SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM INC - Annual Report: 2004 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)

For the transition period from  to                  

Commission file number 000-27823

Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (305) 441-6901

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Class A common stock, par value $.0001 per share

(Title of Class)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes þ         No o

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).

    Yes þ        No o

     As of June 30, 2004, the last business day of the Company’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the Company had 39,626,355 shares of Class A common stock, par value $.0001 per share, and 25,105,150 shares of Class B common stock, par value $.0001 per share, outstanding. As of June 30, 2004, the aggregate market value of the Class A common stock held by non-affiliates of the Company was approximately $396.5 million and the aggregate market value of the Class B common stock held by non-affiliates of the Company was approximately $5.0 million. We calculated the aggregate market value based upon the closing price of our Class A common stock reported on the Nasdaq National Market System on June 30, 2004 of $9.33 per share, and we have assumed that our shares of Class B common stock would trade at the same price per share as our shares of Class A common stock. (For purposes of this paragraph, directors and executive officers have been deemed affiliates.)

     As of March 14, 2005, 40,207,805 shares of Class A common stock, par value $.0001 per share, 24,573,500 shares of Class B common stock, par value $.0001 per share and 380,000 shares of Series C convertible preferred stock, $.002 par value per share, which are convertible into 7,600,000 shares of Class A common stock, were outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference: None

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

      This annual report on Form 10-K contains both historical and forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts, but rather reflect our current expectations concerning future results and events. These forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of statements that include phrases such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “foresee,” “likely,” “will” or other similar words or phrases. Similarly, statements that describe our objectives, plans or goals are or may be forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements to be different from any future results, performance and achievements expressed or implied by these statements. We do not have any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.

PART I

      All references to “we”, “us”, “our”, “SBS”, “our company” or “the Company” in this report mean Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and all entities owned or controlled by Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. and, if prior to 1994, mean our predecessor parent company Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc., a New Jersey corporation. Our executive offices are located at 2601 South Bayshore Drive, PH II, Coconut Grove, Florida 33133, and our telephone number is (305) 441-6901.

      We are the largest Hispanic-controlled radio broadcasting company in the United States. After giving effect to the proposed sale of our radio stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM, serving the Los Angeles, California market, we will own and operate 20 radio stations in markets that reach approximately 49% of the U.S. Hispanic population. Our stations are located in six of the top-ten Hispanic markets of Los Angeles, New York, Puerto Rico, Chicago, Miami and San Francisco. Los Angeles and New York have the largest and second largest Hispanic populations, and are the largest and second largest radio markets in the United States in terms of advertising revenue, respectively. Our top three markets, based on net revenues, are New York, Los Angeles and Miami.

      Mr. Raúl Alarcón, Jr. became our Chairman of the Board of Directors when we completed our initial public offering on November 2, 1999 and has been our Chief Executive Officer since June 1994 and our President and a director since October 1985. The Alarcón family has been involved in Spanish-language radio broadcasting since the 1950’s, when Mr. Pablo Raúl Alarcón, Sr., our Chairman Emeritus and a member of our Board of Directors, established his first radio station in Camagüey, Cuba. Members of our senior management team, on average, have over 20 years of experience in radio broadcasting.

Business Strategy

      We focus on maximizing the revenue and profitability of our radio station portfolio by strengthening the performance of our existing radio stations and making additional strategic station acquisitions in both our existing markets and in other markets that have a significant Hispanic population. We also focus on long-term growth by investing in advertising, programming research and on-air talent.

      Our growth strategy includes evaluating strategic acquisitions and divestitures in order to achieve a significant presence with clusters of stations in the top Hispanic markets. We generally consider acquisitions of stations in our existing markets, as well as acquisitions of stations in other markets with large Hispanic populations, where we can maximize our revenue through aggressive sales and programming efforts directed at U.S. Hispanic and general market advertisers. These acquisitions may include stations which do not currently target the U.S. Hispanic market, but which we believe can successfully be reformatted. Additionally, from time to time we explore investment opportunities in related media outlets targeting the U.S. Hispanic market.

Market Opportunity

      We believe that our focus on formats targeting U.S. Hispanic audiences in the largest Hispanic radio markets, together with our skill in programming and marketing to these audiences, provide us with significant opportunity for the following reasons:

      The above market opportunity information is based on data provided by Synovate — 2004 U.S. Hispanic Market Report, The Multicultural Economy 2004, The Selig Center for Economic Growth, University of Georgia, July 2004 and the HispanTelligence, Advertising Expenditures: 2000-2007.

Our Top Hispanic Radio Markets in the United States

      We operate stations in the top Hispanic radio markets in the United States, including Puerto Rico. Following the closing of the proposed sale of our radio stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM, serving the Los Angeles, California market, we will continue to own radio stations in Los Angeles, New York, Puerto Rico, Chicago, Miami and San Francisco.

      The following table sets forth certain statistical and demographic information relating to our radio markets:

Operating Strategy

      Our operating strategy focuses on maximizing our radio stations’ appeal to our targeted audiences and advertisers in order to increase revenue and cash flow while minimizing operating expenses. To achieve these goals, we focus on the following:

      Format high quality programming. We format the programming of each of our stations to capture a significant share of the Spanish-language audience. We use market research, including third-party consultants,

in-house research and periodic music testing, to assess listener preferences among the diverse groups in the Hispanic population in each station’s target demographic audience. We then refine our programming to reflect the results of this research and testing. Because the U.S. Hispanic population is so diverse, consisting of numerous identifiable groups from many different countries of origin, each with its own cultural and musical heritage, we strive to make ourselves very familiar with the musical tastes and preferences of each of the various Hispanic ethnic groups, and we customize our programming accordingly.

      Attract and retain strong local management teams. We employ local management teams in each of our markets that are responsible for the day-to-day operations of our radio stations. The teams typically consist of a general manager, a general sales manager and a programming director. Stations are staffed with managers who have experience in and knowledge of the local radio market and/or the local Hispanic market because of the cultural diversity of the Hispanic population from market to market in the United States. We believe this approach improves our flexibility and responsiveness to changing conditions in each of the markets we serve.

      Utilize focused sales efforts. To capture market share, our sales force focuses on converting audience share into rate and revenue increases. Strategically, we hire sales professionals who are experts at Hispanic and general market advertising. We also value knowledgeable account managers skilled at dealing directly with clients in the local market. Spanish-language radio is uniquely positioned for national campaigns, regional marketing plans and local promotions in our diverse markets. We believe that our focused sales efforts are working to increase media spending targeted at the Hispanic consumer market and will enable us to continue to achieve rate and revenue growth, and to narrow the gap between the level of advertising currently targeted towards U.S. Hispanics and the actual and potential buying power of our communities.

      Control station operating costs. We employ a disciplined approach to operating our radio stations. We emphasize the control of each station’s operating costs through detailed budgeting, tight control over staffing levels and constant expense analysis. While local management is responsible for the day-to-day operation of each station, corporate management is responsible for long-term and strategic planning, establishing policies and procedures, maximizing cost savings through centralized control where appropriate, allocating corporate resources and maintaining overall control of the stations.

      Effective use of promotions and special events. We use our expertise in marketing to the Hispanic consumer in each of the markets in which we operate stations to attract a large share of advertising revenue. We believe that effective promotional efforts play a significant role in both adding new listeners and increasing listener loyalty. We organize special promotional appearances, such as station van appearances at client events, concerts and tie-ins to special events, which form an important part of our marketing strategy. Many of these events build advertiser loyalty because they enable us to offer advertisers an additional way to reach the Hispanic consumer. In some instances, these events are co-sponsored by local television stations, newspapers and promoters, allowing our mutual advertisers to reach a larger combined audience.

      Maintain strong community involvement. We have been, and will continue to be, actively involved in the local communities that we serve. Our radio stations participate in numerous community programs, fund-raisers and activities benefiting the local community and Hispanics abroad. Examples of our community involvement include free public service announcements, free equal-opportunity employment announcements, tours and discussions held by radio station personalities with school and community groups designed to deter drug and gang involvement, free concerts and events designed to promote family values within the local Hispanic communities, charitable contributions to organizations which benefit the Hispanic community, and extended coverage, when necessary, of significant events which have an impact on the U.S. Hispanic population. Our stations and members of our management have received numerous community service awards and acknowledgments from governmental entities and community and philanthropic organizations for their service. We believe that this involvement helps build and maintain station awareness and listener loyalty.

Programming

      We format the programming of each of our stations to capture a substantial share of the U.S. Hispanic audience in its respective market. The U.S. Hispanic population is diverse, consisting of numerous identifiable groups from many different countries of origin, each with its own musical and cultural heritage. The music,

culture, customs and Spanish dialects vary from one radio market to another. We strive to be very familiar with the musical tastes and preferences of each of the various Hispanic ethnic groups and customize our programming to match the local preferences of our target demographic audience in each market we serve. We have in-house research departments located in Miami and Los Angeles, which conduct extensive radio market research on a daily, weekly, monthly and annual basis. By employing listener study groups and telephone surveys modeled after Arbitron® written survey methodology, but with even larger sample sizes than Arbitron®, we are able to assess listener preferences, track trends and gauge our success on a daily basis, well before Arbitron® quarterly results are published. In this manner, we can respond immediately, if necessary, to any changing preferences of listeners and/or trends by refining our programming to reflect the results of our research and testing. Each of our programming formats is described below.

      The following table lists the programming formats of our radio stations and the target demographic group of each station (after giving effect to the proposed sale of our radio stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM, serving the Los Angeles, California market).

Radio Station Portfolio

      The following is a general description of each of our markets. The market revenue information is based on data provided by BIA Research, Inc.’s Investing in Radio, 2004 Market Report, Synovate — 2004 U.S. Hispanic Market Report, the U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates for Puerto Rico — 2002 and the U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000.

Los Angeles

      The Los Angeles market is the largest radio market in terms of advertising revenue which was projected to be approximately $1.05 billion in 2004. In 2004, the Los Angeles market had the largest U.S. Hispanic population with approximately 7.8 million Hispanics, which is approximately 44.5% of the Los Angeles market’s total population. The Los Angeles market experienced annual radio revenue growth of 9.5% between 1998 and 2003. Radio revenue in the Los Angeles market is expected to grow at an annual rate of 5.5% between 2003 and 2008.

New York

      The New York market is the second largest radio market in terms of advertising revenue which was projected to be approximately $816.3 million in 2004. In 2004, the New York market had the second largest U.S. Hispanic population, with approximately 4.3 million Hispanics, which is approximately 20.5% of the New York market’s total population. We believe that we own the strongest franchise in our target demographic group, with two of the four FM Spanish-language radio stations in the New York market, WSKQ-FM and WPAT-FM. The New York market experienced annual radio revenue growth of 5.3%

between 1998 and 2003. Radio revenue in the New York market is expected to grow at an annual rate of 4.6% between 2003 and 2008.

Puerto Rico

      The Puerto Rico market is the thirty-second largest radio market in terms of advertising revenue which was projected to be approximately $102.1 million in 2004. In 2004, the Puerto Rico market had the third largest U.S. Hispanic population, with approximately 3.8 million Hispanics, which is estimated to be approximately 98.0% of the Puerto Rico market’s total population. The Puerto Rico market experienced annual radio revenue growth of 4.9% between 1998 and 2003. Radio revenue in the Puerto Rico market is expected to grow at an annual rate of 4.9% between 2003 and 2008.

Chicago

      The Chicago market is the third largest radio market in terms of advertising revenue which was projected to be approximately $611.8 million in 2004. In 2004, the Chicago market had the fourth largest U.S. Hispanic population, with approximately 1.8 million Hispanics, which is approximately 19.0% of the Chicago market’s total population. The Chicago market experienced annual radio revenue growth of 6.5% between 1998 and 2003. Radio revenue in the Chicago market is expected to grow at an annual rate of 5.0% between 2003 and 2008.

Miami

      The Miami market is the eleventh largest radio market in terms of advertising revenue which was projected to be approximately $287.3 million in 2004. In 2004, the Miami market had the fifth largest U.S. Hispanic population, with approximately 1.8 million Hispanics, which is approximately 43.1% of the Miami market’s total population. The Miami market experienced annual radio revenue growth of 5.3% between 1998 and 2003. Radio revenue in the Miami market is expected to grow at an annual rate of 4.7% between 2003 and 2008.

San Francisco

      The San Francisco market is the fourth largest radio market in terms of advertising revenue which was projected to be approximately $428.2 million in 2004. In 2004, the San Francisco market had the eighth largest U.S. Hispanic population, with approximately 1.5 million Hispanics, which is approximately 21.3% of the San Francisco market’s total population. The San Francisco market experienced annual radio revenue growth of 5.6% between 1998 and 2003. Radio revenue in the San Francisco market is expected to grow at an annual rate of 4.2% between 2003 and 2008.

Latin Music On-Line (“LaMusica.com”)

      LaMusica.com is our bilingual Spanish-English Internet website and on-line community that focuses on the Hispanic market. LaMusica.com, which has links to the websites of some of our radio stations, is a provider of original information and interactive content related to Latin music, entertainment, news and culture. LaMusica.com and our network of station websites generate revenue primarily from advertising and sponsorship. We believe that LaMusica.com, together with our radio station portfolio, enables our audience to enjoy additional targeted and culturally-specific entertainment options, such as concert listings, music reviews, local entertainment calendars, and interactive content on popular Latin recording artists and entertainers. At the same time, LaMusica.com enables our advertisers to cost-effectively reach their targeted Hispanic consumers through an additional and dynamic medium.

Management and Personnel

      As of March 14, 2005, we had approximately 529 full-time employees, 10 of whom were primarily involved in corporate management and/or station management, 203 of whom were primarily involved in the programming of our stations, 194 of whom were primarily involved in sales, 107 of whom were primarily

involved in general administration and 15 of whom were primarily involved in technical or engineering capacities.

      Our business depends upon the efforts, abilities and expertise of our executive officers and other key employees, including on-air talent, and our ability to hire and retain qualified personnel. The loss of any of these executive officers and key employees, particularly Raúl Alarcón, Jr., our Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President, could have a material adverse effect on our business. We do not maintain key man life insurance on any of our personnel.

Seasonality

      Seasonal broadcasting revenue fluctuations are common in the radio broadcasting industry and are primarily due to fluctuations in advertising expenditures by local and national advertisers. Our net broadcasting revenues vary throughout the year. Historically, our first calendar quarter (January through March) has generally produced the lowest net broadcasting revenue for the year because of routine post-holiday decreases in advertising expenditures.

Patents, Trademarks, Licenses and Franchises

      In the course of our business, we use various trademarks, trade names, domain names and service marks, including logos, with our products and services and in our advertising and promotions. We believe our trademarks, trade names, domain names and service marks are important to our business and we intend to continue to protect and promote these where appropriate and to protect the registration of new trademarks, including through legal action. We do not hold or depend upon any material patent, government license, franchise or concession, except the broadcast licenses granted by the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”).

Advertising

      The vast majority of our revenue is derived from advertising. Advertising revenue is usually classified into two categories — “national” or “local.” “National” generally refers to advertising that is solicited by a representative firm for national advertisers. Our national sales representative is SBS/ Interep LLC, a division of Interep National Radio Sales, Inc. “Network” advertising revenue is a subset category of national advertising revenue and it refers to advertising purchased by our other strategic alliance agreements. “Local” refers to advertising purchased by advertisers and agencies in the local market served by a particular station.

      Radio is one of the most efficient and cost-effective means for advertisers to reach targeted demographic groups. Advertising rates charged by a radio station are based primarily on the station’s ability to attract listeners in a given market and on the attractiveness to advertisers of the station’s listener demographics as well as the demand on available advertising inventory. Rates also vary depending upon a program’s popularity among the listeners an advertiser is seeking to attract and the availability of alternative media in the market. Radio advertising rates generally are highest during the morning drive-time hours which are the peak hours for radio audience listening. A radio broadcaster that has multiple stations in a market is appealing to national advertisers because these advertisers can reach more listeners, thus enabling the broadcaster to attract a greater share of the advertising revenue in a given market. We believe that we will be able to continue increasing our rates as new and existing advertisers recognize the increasing desirability of targeting the growing Hispanic population in the United States.

      Each station broadcasts a predetermined number of advertisements per hour with the actual number depending upon the format of a particular station and any programming strategy we are utilizing to attract listeners. We also determine the number of advertisements broadcast hourly that can maximize the station’s revenue without negatively impacting its audience listener levels. While there may be shifts from time to time in the number of advertisements broadcast during a particular time of the day, the total number of advertisements broadcast on a particular station generally does not vary significantly from year to year.

      We have short and long-term contracts with our advertisers, although it is customary in the radio industry that the majority of advertising contracts are short-term and generally run for less than three months. In each of our broadcasting markets, we employ sales personnel to obtain local advertising revenue. Our local sales force is important to maintaining relationships with key local advertisers and agencies and identifying new advertisers. We pay commissions to our local sales staff upon receipt of payment for their respective billings which assists in our collection efforts. We offer assistance to local advertisers by providing them with studio facilities to produce commercials free of charge and, in some cases, we produce the commercials.

Competition

      The success of each of our stations depends significantly upon its audience ratings and its share of the overall advertising revenue within its market. The radio broadcasting industry is a highly competitive business. Each of our radio stations competes with both Spanish-language and English-language radio stations in its market, as well as satellite radio with other advertising media such as newspapers, broadcast television, cable television, the Internet, magazines, outdoor advertising, transit advertising and direct mail marketing. Several of the radio stations with which we compete are subsidiaries of large national or regional companies that may have substantially greater financial resources than we do. Factors which are material to our competitive position include management experience, our radio station’s rank in its market, signal strength and frequency and audience demographics, including the nature of the Spanish-language market targeted by a particular station.

      Although the radio broadcasting industry is highly competitive, some barriers to entry do exist. These barriers can be mitigated to some extent by changing existing radio station formats and upgrading power, among other actions. The operation of a radio station requires a license or other authorization from the FCC, and the number of radio stations that can operate in a given market is limited by the availability of FM and AM radio frequencies allotted by the FCC to communities in a given market. In addition, the FCC’s multiple ownership rules regulate the number of stations that may be owned and controlled by a single entity in a given market. However, in recent years, these rules have changed significantly. For a discussion of FCC regulation, see “Federal Regulation of Radio Broadcasting” below.

      The radio industry is also subject to competition from new media technologies that are being developed or introduced, such as the delivery of audio programming by cable television systems, by satellite and by terrestrial delivery of digital audio broadcasting (known as “DAB”). DAB may deliver to nationwide and regional audiences, multi-channel, and multi-format digital radio services with sound quality equivalent to that of compact discs. The FCC has licensed companies for the use of a new technology, satellite digital audio radio services (known as “SDARS”), to deliver audio programming. SDARS provide a medium for the delivery by satellite of multiple new audio programming formats to local and national audiences. Some radio broadcast stations, including ours, are presently utilizing digital technology on their existing frequencies to deliver audio programming. The FCC also has begun granting licenses for a new “low power” radio or “microbroadcasting” service to provide low cost neighborhood service on frequencies which would not interfere with existing stations.

      The FCC has selected In-Band On-Channel^tm, or IBOC, as the exclusive technology for introduction of terrestrial digital operations by AM and FM radio stations. The FCC has authorized the commencement of “hybrid” IBOC transmissions, that is, simultaneous broadcast in both digital and analog format, after receipt of individual grant of special temporary authority by the FCC pending the adoption of formal licensing and service rules. The advantages of digital audio broadcasting over traditional analog broadcasting technology include improved sound quality and the ability to offer a greater variety of auxiliary services. IBOC technology permits a station to transmit radio programming in both analog and digital formats, and eventually in digital only formats, using the bandwidth that the radio station is currently licensed to use. It is unclear what impact the introduction of digital broadcasting will have on the radio markets in which we compete. The FCC also has a pending proceeding which contemplates the use of digital technology by existing AM and FM radio broadcast stations to both improve sound quality and provide spectrum for enhanced data services to complement the existing programming service and provide new business opportunities for radio broadcasters. Under Special Temporary Authority, the FCC has authorized use of IBOC digital technology developed by

iBiquity Digital Corporation, or iBiquity, on FM stations full-time and on AM stations day-time only. The final digital radio rules remain under consideration by the FCC.

      We currently utilize IBOC digital technology on one of our stations and are considering installing it on other of our stations over the next few years. This digital technology, which is not required by the FCC, offers the possibility of multiple audio channels in our assigned frequency.

      The delivery of information through the presently unregulated Internet also could create a new form of competition. The radio broadcasting industry historically has grown despite the introduction of new technologies for the delivery of entertainment and information, such as television broadcasting, cable television, audio tapes, MP3 and compact discs. A growing population and the greater availability of radios, particularly car and portable radios, have contributed to this growth. We cannot assure you, however, that the development or introduction of any new media technology will not have an adverse effect on the radio broadcasting industry.

      We cannot predict what other matters may be considered in the future by the FCC, nor can we assess in advance what impact, if any, the implementation of any of these proposals or changes may have on our business. See “Federal Regulation of Radio Broadcasting” below.

Antitrust

      We have completed, and in the future may complete, strategic acquisitions and divestitures in order to achieve a significant presence with clusters of stations in the top Hispanic markets. Since the passage of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the Justice Department has become more aggressive in reviewing proposed acquisitions of radio stations and radio station networks. The Justice Department is particularly aggressive when the proposed buyer already owns one or more radio stations in the market of the station it is seeking to buy. Recently, the Justice Department has challenged a number of radio broadcasting transactions. Some of those challenges ultimately resulted in consent decrees requiring, among other things, divestitures of certain stations. In general, the Justice Department has more closely scrutinized radio broadcasting acquisitions that result in local market shares in excess of 40% of radio advertising revenue. Similarly, the FCC staff has announced new procedures to review proposed radio broadcasting transactions even if the proposed acquisition otherwise complies with the FCC’s ownership limitations. In particular, the FCC may invite public comment on proposed radio transactions that the FCC believes, based on its initial analysis, may present ownership concentration concerns in a particular local radio market.

Federal Regulation of Radio Broadcasting

      The radio broadcasting industry is subject to extensive and changing regulation by the FCC of programming, technical operations, employment and other business practices. The FCC regulates radio broadcast stations pursuant to the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the “Communications Act”). The Communications Act permits the operation of radio broadcast stations only in accordance with a license issued by the FCC upon a finding that the grant of a license would serve the public interest, convenience and necessity. The Communications Act provides for the FCC to exercise its licensing authority to provide a fair, efficient and equitable distribution of broadcast service throughout the United States. Among other things, the FCC:

      The Communications Act prohibits the assignment of an FCC license, or other transfer of control of an FCC licensee, without the prior approval of the FCC. In determining whether to approve assignments or transfers, and in determining whether to grant or renew a radio broadcast license, the FCC considers a number of factors pertaining to the licensee (and any proposed licensee), including restrictions on foreign ownership, compliance with FCC media ownership limits and other FCC rules, licensee character and compliance with the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988.

      The following is a brief summary of certain provisions of the Communications Act and specific FCC rules and policies. This summary does not purport to be complete and is subject to the text of the Communications Act, the FCC’s rules and regulations, and the rulings of the FCC. You should refer to the Communications Act and these FCC rules, regulations and rulings for further information concerning the nature and extent of federal regulation of radio broadcast stations.

      A licensee’s failure to observe the requirements of the Communications Act or FCC rules and policies may result in the imposition of various sanctions, including admonishment, fines, the grant of renewal terms of less than eight years, the grant of a license with conditions or, for particularly egregious violations, the denial of a license renewal application, the revocation of an FCC license or the denial of FCC consent to acquire additional broadcast properties, all of which could have a material adverse impact on our operations.

      Congress and the FCC have had under consideration, and may in the future consider and adopt, new laws, regulations and policies regarding a wide variety of matters that could, directly or indirectly, affect the operation, ownership and profitability of our radio stations, result in the loss of audience share and advertising revenue for our radio broadcast stations or affect our ability to acquire additional radio broadcast stations or finance these acquisitions. Such matters may include:

      We cannot predict what changes, if any, might be adopted, or what other matters might be considered in the future, nor can we judge in advance what impact, if any, the implementation of any particular proposals or changes might have on our business.

FCC Licenses

      The Communications Act provides that a broadcast station license may be granted to any applicant if the granting of the application would serve the public interest, convenience and necessity, subject to certain limitations. In making licensing determinations, the FCC considers an applicant’s legal, technical, financial and other qualifications. The FCC grants radio broadcast station licenses for specific periods of time and, upon

application, may renew them for additional terms. Under the Communications Act, radio broadcast station licenses may be granted for a maximum term of eight years.

      The following table sets forth the license expiration dates of each of our radio stations after giving effect to the proposed sale of our radio stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM, serving the Los Angeles, California market.

      Generally, the FCC renews radio broadcast licenses without a hearing upon a finding that:

      After considering these factors, the FCC may grant the license renewal application without or with conditions, including renewal for a term less than the maximum term otherwise permitted by law, or hold an evidentiary hearing.

      The Communications Act authorizes the filing of petitions to deny a license renewal application during specific periods of time after a renewal application has been filed. Interested parties, including members of the public, may use these petitions to raise issues concerning a renewal applicant’s qualifications. If a substantial and material question of fact concerning a renewal application is raised by the FCC or other interested parties, or if for any reason the FCC cannot determine that granting a renewal application would serve the public interest, convenience and necessity, the FCC will hold an evidentiary hearing on the application. If, as a result of an evidentiary hearing, the FCC determines that the licensee has failed to meet the requirements specified above and that no mitigating factors justify the imposition of a lesser sanction, then the FCC may deny a license renewal application. Historically, our licenses have been renewed without any conditions or sanctions being imposed, but we cannot assure that the licenses of each of our stations will continue to be renewed or will continue to be renewed without conditions or sanctions.

      The FCC classifies each AM and FM radio station. An AM radio station operates on either a clear channel, regional channel or local channel. A clear channel is one on which AM radio stations are assigned to serve wide areas, particularly at night.

      The minimum and maximum facilities requirements for an FM radio station are determined by its class. Possible FM class designations depend upon the geographic zone in which the transmitter of the FM radio station is located. In general, commercial FM radio stations are classified as follows, in order of increasing power and antenna height: Class A, B1, C3, B, C2, C1 or C radio stations. The FCC has created a subclass of Class C stations based on antenna height. Stations not meeting the minimum height requirement within a three-year transition period may be downgraded to a new Class C0 category.

      Ownership Matters. The Communications Act requires prior approval by the FCC for the assignment of a broadcast license or the transfer of control of a corporation or other entity holding a license. In determining whether to approve an assignment of a radio broadcast license or a transfer of control of a broadcast licensee, the FCC considers, among other things:

      To obtain the FCC’s prior consent to assign or transfer a broadcast license, appropriate applications must be filed with the FCC. The application must be placed on public notice for a period of 30 days during which petitions to deny the application may be filed by interested parties, including members of the public. Informal objections may be filed any time up until the FCC acts upon the application. If the FCC grants an assignment or transfer application, interested parties have 30 days from public notice of the grant to seek reconsideration of that grant. The FCC usually has an additional ten days to set aside such grant on its own motion. When ruling on an assignment or transfer application, the FCC is prohibited from considering whether the public interest might be served by an assignment or transfer to any party other than the assignee or transferee specified in the application.

      Under the Communications Act, a broadcast license may not be granted to or held by any corporation that has more than 20% of its capital stock owned or voted by non-U.S. citizens or entities or their representatives, by foreign governments or their representatives, or by non-U.S. corporations. Furthermore, the Communications Act provides that no FCC broadcast license may be granted to or held by any corporation directly or indirectly controlled by any other corporation of which more than 25% of the capital stock of record is owned or voted by non-U.S. citizens or entities or their representatives, by foreign governments or their representatives, or by non-U.S. corporations, if the FCC finds the public interest will be served by the refusal or revocation of such license. These restrictions apply in modified form to other forms of business organizations, including partnerships and limited liability companies. Thus, the licenses for our stations could be revoked if more than 25% of our outstanding capital stock is issued to or for the benefit of non-U.S. citizens.

      The FCC generally applies its other broadcast ownership limits to “attributable” interests held by an individual, corporation, partnership or other association or entity, including limited liability companies. In the case of a corporation holding broadcast licenses, the interests of officers, directors and those who, directly or indirectly, have the right to vote 5% or more of the stock of a licensee corporation are generally deemed attributable interests, as are positions as an officer or director of a corporate parent of a broadcasting licensee. The FCC treats all partnership interests as attributable, except for those limited partnership interests that under FCC policies are considered insulated from material involvement in the management or operation of the media-related activities of the partnership. The FCC currently treats limited liability companies like limited

partnerships for purposes of attribution. Stock interests held by insurance companies, mutual funds, bank trust departments and certain other passive investors that hold stock for investment purposes only become attributable with the ownership of 20% or more of the voting stock of the corporation holding broadcast licenses.

      To assess whether a voting stock interest in a direct or an indirect parent corporation of a broadcast licensee is attributable, the FCC uses a “multiplier” analysis in which non-controlling voting stock interests are deemed proportionally reduced at each non-controlling link in a multi-corporation ownership chain. A time brokerage agreement with another radio station in the same market creates an attributable interest in the brokered radio station as well as for purposes of the FCC’s local radio station ownership rules, if the agreement affects more than 15% of the brokered radio station’s weekly broadcast hours.

      Debt instruments, non-voting stock options or other non-voting interests with rights of conversion to voting interests that have not yet been exercised and insulated limited partnership interests where the limited partner is not materially involved in the media-related activities of the partnership generally do not subject their holders to attribution. However, the holder of an equity or debt instrument or interest in a broadcast licensee, cable television system, daily newspaper or other media outlet shall have that interest attributed if the equity (including all stock holdings whether voting or non-voting, common or preferred) and debt interest or interests in the aggregate exceed 33% of the total asset value, defined as the aggregate of all equity plus all debt of that media outlet and the interest holder also holds an interest in a broadcast licensee, cable television system, newspaper or other media outlet operating in the same market that is subject to the broadcast multiple ownership or cross-ownership rules and is otherwise attributable or if the interest holder supplies over 15% of the total weekly broadcast programming hours of the station in which the interest is held.

      The Communications Act and FCC rules generally restrict ownership, operation or control of, or the common holding of attributable interests in:

      We are uncertain as to which “cross-ownership” or “cross-media” rules will be used by the FCC in the future. The FCC previously adopted new ownership rules which were appealed. While a federal court granted the Commission authority to implement the radio ownership rules, the court denied the proposed rules regarding newspapers/ broadcast and radio/television cross-ownership. Therefore, absent waivers, we would not be permitted to own a radio broadcast station and acquire an attributable interest in any daily newspaper in the same market where we then owned any radio broadcast station. Our stockholders, officers, or directors, absent a waiver would not be able to hold an attributable interest in a daily newspaper or television broadcast station in those same markets. However, the ownership limits are extremely fluid at this time and the court’s decision is being appealed. In addition, the FCC or Congress may impose new ownership regulations upon broadcast licensees in the near future.

      Although current FCC nationwide radio broadcast ownership rules allow one entity to own, control or hold attributable interest in an unlimited number of FM radio stations and AM radio stations nationwide, the Communications Act and the FCC’s rules limit the number of radio broadcast stations in local markets (defined as those counties in the Arbitron® defined market) in which a single entity may own an attributable interest as follows:

      The United States Congress is currently reviewing the FCC’s revised ownership rules. It is possible that the new rules may be modified or even repealed, dependent upon Congressional action. In addition, the FCC has announced a series of initiatives to enhance localism among radio and television broadcasters. Accordingly, the FCC or Congress may ultimately impose further regulations upon broadcast licensees.

      Programming and Operations. The Communications Act requires broadcasters to serve the public interest. A broadcast licensee is required to present programming in response to community problems, needs and interests and to maintain certain records demonstrating its responsiveness. The FCC will consider complaints from listeners about a broadcast station’s programming when it evaluates the licensee’s renewal application, but listeners’ complaints also may be filed and considered at any time. Stations also must pay regulatory and application fees, and follow various FCC rules that regulate, among other things, political advertising, equal employment opportunity, the broadcast of obscene or indecent programming, sponsorship identification, the broadcast of contests and lotteries and technical operation.

      The FCC requires that licensees not discriminate in hiring practices, develop and implement programs designed to promote equal employment opportunities and submit reports to the FCC on these matters annually and in connection with each license renewal application.

      The FCC rules also prohibit a licensee from simulcasting more than 25% of its programming on another radio station in the same broadcast service (that is, AM/ AM or FM/ FM). The simulcasting restriction applies if the licensee owns both radio broadcast stations or owns one and programs the other through a local marketing agreement, provided that the contours of the radio stations overlap in a certain manner.

      Time Brokerage Agreements. Occasionally, radio stations enter into time brokerage agreements or local marketing agreements. These agreements take various forms. Separately owned and licensed radio stations may agree to function cooperatively in programming, advertising sales and other matters, subject to compliance with the antitrust laws and the FCC’s rules and policies, including the requirement that the licensee of each radio station maintain independent control over the programming and other operations of its own radio station.

      Joint Sales Agreements. Over the past few years, a number of radio stations have entered in cooperative arrangements commonly known as joint sales agreements or JSAs. The FCC has determined that where two radio stations are both located in the same market and a party with a cognizable interest in one such station sells more than 15% of the advertising per week of the other station, that party shall be treated as if it has an attributable interest in that brokered station.

      RF Radiation. In 1985, the FCC adopted rules based on a 1982 American National Standards Institute, or ANSI standard regarding human exposure to levels of radio frequency, or RF, radiation. These rules require applicants for renewal of broadcast licenses or modification of existing licenses to inform the FCC at the time of filing such applications whether an existing broadcast facility would expose people to RF radiation in excess of certain limits. In 1992, ANSI adopted a new standard for RF radiation exposure that, in some respects, was more restrictive in the amount of environmental RF radiation exposure permitted. The FCC has since adopted more restrictive radiation limits which became effective October 15, 1997, and which are based in part on the revised ANSI standard.

      Digital Audio Radio Satellite Service. The FCC has adopted rules for the Digital Audio Radio Satellite Service, also known as DARS, in the 2310-2360 MHz frequency band. In adopting the rules, the FCC stated, “although healthy satellite DARS systems are likely to have some adverse impact on terrestrial radio audience

size, revenues and profits, the record does not demonstrate that licensing satellite DARS would have such a strong adverse impact that it threatens the provision of local service.” The FCC has granted two nationwide licenses, one to XM Satellite Radio, which began broadcasting in May 2001, and a second to Sirius Satellite Radio, which began broadcasting in February 2002 in three markets, and has now expanded nationwide. The satellite radio systems provide multiple channels of audio programming in exchange for the payment of a subscription fee. Because the DARS service is in its beginning stages, we cannot predict whether, or the extent to which, it will have an adverse impact on our business. However, the two nationwide licenses are presently competing with terrestrial radio for talent and, to a lesser extent, licenses.

      Low Power Radio Broadcast Service. The FCC has adopted rules establishing two classes of a low power radio service, both of which will operate in the existing FM radio band; a primary class with a maximum operating power of 100 watts and a secondary class with a maximum power of 10 watts. These low power radio stations will have limited service areas of 3.5 miles and 1 to 2 miles, respectively. Implementation of a low power radio service or microbroadcasting will provide an additional audio programming service that could compete with our radio stations for listeners, but we cannot predict the effect upon us.

      Proposed Changes. The FCC, on January 13, 1999, released a study and conducted a forum on the impact of advertising practices on minority-owned and minority-formatted broadcast stations. The study provided evidence that advertisers often exclude radio stations serving minority audiences from ad placements and pay them less than other stations when they are included. On February 22, 1999, a “summit” was held at the FCC’s headquarters to continue this initiative where participants considered the advertising study’s recommendations to adopt a code of conduct to oppose unfair ad placement and payment, to encourage diversity in hiring and training and to enforce laws against unfair business practices. We cannot predict at this time whether the FCC will adopt new rules that would require the placement of part of an advertiser’s budget on minority-owned and minority-formatted broadcast stations, and, if so, whether such rules would have an adverse impact on us. However, presently no new rules have been issued and the FCC is monitoring advertising practices to see if there is improvement without further intervention.

Environmental Matters

      As the owner, lessee or operator of various real properties and facilities, we are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. Historically, compliance with these laws and regulations has not had a material adverse effect on our business. We cannot assure you, however, that compliance with existing or new environmental laws and regulations will not require us to make significant expenditures of funds.

      In connection with the sale of WXLX-AM in 1997, we assigned the lease of the transmitter for WXLX in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, to the purchaser of the station. The transmitter is located on a former landfill which ceased operations in the late 1960’s. Although WXLX-AM was sold, we retained potential exposure to possible environmental liabilities relating to the transmitter site (the “Transmitter Property”).

      On December 4, 2002, the New Jersey Meadowlands Commission (“NJMC”) filed a Verified Complaint in condemnation in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Bergen County, against Frank F. Viola, Thomas C. Viola Trust and Louis Viola Company (the “Property Owners”) to acquire the Transmitter Property. The Transmitter Property is one of a number of sites that the NJMC is acquiring for a redevelopment project. Many of these sites (owned both publicly and privately) were used for landfill operations including the Transmitter Property. We were named as a defendant in the litigation by virtue of our interest of record in the Transmitter Property as a former leaseholder prior to the aforementioned lease assignment.

      The litigation has been settled and concluded by the entry on August 31, 2004 of an Amended Order for Final Judgment (“Final Order”). The Final Order provided for the compensation to be paid to the Property Owners, and for waiver of claims for landfill closure costs against the Property Owners. While the Final Order reserved the NJMC’s claims for environmental remediation against the other parties, including us, a Settlement Agreement entered in the Court record further stipulated that the NJMC’s redeveloper will agree to indemnify and insure (under policies expiring on December 31, 2021 and providing coverage in the amount

of $50.0 million) such other parties (including us) against claims for remediation of environmental contamination. We were named as an insured on the aforementioned policy. The terms of an Indemnity Agreement have been negotiated and remain subject only to a formal memorialization.

      On March 19, 2002, the Environmental Quality Board, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico Regional Office, or EQB, inspected our transmitter site in Maricao, Puerto Rico. Based on the inspection, EQB issued a letter to us on March 26, 2002 noting the following potential violations: (1) alleged violation of EQB’s Regulation for the Control of Underground Injection through construction and operation of a septic tank (for sanitary use only) at each of the two antenna towers without the required permits, (2) alleged violation of EQB’s Regulation for the Control of Atmospheric Pollution through construction and operation of an emergency generator of more than 10hp at each transmitter tower without the required permits and (3) alleged failure to show upon request an EQB approved emergency plan detailing preventative measures and post-event steps that we will take in the event of an oil spill. We received the emergency plan approval and the emergency generator permit approval on April 30, 2003 and August 14, 2003, respectively. To date, no penalties or other sanctions have been imposed against us relating to these matters. We do not have sufficient information to assess our potential exposure to liability, if any, and no amounts have been accrued in the consolidated financial statements related to this contingency.

Recent Developments

Acquisition of San Francisco Station and Issuance of Series C Preferred Stock and Warrant

      On December 23, 2004, we completed the acquisition contemplated by the merger agreement, dated October 5, 2004, with Infinity Media Corporation (“Infinity”), Infinity Broadcasting Corporation of San Francisco (“Infinity SF”) and SBS Bay Area, LLC, our wholly-owned subsidiary (“SBS Bay Area”), pursuant to which Infinity SF merged with and into SBS Bay Area, the surviving entity. SBS Bay Area acquired all of the rights and obligations of Infinity SF, including the FCC licenses for radio station KRZZ-FM (formerly KBAA-FM), serving the San Francisco, California market and certain related assets.

      In connection with the closing of the merger transaction, we issued to Infinity (i) an aggregate of 380,000 shares of our Series C convertible preferred stock, $.002 par value per share (the “Series C preferred stock”), each of which is convertible at the option of the holder into twenty fully paid and non-assessable shares of our Class A common stock; and (ii) a warrant to purchase an additional 190,000 shares of our Series C preferred stock, exercisable at any time from December 23, 2004 until December 23, 2008, at an exercise price of $300.00 per share (the “Warrant”). Upon conversion, each share of our Series C preferred stock held by a holder will convert into twenty fully paid and non-assessable shares of our Class A common stock, which shares will be exempt from registration requirements of the Securities Act, as a transaction not involving a public offering. The shares of our Series C preferred stock issued at the closing of the merger are convertible into 7,600,000 shares of our Class A common stock, subject to adjustment, and the Series C preferred stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrant are convertible into an additional 3,800,000 shares of our Class A common stock, subject to adjustment.

      In connection with the closing of the merger transaction, we also entered into a registration rights agreement with Infinity, pursuant to which, following a period of one year (or earlier if we take certain actions), Infinity may instruct us to file up to three registration statements, on a best efforts basis, with the SEC providing for the registration for resale of the Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series C preferred stock.

Pending Sale of Los Angeles Stations

      On August 17, 2004, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with Styles Media Group, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (“Styles Media Group”), to sell the assets of our radio stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM, serving the Los Angeles, California market, for a cash purchase price of $120.0 million. In connection with this agreement, Styles Media Group made a non-refundable $6.0 million deposit on the purchase price. On February 18, 2005, Styles Media Group exercised its right under the agreement to extend the closing date until March 31, 2005 by releasing the deposit from escrow to us. Although we expect the sale

of the Los Angeles stations to be completed, there cannot be any assurance that such sale will be completed. If the proposed sale does not close, we will be unable to use the anticipated proceeds from such sale to reduce our debt.

      On August 17, 2004, Spanish Broadcasting System SouthWest, Inc. also entered into a time brokerage agreement with Styles Media Group pursuant to which Styles Media Group was permitted to begin broadcasting its programming on radio stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM beginning on September 20, 2004. The time brokerage agreement will terminate upon the closing under, or termination of, the asset purchase agreement.

Sale of San Francisco and Chicago Stations

      On September 24, 2004, we completed the sale of the assets of radio station KPTI-FM, serving the San Francisco, California market, to 3 Point Media – San Francisco, LLC (“Three Point Media”) for a cash purchase price of $30.0 million. The sale was made pursuant to the terms of an amended asset purchase agreement dated as of April 15, 2004 with Three Point Media.

      On November 30, 2004, we completed the sale of the assets of radio stations WDEK-FM, WKIE-FM and WKIF-FM, serving the Chicago, Illinois market, to Newsweb Corporation for a cash purchase price of $28.0 million. The sale was made pursuant to the terms of an asset purchase agreement dated as of July 26, 2004 with Newsweb Corporation.

Amendment to Senior Credit Facility

      On February 14, 2005, we entered into an amendment to our $135.0 million senior credit facility, dated October 30, 2003, with Lehman Commercial Paper Inc. as syndication agent and administrative agent and the several banks and other financial institutions or entities from time to time a party to the credit agreement to, among other things, permit the refinancing of our existing senior subordinated debt, repurchase our 9⁵/8% senior subordinated notes due 2009, repurchase up to $1.0 million of our outstanding capital stock for aggregate proceeds of up to $3.0 million and the issuance of new senior subordinated notes.

Industry Segments

      Radio broadcasting is our only operating segment.

Risk Factors

      You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and the other information in this report. These are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are not aware of or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected and the trading price of our common stock could decline.

Our substantial amount of debt could adversely affect our financial health.

      Our consolidated debt is substantial and we are highly leveraged, which could adversely affect our financial condition, limit our ability to grow and compete and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations relating to our registered 10³/4% Series B cumulative exchangeable redeemable preferred stock, par value $.01 per share and liquidation preference of $1,000 per share (the “Series B preferred stock”) and, if issued, our registered 10³/4% subordinated exchange notes due 2013 (the “Exchange Notes”). As of December 31, 2004, our ratio of total debt to last twelve months Consolidated EBITDA, as defined in our credit agreement, was

8.3 to 1.0. Our substantial level of debt could have several important consequences to the holders of our securities, including the following:

      Our ability to satisfy all of our debt obligations depends upon our future operating performance. Our operating performance will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. We believe that our operating cash flow will be sufficient to meet our operating expenses and to service our debt requirements as they become due. However, if we are unable to pay our debts, whether upon acceleration of our debt or in the ordinary course of business, we will be forced to pursue alternative strategies such as selling assets, restructuring our debt, or seeking additional equity capital. We cannot assure you that we can successfully complete any of these alternative strategies on satisfactory terms or that the approval of the FCC could be obtained on a timely basis, or at all, for the transfer of any of the stations’ licenses in connection with a proposed sale of assets.

We will require a significant amount of cash to service our debt and to make cash dividend payments under our Series B Preferred Stock. Our ability to generate cash depends on many factors, some of which are beyond our control.

      For the last twelve months ended December 31, 2004, we had net cash interest expense of $37.9 million as defined in our credit agreement. At December 31, 2004, our ratio of last twelve months Consolidated EBITDA to last twelve months net cash interest expense, as defined in the credit agreement, was approximately 1.5 to 1.0. Our net interest expense will increase when and if we exchange our Series B preferred stock for the Exchange Notes. If we acquire additional radio stations in the future, depending on the financing used to fund these acquisitions, our interest expense may increase as well. In addition, we will be required to pay dividends in cash on our Series B preferred stock after October 15, 2008.

      Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our debt, pay dividends in cash on our Series B preferred stock after October 15, 2008, repurchase our Series B preferred stock when, and if, we are required to do so and to fund necessary or desired capital expenditures and any future acquisitions, will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future. Our ability to satisfy our obligations, including making the payments described above, and to reduce our total indebtedness will depend upon our future operating performance and on economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors, many of which may be beyond our control.

      Based on our current level of operations, we believe that our cash flow from operations, cash on hand and available borrowings under our senior secured credit facilities will be adequate to meet our liquidity needs for the near future barring any unforeseen circumstances. We cannot assure you, however, that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or that future borrowings will be available to us under our senior secured credit facilities or otherwise in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our debt or to fund our other liquidity needs. We may need to refinance all or a portion of our debt on or before maturity. We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our debt, including our senior secured credit facilities, our

9⁵/8% senior subordinated notes due 2009 (“existing 9⁵/8% notes”) or the Exchange Notes, if issued, on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

Any acceleration of our debt or event of default would harm our business and financial condition.

      If there were an event of default under our or our subsidiaries’ indebtedness, including the senior secured credit facilities and our existing debt instruments, the holders of the affected indebtedness could elect to declare all of that indebtedness to be due and payable immediately, which in turn could cause some or all of our or our subsidiaries’ other indebtedness to become due and payable. We cannot assure you that we or our subsidiaries would have sufficient funds available, or that we or our subsidiaries would have access to sufficient capital from other sources, to repay the accelerated debt. Even if we or our subsidiaries could obtain additional financing, we cannot assure you that the terms would be favorable to us. Under the terms of our senior secured credit facilities and our existing debt instruments, if the amounts outstanding under our indebtedness were accelerated, our lenders would have the right to foreclose on their liens on substantially all of our and our subsidiaries’ assets (with the exception of our FCC licenses held by certain of our subsidiaries, because a grant of a security interest therein would be prohibited by law, and certain general intangibles and fixed assets under particular limited circumstances) and on the stock of our subsidiaries. As a result, any event of default under our material debt instruments could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Despite our current significant level of debt, we and our subsidiaries may still be able to incur substantially more debt, which, if increased, could further intensify the risks associated with our substantial leverage.

      We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. Although the terms of our senior secured credit facilities and debt instruments restrict our ability to incur additional debt, these restrictions are subject to a number of qualifications and exceptions and, under certain circumstances, debt incurred in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. If we or our subsidiaries incur additional debt, the related risks described above that we and our subsidiaries face could intensify.

The terms of our existing debt and our preferred stock impose or will impose restrictions on us that may adversely affect our business.

      The terms of our Series B preferred stock, our Series C preferred stock (together with the Series B preferred stock, the “Preferred Stock”), existing 9⁵/8% notes, senior secured credit facilities, and, if issued, the Exchange Notes contain covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to:

      The terms of the senior secured credit facilities also require us to maintain specified financial ratios and to satisfy certain financial condition tests. These covenants could materially and adversely affect our ability to finance our future operations or capital needs and to engage in other business activities that may be in our best interest. All of these covenants may restrict our ability to expand or to pursue our business strategies. Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by our future operating performance and economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors, many of which may be beyond our control. If one or more of these events occur, we cannot be sure that we will be able to comply with the covenants. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under one or more of our debt instruments.

      If an event of default occurs under the senior secured credit facilities or the indenture governing our existing 9⁵/8% notes, the lenders and/or the noteholders could elect to declare all amounts of debt outstanding, together with accrued interest, to be immediately due and payable. In addition, there are change of control provisions in the senior secured credit facilities, the indenture governing the existing 9⁵/8% notes, the certificates of designation governing our Series B preferred stock and the indentures that will govern our Exchange Notes, if issued, each of which would cause an acceleration of the applicable indebtedness and/or require us to make an offer to repurchase all of the applicable notes and/or Series B preferred stock in the event that we experience a change of control.

We may not have the funds or the ability to raise the funds necessary to repurchase our Series B preferred stock if holders exercise their repurchase right, or to finance the change of control offer required by our Series B preferred stock and the indenture that would govern our Exchange Notes, if issued.

      On October 15, 2013, each holder of Series B preferred stock will have the right to require us to redeem all or a portion of the Series B preferred stock at a purchase price of 100% of the liquidation preference thereof, plus all accumulated and unpaid dividends to the date of repurchase. In addition, if we experience certain kinds of changes of control as described in the certificate of designation creating the Series B preferred stock, subject to certain restrictions in our debt instruments we will be required to make an offer to purchase the Series B preferred stock for cash at a purchase price of 101% of the liquidation preference thereof, plus accumulated dividends. The source of funds for any such repurchases would be our available cash or cash generated from operations or other sources, including borrowings, sales of equity or funds provided by a new controlling person or entity. We cannot assure you that sufficient funds will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all, to repurchase all tendered Series B preferred stock or Exchange Notes, if issued, pursuant to these requirements. Our failure to offer to repurchase or to repurchase Series B preferred stock or Exchange Notes tendered, as the case may be, will result in a voting rights triggering event under the certificate of designation governing our Series B preferred stock or a default under the indenture that would govern our Exchange Notes, if issued, as the case may be. Such events could lead to a cross-default under our senior secured credit facilities and under the terms of our other existing debt. In addition, our senior secured credit facilities and our existing 9⁵/8% notes would either prohibit or effectively prohibit us from making any such required repurchases. The underlying change of control event could also trigger our obligation to offer to repurchase our existing 9⁵/8% notes at 101% of their principal amount. Prior to repurchasing our Series B preferred stock or Exchange Notes, if issued, on a change of control event, we must either repay outstanding debt under our senior secured credit facilities or obtain the consent of the lenders under those facilities and we may have to offer to repurchase our existing 9⁵/8% notes. If we do not obtain the required consents or repay our outstanding debt under our senior secured credit facilities, we would remain effectively prohibited from offering to repurchase our Series B preferred stock or Exchange Notes, if issued. Even if we are able to repay the senior secured credit facilities, if we have insufficient funds to purchase both our existing 9⁵/8% notes and our Series B preferred stock or Exchange Notes, if issued, we would remain effectively prohibited from offering to repurchase our Series B preferred stock or Exchange Notes, if issued.

We may not complete the proposed sale of our Los Angeles stations.

      On August 17, 2004, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with Styles Media Group to sell the assets of our radio stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM, serving the Los Angeles, California market, for a cash purchase price of $120.0 million. In connection with this agreement, Styles Media Group made a non-

refundable $6.0 million deposit on the purchase price. On February 18, 2005, Styles Media Group exercised its right under the agreement to extend the closing date until March 31, by releasing the deposit from escrow to us. Although we expect the sale of the Los Angeles stations to be completed, there cannot be any assurance that such sale will be completed. If the proposed sale does not close, we will be unable to use the anticipated proceeds from such sale to reduce our debt.

We are a holding company and depend entirely upon cash flow from our subsidiaries to meet our obligations.

      We conduct our business through our subsidiaries and have no operations of our own. Consequently, we will be dependent upon the cash flow of our subsidiaries and distributions from our subsidiaries to us in order to meet our debt obligations. The ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other payments or distributions to us will depend on their respective operating results and may be restricted by, among other things, the laws of their jurisdiction of organization, which may limit the amount of funds available for the payment of dividends, agreements of those subsidiaries, the terms of our senior secured credit facilities and other existing debt obligations and the covenants of any future outstanding indebtedness we or our subsidiaries incur.

We have experienced net losses in the past and, to the extent that we experience net losses in the future, our ability to raise capital and the market prices of our common stock may be adversely affected.

      We may not achieve sustained profitability. Failure to achieve sustained profitability may adversely affect the market price of our common stock, which in turn may adversely affect our ability to raise additional equity capital and to incur additional debt. Our inability to obtain financing in adequate amounts and on acceptable terms necessary to operate our business, repay our debt obligations or finance our proposed acquisitions could negatively impact our financial position and results of operations. We experienced a net loss for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 and December 29, 2002. Net income generated in fiscal year ended 2004 was directly attributed to gains realized from the sale of assets.

      Our interest expense will increase if we incur any additional indebtedness under our senior secured credit facilities. If we acquire additional radio stations in the future, depending on the financing used to fund these acquisitions, interest expense may increase as well.

We compete for advertising revenue with other radio broadcasters as well as television and other media, many operators of which have greater resources than we do.

      The success of our radio stations is primarily dependent upon their share of overall advertising revenues within their markets, especially in New York, Los Angeles and Miami. In addition, radio broadcasting is a highly competitive business. Our radio stations compete in their respective markets for audiences and advertising revenues with other radio stations of all formats, as well as with other media, such as newspapers, magazines, television, satellite radio, cable services, outdoor advertising, the Internet and direct mail. We anticipate that our radio stations may also compete with satellite-based radio services in the future. As a result of this competition, our stations’ audience ratings, market shares and advertising revenues may decline and any adverse change in a particular market could have a material adverse effect on the revenue of our stations located in that market and on the financial condition of our business as a whole.

      Although we believe that each of our radio stations is able to compete effectively in its respective market, we cannot assure you that any station will be able to maintain or increase its current audience ratings and advertising revenues. Radio stations can change formats quickly. Any other radio station currently broadcasting could shift its format to duplicate the format of, or develop a format which is more popular than, any of our stations. If a station converts its programming to a format similar to that of one of our stations, or if one of our competitors strengthens its operations, the ratings and station operating income of our station in that market could be adversely affected. In addition, other radio companies which are larger and have more resources may also enter markets in which we operate.

Cancellations or reductions in advertising could adversely affect our net revenues.

      We do not generally obtain long-term commitments from our advertisers. As a result, our advertisers may cancel, reduce or postpone orders without penalty. Cancellations, reductions or delays in purchases of advertising could adversely affect our net revenues, especially if we are unable to replace these purchases. Our expense levels are based, in part, on expected future net revenues and are relatively fixed once set. Therefore, unforeseen decreases in advertising sales could have a material adverse impact on our net revenues.

Our operating results could be adversely affected by a national or regional recession.

      Our operating results could be adversely affected by a recession and/or further downturn in the United States economy since advertising expenditures generally decrease as the economy slows down. In addition, our operating results in individual geographic markets could be adversely affected by local or regional economic downturns. Our operating results have been adversely affected by past recessions.

A large portion of our net revenue and operating income currently comes from our New York, Los Angeles and Miami markets.

      Our New York, Los Angeles and Miami markets accounted for more than 70% of our revenue for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. Therefore, any volatility in our revenues, net income (loss) or operating income attributable to stations in these markets could have a significant adverse effect on our consolidated net revenues, net income or operating expenses. A significant decline in net revenue or operating income from our stations in any of these markets could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

Loss of any of our key personnel could adversely affect our business.

      Our business depends upon the efforts, abilities and expertise of our executive officers and other key employees, including on-air talent, and our ability to hire and retain qualified personnel. The loss of any of these executive officers and key employees, particularly Raúl Alarcón, Jr., our Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President, could have a material adverse effect on our business. We do not maintain key man life insurance on any of our personnel.

Our growth depends on successfully executing our acquisition strategy.

      We have pursued, and will continue to pursue, the acquisition of radio stations, and other related media outlets, primarily in the largest U.S. Hispanic markets, as a growth strategy. We cannot assure you that our acquisition strategy will be successful. Our acquisition strategy is subject to a number of risks, including, but not limited to:

      In addition, we may finance acquisitions with the issuance of, or through sales of, our common stock in the public market which could adversely affect our stock price, due to dilution, and our ability to raise funds necessary to grow our business through additional stock offerings.

      Although we intend to pursue additional strategic acquisitions, our ability to do so is significantly restricted by the terms of the senior secured credit facilities, the indenture governing our existing 9⁵/8% notes, the certificates of designations governing our Preferred Stock, the indenture that will govern the Exchange Notes, if issued, and our ability to raise additional funds. Additionally, our competitors who have greater resources than we do will have an advantage over us in pursuing and completing strategic acquisitions.

Raúl Alarcón, Jr., our Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President, has majority voting control and this control may discourage or influence certain types of transactions, including an actual or potential change of control such as a merger or sale.

      Raúl Alarcón, Jr., our Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President, owns shares of common stock having approximately 80% of the combined voting power of our outstanding shares of common stock, as of the date of this annual report on Form 10-K. Accordingly, Mr. Alarcón, Jr. has the ability to elect all of our directors and can effectively control our policies and affairs. This control may delay, defer or discourage certain types of transactions involving an actual or potential change of control such as a merger or sale.

We must be able to respond to rapidly changing technology, services and standards which characterize our industry in order to remain competitive.

      The FCC is considering, or has implemented, ways to introduce new technologies to the radio broadcast industry, including satellite and terrestrial delivery of digital audio broadcasting, and the standardization of available technologies which significantly enhance the sound quality of AM and FM broadcasts. We cannot predict the effect new technology of this nature will have on our financial condition and results of operations. Several new media technologies are being developed, including the following:

Our business depends on maintaining our FCC licenses. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain these licenses.

      The domestic broadcasting industry is subject to extensive federal regulation which, among other things, requires approval by the FCC for the issuance, renewal, transfer and assignment of broadcasting station operating licenses and limits the number of broadcasting properties we may acquire. Federal regulations may create significant new opportunities for broadcasting companies but also create uncertainties as to how these regulations will be interpreted and enforced by the courts.

      Our success depends in part on acquiring and maintaining broadcast licenses issued by the FCC, which are typically issued for a maximum term of eight years and are subject to renewal. Our FCC licenses are next subject to renewal at various times in 2005 and 2006. While we believe that the FCC will approve applications for renewal of our existing broadcasting licenses when made, we cannot guarantee that pending or future renewal applications submitted by us will be approved, or that renewals will not include conditions or qualifications that could adversely affect our operations. Although we may apply to renew our FCC licenses, interested third parties may challenge our renewal applications. In addition, if we or any of our significant stockholders, officers, or directors violate the FCC’s rules and regulations or the Communications Act, or are

convicted of a felony or anti-trust violations, the FCC may commence a proceeding to impose sanctions upon us. Examples of possible sanctions include the imposition of fines, the revocation of our broadcasting licenses, or the renewal of one or more of our broadcasting licenses for a term of fewer than eight years. If the FCC were to issue an order denying a license renewal application or revoking a license, we would be required to cease operating the radio station covered by the license only after we had exhausted administrative and judicial review without success. Such an event would materially affect the carrying value of our intangible assets and would negatively impact our operating results. We currently account for our FCC licenses as an indefinite life asset, per SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (SFAS No. 142). In the event we are no longer able to conclude that our FCC license have indefinite lives, as defined in SFAS No. 142, we may be required to amortize such licenses. The amortization of our FCC licenses would by definition affect our earnings (losses) and earnings (losses) per share.

      The radio broadcasting industry is subject to extensive and changing federal regulation. Among other things, the Communications Act and FCC rules and policies limit the number of broadcasting properties that any person or entity may own (directly or by attribution) in any market and require FCC approval for transfers of control and assignments. The filing of petitions or complaints against us or any FCC licensee from which we acquire a station could result in the FCC delaying the grant of, or refusing to grant or imposing conditions on its consent to the assignment or transfer of licenses. The Communications Act and FCC rules also impose limitations on non-U.S. ownership and voting of our capital stock. Moreover, governmental regulations and policies may change over time and we cannot assure you that those changes would not have a material impact upon our business, financial position or results of operations.

The FCC has recently begun more vigorous enforcement of its indecency rules against the broadcast industry, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

      The FCC’s rules and regulations prohibit the broadcast of obscene material at any time and indecent material between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. The FCC in the last few years has stepped up its enforcement activities as they apply to indecency and has recently indicated that it is enhancing its enforcement efforts relating to the regulation of indecency. The FCC has threatened on more than one occasion to initiate license revocation or license renewal proceedings against a broadcast licensee who commits a “serious” indecency violation. Broadcasters risk violating the prohibition on the broadcast of indecent material because of the vagueness of the FCC’s definition of indecent material, coupled with the spontaneity of live programming. The FCC has also expanded the breadth of indecency regulation to include material that could be considered “blasphemy” “personally reviling epithets”, “profanity” and vulgar or coarse words amounting to a nuisance. Legislation has been introduced in Congress that would significantly increase the penalties for broadcasting indecent programming and depending on the number of violations engaged in, would potentially subject us to license revocation, renewal or qualifications proceedings in the event that we broadcast indecent material. In addition, the FCC’s heightened focus on the indecency regulatory scheme, against the broadcast industry generally, may encourage third parties to oppose our license renewal applications or applications for consent to acquire broadcast stations.

      We may in the future become subject to additional inquiries or proceedings related to our radio stations’ broadcast of indecent or obscene material. To the extent that these pending inquiries or other proceedings result in the imposition of fines, revocation of any of our radio station licenses or denials of license renewal applications, our results of operations and business could be materially adversely affected.

We may face regulatory review for additional acquisitions and divestitures in our existing markets and, potentially, acquisitions in new markets.

      An important part of our growth strategy is the acquisition of additional radio stations. Acquisitions and divestitures of radio stations by us are subject not only to obtaining FCC consent, but also to possible review by the U.S. Department of Justice (the “Justice Department”), which has become more aggressive in reviewing proposed acquisitions of radio stations and radio station networks. The Justice Department is particularly concerned when the proposed buyer already owns three or more radio stations in the market of the station it is seeking to buy. Recently, the Justice Department has challenged a number of radio broadcasting

transactions. Some of those challenges ultimately resulted in consent decrees requiring, among other things, divestitures of certain stations. In general, the Justice Department has more closely scrutinized radio broadcasting acquisitions that result in market shares in excess of 40% of local radio advertising revenue. Similarly, the FCC reviews proposed radio broadcasting transactions even if the proposed acquisition otherwise complies with the FCC’s ownership limitations. In particular, the FCC may invite public comment on proposed radio transactions that the FCC believes, based on its initial analysis, may present ownership concentration concerns in a particular local radio market.

The market price of our shares of Class A common stock may fluctuate significantly.

      Our Class A common stock has been publicly traded since November 1999. The market price for our Class A common stock has been subject to fluctuations since the date of our initial public offering. The stock market has from time to time experienced price and volume fluctuations, which have often been unrelated to the operating performance of the affected companies. We believe that the principal factors that may cause price fluctuations in our shares of Class A common stock are:

      We cannot assure you that the market price of our Class A common stock will not experience significant fluctuations in the future, including fluctuations that are adverse and unrelated to our operating performance.

Current or future sales by existing stockholders could depress the market price of our Class A common stock.

      The market price of our Class A common stock could drop as a result of sales of a large number of shares of Class A common stock or Class B common stock (convertible into Class A common stock) by our existing stockholders or the perception that these sales may occur. These factors could make it more difficult for us to raise funds through future offerings of our Class A common stock.

      Pursuant to our amended asset purchase agreement for the purchase of the assets of radio station KXOL-FM, we granted warrants to the International Church of the FourSquare Gospel (“ICFG”) from the date that ICFG ceased to broadcast its programming over KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM until the closing of the acquisition of KXOL-FM. On each of March 31, 2003, April 30, 2003, May 31, 2003, June 30, 2003, July 31, 2003, August 31, 2003 and September 30, 2003, we granted ICFG a warrant exercisable for 100,000 shares (an aggregate of 700,000 shares) of our Class A common stock at an exercise price of $6.14, $7.67, $7.55, $8.08, $8.17, $7.74 and $8.49 per share, respectively. The warrant issued on September 30, 2003 was the final warrant required to be issued due to the closing of the acquisition of KXOL-FM. These warrants are exercisable for a period of thirty-six months after the date of issuance after which they will expire if not exercised. To date, none of these warrants issued to ICFG have been exercised. If these warrants are exercised, we cannot assure you that this would not depress the market price of our Class A common stock.

      On December 23, 2004, in connection with the closing of the merger agreement, dated October 5, 2004, with Infinity, Infinity SF and SBS Bay Area, we issued to Infinity (i) an aggregate of 380,000 shares of our Series C preferred stock, each of which is convertible at the option of the holder into twenty fully paid and non-assessable shares of our Class A common stock; and (ii) a warrant to purchase an additional

190,000 shares of our Series C preferred stock, at an exercise price of $300.00 per share (the “Warrant”). Upon conversion, each share of our Series C preferred stock held by a holder will convert into twenty fully paid and non-assessable shares of our Class A common stock, which shares will be exempt from registration requirements of the Securities Act, as a transaction not involving a public offering. The shares of our Series C preferred stock issued at the closing of the merger are convertible into 7,600,000 shares of our Class A common stock, subject to adjustment, and the Series C preferred stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrant are convertible into an additional 3,800,000 shares of our Class A common stock, subject to adjustment. This Warrant is exercisable for a period of forty-eight months from the date of issuance after which it will expire if not exercised. To date, the Warrant that we have issued to Infinity has not been exercised. If the shares of Series C preferred stock are converted or if the Warrant is exercised, we cannot assure you that this would not depress the market price of our Class A common stock.

Our failure to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 could cause a loss of confidence in the reliability of our financial statements and could have a material adverse effect on our business and the price of our Class A common stock.

      We have undergone a comprehensive effort to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to Section 404, and the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC to implement Section 404, we are required to furnish a report by our management to include in our annual report on Form 10-K regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and a report by our independent registered public accounting firm addressing these assessments. This effort included documenting and testing our internal controls. As of December 31, 2004, we did not identify any material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting as defined by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. In future years, there can be no assurance that we will not have material weaknesses that would be required to be reported. If we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective in any future period (or if our independent registered public accounting firm were unable to express an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal controls), we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and the price of our Class A common stock.

Available Information

      We are subject to the reporting and other information requirements of the Exchange Act. We file reports and other information with the SEC. Such reports and other information filed by us pursuant to the Exchange Act may be inspected and copied at the public reference facility maintained by the SEC at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington D.C. 20549. If interested, please call 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. The SEC maintains a website on the Internet containing reports, proxy materials, information statements and other items. The Internet website address is http://www.sec.gov. Our reports, proxy materials, information statements and other information can also be inspected and copied at the offices of The Nasdaq Stock Market, on which our common stock is listed (symbol: SBSA). You can find more information about us at our Internet website located at www.spanishbroadcasting.com and our investor relations section of our website is located at www.spanishbroadcasting.com/investorinfo.shtml. Our annual report on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available free of charge on our Internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish such material to, the SEC.

      The types of properties required to support each of our radio stations include offices, broadcasting studios and transmission facilities where broadcasting transmitters and antenna equipment are located. Our corporate headquarters are located at 2601 South Bayshore Drive, PH II, Coconut Grove, Florida, where we rent executive offices in a building indirectly owned by Raúl Alarcón, Jr. The lease expires in 2010, with the right to renew for two consecutive five-year terms thereafter. The studios and offices of our Miami stations are

currently located in leased facilities, which are indirectly owned by Raúl Alarcón, Jr. and Pablo Raúl Alarcón, Sr., with lease terms that expire in 2012. We own the buildings housing the offices and studios in New York for WSKQ-FM and WPAT-FM, and in Los Angeles for KLAX-FM and KXOL-FM. We own the buildings housing our Puerto Rico offices and studios in Guaynabo, Puerto Rico and Mayagüez, Puerto Rico. We own the transmitter sites for five of our eleven stations in Puerto Rico. We also own a tower site in Signal Hill, California where we lease space to a public broadcast station and other members of the telecommunications industry. We lease all of our other transmitter sites, with lease terms that expire between 2005 and 2082, assuming all renewal options are exercised. We lease the office and studio facilities for our stations in Chicago and San Francisco and additional office space for our stations in New York and Puerto Rico.

      We have backup transmitter facilities in place for our New York stations WSKQ-FM and WPAT-FM in midtown Manhattan on the Four Times Square Building. We also have backup transmitter sites for KLAX-FM and KXOL-FM in Los Angeles, WLEY-FM in Chicago, WRMA-FM in Miami, KRZZ-FM in San Francisco and in San Juan, Puerto Rico for the five radio stations covering the San Juan metropolitan area. All of these sites are leased with the exception of Puerto Rico.

      These backup transmitter facilities are a large part of our disaster recovery plan to continue broadcasting to the public and to maintain our stations’ revenue streams in the event of a significant emergency. We are in the planning process of implementing backup studio and alternate origination points to maintain operations in the event of a studio-site outage or emergency.

      The studio and transmitter sites of our radio stations are vital to our overall operations. Management believes that our properties are in good condition and are suitable for our operations; however, we continually assess the need to upgrade our properties. We own substantially all the equipment used in our radio broadcasting business.

      See “Item 1. Business — Environmental Matters” and “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”

      From time to time we are involved in litigation incidental to the conduct of our business, such as contractual matters and employee-related matters. In the opinion of management, such litigation is not likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial position.

      On June 14, 2000, an action was filed in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit (the “Court”) in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida by Jose Antonio Hurtado against us, alleging that he was entitled to a commission related to an acquisition made by us. The case was tried before a jury during the week of December 1, 2003 and Mr. Hurtado was awarded the sum of $1.8 million, plus interest. Mr. Hurtado also filed an application for attorneys’ fees, which we opposed on grounds that there is no contractual or statutory basis for such an award. We filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, which was heard on February 6, 2004. On March 12, 2004, the Court denied our motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and, upon its own motion, the Court granted a new trial. On April 7, 2004, Mr. Hurtado filed a notice of appeal with the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, challenging the order granting a new trial, and on April 8, 2004, we filed a notice of cross-appeal, challenging the denial of our motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. On August 27, 2004, Mr. Hurtado filed his initial brief, and on January 10, 2005, we filed a combined response brief and initial brief on our cross-appeal. On March 7, 2005, Mr. Hurtado filed his reply brief and our reply brief is due 20 days thereafter. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has set this matter for oral argument on April 13, 2005. We have accrued for the $1.8 million award, plus interest, at December 31, 2004 and have recorded the amount in other expense (income), net, in the consolidated statement of operations in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.

      On November 28, 2001, a complaint was filed against us in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Southern District of New York”) and was amended on April 19, 2002. The amended complaint alleges that the named plaintiff, Mitchell Wolf, purchased shares of our Class A common stock pursuant to the October 27, 1999 prospectus and registration statement relating to our initial

public offering which closed on November 2, 1999. The complaint was brought on behalf of Mr. Wolf and an alleged class of similarly situated purchasers, against us, eight underwriters and/or their successors-in-interest who led or otherwise participated in our initial public offering, two members of our senior management team, one of whom is our Chairman of the Board, and an additional director, referred to collectively as the individual defendants. To date, the complaint, while served upon us, has not been served upon the individual defendants, and no counsel has appeared for them.

      This case is one of more than 300 similar cases brought by similar counsel against more than 300 issuers, 40 underwriter defendants, and 1,000 individuals alleging, in general, violations of federal securities laws in connection with initial public offerings, in particular, failing to disclose that the underwriter defendants allegedly solicited and received additional, excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors in exchange for which they allocated to those investors material portions of the restricted shares issued in connection with each offering. All of these cases, including the one involving us, have been assigned for consolidated pretrial purposes to one judge of the Southern District of New York. One of the claims against the individual defendants, specifically the Section 10b-5 claim, has been dismissed.

      In June of 2003, after lengthy negotiations, a settlement proposal was embodied in a memorandum of understanding among the investors in the plaintiff class, the issuer defendants and the issuer defendants’ insurance carriers. On July 23, 2003, our Board of Directors approved both the memorandum of understanding and an agreement between the issuer defendants and the insurers. As of March 1, 2004, the overwhelming majority of non-bankrupt issuer defendants have approved the settlement proposal. The principal components of the settlement include: 1) a release of all claims against the issuer defendants and their directors, officers and certain other related parties arising out of the alleged wrongful conduct in the amended complaint; 2) the assignment to the plaintiffs of certain of the issuer defendants’ potential claims against the underwriter defendants; and 3) a guarantee by the insurers to the plaintiffs of the difference between $1.0 billion and any lesser amount recovered by the plaintiffs against the underwriter defendants. The payments will be charged to each issuer defendant’s insurance policy on a pro rata basis.

      On February 15, 2005, the Southern District of New York granted preliminary approval to the proposed settlement agreement, subject to a narrowing of the proposed bar on underwriter and non-settling defendant claims against the issuer defendants to cover only contribution claims. The Court directed the parties to submit revised settlement documents consistent with its Opinion and scheduled a conference for March 18, 2005 in order to (a) make final determinations as to the form, substance and program of notice, and (b) schedule a Rule 23 fairness hearing. To date, the parties have not submitted the revised settlement documents. We do not have sufficient information to assess our potential exposure to liability, if any, and no amounts have been accrued in the consolidated financial statements.

      On December 5, 2003, Amigo Broadcasting, L.P. (“Amigo”) filed an original petition and application for temporary injunction in the District Court of Travis County, Texas (the “Court”), against us, Raul Bernal (“Bernal”) and Joaquin Garza (“Garza”), two of our former employees. Amigo filed a first and second amended petition and application for temporary injunction on June 25, 2004 and February 18, 2005, respectively. The second amended petition alleged that we (1) misappropriated Amigo’s proprietary interests by broadcasting the characters and concepts portrayed by the Bernal and Garza radio show (the “Property”), (2) wrongfully converted the Property to our own use and benefit, (3) induced Bernal and Garza to breach their employment agreements with Amigo, (4) used and continue to use Amigo’s confidential information and property with the intention of diverting profits from Amigo and of inducing Amigo’s potential customers to do business with us and our syndicators, (5) invaded Amigo’s privacy by misappropriating the name and likeness of Bernal and Garza, and (6) committed violations of the Lanham Act by diluting and infringing on Amigo’s trademarks. Based on these claims, Amigo seeks damages in excess of $3.0 million.

      On December 5, 2003, the Court issued a temporary injunction against all of the defendants and scheduled a hearing before the Court on December 17, 2003. The temporary injunction dissolved by its terms on December 1, 2004. On December 17, 2003, the parties entered into a settlement agreement, whereby the Court entered an Order on Consent of the settling parties, permitting Bernal and Garza’s radio show to be broadcast on our radio stations. In addition, we agreed that we would not broadcast the Bernal and Garza radio

show in certain prohibited markets and that we would not distribute certain promotional materials that were developed by Amigo. On January 5, 2004, we answered the remaining claims asserted by Amigo for damages. The parties have exchanged some written discovery and are in the process of scheduling depositions. The case is scheduled for a jury trial on May 23, 2005. We do not have sufficient information to assess our potential exposure to liability, if any, and no amounts have been accrued in the consolidated financial statements.

      See “Item 1. Business — Environmental Matters.”

      No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.

PART II

      Our Class A common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market’s National Market under the symbol “SBSA.” The tables below show, for the quarters indicated, the reported high and low bid quotes for our Class A common stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market’s National Market.

Holders

      As of March 14, 2005, there were approximately 58 record holders of our Class A common stock, par value $.0001 per share. There is no established trading market for our Class B common stock, par value $.0001 per share. As of March 14, 2005, there were 3 record holders of our Class B common stock. These figures do not include an estimate of the indeterminate number of beneficial holders whose shares may be held of record by brokerage firms and clearing agencies.

Dividend Policy

      We have not declared or paid any cash or stock dividends on any class of our common stock in the last two fiscal years. We intend to retain future earnings for use in our business and do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash or stock dividends on shares of our Class A or Class B common stock in the near future. In addition, any determination to declare and pay dividends will be made by our Board of Directors in light of our earnings, financial position, capital requirements and other factors that our Board of Directors deems relevant. Furthermore, the indentures governing our existing 9⁵/8% notes and our senior secured credit facilities contain restrictions on our ability to pay dividends.

      Under the terms of our Series B preferred stock, we are required to pay dividends at a rate of 10³/4% per year of the $1,000 liquidation preference per share of Series B preferred stock. From October 30, 2003 to

October 15, 2008, we may pay these dividends in either cash or additional shares of Series B preferred stock. After October 15, 2008, we will be required to pay the dividends on our Series B preferred stock only in cash.

      Under the terms of our Series C preferred stock, we are required to pay dividends on parity with our Class A common stock and Class B common stock and each other class or series of capital stock we create after December 23, 2004.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

      All sales of unregistered securities for the period covered by this annual report on Form 10-K have been previously reported by us on our current report on Form 8-K filed on October 12, 2004.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

      See “Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholders Matters — Equity Compensation Plan Information.”

SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

(In thousands, except ratios, shares outstanding and per share data)

      The following table sets forth the historical financial information of our business. The selected historical consolidated financial information presented below under the caption “Statement of Operations Data”, “Other Financial Data” and “Consolidated Balance Sheet Data,” as of and for each of the fiscal years in the two-year period ended September 30, 2001 and the three-month transitional period ended December 30, 2001 are derived from our historical audited consolidated financial statements but not included in this annual report on Form 10-K.

      Effective November 6, 2001, we changed our fiscal year end from the last Sunday in September of each calendar year to the last Sunday in December of each calendar year; therefore, we filed a transition report on Form 10-Q covering the transitional period from October 1, 2001 through December 30, 2001. Effective December 30, 2002, we again changed our fiscal year end from a broadcast calendar 52-53-week fiscal year ending on the last Sunday in December to a calendar year ending on December 31. Financial results for December 30 and 31, 2002 are included in our financial results for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.

      Our selected historical consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with our historical consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004, and for the fiscal years ended December 29, 2002, December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004, the related notes included in Item 15 of this report. For additional information see the financial section of this report and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

General Overview

      We are the largest Hispanic-controlled radio broadcasting company in the United States. After giving effect to the proposed sale of our radio stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM, serving the Los Angeles, California market, we will own and operate 20 radio stations in markets that reach approximately 49% of the U.S. Hispanic population. Our stations are located in six of the top-ten Hispanic markets of Los Angeles, New York, Puerto Rico, Chicago, Miami and San Francisco. Los Angeles and New York have the largest and second largest Hispanic populations, and are the largest and second largest radio markets in the United States in terms of advertising revenue, respectively. Our top three markets, based on net revenues, are New York, Los Angeles and Miami. As part of our operating business, we also operate LaMusica.com, a bilingual Spanish-English Internet website providing content related to Latin music, entertainment, news and culture.

      The success of each of our radio stations depends significantly upon its audience ratings and share of the overall advertising revenue within its market. The radio broadcasting industry is a highly competitive business, but some barriers to entry do exist. Each of our radio stations competes with both Spanish-language and English-language radio stations in its market, as well as with other advertising media such as newspapers, broadcast television, cable television, the Internet, magazines, outdoor advertising, transit advertising and direct mail marketing. Factors which are material to our competitive position include management experience, our radio station’s rank in its market, signal strength and frequency and audience demographics, including the nature of the Spanish-language market targeted by a particular station. Our top three markets, based on net revenue, are New York, Los Angeles and Miami. A significant decline in net revenue or station operating income from our stations in any of these markets could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

      Our primary source of revenue is the sale of advertising time on our radio stations to local and national advertisers. Our revenue is affected primarily by the advertising rates that our radio stations are able to charge, as well as the overall demand for radio advertising time in each respective market. Seasonal net broadcasting revenue fluctuations are common in the radio broadcasting industry and are due to fluctuations in advertising expenditures by local and national advertisers. Typically for the radio broadcasting industry, the first calendar quarter generally produces the lowest revenue. Our most significant operating expenses are compensation expenses, programming expenses, and advertising and promotional expenses. Our senior management strives

to control these expenses, as well as other expenses, by working closely with local station management and others, including vendors.

      Effective December 30, 2002, we changed our fiscal year end from a broadcast calendar 52-53-week fiscal year ending on the last Sunday in December to a calendar year ending on December 31. Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Financial Reporting Release No. 35, such change is not deemed a change in fiscal year for financial reporting purposes and we are not required to file a separate transition report or to report separate financial information for the two-day period of December 30 and 31, 2002. Financial results for December 30 and 31, 2002 are included in our financial results for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.

Fiscal Year Ended 2004 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended 2003

      The following summary table presents a comparison of our results of operations for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004. Various fluctuations illustrated in the table are discussed below. This section should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes.

      Net Revenue. The increase in net revenue was due to the double-digit growth in our Miami, Los Angeles and New York markets primarily due to network, local and national revenue. Additionally, the Chicago market had upper-single digit growth mainly from an increase in network and local revenue. We entered into two network revenue agreements in the fourth quarter of 2003, which have generated significant increases in network revenue.

      Engineering and Programming Expenses. The increase was mainly caused by the investments made in our Los Angeles and New York programming departments, compensation, transmitter rent and music license fees.

      Stock-Based Programming Expenses. In the fiscal year 2003, we granted ICFG seven warrants, each exercisable for 100,000 shares (an aggregate of 700,000 shares) of our Class A common stock with an aggregate fair market value of approximately $2.9 million. These warrants were issued under the terms of our amended time brokerage agreement with ICFG for KXOL-FM in exchange for broadcasting our programming on the station. The fair market value was based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model in accordance with SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS No. 123) and was recorded as a non-cash programming expense in the fiscal year ended 2003.

      Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. The increase was mainly caused by the increases in (a) compensation and benefits due to additional personnel in various markets, (b) expenses for promotional

events due to the increase in such events in New York, (c) provision for doubtful accounts due to the increase in revenue, (d) barter expense due to the increase in barter sales, and (e) professional fees related to our compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. These increases were offset by decreases in (a) local and national commissions due to lower commission structures and (b) cash advertising and promotions due to the use of barter.

      Corporate Expenses. The decrease in corporate expenses resulted mainly from a significant decrease in legal and professional fees related to the absence of various lawsuits and other legal matters of the prior year, offset by an increase in compensation due to additional personnel.

      Gain on sale of radio stations. On July 26, 2004, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with Newsweb Corporation to sell the assets of radio stations WDEK-FM, WKIE-FM and WKIF-FM serving the Chicago, Illinois market, for a cash purchase price of $28.0 million. On November 30, 2004, we completed the sale of the assets of the radio stations, which consisted of $21.3 million of intangible assets and $1.0 million of property and equipment. We recognized a gain of approximately $5.5 million, net of closing costs. We determined that the sale of these stations did not meet the criteria under SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of” (SFAS No. 144), to be classified as discontinued operations.

      Operating Income from Continuing Operations. The increase in operating income from continuing operations was primarily attributed to the increase in net revenues and decrease in stock-based programming expenses and corporate expenses and the gain on sale of stations.

      Interest Expense, Net. The increase in interest expense, net, was due to interest incurred on our $125.0 million senior secured credit facility term loan that was entered into on October 30, 2003.

      Income Taxes. The increase in income tax expense was due primarily to an increase in tax amortization of our FCC licenses related to the acquisition of KXOL-FM on October 30, 2003, which resulted in a corresponding increase in our valuation allowance for deferred tax assets related to continuing operations. Our effective book tax rate was impacted by the adoption of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (SFAS No. 142), on December 31, 2001. As a result of adopting SFAS No. 142, the reversal of our deferred tax liabilities related to our intangible assets could no longer be assured over our net operating loss carryforward period. Therefore, our effective book tax rate is impacted by a full valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets.

      Discontinued Operations, Net of Taxes. We determined that the sale of our KLEY-FM and KSAH-AM stations serving the San Antonio, Texas market, and the sale of our KPTI-FM station serving the San Francisco, California market, all met the criteria, in accordance with SFAS No. 144, to classify their respective operations as discontinued operations. Consequently, these stations’ results from operations for the fiscal years 2003 and 2004 have been classified as discontinued operations. The increase in discontinued operations, net of taxes, was primarily attributable to the $11.6 million gain recognized on the sale of our San Antonio KLEY-FM and KSAH-AM stations and the $16.6 million gain recognized on the sale of our San Francisco KPTI-FM station, net of closing costs and taxes, respectively.

      Net Income (Loss). The increase in net income was primarily due to the gain on the sales of radio stations and income from discontinued operations, and an increase in operating income from continuing operations, offset by increases in interest expense, net and income tax expense.

Fiscal Year Ended 2003 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended 2002

      The following summary table presents a comparison of our results of operations for the fiscal years ended December 29, 2002 and December 31, 2003. Various fluctuations illustrated in the table are discussed below. This section should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes.

      Net Revenue. The net revenue decrease was due to the decrease in barter revenue primarily related to the AOL Time Warner, Inc. (“AOL Time Warner”) barter agreement that concluded in August 2002. To provide better comparability on our net revenue, if the non-cash AOL Time Warner barter revenue of $6.4 million is excluded from the fiscal year 2002 results, “pro forma net revenue” actually increased by $6.0 million or 4.6%. This pro forma net revenue increase was due to the double-digit growth in our KLAX-FM and KXOL-FM stations, serving the Los Angeles market. In addition, the start-up FM stations in Chicago (WDEK, WKIE and WKIF) and Los Angeles (KZAB and KZBA), which began operating on January 6, 2003 and March 1, 2003, respectively, generated combined net revenue of $3.3 million. Offsetting these increases were decreases in our New York WSKQ-FM station mainly in national revenue and promotional events, as well as decreases in barter revenue in our core markets.

      Stock-Based Programming Expenses. We granted ICFG seven warrants, each exercisable for 100,000 shares (an aggregate of 700,000 shares) of our Class A common stock with an aggregate fair market value of approximately $2.9 million. These warrants were issued under the terms of our amended time brokerage agreement with ICFG for KXOL-FM in exchange for broadcasting our programming on the station. The fair market value was based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model in accordance with SFAS No. 123 and was recorded as a non-cash programming expense in the fiscal year ended 2003.

      Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. The decrease was primarily caused by the decrease in barter expense of $6.4 million related to the conclusion of the AOL Time Warner barter agreement in August 2002. This decrease was offset primarily by an increase in expenses attributed to the start-up FM stations in Chicago (WDEK, WKIE and WKIF) and Los Angeles (KZAB and KZBA), which had combined expenses totaling $2.6 million. Other expenses that increased were building expenses, provision for doubtful accounts and insurance.

      Corporate Expenses. The increase in corporate expenses resulted primarily from a significant increase in legal and professional fees related to various lawsuits and other legal matters in the fiscal year ended 2003.

      Operating Income from Continuing Operations. The decrease in operating income from continuing operations was primarily attributed to the increase in corporate expenses and stock-based programming expenses.

      Interest Expense, Net. The increase in interest expense, net, was primarily due to interest expense incurred on our new $125.0 million senior secured credit facility term loan that was entered into on October 30, 2003, interest expense on a lawsuit judgment and a decrease in interest income resulting from a general decline in interest rates on our cash balances.

      Other, Net. Other, net, was income of $1.1 million for the fiscal year ended 2003 due mostly to an insurance recovery for a claim related to our New York transmitting facilities and operations, offset by a legal judgment related to a commission for an acquisition. Other, net, was an expense of $0.7 million for the fiscal year ended 2002 due primarily to a legal judgment involving compensation for executive services and related services, which was offset by an insurance recovery for a claim related to the New York transmitting facilities.

      Income Taxes. The income tax expense of $11.3 million for the fiscal year ended 2003 was primarily due to an increase in our valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets. Our effective book tax rate was impacted by the adoption of SFAS No. 142 on December 31, 2001. As a result of adopting SFAS No. 142, the reversal of our deferred tax liabilities related to our intangible assets could no longer be assured over our net operating loss carryforward period. Therefore, our effective book tax rate reflects a full valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets. Income tax expense for the fiscal year ended 2002 consisted primarily of a $55.4 million non-cash charge to income tax expense to establish a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, effective December 31, 2001. Additionally, we recorded an income tax expense of $11.6 million based on the effective book tax rate for the 2002 fiscal year, offset by a $13.9 million non-cash income tax benefit due to a reduction of a portion of our valuation allowance on our deferred taxes, determined in accordance with SFAS No. 109 and available information. Excluding the fiscal year 2002 non-cash income tax expense of $55.4 million and non-cash income tax benefit of $13.9 million, as adjusted income tax expense decreased $0.3 million or 2.6% from $11.6 million to $11.3 million due to a decrease in current foreign income taxes expense.

      Discontinued Operations, Net of Taxes. We determined that the pending sales of our KLEY-FM and KSAH-AM stations serving the San Antonio, Texas market, KPTI-FM station serving the San Francisco, California market, and the sale of our KTCY-FM station serving the Dallas, Texas market, all met the criteria in accordance with SFAS No. 144, to classify their operations as discontinued operations. Consequently, these stations’ results from operations for the fiscal years 2003 and 2002 have been classified as discontinued operations. On August 23, 2002, we sold KTCY-FM’s assets held for sale consisting of intangible assets and property and equipment and recognized a gain of approximately $1.8 million, net of closing costs and taxes.

      Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle, Net of Taxes. There was no cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for the fiscal year ended 2003. Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of taxes, was $45.3 million for the fiscal year ended 2002. We adopted SFAS No. 142, effective December 31, 2001, which eliminated the amortization of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives and changed the method of determining whether there is a goodwill or intangible assets impairment from an undiscounted cash flow method to an estimated fair value method. As a result of the adoption of this standard, we incurred a non-cash transitional charge of $45.3 million, net of income tax benefit.

      Net Loss. The net loss for the fiscal year ended 2002 was impacted due to the adoption of SFAS No. 142, which resulted in the $55.4 million non-cash charge to establish a valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets and the non-cash charge of $45.3 million related to the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of income tax benefit. Excluding the fiscal year ended 2002 non-cash income tax expense of $55.4 million, income tax benefit of $13.9 million and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of $45.3 million, “as adjusted net loss,” increased $5.7 million from a net loss of $3.0 million to $8.7 million. The increase in the as adjusted net loss was due primarily to a decrease in pre-tax income primarily due to the decrease in operating income from continuing operations and increase in interest expense.

      The following table presents adjusted financial results for the fiscal years ended December 29, 2002 and December 31, 2003, respectively, adjusting for the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle and the increase in the income tax valuation allowance upon the adoption of SFAS No. 142 on December 31, 2001.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

      Our primary source of liquidity is cash on hand and cash provided by operations and, to the extent necessary, undrawn commitments that are available under a $10.0 million revolving credit facility. Our ability to raise funds by increasing our indebtedness is limited by the terms of the indentures governing our senior subordinated notes, the certificates of designations governing our preferred stock and the credit agreement governing our senior secured credit facilities. Additionally, the indentures, certificates of designations and credit agreement each place restrictions on us with respect to the sale of assets, liens, investments, dividends, debt repayments, capital expenditures, transactions with affiliates and consolidations and mergers, among other things. We had cash and cash equivalents of $45.6 million and $132.0 million as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively. If interest rates remain favorable, we may pursue the refinancing of our 9⁵/8% senior subordinated notes due 2009, using cash on hand and proceeds from the sale of assets. There can be no assurance that we will be able to refinance our 9⁵/8% senior subordinated notes due 2009 or on terms that are acceptable to us.

      The following summary table presents a comparison of our capital resources for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, with respect to certain of our key measures affecting our liquidity. The changes set forth in the table are discussed below. This section should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes.

      Net Cash Flows Provided By Operating Activities. Changes in our net cash flows from operating activities were primarily a result of the increase in cash paid to vendors, suppliers and employees, which caused the decreases in working capital balances, offset by an increase in cash received from customers.

      Net Cash Flows (Used In) Provided by Investing Activities. Changes in our net cash flows from investing activities were primarily a result of the proceeds received from the sale of radio stations KLEY-FM and KSAH-AM in January 2004, KPTI-FM in September 2004 and WDEK-FM, WKIE-FM and WKIF-FM in November 2004. Cash used in investing activities in 2003 was due to the acquisition of radio stations made in 2003.

      Net Cash Flows Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities. Changes in our net cash flows from financing activities were primarily a result of the additional offering costs related to our Series B preferred stock, financing costs and the principal payment made on our senior secured credit facility term loan. Cash provided by financing activities in 2003 related to proceeds from the senior secured credit facility and Series B preferred stock offering on October 30, 2003.

      The following summary table presents a comparison of our capital resources for the fiscal years ended December 29, 2002 and December 31, 2003, with respect to certain of our key measures affecting our liquidity. The changes set forth in the table are discussed below. This section should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes.

      Net Cash Flows Provided By Operating Activities. Changes in our net cash flows from operating activities were primarily a result of the increase in cash receipts from customers, driven by an increase in net revenue from our Los Angeles market, start-up FM stations and improved collection efforts, offset by an increase in cash paid to vendors, suppliers and employees. Cash payment to suppliers, vendors and employees increased during fiscal year ended 2003 primarily due to an increase in corporate expenses.

      Net Cash Flows Provided By (Used In) Investing Activities. Changes in our net cash flows from investing activities from fiscal years 2002 to 2003 were primarily a result of acquisitions of radio stations made in 2003.

      Net Cash Flows (Used In) Provided By Financing Activities. Changes in our net cash flows from financing activities from fiscal years 2002 to 2003 were primarily a result of the financing of the acquisition of the Los Angeles station KXOL-FM. To finance KXOL-FM, on October 30, 2003 we sold $75.0 million of 10³/4% Series A cumulative exchangeable redeemable preferred stock through a Rule 144A offering and entered into a $125.0 senior secured credit facility term loan, which resulted in combined net proceeds of $192.3 million.

      Management believes that cash from operating activities, together with cash on hand, should be sufficient to permit us to meet our operating obligations in the foreseeable future, including required interest and quarterly principal payments pursuant to the credit agreement governing our senior secured credit facilities, interest payment requirements under our 9⁵/8% senior subordinated notes due 2009 and capital expenditures, excluding the acquisitions of FCC licenses. Assumptions (none of which can be assured) which underlie management’s beliefs, include the following:

      Our strategy is to primarily utilize cash flows from operations to meet our capital needs and contractual obligations. However, we also have bank borrowings available to meet our capital needs and contractual obligations and, when appropriate and if available, will obtain financing by issuing debt or stock.

      We are required to maintain financial covenant ratios under the credit agreement governing our senior secured credit facilities as follows: (i) Consolidated EBITDA minimum, (ii) Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, (iii) Consolidated Leverage Ratio, (iv) Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio and (v) Consolidated Senior Secured Debt Ratio, all as defined in the credit agreement, solely for the purpose of determining compliance with the covenants. The credit agreement governing our senior secured credit facilities requiring compliance with these financial covenants states that the calculations must be based on Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America. We are in compliance with all covenants under our senior secured credit facilities and all other debt instruments as of December 31, 2004 and expect to be in compliance in the foreseeable future.

      On August 17, 2004, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with Styles Media Group to sell the assets of our radio stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM, serving the Los Angeles, California market, for a cash purchase price of $120.0 million. In connection with this agreement, Styles Media Group made a non-refundable $6.0 million deposit on the purchase price. On February 18, 2005, Styles Media Group exercised its right under the agreement to extend the closing date until March 31, by releasing the deposit from escrow to us. Although we expect the sale of the Los Angeles stations to be completed, there cannot be any assurance that such sale will be completed. If the proposed sale does not close, we will be unable to use the anticipated proceeds from such sale to reduce our debt.

      On August 17, 2004, Spanish Broadcasting System SouthWest, Inc. also entered into a time brokerage agreement with Styles Media Group pursuant to which Styles Media Group was permitted to begin broadcasting its programming on radio stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM beginning on September 20, 2004. The time brokerage agreement will terminate upon the closing under, or termination of, the asset purchase agreement.

      Pursuant to the credit agreement governing our senior secured credit facilities, the net cash proceeds received from these sales, when and if completed, must be offered to the noteholders to repay our borrowings under the senior credit facilities. Therefore, we reclassified the balance due on the senior credit facilities from long-term debt to current debt.

      We continuously review opportunities to acquire additional radio stations and sell non-core radio stations, primarily in the largest Hispanic markets in the United States. We engage in discussions regarding potential acquisitions from time to time in the ordinary course of business. Except as discussed above, we currently have

no other written understandings, letters of intent or contracts to acquire radio stations or other companies. We anticipate that any future acquisitions would be financed through funds generated from permitted debt financing, equity financing, operations, asset sales or a combination of these sources. However, there can be no assurance that financing from any of these sources, if necessary and available, can be obtained on favorable terms for future acquisitions.

Contractual Obligations

      The following table summarizes our principal and interest contractual obligations at December 31, 2004 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods ($ in thousands):

      We have contingencies that are deemed not reasonably likely and thus not included in the above contractual obligation table. See Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion.

      Our strategy is to primarily utilize cash flows from operations to meet our capital needs and contractual obligations. However, we also have bank borrowings available to meet our capital needs and contractual obligations and, when appropriate and if available, will obtain financing by issuing debt or common stock.

      As of December 2003, we are required to maintain financial covenants under the credit agreement governing our senior secured credit facilities as follows: (i) Consolidated EBITDA minimum, (ii) Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, (iii) Consolidated Leverage Ratio, (iv) Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio and (v) Consolidated Senior Secured Debt Ratio, all as defined in the credit agreement solely for the purpose of determining compliance with the covenants. The credit agreement requiring compliance with these financial covenants states that the calculations must be based on Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America. We are in compliance with all covenants under our senior secured credit facilities and all other debt instruments as of December 31, 2004 and expect to be in the foreseeable future.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

      We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Critical Accounting Policies

      The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could ultimately differ from those estimates. The following accounting policies require significant management judgments, assumptions and estimates.

Accounting for Intangible Assets

      Our indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of FCC broadcast licenses. FCC licenses are granted to radio stations for up to eight years under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the “Act”). The Act requires the FCC to renew a broadcast license if: (i) it finds that the station has served the public interest, convenience and necessity; (ii) there have been no serious violations of either the Communications Act of 1934 or the FCC’s rules and regulations by the licensee; and (iii) there have been no other serious violations, which taken together, constitute a pattern of abuse. We intend to renew our licenses indefinitely and evidence supports our

ability to do so. Historically, there has been no compelling challenge to our license renewals. In addition, the technology used in broadcasting is not expected to be replaced by another technology any time in the foreseeable future.

      In accordance with SFAS No. 142, we do not amortize our FCC licenses. We test these indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually or when an event occurs that may indicate that impairment may have occurred. We utilize independent valuations to determine the fair value of the FCC licenses, as deemed necessary. These valuations principally use the discounted cash flow methodology. This income approach consists of a quantitative model, which assumes the FCC licenses are acquired and operated by a third-party. This income approach incorporates variables such as types of signals, media competition, audience share, market advertising revenue, market revenue projections, anticipated operating profit margins and various discount rates. In the preparation of the FCC license appraisals, management and an independent valuation firm make estimates and assumptions that affect the valuation of the intangible asset. These estimates and assumptions could differ from actual results.

      We generally test for impairment on our FCC license intangible assets at the individual license level. However, we have applied the guidance in EITF 02-07, “Unit of Accounting for Testing Impairment of Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets” (EITF 02-07), to certain of our FCC license intangible assets. EITF 02-07 states that separately recorded indefinite-lived intangible assets should be combined into a single unit of accounting for purposes of testing impairment if they are operated as a single asset and, as such, are essentially inseparable from one another. We aggregate FCC licenses for impairment testing if their signals are simulcast and are operating as one revenue-producing asset.

      Our “goodwill” consists of the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible net assets acquired in business combinations, when a “business” has been acquired under the applicable accounting literature. SFAS No. 142 requires us to test goodwill for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level in lieu of being amortized. We have determined that we have one reporting unit under SFAS No. 142 because all of our operating units have similar economic characteristics.

      The goodwill impairment test is a two-step test. Under the first step, the fair value of the reporting unit is compared with its carrying value (including goodwill). If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an indication of goodwill impairment exists for the reporting unit, accordingly, the enterprise must perform step two of the impairment test (measurement).

      We adopted SFAS No. 142 in fiscal year 2002 and recorded a non-cash charge for the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of $45.3 million, net of income tax benefit of $30.2 million. During the fourth quarter of the fiscal years ended 2003 and 2004, we performed an annual impairment review of our indefinite-life intangible assets and determined that there was no impairment of intangible assets and goodwill.

Accounting for Income Taxes

      The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires us to estimate our actual current tax exposure together with our temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for book and tax accounting. These temporary differences result in the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in our consolidated balance sheet. SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” requires the establishment of a valuation allowance to reflect the likelihood of the realization of deferred tax assets. Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. We evaluate the weight of all available evidence to determine whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized. As a result of adopting SFAS No. 142 on December 31, 2001, amortization of intangible assets and goodwill ceased for financial statement purposes. As a result, we could not be assured that the reversals of the deferred tax liabilities relating to those intangible assets and goodwill would occur within our net operating loss carry-forward period. Therefore, on the date of adoption, we recognized a non-cash charge totaling $55.4 million to income tax expense to establish a valuation allowance for the full amount of our deferred tax assets due to uncertainties surrounding our ability to utilize some or all of our deferred tax assets, primarily consisting of net operating losses, as well as other temporary differences

between book and tax accounting. We expect to continue to reserve for any increase in our deferred tax assets in the foreseeable future. If the realization of deferred tax assets in the future is considered more likely than not, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would increase net income in the period such determination is made. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or we adjust these estimates in future periods, we may need to adjust our valuation allowance, which could materially affect our financial position and results of operations.

Valuation of Accounts Receivable

      We review accounts receivable to determine which accounts are doubtful of collection. In making the determination of the appropriate allowance for doubtful accounts, we consider our history of write-offs, relationships with our customers and the overall creditworthiness of our customers. For the years ended December 29, 2002, December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004, we incurred bad debt expense (recovery) of $(0.1) million, $0.3 million and $1.5 million, respectively. Changes in the credit worthiness of customers, general economic conditions and other factors may impact the level of future write-offs.

Revenue Recognition

      We recognize broadcasting revenue as advertisements are aired on our radio stations, subject to meeting certain conditions such as persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, a fixed and determinable price, and reasonable assurance of collection. Agency commissions, where applicable, are calculated based on a stated percentage applied to gross billing revenue. Advertisers remit the gross billing amount to the agency and the agency remits gross billings, less their commission, to us when the advertisement is not placed directly by the advertiser. Payments received in advance of being earned are recorded as customer advances.

Contingencies and Litigations

      We are currently involved in certain legal proceedings and, as required, have accrued our estimate of the probable costs for the resolution of these claims. These estimates have been developed in consultation with counsel and are based upon an analysis of potential results, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies. It is possible, however, that future results of operations for any particular period could be materially affected by changes in our assumptions or the effectiveness of our strategies related to these proceedings.

Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change

      In July 2001, FASB issued SFAS No. 142, which requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives no longer be amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142. We have concluded that our intangible assets, comprised primarily of FCC licenses, qualify as indefinite-life intangible assets under SFAS No. 142.

      We adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 142 effective December 31, 2001. After performing the transitional impairment evaluation of our indefinite-life intangible assets, we determined that the carrying value of certain indefinite-life intangible assets acquired from AM/ FM Inc. in January 2000, and certain indefinite-life intangible assets acquired from Rodriguez Communications, Inc. and New World Broadcasters Corp., in November 2000, exceeded their respective fair market values. Fair market values of our FCC licenses were determined through the use of a third-party valuation firm. These valuations were performed on the FCC licenses, which exclude the franchise values of the stations (i.e., going concern value). These valuations were based on a discounted cash flow model incorporating various market assumptions and types of signals, and assumed the FCC licenses were acquired and operated by a third-party. As a result, we recorded a non-cash charge for the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of $45.3 million, net of income tax benefit of $30.2 million. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill is deemed to be impaired if the net book value of the reporting unit exceeds our estimated fair value. We have determined that we have one reporting unit under SFAS No. 142 and that there was no impairment of goodwill as a result of adopting SFAS No. 142.

      Additionally, since amortization of our indefinite-life intangible assets ceased for financial statement purposes under SFAS No. 142, we could not be assured that the reversals of the deferred tax liabilities relating to those indefinite-life intangible assets would occur within our net operating loss carry-forward period. Therefore, on December 31, 2001, we recognized a non-cash charge totaling $55.4 million to income tax expense to establish a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, primarily consisting of net operating loss carry-forwards.

      As of our adoption of SFAS No. 142 effective December 31, 2001, we had unamortized goodwill in the amount of $32.7 million and unamortized identifiable intangible assets in the amount of $543.2 million, all of which was subjected to the transition provision of SFAS No. 142. The following table presents adjusted financial results for the fiscal years ended December 29, 2002, December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004, respectively, on a basis consistent with the new accounting principle.

      We performed an annual impairment review of our indefinite-life intangible assets and goodwill during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended 2004 and determined that there was no impairment of intangible assets and goodwill.

New Accounting Pronouncements

      In December 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS No. 123R), a revision of SFAS No. 123. SFAS No. 123R requires companies to expense the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees and is effective for interim or annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. In accordance with the revised statement, we will be required to recognize the expense attributable to stock options granted or vested subsequent to June 30, 2005. We are evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 123R. We have not yet determined the method of adoption or the effect of adopting SFAS No. 123R, and we have not determined whether the adoption will result in amounts that are similar to the current pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123R in Note 12(d) to our consolidated financial statements.

      In December 2003, FASB issued a revised Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51” (FIN 46R). FIN 46R requires the consolidation of entities in which an enterprise absorbs a majority of the entity’s expected losses, receives a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns, or both, as a result of ownership, contractual or other financial interests in the entity. Currently, entities are generally consolidated by an enterprise when it has a controlling financial interest through ownership of a majority voting interest in the entity. The provisions of FIN 46R are generally effective for existing (prior to February 1, 2003) variable interest relationships of a public entity no later than the end of the first reporting period that ends after March 15, 2004. However, prior to the required application of this interpretation, a public entity that is not a small business issuer shall apply FIN 46R to those entities that are considered to be special-purpose entities no later than the end of the first reporting period that ends after December 15, 2003. The adoption of FIN 46R did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

      We believe that inflation has not had a material impact on our results of operations for each of our fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004. However, there can be no assurance that future inflation would not have an adverse impact on our operating results and financial condition.

      Our primary market risk is a change in interest rates. Our primary exposure is variable rates of interest associated with borrowings under our senior secured credit facilities. Advances under the senior secured credit facilities bear base rate or Eurodollar rate interest (in each case subject to applicable margins), as applicable, which vary in accordance with prevailing economic conditions. Our earnings are affected by changes in interest rates due to the impact those changes have on interest expense from variable-rate debt instruments and on interest income generated from our cash and investment balances. At December 31, 2004, all of our debt, other than our $123.8 million senior secured credit facility term loan, had fixed interest rates. If variable interest rates average 10% higher in 2005 than they did during 2004, our variable interest expense would increase by approximately $0.6 million, compared to approximately $6.0 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. If interest rates average 10% lower in 2005 than they did during 2004, our interest income from cash and investment balances would decrease by approximately $0.1 million, compared to approximately $0.8 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. These amounts are determined by considering the impact of the hypothetical interest rates on our variable-rate debt, cash equivalents and short-term investment balances at December 31, 2004.

      The information called for by this Item 8 is included in Item 15, under “Financial Statements” and “Financial Statement Schedule” appearing at the end of this annual report on Form 10-K.

      There have been no changes in our independent registered public accounting firm or disagreements between us and our independent registered public accounting firm on accounting or financial disclosure during our two most recent fiscal years or any subsequent interim period.

      Evaluation Of Disclosure Controls And Procedures. Our principal executive and financial officers have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-14(c) of the Exchange Act to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in such reports is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive and

financial officers concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at December 31, 2004, and during the period prior to and including the date of this report.

      Changes In Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

      We, as members of management of Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (the “Company”) are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

      Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting, no matter how well designed, may not prevent or detect misstatements and can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to the financial statement preparation and presentation even when those systems are determined to be effective. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.

      We, under the supervision of and with the participation of our management, assessed the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). As a result of this assessment we concluded that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on the specified COSO criteria.

      Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, a copy of which is included in this annual report on Form 10-K.

Date: March 16, 2005

/s/ Raúl Alarcón, Jr.

Name: Raúl Alarcón, Jr.

            Chief Executive Officer and President

/s/ Joseph A. García

Name: Joseph A. García

Title:   Chief Financial Officer,

            Executive Vice President and

            Secretary

Item 9B.     Other Information

      None.

PART III

      The following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of our directors, executive officers and certain key employees as of December 31, 2004. Each of our directors and officers serves until his successor is elected and qualified.

      Raúl Alarcón, Jr. joined us in 1983 as an account executive and has been our President and a director since October 1985 and our Chief Executive Officer since June 1994. On November 2, 1999, Mr. Alarcón, Jr. became our Chairman of the Board of Directors and continues as our Chief Executive Officer and President. Currently, Mr. Alarcón, Jr. is responsible for our long-range strategic planning and operational matters and is instrumental in the acquisition and related financing of each of our radio stations. Mr. Alarcón, Jr. is the son of Pablo Raúl Alarcón, Sr.

      Pablo Raúl Alarcón, Sr. is our founder and was our Chairman of the Board of Directors from March 1983 until November 2, 1999, when he became Chairman Emeritus. Mr. Alarcón, Sr. continues to be one of our directors. Mr. Alarcón, Sr. has been involved in Spanish-language radio broadcasting since the early 1950’s when he established his first radio station in Camagüey, Cuba. Upon his arrival in the United States, Mr. Alarcón, Sr. continued his career in radio broadcasting and was an on-air personality for a New York radio station before being promoted to programming director. Mr. Alarcón, Sr. subsequently owned and operated a recording studio and an advertising agency before purchasing our first radio station in 1983. Mr. Alarcón, Sr. is Raúl Alarcón, Jr.’s father.

      Joseph A. García has been our Chief Financial Officer since 1984, Executive Vice President since 1996 and Secretary since November 2, 1999. Mr. García is responsible for our financial affairs, day-to-day operational matters and investor relations, and he has been instrumental in the acquisition and related financing of our radio stations. Before joining us in 1984, Mr. García spent thirteen years in international financial planning positions with Philip Morris Companies, Inc. and Revlon, Inc., where he was manager of financial planning for Revlon — Latin America.

      Marko Radlovic became our Chief Revenue Officer on December 1, 2003. Mr. Radlovic is responsible for overseeing the revenue performance of all of our local, national and network sales efforts. Mr. Radlovic was Vice President/General Manager for our Los Angeles radio cluster from January 2002 until November 2003 and previously served as Vice President of Sales for the Los Angeles cluster. Prior to joining us, he was Market Manager for CUMULUS Media in Southern California from January 2001 until August 2001 and was Vice President/General Manager for AM/FM Inc. in Los Angeles from October 1998 to October 2000.

      William B. Tanner has served as our Executive Vice President of Programming since August 31, 2000. Mr. Tanner is responsible for the programming of our stations as well as maintaining and improving their ratings. Prior to joining us, Mr. Tanner was the Vice President of Programming at Hispanic Broadcasting Corporation for six years. Mr. Tanner began his career in the radio broadcasting industry as an on-air personality and radio programmer.

      Dan Mason became one of our directors on July 10, 2003. Mr. Mason, a veteran of the radio broadcasting industry with nearly 30 years of experience, was most recently President of Infinity Radio from 1999 to 2002 and President of CBS Radio from 1995 to 1999. Mr. Mason currently serves as a consultant to various companies in the radio broadcasting industry. Besides his tenure at Infinity Radio and CBS Radio, Mr. Mason also served as President of Group W Radio and Cook Inlet Radio Partners, L.P.

      Antonio S. Fernandez became one of our directors on June 30, 2004. Mr. Fernandez was the founder and former head of the International Investment Banking Department at Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. Mr. Fernandez’s tenure at Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. from 1979 to 1999 also included terms as Executive Vice President, Director of Operations, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Director. He has been a member of the investment committees for several private equity funds and a director of a closed end fund. Earlier in his career, Mr. Fernandez held management positions at Electronic Data Systems, duPont Glore Forgan and Thomson McKinnon. Mr. Fernandez served on the board of directors of Banco Latinoamericano de Exportaciones from 1992 until 1999 and in September 2003 was elected to the board of directors of Terremark Worldwide Inc.

      Jose A. Villamil became one of our directors on June 30, 2004. Mr. Villamil has over 25 years of experience as a private business economist and as a senior policymaker of both the federal and State of Florida governments. Mr. Villamil is the Chief Executive Officer of The Washington Economics Group, Inc., serving in such position from 1993 to 1998 and from 2000 to the present. From 1999 to 2000, he was Director for Tourism, Trade and Economic Development of Florida. Mr. Villamil is also Chairperson of the Governor’s Council of Economic Advisors and a member of the board of directors of Enterprise Florida, Inc. Since April 2003, Mr. Villamil has been director of CommerceBank, N.A. and CommerceBank Holding Corp. Most recently, Mr. Villamil was appointed to President George W. Bush’s Transition Advisory Committee on U.S. Commercial and Trade Policies. From 1989-1993, Mr. Villamil served as Chief Economist and later as Undersecretary for Economic Affairs at the United States Department of Commerce.

      Jason L. Shrinsky became one of our directors on November 2, 1999. Mr. Shrinsky is a partner of the law firm Kaye Scholer LLP, where he has been a partner since 1986. Mr. Shrinsky has been a lawyer counseling corporations and high net worth individuals on financings, mergers and acquisitions, other related financial transactions and regulatory procedures since 1964. Kaye Scholer LLP has served as our legal counsel for more than 20 years.

      See “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

      Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities (collectively, “Reporting Persons”) to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of our securities with the SEC. Reporting Persons are required by the SEC to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

      Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received or written representations from the Reporting Persons, we believe that, with respect to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, all the Reporting Persons complied with all applicable filing requirements, except that one report covering one transaction by Joseph A. García was filed late. In addition, we believe that two reports covering two separate transactions by Marko Radlovic in fiscal year 2003 were filed late.

Code of Ethics

      We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (“Code of Ethics”) within the meaning of Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K. This Code of Ethics applies to our employees, officers and directors and is publicly available on our Internet website at www.spanishbroadcasting.com. If we make substantive amendments to this Code of Ethics or grant any waiver from its provisions to our principal executive, financial or accounting officers, or persons performing similar functions, including any implicit waiver, we will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on our website or in a current report on Form 8-K within five days of such amendment or waiver.

Composition of the Audit Committee; Audit Committee Financial Expert

      We have a separately-designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)58(A) of the Exchange Act. The current members of our Audit Committee are three independent directors (as defined under applicable SEC and Nasdaq rules): Dan Mason, Antonio S. Fernandez and Jose A. Villamil. Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Fernandez, the Chairman of the Audit Committee, is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under Item 401(h) of Regulation S-K.

      The following table sets forth all compensation awarded to, earned by or paid for services rendered to SBS and its subsidiaries, in all capacities during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004, December 31, 2003 and December 29, 2002, by our Chief Executive Officer and President and our next highest paid executive officers at December 31, 2004, whose total annual salary and bonus exceeded $100,000.

Summary Compensation Table

Stock Options

      The following table sets forth information concerning the grant of stock options to each of the named executive officers in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004:

Option/ SAR Grants in Last Fiscal Year