STERICYCLE INC - Quarter Report: 2011 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011

or

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number 0-21229

Stericycle, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

28161 North Keith Drive

Lake Forest, Illinois 60045

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(847) 367-5910

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES  x    NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    YES  x    NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    YES  ¨    NO  x

As of August 1, 2011 there were 86,114,347 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding.

Table of Contents

Stericycle, Inc.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

PART I. – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

STERICYCLE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

1

Table of Contents

STERICYCLE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

2

Table of Contents

STERICYCLE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

STERICYCLE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 (Unaudited) and

Year Ended December 31, 2010 (Audited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

STERICYCLE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Unless the context requires otherwise, “we”, “us” or “our” refers to Stericycle, Inc. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. However, the Company believes the disclosures included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In our opinion, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation for the periods presented have been reflected and are of a normal recurring nature. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Stericycle, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for the entire year ending December 31, 2011.

There were no material changes in the Company’s critical accounting policies since the filing of its 2010 Form 10-K. As discussed in the 2010 Form 10-K, the preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the amount of reported assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and revenues and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results may differ from those estimates.

NOTE 2 – ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES

The following table summarizes the locations of our acquisitions for the six months ended June 30, 2011:

5

Table of Contents

During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, we completed nine acquisitions. Domestically, we acquired selected assets of three regulated waste businesses. Internationally, we acquired 100% of the stock of two regulated waste businesses in the UK and two regulated waste businesses in Romania, selected assets of a regulated waste business in Ireland, and 80% of the stock of a regulated waste business in Chile.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we completed 11 acquisitions. Domestically, we completed our stock acquisition of Healthcare Waste Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“HWS”). We also acquired selected assets of five regulated waste businesses and all of the assets of a compliance business. Internationally, we acquired 100% of the stock of regulated waste businesses in Argentina and Canada, 70% of the stock of a regulated waste business in Brazil, and selected assets of a regulated waste business in Romania. We also increased our majority share in a previous acquisition in Brazil from 70% to 82.5%.

The following table summarizes the aggregate purchase price paid for acquisitions and other adjustments of consideration to be paid on acquisitions during the six months ended June 30, 2011:

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we recognized $229.9 million in goodwill of which $216.6 million was assigned to our United States reporting segment and $13.3 million to our Foreign Countries reporting segment. Approximately $9.5 million of the goodwill recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2011 will be deductible for income taxes. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we recognized $70.1 million in intangible assets of which $64.1 million represents the estimated fair value of acquired customer relationships with amortizable lives of 15-40 years. The allocation of the acquisition price paid is preliminary pending completion of certain intangible asset valuations and completion accounts.

The following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocation for current period acquisitions and other adjustments to purchase price allocations during the six months ended June 30, 2011:

6

Table of Contents

For financial reporting purposes, our 2011 and 2010 acquisitions were accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. These acquisitions resulted in recognition of goodwill in our financial statements reflecting the premium paid to acquire businesses that we believe are complementary to our existing operations and fit our strategy. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company incurred $9.1 million and $1.4 million, respectively, of acquisition related expenses. These expenses are identified on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income as “acquisition expenses”. The purchase prices in excess of acquired tangible assets for these acquisitions have been primarily allocated to goodwill and other intangibles and are preliminary pending completion of certain intangible asset valuations.

NOTE 3 – NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Accounting Standards Recently Adopted

Revenue Recognition

On January 1, 2011, Stericycle adopted changes issued by the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) to guidance on revenue recognition for arrangements with multiple deliverables. This update allows companies to allocate consideration received for qualified separate deliverables using estimated selling price for both delivered and undelivered items when vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence is unavailable. Additional disclosures discussing the nature of multiple element arrangements, the types of deliverables under the arrangements, the general timing of their delivery, and significant factors and estimates used to determine estimated selling prices are required. This new guidance did not have a material impact to our financial statements.

Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Adopted

Other Comprehensive Income

In June 2011, the FASB issued changes to the presentation of comprehensive income. These changes give an entity the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements; the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity was eliminated. The items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income were not changed. Additionally, no changes were made to the calculation and presentation of earnings per share. These changes become effective for Stericycle on January 1, 2012. Other than the change in presentation, these changes will not have an impact on our financial statements.

7

Table of Contents

NOTE 4 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Fair value is the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is estimated by applying the following hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement:

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 – Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 – Inputs that are generally unobservable and typically reflect management’s estimate of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Level 1: At June 30, 2011, we have $38.2 million in cash and cash equivalents, $15.8 million in certificates of deposit, and $3.3 million in money market accounts, that we recorded at fair value using Level 1 inputs. At December 31, 2010, we had $77.1 million in cash and cash equivalents, $15.8 million in certificates of deposit, and $2.7 million in money market accounts. In 2010, we financed a portion of our Japan acquisition through local borrowings of ¥1.2 billion which required us to deposit the equivalent USD amount of $15.8 million in one year certificates of deposit with an affiliated bank located in the United States.

Level 2: We had no assets or liabilities measured at fair value using Level 2 inputs at June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010.

8

Table of Contents

Level 3: We had no assets or liabilities measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs at June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010.

Fair Value of Debt: At June 30, 2011, the fair value of the Company’s debt obligations was estimated at $1.240 billion compared to a carrying amount of $1.233 billion. At December 31, 2010, the fair value of the Company’s debt obligations was estimated at $1.105 billion, compared to a carrying amount of $1.103 billion. The fair values were estimated using market interest rates for comparable instruments. The Company has no current plans to retire a significant amount of its debt prior to maturity.

There were no movements of items between fair value hierarchies.

NOTE 5 – DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

At June 30, 2011, we had no derivative instruments.

NOTE 6 – INCOME TAXES

We and our subsidiaries file U.S. federal income tax returns and income tax returns in various states and foreign jurisdictions. With a few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state, local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2005.

The Company has recorded accruals to cover uncertain tax positions taken on previously filed tax returns. Such liabilities relate to additional taxes, interest and penalties the Company may be required to pay in various tax jurisdictions. During the course of examinations by various taxing authorities, proposed adjustments may be asserted. The Company evaluates such items on a case-by-case basis and adjusts the accrual for uncertain tax positions.

The total amount of unrecognized tax positions as of June 30, 2011 is $11.8 million, which includes interest and penalties and is reflected as a liability on the balance sheet. The amount of unrecognized tax positions that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate is approximately $11.8 million. We recognize interest and penalties accrued related to income tax reserves in income tax expense. This method of accounting is consistent with prior years.

The following table summarizes the changes in unrecognized tax positions during the six months ended June 30, 2011:

9

Table of Contents

NOTE 7 – STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

At June 30, 2011 we had stock options outstanding under the following plans:

The following table presents the total stock-based compensation expense resulting from stock option awards and the ESPP included in the condensed consolidated statements of income:

As of June 30, 2011, there was $33.6 million of total unrecognized compensation expense, related to non-vested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.92 years.

The following table sets forth the tax benefits related to stock compensation:

The Black-Scholes option-pricing model is used in determining the fair value of each option grant using the assumptions noted in the table below. The expected term of options granted is based on historical experience and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding. Expected volatility is based upon historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The expected dividend yield is zero. The risk-free interest rate is based upon the U.S. Treasury yield rates of a comparable period.

10

Table of Contents

The assumptions that we used in the Black-Scholes model are as follows:

The weighted average grant date fair value of the stock options granted during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was as follows:

Stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2011, was as follows: