SPIRIT REALTY CAPITAL, INC. - Quarter Report: 2005 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005
Or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the transition period from _________
to _________
Commission file number 333-121094 (1933 Act)
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST II, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland | 20-1676382 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
2555 East Camelback Road, Suite 400 | (602) 778-8700 | |
Phoenix, Arizona 85016 | (Registrants telephone number, | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | including area code) |
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of November 10, 2005, there were 1,191,173 shares of common stock, par value $0.01, of Cole
Credit Property Trust II, Inc. outstanding.
Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST II, INC.
INDEX
INDEX
2
Table of Contents
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The information furnished in our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and condensed
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows reflects all
adjustments that are, in our opinion, necessary for a fair presentation of the aforementioned
financial statements.
The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the financial statements
and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained
in this report. The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, are not
necessarily indicative of the operating results expected for the full year. Condensed consolidated
results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, have not been
presented because Cole Credit Property Trust II, Inc. was in the development stage and did not have
any operations during that period.
3
Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST II, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004
(Unaudited)
As of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004
(Unaudited)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Real estate assets, at cost: |
||||||||
Land |
$ | 934,094 | $ | | ||||
Buildings and improvements, less accumulated depreciation
of $2,466 at September 30, 2005 |
2,046,509 | | ||||||
Intangible lease assets, less accumulated amortization of
$1,037 at September 30, 2005 |
368,299 | | ||||||
Total real estate assets |
3,348,902 | | ||||||
Cash |
4,772,471 | 200,000 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
1,363,506 | | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
107,584 | | ||||||
Deferred financing costs, less accumulated amortization of
$227 at September 30, 2005 |
46,202 | | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 9,638,665 | $ | 200,000 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Mortgage notes payable |
$ | 2,607,000 | $ | | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
14,678 | | ||||||
Due to affiliates |
80,438 | | ||||||
Escrowed investor proceeds liability |
1,363,506 | | ||||||
Total liabilities |
4,065,622 | | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred Stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares
authorized, none issued and outstanding
at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value, 90,000,000 shares authorized,
620,216 and 20,000 shares issued and outstanding at
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively |
6,202 | 200 | ||||||
Capital in excess of par value |
5,596,384 | 199,800 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(29,543 | ) | | |||||
Total stockholders equity |
5,573,043 | 200,000 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 9,638,665 | $ | 200,000 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST II, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||
September 30, 2005 | September 30, 2005 | |||||||
REVENUE: |
||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 2,761 | $ | 2,761 | ||||
EXPENSES: |
||||||||
Depreciation & amortization |
3,504 | 3,504 | ||||||
Interest expense |
1,864 | 1,864 | ||||||
General and administrative expenses |
26,936 | 26,936 | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
32,304 | 32,304 | ||||||
NET LOSS |
$ | (29,543 | ) | $ | (29,543 | ) | ||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON
SHARES OUTSTANDING |
||||||||
Basic and diluted |
64,467 | 34,822 | ||||||
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE |
||||||||
Basic and Diluted |
$ | (0.46 | ) | $ | (0.85 | ) | ||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST II, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
For the Period September 29, 2004 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2004
and for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005
(Unaudited)
For the Period September 29, 2004 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2004
and for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005
(Unaudited)
Common Stock | ||||||||||||||||||||
Capital in | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Par | Excess of | Accumulated | Stockholders | ||||||||||||||||
Shares | Value | Par Value | Deficit | Equity | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 29, 2004 (Date
of Inception) |
| $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||||||||
Issuance of common stock to
Cole Holdings Corporation |
20,000 | 200 | 199,800 | | $ | 200,000 | ||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
20,000 | 200 | 199,800 | | 200,000 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock |
600,216 | 6,002 | 5,982,424 | | 5,988,426 | |||||||||||||||
Commission on stock sales and
related dealer manager fees |
(496,445 | ) | (496,445 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other offering costs |
(89,395 | ) | (89,395 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
(29,543 | ) | (29,543 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 30, 2005 |
620,216 | $ | 6,202 | $ | 5,596,384 | $ | (29,543 | ) | $ | 5,573,043 | ||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST II, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005
and for the Period September 29, 2004 (date of inception) to September 30, 2004
(Unaudited)
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005
and for the Period September 29, 2004 (date of inception) to September 30, 2004
(Unaudited)
Period | ||||||||
September 29, 2004 (date | ||||||||
Nine Months Ended | of inception) to | |||||||
September 30, 2005 | September 30, 2004 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (29,543 | ) | $ | | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
|
||||||||
Depreciation |
2,466 | | ||||||
Amortization |
1,264 | | ||||||
Changes in
assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
14,678 | | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
(7,584 | ) | | |||||
Due to affiliates |
13,268 | |||||||
Total adjustments |
24,092 | | ||||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(5,451 | ) | | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Investment in real estate and related assets |
(3,352,405 | ) | | |||||
Escrow deposit on property to be acquired |
(50,000 | ) | | |||||
Restricted cash |
(1,363,506 | ) | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(4,765,911 | ) | | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
5,988,426 | 200,000 | ||||||
Proceeds from mortgage notes payable |
2,607,000 | | ||||||
Escrowed investor proceed liability |
1,363,506 | | ||||||
Offering costs on issuance of common stock |
(568,670 | ) | | |||||
Deferred financing costs paid |
(46,429 | ) | | |||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
9,343,833 | | ||||||
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS: |
4,572,471 | 200,000 | ||||||
CASH Beginning of period |
200,000 | | ||||||
CASH End of period |
$ | 4,772,471 | $ | 200,000 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF INVESTING AND
FINANCING NON-CASH ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Escrow deposit due to affiliate |
$ | 50,000 | $ | | ||||
Other offering costs due to affiliate |
$ | 17,170 | $ | | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST II, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2005
(Unuaudited)
September 30, 2005
(Unuaudited)
Note 1 Organization
Cole Credit Property Trust II, Inc. (the Company) was formed on September 29, 2004 and is a
Maryland corporation that intends to qualify as a real estate investment trust (REIT) beginning
with the taxable year ending December 31, 2005. Substantially all of the Companys business is
conducted through Cole Operating Partnership II, LP (Cole OP II), a Delaware limited partnership.
The Company is the sole general partner of and owns a 99.9% partnership interest in Cole OP II.
Cole REIT Advisors II, LLC (the Advisor), the affiliated advisor to the Company, is the sole
limited partner and owner of 0.1% of the partnership interests of Cole OP II.
Pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-11 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
Registration Statement), the Company is offering for sale to the public on a best efforts basis
a minimum of 250,000 and a maximum of 45,000,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $10 per
share, subject to discounts in certain circumstances, (the Offering) and up to 5,000,000
additional shares pursuant to a distribution reinvestment plan under which its stockholders may
elect to have distributions reinvested in additional shares of the Companys common stock at $9.15
per share. The Registration Statement was declared effective on June 27, 2005.
On September 23, 2005, the Company issued the initial 486,000 shares under the Offering and
commenced its principal operations. Prior to such date, the Company was considered a development
stage company. As of September 30, 2005, the Company had issued approximately 600,000 shares of
its common stock in the Offering for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $6.0 million before
offering costs and selling commissions of approximately $586,000. As disclosed in the Registration
Statement, the Company expects to use substantially all of the net proceeds from the Offering to
acquire and operate commercial real estate primarily consisting of high quality, freestanding,
single-tenant commercial properties net-leased to investment grade and other creditworthy tenants
located throughout the United States.
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance
with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X, and do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the statements for the
unaudited interim period presented include all adjustments, which are of a normal and recurring
nature, necessary to present a fair presentation of the results for such period. Results for this
interim period are not necessarily indicative of full year results. Consolidated results of
operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 have not been presented because
the Company was in the development stage and did not have any operations during that period.
Principles of Consolidation
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
controlled subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America necessarily requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Real Estate Assets
Real estate assets are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Amounts capitalized to real
estate assets consist of the cost of acquisition or construction and any tenant improvements or
major improvements and betterments that extend the useful life of the related asset. All repairs
and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
8
Table of Contents
The Company is required to make subjective assessments as to the useful lives of its depreciable
assets. The Company will consider the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the
appropriate useful lives. These assessments have a direct impact on net income. All assets are
depreciated on a straight line basis. The estimate useful lives of our assets by class are
generally as follows:
Building
|
40 years | |
Property acquisition costs
|
40 years | |
Tenant improvements
|
Lease term | |
Intangible lease assets
|
Lease term |
Impairment losses are recorded on long-lived assets used in operations, which includes the
operating property, when indicators of impairment are present and the assets carrying amount is
greater than the sum of the future undiscounted cash flows, excluding interest, estimated to be
generated by those assets. As of September 30, 2005, no indicators of impairment existed and no
losses had been recorded.
Allocation of Purchase Price of Acquired Assets
Upon the acquisition of real properties, the Company allocates the purchase price of such
properties to acquired tangible assets, consisting of land and building, and identified intangible
assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases and the
value of in-place leases, based in each case on their fair values.
The Company utilizes independent appraisals to determine the fair values of the tangible assets of
an acquired property (which includes land and building). Factors considered by management in
performing these analyses include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up
periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases, including
leasing commissions and other related costs. In estimating carrying costs, management includes
real estate taxes, insurance, and other operating expenses during the expected lease-up periods
based on current market demand.
The fair values of above-market and below-market in-place leases are recorded based on the present
value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the
differences between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii)
estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, which is generally
obtained from independent appraisals, measured over a period equal to the remaining terms of the
leases. The capitalized above-market and below-market lease values are recorded as intangible
lease assets or liabilities and amortized as an adjustment to rental income over the remaining
terms of the leases.
The fair values of in-place leases include direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant,
opportunity costs associated with lost rentals which are avoided by acquiring an in-place lease,
and tenant relationships. Direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant include commissions,
tenant improvements and other direct costs and are estimated based on independent appraisals and
managements consideration of current market costs to execute a similar lease. These direct costs
are included in intangible lease assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are
amortized to expense over the remaining terms of the respective leases. The value of opportunity
costs is calculated using the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases over a
market absorption period for a similar lease. Customer relationships are valued based on expected
renewal of a lease or the likelihood of obtaining a particular tenant for other locations. These
lease intangibles are included in intangible lease assets in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets and are amortized to rental income over the remaining term of the respective leases.
Intangible Lease Assets
Intangible lease assets consist of the fair value of the in-place lease associated with the real
estate acquisition (see Note 3). The weighted average life of the in-place lease is fifteen years.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, approximately $1,000 in amortization of
intangible lease assets was recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with maturities when purchased of three months
or less to be cash equivalents.
9
Table of Contents
Restricted Cash and Escrowed Investor Proceeds
The Company is currently engaged in a public offering of its common stock. Included in restricted
cash and escrowed investor proceeds is approximately $1.3 million of offering proceeds for which
shares of common stock have not been issued as of September 30, 2005.
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of
the related financing arrangement. Amortization of deferred financing costs for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2005 was $227 and was recorded in interest expense in the condensed
consolidated statements of operations.
Deferred Lease Costs
Costs incurred to procure operating leases, including those identified as part of the purchase
price allocations process, are capitalized as deferred lease costs and amortized on a straight-line
basis over the terms of the related leases.
Revenue Recognition
Upon the acquisition of real estate, certain properties have leases that provide for tenant
occupancy during periods for which no rent is due or where minimum rent payments increase during
the term of the lease. The Company will record rental revenue for the full term of each lease on a
straight-line basis. Accordingly, the Company will record a receivable from tenants that the
Company expects to collect over the remaining lease term rather than currently, which will be
recorded as deferred rents receivable. When the Company acquires a property, the term of existing
leases is considered to commence as of the acquisition date for the purposes of this calculation.
Income Taxes
The Company intends to make an election to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the
Internal Revenue Code commencing with its taxable year ending December 31, 2005. If the Company
qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal corporate
income tax to the extent it distributes its REIT taxable income to its stockholders, and so long as
it distributes at least 90% of its REIT taxable income. REITs are subject to a number of other
organizational and operational requirements. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT,
it may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property, and federal income
and excise taxes on its undistributed income.
Concentration of Credit Risk
At September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the Company had cash on deposit in one financial
institution in excess of federally insured levels; however, the Company has not experienced any
losses in such account. The Company limits investment of cash investments to financial
institutions with high credit standing; therefore, the Company believes it is not exposed to any
significant credit risk on cash.
Offering and Related Costs
The Advisor funds all of the organization and offering costs on the Companys behalf and may be
reimbursed for such costs up to 1.5% of the cumulative capital raised by the Company in the
Offering. As of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the Advisor had incurred organization
and offering costs of approximately $881,000 and $463,000, respectively, on behalf of the Company.
Of these amounts, the Company was responsible for approximately $90,000 and $0 at September 30,
2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. The offering costs, which include items such as legal
and accounting fees, marketing, and promotional printing costs, are recorded as a reduction of
capital in excess of par value along with sales commissions and dealer manager fees of 7% and 1.5%,
respectively. Organization costs are expensed as incurred.
Due to affiliates
Due to affiliates consists of approximately $17,000 due to our Advisor for reimbursement of
organizational and offering costs (see Note 6) and approximately $50,000 due to an affiliate of our
Advisor for reimbursement of a property escrow deposit.
10
Table of Contents
Stockholders Equity
At September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the Company was authorized to issue 90,000,000 shares
of common stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. All shares of such stock have a par
value of $.01 per share. The Companys board of directors may authorize additional shares of
capital stock and amend their terms without obtaining stockholder approval.
The par value of investor proceeds raised from the Offering is classified as common stock, with the
remainder allocated to capital in excess of par value. The Companys share redemption program
provides that all redemptions during any calendar year, including those upon death or qualifying
disability, are limited to those that can be funded with proceeds raised from the Companys
distribution reinvestment plan. In accordance with Accounting Series Release No. 268,
Presentation in Financial Statements of Redeemable Preferred Stock, the Company will account for
the proceeds received from its distribution reinvestment plan as temporary equity for future
redemption of shares.
Earnings Per Share
Earnings per share are calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
during each period. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding is identical for
basic and fully diluted earnings per share. The effect of the outstanding stock options was
anti-dilutive to earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005.
Stock Options
As permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, and SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and
Disclosure, the Company elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations in accounting for its stock
options under the Independent Directors Stock Option Plan (IDSOP) (see Note 8). Under APB No.
25, compensation expense is recorded when the exercise price of stock options is less than the fair
value of the underlying stock on the date of grant. The Company has implemented the
disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 148. As of September 30, 2005, there were
10,000 stock options outstanding under the IDSOP at an average exercise price of $9.15 per share.
If the Company elected to adopt the expense recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, the impact on
net loss would have been an additional approximately $15,000 of general and administrative expenses
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, or additional loss of $0.24 and $0.44 per
dilutive share, respectively.
Segments
The Company internally evaluates all of the properties owned as one industry segment and,
accordingly, does not report segment information.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
SFAS No. 123R, Share Based Payment, is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005.
The Company will be required to adopt the new standard on January 1, 2006. This statement requires
companies to expense the value of employee stock options and similar awards. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of the standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In July 2005, the FASB issued Staff Position (FSP) Statement of Position (SOP) 78-9-1,
Interaction of American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) SOP 78-9 and Emerging
Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 04-5. The EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 04-5,
Determining Whether a General Partner or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited
Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights stating that a general
partner is presumed to control a limited partnership and should consolidate the limited partnership
unless the limited partners possess substantive kick-out rights or the limited partners possess
substantive participating rights. This FSP eliminates the concept of important rights of SOP
78-9 and replaces it with the concepts of kick-out rights and substantive participating rights
as defined in Issue 04-5. This EITF and FSP are effective after June 29, 2005 for general partners
of all new partnerships formed and for existing partnerships for which the partnership agreements
are modified. For general partners in all other partnerships, this guidance is effective no later
than January 1, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this FSP on its financial
statements.
11
Table of Contents
Note 3 Real Estate Assets
Acquisitions
Tractor Supply Parkersburg, WV
On September 26, 2005, the Company acquired an approximately 22,000 square foot single-tenant
retail building, which was constructed in 2005 on an approximately 2.97 acre site in Parkersburg,
West Virginia (the TS Parkersburg Property). The purchase price of the TS Parkersburg Property
was approximately $3.3 million, exclusive of closing costs. The acquisition was funded by net
proceeds from the Offering and an approximately $2.6 million loan secured by the TS
Parkersburg Property (see Note 4 for a description of the loan). In connection with the
acquisition, the Company paid an affiliate of its Advisor an acquisition fee of approximately
$65,000 and its Advisor a finance coordination fee of approximately $18,000. The TS Parkersburg
Property is 100% leased to Tractor Supply Company (Tractor Supply). The results of operations
from this acquired property are included in the Companys results of operation from the date of
acquisition through September 30, 2005.
Assuming the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2005, pro forma revenue, net loss and net loss
per diluted share would have been approximately $63,000, $27,000, and $0.41, respectively, for the
three months ended September 30, 2005 and $189,000, $2,000, and $0.06, respectively, for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005. The pro forma results for the
nine months ended September 30, 2005, assume the repayment of
approximately $0.8 million of the approximately
$2.6 million loan after three months, in accordance with the
terms of the loan (see Note 4). The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the
operating results that would have been obtained had the acquisition occurred at the beginning of
the periods presented, nor are they necessarily indicative of future operating results.
Note 4 Borrowings
Tractor Supply Parkersburg, WV
On September 26, 2005, in connection with the acquisition of the TS Parkersburg Property, the
Company entered into an approximately $2.6 million loan (the TS Parkersburg Loan) from Wachovia
Bank National Association (the Lender). The TS Parkersburg Loan, which is secured by the TS
Parkersburg Property, consists of an approximately $1.8 million fixed interest rate tranche (the
TS Parkersburg Fixed Rate Tranche) and an approximately $0.8 million variable interest rate
tranche (the TS Parkersburg Variable Rate Tranche). The TS Parkersburg Fixed Rate Tranche has a
fixed interest rate of 5.57% per annum with monthly interest only payments and the outstanding
principal and interest due on October 11, 2015. The TS Parkersburg Variable Rate Tranche has a
variable interest rate based on the one-month LIBOR rate plus 200 basis points with monthly
interest only payments and the outstanding principal and interest due on December 26, 2005.
Note 5 Commitments and Contingencies
On September 28, 2005, the Company entered into a purchase agreement relating to a single-tenant
retail building located in Brainerd, Minnesota. See Note 9 for details of the acquisition.
Note 6 Related-Party Transactions and Arrangements
Certain affiliates of the Company will receive fees and compensation in connection with the
Offering, and the acquisition, management and sale of the assets of the Company. Cole Capital
Corporation (Cole Capital), the affiliated dealer-manager, will receive a selling commission of
up to 7% of gross offering proceeds before reallowance of commissions earned by participating
broker-dealers. Cole Capital intends to reallow 100% of commissions earned to participating
broker-dealers. In addition, Cole Capital will receive up to 1.5% of gross proceeds, before
reallowance to participating broker-dealers, as a dealer-manager fee. Cole Capital, in its sole
discretion, may reallow all or a portion of its dealer-manager fee to such participating
broker-dealers as a marketing and due diligence expense reimbursement, based on such factors as the
volume of shares sold by such participating broker-dealers and marketing support incurred as
compared to those of other participating broker-dealers. During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2005, the Company paid approximately $497,000 to Cole Capital for commissions and
dealer manager fees, of which approximately $413,000 was reallowed to participating broker-dealers.
All organization and offering expenses (excluding selling commissions and the dealer-manager fee)
are being paid for by the Advisor or its affiliates and will be reimbursed by the Company up to
1.5% of gross offering proceeds. The Advisor or its affiliates also will receive acquisition and
advisory fees of up to 2% of the contract purchase price of each asset for the acquisition,
development or construction of real property and will be reimbursed for acquisition costs incurred
in the process of acquiring properties, but not to exceed 2.0% of the contract purchase price. The
Company expects the acquisition expenses to be approximately 0.5% of the purchase price of each
property. During the three and nine months ended
12
Table of Contents
September 30, 2005, the Company reimbursed the Advisor approximately $90,000 for organizational and
offering expenses and paid approximately $65,000 for acquisition fees.
If the Advisor provides services, as determined by the independent directors, in connection with
the origination or refinancing of any debt financing obtained by the Company that is used to
acquire properties or to make other permitted investments, the Company will pay the Advisor a
financing coordination fee equal to 1% of the amount available under such financing; provided,
however, that the Advisor shall not be entitled to a financing coordination fee in connection with
the refinancing of any loan secured by any particular property that was previously subject to a
refinancing in which the Advisor received such a fee. Financing coordination fees payable from
loan proceeds from permanent financing will be paid to the Advisor as the Company acquires such
permanent financing. However, no acquisition fees will be paid on loan proceeds from any line of
credit until such time as all net offering proceeds have been invested by the Company. During the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, the Company paid the Advisor approximately $18,000
for finance coordination fees.
The Company expects to pay Fund Realty Advisors, Inc. (Fund Realty), its affiliated property
manager, fees for the management and leasing of the Companys properties. Such fees are expected
to equal 2% of gross revenues, plus leasing commissions at prevailing market rates; provided
however, that the aggregate of all property management and leasing fees paid to affiliates plus all
payments to third parties will not exceed the amount that other nonaffiliated management and
leasing companies generally charge for similar services in the same geographic location. Fund
Realty may subcontract its duties for a fee that may be less than the fee provided for in the
property management agreement. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, the
Company did not pay any property management fees to Fund Realty.
The Company will pay the Advisor an annualized asset management fee of 0.25% of the aggregate asset
value of the Companys assets (the Asset Management Fee). The fee will be payable monthly in an
amount equal to 0.02083% of aggregate asset value as of the last day of the immediately preceding
month. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, the Company did not pay any
asset management fees to the Advisor.
If the Advisor or its affiliates provides a substantial amount of services, as determined by the
Companys independent directors, in connection with the sale of one or more properties, the Company
will pay the Advisor up to one-half of the brokerage commission paid, but in no event to exceed an
amount equal to 2% of the sales price of each property sold. In no event will the combined real
estate commission paid to the Advisor, its affiliates and unaffiliated third parties exceed 6% of
the contract sales price. In addition, after investors have received a return of their net capital
contributions and an 8% annual cumulative, non-compounded return, then the Advisor is entitled to
receive 10% of remaining net sale proceeds. During the three and nine months ended September 30,
2005, the Company did not pay any fees or amounts to the Advisor relating to the sale of
properties.
Upon listing of the Companys common stock on a national securities exchange or included for
quotation on The Nasdaq National Market, a fee equal to 10% of the amount by which the market value
of the Companys outstanding stock plus all distributions paid by the Company prior to listing,
exceeds the sum of the total amount of capital raised from investors and the amount of cash flow
necessary to generate an 8% annual cumulative, non-compounded return to investors will be paid to
the Advisor (the Subordinated Incentive Listing Fee).
Upon termination of the advisory agreement with the Advisor, other than termination by the Company
because of a material breach of the advisory agreement by the Advisor, a performance fee of 10% of
the amount, if any, by which (i) the appraised asset value at the time of such termination plus
total distributions paid to stockholders through the termination date exceeds (ii) the aggregate
capital contribution contributed by investors less distributions from sale proceeds plus payment to
investors of an 8% annual, cumulative, non-compounded return on capital. No subordinated
performance fee will be paid if the Company has already paid or become obligated to pay the Advisor
a Subordinated Incentive Listing Fee.
The Company will reimburse the Advisor for all expenses it paid or incurred in connection with the
services provided to the Company, subject to the limitation that the Company will not reimburse for
any amount by which its operating expenses (including the Asset Management Fee) at the end of the
four preceding fiscal quarters exceeds the greater of (i) 2% of average invested assets, or (ii)
25% of net income other than any additions to reserves for depreciation, bad debts or other similar
non-cash reserves and excluding any gain from the sale of assets for that period. The Company will
not reimburse for personnel costs in connection with services for which the Advisor receives
acquisition fees or real estate commissions. During the three and nine months ended September 30,
2005, the Company did not reimburse the Advisor for any such costs.
13
Table of Contents
Note 7 Economic Dependency
Under various agreements, the Company has engaged or will engage the Advisor and its affiliates to
provide certain services that are essential to the Company, including asset management services,
supervision of the management and leasing of properties owned by the Company, asset acquisition and
disposition decisions, the sale of shares of the Companys common stock available for issue, as
well as other administrative responsibilities for the Company including accounting services and
investor relations. As a result of these relationships, the Company is dependent upon the Advisor
and its affiliates. In the event that these companies were unable to provide the Company with the
respective services, the Company would be required to find alternative providers of these services.
Note 8 Independent Directors Stock Option Plan
The Company has a stock option plan, the IDSOP, which authorizes the grant of non-qualified stock
options to the Companys independent directors, subject to the absolute discretion of the board and
the applicable limitations of the plan. The Company intends to grant options under the IDSOP to
each qualifying director annually. The exercise price for the options granted under the IDSOP
initially will be $9.15 per share (or greater, if such higher price as is necessary so that such
options shall not be considered a nonqualified deferred compensation plan under Section 409A of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended). It is intended that the exercise price for future
options granted under the IDSOP will be at least 100.0% of the fair market value of the Companys
common stock as of the date that the option is granted. As of September 30, 2005 and December 31,
2004, the Company had granted options to purchase 10,000 and 0 shares, respectively, at $9.15 per
share. A total of 1,000,000 shares have been authorized and reserved for issuance under the IDSOP.
Note 9 Subsequent Events
Sale of Shares of Common Stock
As of November 10, 2005, the Company raised approximately $10.2 million through the issuance of
approximately 1.2 million shares of its common stock under the Offering. As of November 10, 2005,
approximately $438.1 million (43.8 million shares) remained available for sale to the public under
the offering, exclusive of shares available under the Companys distribution reinvestment plan.
Property Acquisitions
Walgreens Brainerd, MN
On
October 6, 2005 the Company acquired an approximately 15,000 square foot single-tenant retail
building located in Brainerd, Minnesota, which was constructed in 2000 on an approximately 2.07
acre site (the WG Brainerd Property). The WG Brainerd Property is 100% leased to Walgreen Co.
The purchase price of the WG Brainerd Property was approximately $4.3 million, exclusive of closing
costs. The acquisition was funded by net proceeds from the Offering and an approximately $3.5
million loan secured by the WG Brainerd Property (see below under borrowings for a description of
the loan). In connection with the acquisition, the Company paid an affiliate of the Advisor an
acquisition fee of approximately $87,000 and its Advisor a finance coordination fee of
approximately $28,000.
Rite Aid Alliance, OH
On October 20, 2005 the Company acquired an approximately 11,000 square foot single-tenant retail
building, which was constructed in 1996 on an approximately 1.79 acre site located in Alliance,
Ohio (the RA Alliance Property). The purchase price of the RA Alliance Property was $2.1
million, exclusive of closing costs. The acquisition was funded by net proceeds from the Offering.
In connection with the acquisition, the Company paid an affiliate of its Advisor an acquisition
fee of $42,000. The RA Alliance Property is 100% leased to RA Ohio, a subsidiary of Rite Aid
Corporation (Rite Aid), which guarantees the lease.
La-Z-Boy Glendale, AZ
On October 25, 2005 the Company acquired a 23,000 square foot single-tenant retail building located
in Glendale, Arizona, which was constructed in 2001 on an approximately 3.18 acre site (the LZ
Glendale Property). The purchase price of the LZ Glendale Property was approximately $5.7
million, exclusive of closing costs. The acquisition was funded by net proceeds from the Offering
and an approximately $4.6 million loan secured by the LZ Glendale Property (see below under
borrowings for a description of the loan). In connection with the acquisition, the Company paid an
affiliate of its Advisor an acquisition fee of approximately $114,000 and its Advisor a finance
coordination fee of approximately $34,000. Concurrent with the acquisition of the LZ Glendale
Property on October 25, 2005, the Company entered into a new lease with EBCO,
14
Table of Contents
Inc., which is an affiliate of the seller, for 100% of the property.
Walgreens Portfolio Missouri
On November 2, 2005, the Company acquired interest in (i) a 15,120 square foot single-tenant
retail building on an approximately 2.11 acre site located in St. Louis, Missouri (ii) a 15,120
square foot single-tenant retail building on an approximately 2.13 acre site located in St. Louis,
Missouri and (iii) a 15,120 square foot single-tenant retail building on an approximately 1.82 acre
site located in Florissant, Missouri (collectively, the WG SL Properties) for a gross purchase
price of approximately $16.4 million, exclusive of closing costs. The WG SL Properties each were
constructed in 2001 and are 100% leased to Walgreen Co. The acquisition was funded by net proceeds
from the Offering and an approximately $13.1 million loan secured by the WG SL Properties (see
below under borrowings for a description of the loan). In connection with the acquisition, the
Company paid an affiliate of its Advisor an acquisition fee of $246,000 and its Advisor a finance
coordination fee of approximately $106,000.
Borrowings
Walgreens Brainerd, MN
On October 5, 2005, in connection with the acquisition of the WG Brainerd Property, the Company
obtained an approximately $3.5 million loan from the Lender by executing a promissory note (the WG
Brainerd Loan). The WG Brainerd Loan, which is secured by the WG Brainerd Property, consists of an
approximately $2.8 million fixed interest rate tranche (the WG Brainerd Fixed Rate Tranche) and
an approximately $649,000 variable interest rate tranche (the WG Brainerd Variable Rate Tranche).
The WG Brainerd Fixed Rate Tranche has a fixed interest rate of 5.44% per annum with monthly
interest-only payments and the outstanding principal and interest due on October 11, 2015. The WG
Brainerd Variable Rate Tranche has a variable interest rate based on the one-month LIBOR rate plus
200 basis points with monthly interest-only payments and the outstanding principal and interest due
on January 4, 2006.
La-Z-Boy Glendale, AZ
On October 25, 2005, in connection with the acquisition of the LZ Glendale Property, the Company
obtained an approximately $4.6 million loan from the Lender by executing a promissory note (the LZ
Glendale Loan). The LZ Glendale Loan, which is secured by the LZ Glendale Property, consists of an
approximately $3.4 million fixed interest rate tranche (the LZ Glendale Fixed Rate Tranche) and
an approximately $1.1 million variable interest rate tranche (the LZ Glendale Variable Rate
Tranche). The LZ Glendale Fixed Rate Tranche has a fixed interest rate of 5.76% per annum with
monthly interest-only payments and the outstanding principal and interest due on November 11, 2010.
The LZ Glendale Variable Rate Tranche has a variable interest rate based on the one-month LIBOR
rate plus 200 basis points with monthly interest-only payments and the outstanding principal and
interest due on January 25, 2006.
Walgreens Portfolio Missouri
On November 2, 2005, in connection with the acquisition of the WG SL Properties, the Company
obtained an approximately $13.12 million loan from the Lender by executing a promissory note (the
WG SL Loan). The WG SL Loan, which is secured by the WG SL Properties, consists of an
approximately $10.66 million fixed interest rate tranche (the WG SL Fixed Rate Tranche) and an
approximately $2.46 million variable interest rate tranche (the WG SL Variable Rate Tranche).
The WG SL Fixed Rate Tranche has a fixed interest rate of 5.48% per annum with monthly
interest-only payments and the outstanding principal and interest due on November 11, 2015. The WG
SL Variable Rate Tranche has a variable interest rate based on the one-month LIBOR rate plus 200
basis points with monthly interest-only payments and the outstanding principal and interest due on
February 2, 2006.
Declaration of Distributions
On October 4, 2005, the Companys board of directors declared a distribution of $0.05 per share for
stockholders of record on each of October 7, 2005, November 7, 2005 and December 7, 2005. The
payment date for each of the distributions will be January 3, 2006. The monthly distributions are
calculated to be equivalent to an annualized distribution of six percent (6%) per share, assuming a
purchase price of $10.00 per share.
15
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
Forward-Looking Statements
This section contains forward-looking statements, including discussion and analysis of the
financial condition of us and our subsidiary, our anticipated capital expenditures required to
commence operations, amounts of anticipated cash distributions to our stockholders in the future
and other matters. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts but are the intent,
belief or current expectations of our management based on their knowledge and understanding of our
business and industry. Words such as may, will, anticipates, expects, intends, plans,
believes, seeks, estimates, would, could, should and variations of these words and
similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not
guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of
which are beyond our control, are difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ
materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements that were true at the time made may ultimately prove to be incorrect or
false. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which
reflect our managements view only as of the date of this
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q. We
undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed
assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results. Factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements made in
the Form 10-Q include changes in general economic conditions, changes in real estate conditions,
construction costs that may exceed estimates, construction delays, increases in interest rates,
lease-up risks, inability to obtain new tenants upon the expiration of existing leases, and the
potential need to fund tenant improvements or other capital expenditures out of operating cash
flows. The forward-looking statements should be read in light of the risk factors identified in the
Risk Factors section of the Registration Statement, relating to the Offering, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based
upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial
statements requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities. On a regular basis, we evaluate these estimates. These estimates are based on
managements historical industry experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to
be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Results of Operations
We commenced our principal operations on September 23, 2005, when we issued the initial 486,000
shares in the Offering. Prior to such date, we were considered a development stage company.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2005, we purchased a single-tenant, freestanding retail
building 100% leased to Tractor Supply located in Parkersburg, West Virginia (see Notes 3 and 4 to
the condensed consolidated financial statements accompanying this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q).
Because we did not commence operations until the third quarter of 2005, comparative financial data
is not presented for the prior fiscal year.
Our management is not aware of any material trends or uncertainties, other than national economic
conditions affecting real estate generally (such as lower capitalization rates, which lead to lower
rents), that may reasonably be expected to have a material impact, favorable or unfavorable, on
revenues or income from the acquisition and operations of real properties and mortgage loans, other
than those referred to in our Registration Statement.
As of September 30, 2005, our real estate property was 100% leased. Our results of operations are
not indicative of those expected in future periods as we expect that rental income, depreciation
expense, operating expenses, asset management fees and net income will each increase in the future
as we acquire additional properties.
Rental income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 totaled approximately $2,800.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, property operating expenses were
approximately $1,900, and depreciation and amortization expenses were approximately $3,500. We
acquired our first property on September 26, 2005, which offered five days of revenues and expenses
for the quarter ended September 30, 2005.
General and administrative expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 totaled
approximately $27,000, primarily relating to fees paid to our independent directors and other
organization costs. We sustained a net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005
of approximately $30,000, primarily as a result of incurring overhead-related
16
Table of Contents
general and administrative expenses and interest expense without sufficient rental revenues from
properties to cover the costs. Loss per share for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2005 was $0.47 and $0.86, respectively. With the acquisition of new properties in future periods,
we anticipate that general and administrative expenses, net income, and earnings per share will
increase. However, we expect general and administrative expenses to decrease as a percentage of
total revenue.
Our property acquisition was financed with debt of approximately $2.6 million. During the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2005, we incurred amortization of deferred financing costs and
interest expense of approximately $1,900 related to our use of this debt. Our debt financing costs
in future periods will vary based on our level of future borrowings, which will depend on the level
of investor proceeds raised, the cost of borrowings, and the opportunity to acquire real estate
assets fitting our investment objectives.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
We expect to continue to raise capital through our ongoing Offering of common stock and to utilize
such funds and proceeds from secured or unsecured financings to complete future property
acquisitions. As of September 30, 2005, we had raised approximately $6.0 million in the Offering.
We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements through net cash provided by property
operations and proceeds from the Offering. Operating cash flows are expected to increase as
additional properties are added to our portfolio. The offering and organizational costs associated
with the Offering are initially paid by our Advisor, which will be reimbursed for such costs up to
1.5% of the capital raised by us in the Offering. As of September 30, 2005, our Advisor has paid
approximately $881,000 of offering and organization costs and we have reimbursed the advisor for
approximately $90,000 of such costs.
Subsequent to September 30, 2005, we completed the acquisition of six single-tenant retail
buildings in separate transactions for an aggregate purchase price of $28.5 million, exclusive of
closing costs. The acquisitions were funded with proceeds from the Offering and approximately
$21.2 million in aggregate proceeds from three loans.
On October 4, 2005, our board of directors declared a distribution of $0.05 per share for
stockholders of record on each of October 7, 2005, November 7, 2005 and December 7, 2005. The
payment date for each of the distributions will be January 3, 2006. The monthly distributions are
calculated to be equivalent to an annualized distribution of six percent (6%) per share, assuming a
purchase price of $10.00 per share.
On a long-term basis, our principal demands for funds will be for property acquisitions, either
directly or through investment interests, for the payment of operating expenses and distributions
and for the payment of interest on our outstanding indebtedness and other investments. Generally,
cash needs for items other than property acquisitions will be met from operations and property
acquisitions from funding by public offerings of our shares.
Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities was approximately $5,000 for the nine months ended September
30, 2005, primarily due to a net loss for the period of approximately $30,000 due to our initial
property acquisition, the TS Parkersburg Property, occurring on September 26, 2005. See Results
of Operations for a more complete discussion of the factors impacting our operating performance.
Investing and Financing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was approximately $4.8 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005, primarily due to approximately $3.4 million used on the acquisition of the TS
Parkersburg Property and the associated acquisition costs and approximately $1.3 million in
restricted cash, which is held in escrow pending issuance of shares to investors.
Net cash provided by financing activities was approximately $9.3 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005, primarily due to net proceeds from the issuance of common stock under the
Offering of approximately $5.4 million, net proceeds from the issuance of a mortgage note in
connection with the acquisition of the TS Parkersburg Property of approximately $2.6 million and an
approximately $1.3 million liability related to investor proceeds, which are held in escrow pending
issuance of shares to the investors .
17
Table of Contents
Election as a REIT
We intend to make an election to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal
Revenue Code commencing with its taxable year ending December 31, 2005. If we qualify for taxation
as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal corporate income tax to the extent we
distribute our REIT taxable income to our stockholders, and so long as we distribute at least 90%
of our REIT taxable income. REITs are subject to a number of other organizational and operational
requirements. Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state and
local taxes on our income and property, and federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed
income.
Inflation
The real estate market has not been affected significantly by inflation in the past several years
due to the relatively low inflation rate. However, in the event inflation does become a factor,
the leases on the real estate we may acquire may not include provisions that would protect us from
the impact of inflation.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our accounting policies have been established in to conform to accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with GAAP requires us to use judgment in the application of accounting policies,
including making estimates and assumptions. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. If our
judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to the various transactions had
been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied, thus,
resulting in a different presentation of the financial statements. Additionally, other companies
may utilize different estimates that may impact comparability of our results of operations to those
of companies in similar businesses.
The following discussion pertains to accounting policies management believes are most critical to
the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations which require managements most
difficult, subjective or complex judgments. These judgments often result from the need to make
estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. This discussion addresses
judgments known to management pertaining to trends, events or uncertainties which were taken into
consideration upon the application of those policies and the likelihood that materially different
amounts would be reported upon taking into consideration different conditions and assumptions.
Real Estate Assets
Real estate assets are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Amounts capitalized to real
estate assets consist of the cost of acquisition or construction and any tenant improvements or
major improvements and betterments that extend the useful life of the related asset. All repairs
and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
We are required to make subjective assessments as to the useful lives of our depreciable assets.
We will consider the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful
lives. These assessments have a direct impact on net income. All assets are depreciated on a
straight line basis. The estimate useful lives of our assets by class are generally as follows:
Building
|
40 years | ||
Property acquisition costs
|
40 years | ||
Tenant improvements
|
Lease term | ||
Intangible lease assets
|
Lease term |
Impairment losses are recorded on long-lived assets used in operations, which includes the
operating property, when indicators of impairment are present and the assets carrying amount is
greater than the sum of the future undiscounted cash flows, excluding interest, estimated to be
generated by those assets. As of September 30, 2005, no indicators of impairment existed and no
losses had been recorded.
18
Table of Contents
Allocation of Purchase Price of Acquired Assets
Upon the acquisition of real properties, we allocate the purchase price of properties to acquired
tangible assets, consisting of land and building, and identified intangible assets and liabilities,
consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases and the value of in-place leases,
based in each case on their fair values.
We utilize independent appraisals performed using the cost approach to determine the fair values of
the tangible assets of an acquired property (which includes land and building). Factors considered
by management in performing these analyses include an estimate of carrying costs during the
expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar
leases, including leasing commissions and other related costs. In estimating carrying costs,
management includes real estate taxes, insurance, and other operating expenses during the expected
lease-up periods based on current market demand.
The fair values of above-market and below-market in-place leases are recorded based on the present
value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the
differences between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii)
estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, which is generally
obtained from independent appraisals, measured over a period equal to the remaining terms of the
leases. The capitalized above-market and below-market lease values are recorded as intangible
lease assets or liabilities and amortized as an adjustment to rental income over the remaining
terms of the leases.
The fair values of in-place leases include direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant,
opportunity costs associated with lost rentals which are avoided by acquiring an in-place lease,
and tenant relationships. Direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant include commissions,
tenant improvements and other direct costs and are estimated based on independent appraisals and
managements consideration of current market costs to execute a similar lease. These direct costs
are included in intangible lease assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are
amortized to expense over the remaining terms of the respective leases. The value of opportunity
costs is calculated using the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases over a
market absorption period for a similar lease. Customer relationships are valued based on expected
renewal of a lease or the likelihood of obtaining a particular tenant for other locations. These
lease intangibles are included in intangible lease assets in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets and are amortized to rental income over the remaining term of the respective leases.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, approximately $1,000 in amortization of
intangible lease assets was recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Commitments and Contingencies
We are subject to certain contingencies and commitments with regard to certain transactions. Refer
to Notes 2 & 5 to our consolidated financial statements for further explanations. Examples of such
commitments and contingencies include:
| Properties under contract (Note 5) | ||
| Reimbursement of offering-related costs (Note 2) |
Related-Party Transactions and Agreements
We have entered into agreements with our Advisor and its affiliates, whereby we pay certain fees or
reimbursements to our Advisor or its affiliates for acquisition fees and expenses, organization and
offering costs, sales commissions, dealer manager fees, asset and management fees and reimbursement
of operating costs. See Note 6 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this
report for a discussion of the various related-party transactions, agreements and fees.
Subsequent Events
Certain events occurred subsequent to September 30, 2005 through the date of this report. Refer to
Note 9 to our condensed consolidated financial statements for further explanation. Such events
include:
| Sale of shares of common stock; | ||
| Acquisition of a property in Brainerd, MN; | ||
| Acquisition of a property in Alliance, OH; | ||
| Acquisition of a property in Glendale, AZ; | ||
| Acquisition of three properties in Missouri; | ||
| Various borrowings with Wachovia Bank National Association relating to the acquisitions described above; and |
19
Table of Contents
| Declaration of distributions. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
SFAS No. 123R, Share Based Payment, is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005.
We will be required to adopt the new standard on January 1, 2006. This statement requires
companies to expense the value of employee stock options and similar awards. We are currently
evaluating the impact of the standard on our consolidated financial statements.
In July 2005, the FASB issued Staff Position (FSP) Statement of Position (SOP) 78-9-1,
Interaction of American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) SOP 78-9 and Emerging
Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 04-5. The EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 04-5,
Determining Whether a General Partner or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited
Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights stating that a general
partner is presumed to control a limited partnership and should consolidate the limited partnership
unless the limited partners possess substantive kick-out rights or the limited partners possess
substantive participating rights. This FSP eliminates the concept of important rights of SOP
78-9 and replaces it with the concepts of kick-out rights and substantive participating rights
as defined in Issue 04-5. This EITF and FSP are effective after June 29, 2005 for general partners
of all new partnerships formed and for existing partnerships for which the partnership agreements
are modified. For general partners in all other partnerships, this guidance is effective no later
than January 1, 2006. We are currently evaluating the impact of this FSP on our financial
statements.
20
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
In connection with property acquisitions, we have obtained variable rate debt financing (described
below) to fund a property acquisition, and therefore we are exposed to interest rate changes in the
LIBOR rate. Our objectives in managing interest rate risk will be to limit the impact of interest
rate changes on operations and cash flows, and to lower overall borrowing costs. To achieve these
objectives, we will borrow primarily at interest rates with the lowest margins available and, in
some cases, with the ability to convert variable interest rates to fixed rates. In the future, we
may enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps, caps and treasury
locks in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on a given financial instrument. We will not
enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes.
As of September 30, 2005, approximately $0.8 million of the approximately $2.6 million outstanding
on the TS Parkersburg Loan was subject to a variable interest rate, which is based on the one-month
LIBOR rate plus 200 basis points.
We do not have any foreign operations and thus we are not exposed to foreign currency fluctuations.
21
Table of Contents
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
We have established disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act) to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the officers who certify the Companys financial
reports and to other members of senior management and the Board of Directors.
Based on their evaluation as of September 30, 2005, our principal executive officer and principal
financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to
ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company
in the reports that it files or
submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the rules, regulations and forms of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Commission").
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f)
and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended September 30, 2005, that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
We have confidence in our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial
reporting. Nevertheless, our management, including our principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control
over financial reporting will prevent all error, misstatements or fraud. A control system, no
matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that
the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect
the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered
relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation
of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any,
within the Company have been detected.
22
Table of Contents
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
No events occurred during the quarter covered by this report that would require a response to this item.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On June 27, 2005, our Registration Statement (No. 333-121094), covering a public offering of up to
45,000,000 shares of common stock to be offered at a price of $10 per share, subject to reduction
in certain circumstances, was declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933. The
Registration Statement also covers up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock available pursuant to our
distribution reinvestment plan.
On September 23, 2005, we issued the initial approximately 486,000 shares in the Offering. As of
September 30, 2005, we had issued approximately 600,000 shares for gross offering proceeds of
approximately $6.0 million, out of which we paid costs of approximately $65,000 in acquisition
fees, approximately $497,000 in selling commissions and dealer manager fees, and approximately
$90,000 in organization and offering costs to the Advisor or its affiliates. With the net offering
proceeds and indebtedness, we acquired approximately $3.4 million in real estate and related
assets. As of November 10, 2005, we have sold approximately 1.2 million shares in our primary
offering at an aggregate offering price of $10.2 million.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
No events occurred during the quarter covered by this report that would require a response to this
item.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No events occurred during the quarter covered by this report that would require a response to this
item.
Item 5. Other Information
No events occurred during the quarter covered by this report that would require a response to this
item.
Item 6. Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index (following the signatures section of this report) are
included, or incorporated by reference, in this quarterly report.
23
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Cole Credit Property Trust II, Inc. (Registrant) |
||||||
By: | /s/ Christopher H. Cole | |||||
Christopher H. Cole | ||||||
Chief Executive Officer and President | ||||||
By: | /s/ Blair D. Koblenz | |||||
Blair D. Koblenz | ||||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Date: November 14, 2005
24
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
The following exhibits are included, or incorporated by reference, in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of
Regulation S-K).
Exhibit No. | Description | |
10.1
|
Purchase Agreement between Cole TS Parkersburg WV, LLC, and C&F Development Associates, LLC pursuant to an Assignment of Agreement of Purchase and Sale Agreement dated September 23, 2005. | |
10.2
|
Promissory Note between Cole TS Parkersburg WV, LLC, and Wachovia Bank National Association dated September 26, 2005. | |
10.3
|
Purchase Agreement between Cole WG Brainerd MN, LLC, and Brainerd Drugstore, LLC pursuant to an Assignment of Purchase Agreement and Escrow Instructions dated September 28, 2005. | |
10.4
|
Promissory Note between Cole WG Brainerd MN, LLC, and Wachovia Bank National Association dated October 5, 2005. | |
10.5
|
Purchase Agreement between Cole RA Alliance OH, LLC, and Monogram Development XV, LTD pursuant to an Assignment of Purchase Agreement dated October 19, 2005. | |
10.6
|
Purchase Agreement between Cole LZ Glendale AZ, LLC, and E&R Bell Road, LLC pursuant to an Assignment of Purchase Agreement and Escrow Instructions dated October 25, 2005. | |
10.7
|
Promissory Note between Cole LZ Glendale AZ, LLC, and Wachovia Bank National Association dated October 25, 2005. | |
10.8
|
Purchase Agreement between Cole WG St. Louis MO Portfolio, LLC, and Teachers Retirement System of the State of Kentucky pursuant to an Assignment of Purchase Agreement and Escrow Instructions dated November 1, 2005. | |
10.9
|
Promissory Note between Cole WG St. Louis MO Portfolio, LLC, and Wachovia Bank National Association dated November 2, 2005. | |
31.1
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.1
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
25