SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM INC - Quarter Report: 2008 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One) | ||
þ
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 | ||
or |
||
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the transition period from to |
Commission file number 33-82114
Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
13-3827791 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
___________________________
2601 South Bayshore Drive, PH II
Coconut Grove, Florida 33133
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Coconut Grove, Florida 33133
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(305) 441-6901
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company þ | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of November 7, 2008, 41,445,222 shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per
share, 23,403,500 shares of Class B common stock, par value $0.0001 per share and 380,000 shares of
Series C convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share, which are convertible into
7,600,000 shares of Class A common stock, were outstanding.
SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC.
INDEX
2
Table of Contents
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains both historical and forward-looking statements.
All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be,
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking
statements are not based on historical facts, but rather reflect our current expectations
concerning future results and events. These forward-looking statements generally can be identified
by the use of statements that include phrases such as
believe, expect, anticipate, intend,
estimate, plan, project, foresee, likely, will or other words or phrases with similar
meanings. Similarly, statements that describe our objectives, plans or goals are, or may be,
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to
be different from any future results, performance and anticipated achievements expressed or implied
by these statements. We do not intend to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In addition, forward-looking
statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from our historical experience and our present expectations or projections. These risks
and uncertainties include, but are not limited to those described in this report, in Part II, Item
1A. Risk Factors and elsewhere in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007, and those described from time to time in our future reports filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC).
3
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements Unaudited |
SPANISH
BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(In thousands, except share data) | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 34,005 | 61,122 | |||||
Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $1,458 in 2008 and $3,623 in 2007 |
29,663 | 35,835 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
8,100 | 4,515 | ||||||
Total current assets |
71,768 | 101,472 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
of $42,649 in 2008 and $38,188 in 2007 |
53,769 | 43,739 | ||||||
FCC broadcasting licenses |
353,612 | 749,864 | ||||||
Goodwill |
32,806 | 32,806 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization
of $169 in 2008 and $142 in 2007 |
1,265 | 1,292 | ||||||
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated
amortization of $3,686 in 2008 and $2,860 in 2007 |
3,977 | 4,803 | ||||||
Other assets |
3,086 | 2,153 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 520,283 | 936,129 | |||||
Liabilities and Stockholders (Deficit) Equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
$ | 15,384 | 19,640 | |||||
Accrued interest |
256 | 246 | ||||||
Unearned revenue |
3,357 | 4,015 | ||||||
Deferred commitment fee |
244 | 300 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
55 | 84 | ||||||
Non-interest bearing promissory note payable due 2009, net of unamortized discount
of $363 in 2008 |
18,137 | | ||||||
Current portion of the senior credit facilities term loan due 2012 |
3,250 | 3,250 | ||||||
Current portion of other long-term debt |
436 | 430 | ||||||
Series B cumulative exchangeable redeemable preferred stock dividends payable |
| 2,014 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
41,119 | 29,979 | ||||||
Unearned revenue, less current portion |
| 305 | ||||||
Other liabilities, less current portion |
166 | 187 | ||||||
Derivative instruments |
4,639 | 3,582 | ||||||
Senior secured credit facility term loan due 2012, less current portion |
310,375 | 312,813 | ||||||
Other long-term debt, less current portion |
7,163 | 7,490 | ||||||
Non-interest bearing promissory note payable due 2009, net of unamortized discount
of $1,410 in 2007 |
| 17,090 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
71,798 | 170,148 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
435,260 | 541,594 | ||||||
Cumulative exchangeable redeemable preferred stock: |
||||||||
103/4% Series B cumulative exchangeable redeemable preferred
stock, $0.01 par value, liquidation value $1,000 per share.
Authorized 280,000 shares; 89,932 shares issued and
outstanding at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively |
91,946 | 89,932 | ||||||
Stockholders (deficit) equity: |
||||||||
Series C convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value and
liquidation value. Authorized 600,000 shares;
380,000 shares issued and outstanding at
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively |
4 | 4 | ||||||
Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value.
Authorized 100,000,000 shares; 41,443,555 and 40,777,805
shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007, respectively |
4 | 4 | ||||||
Class B common stock, $0.0001 par value.
Authorized 50,000,000 shares; 23,403,500 and 24,003,500
shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively |
2 | 2 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
524,630 | 524,030 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(8,042 | ) | (3,582 | ) | ||||
Accumulated deficit |
(523,521 | ) | (215,855 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders (deficit) equity |
(6,923 | ) | 304,603 | |||||
Total liabilities and stockholders
(deficit) equity |
$ | 520,283 | 936,129 | |||||
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
Three-Months Ended | Nine-Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenue |
$ | 41,253 | 46,772 | 122,866 | 133,580 | |||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Engineering and programming |
13,992 | 12,553 | 44,110 | 37,224 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
16,585 | 17,219 | 53,797 | 53,323 | ||||||||||||
Corporate expenses |
2,707 | 3,881 | 9,972 | 10,596 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,792 | 1,194 | 4,596 | 3,436 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
35,076 | 34,847 | 112,475 | 104,579 | ||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on the disposal of assets, net |
(5 | ) | 51 | (10 | ) | 50 | ||||||||||
Impairment of FCC broadcasting licenses and restructuring costs |
2,199 | | 398,451 | | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
3,983 | 11,874 | (388,050 | ) | 28,951 | |||||||||||
Other (expense) income: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(5,686 | ) | (4,789 | ) | (16,085 | ) | (14,213 | ) | ||||||||
Change in fair value of derivative instrument |
3,585 | | 3,585 | | ||||||||||||
Other, net |
| 25 | 1,928 | 1,985 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
1,882 | 7,110 | (398,622 | ) | 16,723 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
2,325 | 4,569 | (98,207 | ) | 10,778 | |||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
(443 | ) | 2,541 | (300,415 | ) | 5,945 | ||||||||||
Dividends on Series B preferred stock |
(2,417 | ) | (2,417 | ) | (7,251 | ) | (7,251 | ) | ||||||||
Net (loss) income applicable to
common stockholders |
$ | (2,860 | ) | 124 | (307,666 | ) | (1,306 | ) | ||||||||
Basic and diluted net loss per common share |
$ | (0.04 | ) | | (4.25 | ) | (0.02 | ) | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
72,418 | 72,381 | 72,409 | 72,381 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
72,418 | 72,386 | 72,409 | 72,381 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders (Deficit) Equity
and Comprehensive Loss for the Nine-Months Ended September 30, 2008
and Comprehensive Loss for the Nine-Months Ended September 30, 2008
Class C | Class A | Class B | Accumulated | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
preferred stock | common stock | common stock | Additional | other | stockholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Par | Number of | Par | Number of | Par | paid-in | comprehensive | Accumulated | (deficit) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
shares | value | shares | value | shares | value | capital | loss | deficit | equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
380,000 | $ | 4 | 40,777,805 | $ | 4 | 24,003,500 | $ | 2 | $ | 524,030 | $ | (3,582 | ) | $ | (215,855 | ) | $ | 304,603 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion
of Class B common stock to Class A common stock |
| | 600,000 | | (600,000 | ) | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Class A common stock from
vesting of restricted stock |
| | 65,750 | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | | | | | 600 | | | 600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Series B preferred stock dividends |
| | | | | | | | (7,251 | ) | (7,251 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | | | | (300,415 | ) | (300,415 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments |
| | | | | | | (4,460 | ) | | (4,460 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss |
(304,875 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2008 |
380,000 | $ | 4 | 41,443,555 | $ | 4 | 23,403,500 | $ | 2 | $ | 524,630 | $ | (8,042 | ) | $ | (523,521 | ) | $ | (6,923 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Nine-Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (300,415 | ) | 5,945 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
(Gain) loss on the sale of assets |
(10 | ) | 50 | |||||
Impairment of FCC broadcasting licenses and restructuring costs |
398,451 | | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
600 | 1,229 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,596 | 3,436 | ||||||
Net barter income |
(144 | ) | (173 | ) | ||||
Provision for trade doubtful accounts |
717 | 1,122 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
826 | 835 | ||||||
Amortization of discount on the non-interest bearing promissory note payable |
1,047 | 968 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(98,350 | ) | 10,642 | |||||
Decrease in unearned revenue |
(1,731 | ) | (1,800 | ) | ||||
Accretion of the time-value of money component related to unearned revenue |
122 | 183 | ||||||
Change in
fair value of derivative instrument, net of amortization |
(3,403 | ) | | |||||
Amortization of deferred commitment fee |
(56 | ) | (56 | ) | ||||
Amortization of other liabilities |
(50 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Decrease (increase) in trade receivables |
5,628 | (4,588 | ) | |||||
Increase in other current assets |
(3,585 | ) | (52 | ) | ||||
Increase in other assets |
(933 | ) | (1,396 | ) | ||||
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(5,579 | ) | (2,557 | ) | ||||
Increase in unearned revenue |
617 | | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest |
45 | (77 | ) | |||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating
activities |
(1,607 | ) | 13,694 | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(9,763 | ) | (4,141 | ) | ||||
Acquisition of a building and its related building improvements |
(5,828 | ) | (2,590 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from an insurance recovery |
91 | 15 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(15,500 | ) | (6,716 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Payment of senior secured credit facility term loan 2012 |
(2,438 | ) | (2,438 | ) | ||||
Payment of Series B preferred stock cash dividends |
(7,251 | ) | (7,251 | ) | ||||
Payments of other long-term debt |
(321 | ) | (294 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(10,010 | ) | (9,983 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(27,117 | ) | (3,005 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
61,122 | 66,815 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 34,005 | 63,810 | |||||
Supplemental cash flows information: |
||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 14,893 | 14,950 | |||||
Income taxes paid, net |
22 | | ||||||
Noncash investing and financing activities: |
||||||||
Ten-year promissory note issued for the acquisition of a building |
$ | | 7,650 | |||||
Accrual of preferred stock as payment of preferred stock dividend |
2,014 | | ||||||
Unrealized
loss on derivative instruments |
(4,460 | ) | (4,961 | ) | ||||
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Basis of Presentation
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Spanish
Broadcasting System, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company, we, us, our or SBS). All
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The accompanying
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007 and for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 have been prepared
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. They do not
include all information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. These
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements as of, and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, included
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements contain all adjustments, which are all of a normal and recurring nature, necessary for a
fair presentation of the results of the interim periods. The results of operations for the three-
and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results for a
full year.
2. Stockholders Equity
(a) Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
On December 23, 2004, in connection with the closing of the merger agreement, dated October 5,
2004, with CBS Radio (formerly known as Infinity Media Corporation, CBS Radio), a division of CBS
Corporation, Infinity Broadcasting Corporation of San Francisco (Infinity SF) and SBS Bay Area,
LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of SBS (SBS Bay Area), we issued to CBS Radio (i) an aggregate of
380,000 shares of Series C convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share (the Series C
preferred stock), each of which is convertible at the option of the holder into twenty fully paid
and non-assessable shares of our Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value per share (the Class A
common stock); and (ii) a warrant to purchase an additional 190,000 shares of Series C preferred
stock, exercisable at any time from December 23, 2004 until December 23, 2008, at an exercise price
of $300.00 per share (the Warrant).
Under the terms of the certificate of designation governing the Series C preferred stock, the
holder of the Series C preferred stock has the right to convert each share into twenty fully paid
and non-assessable shares of our Class A common stock. The shares of Series C preferred stock
issued at the closing of the merger are convertible into 7,600,000 shares of our Class A common
stock, subject to adjustment, and the Series C preferred stock issuable upon exercise of the
Warrant is convertible into an additional 3,800,000 shares of our Class A common stock, subject to
adjustment. To date, the Warrant has not been exercised.
In connection with the closing of the merger transaction, we also entered into a registration
rights agreement with CBS Radio, pursuant to which, CBS Radio may instruct us to file up to three
registration statements, on a best efforts basis, with the SEC providing for the registration for resale of the Class A common stock issuable upon
conversion of the Series C preferred stock.
We are required to pay holders of Series C preferred stock dividends on parity with our Class
A common stock and Class B common stock, $0.0001 par value per share (the Class B common stock),
and each other class or series of our capital stock, if created, after December 23, 2004.
(b) Class A and B Common Stock
The rights of the holders of shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock are
identical, except for voting rights and conversion provisions. The Class A common stock is entitled
to one vote per share and the Class B common stock is entitled to ten votes per share. The Class B
common stock is convertible to Class A common stock on a share-for-share basis at the option of the
holder at any time, or automatically upon the transfer to a person or entity which is not a
permitted transferee. Holders of each class of common stock are entitled to receive dividends and,
upon liquidation or dissolution, are entitled to receive all assets available for distribution to
stockholders. The
8
Table of Contents
holders of each class have no preemptive or other subscription rights and there are no
redemption or sinking fund provisions with respect to such shares. Each class of common stock is
subordinate to our 10 3/4% Series B cumulative exchangeable redeemable
preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share and liquidation preference of $1,000 per share (the
Series B preferred stock) and on parity with the Series C preferred stock with respect to
dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, winding up and dissolution of SBS.
(c) Warrant
In connection with the merger agreement with CBS Radio, as discussed in Note 2(a), we have a
Warrant outstanding to ultimately purchase an aggregate of 3,800,000 shares of our Class A common
stock, which expires on December 23, 2008.
(d) Share-based Compensation Plans
2006 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan
In July 2006, we adopted an omnibus equity compensation plan (the Omnibus Plan) in which
grants can be made to participants in any of the following forms: (i) incentive stock options, (ii)
non-qualified stock options, (iii) stock appreciation rights, (iv) stock units, (v) stock awards,
(vi) dividend equivalents, and (vii) other stock-based awards. The Omnibus Plan authorizes up to
3,500,000 shares of our Class A common stock for issuance, subject to adjustment in certain
circumstances. The Omnibus Plan provides that the maximum aggregate number of shares of Class A
common stock that may be granted, other than dividend equivalents, to any individual during any
calendar year is 1,000,000 shares, subject to adjustments. In addition, the maximum aggregate
number of shares of Class A common stock with respect to grants of stock units, stock awards and
other stock-based awards that may be granted to any individual during a calendar year is also
1,000,000 shares, subject to adjustments.
1999 Stock Option Plans
In September 1999, we adopted an employee incentive stock option plan (the 1999 ISO Plan)
and a non-employee director stock option plan (the 1999 NQ
Plan, and together with the 1999 ISO
Plan, the 1999 Stock Option Plans). Options granted under the 1999 ISO Plan will vest according
to terms to be determined by the compensation committee of our board of directors, and will have a
contractual life of up to 10 years from the date of grant. Options granted under the 1999 NQ Plan
will vest 20% upon grant and 20% each year for the first four years from the date of grant. All
options granted under the 1999 ISO Plan and the 1999 NQ Plan vest immediately upon a change in
control of SBS, as defined therein. A total of 3,000,000 shares and 300,000 shares of Class A
common stock were reserved for issuance under the 1999 ISO Plan and the 1999 NQ Plan, respectively.
Additionally, on November 2, 1999, we granted a stock option to purchase 250,000 shares of Class A
common stock to a former director. This option vested immediately, and expires 10 years from the
date of grant.
(e) Stock-Based Compensation Expense
The impact on our results of operations of recognizing stock-based compensation for the three-
and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was as follows (in thousands):
Three-Months Ended | Nine-Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Engineering and programming expenses |
$ | 8 | 192 | $ | 176 | 569 | ||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
22 | 32 | 92 | 101 | ||||||||||||
Corporate expenses |
88 | 144 | 332 | 559 | ||||||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense |
$ | 118 | 368 | $ | 600 | 1,229 | ||||||||||
During the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, no stock
options were exercised; therefore, no cash payments were received. In addition, we did not
recognize a tax benefit on our stock-based compensation expense due to our valuation allowance on
substantially all of our deferred tax assets.
Stock Options
Stock options have only been granted to employees or directors under our 1999 Stock Option
Plans. Our stock options have various vesting schedules and are subject to the employees continuing
service to SBS. We recognize compensation expense based on the estimated grant date fair value
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and recognize the compensation expense using a
straight-line amortization method. When estimating forfeitures, we consider voluntary termination
behaviors, as well as trends of actual option forfeitures. Ultimately, our stock-based compensation
expense is based on awards that vest. Our stock-based compensation has been reduced for estimated
forfeitures.
9
Table of Contents
A summary of the status of our stock options, as of December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2008,
and changes during the nine-months ended September 30, 2008, is presented below (in thousands,
except per share data):
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | |||||||||||||||
Average | Aggregate | Remaining | ||||||||||||||
Exercise | Intrinsic | Contractual | ||||||||||||||
Shares | Price | Value | Life (Years) | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 |
3,063 | $ | 10.86 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
125 | 0.45 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
| | ||||||||||||||
Forfeited |
(36 | ) | 10.58 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2008 |
3,152 | $ | 10.45 | $ | | 3.8 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at September 30, 2008 |
2,957 | $ | 10.95 | $ | | 3.4 | ||||||||||
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and
exercisable at September 30, 2008 (in thousands, except per share data):
Outstanding | Weighted | Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Remaining | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Contractual | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unvested | Exercise | Life | Number | Exercise | |||||||||||||||||||||
Range of Exercise Prices | Vested Options | Options | Price | (Years) | Exercisable | Price | |||||||||||||||||||
$
|
0.45 4.99 | 362 | 138 | $ | 2.94 | 7.7 | 362 | $ | 3.57 | ||||||||||||||||
5.00 9.99 | 1,697 | 47 | 8.71 | 3.5 | 1,697 | 8.78 | |||||||||||||||||||
10.00 14.99 | 193 | 10 | 10.77 | 5.9 | 193 | 10.77 | |||||||||||||||||||
15.00 20.00 | 705 | | 20.00 | 1.1 | 705 | 20.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
2,957 | 195 | $ | 10.45 | 3.8 | 2,957 | $ | 10.95 | ||||||||||||||||||
Nonvested Shares
Nonvested shares (restricted stock or restricted stock units) are awarded to employees under
our Omnibus Plan. In general, nonvested shares vest over three to five years and are subject to the
employees continuing service to us. The cost of nonvested shares is determined using the fair value
of our common stock on the date of grant. The compensation expense is recognized over the vesting
period.
A summary of the status of our nonvested shares, as of December 31, 2007 and September 30,
2008, and changes during the nine-months ended September 30, 2008, is presented below (in
thousands, except per share data):
Weighted | ||||||||
Average Grant- | ||||||||
Date Fair Value | ||||||||
Shares | (per Share) | |||||||
Nonvested at December 31, 2007 |
77 | $ | 4.19 | |||||
Awarded |
215 | 0.92 | ||||||
Vested |
(66 | ) | 1.86 | |||||
Forfeited |
| | ||||||
Nonvested at September 30, 2008 |
226 | $ | 1.76 | |||||
3. Basic and Diluted Net (Loss) Income Per Common Share
Basic net (loss) income per common share was computed by dividing net (loss) income applicable
to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and convertible
preferred stock outstanding for each period presented, using the if converted method. Diluted net
(loss) income per common share is computed by giving effect to common stock equivalents as if they
were outstanding for the entire period.
Common stock equivalents were not considered in the calculation for the three- and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2008 and for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, since
their effect would be anti-dilutive. If included, the common stock equivalents for these periods
would have amounted to zero for all periods. During the three-month period ended September 30,
2007, common stock equivalents included in the calculation amounted to five for the period.
10
Table of Contents
4. Operating Segments
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of
an Enterprise and Related Information, establishes standards for the way public business
enterprises report information about operating segments in annual financial statements and requires
those enterprises to report selected information about operating segments in interim financial
reports. We have two reportable segments: radio and television. The following summary table
presents separate financial data for each of our operating segments (in thousands):
Three-Months Ended | Nine-Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | Change | September 30, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | 2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 36,411 | 44,333 | (7,922 | ) | (18%) | 110,445 | 126,421 | (15,976 | ) | (13%) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Television |
4,842 | 2,439 | 2,403 | 99% | 12,421 | 7,159 | 5,262 | 74% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 41,253 | 46,772 | (5,519 | ) | (12%) | 122,866 | 133,580 | (10,714 | ) | (8%) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Engineering and
programming expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 9,438 | 8,957 | 481 | 5% | 29,590 | 26,867 | 2,723 | 10% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Television |
4,554 | 3,596 | 958 | 27% | 14,520 | 10,357 | 4,163 | 40% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 13,992 | 12,553 | 1,439 | 11% | 44,110 | 37,224 | 6,886 | 18% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative
expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 13,579 | 15,351 | (1,772 | ) | (12%) | 45,449 | 48,068 | (2,619 | ) | (5%) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Television |
3,006 | 1,868 | 1,138 | 61% | 8,348 | 5,255 | 3,093 | 59% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 16,585 | 17,219 | (634 | ) | (4%) | 53,797 | 53,323 | 474 | 1% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate expenses: |
$ | 2,707 | 3,881 | (1,174 | ) | (30%) | 9,972 | 10,596 | (624 | ) | (6%) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and
amortization: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 817 | 716 | 101 | 14% | 2,397 | 2,153 | 244 | 11% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Television |
578 | 170 | 408 | 240% | 1,022 | 440 | 582 | 132% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
397 | 308 | 89 | 29% | 1,177 | 843 | 334 | 40% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 1,792 | 1,194 | 598 | 50% | 4,596 | 3,436 | 1,160 | 34% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on the
disposal of assets,
net: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | (5 | ) | 51 | (56 | ) | (110%) | (10 | ) | 50 | (60 | ) | (120%) | |||||||||||||||||||
Television |
| | | 0% | | | | 0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
| | | 0% | | | | 0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | (5 | ) | 51 | (56 | ) | (110%) | (10 | ) | 50 | (60 | ) | (120%) | |||||||||||||||||||
Impairment of FCC
broadcasting licenses
and restructuring
costs: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 2,191 | | 2,191 | 100% | 381,606 | | 381,606 | 100% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Television |
8 | | 8 | 100% | 16,845 | | 16,845 | 100% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
| | | 0% | | | | 0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 2,199 | | 2,199 | 100% | 398,451 | | 398,451 | 100% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating
income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 10,391 | 19,258 | (8,867 | ) | (46%) | (348,587 | ) | 49,283 | (397,870 | ) | (807%) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Television |
(3,304 | ) | (3,195 | ) | (109 | ) | 3% | (28,314 | ) | (8,893 | ) | (19,421 | ) | 218% | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
(3,104 | ) | (4,189 | ) | 1,085 | (26%) | (11,149 | ) | (11,439 | ) | 290 | (3%) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 3,983 | 11,874 | (7,891 | ) | (66%) | (388,050 | ) | 28,951 | (417,001 | ) | (1440%) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 326 | 342 | (16 | ) | (5%) | 2,643 | 1,358 | 1,285 | 95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Television |
2,826 | 1,005 | 1,821 | 181% | 12,525 | 3,030 | 9,495 | 313% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
60 | 974 | (914 | ) | (94%) | 423 | 2,343 | (1,920 | ) | (82%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 3,212 | 2,321 | 891 | 38% | 15,591 | 6,731 | 8,860 | 132% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets: |
2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 447,300 | 862,048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Television |
63,519 | 62,462 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
9,464 | 11,619 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 520,283 | 936,129 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11
Table of Contents
5. Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Our total comprehensive (loss) income, comprised of net (loss) income and unrealized loss on
derivative instruments, for the three- and nine-months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, was as follows (in thousands):
Three-Months ended | Nine-Months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (443 | ) | 2,541 | (300,415 | ) | 5,945 | |||||||||
Other comprehensive loss: |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments |
(3,200 | ) | (6,630 | ) | (4,460 | ) | (4,961 | ) | ||||||||
Total comprehensive (loss) income |
$ | (3,643 | ) | (4,089 | ) | (304,875 | ) | 984 | ||||||||
6. New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141R, Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141R) and SFAS
No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment to ARB No.
51 (SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 141R and SFAS No. 160 require most identifiable assets, liabilities,
non-controlling interests, and goodwill acquired in a business combination to be recorded at full
fair value and require noncontrolling interests (previously referred to as minority interests) to
be reported as a component of equity, which changes the accounting for transactions with
non-controlling interest holders. Both SFAS No. 141R and SFAS No. 160 are effective for periods
beginning on or after December 15, 2008 or fiscal year 2009 for us. SFAS No. 141R will be applied
to business combinations occurring after the effective date. SFAS No. 160 will be applied
prospectively to all non-controlling interests, including any that arose before the effective date.
We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS No. 141R and SFAS No. 160 on our results of
operations and financial position.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 161), which amends SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 133). SFAS No. 161 requires companies with
derivative instruments to disclose information that should enable financial statement users to
understand how and why a company uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and
related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133, and how derivative instruments and
related hedged items affect a companys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.
The required disclosures include the fair value of derivative instruments and their gains or losses
in tabular format, information about credit risk-related contingent features in derivative
agreements, counterparty credit risk, and a companys strategies and objectives for using
derivative instruments. SFAS No. 161 expands the current disclosure framework in SFAS No. 133 and
is effective prospectively for periods beginning on or after November 15, 2008 or fiscal year 2009
for us.
7. Income Taxes
During the three-months ended September 30, 2008, we determined we are no longer able to
estimate our annual effective tax rate which would be applied to our pre-tax ordinary income. In
accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 18, Accounting for Income Taxes in Interim Periods, we are
calculating our effective income tax rate using a year to date income tax calculation. Our income
tax expense differs from the statutory federal tax rate of 35% and related statutory state tax
rates, primarily as a result of the application of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (SFAS No. 142). Under SFAS No. 142, the reversal of our deferred tax liabilities related
to our intangible assets could no longer be assured over our net operating loss carry forward
period. Therefore, our effective tax rate is impacted by establishing a valuation allowance on
substantially all of our deferred tax assets.
12
Table of Contents
On January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial
statements in accordance with FASB Statement 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, and prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement process for financial statement recognition and measurement
of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure
and transition.
We file federal, state and local income tax returns in the United States and Puerto Rico. The
tax years that remain subject to assessment of additional liabilities by the United States federal,
state, and local tax authorities are 2005 through 2007. The tax years that remain subject to
assessment of additional liabilities by the Puerto Rico tax authority are 2003 through 2007.
Based on our evaluation, we have concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax
positions requiring recognition in our consolidated financial statements. Upon implementation of
FIN 48, we reviewed prior year tax filings and other corporate records for any uncertain tax
positions in accordance with recognition standards established for which the statute of limitations
remained open.
8. Litigation
We are subject to certain legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course
of business and have not been fully adjudicated. In our opinion, we do not have a potential
liability related to any current legal proceedings and claims that would individually or in the
aggregate have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or operating results. However,
the results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. Should we fail to prevail in
any of these legal matters or should all of these legal matters be resolved against us in the same
reporting period, the operating results of a particular reporting period could be materially
adversely affected.
Wolf, et al., Litigation
On November 28, 2001, a complaint was filed against us in the United States District Court for
the Southern District of New York (the Southern District of New York) and was amended on April
19, 2002. The amended complaint alleges that the named plaintiff, Mitchell Wolf, purchased shares
of our Class A common stock pursuant to the October 27, 1999, prospectus and registration statement
relating to our initial public offering which closed on November 2, 1999 (the IPO). The complaint
was brought on behalf of Mr. Wolf and an alleged class of similarly situated purchasers against us,
eight underwriters and/or their successors-in-interest who led or otherwise participated in our
IPO, two members of our senior management team, one of whom is our Chairman of the Board, and an
additional director, referred to collectively as the individual defendants. To date, the complaint,
while served upon us, has not been served upon the individual defendants.
This case is one of more than 300 similar cases brought by similar counsel against more than
300 issuers, 40 underwriter defendants, and 1,000 individuals alleging, in general, violations of
federal securities laws in connection with initial public offerings, in particular, failing to
disclose that the underwriter defendants allegedly solicited and received additional, excessive and
undisclosed commissions from certain investors in exchange for which they allocated to those
investors material portions of the restricted shares issued in connection with each offering. All
of these cases, including the one involving us, have been assigned for consolidated pretrial
purposes to one judge of the Southern District of New York. One of the claims against the
individual defendants, specifically the Section 10b-5 claim, has been dismissed. On September 21,
2007, Kaye Scholer, on behalf of the individual defendants, executed a tolling agreement with
plaintiffs providing for the dismissal without prejudice of all claims against the individual
defendants upon the provision to plaintiffs of documentation showing that SBS has entity coverage
for the period in question. Documentation of such coverage was subsequently provided to plaintiffs
on December 19, 2007.
In June of 2003, after lengthy negotiations, a settlement proposal was embodied in a
memorandum of understanding among the investors in the plaintiff class, the issuer defendants and
the issuer defendants insurance carriers. On July 23, 2003, our Board of Directors approved both
the memorandum of understanding and an agreement between the issuer defendants and the insurers.
The principal components of the settlement include: (1) a release of all claims against the issuer
defendants and their directors, officers and certain other related parties arising out of the
alleged wrongful conduct in the amended complaint; (2) the assignment to the plaintiffs of certain
of the issuer defendants potential claims against the underwriter defendants; and (3) a guarantee
by the insurers to the plaintiffs of the difference between $1.0 billion and any lesser amount
recovered by the plaintiffs against the underwriter defendants. The payments will be charged to
each issuer defendants insurance policy on a pro rata basis.
13
Table of Contents
On February 15, 2005, the Southern District of New York granted preliminary approval to the
proposed settlement agreement, subject to a narrowing of the proposed bar on underwriter and
non-settling defendant claims against the issuer defendants to cover only contribution claims. The
court directed the parties to submit revised settlement documents consistent with its opinion and
scheduled a conference for March 18, 2005 in order to (a) make final determinations as to the form,
substance and program of notice and (b) schedule a Rule 23 fairness hearing. Pursuant to the
courts request, on May 2, 2005 the parties submitted an Amendment to Stipulation and Agreement of
Settlement with Defendant Issuers and Individuals (the Amendment). Our Board of Directors
approved the Amendment on May 4, 2005 and it has since received unanimous approval from all the
non-bankrupt issuers. On August 31, 2005, the court issued an order of preliminary approval,
reciting that the Amendment had been entered into by the parties to the Issuers Settlement
Stipulation.
On December 5, 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (the Second
Circuit) reversed the Southern District Of New Yorks October 13, 2004 order granting a motion for
class certification in six focus cases out of the more than 300 consolidated class actions,
holding that Plaintiffs could not satisfy the predominance requirement for a Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 23(b)(3) class action. On December 14, 2006, the court held a conference with all counsel
in the IPO cases to consider the impact of the Second Circuits reversal of class certification on
these cases, including whether a class can be certified for settlement purposes when it cannot
otherwise be certified for litigation purposes. The court determined to defer deciding the motion
for final approval of the Issuers Settlement until further word from the Second Circuit about
whether or not it will want to consider rehearing. On January 5, 2007, Plaintiffs filed a petition
with the Second Circuit for a rehearing or rehearing en banc.
On May 30, 2007, the Southern District of New York held a status conference to discuss the
impact of the Second Circuits December 5, 2006 decision and plaintiffs made an oral motion for
class certification with respect to all of the consolidated actions, based on newly proposed class
definitions. On October 10, 2008, at plaintiffs request, the Southern District of New York ordered the withdrawal without prejudice of plaintiffs motion for class certification, which had been fully briefed and was sub judice.
On August 14, 2007, plaintiffs filed amended complaints in the six focus cases and amended
master allegations in the consolidated actions. On November 13, 2007, the issuer defendants moved
to dismiss the amended complaints in the six focus cases. On March 26, 2008, the court granted in
part the motion as to a subset of plaintiffs Section 11 claims, but denied the motion as to
plaintiffs other claims. We are not named in any of the six focus cases.
On December 21, 2007, the underwriter defendants and issuer defendants filed oppositions to
plaintiffs motion for class certification in the six focus cases. Plaintiffs reply brief was
filed on March 28, 2008 and the underwriter defendants and
issuer defendants surreply briefs were due on April 22, 2008. The court has not indicated that it will hold oral argument.
On January 7, 2008, the underwriter defendants filed a motion (in which the issuer defendants
joined) to strike class allegations in 26 of the consolidated cases, including the case against us,
on the ground that plaintiffs lacked a putative class representative in those cases at the time of
their May 30, 2007 oral motion.
On May 13, 2008, the Court issued an order granting the motion in part and striking certain of
the class allegations relating to the Section 10b-5 claims in 8 of the 26 actions, including the
action against us. The order also requires Plaintiffs to make certain disclosures with respect to
the putative class representatives in the remaining 18 actions. Once the disclosures are filed,
Defendants may seek clarification of the Courts May 13, 2008 order with respect to the status of
the remaining 10b-5-related class allegations in the other 8 actions, including our action, as well
as the status of the Section 11-related class allegations. Based on the current developments, we
believe that it is unlikely that this litigation will result in any material liability to us that
would not be covered by our existing insurance.
9.
Impairment of FCC Broadcasting Licenses and Restructuring Costs
Our
indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of FCC broadcasting licenses. FCC broadcasting
licenses are granted to stations for up to eight years under the Telecommunications Act of 1996
(the Act). The Act requires the FCC to renew a broadcast license if: (i) it finds that the station
has served the public interest, convenience and necessity; (ii) there have been no serious
violations of either the Communications Act of 1934
14
Table of Contents
or the
FCCs rules and regulations by the licensee; and (iii) there have been no other serious violations, which taken together,
constitute a pattern of abuse. We intend to renew our licenses indefinitely and evidence supports
our ability to do so. Historically, there has been no material challenge to our license renewals.
In addition, the technology used in broadcasting is not expected to be replaced by another
technology any time in the foreseeable future.
In
accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (SFAS No. 142), we do
not amortize our FCC broadcasting licenses. We test these indefinite-lived intangible assets for
impairment at least annually or when an event occurs that may indicate that impairment may have
occurred. Our valuations principally use the discounted cash flow methodology. This income approach
consists of a quantitative model, which assumes the FCC broadcasting licenses are acquired and
operated by a third-party. This income approach incorporates variables such as types of signals,
media competition, audience share, market advertising revenue, market revenue projections,
anticipated operating profit margins and discount rates. In the preparation of the FCC broadcasting
license appraisals, we make estimates and assumptions that affect the valuation of the intangible
assets. These estimates and assumptions could differ from actual results.
We generally test for impairment on our FCC broadcasting license intangible assets at the
individual license level. However, we have applied the guidance in EITF 02-07, Unit of Accounting
for Testing Impairment of Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets (EITF 02-07), to certain of our FCC
broadcasting license intangible assets. EITF 02-07 states that separately recorded indefinite-lived
intangible assets should be combined into a single unit of accounting for purposes of testing
impairment if they are operated as a single asset and, as such, are essentially inseparable from
one another. We aggregate FCC broadcasting licenses for impairment testing if their signals are
simulcast and are operating as one revenue-producing asset.
Our goodwill consists of the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of tangible
and identifiable intangible net assets acquired in business combinations, when a business has
been acquired under the applicable accounting literature. SFAS No. 142 requires us to test goodwill
for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level in lieu of being amortized. We have
determined that we have two reporting units under SFAS No. 142, Radio and Television.
The goodwill impairment test is a two-step test. Under the first step, the fair value of the
reporting unit is compared with its carrying value (including goodwill). If the fair value of the
reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an indication of goodwill impairment exists for the
reporting unit. Accordingly, the enterprise must perform step two of the impairment test
(measurement).
During the three-months ended June 30, 2008, we performed an impairment review of our
indefinite-lived intangible assets and determined that there was an impairment of our FCC
broadcasting licenses. We recorded a non-cash impairment loss of approximately $396.3 million
related to the FCC broadcasting licenses for certain individual stations in our Los Angeles, San
Francisco, Puerto Rico, Miami and New York markets. The tax impact of
the impairment loss was a tax benefit of approximately $109.2 million, which related to the reduction of the book/tax basis
differences on our FCC broadcasting licenses. The impairment loss was due to market changes in
estimates and assumptions which (a) decreased advertising revenue growth projections for the
broadcasting industry, and (b) increased the discount rate. Also, the current decline in cash flow
multiples for recent station sales were considered in the estimates and assumptions used.
Additionally, we performed an impairment review of our goodwill and determined that there was no
impairment.
Under
a restructuring plan to reduce expenses throughout the Company, we
incurred costs totaling $2.2 million related to the termination
of various programming contracts and personnel.
10. Derivative Instruments
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157),
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted SFAS No. 157
effective January 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not impact our consolidated financial
position and results of operations. In accordance with SFAS No. 157, the following table represents
our liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2008 and the
level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements are included.
15
Table of Contents
Fair Value Measurements at | ||||
September 30, 2008 | ||||
Using Significant Other | ||||
Description | Observable Inputs (Level 2) | |||
Derivatives Liabilities
|
$ | 4,639 |
In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157 (FSP No. 157-2), which defers the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for
non-financial assets and liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair
value on a recurring basis, to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods
within those fiscal years. We have elected the deferral option permitted by FSP No. 157-2 for our
non-financial assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value in prior business
combinations including intangible assets and goodwill. On October 10, 2008, the FASB issued Staff
Position FAS No. 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That
Asset Is Not Active, which clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, and
includes an example illustrating the key principles for determining fair value in a market that is
not active.
Accounting for Derivative Instruments
In September and October 2008, the counterparty to one of our interest rate swaps, Lehman
Brothers Special Financing Inc., and its parent and credit support provider, Lehman Brothers
Holdings Inc., each filed for bankruptcy. Based on these bankruptcy filings, we believe that these
cash flow hedges no longer qualify for hedge accounting. Therefore, the change in fair value from
September 15, 2008, the last time this hedge was determined to be effective, to September 30, 2008,
was $3.6 million which was recorded in earnings as a Change in fair value of derivative
instrument.
On September 15, 2008, the Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss associated with this hedge was
$7.8 million and will be reclassified into earnings (interest expense) over the remaining life of
the hedge, which terminates on June 30, 2010. During the three months ended September 30, 2008,
$0.2 million was reclassified and recorded as interest expense.
11. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
SFAS No. 107, Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments, requires disclosure of
the fair value of certain financial instruments. Cash and cash equivalents, receivables, prepaids
and other current assets, as well as accounts payable, accrued expenses, unearned revenue and other
current liabilities, as reflected in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, approximate fair
value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. The estimated fair value of our
other long-term debt instruments, approximate their carrying amounts as the interest rates
approximate our current borrowing rate for similar debt instruments of comparable maturity, or have
variable interest rates.
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market
information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates are subjective in
nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be
determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
The
estimated fair values of our financial instruments are as follows (in millions):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
carrying | carrying | |||||||||||||||
Description | amount | Fair value | amount | Fair value | ||||||||||||
Senior credit facilities
|
$ | 313.6 | 181.9 | 316.1 | 291.6 | |||||||||||
103/4% Series B cumulative exchangeable redeemable preferred stock
|
$ | 91.9 | 39.9 | 89.9 | 89.9 |
The fair value estimates of the financial instruments were based upon quotes from major
financial institutions taking into consideration current rates offered to us for debt or equity
instruments of the same remaining maturities.
16
Table of Contents
12. Subsequent Events
Draw Down of Revolving Credit Facility
On October 3, 2008, we requested to draw down $25.0 million from our $25.0 million revolver
facility under the senior secured credit facility agreement, dated as of June 10, 2005, among us,
Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, as syndication agent, Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as documentation agent, Lehman Commercial Paper Inc. (Lehman), as administrative
agent, and various lenders from time to time. On October 8, 2008, we only received an aggregate of
$15.0 million of the $25.0 million revolver as a result of Lehmans failure to fund its $10.0
million portion of the facility due to its bankruptcy filing.
The $15.0 million drawn on October 8, 2008 currently bears interest at a rate equal to 1.0%
over the base prime rate unless converted to a LIBOR-based term rate. As of October 8, 2008, the
applicable margin of the revolving credit facility was (i) 2.00% per annum for Eurodollar loans and
(ii) 1.00% per annum for base rate loans.
On October 24, 2008, the draw down on the revolver was used, with other funds, to repay the
non-interest bearing secured promissory note of $18.5 million. Please refer to the Early
Extinguishment of the $18.5 million Non-interest Bearing Promissory Note section below for further
details.
We are exploring options to replace Lehmans commitment within the revolver, but we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to obtain such replacement from others. However, we believe that we
have sufficient liquidity to conduct our normal operations and do not believe that the potential
reduction in available capacity under this revolver will have a material impact on our short-term
liquidity.
Dividend Payment on the Series B Preferred Stock
Under the terms of our Series B preferred stock, we are required to pay dividends at a rate of
10 3/4 % per year of the $1,000 liquidation preference per share of Series B preferred stock. From
October 30, 2003 to October 15, 2008, we had the option to pay these dividends in either cash or
additional shares of Series B preferred stock. On October 15, 2008, we paid our quarterly
dividend in additional shares of our Series B preferred stock. After October 15, 2008, we are
required to pay the quarterly dividends on our Series B preferred stock in cash.
NASDAQ Delisting Letter and Temporary Postponement
On October 22, 2008, we received a notification letter (the Letter) from The Nasdaq Stock
Market (NASDAQ), notifying us that NASDAQ has suspended, for a three-month period, effective
October 16, 2008, the enforcement of the rule requiring a minimum bid price and market value of
publicly held shares (the Rule). NASDAQ has said that it will not take any action to delist any
security for these concerns during the suspension period. NASDAQ has stated that, given the current
extraordinary market conditions, this suspension will remain in effect through Friday, January 16,
2009 and that the Rule will be reinstated on Monday, January 19, 2009, and the first relevant trade
date will be Tuesday, January 20, 2009.
We previously received a Staff Deficiency Letter from NASDAQ on August 20, 2008 indicating
that the minimum bid price of our common stock had fallen below $1.00 for 30 consecutive trading
days, and that it was therefore not in compliance with NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4450(b). The notice
further provided that in accordance with the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules, we would be provided 180
calendar days, or until February 17, 2009, to regain compliance with the minimum bid price
requirement.
We had 124 calendar days remaining in our compliance period as of October 16, 2008, the
effective date of NASDAQs suspension. Upon reinstatement of the rules on January 19, 2009, we will
have the same number of days remaining, or until May 26, 2009, to regain compliance. We may regain
compliance, either during the suspension or during the compliance period resuming after the
suspension, by achieving a $1.00 closing bid price for a minimum of 10 consecutive trading days.
During this interim period, our common stock is expected to continue to trade on The NASDAQ
Global Market. If compliance with Marketplace Rule 4450(b) cannot be demonstrated by May 26, 2009,
our common stock will be subject to delisting from The NASDAQ Global Market.
17
Table of Contents
We intend to use all reasonable efforts to maintain the listing of our common stock on the
Nasdaq Global Market, but there can be no guarantee that we will regain compliance with the
continued listing requirements, or will be able to demonstrate a plan to sustain compliance in
order to avoid delisting from the Nasdaq Global Market.
Early Extinguishment of the $18.5 million Non-interest Bearing Promissory Note
On October 24, 2008, we entered into a letter agreement with BC Media Funding Company II, LLC, as
agent for Media Funding Company, LLC, successors in interest to the rights of WDLP Broadcasting
Company, LLC and Robin Broadcasting Company, LLC, for the early extinguishment of the $18,500,000
non-interest bearing promissory note due January 2, 2009 (the Note).
Pursuant to the letter agreement, we received a discount of $150,000 and only paid $18,350,000 (the
Payoff Amount) in full satisfaction due under the Note. We used cash on hand and $15.0 million
of proceeds drawn down from the revolving credit facility to satisfy the Payoff Amount.
In addition, on October 24, 2008, we were released from all obligations and liabilities, security
interests, pledges, liens, mortgages, assignments or other interests granted by us and our
subsidiaries pursuant to the security agreement, the pledge agreement, the Note and any and all
documentation related to the loan documents.
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Overview
We own and/or operate 21 radio stations in markets that reach approximately 48% of the U.S.
Hispanic population. In addition, we own and operate two television stations and have four
broadcasting outlets under affiliation or programming agreements, which reach approximately 3.0
million households throughout the U.S. and Puerto Rico.
The success of each of our stations depends significantly upon its audience ratings and share
of the overall advertising revenue within its market. The broadcasting industry is a highly
competitive business, but some barriers to entry do exist. Each of our stations competes with both
Spanish-language and English-language stations in its market, as well as with other advertising
media, such as newspapers, cable television, the Internet, magazines, outdoor advertising,
satellite radio and television, transit advertising and direct mail marketing. Factors which are
material to our competitive position include management experience, our stations rank in their
markets, signal strength and frequency, and audience demographics, including the nature of the
Spanish-language market targeted by a particular station.
Our primary source of revenue is the sale of advertising time on our stations to local and
national advertisers. Our revenue is affected primarily by the advertising rates that our stations
are able to charge, as well as the overall demand for advertising time in each respective market.
Seasonal net broadcasting revenue fluctuations are common in the broadcasting industry and are
primarily due to fluctuations in advertising demand from local and national advertisers. Typically
for the broadcasting industry, the first calendar quarter generally produces the lowest revenue.
Our most significant operating expenses are compensation expenses, programming expenses,
professional fees, and advertising and promotional expenses. Our senior management strives to
control these expenses, as well as other expenses, by working closely with local station management
and others, including vendors.
Our radio stations are located in six of the top-ten Hispanic markets of Los Angeles, New
York, Puerto Rico, Chicago, Miami and San Francisco. Los Angeles and New York have the largest and
second largest Hispanic populations, and are also the largest and second largest radio markets in
the United States in terms of advertising revenue, respectively. We format the programming of each
of our radio stations to capture a substantial share of the U.S. Hispanic audience in their
respective markets. The U.S. Hispanic population is diverse, consisting of numerous identifiable
groups from many different countries of origin and each with its own musical and cultural heritage.
The music, culture, customs and Spanish dialects vary from one radio market to another. We strive
to maintain familiarity with the musical tastes and preferences of each of the various Hispanic
ethnic groups and customize our programming to match the local preferences of our target
demographic audience in each market we serve. Our radio revenue is generated primarily from the
sale of local and national advertising.
18
Table of Contents
Our television stations and related affiliates operate under one brand known as MegaTV. We
have created a
unique television format which focuses on entertainment, events and variety with high-quality
production. Our programming is formatted to capture shares of the U.S. Hispanic audience by
focusing on our core strengths as an entertainment company, thus offering a new alternative
compared to the traditional Latino channels. MegaTVs programming is based on a strategy designed
to showcase a combination of programs, ranging from televised radio-branded shows to general
entertainment programs, such as music, celebrity, debate, interviews and personality based shows.
As part of our strategy, we have incorporated certain of our on-air personalities into our
programming, as well as including interactive elements to complement our Internet websites. We
develop and produce more than 70% of our programming and obtain other content from Spanish-language
production partners. Our television revenue is generated primarily from the sale of local
advertising and paid programming.
As part of our operating business, we also operate LaMusica.com, Mega.tv, and our radio
station websites which are bilingual (Spanish English) websites providing content related to
Latin music, entertainment, news and culture. LaMusica.com and our network of station websites
generate revenue primarily from advertising and sponsorship. In addition, the majority of our
station websites simultaneously stream our stations content, which has broadened the audience
reach of our radio stations. We also occasionally produce live concerts and events throughout the
United States, including Puerto Rico.
Comparison Analysis of the Operating Results for the Three-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2008
and 2007
The following summary table presents financial data for each of our operating segments (in
thousands):
Three-Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, | Change | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||
Net revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 36,411 | 44,333 | (7,922 | ) | (18 | %) | |||||||||
Television |
4,842 | 2,439 | 2,403 | 99 | % | |||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 41,253 | 46,772 | (5,519 | ) | (12 | %) | |||||||||
Engineering and programming expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 9,438 | 8,957 | 481 | 5 | % | ||||||||||
Television |
4,554 | 3,596 | 958 | 27 | % | |||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 13,992 | 12,553 | 1,439 | 11 | % | ||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 13,579 | 15,351 | (1,772 | ) | (12 | %) | |||||||||
Television |
3,006 | 1,868 | 1,138 | 61 | % | |||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 16,585 | 17,219 | (634 | ) | (4 | %) | |||||||||
Corporate expenses: |
$ | 2,707 | 3,881 | (1,174 | ) | (30 | %) | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 817 | 716 | 101 | 14 | % | ||||||||||
Television |
578 | 170 | 408 | 240 | % | |||||||||||
Corporate |
397 | 308 | 89 | 29 | % | |||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 1,792 | 1,194 | 598 | 50 | % | ||||||||||
(Gain) loss on the disposal of assets, net: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | (5 | ) | 51 | (56 | ) | (110 | %) | ||||||||
Television |
| | | 0 | % | |||||||||||
Corporate |
| | | 0 | % | |||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | (5 | ) | 51 | (56 | ) | (110 | %) | ||||||||
Restructuring costs: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 2,191 | | 2,191 | 100 | % | ||||||||||
Television |
8 | | 8 | 100 | % | |||||||||||
Corporate |
| | | 0 | % | |||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 2,199 | | 2,199 | 100 | % | ||||||||||
Operating
income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 10,391 | 19,258 | (8,867 | ) | (46 | %) | |||||||||
Television |
(3,304 | ) | (3,195 | ) | (109 | ) | 3 | % | ||||||||
Corporate |
(3,104 | ) | (4,189 | ) | 1,085 | (26 | %) | |||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 3,983 | 11,874 | (7,891 | ) | (66 | %) | |||||||||
19
Table of Contents
The following summary table presents a comparison of our results of operations for the
three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. Various fluctuations illustrated in the
table are discussed below. This section should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements and notes.
Three-Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, | Change | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenue |
$ | 41,253 | 46,772 | (5,519 | ) | (12 | %) | |||||||||
Engineering and programming expenses |
13,992 | 12,553 | 1,439 | 11 | % | |||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
16,585 | 17,219 | (634 | ) | (4 | %) | ||||||||||
Corporate expenses |
2,707 | 3,881 | (1,174 | ) | (30 | %) | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,792 | 1,194 | 598 | 50 | % | |||||||||||
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets, net |
(5 | ) | 51 | (56 | ) | (110 | %) | |||||||||
Restructuring costs |
2,199 | | 2,199 | 100 | % | |||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 3,983 | 11,874 | (7,891 | ) | (66 | %) | |||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(5,686 | ) | (4,789 | ) | (897 | ) | 19 | % | ||||||||
Change in fair value of derivative instrument |
3,585 | | 3,585 | 100 | % | |||||||||||
Other income, net |
| 25 | (25 | ) | (100 | %) | ||||||||||
Income tax expense |
2,325 | 4,569 | (2,244 | ) | (49 | %) | ||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (443 | ) | $ | 2,541 | (2,984 | ) | (117 | %) | |||||||
Net Revenue. The decrease in our consolidated net revenue of $5.5 million or 12% was due
to the decrease in net revenue from our radio segment of $7.9 million or 18%, offset by an increase
in our television segment net revenue of $2.4 million or 99%. Our radio segment had a decrease in
net revenue primarily due to lower local and national sales. The decrease in local sales occurred
primarily in our Miami, Los Angeles, New York and Chicago markets, offset by an increase in our
Puerto Rico market. The decrease in national sales occurred throughout all of our markets. Our
television segment net revenue growth was primarily due to increases in local spot sales,
subscriber revenue related to the DIRECTV affiliation agreements, barter sales, and local
integrated sales.
Engineering and Programming Expenses. The increase in our consolidated engineering and
programming expenses of $1.4 million or 11% was due to increases in both our television and radio
segments. Our television segment expenses increased $0.9 million or 27%, primarily due to an
increase in original produced programming, as well as fiber link and transmitter line charges
related to the expansion of MegaTV outlets. Our radio segment expenses increased $0.5 million or
5%, primarily related to an increase in compensation and benefits for our radio programming
personnel related to new morning shows in our Puerto Rico, Chicago and Miami markets and an
increase in transmitter lines, rent and electricity expenses.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. The decrease in our consolidated selling,
general and administrative expenses of $0.6 million or 4% was due to a decrease in our radio
segment. Our radio segment expenses decreased $1.7 million or 12%, primarily due to a decrease in
advertising, promotional and marketing costs, sales commissions, and a decrease in the allowance
for doubtful account provision. Our television segment expenses increased $1.1 million or 61%,
primarily due to the increase in advertising, promotional and marketing costs related to new shows,
barter expense and employee compensation.
Corporate Expenses. The decrease in corporate expenses was a result of decreases in
professional fees related to legal costs, and employee compensation.
Depreciation and Amortization. The increase in our consolidated depreciation and amortization
expenses is directly related to the increase in capital expenditures throughout our company.
Restructuring Costs. The increase was related to restructuring costs associated with the
implementation of our restructuring plan. Under a restructuring plan to reduce expenses
throughout the company, we incurred costs
totaling $2.2 million related to the terminations of programming contracts and personnel.
20
Table of Contents
Operating Income. The decrease in operating income was mainly due to the decrease in
consolidated net revenue and the restructuring costs of $2.2 million, offset by a decrease in
corporate expenses.
Interest Expense, net. The increase in interest expense, net, was due to a decrease in
interest income, resulting from a general decline in interest rates on our lower cash balances.
Change in Fair Value of Derivative Instrument. In September and October 2008, the counterparty
to one of our interest rate swaps, Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc., and its parent and
credit support provider, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., each filed for bankruptcy. Based on these
bankruptcy filings, we believe that these cash flow hedges no longer qualify for hedge accounting.
Therefore, the change in fair value from September 15, 2008, the last time this hedge was
determined to be effective, and to September 30, 2008, was $3.6 million, which was recorded in
earnings as a Change in fair value of derivative instrument.
Income
Taxes. The decrease in income tax expense was related to the impact
of the prior quarters impairment of FCC broadcasting licenses
had on our income taxes for the current period.
Net (Loss) Income. The decrease in net (loss) income was primarily due to the decrease in
operating income, offset by the change in fair value of derivative instrument and decrease in
income taxes.
Comparison Analysis of the Operating Results for the Nine-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2008
and 2007
The following summary table presents financial data for each of our operating segments (in
thousands):
Nine-Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, | Change | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||
Net revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
110,445 | 126,421 | (15,976 | ) | (13 | %) | ||||||||||
Television |
12,421 | 7,159 | 5,262 | 74 | % | |||||||||||
Consolidated |
122,866 | 133,580 | (10,714 | ) | (8 | %) | ||||||||||
Engineering and programming expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
29,590 | 26,867 | 2,723 | 10 | % | |||||||||||
Television |
14,520 | 10,357 | 4,163 | 40 | % | |||||||||||
Consolidated |
44,110 | 37,224 | 6,886 | 18 | % | |||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
45,449 | 48,068 | (2,619 | ) | (5 | %) | ||||||||||
Television |
8,348 | 5,255 | 3,093 | 59 | % | |||||||||||
Consolidated |
53,797 | 53,323 | 474 | 1 | % | |||||||||||
Corporate expenses: |
9,972 | 10,596 | (624 | ) | (6 | %) | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
2,397 | 2,153 | 244 | 11 | % | |||||||||||
Television |
1,022 | 440 | 582 | 132 | % | |||||||||||
Corporate |
1,177 | 843 | 334 | 40 | % | |||||||||||
Consolidated |
4,596 | 3,436 | 1,160 | 34 | % | |||||||||||
(Gain) loss on the disposal of assets, net: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
(10 | ) | 50 | (60 | ) | (120 | %) | |||||||||
Television |
| | | 0 | % | |||||||||||
Corporate |
| | | 0 | % | |||||||||||
Consolidated |
(10 | ) | 50 | (60 | ) | (120 | %) | |||||||||
Impairment of FCC broadcasting
licenses and restructuring costs: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
381,606 | | 381,606 | 100 | % | |||||||||||
Television |
16,845 | | 16,845 | 100 | % | |||||||||||
Corporate |
| | | 0 | % | |||||||||||
Consolidated |
398,451 | | 398,451 | 100 | % | |||||||||||
Operating (loss) income: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
(348,587 | ) | 49,283 | (397,870 | ) | (807 | %) | |||||||||
Television |
(28,314 | ) | (8,893 | ) | (19,421 | ) | 218 | % | ||||||||
Corporate |
(11,149 | ) | (11,439 | ) | 290 | (3 | %) | |||||||||
Consolidated |
(388,050 | ) | 28,951 | (417,001 | ) | (1440 | %) | |||||||||
21
Table of Contents
The following summary table presents a comparison of our results of operations for the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. Various fluctuations illustrated in the table
are discussed below. This section should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements and notes.
Nine-Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, | Change | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | % | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenue |
$ | 122,866 | 133,580 | (10,714 | ) | (8 | %) | |||||||||
Engineering and programming expenses |
44,110 | 37,224 | 6,886 | 18 | % | |||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
53,797 | 53,323 | 474 | 1 | % | |||||||||||
Corporate expenses |
9,972 | 10,596 | (624 | ) | (6 | %) | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,596 | 3,436 | 1,160 | 34 | % | |||||||||||
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets, net |
(10 | ) | 50 | (60 | ) | (120 | %) | |||||||||
Impairment of FCC broadcasting licenses and restructuring costs |
398,451 | | 398,451 | 100 | % | |||||||||||
Operating (loss) income |
$ | (388,050 | ) | 28,951 | (417,001 | ) | (1440 | %) | ||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(16,085 | ) | (14,213 | ) | (1,872 | ) | 13 | % | ||||||||
Change in fair value of derivative instrument |
3,585 | | 3,585 | 100 | % | |||||||||||
Other income, net |
1,928 | 1,985 | (57 | ) | (3 | %) | ||||||||||
Income tax (benefit) expense |
(98,207 | ) | 10,778 | (108,985 | ) | (1011 | %) | |||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (300,415 | ) | $ | 5,945 | (306,360 | ) | (5153 | %) | |||||||
Net Revenue. The decrease in our consolidated net revenue of $10.7 million or 8% was due
to the decrease in net revenue from our radio segment of $16.0 million or 13%, offset by an
increase in our television segment net revenue of $5.3 million or 74%. Our radio segment had a
decrease in net revenue primarily due to lower local and national sales. The decrease in local
sales occurred primarily in our Miami, Los Angeles, Chicago and New York markets, offset by an
increase in our Puerto Rico market. The decrease in national sales occurred in our Miami, Chicago
and New York markets, offset by an increase in our Los Angeles market. Our television segment net
revenue growth was primarily due to increases in subscriber revenue related to the DIRECTV
affiliation agreements, local spot sales, barter sales, and local integrated sales.
Engineering and Programming Expenses. The increase in our consolidated engineering and
programming expenses of $6.9 million or 18% was due to increases in both our television and radio
segments. Our television segment expenses increased $4.2 million or 40%, primarily due to increases
in (a) original produced programming, (b) acquired programming licenses, (c) on-air promotions
related to newly produced or acquired shows, and (d) fiber link and transmitter line charges
related to the expansion of MegaTV outlets. Our radio segment expenses increased $2.7 million or
10%, primarily related to increases in (a) compensation and benefits for our radio programming
personnel related to new morning shows in our Puerto Rico, Chicago and Miami markets, (b) legal
settlement related to the Amigo Broadcasting litigation, (c) music license fees, and (d)
transmitter lines, rent and electricity expenses.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. The increase in our consolidated selling,
general and administrative expenses of $0.5 million or 1% was due to an increase in our television
segment. Our television segment expenses increased $3.1 million or 59%, primarily due to an
increase in advertising, promotional and marketing costs related to new shows, barter expense and
professional fees. Our radio segment expenses decreased $2.6 million or 5%, primarily due to a
decrease in sales commissions, taxes and licenses, and the allowance for doubtful account
provision.
Corporate Expenses. The decrease in corporate expenses was a result of a decrease in employee
compensation.
Depreciation and Amortization. The increase in our consolidated depreciation and amortization
expenses is directly related to the increase in capital expenditures throughout our company.
22
Table of Contents
Impairment of FCC Broadcasting Licenses and Restructuring Costs. As a result of our SFAS No.
142 impairment testing of our indefinite-lived intangible assets and goodwill, we recorded a
non-cash impairment loss of approximately $396.3 million related to the FCC broadcasting licenses
for certain individual stations in our Los Angeles, San Francisco, Puerto Rico, Miami and New York
markets. The impairment loss was due to market changes in estimates and assumptions which (a)
decreased advertising revenue growth projections for the broadcasting industry, and (b) increased
the discount rate. Also, the current decline in cash flow multiples for recent station sales were
considered in the estimates and assumptions used.
In addition, under a restructuring plan to reduce expenses throughout the Company, we incurred
costs totaling $2.2 million related to the terminations of programming contracts and personnel.
Operating (Loss) Income. The decrease in operating (loss) income was mainly due to the
impairment of FCC broadcasting licenses and restructuring costs of $398.5 million. Also
contributing to the decrease in operating (loss) income was an increase in our television
segments operating expenses and a decrease in our radio segments net revenue.
Interest Expense, net. The increase in interest expense, net, was due to a decrease in
interest income, resulting from a general decline in interest rates on our lower cash balances.
Change in Fair Value of Derivative Instrument. In September and October 2008, the counterparty
to one of our interest rate swaps, Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc., and its parent and
credit support provider, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., each filed for bankruptcy. Based on these
bankruptcy filings, we believe that these cash flow hedges no longer qualify for hedge accounting.
Therefore, the change in fair value from September 15, 2008, the last time this hedge was
determined to be effective, and to September 30, 2008, was $3.6 million, which was recorded in
earnings as a Change in fair value of derivative instrument.
Income Taxes. The income tax benefit of $98.2 million arose primarily from the impact of the
reduction of our deferred tax liabilities related to the impairment of our FCC broadcasting
licenses of approximately $109.2 million, offset by income tax
expense resulting from the tax amortization of our FCC broadcasting
licenses.
Net (Loss) Income. The decrease in net (loss) income was primarily due to the decrease in
operating (loss) income related primarily to the impairment of FCC broadcasting licenses and
restructuring costs, partially offset by its related income tax benefit.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash on hand ($34.0 million as of September 30, 2008),
cash expected to be provided by operations and any additional
proceeds from our existing revolving credit facility. Our
cash flow from operations is subject to such factors as shifts in
population, station listenership and viewership, demographics, audience
tastes and fluctuations in preferred advertising media. Our ability to raise funds by
increasing our indebtedness is limited by the terms of the certificates of designation governing
our Series B preferred stock and the credit agreement governing our senior secured credit facility.
Additionally, our certificates of designations and credit agreement each place restrictions on us
with respect to the sale of assets, liens, investments, dividends, debt repayments, capital
expenditures, transactions with affiliates and consolidations and mergers, among other things.
Management
continually projects anticipated cash requirements and believes that cash from operating activities, together with cash on hand, should be
sufficient to permit us to meet our operating obligations in the foreseeable future, including,
among other things, required quarterly interest and principal payments pursuant to the credit
agreements governing our senior secured credit facility due 2012, quarterly cash dividend payments
pursuant to the certificates of designation governing our Series B preferred stock, and capital
expenditures, excluding the acquisitions of FCC licenses. While not
significant to us to date, the disruptions in the capital and credit
markets may result in increased borrowing costs associated with our
short-term and long-term debts. Assumptions (none of which can be
assured) which underlie managements beliefs, include the following:
| the demand for advertising within the broadcasting industry and economic conditions in general will not continue to deteriorate further in any material respect; | ||
| we will continue to successfully implement our business strategy; and |
| we will not incur any material unforeseen liabilities, including environmental liabilities and legal judgments. |
Our strategy is to primarily utilize cash flows from operations to meet our capital needs and
contractual obligations.
23
Table of Contents
We continuously evaluate opportunities to make strategic acquisitions and/or dispositions,
primarily in the largest Hispanic markets in the United States. We engage in discussions regarding
potential acquisitions and/or dispositions from time to time in the ordinary course of business. We
anticipate that any future acquisitions would be financed through funds generated from permitted
debt financing, equity financing, operations, asset sales or a combination of these or other
available sources. However, there can be no assurance that financing from any of these sources, if
necessary and available, can be obtained on favorable terms for future acquisitions.
The following summary table presents a comparison of our capital resources for the nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, with respect to certain of our key measures affecting
our liquidity. The changes set forth in the table are discussed below. This section should be read
in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes.
Nine-Months Ended | ||||||||||||
September 30, | Change | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | $ | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures: |
||||||||||||
Radio |
2,643 | 1,358 | 1,285 | |||||||||
Television |
12,525 | 3,030 | 9,495 | |||||||||
Corporate |
423 | 2,343 | (1,920 | ) | ||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 15,591 | 6,731 | 8,860 | ||||||||
Net cash flows (used in) provided by operating activities |
$ | (1,607 | ) | 13,694 | (15,301 | ) | ||||||
Net cash flows used in investing activities |
(15,500 | ) | (6,716 | ) | (8,784 | ) | ||||||
Net cash flows used in financing activities |
(10,010 | ) | (9,983 | ) | (27 | ) | ||||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | (27,117 | ) | (3,005 | ) | |||||||
Capital Expenditures. The increase in our capital expenditures is a result of various
capital projects, including but not limited to the SBS Miami Broadcast Center that was completed in
the third quarter of 2008. We are estimating our capital expenditures for the fiscal year 2008 to
be in the range of $16.0 million to $18.0 million.
Net Cash Flows (Used In) Provided by Operating Activities. Changes in our net cash flows from
operating activities were primarily a result of the decrease in cash sales and an increase in cash
paid to vendors.
Net Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities. Changes in our net cash flows from investing
activities were primarily a result of the following: (a) in 2008, we continued to make improvements
to the SBS Miami Broadcast Center which was purchased in 2007; these improvements totaled $5.8
million and other capital expenditures totaled $9.8 million, and (b) in 2007, we acquired the SBS
Miami Broadcast Center and began making improvements to that building totaling $2.6 million and
other capital expenditures of $4.1 million.
Net Cash Flows Used In Financing Activities. There were no significant changes in our net cash
flows from financing activities.
Restructuring Costs
Under a restructuring plan to reduce expenses throughout the Company, we incurred costs
totaling $2.2 million related to the termination of various programming contracts and personnel.
We believe that the restructuring plan and other cost-cutting measures will likely result in cost
savings of approximately $11.0 to $13.0 million over the next twelve-months. This range excludes
savings from our significant reduction of cash advertising and marketing expenses. In addition, we
will continue to review other cost-cutting measures.
24
Table of Contents
Recent Developments
Draw Down of Revolving Credit Facility
On October 3, 2008, we requested to draw down $25.0 million from our $25.0 million revolver
facility under the senior secured credit facility agreement, dated as of June 10, 2005, among us,
Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, as syndication agent, Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as documentation agent, Lehman Commercial Paper Inc. (Lehman), as administrative
agent, and various lenders from time to time. On October 8, 2008, we only received an aggregate of
$15.0 million of the $25.0 million revolver as a result of Lehmans failure to fund its $10.0
million portion of the facility due to its bankruptcy filing.
The $15.0 million drawn on October 8, 2008 currently bears interest at a rate equal to 1.0%
over the base prime rate unless converted to a LIBOR-based term rate. As of October 8, 2008, the
applicable margin of the revolving credit facility was (i) 2.00% per annum for Eurodollar loans and
(ii) 1.00% per annum for base rate loans.
On October 24, 2008, the draw down on the revolver was used, with other funds, to repay the
non-interest bearing secured promissory note of $18.5 million. Please refer to the Early
Extinguishment of the $18.5 million Non-interest Bearing Promissory Note section below for further
details.
We are exploring options to replace Lehmans commitment within the revolver, but we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to obtain such replacement from others. However, we believe that we
have sufficient liquidity to conduct our normal operations and do not believe that the potential
reduction in available capacity under this revolver will have a material impact on our short-term
liquidity.
Dividend Payment on the Series B Preferred Stock
Under the terms of our Series B preferred stock, we are required to pay dividends at a rate of
10 3/4 % per year of the $1,000 liquidation preference per share of Series B preferred stock. From
October 30, 2003 to October 15, 2008, we had the option to pay these dividends in either cash or
additional shares of Series B preferred stock. On October
15, 2008, we paid our quarterly dividend in additional shares of our Series B preferred stock.
After October 15, 2008, we are required to pay the quarterly dividends on our Series B preferred
stock in cash.
NASDAQ Delisting Letter and Temporary Postponement
On October 22, 2008, we received a notification letter (the Letter) from The Nasdaq Stock
Market (NASDAQ), notifying us that NASDAQ has suspended, for a three-month period, effective
October 16, 2008, the enforcement of the rule requiring a minimum bid price and market value of
publicly held shares (the Rule). NASDAQ has said that it will not take any action to delist any
security for these concerns during the suspension period. NASDAQ has stated that, given the current
extraordinary market conditions, this suspension will remain in effect through Friday, January 16,
2009 and that the Rule will be reinstated on Monday, January 19, 2009, and the first relevant trade
date will be Tuesday, January 20, 2009.
We previously received a Staff Deficiency Letter from NASDAQ on August 20, 2008 indicating
that the minimum bid price of our common stock had fallen below $1.00 for 30 consecutive trading
days, and that it was therefore not in compliance with NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4450(b). The notice
further provided that in accordance with the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules, we would be provided 180
calendar days, or until February 17, 2009, to regain compliance with the minimum bid price
requirement.
We had 124 calendar days remaining in our compliance period as of October 16, 2008, the
effective date of NASDAQs suspension. Upon reinstatement of the rules on January 19, 2009, we will
have the same number of days remaining, or until May 26, 2009, to regain compliance. We may regain
compliance, either during the suspension or during the compliance period resuming after the
suspension, by achieving a $1.00 closing bid price for a minimum of 10 consecutive trading days.
During this interim period, our common stock is expected to continue to trade on The NASDAQ
Global Market. If compliance with Marketplace Rule 4450(b) cannot be demonstrated by May 26, 2009,
our common stock will be subject to delisting from The NASDAQ Global Market.
We intend to use all reasonable efforts to maintain the listing of our common stock on the
Nasdaq Global Market, but there can be no guarantee that we will regain compliance with the
continued listing requirements, or will be able to demonstrate a plan to sustain compliance in
order to avoid delisting from the Nasdaq Global Market.
25
Table of Contents
Early Extinguishment of the $18.5 million Non-interest Bearing Promissory Note
On October 24, 2008, we entered into a letter agreement with BC Media Funding Company II, LLC, as
agent for Media Funding Company, LLC, successors in interest to the rights of WDLP Broadcasting
Company, LLC and Robin Broadcasting Company, LLC, for the early extinguishment of the $18,500,000
non-interest bearing promissory note due January 2, 2009 (the Note).
Pursuant to the letter agreement, we received a discount of $150,000 and only paid $18,350,000 (the
Payoff Amount) in full satisfaction due under the Note. We used cash on hand and $15.0 million
of proceeds drawn down from the revolving credit facility to satisfy the Payoff Amount.
In addition, on October 24, 2008, we were released from all obligations and liabilities, security
interests, pledges, liens, mortgages, assignments or other interests granted by us and our
subsidiaries pursuant to the security agreement, the pledge agreement, the Note and any and all
documentation related to the loan documents.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have,
a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition,
revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Impact of Inflation
We believe that inflation has not had a material impact on our results of operations for the
nine-months ended
September 30, 2008. However, there can be no assurance that inflation will not have an adverse
impact on our future operating results and financial condition.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Interest Rate Risk. As part of our efforts to mitigate interest rate risk, on June 29, 2005,
we entered into a five year interest rate swap agreement that hedged (fixed) the interest rate,
based on LIBOR, on our current Eurodollar rate of our $313.6 million senior secured credit facility
term loan at an interest rate for five years at 4.23%, plus the applicable margin of 1.75%. This
swap agreement is intended to reduce our exposure to interest rate fluctuations and was not entered
into for speculative purposes.
Our exposure under our interest rate swap agreement reflects the cost of replacing an
agreement in the event of nonperformance by our counter party. In September and October 2008, the
counterparty to this swap agreement, Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. (Lehman
Brothers), and its parent and
credit support provider, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (Lehman
Holdings), each filed for bankruptcy, which
created a default under the swap agreement. As of September 30, 2008, the rate under this swap
agreement was unfavorable compared to the market. Therefore, we believe that interest rate risk is
not significant to our consolidated financial position or results of operations. We will continue
to evaluate swap rates as the market dictates and we are exploring our options that may be
available to us as a result of Lehman Holdings and Lehman
Brothers defaults under the swap agreement.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation
Of Disclosure Controls And Procedures. Our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act, to
ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in
the SECs rules and forms, and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
we are required to disclose in such reports is accumulated and communicated to management,
including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded, as a result of the material weakness in internal control over financial
reporting discussed below, that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of the
end of the period covered by this report. However, we believe that the financial statements
included in this report fairly present in all material respects our financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows for the periods presented.
26
Table of Contents
In November 2008, management concluded that a control deficiency with respect to the review
and verification of the accuracy of the calculation of the provision for income taxes constituted a
material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. This control deficiency resulted in
an adjustment to the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarter
ended September 30, 2008 affecting the provision for income taxes.
Management is in the process of reviewing and, as necessary, revising its policies and
procedures with respect to controls over the review and verification of the accuracy of the
calculation of the provision for income taxes to ensure that all reasonable steps will be taken to
correct this material weakness. As part of this process, management expects to add additional
review and controls, and improve the system applications used to calculate the provision for
income taxes. The deficiency will not be considered remediated until the new internal controls are
operational for a period of time and tested, and management concludes that the controls are
operating effectively.
Changes In Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have been no significant changes
in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this
report, other than the material weakness described above, that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
The information set forth under Note 8 contained in the Notes to Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is incorporated by
reference in answer to this Item.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you
should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, which could materially affect our
business, financial condition or future results. There have been no material changes from the risk
factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, but they
are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or
that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition and/or operating results.
Item 5. | Other Information |
The information set forth under Note 12 contained in the Notes to Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is incorporated by
reference in answer to this Item.
27
Table of Contents
Item 6. | Exhibits |
(a) Exhibits
The following exhibits, which are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K, are
filed herewith or, as noted, incorporated by reference herein:
Exhibit | ||||||
Number | Exhibit Description | |||||
3.1 | | Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (the
Company), dated September 29, 1999 (incorporated by reference to the Companys 1999
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Commission File No. 333-85499) (the 1999 Registration
Statement)) (Exhibit A to this exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K, dated March 25, 1996 (the 1996 Current Report). |
||||
3.2 | | Certificate of Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Company, dated September 29, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Companys 1999
Registration Statement). |
||||
3.3 | | Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the
Companys 1999 Registration Statement). |
||||
3.4 | | Certificate of Elimination of 141/4% Senior Exchangeable Preferred Stock, Series A of the
Company, dated October 28, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, dated November 14, 2003 (the 11/14/03 Quarterly Report)). |
||||
4.1 | | Article V of the Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated
September 29, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys 1999 Registration
Statement). |
||||
4.2 | | Certificate of Designations dated October 29, 2003 Setting Forth the Voting Power, Preferences
and Relative, Participating, Optional and Other Special Rights and Qualifications, Limitations
and Restrictions of the 103/4% Series A Cumulative Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock of
Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys
11/14/03 Quarterly Report). |
||||
4.3 | | Certificate of Designations dated October 29, 2003 Setting Forth the Voting Power, Preferences
and Relative, Participating, Optional and Other Special Rights and Qualifications, Limitations
and Restrictions of the 103/4% Series B Cumulative Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock of
Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Companys
11/14/03 Quarterly Report). |
||||
4.4 | | Indenture dated June 29, 1994 among the Company, IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as Trustee,
the Guarantors named therein and the Purchasers named therein (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys 1994 Registration Statement on Form S-4 (the 1994 Registration
Statement). |
||||
4.5 | | First Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 25, 1996 to the Indenture dated as of June 29,
1994 among the Company, the Guarantors named therein and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as
Trustee (incorporated by reference to the 1996 Current Report). |
||||
4.6 | | Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 1, 1997 to the Indenture dated as of June 29,
1994 among the Company, the Guarantors named therein and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as
Trustee (incorporated by reference to the 1996 Current Report). |
||||
4.7 | | Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 21, 1999 to the Indenture dated as of June 29, 1994
among the Company, the Guarantors named therein and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as Trustee
(incorporated by reference to the Companys 1999 Registration Statement). |
28
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||||||
Number | Exhibit Description | |||||
4.8 | | Indenture with respect to 95/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 with The Bank of New York as
Trustee, dated November 8, 1999 (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K
dated November 2, 1999 (the 1999 Current Report)). |
||||
4.9 | | Indenture with respect to 95/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 with the Bank of New York as
Trustee, dated June 8, 2001 (incorporated by reference to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-3, filed on June 25, 2001 (the 2001
Form S-3). |
||||
4.10 | | Form of stock certificate for the Class A common stock of the Company (incorporated by reference
to the Companys 1999 Registration Statement). |
||||
4.11 | | Certificate of Elimination of 141/4% of Senior Exchangeable Preferred Stock, Series A of the
Company, dated October 28, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 14, 2003). |
||||
4.12 | | Certificate of Designation Setting Forth the Voting Power, Preferences and Relative,
Participating, Optional and Other Special Rights and Qualifications, Limitations and Restrictions
of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company (Certificate of Designation of Series
C Preferred Stock) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on December 27, 2004). |
||||
4.13 | | Certificate of Correction to Certificate of Designation of Series C Preferred Stock of the
Company dated January 7, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 of the Companys Annual
Report filed on Form 10-K for the fiscal year 2004). |
||||
10.1 | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of August 4, 2008, by and between the Company
and Joseph A. García (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report
filed on Form 8-K filed on August 8, 2008). |
|||||
14.1 | | Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 of the Companys
Form 10-K for the fiscal year 2003). |
||||
31.1 | | Chief Executive Officers Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||||
31.2 | | Chief Financial Officers Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||||
32.1 | | Chief Executive Officers Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||||
32.2 | | Chief Financial Officers Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
29
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. |
||||
By: | /s/ JOSEPH A. GARCÍA | |||
JOSEPH A. GARCÍA | ||||
Chief Financial Officer, Chief
Administrative Officer, Senior Executive Vice President and Secretary (principal financial and accounting officer and duly authorized officer of the registrant) |
||||
Date: November 10, 2008
30
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||||||
Number | Exhibit Description | |||||
3.1 | | Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (the
Company), dated September 29, 1999 (incorporated by reference to the Companys 1999
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Commission File No. 333-85499) (the 1999 Registration
Statement)) (Exhibit A to this exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K, dated March 25, 1996 (the 1996 Current Report). |
||||
3.2 | | Certificate of Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Company, dated September 29, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Companys 1999
Registration Statement). |
||||
3.3 | | Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the
Companys 1999 Registration Statement). |
||||
3.4 | | Certificate of Elimination of 141/4% Senior Exchangeable Preferred Stock, Series A of the
Company, dated October 28, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, dated November 14, 2003 (the 11/14/03 Quarterly Report)). |
||||
4.1 | | Article V of the Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated
September 29, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys 1999 Registration
Statement). |
||||
4.2 | | Certificate of Designations dated October 29, 2003 Setting Forth the Voting Power, Preferences
and Relative, Participating, Optional and Other Special Rights and Qualifications, Limitations
and Restrictions of the 103/4% Series A Cumulative Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock of
Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys
11/14/03 Quarterly Report). |
||||
4.3 | | Certificate of Designations dated October 29, 2003 Setting Forth the Voting Power, Preferences
and Relative, Participating, Optional and Other Special Rights and Qualifications, Limitations
and Restrictions of the 103/4% Series B Cumulative Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock of
Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Companys
11/14/03 Quarterly Report). |
||||
4.4 | | Indenture dated June 29, 1994 among the Company, IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as Trustee,
the Guarantors named therein and the Purchasers named therein (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys 1994 Registration Statement on Form S-4 (the 1994 Registration
Statement). |
||||
4.5 | | First Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 25, 1996 to the Indenture dated as of June 29,
1994 among the Company, the Guarantors named therein and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as
Trustee (incorporated by reference to the 1996 Current Report). |
||||
4.6 | | Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 1, 1997 to the Indenture dated as of June 29,
1994 among the Company, the Guarantors named therein and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as
Trustee (incorporated by reference to the 1996 Current Report). |
||||
4.7 | | Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 21, 1999 to the Indenture dated as of June 29, 1994
among the Company, the Guarantors named therein and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as Trustee
(incorporated by reference to the Companys 1999 Registration Statement). |
||||
4.8 | | Indenture with respect to 95/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 with The Bank of New York as
Trustee, dated November 8, 1999 (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K
dated November 2, 1999 (the 1999 Current Report)). |
31
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||||||
Number | Exhibit Description | |||||
4.9 | | Indenture with respect to 95/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 with the Bank of New York as
Trustee, dated June 8, 2001 (incorporated by reference to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-3, filed on June 25, 2001 (the 2001 Form S-3). |
||||
4.10 | | Form of stock certificate for the Class A common stock of the Company (incorporated by reference
to the Companys 1999 Registration Statement). |
||||
4.11 | | Certificate of Elimination of 141/4% of Senior Exchangeable Preferred Stock, Series A of the
Company, dated October 28, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 14, 2003). |
||||
4.12 | | Certificate of Designation Setting Forth the Voting Power, Preferences and Relative,
Participating, Optional and Other Special Rights and Qualifications, Limitations and Restrictions
of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company (Certificate of Designation of Series
C Preferred Stock) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on December 27, 2004). |
||||
4.13 | | Certificate of Correction to Certificate of Designation of Series C Preferred Stock of the
Company dated January 7, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 of the Companys Annual
Report filed on Form 10-K for the fiscal year 2004). |
||||
10.1 | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of August 4, 2008, by and between the Company
and Joseph A. García (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report
filed on Form 8-K filed on August 8, 2008). |
|||||
14.1 | | Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 of the Companys
Form 10-K for the fiscal year 2003). |
||||
31.1 | | Chief Executive Officers Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||||
31.2 | | Chief Financial Officers Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||||
32.1 | | Chief Executive Officers Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||||
32.2 | | Chief Financial Officers Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||||
32