SUMMER ENERGY HOLDINGS INC - Annual Report: 2009 (Form 10-K)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
Form
10-K
(Mark
One)
[ X ]
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the
fiscal year ended DECEMBER
31, 2009
[ ] TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
transition period from _________________________ to
______________________________
Commission
File Number 333-144620
CASTWELL PRECAST
CORPORATION
|
|
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in charter)
|
|
NEVADA
|
20-2722022
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
5641 South Magic Drive, Murray,
Utah
|
84107
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(801) 599-5443
|
|
(Issuer’s
telephone number, including area code)
|
|
Securities
registered under Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities
registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes ¨ No x
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes ¨ No x
Note – Checking the box above
will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those
Sections.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). The registrant has not yet
been phased into the Interactive Data reporting system.
Yes ¨ No
¨
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K (22.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K
x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
(Do
not check if a smaller
|
Smaller
reporting company x
|
reporting
company)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the issuer is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No
x
State the
aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by
non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was
sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last
business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal
quarter.
As of June 30, 2009, based on the
$0.15 price at which the common equity was sold in the registrant’s registered
offering in 2008, the aggregate market value of the 1,122,070 shares held by
non-affiliates was approximately $168,300.
APPLICABLE
ONLY TO REGISTRANTS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS
DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section
12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of
securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yes ¨ No
¨
(APPLICABLE
ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS)
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
As
of March 19, 2010, there were 3,808,348 shares of the issuer’s common stock
outstanding.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
List
hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the part of
the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is
incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any
proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule
424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents
should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to
security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).
None.
2
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This
report contains forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements reflect the Company’s
views with respect to future events based upon information available to it at
this time. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain
uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from these statements. These uncertainties and other
factors include, but are not limited to, the risk factors
described herein under the caption “Risk Factors.” The words
“anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” “projects,”
“targets” and similar expressions identify forward-looking
statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement
was made. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or
revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
changes in assumptions, future events or otherwise.
Part
I
Item
1. Business
General
We were
incorporated under the laws of Nevada on March 25, 2005. On April 4,
2008, we completed the sale of 1,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to a
registration statement on Form SB-2 from which we received gross proceeds of
$150,000 before deducting the costs of the offering. We conduct our operations
through our wholly owned subsidiary, Castwell Precast, Inc., a Utah corporation,
that was also incorporated in March 2005. Unless otherwise indicated,
Castwell Precast Corporation and Castwell Precast, Inc. are collectively
referred to throughout this report as “we”, “us” or the “Company.”
We are
engaged in the business of manufacturing and installing decorative window wells
made from precast concrete. Our window wells are molded on the
interior side to resemble a natural stone pattern that is more pleasing to the
eye than the typical corrugated metal or fiberglass product. In
addition, we believe the strength and durability of concrete make our window
wells superior to those manufactured from galvanized steel, aluminum, fiberglass
or similar materials which may buckle, shift or break over time and, in the case
of composite and fiberglass, are subject to warping or fading as a result of
prolonged exposure to sunlight. Our window wells are designed for
long-term use and are bolted to the foundation of the home at the time of
installation to prevent future settling or movement. Our window wells
are available in natural concrete which provides a neutral background and
increases the amount of light reflected into the basement as well as a variety
of colors that will match the window well to a desired color scheme and provide
additional contrast to accentuate the illusion of real
stone. We also offer ladders and covers that have been custom
made to fit our line of window wells.
The
Industry
Window
wells are structures that are placed around basement windows to protect them
from caving earth and soil build-up. Window wells are also designed
to provide light and ventilation to the basement area and, in some cases, to
provide an exit from the basement in the event of an emergency. In
order to be effective, we believe window wells should extend from several inches
below the sill of the basement window to a height that is approximately 4 to 6
inches above grade level. Window wells range in size from small wells
whose function is solely to protect a smaller size basement window to large
wells designed to provide egress to the outdoors in the event of an
emergency. Window wells are governed by local building codes which
generally require at least one means of emergency escape from a basement
location. Window wells designed to serve as escape or rescue windows
must meet the minimum requirements for length, width and accessibility and must
be equipped with a ladder or steps if they exceed a certain height. All of our
window wells meet the minimum size required for an egress window well in
accordance with Salt Lake County, Utah regulations.
3
Our
Products
All of
our window wells are made of precast concrete with the interior side molded to
resemble natural stone. We manufacture window wells in the following
five standard sizes: 6 feet wide, 5.5 feet tall; 5 feet wide, 5.5 feet tall; 5
feet wide, 4.5 feet tall; 4 feet wide, 5.5 feet tall; and 3 feet wide, 5 feet
tall. Our window wells have built in bolts for attaching
them to the foundation and built in forklift ports to facilitate moving and
loading the products. Our window wells can be ordered in natural
concrete tones or a variety of colors that are produced by adding stains to the
concrete before it is poured. Our window wells range in price from
approximately $400 to $500 each and we typically include installation if the
purchaser buys three or more window wells for simultaneous
delivery. We also offer custom steel ladders ranging in price from
approximately $85 to $105 based on the type of paint finish, and window well
covers ranging in price from approximately $230 to $270 based on paint
finish. Covers are generally required by building codes for window
wells located within three feet of a walking area and ladders are required for
window wells with a depth greater than 3 feet.
Manufacturing
During
2007, we manufactured all of our window wells at our manufacturing and warehouse
facility in Murray, Utah. On February 1, 2008, we relocated our
manufacturing operations to a manufacturing and warehouse facility owned by our
vice president and located at 11744 South 2700 West, Riverton,
Utah. We currently use five molds to manufacture window wells in five
different dimensions. Each mold is constructed of two pieces of heavy
steel which are pinned together to permit pouring of the concrete and are
separated when the concrete has hardened so the finished window wells can be
removed. One side of the mold is lined with a sculptured rubber mat
that creates the appearance of natural stone on that side of the
mold. The manufacturing process is a simple one that involves
assembling the molds, placing wire mesh, steel and the attaching bolts in the
molds, filling the molds with concrete, and disassembling the molds after the
concrete has hardened. We purchase our concrete from third party
cement plants who deliver the concrete in cement trucks capable of pouring it
directly into our molds. We purchase the wire mesh, steel and
bolt components from local suppliers and believe all of such supplies are
readily available from a variety of sources. Once the window wells
have been removed from the molds, they are moved and stacked by forklift to
await delivery. Since we work a maximum of one shift per day, we
cannot pour cement more than once per day and our current capacity is limited to
a maximum of five window wells per day or twenty-five per week.
Installation
Our
window wells are loaded onto a trailer with a forklift and transported to the
job site. At the job site, the window wells are off-loaded from the
truck and moved into position outside each window with the use of a freestanding
crane or boom truck with a crane mounted on the truck bed. Once
placed in position, the window wells are bolted to the foundation and soil is
backfilled around the exterior side of the window well. The interior
can then be partially filled with gravel and soil or decorative rock if
desired. It is the responsibility of the contractor or homeowner to
prepare the site for installation of the window well. The area around
the window well must be excavated to the required dimensions and must have a
compacted and level base at the prescribed depth below the
windowsill. In the typical case, installation takes approximately
fifteen to twenty minutes per window well. We currently use our
trailer to deliver a maximum of four window wells to a job site and rent a crane
or boom truck to install our window wells at the site for a cost of
approximately $80 per hour with a two-hour minimum charge.
Marketing
and Sales
We
typically sell our window wells to smaller homebuilders building specialty homes
in the Salt Lake City Metropolitan Area who are willing to pay more for the
decorative look and durability of our window wells as compared to the
conventional corrugated steel, aluminum or fiberglass models. We
don’t employ any salesman or marketing personnel and generally sell our window
wells by word of mouth and by “cold calls” to residential
contractors. We also pay an 8% to 15% sales commission to one
independent window well salesman for selling our window wells to residential
contractors. We previously attempted to develop a relationship with
larger home builders and developers for the installation of all window wells in
a large-scale residential development but found that most large scale
developments are budgeted to use cheaper galvanized window wells and are not
willing to pay more for our products. We offer price discounts on our
products based on the volume purchased. The market for our products
varies with the level of construction in the area and is typically slowest
during periods of bad weather and below freezing temperatures.
4
Competition
We
compete with a variety of window well manufacturers including manufacturers of
the low end, traditional corrugated steel, aluminum or fiberglass models, larger
manufacturers of precast concrete models and national manufacturers selling
large pre-built systems designed to provide easy emergency ingress and egress to
a home. We believe our primary local competitor is O Well and that
our national competitors include ScapeWel, Wilbert Precast, Inc., Mar-flex
Landscapes and others, although we believe shipping costs make it difficult for
out-of-state manufacturers to compete on the basis of price. All of
our competitors are better established and have more experience and financial
and human resources than do we and there is no assurance that we will be able to
compete effectively in our chosen market.
Regulation
We are
regulated by local building authorities that issue building permits for the
construction of new dwellings and the renovation of existing
dwellings. We are also subject to federal and state laws applicable
to environmental hazards and hazardous wastes in connection with our
manufacturing operations. Applicable environmental laws generally
require us to place liners in any dumpsters used to dispose of waste concrete
and to dispose of such concrete at a concrete recycling facility. At
the present time, the cost of complying with such environmental laws is not
significant and environmental laws and regulations do not have a material effect
on our business or financial condition.
Employees
and Consultants
Our
officers are our only employees and we are dependent on their continued service
to operate our business. The loss of our officers, particularly our
president/treasurer, would have a material adverse impact on our business and
there is no assurance that we could locate qualified replacements. We
have not entered into employment agreements with our officers and we do not
carry “key man” life insurance on their lives.
Facilities
Our
offices are located at the residence of our president and treasurer at 5641
South Magic Drive, Murray, Utah 84107, which space is provided to us without
charge. Our manufacturing operations are located in a manufacturing
and warehouse facility owned by our vice president and located at 11744 South
2700 West, Riverton, Utah. We use approximately one-third of the
facility on a shared basis pursuant to an oral, month-to-month
arrangement. We believe these facilities will be adequate for the
operation of our business for at least the next twelve
months.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
|
Risk
Factors
Our
business involves significant risks. You are cautioned not to make an
investment in our Shares unless you can afford to lose your entire
investment. You should carefully consider the following risk factors
and the other information included in this report before you decide to buy our
Shares.
Our
financial statements contain a going concern qualification indicating that we do
not have the necessary working capital for our planned activity which raises
doubts about our ability to continue as a going concern.
Our
annual audited financial statements contain a going concern qualification
indicating that we do not have the necessary working capital for our planned
activity and stating that this raises doubts about our ability to continue as a
going concern. We incurred a net operating loss of $56,278 and
$98,661 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and we had an accumulated
deficit of $276,021as of December 31, 2009. In March 2010, we
sold 170,000
shares of our common stock in two private transactions for $25,500 to
provide the Company with additional working capital. Except
for the foregoing, we have not entered into any agreements or arrangements for
the provision of additional debt or equity financing and there can be no
assurance that we will be able to obtain the additional debt or equity capital
required in order to continue our operations.
5
We
were incorporated in March 2005, have a history of operating losses and there
can be no assurance that we will be able to operate at a profit in the
future.
We were
incorporated on March 25, 2005. We incurred a net loss of $61,209 for
the approximately nine months ended December 31, 2005, a net loss of $8,700 for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, a net loss of $51,173 for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2007, a net loss of $98,661 for the year ended December
31, 2008 and a net loss of $56,278 for the year ended December 31,
2009. There can be no assurance that we will be able to operate at a
profit in the future.
Our
operations are subject to various risks including, but not limited to, the
continuation of the housing crisis and the related decrease in new residential
construction which has already substantially reduced the demand for our products
and has had a material adverse effect on our business and financial
condition.
Our
success will depend on our ability to grow our operations so that our revenues
can begin to exceed our costs of operation. Our operations are subject to
various risks including, but not limited to, the continuation of the housing
crisis and the related decrease in new residential construction which has
already substantially reduced the demand for our products and has had a material
adverse effect on our business and financial condition. If the
housing crisis continues, it could further reduce the demand for our products
and have a further material adverse effect on our business and financial
condition.
We
depend on our officers and the loss of their services would have an adverse
effect on our business.
We are
dependent on our officers, particularly our president and treasurer, Jason T.
Haislip, to operate our business and the loss of any of such persons would have
an adverse impact on our operations until such time as they could be replaced,
if they could be replaced. We do not have employment agreements with
our officers and we do not carry key man life insurance on their
lives. (See “Management.”)
There
is currently no established trading market for our stock and there is no
assurance that any market will develop in the future, which means a purchaser of
our shares may not be able to resell the shares in the future.
Although
our stock is included for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board, there is
currently no active trading market for the Company's stock, and there can be no
assurance that an active or liquid trading market for the Company's stock will
develop in the future. As a result, the acquisition of our common
stock must be considered an “illiquid” investment and a purchaser may not be
able to resell the shares in the future. (See “Item 5. Market for
Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities.”)
Our
stock is subject to special sales practice requirements that could have an
adverse impact on any trading market that may develop for our
stock.
Our stock
is subject to special sales practice requirements applicable to “penny stocks”
which are imposed on broker-dealers who sell low-priced securities of this
type. These rules may be anticipated to affect the ability of
broker-dealers to sell our stock, which may in turn be anticipated to have an
adverse impact on the market price for our stock if and when a trading market
should develop. (See “Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity,
Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities.”)
Our
officers and directors own a majority of our issued and outstanding shares and
other stockholders have little or no ability to elect directors or
influence corporate matters
As of
March 18, 2010, our officers and directors were the beneficial owners of
approximately 56.5% of our issued and outstanding shares of common
stock. Such persons will able to determine the outcome of actions
taken by us that require stockholder approval. For example, they will be able to
elect all of our directors and control the policies and practices of the
Company. (See “Principal Stockholders.”)
6
All
shares previously sold by us without registration are currently eligible for
sale under Rule 144, which may have an adverse impact on any trading market that
may develop for our common stock.
All of
the 2,808,348 issued and outstanding shares of our common stock that were issued
without registration were issued more than two years ago and are currently
eligible for sale pursuant to Rule 144 adopted under the Securities
Act. As a result, non-affiliates are able to sell their shares in any
market for our common stock without limitation. For stockholders who
are “affiliates” of the Company, which generally includes officers, directors
and 10% or greater stockholders, Rule 144 generally requires that they not make
any sales unless the Company is current in the filing of periodic reports with
the SEC, that they file notices on Form 144 with respect to such sales, and that
their public sales of restricted securities do not exceed the greater of 1% of
the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock or 1% of the average
trading volume on a national exchange during the preceding four
weeks. The possibility of sales under Rule 144 may, in the
future, have a depressive effect on the price of the Company’s securities in any
market which may develop. The 2,150,000 shares of the Company’s
common stock held by Amie Coleman and Jason T. Haislip are also subject to the
requirements of a Promotional Shares Lock-In Agreement with the Company and such
persons are required to sell their shares in accordance with the requirements of
such agreement until such time as it has terminated. (See “Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions: Promotional Shares Lock-In
Agreement.”)
Item
2. Properties.
Our
offices are located at the residence of our president and treasurer at 5641
South Magic Drive, Murray, Utah 84107, which space is provided to us without
charge. Our manufacturing operations are located in a manufacturing
and warehouse facility owned by our vice president and located at 11744 South
2700 West, Riverton, Utah. We use approximately one-third of the
facility on a shared basis pursuant to an oral, month-to-month
arrangement. We originally paid rent for such facility in the amount
of $500 per month plus our share of utilities, however the rent was subsequently
reduced to $400 per month. The landlord has forgiven the rent for
certain months during 2008 and 2009 as a result of the downturn in our
business. We believe these facilities will be adequate for the
operation of our business for at least the next twelve
months.
Item
3. Legal Proceedings.
The
Company is not a party to any material legal proceedings and, to our knowledge,
no such legal proceedings have been threatened against us.
Part
II
Item
5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market
Information
In
December, 2008, the Company's common stock became included on the OTC Bulletin
Board under the symbol "CPXE." However, there currently is no active
trading market for the Company's stock. There can be no assurance
that an active or liquid trading market for the Company's stock will develop in
the future.
On March
24, 2010, there were no published bid or asked quotations for the Company’s
common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board.
At March
24, 2010, there were approximately 67 holders of record of the Company's common
stock, as reported by the Company's transfer agent. In computing the
number of holders of record, each broker-dealer and clearing corporation holding
shares on behalf of its customers is counted as a single
stockholder.
No
dividends have ever been paid on the Company's securities, and the Company has
no current plans to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.
7
Special
Sales Practice Requirements with Regard to “Penny Stocks”
In order
to protect investors from patterns of fraud and abuse that have occurred in the
market for low priced securities commonly referred to as “penny stocks,” the SEC
has adopted regulations that generally define a “penny stock” to be any equity
security having a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share, or an
exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain
exceptions. Since the price of our stock is well below $5.00 per
share, our stock is subject to the “penny stock” regulations. As a
result, broker-dealers selling our common stock are subject to additional sales
practices when they sell our stock to persons other than established clients and
“accredited investors.” For transactions covered by these rules,
before the transaction is executed, the broker-dealer must make a special
customer suitability determination, receive the purchaser’s written consent to
the transaction and deliver a risk disclosure document relating to the penny
stock market. The broker-dealer must
also disclose the commission payable to both
the broker-dealer and the registered representative taking the order, current
quotations for the securities and, if applicable, the fact
that the broker-dealer is the sole market maker and the broker-dealer’s presumed
control over the market. Monthly statements must be sent disclosing
recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information
on the limited market in penny stocks. Such “penny stock” rules may
restrict trading in our common stock and may deter broker-dealers from effecting
transactions in our common stock.
Equity
Compensation Plans
We do not
have in effect any compensation plans under which our equity securities are
authorized for issuance and we do not have any outstanding employee stock
options.
Transfer
Agent
Colonial
Stock Transfer Co., Inc., 66 Exchange Place, Suite 100, Salt Lake City, Utah
84111, telephone (801) 355-5740, serves as the transfer agent and registrar for
our common stock.
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities
We did
not sell any unregistered securities during our 2009 fiscal year.
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
We have
not adopted a stock repurchase plan and we did not purchase any shares of our
equity securities during the 2009 fiscal year.
Item
6. Selected Financial Data
Because
the Company is a Smaller Reporting Company, it is not required to respond to
this Item.
Item
7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
You
should read the following discussion in conjunction with our financial
statements, which are included elsewhere in this report. The
following information contains forward-looking statements. (See “Forward Looking
Statements” and “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”)
General
We were
incorporated on March 25, 2005 to engage in the business of manufacturing and
installing precast concrete window wells. On April 4, 2008, we
completed the sale of 1,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to a
registration statement on Form SB-2 from which we received gross proceeds of
$150,000 before deducting the costs of the offering. Although we have
not yet operated on a profitable basis, the proceeds received from such offering
were sufficient to sustain our operations through December 31,
2009. In March 2010, we sold 170,000 shares of our common stock
in two private transactions for $25,500 to provide the Company with
additional working capital.
8
Our
executive offices are located at the residence of our president and treasurer
for which we pay no rent. Our manufacturing operations are located in
a manufacturing and warehouse facility owned by our vice president and located
at 11744 South 2700 West, Riverton, Utah. We use approximately
one-third of the facility on a shared basis pursuant to an oral, month-to-month
arrangement. We originally paid rent for such facility in the amount
of $500 per month plus our share of utilities, however the rent was subsequently
reduced to $400 per month. The landlord has forgiven the rent for
certain months during 2008 and 2009 as a result of the downturn in our
business. We believe these facilities will be adequate for the
operation of our business for at least the next twelve
months.
Our
operations involve the manufacture, sale and installation of decorative pre-cast
concrete window wells. Substantially all of such work is performed by
our officers with limited marketing assistance from an independent
contractor. To date, we have not operated on a profitable
basis.
2009
Fiscal Year Compared to 2008 Fiscal Year
As
discussed below, the housing crisis and the related drop in new residential
construction have substantially reduced the demand for our products and have had
a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. If
the housing crisis continues, it could further reduce our revenues, increase our
losses and force us to either obtain additional debt or equity capital or to
cease operations. In March 2010, we sold 170,000
shares of our common stock in two private transactions for $25,500 to provide
the Company with additional working capital. Except for the
foregoing, we have not entered into any agreement or arrangement for the
provision of additional debt or equity funding and no assurance can be given
that such funding would be available to us on acceptable terms or at
all.
During
the year ended December 31, 2009, our revenues were $2,620 compared to revenues
of $25,316 for the year ended December 31, 2008, a decrease of $22,696 or
89.7%. We believe the decrease is primarily attributable to
significantly reduced product sales during 2009 as result of the housing crisis
and the precipitous decrease in the construction of new homes. During
2009, our gross loss was $687compared to a gross profit for the 2008 of
$5,220. The decrease results from the significantly decreased
revenues described above.
During
the year ended December 31, 2009, our total operating expenses were $55,591,
which was significantly lower than our operating expenses of $103,881 for the
year ended December 31, 2008. The $48,290 decrease in operating
expenses from 2008 to 2009 is primarily attributable to reductions in payroll
($26,830), office expenses ($6,609), automobile ($4,128), rent ($3,370) and
insurance ($2,693).
During
the year ended December 31, 2009, our net loss was $56,278 compared to a net
loss of $98,661 for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in
net loss from 2008 to 2009 was primarily attributable to the $5,907 reduction in
gross profit discussed above which was more than offset by the $48,290 reduction
in total operating expenses.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
On a
consolidated basis, as of December 31, 2009, we had current assets in the form
of cash in the amount of $1,362 and current liabilities of $3,942, which
resulted in a working capital deficit of $2,580. As of December 31,
2008, we had cash and receivables in the amount of $43,174 and current
liabilities of $1,500, which resulted in working capital of
$41,674. The decrease in working capital from December 31, 2008 to
December 31, 2009 is the result of our operating loss during such period and the
payment of expenses and accounts payable.
As
indicated in Note 5 to our financial statements, we incurred a net operating
loss of $56,278 for the year ended December 31, 2009 and we have an accumulated
deficit of $276,021 as of December 31, 2009. In addition, we had only
$2,620 in revenues for the year ended December 31, 2009. These
conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern. The financial statements included with this report do not include
any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these
uncertainties.
9
At
December 31, 2009, we did not have sufficient resources to permit us to continue
our business plan and conduct our operations for the next six months and we were
dependent on the receipt of additional debt or equity funding in order to
continue our operations. In March 2010, we sold 170,000 shares of our
common stock in two private transactions
for $25,500 to provide the Company with additional working capital, which we
believe will permit us to continue our operations for a minimum of six
months. Except for the foregoing, we have not entered into any
agreement or arrangement for the provision of additional funding and no
assurance can be given that such funding will be available to us on acceptable
terms or at all. As a result of the downturn in our business, during
the 2009 fiscal year our officers agreed to forego compensation pending an
increase in operating revenue or our receipt of additional
financing.
Cash
Flows
Operating
Activities
Net cash
used by operating activities was $41,262 for the 2009 fiscal year resulting
primarily from the net loss of $56,278 partially offset by $12,024 in
depreciation. Net cash used by operating activities was $100,731
during the 2008 fiscal year resulting primarily from the net loss of $98,661
partially offset by $16,848 in depreciation.
Investing
Activities
Net cash
used by investing activities was $0 in 2009 compared to net cash used in
investing activities of $7,116 during 2008 resulting from the purchase and sale
of equipment.
Financing
Activities
Net cash
provided by financing activities was $0 in 2009 compared to $150,000 in
2008. The decrease is the result of the Company’s receipt of $150,000
during the 2008 as a result of the completion of our public
offering.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States requires our management to make
assumptions, estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the
financial statements, including the notes thereto, and related disclosures of
commitments and contingencies, if any. We consider our critical
accounting policies to be those that require the more significant judgments and
estimates in the preparation of financial statements, including the
following:
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company recognizes revenue upon delivery of its precast concrete
products.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
The
allowance for doubtful accounts reflects the Company’s best estimate of probable
losses inherent in the accounts receivable balance. The Company determines the
allowance based on known troubled accounts, historical experience, and other
currently available evidence. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had
a zero balance in the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company
recorded a bad debt expense of $550 for the year ended December 31,
2009.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
Company has determined that the book value of the Company’s financial
instruments at December 31, 2009 and 2008 approximates fair value.
Use
of Estimates
In
preparing the Company’s financial statements, management is required to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could materially differ from those
estimates.
10
Depreciation
The
Company’s fixed assets consist mainly of machinery and equipment used to produce
the concrete products it uses in its operations. The Company provides for
depreciation of its equipment by the straight-line method, using an estimated
useful life of 7 years. Depreciation expense for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $12,024 and $16,848, respectively.
Basic
and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic
earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net earnings available
to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share is computed similarly to
basic earnings (loss) per common share, except that the denominator is increased
to include the number of additional common shares that would have been
outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional
common shares were dilutive. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the
Company did not have any dilutive common stock equivalents.
Income
Taxes
On
December 31, 2009, the Company had a net operating loss available for carry
forward of $276,021. The tax benefit of approximately $96,600 from the loss
carry forward has been fully offset by a valuation reserve because the use of
the future tax benefit is doubtful as the Company has been unable to establish a
projection of operating profits for future years. The loss carryover will begin
to expire in 2025.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
Management
believes that the adoption of any new relevant accounting pronouncements will
not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or its
financial position.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
The
Company has not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are
reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on its financial condition,
changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations,
liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources that is material to
investors.
Item
7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market
Risk
Because
the Company is a Smaller Reporting Company, it is not required to respond to
this Item.
Item
8. Financial Statements
The
following financial statements are being filed with this report and are located
immediately following the signature page.
Consolidated
Financial Statements, December 31, 2009
Independent
Auditors’ Report
Consolidated
Balance Sheets, December 31, 2009 and 2008
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008.
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
Item
9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
None.
11
Item
9A(T). Controls and Procedures
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our
President and Treasurer who serves as our principal executive and principal
financial office, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“the Exchange Act”) as of
December 31, 2009, the end of the period covered by this
report. Based upon that evaluation, our President and Treasurer,
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2009
were effective such that the information required to be disclosed by us in
reports filed under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii)
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our President and
Treasurer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
disclosure. A controls system cannot provide absolute assurance that
the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if
any, within a company have been detected.
Management’s
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the
Exchange Act). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its
inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be
effective can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control
objectives. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to
future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our
management, with the participation of our President and Treasurer, who serves as
our principal executive and principal financial officer, evaluated the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2009. In making this evaluation, our management used the
COSO framework, an integrated framework for the evaluation of internal controls
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on this evaluation, our management, with the participation of President
and Treasurer concluded that as of December 31, 2009, the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting was effective.
In conducting its evaluation,
our President and Treasurer identified a deficiency in the Company’s internal control,
which arises from the fact that the Company’s principal executive and
principal financial officers are the same person, which does not allow for segregation of
duties. The President
and Treasurer believes the deficiency is mitigated by the limited number of
transactions each year and the engagement of an outside certified public
accounting firm to assist us with period end financial disclosure and reporting
processes and the preparation of quarterly financial statements. As
such, our President and Treasurer does not believe the deficiency has a material
effect on the accuracy and completeness of our financial reporting and
disclosure as included in this report or that the deficiency constitutes a
material weakness such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material
misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be
prevented or deterred on a timely basis.
This
Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s
independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over
financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to
provide only management’s report in this annual report.
12
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During
the 2009 fiscal year, we engaged an outside certified public accounting firm to
assist us with period end financial disclosure and reporting processes and to
prepare our quarterly financial statements. Except for the foregoing,
there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the
quarter ended December 31, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
Item
9B. Other Information
None.
13
Part
III
Item
10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate
Governance
Directors
and Executive Officers
The
following table indicates the name, age, term of office and position held by
each of our officers and directors. The term of office for each
officer position is for one year or until his or her successor is duly elected
and qualified by the board of directors. The term of office for a
director is for one year or until his or her successor is duly elected and
qualified by the stockholders.
Name
|
Age
|
Term
Of
Office
|
Positions Held
|
Jason
Haislip
|
36
|
2010
|
President,
Treasurer and Director
|
Amie
Coleman
|
27
|
2010
|
Secretary
and Director
|
Duane
J. Smith
|
51
|
2010
|
Vice
President and Director
|
________________________
Certain
biographical information with respect to our officers and directors is set forth
below.
Jason T. Haislip, is a
founder and principal stockholder of the Company and has served as president
from January 10, 2008 to the present, as secretary from March 2005 through
January 10, 2008 and as treasurer and a director of the Company since its
inception in March 2005. From November 2008 to the present, Mr.
Haislip has also been employed by L.N. Curtis & Sons Sales as a sales
representative for fire fighting equipment. From March 2000 through
April 2005, Mr. Haislip was employed by L.N. Curtis & Sons Sales in a
similar capacity.
Amie Coleman, is a founder and principal stockholder of the Company
who has served as secretary and a director of the Company since January 10,
2008. Ms. Coleman is and has since November 2004, been self-employed
as a hair stylist. Since 2008, she has also been engaged on a
part-time basis as a certified Pilates instructor at Poise and Strength
Pilates. From approximately 2005 through 2008, she was employed by
Salon Juliano where she completed an apprenticeship to be a licensed
cosmetologist.
Duane J. Smith, was appointed
as vice president and a director of the Company on January 10,
2008. Mr. Smith is also self-employed as a licensed general
contractor and ranch foreman. From approximately January 2000 through
January 2009, Mr. Smith was also the president and owner of Day & Night
Glass, a commercial and residential glass company.
Family
Relationships
There are
no family relationships among our directors, executive officers or persons
nominated or chosen to become directors or executive officers.
Director
Meetings and Stockholder Meeting Attendance
The Board
of Directors held no formal meetings during 2009, but the directors met on
several occasions during 2009 for informal discussions and took action by
unanimous written consents in lieu of meetings. Our policy is to
encourage, but not require, members of the Board of Directors to attend annual
stockholder meetings. We did not have an annual stockholder meeting during the
prior year.
Board
of Directors
Our board
of directors consists of three persons; Jason Haislip, Amie Coleman and Duane
Smith. None of our directors is “independent” within the meaning of
Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ Marketplace because they are officers and
employees of the Company.
Our board
of directors has not appointed any standing committees, there is no separately
designated audit committee and the entire board of directors acts as our audit
committee. The board of directors does not have an independent
“financial expert” because it does not believe the scope of the Company’s
activities to date has justified the expense involved in obtaining such a
financial expert. In addition, our securities are not listed on a
national exchange and we are not
subject to the special corporate governance requirements of any such
exchange.
14
The
Company does not have a compensation committee and the entire board participates
in the consideration of executive officer and director
compensation. The Company’s executive officers are also members of
the Company’s board of directors and such persons participate in determining the
amount and form of executive and director compensation. To date, the
Company has not engaged independent compensation consultants to determine or
recommend the amount or form of executive or director compensation.
The
Company does not have a standing nominating committee and the Company’s entire
board of directors performs the functions that would customarily be performed by
a nominating committee. The board of directors does not believe a
separate nominating committee is required at this time due to the limited size
of the Company’s business operations and the limited resources of the Company
which do not permit it to compensate its directors. The board of
directors has not established policies with regard to the consideration of
director candidates recommended by security holders or the minimum
qualifications of such candidates.
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
The
Company does not have a class of equity securities registered pursuant to
Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As a result, no
reports are required to be filed pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
by the Company’s directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than
10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities.
Code
of Ethics
We have
not adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to our executive officers, including
our principal executive, financial and accounting officers. We do not
believe the adoption of a code of ethics at this time would provide any
meaningful additional protection to the Company because we have only three
employees, all of whom are officers and directors, and our business operations
are not extensive or complex.
Item
11. Executive Compensation
The
following table sets forth certain information regarding the annual compensation
paid to our chief executive officer in all capacities for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008. No executive officer of the Company received total
annual compensation in excess of $100,000 per year during the 2009 or 2008
fiscal years.
Summary
Compensation Table
Name
and
Principal
Position
|
Year
|
Salary
|
Bonus
|
Stock
Awards
|
Option
Awards
|
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compen-sation
|
All
Other Compen-sation
|
Total
|
Jason
T. Haislip
|
2009
|
$ 3,347
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
$ 3,347
|
President(1)
|
2008
|
$25,748
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
$25,748
|
(1)
|
Jason
Haislip served as secretary of the Company from its inception in March
2005 through January 10, 2008, as treasurer from inception in March 2005
through the present and as president from January 10, 2008 to the
present.
|
We have
not granted our officers or directors any stock options, stock awards or other
forms of equity compensation. We do not currently provide our
officers or directors with medical insurance or other similar employee benefits,
although we may do so in the future.
15
We do not
have any retirement, pension, profit sharing, or insurance or medical
reimbursement plans covering our officers or directors, and we are not
contemplating implementing any such plans at this time.
Officer
Compensation
The
compensation for our officers is determined by our board of directors based on
management’s recommendations. Jason Haislip, president and director,
and Duane Smith, vice president and director, participate in the determination
of management compensation. We previously agreed to pay Jason
Haislip, president and treasurer, an annual base salary of $40,000 per year and
to pay Duane Smith, vice president, an annual base salary of $6,000 per
year. However, as a result of the downturn in the Company’s business
during 2009, such persons agreed to serve without compensation pending an
increase in revenues from operations or our receipt of additional financing. We
will continue to reimburse our officers for reasonable costs and expenses
incurred by them in connection with our business. We may pay
additional compensation to our officers in the future, including medical
insurance and retirement benefits and increases in compensation, if justified
based on the growth of our business and the time such persons are required to
devote to our business. We have not entered into an employment
agreement with any of our officers.
Director
Compensation
Our
directors do not currently receive any compensation for serving in their
capacity as directors. Duane Smith, who is also an officer of the
Company, was paid $500 in salary during 2009 and was paid $2,118 as rent for the
Company’s manufacturing facility. The rent for such manufacturing
facility was originally $500 per month but was subsequently reduced to $400 per
month. Mr. Smith, the landlord, has forgiven the rent for certain
months during 2008 and 2009 as a result of the downturn in our
business.
Item
12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management
and
Related Stockholder Matters
The
following table sets forth as of March 24, 2010, the number of shares of the
Company’s common stock, par value $0.001, owned of record or beneficially by
each person known to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of the issued and
outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, and by each of the Company’s
officers and directors, and by all officers and directors as a
group. On such date, there were 3,808,348 issued and outstanding
shares of our common stock.
Title
of Class
|
Beneficial
Owner (1)
|
Amount
|
Percentage
Ownership
|
|||
Principal
Stockholders
|
||||||
Common
Stock
|
Cambria
Investment Fund, L.P.
(2)
2321
Rosecrans Ave. Suite 4270
El
Segundo, CA 90245
|
251,875
|
6.4%
|
|||
Common
Stock
|
Steven
Timmins
471
Meadow House Lane
Hoytsville,
UT 84017
|
200,000
|
5.3%
|
|||
Common
Stock
|
Michael
Vanderhoof(3)
P.O.
Box 715
Oakley,
UT 84055
|
636,278
|
16.3%
|
|||
Officers
and Directors
|
||||||
Common
Stock
|
Amie
Coleman
|
1,450,000
|
38.1%
|
|||
Common
Stock
|
Jason
T. Haislip
|
700,000
|
18.4%
|
|||
Common
Stock
|
Duane
J. Smith
|
0
|
-
|
|||
Common
Stock
|
All
Executive Officers
|
|||||
And
Directors as a Group (Three
Persons)
|
2,150,000
|
56.5%
|
|
_____________________
|
(1)
|
Except
as otherwise noted, the shares are owned beneficially and of record, and
such record stockholder has sole voting, investment, and dispositive power
over the shares indicated.
|
16
(2)
|
Includes
100,000 shares which may be acquired by Cambria Investment Fund at a price
of $0.10 per share pursuant to presently exercisable common stock purchase
warrants. The shares of common stock underlying the warrants are deemed to
be outstanding shares for the purpose of computing the stockholder’s
percentage ownership.
|
(3)
|
Includes
306,473 shares of which Mr. Vanderhoof is the record and beneficial owner,
77,930 shares owned of record by his spouse, and 151,875 shares and
100,000 presently exercisable common stock purchase warrants owned of
record by Cambria Investment Fund, L.P., with respect to which Mr.
Vanderhoof may be deemed to share investment and dispositive power as a
result of his status as a manager of the general partner of Cambria
Investment Fund, L.P. The shares of common stock underlying the warrants
are deemed to be outstanding shares for the purpose of computing the
stockholder’s percentage ownership. Subsequent to March 18,
2010, Mr. Vanderhoof acquired an additional 100,000 shares of common stock
from the Company in a private
transaction.
|
Item
13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Unless
otherwise indicated, the terms of the following transactions between related
parties were not determined as a result of arm’s length
negotiations.
Office
and Manufacturing Space
Our
executive offices are located at the residence of our president and we pay no
rent for the use of such space. We reimburse our president for actual
out-of-pocket costs incurred on our behalf for paper, copies, long distance
telephone charges and similar items used in connection with our
operations. Our manufacturing operations are located in a
manufacturing and warehouse facility owned by our vice president and located at
11744 South 2700 West, Riverton, Utah. We use approximately one-third
of the facility on a shared basis pursuant
to an oral, month-to-month arrangement. We originally paid $500 per
month as rent for such facility but such rent was subsequently reduced to $400
per month. The landlord has forgiven the rent for certain months
during 2008 and 2009 as a result of the downturn in our business. We
believe the terms of such rental arrangement are no less favorable to the
Company than those that could be negotiated at arm’s length with an unrelated
third party.
Promotional
Shares Lock-In Agreement
In
accordance with requirements imposed by the Utah Securities Division with regard
to the Company’s initial public offering, the Company entered into that certain
Promotional Shares Lock-In Agreement (the “Lock-In Agreement”) dated as of
December 5, 2007, with Jason Haislip and Mathew Martindale, then officers,
directors and principal stockholders of the Company, and Amie Coleman, then
spouse of Mathew Martindale and a principal stockholder of the Company
(collectively, the “Lock-In Holders”). The Lock-In Agreement
generally provides that while the Lock-In Agreement is in effect, the Lock-In
Holders will not sell, transfer, hypothecate or otherwise dispose of an
aggregate of 2,150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock held by them except:
(a) by will, the laws of descent and distribution, the operation of law or by
court order; (b) the hypothecation by the estate of a deceased Lock-In Holder to
pay the expenses of the deceased person’s estate; and (c) by gift to the Lock-In
Holder’s family members as long as the Promotional Shares remain subject to the
terms of the Lock-In Agreement. The Promotional Shares will be
released from the requirements of the Lock-In Agreement as follows: (a)
beginning two years after the completion date of the Offering, 2 ½ % of the
Promotional Shares may be released each quarter on a pro rata basis and on the
fourth anniversary of the Offering all remaining Promotional Shares shall be
released; and (b) notwithstanding the foregoing, all of the Promotional Shares
shall be released from the Lock-In Agreement upon the occurrence of one of the
following events: (i) the Offering is terminated and either no securities were
sold in the Offering or the proceeds received from investors from the sale of
securities in the Offering have been returned to the investors; (ii) the
Offering did not qualify for registration with the Utah Securities Division;
(iii) the Company’s common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board (or any
successor thereto having substantially the same eligibility and reporting
requirements) and the bid price for such stock posted by non-affiliated market
makers is equal to or greater than the $0.15 offering price for the Offering (as
adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends etc.) for a period of 20 consecutive
trading days; or (iv) the Company’s common stock should become a “Covered
Security” as defined in Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act. If,
during the time the Lock-In Agreement is in effect,
17
the
Company enters into any merger, reorganization, liquidation, dissolution or
other transaction or proceeding with a person who is not a promoter of the
Company that results in a distribution of the Company’s assets or
securities, then: (a) all holders of the Company’s equity securities will
initially share on a pro rata, per share basis in the distribution, in
proportion to the amount of cash or other consideration that they paid per share
for their equity securities (provided that the Utah Securities Division has
accepted the value of the other consideration), until the stockholders who
purchased the Company’s equity securities in the Offering (the “Public
Stockholders”) have received, or have had irrevocably set aside for them, an
amount that is equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the offering price per
share times the number of shares of equity securities they purchased in the
Offering and which they still hold at the time of the distribution, as adjusted
for stock splits, stock dividends recapitalizations and the like; (b) after such
distribution, all holders of the Company’s equity securities will participate on
an equal, per share basis times the number of shares of equity securities they
held at the time of the distribution, adjusted for stock splits, stock
dividends, recapitalizations and the like; and (c) a distribution may proceed on
lesser terms and conditions than the terms and conditions stated above if a
majority of the equity securities that are not held by promoters, or their
associates or affiliates, vote, or consent by consent procedure to approve the
lesser terms and conditions at a special meeting called for that specific
purpose. If the Company enters into any merger, reorganization, liquidation,
dissolution or other transaction or proceeding with a promoter that results in a
distribution while this Agreement remains in effect, the Promotional Shares will
remain subject to the terms of the Lock-In Agreement. At the time the
Lock-In Agreement was executed, 1,300,000 of the Promotional Shares were owned
jointly by Mathew Martindale and Amie Coleman. In January 2008, Mr.
Martindale conveyed all his interest in such shares to Amie Coleman and the
shares remained subject to the Lock-In Agreement.
The
foregoing description of the Lock-In Agreement is summary in nature and is
qualified by reference to the Lock-In Agreement, a copy of which is included as
an exhibit to this report.
Indemnification
Our
articles of incorporation provide that our directors shall have no personal
liability to our company or our stockholders for damages for breaches
of their fiduciary duties as directors or officers, except for acts or omissions
which involve intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law, or
the payment of certain unlawful distributions. In addition, Section
78.037 of the Nevada corporation law, Article VI of our articles of
incorporation, and Article VIII of our bylaws provide for indemnification of our
directors and officers in a variety of circumstances, which may include
liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Insofar as
indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be
permitted to directors, officers, and controlling persons pursuant to the
foregoing provisions, we have been informed that in the opinion of the
Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is contrary to public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act and, therefore, is
unenforceable.
Item
14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Madsen
& Associates CPA’s Inc. served as the Company’s independent accountants for
the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
During
the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, fees for
services provided by Madsen & Associates CPA’s, Inc. were as
follows:
Year
Ended
|
||||||||
December
31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Audit
Fees
|
$
|
7,000
|
$
|
15,350
|
||||
Audit-Related
Fees
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Tax
Fees
|
375
|
375
|
||||||
All
Other Fees
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total
|
$
|
7,375
|
$
|
15,725
|
||||
|
|
18
“Audit
Fees” consisted of fees billed for services rendered for the audit of the
Company’s annual financial statements, review of financial statements included
in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and other services
normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory
filings. “Audit-Related Fees” consisted of fees billed for due
diligence procedures in connection with acquisitions and divestitures and
consultation regarding financial accounting and reporting
matters. “Tax Fees” consisted of fees billed for tax payment planning
and tax preparation services. “All Other Fees” consisted of fees
billed for services in connection with legal matters and technical accounting
research.
The
Company’s Board of Directors has adopted a policy requiring the pre-approval of
any non-audit engagement of Madsen & Associates CPA’s, Inc. and has
pre-approved the engagement of such firm to assist the Company with federal and
state tax returns. In the event the Company wishes to engage such
firm to perform accounting, technical, diligence or other permitted services not
related to the services performed by such firm as our independent auditor, the
Company’s President will prepare a summary of the proposed engagement, detailing
the nature of the engagement, the reasons why Madsen & Associates CPA’s,
Inc. is the preferred provider of such services and the estimated duration and
cost of the engagement. The report will be provided to our Board of Directors,
who will evaluate whether the proposed engagement will interfere with the
independence of such firm in the performance of its auditing
services.
Item
15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
The
following documents are included as exhibits to this report.
(a)
Exhibits
Exhibit
Number
|
SEC
Reference Number
|
Title
of Document
|
Location
|
|||
3.1
|
3
|
Articles
of Incorporation
|
Incorporated
by Reference*
|
|||
3.2
|
3
|
Bylaws
|
Incorporated
by Reference*
|
|||
10.1
|
10
|
Warrant
to Purchase Securities Between Castwell Precast Corporation and Cambria
Investment Fund, LP dated November 14, 2005
|
Incorporated
by Reference*
|
|||
10.2
|
10
|
Proceeds
Escrow Agreement between Castwell Precast Corporation and Colonial Stock
Transfer dated as of December 7, 2007
|
Incorporated
by Reference**
|
|||
10.3
|
10
|
Promotional
Shares Lock-In Agreement among Castwell Precast Corporation, Jason Haislip
and Amie Martindale dated as of December 6, 2007
|
Incorporated
by Reference**
|
|||
21.1
|
21
|
Schedule
of Subsidiaries
|
This
Filing
|
|||
31.1
|
31
|
Section
302 Certification of Chief Executive and Chief Financial
Officer
|
This
Filing
|
|||
32.1
|
32
|
Section
1350 Certification of Chief Executive and Chief
Financial
Officer
|
This
Filing
|
*Incorporated
by reference to the Company’ Form SB-2 Registration Statement filed July 16,
2007
**Incorporated
by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’ Form SB-2 Registration Statement
filed December 11, 2007.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CASTWELL
PRECAST CORPORATION
(Registrant)
Dated:
March 31,
2010 By
/s/ Jason T.
Haislip
Jason T. Haislip, President
Jason T. Haislip, President
In
accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
Dated:
March 31,
2010 By
/s/ Jason T.
Haislip
Jason T. Haislip
Jason T. Haislip
President, Treasurer and Director
(Principal Executive and Accounting Officer)
Dated:
March 31,
2010 By
/s/ Amie
Coleman
Amie Coleman
Amie Coleman
Secretary
and Director
Dated:
March 31,
2010 By
/s/ Duane
Smith
Duane Smith
Duane Smith
Vice President and Director
20
CASTWELL
PRECAST CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December
31, 2009
- F-1 -
CASTWELL
PRECAST CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONTENTS
|
|
PAGE
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | F-3 |
Consolidated
Balance Sheets, December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
F-4
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the years ended
|
|
December
31, 2009 and 2008
|
F-5
|
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years
|
|
ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
F-6
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
|
|
December
31, 2009 and 2008
|
F-7
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-8
- F-11
|
- F-2 -
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Board of Directors and
Stockholders
of Castwell Precast Corp. and Subsidiary
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Castwell Precast Corp.
and Subsidiary (the Company) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31,
2009. Castwell Precast Corp. and Subsidiary’s management is
responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the consolidated financial statements are free of material
misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we
engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial
reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over
financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well
as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Castwell Precast Corp. and
Subsidiary as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations
and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December
31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that
the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has an
accumulated deficit and recurring net operating losses, which raises substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s
plans in regard to these matters are described in Note 5 to the consolidated
financial statements. These consolidated financial statements do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
/s/ Madsen &
Associates CPA’s, Inc.
Madsen
& Associates CPA’s, Inc.
Salt Lake
City, Utah
March 31,
2010
F-2
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
||||||
December
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||
ASSETS
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||
Current
Assets:
|
||||||
Cash
|
$ |
1,362
|
$ |
42,624
|
||
Accounts
Receivable
|
-
|
550
|
||||
Total
Current Assets
|
1,362
|
43,174
|
||||
Equipment
|
93,332
|
93,332
|
||||
Less: Accumulated
Depreciation
|
(61,938)
|
(49,914)
|
||||
Total
Equipment
|
31,394
|
43,418
|
||||
Total
Assets
|
$ |
32,756
|
$ |
86,592
|
||
LIABILITIES
& STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||
Current
Liabilities
|
||||||
Accrued
Expenses
|
$ |
3,942
|
$ |
1,500
|
||
Total
Liabilities
|
3,942
|
1,500
|
||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
-
|
-
|
||||
Stockholders'
Equity
|
||||||
Preferred
Stock - $.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares
|
||||||
authorized,
no shares issued and outstanding
|
-
|
-
|
||||
Common
Stock - $.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares
|
||||||
authorized,
3,808,348 shares issued and outstanding
|
3,808
|
3,808
|
||||
Additional
Paid-in-Capital
|
301,027
|
301,027
|
||||
Accumulated
Deficit
|
(276,021)
|
(219,743)
|
||||
Total
Stockholders' Equity
|
28,814
|
85,092
|
||||
Total
Liabilities and Stockholder' Equity
|
$ |
32,756
|
$ |
86,592
|
||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements
|
- F-4 -
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
|
|||||
December
31,
|
December
31,
|
||||
2009
|
2008
|
||||
Revenues
|
$ |
2,620
|
$ |
25,316
|
|
Cost
of Goods Sold
|
3,307
|
20,096
|
|||
Gross
Profit
|
(687)
|
5,220
|
|||
Expenses:
|
|||||
General
and Administrative (Note 4)
|
43,017
|
86,940
|
|||
Bad
debt expense
|
550
|
-
|
|||
Marketing
|
-
|
93
|
|||
Depreciation
|
12,024
|
16,848
|
|||
Total
Operating Expenses
|
55,591
|
103,881
|
|||
Net
Loss
|
$ |
(56,278)
|
$ |
(98,661)
|
|
Weighted
Average Common Shares Outstanding
|
3,808,348
|
3,558,348
|
|||
Basic
and Diluted Loss per Common Share
|
$ |
(0.01)
|
$ |
(0.03)
|
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements
|
- F-5 -
Castwell
Precast Corp. and Subsidiary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
Statements Of Stockholders' Equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
|
Preferred
|
Common
|
Common
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
|
Stock
|
Stock
|
Stock
|
Paid-In
|
Accumulated
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Deficit
|
Equity
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balances
as of January 1, 2008
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
2,808,348
|
$
|
2,808
|
$
|
152,027
|
$
|
(121,082)
|
$
|
33,753
|
|||||||||||
Sale
of common stock; April 4, 2008
|
-
|
-
|
1,000,000
|
1,000
|
149,000
|
-
|
150,000
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
(loss) for the year ended December 31, 2008
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(98,661)
|
(98,661)
|
||||||||||||||||
Balances
as of December 31, 2008
|
-
|
-
|
3,808,348
|
3,808
|
301,027
|
(219,743)
|
85,092
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
(loss) for the year ended December 31, 2009
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(56,278)
|
(56,278)
|
||||||||||||||||
Balances
as of December 31, 2009
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
3,808,348
|
$
|
3,808
|
$
|
301,027
|
$
|
(276,021)
|
$
|
28,814
|
|||||||||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements
|
- F-6 -
Castwell
Precast Corp. and Subsidiary
|
||||||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
||||||
December
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities:
|
||||||
Net
(Loss)
|
$
|
(56,278)
|
$
|
(98,661)
|
||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash
|
||||||
Provided
by operating activities:
|
||||||
Depreciation
|
12,024
|
16,848
|
||||
Changes
in current assets and liabilities:
|
||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
550
|
6,582
|
||||
Accrued
expenses
|
2,442
|
(25,500)
|
||||
Net
cash Provided by (Used by) Operating Activities
|
(41,262)
|
(100,731)
|
||||
Cash
flows from Investing Activities
|
||||||
Proceeds
from sale of equipment
|
430
|
|||||
Purchase
of equipment
|
-
|
(7,546)
|
||||
Net
cash (Used by) Investing Activities
|
-
|
(7,116)
|
||||
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities:
|
||||||
Common
stock issued for Cash
|
-
|
150,000
|
||||
Net
cash Provided by Financing Activities
|
-
|
150,000
|
||||
Net
(Decrease) Increase in Cash
|
(41,262)
|
42,153
|
||||
Cash
at Beginning of Period
|
42,624
|
471
|
||||
Cash
at End of Period
|
$
|
1,362
|
$
|
42,624
|
||
Cash
paid for:
|
||||||
Interest
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||
Taxes
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements
|
- F-7 -
CASTWELL
PRECAST CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE
1 – ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS
Castwell
Precast Corp. (the “Company”) was incorporated in Nevada on March 25, 2005.
Since inception, the Company’s purpose has been to design, develop, and market
precast concrete products.
On March
25, 2005, the Company formed Castwell Precast, Inc. to be operated as a
subsidiary of the Company. As of December 31, 2009, the Company owned 100% of
the shares of issued and outstanding stock of Castwell Precast,
Inc.
NOTE
2 – SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary
of the Company’s significant accounting policies applied in the preparation of
the accompanying financial statements follows.
REVENUE
RECOGNITION
The
Company recognizes revenue upon delivery of its precast concrete
products.
ALLOWANCE
FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
The
allowance for doubtful accounts reflects the Company’s best estimate of probable
losses inherent in the accounts receivable balance. The Company
determines the allowance based on the known troubled accounts, historical
experience, and other currently available evidence. As of December
31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had a zero balance in the allowance for doubtful
accounts. The Company recorded bad debt expense of $550 for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
FAIR
VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The
Company has determined that the book value of the Company’s financial
instruments at December 31, 2009 and 2008 approximates fair value.
USE OF
ESTIMATES
In
preparing the Company’s financial statements, management is required to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could materially differ from those
estimates.
DEPRECIATION
The
Company’s fixed assets consist mainly of machinery and equipment used to produce
concrete products it uses in its operations. The Company provides for
depreciation of its equipment by the straight-line method, using an estimated
useful life of 7 years. Depreciation expense for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $12,024 and $16,848, respectively.
- F-8 -
CASTWELL
PRECAST CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE
2 – SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BASIC AND
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic
earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing the net earnings
available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share is computed
similarly to basic earnings (loss) per common share, except that the denominator
is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have
been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the
additional common shares were dilutive. As of December 31, 2009 and
2008, the Company did not have any dilutive common stock
equivalents.
INCOME
TAXES
On
December 31, 2009, the Company had a net operating loss available for carry
forward of $276,021. The tax benefit of approximately $96,600 from
the loss carry forward has been fully offset by a valuation reserve because the
use of the future tax benefit is doubtful as the Company has been unable to
establish a projection of operating profits for future years. The
loss carryover will begin to expire in 2025.
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Management
believes that the adoption of any new relevant accounting pronouncements will
not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or its
financial position.
NOTE
3 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
During
2005, the Company issued 100,000 warrants in conjunction with debt. This debt
was converted to stock in December 2005, and the warrants remain outstanding as
of June 30, 2008. At the time the warrants and debt were issued, the warrants
were valued using the Black-Scholes model, and the related value was not
material to the financial statement presentation.
The
Company has authorized 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.001,
and 50,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.001.
On April
4, 2008, the Company completed the sale of 1,000,000 shares of common stock
offered pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-1. The
offering price was $0.15 per share and the Company received gross proceeds of
$150,000.
As of
December 31, 2009 the Company had zero shares of preferred stock outstanding and
3,808,348 shares of common stock outstanding.
- F-9 -
CASTWELL
PRECAST CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE
4 – GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
For the
year ended December 31, 2009, general and administrative expenses consisted of
the following:
Office
|
$
|
276
|
Legal/Professional
|
32,265
|
|
Supplies
|
631
|
|
Auto
|
1,837
|
|
Insurance
|
623
|
|
Taxes/Licenses
|
362
|
|
Payroll
|
4,326
|
|
Rent
|
2,210
|
|
Utilities
|
487
|
|
$
|
43,017
|
For the
year ended December 31, 2008, general and administrative expenses consisted of
the following:
Office
|
$
|
6,885
|
Legal/Professional
|
32,713
|
|
Supplies
|
191
|
|
Auto
|
5,965
|
|
Insurance
|
3,316
|
|
Taxes/Licenses
|
350
|
|
Payroll
|
31,156
|
|
Rent
|
5,580
|
|
Utilities
|
784
|
|
$
|
86,940
|
NOTE
5 – GOING CONCERN
The
Company incurred a net operating loss of $56,278 and $98,661 for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 and has an accumulated deficit of $276,021 as of
December 31, 2009. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
ability of the Company to continue as a going concern. The financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
these uncertainties.
Management’s plans to overcome the
Company’s negative cash flows from operating activities and recurring operating
losses include increased marketing activity in an attempt to increase the
Company’s sales of window wells in connection with remodels as opposed to new
construction, an attempt to identify other sources of revenue to provide the
Company with cash flow pending the recovery of the housing market, and the
reduction of operating expenses. No assurances can be given that the
Company will be able to accomplish these objectives or that if achieved, they
will be adequate to eliminate the Company’s operating losses. If the
Company is unable to stem its history of operating losses before its capital is
exhausted, it will be required to seek additional debt or equity funding in
order to continue its operations. The Company has not entered into any
agreements or arrangement with regard to the provision of such additional
funding and no assurances can be given that such funding will be
available to the Company.
- F-10 -
CASTWELL
PRECAST CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE
6 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In March
2010, the Company sold 170,000 shares of its common stock in two private
transactions for $25,500.
The
Company has evaluated subsequent events through March 31, 2010, which is the
date the financial statements were issued.
- F-11 -