STRATUS PROPERTIES INC - Quarter Report: 2009 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
|
|||
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
|
|||
Washington,
D.C. 20549
|
|||
FORM
10-Q
|
|||
(Mark
One)
|
|||
[X]
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
|
||
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|||
For
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
|
|||
or
|
|||
[ ]
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
|
||
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|||
For
the transition period from
|
to
|
||
Commission
File Number: 0-19989
|
|||
Stratus
Properties Inc.
|
|||
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its
charter)
|
Delaware
|
72-1211572
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
98
San Jacinto Blvd., Suite 220
|
|
Austin,
Texas
|
78701
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(512)
478-5788
|
|
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
|
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. R
Yes o No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of
this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). o
Yes o No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o
Smaller reporting company R
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes R
No
On
October 30, 2009, there were issued and outstanding 7,435,133 shares of the
registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share.
STRATUS PROPERTIES INC.
|
|
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
|
Page
|
|
2
|
|
2
|
|
3
|
|
4
|
|
5
|
|
6
|
|
16
|
|
26
|
|
26
|
|
26
|
|
26
|
|
27
|
|
E-1
|
|
STRATUS
PROPERTIES INC.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial
Statements.
STRATUS PROPERTIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
(In
Thousands)
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||
ASSETS
|
||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
24,926
|
$
|
17,097
|
||
Investment
in U.S. treasury securities
|
-
|
15,388
|
||||
Real
estate, commercial leasing assets and facilities, net:
|
||||||
Property
held for sale – developed or under development
|
136,473
|
115,966
|
||||
Property
held for sale – undeveloped
|
31,928
|
27,514
|
||||
Property
held for use, net
|
84,709
|
56,919
|
||||
Deferred
tax asset
|
8,633
|
7,330
|
||||
Investment
in unconsolidated affiliate
|
3,468
|
2,283
|
||||
Other
assets
|
13,552
|
10,049
|
||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
303,689
|
$
|
252,546
|
||
LIABILITIES
AND EQUITY
|
||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
$
|
12,278
|
$
|
6,585
|
||
Deposits
|
7,396
|
1,301
|
||||
Accrued
interest and property taxes
|
2,975
|
3,203
|
||||
Debt
|
75,951
|
63,352
|
||||
Other
liabilities
|
2,079
|
3,583
|
||||
Total
liabilities
|
100,679
|
78,024
|
||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
||||||
Equity:
|
||||||
Stratus
stockholders’ equity:
|
||||||
Preferred
stock
|
-
|
-
|
||||
Common
stock
|
83
|
83
|
||||
Capital
in excess of par value of common stock
|
197,285
|
196,692
|
||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(34,829
|
)
|
(30,095
|
)
|
||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
-
|
(3
|
)
|
|||
Common
stock held in treasury
|
(17,941
|
)
|
(17,441
|
)
|
||
Total
Stratus stockholders’ equity
|
144,598
|
149,236
|
||||
Noncontrolling
interest in subsidiary
|
58,412
|
25,286
|
||||
Total
equity
|
203,010
|
174,522
|
||||
Total
liabilities and equity
|
$
|
303,689
|
$
|
252,546
|
||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
STRATUS PROPERTIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(In
Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||
Real
estate
|
$
|
2,116
|
$
|
5,691
|
$
|
4,201
|
$
|
11,994
|
||||
Rental
income
|
1,163
|
1,158
|
3,296
|
3,278
|
||||||||
Commissions,
management fees and other
|
65
|
60
|
869
|
792
|
||||||||
Total
revenues
|
3,344
|
6,909
|
8,366
|
16,064
|
||||||||
Cost
of sales:
|
||||||||||||
Real
estate, net
|
2,710
|
4,954
|
6,806
|
11,163
|
||||||||
Rental
|
788
|
944
|
2,405
|
2,683
|
||||||||
Depreciation
|
403
|
435
|
1,227
|
1,211
|
||||||||
Total
cost of sales
|
3,901
|
6,333
|
10,438
|
15,057
|
||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
1,818
|
1,723
|
5,832
|
5,277
|
||||||||
Total
costs and expenses
|
5,719
|
8,056
|
16,270
|
20,334
|
||||||||
Operating
loss
|
(2,375
|
)
|
(1,147
|
)
|
(7,904
|
)
|
(4,270
|
)
|
||||
Interest
income and other
|
66
|
330
|
894
|
1,432
|
||||||||
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
-
|
-
|
(182
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||
Gain
(loss) on interest rate cap agreement
|
(37
|
)
|
(121
|
)
|
33
|
(121
|
)
|
|||||
Loss
from continuing operations before income taxes and
|
||||||||||||
equity
in unconsolidated affiliate’s (loss) income
|
(2,346
|
)
|
(938
|
)
|
(7,159
|
)
|
(2,959
|
)
|
||||
Equity
in unconsolidated affiliate’s (loss) income
|
(95
|
)
|
99
|
(277
|
)
|
365
|
||||||
Benefit
from income taxes
|
844
|
268
|
2,448
|
660
|
||||||||
Loss
from continuing operations
|
(1,597
|
)
|
(571
|
)
|
(4,988
|
)
|
(1,934
|
)
|
||||
Loss
from discontinued operations
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(105
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
loss
|
(1,597
|
)
|
(571
|
)
|
(4,988
|
)
|
(2,039
|
)
|
||||
Net
loss attributable to noncontrolling interest in subsidiary
|
44
|
124
|
254
|
188
|
||||||||
Net
loss attributable to Stratus common stock
|
$
|
(1,553
|
)
|
$
|
(447
|
)
|
$
|
(4,734
|
)
|
$
|
(1,851
|
)
|
Net
loss per share attributable to Stratus common stock:
|
||||||||||||
Continuing
operations
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
$
|
(0.64
|
)
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
Discontinued
operations
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|||||||
Basic
and diluted net loss per share attributable to Stratus
|
||||||||||||
common
stock
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
$
|
(0.64
|
)
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
Weighted
average shares of common stock outstanding:
|
||||||||||||
Basic
and diluted
|
7,435
|
7,641
|
7,439
|
7,613
|
||||||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
STRATUS PROPERTIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(In
Thousands)
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||
Cash
flow from operating activities:
|
||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(4,988
|
)
|
$
|
(2,039
|
)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash
|
||||||
used
in operating activities:
|
||||||
Loss
from discontinued operations
|
-
|
105
|
||||
Depreciation
|
1,227
|
1,211
|
||||
(Gain)
loss on interest rate cap agreement
|
(33
|
)
|
121
|
|||
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
182
|
-
|
||||
Cost
of real estate sold
|
2,912
|
8,126
|
||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(1,303
|
)
|
(648
|
)
|
||
Stock-based
compensation
|
552
|
761
|
||||
Equity
in unconsolidated affiliate’s loss (income)
|
277
|
(365
|
)
|
|||
Distribution
of unconsolidated affiliate’s income
|
-
|
1,266
|
||||
Deposits
|
(802
|
)
|
(1,471
|
)
|
||
Purchases
and development of real estate properties
|
(32,653
|
)
|
(21,959
|
)
|
||
Municipal
utility district reimbursements
|
4,551
|
6,229
|
||||
Decrease
in other assets
|
615
|
495
|
||||
Increase
(decrease) in accounts payable, accrued liabilities and
other
|
3,249
|
(2,554
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(26,214
|
)
|
(10,722
|
)
|
||
Cash
flow from investing activities:
|
||||||
Development
of commercial leasing properties
|
(27,262
|
)
|
(10,337
|
)
|
||
(Investment
in) return of investment in unconsolidated affiliate
|
(1,462
|
)
|
2,374
|
|||
Proceeds
from matured U.S. treasury securities
|
15,391
|
-
|
||||
Investment
in interest rate cap agreement
|
-
|
(673
|
)
|
|||
Other
|
53
|
25
|
||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(13,280
|
)
|
(8,611
|
)
|
||
Cash
flow from financing activities:
|
||||||
Borrowings
from revolving credit facility
|
15,000
|
-
|
||||
Payments
on revolving credit facility
|
(4,769
|
)
|
-
|
|||
Borrowings
from project and term loans
|
4,700
|
2,054
|
||||
Payments
on project and term loans
|
(488
|
)
|
(175
|
)
|
||
Noncontrolling
interest contributions
|
33,380
|
16,678
|
||||
Net
(payments for) proceeds from stock-based awards
|
(96
|
)
|
94
|
|||
Purchases
of Stratus common shares
|
(404
|
)
|
(517
|
)
|
||
Financing
costs
|
-
|
(2,845
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
47,323
|
15,289
|
||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
7,829
|
(4,044
|
)
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
17,097
|
40,873
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
24,926
|
$
|
36,829
|
||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
STRATUS PROPERTIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF EQUITY (Unaudited)
(In
Thousands)
Stratus
Stockholders’ Equity
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
|
Common
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital
in
|
Accum-
|
Other
|
Stock
|
Stratus
|
Noncontrolling
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Common
|
Excess
of
|
ulated
|
Comprehensive
|
Held
In
|
Stockholders’
|
Interest
in
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||
Stock
|
Par
Value
|
Deficit
|
Loss
|
Treasury
|
Equity
|
Subsidiary
|
Equity
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
$
|
83
|
$
|
196,692
|
$
|
(30,095
|
)
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
$
|
(17,441
|
)
|
$
|
149,236
|
$
|
25,286
|
$
|
174,522
|
|||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
-
|
593
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
593
|
-
|
593
|
||||||||||||||||
Tender
of shares for stock-based awards
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(96
|
)
|
(96
|
)
|
-
|
(96
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Purchases
of Stratus common shares
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(404
|
)
|
(404
|
)
|
-
|
(404
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Noncontrolling
interest contributions
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
33,380
|
33,380
|
||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income (loss):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
(4,734
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(4,734
|
)
|
(254
|
)
|
(4,988
|
)
|
||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
net
of taxes:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
gain on U.S. treasury securities
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3
|
-
|
3
|
-
|
3
|
||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3
|
-
|
3
|
-
|
3
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income (loss)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3
|
-
|
(4,731
|
)
|
(254
|
)
|
(4,985
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Balance
at September 30, 2009
|
$
|
83
|
$
|
197,285
|
$
|
(34,829
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(17,941
|
)
|
$
|
144,598
|
$
|
58,412
|
$
|
203,010
|
||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
$
|
81
|
$
|
195,898
|
$
|
(26,258
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(14,279
|
)
|
$
|
155,442
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
155,442
|
||||||
Exercised
and issued stock-based awards and other
|
1
|
(525
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(524
|
)
|
-
|
(524
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
-
|
895
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
895
|
-
|
895
|
||||||||||||||||
Tender
of shares for stock-based awards
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(596
|
)
|
(596
|
)
|
-
|
(596
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Purchases
of Stratus common shares
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(517
|
)
|
(517
|
)
|
-
|
(517
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Noncontrolling
interest contributions
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
16,678
|
16,678
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
(1,851
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(1,851
|
)
|
(188
|
)
|
(2,039
|
)
|
||||||||||||
Balance
at September 30, 2008
|
$
|
82
|
$
|
196,268
|
$
|
(28,109
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(15,392
|
)
|
$
|
152,849
|
$
|
16,490
|
$
|
169,339
|
||||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
STRATUS PROPERTIES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1.
|
GENERAL
|
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the
year ended December 31, 2008, included in Stratus Properties Inc.’s (Stratus)
Annual Report on Form 10-K (Stratus 2008 Form 10-K) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC). In the opinion of management, the accompanying
consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of
normal recurring items, except as described in Note 2) considered necessary for
a fair statement of the financial position of Stratus at September 30, 2009, and
the results of operations for the three-month and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, and cash flows for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008. Operating results for the three-month and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009, are not necessarily indicative of
the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31,
2009.
2.
|
REVISIONS
OF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
In
connection with reporting its financial results for the year ended December 31,
2008, Stratus reviewed its accounting policy with respect to capitalized
property taxes and determined that the manner in which it had previously
accounted for certain property taxes was not in accordance with accounting
guidance for costs of real estate projects.
Property
taxes are required to be capitalized as property costs only during periods in
which activities necessary to get the property ready for its intended use are in
progress. The guidance further states that the definition of these activities
has the same meaning as the definition used to determine interest
capitalization. Historically, Stratus capitalized property taxes rather than
charging them to expense on certain properties for which no development
activities were in progress.
As a
result, Stratus recalculated the appropriate amount of property taxes to be
charged to expense. In addition, Stratus determined the effect of the adjustment
to cost of sales and income taxes as previously reported. The cumulative impact
of this error through September 30, 2008, was primarily an overstatement of
previously reported net income.
Stratus
assessed the materiality of this item on the previously reported results for the
three-month period ended March 31, 2008, the three-month and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2008, the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30,
2008, and the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, in accordance with
the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 99 and concluded that the errors
were not material to such periods. Stratus concluded that the impact of
correcting the capitalized property tax item as a cumulative adjustment in the
year ended December 31, 2008, would have been misleading to the users of
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008. Accordingly, in
accordance with SAB No. 108, previously issued interim period financial
statements have been revised to correct for these items as such financial
statements were presented in SEC filings.
The
following tables set forth the line items affected by the revisions on Stratus’
statements of operations for the three-month and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2008 (in thousands, except per share amounts).
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|||||||||
As
|
Property
Tax
|
As
|
|||||||
Reported
|
Adjustments
|
Revised
|
|||||||
Total
cost of sales
|
$
|
(6,184
|
)
|
$
|
(149
|
)
|
$
|
(6,333
|
)
|
Operating
loss
|
(998
|
)
|
(149
|
)
|
(1,147
|
)
|
|||
Loss
from continuing operations
|
|||||||||
before
income taxes and equity
|
|||||||||
in
unconsolidated affiliate’s income
|
(789
|
)
|
(149
|
)
|
(938
|
)
|
|||
Benefit
from income taxes
|
216
|
52
|
268
|
||||||
Net
loss
|
(474
|
)
|
(97
|
)
|
(571
|
)
|
|||
Net
loss attributable to Stratus
|
|||||||||
common
stock
|
(350
|
)
|
(97
|
)
|
(447
|
)
|
|||
Basic
and diluted net loss per
|
|||||||||
share
of common stock
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|||||||||
As
|
Property
Tax
|
As
|
|||||||
Reported
|
Adjustments
|
Revised
|
|||||||
Total
cost of sales
|
$
|
(14,519
|
)
|
$
|
(538
|
)
|
$
|
(15,057
|
)
|
Operating
loss
|
(3,732
|
)
|
(538
|
)
|
(4,270
|
)
|
|||
Loss
from continuing operations
|
|||||||||
before
income taxes and equity
|
|||||||||
in
unconsolidated affiliate’s income
|
(2,421
|
)
|
(538
|
)
|
(2,959
|
)
|
|||
Benefit
from income taxes
|
469
|
191
|
660
|
||||||
Loss
from continuing operations
|
(1,587
|
)
|
(347
|
)
|
(1,934
|
)
|
|||
Net
loss
|
(1,692
|
)
|
(347
|
)
|
(2,039
|
)
|
|||
Net
loss attributable to Stratus
|
|||||||||
common
stock
|
(1,504
|
)
|
(347
|
)
|
(1,851
|
)
|
|||
Basic
and diluted net loss per
|
|||||||||
share
of common stock:
|
|||||||||
Continuing
operations
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
Discontinued
operations
|
(0.01
|
)
|
-
|
(0.01
|
)
|
||||
Basic
and diluted net loss per
|
|||||||||
share
of common stock
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
3.
|
EARNINGS
PER SHARE
|
Stratus’
basic and diluted net loss per share of common stock was calculated by dividing
the loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
period.
Stock
options and restricted stock units representing approximately 133,600 shares for
the third quarter of 2009, approximately 118,400 shares for the third quarter of
2008, approximately 133,800 shares for the first nine months of 2009 and
approximately 90,400 shares for the first nine months of 2008 that otherwise
would have been included in the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding were excluded because they were anti-dilutive.
4.
|
JOINT
VENTURE WITH CANYON-JOHNSON URBAN FUND II,
L.P.
|
Effective
May 1, 2008, Stratus entered into a joint venture with Canyon-Johnson Urban Fund
II, L.P. (Canyon-Johnson) for the development of a 36-story mixed-use
development in downtown Austin, Texas, anchored by a W Hotel & Residences
(the W Austin Hotel & Residences project). Stratus’ initial capital
contributions to the joint venture totaled $31.8 million, which consisted of
Stratus’ purchase of a 1.76 acre tract of land located across the street from
Austin City Hall, the related property and development agreements for the land
and other project costs incurred by Stratus before May 1, 2008.
Stratus
is the manager of, and has an approximate 40 percent interest in, the joint
venture. Canyon-Johnson has an approximate 60 percent interest in the joint
venture. In the aggregate, Canyon-Johnson will contribute approximately 60
percent of the joint venture’s required capital and Stratus will contribute
approximately 40 percent. As of September 30, 2009, capital contributions
totaled $42.2 million for Stratus and $59.1 million for
Canyon-Johnson.
On May 2,
2008, the joint venture entered into an agreement for a $165 million
construction loan with Corus Bank, N.A., (Corus) to finance the construction of
the W Austin Hotel & Residences project (see Note 9 of the Stratus 2008 Form
10-K). On February 18, 2009, Corus entered into a written agreement with the
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and a consent order with the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency, to maintain the financial soundness of Corus. On
June 26, 2009, the loan agreement with Corus was assigned to a subsidiary of
Stratus, which is managed by Stratus and Canyon-Johnson, in exchange for a pay
down of $250,000 of the outstanding principal balance of $2.1 million. As a
result, Corus was no longer the lender and in the second quarter of 2009 Stratus
recognized a $0.2 million loss on extinguishment of debt, which includes the
write-off of unamortized deferred loan costs in the amount of $2.1 million.
Subsequent to September 30, 2009, the joint venture entered into a new
construction loan (see Note 12).
On August
1, 2008, the joint venture paid $0.7 million to enter into an agreement to cap
the floating London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) on the Corus loan at 4.5
percent (see Note 5). The LIBOR cap notional amount varies based on originally
projected loan balances throughout the term of the Corus loan. The agreement
terminates on July 1, 2011.
A Stratus
subsidiary has been designated as the developer of the W Austin Hotel &
Residences project and will be paid a $6.0 million developer’s fee over the term
of construction. Stratus received development fees totaling $0.5 million in the
third quarter of 2009, $0.5 million in the third quarter of 2008, $1.4 million
in the first nine months of 2009 and $0.8 million in the first nine months of
2008, which have been eliminated in consolidation.
Stratus
performed an evaluation and concluded that the joint venture is a variable
interest entity (VIE) and that Stratus is currently the primary beneficiary,
even though it does not hold a controlling interest, as it is the developer of
the project, guarantees certain obligations of the joint venture and contributed
the land and development to the joint venture at formation. Accordingly, the W
Austin Hotel & Residences project has been consolidated in Stratus’
financial statements.
At
September 30, 2009, Stratus’ consolidated balance sheet includes $121.1 million
in total assets and $17.8 million in total liabilities, which are non-recourse
to the general assets of Stratus, associated with the W Austin Hotel &
Residences project. The $121.1 million of total assets included $0.2 million of
cash and cash equivalents, $55.7 million of property held for sale – developed
or under development, $56.1 million of property held for use and $9.1 million of
other assets. Certain triggering events, including when the VIE has additional
equity investment at risk, require a company to reconsider whether or not an
entity is still a VIE and also requires reconsideration of the primary
beneficiary. Therefore, as future capital contributions are made by
Canyon-Johnson and Stratus, Stratus will update its evaluation of whether the
joint venture is a VIE and whether Stratus is the primary beneficiary. If it is
determined that joint venture is no longer a VIE or that Stratus is no longer
the primary beneficiary of the entity, the entity would be deconsolidated from
Stratus’ financial statements and would be accounted for under the equity method
of accounting. Additionally, Stratus is reviewing recently issued accounting
guidance that may also impact its consolidation of the joint venture (see Note
11).
Profits
and losses between partners in a real estate venture are required to be
allocated based on how changes in net assets of the venture would affect cash
payments to the investors over the life of the venture and on its liquidation.
The amount of the ultimate profits earned by the W Austin Hotel & Residences
project will affect the ultimate profit sharing ratios because of provisions in
the joint venture agreement which would require Stratus to return certain
previously received distributions to Canyon-Johnson under certain circumstances.
Accordingly, the W Austin Hotel & Residences project’s cumulative profits or
losses are allocated based on a hypothetical liquidation of the venture’s net
assets as of each balance sheet date because of the uncertainty of the ultimate
profits and, therefore, profit-sharing ratios. At September 30, 2009, the
cumulative losses for the W Austin Hotel & Residences project were allocated
based on 43 percent for Stratus and 57 percent for
Canyon-Johnson.
5.
|
FAIR
VALUE MEASUREMENTS
|
Fair
value accounting guidance includes a fair value hierarchy that is intended to
increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related
disclosures. The fair value hierarchy is based on inputs to valuation techniques
that are used to measure fair value that are either observable or unobservable.
Observable inputs reflect assumptions market participants would use in pricing
an asset or liability based on market data obtained from independent sources
while unobservable inputs reflect a reporting entity’s pricing based upon their
own market assumptions.
The fair
value hierarchy consists of the following three levels:
Level 1 –
Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities.
Level 2 –
Inputs are quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in an active market,
quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are
not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable and
market-corroborated inputs which are derived principally from or corroborated by
observable market data.
Level 3 –
Inputs are derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant
inputs or value drivers are unobservable.
The
following table sets forth Stratus’ financial assets measured at fair value on a
recurring basis as of September 30, 2009, by level within the fair value
hierarchy (in thousands):
Quoted
Prices in
|
Significant
|
|||||||||||
Total
Fair Value
|
Active
Markets for
|
Significant
Other
|
Unobservable
|
|||||||||
Measurement
|
Identical
Assets
|
Observable
Inputs
|
Inputs
|
|||||||||
September
30, 2009
|
(Level
1)
|
(Level
2)
|
(Level
3)
|
|||||||||
Cash
equivalents
|
$
|
17,353
|
$
|
17,353
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Interest
rate cap
|
||||||||||||
agreement
|
96
|
-
|
96
|
-
|
||||||||
$
|
17,449
|
$
|
17,353
|
$
|
96
|
$
|
-
|
|||||
Valuation
Techniques
Cash Equivalents. Stratus has
investments in U.S. treasury securities, certificates of deposits and other
short-term securities with maturities less than 90 days, which are considered
cash equivalents. Stratus’ cash equivalent instruments are classified within
Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market
prices in active markets.
Interest Rate Cap Agreement.
On August 1, 2008, Stratus’ joint venture with Canyon-Johnson paid $0.7 million
to enter into an agreement to cap the floating LIBOR rate on its construction
loan at 4.5 percent. The joint venture entered into this derivative contract to
manage interest rate risk under the W Austin Hotel & Residences project
construction loan. Stratus accounts for this derivative pursuant to accounting
and reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument be recorded
in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value.
The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends
on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation. This
derivative is not designated as a hedging instrument. Stratus records this
interest rate cap agreement maturing July 2011 at fair value on a recurring
basis on its balance sheet (included in other assets) and recognizes changes in
fair value in current period earnings.
Stratus
uses an interest rate pricing model that relies on market observable inputs such
as LIBOR to measure the fair value of the interest rate cap agreement. Stratus
also evaluated the counterparty credit risk associated with the interest rate
cap agreement, which is considered a Level 3 input, but did not consider such
risk to be significant. Therefore, the interest rate cap agreement is classified
within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Stratus recorded a non-cash gain
(loss) totaling less than $(0.1) million for the third quarter of 2009, $(0.1)
million for the third quarter of 2008, less than $0.1 million for the first nine
months of 2009 and $(0.1) million for the first nine months of 2008 related to
the changes in fair value of the interest rate cap agreement.
Summarized
below are the carrying values and estimated fair values of financial assets and
liabilities (in thousands).
September
30, 2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
|||||||||||
Carrying
|
Fair
|
Carrying
|
Fair
|
|||||||||
Value
|
Value
|
Value
|
Value
|
|||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalentsa
|
$
|
24,926
|
$
|
24,926
|
$
|
17,097
|
$
|
17,097
|
||||
Restricted
casha
|
-
|
-
|
6
|
6
|
||||||||
Investment
in U.S. treasury
|
||||||||||||
securitiesa
|
-
|
-
|
15,388
|
15,388
|
||||||||
Accounts
and notes receivablea
|
616
|
616
|
1,245
|
1,245
|
||||||||
Interest
rate cap agreementb
|
96
|
96
|
63
|
63
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable, accrued
|
||||||||||||
liabilities,
accrued interest, and
|
||||||||||||
property
taxesa
|
15,253
|
15,253
|
9,788
|
9,788
|
||||||||
Debtc
|
75,951
|
72,146
|
63,352
|
55,809
|
||||||||
a.
|
Fair
value approximates the carrying amounts because of the short-term nature
of these instruments.
|
b.
|
Recorded
at fair value. Observable inputs, such as LIBOR, are used to determine
fair value (see above).
|
c.
|
Generally
recorded at cost. Fair value of substantially all of Stratus’ debt is
estimated based on discounted future expected cash flows at estimated
current interest rates. The fair value of debt does not represent the
amounts that will ultimately be paid upon the maturities of the
loans.
|
6.
|
INVESTMENT
IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATE
|
In 2005,
Stratus formed a joint venture with Trammell Crow Central Texas Development,
Inc. (Trammell Crow) to acquire an approximate 74-acre tract at the intersection
of Airport Boulevard and Lamar Boulevard in Austin, Texas, for $7.7 million. The
property, known as Crestview Station, is a single-family, multi-family, retail
and office development, which is located on the site of a future commuter rail
line approved by City of Austin voters. With Trammell Crow, Stratus has
completed environmental remediation, which the State of Texas certified as
complete in 2007, and permitting of the property. The initial phase of utility
and roadway infrastructure is complete.
In
connection with funding the development of Crestview Station, the joint venture
entered into a loan agreement in 2005 with Comerica Bank (Comerica) (the
Crestview loan agreement), pursuant to which the joint venture borrowed funds in
the principal amount of $7.6 million. In 2007, the joint venture amended the
Crestview loan agreement to increase the amount of availability under the loan
to $10.9 million. Stratus and Trammell Crow, the joint venture’s operating
partner, each executed guaranties of completion of certain environmental
remediation (which has been completed) and payment in connection with the
Crestview loan agreement. Each partner severally guaranteed the joint venture’s
principal payment obligations under the Crestview loan agreement up to a maximum
of $1.9 million each, plus certain interest payments and related
costs.
On August
20, 2009, Stratus and Trammell Crow entered into a fifth modification of the
Crestview loan agreement with an effective date of May 31, 2009. Prior to the
execution of the fifth loan modification, the joint venture paid $1.0 million to
Comerica to reduce the outstanding loan balance to $8.2 million. The
modification agreement extended the loan maturity date to May 31, 2012, and
lowered each joint venture partner’s guarantee from $1.9 million to $1.4
million. The principal amount of the loan was $8.2 million on September 30,
2009. To the extent the joint venture does not have funds available, Stratus and
Trammell Crow will equally fund monthly interest payments on the outstanding
loan balance and scheduled principal payments beginning in 2011.
Stratus
has a 50 percent interest in the Crestview Station project and accounts for it
under the equity method.
Crestview
Station sold substantially all of its multi-family and commercial properties in
2007 and one commercial site in the first quarter of 2008. Stratus’ equity in
Crestview Station’s (losses) earnings totaled
$(0.1)
million in the third quarter of 2009, $0.1 million in the third quarter of 2008,
$(0.3) million in the first nine months of 2009 and $0.4 million in the first
nine months of 2008. Stratus received distributions from Crestview Station
totaling $3.6 million in the first nine months of 2008. Summarized financial
information for Crestview Station follows (in thousands):
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
1,054
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
3,895
|
||||
Gross
profit (loss)
|
9
|
198
|
(13
|
)
|
694
|
|||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
(190
|
)
|
198
|
(554
|
)
|
730
|
||||||
7.
|
INTEREST
CAPITALIZATION
|
Stratus
capitalized all of its interest costs totaling $1.3 million in the third
quarters of 2009 and 2008, $4.0 million in the first nine months of 2009 and
$3.6 million in the first nine months of 2008.
8.
|
INCOME
TAXES
|
Companies
are required to determine an estimated annual effective tax rate to apply to
their interim pre-tax income or loss, and the estimated annual
effective rate is required to be revised, if necessary, to reflect the
company's best current estimate as of the end of each successive interim period
during the year. If a reliable estimate cannot be made, the actual effective tax
rate for the year-to-date period may be the best estimate of the annual
effective tax rate.
During
2008, Stratus concluded that estimating a consistent annual effective tax rate
was increasingly difficult because of the uncertainty in forecasting its taxable
income or loss since such amounts are primarily dependent upon asset sales which
are difficult to predict with reasonable certainty and may vary significantly
from period to period. Additionally, the ability to forecast is increasingly
difficult in light of the current economic environment. Stratus believes that
such uncertainty goes beyond normal market variations and forecasting an annual
effective rate would not provide a meaningful estimate. As such, Stratus
believes that the actual year-to-date effective tax rate is the best estimate of
the annual tax rate. Stratus’ benefit from income taxes has been calculated
utilizing its actual effective tax rate for the three-month and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2009.
After
considering the tax impact of the item discussed in Note 2, the difference
between Stratus’ consolidated effective income tax rates for the first nine
months of 2009 and 2008 and the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35 percent was
primarily attributable to state income tax expense and other permanent
items.
In its
ongoing assessment of the realizability of deferred tax assets, management
considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the
deferred tax assets will not be realized. Based on the expectation of future
taxable income and that deductible temporary differences will offset existing
taxable temporary differences, management believes it is more likely than not
that the benefits of these deductible differences, net of the existing valuation
allowances, are realizable at September 30, 2009. Such determination may change
in the future based on numerous factors, including the impact of the overall
economic environment on Stratus’ financial results.
The
following presents the change in gross unrecognized tax benefits during the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 (in thousands):
Balance
at January 1, 2009
|
$
|
2,664
|
||
Reductions
for prior year tax positions
|
(2,664
|
)
|
||
Balance
at September 30, 2009
|
$
|
-
|
During
the third quarter of 2009, Stratus reduced its unrecognized tax benefits by $2.7
million as a result of completing administrative processes with taxing
authorities related to the timing of certain deductions taken on its tax
returns. The reduction in its unrecognized tax benefits resulted in a
reclassification between other liabilities and deferred tax asset on the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. In connection with the reduction in
unrecognized tax benefits, Stratus recognized a benefit of less than $0.1
million for the reversal of interest expense.
9.
|
DISCONTINUED
OPERATIONS
|
In June
2008, Stratus revised the amount of Texas Margin Tax accrued on Escarpment
Village income earned during 2007. The revised accrual resulted in $0.1 million
of additional tax expense related to 2007, which was recognized in June 2008. As
the results of operations of Escarpment Village were appropriately classified as
discontinued operations, the additional Texas Margin Tax has also been
classified as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.
10.
|
BUSINESS
SEGMENTS
|
Stratus
has two operating segments, “Real Estate Operations” and “Commercial Leasing.”
The Real Estate Operations segment is comprised of all Stratus’ developed
properties, properties under development and undeveloped properties held for
sale in Austin, Texas, which consist of its properties in the Barton Creek
community, the Circle C community and Lantana, and certain portions of the W
Austin Hotel & Residences project. In January 2008, Stratus sold the final
lots of the Deerfield property in Plano, Texas, which was also included in the
Real Estate Operations segment. For definitions of these property
classifications, see “Properties” located in Item 2 of the Stratus 2008 Form
10-K.
The
Commercial Leasing segment primarily includes the two office buildings at 7500
Rialto Boulevard; building one was 71 percent leased and building two was 94
percent leased as of September 30, 2009. In addition, the commercial leasing
segment includes a retail building completed in 2007 and a bank building
completed in early 2008 in Barton Creek Village, two retail buildings completed
in the third quarter of 2008 in the Circle C community, and certain portions of
the W Austin Hotel & Residences project.
Stratus
uses operating income (loss) to measure the performance of each segment. Stratus
allocates general and administrative expenses between the segments based on
projected annual revenues for each segment. Accordingly, the following segment
information reflects management’s determinations that may not be indicative of
what actual financial performance of each segment would be if it were an
independent entity.
Segment
data presented below were prepared on the same basis as Stratus’ consolidated
financial statements.
Real
Estate Operationsa
|
Commercial
Leasing
|
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30,
2009
|
||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
2,181
|
$
|
1,163
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
3,344
|
||||
Cost
of sales, excluding depreciation
|
(2,710
|
)
|
(788
|
)
|
-
|
(3,498
|
)
|
|||||
Depreciation
|
(50
|
)
|
(353
|
)
|
-
|
(403
|
)
|
|||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
(1,134
|
)
|
(684
|
)
|
-
|
(1,818
|
)
|
|||||
Operating
loss
|
$
|
(1,713
|
)
|
$
|
(662
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(2,375
|
)
|
|
Capital
expenditures
|
$
|
12,079
|
$
|
12,024
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
24,103
|
||||
Total
assets at September 30, 2009
|
$
|
191,703
|
$
|
102,961
|
$
|
9,025
|
b
|
$
|
303,689
|
|||
Real
Estate Operationsa
|
Commercial
Leasing
|
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30,
2008
|
||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
5,751
|
$
|
1,158
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
6,909
|
||||
Cost
of sales, excluding depreciation
|
(4,954
|
)
|
(944
|
)
|
-
|
(5,898
|
)
|
|||||
Depreciation
|
(53
|
)
|
(382
|
)
|
-
|
(435
|
)
|
|||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
(1,482
|
)
|
(241
|
)
|
-
|
(1,723
|
)
|
|||||
Operating
loss
|
$
|
(738
|
)
|
$
|
(409
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(1,147
|
)
|
|
Capital
expenditures
|
$
|
4,503
|
$
|
2,166
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
6,669
|
||||
Total
assets at September 30, 2008
|
$
|
172,976
|
$
|
65,018
|
$
|
6,420
|
b
|
$
|
244,414
|
|||
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2009
|
||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
5,070
|
$
|
3,296
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
8,366
|
||||
Cost
of sales, excluding depreciation
|
(6,806
|
)
|
(2,405
|
)
|
-
|
(9,211
|
)
|
|||||
Depreciation
|
(176
|
)
|
(1,051
|
)
|
-
|
(1,227
|
)
|
|||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
(3,636
|
)
|
(2,196
|
)
|
-
|
(5,832
|
)
|
|||||
Operating
loss
|
$
|
(5,548
|
)
|
$
|
(2,356
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(7,904
|
)
|
|
Capital
expenditures
|
$
|
32,653
|
$
|
27,262
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
59,915
|
||||
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2008
|
||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
12,786
|
$
|
3,278
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
16,064
|
||||
Cost
of sales, excluding depreciation
|
(11,163
|
)
|
(2,683
|
)
|
-
|
(13,846
|
)
|
|||||
Depreciation
|
(147
|
)
|
(1,064
|
)
|
-
|
(1,211
|
)
|
|||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
(4,538
|
)
|
(739
|
)
|
-
|
(5,277
|
)
|
|||||
Operating
loss
|
$
|
(3,062
|
)
|
$
|
(1,208
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(4,270
|
)
|
|
Loss
from discontinued operations
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(105
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(105
|
)
|
||
Capital
expenditures
|
$
|
21,959
|
$
|
10,337
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
32,296
|
||||
a.
|
Includes
sales commissions, management fees and other revenues together with
related expenses.
|
b.
|
Primarily
includes deferred tax assets.
|
A
reconciliation of segment operating loss to loss from continuing operations
before income taxes and equity in unconsolidated affiliate’s (loss) income for
each period is as follows (in thousands):
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||
Operating
loss
|
$
|
(2,375
|
)
|
$
|
(1,147
|
)
|
$
|
(7,904
|
)
|
$
|
(4,270
|
)
|
Interest
income and other
|
66
|
330
|
894
|
1,432
|
||||||||
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
-
|
-
|
(182
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||
Gain
(loss) on interest rate cap agreement
|
(37
|
)
|
(121
|
)
|
33
|
(121
|
)
|
|||||
Loss
from continuing operations before
|
||||||||||||
income
taxes and equity in unconsolidated
|
||||||||||||
affiliate’s
(loss) income
|
$
|
(2,346
|
)
|
$
|
(938
|
)
|
$
|
(7,159
|
)
|
$
|
(2,959
|
)
|
11.
|
NEW
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
|
Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. In December 2007, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued accounting guidance
associated with consolidation, which clarifies that noncontrolling interests
(minority interests) are to be treated as a separate component of equity and any
changes in the ownership interest (in which control is retained) are to be
accounted for as capital transactions. However, a change in ownership of a
consolidated subsidiary that results in a loss of control is considered a
significant event that triggers gain or loss recognition, with the establishment
of a new fair value basis in any remaining ownership interests. The guidance
also provides additional disclosure requirements for each reporting period. This
guidance applies to fiscal years beginning on or
after
December 15, 2008, and is required to be adopted prospectively, except for the
following provisions, which have been applied retrospectively: (i) the
reclassification of noncontrolling interests to equity in the consolidated
balance sheets and (ii) the adjustment to consolidated net income or loss to
include net income or loss attributable to both the controlling and
noncontrolling interests. Stratus adopted this accounting guidance effective
January 1, 2009. Stratus adjusted its December 31, 2008, consolidated balance
sheet to reflect noncontrolling interest in the amount of $25.3 million as a
component of equity and adjusted its consolidated net loss for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008, to reflect $0.2 million of its previously reported
minority interest in net loss of consolidated subsidiary as net loss
attributable to noncontrolling interest.
Disclosures
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. In March 2008, FASB
issued accounting guidance associated with derivatives and hedging, which amends
the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities.
Under the guidance, entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about
(i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (ii) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for and (iii) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position,
financial performance and cash flows. The guidance is effective for fiscal years
and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. Stratus’ adoption of this
guidance, effective January 1, 2009, did not have a significant impact on its
financial reporting and disclosures.
Interim
Disclosures about Fair Value. In April 2009, FASB issued accounting
guidance associated with financial instruments, which requires disclosures by
publicly traded companies about the fair value of financial instruments for
interim periods as well as in annual financial statements. This guidance is
effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and was
adopted by Stratus beginning in the second quarter of 2009.
Subsequent
Events. In May 2009, FASB issued accounting guidance associated with
subsequent events, which introduces the concept of financial statements being
available to be issued. This guidance requires the disclosure of the date
through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis of that
date, that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements
were issued or were available to be issued. For SEC registrants this date will
continue to be the date in which financial statements are filed with the SEC.
This guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods ending after
June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. Stratus adopted this
accounting guidance effective in the second quarter of 2009.
Consolidations.
In May 2009, FASB issued accounting guidance to replace the quantitative-based
risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise, if any, has a
controlling financial interest in a VIE with an approach focused on identifying
which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most
significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (1) the obligation to
absorb expected losses of the entity or (2) the right to receive
expected residual returns from the entity. It also requires ongoing assessments
of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Additionally, this
guidance amends the consideration of related party relationships in the
determination of the primary beneficiary of a VIE by providing, among other
things, an exception with respect to de facto agency relationships in certain
circumstances. This guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2009. Stratus is currently evaluating the impact
that the adoption of this guidance will have on its financial reporting and
disclosures, including the possible deconsolidation of the W Austin Hotel &
Residences project.
Accounting
Standards Codification. In June 2009, FASB established the FASB
Accounting Standards Codification as the source of authoritative accounting
principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in
the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) in the U.S. Rules and interpretive releases of the
SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative
U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. This guidance is effective for interim and annual
reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009, except for certain nonpublic
nongovernmental entities. Stratus’ adoption of this guidance, in the third
quarter of 2009, did not have a material impact on its financial
statements.
12.
|
SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
|
As
discussed in Note 4, on June 26, 2009, the $165 million construction loan
agreement with Corus to finance the construction of the W Austin Hotel &
Residences project was assigned to a subsidiary of Stratus, which is managed by
Stratus and Canyon-Johnson. On October 21, 2009, the subsidiary assigned and
transferred the construction loan agreement documents to Beal Bank Nevada (Beal
Bank). In connection with the assignment, the joint venture between Stratus and
Canyon-Johnson executed an amended and restated loan agreement, an amended and
restated promissory note and related loan documents with Beal Bank (Beal Bank
loan agreement). Pursuant to the Beal Bank loan agreement, the joint venture may
borrow up to an aggregate of $120 million to fund the construction, development
and marketing costs of the W Austin Hotel & Residences project.
Amounts
borrowed under the Beal Bank loan agreement will bear interest at an annual rate
equal to The Wall Street Journal Prime Rate, as it changes from time to time,
plus 6¼ percent. The outstanding principal is due at maturity on October 21,
2014.
Borrowed
amounts may not be prepaid, in whole or in part, prior to the third anniversary
of the date of the first disbursement of loan proceeds to the joint venture
after October 21, 2009. Borrowed amounts may be prepaid in whole or in part
following the third anniversary and on or prior to the fourth anniversary,
subject to a prepayment fee equal to one percent of the amount of principal
being prepaid. Optional prepayments made after the fourth anniversary are not
subject to prepayment premiums or fees. In addition, as and when residential
condominium units are sold, all net sales proceeds (as defined under the Beal
Bank loan agreement) from the sale of the residential units and all net
operating income (as defined under the Beal Bank loan agreement) must be offered
to Beal Bank as a principal prepayment under the loan agreement. Beal Bank, in
its sole discretion, may at any time elect to accept or reject any offered
prepayments.
The Beal
Bank loan agreement contains customary financial covenants, including a
requirement that Stratus maintain a minimum total stockholders’ equity balance
of $120.0 million, and other restrictions. The full payment and performance
obligations under the loan agreement have been guaranteed by each of Stratus and
Canyon-Johnson.
An
initial advance under the Beal Bank loan agreement of $3.4 million was made at
closing. The next advance is expected to occur in mid-2010 and thereafter
advances are expected to be made monthly until the loan is fully funded. As a
condition to further funding from the Beal Bank loan agreement, the joint
venture must invest at least $180 million. Previously, when Corus was the
construction lender, the joint venture was required to invest total equity of
$128 million ($53 million from Stratus and $75 million from Canyon-Johnson). As
a result of changing construction lenders, $52 million of additional equity is
now required. The joint venture is currently pursuing third parties to fund all
or a portion of the $52 million. To the extent acceptable third-party or other
financing is not secured, the joint venture may be obligated to fund the
additional capital necessary to meet the $180 million pre-funding requirement
under the Beal Bank loan agreement.
During
the fourth quarter of 2009, Stratus will update its evaluation of whether the
joint venture is still a VIE after considering the Beal Bank loan agreement. If
Stratus concludes that the joint venture is no longer a VIE, this would result
in the joint venture being deconsolidated in its financial statements and
Stratus’ investment being adjusted to fair value.
Stratus
evaluated events after September 30, 2009 and through November 6, 2009, which is
the date the financial statements were issued, and determined that any events or
transactions occurring during this period that would require recognition or
disclosure are appropriately reflected in Stratus’ financial statements and the
notes thereto.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
OVERVIEW
Management’s
discussion and analysis presented below should be read in conjunction with our
discussion and analysis of financial results contained in our 2008 Annual Report
on Form 10-K (2008 Form 10-K) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) and with “Note 2. Revisions of Previously Issued Consolidated Financial
Statements” included in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
contained elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The operating results
summarized in this report are not necessarily indicative of our future operating
results. All subsequent references to “Notes” refer to Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements (unaudited), unless otherwise stated.
We are
engaged in the acquisition, development, management, operations and sale of
commercial, multi-family and residential real estate properties located
primarily in the Austin, Texas area. We primarily generate revenues from sales
of developed properties and through rental income from our commercial
properties. Developed property sales can include an individual tract of land
that has been developed and permitted for residential use or a developed lot
with a home already built on it. We may, on occasion, sell properties under
development or undeveloped properties, if opportunities arise that we believe
will maximize overall asset values.
Our
principal real estate holdings are in southwest Austin, Texas. The number of
developed lots, developed or under development acreage and undeveloped acreage
as of September 30, 2009, are presented in the following table.
Acreage
|
|||||||||||||||||
Developed
or Under Development
|
Undeveloped
|
||||||||||||||||
Developed
|
Single
|
Multi-
|
Single
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Lots
|
Family
|
family
|
Commercial
|
Total
|
Family
|
Commercial
|
Total
|
Acreage
|
|||||||||
Austin
|
|||||||||||||||||
Barton
Creek
|
122
|
358
|
249
|
368
|
975
|
510
|
28
|
538
|
1,513
|
||||||||
Lantana
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
223
|
223
|
223
|
||||||||
Circle
C
|
59
|
a
|
-
|
-
|
265
|
265
|
148
|
a
|
122
|
270
|
535
|
||||||
W
Austin Hotel
|
|||||||||||||||||
&
Residences
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
b
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
|||||||
San Antonio
|
|||||||||||||||||
Camino
Real
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
||||||||
Total
|
181
|
358
|
249
|
635
|
1,242
|
658
|
375
|
1,033
|
2,275
|
||||||||
a.
|
Relates
to Meridian, an 800-lot residential
development.
|
b.
|
Represents
a city block in downtown Austin planned for a mixture of hotel,
residential, retail, office and entertainment
uses.
|
Our other
Austin holdings at September 30, 2009, consisted of two 75,000-square-foot
office buildings at 7500 Rialto Boulevard (7500 Rialto) located in our Lantana
development, a 22,000-square-foot retail complex representing phase one of
Barton Creek Village and two retail buildings totaling 21,000 square feet at the
5700 Slaughter project in the Circle C community.
The sharp
decline in activity in the real estate market, among other factors,
significantly impacted our consolidated financial results. In the third quarter
of 2009, our revenues totaled $3.3 million and our net loss attributable to
common stock totaled $1.6 million, compared with revenues of $6.9 million and a
net loss attributable to common stock of $0.4 million for the third quarter of
2008. For the first nine months of 2009, our revenues totaled $8.4 million and
our net loss attributable to common stock totaled $4.7 million, compared with
revenues of $16.1 million and a net loss attributable to common stock of $1.9
million for the first nine months of 2008. Our financial condition and results
of operations are highly dependent upon market conditions for real estate
activity in Austin, Texas. Our future operating cash flows and, ultimately, our
ability to develop our properties and expand our business will be largely
dependent on the level of our real estate sales. In turn, these sales will be
significantly affected by future real estate market conditions in Austin, Texas,
including development costs, interest rate levels, the availability of credit to
finance real estate transactions, demand for residential and commercial real
estate, and regulatory factors including our land use and development
entitlements.
Recent
economic conditions have also resulted in a general decline in leasing activity
across the United States (U.S.), and have caused vacancy rates to increase in
most markets, including Austin, Texas. Investment sales activity in the U.S.
declined sharply during 2008 because of, among other factors, limited
availability and increased cost of financing, especially the absence of
securitized debt, which was the source of heightened investment activity, and
the resulting gap between buyer and seller expectations of value.
Periods
of economic slowdown or recession, rising interest rates, tightening of the
credit markets, declining demand for or increased supply of real estate, or the
public perception that any of these events may occur can adversely affect our
business. These conditions could result in a general decline in rents, which in
turn would reduce revenue from leases. In addition, these conditions could lead
to a decline in property values as well as a decline in funds invested in
commercial real estate and related assets, which in turn may reduce revenues
from leases and development fees.
U.S.
credit markets have yet to fully recover, and this lingering problem is
impacting the broader U.S. economy. Commercial real estate lenders have
substantially tightened underwriting standards or have withdrawn from the
lending market, materially impacting liquidity in the real estate debt markets,
making financing terms for owners of retail properties less attractive, and in
certain cases resulting in the unavailability of certain types of debt
financing. Tighter lending standards and higher borrowing costs have exerted
downward pressure on the value and liquidity of real estate assets which will
impact the values we could obtain from the sale of our properties. These factors
may make it more difficult for us to sell properties or may adversely affect the
price we receive for properties that we do sell, as prospective buyers may
experience increased costs of debt financing or difficulties in obtaining such
financing. Our future performance will, in part, be dependent upon the recovery
of the credit markets and the underlying strength of the U.S.
economy.
BUSINESS
STRATEGY
Over the
past several years, we have successfully worked cooperatively with the City of
Austin (the City) to obtain approvals that allow the development of our
properties to proceed in a timely manner while protecting the environment. We
believe the desirable location and overall quality of our properties, in
combination with the land use and development entitlements we have obtained,
will under normal market conditions command a premium over the value of other
Austin-area properties.
Our
long-term success will depend on our ability to maximize the value of our real
estate through obtaining required approvals that permit us to develop and sell
our properties in a timely manner at a reasonable cost. We must incur
significant development expenditures and secure additional permits prior to the
development and sale of certain properties. In addition, we continue to pursue
additional development opportunities, and currently believe we can obtain
financing necessary for developing our properties, although our ability to
obtain financing in the future may be impacted by current U.S. economic
conditions. See “Risk Factors” located in Item 1A of our 2008 Form
10-K.
REVISIONS
OF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As
discussed in Note 2, an accounting matter was identified in connection with the
preparation of our financial results for the year ended December 31, 2008, that
required revisions of our consolidated financial statements for the three-month
and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008. Management’s discussion and
analysis has been updated to discuss changes in comparative results of
operations after considering the impact of the item discussed in Note
2.
DEVELOPMENT
AND OTHER ACTIVITIES
W Austin Hotel & Residences.
In 2005, the City selected our proposal to develop a mixed-use project in
downtown Austin immediately north of the new City Hall complex. The W Austin
Hotel & Residences project includes an entire city block and is planned for
a mixture of hotel, residential, retail, office and entertainment uses. In 2006,
we acquired the property for $15.1 million. We have executed agreements with
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. for the development of a W Hotel
& Residences on the site. In May 2007, we announced our proposed partnership
with Canyon-Johnson Urban Fund II, L.P. (Canyon-Johnson) for the development of
the W Austin Hotel & Residences project. The grand opening
for the
onsite sales center was held in conjunction with the groundbreaking ceremony in
October 2007. Effective May 1, 2008, we entered into a joint venture with
Canyon-Johnson for the development of the project (see Note 4). A construction
loan with Corus Bank N.A. (Corus) was signed effective May 2, 2008. Construction
of the $300 million project commenced in the second quarter of 2008 and is
proceeding as scheduled.
On June
26, 2009, the construction loan agreement with Corus was assigned to a
subsidiary of Stratus, which is managed by Stratus and Canyon-Johnson, in
exchange for a pay down of $250,000 of the outstanding principal balance of $2.1
million. As a result, Corus was no longer the lender, and in the second quarter
of 2009, we recognized a $0.2 million loss on extinguishment of debt, which
includes the write-off of unamortized deferred loan costs in the amount of $2.1
million.
On
October 21, 2009, the subsidiary assigned and transferred the project
construction loan documents to Beal Bank Nevada (Beal Bank). In connection with
the assignment, the joint venture executed an amended and restated loan
agreement, an amended and restated promissory note and related loan documents
with Beal Bank (Beal Bank loan agreement). Pursuant to the Beal Bank loan
agreement, the joint venture may borrow up to an aggregate of $120 million to
fund the construction, development and marketing costs of the W Austin Hotel
& Residences project. An initial advance under the Beal Bank loan agreement
of $3.4 million was made at closing.
As of
September 30, 2009, capital contributions to the joint venture totaled $101.3
million, of which we contributed $42.2 million and Canyon-Johnson contributed
$59.1 million. The next advance under the Beal Bank loan agreement is expected
to occur in mid-2010 and thereafter advances are expected to be made monthly
until the loan is fully funded. As a condition to further funding from the Beal
Bank loan agreement, the joint venture must invest at least $180 million.
Previously, when Corus was the construction lender, the joint venture was
required to invest total equity of $128 million ($53 million from us and $75
million from Canyon-Johnson). As a result of changing construction lenders, $52
million of additional equity is now required. The joint venture is currently
pursuing third parties to fund all or a portion of the $52 million. To the
extent acceptable third-party or other financing is not secured, the joint
venture may be obligated to fund the additional capital necessary to meet the
$180 million pre-funding requirement under the Beal Bank loan
agreement.
Crestview Station. In 2005,
we formed a joint venture with Trammell Crow to acquire an approximate 74-acre
tract at the intersection of Airport Boulevard and Lamar Boulevard in Austin,
Texas, for $7.7 million. The property, known as Crestview Station, is a
single-family, multi-family, retail and office development, which is located on
the site of a future commuter rail line approved by City of Austin voters. With
Trammell Crow, we have completed environmental remediation, which the State of
Texas certified as complete in 2007, and permitting of the property. The initial
phase of utility and roadway infrastructure is complete. Crestview Station sold
substantially all of its multi-family and commercial properties in 2007 and one
commercial site in the first quarter of 2008. The joint venture retained the
single-family component of Crestview Station and one commercial site. The joint
venture is currently processing permits to develop Crestview Station as a
450-unit transit-oriented neighborhood. At September 30, 2009, our investment in
the Crestview Station project totaled $3.5 million and the joint venture
partnership had $8.2 million of outstanding debt, of which we guarantee $1.4
million. To the extent the joint venture does not have funds available, we and
Trammell Crow will equally fund monthly interest payments on the outstanding
loan balance and scheduled principal payments beginning in 2011.
Residential. As of September
30, 2009, the number of our residential developed lots, lots under development
and potential development by area are shown below (excluding lots and units
associated with our Canyon-Johnson and Crestview Station joint
ventures):
Residential
Lots
|
|||||||
Developed
|
Under
Development
|
Potential
Development
a
|
Total
|
||||
Barton
Creek:
|
|||||||
Calera:
|
|||||||
Calera
Court Courtyard Homes
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
|||
Calera
Drive
|
8
|
-
|
-
|
8
|
|||
Verano
Drive
|
67
|
-
|
-
|
67
|
|||
Amarra
Drive:
|
|||||||
Phase
I Lots
|
7
|
-
|
-
|
7
|
|||
Phase
II Lots
|
35
|
-
|
-
|
35
|
|||
Phase
II and III Townhomes
|
-
|
-
|
221
|
221
|
|||
Phase
III
|
-
|
89
|
-
|
89
|
|||
Mirador
Estate
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
|||
Wimberly
Lane Phase II
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
|||
Section
N Multi-familyb
|
-
|
-
|
1,860
|
1,860
|
|||
Other
Barton Creek Sections
|
-
|
-
|
154
|
154
|
|||
Circle
C:
|
|||||||
Meridian
|
59
|
-
|
57
|
116
|
|||
Total
Residential Lots
|
181
|
89
|
2,292
|
2,562
|
|||
a.
|
Our
development of the properties identified under the heading “Potential
Development” is dependent upon the approval of our development plans and
permits by governmental agencies, including the City. Those governmental
agencies may either not approve one or more development plans and permit
applications related to such properties or require us to modify our
development plans. Accordingly, our development strategy with respect to
those properties may change in the future. The timing for development of
these properties has not been determined. While we may be
proceeding with approved infrastructure projects on some of these
properties, they are not considered to be “under development” for
disclosure in this table unless other development activities necessary to
fully realize the properties’ intended final use are in progress or
scheduled to commence in the near
term.
|
b.
|
Represents
1,860 potential units on 174 acres.
|
Calera. Calera is a
residential subdivision with plat approval for 155 lots. During 2004, we began
construction of 16 courtyard homes at Calera Court, the 16-acre initial phase of
the Calera subdivision. The second phase of Calera, Calera Drive, consisting of
53 single-family lots, many of which adjoin the Fazio Canyons Golf Course,
received final plat and construction permit approval in 2005. Construction of
the final phase, known as Verano Drive, was completed in July 2008 and includes
71 single-family lots. As of September 30, 2009, two courtyard homes at Calera
Court, eight lots at Calera Drive and 67 lots at Verano Drive remained
unsold.
Amarra Drive. Amarra
Drive Phase I, which is the initial phase of the Amarra Drive subdivision, was
completed in 2007 and includes eight lots with sizes ranging from approximately
one to four acres, some of which are course-side lots on the Fazio Canyons Golf
Course and others are secluded lots adjacent to the Nature Conservancy of Texas.
In 2008, we commenced development of Amarra Drive Phase II, which consists of 35
lots on 51 acres. Development was substantially completed in October 2008, but
no sales have occurred.
Mirador Estate. The
Mirador subdivision consists of 34 estate lots, with each lot averaging
approximately 3.5 acres in size. As of September 30, 2009, two Mirador estate
lots remained unsold.
Wimberly Lane.
Wimberly Lane included two phases, with phase one consisting of 75 residential
lots and phase two consisting of 47 residential lots. As of September 30, 2009,
one Wimberly Lane lot remained unsold.
Circle C. We are developing the
Circle C community based on the entitlements secured in our Circle C settlement
with the City. Our Circle C settlement, as amended in 2004, permits development
of 1.16 million square feet of commercial space, 504 multi-family units and 830
single family residential lots. Meridian is an 800-lot residential development
at the Circle C community. Development of Meridian included our contracts with
three national homebuilders to complete the construction and sales of 494 lots.
As of September 30, 2009, 30 lots remained unsold and 24 lots are expected to be
sold in the fourth
quarter
of 2009 for $1.6 million. The remaining six lots are expected to be sold for
$0.4 million in the first quarter of 2010.
In 2006,
we signed another contract with a national homebuilder for 42 additional lots.
Development of those lots was substantially completed in April 2008. In June
2009, the contract was terminated by the homebuilder. As of the date the
contract was terminated, there were 30 remaining lots. In connection with the
termination, the homebuilder forfeited a deposit of $0.6 million, which we
recorded as other income in the second quarter of 2009. We are currently
pursuing development contracts with other homebuilders for the remaining lots.
One lot was sold in August 2009 for $0.1 million and 29 lots remained unsold as
of September 30, 2009. The final phase of Meridian is expected to consist of 57
one-acre lots.
Commercial. As of September
30, 2009, the number of square feet of our commercial property developed, under
development and our potential development are shown below (excluding property
associated with our Canyon-Johnson and Crestview Station joint
ventures):
Commercial
Property
|
|||||||
Developed
|
Under
Development
|
Potential
Development
a
|
Total
|
||||
Barton
Creek:
|
|||||||
Barton
Creek Village Phase I
|
22,000
|
-
|
-
|
22,000
|
|||
Barton
Creek Village Phase II
|
-
|
-
|
18,000
|
18,000
|
|||
Entry
Corner
|
-
|
-
|
5,000
|
5,000
|
|||
Amarra
Retail/Office
|
-
|
-
|
90,000
|
90,000
|
|||
Section
N
|
-
|
-
|
1,500,000
|
1,500,000
|
|||
Circle
C:
|
|||||||
Chase
Ground Lease
|
4,000
|
-
|
-
|
4,000
|
|||
Tract
106
|
21,000
|
-
|
-
|
21,000
|
|||
Tract
107
|
-
|
80,000
|
-
|
80,000
|
|||
Tract
110
|
-
|
-
|
760,000
|
760,000
|
|||
Tract
101
|
-
|
-
|
90,000
|
90,000
|
|||
Tract
102
|
-
|
-
|
25,000
|
25,000
|
|||
Tract
114
|
-
|
-
|
5,000
|
5,000
|
|||
Lantana:
|
|||||||
7500
Rialto
|
150,000
|
-
|
-
|
150,000
|
|||
Advanced
Micro Devices
|
|||||||
Option
Tracts
|
-
|
-
|
760,000
|
760,000
|
|||
Tract
GR1
|
-
|
-
|
325,000
|
325,000
|
|||
Tract
G07
|
-
|
-
|
210,000
|
210,000
|
|||
Tract
CS5
|
-
|
-
|
175,000
|
175,000
|
|||
Tract
CS1-CS3
|
-
|
-
|
150,000
|
150,000
|
|||
Tract
LR1
|
-
|
-
|
75,000
|
75,000
|
|||
Tract
L04
|
-
|
-
|
70,000
|
70,000
|
|||
Austin
290 Tract
|
-
|
-
|
20,000
|
20,000
|
|||
Total
Square Feet
|
197,000
|
80,000
|
4,278,000
|
4,555,000
|
|||
a.
|
Our
development of the properties identified under the heading “Potential
Development” is dependent upon the approval of our development plans and
permits by governmental agencies, including the City. Those governmental
agencies may either not approve one or more development plans and permit
applications related to such properties or require us to modify our
development plans. Accordingly, our development strategy with respect to
those properties may change in the future. The timing for development of
these properties has not been determined. While we may be
proceeding with approved infrastructure projects on some of these
properties, they are not considered to be “under development” for
disclosure in this table unless other development activities necessary to
fully realize the properties’ intended final use are in progress or
scheduled to commence in the near
term.
|
Barton Creek. The
first phase of the Barton Creek Village includes a 22,000-square-foot retail
complex and a 3,300-square-foot bank building within this retail complex. As of
September 30, 2009, the retail complex was 84 percent leased and the bank
building is leased through 2022.
Circle C. During the
third quarter of 2008, we completed the construction of two retail buildings,
totaling 21,000 square feet, at the 5700 Slaughter project. This retail project
also includes a 4,000-square-foot bank building on an existing ground lease.
Leasing for the two retail buildings is under way with 32 percent of the
21,000-square-foot retail complex leased as of September 30, 2009. We expect the
21,000-square-foot retail complex to be substantially leased by the end of
2009.
The
Circle C community also includes Parkside Village, an 80,000-square-foot planned
retail project. The project will be developed in two phases. The first phase
will consist of a 34,000-square-foot building to accommodate a full-service
restaurant and theater. The second phase will consist of three tilt-wall retail
buildings at 14,775 square feet, 8,075 square feet and 7,600 square feet, and
two pads available for ground leases. We are pursuing final permits and
entitlements to position the project for commencement of construction when
appropriate.
Lantana.
Lantana is a partially developed, mixed-use real-estate development project.
Lantana includes two 75,000-square-foot office buildings at 7500 Rialto. As of
September 30, 2009, occupancy was 71 percent for the original office building
and 94 percent for the second office building. We are actively pursuing
tenants to fill the available office space at this property. As of
September 30, 2009, we had remaining entitlements for approximately 1.0 million
square feet of office and retail use on 223 acres. Regional utility and road
infrastructure is in place with capacity to serve Lantana at full build-out
permitted under our existing entitlements.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
We are
continually evaluating the development potential of our properties and
considering opportunities to enter into transactions involving our properties.
As a result, and because of numerous other factors affecting our business
activities as described herein, our past operating results are not necessarily
indicative of our future results.
Summary
operating results follow (in thousands):
Third
Quarter
|
Nine
Months
|
|||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||
Real
estate operations
|
$
|
2,181
|
$
|
5,751
|
$
|
5,070
|
$
|
12,786
|
||||
Commercial
leasing
|
1,163
|
1,158
|
3,296
|
3,278
|
||||||||
Total
revenues
|
$
|
3,344
|
$
|
6,909
|
$
|
8,366
|
$
|
16,064
|
||||
Operating
loss
|
$
|
(2,375
|
)
|
$
|
(1,147
|
)
|
$
|
(7,904
|
)
|
$
|
(4,270
|
)
|
Benefit
from income taxes
|
$
|
844
|
$
|
268
|
$
|
2,448
|
$
|
660
|
||||
Net
loss attributable to Stratus common stock
|
$
|
(1,553
|
)
|
$
|
(447
|
)
|
$
|
(4,734
|
)
|
$
|
(1,851
|
)
|
We have
two operating segments, “Real Estate Operations” and “Commercial Leasing” (see
Note 10). The following is a discussion of our operating results by
segment.
Real Estate
Operations
Summary
operating results for real estate operations follow (in thousands):
Third
Quarter
|
Nine
Months
|
|||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||
Developed
property sales
|
$
|
2,116
|
$
|
5,691
|
$
|
4,201
|
$
|
11,953
|
||||
Undeveloped
property sales
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
41
|
||||||||
Commissions,
management fees and other
|
65
|
60
|
869
|
792
|
||||||||
Total
revenues
|
2,181
|
5,751
|
5,070
|
12,786
|
||||||||
Cost
of sales, including depreciation
|
(2,760
|
)
|
(5,007
|
)
|
(6,982
|
)
|
(11,310
|
)
|
||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
(1,134
|
)
|
(1,482
|
)
|
(3,636
|
)
|
(4,538
|
)
|
||||
Operating
loss
|
$
|
(1,713
|
)
|
$
|
(738
|
)
|
$
|
(5,548
|
)
|
$
|
(3,062
|
)
|
Developed Property Sales.
Residential property sales for the third-quarter and nine-month periods
of 2009 and 2008 included the following (revenues in thousands):
Third
Quarter
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Lots
|
Revenues
|
Lots
|
Revenues
|
|||||
Barton
Creek
|
||||||||
Calera
Court Courtyard Homes
|
1
|
$
549
|
1
|
$
643
|
||||
Verano
Drive
|
1
|
450
|
3
|
1,875
|
||||
Circle
C
|
||||||||
Meridian
|
16
|
1,117
|
48
|
3,173
|
||||
Total
Residential
|
18
|
$
2,116
|
52
|
$
5,691
|
||||
Nine
Months
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Lots
|
Revenues
|
Lots
|
Revenues
|
|||||
Barton
Creek
|
||||||||
Calera
Court Courtyard Homes
|
2
|
$
1,149
|
2
|
$ 1,278
|
||||
Wimberly
Lane Phase II
|
||||||||
Standard
Homebuilder
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
265
|
a
|
|||
Verano
Drive
|
1
|
450
|
3
|
1,875
|
||||
Circle
C
|
||||||||
Meridian
|
39
|
2,602
|
103
|
7,125
|
||||
Deerfieldb
|
-
|
-
|
21
|
1,410
|
||||
Total
Residential
|
42
|
$
4,201
|
130
|
$
11,953
|
||||
a.
|
Includes
$0.1 million for homebuilder contract termination
fee.
|
b.
|
In
2004, we acquired the Deerfield property in Plano, Texas, for $7.0
million. We executed agreements with a national homebuilder, whereby the
homebuilder paid us $1.4 million for an option to purchase all 234 lots
over 36 monthly take-downs. In 2005, we executed a revised agreement with
the homebuilder, increasing the lot sizes and average purchase price to
$67,150 based on a new total of 224 lots. In January 2008, we sold the
final 21 lots for $1.4 million.
|
The
decrease in developed property sales revenues to $2.1 million for the third
quarter of 2009 and $4.2 million for the first nine months of 2009, from $5.7
million for the third quarter of 2008 and $12.0 million for the first nine
months of 2008 resulted from a lower number of lots sold primarily caused by
deterioration of demand and available financing in the real estate market as
further discussed under “Overview.” Although real estate market conditions have
resulted in fewer lot sales, we have not made significant changes to our lot
prices.
Cost of Sales. Cost of sales
totaled $2.8 million for the third quarter of 2009, $5.0 million for the third
quarter of 2008, $7.0 million for the first nine months of 2009 and $11.3
million for the first nine months of 2008, and includes cost of property sold,
ongoing project expenses and allocated overhead costs, partially offset by
reductions for certain Municipal Utility District (MUD) reimbursements.
Accordingly, while profit margins on developed property sales remain positive,
the inclusion of ongoing project expenses and allocated overhead costs in cost
of sales results in a negative gross margin. Most of the sales for the 2009 and
2008 periods were Circle C lots, which have lower profit margins than Barton
Creek lots. Cost of sales also included reductions for Barton Creek MUD
reimbursements totaling less than $0.1 million for the third quarter and first
nine months of 2009 and $0.1 million for the first nine months of
2008.
We are
projecting continued lower levels of lot sales in the next several quarters
because of the continued weakness in the U.S. and Austin real estate
markets.
General and Administrative Expenses.
Consolidated general and administrative expenses increased to $1.8
million for the third quarter of 2009 from $1.7 million for the third quarter of
2008, and increased to $5.8 million for the first nine months of 2009 from $5.3
million for the first nine months of 2008, primarily because of higher fees for
professional services associated with SEC filings. General and administrative
expenses
allocated to real estate operations decreased to $1.1 million for the third
quarter of 2009 from $1.5 million for the third quarter of 2008, and decreased
to $3.6 million for the first nine months of 2009 from $4.5 million for the
first nine months of 2008 primarily as a result of a lower allocation of general
and administrative expenses to the real estate operations segment in 2009
because of lower projected real estate operations revenues.
Commercial
Leasing
Summary
commercial leasing operating results follow (in thousands):
Third
Quarter
|
Nine
Months
|
|||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||
Rental
income
|
$
|
1,163
|
$
|
1,158
|
$
|
3,296
|
$
|
3,278
|
||||
Rental
property costs
|
(788
|
)
|
(944
|
)
|
(2,405
|
)
|
(2,683
|
)
|
||||
Depreciation
|
(353
|
)
|
(382
|
)
|
(1,051
|
)
|
(1,064
|
)
|
||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
(684
|
)
|
(241
|
)
|
(2,196
|
)
|
(739
|
)
|
||||
Operating
loss
|
$
|
(662
|
)
|
$
|
(409
|
)
|
$
|
(2,356
|
)
|
$
|
(1,208
|
)
|
Rental Income. While rental
income for the 2009 periods approximated the 2008 periods, rental income from
7500 Rialto was $0.1 million lower in each of the 2009 periods because of higher
vacancies, compared to the 2008 periods; however, these 2009 decreases were
offset by additional rental income from the new leases in 2009 at Barton Creek
Village and 5700 Slaughter.
Rental Property Costs. Rental
property costs decreased to $0.8 million for the third quarter of 2009 from $0.9
million for the third quarter of 2008 and $2.4 million for the first nine months
of 2009 from $2.7 million for the first nine months of 2008. The decrease in
rental property costs in the 2009 periods is primarily the result of a decrease
in personnel and operating costs associated with the property management
function, which was outsourced to a third party in the fourth quarter of 2008.
The decrease in the 2009 nine-month period was partly offset by higher costs
from 5700 Slaughter, which commenced operations in July 2008.
General and Administrative Expenses.
General and administrative expenses from commercial leasing increased to
$0.7 million for the third quarter of 2009 from $0.2 million for the third
quarter of 2008, and increased to $2.2 million for the first nine months of 2009
from $0.7 million for the first nine months of 2008, primarily as a result of a
lower allocation of general and administrative expenses to the real estate
operations segment in 2009 because of lower projected real estate operations
revenues.
Non-Operating
Results
Interest Income and Other.
Interest income totaled $0.1 million in the third quarter of 2009, $0.3
million in the third quarter of 2008, $0.3 million in the first nine months of
2009 and $1.4 million in the first nine months of 2008. The decrease in interest
income in the first nine months of 2009 primarily reflects $0.6 million less of
Barton Creek MUD reimbursements. Interest income included interest on Barton
Creek MUD reimbursements totaling $0.1 million in the third quarter of 2009,
$0.2 million in the third quarter of 2008, $0.3 million in the first nine months
of 2009 and $0.9 million in the first nine months of 2008. Additionally, the
decrease in interest income reflects a decrease in average cash balances during
the 2009 periods compared to the 2008 periods.
We
recorded other income of $0.6 million in the first nine months of 2009 for a
forfeited deposit in connection with the termination of a homebuilder contract
for certain lots in the Circle C community.
Loss on Extinguishment of
Debt. We recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.2 million in the
first nine months of 2009, reflecting the assignment of the W Austin Hotel &
Residences construction loan to a Stratus subsidiary (see Note 4).
Gain (Loss) on Interest Rate Cap
Agreement. We recognized a loss on the interest rate cap agreement of
less than $0.1 million in the third quarter of 2009, a gain of less than $0.1
million in the first nine months 2009, and losses of $0.1 million in the 2008
periods, reflecting the impact of changing interest rates on the fair value of
this derivative instrument (see Note 5).
Equity in Unconsolidated Affiliate’s
(Loss) Income. We account for our 50 percent interest in our
unconsolidated affiliate, Crestview Station, using the equity method. Crestview
Station sold substantially
all of
its multi-family and commercial properties in 2007 and one commercial site in
the first quarter of 2008. Our equity in Crestview Station’s (losses) earnings
decreased to $(0.1) million for the third quarter of 2009 from $0.1 million for
the third quarter of 2008, and decreased to $(0.3) million for the first nine
months of 2009 from $0.4 million for the first nine months of 2008. The decrease
in our equity in Crestview Station’s (losses) earnings primarily reflects the
losses recognized by Crestview Station in the 2009 periods, as there were no
sales during the first nine months of 2009.
Benefit from Income Taxes. We
recorded an income tax benefit of $0.8 million for the third quarter of 2009,
$0.3 million for the third quarter of 2008, $2.4 million for the first nine
months of 2009 and $0.7 million for the first nine months of 2008. The
difference between our consolidated effective income tax rates for the first
nine months of 2009 and 2008 and the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35 percent
was primarily attributable to state income tax expense and other permanent
items.
Net Loss Attributable to
Noncontrolling Interest in Subsidiary. Net loss attributable to
nonconrolling interest in subsidiary totaled less than $0.1 million in the third
quarter of 2009, $0.1 million in the third quarter of 2008, $0.3 million in the
first nine months of 2009 and $0.2 million in the first nine months of 2008
related to the W Austin Hotel & Residences project (see Note
4).
CAPITAL
RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
At
September 30, 2009, we had $24.9 million in cash and cash equivalents and $31.8
million in availability under our $45 million revolving credit facility, which
matures in May 2010. In May 2009, we began making additional capital
contributions to the W Austin Hotel & Residences project joint venture.
Through September 30, 2009, we have funded $42.2 million and Canyon-Johnson has
funded $59.1 million. Without additional
financing, the joint venture may be obligated to fund approximately $79 million
for the project costs after October 1, 2009, until funds under the Beal Bank
loan agreement are available. The joint venture is actively seeking other
financing options to fund the balance of the project costs that will not be
funded by the construction loan once we and Canyon-Johnson have funded the
required capital commitments (see Notes 4 and 12).
Comparison of Nine-Months
2009 and 2008 Cash Flows
Cash used
in operating activities increased to $26.2 million during the first nine months
of 2009, compared with $10.7 million during the first nine months of 2008,
primarily because of a $7.8 million decrease in proceeds from developed property
sales, a $10.7 million increase in cash used in development of real estate
properties, a $1.7 million decrease in MUD reimbursements and a $1.3 million
distribution of income from our unconsolidated affiliate, Crestview Station,
received in the first nine months of 2008. As stated previously, the continued
weakness in the U.S. real estate market has negatively affected sales of lots,
and we expect this trend to continue in the near-term. Expenditures for
purchases and development of real estate properties for the first nine months of
2009 and 2008 included development costs for properties held for sale, including
the residential portion of the W Austin Hotel & Residences project ($26.6
million in 2009 and $10.4 million in 2008), and the Barton Creek, Lantana and
Circle C communities. We received Barton Creek MUD reimbursements totaling $4.6
million in the first nine months of 2009 and $6.2 million in the first nine
months of 2008. Capital expenditures for the W Austin Hotel & Residences
project, including both residential and commercial leasing expenditures, are
expected to approximate $26 million for the fourth quarter of 2009 and $110
million for the year 2010.
Cash used
in investing activities totaled $13.3 million during the first nine months of
2009 and $8.6 million during the first nine months of 2008. Commercial leasing
development expenditures for the first nine months of 2009 and 2008 included
development costs for the W Austin Hotel & Residences project totaling $26.8
million in 2009 and $9.7 million in 2008. Other expenditures for commercial
leasing properties primarily related to Barton Creek Village in the 2008 period.
We also contributed capital of $1.5 million to Crestview Station in the first
nine months of 2009 and received distributions representing a partial return of
our investment in Crestview Station totaling $2.4 million in the first nine
months of 2008. Crestview Station generated proceeds from sales in the 2008
period but had no sales or cash proceeds in the 2009 period. In addition, we
received proceeds from matured U.S. treasury securities of $15.4 million in the
first nine months of 2009.
Cash
provided by financing activities totaled $47.3 million during the first nine
months of 2009, which included $33.4 million of noncontrolling interest
contributions from Canyon-Johnson for the W Austin Hotel & Residences
project, $10.2 million in net borrowings from our revolving credit facility and
$4.7 million in
net
borrowings from the Barton Creek Village term loan. Other debt repayments
totaled $0.5 million, including a $250,000 payment to terminate the W Austin
Hotel & Residences project loan with Corus (see “Development and Other
Activities”). In the first nine months of 2009, we used $0.4 million to
repurchase shares of our common stock on the open market (see below). Cash
provided by financing activities totaled $15.3 million during the first nine
months of 2008, which included $16.7 million of noncontrolling interest
contributions from Canyon-Johnson for the W Austin Hotel & Residences
project and $2.1 million of borrowings from the W Austin Hotel & Residences
project loan, partly offset by $2.8 million of financing costs. In the first
nine months of 2008, we used $0.5 million to repurchase shares of our common
stock.
In 2001,
our Board of Directors approved an open market share purchase program for up to
0.7 million shares of our common stock. During the third quarter of 2009, there
were no purchases under this program. A total of 161,145 shares remain available
under this program as of September 30, 2009. Our loan agreement with Comerica
provides a limit of $6.5 million for common stock purchases after September 30,
2005, of which $0.9 million remained at September 30, 2009. The timing of future
purchases of our common stock is dependent on many factors including the price
of our common shares, our cash flows and financial position, and general
economic and market conditions.
Credit Facility and Other
Financing Arrangements
At
September 30, 2009, we had total debt of $76.0 million, compared with $63.4
million at December 31, 2008. Our debt outstanding at September 30, 2009
consisted of the following:
·
|
$10.2
million of borrowings outstanding and $2.9 million of letters of credit
issued under our $45.0 million revolving credit facility with Comerica,
resulting in availability of approximately $31.8 million. The revolving
credit facility matures in May
2010.
|
·
|
$40.0
million of borrowings outstanding under seven unsecured term loans, which
include two $5.0 million loans, two $8.0 million loans, a $7.0 million
loan and two $3.5 million loans, all of which will mature in December
2011.
|
·
|
$21.1
million of borrowings outstanding under the Lantana promissory note, which
matures in January 2018.
|
·
|
$4.7
million of borrowings outstanding under a term loan secured by Barton
Creek Village. The note bears interest at 6.25 percent per annum and
matures in April 2014. Payments of interest and principal are due monthly
beginning May 1, 2009.
|
Pursuant
to an October 21, 2009, loan agreement with Beal Bank, the joint venture for the
W Austin Hotel & Residences may borrow up to an aggregate of $120 million to
fund the construction, development and marketing costs. Amounts borrowed under
the Beal Bank loan agreement will bear interest at an annual rate equal to The
Wall Street Journal Prime Rate, as it changes from time to time, plus 6¼
percent. The outstanding principal is due at maturity on October 21, 2014 (see
Note 12).
NEW
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Refer to
Note 11 for discussion of new accounting standards.
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT
Our
discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements regarding future
reimbursements for infrastructure costs, future events related to financing and
regulatory matters, projected capital expenditures, the expected results of our
business strategy, and other plans and objectives of management for future
operations and activities. Important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from our expectations include economic and business
conditions, business opportunities that may be presented to and pursued by us,
changes in laws or regulations and other factors, many of which are beyond our
control, and other factors that are described in more detail under “Risk
Factors” located in our 2008 Form 10-K.
Item 4. Controls and
Procedures.
(a) Evaluation of disclosure
controls and procedures. Our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, with the participation of management, have evaluated the effectiveness
of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15(d)-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) and determined that our
controls and procedures were effective as of the end of September 30,
2009.
(b) Changes in internal
control. There was no change in our internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2009, that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity
Securities and Use of Proceeds.
The
following table sets forth shares of our common stock we repurchased during the
three months ended September 30, 2009.
(a)
Total
|
(c)
Total Number of
|
(d)
Maximum Number
|
||||||
Number
|
(b)
Average
|
Shares
Purchased as Part
|
of
Shares That May
|
|||||
of
Shares
|
Price
Paid
|
of
Publicly Announced
|
Yet
Be Purchased Under
|
|||||
Period
|
Purchased
|
Per
Share
|
Plans
or Programsa
|
the
Plans or Programsa
|
||||
July
1 to 31, 2009
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
161,145
|
||||
August
1 to 31, 2009
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
161,145
|
||||
September
1 to 30, 2009
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
161,145
|
||||
Total
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
a.
|
In
February 2001, our Board of Directors approved an open market share
purchase program for up to 0.7 million shares of our common stock. The
program does not have an expiration date. Our loan agreement with Comerica
provides a limit of $6.5 million for common stock purchases after
September 30, 2005. At September 30, 2009, $0.9 million remained under the
Comerica agreement for purchases of common
stock.
|
Item 6. Exhibits.
The
exhibits to this report are listed in the Exhibit Index beginning on page E-1
hereof.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
STRATUS
PROPERTIES INC.
By: /s/
Erin D. Pickens
----------------------------------------
Erin D.
Pickens
Senior
Vice President and
Chief
Financial Officer
(authorized
signatory and
Principal
Financial Officer)
Date: November
6, 2009
STRATUS PROPERTIES INC.
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Filed
|
||||||
Exhibit
|
with
this
|
Incorporated
by Reference
|
||||
Number
|
Exhibit
Title
|
Form
10-Q
|
Form
|
File
No.
|
Date
Filed
|
|
3.1
|
Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Stratus.
|
10-Q
|
000-19989
|
05/17/2004
|
||
3.2
|
Certificate
of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
Stratus, dated May 14, 1998.
|
10-Q
|
000-19989
|
05/17/2004
|
||
3.3
|
Certificate
of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
Stratus, dated May 25, 2001.
|
10-K
|
000-19989
|
03/22/2002
|
||
3.4
|
By-laws
of Stratus, as amended as of November 6, 2007.
|
10-Q
|
000-19989
|
08/11/2008
|
||
Amended
and Restated Construction Loan Agreement dated October 21, 2009, by and
between CJUF II Stratus Block 21 LLC and Beal Bank Nevada.
|
X
|
|||||
Amended
and Restated Promissory Note dated October 21, 2009, by and between CJUF
II Stratus Block 21 LLC and Beal Bank Nevada.
|
X
|
|||||
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
|
X
|
|||||
Certification
of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
|
X
|
|||||
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350.
|
X
|
|||||
Certification
of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350.
|
X
|
|||||
_______________________
Note: Certain
instruments with respect to long-term debt of Stratus have not been filed as
exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q since the total amount of
securities authorized under any such instrument does not exceed 10 percent of
the total assets of Stratus and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
Stratus agrees to furnish a copy of each such instrument upon request of the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
E-1