STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. - Quarter Report: 2008 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
one)
S
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the
quarterly period ended: March 31, 2008
Or
£ TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the
transition period from___ to ___
Commission
file number 1-31993
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE
|
25-1655321
|
State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
20810
Fernbush Lane
|
|
Houston,
Texas
|
77073
|
(Address
of principal executive office)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code (281) 821-9091
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed from last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
R Yes £ No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See the definitions of
"large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company"
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer £
|
Accelerated
filer R
|
Non-accelerated
filer £ (Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
Smaller
reporting company £
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
£ Yes þ No
At May 1,
2008, there were 13,102,364 shares outstanding of the issuer’s common stock, par
value $0.01 per share
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3
|
|
3
|
|
7
|
|
12
|
|
19
|
|
19
|
|
19
|
|
19
|
|
19
|
|
19
|
|
20
|
|
21
|
PART I
Item
1 Condensed
Consolidated Unaudited Financial Statements
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts
in thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
March
31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 72,202 | $ | 80,649 | ||||
Short-term
investments
|
-- | 54 | ||||||
Contracts
receivable, including retainage
|
53,137 | 54,394 | ||||||
Costs
and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted
contracts
|
5,665 | 3,747 | ||||||
Inventories
|
1,294 | 1,239 | ||||||
Deferred
tax asset, net
|
1,088 | 1,088 | ||||||
Deposits
and other current assets
|
1,738 | 1,779 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
135,124 | 142,950 | ||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
73,433 | 72,389 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
57,232 | 57,232 | ||||||
Other
assets, net
|
1,860 | 1,944 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 267,649 | $ | 274,515 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 21,910 | $ | 27,190 | ||||
Billings
in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted
contracts
|
23,914 | 25,349 | ||||||
Current
maturities of long term obligations
|
90 | 98 | ||||||
Other
accrued expenses
|
8,413 | 8,250 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
54,327 | 60,887 | ||||||
Long-term
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Long-term
debt, net of current maturities
|
60,534 | 65,556 | ||||||
Deferred
tax liability, net
|
4,281 | 3,098 | ||||||
Minority
interest in RHB
|
6,580 | 6,362 | ||||||
71,395 | 75,016 | |||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
||||||||
Stockholders’
equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, par value $0.01 per share; authorized 1,000,000 shares ,
none issued
|
-- | -- | ||||||
Common
stock, par value $0.01 per share; authorized 14,000,000 shares, 13,099,364
and 13,006,502 shares issued
|
131 | 130 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
147,983 | 147,786 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(6,187 | ) | (9,304 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
141,927 | 138,612 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 267,649 | $ | 274,515 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Amounts
in thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
Three
months ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 84,926 | $ | 68,888 | ||||
Cost
of revenues
|
76,825 | 63,256 | ||||||
Gross
profit
|
8,101 | 5,632 | ||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
(3,447 | ) | (2,600 | ) | ||||
Other
income (expense)
|
(11 | ) | 308 | |||||
Operating
income
|
4,643 | 3,340 | ||||||
Interest
income
|
287 | 466 | ||||||
Interest
expense
|
(130 | ) | -- | |||||
Income
before income taxes and minority interest
|
4,800 | 3,806 | ||||||
Income
tax expense
|
(1,591 | ) | (1,295 | ) | ||||
Minority
interest in earnings of RHB
|
(92 | ) | -- | |||||
Net
income
|
$ | 3,117 | $ | 2,511 | ||||
Net
income per share:
|
||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 0.24 | $ | 0.23 | ||||
Diluted
|
$ | 0.23 | $ | 0.21 | ||||
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding used in computing
per share amounts:
|
||||||||
Basic
|
13,068,864 | 10,919,145 | ||||||
Diluted
|
13,684,249 | 11,774,690 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Amounts
in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Additional
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Paid-in
|
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Deficit
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
at January 1, 2008
|
13,007 | $ | 130 | $ | 147,786 | $ | (9,304 | ) | $ | 138,612 | ||||||||||
Net
income
|
-- | -- | -- | 3,117 | 3,117 | |||||||||||||||
Stock
issued upon option /warrant exercises
|
87 | 1 | 119 | -- | 120 | |||||||||||||||
Available
excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options
|
-- | -- | 116 | -- | 116 | |||||||||||||||
Expenditures
related to 2007 equity offering
|
-- | -- | (143 | ) | -- | (143 | ) | |||||||||||||
Issuance
and amortization of restricted stock
|
5 | 0 | 52 | -- | 52 | |||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
-- | -- | 53 | -- | 53 | |||||||||||||||
Balance
at March 31, 2008
|
13,099 | $ | 131 | $ | 147,983 | $ | (6,187 | ) | $ | 141,927 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts
in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three
months ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 3,117 | $ | 2,511 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile income from operations to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
3,285 | 2,451 | ||||||
Loss
(gain) on sale of property and equipment
|
11 | (271 | ) | |||||
Deferred
tax expense
|
1,183 | 1,295 | ||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
105 | 417 | ||||||
Excess
tax benefits from exercise of stock options
|
(116 | ) | -- | |||||
Interest
expense accreted on minority interest
|
126 | -- | ||||||
Minority
interest in net earnings of subsidiary
|
92 | -- | ||||||
Other
changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
(Increase)
decrease in contracts receivable
|
1,258 | (7,512 | ) | |||||
(Increase)
in costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted
contracts
|
(1,918 | ) | (1,284 | ) | ||||
(Increase)
in other current assets
|
(53 | ) | (668 | ) | ||||
Increase
(decrease) in accounts payable
|
(5,280 | ) | 5,804 | |||||
Increase (decrease)
in billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted
contracts
|
(1,434 | ) | 2,778 | |||||
Increase
(decrease) in other accrued expenses
|
280 | (961 | ) | |||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
656 | 4,560 | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Additions
to property and equipment
|
(4,467 | ) | (7,051 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale of property and equipment
|
188 | 716 | ||||||
Purchases
of short-term securities, available for sale
|
-- | (23,271 | ) | |||||
Sales
of short-term securities, available for sale
|
54 | 21,618 | ||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(4,225 | ) | (7,988 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Cumulative
daily drawdowns – Credit Facility
|
60,000 | 20,000 | ||||||
Cumulative
daily reductions – Credit Facility
|
(65,000 | ) | (30,000 | ) | ||||
Repayments
under long-term obligations
|
(31 | ) | (31 | ) | ||||
Payments
received on note receivable
|
60 | 77 | ||||||
Excess
tax benefits from exercise of stock options
|
116 | -- | ||||||
Issuance
of common stock pursuant to the exercise of options
|
120 | 69 | ||||||
Expenditures
related to 2007 equity offering
|
(143 | ) | -- | |||||
Net
cash used by financing activities
|
(4,878 | ) | (9,885 | ) | ||||
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(8,447 | ) | (13,313 | ) | ||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
80,649 | 28,466 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 72,202 | $ | 15,153 | ||||
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the period for interest
|
$ | 82 | $ | 12 | ||||
Cash
paid during the period for taxes
|
-- | $ | 90 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2008 (UNAUDITED)
1.
|
Basis
of Presentation
|
Sterling
Construction Company, Inc. (“Sterling” or “the Company”) is a leading heavy
civil construction company that specializes in the building, reconstruction and
repair of transportation and water infrastructure in large and growing markets
in Texas and Nevada. Our transportation infrastructure projects
include highways, roads, bridges and light rail, and our water infrastructure
projects include water, wastewater and storm drainage systems. We
provide general contracting services primarily to public sector clients
utilizing our own employees and equipment for activities including excavating,
paving, pipe installation, and asphalt and concrete placement. We
purchase the necessary materials for our contracts, perform approximately
three-quarters of the work required by our contracts with our own crews, and
generally engage subcontractors only for ancillary services.
Although
we describe our business in this report in terms of the services we provide, our
base of customers and the geographic areas in which we operate, we have
concluded that our operations comprise one reportable segment, heavy civil
construction, pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131 –
"Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information." In making this determination, we considered that each
project has similar characteristics, includes similar services, has similar
types of customers and is subject to the same regulatory
environment. We organize, evaluate and manage our financial
information around each project when making operating decisions and assessing
our overall performance.
The
condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared
by Sterling, without audit, in accordance with the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and should be read in conjunction with
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007. The condensed consolidated financial statements reflect, in the
opinion of management, all normal recurring adjustments necessary to present
fairly the Company’s financial position at March 31, 2008 and the results of
operations and cash flows for the periods presented. Certain
information and note disclosures prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles have been either condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC
rules and regulations. Interim results may be subject to significant
seasonal variations and the results of operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for
the full year.
The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
subsidiaries in which the Company has a greater than 50% ownership interest, and
all intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation. For all periods presented, the Company had no
subsidiaries with ownership interests less than 50%.
Certain
insignificant reclassifications of prior year amounts have been made to conform
to current year presentation.
2.
|
Critical
Accounting Policies
|
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Management’s estimates, judgments and
assumptions are continually evaluated based on available information and
experience; however, actual amounts could differ from those
estimates.
On an
ongoing basis, the Company evaluates the critical accounting policies used to
prepare its condensed consolidated financial statements, including, but not
limited to, those related to:
|
●
|
revenue
recognition
|
|
●
|
contracts
and retainage receivables
|
|
●
|
inventories
|
|
●
|
impairment
of long-term assets
|
|
●
|
income
taxes
|
|
●
|
self-insurance;
and
|
|
●
|
stock-based
compensation
|
The
Company’s significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 of
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. There have
been no material changes to such significant accounting policies.
3.
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
|
In
December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) revised Statement
of Accounting Standards No. 141, “Business Combinations” (SFAS
141(R)). This Statement establishes principles and requirements for
how the acquirer: (a) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling
interest in the acquiree; (b) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in
the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase and (c) determines
what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to
evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business
combination. Also, under SFAS 141(R), all direct costs of the
business combination must be charged to expense on the financial statements of
the acquirer at the time of acquisition. SFAS 141(R) revises previous
guidance as to the recording of post-combination restructuring plan costs by
requiring the acquirer to record such costs separately from the business
combination. This statement is effective for acquisitions occurring
on or after January 1, 2009, with early adoption not permitted. Unless the
Company enters into another business combination, there will be no effect on
future financial statements of SFAS 141(R) when adopted.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS 157) which establishes a framework for
measuring fair value and requires expanded disclosure about the information used
to measure fair value. The statement applies whenever other
statements require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value,
and does not expand the use of fair value accounting in any new
circumstances. In February 2008, the FASB delayed the effective date
by which companies must adopt certain provisions of SFAS 157 related to
non-financial assets and liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November
15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption
of this standard did not have a material impact on our financial position,
results of operations, or cash flows.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment to FASB Statement
No. 115 (“SFAS No. 159”). This statement allows a company to
irrevocably elect fair value as a measurement attribute for certain financial
assets and financial liabilities with changes in fair value recognized in the
results of operations. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and
disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies
that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and
liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. While the Company is required by other
generally accepted accounting principles to measure certain assets and
liabilities at fair value, it has elected not to apply the provisions of SFAS
No. 159.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Accounting Standards No. 160,
“Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements” (SFAS
160). SFAS 160 clarifies previous guidance on how consolidated
entities should account for and report non-controlling interests in consolidated
subsidiaries. The statement standardizes the presentation of
non-controlling ("minority interests") for both the consolidated balance sheet
and income statement. This Statement is effective for fiscal years
beginning on or after January 1, 2009, and all interim periods within that
fiscal year, with early adoption not permitted. While the Company is
currently assessing the impact of this SFAS on its financial statements, it
believes that when this Statement is adopted, the Minority Interest in RHB and
any similar subsequent acquisitions will be retrospectively reported as a
separate component of stockholders equity instead of a liability and net income
will be segregated between net income attributable to common stock-holders and
non-controlling interests.
4.
|
Cash
and Cash Equivalents and Short-term
Investments:
|
The
Company considers all highly liquid investments with original or remaining
maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash
equivalents. Included in cash and cash equivalents at March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 are uninsured temporary cash investments of $16.2 million and
$21.9 million, respectively, in money market funds stated at fair
value. Additionally, the Company maintains cash in bank deposit
accounts that at times, including March 31, 2008, may exceed federally insured
limits.
The
Company classifies any short-term investments (including auction-rate
securities) as securities available for sale in accordance with
SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities”. At March 31, 2008, the Company had no short-term securities
available for sale.
5.
|
Inventories
|
The
Company’s inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market as determined by
the average cost method. Inventories consist of raw materials, such
as broken concrete, millings, and quarried stone which are expected to be
utilized in construction projects in the future. The cost of
inventory includes labor, trucking and equipment costs.
6.
|
Property
and Equipment (in thousands)
|
March 31, 2008
|
December 31, 2007
|
|||||||
Construction
equipment
|
$ | 86,650 | $ | 83,739 | ||||
Transportation
equipment
|
9,884 | 9,279 | ||||||
Buildings
|
1,604 | 1,573 | ||||||
Office
equipment
|
611 | 602 | ||||||
Construction
in progress
|
1,134 | 856 | ||||||
Land
|
2,718 | 2,718 | ||||||
Water
rights
|
200 | 200 | ||||||
102,801 | 98,967 | |||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
(29,368 | ) | (26,578 | ) | ||||
$ | 73,433 | $ | 72,389 |
7.
|
Income
per Share
|
Basic net
income per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted
net income per common share is computed giving effect to all potentially
dilutive common stock options and warrants using the treasury stock
method. At March 31, 2008 and 2007, there were 82,500 and 81,300,
respectively, common stock options with a weighted average exercise price per
share of $24.90 and $25.02, respectively, which were excluded from the
calculation of diluted income per share as they were
anti-dilutive. The following table reconciles the numerators and
denominators of the basic and diluted net income per common share computations
for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively, (in
thousands, except per share data):
Three months ended March
31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Numerator:
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 3,117 | $ | 2,511 | ||||
Denominator:
|
||||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding – basic
|
13,069 | 10,919 | ||||||
Shares
for dilutive stock options, restricted stock andwarrants
|
615 | 856 | ||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding and assumedconversions –
diluted
|
13,684 | 11,775 | ||||||
Basic
earnings per common share:
|
$ | 0.24 | $ | 0.23 | ||||
Diluted
earnings per common share:
|
$ | 0.23 | $ | 0.21 |
8.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation Plans and Warrants
|
The
Company has five stock plans, only two of which currently have stock options
outstanding, which are administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board
of Directors. In general, the plans provide for all options to be issued with a
per-share exercise price equal to the fair market value of a share of common
stock on the date of grant. The original terms of the options
typically do not exceed 10 years. Stock options generally vest over a
three to five year period. Note 8 – Stock Options and Warrants of the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 should be referred to for
additional information regarding the stock-based incentive plans.
We
recorded compensation expense of $105,000 and $417,000 for the three-month
periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, (including $53,000 and
$35,000, respectively, related to restricted stock grants to independent
directors discussed below). Unrecognized compensation expense related
to stock options at March 31, 2008 and 2007 was $490,000 and $938,000,
respectively, to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately
2.3 years for both. Proceeds received by the Company from the
exercise of 87,190 options for the three months ended March 31, 2008 were
approximately $120,000. No options were granted in the three months
ended March 31, 2008 or March 31, 2007.
Unrecognized
compensation expense related to restricted stock awards at March 31, 2008 and
2007 was $120,000 and $23,000, respectively, to be recognized over a weighted
average period of 4.3 and 0.2 years. In May 2007, the six independent
directors of the Company were each granted 1,598 shares of restricted stock at
the market price on the date of grant, or $21.90, which will vest over one
year. In March 2008, five employees were granted an aggregated total
of 5,672 shares of restricted stock at $18.16 per share resulting in an expense
of $103,000 to be recognized ratably over the five year restriction
period.
At March
31, 2008, there were 456,306 shares covered by outstanding stock options and
356,266 shares covered by outstanding stock warrants.
9.
|
Income
Taxes
|
The
Company and its subsidiaries file consolidated income tax returns in the United
States federal jurisdiction and in various states. With few
exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to federal tax examinations for
years prior to 2002 and state income tax examinations for years prior to
2005. The Company’s policy is to recognize interest related to any
underpayment of taxes as interest expense, and penalties as administrative
expenses. No interest or penalties have been accrued at March 31,
2008 and 2007.
In its
2005 tax return, the Company used net operating tax loss carryforwards (“NOL”)
that would have expired during that year instead of deducting compensation
expense that originated in 2005 as the result of stock option
exercises. Whether the Company can choose not to take deductions for
compensation expense in the tax return and to instead use otherwise expiring
NOLs is considered by management to be an uncertain tax position. In
the event that the IRS examines the 2005 tax return and determines that the
compensation expense is a required deduction in the tax return, then the Company
would deduct the compensation expense instead of the NOL used in the period;
however there would be no cash impact on tax paid due to the increased
compensation deduction. In addition, there would be no interest or
penalties due as a result of the change. Based on the Company’s
detailed analysis, management has determined that it is more likely than not
this position will be sustained upon examination, and this uncertain tax
position was determined to have a measurement of $0.
The
decrease in the effective income tax rate to 33.1% of income before income taxes
and minority interest in the first three months of 2008 from 34.0% for the
comparable period in 2007 is a result of various miscellaneous permanent
differences offset by the Texas Margins tax effective since July 1,
2007.
10.
|
Acquisition
of Road and Highway Builders, LLC
|
On
October 31, 2007, the Company purchased a 91.67% interest in Road and Highway
Builders, LLC (“RHB”) and all of the outstanding capital stock of Road and
Highway Builders Inc. ("RHB Inc.") then an inactive Nevada
Corporation. The results of RHB and RHB Inc. are included in the
Company's consolidated results for the three months ended March 31, 2008 , but
not in the comparable period for 2007 as the acquisition was made after March
31, 2007.
RHB is a
heavy civil construction business located in Reno, Nevada that builds roads,
highways and bridges for state and local governmental agencies. Its
assets consist of construction contracts, road and bridge construction and
aggregate mining machinery and equipment, and land with
improvements. RHB Inc’s sole asset is its right as a co-lessee with
RHB under a long-term, royalty-based lease of a Nevada quarry on which RHB can
mine aggregates for use in its own construction business and for sale to third
parties. During the first quarter of 2008, RHB Inc. has begun
crushing stone for the operations of RHB.
The
Company paid an aggregate purchase price for the RHB entities of $53.0 million
to the sellers. Additionally, the Company incurred $1.1 million of
direct costs related to the acquisition. Ten percent of the purchase price has
been placed in escrow for eighteen months as security for any breach of
representations and warranties made by the sellers.
The
minority interest owner of RHB has the right to put, or require the Company to
buy, his remaining 8.33% interest in RHB and, concurrently, the Company has the
right to require that owner to sell his 8.33% interest to the Company, beginning
in 2011. The purchase price in each case is 8.33% of the product of
six times the simple average of RHB's income before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization for the calendar years 2008, 2009 and
2010. The minority interest was recorded at its estimated fair value
at the date of acquisition and the difference between the minority owner's
interest in the historical basis of RHB and the estimated fair value of that
interest was recorded as a liability to minority interest and a reduction in
additional paid-in-capital.
Any
changes to the estimated fair value of the minority interest will be recorded as
a corresponding change in additional paid-in-capital. Additionally,
interest expense ($126,000 in the first quarter of 2008) has been accreted to
the minority interest liability based on the discount rate used to calculate the
fair value of the put at the date of the acquisition.
The
following table summarizes the initial allocation of the purchase price,
including related direct acquisition costs for the RHB entities (in
thousands):
Tangible
assets acquired at estimated fair value, including approximately $10,000
of property, plant and equipment
|
$ | 19,334 | ||
Current
liabilities assumed
|
(9,686 | ) | ||
Goodwill
|
44,496 | |||
Total
|
$ | 54,144 |
The
goodwill is deductible for tax purposes over 15 years. The purchase
price allocation has not been finalized due to the short time period between the
acquisition date and the date of the financial statements and certain
evaluations currently being made related to the quarry lease. A
preliminary analysis of the assets acquired indicates that there are no
separately identifiable intangible assets. No material adjustments
have been made to the initial allocation of the purchase price; however, the
nature and the amount of any material adjustments ultimately made to such
initial allocation will be disclosed when determined. For more detail
regarding this acquisition, see Notes 13 and 15 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007.
11.
|
Subsequent
Events
|
On May 8, 2008, at the their annual
meetings, the Company’s stockholders approved an increase in the number of
shares of common stock that the Company is authorized to issue from 14 million
shares to 19 million shares and the Company’s board of directors granted,
pursuant to the compensation plan for non-employee directors, 2,564 shares of
restricted common stock to each of the six non-employee directors, which vest on
the day before the 2009 annual stockholders' meeting.
Item
2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward
Looking Statements
This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes certain statements that are, or may be
deemed to be, “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange
Act”). These forward-looking statements may be found throughout this
report, including in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations” and in “Risk Factors”, below and relate to
matters such as our industry, business strategy, goals and expectations
concerning our market position, contract backlog, future operations, margins,
profitability, capital expenditures, liquidity and capital resources and other
financial and operating information. We use the words “anticipate,”
“assume,” “believe,” “budget,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,”
“forecast,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “will,”
“future” and similar terms and phrases to identify forward-looking statements in
this report.
Forward-looking
statements reflect our current expectations regarding future events, results or
outcomes. These expectations may or may not be
realized. Some of these expectations may be based upon assumptions or
judgments that prove to be incorrect. In addition, our business and
operations involve numerous risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond
our control, which could result in our expectations not being realized or
otherwise could materially affect our financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows.
Actual
events, results and outcomes may differ materially from our expectations due to
a variety of factors. Although it is not possible to identify all of
these factors, they include, among others, the following:
|
·
|
changes
in general economic conditions or reductions in federal, state and local
government funding for infrastructure
services;
|
|
·
|
adverse
economic conditions in our markets in Texas and
Nevada;
|
|
·
|
delays
or difficulties related to the completion of our projects, including
additional costs, reductions in revenues or the payment of liquidated
damages;
|
|
·
|
actions
of suppliers, subcontractors, customers, competitors and others which are
beyond our control;
|
|
·
|
the
effects of estimates inherent in our percentage-of-completion accounting
policies;
|
|
·
|
cost
escalations associated with our fixed-unit-price
contracts;
|
|
·
|
our
dependence on a few significant
customers;
|
|
·
|
adverse
weather conditions; although we prepare our budgets and bid for contracts
based on historical rain and snowfall patterns, the incidence of rain and
snowfall may differ materially from these
expectations;
|
|
·
|
the
presence of competitors with greater financial resources and the impact of
competitive services and pricing;
and
|
|
·
|
our
ability to successfully identify, finance, complete and integrate
acquisitions.
|
Stockholders
and potential investors are urged to carefully consider these factors and the
other factors described under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 in evaluating any
forward-looking statements and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements. Although we believe that our plans,
intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by the forward-looking
statements that we make in this report are reasonable, we can provide no
assurance that such plans, intentions or expectations will be
achieved.
Any
forward-looking statements included in this report are made only as of the date
of this report, and we undertake no obligation to update any information
contained in this report or to publicly release the results of any revisions to
any forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or
circumstances that occur, or that we become aware of, after the date of this
report, except as may be required by applicable securities laws.
Overview
Sterling
Construction Company, Inc. (“Sterling” or “the Company”) operates in one
segment, heavy civil construction, through Texas Sterling Construction Company
Co., ("TSC") and Road and Highway Builders, LLC ("RHB") that specialize in the
building, reconstruction and repair of transportation and water infrastructure
in large and growing markets in Texas and Nevada. Our transportation
infrastructure projects include highways, roads, bridges and light rail, and our
water infrastructure projects include water, wastewater and storm drainage
systems. We provide general contracting services primarily to public
sector clients utilizing our own employees and equipment for activities
including excavating, paving, pipe installation and asphalt and concrete
placement. We purchase the necessary materials for our contracts,
perform approximately three-quarters of the work required by our contracts with
our own crews, and generally engage subcontractors only for ancillary
services.
As
described in Note 10, on October 31, 2007 the Company purchased a 91.67%
interest in RHB thereby expanding its construction activities to
Nevada.
For a
more detailed discussion of the Company's business, readers of this report are
urged to review Item 1, Business, of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Material
Changes in Financial Condition
At March
31, 2008, there had been no material changes in the Company’s financial
condition since December 31, 2007, as discussed in Item 7 of the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Results
of Operations
Three months ended March 31,
2008 compared with three months ended March 31, 2007
(dollar
amounts in thousands) (unaudited):
|
2008
|
2007
|
% change
|
|||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 84,926 | $ | 68,888 | 23.3 | % | ||||||
Gross
profit
|
8,101 | 5,632 | 43.9 | % | ||||||||
Gross
margin
|
9.5 | % | 8.2 | % | 15.9 | % | ||||||
General,
administrative and other expenses
|
3,458 | 2,292 | 50.9 | % | ||||||||
Operating
income
|
4,643 | 3,340 | 39.0 | % | ||||||||
Operating
margin
|
5.5 | % | 4.8 | % | 14.6 | % | ||||||
Interest
income, net
|
157 | 466 | (66.3 | %) | ||||||||
Income
before taxes and minority interest
|
4,800 | 3,806 | 26.1 | % | ||||||||
Income
taxes
|
1,591 | 1,295 | 22.9 | % | ||||||||
Minority
interest in earnings of RHB LLC
|
92 | -- |
Nm
|
|||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 3,117 | $ | 2,511 | 24.1 | % |
Revenues
Revenues
increased $16 million due to the inclusion of RHB in the consolidated results
for the first quarter of 2008 and an increase in volume in Texas as a result
of improved weather conditions in our Texas markets, and an increase
in crews and equipment since the prior year. Rainfall decreased an
average of 30% quarter over quarter in our Texas markets and we had a
year-over-year increase in the average number of employees of 19% and a total
increase of $33 million of equipment including that acquired with
RHB.
Backlog
At the
end of the first quarter of the current year, our backlog of construction
projects was $485 million, as compared to $450 million at December 31, 2007. The
backlog at March 31, 2008 includes approximately $100 million of backlog
applicable to RHB. At March 31, 2008, we included in backlog
approximately $48.3 million of contracts on which we were the apparent low
bidder and expect to be awarded the contracts, but as of the quarter end these
contracts had not been officially awarded. Historically, subsequent
non-award of such low bids has not had an adverse effect on the Company’s
backlog or financial condition.
Gross
profit
Gross
profit increased $2.5 million for the year-over-year comparison. This
was due to the RHB contribution in 2008 and better weather in Texas than last
year, which allowed our crews and equipment to be more productive.
General
and administrative expenses, net of other income
General
and administrative expenses, net, increased by $1.2 million primarily due to
higher compensation expense and the addition of RHB.
Operating income
Operating
income increased $1.3 million due to the factors discussed above regarding gross
profit and general and administrative expenses.
Interest income and
expense
Net
interest income is down $309,000 due to a decrease in interest rates and by the
imputed interest expense of $126,000 on the put related to the minority interest
in RHB.
Income
taxes
Our
effective income tax rate for the first quarter of 2008 was 33.1% compared to
34.0% for the first quarter of 2007. The decrease in the effective
tax rate is primarily due to various miscellaneous permanent differences
partially offset by the Texas Margins Tax.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash
Flows
The
following table sets forth our cash flows for the three months ended March 31,
2008 and March 31, 2007 (in thousands) (unaudited):
Three
months ended
|
||||||||
March
31
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 72,202 | $ | 15,153 | ||||
Net
cash provided by (used in):
|
||||||||
Operating
activities
|
656 | 4,560 | ||||||
Investing
activities
|
(4,225 | ) | (7,988 | ) | ||||
Financing
activities
|
(4,878 | ) | (9,885 | ) | ||||
Decrease
in cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | (8,447 | ) | $ | (13,313 | ) | ||
Capital
expenditures
|
$ | 4,467 | $ | 7,051 | ||||
Working
capital at end of period
|
$ | 80,797 | $ | 51,837 |
Operating
Activities
Significant
non-cash items included in operating activities are:
|
●
|
depreciation
and amortization, which for the first three months of the current year
totaled $3.3 million, an increase of $834,000 from last year, as a result
of the continued increase in the size of our construction fleet in recent
years and the RHB acquisition;
|
|
●
|
deferred
tax expense in 2008 and 2007 of $1.2 and $1.3 million,
respectively.
|
The
significant components of the changes in working capital are as
follows:
|
●
|
contracts
receivable decreased $1.2 million in the current year due to the timing of
billings to customers as compared to an increase of $7.5 million in
contract receivables last year, which was attributable to increased
revenue in the first quarter of 2007 versus the final quarter of 2006 and
to higher levels of customer
retentions;
|
|
●
|
cost
and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts
increased by $1.9 million this year due to the timing of billings to
customers as discussed above compared to last year’s increase of $1.3
million, which was principally due to the start up of several new
jobs;
|
|
●
|
billings
in excess of costs on uncompleted contracts decreased by $1.4 million this
year, compared with last year’s increase of $2.8 million. These
changes principally reflect fluctuations in the timing and amount of
mobilization payments received for the start-up of certain contracts with
the fluctuations in 2008 being partially offset by the seasonal increase
in billings on RHB's contracts in
progress;
|
|
●
|
trade
payables, which decreased by $5.3 million in the first three months of
this year, due to more timely payment of invoices and a lower volume of
materials that were purchased in March 2008 versus December
2007. Accounts payable increased $5.8 million in the first
three months of 2007 as a result of changes in the volume of materials and
sub-contractors in that period due to a change in the mix of contracts in
progress.
|
Investing
activities
Expenditures
for the replacement of certain equipment and to expand our construction fleet
and office facilities totaled $4.5 million in the first three months of 2008,
compared with a total of $7.1 million of equipment purchases in the same period
last year. Capital equipment is acquired as needed to support our
work crews and backlog and to replace retiring equipment. We plan to
continue the expansion of our equipment fleet over the remainder of the year, in
line with the growth in our revenues.
In the
final quarter of 2007, we had $54,000 invested in a money market account and
classified as a short-term investment. In the first quarter of 2008
we liquidated this investment and ceased investing surplus funds in short-term
investments due to the volatility in the credit markets and are currently
holding such surplus funds in cash and cash equivalents.
Financing
activities
Financing
activities in the first three months of 2008 reflect primarily a reduction of
$5.0 million in borrowings under our $75.0 million Credit Facility as compared
to a $10.0 million reduction in borrowings under the predecessor $35.0 million
credit facility in the first quarter of 2007. The amounts of
borrowings under the Credit Facility are based on the Company's expectations of
working capital requirements.
Liquidity
The level
of working capital for our construction business varies due to fluctuations
in:
|
·
|
customer
receivables and contract
retentions;
|
|
·
|
costs
and estimated earnings in excess of
billings;
|
|
·
|
billings
in excess of costs and estimated
earnings;
|
|
·
|
the
size and status of contract mobilization payments and progress
billings;
|
|
·
|
the
amounts owed to suppliers and
subcontractors.
|
Some of
these fluctuations can be significant.
The $1.4
million decrease in working capital at March 31, 2008 versus December 31, 2007
is due to the reduction in borrowings under our Credit Facility and purchases of
property and equipment partially offset by income before depreciation and
deferred income taxes for the quarter.
The
increase in our working capital at March 31, 2008 versus the March 31, 2007 was
due to earnings for the trailing 12 months, the proceeds of our public offering
in December 2007 and the increase in borrowings of $40.0 million under our
Credit Facility partially offset by our purchase of the RHB entities in October
2007 and capital expenditures during that twelve-month period.
The
Company believes that it has sufficient liquid financial resources, including
the unused portion of its Credit Facility, to fund its requirements for the next
twelve months of operations, including its bonding requirements and expects no
other material changes in its liquidity.
Sources
of Capital
In
addition to our cash balances and cash provided from operations, we use
borrowings under our Credit Facility with Comerica Bank to finance our capital
expenditures and working capital needs.
In
October 2007, we entered into a new Credit Facility with Comerica Bank which
matures October 31, 2012. The Credit Facility allows for borrowing of
up to $75.0 million and is secured by all assets of the Company, other than
proceeds and other rights under our construction contracts which are pledged to
our bond surety. At March 31, 2008, the aggregate borrowings
outstanding under the Credit Facility were $60.0 million, and the aggregate
amount of letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility was
$1.8 million, which reduces availability under the Credit
Facility. In addition, at March 31, 2008, we had cash and cash
equivalents of $72.2 million.
The
Credit Facility requires the payment of a quarterly commitment fee of 0.25% per
annum of the unused portion of the Credit Facility. At our election,
the loans under the new Credit Facility bear interest at either a LIBOR-based
interest rate or a prime-based interest rate. The average interest
rate on funds borrowed under the Credit Facility during the three months ended
March 31, 2008 was approximately 6.50%. The Credit Facility is
subject to our compliance with certain covenants, including financial covenants
at quarter-end relating to fixed charges, leverage, tangible net worth, asset
coverage and consolidated net losses. We were in compliance
with all of these covenants at March 31, 2008.
Inflation
We do not
believe that inflation has had a material impact on our financial results during
recent years, although increases in oil product prices have recently affected
the costs of operating our construction fleet, producing concrete and asphalt,
transporting materials and the purchase price of certain materials. Anticipated
cost increases, such as those discussed above, are considered in our bids to
customers on proposed new construction projects. Where we are the successful
bidder, we lock in the prices of most materials and services, other than oil
products, with our suppliers and subcontractors, thereby mitigating future price
increases. There can be no assurance, however, that continued price increases in
oil products used in our business will be adequately covered by the estimated
escalation we have included in our bids or that other commodity suppliers will
continue to fix their prices for the duration of future projects.
Construction
Markets
We
operate in the heavy civil construction segment for infrastructure projects in
Texas and Nevada, specializing in transportation and water infrastructure.
Demand for this infrastructure depends on a variety of factors, including
overall population growth, economic expansion and the vitality of the market
areas in which we operate, as well as unique local topographical, structural and
environmental issues. In addition to these factors, demand for the replacement
of infrastructure is driven by the general aging of infrastructure and the need
for technical improvements to achieve more efficient or safer use of
infrastructure and resources. Funding for this infrastructure depends on
Federal, state and local authorizations.
According
to the 2006 census, Texas is the second largest state in population in the U.S.
with 23.5 million people and a population growth of 12.7% since 2000, almost
double the 6.4% growth rate for the U.S. as a whole over the same period. Three
of the largest 10 cities in the U.S. are located in Texas and we have operating
divisions in each of those cities: Houston, Dallas/Ft. Worth and San Antonio.
Nevada has undergone even more rapid growth, with the state’s population
expanding 24.9% since 2000 to 2.5 million people in 2006.
Our
highway and bridge work is generally funded through federal and state
authorizations. The federal government enacted the SAFETEA-LU bill, which
authorized $286 billion for transportation spending through 2009. Of this total,
the Texas Department of Transportation (“TXDOT”) and the Nevada Department of
Transportation (“NDOT”) were originally allocated approximately $14.5 billion
and $1.3 billion, respectively, over the five years of the authorization. Actual
SAFETEA-LU appropriations have been somewhat reduced from the original
allocations. While recent public statements by TXDOT officials indicate
potential TXDOT funding shortfalls and reductions in spending, transportation
leaders have identified $188 billion in needed construction projects to create
an acceptable transportation system in Texas by 2030. NDOT
expenditures totaled $740 million in 2006 and have had an annual increase of
9.9% since 2001.
Our water
and wastewater, underground utility, light-rail transit and non-highway paving
work is generally funded by municipalities and other local authorities. While
the size and growth rates of these markets is difficult to compute as a whole,
given the number of municipalities, the differences in funding sources and
variations in local budgets, management estimates that the municipal markets in
which we could potentially do business are in excess of $1 billion
annually.
While our
business does not include residential infrastructure work, the slow-down in
housing demand nationally, and to a lesser extent in Texas, has caused a softer
bidding climate in our water infrastructure markets and has caused some
residential infrastructure contractors to bid on transportation and water
infrastructure projects, thus increasing competition and creating downward
pressure on bid prices.
As
discussed above, our backlog of construction projects was $485 million at March
31, 2008, including $389 million that we estimate will be completed by December
31, 2008, versus backlog of $450 million at December 31, 2007—this increase in
backlog is after recognizing revenues earned of $85 million in the first quarter
of 2008.
To date
this year, the Company has had only one project scope reduction as a result of
reduced funding authorization and the amount of such scope reduction was not
material to our backlog. The Company had no project cancellations for
any reason. The current bidding climate various somewhat by locality
with the Dallas and San Antonio regions being stronger than the Houston and
Nevada regions. We continue, however, to bid projects that
fit our expertise and criteria for potential revenues and gross margins and,
while some of our markets are softer and more competitive, management believes
the Company has the resources and experience to continue to compete successfully
for available projects.
Item
3. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosure about
Market Risk
Changes
in interest rates are our primary sources of market risk. At March
31, 2008, $60 million of our outstanding indebtedness was at floating
rates. An increase of 1% in the market rate of interest would have
increased our interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2008 by
approximately $5,000.
Because
we derive no revenues from foreign countries and have no obligations in foreign
currency, we experience no direct foreign currency exchange rate
risk. However, prices of certain raw materials, construction
equipment and consumables, such as oil, steel and cement, may be affected by
currency fluctuations.
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure
controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the
reports that it files or submits under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including the
principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing
similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
The
Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer reviewed
and evaluated the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934). Based on that evaluation, the Company’s principal executive
officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure
controls and procedures were effective at March 31, 2008 to ensure that the
information required to be disclosed by the Company in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms
and is accumulated and communicated to the Company's
management including the principal executive and financial officers, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosures.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
There
were no changes during the quarter ended March 31, 2008 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal
controls over financial reporting.
Inherent
Limitations on Effectiveness of
Controls
Internal
controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all errors and all
fraud. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness of
internal controls to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
PART
II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
The
Company is not a party to any material legal proceedings.
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
There
have not been any material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in
Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2007.
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
|
None
Item
3.
|
Defaults
upon Senior Securities
|
None
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders
|
None
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
None
Item
6.
|
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Patrick T. Manning, Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 13a-14(a)
|
31.2
|
Certification
of James H. Allen, Jr., Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 13a-14(a)
|
32.0
|
Certification
of Patrick T. Manning, Chief Executive Officer and James H. Allen, Jr.,
Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002)
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
|
||
Date: May
12, 2008
|
By:
|
/s/ Patrick T.
Manning.
|
Patrick
T. Manning.
|
||
Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
|
||
Date: May
12, 2008
|
By:
|
/s/ James H. Allen,
Jr.
|
James
H. Allen, Jr.
|
||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
STERLING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,
INC..
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
Period Ended March 31, 2008
Exhibit Index
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
Certification
by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
Certification
by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
Certification
of Periodic Financial Report by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
*Filed
herewith
22