SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM INC - Quarter Report: 2009 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 33-82114
Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 13-3827791 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
2601 South Bayshore Drive, PH II
Coconut Grove, Florida 33133
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Coconut Grove, Florida 33133
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(305) 441-6901
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ
No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company þ | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of November 11, 2009, 41,540,847 shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per
share, 23,403,500 shares of Class B common stock, par value $0.0001 per share and 380,000 shares of
Series C convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share, which are convertible into
7,600,000 shares of Class A common stock, were outstanding.
SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC.
INDEX
INDEX
- 2 -
Table of Contents
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains both historical and forward-looking
statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be,
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking
statements are not based on historical facts, but rather reflect our current expectations
concerning future results and events. These forward-looking statements generally can be identified
by the use of statements that include phrases such as believe, expect, anticipate, intend,
estimate, plan, project, foresee, likely, will or other words or phrases with similar
meanings. Similarly, statements that describe our objectives, plans or goals are, or may be,
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to
be different from any future results, performance and anticipated achievements expressed or implied
by these statements. We do not intend to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In addition, forward-looking
statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from our historical experience and our present expectations or projections. These risks
and uncertainties include, but are not limited to those described in this report, in Part II, Item
1A. Risk Factors and elsewhere in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008, and those described from time to time in our future reports filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC).
- 3 -
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements Unaudited |
SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(In thousands, except share data) | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 45,768 | 32,852 | |||||
Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,302 in 2009 and $1,675 in 2008 |
28,897 | 27,580 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
3,765 | 4,426 | ||||||
Total current assets |
78,430 | 64,858 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $46,745 in 2009 and $43,567 in 2008 |
48,183 | 52,411 | ||||||
FCC broadcasting licenses |
321,101 | 331,224 | ||||||
Goodwill |
32,806 | 32,806 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $205 in 2009 and $178 in 2008 |
1,229 | 1,256 | ||||||
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $4,760 in 2009 and $3,956 in 2008 |
2,841 | 3,646 | ||||||
Other assets |
2,272 | 3,066 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 486,862 | 489,267 | |||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Deficit |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
$ | 16,647 | 15,428 | |||||
Accrued interest |
7,952 | 486 | ||||||
Unearned revenue |
467 | 560 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
51 | 66 | ||||||
Derivative instruments |
8,205 | | ||||||
Senior credit facility revolver due 2010 |
15,000 | | ||||||
Current portion of the senior credit facility term loan due 2012 |
3,250 | 3,250 | ||||||
Current portion of other long-term debt |
445 | 438 | ||||||
Series B cumulative exchangeable redeemable preferred stock dividends payable |
4,550 | 2,068 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
56,567 | 22,296 | ||||||
Other liabilities, less current portion |
104 | 139 | ||||||
Derivative instruments |
651 | 12,541 | ||||||
Senior credit facility revolver due 2010 |
| 15,000 | ||||||
Senior credit facility term loan due 2012, less current portion |
307,125 | 309,563 | ||||||
Other long-term debt, less current portion |
6,718 | 7,052 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
69,930 | 68,082 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
441,095 | 434,673 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (note 7) |
||||||||
Cumulative exchangeable redeemable preferred stock: |
||||||||
103/4% Series B cumulative exchangeable redeemable preferred stock, $0.01 par value,
liquidation value $1,000 per share. Authorized 280,000 shares; 92,349 shares issued and
outstanding at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively |
92,349 | 92,349 | ||||||
Stockholders deficit: |
||||||||
Series C convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value and liquidation value. Authorized 600,000 shares;
380,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively |
4 | 4 | ||||||
Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value. Authorized 100,000,000 shares; 41,540,847 and 41,445,222
shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively |
4 | 4 | ||||||
Class B common stock, $0.0001 par value. Authorized 50,000,000 shares; 23,403,500
shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively |
2 | 2 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
524,936 | 524,722 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(3,838 | ) | (8,187 | ) | ||||
Accumulated deficit |
(567,690 | ) | (554,300 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders deficit |
(46,582 | ) | (37,755 | ) | ||||
Total liabilities and stockholders deficit |
$ | 486,862 | 489,267 | |||||
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 4 -
Table of Contents
SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
Three-Months Ended | Nine-Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenue |
$ | 38,582 | 41,253 | 103,428 | 122,866 | |||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Engineering and programming |
9,591 | 13,992 | 31,830 | 44,110 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
12,775 | 16,585 | 36,600 | 53,797 | ||||||||||||
Corporate expenses |
2,372 | 2,707 | 7,545 | 9,972 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,574 | 1,792 | 4,737 | 4,596 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
26,312 | 35,076 | 80,712 | 112,475 | ||||||||||||
Gain on the disposal of assets, net |
(14 | ) | (5 | ) | (29 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||
Impairment of FCC broadcasting licenses and restructuring costs |
| 2,199 | 10,686 | 398,451 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
12,284 | 3,983 | 12,059 | (388,050 | ) | |||||||||||
Other (expense) income: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(6,723 | ) | (5,686 | ) | (19,841 | ) | (16,085 | ) | ||||||||
Change in fair value of derivative instrument |
958 | 3,585 | 3,448 | 3,585 | ||||||||||||
Other, net |
| | 1 | 1,928 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
6,519 | 1,882 | (4,333 | ) | (398,622 | ) | ||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
1,976 | 2,325 | 1,611 | (98,207 | ) | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
4,543 | (443 | ) | (5,944 | ) | (300,415 | ) | |||||||||
Dividends on Series B preferred stock |
(2,482 | ) | (2,417 | ) | (7,446 | ) | (7,251 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) applicable to
common stockholders |
$ | 2,061 | (2,860 | ) | (13,390 | ) | (307,666 | ) | ||||||||
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share |
$ | 0.03 | (0.04 | ) | (0.18 | ) | (4.25 | ) | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
72,515 | 72,418 | 72,507 | 72,409 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
72,555 | 72,418 | 72,507 | 72,409 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 5 -
Table of Contents
SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Deficit
and Comprehensive Loss for the Nine-Months Ended September 30, 2009
and Comprehensive Loss for the Nine-Months Ended September 30, 2009
Class C | Class A | Class B | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
preferred stock | common stock | common stock | Additional | other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Par | Number of | Par | Number of | Par | paid-in | comprehensive | Accumulated | stockholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
shares | value | shares | value | shares | value | capital | loss | deficit | deficit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
380,000 | $ | 4 | 41,445,222 | $ | 4 | 23,403,500 | $ | 2 | $ | 524,722 | $ | (8,187 | ) | $ | (554,300 | ) | $ | (37,755 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Class A common stock from
vesting of restricted stock |
| | 95,625 | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | | | | | 214 | | | 214 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Series B preferred stock dividends |
| | | | | | | | (7,446 | ) | (7,446 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | | | | (5,944 | ) | (5,944 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts reclassified to earnings during the period |
| | | | | | | 4,112 | | 4,112 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments |
| | | | | | | 237 | | 237 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss |
(1,595 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
380,000 | $ | 4 | 41,540,847 | $ | 4 | 23,403,500 | $ | 2 | $ | 524,936 | $ | (3,838 | ) | $ | (567,690 | ) | $ | (46,582 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 6 -
Table of Contents
SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Nine-Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (5,944 | ) | (300,415 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||
Gain on the sale of assets |
(29 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||
Impairment of FCC broadcasting licenses |
10,123 | 398,451 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
214 | 600 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,737 | 4,596 | ||||||
Net barter income |
(370 | ) | (144 | ) | ||||
Provision for trade doubtful accounts |
335 | 717 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
805 | 826 | ||||||
Amortization of non-interest bearing promissory note payable |
| 1,047 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
1,848 | (98,350 | ) | |||||
Unearned revenue |
116 | (1,731 | ) | |||||
Accretion of the time-value of money component related to unearned revenue |
| 122 | ||||||
Change in fair value of derivative instrument |
664 | (3,403 | ) | |||||
Amortization of deferred commitment fee |
| (56 | ) | |||||
Amortization of other liabilities |
(50 | ) | (50 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Trade receivables |
(1,491 | ) | 5,628 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
661 | (3,585 | ) | |||||
Other assets |
794 | (933 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
1,355 | (5,579 | ) | |||||
Unearned revenue |
| 617 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
7,466 | 45 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
21,234 | (1,607 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(815 | ) | (9,763 | ) | ||||
Acquisition of a building and its related building improvements |
| (5,828 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment |
226 | | ||||||
Proceeds from an insurance recovery |
| 91 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(589 | ) | (15,500 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Payment of senior secured credit facility term loan 2012 |
(2,438 | ) | (2,438 | ) | ||||
Payment of Series B preferred stock cash dividends |
(4,964 | ) | (7,251 | ) | ||||
Payments of other long-term debt |
(327 | ) | (321 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(7,729 | ) | (10,010 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
12,916 | (27,117 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
32,852 | 61,122 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 45,768 | 34,005 | |||||
Supplemental cash flows information: |
||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 7,467 | 14,893 | |||||
Income taxes paid, net |
29 | 22 | ||||||
Noncash investing and financing activities: |
||||||||
Accrual of Series B preferred stock cash dividend not declared |
$ | 4,550 | | |||||
Accrual of Series B preferred stock as payment of preferred stock dividend |
$ | | 2,014 | |||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments |
$ | 237 | (4,460 | ) | ||||
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 7 -
Table of Contents
SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Basis of Presentation
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Spanish
Broadcasting System, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company, we, us, our or SBS). All intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The accompanying unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 and for
the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 have been prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. They do not
include all information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. These
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements as of, and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, included
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements contain all adjustments, which are all of a normal and recurring nature, necessary for a
fair presentation of the results of the interim periods. We evaluated subsequent events after the
balance sheet date of September 30, 2009 through the financial statements issuance date of November
12, 2009. The results of operations for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009
are not necessarily indicative of the results for a full year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions about future events that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and
related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Significant items
subject to such estimates and assumptions include; the useful lives of fixed assets, allowance for doubtful accounts,
the valuation of derivatives, deferred tax assets, fixed assets, intangible assets, stock-based compensation,
contingencies and litigation. These estimates and assumptions are based on managements best judgments. Management
evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including
the current economic environment, which management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Management
adjusts such estimates and assumptions as facts and circumstances dictate. Illiquid credit markets, volatile equity
markets and reductions in advertising spending have combined to increase the uncertainty inherent in such estimates and
assumptions. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
2. Stockholders Deficit
(a) Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
On December 23, 2004, in connection with the closing of the merger agreement, dated
October 5, 2004, with CBS Radio (formerly known as Infinity Media Corporation, CBS Radio), a
division of CBS Corporation, Infinity Broadcasting Corporation of San Francisco (Infinity SF) and
SBS Bay Area, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of SBS (SBS Bay Area), we issued to CBS Radio an
aggregate of 380,000 shares of Series C convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share (the
Series C preferred stock), each of which is convertible at the option of the holder into twenty
fully paid and non-assessable shares of our Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value per share (the
Class A common stock).
Under the terms of the certificate of designation governing the Series C preferred stock,
the holder of the Series C preferred stock has the right to convert each share into twenty fully
paid and non-assessable shares of our Class A common stock. The shares of Series C preferred stock
issued at the closing of the merger are convertible into 7,600,000 shares of our Class A common
stock, subject to adjustment.
In connection with the closing of the merger transaction, we also entered into a
registration rights agreement with CBS Radio, pursuant to which, CBS Radio may instruct us to file
up to three registration statements, on a best efforts basis, with the SEC providing for the
registration for resale of the Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series C
preferred stock.
We are required to pay holders of Series C preferred stock dividends on parity with our
Class A common stock and Class B common stock, $0.0001 par value per share (the Class B common
stock), and each other class or series of our capital stock, if created, after December 23, 2004.
(b) Class A and B Common Stock
The rights of the holders of shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock are
identical, except for voting rights and conversion provisions. The Class A common stock is entitled
to one vote per share and the Class B common stock is entitled to ten votes per share. The Class B
common stock is convertible to Class A common stock on a share-for-share basis at the option of the
holder at any time, or automatically upon the transfer to a person or entity which is not a
permitted transferee. Holders of each class of common stock are entitled to receive dividends and,
upon liquidation or dissolution, are entitled to receive all assets available for distribution to
stockholders. The holders of each class have no preemptive or other subscription rights and there
are no redemption or sinking fund provisions with respect to such shares. Each class of common
stock is subordinate to our 10 3/4 % Series B cumulative exchangeable redeemable preferred stock, par
value $0.01 per share and liquidation preference of $1,000 per share (the Series B preferred stock)
and on parity with the Series C preferred stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon
liquidation, winding up and dissolution of SBS.
(c) Share-Based Compensation Plans
2006 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan
In July 2006, we adopted an omnibus equity compensation plan (the Omnibus Plan) in which
grants can be made to participants in any of the following forms: (i) incentive stock options,
(ii) non-qualified stock options, (iii) stock appreciation rights, (iv) stock units, (v) stock
awards, (vi) dividend equivalents, and (vii) other stock-based awards. The Omnibus Plan authorizes
up to 3,500,000 shares of our Class A common stock for issuance, subject to adjustment in certain
circumstances. The Omnibus Plan provides that the maximum aggregate number of shares of Class A
common stock that may be granted, other than dividend equivalents, to any
individual during any calendar year is 1,000,000 shares, subject to adjustments. In addition, the
maximum aggregate number of shares of Class A common stock with respect to grants of stock units,
stock awards and other stock-based awards that may be granted to any individual during a calendar
year is also 1,000,000 shares, subject to adjustments.
- 8 -
Table of Contents
1999 Stock Option Plans
In September 1999, we adopted an employee incentive stock option plan (the 1999 ISO Plan)
and a non-employee director stock option plan (the 1999 NQ Plan, and together with the 1999 ISO
Plan, the 1999 Stock Option Plans). Options granted under the 1999 ISO Plan will vest according to
terms to be determined by the compensation committee of our board of directors, and will have a
contractual life of up to 10 years from the date of grant. Options granted under the 1999 NQ Plan
will vest 20% upon grant and 20% each year for the first four years from the date of grant. All
options granted under the 1999 ISO Plan and the 1999 NQ Plan vest immediately upon a change in
control of SBS, as defined therein. A total of 3,000,000 shares and 300,000 shares of Class A
common stock were reserved for issuance under the 1999 ISO Plan and the 1999 NQ Plan, respectively.
In September 2009, our 1999 Stock Options Plans expired; therefore, no more options can be granted
under these plans. Additionally, on November 2, 1999, we granted a stock option to purchase
250,000 shares of Class A common stock to a former director. This option vested immediately, and
expired on November 2, 2009.
Stock Options
Stock options have only been granted to employees and directors under our 1999 Stock
Option Plans. Our stock options have various vesting schedules and are subject to the employees
continuing their service to SBS. We recognize compensation expense based on the estimated grant
date fair value using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and recognize the compensation expense
using a straight-line amortization method. When estimating forfeitures, we consider voluntary
termination behaviors, as well as trends of actual option forfeitures. Ultimately, our stock-based
compensation expense is based on awards that vest. Our stock-based compensation has been reduced
for estimated forfeitures.
A summary of the status of our stock options, as of December 31, 2008 and September 30,
2009, and changes during the nine-months ended September 30, 2009, is presented below (in
thousands, except per share data):
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | |||||||||||||||
Average | Aggregate | Remaining | ||||||||||||||
Exercise | Intrinsic | Contractual | ||||||||||||||
Shares | Price | Value | Life (Years) | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
2,747 | $ | 10.17 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
| | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
| | ||||||||||||||
Forfeited |
(85 | ) | 8.38 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2009 |
2,662 | $ | 10.23 | $ | | 3.6 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at September 30, 2009 |
2,584 | $ | 10.49 | $ | | 3.5 | ||||||||||
During the nine-months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, no stock options were
exercised; therefore, no cash payments were received. In addition, we did not recognize a tax
benefit on our stock-based compensation expense due to our valuation allowance on substantially all
of our deferred tax assets.
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at
September 30, 2009 (in thousands, except per share data):
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding | Average | Exercisable | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Remaining | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Contractual | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unvested | Exercise | Life | Number | Exercise | ||||||||||||||||||||
Range of Exercise Prices | Vested Options | Options | Price | (Years) | Exercisable | Price | ||||||||||||||||||
$0.20 4.99 |
522 | 78 | $ | 2.49 | 7.1 | 522 | $ | 2.64 | ||||||||||||||||
5.00 9.99 |
1,159 | | 8.19 | 3.7 | 1,159 | 8.19 | ||||||||||||||||||
10.00 14.99 |
198 | | 10.79 | 5.0 | 198 | 10.79 | ||||||||||||||||||
15.00 20.00 |
705 | | 20.00 | 0.1 | 705 | 20.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
2,584 | 78 | $ | 10.23 | 3.6 | 2,584 | $ | 10.49 | |||||||||||||||||
Nonvested Shares
Nonvested shares (restricted stock or restricted stock units) are awarded to employees
under our Omnibus Plan. In general, nonvested shares will vest over three to five years and are
subject to the employees continuing their service to us. The cost of nonvested shares is determined
using the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant. The compensation expense is
recognized over the vesting period.
- 9 -
Table of Contents
A summary of the status of our nonvested shares, as of December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2009, and changes during the nine-months ended September 30, 2009, is presented below
(in thousands, except per share data):
Weighted | ||||||||
Average Grant- | ||||||||
Date Fair Value | ||||||||
Shares | (per Share) | |||||||
Nonvested at December 31, 2008 |
225 | $ | 1.75 | |||||
Awarded |
| | ||||||
Vested |
(96 | ) | 1.77 | |||||
Forfeited |
| | ||||||
Nonvested at September 30, 2009 |
129 | $ | 1.74 | |||||
3. Basic and Diluted Net (Loss) Income Per Common Share
Basic net (loss) income per common share was computed by dividing net (loss) income
applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and
convertible preferred stock outstanding for each period presented, using the if converted method.
Diluted net (loss) income per common share is computed by giving effect to common stock equivalents
as if they were outstanding for the entire period.
During the three-month period ended September 30, 2009, common stock equivalents included
in the calculation amounted to 40 thousand for the period. Common stock equivalents were not
considered in the calculation for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 and for the three-
and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008, since their effect would be anti-dilutive. If
included, the common stock equivalents for these periods would have amounted to six thousand, zero,
and zero, respectively.
- 10 -
Table of Contents
4. Operating Segments
We have two reportable segments: radio and television. The following summary table
presents separate financial data for each of our operating segments (in thousands):
Three-Months Ended | Nine-Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | Change | September 30, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | $ | % | 2009 | 2008 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 34,558 | 36,411 | (1,853 | ) | (5 | %) | 91,923 | 110,445 | (18,522 | ) | (17 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||
Television |
4,024 | 4,842 | (818 | ) | (17 | %) | 11,505 | 12,421 | (916 | ) | (7 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 38,582 | 41,253 | (2,671 | ) | (6 | %) | 103,428 | 122,866 | (19,438 | ) | (16 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||
Engineering and programming expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 6,478 | 9,438 | (2,960 | ) | (31 | %) | 20,973 | 29,590 | (8,617 | ) | (29 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||
Television |
3,113 | 4,554 | (1,441 | ) | (32 | %) | 10,857 | 14,520 | (3,663 | ) | (25 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 9,591 | 13,992 | (4,401 | ) | (31 | %) | 31,830 | 44,110 | (12,280 | ) | (28 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 10,902 | 13,579 | (2,677 | ) | (20 | %) | 30,357 | 45,449 | (15,092 | ) | (33 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||
Television |
1,873 | 3,006 | (1,133 | ) | (38 | %) | 6,243 | 8,348 | (2,105 | ) | (25 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 12,775 | 16,585 | (3,810 | ) | (23 | %) | 36,600 | 53,797 | (17,197 | ) | (32 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporate expenses: |
$ | 2,372 | 2,707 | (335 | ) | (12 | %) | 7,545 | 9,972 | (2,427 | ) | (24 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 781 | 817 | (36 | ) | (4 | %) | 2,374 | 2,397 | (23 | ) | (1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||
Television |
556 | 578 | (22 | ) | (4 | %) | 1,646 | 1,022 | 624 | 61 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
237 | 397 | (160 | ) | (40 | %) | 717 | 1,177 | (460 | ) | (39 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 1,574 | 1,792 | (218 | ) | (12 | %) | 4,737 | 4,596 | 141 | 3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on the disposal of assets, net: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | (6 | ) | (5 | ) | (1 | ) | 20 | % | (26 | ) | (10 | ) | (16 | ) | 160 | % | |||||||||||||||
Television |
| | | 0 | % | 19 | | 19 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
(8 | ) | | (8 | ) | 100 | % | (22 | ) | | (22 | ) | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | (14 | ) | (5 | ) | (9 | ) | 180 | % | (29 | ) | (10 | ) | (19 | ) | 190 | % | |||||||||||||||
Impairment of FCC broadcasting licenses and
restructuring costs: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | | 2,191 | (2,191 | ) | (100 | %) | 10,614 | 381,606 | (370,992 | ) | (97 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||
Television |
| 8 | (8 | ) | (100 | %) | 24 | 16,845 | (16,821 | ) | (100 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
| | | 100 | % | 48 | | 48 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | | 2,199 | (2,199 | ) | (100 | %) | 10,686 | 398,451 | (387,765 | ) | (97 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating (loss) income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 16,403 | 10,391 | 6,012 | 58 | % | 27,631 | (348,587 | ) | 376,218 | (108 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Television |
(1,518 | ) | (3,304 | ) | 1,786 | (54 | %) | (7,284 | ) | (28,314 | ) | 21,030 | (74 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
(2,601 | ) | (3,104 | ) | 503 | (16 | %) | (8,288 | ) | (11,149 | ) | 2,861 | (26 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 12,284 | 3,983 | 8,301 | 208 | % | 12,059 | (388,050 | ) | 400,109 | (103 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 34 | 326 | (292 | ) | (90 | %) | 428 | 2,643 | (2,215 | ) | (84 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||
Television |
214 | 2,826 | (2,612 | ) | (92 | %) | 338 | 12,525 | (12,187 | ) | (97 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
20 | 60 | (40 | ) | (67 | %) | 49 | 423 | (374 | ) | (88 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 268 | 3,212 | (2,944 | ) | (92 | %) | 815 | 15,591 | (14,776 | ) | (95 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Total Assets: |
||||||||
Radio |
$ | 425,101 | 422,827 | |||||
Television |
54,386 | 57,225 | ||||||
Corporate |
7,375 | 9,215 | ||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 486,862 | 489,267 | |||||
- 11 -
Table of Contents
5. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Our total comprehensive income (loss), comprised of net income (loss), amounts
reclassified to earnings during the period, and unrealized (loss) gain on derivative instruments,
for the three- and nine-months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, was as follows (in
thousands):
Three-Months Ended | Nine-Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 4,543 | (443 | ) | (5,944 | ) | (300,415 | ) | ||||||||
Other comprehensive loss: |
||||||||||||||||
Amounts reclassified to earnings during the period |
1,421 | | 4,112 | |||||||||||||
Unrealized (loss) gain on derivative instruments |
(122 | ) | (3,200 | ) | 237 | (4,460 | ) | |||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 5,842 | (3,643 | ) | (1,595 | ) | (304,875 | ) | ||||||||
6. Income Taxes
We have determined that due to a number of reasons, we are no longer able to estimate our
annual effective tax rate during our interim periods, which would be applied to our pre-tax
ordinary income. We are calculating our effective income tax rate using a year to date income tax
calculation. Our income tax expense differs from the statutory federal tax rate of 35% and related
statutory state tax rates, primarily as a result of the reversal of our deferred tax liabilities
related to our intangible assets, which could no longer be assured over our net operating loss
carry forward period. Therefore, our effective tax rate is impacted by the establishment of a
valuation allowance on substantially all of our deferred tax assets.
We file federal, state and local income tax returns in the United States and Puerto Rico.
The tax years that remain subject to assessment of additional liabilities by the United States
federal, state, and local tax authorities are 2005 through 2008. The tax years that remain subject
to assessment of additional liabilities by the Puerto Rico tax authority are 2004 through 2008.
Based on our evaluation, we have concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax
positions requiring recognition in our consolidated financial statements, as of September 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008.
7. Litigation
We are subject to certain legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary
course of business and have not been fully adjudicated. In our opinion, we do not have a potential
liability related to any current legal proceedings and claims that would individually or in the
aggregate have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or operating results. However,
the results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. Should we fail to prevail in
any of these legal matters or should all of these legal matters be resolved against us in the same
reporting period, the operating results of a particular reporting period could be materially
adversely affected.
Wolf, et al., Litigation
There is a pending litigation claim against us, certain of our former and current directors
and officers concerning which such directors and officers may seek indemnification. On November 28,
2001, a complaint was filed against us in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York (the Southern District of New York) and was amended on April 19, 2002. The
amended complaint alleges that the named plaintiff, Mitchell Wolf, purchased shares of our Class A
common stock pursuant to the October 27, 1999, prospectus and registration statement relating to
our initial public offering which closed on November 2, 1999 (the IPO). The complaint was brought
on behalf of Mr. Wolf and an alleged class of similarly situated purchasers against us, eight
underwriters and/or their successors-in-interest who led or otherwise participated in our IPO, two
members of our senior management team, one of whom is our Chairman of the Board of Directors, and
an additional director, referred to collectively as the individual defendants. The complaint was
never served upon the individual defendants.
This case is one of more than 300 similar cases brought by similar counsel against more than
300 issuers, 40 underwriters and 1,000 individual defendants alleging, in general, violations of
federal securities laws in connection with initial public offerings, in particular, failing to
disclose that the underwriters allegedly solicited and received additional, excessive and
undisclosed commissions from certain investors in exchange for which they allocated to those
investors material portions of the restricted shares issued in connection with each offering. All
of these cases, including the one involving us, have been assigned for consolidated pretrial
purposes to one judge of the Southern District of New York. The issuer defendants in the
consolidated cases (collectively, the Issuer Defendants) filed motions to dismiss the consolidated
cases. These motions to dismiss covered issues common among all Issuer Defendants and issues common
among all underwriter defendants (collectively, the Underwriter Defendants) in the consolidated
cases. As a result of these motions, the Individual Defendants were dismissed from one of the
claims against them, specifically the Section 10b-5 claim. On September 21, 2007, Kaye Scholer LLP,
on behalf of the individual defendants, executed a tolling agreement with plaintiffs providing for
the dismissal without prejudice of all claims against the individual defendants upon the provision
to plaintiffs of documentation showing that SBS has entity coverage for the period in question.
Documentation of such coverage was subsequently provided to plaintiffs on December 19, 2007.
On August 31, 2005, the Southern District of New York issued an order of preliminary approval
of a settlement proposal among the investors in the plaintiff class, the issuer defendants
(including us) and the issuer defendants insurance carriers (the Issuers Settlement). The
principal components of the Issuers Settlement were: 1) a release of all claims against the issuer
defendants and their directors, officers and certain other related parties arising out of the
alleged wrongful conduct in the amended complaint; 2) the assignment to the plaintiffs of certain
of the issuer defendants potential claims against the Underwriters; and 3) a guarantee by the
insurers to the plaintiffs of the difference between $1.0 billion and any lesser amount recovered
by the plaintiffs from the Underwriter Defendants. The payments were to be charged to each issuer
defendants insurance policy on a pro rata basis.
- 12 -
Table of Contents
On October 13, 2004, the Southern District of New York granted plaintiffs motion for class
certification in six focus cases out of the more than 300 consolidated class actions, but on
December 5, 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (the Second Circuit)
reversed the order, holding that plaintiffs could not satisfy the predominance requirement for a
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b) (3) class action. On June 25, 2007, in light of the Second
Circuits reversal of the class certification order and its subsequent denial of plaintiffs
petition for a rehearing or rehearing en banc, the Southern District of New York entered a
stipulation between plaintiffs and the Issuer Defendants, terminating the proposed Issuers
Settlement which the Southern District of New York had preliminarily approved on August 31, 2005.
On September 27, 2007, plaintiffs filed a renewed motion for class certification with respect to
the six focus cases, based on newly proposed class definitions. On October 10, 2008, at plaintiffs
request, the Southern District of New York ordered the withdrawal without prejudice of plaintiffs
renewed motion, which had been fully briefed and was sub judice.
On August 14, 2007, plaintiffs filed amended complaints in the six focus cases and amended
master allegations in the consolidated actions. On November 13, 2007, the Underwriter Defendants
and Issuer Defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaints in the six focus cases. On March
26, 2008, the Southern District of New York granted in part the motion as to a subset of
plaintiffs Section 11 claims, but denied the motion as to plaintiffs other claims. We are not
named in any of the six focus cases.
On January 7, 2008, the Underwriter Defendants filed a motion (in which the issuer defendants
joined) to strike class allegations in 26 of the consolidated cases, including the case against us,
on the ground that plaintiffs lacked a putative class representative in those cases at the time of
their May 30, 2007 oral motion.
On May 13, 2008, the Southern District of New York issued an order granting the motion in part
and striking certain of the class allegations relating to the Section 10b-5 claims in 8 of the 26
actions, including the action against us. The order also requires plaintiffs to make certain
disclosures with respect to the putative class representatives in the remaining 18 actions. Once
the disclosures are filed, Defendants may seek clarification of the Southern District of New Yorks
May 13, 2008 order with respect to the status of the remaining 10b-5-related class allegations in
the other 8 actions, including the action against us, as well as the status of the Section
11-related class allegations.
On June 11, 2009, pursuant to a motion filed on April 2, 2009, the Southern District of New
York issued a preliminary order of approval of a settlement of all of the consolidated cases,
including the case against us. On September 19, 2009, the Southern District of New York conducted
a hearing regarding the final approval of the settlement of all consolidated cases and, on October
5, 2009, issued an opinion finally approving the settlement. The settlement, which is subject to
appeal, will result in a release of all claims against the Underwriter and Issuer Defendants, and
their officers and directors (the settling defendants), in exchange for an aggregate sum of
approximately $600 million (the settlement amount) to be paid into a settlement fund for the
benefit of the class plaintiffs. SBS and the individual defendants share of the settlement amount
would be fully funded by insurance. On October 23, 2009, a petition for leave to appeal the
Southern District of New Yorks class definition for purposes of settlement was filed by
Fensterstock & Partners LLP on behalf of Objectors Lester Baum, Mike Hart, and Sue Shadley.
Plaintiffs plan to file an opposition to the petition, in which the Issuers and Underwriter
Defendants may join. Based on the current developments, we believe that it is unlikely that this
litigation will result in any material liability to us or the individual defendants that would not
be covered by existing insurance.
8. Impairment of FCC Broadcasting Licenses and Restructuring Costs
FCC Broadcasting Licenses
We generally perform our annual impairment test of our indefinite-lived intangibles
during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year but, given the deteriorating economic conditions and
revenue declines in the broadcasting industry, we performed an interim impairment test on March 31,
2009.
As a result of our interim impairment testing, for the nine-months ended September 30,
2009, we recorded a non-cash impairment loss of approximately $10.1 million that reduced the
carrying values of our FCC broadcasting licenses in our Chicago and San Francisco markets. The tax
impact of the impairment loss was an approximate $4.1 million tax benefit, which was related to the
reduction of the book/tax basis differences on our FCC broadcasting licenses.
The impairment loss was due to changes in estimates and assumptions which were primarily:
(a) lower industry advertising revenue growth projections in our respective markets, and (b) lower
industry profit margins.
We adopted the provision of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC) 350-30-50-2, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets
(ASC 350-30-50-2) as of January 1, 2009. ASC 350-30-50-2 amends the factors that should be
considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset. More specifically, ASC 350-30-50-2 removes the requirement to consider
whether an intangible asset can be renewed without substantial cost or material modifications to
the existing terms and conditions and instead, requires an entity to consider its own historical
experience in renewing similar arrangements. The adoption of ASC 350-30-50-2 did not have a
material impact to our financial statements.
Restructuring Costs
As a result of the continued deterioration of the economy and the decrease in the demand
for advertising, we began to implement a restructuring plan in the third quarter of fiscal year
2008 to reduce expenses throughout the Company. We have incurred restructuring costs totaling
$3.0 million to date, which include $0.6 million for the nine-months ended September 30, 2009,
related to the termination of various programming contracts and personnel. In addition, we will
continue to review further cost-cutting measures, as we continue to evaluate the scope and duration
of the current economic slowdown and its impact on our operations and financial position.
- 13 -
Table of Contents
9. Derivative Instruments
Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities
We only enter into derivative contracts to hedge against the potential impact of
increases in interest rates on our debt instruments. We also only enter into derivative contracts
that we intend to designate as a hedge of the variability of cash flows to be paid related to a
recognized asset or liability (cash flow hedge).
By using derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest
rates, we expose ourselves to credit risk and market risk. Credit risk is the failure of the
counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. We attempt to minimize the
credit risk in derivative instruments by entering into transactions with high-quality
counterparties whose credit rating is higher than Aa.
Market risk is the adverse effect on the value of a derivative instrument that results
from a change in interest rates. The market risk associated with interest-rate contracts is managed
by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that may
be undertaken.
For all hedging relationships, we formally document the hedging relationship and its
risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge, the hedging instrument, the
hedged item, the nature of the risk being hedged, how the hedging instruments effectiveness in
offsetting the hedged risk will be assessed prospectively and retrospectively, and a description of
the method of measuring ineffectiveness. We also formally assess, both at the hedges inception and
on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly
effective in offsetting cash flows of hedged items.
We are accounting for our interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges, which requires us to
recognize all derivative instruments on the balance sheet at fair value. The related gains or
losses on these instruments are deferred in stockholders deficit as a component of accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss). The deferred gains or losses on these transactions are
recognized in income in the period in which the related items being hedged are recognized in
expense. However, to the extent that the change in value of the derivative contracts does not
offset the change in the value of the underlying transaction being hedged, that ineffective portion
is immediately recognized into income. We recognize gains and losses immediately when the
underlying transaction settles. For cash flow hedges in which hedge accounting is discontinued
because it is determined that the derivative no longer qualifies as an effective cash flow hedge,
we continue to carry the derivative instrument at its fair value on the consolidated balance sheet
and recognize any subsequent changes in its fair value in earnings (change in fair value of
derivative instrument).
Derivatives and Hedging Activities
At September 30, 2009, derivative financial instruments are comprised of the
following (in thousands):
Fixed | Fair | |||||||||||||||
Notional | Interest | Expiration | Value | |||||||||||||
Agreement | Amount | Rate | Date | Liability | ||||||||||||
Interest rate swap |
$ | 310,375 | 5.98 | % | June 30, 2010 | $ | 8,205 | |||||||||
Interest rate swap |
6,834 | 6.31 | % | January 4, 2017 | 651 | |||||||||||
$ | 317,209 | $ | 8,856 | |||||||||||||
On June 29, 2005, we entered into a five-year interest rate swap agreement for the
original notional principal amount of $324.2 million whereby we pay a fixed interest rate of 5.98%,
as compared to interest at a floating rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 175 basis points. The
interest rate swap amortization schedule is identical to the First Lien Credit Facility
amortization schedule during June 30, 2005 to June 30, 2010, which has an effective date of June
29, 2005, quarterly notional reductions and an expiration date of June 30, 2010.
In September and October 2008, the counterparty to this interest rate swap, Lehman
Brothers Special Financing Inc., and its parent and credit support provider, Lehman Brothers
Holdings Inc., each filed for bankruptcy. Based on these bankruptcy filings and the information
obtained prior to these filings, this cash flow hedge no longer qualifies for hedge accounting.
Therefore, the change in fair value from September 15, 2008, the last time this hedge was
determined to be effective, to date, is recorded in earnings as a Change in fair value of
derivative instrument.
On September 15, 2008, the accumulated other comprehensive loss associated with this
hedge was $7.8 million and will be reclassified into earnings (interest expense) over the remaining
life of the hedge, which terminates on June 30, 2010. During the three- and nine-months ended
September 30, 2009, $1.4 million and $4.1 million, respectively, were reclassified and recorded as
interest expense. During the fiscal year December 31, 2009, we estimate that $5.4 million will be
reclassified and recorded as interest expense.
On January 4, 2007, we entered into a ten-year interest rate swap agreement for the
original notional principal amount of $7.7 million whereby we will pay a fixed interest rate of
6.31% as compared to interest at a floating rate equal to one-month LIBOR plus 125 basis points.
The interest rate swap amortization schedule is identical to the promissory note amortization
schedule, which has an effective date of January 4, 2007, monthly notional reductions and an
expiration date of January 4, 2017.
- 14 -
Table of Contents
Fair Value Disclosure of Derivative Instruments
The following table represents required quantitative disclosures regarding fair values of
our derivative instruments (in thousands).
Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | Significant | |||||||||||||||
September 30, 2009 | Active Markets | Other | Significant | |||||||||||||
Carrying Value and | for Identical | Observable | Unobservable | |||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Location | Instruments | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
Description | Derivative instruments | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Derivative designated as cash flow hedging instrument: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap |
$ | 651 | | 651 | | |||||||||||
Derivative no longer designated as cash flow hedging
instrument: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap |
$ | 8,205 | | 8,205 | | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 8,856 | | 8,856 | | |||||||||||
The interest rate swap fair value is derived from the present value of the
difference in cash flows based on the forward-looking LIBOR yield curve rates, as compared to our
fixed rate applied to the hedged amount through the term of the agreement, less adjustments for
credit risk.
Three-Months Ended | Nine-Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps | September 30, 2009 | September 30, 2008 | September 30, 2009 | September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||
(Loss) gain recognized in other comprehensive loss (effective portion) |
$ | (122 | ) | (3,200 | ) | $ | 237 | (4,460 | ) | |||||||
Loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into
interest expense |
1,421 | | 4,112 | | ||||||||||||
Gain recognized in change in fair value of derivative instrument |
958 | 3,585 | 3,448 | 3,585 |
10. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Cash and cash equivalents, receivables, as well as accounts payable, and other current
liabilities, as reflected in the consolidated financial statements, approximate fair value because
of the short-term maturity of these instruments. The estimated fair value of our other long-term
debt instruments, approximate their carrying amounts as the interest rates approximate our current
borrowing rate for similar debt instruments of comparable maturity, or have variable interest
rates.
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market
information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates are subjective in
nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be
determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
The estimated fair values of our financial instruments are as follows (in millions):
September 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Carrying | |||||||||||||||
Description | Amount | Fair Value | Amount | Fair Value | ||||||||||||
Senior credit facility term loan |
$ | 310.4 | 217.3 | 312.8 | 87.6 | |||||||||||
103/4% Series B cumulative exchangeable redeemable preferred stock |
92.3 | 46.2 | 92.3 | 23.1 | ||||||||||||
Promissory note payable, included in other long-term debt |
6.8 | 6.7 | 7.1 | 7.1 |
The fair value estimates of these financial instruments were based upon either:
(a) market quotes from a major financial institution taking into consideration the most recent
market activity, or (b) a discounted cash flow analysis taking into consideration current rates.
- 15 -
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
We own and/or operate 21 radio stations in markets that reach approximately 48% of the
U.S. Hispanic population. In addition, we own and operate two television stations and have various
affiliation, distribution and/or programming agreements, which allow us to reach approximately
5.3 million households throughout the U.S., including Puerto Rico.
The success of each of our stations depends significantly upon its audience ratings and
share of the overall advertising revenue within its market. The broadcasting industry is a highly
competitive business, but some barriers to entry do exist. Each of our stations competes with both
Spanish-language and English-language stations in its market, as well as with other advertising
media, such as newspapers, cable television, the Internet, magazines, outdoor advertising,
satellite radio and television, transit advertising and direct mail marketing. Factors which are
material to our competitive position include management experience, our stations rank in their
markets, signal strength and frequency, and audience demographics, including the nature of the
Spanish-language market targeted by a particular station.
Our primary source of revenue is the sale of advertising time on our stations to local
and national advertisers. Our revenue is affected primarily by the advertising rates that our
stations are able to charge, as well as the overall demand for advertising time in each respective
market. Seasonal net broadcasting revenue fluctuations are common in the broadcasting industry and
are primarily due to fluctuations in advertising demand from local and national advertisers.
Typically for the broadcasting industry, the first calendar quarter generally produces the lowest
revenue. Our most significant operating expenses are usually compensation expenses, programming
expenses, professional fees, and advertising and promotional expenses. Our senior management
strives to control these expenses, as well as other expenses, by working closely with local station
management and others, including vendors.
Our radio stations are located in six of the top-ten Hispanic markets of Los Angeles, New
York, Puerto Rico, Chicago, Miami and San Francisco. Los Angeles and New York have the largest and
second largest Hispanic populations, and are also the largest and second largest radio markets in
the United States in terms of advertising revenue, respectively. We format the programming of each
of our radio stations to capture a substantial share of the U.S. Hispanic audience in their
respective markets. The U.S. Hispanic population is diverse, consisting of numerous identifiable
groups from many different countries of origin and each with its own musical and cultural heritage.
The music, culture, customs and Spanish dialects vary from one radio market to another. We strive
to maintain familiarity with the musical tastes and preferences of each of the various Hispanic
ethnic groups and customize our programming to match the local preferences of our target
demographic audience in each market we serve. Our radio revenue is generated primarily from the
sale of local and national advertising.
Our television stations and related affiliates operate under the MegaTV brand. We have
created a unique television format which focuses on entertainment, events and variety with
high-quality production. Our programming is formatted to capture shares of the U.S. Hispanic
audience by focusing on our core strengths as an entertainment company, thus offering a new
alternative compared to the traditional Latino channels. MegaTVs programming is based on a
strategy designed to showcase a combination of programs, ranging from televised radio-branded shows
to general entertainment programs, such as music, celebrity, debate, interviews and personality
based shows. As part of our strategy, we have incorporated certain of our on-air personalities into
our programming, as well as including interactive elements to complement our Internet websites. We
develop and produce more than 70% of our programming and obtain other content from Spanish-language
production partners. Our television revenue is generated primarily from the sale of local
advertising and paid programming.
As part of our operating business, we also operate LaMusica.com, Mega.tv, and our radio
station websites which are bilingual (Spanish English) websites providing content related to
Latin music, entertainment, news and culture. LaMusica.com and our network of station websites
generate revenue primarily from advertising and sponsorship. In addition, the majority of our
station websites simultaneously stream our stations content, which has broadened the audience
reach of our radio stations. We also occasionally produce live concerts and events throughout the
United States, including Puerto Rico.
- 16 -
Table of Contents
Comparison Analysis of the Operating Results for the Three-Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
The following summary table presents financial data for each of our operating segments
(in thousands):
Three-Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, | Change | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | $ | % | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 34,558 | 36,411 | (1,853 | ) | (5 | %) | |||||||||
Television |
4,024 | 4,842 | (818 | ) | (17 | %) | ||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 38,582 | 41,253 | (2,671 | ) | (6 | %) | |||||||||
Engineering and programming expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 6,478 | 9,438 | (2,960 | ) | (31 | %) | |||||||||
Television |
3,113 | 4,554 | (1,441 | ) | (32 | %) | ||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 9,591 | 13,992 | (4,401 | ) | (31 | %) | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 10,902 | 13,579 | (2,677 | ) | (20 | %) | |||||||||
Television |
1,873 | 3,006 | (1,133 | ) | (38 | %) | ||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 12,775 | 16,585 | (3,810 | ) | (23 | %) | |||||||||
Corporate expenses: |
$ | 2,372 | 2,707 | (335 | ) | (12 | %) | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 781 | 817 | (36 | ) | (4 | %) | |||||||||
Television |
556 | 578 | (22 | ) | (4 | %) | ||||||||||
Corporate |
237 | 397 | (160 | ) | (40 | %) | ||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 1,574 | 1,792 | (218 | ) | (12 | %) | |||||||||
(Gain) loss on the disposal of assets, net: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | (6 | ) | (5 | ) | (1 | ) | 20 | % | |||||||
Television |
| | | 0 | % | |||||||||||
Corporate |
(8 | ) | | (8 | ) | 100 | % | |||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | (14 | ) | (5 | ) | (9 | ) | 180 | % | |||||||
Impairment of FCC broadcasting licenses and restructuring costs: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | | 2,191 | (2,191 | ) | (100 | %) | |||||||||
Television |
| 8 | (8 | ) | (100 | %) | ||||||||||
Corporate |
| | | 100 | % | |||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | | 2,199 | (2,199 | ) | (100 | %) | |||||||||
Operating (loss) income: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 16,403 | 10,391 | 6,012 | 58 | % | ||||||||||
Television |
(1,518 | ) | (3,304 | ) | 1,786 | (54 | %) | |||||||||
Corporate |
(2,601 | ) | (3,104 | ) | 503 | (16 | %) | |||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 12,284 | 3,983 | 8,301 | 208 | % | ||||||||||
The following summary table presents a comparison of our results of operations for the
three-months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. Various fluctuations illustrated in the table are
discussed below. This section should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements and notes.
Three-Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, | Change | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | $ | % | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenue |
$ | 38,582 | 41,253 | (2,671 | ) | (6 | %) | |||||||||
Engineering and programming expenses |
9,591 | 13,992 | (4,401 | ) | (31 | %) | ||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
12,775 | 16,585 | (3,810 | ) | (23 | %) | ||||||||||
Corporate expenses |
2,372 | 2,707 | (335 | ) | (12 | %) | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,574 | 1,792 | (218 | ) | (12 | %) | ||||||||||
Gain on disposal of assets, net |
(14 | ) | (5 | ) | (9 | ) | 180 | % | ||||||||
Impairment of FCC broadcasting licenses and restructuring costs |
| 2,199 | (2,199 | ) | (100 | %) | ||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 12,284 | 3,983 | 8,301 | 208 | % | ||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(6,723 | ) | (5,686 | ) | (1,037 | ) | 18 | % | ||||||||
Change in fair value of derivative instrument |
958 | 3,585 | (2,627 | ) | (73 | %) | ||||||||||
Other income, net |
| | | 100 | % | |||||||||||
Income tax expense |
1,976 | 2,325 | (349 | ) | (15 | %) | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 4,543 | $ | (443 | ) | 4,986 | (1126 | %) | ||||||||
- 17 -
Table of Contents
Net Revenue
The decrease in our consolidated net revenue of $2.7 million or 6% was mainly due to the
decrease in our radio segment net revenue. Our radio segment net revenue decreased $1.9 million or
5%, primarily due to lower local and barter sales caused mainly by the decline in economic
conditions. The decrease in local sales occurred in all of our markets, with the exception of our
San Francisco market. The decrease in barter sales occurred in all of our markets, with the
exception of our New York and Miami markets. Our television segment net revenue decreased
$0.8 million or 17%, primarily due to a decrease in barter sales and local spot sales.
Engineering and Programming Expenses
The decrease in our consolidated engineering and programming expenses of $4.4 million or
31% was due to the decreases in both our radio and television segment expenses. Our radio segment
expenses decreased $3.0 million or 31%, primarily related to decreases in compensation and benefits
for technical and programming personnel and audience research expenses due to headcount reductions.
Our television segment expenses decreased $1.4 million or 32%, primarily due to decreases in
original produced programming and compensation and benefits for our technical and programming
personnel due to headcount reductions.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
The decrease in our consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses of
$3.8 million or 23% was due to the decreases in both our radio and television segment expenses. Our
radio segment expenses decreased $2.7 million or 20%, primarily due to a decrease in advertising,
promotional and marketing costs, compensation and benefits for our selling, general and
administrative personnel due to headcount reductions, barter expenses and sales commissions. Our
television segment expenses decreased $1.1 million or 38%, primarily due to a decrease in
advertising, promotional and marketing costs, barter expenses and compensation
and benefits for our selling, general and administrative personnel due to headcount reductions.
Corporate Expenses
The decrease in corporate expenses was primarily a result of a decrease in professional
fees and travel and entertainment expenses.
Operating Income (Loss)
The increase in operating income was mainly due to the decrease in our operating
expenses. Also contributing to the increase in operating income was a decrease in the impairment
of FCC broadcasting licenses and restructuring costs, offset by a decrease in our net revenue.
Interest Expense, Net
In September and October 2008, the counterparty to one of our interest rate swaps, Lehman
Brothers Special Financing Inc., and its parent and credit support provider, Lehman Brothers
Holdings Inc., each filed for bankruptcy. Based on these bankruptcy filings and the information
obtained prior to the filings, this cash flow hedge no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. On
September 15, 2008, the Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss associated with this hedge was $7.8
million and this amount will be reclassified into earnings (interest expense) over the remaining
life of the hedge, which terminates on June 30, 2010. During the three-months ended September 30,
2009, $1.4 million was reclassified and recorded as interest expense primarily causing the increase
in interest expense, net. Also contributing to the increase in interest expense, net was a decrease
in interest income, resulting from a general decline in interest rates on our lower cash balances.
Change in Fair Value of Derivative Instrument
In September and October 2008, the counterparty to one of our interest rate swaps, Lehman
Brothers Special Financing Inc., and its parent and credit support provider, Lehman Brothers
Holdings Inc., each filed for bankruptcy. Based on these bankruptcy filings and the information
obtained prior to the filings, this cash flow hedge no longer qualified for hedge accounting.
Therefore, the change in fair value from June 30, 2009 to September 30, 2009 impacted our earnings,
which totaled $1.0 million for the three-months ended September 30, 2009.
Income Taxes
The income tax expense of $1.9 million arose primarily from the income tax expense
resulting from the tax amortization of our FCC broadcasting licenses.
Net Income (Loss)
The increase in net income was primarily due to the increase in operating income related
primarily to the decreases in operating expenses and in the impairment of FCC broadcasting licenses
and restructuring costs, partially offset by the decrease in the change in fair value of derivative
instrument and increase in interest expense.
- 18 -
Table of Contents
Comparison Analysis of the Operating Results for the Nine-Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
The following summary table presents financial data for each of our operating segments
(in thousands):
Nine-Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, | Change | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | $ | % | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
91,923 | 110,445 | (18,522 | ) | (17 | %) | ||||||||||
Television |
11,505 | 12,421 | (916 | ) | (7 | %) | ||||||||||
Consolidated |
103,428 | 122,866 | (19,438 | ) | (16 | %) | ||||||||||
Engineering and programming expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
20,973 | 29,590 | (8,617 | ) | (29 | %) | ||||||||||
Television |
10,857 | 14,520 | (3,663 | ) | (25 | %) | ||||||||||
Consolidated |
31,830 | 44,110 | (12,280 | ) | (28 | %) | ||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
30,357 | 45,449 | (15,092 | ) | (33 | %) | ||||||||||
Television |
6,243 | 8,348 | (2,105 | ) | (25 | %) | ||||||||||
Consolidated |
36,600 | 53,797 | (17,197 | ) | (32 | %) | ||||||||||
Corporate expenses: |
7,545 | 9,972 | (2,427 | ) | (24 | %) | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
2,374 | 2,397 | (23 | ) | (1 | %) | ||||||||||
Television |
1,646 | 1,022 | 624 | 61 | % | |||||||||||
Corporate |
717 | 1,177 | (460 | ) | (39 | %) | ||||||||||
Consolidated |
4,737 | 4,596 | 141 | 3 | % | |||||||||||
(Gain) loss on the disposal of assets, net: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
(26 | ) | (10 | ) | (16 | ) | 160 | % | ||||||||
Television |
19 | | 19 | 100 | % | |||||||||||
Corporate |
(22 | ) | | (22 | ) | 100 | % | |||||||||
Consolidated |
(29 | ) | (10 | ) | (19 | ) | 190 | % | ||||||||
Impairment of FCC broadcasting licenses
and restructuring costs: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
10,614 | 381,606 | (370,992 | ) | (97 | %) | ||||||||||
Television |
24 | 16,845 | (16,821 | ) | (100 | %) | ||||||||||
Corporate |
48 | | 48 | 100 | % | |||||||||||
Consolidated |
10,686 | 398,451 | (387,765 | ) | (97 | %) | ||||||||||
Operating (loss) income: |
||||||||||||||||
Radio |
27,631 | (348,587 | ) | 376,218 | (108 | %) | ||||||||||
Television |
(7,284 | ) | (28,314 | ) | 21,030 | (74 | %) | |||||||||
Corporate |
(8,288 | ) | (11,149 | ) | 2,861 | (26 | %) | |||||||||
Consolidated |
12,059 | (388,050 | ) | 400,109 | (103 | %) | ||||||||||
The following summary table presents a comparison of our results of operations for the
nine-months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. Various fluctuations illustrated in the table are
discussed below. This section should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements and notes.
Nine-Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, | Change | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | $ | % | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenue |
$ | 103,428 | 122,866 | (19,438 | ) | (16 | %) | |||||||||
Engineering and programming expenses |
31,830 | 44,110 | (12,280 | ) | (28 | %) | ||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
36,600 | 53,797 | (17,197 | ) | (32 | %) | ||||||||||
Corporate expenses |
7,545 | 9,972 | (2,427 | ) | (24 | %) | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,737 | 4,596 | 141 | 3 | % | |||||||||||
Gain on disposal of assets, net |
(29 | ) | (10 | ) | (19 | ) | 190 | % | ||||||||
Impairment of FCC broadcasting licenses and restructuring costs |
10,686 | 398,451 | (387,765 | ) | (97 | %) | ||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | 12,059 | (388,050 | ) | 400,109 | (103 | %) | |||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(19,841 | ) | (16,085 | ) | (3,756 | ) | 23 | % | ||||||||
Change in fair value of derivative instrument |
3,448 | 3,585 | (137 | ) | (4 | %) | ||||||||||
Other income, net |
1 | 1,928 | (1,927 | ) | (100 | %) | ||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
1,611 | (98,207 | ) | 99,818 | (102 | %) | ||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (5,944 | ) | $ | (300,415 | ) | 294,471 | (98 | %) | |||||||
- 19 -
Table of Contents
Net Revenue
The decrease in our consolidated net revenue of $19.4 million or 16% was mainly due to
the decrease in our radio segment net revenue. Our radio segment net revenue decreased
$18.5 million or 17%, primarily due to lower local, national, and barter sales caused mainly by the
decline in economic conditions. The decrease in local, national and barter sales occurred in all of
our markets. Our television segment net revenue decreased $0.9 million or 7%, primarily due to a
decrease in barter sales and local spot sales.
Engineering and Programming Expenses
The decrease in our consolidated engineering and programming expenses of $12.3 million or
28% was due to the decreases in both our radio and television segment expenses. Our radio segment
expenses decreased $8.6 million or 29%, primarily related to decreases in compensation and benefits
for technical and programming personnel and audience research expenses due to headcount reductions.
Our television segment expenses decreased $3.7 million or 25%, primarily due to decreases in
original produced programming and compensation and benefits for our technical and programming
personnel due to headcount reductions.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
The decrease in our consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses of
$17.2 million or 32% was primarily due to the decreases in both our radio and television segment
expenses. Our radio segment expenses decreased $15.1 million or 33%, primarily
due to a decrease in advertising, promotional and marketing costs, sales commissions, barter
expenses, the allowance for doubtful account provision, and compensation and benefits for our
selling, general and administrative personnel due to headcount reductions. Our television segment
expenses decreased $2.1 million or 25%, primarily due to a decrease in advertising, promotional and
marketing costs and barter expenses.
Corporate Expenses
The decrease in corporate expenses was primarily a result of a decrease in professional
fees, travel and entertainment expenses, and compensation and benefits for corporate personnel.
Impairment of FCC Broadcasting Licenses and Restructuring Costs
As a result of our impairment testing of our indefinite-lived intangible assets and
goodwill, we recorded a non-cash impairment loss of approximately $10.1 million that reduced the
carrying values of our FCC broadcasting licenses in our Chicago and San Francisco markets. The
impairment loss was due to changes in estimates and assumptions which were primarily: (a) lower
industry advertising revenue growth projections in our respective markets, and (b) lower industry
profit margins.
As a result of the continued deterioration of the economy and the decrease in the demand
for advertising, we began to implement a restructuring plan in the third quarter of fiscal year
2008 to reduce expenses throughout the Company. We have incurred restructuring costs totaling
$3.0 million to date, which include $0.6 million for the nine-months ended September 30, 2009,
related to the termination of various programming contracts and personnel. In addition, we will
continue to review further cost-cutting measures, as we continue to evaluate the scope and duration
of the current economic slowdown and its impact on our operations and financial position.
Operating Income
The increase in operating income was mainly due to the decrease in the impairment of FCC
broadcasting licenses and restructuring costs. Also contributing to the increase in operating
income was a decrease in our operating expenses, offset by a decrease in our net revenue.
Interest Expense, Net
In September and October 2008, the counterparty to one of our interest rate swaps, Lehman
Brothers Special Financing Inc., and its parent and credit support provider, Lehman Brothers
Holdings Inc., each filed for bankruptcy. Based on these bankruptcy filings and the information
obtained prior to the filings, this cash flow hedge no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. On
September 15, 2008, the Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss associated with this hedge was $7.8
million and this amount will be reclassified into earnings (interest expense) over the remaining
life of the hedge, which terminates on June 30, 2010. During the nine-months ended September 30,
2009, $4.1 million was reclassified and recorded as interest expense primarily causing the increase
in interest expense, net. Also contributing to the increase in interest expense, net was a decrease
in interest income, resulting from a general decline in interest rates on our lower cash balances.
Change in Fair Value of Derivative Instrument
In September and October 2008, the counterparty to one of our interest rate swaps, Lehman
Brothers Special Financing Inc., and its parent and credit support provider, Lehman Brothers
Holdings Inc., each filed for bankruptcy. Based on these bankruptcy filings and the information
obtained prior to the filings, this cash flow hedge no longer qualified for hedge accounting.
Therefore, the change in fair value from December 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009 impacted our
earnings, which totaled $3.4 million for the nine-months ended September 30, 2009.
- 20 -
Table of Contents
Income Taxes
The income tax expense of $1.6 million arose primarily from the tax amortization of our
FCC broadcasting licenses, offset by the impact of the reduction of our deferred tax liabilities
related to the impairment of our FCC broadcasting licenses of approximately $4.1 million.
Net Loss
The decrease in net loss was primarily due to the decrease in operating loss related
primarily to the decrease in impairment of FCC broadcasting licenses and restructuring costs and
the decrease in operating expenses, partially offset by the decreases in net revenue and income tax
benefit.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents ($45.8 million as of
September 30, 2009) and cash expected to be provided by operations. Our cash flow from operations
is subject to such factors as overall advertising demand, shifts in population, station
listenership and viewership, demographics, audience tastes and fluctuations in preferred
advertising media. Our ability to raise
funds by increasing our indebtedness is limited by the terms of the certificates of designation
governing our Series B preferred stock and the credit agreement governing our senior secured credit
facility. Additionally, our certificates of designation and credit agreement each place
restrictions on us with respect to the sale of assets, liens, investments, dividends, debt
repayments, capital expenditures, transactions with affiliates and consolidations and mergers,
among other things.
Our strategy is to primarily utilize cash flows from operations to meet our capital needs
and contractual obligations. Management continually projects anticipated cash requirements and
believes that cash from operating activities, together with cash on hand, should be sufficient to
permit us to meet our operating obligations in the foreseeable future, including, among other
things, required quarterly interest and principal payments pursuant to the credit agreement
governing our senior secured credit facility revolver due 2010 and senior secured credit facility
term loan due 2012, and capital expenditures, excluding the acquisitions of FCC licenses. While not
significant to us to date, the disruptions in the capital and credit markets may result in
increased borrowing costs associated with our short-term and long-term debt. Assumptions (none of
which can be assured) which underlie managements beliefs, include the following:
| the demand for advertising within the broadcasting industry and economic conditions in general will not continue to deteriorate further in any material respect; | |
| we will continue to successfully implement our business strategy; and | |
| we will not incur any material unforeseen liabilities, including but not limited to taxes, environmental liabilities, regulatory matters and legal judgments. |
As a result of the decrease in the demand for advertising and the continued deterioration
of the economy, we began to implement a restructuring plan in the third quarter of fiscal year 2008
to reduce expenses throughout the Company and have incurred costs totaling $3.0 million to date,
which includes $0.6 million for the nine-months ended September 30, 2009, related to the
termination of various programming contracts and personnel. In addition, we are reviewing other
cost-cutting measures, as we continue to evaluate the scope and duration of the current economic
slowdown and its continued impact on our operations.
We continuously evaluate opportunities to make strategic acquisitions and/or
dispositions, primarily in the largest Hispanic markets in the United States. We engage in
discussions regarding potential acquisitions and/or dispositions from time to time in the ordinary
course of business. We anticipate that any future acquisitions would be financed through funds
generated from permitted debt financing, equity financing, operations, asset sales or a combination
of these or other available sources. However, there can be no assurance that financing from any of
these sources, if necessary and available, can be obtained on favorable terms for future
acquisitions.
- 21 -
Table of Contents
The following summary table presents a comparison of our capital resources for the
nine-months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, with respect to certain of our key measures
affecting our liquidity. The changes set forth in the table are discussed below. This section
should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and
notes.
Nine-Months Ended | ||||||||||||
September 30, | Change | |||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | $ | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures: |
||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 428 | 2,643 | (2,215 | ) | |||||||
Television |
338 | 12,525 | (12,187 | ) | ||||||||
Corporate |
49 | 423 | (374 | ) | ||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 815 | 15,591 | (14,776 | ) | |||||||
Net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities |
$ | 21,234 | (1,607 | ) | 22,841 | |||||||
Net cash flows used in investing activities |
(589 | ) | (15,500 | ) | 14,911 | |||||||
Net cash flows used in financing activities |
(7,729 | ) | (10,010 | ) | 2,281 | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 12,916 | (27,117 | ) | ||||||||
Capital Expenditures
The decrease in our capital expenditures is a result of the completion of various capital
projects, including the build-out and furnishing of the SBS Miami Broadcast Center that was
completed in 2008. For the fiscal year 2009, we are projecting capital expenditures to be in the
range of $1.0 to $1.5 million, which is a significant decrease from the prior year.
Net Cash Flows Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities
Changes in our net cash flows from operating activities were primarily a result of the
decrease in cash paid to vendors, including interest.
Net Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities
Changes in our net cash flows from investing activities were a result of the decrease in
our capital expenditures due to the completion of various capital projects in 2008, primarily the
build-out and furnishing of the SBS Miami Broadcast Center.
Net Cash Flows Used in Financing Activities
Changes in our net cash flows from financing activities were a result of our
determination that, based on, among other things, the current economic environment and future cash
requirements, it would not be prudent to declare or pay cash dividends on our Series B preferred
stock which were due on July 15, 2009.
Recent Developments
NASDAQ Notification Letters
NASDAQ Delisting Letter and Temporary Postponement
On August 20, 2008, we received a Staff Deficiency Letter (the Staff Deficiency Letter)
from The Nasdaq Stock Market (NASDAQ) indicating that the minimum bid price of our common stock had
fallen below $1.00 for 30 consecutive trading days, and therefore not in compliance with NASDAQ
Marketplace Rule 4450(b). The Staff Deficiency Letter further provided that in accordance with the
NASDAQ Marketplace Rules, we would be provided 180 calendar days, or until February 17, 2009, to
regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement.
On October 22, 2008, we received a notification letter (the Notification Letter) from NASDAQ,
notifying us that NASDAQ had suspended the enforcement of the rule requiring a minimum bid price
and market value of publicly held shares (the Rule) for a three-month period, effective October 16,
2008. NASDAQ indicated that they would not take any action to delist any security for these
concerns during the suspension period. The Notification Letter stated that, given the current
extraordinary market conditions, the suspension would remain in effect through January 16, 2009.
Subsequently, NASDAQ extended the suspension through July 31, 2009. Upon reinstatement of the
Rule, we have 124 calendar days remaining in our compliance period, or until on or about
December 4, 2009, to regain compliance. We may regain compliance, either during the suspension or
during the compliance period resuming after the suspension, by achieving a $1.00 closing bid price
for a minimum of 10 consecutive trading days.
We intend to use all reasonable efforts to maintain the listing of our common stock on
the NASDAQ Global Market, but there can be no guarantee that we will regain compliance with the
continued listing requirements, or will be able to demonstrate a plan to sustain compliance in
order to avoid delisting from the NASDAQ Global Market.
- 22 -
Table of Contents
NASDAQ Audit Committee Compliance Letter
On August 14, 2009, we notified NASDAQ that due to the vacancy in our Audit Committee created
by Antonio Fernandez voluntary resignation as a member of the Board, we were no longer in
compliance with NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 5605 (Rule 5605), which requires that the Audit Committee
be comprised of at least three members, each of whom are independent.
As a result, on August 27, 2009, we received a letter from NASDAQ notifying us that we were
not in compliance with the audit committee requirements as set forth in Rule 5605 and advising us
that, consistent with NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 5605(c)(4)(A), NASDAQ will provide us the following
cure period to regain compliance:
| until the earlier of our next annual shareholders meeting or August 11, 2010; or | |
| if the next annual shareholders meeting is held before February 8, 2010, no later than February 8, 2010. |
Since we intend to hold our next annual shareholders meeting after February 8, 2010 and before
August 11, 2010, we will have until our next annual shareholders meeting to regain compliance. An
active search for Mr. Fernandez replacement is currently underway and we fully intend to regain
compliance with Rule 5605 within the cure period allowed by NASDAQ.
Dividend Payment on the Series B Preferred Stock
Under the terms of our Series B preferred stock, the holders of the outstanding shares of
the Series B preferred stock are entitled to receive, when, as and if declared by the Board of
Directors, dividends on the Series B preferred stock at a rate of 10 3/4 % per year, of the $1,000
liquidation preference per share, payable quarterly in arrears. On November 10, 2009, August 11,
2009 and May 12, 2009, our Board of Directors, under managements recommendation, determined that
based on, among other things, the current economic environment and future cash requirements, it
would not be prudent to declare or pay the January 15, 2010, October 15, 2009 and July 15, 2009
cash dividends in the aggregate amount of approximately $7.5 million. Under the Series B preferred
stock certificate of designations, failure to make four consecutive quarterly cash dividend
payments will result in the right of the holders of the Series B preferred stock to elect two
directors to the board.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to
have, a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial
condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital
resources.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In the quarter ended September 30, 2009, we adopted the FASB ASC Topic 105 Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (ASC 105). ASC 105 does not amend GAAP, but codifies previous accounting
literature and revises the GAAP hierarchy to include only two levels of GAAP: authoritative and
nonauthoritative. All of the content included in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification will be
considered authoritative.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS No. 166) which has not yet been codified in the ASC.
This statement removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity (QSPE) and eliminates the
exception from applying FASB ASC 810-10 Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, to qualifying
special-purpose entities. Furthermore, SFAS No. 166 establishes specific conditions to account for
a transfer of financial assets as a sale, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial
assets and requires additional disclosure. SFAS No. 166 will be effective as of the beginning of
the first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, which for us will be our
fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2010. We do not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 166
will have a significant impact on the Company.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)
(SFAS No. 167) which has not yet been codified in the ASC. This guidance is a revision to
pre-existing guidance that requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to identify the primary
beneficiary of a Variable Interest Entity (VIE), a qualitatively on-going re-assessment on whether
the enterprise is the primary beneficiary of the VIE and additional disclosures that will provide
users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprises involvement
in a VIE. In addition, this statement revises the methods utilized for determining whether an
entity is a VIE and the events that trigger a reassessment of whether an entity is a VIE. SFAS No.
167 will be effective as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period that begins after
November 15, 2009, which for us will be our fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2010. We do not
anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 167 will have a significant impact on the Company.
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation Of Disclosure Controls And Procedures. Our principal executive and financial
officers have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange
Act, to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit under
the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
in the SECs rules and forms, and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that
information we are required to disclose in such reports is accumulated and communicated to
management, including our principal executive and financial officers, as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive
and financial officers concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
the end of the period covered by this report.
- 23 -
Table of Contents
Changes In Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There has been no change in our
internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009 that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The information set forth under Note 7 contained in the Notes to Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is incorporated by
reference in answer to this Item.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you
should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which could materially affect our
business, financial condition or future results. There have been no material changes from the risk
factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, but they
are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or
that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition and/or operating results.
- 24 -
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
The following exhibits, which are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K,
are filed herewith or, as noted, incorporated by reference herein:
Exhibit | ||||||
Number | Exhibit Description | |||||
3.1 | | Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (the
Company), dated September 29, 1999 (incorporated by reference to the Companys 1999
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Commission File No. 333-85499) (the 1999 Registration
Statement)) (Exhibit A to this exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K, dated March 25, 1996 (the 1996 Current Report). |
||||
3.2 | | Certificate of Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Company, dated September 29, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Companys 1999
Registration Statement). |
||||
3.3 | | Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the
Companys 1999 Registration Statement). |
||||
3.4 | | Certificate of Elimination of 141/4% Senior Exchangeable Preferred Stock, Series A of the
Company, dated October 28, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, dated November 14, 2003 (the 11/14/03 Quarterly Report)). |
||||
4.1 | | Article V of the Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated
September 29, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys 1999 Registration
Statement). |
||||
4.2 | | Certificate of Designations dated October 29, 2003 Setting Forth the Voting Power, Preferences
and Relative, Participating, Optional and Other Special Rights and Qualifications, Limitations
and Restrictions of the 103/4% Series A Cumulative Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock of
Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys
11/14/03 Quarterly Report). |
||||
4.3 | | Certificate of Designations dated October 29, 2003 Setting Forth the Voting Power, Preferences
and Relative, Participating, Optional and Other Special Rights and Qualifications, Limitations
and Restrictions of the 103/4% Series B Cumulative Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock of
Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Companys
11/14/03 Quarterly Report). |
||||
4.4 | | Indenture dated June 29, 1994 among the Company, IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as Trustee,
the Guarantors named therein and the Purchasers named therein (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys 1994 Registration Statement on Form S-4 (the 1994 Registration
Statement). |
||||
4.5 | | First Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 25, 1996 to the Indenture dated as of June 29,
1994 among the Company, the Guarantors named therein and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as
Trustee (incorporated by reference to the 1996 Current Report). |
||||
4.6 | | Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 1, 1997 to the Indenture dated as of June 29,
1994 among the Company, the Guarantors named therein and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as
Trustee (incorporated by reference to the 1996 Current Report). |
||||
4.7 | | Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 21, 1999 to the Indenture dated as of June 29, 1994
among the Company, the Guarantors named therein and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as Trustee
(incorporated by reference to the Companys 1999 Registration Statement). |
||||
4.8 | | Indenture with respect to 95/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 with The Bank of New York as
Trustee, dated November 8, 1999 (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K
dated November 2, 1999 (the 1999 Current Report)). |
- 25 -
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||||||
Number | Exhibit Description | |||||
4.9 | | Indenture with respect to 95/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 with the Bank of New York as
Trustee, dated June 8, 2001 (incorporated by reference to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-3, filed on June 25, 2001 (the 2001 Form S-3). |
||||
4.10 | | Form of stock certificate for the Class A common stock of the Company (incorporated by reference
to the Companys 1999 Registration Statement). |
||||
4.11 | | Certificate of Elimination of 141/4% of Senior Exchangeable Preferred Stock, Series A of the
Company, dated October 28, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 14, 2003). |
||||
4.12 | | Certificate of Designation Setting Forth the Voting Power, Preferences and Relative,
Participating, Optional and Other Special Rights and Qualifications, Limitations and Restrictions
of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company (Certificate of Designation of Series
C Preferred Stock) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on December 27, 2004). |
||||
4.13 | | Certificate of Correction to Certificate of Designation of Series C Preferred Stock of the
Company dated January 7, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 of the Companys Annual
Report filed on Form 10-K for the fiscal year 2004). |
||||
31.1 | | Chief Executive Officers Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||||
31.2 | | Chief Financial Officers Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||||
32.1 | | Chief Executive Officers Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||||
32.2 | | Chief Financial Officers Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
- 26 -
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. |
||||
By: | /s/ JOSEPH A. GARCÍA | |||
JOSEPH A. GARCÍA | ||||
Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer, Senior Executive Vice President and Secretary (principal financial and accounting officer and duly authorized officer of the registrant) |
Date: November 12, 2009
- 27 -
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||||||
Number | Exhibit Description | |||||
3.1 | | Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (the
Company), dated September 29, 1999 (incorporated by reference to the Companys 1999
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Commission File No. 333-85499) (the 1999 Registration
Statement)) (Exhibit A to this exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K, dated March 25, 1996 (the 1996 Current Report). |
||||
3.2 | | Certificate of Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Company, dated September 29, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Companys 1999
Registration Statement). |
||||
3.3 | | Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the
Companys 1999 Registration Statement). |
||||
3.4 | | Certificate of Elimination of 141/4% Senior Exchangeable Preferred Stock, Series A of the
Company, dated October 28, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, dated November 14, 2003 (the 11/14/03 Quarterly Report)). |
||||
4.1 | | Article V of the Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated
September 29, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys 1999 Registration
Statement). |
||||
4.2 | | Certificate of Designations dated October 29, 2003 Setting Forth the Voting Power, Preferences
and Relative, Participating, Optional and Other Special Rights and Qualifications, Limitations
and Restrictions of the 103/4% Series A Cumulative Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock of
Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys
11/14/03 Quarterly Report). |
||||
4.3 | | Certificate of Designations dated October 29, 2003 Setting Forth the Voting Power, Preferences
and Relative, Participating, Optional and Other Special Rights and Qualifications, Limitations
and Restrictions of the 103/4% Series B Cumulative Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock of
Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Companys
11/14/03 Quarterly Report). |
||||
4.4 | | Indenture dated June 29, 1994 among the Company, IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as Trustee,
the Guarantors named therein and the Purchasers named therein (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys 1994 Registration Statement on Form S-4 (the 1994 Registration
Statement). |
||||
4.5 | | First Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 25, 1996 to the Indenture dated as of June 29,
1994 among the Company, the Guarantors named therein and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as
Trustee (incorporated by reference to the 1996 Current Report). |
||||
4.6 | | Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 1, 1997 to the Indenture dated as of June 29,
1994 among the Company, the Guarantors named therein and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as
Trustee (incorporated by reference to the 1996 Current Report). |
||||
4.7 | | Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 21, 1999 to the Indenture dated as of June 29, 1994
among the Company, the Guarantors named therein and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as Trustee
(incorporated by reference to the Companys 1999 Registration Statement). |
||||
4.8 | | Indenture with respect to 95/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 with The Bank of New York as
Trustee, dated November 8, 1999 (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K
dated November 2, 1999 (the 1999 Current Report)). |
||||
4.9 | | Indenture with respect to 95/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 with the Bank of New York as
Trustee, dated June 8, 2001 (incorporated by reference to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-3, filed on June 25, 2001 (the 2001 Form S-3). |
- 28 -
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||||||
Number | Exhibit Description | |||||
4.10 | | Form of stock certificate for the Class A common stock of the Company (incorporated by reference
to the Companys 1999 Registration Statement). |
||||
4.11 | | Certificate of Elimination of 141/4% of Senior Exchangeable Preferred Stock, Series A of the
Company, dated October 28, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 14, 2003). |
||||
4.12 | | Certificate of Designation Setting Forth the Voting Power, Preferences and Relative,
Participating, Optional and Other Special Rights and Qualifications, Limitations and Restrictions
of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company (Certificate of Designation of Series
C Preferred Stock) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on December 27, 2004). |
||||
4.13 | | Certificate of Correction to Certificate of Designation of Series C Preferred Stock of the
Company dated January 7, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 of the Companys Annual
Report filed on Form 10-K for the fiscal year 2004). |
||||
31.1 | | Chief Executive Officers Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||||
31.2 | | Chief Financial Officers Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||||
32.1 | | Chief Executive Officers Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||||
32.2 | | Chief Financial Officers Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
- 29 -