STRATUS PROPERTIES INC - Quarter Report: 2016 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES | |||
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION | |||
Washington, D.C. 20549 | |||
FORM 10-Q | |||
(Mark One) | |||
[X] | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE | ||
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |||
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016 | |||
or | |||
[ ] | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE | ||
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |||
For the transition period from to | |||
Commission File Number: 001-37716 | |||
Stratus Properties Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 72-1211572 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
212 Lavaca St., Suite 300 | |
Austin, Texas | 78701 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(512) 478-5788 | |
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code) | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
þ Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). þ Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes þ No
On July 29, 2016, there were issued and outstanding 8,092,140 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share.
STRATUS PROPERTIES INC. | |
TABLE OF CONTENTS | |
Page | |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
STRATUS PROPERTIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
(In Thousands)
June 30, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | ||||||
ASSETS | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 10,566 | $ | 17,036 | |||
Restricted cash | 10,081 | 8,731 | |||||
Real estate held for sale | 24,323 | 25,944 | |||||
Real estate under development | 122,386 | 139,171 | |||||
Land available for development | 13,711 | 23,397 | |||||
Real estate held for investment, net | 238,984 | 186,626 | |||||
Deferred tax assets | 15,367 | 15,329 | |||||
Other assets | 18,840 | 13,871 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 454,258 | $ | 430,105 | |||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | |||||||
Liabilities: | |||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 12,000 | $ | 14,182 | |||
Accrued liabilities | 12,018 | 10,356 | |||||
Debt | 288,143 | 260,592 | |||||
Other liabilities | 9,414 | 8,301 | |||||
Total liabilities | 321,575 | 293,431 | |||||
Commitments and contingencies | |||||||
Equity: | |||||||
Stockholders’ equity: | |||||||
Common stock | 92 | 91 | |||||
Capital in excess of par value of common stock | 192,586 | 192,122 | |||||
Accumulated deficit | (39,310 | ) | (35,144 | ) | |||
Common stock held in treasury | (20,760 | ) | (20,470 | ) | |||
Total stockholders’ equity | 132,608 | 136,599 | |||||
Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries | 75 | 75 | |||||
Total equity | 132,683 | 136,674 | |||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 454,258 | $ | 430,105 |
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2
STRATUS PROPERTIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||||
Hotel | $ | 10,658 | $ | 11,054 | $ | 21,233 | $ | 22,673 | |||||||
Entertainment | 4,903 | 4,995 | 9,046 | 9,304 | |||||||||||
Commercial leasing | 2,141 | 1,703 | 4,194 | 3,524 | |||||||||||
Real estate operations | 1,448 | 2,234 | 3,703 | 4,710 | |||||||||||
Total revenues | 19,150 | 19,986 | 38,176 | 40,211 | |||||||||||
Cost of sales: | |||||||||||||||
Hotel | 7,676 | 8,295 | 15,357 | 16,377 | |||||||||||
Entertainment | 3,775 | 3,688 | 6,819 | 7,091 | |||||||||||
Commercial leasing | 1,043 | 959 | 1,905 | 1,700 | |||||||||||
Real estate operations | 1,889 | 2,011 | 4,098 | 4,121 | |||||||||||
Depreciation | 1,983 | 2,346 | 3,665 | 4,650 | |||||||||||
Total cost of sales | 16,366 | 17,299 | 31,844 | 33,939 | |||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 4,146 | 2,145 | 7,221 | 4,121 | |||||||||||
Total costs and expenses | 20,512 | 19,444 | 39,065 | 38,060 | |||||||||||
Operating (loss) income | (1,362 | ) | 542 | (889 | ) | 2,151 | |||||||||
Interest expense, net | (2,346 | ) | (1,031 | ) | (4,315 | ) | (1,881 | ) | |||||||
Loss on interest rate derivative instruments | (101 | ) | (13 | ) | (475 | ) | (68 | ) | |||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | — | — | (837 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Other income, net | 4 | 285 | 8 | 289 | |||||||||||
(Loss) income before income taxes and equity in unconsolidated affiliates' (loss) income | (3,805 | ) | (217 | ) | (6,508 | ) | 491 | ||||||||
Equity in unconsolidated affiliates' (loss) income | (25 | ) | (239 | ) | 73 | (118 | ) | ||||||||
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes | 1,347 | 216 | 2,269 | (47 | ) | ||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations | (2,483 | ) | (240 | ) | (4,166 | ) | 326 | ||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes | — | — | — | 3,218 | |||||||||||
Net (loss) income | (2,483 | ) | (240 | ) | (4,166 | ) | 3,544 | ||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries | — | (879 | ) | — | (1,921 | ) | |||||||||
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders | $ | (2,483 | ) | $ | (1,119 | ) | $ | (4,166 | ) | $ | 1,623 | ||||
Basic and diluted net (loss) income per share attributable to common stockholders: | |||||||||||||||
Continuing operations | $ | (0.31 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.52 | ) | $ | (0.20 | ) | |||
Discontinued operations | — | — | — | 0.40 | |||||||||||
Basic and diluted net (loss) income per share attributable to common stockholders | $ | (0.31 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.52 | ) | $ | 0.20 | ||||
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding: | |||||||||||||||
Basic | 8,092 | 8,061 | 8,082 | 8,051 | |||||||||||
Diluted | 8,092 | 8,061 | 8,082 | 8,081 |
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
STRATUS PROPERTIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME (Unaudited)
(In Thousands)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
Net (loss) income | $ | (2,483 | ) | $ | (240 | ) | $ | (4,166 | ) | $ | 3,544 | ||||
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes: | |||||||||||||||
Gain on interest rate swap agreement | — | 182 | — | 19 | |||||||||||
Other comprehensive income | — | 182 | — | 19 | |||||||||||
Total comprehensive (loss) income | (2,483 | ) | (58 | ) | (4,166 | ) | 3,563 | ||||||||
Total comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests | — | (952 | ) | — | (1,926 | ) | |||||||||
Total comprehensive (loss) income attributable to common stockholders | $ | (2,483 | ) | $ | (1,010 | ) | $ | (4,166 | ) | $ | 1,637 | ||||
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
STRATUS PROPERTIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(In Thousands)
Six Months Ended | |||||||
June 30, | |||||||
2016 | 2015 | ||||||
Cash flow from operating activities: | |||||||
Net (loss) income | $ | (4,166 | ) | $ | 3,544 | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash used in operating activities: | |||||||
Depreciation | 3,665 | 4,650 | |||||
Cost of real estate sold | 1,691 | 2,098 | |||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | 837 | — | |||||
Loss on interest rate derivative contracts | 475 | 68 | |||||
Debt issuance cost amortization and stock-based compensation | 698 | 777 | |||||
Gain on sale of 7500 Rialto, net of tax | — | (3,218 | ) | ||||
Equity in unconsolidated affiliates' (income) loss | (73 | ) | 118 | ||||
Deposits | 21 | 82 | |||||
Deferred income taxes | (38 | ) | 47 | ||||
Purchases and development of real estate properties | (7,629 | ) | (15,703 | ) | |||
Municipal utility district reimbursement | — | 5,307 | |||||
Increase in other assets | (5,843 | ) | (383 | ) | |||
Increase in accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other | 98 | 2,022 | |||||
Net cash used in operating activities | (10,264 | ) | (591 | ) | |||
Cash flow from investing activities: | |||||||
Capital expenditures | (22,435 | ) | (16,740 | ) | |||
Other, net | (17 | ) | 62 | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (22,452 | ) | (16,678 | ) | |||
Cash flow from financing activities: | |||||||
Borrowings from credit facility | 12,000 | 23,500 | |||||
Payments on credit facility | (3,139 | ) | (15,366 | ) | |||
Borrowings from project loans | 168,875 | 15,810 | |||||
Payments on project and term loans | (150,345 | ) | (9,662 | ) | |||
Stock-based awards net payments, including excess tax benefit | (158 | ) | (144 | ) | |||
Noncontrolling interests distributions | — | (1,040 | ) | ||||
Financing costs | (987 | ) | — | ||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 26,246 | 13,098 | |||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (6,470 | ) | (4,171 | ) | |||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 17,036 | 29,645 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 10,566 | $ | 25,474 |
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), which include information regarding noncash transactions, are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
STRATUS PROPERTIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY (Unaudited)
(In Thousands)
Stockholders’ Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accum- ulated Other Compre- hensive Loss | Common Stock Held in Treasury | Total Stockholders' Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Capital in Excess of Par Value | Accum-ulated Deficit | Noncontrolling Interests in Subsidiaries | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Shares | At Par Value | Number of Shares | At Cost | Total Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2015 | 9,160 | $ | 91 | $ | 192,122 | $ | (35,144 | ) | $ | — | 1,093 | $ | (20,470 | ) | $ | 136,599 | $ | 75 | $ | 136,674 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercised and issued stock-based awards | 37 | 1 | (1 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | — | — | 333 | — | — | — | — | 333 | — | 333 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit for stock-based awards | — | — | 132 | — | — | — | — | 132 | — | 132 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tender of shares for stock-based awards | — | — | — | — | — | 12 | (290 | ) | (290 | ) | — | (290 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive loss | — | — | — | (4,166 | ) | — | — | — | (4,166 | ) | — | (4,166 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2016 | 9,197 | $ | 92 | $ | 192,586 | $ | (39,310 | ) | $ | — | 1,105 | $ | (20,760 | ) | $ | 132,608 | $ | 75 | $ | 132,683 |
Balance at December 31, 2014 | 9,116 | $ | 91 | $ | 204,269 | $ | (47,321 | ) | $ | (279 | ) | 1,081 | $ | (20,317 | ) | $ | 136,443 | $ | 38,643 | $ | 175,086 | |||||||||||||||||
Exercised and issued stock-based awards | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | — | — | 269 | — | — | — | — | 269 | — | 269 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit for stock-based awards | — | — | 8 | — | — | — | — | 8 | — | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tender of shares for stock-based awards | — | — | — | — | — | 12 | (153 | ) | (153 | ) | — | (153 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests distributions | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (1,040 | ) | (1,040 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | — | — | — | 1,623 | 14 | — | — | 1,637 | 1,926 | 3,563 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2015 | 9,153 | $ | 91 | $ | 204,546 | $ | (45,698 | ) | $ | (265 | ) | 1,093 | $ | (20,470 | ) | $ | 138,204 | $ | 39,529 | $ | 177,733 |
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
STRATUS PROPERTIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. | GENERAL |
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2015, included in Stratus Properties Inc.’s (Stratus) Annual Report on Form 10-K (Stratus 2015 Form 10-K) filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring items) considered necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods reported. Operating results for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016.
2. | EARNINGS PER SHARE |
Stratus’ basic net (loss) income per share of common stock was calculated by dividing the net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding during the period. A reconciliation of net (loss) income and weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding for purposes of calculating diluted net (loss) income per share (in thousands, except per share amounts) follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
Net (loss) income | $ | (2,483 | ) | $ | (240 | ) | $ | (4,166 | ) | $ | 3,544 | |||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries | — | (879 | ) | — | (1,921 | ) | ||||||||||
Net (loss) income attributable to Stratus common stockholders | $ | (2,483 | ) | $ | (1,119 | ) | $ | (4,166 | ) | $ | 1,623 | |||||
Basic weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding | 8,092 | 8,061 | 8,082 | 8,051 | ||||||||||||
Add shares issuable upon exercise or vesting of dilutive stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs) | — | a | — | b | — | a | 30 | b | ||||||||
Diluted weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding | 8,092 | 8,061 | 8,082 | 8,081 | ||||||||||||
Basic and diluted net (loss) income per share attributable to common stockholders | $ | (0.31 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.52 | ) | $ | 0.20 |
a. Excludes approximately 123 thousand shares of common stock for second-quarter 2016 and 124 thousand shares of common stock for the first six months of 2016 associated with outstanding stock options with exercise prices less than the average market price of Stratus' common stock and RSUs that were anti-dilutive.
b. Excludes approximately 26 thousand shares of common stock for second-quarter 2015 and 31 thousand shares of common stock for the first six months of 2015 associated with RSUs that were anti-dilutive.
Outstanding stock options with exercise prices greater than the average market price for Stratus' common stock during the period are excluded from the computation of diluted net (loss) income per share of common stock. Excluded stock options totaled approximately 15 thousand for both the second quarter and first six months of 2016, 25 thousand for second-quarter 2015 and 26 thousand for the first six months of 2015.
3. | FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS |
Fair value accounting guidance includes a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 inputs) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs).
The carrying value for certain Stratus financial instruments (i.e., cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities) approximates fair value because of their short-term nature and generally negligible credit losses.
7
A summary of the carrying amount and fair value of Stratus' other financial instruments follows (in thousands):
June 30, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||||
Carrying Value | Fair Value | Carrying Value | Fair Value | ||||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||||
Interest rate cap agreement | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | |||||||
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreement | 1,120 | 1,120 | 646 | 646 | |||||||||||
Debt | 288,143 | 290,522 | 260,592 | 263,303 |
Interest Rate Cap Agreement. On September 30, 2013, Stratus’ joint venture with Canyon-Johnson Urban Fund II, L.P. (the Block 21 Joint Venture) paid $0.5 million to enter into an interest rate cap agreement, which capped the one-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), the variable rate in the Bank of America loan agreement relating to the W Austin Hotel & Residences (the BoA loan), at 1 percent until October 5, 2014, 1.5 percent from October 6, 2014, to October 4, 2015, and 2 percent from October 5, 2015, to September 29, 2016 (see Note 4 for additional information regarding repayment of the BoA loan in January 2016). Stratus uses an interest rate pricing model that relies on market observable inputs such as LIBOR to measure the fair value of the interest rate cap agreement. Stratus also evaluated the counterparty credit risk associated with the interest rate cap agreement, which is considered a Level 3 input, but did not consider such risk to be significant. Therefore, the interest rate cap agreement is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Interest Rate Swap Agreement. On December 13, 2013, Stratus' joint venture with LCHM Holdings, LLC, formerly Moffett Holdings, LLC, for the development of Parkside Village (the Parkside Village Joint Venture), entered into an interest rate swap agreement with Comerica Bank that Stratus had designated as a cash flow hedge with changes in fair value of the instrument recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). The instrument effectively converted the variable rate portion of the Parkside Village Joint Venture's loan from Comerica Bank (the Parkside Village loan) from one-month LIBOR to a fixed rate of 2.3 percent. In connection with the sale of the Parkside Village property on July 2, 2015, Stratus fully repaid the amount outstanding under the Parkside Village loan. Stratus assumed the interest rate swap agreement and, as a result, the instrument no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. Accordingly, the accumulated other comprehensive loss balance of $0.6 million on July 2, 2015, was reclassified to the Consolidated Statement of Operations as a loss on interest rate derivative instruments, and changes in the fair value of the instrument are being recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Operations (including a loss of $0.1 million in second-quarter 2016 and $0.5 million for the first six months of 2016). Stratus also evaluated the counterparty credit risk associated with the interest rate swap agreement, which is considered a Level 3 input, but did not consider such risk to be significant. Therefore, the interest rate swap agreement is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Debt. Stratus' debt is recorded at cost and is not actively traded. Fair value is estimated based on discounted future expected cash flows at estimated current market interest rates. Accordingly, Stratus' debt is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of debt does not represent the amounts that will ultimately be paid upon the maturities of the loans.
4. | DEBT |
The components of Stratus' debt are as follows:
June 30, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | |||||||
Goldman Sachs loan | $ | 147,906 | $ | — | ||||
BoA loan | — | 128,230 | ||||||
Lakeway construction loan | 52,477 | 45,931 | ||||||
Comerica credit facility | 42,010 | 53,149 | ||||||
Santal construction loan | 28,388 | 15,874 | ||||||
Diversified Real Asset Income Fund (DRAIF) term loan | 7,997 | 7,993 | ||||||
Barton Creek Village term loan | 5,623 | 5,689 | ||||||
Magnolia loan | 3,742 | 3,726 | ||||||
Total debta | $ | 288,143 | $ | 260,592 |
8
a. | Includes net reductions for unamortized debt issuance costs of $2.4 million at June 30, 2016, and $2.5 million at December 31, 2015. See Note 7 for a discussion of a change in presentation of debt issuance costs. |
On January 5, 2016, Stratus completed the refinancing of the W Austin Hotel & Residences. Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company provided a $150.0 million, ten-year, non-recourse term loan (the Goldman Sachs loan) with a fixed interest rate of 5.58 percent per annum and payable monthly based on a 30-year amortization. Stratus used the proceeds from the Goldman Sachs loan to fully repay its existing obligations under the BoA loan and the $20.0 million Comerica term loan included as part of the Comerica credit facility.
The obligations of Stratus Block 21, LLC (Block 21), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Stratus and borrower under the Goldman Sachs loan, are secured by all assets owned from time to time by Block 21. Additionally, certain obligations of Block 21 under the Goldman Sachs loan are guaranteed by Stratus, including environmental indemnification and other customary carve-out obligations. In connection with any acceleration of the Goldman Sachs loan, Block 21 must pay a yield maintenance premium in the amount of at least three percent of the amount of indebtedness prepaid. Prepayment of the Goldman Sachs loan is not permitted except (1) for certain prepayments resulting from casualty or condemnation and (2) in whole within 90 days of the maturity date. For a description of Stratus' other loans, refer to Note 7 in the Stratus 2015 Form 10-K.
Interest Expense and Capitalization. Interest expense (before capitalized interest) totaled $3.9 million for second-quarter 2016, $2.3 million for second-quarter 2015, $7.6 million for the first six months of 2016 and $4.6 million for the first six months of 2015. Stratus' capitalized interest costs totaled $1.6 million for second-quarter 2016, $1.3 million for second-quarter 2015, $3.3 million for the first six months of 2016 and $2.7 million for the first six months of 2015. Capitalized interest costs for the 2016 and 2015 periods primarily related to development activities at Barton Creek and The Oaks at Lakeway.
5. | INCOME TAXES |
Stratus’ accounting policy for and other information regarding its income taxes is further described in Notes 1 and 8 in the Stratus 2015 Form 10-K.
Stratus had deferred tax assets (net of deferred tax liabilities) totaling $15.4 million at June 30, 2016, and $15.3 million at December 31, 2015. Stratus’ future results of operations may be negatively impacted by an inability to realize a tax benefit for future tax losses or for items that will generate additional deferred tax assets.
The difference between Stratus' consolidated effective income tax rate for the first six months of 2016, and the U.S. Federal statutory income tax rate of 35 percent, was primarily attributable to the state margin tax. The difference between Stratus' consolidated effective income tax rate for the first six months of 2015, and the U.S. Federal statutory income tax rate of 35 percent, was primarily attributable to the state margin tax partially offset by the tax effect of income attributable to noncontrolling interests.
6. | BUSINESS SEGMENTS |
Stratus currently has four operating segments: Hotel, Entertainment, Commercial Leasing and Real Estate Operations.
The Hotel segment includes the W Austin Hotel located at the W Austin Hotel & Residences.
The Entertainment segment includes ACL Live, a live music and entertainment venue and production studio at the W Austin Hotel & Residences. In addition to hosting concerts and private events, this venue is the home of Austin City Limits, a television program showcasing popular music legends. The Entertainment segment also includes revenues and costs associated with events hosted at other venues, including the recently opened 3TEN ACL Live, which opened in March 2016 on the site of the W Austin Hotel & Residences, and the results of the Stageside Productions joint venture with Pedernales Entertainment LLC (see Note 2 in the Stratus 2015 Form 10-K for further discussion).
The Commercial Leasing segment includes the office and retail space at the W Austin Hotel & Residences, a retail building and a bank building in Barton Creek Village, a retail property at The Oaks at Lakeway and the Santal multi-family project. On July 2, 2015, Stratus completed the sales of the Parkside Village and 5700 Slaughter properties, which were included in the Commercial Leasing segment.
9
The Real Estate Operations segment is comprised of Stratus’ real estate assets (developed, under development and available for development), which consists of its properties in Austin, Texas (the Barton Creek community, the Circle C community, Lantana and the condominium units at the W Austin Hotel & Residences); in Lakeway, Texas (The Oaks at Lakeway) located in the greater Austin area; in Magnolia, Texas located in the greater Houston area; and in Killeen, Texas (The West Killeen Market).
Stratus uses operating income or loss to measure the performance of each segment. General and administrative expenses primarily consist of employee salaries, wages and other costs, and beginning January 1, 2016, are managed on a consolidated basis and are not allocated to Stratus' operating segments. The segment disclosures for the 2015 periods have been recast to be consistent with the presentation of the 2016 periods. The following segment information reflects management determinations that may not be indicative of what the actual financial performance of each segment would be if it were an independent entity.
Segment data presented below were prepared on the same basis as Stratus’ consolidated financial statements (in thousands).
Hotel | Entertainment | Commercial Leasinga | Real Estate Operationsb | Corporate, Eliminations and Otherc | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unaffiliated customers | $ | 10,658 | $ | 4,903 | $ | 2,141 | $ | 1,448 | $ | — | $ | 19,150 | |||||||||||
Intersegment | 71 | 51 | 225 | 8 | (355 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation | 7,719 | 3,927 | 1,051 | 1,889 | (203 | ) | 14,383 | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation | 851 | 371 | 766 | 54 | (59 | ) | 1,983 | ||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | — | — | — | — | 4,146 | d | 4,146 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | $ | 2,159 | $ | 656 | $ | 549 | $ | (487 | ) | $ | (4,239 | ) | $ | (1,362 | ) | ||||||||
Capital expenditurese | $ | 174 | $ | 255 | $ | 8,138 | $ | 4,504 | $ | — | $ | 13,071 | |||||||||||
Total assets at June 30, 2016 | 105,167 | 39,405 | 116,554 | 180,039 | 13,093 | 454,258 |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unaffiliated customers | $ | 11,054 | $ | 4,995 | $ | 1,703 | $ | 2,234 | $ | — | $ | 19,986 | |||||||||||
Intersegment | 69 | 79 | 166 | 25 | (339 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation | 8,353 | 3,744 | 985 | 2,011 | (140 | ) | 14,953 | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation | 1,496 | 318 | 501 | 68 | (37 | ) | 2,346 | ||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | — | — | — | — | 2,145 | 2,145 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | $ | 1,274 | $ | 1,012 | $ | 383 | $ | 180 | $ | (2,307 | ) | $ | 542 | ||||||||||
Capital expenditurese | $ | 57 | $ | 8 | $ | 8,399 | $ | 9,140 | $ | — | $ | 17,604 | |||||||||||
Total assets at June 30, 2015 | 109,069 | 49,116 | 47,883 | 203,471 | 4,648 | 414,187 |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unaffiliated customers | $ | 21,233 | $ | 9,046 | $ | 4,194 | $ | 3,703 | $ | — | $ | 38,176 | |||||||||||
Intersegment | 160 | 84 | 361 | 16 | (621 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation | 15,429 | 7,032 | 1,921 | 4,098 | (301 | ) | 28,179 | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation | 1,697 | 706 | 1,242 | 114 | (94 | ) | 3,665 | ||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | — | — | — | — | 7,221 | d | 7,221 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | $ | 4,267 | $ | 1,392 | $ | 1,392 | $ | (493 | ) | $ | (7,447 | ) | $ | (889 | ) | ||||||||
Capital expenditurese | $ | 261 | $ | 279 | $ | 21,895 | $ | 7,629 | $ | — | $ | 30,064 |
10
Hotel | Entertainment | Commercial Leasinga | Real Estate Operationsb | Corporate, Eliminations and Otherc | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unaffiliated customers | $ | 22,673 | $ | 9,304 | $ | 3,524 | $ | 4,710 | $ | — | $ | 40,211 | |||||||||||
Intersegment | 141 | 102 | 252 | 50 | (545 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation | 16,455 | 7,173 | 1,750 | 4,122 | (211 | ) | 29,289 | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation | 2,990 | 642 | 968 | 125 | (75 | ) | 4,650 | ||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | — | — | — | — | 4,121 | 4,121 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | $ | 3,369 | $ | 1,591 | $ | 1,058 | $ | 513 | $ | (4,380 | ) | $ | 2,151 | ||||||||||
Income from discontinued operationsf | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3,218 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3,218 | |||||||||||
Capital expenditurese | 448 | 69 | 16,223 | 15,703 | — | 32,443 |
a. | Includes the results of the Parkside Village and 5700 Slaughter commercial properties through July 2, 2015. |
b. | Includes sales commissions and other revenues together with related expenses. |
c. | Includes consolidated general and administrative expenses and eliminations of intersegment amounts. |
d. | General and administrative costs were higher in the second quarter and first six months of 2016, compared with the second quarter and first six months of 2015, primarily reflecting higher legal and consulting fees mainly due to $1.9 million in second-quarter 2016 and $2.5 million for the first six months of 2016 associated with Stratus' successful proxy contest. |
e. | Also includes purchases and development of residential real estate held for sale. |
f. | Represents a deferred gain, net of taxes, associated with the 2012 sale of 7500 Rialto that was recognized in first-quarter 2015. |
7. | NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS |
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an Accounting Standard Update (ASU) that provides a single comprehensive revenue recognition model, which will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance, and also requires expanded disclosures. The core principle of the model is that revenue is recognized when control of goods or services has been transferred to customers at an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. For public entities, this ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (following the FASB’s August 2015 ASU providing for a one-year deferral of the effective date), and interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim reporting periods within that reporting period. This ASU may be applied either retrospectively to each period presented or prospectively as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. Stratus is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its financial reporting and disclosures, but at this time does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its financial statements.
In April and August 2015, the FASB issued ASUs to simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs. These ASUs require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. Stratus adopted these ASUs on January 1, 2016, and retrospectively adjusted its previously issued financial statements. Upon adoption, Stratus adjusted its December 31, 2015, balance sheet by decreasing other assets and long-term debt by $2.5 million for debt issuance costs related to corresponding debt balances. Stratus elected to continue presenting debt issuance costs for its revolving credit facility as a deferred charge (asset) because of the volatility of its borrowings and repayments under the facility.
In January 2016, the FASB issued an ASU that amends the current guidance on the classification and measurement of financial instruments. This ASU makes limited changes to existing guidance and amends certain disclosure requirements. For public entities, this ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is not permitted, except for the provision on recording fair value changes for financial liabilities under the fair value option. Stratus is currently evaluating the impact this ASU will have on its financial reporting and disclosures, but at this time does not expect the adoption of this ASU will have a material impact on its financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued an ASU that will require lessees to recognize most leases on the balance sheet. This ASU allows lessees to make an accounting policy election to not recognize a lease asset and liability for leases with a term of 12 months or less and that do not have a purchase option that is expected to be exercised. For public entities, this ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early
11
adoption permitted. This ASU must be applied using the modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements. Stratus is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued an ASU that simplifies various aspects of the accounting for share-based payment
transactions, including the income tax consequences, statutory tax withholding requirements, an accounting policy
election for forfeitures and the classification on the statement of cash flows. For public entities, this ASU is effective
for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. Each of the amendments in this ASU provides specific transition requirements. Stratus is currently evaluating the impact this
guidance will have on its financial statements.
8. | SUBSEQUENT EVENTS |
On July 12, 2016, a Stratus subsidiary entered into an $8.0 million stand-alone revolving credit facility with Comerica Bank (the Amarra Drive credit facility). The variable interest rate applicable to amounts borrowed under the Amarra Drive credit facility is LIBOR plus 3.0 percent. The Amarra Drive credit facility matures on July 12, 2019, and is secured by assets at Stratus’ 20-unit Villas at Amarra Drive townhome project (the Amarra Villas), which had a net book value of $6.9 million at June 30, 2016. The Amarra Drive credit facility is guaranteed by Stratus and contains financial covenants including a requirement that Stratus maintain a minimum total stockholders' equity balance of $110.0 million. Principal paydowns will be made as townhomes sell, and additional amounts will be borrowed as additional townhomes are constructed. The remaining principal balance of the loan is due at maturity. The proceeds of the Amarra Drive credit facility will be used for the construction of single family townhomes and related improvements at the Amarra Villas. As of July 31, 2016, Stratus had $0.8 million outstanding under the Amarra Drive credit facility.
On August 2, 2016, the Travis County municipal utility district awarded the sale of $14.6 million in tax bonds. The closing of the sale is scheduled for early September 2016, and Stratus expects to receive $12.3 million of proceeds as reimbursement of infrastructure costs incurred in its development of Barton Creek.
On August 5, 2016, a Stratus subsidiary entered into a $9.9 million construction loan agreement with Southside Bank (the West Killeen Market loan). The variable interest rate is one-month LIBOR plus 2.75 percent, with a minimum interest rate of 3.0 percent. Payments of interest only will be made monthly during the initial 42 months of the 72-month term, followed by 30 months of monthly principal and interest payments based on a 30-year amortization. The West Killeen Market loan is secured by assets at Stratus’ West Killeen Market retail project in Killeen, Texas, which had a net book value of $3.9 million at June 30, 2016, and is guaranteed by Stratus until construction is completed and certain debt service coverage ratios are met. The proceeds of the West Killeen Market loan will be used for the construction of the West Killeen Market project. Stratus will not make an initial draw on the West Killeen Market loan until certain site improvements have been completed.
12
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
OVERVIEW
In Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, “we,” “us,” “our” and "Stratus" refer to Stratus Properties Inc. and all entities owned or controlled by Stratus Properties Inc. You should read the following discussion in conjunction with our financial statements, the related Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the discussion of our business and properties included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (2015 Form 10-K) filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The results of operations reported and summarized below are not necessarily indicative of future operating results, and future results could differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements (refer to "Cautionary Statement" for further discussion). All subsequent references to “Notes” refer to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) located in Part I, Item 1. “Financial Statements” of this Form 10-Q, unless otherwise stated.
We are a diversified real estate company engaged primarily in the acquisition, entitlement, development, management, operation and sale of commercial, hotel, entertainment, and multi- and single-family residential real estate properties, primarily located in the Austin, Texas area, but including projects in certain other select markets in Texas. We generate revenues from sales of developed properties, from our hotel and entertainment operations and from rental income from our commercial properties. See Note 6 for further discussion of our operating segments.
Developed property sales can include an individual tract of land that has been developed and permitted for residential use, a developed lot with a home already built on it or condominium units at the W Austin Hotel & Residences. We may sell properties under development, undeveloped properties or commercial properties, if opportunities arise that we believe will maximize overall asset values as part of our business plan. See "Business Strategy and Related Risks" below.
The number of developed lots/units, acreage under development and undeveloped acreage as of June 30, 2016, that comprise our real estate development operations are presented in the following table.
Acreage | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Under Development | Undeveloped | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed Lots/Units | Multi- family | Commercial | Total | Single family | Multi-family | Commercial | Total | Total Acreage | ||||||||||||||||||
Austin: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Barton Creek | 259 | 38 | — | 38 | 512 | 289 | 398 | 1,199 | 1,237 | |||||||||||||||||
Circle C | 21 | — | — | — | — | 36 | 216 | 252 | 252 | |||||||||||||||||
Lantana | — | — | — | — | — | — | 56 | 56 | 56 | |||||||||||||||||
W Austin Residences | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
The Oaks at Lakeway | — | — | 87 | 87 | — | — | — | — | 87 | |||||||||||||||||
Magnolia | — | — | — | — | — | — | 124 | 124 | 124 | |||||||||||||||||
West Killeen Market | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9 | 9 | 9 | |||||||||||||||||
San Antonio: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Camino Real | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||
Total | 282 | 38 | 87 | 125 | 512 | 325 | 805 | 1,642 | 1,767 |
Our residential holdings at June 30, 2016, are principally in southwest Austin, Texas, and included developed lots at Barton Creek and the Circle C community, and condominium units at the W Austin Hotel & Residences. See "Development Activities - Residential" for further discussion. Our commercial leasing holdings at June 30, 2016, consisted of the office and retail space at the W Austin Hotel & Residences, the first phase of Barton Creek Village, The Oaks at Lakeway and the first phase of the Santal multi-family project. See "Development Activities - Commercial" for further discussion.
The W Austin Hotel & Residences is located on a two-acre city block in downtown Austin and contains a 251-room luxury hotel, 159 residential condominium units (of which the remaining two unsold units were being marketed as of June 30, 2016), and office, retail and entertainment space. The hotel is managed by Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. The entertainment space, occupied by Austin City Limits Live at the Moody Theater (ACL Live), includes a live music and entertainment venue and production studio. Our 3TEN ACL Live venue, which is located
13
on the site of the W Austin Hotel & Residences opened in March 2016. The 3TEN ACL Live venue has a capacity of approximately 350 people and is designed to be more intimate than ACL Live, which can accommodate approximately 3,000 people.
For second-quarter 2016, our revenues totaled $19.2 million and our net loss attributable to common stockholders totaled $2.5 million, compared with revenues of $20.0 million and net loss attributable to common stockholders of $1.1 million for second-quarter 2015. For the first six months of 2016, our revenues totaled $38.2 million and our net loss attributable to common stockholders totaled $4.2 million, compared with revenues of $40.2 million and net income attributable to common stockholders of $1.6 million for the first six months of 2015.
The decrease in revenues in the 2016 periods primarily reflects the sale of lower-priced lots and lower room revenues from the W Austin Hotel, partially offset by increased commercial leasing revenue relating to The Oaks at Lakeway and Santal. The results for the 2016 periods also reflect an increase in general and administrative expenses primarily due to costs of $1.9 million in second-quarter 2016 and $2.5 million for the first six months of 2016 associated with our successful proxy contest, and higher interest expense. Higher interest expense in the 2016 periods reflects increased borrowings and higher interest rates associated with our refinancing of the W Austin Hotel & Residences and increased construction loans to support the development of The Oaks at Lakeway and Santal. In January 2016, we refinanced debt associated with our wholly owned W Austin Hotel & Residences with longer-term, fixed-rate debt, and reported a loss on early extinguishment of debt totaling $0.8 million ($0.5 million to net loss attributable to common stockholders) for the first six months of 2016. The results for the first six months of 2015 included the recognition of a gain associated with the 2012 sale of 7500 Rialto totaling $5.0 million ($3.2 million to net income attributable to common stockholders). Results for the second quarter and first six months of 2015 included reductions of $0.9 million and $1.9 million, respectively, for net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries relating to our former joint venture partner’s interest in the W Austin Hotel & Residences.
For discussion of operating cash flows and debt transactions, including our refinancing of the W Austin Hotel & Residences, see "Capital Resources and Liquidity" below.
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND RELATED RISKS
Our overall strategy has been to enhance the value of our properties by securing and maintaining development entitlements and developing and building real estate projects on these properties for sale or investment. We have also pursued opportunities for new projects that offer the possibility of acceptable returns and risks.
In March 2015, we announced that our board of directors had unanimously approved a five-year plan to create value for stockholders by methodically developing certain existing assets and strategically marketing other assets for sale at appropriate values. Under the plan, any future new projects will be complementary to existing operations and will be projected to be developed and sold within a five-year time frame. Consistent with our five-year plan, on July 2, 2015, we completed the sales of our Austin-area Parkside Village and 5700 Slaughter commercial properties, both located in the Circle C community, for $32.5 million and $12.5 million, respectively. As discussed further below under “Development Activities,” we are in negotiations to sell The Oaks at Lakeway, continue to market our completed single-family homesites, continue planning for the second phase of our Santal multi-family project at Barton Creek Section N, and continue to progress our development projects and plans, including additional HEB-anchored projects.
In April 2016, we announced that our board of directors authorized management to explore a full range of strategic alternatives to enhance value for our stockholders, including, but not limited to, a sale of Stratus, a sale of certain of our core assets, a share repurchase program, and continuing our long-term plans to develop the value of our properties. After conducting a thorough process of evaluating several financial advisors, we have engaged Hentschel & Company, a premier boutique investment banking advisory firm focused on the real estate industry, as financial advisor in connection with the review of strategic alternatives. The board of directors has not set a definitive timeline for completion of this review process and has not determined to pursue any particular strategic alternative or enter into any transaction. There can be no assurance that this process will result in any change to the previously announced five-year plan, a sale transaction or any other transaction.
We believe that the Austin and surrounding sub-markets continue to be desirable. Many of our developments are in locations where development approvals have historically been subject to regulatory constraints, which has made it difficult to obtain entitlements. Our Austin assets, which are located in desirable areas with significant regulatory constraints, are highly entitled and now have utility capacity for full buildout. As a result, we believe that through
14
strategic planning, development and marketing, as provided in our five-year plan, we can maximize and fully realize their value. Our development plans require significant additional capital, and may be pursued through joint ventures or other means. In addition, our strategy is subject to continued review by our board of directors and may change as a result of the outcome of our recently-announced review of strategic alternatives, market conditions or other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.
In years past, economic conditions, including the constrained capital and credit markets, negatively affected the execution of our business plan, primarily by decreasing our pace of development to match economic and market conditions. We responded to these conditions by successfully restructuring our existing debt, including reducing interest rates and extending maturities, which enabled us to preserve our development opportunities until market conditions improved. Economic conditions have improved and we believe we have the financial flexibility to fully exploit our development opportunities and resources in accordance with our five-year plan. During the first six months of 2016, our operating cash flows reflect purchases and development of real estate properties totaling $7.6 million, funded primarily from construction and term loans, to invest in new development opportunities to be executed over the next 24 months. As of June 30, 2016, we had $3.0 million of availability under our revolving line of credit with Comerica Bank, which matures in August 2017.
Although as of June 30, 2016, we have scheduled debt maturities of $12.9 million occurring in fourth-quarter 2016 and $44.6 million in 2017, and significant recurring costs, including property taxes, maintenance and marketing, we believe we will have sufficient sources of debt financing and cash from operations to address our cash requirements. See "Capital Resources and Liquidity" below regarding recent debt repayments and refinancing and “Risk Factors” included in Part 1, Item 1A. of our 2015 Form 10-K for further discussion.
DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES
Residential. As of June 30, 2016, the number of our residential developed lots/units, lots under development and lots for potential development by area are shown below:
Residential Lots/Units | ||||||||||||
Developed | Under Development | Potential Developmenta | Total | |||||||||
Barton Creek: | ||||||||||||
Amarra Drive: | ||||||||||||
Phase II Lots | 13 | — | — | 13 | ||||||||
Phase III Lots | 54 | — | — | 54 | ||||||||
Townhomes | — | 20 | 170 | 190 | ||||||||
Section N Multi-family | ||||||||||||
Santal Multi-family | 192 | 44 | — | 236 | ||||||||
Other Section N | — | — | 1,624 | 1,624 | ||||||||
Other Barton Creek sections | — | — | 156 | 156 | ||||||||
Circle C: | ||||||||||||
Meridian | 21 | — | — | 21 | ||||||||
Tract 101 Multi-family | — | — | 240 | 240 | ||||||||
Tract 102 Multi-family | — | — | 56 | 56 | ||||||||
Flores Street | — | — | 6 | 6 | ||||||||
W Austin Residences: | ||||||||||||
Condominium units | 2 | — | — | 2 | ||||||||
Total Residential Lots/Units | 282 | 64 | 2,252 | 2,598 |
a. | Our development of the properties identified under the heading “Potential Development” is dependent upon the approval of our development plans and permits by governmental agencies, including the City of Austin (the City). Those governmental agencies may not approve one or more development plans and permit applications related to such properties or may require us to modify our development plans. Accordingly, our development strategy with respect to those properties may change in the future. While we may be proceeding with approved infrastructure projects on some of these properties, they are not considered to be “under development” for disclosure in this table unless other development activities necessary to fully realize the properties’ intended final use are in progress or scheduled to commence in the near term. |
Amarra Drive. Amarra Drive Phase I, which was the initial phase of the Amarra Drive subdivision, was completed in 2007 and included six lots with sizes ranging from approximately one to four acres. Amarra Drive Phase II, which
15
consists of 35 lots on 51 acres, was substantially completed in October 2008. During the first six months of 2016, we sold one Phase II lot for $0.6 million and as of June 30, 2016, 13 Phase II lots remained available for sale.
In first-quarter 2015, we substantially completed the development of Amarra Drive Phase III, which consists of 64 lots on 166 acres. As of June 30, 2016, 54 Phase III lots remained available for sale. During July 2016, one Amarra Drive Phase III lot was sold, and as of July 31, 2016, three Phase III lots were under contract.
The Villas at Amarra Drive townhome project is a 20-unit development. We completed site work in late 2015, construction began in March 2016 on the first five townhomes, and as of July 31, 2016, we are marketing the townhomes for sale. These townhomes are scheduled for substantial completion by mid-2017.
Section N. The Santal multi-family project, a garden-style apartment complex, was substantially completed in July 2016 and includes 236 apartment units. We recognized rental revenue, which is included in the Commercial Leasing segment, beginning in January 2016. As of July 31, 2016, 55 units were leased.
Circle C. We are developing the Circle C community based on the entitlements secured in our Circle C settlement with the City. Our Circle C settlement, as amended in 2004, permits development of 1.16 million square feet of commercial space, 504 multi-family units and 830 single-family residential lots. Meridian is an 800-lot residential development at the Circle C community. Development of the final phase of Meridian, which consisted of 57 one-acre lots, was completed in first-quarter 2014. During the first six months of 2016, we sold 10 Meridian lots for $2.8 million and as of June 30, 2016, 21 lots remained available for sale. During July 2016, we sold one additional Meridian lot and as of July 31, 2016, nine lots were under contract.
W Austin Residences. As of June 30, 2016, two condominium units remained available for sale and are being marketed for sale.
Commercial. As of June 30, 2016, the number of square feet of our commercial property developed, under development and our remaining entitlements for potential development (excluding property associated with our unconsolidated joint venture with Tramell Crow Central Texas Development, Inc. relating to Crestview Station in Austin (the Crestview Station Joint Venture)) are shown below:
Commercial Property | |||||||||||
Developed | Under Development | Potential Developmenta | Total | ||||||||
Barton Creek: | |||||||||||
Treaty Oak Bank | 3,085 | — | — | 3,085 | |||||||
Barton Creek Village Phase I | 22,366 | — | — | 22,366 | |||||||
Barton Creek Village Phase II | — | — | 16,000 | 16,000 | |||||||
Entry corner | — | — | 5,000 | 5,000 | |||||||
Amarra retail/office | — | — | 83,081 | 83,081 | |||||||
Section N | — | — | 1,500,000 | 1,500,000 | |||||||
Circle C: | |||||||||||
Tract 110 | — | — | 614,500 | 614,500 | |||||||
Tract 114 | — | — | 78,357 | 78,357 | |||||||
Lantana: | |||||||||||
Tract GR1 | — | — | 325,000 | 325,000 | |||||||
Tract G07 | — | — | 160,000 | 160,000 | |||||||
W Austin Hotel & Residences: | |||||||||||
Office | 38,316 | — | — | 38,316 | |||||||
Retail | 18,327 | — | — | 18,327 | |||||||
The Oaks at Lakeway | 217,736 | 13,700 | — | 231,436 | |||||||
Magnolia | — | — | 351,000 | 351,000 | |||||||
West Killeen Market | — | — | 44,000 | 44,000 | |||||||
Total Square Feet | 299,830 | 13,700 | 3,176,938 | 3,490,468 |
a. | Our development of the properties identified under the heading “Potential Development” is dependent upon the approval of our development plans and permits by governmental agencies, including the City. Those governmental agencies may not approve one or more development plans and permit applications related to such properties or may require us to modify our development plans. Accordingly, our development strategy with respect to those properties may change in the future. While |
16
we may be proceeding with approved infrastructure projects on some of these properties, they are not considered to be “under development” for disclosure in this table unless other development activities necessary to fully realize the properties’ intended final use are in progress or scheduled to commence in the near term.
Barton Creek. The first phase of Barton Creek Village consists of a 22,366-square-foot retail complex and a 3,085-square-foot bank building. As of June 30, 2016, occupancy was 100 percent for the retail complex, and the bank building is leased through January 2023.
Lantana. Lantana is a partially developed, mixed-use real-estate development project. As of June 30, 2016, we had entitlements for approximately 485,000 square feet of office and retail space on the remaining 56 acres. Regional utility and road infrastructure is in place with capacity to serve Lantana at full build-out as permitted under our existing entitlements. We received final approval from the City in August 2015 for a 325,000 square-foot mixed-use development and we expect to move forward with development during 2016.
W Austin Hotel & Residences. The W Austin Hotel & Residences has 38,316 square feet of leasable office space, including 9,000 square feet occupied by our corporate office, and 18,327 square feet of retail space. As of June 30, 2016, both the office and retail space were substantially all occupied.
The Oaks at Lakeway. The Oaks at Lakeway is a HEB Grocery Company, L.P. (HEB) anchored retail project planned for 231,436 square feet of commercial space. As of June 30, 2016, leases for approximately 90 percent of the space, including the HEB lease, have been executed and leasing for the remaining space is under way. The HEB store opened in October 2015, and 16 retail tenants have opened in 2016. Construction of 217,736 square feet was substantially complete as of June 30, 2016, and construction of the remaining space will be started once leases have been executed. We have received attractive bids for the project and are in active negotiations to sell the property.
Magnolia. The Magnolia project is a HEB-anchored retail project planned for 351,000 square feet of commercial space. Planning and infrastructure work by the city of Magnolia and road expansion by the Texas Department of Transportation are in progress and construction is expected to be completed in 2017. The HEB store is expected to open in fourth-quarter 2017.
West Killeen Market. In 2015, we acquired approximately 21 acres in Killeen, Texas, to develop the West Killeen Market project, a HEB-anchored retail project planned for 44,000 square feet of commercial space and three pad sites adjacent to a 90,000 square-foot HEB grocery store. Construction is expected to begin in August 2016, and the HEB store is expected to open in March 2017.
UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATE
Crestview Station. Crestview Station is a single-family, multi-family, retail and office development, located on the site of a commuter rail line. As of June 30, 2016, the Crestview Station Joint Venture has sold all of its properties except for one commercial site (see Note 6 in our 2015 Form 10-K). We account for our 50 percent interest in the Crestview Station Joint Venture under the equity method.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We are continually evaluating the development and sale potential of our properties and will continue to consider opportunities to enter into transactions involving our properties. As a result, and because of numerous other factors affecting our business activities as described herein, our past operating results are not necessarily indicative of our future results.
17
The following table summarizes our results (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss): | |||||||||||||||
Hotel | $ | 2,159 | $ | 1,274 | $ | 4,267 | $ | 3,369 | |||||||
Entertainment | 656 | 1,012 | 1,392 | 1,591 | |||||||||||
Commercial leasing | 549 | 383 | 1,392 | 1,058 | |||||||||||
Real estate operations | (487 | ) | 180 | (493 | ) | 513 | |||||||||
Corporate, eliminations and other | (4,239 | ) | (2,307 | ) | (7,447 | ) | (4,380 | ) | |||||||
Operating (loss) income | $ | (1,362 | ) | $ | 542 | $ | (889 | ) | $ | 2,151 | |||||
Interest expense, net | $ | (2,346 | ) | $ | (1,031 | ) | $ | (4,315 | ) | $ | (1,881 | ) | |||
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3,218 | |||||||
Net (loss) income | $ | (2,483 | ) | $ | (240 | ) | $ | (4,166 | ) | $ | 3,544 | ||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries | $ | — | $ | (879 | ) | $ | — | $ | (1,921 | ) | |||||
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders | $ | (2,483 | ) | $ | (1,119 | ) | $ | (4,166 | ) | $ | 1,623 |
We have four operating segments: Hotel, Entertainment, Commercial Leasing and Real Estate Operations (see Note 6 for further discussion). The following is a discussion of our operating results by segment.
Hotel
The following table summarizes our Hotel operating results (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
Hotel revenue | $ | 10,729 | $ | 11,123 | $ | 21,393 | $ | 22,814 | |||||||
Hotel cost of sales, excluding depreciation | 7,719 | 8,353 | 15,429 | 16,455 | |||||||||||
Depreciation | 851 | 1,496 | 1,697 | 2,990 | |||||||||||
Operating income | $ | 2,159 | $ | 1,274 | $ | 4,267 | $ | 3,369 |
Hotel Operating Income. Operating income for the Hotel segment increased during the 2016 periods, primarily reflecting lower depreciation expense.
Hotel Revenue. Hotel revenue primarily includes revenue from W Austin Hotel room reservations and food and beverage sales. Revenue per available room, which is calculated by dividing total room revenue by the average total rooms available, averaged $285 for second-quarter 2016 and $283 for the first six months of 2016, compared with $287 for second-quarter 2015 and $303 for the first six months of 2015. Lower Hotel revenues in the 2016 periods primarily reflect lower room rates and lower food and beverage sales, partly attributable to increased hotel capacity in the Austin area.
Hotel Cost of Sales. Hotel operating costs (excluding depreciation) totaled $7.7 million in second-quarter 2016 and $15.4 million for for the first six months of 2016, compared with $8.4 million in second-quarter 2015 and $16.5 million for the first six months of 2015. Lower costs in the 2016 periods primarily reflect lower management fees and decreased food and beverage costs.
Hotel Depreciation. Hotel depreciation totaled $0.9 million in second-quarter 2016 and $1.7 million for the first six months of 2016, compared with $1.5 million in second-quarter 2015 and $3.0 million for the first six months of 2015. Lower depreciation expense in the 2016 periods primarily reflects certain furniture and equipment being fully depreciated as of December 31, 2015.
18
Entertainment
The following table summarizes our Entertainment operating results (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
Entertainment revenue | $ | 4,954 | $ | 5,074 | $ | 9,130 | $ | 9,406 | |||||||
Entertainment cost of sales, excluding depreciation | 3,927 | 3,744 | 7,032 | 7,173 | |||||||||||
Depreciation | 371 | 318 | 706 | 642 | |||||||||||
Operating income | $ | 656 | $ | 1,012 | $ | 1,392 | $ | 1,591 |
Entertainment Operating Income. Operating income for the Entertainment segment decreased in the 2016 periods, primarily as a result of lower revenues and, in the second quarter of 2016, higher cost of sales.
Certain key operating statistics specific to the concert and event hosting industry are included below to provide additional information regarding our ACL Live operating performance.
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
Events: | |||||||||||||||
Events hosted | 59 | 55 | 110 | 103 | |||||||||||
Estimated attendance | 58,700 | 63,400 | 113,100 | 119,200 | |||||||||||
Ancillary net revenue per attendee | $ | 46.06 | $ | 48.67 | $ | 51.09 | $ | 48.83 | |||||||
Ticketing: | |||||||||||||||
Number of tickets sold | 42,400 | 43,900 | 76,000 | 77,700 | |||||||||||
Gross value of tickets sold (in thousands) | $ | 2,670 | $ | 3,009 | $ | 4,000 | $ | 4,790 |
Entertainment Revenue. Entertainment revenue primarily reflects the results of operations for ACL Live, including ticket sales, revenue from private events, sponsorships, personal seat license sales and suite sales, and sales of concessions and merchandise. Entertainment revenue also reflects revenues associated with events hosted at venues other than ACL Live, including 3TEN ACL Live, and production of recorded content for artists performing at ACL Live or 3TEN ACL Live, as well as the results of the Stageside Productions joint venture with Pedernales Entertainment LLC. Revenues from the Entertainment segment will vary from period to period as a result of factors such as the price of tickets and number of tickets sold, as well as the number and type of events. The decrease in entertainment revenue in the 2016 periods primarily reflects lower event attendance and lower ticket sales.
Entertainment Cost of Sales. Entertainment operating costs (excluding depreciation) totaled $3.9 million in second-quarter 2016 and $7.0 million for the first six months of 2016, compared with $3.7 million in second-quarter 2015 and $7.2 million for the first six months of 2015. Costs from the Entertainment segment will vary from period to period as a result of the number and types of events hosted.
Commercial Leasing
The following table summarizes our Commercial Leasing operating results (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
Rental revenue | $ | 2,366 | $ | 1,869 | $ | 4,555 | $ | 3,776 | |||||||
Rental cost of sales, excluding depreciation | 1,051 | 985 | 1,921 | 1,750 | |||||||||||
Depreciation | 766 | 501 | 1,242 | 968 | |||||||||||
Operating income | $ | 549 | $ | 383 | $ | 1,392 | $ | 1,058 |
Commercial Leasing Operating Income. Operating income from the Commercial Leasing segment increased in the 2016 periods, primarily as a result of rental revenue from The Oaks at Lakeway and Santal, which opened in 2016, partly offset by a decrease in revenue from Parkside Village and 5700 Slaughter, which were sold in July 2015.
Rental Revenue. Rental revenue for 2016 primarily includes revenue from The Oaks at Lakeway, office and retail space at the W Austin Hotel & Residences, Barton Creek Village and the Santal multi-family project. Rental revenue
19
for the 2015 periods included revenue from Parkside Village and 5700 Slaughter, which were both sold on July 2, 2015. The increase in rental revenue in the 2016 periods reflects rental revenues from The Oaks at Lakeway and the Santal multi-family project, partially offset by a decrease related to the sales of Parkside Village and 5700 Slaughter.
Rental Cost of Sales. Rental operating costs totaled $1.1 million in second-quarter 2016 and $1.9 million for the first six months of 2016, compared with $1.0 million in second-quarter 2015 and $1.8 million for the first six months of 2015. The increase in rental costs in the 2016 periods primarily reflects increased operating costs relating to The Oaks at Lakeway and Santal, partially offset by a decrease in operating expenses related to the sales of Parkside Village and 5700 Slaughter.
Real Estate Operations
The following table summarizes our Real Estate Operations operating results (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||||
Developed property sales | $ | 1,300 | $ | 2,045 | $ | 3,365 | $ | 4,250 | |||||||
Undeveloped property sales | 73 | — | 73 | — | |||||||||||
Commissions and other | 83 | 214 | 281 | 510 | |||||||||||
Total revenues | 1,456 | 2,259 | 3,719 | 4,760 | |||||||||||
Cost of sales, including depreciation | 1,943 | 2,079 | 4,212 | 4,247 | |||||||||||
Operating (loss) income | $ | (487 | ) | $ | 180 | $ | (493 | ) | $ | 513 | |||||
Real Estate Operations Operating (Loss) Income. The Real Estate Operations segment reported operating losses in the 2016 periods, primarily reflecting lower revenues from developed property sales.
Developed Property Sales. The following tables summarize our developed property sales (dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Lots | Revenues | Average Cost Per Lot | Lots | Revenues | Average Cost Per Lot | ||||||||||||||||
Barton Creek | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amarra Drive: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Phase III Lots | — | $ | — | $ | — | 3 | $ | 1,770 | $ | 284 | |||||||||||
Circle C | |||||||||||||||||||||
Meridian | 5 | 1,300 | 147 | 1 | 275 | 156 | |||||||||||||||
Total Residential | 5 | $ | 1,300 | 4 | $ | 2,045 |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Lots | Revenues | Average Cost Per Lot | Lots | Revenues | Average Cost Per Lot | ||||||||||||||||
Barton Creek | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amarra Drive: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Phase II Lots | 1 | $ | 550 | $ | 190 | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||
Phase III Lots | — | — | — | 3 | 1,770 | 284 | |||||||||||||||
Circle C | |||||||||||||||||||||
Meridian | 10 | 2,815 | 159 | 9 | 2,480 | 156 | |||||||||||||||
Total Residential | 11 | $ | 3,365 | 12 | $ | 4,250 | |||||||||||||||
The decrease in developed property sales revenues in the 2016 periods primarily resulted from a decrease in Amarra Drive Phase III lot sales, partly offset by an increase in lot sales at Meridian.
20
Commissions and Other. Commissions and other totaled $0.1 million for second-quarter 2016 and $0.3 million for the first six months of 2016, compared with $0.2 million for second-quarter 2015 and $0.5 million for the first six months of 2015.
Cost of Sales. Cost of sales includes cost of property sold, project operating and marketing expenses and allocated overhead costs. Cost of sales for the 2015 periods were partly offset by Barton Creek municipal utility district (MUD) reimbursements totaling less than $0.1 million. Cost of sales totaled $1.9 million for second-quarter 2016 and $4.2 million for the first six months of 2016, compared with $2.1 million for second-quarter 2015 and $4.2 million for the first six months of 2015.
Corporate, Eliminations and Other
Corporate, eliminations and other includes consolidated general and administrative expenses, which primarily consist of employee salaries, wages and other costs and totaled $4.1 million in second-quarter 2016 and $7.2 million for the first six months of 2016, compared with $2.1 million in second-quarter 2015 and $4.1 million for the first six months of 2015. Beginning January 1, 2016, general and administrative expenses are managed on a consolidated basis and are not allocated to our operating segments. The segment disclosures for the second quarter and first six months of 2015 have been recast to be consistent with the second quarter and first six months of 2016. Costs were higher for the 2016 periods, primarily reflecting higher legal and consulting fees mainly due to $1.9 million in second-quarter 2016 and $2.5 million for the first six months of 2016 associated with Stratus' successful proxy contest. Corporate, eliminations and other also includes eliminations of intersegment amounts incurred by the four operating segments.
Non-Operating Results
Interest Expense, Net. Interest expense (before capitalized interest) totaled $3.9 million for second-quarter 2016 and $7.6 million for the first six months of 2016, compared with $2.3 million for second-quarter 2015 and $4.6 million for the first six months of 2015. The increase in interest expense in the 2016 periods primarily reflects higher loan balances and interest rates primarily reflecting our refinancing of the W Austin Hotel & Residences, and increased construction loans to support development of The Oaks at Lakeway and the Santal multi-family project.
Capitalized interest totaled $1.6 million for second-quarter 2016 and $3.3 million for the first six months of 2016, compared with $1.3 million for second-quarter 2015 and $2.7 million for the first six months of 2015 and is primarily related to development activities at Barton Creek and at The Oaks at Lakeway.
Loss on Interest Rate Derivative Instruments. We recorded losses of $0.1 million for second-quarter 2016 and $0.5 million for the first six months of 2016, compared with a loss of less than $0.1 million in second-quarter 2015 and $0.1 million for the first six months of 2015, associated with changes in the fair value of our interest rate cap agreement.
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt. We recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $0.8 million for the first six months of 2016 associated with the full repayment of our existing obligations under the Bank of America loan with the proceeds from the Goldman Sachs loan.
Other Income, Net. We recorded other income of less than $0.1 million for the second quarter and first six months of 2016, compared with $0.3 million for the second quarter and first six months of 2015. Other income for the 2015 periods included interest received in connection with Barton Creek MUD reimbursements.
Equity in Unconsolidated Affiliates' (Loss) Income. We account for our interests in our unconsolidated affiliates using the equity method. Our equity in the net (loss) income of these entities totaled less than $(0.1) million for second-quarter 2016 and $0.1 million for the first six months of 2016, compared with $(0.2) million for second-quarter 2015 and $(0.1) million for the first six months of 2015.
Benefit from (Provision for) Income Taxes. We recorded a tax benefit from (provision for) income taxes of $1.3 million for second-quarter 2016 and $2.3 million for the first six months of 2016, compared with $0.2 million for second-quarter 2015 and less than ($0.1) million for the first six months of 2015. Both the 2016 and 2015 periods also include the Texas state margin tax. The difference between Stratus' consolidated effective income tax rate and the U.S. Federal statutory income tax rate of 35 percent is primarily attributable to the state margin tax. The state margin tax in the 2015 periods was partially offset by the tax effect of income attributable to noncontrolling interests.
21
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests in Subsidiaries. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries totaled $0.9 million for second-quarter 2015 and $1.9 million for the first six months of 2015. Stratus did not have net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries in the 2016 periods, primarily because of Stratus' purchase of Canyon-Johnson’s approximate 58 percent interest in the Block 21 Joint Venture (which owns the W Austin Hotel & Residences) in September 2015, resulting in Stratus owning 100 percent of the entity.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
In 2012, we sold 7500 Rialto, an office building in Lantana. In connection with the sale, we recognized a gain of $5.1 million and deferred a gain of $5.0 million because of a guaranty provided to the lender in connection with the buyer's assumption of the loan related to 7500 Rialto. The guaranty was released in January 2015, and we recognized the deferred gain totaling $5.0 million ($3.2 million to net income attributable to common stockholders) in first-quarter 2015.
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Volatility in the real estate market, including the markets in which we operate, can impact sales of our properties from period to period. However, we believe that the unique nature and location of our assets will provide us positive cash flows over time. See "Business Strategy and Related Risks" for further discussion of our liquidity.
Comparison of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015
Operating Activities. Cash used in operating activities totaled $10.3 million during the first six months of 2016, compared with $0.6 million during the first six months of 2015. The decrease in the 2016 period, compared to the 2015 period, is primarily a result of the net loss attributable to common stockholders, an increase in deferred charges associated with leases at The Oaks at Lakeway and restricted cash related to reserves for debt service, taxes, and insurance for the Goldman Sachs loan, partially offset by lower purchases and development of real estate. The first six months of 2015 also included MUD reimbursements of $5.3 million. Expenditures for purchases and development of real estate properties totaled $7.6 million during the first six months of 2016 and $15.7 million during the first six months of 2015, and primarily included development costs for our Barton Creek properties.
Investing Activities. Cash used in investing activities totaled $22.5 million during the first six months of 2016, compared with $16.7 million during the first six months of 2015. Development of commercial leasing properties increased during the first six months of 2016 to $21.9 million, compared with $16.2 million during the first six months of 2015, primarily relating to the Santal multi-family and The Oaks at Lakeway projects.
Financing Activities. Cash provided by financing activities totaled $26.2 million during the first six months of 2016, compared with $13.1 million during the first six months of 2015. During the first six months of 2016, net borrowings on the Comerica credit facility totaled $8.9 million, compared with $8.1 million for the first six months of 2015. Net borrowings on other project and term loans totaled $18.5 million for the first six months of 2016, compared with $6.1 million for the first six months of 2015. The increase in borrowings for the first six months of 2016 primarily reflects borrowings to fund the development of the Santal multi-family and The Oaks at Lakeway projects (see Note 4) and the refinancing of the W Austin Hotel & Residences. We also incurred $1.0 million in financing costs for the first six months of 2016 primarily related to our new Goldman Sachs loan. See also “Credit Facility and Other Financing Arrangements” for a discussion of our outstanding debt at June 30, 2016.
Credit Facility and Other Financing Arrangements
At June 30, 2016, we had total debt based on the principal amounts outstanding of $290.5 million, compared with $263.1 million at December 31, 2015. The principal amount of our debt at June 30, 2016, consisted of the following:
• | $149.2 million under the Goldman Sachs loan, the proceeds of which were used to refinance the W Austin Hotel & Residences in January 2016. |
• | $53.1 million under the construction loan agreement to fund the construction, development and leasing of The Oaks at Lakeway in Lakeway, Texas (the Lakeway construction loan). |
• | $42.0 million under the $52.5 million Comerica credit facility, which is comprised of a $45.0 million revolving line of credit, $3.0 million of which was available at June 30, 2016, and a $7.5 million letters of credit tranche, against which $2.3 million was committed and $5.2 million was available at June 30, 2016. The |
22
Comerica credit facility is secured by substantially all of our assets except for properties that are encumbered by separate loan financing.
• | $28.6 million under the construction loan agreement to fund the development and construction of the first phase of a multi-family development in Section N of Barton Creek (the Santal construction loan). |
• | $8.0 million under an unsecured term loan with Diversified Real Asset Income Fund (DRAIF), formerly American Strategic Income Portfolio or ASIP. |
• | $5.7 million under the term loan agreement with PlainsCapital Bank secured by assets at Barton Creek Village (the Barton Creek Village term loan). |
• | $3.8 million under the term loan agreement with Holliday Fenoglio Fowler, L.P., the proceeds of which were used to purchase approximately 142 acres of land in Magnolia, Texas (the Magnolia loan). |
See Note 8 for discussion of additional indebtedness incurred subsequent to June 30, 2016.
The Comerica credit facility and our DRAIF unsecured term loan include a requirement that we maintain a minimum total stockholders’ equity balance of $110.0 million. As of June 30, 2016, Stratus' total stockholders' equity was $132.6 million. See Note 7 in our 2015 Form 10-K and Notes 4 and 8 of this Form 10-Q for further discussion of our outstanding debt.
The following table summarizes our debt maturities based on the principal amounts outstanding as of June 30, 2016 (in thousands):
2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Thereafter | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Goldman Sachs loan | $ | 1,069 | $ | 2,096 | $ | 2,215 | $ | 2,342 | $ | 2,477 | $ | 139,049 | $ | 149,248 | |||||||||||||
Lakeway construction loan | — | 315 | 1,284 | 51,537 | — | 53,136 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Comerica credit facility | — | 42,010 | — | — | — | — | 42,010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Santal construction loan | — | — | 28,642 | — | — | — | 28,642 | ||||||||||||||||||||
DRAIF term loan | 8,000 | a | — | — | — | — | — | 8,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Barton Creek Village term loan | 74 | 153 | 160 | 167 | 173 | 4,992 | 5,719 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Magnolia loan | 3,750 | b | — | — | — | — | — | 3,750 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 12,893 | $ | 44,574 | $ | 32,301 | $ | 54,046 | $ | 2,650 | $ | 144,041 | $ | 290,505 |
a. | Matures December 31, 2016. |
b. | Matures October 1, 2016. |
We expect to repay or refinance our near-term debt maturities in the normal course of business and believe we have the ability to do so.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
There have been no material changes in our contractual obligations since December 31, 2015, other than our debt obligations described above. Refer to Part II, Items 7. and 7A. in our 2015 Form 10-K, for further information regarding our contractual obligations.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Refer to Note 7 for discussion of recently issued accounting standards and their impact on our future financial statements and disclosures.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
There have been no material changes in our off-balance sheet arrangements since December 31, 2015. See Note 10 in our 2015 Form 10-K for further information.
23
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements in which we discuss factors we believe may affect our future performance. Forward-looking statements are all statements other than statements of historical facts, such as statements regarding the implementation and potential results of our five-year plan, projections or expectations related to operational and financial performance or liquidity, reimbursements for infrastructure costs, financing and regulatory matters, development plans and sales of properties, commercial leasing activities, timeframes for development, construction and completion of our projects, capital expenditures, liquidity and capital resources, and other plans and objectives of management for future operations and activities. The words “anticipates,” “may,” “can,” “plans,” “believes,” “potential,” “estimates,” “expects,” “projects,” “intends,” “likely,” “will,” “should,” “to be” and any similar expressions and/or statements that are not historical facts are intended to identify those assertions as forward-looking statements.
We caution readers that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results may differ materially from those anticipated, projected or assumed in the forward-looking statements. Important factors that can cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the outcome of the strategic review process, our ability to refinance and service our debt and the availability of financing for development projects and other corporate purposes, our ability to sell properties at prices our board of directors considers acceptable, a decrease in the demand for real estate in the Austin, Texas market, changes in economic and business conditions, reductions in discretionary spending by consumers and corporations, competition from other real estate developers, hotel operators and/or entertainment venue operators and promoters, business opportunities that may be presented to and/or pursued by us, the failure of third parties to satisfy debt service obligations, the failure to complete agreements with strategic partners and/or appropriately manage relationships with strategic partners, the termination of sales contracts or letters of intent due to, among other factors, the failure of one or more closing conditions or market changes, the failure to attract customers for our developments or such customers' failure to satisfy their purchase commitments, increases in interest rates, declines in the market value of our assets, increases in operating costs, including real estate taxes and the cost of construction materials, changes in external perception of the W Austin Hotel, changes in consumer preferences, changes in laws, regulations or the regulatory environment affecting the development of real estate, opposition from special interest groups with respect to development projects, weather-related risks and other factors described in more detail under the heading “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A. in our 2015 Form 10-K filed with the SEC, as updated by our subsequent filings with the SEC.
Investors are cautioned that many of the assumptions upon which our forward-looking statements are based are likely to change after the forward-looking statements are made. Further, we may make changes to our business plans that could affect our results. We caution investors that we do not intend to update our forward-looking statements notwithstanding any changes in our assumptions, business plans, actual experience, or other changes, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
In January 2016 we fully repaid our existing obligations under the BoA loan. See Note 4 for additional information.
At June 30, 2016, $123.8 million face value of our total outstanding debt of $290.5 million bears interest at variable rates. An increase of 100 basis points in annual interest rates for this variable-rate debt would increase our annual interest costs by $1.2 million.
There have been no material changes in our market risks since December 31, 2015. For additional information on our market risks, refer to “Disclosures About Market Risks” included in Part II, Items 7. and 7A. of our 2015 Form 10-K.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, with the participation of management, have evaluated the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on this evaluation, they have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
24
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2016, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
The following table sets forth information with respect to shares of our common stock that we repurchased under the board-approved open market share purchase program during the three months ended June 30, 2016.
(a) Total | (c) Total Number of | (d) Maximum Number | |||||||||||
Number | (b) Average | Shares Purchased as Part | of Shares That May | ||||||||||
of Shares | Price Paid | of Publicly Announced | Yet Be Purchased Under | ||||||||||
Period | Purchased | Per Share | Plans or Programsa | the Plans or Programsa | |||||||||
April 1 to 30, 2016 | — | $ | — | — | 991,695 | ||||||||
May 1 to 31, 2016 | — | — | — | 991,695 | |||||||||
June 1 to 30, 2016 | — | — | — | 991,695 | |||||||||
Total | — | — | — |
a. | In November 2013, the board of directors approved an increase in our open-market share purchase program, initially authorized in 2001, for up to 1.7 million shares of our common stock. The program does not have an expiration date. |
Stratus' loan agreements with Comerica Bank and Diversified Real Asset Income Fund require lender approval of any common stock repurchases.
Item 6. Exhibits.
The exhibits to this report are listed in the Exhibit Index beginning on page E-1 hereof.
25
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
STRATUS PROPERTIES INC.
By: /s/ Erin D. Pickens
----------------------------------------
Erin D. Pickens
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(authorized signatory and
Principal Financial Officer)
Date: August 9, 2016
S-1
STRATUS PROPERTIES INC.
EXHIBIT INDEX
Incorporated by Reference | ||||||||||
Exhibit Number | Exhibit Title | Filed with this Form 10-Q | Form | File No. | Date Filed | |||||
3.1 | Composite Certificate of Incorporation of Stratus Properties Inc. | 8-A/A | 000-19989 | 8/26/2010 | ||||||
3.2 | Amended and Restated By-Laws of Stratus Properties Inc., as amended effective March 9, 2016. | 10-K | 001-37716 | 3/15/2016 | ||||||
4.1 | Second Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated as of March 9, 2016 between Stratus Properties Inc. and Computershare Inc. as Rights Agent. | 8-K | 000-19989 | 3/10/2016 | ||||||
4.2 | Investor Rights Agreement by and between Stratus Properties Inc. and Moffett Holdings, LLC dated as of March 15, 2012. | 8-K | 000-19989 | 3/20/2012 | ||||||
4.3 | Assignment and Assumption Agreement by and among Moffett Holdings, LLC, LCHM Holdings, LLC and Stratus Properties Inc., dated as of March 3, 2014. | 13D | 000-19989 | 3/5/2014 | ||||||
Fifth Amendment to Construction Loan Agreement among Stratus Lakeway Center L.L.C, as Borrower, PlainsCapital Bank, as Administrative Agent and the Other Financial Institutions party thereto, as Lenders dated as of October 29, 2015. | X | |||||||||
10.2* | Severance and Change of Control Agreement between Stratus Properties Inc. and William H. Armstrong III, effective as of April 1, 2016. | 10-Q | 001-37716 | 5/10/2016 | ||||||
10.3* | Severance and Change of Control Agreement between Stratus Properties Inc. and Erin D. Pickens, effective as of April 1, 2016. | 10-Q | 001-37716 | 5/10/2016 | ||||||
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a). | X | |||||||||
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a). | X | |||||||||
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. | X | |||||||||
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. | X | |||||||||
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document. | X | ||||||||
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema. | X | ||||||||
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase. | X | ||||||||
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase. | X | ||||||||
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase. | X | ||||||||
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase. | X | ||||||||
* Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
E-1