STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. - Annual Report: 2021 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021
OR
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number: 0-11635
STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
13-3986004
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
incorporation or Organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
5 Walnut Grove Drive, Suite 140 Horsham, Pennsylvania
|
|
19044
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code)
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (215)
619-3200
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
|
|
Trading Symbol(s)
|
|
Name Of Each Exchange On Which Registered
|
Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value
|
|
SSKN
|
|
The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically; every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation
S-T (§232.0405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes
☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging
growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ☐
|
Accelerated filer ☐
|
Non-accelerated filer ☒
|
Smaller reporting company ☒
|
|
|
|
Emerging growth company ☐
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised
financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over
financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The number of shares outstanding of our common stock as of June 30, 2021 was 33,889,239 shares. The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity held
by non-affiliates on the registrant was $25,923,351, computed by reference to the closing market price of $1.56 of the common stock
as of June 30, 2021 and 16,617,533 shares held by non-affiliates. As of March 18, 2022, the number of shares outstanding of our common stock was 34,723,046.
|
Page
|
|
4
|
||
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
4
|
|
Item 1A.
|
15
|
|
Item 1B.
|
37
|
|
Item 2.
|
37
|
|
Item 3.
|
37
|
|
Item 4.
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
||
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
38
|
|
Item 6.
|
39
|
|
Item 7.
|
39
|
|
Item 7A.
|
53
|
|
Item 8.
|
54
|
|
Item 9.
|
54
|
|
Item 9A.
|
54
|
|
Item 9B.
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
||
|
|
|
Item 10.
|
55
|
|
Item 11.
|
55
|
|
Item 12.
|
55
|
|
Item 13.
|
55
|
|
Item 14.
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
||
|
|
|
Item 15.
|
56 | |
Item 16.
|
61 |
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Report, including the sections entitled “Risk Factors”, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Business”, includes forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements relate to, among others, our plans,
objectives and expectations for our business, operations and financial performance and condition, and can be identified by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “will,”
“could,” “project,” “target,” “potential,” “continue” and similar expressions that do not relate solely to historical matters. Forward-looking statements are based on management’s belief and assumptions and on information currently available to
management. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in forward-looking statements are reasonable, such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or
achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:
● |
forecasts of future business performance, consumer trends and macro-economic conditions;
|
● |
descriptions of market, competitive conditions, and competitive product introductions;
|
● |
descriptions of plans or objectives of management for future operations, products or services;
|
● |
actions by the FDA or other regulatory agencies with respect to our products or product candidates;
|
● |
changes to third-party reimbursement of laser treatments using our devices;
|
● |
our estimates regarding the sufficiency of our cash resources, expenses, capital requirements and needs for additional financing and our ability to obtain additional financing;
|
● |
our ability to protect our intellectual property and operate our business without infringing upon the intellectual property rights of others;
|
● |
anticipated results of existing or future litigation;
|
● |
health emergencies, the spread of infectious disease or pandemics; and
|
● |
descriptions or assumptions underlying or related to any of the above items.
|
In light of these assumptions, risks and uncertainties, the results and events discussed in the forward-looking statements contained in this Report might not occur. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance
on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Report, even if subsequently made available by us on our website or otherwise. We are not under any obligation, and we expressly disclaim any obligation, to update or alter
any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You should not regard these statements as a representation or warranty by us or any other person that we will achieve our objectives and plans in
any specified time frame, or at all. All subsequent forward-looking statements attributable to us or to any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section.
You should read this Annual Report and the documents that we reference in this Annual Report as exhibits with the understanding that our actual future results, performance, and events and circumstances may be
materially different from what we expect.
PART I
Our Company
Overview
We are a medical technology company in dermatology dedicated to developing, commercializing and marketing innovative products for the treatment of dermatologic conditions. Our products include the XTRAC® and now
Pharos® excimer lasers and VTRAC® lamp systems utilized in the treatment of psoriasis, vitiligo and various other skin conditions. We have recently acquired the TheraClear ® acne treatment device to broaden our opportunity with expansion potential
into the acne care market.
Corporate Overview
We were incorporated in the State of New York in 1989 under the name Electro-Optical Sciences, Inc. and subsequently reincorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in 1997. In April 2010, we changed our name to
MELA Sciences, Inc. On January 5, 2016, we changed our name to STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. In June 2015, we completed the acquisition of the XTRAC® Excimer Laser and the VTRAC® excimer lamp businesses from PhotoMedex, Inc. (the “Acquisition”). Prior
to the Acquisition, the Company’s only product was the MelaFind® system, or MelaFind, a device for aiding dermatologists in the evaluation of clinically atypical pigmented skin lesions. We have discontinued the MelaFind business.
In August 2021 and January 2022, we acquired certain assets and certain liabilities related to the Pharos U.S. dermatology business of Ra Medical Systems, Inc. and devices related to the TheraClear business of
Theravant Corporation, respectively.
Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic
In late 2019, there was an outbreak of a new strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) which became a global pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted the global economy, disrupted global supply chains,
constrained work force participation and created significant volatility and disruption of financial markets. In addition, the pandemic led to the suspension of elective procedures in the U.S. and to the temporary closure of many physician practices
which are our primary customers. While most offices reopened, some physician practices closed and never reopened, and the impact of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and its variants on our operational and financial performance, including our ability
to execute our business strategies and initiatives in the expected time frames, will depend on future developments, including the duration and ongoing spread of the COVID-19 outbreak and its variants, continued or renewed restrictions on business
operations and transport, any governmental and societal responses thereto, including legislative or regulatory as well as the percentage of the populace vaccinated and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and the continued impact on worldwide
economic and geopolitical conditions, all of which are uncertain and cannot be predicted. Domestically, as the procedures in which our devices are used are elective in nature; and as social distancing, travel restrictions, quarantines and other
restrictions became prevalent in the United States, this had a negative impact on our recurring revenue model and our financial position and cash flow. The virus has disrupted the supply chains world-wide that we depend upon to provide a steady
source of components to manufacture and repair our devices.
To mitigate the impact of COVID-19, we have taken a variety of measures to ensure the availability and functioning of our critical infrastructure by implementing business continuity plans to promote the safety and
security of our employees, while complying with various government mandates, including work-from-home arrangements, social-distancing initiatives to reduce the transmission of COVID-19, and complying with federal and local regulations at our
facilities. The Company implemented a policy whereby all Company employees are required to be vaccinated or complete weekly COVID-19 testing. In addition, we created and executed programs utilizing our direct to consumer advertising and call
center to contact patients and partner clinics to restart our partners’ businesses. In the event our own employees are impacted through direct or ancillary contact with a person who has the virus, we may need to devise other methods of
transacting business in our offices by working from home and or potentially ceasing operations for a period of time. Supply chain disruptions which began during the pandemic have continued and may continue for the foreseeable future. While the
Company’s operations have not been materially impacted by the general trends in supply chain problems, the Company continues to monitor and assess potential risks. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on our results of
operations and financial performance for fiscal 2021, and we expect it will continue to have a negative impact on revenues, earnings and cash flows in fiscal 2022. Some physician offices continue to experience staffing issues, and we believe
these shortages of trained personnel have negatively impacted our business. Accordingly, current results and financial conditions discussed herein may not be indicative of future operating results and trends.
XTRAC and Pharos Systems and VTRAC Systems
The XTRAC and Pharos excimer laser technology emits highly concentrated UV light targeted primarily towards autoimmune dermatological skin disorders such as psoriasis, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis, and eczema, among
others. The XTRAC system received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) clearance in 2000 and the Pharos in 2004, and excimer laser has since become a widely recognized treatment for psoriasis, vitiligo and other skin diseases. Psoriasis and
vitiligo alone affect up to 13 million people in the U.S. and 190 million people worldwide. VTRAC is a UV light lamp system that works in much the same way as the XTRAC. It received FDA clearance in August 2005 and Conformité Européenne (“CE”)
mark approval in January 2006 and has been marketed exclusively in international markets.
Present in natural sunlight, ultraviolet B (“UVB”) is an accepted psoriasis treatment that penetrates the skin to slow the growth of damaged skin cells thereby placing the disease into remission for a period of
time. Studies have shown that the remission time can last three to six months or longer. In our XTRAC system, our targeted therapy approach delivers optimum amounts of UVB light directly to skin lesions, sparing healthy tissue. Many peer
reviewed studies have proven that the XTRAC excimer laser can clear psoriasis faster and produce longer remissions than other UVB modalities, resulting in fewer treatments to produce the desired result.
We currently market four XTRAC excimer models. In October 2018, we announced the launch of XTRAC S3®, which, as compared to previous XTRAC generations, is smaller, faster and has a new user interface. In January
2020, we announced the FDA granted clearance for our XTRAC Momentum Excimer Laser System platform. This clearance is the first full platform clearance since 2008. Momentum has an increased power range to improve patient safety and treatment
efficiency; a new and exclusive proprietary short-hair tip, providing ease of use in difficult-to-treat scalp psoriasis; and an enhanced user interface and database. We continue to market the XTRAC Velocity, our third-generation laser and the
XTRAC Ultra Plus, which is also a highly effective model marketed primarily in certain international markets. The Momentum, S3, Velocity and the Ultra Plus are capable of treating mild, moderate and severe psoriasis, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis
and leukoderma.
The XTRAC excimer laser is marketed in the U.S. mainly under a recurring revenue model in which we place the system in the physician’s office for no upfront charge and generate our revenue on a per-use basis
(referred to herein as the dermatology recurring procedures model or segment). We estimate that there are over 1,000 XTRAC lasers in use in the U.S., of which 890 systems were, as of December 31, 2021, included in our dermatology recurring
procedures revenue model. The Pharos business provides the opportunity for us to convert the customer base to our dermatology recurring procedures revenue model. The target U.S. audience for XTRAC lasers comprises approximately
3,500 dermatologists who perform disease management. Until 2019, in markets outside the U.S. the XTRAC laser had been marketed primarily as dermatology procedures equipment sales through distributors in over twenty-five countries. The VTRAC is
marketed exclusively in international markets through the same distributors.
Since 2019, we have been transitioning our international dermatology procedures equipment sales through our master
distributor to a direct distribution model for equipment sales and recurring revenue on a country by country basis. In January 2022 our agreement with our master distributor expired, and we decided to enter into direct contractual relationships
with our distributors. We have signed distributor contracts in Korea (in 2019), Japan (in 2020), China (in January 2021), Israel, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Bahrain, UAE, Jordan, and Iraq (in 2021). While we continue to promote the
recurring revenue model where appropriate, we have learned that the model not conducive to growth in some areas and in some circumstances, in which case we encourage our distributors to pursue capital sales.
Studies have concluded that XTRAC treatment leads to significant improvement in psoriasis plaques and severity scores in as few as six to ten treatments. Treatment protocols recommend that patients receive two
treatments per week with a minimum of 48 hours between treatments. Our data shows that treatment with XTRAC excimer lasers has an 89% efficacy rate and produces only minimal side effects. In support of its clinical effect, the XTRAC excimer
lasers have been cited in over 45 clinical studies and research programs, with findings published in peer-reviewed medical journals around the world. The XTRAC excimer laser has also been endorsed by the National Psoriasis Foundation, and its
use for psoriasis is covered by nearly all major insurance companies, including Medicare. XTRAC treatment is a reimbursable procedure for psoriasis under three Current Procedural Terminology (“CPT”) codes. There are three applicable CPT codes
that differ based on the total skin surface area being treated. Insurance Reimbursement to physicians varies based upon insurance company and location. The national CPT code reimbursement established by the Center for Medicaid Services (“CMS”),
which forms the basis for most insurance companies’ reimbursement levels, ranges for the three codes between $160 per treatment to $250 per treatment. (See “Third Party Reimbursement” below.)
Psoriasis, the Disease
The World Health Organization describes psoriasis as a chronic, noncommunicable, painful, disfiguring and disabling disease for which there is no cure, and which generates a great negative impact on patients’ quality
of life. It manifests itself in many forms and typically causes raised, red, scaly patches that appear on the skin and may cause itchiness, burning or stinging. Psoriasis is also associated with other serious health conditions such as diabetes,
heart disease and depression.
Psoriasis Treatment Options
There are essentially three main types of psoriasis treatments, as listed below:
Topical therapies: These can include corticosteroids, vitamin D3 derivatives, coal tar, anthralin and retinoids, among others, that are sold as a cream, gel, liquid, spray, or ointment. The efficacy of topical
agents varies from person to person, although these products are commonly associated with a loss of potency over time as people develop resistance.
Phototherapy: This is the area in which we operate. Our XTRAC Excimer Systems are FDA-cleared, reimbursed by insurance, and exhibit none of the significant side-effects associated with some alternative therapies.
Systemic medications: There are a number of prescription medications available for psoriasis, which are given either by mouth or as an injection. The popularity and use of these medications are growing
significantly, notwithstanding their cost and their potentially severe side-effects.
XTRAC excimer lasers are particularly significant and beneficial for mild to moderate psoriasis patients who prefer a noninvasive treatment approach without the side effects of invasive, systemic agents, or to
patients who have developed a resistance to topical agents. In many cases, patients treated with topical or systemic therapies are also candidates for phototherapy.
Using the XTRAC and Pharos Excimer Lasers to Treat Vitiligo and Other Skin Diseases
UV light therapy is considered to be an effective and safe treatment for many skin disorders beyond psoriasis. To this effect, the XTRAC technology is FDA cleared for the treatment of not only psoriasis but also
vitiligo (a skin pigment deficiency), atopic dermatitis (eczema) and leukoderma, which is a localized loss of skin pigmentation that occurs after an inflammatory skin condition such as a burn, intralesional steroid injection, or post
dermabrasion.
XTRAC technology for vitiligo patients typically requires more therapy sessions than for psoriasis but is dependent on the severity of the disease. In the treatment of vitiligo, we believe the XTRAC functions to
reactivate the skin’s melanocytes (the cells that produce melanin), which causes pigment to return. To date, there is not sufficient data to confirm how long patients can expect their vitiligo to be in remission after XTRAC therapy. Based on
anecdotal reports, we believe that re‑pigmentation may last for several years. Historically, vitiligo treatments had been considered cosmetic procedures by insurance companies, and as such were not reimbursed. However, over the past several
years, there has been a significant increase in insurance coverage for these procedures and we estimate that currently approximately 76% of insurers consider XTRAC treatments to be medically necessary for the treatment of vitiligo and therefore
provide coverage.
We believe that several factors have limited the growth of the use of XTRAC treatments from those who suffer from psoriasis and vitiligo. Specifically, we believe that awareness of the positive effects of XTRAC
treatments has not been high enough among both sufferers and providers; and that the treatment regimen requiring sometimes up to 12 or more treatments has limited XTRAC use to certain patient populations. Addressing the lack of knowledge issue,
we have a direct to patient advertising campaign aimed at motivating psoriasis and vitiligo patients to seek out XTRAC treatments from our physician partners. Specific advertisements encourage prospective patients to contact our patient advocacy
center via telephone or web site, wherein we provide information on the treatment and insurance coverage, and ultimately we can schedule an appointment for the prospective patient to be evaluated by a physician within our customer network,
convenient to their location, to determine if they would benefit from XTRAC treatments.
STRATAPEN
In January 2017, we entered into an OEM agreement with Esthetic Education, LLC to private label the STRATAPEN device. STRATAPEN® MicroSystems is a micropigmentation device that provides advanced technology offering
exceptional results. This contract expired in January 2020, but we continue to sell this product on a purchase order basis.
THERACLEAR
In January 2022 we acquired the TheraClear assets from Theravant Corporation. The TheraClear Acne System delivers a two-part process for treating inflammatory acne, pustular acne and comedonal acne that combines a
vacuum and broadband light that has been proven to clear skin rapidly for fast and visible reduction in acne and associated redness. Treatments are very comfortable, take 10 minutes to perform, are highly effective, and can be used on all skin
types.
Competition
Our XTRAC product line competes with pharmaceutical compounds and methodologies used to treat an array of skin conditions. Such alternative treatments may be in the form of topical products, systemic medications,
and phototherapies from both large pharmaceutical and smaller devices companies. Our major competitors for dermatological solutions include The Daavlin Company, National Biologic Corporation, and pharmaceutical companies producing topical
products and systemic and biologic medications. Currently, our XTRAC system is believed to be a competitive therapy to alternative treatments on the basis of its recognized clinical effect, minimal side effect profile, cost-effectiveness and
reimbursement.
Our TheraClear device competes with a range of over the counter treatment methodologies, as well as prescription only medications, and in-office treatment methodologies.
Manufacturing
We manufacture our XTRAC products at our 17,000 sq. ft. facility in Carlsbad, California. Our California facility is certified as ISO 13485 compliant. ISO 13485 is an International standardization written by the
International Organization for Standardization, which publishes requirements for a comprehensive quality management system for the design and manufacture of medical devices. Certification to the standard is awarded by accredited third parties.
We believe that our present manufacturing capacity at these facilities is sufficient to meet foreseeable demand for our products.
Research and Development Efforts
Our research and development team, including engineers, consists of approximately four employees. We conduct research and development activities at our facility located in Carlsbad, California. Our research and
development efforts are focused on the application of our XTRAC system for the treatment of inflammatory skin disorders.
Intellectual Property
Our policy is to protect our intellectual property by obtaining U.S. and foreign patents to protect technology, inventions and improvements important to the development of our business. As of December 31, 2021,
26 issued U.S. patents are in force, and many of these patents have foreign counterparts issued and pending. The Company maintains 15 patents from Mela Sciences, Inc. related to the MelaFind product.
We also rely on trade secrets and technical know-how in the manufacture and marketing of our products. We require our employees, consultants and contractors to execute confidentiality agreements with respect to our
proprietary information.
In February 2021, the license for the exclusive rights for patents related to the delivery of treatment to vitiligo with the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai expired. We do not believe that this will have a
material impact on our business.
We believe that our patented methods and apparatus, together with proprietary trade-secret technology and registered trademarks, give us a competitive advantage; however, whether a patent is infringed or is valid, or
whether or not a patent application should be granted, are all complex matters of science and law, and therefore, we cannot be certain that, if challenged, our patented methods and apparatus and/or trade-secret technology would be upheld. If one
or more of our patented methods, patented apparatus or trade-secret technology rights, or our trademark rights, are invalidated, rejected or found unenforceable, that could reduce or eliminate any competitive advantage we might otherwise have
had.
Government Regulation
Regulations Relating to Products and Manufacturing
Our products and research and development activities are regulated by numerous governmental authorities, principally the FDA and corresponding state and foreign regulatory agencies. Any medical device or cosmetic we
manufacture and/or distribute will be subject to pervasive and continuing regulation by the FDA. The U.S. Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act, or FD&C Act, and other federal and state laws and regulations govern the pre-clinical and clinical
testing, design, manufacture, use, labeling and promotion of medical devices, including our XTRAC, VTRAC, STRATAPEN and TheraClear devices. Product development and approval for medical devices within this regulatory framework takes a number of
years and involves the expenditure of substantial resources.
In the U.S., medical devices are classified into three different classes, Class I, II and III, on the basis of controls deemed necessary to provide a reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the
device. Class I devices are subject to general controls, such as facility registration, medical device listing, labeling requirements, premarket notification (unless the medical device has been specifically exempted from this requirement),
adherence to the FDA’s Quality System Regulation, and requirements concerning the submission of device-related adverse event reports to the FDA. Class II devices are subject to general and special controls, such as performance standards,
premarket notification (510(k) clearance), post-market surveillance, and FDA Quality System Regulations. Generally, Class III devices are those that must receive premarket approval by the FDA to provide a reasonable assurance of their safety and
effectiveness, such as life-sustaining, life-supporting and implantable devices, or new devices that have been found not to be substantially equivalent to existing legally marketed devices. Both XTRAC and TheraClear are Class II devices.
With limited exceptions, before a new medical device can be distributed in the U.S., marketing authorization typically must be obtained from the FDA through a premarket notification under Section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act, or through a premarket approval application under Section 515 of the FD&C Act. The FDA will typically grant a 510(k) clearance if it can be established that the device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device that is a
legally marketed Class I or II device (or to pre-amendments Class III devices for which the FDA has yet to call for premarket approvals). We have received FDA 510(k) clearance to market our XTRAC and VTRAC systems for the treatment of psoriasis,
vitiligo, atopic dermatitis and leukoderma. The FDA granted these clearances under Section 510(k) on the basis of substantial equivalence to other technologies that had received prior clearances.
For any devices that are cleared through the 510(k) process, modifications or enhancements that could significantly affect the safety or effectiveness of the device, or that constitute a major change in the intended
use of the device, will require a new 510(k) submission. In August 2003 the FDA granted 510(k) clearance for a significantly modified version of our XTRAC laser, which we have marketed as the XTRAC XL Plus Excimer Laser System. In October 2004
the FDA granted clearance for the XTRAC Ultra (AL 8000) Excimer Laser System and, in March 2008 we received 510(k) clearance for the XTRAC Velocity (AL 10000) Excimer Laser System. These approvals were originally granted to PhotoMedex, Inc. and
acquired by us in the June 2015 acquisition described above. In January 2020, we announced the FDA granted clearance of our XTRAC Momentum Excimer Laser platform.
The TheraClear device has been cleared by the FDA through the 510(k) process.
We are subject to routine inspection by the FDA and, as noted above, must comply with a number of regulatory requirements applicable to firms that manufacture medical devices and other FDA-regulated products for
distribution within the U.S., including requirements related to device labeling (including prohibitions against promoting products for unapproved or off-label uses), facility registration, medical device listing, adherence to the FDA’s Quality
System Regulation, good manufacturing processes and requirements for the submission of reports regarding certain device-related adverse events to the FDA.
We are also subject to the radiological health provisions of the FD&C Act and the general and laser-specific radiation safety regulations administered by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, or CDRH,
of the FDA. These regulations require laser manufacturers to file initial, new product, supplemental and annual reports, to maintain quality control, product testing and sales records, to incorporate certain design and operating features
(depending on the class of product) in lasers sold to end users pursuant to a performance standard and to certify and appropriately label each laser sold as belonging to one of four classes, based on the level of radiation from the laser that is
accessible to users. Moreover, we are obligated to repair, replace, or refund the cost of certain electronic products that are found to fail to comply with applicable federal standards or otherwise are found to be defective. The CDRH is empowered
to seek fines and other remedies for violations of the regulatory requirements. To date, we have filed the documentation with the CDRH for our laser products requiring such filing and have not experienced any difficulties or incurred significant
costs in complying with such regulations.
We are approved by the European Union to affix the CE mark to our XTRAC laser and VTRAC lamp systems. This certification is a mandatory conformity mark for products placed on the market in the European Economic Area,
which is evidence that they meet all European Community, or EC, quality assurance standards and compliance with applicable European medical device directives for the production of medical devices. This will enable us to market our approved
products in all of the member countries that accept the CE mark. We also are required to comply with additional individual national requirements that are in addition to those required by these nations. Our products have also met the requirements
for marketing in various other countries.
Our TheraClear device will be manufactured for us by a third party and we purchase our STRATAPEN devices from third parties, who are subject to the same regulations. We rely on these third parties to ensure
compliance with the regulations. Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements can result in fines, injunctions, civil penalties, recalls or seizures of products, total or partial suspensions of production, refusals by the U.S. and
foreign governments to permit product sales and criminal prosecution. We are, or may become, subject to various other federal, state, local and foreign laws, regulations and policies relating to, among other things, safe working conditions, good
laboratory practices and the use and disposal of hazardous or potentially hazardous substances used in connection with research and development.
Because of the significant federal funding involved in Medicare and Medicaid, Congress and the states have enacted, and actively enforce, a number of laws whose purpose is to eliminate fraud and abuse in federal health
care programs. Our business is subject to compliance with these laws.
Anti-Kickback Laws
In the U.S., there are federal and state anti-kickback laws that generally prohibit the payment or receipt of kickbacks, bribes or other remuneration in exchange for the referral of patients or other health-related
business. The U.S. federal healthcare programs’ Anti-Kickback Statute makes it unlawful for individuals or entities knowingly and willfully to solicit, offer, receive or pay any kickback, bribe or other remuneration, directly or indirectly, in
exchange for or to induce the purchase, lease or order, or arranging for or recommending purchasing, leasing, or ordering, any good, facility, service, or item for which payment may be made in whole or in part under a federal healthcare program
such as Medicare or Medicaid. The Anti-Kickback Statute covers “any remuneration,” which has been broadly interpreted to include anything of value, including for example gifts, certain discounts, the furnishing of free supplies, equipment or
services, credit arrangements, payments of cash and waivers of payments. Several courts have interpreted the statute’s intent requirement to mean that if any one purpose of an arrangement involving remuneration is to induce referrals of federal
healthcare covered business, the arrangement can be found to violate the statute. Penalties for violations include criminal penalties and civil sanctions such as fines, imprisonment and possible exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid and other federal
healthcare programs. In addition, several courts have permitted kickback cases brought under the Federal False Claims Act to proceed, as discussed in more detail below.
The reach of the Anti-Kickback Statute was broadened by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (the “ACA”), which, among other things, amends the intent requirement of the federal
Anti-Kickback Statute. Pursuant to the statutory amendment, a person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of this statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation. In addition, the ACA provides that the
government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the civil False Claims Act (discussed below) or the civil
monetary penalties statute, which imposes penalties against any person who is determined to have presented or caused to be presented a claim to a federal health program that the person knows or should know is for an item or service that was not
provided as claimed or is false or fraudulent.
Because the Anti-Kickback Statute is broadly written and encompasses many harmless or efficient arrangements, Congress authorized the Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or
OIG, to issue a series of regulations, known as “safe harbors.” For example, there are regulatory safe harbors for payments to bona fide employees, properly reported discounts and rebates, and for certain investment interests. Although an
arrangement that fits into one or more of these exceptions or safe harbors is immune from prosecution, arrangements that do not fit squarely within an exception or safe harbor do not necessarily violate the statute. The failure of a transaction or
arrangement to fit precisely within one or more of the exceptions or safe harbors does not necessarily mean that it is illegal or that prosecution will be pursued. However, conduct and business arrangements that arguably implicate the Anti-Kickback
Statute but do not fully satisfy all the elements of an exception or safe harbor may be subject to increased scrutiny by government enforcement authorities such as the OIG.
Many states have laws that implicate anti-kickback restrictions similar to the Anti-Kickback Statute. Some of these state prohibitions apply, regardless of whether federal health care program business is involved, to
arrangements such as for self-pay or private-pay patients. Government officials have focused their enforcement efforts on marketing of healthcare services and products, among other activities, and recently have brought cases against companies, and
certain sales, marketing and executive personnel, for allegedly offering unlawful inducements to potential or existing customers in an attempt to procure their business.
Federal Civil False Claims Act and State False Claims Laws
The federal civil False Claims Act imposes liability on any person or entity who, among other things, knowingly and willfully presents, or causes to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment by a federal
healthcare program, including Medicare and Medicaid. The “qui tam,” or “whistleblower” provisions of the False Claims Act allow a private individual to bring actions on behalf of the federal government alleging that the defendant has submitted a
false claim to the federal government, and to share in any monetary recovery. In recent years, the number of suits brought against healthcare providers by private individuals has increased dramatically. Medical device companies, like us, can be
held liable under false claims laws, even if they do not submit claims to the government, when they are deemed to have caused submission of false claims by, among other things, providing incorrect coding or billing advice about their products to
customers that file claims, or by engaging in kickback arrangements with customers that file claims.
The False Claims Act also has been used to assert liability on the basis of misrepresentations with respect to the services rendered and in connection with alleged off-label promotion of products. Our future activities
relating to the manner in which we sell our products and document our prices, such as the reporting of discount and rebate information and other information affecting federal, state and third-party reimbursement of our products, and the sale and
marketing of our products, may be subject to scrutiny under these laws.
When an entity is determined to have violated the False Claims Act, it may be required to pay up to three times the actual damages sustained by the government, plus civil penalties of $5,500 to
$11,000 for each separate false claim. There are many potential bases for liability under the False Claims Act. A number of states have enacted false claim laws analogous to the federal civil False Claims Act and many of these state laws apply
where a claim is submitted to any state or private third-party payer. In this environment, our engagement of physician consultants in product development and product training and education could subject us to similar scrutiny. We are unable to
predict whether we would be subject to actions under the False Claims Act or a similar state law, or the impact of such actions. However, the costs of defending such claims, as well as any sanctions imposed, could significantly affect our financial
performance.
HIPAA Fraud and Other Regulations
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, created a class of federal crimes known as the “federal health care offenses,” including healthcare fraud and false statements relating to
healthcare matters. The HIPAA health care fraud statute prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme or artifice to defraud any healthcare benefit program, or to obtain by means of false or
fraudulent pretenses, any money under the control of any health care benefit program, including private payers. A violation of this statute is a felony and may result in fines, imprisonment and/or exclusion from government-sponsored programs. The
HIPAA false statements statute prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or representation in connection with the
delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services. A violation of this statute is a felony and may result in fines and/or imprisonment. Entities that are found to have aided or abetted in a violation of the HIPAA federal health care
offenses are deemed by statute to have committed the offense and are punishable as a principal.
We are also subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar anti-bribery laws applicable in non-U.S. jurisdictions that generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments
to non-U.S. government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Because of the predominance of government-sponsored healthcare systems around the world, most of our customer relationships outside of the U.S. will be with
governmental entities and therefore subject to such anti-bribery laws.
Effective January 1, 2020, The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) became effective. The CCPA provides certain privacy protections for California residents not generally available to citizens of any other state. The
law provides California residents with the right to know that their personal data is being collected; know whether that data is being sold or disclosed; to prevent the sale of their personal information; to access their personal data; to request
that a business delete their personal information; and to not be discriminated against for exercising these rights.
HIPAA and Other Privacy Regulations
The regulations that implement HIPAA also establish uniform standards governing the conduct of certain electronic healthcare transactions and protecting the security and privacy of individually identifiable health
information maintained or transmitted by healthcare providers, health plans and healthcare clearinghouses, which are referred to as “covered entities.” Several regulations have been promulgated under HIPAA’s regulations including: the Standards for
Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information, or the Privacy Rule, which restricts the use and disclosure of certain individually identifiable health information; the Standards for Electronic Transactions, or the Transactions Rule, which
establishes standards for common healthcare transactions, such as claims information, plan eligibility, payment information and the use of electronic signatures; and the Security Standards for the Protection of Electronic Protected Health
Information, or the Security Rule, which requires covered entities to implement and maintain certain security measures to safeguard certain electronic health information. Although we do not believe we are a covered entity and therefore are not
currently directly subject to these standards, we expect that our customers generally will be covered entities and may ask us to contractually comply with certain aspects of these standards by entering into requisite business associate agreements.
While the government intended this legislation to reduce administrative expenses and burdens for the healthcare industry, our compliance with certain provisions of these standards entails significant costs for us.
The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health, or HITECH, Act has increased civil penalty amounts for violations of
HIPAA by either covered entities or business associates up to an annual maximum of $1.5 million for uncorrected violations based on willful neglect. Imposition of these penalties is more likely now because HITECH significantly strengthens
enforcement. It requires the Department of Health & Human Services (“HHS”) to conduct periodic audits to confirm compliance and to investigate any violation that involves willful neglect which carries mandatory penalties. Additionally, state
attorneys general are authorized to bring civil actions seeking either injunctions or damages in response to violations of HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules that threaten the privacy of state residents.
In addition to federal regulations issued under HIPAA, some states have enacted privacy and security statutes or regulations that, in some cases, are more stringent than those issued under HIPAA. In those cases, it
may be necessary to modify our planned operations and procedures to comply with the more stringent state laws. If we fail to comply with applicable state laws and regulations, we could be subject to additional sanctions.
Federal and state consumer protection laws are being applied increasingly by the United States Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, and state attorneys general to regulate the collection, use, storage and disclosure of
personal or patient information, through websites or otherwise, and to regulate the presentation of web site content. Courts may also adopt the standards for fair information practices promulgated by the FTC, which concern consumer notice, choice,
security and access. Numerous other countries have or are developing laws governing the collection, use, disclosure and transmission of personal or patient information.
HIPAA as well as other federal and state laws apply to our receipt of patient identifiable health information in connection with research and clinical trials. We collaborate with other individuals and entities in
conducting research and all involved parties must comply with applicable laws. Therefore, the compliance of the physicians, hospitals or other providers or entities with whom we collaborate also impacts our business.
Third-Party Reimbursement
Our ability to market our phototherapy products successfully depends in large part on the extent to which various third parties are willing to reimburse patients or providers for the cost of medical procedures
utilizing our treatment products. These third parties include government authorities, private health insurers and other organizations, such as health maintenance organizations. Third-party payers are systematically challenging the prices
charged for medical products and services. They may deny reimbursement if they determine that a prescribed device is not used in accordance with cost-effective treatment methods as determined by the payer, or is experimental, unnecessary or
inappropriate. Accordingly, if less costly drugs or other treatments are available, third-party payers may not authorize, or may limit, reimbursement for the use of our products, even if our products are safer or more effective than the
alternatives. Additionally, they may require changes to our pricing structure and revenue model before authorizing reimbursement.
Reimbursement systems in international markets vary significantly by country and by region within some countries, and reimbursement approvals must be obtained on a country-by-country basis. Many international
markets have government-managed healthcare systems that control reimbursement for new devices and procedures. In most markets, there are private insurance systems, as well as government-managed systems. Our XTRAC products remain substantially
without approval for reimbursement in many international markets under either government or private reimbursement systems. To date, patients of the TheraClear products have had limited success in obtaining third party reimbursement for such
treatments.
Many private plans key their reimbursement rates to rates set by the CMS under three distinct CPT codes based on the total skin surface area being treated.
As of December 31, 2021, the national rates were as follows:
• |
96920 – designated for: the total area less than 250 square centimeters. CMS assigned a 2021 national payment of $166 per treatment;
|
• |
96921 – designated for: the total area 250 to 500 square centimeters. CMS assigned a 2021 national payment of $181 per treatment; and
|
• |
96922 – designated for: the total area over 500 square centimeters. CMS assigned a 2021 national payment of $246 per treatment.
|
The national rates are adjusted by overhead factors applicable to each state.
Employees
As of December 31, 2021, we had 115 full-time employees, which consisted of 2 executive officers, 3 vice presidents, 61 sales and marketing staff, 18 people engaged in manufacturing of lasers, 16 customer-field service
personnel, 5 engaged in research and development and 10 finance and administration staff.
Customers
Domestically, our XTRAC customers consist of dermatologists and dermatological group clinics who partner with us in our dermatology procedures recurring revenue model. As of December 31, 2021, we have 890 partner
clinics throughout the United States. Internationally, we have been transitioning our international dermatology procedures equipment sales through our master distributor to a direct distribution model for equipment sales and recurring revenue on
a country by country basis. We have signed contracts in Korea (in 2019), Japan (in 2020), China (in January 2021), and a number of countries in the Middle East (in 2021).
Available Information
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Commission. These filings are available to the public on the Internet at the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
Our Internet address is http://www.strataskinsciences.com (this website address is not intended to function as a hyperlink and the information contained on our website is not intended to be a part of this Report). We
make available free of charge on https://strataskinsciencesinc.gcs-web.com/sec-filings our annual, quarterly and current reports, and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practical after we electronically file such material with, or
furnish it to, the Commission. We may from time to time provide important disclosures to investors by posting them in the Investor Relations section of our website, as allowed by the Commission’s rules. The information on the website listed above
is not and should not be considered part of this Report and is intended to be an inactive textual reference only.
In addition to the other information contained in this Report and the exhibits hereto, the following risk factors should be considered carefully in evaluating our business. Our business, financial
condition, cash flows or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also adversely affect our business, financial
condition, cash flows or results of operations. The following discussion of risk factors contains forward-looking statements as discussed on page 1. Our business routinely encounters and addresses risks, some of which may cause our future results
to be different – sometimes materially different – than we presently anticipate.
Risk Factor Summary
Risks Relating to Our Business Operations
• |
We have incurred losses for a number of years and anticipate that we will incur continued losses for the foreseeable future.
|
• |
The current outbreak of the novel coronavirus, or COVID-19, or the future outbreak of any other highly infectious or contagious diseases, could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and cash
flows.
|
• |
We may acquire other assets or businesses, or form collaborations or make investments in other companies or technologies that could harm our operating results, dilute our stockholders’ ownership, increase our debt or cause us to incur
significant expense.
|
• |
We may not be able to successfully integrate newly acquired businesses, joint ventures and other partnerships into our operations or achieve expected profitability from our acquisitions.
|
• |
Our laser treatments of psoriasis, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis and leukoderma and/or any of our future products or services may fail to gain market acceptance or be impacted by competitive products, services or therapies which could
adversely affect our competitive position.
|
• |
The success of our products depends on third-party reimbursement of patients’ costs, which could result in potentially reduced prices or reduced demand and adversely affect our revenues and business operations.
|
• |
The continuing development of our products depends upon our developing and maintaining strong working relationships with physicians.
|
• |
Any failure in our customer education efforts could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and cash flow.
|
• |
If revenue from significant customers declines, we may have difficulty replacing the lost revenue, which would negatively affect our results and operations.
|
• |
If we fail to manage our sales and marketing force or to market and distribute our products effectively, we may experience diminished revenues and profits.
|
• |
We are reliant on a limited number of suppliers for production of our products.
|
• |
Our failure to respond to rapid changes in technology and other applications in the medical devices industry or the development of a cure for skin conditions treated by our products could make our treatment system obsolete.
|
• |
Our customers, or physicians and technicians, as the case may be, may misuse certain of our products, and product liability lawsuits and other damages imposed on us may exceed our insurance coverage, or we may be subject to claims that
are not covered by insurance.
|
• |
We must comply with complex statutes prohibiting fraud and abuse, and both we and physicians utilizing our products could be subject to significant penalties for noncompliance.
|
• |
We may be subject, directly or indirectly, to federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations and could face substantial penalties if we are unable to fully comply with such laws.
|
• |
If the effectiveness and safety of our devices are not supported by long-term data, and the level of acceptance of our products by dermatologists does not increase or is not maintained, our revenues could decline.
|
• |
Our failure to obtain or maintain necessary FDA clearances and approvals, or to maintain continued clearances, or equivalents thereof in the U.S. and relevant foreign markets, could hurt our ability to distribute and market our products.
|
• |
If required, clinical trials necessary to support a 510(k) notice or PMA application, for new or modified products, will be expensive and will require the enrollment of large numbers of patients, and suitable patients may be difficult to
identify and recruit.
|
• |
Our medical device operations are subject to FDA regulatory requirements.
|
• |
Healthcare policy changes may have a material adverse effect on us.
|
• |
Our market acceptance in international markets requires regulatory approvals from foreign governments and may depend on third party reimbursement of participants’ cost.
|
• |
We face substantial competition, which may result in others discovering, developing or commercializing products more successfully than us.
|
• |
Consolidation in the medical device industry could have an adverse effect on our revenue and results of operations.
|
• |
We actively employ social media as part of our marketing strategy, which could give rise to regulatory violations, liability, breaches of data security or reputational damage.
|
• |
Social media companies on which we rely for advertising may change their policies limiting our ability to reach our target markets.
|
• |
We may become subject to claims of infringement or misappropriation of the intellectual property rights of others, which could prohibit us from shipping affected products, require us to obtain licenses from third parties or to develop
non-infringing alternatives, and subject us to substantial monetary damages and injunctive relief. Our patents may also be subject to challenge on validity grounds, and our patent applications may be rejected.
|
• |
If we or our third-party manufacturers or suppliers fail to comply with the FDA’s Quality System Regulation or any applicable state equivalent, our manufacturing operations could be interrupted and our potential product sales and
operating results could suffer.
|
• |
If we fail to comply with ongoing regulatory requirements, or if we experience unanticipated problems with products, these products could be subject to restrictions or withdrawal from the market.
|
• |
Our medical products may in the future be subject to product recalls that could harm our reputation, business and financial results.
|
• |
If any of our medical products cause or contribute to a death or a serious injury, or malfunction in certain ways, we will be subject to medical device reporting regulations, which can result in voluntary corrective actions or agency
enforcement actions.
|
• |
We may have a need for additional funds in the future and there is no guarantee that we will be able to generate those funds from our business.
|
• |
If we do not have enough capital to fund operations, then we will have to cut costs or raise funds.
|
• |
If our actual liability for state sales and use taxes is higher than our accrued liability, it could have a material impact on our financial condition.
|
• |
We may be subject to disruptions or failures in our information technology systems and network infrastructures, including through cyber-attacks or other third-party breaches that could have a material adverse effect on our business.
|
• |
Environmental and health safety laws may result in liabilities, expenses and restrictions on our operations.
|
Risks Relating to Our Common Stock
• |
In the event of certain contingencies, the investors in the May 2018 Equity Financing may receive additional shares issued pursuant to the Retained Risk Provisions as defined in the purchase agreements.
|
• |
Our stock price may be volatile, meaning purchasers of our common stock could incur substantial losses.
|
• |
Our charter documents and Delaware law may inhibit a takeover that stockholders consider favorable and could also limit the market price of our stock.
|
Risks Relating to Our Business Operations
We have incurred losses for a number of years and anticipate that we will incur continued losses for the near future.
Since 2015, we have devoted substantially all of our resources in the commercialization and sales of the XTRAC products. Our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2021 was approximately $2.7 million, and as of
December 31, 2021, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $221.7 million. Our losses, among other things, have had and may continue to have an adverse effect on the adequacy of our capitalization and cash flow. We believe that our cash
and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2021, combined with the anticipated revenues from the sale of our products, will be sufficient to satisfy our working capital needs, lasers placed-in-service, capital asset purchases, outstanding
commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with our existing operations through at least the next 12 months following the filing of this Report.
The current outbreak of the novel coronavirus, or COVID-19, or the future outbreak of any other highly infectious or contagious diseases, could materially and adversely affect our results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows. Further, the spread of the COVID-19 outbreak has caused severe disruptions in the U.S. and global economy and financial markets and could potentially create widespread business continuity issues of
an as yet unknown magnitude and duration.
In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) was reported to have surfaced in Wuhan, China. COVID-19 has since spread to over 100 countries, including every state in the United States. On March 11, 2020
the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic, and on March 13, 2020 the United States declared a national emergency with respect to COVID-19. In the last 24 months, the United States and the world have experienced various levels of
government shutdowns, closures and quarantines.
The outbreak of COVID-19 has severely impacted global economic activity and caused significant volatility and negative pressure in financial markets. The global impact of the outbreak has been rapidly evolving and
many countries, including the United States, have reacted by instituting quarantines, mandating business and school closures and restricting travel. This outbreak has triggered a period of global economic slowdown or a global recession which
could continue for some time which cannot be predicted. COVID-19 or another pandemic has or could have material and adverse effects on our ability to successfully operate our business due to, among other factors:
• |
a general decline in business activity;
|
• |
the destabilization of the markets and negative impacts on the healthcare system globally could negatively impact our ability to market and sell our products, including through the disruption of health care activities in general and
elective health care procedures in particular, the inability of our sales team to contact and/or visit doctors in person, patients’ interest in starting or continuing procedures involving our products and our ability to support patients
that presently use our products;
|
• |
difficulty accessing the capital and credit markets on favorable terms, or at all, and a severe disruption and instability in the global financial markets, or deteriorations in credit and financing conditions which could affect our
access to capital necessary to fund business operations;
|
• |
the potential negative impact on the health of our employees, especially if a significant number of them are impacted;
|
• |
the impact of the pandemic our customers, which may result in an increase in past due accounts receivable, write-offs and customer bankruptcies; and
|
• |
a deterioration in our ability to ensure business continuity during a disruption.
|
We may acquire other assets or businesses, or form collaborations or make investments in other companies or technologies that could harm our operating results, dilute our stockholders’ ownership,
increase our debt or cause us to incur significant expense.
As part of our business strategy, we may pursue acquisitions of assets, including preclinical, clinical or commercial stage products or product candidates, or businesses, or strategic alliances and collaborations, to
expand our existing technologies and operations. We may not identify or complete these transactions in a timely manner, on a cost-effective basis, or at all, and we may not realize the anticipated benefits of any such transaction, any of which
could have a detrimental effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. We have limited experience with acquiring other companies, products or product candidates, and limited experience with forming strategic alliances
and collaborations. We may not be able to find suitable acquisition candidates, and if we make any acquisitions, we may not be able to integrate these acquisitions successfully into our existing business and we may incur additional debt or assume
unknown or contingent liabilities in connection therewith. Integration of an acquired company or assets may also disrupt ongoing operations, require the hiring of additional personnel and the implementation of additional internal systems and
infrastructure, especially the acquisition of commercial assets, and require management resources that would otherwise focus on developing our existing business. We may not be able to find suitable strategic alliances or collaboration partners or
identify other investment opportunities, and we may experience losses related to any such investments.
To finance any acquisitions or collaborations, we may choose to issue debt or equity securities as consideration. Any such issuance of shares would dilute the ownership of our stockholders. If the price of our common
stock is low or volatile, we may not be able to acquire other assets or companies or fund a transaction using our stock as consideration. Alternatively, it may be necessary for us to raise additional funds for acquisitions through public or
private financings. Additional funds may not be available on terms that are favorable to us, or at all.
We may not be able to successfully integrate newly acquired businesses, joint ventures and other partnerships into our operations or achieve expected profitability from our acquisitions.
On January 10, 2022 we announced the acquisition of the TheraClear Acne Treatment Device. If we cannot successfully integrate acquisitions (including TheraClear), joint ventures and other partnerships on a timely
basis, we may be unable to generate sufficient revenue to offset acquisition costs, we may incur costs in excess of what we anticipate, and our expectations of future results of operations, including certain cost savings and synergies, may not be
achieved. Acquisitions involve substantial risks, including:
• |
unforeseen difficulties in integrating operations, technologies, services, accounting and personnel;
|
• |
diversion of financial and management resources from existing operations;
|
• |
unforeseen difficulties related to entering geographic regions where we do not have prior experience;
|
• |
risks relating to obtaining sufficient equity or debt financing; and
|
• |
potential loss of customers.
|
In addition, if we finance acquisitions by issuing equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities, our existing stockholders’ interests would be diluted, which, in turn, could adversely impact the market price of our stock.
Moreover, we could finance an acquisition with debt, resulting in higher leverage and interest costs and could increase losses and losses per share which could impact the price of our stock.
Our laser treatments of psoriasis, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis and leukoderma and/or any of our future products or services may fail to gain market acceptance or be impacted by competitive
products, services or therapies which could adversely affect our competitive position.
We have generated limited worldwide commercial distribution for our products. In the United States, our XTRAC systems are placed at physician offices at no upfront charge to the physician and we are generally paid on
a per-usage method where we retain ownership of the system. We cannot assure you that our products and services will find sufficient acceptance in the marketplace under our sales strategies.
We also face a risk that other companies in the market for dermatological products and services may be able to provide dermatologists a higher overall financial return and therefore compromise our ability to increase
our installed base of users and ensure they engage in optimal usage of our products. If, for example, such other companies have products or medical devices that require less time commitment from the dermatologist and yield an attractive return on
a dermatologist’s time and investment, we may find that our efforts to increase our base of users are hindered.
We also face a risk that the overall cost of systemic or biologic medications or treatment modalities become less expensive through the development of generics or other means. We may be faced with pressure to reduce
our costs to be competitive which may negatively impact our business. In addition, our business could be negatively impacted if these medications are prescribed for less severe cases of the diseases or if new, more effective or less expensive
medications are developed.
CPT codes for all procedures are subject to continued reevaluation. Should CMS reduce reimbursement for the CPT codes for XTRAC treatment or raise reimbursement for competitive products we may see a decline in our
recurring revenue business as well as a decline in new XTRAC installations.
Whether a treatment may be delegated to non-physician staff members and, if so, to whom and to what extent, are matters that may vary state by state, as these matters are within the province of the state medical
boards. In states that may be more restrictive in such delegation, a physician may decline to adopt the XTRAC system into his or her practice, deeming it to be fraught with too many constraints and finding other outlets for the physician’s time
and staff’s time to be more remunerative. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in persuading such medical boards that a liberal standard for delegation is appropriate for the XTRAC system, based on its design for ease and safety
of use. If we are not successful, we may find that even if a geographic region has wide insurance reimbursement, the region’s physicians may decline to adopt the XTRAC system into their practices.
We therefore cannot assure you that the marketplace will be receptive to our excimer laser technology over competing products, services and therapies or that a cure will not be found for the underlying diseases we
are focused on treating. Failure of our products to achieve market acceptance could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, while this introduction is specifically for those patients that might not be able to avail themselves of in-office treatments, it may be viewed by our partner clinics as a channel conflict and cause a
deterioration in our relationships with our current partners or negatively impact our ability to grow the number of partner clinics.
The success of our products depends on third-party reimbursement of patients’ costs, which could result in potentially reduced prices or reduced demand and adversely affect our revenues and
business operations.
Our ability to market our products successfully, especially XTRAC treatments, depends in large part on the extent to which various third parties are willing to reimburse patients or providers for the costs of medical
procedures utilizing such products. These third parties include government authorities, private health insurers and other organizations, such as health maintenance organizations, whose patterns of reimbursement may change as a result of new
standards for reimbursement determined by these third parties or because of the programs and policies enacted under the ACA.
Third-party payers are systematically challenging the prices charged for medical products and services. They may deny reimbursement if they determine that a prescribed device is not used in accordance with
cost-effective treatment methods as determined by the payer, or is experimental, unnecessary or inappropriate. Further, although third parties may approve reimbursement, such approvals may be under terms and conditions that discourage use of the
XTRAC system. Accordingly, if less costly drugs or other treatments are available, third-party payers may not authorize or may limit reimbursement for the use of our products, even if our products are safer or more effective than the
alternatives.
In addition, medical insurance policies and treatment coverage have been and may be affected by the parameters of the ACA or successor policies enacted by the current or any new administration. While the ACA’s stated
purpose is to expand access to coverage, it also mandates certain requirements regarding the types and limitations of insurance coverage. There can be no guarantee that the changes in coverage under the ACA will not affect the type and level of
reimbursement for our products.
Although we have received reimbursement approvals from a majority of private healthcare plans for the XTRAC system, we cannot give assurance that these private plans will continue to adopt or maintain favorable
reimbursement policies or accept the XTRAC system in its clinical role as a second-line therapy in the treatment of psoriasis. Additionally, third-party payers may require further clinical studies or changes to our pricing structure and revenue
model before authorizing or continuing reimbursement.
As of March 10, 2020, we estimate, based on published coverage policies and on payment practices of private and Medicare insurance plans, that more than 86% of the insured population in the U.S. is covered by
insurance coverage or payment policies that reimburse physicians for using the XTRAC system for treatment of psoriasis. We can give no assurance that health insurers will not adversely modify their reimbursement policies for the use of the XTRAC
system in the future.
Currently, there is little insurance reimbursement coverage for acne treatments, such as those provided by TheraClear. In order for TheraClear to be successful, patients and decision makers will need to be able to
pay for treatments without insurance reimbursement.
The continuing development of our products depends upon our developing and maintaining strong working relationships with physicians.
The research, development, marketing and sale of our current products and any potential new and improved products or future product indications for which we receive regulatory clearance or approval depend upon our
maintaining working relationships with physicians. We rely on these professionals to provide us with considerable knowledge and experience regarding the development, marketing and sale of our products. Physicians assist us as researchers,
marketing and product consultants and public speakers. If we cannot maintain our strong working relationships with these professionals and continue to receive their advice and input, the development and marketing of our products could suffer,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. At the same time, companies in the medical device industry are under increasing scrutiny by the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services Office of Inspector General, or OIG, and the U.S. Department of Justice, or DOJ for improper relationships with physicians. Our failure to comply with requirements governing the industry’s relationships with physicians, including the
reporting of certain payments to physicians under the National Physician Payment Transparency Program (Open Payments) or an investigation into our compliance by the OIG or the DOJ, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, and results of operations.
Any failure in our customer education efforts could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and cash flow.
It is important to the success of our marketing efforts to educate physicians and technicians how to properly use our products. We rely on physicians to spend their time and money to participate in our
pre-installation educational sessions. Moreover, if physicians and technicians use our products improperly, they may have unsatisfactory patient outcomes or, in the case of the XTRAC system, cause patient injury, which may give rise to negative
publicity or lawsuits against us, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, revenues and profitability.
If revenue from significant customers declines, we may have difficulty replacing the lost revenue, which would negatively affect our results and operations.
In our international business, we depend for a material portion of our sales in the international arena on several key sub-distributors. Historically, we relied on a single master distributor, GlobalMed, for
international sales of our XTRAC and VTRAC products. Our agreement with GlobalMed expired on January 1, 2022 and over the last two years we have transitioned away from the historical relationship with GlobalMed and entered into direct
relationships with in-country distributors and have been working to replace GlobalMed’s historical position and significance.
If we fail to manage our sales and marketing force or to market and distribute our products effectively, we may experience diminished revenues and profits.
There are significant risks involved in managing our sales and marketing force and marketing our products, including our ability:
• |
to hire, as needed, a sufficient number of qualified sales and marketing personnel with the aptitude, skills and understanding to market our products;
|
• |
to adequately train our sales and marketing force in the use and benefits of all our products and services, thereby making them more effective promoters;
|
• |
to manage our sales and marketing force and our ancillary channels (e.g., telesales) such that variable and semi-fixed expenses grow at a lesser rate than our revenues; and
|
• |
to set the prices and other terms and conditions for treatments using the XTRAC system in a complex legal environment so that treatments will be accepted as attractive skin health and appropriate alternatives to conventional modalities
and treatments
|
To increase acceptance and utilization of our products, we may expand our sales and marketing programs in the U.S. While we may be able to draw on currently available personnel within our organization to meet this
need, we also expect that we will have to increase the number of representatives devoted to the sales and marketing programs and to broaden, through such representatives, the talents we have at our disposal. In some cases, we may look outside our
organization for assistance in marketing our products.
We are reliant on a limited number of suppliers for production of our products.
Production of our products requires specific component parts obtained from our suppliers. While we believe that we could find alternate suppliers, in the event that our current suppliers fail to meet our needs, a
change in suppliers or any significant delay in our ability to have access to such resources could have a material adverse effect on our delivery schedules, business, operating results and financial condition. Moreover, in the event we can no
longer utilize this supplier or acquire this resource and must identify a new supplier or substitute a different resource, such change may trigger an obligation for us to comply with additional FDA regulatory requirements including, but not
limited to, premarketing authorization and Quality System Requirements (“QSR”).
Our failure to respond to rapid changes in technology and other applications in the medical devices industry or the development of a cure for skin conditions treated by our products could make our
treatment system obsolete.
The medical device industry is subject to rapid and substantial technological development and product innovations. To be successful, we must respond to new developments in technology, new applications of existing
technology and new treatment methods. Our financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected if we fail to be responsive on a timely and effective basis to competitors’ new devices, applications, treatments or price strategies.
For example, the development of a cure for psoriasis, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis or leukoderma would eliminate the need for our XTRAC system for these diseases and would require us to focus on other uses of our technology, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business and prospects.
As we develop new products or improve our existing products, we may accelerate the economic obsolescence of the existing, unimproved products and their components. The obsolete products and related components may
have little to no resale value, leading to an increase in the reserves we have against our inventory. Likewise, there is a risk that the new products or improved existing products may not achieve market acceptance and therefore may also lead to
an increase in the reserves against our inventory.
Our customers, or physicians and technicians, as the case may be, may misuse certain of our products, and product liability lawsuits and other damages imposed on us may exceed our insurance
coverage, or we may be subject to claims that are not covered by insurance.
We face an inherent risk of product liability as a result of the marketing and sale of our products. For example, we may be sued if our products cause or are perceived to cause injury or are found to be otherwise
unsuitable during manufacturing, marketing or sale. Any such product liability claim may include allegations of defects in manufacturing, defects in design, a failure to warn of dangers inherent in the product, negligence, strict liability or
breach of warranty. Our products are highly complex, and some are used to treat delicate skin conditions on and near a patient’s face. In addition, the clinical testing, manufacturing, marketing and use of certain of our products and procedures
may also expose us to product liability, FDA regulatory and/or legal actions, or other claims. If a physician elects to apply an off-label use and the use leads to injury, we may be involved in costly litigation. In addition, the fact that we
train technicians whom we do not supervise in the use of our XTRAC system during patient treatment may expose us to third-party claims if we are accused of providing inadequate training. We may also be subject to claims against us even if the
apparent injury is due to the actions of others or the pre-existing health of the patient. For example, we rely on physicians in connection with the use of our products on patients. If these physicians are not properly trained or are negligent,
the capabilities and safety features of our products may be diminished or the patient may suffer critical injury. We may also be subject to claims that are caused by the actions of our suppliers, such as those who provide us with components and
sub-assemblies.
We presently maintain liability insurance with coverage limits of at least $5.0 million per occurrence and overall aggregate, which we believe is an adequate level of product liability insurance, but product
liability insurance is expensive and we might not be able to obtain product liability insurance in the future on acceptable terms or in sufficient amounts to protect us, if at all. Our insurance policy contains various exclusions, and we may be
subject to a product liability claim for which we have no coverage. A successful claim brought against us in excess of our insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Even successful defense would require significant financial and management resources. In addition, continuing insurance coverage may also not be available at an acceptable cost, if at all. Therefore, we may not be able to obtain insurance
coverage that will be adequate to satisfy a liability that may arise. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, product liability claims may result in decreased demand for a product, harm to our reputation, withdrawal of clinical trial volunteers,
initiation of investigations by regulators, costs to defend the related litigation, diversion of management’s time and our resources, monetary awards to trial participants or patients, product recalls, withdrawals or labeling, marketing or
promotional restrictions, exhaustion of any available insurance and our capital resources, a resulting decline in the price of our common stock and loss of revenues. As a result, regardless of whether we are insured, a product liability claim or
product recall may result in losses that could result in the FDA taking legal or regulatory enforcement action against us and/or our products including recall, and could have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
We must comply with complex statutes prohibiting fraud and abuse, and both we and physicians utilizing our products could be subject to significant penalties for noncompliance.
There are extensive federal and state laws and regulations prohibiting fraud and abuse in the healthcare industry that can result in significant criminal and civil penalties. These federal laws include:
• |
the anti-kickback statute which prohibits certain business practices and relationships, including the payment or receipt of remuneration for the referral of patients whose care will be paid by Medicare or other federal healthcare
programs, as modified by the ACA;
|
• |
the physician self-referral prohibition, commonly referred to as the Stark Law;
|
• |
the anti-inducement law, which prohibits providers from offering anything to a Medicare or Medicaid beneficiary to induce that beneficiary to use items or services covered by either program; the Civil False Claims Act, which prohibits
any person from knowingly presenting or causing to be presented false or fraudulent claims for payment by the federal government, including the Medicare and Medicaid programs; and
|
• |
the Civil Monetary Penalties Law, which authorizes HHS to impose civil penalties administratively for fraudulent or abusive acts. Sanctions for violating these federal laws include criminal and civil penalties that range from punitive
sanctions, damage assessments, monetary penalties, and imprisonment, denial of Medicare and Medicaid payments, or exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, or both.
|
As federal and state budget pressures continue, federal and state administrative agencies may also continue to escalate investigation and enforcement efforts to root out waste and to control fraud and abuse in
governmental healthcare programs. Private enforcement of healthcare fraud has also increased, due in large part to amendments to the Civil False Claims Act in 1986 that were designed to encourage private persons to sue on behalf of the
government. A violation of any of these federal and state fraud and abuse laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and financial condition. An investigation into the use of our products by physicians may dissuade
physicians from either purchasing or using our products and could have a material adverse effect on our revenues.
We may be subject, directly or indirectly, to federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations and could face substantial penalties if we are unable to fully comply with such
laws.
While we do not control referrals of healthcare services or bill directly to Medicare, Medicaid or other third-party payers, many healthcare laws and regulations apply to our business. For example, we could be
subject to healthcare fraud and abuse and patient privacy regulation and enforcement by both the federal government and the states in which we conduct our business. The healthcare laws and regulations that may affect our ability to operate
include:
• |
the federal healthcare programs’ anti-kickback laws, as modified by the ACA, which prohibits, among other things, persons or entities from soliciting, receiving, offering or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, in return for
or to induce either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase order or recommendation of, any item or service for which payment may be made under a federal healthcare program such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs;
|
• |
federal false claims laws which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment from Medicare, Medicaid, or other third-party payers that are false or
fraudulent, or are for items or services not provided as claimed and which may apply to entities like us to the extent that our interactions with customers may affect their billing or coding practices;
|
• |
HIPAA, which established new federal crimes for knowingly and willfully executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or making false statements in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items
or services, as well as leading to regulations imposing certain requirements relating to the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information; and
|
• |
state law equivalents of each of the above federal laws, such as anti-kickback and false claims laws which may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party payer, including commercial insurers, and state laws governing the
privacy of health information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.
|
The medical device industry has been under heightened scrutiny as the subject of government investigations and regulatory or legal enforcement actions involving manufacturers who allegedly offered unlawful
inducements to potential or existing customers in an attempt to procure their business, including arrangements with physician consultants. If our operations or arrangements are found to be in violation of any of the laws described above or any
other governmental regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs and the curtailment or restructuring of its operations. Any
penalties, damages, fines, exclusions, curtailment or restructuring of our operations could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our financial results. The risk of us being found in violation of these laws is increased by the
fact that many of these laws are broad and their provisions are open to a variety of interpretations. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against that action and the underlying alleged violations,
could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert our management’s attention from the operation of our business. If the physicians or other providers or entities with whom we do business are found to be non-compliant with applicable
laws, they may be subject to sanctions, which could also have a negative impact on our business.
If the effectiveness and safety of our devices are not supported by long-term data, and the level of acceptance of our products by dermatologists does not increase or is not maintained, our
revenues could decline.
Our products may not be accepted in the market if we do not produce clinical data supported by the independent efforts of clinicians. We received clearance from the FDA for the use of the XTRAC system to treat
psoriasis based upon our study of a limited number of patients. Safety and efficacy data presented to the FDA for the XTRAC system was based on studies on these patients. For the treatment of vitiligo, atopic dermatitis and leukoderma, we have
received clearance from the FDA for the use of the XTRAC system based primarily on a showing of substantial equivalence to other previously cleared predicate devices. However, we may discover that physicians will expect clinical data on such
treatments with the XTRAC system. We also may find that data from longer-term psoriasis patient follow-up studies may be inconsistent with those indicated by our relatively short-term data. If longer-term patient studies or clinical experience
indicate that treatment with the XTRAC system does not provide patients with sustained benefits or that treatment with our product is less effective or less safe than our current data suggests, our revenues could decline. In addition, the FDA
could then bring legal or regulatory enforcement actions against us and/or our products including, but not limited to, recalls or requirements for premarket 510(k) authorizations. We can give no assurance that our data will be substantiated in
studies involving more patients. In such a case, we may never achieve significant revenues or profitability.
Our failure to obtain or maintain necessary FDA clearances and approvals, or to maintain continued clearances, or equivalents thereof in the U.S. and relevant foreign markets, could hurt our
ability to distribute and market our products.
In both our U.S. and foreign markets, we are affected by extensive laws, governmental regulations, administrative determinations, court decisions and similar constraints. Such laws, regulations and other constraints
may exist at the federal, state or local levels in the U.S. and at analogous levels of government in foreign jurisdictions. In addition, the formulation, manufacturing, packaging, labeling, distribution, importation, sale and storage of our
products are subject to extensive regulation by various federal agencies, including, but not limited to, the FDA and the FTC, State Attorneys General in the U.S., as well as by various other federal, state, local and international regulatory
authorities in the countries in which our products are manufactured, distributed or sold. If we or our manufacturers fail to comply with those regulations, we could become subject to significant penalties or claims, which could harm our results
of operations or our ability to conduct our business. In addition, the adoption of new regulations or changes in the interpretations of existing regulations may result in significant compliance costs or discontinuation of product sales and may
impair the marketing of our products, resulting in significant loss of net sales. Our failure to comply with federal or state regulations, or with regulations in foreign markets that cover our product claims and advertising, including direct
claims and advertising by us, may result in enforcement actions and imposition of penalties or otherwise harm the distribution and sale of its products. Further, our businesses are subject to laws governing our accounting, tax and import and
export activities. Failure to comply with these requirements could result in legal and/or financial consequences that might adversely affect our sales and profitability. Each medical device that we wish to market in the U.S. must first receive
either 510(k) clearance or PMA from the FDA unless an exemption applies. Either process can be lengthy and expensive. The FDA’s 510(k) clearance process may take from three to 12 months, or longer, and may or may not require human clinical data.
The PMA process is much more costly and lengthy. It may take from 11 months to three years, or even longer, and will likely require significant supporting human clinical data. Delays in obtaining regulatory clearance or approval could adversely
affect our revenues and profitability. Although we have obtained 510(k) clearances for our XTRAC system for use in treating psoriasis, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis and leukoderma, these approvals and clearances may be subject to revocation if
post-marketing data demonstrates safety issues or lack of effectiveness.
Many medical devices, such as medical lasers, are also regulated by the FDA as “electronic products.” In general, manufacturers and marketers of “electronic products” are subject to certain FDA regulatory
requirements intended to ensure the radiological safety of the products. These requirements include, but are not limited to, filing certain reports with the FDA about the products and defects/safety issues related to the products as well as
complying with radiological performance standards.
The medical device industry is now experiencing greater scrutiny and regulation by federal, state and foreign governmental authorities. Companies in our industry are subject to more frequent and more intensive
reviews and investigations, often involving the marketing, business practices, and product quality management. Such reviews and investigations may result in civil and criminal proceedings; the imposition of substantial fines and penalties; the
receipt of warning letters, untitled letters, demands for recalls or the seizure of our products; the requirement to enter into corporate integrity agreements, stipulated judgments or other administrative remedies, and result in our incurring
substantial unanticipated costs and the diversion of key personnel and management’s attention from their regular duties, any of which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity, and may result in
greater and continuing governmental scrutiny of our business in the future.
Additionally, federal, state and foreign governments and entities have enacted laws and issued regulations and other standards requiring increased visibility and transparency of our interactions with healthcare
providers. For example, the U.S. Physician Payment Sunshine Act, now known as Open Payments, requires us to report to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, payments and other transfers of value to all U.S. physicians and U.S.
teaching hospitals, with the reported information made publicly available on a searchable website. Effective January 2022 we are also required to collect and report information on payments or transfers of value to physician assistants, nurse
practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, certified registered nurse anesthetists and certified nurse-midwives. Failure to comply with these legal and regulatory requirements could impact our business, and we have had and will continue to spend
substantial time and financial resources to develop and implement enhanced structures, policies, systems and processes to comply with these legal and regulatory requirements, which may also impact our business and which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
International regulatory approval processes may take more or less time than the FDA clearance or approval process. If we fail to comply with applicable FDA and comparable non-U.S. regulatory requirements, we may not
receive regulatory clearances or approvals or may be subject to FDA or comparable non-U.S. enforcement actions. We may be unable to obtain future regulatory clearance or approval in a timely manner, or at all, especially if existing regulations
are changed or new regulations are adopted. For example, the FDA clearance or approval process can take longer than anticipated due to requests for additional clinical data and changes in regulatory requirements. A failure or delay in obtaining
necessary regulatory clearances or approvals would materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Further, more stringent regulatory requirements or safety and quality standards may be issued in the future with an adverse effect on our business. We have ceased manufacturing and marketing MelaFind but must still
maintain records for FDA and foreign regulatory purposes.
If required, clinical trials necessary to support a 510(k) notice or PMA application, for new or modified products, will be expensive and will require the enrollment of large numbers of patients,
and suitable patients may be difficult to identify and recruit. Delays or failures in our clinical trials will prevent us from commercializing any modified or new products and will adversely affect our business, operating results and prospects.
Initiating and completing clinical trials necessary to support a 510(k) notice or a PMA application will be time-consuming and expensive and the outcome uncertain. Moreover, the results of early clinical trials are
not necessarily predictive of future results, and any product we advance into clinical trials may not have favorable results in early or later clinical trials.
Conducting successful clinical studies will require the enrollment of large numbers of patients, and suitable patients may be difficult to identify and recruit. Patient enrollment in clinical trials and completion of
patient participation and follow-up depend on many factors, including the size of the patient population, the nature of the trial protocol, the attractiveness of, or the discomforts and risks associated with, the treatments received by patients
enrolled as subjects, the availability of appropriate clinical trial investigators, support staff, and proximity of patients to clinical sites and ability to comply with the eligibility and exclusion criteria for participation in the clinical
trial and patient compliance. For example, patients may be discouraged from enrolling in our clinical trials if the trial protocol requires them to undergo extensive post-treatment procedures or follow-up to assess the safety and effectiveness of
our products or if they determine that the treatments received under the trial protocols are not attractive or involve unacceptable risks or discomforts. Patients may also not participate in our clinical trials if they choose to participate in
contemporaneous clinical trials of competitive products. In addition, patients participating in clinical trials may die before completion of the trial or suffer adverse medical events unrelated to investigational products.
Development of sufficient and appropriate clinical protocols to demonstrate safety and efficacy may be required and we may not adequately develop such protocols to support clearance and approval. Further, the FDA may
require us to submit data on a greater number of patients than we originally anticipated and/or for a longer follow-up period or change the data collection requirements or data analysis for any clinical trials. Delays in patient enrollment or
failure of patients to continue to participate in a clinical trial may cause an increase in costs and delays in the approval and attempted commercialization of our products or result in the failure of the clinical trial. The FDA may not consider
our data adequate to demonstrate safety and efficacy. Such increased costs and delays or failures could adversely affect our business, operating results and prospects.
Our medical device operations are subject to FDA regulatory requirements.
Medical devices regulated by the FDA are subject to “general controls” which include: registration with the FDA; listing commercially distributed products with the FDA; complying with good manufacturing practices
under the quality system regulations; filing reports with the FDA and keeping records relative to certain types of adverse events associated with devices under the medical device reporting regulation; assuring that device labeling complies with
device labeling requirements; reporting certain device field removals and corrections to the FDA; and obtaining premarket notification 510(k) clearance for devices prior to marketing. Some devices known as “510(k)-exempt” can be marketed without
prior marketing clearance or approval from the FDA. In addition to the “general controls,” some Class II medical devices are also subject to “special controls,” including adherence to a particular guidance document and compliance with the
performance standard. Instead of obtaining 510(k) clearance, some Class III devices are subject to PMA. In general, obtaining PMA to achieve marketing authorization from the FDA is a more onerous process than seeking 510(k) clearance.
Many medical devices, such as medical lasers, are also regulated by the FDA as “electronic products.” In general, manufacturers and marketers of “electronic products” are subject to certain FDA regulatory
requirements intended to ensure the radiological safety of the products. These requirements include, but are not limited to, filing certain reports with the FDA about the products and defects/safety issues related to the products as well as
complying with radiological performance standards.
The medical device industry is now experiencing greater scrutiny and regulation by federal, state and foreign governmental authorities. Companies in our industry are subject to more frequent and more intensive
reviews and investigations, often involving the marketing, business practices, and product quality management including standards for device recalls and product labeling. Such reviews and investigations may result in civil and criminal
proceedings; the imposition of substantial fines and penalties; the receipt of warning letters, untitled letters, demands for recalls or the seizure of our products; the requirement to enter into corporate integrity agreements, stipulated
judgments or other administrative remedies, and result in our incurring substantial unanticipated costs and the diversion of key personnel and management’s attention from their regular duties, any of which may have an adverse effect on our
financial condition, results of operations and liquidity, and may result in greater and continuing governmental scrutiny of our business in the future.
We must also have the appropriate FDA clearances and/or approvals from other governmental entities in order to lawfully market devices and/or drugs. The FDA, federal, state or foreign governments and agencies may
disagree that we have such clearance and/or approvals for all of our products and may take action to prevent the marketing and sale of such devices until such disagreements have been resolved.
Additionally, federal, state and foreign governments and entities have enacted laws and issued regulations and other standards requiring increased visibility and transparency of our interactions with healthcare
providers. For example, the U.S. Physician Payment Sunshine Act requires us to disclose payments and other transfers of value to all U.S. physicians and U.S. teaching hospitals at the U.S. federal level made. Failure to comply with these legal
and regulatory requirements could impact our business, and we have had and will continue to spend substantial time and financial resources to develop and implement enhanced structures, policies, systems and processes to comply with these legal
and regulatory requirements, which may also impact our business.
Healthcare policy changes may have a material adverse effect on us.
Healthcare costs have risen significantly over the past decade. As a result, there have been and continue to be proposals by federal, state and foreign governments and regulators as well as third-party insurance
providers to limit the growth of these costs. Among these proposals are regulations that could impose limitations on the prices we will be able to charge for our products, the amounts of reimbursement available for our products from governmental
agencies or third-party payers, requirements regarding the usage of comparative studies, technology assessments and healthcare delivery structure reforms to determine the effectiveness and select the products and therapies used for treatment of
patients. While we believe our products provide favorable clinical outcomes, value and cost efficiency, the resources necessary to demonstrate this value to our customers, patients, payers, and regulators is significant and may require longer
periods of time and effort in which to obtain acceptance of our products. There is no assurance that our efforts will be successful, and these limitations could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
These changes and additional proposed changes in the future could adversely affect the demand for our products as well as the way in which we conduct our business. For example, the ACA was enacted into law in the
U.S. in March 2010. They imposed on medical device manufacturers, a requirement to research into the effectiveness of treatment modalities and institute changes to the reimbursement and payment systems for patient treatments. In addition,
governments and regulatory agencies continue to study and propose changes to the laws governing the clearance or approval, manufacture and marketing of medical devices, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
FDA regulations and guidance are often revised or reinterpreted by the FDA in ways that may significantly affect our business and our products. The FDA is currently exploring ways to modify its 510(k) clearance
process. In addition, due to changes at the FDA in general, it has become increasingly more difficult to obtain 510(k) clearance as data requirements have increased. It is impossible to predict whether legislative changes will be enacted or FDA
regulations, guidance or interpretations changed, and what the impact of such changes, if any, may be. However, any changes could make it more difficult for us to maintain or attain clearance or approval to develop and commercialize our products
and technologies.
Various healthcare reform proposals have also emerged at the state level. We cannot predict what healthcare initiatives, if any, will be implemented at the federal or state level, or the effect any future legislation
or regulation will have on us. Furthermore, an expansion in government’s role in the U.S. healthcare industry may lower reimbursements for our products, reduce medical procedure volumes and adversely affect our business, possibly materially. In
addition, if the excise taxes contained in the House or Senate health reform bills are enacted into law, our loss from continuing operations resulting from such an excise tax and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.
Our market acceptance in international markets requires regulatory approvals from foreign governments and may depend on third party reimbursement of participants’ cost.
We have introduced our XTRAC and VTRAC products into markets in more than 30 countries in Europe, the Middle East, Asia, Australia, South Africa and parts of Central and South America through distributors. We cannot
be certain that our salesforce and distributor network will be successful in marketing our products in these or other countries or that our distributors will purchase XTRAC or VTRAC systems beyond their current contractual obligations or in
accordance with our expectations. Our TheraClear device has historically been sold in several foreign countries and is subject to similar international regulatory approval requirements.
Even if we obtain and maintain the necessary foreign regulatory registrations or approvals, market acceptance of our products in international markets may be dependent, in part, upon the availability of reimbursement
within applicable healthcare payment systems. Reimbursement and healthcare payment systems in international markets vary significantly by country, and include both government-sponsored healthcare and private insurance. We may seek international
reimbursement approvals for our products, but we cannot assure you that any such approvals will be obtained in a timely manner, if at all. Failure to receive international reimbursement approvals in any given market could have a material adverse
effect on the acceptance or growth of our products in that market or others.
We face substantial competition, which may result in others discovering, developing or commercializing products more successfully than us.
The medical device industry is intensely competitive and subject to rapid and significant technological change. Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial, technical and human resources. Smaller and
early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies.
Our competitors in medical device or pharmaceutical industries may also develop products that are more effective, more convenient, more widely used, less costly, or have a better safety profile than our products and
these competitors may also be more successful than us in manufacturing and marketing their products.
Our competitors also compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific, management and commercial personnel, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs.
Competition for these people in the medical device industry is intense and we may face challenges in retaining and recruiting such individuals if, for example, other companies may provide more generous compensation and benefits, more diverse
opportunities, and better chances for career advancement than we do. Some of these advantages may be more appealing to high-quality candidates and employees than those we have to offer. In addition, the decline in our stock price has created
additional challenges by reducing the retention value of our equity awards. Because of the complex and technical nature of our systems and the dynamic market in which we compete, any failure to attract and retain a sufficient number of qualified
employees could materially harm our ability to develop and commercialize our technology, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Consolidation in the medical device industry could have an adverse effect on our revenue and results of operations.
Many medical device industry companies are consolidating to create new companies with greater market power. As the medical device industry consolidates, competition to provide goods and services to industry
participants will become more intense. These industry participants may try to use their market power to bundle the sale of more products to our customers in return for lower prices. If we reduce our prices because of consolidation in the
healthcare industry, our revenue would decrease and our earnings, financial condition, or cash flows would suffer, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We actively employ social media as part of our marketing strategy, which could give rise to regulatory violations, liability, breaches of data security or reputational damage.
Despite our efforts to monitor evolving social media communication guidelines and comply with applicable rules, there is risk that the use of social media by us, our employees or our customers to communicate about
our products or business may cause us to be found in violation of applicable requirements, including requirements of regulatory bodies such as the FDA and Federal Trade Commission. For example, promotional communications and endorsements on
social media that, among other things, promote our products for uses or in patient populations that are not described in the product’s approved labeling (known as “off-label uses”), do not contain a fair balance of information about risks
associated with using our products, make comparative or other claims about our products that are not supported by sufficient evidence, and/or do not contain required disclosures could result in enforcement actions against us. In addition, adverse
events, product complaints, off-label usage by physicians, unapproved marketing or other unintended messages posted on social media could require an active response from us, which may not be completed in a timely manner and could result in
regulatory action by a governing body. Further, our employees may knowingly or inadvertently make use of social media in ways that may not comply with our corporate policies or other legal or contractual requirements, which may give rise to
liability, lead to the loss of trade secrets or other intellectual property, or result in public exposure of personal information of our employees, clinical trial patients, customers and others. Furthermore, negative posts or comments about us or
our products in social media could seriously damage our reputation, brand image and goodwill, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Social media companies on which we rely for advertising may change their policies limiting our ability to reach our target markets.
We rely on social media companies, such as Facebook and Twitter, to reach our target markets. Facebook has announced that beginning in January 2022 it will limit the ability of advertisers to target certain markets.
Any restrictions by Facebook or any other social media platform on which we depend to reach our target market could have a significant impact on our ability to develop customer awareness and generate new users for our physician partners.
We may become subject to claims of infringement or misappropriation of the intellectual property rights of others, which could prohibit us from shipping affected products, require us to obtain
licenses from third parties or to develop non-infringing alternatives, and subject us to substantial monetary damages and injunctive relief. Our patents may also be subject to challenge on validity grounds, and our patent applications may be
rejected.
Third parties could, in the future, assert infringement or misappropriation claims against us with respect to our current or future products. Whether a product infringes a patent involves complex legal and factual
issues, the determination of which is often uncertain. Therefore, we cannot be certain that we have not infringed the intellectual property rights of such third parties. Our potential competitors may assert that some aspect of our products
infringes their patents. There also may be existing patents of which we are unaware that one or more components of our products may inadvertently infringe.
Any infringement or misappropriation claim could cause us to incur significant costs, could place significant strain on our financial resources, divert management’s attention from our business and harm our
reputation. If the relevant patents were upheld as valid and enforceable and we were found to infringe, we could be prohibited from selling our product unless we could obtain licenses to use the technology covered by the patent or are able to
design around the patent. We may be unable to obtain a license on terms acceptable to us, if at all, and we may not be able to redesign the affected product to avoid infringement.
A court could order us to pay compensatory damages for such infringement, plus prejudgment interest and could, in addition, treble the compensatory damages and award attorney fees. These damages could be substantial
and could harm our reputation, business, financial condition and operating results. A court also could enter orders that temporarily, preliminarily or permanently enjoin us and our customers from making, using, selling, offering to sell or
importing our products, and/or could enter an order mandating that we undertake certain remedial activities. Depending on the nature of the relief ordered by the court, we could become liable for additional damages to third parties.
We rely on our patents, patent applications and other intellectual property rights to give us a competitive advantage. Whether a patent is valid, or whether a patent application should be granted, is a complex matter
of science and law. Therefore, we cannot be certain that, if challenged, our patents, patent applications and/or other intellectual property rights would be upheld. If one or more of those patents, patent applications and other intellectual
property rights are invalidated, rejected or found unenforceable, those outcomes could reduce or eliminate any competitive advantage we might otherwise have had.
If we or our third-party manufacturers or suppliers fail to comply with the FDA’s Quality System Regulation or any applicable state equivalent, our manufacturing operations could be interrupted
and our potential product sales and operating results could suffer.
We and some of our third-party manufacturers and suppliers are required to comply with some or all of the FDA’s Good Manufacturing Practices or its QSR, which delineates the design controls, document controls,
purchasing controls, identification and traceability, production and process controls, acceptance activities, nonconforming product requirements, corrective and preventive action requirements, labeling and packaging controls, handling, storage,
distribution and installation requirements, records requirements, servicing requirements, and statistical techniques potentially applicable to the production of our medical devices. We and our manufacturers and suppliers are also subject to the
regulations of foreign jurisdictions regarding the manufacturing process if we market its products overseas. The FDA enforces the QSR through periodic and announced or unannounced inspections of manufacturing facilities. Our facilities have been
inspected by the FDA and other regulatory authorities, and we anticipate that we and certain of our third-party manufacturers and suppliers will be subject to additional future inspections. If our facilities or those of our manufacturers or
suppliers are found to be in non-compliance or fail to take satisfactory corrective action in response to adverse QSR inspectional findings, FDA could take legal or regulatory enforcement actions against us and/or our products, including but not
limited to the cessation of sales or the recall of distributed products, which could impair our ability to produce our products in a cost-effective and timely manner in order to meet our customers’ demands. We may also be required to bear other
costs or take other actions that may have a negative impact on our future sales and our ability to generate profits.
Current regulations depend heavily on administrative interpretation. If the FDA does not believe that we are in substantial compliance with applicable FDA regulations, the agency could take legal or regulatory
enforcement actions against us and/or our products. We are also subject to periodic inspections by the FDA, other governmental regulatory agencies, as well as certain third-party regulatory groups. Future interpretations made by the FDA or other
regulatory bodies made during the course of these inspections may vary from current interpretations and may adversely affect our business and prospects. The FDA’s and foreign regulatory agencies’ statutes, regulations, or policies may change, and
additional government regulation or statutes may be enacted, which could increase post-approval regulatory requirements, or delay, suspend, prevent marketing of any cleared/approved products or necessitate the recall of distributed products. We
cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of adverse governmental regulation that might arise from future legislative or administrative action, either in the U.S. or abroad.
The medical device industry has been under heightened FDA scrutiny as the subject of government investigations and enforcement actions. If our operations and activities are found to be in violation of any FDA laws or
any other governmental regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines and other legal and/or agency enforcement actions. Any penalties, damages, fines, or curtailment or
restructuring of our operations or activities could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our financial results. The risk of us being found in violation of FDA laws is increased by the fact that many of these laws are broad and
their provisions are open to a variety of interpretations. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend ourselves against that action and its underlying allegations, could cause us to incur significant legal
expenses and divert management’s attention from the operation of our business. Where there is a dispute with a federal or state governmental agency that cannot be resolved to the mutual satisfaction of all relevant parties, we may determine that
the costs, both real and contingent, are not justified by the commercial returns to us from maintaining the dispute or the product.
Various claims, design features or performance characteristics of our medical devices, that we regarded as permitted by the FDA without marketing clearance or approval, may be challenged by the FDA or state
regulators. The FDA or state regulatory authorities may find that certain claims, design features or performance characteristics, in order to be made or included in the products, may have to be supported by further studies and marketing
clearances or approvals, which could be lengthy, costly and possibly unobtainable.
If we fail to comply with ongoing regulatory requirements, or if we experience unanticipated problems with products, these products could be subject to restrictions or withdrawal from the market.
We are also subject to similar state requirements and licenses. Failure by us to comply with statutes and regulations administered by the FDA and other regulatory bodies, discovery of previously unknown problems with
our products (including unanticipated adverse events or adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency), manufacturing problems, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, or failure to adequately respond to any FDA observations
concerning these issues, could result in, among other things, any of the following actions:
• |
warning letters or untitled letters issued by the FDA;
|
• |
fines, civil penalties, injunctions and criminal prosecution;
|
• |
unanticipated expenditures to address or defend such actions;
|
• |
delays in clearing or approving, or refusal to clear or approve, our products;
|
• |
withdrawal or suspension of clearance or approval of our products by the FDA or other regulatory bodies;
|
• |
product recall or seizure;
|
• |
orders for physician or customer notification or device repair, replacement or refund;
|
• |
interruption of production; and
|
• |
operating restrictions.
|
If any of these actions were to occur, it would harm our reputation and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our medical products may in the future be subject to product recalls that could harm our reputation, business and financial results.
The FDA has the authority to require the recall of commercialized medical device products in the event of material deficiencies or defects in design or manufacture. In the case of the FDA, the authority to require a
recall must be based on an FDA finding that there is a reasonable probability that the device would cause serious injury or death. Manufacturers may, under their own initiative, recall a product if any material deficiency in a device is found. A
government-mandated or voluntary recall by us or one of our distributors could occur as a result of component failures, manufacturing errors, design or labeling defects or other deficiencies and issues. Recalls of any of our products would divert
managerial and financial resources and have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. The FDA requires that certain classifications of recalls be reported to the FDA within ten working days after the recall is
initiated. Companies are required to maintain certain records of recalls, even if they are not reportable to the FDA. We may initiate voluntary recalls involving our products in the future that we determine do not require notification of the FDA.
If the FDA disagrees with our determinations, they could require us to report those actions as recalls. A future recall announcement could harm our reputation with customers and negatively affect sales. In addition, the FDA could take enforcement
action for failing to report the recalls when they were conducted.
If any of our medical products cause or contribute to a death or a serious injury, or malfunction in certain ways, we will be subject to medical device reporting regulations, which can result in
voluntary corrective actions or agency enforcement actions.
Under the FDA medical device reporting regulations, medical device manufacturers are required to report to the FDA information that a device has or may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or has
malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to death or serious injury if the malfunction of the device or one of our similar devices were to recur. If we fail to report these events to the FDA within the required timeframes, or
at all, the FDA could take enforcement action against us. Any such adverse event involving our products also could result in future voluntary corrective actions, such as recalls or customer notifications, or agency action, such as inspection or
enforcement action. Any corrective action, whether voluntary or involuntary, as well as defending ourselves in a lawsuit, will require our time and capital, distract management from operating our business, and may harm our reputation and
financial results.
We may have a need for additional funds in the future and there is no guarantee that we will be able to generate those funds from our business.
Our existing cash position and ability to borrow funds and future revenue may not be sufficient to support the expenses of our operations in the near term, although based upon our cash and cash equivalents, current
budgeting and projected cash flow models, we believe that we will be able to support our operations for at least the next 12 months following the filing of this Report. We plan to fund operations by the recurring revenue generated by the use of
the XTRAC lasers in the U.S. and international markets, as well as domestic and international sales of our products. If revenues from the sale and use of our existing products are inadequate to fund our operations, we may need to raise additional
financing. We cannot assure you that we will be able to raise additional capital or secure alternate financing to fund operations, if necessary, or that we will be able to raise additional capital under terms that are favorable to us. Further, we
cannot assure that an acquisition will in any way negate or mitigate our need for future capital. Any additional financing may dilute the ownership interest of our existing stockholders and could adversely affect the market price of our common
stock.
If we do not have enough capital to fund operations, then we will have to cut costs or raise funds.
If we are unable to raise additional funds, if necessary, under terms acceptable to us and in the interests of our stockholders, then we will have to take measures to cut operating costs or obtain funds using
alternative methods, such as:
• |
Sell or license some of our technologies that we would not otherwise sell or license if we were in a stronger financial position;
|
• |
Sell or license some of our technologies under terms that are less favorable than they otherwise might have been if we were in a stronger financial position; and
|
• |
Consider further business combination transactions with other companies or positioning ourselves to be acquired by another company.
|
If it became necessary to take one or more of the above-listed actions, then our perceived valuation may be lower, which could impact the market price of our stock. Further, the effects on our operations, financial
performance and stock price may be significant if we do not or cannot take one or more of the above-listed actions in a timely manner and when needed, and our ability to do so may be limited significantly due to the instability of the global
financial markets and the resulting limitations on available financing to us and to potential licensees, buyers and investors. Additionally, these options may not be available to us as all of our assets have been pledged as security for the
various financings.
If our actual liability for state sales and use taxes is higher than our accrued liability, it could have a material impact on our financial condition.
Included in accrued state sales and use taxes are certain known and estimated sales and use taxes and related penalties and interest to taxing authorities. In our recurring revenue model, we place the XTRAC system in
the physician’s office under an arrangement for no upfront charge and generate our revenue on a per-use basis.
In the ordinary course of business, we are, from time to time, subject to audits performed by state taxing authorities. These actions and proceedings are generally based on the state’s position that the
arrangements entered into by the Company are subject to state sales and use tax rather than exempt from applicable law. We are currently under audit by two taxing jurisdictions as it pertains to state sales and/or use tax. One jurisdiction has
assessed us, in two assessments, an aggregate amount of $1.5 million for the period from March 2014 through February 2020 including penalties and interest. We have declined an informal offer to settle at a substantially lower amount and are
currently in that jurisdiction’s administrative process of appeal. In January 2021, we received notification that the administrative judge in this jurisdiction had issued an opinion finding in favor of us that the sale of XTRAC treatment codes
were not taxable as sales tax with respect to the first assessment. The jurisdiction filed an appeal of the administrative law judge’s finding and, following the submission of legal briefs by both sides and an oral argument held in January 2022,
the appeal is still in process. The second jurisdiction has made an assessment of $0.7 million from June 2015 through March 2018 plus interest of $0.2 million through April 2020. We are in the administrative appeal process in this jurisdiction as
well and the timing has been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. In the event there is a determination that the true object of the delivery of phototherapy under the recurring revenue model is a sale or lease of property and it is not a
prescription medication or we do not have other defenses where we prevail, we may be subject to state sales taxes in those particular states for previous years and in the future, plus interest and penalties for failure to pay such taxes. If it
was determined that our recurring revenue model was not exempt from sales taxes in all states where we do business, and taxes and penalties were imposed in each of those states for the entire period through the expiration of each state’s statute
of limitations, state sales and use tax, penalties and interest for such period would have a material negative impact on our financial condition and cash flow.
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, we have estimated our sales and use tax liability to be approximately $3.7 million and $3.1 million, respectively. We believe our sales and use tax accruals have properly recognized
that if our arrangements with customers are deemed more likely than not that we would not be exempt from sales tax in a particular state are the basis for measurement of the state sales and use tax is calculated in accordance with ASC 405, Liabilities, as a transaction tax. While we believe we have strong positions that our recurring revenue is exempt from sales tax, if it is found that we are subject to sales tax in those particular states
where we believe it is more likely than not that we would be exempt from sales tax, then potential tax liabilities including interest and penalties would be higher than accrued amounts. If and when we are successful in defending ourselves or in
settling the sales tax obligation for a lesser amount, the reversal of this liability is to be recorded in the period the settlement is reached. However, the precise scope, timing and time period at issue, as well as the final outcome of any
audit and actual settlements remain uncertain.
We may be subject to disruptions or failures in our information technology systems and network infrastructures, including through cyber-attacks or other third-party breaches that could have a
material adverse effect on our business.
We rely on efficient and uninterrupted operation of complex information technology systems and network infrastructures to operate our business. We also hold data in various data center facilities upon which our
business depends. A disruption, infiltration or failure of our information technology systems or any of our data centers as a result of software or hardware malfunctions, system implementations or upgrades, computer viruses, third-party security
breaches, employee error, theft or misuse, malfeasance, power disruptions, natural disasters or accidents could cause breaches of data security, loss of intellectual property and critical data and the release and misappropriation of sensitive
competitive information.
While we have implemented a number of protective measures, including firewalls, antivirus, patches, data encryption, log monitors, routine back-ups with offsite retention of storage media, system audits, data
partitioning, routine password modifications and disaster recovery procedures, such measures may not be adequate or implemented properly to prevent or fully address the adverse effect of such events. If our systems were to fail or we are unable
to successfully expand the capacity of these systems, or we are unable to integrate new technologies into our existing systems, our operations and financial results could suffer.
We have also outsourced significant elements of our information technology infrastructure and as a result we depend on third parties who are responsible for maintaining significant elements of our information
technology systems and infrastructure and who may or could have access to our confidential information. The size and complexity of our information technology systems, and those of our third-party vendors, make such systems potentially vulnerable
to service interruptions and security breaches from inadvertent or intentional actions by its employees, partners or vendors. These systems are also vulnerable to attacks by malicious third parties, and may be susceptible to intentional or
accidental physical damage to the infrastructure maintained by us or by third parties. A breach of our security measures or the accidental loss, inadvertent disclosure, unapproved dissemination, misappropriation or misuse of trade secrets,
proprietary information, or other confidential information, whether as a result of theft, hacking, fraud, trickery or other forms of deception, or for any other cause, could enable others to produce competing products, use our proprietary
technology or information, and/or adversely affect our business. Further, any such interruption, security breach, loss or disclosure of confidential information could result in financial, legal, business, and reputational harm to us and could
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Environmental and health safety laws may result in liabilities, expenses and restrictions on our operations.
Federal, state, local and foreign laws regarding environmental protection, hazardous substances and human health and safety may adversely affect our business. Using hazardous substances in our operations exposes us
to the risk of accidental injury, contamination or other liability from the use, storage, importation, handling, or disposal of hazardous materials. If our or our suppliers’ operations result in the contamination of the environment or expose
individuals to hazardous substances, we could be liable for damages and fines, and any liability could significantly exceed our insurance coverage and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Future changes to environmental and health and safety laws could cause us to incur additional expenses or restrict our operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Risks Relating to Our Common Stock
In the event of certain contingencies, the investors in the May 2018 Equity Financing may receive additional shares issued pursuant to the Retained Risk Provisions as defined in the purchase
agreements.
In the event of certain contingencies, the investors in the May 2018 equity financing may receive additional shares issued pursuant to the Retained Risk Provisions as defined in the Stock Purchase Agreements. At the
closing, the Company determined certain contingencies had been met and, in July 2018, the Company issued 153,004 shares associated with those contingencies. There were additional contingencies included in the SPAs that expired in May 2020 and did
not result in the issuance of shares.
Our stock price may be volatile, meaning purchasers of our common stock could incur substantial losses.
Our stock price has been and is likely to continue to be volatile. The stock market in general and the market for medical technology companies in particular have experienced extreme volatility that has often been
unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. The following factors, in addition to other risk factors described in this section and general market and economic conditions, may have a significant impact on the market price of
our common stock:
• |
failure of any of our products to achieve or continue to have commercial success;
|
• |
the timing of regulatory approval for our future products;
|
• |
adverse regulatory determinations with respect to our existing products;
|
• |
results of our research and development efforts and our clinical trials;
|
• |
the announcement of new products or product enhancements by us or our competitors;
|
• |
regulatory developments in the U.S. and foreign countries;
|
• |
our ability to manufacture our products to commercial standards;
|
• |
developments concerning our clinical collaborators, suppliers or marketing partners;
|
• |
changes in financial estimates or recommendations by securities analysts;
|
• |
public concern over our products;
|
• |
developments or disputes concerning patents or other intellectual property rights;
|
• |
product liability claims and litigation against us or our competitors;
|
• |
the departure of key personnel;
|
• |
the strength of our balance sheet and any perceived need to raise additional funds;
|
• |
variations in our financial results from expected financial results or those of companies that are perceived to be similar to us;
|
• |
changes in the structure of third-party reimbursement in the U.S. and other countries;
|
• |
changes in accounting principles or practices;
|
• |
general economic, industry and market conditions; and
|
• |
future sales of our common stock.
|
A decline in the market price of our common stock could cause you to lose some or all of your investment, limit your ability to sell your shares of stock and may adversely impact our ability to attract and retain
employees and raise capital. In addition, stockholders have, and may in the future, initiate securities class action lawsuits if the market price of our stock drops significantly. Whether or not meritorious, litigation brought against us could
result in substantial costs and could divert the time and attention of our management. Our insurance to cover claims of this sort may not be adequate.
Our charter documents and Delaware law may inhibit a takeover that stockholders consider favorable and could also limit the market price of our stock.
Provisions of our restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws and applicable provisions of Delaware law may make it more difficult for or prevent a third party from acquiring control of us without the approval
of our board of directors. These provisions:
• |
limit who may call a special meeting of stockholders;
|
• |
establish advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon at stockholder meetings;
|
• |
do not permit cumulative voting in the election of our directors, which would otherwise permit less than a majority of stockholders to elect directors;
|
• |
prohibit stockholder action by written consent, thereby requiring all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our stockholders; and
|
• |
provide our board of directors the ability to designate the terms of and issue a new series of preferred stock without stockholder approval.
|
In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law generally limits our ability to engage in any business combination with certain persons who own 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock or any of
our associates or affiliates who at any time in the past three years have owned 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock. In connection with the financing in May 2018, our board of directors exempted AGP SPVI, L.P. from the application of this
provision in connection with its investment.
These provisions may have the effect of entrenching our management team and may deprive you of the opportunity to sell your shares to potential acquirers at a premium over prevailing prices. This potential inability
to obtain a control premium could reduce the price of our common stock.
Not applicable.
We lease an 8,513 sq. ft. facility in Horsham, Pennsylvania that houses our executive offices and marketing. The term of the lease runs through January 2023.
We lease a 17,000 sq. ft. facility consisting of office, manufacturing and warehousing space in Carlsbad, California. The lease was set to expire on September 30, 2019. On May 1, 2019, we entered into the Fifth
Amendment to the lease. The term of the lease commenced on October 1, 2019 and expires on September 30, 2024. Our Carlsbad facility houses the manufacturing and development operations for our excimer laser business, as well as the patient call
center and reimbursement center.
From time to time in the ordinary course of our business, we may be a party to certain legal proceedings, incidental to the normal course of our business. These may include controversies relating to contract claims
and employment related matters, some of which claims may be material, in which case, we will make separate disclosure as required.
We are currently under audit by two taxing jurisdictions, pertaining to sales and/or use tax. One jurisdiction has assessed us an amount of $1.5 million including penalties and interest, in two assessments, for the
period from March 2014 through February 2020. We have declined an informal offer to settle the first assessment at a substantially lower amount and are currently in that jurisdiction’s administrative process of appeal.
In January 2021, we received notification that the administrative law judge had issued an opinion finding in favor of us that the sale of XTRAC treatment codes are not taxable as sales tax with respect to the first
assessment. The jurisdiction filed an appeal of the administrative law judge’s finding and, following the submission of legal briefs by both sides and an oral argument held in January 2022, the appeal is in process.
A second jurisdiction has made an assessment of $0.7 million from June 2015 through March 2018 plus interest of $0.2 million through April 2020. We are in this jurisdiction’s administrative process of appeal as well
and the timing of the process has been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. If it is found we are not exempt from sales tax in these or other states then potential tax liabilities including interest and penalties would be higher than accrued
amounts.
Effective August 10, 2020, we entered into a Settlement Agreement and Release (“Settlement Agreement”) with Ra Medical Systems, Inc. (“Ra Medical”), under which the Company and Ra Medical agreed that within five
business days of final execution of the Settlement Agreement, the parties are to file stipulations and/or documentation necessary to cause each of the pending lawsuits between them and with other third-parties to be dismissed with prejudice, with
each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. The pending lawsuits were: STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. and Uri Geiger v. Ra Medical Systems, Inc., civil action no. 18-21421, Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania; and Ra
Medical Systems, Inc. v. Uri Geiger, STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc., and Accelmed Growth Partners, L.P., civil action no. 3:19-cv-00920, United States District Court for the Southern District of California.
Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, each party agreed to release the opposing parties from any and all claims, demands, and causes of action of any kind whatsoever, whether known or unknown, fixed or
contingent, asserted or unasserted, arising in contract, tort, statute, or operation of law, which they now have or ever had against any of the Ra Medical Releases, from the beginning of time to the date of the Settlement Agreement, in any way
arising from or relating to the allegations, claims, causes of action, allegations and/or assertions set forth in the pending lawsuits.
Not applicable.
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
As of March 18, 2022, we had 34,723,046 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. This did not include (i) options to purchase 3,655,709 shares of common stock, of which 1,457,858 were vested as of March 18,
2022, (ii) unissued restricted stock units of 90,540, or (iii) 373,626 shares of common stock reserved for issuance pursuant to a warrant.
DIVIDEND POLICY
We have not declared or paid any dividend on our common stock, since our inception. We do not anticipate that any dividends on our common stock will be declared or paid in the future. Any future
determination relating to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on then existing conditions, including our earnings, financial condition, results of operations, level of indebtedness,
contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects and other factors our board of directors may deem relevant. Our board of directors’ ability to declare a dividend is also subject to limits imposed by Delaware law and our credit
facility.
SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following is a summary of all of our equity compensation plans, including plans that were assumed through acquisitions and individual arrangements that provide for the issuance of equity securities as compensation,
as of December 31, 2021. See Notes 1 and 14 to the consolidated financial statements for additional discussion.
Plan Category
|
Number of
securities
to be issued
upon
exercise of
outstanding
securities
(#)
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price of
outstanding
options ($)
|
Number of
securities
remaining
available for
future
issuance
under equity
compensation
plans
(excluding
securities
reflected in
column(a))
(#)
|
|||||||||
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
|||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
3,938,613
|
$
|
1.90
|
3,932,271
|
||||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
|
3,938,613
|
$
|
1.90
|
3,932,271
|
RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES; USE OF PROCEEDS FROM REGISTERED SECURITIES
None.
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
None.
Not applicable.
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and
other financial information included in this Annual Report. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this Annual Report, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our
business, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties as described under the heading “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” elsewhere in this Annual Report. You should review the disclosure under the
heading “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion
and analysis.
Overview
STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. is a medical technology company in dermatology dedicated to developing, commercializing and marketing innovative products for the treatment of dermatologic conditions. Its products include
the XTRAC® and now Pharos® excimer lasers and VTRAC® lamp systems utilized in the treatment of psoriasis, vitiligo and various other skin conditions.
The XTRAC ultraviolet light excimer laser system is utilized to treat psoriasis, vitiligo and other skin diseases. The XTRAC excimer laser system received clearance from the United States Food and Drug Administration
in 2000 and has since become a widely recognized treatment among dermatologists. The system delivers targeted 308nm ultraviolet light to affected areas of skin, leading to psoriasis clearing and vitiligo repigmentation, following a series of
treatments. As of December 31, 2021, there were 890 XTRAC systems placed in dermatologists’ offices in the United States under our dermatology recurring procedures model, an increase from 832 at the end of December 31, 2020. Under the dermatology
recurring procedures model, the XTRAC system is placed in a physician’s office and fees are charged on a per procedure basis or a fee is charged on a periodic basis not to exceed an agreed upon number of procedures. The XTRAC system’s use for
psoriasis is covered by nearly all major insurance companies, including Medicare. The VTRAC Excimer Lamp system, offered internationally in addition to the XTRAC, provides targeted therapeutic efficacy demonstrated by excimer technology with the
simplicity of design and reliability of a lamp system. We believe there are approximately 7.5 million people in the United States and up to 125 million people worldwide suffering from psoriasis, and 1% to 2% of the world’s population suffers from
vitiligo.
In September 2020, we signed a direct distribution agreement with our Japanese distributor for a combination of direct dermatology procedures equipment sales and recurring revenue for the country of Japan. In
February 2021, we signed an agreement with our Chinese distributor for a combination of direct dermatology procedures equipment sales and recurring revenues for the country of China.
The Pharos excimer laser system holds FDA clearance to treat chronic skin diseases, including psoriasis, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis and leukoderma.
COVID-19 Pandemic
In late 2019, there was an outbreak of a new strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) which became a global pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted the global economy, disrupted global supply chains,
constrained work force participation and created significant volatility and disruption of financial markets. In addition, the pandemic led to the suspension of elective procedures in the U.S. and to the temporary closure of many physician
practices which are our primary customers. While most offices have reopened, some physician practices closed and never reopened, and the impact of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and its variants on our operational and financial performance,
including our ability to execute our business strategies and initiatives in the expected time frames, will depend on future developments, including the duration and ongoing spread of the COVID-19 outbreak and its variants, continued or renewed
restrictions on business operations and transport, any governmental and societal responses thereto, including legislative or regulatory as well as the percentage of the populace vaccinated and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and the continued
impact on worldwide economic and geopolitical conditions, all of which are uncertain and cannot be predicted.
Domestically, as the procedures in which our devices are used are elective in nature; and as social distancing, travel restrictions, quarantines and other restrictions became prevalent in the United States, this had
a negative impact on our recurring revenue model and its financial position and cash flow. The virus has disrupted the supply chains world-wide that we depend upon to provide a steady source of components to manufacture and repair our devices.
To mitigate the impact of COVID-19, we have taken a variety of measures to ensure the availability and functioning of our critical infrastructure by implementing business continuity plans to promote the safety and
security of our employees, while complying with various government mandates, including work-from-home arrangements and social-distancing initiatives to reduce the transmission of COVID-19 and complying with federal and local regulations at our
facilities. The Company implemented a policy whereby all Company employees are required to be vaccinated or complete weekly COVID-19 testing. In addition, we created and executed programs utilizing our direct to consumer advertising and call
center to contact patients and partner clinics to restart our partners’ businesses.
In the event our own employees are impacted through direct or ancillary contact with a person who has the virus, we may need to devise other methods of transacting business in our offices by working from home and or
potentially ceasing operations for a period of time. Supply chain disruptions which began during the pandemic have continued and may continue for the foreseeable future. While the Company’s operations have not been materially impacted by the
general trends in supply chain problems, the Company continues to monitor and assess potential risks.
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on our results of operations and financial performance through fiscal 2021, and we expect it will continue to have a negative impact on revenues, earnings and
cash flows until such time as the pandemic ends or the country adjusts to its ramifications. Some physician offices continue to experience staffing issues, and we believe these shortages of trained personnel have negatively impacted our business.
Accordingly, current results and financial conditions discussed herein may not be indicative of future operating results and trends.
Key Technologies
• |
XTRAC® Excimer Laser. XTRAC received FDA clearance in 2000 and has since become a widely recognized treatment among dermatologists for psoriasis and other skin
diseases. The XTRAC System delivers ultra-narrowband ultraviolet B (“UVB”) light to affected areas of skin. Following a series of treatments typically performed twice weekly, psoriasis remission can
be achieved, and vitiligo patches can be re-pigmented. XTRAC is endorsed by the National Psoriasis Foundation, and its use for psoriasis is covered by nearly all major insurance companies, including Medicare. We estimate that more than half
of all major insurance companies now offer reimbursement for vitiligo as well, a figure that is increasing.
|
• |
In the third quarter of 2018, we announced the FDA granted clearance for our Multi Micro Dose (MMD) tip for our XTRAC excimer laser. The MMD Tip accessory is indicated for use in conjunction with the XTRAC laser system to filter the
Narrow Band UVB (“NB-UVB”) light at delivery in order to calculate and individualize the maximum non-blistering dose for a particular patient.
|
• |
In January 2020, we announced the FDA granted clearance of our XTRAC Momentum Excimer Laser Platform.
|
• |
VTRAC® Lamp. VTRAC received FDA clearance in 2005 and provides targeted therapeutic efficacy demonstrated by excimer technology with the simplicity of design and
reliability of a lamp system.
|
Recent Developments
Asset Acquisitions
In August 2021 and January 2022, we acquired certain assets and certain liabilities related to the Pharos U.S. dermatology business of Ra Medical Systems, Inc. (“Ra Medical”) and TheraClear Devices from Theravant
Corporation, respectively. The Pharos asset acquisition provides us with the opportunity to market our full business solutions to Ra Medical’s existing customer base of 400 dermatology practices and increase our recurring revenue base. The Pharos
transaction also provides a highly synergistic path to gain additional placements for our XTRAC excimer laser system. The TheraClear asset acquisition will allow us to further develop, commercialize and market the TheraClear Devices that are used
for acne treatment, as well as advance the TheraClear technology into multiple other devices that can be used to treat a range of additional indications.
We made upfront cash payments of $3.7 million and $0.5 million in connection with the Pharos and TheraClear asset acquisitions, respectively. In addition, Theravant Corporation received 358,367 shares of our common
stock with an aggregate value of $0.5 million and is eligible to receive up to $3.0 million in future earnout payments upon the achievement of certain annual net revenue milestones, up to $20.0 million in future royalty payments based upon gross
profit from future domestic sales, 25% of gross profit from international sales over the subsequent four-year period, and up to $1.0 million in future milestone payments upon the achievement of certain development and related net revenue targets.
MidCap Financing
In September 2021, we entered into an $8.0 million secured borrowing facility with MidCap Financial Trust, or MidCap. The facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 7.50%, with a LIBOR floor of 0.50%, and matures on
September 1, 2026. We are obligated to make interest-only payments through September 2024. From October 2024 to maturity, we will make payments of principal and interest in 24 equal installments. The loan is senior to all other indebtedness and is
secured by substantially all of our assets. We are subject to customary affirmative and negative covenants including a financial covenant based on minimum revenue thresholds. Upon an event of default, including a covenant violation, all principal
and interest are due on demand.
Proceeds from our MidCap facility were used to repay, in their entirety, the outstanding principal and interest associated with our Economic Injury Disaster Loan. In September 2021, we also repaid our note payable with
the proceeds from the pledged time deposit held by the lender.
Equity Distribution Agreement
In October 2021, we entered into an equity distribution agreement under which we may sell up to $11.0 million of our shares of common stock in registered “at-the-market” offerings. The shares will be offered at
prevailing market prices, and we will pay commissions of up to 3.0% of the gross proceeds from the sale of shares sold through our agent, which may act as an agent and/or principal. We have no obligation to sell any shares under this agreement
and may, at any time, suspend solicitations under this agreement. No shares of our common stock have been sold under this distribution agreement during fiscal 2021.
Components of Results of Operations
Revenues
To date, we have generated revenues primarily from the placement of our lasers in physicians’ offices and the related sales and rentals and the recurring revenues from our sale of treatment sessions.
Dermatology Recurring Procedures Segment: we have primarily two types of arrangements for our phototherapy treatment equipment as follows: (i) we place our lasers in a physician’s office at no charge
to the physician, and generally charge the physician a fee for an agreed upon number of treatments; or (ii) we place our lasers in a physician’s office and charge the physician a fixed fee for a specified period of time not to exceed an agreed upon
number of treatments; if that number is exceeded additional fees will have to be paid.
Dermatology Procedures Equipment Segment: we sell our products internationally through distributors and domestically, directly to a physician. We also derive revenues from service and repair extended
warranty contracts with our existing customers.
We refer you to the section titled “—Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates—Revenue Recognition” appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding
how we account for revenues.
Sales in the United States represented 77% of our total revenues for each of the years ending December 31, 2021 and 2020, and have been generated by our direct sales force. Outside the United States, our sales are made
through third-party distributors. International revenues were 23% for each of the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. We expect that both our United States and international revenues will increase in the near term as we continue to expand our
product offerings and increase the related patient utilization in the United States, as well as grow our presence in Asia.
Cost of Revenues and Gross Margin
Cost of revenues primarily consists of the costs of components and the manufacture of our XTRAC and VTRAC systems. Cost of revenues also includes costs related to personnel, depreciation, warranty, shipping, and our
operations and field service departments.
Our gross profit is calculated by subtracting our cost of revenues from our revenues. We calculate our gross margin as our gross profit divided by our revenues. Our gross margin has been and will continue to be
affected by a variety of factors, primarily product sales mix, pricing manufacturing costs. Our gross margins on revenues from sales of dermatology procedures equipment are lower than our gross margins on revenues from sales of dermatology
recurring procedures and, as a result, the sales mix between dermatology recurring procedures and dermatology procedures equipment can affect the gross margin in any reporting period.
Engineering and Product Development
Engineering and product development expenses consist primarily of personnel expenses, including salaries and related benefits for employees in engineering, product development, regulatory and quality assurance
functions. We typically use our employee, consultant and infrastructure resources across our engineering and product development programs.
We plan to incur engineering and product development expenses for the near future as we expect to continue our development that focuses on the application of our XTRAC system for the treatment of inflammatory skin
disorders. As a result, we expect our engineering and product development expenses to remain similar to our fiscal year 2021 expenses.
Selling and Marketing
Selling and marketing expenses consist of market research and commercial activities related to the sale of our dermatology recurring procedures and dermatology procedures equipment sales, and
salaries and related benefits and sales commissions for employees focused on these efforts. Other significant sales and marketing costs include conferences and trade shows, promotional and marketing activities, including direct and online marketing
to the consumer and dermatologists, practice support programs, travel and training expenses.
We anticipate that our selling and marketing expenses will increase as we continue to execute on our growth initiatives and expand our business in the United States.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel expenses, including salaries and related benefits, share-based compensation and travel expenses, for employees in executive, finance, information
technology, legal and human resource functions. General and administrative expenses also include the cost of insurance, outside legal fees, accounting and other consulting services, audit fees from our independent registered public accounting
firm, board of directors’ fees and other administrative costs, such as corporate facility costs, including rent, utilities, depreciation and maintenance not otherwise included in cost of revenues.
We anticipate that our general and administrative expenses will increase modestly in fiscal year 2022.
Gain of Forgiveness of Debt
In fiscal 2021, we recognized a gain on forgiveness of debt associated with our Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) loan.
Interest Expense
Interest expense consists of cash interest payable under our debt facilities and non-cash interest attributable to the amortization of deferred financing costs related to our indebtedness.
Interest Income
Interest income is earned on our cash and cash equivalent account balances.
Income Taxes
As of December 31, 2021, we had federal and state NOL carryforwards of $204.3 million and $60.7 million, respectively. The net operating loss carryforwards generated prior to 2018 begin expiring in 2022 for federal and
2030 for state income tax purposes. Federal and many state net operating losses generated in 2018 and into the future now have an indefinite life.
In general, under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, a corporation that undergoes an “ownership change” is subject to limitations on its ability to utilize its NOLs to offset
future taxable income. We have not completed a study to assess whether an ownership change has occurred in the past. Our existing NOLs may be subject to limitations arising from previous ownership changes, and if we undergo an ownership change,
our ability to utilize NOLs could be further limited by Section 382 of the Code. Future changes in our stock ownership, some of which are outside of our control, could result in an ownership change under Section 382 of the Code. Our NOLs are also
subject to international regulations, which could restrict our ability to utilize our NOLs. Furthermore, our ability to utilize NOLs of companies that we may acquire in the future may be subject to limitations. There is also a risk that due to
regulatory changes, such as suspensions on the use of NOLs, or other unforeseen reasons, our existing NOLs could expire or otherwise be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities.
Results of Operations
Comparison of the Years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
(in thousands)
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
Change
|
||||||||||||||
|
2021
|
2020
|
Dollar
|
Percentage
|
||||||||||||
Revenues, net
|
$
|
29,977
|
$
|
23,090
|
$
|
6,887
|
30
|
%
|
||||||||
Cost of revenues
|
10,127
|
8,956
|
1,171
|
13
|
||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
19,850
|
14,134
|
5,716
|
40
|
||||||||||||
Operating expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
Engineering and product development
|
1,434
|
1,274
|
160
|
13
|
||||||||||||
Selling and marketing
|
13,106
|
9,038
|
4,068
|
45
|
||||||||||||
General and administrative
|
9,712
|
7,898
|
1,814
|
23
|
||||||||||||
24,252
|
18,210
|
6,042
|
33
|
|||||||||||||
Loss from operations
|
(4,402
|
)
|
(4,076
|
)
|
(326
|
)
|
8
|
|||||||||
Other income (expense):
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
(314
|
)
|
(211
|
)
|
(103
|
)
|
49
|
|||||||||
Interest income
|
15
|
150
|
(135
|
)
|
(90
|
)
|
||||||||||
Gain on forgiveness of debt
|
2,029
|
—
|
2,029
|
100
|
||||||||||||
1,730
|
(61
|
)
|
1,791
|
2,936
|
||||||||||||
Loss before income tax expense
|
$
|
(2,672
|
)
|
$
|
(4,137
|
)
|
$
|
1,465
|
35
|
%
|
Revenues
Revenues by Geography
The following tables present revenues by geography for the periods presented below:
(in thousands)
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
Change
|
||||||||||||||
|
2021
|
2020
|
Dollar
|
Percentage
|
||||||||||||
Domestic
|
$
|
23,197
|
$
|
17,804
|
$
|
5,393
|
30
|
%
|
||||||||
International
|
6,780
|
5,286
|
1,494
|
28
|
||||||||||||
Total Revenues
|
$
|
29,977
|
$
|
23,090
|
$
|
6,887
|
30
|
%
|
Revenues by Product Type
The following tables present revenues by segment for the periods presented below:
(in thousands)
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
Change
|
||||||||||||||
|
2021
|
2020
|
Dollar
|
Percentage
|
||||||||||||
Dermatology recurring
|
$
|
22,528
|
$
|
17,409
|
$
|
5,119
|
29
|
%
|
||||||||
Dermatology equipment
|
7,449
|
5,681
|
1,768
|
31
|
||||||||||||
Total Revenues
|
$
|
29,977
|
$
|
23,090
|
$
|
6,887
|
30
|
%
|
Dermatology Recurring Procedures
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on our results for 2021 and 2020, and we expect it will have a negative impact on revenue for as long as the pandemic continues. Recognized treatment revenue
for the years ended December 31, 2021, was $22.5 million, which we estimate is approximately 321,000 treatments with prices between $65 and $95 per treatment compared to recognized treatment revenue for the year ended December 31, 2020, of $17.4
million, which is approximately 249,000 treatments with prices between $65 and $95 per treatment.
Increases in procedures are dependent upon building market acceptance through marketing programs with our physician partners and their patients to show that the XTRAC procedures will be of clinical benefit and will
be generally reimbursed by insurers. We believe that several factors have an impact on the prescribed use of XTRAC treatments for psoriasis and vitiligo patients. Specifically, we believe that there is a lack of awareness of the positive effects
of XTRAC treatments among both sufferers and providers; and the treatment regimen, which can sometimes require up to 12 or more treatments, has limited XTRAC use to certain patient populations. Therefore, our strategy is to continue to execute a
direct-to-patient program for XTRAC advertising in the United States, targeting psoriasis and vitiligo patients through a variety of media and through our use of social media such as Facebook and Twitter. We monitor the results of our advertising
expenditures in this area to reach the more than 10 million patients in the United States we believe are afflicted with these diseases. During 2020, we reduced our direct to consumer advertising spend, however, as the country began to adapt to
COVID-19 and vaccines became available during 2021, we increased spending in the direct-to-patient programs to drive patients to our partner clinics to increase recurring revenue and increase spend in marketing activities as well. The increase in
spending on these programs usually precedes the recurring revenue in our past experience as there is a lag between our advertising and patients then receiving treatment, which we estimate to be three to nine months. Subject to governmental
responses to variants of COVID-19, we may curtail spending again in certain areas or redirect spending to less impacted areas. Revenues from Dermatology Recurring Procedures are recognized as revenue over the estimated usage period of the agreed
upon number of treatments, as the treatments are being used. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, we deferred net revenues of $1.9 million and $1.8 million, respectively, which will be recognized as revenue over the remaining usage period for
domestic placements. Lower deferred revenue from the fourth quarter 2020 negatively impacted the first half of 2021 as compared to the first half of 2020 when higher deferred revenue favorably impacted that period.
We have recently signed direct distribution contracts with our international distributors for a combination of direct dermatology procedures equipment sales and recurring revenue. If the recurring model is accepted
in these countries and the business model can be executed by these distributors, these agreements are expected to increase recurring revenue over time, but will have an initial impact of reducing sales of dermatology procedures equipment.
Dermatology Procedures Equipment
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on our results for 2021 and 2020, and we expect it will have a negative impact on its revenue for as long as the pandemic continues. For the year ended December
31, 2021, dermatology procedures equipment revenues were $7.5 million. Internationally, we sold 38 systems (30 XTRAC and 8 VTRAC).
For the year ended December 31, 2020, dermatology procedures equipment revenues were $5.7 million. Internationally, we sold 36 systems (14 XTRAC and 22 VTRAC). Domestically, we sold 2 XTRAC systems for the year ended
December 31, 2020.
Cost of Revenues and Gross Profit
The following tables present changes in our gross margin, by segment, for the periods presented below:
Dermatology Recurring Procedures
(in thousands)
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
Change
|
||||||||||||||
|
2021
|
2020
|
Dollar
|
Percentage
|
||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
22,528
|
$
|
17,409
|
$
|
5,119
|
29
|
%
|
||||||||
Cost of revenues
|
6,418
|
5,832
|
586
|
10
|
||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
$
|
16,110
|
$
|
11,577
|
$
|
4,533
|
39
|
%
|
||||||||
Gross profit percentage
|
72
|
%
|
67
|
%
|
The primary reasons for the increase in gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2021 were the result of higher sales, partially offset by higher depreciation expenses in 2021 and an unfavorable impact of
deferred revenue in 2021 as compared to 2020.
Dermatology Procedures Equipment
(in thousands)
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
Change
|
||||||||||||||
|
2021
|
2020
|
Dollar
|
Percentage
|
||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
7,449
|
$
|
5,681
|
$
|
1,768
|
31
|
%
|
||||||||
Cost of revenues
|
3,709
|
3,124
|
585
|
19
|
||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
$
|
3,740
|
$
|
2,557
|
$
|
1,183
|
46
|
%
|
||||||||
Gross profit percentage
|
50
|
%
|
45
|
%
|
The primary reasons for the increase in gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2021 were higher equipment sales and deferred revenue assumed in the Pharos acquisition.
Engineering and Product Development
For the year ended December 31, 2021, engineering and product development expenses were $1.4 million as compared to $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. Engineering and product development costs during
the year ended December 31, 2021 were higher primarily as a result of consulting costs associated with certain development projects.
Selling and Marketing
As of December 31, 2021, our sales and marketing personnel consisted of 63 full-time positions, inclusive of a vice president of sales and a vice president of marketing, direct sales organization as well as an in-house
call center staffed with patient advocates and a reimbursement group that provides necessary insurance information to our physician partners and their patients.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, sales and marketing expenses were $13.1 million as compared to $9.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. Sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31,
2021 were higher, as compared to the same period in 2020, as we made investments in sales and marketing and direct to consumer advertising, while in 2020 we managed our costs due to the downturn in business as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic,
with lower tradeshow costs, compensation costs, commissions, travel and direct-to-consumer advertising costs.
General and Administrative
For the year ended December 31, 2021, general and administrative expenses increased to $9.7 million from $7.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. General and administrative expenses were higher for the year
ended December 31, 2021, as compared to the same period in 2020. The increase is primarily due to higher compensation, severance and recruiting expenses as a result of the CEO transition in the first quarter of 2021, in addition to an increase in
XTRAC usage that has led to an increase in sales tax expense.
Gain on Forgiveness of Debt
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we received notification our PPP loan had been forgiven and we recorded a gain on forgiveness of debt of $2.0 million.
Interest Expense
Interest expense is primarily attributable to our debt obligations.
Interest Income
Interest income relates to the interest we receive on our cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash held with financial institutions.
Income Tax Expense
We recognized an income tax expense of $34 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, all of which were comprised primarily of changes in deferred
tax liability related to goodwill.
Non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA
We have determined to supplement our consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), presented elsewhere within
this report, with certain non-GAAP measures of financial performance. These non-GAAP measures include non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA, “Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization.”
This non-GAAP disclosure has limitations as an analytical tool, should not be viewed as a substitute for Net Earnings (Loss) determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and should not be considered in isolation or as a
substitute for analysis of the Company’s results as reported under U.S. GAAP, nor is it necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other companies. We consider these non-GAAP measures in addition to our
results prepared under current accounting standards, but they are not a substitute for, nor superior to, U.S. GAAP measures. These non-GAAP measures are provided to enhance readers’ overall understanding of our current financial performance and
to provide further information for comparative purposes. This supplemental presentation should not be construed as an inference that the Company’s future results will be unaffected by similar adjustments to Net Earnings (Loss) determined in
accordance with U.S. GAAP. Specifically, we believe the non-GAAP measures provide useful information to management and investors by isolating certain expenses, gains and losses that may not be indicative of our core operating results and business
outlook. In addition, we believe non-GAAP measures enhance the comparability of results against prior periods.
Reconciliation to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure of all non-GAAP measures included in this report is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||
(in thousands)
|
2021
|
2020
|
||||||
Net loss
|
$
|
(2,706
|
)
|
$
|
(4,412
|
)
|
||
Adjustments:
|
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
3,736
|
3,585
|
||||||
Amortization of right-of-use asset
|
350
|
326
|
||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
|
140
|
24
|
||||||
Income taxes
|
34
|
275
|
||||||
Gain on forgiveness of debt
|
(2,029
|
)
|
—
|
|||||
Interest income
|
(15
|
)
|
(150
|
)
|
||||
Interest expense
|
314
|
211
|
||||||
Non-GAAP EBITDA
|
(176
|
)
|
(141
|
)
|
||||
Stock-based compensation
|
1,643
|
1,633
|
||||||
Non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA
|
$
|
1,467
|
$
|
1,492
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
In September 2021, we entered into an $8.0 million secured borrowing facility with MidCap Financial Trust, or MidCap. The facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 7.50% with a LIBOR floor of 0.50%, and matures on
September 1, 2026. We are obligated to make interest-only payments through September 2024. From October 2024 to Maturity, we will make principal payments in 24 equal installments. The loan is senior to all other indebtedness and is secured by
substantially all of our assets. We are subject to customary affirmative and negative covenants including a financial covenant based on minimum revenue thresholds. Upon an event of default, including a covenant violation, all principal and interest
are due on demand.
Proceeds from our MidCap facility were used to repay, in their entirety, the outstanding principal and interest associated with our Economic Injury Disaster Loan. In September 2021, we also repaid our note payable with
the proceeds from the pledged time deposit held by the lender.
As of December 31, 2021, we had cash and cash equivalents of $12.6 million and an accumulated deficit of $221.7 million. We received cash flows from operating activities of $1.5 million and $2.1 million for the years
ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. We have historically incurred operating losses, and we anticipate that our operating losses will continue in the near term as we seek to expand our sales and marketing initiatives to support our
growth in existing and new markets, invest funds in additional engineering and product development activities and utilize cash for other corporate purposes. Our primary sources of capital have been from borrowings under our debt facilities and
sales of our products. As of December 31, 2021, we had $8.0 million of borrowings outstanding under our debt facility with MidCap, which has a final maturity in September 2026.
In October 2021, we entered into an equity distribution agreement under which we may sell up to $11.0 million of our shares of common stock in registered “at-the-market” offerings. The shares will be offered at
prevailing market prices, and we will pay commissions of up to 3.0% of the gross proceeds from the sale of shares sold through our agent, which may act as an agent and/or principal. We have no obligation to sell any shares under this agreement
and may, at any time, suspend solicitations under this agreement. No shares of our common stock have been sold under this distribution agreement during fiscal 2021.
We cannot predict our revenues and expenses in the short term as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and related governmental responses. Based on our current business plan, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents
as of December 31, 2021 and anticipated revenues from sales of our products will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements for at least 12 months from the date of issuance of the Annual Report. However, if these sources are insufficient to
satisfy our liquidity requirements, we may seek to sell additional debt or equity securities or enter into a new credit facility or another form of third-party funding or seek other debt financing. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity
or equity-linked securities, our stockholders would experience dilution and any new equity securities could have rights, preferences and privileges superior to those of holders of our common stock. Debt financing, if available, may involve
covenants restricting our operations or our ability to incur additional debt. We cannot be assured that additional equity, equity-linked or debt financing will be available on terms favorable to us or our stockholders, or at all. It is also
possible that we may allocate significant amounts of capital towards products or technologies for which market demand is lower than expected and, as a result, abandon such efforts. If we are unable to maintain our current financing or obtain
adequate additional financing when we require it, or if we obtain financing on terms which are not favorable to us, or if we expend capital on products or technologies that are unsuccessful, our ability to continue to support our business growth
and to respond to business challenges could be significantly limited, or we may be required to delay the development, commercialization and marketing of our products.
The following table summarizes our sources and uses of cash for each of the periods presented:
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||||||
(in thousands)
|
2021
|
2020
|
||||||
Cash provided by (used in)
|
||||||||
Operating activities
|
$
|
1,508
|
$
|
2,096
|
||||
Investing activities
|
(7,126
|
)
|
(2,159
|
)
|
||||
Financing activities
|
92
|
2,546
|
||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
|
$
|
(5,526
|
)
|
$
|
2,483
|
Operating Activities
Net cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash provided by operating activities was $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash provided by operating
activities of $2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The decrease in cash flows provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2021 was the result of a decrease in deferred taxes of $0.2 million and a decrease in the
source of cash from net assets of $0.3 million primarily attributable to COVID-19 and its impact on billings and delayed vendor payments.
Investing Activities
Net cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash used in investing activities was $7.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash used in investing activities of
$2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase is the result of the asset purchase of Ra Medical ($3.5 million) and higher costs of lasers placed into service in 2021 versus 2020 ($1.5 million).
Financing Activities
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we received proceeds of $8.0 million from our senior term facility with MidCap, offset by debt repayments of $7.8 million associated with our note payable and EIDL Loan. For the
year ended December 31, 2020, we received $2.5 million in proceeds from borrowings under our PPP Loan and EIDL Loan.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following summarizes our significant contractual obligations as of December 31, 2021:
|
Payments due by period
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands)
|
Total
|
Less than
1 year |
1-3 years
|
4-5 years
|
More than
5 years |
|||||||||||||||
Debt obligations (excluding interest)
|
$
|
8,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
1,000
|
$
|
7,000
|
$
|
—
|
||||||||||
Operating lease obligations (1)
|
799
|
371
|
428
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
8,799
|
$
|
371
|
$
|
1,428
|
$
|
7,000
|
$
|
—
|
(1) Reflects obligations related to our leased executive offices in Horsham, PA and our leased manufacturing and warehouse space in Carlsbad, CA.
Impact of Inflation
We have not operated in a highly inflationary period, and we do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our revenues or expenses. If we enter an inflationary period, it could have a material impact on
our expenses.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, and the rules and regulations of the SEC requires us to make estimates
and assumptions, based on judgments considered reasonable, which affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. We base our estimates and assumptions on historical experience, known trends and events and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the
basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Although we believe our estimates and assumptions are reasonable when made, they are based upon information available to
us at the time they are made. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis and, if necessary, make adjustments. Due to the risks and uncertainties involved in our business and evolving market conditions and given the subjective
element of the estimates and assumptions made, actual results may differ from estimated results.
We define our critical accounting policies as those accounting policies that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require our most difficult and subjective
judgments. While our significant accounting policies are more fully described in “Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in our audited financial statements and related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form
10-K, we believe the following discussion addresses our most critical accounting policies.
Revenue Recognition
We have primarily two types of arrangements for our phototherapy treatment equipment from which we earn revenues from dermatology recurring procedures: (i) we place our lasers in a physician’s office at no charge to
the physician, and generally charge the physician a fee for an agreed upon number of treatments; or (ii) we place our lasers in a physician’s office and charge the physician a fixed fee for a specified period of time not to exceed an agreed upon
number of treatments; if that number is exceeded additional fees will have to be paid. Revenues attributable to these types of arrangements are accounted for under the guidance applicable to leases. These arrangements are similar to operating
leases since we provide the customers limited arrangement rights to use the treatment equipment, the treatment equipment resides in the physician’s office and we may exercise the right to remove the equipment upon notice, under certain
circumstances, while the physician controls the utility and output of such equipment during the term of the arrangement as it pertains to the use of access codes to treat the patients. For the first type of arrangement, sales of access codes are
considered variable treatment code payments and are recognized as revenue over the estimated usage period of the agreed upon number of treatments. For the second type of arrangement, customers purchase access codes and revenue is recognized on a
straight-line basis as the lasers are being used over the term specified in the agreement. Variable treatment code payments that will be paid only if the customer exceeds the agreed upon number of treatments are recognized only when such
treatments are being exceeded and used.
We recognize revenue from dermatology procedures equipment sales when control of the promised good or service is transferred to our customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which we expect to be
entitled in exchange for those good or services. Accordingly, we determine revenue recognition by applying the following steps:
• |
identification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer;
|
• |
identification of the performance obligations in the contract;
|
• |
determination of the transaction price;
|
• |
allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and
|
• |
recognition of revenues when, or as, we satisfy a performance obligation.
|
A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied, which is generally the point in time when the product is
shipped or control is transferred for our dermatology procedures equipment sales. We sell to physicians in the United States and to third-party distributors outside the United States and do not provide return rights. Sales to distributors outside
the United States are made in U.S. dollars. In addition, we provide a one to two-year warranty for systems sold in the United States. Terms of the of the product warranty differ amongst our third-party distributors outside the United States but
are generally two years. These assurance-type warranties are not considered a separate performance obligation. We provide for the estimated cost to repair or replace products under any warranty at the time of sale. We also earn revenue from
customers from services outside of their warranty term or annual service contracts. Revenue from these service-type warranties is recognized as the services are provided.
Asset Acquisitions
Accounting for transactions as asset acquisitions is significantly different than business combinations. Goodwill is only recognized in business combination transactions. The fair value of contingent consideration is
recognized in business combination transactions and may be recognized in asset acquisitions if payment is probable and the amount can be estimated. As a result, it is important to determine whether a business or an asset or a group of assets is
acquired. A business is defined in ASC 805, Business Combinations, as an integrated set of inputs and processes that are capable of generating outputs that have the ability to provide a return to its
investors or owners. Typical inputs include long-lived assets (including intangible assets or rights to use long-lived assets), intellectual property and the ability to obtain access to required resources. Typical processes include strategic,
operational and resource management processes that are typically documented or evident through an organized workforce.
When substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets, the acquired set is not a business. We considered all of the
above factors when determining whether a business was acquired. In evaluating our acquisition of Pharos in 2021, we concluded that the fair value of consideration given to Ra Medical was concentrated in the acquired customer list intangible. As
such, we accounted for the transaction as an asset acquisition. The fair value was allocated to the acquired intangible and is being amortized over its estimated useful life.
Goodwill and Intangible Impairments
As of December 31, 2021, we had $8.8 million of goodwill related to the acquisitions of XTRAC and VTRAC businesses in fiscal 2015. We evaluate the carrying value of goodwill during the fourth quarter of each year and
whenever circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. The determination of the fair value of the reporting units to which the goodwill relates requires management to make estimates and assumptions. We organized our
business into two operating segments, which also serve as our goodwill reporting units and are defined as Dermatology Recurring Procedures and Dermatology Procedures Equipment. Our analysis employed the use of both a market and income approach,
with the market approach given a 25% weighting and the income approach given a 75% weighting. Significant assumptions used in the income approach include growth and discount rates, profit margins and our weighted average cost of capital. We used
historical performance and management estimates of future performance to determine profit margins and growth rates. Discount rates selected for each reporting unit varied. Our weighted average cost of capital included a review and assessment of
market and capital structure assumptions. For both reporting units the fair value was in excess of the carrying value. Considerable management judgment is necessary to evaluate the impact of operating changes and to estimate future cash flows.
Changes in our actual results and/or estimates or any of our other assumptions used in our analysis could result in a different conclusion.
All of our intangibles are definite lived assets, with amortization recorded over the estimated useful life on a straight-line basis. As of December 31, 2021 we had $10.1 million of intangible assets. The definite
lived assets are tested for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset group may not be recoverable. Our intangible assets are grouped into five categories: core technology, product technology,
customer relationships, trade names and Pharos customer lists. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset group to the undiscounted cash flows attributable to the asset group. If the
carrying amount of an asset group exceeds its undiscounted cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds its fair value of the asset group.
Considerable management judgment is necessary to assess recoverable amounts of intangible assets and measure fair value of the intangible assets that were impaired as such measurements involve
estimation of future revenues, royalty rates, profit margins and other cash flows. Changes in our actual results and/or estimates or any of our other assumptions used in our analysis could result in a different conclusion.
Sales and Use Taxes
We record state sales tax collected and remitted for our customers on dermatology procedures equipment sales on a net
basis, excluded from revenue. Our sales tax expense that is not presently being collected and remitted for the recurring revenue business is recorded in general and administrative expenses within the consolidated statements of operations.
We believe that our state sales and use tax
accruals have been properly recognized such that, if our arrangements with customers are deemed more likely than not that we would not be exempt from sales tax in a particular state, the basis for measurement of the state sales and use tax is
calculated in accordance with ASC 405, Liabilities, as a
transaction tax. If and when we are successful in defending ourselves or in settling the sales tax obligation for a lesser amount, the reversal of this liability is to be recorded in the period the settlement is reached. However, the precise
scope, timing and time period at issue, as well as the final outcome of any audit and actual settlement, remains uncertain.
In the ordinary course of business, we are, from time to time, subject to audits performed by state taxing
authorities. These actions and proceedings are generally based on the position that the arrangements into which we have entered are subject to sales and use tax rather than exempt from tax under applicable law. Several states have assessed us
an aggregate of $2.4 million including penalties and interest for the period from March 2014 through April 2020. We received notification that an administrative state judge issued an opinion finding in our favor that the sale of XTRAC treatment
codes was not taxable as sales tax with respect to that state’s first assessment. This ruling covers $1.5 million of the total $2.4 million of assessments. The jurisdiction filed an appeal of the administrative law judge’s finding and,
following the submission of legal briefs by both sides and oral argument held in January 2022, the appeal is still in process.
We are also in another jurisdiction’s administrative process of appeal with respect to the remaining $0.9 million of
assessments, and the timing of the process has been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. If there is a determination that the true object of our recurring revenue model is not exempt from sales taxes and is not a prescription medicine, or we do not
have other defenses where we prevail, we may be subject to sales taxes in those particular states for previous years and in the future, plus potential interest and penalties.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
A description of recently issued accounting pronouncements that may potentially impact our financial position and results of operations is disclosed in Note 2 to our audited financial statements appearing elsewhere in
this Annual Report.
We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.
The financial statements required by this Item 8 are included in this Report and begin on page F-1.
None.
Limitations of Internal Control System
Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, no evaluation of internal control over financial reporting can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not
occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation
and presentation. Management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures, (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), as of December 31, 2021. Based on that evaluation, management has concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized,
and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute,
assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit
relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design
will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our management conducted an
assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework established in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, our management has determined that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
December 31, 2021.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting in our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
None.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
Our Board has adopted a written Code of Conduct applicable to all officers, directors and employees, which is available on our website (www.strataskinsciences.com) under “Corporate Governance” within the “Investors”
section. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of this Code of Conduct by posting such information on the website address and location specified above.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
(a)(1) Financial Statements
Consolidated balance sheets of STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each
of the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
None, as all information required in these schedules is included in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(a)(3) Exhibits
The exhibits listed under subsection (b) of this Item 15 are hereby incorporated by reference.
(b) Exhibits
3.1
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
4.4
|
||
4.5
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
|
4.13
|
|
|
4.14*
|
|
|
4.15*
|
|
|
4.16
|
||
10.1*
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
10.13
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Intentionally Omitted
|
10.19
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Intentionally omitted.
|
10.24
|
|
|
10.25*
|
|
|
10.26*
|
|
|
10.27*
|
|
|
10.28*
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
10.34
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
|
10.37
|
|
|
10.38
|
|
|
10.39
|
|
|
10.40*
|
|
|
10.41*
|
|
|
10.42
|
|
|
10.43
|
|
|
10.44*
|
|
|
10.45*
|
|
|
10.46*
|
|
|
10.50*
|
|
|
10.51
|
|
|
10.52
|
|
|
10.53
|
10.54
|
|
|
10.55
|
|
|
10.56
|
|
|
10.57
|
|
|
10.58
|
|
|
10.59
|
|
|
10.60*
|
|
|
10.61
|
|
|
10.62*
|
|
|
10.63*
|
|
|
10.64
|
|
|
10.65
|
|
|
10.66
|
|
|
10.67
|
||
10.68
|
||
10.69
|
||
10.70
|
||
10.71
|
||
10.72
|
||
10.73
|
||
10.74
|
||
10.75
|
10.76
|
||
10.77
|
||
10.78*
|
||
10.79
|
||
10.80
|
||
10.81
|
||
10.82
|
||
10.83
|
||
10.84
|
||
10.85
|
||
10.86
|
||
23.1
|
||
31.1
|
||
31.2
|
||
32.1**
|
*
|
Indicates management contract or compensatory plan
|
** |
The certifications attached as Exhibit 32.1 accompany this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the
Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: March 21, 2022
|
By:
|
/s/ Robert J. Moccia
|
|
|
Robert J. Moccia
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director
(principal executive officer) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on
the dates indicated:
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert J. Moccia
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer,
|
|
March 21, 2022
|
Robert J. Moccia
|
|
and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Christopher Lesovitz
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
March 21, 2022
|
Christopher Lesovitz
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer and Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William D. Humphries
|
|
Director and Chairperson of the Board of Directors
|
|
March 21, 2022
|
William D. Humphries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Uri Geiger
|
|
Director
|
|
March 21, 2022
|
Uri Geiger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Samuel Rubinstein
|
|
Director
|
|
March 21, 2022
|
Samuel Rubinstein
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Nachum Shamir
|
|
Director
|
|
March 21, 2022
|
Nachum Shamir
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Douglas Strang
|
|
Director
|
|
March 21, 2022
|
Douglas Strang
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Patricia Walker
|
Director | March 21, 2022 | ||
Patricia Walker |
62
STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
Page
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID # )
|
|
F-2
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
F-8
|
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. and Subsidiary (the “Company”) as of December 31,
2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial
statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years
in the period ended December 31, 2021, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s
financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the
U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As
part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due
to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be
communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit
matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or
disclosures to which they relate.
Sales and Use Tax Liabilities:
As discussed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company recognizes sales tax liabilities, including interest and penalties, for its domestic recurring
revenue in those states which management determines are more-likely-than-not (“MLTN”) non-exempt from sales tax. Such amounts are accounted for as transaction tax liabilities that are extinguished upon payment or settlement. The Company recognizes
use tax liabilities, including interest and penalties, for those states that management determines are MLTN to be exempt from sales tax obligations. The Company’s sales tax expense that is not presently being collected and remitted for its domestic
recurring revenue are recorded as general and administrative expenses. The Company is currently undergoing sales tax audits in two state jurisdictions which are each in the administrative process of appeal.
We identified the accounting for sales and use tax liabilities as a critical audit matter due to the audit effort relating to the following:
•
|
The Company utilized specialists in prior years to assist in determining MLTN conclusions, and such analysis has been updated in the current year by management and
counsel.
|
•
|
Complexity in the interpretation of relevant tax laws in various states requires significant management and auditor judgment.
|
•
|
The extent of specialized skill and knowledge and consultation outside of the engagement team required to assess the appropriateness of management’s
determinations.
|
Our principal audit procedures related to the Company’s accounting for sales and use tax liabilities included the following:
•
|
We evaluated management’s significant accounting policies related to accounting for sales and use tax liabilities for reasonableness.
|
•
|
We involved our firm’s tax professionals and subject-matter-experts, with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in assessing the Company’s interpretation
of the relevant tax laws.
|
•
|
We inspected correspondence and determinations from relevant state taxing authorities for those states undergoing sales tax audits.
|
•
|
We tested the underlying data of management’s calculations and analyzed the expiration of statutes of limitations and tax rates.
|
Goodwill:
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net
tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level. Management bypassed the qualitative impairment assessment (step
zero) and performed a quantitative impairment assessment. The Company used a combination of the market and income approaches to determine the estimated fair value of its reporting units as of December 31, 2021.
We identified the annual goodwill impairment test as a critical audit matter due to the audit effort relating to the following:
•
|
The determination of the fair value of the reporting unit requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions related to forecasted revenue growth
rates, estimated expenses and discount rates. Such estimates and assumptions were challenging to test as they required forward looking assumptions with a high degree of subjectivity.
|
•
|
The extent of specialized skill and knowledge and consultation outside of the engagement team required to assess the appropriateness of management’s valuation
assumptions.
|
Our principal audit procedures related to the Company’s goodwill impairment test included the following:
•
|
We evaluated management’s significant accounting policies related to goodwill impairment for reasonableness.
|
•
|
We obtained an understanding and evaluated the reasonableness of management’s forecasts of future revenue and estimated expenses by comparing these forecasts to
historical operating results of the Company by applying procedures to test the financial inputs used in the income approach, including sensitizing management’s cash flow forecasts.
|
•
|
We involved our firm’s valuation professionals, with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in assessing assumptions utilized under the income and market
approaches. Such assumptions that were evaluated included the discount rate, selected comparable companies, market multiples, control premium and market capitalization reconciliation.
|
Intangible asset acquisition:
As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, in August 2021, the Company
acquired certain assets and liabilities related to the U.S. dermatology Pharos business from Ra Medical Systems, Inc. (“Ra Medical”). The purchase price of
$3.7 million was paid in cash at the time of acquisition. In addition, the Company assumed certain extended warranty service contracts associated with acquired laser system products. The Company determined this transaction represented an asset
acquisition as substantially all of the value was in the acquired customer list intangible asset as defined by ASC 805, Business
Combinations (“ASC 805”).
We identified the valuation of the acquired intangible asset as a critical audit matter due to the audit effort relating to the following:
•
|
The determination of the fair value of the intangible asset requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions related to forecasted revenue
growth rates, estimated expenses and discount rates. Such estimates and assumptions were challenging to test as they required forward looking assumptions with a high degree of subjectivity.
|
•
|
The extent of specialized skill and knowledge and consultation outside of the engagement team required to assess the appropriateness of management’s valuation
assumptions.
|
Our principal audit procedures related to the Company’s valuation of the acquired intangible asset included the following:
•
|
We evaluated management’s determinations of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and the consideration paid under the asset purchase agreement for
reasonableness.
|
•
|
We evaluated management’s significant accounting policies related to accounting for asset acquisitions and intangible assets for reasonableness.
|
•
|
We obtained an understanding and evaluated the reasonableness of management’s forecasts of future revenue and estimated expenses by applying procedures to
test the financial inputs used in the income approach, including sensitizing management’s cash flow forecasts.
|
•
|
We involved our firm’s valuation professionals, with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in assessing assumptions utilized under the income
approach. Such assumptions that were evaluated included the appropriateness of valuation model used, discount rate, selected comparable companies, and customer attrition rate.
|
•
|
We tested the existence, completeness and valuation of the tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, to assess the consideration paid
reconciliation.
|
/s/ Marcum LLP
Marcum LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2019.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 21, 2022
STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. and Subsidiary
(in thousands except share and per share data)
December 31, |
||||||||
2021 |
2020
|
|||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Current assets:
|
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
12,586
|
$
|
10,604
|
||||
Restricted cash
|
—
|
7,508
|
||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $275 and $274 at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively
|
3,433
|
2,944
|
||||||
Inventories
|
3,489
|
3,444
|
||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
462
|
331
|
||||||
Total current assets
|
19,970
|
24,831
|
||||||
Property and equipment, net
|
6,883
|
5,529
|
||||||
Operating lease right-of-use assets
|
638
|
988
|
||||||
Intangible assets, net
|
10,083
|
6,345
|
||||||
Goodwill
|
8,803
|
8,803
|
||||||
Other assets
|
216
|
282
|
||||||
Total assets
|
$
|
46,593
|
$
|
46,778
|
||||
|
||||||||
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
||||||||
Current liabilities:
|
||||||||
Note payable
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
7,275
|
||||
Current portion of long-term debt
|
—
|
1,478
|
||||||
Accounts payable
|
2,822
|
2,764
|
||||||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
6,377
|
4,690
|
||||||
Deferred revenues
|
3,285
|
2,262
|
||||||
Current portion of operating lease liabilities
|
318
|
369
|
||||||
Total current liabilities
|
12,802
|
18,838
|
||||||
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
7,319
|
1,050
|
||||||
Deferred revenues and other liabilities
|
400
|
34
|
||||||
Deferred tax liability
|
266
|
254
|
||||||
Operating lease liability, net of current portion
|
392
|
710
|
||||||
Total liabilities
|
21,179
|
20,886
|
||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
|
||||||||
Stockholders’ equity:
|
||||||||
Series C convertible preferred stock, $0.10 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, no
shares issued and outstanding
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 34,364,679
and 33,801,045 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively
|
34
|
34
|
||||||
Additional paid-in capital
|
247,059
|
244,831
|
||||||
Accumulated deficit
|
(221,679
|
)
|
(218,973
|
)
|
||||
Total stockholders’ equity
|
25,414
|
25,892
|
||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
46,593
|
$
|
46,778
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. and Subsidiary
(in thousands except share and per share data)
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||
2021
|
2020
|
|||||||
Revenues, net
|
$
|
29,977
|
$
|
23,090
|
||||
Cost of revenues
|
10,127
|
8,956
|
||||||
Gross profit
|
19,850
|
14,134
|
||||||
Operating expenses:
|
||||||||
Engineering and product development
|
1,434
|
1,274
|
||||||
Selling and marketing
|
13,106
|
9,038
|
||||||
General and administrative
|
9,712
|
7,898
|
||||||
|
24,252
|
18,210
|
||||||
Loss from operations
|
(4,402
|
)
|
(4,076
|
)
|
||||
Other income (expense):
|
||||||||
Interest expense
|
(314
|
)
|
(211
|
)
|
||||
Interest income
|
15 | 150 | ||||||
Gain on forgiveness of debt
|
2,029
|
—
|
||||||
|
1,730
|
(61
|
)
|
|||||
Loss before income tax expense
|
(2,672
|
)
|
(4,137
|
)
|
||||
Income tax expense
|
(34
|
)
|
(275
|
)
|
||||
Net loss
|
$
|
(2,706
|
)
|
$
|
(4,412
|
)
|
||
Net loss attributable to common shares
|
$ | (2,706 | ) | $ | (4,394 | ) | ||
Net loss attributable to Preferred Series C shares
|
$ | — | $ | (18 | ) | |||
Net loss per share of common stock, basic and diluted
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
||
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding, basic and diluted
|
34,050,274
|
33,609,922
|
||||||
Net loss per share of Preferred Series C stock, basic and diluted
|
$ | — | $ | (48.59 | ) | |||
Weighted average shares of Preferred Series C stock outstanding, basic and diluted
|
— | 368 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. and Subsidiary
(in thousands except share data)
Series C
Convertible
Preferred Stock
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Additional Paid-
in Capital
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2020
|
2,103
|
$
|
1
|
32,932,273
|
$
|
33
|
$
|
243,180
|
$
|
(214,561
|
)
|
$
|
28,653
|
|||||||||||||||
Conversion of Series C convertible preferred stock into common stock
|
(2,103
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
782,089
|
1
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
1,633
|
—
|
1,633
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options
|
—
|
—
|
15,000
|
—
|
18
|
—
|
18
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock
|
—
|
—
|
71,683
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(4,412
|
)
|
(4,412
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2020
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
33,801,045
|
$
|
34
|
$
|
244,831
|
$
|
(218,973
|
)
|
$
|
25,892
|
|||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
1,643
|
—
|
1,643
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options
|
—
|
—
|
329,076
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock
|
—
|
—
|
234,558
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock warrants in connection with Senior Term Facility
|
— | — | — | — |
585 | — | 585 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(2,706
|
)
|
(2,706
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2021
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
34,364,679
|
$
|
34
|
$
|
247,059
|
$
|
(221,679
|
)
|
$
|
25,414
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. and Subsidiary
(in thousands)
Year Ended
December 31,
|
||||||||
2021
|
2020
|
|||||||
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net loss
|
$
|
(2,706
|
)
|
$
|
(4,412
|
)
|
||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
3,736
|
3,585
|
||||||
Amortization of right-of-use assets
|
350
|
326
|
||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount
|
37 | — | ||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
1
|
90
|
||||||
Stock-based compensation
|
1,643
|
1,633
|
||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
|
140 | 24 | ||||||
Gain on forgiveness of debt
|
(2,029 | ) | — | |||||
Deferred taxes
|
12
|
254
|
||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts receivable
|
(490
|
)
|
1,352
|
|||||
Inventories
|
(45
|
)
|
(417
|
)
|
||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
(65
|
)
|
247
|
|||||
Accounts payable
|
58
|
884
|
||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
1,679
|
(588
|
)
|
|||||
Deferred revenues
|
(444
|
)
|
(570
|
)
|
||||
Operating lease liabilities
|
(369
|
)
|
(312
|
)
|
||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
1,508
|
2,096
|
||||||
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Cash paid in connection with asset acquisition
|
(3,473
|
)
|
—
|
|||||
Purchase of property and equipment
|
(3,653
|
)
|
(2,159
|
)
|
||||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(7,126
|
)
|
(2,159
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
—
|
18
|
||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt
|
8,000
|
2,528
|
||||||
Payment of deferred financing costs
|
(133 | ) | — | |||||
Repayment of note payable
|
(7,275
|
)
|
—
|
|||||
Repayment of long-term debt
|
(500 | ) | — | |||||
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
92
|
2,546
|
||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
|
(5,526
|
)
|
2,483
|
|||||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year
|
18,112
|
15,629
|
||||||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year
|
$
|
12,586
|
$
|
18,112
|
||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash paid during the year for interest
|
$
|
222
|
$
|
211
|
||||
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
||||||||
Issuance of common stock warrants in connection with Senior Term Facility
|
$
|
585
|
$
|
—
|
||||
Assumed deferred revenues in connection with asset acquisition
|
$ | 1,841 | $ | — |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
1. Organization and Nature of Business
STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”) is a medical technology company in dermatology dedicated to developing,
commercializing and marketing innovative products for the treatment of dermatologic conditions. Its products include the XTRAC® and Pharos® excimer lasers and VTRAC® lamp systems utilized in the treatment of psoriasis, vitiligo and various other
skin conditions. In January 2022, the Company acquired the TheraClear acne treatment device to broaden its opportunities with expansion potential into the acne care market.
COVID-19 Pandemic
In late 2019, there was an
outbreak of a new strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) which became a global pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted the global economy, disrupted global supply chains, constrained work force participation and created significant
volatility and disruption of financial markets. In addition, the pandemic led to the suspension of elective procedures in the U.S. and to the temporary closure of many physician practices which are the Company’s primary customers. While most
offices reopened, some physician practices closed and never reopened, and the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and its variants on the Company’s operational and financial performance, including its ability to execute its business
strategies and initiatives in the expected time frames will depend on future developments, including the duration and ongoing spread of the COVID-19 outbreak and its variants, continued or renewed restrictions on business operations and
transport, any governmental and societal responses thereto, including legislative or regulatory changes as well as the percentage of the populace vaccinated and the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and the continued impact on worldwide economic
and geopolitical conditions, all of which are uncertain and cannot be predicted.
Domestically, as the
procedures for which the Company’s devices are used are elective in nature; and as social distancing, travel restrictions, quarantines and other restrictions became prevalent in the United States, this had a negative impact on the Company’s
recurring revenue model and its financial position and cash flow. The virus has disrupted the supply chains world-wide which the Company depends upon to provide a steady source of components to manufacture and repair the Company’s devices. To
mitigate the impact of COVID-19 the Company took a variety of measures to ensure the availability and functioning of its critical infrastructure by implementing business continuity plans. To promote the safety and security of its employees, while
complying with various government mandates including work-from-home arrangements and social-distancing initiatives to reduce the transmission of COVID-19, the Company is complying with federal and local regulations at its facilities. In addition,
the Company created and executed programs utilizing its direct to consumer advertising and call center to contact patients and partner clinics to restart the Company’s partners’ businesses. In October 2021, the Company implemented a policy
whereby all Company employees are required to be vaccinated or complete weekly COVID-19 testing. To conserve its cash in order to mitigate the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, in the second quarter of 2020 the Company furloughed
employees, who returned to work after the Company received proceeds from the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) (Note 11). The Company also reduced discretionary spending in 2020.
Supply chain disruptions
which began during the pandemic have continued and may continue for the foreseeable future. While the Company’s operations have not been materially impacted by the general trends in supply chain problems, the Company continues to monitor and
assess potential risks.
F-8
Liquidity and Going Concern
The
Company has been negatively impacted by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, has historically experienced recurring losses, has been dependent on raising capital from the sale of securities in order to continue to operate and refinanced its debt at a
lower interest rate. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company received cash proceeds from the PPP Loan, which was forgiven, and the Economic Injury Disaster Loan (the “EIDL Loan”) that was repaid at the time the Senior Term Facility was entered
into with MidCap Financial Trust in September 2021 (Note 11). Additionally, in October 2021, the Company entered into an equity distribution agreement with an investment bank under which the Company may sell up to $11.0 million of its common stock in registered “at-the-market” offerings (Note 13). Management believes that the Company’s cash and cash equivalents,
combined with the anticipated revenues from the sale or use of its products, will be sufficient to satisfy the Company’s working capital needs, capital asset purchases, outstanding commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with its
existing operations for at least the next 12 months following the date of the issuance of these consolidated financial statements. However, the negative impact of the ongoing COVID-19 outbreak on the financial markets and supply chain disruptions
could interfere with the Company’s ability to access financing or financing on favorable terms.
2. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars and have been prepared in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Any reference in these notes to applicable guidance is meant to refer to the authoritative GAAP as found in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and as amended
by Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”) of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and Photomedex India Private Limited, its wholly-owned
subsidiary in India. No operating activities have occurred within the Company’s subsidiary as of and during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated
financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated
financial statements, and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. The Company’s significant estimates and judgments involve revenue recognition with respect to deferred revenues and the contract term and
valuation allowances of accounts receivable, inputs used when evaluating goodwill for impairment, inputs used in the valuation of acquired intangible assets, state sales and use tax accruals, the estimated useful lives of intangible assets,
and the valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications from the prior year presentation have been made to conform to the current year presentation.
Concentrations of Credit Risk and Major Customers
The Company’s cash is held on deposit in demand accounts at a large financial institution in amounts in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, insurance
coverage limit of $0.3 million per depositor, per FDIC-insured bank, per ownership category. Management has reviewed the financial statements of this institution and believes it has sufficient assets and liquidity to conduct its operations in
the ordinary course of business with little credit risk to the Company.
Financial instruments that
potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk principally consist of cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company limits its credit risk associated with cash equivalents by placing investments in highly-rated
money market funds. The Company limits its credit risk with respect to accounts receivable by performing credit evaluations when deemed necessary, but it does not require collateral to secure amounts owed by its customers.
F-9
The Company had one customer, an
international distributor from which it earns dermatology recurring procedures and dermatology procedures equipment revenues, that accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s revenues for the year ended December 31, 2021, and its former
international master distributor from which it earned dermatology procedures equipment revenues that accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s revenues for the year ended December 31, 2020. Revenues from this customer and the former
international master distributor were $3.4 million and $2.7 million, or 11% and 12%, of total net revenues during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Accounts receivable associated with the Company’s
customer and former international master distributor were less than 10% of total accounts receivable as of December 31, 2021 and
2020, respectively. No other customer represented more than 10% of total accounts receivable as of December 31, 2021 or 2020.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly-liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. As of
December 31, 2021 and 2020, cash equivalents consisted of credit card transactions with settlement terms of less than five days.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash represents amounts held on deposit at a commercial bank used to secure the Company’s Note Payable. The Note Payable was repaid
during the year ended December 31, 2021. The following table provides a reconciliation of the components of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets to the
total of the amount presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows (in thousands):
December 31,
|
||||||||
2021
|
2020
|
|||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
12,586
|
$
|
10,604
|
||||
Restricted cash
|
—
|
7,508
|
||||||
Total cash and restricted cash presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows
|
$
|
12,586
|
$
|
18,112
|
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable primarily relates to amounts due from customers, which are typically due within 30 to 90 days from invoice date. The Company provides credit to its customers in the normal course of business and
maintains allowances for potential credit losses. The Company does not require collateral or other security for accounts receivable. The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from amounts deemed to
be uncollectible from its customers. These allowances are for specific amounts on certain customer accounts based on facts and circumstances determined on a case-by-case basis. The Company writes off accounts receivable when they are
considered uncollectible, and payments subsequently received on such receivables are credited to bad debt expense. The Company does not recognize interest accruing on accounts receivable past due.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined based on purchased cost for raw materials and all
production cost related to the laser manufacturing process (labor and indirect manufacturing cost, including sub-contracted work components) for work-in-process and finished goods is classified as inventory. For the Company’s products, cost is
determined on the first-in, first-out method. Work-in-process is immaterial, given the typically short manufacturing cycle and therefore, is disclosed in conjunction with raw
materials.
The Company’s equipment for the
treatment of skin disorders (e.g. the XTRAC) will either (i) be placed in a physician’s office and remain the property of the Company (at which date such equipment is transferred to property and equipment) or (ii) be sold to distributors or
physicians directly. The cost to build a laser, whether for sale or for placement, is accumulated in inventory.
F-10
Reserves for slow-moving and obsolete inventories are provided based on
historical experience and product demand. Management evaluates the adequacy of these reserves periodically based on forecasted sales and market trends.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred and costs of
improvements and renewals are capitalized. Upon retirement or disposition, the applicable property and equipment amounts are deducted from the accounts and any gain or loss is recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. Depreciation and amortization are recognized using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the related assets. The Company uses an
estimated useful life of three years for computers, hardware and software, five years for machinery and equipment and seven years for furniture and fixtures and the lesser of the useful life or lease term for leasehold improvements.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist of core technology, product technology, customer relationships, trademarks and distribution rights. Intangible assets are
amortized over the period of estimated benefit using the straight-line method and estimated useful lives ranging from
to 12 years.Goodwill
Goodwill is the excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net amounts assigned to tangible and intangible assets acquired and
liabilities assumed. Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to an annual impairment test. The Company has two reporting units
and goodwill is allocated to the reporting units.
The Company performs its goodwill impairment test on an
annual basis in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year or more frequently if changes in circumstances or the occurrence of events suggest that an
impairment exists. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is less than the carrying value of the
reporting unit’s goodwill. The Company bypassed the qualitative assessment and did a quantitative assessment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount.The Company’s annual goodwill impairment test resulted in no impairment charges during
the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Intangibles
The Company reviews its long-lived assets and intangible assets subject to amortization for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate the carrying amount of an asset group may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets held and used is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of an asset group to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset
group. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds the fair value of the asset group, less costs to sell. The Company did not record any charges related to asset impairment during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Fair Value Measurements
The Company measures financial assets and liabilities at fair value at each reporting period using a fair value hierarchy that requires the use of
observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at
the measurement date. Fair value is estimated by applying the following hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that
is available and significant to the fair value measurement:
F-11
•
|
Level 1 – quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
|
•
|
Level 2 – observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other
inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
|
•
|
Level 3 – inputs that are generally unobservable and typically reflect the Company’s estimate of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
|
Accrued Warranty Costs
The Company offers a
standard warranty on product sales generally for a The activity in the warranty accrual during the years ended December 31,
2021 and 2020 is summarized as follows (in thousands): to two-year period, however, the Company has offered longer warranty periods, ranging from to four years, in order to meet competition or to meet customer demands. The Company
provides for the estimated cost of the future warranty claims on the date the product is sold.
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2021
|
2020
|
|||||||
Balance, beginning of year
|
$
|
113
|
$
|
232
|
||||
Additions
|
71
|
67
|
||||||
Expirations and claims satisfied
|
(105
|
)
|
(186
|
)
|
||||
Total
|
79
|
113
|
||||||
Less current portion within accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
(59
|
)
|
(87
|
)
|
||||
Balance within deferred revenues and other liabilities
|
$
|
20
|
$
|
26
|
Debt Issuance Costs
The Company capitalizes direct costs incurred to obtain debt financing and amortizes these costs to interest expense over
the term of the debt using the effective interest method. These costs are recorded as a debt discount and are netted against the related debt on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues from the Company’s dermatology recurring procedures customers are earned by providing physicians with its laser products and charging the physicians a fee for a fixed number of treatment sessions or a fixed fee
for a specified period of time not to exceed an agreed upon number of treatments; if that number is exceeded additional fees will have to be paid. The placement of the laser products at physician locations represents embedded leases which are
accounted for as operating leases. For the lasers placed-in service under these arrangements, the terms of the domestic arrangements are generally 36
months with automatic one-year renewals and include a termination clause that can be effected at any time by either party with 30 to 60 day notice. Amounts paid
are generally non-refundable. Sales of access codes for a fixed number of treatment sessions are considered variable treatment code payments and are recognized as revenue over the estimated usage period of the agreed upon number of
treatments. Sales of access codes for a specified period of time are recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis as the lasers are being used over the term period specified in the agreement. Variable treatment code payments that will be
paid only if the customer exceeds the agreed upon number of treatments are recognized only when such treatments are being exceeded and used. Internationally, the Company generally sells access codes for a fixed amount on a monthly basis to
its distributors and the terms are generally 48 months, with termination in the event of the customers’ failure to remit payments
timely, and include a potential buy-out at the end of the term of the contract. Currently, this is the only foreign recurring revenue. Prepaid amounts recorded in deferred revenue and customer deposits recorded in accounts payable are
recognized as revenue over the lease term in the patterns described above. Pricing is fixed with the customer. With respect to lease and non-lease components, the Company adopted the practical expedient to account for the arrangement as a
single lease component.
F-12
Revenues from the Company’s dermatology procedures equipment are recognized when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to its
customers or distributors, in an amount that reflects the consideration to which it expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Accordingly, the Company determines revenue recognition through the following steps:
• |
identification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer;
|
• |
identification of the performance obligations in the contract;
|
• |
determination of the transaction price;
|
• |
allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and
|
• |
recognition of revenue when, or as, performance obligations are satisfied.
|
Accounting for the Company’s contracts involves the use of significant judgments and estimates including determining the separate performance obligations, allocating the
transaction price to the different performance obligations and determining the method to measure the entity’s performance toward satisfaction of performance obligations that most faithfully depicts when control is transferred to the customer.
The Company allocates the contract’s transaction price to each performance obligation using the Company’s best estimate of the standalone selling price for each distinct good or service in the contract. The Company maximizes the use of
observable inputs by beginning with average historical contractual selling prices and adjusting as necessary and on a consistent and rational basis for other inputs such as pricing trends, customer types, volumes and changing cost and
margins.
Revenues from dermatology procedures equipment are recognized when control of the promised products is transferred to either the Company’s distributors or end-user customers, in
an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those products (the transaction price). Control transfers to the customer at a point in time. To indicate the transfer of control, the Company
must have a present right to payment and legal title must have passed to the customer. The Company ships most of its products FOB shipping point, and as such, the Company primarily transfers control and records revenue upon shipment. From
time to time the Company will grant certain customers, for example governmental customers, FOB destination terms, and the transfer of control for revenue recognition occurs upon receipt. The Company has elected to recognize the cost of
freight and shipping activities as fulfillment costs. Amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are included as part of the transaction price and recognized as revenue when control of the underlying goods are transferred to the
customer. The related shipping and freight charges incurred by the Company are included in cost of revenues.
The following table presents the Company’s net revenues disaggregated by dermatology recurring procedures and dermatology procedures equipment (in thousands):
Year Ended
December 31,
|
||||||||
2021
|
2020
|
|||||||
Dermatology recurring procedures
|
$
|
22,528
|
$
|
17,409
|
||||
Dermatology procedures equipment
|
7,449
|
5,681
|
||||||
Total net revenues
|
$
|
29,977
|
$
|
23,090
|
The following table summarizes the Company’s expected future undiscounted fixed treatment code payments from dermatology recurring procedures (in thousands):
Years ending December 31:
|
||||
|
$
|
1,680
|
||
|
1,624
|
|||
|
1,303
|
|||
|
530
|
|||
|
4
|
|||
$
|
5,141
|
F-13
Remaining performance obligations related to ASC 606 represent the aggregate transaction price allocated to performance obligations with an original contract term greater than
one year, which are fully or partially unsatisfied at the end of the period. Remaining performance obligations include the potential obligation to perform under extended warranties but exclude any dermatology procedures equipment accounted
for as leases. As of
December 31, 2021 and 2020, the aggregate amount of the transaction price
allocated to remaining performance obligations was $26 thousand and $115 thousand, respectively, and the Company expects to recognize $12
thousand and $108 thousand, respectively, of the remaining performance obligations within one year and the remainder over to three years. Contract assets primarily relate to the Company’s rights to consideration for work completed in relation to its services
performed but not billed at the reporting date. The contract assets are transferred to receivables when the rights become unconditional. Currently, the Company does not have any contract assets which have not transferred to a receivable.
Contract liabilities primarily relate to extended warranties where the Company has received payments but has not yet satisfied the related performance obligations. The allocations of the
transaction price are based on the price of stand-alone warranty contracts sold in the ordinary course of business. The advance consideration received from customers for the warranty services is a contract liability that is recognized
ratably over the warranty period. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the $12 thousand and $108 thousand of short-term contract liabilities, respectively, is presented as deferred revenues and the $14 thousand and $7 thousand of
long-term contract liabilities, respectively, is presented within deferred revenues and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company recognized $0.1 million and $0.2 million,
respectively, as revenue from amounts classified as contract liabilities (i.e. deferred revenues) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.
With respect to contract acquisition costs, the Company applied the practical
expedient and expenses these costs immediately.
Engineering and Product Development
Engineering and product development costs associated with research, new product development and product redesign are expensed
as incurred.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and included in selling and marketing expenses within the Company’s consolidated statement of
operations. The Company recognized advertising costs of $1.6 million and $0.7 million during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company measures share-based awards at their grant-date fair value and records compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period of the awards.
Estimating the fair value of share-based awards requires the input of subjective assumptions, including the expected life of the options and
stock price volatility. The Company accounts for forfeitures of stock option awards as they occur. The estimated fair value of restricted stock awards is equal to the Company’s common stock price at the grant date. The Company uses the
Black-Scholes option pricing model to value its stock option awards. The assumptions used in estimating the fair value of stock-option awards represent management’s estimate and involve inherent uncertainties and the application of
management’s judgment. As a result, if factors change and management uses different assumptions, share-based compensation expense could be materially different for future awards.
F-14
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined
based on differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities, as well as on net operating loss carryforwards, and are measured using enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the
differences reverse. Any resulting net deferred tax assets are evaluated for recoverability and, accordingly, a valuation allowance is provided when it is not more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will be
realized.
The Company recognizes the tax effects of uncertain tax positions only if the position is “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained were it to be
challenged by a taxing authority. The assessment of the tax position is based solely on the technical merits of the position, without regard to the likelihood that the tax position may be challenged. If an uncertain tax position meets the
“more-likely-than-not” threshold, the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50% likely to be recognized upon ultimate settlement with the taxing authority is recorded. The Company has no uncertain tax positions as of December 31,
2021. The Company includes interest and penalties related to income tax obligations within income tax expense. The Company’s tax years are still under open status from 2017 to present.
Net Loss Per Share
Basic net loss per share of common stock is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of
shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Diluted loss per share of common stock includes the effect, if any, from the potential exercise or conversion of securities such as unvested restricted stock awards, stock options and
warrants for common stock which would result in the issuance of incremental shares of common stock. For diluted net loss per share, the weighted-average number of shares of common stock is the same as for basic net loss per share due to the
fact that when a net loss exists, dilutive securities are not included in the calculation as the impact is anti-dilutive.
Shares
of the Company’s Series C convertible preferred stock are subordinate to all other securities at the same subordination level as common stock and they participate in all dividends and distributions declared or paid with respect to common
stock of the Company, on an as-converted basis. Therefore, the Series C convertible preferred stock meets the definition of common stock. Net loss per share is presented for each class of security meeting the definition of common stock. The
net loss is allocated to each class of security meeting the definition of common stock based on their contractual terms.
The following potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the computation of diluted weighted-average shares of common stock
outstanding, as they would be anti-dilutive:
December 31,
|
||||||||
2021
|
2020
|
|||||||
Unvested restricted stock units
|
90,540
|
—
|
||||||
Stock options
|
3,938,613
|
5,292,888
|
||||||
Common stock warrants
|
373,626
|
19,812
|
||||||
|
4,402,779
|
5,312,700
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial
Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, as amended subsequently by ASUs 2018-19, 2019-04, 2019-05, 2019-10, 2019-11 and 2020-03. The guidance in the ASUs requires that credit
losses be reported using an expected losses model rather than the incurred losses model that is currently used. The standard also establishes additional disclosures related to credit risks. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2022 and early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe this will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. ASU 2019-12 eliminated certain exceptions and changed guidance on other matters. The exceptions relate to the
allocation of income taxes in separate company financial statements, tax accounting for equity method investments and accounting for income taxes when the interim period year-to-date loss exceeds the anticipated full year loss. The changes
relate to the accounting for franchise taxes that are income-based and non-income-based, determining if a step up in tax basis is part of a business combination or if it is a separate transaction, when enacted tax law changes should be
included in the annual effective tax rate computation, and the allocation of taxes in separate company financial statements to a legal entity that is not subject to income tax. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU 2019-12 on January 1, 2021 did not have a material
effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
F-15
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting and in January 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-01, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope. These pronouncements provide temporary optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP principles to contract modifications and hedging relationships to ease the financial reporting
burdens of the expected market transition from LIBOR and other interbank offered rates to alternative reference rates. The transition period for adopting these ASUs is March 2020 through December 31, 2022. The Company
continues to evaluate the temporary expedients and options available under this guidance and the effects of these pronouncements and, as the Company does not have any hedging activities, does not believe this will have a material effect on
its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivative and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s own Equity. The
pronouncement simplifies the accounting for certain financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity, including convertible instruments and contracts on an entity’s own equity. Specifically, the ASU simplifies accounting
for convertible instruments by removing major separation models required under current GAAP. In addition, the ASU removes certain settlement conditions that are required for equity contracts to qualify for it and simplifies the diluted
earnings per share (EPS) calculations in certain areas. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023 and early adoption is
permitted. The Company does not currently engage in contracts covered by this guidance and does not believe it will have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, but it could in the future.
In May 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-04, Earnings per Share (Topic 260), Debt – Modifications and Extinguishments (Subtopic 470-50), Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718), and Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Issuer’s Accounting for Certain Modifications or Exchanges or Freestanding Equity-Classified Written Call Options. The
pronouncement outlines how an entity should account for modifications made to equity-classified written call options, including stock options and warrants to purchase the entity’s own common stock. The guidance in the ASU requires an entity
to treat a modification of an equity-classified written call option that does not cause the option to become liability-classified as an exchange of the original option for a new option. This guidance applies whether the modification is
structured as an amendment to the terms and conditions of the equity-classified written call option or as termination of the original option and issuance of a new option. The guidance is effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2021 and early adoption is permitted.
The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2022 did not
have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
3. Pharos Asset Acquisition
In August 2021, the Company acquired certain assets and liabilities related to the U.S. dermatology Pharos business from Ra
Medical Systems, Inc. (“Ra Medical”). Ra Medical’s Pharos excimer laser system holds FDA clearance to treat chronic skin diseases, including psoriasis, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis and leukoderma. The acquisition of these assets and liabilities
allows the Company to market its full business solutions to Ra Medical’s existing customer base comprised of 400 dermatology practices
offering opportunities to increase its recurring revenue base and a pathway to gain additional placements for the Company’s XTRAC excimer laser system.
The purchase price of $3.7 million was paid in cash at
the time of acquisition. In addition, the Company assumed certain extended warranty service contracts associated with acquired laser system products. Concurrent with the purchase of the net assets, the Company and Ra Medical entered into a
services agreement whereby Ra Medical will provide certain transitional services for the Company as it integrates the acquired assets into the Company. The Company determined this transaction represented an asset acquisition as substantially
all of the value was in the acquired customer list intangible asset as defined by ASC 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”).
F-16
The purchase price was allocated, on a relative fair value basis, to the acquired inventory, customer lists and deferred
revenues as follows (in thousands):
Consideration:
|
||||
Cash payment
|
$
|
3,700
|
||
Transaction costs
|
57
|
|||
Total consideration
|
$
|
3,757
|
||
Assets acquired:
|
||||
Inventory
|
$
|
284
|
||
Customer lists
|
5,314
|
|||
Total assets acquired
|
$
|
5,598
|
||
Liabilities assumed:
|
||||
Deferred revenues – service contracts
|
$
|
1,841
|
||
Total liabilities assumed
|
$
|
1,841
|
Net assets acquired
|
$
|
3,757
|
The customer lists intangible asset is being amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of 12 years. As the transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition, the Company allocated consideration paid to the inventory acquired and the
deferred revenues assumed, with the remaining consideration paid allocated to the customer lists intangible asset, which also equals its estimated fair value. The intangible asset was valued using an excess earnings model. Significant assumptions
used in the excess earnings model include estimated customer sales growth, customer attrition and weighted average cost of capital of 3%,
5% and 17%, respectively.
4. Fair Value Measurements
The carrying values of
cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, and accounts payable on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets approximated their fair values as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 due to their
short-term nature. The carrying value of the Company’s current Senior Term Facility approximated its fair value as of December 31, 2021 due to its variable interest rate.
5. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31,
|
||||||||
2021
|
2020
|
|||||||
Raw materials and work-in-process
|
$
|
3,201
|
$
|
2,949
|
||||
Finished goods
|
288
|
495
|
||||||
$
|
3,489
|
$
|
3,444
|
Work-in-process is immaterial given the Company’s typically short manufacturing cycle and therefore, is included in with raw materials.
F-17
6. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31, | ||||||||
|
2021
|
2020
|
||||||
Lasers placed-in-service
|
$
|
25,949
|
$
|
22,942
|
||||
Equipment, computer hardware and software
|
238
|
146
|
||||||
Furniture and fixtures
|
213
|
243
|
||||||
Leasehold improvements
|
254
|
43
|
||||||
|
26,654
|
23,374
|
||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(19,771
|
)
|
(17,845
|
)
|
||||
|
$
|
6,883
|
$
|
5,529
|
The Company recorded depreciation and amortization expense of $2.1 million and $2.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2021
and 2020, respectively.
7. Leases
The Company recognizes
right-of-use assets (“ROU assets”) and operating lease liabilities when it obtains the right to control an asset under a leasing arrangement with an initial term greater than 12 months. The Company adopted the short-term accounting election for
leases with a duration of less than one year. The Company leases its facilities and certain IT and office equipment under non-cancellable operating leases. All of the Company’s leasing arrangements are classified as operating leases with
remaining lease terms ranging from 1 to 3 years, and one facility lease has a renewal option for two years. Renewal options have been excluded from the
determination of the lease term as they are not reasonably certain of exercise.
Operating lease costs
were $0.4 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of
operating lease liabilities was $0.5 million and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the incremental borrowing rate was 9.76% and the weighted average remaining lease term was 2.3
years and 3.1 years, respectively.
The following table
summarizes the Company’s operating lease maturities as of December 31, 2021 (in thousands):
Years ending December 31:
|
||||
2022
|
$
|
371
|
||
2023
|
242
|
|||
2024
|
186
|
|||
Total remaining lease payments
|
799
|
|||
Less: imputed interest
|
(89
|
)
|
||
Total lease liabilities
|
$
|
710
|
With
respect to lease and non-lease components, the Company adopted the practical expedient to account for the lessee arrangement as a single lease component.
F-18
8. Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31, 2021 |
Balance
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Net Book
Value
|
|||||||||
Core technology
|
$
|
5,700
|
$
|
(3,705
|
)
|
$
|
1,995
|
|||||
Product technology
|
2,000
|
(2,000
|
)
|
—
|
||||||||
Customer relationships
|
6,900
|
(4,485
|
)
|
2,415
|
||||||||
Tradenames
|
1,500
|
(975
|
)
|
525
|
||||||||
Pharos customer lists
|
5,314 | (166 | ) | 5,148 | ||||||||
|
$
|
21,414
|
$
|
(11,331
|
)
|
$
|
10,083
|
December 31, 2020 |
Balance
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Net Book
Value
|
|||||||||
Core technology
|
$
|
5,700
|
$
|
(3,135
|
)
|
$
|
2,565
|
|||||
Product technology
|
2,000
|
(2,000
|
)
|
—
|
||||||||
Customer relationships
|
6,900
|
(3,795
|
)
|
3,105
|
||||||||
Tradenames
|
1,500
|
(825
|
)
|
675
|
||||||||
|
$
|
16,100
|
$
|
(9,755
|
)
|
$
|
6,345
|
The Company recorded amortization expense of $1.6
million during each of the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
The following table summarizes the
estimated future amortization expense for the above intangible assets for the next five years (in thousands):
Years ending December 31: |
||||
2022
|
$
|
1,853
|
||
2023
|
1,853
|
|||
2024
|
1,853
|
|||
2025
|
1,148
|
|||
2026
|
443
|
Goodwill consists of the following (in thousands):
December 31,
|
||||||||
2021
|
2020
|
|||||||
Dermatology recurring procedures segment
|
$
|
7,958
|
$
|
7,958
|
||||
Dermatology procedures equipment segment
|
845
|
845
|
||||||
$
|
8,803
|
$
|
8,803
|
F-19
9. Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31, | ||||||||
2021 |
2020 | |||||||
Warranty obligations
|
$
|
59
|
$
|
87
|
||||
Compensation and related benefits
|
2,052
|
891
|
||||||
State sales, use and other taxes
|
3,697
|
3,105
|
||||||
Professional fees and other
|
569
|
607
|
||||||
|
$
|
6,377
|
$
|
4,690
|
10. Note Payable
In December 2020, the Company had renewed its $7.3
million loan with a commercial bank pursuant to a one-year Fixed Rate – Term Promissory Note (the “Note”). The Company’s
obligations under the Note were secured by an Assignment and Pledge of Time Deposit (“Time Deposit”), under which the Company had pledged to the commercial bank the proceeds of a time deposit account in the amount of the loan and recorded the
time deposit and accrued interest as restricted cash on the balance sheet. The principal was due on December 30, 2021 with no
penalties for prepayments. The interest rate was fixed at 1.40%. The secured time deposit had a fixed interest rate of 0.40%. The Company repaid the Note with the proceeds from the Time Deposit in September 2021.
11. Long-Term Debt
Senior Term Facility
On September 30, 2021, the Company entered into a
credit and security agreement with MidCap Financial Trust, also acting as the administrative agent, and the lenders identified therein (“Senior Term Facility”). The Senior Term Facility provides for an $8.0 million senior term loan that was drawn upon by the Company upon executing the agreement. On September 30, 2021, the Company also repaid the
outstanding principal and interest for its Note (Note 10) and the Economic Injury Disaster Loan. Borrowings under the Senior Term Facility bear interest at LIBOR (with a LIBOR floor rate of 0.50%) plus 7.50% per year and mature on September 1, 2026, unless terminated earlier. The interest rate was 8.00% as of December 31, 2021. The Company is obligated to make monthly
interest-only payments through September 30, 2024. From October 1, 2024 to the date of maturity, the Company will make 24 equal
monthly principal payments plus interest, and all borrowings are secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets. The Senior Debt Facility was amended on January 10, 2022 to provide MidCap Financial Trust’s consent to the acquisition of
TheraClear (Note 18).
The Company may voluntarily prepay the outstanding
term loan, with such prepayment of at least $5.0 million, at any time upon 30 days’ written notice. Upon prepayment, the Company will be required to pay a prepayment fee equal to (i) 4.00% of the outstanding principal prepaid or required to be prepaid (whichever is greater), if the prepayment is made within 12 months of September 30, 2021, (ii) 3.00% of the outstanding principal prepaid or required to be prepaid (whichever is greater), if the prepayment is made between 12 months and 24
months after September 30, 2021, (iii) 2.00% of the outstanding principal prepaid or required to be prepaid (whichever is
greater), if the prepayment is made between 24 months and 36 months after September 30, 2021, or (iv) 1.00% of the outstanding
principal prepaid or required to be prepaid (whichever is greater), if the prepayment is made after 36 months after September 30, 2021 and prior to the maturity date.
The Senior Term Facility contains certain customary representations and warranties, affirmative covenants and conditions. The Senior Term Facility
also contains a number of negative covenants that subject the Company to certain exceptions and waivers and restrictions, as defined in the agreement. In addition, the Senior Term Facility contains a quarterly financial covenant that requires
the Company to not have less than $24.0 million of net revenue for the trailing 12-month period, with compliance measured on the last
day of each fiscal quarter beginning on September 30, 2021. At December 31, 2021, the minimum net revenue threshold was $25.0
million. The minimum net revenue threshold will increase to $30.0 million by December 31, 2023. At December 31, 2021, the Company was
in compliance with all financial and nonfinancial covenants within the Senior Term Facility.
F-20
The Senior Term Facility contains customary indemnification obligations and customary events of default, including, among other things, (i)
nonpayment, (ii) breach of warranty, (iii) nonperformance of covenants and obligations, (iv) default on other indebtedness, (v) judgments, (vi) change of control, (vii) bankruptcy and insolvency, (viii) impairment of security, (ix) regulatory
matters, (x) failure to remain a publicly traded company, and (xi) material adverse event. Where an event of default arises from certain bankruptcy events, the commitments shall automatically and immediately terminate and the principal of, and
interest then outstanding on, all of the loans shall become immediately due and payable. Subject to certain notice requirements and other conditions, upon the occurrence of other events of default, including the occurrence of a condition having
or reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect, commitments may be terminated and the principal of, and interest then outstanding on, all of the loans may become immediately due and payable. At December 31, 2021, no event of default had
occurred and the Company believed that events or conditions having a material adverse effect, giving rise to an acceleration of any amounts outstanding under the Senior Term Facility, had not occurred and was remote.
In connection with entering into the Senior Term Facility, the Company issued an affiliate of the lender a warrant to purchase 373,626 shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial exercise price of $1.82 per share. The warrant is equity classified and is exercisable at any time on or prior to the tenth anniversary of its issue date. The estimated fair value of the
warrants was $0.6 million and determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The key assumptions used in the Black-Scholes
option pricing model were (i) an expected term of ten years, (ii) expected volatility of 88.6%, (iii) a risk-free rate of 1.50% and (iv) no estimated dividend yield. In addition, the Company incurred third party costs and lender fees of $0.1 million. The proceeds were allocated on a basis that approximates the relative fair value method. The fair value of the warrants and fees incurred were recorded as a
debt discount and are being recognized as interest expense over the life of the Senior Term Facility using the effective-interest method. The unamortized debt discount was $0.7 million as of December 31, 2021. The Company recognized interest expense of $0.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2021, of which $37 thousand was related to the
amortization of the debt discount.
Future minimum principal payments at December 31, 2021 are as follows (in thousands):
Years ending December 31:
|
||||
2024
|
$
|
1,000
|
||
2025
|
4,000
|
|||
2026
|
3,000
|
|||
$
|
8,000
|
Paycheck Protection Program Loan
On April 22, 2020, the Company closed a loan of $2.0
million (the “PPP Loan”) from a commercial bank, pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) administered by the Small Business Administration (the “SBA”) pursuant to the CARES Act. The PPP Loan would have matured on May 1, 2022 and bore an interest rate of 1%
per year. Payments of principal and interest of any unforgiven balance was scheduled to commence December 1, 2020, but was deferred until the SBA approved of the forgiveness amount. In the second quarter of 2021, the Company received
notification that the PPP Loan had been forgiven. Accordingly, the Company recorded a gain on forgiveness of debt in the amount of the loan of $2.0
million.
Economic Injury Disaster Loan
On May 22, 2020, the Company secured the EIDL Loan from the SBA under its Economic Injury Disaster Loan (“EIDL”) assistance program in light of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the
Company’s business. The principal amount of the EIDL Loan is up to $0.5 million, with proceeds to be used for working capital
purposes, and is collateralized by all the Company’s assets. On June 12, 2020, the Company received these funds from the SBA. Interest accrued at the rate of 3.75% per year. Installment payments, including principal and interest, were originally due monthly beginning March 26, 2021 (12 months from the date of the promissory note) in the amount of $2 thousand. In March 2021, the SBA deferred payments on the EIDL loans by an additional 12 months. The balance of principal and interest was
payable over the next 30 years from the date of the promissory note. There were no penalties for prepayment. Based upon guidance
issued by the SBA on June 19, 2020, the EIDL Loan was not required to be refinanced by the PPP Loan. On September 30, 2021, the Company repaid this loan in full.
F-21
12. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Matters
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is routinely a defendant in or party to pending and threatened legal actions and proceedings,
including actions brought on behalf of various classes of claimants. These actions and proceedings are generally based on alleged violations of employment, contract and other laws. In some of these actions and proceedings, claims for
substantial monetary damages are asserted against the Company. In the ordinary course of business, the Company is also subject to regulatory and governmental examinations, information gathering requests, inquiries, investigations, and
threatened legal actions and proceedings. In connection with formal and informal inquiries by federal, state, local and foreign agencies, the Company receives numerous requests, subpoenas and orders for documents, testimony and information in
connection with various aspects of its activities.
Sales and Use Tax Matters
The Company records state sales tax collected and remitted for its customers on dermatology procedures equipment sales on a net basis, excluded from revenue. The Company’s sales tax expense
that is not presently being collected and remitted for the recurring revenue business is recorded in general and administrative expenses within the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company believes its state sales and use tax accruals have been properly recognized such that, if the Company’s arrangements with customers are deemed more likely than not that the Company would not be exempt from sales tax in a particular
state, the basis for measurement of the state sales and use tax is calculated in accordance with ASC 405, Liabilities, as a transaction tax. If and when the Company is successful in defending itself or
in settling the sales tax obligation for a lesser amount, the reversal of this liability is to be recorded in the period the settlement is reached. However, the precise scope, timing and time period at issue, as well as the final outcome of any
audit and actual settlement, remains uncertain.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is, from time to time, subject to audits performed by state taxing authorities. These actions and
proceedings are generally based on the position that the arrangements entered into by the Company are subject to sales and use tax rather than exempt from tax under applicable law. Several states have assessed the Company an aggregate of
$2.4 million including penalties and interest for the period from March 2014 through April 2020. The Company received
notification that an administrative state judge issued an opinion finding in favor of the Company that the sale of XTRAC treatment codes was not taxable as sales tax with respect to that state’s first assessment. This ruling covers $1.5 million of the total $2.4
million of assessments. The jurisdiction filed an appeal of the administrative law judge’s finding and, following the submission of legal briefs by both sides and oral argument held in January 2022, the appeal is still in process.
The Company is also in another jurisdiction’s
administrative process of appeal with respect to the remaining $0.9 million of assessments, and the timing of the process has been
impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. If there is a determination that the true object of the Company’s recurring revenue model is not exempt from sales taxes and is not a prescription medicine, or the Company does not have other defenses where
the Company prevails, the Company may be subject to sales taxes in those particular states for previous years and in the future, plus potential interest and penalties.
F-22
Employee 401(k) Savings
Plan
The Company sponsors a 401(k) defined contribution retirement savings plan that covers all eligible employees who have met the minimum age and
service requirements. Under the plan, eligible employees may contribute a portion of their annual compensation into the plan up to IRS annual limits. The Company has elected to make matching contributions to the plan based on percentage of the
employee’s contribution. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company’s contributions to the plan were $0.3 million
and $0.2 million, respectively.
Contingent Shares
In the event of certain contingencies, the investors in the equity financing in May 2018 may receive additional shares issued pursuant to the Retained Risk Provisions as defined in the Stock
Purchase Agreements (“SPAs”). There were additional contingencies included in the SPAs that expired in May 2020 did not result in the issuance of shares.
13. Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred Stock
The Company is authorized to issue preferred stock with such designation, rights and preferences as may be
determined from time to time by the Company’s Board of Directors. Other than the limitations on conversions to keep each such holder’s beneficial ownership below 9.99%, the terms of the Series C convertible preferred stock generally bestow the same rights to each holder as such holder would receive if they were common stock shareholders and
are not redeemable by the holders, except that the Series C convertible preferred stock shares do not have voting rights. Each share of Series C convertible preferred stock has a stated value of $1,000 and is convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to $2.69. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Series C convertible preferred investors converted 2,103 shares of Series C preferred stock into 782,089 shares common
stock. No preferred shares were outstanding as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Common
Stock
The Company issued 329,076 shares and 15,000 shares upon the exercise of options and issued 234,558 shares and
71,683 shares upon the vesting of restricted stock units during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
In October 2021, the Company entered into an equity distribution agreement under which the Company may sell up to $11.0 million of its shares of common stock in registered “at-the-market” offerings. The shares will be offered at prevailing market prices, and
the Company will pay commissions of up to 3.0% of the gross proceeds from the sale of shares sold through the Company’s agent,
which may act as an agent and/or principal. The Company has no obligation to sell any shares under this agreement and may, at any time, suspend solicitations under this agreement. No shares of the Company’s common stock have been sold under this distribution agreement during fiscal 2021.
Common Stock
Warrants
In September 2021 and in connection with entering into the Company’s Senior Term Facility (Note 11), the Company issued a warrant to purchase 373,626 shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial exercise price of $1.82 per share. The warrant is equity classified and is exercisable at any time on or prior to the tenth anniversary of its issue date. As of December 31, 2021, the warrant remains outstanding in its
entirety.
14. Stock-Based Compensation
The
Company’s 2016 Omnibus Incentive Stock Plan (“2016 Plan”), as amended, has reserved up to 7,832,651 shares of common stock for
future issuance. As of December 31, 2021, there were 3,932,271 shares of common stock remaining available for issuance for
awards under the 2016 Plan.
F-23
The
Company measures share‑based awards at their grant‑date fair value and records compensation expense on a straight‑line basis over the requisite service period of the awards. The Company recorded share‑based compensation expense of $1.6 million (for all awards and modifications, if any) for each of the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, within general and
administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
In connection with the separation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer in February 2021, the Company accelerated the vesting of all unvested options to purchase shares of common stock and extended the period to exercise to
August 22, 2021. This acceleration and the extension of the period to vest met the modification criteria for accounting purposes. For these modifications, the Company calculated and recorded additional compensation expense of $0.2 million.
Stock Options
The
following table summarizes stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:
|
Number
of
Shares
under
Option
Plan
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price per
Option
|
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (in
years)
|
|||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2020
|
4,908,038
|
$
|
1.90
|
|||||||||
Granted
|
400,000
|
1.46
|
||||||||||
Exercised
|
(15,000
|
)
|
1.29
|
|||||||||
Forfeited and expired
|
(150
|
)
|
170.00
|
|||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2021
|
5,292,888
|
$
|
1.87
|
7.69
|
||||||||
Granted
|
2,463,714
|
1.70
|
||||||||||
Exercised
|
(1,557,628
|
)
|
1.12
|
|||||||||
Forfeited and expired
|
(2,260,361
|
)
|
2.10
|
|||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2021
|
3,938,613
|
$
|
1.90
|
7.91
|
||||||||
Exercisable at December 31, 2021
|
1,216,564
|
$
|
2.32
|
4.86
|
The weighted‑average grant date fair value of options granted was $1.27 and $1.11 per share during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. As of December 31, 2021, the total unrecognized compensation expense
related to unvested stock option awards was $2.8 million, which the Company expects to recognize over a weighted‑average period of
approximately 2.6 years. The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and options exercisable at December 31, 2021 was $26 thousand and $4 thousand,
respectively, and the aggregate intrinsic value of options that were exercised during the year ended December 31, 2021 was $0.5
million. The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and options exercisable at December 31, 2020 was $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively, and the aggregate intrinsic value of options that were exercised during the year ended December 31, 2020 was $3 thousand.
During
the year ended December 31, 2021, there were 1,557,628 options that were exercised on a cashless basis at $1.12 per share resulting in the net issuance of 329,076
shares of common stock.
The
fair value of options is estimated using the Black Scholes option pricing model which takes into account inputs such as the exercise price, the value of the underlying common stock at the grant date, expected term, expected volatility, risk
free interest rate and dividend yield. The fair value of each grant of options during the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was determined using the methods and assumptions discussed below.
●
|
The expected term of employee options is based on the observed and expected time to full-vesting, forfeiture and exercise. Groups of employees that have
similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. Options expire up to a maximum of ten years
from the date of grant.
|
F-24
●
|
The expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s common stock.
|
●
|
The risk-free interest rate is based on the interest rate payable on U.S. Treasury securities in effect at the time of grant for a period that is commensurate
with the assumed expected term.
|
●
|
The expected dividend yield is none because the Company has not historically paid and does not expect for the foreseeable future to pay a dividend on its
ordinary shares.
|
For the years ended December 31, 2021 and
2020, the grant date fair value of all option grants was estimated at the time of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the following weighted average assumptions:
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2021
|
2020
|
||||||
Expected term (in years)
|
5.96
|
6.00
|
||||||
Expected volatility
|
90.03
|
%
|
94.00
|
%
|
||||
Risk-free rate
|
1.08
|
%
|
0.53
|
%
|
||||
Dividend rate
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
Restricted Stock Units
Restricted
stock units have been issued to certain board members. Restricted stock units unvested are summarized in the following table:
|
Number
of
Units
|
Weighted-
Average
Grant
Date Fair
Value
|
||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2020
|
77,237
|
$
|
2.46
|
|||||
Granted
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Vested
|
(68,091
|
)
|
2.46
|
|||||
Forfeited and expired
|
(9,146
|
)
|
2.46
|
|||||
Unvested at January 1, 2021
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
|||||
Granted
|
290,861
|
1.44
|
||||||
Vested
|
(146,364
|
)
|
1.42
|
|||||
Forfeited and expired
|
(53,957
|
)
|
1.45
|
|||||
Unvested at December 31, 2021
|
90,540
|
$
|
1.45
|
As of December 31, 2021, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock units was less than $0.1 million, which the Company expects to recognize over a weighted‑average period of approximately 0.5 years.
F-25
15. Income Taxes
Income tax expense consists of the
following (in thousands):
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2021
|
2020
|
||||||
Current:
|
||||||||
Federal
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||
State
|
22
|
21
|
||||||
|
22
|
21
|
||||||
Deferred:
|
||||||||
Federal
|
23
|
129
|
||||||
State
|
(11
|
)
|
125
|
|||||
|
12
|
254
|
||||||
Income tax expense
|
$
|
34
|
$
|
275
|
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and
liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for years in which differences are expected to reverse.
Significant components of the Company’s
deferred tax liability for federal income taxes consisted of the following:
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2021
|
2020
|
||||||
Deferred tax assets (liabilities) (in thousands)
|
||||||||
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
$
|
46,596
|
$
|
45,819
|
||||
Intangible assets
|
1,039
|
1,450
|
||||||
Inventory
|
26
|
51
|
||||||
Reserves and accrued expenses
|
1,230
|
896
|
||||||
Property and equipment
|
441
|
(178
|
)
|
|||||
Stock-based compensation
|
458
|
808
|
||||||
Operating lease right-of-use assets
|
(159
|
)
|
(249
|
)
|
||||
Goodwill
|
(950 | ) | (815 | ) | ||||
Operating lease liability
|
177
|
272
|
||||||
481(a) adjustment
|
(667
|
)
|
—
|
|||||
Less: valuation allowance
|
(48,457
|
)
|
(48,308
|
)
|
||||
Net deferred tax liability
|
$
|
(266
|
)
|
$
|
(254
|
)
|
In
assessing the need for a valuation allowance, management must determine that there will be sufficient taxable income to allow for the realization of deferred tax assets. Based upon the historical and anticipated future losses, management has
determined that the deferred tax assets do not meet the more likely than not threshold for realizability. Accordingly, a nearly full valuation allowance has been recorded against the Company’s deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2021 and
2020. The valuation allowance increased by $0.1 million and $1.2 million during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The Company does not have unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2021 or 2020. The Company recognizes interest and penalties accrued on any unrecognized tax benefits as a
component of income tax expense.
The
Company had net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards for federal and state income tax purposes as follows (in thousands):
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
Combined NOL carryforwards:
|
2021
|
2020
|
||||||
Federal
|
$
|
204,314
|
$
|
200,976
|
||||
State
|
$
|
60,654
|
$
|
43,501
|
F-26
The
NOL carryforwards generated prior to 2018 begin expiring in 2022 for federal and 2030 for state income tax purposes. Federal and many state NOLs generated in 2018 and into the future now have an indefinite life.
The
NOL carryforwards are subject to review and possible adjustment by the Internal Revenue Service and state tax authorities. NOL carryforwards may become subject to an annual limitation in the event of certain cumulative changes in the ownership
interest of significant stockholders over a three year period in excess of 50%, as defined under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code, respectively, as well as similar state provisions. This could limit the amount of tax attributes
that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income or tax liabilities. The amount of the annual limitation is determined based on the value of the Company immediately prior to the ownership change. Subsequent ownership changes may
further affect the limitation in future years. To date, the Company has not performed an analysis to determine whether or not ownership changes have occurred since inception.
A reconciliation of income tax expense
at the statutory federal income tax rate and income taxes as reflected in the consolidated financial statements is as follows:
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
Rate reconciliation:
|
2021
|
2020
|
||||||
Federal tax expense at statutory rate
|
21.00
|
%
|
21.00
|
%
|
||||
State tax, net of federal benefit
|
(0.33
|
)%
|
6.59
|
%
|
||||
Permanent differences
|
8.90
|
%
|
(2.75
|
)%
|
||||
Other difference and true ups
|
(25.27
|
)%
|
(2.58
|
)%
|
||||
Change in valuation allowance
|
(5.57
|
)%
|
(28.90
|
)%
|
||||
Tax provision
|
(1.27
|
)%
|
(6.64
|
)%
|
16. Business and Geographical Reporting Segments
The Company organized its business into two
operating segments to better align its organization based upon the Company’s management structure, products and services offered, markets served and types of customers, as follows. The Dermatology Recurring Procedures segment derives its
revenues from the usage of its equipment by dermatologists to perform XTRAC procedures. The Dermatology Procedures Equipment segment generates revenues from the sale of equipment, such as lasers and lamp products. Management reviews financial
information presented on an operating segment basis for the purposes of making certain operating decisions and assessing financial performance.
Unallocated operating expenses include costs that are not specific to a particular segment but are general to the group; included are expenses
incurred for administrative and accounting staff, general liability and other insurance, professional fees and other similar corporate expenses. Interest and other financing income (expense) is also not allocated to the operating segments.
F-27
The following tables reflect results of operations from our business segments for the periods indicated below:
Year Ended December 31, 2021 |
Dermatology
Recurring Procedures
|
Dermatology
Procedures Equipment
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
22,528
|
$
|
7,449
|
$
|
29,977
|
||||||
Cost of revenues
|
6,418
|
3,709
|
10,127
|
|||||||||
Gross profit
|
16,110
|
3,740
|
19,850
|
|||||||||
Gross profit %
|
71.5
|
%
|
50.2
|
%
|
66.2
|
%
|
||||||
Allocated expenses:
|
||||||||||||
Engineering and product development
|
1,251
|
183
|
1,434
|
|||||||||
Selling and marketing
|
12,257
|
849
|
13,106
|
|||||||||
Unallocated expenses
|
—
|
—
|
9,712
|
|||||||||
13,508
|
1,032
|
24,252
|
||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations
|
2,602
|
2,708
|
(4,402
|
)
|
||||||||
Interest expense
|
—
|
—
|
(314
|
)
|
||||||||
Interest income |
— | — | 15 | |||||||||
Gain on debt extinguishment |
— | — | 2,029 | |||||||||
Income (loss) before income tax expense
|
$
|
2,602
|
$
|
2,708
|
$
|
(2,672
|
)
|
Year Ended December 31, 2020 |
Dermatology
Recurring Procedures
|
Dermatology
Procedures Equipment
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
17,409
|
$
|
5,681
|
$
|
23,090
|
||||||
Cost of revenues
|
5,832
|
3,124
|
8,956
|
|||||||||
Gross profit
|
11,577
|
2,557
|
14,134
|
|||||||||
Gross profit %
|
66.5
|
%
|
45.0
|
%
|
61.2
|
%
|
||||||
Allocated expenses:
|
||||||||||||
Engineering and product development
|
1,101
|
173
|
1,274
|
|||||||||
Selling and marketing
|
8,437
|
601
|
9,038
|
|||||||||
Unallocated expenses
|
—
|
—
|
7,898
|
|||||||||
9,538
|
774
|
18,210
|
||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations
|
2,039
|
1,783
|
(4,076
|
)
|
||||||||
Interest expense
|
—
|
—
|
(211
|
)
|
||||||||
Interest income
|
—
|
—
|
150
|
|||||||||
Income (loss) before income tax expense
|
$
|
2,039
|
$
|
1,783
|
$
|
(4,137
|
)
|
The following table presents the Company’s revenue disaggregated by geographical region for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. Domestic
refers to revenue from customers based in the United States, and foreign recurring revenue is derived from the Company’s distributors primarily in Asia.
F-28
Year Ended December 31, 2021
|
Dermatology Recurring Procedures |
Dermatology Procedures Equipment
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Domestic
|
$
|
21,215
|
$
|
1,982
|
$
|
23,197
|
||||||
Foreign
|
1,313
|
5,467
|
6,780
|
|||||||||
Total
|
$
|
22,528
|
$
|
7,449
|
$
|
29,977
|
Year Ended December 31, 2020
|
Dermatology Recurring Procedures |
Dermatology Procedures Equipment
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Domestic
|
$
|
16,848
|
$
|
956
|
$
|
17,804
|
||||||
Foreign
|
561
|
4,725
|
5,286
|
|||||||||
Total
|
$
|
17,409
|
$
|
5,681
|
$
|
23,090
|
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, total assets by reportable segment were as follows:
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2021
|
2020
|
||||||
Assets: | ||||||||
Dermatology recurring procedures
|
$
|
30,897
|
$
|
25,112
|
||||
Dermatology procedures equipment
|
2,662
|
3,052
|
||||||
Other unallocated assets
|
13,034
|
18,614
|
||||||
Consolidated total
|
$
|
46,593
|
$
|
46,778
|
Long-lived assets of $1.0 million
and $0.5 million were located in international markets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, with the remainder located in
domestic markets.
17. Subsequent Events
TheraClear
In January 2022, the Company acquired certain assets related to the TheraClear Devices from Theravant Corporation. The
TheraClear asset acquisition will allow the Company to further develop, commercialize and market the TheraClear Devices that are used for acne treatment, as well as advance the TheraClear technology into multiple other devices that can be used
to treat a range of additional indications.
The Company made an upfront cash payment of $0.5 million and issued to Theravant Corporation 358,367 shares of common
stock with an aggregate value of $0.5 million in connection with the TheraClear asset acquisition. Theravant Corporation is eligible
to receive up to $3.0 million in future earnout payments upon the achievement of certain annual net revenue milestones, up to $20.0 million in future royalty payments based upon gross profit from future domestic sales, 25% of gross profit from international sales over the subsequent four-year
period, and up to $1.0 million in future milestone payments upon the achievement of certain development and related net revenue
targets.
F-29