenue
|
|
|
106,055
|
|
|
|
100,757
|
|
|
|
101,500
|
|
|
|
102,836
|
|
|
|
102,558
|
|
|
|
97,595
|
|
|
|
97,480
|
|
|
|
104,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
179,246
|
|
|
|
177,000
|
|
|
|
180,926
|
|
|
|
183,971
|
|
|
|
175,551
|
|
|
|
170,593
|
|
|
|
172,322
|
|
|
|
177,028
|
|
Cost of parking services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
31,771
|
|
|
|
31,217
|
|
|
|
32,714
|
|
|
|
32,911
|
|
|
|
32,949
|
|
|
|
32,932
|
|
|
|
32,899
|
|
|
|
32,117
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
22,264
|
|
|
|
22,278
|
|
|
|
24,357
|
|
|
|
25,582
|
|
|
|
20,391
|
|
|
|
19,938
|
|
|
|
20,696
|
|
|
|
23,142
|
|
Reimbursed management contract revenue
|
|
|
106,055
|
|
|
|
100,757
|
|
|
|
101,500
|
|
|
|
102,836
|
|
|
|
102,558
|
|
|
|
97,595
|
|
|
|
97,480
|
|
|
|
104,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of parking services
|
|
|
160,090
|
|
|
|
154,252
|
|
|
|
158,571
|
|
|
|
161,329
|
|
|
|
155,898
|
|
|
|
150,465
|
|
|
|
151,075
|
|
|
|
159,297
|
|
Gross profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
1,345
|
|
|
|
2,945
|
|
|
|
2,999
|
|
|
|
2,762
|
|
|
|
1,751
|
|
|
|
2,755
|
|
|
|
2,677
|
|
|
|
2,361
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
17,811
|
|
|
|
19,803
|
|
|
|
19,356
|
|
|
|
19,880
|
|
|
|
17,902
|
|
|
|
17,373
|
|
|
|
18,570
|
|
|
|
15,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
|
19,156
|
|
|
|
22,748
|
|
|
|
22,355
|
|
|
|
22,642
|
|
|
|
19,653
|
|
|
|
20,128
|
|
|
|
21,247
|
|
|
|
17,731
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
11,560
|
|
|
|
12,218
|
|
|
|
11,549
|
|
|
|
12,551
|
|
|
|
12,761
|
|
|
|
10,320
|
|
|
|
11,295
|
|
|
|
10,331
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,460
|
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
|
|
1,527
|
|
|
|
1,517
|
|
|
|
1,487
|
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
6,136
|
|
|
|
8,960
|
|
|
|
9,279
|
|
|
|
8,574
|
|
|
|
5,405
|
|
|
|
8,395
|
|
|
|
8,370
|
|
|
|
6,054
|
|
Other expense (income):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,490
|
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
1,286
|
|
|
|
1,161
|
|
|
|
1,436
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
1,546
|
|
|
|
1,502
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
1,369
|
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
1,492
|
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
4,699
|
|
|
|
7,614
|
|
|
|
8,049
|
|
|
|
7,501
|
|
|
|
4,036
|
|
|
|
6,962
|
|
|
|
6,878
|
|
|
|
4,604
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
1,847
|
|
|
|
3,021
|
|
|
|
3,124
|
|
|
|
2,763
|
|
|
|
1,574
|
|
|
|
2,692
|
|
|
|
2,654
|
|
|
|
1,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
2,852
|
|
|
|
4,593
|
|
|
|
4,925
|
|
|
|
4,738
|
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
4,270
|
|
|
|
4,224
|
|
|
|
3,259
|
|
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Standard Parking Corporation
|
|
$
|
2,845
|
|
|
$
|
4,508
|
|
|
$
|
4,836
|
|
|
$
|
4,651
|
|
|
$
|
2,398
|
|
|
$
|
4,228
|
|
|
$
|
4,186
|
|
|
$
|
3,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
15,390,514
|
|
|
|
15,531,726
|
|
|
|
15,651,586
|
|
|
|
15,736,906
|
|
|
|
15,296,282
|
|
|
|
15,251,310
|
|
|
|
15,277,601
|
|
|
|
15,346,452
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
15,804,599
|
|
|
|
15,877,258
|
|
|
|
15,993,631
|
|
|
|
16,096,486
|
|
|
|
15,628,952
|
|
|
|
15,696,136
|
|
|
|
15,696,136
|
|
|
|
15,755,494
|
|
37
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Outstanding
Indebtedness
On December 31, 2010, we had total indebtedness of
approximately $97.9 million, a decrease of
$15.3 million from December 31, 2009. The
$97.9 million includes:
|
|
|
|
|
$95.2 million under our senior credit facility; and
|
|
|
|
$2.7 million of other debt including capital lease
obligations and obligations on seller notes and other
indebtedness.
|
We believe that our cash flow from operations, combined with
additional borrowing capacity under our senior credit facility,
which amounted to $45.2 million at December 31, 2010,
will be sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness, or to
fund other liquidity needs. We may need to refinance all or a
portion of our indebtedness on or before their respective
maturities. We believe that we will be able to refinance our
indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms.
Senior
Credit Facility
On July 15, 2008, we amended and restated our credit
facility.
The $210.0 million revolving senior credit facility will
expire on June 29, 2013. The revolving senior credit
facility includes a letter of credit sub-facility with a
sublimit of $50.0 million. The $50.0 million letter of
credit sub-facility does not limit the maximum actual borrowings
on the revolving senior credit facility.
Our revolving senior credit facility bears interest, at our
option, at either (1) LIBOR plus an applicable LIBOR margin
of between 2.00% and 3.50% depending on the ratio of our total
funded indebtedness to our EBITDA from time to time (Total
Debt Ratio) or (2) the Base Rate (as defined below)
plus an applicable Base Rate Margin of between 0.50% and 2.00%
depending on our Total Debt Ratio. We may elect interest periods
of one, two, three or six months for LIBOR based borrowings. The
Base Rate is the greater of (i) the rate publicly announced
from time to time by Bank of America, N.A. as its prime
rate, or (ii) the overnight federal funds rate plus
0.50%.
Certain financial covenants limit the Companys capacity to
fully draw on its $210.0 million revolving credit facility.
Our senior credit facility includes a fixed charge ratio
covenant, a total debt to EBITDA ratio covenant, a limit on our
ability to incur additional indebtedness, issue preferred stock
or pay dividends, and certain other restrictions on our
activities. We are required to repay borrowings under our senior
credit facility out of the proceeds of future issuances of debt
or equity securities and asset sales, subject to certain
customary exceptions. Our senior credit facility is secured by
substantially all of our assets and all assets acquired in the
future (including a pledge of 100% of the stock of our existing
and future domestic guarantor subsidiaries and 65% of the stock
of our existing and future foreign subsidiaries).
We are in compliance with all of our financial covenants.
At December 31, 2010, we had $16.8 million of letters
of credit outstanding under the senior credit facility,
borrowings against the senior credit facility aggregated
$95.2 million and we had $45.2 million available under
the senior credit facility.
Interest
Rate Cap Transactions
We do not enter into derivative instruments for any purpose
other than cash flow hedging purposes.
In 2006 we entered into an interest rate cap transaction with
Bank of America, which allowed us to limit our exposure on a
portion of our borrowings under our senior credit facility.
Under the rate cap transaction, we received payments from Bank
of America each quarterly period to the extent that the
prevailing three month LIBOR during that period exceeded our cap
rate of 5.75%. The rate cap transaction capped our LIBOR
interest rate on a notional amount of $50.0 million at
5.75% for a total of 36 months. The rate cap transaction
began as of August 4, 2006 and was settled each quarter on
a date that coincided with our quarterly interest
38
payment dates under our senior credit facility. This rate cap
transaction was classified as a cash flow hedge, and we
calculated the effectiveness of the hedge on a quarterly basis.
The ineffective portion of the cash flow hedge was recognized in
current period earnings as an increase of interest expense.
Total changes in the fair value of the rate cap transaction for
the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 were immaterial.
The rate cap transaction expired on August 4, 2009.
On February 22, 2010, we entered into interest rate cap
agreements with Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
(Wells Fargo) and Fifth Third Bank (Fifth
Third), allowing us to limit our exposure on a portion of
our borrowings under our senior credit facility (Rate Cap
Transactions). Pursuant to two separate letter agreements
between the Company and Wells Fargo and Fifth Third,
respectively, we will receive payments from Wells Fargo and
Fifth Third each quarterly period to the extent that the
prevailing three month LIBOR during that period exceeds our cap
rate of 3.25%. The Rate Cap Transactions are effective
March 31, 2010, and will settle each quarter on a date that
is intended to coincide with our quarterly interest payment
dates under our senior credit facility. The Rate Cap
Transactions cap our LIBOR interest rate on a notional amount of
$50.0 million at 3.25% for a total of 39 months and
expires on June 28, 2013. These Rate Cap Transactions are
classified as a cash flow hedge, and we calculate the
effectiveness of the hedge on a quarterly basis. The ineffective
portion of the cash flow hedge is recognized in current period
earnings as an increase of interest expense. The fair value of
the interest rate cap at December 31, 2010 is
$0.2 million and is included in prepaid expenses
Stock
Repurchases
No share repurchases were made by us in
2010. As of December 31, 2010,
$19.0 million remained available for repurchase under the
July 2008 share repurchase authorization by the Board of
Directors.
Letters
of Credit
At December 31, 2010, we have provided letters of credit
totaling $16.5 million to our casualty insurance carriers
to collateralize our casualty insurance program.
As of December 31, 2010, we provided $0.3 million in
letters of credit to collateralize other obligations.
Deficiency
Payments
Pursuant to our obligations with respect to the parking garage
operations at Bradley International Airport, we are required to
make certain payments for the benefit of the State of
Connecticut and for holders of special facility revenue bonds.
The deficiency payments represent contingent interest bearing
advances to the trustee to cover operating cash flow
requirements. The payments, if any, are recorded as a receivable
by us for which we are reimbursed from time to time as provided
in the trust agreement. As of December 31, 2010, we have a
receivable of $12.1 million, comprised of cumulative
deficiency payments to the trustee, net of reimbursements. We
believe these advances to be fully recoverable and therefore
have not recorded a valuation allowance for them. We do not
guarantee the payment of any principal or interest on any debt
obligations of the State of Connecticut or the trustee.
We made deficiency payments (net of repayments received) of
$2.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2010
compared to deficiency payments (net of repayments received) of
$3.6 million made in the year ended December 31, 2009.
In addition, we received $31 thousand on deficiency repayments
from the trustee for premium income in the year ended
December 31, 2010 compared to $0 in the year ended
December 31, 2009. We did not record or receive any
interest on deficiency repayments from the trustee in the years
ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (see
Note Q to our consolidated financial statements).
Capital
Leases
We incurred no new capital lease obligations for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009.
39
Lease
Commitments
We have minimum lease commitments of $35.1 million for
fiscal 2011. The leased properties generate sufficient cash flow
to meet the base rent payment.
Daily
Cash Collections
As a result of day-to-day activity at our parking locations, we
collect significant amounts of cash. Lease contract revenue is
generally deposited into our local bank accounts, with a portion
remitted to our clients in the form of rental payments according
to the terms of the leases. Under management contracts, some
clients require us to deposit the daily receipts into one of our
local bank accounts, with the cash in excess of our operating
expenses and management fees remitted to the clients at
negotiated intervals. Other clients require us to deposit the
daily receipts into client accounts and the clients then
reimburse us for operating expenses and pay our management fee
subsequent to month-end. Some clients require a segregated
account for the receipts and disbursements at locations. Our
working capital and liquidity may be adversely affected if a
significant number of our clients require us to deposit all
parking revenues into their respective accounts.
Our liquidity also fluctuates on an intra-month and intra-year
basis depending on the contract mix and timing of significant
cash payments. Additionally, our ability to utilize cash
deposited into our local accounts is dependent upon the
availability and movement of that cash into our corporate
account. For all these reasons, from time to time, we carry a
significant cash balance, while also utilizing our senior credit
facility.
Net
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Our primary sources of funds are cash flows from operating
activities and changes in working capital. Net cash provided by
operating activities totaled $19.5 million for 2010,
compared to $21.8 million for 2009. Cash provided during
2010 included $27.5 million from operations, which was
offset by a net decrease in working capital of
$8.0 million. The decrease in working capital resulted
primarily from (i) an increase in notes and accounts
receivable by $9.7 million which primarily related to an
increase in business from new locations and our acquisitions;
(ii) an increase in other assets by $1.9 million which
primarily related to an increase in the cash surrender values
related to the non-qualified deferred compensation plan and an
increase in event and equipment deposits; (iii) a decrease
in accounts payable by $5.1 million which primarily
resulted from the timing on payments to our clients and new
business that are under management contracts as described under
Daily Cash Collections offset by a decrease of
$2.7 million in prepaid assets primarily related to timing
of payroll taxes paid in 2009 related to 2010 payroll and timing
of insurance premium payments; and an increase in other
liabilities of $6.0 million primarily related to increases
in performance-based compensation, accrued severance and timing
related payroll accrual.
Our primary sources of funds are cash flows from operating
activities and changes in working capital. Net cash provided by
operating activities totaled $21.8 million for 2009,
compared to $29.6 million for 2008. Cash provided during
2009 included $27.5 million from operations, which was
offset by a net decrease in working capital of
$5.7 million. The decrease in working capital resulted
primarily from an increase in notes and accounts receivable by
$1.9 million which primarily related to an increase in
business from new locations and our acquisitions, an increase in
other assets by $1.8 million which primarily related to an
increase in the cash surrender values related to the
non-qualified deferred compensation plan and deposits, an
increase in prepaid assets by $2.2 million which primarily
related to increases in prepaid insurance and prepaid taxes, an
increase in accounts payable by $2.0 million which
primarily resulted from the timing on payments to our clients
and new business that are under management contracts as
described under Daily Cash Collections, and a
decrease in accrued liabilities by $1.8 million which
primarily related to a settlement of a payout accrued for a
prior year acquisition.
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $7.7 million
in 2010 compared to $7.1 million in 2009. Cash used in
investing activities for 2010 included business acquisitions of
$3.6 million, capital expenditures of $3.0 million for
capital investments needed to secure
and/or
extend lease facilities, investment in information
40
system enhancements and infrastructure, cost of contract
purchases of $0.7 million, capitalized interest of
$0.1 million and $0.3 million for contingent payments
on previously acquired businesses.
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $7.1 million
in 2009 compared to $13.0 million in 2008. Cash used in
investing activities for 2009 included business acquisitions of
$2.5 million, capital expenditures of $3.5 million for
capital investments needed to secure
and/or
extend lease facilities, investment in information system
enhancements and infrastructure, cost of contract purchases of
$0.9 million and $0.3 million for contingent payments
on previously acquired contracts, which was partially offset by
$0.1 million of proceeds from the sale of assets.
Net
Cash Used in Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $12.9 million
in 2010 compared to $15.0 million in 2009. Cash used in
financing activities for 2010 included $0.5 million for
earn-out payments, $0.5 million used for payments on
capital leases, $14.7 million use for payments on senior
credit facility, $0.1 million used for payments on other
long-term borrowings, $0.3 million distributed to
noncontrolling interest, offset by $1.8 million in proceeds
from the exercise of stock options and $1.4 million in
excess tax benefits related to stock option exercises.
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $15.0 million
in 2009 compared to $16.2 million in 2008. Cash used in
financing activities for 2009 included $3.9 million used to
repurchase our common stock, $1.0 million used for payments
on capital leases, $10.8 million use for payments on senior
credit facility, $0.1 million used for payments on other
long-term borrowings, $0.1 million distributed to
noncontrolling interest, offset by $0.4 million in proceeds
from the exercise of stock options and $0.5 million in
excess tax benefits related to stock option exercises.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
We had cash and cash equivalents of $7.3 million at
December 31, 2010, compared to $8.3 million at
December 31, 2009 and $8.3 million at
December 31, 2008. The cash balances reflect our ability to
utilize funds deposited into our local accounts and which based
upon availability, timing of deposits and the subsequent
movement of that cash into our corporate accounts may result in
significant changes to our cash balances.
Summary
Disclosures about Contractual Obligations and Commercial
Commitments
The following summarizes certain of our contractual obligations
at December 31, 2010 and the effect such obligations are
expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future
periods. The nature of our business is to manage parking
facilities. As a result, we do not have significant short-term
purchase obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1 - 3 Years
|
|
|
4 - 5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
$
|
103,332
|
|
|
$
|
2,875
|
|
|
$
|
99,822
|
|
|
$
|
412
|
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
Operating leases(2)
|
|
|
99,660
|
|
|
|
35,147
|
|
|
|
47,452
|
|
|
|
8,611
|
|
|
|
8,450
|
|
Capital leases(3)
|
|
|
1,624
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities(4)
|
|
|
33,608
|
|
|
|
8,931
|
|
|
|
16,323
|
|
|
|
2,017
|
|
|
|
6,337
|
|
Letters of credit(5)
|
|
|
16,773
|
|
|
|
6,477
|
|
|
|
10,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(6)
|
|
$
|
254,997
|
|
|
$
|
54,003
|
|
|
$
|
174,944
|
|
|
$
|
11,040
|
|
|
$
|
15,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents principal amounts and interest. See Note H to
our consolidated financial statements. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents minimum rental commitments, excluding contingent rent
provisions under all non-cancelable leases. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents principal amounts and interest on capital lease
obligations. See Note O to our consolidated financial
statements. |
41
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Represents deferred compensation, customer deposits, insurance
claims, obligation related to acquisitions, sales tax on capital
leases and deferred partnership fees. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents amount of currently issued letters of credit at their
maturities. |
|
(6) |
|
$95.2 million in long-term debt and $16.8 million of
letters of credit are subject to a variable interest rate. The
interest rate used to estimate future interest payment subject
to variable debt included in our table is 2.6%, which represents
the weighted average interest rate on our variable debt in
effect as of December 31, 2010. |
In addition we made contingent earnout payments of
$0.3 million, $0.3 million and $0.3 million for
the years ended 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. We made
deficiency payments related to Bradley of $2.5 million,
$3.6 million and $2.2 million for the years ended
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. No amounts have been included
on the above schedule related to those payments for future
periods as the amounts, if any, are not presently determinable.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations discusses our
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. Accounting estimates are an integral
part of the preparation of the financial statements and the
financial reporting process and are based upon current
judgments. The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reported period. Certain accounting
estimates are particularly sensitive because of their complexity
and the possibility that future events affecting them may differ
materially from our current judgments and estimates.
This listing of critical accounting policies is not intended to
be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. In
many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction
is specifically dictated by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America, with no need for
managements judgment regarding accounting policy. We
believe that of our significant accounting policies, the
following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity:
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill
As of December 31, 2010, our net long-lived assets were
comprised primarily of $16.8 million of property, equipment
and leasehold improvements and $15.6 million of contract
and lease rights. In accounting for our long-lived assets, other
than goodwill, we apply the provisions of the guidance related
to accounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and
long-lived assets to be disposed of. We account for goodwill and
other intangible assets under the provisions of the guidance
related to goodwill and other intangible assets. As of
December 31, 2010, we had $132.2 million of goodwill.
The determination and measurement of an impairment loss under
these accounting standards require the significant use of
judgment and estimates. The determination of fair value of these
assets utilizes cash flow projections that assume certain future
revenue and cost levels, assumed discount rates based upon
current market conditions and other valuation factors, all of
which involve the use of significant judgment and estimation.
For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 we were not
required to record any impairment charges related to long-lived
assets or to goodwill. Future events may indicate differences
from our judgments and estimates which could, in turn, result in
impairment charges in the future. Future events that may result
in impairment charges include increases in interest rates, which
would impact discount rates, unfavorable economic conditions or
other factors which could decrease revenues and profitability of
existing locations and changes in the cost structure of existing
facilities. Factors that could potentially have an unfavorable
economic effect on our judgments and estimates include, among
others: changes imposed by governmental and regulatory agencies,
such as property condemnations and assessment of parking-related
taxes; construction or other events that could change traffic
patterns; and terrorism or other catastrophic events.
42
Insurance
Reserves
We purchase comprehensive casualty insurance (including, without
limitation, general liability, automobile liability,
garage-keepers legal liability, workers compensation and
umbrella/excess liability insurance) covering certain claims
that arise in connection with our operations. Under our various
liability and workers compensation insurance policies, we
are obligated to reimburse the insurance carrier for the first
$250,000 of any loss. As a result, we are, in effect,
self-insured for all claims up to the deductible levels. We
apply the provisions of the guidance related to accounting for
contingencies, in determining the timing and amount of expense
recognition associated with claims against us. The expense
recognition is based upon our determination of an unfavorable
outcome of a claim being deemed as probable and reasonably
estimated, as defined in the guidance related to accounting for
contingencies. This determination requires the use of judgment
in both the estimation of probability and the amount to be
recognized as an expense. We utilize historical claims
experience along with regular input from third party insurance
advisors and actuaries in determining the required level of
insurance reserves. Future information regarding historical loss
experience may require changes to the level of insurance
reserves and could result in increased expense recognition in
the future.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
We report accounts receivable, net of an allowance for doubtful
accounts, to represent our estimate of the amount that
ultimately will be realized in cash. Management reviews the
adequacy of its allowance for doubtful accounts on an ongoing
basis, using historical collection trends, aging of receivables,
and a review of specific accounts, and makes adjustments in the
allowance as necessary. Changes in economic conditions or other
circumstances could have an impact on the collection of existing
receivable balances or future allowance considerations.
Income
Taxes
We use the asset and liability method to account for income
taxes, in accordance with the guidance related to accounting for
income taxes. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates to apply to taxable income in
the years in which those temporary differences are expected to
be recovered or settled. We have certain federal net operating
loss carry forwards which expire between 2022 and 2024. Our
ability to fully utilize these net operating losses to offset
taxable income is limited due to the change in ownership
resulting from the initial public offering of our stock in 2004
(Internal Revenue Code Section 382). We consider a number
of factors in our assessment of the recoverability of our net
operating loss carryforwards including their expiration dates,
the limitations imposed due to the change in ownership as well
as future projections of income. Future changes in our operating
performance along with these considerations may significantly
impact the amount of net operating losses ultimately recovered,
and our assessment of their recoverability.
Legal
and Other Contingencies
We are subject to litigation in the normal course of our
business. The outcomes of legal proceedings and claims brought
against us and other loss contingencies are subject to
significant uncertainty. We accrue a charge against income when
our management determines that it is probable that an asset has
been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount of
loss can be reasonably estimated. In addition, we accrue for the
authoritative judgments or assertions made against us by
government agencies at the time of their rendering regardless of
our intent to appeal. In determining the appropriate accounting
for loss contingencies, we consider the likelihood of loss or
impairment of an asset or the incurrence of a liability, as well
as our ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss. We
regularly evaluate current information available to us to
determine whether an accrual should be established or adjusted.
Estimating the probability that a loss will occur and estimating
the amount of a loss or a range of loss involves significant
judgment.
43
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
Interest
Rates
Our primary market risk exposure consists of risk related to
changes in interest rates. We use a variable rate senior credit
facility to finance our operations. This facility exposes us to
variability in interest payments due to changes in interest
rates. If interest rates increase, interest expense increases
and conversely, if interest rates decrease, interest expense
also decreases. We believe that it is prudent to limit the
exposure of an increase in interest rates.
We do not enter into derivative instruments for any purpose
other than cash flow hedging purposes.
On February 22, 2010, we entered into interest rate cap
agreements with Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (Wells Fargo)
and Fifth Third Bank (Fifth Third), allowing us to
limit our exposure on a portion of our borrowings under our
senior credit facility (Rate Cap Transactions).
Pursuant to two separate letter agreements between the Company
and Wells Fargo and Fifth Third, respectively, we will receive
payments from Wells Fargo and Fifth Third each quarterly period
to the extent that the prevailing three month LIBOR during that
period exceeds our cap rate of 3.25%. The Rate Cap Transactions
are effective March 31, 2010, and will settle each quarter
on a date that is intended to coincide with our quarterly
interest payment dates under our senior credit facility. The
Rate Cap Transactions cap our LIBOR interest rate on a notional
amount of $50.0 million at 3.25% for a total of
39 months and expires on June 28, 2013. These Rate Cap
Transactions are classified as a cash flow hedge, and we
calculate the effectiveness of the hedge on a quarterly basis.
The ineffective portion of the cash flow hedge is recognized in
current period earnings as an increase of interest expense. The
fair value of the interest rate cap at December 31, 2010 is
$0.2 million and is included in prepaid expenses.
Our $210.0 million senior credit facility provides for a
$210.0 million variable rate revolving facility. In
addition, the credit facility includes a letter of credit
sub-facility with a sublimit of $50.0 million and swing
line sub-facility with a sublimit of $10.0 million.
Interest expense on such borrowing is sensitive to changes in
the market rate of interest. If we were to borrow the entire
$220.0 million available under the facility, a 1% increase
in the average market rate would result in an increase in our
annual interest expense of $0.2 million.
This amount is determined by considering the impact of the
hypothetical interest rates on our borrowing cost, but does not
consider the effects of the reduced level of overall economic
activity that could exist in such an environment. Due to the
uncertainty of the specific changes and their possible effects,
the foregoing sensitivity analysis assumes no changes in our
financial structure.
Foreign
Currency Risk
Our exposure to foreign exchange risk is minimal. All foreign
investments are denominated in U.S. dollars, with the
exception of Canada. We had approximately $0.7 million of
Canadian dollar denominated cash instruments at
December 31, 2010. We had no Canadian dollar denominated
debt instruments at December 31, 2010. We do not hold any
hedging instruments related to foreign currency transactions. We
monitor foreign currency positions and may enter into certain
hedging instruments in the future should we determine that
exposure to foreign exchange risk has increased.
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
The financial statements required by this Item are attached to
and are hereby incorporated into this report.
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this annual report, our
chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and corporate
controller carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures
as such term is defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act). Based upon their evaluation, our chief executive
officer, chief financial officer, and corporate controller
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
adequate and effective and designed to ensure that material
information relating to us (including our consolidated
subsidiaries) required to be disclosed by us in the reports we
file under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the required time periods.
44
Changes
in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There were no significant changes in our internal controls over
financial reporting or any other factors that could
significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of
the evaluation referred to above.
Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term
is defined in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(f).
Our internal control system is designed to provide reasonable
assurance to our management and board of directors regarding the
preparation and fair presentation of published financial
statements. Under the supervision and with the participation of
our management, including our chief executive officer, chief
financial officer and corporate controller, we conducted an
evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting based on the framework in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee on
Sponsoring Organization of the Treadway Commission (COSO
Framework). Based on our evaluation under the COSO
Framework, our management concluded that our internal control
over financial reporting was effective as of December 31,
2010.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2010 has been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered certified
public accounting firm, as stated in their attestation report,
which is included herein.
Limitations
of the Effectiveness of Internal Control
A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can
provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of the internal control system are met. Because of
the inherent limitations of any internal control system, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all
control issues, if any, within a company have been detected.
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
Information required by this item with respect to our directors
and compliance by our directors, executive officers and certain
beneficial owners of our common stock with Section 16(a) of
the Exchange Act is incorporated by reference to all information
under the captions entitled Board and Corporate Governance
Matters and Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance from our Proxy Statement.
Executive
Officers of the Registrant
The table below sets forth certain information as of
March 4, 2011 regarding our executive officers of the
Company, each of whom is elected by and serves at the pleasure
of the Board of Directors. The business experience shown for
each officer has been his principal occupation for at least the
past five years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
James A. Wilhelm
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
President; Chief Executive Officer; Director
|
G. Marc Baumann
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Executive Vice President; Chief Financial Officer; Treasurer
|
Thomas L. Hagerman
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Executive Vice President; Chief Operating Officer
|
Gerard M. Klaisle
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Executive Vice President; Chief Human Resource Officer
|
John Ricchiuto
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Executive Vice President of Operations
|
Robert N. Sacks
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Executive Vice President; General Counsel and Secretary
|
Edward E. Simmons
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Executive Vice President of Operations
|
Steven A. Warshauer
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Executive Vice President of Operations
|
Michael K. Wolf
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Executive Vice President; Chief Administrative Officer;
Associate General Counsel
|
45
James A. Wilhelm has served as our president since
September 2000 and as our chief executive officer and a director
since October 2001. Mr. Wilhelm served as our executive
vice president-operations from March 1998 to September 1999, and
he served as our senior executive vice president and chief
operations officer from September 1999 to August 2000.
Mr. Wilhelm joined the predecessors of Standard Parking
Corporation in 1985, serving as executive vice president
beginning in January 1998. Prior to March 1998, Mr. Wilhelm
was responsible for managing the Midwest and Western Regions,
which included parking facilities in Chicago and sixteen other
cities throughout the United States and Canada. Mr. Wilhelm
received his B.A. degree from Northeastern Illinois University
in 1976.
G. Marc Baumann has served as our executive vice
president, chief financial officer and treasurer since October
2000. Prior to his appointment as our chief financial officer,
Mr. Baumann was chief financial officer for Warburtons Ltd.
in Bolton, England from January 1993 to October 2000.
Mr. Baumann is a certified public accountant and a member
of both the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
and the Illinois CPA Society. He received his B.S. degree
in 1977 from Northwestern University and his M.B.A. degree from
the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University in
1979.
Thomas L. Hagerman has served as our executive vice
president and chief operating officer since October 2007. He
also served as our executive vice president of operations from
July 2004 through September 2007, and as a senior vice president
from March 1998 through June 2004. He received his B.A. degree
in marketing from The Ohio State University in 1984, and a B.A.
degree in business administration and finance from Almeda
University in 2004.
Gerard M. Klaisle has served as our executive vice
president and chief human resource officer since February 2010.
He served as our senior vice president human
resources from April 2005 through January 2010. Prior to joining
our company, Mr. Klaisle was senior vice president of human
resources for USF Corporation, a trucking and logistics
company, from April 2001 through December 2004. Prior to joining
USF Corporation, Mr. Klaisle served 18 years with
Midas, Inc. where he rose from director of labor relations to
senior vice president, human resources. Mr. Klaisle earned
a B.S. degree from LeMoyne College in 1975 and his M.B.A. from
Loyola University in Chicago in 1979.
John Ricchiuto has served as our executive vice president
of operations since December 2002. Mr. Ricchiuto joined a
predecessor of Standard Parking in 1980 as a management trainee.
He served as vice president of Airport Properties Central from
1993 until 1994, and as senior vice president of Airport
Properties Central and Eastern United States from 1994 until
2002. Mr. Ricchiuto received his B.S. degree from
Bowling Green University in 1979.
Robert N. Sacks has served as our executive vice
president of general counsel and secretary since March 1998.
Mr. Sacks joined a predecessor of Standard Parking in 1988,
and served as general counsel and secretary since 1988, as vice
president, secretary, and general counsel from 1989, and as
senior vice president, secretary and general counsel from 1997
to March 1998. Mr. Sacks received his B.A. degree, cum
laude, from Northwestern University in 1976 and, in 1979,
received his J.D. degree from Suffolk University where he was a
member of the Suffolk University Law Review.
Edward E. Simmons has served as our executive vice
president of operations since August 1999 and as senior vice
president of operations from May 1998 to July 1999.
Mr. Simmons has served as president of S.P. Plus
Security Services, our affiliate, since 2006. Prior to joining
our Company, Mr. Simmons was president, chief executive
officer and co-founder of Executive Parking, Inc.
Mr. Simmons is currently a member of the International
Parking Institute. Mr. Simmons is a past executive board
member of the Parking Association of California.
Steven A. Warshauer has served as our executive vice
president of operations since March 1998. Mr. Warshauer
joined a predecessor of Standard Parking in 1982, initially
serving as vice president, then becoming senior vice president.
Mr. Warshauer received his B.S. Degree from the University
of Northern Colorado in 1976 with a major in Accounting.
Michael K. Wolf has served as our executive vice
president, chief administrative officer and associate general
counsel since March 1998. Mr. Wolf served as senior vice
president and general counsel of a
46
predecessor of Standard Parking from 1990 to January 1998.
Mr. Wolf received his B.A. degree in 1971 from the
University of Pennsylvania and in 1974 received his J.D. degree
from Washington University, where he served as an editor of the
Washington University Law Quarterly and was elected to
the Order of the Coif.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to all information under the caption entitled
Compensation Discussion and Analysis,
Compensation Committee Report, Executive
Compensation, and Director Compensation,
included in our Proxy Statement.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to all information under the caption entitled
Security Ownership-Beneficial Ownership of Directors and
Executive Officers and Security Ownership-Beneficial
Ownership of More Than Five Percent of Common Stock
included in our Proxy Statement.
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to all information under the caption
Transactions with Related Persons and Control
Persons and Board and Corporate Governance
Matters included in our Proxy Statement.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to all information under the caption Audit
Committee Disclosure included in our Proxy Statement.
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
(a) Financial Statements and Schedules
|
|
|
|
|
1. Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
2. Financial Statement Schedule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
All other schedules are omitted since the required information
is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to
require submission of the schedule, or because the information
required is included in the consolidated financial statements or
the notes thereto.
47
Exhibit Listing
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Company filed on June 2, 2004 (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
|
3.1.1
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Second Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company effective as of
January 7, 2008 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1.1 of
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 13,
2009).
|
|
3.1.2
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Second Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company effective as of
April 29, 2010 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1.3 of
the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August
6, 2010).
|
|
3.1.3
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Second Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company effective as of May
6, 2010 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1.4 of the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 6,
2010).
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company dated January
1, 2010 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 of the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27,
2010).
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
Specimen common stock certificate (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 4.1 of Amendment No. 2 to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-112652, filed
on May 18, 2004).
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated July 15, 2008 among
the Company, various financial institutions, Bank of America,
N.A., and Wells Fargo, N.A. (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
field on July 18, 2008).
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
Rate Cap Transaction Letter Agreement dated March 1, 2010
betweeen the Company and Wells Fargo (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed on March 8, 2010).
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
Rate Cap Transaction Letter Agreement dated March 1, 2010
between the Company and Fifth Third (incorporated by reference
to exhibit 10.2 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on March 8, 2010.
|
|
10.4+
|
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of March 30, 1998 between the
Company and Myron C. Warshauer (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.6 of the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-4, File No. 333-50437, filed on April 17, 1998).
|
|
10.4.1+
|
|
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated July 7, 2003
between the Company and Myron C. Warshauer (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.4.1 of the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed for December 31, 2004).
|
|
10.4.2+
|
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of May 10, 2004
between the Company and Myron C. Warshauer (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.4.2 of the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed for December 31, 2004).
|
|
10.5+
|
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of March 26, 1998 between the
Company and Michael K. Wolf (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.12 of the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-4, File No. 333-50437, filed on April 17, 1998).
|
|
10.5.1+
|
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of June 19, 2000
between the Company and Michael K. Wolf (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.5.1 of the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-112652, filed on February
10, 2004).
|
|
10.5.2+
|
|
|
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of December 6,
2000, between the Company and Michael K. Wolf, (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.22 to the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed for December 31, 2000).
|
|
10.5.3+
|
|
|
Third Amendment to Employment Agreement dated April 1, 2002
between the Company and Michael K. Wolf (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.19.3 to the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed for December 31, 2002).
|
|
10.5.4+
|
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement dated December 31, 2003
between the Company and Michael K. Wolf (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.5.4 of the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-112652, filed on February
10, 2004).
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10.5.5+
|
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Employment Agreement dated December 18, 2008
between the Company and Michael K. Wolf (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.5.5 of the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed on March 13, 2009).
|
|
10.5.6+
|
|
|
Sixth Amendment to Employment Agreement dated January 28, 2009
between the Company and Michael K. Wolf (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.3 of the Companys Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on February 3, 2009).
|
|
10.6+
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement dated as of
January 28, 2009 between Company and James A. Wilhelm
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 of the Companys
Current Report of Form 8-K filed on February 3, 2009).
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
Employment Agreement dated May 18, 1998 between the Company and
Robert N. Sacks (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.24 of
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for December
31, 2001).
|
|
10.7.1+
|
|
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 7,
2001 between the Company and Robert N. Sacks (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.25 of the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed for December 31, 2001).
|
|
10.7.2+
|
|
|
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of August 1,
2003 between the Company and Robert N. Sacks (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.7.2 of the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-112652, filed on February
10, 2004).
|
|
10.7.3+
|
|
|
Third Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of April 1,
2005 between the Company and Robert N. Sacks (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.7.3 of the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed on March 13, 2009).
|
|
10.7.4+
|
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of December
29, 2008 between the Company and Robert N. Sacks (incorporated
by reference to exhibit 10.7.4 of the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed on March 13, 2009).
|
|
10.7.5+
|
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of January 28,
2009 between the Company and Robert N. Sacks (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.7.5 of the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed on March 13, 2009).
|
|
10.8+
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement dated as of
December 1, 2002 between the Company and John Ricchiuto
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.22.2 of the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for December 31,
2002).
|
|
10.8.1+
|
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Executive Employment
Agreement dated as of April 11, 2005, between the Company
and John Ricchiuto (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 of
the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 7,
2005).
|
|
10.9+
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated March 1, 2005,
between the Company and Steven A. Warshauer (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on March 7, 2005).
|
|
10.10+
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement dated as of
May 18, 2006 between the Company and Edward E. Simmons
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 of the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 24, 2006).
|
|
10.11+
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company
and G. Marc Baumann dated as of October 1, 2001 (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.27 to the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed for December 31, 2001).
|
|
10.11.1+
|
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
between the Company and G. Marc Baumann dated as of
December 29, 2008 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.11.1
of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March
13, 2009).
|
|
10.11.2+
|
|
|
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
between the Company and G. Marc Baumann dated as of January 28,
2009 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 of the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 3,
2009).
|
|
10.12+
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement dated as of
March 1, 2005, between the Company and Thomas L. Hagerman
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 of the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 7, 2005).
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10.12.1+
|
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Executive Employment
Agreement dated October 1, 2007 between the Company and Thomas
Hagerman (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed for September
30, 2007).
|
|
10.13+
|
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement dated March 15, 2005 between the
Company and Gerard M. Klaisle.
|
|
10.13.1+
|
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Executive Employment
Agreement dated December 29, 2008 between the Company and Gerard
M. Klaisle.
|
|
10.14+
|
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan dated as of May 1, 2004 (incorporated
by reference to exhibit 10.12 of Amendment No. 1 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No.
333-112652, filed on May 10, 2004).
|
|
10.14.1+
|
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan Amendment effective as of April 22,
2008 (incorporated by reference to Appendix B of the
Companys 2008 Proxy on Form DEF 14A, filed on April 1,
2008).
|
|
10.15+
|
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Stock Option Award Agreement
between the Company and an optionee (incorporated by reference
to exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on November 21, 2005).
|
|
10.15.1+
|
|
|
Form of First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Stock Option
Award Agreement between the Company and an optionee
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 of the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 21, 2005).
|
|
10.16
|
|
|
Consulting Agreement dated as of October 16, 2001 between the
Company and Shoreline Enterprises, LLC (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.36 of the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed for December 31, 2001).
|
|
10.16.1
|
|
|
Amendment to Consulting Agreement dated as of May 10, 2004
between the Company and Shoreline Enterprises, LLC (incorporated
by reference to exhibit 10.14.1 of the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed for December 31, 2004).
|
|
10.17
|
|
|
Agreement of Lease dated as of June 4, 1998 between the Company
and LaSalle National Bank, as successor trustee to LaSalle
National Trust, N.A. as successor trustee to LaSalle National
Bank. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.21 of the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No.
333-112652, filed on February 10, 2004).
|
|
10.17.1
|
|
|
First Amendment to Agreement of Lease dated as of May 1, 1999
between the Company and LaSalle National Bank, as successor
trustee to LaSalle National Trust, N.A. as successor trustee to
LaSalle National Bank (incorporated by reference to exhibit
10.21.1 of the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-1, File No. 333-112652, filed on February 10, 2004).
|
|
10.17.2
|
|
|
Second Amendment to Agreement of Lease dated as of July 27, 2000
between the Company and LaSalle National Bank, as successor
trustee to LaSalle National Trust, N.A. as successor trustee to
LaSalle National Bank (incorporated by reference to exhibit
10.21.2 of the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-1, File No. 333-112652, filed on February 10, 2004).
|
|
10.17.3
|
|
|
Third Amendment to Agreement of Lease dated as of September 11,
2003 between the Company and LaSalle National Bank, as successor
trustee to LaSalle National Trust, N.A. as successor trustee to
LaSalle National Bank (incorporated by reference to exhibit
10.21.3 of the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-1, File No. 333-112652, filed on February 10, 2004).
|
|
10.18
|
|
|
Form of Property Management Agreement (incorporated by reference
to exhibit 10.30 of the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K filed on March 10, 2006).
|
|
10.19
|
|
|
Form of Standard Parking Corporation Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement dated as of July 1, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on July 2, 2008).
|
|
10.19.1
|
|
|
First Amendment to Form of Standard Parking Corporation
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K as
filed on August 6, 2009).
|
|
10.20
|
|
|
Guaranty Agreement of APCOA/Standard Parking, Inc. dated as of
March 2000 to and for the benefit of the State of Connecticut,
Department of Transportation (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.27 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
|
Construction, Financing and Operating Special Facility Lease
Agreement dated as of March 2000 between the State of
Connecticut Department of Transportation and APCOA Bradley
Parking Company, LLC (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.28
of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March
13, 2009).
|
|
10.22
|
|
|
Trust Indenture dated March 1, 2000 between State of Connecticut
and First Union National Bank as Trustee (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.29 of the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed on March 13, 2009).
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
Code of Ethics (incorporated by reference to exhibit 14.1 of the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for December 31,
2002).
|
|
21*
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company.
|
|
23*
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated
as of March 11, 2011.
|
|
31.1*
|
|
|
Section 302 Certification dated March 11, 2011 for James A.
Wilhelm, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer).
|
|
31.2*
|
|
|
Section 302 Certification dated March 11, 2011 for G. Marc
Baumann, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer).
|
|
31.3*
|
|
|
Section 302 Certification dated March 11, 2011 for Daniel R.
Meyer, Senior Vice President Corporate Controller and Assistant
Treasurer (Principal Accounting Officer and Duly Authorized
Officer).
|
|
32*
|
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, dated March 11, 2011.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
+ |
|
Management contract or compensation plan, contract or agreement. |
51
INDEX TO
HISTORICAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Standard Parking Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
52
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Standard Parking
Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Standard Parking Corporation (Company) as of December 31,
2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of
income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010. Our
audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in
the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and
schedule are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Standard Parking Corporation at
December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the consolidated results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our
opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken
as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
Standard Parking Corporations internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on
criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission and our report dated March 11, 2011,
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Chicago, Illinois
March 11, 2011
53
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Standard Parking
Corporation
We have audited Standard Parking Corporations internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010,
based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria).
Standard Parking Corporations management is responsible
for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting included in the
accompanying
Form 10-K.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Standard Parking Corporation maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the COSO
criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Standard Parking Corporation as
of December 31, 2010, and 2009, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity,
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2010, and our report dated March 11, 2011
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Chicago, Illinois
March 11, 2011
54
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for share and per share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
7,305
|
|
|
$
|
8,256
|
|
Notes and accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
52,167
|
|
|
|
44,490
|
|
Prepaid expenses and supplies
|
|
|
2,312
|
|
|
|
5,401
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
2,314
|
|
|
|
3,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
64,098
|
|
|
|
61,604
|
|
Leasehold improvements, equipment and construction in progress,
net
|
|
|
16,839
|
|
|
|
17,445
|
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances and deposits
|
|
|
5,172
|
|
|
|
4,904
|
|
Long-term receivables, net
|
|
|
12,789
|
|
|
|
10,325
|
|
Intangible and other assets, net
|
|
|
8,910
|
|
|
|
8,545
|
|
Cost of contracts, net
|
|
|
15,628
|
|
|
|
11,818
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
132,196
|
|
|
|
128,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,695
|
|
|
|
163,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
255,632
|
|
|
$
|
242,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
43,984
|
|
|
$
|
48,502
|
|
Accrued rent
|
|
|
4,044
|
|
|
|
3,905
|
|
Compensation and payroll withholdings
|
|
|
10,774
|
|
|
|
5,710
|
|
Property, payroll and other taxes
|
|
|
3,025
|
|
|
|
3,038
|
|
Accrued insurance
|
|
|
7,012
|
|
|
|
7,185
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
15,127
|
|
|
|
13,325
|
|
Current portion of obligations under senior credit facility and
other
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
84,639
|
|
|
|
82,327
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
9,637
|
|
|
|
8,151
|
|
Long-term borrowings, excluding current portion:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations under senior credit facility
|
|
|
95,200
|
|
|
|
109,850
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
988
|
|
|
|
1,522
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
1,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,229
|
|
|
|
112,549
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
27,324
|
|
|
|
25,050
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share; 5,000,000 and
10,000 shares authorized as of December 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively; no shares issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.001 per share; 50,000,000 and
21,300,000 shares authorized as of December 31, 2010,
and 2009, respectively; 15,775,645 and 15,385,428 shares
issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2010, and 2009,
respectively
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
97,291
|
|
|
|
91,793
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(60,532
|
)
|
|
|
(77,372
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Standard Parking Corporation Stockholders equity
|
|
|
36,878
|
|
|
|
14,749
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
36,803
|
|
|
|
14,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
255,632
|
|
|
$
|
242,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
55
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for share and per share data)
|
|
|
Parking services revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
$
|
138,664
|
|
|
$
|
140,441
|
|
|
$
|
154,311
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
171,331
|
|
|
|
153,382
|
|
|
|
145,828
|
|
Reimbursed management contract revenue
|
|
|
411,148
|
|
|
|
401,671
|
|
|
|
400,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
721,143
|
|
|
|
695,494
|
|
|
|
700,760
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of parking services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
128,613
|
|
|
|
130,897
|
|
|
|
140,058
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
94,481
|
|
|
|
84,167
|
|
|
|
69,285
|
|
Reimbursed management contract expense
|
|
|
411,148
|
|
|
|
401,671
|
|
|
|
400,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of parking services
|
|
|
634,242
|
|
|
|
616,735
|
|
|
|
609,964
|
|
Gross profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
10,051
|
|
|
|
9,544
|
|
|
|
14,253
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
76,850
|
|
|
|
69,215
|
|
|
|
76,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
|
86,901
|
|
|
|
78,759
|
|
|
|
90,796
|
|
General and administrative expenses(1)
|
|
|
47,878
|
|
|
|
44,707
|
|
|
|
47,619
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6,074
|
|
|
|
5,828
|
|
|
|
6,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
688,194
|
|
|
|
667,270
|
|
|
|
663,642
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
32,949
|
|
|
|
28,224
|
|
|
|
37,118
|
|
Other expenses (income):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
5,335
|
|
|
|
6,012
|
|
|
|
6,476
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,086
|
|
|
|
5,744
|
|
|
|
6,303
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
27,863
|
|
|
|
22,480
|
|
|
|
30,815
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
10,755
|
|
|
|
8,265
|
|
|
|
11,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
17,108
|
|
|
|
14,215
|
|
|
|
19,193
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Standard Parking Corporation
|
|
$
|
16,840
|
|
|
$
|
14,092
|
|
|
$
|
19,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.92
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
1.07
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
15,579,352
|
|
|
|
15,292,412
|
|
|
|
17,325,235
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
15,944,662
|
|
|
|
15,683,525
|
|
|
|
17,731,473
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-cash stock based compensation expense of $2,310, $2,292 and
$1,509 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively, is included in general and administrative
expenses. |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
56
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock(1)
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Par Value
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for share and per share data)
|
|
|
Balance (deficit) at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
18,371,308
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
150,520
|
|
|
$
|
482
|
|
|
|
48,474
|
|
|
$
|
(1,172
|
)
|
|
$
|
(110,509
|
)
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
39,358
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,045
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
19,193
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(490
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(490
|
)
|
Revaluation of interest rate cap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,796
|
|
Repurchase and retirement of common stock
|
|
|
(2,429,993
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(50,033
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48,474
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48,863
|
)
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
627,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,161
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,161
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
152,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
Issuance of stock grants
|
|
|
17,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
Stock-based compensation related to long-term incentive plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation related to restricted stock
units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
991
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
878
|
|
Distribution to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance (deficit) at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
16,110,781
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
103,541
|
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
|
627,423
|
|
|
$
|
(11,161
|
)
|
|
$
|
(91,464
|
)
|
|
$
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
958
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,092
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
14,215
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,443
|
|
Repurchase and retirement of common stock
|
|
|
(843,540
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(15,045
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(627,423
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,885
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
105,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
Issuance of stock grants
|
|
|
12,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
Stock-based compensation related to long-term incentive plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation related to restricted stock
units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,046
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
Distribution to noncontrolliing interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance (deficit) at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
15,385,428
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
91,793
|
|
|
$
|
313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(77,372
|
)
|
|
$
|
(72
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,677
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,840
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
17,108
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
Revaluation of interest rate cap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(379
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(379
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,575
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
385,027
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,773
|
|
Issuance of stock grants
|
|
|
14,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
Retirement of common stock
|
|
|
(9,206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation related to restricted stock
units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,065
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,416
|
|
Distribution to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(271
|
)
|
|
|
(271
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance (deficit) at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
15,775,645
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
97,291
|
|
|
$
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(60,532
|
)
|
|
$
|
(75
|
)
|
|
$
|
36,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
57
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for share and per share data)
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
17,108
|
|
|
$
|
14,215
|
|
|
$
|
19,193
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6,018
|
|
|
|
5,460
|
|
|
|
5,475
|
|
Loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation
|
|
|
2,310
|
|
|
|
2,292
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
Write off of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Provision for losses on accounts receivable
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
Excess tax benefit related to stock option exercises
|
|
|
(1,446
|
)
|
|
|
(535
|
)
|
|
|
(878
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
2,629
|
|
|
|
4,642
|
|
|
|
7,644
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and accounts receivable
|
|
|
(9,672
|
)
|
|
|
(1,860
|
)
|
|
|
(4,831
|
)
|
Prepaid assets
|
|
|
2,710
|
|
|
|
(2,244
|
)
|
|
|
386
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(1,887
|
)
|
|
|
(1,798
|
)
|
|
|
(3,020
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(5,098
|
)
|
|
|
2,028
|
|
|
|
3,505
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
6,009
|
|
|
|
(1,787
|
)
|
|
|
(928
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
19,534
|
|
|
|
21,761
|
|
|
|
29,555
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of leasehold improvements and equipment
|
|
|
(2,985
|
)
|
|
|
(3,486
|
)
|
|
|
(6,303
|
)
|
Proceeds from the sale of assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
(3,597
|
)
|
|
|
(2,450
|
)
|
|
|
(6,318
|
)
|
Cost of contracts purchased
|
|
|
(678
|
)
|
|
|
(934
|
)
|
|
|
(566
|
)
|
Capital interest
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent purchase payments
|
|
|
(340
|
)
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(7,734
|
)
|
|
|
(7,080
|
)
|
|
|
(12,987
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
1,773
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,885
|
)
|
|
|
(60,024
|
)
|
Earn-out payments
|
|
|
(529
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Payments on) proceeds from senior credit facility
|
|
|
(14,650
|
)
|
|
|
(10,750
|
)
|
|
|
46,450
|
|
Payments on long-term borrowings
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
Distribution to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(271
|
)
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
Payments of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(2,352
|
)
|
Payments on capital leases
|
|
|
(531
|
)
|
|
|
(983
|
)
|
|
|
(1,550
|
)
|
Tax benefit related to stock option exercise
|
|
|
1,446
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(12,920
|
)
|
|
|
(14,954
|
)
|
|
|
(16,241
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
(492
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(951
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
8,256
|
|
|
|
8,301
|
|
|
|
8,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
7,305
|
|
|
$
|
8,256
|
|
|
$
|
8,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
5,097
|
|
|
$
|
5,951
|
|
|
$
|
8,686
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
7,270
|
|
|
|
2,938
|
|
|
|
2,564
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
58
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(In thousands except share and per share data)
|
|
Note A.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies
|
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company, its wholly owned subsidiaries, and variable
interest entities in which the Company is the primary
beneficiary. Noncontrolling interest recorded in the
consolidated statement of income is the interest in consolidated
VIEs not controlled by the Company. We have interests in twelve
joint ventures and one limited liability company. The twelve
joint ventures each operate between one and thirty-three parking
facilities. The limited liability company was formed to collect
and distribute parking facility data for a fee. Of the thirteen
variable interest entities, seven are consolidated into our
financial statements, and six are single purpose entities where
the Company is not the primary beneficiary and therefore has a
noncontrolling interest as power is shared. Investments in
variable interest entities where the Company is not the primary
beneficiary are accounted for under the equity method. All
significant intercompany profits, transactions and balances have
been eliminated in consolidation.
Parking
Revenue
The Companys revenues are primarily derived from leased
locations, managed properties and the providing of ancillary
services, such as accounting, equipment leasing, payments
received for exercising termination rights, consulting
development fees, gains on sales of contracts, insurance and
other value-added services. In accordance with the guidance
related to revenue recognition, revenue is recognized when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the fees are fixed
or determinable, collectability is reasonably assured and as
services are provided. The Company recognizes gross receipts
(net of taxes collected from customers) as revenue from leased
locations, and management fees for parking services, as the
related services are provided. Ancillary services are earned
from management contract properties and are recorded as revenue
as those services are provided.
Cost
of Parking Services
The Company recognizes costs for leases and non-reimbursed costs
from managed facilities as cost of parking services. Cost of
parking services consists primarily of rent and payroll related
costs.
Advertising
Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and are included in
general and administrative expenses. Advertising expenses
aggregated $308, $212 and $195 for 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Stock-Based
Compensation
We measure stock-based compensation expense at the grant date,
based on the fair value of the award, and the expense is
recognized over the requisite employee service period (generally
the vesting period) for awards expected to vest (considering
estimated forfeitures).
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents represent funds temporarily invested in money
market instruments with maturities of one to five days. Cash
equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates market value.
59
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts,
represents our estimate of the amount that ultimately will be
realized in cash. Management reviews the adequacy of its
allowance for doubtful accounts on an ongoing basis, using
historical collection trends, aging of receivables, and a review
of specific accounts, and makes adjustments in the allowance as
necessary. Changes in economic conditions or other circumstances
could have an impact on the collection of existing receivable
balances or future allowance considerations. As of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Companys allowance
for doubtful accounts was $2,805 and $3,002, respectively.
Leasehold
Improvements, Equipment, and Construction in Progress,
net
Leasehold improvements and equipment are stated at cost less
accumulated depreciation and amortization. Equipment is
depreciated on the straight-line basis over the estimated useful
lives of approximately 5 years on average. Leasehold
improvements are amortized on the straight-line basis over the
terms of the respective leases or the service lives of the
improvements, whichever is shorter (average of approximately
7 years). Assets under capital leases are amortized on the
straight-line basis over the shorter of the terms of the
respective leases or the service lives of the asset and is
included in depreciation expense.
Costs associated with internal-use software are accounted for in
accordance with guidance related to accounting for the costs of
computer software developed or obtained for internal use.
Cost
of Contracts
Cost of parking contracts are amortized on a straight-line basis
over the weighted average contract life which is 9.5 years
for the year ending December 31, 2010, 9.4 years for
the year ending December 31, 2009 and 10.0 years for
the year ending December 31, 2008. Amortization expense was
$1,907, $1,762 and $1,344 in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Goodwill
We test goodwill for impairment annually and more frequently if
circumstances warrant. We determine fair values for each of the
reporting units using an income approach. For purposes of the
income approach, fair value is determined based on the present
value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at an
appropriate risk-adjusted rate. We use our internal forecasts to
estimate future cash flows and include an estimate of long-term
future growth rates based on our most recent views of the
long-term outlook for each segment. These assumptions could be
adversely impacted by certain of the risks discussed in
Risk Factors in Item 1A. Actual results may
differ from those assumed in our forecasts. We use discount
rates that are commensurate with the risks and uncertainty
inherent in the respective reporting units and in our internally
developed forecasts.
We performed our annual impairment test for goodwill at all of
our reporting units in the fourth quarter.. In performing the
valuations, we used cash flows, which reflected
managements forecasts and discount rates which reflect the
risks associated with the current market. Based on the results
of our testing, the fair values of each of our reporting units
exceeded their book values; therefore, the second step of the
impairment test (in which fair value of each of the reporting
units assets and liabilities is measured) was not required
to be performed and no goodwill impairment was recognized.
Estimating the fair value of reporting units involves the use of
estimates and significant judgments that are based on a number
of factors including actual operating results. If current
conditions change from those expected, it is reasonably possible
that the judgments and estimates described above could change in
future periods.
60
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Long
Lived and Finite-Lived Intangible Assets
Long-lived assets and identifiable intangibles with finite lives
are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may
not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used
is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset
or group of assets to future undiscounted net cash flows
expected to be generated by the asset or group of assets. If
such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment
recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying
amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.
Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the
carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
Debt
Issuance Costs
The costs of obtaining financing are capitalized and amortized
as interest expense over the term of the respective financing
using the interest rate method. Debt issuance costs of $1,558
and $2,165 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, are
included in intangibles and other assets in the consolidated
balance sheets and are reflected net of accumulated
amortization. Amortization expense was $638, $640 and $449 at
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Financial
Instruments
The carrying values of cash, accounts receivable and accounts
payable are reasonable estimates of their fair value due to the
short-term nature of these financial instruments. Long-term debt
has a carrying value that approximates fair value because these
instruments bear interest at market rates.
Foreign
Currency Translation
The functional currency of the Companys foreign operations
is the local currency. Accordingly, assets and liabilities of
the Companys foreign operations are translated from
foreign currencies into U.S. dollars at the rates in effect
on the balance sheet date while income and expenses are
translated at the weighted-average exchange rates for the year.
Adjustments resulting from the translations of foreign currency
financial statements are accumulated and classified as a
separate component of stockholders equity.
Interest
Rate Caps
We do not enter into derivative instruments for any purpose
other than cash flow hedging purposes.
In 2006 we entered into an interest rate cap transaction with
Bank of America, which allowed us to limit our exposure on a
portion of our borrowings under our senior credit facility.
Under the rate cap transaction, we received payments from Bank
of America each quarterly period to the extent that the
prevailing three month LIBOR during that period exceeded our cap
rate of 5.75%. The rate cap transaction capped our LIBOR
interest rate on a notional amount of $50,000 million at
5.75% for a total of 36 months. The rate cap transaction
began as of August 4, 2006 and was settled each quarter on
a date that coincided with our quarterly interest payment dates
under our senior credit facility. This rate cap transaction was
classified as a cash flow hedge, and we calculated the
effectiveness of the hedge on a quarterly basis. The ineffective
portion of the cash flow hedge was recognized in current period
earnings as an increase of interest expense.
Total changes in the fair value of the rate cap transaction for
the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 were immaterial.
The rate cap transaction expired on August 4, 2009.
On February 22, 2010, we entered into interest rate cap
agreements with Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
(Wells Fargo) and Fifth Third Bank (Fifth
Third), allowing us to limit our exposure on a portion of
our borrowings under our senior credit facility (Rate Cap
Transactions). Pursuant to two separate letter agreements
between the Company and Wells Fargo and Fifth Third,
respectively, we will receive payments
61
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
from Wells Fargo and Fifth Third each quarterly period to the
extent that the prevailing three month LIBOR during that period
exceeds our cap rate of 3.25%. The Rate Cap Transactions are
effective March 31, 2010, and will settle each quarter on a
date that is intended to coincide with our quarterly interest
payment dates under our senior credit facility. The Rate Cap
Transactions cap our LIBOR interest rate on a notional amount of
$50,000 at 3.25% for a total of 39 months. These Rate Cap
Transactions are classified as a cash flow hedge, and we
calculate the effectiveness of the hedge on a quarterly basis.
The ineffective portion of the cash flow hedge is recognized in
current period earnings as an increase of interest expense. The
fair value of the interest rate cap at December 31, 2010 is
$174 and is included in prepaid expenses.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Insurance
Reserves
The Company purchases comprehensive casualty insurance covering
certain claims that arise in connection with our operations. In
addition, the Company purchases umbrella/excess liability
coverage. The Companys various liability insurance
policies have deductibles of up to $250 that must be met before
the insurance companies are required to reimburse the Company
for costs incurred relating to covered claims. As a result, the
Company is, in effect, self-insured for all claims up to the
deductible levels. The Company applies the provisions as defined
in the guidance related to accounting for contingencies, in
determining the timing and amount of expense recognition
associated with claims against the Company. The expense
recognition is based upon the Companys determination of an
unfavorable outcome of a claim being deemed as probable and
capable of being reasonably estimated, as defined in the
guidance related to accounting for contingencies. This
determination requires the use of judgment in both the
estimation of probability and the amount to be recognized as an
expense. The Company utilizes historical claims experience along
with regular input from third party insurance advisors in
determining the required level of insurance reserves. Future
information regarding historical loss experience may require
changes to the level of insurance reserves and could result in
increased expense recognition in the future.
Contingencies
The Company is subject to litigation in the normal course of our
business. The Company applies the provisions as defined in the
guidance related to accounting for contingencies in determining
the recognition and measurement of expense recognition
associated with legal claims against the Company. Management
uses guidance from internal and external legal counsel on the
potential outcome of litigation in determining the need to
record liabilities for potential losses and the disclosure of
pending legal claims.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting
Standards Not Yet Adopted
In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued updated accounting guidance related to
the disclosure of supplementary pro forma information for
business combinations to specify that if a company presents
comparative financial statements, it should disclose revenue and
earnings of the combined entity as though the business
combination that occurred during the current period, occurred at
the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period.
This guidance is effective prospectively for business
combinations for which the acquisition date in, on or after the
beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The
Company does not expect the provisions of this update to have a
material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
62
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In December 2010, the FASB issued updated accounting guidance to
modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test; requiring
companies with reporting units with zero or negative carrying
amounts to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment analysis if
it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists.
This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. This
guidance is not expected to impact the Company.
Accounting
Standards Adopted
In June 2009, the FASB updated the accounting standards related
to the consolidation of variable interest entities. This new
guidance requires a qualitative approach to identifying a
controlling financial interest in a VIE, and requires an ongoing
assessment of whether an entity is a VIE and whether an interest
in a VIE makes the holder the primary beneficiary of the VIE.
The updated accounting guidance is effective for annual
reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009. The
Companys adoption of this updated accounting guidance on
January 1, 2010 did not impact the financial condition or
results of operations of the Company.
In January 2010, the FASB issued a new accounting standard which
requires new disclosures and clarifies certain existing
disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. The
majority of the provisions of this update are effective for
interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not
have a material impact on the Companys financial
statements.
Reclassification
Certain amounts previously presented in the financial statements
of prior periods have been reclassified to conform to current
year presentation.
|
|
Note B.
|
Common
and Preferred Stock
|
On April 28, 2010, our stockholders approved the charter
amendment increasing the Companys number of shares of
common stock authorized for issuance under the certificate of
incorporation by 28,700,000 shares, and increasing the
number of shares of preferred stock from ten to 5,000,000. The
amount of total authorized capital stock following the amendment
is 55,000,000 shares, which includes 50,000,000 shares
of common stock with a $0.001 par value and
5,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a $0.01 par
value. The amendment was filed with the State of Delaware on
April 29, 2010.
|
|
Note C.
|
Net
Income Per Common Share
|
Companies are required to present basic and diluted earnings per
share. Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net
income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is
based upon the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding for the period plus dilutive potential common
shares, including stock options and restricted stock units using
the treasury-stock method.
63
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A reconciliation of the weighted average basic shares
outstanding to the weighted average diluted shares outstanding
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands except for share and per share data)
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Standard Parking Corporation
|
|
$
|
16,840
|
|
|
$
|
14,092
|
|
|
$
|
19,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
15,579,352
|
|
|
|
15,292,412
|
|
|
|
17,325,235
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted stock units
|
|
|
365,310
|
|
|
|
391,113
|
|
|
|
406,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
15,944,662
|
|
|
|
15,683,525
|
|
|
|
17,731,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.92
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
1.07
|
|
There were no anti-dilutive options excluded in the computation
of diluted earning per share for the year ended
December 31, 2010. There were 19,068 anti-dilutive options
excluded in the computation of diluted earnings per share for
the year ended December 31, 2009 because the options
exercise prices were greater than the average market price of
the common stock. There were no anti-dilutive options for the
year ended December 31, 2008.
For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, 9,205 and
18,777 shares, respectively, of performance based
restricted stock were not included in the computation of
weighted average diluted common share amounts because the number
of shares ultimately issuable is contingent on the
Companys performance goals, which were not achieved as of
those dates. The plan was completed as of December 31,
2009, and during the second quarter of 2010, all non-awarded
shares were returned to the pool of generally available shares
available for future use under the Long-Term Incentive Plan.
There are no additional securities that could dilute basic EPS
in the future that were not included in the computation of
diluted EPS, other than those disclosed.
|
|
Note D.
|
Leasehold
Improvements, Equipment and Construction in Progress,
net
|
A summary of leasehold improvements, equipment, and construction
in progress and related accumulated depreciation and
amortization is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
Ranges of Estimated Useful Life
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Equipment
|
|
2-10 years
|
|
$
|
30,982
|
|
|
$
|
28,838
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
Shorter of lease term or economic
|
|
|
9,642
|
|
|
|
9,708
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
life up to 10 years
|
|
|
6,025
|
|
|
|
7,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,649
|
|
|
|
46,089
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
(29,810
|
)
|
|
|
(28,644
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements, equipment and construction in progress,
net
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,839
|
|
|
$
|
17,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Depreciation expense was $3,722, $3,832 and $4,403 in 2010, 2009
and 2008, respectively. Depreciation includes losses on
abandonments of leasehold improvements and equipment of $53,
$369 and $584 in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
|
Note E.
|
Cost of
Contracts, net
|
Cost of contracts represents the contractual rights associated
with providing parking services at a managed or leased facility.
Cost consists of either capitalized payments made to third
parties or the value ascribed to contracts acquired through
acquisition. Cost of contracts are amortized over the estimated
life of the contracts, including anticipated renewals and
terminations.
The balance of cost of contracts is comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cost of contracts
|
|
$
|
23,273
|
|
|
$
|
17,824
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(7,645
|
)
|
|
|
(6,006
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of contracts, net
|
|
$
|
15,628
|
|
|
$
|
11,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected future amortization of cost of contracts is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Contract
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
2,160
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2,044
|
|
2014
|
|
|
1,911
|
|
2015
|
|
|
1,740
|
|
2016 and Thereafter
|
|
|
5,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
15,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense related to cost of contracts was $1,907,
$1,762 and $1,344 for the years ended December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008 respectively. Amortization includes losses on cost
of contracts of $62, $0, and $0 in 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The weighted average useful life is 9.5 years
for 2010, 9.4 years for 2009 and 10.0 years for 2008.
2010
Acquisitions
On December 8, 2010, the Company acquired Expert Parking,
Inc. and Expert Parking Management, Inc. in a stock purchase
transaction for a purchase price in the amount of $5,977, of
which $3,597 was paid in cash, net of cash acquired, and $2,380
of estimated earn-out payments to be paid over five years, which
are contingent upon achieving certain financial performance
targets. Expert Parking, based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
operates and manages garages in Pennyslvania and New Jersey.
The net cash paid at the time of the acquisition of $3,597
consisted of accounts receivable of $569, intangible assets with
finite lives of $3,150 and goodwill of $3,489, offset by
accounts payable of $580, accrued expenses of $757 and long term
liabilities of $2,274.
The acquisition represents an acquisition of a business and was
accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The
purchase price allocation is based on preliminary estimates.
These estimates are subject to revision after the Company
completes its fair value analysis. The Company financed the
acquisition through
65
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
additional term borrowings under the senior credit facility and
existing cash. The results of operations of this acquisition is
included in the Companys consolidated statement of income
from the date of acquisition. This acquisition is not considered
material to the Company.
The Company expensed acquisition related costs of $207 in 2010.
These costs are included in general and administrative expenses
in the income statement. The amount of goodwill that is expected
to be deductible for tax purposes is $1,396.
2009
Acquisitions
On July 1, 2009, the Company acquired substantially all of
the assets of Gameday Management Group U.S. for a purchase
price in the amount of $7,590, of which $2,450 was paid in cash,
net of a hold back of $50, and $5,090 of potential earn-out
payments of which $529 have been paid as of December 31,
2010. Gameday Management, based in Orlando, Florida, plans and
operates transportation and parking systems for major stadiums
and sporting events. Among the assets acquired is Gamedays
Click and Park online parking and traffic management system,
which enables customers to purchase reserved parking online in
advance of an event. The acquisition represents an acquisition
of a business and was accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting. This acquisition is not considered material to the
Company.
The purchase price allocation in intangible assets with finite
lives is $3,830 and goodwill is $3,760. The Company engaged a
third-party valuation firm to assist in determining the fair
value analysis of certain assets acquired and the contingent
consideration. The Company financed the acquisition through
additional term borrowings under the senior credit facility and
existing cash. The results of operations of this acquisition are
included in the Companys consolidated statement of income
from the date of acquisition.
The Company expensed acquisition related costs of $23 in 2010
and $178 in 2009. These costs are included in general and
administrative expenses in the income statement. The amount of
goodwill that is expected to be deductible for tax purposes is
$1,504.
After the December 31, 2009 financial statements were
issued, we received the final valuation report from a
third-party valuation firm. After considering the results of
that valuation report, we have determined the value of certain
assets and obligations acquired as part of the acquisition with
Gameday Management to be $3,830 and $5,090, respectively. The
acquired carrying amount of certain assets was retrospectively
increased by $989 as of July 1, 2010, due to this new
information, with a corresponding decrease to goodwill. The
carrying amount of the contingent consideration was
retrospectively increased by $2,249, due to this new
information, with a corresponding increase to goodwill. The
amortization expense for the retroactive adjustment to certain
assets was determined to be immaterial and was not retroactively
recorded for the year ended December 31, 2009.
|
|
Note G.
|
Fair
Value Measurement
|
The Company applies the accounting standards for fair value
measurements and disclosures for its financial assets and
financial liabilities. The guidance requires disclosures about
assets and liabilities measured at fair value. The
Companys financial assets relate to the interest rate cap
of $174 and the Companys financial liabilities relate to
contingent acquisition consideration payments of $6,807.
The accounting guidance for fair value measurements and
disclosures includes a fair value hierarchy that is intended to
increase consistency and comparability in fair value
measurements and related disclosures. The fair value hierarchy
is based on observable or unobservable inputs to valuation
techniques that are used to measure fair value. Observable
inputs reflect assumptions market participants would use in
pricing an asset or liability based on market data obtained from
independent sources while unobservable inputs reflect a
reporting
66
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
entitys pricing based upon its own market assumptions. The
fair value hierarchy consists of the following three levels:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1: Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Inputs are quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in an active market, quoted prices for identical or
similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active,
and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable and
market-corroborated inputs, which are derived principally from
or corroborated by observable market data.
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Inputs that are derived from valuation techniques
in which one or more significant inputs or value drivers are
unobservable.
|
The significant inputs used to derive the fair value of the
contingent acquisition consideration include financial forecasts
of future operating results, the probability of reaching the
forecast and the associated discount rate. The weighted average
probability of the contingent acquisition consideration ranges
from 63% to 125%, with a weighted average discount rate of 13%.
The following table sets forth the Companys financial
assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis and the basis of measurement at December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measurement
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Cap
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent acquisition consideration
|
|
$
|
(6,807
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(6,807
|
)
|
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning
and ending balances for the liabilities measured at fair value
using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to Seller
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
(5,090
|
)
|
Increase related to new acquisitions
|
|
|
(2,400
|
)
|
Payment of contingent consideration
|
|
|
529
|
|
Change in fair value
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
(6,807
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded
adjustments to the original contingent consideration obligation
recorded upon the acquisition of Gameday Management Group
U.S. The adjustments were the result of using revised
forecasts and updated fair value measurements that adjusted the
Companys potential earn-out payments related to the
purchase of this business.
For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company
recognized a benefit of $154 in general and administrative
expenses in the statement of income due to the change in fair
value measurements using a level three valuation technique.
67
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note H.
|
Borrowing
Arrangements
|
Long-term borrowings, in order of preference, consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Due Date
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Senior credit facility
|
|
June 2013
|
|
$
|
95,200
|
|
|
$
|
109,850
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
Various
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
2,056
|
|
Obligations on Seller notes and other
|
|
Various
|
|
|
1,177
|
|
|
|
1,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,902
|
|
|
|
113,211
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
97,229
|
|
|
$
|
112,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
Credit Facility
On July 15, 2008, we amended and restated our credit
facility.
The $210,000 revolving senior credit facility will expire on
June 29, 2013. The revolving senior credit facility
includes a letter of credit
sub-facility
with a sublimit of $50,000. The $50,000 letter of credit
sub-facility
does not limit the maximum actual borrowings on the revolving
senior credit facility.
This revolving senior credit facility bears interest, at our
option, at either (1) LIBOR plus an applicable LIBOR margin
of between 2.00% and 3.50% depending on the ratio of our total
funded indebtedness to our EBITDA from time to time (Total
Debt Ratio) or (2) the Base Rate (as defined below)
plus an applicable Base Rate Margin of between 0.50% and 2.00%
depending on our Total Debt Ratio. We may elect interest periods
of one, two, three or six months for LIBOR based borrowings. The
Base Rate is the greater of (i) the rate publicly announced
from time to time by Bank of America, N.A. as its prime
rate, or (ii) the overnight federal funds rate plus
0.50%.
Certain financial covenants limit the Companys capacity to
fully draw on its $210,000 million revolving credit
facility. Our senior credit facility includes a fixed charge
ratio covenant, a total debt to EBITDA ratio covenant, a limit
on our ability to incur additional indebtedness, issue preferred
stock or pay dividends, and certain other restrictions on our
activities. We are required to repay borrowings under our senior
credit facility out of the proceeds of future issuances of debt
or equity securities and asset sales, subject to certain
customary exceptions. Our senior credit facility is secured by
substantially all of our assets and all assets acquired in the
future (including a pledge of 100% of the stock of our existing
and future domestic guarantor subsidiaries and 65% of the stock
of our existing and future foreign subsidiaries).
We are in compliance with all of our financial covenants as of
December 31, 2010.
The weighted average interest rate on our senior credit facility
at December 31, 2010 and 2009 was 2.6% and 3.2%,
respectively. The rate includes all outstanding LIBOR contracts,
interest rate cap effect and letters of credit. The weighted
average interest rate on outstanding borrowings, not including
letters of credit, was 2.6% and 3.3% at December 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively.
At December 31, 2010, we had $16,773 of letters of credit
outstanding under the senior credit facility, borrowings against
the senior credit facility aggregated $95,200, and we had
$45,183 available under the senior credit facility.
We have entered into various financing agreements, which were
used for the purchase of equipment.
68
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note I.
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of
tax, for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Revaluation of interest rate cap
|
|
$
|
(379
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
103
|
|
|
$
|
313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of income tax expense (benefit) for the years
ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Current provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal
|
|
$
|
5,958
|
|
|
$
|
2,778
|
|
|
$
|
2,797
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
State
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
|
|
|
7,878
|
|
|
|
3,763
|
|
|
|
3,894
|
|
Deferred provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
4,133
|
|
|
|
6,961
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred
|
|
|
2,877
|
|
|
|
4,502
|
|
|
|
7,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$
|
10,755
|
|
|
$
|
8,265
|
|
|
$
|
11,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes reflect the net effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amount used
for income tax purposes. Significant
69
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
components of the Companys deferred tax assets and
liabilities as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carry forwards
|
|
$
|
4,947
|
|
|
$
|
6,395
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
9,079
|
|
|
|
7,506
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
5,371
|
|
|
|
4,339
|
|
Accrued lease obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Other
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
19,650
|
|
|
|
18,277
|
|
Less: valuation allowance
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax asset
|
|
|
19,332
|
|
|
|
17,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(253
|
)
|
|
|
(908
|
)
|
Undistributed foreign earnings
|
|
|
(1,100
|
)
|
|
|
(1,008
|
)
|
Tax over book depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(1,849
|
)
|
|
|
601
|
|
Tax over book goodwill amortization
|
|
|
(23,357
|
)
|
|
|
(21,287
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(26,656
|
)
|
|
|
(22,602
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
$
|
(7,324
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,694
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized on the balance sheet consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset, current
|
|
$
|
2,313
|
|
|
$
|
3,457
|
|
Deferred tax (liability), long term
|
|
|
(9,637
|
)
|
|
|
(8,151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
$
|
(7,324
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,694
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accounting guidance for accounting for income taxes requires
that we assess the realizability of deferred tax assets at each
reporting period. These assessments generally consider several
factors including the reversal of existing temporary
differences, projected future taxable income, and potential tax
planning strategies. We have valuation allowances totaling $318
and $369 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively,
related to our state net operating loss carryforwards
(NOLs) that we believe are not likely to be realized based
upon our estimates of future state taxable income limitations of
the use of our state NOLs, and the carryforward life over
which the state tax benefit will be realized.
At December 31, 2010, the Company had $12,060 of gross
federal net operating loss (NOLs) carryforwards, which will
expire in the years 2023 through 2024, and $726 of tax effected
state net operating loss (NOLs) carryforwards which will expire
2011 through 2026. As a result of the initial public offering
completed in June of 2004, an ownership change occurred under
Internal Revenue Code Section 382 which limits our ability
to use pre-change NOLs to reduce future taxable income.
Additionally, a second ownership change occurred in May 2009,
however, since the fair market value of the Companys
shares were significantly higher than at the time of the initial
public offering, there was no change in the applicable
Section 382 limitation that limits our ability to utilize
pre-change NOLs.
70
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Since 2005, the Company has treated its investment in its
Canadian subsidiary as non-permanent in duration and provided
taxes on the undistributed Canadian earnings under the
applicable accounting guidance. In 2010 the Company reassessed
the treatment of the undistributed earnings of its Canadian
subsidiary and determined that approximately $1,600 of Canadian
earnings are permanently reinvested to meet the Canadian
subsidiarys working capital requirements. The Company has
provided taxes for the remaining undistributed earnings of its
Canadian subsidiary in excess of the permanently reinvested
amount.
A reconciliation of the Companys reported income tax
provision (benefit) to the amount computed by multiplying book
income/(loss) before income taxes by the statutory United States
federal income tax rate for the years ended December 31,
2010, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Tax at statutory rate
|
|
$
|
9,752
|
|
|
$
|
7,868
|
|
|
$
|
10,733
|
|
Permanent differences
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
State taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
1,314
|
|
|
|
933
|
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
Effect of foreign tax rates
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Recognition of tax credits
|
|
|
(526
|
)
|
|
|
(929
|
)
|
|
|
(844
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,806
|
|
|
|
8,352
|
|
|
|
11,774
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$
|
10,755
|
|
|
$
|
8,265
|
|
|
$
|
11,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid in aggregate to United States federal, state
and Canadian tax authorities was $7,270, $2,938 and $2,564 in
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company has not identified any
uncertain tax positions that would have a material impact on the
Companys financial position. The Company recognizes
potential interest and penalties related to uncertain tax
positions, if any, in income tax expense.
The tax years that remain subject to examination for the
Companys major tax jurisdictions at December 31, 2010
are shown below:
|
|
|
2004 2009
|
|
United States federal income tax
|
2004 2009
|
|
United States state and local income tax
|
2006 2009
|
|
Canada
|
The Company offers deferred compensation arrangements for
certain key executives and sponsors an employees savings
and retirement plan in which certain employees are eligible to
participate. Subject to their continued employment by the
Company, certain employees offered supplemental pension
arrangements will receive a defined monthly benefit upon
attaining age 65. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the
Company has accrued $3,154 and $3,146, respectively,
representing the present value of the future benefit payments.
Expenses related to these plans amounted to $154, $217, and $154
in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Participants in the savings and retirement plan may elect to
contribute a portion of their compensation to the plan. The
Company, contributes an amount in cash or other property as
required by the plan. Expenses related to these plans amounted
to $951, $897, and $904 in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The Company also offers a non-qualified deferred compensation
plan. This plan allows certain employees to defer a portion of
their compensation, limited to a maximum of $50 per year, to be
paid to the participants
71
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
upon separation of employment or distribution date selected by
employee. To support the non-qualified deferred compensation
plan, the Company has elected to purchase Company owned life
insurance (COLI) policies on certain plan
participants. The cash surrender value of the COLI policies is
designed to provide a source for funding the accrued liability.
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the cash surrender value
of the COLI policies is $2,830 and $1,757, respectively and is
included in intangible and other assets, net on the consolidated
balance sheet. The liability for the non-qualified deferred
compensation plan is included in other long-term liabilities and
was $2,960 and $1,690 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
The Company also contributes to three multi-employer defined
contribution and eight multi-employer defined benefit plans
which cover certain union employees. Expenses related to these
plans were $552, $572 and $575 in 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
|
|
Note L.
|
Leases
and Contingencies
|
The Company operates parking facilities under operating leases
expiring on various dates, generally prior to 2019. Certain of
the leases contain options to renew at the Companys
discretion.
Total future annual rent expense is not determinable as a
portion of such future rent is contingent based on revenues. At
December 31, 2010, the Companys minimum rental
commitments, excluding contingent rent provisions under all
non-cancelable operating leases, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2011(1)
|
|
$
|
35,147
|
|
2012
|
|
|
23,590
|
|
2013
|
|
|
15,949
|
|
2014
|
|
|
7,913
|
|
2015
|
|
|
4,964
|
|
2016 and thereafter,
|
|
|
12,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
99,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
$9,445 is included in 2011s minimum commitments for leases
that expire in less than one year. |
Rent expense, including contingent rents, was $101,623, $101,634
and $110,134 in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Contingent rent expense was $53,211, $53,513 and $70,976 in
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Contingent rent expense
consists primarily of percentage rent payments, which will cease
at various times as certain leases expire.
We enter into contingent purchase price arrangements from time
to time for our business combinations and depending upon the
date of the business combination, some of our contingent
purchase price arrangements are not reflected in our
consolidated balance sheet as those acquisitions occurred prior
to the adoption of the most recent guidance on business
combinations which now requires these to be recorded on the date
of the acquisition. Our contingent payment obligations
outstanding under previous business comibation rules totaled
$908, as of December 31, 2010, assuming all performance
targets would be achieved as of December 31, 2010, and on
an aggregate undiscounted basis. Such contingent payments will
be accounted for as additional purchase price if the performance
criteria is achieved; accordingly, this contingent payment
obligation is not recorded at December 31, 2010. We have
recorded a contingency obligation for acquisitions subsequent to
the adoption of the most recent guidance on business
combinations, in the amount of $6,807, of which $5,636 is
included in the other long-term liabilities and $1,171 is
included in accrued expenses at December 31, 2010.
72
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note M.
|
Management
Contracts and Related Arrangements with Affiliates
|
We entered into a consulting agreement with D&E Parking
that became effective on May 1, 2007. Edward Simmons, an
executive officer of Standard Parking, has an ownership interest
in D&E. This consulting agreement was terminated on
April 30, 2009. Per the terms of the agreement,
consideration for services provided was $250 per year. In
addition, the consultant was eligible for a consultant fee of up
to $50 per year. In consideration of the services provided by
D&E under this arrangement, we paid D&E $128 in 2009.
On December 31, 2000, we sold, at fair market value,
certain contract rights to D&E. In July 2007, we bought
back certain contract rights, representing five locations. The
Company continued to operate an additional location through
January 2008, at which time the location was sold to an
unrelated third party. We received net management fees and
reimbursement for support services in connection with the
operation of the parking facilities from D&E. We recorded
net management fees from D&E of $4 in 2008.
In 2010, 2009 and 2008, Standard Parking provided property
management services for twenty separate retail shopping centers
and commercial office buildings in which D&E has an
ownership interest. In consideration of the property management
services we provided for these twenty properties, we recorded
net management fees totaling $634, $689 and $632 in 2010, 2009
and 2008, respectively.
In 2010 and 2009, our wholly owned subsidiary, SP Plus Security,
Inc., formerly known as Preferred Response Security Services,
Inc., provided security services for two retail shopping centers
owned by D&E and one retail shopping center in 2008. We
recorded net management fees amounting to $30 for these security
services in 2010, $30 in 2009 and $34 in 2008. We provided
sweeping and power washing for one retail shopping facility in
which D&E has ownership interest in 2010 and two retail
shopping facilities in which D&E has ownership in 2009 and
2008. For these services we recorded net management fees
totaling $1 in 2010, $1 in 2009 and $9 in 2008.
On June 2, 2004, we entered into a registration rights
agreement with Steamboat Industries LLC, our former parent
company and an affiliate of Mr. Holten
(Steamboat). Pursuant to the registration rights
agreement, Steamboat exercised its demand registration rights in
April 2009. No registration statement was filed pursuant to the
demand made by Steamboat.
On May 15, 2009, Steamboat transferred all of its rights
under the registration rights agreement to GSO Special
Situations Fund LP, GSO Special Situations Overseas Master
Fund Ltd., GSO Special Situations Overseas Benefit Plan
Fund Ltd., GSO Capital Opportunities Fund LP, and CML
VII, LLC. (collectively, the Significant
Stockholders) together with substantially all of its
Standard Parking common stock, and the Significant Stockholders
agreed in writing to be bound by the terms of this agreement.
Timothy J. White, one of our directors, is a Senior Managing
Director and Co-Head of Mezzanine Investing and Head of Private
Equity Investing for GSO Capital Partners LP, an affiliate of
the GSO funds that are Significant Stockholders. Pursuant to the
registration rights agreement, the Significant Stockholders
exercised their demand registration rights before such rights
terminated on May 27, 2009, and a shelf registration
statement on
Form S-3
was filed pursuant to the Significant Stockholders demand
notice to register all of the 7,581,842 shares of Standard
Parking common stock that they held. On November 9, 2009,
our Company and the Significant Stockholders entered into
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Rights Agreement to cause
the registration statement to remain effective for a period of
two years from the date that it became effective, which was
October 6, 2009. Accordingly, we were required to cause the
registration statement to remain effective until October 6,
2011 or until all 7,581,842 registered shares have been
distributed, whichever occurs first. The registration rights
terminated because these shares of common stock were sold in a
public offering
and/or the
Significant Stockholders shares all became eligible for
sale under Rule 144.
On November 9, 2009, we entered into an underwriting
agreement with the Significant Stockholders and Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC and William Blair & Company,
L.L.C., as representatives for the several underwriters,
relating to the public offering of up to 6,592,906 shares
of our common stock by the Significant
73
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stockholders. The Significant Stockholders also granted the
underwriters a
30-day
option to purchase an additional 988,936 shares of our
common stock to cover over-allotments, if any. The underwriting
agreement included customary representations, warranties and
covenants by us and the Significant Stockholders. It also
provided for customary indemnification by each of our Company,
the Significant Stockholders and the underwriters against
certain liabilities and customary contribution provisions in
respect of those liabilities. Of the 7,581,842 registered
shares, the Significant Stockholders sold 6,819,692 shares
pursuant to the registration statement in 2009. An additional
580,032 shares were sold by certain significant
stockholders pursuant to the registration statement in 2010. We
did not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the
Significant Stockholders. In 2009, we incurred $1,700 of legal,
accounting, registration and related expenses in connection with
Steamboats and the Significant Stockholders
registration demand, the related underwriting agreements, and
costs and expenses associated with the loss of control by our
former parent, Steamboat.
|
|
Note N.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
We are subject to litigation in the normal course of our
business. The outcomes of legal proceedings and claims brought
against us and other loss contingencies are subject to
significant uncertainty. We accrue a charge against income when
our management determines that it is probable that an asset has
been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount of
loss can be reasonably estimated. In addition, we accrue for the
authoritative judgments or assertions made against us by
government agencies at the time of their rendering regardless of
our intent to appeal. In determining the appropriate accounting
for loss contingencies, we consider the likelihood of loss or
impairment of an asset or the incurrence of a liability, as well
as our ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss. We
regularly evaluate current information available to us to
determine whether an accrual should be established or adjusted.
Estimating the probability that a loss will occur and estimating
the amount of a loss or a range of loss involves significant
judgment.
Property under capital leases included within equipment is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Service vehicles
|
|
$
|
3,739
|
|
|
$
|
4,043
|
|
Parking equipment
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,803
|
|
|
|
4,107
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(2,473
|
)
|
|
|
(2,120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,330
|
|
|
$
|
1,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense was $561, $844 and $1,432 in 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively, which is included in depreciation expense.
74
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Future minimum lease payments under capital leases at
December 31, 2010 as well as the present value of the
minimum lease payments through expiration are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
573
|
|
2012
|
|
|
648
|
|
2013
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum payments
|
|
|
1,624
|
|
Less: Amounts representing interest
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of minimum payments
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term portion
|
|
$
|
988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note P.
|
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
|
Goodwill is assigned to respective segments based upon the
specific Region where the assets acquired and associated
goodwill resided.
The following table reflects the changes in the carrying amounts
of goodwill by reported segment for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region
|
|
|
Region
|
|
|
Region
|
|
|
Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One
|
|
|
Two
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
Four
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
61,693
|
|
|
$
|
4,061
|
|
|
$
|
35,219
|
|
|
$
|
22,577
|
|
|
$
|
123,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,760
|
|
Adjustments to purchase price
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
Contingency payments related to acquisitions
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
61,849
|
|
|
$
|
8,460
|
|
|
$
|
35,227
|
|
|
$
|
22,577
|
|
|
$
|
128,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired during the period
|
|
|
3,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,489
|
|
Contingency payments related to acquisitions
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
65,664
|
|
|
$
|
8,714
|
|
|
$
|
35,241
|
|
|
$
|
22,577
|
|
|
$
|
132,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note Q.
|
Long-Term
Receivables, net
|
Long-term receivables, net, consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Outstanding
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Bradley International Airport
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficiency payments
|
|
$
|
12,070
|
|
|
$
|
9,606
|
|
Other Bradley related, net
|
|
|
3,203
|
|
|
|
3,203
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,484
|
)
|
|
|
(2,484
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term receivables, net
|
|
$
|
12,789
|
|
|
$
|
10,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Agreement
We are entered into a
25-year
agreement with the State of Connecticut (State) that
expires on April 6, 2025, under which we operate the
surface parking and 3,500 garage parking spaces at Bradley
International Airport located in the Hartford, Connecticut
metropolitan area. The Company manages the facility for which it
is expected to receive a management fee.
The parking garage was financed on April 6, 2000 through
the issuance of $53,800 of State of Connecticut special facility
revenue bonds, representing $47,700 non-taxable Series A
bonds and a separate taxable issuance of $6,100 Series B
bonds. The Series B bonds were retired on July 1, 2006
according to the terms of the indenture. The Bradley agreement
provides that we deposit with a trustee for the bondholders all
gross revenues collected from operations of the surface and
garage parking, and from these gross revenues the trustee pays
debt service on the special facility revenue bonds outstanding,
operating and capital maintenance expense of the surface and
garage parking facilities excluding our management fee discussed
below, and specific annual guaranteed minimum payments to the
state. Principal and interest on the Bradley special facility
revenue bonds increase from approximately $3,600 in lease year
2002 to approximately $4,500 in lease year 2025. Annual
guaranteed minimum payments to the State increase from
approximately $8,300 in lease year 2002 to approximately $13,200
in lease year 2024. The annual minimum guaranteed payment to the
State by the trustee for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $9,935 and $9,731,
respectively.
All of the cash flow from the parking facilities are pledged to
the security of the special facility revenue bonds and are
collected and deposited with the bond trustee. Each month the
bond trustee makes certain required monthly distributions, which
are characterized as Guaranteed Payments. To the
extent the monthly gross receipts generated by the parking
facilities are not sufficient for the trustee to make the
required Guaranteed Payments, we are obligated to deliver the
deficiency amount to the trustee. Additionally, the Guaranteed
Payments are required to be paid before we are reimbursed for
deficiency payments or management fees.
The following is the list of Guaranteed Payments:
|
|
|
|
|
Garage and surface operating expenses,
|
|
|
|
Principal and interest on the special facility revenue bonds,
|
|
|
|
Trustee expenses,
|
|
|
|
Major maintenance and capital improvement deposits; and
|
|
|
|
State minimum guarantee.
|
However, to the extent there is a cash surplus in any month
during the term of the Lease, we have the right to be repaid the
principal amount of any and all deficiency payments, together
with actual interest expenses and a premium, not to exceed 10%
of the initial deficiency payment. We calculate and record
interest income and premium income in the period the associated
deficiency payment is received from the trustee.
Deficiency
Payments
To the extent that monthly gross receipts are not sufficient for
the trustee to make the required payments, we are obligated
pursuant to our agreement, to deliver the deficiency amount to
the trustee within three business days of being notified. We are
responsible for these deficiency payments regardless of the
amount of utilization for the Bradley parking facilities. The
deficiency payments represent contingent interest bearing
advances to the trustee to cover operating cash flow
requirements. To the extent sufficient funds are available in
the appropriate fund, the trustee is then directed by the State
to reimburse us for deficiency payments up to the amount of the
calculated surplus.
76
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In the year ended December 21, 2010, we made deficiency
payments (net of repayments received) of $2,464. In addition, in
2010 we received $31 for premium income on deficiency payments
to the trustee. We did not record or receive any interest on
deficiency repayments from the trustee in the year ended
December 31, 2010. In the year ended December 31,
2009, we made deficiency payments (net of repayments received)
of $3,645 and we did not record or receive any interest or
premium income on deficiency repayments from the trustee. The
receivable from the trustee for interest and premium income
related to deficiency repayments was $0 as of December 31,
2010 and 2009.
The payments, if any, are recorded as a receivable by us for
which we are reimbursed from time to time as provided in the
trust agreement. As of December 31, 2010, and
December 31, 2009, we have a receivable of $12,070 and
$9,606, respectively, compromised of cumulative deficiency
payments to the trustee, net of reimbursements. We believe these
advances to be fully recoverable, as the Construction, Financing
and Operating Special Facility Lease Agreement, which governs
reimbursement of Guarantor Payments places no time restriction
on the companys right to reimbursement, and therefore have
not recorded a valuation allowance for them. We do not guarantee
the payment of any principal or interest on any debt obligations
of the State of Connecticut or the trustee.
Per the Construction, Financing and Operating Special Facility
Lease Agreement, which governs reimbursement of deficiency
payments, places no time restriction or language exists limiting
our right to reimbursement in the Lease.
The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balance
of the receivable for each year presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Deficiency payments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
9,606
|
|
|
$
|
5,961
|
|
Deficiency payments made
|
|
|
2,724
|
|
|
|
3,645
|
|
Deficiency repayment received
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
|
12,070
|
|
|
|
9,606
|
|
Other Bradley related
|
|
|
3,203
|
|
|
|
3,203
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,484
|
)
|
|
|
(2,484
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term receivables
|
|
$
|
12,789
|
|
|
$
|
10,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
In addition to the recovery of certain general and
administrative expenses incurred, our agreement provides for an
annual management fee payment which is based on three operating
profit tiers calculated for each year during the term of the
agreement. The management fee is further apportioned 60% to us
and 40% to an un-affiliated entity. To the extent that funds are
available for the trustee to make a distribution, the annual
management fee is paid when sufficient cash is paid after the
Guaranteed Payments (as defined in our agreement), and after the
repayment of all deficiency payments, including accrued interest
and premium. However, our right to the management fee accrues
each year during the term of the agreement and is paid when
sufficient cash is available for the trustee to make a
distribution.
The annual management fee is paid after the repayment of all
deficiency payments, including accrued interest and premium,
therefore due to the existence and length of time for repayment
of the deficiency amounts to the Company, no management fees
have been recognized. Management fees will be recognized in
accordance with SAB 104 when collectability is
reasonably assured.
77
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Cumulative management fees of $4,800 have not been recognized as
of December 31, 2010 and no management fees were recognized
during 2010, 2009 or 2008.
|
|
Note R.
|
Stock
Repurchases
|
2009
Stock Repurchases
In July 2008, our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase
shares of our common stock, on the open market or through
private purchases, up to $60,000 in aggregate.
During the first quarter of 2009, we repurchased
213,301 shares at an average price of $18.21 per share,
including average commissions of $0.01 per share, on the open
market. The total value of the first quarter transactions was
$3,885. We retired 200,650 shares during the first quarter
of 2009, and retired and the remaining 12,651 shares in
April 2009.
We did not make any share repurchases subsequent to the first
quarter of 2009. As of December 31, 2010, $18,973 remained
available for repurchase under 2008 authorization by the Board
of Directors.
|
|
Note S.
|
Domestic
and Foreign Operations
|
Business
Unit Segment Information
An operating segment is defined as a component of an enterprise
that engages in business activities from which it may earn
revenue and incur expenses, and about which separate financial
information is regularly evaluated by our chief operating
decision maker, in deciding how to allocate resources. Our chief
operating decision maker is the Companys president and
chief executive officer.
Each of the operating segments is directly responsible for
revenue and expenses related to their operations including
direct regional administrative costs. Finance, information
technology, human resources, and legal are shared functions that
are not allocated back to the four operating segments. The CODM
assesses the performance of each operating segment using
information about its revenue and operating income (loss) before
interest, taxes, and depreciation and amortization, but does not
evaluate segments using discrete asset information. There are no
inter-segment transactions and the Company does not allocate
interest and other income, interest expense, depreciation and
amortization or taxes to operating segments. The accounting
policies for segment reporting are the same as for the Company
as a whole.
Our business is managed based on regions administered by
executive vice presidents. The following is a summary of
revenues (excluding reimbursed management contract revenue) and
gross profit by regions for the years ended December 31,
2010, 2009, and 2008. Information related to prior periods has
been recast to conform to the current regional alignment.
78
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company has provided this business unit segment information
for all comparable prior periods. Segment information is
summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Margin
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Margin
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Margin
|
|
|
Revenues(a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region One
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
$
|
75,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
79,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
83,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
48,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Region One
|
|
|
123,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Two
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
2,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
25,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Region Two
|
|
|
28,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
21,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
51,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Region Three
|
|
|
73,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Four
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
39,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
45,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Region Four
|
|
|
84,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(321
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(304
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursed management contract revenue
|
|
|
411,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
721,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
695,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
700,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region One
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
$
|
4,765
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,227
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,470
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
27,194
|
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
|
|
27,679
|
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
29,711
|
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Region One
|
|
|
31,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Two
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
7,271
|
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
4,823
|
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
3,708
|
|
|
|
101
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Region Two
|
|
|
7,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
1,855
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
1,855
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
3,461
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
24,467
|
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
|
21,621
|
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
26,997
|
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Region Three
|
|
|
26,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Four
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
2,961
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
3,512
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
16,879
|
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
15,383
|
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
|
14,208
|
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Region Four
|
|
|
19,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease contracts
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
625
|
%
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
133
|
%
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
%
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)%
|
|
|
1,919
|
|
|
|
631
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other
|
|
|
1,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
|
86,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
47,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense percentage of gross profit
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
32,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses (income):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
5,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
27,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
10,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
17,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Standard Parking Corporation
|
|
$
|
16,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes reimbursed management contract revenue. |
79
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Region One encompasses operations in Delaware, District of
Columbia, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas,
Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, New
Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and Wisconsin.
Region Two encompasses our Canadian operations, event planning
and transportation, and our technology based parking and traffic
management systems.
Region Three encompasses operations in Arizona, California,
Colorado, Hawaii, Louisiana, Nevada, Texas, Utah, Washington,
and Wyoming.
Region Four encompasses all major airport and transportation
operations nationwide.
Other consists of ancillary revenue that is not specifically
identifiable to a region and insurance reserve adjustments
related to prior years.
The CODM does not evaluate segments using discrete asset
information.
|
|
Note T.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
We measure stock-based compensation expense at the grant date,
based on the fair value of the award, and the expense is
recognized over the requisite employee service period (generally
the vesting period) for awards expected to vest (considering
estimated forfeitures).
The Company has an amended and restated Long-Term Incentive Plan
that was adopted in conjunction with our IPO in 2004. On
February 27, 2008, our Board of Directors approved an
amendment to our Long-Term Incentive Plan, subject to
shareholder approval, that increased the maximum number of
shares of common stock available for awards under the Long-Term
Incentive Plan from 2,000,000 to 2,175,000 and extended the
Plans termination date. Our shareholders approved this
Plan amendment on April 22, 2008, and the Plan now
terminates twenty years from the date of such approval, or
April 22, 2028. Forfeited and expired options under the
Plan become generally available for reissuance. At
December 31, 2010, 117,902 shares remained available
for award under the Plan.
Stock
Options and Grants
We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the
fair value of each option grant as of the date of grant. The
volatilities are based on the 90 day historical volatility
of our common stock as the grant date. The risk free interest
rate is based on zero-coupon U.S. government issues with a
remaining term equal to the expected life of the option.
There were no options granted during the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. The Company recognized no
stock-based compensation expense related to stock options for
the year ended December 31, 2010 as all options previously
granted are fully vested. The Company recognized $30 and $2 of
stock-based compensation for the years ended December 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively. A total of 9,534 options expired in
the third quarter of 2010 with a weighted average exercise price
of $17.03. The option expirations are due to
out-of-the-money
options that were not exercised prior to their expiration date.
The expired options were returned to the pool of shares
generally available for future use under the Long-Term Incentive
Plan.
On April 28, 2010, we authorized vested stock grants to
certain directors totaling 12,892 shares. The total value
of the grant was $220 and is included in general and
administrative expenses. On September 22, 2010, we
authorized vested stock grants to certain directors totaling
1,504 shares. The total value of the grant was $25 and is
included in general and administrative expenses.
On August 14, 2009, we issued vested stock grants totaling
9,591 shares to certain directors. The total value of the
grant was $165 and is included in general and administrative
expense.
80
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On January 24, 2008, we issued vested stock grants totaling
1,084 shares to a director. The total value of the grant
was $25 and is included in general and administrative expenses.
On April 22, 2008, we issued vested stock grants totaling
18,900 shares to certain directors. The total value of the
grant was $385 and is included in general and administrative
expenses.
The Company recognized $245, $195 and $411 of stock based
compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008, respectively, which is included in general and
administrative expense. As of December 31, 2010, there was
no unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested options.
The following table summarizes the transactions pursuant to our
stock option plans for the last three years ended
December 31.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
(in Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
809,064
|
|
|
$
|
4.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(152,161
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
656,903
|
|
|
$
|
4.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(105,896
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
551,007
|
|
|
$
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(385,027
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(9,534
|
)
|
|
$
|
17.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
156,446
|
|
|
$
|
5.01
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
$
|
2,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and Exercisable at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
156,446
|
|
|
$
|
5.01
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
$
|
2,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, options to purchase
156,446, 551,007 and 656,903 shares of common stock,
respectively, were exercisable at weighted average exercise
prices of $5.01, $4.50 and $4.77 per share, respectively. The
total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years
ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 was $4,630, $1,386,
and $2,615, respectively.
There were no nonvested options as of December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008.
Performance-Based
Incentive Program
In December 2006, the Board of Directors adopted a
performance-based incentive program under our Long-Term
Incentive Plan. This program provided participating executives
with the opportunity to earn a combination of stock (50%) and
cash (50%) if certain performance targets for pre-tax income and
pre-tax free cash flow were achieved. During 2007, certain
participating executives became entitled to performance
restricted stock based on the stock price at the commencement of
the three-year performance cycle
(2007-2009),
and as a result, 29,698 shares were issued subject to
vesting upon the achievement of the performance goals. The plan
was completed as of December 31, 2009, at which time a
total of 17,677 shares had been released free of
restrictions in accordance with the achievement of the
cumulative program
81
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
performance goals. The remaining 12,021 shares were not
awarded under the performance-based incentive program and were
returned to the pool of shares generally available for future
use under the Long-Term Incentive Plan. Of the
12,021 shares that were not awarded, 2,815 shares were
retired in 2009 and the remaining 9,206 shares were retired
in 2010.
We record stock-based compensation expense for awards with
performance conditions based on the probable outcome of that
performance condition. The Company recognized no stock-based
compensation expense and no cash compensation expense related to
the performance-based incentive program for the year ended
December 31, 2010. The Company recognized $51 of
stock-based compensation expense and $51 of cash compensation
expense related to the performance-based incentive program, for
the year ended December 31, 2009, which is included in
general and administrative expenses. As of December 31,
2010, there is no unrecognized compensation costs related to the
performance-based incentive program.
Restricted
Stock Units
In March 2008, the Companys Board of Directors authorized
a one-time grant of 750,000 restricted stock units that
subsequently were awarded to members of our senior management
team on July 1, 2008. In November 2008, an additional 5,000
restricted stock units were also awarded. The restricted stock
units vest in one-third installments on each of the tenth,
eleventh and twelfth anniversaries of the grant date. The
restricted stock unit agreements provide for accelerated vesting
upon the recipient reaching their retirement age.
The cost of restricted stock units is determined using the fair
value of our common stock on the date of the grant, and
compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period. In
accordance with the guidance related to share-based payments, we
estimate forfeitures at the time of the grant and revise those
estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ
from those estimates. We use historical data to estimate
pre-vesting forfeitures and record stock-based compensation
expense only for those awards that are expected to vest.
A summary of the status of the restricted stock units as of
December 31, 2010, and changes during the year ended
December 31, 2010, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
Nonvested Shares
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Nonvested at January 1, 2010
|
|
|
755,000
|
|
|
$
|
18.26
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
755,000
|
|
|
$
|
18.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company recognized $2,065 and $2,046 of stock based
compensation expense related to the restricted stock units for
the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively,
which is included in general and administrative expense. As of
December 31, 2010, there was $7,863 of unrecognized
stock-based compensation costs, net of estimated forfeitures,
related to the restricted stock units that is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of approximately
6.9 years. As of December 31, 2009, there were $9,865
of unrecognized stock-based compensation costs, net of estimated
forfeitures related to the restricted stock units that were
expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
7.3 years.
|
|
Note U.
|
Hurricane
Katrina
|
On May 2, 2008, we entered into a definitive settlement
agreement with our insurance carrier which finalized all of our
open claims with respect to Hurricane Katrina. The settlement
agreement was for $4,225 of which $2,000 was received
previously. We were required to reimburse the owners of the
leased and managed locations for property damage of
approximately $2,228. After payment of settlement fees, expenses
and other amounts due under contractual arrangements, we
recorded $1,997 in pre-tax income, of which $1,577 was recorded
as revenue and $420 was recorded as a reduction of general and
administrative expenses.
83
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
STANDARD PARKING CORPORATION
James A. Wilhelm
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: March 11, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JAMES
A. WILHELM
James
A. Wilhelm
|
|
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
March 11, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ CHARLES
L. BIGGS
Charles
L. Biggs
|
|
Director
|
|
March 11, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ KAREN
M. GARRISON
Karen
M. Garrison
|
|
Director
|
|
March 11, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ROBERT
S. ROATH
Robert
S. Roath
|
|
Director and Non-Executive Chairman
|
|
March 11, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MICHAEL
J. ROBERTS
Michael
J. Roberts
|
|
Director
|
|
March 11, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ G.
MARC BAUMANN
G.
Marc Baumann
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
March 11, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ DANIEL
R. MEYER
Daniel
R. Meyer
|
|
Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller and
Assistant Treasurer (Principal Accounting Officer and Duly
Authorized Officer)
|
|
March 11, 2011
|
84
STANDARD
PARKING CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Beginning of
|
|
Costs and
|
|
|
|
End of
|
Description
|
|
Year
|
|
Expenses
|
|
Reductions(1)
|
|
Year(2)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deducted from asset accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
3,002
|
|
|
$
|
380
|
|
|
$
|
(577
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,805
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deducted from asset accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
3,867
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
(1,532
|
)
|
|
|
3,002
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deducted from asset accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
3,617
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
3,867
|
|
Deducted from asset accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax valuation account
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
318
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
369
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries
and reversal of provision. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes long-term receivables valuation allowance of
$2.5 million. |
85
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Company filed on June 2, 2004 (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
|
3.1.1
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Second Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company effective as of
January 7, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 3.1.1 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
|
3.1.2
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Second Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company effective as of
April 29, 2010 (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 3.1.3 of the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on August 6, 2010).
|
|
3.1.3
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Second Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company effective as of
May 6, 2010 (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 3.1.4 of the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on August 6, 2010).
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company dated
January 1, 2010 (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on January 27, 2010).
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
Specimen common stock certificate (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 4.1 of Amendment No. 2 to the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on May 18, 2004).
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated July 15, 2008
among the Company, various financial institutions, Bank of
America, N.A., and Wells Fargo, N.A. (incorporated by reference
to exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
field on July 18, 2008).
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
Rate Cap Transaction Letter Agreement dated March 1, 2010
betweeen the Company and Wells Fargo (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 8, 2010).
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
Rate Cap Transaction Letter Agreement dated March 1, 2010
between the Company and Fifth Third (incorporated by reference
to exhibit 10.2 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 8, 2010.
|
|
10.4+
|
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of March 30, 1998 between the
Company and Myron C. Warshauer (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.6 of the Companys Registration Statement
on
Form S-4,
File
No. 333-50437,
filed on April 17, 1998).
|
|
10.4.1+
|
|
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated July 7, 2003
between the Company and Myron C. Warshauer (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.4.1 of the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2004).
|
|
10.4.2+
|
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of May 10, 2004
between the Company and Myron C. Warshauer (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.4.2 of the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2004).
|
|
10.5+
|
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of March 26, 1998 between the
Company and Michael K. Wolf (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.12 of the Companys Registration Statement
on
Form S-4,
File
No. 333-50437,
filed on April 17, 1998).
|
|
10.5.1+
|
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of June 19, 2000
between the Company and Michael K. Wolf (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.5.1 of the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
|
10.5.2+
|
|
|
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of
December 6, 2000, between the Company and Michael K. Wolf,
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.22 to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2000).
|
|
10.5.3+
|
|
|
Third Amendment to Employment Agreement dated April 1, 2002
between the Company and Michael K. Wolf (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.19.3 to the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2002).
|
|
10.5.4+
|
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement dated December 31,
2003 between the Company and Michael K. Wolf (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.5.4 of the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10.5.5+
|
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Employment Agreement dated December 18,
2008 between the Company and Michael K. Wolf (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.5.5 of the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
|
10.5.6+
|
|
|
Sixth Amendment to Employment Agreement dated January 28,
2009 between the Company and Michael K. Wolf (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.3 of the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2009).
|
|
10.6+
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement dated as of
January 28, 2009 between Company and James A. Wilhelm
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 of the
Companys Current Report of
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2009).
|
|
10.7+
|
|
|
Employment Agreement dated May 18, 1998 between the Company
and Robert N. Sacks (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.24 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2001).
|
|
10.7.1+
|
|
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of
November 7, 2001 between the Company and Robert N. Sacks
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.25 of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2001).
|
|
10.7.2+
|
|
|
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of
August 1, 2003 between the Company and Robert N. Sacks
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.7.2 of the
Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
|
10.7.3+
|
|
|
Third Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of
April 1, 2005 between the Company and Robert N. Sacks
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.7.3 of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
|
10.7.4+
|
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of
December 29, 2008 between the Company and Robert N. Sacks
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.7.4 of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
|
10.7.5+
|
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of
January 28, 2009 between the Company and Robert N. Sacks
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.7.5 of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
|
10.8+
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement dated as of
December 1, 2002 between the Company and John Ricchiuto
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.22.2 of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2002).
|
|
10.8.1+
|
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Executive Employment
Agreement dated as of April 11, 2005, between the Company
and John Ricchiuto (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.3 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 7, 2005).
|
|
10.9+
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated March 1,
2005, between the Company and Steven A. Warshauer (incorporated
by reference to exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 7, 2005).
|
|
10.10+
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement dated as of
May 18, 2006 between the Company and Edward E. Simmons
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 of the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 24, 2006).
|
|
10.11+
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company
and G. Marc Baumann dated as of October 1, 2001
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.27 to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2001).
|
|
10.11.1+
|
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
between the Company and G. Marc Baumann dated as of
December 29, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.11.1 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
|
10.11.2+
|
|
|
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
between the Company and G. Marc Baumann dated as of
January 28, 2009 (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.2 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2009).
|
|
10.12+
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement dated as of
March 1, 2005, between the Company and Thomas L. Hagerman
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 of the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 7, 2005).
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10.12.1+
|
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Executive Employment
Agreement dated October 1, 2007 between the Company and
Thomas Hagerman (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1
to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed for September 30, 2007).
|
|
10.13+
|
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement dated March 15, 2005 between
the Company and Gerard M. Klaisle.
|
|
10.13.1+
|
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Executive Employment
Agreement dated December 29, 2008 between the Company and
Gerard M. Klaisle.
|
|
10.14+
|
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan dated as of May 1, 2004
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.12 of Amendment
No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on May 10, 2004).
|
|
10.14.1+
|
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan Amendment effective as of
April 22, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
Appendix B of the Companys 2008 Proxy on
Form DEF 14A, filed on April 1, 2008).
|
|
10.15+
|
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Stock Option Award Agreement
between the Company and an optionee (incorporated by reference
to exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on November 21, 2005).
|
|
10.15.1+
|
|
|
Form of First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Stock Option
Award Agreement between the Company and an optionee
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 of the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on November 21, 2005).
|
|
10.16
|
|
|
Consulting Agreement dated as of October 16, 2001 between
the Company and Shoreline Enterprises, LLC (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.36 of the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2001).
|
|
10.16.1
|
|
|
Amendment to Consulting Agreement dated as of May 10, 2004
between the Company and Shoreline Enterprises, LLC (incorporated
by reference to exhibit 10.14.1 of the Companys
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed for December 31, 2004).
|
|
10.17
|
|
|
Agreement of Lease dated as of June 4, 1998 between the
Company and LaSalle National Bank, as successor trustee to
LaSalle National Trust, N.A. as successor trustee to LaSalle
National Bank. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.21
of the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
|
10.17.1
|
|
|
First Amendment to Agreement of Lease dated as of May 1,
1999 between the Company and LaSalle National Bank, as successor
trustee to LaSalle National Trust, N.A. as successor trustee to
LaSalle National Bank (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.21.1 of the Companys Registration
Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
|
10.17.2
|
|
|
Second Amendment to Agreement of Lease dated as of July 27,
2000 between the Company and LaSalle National Bank, as successor
trustee to LaSalle National Trust, N.A. as successor trustee to
LaSalle National Bank (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10..2 of the Companys Registration Statement
on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
|
10.17.3
|
|
|
Third Amendment to Agreement of Lease dated as of
September 11, 2003 between the Company and LaSalle National
Bank, as successor trustee to LaSalle National Trust, N.A. as
successor trustee to LaSalle National Bank (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.21.3 of the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File
No. 333-112652,
filed on February 10, 2004).
|
|
10.18
|
|
|
Form of Property Management Agreement (incorporated by reference
to exhibit 10.30 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 10, 2006).
|
|
10.19
|
|
|
Form of Standard Parking Corporation Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement dated as of July 1, 2008 (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 2, 2008).
|
|
10.19.1
|
|
|
First Amendment to Form of Standard Parking Corporation
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
as filed on August 6, 2009).
|
|
10.20
|
|
|
Guaranty Agreement of APCOA/Standard Parking, Inc. dated as of
March 2000 to and for the benefit of the State of Connecticut,
Department of Transportation (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.27 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
|
Construction, Financing and Operating Special Facility Lease
Agreement dated as of March 2000 between the State of
Connecticut Department of Transportation and APCOA Bradley
Parking Company, LLC (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.28 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
|
10.22
|
|
|
Trust Indenture dated March 1, 2000 between State of
Connecticut and First Union National Bank as Trustee
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.29 of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 13, 2009).
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
Code of Ethics (incorporated by reference to exhibit 14.1
of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for December 31, 2002).
|
|
21*
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company.
|
|
23*
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated
as of March 11, 2011.
|
|
31.1*
|
|
|
Section 302 Certification dated March 11, 2011 for
James A. Wilhelm, Director, President and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer).
|
|
31.2*
|
|
|
Section 302 Certification dated March 11, 2011 for G.
Marc Baumann, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer).
|
|
31.3*
|
|
|
Section 302 Certification dated March 11, 2011 for
Daniel R. Meyer, Senior Vice President Corporate Controller and
Assistant Treasurer (Principal Accounting Officer and Duly
Authorized Officer).
|
|
32*
|
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, dated March 11, 2011.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
+ |
|
Management contract or compensation plan, contract or agreement. |
89