STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. - Annual Report: 2016 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

[X]          ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016

OR

[  ]

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______________ to _____________

Commission file number: 0-11635

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(Issuer's telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. 

Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant:  (i) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (ii) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [__]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes [X] No [__]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

Yes [X] No [__]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes [  ] No [X]

The number of shares outstanding of our common stock as of June 30, 2016, was 10,612,814 shares. The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates (8,349,419 shares), based on the closing market price ($0.61) of the common stock as of June 30, 2016 was $5,093,146.

As of March 9, 2017, the number of shares outstanding of our common stock was 10,909,490. The closing market price of our common stock as of March 9, 2017 was $.59.

 

Table of Contents

i

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, or this Report, are "forward-looking statements." These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about the plans, objectives, expectations and intentions of STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (referred to in this Report as "we," "us," "our", "registrant" or "the Company") and other statements contained in this Report that are not historical facts. Forward-looking statements in this Report or hereafter included in other publicly available documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the Commission, reports to our stockholders and other publicly available statements issued or released by us involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause our actual results, performance (financial or operating) or achievements to differ from the future results, performance (financial or operating) or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such future results are based upon management's best estimates based upon current conditions and the most recent results of operations. When used in this Report, the words "will, " "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "plan," "believe," "seek," "estimate" and similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements, because these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. There are important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, including our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other factors discussed under "Risk Factors." We undertake no obligation to update such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:

 

In light of these assumptions, risks and uncertainties, the results and events discussed in the forward-looking statements contained in this Report might not occur. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Report. We are not under any obligation, and we expressly disclaim any obligation, to update or alter any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All subsequent forward-looking statements attributable to us or to any person acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section.

PART I

Item 1.          Business

Our Company

Overview

We are a medical technology company dedicated to developing and commercializing innovative products for the treatment of dermatological disorders. In June 2015 we completed the acquisition, the "Acquisition", of the XTRAC® Excimer Laser and the VTRAC® excimer lamp businesses from PhotoMedex, Inc. The XTRAC and VTRAC products are devices cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, for the treatment of psoriasis, vitiligo and other skin disorders. The purchase price was $42.5 million plus the assumption of certain business-related liabilities. We believe that these businesses acquired create a platform on which to transform STRATA into a leading medical dermatology company.

We are in the process of discontinuing our efforts to develop and commercialize the MelaFind® system, or MelaFind, a device for aiding dermatologists in the evaluation of clinically atypical pigmented skin lesions. The MelaFind ® system is used when the dermatologist chooses to obtain additional information before making a final decision to biopsy in order to rule out melanoma. MelaFind has not achieved a significant enough level of acceptance by dermatologists to justify the continued investment of our scarce resources. In March 2017, we sent a notice to the 90 owners of MelaFind devices in the United States informing them that, effective September 30, 2017, we no longer had the resources to continue to support the device and that our inventory of spare parts was being offered for sale to them on a first-come, first-serve basis.

XTRAC® Systems and VTRAC Systems

The XTRAC excimer laser technology emits highly concentrated UV light to treat dermatological skin disorders. It received FDA clearance in 2000 and has since become a widely recognized treatment for psoriasis, vitiligo and other skin diseases. Psoriasis and vitiligo alone, affect up to 10.5 million people in the U.S. and 190 million people worldwide. VTRAC is a UV light lamp system that works in much the same way as the XTRAC. It received FDA clearance in August 2005 and CE mark approval in January 2006 and has been marketed exclusively in international markets.

Present in natural sunlight, UVB is an accepted psoriasis treatment that penetrates the skin to slow the growth of damaged skin cells thereby placing the disease into remission for a period of time. Studies have shown that the remission time can last 3 to 6 months or longer. In our XTRAC system, our targeted therapy approach delivers optimum amounts of UVB light directly to skin lesions, sparing healthy tissue. Many peer reviewed studies have proven that the XTRAC can clear psoriasis faster and produce longer remissions than other UVB modalities, resulting in fewer treatments to produce the desired result.

We market two XTRAC excimer models: the XTRAC Velocity is our most advanced technology which allows clinicians to treat greater surface areas of psoriatic disease in a shorter period of time than other technologies. The XTRAC Ultra Plus is also a highly effective model marketed primarily in certain international markets. Both the Velocity and the Ultra plus are capable of treating mild, moderate and severe psoriasis, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis and leukoderma.

The XTRAC is marketed in the U.S. mainly under a recurring revenue model; in which we place the system in the physician's office for no upfront charge and generate our revenue on a per-use basis. We estimate that there are roughly 1,000 XTRAC lasers in use in the U.S., of which 775 systems were, as of December 31, 2016, included in the recurring revenue model. The target U.S. audience for XTRAC lasers comprises approximately 3,500 dermatologists who perform disease management. In markets outside the U.S., the XTRAC laser is marketed primarily as a capital sale through a master international distributor to distributors in twenty-five countries. The VTRAC is marketed exclusively in international markets through the same master international distributor.

Studies have concluded that XTRAC treatment leads to significant improvement in psoriasis area and severity scores in as little as 6 to 10 treatments. Treatment protocols recommend that patients receive two treatments per week with a minimum of 48 hours between treatments. Our data shows that XTRAC has an 89% efficacy rate and produces only minimal side effects. In support of its clinical effect, the XTRAC Excimer lasers have been cited in over 45 clinical studies and research programs, with findings published in peer-reviewed medical journals around the world. The products have also been endorsed by the National Psoriasis Foundation, and their use for psoriasis is covered by nearly all major insurance companies, including Medicare.

XTRAC is a reimbursable procedure for psoriasis under three Current Procedural Terminology ("CPT") codes. There are three applicable CPT codes that differ based on area of treatment only. Insurance Reimbursement to physicians varies based upon insurance company and geography. The national CPT code reimbursement established by the Center for Medicaid Services (CMS) which forms the basis for most insurance companies' reimbursement levels ranges for the three codes between $150 per treatment to $240 per treatment. (See "Third Party Reimbursement".)

Psoriasis Treatment Options

There are essentially three main types of psoriasis treatments, as listed below.

 

The XTRAC Excimer Lasers are particularly significant and beneficial for moderate and severe psoriasis patients who prefer a noninvasive treatment approach without the side effects of invasive, systemic agents, or to patients who have developed a resistance to topical agents. In many cases, patients treated with topical or systemic therapies are also candidates for phototherapy.

Using the XTRAC Excimer Lasers to Treat Vitiligo and Other Skin Diseases

UV light therapy is considered to be an effective and safe treatment for many skin disorders beyond psoriasis. To this effect, the XTRAC technology is FDA cleared for the treatment of not only psoriasis but also vitiligo (a skin pigment deficiency), atopic dermatitis (eczema) and leukoderma, which is a localized loss of skin pigmentation that occurs after an inflammatory skin condition, such as a burn, intralesional steroid injection, or post dermabrasion.

XTRAC technology for vitiligo patients typically requires more therapy sessions than for psoriasis, but is dependent on the severity of the disease. In the treatment of vitiligo, the XTRAC functions to reactivate the skin's melanocytes (the cells that produce melanin), which causes pigment to return. To date, there is not sufficient data to confirm how long patients can expect their vitiligo to be in remission after XTRAC therapy. Based on anecdotal reports, we believe that re-pigmentation may last for several years.

Historically, vitiligo treatments had been considered cosmetic procedures by insurance companies, and as such were not reimbursed. However, over the past several years, there has been a significant increase in insurance coverage for these procedures, and we estimate that currently approximately 50% of insurers consider XTRAC treatments to be medically necessary for the treatment of vitiligo and therefore provide coverage.

We believe that several factors have limited the growth of the use of XTRAC treatments from those who suffer from psoriasis and vitiligo. Specifically, we believe that awareness of the positive effects of XTRAC treatments has not been high enough among both sufferers and providers; and that the treatment regimen requiring sometimes up to 12 or more treatments has limited XTRAC use to certain patient populations. Therefore, to address the lack of knowledge issue, we have a direct to patient advertising campaign aimed at motivating psoriasis and vitiligo patients to seek out XTRAC treatments from our physician customers. Specific advertisements encourage prospective patients to contact our patient advocacy center through telephone or web site whereby we provide information on the treatment and insurance coverage, and we ultimately schedule an appointment for the prospective patient to be evaluated by a physician within our customer network, convenient to their location, to determine if they would benefit from XTRAC treatments. We are in the process of a research and development effort to develop products to assist in the reduction of the number of treatments in the XTRAC treatment protocol to make XTRAC treatments gain a wider appeal for those patients who cannot fit the current treatment regimen into their schedules.

The MelaFind System

In November 2011, we received a Pre-Market Approval, or PMA, from the FDA for MelaFind, a non-invasive, point-of-care (i.e. in the doctor's office) instrument to aid in the detection of melanoma, having already received in September 2011 Conformité Européenne ("CE") Mark approval. On March 7, 2012, we installed the first commercial MelaFind System. We designed MelaFind to aid in the evaluation of clinically atypical pigmented skin lesions, when a dermatologist chooses to obtain additional information before making a final decision to biopsy in order to rule out melanoma. MelaFind acquires and displays multi-spectral (from blue to near infrared) and dermoscopic Red Green Blue ("RGB") digital data from pigmented skin lesions. It uses automatic data analysis and statistical pattern recognition to help identify lesions to be considered for biopsy to rule out melanoma. We believe that with the assistance provided by MelaFind, dermatologists may diagnose more melanomas at the most curable stages. However, the MelaFind System has not gained sufficient acceptance by dermatologists to justify continued investment.

In March 2017, we sent a notice to the 90 owners of MelaFind devices in the United States informing them that effective September 30, 2017, we no longer had the resources to continue to support the device and that our inventory of spare parts was being offered for sale to them on a first-come, first-serve basis.

MelaFind Product Description

The MelaFind system consists of a hand-held imager, which is comprised of an illuminator that shines light of 10 different specific wavelengths, including near infra-red bands; a lens system that focuses the light reflected from the lesions; and a processor employing proprietary algorithms to extract many discrete characteristics or features from the lesions.

Post-Approval Study

In November 2011, we received written approval from the FDA for the MelaFind system PMA. In connection with the approval, we committed to conduct a Post-Approval Study ("PAS") of MelaFind. Agreement on the study protocol was reached with the FDA and the study was initiated during 2012.

On January 4, 2017, FDA accepted our final report on the PAS and marked the study status as "Terminated" on the Post-Approval Studies webpage due to the approval of a modified device (PMA supplement on the MelaFind Output) for which data had already been provided in the Reader Study.

Competition

Our XTRAC product line competes with pharmaceutical compounds and methodologies used to treat an array of skin conditions. Such alternative treatments may be in the form of topical products, systemic medications, and phototherapies from both large pharmaceutical and smaller devices companies. Currently, our XTRAC system is believed to be a competitive therapy to alternative treatments on the basis of its recognized clinical effect, minimal side effect profile, cost-effectiveness and reimbursement.

Manufacturing

We manufacture our XTRAC products at our 28,000 sq. ft. facility in Carlsbad, California. Our California facility is ISO 13485 certified. ISO 13485 is an International standardization written by the International Organization for Standardization, which publishes requirements for a comprehensive quality management system for the design and manufacture of medical devices. Certification to the standard is awarded by accredited third parties. We believe that our present manufacturing capacity at these facilities is sufficient to meet foreseeable demand for our products.

Research and Development Efforts

Our research and development team, including engineers, consists of approximately five employees. We conduct research and development activities at our facility located in Carlsbad, California. Currently, our research and development efforts are focused on the application of our XTRAC system to the treatment of inflammatory skin disorders.

Intellectual Property

Our policy is to protect our intellectual property by obtaining U.S. and foreign patents to protect technology, inventions and improvements important to the development of our business. As of December 31, 2016, 28 issued U.S. patents are in force, and many of these patents have foreign counterparts issued and pending. Of those issued, 10 U.S. patents and one German patent relate to the XTRAC and VTRAC product lines and eighteen U.S. patents, and several foreign patents related to various aspects of MelaFind technology. As these MelaFind related patents come up for the payment of periodic maintenance fees, we will assess the need to continue to maintain their existence. We have not granted any significant licenses with respect to our intellectual property.

We also rely on trade secrets and technical know-how in the manufacture and marketing of our products. We require our employees, consultants and contractors to execute confidentiality agreements with respect to our proprietary information.

We believe that our patented methods and apparatus, together with proprietary trade-secret technology and registered trademarks, give us a competitive advantage; however, whether a patent is infringed or is valid, or whether or not a patent application should be granted, are all complex matters of science and law, and therefore, we cannot be certain that, if challenged, our patented methods and apparatus and/or trade-secret technology would be upheld. If one or more of our patented methods, patented apparatus or trade-secret technology rights, or our trademark rights, are invalidated, rejected or found unenforceable, that could reduce or eliminate any competitive advantage we might otherwise have had.

Government Regulation

Regulations Relating to Products and Manufacturing

Our products and research and development activities are regulated by numerous governmental authorities, principally the FDA and corresponding state and foreign regulatory agencies. Any medical device or cosmetic we manufacture and/or distribute will be subject to pervasive and continuing regulation by the FDA. The U.S. Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act, or FD&C Act, and other federal and state laws and regulations govern the pre-clinical and clinical testing, design, manufacture, use, labeling and promotion of medical devices, including our XTRAC, VTRAC and MelaFind systems. Product development and approval for medical devices within this regulatory framework takes a number of years and involves the expenditure of substantial resources.

In the U.S., medical devices are classified into three different classes, Class I, II and III, on the basis of controls deemed necessary to provide a reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device. Class I devices are subject to general controls, such as facility registration, medical device listing, labeling requirements, premarket notification (unless the medical device has been specifically exempted from this requirement), adherence to the FDA's Quality System Regulation, and requirements concerning the submission of device-related adverse event reports to the FDA. Class II devices are subject to general and special controls, such as performance standards, pre-market notification (510(k) clearance), post-market surveillance, and FDA Quality System Regulations. Generally, Class III devices are those that must receive premarket approval by the FDA to provide a reasonable assurance of their safety and effectiveness, such as life-sustaining, life-supporting and implantable devices, or new devices that have been found not to be substantially equivalent to existing legally marketed devices.

With limited exceptions, before a new medical device can be distributed in the U.S., marketing authorization typically must be obtained from the FDA through a premarket notification under Section 510(k) of the FDA Act, or through a premarket approval application under Section 515 of the FDA Act. The FDA will typically grant a 510(k) clearance if it can be established that the device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device that is a legally marketed Class I or II device (or to pre-amendments Class III devices for which the FDA has yet to call for premarket approvals). We have received FDA 510(k) clearance to market our XTRAC and VTRAC systems for the treatment of psoriasis, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis and leukoderma. The FDA granted these clearances under Section 510(k) on the basis of substantial equivalence to other technologies that had received prior clearances.

For any devices that are cleared through the 510(k) process, modifications or enhancements that could significantly affect the safety or effectiveness of the device, or that constitute a major change in the intended use of the device, will require a new 510(k) submission. In August 2003, the FDA granted 510(k) clearance for a significantly modified version of our XTRAC laser, which we have marketed as the XTRAC XL Plus Excimer Laser System. In October 2004, the FDA granted clearance for the XTRAC Ultra (AL 8000) Excimer Laser System and, in March 2008, we received 510(k) clearance for the XTRAC Velocity (AL 10000) Excimer Laser System. These approvals were originally granted to PhotoMedex, Inc. and acquired by us in the June 2015 asset acquisition transaction described above.

We were required to secure premarket approval for the MelaFind system. A premarket approval application may be required for a Class II device if it is not substantially equivalent to an existing legally marketed Class I or II device (or a pre-amendments Class III device for which the FDA has yet to call for premarket approval) or if the device is a Class III premarket approval device by regulation. A premarket approval application must be supported by valid scientific evidence to demonstrate a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device, typically including the results of clinical trials, bench tests and possibly animal studies. In addition, the submission must include, among other things, the proposed labeling. The premarket approval process can be expensive, uncertain and lengthy and a number of devices for which FDA approval has been sought by other companies have never been approved for marketing.

We are subject to routine inspection by the FDA and, as noted above, must comply with a number of regulatory requirements applicable to firms that manufacture medical devices and other FDA-regulated products for distribution within the U.S., including requirements related to device labeling (including prohibitions against promoting products for unapproved or off-label uses), facility registration, medical device listing, labeling requirements, adherence to the FDA's Quality System Regulation, good manufacturing processes and requirements for the submission of reports regarding certain device-related adverse events to the FDA.

We are also subject to the radiological health provisions of the FDA Act and the general and laser-specific radiation safety regulations administered by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, or CDRH, of the FDA. These regulations require laser manufacturers to file initial, new product, supplemental and annual reports, to maintain quality control, product testing and sales records, to incorporate certain design and operating features (depending on the class of product) in lasers sold to end users pursuant to a performance standard and to certify and appropriately label each laser sold as belonging to one of four classes, based on the level of radiation from the laser that is accessible to users. Moreover, we are obligated to repair, replace, or refund the cost of certain electronic products that are found to fail to comply with applicable federal standards or otherwise are found to be defective. The CDRH is empowered to seek fines and other remedies for violations of the regulatory requirements. To date, we have filed the documentation with the CDRH for our laser products requiring such filing and have not experienced any difficulties or incurred significant costs in complying with such regulations.

We are approved by the European Union to affix the CE Mark to our XTRAC laser, VTRAC lamp and MelaFind systems. This certification is a mandatory conformity mark for products placed on the market in the European Economic Area, which is evidence that they meet all European Community, or EC, quality assurance standards and compliance with applicable European medical device directives for the production of medical devices. This will enable us to market our approved products in all of the member countries that accept the CE Mark. We also will be required to comply with additional individual national requirements that are in addition to those required by these nations. Our products have also met the requirements for marketing in various other countries.

Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements can result in fines, injunctions, civil penalties, recalls or seizures of products, total or partial suspensions of production, refusals by the U.S and foreign governments to permit product sales and criminal prosecution.

We are or may become subject to various other federal, state, local and foreign laws, regulations and policies relating to, among other things, safe working conditions, good laboratory practices and the use and disposal of hazardous or potentially hazardous substances used in connection with research and development.

Fraud and Abuse Laws

Because of the significant federal funding involved in Medicare and Medicaid, Congress and the states have enacted, and actively enforce, a number of laws whose purpose is to eliminate fraud and abuse in federal health care programs. Our business is subject to compliance with these laws.

Anti-Kickback Laws

In the U.S., there are federal and state anti-kickback laws that generally prohibit the payment or receipt of kickbacks, bribes or other remuneration in exchange for the referral of patients or other health-related business. The U.S. federal healthcare programs' Anti-Kickback Statute makes it unlawful for individuals or entities knowingly and willfully to solicit, offer, receive or pay any kickback, bribe or other remuneration, directly or indirectly, in exchange for or to induce the purchase, lease or order, or arranging for or recommending purchasing, leasing, or ordering, any good, facility, service, or item for which payment may be made in whole or in part under a federal healthcare program such as Medicare or Medicaid. The Anti-Kickback Statute covers "any remuneration," which has been broadly interpreted to include anything of value, including for example gifts, certain discounts, the furnishing of free supplies, equipment or services, credit arrangements, payments of cash and waivers of payments. Several courts have interpreted the statute's intent requirement to mean that if any one purpose of an arrangement involving remuneration is to induce referrals of federal healthcare covered business, the arrangement can be found to violate the statute. Penalties for violations include criminal penalties and civil sanctions such as fines, imprisonment and possible exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs. In addition, several courts have permitted kickback cases brought under the Federal False Claims Act to proceed, as discussed in more detail below.

The reach of the Anti-Kickback Statute was broadened by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (the "ACA"), which, among other things, amends the intent requirement of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute. Pursuant to the statutory amendment, a person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of this statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation. In addition, the ACA provides that the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the civil False Claims Act (discussed below) or the civil monetary penalties statute, which imposes penalties against any person who is determined to have presented or caused to be presented a claim to a federal health program that the person knows or should know is for an item or service that was not provided as claimed or is false or fraudulent.

Because the Anti-Kickback Statute is broadly written and encompasses many harmless or efficient arrangements, Congress authorized the Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or OIG, to issue a series of regulations, known as "safe harbors." For example, there are regulatory safe harbors for payments to bona fide employees, properly reported discounts and rebates, and for certain investment interests. Although an arrangement that fits into one or more of these exceptions or safe harbors is immune from prosecution, arrangements that do not fit squarely within an exception or safe harbor do not necessarily violate the statute. The failure of a transaction or arrangement to fit precisely within one or more of the exceptions or safe harbors does not necessarily mean that it is illegal or that prosecution will be pursued. However, conduct and business arrangements that arguably implicate the Anti-Kickback Statute but do not fully satisfy all the elements of an exception or safe harbor may be subject to increased scrutiny by government enforcement authorities such as the OIG.

Many states have laws that implicate anti-kickback restrictions similar to the Anti-Kickback Statute. Some of these state prohibitions apply, regardless of whether federal health care program business is involved, to arrangements such as for self-pay or private-pay patients.

Government officials have focused their enforcement efforts on marketing of healthcare services and products, among other activities, and recently have brought cases against companies, and certain sales, marketing and executive personnel, for allegedly offering unlawful inducements to potential or existing customers in an attempt to procure their business.

Federal Civil False Claims Act and State False Claims Laws

The federal civil False Claims Act imposes liability on any person or entity who, among other things, knowingly and willfully presents, or causes to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment by a federal healthcare program, including Medicare and Medicaid. The "qui tam," or "whistleblower" provisions of the False Claims Act allow a private individual to bring actions on behalf of the federal government alleging that the defendant has submitted a false claim to the federal government, and to share in any monetary recovery. In recent years, the number of suits brought against healthcare providers by private individuals has increased dramatically. Medical device companies, like us, can be held liable under false claims laws, even if they do not submit claims to the government, when they are deemed to have caused submission of false claims by, among other things, providing incorrect coding or billing advice about their products to customers that file claims, or by engaging in kickback arrangements with customers that file claims.

The False Claims Act also has been used to assert liability on the basis of misrepresentations with respect to the services rendered and in connection with alleged off-label promotion of products. Our future activities relating to the manner in which we sell our products and document our prices, such as the reporting of discount and rebate information and other information affecting federal, state and third-party reimbursement of our products, and the sale and marketing of our products, may be subject to scrutiny under these laws.

When an entity is determined to have violated the False Claims Act, it may be required to pay up to three times the actual damages sustained by the government, plus civil penalties of $5,500 to $11,000 for each separate false claim. There are many potential bases for liability under the False Claims Act. A number of states have enacted false claim laws analogous to the federal civil False Claims Act and many of these state laws apply where a claim is submitted to any state or private third-party payor. In this environment, our engagement of physician consultants in product development and product training and education could subject us to similar scrutiny. We are unable to predict whether we would be subject to actions under the False Claims Act or a similar state law, or the impact of such actions. However, the costs of defending such claims, as well as any sanctions imposed, could significantly affect our financial performance.

HIPAA Fraud and Other Regulations

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, created a class of federal crimes known as the "federal health care offenses," including healthcare fraud and false statements relating to healthcare matters. The HIPAA health care fraud statute prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme or artifice to defraud any healthcare benefit program, or to obtain by means of false of fraudulent pretenses, any money under the control of any health care benefit program, including private payors. A violation of this statute is a felony and may result in fines, imprisonment and/or exclusion from government-sponsored programs. The HIPAA false statements statute prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or representation in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services. A violation of this statute is a felony and may result in fines and/or imprisonment. Entities that are found to have aided or abetted in a violation of the HIPAA federal health care offenses are deemed by statute to have committed the offense and are punishable as a principal.

We are also subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar anti-bribery laws applicable in non-U.S. jurisdictions that generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to non-U.S. government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Because of the predominance of government-sponsored healthcare systems around the world, most of our customer relationships outside of the U.S. will be with governmental entities and therefore subject to such anti-bribery laws.

HIPAA and Other Privacy Regulations

The regulations that implement HIPAA also establish uniform standards governing the conduct of certain electronic healthcare transactions and protecting the security and privacy of individually identifiable health information maintained or transmitted by healthcare providers, health plans and healthcare clearinghouses, which are referred to as "covered entities." Several regulations have been promulgated under HIPAA's regulations including: the Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information, or the Privacy Rule, which restricts the use and disclosure of certain individually identifiable health information; the Standards for Electronic Transactions, or the Transactions Rule, which establishes standards for common healthcare transactions, such as claims information, plan eligibility, payment information and the use of electronic signatures; and the Security Standards for the Protection of Electronic Protected Health Information, or the Security Rule, which requires covered entities to implement and maintain certain security measures to safeguard certain electronic health information. Although we do not believe we are a covered entity and therefore are not currently directly subject to these standards, we expect that our customers generally will be covered entities and may ask us to contractually comply with certain aspects of these standards by entering into requisite business associate agreements. While the government intended this legislation to reduce administrative expenses and burdens for the healthcare industry, our compliance with certain provisions of these standards entails significant costs for us.

The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, or the HITECH Act, which was enacted in February 2009, strengthens and expands the HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules and the restrictions on use and disclosure of patient identifiable health information. HITECH also fundamentally changed a business associate's obligations by imposing a number of Privacy Rule requirements and a majority of Security Rule provisions directly on business associates that were previously only directly applicable to covered entities. HITECH includes, but is not limited to, prohibitions on exchanging patient identifiable health information for remuneration, restrictions on marketing to individuals, and obligations to agree to provide individuals an accounting of virtually all disclosures of their health information. Moreover, HITECH requires covered entities to report any unauthorized use or disclosure of patient identifiable health information, known as a breach, to the affected individuals, the United States Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, and, depending on the size of any such breach, the media for the affected market. Business associates are similarly required to notify covered entities of a breach. Most of the HITECH provisions became effective in February 2010. HHS has already issued regulations governing breach notification which were effective in September 2009.

HITECH has increased civil penalty amounts for violations of HIPAA by either covered entities or business associates up to an annual maximum of $1.5 million for uncorrected violations based on willful neglect. Imposition of these penalties is more likely now because HITECH significantly strengthens enforcement. It requires HHS to conduct periodic audits to confirm compliance and to investigate any violation that involves willful neglect which carries mandatory penalties. Additionally, state attorneys general are authorized to bring civil actions seeking either injunctions or damages in response to violations of HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules that threaten the privacy of state residents.

In addition to federal regulations issued under HIPAA, some states have enacted privacy and security statutes or regulations that, in some cases, are more stringent than those issued under HIPAA. In those cases, it may be necessary to modify our planned operations and procedures to comply with the more stringent state laws. If we fail to comply with applicable state laws and regulations, we could be subject to additional sanctions.

Federal and state consumer protection laws are being applied increasingly by the United States Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, and state attorneys general to regulate the collection, use, storage and disclosure of personal or patient information, through websites or otherwise, and to regulate the presentation of web site content. Courts may also adopt the standards for fair information practices promulgated by the FTC, which concern consumer notice, choice, security and access. Numerous other countries have or are developing laws governing the collection, use, disclosure and transmission of personal or patient information.

HIPAA as well as other federal and state laws apply to our receipt of patient identifiable health information in connection with research and clinical trials. We collaborate with other individuals and entities in conducting research and all involved parties must comply with applicable laws. Therefore, the compliance of the physicians, hospitals or other providers or entities with whom we collaborate also impacts our business.

Third-Party Reimbursement

Our ability to market our phototherapy products successfully depends in large part on the extent to which various third parties are willing to reimburse patients or providers for the cost of medical procedures utilizing our treatment products. These third parties include government authorities, private health insurers and other organizations, such as health maintenance organizations. Third-party payors are systematically challenging the prices charged for medical products and services. They may deny reimbursement if they determine that a prescribed device is not used in accordance with cost-effective treatment methods as determined by the payor, or is experimental, unnecessary or inappropriate. Accordingly, if less costly drugs or other treatments are available, third-party payors may not authorize, or may limit, reimbursement for the use of our products, even if our products are safer or more effective than the alternatives. Additionally, they may require changes to our pricing structure and revenue model before authorizing reimbursement.

Reimbursement systems in international markets vary significantly by country and by region within some countries, and reimbursement approvals must be obtained on a country-by-country basis. Many international markets have government-managed healthcare systems that control reimbursement for new devices and procedures. In most markets, there are private insurance systems, as well as government-managed systems. Our XTRAC products remain substantially without approval for reimbursement in many international markets under either government or private reimbursement systems.

Many private plans key their reimbursement rates to rates set by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) under three distinct Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes based on the total skin surface area being treated.

As of March 9, 2017, the national rates were as follows:

The national rates are adjusted by overhead factors applicable to each state.

Employees

As of March 9, 2017, we had 96 full-time employees, which consisted of two executive officers, 5 senior managers, 48 sales and marketing staff, 12 people engaged in manufacturing of lasers, 15 customer-field service personnel, 5 engaged in research and development and 9 finance and administration staff.

Financial Information about Geographic Areas

See Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this filing.

Item 1A.          Risk Factors

In addition to the other information contained in this Annual Report and the exhibits hereto, the following risk factors should be considered carefully in evaluating our business. Our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also adversely affect our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations. The following discussion of risk factors contains forward-looking statements as discussed on page 1. Our business routinely encounters and addresses risks, some of which may cause our future results to be different – sometimes materially different – than we presently anticipate.

We have incurred losses for a number of years, and anticipate that we will incur continued losses for the foreseeable future.

Since 1999, we have primarily financed our operations through the sale of our equity securities and have devoted substantially all of our resources to research, development and commercialization of MelaFind. Our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 was approximately $3.3 million, and as of December 31, 2016, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $210.6 million. Our profitability was negatively impacted by interest expense related to the June 2015 financing. Our losses, among other things, have had and will continue to have an adverse effect on our stockholders' equity. Upon the closing of our acquisition of the XTRAC and VTRAC products in June 2015 we began to recognize revenues of those products, which we expect will provide sufficient cash flow to fund our current operations for the foreseeable future.

We may acquire other assets or businesses, or form collaborations or make investments in other companies or technologies that could harm our operating results, dilute our stockholders' ownership, increase our debt or cause us to incur significant expense.

As part of our business strategy, we may pursue acquisitions of assets, including preclinical, clinical or commercial stage products or product candidates, or businesses, or strategic alliances and collaborations, to expand our existing technologies and operations. We may not identify or complete these transactions in a timely manner, on a cost-effective basis, or at all, and we may not realize the anticipated benefits of any such transaction, any of which could have a detrimental effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. We have limited experience with acquiring other companies, products or product candidates, and limited experience with forming strategic alliances and collaborations. We may not be able to find suitable acquisition candidates, and if we make any acquisitions, we may not be able to integrate these acquisitions successfully into our existing business and we may incur additional debt or assume unknown or contingent liabilities in connection therewith. Integration of an acquired company or assets may also disrupt ongoing operations, require the hiring of additional personnel and the implementation of additional internal systems and infrastructure, especially the acquisition of commercial assets, and require management resources that would otherwise focus on developing our existing business. We may not be able to find suitable strategic alliances or collaboration partners or identify other investment opportunities, and we may experience losses related to any such investments.

To finance any acquisitions or collaborations, we may choose to issue debt or equity securities as consideration. Any such issuance of shares would dilute the ownership of our stockholders. If the price of our common stock is low or volatile, we may not be able to acquire other assets or companies or fund a transaction using our stock as consideration. Alternatively, it may be necessary for us to raise additional funds for acquisitions through public or private financings. Additional funds may not be available on terms that are favorable to us, or at all.

We may not be able to successfully integrate newly acquired businesses, joint ventures and other partnerships into our operations or achieve expected profitability from our acquisitions.

If we cannot successfully integrate acquisitions, joint ventures and other partnerships on a timely basis, we may be unable to generate sufficient revenue to offset acquisition costs, we may incur costs in excess of what we anticipate, and our expectations of future results of operations, including certain cost savings and synergies, may not be achieved. Acquisitions involve substantial risks, including:

In addition, if we finance acquisitions by issuing equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities, our existing stockholders' interests would be diluted, which, in turn, could adversely impact the market price of our stock. Moreover, we could finance an acquisition with debt, resulting in higher leverage and interest costs.

Our laser treatments of psoriasis, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis and leukoderma and any of our future products or services may fail to gain market acceptance, which could adversely affect our competitive position.

We have generated limited worldwide commercial distribution for our products. Our XTRAC systems are installed at physician offices at no upfront charge to the physician and we are paid on a per-usage method where we retain ownership of the system. We cannot assure you that our products and services will find sufficient acceptance in the marketplace under our sales strategies.

We also face a risk that other companies in the market for dermatological products and services may be able to provide dermatologists a higher overall return on investment and therefore compromise our ability to increase our base of users and ensure they engage in optimal usage of our products. If, for example, such other companies have products (such as Botox or topical creams for disease management) that require less time commitment from the dermatologist and yield an attractive return on a dermatologist's time and investment, we may find that our efforts to increase our base of users are hindered.

CPT codes for all procedures are subject to continued reevaluation. Should CMS reduce reimbursement for the CPT codes for XTRAC treatment we may see a decline in our recurring revenue business as well as a decline in new XTRAC installations.

Whether a treatment may be delegated and, if so, to whom and to what extent, are matters that may vary state by state, as these matters are within the province of the state medical boards. In states that may be more restrictive in such delegation, a physician may decline to adopt the XTRAC system into his or her practice, deeming it to be fraught with too many constraints and finding other outlets for the physician's time and staff time to be more remunerative. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in persuading such medical boards that a liberal standard for delegation is appropriate for the XTRAC system, based on its design for ease and safety of use. If we are not successful, we may find that even if a geographic region has wide insurance reimbursement, the region's physicians may decline to adopt the XTRAC system into their practices.

We therefore cannot assure you that the marketplace will be receptive to our excimer laser technology over competing products, services and therapies or that a cure will not be found for the underlying diseases we are focused on treating. Failure of our products to achieve market acceptance could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The success of our products depends on third-party reimbursement of patients' costs, which could result in potentially reduced prices or reduced demand and adversely affect our revenues and business operations.

Our ability to market our products successfully depends in large part on the extent to which various third parties are willing to reimburse patients or providers for the costs of medical procedures utilizing such products. These third parties include government authorities, private health insurers and other organizations, such as health maintenance organizations, whose patterns of reimbursement may change as a result of new standards for reimbursement determined by these third parties or because of the programs and policies enacted under the ACA.

Third-party payors are systematically challenging the prices charged for medical products and services. They may deny reimbursement if they determine that a prescribed device is not used in accordance with cost-effective treatment methods as determined by the payor, or is experimental, unnecessary or inappropriate. Further, although third parties may approve reimbursement, such approvals may be under terms and conditions that discourage use of the XTRAC system. Accordingly, if less costly drugs or other treatments are available, third-party payors may not authorize or may limit reimbursement for the use of our products, even if our products are safer or more effective than the alternatives.

In addition, medical insurance policies and treatment coverage have been and may be affected by the parameters of the ACA or successor policies enacted by the new administration. While the ACA's stated purpose is to expand access to coverage, it also mandates certain requirements regarding the types and limitations of insurance coverage. There can be no guarantee that the changes in coverage under the ACA will not affect the type and level of reimbursement for our products.

Although we have received reimbursement approvals from a majority of private healthcare plans for the XTRAC system, we cannot give assurance that these private plans will continue to adopt or maintain favorable reimbursement policies or accept the XTRAC system in its clinical role as a second-line therapy in the treatment of psoriasis. Additionally, third-party payors may require further clinical studies or changes to our pricing structure and revenue model before authorizing or continuing reimbursement.

As of March 9, 2017, we estimate, based on published coverage policies and on payment practices of private and Medicare insurance plans, that more than 90% of the insured population in the U.S. is covered by insurance coverage or payment policies that reimburse physicians for using the XTRAC system for treatment of psoriasis. We can give no assurance that health insurers will not adversely modify their reimbursement policies for the use of the XTRAC system in the future.

Any failure in our customer education efforts could significantly reduce product marketing.

It is important to the success of our marketing efforts to educate physicians and technicians how to properly use our products. We rely on physicians to spend their time and money to participate in our pre-installation educational sessions. Moreover, if physicians and technicians use our products improperly, they may have unsatisfactory patient outcomes or, in the case of the XTRAC system, cause patient injury, which may give rise to negative publicity or lawsuits against us, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, revenues and profitability.

If revenue from a significant customer declines, we may have difficulty replacing the lost revenue, which would negatively affect our results and operations.

In our international business, we depend for a material portion of our sales in the international arena on several key sub-distributors, and especially on The Lotus Global Group, Inc., doing business as GlobalMed Technologies Co., or GlobalMed, which is our master distributor over the XTRAC and VTRAC products. If we lose GlobalMed or one of these sub-distributors, our sales of phototherapy products are likely to suffer in the short term, which could have a negative effect on our revenues and profitability.

If we fail to manage our sales and marketing force or to market and distribute our products effectively, we may experience diminished revenues and profits.

There are significant risks involved in building and managing our sales and marketing force and marketing our products, including our ability:

To increase acceptance and utilization of our products, we may have to expand our sales and marketing programs in the U.S. While we may be able to draw on currently available personnel within our organization to meet this need, we also expect that we will have to increase the number of representatives devoted to the sales and marketing programs and to broaden, through such representatives, the talents we have at our disposal. In some cases, we may look outside our organization for assistance in marketing our products.

We are reliant on a limited number of suppliers for production of our products.

Production of our products requires specific component parts obtained from our suppliers. While we believe that we could find alternate suppliers, in the event that our suppliers fail to meet our needs, a change in suppliers or any significant delay in our ability to have access to such resources could have a material adverse effect on our delivery schedules, business, operating results and financial condition. Moreover, in the event we can no longer utilize this supplier or acquire this resource and must identify a new supplier or substitute a different resource, such change may trigger an obligation for us to comply with additional FDA regulatory requirements including, but not limited to, pre-marketing authorization and QSR requirements.

Our failure to respond to rapid changes in technology and our applications in the medical devices industry or the development of a cure for skin conditions treated by our products could make our treatment system obsolete.

The medical device industry is subject to rapid and substantial technological development and product innovations. To be successful, we must respond to new developments in technology, new applications of existing technology and new treatment methods. Our financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected if we fail to be responsive on a timely and effective basis to competitors' new devices, applications, treatments or price strategies. For example, the development of a cure for psoriasis, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis or leukoderma would eliminate the need for our XTRAC system for these diseases and would require us to focus on other uses of our technology, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects.

As we develop new products or improve our existing products, we may accelerate the economic obsolescence of the existing, unimproved products and their components. The obsolete products and related components may have little to no resale value, leading to an increase in the reserves we have against our inventory. Likewise, there is a risk that the new products or improved existing products may not achieve market acceptance and therefore may also lead to an increase in the reserves against our inventory.

On March 13, 2017 we notified the FDA that, as of September 30, 2017, we will no longer service the MelaFind device. There is a risk that customers who purchased the device may make claims for repayment of their purchase price or other demands for payment, although we believe this risk is minimal. Additionally, as the device is subject to both FDA requirements and requirements of certain foreign countries in which the device is still in use, we cannot assure you that a government agency may make a demand that we either continue to provide support or recall devices still in use and thereby increase our costs and expenses.

Our customers, or physicians and technicians, as the case may be, may misuse certain of our products, and product liability lawsuits and other damages imposed on us may exceed our insurance coverage, or we may be subject to claims that are not covered by insurance.

We may be subject to product liability claims from time to time. Our products are highly complex and some are used to treat delicate skin conditions on and near a patient's face. In addition, the clinical testing, manufacturing, marketing and use of certain of our products and procedures may also expose us to product liability, FDA regulatory and/or legal actions, or other claims. If a physician elects to apply an off-label use and the use leads to injury, we may be involved in costly litigation. In addition, the fact that we train technicians whom we do not supervise in the use of our XTRAC system during patient treatment may expose us to third-party claims if those doing the training are accused of providing inadequate training. We presently maintain liability insurance with coverage limits of at least $5,000,000 per occurrence and overall aggregate, which we believe is an adequate level of product liability insurance, but product liability insurance is expensive and we might not be able to obtain product liability insurance in the future on acceptable terms or in sufficient amounts to protect us, if at all. A successful claim brought against us in excess of our insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, continuing insurance coverage may also not be available at an acceptable cost, if at all. Therefore, we may not be able to obtain insurance coverage that will be adequate to satisfy a liability that may arise. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, product liability claims may result in decreased demand for a product, injury to its reputation, withdrawal of clinical trial volunteers and loss of revenues. As a result, regardless of whether we are insured, a product liability claim or product recall may result in losses that could result in the FDA taking legal or regulatory enforcement action against us and or our products including recall, and could have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We must comply with complex statutes prohibiting fraud and abuse, and both we and physicians utilizing our products could be subject to significant penalties for noncompliance.

There are extensive federal and state laws and regulations prohibiting fraud and abuse in the healthcare industry that can result in significant criminal and civil penalties. These federal laws include:

As federal and state budget pressures continue, federal and state administrative agencies may also continue to escalate investigation and enforcement efforts to root out waste and to control fraud and abuse in governmental healthcare programs. Private enforcement of healthcare fraud has also increased, due in large part to amendments to the Civil False Claims Act in 1986 that were designed to encourage private persons to sue on behalf of the government. A violation of any of these federal and state fraud and abuse laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and financial condition. An investigation into the use of our products by physicians may dissuade physicians from either purchasing or using our products and could have a material adverse effect on our revenues.

If the effectiveness and safety of our devices are not supported by long-term data, and the level of acceptance of our products by dermatologists does not increase or is not maintained, our revenues could decline.

Our products may not be accepted in the market if we do not produce clinical data supported by the independent efforts of clinicians. We received clearance from the FDA for the use of the XTRAC system to treat psoriasis based upon our study of a limited number of patients. Safety and efficacy data presented to the FDA for the XTRAC system was based on studies on these patients. For the treatment of vitiligo, atopic dermatitis and leukoderma, we have received clearance from the FDA for the use of the XTRAC system based primarily on a showing of substantial equivalence to other previously cleared predicate devices. However, we may discover that physicians will expect clinical data on such treatments with the XTRAC system. We also may find that data from longer-term psoriasis patient follow-up studies may be inconsistent with those indicated by our relatively short-term data. If longer-term patient studies or clinical experience indicate that treatment with the XTRAC system does not provide patients with sustained benefits or that treatment with our product is less effective or less safe than our current data suggests, our revenues could decline. In addition, the FDA could then bring legal or regulatory enforcement actions against us and/or our products including, but not limited to, recalls or requirements for pre-market 510(k) authorizations. We can give no assurance that our data will be substantiated in studies involving more patients. In such a case, we may never achieve significant revenues or profitability.

Our failure to obtain or maintain necessary FDA clearances or approvals, or equivalents thereof in the U.S. and relevant foreign markets, could hurt our ability to distribute and market our products.

In both our U.S. and foreign markets, we are affected by extensive laws, governmental regulations, administrative determinations, court decisions and similar constraints. Such laws, regulations and other constraints may exist at the federal, state or local levels in the U.S. and at analogous levels of government in foreign jurisdictions. In addition, the formulation, manufacturing, packaging, labeling, distribution, importation, sale and storage of our products are subject to extensive regulation by various federal agencies, including, but not limited to, the FDA and the FTC, State Attorneys General in the U.S., as well as by various other federal, state, local and international regulatory authorities in the countries in which its products are manufactured, distributed or sold. If we or our manufacturers fail to comply with those regulations, we could become subject to significant penalties or claims, which could harm our results of operations or our ability to conduct our business. In addition, the adoption of new regulations or changes in the interpretations of existing regulations may result in significant compliance costs or discontinuation of product sales and may impair the marketing of our products, resulting in significant loss of net sales. Our failure to comply with federal or state regulations, or with regulations in foreign markets that cover our product claims and advertising, including direct claims and advertising by us, may result in enforcement actions and imposition of penalties or otherwise harm the distribution and sale of its products. Further, our businesses are subject to laws governing our accounting, tax and import and export activities. Failure to comply with these requirements could result in legal and/or financial consequences that might adversely affect our sales and profitability. Each medical device that we wish to market in the U.S. must first receive either 510(k) clearance or PMA from the FDA unless an exemption applies. Either process can be lengthy and expensive. The FDA's 510(k) clearance process may take from three to twelve months, or longer, and may or may not require human clinical data. The PMA process is much more costly and lengthy. It may take from eleven months to three years, or even longer, and will likely require significant supporting human clinical data. Delays in obtaining regulatory clearance or approval could adversely affect our revenues and profitability. Although we have obtained a PMA for the MelaFind system to aid in the diagnosis of melanoma and 510(k) clearances for our XTRAC system for use in treating psoriasis, vitiligo, atopic

dermatitis and leukoderma, these approvals and clearances may be subject to revocation if post-marketing data demonstrates safety issues or lack of effectiveness. Similar clearance processes may apply in foreign countries. Further, more stringent regulatory requirements or safety and quality standards may be issued in the future with an adverse effect on our business.

If required, clinical trials necessary to support a 510(k) notice or PMA application will be expensive and will require the enrollment of large numbers of patients, and suitable patients may be difficult to identify and recruit. Delays or failures in our clinical trials will prevent us from commercializing any modified or new products and will adversely affect our business, operating results and prospects.

Initiating and completing clinical trials necessary to support a 510(k) notice or a PMA application will be time-consuming and expensive and the outcome uncertain. Moreover, the results of early clinical trials are not necessarily predictive of future results, and any product we advance into clinical trials may not have favorable results in early or later clinical trials.

Conducting successful clinical studies will require the enrollment of large numbers of patients, and suitable patients may be difficult to identify and recruit. Patient enrollment in clinical trials and completion of patient participation and follow-up depend on many factors, including the size of the patient population, the nature of the trial protocol, the attractiveness of, or the discomforts and risks associated with, the treatments received by patients enrolled as subjects, the availability of appropriate clinical trial investigators, support staff, and proximity of patients to clinical sites and ability to comply with the eligibility and exclusion criteria for participation in the clinical trial and patient compliance. For example, patients may be discouraged from enrolling in our clinical trials if the trial protocol requires them to undergo extensive post-treatment procedures or follow-up to assess the safety and effectiveness of our products or if they determine that the treatments received under the trial protocols are not attractive or involve unacceptable risks or discomforts. Patients may also not participate in our clinical trials if they choose to participate in contemporaneous clinical trials of competitive products. In addition, patients participating in clinical trials may die before completion of the trial or suffer adverse medical events unrelated to investigational products.

Development of sufficient and appropriate clinical protocols to demonstrate safety and efficacy may be required and we may not adequately develop such protocols to support clearance and approval. Further, the FDA may require us to submit data on a greater number of patients than we originally anticipated and/or for a longer follow-up period or change the data collection requirements or data analysis for any clinical trials. Delays in patient enrollment or failure of patients to continue to participate in a clinical trial may cause an increase in costs and delays in the approval and attempted commercialization of our products or result in the failure of the clinical trial. The FDA may not consider our data adequate to demonstrate safety and efficacy. Such increased costs and delays or failures could adversely affect our business, operating results and prospects.

Our medical device operations are subject to pervasive and continuing FDA regulatory requirements.

Medical devices regulated by the FDA are subject to "general controls" which include: registration with the FDA; listing commercially distributed products with the FDA; complying with good manufacturing practices under the quality system regulations; filing reports with the FDA of and keeping records relative to certain types of adverse events associated with devices under the medical device reporting regulation; assuring that device labeling complies with device labeling requirements; reporting certain device field removals and corrections to the FDA; and obtaining premarket notification 510(k) clearance for devices prior to marketing. Some devices known as "510(k)-exempt" can be marketed without prior marketing clearance or approval from the FDA. In addition to the "general controls," some Class II medical devices are also subject to "special controls," including adherence to a particular guidance document and compliance with the performance standard. Instead of obtaining 510(k) clearance, some Class III devices are subject to PMA. In general, obtaining PMA to achieve marketing authorization from the FDA is a more onerous process than seeking 510(k) clearance.

Many medical devices, such as medical lasers, are also regulated by the FDA as "electronic products." In general, manufacturers and marketers of "electronic products" are subject to certain FDA regulatory requirements intended to ensure the radiological safety of the products. These requirements include, but are not limited to, filing certain reports with the FDA about the products and defects/safety issues related to the products as well as complying with radiological performance standards.

The medical device industry is now experiencing greater scrutiny and regulation by federal, state and foreign governmental authorities. Companies in our industry are subject to more frequent and more intensive reviews and investigations, often involving the marketing, business practices, and product quality management including standards for device recalls and product labeling. Such reviews and investigations may result in the civil and criminal proceedings; the imposition of substantial fines and penalties; the receipt of Warning Letters, untitled letters, demands for recalls or the seizure of our products; the requirement to enter into corporate integrity agreements, stipulated judgments or other administrative remedies, and result in our incurring substantial unanticipated costs and the diversion of key personnel and management's attention from their regular duties, any of which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity, and may result in greater and continuing governmental scrutiny of our business in the future.

We must also have the appropriate FDA clearances and/or approvals from other governmental entities in order to lawfully market devices and or/drugs. The FDA, federal, state or foreign governments and agencies may disagree that we have such clearance and/or approvals for all of our products and may take action to prevent the marketing and sale of such devices until such disagreements have been resolved.

Additionally, federal, state and foreign governments and entities have enacted laws and issued regulations and other standards requiring increased visibility and transparency of our interactions with healthcare providers. For example, the U.S. Physician Payment Sunshine Act requires us to disclose payments and other transfers of value to all U.S. physicians and U.S. teaching hospitals at the U.S. federal level made. Failure to comply with these legal and regulatory requirements could impact our business, and we have had and will continue to spend substantial time and financial resources to develop and implement enhanced structures, policies, systems and processes to comply with these legal and regulatory requirements, which may also impact our business.

Healthcare policy changes may have a material adverse effect on us.

Healthcare costs have risen significantly over the past decade. As a result, there have been and continue to be proposals by federal, state and foreign governments and regulators as well as third-party insurance providers to limit the growth of these costs. Among these proposals are regulations that could impose limitations on the prices we will be able to charge for our products, the amounts of reimbursement available for our products from governmental agencies or third-party payors, requirements regarding the usage of comparative studies, technology assessments and healthcare delivery structure reforms to determine the effectiveness and select the products and therapies used for treatment of patients. While we believe our products provide favorable clinical outcomes, value and cost efficiency, the resources necessary to demonstrate this value to our customers, patients, payors, and regulators is significant and may require longer periods of time and effort in which to obtain acceptance of our products. There is no assurance that our efforts will be successful, and these limitations could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

These changes and additional proposed changes in the future could adversely affect the demand for our products as well as the way in which we conduct our business. For example, the ACA was enacted into law in the U.S. in March 2010. The law imposed on medical device manufacturers a 2.3 percent excise tax on U.S. sales of Class I, II and III medical devices, which includes certain products marketed and sold by us, as well as requiring research into the effectiveness of treatment modalities and instituting changes to the reimbursement and payment systems for patient treatments. In addition, governments and regulatory agencies continue to study and propose changes to the laws governing the clearance or approval, manufacture and marketing of medical devices, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

FDA regulations and guidance are often revised or reinterpreted by the FDA in ways that may significantly affect our business and our products. The FDA is currently exploring ways to modify its 510(k) clearance process. In addition, due to changes at the FDA in general, it has become increasingly more difficult to obtain 510(k) clearance as data requirements have increased. It is impossible to predict whether legislative changes will be enacted or FDA regulations, guidance or interpretations changed, and what the impact of such changes, if any, may be. However, any changes could make it more difficult for us to maintain or attain clearance or approval to develop and commercialize our products and technologies.

Various healthcare reform proposals have also emerged at the state level. We cannot predict what healthcare initiatives, if any, will be implemented at the federal or state level, or the effect any future legislation or regulation will have on us. However, an expansion in government's role in the U.S. healthcare industry may lower reimbursements for our products, reduce medical procedure volumes and adversely affect our business, possibly materially. In addition, if the excise taxes contained in the House or Senate health reform bills are enacted into law, our operating expenses resulting from such an excise tax and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

Our market acceptance in international markets requires regulatory approvals from foreign governments and may depend on third party reimbursement of participants' cost.

We have introduced our XTRAC and VTRAC products into markets in more than 30 countries in Europe, the Middle East, Asia, Australia, South Africa and parts of Central and South America through distributors. We cannot be certain that our salesforce and distributor network will be successful in marketing our products in these or other countries or that our distributors will purchase XTRAC or VTRAC systems beyond their current contractual obligations or in accordance with our expectations.

Even if we obtain and maintain the necessary foreign regulatory registrations or approvals, market acceptance of our products in international markets may be dependent, in part, upon the availability of reimbursement within applicable healthcare payment systems. Reimbursement and healthcare payment systems in international markets vary significantly by country, and include both government-sponsored healthcare and private insurance. We may seek international reimbursement approvals for our products, but we cannot assure you that any such approvals will be obtained in a timely manner, if at all. Failure to receive international reimbursement approvals in any given market could have a material adverse effect on the acceptance or growth of our products in that market or others.

We may become subject to claims of infringement or misappropriation of the intellectual property rights of others, which could prohibit us from shipping affected products, require us to obtain licenses from third parties or to develop non-infringing alternatives, and subject us to substantial monetary damages and injunctive relief. Our patents may also be subject to challenge on validity grounds, and our patent applications may be rejected.

Third parties could, in the future, assert infringement or misappropriation claims against us with respect to our current or future products. Whether a product infringes a patent involves complex legal and factual issues, the determination of which is often uncertain. Therefore, we cannot be certain that we have not infringed the intellectual property rights of such third parties. Our potential competitors may assert that some aspect of our products infringes their patents. There also may be existing patents of which we are unaware that one or more components of our products may inadvertently infringe.

Any infringement or misappropriation claim could cause us to incur significant costs, could place significant strain on our financial resources, divert management's attention from our business and harm our reputation. If the relevant patents were upheld as valid and enforceable and we were found to infringe, we could be prohibited from selling our product unless we could obtain licenses to use the technology covered by the patent or are able to design around the patent. We may be unable to obtain a license on terms acceptable to us, if at all, and we may not be able to redesign the affected product to avoid infringement.

A court could order us to pay compensatory damages for such infringement, plus prejudgment interest and could, in addition, treble the compensatory damages and award attorney fees. These damages could be substantial and could harm our reputation, business, financial condition and operating results. A court also could enter orders that temporarily, preliminarily or permanently enjoin us and our customers from making, using, selling, offering to sell or importing MelaFind, and/or could enter an order mandating that we undertake certain remedial activities. Depending on the nature of the relief ordered by the court, we could become liable for additional damages to third parties.

We rely on our patents, patent applications and other intellectual property rights to give us a competitive advantage. Whether a patent is valid, or whether a patent application should be granted, is a complex matter of science and law. Therefore we cannot be certain that, if challenged, our patents, patent applications and/or other intellectual property rights would be upheld. If one or more of those patents, patent applications and other intellectual property rights are invalidated, rejected or found unenforceable, those outcomes could reduce or eliminate any competitive advantage we might otherwise have had.

We may be subject, directly or indirectly, to federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations and could face substantial penalties if we are unable to fully comply with such laws.

While we do not control referrals of healthcare services or bill directly to Medicare, Medicaid or other third-party payors, many healthcare laws and regulations apply to our business. For example, we could be subject to healthcare fraud and abuse and patient privacy regulation and enforcement by both the federal government and the states in which we conduct our business. The healthcare laws and regulations that may affect our ability to operate include:

The medical device industry has been under heightened scrutiny as the subject of government investigations and regulatory or legal enforcement actions involving manufacturers who allegedly offered unlawful inducements to potential or existing customers in an attempt to procure their business, including arrangements with physician consultants. If our operations or arrangements are found to be in violation of any of the laws described above or any other governmental regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs and the curtailment or restructuring of its operations. Any penalties, damages, fines, exclusions, curtailment or restructuring of our operations could

adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our financial results. The risk of us being found in violation of these laws is increased by the fact that many of these laws are broad and their provisions are open to a variety of interpretations. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against that action and the underlying alleged violations, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert our management's attention from the operation of our business. If the physicians or other providers or entities with whom we do business are found to be non-compliant with applicable laws, they may be subject to sanctions, which could also have a negative impact on our business.

If we or our third-party manufacturers or suppliers fail to comply with the FDA's Quality System Regulation or any applicable state equivalent, our manufacturing operations could be interrupted and our potential product sales and operating results could suffer.

We and some of our third-party manufacturers and suppliers are required to comply with some or all of the FDA's drug Good Manufacturing Practices or its QSR, which delineates the design controls, document controls, purchasing controls, identification and traceability, production and process controls, acceptance activities, nonconforming product requirements, corrective and preventive action requirements, labeling and packaging controls, handling, storage, distribution and installation requirements, records requirements, servicing requirements, and statistical techniques potentially applicable to the production of our medical devices. We and our manufacturers and suppliers are also subject to the regulations of foreign jurisdictions regarding the manufacturing process if we market its products overseas. The FDA enforces the QSR through periodic and announced or unannounced inspections of manufacturing facilities. Our facilities have been inspected by the FDA and other regulatory authorities, and we anticipate that we and certain of our third-party manufacturers and suppliers will be subject to additional future inspections. If our facilities or those of our manufacturers or suppliers are found to be in non-compliance or fail to take satisfactory corrective action in response to adverse QSR inspectional findings, FDA could take legal or regulatory enforcement actions against us and/or our products, including but not limited to the cessation of sales or the recall of distributed products, which could impair our ability to produce our products in a cost-effective and timely manner in order to meet our customers' demands. We may also be required to bear other costs or take other actions that may have a negative impact on our future sales and our ability to generate profits.

Current regulations depend heavily on administrative interpretation. If the FDA does not believe that we are in substantial compliance with applicable FDA regulations, the agency could take legal or regulatory enforcement actions against us and/or our products. We are also subject to periodic inspections by the FDA, other governmental regulatory agencies, as well as certain third-party regulatory groups. Future interpretations made by the FDA or other regulatory bodies made during the course of these inspections may vary from current interpretations and may adversely affect our business and prospects. The FDA's and foreign regulatory agencies' statutes, regulations, or policies may change, and additional government regulation or statutes may be enacted, which could increase post-approval regulatory requirements, or delay, suspend, prevent marketing of any cleared / approved products or necessitate the recall of distributed products. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of adverse governmental regulation that might arise from future legislative or administrative action, either in the U.S. or abroad.

The medical device industry has been under heightened FDA scrutiny as the subject of government investigations and enforcement actions. If our operations and activities are found to be in violation of any FDA laws or any other governmental regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines and other legal and/or agency enforcement actions. Any penalties, damages, fines, or curtailment or restructuring of our operations or activities could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our financial results. The risk of us being found in violation of FDA laws is increased by the fact that many of these laws are broad and their provisions are open to a variety of interpretations. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend ourselves against that action and its underlying allegations, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert management's attention from the operation of our business. Where there is a dispute with a federal or state governmental agency that cannot be resolved to the mutual satisfaction of all relevant parties, we may determine that the costs, both real and contingent, are not justified by the commercial returns to us from maintaining the dispute or the product.

Various claims, design features or performance characteristics of our medical devices, that we regarded as permitted by the FDA without marketing clearance or approval, may be challenged by the FDA or state regulators. The FDA or state regulatory authorities may find that certain claims, design features or performance characteristics, in order to be made or included in the products, may have to be supported by further studies and marketing clearances or approvals, which could be lengthy, costly and possibly unobtainable.

If we fail to comply with ongoing regulatory requirements, or if we experience unanticipated problems with products, these products could be subject to restrictions or withdrawal from the market.

We are also subject to similar state requirements and licenses. Failure by us to comply with statutes and regulations administered by the FDA and other regulatory bodies, discovery of previously unknown problems with our products (including unanticipated adverse events or adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency), manufacturing problems, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, or failure to adequately respond to any FDA observations concerning these issues, could result in, among other things, any of the following actions:

If any of these actions were to occur, it would harm our reputation and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our medical products may in the future be subject to product recalls that could harm our reputation, business and financial results.

The FDA has the authority to require the recall of commercialized medical device products in the event of material deficiencies or defects in design or manufacture. In the case of the FDA, the authority to require a recall must be based on an FDA finding that there is a reasonable probability that the device would cause serious injury or death. Manufacturers may, under their own initiative, recall a product if any material deficiency in a device is found. A government-mandated or voluntary recall by us or one of our distributors could occur as a result of component failures, manufacturing errors, design or labeling defects or other deficiencies and issues. Recalls of any of our products would divert managerial and financial resources and have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. The FDA requires that certain classifications of recalls be reported to the FDA within ten working days after the recall is initiated. Companies are required to maintain certain records of recalls, even if they are not reportable to the FDA. We may initiate voluntary recalls involving our products in the future that we determine do not require notification of the FDA. If the FDA disagrees with our determinations, they could require us to report those actions as recalls. A future recall announcement could harm our reputation with customers and negatively affect its sales. In addition, the FDA could take enforcement action for failing to report the recalls when they were conducted.

If any of our medical products cause or contribute to a death or a serious injury, or malfunction in certain ways, we will be subject to medical device reporting regulations, which can result in voluntary corrective actions or agency enforcement actions.

Under the FDA medical device reporting regulations, medical device manufacturers are required to report to the FDA information that a device has or may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or has malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to death or serious injury if the malfunction of the

device or one of our similar devices were to recur. If we fail to report these events to the FDA within the required timeframes, or at all, the FDA could take enforcement action against us. Any such adverse event involving our products also could result in future voluntary corrective actions, such as recalls or customer notifications, or agency action, such as inspection or enforcement action. Any corrective action, whether voluntary or involuntary, as well as defending ourselves in a lawsuit, will require our time and capital, distract management from operating our business, and may harm our reputation and financial results.

We have a need for operating funds and there is no guarantee that we will be able to generate those funds from our business.

Our capital and future revenue may not be sufficient to support the expenses of our operations in the near term, although based upon our current budgeting and projected cash flow models, we believe that we will be able to support our operations for at least the next twelve months following the filing of this Form 10-K. We plan to fund operations by the recurring revenue generated by the use of the XTRAC lasers in the U.S. plus sales of the XTRAC and VTRAC units internationally. If revenues from the sale and use of our existing products are inadequate to fund our operations, we may need to raise additional financing. We cannot assure you that we will be able to raise additional capital or secure alternate financing to fund operations, if necessary, or that we will be able to raise additional capital under terms that are favorable to us. Further, we cannot assure that the Acquisition will in any way negate or mitigate our need for future capital. Any additional financing may dilute the ownership interest of our existing stockholders and could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

If we do not have enough capital to fund operations, then we will have to cut costs or raise funds.

If we are unable to raise additional funds, if necessary, under terms acceptable to us and in the interests of our stockholders, then we will have to take measures to cut operating costs or obtain funds using alternative methods, such as:

If it became necessary to take one or more of the above-listed actions, then our perceived valuation may be lower, which could impact the market price of our stock. Further, the effects on our operations, financial performance and stock price may be significant if we do not or cannot take one or more of the above-listed actions in a timely manner and when needed, and our ability to do so may be limited significantly due to the instability of the global financial markets and the resulting limitations on available financing to us and to potential licensees, buyers and investors. Additionally these options may not be available to us as all of our assets have been pledged as security for the various financings.

Risks Relating to the 2015 Financing

The debentures we issued in June 2015 (the "Debentures") contain covenants that could limit our financing options and liquidity position, which would limit our ability to grow our business.

The Debentures contain certain covenants and representations limiting our ability to incur additional indebtedness, other than specified permitted indebtedness, and from entering into or creating any liens on our assets, other than certain permitted liens. These restrictions may limit our ability to obtain additional financing, withstand downturns in our business or take advantage of business opportunities. Moreover, additional debt financing we may seek may contain terms that include more restrictive covenants, may require repayment on an accelerated schedule or may impose other obligations that limit our ability to grow our business, acquire needed assets, or take other actions we might otherwise consider appropriate or desirable.

Our failure to avoid events of default as defined in the Debentures could require us to redeem such Debentures at a premium.

The Debentures provide that, upon the occurrence of an "Event of Default," the interest rate on the Debentures increases to 12%. Events of Default under the Debentures include, among other things: (1) suspension or removal from the Nasdaq Capital Market or other permissible trading market for specified time periods; (2) failure to pay principal, interest, late charges and other amounts due under the Debentures; (3) certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency of our company; and (4) failure to make payment with respect to any indebtedness in excess of $150,000 to any third party, or the occurrence of a default or event of default under certain agreements binding our company. In addition, upon an Event of Default, the Debentures become, at the holder's election, immediately due and payable.

Our ability to avoid such Events of Default may be affected by changes in our business condition or results of our operations, or other events beyond our control. If we were to experience an Event of Default and the holders elected to have us redeem their Debentures, we may not have sufficient resources to do so, and we may have to seek additional debt or equity financing to cover the costs of redeeming the Debentures. Any additional debt or equity financing that we may need may not be available on terms favorable to us, or at all.

We are required to remain listed on a nationally recognized stock exchange and failure to maintain that listing would be a default under the debenture. (See "Risks Related to Our Common Stock.")

Issuance of shares of our common stock upon the exercise of options or warrants and upon conversion of convertible debentures will dilute the ownership interest of our existing stockholders and could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

The exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants and conversions of outstanding convertible debentures, including the Debentures and the Warrants, and the sales of stock issuable pursuant to them would reduce a stockholder's percentage voting and ownership interest. The exercise, or potential exercise, of these options and warrants and the conversion, or potential conversion, of the debentures could adversely affect the market price of our common stock and the terms on which we could obtain additional financing. The ownership interest of our existing stockholders may be further diluted through adjustments to certain outstanding Warrants and Debentures under the terms of their anti-dilution provisions.

We may become obligated to pay liquidated damages if we fail to file, obtain effectiveness and maintain effectiveness of a registration statement under a registration rights agreement we entered into with the Selling Stockholders.

We have granted to the Purchasers resale registration rights with respect to the shares of common stock underlying the Debentures and the Warrants pursuant to the terms of a registration rights agreement. In addition to the registration rights, the Selling Stockholders are entitled to receive liquidated damages upon the occurrence of a number of events relating to filing, becoming effective and maintaining an effective registration statement covering the shares underlying the Debentures and the Warrants. The liquidated damages will be payable upon the occurrence of each of those events and each monthly anniversary thereof until cured. The amount of liquidated damages payable is equal to 2.0% of the aggregate purchase price paid by each Purchaser, provided, however, the maximum aggregate liquidated damages payable to a Purchaser shall be 12% of the aggregate subscription amount paid by such Purchaser pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. The liquidated damages shall accrue interest at a rate of 12% per annum (or such lesser maximum amount that is permitted to be paid by applicable law), accruing on a daily basis for each event until such event is cured.

Risks Relating to the December 30, 2015 Financing (the "Refinancing")

If we fail to abide by the terms and conditions of the Refinancing, the secured lenders have the right to proceed against our intellectual property and other assets pursuant to their first priority security interest.

On December 30, 2015, we entered into a $12.0 million credit facility pursuant to a Credit and Security Agreement (the "Agreement") and related financing documents with MidCap Financial Trust ("MidCap") and the lenders listed in the loan documents. We have drawn down the full $12.0 million available to us. Our obligations under the credit facility are secured by a first priority lien on all of our assets. Other financing documents included subordination agreements and other amendments with our existing debenture holders from its 2014 and 2015 financings. Our commitments under the Agreement require that we maintain our listing on a nationally recognized stock exchange. (See "Risks Related to our Common Stock." Our failure to abide by our on-going obligations under the loan documents could result in the lender seizing our assets.

Risks Relating to Our Common Stock

We are not currently in compliance with the $1.00 minimum bid Nasdaq listing requirement. Failure to maintain the listing of our common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market could adversely affect us, including our ability to maintain compliance with certain debt covenants and to raise funds.

On April 27, 2016, we received a letter (the "Notice") from the Listing Qualifications Staff of the NASDAQ Stock Market (the "Staff") notifying us that we are not in compliance with the $1.00 minimum closing bid price requirement under the NASDAQ Listing Rules (the "Listing Rules"). The Listing Rules require listed securities to maintain a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share. If a NASDAQ-listed company trades below the minimum bid price requirement for 30 consecutive business days, it is notified of the deficiency. Based upon the Staff's review, we no longer satisfy this requirement. The Listing Rules provide us with a compliance period of 180 calendar days, or until October 24, 2016, to regain compliance with this requirement.

To regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement, we must have a closing bid price of $1.00 per share or more for a minimum of ten consecutive business days during this compliance period. In the event that we do not regain compliance within this period, we may be eligible for additional time to regain compliance by satisfying certain requirements. However, if it appears to the Staff that we will not be able to cure the deficiency, or if we are otherwise not eligible, the Staff will notify us that our common stock will be delisted from the NASDAQ Capital Market. We may appeal the Staff's determination to delist our common stock to a Hearing Panel. During any appeal process, our common stock would continue to trade on the NASDAQ Capital Market. The Notice has no immediate effect on the listing or trading of our common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market.

We did not regain compliance during the cure period which ran for 180 days and began on April 27, 2016.

On October 25, 2016, we were notified by NASDAQ that NASDAQ had granted us an extension of the deadline to April 24, 2017 to demonstrate compliance with NASDAQ's continued listing requirements.

We will continue to monitor the closing bid price for our common stock and to assess our options for maintaining the listing of its common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market in light of the Notice. Failure to maintain the listing of our common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market would lead to an event of default under the debentures issued in our 2015 financing. Also, if delisting were to occur, selling our common stock could be more difficult because smaller quantities of shares would likely be bought and sold, transactions could be delayed, and security analysts' coverage of us may be reduced. Furthermore, while we believe that our common stock would trade on the OTC Bulletin Board, we would lose various advantages attendant to listing on a national securities exchange, including but not limited to, eligibility to register the sale or resale of our shares on Form S-3 and the automatic exemption from registration under state securities laws for exchange-listed securities, which could have a negative effect on our ability to raise funds. Additionally it would be deemed a default under the 2015 debentures and a breach of our affirmative covenants and therefore an event of default under our financing documents with Midcap.

As one approach to curing the listing deficiency, we have asked the Shareholders to approve a reverse stock-split of up to 1 for 10 of our common stock. We have scheduled the meeting for March 29, 2017 and we cannot assure you that we will have the necessary quorum to hold a vote on the proposal, or that if we do have a quorum that there will be a majority of shares cast in favor of authorizing the company to effect a reverse split.

If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, our ability to provide accurate financial statements could be impaired and any failure to maintain our internal controls could have an adverse effect on our stock price.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("SOX"), as well as rules implemented by the SEC, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the Nasdaq Stock Market, have required changes in the corporate governance practices of public companies. Monitoring compliance with the existing rules and implementing changes required by these rules is expensive and may increase our legal and financial compliance costs, divert management attention from operations and strategic opportunities, and make legal, accounting and administrative activities more time-consuming. Since 2008, we have retained a consultant experienced in SOX that assists us in the process of instituting changes to our internal procedures to satisfy the requirements of the SOX. We have evaluated our internal control systems in order to allow us to report on our internal controls, as required by Section 404 of the SOX. See Item 9A included herein. As a small company with limited capital and human resources, we may need to divert management's time and attention away from our business in order to ensure continued compliance with these regulatory requirements. We may require new information technologies systems, the auditing of our internal controls, and compliance training for our directors, officers and personnel. Such efforts may entail a significant expense. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the SOX. Any failure to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls could have an adverse effect on timely and accurate financial reporting and the trading price of our common stock.

Our stock price may be volatile, meaning purchasers of our common stock could incur substantial losses.

Our stock price has been and is likely to continue to be volatile. The stock market in general and the market for medical technology companies in particular have experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. The following factors, in addition to other risk factors described in this section and general market and economic conditions, may have a significant impact on the market price of our common stock:

A decline in the market price of our common stock could cause you to lose some or all of your investment, limit your ability to sell your shares of stock and may adversely impact our ability to attract and retain employees and raise capital. In addition, stockholders have, and may in the future, initiate securities class action lawsuits if the market price of our stock drops significantly. Whether or not meritorious, litigation brought against us could result in substantial costs and could divert the time and attention of our management. Our insurance to cover claims of this sort may not be adequate.

Our charter documents and Delaware law may inhibit a takeover that stockholders consider favorable and could also limit the market price of our stock.

Provisions of our restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws and applicable provisions of Delaware law may make it more difficult for or prevent a third party from acquiring control of us without the approval of our board of directors. These provisions:

In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law generally limits our ability to engage in any business combination with certain persons who own 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock or any of our associates or affiliates who at any time in the past three years have owned 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock.

These provisions may have the effect of entrenching our management team and may deprive you of the opportunity to sell your shares to potential acquirers at a premium over prevailing prices. This potential inability to obtain a control premium could reduce the price of our common stock.

Item 1B.          Unresolved Staff Comments

There are no unresolved comments from the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 2.

Properties

We lease a 10,672 sq. ft. facility in Horsham, Pennsylvania that houses our executive offices and marketing. The term of the lease runs through November 30, 2018.

We lease 28,000 sq. ft. facility consisting of office, manufacturing and warehousing space in Carlsbad, California. The lease expires on September 30, 2017. Our Carlsbad facility houses the manufacturing and development operations for our excimer laser business, as well as the patient call center and reimbursement center.

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

From time to time in the ordinary course of our business, we may be a party to certain legal proceedings, incidental to the normal course of our business. These may include controversies relating to contract claims and employment related matters, some of which claims may be material, in which case, we will make separate disclosure as required.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

As of March 9, 2017, we had 10,909,490 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. This did not include (i) options to purchase 4,500,522 shares of common stock, of which 2,222,046 were vested as of March 9, 2017, (ii) warrants to purchase up to 12,033,098 shares of common stock, all of which warrants were vested or (iii) convertible debentures convertible into 46,005,715 shares of common stock.

Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market ("Nasdaq") under the symbol "SSKN." The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing sale prices per share of our common stock:

On March 9, 2017, the last reported sale price for our common stock on Nasdaq was $0.59 per share. As of March 9, 2017, we had approximately 69 stockholders of record, without giving effect to determining the number of stockholders who held shares in "street name" or other nominee accounts.

Dividend Policy

We have not declared or paid any dividend on our common stock, since our inception. We do not anticipate that any dividends on our common stock will be declared or paid in the future.

Any future determination relating to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on then existing conditions, including our earnings, financial condition, results of operations, level of indebtedness, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects and other factors our board of directors may deem relevant. Our board of directors' ability to declare a dividend is also subject to limits imposed by Delaware law.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following is a summary of all of our equity compensation plans, including plans that were assumed through acquisitions and individual arrangements that provide for the issuance of equity securities as compensation, as of December 31, 2016. See Notes 1 and 14 to the consolidated financial statements for additional discussion.

Recent Issuances of Unregistered Securities

None.

Purchases of Equity Securities

None.

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

Not applicable.

Item 7.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following financial data, in this narrative, are expressed in thousands, except for the earnings per share. The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Report. Dollar amounts are reported in thousands, except per share and per treatment data.

Introduction, Outlook and Overview of Business Operations

We are a medical technology company dedicated to developing and commercializing innovative products for the treatment of dermatological disorders. In June 2015, we completed the acquisition of the XTRAC System and the VTRAC System businesses from PhotoMedex, Inc. The XTRAC and VTRAC products are FDA cleared devices for the treatment of psoriasis, vitiligo and other skin disorders. The purchase price was $42,403 plus the assumption of certain business-related liabilities. Management believes that these businesses acquired create a platform on which to transform STRATA into a leading medical dermatology company. Management further believes that the cash flow generated by these businesses will be sufficient to finance our operations for the at least the next twelve months following the filing of this Form 10-K.

The XTRAC device is utilized to treat psoriasis, vitiligo and other skin diseases. The XTRAC device received FDA clearance in 2000 and has since become a widely recognized treatment among dermatologists. The system delivers targeted 308um ultraviolet light to affected areas of skin, leading to psoriasis clearing and vitiligo repigmentation, following a series of treatments. As of December 31, 2016, there were 775 XTRAC systems placed in dermatologists' offices in the United States under our recurring revenue model, up from 718 at the end of December 2015. Under the recurring revenue model, the XTRAC system is placed in a physician's office and revenue is recognized on a per procedure basis. The XTRAC system's use for psoriasis is covered by nearly all major insurance companies, including Medicare. The VTRAC Excimer Lamp system, offered internationally in addition to the XTRAC system, provides targeted therapeutic efficacy demonstrated by excimer technology with the simplicity of design and reliability of a lamp system. There are approximately 7.5 million people in the United States and up to 125 million people worldwide suffering from psoriasis, and 1% to 2% of the world's population suffers from vitiligo. In 2016, over 351,000 XTRAC laser treatments were performed on approximately 22,000 patients in the United States.

The financial results of the XTRAC and VTRAC businesses have been included in the results of operations subsequent to June 22, 2015, the date of the acquisition. The assets of the acquired businesses and liabilities assumed have been consolidated as of June 22, 2015.

We are in the process of discontinuing our efforts to develop and commercialize the MelaFind System. MelaFind is a non-invasive, point-of-care (i.e., in the doctor's office) instrument designed to aid in the dermatologists' decision to biopsy pigmented skin lesions, particularly melanoma. We have been unsuccessful in commercializing the MelaFind product in a way that would bring financial benefit to our shareholders. In March 2017, we sent a notice to the 90 owners of MelaFind devices in the United States informing them that, effective September 30, 2017, we no longer had the resources to continue to support the device and that our inventory of spare parts was being offered for sale to them on a first-come, first-serve basis.

Key Technology

Sales and Marketing

As of December 31, 2016, our sales and marketing personnel consisted of 48 full-time employees, inclusive of a direct sales organization as well as an in-house call center staffed with patient advocates and a reimbursement group that provides necessary insurance information to our physician partners and their patients.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in this Report are based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and disclosures at the date of the financial statements. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including, but not limited to, those related to revenue recognition, accounts receivable, inventories, impairment of property and equipment and of intangibles and accruals for warranty claims. We use authoritative pronouncements, historical experience and other assumptions as the basis for making estimates. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Management believes that the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements. These critical accounting policies and the significant estimates made in accordance with these policies have been discussed with our Audit Committee.

Revenue Recognition.  We recognize revenues from product sales when the following four criteria have been met: (i) the product has been delivered and we have no significant remaining obligations; (ii) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (iii) the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collection is reasonably assured. Revenues from product sales are recorded net of provisions for expected returns and cash discounts.

We ship most of our products FOB shipping point, although from time to time certain customers, for example governmental customers, will be granted FOB destination terms. Among the factors we take into account when determining the proper time at which to recognize revenue are (i) when title to the goods transfers and (ii) when the risk of loss transfers. Shipments to distributors or physicians that do not fully satisfy the collection criteria are recognized when invoiced amounts are fully paid or fully assured and included in deferred revenues until that time.

For revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables within a single, contractually binding arrangement (usually sales of products with separately priced extended warranty), each element of the contract is accounted for as a separate unit of accounting when it provides the customer value on a stand-alone basis and there is objective evidence of the fair value of the related unit.

We have two distribution channels for our phototherapy treatment equipment. We either (i) place our lasers in a physician's office (at no charge to the physician) and generally charge the physician a fee for an agreed upon number of treatments or (ii) sell our lasers through a distributor or directly to a physician. In some cases, when the laser is placed in a physician's office at no charge, we and the customer stipulate to a quarterly or other periodic target of procedures to be performed, and accordingly revenue is recognized ratably over the period.

When we place a laser in a physician's office, we generally recognize revenue based on the number of patient treatments performed, or purchased under a periodic commitment, by the physician. Amounts collected with respect to treatments to be performed through laser-access codes that are sold to physicians free of a periodic commitment, but not yet used, are deferred and recognized as a liability until the physician performs the treatment. Unused treatments remain our obligation because the treatments can only be performed on our-owned equipment. Once the treatments are performed, this obligation has been satisfied.

We defer substantially all revenue from sales of treatment codes ordered by and performed by our customers within the last two weeks of the period in determining the amount of procedures performed by our customers. Management believes this approach closely approximates the actual amount of unused treatments that exist at the end of a period.

For our MelaFind products, we utilize a direct sales force which sells the system to the physician's office and we recognize revenue upon shipment of the system to the purchaser after receipt of the fully-executed purchase agreement.

Inventory.  We account for inventory at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined to be purchased cost for raw materials and the production cost (materials, labor and indirect manufacturing cost) for work-in-process and finished goods. The cost is determined on the first-in, first-out method. Throughout the laser manufacturing process, the related production costs are recorded within inventory. Work-in-process is immaterial, given the typically short manufacturing cycle, and therefore is disclosed in conjunction with raw materials. We perform full physical inventory counts for XTRAC and cycle counts on the other inventory to maintain controls and obtain accurate data.

Our XTRAC laser is either (i) sold to distributors or physicians directly or (ii) placed in a physician's office and remains our property. The cost to build a laser, whether for sale or for placement, is accumulated in inventory. When a laser is placed in a physician's office, the cost is transferred from inventory to "lasers in service" within property and equipment. At times, units are shipped to distributors, but revenue is not recognized until all of the revenue recognition criteria have been met, and until that time, the unit is carried on our books as inventory. Revenue is not recognized from these distributors until payment is either assured or paid in full.

Reserves for slow-moving, excess and obsolete inventories, reduce the historical carrying value of our inventories, and are provided based on historical experience and product demand. Management evaluates the adequacy of these reserves periodically based on forecasted sales and market trends.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.  Accounts receivable are reduced by an allowance for amounts that may become uncollectible in the future. From time to time, our customers dispute the amounts due to us, and, in other cases, our customers experience financial difficulties and cannot pay on a timely basis. In certain instances, these factors ultimately result in uncollectible accounts. The determination of the appropriate reserve needed for uncollectible accounts involves significant judgment. Such factors include changes in the financial condition of our customers as a result of industry, economic or customer-specific factors. A change in the factors used to evaluate collectability could result in a significant change in the allowance needed. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, allowance for doubtful accounts was $135 and $45, respectively.

Property and Equipment.  As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, we had net property and equipment of $10,180 and $13,851, respectively. The most significant component relates to the XTRAC lasers placed by us in physicians' offices. We own the equipment and charge the physician on a per-treatment basis for use of the equipment. The recoverability of the net carrying value of the lasers is predicated on continuing revenues from the physicians' use of the lasers. If the physician does not generate sufficient treatments, then we may remove the laser from the physician's office and redeploy it elsewhere. XTRAC lasers placed in service are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of five-years. For other property and equipment depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, primarily three to seven years for computer hardware and software, furniture and fixtures, automobiles and machinery and equipment. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the useful lives or lease terms. Useful lives are determined based upon an estimate of either physical or economic obsolescence, or both.

Goodwill and Intangibles Assets.  Our balance sheet includes goodwill and other intangible assets which affect the amount of future period amortization expense and possible impairment expense that we will incur. Management's judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators, on an interim or annual basis, are based on various factors, including market conditions and operational performance of our business. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, we had $22,215 and $24,155 of goodwill and other intangibles, accounting for 51.4% and 47.0% of our total assets, respectively. The goodwill is not amortizable; the other intangibles are. The determination of the value of such intangible assets requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect our consolidated financial statements. We test our goodwill for impairment at least annually. The acquisition of the XTRAC and VTRAC businesses that gave rise to the recorded goodwill closed on June 22, 2015. This test is conducted in December of each year in connection with the annual budgeting and forecast process. Also, on a quarterly basis, we evaluate whether events or changes in circumstances have occurred that would negatively impact the realizable value of our intangibles or goodwill.

We organized our business into three operating units and are defined as Dermatology Recurring Procedures, Dermatology Procedures Equipment and Dermatology Imaging. The balance of our goodwill for each of our segments as of December 31, 2016 is as follows: Dermatology Recurring Procedures $7,958, Dermatology Procedures Equipment $845 and Dermatology Imaging $0. We completed our annual goodwill impairment analysis as of December 31, 2016 for our reporting units. Our assessment concluded that there was not any impairment of goodwill. Our analysis employed the use of both a market and income approach, with each method given equal weighting. Significant assumptions used in the income approach include growth and discount rates, margins and our weighted average cost of capital. We used historical performance and management estimates of future performance to determine margins and growth rates. Discount rates selected for each reporting unit varied. Our weighted average cost of capital included a review and assessment of market and capital structure assumptions. Of the two reporting units with goodwill, Dermatology Recurring Procedures has a fair value that is in excess of its carrying value by approximately 16.7%, while Dermatology Procedures Equipment has a fair value that is approximately 48.8% in excess of its carrying value. Considerable management judgment is necessary to evaluate the impact of operating changes and to estimate future cash flows. Changes in our actual results and/or estimates or any of our other assumptions used in our analysis could result in a different conclusion.

Income taxes. As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process requires us to estimate our actual current tax exposure and make an assessment of temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheet. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent we believe that recovery is more likely than not, we establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or increase this allowance in a period, we must include an expense within the tax provision in the consolidated statement of operations. Significant management judgment is required in determining our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. In the event that we generate taxable income in the jurisdictions in which we operate and in which we has net operating loss carry-forwards, we may be required to adjust our valuation allowance.

ASC Topic 740-10 requires that we recognize in our financial statements the impact of a tax position, if that position will more likely than not be sustained upon examination, based on the technical merits of the position, without regard the likelihood that the tax position may be challenged. If an uncertain tax position meets the "more-likely-than-not" threshold, the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely to be recognized upon ultimate settlement with the taxing authority is recorded. We do not have any unrecognized tax benefits or accrued penalties and interest. If such matters were to arise, we would recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.

Stock-based compensation. We account for stock based compensation to employees in accordance with "Share-Based Payment" accounting standard. The standard requires estimating the fair value of equity-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as an expense over the requisite service periods in our consolidated statement of operations.

The fair value of employee stock options is estimated using a Black-Scholes valuation model. Compensation costs are recorded using the graded vesting attribution method over the vesting period, net of estimated forfeitures. The total share-based compensation expense was $113 and $1,753 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Fair Value Measurements.  We measure fair value in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("ASC Topic 820"). ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework and gives guidance regarding the methods used for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions there exists a three-tier fair-value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. Our derivative financial instruments are considered to be significant unobservable inputs (level 3).

Results of Operations (The following financial data, in this narrative, are expressed in thousands, except for the earnings per share.)

Revenues

The following table presents revenues from our three segments for the periods indicated below:

We completed the asset purchase of the XTRAC and VTRAC businesses on June 22, 2015 and as such, for the 2015 period, revenues were included only for the period of June 23, 2015 through December 31, 2015.

Recognized treatment revenue for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $24,558 which approximates 351,000 treatments, with prices from $65 to $95 per treatment. Recognized treatment revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $14,616 which approximates 194,000 treatments, with prices from $65 to $95 per treatment. Increases in procedures are dependent upon building market acceptance through marketing programs with our physician partners and their patients to show that the XTRAC procedures will be of clinical benefit and will be generally reimbursed by insurers. We believe that several factors have limited the growth of the use of XTRAC treatments from those who suffer from psoriasis and vitiligo. Specifically, we believe that awareness of the positive effects of XTRAC treatments has not been understood well enough among both sufferers and providers; and the treatment regimen requiring sometimes up to 12 or more treatments has limited XTRAC use to certain patient populations. Therefore, we have a direct to patient program for XTRAC advertising in the United States targeted at psoriasis and vitiligo patients through a variety of media

including television and radio; and through our use of social media such as FaceBook and Twitter. We continue to increase our advertising expenditures in this area to reach the more than 10 million patients in the United States afflicted with these diseases.

We defer substantially all sales of treatment codes ordered by and delivered to the customer within the last two weeks of the period in determining the amount of procedures performed by our physician-customers. Management believes this approach closely approximates the actual amount of unused treatments that existed at the end of a period. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, we deferred net revenues of $91 and $20, respectively, under this approach.

For the year ended December 31, 2016 dermatology equipment revenues were $7,065. Internationally, we sold 88 systems for the year ended December 31, 2016, 27 of which were VTRAC systems. Domestically, we sold 3 systems for the year ended December 31, 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2015 dermatology equipment revenues were $3,591. Internationally, we sold 52 systems for the year ended December 31, 2015, 31 of which were VTRAC systems.

For the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, imaging revenues were $134 and $288, respectively. Imaging revenues are generated from the MelaFind systems, through direct capital equipment sales and through a leasing model. Under the leasing model, there is an upfront installation fee and a monthly usage fee based on the number of lesions examined.

Cost of Revenues

The following table illustrates cost of revenues from our three business segments for the periods listed below:

As we completed the asset purchase of XTRAC and VTRAC businesses on June 22, 2015, cost of revenues for 2015, related to this business, was included from June 23, 2015 through December 31, 2015.

Cost of revenues have decreased to $12,636 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $13,719 for the year ended December 31, 2015. During the year ended December 31, 2015 we initiated plans to develop an updated version of the MelaFind system and, accordingly, determined that a majority of our existing inventory of MelaFind systems and related parts exceeded our requirements. As a result, we wrote-off the excess and obsolete inventory on our MelaFind systems and related components and incurred a charge of $4,818. We also had an impairment charge of $920 of property and equipment related to the MelaFind systems. Offsetting these expenses for the 2015 periods, were the XTRAC and VTRAC expenses that were included only from June 23, 2015 through December 31, 2015 compared to the entire period presented for 2016.

Gross Profit Analysis

Gross profit increased to $19,121 for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $4,776 during the same period in 2015. As a percentage of revenues, the gross margin was 60.2% for the year ended December 31, 2016 from 25.8% during the same period in 2015.

The following tables analyze changes in our gross margin, by segment, for the periods presented below:

The primary reason for the change in gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015, was the acquisition of the XTRAC and VTRAC businesses on June 22, 2015. The gross profit related to these businesses for the 2015 period was included from June 23, 2015 through December 31, 2015 and was allocated to the two Dermatology Procedures segments. Incremental treatments delivered on existing equipment incur negligible incremental costs, so increases and/or decreases on in those treatments have an impact on gross margin.

The primary reason for the change in gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015, was the acquisition of the XTRAC and VTRAC businesses on June 22, 2015. The gross profit related to these businesses for the 2015 periods was included from June 23, 2015 through December 31, 2015 and was allocated to the two Dermatology Procedures segments. The gross margin change is affected by the mix of products sold in each year.

The primary reason for the change in gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015, was during the year ended December 31, 2015 we had initiated plans to develop an updated version of the MelaFind system and, accordingly, determined that a majority of our existing inventory of MelaFind systems and related parts exceeded our requirements. As a result, we wrote-off the excess and obsolete inventory on our MelaFind systems and related components and incurred a charge of $4,818. We also had an impairment charge of $920 of property and equipment related to the MelaFind systems.

Engineering and Product Development

Engineering and product development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 remained consistent at $1,929 from $2,029 for the year ended December 31, 2015. As the XTRAC and VTRAC acquisition was completed on June 22, 2015, the expenses were included only from June 23, 2015 through December 31, 2015. Ongoing research and development efforts for the MelaFind technology on product enhancements have been ended.

Selling and Marketing Expenses

For the year ended December 31, 2016, selling and marketing expenses increased to $13,152 from $9,194 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase was related to the inclusion of sales and marketing expenses related to the acquired XTRAC and VTRAC businesses of $12,966 for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to $7,323 for the year ended December 31, 2015. As the XTRAC and VTRAC acquisition was completed on June 22, 2015, the expenses were included only from June 23, 2015 through December 31, 2015. Offsetting some of the increases, were decreases in the MelaFind Division primarily related to salary and headcount decreases and overall impact of cost reduction initiatives.

General and Administrative Expenses

For the year ended December 31, 2016, general and administrative expenses decreased to $7,637 from $10,028 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The changes were due to the following reasons:

Interest Expense, Net

Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $4,900 compared to $10,200 in the year ended December 31, 2015. Interest expense during the periods of 2016 and 2015 relate to the 4% senior convertible debentures issued in July 2014, which included amortization of the related debt discount and deferred financing fees. The periods also include interest expense related to the 2.25% senior convertible debentures issued on June 22, 2015. The 2015 periods included interest and related amortization of debt discount on the June 22, 2015 short-term senior notes. Additionally, approximately $217 of interest expense was recognized as a result of the conversion of $265 of debentures into common stock during the year ended December 31, 2016. Approximately $3,601 of interest expense was recognized as a result of the conversion of $4,815 of debentures into common stock during the year ended December 31, 2015.

Change in Fair Value of Warrant Liability

In accordance with FASB ASC 470, "Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options" ("ASC Topic 470") and FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("ASC Topic 820"), we measured the fair value of our warrants that were recorded at their fair value and recognized as liabilities as of December 31, 2016, and recorded $5,396 in other income for the year ended December 31, 2016. We measured the fair value of these warrants as of December 31, 2015, and recorded $1,814 in other income for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Other Income (Expense), net

Other income, net for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $21 compared to $33, for the year ended December 31, 2015. Other income mainly represents royalty income we earn each quarter from Kavo Dental GmbH on the licensing of certain technology patents.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $255 compared to $119 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The expense is comprised of the change in deferred tax liability related to goodwill. Goodwill is an amortizing asset according to tax regulations. This generates a deferred tax liability that is not used to offset deferred tax assets for valuation allowance considerations.

Net Loss

The factors described above resulted in net loss of $3,335 during the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to a net loss of $24,947 during the year ended December 31, 2015.

Deemed Dividend

As approved by the stockholders on September 30, 2015, we modified the terms of warrants, held by the investors that participated in the June 2015 Debentures in excess of $5 million, which included reducing the exercise price of such warrants to $0.75 and adding down-round price protection provisions. These warrants had previously been classified and recorded in stockholders' equity. As a result of the modification these warrants now meet the definition of a derivative. As a result of the modification, we recorded a deemed dividend related to these warrants of $2,962, which was determined as the difference between the fair value of these warrants immediately before the modification and immediately after. The binomial method was used to value the warrants. 

Non-GAAP adjusted income (loss)

As a result of our acquisition of the XTRAC and VTRAC products, we have determined to supplement our condensed consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with GAAP, presented elsewhere within this report, we will provide certain non-GAAP measures of financial performance. These non-GAAP measures include non-GAAP adjusted income.

We consider these non-GAAP measures in addition to our results prepared under current accounting standards, but they are not a substitute for, nor superior to, GAAP measures. These non-GAAP measures are provided to enhance readers' overall understanding of our current financial performance and to provide further information for comparative purposes.

Specifically, we believe the non-GAAP measures provide useful information to management and investors by isolating certain expenses, gains and losses that may not be indicative of our core operating results and business outlook. In addition, we believe non-GAAP measures enhance the comparability of results against prior periods. Reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measure of all non-GAAP measures included in this report is as follows:

* Includes depreciation on lasers placed-in-service of $4,410 and $2,364 for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2016, we had $4,619 of working capital compared to $4,900 as of December 31, 2015. Cash and cash equivalents were $3,928 as of December 31, 2016, as compared to $3,318, including restricted cash of $15, as of December 31, 2015.

In June 2015, we raised additional gross proceeds of approximately $42,500 through the issuance of $32,500 of 2.25% senior secured convertible debentures due June 2020, $10,000 of Senior secured notes and warrants to purchase common stock. The debentures are convertible at any time into an aggregate of approximately 43.3 million shares of our common stock at a price of $0.75 per share. Our obligations under the debentures are secured by a subordinated first priority lien on all of our assets. During 2016 and 2015, $265 and $222 of debentures were converted into common stock, respectively.

On December 30, 2015, we entered into a $12,000 credit facility pursuant to a Credit and Security Agreement (the "Agreement") and related financing documents with MidCap Financial Trust ("MidCap") and the lenders listed therein. Under the Agreement, the credit facility may be drawn down in two tranches, the first of which was drawn for $10,500 on December 30, 2015. The proceeds of this first tranche were used to repay $10,000 principal amount of short-term senior secured promissory notes, plus associated interest, loan fees and expenses. The second tranche was drawn for $1,500 on January 29, 2016. Our obligations under the credit facility are secured by a first priority lien on all of our assets. Other financing documents included subordination agreements and other amendments with our existing debenture holders from its 2014 and 2015 financings.

Until 2016, we had experienced recurring losses and negative cash flow from operations since inception. Historically, we have been dependent on raising capital from the sale of securities in order to continue to operate and to meet our obligations in the ordinary course of business. We believe that our cash as of December 31, 2016 combined with the anticipated revenues from the sale of our products will be sufficient to satisfy our working capital needs, capital asset purchases, outstanding commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with our existing operating through the next twelve months following the filing of this Form 10-K.

On October 25, 2016, we were notified by NASDAQ that NASDAQ had granted us an extension of the deadline to April 24, 2017 to demonstrate compliance with NASDAQ's continued listing requirements. We will continue to monitor the closing bid price for our common stock and to assess our options for maintaining the listing of its common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market in light of the Notice. Failure to maintain the listing of our common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market would lead to an event of default under the debentures issued in our 2015 financing. Also, if delisting were to occur, selling our common stock could be more difficult because smaller quantities of shares would likely be bought and sold, transactions could be delayed, and security analysts' coverage of us may be reduced. Furthermore, while we believe that our common stock would trade on the OTC Bulletin Board, we would lose various advantages attendant to listing on a national securities exchange, including but not limited to, eligibility to register the sale or resale of our shares on Form S-3 and the automatic exemption from registration under state securities laws for exchange-listed securities, which could have a negative effect on our ability to raise funds. Additionally it would be deemed a default under the 2015 debentures and a breach of our affirmative covenants and therefore an event of default under our financing documents with Midcap. If there is an event of default, the 2015 debentures and the term note could be due immediately and would be classified as a current liability.

As one approach to curing the listing deficiency, we have asked the Shareholders to approve a reverse stock-split of up to 1 for 10 of our common stock. We have scheduled the meeting for March 29, 2017 and we cannot assure you that we will have the necessary quorum to hold a vote on the proposal, or that if we do have a quorum that there will be a majority of shares cast in favor of authorizing the company to effect a reverse split.

Net cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities was $322 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to cash used in operating activities of $6,570 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The primary reasons for the change was the cash from operations generated by the XTRAC and VTRAC business, which was acquired on June 22, 2015, and a continued effort to reduce expenses.

Net cash and cash equivalents used in investing activities was $868 for the year December 31, 2016 compared to cash used in investing activities of $44,239 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The primary reason for the change was the asset purchase of the XTRAC and VTRAC business during year ended December 31, 2015.

Net cash and cash equivalents provided by financing activities was $1,167 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to cash provided by financing activities of $42,670 for the year ended December 31, 2015. In the year ended December 31, 2016, we drew down $1,500 on a long-term debt facility. In the year ended December 31, 2015, we completed a financing consisting of Senior secured notes amounting to $10,000 and senior secured convertible debentures of $32,500; repaid the Senior secured notes of $10,000 and drew down $10,500 on a long-term debt facility.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At December 31, 2016, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Impact of Inflation

We have not operated in a highly inflationary period, and we do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our revenues or expenses.

Item 7A.          Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

Our exposure to market risk is confined to our cash and cash equivalents. We invest in high-quality financial instruments, primarily money market funds, with the average effective duration of the portfolio within one year which we believe are subject to limited credit risk. We currently do not hedge interest rate exposure. Due to the short-term nature of our investments, we do not believe that we have any material exposure to interest rate risk arising from our investments. We are exposed to credit risks in the event of default by the financial institutions or issuers of investments in excess of FDIC insured limits. We perform periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these financial institutions and limit the amount of credit exposure with any institution.

Item 8.          Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

The financial statements required by this Item 8 are included in this Report and begin on page F-1.

Item 9.          Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Item 9A.          Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")), as of December 31, 2016. Based on that evaluation, management has concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level described below.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework established in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, our management has determined that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.

Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, no evaluation of internal control over financial reporting can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud.

The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no change in our internal control over financial reporting in our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B.          Other Information

None.

PART III

 

Item 10.          Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

Our directors currently have terms which will end at our next annual meeting of the stockholders or until their successors are elected and qualify, subject to their prior death, resignation or removal. Officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. There are no family relationships among any of our directors and executive officers. Members of our Board of Directors are encouraged to attend meetings of the Board of Directors and the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Board of Directors held six meetings.

The following sets forth certain biographical information concerning our current directors and our executive officers as of March 9, 2017.

Jeffrey F. O'Donnell, Sr. was appointed to serve on our Board of Directors in January 2014 and appointed as Chairman of the Board of Directors in March 2014. Mr. O'Donnell is currently President and Chief Executive Officer of Trice Medical, an emerging growth medical device company developing optical needles used by orthopedic surgeons to diagnose soft tissue damage of joints. In 2008, Mr. O'Donnell started Embrella Cardiovascular, Inc., a medical device startup company. In July 2009, Mr. O'Donnell was named President and Chief Executive Officer of the company, which was later sold to Edwards Lifesciences Corporation in March 2011. From 1999 through 2009, Mr. O'Donnell served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of PhotoMedex, Inc., a public medical device company listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market. From 1995 through 2000, Mr. O'Donnell was at Cardiovascular Dynamics, Inc., a company focused in interventional cardiology, where he served in a number of senior executive positions, including President and Chief Operating Officer and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Cardiovascular Dynamics became Radiance Medical Systems, which was purchased by Endologix, Inc. in 2000. Mr. O'Donnell remained on the Board of Directors until 2012. Currently, Mr. O'Donnell sits on the Board of Directors of BioSig Technologies. We believe Mr. O'Donnell's qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include his extensive experience in the healthcare industry; his traditional corporate background with emerging growth company experience; and his past experience as a president, chief executive officer or director of several other companies.

Francis J. McCaney became our President and Chief Executive Officer on October 31, 2016. Mr. McCaney was most recently the chief executive officer of Corpak MedSystems, a private equity-backed medical device company in the field of enteral feeding. Corpak was sold to Halyard Health (HYH: NYSE) for $174 million in May 2016. Prior to Corpak, he was the founder and CEO of Nitric BioTherapeutics, a venture backed-medical technology company from 2006 until 2012. Prior to Nitric Bio, he was a senior executive at Viasys Healthcare, Inc. (VAS: NYSE), a medical technology company focusing on respiratory, neurology, medical disposable and orthopedic products and had a lead role in spinning Viasys out of Thermo Electron Corporation (TMO: NYSE). While at Viasys, Mr. McCaney had several responsibilities including strategy, business development and investor relations. He currently serves as a director of Diasome Pharmaceuticals, a privately-held company. We believe Mr. McCaney's qualifications to serves on our Board of Directors include his extensive executive experience in the healthcare industry, including medical device companies.

R. Rox Anderson has served as a member of our Board of Directors since September 30, 2015. Dr, Anderson is a professor at Harvard Medical School, an adjunct professor at MIT, and director of the Wellman Center for Photomedicine at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. Wellman is the world's largest academic facility dedicated to photomedicine. After graduating from MIT, Dr. Anderson received his M.D. degree magna cum laude from a joint MIT-Harvard medical program, Health Sciences and Technology. He conceived and developed non-scarring dermatologic surgery using selectively-absorbed laser pulses, which is now the preferred basis for treatment of birthmarks, pigmented lesions, tattoos, hypertrichosis and other conditions. He has made many contributions to the understanding and development of laser-tissue interactions, tissue optics, photodynamic therapy, and optical diagnostics. Dr. Anderson also practices dermatology, teaches at Harvard and MIT, and conducts research at the Wellman Center for Photomedicine. Active research includes diagnostic tissue imaging and spectroscopy, photodynamic therapy, mechanisms of laser-tissue interactions, adipose tissue biology, low-level light effects and novel therapies for skin disorders. Dr. Anderson received the Presidential Citation, the Ellet H. Drake and William Mark awards from the American Society for Laser Medicine & Surgery, Inc., serves on the editorial board of such society's journal and was its 2009 president. Dr. Anderson currently serves the American Society for Laser Medicine & Surgery, Inc. as director of government communications and education. This is the first year Dr. Anderson has been nominated to the Board of Directors. We believe Dr. Anderson's qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include his extensive experience in the healthcare industry, including his strong dermatological research and analysis background.

Samuel Navarro has served as a member of our Board of Directors since March 2014. Since October 2008, Mr. Navarro has been Managing Partner at Gravitas Healthcare, LLC, which provides strategic advisory services to medical technology companies. From September 2005 to October 2008, Mr. Navarro was Managing Director of Cowen & Co. in New York City and head of their Medical Technology Investment Banking initiatives, leading a team of senior people, and was responsible for building the franchise across all product categories, including M&A/Advisory and financing services and products. From 2001 to 2005, Mr. Navarro was at The Galleon Group running the Galleon Healthcare Fund as a Senior Portfolio Manager. He was responsible for all health care investments across all sectors, including pharmaceutical/biopharmaceutical industries, medical technology and hospital supplies, and all areas of healthcare services. From July 1998 to February 2001, Mr. Navarro was Global Head of Healthcare Investment Banking at ING Barings. Mr. Navarro has also served or serves on the boards of Arstasis, Derma Sciences, MicroTherapeutics, Jomed, Photomedex and Pixelux Entertainment. Mr. Navarro received an MBA in Finance from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, a Master of Science in Engineering from Stanford University and a Bachelor of Science in Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin. We believe Mr. Navarro's qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include his wealth of knowledge and industry expertise in finance, investment banking, mergers and acquisitions, equity research and investment management experience in the medical device industry.

David K. Stone has served as a member of our Board of Directors since December 2011 and served as Chairman of our Board of Directors from June 2013 to November 2013. In 2006, Mr. Stone founded Liberty Tree Advisors, LLC, a life sciences investment banking and consulting firm where he served as a Managing Director until January 2017. Prior to this, from 2000 to 2006 Mr. Stone was a Managing Director and Partner at Flagship Ventures, a venture capital fund focused in the life sciences industry. From 1989 to 1999, Mr. Stone led the biotechnology equity research team at Cowen & Company. Mr. Stone is currently on the Board of Directors of PAKA Pulmonary Pharmaceuticals. He has also served on the Board of Directors of Seahorse Bioscience, where he was Chairman of the Audit Committee from 2001 to November 2015 when Seahorse Bioscience was acquired by Agilent. He served on the Board of Directors of Oscient Pharmaceuticals, where he served as Chairman from 2005 to 2009. In March 2017, Mr. Stone was sanctioned by FINRA, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, for failure to supervise a broker in a private securities transaction. The sanction consists of a two-month suspension from associating with any FINRA member firm in a principal capacity and a minimal fine. We believe Mr. Stone's qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include his extensive experience as a biopharmaceutical industry research analyst and his venture capital work with numerous pharmaceutical and medical device companies.

Kathryn Swintek was elected to our Board of Directors, in April 2013. Since August 2010, Ms. Swintek has been a Managing Partner and member of the Investment Committee of Golden Seeds Fund 2, and Managing Director of Golden Seeds LLC, an angel investment forum backing women owned or managed early stage and growth companies. Prior to Golden Seeds, Ms. Swintek was a senior executive at BNP Paribas from November 1989 to April 2008, where she most recently served as Managing Director and Global Co-Head of its London-based Financial Sponsors Coverage Group. From 1974 to 1989, Ms. Swintek was a senior executive with Irving Trust Company (now known as BNY Mellon), where she was a Sr. Vice President and held positions in risk management, and acquisition finance, and managed business relationships for the International Division in North Africa and the Near East, as well as in France, where she served as Representative while residing in Paris. Ms. Swintek is a former Chair of the Governing Board and the Executive Committee of C200, a business women's leadership organization, which she joined in 2003. She serves on the Board of Directors of Bergen Medical Products, Inc., Turtle & Hughes, Inc., Open Road Integrated Media, Inc., and Oculogica Inc.In addition to C200, she is a member of the Women's Forum of New York, Women Corporate Directors, and Women Business Leaders of the U.S. Health Care Industry Foundation. Ms. Swintek serves as the Chairperson of our Audit Committee and is a member of our Executive Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee. We believe that Ms. Swintek's qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include her corporate leadership experience and her wide-ranging experience in international financial services.

LuAnn Via has served as a member of our Board of Directors since April 2012. From November 2012 through January 2017, Ms. Via was President and CEO of Christopher & Banks Corporation, a specialty retailer of women's clothes; a company operating more than 500 retail stores. Prior to this, Ms. Via served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Payless ShoeSource, a unit of Collective Brands, Inc., from July 2008 to October 2012 when the company was acquired and taken private. Before joining Payless ShoeSource, from January 2006 Ms. Via served as group divisional President of Lane Bryant and Cacique store chains and as President of Catherines stores, both divisions of Charming Shoppes, Inc. Prior to this, and for more than 20 years, Ms. Via held several leadership positions with a number of top retailers. Ms. Via is a member of Women Corporate Directors and The Committee of 200, a business women's leadership group. We believe Ms. Via's qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include her experience in retail sales and manufacturing and her extensive experience as a CEO and senior executive of several publicly-listed companies.

With respect to the incumbent members of the Board of Directors, none of the members has, in the past 10 years, been subject to a federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to any legal proceedings, which include judicial or administrative proceedings resulting from involvement in mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity or based on violations of federal or state securities, commodities, banking, or insurance laws and regulations, or any settlement to such actions, and any disciplinary sanction or order imposed by a stock, commodities or derivatives exchange other self-regulatory organization.

Board Leadership Structure

Our Board of Directors administers its risk oversight function as a whole by making risk oversight a matter of collective consideration. While management is responsible for identifying risks, our Board of Directors has charged the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors with evaluating financial and accounting risk, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors with evaluating risks associated with employees and compensation. Investor-related risks are usually addressed by the Board as a whole.

Compensation, Nominations and Corporate Governance and Audit Committees

General.    Our Board of Directors maintains charters for select committees. In addition, our Board of Directors has adopted a written set of corporate governance guidelines and a code of business conduct and ethics and a code of conduct for our chief executive and senior financial officers that generally formalize practices that we already had in place. We have adopted a Code of Ethics on Interactions with Health Care Professionals, an Anti-Fraud Program and a policy for compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. To view the charters of our Audit, Compensation and Nominations and Corporate Governance Committees, Code of Ethics, corporate governance guidelines, codes of conduct and whistle blower policy, please visit our website at www.strataskinsciences.com, under the Corporate Governance section of the Investor Relations page (this website address is not intended to function as a hyperlink and the information contained on our website is not intended to be a part of this Report). In compliance with Nasdaq rules, the majority of our Board of Directors is comprised of independent directors. The Board of Directors determined in 2016 that, except for Mr. McCaney, who is our Chief Executive Officer, as well as Mr. O'Donnell and Mr. Navarro, who receive consulting fees, all other current members of the Board of Directors are independent under the revised listing standards of NASDAQ.

Compensation Committee.    Our Compensation Committee discharges the Board of Directors' responsibilities relating to compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers, produces an annual report on executive compensation for inclusion in our annual proxy statement and this Report and provides general oversight of compensation structure. Other specific duties and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee include:

Our Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee is currently composed of LuAnn Via, Kathryn Swintek and David K. Stone. Ms. Via serves as the Chairman of the Compensation Committee. Our Board of Directors determined that each member of the Compensation Committee as of December 31, 2016 satisfies the independence requirements of Nasdaq. The Compensation Committee held seven formal meetings during 2016.

The Compensation Committee reviews executive compensation from time to time and reports to the Board of Directors, which makes all final decisions with respect to executive compensation. The Compensation Committee adheres to several guidelines in carrying out its responsibilities, including performance by the employees, our performance, enhancement of stockholder value, growth of new businesses and new markets and competitive levels of fixed and variable compensation. The report of the Compensation Committee for 2016 is presented below.

Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee.    Our Board of Directors has established a Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee for the purpose of reviewing all Board of Director-recommended and stockholder-recommended nominees, determining each nominee's qualifications and making a recommendation to the full Board of Directors as to which persons should be our Board of Directors' nominees. Our Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee is composed of Mrs. Via, Mrs. Swintek and Mr. Stone. Mr. Stone serves as the Chairman of the Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee held two meetings during 2016 in conjunction with meetings of the full Board of Directors.

The duties and responsibilities of the Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee include:

The Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee considers these requirements when recommending nominees to our Board of Directors. Our Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee utilizes a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for our directors. Our Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee will regularly assess the appropriate size of our Board of Directors and whether any vacancies on the Board of Directors are expected due to retirement or other circumstances. When considering potential director nominees, the Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee also considers the candidate's character, judgment, diversity, age, skills, including financial literacy and experience in the context of the needs of STRATA Skin and of our existing directors. The Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee also seeks director nominees who are from diverse backgrounds and who possess a range of experiences as well as a reputation for integrity. The Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee considers all of these factors to ensure that our Board of Directors as a whole possesses a broad range of skills, knowledge and experience useful to the effective oversight and leadership of us.

Audit Committee.    Our Board of Directors has established an Audit Committee to assist it in fulfilling its responsibilities for general oversight of the integrity of our consolidated financial statements, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the independent auditors' qualifications and independence, the performance of our independent auditors and an internal audit function and risk assessment and risk management. The duties of our Audit Committee include:

The Audit Committee works closely with management as well as our independent auditors. The Audit Committee has the authority to obtain advice and assistance from, and receive appropriate funding from us for, outside legal, accounting or other advisors as the Audit Committee deems necessary to carry out its duties.

Our Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee that meets the applicable standards of the Commission and Nasdaq. The members of the Audit Committee are Kathryn Swintek, David K. Stone and R. Rox Anderson. Ms. Swintek serves as the Chairman of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee meets regularly and held four meetings during 2016.

The Board of Directors determined in 2016 that each member of the Audit Committee satisfies the independence and other composition requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") and Nasdaq. Our Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert" under Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K and has the requisite accounting or related financial expertise required by applicable Nasdaq rules.

Special Finance Committee

In connection with the purchase of the XTRAC Excimer Laser and the VTRAC excimer lamp businesses from PhotoMedex, Inc. and the related 2015 Financing, we established a special finance committee (the "Finance Committee") for the purpose of evaluating transaction options for we and the potential financing for any such transaction, as well as assisting management in negotiating the acquisition of the XTRAC Excimer Laser and the VTRAC excimer lamp from PhotoMedex, Inc. and assisting management in negotiating the 2015 Financing itself. Jeffrey F. O'Donnell, Sr. and Samuel E. Navarro served on Special Finance Committee with the Board of Directors.

Stockholder Communications with the Board of Directors

Our Board of Directors has established a process for stockholders to communicate with the Board of Directors or with individual directors. Stockholders who wish to communicate with our Board of Directors or with individual directors should direct written correspondence to Jay Sturm, Corporate Counsel at jsturm@strataskin.com or to the following address (our principal executive offices): Board of Directors, c/o Corporate Secretary, 100 Lakeside Drive, Horsham, Pennsylvania 19044. Any such communication must contain:

Mr. Sturm, as the Corporate Secretary will forward such communications to our Board of Directors or the specified individual director to whom the communication is directed unless such communication is unduly hostile, threatening, illegal or similarly inappropriate, in which case the Corporate Secretary has the authority to discard the communication or to take appropriate legal action regarding such communication.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS*

The audit committee oversees the Company's financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the audit committee reviewed the audited financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 with management, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.

The audit committee is responsible for reviewing, approving and managing the engagement of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, including the scope, extent and procedures of the annual audit and compensation to be paid therefore, and all other matters the audit committee deems appropriate, including the Company's independent registered public accounting firm's accountability to the Board of Directors and the audit committee. The audit committee reviewed with the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, which is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles, its judgment as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company's accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the audit committee by the Standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB"), including PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 16, Communications With Audit Committees, the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and other applicable regulations, and discussed and reviewed the results of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm's examination of the financial statements. In addition, the audit committee discussed with the Company's independent registered public accounting firm the independent registered public accounting firm's independence from management and the Company, including the matters in the written disclosures and the letter regarding its independence by Rule 3526 of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm's communications with the audit committee concerning independence. The audit committee also considered whether the provision of non-audit services was compatible with maintaining the independent registered public accounting firm's independence.

The audit committee discussed with the Company's independent registered public accounting firm the overall scope and plans for its audits, and received from them written disclosures and letter regarding their independence. The audit committee meets with the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results of its examinations, its evaluations of the Company's internal control over financial reporting and the overall quality of the Company's financial reporting. The audit committee held four meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the audit committee recommended to the Board of Directors (and the Board of Directors has approved) that the audited financial statements be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 for filing with the Commission. The audit committee has also retained EisnerAmper LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.

AUDIT COMMITTEE:

Kathryn Swintek

R. Rox Anderson

David K. Stone

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers and beneficial holders of more than 10% of our common stock to file with the Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our equity securities. As of March 15, 2017, we believe, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and representations of these persons that all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to directors and officers were timely met during the year ended December 31, 2016.

Item 11.          Executive Compensation

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table includes information for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 concerning compensation for our Named Executive Officers.

Overview of Executive Employment Agreements and Payments upon Termination or Change of Control

Employment Agreement with Francis J. McCaney.    On October 31, 2016, we entered into an Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") with Francis J. McCaney, our President and Chief Executive Officer. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. McCaney will receive a base salary of $375,000 and will be eligible to receive a bonus of up to 50% of his base salary per annum, starting for fiscal year 2017, based on achievement of specified milestones, as determined by our Board based upon annual budgets approved by our Board from time to time, provided that the cash bonus for 2016 shall be prorated based upon the portion of such fiscal year during which Mr. McCaney was employed pursuant to the agreement.

In addition, Mr. McCaney was granted options to purchase up to 1,550,000 shares of our common stock, having a term of ten years, as follows: (i) 542,500 shares vesting in three substantially equal installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of October 31, 2016; and (ii) up to 1,007,500 shares vesting in three substantially equal annual installments upon a determination by our Board that we have achieved the following milestones for each of the 2017, 2018 and 2019 fiscal years, respectively: (A) one-third if we achieve the revenue plan established by our Board for such year, (B) one-third if we achieve the EBITDA plan established by our Board for such year, and (C) one-third if we achieve the goals established by our Board for such year; provided that any such stock option that has not vested with respect to any particular year due to the failure to satisfy a milestone condition for that year will terminate as of the end of that year and will no longer become exercisable. If (i) we undergo a change of control before the stock option vests in full and (ii) Mr. McCaney is not offered post-change of control employment by us or any successor entity, or if offered such post-change of control employment and Mr. McCaney terminates his employment for good reason (as those terms are defined in the employment agreement) within a period of 30 days after the date of the change of control, conditioned upon his execution of a release satisfactory to us, all such stock options that have not previously terminated shall accelerate and shall vest in full upon the effective date of the termination of Employee's employment.

In the event of a change of control, as defined in the agreement, and (a) Mr. McCaney has not been offered post-change of control employment by us or any successor entity or (b) Mr. McCaney is offered such post-change of control employment, and he terminates his employment for good reason, as defined in the agreement, within 30 days after the date of change of control, in addition to payment of his base salary and any cash bonus earned through the date of termination, Mr. McCaney will be entitled to receive, conditioned upon his execution of a release satisfactory to us, severance in the amount of his then current base salary for 18 months. In the event we terminate Mr. McCaney's employment other than for cause or upon a change of control or by reason of his death or disability or his voluntary decision to terminate, in addition to payment of his base salary and any cash bonus earned through the date of termination, Mr. McCaney will be entitled to receive, conditioned upon his execution of a release satisfactory to us, severance in the amount of his then current base salary for 12 months.

Employment Agreement with Christina L. Allgeier.    On November 11, 2015 we entered into an employment agreement with Christina L. Allgeier, our Chief Financial Officer. The agreement has a one-year initial term, subject to annual extensions thereafter. Under the terms of the agreement, Ms. Allgeier receives a base salary of $200,000 and is eligible to receive a bonus of up to 30% of her base salary per annum, based on achievement of specified milestones, as determined by the Board of Directors following approval of the annual budget, and other objectives to be determined. In the event Ms. Allgeier's employment is terminated, without cause or in conjunction with a change of control, she will be entitled to severance equal to 12 months of her base salary. The agreement also contains a 12 month non-compete and non-solicitation period.

Outstanding Equity Awards Value at Fiscal Year-End Table

The following table includes certain information with respect to the value of all unexercised options and unvested shares of restricted stock previously awarded to the executive officers named above at the fiscal year end, December 31, 2016.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END TABLE

 

 

Director Compensation

On November 4, 2015, we entered into consulting agreements with two of our directors, Jeffrey F. O'Donnell, Sr. and Samuel E. Navarro, the terms of which are the same. Under the terms of their respective agreements, each director agrees provide strategic support, advice and guidance to us and our management team in connection with the integration and operation of our expanded business, investor relations and internal and external business development activities. The consultant will make himself available to our President and Chief Executive Officer and our management team on request at mutually convenient times and will report to our Board of Directors quarterly and otherwise when requested by the Board. The term of the agreement was extended through June 30, 2017. The directors were each paid an up-front fee of $40,000 for advice and services rendered prior to the date of the agreement, a retainer of $10,000 per month, commencing November 10, 2016 and continuing on the tenth day of each month through the expiration of the agreement, and reimbursement of pre-approved, out-of-pocket expenses.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

Limitation on Directors' Liabilities; Indemnification of Officers and Directors

Our Fifth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended ("Certificate of Incorporation") and bylaws designate the relative duties and responsibilities of our officers, establish procedures for actions by directors and stockholders and other items. Our Certificate of Incorporation and bylaws also contain extensive indemnification provisions, which will permit us to indemnify our officers and directors to the maximum extent provided by Delaware law. Pursuant to our Certificate of Incorporation and under Delaware law, our directors are not liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty, except for (i) any breach of the director's duty of loyalty; (ii) acts for omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law; breach of duty with respect to dividends and other distributions; or (iv) any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.

Directors' and Officers' Liability Insurance

We have obtained directors' and officers' liability insurance, which expires on November 16, 2017. We are required under our indemnification agreements to maintain such insurance for us and members of our Board of Directors.

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information set forth in Item 5 of this Annual Report under the heading "Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans" is hereby incorporated by reference.

The following table reflects, as of March 9, 2017, the beneficial common stock ownership of: (a) each of our directors, (b) each executive officer, (c) each person known by us to be a beneficial holder of five percent (5%) or more of our common stock, and (d) all of our executive officers and directors as a group. Unless otherwise provided in the accompanying footnotes, the information used in the table below was obtained from the referenced beneficial owner.

Name and Address Of Beneficial Owner (1)		Number of Shares Beneficially Owned		Percentage of Shares Beneficially Owned (1)
Francis J. McCaney (2)		20,000		*
Christina L. Allgeier (3)		12,500		*
Jeffrey F. O'Donnell, Sr. (4)		654,271		5.67%
Samuel E. Navarro (5)		651,379		5.65%
David K. Stone (6)		160,028		1.45%
Kathryn Swintek (7)		159,128		1.44%
LuAnn Via (8)		157,825		1.43%
R. Rox Anderson (9)		112,500		1.02%
All directors and officers as a group (eight persons) (10)		1,927,631		15.08%
Broadfin Healthcare Master Fund, Ltd (11)		1,008,297		9.99%
Sabby Healthcare Master Fund, Ltd (12)		998,019		9.99%
Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund, Ltd (13)		116,571		9.99%

*          Less than 1%.

(1)

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Commission. Shares of common stock subject to delivery, or subject to options or warrants currently exercisable or exercisable, within 60 days of March 15, 2017, are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of the stockholder holding the options or warrants, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of any other stockholder. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table, we believe stockholders named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to the shares set forth opposite such stockholder's name. Unless otherwise indicated, the listed officers, directors and stockholders can be reached at our principal offices. Percentage of ownership is based on 10,884,490 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 9, 2017.

(2)	Includes 20,000 shares of common stock. Does not include options to purchase up to 1,550,000 shares of common stock, which may vest more than 60 days after March 9, 2017.

(3)	Includes vested options to purchase 12,500 shares of common stock. Does not include options to purchase up to 87,500 shares of common stock, which may vest more than 60 days after March 9, 2017.

(4)

Includes 1,352 shares of common stock and vested options to purchase 652,919 shares of common stock. Does not include unvested options to purchase up to 75,000 shares of common stock, which may vest more than 60 days after March 9, 2017. Mr. O'Donnell's address is 100 Lakeside Drive, Suite 100, Horsham, PA 19044.

(5)	Includes vested options to purchase 651,379 shares of common stock. Does not include unvested options to purchase up to 75,000 shares of common stock, which may vest more than 60 days after March 9, 2017. Mr. Navarro's address is 100 Lakeside Drive, Suite 100, Horsham, PA 19044.

(6)

Includes 1,352 shares of common stock and vested options to purchase 158,676 shares of common stock. Does not include unvested options to purchase up to 75,000 shares of common stock, which may vest more than 60 days after March 9, 2017. Mr. Stone's address is 100 Lakeside Drive, Suite 100, Horsham, PA 19044.

(7)

Includes 3,352 shares of common stock and vested options to purchase 155,776 shares of common stock. Does not include unvested options to purchase up to 75,000 shares of common stock, which may vest more than 60 days after March 9, 2017. Ms. Swintek's address is 100 Lakeside Drive, Suite 100, Horsham, PA 19044.

(8)

Includes 2,852 shares of common stock and vested options to purchase 154,973 shares of common stock. Does not include unvested options to purchase up to 75,000 shares of common stock, which may vest more than 60 days after March 9, 2017. Ms. Via's address is 100 Lakeside Drive, Suite 100, Horsham, PA 19044.

(9)	Includes vested options to purchase 112,500 shares of common stock. Does not include unvested options to purchase up to 75,000 shares of common stock, which may vest more than 60 days after March 9, 2017. Mr. Anderson's address is 100 Lakeside Drive, Suite 100, Horsham, PA 19044.

(10)	Includes 28,908 shares of common stock and vested options to purchase 1,898,723 shares of common stock. Does not include unvested options to purchase up to 2,037,500 shares of common stock, which may vest more than 60 days after March 9, 2017.

(11)

The business address of Broadfin Healthcare Master Fund, LTD ("Broadfin") is 20 Genesis Close Ansbacher House, Second Floor, P.O. Box 1344, Grand Cayman KY1-1108, Cayman Islands and the business address of each of Broadfin Capital, LLC and Kevin Kotler is 300 Park Avenue, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10022. Broadfin, Broadfin Capital, LLC and Kevin Kotler have shared voting and investment control of the securities held by Broadfin. Broadfin holds the following securities: (i) 1,008,297 shares of common stock; (ii) warrants to purchase 3,200,282 shares of common stock at $0.75 per share; (iii) 377,177 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of $967,459 principal amount of 4% convertible debentures issued in July 2014 and (iv) 20,000,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of $15,000,000 principal amount of 2.25% convertible debentures issued in June 2015. The conversion of all debentures and the exercise of all warrants referenced in this footnote are subject to a 9.99% blocker. The foregoing information has been derived in part from a Schedule 13D filed by Broadfin Capital, LLC on March 15, 2016 and a Form 4 filed by Broadfin Capital LLC on March 14, 2016.

(12)

The business address of Sabby Healthcare Master Fund Ltd. ("Sabby HMF") is c/o Sabby Management LLC, 10 Mountainview Road, Suite 205, Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. Sabby Management, LLC serves as the investment manager of Sabby HMF. Hal Mintz is the manager of Sabby Management, LLC and has voting and investment control of the securities held by Sabby HMF. Each of Sabby Management, LLC and Hal Mintz disclaims beneficial ownership over the securities beneficially owned by Sabby HMF except to the extent of their respective pecuniary interest therein. Sabby HMF holds the following securities: (i) 998,019 shares of common stock; (ii) warrants to purchase 4,846,536 shares of common stock at $0.75 per share; (iii) 2,339,182 upon conversion of $6,000,000 of Series B convertible preferred stock; (iv) 2,183,603 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of $5,600,941 principal amount of 4% convertible debentures issued in July 2014 and (v) 16,000,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of $12,000,000 principal amount of 2.25% convertible debentures issued in June 2015. The conversion of all debentures and the exercise of all warrants referenced in this footnote are subject to a 9.99% blocker. The foregoing information has been derived in part from a Schedule 13G filed by Sabby HMF on January 6, 2017.

(13)

The business address of Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund Ltd. ("Sabby VWMF") is c/o Sabby Management LLC, 10 Mountainview Road, Suite 205, Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. Sabby Management, LLC serves as the investment manager of Sabby VWMF. Hal Mintz is the manager of Sabby Management, LLC and has voting and investment control of the securities held by Sabby VWMF. Each of Sabby Management, LLC and Hal Mintz disclaims beneficial ownership over the securities beneficially owned by Sabby VWMF except to the extent of their respective pecuniary interest therein. Sabby VWMF holds the following securities: (i) 116,571 shares of common stock; (ii) warrants to purchase 1,257,124 shares of common stock at $0.75 per share; (iii) 837,048 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of $2,147,028 principal amount of 4% convertible debentures issued in July 2014 and (iv) 6,416,667 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of $4,812,500 principal amount of 2.25% convertible debentures issued in June 2015. The conversion of all debentures and the exercise of all warrants referenced in this footnote are subject to a 9.99% blocker. The foregoing information has been derived in part from a Schedule 13G filed by Sabby VWMF on January 6, 2017.

Item 13.          Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, Director Independence

On June 22, 2015, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with the Purchasers, including certain funds managed by Sabby Management, LLC and Broadfin Capital LLC, in connection with a private placement. We sold $10.0 million aggregate principal amount of Notes bearing interest at 9% per year, with a maturity date of the earlier of 30 days after we obtain stockholder approval of stock issuances under the Debentures and the Warrants or November 30, 2015. The Purchasers of the Notes were issued Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 3.0 million shares of common stock, having an exercise price of $0.75 per share. We also issued $32.5 million aggregate principal amount of Debentures that, subject to certain ownership limitations and stockholder approval conditions, will be convertible into 43,333,334 shares of common stock at an initial conversion price of $0.75 per share. The Debentures bear interest at the rate of 2.25% per year, and, unless previously converted, will mature on the five-year anniversary of the date of issuance. Our obligations under the Debt Securities are secured by a first priority lien on all of our assets, except for a second lien on our intellectual property. As a condition of the new term note facility, the Debentures from both the 2014 and 2015 financings were amended. The Debentures holders' first priority lien was subordinated to the new term note facility. Additionally, as a condition of the term note facility, the maturity date of both Debentures was extended to June 30, 2021. Effective upon the date the Stockholder Approval, on September 30, 2015, we repriced outstanding Warrants held by certain investors to reduce the exercise price to $0.75 per share.

In connection with this financing, we also granted to the Purchasers resale registration rights with respect to the shares of common stock underlying the Debentures and the Warrants pursuant to the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement. In addition to the registration rights, the Selling Stockholders are entitled to receive liquidated damages upon the occurrence of a number of events relating to filing, becoming effective and maintaining an effective registration statement covering the shares underlying the Debentures and the Warrants. The liquidated damages will be payable upon the occurrence of each of those events and each monthly anniversary thereof until cured. The amount of liquidated damages payable is equal to 2.0% of the aggregate purchase price paid by each Purchaser, provided, however, the maximum aggregate liquidated damages payable to a Purchaser shall be 12% of the aggregate subscription amount paid by such Purchaser pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. The liquidated damages shall accrue interest at a rate of 12% per annum (or such lesser maximum amount that is permitted to be paid by applicable law), accruing on a daily basis for each event until such event is cured.

The Registration Rights Agreement requires us to file one or more registration statements for all of the securities that may be issued upon conversion of the Debentures and exercise of the Warrants issued to the Purchasers. Pursuant to the applicable transaction documents, however, certain Purchasers may not exercise their conversion/exercise rights for that number of shares of common stock which, together with all other shares owned by that Purchaser and its affiliates would result in more than 9.99% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock calculated on the basis of the then outstanding shares.

As required under the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC, or NASDAQ, listing standards, a majority of the members of a listed company's board of directors must qualify as "independent," as affirmatively determined by the board of directors. Our board of directors consults with internal counsel to ensure that the board's determinations are consistent with relevant securities and other laws and regulations regarding the definition of "independent," including those set forth in pertinent NASDAQ listing standards, as in effect from time to time. Consistent with these considerations, after review of all relevant transactions or relationships between each director, or any of his or her family members, and our company, our senior management and our independent registered public accounting firm, the board of directors has affirmatively determined that in 2016 that, except for Mr. McCaney, who is our Chief Executive Officer, as well as Mr. O'Donnell and Mr. Navarro, who receive consulting fees all other current members of the Board of Directors are independent under the revised listing standards of NASDAQ.

On November 4, 2015, we entered into consulting agreements with two of our directors, Jeffrey F. O'Donnell, Sr. and Samuel E. Navarro, the terms of which are the same. Under the terms of their respective agreements, each director agrees provide strategic support, advice and guidance to us and our management team in connection with the integration and operation of our expanded business, investor relations and internal and external business development activities. The consultant will make himself available to our President and Chief Executive Officer and our management team on request at mutually convenient times and will report to our Board of Directors quarterly and otherwise when requested by the Board. The initial term of the agreement was from November 4, 2015 through June 30, 2016. The term of the agreement was extended through June 30, 2017. The directors were each paid an up-front fee of $40,000 for advice and services rendered prior to the date of the agreement, a retainer of $10,000 per month, commencing November 10, 2015 and continuing on the tenth day of each month through the expiration of the agreement, and reimbursement of pre-approved, out-of-pocket expenses.

Item 14.          Principal Accounting Fees and Services

We engaged EisnerAmper LLP as our independent auditors for 2016 and 2015.

The following table shows the fees paid or accrued by us for the audit and other services provided by EisnerAmper for 2016 and 2015:

(1)	Consists of fees billed for the audit of our annual financial statements, review of financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and services that are normally provided by the auditors in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

(2)	Consists of assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit and reviews of our financial statements and are not included in "audit fees" in this table, principally related to the registration statements for equity and debt financings in 2015.

(3)	Consists of all tax related services.

(4)	There were no other fees billed by EisnerAmper LLP for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Engagement of the Independent Auditor. The Audit Committee is responsible for approving every engagement of EisnerAmper LLP to perform audit or non-audit services for us before EisnerAmper LLP is engaged to provide those services. Under applicable Commission rules, the Audit Committee is required to pre-approve the audit and non-audit services performed by the independent auditors in order to ensure that they do not impair the auditors' independence. The Commission's rules specify the types of non-audit services that an independent auditor may not provide to its audit client and establish the Audit Committee's responsibility for administration of the engagement of the independent auditors.

Consistent with the Commission's rules, the Audit Committee Charter requires that the Audit Committee review and pre-approve all audit services and permitted non-audit services provided by the independent auditors to us or any of our subsidiaries. The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to a member of the Audit Committee and if it does, the decisions of that member must be presented to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

The Audit Committee's pre-approval policy provides as follows:

·          First, once a year when the base audit engagement is reviewed and approved, management will identify all other services (including fee ranges) for which management knows it will engage EisnerAmper LLP for the next 12 months. Those services typically include quarterly reviews, specified tax matters, certifications to the lenders as required by financing documents, consultation on new accounting and disclosure standards and, in future years, reporting on management's internal controls assessment.

·          Second, if any new "unlisted" proposed engagement arises during the year, the engagement will require approval of the Audit Committee.

All fees to our independent accounting firms were approved by the Audit Committee.

Auditor Selection for Fiscal 2017 The Audit Committee has selected EisnerAmper LLP to serve as our independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2017. The Committee's selection will be submitted to our stockholders for ratification at our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

 

PART IV

Item 15.          Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 

(a)(1)

Financial Statements

Consolidated balance sheets of STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, changes in' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2016.

(a)(2)           Financial Statement Schedules

All schedules have been omitted because they are not required, not applicable, or the information is otherwise set forth in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

(a)(3)           Exhibits

The exhibits listed under subsections (b) of this Item 15 are hereby incorporated by reference.

(b)          Exhibits

 

We are a reporting company and file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and other information with the Commission. You may inspect and copy these materials at the Public Reference Room maintained by the Commission at Room 100 F Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the Commission at 1‑800‑SEC‑0330 for more information on the Public Reference Room. You can also find our Commission filings at the Commission's website at www.sec.gov. You may also inspect reports and other information concerning us at the offices of the Nasdaq Stock Market at 1735 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006. We intend to furnish our stockholders with annual reports containing audited financial statements and such other periodic reports as we may determine to be appropriate or as may be required by law.

Our primary Internet address is www.strataskinsciences.com (this website address is not intended to function as a hyperlink and the information contained on our website is not intended to be a part of this Report). Corporate information can be located by clicking on the "Investor Relations" link in the top-middle of the page, and then clicking on "SEC Filing" in the menu. We make our periodic Commission Reports (Forms 10-Q and Forms 10-K) and current reports (Form 8-K) available free of charge through our Web site as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed electronically with the Commission. We may from time to time provide important disclosures to investors by posting them in the Investor Relations section of our Web site, as allowed by Commission's rules. The information on the website listed above is not and should not be considered part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is intended to be an inactive textual reference only.

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)