STAR GROUP, L.P. - Quarter Report: 2007 March (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007

OR

For the transition period from             to             

Commission File Number: 001-14129

Commission File Number: 333-103873

STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P.

STAR GAS FINANCE COMPANY

(Exact name of registrants as specified in its charters)

(203) 328-7310

(Registrants’ telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are large accelerated filers, accelerated filers, or non-accelerated filers. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

    Large accelerated filer  ¨    Accelerated filer  x    Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are shell companies (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

At April 30, 2007 the registrants had units and shares of each issuer’s classes of common stock outstanding as follows:

Table of Contents

STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

2

Table of Contents

STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMNTS (UNAUDITED)

1) Partnership Organization

Star Gas Partners, L.P. (“Star Gas Partners,” the “Partnership,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) is a home heating oil distributor and services provider with one reportable operating segment that principally provides services to residential and commercial customers to heat their homes and buildings. Star Gas Partners is a master limited partnership, which at March 31, 2007 had outstanding 75.8 million common units (NYSE: “SGU” representing an 99.6% limited partner interest in Star Gas Partners) and 0.3 million general partner units (representing an 0.4% general partner interest in Star Gas Partners).

The Partnership is organized as follows:

2) Restatement of Financial Information

On December 26, 2006, our management and the audit committee of our general partner determined that it was necessary to amend and restate the Partnership’s financial statements prior to September 30, 2006 with respect to the accounting and disclosures for certain derivative transactions under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”) and for the amortization of an unrecognized gain in the calculation of pension expense. As reported in the Partnership’s September 30, 2006 Form 10-K, we restated our historical balance sheet as of September 30, 2005; our statements of operations, cash flows and partners’ capital for fiscal 2005 and 2004; and financial information for the fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2006, March 31, 2006, December 31, 2005, September 30, 2005, June 30, 2005, March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004.

Prior to the restatement, the changes in fair value of derivative instruments that were designated as cash flow hedges were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income until the forecasted transaction affected earnings. As a result of the restatement, those changes in fair value of derivative instruments are recorded in change in the fair value of derivative instruments in the statements of operations. In addition, the change in fair value of derivative instruments that were not designated as a hedge pursuant to SFAS 133, were previously classified in cost of product. The fair value of derivative instruments were previously classified in prepaid expenses and other current assets. The Partnership has reclassified these amounts to fair asset value of derivative instruments and fair liability value of derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheets for all periods presented.

As a result of the restatement for the three months ended March 31, 2006, net income increased by $10.5 million due to the effect of derivative transactions, which positively impacted the change in the fair value of derivative instruments by $11.2 million and increased cost of product by $0.7 million. For the six months ended March 31, 2006, net income was reduced by $30.4 million due to the effect of derivative transactions, which negatively impacted the change in the fair value of derivative instruments by $29.3 million and increased cost of product by $1.0 million.

As of March 31, 2006, the balance in prepaid expenses and other current assets was reduced by $9.4 million to reflect a reclassification of $3.3 million to fair asset value of derivative instruments and a reduction to prepaid pension expense of $6.1 million. Long-term liabilities were reduced by $6.1 million, as the $6.1 million reclassification from prepaid pension expense was netted against the minimum pension obligation. Partners’ capital increased by $4.6 million and accumulated other comprehensive (loss) increased by $4.6 million to reflect the effects relating to derivative transactions of $3.1 million and the cumulative unrecognized pension gain of $1.5 million.

7

Table of Contents

The following tables set forth the effects of the restatement relating to derivatives transactions on affected line items within our previously reported financial statements for the three and six months ended March 31, 2006.

3) Recapitalization

Effective as of April 28, 2006, the Partnership completed a recapitalization of the Partnership.

In connection with the recapitalization, the Partnership received an aggregate of $50.2 million, after expenses of $7.5 million, in new equity financing through the sale of an aggregate of 26.4 million common units. The Partnership also repurchased $65.3 million in face amount of its existing notes, and converted $26.9 million in face amount of existing notes into 13.4 million common units at a conversion price of $2.00 per unit and exchanged $165.3 million in principal amount of existing notes for a like amount of new notes that were issued under a new indenture. The Partnerships’ senior and junior subordinated units were converted into common units.

In addition, the Partnership entered into an amended indenture for the $7.6 million in face amount of existing notes that remained outstanding that removed the restrictive covenants from the existing indenture.

4) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Star Gas Partners, L.P. and its subsidiaries. All material intercompany items and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The financial information included herein is unaudited; however, such information reflects all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair statement of financial condition and results for the interim periods. The results of operations for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

These interim financial statements of the Partnership have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and should be read in conjunction with the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2006.

8

Table of Contents

Reclassification

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

Sales of heating oil and other fuels are recognized at the time of delivery of the product to the customer and sales of heating and air conditioning equipment are recognized at the time of installation. Revenue from repairs and maintenance service is recognized upon completion of the service. Payments received from customers for heating oil equipment service contracts are deferred and amortized into income over the terms of the respective service contracts, on a straight-line basis, which generally do not exceed one year. To the extent that the Partnership anticipates that future costs for fulfilling its contractual obligations under its service maintenance contracts will exceed the amount of deferred revenue currently attributable to these contracts, the Partnership recognizes a loss in current period earnings equal to the amount that anticipated future costs exceed related deferred revenues.

Basic and Diluted Net Income per Limited Partner Unit

Net income per limited partner unit is computed by dividing net income, after deducting the general partner’s interest, by the weighted average number of common units, senior subordinated units and junior subordinated units outstanding. Each unit in each of the partnership’s ownership classes participates in net income equally.

Cash Equivalents

The Partnership considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less, when purchased, to be cash equivalents.

Inventories

At September 30, 2005, the Partnership’s inventory of heating oil and other fuels were stated at the lower of cost or market computed on the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Effective October 1, 2005, the Partnership changed from the FIFO method to the weighted average cost (WAC) method for heating oil and other fuels. All other inventories, representing parts and equipment have been and continue to be stated at the lower of cost or market using the FIFO method. (See Note 5 Change in Accounting Principle)

Weather Insurance Contract

Weather insurance contract is recorded in accordance with the intrinsic value method defined by the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 99-2, “Accounting for Weather Derivatives.” The premium paid is amortized over the life of the contract and the intrinsic value method is applied at each interim period.

9

Table of Contents

Property, Plant, and Equipment

Property, plant, and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful lives of the depreciable assets using the straight-line method.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill and intangible assets include goodwill, customer lists and covenants not to compete.

Goodwill is the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets in the acquisition of a company. In accordance with Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but instead are annually tested for impairment. Also in accordance with this standard, intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.”

Customer lists are the names and addresses of the acquired company’s customers. Based on the historical retention experience, these lists are amortized on a straight-line basis over seven to ten years.

Covenants not to compete are agreements established with the owners of an acquired company and are amortized over the respective lives of the covenants on a straight-line basis, which are generally five years.

Partners’ Capital

Comprehensive income includes net income, plus certain other items that are recorded directly to partners’ capital. Accumulated other comprehensive income reported on the Partnerships’ consolidated balance sheets consists of unrealized losses on pension plan obligations. For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, comprehensive income was comprised of net income of $74,879 and $54,069 respectively. For the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, comprehensive income was comprised of net income of $79,595 and $25,728 respectively.

Income Taxes

The Partnership is a master limited partnership and is not subject to tax at the entity level for federal and state income tax purposes. Rather, any income and losses of the Partnership are allocated directly to the individual partners. Except for the Partnership’s corporate subsidiaries, no recognition has been given to federal income taxes in the accompanying financial statements of the Partnership. While the Partnership’s corporate subsidiaries will generate non-qualifying Master Limited Partnership revenue, distributions from the corporate subsidiaries to the Partnership are generally included in the determination of qualified Master Limited Partnership income. All or a portion of the distributions received by the Partnership from the corporate subsidiaries could be taxable as either a dividend or capital gain to the partners.

The accompanying financial statements are reported on a fiscal year basis, however, the Partnership and its Corporate subsidiaries file state and federal income tax returns on a calendar year basis.

For corporate subsidiaries of the Partnership, a consolidated Federal income tax return is filed. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amount of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

Sales, Use and Value Added Taxes

Taxes are assessed by various governmental authorities on many different types of transactions. Sales reported for product, installation and service excludes taxes.

10

Table of Contents

Derivatives and Hedging

SFAS 133 established accounting and reporting standards requiring that derivative instruments be recorded at fair value and included in the consolidated balance sheet as assets or liabilities. To the extent derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges are effective and SFAS 133 documentation requirements have been met, changes in fair value are recognized in other comprehensive income until the underlying hedged item is recognized in earnings. Currently, none of the Partnership’s derivatives qualify for hedge accounting treatment.

5) Change in Accounting Principle

At September 30, 2005, the Partnership’s inventory of heating oil and other fuels were stated at the lower of cost or market computed on the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.

Effective October 1, 2005, the Partnership changed from the FIFO method to the weighted average cost (WAC) method for its inventory of heating oil and other fuels. All other inventories, representing parts and equipment, have been and continue to be stated at the lower of cost or market using the FIFO method. The Partnership believes that the WAC methodology is preferable in the circumstances because it reflects a more accurate correlation between revenues and product costs experienced in the Partnerships business environment by normalizing the carrying cost of heating oil and other fuels given the increasing short-term volatility in the marketplace for these products. The cumulative effect of this change as of October 1, 2005 decreased net income by $0.3 million for fiscal year ended September 30, 2006.

6) Goodwill and Intangibles, net

A summary of changes in the Partnership’s goodwill is as follows (in thousands):

Intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following (in thousands):

Amortization expense for intangible assets was $10.3 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 compared to $10.2 million for the six months ended March 31, 2006. Total estimated annual amortization expense related to intangible assets subject to amortization, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2007, and the four succeeding fiscal years ending September 30, is as follows (in thousands):

11

Table of Contents

7) Acquisitions

During fiscal year 2007, the Partnership acquired two retail heating oil dealers. The aggregate purchase price was approximately $2.2 million.

The Partnership made no acquisitions in fiscal 2006.

The acquired assets and assumed liabilities were recorded at fair value based on valuations and estimates. The excess of the cost of acquired net assets over fair value was recorded as goodwill. Estimates used to determine fair value may be subject to change.

The following table indicates the allocation of the aggregate purchase price paid and the respective periods of amortization assigned for fiscal 2007 acquisitions (in thousands):

8) Employee Pension Plan

The Partnership is not required to contribute to its plans during fiscal 2007 to fund its pension obligations.

12

Table of Contents

9) Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information

10) Commitments and Contingencies

On or about October 21, 2004, a purported class action lawsuit on behalf of a purported class of unitholders was filed against the Partnership and various subsidiaries and officers and directors in the United States District Court of the District of Connecticut entitled Carter v. Star Gas Partners, L.P., et al, No. 3:04-cv-01766-IBA, et al. Subsequently, 16 additional class action complaints, alleging the same or substantially similar claims, were filed in the same district court collectively referred to herein as the “Class Action Complaints”). The class actions have been consolidated into one action entitled In re Star Gas Securities Litigation, No 3:04cv1766 (JBA).

The class action plaintiffs generally allege that the Partnership violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated hereunder, by purportedly failing to disclose, among other things: (1) problems with the restructuring of Star Gas’s dispatch system and customer attrition related thereto; (2) that Star Gas’ business process improvement program was not generating the benefits allegedly claimed; (3) that Star Gas was struggling to maintain its profit margins; (4) that Star Gas’s fiscal 2004 second quarter profit margins were not representative of its ability to pass on heating oil price increases; and (5) that Star Gas was facing an inability to pay its debts and that, as a result, its credit rating and ability to obtain future financing was in jeopardy. The class action plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount of compensatory damages including interest against the defendants jointly and severally and an award of reasonable costs and expenses. On February 23, 2005, the Court consolidated the Class Action Complaints and heard argument on motions for the appointment of lead plaintiff. On April 8, 2005, the Court appointed the lead plaintiff. Pursuant to the Court’s order, the lead plaintiff filed a consolidated amended complaint on June 20, 2005 (the “Consolidated Amended Complaint”). The Consolidated Amended Complaint named: (a) Star Gas Partners, L.P.; (b) Star Gas LLC; (c) Irik Sevin; (d) Audrey Sevin; (e) Hanseatic Americas, Inc.; (f) Paul Biddelman; (g) Ami Trauber; (h) A.G. Edwards & Sons Inc.; (i) UBS Investment Bank; and (j) RBC Dain Rauscher Inc. as defendants. The Consolidated Amended Complaint added claims arising out of two registration statements and the same transactions under Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 as well as certain allegations concerning the Partnership’s hedging practices. On September 23, 2005, defendants filed motions to dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim under the federal securities laws and failure to satisfy the applicable pleading requirements of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 or PSLRA, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On July 27, 2006, the Court heard oral argument on the pending motions to dismiss. On August 21, 2006, the court issued its rulings on defendants’ motions to dismiss, granting the motions and dismissing the consolidated amended complaint in its entirety. On August 23, 2006, the court entered a judgment of dismissal. On September 7, 2006, the plaintiffs moved for reconsideration and to alter and reopen the court’s August 23, 2006 judgment of dismissal and for leave to file a second consolidated amended complaint (“Plaintiffs’ Post-Judgment Motion”). On October 20, 2006, defendants filed their memorandum of law in opposition to the Plaintiffs’ Post-Judgment Motion. Plaintiffs filed their reply brief on or about November 20, 2006. On March 22, 2007 the Court issued its decision denying Plaintiffs’ Post-Judgment Motion.

On April 3, 2007, the Star Gas Defendants filed a Motion for a Mandatory Rule 11 Inquiry and fee shifting which seeks recovery of Defendants’ legal fees pursuant to the PSLRA. On April 24, 2007, class plaintiffs filed their opposition to that motion. The Star Gas Defendants’ reply is due on May 8, 2007.

On April 20, 2007, class plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Second Court of Judge Arterton’s decisions dismissing the amended complaint and denying Plaintiffs’ Post-Judgment Motion. In the interim, discovery in the matter remains stayed pursuant to the mandatory stay provisions of the PSLRA. While no prediction may be made as to the outcome of litigation, we intend to defend against this class action vigorously.

13

Table of Contents

In the event that the above action is decided adversely to us, it could have a material effect on our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

The Partnership’s operations are subject to all operating hazards and risks normally incidental to handling, storing and transporting and otherwise providing for use by consumers of combustible liquids such as propane and home heating oil.

As a result, at any given time the Partnership is a defendant in various legal proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. The Partnership maintains insurance policies with insurers in amounts and with coverages and deductibles we believe are reasonable and prudent. However, the Partnership cannot assure that this insurance will be adequate to protect it from all material expenses related to potential future claims for personal and property damage or that these levels of insurance will be available in the future at economical prices. In addition, the occurrence of an explosion may have an adverse effect on the public’s desire to use the Partnership products. In the opinion of management, except as described above the Partnership is not a party to any litigation, which individually or in the aggregate could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

11) Earnings Per Limited Partner Units

12) Subsequent Events

In May 2007, the Partnership purchased the customer lists and assets of a heating oil dealership in New York for $3.8 million.

14

Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Disclosure

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes “forward-looking statements” which represent our expectations or beliefs concerning future events that involve risks and uncertainties, including those associated with, the effect of weather conditions on our financial performance, the price and supply of home heating oil, the consumption patterns of our customers, our ability to obtain satisfactory gross profit margins, our ability to obtain new accounts and retain existing accounts, our ability to effect strategic acquisitions or redeploy assets, the impact of litigation, the continuing impact of the business process redesign project and our ability to address issues related to that project, our ability to contract for our current and future supply needs, natural gas conversions, future union relations and outcome of current and future union negotiations, the impact of future environmental, health, and safety regulations, customer credit worthiness, and marketing plans. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this Report including, without limitation, the statements under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere herein, are forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct and actual results may differ materially from those projected as a result of certain risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” and “Business Initiatives and Strategy” in the Partnership’s Annual Report on From 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “believe,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “expect,” “seek,” “estimate” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations (“Cautionary Statements”) are disclosed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Partnership or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the Cautionary Statements. Unless otherwise required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise after the date of this Report.

Overview

During March 2007, we completed our transition from a centralized customer service model to a more traditional customer service model in which the majority of our customer service calls are answered locally. We intend to utilize the centralized call center for certain off-peak and weekend hours.

The following is a discussion of the historical condition and results of operations of the Partnership and its subsidiaries, and should be read in conjunction with the description of our business in Item 1. “Business” (in the Partnership’s Annual Report on From 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006) and the historical Financial and Operating Data and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Report.

Restatement

On December 26, 2006, our management and the audit committee of our general partner determined that it was necessary to amend and restate the Partnership’s previously issued financial statements with respect to the accounting and disclosures for certain derivative transactions under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”) and for the amortization of an unrecognized gain in the calculation of pension expense. See Note 2 Restatement of Financial Information.

Derivatives

SFAS No. 133, established accounting and reporting standards requiring that our derivative instruments be recorded at fair value. As the Partnership does not designate its derivatives for hedge accounting treatment, we could experience significant volatility in earnings as these outstanding derivatives are market to market. The volatility in any given period related to unrealized gains or losses on derivative instruments can be material to the overall results of the Partnership.

Seasonality

In analyzing our financial results, the following matters should be considered. Our fiscal year ends on September 30. All references to quarters and years respectively in this document are to fiscal quarters and years unless otherwise noted. The seasonal nature of our business results in the sale of approximately 30% of our volume of home heating oil in the first fiscal quarter and 45% of our volume in the second fiscal

15

Table of Contents

quarter of each fiscal year, the peak heating season. Sales volume typically fluctuates from year to year in response to variations in weather, wholesale energy prices and other factors. Gross profit is affected not only by weather patterns but also by changes in customer mix. In addition, our gross profit margins vary by geographic region. Accordingly, gross profit margins could vary significantly from year to year in a period of identical sales volumes.

Weather Insurance Contract – Warm Weather

Weather conditions have a significant impact on the demand for home heating oil because our customers depend on this product principally for space heating purposes. Actual weather conditions can vary substantially from year to year, significantly affecting our financial performance. Furthermore, warmer than normal temperatures in one or more regions in which we operate can significantly decrease the total volume we sell and the gross profit realized on those sales and, consequently, our results of operations. We have purchased weather insurance to help mitigate the adverse effect of warm weather on our cash flows. The most recent current weather insurance contract covered the period from November 1, 2006 to February 28, 2007, taken as a whole. The strike or “pay-off” price is based on the 10 year moving average of degree days for the contract period and has been set at approximately 3% less than the 10 year moving average. For every degree day not realized below the strike-price we will receive $35,000, up to a maximum of $12.5 million. At December 31, 2006, we recorded a $7.2 million asset under this weather insurance contract in accordance with EITF 99-2. Temperatures in January and February 2007 were colder than the 10 year average and we lowered the expected proceeds under this contract by $2.9 million to $4.3 million at March 31, 2007. As of March 31, 2007, we recorded a receivable of $4.3 million for weather insurance, which was paid on April 12, 2007.

Customer Attrition

For the three months ended March 31, 2007, we lost 5,300 accounts (net) or 1.3% of our home heating oil customer base, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006 in which we lost 10,500 accounts (net) or 2.4% of our home heating oil customer base. This reduction in net losses of 5,200 accounts was due to an increase in gross customer gains of 2,600 accounts and a reduction in customer losses of 2,600.

For the six months ended March 31, 2007, we lost 9,400 accounts (net) or 2.3% of our home heating oil customer base, as compared to the six months ended March 31,2006 in which we lost 17,700 accounts (net) or 4.0% of our home heating oil customer base. This reduction in net losses of 8,300 accounts was due to a decrease in gross customer gains of 900 accounts and a reduction in gross customer losses of 9,200 accounts.

Results of Operations

The following is a discussion of the results of operations of the Partnership and its subsidiaries, and should be read in conjunction with the historical Financial and Operating Data and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.

16

Table of Contents

Three Months Ended March 31, 2007

Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2006

Volume

For the three months ended March 31, 2007, retail volume of home heating oil increased by 12.6 million gallons, or 6.9%, to 195.1 million gallons, as compared to 182.5 million gallons for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as the impact of colder weather and acquisitions was reduced by net customer attrition and other factors. Volume of other petroleum products increased by 1.4 million gallons, or 7.3%, to 20.9 million gallons for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to 19.5 million gallons for the three months ended March 31, 2006. An analysis of the change in the retail volume of home heating oil, which is based on management’s estimates, sampling and other mathematical calculations, is found below:

Temperatures in our geographic areas of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007 were 14.1% colder than the three months ended March 31, 2006 and were 0.9% warmer than normal, as reported by the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”). For the twelve months ended March 31, 2007, net customer attrition was 5.0%. Home heating oil volume increased by 0.5 million gallons due to two acquisitions completed in fiscal 2007. Excluding the impact of weather, we expect that home heating oil volume for the remainder of fiscal 2007 will be less than the comparable period in fiscal 2006 due to net customer attrition, conservation and other factors.

The percentage of home heating oil volume sold to residential variable price customers increased to 46.5% of total home heating oil volume sales for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to 45.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Accordingly, the percentage of home heating oil volume sold to residential price-protected customers decreased to 38.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to 39.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2006. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, sales to commercial/industrial customers represented 15.2% of total home heating oil volume sales, as compared to 15.4% for the three months ended March 31, 2006.

Product Sales

For the three months ended March 31, 2007, product sales increased $39.1 million, or 7.9%, to $534.9 million, as compared to $495.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 primarily due to the 6.9% increase in home heating oil volume sold and to a lesser extent, a 1.2% increase in selling prices. Average home heating oil selling prices increased by $0.0291 per gallon from $2.5076 per gallon for the three months ended March 31, 2006 to $2.5367 for the three months ended March 31, 2007.

Installation and Service Sales

For the three months ended March 31, 2007, service and installation sales decreased $1.3 million, or 2.9%, to $42.1 million, as compared to $43.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as a decline in installation sales of $2.4 million was reduced by a $1.1 million increase in service revenue. The decline in installation sales was affected by the warmer weather experienced in the fiscal first quarter and in January 2007, as well as increased customer credit standards.

Cost of Product

For the three months ended March 31, 2007, cost of product increased $17.3 million, or 4.7%, to $385.9 million, as compared to $368.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as the 6.9% increase in home heating oil volume

17

Table of Contents

was partially offset by a decrease in wholesale product cost. Average wholesale product cost for home heating oil decreased by $0.038 per gallon, or 2.1%, to an average of $1.7945 per gallon for the three months ended March 31, 2007, from an average of $1.8329 for the three months ended March 31, 2006.

We believe that the change in home heating oil margins should be evaluated before the effects of increases or decreases in the fair value of derivative instruments, as we believe that realized per gallon margins should not include the impact of non cash changes in the market value of hedges before the settlement of the underlying transaction. On that basis, home heating oil margins for the three months ended March 31, 2007 increased by $0.068 per gallon, to $0.7423 per gallon in the three months ended March 31, 2007 from $0.6748 per gallon in the three months ended March 31, 2006.

For the three months ended March 31, 2007, total product gross profit increased by $21.7 million, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006, due to the increase in realized home heating oil per gallon margins of $13.2 million and an increase of $8.5 million attributable to the increase in home heating oil volume.

Change in the Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the change in the fair value of derivative instruments resulted in the recording of an $18.5 million net credit due to the expiration of certain hedged positions ($13.8 million), and an increase in market value for unexpired hedges ($4.7 million). During the three months ended March 31, 2006, the change in fair value of derivative instruments also resulted in the recording of an $11.2 million net credit due to the expiration of certain hedged positions ($6.2 million) and an increase in market value for unexpired hedges ($5.0 million).

Cost of Installations and Service

For the three months ended March 31, 2007, cost of installations and service decreased $3.3 million, or 6.9%, to $44.4 million, as compared to $47.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, due to a decline in installation costs of $1.9 million and lower service expenses of $1.4 million. Installation costs were lower due to the previously noted decline in installation sales. Service expenses were lower despite colder weather due to our continued efforts to control our service department. The net loss realized from service (including installations) was reduced by $2.0 million, from $4.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 to $2.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007.

Delivery and Branch Expenses

For the three months ended March 31, 2007, delivery and branch expenses increased $11.1 million, or 19.1%, to $69.0 million, as compared to $57.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The accounting of our weather insurance contract drove $7.3 million of this change. Due to the warmer temperatures experienced in November and December 2006, we recorded $7.2 million due under our weather insurance contract, which covers the period from November 1, 2006 to February 28, 2007, taken as a whole. (See Weather Insurance Contract discussion.) Temperatures in January and February 2007 were colder than the base temperatures under the contract and we lowered the expected proceeds which increased delivery and branch expenses by $2.9 million during the three months ended March 31, 2007. During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we recorded $4.4 million due under our weather insurance contract due to the warm temperatures experienced during that period, which lowered delivery and branch expenses. As a result, delivery and branch expenses increased by $7.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2007. Excluding the impact of weather insurance, delivery and branch expenses increased $3.8 million, or 6.1%, slightly less than the 6.9% increase in home heating oil volume. On a cents per gallon basis (excluding the impact of weather insurance), these expenses declined slightly from 34.1 cents per gallon for the three months ended March 31, 2006 to 33.9 cents per gallon for the three months ended March 31, 2007.

Depreciation and Amortization

For the three months ended March 31, 2007, depreciation and amortization expenses declined by $0.6 million, or 7.7%, to $7.3 million, as compared to $7.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 as certain assets, which were not replaced, became fully depreciated.

General and Administrative Expenses

For the three months ended March 31, 2007, general and administrative expenses decreased by $0.1 million, or 1.3%, to $5.9 million, as compared to $6.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006.

18

Table of Contents

Operating Income

For the three months ended March 31, 2007, operating income increased $20.6 million to $82.9 million , as compared to $62.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as an increase in product gross profit of $21.7 million, a decline in net service and installation expense of $2.0 million, a favorable change in the impact of derivative instruments of $7.2 million and lower depreciation and amortization of $0.6 million was reduced by a volume driven $3.7 million increase in operating costs and the comparable period decrease in the weather insurance contract of $7.3 million.

Interest expense

For the three months ended March 31, 2007, interest expense decreased $2.8 million, or 35.5%, to $5.1 million, as compared to $8.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This decrease resulted from a lower average principal amount in total debt outstanding of approximately $124.3 million. Total debt outstanding declined by $92.5 million due to the recapitalization (see Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements) and lower working capital borrowings of $31.5 million.

Interest Income

For the three months ended March 31, 2007, interest income increased by $0.7 million, or 86.2%, to $1.6 million, as compared to $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 due to higher invested cash balances.

Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs

For the three months ended March 31, 2007, amortization of debt issuance costs was $0.6 million, unchanged from the three months ended March 31, 2006.

Income Tax Expense

For the three months ended March 31, 2007, income tax expense was $3.8 million, an increase of $3.4 million as compared to $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, and represents certain state income tax, alternative minimum federal tax and capital taxes. Income taxes are recorded based on an annual effective rate (including any benefit of Net Operating Loss carry forwards), which is then applied to book income (or loss) before taxes, resulting in a quarterly tax charge (or benefit). The $3.4 million increase is due to the increase in 2007’s estimated taxable income by jurisdiction versus 2006.

Net Income

For the three months ended March 31, 2007, net income of $74.9 million was recorded as compared to net income of $54.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This increase in net income of $20.8 million was due to a $20.6 million increase in operating income and lower net interest expense of $3.6 million partially offset by an increase in income tax expense of $3.4 million.

Earnings From Continuing Operations Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)

For the three months ended March 31, 2007, EBITDA increased $20.0 million, to $90.2 million, as compared to $70.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 as the impact of the additional volume sold and higher margins resulted in an increase in EBITDA of $20.1 million and a $7.2 million increase relating to the change in fair value of derivative instruments was reduced by $7.3 million due to the difference in weather insurance. For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, EBITDA increased by the non-cash change in the fair value of derivative instruments of $18.5 million and $11.2 million, respectively.

19

Table of Contents

EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income (as an indicator of operating performance) or as an alternative to cash flow (as a measure of liquidity or ability to service debt obligations), but provides additional information for evaluating our ability to make the Minimum Quarterly Distribution. EBITDA is calculated as follows:

20

Table of Contents

Six Months Ended March 31, 2007

Compared to the Six Months Ended March 31, 2006

Volume

For the six months ended March 31, 2007, retail volume of home heating oil decreased by 19.4 million gallons, or 6.2%, to 294.3 million gallons, as compared to 313.7 million gallons for the six months ended March 31, 2006 largely due to net customer attrition. Volume of other petroleum products declined by 0.5 million gallons, or 1.3%, to 36.7 million gallons for the six months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to 37.1 million gallons for the six months ended March 31, 2006. An analysis of the change in the retail volume of home heating oil, which is based on management’s estimates, sampling and other mathematical calculations, is found below:

Temperatures in our geographic areas of operations for the six months ended March 31, 2007 were 0.6% colder than the six months ended March 31, 2006 and 8.3% warmer than normal, as reported by the NOAA. For the twelve months ended March 31, 2007, net customer attrition was 5.0%.

The percentage of home heating oil volume sold to residential variable price customers increased to 46.7% of total home heating oil volume sales for the six months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to 45.5% for the six months ended March 31, 2006. Accordingly, the percentage of home heating oil volume sold to residential price-protected customers decreased to 37.6% for the six months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to 38.7% for the six months ended March 31, 2006. For the six months ended March 31, 2007, sales to commercial/industrial customers represented 15.7% of total home heating oil volume sales, unchanged from the six months ended March 31, 2006.

Product Sales

For the six months ended March 31, 2007, product sales decreased $39.4 million, or 4.6%, to $815.3 million, as compared to $854.7 million for the six months ended March 31, 2006 as a 1.6% increase in home heating oil selling prices was reduced by the 6.2% decrease in home heating oil volume. Average home heating oil selling prices increased by $0.0389 per gallon from $2.4894 per gallon for the six months ended March 31, 2006 to $2.5283 for the six months ended March 31, 2007.

Installation and Service Sales

For the six months ended March 31, 2007, service and installation sales decreased $6.9 million, or 7.0%, to $91.9 million, as compared to $98.8 million for the six months ended March 31, 2006 as a decline in installation sales of $7.4 million was reduced by an increase in service revenue of $0.5 million. The decline in installation sales was affected by the warmer weather experienced during the first fiscal quarter of 2007, increased customer credit standards, and net customer attrition.

Cost of Product

For the six months ended March 31, 2007, cost of product decreased $38.7 million, or 6.1%, to $592.2 million, as compared to $630.9 million for the six months ended March 31, 2006 due to the 6.2% decrease in home heating oil volume and slightly lower wholesale product cost for home heating oil. Average wholesale product cost for home heating oil decreased by $0.0062 per gallon, or 0.3%, to an average of $1.7946 per gallon for the six months ended March 31, 2007, from an average of $1.8008 for the six months ended March 31, 2006.

21

Table of Contents

Home heating oil margins for the six months ended March 31, 2007 increased by $0.0451 per gallon to $0.7338 per gallon in the six months ended March 31, 2007 from $0.6887 per gallon in the six months ended March 31, 2006.

For the six months ended March 31, 2007, total product gross profit decreased by $0.7 million, as compared to the six months ended March 31, 2006, as the increase due to higher home heating oil per gallon margins of $13.3 million was reduced by the impact of lower home heating oil volume of $13.4 million and a reduction in gross profit from petroleum products of $0.6 million.

Change in the Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

During the six months ended March 31, 2007, the change in fair value of derivative instruments resulted in the recording of a $12.1 million net credit due to the expiration of certain hedged positions ($11.3 million), and an increase in market value for unexpired hedges ($0.8 million). During the six months ended March 31, 2006, the change in fair value of derivative transactions resulted in the recording of a $29.3 million charge due to the expiration of certain hedged positions ($27.9 million), and a decrease in market value for unexpired hedges ($1.4 million).

Cost of Installations and Service

For the six months ended March 31, 2007, cost of installations and service decreased $10.5 million, or 10.0%, to $94.9 million, as compared to $105.4 million for the six months ended March 31, 2006 due to a decline in installation costs of $5.7 million and lower service expenses of $4.8 million. Installation costs were lower due to the previously noted decline in installation sales. Service expenses were lower due to our continued efforts to control our service department. The net loss realized from service (including installations) was reduced by $3.6 million, from a $6.5 million loss for the six months ended March 31, 2006 to a $3.0 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007.

Delivery and Branch Expenses

For the six months ended March 31, 2007, delivery and branch expenses decreased $1.1 million, or 0.9%, to $115.8 million, as compared to $116.9 million for the six months ended March 31, 2006. During the six months ended March 31, 2007, we recorded $4.3 million under our weather insurance contract, which lowered delivery and branch expenses. In the six months ended March 31, 2006, delivery and branch expenses were reduced by $4.4 million recorded under our weather insurance contract. On a cents per gallon basis (excluding the impact of weather insurance), these expenses increased 2.1 cents per gallon, or 5.6%, from 38.7 cents per gallon for the six months ended March 31, 2006 to 40.8 cents per gallon for the six months ended March 31, 2007, due to the fixed nature of certain delivery and branch expenses.

Depreciation and Amortization

For the six months ended March 31, 2007, depreciation and amortization expenses declined by $1.7 million, or 10.5%, to $14.7 million, as compared to $16.4 million for the six months ended March 31, 2006 as certain assets, which were not replaced, became fully depreciated.

General and Administrative Expenses

For the six months ended March 31, 2007, general and administrative expenses decreased by $2.5 million, or 19.7%, to $10.3 million, as compared to $12.8 million for the six months ended March 31, 2006 largely due to a reduction in legal and professional expenses.

Operating Income

For the six months ended March 31, 2007, operating income increased $49.7 million to a $91.5 million, as compared to $41.8 million for the six months ended March 31, 2006. The majority of this increase relates to the changes in the fair value of derivative instruments of $41.5 million. The balance of the change, or $8.2 million, was due to lower operating costs including net service and installation totaling $7.2 million, and lower depreciation and amortization expense of $1.7 million, partially offset by a decrease in product gross profit of $0.7 million.

22

Table of Contents

Interest expense

For the six months ended March 31, 2007, interest expense decreased $5.3 million, or 33.9%, to $10.2 million, as compared to $15.5 million for the six months ended March 31, 2006. This decrease resulted from a lower average principal amount in total debt outstanding of approximately $112.4 million. Total debt outstanding declined due to the recapitalization ($92.5 million) (see Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements) and lower working capital borrowings ($19.4 million).

Interest Income

For the six months ended March 31, 2007, interest income increased by $1.7 million to $3.4 million, as compared to $1.7 million for the six months ended March 31, 2006 due to higher invested cash balances.

Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs

For the six months ended March 31, 2007, amortization of debt issuance costs was $1.1 million slightly lower than the $1.3 million for the six months ended March 31, 2006.

Income Tax Expense

For the six months ended March 31, 2007, income tax expense was $3.9 million and represents certain state income tax, alternative minimum federal tax and capital taxes. Income taxes are recorded based on an annual effective rate (including any benefit of Net Operating Loss carry forwards), which is then applied to book income (loss) before taxes, resulting in a tax charge (or benefit). Income tax expense for the six months ended March 31, 2006 was $0.7 million.

Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle

Effective October 1, 2005, we changed our method of accounting from the first-in, first-out method to the weighted average cost method for heating oil and other fuel inventory. This change resulted in the recording of a charge of $0.3 million during the six months ended March 31, 2006.

Net Income

For the six months ended March 31, 2007, net income of $79.6 million was recorded as compared to a net income of $25.7 million for the six months ended March 31, 2006. This change of $53.9 million was due to a $49.7 million increase in operating income and lower net interest expense of $6.9 million, reduced by higher income tax expense of $3.2 million.

Earnings From Continuing Operations Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)

For the six months ended March 31, 2007, EBITDA increased $48.0 million, to $106.2 million, as compared to $58.2 million for the six months ended March 31, 2006, of which $41.5 million relates to the change in fair value of derivative instruments and $6.5 is largely due to lower operating expenses. For the six months ended March 31, 2007, EBITDA was increased by the non-cash change in the fair value of derivative instruments of $12.1 million. For the six months ended March 31, 2006, EBITDA was negatively impacted by $29.3 million due to the non-cash change in the fair value of derivative instruments.

23

Table of Contents

EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income (as an indicator of operating performance) or as an alternative to cash flow (as a measure of liquidity or ability to service debt obligations), but provides additional information for evaluating our ability to make the Minimum Quarterly Distribution. EBITDA is calculated as follows: