STRATUS PROPERTIES INC - Quarter Report: 2006 September (Form 10-Q)
| UNITED
                STATES | |||
| SECURITIES
                AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION | |||
| Washington,
                D.C. 20549 | |||
| FORM
                10-Q | |||
| (Mark
                One) | |||
| [X] | QUARTERLY
                REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE | ||
| SECURITIES
                EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |||
| For
                the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 | |||
| OR | |||
| [
                ] | TRANSITION
                REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE | ||
| SECURITIES
                EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |||
| For
                the transition period from | to | ||
| Commission
                File Number: 0-19989 | |||
|  | |||
| Stratus
                Properties Inc. | |||
| (Exact
                name of registrant as specified in its
                charter) | |||
| Delaware | 72-1211572 | 
| (State
                or other jurisdiction of incorporation
                or organization) | (IRS
                Employer Identification No.) | 
| 98
                San Jacinto Blvd., Suite 220 | |
| Austin,
                Texas | 78701 | 
| (Address
                of principal executive offices) | (Zip
                Code) | 
| (512)
                478-5788 | |
| (Registrant's
                telephone number, including area code) | |
Indicate
      by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
      be
      filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
      the
      preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
      to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
      for
      the past 90 days. R
      Yes
ÿ
      No
    Indicate
      by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
      accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
      filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check
      one): Large accelerated filer ÿ  Accelerated
      filer R Non-accelerated
      filer ÿ
    Indicate
      by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
      12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ÿ
      Yes
R
      No
    On
      September 30, 2006, there were issued and outstanding 7,340,394 shares of the
      registrant’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share.
    | STRATUS
                PROPERTIES INC. | |
| Page | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 24 | |
| 24 | |
| 24 | |
| 24 | |
| 24 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 25 | |
| E-1 | |
STRATUS
      PROPERTIES INC.
    
    STRATUS
      PROPERTIES INC.
    CONDENSED
      CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
    (In
      Thousands)
    | September
                30, | December
                31, | |||||
| 2006 | 2005 | |||||
| ASSETS | ||||||
| Current
                assets: | ||||||
| Cash
                and cash equivalents, including restricted cash of | ||||||
| $116
                and $387, respectively | $ | 5,665 | $ | 1,901 | ||
| Accounts
                receivable | 607 | 469 | ||||
| Deposits,
                prepaid expenses and other | 3,832 | 849 | ||||
| Discontinued
                operations | - | 12,230 | ||||
| Total
                current assets | 10,104 | 15,449 | ||||
| Real
                estate, commercial leasing assets and facilities, net: | ||||||
| Property
                held for sale - developed or under development | 96,752 | 127,450 | ||||
| Property
                held for sale - undeveloped | 16,255 | 16,071 | ||||
| Property
                held for use, net | 46,891 | 9,452 | ||||
| Investment
                in Crestview | 3,800 | 3,800 | ||||
| Deferred
                tax asset | 6,468 | - | ||||
| Other
                assets | 7,423 | 1,664 | ||||
| Total
                assets | $ | 187,693 | $ | 173,886 | ||
| LIABILITIES
                AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||
| Current
                liabilities: | ||||||
| Accounts
                payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 8,654 | $ | 6,305 | ||
| Accrued
                interest, property taxes and other | 5,198 | 3,710 | ||||
| Current
                tax liability | 769 | - | ||||
| Current
                portion of long-term debt | 307 | 169 | ||||
| Discontinued
                operations | - | 12,036 | ||||
| Total
                current liabilities | 14,928 | 22,220 | ||||
| Long-term
                debt | 32,444 | 50,135 | ||||
| Other
                liabilities | 7,634 | 7,364 | ||||
| Total
                liabilities | 55,006 | 79,719 | ||||
| Stockholders’
                equity: | ||||||
| Preferred
                stock | - | - | ||||
| Common
                stock | 76 | 74 | ||||
| Capital
                in excess of par value of common stock | 185,500 | 182,007 | ||||
| Accumulated
                deficit | (47,686 | ) | (82,943 | ) | ||
| Unamortized
                value of restricted stock units | - | (567 | ) | |||
| Common
                stock held in treasury | (5,203 | ) | (4,404 | ) | ||
| Total
                stockholders’ equity | 132,687 | 94,167 | ||||
| Total
                liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 187,693 | $ | 173,886 | ||
The
      accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
      statements.
3
        STRATUS
      PROPERTIES INC.
    CONSOLIDATED
      STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)
    (In
      Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
    | Three
                Months Ended | Nine
                Months Ended | |||||||||||
| September
                30, | September
                30, | |||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
| Revenues: | ||||||||||||
| Real
                estate | $ | 7,934 | $ | 11,603 | $ | 50,686 | $ | 20,480 | ||||
| Rental
                income | 1,170 | 364 | 2,433 | 983 | ||||||||
| Commissions,
                management fees and other | 746 | 179 | 1,296 | 589 | ||||||||
| Total
                revenues | 9,850 | 12,146 | 54,415 | 22,052 | ||||||||
| Cost
                of sales: | ||||||||||||
| Real
                estate, net | 5,633 | 7,074 | 24,864 | 13,063 | ||||||||
| Rental | 710 | 378 | 1,612 | 1,060 | ||||||||
| Depreciation | 458 | 193 | 1,043 | 572 | ||||||||
| Total
                cost of sales | 6,801 | 7,645 | 27,519 | 14,695 | ||||||||
| General
                and administrative expenses | 1,583 | 1,112 | 5,205 | 3,538 | ||||||||
| Total
                costs and expenses | 8,384 | 8,757 | 32,724 | 18,233 | ||||||||
| Operating
                income | 1,466 | 3,389 | 21,691 | 3,819 | ||||||||
| Interest
                expense, net | (335 | ) | (129 | ) | (805 | ) | (361 | ) | ||||
| Interest
                income | 122 | 34 | 324 | 91 | ||||||||
| Income
                from continuing operations before | ||||||||||||
| income
                taxes | 1,253 | 3,294 | 21,210 | 3,549 | ||||||||
| Benefit
                from income taxes | 12 | - | 6,431 | - | ||||||||
| Income
                from continuing operations | 1,265 | 3,294 | 27,641 | 3,549 | ||||||||
| (Loss)
                income from discontinued operations  | ||||||||||||
| (including
                a gain on sale of $7,264 in the 2006 | ||||||||||||
| nine-month
                period, net of taxes of $84 in the | ||||||||||||
| third
                quarter of 2006 and $2,498 in the 2006 | ||||||||||||
| nine-month
                period) | (84 | ) | 25 | 7,617 | 178 | |||||||
| Net
                income applicable to common stock | $ | 1,181 | $ | 3,319 | $ | 35,258 | $ | 3,727 | ||||
| Basic
                net income (loss) per share of common stock: | ||||||||||||
| Continuing
                operations | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 3.79 | $ | 0.49 | ||||
| Discontinued
                operations | (0.01 | ) | - | 1.05 | 0.03 | |||||||
| Basic
                net income per share of common stock | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 4.84 | $ | 0.52 | ||||
| Diluted
                net income (loss) per share of common stock: | ||||||||||||
| Continuing
                operations | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 3.61 | $ | 0.47 | ||||
| Discontinued
                operations | (0.01 | ) | - | 0.99 | 0.02 | |||||||
| Diluted
                net income per share of common stock | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 4.60 | $ | 0.49 | ||||
| Average
                shares of common stock outstanding: | ||||||||||||
| Basic | 7,317 | 7,203 | 7,288 | 7,211 | ||||||||
| Diluted | 7,617 | 7,605 | 7,658 | 7,649 | ||||||||
The
      accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
      statements.
4
        STRATUS
      PROPERTIES INC. 
    CONSOLIDATED
      STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
    (In
      Thousands)
    | Nine
                Months Ended | ||||||
| September
                30, | ||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | |||||
| Cash
                flow from operating activities: | ||||||
| Net
                income | $ | 35,258 | $ | 3,727 | ||
| Adjustments
                to reconcile net income to net cash provided by | ||||||
| operating
                activities: | ||||||
| Income
                from discontinued operations | (7,617 | ) | (178 | ) | ||
| Depreciation | 1,043 | 572 | ||||
| Cost
                of real estate sold | 20,112 | 11,157 | ||||
| Deferred
                income taxes | (6,431 | ) | - | |||
| Stock-based
                compensation | 894 | 239 | ||||
| Deposits
                and other | (6,746 | ) | 1,035 | |||
| (Increase)
                decrease in working capital: | ||||||
| Accounts
                receivable and prepaid expenses | (193 | ) | (260 | ) | ||
| Accounts
                payable, accrued liabilities and other | 2,889 | 6,623 | ||||
| Net
                cash provided by continuing operations | 39,209 | 22,915 | ||||
| Net
                cash provided by discontinued operations | 374 | 1,111 | ||||
| Net
                cash provided by operating activities | 39,583 | 24,026 | ||||
| Cash
                flow from investing activities: | ||||||
| Development
                of real estate properties | (12,911 | ) | (29,745 | ) | ||
| Development
                of commercial leasing properties and other expenditures | (16,668 | ) | (232 | ) | ||
| Municipal
                utility district reimbursements | 1,337 | 645 | ||||
| Net
                cash used in continuing operations | (28,242 | ) | (29,332 | ) | ||
| Net
                cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations | 10,022 | (33 | ) | |||
| Net
                cash used in investing activities | (18,220 | ) | (29,365 | ) | ||
| Cash
                flow from financing activities: | ||||||
| Borrowings
                from revolving credit facility | 15,000 | 47,005 | ||||
| Payments
                on revolving credit facility | (30,677 | ) | (45,640 | ) | ||
| Borrowings
                from TIAA mortgage | 22,800 | - | ||||
| Payments
                on TIAA mortgage | (49 | ) | - | |||
| Borrowings
                from project loans | 2,236 | 11,791 | ||||
| Repayments
                on project loans | (26,863 | ) | (4,299 | ) | ||
| Net
                proceeds from exercised stock options | 917 | 747 | ||||
| Purchases
                of Stratus common shares | (542 | ) | (3,307 | ) | ||
| Bank
                credit facility fees | (421 | ) | (283
                 | ) | ||
| Net
                cash (used in) provided by continuing operations | (17,599 | ) | 6,014 | |||
| Net
                cash used in discontinued operations | - | (146 | ) | |||
| Net
                cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (17,599 | ) | 5,868 | |||
| Net
                increase in cash and cash equivalents | 3,764 | 529 | ||||
| Cash
                and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 1,901 | 379 | ||||
| Cash
                and cash equivalents at end of period | 5,665 | 908 | ||||
| Less
                cash at discontinued operations | - | (131 | ) | |||
| Less
                cash restricted as to use | (116 | ) | (119 | ) | ||
| Unrestricted
                cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 5,549 | $ | 658 | ||
The
      accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
      statements.
5
        STRATUS
      PROPERTIES INC.
    
    | 1. | GENERAL | 
The
      accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in
      conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for
      the
      year ended December 31, 2005, included in Stratus Properties Inc.’s (Stratus)
      Annual Report on Form 10-K (Stratus 2005 Form 10-K) filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, the accompanying
      consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only
      of
      normal recurring items) considered necessary to present fairly the financial
      position of Stratus at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, and the results
      of operations for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30,
      2006 and 2005, and cash flows for the nine-month periods ended September 30,
      2006 and 2005. Operating results for the three-month and nine-month periods
      ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that
      may
      be expected for the year ending December 31, 2006. Certain prior year amounts
      have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. A change
      in
      accounting principle applied during 2006 is discussed in Note 2.
    | 2. | STOCK-BASED
                COMPENSATION | 
Accounting
      for Stock-Based Compensation.
      As of
      September 30, 2006, Stratus has three stock-based employee compensation plans
      and one stock-based director compensation plan. Prior to January 1, 2006,
      Stratus accounted for options granted under all of its plans under the
      recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board (APB)
      Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related
      interpretations, as permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
      (SFAS) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” APB Opinion No. 25
      required compensation cost for stock options to be recognized based on the
      difference on the date of grant, if any, between the quoted market price of
      the
      stock and the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock (i.e., the
      intrinsic value). Because all the plans require that the option exercise price
      be at least the market price on the date of grant, Stratus recognized no
      compensation cost on the grant or exercise of its employees’ options through
      December 31, 2005. Other awards of restricted stock units under the plans did
      result in compensation costs being recognized in earnings based on the intrinsic
      value on the date of grant.
    Effective
      January 1, 2006, Stratus adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS
      No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” or “SFAS No. 123R,” using the
      modified prospective transition method. Under that transition method,
      compensation cost recognized in 2006 includes: (a) compensation costs for all
      stock option awards granted to employees prior to, but not yet vested as of
      January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance
      with
      the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, and (b) compensation costs for all
      stock option awards granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the
      grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No.
      123R. In addition, other stock-based awards charged to expense under SFAS No.
      123 (i.e., restricted stock units) continue to be charged to expense under
      SFAS
      No. 123R. Results for prior periods have not been restated. Stratus has elected
      to recognize compensation costs for awards that vest over several years on
      a
      straight-line basis over the vesting period. Stratus’ stock option awards
      provide for employees to receive the next year’s vesting after an employee
      retires. For stock option awards granted after January 1, 2006, to
      retirement-eligible employees, Stratus records one year of amortization of
      the
      awards’ value on the date of grant. In addition, prior to adoption of SFAS No.
      123R, Stratus recognized forfeitures as they occurred in its SFAS No. 123 pro
      forma disclosures. Beginning January 1, 2006, Stratus includes estimated
      forfeitures in its compensation cost and updates the estimated forfeiture rate
      through the final vesting date of the awards.
    As
      a
      result of adopting SFAS No. 123R on January 1, 2006, Stratus’ net income for the
      three months ended September 30, 2006, was $0.1 million ($0.02 per basic and
      diluted share) lower, and Stratus’ net income for the nine months ended
      September 30, 2006, was $0.6 million ($0.08 per basic and diluted share) lower
      than if it had continued to account for share-based compensation under APB
      Opinion No. 25.
    Stock-Based
      Compensation Plans.
      As
      discussed above, Stratus currently has four stock-based compensation plans
      and
      all are shareholder approved. As of September 30, 2006, only three of the plans,
      which are discussed below, have awards available for grant. Stratus’ Stock
      Option Plan, 1998 Stock 
    6
        Option
      Plan, 2002 Stock Incentive Plan and Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors
      (the Plans) provide for the issuance of stock options, restricted stock units
      (see below) and stock appreciations rights (collectively stock-based
      compensation awards), adjusted for the effects of the effective reverse stock
      split transactions (see Note 6 of the Stratus 2005 Form 10-K), representing
      1,330,000 shares of Stratus common stock at no less than market value at time
      of
      grant.
    Generally,
      stock-based compensation awards are exercisable in 25 percent annual increments
      beginning one year from the date of grant and expire 10 years after the date
      of
      grant. Awards for approximately 3,100 shares under the 1998 Stock Option Plan,
      32,500 shares under the Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors and 9,800
      shares under the 2002 Stock Option Plan were available for new grants as of
      September 30, 2006.
    Stock-Based
      Compensation Cost.
      Compensation cost charged against earnings for stock-based awards is shown
      below
      (in thousands). Stock-based compensation costs are capitalized as appropriate,
      but such capitalization was not previously reflected in our pro-forma
      disclosures shown below as amounts were not considered material.
    | Three
                Months Ended | Nine
                Months Ended | ||||||||||||
| September
                30, | September
                30, | ||||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
| Stock
                options awarded to employees (including directors) | $ | 167 | $ | - | $ | 449 | $ | - | |||||
| Stock
                options awarded to nonemployees | - | 25 | 2 | 34 | |||||||||
| Restricted
                stock units | 111 | 68 | 681 | 205 | |||||||||
| Less
                capitalized amounts | (63 | ) | - | (238 | ) | - | |||||||
| Impact
                on net income | $ | 215 | $ | 93 | $ | 894 | $ | 239 | |||||
The
      following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share
      for
      the three months ended September 30, 2005 and the nine months ended September
      30, 2005, if Stratus had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS
      No. 123 to stock-based awards granted under Stratus’ stock-based compensation
      plans (in thousands, except per share amounts):
    | Three
                Months Ended | Nine
                Months Ended | |||||
| September
                30, 2005 | September
                30, 2005 | |||||
| Net
                income applicable to common stock, as reported | $ | 3,319 | $ | 3,727 | ||
| Add:
                Stock-based employee compensation expense | ||||||
| included
                in reported net income applicable to common | ||||||
| stock
                for restricted stock units | 68 | 205 | ||||
| Deduct:
                Total stock-based employee compensation | ||||||
| expense
                determined under fair value-based method | ||||||
| for
                all awards | (234 | ) | (700 | ) | ||
| Pro
                forma net income applicable to common stock | $ | 3,153 | $ | 3,232 | ||
| Earnings
                per share: | ||||||
| Basic
                - as reported | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.52 | ||
| Basic
                - pro forma | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.45 | ||
| Diluted
                - as reported | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.49 | ||
| Diluted
                - pro forma | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.43 | ||
For
      the
      pro forma computations, the values of option grants were calculated on the
      dates
      of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and amortized to expense
      on a straight-line basis over the options’ vesting periods. No other discounts
      or restrictions related to vesting or the likelihood of vesting of stock options
      were applied. The following table summarizes the calculated fair value and
      assumptions used to determine the fair value of Stratus’ stock option grants
      under SFAS No. 123 during the three-month and nine-month periods ended September
      30, 2005.
    | Options
                granted | 7,500 | ||
| Fair
                value per stock option | $ | 11.48 | |
| Risk-free
                interest rate | 4.33 | % | |
| Expected
                volatility rate | 46.2 | % | |
| Expected
                life of options (in years) | 10.0 | 
Options.
      A
      summary of options outstanding as of September 30, 2006 and changes during
      the
      nine months ended September 30, 2006 follow:
    | Weighted | ||||||||||
| Average | Aggregate | |||||||||
| Weighted | Remaining | Intrinsic | ||||||||
| Number
                of | Average | Contractual | Value | |||||||
| Options | Option
                Price | Term
                (years) | ($000) | |||||||
| Balance
                at January 1 | 838,336 | $ | 10.11 | |||||||
| Granted | 7,500 | 26.44 | ||||||||
| Exercised | (150,194 | ) | 7.82 | |||||||
| Expired/Forfeited | - | - | ||||||||
| Balance
                at September 30 | 695,642 | 10.78 | 4.46 | $ | 15,014 | |||||
| Vested
                and exercisable at September 30 | 546,767 | 9.74 | 3.52 | $ | 12,367 | |||||
The
      fair
      value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a
      Black-Scholes option valuation model. Expected volatility is based on the
      historical volatility of Stratus’ stock. Stratus uses historical data to
      estimate option exercise, forfeitures and expected life of the options. When
      appropriate, employees who have similar historical exercise behavior are grouped
      for valuation purposes. The risk-free interest rate is based on Federal Reserve
      rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of
      the
      option at the date of grant. Stratus has not paid, and has no current plan
      to
      pay, cash dividends on its common stock. The following table summarizes the
      calculated fair value and assumptions used to determine the fair value of
      Stratus’ stock option awards during the nine-month period ended September 30,
      2006.
    | Options
                granted | 7,500 | |||
| Grant-date
                fair value per stock option | $ | 14.57 | ||
| Expected
                and weighted average volatility | 48.6 | % | ||
| Expected
                life of options (in years) | 6.7 | |||
| Risk-free
                interest rate | 4.7 | % | 
The
      total
      intrinsic value of options exercised during the nine months ended September
      30,
      2006, was $2.6 million. During the first nine months of 2006, approximately
      23,900 stock options with a weighted-average grant-date fair market value of
      $6.65 vested. As of September 30, 2006, there were approximately 148,900 stock
      options unvested with a weighted-average grant-date fair market value of $9.38.
      As of September 30, 2006, Stratus had $1.0 million of total unrecognized
      compensation cost related to unvested stock options expected to be recognized
      over a weighted average period of 1.1 years.
    The
      following table includes amounts related to exercises of stock options and
      vesting of restricted stock units during the first nine months of 2006 (in
      thousands, except Stratus shares tendered):
8
        | Stratus
                shares tendered to pay the exercise price | |||
| and/or
                the minimum required taxesa | 4,162 | ||
| Cash
                received from stock option exercises | $ | 1,034 | |
| Actual
                tax benefit realized for the tax deductions | |||
| from
                stock option exercises | $ | 946 | |
| Amounts
                Stratus paid for employee taxes related | |||
| to
                stock option exercises | $ | 117 | |
| a. | Under
                terms of the related plans, upon exercise of stock options and vesting
                of
                restricted stock units, employees may tender Stratus shares to Stratus
                to
                pay the exercise price and/or the minimum required
                taxes. | 
Restricted
      Stock Units.
      Under
      Stratus’ restricted stock program, shares of its common stock may be granted to
      certain officers of Stratus at no cost. The restricted stock units are converted
      into shares of Stratus common stock ratably on the anniversary of each award
      over the vesting period, generally four years. The awards fully vest upon
      retirement. Fair value for restricted stock unit awards is based on the average
      of the high and low Stratus common stock price on the date of
      grant.
    Stratus
      granted 49,000 restricted stock units in the first nine months of 2006. A
      summary of outstanding unvested restricted stock units as of September 30,
      2006,
      and activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 is presented
      below:
    | Weighted | |||||||
| Average | Aggregate | ||||||
| Number
                of | Remaining | Intrinsic | |||||
| Restricted | Contractual | Value | |||||
| Stock
                Units | Term
                (years) | ($000) | |||||
| Balance
                at January 1 | 45,045 | ||||||
| Granted | 49,000 | ||||||
| Vested | (4,545 | ) | |||||
| Forfeited | - | ||||||
| Balance
                at September 30 | 89,500 | 1.4 | $ | 2,896 | |||
The
      grant-date fair value of restricted stock units granted during the first nine
      months of 2006 was $1.2 million. The total intrinsic value of restricted stock
      units vesting during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, was $0.1 million.
      As of September 30, 2006, Stratus had $1.0 million of total unrecognized
      compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock units expected to be
      recognized over a weighted average period of 1.4 years.
    | 3. | EARNINGS
                PER SHARE | 
Stratus’
      basic net income per share of common stock was calculated by dividing the income
      applicable to continuing operations, income from discontinued operations and
      net
      income applicable to common stock by the weighted average number of common
      shares outstanding during the period. The following is a reconciliation of
      net
      income and weighted average common shares outstanding for purposes of
      calculating diluted net income per share (in thousands, except per share
      amounts):
9
        | Three
                Months Ended | Nine
                Months Ended | |||||||||||
| September
                30, | September
                30, | |||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
| Net
                income from continuing operations | $ | 1,265 | $ | 3,294 | $ | 27,641 | $ | 3,549 | ||||
| (Loss)
                income from discontinued operations | (84 | ) | 25 | 7,617 | 178 | |||||||
| Net
                income applicable to common stock | $ | 1,181 | $ | 3,319 | $ | 35,258 | $ | 3,727 | ||||
| Weighted
                average common shares outstanding | 7,317 | 7,203 | 7,288 | 7,211 | ||||||||
| Add:  
                Dilutive stock options | 271 | 375 | 330 | 418 | ||||||||
| Restricted
                stock | 29 | 27 | 40 | 20 | ||||||||
| Weighted
                average common shares outstanding for | ||||||||||||
| purposes
                of calculating diluted net income per share | 7,617 | 7,605 | 7,658 | 7,649 | ||||||||
| Diluted
                net income (loss) per share of common stock: | ||||||||||||
| Continuing
                operations | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 3.61 | $ | 0.47 | ||||
| Discontinued
                operations | (0.01 | ) | - | 0.99 | 0.02 | |||||||
| Diluted
                net income per share of common stock | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 4.60 | $ | 0.49 | ||||
| 4. | DEBT | 
In
      June
      2006, Stratus entered into a 30-year, $22.8 million mortgage with a 10-year
      balloon payment from Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America
      (TIAA). Proceeds from the mortgage were used to repay outstanding amounts under
      Stratus’ Escarpment Village shopping center project loan and other outstanding
      debt balances. The annual interest rate on the mortgage is 5.55 percent. The
      Escarpment Village shopping center and the related lease agreements are security
      for the loan.
    In
      May
      2006, Stratus entered into a modification and extension agreement to extend
      the
      maturity and decrease the interest rate on its Comerica revolving credit
      facility. The maturity date was extended from May 30, 2007 to May 30, 2008
      and
      interest accrues, at Stratus’ option, at Comerica’s rate minus 0.8 percent or
      one-month London Interbank Offered Rate plus 1.95 percent, subject to a minimum
      annual rate of 5.0 percent. The available commitment of $45 million and other
      conditions and security remain unchanged.
    | 5. | RESTRICTED
                CASH AND INTEREST COST | 
Restricted
      Cash.
      Restricted cash includes approximately $0.1 million held at September 30, 2006
      and December 31, 2005, representing funds held for payment of fractional shares
      resulting from the May 2001 stock split (see Note 6 of the Stratus 2005 Form
      10-K). Restricted cash at December 31, 2005 also included $0.3 million from
      Deerfield lot sales to be used for payment on the Deerfield loan.
    Interest
      Cost.
      Interest
      expense excludes capitalized interest of $0.3 million in the third quarter
      of
      2006, $0.9 million in the third quarter of 2005, $1.7 million in the first
      nine
      months of 2006 and $2.2 million in the first nine months of 2005.
    | 6. | DISCONTINUED
                OPERATIONS | 
In
      the
      fourth quarter of 2005, Stratus committed to a plan to sell its office buildings
      at 7000 West. On March 27, 2006, Stratus’ wholly owned subsidiary, Stratus 7000
      West Joint Venture (7000 West JV), sold its two
      70,000-square-foot
      office buildings at 7000 West William Cannon Drive (7000 West), known as the
      Lantana Corporate Center, to
      CarrAmerica for
      $22.3
      million, resulting in a gain of $9.8 million ($7.3 million net of taxes or
      $1.00
      per basic share and $0.95 per diluted share) in the first nine months of 2006.
      CarrAmerica
      paid $10.6 million cash to Stratus at closing and assumed the $11.7 million
      principal balance remaining under Stratus’ 7000 West project loan from TIAA. In
      connection with CarrAmerica’s assumption of the loan, 7000 West JV entered into
      a First Modification Agreement with CarrAmerica and TIAA under which TIAA
      released 7000 West JV’s $3.5 million letter of credit issued by Comerica Bank
      that secured certain re-tenanting obligations and released 7000 West JV from
      all
      future obligations under the loan. In addition, TIAA released Stratus from
      all
      future liabilities under its guaranty of 7000 West JV’s environmental
      representations and recourse obligations under the loan.
    10
        Upon
      completion of the sale of 7000 West, Stratus ceased all involvement with the
      7000 West office buildings. The operations, assets and liabilities of 7000
      West
      represented a component of Stratus’ commercial leasing segment.
    The
      table
      below provides a summary of 7000 West’s results of operations (in
      thousands):
    | Three
                Months Ended | Nine
                Months Ended | ||||||||||||
| September
                30, | September
                30, | ||||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
| Rental
                income | $ | - | $ | 859 | $ | 1,057 | $ | 2,625 | |||||
| Rental
                property costs | - | (349 | ) | (403 | ) | (987 | ) | ||||||
| Depreciation | - | (229 | ) | - | (687 | ) | |||||||
| General
                and administrative expenses | - | (74 | ) | (48 | ) | (225 | ) | ||||||
| Interest
                expensea | - | (182 | ) | (168 | ) | (548 | ) | ||||||
| Interest
                income | - | - | 2 | - | |||||||||
| Gain
                on sale | - | - | 9,762 | - | |||||||||
| Provision
                for income taxes | (84 | )b | - | (2,585 | ) | - | |||||||
| (Loss)
                income from discontinued operations | $ | (84 | ) | $ | 25 | $ | 7,617 | $ | 178 | ||||
| a. | Relates
                to interest expense from 7000 West project loan (see below) and does
                not
                include any additional allocations of
                interest. | 
| b. | Reflects
                the allocation of Stratus’ third-quarter tax provision to discontinued
                operations in accordance with income tax accounting
                rules. | 
The
      following summarizes 7000 West’s net assets (in thousands) at December 31,
      2005:
    | Assets: | ||||
| Cash
                and cash equivalents | $ | 5 | ||
| Other
                current assets | 1,136 | |||
| Property
                held for sale, net of accumulated depreciation | ||||
| of
                $4,577 | 11,089 | |||
| Liabilities: | ||||
| Current
                portion of long-term debt | (11,795 | ) | ||
| Other
                current liabilities | (241 | ) | ||
| Net
                assets | $ | 194 | ||
| 7. | BUSINESS
                SEGMENTS | 
Stratus
      has two operating segments, “Real Estate Operations” and “Commercial Leasing.”
The Real Estate Operations segment is comprised of all Stratus’ developed
      properties, properties under development and undeveloped properties in Austin,
      Texas, which consist of its properties in the Barton Creek community, the Circle
      C community and Lantana. In addition, the Deerfield property in Plano, Texas
      is
      included in the Real Estate Operations segment.
    The
      Commercial Leasing segment includes two office buildings at 7500 Rialto
      Boulevard and the Escarpment Village project. The first 75,000-square-foot
      building at 7500 Rialto Boulevard is approximately 96 percent leased. The second
      75,000-square-foot building opened in September 2006 and is approximately 50
      percent leased. Southwest Property Services L.L.C., which Stratus formed in
      2004, manages these office buildings. For the 2006 periods, the Commercial
      Leasing segment also includes Escarpment Village, a 168,000-square-foot retail
      project anchored by a grocery store. Rental income from Escarpment Village
      totaled $0.8 million in the third quarter of 2006 and $1.3 million in the first
      nine months of 2006 (including less than $0.1 million in the first quarter).
      In
      the fourth quarter of 2005, Stratus committed to sell the two 70,000-square-foot
      office buildings at 7000 West and completed the sale on March 27, 2006. The
      7000
      West operating results are reported as discontinued operations in the table
      below.
    11
        As
      of
      September 30, 2006, Stratus’ minimum rental income which includes scheduled rent
      increases, under noncancelable long-term leases which extend to 2026, totaled
      $0.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2006, $4.3 million in 2007, $4.4 million
      in 2008, $4.2 million in 2009, $3.8 million in 2010 and $32.1 million
      thereafter.
    Stratus’
      lease agreement with the anchor tenant of Escarpment Village and its contract
      with Trammell Crow Central Texas, Ltd. (Trammell Crow), the firm managing
      Escarpment Village, contain provisions requiring Stratus to share the net
      profits from a sale of the project. The anchor tenant and Trammell Crow are
      each
      entitled to 10 percent of any net profit from a sale of Escarpment Village
      after
      Stratus receives a 12 percent return on its investment. Stratus is required
      to
      pay the anchor tenant its net profits interest upon a sale of the project,
      but
      no later than May 2007. Stratus is required to pay Trammell Crow its net profits
      interest upon a sale of the project, but no later than May 2008. If the project
      is not sold prior to either payment deadline, then the net profits calculation
      will be made based upon a hypothetical sale at fair market value. As of
      September 30, 2006, Stratus estimates these net profit payments will total
      $0.9
      million. This amount was recorded in other assets and is being amortized over
      the tenant’s lease term (20 years) as a reduction of rental income. The actual
      payments may vary from this amount and will be based on the actual sale price
      of
      Escarpment Village or the estimated fair value of Escarpment Village, as
      applicable.
    The
      segment data presented below were prepared on the same basis as Stratus’
consolidated financial statements.
    | Real
                Estate Operationsa | Commercial
                Leasing | Other | Total | |||||||||
| (In
                Thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Three
                Months Ended September 30, 2006 | ||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 8,680 | $ | 1,170 | $ | - | $ | 9,850 | ||||
| Cost
                of sales, excluding depreciation | (5,633 | ) | (710 | ) | - | (6,343 | ) | |||||
| Depreciation | (29 | ) | (429 | ) | - | (458 | ) | |||||
| General
                and administrative expenses | (1,425 | ) | (158 | ) | - | (1,583 | ) | |||||
| Operating
                income (loss) | $ | 1,593 | $ | (127
                 | ) | $ | - | $ | 1,466 | |||
| Loss
                from discontinued operations | $ | - | $ | (84 | ) | $ | - | $ | (84 | ) | ||
| Benefit
                from income taxes | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 12 | $ | 12 | ||||
| Capital
                expenditures | $ | 6,326 | $ | 3,375 | $ | - | $ | 9,701 | ||||
| Total
                assets | $ | 124,481 | $ | 56,744 | $ | 6,468 | b | $ | 187,693 | |||
| Three
                Months Ended September 30, 2005 | ||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 11,782 | $ | 364 | $ | - | $ | 12,146 | ||||
| Cost
                of sales, excluding depreciation | (7,074 | ) | (378 | ) | - | (7,452 | ) | |||||
| Depreciation | (37 | ) | (156 | ) | - | (193 | ) | |||||
| General
                and administrative expense | (970 | ) | (142 | ) | - | (1,112 | ) | |||||
| Operating
                income (loss) | $ | 3,701 | $ | (312 | ) | $ | - | $ | 3,389 | |||
| Income
                from discontinued operations | $ | - | $ | 25 | $ | - | $ | 25 | ||||
| Capital
                expenditures | $ | 10,847 | $ | 43 | $ | - | $ | 10,890 | ||||
| Total
                assets | $ | 144,266 | $ | 25,134 | c | $ | - | $ | 169,400 | |||
| Nine
                Months Ended September 30, 2006 | ||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 51,982 | $ | 2,433 | $ | - | $ | 54,415 | ||||
| Cost
                of sales, excluding depreciation | (24,864 | ) | (1,612 | ) | - | (26,476 | ) | |||||
| Depreciation | (96 | ) | (947 | ) | - | (1,043 | ) | |||||
| General
                and administrative expenses | (4,728 | ) | (477 | ) | - | (5,205 | ) | |||||
| Operating
                income (loss) | $ | 22,294 | $ | (603
                 | ) | $ | - | $ | 21,691 | |||
| Income
                from discontinued operations | $ | - | $ | 7,617 | d | $ | - | $ | 7,617 | |||
| Benefit
                from income taxes | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 6,431 | b | $ | 6,431 | |||
| Capital
                expenditures | $ | 12,911 | $ | 16,668 | $ | - | $ | 29,579 | ||||
| Real
                Estate Operationsa | Commercial
                Leasing | Other | Total | |||||||||
| (In
                Thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Nine
                Months Ended September 30, 2005 | ||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 21,069 | $ | 983 | $ | - | $ | 22,052 | ||||
| Cost
                of sales, excluding depreciation | (13,063 | ) | (1,060 | ) | - | (14,123 | ) | |||||
| Depreciation | (112 | ) | (460 | ) | - | (572 | ) | |||||
| General
                and administrative expense | (3,074 | ) | (464 | ) | - | (3,538 | ) | |||||
| Operating
                income (loss) | $ | 4,820 | $ | (1,001 | ) | $ | - | $ | 3,819 | |||
| Income
                from discontinued operations | $ | - | $ | 178 | $ | - | $ | 178 | ||||
| Capital
                expenditures | $ | 29,745 | $ | 265 | $ | - | $ | 30,010 | ||||
| a. | Includes
                sales commissions, management fees and other revenues together with
                related expenses. | 
| b. | Includes
                deferred tax assets resulting from the reversal of a portion of Stratus’
                deferred tax asset valuation allowance which was recorded as a benefit
                from income taxes (see Note 8). | 
| c. | Includes
                assets from the discontinued operations of 7000 West, which Stratus
                sold
                on March 27, 2006, totaling $12.3 million, net of accumulated depreciation
                of $4.6 million, at September 30, 2005. These buildings represented
                two of
                Stratus’ three commercial leasing properties as of September 30,
                2005. | 
| d. | Includes
                a $7.3 million gain, net of taxes of $2.5 million, on the sale of
                7000
                West. | 
| 8. | INCOME
                TAXES | 
Stratus’
      deferred tax assets at December 31, 2005 totaled $17.6 million and Stratus
      had
      provided a 100 percent valuation allowance because realization of the deferred
      tax assets was not considered likely. Realization of Stratus’ deferred tax
      assets is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income within the
      carryforward period available under tax law. In the first quarter of 2006,
      Stratus sold 7000 West (see Note 6) and in April 2006 Stratus completed the
      sale
      of 58 acres at its Lantana property. These transactions generated pre-tax income
      of $25.6 million and along with Stratus’ current homebuilder contract
      arrangements and projected levels of future sales provide sufficient evidence
      that Stratus now believes it is more likely than not that it will be able to
      realize all of its deferred tax assets. As a result, first-quarter 2006 net
      income from continuing operations included a $6.4 million, $0.88 per basic
      share
      and $0.83 per diluted share, tax benefit resulting from the reversal of a
      portion of Stratus’ deferred tax asset valuation allowance and the remaining
      balance of its valuation allowance is being realized in Stratus’ 2006 effective
      tax rate. Stratus recorded an income tax provision of $84,000 in the third
      quarter of 2006 which was allocated to discontinued operations in accordance
      with income tax accounting rules.
    In
      May
      2006, the Texas governor signed into law the Texas Revised Franchise Bill (the
      Franchise Tax). The Franchise Tax replaces current taxable capital and earned
      surplus components with a tax based on “taxable margin.” Taxable margin is
      defined as the entity’s total revenues less either cost of goods sold or
      compensation. Stratus’ income tax benefit from continuing operations for the
      first nine months of 2006 includes a deferred tax credit of $45,000 related
      to
      the Franchise Tax.
    Accounting
      for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.
      In June
      2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 48,
      “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the
      accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold
      a
      tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial
      statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement,
      classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
      disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for the first fiscal year
      beginning after December 15, 2006. Stratus is reviewing the provisions of FIN
      48
      and has not yet determined the impact of adoption.
    
    
    The
      financial information as of September 30, 2006, and for each of the three-month
      and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, included in Part
      I of
      this Form 10-Q pursuant to Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X has been reviewed by
      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PricewaterhouseCoopers), Stratus’ independent
      registered public accounting firm, in accordance with the standards of the
      Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
      PricewaterhouseCoopers’ report is included in this quarterly
      report.
    PricewaterhouseCoopers
      does not carry out significant or additional procedures beyond those that would
      have been necessary if its report had not been included in this quarterly
      report. Accordingly, such report is not a “report” or “part of a registration
      statement” within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Securities Act of 1933
      and the liability provisions of Section 11 of such Act do not
      apply.
    REPORT
      OF
      INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
    To
      the
      Board of Directors and Stockholders
    of
      Stratus Properties Inc.:
    We
      have
      reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Stratus
      Properties Inc. and its subsidiaries as of September 30, 2006, and the related
      consolidated statements of income for each of the three-month and nine-month
      periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, and the consolidated statements
      of
      cash flows for each of the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and
      2005.
      These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
      management.
    We
      conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
      Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial
      information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making
      inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is
      substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the
      standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of
      which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken
      as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
    Based
      on
      our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made
      to the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements for
      them
      to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
      States of America.
    We
      have
      previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
      Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet
      as of
      December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, of changes
      in stockholders’ equity and of cash flows for the year then ended, management’s
      assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
      reporting as of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of the Company’s
      internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005; and in our
      report dated March 16, 2006, we expressed unqualified opinions thereon. The
      consolidated financial statements and management’s assessment of the
      effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting referred to above
      are
      not presented herein. In our opinion, the information set forth in the
      accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005,
      is
      fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated balance
      sheet from which it has been derived.
    As
      discussed in Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements,
      effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
      Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based
      Payment.
    /s/
      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
    Austin,
      Texas
    November
      9, 2006
14
        OVERVIEW
    Management’s
      discussion and analysis presented below should be read in conjunction with
      our
      discussion and analysis of financial results contained in our 2005 Annual Report
      on Form 10-K (2005 Form 10-K). The operating results summarized in this report
      are not necessarily indicative of our future operating results. All subsequent
      references to Notes refer to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, unless
      otherwise stated. Per share amounts are on a diluted basis unless otherwise
      noted.
    We
      are
      engaged in the acquisition, development, management and sale of commercial,
      multi-family and residential real estate properties located primarily in the
      Austin, Texas area. We conduct real estate operations on properties we
      own.
    Our
      principal real estate holdings are currently in southwest Austin, Texas. As
      of
      September 30, 2006, our most significant holding is the 1,728 acres of
      residential, multi-family and commercial property and 42 developed residential
      estate lots located within the Barton Creek community. We also own approximately
      384 acres of undeveloped residential, commercial and multi-family property
      and
      36 acres of commercial property under development within the Circle C Ranch
      (Circle C) community. Our other properties in the Circle C community include
      Meridian, which is an 800-lot residential development, and Escarpment Village,
      which is a 168,000-square-foot retail center anchored by a grocery store. At
      September 30, 2006, Meridian consisted of approximately 282 acres and 121
      developed residential lots. Our remaining Austin holdings at September 30,
      2006,
      consisted of 223 acres of commercial property and two 75,000-square-foot office
      buildings at 7500 Rialto Boulevard, one of which is approximately 96 percent
      leased and the other is approximately 50 percent leased, located within Lantana.
      In the fourth quarter of 2005, we decided to sell our two 70,000-square-foot
      office buildings at 7000 West William Cannon Drive (7000 West), known as the
      Lantana Corporate Center. On March 27, 2006, we sold 7000 West for $22.3 million
      (see Note 6 and “Discontinued Operations - 7000 West”).
    In
      January 2004, we acquired approximately 68 acres of land in Plano, Texas, which
      we refer to as Deerfield. At September 30, 2006, our Deerfield property consists
      of approximately 26 acres of residential land, which is being developed, and
      14
      developed residential lots. We also own two acres of undeveloped commercial
      property in San Antonio, Texas.
    In
      November 2005, we formed a joint venture partnership with Trammell Crow Central
      Texas Development, Inc. (Trammell Crow) to acquire an approximate 74-acre tract
      at the intersection of Airport Boulevard and Lamar Boulevard in Austin, Texas
      for $7.7 million. We refer to the property as the Crestview Station project,
      a
      single-family, multi-family, retail and office development. With our joint
      venture partner, we have commenced brown field remediation and permitting of
      the
      property. Trammell Crow is also managing Escarpment Village for us.
    DEVELOPMENT
      AND OTHER ACTIVITIES
    Lantana.
      In April
      2006, we sold a 58-acre tract at Lantana to Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NYSE:
      AMD) for $21.2 million, recognizing a second-quarter 2006 gain of $15.6 million
      to net income or $2.04 per share on the sale. Lantana is a partially developed,
      mixed-use project with remaining Stratus entitlements for approximately 1.9
      million square feet of office and retail use on 223 acres. Regional utility
      and
      road infrastructure is in place with capacity to serve Lantana at full build-out
      permitted under Stratus’ existing entitlements.
    In
      2001,
      we reached agreement with the City concerning development of a 417-acre portion
      of the Lantana community. The agreement reflected a cooperative effort between
      the City and us to allow development based on grandfathered entitlements, while
      adhering to stringent water quality standards and other enhancements to protect
      the environment. With this agreement, we completed the core entitlement process
      for the entire Lantana project allowing for approximately 2.9 million square
      feet of office and retail development, approximately 400 multi-family units
      (previously sold to an unrelated third party), and a tract for approximately
      330
      residential lots which we sold in 2003.
15
        In September 2006, we completed a second 75,000-square-foot office building at 7500 Rialto Boulevard in response to increased demand for office space within Lantana. As of September 30, 2006, Stratus had leased approximately 50 percent of the space at the second office building and approximately 96 percent of the original office building. In the fourth quarter of 2005, we committed to a plan to sell our two office buildings at 7000 West. On March 27, 2006, we sold 7000 West for $22.3 million (see Note 6 and “Discontinued Operations - 7000 West”).
Barton
      Creek Community.
      We
      commenced construction of a new subdivision within the Barton Creek community
      during the fourth quarter of 2000. This subdivision, Mirador, was completed
      in
      late-2001. Mirador adjoins the Escala Drive subdivision. We developed 34 estate
      lots in the Mirador subdivision, with each lot averaging approximately 3.5
      acres
      in size.
    Since
      January 2002, we have secured subdivision plat approval for three new
      residential subdivisions within the Barton Creek Community, including: Versant
      Place - 54 lots, Wimberly Lane Phase II - 47 lots and Calera - 155 lots. At
      September 30, 2006, our remaining unsold developed lots within the Barton Creek
      Community included: Calera Drive - 11 lots, Wimberly Lane Phase II - 16 lots,
      Calera Court - 8 lots, Mirador - 6 lots and Escala - 1 lot. Development of
      the
      remaining Barton Creek property is expected to occur over several
      years.
    In
      May
      2004, we entered into a contract with a national homebuilder to sell 41 lots
      within the Wimberly Lane Phase II subdivision in the Barton Creek community.
      In
      June 2004, the homebuilder paid us a non-refundable $0.6 million deposit for
      the
      right to purchase the 41 lots. The deposit was used to pay ongoing development
      costs of the lots. The deposit will be applied against subsequent purchases
      of
      lots by the homebuilder after certain thresholds are achieved and will be
      recognized as income as lots are sold. The lots are being sold on a scheduled
      takedown basis, with the initial six lots sold in December 2004 following
      completion of subdivision utilities, and then an average of three lots per
      quarter beginning in June 2005. The average purchase price for each of the
      41
      lots is $150,400, subject to a six percent annual escalator commencing in
      December 2004. The Wimberly Lane Phase II subdivision also included six estate
      lots, each averaging approximately five acres, which we retained, marketed
      and
      sold in 2005 for a total of $1.8 million.
    During
      2004, we completed construction of four courtyard homes at Calera Court within
      the Barton Creek community. Calera Court, the initial phase of the “Calera”
subdivision, will include 16 courtyard homes on 16 acres. The second phase
      of
      Calera, Calera Drive, consisting of 53 single-family lots, many of which adjoin
      the Fazio Canyons Golf Course, received final plat and construction permit
      approval in 2005. In the third quarter of 2005, development of these lots was
      completed and the initial five lots were sold for $2.1 million. Development
      of
      the third and last phase of Calera, which will include approximately 70
      single-family lots, is expected to commence by the end of 2006.
    Circle
      C Community. We
      have
      commenced development activities at the Circle C community based on the
      entitlements secured in our Circle C settlement with the City. Our Circle C
      settlement, as amended in 2004, permits development of 1.16 million square
      feet
      of commercial space, 504 multi-family units and 830 single-family residential
      lots. The preliminary plan has been approved for Meridian, an 800-lot
      residential development at the Circle C community. In October 2004, we received
      final City plat and construction permit approvals for the first phase of
      Meridian, and construction commenced in January 2005. During the first quarter
      of 2005, we contracted to sell a total of 494 lots in our Meridian project
      to
      three national homebuilders in four phases. Sales for each of the four phases
      commence upon substantial completion of development for that phase, and continue
      every quarter until all of the lots have been sold. The first phase, which
      includes 134 lots, was substantially completed at the end of 2005. Development
      of the second phase of 134 lots commenced in the third quarter of 2005 and
      was
      substantially completed in March 2006. We estimate our sales from the first
      two
      phases of Meridian will total at least 35 lots for $2.1 million during the
      fourth quarter of 2006.
16
        The
      grand
      opening of Escarpment Village, a 168,000-square-foot retail project anchored
      by
      a grocery store at the Circle C community, was in May 2006. As of September
      30,
      2006, we had leases for 156,000 square feet or 93 percent of the space at
      Escarpment Village.
    Deerfield.
      In
      January 2004, we acquired the Deerfield property in Plano, Texas, for $7.0
      million. The property was zoned and subject to a preliminary subdivision plan
      for 234 residential lots. In February 2004, we executed an Option Agreement
      and
      a Construction Agreement with a national homebuilder. Pursuant to the Option
      Agreement, the homebuilder paid us $1.4 million for an option to purchase all
      234 lots over 36 monthly take-downs. The net purchase price for each of the
      234
      lots was $61,500, subject to certain terms and conditions. The $1.4 million
      option payment is non-refundable, but will be applied against subsequent
      purchases of lots by the homebuilder after certain thresholds are achieved
      and
      will be recognized by us as income as lots are sold. The Construction Agreement
      requires the homebuilder to complete development of the entire project by March
      15, 2007. We agreed to pay up to $5.2 million of the homebuilder’s development
      costs. The homebuilder must pay all property taxes and maintenance costs. In
      February 2004, we entered into a $9.8 million three-year loan agreement with
      Comerica Bank (Comerica) to finance the acquisition and development of
      Deerfield. Development is proceeding on schedule and we had no amounts
      outstanding under the loan at September 30, 2006. The initial lot sale occurred
      in November 2004 and subsequent lot sales are on schedule. In October 2005,
      we
      executed a revised agreement with the homebuilder, increasing the lot sizes
      and
      average purchase price to $67,150 based on a new total of 224 lots. We expect
      to
      complete 15 lot sales for $1.0 million during the fourth quarter of
      2006.
    Crestview
      Station.
      In
      November 2005, we formed a joint venture partnership with Trammell Crow to
      acquire an approximate 74-acre tract at the intersection of Airport Boulevard
      and Lamar Boulevard in Austin, Texas, for $7.7 million. With our joint venture
      partner, we have commenced brown field remediation and permitting of the
      property, known as the Crestview Station project, which is located on the
      commuter rail line recently approved by City of Austin voters. Crestview Station
      is planned for single-family, multi-family, retail and office development,
      with
      closings on the single-family and multi-family components expected to occur
      in
      2007 upon completion of the remediation. At September 30, 2006, our investment
      in the Crestview Station project totaled $3.8 million and the joint venture
      partnership had $7.4 million of outstanding debt, of which each joint venture
      partner guarantees $1.9 million.
    The
      Crestview Station property is divided into three distinct parcels - one
      containing approximately 46 acres, a second consisting of approximately 27
      acres, and a third 0.5-acre tract. Our joint venture partnership has contracted
      with a nationally recognized remediation firm to demolish the existing buildings
      and remediate the 27-acre and 0.5-acre tracts in preparation for residential
      permitting. Under the terms of the remediation contract, the joint venture
      partnership will pay the contractor approximately $4.9 million upon completion
      of performance benchmarks and certification by the State of Texas that the
      remediation is complete. The contractor is required to pay all costs associated
      with the remediation and to secure an environmental liability policy with $10.0
      million of coverage remaining in place for a 10-year term. Pursuant to the
      agreement with the contractor, all environmental and legal liability was
      assigned to and assumed by the contractor effective November 30,
      2005.
    Downtown
      Austin Project.
      In April
      2005, the City selected our proposal to develop a mixed-use project in downtown
      Austin immediately north of the new City Hall complex. The project includes
      an
      entire city block and is suitable for a mixture of retail, office, hotel,
      residential and civic uses. We have entered into negotiations with the City
      to
      reach agreement on the project’s design and transaction terms and structure. As
      of September 30, 2006, we had deferred $2.6 million of costs related to this
      project.
    RESULTS
      OF OPERATIONS
    We
      are
      continually evaluating the development potential of our properties and will
      continue to consider opportunities to enter into significant transactions
      involving our properties. As a result, and because of numerous other factors
      affecting our business activities as described herein, our past operating
      results are not necessarily indicative of our future results.
17
        Summary
      operating results follow (in thousands):
    | Third
                Quarter | Nine
                Months | |||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
| Revenues: | ||||||||||||
| Real
                estate operations | $ | 8,680 | $ | 11,782 | $ | 51,982 | $ | 21,069 | ||||
| Commercial
                leasing | 1,170 | 364 | 2,433 | 983 | ||||||||
| Total
                revenues | $ | 9,850 | $ | 12,146 | $ | 54,415 | $ | 22,052 | ||||
| Operating
                income | $ | 1,466 | $ | 3,389 | $ | 21,691 | $ | 3,819 | ||||
| Benefit
                from income taxes | $ | 12 | $ | - | $ | 6,431 | $ | - | ||||
| Net
                income from | ||||||||||||
| continuing
                operations | $ | 1,265 | $ | 3,294 | $ | 27,641 | $ | 3,549 | ||||
| (Loss)
                income from  | ||||||||||||
| discontinued
                operations | (84 | ) | 25 | 7,617 | 178 | |||||||
| Net
                income | $ | 1,181 | $ | 3,319 | $ | 35,258 | $ | 3,727 | ||||
Our
      deferred tax assets at December 31, 2005 totaled $17.6 million and we had
      provided a 100 percent valuation allowance because realization of the deferred
      tax assets was not considered likely. Realization of our deferred tax assets
      is
      dependent on generating sufficient taxable income within the carryforward period
      available under tax law. In the first quarter of 2006, we sold 7000 West (see
      Note 6) and in April 2006 we completed the sale of 58 acres at our Lantana
      property. These transactions generated pre-tax income of $25.6 million and
      along
      with our current homebuilder contract arrangements and projected levels of
      future sales provide sufficient evidence that we now believe it is more likely
      than not that we will be able to realize all of our deferred tax assets. As
      a
      result, first-quarter 2006 net income from continuing operations included a
      $6.4
      million, $0.88 per basic share and $0.83 per diluted share, tax benefit
      resulting from the reversal of a portion of our deferred tax asset valuation
      allowance and the remaining balance of our valuation allowance is being realized
      in our 2006 effective tax rate. We recorded an income tax provision of $84,000
      in the third quarter of 2006 which was allocated to discontinued operations
      in
      accordance with income tax accounting rules.
    In
      May
      2006, the Texas governor signed into law the Texas Revised Franchise Bill (the
      Franchise Tax). The Franchise Tax replaces current taxable capital and earned
      surplus components with a tax based on “taxable margin.” Taxable margin is
      defined as the entity’s total revenues less either cost of goods sold or
      compensation. Our income tax benefit from continuing operations for the first
      nine months of 2006 includes a deferred tax credit of $45,000 related to the
      Franchise Tax.
    We
      have
      two operating segments, “Real Estate Operations” and “Commercial Leasing” (see
      Note 7). The following is a discussion of our operating results by
      segment.
    Real
      Estate Operations
    Summary
      real estate operating results follow (in thousands):
    | Third
                Quarter | Nine
                Months | |||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
| Revenues: | ||||||||||||
| Developed
                property sales | $ | 7,934 | $ | 6,603 | $ | 28,441 | $ | 15,480 | ||||
| Undeveloped
                property sales | - | 5,000 | 22,245 | 5,000 | ||||||||
| Commissions,
                management fees and other | 746 | 179 | 1,296 | 589 | ||||||||
| Total
                revenues | 8,680 | 11,782 | 51,982 | 21,069 | ||||||||
| Cost
                of sales | (5,662 | ) | (7,111 | ) | (24,960 | ) | (13,175 | ) | ||||
| General
                and administrative expenses | (1,425 | ) | (970 | ) | (4,728 | ) | (3,074 | ) | ||||
| Operating
                income | $ | 1,593
                 | $ | 3,701 | $ | 22,294 | $ | 4,820 | ||||
18
          Developed
      Property Sales. Improving
      market conditions in the Austin area have resulted in increased lot sales in
      the
      first nine months of 2006. Property sales for the third-quarter and nine-month
      periods of 2006 and 2005 included the following (revenues in
      thousands):
    | Third
                Quarter | ||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | |||||||
| Lots | Revenues | Lots | Revenues | |||||
| Residential
                Properties: | ||||||||
| Barton
                Creek | ||||||||
| Calera
                Drive | 5 | $2,065 | 5 | $2,110 | ||||
| Calera
                Court Courtyard Homes | 1 | 610 | - | - | ||||
| Mirador
                Estate | 1 | 553 | - | - | ||||
| Wimberly
                Lane Phase II | ||||||||
| Standard
                Homebuilder | 4 | 686 | 4 | 615 | ||||
| Escala
                Drive Estate | - | - | 4 | 2,218 | ||||
| Circle
                C | ||||||||
| Meridian | 51 | 3,013 | - | - | ||||
| Deerfield | 15 | 1,007 | 27 | 1,660 | ||||
| Total
                Residential | 77 | $7,934 | 40 | $6,603 | ||||
| Nine
                Months | ||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | |||||||
| Lots | Revenues | Lots | Revenues | |||||
| Residential
                Properties: | ||||||||
| Barton
                Creek | ||||||||
| Calera
                Drive | 23 | $9,919 | 5 | $2,110 | ||||
| Calera
                Court Courtyard Homes | 5 | 2,922 | - | - | ||||
| Mirador
                Estate | 6 | 3,306 | 6 | 3,292 | ||||
| Wimberly
                Lane Phase II | ||||||||
| Standard
                Homebuilder | 9 | 1,469 | 7 | 1,092 | ||||
| Estate | - | - | 5 | 1,551
                 | ||||
| Escala
                Drive Estate | - | - | 7 | 3,992 | ||||
| Circle
                C | ||||||||
| Meridian | 133 | 7,804 | - | - | ||||
| Deerfield | 45 | 3,021 | 56 | 3,443 | ||||
| Total
                Residential | 221 | $28,441 | 86 | $15,480 | ||||
Undeveloped
      Property Sales.
      During
      the first quarter of 2006, we sold a 7.5-acre tract in the Barton Creek
      community for $1.5 million. In April 2006, we sold a 58-acre tract at Lantana
      to
      AMD for $21.2 million of which $0.5 million represented a reimbursement of
      certain costs and we recorded this amount as a reduction of cost of sales.
      During the third quarter of 2005, we sold a 38-acre tract within the Barton
      Creek Community for $5.0 million.
    Commissions,
      Management Fees and Other.
      Commissions, management fees and other revenues included sales of our
      development fee credits to third parties totaling $0.5 million in the third
      quarter of 2006, $0.2 million in the third quarter of 2005, $0.9 million in
      the
      first nine months of 2006 and $0.4 million in the first nine months of 2005.
      We
      received these development fee credits as part of the Circle C settlement (see
      Note 8 of our 2005 Form 10-K).
    Cost
      of Sales and General and Administrative Expenses.
      Cost of
      sales totaled $5.7 million in the third quarter of 2006 and $25.0 million in
      the
      first nine months of 2006, compared with $7.1 million in the 2005 quarter and
      $13.2 million in the 2005 nine-month period. Cost of sales for the third quarter
      of 2005 
    19
        includes
      the cost of a 38-acre tract sale The increase in cost of sales for the 2006
      nine-month period primarily relates to the increase in lot sales and other
      land
      sales in 2006 compared to the 2005 nine-month period. General and administrative
      expenses increased to $1.4 million in the third quarter of 2006 and $4.7 million
      in the first nine months of 2006, compared to $1.0 million in the 2005 quarter
      and $3.1 million in the 2005 nine-month period primarily because of higher
      compensation costs (see “Other Financial Results” below).
    Commercial
      Leasing
    Our
      commercial leasing operating results primarily reflect the activities at
      Escarpment Village, two office buildings at 7500 Rialto Boulevard and Southwest
      Property Services L.L.C. after removing the results for 7000 West which are
      now
      classified as discontinued operations (see “Discontinued Operations - 7000 West”
below). Summary commercial leasing operating results follow (in
      thousands):
    | Third
                Quarter | Nine
                Months | |||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
| Rental
                income | $ | 1,170 | $ | 364 | $ | 2,433 | $ | 983 | ||||
| Rental
                property costs | (710 | ) | (378 | ) | (1,612 | ) | (1,060 | ) | ||||
| Depreciation | (429 | ) | (156 | ) | (947 | ) | (460 | ) | ||||
| General
                and administrative expenses | (158 | ) | (142 | ) | (477 | ) | (464 | ) | ||||
| Operating
                loss | $ | (127 | ) | $ | (312 | ) | $ | (603 | ) | $ | (1,001 | ) | 
In
      2006,
      we began earning rental income from our Escarpment Village project that was
      substantially completed in the second quarter of 2006. Rental income from our
      Escarpment Village project totaled $0.8 million in the third quarter of 2006
      and
      $1.3 million in the first nine months of 2006. The balance of our rental income
      in the 2006 periods and all of the rental income in the 2005 periods is
      primarily from one of our 7500 Rialto Boulevard office buildings. As discussed
      earlier, in September 2006, we completed construction of a second
      75,000-square-foot office building at 7500 Rialto Boulevard which is
      approximately 50 percent leased.
    Our
      lease
      agreement with the anchor tenant of Escarpment Village and our contract with
      Trammell Crow, the firm managing Escarpment Village, contain provisions
      requiring that we share the net profits from a sale of the project. The anchor
      tenant and Trammell Crow are each entitled to 10 percent of any net profit
      from
      a sale of Escarpment Village after we receive a 12 percent return on our
      investment. We are required to pay the anchor tenant its net profits interest
      upon a sale of the project, but no later than May 2007. We are required to
      pay
      Trammell Crow its net profits interest upon a sale of the project, but no later
      than May 2008. If the project is not sold prior to either payment deadline,
      then
      the net profits calculation will be made based upon a hypothetical sale at
      fair
      market value. As of September 30, 2006, we estimate the net profit payments
      will
      total $0.9 million. This amount was recorded in other assets and is being
      amortized over the tenant’s lease term (20 years) as a reduction of rental
      income. The actual payment may vary from this amount and will be based on the
      sale price of Escarpment Village or the estimated fair value of Escarpment
      Village, as applicable.
    Other
      Financial Results
    Consolidated
      general and administrative expenses increased to $1.6 million in the third
      quarter of 2006 and $5.2 million in the first nine months of 2006, from $1.1
      million in the 2005 quarter and $3.5 million in the 2005 nine-month period,
      primarily because of higher compensation costs, including stock-based
      compensation costs. On January 1, 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial
      Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment.” Stock-based
      compensation costs charged to general and administrative expenses totaled $0.1
      million in the third quarter of 2006 quarter, $0.1 million in the third quarter
      of 2005, $0.6 million in the first nine months of 2006 and $0.2 million in
      the
      first nine months of 2005.
    
    DISCONTINUED
      OPERATIONS - 7000 WEST
    In
      the
      fourth quarter of 2005, we committed to a plan to sell our office buildings
      at
      7000 West. On March 27, 2006, our wholly owned subsidiary, Stratus 7000 West
      Joint Venture (7000 West JV), sold its two
      70,000-square-foot
      office buildings at 7000 West William Cannon Drive (7000 West), known as the
      Lantana Corporate Center, to
      CarrAmerica Lantana, LP (CarrAmerica) for
      $22.3
      million, resulting in a gain of $9.8 million ($7.3 million net of taxes or
      $1.00
      per basic share and $0.95 per diluted share) in the first nine months of 2006.
      CarrAmerica
      paid us $10.6 million cash at closing and assumed the $11.7 million principal
      balance remaining under our 7000 West project loan from Teachers
      Insurance and Annuity Association of America (TIAA).
      In
      connection with CarrAmerica’s assumption of the loan, 7000 West JV entered into
      a First Modification Agreement with CarrAmerica and TIAA under which TIAA
      released 7000 West JV’s $3.5 million letter of credit issued by Comerica Bank
      that secured certain re-tenanting obligations and released 7000 West JV from
      all
      future obligations under the loan. In addition, TIAA released us from all future
      liabilities under its guaranty of 7000 West JV’s environmental representations
      and recourse obligations under the loan.
    Upon
      completion of the sale of 7000 West, Stratus ceased all involvement with the
      7000 West office buildings. The operations, assets and liabilities of 7000
      West
      represented a component of our commercial leasing segment.
    Our
      discontinued operations generated net income of $8.2 million, including a $7.8
      million gain net of taxes on the sale, in the first quarter of 2006, and
      additional income taxes totaling $0.5 million in the second quarter of 2006
      and
      $0.1 million in the third quarter of 2006 that reduced the gain on the sale.
      Net
      income from discontinued operations totaled $25,000 in the third quarter of
      2005
      and $0.2 million in the first nine months of 2005. We earned rental income
      of
      $0.9 million in the third quarter of 2005, $1.1 million in the first nine months
      of 2006 and $2.6 million in the first nine months of 2005 from the two fully
      leased office buildings at 7000 West.
    CAPITAL
      RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
    Comparison
      of Nine-Months 2006 and 2005 Cash Flows
    Operating
      activities provided cash of $39.6 million during the first nine months of 2006
      and $24.0 million during the first nine months of 2005, including cash provided
      by discontinued operations totaling $0.4 million during the 2006 period and
      $1.1
      million during the 2005 period. Compared to the 2005 period, operating cash
      flows in the first nine months of 2006 improved primarily because of the
      increase in sales activities.
    Cash
      used
      in investing activities before discontinued operations totaled $28.2 million
      during the first nine months of 2006, compared with $29.3 million during the
      2005 period. Real estate development expenditures for the first nine months
      of
      2006 and 2005 included development costs for properties in the Barton Creek,
      Lantana and Circle C communities. Commercial leasing expenditures for the first
      nine months of 2006 primarily related to the second building at 7500 Rialto
      Boulevard, which was completed in September 2006. Expenditures in the 2006
      and
      2005 nine-month periods were partly offset by Barton Creek Municipal Utility
      District (MUD) reimbursements of $1.3 million for the first nine months of
      2006
      and $0.6 million for the first nine months of 2005. The 2006 nine-month period
      included $10.0 million received from the March 2006 sale of 7000 West (see
      “Discontinued Operations - 7000 West”).
    During
      the first nine months of 2006, our financing activities included $22.8 million
      received from a 30-year mortgage on Escarpment Village and net repayments of
      $15.7 million on our revolving line of credit and $24.6 million on our project
      construction loans, including repayments of $6.5 million on the 7500 Rialto
      Boulevard project loan and $2.9 million on the Deerfield loan and net repayments
      of $5.3 million on the Meridian project loan and $9.9 million on the Escarpment
      Village project loan. During the first nine months of 2005, our financing
      activities reflected $1.4 million of net borrowings under our revolving line
      of
      credit and $7.5 million of net borrowings from our project construction loans,
      including borrowings of $8.6 million from the Meridian project loan and $2.8
      million from the Escarpment Village project loan, net repayments of $2.5 million
      on the Deerfield project loan
      and
      final payment of $1.2 million on the Calera Court project 
    21
        loan.
      See
“Credit Facility and Other Financing Arrangements” below for a discussion of our
      outstanding debt at September 30, 2006.
    In
      2001,
      our Board of Directors approved an open market share purchase program for up
      to
      0.7 million shares of our common stock. During the first nine months of 2006,
      we
      purchased 22,051 shares for $0.5 million, a $24.59 per share average. A total
      of
      470,565 shares remain available under this program. During the first nine months
      of 2005, we purchased 187,271 shares for $3.3 million, a $17.66 per share
      average, including a privately negotiated purchase of 125,316 shares from a
      former executive for $2.3 million, an $18.13 per share average. The transaction
      was based on market prices of our common stock. Our loan agreement with Comerica
      provides a limit of $6.5 million for common stock purchases after September
      30,
      2005. The timing of future purchases of our common stock is dependent on many
      factors including the price of our common shares, our cash flows and financial
      position, and general economic and market conditions.
    Credit
      Facility and Other Financing Arrangements
    At
      September 30, 2006, we had total debt of $32.8 million, including $0.3 million
      of current debt, compared to total debt of $50.3 million, including $0.2 million
      of current debt, at December 31, 2005. We used proceeds from the 7000 West
      and
      AMD sales to reduce debt in the first nine months of 2006. Our debt outstanding
      at September 30, 2006 consisted of the following:
    | · | $22.8
                million of borrowings under a 30-year mortgage with a 10-year balloon
                payment from TIAA; and | 
| · | $10.0
                million of borrowings outstanding under two unsecured $5.0 million
                term
                loans, one of which will mature in January 2008 and the other in
                July
                2008. | 
In
      June
      2006, we entered into a 30-year, $22.8 million mortgage from TIAA and used
      the
      proceeds plus cash from operating activities to repay all of our outstanding
      project loans and to reduce borrowings under our credit facility. We had
      unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $5.5 million at September 30,
      2006.
    In
      May
      2006, we entered into a modification and extension agreement to extend the
      maturity and decrease the interest rate on our Comerica revolving credit
      facility. The maturity date was extended from May 30, 2007 to May 30, 2008
      and
      interest accrues, at our option, at Comerica’s rate minus 0.8 percent or
      one-month London Interbank Offered Rate plus 1.95 percent, subject to a minimum
      annual rate of 5.0 percent. The available commitment of $45 million and other
      conditions and security remain unchanged.
    Outlook
    As
      discussed in “Risk Factors” located in our 2005 Form 10-K, our financial
      condition and results of operations are highly dependent upon market conditions
      in Austin. Our future operating cash flows and, ultimately, our ability to
      develop our properties and expand our business will be largely dependent on
      the
      level of our real estate sales. In turn, these sales will be significantly
      affected by future real estate market conditions in Austin, Texas, development
      costs, interest rate levels and regulatory issues including our land use and
      development entitlements. From 2001 through 2004, a downturn in the technology
      sector negatively affected the Austin real estate market, especially the
      high-end residential and commercial leasing markets; however, beginning in
      2005,
      market conditions have improved.
    Over
      the
      past several years, we have successfully worked cooperatively with the City
      to
      obtain approvals that allow the development of our properties to proceed in
      a
      timely manner while protecting the environment. We believe the desirable
      location and overall quality of our properties, in combination with the land
      use
      and development entitlements we have obtained, will command a premium over
      the
      value of other Austin-area properties.
    Our
      long-term success will depend on our ability to maximize the value of our real
      estate through obtaining required approvals that permit us to develop and sell
      our properties in a timely manner at a reasonable cost. We must incur
      significant development expenditures and secure additional permits prior to
      the
      development and sale of certain properties. In addition, we continue to pursue
      additional development 
    22
        opportunities,
      and believe we can obtain bank financing for developing our properties at a
      reasonable cost.
    NEW
      ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
    Accounting
      for Stock-Based Compensation.
      As of
      September 30, 2006, we had three stock-based employee compensation plans and
      one
      stock-based director compensation plan. Prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted
      for options granted under all of our plans under the recognition and measurement
      principles of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for
      Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations, as permitted by
      Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, “Accounting for
      Stock-Based Compensation.” APB Opinion No. 25 required compensation cost for
      stock options to be recognized based on the difference on the date of grant,
      if
      any, between the quoted market price of the stock and the amount an employee
      must pay to acquire the stock (i.e., the intrinsic value). Because all the
      plans
      require that the option exercise price be at least the market price on the
      date
      of grant, we recognized no compensation cost on the grant or exercise of our
      employees’ options through December 31, 2005. Other awards of restricted stock
      units under the plans did result in compensation costs being recognized in
      earnings based on the intrinsic value on the date of grant.
    Effective
      January 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No.
      123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” or “SFAS No. 123R,” using the modified
      prospective transition method. Under that transition method, compensation cost
      recognized in 2006 includes: (a) compensation costs for all stock option awards
      granted to employees prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based
      on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original
      provisions of SFAS No. 123, and (b) compensation costs for all stock option
      awards granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair
      value
      estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R. Other stock-based
      awards charged to expense under SFAS No. 123 (i.e., restricted stock units)
      continue to be charged to expense under SFAS No. 123R (see Note 2). Results
      for
      prior periods have not been restated.
    As
      a
      result of adopting SFAS No. 123R on January 1, 2006, our net income for the
      three months ended September 30, 2006, was $0.1 million ($0.02 per basic and
      diluted share) lower, and our net income for the nine months ended September
      30,
      2006, was $0.6 million ($0.08 per basic and diluted share) lower than if we
      had
      continued to account for share-based compensation under APB Opinion No.
      25.
    Compensation
      cost charged against earnings for stock-based awards is shown below (in
      thousands). We capitalized $0.1 million of stock-based compensation costs to
      fixed assets in the third quarter of 2006 and $0.2 million in the first nine
      months of 2006 and none in the 2005 periods.
    | Three
                Months Ended | Nine
                Months Ended | |||||||||||
| September
                30, | September
                30, | |||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
| Cost
                of sales | $ | 71 | $ | - | $ | 266 | $ | - | ||||
| General
                and administrative expenses | 144 | 93 | 628 | 239 | ||||||||
| Total
                stock-based compensation cost | $ | 215 | $ | 93 | $ | 894 | $ | 239 | ||||
Accounting
      for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.
      In June
      2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 48,
      “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the
      accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold
      a
      tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial
      statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement,
      classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
      disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for the first fiscal year
      beginning after December 15, 2006. We are reviewing the provisions of FIN 48
      and
      have not yet determined the impact of adoption.
23
        CAUTIONARY
      STATEMENT
    Management’s
      Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
      contains forward-looking statements regarding proposed real estate sales and
      development activities at the Deerfield project, the Barton Creek community,
      the
      Circle C community and at Lantana; the proposed development of a mixed-use
      project in downtown Austin; future events related to financing and regulatory
      matters; the expected results of our business strategy; and other plans and
      objectives of management for future operations and activities. Important factors
      that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations
      include economic and business conditions, business opportunities that may be
      presented to and pursued by us, changes in laws or regulations and other
      factors, many of which are beyond our control, and other factors that are
      described in more detail under “Risk Factors” located in our 2005 Form
      10-K.
    There
      have been no significant changes in our market risks since the year ended
      December 31, 2005. For more information, please read the consolidated financial
      statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
      the
      year ended December 31, 2005.
    Item
      4.
Controls
      and Procedures.
    (a) Evaluation
      of disclosure controls and procedures.
      Our
      chief executive officer and chief financial officer, with the participation
      of
      management, have evaluated the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and
      procedures” (as defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) under the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
      report on Form 10-Q. Based on their evaluation, they have concluded that our
      disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to
      material information relating to Stratus (including our consolidated
      subsidiaries) required to be disclosed in our periodic Securities and Exchange
      Commission filings.
    (b) Changes
      in internal controls.
      There
      has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that
      occurred during the third quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect our internal control over financial
      reporting.
    Item
      1. Legal
      Proceedings.
    We
      may
      from time to time be involved in various legal proceedings of a character
      normally incident to the ordinary course of our business. We believe that
      potential liability from any of these pending or threatened proceedings will
      not
      have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of
      operations. We maintain liability insurance to cover some, but not all,
      potential liabilities normally incident to the ordinary course of our business
      as well as other insurance coverage customary in our business, with such
      coverage limits as management deems prudent.
    Item
      1A.
Risk
      Factors.
    There
      have been no material changes to our risk factors since the year ended December
      31, 2005. For more information, please read Item 1A included in our Form 10-K
      for the year ended December 31, 2005.
    The
      following table sets forth shares of our common stock we repurchased during
      the
      three-month period ended September 30, 2006.
24
        | Current
                Programa | |||||||||
| Period | Total
                Shares Purchased | Average
                Price Paid Per Share | Shares
                Purchased | Shares
                Available for Purchase | |||||
| July
                1 to 31, 2006 | - | -
                 | - | 471,948 | |||||
| August
                1 to 31, 2006 | 1,143 | $27.00 | 1,143 | 470,805 | |||||
| September
                1 to 30, 2006 | 240 | 26.91 | 240 | 470,565 | |||||
| Total | 1,383 | 26.99 | 1,383 | ||||||
| a. | In
                February 2001, our Board of Directors approved an open market share
                purchase program for up to 0.7 million shares of our common stock.
                The
                program does not have an expiration date. Our loan agreement with
                Comerica
                provides a limit of $6.5 million for common stock purchases after
                September 30, 2005. | 
Item
      6.
Exhibits.
    The
      exhibits to this report are listed in the Exhibit Index beginning on page E-1
      hereof.
    Instruments
      with respect to other long-term debt of Stratus and its consolidated
      subsidiaries are omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K
      since
      the total amount authorized under each such omitted instrument does not exceed
      10 percent of the total assets of Stratus and its subsidiaries on a consolidated
      basis. Stratus hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any such instrument to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
    Pursuant
      to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
      has
      duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
      duly authorized.
    STRATUS
      PROPERTIES INC.
    By:
      /s/
      John E. Baker
    -----------------------------------
    John
      E.
      Baker
    Senior
      Vice President and
    Chief
      Financial Officer
    (authorized
      signatory and
    Principal
      Financial Officer)
    Date: November
      9, 2006
    25
        STRATUS
      PROPERTIES INC.
    
    Exhibit
    Number
    | 3.1 | Amended
                and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Stratus. Incorporated
                by
                reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
                Stratus
                for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (Stratus’ 2004 First Quarter Form
                10-Q). | 
| 3.2 | Certificate
                of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
                of
                Stratus, dated May 14, 1998. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
                3.2 to
                Stratus’ 2004 First Quarter Form 10-Q. | 
| 3.3 | Certificate
                of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
                of
                Stratus, dated May 25, 2001. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
                3.2 to
                the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Stratus for the fiscal year ended
                December 31, 2001 (Stratus’ 2001 Form 10-K). | 
| 3.4 | By-laws
                of Stratus, as amended as of February 11, 1999. Incorporated by reference
                to Exhibit 3.4 to Stratus’ 2004 First Quarter Form
                10-Q. | 
| 4.1 | Rights
                Agreement dated as of May 16, 2002, between Stratus and Mellon Investor
                Services LLP, as Rights Agent, which includes the Certificates of
                Designation of Series C Participating Preferred Stock; the Forms
                of Rights
                Certificate Assignment, and Election to Purchase; and the Summary
                of
                Rights to Purchase Preferred Shares. Incorporated by reference to
                Exhibit
                4.1 to Stratus’ Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated May 22,
                2002. | 
| 4.2 | Amendment
                No. 1 to Rights Agreement between Stratus Properties Inc. and Mellon
                Investor Services LLC, as Rights Agent, dated as of November 7, 2003.
                Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on
                Form 8-K
                of Stratus dated November 7, 2003. | 
| 10.1 | Modification
                and Extension Agreement by and between Stratus Properties Inc., Stratus
                Properties Operating Co., L.P., Circle C Land, L.P., Austin 290
                Properties, Inc., Calera Court, L.P., and Comerica Bank effective
                July 19,
                2006. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report
                on
                Form 8-K of Stratus dated July 19, 2006. | 
| 10.2 | Loan
                Agreement by and between Stratus Properties Inc., Stratus Properties
                Operating Co., L.P., Circle C Land, L.P., Austin 290 Properties,
                Inc.,
                Calera Court, L.P., and Comerica Bank dated as of September 30, 2005.
                Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on
                Form
                8-K of Stratus dated September 30, 2005. | 
| 10.3 | Revolving
                Promissory Note by and between Stratus Properties Inc., Stratus Properties
                Operating Co., L.P., Circle C Land, L.P., Austin 290 Properties,
                Inc.,
                Calera Court, L.P., and Comerica Bank dated as of September 30, 2005.
                Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on
                Form
                8-K of Stratus dated September 30, 2005. | 
| 10.4 | Loan
                Agreement dated December 28, 2000, by and between Stratus Properties
                Inc.
                and Holliday Fenoliglio Fowler, L.P., subsequently assigned to an
                affiliate of First American Asset Management. Incorporated by reference
                to
                Exhibit 10.20 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Stratus for the
                fiscal
                year ended December 31, 2000. | 
| 10.5 | Loan
                Agreement dated June 14, 2001, by and between Stratus Properties
                Inc. and
                Holliday Fenoliglio Fowler, L.P., subsequently assigned to an affiliate
                of
                First American Asset Management. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
                10.20 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stratus for the quarter
                ended September 30, 2001. | 
E-1
        | 10.6 | Construction
                Loan Agreement dated June 11, 2001, between 7500 Rialto Boulevard,
                L.P.
                and Comerica Bank-Texas. Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.26
                to
                Stratus’ 2001 Form 10-K. | 
| 10.7 | Modification
                Agreement dated January 31, 2003, by and between Lantana Office Properties
                I, L.P., formerly 7500 Rialto Boulevard, L.P., and Comerica Bank-Texas.
                Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Quarterly Report
                on Form
                10-Q of Stratus for the quarter ended March 31,
                2003. | 
| 10.8 | Second
                Modification Agreement dated as of December 29, 2003, to be effective
                as
                of January 31, 2004, by and between Lantana Office Properties I,
                L.P., a
                Texas limited partnership (formerly known as 7500 Rialto Boulevard,
                L.P.),
                as borrower, and Comerica Bank, as lender. Incorporated by reference
                to
                Exhibit 10.20 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Stratus for the
                fiscal
                year ended December 31, 2003 (Stratus’ 2003 Form 10-K). | 
| 10.9 | Guaranty
                Agreement dated June 11, 2001, by Stratus Properties Inc. in favor
                of
                Comerica Bank-Texas. Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.27 to
                Stratus’ 2001 Form 10-K. | 
| 10.10 | Loan
                Agreement dated September 22, 2003, by and between Calera Court,
                L.P., as
                borrower, and Comerica Bank, as lender. Incorporated by reference
                to
                Exhibit 10.26 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stratus for
                the
                quarter ended September 30, 2003. | 
| 10.11 | Development
                Agreement dated August 15, 2002, between Circle C Land Corp. and
                City of
                Austin. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Quarterly
                Report
                on Form 10-Q of Stratus for the quarter ended September 30,
                2002. | 
| 10.12 | First
                Modification Agreement dated March 27, 2006, by and between Stratus
                7000
                West Joint Venture, as Old Borrower, and CarrAmerica Lantana, LP,
                as New
                Borrower, and Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America,
                as
                Lender. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current
                Report on
                Form 8-K of Stratus dated March 27, 2006. | 
| 10.13 | Agreement
                of Sale and Purchase dated November 23, 2005, by and between Stratus
                Properties Operating Co., L.P., as Seller, and Advanced Micro Devices,
                Inc., as Purchaser. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to
                the
                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stratus for the quarter ended March
                31,
                2006 (Stratus’ 2006 First Quarter Form 10-Q). | 
| 10.14 | First
                Amendment to Agreement of Sale and Purchase dated April 26, 2006,
                by and
                between Stratus Properties Operating Co., L.P., as Seller, and Advanced
                Micro Devices, Inc., as Purchaser. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
                10.13 to Stratus’ 2006 First Quarter Form 10-Q. | 
| 10.15 | Deed
                of Trust, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and
                Fixture
                Filing dated as of June 30, 2006, by and among Escarpment Village,
                L.P.
                and Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America. Incorporated
                by
                reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
                Stratus
                for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (Stratus’ 2006 Second Quarter Form
                10-Q). | 
| 10.16 | Promissory
                Note dated as of June 30, 2006, by and between Escarpment Village,
                L.P.
                and Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America. Incorporated
                by
                reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Stratus’ 2006 Second Quarter Form
                10-Q. | 
| Executive
                Compensation Plans and Arrangements (Exhibits 10.17 through
                10.26) | |
| 10.17 | Stratus’
                Performance Incentive Awards Program, as amended, effective February
                11,
                1999. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to Stratus’ 2004 First
                Quarter Form 10-Q. | 
| 10.18 | Stratus
                Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to
                Stratus’
                2003 Form 10-K. | 
E-2
        | 10.19 | Stratus
                1996 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors. Incorporated by
                reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
                Stratus
                for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (Stratus’ 2005 Second Quarter Form
                10-Q). | 
| 10.20 | Stratus
                Properties Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by reference
                to
                Exhibit 10.23 to Stratus’ 2005 Second Quarter Form
                10-Q. | 
| 10.21 | Form
                of Notice of Grant of Nonqualified Stock Options and Limited Rights
                under
                the 1998 Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
                10.24 to
                Stratus’ 2005 Second Quarter Form 10-Q. | 
| 10.22 | Form
                of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the 1998 Stock Option Plan.
                Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to Stratus’ 2005 Second Quarter
                Form 10-Q. | 
| 10.23 | Stratus
                Properties Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference
                to
                Exhibit 10.26 to Stratus’ 2005 Second Quarter Form
                10-Q. | 
| 10.24 | Form
                of Notice of Grant of Nonqualified Stock Options and Limited Rights
                under
                the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
                10.27
                to Stratus’ 2005 Second Quarter Form 10-Q. | 
| 10.25 | Form
                of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the 2002 Stock Incentive
                Plan.
                Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to Stratus’ 2005 Second Quarter
                Form 10-Q. | 
| 10.26 | Stratus
                Director Compensation. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20
                to the
                Annual Report on Form 10-K of Stratus for the fiscal year ended December
                31, 2005. | 
| Letter
                from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP regarding the unaudited interim financial
                statements. | |
| Certification
                of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
                13a-14(a)/15d-14(a). | |
| Certification
                of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule
                13a-14(a)/15d-14(a). | |
| Certification
                of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
                1350. | |
| Certification
                of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
                1350. | 
E-3
        Similar companies
See also ST JOE Co - Annual report 2022 (10-K 2022-12-31) Annual report 2023 (10-Q 2023-09-30)See also IRSA INVESTMENTS & REPRESENTATIONS INC
See also AMREP CORP. - Annual report 2023 (10-K 2023-04-30) Annual report 2025 (10-Q 2025-01-31)
See also FORGE INNOVATION DEVELOPMENT CORP. - Annual report 2022 (10-K 2022-12-31) Annual report 2023 (10-Q 2023-09-30)
See also KAANAPALI LAND LLC - Annual report 2022 (NT 10-K 2022-12-31) Annual report 2023 (10-Q 2023-09-30)
