SPIRE INC - Quarter Report: 2007 December (Form 10-Q)
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D. C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
[
X ]
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934 For the Quarter Ended
December 31, 2007
|
OR
[
]
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
Commission
File Number
|
Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter and Principal Office
Address and Telephone Number
|
State
of Incorporation
|
I.R.S.
Employer
Identification Number
|
1-16681
|
The
Laclede Group, Inc.
720
Olive Street
St.
Louis, MO 63101
314-342-0500
|
Missouri
|
74-2976504
|
1-1822
|
Laclede
Gas Company
720
Olive Street
St.
Louis, MO 63101
314-342-0500
|
Missouri
|
43-0368139
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such report) and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days.
Yes
|
[
X ]
|
No
|
[
]
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the
Exchange Act):
The
Laclede Group, Inc.:
|
Large
accelerated filer
|
[
]
|
Accelerated
filer
|
[
X ]
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
[
]
|
Laclede
Gas Company:
|
Large
accelerated filer
|
[
]
|
Accelerated
filer
|
[
]
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
[
X ]
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act):
The
Laclede Group,
Inc.:
|
Yes
|
[
]
|
No
|
[
X ]
|
Laclede
Gas
Company:
|
Yes
|
[
]
|
No
|
[
X ]
|
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock
as of the latest practicable date:
Shares
Outstanding At
|
||
Registrant
|
Description
of Common
Stock
|
January
31,
2008
|
The
Laclede Group,
Inc.:
|
Common
Stock ($1.00 Par Value)
|
21,788,966
|
Laclede
Gas
Company:
|
Common
Stock ($1.00 Par Value)
|
10,337 *
|
*
100% owned by The Laclede Group, Inc.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
Page
No.
|
||||
PART
1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|||||
Item
1
|
Financial
Statements
|
||||
The
Laclede Group, Inc.:
|
|||||
Statements
of Consolidated Income
|
4
|
||||
Statements
of Consolidated Comprehensive Income
|
5
|
||||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
6-7
|
||||
Statements
of Consolidated Cash Flows
|
8
|
||||
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
9-18
|
||||
Laclede
Gas Company:
|
|||||
Statements
of Income
|
Ex.
99.1, p. 1
|
||||
Statements
of Comprehensive Income
|
Ex.
99.1, p. 2
|
||||
Balance
Sheets
|
Ex.
99.1, p. 3-4
|
||||
Statements
of Cash Flows
|
Ex.
99.1, p. 5
|
||||
Notes
to Financial Statements
|
Ex.
99.1, p. 6-11
|
||||
Item
2
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
|
||||
Results
of Operations (The Laclede Group, Inc.)
|
19-28
|
||||
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
|
|||||
Results
of Operations (Laclede Gas Company)
|
Ex.
99.1, p. 12-19
|
||||
Item
3
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
29
|
|||
Item
4
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
29
|
|||
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|||||
Item
1
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
30
|
|||
Item
2
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
30
|
|||
Item
6
|
Exhibits
|
30
|
|||
SIGNATURES
– The Laclede Group, Inc.
|
31
|
||||
SIGNATURES
– Laclede Gas Company
|
32
|
||||
INDEX
TO EXHIBITS
|
FILING FORMAT |
This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is a combined
report being
filed by two separate registrants: The
Laclede Group,
Inc. (Laclede Group or the Company) and Laclede Gas Company (Laclede Gas
or the Utility).
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
The
interim financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company,
without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. These financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007.
3
Item
1. Financial Statements
THE
LACLEDE GROUP, INC.
|
STATEMENTS
OF
CONSOLIDATED INCOME
|
(UNAUDITED)
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|||||||
December
31,
|
|||||||
(Thousands,
Except Per Share Amounts)
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||
Operating
Revenues:
|
|||||||
Regulated
|
|||||||
Gas
distribution
|
$
|
320,892
|
$
|
348,488
|
|||
Non-Regulated
|
|||||||
Services
|
37,362
|
36,429
|
|||||
Gas
marketing
|
181,798
|
153,467
|
|||||
Other
|
1,299
|
1,177
|
|||||
Total
Operating Revenues
|
541,351
|
539,561
|
|||||
Operating
Expenses:
|
|||||||
Regulated
|
|||||||
Natural
and propane gas
|
222,841
|
251,523
|
|||||
Other
operation expenses
|
35,213
|
33,680
|
|||||
Maintenance
|
6,235
|
5,598
|
|||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
8,713
|
8,497
|
|||||
Taxes,
other than income taxes
|
16,681
|
18,759
|
|||||
Total
Regulated Operating Expenses
|
289,683
|
318,057
|
|||||
Non-Regulated
|
|||||||
Services
|
37,699
|
36,361
|
|||||
Gas
marketing
|
172,872
|
147,668
|
|||||
Other
|
1,051
|
1,077
|
|||||
Total
Operating Expenses
|
501,305
|
503,163
|
|||||
Operating
Income
|
40,046
|
36,398
|
|||||
Other
Income and (Income Deductions) – Net
|
2,650
|
3,303
|
|||||
Interest
Charges:
|
|||||||
Interest
on long-term debt
|
5,126
|
5,626
|
|||||
Interest
on long-term debt to unconsolidated affiliate trust
|
893
|
893
|
|||||
Other
interest charges
|
4,163
|
3,434
|
|||||
Total
Interest Charges
|
10,182
|
9,953
|
|||||
Income
Before Income Taxes and Dividends on
|
|||||||
Redeemable
Preferred Stock – Laclede Gas
|
32,514
|
29,748
|
|||||
Income
Tax Expense
|
11,601
|
10,649
|
|||||
Dividends
on Redeemable Preferred Stock – Laclede Gas
|
10
|
12
|
|||||
Net
Income
|
$
|
20,903
|
$
|
19,087
|
|||
Average
Number of Common Shares Outstanding
|
21,554
|
21,381
|
|||||
Basic
Earnings Per Share of Common Stock
|
$
|
0.97
|
$
|
0.89
|
|||
Diluted
Earnings Per Share of Common Stock
|
$
|
0.97
|
$
|
0.89
|
|||
Dividends
Declared Per Share of Common Stock
|
$
|
0.375
|
$
|
0.365
|
|||
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
THE
LACLEDE GROUP, INC.
|
|||||||
STATEMENTS
OF CONSOLIDATED COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|||||||
(UNAUDITED)
|
|||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
|||||||
December
31,
|
|||||||
(Thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||
Net
Income
|
$
|
20,903
|
$
|
19,087
|
|||
Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax:
|
|||||||
Net
gains (losses) on cash flow hedging derivative
instruments:
|
|||||||
Net
hedging gain arising during the period
|
144
|
1,035
|
|||||
Reclassification
adjustment for gains included in net income
|
(2,734
|
)
|
(580
|
)
|
|||
Net
unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedging derivative
instruments
|
(2,590
|
)
|
455
|
||||
Amortization
of actuarial loss included in net periodic pension cost
|
43
|
—
|
|||||
Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax
|
(2,547
|
)
|
455
|
||||
Income
Tax Expense (Benefit) Related to Items of Other Comprehensive
Income
|
(984
|
)
|
176
|
||||
Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax
|
(1,563
|
)
|
279
|
||||
Comprehensive
Income
|
$
|
19,340
|
$
|
19,366
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
THE
LACLEDE GROUP, INC.
|
||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
||||||||||||||
(UNAUDITED)
|
||||||||||||||
Dec.
31,
|
Sept.
30,
|
Dec.
31,
|
||||||||||||
(Thousands)
|
2007
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||||||||
Utility
Plant
|
$
|
1,195,431
|
$
|
1,187,828
|
$
|
1,158,480
|
||||||||
Less: Accumulated
depreciation and amortization
|
395,447
|
394,034
|
389,433
|
|||||||||||
Net
Utility Plant
|
799,984
|
793,794
|
769,047
|
|||||||||||
Goodwill
|
33,595
|
33,595
|
33,595
|
|||||||||||
Non-utility
property
|
10,654
|
11,270
|
12,276
|
|||||||||||
Other
investments
|
47,103
|
45,436
|
44,358
|
|||||||||||
Other
Property and Investments
|
57,757
|
56,706
|
56,634
|
|||||||||||
Current
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
66,930
|
52,746
|
51,918
|
|||||||||||
Accounts
receivable:
|
||||||||||||||
Gas
customers – billed and unbilled
|
199,067
|
102,224
|
176,181
|
|||||||||||
Other
|
110,173
|
86,713
|
126,579
|
|||||||||||
Allowances
for doubtful accounts
|
(8,680
|
)
|
(11,268
|
)
|
(9,401
|
)
|
||||||||
Inventories:
|
||||||||||||||
Natural
gas stored underground at LIFO cost
|
132,059
|
138,256
|
135,275
|
|||||||||||
Propane
gas at FIFO cost
|
19,913
|
19,950
|
20,325
|
|||||||||||
Materials,
supplies, and merchandise at average cost
|
5,041
|
4,990
|
6,028
|
|||||||||||
Derivative
instrument assets
|
15,953
|
31,057
|
15,976
|
|||||||||||
Unamortized
purchased gas adjustments
|
8,613
|
12,813
|
34,538
|
|||||||||||
Prepayments
and other
|
13,344
|
29,854
|
16,815
|
|||||||||||
Total
Current Assets
|
562,413
|
467,335
|
574,234
|
|||||||||||
Deferred
Charges:
|
||||||||||||||
Prepaid
pension cost
|
—
|
—
|
62,472
|
|||||||||||
Regulatory
assets
|
288,868
|
285,054
|
178,334
|
|||||||||||
Other
|
5,068
|
4,669
|
6,835
|
|||||||||||
Total
Deferred Charges
|
293,936
|
289,723
|
247,641
|
|||||||||||
Total
Assets
|
$
|
1,747,685
|
$
|
1,641,153
|
$
|
1,681,151
|
||||||||
6
THE
LACLEDE GROUP, INC.
|
||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS (Continued)
|
||||||||||||||
(UNAUDITED)
|
||||||||||||||
Dec.
31,
|
Sept.
30,
|
Dec.
31,
|
||||||||||||
(Thousands,
except share amounts)
|
2007
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||
CAPITALIZATION
AND LIABILITIES
|
||||||||||||||
Capitalization:
|
||||||||||||||
Common
stock (70,000,000 shares authorized, 21,761,629,
21,645,637,
and 21,542,117 shares issued, respectively)
|
$
|
21,762
|
$
|
21,646
|
$
|
21,542
|
||||||||
Paid-in
capital
|
137,903
|
136,061
|
131,308
|
|||||||||||
Retained
earnings
|
280,438
|
268,761
|
261,747
|
|||||||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
294
|
1,857
|
3,934
|
|||||||||||
Total
Common Stock Equity
|
440,397
|
428,325
|
418,531
|
|||||||||||
Redeemable
preferred stock (less current sinking fund
requirements)
– Laclede Gas
|
627
|
627
|
787
|
|||||||||||
Long-term
debt to unconsolidated affiliate trust
|
46,400
|
46,400
|
46,400
|
|||||||||||
Long-term
debt (less current portion) – Laclede Gas
|
309,138
|
309,122
|
309,062
|
|||||||||||
Total
Capitalization
|
796,562
|
784,474
|
774,780
|
|||||||||||
Current
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||
Notes
payable
|
294,450
|
211,400
|
257,150
|
|||||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
145,581
|
106,829
|
149,969
|
|||||||||||
Advance
customer billings
|
27,382
|
25,440
|
19,583
|
|||||||||||
Current
portion of long-term debt and preferred stock
|
160
|
40,160
|
40,159
|
|||||||||||
Wages
and compensation accrued
|
17,789
|
15,482
|
16,883
|
|||||||||||
Dividends
payable
|
8,247
|
7,970
|
7,923
|
|||||||||||
Customer
deposits
|
15,128
|
15,899
|
16,600
|
|||||||||||
Interest
accrued
|
6,371
|
11,103
|
6,270
|
|||||||||||
Taxes
accrued
|
17,994
|
20,183
|
27,100
|
|||||||||||
Deferred
income taxes current
|
1,525
|
2,644
|
4,413
|
|||||||||||
Other
|
17,585
|
16,555
|
16,289
|
|||||||||||
Total
Current Liabilities
|
552,212
|
473,665
|
562,339
|
|||||||||||
Deferred
Credits and Other Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
232,417
|
225,068
|
234,670
|
|||||||||||
Unamortized
investment tax credits
|
4,143
|
4,200
|
4,377
|
|||||||||||
Pension
and postretirement benefit costs
|
67,648
|
63,678
|
20,385
|
|||||||||||
Asset
retirement obligations
|
26,517
|
26,125
|
26,409
|
|||||||||||
Regulatory
liabilities
|
39,687
|
39,589
|
34,137
|
|||||||||||
Other
|
28,499
|
24,354
|
24,054
|
|||||||||||
Total
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities
|
398,911
|
383,014
|
344,032
|
|||||||||||
Total
Capitalization and Liabilities
|
$
|
1,747,685
|
$
|
1,641,153
|
$
|
1,681,151
|
||||||||
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
THE
LACLEDE GROUP, INC.
|
|||||||||
STATEMENTS
OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
|
|||||||||
(UNAUDITED)
|
|||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
|||||||||
December
31,
|
|||||||||
(Thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
Operating
Activities:
|
|||||||||
Net
Income
|
$
|
20,903
|
$
|
19,087
|
|||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in)
operating
activities:
|
|||||||||
Depreciation,
amortization, and accretion
|
9,672
|
9,606
|
|||||||
Deferred
income taxes and investment tax credits
|
1,884
|
(6,560
|
)
|
||||||
Other
– net
|
630
|
627
|
|||||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||||
Accounts
receivable – net
|
(122,891
|
)
|
(130,217
|
)
|
|||||
Unamortized
purchased gas adjustments
|
4,200
|
9,843
|
|||||||
Deferred
purchased gas costs
|
1,943
|
14,796
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
38,752
|
46,695
|
|||||||
Advance
customer billings
|
1,942
|
(11,860
|
)
|
||||||
Taxes
accrued
|
(2,189
|
)
|
12,074
|
||||||
Natural
gas stored underground
|
6,197
|
2,201
|
|||||||
Other
assets and liabilities
|
31,238
|
2,017
|
|||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(7,719
|
)
|
(31,691
|
)
|
|||||
Investing
Activities:
|
|||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
(13,369
|
)
|
(11,920
|
)
|
|||||
Other
investments
|
(1,194
|
)
|
(1,174
|
)
|
|||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(14,563
|
)
|
(13,094
|
)
|
|||||
Financing
Activities:
|
|||||||||
Maturity
of first mortgage bonds
|
(40,000
|
)
|
—
|
||||||
Issuance
of short-term debt – net
|
83,050
|
49,850
|
|||||||
Issuance
of common stock
|
1,305
|
3,599
|
|||||||
Dividends
paid
|
(7,897
|
)
|
(7,580
|
)
|
|||||
Other
|
8
|
56
|
|||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
36,466
|
45,925
|
|||||||
Net
Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
14,184
|
1,140
|
|||||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
|
52,746
|
50,778
|
|||||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
|
$
|
66,930
|
$
|
51,918
|
|||||
Supplemental
Disclosure of Cash Paid During the Period for:
|
|||||||||
Interest
|
$
|
15,226
|
$
|
14,204
|
|||||
Income
taxes
|
5,931
|
24
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
8
THE
LACLEDE GROUP, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
These
notes are an integral part of the accompanying consolidated financial statements
of The Laclede Group, Inc. (Laclede Group or the Company) and its subsidiaries.
In the opinion of Laclede Group, this interim report includes all adjustments
(consisting of only normal recurring accruals) necessary for the fair
presentation of the results of operations for the periods presented. This Form
10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements contained in the Company’s Fiscal Year 2007 Form
10-K.
The
consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of
Laclede Group are comprised primarily from the financial position, results
of
operations, and cash flows of Laclede Gas Company
(Laclede Gas or the Utility). Laclede Gas is a regulated natural gas
distribution utility having a material seasonal cycle. As a result, these
interim statements of income for Laclede Group are not necessarily indicative
of
annual results or representative of succeeding quarters of the fiscal year.
Due
to the seasonal nature of the business of Laclede Gas, earnings are typically
concentrated in the November through April period, which generally corresponds
with the heating season. SM&P Utility Resources, Inc. (SM&P) is a
non-regulated underground facility locating and marking service business.
SM&P’s results can be influenced by seasonality and trends in the
construction sector.
REVENUE
RECOGNITION - Laclede
Gas reads meters and bills its customers on monthly cycles. The Utility records
its regulated gas distribution revenues from gas sales and transportation
services on an accrual basis that includes estimated amounts for gas delivered,
but not yet billed. The accruals for unbilled revenues are reversed in the
subsequent accounting period when meters are actually read and customers are
billed. The amounts of accrued unbilled revenues at December 31, 2007
and 2006, for the Utility, were $50.7 million and $41.4 million, respectively.
The amount of accrued unbilled revenue at September 30, 2007 was $11.9
million.
INCOME
TAXES - Laclede Group
and its subsidiaries have elected, for tax purposes only, various accelerated
depreciation provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. In addition, certain
other
costs are expensed currently for tax purposes while being deferred for book
purposes. Effective October 1, 2007, generally accepted accounting
principles require that tax benefits be recognized in the financial statements
as determined by new recognition and measurement provisions. These provisions
permit the benefit from a tax position to be recognized only if, and to the
extent that, it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained
upon examination by the taxing authority, based on the technical merits of
the
position. Unrecognized tax benefits and related interest and penalties, if
any,
are recorded as liabilities. Laclede Group companies record deferred tax
liabilities and assets measured by enacted tax rates for the net tax effect
of
all temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities
in the financial statements, and the related tax basis. Changes in enacted
tax
rates, if any, and certain property basis differences will be reflected by
entries to regulatory asset or liability accounts for regulated companies,
and
will be reflected as income or loss for non-regulated companies.
Laclede
Gas’ investment tax credits utilized prior to 1986 have been deferred and are
being amortized in accordance with regulatory treatment over the useful life
of
the related property.
GROSS
RECEIPTS TAXES - Gross
receipts taxes associated with Laclede Gas’ natural gas utility service are
imposed on the Utility and billed to its customers. These amounts are recorded
gross in the Statements of Consolidated Income. Amounts recorded in Regulated
Gas Distribution Operating Revenues for the quarters ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 were $13.0 million, and $14.7 million,
respectively. Gross receipts taxes are expensed by the Utility and included
in
the Taxes Other Than Income line.
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION –
Awards of stock-based compensation are made pursuant to The Laclede
Group 2006
Equity Incentive Plan and the Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors.
Refer to Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the
Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 for
descriptions of these plans.
During
the quarter ended December 31, 2007, the Company awarded 74,100 shares
of performance-contingent restricted stock to executive officers. This number
of
shares represents the maximum shares that can be earned pursuant to the terms
of
the awards. The shares have a performance period ending in September 2010,
during which participants are entitled to receive full dividends and voting
rights on 49,400 of these shares based on the target level of performance.
The
number of shares that will ultimately vest is dependent upon the attainment
of
certain levels of earnings and dividend growth performance goals; further,
under
the terms of the award, the Compensation Committee (Committee) of the Board
of
Directors may reduce by up to 50% the number of shares that vest if the
Company’s total shareholder return (TSR) during the performance period ranks in
the bottom quartile relative to a comparator group of companies. This TSR
provision is considered a market condition under generally accepted accounting
principles and is discussed further below.
9
During
the quarter ended December 31, 2007, the Company made a separate award
of 15,000 shares of performance-contingent restricted stock to an executive
officer. This number of shares represents the maximum shares that can be earned
pursuant to the terms of the award. The shares have a performance period ending
in September 2009, during which the participant is entitled to receive full
dividends and voting rights on 10,000 of these shares based on the target level
of performance. The number of shares that will ultimately vest is dependent
upon
the attainment of certain business development performance metrics and
succession management objectives and is not subject to the aforementioned TSR
provision.
For
performance-contingent restricted shares that do not pay dividends during the
performance period, the estimate of fair value is reduced by the present value
of the dividends expected to be paid on the Company’s common stock during the
performance period, discounted using an appropriate U.S. Treasury yield. Initial
accruals of compensation cost for performance-contingent restricted stock awards
are based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions. For shares
that do not vest or are not expected to vest due to the outcome of the
performance conditions, no compensation cost is recognized and any previously
recognized compensation cost is reversed. For shares subject to the TSR
provision, the estimated impact of this market condition is reflected in the
grant date fair value per share of the awards. Accordingly, compensation cost
is
not reversed to reflect any actual reductions in the awards that may result
from
the TSR provision. However, if the Company’s TSR during the performance period
ranks in the bottom quartile relative to a comparator group of companies and
the
Committee elects not to reduce the award (or reduce by a lesser amount), this
election would be accounted for as a modification of the original award and
additional compensation cost would be recognized at that time. The grant date
fair value per share of the awards subject to the TSR provision awarded during
the quarter ended December 31, 2007 was valued by a model that assessed the
probabilities of various TSR outcomes. Performance-contingent restricted stock
awards without a TSR provision are valued at the closing price of the Company’s
stock on the date of the grant.
During
the quarter ended December 31, 2007, the Company awarded 23,250 shares
of time-vested restricted stock to executives and key employees. These shares
vest in December 2010. In the interim, participants receive full dividends
and voting rights. Time-vested restricted stock awards are valued at the closing
price of the Company’s stock on the date of the grant.
No
stock options were granted during the quarter ended December 31, 2007.
The weighted average fair value of stock options granted during the quarter
ended December 31, 2006 was $8.07 per option.
Stock
option activity for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 is presented
below:
Weighted
|
||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
||||||||||||||||||
Weighted
|
Remaining
|
Aggregate
|
||||||||||||||||
Average
|
Contractual
|
Intrinsic
|
||||||||||||||||
Exercise
|
Term
|
Value
|
||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Price
|
(Years)
|
($000)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at September 30, 2007
|
617,100
|
$
|
30.04
|
|||||||||||||||
Granted
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
|||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(11,000
|
)
|
$
|
28.07
|
||||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(11,875
|
)
|
$
|
30.86
|
||||||||||||||
Expired
|
(7,750
|
)
|
$
|
31.14
|
||||||||||||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2007
|
586,475
|
$
|
30.04
|
6.9
|
$
|
2,536
|
||||||||||||
Fully
Vested and Expected to Vest
at
December 31, 2007
|
573,612
|
$
|
29.99
|
6.8
|
$
|
2,511
|
||||||||||||
Exercisable
at December 31, 2007
|
402,725
|
$
|
28.90
|
6.4
|
$
|
2,171
|
10
The
closing price of the Company’s common stock was $34.24 at
December 31, 2007.
The
amounts of compensation cost recognized for share-based compensation
arrangements for the quarters ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are
presented below:
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|||||||
|
December
31,
|
|
|||||||
(Thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||||
Total
compensation cost
|
$
|
656
|
$
|
540
|
|||||
Compensation
cost capitalized
|
(135
|
)
|
(118
|
)
|
|||||
Compensation
cost recognized in net income
|
521
|
422
|
|||||||
Income
tax benefit recognized in net income
|
(201
|
)
|
(163
|
)
|
|||||
Compensation
cost recognized in net income, net of income tax
|
$
|
320
|
$
|
259
|
As
of December 31, 2007, there was approximately $5.5 million of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation
arrangements (options and restricted stock). That cost is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.4
years.
NEW
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS – In
June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Interpretation Number 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.”
FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized
in an
enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109,
“Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under FIN 48, the Company may recognize the tax
benefit from a tax position only if it is at least more likely than not that
the
tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based
on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the
financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the
largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being
realized upon settlement with the taxing authorities. FIN 48 also provides
guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting
in
interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The Company adopted the provisions
of FIN 48 as of October 1, 2007. For details regarding the cumulative
effect of adoption and other pertinent information, see Note 5, Income
Taxes.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” This Statement defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
The Statement applies to fair value measurements required under other accounting
guidance that require or permit fair value measurements. Accordingly, this
Statement does not require any new fair value measurements. The guidance in
this
Statement does not apply to the Company’s stock-based compensation plans
accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment.” This
Statement will be effective for the Company as of the beginning of fiscal year
2009. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this
Statement.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans.” As discussed in Note 2
to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Fiscal
Year 2007 Form 10-K, Laclede Group adopted the recognition and disclosure
provisions of this Statement effective September 30, 2007. The
Statement also requires that plan assets and benefit obligations be measured
as
of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end statement of financial position.
This requirement is effective for the Company as of the end of fiscal year
2009.
In conjunction with adoption of this provision of SFAS No. 158, the Company
will
be required to change its valuation date for its pension and other
postretirement plans from June 30 to September 30. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of adoption of the change in measurement date
on
its consolidated financial statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” The Statement permits entities to
choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. SFAS No.
159
also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate
comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for
similar types of assets and liabilities. This Statement does not affect any
existing accounting literature that requires certain assets and liabilities
to
be carried at fair value. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 159, entities are permitted
to choose, at specified election dates, to measure eligible items at fair value
(fair value option). Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair
value option has been elected are reported in earnings at each reporting date.
The decision about whether to elect the fair value option is applied instrument
by instrument with few exceptions. The decision is also irrevocable (unless
a
new election date occurs) and must be applied to entire instruments and not
to
portions of instruments. SFAS No. 159 requires that cash flows related to items
measured at fair value be classified in the statement of cash flows according
to
their nature and purpose as required by SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows”
(as amended). SFAS No. 159 is effective for the Company as of the beginning
of
fiscal year 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this
Statement.
11
In
June 2007, the FASB ratified the consensus reached in Emerging Issues Task
Force (EITF) Issue No. 06-11, “Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends
on Share-Based Payment Awards.” This Issue addresses how an entity should
recognize the tax benefit received on dividends that are (a) paid to employees
holding equity-classified nonvested shares, equity-classified nonvested share
units, or equity-classified outstanding share options and (b) charged to
retained earnings under SFAS No. 123(R). The Task Force reached a consensus
that
such tax benefits should be recognized as an increase in additional paid-in
capital. This EITF Issue also addresses how the accounting for these tax
benefits is affected if an entity’s estimate of forfeitures changes in
subsequent periods. This EITF Issue is effective for Laclede Group as of the
beginning of fiscal year 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the
provisions of this EITF Issue.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements.” This Statement amends Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements.” A noncontrolling interest,
sometimes called a minority interest, is the portion of equity in a subsidiary
not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. SFAS No. 160 clarifies
that noncontrolling interests should be separately reported as equity in the
balance sheet. Additionally, SFAS No. 160 requires certain changes in
presentation to income statements. SFAS No. 160 also addresses accounting for
changes in the parent’s ownership interest of a subsidiary, accounting for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary, and disclosure requirements. This Statement
is
effective for Laclede Group as of the beginning of fiscal year 2010. Currently,
all of Laclede Group’s consolidated subsidiaries are wholly owned and therefore
adoption of this Statement is not expected to have any effect on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) (141(R)),
“Business Combinations.” This Statement revises SFAS No. 141 but retains the
fundamental requirements in SFAS No. 141 that the acquisition method
(formerly known as purchase method) of accounting be used for all business
combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) requires an acquirer to recognize the assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that
date,
with limited exceptions specified in the Statement. SFAS 141(R) requires
acquisition-related costs to be accounted for separately instead of being
allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. SFAS No. 141(R) also
amends the guidance related to the recognition of certain assets acquired and
liabilities assumed that relate to contingencies, research and development
assets acquired that have no alternative future use, and negative goodwill
arising from a bargain purchase. Laclede Group is required to adopt SFAS No.
141(R) prospectively to business combinations with acquisition dates on or
after
October 1, 2009 (fiscal 2010). Because this Statement is only applicable to
future business combinations, existing amounts reported on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements will not be impacted by adoption of this
Statement.
2.
|
EARNINGS
PER SHARE
|
SFAS
No. 128, “Earnings Per Share,” requires dual presentation of basic and diluted
earnings per share (EPS). Basic EPS does not include potentially dilutive
securities and is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS assumes the issuance
of common shares pursuant to the Company’s stock-based compensation plans at the
beginning of each respective period, or at the date of grant or award, if later.
Shares attributable to stock options and time-vested restricted stock are
excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share if the effect would
be antidilutive. For the quarters ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
105,500 and 115,500 shares, respectively, attributable to antidilutive
outstanding stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings
per share. Performance-contingent restricted stock awards are only included
in
the calculation of diluted earnings per share to the extent the underlying
performance conditions are satisfied (a) prior to the end of the reporting
period or (b) would be satisfied if the end of the reporting period were the
end
of the related contingency period and the result would be dilutive. For the
quarters ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, 191,100 and 110,000 shares,
respectively, of nonvested performance-contingent restricted stock were excluded
from the calculation of diluted earnings per share.
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|||||
(Thousands,
Except Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,903
|
|
$
|
19,087
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,554
|
|
|
21,381
|
|
|
|
Earnings
Per Share of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.97
|
|
$
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Diluted
EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,903
|
|
$
|
19,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Weighted
Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,554
|
|
|
21,381
|
|
|
|
Dilutive
Effect of Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
and
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Diluted Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,621
|
|
|
21,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Earnings
Per Share of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.97
|
|
$
|
0.89
|
|
|
3.
|
PENSION
PLANS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT
BENEFITS
|
Laclede
Gas has non-contributory defined benefit, trusteed forms of pension plans
covering substantially all employees over the age of twenty-one. Benefits are
based on years of service and the employee’s compensation during the highest
three years of the last ten years of employment. Plan assets consist primarily
of corporate and U.S. government obligations and pooled equity
funds.
Pension
costs for the quarters ending December 31, 2007 and 2006 were $1.5
million and $1.4 million, respectively, including amounts charged to
construction.
The
net periodic pension costs include the following components:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|||||
(Thousands)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
cost - benefits earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
during
the period
|
|
$
|
3,242
|
$
|
3,106
|
|
|||
Interest
cost on projected
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
benefit
obligation
|
|
|
4,670
|
|
4,482
|
|
|||
Expected
return on plan assets
|
|
|
(5,162
|
)
|
|
(5,074
|
)
|
|
|
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
|
|
272
|
|
284
|
|
|||
Amortization
of actuarial loss
|
|
|
791
|
|
920
|
|
|||
Sub-total
|
3,813
|
3,718
|
|||||||
Regulatory
adjustment
|
|
|
(2,280
|
)
|
|
(2,364
|
)
|
|
|
Net
pension cost
|
|
$
|
1,533
|
$
|
1,354
|
|
Pursuant
to the provisions of the Laclede Gas pension plans, pension obligations may
be
satisfied by lump-sum cash payments. Pursuant to a Missouri Public Service
Commission (MoPSC or Commission) Order, lump-sum payments are recognized as
settlements (which can result in gains or losses) only if the total of such
payments exceeds 100% of the sum of service and interest costs. No lump-sum
payments were recognized as settlements during the three months ended
December 31, 2007 or 2006.
13
Pursuant
to a MoPSC Order, the return on plan assets is based on the market-related
value
of plan assets implemented prospectively over a four-year period. Gains or
losses not yet includible in pension cost are amortized only to the extent
that
such gain or loss exceeds 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation
or the market-related value of plan assets. Such excess is amortized over the
average remaining service life of active participants. The recovery in rates
for
the Utility’s qualified pension plans is based on an allowance of $4.1 million
annually effective October 1, 2005 and $4.8 million annually effective
August 1, 2007. The difference between this amount and pension expense
as calculated pursuant to the above and that otherwise would be included in
the
Statements of Consolidated Income and Consolidated Comprehensive Income is
deferred as a regulatory asset or regulatory liability.
SM&P
maintains a non-qualified, defined benefit plan with four participants that
was
frozen to new participants in 2002. The plan is a non-qualified plan and
therefore has no assets held in trust. Net pension cost related to the plan
is
not material.
Laclede
Gas provides certain life insurance benefits at retirement. Medical insurance
is
available after early retirement until age 65. The transition obligation not
yet
includible in postretirement benefit cost is being amortized over 20 years.
Postretirement benefit costs for the quarters ended December 31, 2007
and 2006 were $1.9 million and $2.0 million, respectively, including amounts
charged to construction.
Net
periodic postretirement benefit costs consisted of the following
components:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|||||
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|||||
(Thousands)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
cost – benefits earned during
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the
period
|
|
$
|
1,140
|
$
|
1,016
|
|||
Interest
cost on accumulated
|
|
|
|
|||||
postretirement
benefit obligation
|
|
|
977
|
|
900
|
|||
Expected
return on plan assets
|
|
|
(510
|
)
|
|
(431
|
)
|
|
Amortization
of transition obligation
|
|
|
34
|
|
34
|
|||
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
Amortization
of actuarial loss
|
|
|
746
|
|
811
|
|||
Sub-total
|
1,805
|
1,748
|
||||||
Regulatory
adjustment
|
|
|
105
|
|
223
|
|||
Net
postretirement benefit cost
|
|
$
|
1,910
|
$
|
1,971
|
Missouri
state law provides for the recovery in rates of SFAS No. 106, “Employers’
Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions,” accrued costs
provided that such costs are funded through an independent, external funding
mechanism. Laclede Gas established Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association
(VEBA) and Rabbi trusts as its external funding mechanisms. VEBA and Rabbi
trusts’ assets consist primarily of money market securities and mutual funds
invested in stocks and bonds.
Pursuant
to a MoPSC Order, the return on plan assets is based on the market-related
value
of plan assets implemented prospectively over a four-year period. Gains and
losses not yet includible in postretirement benefit cost are amortized only
to
the extent that such gain or loss exceeds 10% of the greater of the accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation or the market-related value of plan assets.
Such excess is amortized over the average remaining service life of active
participants. Previously, the recovery in rates for the postretirement benefit
costs was based on an alternative methodology for amortization of unrecognized
gains and losses as ordered by the MoPSC. The Commission ordered that the
recovery in rates be based on an annual allowance of $7.6 million, effective
August 1, 2007. The difference between this amount and postretirement
benefit cost based on the above and that otherwise would be included in the
Statements of Consolidated Income and Consolidated Comprehensive Income is
deferred as a regulatory asset or regulatory liability.
4.
|
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS
|
In
the course of its business, Laclede Group’s non-regulated gas marketing
affiliate, Laclede Energy Resources, Inc. (LER), enters into fixed-price
commitments associated with the purchase or sale of natural gas. LER manages
the
price risk associated with these commitments by either closely matching the
offsetting physical purchase or sale of natural gas at fixed prices or through
the use of exchange-traded futures contracts to lock in margins. At
December 31, 2007, LER’s unmatched positions were not material to
Laclede Group’s financial position or results of operations.
14
Settled
and open futures positions were as follows at
December 31, 2007:
Position
Month
|
MMBtu
(millions)
|
Average
Price
per
MMBtu
|
|||||||
Settled
short positions
|
January
2008
|
1.46
|
$
|
8.17
|
|||||
Settled
long positions
|
January
2008
|
.14
|
7.29
|
||||||
Open
short futures positions
|
February
2008
|
.11
|
8.90
|
||||||
March
2008
|
.03
|
7.27
|
|||||||
April
2008
|
1.74
|
8.28
|
|||||||
May
2008
|
.03
|
7.36
|
|||||||
June
2008
|
.03
|
7.46
|
|||||||
July
2008
|
.03
|
7.55
|
|||||||
August
2008
|
.03
|
7.64
|
|||||||
September
2008
|
.03
|
7.67
|
|||||||
October
2008
|
.03
|
7.74
|
|||||||
November
2008
|
.14
|
8.67
|
|||||||
December
2008
|
.18
|
8.82
|
|||||||
January
2009
|
.15
|
8.87
|
|||||||
February
2009
|
.15
|
8.87
|
|||||||
March
2009
|
.11
|
8.83
|
|||||||
November
2009
|
.10
|
8.80
|
|||||||
December
2009
|
.15
|
8.83
|
|||||||
January
2010
|
.15
|
8.83
|
|||||||
February
2010
|
.15
|
8.83
|
|||||||
March
2010
|
.10
|
8.80
|
|||||||
Open
long futures positions
|
May
2008
|
.06
|
7.60
|
||||||
June
2008
|
.06
|
7.60
|
|||||||
July
2008
|
.06
|
7.60
|
|||||||
August
2008
|
.06
|
7.60
|
|||||||
September
2008
|
.06
|
7.60
|
|||||||
October
2008
|
.06
|
7.60
|
|||||||
November
2008
|
.06
|
7.60
|
|||||||
December
2008
|
.06
|
7.60
|
The
above futures contracts are derivative instruments and management has designated
these items as cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions. The fair values
of
the instruments are recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The change
in
the fair value of the effective portion of these hedge instruments is recorded,
net of tax, in Other Comprehensive Income, a component of Common Stock Equity.
These amounts will reduce or be charged to Non-Regulated Gas Marketing Operating
Revenues or Expenses in the Statements of Consolidated Income as the hedged
transactions occur. As of December 31, 2007, it is expected that
approximately $3.1 million of pre-tax unrealized gains will be reclassified
into
the Consolidated Statement of Income during the next twelve months. The
ineffective portions of these hedge instruments are charged or credited to
Non-Regulated Gas Marketing Operating Revenues or Expenses. The net amount
of
pre-tax gains recognized in earnings for the ineffective portion of cash flow
hedges was $0.3 million and $0.5 million for the quarters ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Cash flows from hedging
transactions are classified in the same category as the cash flows from the
items that are being hedged in the Statements of Consolidated Cash
Flows.
5.
|
INCOME
TAXES
|
The
Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48, “Accounting for the Uncertainty in
Income Taxes,” as of October 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting
for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial
statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income
Taxes.” Pursuant to FIN 48, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from a tax
position only if it is at least more likely than not that the tax position
will
be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical
merits of the position.
15
Upon
adoption of FIN 48, the Company recognized a reduction to beginning retained
earnings for a cumulative-effect adjustment totaling $1.1 million, reclassified
$2.5 million of income tax liabilities from current to non-current liabilities,
and increased its liabilities for accrued interest and penalties. Total
unrecognized tax benefits as of October 1, 2007 were $2.1 million, all
of which would favorably impact the effective tax rate, if recognized. The
Company recognizes potential accrued interest and penalties related to its
uncertain tax positions as interest expense and other income deductions,
respectively. Potential interest and penalties accrued (net of income tax
benefit) associated with the Company’s uncertain tax positions were $1.5 million
at October 1, 2007. Unrecognized tax benefits, accrued interest
payable, and accrued penalties payable are included in the Other line of the
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities section of the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. There have been no material changes in the Company’s unrecognized tax
benefits since the date of adoption of FIN 48.
The
Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of state
and
city jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to examination for fiscal
years prior to 2004. The Company cannot currently estimate the potential change
in its unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12-month period because of
current audit activity.
6.
|
OTHER
INCOME AND INCOME DEDUCTIONS – NET
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|||||
(Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for funds used during construction
|
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
1,773
|
1,945
|
|||||||||
Other
income
|
|
|
|
|
537
|
|
323
|
|
|||
Other
income deductions
|
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
1,049
|
|
|||
Other
income and (income deductions) – net
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,650
|
$
|
3,303
|
|
The
decrease in other income and income deductions – net for the quarter ended
December 31, 2007, compared with the quarter ended
December 31, 2006, was due to decreased income associated with changes
in the cash surrender value of life insurance policies, lower income associated
with carrying costs applied to under-recoveries of gas costs, and other minor
variations. Such carrying costs are recovered through the Utility’s Purchased
Gas Adjustment (PGA) Clause.
7.
|
INFORMATION
BY OPERATING SEGMENT
|
All
of Laclede Group’s subsidiaries are wholly owned. The Regulated Gas Distribution
segment consists of the regulated operations of Laclede Gas and is the core
business segment of Laclede Group. Laclede Gas is a public utility engaged
in
the retail distribution and sale of natural gas serving an area in eastern
Missouri, with a population of approximately 2.1 million, including the City
of
St. Louis and parts of ten other counties in eastern Missouri. The Non-Regulated
Services segment includes the results of SM&P, an underground facilities
locating and marking business operating in ten Midwestern and Southwestern
states. The underground facility locating industry remains competitive with
many
contracts subject to termination on short-term notice. Also, SM&P’s
customers are concentrated primarily in the utility and telecommunications
sectors. Additionally, SM&P’s results can be influenced by seasonality and
trends in the construction sector. The Non-Regulated Gas Marketing segment
includes the results of LER, a subsidiary engaged in the non-regulated marketing
of natural gas and related activities. Other includes the transportation of
liquid propane regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
and
other non-regulated activities, including real estate development, the
compression of natural gas, and financial investments in other enterprises.
These operations are conducted through five subsidiaries. Other also includes
Laclede Gas’ non-regulated merchandise sales business. Certain intersegment
revenues with Laclede Gas are not eliminated in accordance with the provisions
of SFAS No. 71, “Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation.”
Those types of transactions include sales of natural gas from Laclede Gas to
LER, services performed by SM&P to locate and mark underground facilities
for Laclede Gas, sales of natural gas from LER to Laclede Gas, and
transportation services provided by Laclede Pipeline Company to Laclede Gas.
These revenues are shown on the Intersegment revenues lines in the table under
Regulated Gas Distribution, Non-Regulated Services, Non-Regulated Gas Marketing,
and Other columns, respectively.
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Regulated
|
|
Non-
|
|
Regulated
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Gas
|
|
Regulated
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
&
|
|
|
|
||||||||
(Thousands)
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Services
|
|
Marketing
|
|
Other
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
from external
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
customers
|
|
$
|
319,674
|
|
$
|
37,260
|
$
|
178,660
|
$
|
1,039
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
536,633
|
|
|||||
Intersegment
revenues
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
102
|
|
3,138
|
|
260
|
|
—
|
|
4,718
|
|
|||||
Total
operating revenues
|
|
|
320,892
|
|
|
37,362
|
|
181,798
|
|
1,299
|
|
—
|
|
541,351
|
|
|||||
Net
income (loss)
|
|
|
15,747
|
|
|
(727
|
)
|
|
5,654
|
|
229
|
|
—
|
|
20,903
|
|
||||
Total
assets
|
|
|
1,529,861
|
|
|
74,818
|
|
123,363
|
|
97,021
|
|
(77,378
|
)
|
|
1,747,685
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
from external
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
customers
|
|
$
|
340,456
|
|
$
|
36,337
|
$
|
137,688
|
|
$
|
917
|
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
515,398
|
|
|||
Intersegment
revenues
|
|
|
8,032
|
|
|
92
|
|
15,779
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
—
|
|
24,163
|
|
|||
Total
operating revenues
|
|
|
348,488
|
|
|
36,429
|
|
153,467
|
|
|
1,177
|
|
|
—
|
|
539,561
|
|
|||
Net
income (loss)
|
|
|
15,657
|
|
|
(504
|
)
|
|
3,795
|
|
|
139
|
|
—
|
|
19,087
|
|
|||
Total
assets
|
|
|
1,473,506
|
|
71,884
|
|
112,739
|
|
|
79,518
|
|
|
(56,496
|
)
|
1,681,151
|
|
8.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Laclede
Gas owns and operates natural gas distribution, transmission and storage
facilities, the operations of which are subject to various environmental laws,
regulations and interpretations. While environmental issues resulting from
such
operations arise in the ordinary course of business, such issues have not
materially affected the Company’s or Laclede Gas’ financial position and results
of operations. As environmental laws, regulations, and their interpretations
change, however, Laclede Gas may be required to incur additional costs. See
Note
14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Fiscal
Year 2007 Form 10-K for information relative to environmental matters
generally. There have been no significant changes relative to environmental
matters in the first quarter of 2008.
On
December 28, 2006, the MoPSC Staff proposed a disallowance
of $7.2 million related to Laclede Gas’ recovery of its purchased gas costs
applicable to fiscal 2005. On September 14, 2007, the Staff withdrew
its pursuit of $5.5 million of the disallowance it had originally proposed.
Laclede Gas believes that the remaining $1.7 million of the MoPSC Staff’s
proposed disallowance lacks merit and intends to vigorously oppose the
adjustment in proceedings before the MoPSC.
On
December 31, 2007, the MoPSC Staff filed a memorandum with the
Commission proposing a disallowance of $2.8 million related to the
Company’s recovery of its purchased gas costs applicable to fiscal 2006.
Laclede Gas believes that the MoPSC Staff’s position lacks merit and intends to
vigorously oppose the adjustment in proceedings before the MoPSC. In addition,
the MoPSC’s Staff’s memorandum raised questions regarding whether certain sales
and capacity release transactions subject to the FERC’s oversight were
consistent with the FERC’s regulations and policies regarding capacity release.
The Company has commenced an internal review of the questions raised by the
MoPSC Staff and has notified the FERC Staff that it has taken this
action.
Laclede
Group is involved in other litigation, claims and investigations arising in
the
normal course of business. While the results of such litigation cannot be
predicted with certainty, management, after discussion with counsel, believes
that the final outcome will not have a material adverse effect on the
consolidated financial position or results of operations of the
Company.
Laclede
Gas has several operating leases for the rental of vehicles that contain
provisions requiring Laclede Gas to guarantee certain amounts related to the
residual value of the leased property. These leases have various terms, the
longest of which extends through 2014. At December 31, 2007, the
maximum guarantees under these leases are $1.8 million. However, the Utility
estimates that the residual value of the leased vehicles will be adequate to
satisfy most of the guaranteed amounts. At December 31, 2007, the
carrying value of the liability recognized for these guarantees was $0.3
million.
17
SM&P
has several operating leases, the aggregate annual cost of which is $8.3
million, consisting primarily of 12-month operating leases, with renewal
options, for vehicles used in its business. Laclede Group has parental
guarantees of certain of those vehicle leases and anticipates that the maximum
guarantees, including renewals and new leases, will not exceed $19.0 million.
In
the event Laclede Group would be required to make payments under these
guarantees, it is expected that a significant portion of such payments would
be
recovered through proceeds from the liquidation of assets obtained under the
terms of the leases. The fair market value of the vehicles being leased is
estimated at $15.1 million. No amounts have been recorded for these guarantees
in the financial statements.
Laclede
Gas and LER have entered into various contracts, expiring on dates through
2017,
for the storage, transportation, and supply of natural gas. Minimum payments
required under the contracts in place at December 31, 2007 are
estimated at approximately $1.5 billion. Additional contracts are generally
entered into prior to or during the heating season.
Laclede
Group had guarantees totaling $48.8 million for performance and payment of
certain wholesale gas supply purchases by LER, as of
December 31, 2007. Since that date, total guarantees issued by Laclede
Group on behalf of LER increased by $1.2 million bringing the total to $50.0
million in guarantees outstanding at January 30, 2008. No amounts have
been recorded for these guarantees in the financial statements.
Laclede
Gas Company’s Financial Statements and Notes to Financial Statements are
included in Exhibit 99.1 to this report.
18
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
THE
LACLEDE GROUP, INC.
This
management’s discussion analyzes the financial condition and results of
operations of The Laclede Group, Inc. (Laclede Group or the Company) and its
subsidiaries. It includes management’s view of factors that affect its business,
explanations of past financial results including changes in earnings and costs
from the prior year periods, and their effects on overall financial condition
and liquidity.
Certain
matters discussed in this report, excluding historical information, include
forward-looking statements. Certain words, such as “may,” “anticipate,”
“believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “seek,” and similar words and
expressions identify forward-looking statements that involve uncertainties
and
risks. Future developments may not be in accordance with our expectations or
beliefs and the effect of future developments may not be those anticipated.
Among the factors that may cause results to differ materially from those
contemplated in any forward-looking statement are:
•
|
weather
conditions and catastrophic events, particularly severe weather in
the
natural gas producing areas of the country;
|
|
•
|
volatility
in gas prices, particularly sudden and sustained spikes in natural
gas
prices;
|
|
•
|
the
impact of higher natural gas prices on our competitive position in
relation to suppliers of alternative heating sources, such as
electricity;
|
|
•
|
changes
in gas supply and pipeline availability; particularly those changes
that
impact supply for and access to our market area;
|
|
•
|
legislative,
regulatory and judicial mandates and decisions, some of which may
be
retroactive, including those affecting
|
|
•
|
allowed
rates of return
|
|
•
|
incentive
regulation
|
|
•
|
industry
structure
|
|
•
|
purchased
gas adjustment provisions
|
|
•
|
rate
design structure and implementation
|
|
•
|
franchise
renewals
|
|
•
|
environmental
or safety matters
|
|
•
|
taxes
|
|
•
|
pension
and other postretirement benefit liabilities and funding
obligations
|
|
•
|
accounting
standards;
|
|
•
|
the
results of litigation;
|
|
•
|
retention
of, ability to attract, ability to collect from and conservation
efforts
of customers;
|
|
•
|
capital
and energy commodity market conditions, including the ability to
obtain
funds for necessary capital expenditures and general operations and
the
terms and conditions imposed for obtaining sufficient gas
supply;
|
|
•
|
discovery
of material weakness in internal controls; and
|
|
•
|
employee
workforce issues.
|
Readers
are urged to consider the risks, uncertainties and other factors that could
affect our business as described in this report. All forward-looking statements
made in this report rely upon the safe harbor protections provided under the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We do not, by including this
statement, assume any obligation to review or revise any particular
forward-looking statement in light of future events.
The
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated
Financial Statements and the Notes thereto.
19
THE
LACLEDE GROUP, INC.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Laclede
Group’s earnings are primarily derived from the regulated activities of its
largest subsidiary, Laclede Gas Company (Laclede Gas or the Utility), Missouri’s
largest natural gas distribution company. Laclede Gas is regulated by the
Missouri Public Service Commission (MoPSC or Commission) and serves the City
of
St. Louis and parts of ten other counties in eastern Missouri. Laclede Gas
delivers natural gas to retail customers at rates, and in accordance with
tariffs, authorized by the MoPSC. The Utility’s earnings are primarily generated
by the sale of heating energy. The Utility’s innovative weather mitigation rate
design lessens the impact of weather volatility on Laclede Gas customers during
cold winters and stabilizes the Utility’s earnings by recovering fixed costs
more evenly during the heating season. Due to the seasonal nature of the
business of Laclede Gas, Laclede Group’s earnings are seasonal in nature and are
typically concentrated in the November through April period, which generally
corresponds with the heating season.
SM&P
Utility Resources, Inc. (SM&P) is a non-regulated underground facility
locating and marking service business. The underground locating industry remains
competitive with many contracts subject to termination on short-term notice.
SM&P’s customers are concentrated primarily in the utility and
telecommunications sectors. Additionally, SM&P’s results can be influenced
by seasonality and trends in the construction sector. During fiscal
year 2007, the Company received unsolicited inquiries from various third
parties regarding the Company’s interest in exploring strategic alternatives
involving SM&P. While the Board has made no decision to engage in any
strategic transaction involving SM&P, toward the end of fiscal 2007 it
authorized the Company’s management to assess: (1) the market value of SM&P;
and (2) the benefits to the Company and its shareholders of a potential sale
of
SM&P. No decision regarding SM&P has been made as of the date of filing
of this report. Accordingly, a transaction may or may not ultimately result
from
this process.
Laclede
Energy Resources, Inc. (LER) is engaged in the non-regulated marketing of
natural gas and related activities. LER markets natural gas to both on-system
Utility transportation customers and customers outside of Laclede Gas’
traditional service territory, including large retail and wholesale customers.
As such, LER’s operations and customer base are subject to fluctuations in
market conditions.
Other
subsidiaries provide less than 10% of consolidated revenues.
Laclede
Group’s strategy continues to include efforts to stabilize and improve the
performance of its core Utility, while developing non-regulated businesses
and
taking a measured approach in the pursuit of additional growth opportunities
that complement the Utility business.
As
for the Utility, mitigating the impact of weather fluctuations on Laclede Gas
customers while improving the ability to recover its authorized distribution
costs and return continues to be a fundamental component of Laclede Group’s
strategy. The Utility’s distribution costs are the essential, primarily fixed
expenditures it must incur to operate and maintain a more than 16,000 mile
natural gas distribution system and related storage facilities. In addition,
Laclede Gas is working to continually improve its ability to provide reliable
natural gas service at a reasonable cost, while maintaining and building a
secure and dependable infrastructure. The settlement of the Utility’s 2007 rate
case resulted in enhancements to the Utility’s weather mitigation rate design
that better ensure the recovery of its fixed costs and margins despite
variations in sales volumes due to the impacts of weather and other factors
that
affect customer usage. The Utility’s income from off-system sales remains
subject to fluctuations in market conditions. In conjunction with the settlement
of the 2005 rate case, effective October 1, 2005, the Utility retained
all pre-tax income from off-system sales and capacity release revenues up to
$12
million annually. Pre-tax amounts in excess of $12 million were shared with
customers, with the Utility retaining 50% of amounts exceeding that threshold.
The Stipulation & Agreement approved by the MoPSC in the Utility’s 2007 rate
case increases the portion of pre-tax income from off-system sales and capacity
release revenues that is shared with customers. Effective
October 1, 2007, the Utility is allowed to retain 15% to 25% of the
first $6 million in annual income earned (depending on the level of income
earned) and 30% of income exceeding $6 million annually. Some of the factors
impacting the level of off-system sales include the availability and cost of
the
Utility’s natural gas supply, the weather in its service area, and the weather
in other markets. When Laclede Gas’ service area experiences warmer-than-normal
weather while other markets experience colder weather or supply constraints,
some of the Utility’s natural gas supply is available for off-system sales and
there may be a demand for such supply in other markets.
20
Laclede
Gas continues to work actively to reduce the impact of higher costs associated
with wholesale natural gas prices by strategically structuring its natural
gas
supply portfolio and through the use of financial instruments. Nevertheless,
the
cost of purchased gas remains high, relative to historical levels. The Utility’s
Purchased Gas Adjustment (PGA) Clause allows Laclede Gas to flow through to
customers, subject to prudence review, the cost of purchased gas supplies,
including costs, cost reductions, and related carrying costs associated with
the
use of financial instruments to hedge the purchase price of natural gas, as
well
as gas inventory carrying costs. The Utility believes it will continue to be
able to obtain sufficient gas supply. The generally higher price levels may
continue to affect sales volumes (due to the conservation efforts of customers)
and cash flows (associated with the timing of collection of gas costs and
related accounts receivable from customers).
Laclede
Group continues to develop its non-regulated subsidiaries. SM&P is working
to further the logical expansion of its business in both new and existing
markets. LER continues to focus on growing its markets on a long-term and
sustainable basis by providing both on-system Utility transportation customers
and customers outside of Laclede Gas’ traditional service area with another
choice in non-regulated natural gas suppliers. Nevertheless, income from LER’s
operations is subject to fluctuations in market conditions.
Quarter
Ended December 31, 2007
Earnings
Overview
–
Net
Income (Loss) by
Operating Segment
|
|
|
|
Quarter
Ended
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
||||||
(millions,
after-tax)
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulated
Gas Distribution
|
|
|
|
$
|
15.8
|
|
|
$
|
15.7
|
||
Non-Regulated
Services
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
Non-Regulated
Gas Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
||
Other
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
||
Net
Income
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.9
|
|
|
$
|
19.1
|
Laclede
Group’s net income was $20.9 million for the quarter ended
December 31, 2007, compared with $19.1 million for the quarter ended
December 31, 2006. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the
quarter ended December 31, 2007 were $.97 compared with $.89 per share
reported for the same quarter last year. Earnings per share increased compared
to last year primarily due to improved results reported by Laclede Group’s
non-regulated gas marketing segment. Earnings recorded by both Laclede Group’s
regulated gas distribution and non-regulated services segments were essentially
the same as last year. Variations in net income were primarily attributable
to
the factors described below.
Regulated
Gas Distribution net income for the quarter ended December 31, 2007
was slightly better than the quarter ended December 31, 2006. The
benefit of the general rate increase effective August 1, 2007,
totaling $10.1 million, was largely offset by the following factors, quantified
on a pre-tax basis:
•
|
lower
income from off-system sales and capacity release, totaling $3.4
million,
primarily due to a reduction in the Utility’s share of such income
(pursuant to the 2007 rate case);
|
•
|
the
net effect of lower system gas sales margins, primarily due to an
unusually late start to the heating season, and other variations
totaling
$3.2 million; and,
|
•
|
increases
in operation and maintenance expenses totaling $2.2
million.
|
The
Non-Regulated Services segment reported a loss of $0.7 million during the
quarter ended December 31, 2007 compared with a loss of $0.5 million
for the same period last year. The greater loss was primarily attributable
to
increases in SM&P’s operating costs, partially offset by increased
revenues.
The
Non-Regulated Gas Marketing segment reported an increase in earnings of $1.8
million compared with the same period last year, primarily due to higher margins
on sales of natural gas by LER, and to a lesser extent, increased sales
volumes.
21
Regulated
Operating Revenues and Operating Expenses
Laclede
Gas passes on to Utility customers (subject to prudence review) increases and
decreases in the wholesale cost of natural gas in accordance with its PGA
Clause. The volatility of the wholesale natural gas market results in
fluctuations from period to period in the recorded levels of, among other items,
revenues and natural gas cost expense. Nevertheless, increases and decreases
in
the cost of gas associated with system gas sales volumes have no direct effect
on net revenues and net income.
Regulated
operating revenues for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 were $320.9
million, or $27.6 million less than the same period last year. Temperatures
experienced in the Utility’s service area during the quarter were 8.5% warmer
than normal and essentially the same as the comparable period last year. Total
system therms sold and transported were 0.27 billion for the quarter ended
December 31, 2007 compared with 0.28 billion for the same period last
year. Total off-system therms sold and transported were 0.05 billion for the
quarter ended December 31, 2007 compared with 0.07 billion for the
same period last year. The decrease in regulated operating revenues was
primarily attributable to the following factors:
|
|
Millions
|
|
|
Lower
wholesale gas costs passed on to Utility customers (subject to prudence
review by the MoPSC)
|
$
|
(20.8
|
)
|
|
General
rate increase, effective August 1, 2007
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Lower
off-system sales volumes
|
(9.6
|
)
|
||
Lower
system sales volumes and other variations
|
(8.1
|
)
|
||
Higher
prices charged for off-system sales
|
1.3
|
|||
Lower
Infrastructure System Replacement Surcharges (ISRS)
revenues
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
Total
Variation
|
|
$
|
(27.6
|
)
|
Regulated
operating expenses for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 decreased
$28.4 million from the same quarter last year. Natural and propane gas expense
decreased $28.7 million, or 11.4%, from last year’s level, primarily
attributable to lower rates charged by our suppliers, lower system volumes
purchased for sendout, and lower off-system gas expense. Other operation and
maintenance expenses increased $2.2 million, or 5.5%, primarily due to higher
injuries and damages expense, increased maintenance charges, a higher provision
for uncollectible accounts, and higher wage rates, partially offset by lower
group insurance charges. Taxes, other than income, decreased $2.1 million,
or
11.1%, primarily due to decreased gross receipts taxes (attributable to the
decreased revenues) and lower property taxes.
Non-Regulated
Services Operating Revenues and Operating Expenses
Laclede
Group’s non-regulated services operating revenues for this quarter increased
$0.9 million compared to the same quarter last year primarily due to SM&P’s
attainment of new business in existing markets. The increase in non-regulated
services operating expenses totaling $1.3 million was attributable to increased
operating expenses due to growth and other cost increases.
Non-Regulated
Gas Marketing Operating Revenues and Operating Expenses
Non-regulated
gas marketing operating revenues increased $28.3 million primarily due to
increased sales volumes and higher per unit gas sales prices by LER. The
increase in non-regulated gas marketing operating expenses totaling $25.2
million was primarily associated with increased volumes purchased and higher
prices charged by suppliers.
Other
Income and (Income Deductions) - Net
Other
income and income deductions – net decreased $0.7 million due to decreased
income associated with changes in the cash surrender value of life insurance
policies, lower income associated with carrying costs applied to
under-recoveries of gas costs, and other minor variations. Such carrying costs
are recovered through the Utility’s PGA Clause.
Income
Taxes
The
$1.0 million increase in income taxes was primarily due to higher pre-tax
income.
22
REGULATORY
MATTERS
During
fiscal 2006, the MoPSC approved permanent modifications to the Cold Weather
Rule
affecting the disconnection and reconnection practices of utilities during
the
winter heating season. Those modifications included provisions to allow the
Utility to obtain accounting authorizations and defer for future recovery
certain costs incurred with the modifications. During fiscal 2007, the
Utility deferred for future recovery $2.7 million of costs associated with
the
fiscal 2007 heating season. On October 31, 2007, the Utility
filed for determination and subsequent recovery of the deferred amount. On
November 16, 2007, the MoPSC directed the MoPSC Staff and the Missouri
Office of Public Counsel to submit their positions regarding the Utility’s
filing by February 28, 2008.
On
November 9, 2007, the Utility made an ISRS filing with the Commission
designed to increase revenues by $1.6 million annually, pending approval by
the
Commission. On January 15, 2008, the Commission approved
implementation of the surcharge to be effective
January 18, 2008.
On
December 28, 2006, the MoPSC Staff proposed a disallowance of $7.2
million related to Laclede Gas’ recovery of its purchased gas costs applicable
to fiscal 2005. On September 14, 2007, the Staff withdrew its pursuit
of $5.5 million of the disallowance it had originally proposed. Laclede Gas
believes that the remaining $1.7 million of the MoPSC Staff’s proposed
disallowance lacks merit and intends to vigorously oppose the adjustment in
proceedings before the MoPSC.
On
December 31, 2007, the MoPSC Staff filed a memorandum with the
Commission proposing a disallowance of $2.8 million related to the Company’s
recovery of its purchased gas costs applicable to fiscal 2006. Laclede Gas
believes that the MoPSC Staff’s position lacks merit and intends to vigorously
oppose the adjustment in proceedings before the MoPSC. In addition, the MoPSC’s
Staff’s memorandum raised questions regarding whether certain sales and capacity
release transactions subject to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(FERC)’s oversight were consistent with the FERC’s regulations and policies
regarding capacity release. The Company has commenced an internal review of
the
questions raised by the MoPSC Staff and has notified the FERC Staff that it
has
taken this action.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our
discussion and analysis of our financial condition, results of operations,
liquidity, and capital resources is based upon our consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Generally accepted
accounting principles require that we make estimates and judgments that affect
the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates
on an
ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various
other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the
results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values
of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Actual results may differ from these estimates. We believe the following
represent the more significant items requiring the use of judgment and estimates
in preparing our consolidated financial statements:
Allowances
for doubtful accounts – Estimates of the collectibility of trade accounts
receivable are based on historical trends, age of receivables, economic
conditions, credit risk of specific customers, and other factors.
The
Utility’s provision for uncollectible accounts is dependent on the
regulatory treatment provided for such costs. As approved by the
MoPSC,
the Utility is allowed to defer for future recovery certain costs
associated with amendments to the Cold Weather Rule.
|
|
Employee
benefits and postretirement obligations – Pension and postretirement
obligations are calculated by actuarial consultants that utilize
several
statistical factors and other assumptions related to future events,
such
as discount rates, returns on plan assets, compensation increases,
and
mortality rates. For the Utility, the amount of expense recognized
and the
amounts reflected in other comprehensive income are dependent upon
the
regulatory treatment provided for such costs, as discussed further
below.
Certain liabilities related to group medical benefits and workers’
compensation claims, portions of which are self-insured and/or contain
“stop-loss” coverage with third-party insurers to limit exposure, are
established based on historical
trends.
|
23
Goodwill
valuation – In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” goodwill is
required to be tested for impairment annually or whenever events
or
circumstances occur that may reduce the value of goodwill. In performing
impairment tests, valuation techniques require the use of estimates
with
regard to discounted future cash flows of operations, involving judgments
based on a broad range of information and historical results. If
the test
indicates impairment has occurred, goodwill would be reduced, adversely
impacting earnings. This test of goodwill impairment may be carried
forward from one year to the next if the most recent fair value
determination exceeded the carrying value by a substantial margin,
the
assets and liabilities that comprise the reporting entity had not
changed
significantly, and the Company believes that based on an analysis
of
events that had occurred and circumstances that had changed since
the most
recent fair value determination, the likelihood that a current fair
value
determination would be less than the current carrying amount is
remote.
|
Laclede
Gas accounts for its regulated operations in accordance with SFAS No. 71,
“Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation.” This Statement sets
forth the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America for those companies whose rates are established by or are
subject to approval by an independent third-party regulator. The provisions
of
SFAS No. 71 require, among other things, that financial statements of a
regulated enterprise reflect the actions of regulators, where appropriate.
These
actions may result in the recognition of revenues and expenses in time periods
that are different than non-regulated enterprises. When this occurs, costs
are
deferred as assets in the balance sheet (regulatory assets) and recorded as
expenses when those amounts are reflected in rates. Also, regulators can impose
liabilities upon a regulated company for amounts previously collected from
customers and for recovery of costs that are expected to be incurred in the
future (regulatory liabilities). Management believes that the current regulatory
environment supports the continued use of SFAS No. 71 and that all regulatory
assets and regulatory liabilities are recoverable or refundable through the
regulatory process. Management believes the following represent the more
significant items recorded through the application of SFAS No. 71:
The
Utility’s PGA Clause allows Laclede Gas to flow through to customers,
subject to prudence review, the cost of purchased gas supplies, including
the costs, cost reductions and related carrying costs associated
with the
Utility’s use of natural gas financial instruments to hedge the purchase
price of natural gas. The difference between actual costs incurred
and
costs recovered through the application of the PGA are recorded as
regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities that are recovered or
refunded in a subsequent period. The PGA Clause also authorizes the
Utility to recover costs it incurs to finance its investment in gas
supplies that are purchased during the storage injection season for
sale
during the heating season. The PGA Clause also permits the application
of
carrying costs to all over- or under-recoveries of gas costs, including
costs and cost reductions associated with the use of financial
instruments. Effective October 1, 2007, the PGA Clause also
provides for a portion of income from off-system sales and capacity
release revenues to be flowed through to customers.
|
|
The
Company records deferred tax liabilities and assets measured by enacted
tax rates for the net tax effect of all temporary differences between
the
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes, and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Changes in
enacted
tax rates, if any, and certain property basis differences will be
reflected by entries to regulatory asset or liability accounts for
regulated companies, and will be reflected as income or loss for
non-regulated companies. Pursuant to the direction of the MoPSC,
Laclede
Gas’ provision for income tax expense for financial reporting purposes
reflects an open-ended method of tax depreciation. Laclede Gas’ provision
for income tax expense also records the income tax effect associated
with
the difference between overheads capitalized to construction for
financial
reporting purposes and those recognized for tax purposes without
recording
an offsetting deferred income tax expense. These two methods are
consistent with the regulatory treatment prescribed by the
MoPSC.
|
|
Asset
retirement obligations are recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 143,
“Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” and Financial Accounting
Standards Board Interpretation Number (FIN) 47, “Accounting for
Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations.” Asset retirement obligations
are calculated using various assumptions related to the timing, method
of
settlement, inflation, and profit margins that third parties would
demand
to settle the future obligations. These assumptions require the use
of
judgment and estimates and may change in future periods as circumstances
dictate. As authorized by the MoPSC, Laclede Gas accrues future removal
costs associated with its property, plant and equipment through its
depreciation rates, even if a legal obligation does not exist as
defined
by SFAS No. 143 and FIN 47. The difference between removal costs
recognized in depreciation rates and the accretion expense and
depreciation expense recognizable under SFAS No. 143 and FIN 47 is
a
timing difference between the recovery of these costs in rates and
their
recognition for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, consistent
with
SFAS No. 71, these differences are deferred as regulatory
liabilities.
|
24
The
amount of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit cost
recognized in the financial statements related to the Utility’s qualified
pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans is based upon
allowances, as approved by the MoPSC, which have been established
in the
rate-making process for the recovery of these costs from customers.
The
differences between these amounts and actual pension and other
postretirement benefit costs incurred for financial reporting purposes
are
deferred as regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities. SFAS No.
158,
“Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Postretirement Plans,” requires that changes that affect the funded status
of pension and other postretirement benefit plans, but that are not
yet
required to be recognized as components of pension and other
postretirement benefit cost, be reflected in other comprehensive
income.
For the Utility’s qualified pension plans and other postretirement benefit
plans, amounts that would otherwise be reflected in other comprehensive
income are deferred with entries to regulatory assets or regulatory
liabilities.
|
For
further discussion of significant accounting policies, see Note 1 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2007.
ACCOUNTING
PRONOUNCEMENTS
The
Company has evaluated or is in the process of evaluating the impact that
recently issued accounting standards will have on the Company’s financial
position or results of operations upon adoption. For disclosures related to
the
adoption of new accounting standards, see the New Accounting Standards section
of Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
FINANCIAL
CONDITION
CREDIT
RATINGS
As
of December 31, 2007, credit ratings for outstanding securities for
Laclede Group and Laclede Gas issues were as follows:
Type
of Facility
|
S&P
|
Moody’s
|
Fitch
|
Laclede
Group Corporate Rating
|
A
|
A-
|
|
Laclede
Gas First Mortgage Bonds
|
A
|
A3
|
A+
|
Laclede
Gas Commercial Paper
|
A-1
|
P-2
|
|
Laclede
Capital Trust I Trust Preferred Securities
|
A-
|
Baa3
|
BBB+
|
The
Company has investment grade ratings, and believes that it will have adequate
access to the financial markets to meet its capital requirements. These ratings
remain subject to review and change by the rating agencies.
CASH
FLOWS
The
Company’s short-term borrowing requirements typically peak during colder months
when Laclede Gas borrows money to cover the lag between when it purchases its
natural gas and when its customers pay for that gas. Changes in the wholesale
cost of natural gas, variations in the timing of collections of gas cost under
the Utility’s PGA Clause, the seasonality of accounts receivable balances, and
the utilization of storage gas inventories cause short-term cash requirements
to
vary during the year, and can cause significant variations in the Utility’s cash
provided by or used in operating activities.
Net
cash used in operating activities for the three months ended
December 31, 2007 was $7.7 million, compared with $31.7 million for
the same period last year. The variation is primarily attributable to increases
in advance customer billings and a reduction in net cash payments associated
with the Utility’s use of natural gas financial instruments. Additionally, while
LER reported improved operating cash flows compared to last year, this was
largely offset by variations associated with the timing of the collections
of
gas cost under the Utility’s PGA Clause.
Net
cash used in investing activities for the three months ended
December 31, 2007 was $14.6 million compared with $13.1 million for
the three months ended December 31, 2006. Cash used in investing
activities primarily reflected capital expenditures in both
periods.
25
Net
cash provided by financing activities was $36.5 million for the three months
ended December 31, 2007 compared with $45.9 million for the three
months ended December 31, 2006. The decrease primarily reflects the
maturity of long-term debt, partially offset by the issuance of additional
short-term debt this year.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As
indicated above, the Company’s short-term borrowing requirements typically peak
during the colder months. These short-term cash requirements have traditionally
been met through the sale of commercial paper supported by lines of credit
with
banks. Laclede Gas has a line of credit in place of $320 million, which expires
in December 2010. In November 2007, the Utility established a seasonal
line of credit of $40 million, which will expire in March 2008. The Utility
had short-term borrowings aggregating to a maximum of $304.5 million at any
one
time during the quarter. Short-term borrowings outstanding at
December 31, 2007 were $294.5 million, including $40 million from the
seasonal line of credit, at a weighted average interest rate of 5.4% per annum.
Based on short-term borrowings at December 31, 2007, a change in
interest rates of 100 basis points would increase or decrease pre-tax earnings
and cash flows by approximately $2.9 million on an annual basis. Portions of
such increases or decreases may be offset through the application of PGA
carrying costs.
Laclede
Gas’ lines of credit include covenants limiting total debt, including short-term
debt, to no more than 70% of total capitalization and requiring earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) to be at least 2.25
times interest expense. On December 31, 2007, total debt was 63% of
total capitalization. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2007,
EBITDA was 3.40 times interest expense.
Laclede
Gas has on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) an effective
shelf registration on Form S-3 for issuance of $350 million of securities.
The
full amount of this shelf registration remains available to Laclede Gas at
this time. The Utility has authority from the MoPSC to issue up to $500 million
in first mortgage bonds, unsecured debt, and equity securities. In
December 2007, pursuant to this authority, the Utility sold 30 shares of
its common stock to Laclede Group for $1.0 million, leaving $495.2 million
remaining under this authorization as of the date of this filing. The amount,
timing and type of additional financing to be issued will depend on cash
requirements and market conditions.
On
November 1, 2007, Laclede Gas paid at maturity $40 million principal
amount of 7 1/2% First Mortgage Bonds. This maturity was funded through
short-term borrowings. At December 31, 2007, Laclede Gas had
fixed-rate long-term debt totaling $310 million. While these long-term debt
issues are fixed-rate, they are subject to changes in fair value as market
interest rates change. However, increases or decreases in fair value would
impact earnings and cash flows only if Laclede Gas were to reacquire any of
these issues in the open market prior to maturity.
Laclede
Group has on file a shelf registration on Form S-3 with the SEC, that allows
for
the issuance of equity securities, other than preferred stock, and debt
securities. Of the $500 million of securities originally registered under this
Form
S-3, $362.4 million remain registered and unissued as of
December 31, 2007. The amount, timing and type of additional financing
to be issued under this shelf registration will depend on cash requirements
and
market conditions.
Short-term
cash requirements outside of Laclede Gas have generally been met with
internally-generated funds. However, Laclede Group has $50 million in working
capital lines of credit, expiring in August 2008, to meet short-term
liquidity needs of its subsidiaries. These lines of credit have covenants
limiting the total debt of the consolidated Laclede Group to no more that 70%
of
the Company’s total capitalization, giving a 50% debt weighting to the
subordinated debt issued to an unconsolidated affiliated trust. This ratio
stood
at 58% on December 31, 2007. These lines have been used to provide
letters of credit on behalf of SM&P, which have not been drawn, and to
provide for seasonal funding needs of the various subsidiaries from time to
time. At December 31, 2007, letters of credit provided on behalf of
SM&P totaled $2.8 million. There were no borrowings under Laclede Group’s
lines during the quarter.
Laclede
Gas has several operating leases for the rental of vehicles that contain
provisions requiring Laclede Gas to guarantee certain amounts related to the
residual value of the leased property. These leases have various terms, the
longest of which extends through 2014. At December 31, 2007, the
maximum guarantees under these leases are $1.8 million. However, the Utility
estimates that the residual value of the leased vehicles will be adequate to
satisfy most of the guaranteed amounts. At December 31, 2007, the
carrying value of the liability recognized for these guarantees was $0.3
million.
26
SM&P
has several operating leases,
the aggregate annual cost of which is $8.3 million, consisting primarily of
12-month operating leases, with renewal options, for vehicles used in its
business. Laclede Group has parental guarantees of certain of those vehicle
leases and anticipates that the maximum guarantees, including renewals and
new
leases, will not exceed $19.0 million. In the event that Laclede Group would
be
required to make payments under these guarantees, it is expected that a
significant portion of such payments would be recovered through proceeds from
the liquidation of assets obtained under the terms of the leases. The fair
market value of the vehicles being leased is estimated at $15.1 million. No
amounts have been recorded for these guarantees in the financial
statements.
Laclede
Group had guarantees totaling $48.8 million for performance and payment of
certain wholesale gas supply purchases by LER, as of
December 31, 2007. Since that date, total guarantees issued by Laclede
Group on behalf of LER increased by $1.2 million bringing the total to $50.0
million in guarantees outstanding at January 30, 2008. No amounts have
been recorded for these guarantees in the financial statements.
Utility
capital expenditures were $13.0 million for the three months ended
December 31, 2007, compared with $11.8 million for the same period
last year. Non-utility capital expenditures were $0.4 million for the three
months ended December 31, 2007 compared with $0.1 million for the same
period last year.
Consolidated
capitalization at December 31, 2007, excluding current obligations of
preferred stock, consisted of 55.3% Laclede Group common stock equity, 0.1%
Laclede Gas preferred stock equity, 5.8% long-term debt to unconsolidated
affiliate trust, and 38.8% Laclede Gas long-term debt.
It
is management’s view that the Company has adequate access to capital markets and
will have sufficient capital resources, both internal and external, to meet
anticipated capital requirements.
The
seasonal nature of Laclede Gas’ sales affects the comparison of certain balance
sheet items at December 31, 2007 and at September 30, 2007,
such as Accounts Receivable - Net, Gas Stored Underground, Notes Payable,
Accounts Payable, Regulatory Assets and Regulatory Liabilities, and Advance
Customer Billings. The Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2006
is presented to facilitate comparison of these items with the corresponding
interim period of the preceding fiscal year.
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
As
of December 31, 2007,
Laclede Group had contractual
obligations with payments due as summarized below (in millions):
Payments
due by period
|
||||||||||||||||
Remaining
|
Fiscal
Years
|
|||||||||||||||
Contractual
Obligations
|
Total
|
Fiscal
Year
2008
|
Fiscal
Years
2009-2010
|
Fiscal
Years
2011-2012
|
2013
and
thereafter
|
|||||||||||
Principal
Payments on Long-Term
Debt
|
$
|
356.4
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
25.0
|
$
|
331.4
|
||||||
Interest
Payments on Long-Term
Debt
|
481.5
|
13.6
|
46.2
|
43.7
|
378.0
|
|||||||||||
Operating
Leases
(a)
|
17.1
|
5.1
|
8.5
|
2.5
|
1.0
|
|||||||||||
Purchase
Obligations – Natural Gas
(b)
|
1,514.0
|
509.2
|
538.0
|
382.7
|
84.1
|
|||||||||||
Purchase
Obligations – Other
(c)
|
110.7
|
12.6
|
18.7
|
16.3
|
63.1
|
|||||||||||
Total
(d)
|
$
|
2,479.7
|
$
|
540.5
|
$
|
611.4
|
$
|
470.2
|
$
|
857.6
|
(a)
|
Operating
lease obligations are primarily for office space, vehicles, and power
operated equipment in the gas distribution and non-regulated services
segments. Additional payments will be incurred if renewal options
are
exercised under the provisions of certain agreements.
|
(b)
|
These
purchase obligations represent the minimum payments required under
existing natural gas transportation and storage contracts and natural
gas
supply agreements in the utility gas distribution and non-regulated
gas
marketing segments. These amounts reflect fixed obligations as well
as
obligations to purchase natural gas at future market prices, calculated
using December 31, 2007 New York Mercantile Exchange futures
prices. Laclede Gas recovers the costs related to its purchases,
transportation, and storage of natural gas through the operation
of its
Purchased Gas Adjustment Clause, subject to prudence review; however,
variations in the timing of collections of gas costs from customers
affect
short-term cash requirements. Additional contractual commitments
are
generally entered into prior to or during the heating
season.
|
27
(c)
|
These
purchase obligations reflect miscellaneous agreements for the purchase
of
materials and the procurement of services necessary for normal
operations.
|
(d)
|
The
categories of Capital Leases and Other Long-Term liabilities have
been
excluded from the table above because there are no applicable amounts
of
contractual obligations under these categories. Also, commitments
related
to pension and postretirement benefit plans have been excluded from
the
table above. The Company expects to make contributions to its qualified,
trusteed pension plans totaling $0.9 million during the remainder
of
fiscal year 2008. Laclede Gas anticipates a $0.3 million contribution
relative to its non-qualified pension plans during the remainder
of fiscal
year 2008. With regard to the postretirement benefits, the Company
anticipates Laclede Gas will contribute $8.2 million to the qualified
trusts and $0.3 million directly to participants from Laclede Gas’ funds
during the remainder of fiscal year 2008. For further discussion of
the Company’s pension and postretirement benefit plans, refer to Note 3,
Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits, of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
MARKET
RISK
Laclede
Gas adopted a risk management policy that provides for the purchase of natural
gas financial instruments with the goal of managing price risk associated with
purchasing natural gas on behalf of its customers. This policy prohibits
speculation. Costs and cost reductions, including carrying costs, associated
with the Utility’s use of natural gas financial instruments are allowed to be
passed on to the Utility’s customers through the operation of its PGA Clause,
through which the MoPSC allows the Utility to recover gas supply costs.
Accordingly, Laclede Gas does not expect any adverse earnings impact as a result
of the use of these financial instruments. At December 31, 2007, the
Utility held 21.5 million MMBtu of futures contracts at an average price of
$8.36 per MMBtu. These positions have various expiration dates, the longest
of
which extends through October 2008.
In
the course of its business, Laclede Group’s non-regulated gas marketing
affiliate, LER, enters into fixed price commitments associated with the purchase
or sale of natural gas. As part of LER’s risk management policy, LER manages the
price risk associated with these commitments by either closely matching the
offsetting physical purchase or sale of natural gas at fixed prices or through
the use of exchange-traded futures contracts to lock in margins. At
December 31, 2007, LER’s unmatched positions are not material to
Laclede Group’s financial position or results of operations.
ENVIRONMENTAL
MATTERS
Laclede
Gas owns and operates natural gas distribution, transmission and storage
facilities, the operations of which are subject to various environmental laws,
regulations and interpretations. While environmental issues resulting from
such
operations arise in the ordinary course of business, such issues have not
materially affected the Company’s or Laclede Gas’ financial position and results
of operations. As environmental laws, regulations, and their interpretations
change, however, Laclede Gas may be required to incur additional costs. For
information relative to environmental matters, see Note 14 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2007. There have been no significant changes
relative to environmental matters in the first quarter of fiscal
year 2008.
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Laclede
Group has no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Laclede
Gas Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition is
included in Exhibit 99.1 of this report.
28
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
For
this discussion, see the “Market Risk” subsection in Item 2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, page
28 of this report.
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
As
of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation,
under the supervision and with participation of our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of
the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to
Rule
13a-15e and Rule 15d-15e under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are
effective.
There
have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during our first fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or
are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
29
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
For
a description of environmental matters and legal proceedings, see Note 14 to
the
Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2007. For a description of pending
regulatory matters of Laclede Gas, see Item 2. Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Regulatory Matters,
on page 23 of this report.
Laclede
Group and its subsidiaries are involved in litigation, claims and investigations
arising in the normal course of business. While the results of such litigation
cannot be predicted with certainty, management, after discussion with counsel,
believes that the final outcome will not have a material adverse effect on
the
consolidated financial position or results of operations of the
Company.
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On
December 20, 2007, the Board of Directors of Laclede Gas approved the
sale of 30 shares of Laclede Gas common stock to Laclede Group. The proceeds
from the sale, totaling $1.0 million, were used to reduce short-term borrowings.
Exemption from registration was claimed under Section 4(2) of the Securities
Act
of 1933.
Item
6. Exhibits
(a)
|
See
Exhibit Index
|
30
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrants
have
duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.
The
Laclede Group, Inc.
|
|||||
|
|||||
Dated:
|
|
January
30, 2008
|
|
By:
|
/s/
Mark D. Waltermire
|
Mark
D. Waltermire
|
|||||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|||||
(Authorized
Signatory and Chief Financial
Officer)
|
31
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrants
have
duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.
Laclede
Gas Company
|
|||||
|
|||||
Dated:
|
|
January
30, 2008
|
|
By:
|
/s/
Mark D. Waltermire
|
Mark
D. Waltermire
|
|||||
Senior
Vice President and
|
|||||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|||||
(Authorized
Signatory and Chief Financial
Officer)
|
32
INDEX
TO
EXHIBITS
Exhibit
No.
|
|
|
10.1
|
-
|
Form
of Restricted Stock Award Agreement.
|
10.2
|
-
|
Form
of Performance Contingent Restricted Stock Award Agreement for all
participants except the Chief Executive Officer and the Executive
Vice
President – Energy and Administrative Services.
|
10.3
|
-
|
Forms
of Performance Contingent Restricted Stock Award Agreements for Chief
Executive Officer.
|
10.4
|
-
|
Form
of Performance Contingent Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Executive
Vice President – Energy and Administrative Services.
|
12
|
-
|
Ratio
of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
|
31
|
-
|
CEO
and CFO Certifications under Exchange Act Rule 13a – 14(a).
|
32
|
-
|
CEO
and CFO Section 1350 Certifications.
|
99.1
|
-
|
Laclede
Gas Company - Financial Statements, Notes to Financial Statements,
and
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
33