STONERIDGE INC - Quarter Report: 2014 September (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarter ended September 30, 2014

Commission file number: 001-13337

STONERIDGE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

xYes ¨No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

xYes ¨No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ¨Yes xNo

The number of Common Shares, without par value, outstanding as of October 31, 2014 was 28,220,916.

STONERIDGE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES 

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

The Company has combined comprehensive income (loss) from continuing operations and comprehensive loss from discontinued operations herein.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

The Company has combined cash flows from continuing operations and cash flows from discontinued operations within the operating, investing and financing categories.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)

(Unaudited)

(1) Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Stoneridge, Inc. (the “Company”) without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The information furnished in the condensed consolidated financial statements includes normal recurring adjustments and reflects all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of such financial statements. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the SEC's rules and regulations. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, it is suggested that these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company's 2013 Form 10-K. 

During the second quarter of 2014, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement to divest its Wiring business including substantially all of its assets and liabilities. The sale was completed on August 1, 2014. See Note 3 for additional details. The Wiring business is classified as discontinued operations in accordance with the applicable accounting standards for all periods presented in the Company’s financial statements. Therefore, the Wiring business is excluded from both continuing operations and segment results for all periods presented. All previously reported financial information has been revised to conform to the current presentation. The Wiring business designed and manufactured wiring harness products and assembled instruments panels for sale principally to the commercial, agricultural and off-highway vehicle markets.

(2)  Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Accounting Standards Adopted

In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting standard update (“ASU”) No. 2013-11, “Income Taxes (Topic 740)”, which requires entities to present in the financial statements an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward except to the extent such items are not available or not intended to be used at the reporting date to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position. In such instances, the unrecognized tax benefit is required to be presented in the financial statements as a liability and not be combined with deferred tax assets. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013. This ASU was adopted on January 1, 2014 which did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In April 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360)”, which amends the definition of a discontinued operation in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 205-20 and requires entities to provide additional disclosures about discontinued operations as well as disposal transactions that do not meet the discontinued-operations criteria. The new standard changes the definition of a discontinued operation and requires discontinued operations treatment for disposals of a component or group of components that represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major impact on an entity’s operations or financial results. This ASU is effective prospectively for all disposals (except disposals classified as held for sale before the adoption date) or components initially classified as held for sale in periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted the standard in May 2014 and has applied it prospectively to new disposals and new classifications of disposal groups as held for sale including the Wiring business.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)

(Unaudited)

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”, which clarifies existing accounting literature relating to how and when a company recognizes revenue. Under ASU 2014-09, a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. This standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2016. As such, the Company will adopt this standard in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company is in the process of determining the impact, if any, the adoption of this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

(3) Discontinued Operations

Wiring Business

On May 26, 2014, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement to sell substantially all of the assets and liabilities of the former Wiring segment to Motherson Sumi Systems Ltd., an India-based manufacturer of diversified products for the global automotive industry and a limited company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of India, and MSSL (GB) LIMITED, a limited company incorporated under the laws of the United Kingdom (collectively, “Motherson”), for $65,700 in cash and the assumption of certain related liabilities of the Wiring business.

On August 1, 2014, the Company completed the sale of substantially all of the assets and liabilities of its Wiring business to Motherson for $71,386 in cash that consisted of the stated purchase price and estimated working capital on the closing date. The final purchase price is subject to post-closing working capital and other adjustments which may impact the amount of the loss on disposal. Any disputes regarding the working capital and other adjustments that are not amicably resolved between the Company and Motherson will be subject to determination by an independent accountant.

Certain of the Company’s debt agreements contain restrictions on the usage of funds received from the sale of assets. The proceeds received from the sale of the Wiring business are subject to these restrictions which generally require such cash to be used for the repayment of debt or other qualifying expenditures. At September 30, 2014, the Company’s restricted cash balance was $52,692. These restricted funds were subsequently used as part of the redemption of the senior secured notes on October 15, 2014. See Note 8 for additional details.

The Company recorded an estimated loss on disposal, net of tax of $1,233 at June 30, 2014 to adjust the carrying value of the Wiring assets to their estimated fair value less cost to sell, based on the terms of the agreement and transaction costs of $233 in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2014.

The Company recorded a loss on disposal, net of tax of $6,548 and $7,781 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014. The loss on disposal for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 included the recognition of previously deferred foreign currency translation of $2,734, income tax on the sale of Wiring’s Mexican businesses of $1,621 and transaction costs of $1,274.

The Company also entered into short-term transition services agreements with Motherson expected to conclude in the first quarter of 2015 associated with information systems, accounting, administrative, occupancy and support services as well as contract manufacturing and production support in Estonia and China.

The Company’s Electronics segment had post-disposition sales (August 1, 2014 through September 30, 2014) to the Wiring business acquired by Motherson of $5,244 for the three months ended September 30, 2014. Post-disposition purchases by the Company’s Electronics segment from the Wiring business acquired by Motherson were $587 for the three months ended September 30, 2014.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)

(Unaudited)

The following tables display summarized activity in our condensed consolidated statements of operations for discontinued operations during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, related to the Wiring business.

Intercompany sales to Wiring were $2,158 and $6,552 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $17,448 and $19,953 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Intercompany purchases from Wiring were $481 and $2,041 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $4,025 and $5,842 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)

(Unaudited)

The following table displays a summary of the Wiring assets and liabilities held for sale as of December 31, 2013.

(4) Goodwill

The Company conducts its annual goodwill impairment test for its majority owned subsidiary, PST Eletrônica Ltda. (“PST”) on October 1, and did so in 2013 without a need to expand the impairment test to “step two” of ASC 350 as PST’s calculated fair value exceeded its carrying value by approximately 10.0% and no indicators of impairment were identified as disclosed in the Company’s 2013 Form 10-K.

During the second quarter of 2014, however, indicators of potential impairment required the Company to conduct an interim impairment test. Those indicators included a decline in recent operating results and lower growth expectations primarily due to the weakening of the Brazilian economy and automotive market. In accordance with ASC 350, the Company completed “step one” of the impairment analysis and concluded that, as of June 30, 2014, the fair value of the PST reportable segment was below its carrying value, including goodwill. As a result, “step two” of the impairment test was initiated in accordance with ASC 350. Due to its time intensive nature, the “step two” analysis was not completed until the third quarter ended September 30, 2014. In accordance with ASC 350, the Company recorded its best estimate of $29,300 as a non-cash goodwill impairment charge (of which $6,436 was attributable to noncontrolling interest) as of June 30, 2014 which was included in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Based on the Company’s completed “step two” analysis in the third quarter of 2014, the final goodwill impairment as of June 30, 2014 was $23,498 (of which $5,162 was attributable to noncontrolling interest). As such, the Company recorded an adjustment to reduce the goodwill impairment by $5,802 (of which $1,274 was attributable to noncontrolling interest) as of September 30, 2014 which was included in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2014.

The fair value measurement of the reporting unit under the “step one” analysis and the “step two” analysis (a non-recurring fair value measure) in their entirety are classified as Level 3 inputs. The estimates and assumptions underlying the fair value calculations used in the Company's impairment test are uncertain by their nature and can vary significantly from actual results. Factors that management must estimate include, but are not limited to, industry and market conditions, sales volume and pricing, raw material costs, capital expenditures, working capital changes, cost of capital, debt-equity mix and tax rates. The estimates and assumptions that most significantly affect the fair value calculation are sales volume and the associated cash flow assumptions, market growth and weighted average cost of capital. The estimates and assumptions used in the estimate of fair value are consistent with those the Company uses in its internal planning.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)

(Unaudited)

The “step two” of the PST goodwill impairment test utilized the following methodologies in determining fair value. Buildings and machinery were valued at an estimated replacement cost for an asset of comparable age and condition. PST finite lived identified intangible assets are customer relationships, tradenames and technology. Customer relationships were valued using an excess earnings method, using various inputs such as the estimated customer attrition rate, future earnings forecast, the amount of contributory asset charges, and a discount rate. Tradenames and technology intangibles are valued using a relief from royalty method, which is based upon comparable market royalty rates for tradenames of similar value. Other working capital items are generally recorded at carrying value, unless there were known conditions that would impact the ultimate settlement amount of a particular item.

Because the PST goodwill impairment analysis is sensitive to the Brazilian economy and automotive market, the Company will continue to monitor key assumptions and other factors utilized in the PST goodwill impairment evaluation. If the assumptions and estimates including, but not limited to, the Brazilian economy and automotive market change in an unfavorable manner, additional goodwill impairment may be recognized.

The change in the carrying amount of goodwill is as follows:

(5) Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (using either the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) or average cost methods) or market. The Company evaluates and adjusts as necessary its excess and obsolescence reserve at a minimum on a quarterly basis. Excess inventories are quantities of items that exceed anticipated sales or usage for a reasonable period. The Company has guidelines for calculating provisions for excess inventories based on the number of months of inventories on hand compared to anticipated sales or usage. Management uses its judgment to forecast sales or usage and to determine what constitutes a reasonable period.

Inventory cost includes material, labor and overhead. Inventories consisted of the following:

Inventory valued using the FIFO method was $40,520 and $33,220 at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. Inventory valued using the average cost method was $45,667 and $46,308 at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)

(Unaudited)

(6) Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements

Financial Instruments

A financial instrument is cash or a contract that imposes an obligation to deliver, or conveys a right to receive cash or another financial instrument. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable are considered to be representative of fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. The estimated fair value of the Company's senior secured notes (fixed rate debt) with a face value of $157,500 and $175,000 at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $165,500 and $190,100, respectively, and was determined using market quotes classified as Level 2 input within the fair value hierarchy.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

On September 30, 2014, the Company had open foreign currency forward contracts, fixed price commodity contracts and an interest rate swap. These contracts are used solely for hedging and not for speculative purposes. Management believes that its use of these instruments to reduce risk is in the Company's best interest.  The counterparties to these financial instruments are financial institutions with investment grade credit ratings.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

The Company conducts business internationally and therefore is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk. The Company uses derivative financial instruments as cash flow and fair value hedges to mitigate its exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates by reducing the effect of such fluctuations on foreign currency denominated intercompany transactions and other foreign currency exposures. The currencies hedged by the Company during 2014 and 2013 include the euro and Mexican peso.

In certain instances, the foreign currency forward contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting or are not designated as hedges, and therefore are marked-to-market with gains and losses recognized in the Company's condensed consolidated statement of operations as a component of other expense, net.

The Company's foreign currency forward contracts offset a portion of the gains and losses on the underlying foreign currency denominated transactions as follows:

Euro-denominated Foreign Currency Forward Contract

As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company held a foreign currency forward contract with underlying notional amounts of $3,532 and $13,335, respectively, to reduce the exposure related to the Company's euro-denominated intercompany loans. This contract expires in December 2014. The euro-denominated foreign currency forward contract was not designated as a hedging instrument. For the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company recognized a gain of $1,064 and a loss of $489, respectively, in the condensed consolidated statement of operations as a component of other expense, net related to the euro-denominated contract. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company recognized a gain of $1,089 and a loss of $655, respectively, related to this contract.

Mexican peso-denominated Foreign Currency Forward Contracts – Cash Flow Hedge

The Company holds Mexican peso-denominated foreign currency forward contracts with underlying notional amounts at September 30, 2014 totaling $4,500 which expire ratably on a monthly basis from October through December 2014, compared to $45,000 at December 31, 2013. 

These contracts were executed to hedge forecasted transactions and are accounted for as cash flow hedges. As such, the effective portion of the unrealized gain or loss is deferred and reported in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. The cash flow hedges were highly effective and the Company expects them to remain highly effective in future periods. The effectiveness of the transactions has been and will be measured on an ongoing basis using regression analysis and forecasted future Mexican peso purchases.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)

(Unaudited)

As a result of the sale of the Wiring business, the Company forecasted that it would purchase Mexican pesos to fulfill only two of the five hedge contracts outstanding as of June 30, 2014 for the period October 2014 through December 2014. As the purchase of Mexican pesos related to three of the five hedge contracts was not probable, these three hedges attributed to the Wiring business were de-designated as of June 30, 2014 and the associated unrecognized $320 gain at that date was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss and recorded in discontinued operations in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations in the period of de-designation. On August 4, 2014, the three de-designated hedges were terminated and settled resulting in a nominal gain.

Commodity Price Risk - Cash Flow Hedge

To mitigate the risk of future price volatility and, consequently, fluctuations in gross margins, the Company entered into fixed price commodity contracts with a financial institution to fix the cost of a portion of the Company’s copper purchases as copper is a raw material used in the Company’s products.

The Company has fixed price commodity contracts at September 30, 2014 with an aggregate notional amount of 781 pounds, which expire on a monthly basis over the period from October 2014 through March 2015, compared to an aggregate notional amount of 1,582 pounds at December 31, 2013. 

All of these contracts represent a portion of the Company’s forecasted copper purchases. These contracts were executed to hedge a portion of forecasted transactions and the contracts are accounted for as cash flow hedges. The unrealized gain or loss for the effective portion of the hedges is deferred and reported in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss while the ineffective portion, if any, is reported in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The effectiveness of the transactions is measured on an ongoing basis using regression analysis and forecasted future copper purchases. Based upon the results of the regression analysis, the Company has concluded that these cash flow hedges are highly effective.

The Company evaluated the effectiveness of the copper fixed price commodity contracts at each reporting date in 2014. As a result of the sale of the Wiring business, the Company forecasted that it would not purchase the quantities of copper to fulfill these hedge contracts for the period October 2014 through March 2015. As the purchase of copper quantities related to these hedge contracts was not probable, the contracts primarily associated with the Wiring segment not expected to be fulfilled were de-designated at June 30, 2014 with the associated unrecognized $77 gain reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss and recorded in discontinued operations in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations in the period of de-designation.

Interest Rate Risk - Fair Value Hedge

The Company has a fixed-to-floating interest rate swap agreement (the “Swap”) with a notional amount of $45,000 to hedge its exposure to fair value fluctuations on a portion of its senior notes. The Swap was designated as a fair value hedge of the fixed interest rate obligation under the Company's $175,000 9.5% senior notes due October 15, 2017. The critical terms of the Swap are aligned with the terms of the senior notes, including maturity of October 15, 2017, resulting in no hedge ineffectiveness. The unrealized gain or loss for the effective portion of the hedge has been deferred and reported in the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets as an asset or liability as applicable, with the offset to the carrying value of the senior secured notes.

Under the Swap, the Company pays a variable interest rate equal to the six-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 7.2% and it receives a fixed interest rate of 9.5%. The Swap requires semi-annual settlements on April 15 and October 15. The difference between amounts to be received and paid under the Swap is recognized as a component of interest expense, net on the condensed consolidated statements of operations. 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)

(Unaudited)

Due to the Company’s notice of redemption issued on September 15, 2014 to redeem all remaining outstanding senior notes, the fair value interest rate hedge was de-designated. On October 23, 2014, the Company terminated the interest rate swap resulting in a gain of approximately $371 in the fourth quarter of 2014.

The Swap reduced interest expense by $194 and $222 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and by $625 and $644 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

The notional amounts and fair values of derivative instruments in the condensed consolidated balance sheets were as follows: 

Amounts recorded for the cash flow hedges in other comprehensive income (loss) and in net income (loss) for the three months ended September 30 are as follows: 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)

(Unaudited)

Amounts recorded for the cash flow hedges in other comprehensive income (loss) and in net income (loss) for the nine months ended September 30 are as follows: 

Gains and losses reclassified from other comprehensive income (loss) into net income (loss) were recognized in cost of goods sold in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The net deferred loss of $138 on the cash flow hedge derivatives will be reclassified from other comprehensive income (loss) to the condensed consolidated statements of operations through December 2014.  

Fair Value Measurements

The following table presents our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and are categorized using the three levels of the fair value hierarchy based on the reliability of the inputs used.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)

(Unaudited)

(7) Share-Based Compensation

Total compensation expense for share-based compensation arrangements recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of operations as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses was $1,499 and $1,419 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, total compensation expense recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for share-based compensation arrangements was $3,799 and $4,142, respectively. 

(8) Debt

Debt consisted of the following at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

Revolving Credit Facility

On November 2, 2007, the Company entered into an asset-based credit facility, which permits borrowing up to a maximum level of $100,000. The Company entered into an Amended and Restated Credit and Security Agreement and a Second Amended and Restated Credit and Security Agreement on September 20, 2010 and December 1, 2011, respectively.

On September 12, 2014, the Company entered into a Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amended Agreement”). The Amended Agreement provides for a $300,000 revolving credit facility, which replaces the Company’s existing $100,000 asset-based credit facility and includes a letter of credit subfacility, swing line subfacility and multicurrency subfacility. The amended revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) also has an accordion feature which allows the Company to increase the availability by up to $80,000 upon the satisfaction of certain conditions. The Amended Agreement extends the termination date of the Company’s Credit Facility to September 12, 2019 from December 1, 2016. In the third quarter of 2014, the Company capitalized $1,499 of deferred financing costs and recognized a $100 loss on extinguishment of previously recorded deferred financing costs associated with the Amended Agreement.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)

(Unaudited)

Borrowings under the Amended Agreement will bear interest at either the Base Rate, as defined, or the LIBOR Rate, at the Company’s option, plus the applicable margin as set forth in the Amended Agreement. The Amended Agreement contains certain financial covenants that require the Company to maintain less than a maximum leverage ratio and more than a minimum interest coverage ratio. The Amended Agreement also contains affirmative and negative covenants and events of default that are customary for credit arrangements of this type including covenants which place restrictions and/or limitations on the Company’s ability to borrow money, make capital expenditures and pay dividends. There were no borrowings outstanding on the credit facilities at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

The Company was in compliance with all credit facility covenants at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Debt

On October 4, 2010, the Company issued $175,000 of senior secured notes which bear interest at an annual rate of 9.5% and mature on October 15, 2017. The senior secured notes were issued to the original purchasers at a 2.5% discount for which the remaining balance at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $2,043 and $2,732, respectively. Interest payments are payable on April 15 and October 15 of each year.

On September 2, 2014, the Company redeemed $17,500, or 10.0%, of its senior secured notes at a price of 103.0% of the principal amount. As a result of the redemption, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $820 in the third quarter of 2014, which includes a premium of $525 and the acceleration of both the remaining deferred financing costs and original issue discount.

On October 15, 2014, the Company redeemed the remaining $157,500 of its 9.5% senior secured notes at a price of 104.75% of the principal amount discharging the corresponding senior notes indenture. As a result of the redemption, the Company will recognize a loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately $9,700 in the fourth quarter of 2014, which includes a premium of $7,481 and the acceleration of the remaining deferred financing costs, original issue discount and de-designation date unrecognized gain on the interest rate swap. The senior secured notes were redeemed using funds from borrowing $100,000 under the Credit Facility as well as restricted cash.

The senior secured notes indenture limited the amount of the Company and its restricted subsidiaries' indebtedness, restricted certain payments and included various other non-financial restrictive covenants. The senior secured notes were guaranteed by all of the Company's existing domestic restricted subsidiaries. All other restricted subsidiaries that may guarantee any indebtedness of the Company or the guarantors also guaranteed the senior secured notes.

PST maintains several short-term and long-term notes used for working capital purposes including a new term loan (the “PST note”) entered into on July 1, 2014 for 11,203 Brazilian real which had a U.S. dollar equivalent outstanding balance of $4,637 at September 30, 2014. The PST note matures on July 15, 2017 with interest payable quarterly at a fixed annual interest rate of 8.0%. PST’s other short-term and long-term notes also have fixed interest rates. The weighted-average interest rates of short-term and long-term debt of PST at September 30, 2014 were 11.7% and 5.7%, respectively.  Depending on the specific note, interest is payable either monthly or annually. The PST notes at September 30, 2014 mature as follows: $15,474 in 2014, $2,186 in 2015, $4,405 in 2016, $2,383 in 2017 and approximately $1,010 annually in 2018 and 2019. 

On February 25, 2014, the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary located in Suzhou, China entered into a term loan for 9,000 Chinese yuan (the “Suzhou note”) which matured in August 2014. The U.S. dollar equivalent outstanding loan balance was $1,487 at December 31, 2013, with interest payable quarterly at 125.0% of the one-year lending rate published by The People's Bank of China, which was 7.0%.

The Company was in compliance with all note covenants at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

The Company's wholly-owned subsidiary located in Stockholm, Sweden, has an overdraft credit line which allows overdrafts on the subsidiary's bank account up to a maximum level of 20,000 Swedish krona, or $2,773 and $3,107, at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there was no balance outstanding on this bank account.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)

(Unaudited)

(9) Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share was computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of Common Shares outstanding for each respective period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share was calculated by dividing net income (loss) attributable to Stoneridge, Inc. by the weighted-average of all potentially dilutive Common Shares that were outstanding during the periods presented.  However, for all periods in which the Company recognized a net loss from continuing operations, the Company did not recognize the effect of the potential dilutive securities as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

Weighted-average Common Shares outstanding used in calculating basic and diluted net income (loss) per share were as follows:

There were no outstanding options at September 30, 2014. At September 30, 2013, options not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share to purchase 20,000 Common Shares at an average price of $15.73 per share were outstanding. These outstanding options were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because their respective exercise prices were greater than the average closing market price of Company Common Shares and the effect would be anti-dilutive.

There were 466,650 and 663,750 performance-based restricted Common Shares outstanding at September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. There were also 374,400 performance-based right to receive Common Shares outstanding at September 30, 2014. These restricted and right to receive Common Shares were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because all vesting conditions have not been achieved as of September 30, 2014 and 2013. These shares may become dilutive based on the Company’s ability to meet or exceed future performance targets.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)

(Unaudited)

(10) Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss by Component

Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)

(Unaudited)

(11)  Commitments and Contingencies

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to a broad range of claims and legal proceedings that relate to contractual allegations, tax audits, patent infringement, product liability, employment-related matters and environmental matters. Although it is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome of these matters, the Company is of the opinion that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse affect on its consolidated results of operations or financial position.

As a result of environmental studies performed at the Company’s former facility located in Sarasota, Florida, the Company became aware of soil and groundwater contamination at the Company site. The Company engaged an environmental engineering consultant to assess the level of contamination and to develop a remediation and monitoring plan for the site. Soil remediation at the site was completed during the year ended December 31, 2010. Ground water remediation will begin in the first quarter of 2015, as the remedial action plan has been approved by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, environmental remediation costs incurred were immaterial. At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had accrued an undiscounted liability of $944 related to future remediation. At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, $431 and $683, respectively, was recorded as a component of accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets while the remaining amount was recorded as a component of other long-term liabilities. A majority of the costs associated with the recorded liability will be incurred at the start of the groundwater remediation, with the balance relating to monitoring costs to be incurred over multiple years. Although the Company sold the Sarasota facility and related property in December 2011, the liability to remediate the site contamination remains the responsibility of the Company. Due to the ongoing site remediation, the closing terms of the sale agreement included a requirement for the Company to maintain a $2,000 letter of credit for the benefit of the buyer.

In September 2013, a legal proceeding was initiated by Actia Automotive (“Actia”) in a French court (the tribunal de grande instance de Paris) alleging infringement of its patents by the Company’s Electronics segment. Actia is seeking injunctive relief and monetary damages of approximately $19,000 resulting from such alleged infringement. The Company believes that its products did not infringe on any of the patents claimed by Actia, and the claim is without merit. Therefore it is vigorously defending itself against these allegations. The Company believes the likelihood of loss is not probable. As such, no liability has been recorded for this claim. There have been no significant changes to the facts and circumstances related to this claim for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014.

On May 24, 2013, the State Revenue Services of São Paulo issued a tax deficiency notice against PST, our 74% owned consolidated subsidiary, claiming that the vehicle tracking and monitoring services it provides should be classified as communication services, and therefore subject to the State Value Added Tax – ICMS. The State Revenue Services assessment imposed the 25.0% ICMS tax on all revenues of PST related to the vehicle tracking and monitoring services rendered during the period from January 2009 through December 2010. The Brazilian real (“R$”) and U.S. dollar equivalent (“$”) of the aggregate tax assessment is approximately R$92,500 ($37,700) which is comprised of Value Added Tax – ICMS of R$13,200 ($5,400), interest of R$11,400 ($4,600) and penalties of R$67,900 ($27,700).

The Company believes that the vehicle tracking and monitoring services are non-communication services, as defined under Brazilian tax law, subject to the municipal ISS tax, not communication services subject to state ICMS tax as claimed by the State Revenue Services of São Paulo. PST has, and will continue to collect the municipal ISS tax on the vehicle tracking and monitoring services in compliance with Brazilian tax law and will defend its tax position. PST has received a legal opinion that the merits of the case are favorable to PST, determining among other things that the imposition on the subsidiary of the State ICMS by the State Revenue Services of São Paulo is not in accordance with the Brazilian tax code. Management believes, based on the legal opinion of the Company’s Brazilian legal counsel and the results of the Brazil Administrative Court's ruling in favor of another vehicle tracking and monitoring company related to the tax deficiency notice it received, the likelihood of loss is not probable although it may take years to resolve.  As a result of the above, as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, no accrual has been recorded with respect to the tax assessment.  An unfavorable judgment on this issue for the years assessed and for subsequent years could result in significant costs to PST and adversely affect its results of operations. There have been no significant changes to the facts and circumstances related to this notice for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)

(Unaudited)

In addition, PST has civil, labor and other tax contingencies for which the likelihood of loss is deemed to be reasonably possible, but not probable, by the Company’s legal advisors in Brazil. As a result, no provision has been recorded with respect to these contingencies, which amounted to $14,411 and $11,469 at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. An unfavorable outcome on this issue could result in significant cost to PST and adversely affect its results of operations.

Product Warranty and Recall

Amounts accrued for product warranty and recall claims are established based on the Company's best estimate of the amounts necessary to settle future and existing claims on products sold as of the balance sheet dates. These accruals are based on several factors including past experience, production changes, industry developments and various other considerations. The Company can provide no assurances that it will not experience material claims in the future or that it will not incur significant costs to defend or settle such claims beyond the amounts accrued or beyond what the Company may recover from its suppliers. The current portion of product warranty and recall is included as a component of accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Product warranty and recall included $1,168 and $1,019 of a long-term liability at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, which is included as a component of other long-term liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The following provides a reconciliation of changes in product warranty and recall liability: 

(12) Income Taxes

The Company adjusts its effective tax rate each quarter based on the estimated annual effective tax rate, as required. The Company also records the tax impact of certain discrete, unusual or infrequently occurring items, including changes in judgment about valuation allowances and effects of changes in tax laws or rates, in the interim period in which they occur. In addition, jurisdictions with a projected loss for the year where no tax benefit can be recognized are excluded from the estimated annual effective tax rate. The impact of such an exclusion could result in a higher or lower effective tax rate during a particular quarter, based upon the mix and timing of actual earnings versus annual projected earnings.

The Company recognized an income tax provision (benefit) of ($1,174) and $794 from continuing operations for federal, state and foreign income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.  The decrease in the tax provision for the three months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the same period for 2013 was primarily due to the tax benefit recognized on the PST loss, as adjusted for the non-tax deductible goodwill impairment benefit. The decrease in the effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2014 to (14.7)% compared to the same period for 2013 of 9.6% was due to the recognition of a tax benefit on the PST operating loss and the impact of the non-tax deductible goodwill impairment benefit. The decrease in the effective tax rate was partially offset by a reduction in U.S. earnings.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)

(Unaudited)

The Company recognized an income tax provision (benefit) of ($790) and $2,260 from continuing operations for federal, state and foreign income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in the tax provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the same period for 2013 was primarily due to the tax benefit recognized on the PST loss, as adjusted for the non-tax deductible goodwill impairment charge. The decrease in tax expense was partially offset by discrete tax items related to certain foreign operations recorded during the current period. The decrease in the effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 to 3.8% compared to the same period for 2013 of 11.7% was due to the recognition of a tax benefit on the PST operating loss which was offset by the impact of the non-tax deductible PST goodwill impairment as well as the impact of the discrete tax items discussed above.

(13) Segment Reporting

Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise that are evaluated regularly by the Company's chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company's chief operating decision maker is the chief executive officer.

During the third quarter of 2014 the Company sold its Wiring business segment, which designed and manufactured wiring harness products and assembled instrument panels for sale principally to the commercial, agricultural and off-highway vehicle markets. As such, for all periods presented the Company reported this business as discontinued operations in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements and therefore excluded it from the segment disclosures herein. See Note 3 for additional details.

The Company has three reportable segments, Control Devices, Electronics and PST, which also represent its operating segments. The Control Devices reportable segment produces sensors, switches, valves and actuators. The Electronics reportable segment produces electronic instrument clusters, electronic control units and driver information systems. The PST reportable segment designs and manufactures electronic vehicle security alarms, convenience accessories, vehicle tracking devices and monitoring services and in-vehicle audio and video devices.

Also, during the first half of 2014 the Company changed its segment operating performance metric in accordance with changes in the financial information reviewed and performance measured by the Company’s chief operating decision maker. As a result, the Company now uses operating income for financial reporting purposes. Historically, the Company used income before income taxes. The Company has revised the consolidated segment information for all periods presented to reflect this presentation.

The accounting policies of the Company's reportable segments are the same as those described in Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the Company's 2013 Form 10-K. The Company's management evaluates the performance of its reportable segments based primarily on revenues from external customers, capital expenditures and operating income. Inter-segment sales are accounted for on terms similar to those to third parties and are eliminated upon consolidation.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)

(Unaudited)

A summary of financial information by reportable segment is as follows:

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)

(Unaudited)

The following table presents net sales and long-term assets for each of the geographic areas in which the Company operates: 

(14) Investments

Minda Stoneridge Instruments Ltd.

The Company has a 49% interest in Minda Stoneridge Instruments Ltd. (“Minda”), a company based in India that manufactures electronics, instrumentation equipment and sensors primarily for the motorcycle and commercial vehicle market. The investment is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The Company's investment in Minda recorded as a component of investments and other long-term assets, net on the condensed consolidated balance sheets, was $6,564 and $5,981 at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. Equity in earnings of Minda included in the condensed consolidated statements of operations was $205 and $99, for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Equity in earnings of Minda included in the condensed consolidated statements of operations was $587 and $396, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)

(Unaudited)

PST Eletrônica Ltda.

The Company has a 74% controlling interest in PST. Noncontrolling interest in PST decreased by $8,157 to $31,383 at September 30, 2014 due to a proportionate share of its net loss of $7,039 including goodwill impairment for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and an unfavorable change in foreign currency translation of $1,118. Noncontrolling interest in PST decreased by $2,623 to $41,243 at September 30, 2013 due to an unfavorable change in foreign currency translation of $3,706 and a dividend of $211, partially offset by a proportionate share of its net income of $1,264 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Comprehensive loss related to the PST noncontrolling interest was $2,294 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and comprehensive income was $214 for the three months ended September 30, 2013. Comprehensive loss related to the PST noncontrolling interest was $8,157 and $2,442 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. 

(15) Subsequent Events

On October 15, 2014, the Company redeemed the remaining $157,500 of its 9.5% senior secured notes at a price of 104.75% of the principal amount discharging the corresponding senior notes indenture. As a result of the redemption, the Company will recognize a loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately $9,700 in the fourth quarter of 2014, which includes a premium of $7,481 and the acceleration of the remaining deferred financing costs, original issue discount and de-designation date unrecognized gain on the interest rate swap. The senior secured notes were redeemed using funds from borrowing $100,000 under the Credit Facility as well as restricted cash.

On October 23, 2014, the Company terminated the interest rate swap resulting in a gain of approximately $371 in the fourth quarter of 2014.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Background

We are a global designer and manufacturer of highly engineered electrical and electronic components, modules and systems for the automotive, commercial, motorcycle, off-highway and agricultural vehicle markets.

Segments

We are primarily organized by products produced and markets served. Under this structure, our continuing operations have been reported utilizing the following segments:

Control Devices. This segment includes results of operations that manufacture sensors, switches, valves and actuators.

Electronics. This segment includes results of operations from the production of electronic instrument clusters, electronic control units and driver information systems.

PST. This segment includes results of operations that design and manufacture electronic vehicle alarms, convenience accessories, vehicle tracking devices and monitoring services and in-vehicle audio and video devices.

During the second quarter of 2014 we entered into an asset purchase agreement to divest our Wiring business, which designs and manufactures wiring harness products and assembles instrument panels principally to the commercial, agricultural and off-highway vehicle markets. On August 1, 2014, the Company completed the sale of substantially all of the assets and liabilities of its Wiring business. As a result, this business is classified as discontinued operations in our condensed consolidated financial statements and no discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is provided herein.

Third Quarter Overview

The Company had income from continuing operations attributable to Stoneridge, Inc. of $8.0 million, or $0.29 per diluted share and a loss from discontinued operations attributable to Stoneridge, Inc. of $8.1 million, or $0.29 per diluted share resulting in a net loss attributable to Stoneridge, Inc. of $0.1 million, or $0.0 per diluted share for the third quarter of 2014.

Net income from continuing operations attributable to Stoneridge. Inc. of $8.0 million, or $0.29 per diluted share for the third quarter of 2014 increased by $1.0 million, or $0.03 per diluted share from income from continuing operations of $7.0 million, or $0.26 per diluted share for the third quarter of 2013 primarily due to the benefit of $4.5 million of PST goodwill impairment adjustment based on the completion of the “step two” testing in the third quarter of 2014 and higher operating income in our Control Devices segment, which was offset by lower operating income in our Electronics and PST segments (excluding the benefit of goodwill). The increase in sales volume in our Electronics and Control Devices segments was more than offset by lower PST sales volume, an unfavorable change in mix of products sold and higher sales, general and administrative and design and development costs.

Net sales increased by $8.8 million, or 5.4%, primarily due to higher sales in our Electronics and Control Devices segments during the third quarter of 2014 compared to the third quarter of 2013 which were partially offset by lower product sales volume at our PST segment.

Loss from discontinued operations related to the Wiring business was $8.1 million, or $(0.29) per diluted share for the third quarter of 2014, a $6.1 million, or $0.22 per diluted share decrease from loss from discontinued operations of $1.9 million, or $0.07 per diluted share for the third quarter of 2013 primarily due to the after-tax loss on disposal of the Wiring business of $6.5 million.

At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we maintained a cash and cash equivalents balance of $93.7 million (including restricted cash of $52.7 million) and $62.8 million, respectively. The increase was primarily due to the proceeds received from the sale of the Wiring business on August 1, 2014 which was partially offset by the redemption of $17.5 million senior secured notes and higher working capital. As discussed in Note 8 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had no borrowings outstanding on our credit facilities.

Outlook

The North American automotive vehicle market is expected to continue to have modest improvement for the remainder of 2014 and into 2015. For 2014, this production volume is forecasted to be in the range of 16.5 million to 17.0 million units, an increase from 16.2 million units in 2013. The improvement in the North American automotive vehicle market and sales of new products had a favorable effect on our Control Devices segment’s results for the first nine months of 2014 which we expect will continue for the remainder of the year and into 2015.

The North American commercial vehicle market showed weakness throughout 2013, but has improved in the first nine months of 2014 which we believe will continue throughout the remainder of 2014 and into 2015.

The European commercial vehicle market improved in the first nine months of 2014 which is expected to continue throughout the remainder of 2014 and into 2015 which will have a favorable impact on our Electronics segment.

Our PST segment revenues decreased in the first nine months of 2014 compared to 2013 due to a weakened Brazilian economy. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) forecasts the Brazil gross domestic product to grow only 0.3% in 2014 and 1.4% in 2015, a decrease from 2.5% in 2013. Also, the Brazil automotive industry has been weak throughout 2014. As there is significant uncertainty regarding the timing and magnitude of the Brazilian economy and automotive industry recovery, PST has and will continue to realign its cost structure to mitigate the impact on earnings of possible continued lower product demand for the remainder of 2014 and the first half of 2015.

Due to the competitive nature of the markets we serve, in the ordinary course of business we face pricing pressures from our customers. In response to these pricing pressures we have been able to effectively manage our production costs by the combination of lowering certain costs and limiting the increase of others, the net impact of which has not been material. However, if we are unable to effectively manage production costs in the future to mitigate future pricing pressures, our results of operations would be adversely affected.

Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2013

Condensed consolidated statements of operations as a percentage of net sales are presented in the following table (in thousands):