Stagwell Inc - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
|
|
or
|
|
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For
the transition period from ______________ to ______________
Commission
file number: 001-13178
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Canada
|
98-0364441
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
|
(IRS
Employer Identification No.)
|
45
Hazelton Avenue
Toronto,
Ontario, Canada
|
|
M5R
2E3
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(416)
960-9000
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code:
950
Third Avenue, New York, New York 10022
(646)
429-1800
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer; a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated Filer o
|
Accelerated
filer x
|
|
Non-accelerated Filer
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company.)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
o No x
The
numbers of shares outstanding as of July 28, 2010 were: 29,567,601 Class A
subordinate voting shares and 2,503 Class B multiple voting
shares.
Website
Access to Company Reports
MDC
Partners Inc.’s internet website address is www.mdc-partners.com. The Company’s
annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and
current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or
furnished pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, will
be made available free of charge through the Company’s website as soon as
reasonably practical after those reports are electronically filed with, or
furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information
found on, or otherwise accessible through, the Company’s website is not
incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this quarterly report on Form
10-Q.
MDC
PARTNERS INC.
QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Page
|
||||
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
2
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the Three and Six
Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
|
2
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and
December 31, 2009
|
3
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the Six Months Ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009
|
4
|
|||
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
5
|
|||
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
26
|
||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
45
|
||
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
45
|
||
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
|
||||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
46
|
||
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
46
|
||
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
46
|
||
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
46
|
||
Item
4.
|
Reserved
|
46
|
||
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
46
|
||
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
46
|
||
Signatures
|
47
|
Item
1. Financial Statements
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)
(thousands
of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Revenue:
|
||||||||||||||||
Services
|
$
|
169,989
|
$
|
134,882
|
$
|
306,171
|
$
|
261,620
|
||||||||
Operating
Expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cost
of services sold
|
116,766
|
88,238
|
213,735
|
174,117
|
||||||||||||
Office
and general expenses
|
39,110
|
30,173
|
73,735
|
61,325
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
8,039
|
7,604
|
13,872
|
15,197
|
||||||||||||
163,915
|
126,015
|
301,342
|
250,639
|
|||||||||||||
Operating
profit
|
6,074
|
8,867
|
4,829
|
10,981
|
||||||||||||
Other
Income (Expenses):
|
||||||||||||||||
Other
income (expense), net
|
(287
|
)
|
(2,541
|
)
|
(900
|
)
|
89
|
|||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(8,425
|
)
|
(3,723
|
)
|
(15,453
|
)
|
(7,484
|
)
|
||||||||
Interest
income
|
57
|
70
|
78
|
272
|
||||||||||||
(8,655
|
)
|
(6,194
|
)
|
(16,275
|
)
|
(7,123
|
)
|
|||||||||
Income
(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes, equity in
affiliates
|
(2,581
|
)
|
2,673
|
(11,446
|
)
|
3,858
|
||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
552
|
1,608
|
801
|
2,223
|
||||||||||||
Income
(loss) from continuing operations before equity in
affiliates
|
(3,133
|
)
|
1,065
|
(12,247
|
)
|
1,635
|
||||||||||
Equity
in earnings (loss) of non-consolidated affiliates
|
(39
|
)
|
105
|
(143
|
)
|
198
|
||||||||||
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
|
(3,172
|
)
|
1,170
|
(12,390
|
)
|
1,833
|
||||||||||
Loss
from discontinued operations attributable to MDC Partners Inc., net of
taxes
|
(647
|
)
|
(108
|
)
|
(647
|
)
|
(361
|
)
|
||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
(3,819
|
)
|
1,062
|
(13,037
|
)
|
1,472
|
||||||||||
Net
income attributable to the noncontrolling interests
|
(1,986
|
)
|
(983
|
)
|
(2,954
|
)
|
(1,365
|
)
|
||||||||
Net
income (loss) attributable to MDC Partners Inc.
|
$
|
(5,805
|
)
|
$
|
79
|
$
|
(15,991
|
)
|
$ |
107
|
||||||
Income
(loss) Per Common Share:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
and Diluted:
|
||||||||||||||||
Income
(loss) from continuing operations attributable to MDC Partners Inc. common
shareholders
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
$
|
0.01
|
$
|
(0.55
|
)
|
$
|
0.02
|
||||||
Discontinued
operations attributable to MDC Partners Inc. common
shareholders
|
(0.02
|
)
|
(0.00
|
)
|
(0.02
|
)
|
(0.01
|
)
|
||||||||
Net
income (loss) attributable to MDC Partners Inc. common
shareholders
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
$
|
0.01
|
$
|
(0.57
|
)
|
$
|
0.01
|
||||||
Weighted
Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
27,800,953
|
27,440,030
|
27,716,895
|
27,278,786
|
||||||||||||
Diluted
|
27,800,953
|
27,684,194
|
27,716,895
|
27,278,786
|
||||||||||||
Non
cash stock-based compensation expense is included in the following line
items above:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cost
of services sold
|
$
|
637
|
$
|
286
|
$
|
1,317
|
$
|
497
|
||||||||
Office
and general expenses
|
2,251
|
1,759
|
5,038
|
3,445
|
||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
2,888
|
$
|
2,045
|
$
|
6,355
|
$
|
3,942
|
See notes
to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
MDC
PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(thousands
of United States dollars)
|
June 30,
2010
|
December 31,
2009
|
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
Assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
47,454
|
$
|
51,926
|
||||
Accounts
receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,280 and
$2,034
|
146,346
|
118,211
|
||||||
Expenditures
billable to clients
|
44,708
|
24,003
|
||||||
Other
current assets
|
10,603
|
8,105
|
||||||
Total
Current Assets
|
249,111
|
202,245
|
||||||
Fixed
assets, at cost, less accumulated depreciation of $89,247 and
$82,752
|
37,073
|
35,375
|
||||||
Investment
in affiliates
|
1,385
|
1,547
|
||||||
Goodwill
|
415,541
|
301,632
|
||||||
Other
intangibles assets, net
|
57,164
|
34,715
|
||||||
Deferred
tax asset
|
12,546
|
12,542
|
||||||
Other
assets
|
19,166
|
16,463
|
||||||
Total
Assets
|
$
|
791,986
|
$
|
604,519
|
||||
LIABILITIES,
REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING
INTERESTS,
AND EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
88,721
|
$
|
77,450
|
||||
Accruals
and other liabilities
|
59,299
|
66,967
|
||||||
Advance
billings
|
122,957
|
65,879
|
||||||
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
1,502
|
1,456
|
||||||
Current
portion of deferred acquisition consideration
|
23,640
|
30,645
|
||||||
Total
Current Liabilities
|
296,119
|
242,397
|
||||||
Revolving
credit facility
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Long-term
debt
|
284,640
|
216,490
|
||||||
Long-term
portion of deferred acquisition consideration
|
40,328
|
—
|
||||||
Other
liabilities
|
8,519
|
8,707
|
||||||
Deferred
tax liabilities
|
8,989
|
9,051
|
||||||
Total
Liabilities
|
638,595
|
476,645
|
||||||
Redeemable
Noncontrolling Interests (Note 2)
|
34,626
|
33,728
|
||||||
Commitments,
contingencies and guarantees (Note 13)
|
||||||||
Shareholders’
Equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
shares, unlimited authorized, none issued
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Class A
Shares, no par value, unlimited authorized, 27,818,986 and 27,566,815
shares issued in 2010 and 2009
|
220,029
|
218,532
|
||||||
Class B
Shares, no par value, unlimited authorized, 2,503 shares issued in 2010
and 2009, each convertible into one Class A share
|
1
|
1
|
||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
6,491
|
9,174
|
||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(147,151
|
)
|
(131,160
|
)
|
||||
Stock
subscription receivable
|
(217
|
)
|
(341
|
)
|
||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(5,420
|
)
|
(5,880
|
)
|
||||
MDC
Partners Inc. Shareholders’ Equity
|
73,733
|
90,326
|
||||||
Noncontrolling
Interests
|
45,032
|
3,820
|
||||||
Total
Equity
|
118,765
|
94,146
|
||||||
Total
Liabilities, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests and
Equity
|
$
|
791,986
|
$
|
604,519
|
See notes
to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
MDC
PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)
(thousands
of United States dollars)
Six Months Ended June
30,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$
|
(13,037
|
)
|
$
|
1,472
|
|||
Net
income attributable to the noncontrolling interests
|
(2,954
|
)
|
(1,365
|
)
|
||||
Net
income (loss) attributable to MDC Partners Inc.
|
(15,991
|
)
|
107
|
|||||
Loss
from discontinued operations attributable to MDC Partners Inc., net of
taxes
|
(647
|
)
|
(361
|
)
|
||||
Income
(loss) attributable to MDC Partners Inc. from continuing
operations
|
(15,344
|
)
|
468
|
|||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) attributable to MDC Partners Inc. from
continuing operations to cash provided by (used in) operating
activities
|
||||||||
Depreciation
|
7,621
|
8,171
|
||||||
Amortization
of intangibles
|
6,251
|
7,026
|
||||||
Non-cash
stock-based compensation
|
5,287
|
3,511
|
||||||
Amortization
of deferred finance charges and debt discount
|
862
|
661
|
||||||
Adjustment
to deferred acquisition consideration
|
1,589
|
—
|
||||||
Gain
on disposition of assets
|
(13
|
)
|
—
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(55
|
)
|
1,034
|
|||||
Loss
(earnings) of non-consolidated affiliates
|
143
|
(198
|
)
|
|||||
Other
non-current assets and liabilities
|
(1,039
|
)
|
3,303
|
|||||
Foreign
exchange
|
498
|
920
|
||||||
Changes
in working capital:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
1,670
|
(11,191
|
)
|
|||||
Expenditures
billable to clients
|
(8,418
|
)
|
(1,727
|
)
|
||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
(1,031
|
)
|
1,021
|
|||||
Accounts
payable, accruals and other liabilities
|
(16,508
|
)
|
7,474
|
|||||
Advance
billings
|
16,023
|
1,248
|
||||||
Cash
flows provided by (used in) continuing operating
activities
|
(2,464
|
)
|
21,721
|
|||||
Discontinued
operations
|
(269
|
)
|
(290
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
(2,733
|
)
|
21,431
|
|||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
(5,720
|
)
|
(2,087
|
)
|
||||
Acquisitions,
net of cash acquired
|
(57,476
|
)
|
(3,643
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
(loss) from sale of assets
|
58
|
(56
|
)
|
|||||
Other
investments
|
(99
|
)
|
(33
|
)
|
||||
Profit
distributions from affiliates
|
7
|
59
|
||||||
Cash
Flows used in continuing investing activities
|
(63,230
|
)
|
(5,760
|
)
|
||||
Discontinued
operations
|
(710
|
)
|
—
|
|||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(63,940
|
)
|
(5,760
|
)
|
||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of 11% Senior Notes
|
67,600
|
—
|
||||||
Proceeds
from revolving credit facility
|
—
|
2,159
|
||||||
Repayment
of long-term debt
|
(479
|
)
|
(897
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from stock subscription receivable
|
124
|
13
|
||||||
Proceeds
from exercise options
|
51
|
—
|
||||||
Purchase
of treasury shares
|
(896
|
)
|
(402
|
)
|
||||
Deferred
financing costs
|
(1,491
|
)
|
—
|
|||||
Payment
of dividends
|
(2,781
|
)
|
—
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
62,128
|
873
|
||||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
73
|
59
|
||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(4,472
|
)
|
16,603
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
51,926
|
41,331
|
||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
47,454
|
$
|
57,934
|
||||
Supplemental
disclosures:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid to noncontrolling partners
|
$
|
5,159
|
$
|
4,574
|
||||
Cash
income taxes paid
|
$
|
803
|
$
|
402
|
||||
Cash
interest paid
|
$
|
13,411
|
$
|
6,962
|
||||
Dividends
payable
|
$
|
208
|
$
|
—
|
||||
Non-cash
transactions:
|
||||||||
Capital
leases
|
$
|
274
|
$
|
288
|
See notes
to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(thousands
of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated)
1.
Basis of Presentation
MDC
Partners Inc. (the “Company”) has prepared the unaudited condensed consolidated
interim financial statements included herein pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual
financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles (“GAAP”) of the United States of America (“US GAAP”) have been
condensed or omitted pursuant to these rules.
The
accompanying financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of
normally recurring accruals, which in the opinion of management are necessary
for a fair presentation, in all material respects, of the information contained
therein. Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily
indicative of annual results.
These
statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and related notes included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009.
2.
Significant Accounting
Policies
The
Company’s significant accounting policies are summarized as
follows:
Principles of Consolidation .
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of MDC Partners Inc. and its domestic and international controlled
subsidiaries that are not considered variable interest entities, and variable
interest entities for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. Intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates. The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities including goodwill,
intangible assets, valuation allowances for receivables and deferred tax assets,
and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period.
The estimates are evaluated on an ongoing basis and estimates are based on
historical experience, current conditions and various other assumptions believed
to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Concentration of Credit Risk
. The Company provides marketing communications services to clients who operate
in most industry sectors. Credit is granted to qualified clients in the ordinary
course of business. Due to the diversified nature of the Company’s client base,
the Company does not believe that it is exposed to a concentration of credit
risk; the Company did not have a client that accounted for more than 10% of the
Company’s consolidated accounts receivable at June 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009. Furthermore, the Company did not have a client that accounted
for more than 10% of the Company’s revenue for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010. However, one client accounted for 18% of revenue for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009.
Cash and Cash Equivalents.
The Company’s cash equivalents are primarily comprised of investments in
overnight interest-bearing deposits, commercial paper and money market
instruments and other short-term investments with original maturity dates of
three months or less at the time of purchase. The Company has a concentration
risk in that there are cash deposits in excess of federally insured amounts.
Included in cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, is approximately $71 and $67, respectively, of cash restricted as to
withdrawal pursuant to a collateral agreement and a customer’s contractual
requirements.
5
MDC
PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Thousands
of United States Dollars, Unless Otherwise Stated Except Share and per Share
Amounts)
2.
Significant Accounting Policies – (continued)
Business Combinations.
Valuation of acquired companies are based on a number of
factors, including specialized know-how, reputation, competitive position and
service offerings. Our acquisition strategy has been focused on acquiring the
expertise of an assembled workforce in order to continue to build upon the core
capabilities
of our various strategic business platforms to better serve our clients.
Consistent with our acquisition strategy and past practice of acquiring a
majority ownership position, most acquisitions completed in 2010 and 2009
included an initial payment at the time of closing and provide for future
additional contingent purchase price payments. Contingent payments for these
transactions, as well as certain acquisitions completed in prior years, are
derived using the performance of the acquired entity and are based on
pre-determined formulas. Contingent purchase price obligations for acquisitions
completed prior to January 1, 2009 are accrued when the contingency is resolved
and payment is certain. Contingent purchase price obligations related to
acquisitions completed subsequent to December 31, 2008 are recorded as
liabilities at estimated value and are remeasured at each reporting period and
changes in estimated value are recorded in results of operations. For the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, $1,311 and nil, respectively, and for the
three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, $977 and nil, respectively, related
to changes in estimated value, have been charged to operations. In addition,
certain acquisitions also include put/call obligations for additional equity
ownership interests. The estimated value of these interests are recorded as
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests. As of January 1, 2009, the Company expenses
acquisition related costs in accordance with the Accounting Standard’s
Codification’s new guidance on acquisition accounting. For the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010, $331 and $730, respectively, of
acquisition related costs have been charged to operations. For the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009, no acquisition related costs were charged to
operating.
For each
of our acquisitions, we undertake a detailed review to identify other intangible
assets and a valuation is performed for all such identified assets. We use
several market participant measurements to determine estimated value. This
approach includes consideration of similar and recent transactions, as well as
utilizing discounted expected cash flow methodologies. Like most service
businesses, a substantial portion of the intangible asset value that we acquire
is the specialized know-how of the workforce, which is treated as part of
goodwill and is not required to be valued separately. The majority of the value
of the identifiable intangible assets that we acquire is derived from customer
relationships, including the related customer contracts, as well as trade names.
In executing our acquisition strategy, one of the primary drivers in identifying
and executing a specific transaction is the existence of, or the ability to,
expand our existing client relationships. The expected benefits of our
acquisitions are typically shared across multiple agencies and
regions.
Redeemable Noncontrolling
Interest . The minority interest shareholders of certain
subsidiaries have the right to require the Company to acquire their ownership
interest under certain circumstances pursuant to a contractual arrangement and
the Company has similar call options under the same contractual terms. The
amount of consideration under the put and call rights is not a fixed amount, but
rather is dependent upon various valuation formulas and on future events, such
as the average earnings of the relevant subsidiary through the date of exercise,
the growth rate of the earnings of the relevant subsidiary through the date of
exercise, etc. as described in Note 13.
The
Company has recorded its put options as mezzanine equity at their current
estimated redemption amounts. The Company accounts for the put options with a
charge to noncontrolling interests to reflect the excess, if any, of the
estimated exercise price over the estimated fair value of the noncontrolling
interest shares at the date of the option being exercised. Changes in the
estimated redemption amounts of the put options are adjusted at each reporting
period with a corresponding adjustment to equity. These adjustments will not
impact the calculation of earnings per share.
6
MDC
PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Thousands
of United States Dollars, Unless Otherwise Stated Except Share and per Share
Amounts)
2.
Significant Accounting Policies – (continued)
The
following table presents changes in Redeemable Noncontrolling
Interests.
Three Months
Ended June 30, 2010
|
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2010
|
|||||||
Beginning
Balance
|
$
|
29,868
|
$
|
33,728
|
||||
Redemptions
|
(122
|
)
|
(1,407
|
) | ||||
Granted
|
2,506
|
3,782
|
||||||
Changes
in redemption value
|
3,218
|
(1,015
|
) | |||||
Currency
Translation Adjustments
|
(844
|
)
|
(462
|
) | ||||
Ending
Balance as of June 30, 2010
|
$
|
34,626
|
$
|
34,626
|
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company’s revenue recognition policies are as required by the Revenue
Recognition topics of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, and
accordingly, revenue is generally recognized as services are provided or upon
delivery of the products when ownership and risk of loss has transferred to the
customer, the selling price is fixed or determinable and collection of the
resulting receivable is reasonably assured. The Company follows the Revenue
Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables topic of the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification issued. This topic addresses certain aspects of the accounting by a
vendor for arrangements under which it will perform multiple revenue-generating
activities and how to determine whether an arrangement involving multiple
deliverables contains more than one unit of accounting. The Company recognizes
revenue based on the contracted value of each multiple deliverable when
delivered. The Company also follows the topic of the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent. This
Issue summarized the EITF’s views on when revenue should be recorded at the
gross amount billed because it has earned revenue from the sale of goods or
services, or the net amount retained because it has earned a fee or commission.
The Company also follows Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements
Received for Out-of-Pocket Expenses Incurred, for reimbursements received for
out-of-pocket expenses. This issue summarized the EITF’s views that
reimbursements received for out-of-pocket expenses incurred should be
characterized in the income statement as revenue. Accordingly, the Company has
included in revenue such reimbursed expenses.
The
Company earns revenue from agency arrangements in the form of retainer fees or
commissions; from short-term project arrangements in the form of fixed fees or
per diem fees for services; and from incentives or bonuses.
Non
refundable retainer fees are generally recognized on a straight line basis over
the term of the specific customer contract. Commission revenue is earned and
recognized upon the placement of advertisements in various media when the
Company has no further performance obligations. Fixed fees for services are
recognized upon completion of the earnings process and acceptance by the client.
Per diem fees are recognized upon the performance of the Company’s services. In
addition, for certain service transactions, which require delivery of a number
of service acts, the Company uses the Proportional Performance model, which
generally results in revenue being recognized based on the straight-line method
due to the acts being non-similar and there being insufficient evidence of fair
value for each service provided.
7
MDC
PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Thousands
of United States Dollars, Unless Otherwise Stated Except Share and per Share
Amounts)
2.
Significant Accounting Policies – (continued)
Fees
billed to clients in excess of fees recognized as revenue are classified as
Advanced Billings.
A small
portion of the Company’s contractual arrangements with customers includes
performance incentive provisions, which allows the Company to earn additional
revenues as a result of its performance relative to both quantitative and
qualitative goals. The Company recognizes the incentive portion of revenue under
these arrangements when specific quantitative goals are achieved, or when the
company’s clients determine performance against qualitative goals has been
achieved. In all circumstances, revenue is only recognized when collection is
reasonably assured. The Company records revenue net of sales and other taxes due
to be collected and remitted to governmental authorities.
Interest Expense
. Interest expense primarily consists of the cost of borrowing on the
revolving credit facility and the 11% Senior Notes. The Company uses the
effective interest method to amortize the original issue discount and original
issue premium on the 11% Senior Notes. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
$473 and $204 was amortized, respectively, net of amortized premium of $49 and
nil, respectively. The Company amortizes deferred financing costs using the
effective interest method over the life of the 11% Senior Notes and straight
line over the life of the revolving credit facility. The total net deferred
financing costs, included in Other Assets on the balance sheet, as of June 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009 were $10,712 and $9,790, net of accumulated
amortization of $869 and $295, respectively. During the six months of
2010, the Company recorded $1,491 of deferred financing costs primarily relating
to the 2010 additional debt issuance.
Stock-Based Compensation.
Under the fair value method, compensation cost is measured at fair
value at the date of grant and is expensed over the service period, that is the
award’s vesting period. When awards are exercised, share capital is credited by
the sum of the consideration paid together with the related portion previously
credited to additional paid-in capital when compensation costs were charged
against income or acquisition consideration.
The
Company uses its historical volatility derived over the expected term of the
award, to determine the volatility factor used in determining the fair value of
the award. The Company uses the “simplified” method to determine the term of the
award due to the fact that historical share option exercise experience does not
provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the expected
term.
Stock-based
awards that are settled in cash or may be settled in cash at the option of
employees are recorded as liabilities. The measurement of the liability and
compensation cost for these awards is based on the fair value of the award, and
is recorded into operating income over the service period, that is the vesting
period of the award. Changes in the Company’s payment obligation prior to the
settlement date are recorded as compensation cost in operating profit in the
period of the change. The final payment amount for such awards is established on
the date of the exercise of the award by the employee.
Stock-based
awards that are settled in cash or equity at the option of the Company are
recorded at fair value on the date of grant and recorded as additional paid-in
capital. The fair value measurement of the compensation cost for these awards is
based on using the Black-Scholes option pricing-model and is recorded in
operating income over the service period, that is the vesting period of the
award.
8
It is the
Company’s policy for issuing shares upon the exercise of an equity incentive
award to verify the amount of shares to be issued, as well as the amount of
proceeds to be collected (if any) and delivery of new shares to the exercising
party.
The
Company has adopted the straight-line attribution method for determining the
compensation cost to be recorded during each accounting period. However, awards
based on performance conditions are recorded as compensation expense when the
performance conditions are expected to be met.
The
Company treats benefits paid by shareholders to employees as a stock based
compensation charge with a corresponding credit to additional
paid-in-capital.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 990,096 restricted stock
units and restricted stock shares (“RSUs”) to its employees and
directors. The RSUs have an aggregate grant date fair value of $8,991
and generally vest on the third anniversary date with certain awards subjected
to accelerated vesting based on the financial performance of the
Company.
For the
six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company has recorded a $1,469 charge
relating to these equity incentive grants.
A total
of 1,077,549 Class A shares of restricted stock, granted to employees as
equity incentive awards, are included in the Company’s calculation of
Class A shares outstanding as of June 30, 2010.
9
3 .
Income
(loss) Per Common Share
The
following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted income (loss)
per common share from continuing operations.
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Numerator
|
||||||||||||||||
Numerator
for basic income (loss) per common share - income (loss) from continuing
operations
|
$
|
(3,172
|
)
|
$
|
1,170
|
$
|
(12,390
|
)
|
$
|
1,833
|
||||||
Net
income attributable to the noncontrolling interests
|
(1,986
|
)
|
(983
|
)
|
(2,954
|
)
|
(1,365
|
) | ||||||||
Income
(loss) attributable to MDC Partners Inc. common shareholders from
continuing operations
|
$
|
(5,158
|
)
|
$
|
187
|
$
|
(15,344
|
)
|
$
|
468
|
||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Numerator
for diluted income (loss) per common share – income (loss) attributable to
MDC Partners Inc. common shareholders from continuing
operations
|
$
|
(5,158
|
)
|
$
|
187
|
$
|
(15,344
|
)
|
$
|
468
|
||||||
Denominator
|
||||||||||||||||
Denominator
for basic income (loss) per common share - weighted average common
shares
|
27,800,953
|
27,440,030
|
27,716,895
|
27,278,786
|
||||||||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
—
|
244,164
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Denominator
for diluted income (loss) per common share - adjusted weighted
shares
|
27,800,953
|
27,684,194
|
27,716,895
|
27,278,786
|
||||||||||||
Basic
income (loss) per common share from continuing operations attributable to
MDC Partners Inc.
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
$
|
0.01
|
$
|
(0.55
|
)
|
$
|
0.02
|
||||||
Diluted
income (loss) per common share from continuing operations attributable to
MDC Partners Inc.
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
$
|
0.01
|
$
|
(0.55
|
)
|
$
|
0.02
|
During
the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, options and other rights to
purchase 5,824,866 shares of common stock, which includes 1,077,549 shares of
non-vested restricted stock, were outstanding but were not included in the
computation of diluted loss per common share because their effect would be
antidilutive.
During
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the 8% convertible
debentures, options and other rights to purchase 8,863,413 shares of common
stock, which includes 615,472 shares of non-vested restricted stock, were
outstanding but were not included in the computation of diluted income per
common share because their effect would be antidilutive.
4.
Acquisitions
Second
Quarter 2010 Acquisitions
Effective
May 6, 2010, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, purchased 75% of
the total outstanding membership interests in Integrated Media Solutions, LLC
(“IMS”), which expands the Company’s direct response marketing
capabilities. At closing, the Company paid cash of $20,000 plus
additional contingent deferred acquisition consideration, based on actual
results from 2010 to 2015 with final payments due in 2016, with a current
estimated present value of $19,658. An initial estimated allocation
of the excess purchase consideration of this acquisition to the fair value of
the net assets acquired resulted in identifiable intangibles of $9,081
(consisting of primarily customer lists and a covenant not to compete) and
goodwill of $44,598 representing the value of the assembled
workforce. The fair value of the noncontrolling interest not acquired
at the acquisition date was $13,219 based in the Company’s evaluation of the
Company being acquired and the purchase price paid by the
Company. The identified intangibles will be amortized ranging from a
five to seven-year period in a manner represented by the pattern in which the
economic benefits of the customer contracts/relationships are
realized. The intangibles and goodwill are tax
deductible.
The
actual adjustments that the Company will ultimately make in finalizing the
allocation of the purchase price of IMS to the fair value of the net assets
acquired at May 6, 2010 will depend on a number of factors, including additional
information such as changes in the unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
During
the quarter ended June 30, 2010, the Company completed a number of acquisitions.
The Company purchased a 51% equity interest in Allison & Partners LLC
(“Allison”), a 75% equity interest in Sloane & Company LLC (“Sloane”), and
certain assets and liabilities of CSC – ADPLUS, LLC (d.b.a. Infolure)
(“Infolure”). Allison is a full service public relations and corporate
communications agency. Sloane is a communication firm focused on
corporate positioning and communications, financial public relations and
investor relations, and crisis and transactions
communications. Infolure is a direct marketing firm. The purchase
price paid for these acquisitions consisted of aggregate cash payments of
$17,632 plus additional contingent payments of $15,795 that are based on actual
results from 2010 to 2015 with final payments due in 2016. An allocation of the
excess purchase consideration of these acquisitions to the fair value of the net
assets acquired resulted in identifiable intangibles of $9,431 consisting
primarily of customer lists and covenants not to compete, and goodwill of
$36,286 representing the value of the assembled workforce. The
identified intangibles will be amortized ranging from a five to seven-year
period in a manner represented by the pattern in which the economic benefits of
the customer contracts/relationships are realized. In addition, the
Company has recorded $2,506, the present value of redeemable noncontrolling
interests in relation to Sloane. The Sloane acquisition has put
rights that could increase the Company’s ownership to 100% in
2015. The amounts paid and to be paid will be tax
deductible.
The
actual adjustments that the Company will ultimately make in analyzing the
allocation of purchase price to the fair value of the net assets acquired, will
depend on a number of factors, including additional information such as changes
in the unaudited financial statements.
First
Quarter 2010 Acquisitions
Effective
March 1, 2010, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, purchased 60% of
the total outstanding membership interests in Team Holdings LLC (“Team”), which
expands the Company’s experiential marketing capabilities. At
closing, the Company paid cash of $11,000 plus additional contingent deferred
acquisition consideration, based on actual results from 2010 to 2012 with final
payments in 2013, with a current estimated present value of $12,656, and the
Company paid a working capital true-up estimated at an additional $253 at March
31, 2010. An initial estimated allocation of the excess purchase
consideration of this acquisition to the fair value of the net assets acquired
resulted in identifiable intangibles of $5,220 (consisting of primarily customer
lists and a covenant not to compete) and goodwill of $32,830 representing the
value of the assembled workforce. The fair value of the
noncontrolling interest not acquired at the acquisition date was $15,771 based
in the Company’s evaluation of the Company being acquired and the purchase price
paid by the Company. The identified intangibles will be amortized up
to a seven-year period in a manner represented by the pattern in which the
economic benefits of the customer contracts/relationships are
realized. In addition, the Company amended the purchase agreement to
include additional deferred acquisition consideration, with a current present
value of $3,071, with final payments due in 2012. The additional
deferred acquisition consideration resulted in additional intangibles of
$3,071. The intangibles and goodwill are tax deductible.
The
actual adjustments that the Company will ultimately make in analyzing the
allocation of purchase price to the fair value of the net assets acquired, will
depend on a number of factors, including additional information such as changes
in the unaudited financial statements.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company completed a number of
acquisitions and step-ups in ownership. The Company purchased a 76% equity
interest in Communifx Partners LLC (“Communifx”), substantially all of the
assets of Plaid Inc. (“Plaid”), an additional 15% equity interest in Fletcher
Martin, LLC (“Fletcher Martin”), an additional 49% equity interest in Trend
Core, LLC (“Trend Core”), and an additional 1% equity interest in HL Group
Partners, LLC (“HL Group”). Communifx builds and manages large-scale customer
database solutions to enable the planning, execution, and measurement of
multi-channel marketing and advertising programs. Plaid is a
marketing services business with a concentration in the digital communication
and social media arena. The Company purchased the additional equity
interests in Fletcher Martin and HL Group pursuant to the exercise of
outstanding puts. The purchase price paid for these acquisitions and step-ups
consisted of aggregate cash payments of $4,921 plus additional contingent
payments of $580 that are based on actual results from 2010 to 2015 with final
payments due in 2016. An allocation of the excess purchase consideration of
these acquisitions to the fair value of the net assets acquired resulted in
identifiable intangibles of $1,851 consisting primarily of customer lists and a
covenant not to compete, and goodwill of $2,426 representing the value of the
assembled workforce. The identified intangibles will be amortized up
to a seven-year period in a manner represented by the pattern in which the
economic benefits of the customer contracts/relationships are
realized. In addition, the Company has recorded $710, the present
value of redeemable noncontrolling interests in relation to
Communifx. The Communifx acquisition has put/call rights that could
increase the Company’s ownership to 100% in 2013. In relation
to the step up acquisitions, the Company recorded an entry to reduce Redeemable
Noncontrolling Interests by $1,116. The amount paid to the employee
over fair value, $608, was recorded as a stock-based compensation
charge. The Company recorded a reduction of additional paid-in
capital of $1,029 representing the difference between the fair value of the
shares and the value of the Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests. The
amounts paid and to be paid will be tax deductible.
The
actual adjustments that the Company will ultimately make in analyzing the
allocation of purchase price to the fair value of the net assets acquired, will
depend on a number of factors, including additional information available at
such time, changes in market values, and changes in operation results between
the date of the unaudited financial statements and the effective date of
acquisition.
10
2009
Acquisitions
11
MDC PARTNERS INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Thousands
of United States Dollars, Unless Otherwise Stated Except Share and per Share
Amounts)
4.
Acquisitions – (continued)
On
December 31, 2009, the Company acquired an additional 3% interest in
VitroRobertson increasing its holdings from 79% to 82%. The purchase price
totaled $845 and was paid in cash. The Company recorded an entry to reduce
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests by $266. The amount paid to the employee
over fair value, $370, was recorded as a stock-based compensation charge. The
Company recorded a reduction of additional paid-in capital of $209 representing
the difference between the fair value of the shares and the value of the
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests. As this purchase was pursuant to the
exercise of an existing put/call option, no additional intangibles have been
recorded. The goodwill will be tax deductible.
On
December 1, 2009, the Company agreed to make an early payment to KBP Management
Partners LLC originally due in March 2010 pursuant to the purchase agreement
entered into in November 2007. The additional payment totaled $14,870, of which
$10,140 was paid in cash in December 2009, $4,215 was paid in March 2010 with
the balance due in March 2011, recorded as deferred acquisition consideration.
This additional payment was accounted for as additional goodwill. In addition,
pursuant to an existing phantom stock arrangement, a stock-based compensation
charge of $3,028 has been recorded for amounts paid by KBP Management Partners
to phantom equity holders. The goodwill will be tax deductible.
On
October 5, 2009, the Company purchased the remaining 6% outstanding interest in
CPB for an estimated fixed and contingent purchase price. The estimated purchase
price of $9,818 is included in deferred acquisition consideration and includes
$518 of fixed payments to be paid in 2013. The Company recorded a reduction of
$8,596 to Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests and $704 to additional paid in
capital. The fixed payments of $518 are allocated to identifiable intangibles
and will be amortized over three years.
On August
31, 2009, the Company, through HL Group, acquired a 51% interest in Attention
Partners LLC (“Attention”), a social media agency that further expands HL
Group’s business capabilities. At closing, the HL Group paid $1,000 and made a
capital contribution of $400 to Attention. In addition, HL Group recorded
estimated contingent payments totaling $1,313, of which $1,022 was paid in cash
in March 2010 with the balance due in 2010 as deferred acquisition
consideration. The allocation of the excess purchase consideration of this
acquisition to the fair value of the net assets acquired resulted in
identifiable intangibles of $544 (consisting primarily of customer lists and a
covenant not to compete) and goodwill of $3,057 representing the value of the
assembled workforce. The fair value of the noncontrolling interests not acquired
at the acquisition date was $2,431 based on the Company’s evaluation of the
Company being acquired, the purchase paid by the Company. The identified
intangibles will be amortized up to a three-year period in a manner represented
by the pattern in which the economic benefits of the customer
contracts/relationships are realized. The intangibles and goodwill are tax
deductible.
On July
1, 2009, the Company, through CPB, acquired 100% of the preferred shares and 52%
of the common shares of Crispin Porter & Bogusky Europe AB (formerly known
as “daddy”), a digital agency based in Sweden that has created a foothold in
Europe for CPB. At closing, CPB paid $3,052 plus an additional $50 deferred
payment. Also in December 2009, CPB called an additional 24% and made a payment
of 80% of the purchase price of $188. An additional amount of $50 is recorded as
deferred acquisition consideration. The Company has additional calls and the
noncontrolling owners have reciprocal puts on the remaining 24% of the common
shares, which are exercisable beginning January 2012. The current estimated cost
of these puts and calls is approximately $6,600 and has been recorded as
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests. The allocation of the excess purchase
consideration of this acquisition to the fair value of the net assets acquired
resulted in identifiable intangibles of $650 (consisting primarily of customer
lists and a covenant not to compete) and goodwill of $8,533 representing the
value of the assembled workforce. The identified intangibles will be amortized
up to a three-year period in a manner represented by the pattern in which the
economic benefits of the customer contracts/relationships are realized. The
intangibles and goodwill are not tax deductible. Accordingly, CPB recorded a
deferred tax liability of $221 representing the future tax benefits relating to
the amortization of the identified intangibles.
12
MDC
PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Thousands
of United States Dollars, Unless Otherwise Stated Except Share and per Share
Amounts)
4.
Acquisitions – (continued)
Effective
January 22, 2009, the Company acquired an additional 8.9% of equity interests in
HL Group, thereby increasing MDC’s ownership to 64.9%. The purchase price
totaled $1,100 and was paid in cash at closing. The Company recorded an entry to
reduce Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests, as this purchase was pursuant to the
early exercise of an existing put/call option. Accordingly, no additional
intangibles have been recorded. However, the amount of the purchase price will
be tax deductible.
Pro
forma Information
The
following unaudited pro forma results of operations of the Company for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 assume that the acquisition of the
operating assets of Team and IMS acquired as of the beginning of each year.
These unaudited pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of either the
actual results of operations that would have been achieved had the companies
been combined during these periods, or are they necessarily indicative of future
results of operations.
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
173,085
|
$
|
154,853
|
$
|
322,911
|
$
|
298,356
|
||||||||
Net
income (loss) attributable to MDC Partners Inc.
|
$
|
(5,236
|
)
|
$
|
1,493
|
$ |
(15,538
|
)
|
$
|
1,567
|
||||||
Income
(loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
– net income (loss) attributable to MDC Partners Inc.
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
$
|
0.05
|
$ |
(0.56
|
)
|
$
|
0.06
|
||||||
Diluted
– net income (loss) attributable to MDC Partners Inc.
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
$
|
0.05
|
$
|
(0.56
|
)
|
$
|
0.06
|
Net
Income Attributable to MDC Partners Inc. and
Transfers
(to) from the Noncontrolling Interest
Three Months
Ended June 30,
2010
|
Six Months
Ended June 30,
2010
|
|||||||
Net
Loss attributable to MDC Partners Inc.
|
$
|
(5,805
|
)
|
$
|
(15,991
|
)
|
||
Transfers
(to) from the noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
||||||
Decrease
in MDC Partners Inc. paid-in capital for purchase of equity interests in
excess of Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
|
(58
|
)
|
(1,696
|
)
|
||||
Decrease
in MDC Partners Inc. paid-in-capital from issuance of profits
interests
|
|
—
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|||
Net
transfers (to) from noncontrolling interest
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
$
|
(1,856
|
)
|
||
Change
from net income attributable to MDC Partners Inc. and transfers (to) from
noncontrolling interest
|
$
|
(5,863
|
)
|
$
|
(17,847
|
)
|
5.
Accrued and Other
Liabilities
At June
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, accrued and other liabilities included amounts
due to noncontrolling interest holders, for their share of profits, which will
be distributed within the next twelve months of $3,411 and $4,058,
respectively.
6.
Discontinued
Operations
In June
2010, the Company discontinued a start up called Fearless Progression LLC
(“Fearless”). As a result, the Company wrote off its investment in
Fearless of $710. The Company has classified this entity’s results as
discontinued operations.
In
December 2008, the Company entered into negotiations to sell certain remaining
assets in Bratskeir to management. This transaction was completed in
April 2009. As a result of this transaction, the Company has
classified this entity’s results as discontinued
operations. Bratskeir’s results of operations, net of income tax
benefits, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 was a loss of $108
and $361, respectively.
13
Included
in discontinued operations in the Company’s consolidated statements of
operations for the three and six months ended June 30, were the
following:
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2010
|
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2009
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2010
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2009
|
|||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
481
|
||||||||
Operating
loss
|
$
|
(808
|
) |
$
|
(167
|
) |
$
|
(979
|
) |
$
|
(549
|
) | ||||
Other
expense
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||||||
Net
loss from discontinued operations attributable to MDC Partners Inc., net
of taxes
|
$
|
(647
|
) |
$
|
(108
|
) |
$
|
(647
|
) |
$
|
(361
|
) |
Total
comprehensive loss and its components were:
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Net
income (loss) for the period
|
$
|
(3,819
|
)
|
$
|
1,062
|
$
|
(13,037
|
)
|
$
|
1,472
|
||||||
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
||||||||||||||||
Foreign
currency cumulative translation adjustment
|
(959
|
)
|
1,904
|
$ |
457
|
70
|
||||||||||
Comprehensive
loss
|
(4,778
|
)
|
2,966
|
(12,580
|
)
|
1,542
|
||||||||||
Comprehensive
income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interest
|
(1,985
|
)
|
(996
|
)
|
(2,951
|
)
|
(1,372
|
)
|
||||||||
Comprehensive
loss attributable to MDC Partners Inc.
|
$
|
(6,763
|
)
|
$
|
1,970
|
$
|
(15,531
|
)
|
$
|
170
|
8.
Short-Term Debt, Long-Term Debt
and Convertible Debentures
Debt
consists of:
June
30,
2010
|
December 31,
2009
|
|||||||
Revolving
credit facility
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||
11%
Senior Notes due 2016
|
290,000
|
225,000
|
||||||
Original
issue discount
|
(7,219
|
)
|
(10,291
|
)
|
||||
Notes
payable and other bank loans
|
1,800
|
1,800
|
||||||
284,581
|
216,509
|
|||||||
Obligations
under capital leases
|
1,561
|
1,437
|
||||||
286,142
|
217,946
|
|||||||
Less:
|
||||||||
Current
portions
|
1,502
|
1,456
|
||||||
Long
term portion
|
$
|
284,640
|
$
|
216,490
|
MDC
Financing Agreement and Senior Notes
Issuance
of 11% Senior Notes
On
October 23, 2009, the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, as guarantors,
issued and sold $225,000 aggregate principal amount of 11% Senior Notes due 2016
(the “11% Notes”). The 11% Notes bear interest at a rate of 11% per annum,
accruing from October 23, 2009. Interest is payable semiannually in arrears in
cash on May 1 and November 1 of each year, beginning on May 1, 2010. The 11%
Notes will mature on November 1, 2016, unless earlier redeemed or repurchased.
The Company received net proceeds before expenses of $208,881, which included an
original issue discount of approximately 4.7% or $10,494, and underwriter fees
of $5,624. The 11% Notes were sold in a private placement in reliance on
exemptions from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The
Company used the net proceeds of this offering to repay the outstanding balance
and terminate its prior Fortress Financing Agreement, and redeemed its
outstanding 8% C$45,000 convertible debentures on November 26,
2009.
On May
14, 2010, the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, as guarantors
issued and sold $65,000 aggregate principal amount of 11% Senior Notes due
2016. The additional notes were issued under the Indenture governing
the 11% notes and treated as a single series with the original 11% notes. The
additional notes were sold in a private placement in reliance on exceptions from
registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Company received
net proceeds before expenses of $67,208, which included an original issue
premium of $2,600, and underwriter fees of $392. The Company used the net
proceeds of the offering to repay the outstanding balance under the Company’s
revolving credit facility described elsewhere herein, and for general corporate
purposes, including acquisitions.
14
The
Company may, at its option, redeem the 11% Notes (including the additional
notes) in whole at any time or in part, on and after November 1, 2013 at a
redemption price of 105.500% of the principal amount thereof. If redeemed during
the twelve-month period beginning on November 1, 2014, at a redemption price of
102.750% of the principal amount thereof or if redeemed during the twelve-month
period beginning on or after November 1, 2015 at a redemption price of 100% of
the principal amount thereof. Prior to November 1, 2013, the Company may, at its
option, redeem some or all of the 11% Notes at a price equal to 100% of the
principal amount of the Notes plus a “make whole” premium and accrued and unpaid
interest. The Company may also redeem, at its option, prior to November 1, 2012,
up to 35% of the 11% Notes with the proceeds from one or more equity offerings
at a redemption price of 111% of the principal amount thereof. If the Company
experiences certain kinds of changes of control (as defined in the Indenture),
holders of the 11% Notes may require the Company to repurchase any 11% Notes
held by them at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount of the 11% Notes
plus accrued and unpaid interest. The indenture governing the 11%
Notes contains certain events of default and restrictive covenants which are
customary with respect to non-investment grade debt securities, including
limitations on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, dividends, sales of
assets and transactions with affiliates.
In
connection with these transactions, the Company wrote-off $323 of deferred
financing costs relating to its prior convertible debentures in December
2009.
The fair
value for the 11% Senior Notes was $308,050 as of June 30,
2010.
15
MDC
PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Thousands
of United States Dollars, Unless Otherwise Stated Except Share and per Share
Amounts)
8.
Bank Debt, Long-Term Debt and Convertible Notes
– (continued)
New
Credit Facility
On
October 23, 2009, the Company and its subsidiaries entered into a new $75,000
five year senior secured revolving credit facility (the “WF Credit Agreement”)
with Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC, as agent, and the lenders from time to time
party thereto. The WF Credit Agreement replaced the Company’s existing $185,000
senior secured financing agreement with Fortress Credit Corp., as collateral
agent, and Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc., as administrative agent. Advances under
the WF Credit Agreement bear interest as follows: (a)(i) LIBOR Rate Loans bear
interest at the LIBOR Rate and (ii) Base Rate Loans bear interest at the Base
Rate, plus (b) an applicable margin. The initial applicable margin for borrowing
is 3.00% in the case of Base Rate Loans and 3.25% in the case of LIBOR Rate
Loans. The applicable margin may be reduced subject to the Company achieving
certain trailing twelve month earning levels, as defined. In addition to paying
interest on outstanding principal under the WF Credit Agreement, the Company is
required to pay an unused revolver fee to the lender under the WF Credit
Agreement in respect of unused commitments thereunder.
The WF
Credit Agreement is guaranteed by all of the Company’s present and future
subsidiaries, other than immaterial subsidiaries (as defined) and is secured by
all of the assets of the Company. The WF Credit Agreement includes covenants
that, among other things, restrict the Company’s ability and the ability of its
subsidiaries to incur or guarantee additional indebtedness; pay dividends on or
redeem or repurchase the capital stock of MDC; make certain types of
investments; impose limitations on dividends or other amounts from the Company’s
subsidiaries; incur certain liens, sell or otherwise dispose of certain assets;
enter into transactions with affiliates; enter into sale and leaseback
transactions; and consolidate or merge with or into, or sell substantially all
of the Company’s assets to, another person. These covenants are subject to a
number of important limitations and exceptions. The WF Credit Agreement also
contains financial covenants, including a senior leverage ratio, a fixed charge
coverage ratio and a minimum earnings level, as defined.
In
connection with these transactions, the Company incurred a termination fee of
$1,850 and wrote-off $2,240 of deferred financing costs relating to its prior
Fortress Financing Agreement in December 2009.
The
Company is currently in compliance with all of the terms and conditions of its
WF Credit Agreement, and management believes, based on its current financial
projections, that the Company will be in compliance with the covenants over the
next twelve months. At June 30, 2010, the weighted average interest
rate was 6.0%.
Prior
Financing Agreement
The Prior
Fortress Financing Agreement consisted of a $55,000 revolving credit facility, a
$60,000 term loan and a $70,000 delayed draw term loan. Interest payable under
the Financing Agreement was as follows: (a) LIBOR Rate Loans bear interest at
applicable interbank rates and Reference Rate Loans bear interest at the rate of
interest publicly announced by the Reference Bank in New York, New York, plus
(b) a percentage spread ranging from 0% to a maximum of 4.75% depending on the
type of loan and the Company’s Senior Leverage Ratio.
Effective
October 23, 2009, the Company repaid all outstanding amounts under the Fortress
Financing Agreement.
8%
Convertible Unsecured Subordinated Debentures
On June
28, 2005, the Company completed an offering in Canada of convertible unsecured
subordinated debentures amounting to $36,723 (C$45,000) (the “Debentures”). The
Debentures bore interest at an annual rate of 8.00% payable semi-annually, in
arrears, on June 30 and December 31 of each year.
The
Company repaid the Debentures on November 26, 2009.
16
9.
|
Total Equity
|
During
the six months ended June 30, 2010, Class A share capital increased by
$1,497, as the Company issued 261,866 shares related to vested restricted stock,
and 71,553 shares related to the exercise of outstanding stock appreciation
rights and 5,350 related to the exercise of options. During the six
months ended June 30, 2010, “Additional paid-in capital” decreased by $2,342
related to the vested restricted stock and stock appreciation rights, and $1,886
related to changes in ownership not resulting in change of control, and by $507
related to changes in put options (Note 2 and Note 13), and dividends accrued
and paid of $2,989 offset by $5,039 related to an increase from stock-based
compensation that was expensed during the same period.
In June
2010, the Company purchased and retired 86,598 Class A shares for $896 from
employees in connection with the required tax withholding resulting from the
vesting of shares of restricted stock and stock appreciation
rights.
Total
equity increased $24,619, which is comprised of a $41,212 increase in
noncontrolling interests related to acquisitions, an increase in stock-based
compensation of $5,039, a decrease in accumulated other comprehensive loss of
$460 and an exercise of stock options of $50, a reduction of subscriptions
receivable of $124, offset in part by a net loss attributable to MDC Partners of
$15,991, dividends accrued and paid of $2,989, $1,886 related to changes in
ownership not resulting in change of control, $896 of treasury stock purchases
and changes in put options of $507.
10.
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
Effective
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted guidance regarding accounting for Fair
Value Measurements, for financial assets and liabilities. This guidance defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands the
related disclosure requirements. The statement indicates, among other things,
that a fair value measurement assumes a transaction to sell an asset or transfer
a liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the
absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or
liability.
In order
to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, the
guidance establishes a hierarchy for observable and unobservable inputs used to
measure fair value into three broad levels, which are described
below:
|
•
|
Level 1:
Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are
accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair
value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1
inputs.
|
•
|
Level 2:
Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on
active markets, but corroborated by market
data.
|
•
|
Level 3:
Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is
available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3
inputs.
|
In
determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize
the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the
extent possible as well as considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment
of fair value.
On a
nonrecurring basis, the Company uses fair value measures when analyzing asset
impairment. Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangible assets are
reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If it is determined
such indicators are present and the review indicates that the assets will not be
fully recoverable, based on undiscounted estimated cash flows over the remaining
amortization periods, their carrying values are reduced to estimated fair value.
Measurements based on undiscounted cash flows are considered to be level 3
inputs. During the fourth quarter of each year, the Company evaluates goodwill
and indefinite-lived intangibles for impairment at the reporting unit level. For
each acquisition, the Company performed a detailed review to identify intangible
assets and a valuation is performed for all such identified assets. The Company
used several market participant measurements to determine estimated value. This
approach includes consideration of similar and recent transactions, as well as
utilizing discounted expected cash flow methodologies. The amounts allocated to
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisitions were determined
using level 3 inputs. Fair value for property and equipment was based on other
observable transactions for similar property and equipment. Accounts receivable
represents the best estimate of balances that will ultimately be collected,
which is based in part on allowance for doubtful accounts reserve criteria and
an evaluation of the specific receivable balances.
The
following table presents changes in Deferred Acquisition
Consideration.
|
||||
Fair
Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs
|
||||
(Level
3)
|
||||
Beginning
Balance as of January 1, 2010
|
$ | 30,645 | ||
Payments
|
(20,281 | ) | ||
Grants
|
52,015 | |||
Redemption
value adjustments
|
1,589 | |||
Ending
Balance as of June 30, 2010
|
$ | 63,968 |
11.
|
Other Income
(Expense)
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
(56
|
)
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
$
|
(22
|
)
|
|||||
Foreign
currency transaction gain (loss)
|
(231
|
)
|
(2,491
|
)
|
(907
|
)
|
116
|
|||||||||
Gain
(loss) on sale of assets
|
(56
|
)
|
6
|
13
|
(5
|
)
|
||||||||||
$
|
(287
|
)
|
$
|
(2,541
|
)
|
$
|
(900
|
)
|
$
|
89
|
12.
|
Segmented
Information
|
As a
result of changing client demand and the Company’s focus on driving return on
marketing investment, the Company changed its segment reporting to conform it
more closely with how the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) and management
are building and managing the Company’s business segments. This will simplify
the Company’s financial reporting and make its results more consistent with the
current manner of how the CODM and the Board of Directors view the business. The
Company is focused on expanding its capabilities in database marketing and data
analytics in order to position the Company for future business development
efforts and revenue growth.
17
MDC
PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Thousands
of United States Dollars, Unless Otherwise Stated Except Share and per Share
Amounts)
12.
Segmented Information
– (continued)
In order
to position this strategic focus along the lines of how the CODM and management
will base their business decisions, the Company has now reorganized its segment
reporting. Decisions regarding allocation of resources are made and will be made
based not only on the individual operating results of the subsidiaries but also
on the overall performance of the reportable segments. These reportable segments
are the aggregation of various reporting segments. The Company changed to the
current presentation during the fourth quarter of 2009 and all prior periods
have been recast.
The
Company reports in two segments plus corporate. The segments are as
follows:
•
|
The
Strategic Marketing
Services segment includes Crispin Porter & Bogusky and
kirshenbaum bond senecal + partners among others. This segment consists of
integrated marketing consulting services firms that offer a full
complement of marketing consulting services including advertising and
media, marketing communications including direct marketing, public
relations, corporate communications, market research, corporate identity
and branding, interactive marketing and sales promotion. Each of the
entities within the Strategic Marketing Services Group share similar
economic characteristics, specifically related to the nature of their
respective services, the manner in which the services are provided and the
similarity of their respective customers. Due to the similarities in these
businesses, they exhibit similar long term financial performance and have
been aggregated together.
|
•
|
The
Performance Marketing
Services segment includes our firms that provide consumer insights
to satisfy the growing need for targetable, measurable solutions or cost
effective means of driving return on marketing investment. These services
interface directly with the consumer of a client’s product or service.
Such services include the design, development, research and implementation
of consumer service and direct marketing initiatives. Each of the entities
within the Performance Marketing Services Group share similar economic
characteristics specifically related to the nature of their respective
services, the manner in which the services are provided, and the
similarity of their respective customers. Due to the similarities in these
businesses, the services provided to the customer exhibit similar long
term financial performance and have been aggregated
together.
|
The
significant accounting polices of these segments are the same as those described
in the summary of significant accounting policies included in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements. The Company continues to evaluate its
Corporate Group and the services provided by the Corporate Group to the
operating segments. The Company has determined that additional amounts should be
allocated to the operating segments based on additional services provided. The
Company will continue to evaluate the services and amount of time spent directly
on the operating segments business operations, and adjust
accordingly.
18
The
significant accounting policies of these segments are the same as those
described in the summary of significant accounting policies included in the
notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Summary
financial information concerning the Company’s operating segments is shown in
the following tables:
(thousands
of United States dollars)
Strategic
Marketing
Services
|
Performance
Marketing
Services
|
Corporate
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
106,980
|
$
|
63,009
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
169,989
|
||||||||
Cost
of services sold
|
71,436
|
45,330
|
—
|
116,766
|
||||||||||||
Office
and general expenses
|
20,929
|
12,634
|
5,547
|
39,110
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
4,238
|
3,707
|
94
|
8,039
|
||||||||||||
Operating
Profit/(Loss)
|
10,377
|
1,338
|
(5,641
|
)
|
6,074
|
|||||||||||
Other
Income (Expense):
|
||||||||||||||||
Other
expense, net
|
(287
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Interest
expense, net
|
(8,368
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Loss from
continuing operations before income taxes, equity in
affiliates
|
(2,581
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
552
|
|||||||||||||||
Loss
from continuing operations before equity in affiliates
|
(3,133
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Equity
in loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
(39
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Loss
from continuing operations
|
(3,172
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Loss
from discontinued operations attributable to MDC Partners Inc., net of
taxes
|
(647
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
(3,819
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Net
income attributable to the noncontrolling interests
|
(1,321
|
)
|
(665
|
)
|
—
|
(1,986
|
)
|
|||||||||
Net
loss attributable to MDC Partners Inc.
|
$
|
(5,805
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Non
cash stock based compensation
|
$
|
1,078
|
$
|
399
|
$
|
1,411
|
$
|
2,888
|
||||||||
Supplemental
Segment Information:
|
||||||||||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
$
|
1,361
|
$
|
1,429
|
$
|
168
|
$
|
2,958
|
||||||||
Goodwill
and intangibles
|
$
|
314,326
|
$
|
158,379
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
472,705
|
||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
456,637
|
$
|
270,215
|
$
|
65,134
|
$
|
791,986
|
19
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2009
(thousands
of United States dollars)
Strategic
Marketing
Services
|
Performance
Marketing
Services
|
Corporate
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
88,248
|
$
|
46,634
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
134,882
|
||||||||
Cost
of services sold
|
52,760
|
35,478
|
—
|
88,238
|
||||||||||||
Office
and general expenses
|
18,517
|
7,517
|
4,139
|
30,173
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
5,480
|
2,043
|
81
|
7,604
|
||||||||||||
Operating
Profit/(Loss)
|
11,491
|
1,596
|
(4,220
|
)
|
8,867
|
|||||||||||
Other
Income (Expense):
|
||||||||||||||||
Other
expense, net
|
(2,541
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Interest
expense, net
|
(3,653
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Income from
continuing operations before income taxes, equity in
affiliates
|
2,673
|
|||||||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
1,608
|
|||||||||||||||
Income
from continuing operations before equity in affiliates
|
1,065
|
|||||||||||||||
Equity
in earnings of non-consolidated affiliates
|
105
|
|||||||||||||||
Income
from continuing operations
|
1,170
|
|||||||||||||||
Loss
from discontinued operations attributable to MDC Partners Inc., net of
taxes
|
(108
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
1,062
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
income attributable to the noncontrolling interests
|
(978
|
)
|
(5)
|
—
|
(983
|
)
|
||||||||||
Net
income attributable to MDC Partners Inc.
|
$
|
79
|
||||||||||||||
Non
cash stock based compensation
|
$
|
371
|
$
|
184
|
$
|
1,490
|
$
|
2,045
|
||||||||
Supplemental
Segment Information:
|
||||||||||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
$
|
676
|
$
|
540
|
$
|
41
|
$
|
1,257
|
||||||||
Goodwill
and intangibles
|
$
|
221,468
|
$
|
57,954
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
279,422
|
||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
357,067
|
$
|
120,464
|
$
|
66,749
|
$
|
544,280
|
20
Six Months Ended June 30,
2010
(thousands
of United States dollars)
Strategic
Marketing
Services
|
Performance
Marketing
Services
|
Corporate
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
198,505
|
$
|
107,666
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
306,171
|
||||||||
Cost
of services sold
|
133,049
|
80,686
|
—
|
213,735
|
||||||||||||
Office
and general expenses
|
41,257
|
22,148
|
10,330
|
73,735
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
7,539
|
6,146
|
187
|
13,872
|
||||||||||||
Operating
Profit/(Loss)
|
16,660
|
(1,314
|
)
|
(10,517
|
)
|
4,829
|
||||||||||
Other
Income (Expense):
|
||||||||||||||||
Other
expense, net
|
(900
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Interest
expense, net
|
(15,375
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Loss from
continuing operations before income taxes, equity in
affiliates
|
(11,446
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
801
|
|||||||||||||||
Loss
from continuing operations before equity in affiliates
|
(12,247
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Equity
in loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
(143
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Loss
from continuing operations
|
(12,390
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Loss
from discontinued operations attributable to MDC Partners Inc., net of
taxes
|
(647
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
(13,037
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Net
income attributable to the noncontrolling interests
|
(2,248
|
)
|
(706
|
)
|
—
|
(2,954
|
)
|
|||||||||
Net
loss attributable to MDC Partners Inc.
|
$
|
(15,991
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Non
cash stock based compensation
|
$
|
2,831
|
$
|
765
|
$
|
2,759
|
$
|
6,355
|
||||||||
Supplemental
Segment Information:
|
||||||||||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
$
|
2,966
|
$
|
2,463
|
$
|
291
|
$
|
5,720
|
||||||||
Goodwill
and intangibles
|
$
|
314,326
|
$
|
158,379
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
472,705
|
||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
456,637
|
$
|
270,215
|
$
|
65,134
|
$
|
791,986
|
21
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2009
(thousands
of United States dollars)
Strategic
Marketing
Services
|
Performance
Marketing
Services
|
Corporate
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
172,711
|
$
|
88,909
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
261,620
|
||||||||
Cost
of services sold
|
105,440
|
68,677
|
—
|
174,117
|
||||||||||||
Office
and general expenses
|
38,129
|
15,145
|
8,051
|
61,325
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
10,852
|
4,170
|
175
|
15,197
|
||||||||||||
Operating
Profit/(Loss)
|
18,290
|
917
|
(8,226
|
)
|
10,981
|
|||||||||||
Other
Income (Expense):
|
||||||||||||||||
Other
income, net
|
89
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest
expense, net
|
(7,212
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Income from
continuing operations before income taxes, equity in
affiliates
|
3,858
|
|||||||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
2,223
|
|||||||||||||||
Income
from continuing operations before equity in affiliates
|
1,635
|
|||||||||||||||
Equity
in earnings of non-consolidated affiliates
|
198
|
|||||||||||||||
Income
from continuing operations
|
1,833
|
|||||||||||||||
Loss
from discontinued operations attributable to MDC Partners Inc., net of
taxes
|
(361
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Net
Income
|
1,472
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
income attributable to the noncontrolling interests
|
(1,654
|
)
|
289
|
(1,365
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Net
income attributable to MDC Partners Inc.
|
$
|
107
|
||||||||||||||
Non
cash stock based compensation
|
$
|
804
|
$
|
374
|
$
|
2,764
|
$
|
3,942
|
||||||||
Supplemental
Segment Information:
|
||||||||||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
$
|
1,448
|
$
|
579
|
$
|
60
|
$
|
2,087
|
||||||||
Goodwill
and intangibles
|
$
|
221,468
|
$
|
57,954
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
279,422
|
||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
357,067
|
$
|
120,464
|
$
|
66,749
|
$
|
544,280
|
22
A summary
of the Company’s revenue by geographic area, based on the location in which the
services originated, is set forth in the following table:
|
United
States
|
Canada
|
Other
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Revenue
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||||||
2010
|
$
|
143,299
|
$
|
22,427
|
$
|
4,263
|
$
|
169,989
|
||||||||
2009
|
$
|
114,897
|
$
|
18,974
|
$
|
1,011
|
$
|
134,882
|
||||||||
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||||||
2010
|
$
|
255,448
|
$
|
42,472
|
$
|
8,251
|
$
|
306,171
|
||||||||
2009
|
$
|
222,938
|
$
|
36,539
|
$
|
2,143
|
$
|
261,620
|
13.
Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees
Deferred Acquisition
Consideration. In addition to the consideration paid by the Company in
respect of certain of its acquisitions at closing, additional consideration may
be payable, or may be potentially payable based on the achievement of certain
threshold levels of earnings. See Note 2 and Note 4.
Put Options. Owners of
interests in certain subsidiaries have the right in certain circumstances to
require the Company to acquire the remaining ownership interests held by them.
The owners’ ability to exercise any such “put option” right is subject to the
satisfaction of certain conditions, including conditions requiring notice in
advance of exercise. In addition, these rights cannot be exercised prior to
specified staggered exercise dates. The exercise of these rights at their
earliest contractual date would result in obligations of the Company to fund the
related amounts during the period 2010 to 2018. It is not determinable, at this
time, if or when the owners of these rights will exercise all or a portion of
these rights.
The
amount payable by the Company in the event such rights are exercised is
dependent on various valuation formulas and on future events, such as the
average earnings of the relevant subsidiary through the date of exercise, the
growth rate of the earnings of the relevant subsidiary during that period, and,
in some cases, the currency exchange rate at the date of payment.
Management
estimates, assuming that the subsidiaries owned by the Company at June 30, 2010,
perform over the relevant future periods at their trailing
twelve-months earnings levels, that these rights, if all exercised, could
require the Company, in future periods, to pay an aggregate amount of
approximately $29,860 to the owners of such rights to acquire such ownership
interests in the relevant subsidiaries. Of this amount, the Company is entitled,
at its option, to fund approximately $2,743 by the issuance of share capital. In
addition, the Company is obligated under similar put option rights to pay an
aggregate amount of approximately $10,425 only upon termination of such owner’s
employment with the applicable subsidiary. The ultimate amount payable relating
to these transactions will vary because it is dependent on the future results of
operations of the subject businesses and the timing of when these rights are
exercised.
Natural Disasters. Certain of
the Company’s operations are located in regions of the United States and
Caribbean which typically are subject to hurricanes. During the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, these operations did not incur any costs
related to damages resulting from hurricanes.
Guarantees. In connection
with certain dispositions of assets and/or businesses in 2001 and 2003, the
Company has provided customary representations and warranties whose terms range
in duration and may not be explicitly defined. The Company has also retained
certain liabilities for events occurring prior to sale, relating to tax,
environmental, litigation and other matters. Generally, the Company has
indemnified the purchasers in the event that a third party asserts a claim
against the purchaser that relates to a liability retained by the Company. These
types of indemnification guarantees typically extend for a number of
years.
In
connection with the 2003 sale of the Company’s investment in CDI, the amounts of
indemnification guarantees were limited to the total sale price of approximately
$84,000. For the remainder, the Company’s potential liability for these
indemnifications are not subject to a limit as the underlying agreements do not
always specify a maximum amount and the amounts are dependent upon the outcome
of future contingent events.
Historically,
the Company has not made any significant indemnification payments under such
agreements and no amount has been accrued in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements with respect to these indemnification guarantees. The
Company continues to monitor the conditions that are subject to guarantees and
indemnifications to identify whether it is probable that a loss has occurred,
and would recognize any such losses under any guarantees or indemnifications in
the period when those losses are probable and estimable.
For
guarantees and indemnifications entered into after January 1, 2003, in
connection with the sale of the Company’s investment in CDI, the Company has
estimated the fair value of its liability, which was insignificant.
Legal Proceedings. The
Company’s operating entities are involved in legal proceedings of various types.
While any litigation contains an element of uncertainty, the Company has no
reason to believe that the outcome of such proceedings or claims will have a
material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of
the Company.
23
Commitments. At June
30, 2010, the Company had issued $4,980 of undrawn outstanding letters of
credit.
14. New Accounting
Pronouncements
In April
2010, the FASB issues ASU 2010-17, “Revenue Recognition-Milestone
Method.” ASU 2010-17 provides guidance on the criteria
that should be met for determining whether the milestone method of revenue
recognition is appropriate. A vendor can recognize consideration that
is contingent upon achievement of a milestone in its entirety as revenue in the
period in which the milestone is achieved only if the milestone meets all
criteria to be considered substantive. The amendments in ASU 2010-17
are effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years,
and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15,
2010. The adoption will not have an impact on our financial
statements.
In April
2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-13, "Compensation - Stock
Compensation Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a
Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying
Equity Security Trades." ASU 2010-13 provides amendments to clarify that an
employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the
currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity's equity
securities trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a
market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not
classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The
amendments in ASU 2010-13 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods
within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The adoption
of this standard will not have an effect on our results of operation or our
financial position.
In
February 2010, The FASB issued an additional Accounting Standards Update on
Subsequent Events to clarify the updated guidance issued in May
2009. This Guidance clarifies that SEC filers must evaluate
subsequent events through the date the financial statements are issued. However,
an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent
events have been evaluated. The amendment is effective June 15,
2010. The adoption did not have an impact on our financial
statements.
In
January 2010, the FASB issued amended guidance to enhance disclosure
requirements related to fair value measurements. The amended guidance for Level
1 and Level 2 fair value measurements is effective January 1, 2010. The
amended guidance for Level 3 fair value measurements will be effective for
January 1, 2011. The guidance requires disclosures of amounts and reasons
for transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 recurring fair value
measurements as well as additional information related to activities in the
reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements. The guidance expanded the
disclosures related to the level of disaggregation of assets and liabilities and
information about inputs and valuation techniques. The adoption of the guidance
for Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements did not have a material impact
on our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements. The adoption of
the guidance related to Level 3 fair value measurements will not have a
significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In
January 2010, the FASB issued an Accounts Standards Update on
Consolidation — Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of
a Subsidiary — A Scope Clarification. This Guidance clarifies the
scope of the decrease in ownership provisions and expands the disclosure
requirements about deconsolidation of a subsidiary or de-recognition of a
group of assets. It is effective beginning in the first interim annual reporting
period ending on or after December 15, 2009. The adoption did not have an impact
on our financial statements.
In
January 2010, the FASB issued Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures — Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.
This Guidance requires new disclosures and clarifies certain existing disclosure
requirements about fair value measurements. It requires a reporting entity to
disclose significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value
measurements, to describe the reasons for the transfers and to present
separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements for
fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs. This Guidance is
effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15,
2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and
settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements,
which is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2010; early adoption is permitted. The adoption did not have a
material effect on our financial statements.
In
October 2009, the FASB issued revised guidance on the topic of
Multiple — Deliverable Revenue Arrangements. The revised guidance
amends certain accounting for revenue with multiple deliverables. In particular
when vendor specific objective evidence or third party evidence for deliverables
in an arrangement cannot be determined, the revised guidance allows use of a
best estimate of the selling price to allocate the arrangement consideration
among them. This guidance is effective for the first quarter of 2011, with early
adoption permitted. The adoption will not have a material impact on our
financial statements.
24
15.
Subsequent Events
On July
30, 2010, the Company completed the acquisition of 60% of the equity interests
in Relevent Partners LLC (“Relevent”) in exchange
for a purchase price equal to approximately $11.4 million cash at closing, plus
additional contingent payments that are based on actual financial results from
2010 to 2015. Relevent is a full service marketing, special events, production
and promotions company that builds brands with consumers through experiential
lifestyle, entertainment and relationship marketing programs. The
acquisition of Relevent is expected to enhance MDC’s experiential marketing
platform.
25
Item 2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Unless
otherwise indicated, references to the “Company” mean MDC Partners Inc. and its
subsidiaries, and references to a fiscal year means the Company’s year
commencing on January 1 of that year and ending December 31 of that
year (e.g., fiscal 2009 means the period beginning January 1, 2009, and
ending December 31, 2009).
The
Company reports its financial results in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles (“GAAP”) of the United States of America (“US GAAP”).
However, the Company has included certain non-US GAAP financial measures and
ratios, which it believes, provide useful information to both management and
readers of this report in measuring the financial performance and financial
condition of the Company. One such term is “organic revenue” which means growth
in revenues from sources other than acquisitions or foreign exchange impacts.
These measures do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by US GAAP and,
therefore, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other
publicly traded companies, nor should they be construed as an alternative to
other titled measures determined in accordance with US GAAP.
The
following discussion focuses on the operating performance of the Company for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, and the financial condition
of the Company as of June 30, 2010. This analysis should be read in conjunction
with the interim condensed consolidated financial statements presented in this
interim report and the annual audited consolidated financial statements and
Management’s Discussion and Analysis presented in the Annual Report to
Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2009 as reported on
Form 10-K. All amounts are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise
stated.
26
Executive
Summary
The
Company’s objective is to create shareholder value by building market-leading
subsidiaries and affiliates that deliver innovative, value-added marketing
communications and strategic consulting services to their clients. Management
believes that shareholder value is maximized with an operating philosophy of
“Perpetual Partnership” with proven committed industry leaders in marketing
communications.
MDC
manage the business by monitoring several financial and non-financial
performance indicators. The key indicators that we review focus on the areas of
revenues and operating expenses and capital expenditures. Revenue growth is
analyzed by reviewing the components and mix of the growth, including: growth by
major geographic location; existing growth by major reportable segment
(organic); growth from currency changes; and growth from
acquisitions.
MDC
conducts its businesses through the Marketing Communications Group. Within the
Marketing Communications Group, there are two reportable operating segments:
Strategic Marketing Services and Performance Marking Services. In addition, MDC
has a “Corporate Group” which provides certain administrative, accounting,
financial and legal functions. Through our operating “partners”, MDC provides
advertising, consulting, customer relationship management, and specialized
communication services to clients throughout the United States, Canada, Europe,
and Jamaica.
The
operating companies earn revenue from agency arrangements in the form of
retainer fees or commissions; from short-term project arrangements in the form
of fixed fees or per diem fees for services; and from incentives or bonuses.
Additional information about revenue recognition appears in Note 2 of the Notes
to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
MDC
measures operating expenses in two distinct cost categories: cost of services
sold, and office and general expenses. Cost of services sold is primarily
comprised of employee compensation related costs and direct costs related
primarily to providing services. Office and general expenses are primarily
comprised of rent and occupancy costs and administrative service costs including
related employee compensation costs. Also included in operating expenses is
depreciation and amortization.
Because
we are a service business, we monitor these costs on a percentage of revenue
basis. Cost of services sold tends to fluctuate in conjunction with changes in
revenues, whereas office and general expenses and depreciation and amortization,
which are not directly related to servicing clients, tend to decrease as a
percentage of revenue as revenues increase because a significant portion of
these expenses are relatively fixed in nature.
We
measure capital expenses as either maintenance or investment related.
Maintenance capital expenses are primarily composed of general upkeep of our
office facilities and equipment that are required to continue to operate our
businesses. Investment capital expenses include expansion costs, the
build out of new capabilities, technology or call centers, or other growth
initiatives not related to the day to day upkeep of the existing
operations. Growth capital expenses are measured and approved based on the
expected return of the invested capital.
Certain
Factors Affecting Our Business
Acquisitions and Dispositions
. Our strategy includes acquiring ownership stakes in well-managed
businesses with strong reputations in the industry. We engaged in a number of
acquisition and disposal transactions during the 2009 to 2010 period, which
affected revenues, expenses, operating income and net income. Additional
information regarding material acquisitions is provided in Note 4 “Acquisitions”
and information on dispositions is provided in Note 6 “Discontinued Operations”
in the notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Foreign Exchange Fluctuations
. Our financial results and competitive position are affected by
fluctuations in the exchange rate between the US dollar and non-US dollars,
primarily the Canadian dollar. See also “Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk — Foreign Exchange.”
Seasonality
. Historically, with some exceptions, we generate the highest
quarterly revenues during the fourth quarter in each year. The fourth quarter
has historically been the period in the year in which the highest volumes of
media placements and retail related consumer marketing occur.
27
Results
of Operations:
For
the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
(thousands
of United States dollars)
Strategic
Marketing
Services
|
Performance
Marketing
Services
|
Corporate
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
106,980
|
$
|
63,009
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
169,989
|
||||||||
Cost
of services sold
|
71,436
|
45,330
|
—
|
116,766
|
||||||||||||
Office
and general expenses
|
20,929
|
12,634
|
5,547
|
39,110
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
4,238
|
3,707
|
94
|
8,039
|
||||||||||||
Operating
Profit/(Loss)
|
10,377
|
1,338
|
(5,641
|
)
|
6,074
|
|||||||||||
Other
Income (Expense):
|
||||||||||||||||
Other
expense, net
|
(287
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Interest
expense, net
|
(8,368
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Loss
from continuing operations before income taxes, equity in
affiliates
|
(2,581
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
552
|
|||||||||||||||
Loss
from continuing operations before equity in affiliates
|
(3,133
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Equity
in loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
(39
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Loss
from continuing operations
|
(3,172
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Loss
from discontinued operations attributable to MDC Partners Inc., net of
taxes
|
(647
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
(3,819
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Net
income attributable to the noncontrolling interests
|
(1,321
|
)
|
(665
|
)
|
—
|
(1,986
|
)
|
|||||||||
Net
loss attributable to MDC Partners Inc.
|
$
|
(5,805
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Non
cash stock based compensation
|
$
|
1,078
|
$
|
399
|
$
|
1,411
|
$
|
2,888
|
28
Results
of Operations:
For
the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
(thousands
of United States dollars)
Strategic
Marketing
Services
|
Performance
Marketing
Services
|
Corporate
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
88,248
|
$
|
46,634
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
134,882
|
||||||||
Cost
of services sold
|
52,760
|
35,478
|
—
|
88,238
|
||||||||||||
Office
and general expenses
|
18,517
|
7,517
|
4,139
|
30,173
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
5,480
|
2,043
|
81
|
7,604
|
||||||||||||
Operating
Profit/(Loss)
|
11,491
|
1,596
|
(4,220
|
)
|
8,867
|
|||||||||||
Other
Income (Expense):
|
||||||||||||||||
Other
expense, net
|
(2,541
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Interest
expense, net
|
(3,653
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Income
from continuing operations before income taxes, equity in
affiliates
|
2,673
|
|||||||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
1,608
|
|||||||||||||||
Income
from continuing operations before equity in affiliates
|
1,065
|
|||||||||||||||
Equity
in earnings of non-consolidated affiliates
|
105
|
|||||||||||||||
Income
from continuing operations
|
1,170
|
|||||||||||||||
Loss
from discontinued operations attributable to MDC Partners Inc., net of
taxes
|
(108
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
1,062
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interests
|
(978
|
)
|
(5
|
) |
—
|
(983
|
)
|
|||||||||
Net
income attributable to MDC Partners Inc.
|
$
|
79
|
||||||||||||||
Non
cash stock based compensation.
|
$
|
371
|
$
|
184
|
$
|
1,490
|
$
|
2,045
|
29
Results of
Operations:
For
the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
(thousands
of United States dollars)
Strategic
Marketing
Services
|
Performance
Marketing
Services
|
Corporate
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
198,505
|
$
|
107,666
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
306,171
|
||||||||
Cost
of services sold
|
133,049
|
80,686
|
—
|
213,735
|
||||||||||||
Office
and general expenses
|
41,257
|
22,148
|
10,330
|
73,735
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
7,539
|
6,146
|
187
|
13,872
|
||||||||||||
Operating
Profit/(Loss)
|
16,660
|
(1,314
|
)
|
(10,517
|
)
|
4,829
|
||||||||||
Other
Income (Expense):
|
||||||||||||||||
Other
expense, net
|
(900
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Interest
expense, net
|
(15,375
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Loss
from continuing operations before income taxes, equity in
affiliates
|
(11,446
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
801
|
|||||||||||||||
Loss
from continuing operations before equity in affiliates
|
(12,247
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Equity
in loss of non-consolidated affiliates
|
(143
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Loss
from continuing operations
|
(12,390
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Loss
from discontinued operations attributable to MDC Partners Inc., net of
taxes
|
(647
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
(13,037
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Net
income attributable to the noncontrolling interests
|
(2,248
|
)
|
(706
|
)
|
—
|
(2,954
|
)
|
|||||||||
Net
loss attributable to MDC Partners Inc.
|
$
|
(15,991
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Non
cash stock based compensation.
|
$
|
2,831
|
$
|
765
|
$
|
2,759
|
$
|
6,355
|
30
Results
of Operations:
For
the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
(thousands
of United States dollars)
Strategic
Marketing
Services
|
Performance
Marketing
Services
|
Corporate
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
172,711
|
$
|
88,909
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
261,620
|
||||||||
Cost
of services sold
|
105,440
|
68,677
|
—
|
174,117
|
||||||||||||
Office
and general expenses
|
38,129
|
15,145
|
8,051
|
61,325
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
10,852
|
4,170
|
175
|
15,197
|
||||||||||||
Operating
Profit/(Loss)
|
18,290
|
917
|
(8,226
|
)
|
10,981
|
|||||||||||
Other
Income (Expense):
|
||||||||||||||||
Other
income, net
|
89
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest
expense, net
|
(7,212
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Income
from continuing operations before income taxes, equity in
affiliates
|
3,858
|
|||||||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
2,223
|
|||||||||||||||
Income
from continuing operations before equity in affiliates
|
1,635
|
|||||||||||||||
Equity
in earnings of non-consolidated affiliates
|
198
|
|||||||||||||||
Income
from continuing operations
|
1,833
|
|||||||||||||||
Loss
from discontinued operations attributable to MDC Partners Inc., net of
taxes
|
(361
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
1,472
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interests
|
(1,654
|
)
|
289
|
(1,365
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Net
income attributable to MDC Partners Inc.
|
$
|
107
|
||||||||||||||
Non
cash stock based compensation.
|
$
|
804
|
$
|
374
|
$
|
2,764
|
$
|
3,942
|
31
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2010, Compared to Three Months Ended June 30,
2009
Revenue
was $170.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, representing an increase
of $35.1 million, or 26.0%, compared to revenue of $134.9 million for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009. This revenue increase related primarily to
acquisition growth of $25.3 million and organic growth of $7.2 million. In
addition, a weakening of the US Dollar, primarily versus the Canadian dollar
during the quarter ended June 30, 2010, resulted in increased revenues of $2.6
million.
The
operating profit for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 was $6.1 million compared
to operating profit of $8.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The
decrease in operating profit was primarily the result of an increase in
corporate operating expenses of $1.4 million, a decrease in operating profit of
$1.1 million in the Strategic Marketing Services segment and a decrease of $0.3
million within the Performance Marketing Services segment.
The loss
from continuing operations attributable to MDC Partners Inc. for the second
quarter of 2010 was $5.2 million, compared to income of $0.2 million in 2009.
This decrease in income of $5.4 million was primarily the result of an increase
in interest expense, net of $4.7 million, a decrease in operating profits of
$2.8 million, and increase in net income attributable to noncontrolling
interests of $1.0 million, a decrease from equity in earning of non-consolidated
affiliates of $0.1 million. These amounts were offset by a decrease
in other expense, net of $2.3 million and a decrease in income tax expense of
$1.1 million.
Marketing
Communications Group
Revenues
in the second quarter of 2010 attributable to the Marketing Communications
Group, which consists of two reportable segments — Strategic Marketing
Services and Performance Marketing Services, were $170.0 million compared to
$134.9 million in the second quarter of 2009, representing a year-over-year
increase of 26.0%.
The
components of the increase in revenue in 2010 are shown in the following
table:
Revenue
|
||||||||
|
$ 000’s
|
%
|
||||||
Quarter
ended June 30, 2009
|
$
|
134,882
|
—
|
|||||
Organic
|
7,209
|
5.3
|
%
|
|||||
Acquisitions
|
25,340
|
18.8
|
%
|
|||||
Foreign
exchange impact
|
2,558
|
1.9
|
%
|
|||||
Quarter
ended June 30, 2010
|
$
|
169,989
|
26.0
|
%
|
The
geographic mix in revenues was consistent between the second quarter of 2010 and
2009 and is demonstrated in the following table:
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
US
|
84
|
%
|
85
|
%
|
||||
Canada
|
13
|
%
|
14
|
%
|
||||
Other
|
3
|
%
|
1
|
%
|
The
operating profit of the Marketing Communications Group decreased by
approximately 10.5% to $11.7 million from $13.1 million. Operating margins
decreased by 2.8% and were 6.9% for 2010 compared to 9.7% for 2009. The decrease
in operating profit and operating margin was primarily attributable to an
increase in direct costs (excluding staff costs) as a percentage of revenues
from 14.4% in 2009 to 22.0% in 2010. Direct costs increased due to the
requirement that certain costs be included in both revenue and direct costs due
to the company acting as principle versus agent for certain client contracts.
Total staff costs increased $12.0 million; however, as a percentage of
revenue decreased from 59.2% in 2009 to 54.0% in 2010. General and
administrative costs increased as a percentage of revenue from 19.3% in 2009 to
19.7% in 2010.
Strategic
Marketing Services (“SMS”)
Revenues
attributable to Strategic Marketing Services in the second quarter of 2010 were
$107.0 million, compared to $88.2 million in the second quarter of 2009. The
year-over-year increase of $18.7 million or 21.2% was attributable primarily to
organic growth of $13.6 million as a result of net new business wins, and
acquisition growth of $3.7 million. A weakening of the US dollar versus the
Canadian dollar in 2010 compared to 2009 resulted in a $1.4 million increase in
revenues from the division’s Canadian-based operations.
32
The
operating profit of Strategic Marketing Services decreased by approximately 9.7%
to $10.4 million in the second quarter of 2010 from $11.5 million in the second
quarter of 2009. Operating margins decreased to 9.7% in 2010 from 13.0% in 2009.
Operating profit and margin decreased due primarily to increased direct costs
(excluding staff costs) as a percentage of revenue from 11.2% in 2009 to 19.4%
in 2010. In addition, total staff costs increased $7.3 million; however,
as a percentage of revenue decreased from 56.8% in 2009 to 53.8% in 2010.
General and administrative costs decreased as a percentage of revenue from 21.0%
in 2009 to 19.6% in 2010, due to the relatively fixed nature of these
costs.
Performance
Marketing Services
The
Performance Marketing Services segment generated revenues of $63.0 million for
the second quarter of 2010, an increase of $16.4 million, or 35.1% higher than
revenues of $46.6 million in the second quarter of 2009. The year over year
increase was attributed primarily to growth from acquisitions of $21.7 million.
In addition, a weakening of the US dollar verses the Canadian dollar in 2010
compared to 2009 resulted in a $1.1 million increase in revenues from the
division’s Canadian-based operations. These increases were offset by reduced
revenue of $6.4 million as a result of the reduction and delays of client
spending.
The
operating profit of Performance Marketing Services decreased by $0.3 million in
the second quarter of 2010 from $1.6 million in the second quarter of 2009 to
$1.3 million in the second quarter of 2010. Total direct costs (excluding staff
costs) increased $7.1 million and as a percentage of revenue increased from
20.7% in the second quarter of 2009 to 26.5% in the second quarter of 2010.
General and administrative costs increased as a percentage of revenue from 16.1%
in the second quarter of 2009 to 20.1% in the second quarter of 2010. The
increase as a percentage of revenue was due to reduced organic revenues on
relatively fixed costs within one of our operating units. Total staff costs as a
percentage of revenue decreased from 63.7% in the second quarter of 2009 to
54.4% in the second quarter of 2010. Depreciation and amortization
increased by $1.7 million due to the amortization of intangibles in connection
with the 2010 acquisitions.
Corporate
Operating
costs related to the Company’s Corporate operations totaled $5.6 million in the
second quarter of 2010 compared to $4.2 million in the second quarter of 2009.
This increase of $1.4 million was primarily related to increased compensation
and related costs of $0.5 million, travel, promotional and related costs of $0.7
million, and professional and other costs of $0.2 million.
Other
Income, Net
Other
income (expense) decreased to an expense of $0.3 million in the second quarter
of 2010 compared to an expense of $2.5 million in the second quarter of 2009.
The 2010 expense was primarily comprised of a foreign exchange loss of $0.3
million, compared to a loss of $2.5 million recorded in 2009.
Specifically, this unrealized loss was due primarily to the weakening in the US
dollar during 2010 and 2009 compared to the Canadian dollar primarily on its US
dollar denominated intercompany balances with its Canadian subsidiaries compared
to December 31, 2009.
Net
Interest Expense
Net
interest expense for the second quarter of 2010 was $8.4 million, an increase of
$4.7 million over the $3.7 million of net interest expense incurred during the
second quarter of 2009. Interest expense increased in 2010 due to higher average
outstanding debt in 2010, relating to the 11% senior notes issued in October
2009 and May 2010. Interest income was nominal in the second quarter of 2010 and
2009.
Income
Taxes
Income
tax expense was $1.6 million in the second quarter of 2009 compared to income
tax expense of $0.6 million for the second quarter of 2010. The Company’s
effective tax rate in 2010 and 2009 was substantially higher than the statutory
rate due to noncontrolling interest charges, offset by non-deductible stock
based compensation. In addition, the 2010 effective tax rate was higher
due to losses in certain tax jurisdictions where the benefits are not expected
to be realized.
The
Company’s US operating units are generally structured as limited liability
companies, which are treated as partnerships for tax purposes. The Company is
only taxed on its share of profits, while noncontrolling holders are responsible
for taxes on their share of the profits.
Equity
in Affiliates
Equity in
affiliates represents the income (losses) attributable to equity-accounted
affiliate operations. For the second quarter of 2010 the loss was nominal
compared to the second quarter of 2009 income of $0.1 million which was
recorded.
33
Noncontrolling
Interests
Net
income attributable to the noncontrolling interests was $2.0 million for the
second quarter of 2010, an increase of $1.0 million from the $1.0 million of
noncontrolling interest expense incurred during the second quarter of 2009,
primarily due to increased profitability of certain entities which are not
wholly owned.
Discontinued
Operations Attributable to MDC Partners Inc.
The loss
of $0.6 million, net of an income tax benefit of $0.3 million from discontinued
operations in 2010, resulted from the operating results and write-off of our
investment of Fearless, which was discontinued in the second quarter of
2010.
The loss,
net of an income tax benefit of $0.1 million from discontinued operations in
2009, resulted from the operating results of Clifford/Bratskeir Public Relations
LLC (“Bratskeir”), which was discontinued in 2008 with the completion of the
sale of Bratskeir’s remaining assets in April 2009.
As a
result, the Company has classified these operations as
discontinued.
Net Income (loss) attributable to MDC
Partners Inc.
As a
result of the foregoing, the net loss attributable to MDC Partners Inc. recorded
for the second quarter of 2010 was $5.8 million or a loss of $0.21 per diluted
share, compared to a nominal net income attributable to MDC Partners Inc. or
$0.01 per diluted share reported for the second quarter of 2009.
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2010, Compared to Six Months Ended June 30,
2009
Revenue
was $306.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, representing an
increase of $44.6 million, or 17.0%, compared to revenue of $261.6 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2009. This revenue increase related primarily to
acquisition growth of $31.6 million and organic growth of $6.8 million. In
addition, a weakening of the US Dollar, primarily versus the Canadian dollar
during the six months ended June 30, 2010, resulted in increased revenues of
$6.2 million.
The
operating profit for 2010 was $4.8 million, compared to operating profit of
$11.0 million for 2009. The decrease in operating profit was primarily the
result of a decrease in operating profit of $2.3 million in the Performance
Marketing Services segment and a decrease of $1.6 million within the Strategic
Marketing Services segment. In addition, Corporate operating expenses increased
by $2.3 million.
The loss
from continuing operations attributable to MDC Partners Inc. for the first six
months of 2010 was $15.3 million, compared to income of $0.5 million in 2009.
This decrease in income of $15.8 million was primarily the result of a decrease
in operating profits of $6.2 million, and an increase in interest expense, net
of $8.2 million, and an increase in net income attributable to noncontrolling
interests of $1.6 million, a decrease in other income, net of $1.0
million. These amounts were offset by a decrease in income tax expense of
$1.4 million.
Marketing
Communications Group
Revenues
in 2010 attributable to the Marketing Communications Group, which consists of
two reportable segments — Strategic Marketing Services and Performance
Marketing Services, were $306.2 million compared to $261.6 million in 2009,
representing a year-over-year increase of 17.0%.
The
components of the increase in revenue in 2010 are shown in the following
table:
Revenue
|
||||||||
|
$ 000’s
|
%
|
||||||
Six
months ended June 30, 2009
|
$
|
261,620
|
—
|
|||||
Organic
|
6,818
|
2.6
|
%
|
|||||
Acquisitions
|
31,578
|
12.1
|
%
|
|||||
Foreign
exchange impact
|
6,155
|
2.3
|
%
|
|||||
Six
months ended June 30, 2010
|
$
|
306,171
|
17.0
|
%
|
The
geographic mix in revenues was consistent between 2010 and 2009 and is
demonstrated in the following table:
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
US
|
83
|
%
|
85
|
%
|
||||
Canada
|
14
|
%
|
14
|
%
|
||||
Other
|
3
|
%
|
1
|
%
|
The
operating profit of the Marketing Communications Group decreased by
approximately 20.1% to $15.3 million in 2010 from $19.2 million in 2009.
Operating margins decreased by 2.3% and were 5.0% for 2010 compared to 7.3% for
2009. The decrease in operating profit and operating margin was primarily
attributable to an increase in direct costs (excluding staff costs) as a
percentage of revenues from 13.6% in 2009 to 19.9% in 2010. Direct costs
increased due to the requirement that certain costs be included in both revenue
and direct costs due to the Company acting as principle versus agent for certain
client contracts. Total staff costs increased $16.7 million; however, as a
percentage of revenue decreased from 61.5% in 2009 to 58.0% in 2010. General and
administrative costs increased slightly as a percentage of revenue from 20.4% in
2009 to 20.7% in 2010.
Strategic
Marketing Services (“SMS”)
Revenues
attributable to Strategic Marketing Services in the first six months of 2010
were $198.5 million, compared to $172.7 million in 2009. The year-over-year
increase of $25.8 million or 14.9% was attributable primarily to organic growth
of $18.6 million as a result of net new business wins, and acquisition growth of
$3.7 million. A weakening of the US dollar versus the Canadian dollar in 2010
compared to 2009 resulted in a $3.6 million increase in revenues from the
division’s Canadian-based operations.
The
operating profit of Strategic Marketing Services decreased by approximately 8.9%
to $16.7 million in 2010 from $18.3 million in 2009. Operating margins decreased
to 8.4% in 2010 from 10.6% in 2009. Operating profit and margin decreased due
primarily to increased direct costs (excluding staff costs) as a percentage of
revenue from 11.0% in 2009 to 16.6% in 2010. In addition, total staff
costs increased $13.2 million; however, as percentages of revenue decreased from
58.7% in 2009 to 57.7% in 2010. General and administrative costs decreased as a
percentage of revenue from 22.1% in 2009 to 20.8% in 2010, due to the relatively
fixed nature of these costs. Depreciation and amortization decreased $3.3
million, due to certain intangibles being fully amortized by the end of
2009.
34
Performance
Marketing Services
The
Performance Marketing Services segment generated revenues of $107.7 million for
2010, an increase of $18.8 million, or 21.1% higher than revenues of $88.9
million in 2009. The year over year increase was attributed primarily to growth
from acquisitions of $27.9 million. In addition, a weakening of the US dollar
verses the Canadian dollar in 2010 compared to 2009 resulted in a $2.6 million
increase in revenues from the division’s Canadian-based operations. These
increases were offset by reduced revenue of $11.7 million as a result of the
reduction and delays of client spending.
The
Performance Marketing Services incurred an operating loss of $1.3 million, a
decrease of $2.3 million in 2010, from a profit of $1.0 million in 2009.
Operating loss margins were 1.2% in 2010 from an operating profit margin of 1.0%
in 2009. Direct costs (excluding staff costs) increased as a
percentage of revenue from 18.6% in 2009 to 25.9% in 2010. General and
administrative costs increased as a percentage of revenue from 17.0% in the
first six months of 2009 to 20.6% in the first six months of 2010. The increase
as a percentage of revenue was due to reduced organic revenues on relatively
fixed costs within one of our operating unites. Total staff costs
increased $3.4 million; however, decreased as a percentage of revenue from 67.0%
in 2009 to 58.5% in 2010, as the Company reduced costs in connection with the
reduction of organic revenues. Depreciation and amortization
increased by $2.0 million due to the amortization of intangibles in connection
with the 2010 acquisitions.
Corporate
Operating
costs related to the Company’s Corporate operations totaled $10.5 million in
2010 compared to $8.2 million in 2009. This increase of $2.3 million was
primarily related to increased compensation and related costs of $0.5 million,
travel, promotional and related costs of $1.0 million, professional and other
costs of $0.6 million, and the timing of donations of $0.2 million.
Other
Income, Net
Other
income (expense) decreased to an expense of $0.9 million in 2010 compared to an
income of $0.1 million in 2009. The 2010 expense was primarily comprised of a
foreign exchange loss of $0.9 million, compared to a gain of $0.1 million
recorded in 2009. Specifically, this unrealized loss was due primarily to
the weakening in the US dollar during 2010 and 2009 compared to the Canadian
dollar primarily on its US dollar denominated intercompany balances with its
Canadian subsidiaries compared to December 31, 2009.
Net
Interest Expense
Net
interest expense for 2010 was $15.4 million, an increase of $8.2 million over
the $7.2 million of net interest expense incurred during 2009. Interest expense
increased in 2010 due to higher average outstanding debt in 2010, relating to
the 11% senior notes issued in October 2009 and May 2010. Interest income
was nominal in 2010 compared to $0.2 million in 2009.
Income
Taxes
Income
tax expense was $2.2 million in 2009 compared to income tax expense of $0.8
million for 2010. The Company’s effective tax rate in 2010 and 2009 was
substantially higher than the statutory rate due to noncontrolling interest
charges, offset by non-deductible stock based compensation. In addition,
the 2010 effective tax rate was higher due to losses in certain tax
jurisdictions where the benefits are not expected to be realized.
The
Company’s US operating units are generally structured as limited liability
companies, which are treated as partnerships for tax purposes. The Company is
only taxed on its share of profits, while noncontrolling holders are responsible
for taxes on their share of the profits.
Equity
in Affiliates
Equity in
affiliates represents the income (losses) attributable to equity-accounted
affiliate operations. For 2010 a loss of $0.1 million compared to
2009 income of $0.2 million was recorded.
35
Noncontrolling
Interests
Net
income attributable to the noncontrolling interests was $3.0 million for 2010,
an increase of $1.6 million from the $1.4 million of noncontrolling interest
expense incurred during 2009, primarily due to increased profitability of
certain entities which are not wholly owned.
Discontinued
Operations Attributable to MDC Partners Inc.
The loss
of $0.6 million, net of an income tax benefit of $0.3 million from discontinued
operations in 2010, resulted from the operating results and write-off of our
investment of Fearless, which was discontinued in the second quarter of
2010.
The loss,
net of an income tax benefit of $0.4 million from discontinued operations in
2009, resulted from the operating results of Clifford/Bratskeir Public Relations
LLC (“Bratskeir”), which was discontinued in 2008 with the completion of the
sale of Bratskeir’s remaining assets in April 2009.
As a
result, the Company has classified these operations as
discontinued.
Net
Income (loss) attributable to MDC Partners Inc.
As a
result of the foregoing, the net loss attributable to MDC Partners Inc. recorded
for 2010 was $16.0 million or a loss of $0.57 per diluted share, compared to a
net income attributable to MDC Partners Inc. of $0.1 million or $0.01 per
diluted share reported for 2009.
36
Liquidity
and Capital Resources:
Liquidity
The
following table provides summary information about the Company’s liquidity
position:
As of and for the
six months ended
June 30, 2010
|
As of and for the
six months ended
June 30, 2009
|
As of and for the
year ended
December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||
(000’s)
|
(000’s)
|
(000’s)
|
||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
47,454
|
$
|
57,934
|
$
|
51,926
|
||||||
Working
capital (deficit)
|
$
|
(47,008
|
)
|
$
|
(29,229
|
)
|
$
|
(40,152
|
)
|
|||
Cash
from operations
|
$
|
(2,733
|
)
|
$
|
21,431
|
$
|
59,903
|
|||||
Cash
from investing
|
$
|
(63,940
|
)
|
$
|
(5,760
|
)
|
$
|
(66,199
|
)
|
|||
Cash
from financing
|
$
|
62,128
|
$
|
873
|
$
|
20,037
|
||||||
Long-term
debt to total equity ratio
|
2.41
|
1.92
|
2.31
|
|||||||||
Fixed
charge coverage ratio
|
N/A
|
1.38
|
N/A
|
|||||||||
Fixed
charge deficiency
|
$
|
11,439
|
N/A
|
$
|
3,350
|
As of
June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, $6.4 million and $14.1 million,
respectively, of the consolidated cash position was held by subsidiaries, which,
although available for the subsidiaries’ use, does not represent cash that is
distributable as earnings to MDC Partners for use to reduce its indebtedness. It
is the Company’s intent through its cash management system to reduce outstanding
borrowings under the WF Credit Agreement by using available cash.
Working
Capital
At June
30, 2010, the Company had a working capital deficit of $47.0 million compared to
a deficit of $40.2 million at December 31, 2009. The decrease in working
capital was primarily due to seasonal shifts in the amounts collected from
clients, and paid to suppliers, primarily media outlets and improvements made in
the Company’s billing and collecting practices. The Company includes amounts due
to noncontrolling interest holders, for their share of profits, in accrued and
other liabilities. At June 30, 2010, $3.4 million remained outstanding to be
distributed to noncontrolling interest holders over the next twelve
months.
The
Company intends to maintain sufficient cash or availability of funds under its
Credit Agreement at any particular time to adequately fund such working capital
deficits should there be a need to do so from time to time.
37
Cash
Flows
Operating
Activities
Cash flow
used in continuing operations, including changes in non-cash working capital,
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $2.5 million. This was attributable
primarily to a net operating loss from continuing operations attributable to MDC
Partners of $15.3 million, payments of accounts payable and accrued liabilities,
which resulted in cash use from operations of $16.5 million, an increase in
expenditures billable to clients of $8.4 million and an increase in prepaid
expenses and other current assets of $1.0 million. This use of cash was
partially offset by depreciation and amortization and non-cash stock
compensation of $20.0 million, an increase of advance billings to clients of
$16.0 million, decrease in accounts receivable of $1.7 million, and adjustments
to deferred acquisition consideration of $1.6 million. Discontinued operations
attributable to MDC Partners used cash of $0.3 million in the six months ended
June 30, 2010.
Cash flow
provided by continuing operations, including changes in non-cash working
capital, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $21.7 million. This was
attributable primarily to income from continuing operations attributable to MDC
Partners of $0.5 million, depreciation and amortization and non-cash stock
compensation of $19.4 million, and an increase in accounts payable, accruals,
advance billings to clients and other non-current assets and liabilities of
$12.0 million. This cash provided by continuing operations was partially offset
by an increase in accounts receivable of $11.2 million and an increase in
expenditures billable to clients of $1.7 million. Discontinued operations
attributable to MDC Partners used cash of $0.3 million in the six months ended
June 30, 2009.
Investing
Activities
Cash
flows used in investing activities were $63.9 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 compared with $5.8 million in the six months ended June 30,
2009.
In the
six months ended June 30, 2010, capital expenditures totaled $5.7 million, of
which $3.0 million was incurred by the Strategic Marketing Services segment and
$2.5 million was incurred by the Performance Marketing Services segment.
These expenditures consisted primarily of computer equipment and furniture and
fixtures. Expenditures for capital assets in the six months ended June 30, 2009
were $2.1 million. Of this amount, $1.5 million was incurred by the Strategic
Marketing Services segment and $0.6 million was incurred by the Performance
Marketing services Segment. These expenditures consisted primarily of computer
equipment and leasehold improvements.
In the
six months ended June 30, 2010, cash flow used for acquisitions was $57.5
million of which $35.4 million was paid in the acquisition of equity interests
in Team, Communifx, IMS, Sloane, Allison, Infolure, and Plaid, and $22.1 million
was paid related to the settlement of deferred acquisition consideration. Cash
flow used in acquisitions was $3.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2009
and related to the settlement of put options and earn-out payments.
Financing
Activities
During
the six months ended June 30, 2010, cash flows provided by financing activities
amounted to $62.1 million, and consisted primarily from proceeds of $67.6
million relating to the additional issuance of 11% Senior Notes, offset by,
payment of dividends of $2.8, payment of deferred financing costs of $1.5
million, repayments of long-term debt of $0.5 million and the purchase of
treasury shares for income tax withholding requirements of $0.9 million. During
the six months ended June 30, 2009, cash flows provided by financing activities
amounted to $0.9 million, and primarily consisted of borrowings under the old
Financing Agreement of $2.2 million, repayments of long-term debt of $0.9
million and the purchase of treasury shares for income tax withholding
requirements of $0.4 million.
Total
Debt
11%
Senior Notes Due 2016
On
October 23, 2009, the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, as guarantors,
issued and sold $225 million aggregate principal amount of 11% Senior Notes due
2016 (the “11% Notes”). The 11% Notes bear interest at a rate of 11% per annum,
accruing from October 23, 2009. Interest is payable semiannually in arrears in
cash on May 1 and November 1 of each year, beginning on May 1, 2010. The 11%
Notes will mature on November 1, 2016, unless earlier redeemed or repurchased.
The Company received net proceeds before expenses of $209 million which included
an original issue discount of approximately 4.7% or $10.5 million and
underwriter fees of $5.6 million. The 11% Notes were sold in a private placement
in reliance on exemptions from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended. The Company used the net proceeds of this offering to repay the
outstanding balance and terminate its prior Fortress Financing Agreement
consisting of repayments of $130 million of term loans, a $70 million delayed
draw term loan, and $9.7 million outstanding on the $55 million revolving credit
facility. The Company also used the net proceeds to redeem its outstanding 8%
C$45 million convertible debentures.
On May
14, 2010, the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, as guarantors
issued and sold $65,000 aggregate principal amount of 11% Senior Notes due
2016. The additional notes were issued under the Indenture governing
the 11% Notes and treated as a single series with the original 11%
Notes. The additional notes were sold in a private placement in
reliance on exceptions from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended. The Company received net proceeds before expenses of $67,208, which
included an original issue premium of $2,600, and underwriter fees of $392. The
Company used the net proceeds of the offering to repay the outstanding balance
under the Company’s revolving credit facility described elsewhere herein, and
for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions.
The
Company may, at its option, redeem the 11% Notes (including the additional
notes) in whole at any time or in part from time to time, on and after November
1, 2013 at a redemption price of 105.5% of the principal amount thereof. If
redeemed during the twelve-month period beginning on November 1, 2014, the
Company must pay a redemption price of 102.75% of the principal amount thereof.
If redeemed during the twelve-month period beginning on November 1, 2015, the
Company must pay a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount thereof.
Prior to November 1, 2013, the Company may, at its option, redeem some or all of
the 11% Notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes plus
a “make whole” premium and accrued and unpaid interest. The Company may also
redeem, at its option, prior to November 1, 2012, up to 35% of the 11% Notes
with the proceeds from one or more equity offerings at a redemption price of
111% of the principal amount thereof. If the Company experiences certain kinds
of changes of control (as defined in the Indenture), holders of the 11% Notes
may require the Company to repurchase any 11% Notes held by them at a price
equal to 101% of the principal amount of the 11% Notes plus accrued and unpaid
interest. The indenture governing the 11% Notes contains certain events of
default and restrictive covenants which are customary with respect to
non-investment grade debt securities, including limitations on the incurrence of
additional indebtedness, dividends, sales of assets and transactions with
affiliates.
New
Credit Agreement
On
October 23, 2009, the Company and its subsidiaries entered into a new $75
million five year senior secured revolving credit facility (the “WF Credit
Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC, as agent, and the lenders from time
to time party thereto. The WF Credit Agreement replaced the Company’s existing
$185 million senior secured financing agreement with Fortress Credit Corp., as
collateral agent, Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc., as administrative agent. Advances
under the WF Credit Agreement bear interest as follows: (a)(i) LIBOR Rate and
Loans bear interest at the LIBOR Rate and (ii) Base Rate Loans bear interest at
the Base Rate, plus (b) an applicable margin. The initial applicable margin for
borrowings is 3.00% in the case of Base Rate Loans and 3.25% in the case of
LIBOR Rate Loans. The applicable margin may be reduced subject to the Company
achieving certain trailing twelve month earning levels, as defined. In addition
to paying interest on outstanding principal under the WF Credit Agreement, the
Company is required to pay an unused revolver fee to the lenders under the WF
Credit Agreement in respect of unused commitments thereunder.
The WF
Credit Agreement is guaranteed by all of the Company’s present and future
subsidiaries, other than immaterial subsidiaries as defined and is secured by
all the assets of the Company. The WF Credit Agreement includes covenants that,
among other things, restrict the Company’s ability and the ability of its
subsidiaries to incur or guarantee additional indebtedness; pay dividends on or
redeem or repurchase the capital stock of MDC; make certain types of
investments; impose limitations on dividends or other amounts from the Company’s
subsidiaries; incur certain liens, sell or otherwise dispose of certain assets;
enter into transactions with affiliates; enter into sale and leaseback
transactions; and consolidate or merge with or into, or sell substantially all
of the Company’s assets to, another person. These covenants are subject to a
number of important limitations and exceptions. The WF Credit Agreement also
contains financial covenants, including a senior leverage ratio, a fixed charge
coverage ratio and a minimum earnings level, as defined.
38
Debt as
of June 30, 2010 was $286.1 million, an increase of $68.2 million compared with
the $217.9 million outstanding at December 31, 2009, primarily as a result of
the additional issuance of $65 million 11% notes. At June 30, 2010,
$70.0 million was available under the WF Credit Agreement.
The
Company is currently in compliance with all of the terms and conditions of the
WF Credit Agreement, and management believes, based on its current financial
projections, that the Company will be in compliance with its covenants over the
next twelve months.
If the
Company loses all or a substantial portion of its lines of credit under the WF
Credit Agreement, it will be required to seek other sources of liquidity. If the
Company were unable to find these sources of liquidity, for example through an
equity offering or access to the capital markets, the Company’s ability to fund
its working capital needs and any contingent obligations with respect to put
options would be adversely affected.
Pursuant
to the WF Credit Agreement, the Company must comply with certain financial
covenants including, among other things, covenants for (i) total debt ratio,
(ii) fixed charges ratio, and (iii) minimum earnings before interest, taxes and
depreciation and amortization, in each case as such term is specifically defined
in the Credit Facility. For the period ended June 30, 2010, the Company’s
calculation of each of these covenants, and the specific requirements under the
Credit Facility, respectively, were as follows:
June 30, 2010
|
||||
Total
Senior Leverage Ratio
|
(0.46 | ) | ||
Maximum
per covenant
|
2.0 | |||
Fixed
Charges Ratio
|
2.95 | |||
Minimum
per covenant
|
1.25 | |||
Earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
|
$ |
77.6
million
|
||
Minimum
per covenant
|
$ |
71.0
million
|
These
ratios are not based on generally accepted accounting principles and are not
presented as alternative measures of operating performance or liquidity. They
are presented here to demonstrate compliance with the covenants in the Company’s
Credit Facility, as non-compliance with such covenants could have a material
adverse effect on the Company.
Deferred
Acquisition Consideration (Earnouts)
Acquisitions
of businesses by the Company may include commitments to contingent deferred
purchase consideration payable to the seller. These contingent purchase
obligations are generally payable within a one to six-year period following the
acquisition date, and are based on achievement of certain thresholds of future
earnings and, in certain cases, also based on the rate of growth of those
earnings. The contingent consideration is recorded as an obligation of the
Company when the contingency is resolved and the amount is reasonably
determinable, for acquisitions prior to January 1, 2009. Based on various
assumptions, all deferred consideration estimates based on future operating
results of the relevant entities are recorded on the Company’s balance sheet at
June 30, 2010. The actual amount that the Company pays in connection with the
obligations may differ materially from this estimate. The Accounting Standards
Codification’s revised guidance on business combinations now requires that
contingent purchase obligations are recorded as a liability and included in the
original acquisition accounting. At June 30, 2010, there was $60.6 million of
deferred consideration included in the Company’s balance sheet.
Other-Balance
Sheet Commitments
Put
Rights of Subsidiaries’ Noncontrolling Shareholders
Owners of
interests in certain of the Marketing Communications Group subsidiaries have the
right in certain circumstances to require the Company to acquire the remaining
ownership interests held by them. The owners’ ability to exercise any such “put
option” right is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including
conditions requiring notice in advance of exercise. In addition, these rights
cannot be exercised prior to specified staggered exercise dates. The exercise of
these rights at their earliest contractual date would result in obligations of
the Company to fund the related amounts during the period of 2010 to 2018. It is
not determinable, at this time, if or when the owners of these put option rights
will exercise all or a portion of these rights.
The
amount payable by the Company in the event such put option rights are exercised
is dependent on various valuation formulas and on future events, such as the
average earnings of the relevant subsidiary through that date of exercise, the
growth rate of the earnings of the relevant subsidiary during that period, and,
in some cases, the currency exchange rate at the date of
payment.
39
Management
estimates, assuming that the subsidiaries owned by the Company at June 30, 2010,
perform over the relevant future periods at their trailing twelve-month earnings
level, that these rights, if all exercised, could require the Company, in future
periods, to pay an aggregate amount of approximately $29.9 million to the owners
of such rights to acquire such ownership interests in the relevant subsidiaries.
Of this amount, the Company is entitled, at its option, to fund approximately
$2.8 million by the issuance of the Company’s Class A subordinate voting
shares. In addition, the Company is obligated under similar put option rights to
pay an aggregate amount of approximately $10.4 million only upon termination of
such owner’s employment with such applicable subsidiary. The Company intends to
finance the cash portion of these contingent payment obligations using available
cash from operations, borrowings under its Financing Agreement (and refinancings
thereof) and, if necessary, through incurrence of additional debt. The ultimate
amount payable and the incremental operating income in the future relating to
these transactions will vary because it is dependent on the future results of
operations of the subject businesses and the timing of when these rights are
exercised. Approximately $6.3 million of the estimated $29.9 million that the
Company would be required to pay subsidiaries noncontrolling shareholders upon
the exercise of outstanding put option rights, relates to rights exercisable
within the next twelve months. Upon the settlement of the total amount of such
put options, the Company estimates that it would receive incremental operating
income before depreciation and amortization of $8.5 million.
The
following table summarizes the potential timing of the consideration and
incremental operating income before depreciation and amortization based on
assumptions as described above.
Consideration (4)
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014 &
Thereafter
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
($ Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
|
$
|
6.0
|
$
|
2.0
|
$
|
7.8
|
$
|
3.0
|
$
|
8.3
|
$
|
27.1
|
||||||||||||
Shares
|
0.3
|
0.8
|
0.6
|
0.7
|
0.4
|
2.8
|
||||||||||||||||||
$
|
6.3
|
$
|
2.8
|
$
|
8.4
|
$
|
3.7
|
$
|
8.7
|
$
|
29.9
|
(1)
|
||||||||||||
Operating
income before depreciation and amortization to be
received(2)
|
$
|
2.1
|
$
|
0.9
|
$
|
1.6
|
$
|
1.5
|
$
|
2.4
|
$
|
8.5
|
||||||||||||
Cumulative
operating income before depreciation and amortization(3)
|
$
|
2.1
|
$
|
3.0
|
$
|
4.6
|
$
|
6.1
|
8.5
|
$
|
(5)
|
(1)
|
This
amount has been recognized in Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests on the
Company’s balance
sheet.
|
(2)
|
This
financial measure is presented because it is the basis of the calculation
used in the underlying agreements relating to the put rights and is based
on actual 2009 and first quarter 2010 operating results. This amount
represents amounts to be received commencing in the year the put is
exercised.
|
(3)
|
Cumulative
operating income before depreciation and amortization represents the
cumulative amounts to be received by the
company.
|
(4)
|
The
timing of consideration to be paid varies by contract and does not
necessarily correspond to the date of the exercise of the
put.
|
(5)
|
Amounts
are not presented as they would not be meaningful due to multiple periods
included.
|
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
following summary of accounting policies has been prepared to assist in better
understanding the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the related
management’s discussion and analysis. Readers are encouraged to consider this
information together with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and
the related notes to the consolidated financial statements as included in the
Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for a more complete understanding of
accounting policies discussed below.
Estimates . The
preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, or “US GAAP”,
requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and
assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities including
goodwill, intangible assets, valuation allowances for receivables and deferred
income tax assets, stock-based compensation, and the reporting of variable
interest entities at the date of the financial statements. The statements are
evaluated on an ongoing basis and estimates are based on historical experience,
current conditions and various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under
the circumstances. Actual results can differ from those estimates, and it is
possible that the differences could be material.
40
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company’s revenue recognition policies are as required by the Revenue
Recognition topics of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, and
accordingly, revenue is generally recognized when services are provided or upon
delivery of the products when ownership and risk of loss has transferred to the
customer, the selling price is fixed or determinable and collection of the
resulting receivable is reasonably assured.
The
Company earns revenue from agency arrangements in the form of retainer fees or
commissions; from short-term project arrangements in the form of fixed fees or
per diem fees for services; and from incentives or bonuses.
Non-refundable
retainer fees are generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of
the specific customer contract. Commission revenue is earned and recognized upon
the placement of advertisements in various media when the Company has no further
performance obligations. Fixed fees for services are recognized upon completion
of the earnings process and acceptance by the client. Per diem fees are
recognized upon the performance of the Company’s services. In addition, for
certain service transactions, which require delivery of a number of service
acts, the Company uses the Proportional Performance model, which generally
results in revenue being recognized based on the straight-line method due to the
acts being non-similar and there being insufficient evidence of fair value for
each service provided.
Fees
billed to clients in excess of fees recognized as revenue are classified as
advance billings.
A small
portion of the Company’s contractual arrangements with clients includes
performance incentive provisions, which allow the Company to earn additional
revenues as a result of its performance relative to both quantitative and
qualitative goals. The Company recognizes the incentive portion of revenue under
these arrangements when specific quantitative goals are achieved, or when the
Company’s clients determine performance against qualitative goals has been
achieved. In all circumstances, revenue is only recognized when collection is
reasonably assured.
The
Company follows Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent
topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. This topic provides a
summary on when revenue should be recorded at the gross amount billed because
revenue has been earned from the sale of goods or services, or the net amount
retained because a fee or commission has been earned. The Company’s business at
times acts as an agent and records revenue equal to the net amount retained,
when the fee or commission is earned. The Company also follows the
reimbursements received for out-of-pocket expenses. This topic of the FASB
Accounting Standards Codification requires that reimbursements received for
out-of-pocket expenses incurred should be characterized in the income statement
as revenue. Accordingly, the Company has included in revenue such reimbursed
expenses.
Acquisitions, Goodwill and Other
Intangibles . A fair value approach is used in testing goodwill for
impairment to determine if an other than temporary impairment has occurred. One
approach utilized to determine fair values is a discounted cash flow
methodology. When available and as appropriate, comparative market multiples are
used. Numerous estimates and assumptions necessarily have to be made when
completing a discounted cash flow valuation, including estimates and assumptions
regarding interest rates, appropriate discount rates and capital structure.
Additionally, estimates must be made regarding revenue growth, operating
margins, tax rates, working capital requirements and capital expenditures.
Estimates and assumptions also need to be made when determining the appropriate
comparative market multiples to be used. Actual results of operations, cash
flows and other factors used in a discounted cash flow valuation will likely
differ from the estimates used and it is possible that differences and changes
could be material.
The
Company has historically made and expects to continue to make selective
acquisitions of marketing communications businesses. In making acquisitions, the
price paid is determined by various factors, including service offerings,
competitive position, reputation and geographic coverage, as well as prior
experience and judgment. Due to the nature of advertising, marketing and
corporate communications services companies; the companies acquired frequently
have significant identifiable intangible assets, which primarily consist of
customer relationships. The Company has determined that certain intangibles
(trademarks) have an indefinite life, as there are no legal, regulatory,
contractual, or economic factors that limit the useful life.
Business Combinations .
Valuation of acquired companies are based on a number of factors, including
specialized know-how, reputation, competitive position and service offerings.
Our acquisition strategy has been to focus on acquiring the expertise of an
assembled workforce in order to continue building upon the core capabilities of
our various strategic business platforms to better serve our clients. Consistent
with our acquisition strategy and past practice of acquiring a majority
ownership position, most acquisitions completed in 2009 include an initial
payment at the time of closing and provide for future additional contingent
purchase price payments. Contingent payments for these transactions, as well as
certain acquisitions completed in prior years, are derived using the performance
of the acquired entity and are based on pre-determined formulas. Contingent
purchase price obligations for acquisitions completed prior to January 1, 2009
are accrued when the contingency is resolved and payment is certain. Contingent
purchase price obligations related to acquisitions completed subsequent to
December 31, 2008 are recorded as liabilities at estimated value and are
remeasured at each reporting period. Changes in estimated value are recorded in
results of operations. There were no adjustments for remeasurement for the year
ended December 31, 2009. In addition, certain acquisitions also include put/call
obligations for additional equity ownership interests. The estimated value of
these interests are recorded as Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests. As of
January 1, 2009, the Company expenses acquisition related costs in accordance
with the Accounting Standard’s Codification’s new guidance on acquisition
accounting. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, $331 and $730 and
nil, respectively, of acquisition related costs have been changed to operations.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, no acquisition related costs
were charged to operations.
For each
of our acquisitions, we undertake a detailed review to identify other intangible
assets and a valuation is performed for all such identified assets. We use
several market participant measurements to determine estimated value. This
approach includes consideration of similar and recent transactions, as well as
utilizing discounted expected cash flow methodologies. Like most service
businesses, a substantial portion of the intangible asset value that we acquire
is the specialized know-how of the workforce, which is treated as part of
goodwill and is not required to be valued separately. The majority of the value
of the identifiable intangible assets that we acquire is derived from customer
relationships, including the related customer contracts, as well as trade names.
In executing our acquisition strategy, one of the primary drivers in identifying
and executing a specific transaction is the existence of, or the ability to,
expand our existing client relationships. The expected benefits of our
acquisitions are typically shared across multiple agencies and
regions.
Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts . Trade receivables are stated less allowance for doubtful
accounts. The allowance represents estimated uncollectible receivables usually
due to customers’ potential insolvency. The allowance includes amounts for
certain customers where risk of default has been specifically
identified.
Income Tax Valuation
Allowance . The Company records a valuation allowance against
deferred income tax assets when management believes it is more likely than not
that some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized.
Management considers factors such as the reversal of deferred income tax
liabilities, projected future taxable income, the character of the income tax
asset, tax planning strategies, changes in tax laws and other factors. A change
to any of these factors could impact the estimated valuation allowance and
income tax expense.
Stock-based Compensation
. The fair value method is applied to all awards granted, modified or
settled. Under the fair value method, compensation cost is measured at fair
value at the date of grant and is expensed over the service period, that is the
award’s vesting period. When awards are exercised, share capital is credited by
the sum of the consideration paid together with the related portion previously
credited to additional paid-in capital when compensation costs were charged
against income or acquisition consideration. Stock-based awards that are settled
in cash or may be settled in cash at the option of employees are recorded as
liabilities. The measurement of the liability and compensation cost for these
awards is based on the fair value of the award, and is recorded into operating
income over the service period, that is the vesting period of the award. Changes
in the Company’s payment obligation are revalued each period and recorded as
compensation cost over the service period in operating income.
The
Company treats benefits paid by shareholders to employees as a stock based
compensation charge with a corresponding credit to additional paid-in
capital.
41
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In April
2010, the FASB issues ASU 2010-17, “Revenue Recognition-Milestone Method.” ASU
20110-17 provides guidance on the criteria that should be met for determining
whether the milestone method of revenue recognition is appropriate. A
vendor can recognize consideration that is contingent upon achievement of a
milestone in its entirety as revenue in the period in which the milestone is
achieved only if the milestone meets all criteria to be considered
substantive. The amendments in ASU 2010-17 are effective on a
prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods
within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The adoption
will not have an impact on our financial statements.
In April
2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-13, "Compensation - Stock
Compensation Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a
Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying
Equity Security Trades." ASU 2010-13 provides amendments to clarify that an
employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the
currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity's equity
securities trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a
market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not
classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The
amendments in ASU 2010-13 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods
within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The adoption
of this standard will not have an effect on our results of operation or our
financial position.
In
February 2010, the FASB issued an additional Accounting Standards Update on
Subsequent Events to clarify the updated guidance issued in May 2009. This
Guidance clarifies that SEC filers must evaluate subsequent events through the
date the financial statements are issued. However, an SEC filer is not required
to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated.
The amendment is effective June 15, 2010. The adoption did not have an
impact on our financial statements.
In
January 2010, the FASB issued amended guidance to enhance disclosure
requirements related to fair value measurements. The amended guidance for Level
1 and Level 2 fair value measurements is effective January 1, 2010. The
amended guidance for Level 3 fair value measurements will be effective for
January 1, 2011. The guidance requires disclosures of amounts and reasons
for transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 recurring fair value
measurements as well as additional information related to activities in the
reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements. The guidance expanded the
disclosures related to the level of disaggregation of assets and liabilities and
information about inputs and valuation techniques. The adoption of the guidance
for Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements did not have a material impact
on our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements. The adoption of the
guidance related to Level 3 fair value measurements will not have a significant
impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In
January 2010, the FASB issued an Accounts Standards Update on
Consolidation — Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of
a Subsidiary — A Scope Clarification. This Guidance clarifies the
scope of the decrease in ownership provisions and expands the disclosure
requirements about deconsolidation of a subsidiary or de-recognition of a
group of assets. It is effective beginning in the first interim of annual
reporting period ending on or after December 15, 2009. The adoption did not have
an impact on our financial statements.
In
January 2010, the FASB issued Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures — Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.
This Guidance requires new disclosures and clarifies certain existing disclosure
requirements about fair value measurements. It requires a reporting entity to
disclose significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value
measurements, to describe the reasons for the transfers and to present
separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements for
fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs. This Guidance is
effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15,
2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and
settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements,
which is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2010; early adoption is permitted. The adoption will not have a
material effect on our financial statements.
In
October 2009, the FASB issued revised guidance on the topic of
Multiple — Deliverable Revenue Arrangements. The revised guidance
amends certain accounting for revenue with multiple deliverables. In particular
when vendor specific objective evidence or third party evidence for deliverables
in an arrangement cannot be determined, the revised guidance allows use of a
best estimate of the selling price to allocate the arrangement consideration
among them. This guidance is effective for the first quarter of 2011, with early
adoption permitted. The adoption did not have a material impact on our
financial statements.
42
In March
2008, the FASB issued guidance relating to “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities (previously in SFAS No. 161 and currently
included in ACS 815-10-65),” which requires enhanced disclosures for derivative
and hedging activities. The additional disclosures became effective beginning
with our first quarter of 2009. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of
this statement did not have a material effect on our financial
statements.
In
November 2008, the EITF issued guidance on Equity Method Investment Accounting
Considerations, which is effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. This
standard addresses the impact that revised Guidance on Business Combinations and
Noncontrolling Interests might have on the accounting for equity method
investments, including how the initial carrying value of an equity method
investment should be determined, how an impairment assessment of an underlying
indefinite lived intangible asset of an equity method investment should be
performed and how to account for a change in an investment from the equity
method to the cost method. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact
on our financial statements.
In April
2008, the FASB issued revised guidance on the topic of Determination of the
Useful Life of Intangible Assets. The revised guidance amends the factors that
should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to
determine the useful life of a recognized intangible. The intent of this
revision is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under previous guidance, and the period of expected cash flows
used to measure the fair value of the asset. These changes were effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and are to be applied
prospectively to intangible assets acquired subsequent to its effective date.
Accordingly, we adopted these provisions on January 1, 2009. The impact that
this adoption may have on our financial position and results of operations will
depend on the nature and extent of any intangible assets acquired subsequent to
its effective date.
43
Risks
and Uncertainties
This
document contains forward-looking statements. The Company’s representatives may
also make forward-looking statements orally from time to time. Statements in
this document that are not historical facts, including statements about the
Company’s beliefs and expectations, recent business and economic trends,
potential acquisitions, estimates of amounts for deferred acquisition
consideration and “put” option rights, constitute forward-looking statements.
These statements are based on current plans, estimates and projections, and are
subject to change based on a number of factors, including those outlined in this
section. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and
the Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly any of them in light of
new information or future events, if any.
Forward-looking
statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties. A number of important
factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in
any forward-looking statements. Such risk factors include, but are not limited
to, the following:
•
|
risks
associated with severe effects of national and regional economic
downturn;
|
•
|
the
Company’s ability to attract new clients and retain existing
clients;
|
•
|
the
financial success of the Company’s
clients;
|
•
|
the
Company’s ability to retain and attract key
employees;
|
•
|
the
Company’s ability to remain in compliance with its debt agreements and the
Company’s ability to finance its contingent payment obligations when due
and payable, including but not limited to those relating to “put” option
rights and deferred acquisition
consideration;
|
•
|
the
successful completion and integration of acquisitions which complement and
expand the Company’s business capabilities;
and
|
•
|
foreign
currency fluctuations.
|
The
Company’s business strategy includes ongoing efforts to engage in material
acquisitions of ownership interests in entities in the marketing communications
services industry. The Company intends to finance these acquisitions by using
available cash from operations, from borrowings under its current Financing
Agreement and through incurrence of bridge or other debt financing, either of
which may increase the Company’s leverage ratios, or by issuing equity, which
may have a dilutive impact on existing shareholders proportionate ownership. At
any given time, the Company may be engaged in a number of discussions that may
result in one or more material acquisitions. These opportunities require
confidentiality and may involve negotiations that require quick responses by the
Company. Although there is uncertainty that any of these discussions will result
in definitive agreements or the completion of any transactions, the announcement
of any such transaction may lead to increased volatility in the trading price of
the Company’s securities.
Investors
should carefully consider these risk factors, and the risk factors outlined in
more detail in the Company’s 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K under the
caption “Risk Factors”, and in the Company’s other SEC filings.
44
Item 3. Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The
Company is exposed to market risk related to interest rates and foreign
currencies.
Debt
Instruments: At June 30, 2010, the Company’s debt obligations
consisted of amounts outstanding under its WF Credit Agreement and Senior
Notes. The Senior Notes bear a fixed 11% interest rate. The WF Credit
Agreement bears interest at variable rates based upon the Eurodollar rate; US
bank prime rate and, US base rate, at the Company’s option. The Company’s
ability to obtain the required bank syndication commitments depends in part on
conditions in the bank market at the time of syndication. Given the existing
level of debt of nil, as of June 30, 2010, a 1.0% increase or decrease in the
weighted average interest rate, which was 6.0% at June 30, 2010, would have a
nominal interest impact.
Foreign
Exchange: The Company conducts business in four currencies, the US
dollar, the Canadian dollar, Jamaican dollar and the British Pound. Our results
of operations are subject to risk from the translation to the US dollar of the
revenue and expenses of our non-US operations. The effects of currency exchange
rate fluctuations on the translation of our results of operations are discussed
in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Result
of Operations”. For the most part, our revenues and expenses incurred related to
our non-US operations are denominated in their functional currency. This
minimizes the impact that fluctuations in exchange rates will have on profit
margins. The Company does not enter into foreign currency forward exchange
contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of
adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.
The
Company is exposed to foreign currency fluctuations relating to its intercompany
balances between the US and Canada. For every one cent change in the
foreign exchange rate between the US and Canada, the Company will not incur a
material impact to its financial statements.
Item 4. Controls and
Procedures
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We
maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be included in our SEC reports is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the applicable time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and
forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial
Officer (CFO), who is our principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosures. There are inherent limitations
to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures,
including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of
the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and
procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control
objectives. However, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are
designed to provide reasonable assurances of achieving the Company’s control
objectives.
We
conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our CEO, our CFO and our management Disclosure Committee,
of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
the period covered by this report pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange
Act. Based on that evaluation, the Company has concluded that its disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2010.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
identified in connection with the foregoing evaluation that occurred during the
second quarter of 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
45
PART II. OTHER
INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal
Proceedings
The
Company’s operating entities are involved in legal proceedings of various types.
While any litigation contains an element of uncertainty, the Company has no
reason to believe that the outcome of such proceedings or claims will have a
material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of
the Company.
Item 1A. Risk
Factors
There are
no material changes in the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A of the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009.
Item 2. Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon
Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Reserved
Item 5 . Other
Information
On July
29, 2010, the Company entered into an amendment of the Management Services
Agreement with Miles Nadal and Nadal Management, Inc., pursuant to which Mr.
Nadal serves as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Pursuant to this
amendment, the annual retainer fee (base compensation) for Mr. Nadal’s services
was increased to $1.5 million. In addition, the parties amended the
existing terms of a special Cdn $10 million contingent bonus award to provide
that such bonus would be payable to Mr. Nadal upon the sooner to occur (i) the
average market price of the Company’s Class A shares exceeding Cdn $30 per share
during any twenty consecutive trading days; or (ii) a upon a change of control
of the Company.
Item 6. Exhibits
The
exhibits required by this item are listed on the Exhibit Table.
46
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
MDC
PARTNERS INC.
|
/s/ Michael
Sabatino
|
Michael
Sabatino
Senior
Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer
|
July
30, 2010
|
47
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
|
3.1
|
Articles
of Amalgamation, dated July 1, 2010.*
|
|
4.1 |
First
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 14, 2010, to
the Indenture, dated as of October 23, 2009, among the Company, the Note
Guarantors and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, including the form
of 11% Senior Notes due 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
the Company's Form 8-K filed on May 14, 2010).
|
|
10.1
|
Amendment
to Management Services Agreement relating to the employment of Miles Nadal
as Chief Executive Officer, dated July 30, 2010. *
|
|
10.2.1
|
Amendment
No. 1, dated July 29, 2010, to the Membership Interest Purchase
Agreement dated as of March 1, 2010 by and among MDC Acquisition Inc.,
WWG, LLC, Todd Graham, Kevin Berg, Vincent Parinello, Daniel K. Gregory,
Stephen Groth and Sean M. O’Toole.*
|
|
10.2.2
|
Amendment
No. 1, dated July 29, 2010, to the Amended and Restated Limited Liability
Company Agreement of The Arsenal LLC (f/k/a Team Holdings LLC) dated as of
March 1, 2010 by and among The Arsenal LLC, MDC Acquisition Inc., WWG, LLC
and WWG2, LLC.*
|
|
10.3
|
Amendment
No. 1, dated July 29, 2010, to the Membership Unit Purchase Agreement
dated as of April 30, 2010 by and among MF+P Acquisition Co., Integrated
Media Solutions, LLC, Robert Ingram, Desiree DuMont and Ron
Corvino.*
|
|
10.4 |
Purchase
Agreement, dated as of May 11, 2010, among the Company,
the Note Guarantors and Goldman, Sachs & Co., as representative of the
initial purchasers named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1
to the Company's Form 8-K filed on May 14, 2010).
|
|
10.5 |
Exchange
and Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May
14, 2010, among the Company, the Note Guarantors and Goldman, Sachs &
Co., as representative of the initial purchasers named therein
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed
on May 14, 2010).
|
|
12
|
Statement
of computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges.*
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a - 14(a) and 15d - 14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a - 14(a) and 15d - 14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.*
|
|
32.2
|
Certification
by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.*
|
|
99.1
|
Schedule
of ownership by operating
subsidiary.*
|
* Filed
electronically herewith.