STARRETT L S CO - Quarter Report: 2009 November (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D. C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
||||||||||
x |
For
the quarterly period ended
|
September
26, 2009
|
||||||||
OR
|
||||||||||
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
||||||||||
o |
For
the transition period from
|
to
|
||||||||
Commission
file number
|
1-367
|
|||||||||
THE
L. S. STARRETT COMPANY
|
||||||||||
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
||||||||||
MASSACHUSETTS
|
04-1866480
|
|||||||||
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|||||||||
121
CRESCENT STREET, ATHOL, MASSACHUSETTS
|
01331-1915
|
|||||||||
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
|||||||||
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code
|
978-249-3551
|
|||||||||
Former
name, address and fiscal year, if changed since last
report
|
||||||||||
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
|
||||||||||
YES
x NO o
|
||||||||||
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See definition of “accelerated filer,” “large
accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act, (Check One):
|
||||||||||
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and
posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File
required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES o NO
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
|
||||||||||
YES
o NO x
|
||||||||||
Common
Shares outstanding as of
|
November
5, 2009
|
|||||||||
Class
A Common Shares
|
5,808,794
|
|||||||||
Class
B Common Shares
|
858,835
|
1
THE L. S.
STARRETT COMPANY
CONTENTS
Page No.
|
||
Part
I. Financial
Information:
|
||
Item
1. Financial
Statements
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Operations –
thirteen
weeks ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008
(unaudited)
|
3
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows –
thirteen
weeks ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008
(unaudited)
|
4
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets –
September
26, 2009 (unaudited) and June 27, 2009
|
5
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders' Equity -
thirteen
weeks ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008
(unaudited)
|
6
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
7-11
|
|
Item
2.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
|
11-16
|
|
Item
3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
|
16
|
|
Item
4. Controls
and Procedures
|
16-17
|
|
Part
II. Other information:
|
||
Item
5. Risk
Factors
|
17
|
|
Item
6. Exhibits
|
17
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
17
|
2
Part I.
Financial Information
Item 1.
Financial Statements
THE L. S.
STARRETT COMPANY
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
(in
thousands of dollars except per share data)(unaudited)
13 Weeks Ended
|
||||||||
9/26/09
|
9/27/08
|
|||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 40,573 | $ | 67,985 | ||||
Cost
of goods sold
|
(30,541 | ) | (46,792 | ) | ||||
Selling
and general expense
|
(14,353 | ) | (17,498 | ) | ||||
Other
(expense) income
|
(388 | ) | 535 | |||||
Earnings
(loss) before income taxes
|
(4,709 | ) | 4,230 | |||||
Income
tax (benefit) expense
|
(1,578 | ) | 1,607 | |||||
Net
(loss) earnings
|
$ | (3,131 | ) | $ | 2,623 | |||
Basic
and diluted earnings per share
|
$ | (.47 | ) | $ | 0.40 | |||
Average
outstanding shares used in per share calculations (in
thousands):
|
||||||||
Basic
|
6,651 | 6,618 | ||||||
Diluted
|
6,651 | 6,627 | ||||||
Dividends
per share
|
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.12 | ||||
See Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
THE L. S.
STARRETT COMPANY
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
(in
thousands of dollars)(unaudited)
13 Weeks Ended
|
||||||||
9/26/09
|
9/27/08
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net (loss)
earnings
|
$ | (3,131 | ) | $ | 2,623 | |||
Non-cash items
included:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
|
2,253 | 2,356 | ||||||
Amortization
|
313 | 312 | ||||||
Net long-term tax
payable
|
2 | 101 | ||||||
Deferred taxes
|
59 | 77 | ||||||
Unrealized transaction (gains)
losses
|
(79 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||
Retirement cost
(benefits)
|
971 | (510 | ) | |||||
Working capital
changes:
|
||||||||
Receivables
|
(39 | ) | (2,231 | ) | ||||
Inventories
|
5,355 | (4,364 | ) | |||||
Other current
assets
|
186 | (617 | ) | |||||
Other current
liabilities
|
(1,343 | ) | (195 | ) | ||||
Prepaid pension cost and
other
|
(138 | ) | 978 | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities
|
4,409 | (1,494 | ) | |||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Additions to plant and
equipment
|
(2,783 | ) | (2,968 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from
investments
|
615 | 3,299 | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by
investing activities
|
(2,168 | ) | 331 | |||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Proceeds from short-term
borrowings
|
11,887 | 4,036 | ||||||
Short-term debt
repayments
|
(14,887 | ) | (420 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from long-term borrowings
|
129 | - | ||||||
Long-term debt
repayments
|
(171 | ) | (134 | ) | ||||
Common stock
issued
|
162 | 156 | ||||||
Dividends paid
|
(799 | ) | (794 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used in) provided by
financing activities
|
(3,679 | ) | 2,844 | |||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
121 | (514 | ) | |||||
Net
(decrease) increase in cash
|
(1,317 | ) | 1,167 | |||||
Cash,
beginning of period
|
10,248 | 6,515 | ||||||
Cash,
end of period
|
8,931 | $ | 7,682 | |||||
See Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
THE L. S.
STARRETT COMPANY
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(in
thousands of dollars except share data)
Sept.
26
2009
(unaudited)
|
June
27 2009
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 8,931 | $ | 10,248 | ||||
Investments
|
1,260 | 1,791 | ||||||
Accounts receivable (less
allowance for doubtful accounts of $493 and $678)
|
28,108 | 27,233 | ||||||
Inventories:
|
||||||||
Raw materials and
supplies
|
19,082 | 19,672 | ||||||
Goods in process and finished
parts
|
19,070 | 20,265 | ||||||
Finished goods
|
17,763 | 20,289 | ||||||
55,915 | 60,226 | |||||||
Current deferred income tax
asset
|
5,135 | 5,170 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses, taxes and other
current assets
|
8,108 | 8,054 | ||||||
Total current
assets
|
107,457 | 112,722 | ||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, at cost (less accumulated depreciation
of $125,664 and $122,856)
|
58,178 | 56,956 | ||||||
Property
held for sale
|
2,771 | 2,771 | ||||||
Intangible
assets (less accumulated amortization of $4,037 and
$3,724)
|
2,204 | 2,517 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
981 | 981 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
243 | 275 | ||||||
Long-term
taxes receivable
|
2,807 | 2,807 | ||||||
Long-term
deferred income tax asset
|
15,240 | 15,212 | ||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 189,881 | $ | 194,241 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Notes payable and current
maturities
|
$ | 7,396 | $ | 10,136 | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued
expenses
|
9,975 | 10,369 | ||||||
Accrued salaries and
wages
|
4,387 | 5,109 | ||||||
Total current
liabilities
|
21,758 | 25,614 | ||||||
Long-term
taxes payable
|
9,235 | 9,140 | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
1,207 | 1,264 | ||||||
Postretirement
benefit and pension liability
|
16,066 | 15,345 | ||||||
Total liabilities
|
48,266 | 51,363 | ||||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
||||||||
Class
A Common $1 par (20,000,000 shrs. authorized)
5,797,413
outstanding on 9/26/09
5,769,894
outstanding on 6/27/09
|
5,797 | 5,770 | ||||||
Class
B Common $1 par (10,000,000 shrs. authorized)
861,636
outstanding on 9/26/09,
869,426
outstanding on 6/27/09
|
862 | 869 | ||||||
Additional paid-in
capital
|
50,141 | 49,984 | ||||||
Retained earnings reinvested
and employed in the business
|
123,777 | 127,707 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss
|
(38,962 | ) | (41,452 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders'
equity
|
141,615 | 142,878 | ||||||
Total liabilities and
stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 189,881 | $ | 194,241 |
See Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
THE L. S.
STARRETT COMPANY
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders' Equity
For the
Thirteen Weeks Ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008
(in
thousands of dollars except per share data)
(unaudited)
Common
Stock
Out-standing
($1
Par)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class
A
|
Class
B
|
Addi-
tional
Paid-in
Capital
|
Retained
Earnings
|
Accumulated
Other
Com-
prehensive
Loss
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance
June 28, 2008
|
$ | 5,708 | $ | 906 | $ | 49,613 | $ | 134,109 | $ | (3,563 | ) | $ | 186,773 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive
income (loss):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings
|
2,623 | 2,623 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized net gain on investments
and
swap agreement
|
39 | 39 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Translation loss,
net
|
(3,044 | ) | (3,044 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive (loss)
|
(382 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
($.12 per share)
|
(794 | ) | (794 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury
shares:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchased
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issued
|
7 | 149 | 156 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of stock under ESPP
|
15 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion
|
18 | (18 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
September 27, 2008
|
$ | 5,733 | $ | 888 | $ | 49,777 | $ | 135,938 | $ | (6,568 | ) | $ | 185,768 | |||||||||||
Balance
June 27, 2009
|
$ | 5,770 | $ | 869 | $ | 49,984 | $ | 127,707 | $ | (41,452 | ) | $ | 142,878 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive
income (loss):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net (loss)
|
(3,131 | ) | (3,131 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized net gain on
investments
|
9 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Translation gain,
net
|
2,481 | 2,481 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive (loss)
|
(641 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
($0.12 per share)
|
(799 | ) | (799 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury
shares:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchased
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issued
|
20 | 142 | 162 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of stock under ESPP
|
15 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion
|
7 | (7 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
September 26, 2009
|
$ | 5,797 | $ | 862 | $ | 50,141 | $ | 123,777 | $ | (38,962 | ) | $ | 141,615 | |||||||||||
Cumulative
Balance:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Translation loss
|
(11,337 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on investments and
swap agreements
|
7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts not recognized as a
component of net periodic benefit cost
|
(27,632 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | (38,962 | ) |
See Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
6
THE L. S.
STARRETT COMPANY
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
1.
Basis of Presentation
In the
opinion of management, the accompanying financial statements contain all
adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present
fairly the financial position of the Company as of September 26, 2009 and June
27, 2009; the results of operations and cash flows for the thirteen weeks ended
September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008; and changes in stockholders' equity
for the thirteen weeks ended September 26, 2009 and September 27,
2008.
The
Company follows the same accounting policies in the preparation of interim
statements as described in the Company's Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended June 27, 2009, and these financial statements should be
read in conjunction with the Annual Report on Form 10-K. Note that significant
foreign locations are reported on a one month lag.
2.
Cash and Investments
Included
in investments at September 26, 2009 is $1.3 million of AAA rated Puerto Rico
debt obligations that have maturities greater than one year but carry the
benefit of possibly reducing repatriation taxes. These investments represent
“core cash” and are part of the Company’s overall cash management and liquidity
program and are considered “available for sale.” The investments themselves are
highly liquid, carry no early redemption penalties, and are not designated for
acquiring non-current assets. Cash and investments held in foreign
locations amounted to $5.7 million and $8.4 million at September 26, 2009 and
June 27, 2009.
On
October 1, 2008, the Company adopted a new accounting standard which
defines and establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures about fair value instruments. The Company has categorized its
financial assets, based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation
technique, into a three-level fair value hierarchy as set forth below. If the
inputs used to measure the financial instruments fall within different levels of
the hierarchy, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is
significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
Financial
assets recorded on the balance sheets are categorized based on the inputs to the
valuation techniques as follows:
o
|
Level
1 – Financial assets whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices
for identical assets or liabilities in an active market which the company
has the ability to access at the measurement date (examples include active
exchange-traded equity securities and most U.S. Government and agency
securities).
|
o
|
Level
2 – Financial assets whose values are based on quoted market prices in
markets where trading occurs infrequently or whose values are based on
quoted prices of instruments with similar attributes in active markets.
The Company does not have any Level 2 financial assets as of September 26,
2009.
|
o
|
Level
3 – Financial assets whose values are based on prices or valuation
techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant
to the overall fair value measurement. These inputs reflect management’s
own estimate about the assumptions a market participant would use in
pricing the asset. The Company does not have any Level 3 financial assets
as of September 26, 2009.
|
As
of September 26, 2009, the Company’s Level 1 financial assets were as
follows (in thousands):
Level 1
|
||||
International
Bonds (Puerto Rican debt obligations)
|
1,260 | |||
$ | 1,260 |
3.
Inventories
Approximately
54% of all inventories are valued on the LIFO method. LIFO
inventories were $14.4 million and $17.8 million at September 26, 2009 and June
27, 2009, respectively, such amounts being approximately $34.1 million and $33.7
million, respectively, less than if determined on a FIFO basis. The Company has
not realized any material LIFO layer liquidation profits in the periods
presented. The Company had inventory turns of 2.8 times and 2.4 times at
September 26, 2009 and June 27, 2009, respectively.
7
4.
Goodwill and Intangibles
The
following tables present information about the Company’s goodwill and other
intangible assets on the dates or for the periods indicated (in
thousands):
As of September 26, 2009
|
As of June 27, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying Amount
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
Net
|
Carrying Amount
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
Net
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill
|
$ | 981 | - | $ | 981 | $ | 981 | - | $ | 981 | ||||||||||||||
Other
Intangible Assets
|
$ | 6,241 | $ | (4,037 | ) | $ | 2,204 | $ | 6,241 | $ | (3,724 | ) | $ | 2,517 |
The
Company completed its annual evaluation of goodwill and intangibles at June 27,
2009. At this time we did not recognize any additional impairment of
goodwill and intangibles beyond what was previously disclosed in our second
quarter 2009 form 10Q.
During
the first quarter 2010 the Company investigated if there was a triggering event
that would cause the Company to revaluate impairment of goodwill and intangible
assets as outlined in the accounting standard for goodwill and intangible
assets. The Company concluded that there were no triggering events
during the first quarter 2010.
As there
were no triggering events for the intangible assets, the Company also concluded
that there were no triggering events in relation to impairment of long lived
tangible assets.
5.
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses at September 26, 2009 and June 27, 2009 consisted
primarily of accounts payable ($4.7 million and $3.7 million), accrued benefits
($1.3 million and $1.2 million), accrued expenses ($2.3 million and $3.4
million) and accrued taxes other than income taxes ($1.7 million and $2.1
million). Days in accounts payable were 71 days and 69 days at September 26,
2009 and June 27, 2009, respectively.
6.
Other Income (Expense)
Other
income (expense) is comprised of the following (in thousands):
Thirteen Weeks
Ended September
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Interest income
|
$ | 70 | $ | 317 | ||||
Interest expense and commitment
fees
|
(146 | ) | (182 | ) | ||||
Realized and unrealized foreign
exchange (losses) gains, net
|
(237 | ) | 430 | |||||
Other
|
(75 | ) | (30 | ) | ||||
Other (expense)
income
|
$ | (388 | ) | $ | 535 | |||
7.
Income Taxes
|
The
Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax and various state, local and
international income taxes in numerous jurisdictions. The Company’s domestic and
international tax liabilities are subject to the allocation of revenues and
expenses in different jurisdictions and the timing of recognizing revenues and
expenses. Additionally, the amount of income taxes paid is subject to the
Company’s interpretation of applicable tax laws in the jurisdictions in which it
files.
The
Company has substantially concluded all U.S. federal income tax matters for
years through fiscal 2003. Currently, we do not have any income tax audits in
progress in the numerous federal, state, local and international jurisdictions
in which we operate. In international jurisdictions including Argentina,
Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, UK, Germany, New Zealand, and Mexico, which
comprise a significant portion of the Company’s operations, the years that may
be examined vary, with the earliest year being 2004 (except for Brazil, which
has 1997-2009 still open for examination).
The
Company has identified no uncertain tax position for which it is reasonably
possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly
increase or decrease within the next twelve months.
8
No
valuation allowance has been recorded for the domestic federal NOL as the
Company continues to believe that based on forecasted future taxable income and
certain tax planning strategies available, it is more likely than not that it
will be able to utilize its tax operating loss carryforward
assets..
8.
Pension and Post Retirement Benefits
Net
periodic benefit costs (benefits) for the Company's defined benefit pension
plans consist of the following (in thousands):
Thirteen Weeks
Ended September
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Service cost
|
$ | 487 | $ | 573 | ||||
Interest cost
|
1,580 | 1,784 | ||||||
Expected return on plan
assets
|
(1,789 | ) | (2,636 | ) | ||||
Amort. of transition
obligation
|
- | - | ||||||
Amort. of prior service
cost
|
96 | 110 | ||||||
Amort. of unrecognized loss
(gain)
|
702 | (3 | ) | |||||
$ | 1,076 | $ | (172 | ) | ||||
Net
periodic costs (benefits) for the Company's postretirement medical plan consist
of the following (in thousands):
Thirteen Weeks
Ended September
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Service cost
|
$ | 85 | $ | 88 | ||||
Interest cost
|
169 | 177 | ||||||
Amort. of prior service
cost
|
(226 | ) | (226 | ) | ||||
Amort. of unrecognized
loss
|
- | - | ||||||
$ | 28 | $ | 39 | |||||
9.
Long-term Debt
Long-term
debt is comprised of the following (in thousands):
Sept.
26,
2009
|
June
27,
2009
|
|||||||
Capitalized lease
obligations-domestic (payable in US dollars)
|
$ | 1,147 | $ | 1,077 | ||||
Capitalized
lease obligations payable in Brazilian currency due 2009-2011,
10.7%-23.1%
|
712 | 811 | ||||||
1,859 | 1,888 | |||||||
Less current
portion
|
652 | 624 | ||||||
$ | 1,207 | $ | 1,264 |
Current
notes payable primarily in Brazilian currency carry interest at up to 23.1%. The
average rate for the current quarter was approximately 5.0%.
The
Company was not in compliance with its leverage ratio covenant. However, the
Company received a waiver from the lender for default of the
covenant.
10.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In fiscal
2010 the Company adopted a new accounting standard which requires employers to
provide more transparency about the assets in their postretirement benefit
plans, including defined benefit pension plans. This new standard was issued in
response to users’ concerns that employers’ financial statements do not provide
adequate transparency about the types of assets and associated risks in
employers’ postretirement plans. In current disclosures of the major categories
of plan assets, many employers provide information about only four asset
categories: equity, debt, real estate, and other investments. For many
employers, the “other investment” category has increased to include a
significant percentage of plan assets. Users indicate that such disclosure is
not sufficiently specific to permit evaluation of the nature and risks of assets
held as investments. Our adoption did not have a material effect on the
Company’s financial position and results of operation.
9
In
September 2009, we adopted a newly issued accounting standard related to
earnings per share. This standard applies to redemptions and induced
conversions of equity-classified preferred stock instruments. Our
adoption did not impact our financial position or results of
operations.
In June
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) established the FASB Accounting Standards
CodificationTM
(“Codification”) to become the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by
nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued under authority of federal securities laws
are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. Our adoption of
the Codification did not impact our financial position or results of
operations.
The
Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards.
All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the
Codification will become non-authoritative. The FASB will not issue new
standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues
Task Force Abstracts. Instead, the FASB will issue Accounting Standards Updates,
which will serve only to: (a) update the Codification;
(b) provide background
information about the guidance; and (c) provide the bases for
conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification.
In May
2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard providing guidance for
subsequent events. This guidance establishes general standards of
accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date
but before financial statements are issued or are available to be
issued. It sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during
which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions
that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial
statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or
transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements,
and the disclosures that an entity should make about the events or transactions
that occurred after the balance sheet date. We adopted this guidance
effective June 30, 2009, which was the required effective date. We
evaluated our September 26, 2009 financial statements for subsequent events
through November 5, 2009, the date the financial statements were
issued. All subsequent events have been disclosed in the financial
statements.
In April
2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard providing guidance for
determining fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or
liability have significantly decreased and identifying transactions that are not
orderly. This guidance clarifies the application of previous guidance
in a market when an asset or liability is not being actively traded or the
transaction is not orderly. We adopted this guidance effective April
1, 2009 and the adoption did not have a significant effect on our financial
statements.
In
October 2008, the FASB issued a new accounting standard providing guidance for
determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that asset
is not active. This guidance clarifies the application of previous
guidance in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate
key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the
market for that financial asset is not active. We adopted this guidance
effective January 1, 2009 and the adoption did not have a significant effect on
our financial statements.
In April
2008, the FASB issued a new accounting standard providing guidance for
determination of the useful life of intangible assets. This guidance amends the
factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions
used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under
previous guidance. We adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2009
and the adoption did not have a significant effect on our financial
statements.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued a new accounting standard providing guidance for
fair value measurements. This guidance defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. This guidance applies
under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value
measurements. Accordingly, this guidance does not require any new
fair value measurements. However, for some entities, the application
of this guidance will change current practice. The changes to current
practice resulting from the application of this guidance relate to the
definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value and the
expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of
this guidance were effective as of January 1, 2008, with the cumulative effect
of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening
retained earnings. However, delayed application of this statement was
permitted for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items
that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
recurring basis (at least annually), until fiscal years beginning after November
15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted the
remaining provisions of this guidance effective July 1, 2009 and the adoption
did not have a significant effect on our financial statements.
10
11.
Fair Value
The
following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each
class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate
value.
o
|
Cash
and short term instruments
|
The
carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short maturity of those
investments
o
|
Long
term investments
|
The fair
value of some investments are estimated on quoted market prices for those or
similar investments.
o
|
Long
term debt
|
The fair
value of the Company’s long term debt is estimated on quoted market prices for
the same or similar issues or on the current rates offered to the Company for
debt of the same remaining maturities.
o
|
Foreign
currency contracts
|
The fair
value of foreign currency contracts is estimated by taking the difference from
the contract exchange rate and the current exchange rate of the contract and
multiplying it by the face value of the contract.
The
estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments is as follows in
thousands (000):
September
26,2009
|
June
27,2009
|
|||||||||||||||
Carrying
Amount
|
Fair
Value
|
Carrying
Amount
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 8,931 | $ | 8,931 | $ | 10,248 | $ | 10,248 | ||||||||
Investments
|
1,260 | 1,260 | 1,791 | 1,791 | ||||||||||||
Foreign
currency contracts
|
- | (248 | ) | - | 273 |
Item
2.
MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Overview
The
Company suffered the continued impact of the global recession during the first
quarter of fiscal 2010. The level of business did not materially change from the
very low levels of business we have been experiencing since January 2009. This
was not unexpected given the severity of the recession and that the company
historically has lagged behind the economy. Sales in the first
quarter were $40.6 million a decrease of 40% over the same quarter of fiscal
2009 which was prior to the financial sector collapse. The Company
incurred a loss of $3.1 million, or $(.47) per basic and diluted share, in the
first quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to a net income of $2.6 million, or $.40
per basic and diluted share, in the first quarter of fiscal
2009. This represents a decrease in net income of $5.7 million
comprised of a decrease in gross margin of $11.2 million, a decrease of other
income of $.9 million, offset by a decrease of $3.2 million in selling, general
and administrative costs and a decrease in income tax expense of $3.2
million. Both domestic and international markets contributed to this
reduction in performance. These items are discussed in more detail
below.
Net
Sales
Net sales
for the first quarter of 2010 decreased 40% compared to the first quarter of
2009. Foreign sales excluding North America decreased $16.4 million
or (45.4)%. Contributing to the decline in sales on a comparative basis was the
strengthening of the dollar against the British pound and the Brazilian real by
15.6% and 16.4% respectively. The total foreign currency effect for all foreign
entities was a decline of 29% in local currency. In North America, sales
decreased $11.0 million or (34.6)%. The decrease in North America
sales is attributed to the continued destocking of the supply chain as the need
for cash liquidity remained a priority. Further compounding the negative
comparative results, the company announced a price increase in September of 2008
which resulted in increased sales orders during the first quarter of last year
(fiscal 2009).
On a
positive note while sales remain anemic they increased in the first quarter of
fiscal 2010 by $1.7 million compared with the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 from
$38.8 million to $40.6 million. North America contributed to 69% of the increase
while the foreign markets contributed to 31% of the increase in part from the
weakening of the U.S. dollar. The company is beginning to see signs
from its customers that they are returning to the market after liquidating
inventory to meet their new sales demand.
Earnings before income
taxes
The first
quarter 2010 pretax loss of $4.7 million represents a decrease of pre-tax
earnings of $8.9 million from the first quarter 2009 pre-tax earnings of $4.2
million. Approximately $11.2 million is at the gross margin line. The
gross margin percentage changed from 31.2% from the first quarter 2009 to 24.7%
in the first quarter 2010. The eroding gross margin is primarily a result of a
significant drop in sales dollar volume resulting in the under absorption of
overhead in the factories. This was compounded by a concerted effort to reduce
inventories to support lower sales volumes. Effects of LIFO liquidations were
not material in the first quarter 2009.
11
Selling
and general expense decreased $3.1 million in the first quarter 2010 against the
first quarter 2009. As a percentage of sales, selling and general
expenses increased from 25.7% in the first quarter 2009 to 35.4% in the first
quarter 2010. The decrease in selling, general and administrative
expense is primarily a result of lower commissions due to lower sales ($.5
million), lower profit sharing and bonus ($.7 million), decrease in computer
maintenance and support ($.1 million), reduction in salaried payroll of ($1.1
million), decreased travel expenses of ($.3 million) and decrease in shipping
expenses of ($.2 million).
The
income decrease in other income (expense) results primarily from a realization
of foreign exchange losses in the fiscal 2010 quarter versus exchange gains in
the fiscal 2009 quarter of $.7 million.
Income
taxes
The
effective income tax rate is 34% in the fiscal 2010 quarter versus 38% for the
fiscal 2009 quarter. Both rates reflect a combined federal, state and
foreign rate adjusted for permanent book/tax differences, the most significant
of which is the anticipated effect of the Brazilian dividend to be paid in the
third quarter of 2010 and the dividend paid in the second quarter of fiscal
2009. The change in the effective rate percentage reflects the lesser
impact of permanent book/tax differences and the Brazilian dividend on lower
forecasted taxable income.
No
changes in valuation allowances relating to foreign NOL’s, foreign tax credit
carryforwards and certain state NOL’s are anticipated for fiscal 2010 at this
time. The Company continues to believe that it is more likely than
not that it will be able to utilize its tax operating loss carryforward assets
reflected on the balance sheet.
Net earnings per
share
As a
result of the above factors, the Company had basic and diluted net loss of
$(.47) per share in the fiscal 2010 quarter compared to basic and diluted net
income per share of $.40 in the fiscal 2009 quarter.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash
flows (in thousands)
|
13 Weeks Ended
|
|||||||
9/26/09
|
9/27/08
|
|||||||
Cash provided by (used in)
operations
|
$ | 4,409 | $ | (1,494 | ) | |||
Cash (used in) provided by
investing activities
|
(2,168 | ) | 331 | |||||
Cash (used in) provided by
financing activities
|
(3,679 | ) | 2,844 | |||||
Cash
provided by operations for the first quarter 2010 was $4.4
million. Primary components that contributed to the cash flow were
the operating loss of $(3.1) million, a reduction of inventories of $5.4 million
and a decrease in other current liabilities of $(1.3) million.
The
Company has a continuing initiative to right size the global inventory to
support the sales level brought about by the global recession resulting in the
$5.4 million decrease in inventories. The decrease in other liabilities of
$(1.3) million is a result of lower spending necessitated by the lower
production volumes and SG&A spending required to meet current sales
demand.
Cash used
in investing activities for the first quarter 2010 was $2.2
million. This was driven by capital expenditures of $2.8 million and
proceeds from investments of $.6 million.
12
The major
capital projects spending were for our Oracle R12 global implementation project
and hydro electric project in Athol, MA.
Cash used
in financing activities for the first quarter 2010 of $3.7 million was caused by
the pay off of the Bank of American revolving loan and line of credit offset
partially by the advance on the new line of credit with TD Bank.
Liquidity
and credit arrangements
The
Company believes it maintains sufficient liquidity and has the resources to fund
its operations in the near term. In addition to its cash and
investments, the Company maintains a $23 million line of credit, of which, as of
September 26, 2009, $4.3 million was temporarily taken down for short-term
working capital purposes and $1.0 million was being utilized in the form of
standby letters of credit for insurance purposes. The interest rate
for the line of credit is calculated by taking the current LIBOR rate and adding
a margin to the rate determined by the leverage ratio. At September
26, 2009 the interest rate was calculated to be 2.01% which included a margin of
1.75%. The table below sets out the various rates depending on the
leverage ratio for the line of credit.
Level
|
Leverage
Ratio
|
Margin
|
|||||
1 |
Less
than 1.00
|
1.50 | % | ||||
2 |
1.00
to 2.00
|
1.75 | % | ||||
3 |
Greater
than 2.00 and up to and including 2.50
|
2.00 | % | ||||
4 |
Greater
than 2.50
|
2.25 | % |
Although
the credit line is not currently collateralized, it is possible, based on the
Company's financial performance, that in the future the Company will have to
provide collateral. The Company has a working capital ratio of 4.9 to
one as of September 26, 2009 and 4.4 to one as of June 27, 2009.
As of
September 26, 2009, the Company was not in compliance with its leverage ratio
covenant under the line of credit. However, the Company received a waiver from
the lender for the default of the covenant for the period ended September 26,
2009.
STRATEGIC
ACTIVITIES
Globalization
has had a profound impact on product offerings and buying behaviors of industry
and consumers in North America and around the world, forcing the Company to
adapt to this new, highly competitive business environment. The Company
continuously evaluates most all aspects of its business, aiming for new
world-class ideas to set itself apart from its competition.
The
strategic focus has shifted from manufacturing locations to global brand
building through product portfolio and distribution channels management while
reducing costs through lean manufacturing, plant consolidations, global sourcing
and improved logistics.
The
execution of these strategic initiatives has expanded the Company’s
manufacturing and distribution in developing economies which has increased its
international sales revenues to approximately 49% of its consolidated
sales.
On
September 21, 2006, the Company sold its Alum Bank, PA level manufacturing plant
and relocated the manufacturing to the Dominican Republic, where production
began in fiscal 2005. The tape measure production of the Evans Rule Division
facilities in Puerto Rico and Charleston, SC has been transferred to the
Dominican Republic. The Company vacated and plans to sell its Evans Rule
facility in North Charleston, SC. The Company’s goal is to achieve labor savings
and maintain margins while satisfying the demands of its customers for lower
prices. The Company has closed three warehouses, the most recent being the
Glendale, AZ facility, which was sold in fiscal 2008. In 2006, the Company began
a lean program in the Athol, MA facility. This program was initiated to improve
efficiencies and is still ongoing.
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The
Company does not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements as defined
under the Securities and Exchange Commission rules.
13
INFLATION
The
Company has experienced modest inflation relative to its material cost, much of
which cannot be passed on to the customer through increased prices.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The
preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the
amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying
notes. The second footnote to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27,
2009 describes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the
preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
Judgments,
assumptions and estimates are used for, but not limited to, the allowance for
doubtful accounts receivable and returned goods; inventory allowances; income
tax reserves; employee turnover, discount, and return rates used to calculate
pension obligations; investments; and normal expense accruals for such things as
workers’ compensation and employee medical expenses.
Future
events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute
certainty. Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the
exercise of judgment. Actual results may differ from those estimates,
and such differences may be material to the Company’s Consolidated Financial
Statements. The following sections describe the Company’s critical
accounting policies.
Sales of
merchandise and freight billed to customers are recognized when title passes and
all substantial risks of ownership change, which generally occurs either upon
shipment or upon delivery based upon contractual terms. Sales are net
of provision for cash discounts, returns, customer discounts (such as volume or
trade discounts), cooperative advertising and other sales related
discounts. Outbound shipping costs absorbed by the Company and
inbound freight included in material purchases are included in the cost of
sales.
The
allowance for doubtful accounts and sales returns of $1.6 million and $.9
million as of September 26, 2009 and June 27, 2009, respectively, is based on
the Company’s assessment of the collectibility of specific customer accounts,
the aging of the Company’s accounts receivable and trends in product returns.
While the Company believes that the allowance for doubtful accounts and sales
returns is adequate, if there is a deterioration of a major customer’s credit
worthiness, actual defaults are higher than the Company’s previous experience,
or actual future returns do not reflect historical trends, the Company could be
adversely affected.
Inventory
purchases and commitments are based upon future demand forecasts. If there is a
sudden and significant decrease in demand for the Company’s products or there is
a higher risk of inventory obsolescence because of rapidly changing technology
and requirements, the Company may be required to increase the inventory reserve
and, as a result, gross profit margin could be adversely affected.
The
Company generally values property, plant and equipment (PP&E) at historical
cost less accumulated depreciation. Impairment losses are recorded when
indicators of impairment, such as plant closures, are present and the
undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than
the carrying amount. The Company continually reviews for such impairment and
believes that PP&E is being carried at its appropriate value.
The
Company assesses the fair value of its goodwill, generally based upon a
discounted cash flow methodology. The discounted cash flows are
estimated utilizing various assumptions regarding future revenue and expenses,
working capital, terminal value, and market discount rates. If the
carrying amount of the goodwill is greater than the fair value, goodwill
impairment may be present. An impairment charge is recognized to the
extent the recorded goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of
goodwill.
Accounting
for income taxes requires estimates of future tax liabilities. Due to temporary
differences in the timing of recognition of items included in income for
accounting and tax purposes, deferred tax assets or liabilities are recorded to
reflect the impact arising from these differences on future tax payments. With
respect to recorded tax assets, the Company assesses the likelihood that the
asset will be realized. If realization is in doubt because of uncertainty
regarding future profitability or enacted tax rates, the Company provides a
valuation allowance related to the asset. Should any significant changes in the
tax law or the estimate of the necessary valuation allowance occur, the Company
would record the impact of the change, which could have a material effect on the
Company’s financial position or results of operations.
14
Pension
and postretirement medical costs and obligations are dependent on assumptions
used by the Company’s actuaries in calculating such amounts. These assumptions
include discount rates, healthcare cost trends, inflation, salary growth,
long-term return on plan assets, employment turnover rates, retirement rates,
mortality rates and other factors. These assumptions are made based on a
combination of external market factors, actual historical experience, long-term
trend analysis, and an analysis of the assumptions being used by other companies
with similar plans. Actual results that differ from our assumptions are
accumulated and amortized over future periods. Significant differences in actual
experience or significant changes in assumptions would affect the Company’s
pension and other postretirement benefit costs and obligations.
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In fiscal
2010 the Company adopted a new accounting standard which requires employers to
provide more transparency about the assets in their postretirement benefit
plans, including defined benefit pension plans. This new standard was issued in
response to users’ concerns that employers’ financial statements do not provide
adequate transparency about the types of assets and associated risks in
employers’ postretirement plans. In current disclosures of the major categories
of plan assets, many employers provide information about only four asset
categories: equity, debt, real estate, and other investments. For many
employers, the “other investment” category has increased to include a
significant percentage of plan assets. Users indicate that such disclosure is
not sufficiently specific to permit evaluation of the nature and risks of assets
held as investments. The adoption of this new standard did not have a material
effect on the Company’s financial position and results of
operation.
In
September 2009, we adopted a newly issued accounting standard related to
earnings per share. This standard applies to redemptions and induced
conversions of equity-classified preferred stock instruments. Our
adoption did not impact our financial position or results of
operations.
In June
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) established the FASB Accounting Standards
CodificationTM
(“Codification”) to become the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by
nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued under authority of federal securities laws
are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. Our adoption of
the Codification did not impact our financial position or results of
operations.
The
Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards.
All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the
Codification will become non-authoritative. The FASB will not issue new
standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues
Task Force Abstracts. Instead, the FASB will issue Accounting Standards Updates,
which will serve only to: (a) update the Codification;
(b) provide background
information about the guidance; and (c) provide the bases for
conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification.
In May
2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard providing guidance for
subsequent events. This guidance establishes general standards of
accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date
but before financial statements are issued or are available to be
issued. It sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during
which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions
that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial
statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or
transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements,
and the disclosures that an entity should make about the events or transactions
that occurred after the balance sheet date. We adopted this guidance
effective June 30, 2009, which was the required effective date. We
evaluated our September 30, 2009 financial statements for subsequent events
through November 5, 2009, the date the financial statements were
issued. All subsequent events have been disclosed in the financial
statements.
In April
2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard providing guidance for
determining fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or
liability have significantly decreased and identifying transactions that are not
orderly. This guidance clarifies the application of previous guidance
in a market when an asset or liability is not being actively traded or the
transaction is not orderly. We adopted this guidance effective April
1, 2009 and the adoption did not have a significant effect on our financial
statements.
15
In
October 2008, the FASB issued a new accounting standard providing guidance for
determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that asset
is not active. This guidance clarifies the application of previous
guidance in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate
key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the
market for that financial asset is not active. We adopted this guidance
effective January 1, 2009 and the adoption did not have a significant effect on
our financial statements.
In April
2008, the FASB issued a new accounting standard providing guidance for
determination of the useful life of intangible assets. This guidance amends the
factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions
used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under
previous guidance. We adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2009
and the adoption did not have a significant effect on our financial
statements.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued a new accounting standard providing guidance for
fair value measurements. This guidance defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. This guidance applies
under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value
measurements. Accordingly, this guidance does not require any new
fair value measurements. However, for some entities, the application
of this guidance will change current practice. The changes to current
practice resulting from the application of this guidance relate to the
definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value and the
expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of
this guidance were effective as of January 1, 2008, with the cumulative effect
of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening
retained earnings. However, delayed application of this statement was
permitted for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items
that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
recurring basis (at least annually), until fiscal years beginning after November
15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted the
remaining provisions of this guidance effective July 1, 2009 and the adoption
did not have a significant effect on our financial statements.
Item
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market
risk is the potential change in a financial instrument’s value caused by
fluctuations in interest and currency exchange rates, and equity and commodity
prices. The Company's operating activities expose it to risks that are
continually monitored, evaluated, and managed. Proper management of these risks
helps reduce the likelihood of earnings volatility. At September 27, 2008, the
Company was party to an interest rate swap agreement, which is more fully
described in the fiscal 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company does not
enter into long-term supply contracts with either fixed prices or quantities.
The Company does not engage in regular hedging activities to minimize the impact
of foreign currency fluctuations. Net foreign monetary assets are approximately
$16.8 million.
A 10%
change in interest rates would not have a significant impact on the aggregate
net fair value of the Company's interest rate sensitive financial instruments
(primarily debt of $4.3 million at September 26, 2009) or the cash flows or
future earnings associated with this financial instrument. A 10% change in
interest rates would impact the fair value of the Company's fixed rate
investments of approximately $1.3 million by approximately $8,000.
Item
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
DISCLOSURE ON MATERIAL WEAKNESS
Status of
Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management’s
remediation efforts related to the material weakness that existed as of June 27,
2009, and noted in Item 9A of the Company’s 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed on September 10, 2009, are not complete as of September 26, 2009. Efforts
to remediate the material weakness will continue during fiscal 2010. An update
as to the status of management’s efforts is listed below:
o
|
The
Company hired a new Chief Financial Officer, effective as of November 5,
2009
|
o
|
The
Company is in the process of enhancing its accounting policies and
procedures for subsidiaries
|
o
|
The
Company has affirmed subsidiaries’ responsibility to the Corporate Finance
Group
|
o
|
The
Company is working on improved subsidiary and corporate level analysis of
all significant financial statement
accounts
|
o
|
The
Company will be working with the new CFO on developing a site visit plan
based on subsidiary risk management consideration and coordinating such
visits with internal audit.
|
16
The
Company's management, under the supervision and with the participation of the
Company's President and Chief Executive Officer, has evaluated the Company's
disclosure controls and procedures as of September 26, 2009, and they have
concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective
as of such date. All information required to be filed in this report was
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period required by
the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that
such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management,
including the Chief Executive Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. There have been no other changes in internal
control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over
financial reporting
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item
5. Risk Factors
SAFE
HARBOR STATEMENT
UNDER
THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements about the
Company’s business, competition, sales, expenditures, foreign operations, plans
for reorganization, interest rate sensitivity, debt service, liquidity and
capital resources, and other operating and capital requirements. In addition,
forward-looking statements may be included in future Company documents and in
oral statements by Company representatives to securities analysts and
investors. The Company is subject to risks that could cause actual
events to vary materially from such forward-looking statements. You should
carefully review and consider the information regarding certain factors which
could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results set
forth under Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Form 10-K for the year
ended June 27, 2009. There have been no material changes from the factors
disclosed in our Form 10-K for the year ended June 27, 2009, except for a
material weakness in Internal Control over financial reporting. Management has
developed a plan to remediate this condition, which is described in Item 4 in
this form 10Q. We may disclose changes to such factors or disclose additional
factors from time to time in our future filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Item
6. Exhibits
|
31a
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e)/15(d)-15(e) and
13a-15(f)/15(d)-15(f), filed
herewith.
|
|
31b
|
Certification
of Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e)/15(d)-15(e)
and 13a-15(f)/15(d)-15(f), filed
herewith.
|
|
32
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code), filed herewith.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
THE
L. S. STARRETT COMPANY
(Registrant)
|
|||
Date
|
November
5 , 2009
|
D.
A. Starrett
|
|
D.
A. Starrett (President and CEO)
|
|||
Date
|
November
5, 2009
|
R.
J. Simkevich
|
|
R.
J. Simkevich (Principal Accounting
Officer)
|
17