STARRETT L S CO - Annual Report: 2008 (Form 10-K)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
____________
FORM
10-K
____________
(check
one)
x
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the fiscal year ended June 28, 2008
OR
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the transition period from
to
Commission
File No. 1-367
____________
THE
L.S. STARRETT COMPANY
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
____________
MASSACHUSETTS
|
04-1866480
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
121
CRESCENT STREET, ATHOL, MASSACHUSETTS
|
01331
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code 978-249-3551
____________
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title
of each class
|
Name
of each exchange on which registered
|
|
Class A
Common - $1.00 Per Share Par Value
|
New
York Stock Exchange
|
|
Class
B Common - $1.00 Per Share Par Value
|
Not
applicable
|
____________
1
Indicate
by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate
by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No
x
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required
to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of
Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or amendment to this
Form 10-K. x
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)
Large
Accelerated Filer ¨ Accelerated
Filer x
Non-Accelerated
Filer ¨ Smaller
Reporting Company ¨
(Do not
check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x
The
Registrant had 5,663,560 and 924,317 shares, respectively, of its $1.00 par
value Class A and B common stock outstanding on December 29, 2007. On December
28, 2007, the last business day of the Registrant’s second fiscal quarter, the
aggregate market value of the common stock held by nonaffiliates was
approximately $114,629,000.
There
were 5,723,475 and 894,627 shares, respectively, of the Registrant’s $1.00 par
value Class A and Class B common stock outstanding as of August 31,
2008.
The
exhibit index is located on pages 49-51.
Documents
incorporated by reference.
|
Portions
of the Proxy Statement for October 8, 2008 Annual Meeting (Part
III).
|
2
PART I
Item 1 -
Business
General
The
Company was founded in 1880 by Laroy S. Starrett and incorporated in 1929, and
is engaged in the business of manufacturing over 5,000 different products for
industrial, professional and consumer markets. As a global manufacturer with
major subsidiaries in Brazil (1956), Scotland (1958) and China (1997), the
Company offers its broad array of products to the market through multiple
channels of distribution throughout the world. Products include precision tools,
electronic gages, gage blocks, optical and vision measuring equipment, custom
engineered granite solutions, tape measures, levels, chalk products, squares,
band saw blades, hole saws, hacksaw blades, jig saw blades, reciprocating saw
blades, M1®
lubricant and precision ground flat stock.
Starrett®
is brand recognized around the world for precision, quality and
innovation.
Products
The
Company’s tools and instruments are sold throughout North America and over 100
foreign countries. By far the largest consumer of these products is the
metalworking industry including aerospace, medical, and automotive but other
important consumers are marine and farm equipment shops, do-it-yourselfers and
tradesmen such as builders, carpenters, plumbers and electricians.
For over
125 years the Company has been a recognized leader in hand measuring tools and
precision instruments such as micrometers, vernier calipers, height gages,
depth gages, electronic gages, dial indicators, steel rules, combination squares
and many other items. During fiscal 2008, the Company enhanced its wireless data
collection solutions, making it more customer-friendly and more
software-compatible.
The
Company’s saw product lines enjoy strong global brand recognition and market
share. These products encompass a breadth of uses. Band saw blades target
engineered production and shop applications with products ranging from the
Company’s bi-metal unique® Gladiator product to wide band and carbide tipped
products. A full line of complimentary saw products include hack, jig,
reciprocating saw blades and hole saws provide cutting solutions for the
building trades and are offered primarily through construction, electrical,
plumbing and retail distributors. During fiscal 2008 the Company was issued a
patent for its bi-metal unique® manufacturing process and products. This
break-through Split Chip Advantage technology enables the Company to produce saw
blades, which are up to 50% stronger and offer up to 170% more contact area than
traditional electron beam (EB) products. This technology is now used on many of
the Company’s saw products.
Recent
acquisitions have added to the Company’s portfolio of custom measuring solutions
that complement the Company’s existing special gaging expertise. On July 17,
2007, the Company purchased all of the assets of Kinemetric Engineering.
Kinemetric Engineering specializes in precision video-based metrology, specialty
motion devices and custom engineered systems for measurement and inspection.
Kinemetric Engineering brings a wealth of experience, engineering and
manufacturing capability. This business unit also oversees the sales and support
of the Company’s high quality line of Starrett Optical Projectors, combining to
make a very comprehensive product offering.
The
Company’s custom engineered granite product offering was further enhanced by the
acquisition of Tru-Stone Technologies Inc. (Tru-Stone) in fiscal 2006. This
strategic acquisition significantly improved the granite surface plate
capabilities providing access to high-end metrology markets such as the
electronics and flat panel display industry. The consolidation of the Company’s
granite surface plate operations with Tru-Stone provided savings in labor and
operating expenses.
Personnel
At June
28, 2008, the Company had 2,221 employees, approximately 53% of whom were
domestic. This represents a net increase from June 30, 2007 of 108 employees.
The increased employment is primarily due to work force increases in Athol, Mt.
Airy, China and the Dominican Republic. These increases were
3
partially
offset by reductions at Tru-Stone and the North Charleston, SC facility of the
Company’s Evans Rule Division.
None of
the Company’s operations are subject to collective bargaining agreements. In
general, the Company considers relations with its employees to be excellent.
Domestic employees hold a large share of Company stock resulting from various
stock purchase plans. The Company believes that this dual role of owner-employee
has been excellent for morale over the years.
Competition
The
Company is competing on the basis of its reputation as the best in class for
quality, precision and innovation combined with its commitment to customer
service and strong customer relationships. Although the Company is generally
operating in highly competitive markets, competitive position cannot be
determined accurately in the aggregate or by specific segment since none of its
competitors offer all of the same product lines or serve all of the same markets
as it does.
The
Company is one of the largest producers of mechanics’ hand measuring tools and
precision instruments. In the United States, there are three other major
companies and numerous small competitors in the field, including direct foreign
competitors. As a result, the industry is highly competitive. During fiscal
2008, there were no material changes in the Company’s competitive position. In
spite of the continued migration of American manufacturing jobs to lower cost
countries and a softening U.S. economy, the Company was able to generate above
average growth in North America. Internationally, the Company’s significant
investments in manufacturing and sales operations in China have resulted in
major sales growth and enhanced brand recognition. During fiscal 2008, export
sales from the U.S. have strengthened due to the weak U.S. dollar, resulting in
more competitive prices abroad.
The
Company’s products for the building trades, such as tape measures and levels,
are under constant margin pressure due to a channel shift to large national home
and hardware retailers. The Company is responding to such challenges by
expanding its manufacturing operations in China and in the Dominican Republic.
Certain large customers offer private labels (“own brand”) that compete with
Starrett branded products. These products are often sourced directly from low
cost countries.
Saw
products encounter competition from several domestic and international sources.
The Company’s competitive position varies by market segment and country.
Continued research and development, new patented products and processes, and
strong customer support have enabled the Company to compete successfully in both
general and performance oriented applications.
Foreign
Operations
The
operations of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are consolidated in its
financial statements. The subsidiaries located in Brazil, Scotland and China are
actively engaged in the manufacture and distribution of hacksaw blades, band saw
blades, hole saws and a limited line of precision tools and measuring tapes.
Subsidiaries in Canada, Argentina, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico and Germany
are engaged in distribution of the Company’s products. During fiscal 2005, the
Company completed the establishment of manufacturing operations in the Dominican
Republic, primarily for its Evans Rule Division. The Company expects its foreign
subsidiaries to continue to play a significant role in its overall operations. A
summary of the Company’s foreign operations is contained in Note 13 to the
Company’s fiscal 2008 financial statements under the caption “OPERATING DATA”
found in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Orders
and Backlog
The
Company generally fills orders from finished goods inventories on hand. Sales
order backlog of the Company at any point in time is not significant. Total
inventories amounted to $61.1 million at June 28, 2008 and $57.3 million at June
30, 2007. The Company uses the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method of valuing most
domestic inventories (approximately 51% of all inventories). LIFO inventory
amounts reported in the financial statements are approximately $27.5 million and
$28.4 million, respectively, lower than if determined on a first-in, first-out
(FIFO) basis at June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007.
4
Intellectual
Property
When
appropriate, the Company applies for patent protection on new inventions and
currently owns a number of patents. Its patents are considered important in the
operation of the business, but no single patent is of material importance when
viewed from the standpoint of its overall business. As noted previously, during
fiscal 2008 the Company was issued a patent for its bi-metal unique®
manufacturing process and products. The Company relies on its
continuing product research and development efforts, with less dependence on its
current patent position. It has for many years maintained engineers and
supporting personnel engaged in research, product development and related
activities. The expenditures for these activities during fiscal years 2008, 2007
and 2006 were approximately $2.4 million, $2.7 million and $2.9 million
respectively, all of which were expensed in the Company’s financial
statements.
The
Company uses trademarks with respect to its products and considers its
intellectual property (IP) as one of its most valuable assets. All of the
Company’s important trademarks are registered and rigorously
enforced.
Environmental
Compliance
with federal, state, local, and foreign provisions that have been enacted or
adopted regulating the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise
relating to protection of the environment is not expected to have a material
effect on the capital expenditures, earnings and competitive position of the
Company. Specifically, the Company has taken steps to reduce, control and treat
water discharges and air emissions.
Strategic
Activities
Globalization
has had a profound impact on product offerings and buying behaviors of industry
and consumers in North America and around the world, forcing the Company to
adapt to this new, highly competitive business environment. The Company
continuously evaluates most all aspects of its business, aiming for new
world-class ideas to set itself apart from its competition.
The
strategic focus has shifted from manufacturing locations to global brand
building through product portfolio and distribution channels management while
reducing costs through lean manufacturing, plant consolidations, global sourcing
and improved logistics.
The
execution of these strategic initiatives has expanded the Company’s
manufacturing and distribution in developing economies which has increased its
international sales revenues to 50% of its consolidated sales.
On
September 21, 2006, the Company sold its Alum Bank, PA level manufacturing plant
and relocated the manufacturing to the Dominican Republic, where production
began in fiscal 2005. The tape measure production of the Evans Rule Division
facilities in Puerto Rico and Charleston, SC has been transferred to the
Dominican Republic. The Company vacated and plans to sell its Evans Rule
facility in North Charleston, SC. The Company’s goal is to achieve labor savings
and maintain margins while satisfying the demands of its customers for lower
prices. The Company has closed three warehouses, the most recent being the
Glendale, AZ facility, which was sold in fiscal 2008. Also during fiscal 2006,
the Company began a lean manufacturing initiative in its Athol, MA facility,
which has reduced costs over time. This initiative has continued through fiscal
2007 and 2008 and will continue into fiscal 2009.
The
Tru-Stone acquisition in April 2006 represented a strategic acquisition for the
Company in that it provides an enhancement of the Company’s granite surface
plate capabilities. Profit margins for the Company’s standard plate business
have improved as the Company’s existing granite surface plate facility was
consolidated into Tru-Stone, where average gross margins have been higher. Along
the same lines, the Kinemetric Engineering acquisition in July 2007 represented
another strategic acquisition in the field of precision video-based metrology
which, when combined with the Company’s existing optical projection line, will
provide a very comprehensive product offering.
SEC
Filings and Certifications
The
Company makes its public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”), including its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form
10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all
5
exhibits
and amendments to these reports, available free of charge at its website,
www.starrett.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company files such
material with the SEC. Information contained on the Company’s website is not
part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 1A – Risk
Factors
SAFE
HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF
1995
This
Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Company’s 2008 Annual Report to Stockholders,
including the President’s letter, contains forward-looking statements about the
Company’s business, competition, sales, gross margins, expenditures, foreign
operations, plans for reorganization, interest rate sensitivity, debt service,
liquidity and capital resources, and other operating and capital requirements.
In addition, forward-looking statements may be included in future Company
documents and in oral statements by Company representatives to security analysts
and investors. The Company is subject to risks that could cause actual events to
vary materially from such forward-looking statements, including the following
risk factors:
Risks Related to
Reorganization: Part of the Company’s continuous improvement process is
to evaluate the merits of consolidation and reorganization of its manufacturing
and distribution operations. There can be no assurance that the Company will be
successful in these efforts or that any consolidation or reorganization will
result in revenue increases or cost savings to the Company. The implementation
of these reorganization measures may disrupt the Company’s manufacturing and
distribution activities, could adversely affect operations, and could result in
asset impairment charges and other costs that will be recognized if and when
reorganization or restructuring plans are implemented or obligations are
incurred. This has occurred with the Company’s move to the Dominican Republic
from South Carolina. Indeed, the relocation, restructuring and closure of the
Company’s Evans Rule Division’s Charleston, SC facility and start up of that
division’s Dominican Republic operations was a factor contributing to the
Company’s fiscal 2006 loss. If the Company is unable to maintain consistent
profitability, additional steps will have to be taken, including further plant
consolidations and workforce reductions.
Risks Related to Technology:
Although the Company’s strategy includes investment in research and development
of new and innovative products to meet technology advances, there can be no
assurance that the Company will be successful in competing against new
technologies developed by competitors.
Risks Related to Foreign
Operations: Approximately 50% of the Company’s sales and 40% of net
assets relate to foreign operations. Foreign operations are subject to special
risks that can materially affect the sales, profits, cash flows and financial
position of the Company, including taxes and other restrictions on distributions
and payments, currency exchange rate fluctuations, political and economic
instability, inflation, minimum capital requirements and exchange controls. In
particular, the Company’s Brazilian operations, which constitute over half of
the Company’s revenues from foreign operations, can be very volatile, changing
from year to year due to the political situation, currency risk and the economy.
As a result, the future performance of the Brazilian operations may be difficult
to forecast.
Risks Related to Industrial
Manufacturing Sector: The market for most of the Company’s products is
subject to economic conditions affecting the industrial manufacturing sector,
including the level of capital spending by industrial companies and the general
movement of manufacturing to low cost foreign countries where the Company does
not have a substantial market presence. Accordingly, economic weakness in the
industrial manufacturing sector may, and in some cases has, resulted in
decreased demand for certain of the Company’s products, which adversely affects
sales and performance. Economic weakness in the consumer market will also
adversely impact the Company’s performance. In the event that demand for any of
the Company’s products declines significantly, the Company could be required to
recognize certain costs as well as asset impairment charges on long-lived assets
related to those products.
Risks Related to Competition:
The Company’s business is subject to direct and indirect competition from both
domestic and foreign firms. In particular, low cost foreign sources have created
severe competitive pricing pressures. Under certain circumstances, including
significant changes in U.S. and foreign currency
6
relationships,
such pricing pressures tend to reduce unit sales and/or adversely affect the
Company’s margins.
Risks Related to Customer
Concentration: Sears sales and unit volume decreased significantly during
fiscal 2007 and 2008. This situation is problematic and if the Sears brands
(i.e., Craftsman) the Company supports continue to have declining sales, this
would have a negative effect on the Company’s financial performance. The further
loss or reduction in orders by Sears or any of the Company’s remaining large
customers, including reductions due to market, economic or competitive
conditions could adversely affect business and results of operations. Moreover,
the Company’s major customers have, and may continue to, place pressure on the
Company to reduce its prices. This pricing pressure may affect the Company’s
margins and revenues and could adversely affect business and results of
operations.
Risks Related to Insurance
Coverage: The Company carries liability, property damage, workers’
compensation, medical and other insurance coverage’s that management considers
adequate for the protection of its assets and operations. There can be no
assurance, however, that the coverage limits of such policies will be adequate
to cover all claims and losses. Such uncovered claims and losses could have a
material adverse effect on the Company. Depending on the risk, deductibles can
be as high as 5% of the loss or $500,000.
Risks Related to Raw Material and
Energy Costs: Steel is the principal raw material used in the manufacture
of the Company’s products. The price of steel has historically fluctuated on a
cyclical basis and has often depended on a variety of factors over which the
Company has no control. During fiscal 2008, the cost of steel rose approximately
7%. Because of competitive pressures, the Company generally has not been able to
pass on these increases to the customer resulting in reduction to gross margins.
The cost of producing the Company’s products is also sensitive to the price of
energy. The selling prices of the Company’s products have not always increased
in response to raw material, energy or other cost increases, and the Company is
unable to determine to what extent, if any, it will be able to pass future cost
increases through to its customers. The Company’s inability to pass increased
costs through to its customers could materially and adversely affect its
financial condition or results of operations.
Risks Related to Stock Market
Performance: Although the Company’s domestic defined benefit pension plan
is significantly overfunded, a significant (over 30%) drop in the stock market,
even if short in duration, could cause the plan to become temporarily
underfunded and require the temporary reclassification of prepaid pension cost
on the balance sheet from an asset to a contra equity account, thus reducing
stockholders’ equity and book value per share. There would also be a similar
risk for the Company’s UK plan, which was underfunded during fiscal 2006, 2007
and 2008.
Risks Related to Acquisitions:
Acquisitions, such as the Company’s acquisition of Tru-Stone in fiscal
2006 and Kinemetric Engineering in fiscal 2008, involve special risks,
including, the potential assumption of unanticipated liabilities and
contingencies, difficulty in assimilating the operations and personnel of the
acquired businesses, disruption of the Company’s existing business, dissipation
of the Company’s limited management resources, and impairment of relationships
with employees and customers of the acquired business as a result of changes in
ownership and management. While the Company believes that strategic acquisitions
can improve its competitiveness and profitability, these activities could have
an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and operating
results.
Risks Related to Investor
Expectations. The Company's operating results have fluctuated
from quarter to quarter in the past, and the Company expects that they will
continue to do so in the future. The Company's earnings may not
continue to grow at rates similar to the growth rates achieved in recent years
and may fall short of either a prior quarter or investors’ expectations. If the
Company fails to meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors, the
Company's share price may decline.
Risks Related to Information Systems.
The
efficient operation of the Company's business is dependent on its information
systems, including its ability to operate them effectively and to successfully
implement new technologies, systems, controls and adequate disaster recovery
systems. In addition, the Company must protect the confidentiality of
data of its business, employees, customers and other third parties. The
7
failure
of the Company's information systems to perform as designed or its failure to
implement and operate them effectively could disrupt the Company's business or
subject it to liability and thereby harm its profitability.
Risks Related to Litigation and
Changes in Laws, Regulations and Accounting Rules. Various
aspects of the Company's operations are subject to federal, state, local or
foreign laws, rules and regulations, any of which may change from time to time.
Generally accepted accounting principles may change from time to time, as well.
In addition, the Company is regularly involved in various litigation matters
that arise in the ordinary course of business. Litigation, regulatory
developments and changes in accounting rules and principles could adversely
affect the Company's business operations and financial performance.
Item 1B – Unresolved Staff
Comments
|
None.
|
Item 2 -
Properties
The
Company’s principal plant is located in Athol, MA on about 15 acres of
Company-owned land. The plant consists of 25 buildings, mostly of brick
construction of varying dates, with approximately 535,000 square feet of
production and storage area.
The
Webber Gage Division, Cleveland, OH, owns and occupies two buildings totaling
approximately 50,000 square feet.
The
Company-owned facility in Mt. Airy, NC consists of two buildings totaling
approximately 356,000 square feet. It is occupied by the Company’s Saw Division,
Ground Flat Stock Division and a distribution center.
The
Company’s Evans Rule Division owns a 173,000 square foot building in North
Charleston, SC. In fiscal 2006, manufacturing operations were moved to a new
50,000 square foot facility in the Dominican Republic from both the North
Charleston site and Mayaquez, Puerto Rico operations. The Company now occupies a
3,400 square foot leased office in North Charleston for administrative personnel
and has the North Charleston property listed for sale.
The
Company’s Exact Level Division was relocated to the Evans facility in the
Dominican Republic. Its 50,000 square foot building located in Alum Bank, PA was
sold on September 21, 2006.
The
Company’s subsidiary in Itu, Brazil owns and occupies several buildings totaling
209,000 square feet. The Company’s subsidiary in Jedburgh, Scotland owns and
occupies a 175,000 square foot building. Two wholly owned subsidiaries in Suzhou
and Shanghai (People’s Republic of China), lease approximately 41,000 square
feet and 5,000 square feet, respectively.
In
addition, the Company operates warehouses and/or sales-support offices in the
U.S., Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, Germany, Japan, and
Argentina.
A
warehouse in Glendale, AZ encompassing 35,000 square feet was closed in fiscal
2006 and the building was sold during fiscal 2008.
With the
acquisition of Tru-Stone in fiscal 2006, the Company added a 90,000 square foot
facility in Waite Park, MN.
With the
acquisition of Kinemetric Engineering in fiscal 2008, the Company added a 9,000
square foot leased facility in Laguna Hills, CA, which was recently expanded to
14,000 square feet.
In the
Company’s opinion, all of its property, plant and equipment is in good operating
condition, well maintained and adequate for its needs.
8
Item 3 - Legal
Proceedings
The
Company is, in the ordinary course of business, from time to time involved in
litigation that is not considered material to its financial condition or
operations.
Item 4 - Submission of
Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No
matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter
of fiscal 2008.
PART II
Item 5 - Market for the
Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
The
Company’s Class A common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange.
Quarterly dividend and high/low closing market price information is presented in
the table below. The Company’s Class B common stock is generally
nontransferable, except to lineal descendants, and thus has no established
trading market, but it can be converted into Class A common stock at any time.
The Class B common stock was issued on October 5, 1988, and the Company has paid
the same dividends thereon as have been paid on the Class A common stock since
that date. On June 28, 2008, there were approximately 5,100 registered holders
of Class A common stock and approximately 1,900 registered holders of Class B
common stock.
Quarter
Ended
|
Dividends
|
High
|
Low
|
|||||||||
September
2006
|
$ | 0.10 | $ | 15.30 | $ | 12.69 | ||||||
December
2006
|
0.10 | 17.12 | 13.51 | |||||||||
March
2007
|
0.10 | 20.00 | 15.15 | |||||||||
June
2007
|
0.10 | 19.47 | 14.53 | |||||||||
September
2007
|
0.10 | 19.48 | 15.27 | |||||||||
December
2007
|
0.20 | 20.27 | 17.00 | |||||||||
March
2008
|
0.10 | 19.99 | 13.69 | |||||||||
June
2008
|
0.12 | 23.83 | 18.15 |
While the
Company’s dividend policy is subject to periodic review by the Board of
Directors, the Company currently intends to continue to pay comparable dividends
in the future.
ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Summary
of Stock Repurchases:
|
A summary
of the Company’s repurchases of shares of its common stock for the fourth
quarter fiscal 2008 is as follows:
Period
|
Shares
Purchased
|
Average
Price
|
Shares
Purchased Under Announced Programs
|
Shares
yet to be Purchased Under Announced Programs
|
|||||||||
April
2008
|
None
|
– | – | – | |||||||||
May
2008
|
None
|
– | – | – | |||||||||
June
2008
|
None
|
– | – | – |
Average
price paid per share includes commissions and is rounded to the nearest two
decimal places.
PERFORMANCE
GRAPH
The
following graph sets forth information comparing the cumulative total return to
holders of the Company’s Class A common stock over the last five fiscal years
with (1) the cumulative total return of the Russell 2000 Index (“Russell 2000”)
and (2) a peer group index (the “Peer Group”) reflecting the cumulative total
returns of certain small cap manufacturing companies as described below. For
fiscal 2008, the Company has concluded that changes to the peer group were
necessary to have the group more reflective of the Company’s manufacturing
profile. The Company’s old Peer Group consists of: Badger
9
Meter,
Inc., Baldor Electric Co., Chicago Rivet & Machine Co., Cuno Inc., The
Eastern Company, Esco Technologies Inc., Federal Screw Works, National Presto
Industries, Inc., Park-Ohio Holdings Corp., Penn Engineering & Manufacturing
Corp. (through 2004), Regal-Beloit Corp., Tecumseh Products Co., Tennant Co. and
WD-40 Co. The new group has added the following companies: Acme United, Q.E.P.
Co. Inc., and Thermadyne Holdings Corp. and has deleted Baldor Electronic Co.,
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co., Esco Technologies Inc, and Park-Ohio Holdings
Corp.
BASE
|
FY2004
|
FY2005
|
FY2006
|
FY2007
|
FY2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||
STARRETT
|
100.00 | 127.90 | 147.75 | 113.40 | 156.01 | 207.35 | ||||||||||||||||||
RUSSELL
2000
|
100.00 | 133.37 | 145.96 | 167.24 | 194.73 | 163.19 | ||||||||||||||||||
NEW
PEER GROUP
|
100.00 | 119.85 | 131.95 | 168.34 | 194.39 | 194.85 | ||||||||||||||||||
OLD
PEER GROUP
|
100.00 | 120.76 | 150.50 | 186.14 | 211.14 | 198.21 |
Item 6 - Selected Financial
Data
Years
ended in June ($000 except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
(Restated)
(1)
|
2004
(Restated)
(1)
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 242,371 | $ | 222,356 | $ | 200,916 | $ | 195,909 | $ | 179,996 | ||||||||||
Net
earnings (loss)
|
10,831 | 6,653 | (3,782 | ) | 3,979 | (2,700 | ) | |||||||||||||
Basic
earnings (loss) per share
|
1.64 | 1.00 | (0.57 | ) | 0.60 | (0.41 | ) | |||||||||||||
Diluted
earnings (loss) per share
|
1.64 | 1.00 | (0.57 | ) | 0.60 | (0.41 | ) | |||||||||||||
Long-term
debt (2)
|
5,834 | 8,520 | 13,054 | 2,885 | 2,536 | |||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
250,285 | 234,011 | 228,082 | 224,114 | 218,924 | |||||||||||||||
Dividends
per share
|
0.52 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 |
10
(1)
|
Certain
tax amounts have been restated as referenced in Note 1 of the Company’s
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this
Form 10-K. The effect was to increase deferred tax expense and decrease
net earnings by $50,000 in fiscal year 2005 and increase deferred tax
expense and the net loss by $348,000 in fiscal year
2004.
|
(2)
|
Note
that the significant increase in long-term debt in fiscal 2006 is related
to the Tru-Stone acquisition. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
|
Items 7
and 7A- Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market
Risk
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Fiscal
2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007
Overview For
fiscal 2008, the Company realized net income of $10.8 million, or $1.64 per
basic and diluted share compared to a net income of $6.7 million or $1.00 per
basic and diluted share for fiscal 2007. This represents an increase in net
income of $4.1 million comprised of an increase in gross margin of $10.4
million, an increase of $7.1 million in selling, general and administrative
costs, an increase in other income (expense) of $4.7 million and an increase in
income tax expense of $3.9 million from $2.2 million to $6.1 million. The above
items are discussed in more detail below.
Net
Sales Net sales for fiscal 2008 were up $20.0 million or 9%
compared to fiscal 2007. North American sales increased .9% reflecting steady
U.S. demand, increased sales in Canada, increased penetration in Mexico, and the
acquisition of Kinemetrics on July 17, 2007, offset by lower Evans sales to
Sears. Excluding the Evans Rule Division, North American sales increased $2.6
million (2%). Foreign sales (excluding North America) increased 22% (8% increase
in local currency) driven by the strengthening of the Brazilian Real against the
U.S. dollar, the strengthening of the British Pound against the U.S. dollar,
growing sales for the Chinese operations ($2.8 million increase) and greater
expansion worldwide into newer markets, including Eastern Europe, the Middle
East and China.
Earnings
(loss) before taxes (benefit) Pre-tax earnings for fiscal 2008
was $16.9 million compared to pre-tax earnings of $8.9 million for fiscal 2007.
This represents an increase in pre-tax earnings of $8.0 million or an increase
of 90% over the prior year. This is comprised of an increase in gross margin of
$10.4 million and other income of $4.7 million, offset by an increase in
selling, general and administrative costs of $7.1 million. The gross margin
percentage increased from 29.6% in fiscal 2007 to 31.5% in fiscal 2008. This was
primarily driven by better overhead absorption at certain domestic plants due to
higher sales volumes ($1 million), the impact of lean manufacturing initiatives,
a reduction in cost of sales at the Evans Rule Division, and better overhead
absorption at the U.K. and Brazilian operations ($2.0 million). This increase
was achieved in spite of certain material cost increases that could not be fully
passed on to customers. Effects from LIFO liquidations in fiscal 2008
and 2007 were not considered material. Gross margins for fiscal 2009 could again
be adversely impacted by material cost increases which cannot be fully passed on
to customers and by increased competitive pressures in various markets. As
indicated above, selling, general and administrative costs increased $7.1
million from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008, as the percentage of sales increased
slightly from 25.0% in fiscal 2007 to 25.9% in fiscal 2008. The increase is a
result of increased sales commissions, profit sharing and bonuses ($2.5
million), increases in marketing and advertising primarily relating to new
product introductions ($.3 million), and the inclusion of nearly a full year of
Kinemetrics’ selling, general and administrative costs in fiscal 2008 ($1.9
million), and an increase in bad debt write-offs ($.1 million). The increase in
other income (expense) from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008 of $4.7 million is a net
of increased net interest income, increased net exchange gains and the higher
gain on the sale of the Glendale, AZ facility ($1.7 million) in fiscal 2008
versus the gain on the sale of the Alum Bank plant in fiscal 2007 ($.3 million).
The Company currently includes the Evans North Charleston facility on June 28,
2008 Balance Sheet as an asset held for sale of $1.9 million. Although the
Company expects to sell this for a gain, no estimate is available at this time
given current market conditions.
Significant
Fourth Quarter Activity As shown in footnote 13 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements, only $2.2 million of the $10.8 million of net
income realized during fiscal 2008 was earned in the fourth
quarter. This reflects the recording of the profit sharing plan
accrual of $.9 million for eligible domestic
11
employees
and a $.2 million accrual for executive bonuses. Both of these plans
were approved by the Company’s Board of Directors in June 2008 and as such, the
entire year’s accrual was recorded in the fourth quarter. In
addition, certain offsetting adjustments were made for transfer pricing and
return-to-provision adjustments netting to $.3 million in the fourth
quarter.
Income
Taxes The effective income tax rate was 36.0% for fiscal 2008,
reflecting a combined federal, state and foreign worldwide rate adjusted for
permanent book/tax differences, the most significant of which is the deduction
allowable for the Brazilian dividend paid in December 2007. The effective tax
rate for fiscal 2007 was 25%, reflecting the benefits of a release of tax
reserves, the elimination of the valuation allowances for certain state and
foreign NOL’s and the benefit of the tax treatment of the Brazilian dividend. A
net reduction resulted from a release of tax reserves, resulting from the close
out of certain examination years and additional analysis of transfer pricing
exposure and return to provision adjustments resulting from the preparation of
various tax returns. Valuation allowances were eliminated during fiscal 2007 for
certain state and foreign NOL’s as strong earnings in fiscal 2007 increased the
likelihood of realizing the benefits of those NOL’s. Only minor changes in
valuation allowances were made in fiscal 2008. The change in the effective rate
percentage from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008 primarily relates to the fiscal 2007
release of the tax reserves and valuation allowance, as well as additional
reserves for transfer pricing issues provided in fiscal 2008.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Fiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
Overview For
fiscal 2007, the Company realized net income of $6.6 million, or $1.00 per basic
and diluted share compared to a net loss of $3.8 million or $(.57) per basic and
diluted share. This represents an increase in net income of $10.4 million
comprised of an increase in gross margin of $19.1 million, an increase of $3.3
million in selling, general and administrative costs, an increase in other
expense of $.1 million and the change in the income tax line from a $3.1 million
benefit to a $2.2 million tax expense. The above items are discussed in more
detail below.
Net
Sales Net sales for fiscal 2007 were up $21.4 million or 11%
compared to fiscal 2006. North American sales were up 9% reflecting a steady
U.S. economy and the inclusion of a full year of Tru-Stone ($12.5 million),
which was acquired in April 2006. This was offset by a decline in sales for the
Evans Rule Division ($7.3 million decrease). Excluding the Evans Rule Division
and Tru-Stone, domestic sales increased $5.8 million (6%). Foreign sales
(excluding North America) were up 13% (4% increase in local currency) driven by
strong European sales from the U.K. operations ($1.6 million increase), the
strengthening of the Brazilian Real against the U.S. dollar, the strengthening
of the British Pound and the Euro against the U.S. dollar, and growing sales for
the Chinese operations ($2.8 million increase).
Earnings
(loss) before taxes (benefit) Pre-tax earnings for fiscal 2007
was $8.9 million compared to a pre-tax loss of $6.9 million for fiscal 2006.
This represents an increase of pre-tax earnings of $15.8 million, which is
effectively an increase in gross margin of $19.1 million offset by an increase
in selling, general and administrative costs of $3.3 million. The gross margin
percentage increased from 23.2% in fiscal 2006 to 29.6% in fiscal 2007. This was
primarily driven by better overhead absorption at domestic plants (other than
the Evans Rule Division) due to higher sales volumes ($9.2 million), a reduction
in cost of sales at the Evans Rule Division, the impact of a full year of gross
margin contribution from Tru-Stone ($4.1 million), and better overhead
absorption at the U.K. and Brazilian operations ($1.5 million). Effects from
LIFO liquidations in fiscal 2007 and 2006 were not considered material. As
indicated above, selling, general and administrative costs increased $3.3
million from fiscal 2006 to fiscal 2007, although the percentage of sales
dropped from 26.1% in fiscal 2006 to 25.0% in fiscal 2007. The increase of $3.3
million is primarily a result of increases in professional fees ($.8 million),
increases in marketing and advertising relating to new product introductions
($.3 million), bad debt write-offs ($.6 million) and the inclusion of a full
year of Tru-Stone’s selling, general and administrative costs in fiscal 2007.
The full year versus the two-month period in fiscal 2006 adds $1.9 million of
these costs from Tru-Stone. The increase in other expense from fiscal 2006 to
fiscal 2007 of $.1 million is a net of increased interest expense and increased
impairment charges
12
on fixed
assets, offset by declining exchange losses and the gain on the sale of the Alum
Bank plant in fiscal 2007.
Significant
Fourth Quarter Activity As shown in Footnote 13 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements, $3.9 million of the $6.6 million of net
income realized during fiscal 2007 was earned in the fourth quarter. This is
primarily a result of higher operating income levels for the fourth quarter for
most divisions compared to the average quarterly earnings for the first nine
months of fiscal 2007 ($.7 million). Also, because of the Company’s 52/53 week
year convention, fiscal 2007 included an extra week of sales and related
earnings ($.2 million). Also, certain adjustments were made to capitalize
variances into inventory amounting to $.6 million. Finally, as discussed under
Income Taxes below, tax reserves were released and return to provision
adjustments were made netting to $.3 million. Also, valuation allowances of $.9
million were eliminated in the fourth quarter for certain state and foreign
NOL’s as a strong earnings trend evidenced in recent periods increased the
likelihood of realizing the benefits of those NOL’s.
Income
Taxes The effective tax rate for fiscal 2007 was 25%,
reflecting the benefits of a release of tax reserves, the elimination of the
valuation allowances for certain state and foreign NOL’s and the benefit of the
tax treatment of the Brazilian dividend. A net reduction resulted from a release
of tax reserves, resulting from the close out of certain examination years and
additional analysis of transfer pricing exposure and return to provision
adjustments resulting from the preparation of the fiscal 2006 tax returns.
Valuation allowances were eliminated for certain state and foreign NOL’s as
strong earnings in fiscal 2007 increased the likelihood of realizing the
benefits of those NOL’s. The effective rate for fiscal 2006 was 45% reflecting
the benefits of a release of tax reserves and return to provision adjustments,
offset by increases in valuation allowances for state NOL’s, foreign NOL’s and
foreign tax credits. The release of tax reserves is a result of the close out of
certain examination years and the reduced likelihood of future assessment due to
change in circumstances. The increases in valuation allowances reflected the
uncertainty caused by fiscal 2006 losses.
Financial
Instrument Market Risk Market risk is the potential change in
a financial instrument’s value caused by fluctuations in interest and currency
exchange rates, and equity and commodity prices. The Company’s operating
activities expose it to risks that are continually monitored, evaluated and
managed. Proper management of these risks helps reduce the likelihood of
earnings volatility.
As of
June 28, 2008, the Company held $2.5 million in AAA-rated auction rate
securities for which there are no current active quoted market prices. The
Company expects to liquidate approximately $1.7 million in September 2008
through November 2008 through the broker’s announced buyback program for auction
rate securities. It is uncertain as to the timing and final
liquidation value of the remaining $.8 million of auction rate securities;
accordingly, these have been classified as long-term. See Note 2 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
At June
28, 2008, the Company was party to an interest swap arrangement more fully
described in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company does
not engage in tracking, market-making or other speculative activities in
derivatives markets. The Company does not enter into long-term supply contracts
with either fixed prices or quantities. The Company engages in a limited amount
of hedging activity to minimize the impact of foreign currency fluctuations. Net
foreign monetary assets are approximately $2.8 million.
A 10%
change in interest rates would not have a significant impact on the aggregate
net fair value of the Company’s interest rate sensitive financial instruments
(primarily variable rate investments of $18.0 million) or the cash flows or
future earnings associated with those financial instruments. A 10% change in
interest rates would impact the fair value of the Company’s fixed rate
investments of approximately $1.8 million by $11,000. See Note 10 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for details concerning the Company’s long-term
debt outstanding of $5.8 million.
13
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Years
ended in June ($000)
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Cash
provided by operations
|
$ | 19,012 | $ | 12,849 | $ | 8,456 | ||||||
Cash
(used in) investing activities
|
(13,584 | ) | (852 | ) | (17,538 | ) | ||||||
Cash
provided by (used in) financing activities
|
(6,851 | ) | (8,652 | ) | 8,406 |
The
significant increase in cash provided by operations from fiscal 2007 to fiscal
2008 is primarily driven by the $4.1 million improvement in net earnings, and an
increase in non-cash items and other working capital changes ($2.0 million). The
non-cash items relating to depreciation and amortization are not expected to
change significantly over the next few years.
Despite
the operating loss in fiscal 2006, cash provided by operations has been positive
in all periods presented. During fiscal 2006, receivables increased as a result
of higher overall sales and a change in the process in which the Brazilian
receivables are collected.
“Retirement
benefits” under noncash expenses in the detailed cash flow statement shows the
effect on operating cash flow of the Company’s pension and retiree medical
plans. Primarily because the Company’s domestic defined benefit plan is
overfunded, retirement benefits in total generated approximately $2.8 million,
$1.1 million and $.7 million of noncash income in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Consolidated retirement benefit expense (income) was approximately
$(1.7) million in 2008, $.1 million in 2007, and $1.2 million in
2006.
As
disclosed in Note 9 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, the
overfunding status has decreased due to current market conditions. However, the
Company does not expect to be required to provide any funding to its domestic
pension plan over the next several years.
At the
start of fiscal 2007, the Company switched from self-funding to a fixed monthly
premium for both its domestic employee health care plans and its domestic
worker’s compensation plan. This has reduced the cash flow uncertainty related
to these Company expenses.
The
Company’s investing activities consisted of the acquisition of Tru-Stone in
fiscal 2006 and the acquisition of Kinemetric Engineering in fiscal 2008,
expenditures for plant and equipment, the investment of cash not immediately
needed for operations and the proceeds from the sale of Company assets.
Expenditures for plant and equipment have increased over each of the three
years, although they are less than depreciation expense in each of those years.
The Company will continue to invest in plant and equipment as necessary to
optimize the operations of its plants. Details of the Tru-Stone and Kinemetric
acquisitions are disclosed in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Cash
flows used in financing activities are primarily the payment of dividends. The
Company increased its dividend from $.10 per share to $.12 per share during the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. The Company expects to consistently pay this
increased dividend in the near future. The proceeds from the sale of stock under
the various stock plans has historically been used to purchase treasury shares,
although in recent years such purchases have been curtailed. Purchases for
fiscal 2008 amounted to $.3 million. Overall debt has decreased from $18.1
million at the end of fiscal 2006 to $10.0 million at the end of fiscal 2008,
primarily due to the reduction of capitalized lease obligations in Brazil and
the principal payments of $4.8 million on the Company’s Reducing Revolver Credit
Facility.
Effects
of translation rate changes on cash primarily result from the movement of the
U.S. dollar against the British Pound, the Euro and the Brazilian Real. The
Company uses a limited number of forward contracts to hedge some of this
activity and a natural hedge strategy of paying for foreign purchases in local
currency when economically advantageous.
14
Liquidity
and Credit Arrangements
The
Company believes it maintains sufficient liquidity and has the resources to fund
its operations in the near term. If the Company is unable to maintain consistent
profitability, additional steps will have to be taken in order to maintain
liquidity, including plant consolidations and workforce reductions. The Company
maintains a $10 million line of credit, of which, as of June 28, 2008, $1.0
million was utilized in the form of standby letters of credit for insurance
purposes. Although the credit line is not currently collateralized, it is
possible, based on the Company’s financial performance, that in the future the
Company will have to provide collateral in order to maintain the credit
agreement. Currently the Company has significant excess on all covenant
requirements and the cost of the Company’s interest rate swap agreement
described in Note 2 of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements is not
material. The Company has a working capital ratio of 4.8 to one as of June 28,
2008 and 4.8 to one as of June 30, 2007.
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The
Company does not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements as defined
under the Securities and Exchange Commission rules.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The
preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the
amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying
notes. The second footnote to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements
describes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the
preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
Judgments,
assumptions, and estimates are used for, but not limited to, the allowance for
doubtful accounts receivable and returned goods; inventory allowances; income
tax reserves; employee turnover, discount, and return rates used to calculate
pension obligations.
Future
events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty.
Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment.
Actual results inevitably will differ from those estimates, and such differences
may be material to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. The
following sections describe the Company’s critical accounting
policies.
Sales of
merchandise and freight billed to customers are recognized when title passes and
all substantial risks of ownership change, which generally occurs either upon
shipment or upon delivery based upon contractual terms. Sales are net of
provisions for cash discounts, returns, customer discounts (such as volume or
trade discounts), cooperative advertising and other sales related discounts.
Outbound shipping costs absorbed by the Company and inbound freight included in
material purchases are included in the cost of sales.
The
allowance for doubtful accounts of $.7 million and $1.6 million at the end of
fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively, is based on our assessment of the
collectibility of specific customer accounts, the aging of our accounts
receivable. While the Company believes that the allowance for doubtful accounts
is adequate, if there is a deterioration of a major customer’s credit
worthiness, actual defaults are higher than our previous experience, or actual
future returns do not reflect historical trends, the estimates of the
recoverability of the amounts due the Company and sales could be adversely
affected.
Inventory
purchases and commitments are based upon future demand forecasts. If there is a
sudden and significant decrease in demand for our products or there is a higher
risk of inventory obsolescence because of rapidly changing technology and
requirements, the Company may be required to increase the inventory reserve and,
as a result, gross profit margin could be adversely affected.
The
Company generally values property, plant and equipment (PP&E) at historical
cost less accumulated depreciation. Impairment losses are recorded when
indicators of impairment, such as plant closures, are present and the
undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than
the carrying
15
amount.
The Company continually reviews for such impairment and believes that PP&E
is being carried at its appropriate value.
The
Company assesses the fair value of its goodwill, generally based upon a
discounted cash flow methodology. The discounted cash flows are estimated
utilizing various assumptions regarding future revenue and expenses, working
capital, terminal value, and market discount rates. If the carrying amount of
the goodwill is greater than the fair value, goodwill impairment may be present.
An impairment charge is recognized to the extent the recorded goodwill exceeds
the implied fair value of goodwill.
Accounting
for income taxes requires estimates of future benefits and tax liabilities. Due
to temporary differences in the timing of recognition of items included in
income for accounting and tax purposes, deferred tax assets or liabilities are
recorded to reflect the impact arising from these differences on future tax
payments. With respect to recorded tax assets, the Company assesses the
likelihood that the asset will be realized. If realization is in doubt because
of uncertainty regarding future profitability or enacted tax rates, the Company
provides a valuation allowance related to the asset. Should any significant
changes in the tax law or the estimate of the necessary valuation allowance
occur, the Company would record the impact of the change, which could have a
material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Pension
and postretirement medical costs and obligations are dependent on assumptions
used by actuaries in calculating such amounts. These assumptions include
discount rates, healthcare cost trends, inflation, salary growth, long-term
return on plan assets, employee turnover rates, retirement rates, mortality and
other factors. These assumptions are made based on a combination of external
market factors, actual historical experience, long-term trend analysis, and an
analysis of the assumptions being used by other companies with similar plans.
Actual results that differ from assumptions are accumulated and amortized over
future periods. Significant differences in actual experience or significant
changes in assumptions would affect pension and other postretirement benefit
costs and obligations. See also Employee Benefit Plans (Note 9 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements).
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
The
following table summarizes future estimated payment obligations by period. The
majority of the obligations represent commitments for production needs in the
normal course of business.
Payments
due by period (in millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
<1yr.
|
1-3yrs.
|
3-5yrs.
|
>5yrs.
|
||||||||||||||||
Post-retirement
benefit obligations
|
$ | 8.3 | $ | 0.7 | $ | 1.6 | $ | 1.6 | $ | 4.4 | ||||||||||
Long-term
debt obligations
|
7.2 | 2.4 | 4.8 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Capital
lease obligations
|
0.5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Operating
lease obligations
|
4.3 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 0.2 | — | |||||||||||||||
Interest
payments
|
1.7 | 0.4 | 1.3 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Purchase
obligations
|
9.0 | 8.9 | 0.1 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 31.0 | $ | 14.6 | $ | 10.2 | $ | 1.8 | $ | 4.4 |
It is
assumed that post-retirement benefit obligations would continue on an annual
basis from 2013 to 2017. Total future payments for other obligations cannot be
reasonably estimated beyond year 5.
ANNUAL
NYSE CEO CERTIFICATION AND SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302
CERTIFICATIONS
In fiscal
2008, the Company submitted an unqualified “Annual CEO Certification” to the New
York Stock Exchange as required by Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock
Exchange Listed Company Manual. Further, the Company has filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission the certifications required by Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as exhibits to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
16
Item 8 - Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
Contents:
|
|
Page
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
18
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
|
|
19
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
20
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
|
21
|
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
22
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
23-44
|
17
To the
Board of Directors and Stockholders of
The L.S.
Starrett Company
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of the L.S. Starrett
Company and subsidiaries (“the Company”) as of June 28, 2008 and June 30,
2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’
equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended June 28, 2008. Our audits of the basic
financial statements included the financial statement schedule listed in the
index appearing under Item 15 (a)(2). These consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our
audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of The L.S. Starrett Company
and subsidiaries as of June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007, and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended June 28, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the
related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.
As
discussed in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements, on July 1,
2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48,
“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement
109” issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. As
discussed in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements, as of June 30,
2007, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No.
158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans.”
As
discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, an error resulting
in an understatement of previously reported deferred tax liabilities was
discovered by Company management during the current
year. Accordingly, retained earnings has been restated as of June 25,
2005.
We also
have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting as of June 28, 2008, based on criteria
established in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our accompanying report dated
September 11, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP
Boston,
Massachusetts
September
11, 2008
18
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
For the
three years ended on June 28, 2008
(in
thousands of dollars except per share data)
6/28/08
|
6/30/07
|
6/24/06
|
||||||||||
(52
weeks)
|
(53
weeks)
|
(52
weeks)
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 242,371 | $ | 222,356 | $ | 200,916 | ||||||
Cost
of goods sold
|
(166,133 | ) | (156,530 | ) | (154,234 | ) | ||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
(62,707 | ) | (55,596 | ) | (52,386 | ) | ||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
3,340 | (1,378 | ) | (1,210 | ) | |||||||
Earnings
(loss) before income taxes
|
16,871 | 8,852 | (6,914 | ) | ||||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
6,040 | 2,199 | (3,132 | ) | ||||||||
Net
earnings (loss)
|
$ | 10,831 | $ | 6,653 | $ | (3,782 | ) | |||||
Basic
and diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
$ | 1.64 | $ | 1.00 | $ | (0.57 | ) | |||||
Average
outstanding shares used in per share calculations (in
thousands):
|
||||||||||||
Basic
|
6,596 | 6,663 | 6,664 | |||||||||
Diluted
|
6,605 | 6,671 | 6,664 | |||||||||
Dividends
per share
|
$ | 0.52 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.40 | ||||||
See notes
to consolidated financial statements
19
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
For the
three years ended on June 28, 2008
(in
thousands of dollars)
6/28/08
|
6/30/07
|
6/24/06
|
||||||||||
(52
weeks)
|
(53
weeks)
|
(52
weeks)
|
||||||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 10,831 | $ | 6,653 | $ | (3,782 | ) | |||||
Noncash
operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
Gain
from sale of real estate
|
(1,703 | ) | (299 | ) | — | |||||||
Depreciation
|
9,535 | 10,047 | 10,031 | |||||||||
Amortization
|
1,240 | 1,103 | 134 | |||||||||
Impairment
of fixed assets
|
95 | 724 | — | |||||||||
Net
long-term tax payable
|
847 | — | — | |||||||||
Deferred
taxes
|
1,221 | 1,646 | (3,814 | ) | ||||||||
Unrealized
transaction gains
|
(990 | ) | (592 | ) | (118 | ) | ||||||
Retirement
benefits
|
(3,332 | ) | (1,519 | ) | (333 | ) | ||||||
Working
capital changes:
|
||||||||||||
Receivables
|
893 | (2,720 | ) | 1,420 | ||||||||
Inventories
|
(45 | ) | 2,252 | 4,182 | ||||||||
Other
current assets
|
(157 | ) | (689 | ) | (2,922 | ) | ||||||
Other
current liabilities
|
478 | (3,127 | ) | 4,054 | ||||||||
Prepaid
pension cost and other
|
99 | (630 | ) | (396 | ) | |||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
19,012 | 12,849 | 8,456 | |||||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Purchase
of Tru-Stone
|
— | — | (19,986 | ) | ||||||||
Purchase
of Kinemetric Engineering
|
(2,060 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Additions
to plant and equipment
|
(8,924 | ) | (6,574 | ) | (6,476 | ) | ||||||
Increase
(Decrease) in investments
|
(5,016 | ) | 5,328 | 8,924 | ||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of real estate
|
2,416 | 394 | — | |||||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(13,584 | ) | (852 | ) | (17,538 | ) | ||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Proceeds
from short-term borrowings
|
5,007 | 2,934 | 3,430 | |||||||||
Short-term
debt repayments
|
(5,800 | ) | (3,115 | ) | (3,089 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds
from long-term borrowings
|
— | 203 | 10,685 | |||||||||
Long-term
debt repayments
|
(2,929 | ) | (4,589 | ) | — | |||||||
Common
stock issued
|
620 | 446 | 363 | |||||||||
Treasury
shares purchased
|
(317 | ) | (1,867 | ) | (317 | ) | ||||||
Dividends
|
(3,432 | ) | (2,664 | ) | (2,666 | ) | ||||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(6,851 | ) | (8,652 | ) | 8,406 | |||||||
Effect
of translation rate changes on cash
|
230 | 387 | 173 | |||||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash
|
(1,193 | ) | 3,732 | (503 | ) | |||||||
Cash
beginning of year
|
7,708 | 3,976 | 4,479 | |||||||||
Cash
end of year
|
$ | 6,515 | $ | 7,708 | $ | 3,976 | ||||||
Supplemental
cash flow information:
|
||||||||||||
Interest
received
|
$ | 1,648 | $ | 1,194 | $ | 1,107 | ||||||
Interest
paid
|
914 | 1,713 | 1,268 | |||||||||
Taxes
paid, net
|
3,546 | 1,231 | 1,403 |
20
THE L.S. STARRETT
COMPANY
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(in
thousands except share data)
June
28, 2008
|
June
30, 2007
(Restated)
See
Note 1
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 6,515 | $ | 7,708 | ||||
Investments
|
19,806 | 14,503 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $701 and
$1,623)
|
39,627 | 37,314 | ||||||
Inventories:
|
||||||||
Raw
materials and supplies
|
15,104 | 17,130 | ||||||
Goods
in process and finished parts
|
16,653 | 17,442 | ||||||
Finished
goods
|
29,400 | 22,744 | ||||||
Total
inventories
|
61,157 | 57,316 | ||||||
Current
deferred income tax asset (Note 8)
|
5,996 | 3,866 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
5,535 | 4,920 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
138,636 | 125,627 | ||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, at cost, net (Note 6)
|
60,945 | 58,883 | ||||||
Property
held for sale (Note 6)
|
1,912 | 2,653 | ||||||
Intangible
assets (less accumulated amortization of $2,477 and $1,237) (Note
4)
|
3,764 | 4,063 | ||||||
Goodwill
(Note 4)
|
6,032 | 5,260 | ||||||
Pension
asset (Note 9)
|
34,643 | 36,656 | ||||||
Other
assets (Note 2)
|
1,877 | 869 | ||||||
Long-term
taxes receivable (Note 8)
|
2,476 | – | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 250,285 | $ | 234,011 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Notes
payable and current maturities (Note 10)
|
$ | 4,121 | $ | 4,737 | ||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
18,041 | 16,674 | ||||||
Accrued
salaries and wages
|
6,907 | 4,869 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
29,069 | 26,280 | ||||||
Long-term
taxes payable (Note 8)
|
8,522 | 4,852 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes (Note 8)
|
6,312 | 6,004 | ||||||
Long-term
debt (Note 10)
|
5,834 | 8,520 | ||||||
Postretirement
benefit and pension liability (Note 9)
|
13,775 | 11,241 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
63,512 | 56,897 | ||||||
Stockholders’
equity (Note 11):
|
||||||||
Class A
common stock $1 par (20,000,000 shrs. auth.; 5,708,100 outstanding at June
28, 2008, 5,632,017 outstanding at June 30, 2007)
|
5,708 | 5,632 | ||||||
Class
B common stock $1 par (10,000,000 shrs. auth.; 906,065 outstanding at June
28, 2008, 962,758 outstanding at June 30, 2007)
|
906 | 963 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
49,613 | 49,282 | ||||||
Retained
earnings reinvested and employed in the business
|
134,109 | 127,023 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(3,563 | ) | (5,786 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
186,773 | 177,114 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’equity
|
$ | 250,285 | $ | 234,011 |
See notes
to consolidated financial statements
21
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
For the
three years ended on June 28, 2008 (in thousands)
Common
Stock
Out-standing
($1
Par)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class
A
|
Class
B
|
Addi-
tional
Paid-in
Capital
|
Retained
Earnings
|
Accumulated
Other
Com-
prehensive
Loss
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
June 25, 2005, as previously reported
|
$ | 5,458 | $ | 1,206 | 50,466 | 130,361 | (19,065 | ) | 168,426 | |||||||||||||||
Impact
of restatement (Note 1)
|
(879 | ) | (879 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
June 25, 2005, as restated
|
$ | 5,458 | $ | 1,206 | 50,466 | 129,482 | (19,065 | ) | 167,547 | |||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
(3,782 | ) | (3,782 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
net loss on investments and swap agreement
|
(103 | ) | (103 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum
pension liability, net
|
1,124 | 1,124 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Translation
gain, net
|
2,135 | 2,135 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
(626 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
($0.40 per share)
|
(2,666 | ) | (2,666 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury
shares:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchased
|
(20 | ) | – | (297 | ) | (317 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Issued
|
16 | – | 237 | 253 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of stock under ESPP
|
– | 9 | 163 | 172 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion
|
175 | (175 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
June 24, 2006, as restated
|
$ | 5,629 | $ | 1,040 | 50,569 | 123,034 | (15,909 | ) | 164,363 | |||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
6,653 | 6,653 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
net loss on investments and swap agreement
|
(15 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum
pension liability, net
|
1,775 | 1,775 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Translation
gain, net
|
7,280 | 7,280 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
15,693 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
($0.40 per share)
|
(2,664 | ) | (2,664 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury
shares:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchased
|
(105 | ) | – | (1,762 | ) | (1,867 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Issued
|
23 | – | 320 | 343 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of stock under ESPP
|
– | 8 | 155 | 163 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion
|
85 | (85 | ) | – | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2007 (before FAS 158), as restated
|
$ | 5,632 | $ | 963 | $ | 49,282 | $ | 127,023 | $ | (6,869 | ) | $ | 176,031 | |||||||||||
Adjustment
to initially adopt FAS 158(1):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension
Plans (net of tax benefits)
|
(1,365 | ) | (1,365 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Post-retirement
benefits (net of tax liability)
|
2,448 | 2,448 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2007, as restated
|
$ | 5,632 | $ | 963 | $ | 49,282 | $ | 127,023 | $ | (5,786 | ) | $ | 177,114 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
10,831 | 10,831 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
net loss on investments and swap agreement
|
(281 | ) | (281 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum
pension liability, net
|
(4,911 | ) | (4,911 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Translation
gain, net
|
7,415 | 7,415 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
13,054 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax
adjustment for FIN 48 adoption
|
(313 | ) | (313 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
($0.52 per share)
|
(3,432 | ) | (3,432 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury
shares:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchased
|
(20 | ) | – | (297 | ) | (317 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Issued
|
24 | – | 394 | 418 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of stock under ESPP
|
– | 15 | 234 | 249 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion
|
72 | (72 | ) | – | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
June 28, 2008
|
$ | 5,708 | $ | 906 | $ | 49,613 | $ | 134,109 | $ | (3,563 | ) | $ | 186,773 |
22
Note:
Cumulative balances of unrealized net gain on investments, amounts not yet
recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost and translation gain at
June 28, 2008 are $(340,000), $(3,828,000), and $605,000
respectively.
(1)
Components of adjustment to initially adopt FAS 158 are as follows:
Gross
|
Tax
|
Net
|
||||||||||
1.
Pension Plan
|
(2,242 | ) | 877 | (1,365 | ) | |||||||
2.
Post-retirement benefits:
|
4,019 | (1,571 | ) | 2,448 | ||||||||
Net
effect of adoption
|
1,777 | (694 | ) | 1,083 |
See notes
to consolidated financial statements
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
1.
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND RESTATEMENT
The
Company is in the business of manufacturing industrial, professional and
consumer measuring and cutting tools and related products. The largest consumer
of these products is the metalworking industry, but others include automotive,
aviation, marine, farm, do-it-yourselfers and tradesmen such as builders,
carpenters, plumbers and electricians.
The
Company has restated its consolidated financial statements as of June 25, 2005
to correct certain tax liabilities, which resulted in a decrease in
stockholders’ equity of $879,000. The restatement reflects corrections in the
measurement of deferred income tax liabilities relating to depreciation. The
principal corrections pre-date all periods reported in the Company’s financial
statements, and, as a result, there are no financial statement effects to the
statements of operations for each of the years ended June 28, 2008, June 30,
2007 and June 24, 2006. A summary of the aggregate effect of the restatement on
the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2007 is shown as
follows:
As
of June 30, 2007
|
||||||||
Previously
Reported
|
As
Restated
|
|||||||
Changes
to Consolidated Balance Sheet:
|
||||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
$ | 5,125 | $ | 6,004 | ||||
Total
liabilities
|
56,018 | 56,897 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
127,902 | 127,023 | ||||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
177,993 | 177,114 |
2.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of
consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts
of The L. S. Starrett Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are
wholly-owned. All significant intercompany items have been eliminated. The
Company’s fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in June. Fiscal 2007 represents
a 53 week year while fiscal 2008 and 2006 represent 52 week years. The fiscal
years of the Company’s major foreign subsidiaries end in May.
Financial instruments and
derivatives: The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of
cash, investments and receivables, current liabilities and long term debt.
Current assets and liabilities, except investments, are stated at cost, which
approximates fair market value. Long-term debts, which are at current market
interest rates, also approximate fair market value. The Company has entered into
an interest rate swap agreement to limit the amount of exposure resulting from
increases in its variable LIBOR rate on its $12 million Reducing Revolver. This
is being accounted for as an effective cash flow hedge under SFAS
23
133,
“Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” The amount of
decrease in other comprehensive income for fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 relating
to the swap agreement is $55,767, $50,406 and $22,934, respectively. The
Company’s U.K. subsidiary entered into various forward exchange contracts during
fiscal 2007. The amount of contracts outstanding as of May 31, 2008 (foreign
subsidiary year-end) amounted to $3.1 million (dollar equivalent). The value of
these contracts do not differ materially from the corresponding
receivables.
Cash: Cash is
comprised of cash on hand and demand deposits. Cash in foreign locations
amounted to $4.1 million and $6.3 million at June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007,
respectively.
Investments:
Investments as of June 28, 2008 consist primarily of cash equivalents and
marketable securities such as certificates of deposits ($13.2 million),
municipal securities ($.7 million), money market investments ($3.2 million) and
short-term bonds ($2.5 million). Investments as of June 30, 2007 consist
primarily of cash equivalents and marketable securities such as certificates of
deposit ($7.7 million), municipal securities ($2.2 million) and short-term bonds
($4.6 million). Cost for these investments is not materially different than fair
value. The Company determines the appropriate classification of the investments
in marketable debt and equity securities at the time of purchase and reevaluates
such designation at each balance sheet date. The Company’s marketable debt and
equity securities have been classified and accounted for as available for sale.
The Company may or may not hold securities with stated maturities greater than
12 months until maturity. In response to changes in the availability of and the
yield on alternative investments as well as liquidity requirements, the Company
occasionally sells these securities prior to their stated maturities. As these
debt and equity securities are viewed by the Company as available to support
current operations, based on the provision of Accounting Research Bulletin No.
43, Chapter 3A, Working Capital-Current Assets and Liabilities, equity
securities, as well as debt securities with maturities beyond 12 months are
classified as current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
These securities are carried at fair value, with the unrealized gains and
losses, net of taxes, reported as a component of stockholders’ equity, except
for unrealized losses determined to be other than temporary which are recorded
as interest income and other, net. Any realized gains or losses on the sale of
marketable securities are determined on a specific identification method, and
such gains and losses are reflected as a component of interest income and other,
net. As of June 28, 2008, the Company had $2.8 million of auction rate
securities (ARS). The securities are AAA-rated bonds, most of which are
collateralized by federally guaranteed student loans. Due to the nationwide
liquidity crisis and the market failure for ARS, there are no active quoted
market prices and the Company may have to hold these ARS to achieve par value
upon redemption. In accordance with the Company’s policy, an unrealized loss of
$235,000 has been recorded in stockholders’ equity for these ARS based upon a
proxy of current market rates for similar debt offerings within the AAA-rated
ARS market. Of the total amount, $1.7 million remains classified as
Investments based upon the broker’s announced buy-back at par to occur in
September through November 2008. The remaining $.8 million has been classified
as long-term and included in Other Assets.
Accounts receivable:
Accounts receivable consist of trade receivables from customers. The provision
for bad debts amounted to $461,000, $370,000 and $596,000 in fiscal 2008, 2007
and 2006, respectively. In establishing the allowance for doubtful accounts,
management considers historical losses, the aging of receivables and existing
economic conditions.
Inventories:
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. For approximately 51% of
all inventories, cost is determined on a last-in, first-out (LIFO) basis. For
all other inventories, cost is determined on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis.
LIFO inventories were $17.9 million and $18.8 million at the end of fiscal 2008
and 2007, respectively, such amounts being approximately $27.5 and $28.4
million, respectively, less than if determined on a FIFO basis. The Company has
not adopted LIFO for its Tru-Stone and Kinemetric Engineering acquisitions and
does not expect to adopt LIFO for any future acquisitions.
Long-lived assets:
Buildings and equipment are depreciated using straight-line and accelerated
methods over estimated useful lives as follows: buildings and building
improvements 10 to 50 years, machinery and equipment 3 to 12 years. Long-lived
assets are reviewed for impairment when circumstances indicate the carrying
amount may not be recoverable. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported
at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Included in
buildings and building improvements and
24
machinery
and equipment at June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007 were $3.9 million and $4.2
million, respectively, of construction in progress. Also included in machinery
and equipment at June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007 were $273,000 and $44,000,
respectively, of capitalized interest cost.
Intangible assets and
goodwill: Intangibles are recorded at cost and are amortized on a
straight-line basis over a 5 year period. Goodwill represents costs in excess of
fair values assigned to the underlying net assets of acquired businesses.
Goodwill is not subject to amortization but is tested for impairment annually
and at any time when events suggest impairment may have occurred. The Company
assesses the fair value of its goodwill using impairment tests, generally based
upon a discounted cash flow methodology. The discounted cash flows are estimated
utilizing various assumptions regarding future revenue and expenses, working
capital, terminal value and market discount rates. In the event that the
carrying value of goodwill exceeds the fair value of the goodwill, an impairment
loss would be recorded for the amount of that excess.
Revenue recognition:
Sales of merchandise and freight billed to customers are recognized when title
passes and all substantial risks of ownership change, which generally occurs
either upon shipment or upon delivery based upon contractual terms. Sales are
net of provisions for cash discounts, returns, customer discounts (such as
volume or trade discounts), cooperative advertising and other sales related
discounts. While the Company does allow its customers the right to return in
certain circumstances, revenue is not deferred, but rather a reserve for sales
returns is provided based on experience, which historically has not been
significant.
Advertising costs:
The Company’s policy is to generally expense advertising costs as incurred
unless the benefit of the advertising covers more than one quarterly period
during the year. In these cases, the cost is amortized over the course of the
fiscal year. The Company has not generally amortized such costs over more than a
one year period. Advertising costs were expensed as follows $4.9 million in
fiscal 2008, $4.6 million in fiscal 2007 and $5.2 million in fiscal
2006.
Freight costs: The
cost of outbound freight absorbed by the Company for customers or the cost for
inbound freight included in material purchase cost are both included in cost of
sales.
Warranty expense: The
Company’s warranty obligation is generally one year from shipment to the end
user and is affected by product failure rates, material usage, and service
delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure. Any such failures tend
to occur soon after shipment. Historically, the Company has not incurred
significant predictable warranty expense and consequently its warranty reserves
are not material. In the event a material warranty liability is deemed probable,
a reserve is established for the event.
Income taxes:
Deferred tax expense results from differences in the timing of certain
transactions for financial reporting and tax purposes. Deferred taxes have not
been recorded on approximately $61 million of undistributed earnings of foreign
subsidiaries as of June 28, 2008 or the related unrealized translation
adjustments because such amounts are considered permanently invested. In
addition, it is possible that remittance taxes, if any, would be reduced by U.S.
foreign tax credits. Valuation allowances are recognized if, based on the
available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred
tax assets will not be realized.
Research and
development: Research and development costs were expensed as follows:
$2.4 million in fiscal 2008, $2.7 million in fiscal 2007 and $2.9 million in
fiscal 2006.
Earnings per share
(EPS): Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing earnings
available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution by
securities that could share in the earnings. The Company had 8,330, 7,904 and
5,540 of potentially dilutive common shares in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, resulting from shares issuable under its stock option plan. For
fiscal 2008 and 2007, these shares had no impact on the calculated per share
amounts due to their magnitude. These additional shares are not used for the
diluted EPS calculation in loss years.
25
Translation of foreign
currencies: Assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates in
effect on reporting dates, and income and expense items are translated at
average rates or rates in effect on transaction dates as appropriate. The
resulting differences due to changing exchange rates are charged or credited
directly to the “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss” account included as part
of stockholders’ equity.
Use of accounting
estimates: The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
sales and expenses during the reporting period. Judgments, assumptions and
estimates are used for, but not limited to, the allowance for doubtful accounts
receivable and returned goods; inventory allowances; income tax reserves;
employee turnover, discount, and return rates used to calculate pension
obligations; normal expense accruals for such things as workers compensation and
employee medical expenses. Amounts ultimately realized could differ from those
estimates.
Treasury stock:
Treasury stock is accounted for using the par value method.
Other: Accounts
payable and accrued expenses at June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007 consist
primarily of accounts payable ($9.0 million and $7.0 million), accrued benefits
($1.1 million and $1.3 million) and accrued taxes other than income ($2.1
million and $1.0 million) and accrued expenses and other ($5.8 million and $7.4
million).
Reclassifications:
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods as a result of the
current year presentation with no effect on net earnings.
3.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
The
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement 158 (FAS 158),
Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans: an amendment of FASB Statement No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R), which applies
to all single-employer defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit
plans.
FAS 158
requires recognition of the funded status of postretirement benefit plans in the
statement of financial position. An employer must recognize an asset or
liability in its statement of financial position for the differences between the
fair value of the plan assets and the projected benefit obligation (PBO)
(pension plans), or the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO)
(other postretirement plans). Changes in the plans’ funded status must be
recognized, in the year of change, in accumulated other comprehensive income
(AOCI). The Statement also will require entities to measure the funded status of
the plans as of the date of the year-end statement of financial position.
Adoption of this pronouncement was effective for the Company in fiscal 2007. The
recognition provision was adopted by the Company in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2007. The measurement provision is not required to be adopted by the Company
until fiscal 2009.
Based on
June 30, 2007 information, FAS 158 required an adjustment to increase the
Company’s accumulated other comprehensive loss in the amount of $2.2 million
(before tax effect), which represents the excess of the Company’s net prepaid
($38.9 million) over the Company’s PBO funded status ($36.7
million).
In
addition, the amount is offset by an increase in AOCI due to the retiree medical
plan. This plan has an increase to AOCI in the amount of $4.0 million (before
tax effect), which represents the excess of the Company’s accrued benefit
liability ($16.0 million) over the Company’s APBO funded status ($12.0
million).
The
estimated net result is an increase in AOCI of $1.8 million (before tax effect).
See footnote 9 for additional information.
26
The FASB
issued FASB Interpretation 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes: an
interpretation of FASB Statements No. 109, which clarifies Statement 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes (FIN 48), and indicates criteria that an individual
tax position must satisfy for some or all of the benefits of that position to be
recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 contains significant disclosure
requirements, including a tabular reconciliation of the beginning and ending
balances of unrecognized tax benefits, unrecognized tax benefits that, if
recognized, would affect the effective tax rate, as well as information
concerning tax positions for which a material change in the liability for
unrecognized tax benefits is reasonably possible within the next 12
months.
FIN 48
applies only to taxes that are subject to Statement 109. Uncertainties related
to taxes that are not based on a measurement of income, such as franchise taxes,
sales tax and ad valorem taxes, should be accounted for by applying FASB
Statement No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, and other applicable accounting
literature.
The
guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and the
Company adopted FIN 48 as of July 1, 2007. As a result of implementing FIN No.
48, the Company recognized a cumulative effect adjustment of $.3 million to
decrease the July 1, 2007 retained earnings balance and increase long-term tax
payable. Also in connection with this implementation, the Company reclassified
$1.8 million of unrecognized tax benefits into a long-term taxes receivable
representing the corollary effect of transfer pricing competent authority
adjustments.
The SEC
issued SAB No.108 to add Section N, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year
Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements,” to Topic 1, Financial Statements, of the Staff Accounting Bulletin
Series. Early application of the guidance of SAB No. 108 is encouraged in any
report for an interim period of the first fiscal year ending after November 15,
2006, filed after the publication of this SAB. This Staff Accounting Bulletin
had no impact on the Company’s financial reporting.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“FAS
157”), which addresses how companies should measure fair value when they are
required to use a fair value measure for recognition or disclosure purposes
under generally accepted accounting principles. FAS 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. In
February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-2, “Effective Date of
FASB Statement No. 157” (FSP 157-2), which partially defers the effective date
of FAS 157 for one year for non-financial assets and liabilities that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
non-recurring basis. Consequently, FAS 157 will be effective for the Company in
fiscal 2009 for financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value and
non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair
value on a recurring basis. As a result of the deferral, FAS 157 will be
effective in fiscal 2010 for non-recurring, non-financial assets and liabilities
that are recognized or disclosed at fair value. The Company is currently
evaluating the potential impact of FAS 157 on its financial position and results
of operations.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – including an amendment of FAS 115”
(“FAS 159”). The new statement allows entities to choose, at specified election
dates, to measure eligible financial assets and liabilities at fair value that
are not otherwise required to be measured at fair value. If a company elects the
fair value option for an eligible item, changes in that item’s fair value in
subsequent reporting periods must be recognized in current earnings. FAS 159 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is
currently evaluating the potential impact of FAS 159 on its financial position
and results of operations.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), “Business
Combinations” (“FAS 141(R)”). FAS 141(R) will significantly change the
accounting for business combinations. Under FAS 141(R), an acquiring entity will
be required to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a
transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. FAS
141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition
date is on or after the beginning of the first annual
27
reporting
period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company will be required to
adopt FAS 141(R) for fiscal 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of
FAS 141(R) to have a material impact on its consolidated financial
statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“FAS 160”). FAS
160 clarifies the classification of noncontrolling interests in consolidated
balance sheets and reporting transactions between the reporting entity and
holders of noncontrolling interests. Under this statement, noncontrolling
interests are considered equity and reported as an element of consolidated
equity. Further, net income encompasses all consolidated subsidiaries with
disclosure of the attribution of net income between controlling and
noncontrolling interests. FAS 160 is effective prospectively for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008. As of June 28, 2008, there were no
noncontrolling interests in any of the Company’s subsidiaries.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures About Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“FAS 161”),
which expands the disclosure requirements in FAS 133 about an entity’s
derivative instruments and hedging activities. FAS 161 expands the disclosure
provisions to apply to all entities with derivative instruments subject to FAS
133 and its related interpretations. The provisions also apply to related hedged
items, bifurcated derivatives, and nonderivative instruments that are designated
and qualify as hedging instruments. Entities with instruments subject to FAS 161
must provide more robust qualitative disclosures and expanded quantitative
disclosures. Such disclosures, as well as existing FAS 133 required disclosures,
generally will need to be presented for every annual and interim reporting
period. FAS 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after November 15, 2008. The Company has not determined the impact, if any, of
the adoption of FAS 161.
In April
2008, the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets” (“FAS 142-3”). FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be
considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the
useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS 142, “Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets” (“FAS 142”). The intent of FAS 142-3 is to improve the
consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS
142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the
asset under FAS 141(R) and other applicable accounting literature. FAS 142-3 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008 and must applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired
after the effective date. The Company has not determined the impact, if any, of
the adoption of FAS 142-3.
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles” (“FAS 162”). This statement is intended to improve financial
reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting
accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP. This
statement will be effective 60 days following the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendment
to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles.” The Company has not determined the impact, if
any, of the adoption of FAS 162.
4.
ACQUISITIONS
On April
28, 2006, the Company acquired 100% of the assets of Tru-Stone Technologies,
Inc. (“Tru-Stone”). The results of Tru-Stone’s operations have been included in
the Consolidated Financial Statements since that date. The purchase price for
Tru-Stone, including transaction costs, was approximately $20.0 million in cash,
including an upward adjustment based on the level of Tru-Stone’s net working
capital as of the closing date of the acquisition. The purchase price for the
acquisition of Tru-Stone was funded in part by proceeds from a Reducing Revolver
Credit Facility entered into in connection with the acquisition of Tru-Stone and
existing cash.
28
|
The
total purchase price was comprised as follows (in
thousands):
|
Purchase
price
|
$ | 19,736 | ||
Transaction
costs
|
250 | |||
Total
purchase price
|
$ | 19,986 |
The
acquisition of Tru-Stone has been accounted for under the purchase method. As
such, the cost to acquire Tru-Stone has been allocated to the respective assets
and liabilities acquired based on their estimated fair values at the closing of
the acquisition of Tru-Stone. The total purchase price has been allocated to
assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on management’s best estimates of
fair value, with the excess cost over the net tangible and identifiable
intangible assets acquired being allocated to goodwill. No in-process research
and development existed at the time of the acquisition. The final analysis was
completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 with the values reflected below.
These amounts differ from the preliminary numbers disclosed in the fiscal 2006
Form 10-K primarily as a result of amounts being reallocated from goodwill to
intangibles in the amount of $1,284 and from goodwill to buildings in the amount
of $2,036.
The
allocation of the total purchase price of Tru-Stone’s net tangible and
identifiable intangible assets was based on the estimated fair values as of
April 28, 2006. The excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and
identifiable intangible assets was allocated to goodwill. The total purchase
price of $19,986 has been allocated as follows (in thousands):
Purchase
price to be allocated:
|
||||
Accounts
receivable
|
$ | 1,638 | ||
Inventory
|
2,246 | |||
Other
current assets
|
118 | |||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
5,968 | |||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
(544 | ) | ||
Intangible
asset - non-compete agreements
|
1,330 | |||
Intangible
asset - customer lists
|
3,970 | |||
Goodwill
|
5,260 | |||
Total
purchase price
|
$ | 19,986 |
The
unaudited pro forma combined condensed statement of operations for the twelve
months ended June 24, 2006 gives effect to the acquisition of Tru-Stone as if it
had occurred on June 26, 2005. The Tru-Stone financial statements included in
the pro forma analysis are as of and for the fiscal year ended June 24,
2006.
The pro
forma information presented is for illustrative purposes only and is not
necessarily indicative of the operating results that would have been achieved if
the acquisition of Tru-Stone had occurred on June 26, 2005, nor is it indicative
of future operating results or financial position. The pro forma information
should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes thereto. The pro forma
adjustments are based upon available information and certain assumptions that
the Company believes are reasonable.
29
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR
THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 24, 2006
(dollars
in thousands, except for earnings per share)
Historical
L. S. Starrett*
|
Historical
Tru-Stone
|
Pro
Forma Adjustments
|
Pro Forma
Combined
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 199,216 | $ | 10,757 | $ | — | $ | 209,973 | ||||||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
152,764 | 7,613 | 533 | [a | ] | 160,124 | ||||||||||||||
(236 | ) | [b | ] | |||||||||||||||||
(550 | ) | [c | ] | |||||||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
46,452 | 3,144 | (253 | ) | 49,849 | |||||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
52,114 | 938 | 53,052 | |||||||||||||||||
Management
fees
|
— | 170 | (170 | ) | [d | ] | — | |||||||||||||
Amortization
of intangibles
|
— | 53 | 1,000 | [e | ] | 1,053 | ||||||||||||||
Income
(loss) from operations
|
(5,662 | ) | 1,983 | (577 | ) | (4,256 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest
expense, net
|
1,243 | — | 790 | [f | ] | 2,053 | ||||||||||||||
20 | [g | ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Other,
(income) expense
|
(33 | ) | 380 | 347 | ||||||||||||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
(6,872 | ) | 1,603 | (1,387 | ) | (6,656 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
(3,132 | ) | — | (483 | ) | [h | ] | (3,053 | ) | |||||||||||
562 | [h | ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (3,740 | ) | $ | 1,603 | $ | (1,466 | ) | $ | (3,603 | ) | |||||||||
Basic
and diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
$ | (0.56 | ) | $ | 0.24 | $ | (0.22 | ) | $ | (0.54 | ) | |||||||||
Average
outstanding shares used in per share calculations (in
thousands):
|
6,664 | 6,664 | 6,664 | 6,664 |
[Missing Graphic Reference]
*
|
Historical
results for fiscal 2006 exclusive of results of Tru-Stone since April 28,
2006.
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the above pro forma financial
statements.
Notes
to Pro Forma Combined Condensed Statement of Operations (in thousands) – Fiscal
Year Ended June 24, 2006
[a]
|
As
part of the purchase accounting, the allocation of the purchase price for
the acquisition of Tru-Stone resulted in increases to inventory to
properly state the acquired inventory at fair value in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. The increase is charged to cost
of sales as the acquired inventory is sold. With respect to the
acquisition of Tru-Stone, the Company expects this charge to be
approximately $533 based on the inventory balance as of the date of
acquisition.
|
[b]
|
Reflects
reduced depreciation expense on property, plant and equipment of $236 as a
result of the purchase price allocations. The average life of the
equipment is 7 years and the life of the building is 39
years.
|
[c]
|
Reflects
the reduction in cost of sales of $550 resulting from the consolidation of
the Company’s Mt. Airy granite processing facility into Tru-Stone’s
facility.
|
[d]
|
Represents
the elimination of Tru-Stone’s management fees of
$170.
|
[e]
|
Reflects
amortization of intangible assets of $1,000 net of the elimination of
historical amortization. Total intangible assets subject to amortization
were $5,300. The intangible assets were amortized over 5 years for both
the non-compete agreements and for customer
lists.
|
[f]
|
The
pro forma adjustment to interest expense of $790 represents the assumed
increase in interest expense associated with the Company’s new credit
facility, the net proceeds of which were used to finance the acquisition
of Tru-Stone, pay transaction costs and refinance existing
debt.
|
[g]
|
Reflects
the amortization of the deferred financing cost of $99 over the term of
the Revolving Credit Facility.
|
[h]
|
Represents
an estimated tax provision for the historical Tru-Stone results and an
estimated tax benefit related to the pro-forma adjustments for the fiscal
year ended June 24, 2006.
|
30
On July
17, 2007, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company entered into an asset
purchase agreement with Kinemetric Engineering, LLC (Kinemetric Engineering),
pursuant to which the Company purchased all of the assets of Kinemetric
Engineering for $2.3 million in cash. The asset purchase was financed through
existing cash and a draw on the Company’s existing line of credit. In connection
with the asset purchase agreement, $.3 million of the purchase price was placed
into escrow to support the indemnification obligations of Kinemetric Engineering
and its shareholders. Kinemetric Engineering specializes in precision
video-based metrology, specialty motion devices, and custom engineered systems
for measurement and inspection. This business unit also oversees the sales and
support of the Company’s high quality line of Starrett Optical Projectors. The
Company has completed the final purchase price allocation based on the fair
value of the assets and liabilities acquired. The total purchase price of $2.5
million was allocated to current assets ($.6 million), fixed assets ($.2
million), intangibles ($.9 million) and goodwill ($.8 million).
5.
CHARLESTON PLANT SHUTDOWN
During
fiscal 2006, the Evans Rule Division moved the majority of its manufacturing
operations out of its Charleston, S.C. plant to its leased facility in Santo
Domingo, Dominican Republic. As part of the move it was determined that certain
inventory and fixed assets would not be moved. As a result, during the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2006, charges of $.8 million were recorded under FAS 146,
Costs Associated with Exit Activities, for retention bonuses and reserves for
inventory and fixed assets relating to the shutdown of the Charleston plant. Of
this amount, approximately $.1 million was paid during fiscal 2007 relating to
retention bonuses. This payment fulfilled the Company’s remaining
liabilities.
6.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
2008
|
||||||||||||
Cost
|
Accumulated
Depreciation
|
Net
|
||||||||||
Land
|
$ | 1,608 | $ | — | $ | 1,608 | ||||||
Buildings
and building improvements
|
40,798 | (19,576 | ) | 21,222 | ||||||||
Machinery
and equipment
|
145,195 | (107,080 | ) | 38,115 | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | 187,601 | $ | (126,656 | ) | $ | 60,945 |
2007
|
||||||||||||
Cost
|
Accumulated
Depreciation
|
Net
|
||||||||||
Land
|
$ | 1,573 | $ | — | $ | 1,573 | ||||||
Buildings
and building improvements
|
38,751 | (17,959 | ) | 20,792 | ||||||||
Machinery
and equipment
|
137,885 | (101,367 | ) | 36,518 | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | 178,209 | $ | (119,326 | ) | $ | 58,883 |
As shown
on the face of the Balance Sheet, assets held for sale for fiscal 2007 represent
the Glendale distribution center, which was sold in October 2007, and the
property in North Charleston, S.C. Assets held for sale for fiscal 2008
represents the North Charleston building. Included in machinery and equipments
are capital leases of $3.9 million as of June 28, 2008 and $2.4 million as of
June 30, 2007 relating to the Brazilian operations (Note 10). This equipment
primarily represents factory machinery in their main plant. Operating lease
expense was $1.6 million, $1.1 million, and $1.0 million in fiscal 2008, 2007
and 2006, respectively. Operating lease payments for the next 5 years are as
follows:
Year
|
$000’s
|
|
2009
|
$1,530
|
|
2010
|
985
|
|
2011
|
504
|
|
2012
|
164
|
|
2013
|
72
|
31
7.
OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSE
|
Other
income and expense consists of the following (in
thousands):
|
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Interest
income
|
$ | 1,443 | $ | 1,194 | $ | 1,118 | ||||||
Interest
expense and commitment fees
|
(773 | ) | (1,713 | ) | (1,243 | ) | ||||||
Realized
and unrealized translation gains (losses), net
|
815 | 32 | (396 | ) | ||||||||
Gain
on sale of assets
|
1,703 | 299 | — | |||||||||
Impairment
of fixed assets
|
(95 | ) | (724 | ) | (250 | ) | ||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
247 | (466 | ) | (439 | ) | |||||||
$ | 3,340 | $ | (1,378 | ) | $ | (1,210 | ) |
8.
INCOME TAXES
|
Components
of income (loss) before income taxes (in
thousands):
|
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Domestic
operations
|
$ | 3,433 | $ | 5,069 | $ | (8,440 | ) | |||||
Foreign
operations
|
13,438 | 3,783 | 1,526 | |||||||||
$ | 16,871 | $ | 8,852 | $ | (6,914 | ) |
The
amount of domestic taxable income (loss) (in thousands) for fiscal 2008, 2007
and 2006 amounted to $5,879, $6,982 and $(5,803), respectively.
|
The
provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following (in
thousands):
|
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Current:
|
||||||||||||
Federal
|
$ | 488 | $ | (855 | ) | $ | — | |||||
Foreign
|
4,170 | 1,316 | 507 | |||||||||
State
|
161 | 92 | 175 | |||||||||
Deferred
|
1,221 | 1,646 | (3,814 | ) | ||||||||
$ | 6,040 | $ | 2,199 | $ | (3,132 | ) |
A
reconciliation of expected tax expense at the U.S. statutory rate to actual tax
expense is as follows (in thousands):
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Expected
tax expense (benefit)
|
$ | 5,736 | $ | 3,010 | $ | (2,351 | ) | |||||
Increase
(decrease) from:
|
||||||||||||
State
taxes, net of federal benefit
|
208 | 215 | (83 | ) | ||||||||
Foreign
taxes, net of federal credits
|
(270 | ) | (368 | ) | (1,217 | ) | ||||||
Change
in valuation allowance
|
(138 | ) | (942 | ) | 1,228 | |||||||
Return
to provision and tax reserve adjustments
|
246 | (247 | ) | (250 | ) | |||||||
Foreign
loss not benefited
|
— | 296 | — | |||||||||
Other
permanent items
|
258 | 235 | (459 | ) | ||||||||
Actual
tax expense (benefit)
|
$ | 6,040 | $ | 2,199 | $ | (3,132 | ) |
The tax
expense for fiscal 2007 was reduced by a net reduction in the valuation
allowance. This included a release of valuation allowance for foreign NOL’s
caused by an increase in taxable income in those countries and a release of
valuation allowance for state NOL’s also caused by a significant increase in
32
taxable
income in those states. This was offset by an increase in the valuation
allowance related to certain state tax credits.
The tax
expense for fiscal 2007 was also reduced by a reduction in tax reserves as a
result of the close of certain examination years, further analysis of transfer
pricing exposure, and the reduced likelihood of future assessment due to changes
in circumstances offset by return to provision adjustments from the fiscal 2006
tax returns.
No
valuation allowance has been recorded for the domestic federal NOL. The Company
believes that forecasted future taxable income and certain tax planning
opportunities eliminate the need for any valuation allowance.
The tax
benefit for fiscal 2006 was increased by a reduction in tax reserves as a result
of the close out of certain examination years and the reduced likelihood of
future assessment due to changes in circumstances.
Conversely,
a valuation allowance was provided in fiscal 2006 on state NOL’s as a result of
much shorter carryforward periods and the uncertainty of generating adequate
taxable income at the state level. Similarly, a valuation allowance has been
provided on foreign NOL’s and the uncertainty of generating future taxable
income. Lastly, a valuation allowance has been provided for foreign tax credit
carryforwards due to the uncertainty of generating sufficient foreign source
income in the future. The need for any valuation allowance on the domestic
federal NOL and the continued need for allowance on state and foreign NOL’s and
tax credits will be reevaluated periodically in the future as certain facts and
assumptions change over time.
The long
term-taxes payable on the balance sheet as of June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007
relate primarily to reserves for transfer pricing issues.
Deferred
income taxes at June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007 are attributable to the
following (in thousands):
2008
|
2007
(Restated)
|
|||||||
Deferred
assets (current):
|
||||||||
Inventories
|
$ | (4,399 | ) | $ | (2,882 | ) | ||
Employee
benefits (other than pension)
|
(234 | ) | (462 | ) | ||||
Book
reserves
|
(1,281 | ) | (310 | ) | ||||
Other
|
(82 | ) | (232 | ) | ||||
$ | (5,996 | ) | $ | (3,866 | ) | |||
Deferred
assets (long-term):
|
||||||||
Federal
NOL carried forward
|
$ | (2,501 | ) | $ | (4,131 | ) | ||
State
NOL various carryforward periods
|
(482 | ) | (567 | ) | ||||
Foreign
NOL carried forward indefinitely
|
(1,049 | ) | (1,203 | ) | ||||
Foreign
tax credit carryforward expiring 2009-11
|
(1,194 | ) | (1,194 | ) | ||||
Retiree
medical benefits
|
(4,241 | ) | (6,285 | ) | ||||
Other
|
(1,263 | ) | (1,769 | ) | ||||
$ | (10,730 | ) | $ | (15,149 | ) | |||
Valuation
reserve for state NOL, foreign NOL and foreign tax credits
|
$ | 1,995 | $ | 2,140 | ||||
Long-term
deferred assets
|
$ | (8,735 | ) | $ | (13,009 | ) | ||
Deferred
liabilities (current):
|
$ | 3 | $ | 9 | ||||
Misc
credits
|
$ | 3 | $ | 9 | ||||
33
Deferred
liabilities (long-term):
|
||||||||
Prepaid
pension
|
$ | 12,372 | $ | 15,956 | ||||
Depreciation
|
2,675 | 3,057 | ||||||
$ | 15,047 | $ | 19,013 | |||||
Net
deferred tax liability (asset)
|
$ | 319 | $ | 2,147 |
As of
June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007, the net long-term deferred tax liability on the
balance sheet is as follows:
2008
|
2007
(Restated)
|
|||||||
Long-term
liabilities
|
$ | 15,047 | $ | 19,013 | ||||
Long-term
assets
|
(8,735 | ) | (13,009 | ) | ||||
$ | 6,312 | $ | 6,004 |
|
Foreign
operations deferred assets (current) relate primarily to
pensions.
|
Foreign
operations net deferred assets (long-term) relate primarily to foreign NOL and
foreign tax credits carryforwards.
Amounts
related to foreign operations included in the long-term portion of deferred
liabilities relate primarily to depreciation.
The
Company adopted FASB Interpretation 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes” (“FIN No. 48”), at the beginning of fiscal year 2008. FIN No. 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an
enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting
for Income Taxes.” FIN No. 48 prescribes a two-step process to determine the
amount of tax benefit to be recognized. First, the tax position must be
evaluated to determine the likelihood that it will be sustained upon external
examination. If the tax position is deemed “more-likely-than-not” to be
sustained, the tax position is then assessed to determine the amount of benefit
to recognize in the financial statements. The amount of the benefit that may be
recognized is the largest amount that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood
of being realized upon ultimate settlement. As a result of implementing FIN No.
48, the Company recognized a cumulative effect adjustment of $.3 million to
decrease the July 1, 2007 retained earnings balance and increase long-term tax
payable. Also in connection with this implementation the Company has
reclassified $1.8 million of unrecognized tax benefits into a long-term taxes
receivable representing the corollary effect of transfer pricing competent
authority adjustments.
A
reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits
are as follows:
Balance
at July 1, 2007
|
$ | 6,964 | ||
Increases for tax positions
taken during a prior period
|
1,558 | |||
Increases for tax positions
taken during the current period
|
— | |||
Decreases relating to
settlements
|
— | |||
Decreases resulting from the
expiration of the statue of limitations
|
— | |||
Balance
at June 28, 2008
|
$ | 8,522 |
Of the
$8.5 million of unrecognized tax benefits as of June 28, 2008, $6.0 million
would impact the effective income tax rate if recognized. During the
next 12 months, the Company does not anticipate any significant changes to the
total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, other than the accrual of additional
interest expense in an amount similar to the prior year’s expense.
The
Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax and various state, local and
international income taxes in numerous jurisdictions. The Company’s domestic and
international tax liabilities are subject to the allocation of revenues and
expenses in different jurisdictions and the timing of recognizing revenues and
34
expenses.
Additionally, the amount of income taxes paid is subject to the Company’s
interpretation of applicable tax laws in the jurisdictions in which it
files.
The
Company has substantially concluded all U.S. federal income tax matters for
years through fiscal 2003. As of June 28, 2008, the Company did not have any
income tax audits in progress in the numerous states, local and international
jurisdictions in which the Company operates. In international jurisdictions
including Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, U.K., Germany, New
Zealand and Mexico, which comprise a significant portion of the Company’s
operations, the years that may be examined vary, with the earliest year being
2004 (except for Brazil, which has 1997-2007 still open for
examination).
The
Company recognizes interest expense related to income tax matters in income tax
expense. The Company has accrued $.1 million of interest as of July 1, 2007. The
amount did not change significantly during fiscal 2008.
The
federal NOL carryforward of $7.4 million expires in the years 2023, 2025, and
2026. The state NOL carryforwards of $.8 million expire at various times over
the next 5 years. The foreign tax credit carryforward of $1.2 million expire in
the years 2009 through 2016.
No
deferred taxes have been provided on the undistributed non-U.S. subsidiary
earnings that are considered to be permanently invested. At June 28, 2008, the
estimated amount of total unremitted earnings is $61 million.
9.
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT AND RETIREMENT PLANS
The
Company has several pension plans, both defined benefit and defined
contribution, covering all of its domestic and most of its nondomestic
employees. In addition, certain domestic employees participate in an Employee
Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP). The Company makes periodic contributions to the
ESOP in the form of Company stock or in cash to be invested in Company stock.
Employees are not required or permitted to make contributions to the ESOP.
Ninety percent of the actuarially determined annuity value of their ESOP shares
is used to offset benefits otherwise due under the domestic defined benefit
pension plan. The total cost (benefit) of all such plans for fiscal 2008, 2007
and 2006, considering the combined projected benefits and funds of the ESOP as
well as the other plans, was $(1,652), $64,000 and $1,176,000, respectively.
Included in these amounts are the Company’s contributions to the defined
contribution plan amounting to $622,000, $588,000 and $532,000 in fiscal 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively.
Under
both domestic and foreign defined benefit plans, benefits are based on years of
service and final average earnings. Plan assets, including those of the ESOP,
consist primarily of investment grade debt obligations, marketable equity
securities and shares of the Company’s common stock. The asset allocation of the
Company’s domestic pension plan is diversified, consisting primarily of
investments in equity and debt securities. The Company seeks a long-term
investment return that is reasonable given prevailing capital market
expectations. Target allocations are 50% to 70% in equities (including 10% to
20% in Company stock), and 30% to 50% in cash and debt securities.
The
Company uses an expected long-term rate of return assumption of 8.0% for the
domestic pension plan, and 7.2% for the nondomestic plan. In determining these
assumptions, the Company considers the historical returns and expectations for
future returns for each asset class as well as the target asset allocation of
the pension portfolio as a whole. The Company uses a discount rate assumption of
6.2% for the domestic plan and 5.6% for the U.K. plan. In determining these
assumptions, the Company considers published third party data appropriate for
the plans. The change from the prior year discount rate for the domestic plan
reflects the overall decline in comparable market rates for the applicable
measurement dates.
The table
below details assets by category for the Company’s domestic pension plan. These
assets consist primarily of publicly traded equity and fixed income securities,
including 987,704 shares of Company common stock with a fair value of
$21.3 million (20% of total plan assets) at June 28, 2008, and 965,219
35
shares of
the Company’s common stock with a fair value of $17.7 million (15% of total plan
assets) at June 30, 2007. The majority of these shares are in the Company’s ESOP
plan.
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Asset
category:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
1 | % | 1 | % | ||||
Equities
|
79 | % | 77 | % | ||||
Debt
|
20 | % | 22 | % | ||||
100 | % | 100 | % |
Effective
June 30, 2007, the Company adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans” (“FAS 158”). FAS 158
required the Company to recognize the funded status (i.e., the difference
between the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligations) of
its pension plans in the June 30, 2007 consolidated balance sheet, with a
corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax.
The adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss at adoption represents
the net losses, unrecognized prior service costs, and accumulated gains, all of
which were previously netted against the plan’s funded status in the Company’s
historical accounting policy for amortizing such amounts. Further, actuarial
gains and losses that arise in subsequent periods and are not recognized as net
periodic pension cost in the same periods will be recognized as a component of
other comprehensive income. Those amounts will be subsequently recognized as a
component of net periodic pension cost on the same basis as the amounts
recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss upon adoption of FAS
158.
The
incremental effects of adopting the provisions of FAS 158 on the Company’s
consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2007 are presented in the following
table. The adoption of FAS 158 had no effect on the Company’s consolidated
statement of operations for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 or for any prior
period presented, and it will not affect the Company’s operating results in
future periods. Had the Company not been required to adopt FAS 158 at June 30,
2007, it would have recognized an additional minimum liability pursuant to the
provisions of SFAS 87. The effect of recognizing the additional minimum
liability is included in the table below in the column labeled “Prior to
Adopting FAS 158.”
At
June 30, 2007
|
||||||||||||
Prior
to Adopting SFAS 158
|
Effect
of Adopting SFAS 158
|
As
Reported at June 30, 2007
|
||||||||||
Pension
asset
|
$ | 38,898 | $ | (2,242 | ) | $ | 36,656 | |||||
Postretirement
benefit liability
|
(16,044 | ) | 4,019 | (12,025 | ) | |||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(8,977 | ) | (694 | ) | (9,671 | ) | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
— | 1,083 | 1,083 | |||||||||
Total
assets
|
236,253 | (2,242 | ) | 234,011 | ||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
(59,343 | ) | 3,325 | (56,018 | ) | |||||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
(176,910 | ) | (1,083 | ) | (177,993 | ) |
Included
in accumulated other comprehensive gain at June 30, 2007 is $1.8 million ($1.1
million net tax) related to net unrecognized actuarial losses and unrecognized
prior service credit that have not yet been recognized in net periodic pension
or benefit cost for pensions and post-retirements. The Company recognized $.4
million in net actuarial losses and prior service credit in net periodic pension
and benefit cost during fiscal 2008.
36
Domestic
and U.K. Plans Combined:
|
The
status of these defined benefit plans, including the ESOP, is as follows
(in thousands):
|
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Change
in benefit obligation
|
||||||||||||
Benefit
obligation at beginning of year
|
$ | 120,850 | $ | 115,485 | $ | 122,758 | ||||||
Service
cost
|
2,375 | 2,727 | 3,518 | |||||||||
Interest
cost
|
6,980 | 6,807 | 6,482 | |||||||||
Participant
contributions
|
300 | 282 | 255 | |||||||||
Exchange
rate changes
|
11 | 2,242 | 1,140 | |||||||||
Benefits
paid
|
(5,287 | ) | (5,210 | ) | (4,862 | ) | ||||||
Actuarial
(gain) loss
|
(15,392 | ) | (1,484 | ) | (13,806 | ) | ||||||
Benefit
obligation at end of year
|
$ | 109,837 | $ | 120,849 | $ | 115,485 | ||||||
Weighted
average assumptions – benefit obligations (domestic)
|
||||||||||||
Discount
rate
|
6.75 | % | 6.20 | % | 6.20 | % | ||||||
Rate
of compensation increase
|
3.25 | % | 3.25 | % | 3.25 | % | ||||||
Cost
of living increase
|
2.50 | % | 2.50 | % | 2.50 | % | ||||||
Change
in plan assets
|
||||||||||||
Fair
value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
$ | 157,506 | $ | 138,044 | $ | 136,948 | ||||||
Actual
return on plan assets
|
(12,368 | ) | 21,700 | 4,102 | ||||||||
Employer
contributions
|
622 | 588 | 532 | |||||||||
Participant
contributions
|
300 | 282 | 255 | |||||||||
Benefits
paid
|
(5,287 | ) | (5,210 | ) | (4,862 | ) | ||||||
Exchange
rate changes
|
56 | 2,101 | 1,069 | |||||||||
Fair
value of plan assets at end of year
|
$ | 140,829 | $ | 157,505 | $ | 138,044 | ||||||
Funded
status at end of year
|
||||||||||||
Funded
status
|
$ | 30,992 | $ | 36,656 | $ | 22,559 | ||||||
Unrecognized
actuarial gain
|
N/A | N/A | 12,971 | |||||||||
Unrecognized
transition asset
|
N/A | N/A | — | |||||||||
Unrecognized
prior service cost
|
N/A | N/A | 2,536 | |||||||||
Net
amount recognized
|
$ | 30,992 | $ | 36,656 | $ | 38,066 | ||||||
Amounts
recognized in statement of financial position
|
||||||||||||
Noncurrent
assets
|
$ | 34,643 | $ | 36,656 | 34,551 | |||||||
Current
liability
|
(23 | ) | — | N/A | ||||||||
Non
current liability
|
(3,628 | ) | — | N/A | ||||||||
Net
amount recognized in statement of financial position
|
$ | 30,992 | $ | 36,656 | $ | 34,551 | ||||||
Weighted
average assumptions – net periodic benefit cost (domestic)
|
||||||||||||
Discount
rate
|
6.20 | % | 6.20 | % | 5.00 | % | ||||||
Cost
of living increase
|
2.50 | % | 2.50 | % | 2.50 | % | ||||||
Rate
of compensation increase
|
3.25 | % | 3.25 | % | 3.25 | % | ||||||
Return
on Plan Assets
|
8.00 | % | 8.00 | % | 8.00 | % | ||||||
37
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Amounts
not yet reflected in net periodic benefit cost and
included
in accumulated other comprehensive income
|
||||||||||||
Transition
asset (obligation)
|
$ | — | $ | — | N/A | |||||||
Prior
service credit (cost)
|
(1,684 | ) | (2,127 | ) | N/A | |||||||
Accumulated
gain (loss)
|
(8,836 | ) | (115 | ) | N/A | |||||||
Amounts
not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit
cost
|
(10,520 | ) | (2,242 | ) | N/A | |||||||
Accumulated
contributions in excess of net periodic benefit cost
|
$ | 41,512 | $ | 38,898 | N/A | |||||||
Net
amount recognized
|
$ | 30,992 | $ | 36,656 | N/A | |||||||
Net
increase/(decrease) in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) due
to FAS 158
|
$ | — | $ | (2,242 | ) | N/A | ||||||
Components
of net periodic (benefit) cost (Domestic and U.K.)
|
||||||||||||
Service
cost
|
$ | 2,375 | $ | 2,728 | $ | 3,518 | ||||||
Interest
cost
|
6,980 | 6,807 | 6,482 | |||||||||
Expected
return on plan assets
|
(11,789 | ) | (10,377 | ) | (10,439 | ) | ||||||
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
446 | 439 | 425 | |||||||||
Amortization
of transitional (asset) or obligation
|
— | — | (2 | ) | ||||||||
Recognized
actuarial (gain) or loss
|
(7 | ) | 152 | 318 | ||||||||
Net
periodic (benefit) cost
|
$ | (1,995 | ) | $ | (251 | ) | $ | 302 | ||||
Estimated
amounts that will be amortized from accumulated
other
comprehensive income over the next year
|
||||||||||||
Initial
net obligation(asset)
|
$ | — | $ | — | N/A | |||||||
Prior
service cost
|
(443 | ) | (443 | ) | N/A | |||||||
Net
gain (loss)
|
11 | 6 | N/A | |||||||||
Additional
disclosure for all pension plans
|
||||||||||||
Accumulated
benefit obligation
|
$ | 103,340 | $ | 113,633 | $ | 106,269 | ||||||
Information
for pension plans with projected benefit
obligation
in excess of plan assets
|
||||||||||||
Projected
benefit obligation
|
$ | 41,040 | $ | 40,150 | $ | 38,797 | ||||||
Fair
value of plan assets
|
$ | 37,389 | $ | 40,067 | $ | 33,868 | ||||||
Information
for pension plans with accumulated benefits
in
excess of plan assets
|
||||||||||||
Projected
benefit obligation
|
41,040 | 523 | 38,797 | |||||||||
Accumulated
benefit obligation
|
40,897 | 469 | 38,439 | |||||||||
Fair
value of assets
|
37,389 | N/A | 33,868 |
38
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Underfunded
Plans (Primarily U.K.):
|
||||||||||||
Year-end
information for plans with accumulated benefit
obligations
in excess of plan assets (primarily U.K.)
|
||||||||||||
Projected
benefit obligation
|
$ | 40,527 | $ | 40,150 | $ | 38,797 | ||||||
Accumulated
benefit obligation
|
40,466 | 39,905 | 38,439 | |||||||||
Fair
value of plan assets
|
37,389 | 40,067 | 33,868 | |||||||||
Weighted
average assumptions – benefit obligations (U.K.)
|
||||||||||||
Discount
rate
|
6.30 | % | 5.60 | % | 5.10 | % | ||||||
Rate
of compensation increase
|
3.70 | % | 3.30 | % | 3.60 | % | ||||||
Cost
of living increase
|
3.70 | % | 2.80 | % | 2.60 | % | ||||||
Components
of net periodic benefit cost (benefit)
|
||||||||||||
Service
cost
|
$ | 557 | $ | 650 | $ | 3,518 | ||||||
Interest
cost
|
2,235 | 1,970 | 6,482 | |||||||||
Expected
return on plan assets
|
(2,551 | ) | (2,186 | ) | (10,439 | ) | ||||||
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
173 | 166 | 425 | |||||||||
Amortization
of transition asset
|
— | — | (2 | ) | ||||||||
Recognized
actuarial gain
|
— | 156 | 317 | |||||||||
Net
periodic benefit cost
|
$ | 414 | $ | 756 | $ | 301 | ||||||
Weighted
average assumptions – net periodic benefit cost (U.K.)
|
||||||||||||
Discount
rate
|
5.60 | % | 5.10 | % | 5.20 | % | ||||||
Expected
long-term rate of return
|
7.20 | % | 6.90 | % | 6.70 | % | ||||||
Rate
of compensation increase
|
3.30 | % | 3.00 | % | 3.50 | % | ||||||
Medical
and Life Insurance Benefits – Retired Employees:
|
||||||||||||
The
Company provides certain medical and life insurance
benefits
for most retired employees in the United States.
The
status of these plans at year end is as follows (in
thousands):
|
||||||||||||
Change
in benefit obligation
|
||||||||||||
Benefit
obligation at beginning of year
|
$ | 12,025 | $ | 12,694 | $ | 16,929 | ||||||
Service
cost
|
393 | 380 | 517 | |||||||||
Interest
cost
|
742 | 728 | 750 | |||||||||
Plan
amendments
|
— | (1,409 | ) | (3,017 | ) | |||||||
Benefits
paid
|
(1,062 | ) | (1,011 | ) | (1,055 | ) | ||||||
Actuarial
(gain) loss
|
(1,255 | ) | 643 | (1,430 | ) | |||||||
Benefit
obligation at end of year
|
$ | 10,843 | $ | 12,025 | $ | 12,694 | ||||||
Weighted
average assumptions – benefit obligations
|
||||||||||||
Discount
rate
|
6.75 | % | 6.20 | % | 6.20 | % | ||||||
Rate
of compensation increase
|
3.25 | % | 3.25 | % | 3.25 | % | ||||||
Cost
of living increase
|
3.20 | % | 2.50 | % | 2.50 | % | ||||||
Change
in plan assets
|
||||||||||||
Fair
value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Actual
return on plan assets
|
— | — | — | |||||||||
Employer
contributions
|
1,062 | 1,011 | (1,055 | ) | ||||||||
Participant
contributions
|
— | — | — | |||||||||
Benefits
paid
|
(1,062 | ) | (1,011 | ) | 1,055 | |||||||
Exchange
rate changes
|
— | — | — | |||||||||
Fair
value of plan assets at end of year
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — |
39
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Funded
status at end of year
|
$ | (10,843 | ) | $ | (12,025 | ) | $ | (12,694 | ) | |||
Unrecognized
actuarial gain
|
N/A | N/A | 1,853 | |||||||||
Unrecognized
transition asset
|
N/A | N/A | — | |||||||||
Unrecognized
prior service cost
|
N/A | N/A | (5,899 | ) | ||||||||
Net
amount recognized at year-end
|
$ | (10,843 | ) | $ | (12,025 | ) | $ | (16,740 | ) | |||
Less
current liability
|
— | — | 729 | |||||||||
Net
amount recognized in statement of financial position
|
$ | (10,843 | ) | $ | (12,025 | ) | $ | (16,011 | ) | |||
Amounts
recognized in statement of financial position
|
||||||||||||
Prepaid
benefit cost
|
$ | — | $ | — | N/A | |||||||
Current
post-retirement benefit liability
|
(696 | ) | (784 | ) | N/A | |||||||
Post-retirement
benefit liability
|
(10,147 | ) | (11,241 | ) | N/A | |||||||
Net
amount recognized in statement of financial position
|
$ | (10,843 | ) | $ | (12,025 | ) | N/A | |||||
Weighted
average assumptions – net periodic benefit cost
|
||||||||||||
Discount
rate
|
6.75 | % | 6.20 | % | 5.00 | % | ||||||
Rate
of compensation increase
|
3.25 | % | 3.25 | % | 3.25 | % | ||||||
Cost
of living increase
|
2.50 | % | 2.50 | % | 2.50 | % | ||||||
Amounts
not yet reflected in net periodic benefit cost and included in accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
||||||||||||
Transition
asset (obligation)
|
$ | — | $ | — | N/A | |||||||
Prior
service credit (cost)
|
5,509 | 6,414 | N/A | |||||||||
Accumulated
gain (loss)
|
(1,027 | ) | (2,395 | ) | N/A | |||||||
Amounts
not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit
cost
|
4,482 | 4,019 | N/A | |||||||||
Net
periodic benefit cost in excess of accumulated
contributions
|
$ | (15,325 | ) | $ | (16,044 | ) | N/A | |||||
Net
amount recognized
|
$ | (10,843 | ) | $ | (12,025 | ) | N/A |
A 10%
annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits
was assumed for fiscal 2008. The rate was assumed to decrease gradually to 5.0%
for 2016 and remain at that level thereafter. Plan amendments for retired
employees relate to reductions in the Company’s contributions.
Assumed
health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported
for the health care plans. A one percentage point change in assumed health care
cost trend rates would have the following effects (in thousands):
1%
Increase
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Effect
on total of service and interest cost
|
$ | 126 | $ | 124 | $ | 86 | ||||||
Effect
on postretirement benefit obligation
|
1,001 | 1,159 | 1,312 |
1%
Decrease
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Effect
on total of service and interest cost
|
$ | (106 | ) | $ | (104 | ) | $ | (72 | ) | |||
Effect
on postretirement benefit obligation
|
(858 | ) | (988 | ) | (1,110 | ) |
For
fiscal 2009, the Company expects no contributions (required or discretionary) to
the qualified domestic pension plan, $23,000 to the nonqualified domestic
pension plan, $574,000 to the nondomestic pension plan, and $696,000 to the
retiree medical and life insurance plan.
40
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Components
of net periodic benefit cost (benefit)
|
||||||||||||
Service
cost
|
$ | 393 | $ | 380 | $ | 517 | ||||||
Interest
cost
|
742 | 728 | 750 | |||||||||
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
(905 | ) | (894 | ) | (619 | ) | ||||||
Recognized
actuarial gain
|
113 | 101 | 132 | |||||||||
Net
periodic benefit cost
|
$ | 343 | $ | 315 | $ | 780 |
Future
pension and other benefit payments are as follows:
Fiscal
year
|
Pension
|
Other
Benefits
|
||||||
2009
|
$ | 5,639 | $ | 696 | ||||
2010
|
5,797 | 768 | ||||||
2011
|
5,932 | 788 | ||||||
2012
|
6,076 | 784 | ||||||
2013
|
6,247 | 786 | ||||||
2014-2018
|
36,273 | 4,436 |
In
December 2003, legislation was enacted providing a Medicare prescription drug
benefit beginning in 2006 and federal subsidies to employers who provide drug
coverage to retirees. Although the Company has experienced some savings, this
legislation has not materially impacted plan obligations.
10.
DEBT
Effective
April 28, 2006, the Company entered into a credit facility agreement with Bank
of America comprised of a $10 million revolving credit facility (Revolver), a $3
million sub-limit under the Revolver for the issuance of letters of credit, and
a $12 million reducing revolving (Reducing Revolver) credit facility. The
agreement was then amended effective June 24, 2006. The Revolver requires a
commitment fee of .25%. Interest rates on all the above facilities vary from
LIBOR plus 1.25% to LIBOR plus 2.0% depending on funded debt to earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) ratio, as defined in the
credit facility. On April 28, 2006, the Company borrowed $12 million under the
Reducing Revolver to finance the Tru-Stone acquisition previously described. The
actual interest rate at June 28, 2008 for the Reducing Revolver is 6.94%, which
includes the cost of the interest rate swap described below. The Reducing
Revolver shall reduce by one fifth of the original principal amount at the end
of each year until fully repaid. The Company’s Tru-Stone subsidiary maintains a
$500,000 line of credit for which no commitment fees are required.
At year
end, long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Reducing
Revolver
|
$ | 7,200 | $ | 9,600 | ||||
Capitalized
lease obligations payable in Brazilian currency, due 2009 to 2011, 17% to
25%
|
1,569 | 1,768 | ||||||
8,769 | 11,368 | |||||||
Less
current maturities
|
2,935 | 2,848 | ||||||
$ | 5,834 | $ | 8,520 |
Included
in Notes Payable and Current Maturities at June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007 is
$.5 and $.2 million, respectively, of short-term financing collateralizing a
portion of the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary receivables. Also included in
Notes Payable and Current Maturities is short-term financing of the Company’s
Brazilian subsidiary amounting to $1.3 million at year end.
41
Under the
credit facility, as amended, the Company must maintain tangible net worth of
$130 million and an EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement) to debt service
ratio 1.25 for each quarter. Also, the Company is required to maintain a minimum
consolidated cash and investments balance of $15 million. The Company has issued
$1.0 million of standby letters of credit under this agreement that guarantee
future payments which may be required under certain insurance programs. As of
June 28, 2008, the Company was in compliance with all debt
covenants.
The
Company has entered into an interest rate swap agreement designed to limit the
amount of exposure resulting from increases in its variable LIBOR rate on the
$12 million Reducing Revolver currently outstanding. The swap agreement covers
$6 million of the $12 million outstanding for the first 3 years of the 5 year
term of the debt. The agreement acts as a cash flow hedge which requires cash
payment when the LIBOR rate is below 7.19% and provides cash receipts when the
LIBOR rates exceed 7.19%. As of June 28, 2008 the swap agreement has an
immaterial value. In the event that the LIBOR rate continues to increase, a fair
value will be assigned to the swap agreement and the gain will be taken into
Other Comprehensive Income.
Current
notes payable representing current portion of the Reducing Revolver and capital
lease obligations carry interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 1% to LIBOR plus 4%.
Interest expense, prior to capitalization of interest on self-constructed
assets, was $1.0 million, $1.7 million and $1.2 million in fiscal 2008, 2007 and
2006. Long-term debt maturities from 2009 to 2011 are as follows: $2.9 million,
$2.9 million and $2.8 million. On June 29, 2007, the Company borrowed $1.0
million under the Revolver.
The
Company provides guarantees of debt for its Brazilian and Scottish subsidiaries
of up to $6.0 million and $1.8 million, respectively. Outstanding debt covered
by these guarantees is reflected on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as
of June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007. The Company’s Brazilian subsidiary has also
pledged $.5 and $.8 million of trade receivables as collateral for a short-term
loan at the year ended June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007. These receivables are
included in the Company’s Accounts Receivable balance as of June 28, 2008 and
June 30, 2007.
11.
COMMON STOCK
Class B
common stock is identical to Class A except that it has 10 votes per share, is
generally nontransferable except to lineal descendants, cannot receive more
dividends than Class A, and can be converted to Class A at any time. Class A
common stock is entitled to elect 25% of the directors to be elected at each
meeting with the remaining 75% being elected by Class A and Class B voting
together. In addition, the Company has a stockholder rights plan to protect
stockholders from attempts to acquire the Company on unfavorable terms not
approved by the Board of Directors. Under certain circumstances, the plan
entitles the holder of each Class A or Class B share to additional shares of the
Company or an acquiring company, as defined, at a 50% discount to market.
Generally, the rights will be exercisable if a person or group acquires 15% or
more of the Company’s outstanding shares. The rights trade together with the
underlying common stock. They can be redeemed by the Company for $.01 per right
and expire in 2010. As of June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007, the Company
held 1,745,662 and 1,749,532, respectively, of treasury
shares.
Under the
Company’s employee stock purchase plans (ESPP), the purchase price of the
optioned stock is 85% of the lower of the market price on the date the option is
granted or the date it is exercised. Options become exercisable exactly two
years from the date of grant and expire if not exercised. Therefore, no options
were exercisable at fiscal year ends. A summary of option activity is as
follows:
42
Shares
On Option
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price At Grant
|
Shares
Available
For Grant
|
||||||||||
Balance,
June 25, 2005
|
38,238 | 14.57 | 723,926 | |||||||||
Options
granted ($15.60 and $11.69)
|
42,405 | 13.39 | (42,405 | ) | ||||||||
Options
exercised ($12.07 and $11.64)
|
(9,319 | ) | 11.77 | |||||||||
Options
canceled
|
(23,249 | ) | — | 23,249 | ||||||||
Balance,
June 24, 2006
|
48,075 | 13.50 | 704,770 | |||||||||
Options
granted ($13.26 and $13.61)
|
27,887 | 13.41 | (27,887 | ) | ||||||||
Options
exercised ($13.27 and $13.26)
|
(7,747 | ) | 13.26 | |||||||||
Options
canceled
|
(27,125 | ) | — | 27,125 | ||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2007
|
41,090 | 13.24 | 704,008 | |||||||||
Options
granted ($15.98 and $19.64)
|
25,415 | 17.83 | (25,415 | ) | ||||||||
Options
exercised ($15.60 and $11.69)
|
(15,520 | ) | 13.52 | |||||||||
Options
canceled
|
(16,746 | ) | — | 16,746 | ||||||||
Balance,
June 28, 2008
|
34,239 | 15.74 | 695,339 |
The
following information relates to outstanding options as of June 28,
2008:
Weighted
average remaining life
|
1.2 years
|
|||
Weighted
average fair value on grant date of options granted in:
|
||||
2006
|
3.72 | |||
2007
|
4.22 | |||
2008
|
6.04 |
The fair
value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions: expected volatility - 34% - 56%, interest - 3.1% to 5.2%, and
expected lives - 2 years.
In
December 2004, the FASB issued FAS 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which requires
companies to measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based
payments at fair value. The Company adopted FAS 123(R) at the beginning of
fiscal 2006 using the modified prospective method. As a result, compensation
expense of $47,800, $60,500 and $62,000 has been recorded for fiscal 2008, 2007
and 2006, respectively. It is not anticipated that future compensation expense
related to FAS 123(R) will vary materially from this amount under the current
employee stock purchase plan.
12.
CONTINGENCIES
The
Company is involved in some matters which arise in the normal course of
business, which are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s
financial statements.
13.
OPERATING DATA
The
Company believes it has no significant concentration of credit risk as of June
28, 2008. Trade receivables are dispersed among a large number of retailers,
distributors and industrial accounts in many countries.
The
Company is engaged in the single business segment of producing and marketing
industrial, professional and consumer products. It manufactures over 5,000
items, including precision measuring tools, tape measures, gages and saw blades.
Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which
separate discrete financial information is used by the chief operating decision
maker in determining how to allocate assets and assess performance of the
Company.
The
Company’s operations are primarily in North America, Brazil and the United
Kingdom. Geographic information about the Company’s sales and long-lived assets
are as follows (in thousands):
43
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Sales
|
||||||||||||
United
States
|
$ | 124,427 | $ | 124,436 | $ | 114,118 | ||||||
North
America (other than U.S.)
|
13,028 | 11,800 | 10,937 | |||||||||
United
Kingdom
|
37,674 | 35,397 | 31,552 | |||||||||
Brazil
|
73,118 | 57,709 | 55,187 | |||||||||
Eliminations
and other
|
(5,876 | ) | (6,986 | ) | (10,878 | ) | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 242,371 | $ | 222,356 | $ | 200,916 | ||||||
Long-lived
Assets
|
||||||||||||
United
States
|
$ | 87,224 | $ | 84,703 | $ | 89,660 | ||||||
North
America (other than U.S.)
|
516 | 398 | 386 | |||||||||
United
Kingdom
|
4,495 | 5,403 | 6,264 | |||||||||
Brazil
|
16,975 | 15,744 | 13,764 | |||||||||
Other
and eliminations
|
2,439 | 2,135 | 2,138 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 111,649 | $ | 108,383 | $ | 112,212 |
QUARTERLY
FINANCIAL DATA (unaudited)
(in
thousands except per share data)
Quarter
Ended
|
Net
Sales
|
Gross
Profit
|
Earnings
Before
Income
Taxes
|
Net
Earnings
|
Basic
Earnings
Per
Share
|
|||||||||||||||
Sep.
2006
|
$ | 51,092 | $ | 13,568 | $ | 295 | $ | 221 | $ | 0.03 | ||||||||||
Dec.
2006
|
57,110 | 16,306 | 1,795 | 1,242 | 0.19 | |||||||||||||||
Mar.
2007
|
54,448 | 16,119 | 1,877 | 1,314 | 0.20 | |||||||||||||||
Jun.
2007
|
59,706 | 19,833 | 4,885 | 3,876 | 0.58 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 222,356 | $ | 65,826 | $ | 8,852 | $ | 6,653 | $ | 1.00 | |||||||||||
Sep.
2007
|
$ | 59,550 | $ | 18,554 | $ | 3,585 | $ | 2,330 | $ | 0.35 | ||||||||||
Dec.
2007
|
62,437 | 19,545 | 5,940 | 3,423 | 0.52 | |||||||||||||||
Mar.
2008
|
60,101 | 19,060 | 4,977 | 2,861 | 0.43 | |||||||||||||||
Jun.
2008
|
60,283 | 19,079 | 2,369 | 2,217 | 0.34 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 242,371 | $ | 76,238 | $ | 16,871 | $ | 10,831 | $ | 1.64 |
The
Company’s Class A common stock is traded on the New York Stock
Exchange.
Item 9 - Changes in and
Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
Not
applicable.
Item 9A - Controls and
Procedures
Pursuant
to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we carried out an
evaluation, with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this
annual report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of such date in ensuring that information required to be filed in
this annual report was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time period required by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
44
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 identified in connection with our Chief
Executive Officer’s and Chief Financial Officer’s evaluation that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management
of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Internal control
over financial reporting includes those written policies and procedures
that:
•
|
Pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and
fairly reflect the transactions and acquisitions and dispositions of the
assets of the Company;
|
•
|
Provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of
America;
|
•
|
Provide
reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures of the Company are
being made only in accordance with authorization of management and
directors of the Company; and
|
•
|
Provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a
material effect on the consolidated financial
statements.
|
Internal
control over financial reporting includes the controls themselves, monitoring
and internal auditing practices and actions taken to correct deficiencies as
identified.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect all misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management
assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting as of June 28, 2008. Management based this assessment on criteria for
effective internal control over financial reporting described in “Internal
Control – Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management’s assessment included an
evaluation of the design of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of its internal control
over financial reporting. Management reviewed the results of its assessment with
the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Based on this assessment,
management determined that, as of June 28, 2008, the Company has maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting.
45
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Board of Directors and Stockholders of
The L.S.
Starrett Company
We have
audited The L.S. Starrett Company and subsidiaries’ (the “Company”) internal
control over financial reporting as of June 28, 2008, based on criteria
established in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control
over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our
audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based
on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A
company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of
the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management
and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our
opinion, The L.S. Starrett Company and subsidiaries maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
June 28, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated
Framework issued by COSO.
We also
have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company
as of June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 28, 2008
and our report dated September 11, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on
those financial statements and contained explanatory paragraphs related to the
adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board No. 158, "Employers' Accounting
for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post Retirement Plans”, as of June 30,
2007, the adoption of FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 as of July 1, 2007
and the restatement of an error.
/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP
Boston,
Massachusetts
September
11, 2008
46
Item 9B - Other
Information
None.
PART III
Item 10 – Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Directors
The
information concerning the Directors of the Registrant is contained immediately
under the heading “Election of Directors” and prior to Section A of Part I in
the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to be held on October 8, 2008 (the “2008 Proxy Statement”), which will be mailed
to stockholders on or about September 11, 2008. The information in that portion
of the 2008 Proxy Statement is hereby incorporated by reference.
Executive Officers of the
Registrant
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Held Present
Office
Since
|
|
Position
|
Douglas
A. Starrett
|
|
56
|
|
2001
|
|
President and CEO and Director
|
Randall
J. Hylek
|
|
53
|
|
2005
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
Anthony
M. Aspin
|
|
55
|
|
2000
|
|
Vice
President Sales
|
Stephen
F. Walsh
|
|
62
|
|
2003
|
|
Senior Vice President Operations and Director
|
Douglas
A. Starrett has been President of the Company since 1995 and became CEO in
2001.
From 2002
until he joined the company in 2005, Mr. Hylek served as interim Vice President,
Finance of Cooper Wiring Devices, a manufacturer of electrical wiring products,
a transitional Finance Manager at MCI (formerly World Com), and as an outside
consultant for Sarbanes-Oxley implementation at various medium and large public
companies. From 1999 to 2002 he was Vice President Finance for CTC
Communications, a telecommunications provider.
Anthony
M. Aspin was previously a divisional sales manager with the
Company.
Stephen
F. Walsh was previously President of the Silicon Carbide Division of
Saint-Gobain Industrial Ceramics before joining the Company in 2003 as Vice
President Operations.
The
positions listed above represent their principal occupations and employment
during the last five years.
The
President and Treasurer hold office until the first meeting of the directors
following the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective
successors are chosen and qualified, and each other officer holds office until
the first meeting of directors following the next annual meeting of
stockholders, unless a shorter period shall have been specified by the terms of
his election or appointment or, in each case, until he sooner dies, resigns, is
removed or becomes disqualified.
There
have been no events under any bankruptcy act, no criminal proceedings and no
judgments or injunctions material to the evaluation of the ability and integrity
of any executive officer during the past five years.
Code of
Ethics
The
Company has adopted a Policy on Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Ethics
Policy”) applicable to all directors, officers and employees of the Company. The
Code is intended to promote honest and ethical conduct, full and accurate
reporting, and compliance with laws as well as other matters. The Ethics Policy
is available on the Company’s website at www.starrett.com. Stockholders may also
obtain free of charge a printed copy of the Ethics Policy by writing to the
Clerk of the Company at The L.S. Starrett, 121 Crescent Street, Athol, MA 01331.
We intend to disclose any future amendments to, or waivers from, the Ethics
Policy within four business days of the waiver or amendment through a website
posting or by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
47
Item 11 - Executive
Compensation
The
information concerning management remuneration is contained in (i) General
Information Relating to the Board of Directors and Its Committees, and (ii) in
Sections C-H of Part I in the Company’s 2008 Proxy Statement, and is hereby
incorporated by reference.
Item 12 - Security Ownership
of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
(a) The
following table gives information about the Company’s common stock that may be
issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under the Company’s
2007 Employees’ Stock Purchase Plan (“2007 Plan”) as of June 28, 2008. The 2007
Plan was approved by stockholders at the Company’s 2007 annual meeting and
shares of Class A or Class B common stock may be issued under the 2007 Plan.
Options are not issued under the Company’s Employees’ Stock Purchase Plan that
was adopted in 1952.
Plan
Category
|
Number
of Securities
to
be issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and Rights
(a)
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants
and Rights
(b)
|
Number
of Securities
Remaining
Available
For
Future Issuance
Under
Equity Compen-
sation
Plans (Ex-
cluding
Securities
Reflected
in Column (a)
(c)
|
|||||||||
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders
|
34,239 | 15.74 | 695,339 | |||||||||
Equity
compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
— | — | — | |||||||||
Total
|
34,239 | 15.74 | 695,339 |
(b) Security
ownership of certain beneficial owners:
The
information concerning a more than 5% holder of any class of the Company’s
voting shares will be contained under the heading “Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners” in Section I of Part I of the Company’s 2008 Proxy Statement,
and is hereby incorporated by reference.
(c) Security
ownership of management:
The
information concerning the beneficial ownership of each class of equity
securities by all directors, and all directors and officers of the Company as a
group, is contained under the heading “Security Ownership of Management” in
Section I of Part I in the Company’s 2008 Proxy Statement. These portions of the
Proxy Statement are hereby incorporated by reference.
(d) The
Company knows of no arrangements that may, at a subsequent date, result in a
change in control of the Company.
Item 13 - Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
The
information required by this item is contained in the Company’s 2008 Proxy
Statement, and is hereby incorporated by reference.
Item 14 - Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
The
information required by this Item 14 will be contained in the Audit Fee table in
Section B of Part I in the Company’s 2008 Proxy Statement. These portions of the
Proxy Statement are hereby incorporated by reference.
48
PART IV
Item 15 – Exhibits and
Financial Statement Schedules
(a) 1.
Financial statements filed in Item 8 of this annual report:
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for each of the three years in the period ended June
28, 2008
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended June
28, 2008
Consolidated
Balance Sheets at June 28, 2008 and June 30, 2007
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for each of the three years in the period
ended June 28, 2008
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
2. The following consolidated financial
statement schedule of the Company included in this annual report on Form 10-K is
filed herewith pursuant to Item 15(c) and appears immediately before the Exhibit
Index:
SCHEDULE
II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
All other
financial statements and schedules are omitted because they are inapplicable,
not required under the instructions, or the information is reflected in the
financial statements or notes thereto.
3. See Exhibit Index below.
Compensatory plans or arrangements are identified by an “*.”
(b) See
Exhibit Index below.
(c) Not
applicable.
49
|
Schedule
II
|
|
The
L.S. Starrett Company
|
|
Valuation
and Qualifying Accounts
|
|
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
|
(in
000)
|
Balance
at Beginning of Period
|
Provisions
|
Charges
to Other Accounts
|
Write-offs
(1)
|
Balance
at End of Period
|
|||||||||||||||
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Year
Ended June 28, 2008
|
$ | 1,623 | $ | 461 | $ | 18 | $ | (1,401 | ) | $ | 701 | |||||||||
Year
Ended June 30, 2007
|
1,416 | 370 | (7 | ) | (156 | ) | 1,623 | |||||||||||||
Year
Ended June 24, 2006
|
1,125 | 596 | 51 | (357 | ) | 1,416 |
|
(1) Represents
accounts written off during the
year.
|
THE L.S. STARRETT COMPANY
AND SUBSIDIARIES - EXHIBIT INDEX
|
Exhibit
|
2.1*
|
Asset
Purchase Agreement dated as of April 28, 2006 by and among Starrett
Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Tru-Stone Technologies,
Inc., a Minnesota corporation (the “Company”), St. Cloud and each
individual shareholder of St. Cloud that signed the Asset Purchase
Agreement filed with Form 8-K dated May 8, 2006 is hereby incorporated by
reference.
|
3a
|
Restated
Articles of Organization dated December 20, 1989, filed with Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended December 23, 1989, are hereby incorporated by
reference.
|
3b
|
Bylaws
as amended September 16, 1999, filed with Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 24, 1999, are hereby incorporated by
reference.
|
4
|
Second
Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2002, between
the Company and Mellon Investor Services, as Rights Agent, including Form
of Common Stock Purchase Rights Certificate, filed with Form 10-K for the
year ended June 29, 2002, is hereby incorporated by
reference.
|
10a*
|
Form
of indemnification agreement with directors and executive officers, filed
with Form 10-K for the year ended June 29, 2002, is hereby incorporated by
reference.
|
10b*
|
The
L.S. Starrett Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, filed with
Form 10-K for the year ended June 29, 2002 is hereby incorporated by
reference.
|
10c*
|
The
L.S. Starrett Company 401(k) Stock Savings Plan (2001 Restatement), filed
with Form 10-K for the year ended June 29, 2002 is hereby incorporated by
reference.
|
10d*
|
2002
Employees’ Stock Purchase Plan filed with Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 28, 2002 is hereby incorporated by
reference.
|
10e*
|
Amendment
dated April 1, 2003 to the Company’s 401(k) Stock Savings Plan, filed with
Form 10-K for the year ended June 28, 2003, is hereby incorporated by
reference.
|
10f*
|
Amendment
dated October 20, 2003 to the Company’s 401(k) Stock Savings Plan, filed
with Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 27, 2003, is hereby
incorporated by reference.
|
10g
|
Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of April 28, 2006 by and among The
L.S. Starrett Company, a Massachusetts corporation, the Lenders from time
to time party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A. (“Bank of America”), as
Agent, a national banking association. The Credit Agreement filed with
Form 8-K dated May 8, 2006 is hereby incorporated by
reference.
|
10h
|
Amendment
dated as of June 24, 2006 to the Company’s Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement, filed with Form 10-K for the year ended June 24, 2006, is
hereby incorporated by reference.
|
50
10i*
|
2007
Employees’ Stock Purchase Plan filed with the Definitive Proxy Statement
for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is hereby incorporated by
reference.
|
10j*
|
Cash
Bonus Plan for Executive Officers of the Company, filed
herewith.
|
10k*
|
Cash
Bonus Plan for Anthony M. Aspin, filed
herewith.
|
11
|
Earnings
per share (not considered necessary – no difference in basic and diluted
per share amounts).
|
21
|
Subsidiaries
of the Registrant, filed herewith.
|
23
|
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, filed
herewith.
|
31a
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), filed
herewith.
|
31b
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), filed
herewith.
|
32
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b) and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code),
filed herewith.
|
99.1
|
The
audited financial statements of Tru-Stone for the years ended December 31,
2005 and December 31, 2004, and the unaudited financial statements for the
quarters ended March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2005 filed with Form 8-K/A
(Amendment I) dated July 13, 2006, is hereby incorporated by
reference.
|
99.2
|
The
unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet of the Company and Tru- Stone
as of March 25, 2006 and the unaudited pro forma combined statement of
operations of the Company and Tru-Stone for the year ended June 25, 2005
and the nine months ended March 25, 2006 filed with Form 8-K/A (Amendment
I) dated July 13, 2006, is hereby incorporated by
reference.
|
51
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
THE
L.S. STARRETT COMPANY
|
||
(Registrant)
|
||
By
|
/S/
RANDALL J. HYLEK
|
|
Randall
J. Hylek,
|
||
Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Date:
September 11, 2008
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the
capacities and on the date indicated:
DOUGLAS
A. STARRETT
|
SALVADOR
DE CAMARGO, JR.
|
|||
Douglas
A. Starrett, Sept. 11, 2008
|
Salvador
de Camargo, Jr., Sept. 11, 2008
|
|||
President
and CEO and Director
|
President
Starrett Industria e Comercio, Ltda, Brazil
|
|||
RALPH
G. LAWRENCE
|
TERRY
A. PIPER
|
|||
Ralph
G. Lawrence, Sept. 11, 2008
|
Terry
A. Piper, Sept. 11, 2008
|
|||
Director
|
Director
|
|||
RICHARD
B. KENNEDY
|
ROBERT
L. MONTGOMERY, JR.
|
|||
Richard
B. Kennedy, Sept. 11, 2008
|
Robert
L. Montgomery, Jr., Sept. 11, 2008
|
|||
Director
|
Director
|
|||
ROBERT
J. SIMKEVICH
|
STEPHEN
F. WALSH
|
|||
Robert
J. Simkevich, Sept. 11, 2008
|
Stephen
F. Walsh, Sept. 11, 2008
|
|||
Corporate
Controller
|
Senior
Vice President Operations and
Director
|
52