STURM RUGER & CO INC - Quarter Report: 2009 October (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
__________
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For the
quarterly period ended October 3,
2009
OR
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For the
transition period
from_______________ to _______________
Commission
file number 1-10435
STURM,
RUGER & COMPANY, INC.
|
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its
charter)
|
Delaware
|
06-0633559
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
employer
|
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
identification
no.)
|
|
Lacey
Place, Southport, Connecticut
|
06890
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
code)
|
(203)
259-7843
|
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area
code)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such requirements for the
past 90 days. Yes x
No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting
company o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
The
number of shares outstanding of the issuer's common stock as of October 3, 2009:
Common Stock, $1 par value –19,072,790.
Page 1 of
31
INDEX
|
STURM,
RUGER & COMPANY, INC.
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
Condensed
balance sheets – October 3, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
3
|
|
Condensed
statements of operations – Three and nine months ended October 3, 2009
and
September 27, 2008
|
5
|
|
Condensed
statement of stockholders’ equity – Nine months ended October 3,
2009
|
6
|
|
Condensed
statements of cash flows –Nine months ended
October 3, 2009 and September
27, 2008
|
7
|
|
Notes
to condensed financial statements – October 3, 2009
|
8
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
|
16
|
|
||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
27
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
28
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | ||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
28
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
29
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
29
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
29
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
29
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
29
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
30
|
SIGNATURES
|
31
|
2
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
STURM,
RUGER & COMPANY, INC.
CONDENSED
BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars
in thousands, except share data)
October
3, 2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
|||||||
(Note)
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Current
Assets
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 5,881 | $ | 9,688 | ||||
Short-term
investments
|
47,237 | 18,558 | ||||||
Trade
receivables, net
|
26,744 | 25,809 | ||||||
Gross
inventories
|
50,903 | 59,846 | ||||||
Less
LIFO reserve
|
(41,310 | ) | (44,338 | ) | ||||
Less
excess and obsolescence reserve
|
(2,545 | ) | (3,569 | ) | ||||
Net
inventories
|
7,048 | 11,939 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
5,343 | 6,400 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
2,646 | 3,374 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
94,899 | 75,768 | ||||||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
133,559 | 125,026 | ||||||
Less
allowances for depreciation
|
(102,031 | ) | (98,807 | ) | ||||
Net
property, plant and equipment
|
31,528 | 26,219 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
9,667 | 7,743 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
3,853 | 3,030 | ||||||
Total
Assets
|
$ | 139,947 | $ | 112,760 |
Note:
|
The
balance sheet at December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited financial
statements at that date but does not include all the information and footnotes
required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America for complete financial statements.
See
notes to condensed financial statements.
3
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
STURM,
RUGER & COMPANY, INC.
CONDENSED
BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars
in thousands, except share data)
October
3, 2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
|||||||
(Note)
|
||||||||
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Equity
|
||||||||
Current
Liabilities
|
||||||||
Trade
accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
$ | 11,526 | $ | 10,235 | ||||
Product
liability
|
1,253 | 1,051 | ||||||
Employee
compensation and benefits
|
12,604 | 7,994 | ||||||
Workers’
compensation
|
4,600 | 5,067 | ||||||
Income
taxes payable
|
3,942 | 4,171 | ||||||
Line
of credit
|
- | 1,000 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
33,925 | 29,518 | ||||||
Accrued
pension liability
|
16,933 | 16,946 | ||||||
Product
liability accrual
|
974 | 693 | ||||||
Contingent
liabilities – Note 9
|
-- | -- | ||||||
Stockholders’
Equity
|
||||||||
Common
Stock, non-voting, par value $1:
|
||||||||
Authorized
shares 50,000; none issued
|
-- | -- | ||||||
Common
Stock, par value $1:
|
||||||||
Authorized
shares – 40,000,000
2009
– 22,798,732 issued,
19,072,790
outstanding
2008
– 22,798,732 issued,
19,047,323
outstanding
|
22,827 | 22,799 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
7,330 | 2,442 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
111,110 | 93,500 | ||||||
Less:
Treasury stock – at cost
2009
– 3,753,821 shares
2008
– 3,751,419 shares
|
(30,167 | ) | (30,153 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(22,985 | ) | (22,985 | ) | ||||
Total
Stockholders’ Equity
|
88,115 | 65,603 | ||||||
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
$ | 139,947 | $ | 112,760 |
Note:
|
The
balance sheet at December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited financial
statements at that date but does not include all the information and footnotes
required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America for complete financial statements.
See
notes to condensed financial statements.
4
STURM,
RUGER & COMPANY, INC.
CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
|
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share
data)
|
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
October
3,
2009
|
September
27,
2008
|
October
3,
2009
|
September
27,
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Net
firearms sales
|
$ | 70,011 | $ | 40,318 | $ | 203,611 | $ | 117,186 | ||||||||
Net
castings sales
|
1,175 | 1,504 | 3,495 | 5,806 | ||||||||||||
Total
net sales
|
71,186 | 41,822 | 207,106 | 122,992 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Cost
of products sold
|
49,404 | 34,964 | 140,766 | 96,985 | ||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
21,782 | 6,858 | 66,340 | 26,007 | ||||||||||||
Expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
Selling
|
5,145 | 3,864 | 15,909 | 12,350 | ||||||||||||
General
and administrative
|
4,556 | 2,615 | 14,940 | 9,524 | ||||||||||||
Other
operating expenses, net
|
750 | - | 750 | - | ||||||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
10,451 | 6,479 | 31,599 | 21,874 | ||||||||||||
Operating
income
|
11,331 | 379 | 34,741 | 4,133 | ||||||||||||
Other
income:
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
income (expense)
|
8 | 72 | (12 | ) | 352 | |||||||||||
Other
income, net
|
125 | 150 | 101 | 204 | ||||||||||||
Total
other income, net
|
133 | 222 | 89 | 556 | ||||||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
11,464 | 601 | 34,830 | 4,689 | ||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
4,356 | 229 | 13,235 | 1,782 | ||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 7,108 | $ | 372 | $ | 21,595 | $ | 2,907 | ||||||||
Earnings
per share
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 0.37 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 1.13 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||||
Diluted
|
$ | 0.37 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 1.12 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||||
Average
shares outstanding
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
19,070 | 20,047 | 19,058 | 20,398 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
|
19,377 | 20,054 | 19,208 | 20,429 |
See
notes to condensed financial
statements.
|
5
STURM,
RUGER & COMPANY, INC.
|
CONDENSED
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
Retained
Earnings
|
Treasury
Stock
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
$ | 22,799 | $ | 2,442 | $ | 93,500 | $ | (30,153 | ) | $ | (22,985 | ) | $ | 65,603 | ||||||||||
Net
income and comprehensive income
|
- | - | 21,595 | - | - | 21,595 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
paid
|
- | - | (3,985 | ) | - | - | (3,985 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
- | 3,505 | - | - | - | 3,505 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax
benefit from exercise of stock options
|
- | 1,411 | - | - | - | 1,411 | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of 27,869 shares of common stock
|
28 | (28 | ) | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
Repurchase
of 2,401 shares of common stock
|
- | - | - | (14 | ) | - | (14 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance
at October 3, 2009
|
$ | 22,827 | $ | 7,330 | $ | 111,110 | $ | (30,167 | ) | $ | (22,985 | ) | $ | 88,115 |
See
notes to condensed financial statements.
6
STURM,
RUGER & COMPANY, INC.
|
CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||
October
3, 2009
|
September
27, 2008
|
|||||||
Operating
Activities
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 21,595 | $ | 2,907 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
|
4,987 | 3,518 | ||||||
Slow
moving inventory valuation adjustment
|
(256 | ) | 280 | |||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
3,505 | 419 | ||||||
Gain
on sale of assets
|
(39 | ) | (95 | ) | ||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(868 | ) | 133 | |||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Trade
receivables
|
(935 | ) | (3,868 | ) | ||||
Inventories
|
5,147 | (3,813 | ) | |||||
Trade
accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
5,433 | 3,054 | ||||||
Product
liability
|
483 | (263 | ) | |||||
Prepaid
expenses, other assets and other liabilities
|
(106 | ) | (2,963 | ) | ||||
Income
taxes
|
(229 | ) | 1,333 | |||||
Cash
provided by operating activities
|
38,717 | 642 | ||||||
Investing
Activities
|
||||||||
Property,
plant and equipment additions
|
(10,301 | ) | (6,380 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale of assets
|
44 | 95 | ||||||
Purchases
of short-term investments
|
(78,217 | ) | (21,931 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from maturities of short-term investments
|
49,538 | 32,400 | ||||||
Cash
provided by (used for) investing activities
|
(38,936 | ) | 4,184 | |||||
Financing
Activities
|
||||||||
Tax
benefit from exercise of stock options
|
1,411 | - | ||||||
Repayment
of line of credit balance
|
(1,000 | ) | - | |||||
Repurchase
of common stock
|
(14 | ) | (7,352 | ) | ||||
Dividends
paid
|
(3,985 | ) | - | |||||
Cash
used for financing activities
|
(3,588 | ) | (7,352 | ) | ||||
Decrease
in cash and cash equivalents
|
(3,807 | ) | (2,526 | ) | ||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
9,688 | 5,106 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 5,881 | $ | 2,580 |
See
notes to condensed financial
statements.
|
7
STURM,
RUGER & COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 -
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The
accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article
10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information
and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America for complete financial statements.
In the
opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements
include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, considered
necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim
periods. Operating results for the nine months ended October 3, 2009
are not indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ending
December 31, 2009. These financial statements have been prepared on a
basis that is substantially consistent with the accounting principles applied in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008.
NOTE 2 -
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization:
Sturm,
Ruger & Company, Inc. (the “Company”) is principally engaged in the design,
manufacture, and sale of firearms to domestic
customers. Approximately 98% of the Company’s total sales for the
three and nine months ended October 3, 2009 were firearms sales, and 2% were
investment castings sales. Export sales represent less than 4% of
total sales. The Company’s design and manufacturing operations are
located in the United States and almost all product content is
domestic. The Company’s firearms are sold through a select number of
independent wholesale distributors principally to the commercial sporting
market.
The
Company manufactures investment castings made from steel alloys for internal use
in its firearms and utilizes available investment casting capacity to
manufacture and sell castings to unaffiliated, third-party
customers.
Fair Value of Financial
Instruments:
The
carrying amounts of financial instruments, including cash, short-term
investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities
approximates fair value due to the short-term maturity of these
items.
Use of
Estimates:
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying
notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications:
Certain
prior period balances have been reclassified to conform with current year
presentation.
8
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements:
|
In June
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued ASC 105-10
(formerly SFAS 168), “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” ASC 105-10
will become the authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by
nongovernment entities. It also modifies the GAAP hierarchy to include only two
levels of GAAP; authoritative and non-authoritative. ASC 105-10 is effective for
financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after
September 15, 2009. Therefore, the Company adopted ASC 105-10 for reporting in
our 2009 third quarter. The adoption did not have a significant impact on the
Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In July
2009, the FASB issued ASC 855-10 (formally SFAS No. 165) “Subsequent Events,”
which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events
that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are
issued or are available to be issued. The pronouncement requires the
disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events
and the basis for that date, that is, whether that date represents the date the
financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. This disclosure
should alert all users of financial statements that an entity has not evaluated
subsequent events after that date in the set of financial statements being
presented. The Company adopted FAS 165 during the quarter ended July
4, 2009.
NOTE 3 –
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS
Short-term
investments consist principally of United States Treasury instruments, all
maturing within one year, and are recorded at cost plus accrued interest, which
approximates market. The income from short-term investments is included in other
income, net. The Company intends to hold these investments until
maturity.
The
Company evaluates securities for other than temporary impairment at least on a
quarterly basis, and more frequently when market conditions warrant such
evaluation. The Company has determined that the carrying value of
short-term investments has not been impaired.
NOTE 4 -
INVENTORIES
Inventories
are valued using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. An actual
valuation of inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of each
year based on the inventory levels and costs existing at that
time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations must necessarily be
based on management's estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and
costs. Because these are subject to many factors beyond management's
control, interim results are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory
valuation.
During
the nine month period ended October 3, 2009, inventory quantities were
reduced. If this reduction remains through year-end, it will result
in a liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities carried at lower costs prevailing
in prior years as compared with the current cost of
purchases. Although the effect of such a liquidation cannot be
precisely quantified at the present time, management believes that if a LIFO
liquidation continues to occur in 2009, the impact may be material to the
Company’s results of operations for the period but will not have a material
impact on the financial position of the Company.
9
Inventories
consist of the following (in thousands):
October
3, 2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
|||||||
Inventory
at FIFO
|
||||||||
Finished
products
|
$ | 3,419 | $ | 2,790 | ||||
Materials
and work in process
|
47,484 | 57,056 | ||||||
Gross
inventories
|
50,903 | 59,846 | ||||||
Less:
LIFO reserve
|
(41,310 | ) | (44,338 | ) | ||||
Less:
excess and obsolescence reserve
|
(2,545 | ) | (3,569 | ) | ||||
Net
inventories
|
$ | 7,048 | $ | 11,939 |
NOTE 5 -
INCOME TAXES
The
Company's 2009 effective tax rate differs from the statutory tax rate due
principally to state income taxes partially offset by tax benefits related to
the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. The effective income tax rate
for the three and nine months ended October 3, 2009 and September 27, 2008 is
38.0%. Income tax payments in the three and nine months ended October 3, 2009
totaled $3.3 million and $14.2 million, respectively. The Company was not
required to make income tax payments in the three and nine months ended
September 27, 2008 because of overpayments of estimated taxes in
2007.
The
Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various
state jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to
U.S. federal and state income tax examinations by tax authorities for years
before 2005. In the third quarter of 2007, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”)
completed an examination of the Company’s federal income tax return for 2005.
The IRS did not propose any adjustments as a result of this examination and has
accepted the Company’s return as filed. In the first quarter of 2009, the IRS
completed audits of the Company’s 2006 and 2007 federal income tax returns.
Adjustments resulting from this examination did not result in a material change
to the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
The
Company does not believe it has included any “uncertain tax positions” in its
federal income tax return or any of the state income tax returns it is currently
filing. The Company has made an evaluation of the potential impact of additional
state taxes being assessed by jurisdictions in which the Company does not
currently consider itself liable. The Company does not anticipate that such
additional taxes, if any, would result in a material change to its financial
position. However, the Company anticipates that it is more likely than not that
additional state tax liabilities in the range of $0.4 million to $0.7 million
exist. The Company has recorded $0.4 million relating to these
additional state income taxes, including approximately $0.2 million for the
payment of interest and penalties. This amount is included in income
taxes payable at October 3, 2009. The Company will include any future
interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of its
provision for taxes.
NOTE
6 - PENSION PLANS
|
The
Company has migrated its retirement benefit focus from defined benefit pension
plans to defined contribution retirement plans, utilizing its current 401(k)
plan.
In 2007,
the Company amended its hourly and salaried defined benefit pension plans so
that employees will no longer accrue benefits under them effective December 31,
2007. This action “froze” the benefits for all employees and
prevented future hires from joining the plans, effective December 31,
2007. Currently, the Company provides supplemental discretionary
contributions to substantially all employees’ individual 401(k)
accounts.
10
In 2009
and future years, the Company may be required to make cash contributions to the
two defined benefit pension plans according to the rules of the Pension
Protection Act of 2006. The annual contributions will be based on the
amount of the unfunded plan liabilities derived from the frozen benefits and
will not include liabilities for any future accrued benefits for any new or
existing participants. The total amount of these future cash
contributions will be dependent on the investment returns generated by the
plans’ assets and the then-applicable discount rates used to calculate the
plans’ liabilities.
There is
no minimum required cash contribution for the defined benefit plans for 2009,
but there may be such a requirement in future years. The Company
expects to voluntarily contribute approximately $2.0 million to the defined
benefit plans in 2009, of which $1.4 million was contributed in the first nine
months of 2009. The intent of this discretionary contribution is to
reduce the amount of time that the Company will be required to continue to
operate the frozen plans. The ongoing cost of running the plans (even
if frozen) is approximately $200,000 per year, which includes PBGC premiums,
actuary and audit fees, and other expenses.
In the
first quarter of 2009, the Company settled $2.0 million of pension liabilities
through the purchase of group annuities. This transaction resulted in
an insignificant actuarial gain.
In
February 2008, the Company made lump sum benefit payments to two participants in
its only non-qualified defined benefit plan, the Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan. These payments, which totaled $2.1 million,
represented the actuarial present value of the participants’ accrued benefit as
of the date of payment. Only one, retired participant remains in this
plan.
The
estimated cost of the frozen defined benefit plans for 2009 is $1.3 million, of
which $1.0 million was recognized in the first nine months of 2009.
Costs
attributable to the supplemental discretionary 401(k) plan totaled $0.5 million
and $1.4 million for the three and nine months ended October 3, 2009,
respectively, and $0.3 million and $1.0 million for the three and nine months
ended September 27, 2008, respectively. The Company plans to
contribute an additional $0.5 million to the plan during the remainder of
2009.
NOTE 7 –
SHARE BASED PAYMENTS
In April
2007, the Company adopted and the shareholders approved the 2007 Stock Incentive
Plan (the “2007 SIP”) under which employees, independent contractors, and
non-employee directors may be granted stock options, restricted stock, deferred
stock awards, and stock appreciation rights, any of which may or may not require
the satisfaction of performance objectives. Vesting requirements will
be determined by the Compensation Committee or the Board of
Directors. The Company has reserved 2,550,000 shares for issuance
under the 2007 SIP.
A summary
of changes in options outstanding under the plans is summarized
below:
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Grant
Date
Fair
Value
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2008
|
1,420,250 | $ | 9.02 | $ | 3.99 | |||||||
Granted
|
115,900 | $ | 8.69 | $ | 4.57 | |||||||
Exercised
|
(38,000 | ) | $ | 8.73 | $ | 2.56 | ||||||
Expired
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Outstanding
October 3, 2009
|
1,498,150 | $ | 9.00 | $ | 4.13 |
The
aggregate intrinsic value (mean market price at October 3, 2009 less the
weighted average exercise price) of options outstanding under the Plans was
approximately $5.3 million.
The
aggregate compensation expense for the options granted in the nine months ended
October 3, 2009, calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, was
$0.2 million. This expense, which is a non-cash item, is being
amortized in the Company’s statements of operations over the vesting
periods. Compensation costs related to all share-based payments
recognized in the statements of operations aggregated $0.5 million and $3.5
million for three and nine months ended October 3, 2009, respectively, and $0.2
million and $0.5 million for three and nine months ended September 27, 2008,
respectively.
11
In April
2008, deferred stock awards for 18,222 shares were issued to non-employee
directors, which vested in April 2009. Compensation expense related
to these awards was amortized ratably over the vesting period. The
total compensation expense related to these awards was $0.1 million. In April
2009, deferred stock awards for 12,444 shares were issued to non-employee
directors, which will vest in April 2010. Compensation expense
related to these awards will be amortized ratably over the vesting
period. The total compensation expense related to these awards was
$0.1 million.
In May
and August, 2009, deferred stock awards totaling 19,181 and 19,763 shares,
respectively, were issued to certain key employees. These awards require that
the Company meets certain financial objectives in order for the shares to vest.
It is anticipated that these objectives will be met by the end of 2009. The
total compensation expense related to these awards is $0.5 million and is being
amortized ratably over the expected vesting period.
In 2008,
25% of all officers’ annual incentive compensation was paid in restricted
stock. During the first quarter of 2009, awards totaling $0.2 million
were made under this policy. Beginning in 2009, all officer annual
incentive compensation will be paid in cash.
NOTE 8 -
BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
Weighted
average shares outstanding for the three and nine months ended October 3, 2009
were 19,069,749 and 19,057,636, respectively. Weighted average shares
outstanding for the three and nine months ended September 27, 2008 were
20,047,000 and 20,398,000, respectively.
Diluted
earnings per share reflect the impact of options outstanding using the treasury
stock method, when applicable. This resulted in diluted
weighted-average shares outstanding for the three and nine months ended October
3, 2009 of 19,377,000 and 19,208,000 respectively. Diluted
weighted-average shares outstanding for the three and nine months ended
September 27, 2008 were 20,054,000 and 20,429,000 shares,
respectively.
NOTE 9 -
CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
As of October 3, 2009, the Company was
a defendant in approximately six (6) lawsuits and is aware of certain other such
claims.
Lawsuits involving the Company’s
products generally fall into one of two categories:
(i)
|
Those
that claim damages from the Company related to allegedly defective product
design and/or manufacture which stem from a specific
incident. Pending lawsuits and claims are based principally on
the theory of “strict liability” but also may be based on negligence,
breach of warranty, and other legal theories;
or
|
(ii)
|
Those
brought by cities or other governmental entities, and individuals against
firearms manufacturers, distributors and retailers seeking to recover
damages allegedly arising out of the misuse of firearms by third-parties
in the commission of homicides, suicides and other shootings involving
juveniles and adults.
|
12
As to
lawsuits of the first type, management believes that, in every case involving
firearms, the allegations are unfounded, and that the shootings and any results
therefrom were due to negligence or misuse of the firearms by third-parties or
the claimant, and that there should be no recovery against the
Company.
The only
remaining lawsuit of the second type is the lawsuit filed by the City of
Gary. The complaint in that case seeks damages, among other things,
for the costs of medical care, police and emergency services, public health
services, and other services as well as punitive damages. In
addition, nuisance abatement and/or injunctive relief is sought to change the
design, manufacture, marketing and distribution practices of the various
defendants. The suit alleges, among other claims, negligence in the
design of products, public nuisance, negligent distribution and marketing,
negligence per se and deceptive advertising. The case does not allege
a specific injury to a specific individual as a result of the misuse or use of
any of the Company’s products. Market share allegations have been held
inapplicable by the Indiana Supreme Court.
The
Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of the Gary case by the
trial court, but the Indiana Supreme Court reversed this dismissal and remanded
the case for discovery proceedings on December 23, 2003. On November
23, 2005, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to the Protection of
Lawful Commerce in Arms Act ("PLCAA"). The state court judge held the
PLCAA unconstitutional and the defendants filed a motion with the Indiana Court
of Appeals asking it to accept interlocutory appeal on the issue, which appeal
was accepted on February 5, 2007. On October 29, 2007, the Indiana
Appellate Court affirmed, holding that the PLCAA does not apply to the City’s
claims. A petition for rehearing was filed in the Appellate Court and
denied on January 9, 2008. On February 8, 2008, a Petition to
Transfer the appeal to the Supreme Court of Indiana was filed. The
petition was denied on January 13, 2009 and the case was remanded to the trial
court. No trial date has been set.
In
addition to the foregoing, on August 18, 2009, the Company was served with a
complaint captioned Steamfitters Local 449
Pension Fund, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Sturm,
Ruger & Co. Inc., et
al.
pending in the United States District Court for the District of
Connecticut. The complaint seeks unspecified damages for alleged
violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is a purported class
action on behalf of purchasers of the Company’s common stock between April 23,
2007 and October 29, 2007. On October 9, 2009, the Company waived
service of a complaint captioned Alan R. Herrett,
Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Sturm, Ruger
& Co. Inc., et
al.
pending in the United States District Court for the District of
Connecticut. This matter is based upon the same facts and basic
allegations set forth in the Steamfitters Local 449
Pension Fund litigation. On October 13, 2009, a motion to
consolidate the two actions was filed by counsel for the
Steamfitters.
On
September 11, 2009, the Company was served with a complaint captioned Secretary of Labor v. Sturm,
Ruger & Co. Inc. pending before the Occupational Safety and Health
Review Commission. The complaint arises out of a Notice of Contest
filed by the Company pursuant to an OSHA inspection conducted at the Company’s
manufacturing facility in Newport, New Hampshire. A trial has been scheduled for
March 9, 2010.
Punitive
damages, as well as compensatory damages, are demanded in certain of the
lawsuits and claims. Aggregate claimed amounts presently exceed
product liability accruals and applicable insurance coverage. For
claims made after July 10, 2000, coverage is provided on an annual basis for
losses exceeding $5 million per claim, or an aggregate maximum loss of $10
million annually, except for certain new claims which might be brought by
governments or municipalities after July 10, 2000, which are excluded from
coverage.
The
Company’s management monitors the status of known claims and the product
liability accrual, which includes amounts for asserted and unasserted
claims. While it is not possible to forecast the outcome of
litigation or the timing of costs, in the opinion of management, after
consultation with special and corporate counsel, it is not probable and is
unlikely that litigation, including punitive damage claims, will have a material
adverse effect on the financial position of the Company, but may have a material
impact on the Company’s financial results for a particular period.
13
Product
liability claim payments are made when appropriate if, as, and when claimants
and the Company reach agreement upon an amount to finally resolve all
claims. Legal costs are paid as the lawsuits and claims develop, the
timing of which may vary greatly from case to case. A time schedule
cannot be determined in advance with any reliability concerning when payments
will be made in any given case.
Provision
is made for product liability claims based upon many factors related to the
severity of the alleged injury and potential liability exposure, based upon
prior claim experience. Because our experience in defending these
lawsuits and claims is that unfavorable outcomes are typically not probable or
estimable, only in rare cases is an accrual established for such
costs. In most cases, an accrual is established only for estimated
legal defense costs. Product liability accruals are periodically
reviewed to reflect then-current estimates of possible liabilities and expenses
incurred to date and reasonably anticipated in the future. Threatened
product liability claims are reflected in our product liability accrual on the
same basis as actual claims; i.e., an accrual is made for reasonably anticipated
possible liability and claims-handling expenses on an ongoing
basis.
A range
of reasonably possible loss relating to unfavorable outcomes cannot be
made. However, in product liability cases in which a dollar amount of
damages is claimed, the amount of damages claimed, which totaled $12.2 million
and $5.0 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, are set forth
as an indication of possible maximum liability that the Company might be
required to incur in these cases (regardless of the likelihood or reasonable
probability of any or all of this amount being awarded to claimants) as a result
of adverse judgments that are sustained on appeal.
The
Company has reported all cases instituted against it through July 4, 2009 and
the results of those cases, where terminated, to the S.E.C. on its previous Form
10-K and 10-Q reports to which reference is hereby made.
NOTE 10 –
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In the
first quarter of 2008, the Company made lump sum pension benefit payments to
William B. Ruger, Jr., the former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Stephen L. Sanetti, the former President of the
Company. These payments totaled $2.1 million which represented the
actuarially determined present value of the accrued benefits payable to these
individuals under the Supplementary Executive Retirement Plan as of the date of
payment.
14
NOTE 11 -
OPERATING SEGMENT INFORMATION
The
Company has two reportable segments: firearms and investment
castings. The firearms segment manufactures and sells rifles,
pistols, revolvers, and shotguns principally to a select number of independent
wholesale distributors primarily located in the United States. The
investment castings segment manufactures and sells steel investment
castings. Selected operating segment financial information follows
(in thousands):
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
October
3,
2009
|
September
27,
2008
|
October
3,
2009
|
September
27,
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Net
Sales
|
||||||||||||||||
Firearms
|
$ | 70,011 | $ | 40,318 | $ | 203,611 | $ | 117,186 | ||||||||
Castings
|
||||||||||||||||
Unaffiliated
|
1,175 | 1,504 | 3,495 | 5,806 | ||||||||||||
Intersegment
|
3,757 | 1,886 | 12,796 | 7,532 | ||||||||||||
4,932 | 3,390 | 16,291 | 13,338 | |||||||||||||
Eliminations
|
(3,757 | ) | (1,886 | ) | (12,796 | ) | (7,532 | ) | ||||||||
$ | 71,186 | $ | 41,822 | $ | 207,106 | $ | 122,992 | |||||||||
Income
(Loss) Before Income Taxes
|
||||||||||||||||
Firearms
|
$ | 11,702 | $ | 1,262 | $ | 35,727 | $ | 6,870 | ||||||||
Castings
|
(350 | ) | (701 | ) | (975 | ) | (2,487 | ) | ||||||||
Corporate
|
112 | 40 | 78 | 306 | ||||||||||||
$ | 11,464 | $ | 601 | $ | 34,830 | $ | 4,689 | |||||||||
October
3,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||||||||||||||
Identifiable
Assets
|
||||||||||||||||
Firearms
|
$ | 63,715 | $ | 63,042 | ||||||||||||
Castings
|
4,727 | 4,842 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate
|
71,505 | 44,876 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 139,947 | $ | 112,760 |
NOTE 12 –
STOCK REPURCHASE
In
November 2008, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized a $5
million stock repurchase program. During the first nine months of
2009, the Company repurchased approximately 2,400 shares of its common stock
under a 10b5-1 program, representing 0.01% of the outstanding shares, in the
open market at an average price of $6.03 per share. These purchases
were made with cash held by the Company and no debt was incurred. At
October 3, 2009, $4.7 million remained available for share repurchases under
this repurchase program.
NOTE 13 –
LINE OF CREDIT
In
December 2008, the Company renewed a $25 million credit facility with a bank
which expires on December 13, 2009. Borrowings under this facility
bear interest at LIBOR plus 200 basis points. The unused fee is 50
basis points per year on the unused portion of the credit
facility. During the first quarter of 2009, the Company paid down the
$1 million balance on its $25 million credit facility, in response to the
relative improvement in the global financial and credit markets. The
credit facility remains unused.
15
NOTE
14 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
|
On
October 27, 2009, the Company declared a dividend of 9.6¢ per share to
shareholders of record on November 13, 2009.
The
Company has evaluated events through October 28, 2009, the date the financial
statements were issued, and determined that there were no events occurring
subsequent to October 3, 2009 that would have a material impact on the Company’s
results of operations or financial position.
ITEM
2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
Company
Overview
Sturm,
Ruger & Company, Inc. (the “Company”) is principally engaged in the design,
manufacture, and sale of firearms to domestic
customers. Approximately 98% of the Company’s total sales for the
three and nine months ended October 3, 2009 were firearms sales, and 2% were
investment castings sales. Export sales represent less than 4% of
total sales. The Company’s design and manufacturing operations are
located in the United States and almost all product content is
domestic. The Company’s firearms are sold through a select number of
independent wholesale distributors principally to the commercial sporting
market.
The
Company manufactures investment castings made from steel alloys for internal use
in its firearms and utilizes excess investment casting capacity to manufacture
and sell castings to unaffiliated, third-party customers.
Because
most of the Company’s competitors are not subject to public filing requirements
and industry-wide data is generally not available in a timely manner, the
Company is unable to compare its performance to other companies or specific
current industry trends. Instead, the Company measures itself against
its own historical results.
The
Company does not consider its overall firearms business to be predictably
seasonal; however, sales of many models of firearms are usually lower in the
third quarter of the year.
Results of
Operations
Product
Demand
The
incoming order rate in the third quarter of 2009 declined significantly from
recent prior quarters, but we estimate that the sell-through of our products
from distributors to retailers only declined a modest amount. We believe that
the reduction in the incoming order rate was due in part to our distributors
reacting to the following factors:
|
·
|
The
large backlog of unshipped distributor orders (orders placed by
distributors for the Company’s products), which discouraged additional
orders,
|
|
·
|
Stronger
inventories throughout the distribution
channel,
|
|
·
|
Continued
reduction in the industry-wide surge in consumer demand that began in the
fourth quarter of 2008, and
|
|
·
|
Prolonged
ammunition shortages and high ammunition prices at retail, which
discouraged retail firearms sales.
|
16
The
extraordinary retail demand that began in the fourth quarter of 2008 caused the
distributors to place very large orders for our products, particularly during
the first quarter of 2009 when orders from distributors substantially exceeded
their sales of our products to retailers. This resulted in the
Company having an abnormally large backlog of unshipped distributor orders, and
during the third quarter of 2009 the distributors ordered substantially less of
our products than they were selling through to retailers. We expect
this trend to continue until the backlog of unshipped orders has been reduced to
more traditional levels.
Therefore,
the Company has temporarily placed less emphasis on incoming orders as a
planning metric. Instead, the Company is using the following estimate
of sell-through of our products from distributors to retailers as a proxy for
actual market demand and as a metric for planning production. Note,
however, that we believe a portion of the third quarter 2009 sell-through from
distributors to retailers resulted in an inventory build at retail rather than
sales from retailers to consumers (i.e., our sell-through estimate likely
overstates the true market demand in the third quarter of 2009).
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Q3
|
Q2
|
Q1
|
Q4
|
Q3
|
Q2
|
Q1
|
||
Units
Ordered (1)
|
80,000
|
204,700
|
501,000
|
270,400
|
125,700
|
120,300
|
260,100
|
|
Estimated
Units Sold from Distributors to Retailers (2)
|
214,500
|
227,500
|
236,000
|
216,400
|
143,100
|
135,600
|
135.900
|
|
Units
on Backorder (1)
|
240,700
|
412,300
|
458,900
|
175,900
|
115,300
|
137,700
|
157,100
|
Note
1:
|
During
the third quarter of 2009, the Company unilaterally cancelled all of the
unshipped orders for Mini-14 and Mini-Thirty autoloading rifles, and asked
the distributors to submit new orders that better represented their
forecasted needs. The cancellation of these unshipped orders,
partially offset by the submission of new orders for these products,
resulted in a net reduction to the backlog of approximately 34,000 units
or $20 million. Had these orders not been cancelled, the Units
Ordered in the third quarter would have been approximately 114,000
units.
|
Note
2:
|
The
estimates for each period were calculated by taking the beginning
inventory at the distributors, plus shipments from the Company to
distributors during the period, less the ending inventory at distributors.
These estimates are only a proxy for actual market demand as
they:
|
|
·
|
Rely
on data provided by independent distributors that are not verified by the
Company,
|
|
·
|
Do
not consider potential timing issues within the distribution channel,
including goods-in-transit, and
|
|
·
|
Do
not consider fluctuations in inventory at
retail.
|
17
Estimated
sell-through from distributors to retail in the third quarter of 2009 decreased
by approximately 6% from the second quarter of 2009. However, when
compared to the third quarter of 2008, estimated sell-through from distributors
to retailers of the Company’s products increased approximately 50%. This
year-over-year growth substantially exceeded the 11% growth in National Instant
Criminal Background Check System (NICS*) background checks over the same period,
suggesting the likelihood of some market share gain by the Company and some
increase in inventory at the retailers. The total number of NICS background
checks for the past seven quarters follows:
(Number
of NICS* background checks in 000’s)
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Q3
|
Q2
|
Q1
|
Q4
|
Q3
|
Q2
|
Q1
|
||
Total
NICS* Background
Checks
|
3,134
|
3,217
|
3,818
|
4,236
|
2,821
|
2,647
|
3,005
|
|
*
|
While
NICS background checks are not a precise measure of retail activity, they
are commonly used as a proxy for retail demand. NICS background
checks are performed when the ownership of most firearms, either new or
used, is transferred. NICS background checks are also performed for permit
applications, permit renewals, and other administrative reasons.
|
Sixty
percent of the $29.6 million year-over-year sales growth in the third quarter of
2009 was attributable to products introduced since January
2008.
Summary Unit
Data
Firearms
unit data for the last seven quarters are as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Q3
|
Q2
|
Q1
|
Q4
|
Q3
|
Q2
|
Q1
|
||
Units
Ordered (3)
|
80,000
|
204,700
|
501,000
|
270,400
|
125,700
|
120,300
|
260,100
|
|
Units
Produced
|
242,500
|
247,300
|
209,900
|
167,100
|
158,900
|
150,600
|
124,000
|
|
Units
Shipped
|
237,400
|
246,200
|
213,700
|
208,100
|
146,000
|
136,700
|
135,700
|
|
Average
Sales Price
|
$295
|
$286
|
$283
|
$275
|
$276
|
$270
|
$296
|
|
Units
on Backorder (3)
|
240,700
|
412,300
|
458,900
|
175,900
|
115,300
|
137,700
|
157,100
|
Note
3:
|
See
description in Note 1 above for information relating to Q3 2009 order
cancelations.
|
18
While the
distributor inventory of some of the Company’s products may have reached normal
stocking levels, distributor inventory of other products where demand continues
to outstrip supply remains lower than normal. Inventory data for the
trailing seven quarters follows:
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||
Q3
|
Q2
|
Q1
|
Q4
|
Q3
|
Q2
|
Q1
|
|||||||||
Units
– Company Inventory
|
15,100
|
9,600
|
8,800
|
12,400
|
52,600
|
40,200
|
24,900
|
||||||||
Units
– Distributor Inventory (4)
|
76,800
|
53,900
|
35,200
|
57,500
|
65,800
|
62,900
|
61,800
|
||||||||
Total
inventory (5)
|
91,900
|
63,500
|
44,000
|
69,900
|
118,400
|
103,100
|
86,700
|
Note
4:
|
Distributor
ending inventory as provided by the Company’s independent distributors.
These numbers do not include goods-in-transit inventory that has been
shipped from the Company but not yet received by the
distributors.
|
Note
5:
|
This
total does not include inventory at retailers. The Company does not have
access to data on retailer inventories of the Company’s
products.
|
Orders Received and Ending
Backlog
The gross
value of orders received and ending backlog for the trailing seven quarters are
as follows (in millions except average sales price, including Federal Excise
Tax):
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Q3
|
Q2
|
Q1
|
Q4
|
Q3
|
Q2
|
Q1
|
||
Orders
Received (6)
|
$15.7
|
$81.8
|
$154.3
|
$86.1
|
$33.5
|
$37.0
|
$73.8
|
|
Average
Sales Price of Orders Received (6) (7)
|
$196
|
$400
|
$308
|
$287
|
$267
|
$275
|
$257
|
|
Ending
Backlog (7)
|
$78.0
|
$138.0
|
$136.3
|
$47.8
|
$27.9
|
$33.7
|
$40.7
|
|
Average
Sales Price of Ending Backlog (6) (7)
|
$324
|
$335
|
$297
|
$269
|
$242
|
$245
|
$234
|
Note
6:
|
See
description in Note 1 above for information relating to Q3 2009 order
cancellations. The cancellation of these orders reduced Orders Received in
the third quarter of 2009 by $20 million and decreased the Average Sales
Price of Orders Received by $115 per unit. Had these orders not
been cancelled, the Average Sales Price of Orders Received would have been
$311 per unit. The Average Sales Price of the Ending Backlog
was also impacted for the same
reasons.
|
Note
7:
|
Average
sales price for orders received and ending backlog is net of Federal
Excise Tax of 10% for handguns and 11% for long
guns.
|
19
The
decrease in the average sales price of orders received in the third quarter of
2009 compared to the second quarter of 2009 is due to the net cancellation of
34,000 Mini-14 and Mini-Thirty rifles in the third quarter of 2009, as discussed
in Note 1 above. In the second quarter of 2009, the average sales
price of orders received was higher than usual due to the initial stocking
orders received for the SR-556 rifle, which has a higher price relative to the
other product lines. The SR-556 rifle was introduced in the second
quarter of 2009 and shipments of the SR-556 began late in the second quarter of
2009. Few orders for the SR-556 were received in the third quarter of
2009, as a large backlog for this product remains from the orders received upon
its introduction.
Production and
Inventories
Total
unit production in the third quarter of 2009 decreased slightly from the second
quarter of 2009 due to a scheduled annual one-week shutdown of the Company’s
largest firearms plant and increased overall focus on better matching production
rates to estimated retail demand by product. The Company plans to
produce at rates moderately in excess of estimated retail demand for certain
products to replenish finished goods safety stock at the Company.
The
Company’s finished goods inventory increased slightly during the third quarter
of 2009. The Company anticipates that finished goods inventory could increase by
as much as $15 million from the current level upon the attainment of desired
levels of finished goods inventory.
Distributor
inventory increased in the third quarter of 2009 and is now at a more historical
aggregate level.
Sales
Consolidated
net sales were $71.2 million for the three months ended October 3,
2009. This represents an increase of $29.4 million or 70.2% from
consolidated net sales of $41.8 million in the comparable prior year
period.
For the
nine months ended October 3, 2009, consolidated net sales were $207.1 million,
an increase of $84.1 million or 68.4% from sales of $123.0 million in the
comparable 2008 period.
Firearms
net sales were $70.0 million for the three months ended October 3,
2009. This represents an increase of $29.7 million or 73.6% from
firearms net sales of $40.3 million in the comparable prior year
period.
For the
nine months ended October 3, 2009, firearms net sales were $203.6
million. This represents an increase of $86.4 million or 73.8% from
firearms net sales of $117.2 million in the comparable 2008 period.
Firearms
unit shipments increased 62.5% and 65.8% for the three and nine months ended
October 3, 2009, respectively, compared to the comparable prior year periods due
to increased shipments of pistols, rifles and revolvers. These
increases are attributable to continued strong demand for most product lines and
increased production of both new and mature products throughout the first nine
months of 2009 compared to the prior year periods.
Casting
net sales were $1.2 million for the three months ended October 3,
2009. This represents a decrease of $0.3 million or 21.9% from
casting sales of $1.5 million in the comparable prior year period.
For the
nine months ended October 3, 2009, casting net sales were $3.5
million. This represents a decrease of $2.3 million or 39.8% from
casting sales of $5.8 million in the comparable prior year period.
20
Cost of Products Sold and
Gross Margin
Consolidated
cost of products sold was $49.4 million for the three months ended October 3,
2009. This represents an increase of $14.4 million or 41.3% from
consolidated cost of products sold of $35.0 million in the comparable prior year
period.
For the
nine months ended October 3, 2009, consolidated cost of products sold was $140.8
million. This represents an increase of $43.8 million or 45.1% from
consolidated cost of products sold of $97.0 million in the comparable prior year
period.
21
Gross
margin as a percent of sales was 30.6% and 32.0% for the three and nine months
ended October 3, 2009. This represents an increase from
the gross margin percentages of 16.4% and 21.2% in the comparable prior year
periods as illustrated below (in thousands):
Three
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
October
3, 2009
|
September
27, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 71,186 | 100.0 | % | $ | 41,822 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost
of products sold, before LIFO, overhead and labor rate adjustments to
inventory, product liability, and product recall
|
48,904 | 68.8 | % | 30,372 | 72.6 | % | ||||||||||
LIFO
(income) expense
|
(1,502 | ) | (2.1 | )% | 1,577 | 3.8 | % | |||||||||
Overhead
rate adjustments to inventory
|
972 | 1.3 | % | 48 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||
Labor
rate adjustments to inventory
|
302 | 0.4 | % | 569 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||
Product
liability
|
699 | 1.0 | % | 129 | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||
Product
recall
|
29 | - | 2,269 | 5.4 | % | |||||||||||
Total
cost of products sold
|
49,404 | 69.4 | % | 34,964 | 83.6 | % | ||||||||||
Gross
margin
|
$ | 21,782 | 30.6 | % | $ | 6,858 | 16.4 | % |
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
October
3, 2009
|
September
27, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 207,106 | 100.0 | % | $ | 122,992 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost
of products sold, before LIFO, overhead and labor rate adjustments to
inventory, product liability, and product recall
|
137,831 | 66.6 | % | 91,995 | 74.8 | % | ||||||||||
LIFO
(income) expense
|
(2,680 | ) | (1.3 | )% | 3,807 | 3.1 | % | |||||||||
Overhead
rate adjustments to inventory
|
2,732 | 1.3 | % | (1,479 | ) | (1.2 | )% | |||||||||
Labor
rate adjustments to inventory
|
759 | 0.4 | % | (1,311 | ) | (1.1 | )% | |||||||||
Product
liability
|
1,447 | 0.7 | % | 496 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||
Product
recall
|
677 | 0.3 | % | 3,477 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||||
Total
cost of products sold
|
140,766 | 68.0 | % | 96,985 | 78.8 | % | ||||||||||
Gross
margin
|
$ | 66,340 | 32.0 | % | $ | 26,007 | 21.2 | % |
22
Cost of products sold,
before LIFO, overhead and labor rate adjustments to inventory, product
liability, and product recall—During the three and nine months ended
October 3, 2009, cost of products sold, before LIFO, overhead and labor rate
adjustments to inventory, product liability, and product recall decreased as a
percentage of sales by 3.8% and 8.2%, respectively, compared with the comparable
2008 periods.
This
improvement was due to:
·
|
Greater
efficiency in direct labor,
|
·
|
Savings
in purchased materials, supplies and
services,
|
·
|
Greater
efficiency in non-personnel, variable overhead spending,
and
|
·
|
The
leveraging of fixed overhead
expenses.
|
This
improvement was partially offset by:
·
|
Cost
overruns related to the new SR-556,
|
·
|
Underabsorption
of fixed costs in investment
castings,
|
·
|
Change
in firearms sales mix, and
|
·
|
Increased
new product development and process improvement engineering
expenses.
|
LIFO—During the three
and nine months ended October 3, 2009, gross inventories decreased by $0.9
million and $8.9 million, respectively, compared to increases in gross
inventories of $0.4 million and $3.3 million in the comparable 2008
periods. As a result, in the three and nine months ended October 3,
2009 the Company recognized LIFO income resulting in decreased cost of products
sold of $1.5 million and $2.7 million, respectively, compared to LIFO expense
and increased cost of products sold of $1.6 million and $3.8 million in the
comparable 2008 periods.
Overhead Rate
Adjustments— The Company uses actual overhead expenses incurred as a
percentage of sales value of production over a trailing six month period to
absorb overhead expense into inventory. During the three and nine
months ended October 3, 2009, the overhead rates used to absorb overhead
expenses into inventory declined, resulting in decreases in inventory value of
$1.0 million and $2.7 million, respectively. These decreases in
inventory carrying values resulted in increases to cost of products
sold. In the third quarter of 2008 the overhead rate used to absorb
overhead expenses into inventory decreased slightly, resulting in a decrease in
inventory value of $48,000 and a corresponding increase to cost of products
sold. In the nine months ended September 27, 2008, the overhead rate
used to absorb overhead into inventory increased, resulting in an increase in
inventory value of $1.5 million, and a corresponding decrease to cost of
products sold.
Labor Rate
Adjustments— The Company uses actual direct labor expense incurred as a
percentage of sales value of production over a trailing six month period to
absorb direct labor expense into inventory. During the three and nine
months ended October 3, 2009, the labor rates used to absorb incurred labor
expenses into inventory declined, resulting in decreases in inventory value of
$0.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively. These decreases in
inventory carrying values resulted in increases to cost of products
sold. In the third quarter of 2008, the standard labor rates used to
absorb incurred labor expenses into inventory decreased, resulting in a decrease
in inventory value of $0.6 million, and a corresponding increase to cost of
products sold. In the nine months ended September 27, 2008, the
standard labor rates used to absorb incurred labor expenses into inventory
increased, resulting in an increase in inventory value of $1.3 million, and a
corresponding decrease to cost of products sold.
Product
Liability—Product liability expenses include the cost of outside legal
fees, insurance, and other expenses incurred in the management and defense of
product liability matters. During the three and nine months ended
October 3, 2009, the Company incurred product liability expense of $0.7 million
and $1.4 million, respectively. For the comparable 2008 periods,
product liability expenses totaled $0.1 million and $0.5 million,
respectively. See Note 9 to the notes to the financial statements
“Contingent Liabilities” for further discussion of the Company’s product
liability.
23
Product Recalls—In
2008, the Company received a small number of reports from the field that its SR9
pistols, and later, its LCP pistols, could discharge if dropped onto a hard
surface. The Company began recalling SR9 pistols in April 2008 and
LCP pistols in October 2008 to offer free safety retrofits. The
estimated cost of these safety retrofit programs of approximately $3.5 million
was recorded in 2008. During the first quarter of 2009, it became
apparent that the recalls were more successful than originally forecast and a
greater quantity of affected pistols would be retrofitted than originally
estimated. Therefore, an additional expense of $0.6 million was
recognized in the first quarter of 2009. The quantity of pistols
being returned to the Company for retrofitting has declined significantly since
the first quarter of 2009. Therefore only modest retrofit expenses have been
recorded in the second and third quarters of 2009.
Gross Margin—For the
three and nine months ended October 3, 2009, gross margin was $21.8 million and
$66.3 million or 30.6% and 32.0% of sales, respectively. This is an
increase of $14.9 million and $40.3 million or 218% and 155% from the comparable
prior year periods gross margin of $6.9 million and $26.0 million, or 16.4% and
21.2% of sales.
Selling, General and
Administrative
Selling,
general and administrative expenses were $9.7 million and $30.8 million, or
13.6% and 14.9% of sales, for the three and nine months ended October 3, 2009,
respectively. This represents an increase of $3.2 million and $8.9
million from selling, general and administrative expenses of $6.5 million and
$21.9 million, or 15.5% and 17.8% of sales, in the comparable prior year
periods. The increase in expense reflects greater personnel-related
expenses, increased sales promotion and advertising expenses, and increased
shipping expenses.
Other Operating
Expenses
In the
three months ended October 3, 2009, the Company recognized an expense of $0.8
million related to the demolition of most of its 300,000 square foot Dorr Woolen
Building which began in the third quarter of 2009. A portion of the
building will remain and will be refurbished, and will continue to serve as the
firearms warehouse in New Hampshire. The remaining cost of this
demolition and refurbishment is expected to be approximately $1.5 million, and
will be incurred over the next three quarters.
Other
income
Other
income was $0.1 million in both the three and nine months ended October 3, 2009
compared to income of $0.2 million and $0.6 million the three and nine months
ended September 27, 2008.
Income Taxes and Net
Income
The
effective income tax rate in the three and nine months ended October 3, 2009 and
September 27, 2008 was 38.0%.
As a
result of the foregoing factors, consolidated net income was $7.1 million and
$21.6 million for the three and nine months ended October 3, 2009,
respectively. This represents an increase of $6.7 million and $18.7
million from consolidated net income of $0.4 million and $2.9 million in the
comparable prior year periods.
Financial
Condition
Liquidity
At the
end of the third quarter of 2009, our cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments totaled $53.1 million. Our pre-LIFO working capital of
$102.3 million, less the LIFO reserve of $41.3 million, resulted in working
capital of $61.0 million and a current ratio of 2.8 to 1.
24
As the
current surge in demand subsides, the Company expects to replenish its finished
goods inventory. This planned replenishment to levels that will better
serve our customers could increase the value of finished goods inventory by as
much as $15 million from current depressed levels. The cash that will be
used by this increase in finished goods inventory would be partially offset by a
reduction in accounts receivable which would be expected during a period of
reduced sales.
During
the first quarter of 2009, the Company paid down the $1 million balance on its
$25 million credit facility, in response to the relative improvement in the
global financial and credit markets. The credit facility, which
expires on December 13, 2009, remains unused and the Company has no
debt.
Operations
Cash
provided by operating activities was $38.7 million for the nine months ended
October 3, 2009 compared to $0.6 million for the comparable prior year
period. The increase in cash provided in 2009 compared to 2008 is
principally attributable to the increased profitability in 2009, and decreased
inventories in 2009 compared to increased inventories in 2008.
Third
parties supply the Company with various raw materials for its firearms and
castings, such as fabricated steel components, walnut, birch, beech, maple and
laminated lumber for rifle stocks, wax, ceramic material, metal alloys, various
synthetic products and other component parts. There is a limited
supply of these materials in the marketplace at any given time, which can cause
the purchase prices to vary based upon numerous market factors. The
Company believes that it has adequate quantities of raw materials in inventory
to provide ample time to locate and obtain additional items at then-current
market cost without interruption of its manufacturing
operations. However, if market conditions result in a significant
prolonged inflation of certain prices or if adequate quantities of raw materials
cannot be obtained, the Company’s manufacturing processes could be interrupted
and the Company’s financial condition or results of operations could be
materially adversely affected.
Investing and
Financing
Capital
expenditures for the nine months ended October 3, 2009 totaled $10.3
million. In 2009, the Company expects to spend approximately $13
million on capital expenditures to purchase tooling for new product
introductions, to upgrade and modernize manufacturing equipment, and to increase
capacity for certain products in strong demand. The Company finances,
and intends to continue to finance, all of these activities with cash provided
by operations and current cash and short-term investments.
Dividends
of $4.0 million were paid during the nine months ended October 3,
2009.
On
October 27, 2009, the Company declared a dividend of 9.6¢ per share to
shareholders of record on November 13, 2009. The amount of this
dividend was based on a percentage of operating profit after adjustment for
certain items, the same approach used by the Company in the first two quarters
of 2009. Under this approach, the amount of the quarterly dividend
fluctuates directly with certain operating results of the
Company. The payment of future dividends depends on many factors,
including internal estimates of future performance, then-current cash and
short-term investments, and the Company’s need for cash.
In 2007,
the Company amended its hourly and salaried defined benefit pension plans so
that employees no longer accrue benefits under them effective December 31,
2007. This action “froze” the benefits for all employees and
prevented future hires from joining the plans, effective December 31,
2007. Currently, the Company provides supplemental discretionary
contributions to substantially all employees’ individual 401(k)
accounts.
In 2010
and future years, the Company may be required to make cash contributions to the
two defined benefit pension plans according to the new rules of the Pension
Protection Act of 2006. The annual contributions will be based on the
amount of the unfunded plan liabilities derived from the frozen benefits and
will not include liabilities for any future accrued benefits for any new or
existing participants. The total amount of these future cash
contributions will depend on the investment returns generated by the plans’
assets and the then-applicable discount rates used to calculate the plans’
liabilities.
25
There is
no minimum required cash contribution for the defined benefit plans for 2009,
but there may be such a requirement in future years. The Company
expects to voluntarily contribute approximately $2.0 million to the defined
benefit plans in 2009, of which $1.4 million was contributed through October 3,
2009. The intent of this discretionary contribution is to reduce the
amount of time that the Company will be required to continue to operate the
frozen plans. The ongoing cost of running the plans (even if frozen)
is approximately $200,000 per year, which includes PBGC premiums, actuary and
audit fees, and other expenses.
In the
first quarter of 2009, the Company settled $2.0 million of pension liabilities
through the purchase of group annuities. This transaction resulted in
an insignificant actuarial gain.
Based on
its unencumbered assets, the Company believes it has the ability to raise
substantial amounts of cash through issuance of short-term or long-term
debt. In 2007, the Company established an unsecured $25 million
credit facility. At December 31, 2008, $1.0 million was outstanding
from this credit facility. During the first quarter of 2009, the
Company paid down the $1.0 million balance on its $25 million credit facility,
in response to the relative improvement in the global financial and credit
markets. The credit facility, which expires on December 13, 2009,
remains unused.
In
November 2008, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized a $5
million stock repurchase program. During the first nine months of
2009, the Company repurchased approximately 2,400 shares of its common stock
under a 10b5-1 program, representing 0.01% of the outstanding shares, in the
open market at an average price of $6.03 per share. These purchases
were made with cash held by the Company and no debt was incurred. At
October 3, 2009, $4.7 million remained available for share repurchases under
this repurchase program.
The
Company began the demolition of most of its 300,000 square foot Dorr Woolen
Building during the third quarter of 2009. A portion of the building
will remain and be will refurbished, and will continue to serve as the firearms
warehouse in New Hampshire. The remaining cost of this demolition and
refurbishment is expected to be approximately $1.5 million, and will be incurred
over the next three quarters.
Other Operational
Matters
In the
normal course of its manufacturing operations, the Company is subject to
occasional governmental proceedings and orders pertaining to workplace safety,
waste disposal, air emissions and water discharges into the
environment. During the three months ended October 3, 2009, the
Company was served with a complaint captioned Secretary of Labor v. Sturm,
Ruger & Co. Inc. pending before the Occupational Safety and Health
Review Commission. The complaint arises out of a Notice of Contest
filed by the Company pursuant to an OSHA inspection conducted at the Company’s
manufacturing facility in Newport, New Hampshire. The Company
believes that it is generally in compliance with applicable environmental and
safety regulations and the outcome of this proceeding and any other proceedings
or orders will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position or
results of operations of the Company.
The
Company self-insures a significant amount of its product liability, workers’
compensation, medical, and other insurance. It also carries
significant deductible amounts on various insurance policies.
The
valuation of the future defined-benefit pension obligations at December 31, 2008
and 2007 indicated that these plans were underfunded by $16.9 million and $4.8
million, respectively, and resulted in a cumulative other comprehensive loss of
$23.0 million and $13.4 million on the Company’s balance sheet at December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
The
Company expects to realize its deferred tax assets through tax deductions
against future taxable income.
26
Adjustments to Critical
Accounting Policies
The
Company has not made any adjustments to its critical accounting estimates and
assumptions described in the Company’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on
February 24, 2009, or the judgments affecting the application of those estimates
and assumptions.
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements:
In June
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued ASC 105-10
(formerly SFAS 168), “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” ASC 105-10
will become the authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by
nongovernment entities. It also modifies the GAAP hierarchy to include only two
levels of GAAP; authoritative and non-authoritative. ASC 105-10 is effective for
financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after
September 15, 2009. Therefore, the Company adopted ASC 105-10 for the reporting
in our 2009 third quarter. The adoption did not have a significant impact on the
Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In July
2009, the FASB issued ASC 855-10 (formally SFAS No. 165) “Subsequent Events,”
which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events
that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are
issued or are available to be issued. The pronouncement requires the
disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events
and the basis for that date, that is, whether that date represents the date the
financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. This disclosure
should alert all users of financial statements that an entity has not evaluated
subsequent events after that date in the set of financial statements being
presented. The Company adopted FAS 165 during the quarter ended July
4, 2009.
Forward-Looking Statements
and Projections
The
Company may, from time to time, make forward-looking statements and projections
concerning future expectations. Such statements are based on current
expectations and are subject to certain qualifying risks and uncertainties, such
as market demand, sales levels of firearms, anticipated castings sales and
earnings, the need for external financing for operations or capital
expenditures, the results of pending litigation against the Company including
lawsuits filed by mayors, state attorneys general and other governmental
entities and membership organizations, and the impact of future firearms control
and environmental legislation, any one or more of which could cause actual
results to differ materially from those projected. Readers are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which
speak only as of the date made. The Company undertakes no obligation
to publish revised forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances
after the date such forward-looking statements are made or to reflect the
occurrence of subsequent unanticipated events.
ITEM
3.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
|
The
Company is exposed to changes in prevailing market interest rates affecting the
return on its investments but does not consider this interest rate market risk
exposure to be material to its financial condition or results of
operations. The Company invests primarily in United States Treasury
instruments, all maturing within one year. The carrying amount of
these investments approximates fair value due to the short-term
maturities. Under its current policies, the Company does not use
derivative financial instruments, derivative commodity instruments or other
financial instruments to manage its exposure to changes in interest rates or
commodity prices.
27
ITEM
4. CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
The
Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer and Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the
effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (the
“Disclosure Controls and Procedures”), as such term is defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the “Exchange Act”), as of October 3, 2009.
Based on
the evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that, as of October 3, 2009, such disclosure
controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in the Company’s periodic reports filed under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and
forms. Additionally, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the
period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, there have been no changes
in the Company’s control over financial reporting that occurred during the
quarter ended October 3, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Company’s control over financial
reporting.
PART
II. OTHER
INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The
nature of the legal proceedings against the Company is discussed at Note 9 to
this Form 10-Q report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The
Company has reported all cases instituted against it through July 4, 2009, and
the results of those cases, where terminated, to the S.E.C. on its previous Form
10-Q and 10-K reports, to which reference is hereby made.
Four
cases were formally instituted against the Company during the three months
ending October 3, 2009.
On July
20, 2009, the Company was served with a complaint captioned Gilbert v. Sturm, Ruger
& Co., Inc pending in the Boyd County Circuit Court in the
Commonwealth of Kentucky. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff
was handling a Ruger SR9 pistol when it discharged, resulting in injury to his
leg. Compensatory damages, punitive damages and costs are
demanded.
On August
18, 2009, the Company was served with a complaint captioned Steamfitters Local 449
Pension Fund, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Sturm,
Ruger & Co. Inc., et
al.
pending in the United States District Court for the District of
Connecticut. The complaint seeks unspecified damages for alleged
violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is a purported class
action on behalf of purchasers of the Company’s common stock between April 23,
2007 and October 29, 2007.
On
September 11, 2009, the Company was served with a complaint captioned Secretary of Labor v. Sturm,
Ruger & Co. Inc. pending before the Occupational Safety and Health
Review Commission. The complaint arises out of a Notice of Contest
filed by the Company pursuant to an OSHA inspection conducted at the Company’s
manufacturing facility in Newport, New Hampshire. A trial has been scheduled for
March 9, 2010.
On
September 15, 2009, the Company was served with a complaint captioned Estate of Dustin Ferebee, By
and through its Administrator, Stephanie Swanberg v. Sturm, Ruger & Co.,
Inc., et.
al. pending in the Grant County Superior Court in the State of
Washington. The complaint alleges that the decedent was in a
passenger truck and hunting with a friend when a Ruger “old model” single-action
revolver fell off the console, landed on the floor of the truck and discharged,
resulting in his death. Compensatory damages and costs are
demanded.
28
During
the three months ending October 3, 2009, no previously reported cases were
settled.
On
October 9, 2009, the Company waived service of a complaint captioned Alan R. Herrett,
Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Sturm, Ruger
& Co. Inc., et
al.
pending in the United States District Court for the District of
Connecticut. This matter is based upon the same facts and basic
allegations set forth in the Steamfitters
litigation, described above. On October 13, 2009, a motion to
consolidate the two actions was filed by counsel for the
Steamfitters.
ITEM
1A. RISK
FACTORS
There
have been no material changes in our risk factors from the information provided
in Item 1A. Risk Factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008.
ITEM
2.
|
UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
|
Not applicable
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS
UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
ITEM
5. OTHER
INFORMATION
None
29
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
|
(a)
|
Exhibits:
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32.2
|
Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
30
STURM,
RUGER & COMPANY, INC.
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 3, 2009
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
STURM,
RUGER & COMPANY, INC.
|
||
Date: October
28, 2009
|
S/THOMAS
A. DINEEN
|
|
Thomas
A. Dineen
Principal
Financial Officer,
Vice
President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer
|
31