STAR BUFFET INC - Quarter Report: 2009 November (Form 10-Q)
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C.
20549
|
FORM
10-Q
|
(Mark One)
[X]
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the quarterly period ended: November
2, 2009
|
OR
[ ]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE
|
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For
the transition period from
_______ to ________
|
Commission
File Number: 0-6054
|
STAR BUFFET,
INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE
|
84-1430786
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(IRS
Employer Identification Number)
|
1312
N. Scottsdale Road,
Scottsdale, AZ
85257
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(480)
425-0397
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes
[ X ] No [
]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files).
Yes [
] No [ ]
Indicated
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or smaller reporting
company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated
filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act. (check one)
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
||
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting company x
|
Indicate
by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes [
] No [ X ]
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date. As of December 9,
2009, there were 3,213,075 shares of Common Stock, $ .001 par value,
outstanding.
STAR BUFFET, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
Page
|
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1. Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements:
|
|
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of November 2, 2009
and January 26, 2009
|
1
|
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the 12 and 40 weeks
ended November 2, 2009 and November 3, 2008
|
3
|
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the 40 weeks
ended November 2, 2009 and November 3, 2008
|
4
|
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
6
|
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
|
|
|
18
|
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
|
27
|
PART
II. OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
|
28
|
|
|
Item
1A. Risk Factors
|
29
|
Item
5. Other Information
|
29
|
Item
6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
|
30
|
Signatures
|
31
|
i
PART
I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1: Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
STAR
BUFFET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
|
November
2,
2009
|
January
26,
2009
|
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 930,000 | $ | 1,118,000 | ||||
Receivables,
net
|
571,000 | 603,000 | ||||||
Income
tax receivable
|
957,000 | 658,000 | ||||||
Inventories
|
638,000 | 647,000 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
417,000 | 437,000 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
399,000 | 271,000 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
3,912,000 | 3,734,000 | ||||||
Property,
buildings and equipment, net:
|
||||||||
Property,
buildings and equipment, net
|
27,281,000 | 26,529,000 | ||||||
Property
and equipment under capitalized leases, net
|
11,000 | 37,000 | ||||||
Property
and equipment leased to third parties, net
|
774,000 | 795,000 | ||||||
Property,
buildings and equipment held for future use, net
|
2,406,000 | 4,143,000 | ||||||
Property
held for sale
|
931,000 | 931,000 | ||||||
Total
property, buildings and equipment, net
|
31,403,000 | 32,435,000 | ||||||
Other
assets:
|
||||||||
Notes
receivable, net of current portion
|
704,000 | 704,000 | ||||||
Deposits
and other
|
496,000 | 376,000 | ||||||
Loan
costs, net
|
408,000 | 506,000 | ||||||
Total
other assets
|
1,608,000 | 1,586,000 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes, net
|
1,339,000 | 2,263,000 | ||||||
Intangible
assets:
|
||||||||
Goodwill
|
551,000 | 551,000 | ||||||
Other
intangible assets, net
|
529,000 | 638,000 | ||||||
Total
intangible assets
|
1,080,000 | 1,189,000 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 39,342,000 | $ | 41,207,000 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
1
STAR
BUFFET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Continued)
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
November
2,
2009
|
January
26,
2009
|
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable-trade
|
$ | 3,093,000 | $ | 4,192,000 | ||||
Checks
written in excess of bank balance
|
1,407,000 | 527,000 | ||||||
Payroll
and related taxes
|
1,706,000 | 1,859,000 | ||||||
Sales
and property taxes
|
1,710,000 | 1,829,000 | ||||||
Rent,
licenses and other
|
785,000 | 766,000 | ||||||
Current
maturities of obligations under long-term debt
|
1,903,000 | 3,548,000 | ||||||
Current
maturities of obligations under capital leases
|
13,000 | 54,000 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
10,617,000 | 12,775,000 | ||||||
Deferred
rent payable
|
839,000 | 1,353,000 | ||||||
Other
accrued long-term liabilities
|
493,000 | 493,000 | ||||||
Note
payable to officer
|
1,992,000 | 1,992,000 | ||||||
Long-term
debt, net of current maturities
|
10,785,000 | 10,051,000 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
24,726,000 | 26,664,000 | ||||||
Stockholders’
equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, $.001 par value; authorized 1,500,000 shares; none issued or
outstanding
Common
stock, $.001 par value; authorized 8,000,000 shares; issued and
outstanding 3,213,075 shares
|
—3,000 | —3,000 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
17,743,000 | 17,743,000 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(3,130,000 | ) | (3,203,000 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
14,616,000 | 14,543,000 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 39,342,000 | $ | 41,207,000 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
2
STAR BUFFET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Twelve
Weeks Ended
|
Forty
Weeks Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
November
2,
|
November
3,
|
November
2,
|
November
3,
|
|||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
$ | 15,617,000 | $ | 20,837,000 | $ | 63,282,000 | $ | 78,226,000 | ||||||||
Costs,
expenses and other
|
||||||||||||||||
Food
costs
|
6,179,000 | 8,215,000 | 24,476,000 | 30,386,000 | ||||||||||||
Labor
costs
|
5,749,000 | 7,067,000 | 20,784,000 | 25,554,000 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy
and other expenses
|
3,253,000 | 4,104,000 | 12,599,000 | 15,622,000 | ||||||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
391,000 | 640,000 | 1,636,000 | 2,284,000 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
667,000 | 615,000 | 2,246,000 | 2,074,000 | ||||||||||||
Impairment
of long-lived assets
|
644,000 | — | 1,080,000 | 212,000 | ||||||||||||
Gain
on property disposal
|
— | — | (306,000 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Total
costs, expenses and other
|
16,883,000 | 20,641,000 | 62,515,000 | 76,132,000 | ||||||||||||
(Loss)
income from operations
|
(1,266,000 | ) | 196,000 | 767,000 | 2,094,000 | |||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(236,000 | ) | (265,000 | ) | (755,000 | ) | (837,000 | ) | ||||||||
Interest
income
|
— | 1,000 | 75,000 | 13,000 | ||||||||||||
Other
income
|
10,000 | 22,000 | 31,000 | 76,000 | ||||||||||||
(Loss)
income before income taxes
|
(1,492,000 | ) | (46,000 | ) | 118,000 | 1,346,000 | ||||||||||
Income
taxes (benefit)
|
(626,000 | ) | (28,000 | ) | 44,000 | 437,000 | ||||||||||
Net
(loss)income
|
$ | (866,000 | ) | $ | (18,000 | ) | $ | 74,000 | $ | 909,000 | ||||||
Net
(loss) income per common share – basic
|
$ | (0.27 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.28 | ||||||
Net
(loss) income per common share – diluted
|
$ | (0.27 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.28 | ||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding – basic
|
3,213,075 | 3,213,075 | 3,213,075 | 3,212,772 | ||||||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding –diluted
|
3,213,075 | 3,213,075 | 3,213,075 | 3,212,864 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
3
STAR
BUFFET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
40
weeks Ended
|
||||||||
November
2,
2009
|
November
3,
2008
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 74,000 | $ | 909,000 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by
operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
|
2,180,000 | 1,960,000 | ||||||
Amortization
of franchise and licenses
|
66,000 | 60,000 | ||||||
Amortization
of loan costs
|
134,000 | 139,000 | ||||||
Impairment
of long-lived assets
|
1,080,000 | 212,000 | ||||||
Gain
on property disposal
|
(306,000 | ) | — | |||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
944,000 | 243,000 | ||||||
Change
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Receivables
|
27,000 | (269,000 | ) | |||||
Inventories
|
9,000 | (242,000 | ) | |||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
(128,000 | ) | (292,000 | ) | ||||
Deposits
and other
|
(120,000 | ) | 193,000 | |||||
Deferred
rent payable
|
(514,000 | ) | (232,000 | ) | ||||
Accounts
payable-trade
|
(1,099,000 | ) | (337,000 | ) | ||||
Income
taxes receivable
|
(299,000 | ) | — | |||||
Income
taxes payable
|
— | 4,000 | ||||||
Other
accrued liabilities
|
(253,000 | ) | 930,000 | |||||
Total
adjustments
|
1,721,000 | 2,369,000 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
1,795,000 | 3,278,000 | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Insurance
proceeds
|
540,000 | — | ||||||
Acquisition
of property, buildings and equipment
|
(2,413,000 | ) | (7,479,000 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(1,873,000 | ) | (7,479,000 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Checks
written in excess of cash in bank
|
880,000 | 674,000 | ||||||
Proceeds
received from officer’s note payable
|
— | 592,000 | ||||||
Payments
on long term debt
|
(4,206,000 | ) | (4,367,000 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from issuance of long-term debt
|
3,294,000 | 11,442,000 | ||||||
(Payments)
proceeds on line of credit, net
|
— | (1,349,000 | ) | |||||
Capitalized
loan costs
|
(36,000 | ) | (325,000 | ) | ||||
Principal
payment on capitalized lease obligations
|
(42,000 | ) | (37,000 | ) | ||||
Dividends
paid
|
— | (1,928,000 | ) | |||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(110,000 | ) | 4,702,000 | |||||
Net
change in cash and cash equivalents
|
(188,000 | ) | 501,000 | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
1,118,000 | 736,000 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 930,000 | $ | 1,237,000 |
4
STAR
BUFFET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)
(Unaudited)
40
weeks Ended
|
||||||||
|
November 2, 2009
|
November 3, 2008
|
|
|||||
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 625,000 | $ | 725,000 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | 44,000 | $ | 190,000 | ||||
Non cash investing and financing
activities:
|
||||||||
Exchange
of stock for loan costs
|
$ | − | $ | 252,000 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
5
STAR
BUFFET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note (A) Basis of
Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the
accounts for Star Buffet, Inc., together with its direct and indirect
wholly-owned independently capitalized subsidiaries Summit Family Restaurants
Inc. (“Summit”), HTB Restaurants, Inc. (“HTB”), Northstar Buffet, Inc. (“NSBI”),
Star Buffet Management, Inc. (“SBMI”), Starlite Holdings, Inc. (“Starlite”), SBI
Leasing, Inc. (‘SBI”) and StarTexas Restaurants, Inc. (“StarTexas”)
(collectively the “Company”) and have been prepared in accordance with U. S.
generally accepted accounting principles, the instructions to Form 10-Q and
Article 10 of Regulation S-X. These financial statements should be
read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements, and the
notes thereto, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended January 26, 2009. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair
presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the interim
periods presented have been reflected herein. Results of operations
for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be
expected for the full fiscal year or for any future periods. The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the results of
operations and assets and liabilities directly related to the Company’s
operations. The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain
reclassifications have been made in the prior period financial statements in
order to conform to the classifications adopted for reporting in fiscal 2010.
Such reclassifications include an increase in other assets for loan costs, net,
with a corresponding decrease in total intangible assets for other intangible
assets, net. The amount reclassified for November 2, 2009 and January 26, 2009
was $408,000 and $506,000, respectively. This reclassification did not affect
total assets, earnings before income taxes, net earnings or earnings per
share.
The
following is a summary of the Company's restaurant properties as of November 2,
2009. The Company has two reporting segments, the Buffet Division and
the Non-Buffet Division. The Company’s reportable segments are aggregated based
on operating similarities. The Buffet Division includes 19 Barnhill’s
Buffets, nine HomeTown Buffets, three BuddyFreddys, two Whistle Junction
restaurants and one JJ North’s Grand Buffet. One of the Barnhill’s Buffets was
temporarily closed due to a kitchen fire in May of 2009, but reopened in the
third quarter of this year. The Buffet Division also has two
restaurants closed for remodeling and repositioning, a closed restaurant
reported as property held for sale, and a restaurant located in Arizona that is
leased to a third-party operator. In addition, one closed restaurant
was converted into a warehouse for equipment in Florida during the first quarter
of fiscal 2010. The Non-Buffet Division includes seven JB’s
restaurants, five 4B’s restaurants, three K-BOB’S Steakhouses, two Western
Sizzlin restaurants, two Casa Bonita restaurants, a Holiday House restaurant, a
Bar-H Steakhouse and a Pecos Diamond Steakhouse. Additionally, the
Non-Buffet Division has a K-BOB’S Steakhouse restaurant closed for
remodeling.
6
Buffet
Division
|
Non-Buffet
Division
|
Total
|
|||||||
Owned
|
10
|
9
|
19
|
||||||
Leased
|
29
|
14
|
43
|
||||||
Total
|
39
|
23
|
62 |
As of
November 2, 2009, the Company’s operating and non-operating restaurants are
located in the following states:
Number
of Restaurants
|
|||||
State
|
Buffet
Division
|
Non-Buffet
Division
|
Total
|
||
Alabama
|
1
|
−
|
1
|
||
Arkansas
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
||
Arizona
|
7
|
−
|
7
|
||
Colorado
|
−
|
1
|
1
|
||
Florida
|
14
|
1
|
15
|
||
Idaho
|
−
|
1
|
1
|
||
Louisiana
|
3
|
−
|
3
|
||
Mississippi
|
6
|
1
|
7
|
||
Montana
|
−
|
7
|
7
|
||
New
Mexico
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
||
Oklahoma
|
−
|
1
|
1
|
||
Oregon
|
1
|
−
|
1
|
||
Tennessee
|
3
|
−
|
3
|
||
Texas
|
−
|
4
|
4
|
||
Utah
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
||
Wyoming
|
1
|
−
|
1
|
||
Total
|
39
|
23
|
62
|
As of
November 2, 2009, the Company’s non-operating restaurants are located in the
following states:
Number
of
Non-Operating
Restaurants
|
|||||
State
|
Buffet
Division
|
Non-Buffet
Division
|
Total
|
||
Arizona
|
1
|
−
|
1
|
||
Florida
|
4
|
−
|
4
|
||
Texas
|
−
|
1
|
1
|
||
Total
|
5
|
1
|
6
|
7
As of
November 3, 2008, the Company’s operating and non-operating restaurants were
located in the following states:
Number
of Restaurants
|
|||||
State
|
Buffet
Division
|
Non-Buffet
Division
|
Total
|
||
Alabama
|
1
|
−
|
1
|
||
Arkansas
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
||
Arizona
|
9
|
−
|
9
|
||
Colorado
|
−
|
1
|
1
|
||
Florida
|
15
|
2
|
17
|
||
Idaho
|
−
|
1
|
1
|
||
Louisiana
|
3
|
−
|
3
|
||
Mississippi
|
6
|
1
|
7
|
||
Montana
|
−
|
6
|
6
|
||
New
Mexico
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
||
Oklahoma
|
−
|
1
|
1
|
||
Oregon
|
1
|
−
|
1
|
||
Tennessee
|
3
|
−
|
3
|
||
Texas
|
−
|
4
|
4
|
||
Utah
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
||
Washington
|
1
|
−
|
1
|
||
Wyoming
|
1
|
−
|
1
|
||
Total
|
43
|
22
|
65
|
As of
November 3, 2008, the Company’s non-operating restaurants were located in the
following states:
Number
of
Non-Operating
Restaurants
|
|||||
State
|
Buffet
Division
|
Non-Buffet
Division
|
Total
|
||
Arizona
|
1
|
−
|
1
|
||
Florida
|
4
|
−
|
4
|
||
New
Mexico
|
−
|
1
|
1
|
||
Texas
|
−
|
1
|
1
|
||
Total
|
5
|
2
|
7
|
The
operating results for the 40-week period ended November 2, 2009 included
operations shown in the tables above and fixed charges for six non-operating
restaurants for the entire period. Three of the six closed restaurants remain
closed for remodeling and repositioning, one closed restaurant was leased to a
third party and one closed restaurant was closed and reported as property held
for sale. In addition, one closed restaurant was converted into a
warehouse for equipment in Florida during the first quarter of fiscal
2010. The operating results for the 40-week period ended November 3,
2008 included operations shown in the tables above and the fixed charges for
seven restaurants closed the entire period.
8
The
Company utilizes a 52/53 week fiscal year which ends on the last Monday in
January. The first quarter of each year contains 16 weeks while the
other three quarters each contain 12 weeks, except the fourth quarter has 13
weeks if the fiscal year has 53 weeks.
Note (B) Recent
Developments
In April
2009, the Company refinanced an existing real estate mortgage by entering into a
$1,194,000 five year fixed rate real estate mortgage with the Bank of Utah. The
mortgage has monthly payments including interest of $10,972. The interest rate
is 7.25%. The mortgage is secured by the HomeTown Buffet in Layton,
Utah and the JB’s restaurant in Vernal, Utah. The Company used the funds to
payoff the previous loan with the Bank of Utah of $696,000 and the balance was
used to reduce the $8,000,000 term loan to Wells Fargo.
In May,
2009, a kitchen fire in a Jonesboro, Arkansas store occurred. The Company has
$800,000 worth of property coverage and $150,000 extra expense coverage subject
to a $100,000 deductible. The Company spent approximately $635,000 to replace
the damaged equipment in the Barnhill’s Buffet and booked a gain of $306,000
after deducting the net carrying value of damaged assets of $229,000 and the
$100,000 deductible. Included in trade receivable is a remaining balance
receivable of $150,000 in insurance proceeds as of November 2,
2009. Total proceeds booked for property coverage from insurance for
this matter was $535,000 as of November 2, 2009. In addition, the
Company has booked $150,000 for business interruption and extra expense
coverage which is included in account receivable at November 2, 2009.
The
Company has evaluated subsequent events through December 16, 2009 which is the
date that these financial statements were filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
In June
2009, the Company opened a 4B’s restaurant in Butte, Montana.
In August
2009, the Company financed part of the $1.1 million purchase of the land and
building of its Whistle Junction restaurant in Titusville, Florida with a real
estate mortgage with the Mainstreet Community Bank of Florida. The
Company entered into a $750,000 fixed rate real estate mortgage amortized on a
twenty-year basis with a balloon payment due August 26, 2014. The mortgage has
monthly payments including interest of $6,100. The interest rate is
7.5%. The mortgage is secured by the Whistle Junction restaurant in
Titusville, Florida.
In
September, 2009, the Company determined two restaurant leases would not be
renewed. The restaurants in Chandler, Arizona and Olympia, Washinton were closed
and a pretax impairment charge of approximately $563,000 was taken in the third
quarter of fiscal 2010 for leasehold improvements.
In
October 2009, the Company opened a JB’s Restaurant in Albuquerque, New
Mexico.
Subsequent
to November 2, 2009, the Company determined two restaurant leases would not be
renewed. The restaurants in Phoenix, Arizona and Bartlett, Tennessee were closed
and a pretax impairment charge of approximately $193,000 will be taken in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. The Company also closed owned restaurant
properties in and Layton, Utah and Magnolia, Arkansas on November 8, 2009 and
November 30, 2009, respectively.
Subsequent
to November 2, 2009, the Company financed the $920,000 purchase of the land and
building of its Whistle Junction restaurant in South Daytona, Florida with Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A. Wells Fargo increased the existing revolving line of
credit from $2,000,000 to $2,500,000 to complete the purchase.
9
Note (C) Related Party
Transactions
Mr.
Robert E. Wheaton owns approximately 45.3% of the Company's outstanding common
shares, including exercisable options held by him, which have vested and may
have the effective power to elect members of the board of directors and to
control the vote on substantially all other matters without the approval of the
other stockholders. During fiscal 2008, the Company borrowed
approximately $1,400,000 from Mr. Robert E. Wheaton, a principal
stockholder, officer and director of the Company. This loan dated
June 15, 2007 is subordinated to the obligation to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
and bears interest at 8.5%. In June, 2008, the Company borrowed an additional
$592,000 from Mr. Wheaton under the same terms. This resulted in an increase in
the subordinated note balance from $1,400,000 to $1,992,000. The
Company expensed and paid $130,000 to Mr. Wheaton for interest during the first
three quarters of fiscal 2010. The principal balance and any unpaid interest are
due and payable in full on June 5, 2012. The Company used the
funds borrowed from Mr. Wheaton for working capital requirements.
Note (D) Segment and Related
Reporting
The
Company has two reporting segments, the Buffet Division and the Non-Buffet
Division. The Company’s reportable segments are aggregated based on operating
similarities.
The
accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described
in Note 1 of the audited consolidated financial statements included in the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 26, 2009. The
Company evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on income
before income taxes.
Summarized
financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments is shown in
the following table. The other assets presented in the condensed consolidated
balance sheets and not in the reportable segments relate to the Company as a
whole, and not individual segments. Also certain corporate overhead income and
expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations are not included
in the reportable segments.
(Dollars
in Thousands)
40
weeks Ended
November 2,
2009
|
Buffet
Division
|
Non-Buffet
Division
|
Other
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 41,592 | $ | 21,690 | $ | — | $ | 63,282 | ||||||||
Interest
income
|
— | — | 75 | 75 | ||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(2 | ) | — | (753 | ) | (755 | ) | |||||||||
Depreciation
& amortization
|
1,552 | 667 | 27 | 2,246 | ||||||||||||
Impairment
of long-lived assets
|
934 | 146 | — | 1,080 | ||||||||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
(586 | ) | 2,761 | (2,057 | ) | 118 | ||||||||||
Total
assets
|
21,616 | 12,700 | 5,026 | 39,342 | ||||||||||||
40
weeks Ended
November 3,
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 57,773 | $ | 20,453 | $ | — | $ | 78,226 | ||||||||
Interest
income
|
— | — | 13 | 13 | ||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(5 | ) | — | (832 | ) | (837 | ) | |||||||||
Depreciation
& amortization
|
1,543 | 442 | 89 | 2,074 | ||||||||||||
Impairment
of long-lived assets
|
198 | 14 | — | 212 | ||||||||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
2,116 | 2,019 | (2,789 | ) | 1,346 | |||||||||||
Total
assets
|
24,954 | 12,757 | 4,546 | 42,257 |
10
Note (E) Net Income per
Common Share
Net
income per common share - basic is computed based on the weighted-average number
of common shares outstanding during the period. Net income per common
share – diluted is computed based on the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding during the period plus the effect of dilutive common stock
equivalents outstanding during the period. Stock options are
considered to be common stock equivalents and are included in the diluted
calculation using the treasury stock method.
The
following table summarizes the calculation of basic and diluted net income per
common share for the respective fiscal periods:
12 Weeks Ended November 2,
2009
|
Net Loss
|
Shares
|
Per
Share Amount
|
|||||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding – basic
|
$ | (866,000 | ) | 3,213,075 | $ | (0.27 | ) | |||||
Dilutive
stock
options
|
– | – | – | |||||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding – diluted
|
$ | (866,000 | ) | 3,213,075 | $ | (0.27 | ) | |||||
12 Weeks Ended November 3,
2008
|
||||||||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding – basic
|
$ | (18,000 | ) | 3,213,075 | $ | (0.01 | ) | |||||
Dilutive
stock
options
|
– | – | – | |||||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding – diluted
|
$ | (18,000 | ) | 3,213,075 | $ | (0.01 | ) |
40 weeks Ended November 2,
2009
|
Net Income
|
Shares
|
Per
Share Amount
|
|||||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding – basic
|
$ | 74,000 | 3,213,075 | $ | 0.02 | |||||||
Dilutive
stock
options
|
– | – | – | |||||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding – diluted
|
$ | 74,000 | 3,213,075 | $ | 0.02 | |||||||
40 weeks Ended November 3,
2008
|
||||||||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding – basic
|
$ | 909,000 | 3,212,772 | $ | 0.28 | |||||||
Dilutive
stock
options
|
– | 92 | – | |||||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding – diluted
|
$ | 909,000 | 3,212,864 | $ | 0.28 |
Weighted-average
common shares outstanding for the 12 weeks ended November 2, 2009 and November
3, 2008 used to calculate diluted earnings per share exclude stock options to
purchase 22,000 and 28,000 shares of common stock, respectively, because these
options are antidilutive due to the Company’s net loss for the
periods.
Weighted-average
common shares outstanding for the 40 weeks ended November 2, 2009 and November
3, 2008 used to calculate diluted earnings per share exclude stock options to
purchase 22,000 and 28,000 shares of common stock, respectively, due to the
market price of the underlying stock being less than the exercise
price.
11
Note (F)
Goodwill
Goodwill
primarily represents the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value
of the net assets acquired in connection with business acquisitions. The Company
reviews goodwill for possible impairment on an annual basis or when triggering
events occur in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board
("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 350. ASC 350
requires goodwill to be tested for impairment at the reporting unit level, which
is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment. The
Company considers each individual restaurant to be a reporting unit and
therefore reviews goodwill for possible impairment by restaurant.
The
Company utilizes a two-part impairment test. First, the fair value of
the reporting unit is compared to carrying value (including
goodwill). If the carrying value is greater than the fair value, the
second step is performed. In the second step, the implied fair value
of the reporting unit goodwill is compared to the carrying amount of
goodwill. If the carrying value is greater, a loss is recognized. The
goodwill impairment test considers the impact of current conditions and the
economic outlook for the restaurant industry, the general overall economic
outlook including market data, and governmental and environmental factors, in
establishing the assumptions used to compute the fair value of each reporting
unit. We also take into account the historical, current and future
(based on probability) operating results of each reporting unit and any other
facts and data pertinent to valuing the reporting units in our impairment
test.
The
Company performs its annual impairment analysis on February 1st. The
Company utilizes the services of an independent valuation firm to assist
management in the impairment analysis of goodwill at least once every three
years. The most recent independent valuation was conducted as of
February 1, 2008. There were no triggering events during the quarter ending
November 2, 2009 that would have had an impact on goodwill. There were no
goodwill impairment charges recorded for the 40-week periods ended November 2,
2009 and November 3, 2008.
Note (G) Other Intangible
Assets
Other
intangible assets are comprised of franchise fees, a license agreement and
trademarks. Franchise fees are amortized using the straight-line method over the
terms of the franchise agreements, which typically range from 8 to 20
years. Loan acquisition costs are amortized using the straight-line
method over the estimated life of the loan. The license agreement is
amortized using the straight-line method over 11 years. Trademarks have an
indefinite asset life, total $255,000, and are subject to possible impairments
on an annual basis or when triggering events occur in accordance with ASC 350
Intangibles – Goodwill and Other.
Note (H)
Inventories
Inventories
consist of food, beverage, gift shop items and certain restaurant supplies and
are valued at the lower of cost or market, determined by the first-in, first-out
method.
Note (I) Accounting for
Long-Lived Assets
The
Company evaluates impairment of long-lived assets in accordance with ASC 360,
“Property, Plant and Equipment”. The Company assesses whether an
impairment write-down is necessary whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured
by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net
cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such asset is
considered to be impaired, the impairment loss to be recognized is measured by
the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of
the asset. There was $429,000 and $0, respectively, for impairment charges of
long-lived assets recorded for the 12-week periods ended November 2, 2009 and
November 3, 2008. There was $1,048,000 and $212,000, respectively, for
impairment charges of long-lived assets recorded for the 40-week periods ended
November 2, 2009 and November 3, 2008
12
Note (J) Properties,
Building and Equipment
The
components of property, buildings and equipment used in restaurant operations
and one property used as a warehouse, not including property under capitalized
leases, leased to third parties, held for future use and held for sale, are as
follows:
November
2,
2009
|
January
26,
2009
|
|||||||
Property,
buildings and equipment:
|
||||||||
Furniture,
fixtures and equipment
|
$ | 23,575,000 | $ | 24,993,000 | ||||
Land
|
5,502,000 | 4,285,000 | ||||||
Buildings
and leasehold improvements
|
22,236,000 | 22,592,000 | ||||||
51,313,000 | 51,870,000 | |||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
(24,032,000 | ) | (25,341,000 | ) | ||||
$ | 27,281,000 | $ | 26,529,000 |
The
components of property under capitalized leases are as follows:
Property
and equipment under capitalized leases
|
$ | 706,000 | $ | 706,000 | ||||
Less
accumulated amortization
|
(695,000 | ) | (669,000 | ) | ||||
$ | 11,000 | $ | 37,000 |
Total
property, buildings and equipment includes the following land, equipment and
buildings and leaseholds associated with six non-operating units as of November
2, 2009 and as of January 26, 2009. As of November 2, 2009 one of the six units
is leased to a third-party operator, three units are closed for remodeling and
repositioning and one unit is included in property held for sale. In
addition, one previously closed restaurant was converted into a warehouse to
store Company equipment in Kissimmee, Florida in the first quarter of fiscal
2010. The property had a net building and land value of $937,000 and
$817,000, respectively, at the time of conversion.
The
components are as follows:
November
2,
2009
|
January
26,
2009
|
|||||||
Property and equipment leased to third parties: | ||||||||
Equipment
|
$ | 222,000 | $ | 222,000 | ||||
Land
|
224,000 | 224,000 | ||||||
Buildings
and leaseholds
|
685,000 | 685,000 | ||||||
1,131,000 | 1,131,000 | |||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
(357,000 | ) | (336,000 | ) | ||||
$ | 774,000 | $ | 795,000 |
13
November
2,
2009
|
January
26,
2009
|
|||||||
Property, buildings and equipment held for future use: | ||||||||
Equipment
|
$ | 3,291,000 | $ | 3,273,000 | ||||
Land
|
742,000 | 1,559,000 | ||||||
Buildings
and leaseholds
|
1,257,000 | 2,484,000 | ||||||
5,290,000 | 7,316,000 |
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
(2,884,000 | ) | (3,173,000 | ) | ||||
$ | 2,406,000 | $ | 4,143,000 |
November
2,
2009
|
January
26,
2009
|
|||||||
Property held for sale: | ||||||||
Land
|
$ | 567,000 | $ | 567,000 | ||||
Buildings
|
364,000 | 364,000 | ||||||
$ | 931,000 | $ | 931,000 |
The
Company recorded $212,000 of impairment expense related to the closure of six
restaurants in the first three quarters of fiscal 2009. The Company
recorded $405,000 of impairment expense related the leasehold improvements in
two closed restaurants in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and $637,000 of
impairment expense related to closed restaurants in the third quarter of fiscal
2010.
Note (K) Stock-Based
Compensation
In fiscal
year 1998, the Company adopted the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the "1997 Plan"),
which authorizes the grant of options to purchase up to 750,000 shares of Common
Stock. The 1997 Plan provides for the grant of "incentive stock
options," within the meaning of section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended (the "Code"), and non-statutory options to directors, officers,
employees and consultants of the Company, except that incentive stock options
may not be granted to non-employee directors or consultants. The 1997 Plan
provides participants with incentives which will encourage them to acquire a
proprietary interest in, and continue to provide services to, the Company. A
special committee designated by the board has sole discretion and authority,
consistent with the provisions of the 1997 Plan, to determine which eligible
participants will receive options, the time when options will be granted, terms
of options granted and the number of shares which will be subject to options
granted under the 1997 Plan.
The
Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC
718. ASC 718 requires the recognition of compensation costs relating
to share based payment transactions in the financial statements. Our stock-based
compensation plans are summarized in the table below:
Shares
|
Shares
|
Plan
|
||||||
Name
of Plan
|
Authorized
|
Available
|
Expiration
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
1997
Stock Incentive Plan
|
750,000
|
507,000
|
February 2015 |
14
Stock
options issued under the terms of the plan have, or will have, an
exercise price equal to, or greater than, the fair market value of the common
stock at the date of the option grant, and expire no later than ten years from
the date of grant, with the most recent grant expiring in
2015.
The stock
option transactions and the options outstanding are summarized as
follows:
40
weeks Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
November
2, 2009
|
November
3, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||
Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
at beginning of period
|
39,000 | $ | 6.21 | 40,000 | $ | 6.20 | ||||||||||
Granted
|
— | $ | — | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Exercised
|
— | $ | — | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Forfeited
|
17,000 | $ | 5.59 | 0 | $ | 5.00 | ||||||||||
Outstanding
at end of period
|
22,000 | $ | 6.70 | 40,000 | $ | 6.21 | ||||||||||
Exercisable
at end of period
|
22,000 | $ | 6.70 | 40,000 | $ | 6.21 | ||||||||||
Weighted
average fair value of options granted during the period
|
$ | N/A | $ | N/A |
The
following summarizes information about stock options outstanding at November 2,
2009:
Options
Outstanding
|
Options
Exercisable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Range
of
Exercise
Prices
|
Number
Outstanding
|
Remaining
Contractual
Life
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Number
Exercisable
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|||||||||||||||||
$ |
6.70
|
22,000
|
5.3
|
$ |
6.70
|
22,000
|
$ |
6.70
|
The
Company did not grant any stock options in the first three quarters of fiscal
2010 or fiscal 2009. The intrinsic value of the outstanding stock options was $0
as of November 2, 2009.
Note (L) Commitments and
Contingencies
Prior to
the Company’s formation in 1998, HTB entered into franchise agreements for each
of its HomeTown Buffet locations which require the payment of a royalty fee to
HomeTown Buffet, Inc. The royalty fee is 2% of the gross sales of each HomeTown
Buffet restaurant. The franchise agreements have a 20-year term (with two
five-year renewal options). The franchisor requires HTB to operate each
restaurant in conformity with Franchise Operating Manuals and Recipe Manuals and
Menus. The franchise agreements also place certain limits on the Company’s
ability to operate competing buffet businesses within specified geographic
areas. The HomeTown franchisor may terminate a franchise agreement
for a number of reasons, including HTB’s failure to pay royalty fees when due,
failure to comply with applicable laws or repeated failure to comply with one or
more requirements of the franchise agreement. However, many state franchise laws
limit the ability of a franchisor to terminate or refuse to renew a
franchise.
15
In
conjunction with the acquisition of certain JJ North’s restaurants from North’s
Restaurants, Inc. (“North’s”) in 1997, the Company provided a credit facility to
North’s. When North’s defaulted the Company sued for
enforcement. In 1998, the Company’s suit with North’s resulted in a
negotiated settlement in favor of the Company. In a related
proceeding, North’s other secured creditor, Pacific Mezzanine, initiated
litigation against North’s seeking a monetary judgment and the appointment of a
receiver. In April, 2006 the Company noticed all relevant parties of
its intent to foreclose to seek expedited liquidation of North’s assets and
repay amounts owed to the Company. Subsequent to the notice, the
receiver moved to have the Company’s foreclosure of North’s assets set aside so
that certain of North’s assets could be sold to a third party. The
motion was approved. On August 7, 2006, the receiver paid the Company
approximately $1,291,000 from a partial sale of the assets. In August 2007, the
receiver notified the Company that he planned to turn control of the JJ North’s
restaurant in Grants Pass, Oregon and associated assets over to the Company. On
September 22, 2007, the Company hired former North’s employees, notified North’s
creditors of its intent to operate the business and negotiated a facility lease
with North’s previous landlord. The transfer of assets from North’s
to Star Buffet Management, Inc. was approved by the court. The
Company’s note, together with the obligation to the other significant creditor
of North’s, is secured by the real and personal property, trademarks and all
other intellectual property owned by North’s. The Company believes proceeds from
future asset sales are adequate for recovery of the remaining principal amount
of the note receivable. The note receivable balance was $490,000 on
November 2, 2009. The Company has not provided an allowance for bad debts for
the note as of November 2, 2009.
In
connection with the Company’s employment contract with Robert E. Wheaton, the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President, the Company has agreed to pay
Mr. Wheaton six years salary and bonus if he resigns related to a change of
control of the Company or is terminated, unless the termination is for
cause.
In
addition to the foregoing, the Company is from time to time the subject of
complaints or litigation from customers alleging injury on properties operated
by the Company, illness or other food quality, health or operational concerns.
Adverse publicity resulting from such allegations may materially adversely
affect the Company and its restaurants, regardless of whether such allegations
are valid or whether the Company is liable. The Company also is the subject of
complaints or allegations from employees from time to time. The Company believes
that the lawsuits, claims and other legal matters to which it has become subject
in the course of its business are not material to the Company's business,
financial condition or results of operations, but an existing or future lawsuit
or claim could result in an adverse decision against the Company that could have
a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and
results of operations.
16
Note (M)
Taxes
The
effective tax rate is approximately 37.3% and 32.5% for the 40-week periods
ended November 2, 2009 and November 3, 2008, respectively. The
Company was able to take advantage of the Credit for Employer Social Security
and Medicare Taxes Paid on certain Employee Tips resulting in a lower effective
tax rate in fiscal 2009. The Company has deferred income tax assets
of $1,756,000 and $2,700,000 on November 2, 2009 and January 26, 2009,
respectively and there are no deferred income tax liabilities. The
Company has booked a $957,000 income tax receivable for tax losses incurred in
the current year. A new temporary IRS ruling allows carrybacks of
these losses for five years. These deferred income tax assets are net of a
valuation allowance of $193,000. The deferred tax asset is primarily the timing
difference on deferred rent and fixed assets. Income taxes for the 12 and 40
weeks ended November 2, 2009 are:
12
weeks
|
40
weeks
|
|||||||
Current
provision (benefit)
|
$ | (900,000 | ) | $ | (957,000 | ) | ||
Deferred
provision
|
274,000 | 1,001,000 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | (626,000 | ) | $ | 44,000 |
Note (N) Insurance
Programs
Historically,
the Company has purchased first dollar insurance for workers’ compensation
claims; high-deductible primary property coverage; and excess policies for
casualty losses. Effective January 1, 2008, the Company modified its
program for insuring casualty losses by lowering the self-insured retention
levels from $2 million per occurrence to $100,000 per
occurrence. Accruals for self-insured casualty losses include
estimates of expected claims payments. Actual liabilities could be
materially different from calculated accruals because of the degree of
estimation required at period ends. The valuation reserves for the
quarters ended November 2, 2009 and November 3, 2008 were $49,000 and $29,000,
respectively.
Note (O) Subsequent
Events
In
November 2009, the Company determined two restaurant leases would not be
renewed. The restaurants in Phoenix, Arizona and Bartlett, Tennessee will be
closed and impaired in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. A pretax
impairment charge of approximately $193,000 with respect to these two properties
will be taken in the fourth fiscal quarter. In addition, the Company
closed owned restaurant properties in Magnolia, Arkansas and Layton,
Utah.
In
November 2009, the Company financed the $920,000 purchase of the land and
building of its Whistle Junction restaurant in South Daytona, Florida with Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A. Wells Fargo increased the existing revolving line of
credit from $2,000,000 to $2,500,000 to permit the Company to complete the
purchase.
17
STAR
BUFFET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
The
following Management’s Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction
with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, and the notes
thereto, presented elsewhere in this report and the Company’s audited
consolidated financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis
included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
January 26, 2009. Comparability among periods may be affected by the
closure of restaurants or the implementation of the Company’s acquisition and
strategic alliance strategies. The costs associated with integrating
new restaurants or under performing or unprofitable restaurants, if any,
acquired or otherwise operated by the Company may have a material adverse effect
on the Company’s results of operations in any individual period.
This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward looking statements, which are
subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may
cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of the Company to be
materially different from any future results, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors
include, among others, the following: general economic and business conditions;
the Company’s success in integrating newly acquired under performing or
unprofitable restaurants; the impact of competitive products and pricing; the
success of operating initiatives; advertising and promotional efforts; adverse
publicity; changes in business strategy or development plans; quality of
management; availability, terms and deployment of capital; changes in prevailing
interest rates and the availability of financing; food, labor, and employee
benefits costs; changes in, or the failure to comply with, government
regulations; weather conditions; construction schedules; implementation of the
Company’s acquisition strategy; the effect of the Company’s accounting polices
and other risks detailed in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
January 26, 2009, and other filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Overview
Consolidated
net loss for the 12-week period ended November 2, 2009 increased approximately
$848,000 to $866,000 or $(0.27) per diluted share as compared with net loss of
$18,000 or $(0.01) per diluted share for the comparable prior year
period. The increase in net loss is due to a decrease in income from
operations of approximately $1,462,000 primarily resulting from higher
impairment costs and lower revenues partially offset by a higher tax benefit.
Total revenues decreased approximately $5.2 million or 25.1% from $20.8 million
in the 12 weeks ended November 3, 2008 to $15.6 million in the 12 weeks ended
November 2, 2009. The decrease in revenues was primarily attributable to eight
closed stores resulting in a sales decline of approximately $2.1 million and
sales declines of approximately $3.4 million in comparable same store
sales. The decline in sales was partially offset by a $300,000
increase attributable to new stores or stores only opened for a portion of the
third quarter of last year.
Consolidated
net income for the 40-week period ended November 2, 2009 decreased approximately
$835,000 to $74,000 or $0.02 per diluted share as compared with net income of
$909,000 or $0.28 per diluted share for the comparable prior year
period. The decrease in net income is due to a decrease in income
from operations of $1,227,000 primarily from higher depreciation and
amortization and impairment of long-lived assets offset by a $306,000 gain on
property disposals related to the fire in Jonesboro, Arkansas and lower general
and administrative costs of approximately $648,000. Total revenues decreased
approximately $14.9 million or 19.1% from $78.3 million in the 40 weeks ended
November 3, 2008 to $63.3 million in the 40 weeks ended November 2, 2009. The
decrease in revenues was primarily attributable to 14 closed stores resulting in
a sales decline of approximately $8.1 million and sales declines of
approximately $8.0 million in comparable same store sales. The
decline in sales was partially offset by a $1.2 million increase attributable to
new stores or stores only opened for a portion of the 40-week period of last
year. The Company believes the decline in same store sales is a
result of weaker economic conditions and due to new restaurant competition in
certain markets. The decline in sales on a same store basis
significantly impacts consolidated net income because occupancy, salaries,
benefits, and other expenses are primarily fixed in nature and generally do not
vary significantly with restaurant sales volume. Occupancy and other expense
includes major expenditures such as rent, insurance, property taxes, utilities,
maintenance and advertising.
18
Recent
Developments
In April
2009, the Company refinanced an existing real estate mortgage by entering into a
$1,194,000 five year fixed rate real estate mortgage with the Bank of Utah. The
mortgage has monthly payments including interest of $10,972. The interest rate
is 7.25%. The mortgage is secured by the HomeTown Buffet in Layton,
Utah and the JB’s restaurant in Vernal, Utah. The Company used the funds to
payoff the previous loan with the Bank of Utah of $696,000 and the balance was
used to reduce the $8,000,000 term loan to Wells Fargo.
In May,
2009, a kitchen fire in a Jonesboro, Arkansas store occurred. The Company has
$800,000 worth of property coverage and $150,000 extra expense coverage subject
to a $100,000 deductible. The Company spent approximately $635,000 to replace
the damaged equipment in the Barnhill’s Buffet and booked a gain of $306,000
after deducting the net carrying value of damaged assets of $229,000 and the
$100,000 deductible. Included in trade receivable is a remaining balance
receivable of $150,000 in insurance proceeds as of November 2,
2009. Total proceeds booked for property coverage from insurance for
this matter was $535,000 as of November 2, 2009. In addition, the
Company has booked $150,000 for business interruption and extra expense coverage
which is included in account receivable at November 2, 2009.
The
Company has evaluated subsequent events through December 16, 2009 which is the
date that these financial statements were filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
In June
2009, the Company opened a 4B’s restaurant in Butte, Montana.
In August
2009, the Company financed part of the $1.1 million purchase of the land and
building of its Whistle Junction restaurant in Titusville, Florida with a real
estate mortgage with the Mainstreet Community Bank of Florida. The
Company entered into a $750,000 fixed rate real estate mortgage amortized on a
twenty-year basis with a balloon payment due August 26, 2014. The mortgage has
monthly payments including interest of $6,100. The interest rate is
7.5%. The mortgage is secured by the Whistle Junction restaurant in
Titusville, Florida.
In
September, 2009, the Company determined two restaurant leases would not be
renewed. The restaurants in Chandler, Arizona and Olympia, Washington were
closed and a pretax impairment charge of approximately $563,000 was taken in the
third quarter of fiscal 2010 for leasehold improvements.
In
October 2009, the Company opened a JB’s Restaurant in Albuquerque, New
Mexico.
Subsequent
to November 2, 2009, the Company determined two restaurant leases would not be
renewed. The restaurants in Phoenix, Arizona and Bartlett, Tennessee were closed
and a pretax impairment charge of approximately $193,000 will be taken in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. The Company also closed owned restaurant
properties in and Layton, Utah and Magnolia, Arkansas on November 8, 2009 and
November 30, 2009, respectively.
Subsequent
to November 2, 2009, the Company financed the $920,000 purchase of the land and
building of its Whistle Junction restaurant in South Daytona, Florida with Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A. Wells Fargo increased the existing revolving line of
credit from $2,000,000 to $2,500,000 to complete the purchase.
19
Components of Income from
Operations
Total
revenues include a combination of food, beverage, merchandise and vending sales
and are net of applicable state and city sales taxes.
Food
costs primarily consist of the cost of food and beverage
items. Various factors beyond the Company’s control, including
adverse weather and natural disasters, may affect food
costs. Accordingly, the Company may incur periodic fluctuations in
food costs. Generally, these temporary increases are absorbed by the
Company and not passed on to customers; however, management may adjust menu
prices to compensate for increased costs of a more permanent
nature.
Labor
costs include restaurant management salaries, bonuses, hourly wages for unit
level employees, various health, life and dental insurance programs, vacations
and sick pay and payroll taxes.
Occupancy
and other expenses are primarily fixed in nature and generally do not vary with
restaurant sales volume. Rent, insurance, property taxes, utilities,
maintenance and advertising account for the major expenditures in this
category.
General
and administrative expenses include all corporate and administrative functions
that serve to support the existing restaurant base and provide the
infrastructure for future growth. Management, supervisory and staff
salaries, employee benefits, data processing, training and office supplies are
the major items of expense in this category.
20
Results of
Operations
The
following table summarizes the Company’s results of operations as a percentage
of total revenues for the 12 and 40 weeks ended November 2, 2009 and November 3,
2008.
Twelve
Weeks Ended
|
Forty
Weeks Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
November
2, 2009 |
November 3,
2008
|
November
2,
2009
|
November
3,
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Costs,
expenses and other
|
||||||||||||||||
Food
costs
|
39.6 | 39.4 | 38.7 | 38.8 | ||||||||||||
Labor costs
|
36.8 | 33.9 | 32.8 | 32.7 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy
and other expenses
|
20.8 | 19.7 | 19.9 | 20.0 | ||||||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
2.5 | 3.1 | 2.6 | 2.9 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
4.3 | 3.0 | 3.6 | 2.6 | ||||||||||||
Impairment
of long-lived assets
|
4.1 | — | 1.7 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||
Gain
on property disposal
|
— | 0.0 | (0.5 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Total
costs and expenses
|
108.1 | 99.1 | 98.8 | 97.3 | ||||||||||||
Income
from operations
|
(8.1 | ) | 0.9 | 1.2 | 2.7 | |||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(1.5 | ) | (1.2 | ) | (1.2 | ) | (1.1 | ) | ||||||||
Interest
income
|
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | ||||||||||||
Other
income
|
0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
(9.5 | ) | (0.2 | ) | 0.2 | 1.7 | ||||||||||
Income
taxes (benefit)
|
(4.0 | ) | (0.1 | ) | 0.1 | 0.5 | ||||||||||
Net
income
|
(5.5 | )% | (0.1 | )% | 0.1 | % | 1.2 | % | ||||||||
Effective
income tax rate
|
(42.0 | )% | (60.9 | )% | 37.3 | % | 32.5 | % |
Summarized
financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments is shown in
the following table. The other assets presented in the condensed consolidated
balance sheet and not in the reportable segments relate to the Company as a
whole, and not individual segments. Also certain corporate overhead income and
expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations are not included
in the reportable segments.
(Dollars
in Thousands)
40
weeks Ended
November 2,
2009
|
Buffet
Division (1)
|
Non-Buffet
Division(2)
|
Other
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 41,592 | $ | 21,690 | $ | — | $ | 63,282 | ||||||||
Food
cost
|
17,829 | 6,648 | — | 24,477 | ||||||||||||
Labor
cost
|
13,211 | 7,573 | — | 20,784 | ||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
— | — | 75 | 75 | ||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(2 | ) | — | (753 | ) | (755 | ) | |||||||||
Depreciation
& amortization
|
1,552 | 667 | 27 | 2,246 | ||||||||||||
Impairment
of long-lived assets
|
934 | 146 | — | 1,080 | ||||||||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
(586 | ) | 2,761 | (2,057 | ) | 118 |
21
40
weeks Ended
November 3,
2008
|
Buffet
Division (1)
|
Non-Buffet
Division(2)
|
Other
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 57,773 | $ | 20,453 | $ | — | $ | 78,226 | ||||||||
Food
cost
|
23,771 | 6,615 | — | 30,386 | ||||||||||||
Labor
cost
|
18,056 | 7,498 | — | 25,554 | ||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
— | — | 13 | 13 | ||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(5 | ) | — | (832 | ) | (837 | ) | |||||||||
Depreciation
& amortization
|
1,543 | 442 | 89 | 2,074 | ||||||||||||
Impairment
of long-lived assets
|
198 | 14 | — | 212 | ||||||||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
2,116 | 2,019 | (2,789 | ) | 1,346 |
(1) The
sales decrease was primarily from declines in comparable same store sales and 11
closed restaurants. The food cost as a percentage of revenue
increased this year primarily due to increases in wholesale food prices as
compared to the prior year. Income (loss) before income taxes
decreased primarily as a result of the decline in revenue and increases in food
and impairment expense.
(2) The
sales increased due to the addition of five Non-Buffet restaurants with sales of
approximately $1.9 million partially offset by the closure of three Non-Buffet
restaurants with net loss of sales of approximately $486,000. The
food cost as a percentage of revenue decreased this year primarily due to lower
food costs in the Casa Bonita concept. Due to an additional Casa Bonita store
opening at the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we had a higher mix of
these revenues associated with the lower food costs of that concept this year
since the additional store has been open for forty weeks in the current
year. Labor cost decreased as a percentage of revenue this year
primarily due to lower management labor costs compared to the prior
year. Income (loss) before income taxes increased primarily as a
result of lower food and labor costs.
Total
revenues decreased approximately $5.2 million or 25.1% from $20.8 million in the
12 weeks ended November 3, 2008 to $15.6 million in the 12 weeks ended November
2, 2009. The decrease in revenues was primarily attributable to eight closed
stores resulting in a sales decline of approximately $2.1 million and sales
declines of approximately $3.4 million in comparable same store
sales. The decline in sales was partially offset by a $300,000
increase attributable to new stores or stores only opened for a portion of the
third quarter of last year. Total revenues decreased approximately
$14.9 million or 19.1% from $78.3 million in the 40 weeks ended November 3, 2008
to $63.3 million in the 40 weeks ended November 2, 2009. The decrease in
revenues was primarily attributable to 14 closed stores resulting in a sales
decline of approximately $8.1 million and sales declines of approximately $8.0
million in comparable same store sales. The decline in sales was
partially offset by $1.2 million increase attributable to new stores or stores
only opened for a portion of the 40-week period of last year.
Food
costs as a percentage of total revenues increased from 39.4% during the 12-week
period ended November 3, 2008 to 39.6% during the 12-week period ended November
2, 2009, and decreased from 38.8% during the 40-week period ended November 3,
2008 to 38.7% during the 40-week period ended November 2, 2009. The increase for
the 12-week period ended November 2, 2009 as a percentage of total revenues was
primarily attributable to a generally lower revenue base. The decrease for the
40-week period ended November 2, 2009 as a percentage of total revenues was
primarily attributable to lower food costs in the non-buffet
restaurants. The non-buffet restaurants traditionally have lower food
cost as a percentage of revenues than the buffet restaurants. The
non-buffet restaurants contributed a higher percentage of total sales during the
current fiscal year as compared to the same periods in the prior year, therefore
lowering the overall food cost this year as a percentage of sales.
22
Labor
costs as a percentage of total revenues increased from 33.9% during the 12-week
period ended November 3, 2008 to 36.8% during the 12-week period ended November
2, 2009, and from 32.7% during the 40-week period ended November 3, 2008 to
32.8% during the 40-week period ended November 2, 2009. The increase
as a percentage of total revenues was primarily attributable to the introduction
of new management bonus program and lower revenue. The decrease in total dollars
of approximately $1.3 million and $4.8 million, respectively, was primarily the
result of the decrease in total revenues. With minimum wage increases scheduled
to take effect in January 2010 the labor percentage may increase in the
future.
Occupancy
and other expenses as a percentage of total revenues increased from 19.7% during
the 12-week period ended November 3, 2008 to 20.8% during the 12-week period
ended November 2, 2009, and decreased from 20.0% during the 40-week period ended
November 3, 2008 to 19.9% during the 40-week period ended November 2,
2009. The increase in the 12-week period ending November 2, 2009 was
primarily attributable to higher utility costs as a percentage of
revenue. The decrease for the 40-week period ending November 2, 2009
as a percentage of total revenues was primarily attributable to a decrease in
facility costs as a percentage of revenues in the current year compared to the
prior year.
General
and administrative expense as a percentage of total revenues decreased from 3.1%
during the 12-week period ended November 3, 2008 to 2.5% during the 12-week
period ended November 2, 2009, and from 2.9% during the 40-week period ended
November 3, 2008 to 2.6% during the 40-week period ended November 2,
2009. The decrease for the 12 and 40-week periods ending
November 2, 2009 as a percentage of total revenues was primarily attributable to
lower royalties, insurance costs and field costs as compared to the same periods
of the prior year.
Depreciation
and amortization expense increased from $615,000 during the 12-week period ended
November 3, 2008 to $667,000 during the 12-week period ended November 2, 2009,
and increased from $2,074,000 during the 40-week period ended November 3, 2008
to $2,246,000 during the 40-week period ended November 2, 2009. The increase was
primarily attributable the acquisition of additional assets.
Interest
expense increased from (1.2)% during the 12-week period ended November 3, 2008
to (1.5)% during the 12-week period ended November 2, 2009, and from (1.1)%
during the 40-week period ended November 3, 2008 to (1.2)% during the 40-week
period ended November 2, 2009. The increase was attributable to lower
revenues despite lower average debt balances and lower interest rates in the
first three quarters of fiscal 2010 as compared to fiscal 2009.
Interest
income remained flat during the 12-week period ended November 3, 2008 and the
12-week period ended November 2, 2009, and increased from 0.0% during the
40-week period ended November 3, 2008 to 0.1% during the 40-week period ended
November 2, 2009. Interest income was primarily generated by the Company’s tax
refund in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Other
income is primarily rental income from the Company’s leased properties. Rental
income was $10,000 and $22,000, respectively, for one property leased for the
entire 12-week period ended November 2, 2009 and November 3,
2008. Rental income was $31,000 for one property leased for the
entire 40-week period ended November 2, 2009. Rental income was
$61,000 for one property leased for part of the first quarter and one property
leased for the entire 40-week period ended November 3, 2008. The
Company also had other income in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 of
approximately $15,000 on the settlement of debt regarding the purchase of the
Western Sizzlin in Magnolia, Arkansas.
The
income tax provision (benefit) totaled $(626,000) or (42.0)% of pre-tax income
for the 12-week period ended November 2, 2009 as compared to $(28,000) or
(60.9)% of pre-tax income for the 12-week period ended November 3,
2008. The income tax provision totaled $44,000 or 37.3% of pre-tax
income for the 40-week period ended November 2, 2009 as compared to $437,000 or
32.5% of pre-tax income for the 40-week period ended November 3, 2008. The
increase of pre-tax income as a percentage of taxable income was primarily
attributable to the Company being unable to currently utilize all of its tax
credits.
23
Impact of
Inflation
The
impact of inflation on the cost of food, labor, equipment and construction and
remodeling of stores could affect the Company’s operations. Many of
the Company’s employees are paid hourly rates related to federal and state
minimum wage laws so that
changes in these laws can result in higher labor costs to the Company. In
addition, the cost of food commodities utilized by the Company is subject to
market supply and demand pressures. Shifts in these costs may have an
impact on the Company’s food costs. The Company anticipates that
modest increases in these costs can be offset through pricing and other cost
control efforts; however, there is no assurance that the Company would be able
to pass more significant costs on to its customers or if it were able to do so,
it could do so in a short period of time.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
In recent
years, the Company has financed operations through a combination of cash on
hand, cash provided from operations, available borrowings under bank lines of
credit and loans from the principal shareholder.
As of
November 2, 2009, the Company had $930,000 in cash. Cash and cash
equivalents decreased by $188,000 during the 40 weeks ended November 2, 2009.
The net working capital deficit was $(6,705,000) and $(9,041,000) at November 2,
2009 and January 26, 2009, respectively. Total cash provided by operations for
the 40 weeks ended November 2, 2009 was approximately $1,795,000 as compared to
approximately $3,278,000 in the 40 weeks ended November 3, 2008. The
Company spent approximately $2,413,000 on capital expenditures in the first
three quarters of fiscal 2010.
The
Company has Credit Facility with Wells Fargo Bank N.A. consisting of $8,000,000
term loan and a $2,000,000 revolving line of credit. On November 30, 2009,
Wells Fargo increased the Company’s $2,000,000 revolving line of credit to
$2,500,000 to partly facilitate the purchase of property in South Daytona,
Florida. The Credit Facility is guaranteed by Star Buffet’s
subsidiaries and bears interest, at the Company’s option, at Wells Fargo’s base
rate plus 0.25% or at LIBOR plus 2.00%. The Credit Facility is secured by
a first priority lien on all of the Company’s assets, except for those assets
that were pledged as security for obligations existing as of January 31, 2008,
in which case Wells Fargo has a second lien. The term loan matures on
January 31, 2012 and provides for principal to be amortized at $175,000 per
quarter for the initial six quarters; $225,000 for the next nine quarters; and
any remaining balance to be paid at maturity. Interest is payable
monthly. The term loan balance was $4,675,000 on December 9,
2009. The $2,500,000 revolving line of credit matures on January 31,
2012. Interest on the revolver is payable monthly. As of December 9,
2009, the revolving line of credit balance was $2,250,000.
During
fiscal 2008, the Company borrowed approximately $1,400,000 from Mr. Robert
E. Wheaton, a principal shareholder, officer and director of the Company.
This loan dated June 15, 2007 is subordinated to the obligation to Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A. and bears interest at 8.5%. In June, 2008, the Company borrowed
an additional $592,000 from Mr. Wheaton under the same terms. This resulted in
an increase in the subordinated note balance from $1,400,000 to
$1,992,000. The Company expensed and paid $130,000 to Mr. Wheaton for
interest during the first three quarters of fiscal 2010. The principal balance
and any unpaid interest is due and payable in full on June 5,
2012. The Company used the funds borrowed from Mr. Wheaton for
working capital requirements.
In April
2009, the Company refinanced an existing real estate mortgage by entering into a
$1,194,000 five year fixed rate real estate mortgage with the Bank of Utah. The
mortgage has monthly payments including interest of $10,972. The interest rate
is 7.25%. The mortgage is secured by the HomeTown Buffet in Layton, Utah and the
JB’s restaurant in Vernal, Utah. The Company used the funds to payoff the
previous loan with the Bank of Utah of $696,000 and to reduce the Company’s
obligation on the term loan to Wells Fargo.
24
In August
2009, the Company financed part of the $1.1 million purchase of the land and
building of its Whistle Junction restaurant in Titusville, Florida with a real
estate mortgage with the Mainstreet Community Bank of Florida. The
Company entered into a $750,000 fixed rate real estate mortgage amortized on a
twenty-year basis with a balloon payment due August 26, 2014. The mortgage has
monthly payments including interest of $6,100. The interest rate is
7.5%. The mortgage is secured by the Whistle Junction restaurant in
Titusville, Florida.
The
Company believes that cash on hand, availability under the revolving line of
credit and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to satisfy working
capital, capital expenditure and refinancing requirements during the next 12
months. Additionally, management does not believe that the net
working capital deficit will have any material effect on the Company’s ability
to operate the business or meet obligations as they come
due. However, there can be no assurance that cash on hand,
availability under the revolving line of credit and cash flow from operations
will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital, capital expenditure and
refinancing requirements. Furthermore, given uncertain financial
market conditions, on February 20, 2009, the Board of Directors voted to
indefinitely suspend the annual dividend on the outstanding common stock of the
Company.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Judgments
The
Company prepares its condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Company's condensed
consolidated financial statements are based on the application of certain
accounting policies, the most significant of which are described in Note
1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in the Company’s Annual
Report filed on Form 10-K. Certain of these policies require numerous estimates
and strategic or economic assumptions that may prove inaccurate or be subject to
variations that may significantly affect the Company's reported results and
financial position for the reported period or in future periods. Changes in
underlying factors, assumptions or estimates in any of these areas could have a
material impact on the Company's future financial condition and results of
operations. The Company considers the following policies to be the most critical
in understanding the judgments that are involved in preparing its consolidated
financial statements.
Property,
Buildings and Equipment
Property
and equipment and real property under capitalized leases are carried at cost
less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization
are provided using the straight-line method over the following useful
lives:
Years
|
|
Buildings
|
40
|
Building
improvements
|
15
– 20
|
Furniture,
fixtures and equipment
|
5 –
8
|
Leasehold
improvements are amortized over the lesser of the life of the lease or the
estimated economic life of the assets. The life of the lease includes renewal
options determined by management at lease inception for which failure to renew
would result in a substantial economic penalty.
Repairs
and maintenance are charged to operations as incurred. Remodeling costs are
generally capitalized.
The
Company's accounting policies regarding buildings and equipment include certain
management judgments regarding the estimated useful lives of such assets, the
residual values to which the assets are depreciated and the determination as to
what constitutes increasing the life of existing assets. These judgments and
estimates may produce materially different amounts of depreciation and
amortization expense than would be reported if different assumptions were used.
As discussed further below, these judgments may also impact the Company's need
to recognize an impairment charge on the carrying amount of these assets as the
cash flows associated with the assets are realized.
25
Impairment
of Goodwill
Goodwill
represents the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of the net
assets acquired in connection with business acquisitions. The Company reviews
goodwill for possible impairment on an annual basis or when triggering events
occur in accordance with ASC 350. ASC 350 requires goodwill to be
tested for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is an operating segment
or one level below an operating segment. The Company considers each
individual restaurant to be a reporting unit and therefore reviews goodwill for
possible impairment by restaurant.
The
Company utilizes a two-part impairment test. First, the fair value of
the reporting unit is compared to carrying value (including
goodwill). If the carrying value is greater than the fair value, the
second step is performed. In the second step, the implied fair value
of the reporting unit goodwill is compared to the carrying amount of
goodwill. If the carrying value is greater, a loss is recognized. The
goodwill impairment test considers the impact of current conditions and the
economic outlook for the restaurant industry, the general overall economic
outlook including market data, and governmental and environmental factors, in
establishing the assumptions used to compute the fair value of each reporting
unit. We also take into account the historical, current and future
(based on probability) operating results of each reporting unit and any other
facts and data pertinent to valuing the reporting units in our impairment
test.
The
Company has an independent evaluation of goodwill conducted every three
years. The most recent independent valuation was conducted as of
February 1, 2008.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
The
Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment in accordance with ASC 360,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. The Company
assesses whether an impairment write-down is necessary for locations whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset
may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured
by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net
cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such asset is considered to
be impaired, the impairment loss to be recognized is measured by the amount by
which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the
asset.
Judgments
made by the Company related to the expected useful lives of long-lived assets
and the ability of the Company to realize undiscounted cash flows in excess of
the carrying amounts of such assets are affected by factors such as the ongoing
maintenance and improvements of the assets, changes in economic conditions, and
changes in operating performance. As the Company assesses the ongoing expected
cash flows and carrying amounts of its long-lived assets, these factors could
cause the Company to realize a material impairment charge.
Insurance
Programs
Historically,
the Company has purchased first dollar insurance for workers’ compensation
claims; high-deductible primary property coverage; and excess policies for
casualty losses. Effective January 1, 2008, the Company modified its
program for insuring casualty losses by lowering the self-insured retention
levels from $2 million per occurrence to $100,000 per
occurrence. Accruals for self-insured casualty losses include
estimates of expected claims payments. Because of large, self-insured
retention levels, actual liabilities could be materially different from
calculated accruals.
26
Commitments
and Contractual Obligations
The
Company’s contractual obligations and commitments principally include
obligations associated with our outstanding indebtedness and future minimum
operating and capital lease obligations of its wholly-owned direct and indirect
independently capitalized subsidiaries as set forth in the following
table:
Contractual Obligations:
|
Total
|
Less
than
one year
|
One
to
three years
|
Three
to
five years
|
Greater
than
five years
|
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term
debt
|
$ | 14,680 | $ | 1,903 | $ | 8,443 | $ | 3,150 | $ | 1,184 | ||||||||||
Operating
leases
|
10,893 | 2,232 | 3,083 | 1,915 | 3,663 | |||||||||||||||
Capital
leases
|
13 | 13 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Purchase
commitments
|
920 | 920 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Total
contractual cash obligations
|
$ | 26,506 | $ | 5,068 | $ | 11,526 | $ | 5,065 | $ | 4,847 |
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of
December 9, 2009, the Company did not have off-balance sheet arrangements as
defined in Item 303(a) (4) (ii) of Regulation S-K.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
None.
ACCOUNTING
PRONOUNCEMENTS NOT YET ADOPTED
Variable Interest Entities and
Transfers of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities: The pronouncement on transfers of financial
assets and extinguishments of liabilities removes the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity and removes the exception from applying variable interest
entity accounting to qualifying special-purpose entities. The new guidance on
variable interest entities requires an entity to perform an ongoing analysis to
determine whether the entity’s variable interest or interests give it a
controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. The pronouncements
are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The
Company will adopt the pronouncements for interim and annual reporting periods
beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The Company does not anticipate
the adoption of this pronouncement will have any impact on its consolidated
financial statements.
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
The
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), is recorded, processed,
summarized, and reported within the required time periods and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, as appropriate, to
allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
27
As
required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, we conducted an evaluation,
under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including
the Chief Executive Officer and the Principal Accounting Officer, of the
effectiveness and the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Principal Accounting Officer
have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
the end of the period covered by this report.
Our
principal executive officer and principal accounting officer assessed the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of
January 26, 2009 and identified two significant deficiencies which are noted
below. A significant deficiency is a control deficiency, or
combination of control deficiencies, that adversely affects the entity’s ability
to initiate, authorize, record, process, or report financial data reliably in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles such that there is more
than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the entity’s financial
statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or
detected by the entity’s internal control. A material weakness is a
significant deficiency, or a combination of significant deficiencies, that
results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the
consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected by the
entity’s internal control. In making this assessment, management used
the criteria established in Internal Control–Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(“COSO”). The two significant deficiencies identified
included:
|
·
|
Inadequate
segregation of duties (significant
deficiency);
|
|
·
|
Incorrect
application of gain contingency (significant
deficiency).
|
As of
November 2, 2009, the significant deficiency for inadequate segregation of
duties still exists. This significant deficiency has been
communicated to the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and
the audit committee and has been taken into account by the Company’s principal
executive officer and principal accounting officer in reviewing the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting. Based on the foregoing, these
officers have concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting remains ineffective due to the same factors that were assessed at
January 26, 2009.
There
have been no changes to our internal control over financial reporting identified
in connection with our evaluation that occurred during our latest fiscal quarter
of 2010 that materially affects, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
PART
II: OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
The
Company is from time to time the subject of complaints or litigation from
customers alleging injury on properties operated by the Company, illness related
to food quality or operational concerns. Adverse publicity resulting from such
allegations may materially adversely affect the Company and its restaurants,
regardless of whether such allegations are valid or whether the Company is
liable. The Company also is the subject of complaints or allegations from
employees from time to time. The Company believes that generally the lawsuits,
claims and other legal matters to which it is subject to in the ordinary course
of its business are not material to the Company's business, financial condition
or results of operations, but an existing or future lawsuit or claim could
result in an adverse decision against the Company that could have a material
adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of
operations.
28
Item
1A. Risk Factors
There
have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in Part 1, Item 1A
of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2009.
Item
5. Other Information
None.
29
Item
6. Exhibits
(a)
|
The
following exhibits are attached to this report:
|
||
Exhibit
|
Description
|
||
Number
|
|
of Exhibit
|
|
3.1
|
Certificate
of Incorporation*
|
||
3.2
|
Bylaws,
as amended on September 22, 1997*
|
||
4.1
|
Form
of Common Stock Certificate**
|
||
|
31.1
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
||
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
||
32.2
|
Certification
of Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
||
99.1
|
Press
release dated December 16, 2009.
|
*
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-1,
Amendment No. 1 (Registration No. 333- 32249).
**
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-1,
Amendment No. 2 (Registration No. 333- 32249).
30
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto
duly authorized.
STAR BUFFET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES | |||
December
16, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ Robert E. Wheaton | |
Robert
E. Wheaton
Chairman
of the Board,
President,
Chief Executive Officer and
Principal
Executive Officer
|
|||
December 16, 2009 | By: | /s/ Ronald E. Dowdy | |
Ronald
E. Dowdy
Group
Controller,
Treasurer,
Secretary and
Principal
Accounting Officer
|
31