SUIC Worldwide Holdings Ltd. - Annual Report: 2014 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014

OR

For transition period ___ to ____

Commission file number: 000-53737

AJ GREENTECH HOLDINGS LTD.

(Name of registrant in its charter)

136-20 38th Ave. Unit 3G,

Flushing, NY 11354

(Address of principal executive offices)

(718) 395-8706

(Registrant's telephone number)

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF

THE EXCHANGE ACT:

None.

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF

THE EXCHANGE ACT:

None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes☐ No☑.

Check whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes☐ No☑

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes☑ No☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes☑ No☐

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes☐ No☑.

As of June 30, 2014, the aggregate market value of the shares of the Registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates (based upon the closing price of such shares as reported on the OTC Bulletin Board) was approximately $3,763,210. (53,760,148 shares, 0.07 per share).

At December 31, 2014, there were 233,760,148 shares of the registrant's common stock issued and outstanding.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements contained in this Annual Report include “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of such term in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause actual financial or operating results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements not to occur or be realized. Forward-looking statements made in this Report generally are based on our best estimates of future results, performances or achievements, predicated upon current conditions and the most recent results of the companies involved and their respective industries. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “project,” “expect,” “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “continue,” “potential,” “opportunity” or similar terms, variations of those terms or the negative of those terms or other variations of those terms or comparable words or expressions. Potential risks and uncertainties include, among other things, such factors as:

Additional disclosures regarding factors that could cause our results and performance to differ from results or performance anticipated by this annual report are discussed in Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this annual report and our other filings with the SEC. These reports attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and prospects. The forward-looking statements made in this annual report speak only as of the date hereof and we disclaim any obligation to provide updates, revisions or amendments to any forward-looking statements to reflect changes in our expectations or future events.

PART I

We are a Nevada corporation incorporated on August 30, 2006, under the name Gateway Certifications, Inc.  On Novermber 16, 2009, our corporate name was changed to American Jianye Greentech Holdings, Ltd. and on February 13, 2014, our corporate name was changed to AJ Greentech Holdings, Ltd.

AJ Greentech Holdings Ltd. through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Jin Chih International Ltd. a corporation organized under the laws of Taiwan, The Republic of China is engaged in the business of marketing, manufacturing and distributing of green energy.

From November 2009 until October, 2013, through our China subsidiaries, we were engaged in design, marketing and distributing of alcohol base clean fuel which are designed to use less fossil fuel and have less pollution than traditional fuel.  

On October 31, 2013, pursuant to agreements with one of our former directors, we transferred the stock in our China subsidiaries to the former director in exchange for cancellation of debt totaling $240,000.  As a result of the transfer of the subsidiaries, we were no longer engaged in the China clean fuel business.  We transferred the stock of the China subsidiaries because we felt that, it not our best interest to continue China clean fuel business as a result of our decreasing revenue, continued losses and inability to raise capital for our business.

On November 1, 2013, Chu Li An and the Company entered into a loan agreement pursuant to which the Chu Li An agreed to lend us $100,000 initially with future loan amount up to $1,000,000, for which we will issue our 6% demand promissory note in the principal amount of $100,000.  As of December 31, 2014, the note has not been issued.

On November 18, 2013, we entered into agreement pursuant to which we issued to Chu Li An and her BVI company, our sole director and chief executive officer, 180,000,000 shares of common stock, in consideration of the cancellation of debt due to Chu Li An in the amount of $180,000.

On November 30, 2013, the company entered into an agreement to acquire all of the issued and outstanding stock of Jin Chih International, Ltd., a Taiwan corporation, from its sole owner Chu Li An for five million shares of the Company’s common stock. As of December 31, 2014, the stock has not been issued.

As a result of the above transactions, we carry out the electronic products and general cargo trading and related consulting service business through our subsidiary named Jin Chih International, Ltd in Taiwan. We still plan to focus on providing greentech products outside of China in future. Even though the company has disposed China branches, the company's new management will continue to expand the current green energy and technology business in the United States and globally, at the same time to explore many other green and renewable energy such as solar, wind power, sea power by signing licensing agreement or joint venture with other research institutes.

The new management is in negotiation with an established solar company to co-develop solar farm project in US, solar energy is by using Photovoltaic generating means to use the photovoltaic effect in the semiconducting material of Solar cells to straightly transfer the radiation to energy. Solar cell, the key-point, will form a large area of solar component after series connected and to collocate with power controller and inverter, finally, the photovoltaic power system formed.

By looking into the huge potential of the biomass to renewable energy, the new management is also in negotiation other US firms to co-develop biomass project in US, Biomass energy means to store solar energy in the biomass by the form of chemical energy. It could straightly or indirectly comes from photosynthesis of green plants, and could transfer into normal solid-state, liquid-state and gaseous state fuel. Biomass power is renewable energy that inexhaustible, and also the only one kind Carbon source could relive. According to the different resources, the available biomass could be divided into 5 kinds of resources: forest resources, agricultural resources, sewage and industrial organic wastewater, urban solid waste, and animal wastes. The most promising one is generated by the main fuel of straw. The calorific value of straw is equal to half of the Standard Calomel Electrode, and the average sulfur only 3/8%. So, the CO2 emission in the process during generating and will reach the carbon neutral with the CO2 inhalation during biomass renewing. That results in zero discharge that could mitigate the global warming problems, and is the potential key-point to solve it.

Employees

The Company currently has 5 full-time employees.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

You should carefully consider the risks described below before buying our common stock. If any of the risks described below actually occurs, that event could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Downturns in general economic and market conditions could materially and adversely affect our business.

The greentech industry, especially the solar and electric car market, is greatly affected by economic downturns.  The sale of our solar products is related to the quantity of new building construction and renovation. Decline in housing transactions causes less demand for solar products. In addition, our solar and electric products are mainly sold through government tender bids and installed in public areas and other public buildings will likely be materially affected by economic downturns. If these municipalities have less funds budgeted for these projects as a result of general economic conditions, sales of our solar and electric car products to government agencies will be impaired.

If we are not able to compete effectively with other competitors, our prospects for future growth will be jeopardized.

There is significant competition in the greentech industry with more established companies We are not only competing with other greentech providers but also with companies offering different kind of greentech solutions, which are usually more established and have greater resources to devote to research and development, manufacturing and marketing than we have. Our competitors may promote greentech solutions which are more readily accepted by customers than our products and maybe required to reduce the prices of our products in order to remain competitive.  Our competitors may also seek to use our financial difficulties in marketing against us.

If critical components become unavailable or contract manufacturers delay their production, our business will be negatively impacted.

Stability of component supply is crucial to determine our manufacturing process. As some critical components, such as solar panels, are supplied by certain third party component manufacturers, we may be unable to acquire necessary amounts of key components at competitive prices.  Outsourcing the production of certain parts and components is one way to reduce manufacturing costs. We have selected these particular manufacturers based on their ability to consistently produce these products according to our requirements and ensure the best quality product at the most cost effective price. Contrarily, the loss of all or one of these suppliers or delays in obtaining shipments could have an adverse effect on our operations until an alternative supplier could be found, if one may be located at all.  This may cause us to breach our contracts and lose sales.

If our contract manufacturers fail to meet our requirements for quality, quantity and timeliness, our business growth could be harmed.

We design and procure key components (such as solar panels) and outsource our products to contract manufacturers. These manufacturers procure most of the raw materials for us and provide all necessary facilities and labor to manufacture our products. If these companies are to terminate their agreements with us without adequate notice, or fail to provide the required capacity and quality on a timely basis, we would be unable to process and deliver our lighting products to our customers.

Our products could contain defects or they may be installed or operated incorrectly, which could reduce sales of those products or result in claims against us.

Although we have experienced quality control and assurance personnel and established thorough quality assurance practices to ensure good product quality, defects still may be found in the future in our existing or future products.  End-users could lose their confidence in our products and company when they unexpectedly use defective products. This could result in loss of revenue, loss of profit margin, or loss of market share. Moreover, these defects could cause us to incur significant warranty, support and repair costs, and harm our relationship with our customers.

If we are unable to recruit and retain qualified personnel, our business could be harmed.

Our growth and success highly depend on qualified personnel. So we are inevitable to make all efforts to recruit and retain skilled technical, sales, marketing, managerial, manufacturing, and administrative personnel. Competitions among the industry could cause us difficultly to recruit or retain a sufficient number of qualified technical personnel, which could harm our ability to develop new products. If we are unable to attract and retain necessary key talents, it definitely will harm our ability to develop competitive product and keep good customers and could adversely affect our business and operating results.

An increase in raw material prices could increase costs and decrease profits.

Changes in the cost of raw materials in the products we distribute could significantly increase the price of those products and affect our ability to market and distribute them. Although the cost of methanol has traditionally been relatively stable, increased use of methanol for fuel would create increased demand and could introduce volatility into the market for methanol. The market price for gasoline distillate is a function of the market price of oil, which has been highly volatile in recent years. The market price of ethanol depends primarily on the availability of feedstocks, which again has become volatile in recent years due to the heightened demand caused by the widespread acceptance of ethanol as a fuel supplement.

Increased government regulation of our production and/or marketing operations could diminish our profits.

The fuel production and supply business is highly regulated. Government authorities are concerned with effect of fuel distribution on the national and local economy. To achieve optimal availability of fuel, governments regulate many key elements of both production and distribution of fuel. Increased government regulation may affect our business in ways that cannot be predicted at this time, potentially involving price regulation, distribution regulation, and regulation of manufacturing processes. Any such regulation or a combination could have an adverse effect on our profitability. The effort to obtain the registrations, licenses and permits necessary to carry out our business activities can be daunting. Significant delays can result from the need to obtain governmental approval of our activities. These delays can have an adverse effect on the profitability of our operations. In addition, compliance with regulatory requirements applicable to fuel manufacturing and distribution may increase the cost of our operations, which would adversely affect our profitability.

Currency fluctuations may adversely affect our operating results.

Company generates revenues and incurs expenses and liabilities in foreign currency. However, it will report its financial results in the United States in U.S. Dollars. As a result, our financial results will be subject to the effects of exchange rate fluctuations between these currencies. Any events that result in a devaluation of the foreign currency versus the U.S. Dollar will have an adverse effect on our reported results. We have not entered into agreements or purchased instruments to hedge our exchange rate risks.

We are not likely to hold annual shareholder meetings in the near future.

Management does not expect to hold annual meetings of shareholders in the near future, due to the expense involved. The current members of the Board of Directors were appointed to that position by the previous directors. If other directors are added to the Board in the future, it is likely that the current directors will appoint them.

Risks Related to our Common Stock

There is a limited market for our common stock, which may make it difficult for you to sell your stock.

Our common stock trades on the OTC under the symbol “AJGH.” There is a limited trading market for our common stock and there is frequently no trading in our common stock.  As of December 31, 2014, the last reported sale price was $0.02 per share.  Accordingly, there can be no assurance as to the liquidity of any markets that may develop for our common stock, the ability of holders of our common stock to sell our common stock, or the prices at which holders may be able to sell our common stock.

Because our largest stockholder owns approximately 77.0% of our common stock, she can take actions requiring stockholder consent without the approval of other stockholders.

Our largest stockholder owns approximately 77.0% of our common stock.  Accordingly, she has the ability to elect all of our directors and to take any other action that requires stockholder approval without consulting other stockholders and without the participation of other stockholders.  As long as our common stock is not registered pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act, this stockholder can take action without notice to the other stockholders until stockholder action is reported on a Form 8-K.

We do not intend to solicit stockholder approval for any business we may engage in or acquire.

If we enter a new business or acquire a business, the decision will be made by our directors.  We presently have one director, who would make the decision on this matter. If stockholder approval is required under Nevada law in connection with any transaction, such approval may be obtained by the written consent of our largest stockholder, who owns 77.0% of our outstanding common stock.

Because our common stock is a penny stock, you may have difficulty selling them in the secondary trading market.

Federal regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 regulate the trading of “penny stock,” which are generally defined as any security not listed on a national securities exchange or Nasdaq, priced at less than $5.00 per share and offered by an issuer with limited net tangible assets and revenues. Our common stock is a penny stock and may not be traded unless a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated therewith is delivered to a potential purchaser prior to any trade.

In addition, because our common stock is a penny stock, broker-dealers may not process trades in our stock and brokers that do permit trades in our stock must take certain steps prior to selling a penny stock, which steps include:

If these penny stock rules are not followed by the broker-dealer, the purchaser has no obligation to purchase the shares. The application of these comprehensive rules will make it more difficult for broker-dealers to sell our common stock and our stockholders, therefore, may have difficulty in selling their shares in the secondary trading market, and some broker-dealers will not process purchases or sales of penny stocks.

Our stock price may be volatile and your investment in our common stock could suffer a decline in value.

As of December 31, 2014, there has only been limited trading activity in our common stock.  There can be no assurance that a market will ever develop in our common stock in the future.  If a market does not develop then stockholders would be unable to sell any of our common stock likely resulting in a complete loss of any funds they invested.

Should a market develop, the price may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include:

 Because we are not engaged in any business at the present time and do not have any agreements with respect to any prospective business, we do not know the exact nature of the risks associated with any business in which we may engage.  We cannot assure you that we will be able to adequately address these additional risks. If we were unable to do so, our operations might suffer. Additionally, if we engage in a business or acquire a company located outside of the United States, it is likely that substantially all of our assets would be located outside of the United States and some of our executive officers and directors might reside outside of the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for investors in the United States to enforce their legal rights, to effect service of process upon our directors or executive officers or to enforce judgments of United States courts predicated upon civil liabilities and criminal penalties of our directors and executive officers under Federal securities laws.

We do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

Not applicable for smaller reporting companies.

Our corporate offices are located at 3F-1, No. 200, Sec. 3, Bade Rd. Songshan Dist, Taipei, Taiwan R.O.C. 0118862-2570-7766. Our company website is AJGreentech.com

None.

Not Applicable.

PART II

Market for Our Common Stock

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing prices of our common stock. These prices reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.

Approximate Number of Holders of Our Common Stock

On December 31, 2014, there were approximately 54 stockholders of record of our common stock.

Dividend Policy

The Company has not declared or paid cash dividends or made distributions in the past, and we do not anticipate that we will pay cash dividends or make distributions in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain and reinvest future earnings, if any, to finance our operations.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None. There is no sale of unregistered securities during the fiscal year ending Dec 31, 2014.

On November 18, 2013, we issued 20,000,000 shares of common stock to two investors at a purchase price of $0.005 per share, for a total of $100,000.  The funds were used to provide us with funds for working capital purposes.   The sale of the shares was exempt from registration pursuant to Regulation S of the SEC.  The two investors, who are accredited investors, were not U.S. Persons, as defined in Rule 902.  We did not engage any broker or investment banker and we did not pay any brokers, finders’ or placement fee in connection with the sale.

Repurchase of Equity Securities.

The Company did not repurchase any of its equity securities that were registered under Section 12 of the Securities Act during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

We currently do not have any equity compensation plans.

Not applicable for smaller reporting companies.

This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These include statements about our expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies for the future, which we indicate by words or phrases such as "anticipate," "expect," "intend," "plan," "will," "we believe," "management believes" and similar language. The forward-looking statements are based on the current expectations of the Company and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those set forth in the discussion under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in this report. Actual results may differ materially from results anticipated in these forward-looking statements. We base the forward-looking statements on information currently available to us, and we assume no obligation to update them.

Investors are also advised to refer to the information in our previous filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), especially on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, in which we discuss in more detail various important factors that could cause actual results to differ from expected or historic results. It is not possible to foresee or identify all such factors. As such, investors should not consider any list of such factors to be an exhaustive statement of all risks and uncertainties or potentially inaccurate assumptions.

Overview

From November 2009 until October, 2013, through our China subsidiary, we were engaged in design, marketing and distributing of alcohol base clean fuel which are designed to use less fossil fuel and have less pollution than traditional fuel.  

On October 31, 2013, pursuant to agreements with one of our former directors, we transferred the stock in our China subsidiaries to the former director in exchange for cancellation of debt totaling $240,000.  As a result of the transfer of the subsidiaries, we were no longer engaged in the China cleanfuel business.  We transferred the stock of the China subsidiaries because we felt that, it's not our best interest to continue China cleanfuel business as a result of our decreasing revenue, continued losses and inability to raise capital for our business.

On November 30, 2013, the company entered into an agreement to acquire all of the issued and outstanding stock of Jin Chih International, Ltd., a Taiwan corporation, from its sole owner Chu Li An for five million shares of the Company’s common stock. As of December 31, 2014, the stock has not been issued.

As a result of the above transactions, we carry out the electronic products and general cargo trading and related consulting service business through our subsidiary named Jin Chih International, Ltd in Taiwan. We still plan to focus on providing greentech products outside of China in future. Even though the company has disposed China branches, the company's new management will continue to expand the current green energy and technology business in the United States and globally, at the same time to explore many other green and renewable energy such as solar, wind power, sea power by signing licensing agreement or joint venture with other research institutes.

Results of Operations

For the year ended December 31, 2014, we derived our revenues of $2,104,366 compared to $640,579 for the year ended December 31, 2013, representing an increase of $1,463,787. We acquired the Taiwan subsidiary on November 30, 2013 and spun off the China subsidiary on October 31, 2013, so our sales during the year of 2013 were from the sales $480,725 of methanol-based and ethanol based fuels to our customers operated by Chinese subsidiary during the period ended October 31, 2013 and the sales $159,854 of electronic products and general cargo trading and related consulting service to our customers operated by the Taiwan subsidiary during the December month of 2013. The difference was that, our sales during the year of 2014 were from the sales $2,104,366 of electronic products and general cargo trading and related consulting service during the total year of 2014.

Our gross profit margin during the year ended December 31, 2014 was 13%, comparing to 6.8% in last year. This figure represents our business in Chinese subsidiary before spinning off has decreased and the new business from acquisition of Taiwan subsidiary bring us marketing gross profit about 13%.

Selling, general and administrative expenses consist of provision for doubtful debts, primarily of payroll, local taxes, investor relation expenses and professional fees. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2014 were $287,781, comparing to $523,058 for the last fiscal year, representing a decrease $235,277. The decrease mainly contributed to that we spun off the China subsidiary on October 31, 2013 and acquired the Taiwan subsidiary on November 30, 2013. Accordingly, the operating expense of Taiwan subsidiary was lower than the China subsidiary as its trading business.

Our new business operates primarily in Taiwanese Dollars (“TWD”), but we report our results in our SEC filings in U.S. Dollars. The conversion of our accounts from TWD to Dollars results in translation adjustments. While our net income is added to the retained earnings on our balance sheets; the translation adjustments are added to a line item on our balance sheets labeled “accumulated other comprehensive income,” since it is more reflective of changes in the relative values of U.S. and Taiwanese currencies than of the success of our business. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the effect of converting our financial results to U.S. Dollars was to cut down $44,567 to our accumulated other comprehensive income.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our operations to date have been funded primarily by operations, due from related parties and capital contributions.

At December 31, 2014 and 2013, we had cash and cash equivalents of $198,906 and $138,738, respectively. Our cash at December 31, 2014 was increased by $60,168 from December 31, 2013.

Our current assets at December 31, 2014 were $1,927,142, compared to $2,177,352 at December 31, 2013. This decrease mainly reflects decreases in accounts receivable and partially offset by increases in the Short-term investments.

Our current liabilities at December 31, 2014 were $1,820,294, compared to $1,958,373 at December 31, 2013. This decrease mainly reflects a significant decrease of accounts payable and borrowings and partially offset by increase in due to related parties.

Statements of Cash Flows

Our cash increased $60,168 during 2014, as compared to $111,978 during 2013. In 2014, we obtained cash in the amount of $289,607 and $277,550 from operating activities and financing activities, we used cash the amounts of $523,215 in our investing activities. In 2013, we used cash the amount of $3,788 in operating activities, and we obtain cash the amount of $47,943 and $70,058 from investing activities and financing activities.

Net Cash provided by (Used in) Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities increase $293,395 from negative $3,788 in 2013 to positive $289,607 in 2014 was mainly comprised of the decrease $407,775 net loss from $480,555 in 2013 to $72,780 in 2014, depreciation and amortization increase $7,531 from $5,997 in 2013 to $13,528 in 2014, the loss on sale of PPE increase $13,793 from $2,158 in 2013 to $15,951 in 2014, the interest paid increase $40,517 from $3,583 in 2013 to $43,740 in 2014, and the decrease $175,659 from changes in operating assets and liabilities from $465,052 in 2013 to $289,393 in 2014.

Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities

In 2014, net cash used in investing activities of $523,215 comprised of the investment $519,750 of short-term investment and the investment $3,465 of other assets.

In 2013, net cash provided by investing activities of $47,943 comprised of cash used $15,469 from spinning off the Chinese subsidiary and provided $63,412 from acquisition of the Taiwan subsidiary.

Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities

In 2014, cash provided by financing activities of $277,550 consisted of the advance from related parties of $523,227, the capital contribution of $165,500, the repayment of borrowing and long debt of 367,662 the interest received $225 and interest paid of $43,740.

In 2013, cash generation in financing activities of $70,058 consisted of issuance of common stock of $100,000, the new borrowings of $284,621, the repayment of advance from related parties of $167,171, the long term debt repayment of $143,832, the interest received $23 and interest paid $3,583.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our financial statements that have been prepared under accounting principle generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

A summary of significant accounting policies is included in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report. Of these policies, we believe that the following items are the most critical in preparing our financial statements.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company follows paragraph 310-10-50-9 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company performs on-going credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and the customer’s current credit worthiness, as determined by the review of their current credit information; and determines the allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and economic conditions.

Outstanding account balances are reviewed individually for collectability. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable. Bad debt expense is included in general and administrative expenses, if any. Pursuant to paragraph 310-10-50-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The Company has adopted paragraph 310-10-50-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and determine when receivables are past due or delinquent based on how recently payments have been received.

Inventories

The Company values inventories, consisting of raw materials, packaging material and finished goods, at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on the first-in and first-out (“FIFO”) method for raw materials and packaging materials and the weighted average cost method for finished goods. Cost of finished goods comprises direct labor, direct materials, direct production cost and an allocated portion of production overhead. The Company reduces inventories for the diminution of value, resulting from product obsolescence, damage or other issues affecting marketability, equal to the difference between the cost of the inventory and its estimated market value. Factors utilized in the determination of estimated market value include (i) current sales data and historical return rates, (ii) estimates of future demand, (iii) competitive pricing pressures, (iv)new product introductions, (v) product expiration dates, and (vi) component and packaging obsolescence.

The Company evaluates its current level of inventories considering historical sales and other factors and, based on this evaluation, classify inventory markdowns in the income statement as a component of cost of goods sold pursuant to Paragraph 420-10-S99 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to adjust inventories to net realizable value. These markdowns are estimates, which could vary significantly from actual requirements if future economic conditions, customer demand or competition differ from expectations. Other significant estimates include the allocation of variable and fixed production overheads. While variable production overheads are allocated to each unit of production on the basis of actual use of production facilities, the allocation of fixed production overhead to the costs of conversion is based on the normal capacity of the Company’s production facilities, and recognizes abnormal idle facility expenses as current period charges. Certain costs, including categories of indirect materials, indirect labor and other indirect manufacturing costs which are included in the overhead pools are estimated. The management of the Company determines its normal capacity based upon the amount of operating hours of the manufacturing machinery and equipment in a reporting period.

Revenue Recognition

The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

The Company derives its revenues from sales contracts with customers with revenues being generated upon the shipment of merchandise. Persuasive evidence of an arrangement is demonstrated via sales invoice or contract; product delivery is evidenced by warehouse shipping log as well as a signed acknowledgement of receipt from the customers or a signed bill of lading from the third party trucking company and title transfers upon shipment, based on free on board (“FOB”) warehouse terms; the sales price to the customer is fixed upon acceptance of the signed purchase order or contract and there is no separate sales rebate, discount, or volume incentive. When the Company recognizes revenue, no provisions are made for returns because, historically, there have been very few sales returns and adjustments that have impacted the ultimate collection of revenues.

The Company markets and distributes electronic products and general cargo for automobile use and follows Section 605-45-45 (formerly EITF 99-19) (“ASC Section 605-45-45”) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition to report revenue gross as a principal for its sales since the Company (1) acts as principal in the transaction, (2) takes title to the products, (3) has risks and rewards of ownership, such as the risk of loss for collection, delivery, or returns, and (4) does not act as an agent or broker (including performing services, in substance, as an agent or broker) with compensation on a commission or fee basis on its sales. The management of the Company determined that the Company should report revenue based on the gross amount billed to a customer when considering each of the following eight (8) indicators of gross revenue reporting listed in ASC Paragraph 605-45-45-4 through 605-45-45-14 as specified (1) The entity is the primary obligor in the arrangement — The Company signs a product sales agreement with its customer and represents in writing that the Company is responsible for fulfillment, including the acceptability of the product(s) or service(s) ordered or purchased by the customer; (2) The entity has general inventory risk (before customer order is placed or upon customer return); (3) The entity has latitude in establishing price — The Company has reasonable latitude, within economic constraints, to establish the exchange price with a customer for the product or service; (4) The entity changes the product or performs part of the service — The Company developed a method for blending the raw materials in its manufacturing process, through its proprietary technology, catalysts can be mixed with fuel and alcohols to become a finished product to be sold after pumping and piping; (5) The entity has discretion in supplier selection — The Company has multiple suppliers for the products ordered by a customer and discretion to select the supplier that will provide the product(s) or service(s) ordered by a customer; (6) The entity is involved in the determination of product or service specifications — The Company determines the nature, type, characteristics, or specifications of the product(s) or service(s) ordered by the customer; (7) The entity has physical loss inventory risk of purchased inventories after customer order; and (8) The entity has credit risk — The Company is responsible for collecting the sales price from its customer but must pay the amount owed to its supplier after the supplier performs, regardless of whether the sales price is fully collected.

Net sales of products represent the invoiced value of goods, net of value added taxes (“VAT”). The Company is subject to VAT which is levied on all of the Company’s products at the rate of 5% on the invoiced value of sales. Sales or Output VAT is borne by customers in addition to the invoiced value of sales and Purchase or Input VAT is borne by the Company in addition to the invoiced value of purchases to the extent not refunded for export sales.

Foreign Currency Translation

The Company follows Section 830-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 830-10-45”) for foreign currency translation to translate the financial statements of the foreign subsidiary from the functional currency, generally the local currency, into U.S. Dollars. Section 830-10-45 sets out the guidance relating to how a reporting entity determines the functional currency of a foreign entity (including of a foreign entity in a highly inflationary economy), re-measures the books of record (if necessary), and characterizes transaction gains and losses. the assets, liabilities, and operations of a foreign entity shall be measured using the functional currency of that entity. An entity’s functional currency is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates; normally, that is the currency of the environment, or local currency, in which an entity primarily generates and expends cash.

The functional currency of each foreign subsidiary is determined based on management’s judgment and involves consideration of all relevant economic facts and circumstances affecting the subsidiary. Generally, the currency in which the subsidiary transacts a majority of its transactions, including billings, financing, payroll and other expenditures, would be considered the functional currency, but any dependency upon the parent and the nature of the subsidiary’s operations must also be considered. If a subsidiary’s functional currency is deemed to be the local currency, then any gain or loss associated with the translation of that subsidiary’s financial statements is included in accumulated other comprehensive income. However, if the functional currency is deemed to be the U.S. Dollar, then any gain or loss associated with the re-measurement of these financial statements from the local currency to the functional currency would be included in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (loss). If the Company disposes of foreign subsidiaries, then any cumulative translation gains or losses would be recorded into the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (loss). If the Company determines that there has been a change in the functional currency of a subsidiary to the U.S. Dollar, any translation gains or losses arising after the date of change would be included within the statement of income and comprehensive income (loss).

Based on an assessment of the factors discussed above, the management of the Company determined the relevant subsidiaries’ local currencies to be their respective functional currencies.

The financial records of the Company's Taiwan operating subsidiaries acquired on November 30, 2013 are maintained in their local currency, the “TWD”, which is also the functional currency. Assets and liabilities are translated from the local currency into the reporting currency, U.S. dollars, at the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at weighted average exchange rates for the period to approximate translation at the exchange rates prevailing at the dates those elements are recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Foreign currency translation gain (loss) resulting from the process of translating the local currency financial statements into U.S. dollars are included in determining accumulated other comprehensive income in the consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity.

Most Recent accounting pronouncements

Refer to note 2 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Impact of Most Recent Accounting Pronouncements

There were no recent accounting pronouncements that have had a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

Consolidated Financial Statements

The full text of our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2014, and 2013 begins on page F-1 of this Report.

The Company changes auditors in March 2013, September of 2013 and March 31, 2015. Please refer to 8-K dated March 7, 2013, 8-K dated September 10, 2013 and 8-K dated April 6, 2015.

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

The Company maintains a set of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls are also designed with the objective of ensuring that this information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including the Company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

During the course of internal evaluation, following control weaknesses are noted for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 that required correction:

Based upon their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, the Company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, due to the significant deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting described below, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are not effective as of December 31, 2014.

Changes in internal controls.

The term “internal control over financial reporting” (defined in SEC Rule 13a-15(f)) refers to the process of a company that is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of the year covered by this annual report, and they have concluded that there was no change to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the company in accordance with as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the (i) effectiveness and efficiency of operations, (ii) reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and (iii) compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Our internal controls framework is based on the criteria set forth in the Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

Due to inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.

A material weakness in internal controls is a deficiency in internal control, or combination of control deficiencies, that adversely affects the Company’s ability to initiate, authorize, record, process, or report external financial data reliably in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected. In the course of making our assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting, we identified some material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.

We lack sufficient personnel with the appropriate level of knowledge, experience and training in the application of accounting operations of our company. This weakness causes us to not fully identify and resolve accounting and disclosure issues that could lead to a failure to perform timely internal control and reviews.

Management is currently reviewing its staffing and systems in order to remedy the weaknesses identified in this assessment. However, because of the above condition, management’s assessment is that the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting were not effective as of December 31, 2014. Additionally, the Registrant’s management has concluded that the Registrant has a material weakness associated with its U.S. GAAP expertise.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

None.

PART III

The following table sets forth: (1) names and ages of all persons who presently are and who have been selected as directors and executive officers of the Registrant; (2) all positions and offices with the Registrant held by each such person; (3) any period during which he or she has served a such. All directors hold office until the next annual meeting of our shareholders and until their successors have been elected and qualify. Officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.

Ms. Chu, 52, served as chief executive officer of Jin Chih International Co., Ltd., a trading company from September 2001 through present 2014. From September 2008 to September 2013, Ms. Chu served as president of Wealthy Link Technology Corp. Ms. Chu received her college degree in business from Ming Chuan College in 1982, and MBA degree in Business from Angelo State University in Texas in 1987.

Nominating, Compensation and Audit Committees

The Board of Directors does not have an audit committee, a compensation committee or a nominating committee, due to the small size of the Board. The Board does also not have an “audit committee financial expert” within the definition given by the Regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Section 16(A) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Under U.S. securities laws, directors, certain executive officers and persons holding more than 10% of our common stock must report their initial ownership of the common stock, and any changes in that ownership, to the SEC.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To the best of our knowledge, none of our directors or executive officers has been convicted in a criminal proceeding, excluding traffic violations or similar misdemeanors, or has been a party to any judicial or administrative proceeding during the past five years that resulted in a judgment, decree or final order enjoining the person from future violations of, or prohibiting activities subject to, federal or state securities laws (except where not subsequently dismissed without sanction or settlement), or from engaging in any type of business practice, or a finding of any violation of federal or state securities laws. To the best of our knowledge, no petition under the federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of any of our directors or officers, or any partnership in which any of our directors or officers was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which any of our directors or officers was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing. Except as set forth in our discussion below in “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence,” none of our directors, director nominees or executive officers has been involved in any transactions with us or any of our directors, executive officers, affiliates or associates which are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.

Code of Ethics

The Board of Directors has not adopted a code of ethics applicable to the Company’s executive officers. The Board believes that the small number of individuals involved in the Company’s management makes such a code unnecessary.

Board Attendance

During 2014, the board of directors did not hold any meetings.  All actions were taken by actions in writing.

The following summary compensation table indicates the cash and non-cash compensation earned during the years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 by each person who served as chief executive officer and chief financial officer during the year ended December 31, 2014. 

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

(1)    Ms. Chu Li An has served as chief executive and financial officer since October 2013.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth for each named executive officer certain information concerning the outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2014.

Remuneration of Directors

None of the members of the Board of Directors receives remuneration for service on the Board.

Executive Employment Contracts

We have employment agreements with CEO, Chu Li An on Oct. 1, 2013 for 5 years, subject to automatic renewals of another 5 years at the rate of $30,000 per year.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Our board of directors and stockholders approved the 2013 long term incentive plan, which covers the issuance of 2,000,000 shares.  The plan provides for the grant of stock options or restricted stock grants to employees and consultants.  No shares were issued under the plan during 2014, and there are no outstanding options under the plan.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table summarizes certain information regarding the beneficial ownership (as such term is defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of outstanding Registrant Common Stock as of December 31, 2014 by (i) each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding Common Stock, (ii) each of our directors, (iii) each of our named executive officers, and (iv) all executive officers and directors as a group. Except as indicated in the footnotes below, the security and stockholders listed below possess sole voting and investment power with respect to their shares.

(1) "Beneficial Owner" means having or sharing, directly or indirectly (i) voting power, which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting, or (ii) investment power, which includes the power to dispose or to direct the disposition, of shares of the common stock of an issuer. The definition of beneficial ownership includes shares, underlying options or warrants to purchase common stock, or other securities convertible into common stock, that currently are exercisable or convertible or that will become exercisable or convertible within 60 days. Unless otherwise indicated, the beneficial owner has sole voting and investment power.

(2) For each shareholder, the calculation of percentage of beneficial ownership is based upon 233,760,148 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of December 31, 2014, and shares of Common Stock subject to options, warrants and/or conversion rights held by the shareholder that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days, which are deemed to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the shareholder holding such options, warrants, or conversion rights. The percentage ownership of any shareholder is determined by assuming that the shareholder has exercised all options, warrants and conversion rights to obtain additional securities and that no other shareholder has exercised such rights.

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

We have employment agreements with CEO, Chu Li An on Oct. 1, 2013 for 5 years, subject to automatic renewals of another 5 years at the rate of $30,000 per year.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

As of the date of this Form 10-K, the Company has not authorized any equity compensation plan, nor has our Board of Directors authorized the reservation or issuance of any securities under any equity compensation plan.

Changes in Control

There are no arrangements known to us, including any pledge by any person of our securities, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the Company.

Transactions with Related Persons

On October 31, 2013, pursuant to agreements with one of our former directors, we transferred the stock in our China subsidiaries to the former director in exchange for cancellation of debt totaling $240,000.  As a result of the transfer of the subsidiaries, we were no longer engaged in the China cleanfuel business.  We transferred the stock of the China subsidiaries because we felt that, it not our best interest to continue China cleanfuel business as a result of our decreasing revenue, continued losses and inability to raise capital for our business

On October 31, 2013, Chu Li An acquired, for nominal consideration, 8,000,000 shares of common stock from the director who acquired the subsidiaries and 12,778,399 shares of common stock from The Chairman, who was also a director.  On November 1, 2013, Chu Li An and the Company entered into a loan agreement pursuant to which the Chu Li An agreed to lend us $100,000 initially with future loan amount up to $1,000,000, for which we issued our 6% demand promissory note in the principal amount of $100,000.  The securities were issued in Chu Li An’s name.

On November 18, 2013, we entered into agreement pursuant to which we issued to Chu Li An and her BVI company, our sole director and chief executive officer, 180,000,000 shares of common stock, in consideration of the cancellation of debt due to Chu Li An in the amount of $180,000.

On April 7, 2014, the shareholder, Chu Li An contributed $165,500 capital to the Company.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the total $74,837 expense including legal, audit and general administrate expense of the Company were paid by the shareholder, Chu Li An, which were recorded as advances from related party accordingly.

Director Independence

Currently, we have no independent directors on our Board of Directors, and therefore have no formal procedures in effect for reviewing and pre-approving any transactions between us, our directors, officers and other affiliates. We will use our best efforts to insure that all transactions are on terms at least as favorable to the Company as we would negotiate with unrelated third parties.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, all audit and non-audit services performed by our auditors must be approved in advance by our Board to assure that such services do not impair the auditors’ independence from us. In accordance with its policies and procedures, our Board pre-approved the audit service performed by McCormack, Su & Company Inc. for our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014.

PART IV

(1) Filed as exhibits to the registrant’s Form SB-2 filed with the Commission on June 29, 2007.

(2) Filed as exhibits to the registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on Oct. 1, 2013.

(3) Filed as exhibits to the registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 19, 2014.

* Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

AJ Greentech Holdings, Ltd.

December 31, 2014 and 2013

Index to the consolidated financial statements

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
AJ Greentech Holdings Ltd

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of AJ Greentech Holdings Ltd. as of December 31, 2013 and the related statements of operation, changes in shareholders’ deficit and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of  AJ Greentech Holdings Ltd. as of December 31, 2013   and the results of its operation and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ Canuswa Accounting & Tax Services Inc.

Bellingham, Washington 98225

February 9, 2015

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
AJ Greentech Holdings Ltd.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AJ Greentech Holdings Ltd. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2014 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of  AJ Greentech Holdings Ltd. as of December 31, 2014 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s accumulated deficit and lack of assets raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ McCormack, Su & Company Inc

Bellingham, WA

May 22, 2015

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

AJ Greentech Holdings Ltd.

December 31, 2014

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 – Organization and Basis of presentation

Organization

AJ Greentech Holdings Ltd. is a Nevada corporation incorporated on August 30, 2006, under the name Gateway Certifications, Inc.  On November 16, 2009, our corporate name was changed to American Jianye Greentech Holdings, Ltd. and on February 13, 2014, our corporate name was changed to AJ Greentech Holdings, Ltd.

From November 2009 until October 2013, through our China subsidiaries, we were engaged in design, marketing and distributing of alcohol base clean fuel that are designed to use less fossil fuel and have less pollution than traditional fuel.  

On October 31, 2013, pursuant to agreements with one of our former directors, we transferred the stock in our China subsidiaries to the former director in exchange for cancellation of debt totaling $240,000.  As a result of the transfer of the subsidiaries, we were no longer engaged in the China cleanfuel business.  We transferred the stock of the China subsidiaries because we felt that, it not our best interest to continue China cleanfuel business as a result of our decreasing revenue, continued losses and inability to raise capital for our business

On October 31, 2013, Chu Li An acquired, for nominal consideration, 8,000,000 shares of common stock from the director who acquired the subsidiaries and 12,778,399 shares of common stock from The Chairman, who was also a director.  On November 1, 2013, Chu Li An and the Company entered into a loan agreement pursuant to which the Chu Li An agreed to lend us $100,000 initially with future loan amount up to $1,000,000, for which we will issue our 6% demand promissory note in the principal amount of $100,000.  As of December 31, 2013, the note has not been issued.

On November 18, 2013, we entered into agreement pursuant to which we issued to Chu Li An and her BVI company, our sole director and chief executive officer, 180,000,000 shares of common stock, in consideration of the cancellation of debt due to Chu Li An in the amount of $180,000.

On November 30, 2013, the company entered into an agreement to acquire all of the issued and outstanding stock of Jin Chih International, Ltd., a Taiwan corporation, from its sole owner Chu Li An for five million shares of the Company’s common stock. As of December 31, 2014, the stock has not been issued.

As a result of the above transactions, we carry out the electronic products and general cargo trading and related consulting service business through our subsidiary named Jin Chih International, Ltd in Taiwan. We still plan to focus on providing greentech products outside of China in future. Even though the company has disposed China branches, the company's new management will continue to expand the current green energy and technology business in the United States and globally, at the same time to explore many other green and renewable energy such as solar, wind power, sea power by signing licensing agreement or joint venture with other research institutes.

Basis of presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of AJ Greentech Holdings Ltd. (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”).

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Management makes these estimates using the best information available at the time the estimates are made. However, actual results could differ materially from those results.

Segment Information

ASC 280 requires companies to report information about operating segment in interim and annual financial statements. It also requires segment disclosures about products and services geographic and major customers. The Company has determined that it does not have any separately reportable operating segments.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company follows paragraph 310-10-50-9 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company performs on-going credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and the customer’s current credit worthiness, as determined by the review of their current credit information; and determines the allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and economic conditions.

Outstanding account balances are reviewed individually for collectability. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable. Bad debt expense is included in general and administrative expenses, if any. Pursuant to paragraph 310-10-50-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The Company has adopted paragraph 310-10-50-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and determine when receivables are past due or delinquent based on how recently payments have been received.

Inventories

The Company values inventories, consisting of raw materials, packaging material and finished goods, at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on the first-in and first-out (“FIFO”) method for raw materials and packaging materials and the weighted average cost method for finished goods. Cost of finished goods comprises direct labor, direct materials, direct production cost and an allocated portion of production overhead. The Company reduces inventories for the diminution of value, resulting from product obsolescence, damage or other issues affecting marketability, equal to the difference between the cost of the inventory and its estimated market value. Factors utilized in the determination of estimated market value include (i) current sales data and historical return rates, (ii) estimates of future demand, (iii) competitive pricing pressures, (iv)new product introductions, (v) product expiration dates, and (vi) component and packaging obsolescence.

The Company evaluates its current level of inventories considering historical sales and other factors and, based on this evaluation, classify inventory markdowns in the income statement as a component of cost of goods sold pursuant to Paragraph 420-10-S99 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to adjust inventories to net realizable value. These markdowns are estimates, which could vary significantly from actual requirements if future economic conditions, customer demand or competition differ from expectations. Other significant estimates include the allocation of variable and fixed production overheads. While variable production overheads are allocated to each unit of production on the basis of actual use of production facilities, the allocation of fixed production overhead to the costs of conversion is based on the normal capacity of the Company’s production facilities, and recognizes abnormal idle facility expenses as current period charges. Certain costs, including categories of indirect materials, indirect labor and other indirect manufacturing costs which are included in the overhead pools are estimated. The management of the Company determines its normal capacity based upon the amount of operating hours of the manufacturing machinery and equipment in a reporting period.

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s revenue recognition policies are in compliance with ASC 605 (Originally issued as Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 104). Revenue is recognized at the date of shipment to customers when a formal arrangement exists, the price is fixed or determinable, the delivery is completed, no other significant obligations of the Company exist and collectability is reasonably assured. Payments received before all of the relevant criteria for revenue recognition are satisfied are recorded as unearned revenue.   Discounts provided to customers by the Company at the time of sale are recognized as a reduction in sales as the products are sold. Sales taxes are not recorded as a component of sales.

The Company derives its revenues from sales contracts with customers with revenues being generated upon the shipment of merchandise. Persuasive evidence of an arrangement is demonstrated via sales invoice or contract; product delivery is evidenced by warehouse shipping log as well as a signed acknowledgement of receipt from the customers or a signed bill of lading from the third party trucking company and title transfers upon shipment, based on free on board (“FOB”) warehouse terms; the sales price to the customer is fixed upon acceptance of the signed purchase order or contract and there is no separate sales rebate, discount, or volume incentive. When the Company recognizes revenue, no provisions are made for returns because, historically, there have been very few sales returns and adjustments that have impacted the ultimate collection of revenues.

The Company markets and distributes electronic products and general cargo for automobile use and follows Section 605-45-45 (formerly EITF 99-19) (“ASC Section 605-45-45”) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition to report revenue gross as a principal for its sales since the Company (1) acts as principal in the transaction, (2) takes title to the products, (3) has risks and rewards of ownership, such as the risk of loss for collection, delivery, or returns, and (4) does not act as an agent or broker (including performing services, in substance, as an agent or broker) with compensation on a commission or fee basis on its sales. The management of the Company determined that the Company should report revenue based on the gross amount billed to a customer when considering each of the following eight (8) indicators of gross revenue reporting listed in ASC Paragraph 605-45-45-4 through 605-45-45-14 as specified (1) The entity is the primary obligor in the arrangement — The Company signs a product sales agreement with its customer and represents in writing that the Company is responsible for fulfillment, including the acceptability of the product(s) or service(s) ordered or purchased by the customer; (2) The entity has general inventory risk (before customer order is placed or upon customer return); (3) The entity has latitude in establishing price — The Company has reasonable latitude, within economic constraints, to establish the exchange price with a customer for the product or service; (4) The entity changes the product or performs part of the service — The Company developed a method for blending the raw materials in its manufacturing process, through its proprietary technology, catalysts can be mixed with fuel and alcohols to become a finished product to be sold after pumping and piping; (5) The entity has discretion in supplier selection — The Company has multiple suppliers for the products ordered by a customer and discretion to select the supplier that will provide the product(s) or service(s) ordered by a customer; (6) The entity is involved in the determination of product or service specifications — The Company determines the nature, type, characteristics, or specifications of the product(s) or service(s) ordered by the customer; (7) The entity has physical loss inventory risk of purchased inventories after customer order; and (8) The entity has credit risk — The Company is responsible for collecting the sales price from its customer but must pay the amount owed to its supplier after the supplier performs, regardless of whether the sales price is fully collected.

Net sales of products represent the invoiced value of goods, net of value added taxes (“VAT”). The Company is subject to VAT which is levied on all of the Company’s products at the rate of 5% on the invoiced value of sales. Sales or Output VAT is borne by customers in addition to the invoiced value of sales and Purchase or Input VAT is borne by the Company in addition to the invoiced value of purchases to the extent not refunded for export sales.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair values of the Company’s accrued expenses and other current liabilities approximate their carrying values due to the relatively short maturities of these instruments. The carrying value of the Company’s short and long term debt approximates fair value based on management’s best estimate of the interest rates that would be available for similar debt obligations having similar terms at the balance sheet date.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company accounts for the impairment and disposition of long-lived assets in accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment. The Company periodically evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. If the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) from the use of an asset were less than the carrying value, a write-down would be recorded to reduce the related asset to its estimated fair value.

The assumptions used by management in determining the future cash flows are critical. In the event these expected cash flows are not realized, future impairment losses may be recorded.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes, which requires that the Company recognize deferred tax liabilities and assets based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect in the years the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred income tax benefit (expense) results from the change in net deferred tax assets or deferred tax liabilities. A valuation allowance is recorded when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some or all of any deferred tax assets will not be realized.

The Company adopted ASC 740-10-25, Income Taxes- Overall-Recognition, on January 1, 2007, which provides criteria for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax position. The Company must recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution. The Company did not recognize any additional liabilities for uncertain tax positions as a result of the implementation of ASC 740-10-25.

Net Loss per Share

The Company calculates its basic and diluted earnings per share in accordance with ASC 260. Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share are calculated by adjusting the weighted average outstanding shares to assume conversion of all potentially dilutive warrants and options and convertible securities. Because the Company incurred losses for the year ended December 31, 2014, the number of basic and diluted shares of common stock is the same since any effect from outstanding warrants would be anti-dilutive.

Translation Adjustment

The Company’s financial statements are presented in the U.S. dollar ($), which is the Company’s reporting and functional currency. The functional currency of the Company’s subsidiaries is TWD. Transactions in foreign currencies are initially recorded at the functional currency rate prevailing at the date of transaction. Any differences between the initially recorded amount and the settlement amount are recorded as a gain or loss on foreign currency transaction in the consolidated statements of operations. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency are translated at the functional currency rate of exchange prevailing at the balance sheet date. Any differences are taken to profit or loss as a gain or loss on foreign currency translation in the statements of operations.

In accordance with ASC 830, Foreign Currency Matters, the Company translates the assets and liabilities into U.S. dollars using the rate of exchange prevailing at the balance sheet date and the statements of operations and cash flows are translated at an average rate during the reporting period. Adjustments resulting from the translation from TWD into U.S. dollar are recorded in stockholders’ equity as part of accumulated other comprehensive income. The exchange rates used for the financial statements in accordance with ASC 830, Foreign Currency Matters, are as follows:

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) includes accumulated foreign currency translation gains and losses with respect to the spun-off entities and the operating entity in Taiwan.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”).

This guidance amends the existing FASB Accounting Standards Codification, creating a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customer. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps:

1. Identify the contract(s) with the customer
2. Identify the performance obligations in the contract
3. Determine the transaction price
4. Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract
5. Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligations

The ASU also provides guidance on disclosures that should be provided to enable financial statement users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue recognition and cash flows arising from contracts with customers.  Qualitative and quantitative information is required about the following:

1. Contracts with customers – including revenue and impairments recognized, disaggregation of revenue, and information about contract balances and performance obligations (including the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations)
2. Significant judgments and changes in judgments – determining the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations (over time or at a point in time), and determining the transaction price and amounts allocated to performance obligations
3. Assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract.

ASU 2014-09 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period for all public entities.  Early application is not permitted.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation.

The amendments in this Update remove the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the Accounting Standards Codification, thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage.

The amendments also clarify that the guidance in Topic 275, Risks and Uncertainties, is applicable to entities that have not commenced planned principal operations.

Finally, the amendments remove paragraph 810-10-15-16. Paragraph 810-10-15-16 states that a development stage entity does not meet the condition in paragraph 810-10-15-14(a) to be a variable interest entity if (1) the entity can demonstrate that the equity invested in the legal entity is sufficient to permit it to finance the activities that it is currently engaged in and (2) the entity’s governing documents and contractual arrangements allow additional equity investments.

The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage.

The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public business entities, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein.

Early application of each of the amendments is permitted for any annual reporting period or interim period for which the entity’s financial statements have not yet been issued (public business entities) or made available for issuance (other entities). Upon adoption, entities will no longer present or disclose any information required by Topic 915.

In June 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-12 “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period” (“ASU 2014-12”).

The amendments clarify the proper method of accounting for share-based payments when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period.  The Update requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. The performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered.

The amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted.

In August 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”).

In connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, an entity’s management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Management’s evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued (or at the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The term probable is used consistently with its use in Topic 450, Contingencies.

When management identifies conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, management should consider whether its plans that are intended to mitigate those relevant conditions or events will alleviate the substantial doubt. The mitigating effect of management’s plans should be considered only to the extent that (1) it is probable that the plans will be effectively implemented and, if so, (2) it is probable that the plans will mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, but the substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following (or refer to similar information disclosed elsewhere in the footnotes):

If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and substantial doubt is not alleviated after consideration of management’s plans, an entity should include a statement in the footnotes indicating that there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). Additionally, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following:

The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.

Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, when adopted, will have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

Note 3 – Going Concern

There are no assurances that the Company will be able to either (1) achieve a level of revenues adequate to generate sufficient cash flow from operations; or (2) obtain additional financing through either private placement, public offerings and/or bank financing necessary to support the Company’s working capital requirements. To the extent that funds generated from any private placements, public offering and/or bank financing are insufficient to support the Company’s working capital requirements, the Company will have to raise additional working capital from additional financing. No assurance can be given that additional financing will be available, or if available, will be on terms acceptable to the Company. If adequate working capital is not available, the Company may not be able continue its operations.

These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 4 – Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable at December 31, 2014 and 2013 consisted of the following:

Note 5 – Short term investment

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company purchased 1,600,000 shares per $0.315 issued by GaoPing XiNeng electric power Co., Ltd and 50,000 shares per $0.315 issued by YangXin commercial bank Co., Ltd.

Note 6 – Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment, stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation at December 31, 2014 and 2013 consisted of the following:

For the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company recorded depreciation expense of $9,163 and $5,997, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company disposed the office equipments and record net loss $15,951.

Note 7 – Prepayments and other current assets

Note 8 – Borrowing

The long term debt should be repaid as equal principal by month. The long term debt -the term less than 1 year represented the amount should be repaid within 1 year.

NOTE 9 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The total amount advance from related parties consisted of the advance from shareholders for the investment, working capital and the expense. The balance was $583,227 and $60,000 as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company borrowed $448,390 from shareholder, Chu Li An.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the total $74,837 expense including legal, audit and general administrate expense of the Company were paid by the shareholder, Chu Li An, which were recorded as advances from related party accordingly.

NOTE 10 – LONG TERM DEBT

The long term debt should be repaid as equal principal by month. The long term debt -the term less than 1 year represented the amount should be repaid within 1 year.

NOTE 11 – COMMON STOCK

On April 7, 2014, the shareholder, Chu Li An contributed $165,500 capital to the Company.

The Company’s capitalization is 394,500,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001 per share. There are a total of 233,760,148 common shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2014. No preferred shares have been authorized or issued.

NOTE 12 – INCOME TAX

The Company did not provide any current or deferred U.S. federal income tax provision or benefit for any of the periods presented because the Company has experienced operating losses for U.S. federal income tax purposes since inception. When it is more likely than not that a tax asset cannot be realized through future income the Company must allow for this future tax benefit.  The operating subsidiary is organized and located in the TaiWan and does not conduct any business in the United States.

Taxation on profits earned in the TaiWan has been calculated on the estimated assessable profits for the year at the rates of taxation prevailing in the TaiWan where the Company operates after taking into account the benefits from any special tax credits or “tax holidays” allowed in the county of operations.

In accordance with the relevant tax laws in the TaiWan, the Company statutory rate were 17% and 17% for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The income tax expense were $421 and nil for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

NOTE 13 – FOREIGN OPERATIONS

Operations

Substantially all of the Company’s operations are carried out and all of its assets are located in the TaiWan. Accordingly, the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations may be influenced by the political, economic and legal environments in the TaiWan. The Company’s business may be influenced by changes in governmental policies with respect to laws and regulations, monetary policies, anti-inflationary measures, currency fluctuation and remittances and methods of taxation, among other things.

Dividends and Reserves

Under the laws of the TaiWan, net income after taxation can only be distributed as dividends after appropriation has been made for the following: (i) cumulative prior years’ losses, if any; (ii) allocations to the “Statutory Surplus Reserve” of at least 10% of net income after tax, as determined under TaiWan accounting rules and regulations, until the fund amounts to 50% of the Company’s registered capital; (iii) allocations of 5-10% of income after tax, as determined under PRC accounting rules and regulations, to the Company’s “Statutory Common Welfare Fund”, which is established for the purpose of providing employee facilities and other collective benefits to employees in PRC; and (iv) allocations to any discretionary surplus reserve, if approved by stockholders.

As of December 31, 2014, the Company had no Statutory Surplus Reserve and the Statutory Common Welfare Fund established and segregated in retained earnings.

NOTE 14 –SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has performed an evaluation of subsequent events in accordance with ASC Topic 855 and the Company is not aware of any other subsequent events which would require recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.

F-16