SUNLINK HEALTH SYSTEMS INC - Annual Report: 2015 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015

OR

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File No. 1-12607

SunLink Health Systems, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

900 Circle 75 Parkway, Suite 1120, Atlanta, Georgia 30339

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (770) 933-7000

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Indicate by check mark whether if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

        At the close of business on September 25, 2015, there were 9,443,408 shares of the registrant’s common shares without par value outstanding. The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the closing price on December 31, 2014 of the registrant’s common shares as reported by NYSE Amex Equities stock exchange amounted to $7,129,321.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed under Regulation 14A in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of SunLink Health Systems, Inc., scheduled to be held on November 9, 2015, have been incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report. The Proxy Statement or an amendment to this Annual Report will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after June 30, 2015.

Certain Cautionary Statements

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report and the documents that are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include all statements that do not relate solely to historical or current facts and may be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “believe,” “will,” “expect,” “project,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “plan” or “continue.” These forward-looking statements are based on current plans and expectations and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors which could significantly affect current plans and expectations and our future financial condition and results. These factors, which could cause actual results, performance and achievements to differ materially from those anticipated, include, but are not limited to:

General Business Conditions

Operational Factors

2

Liabilities, Claims, Obligations and Other Matters

Regulation and Governmental Activity

3

Dispositions, Acquisitions, and Renovation Related Matters

The foregoing are significant factors we think could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected results. However, there could be additional factors besides those listed herein that also could affect SunLink in an adverse manner.

You should read this Annual Report completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. You are cautioned not to unduly rely on forward-looking statements when evaluating the information presented in this Annual Report or our other disclosures because current plans, anticipated actions, and future financial conditions and results may differ from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of SunLink.

We have not undertaken any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. All of our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of the document in which they are made or, if a date is specified, as of such date. We disclaim any obligation or undertaking to provide any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement to reflect any change in our expectations or any changes in events, conditions, circumstances or information on which the forward-looking statement is based. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing factors and the other risk factors set forth elsewhere in this report.

4

PART I

Overview

SunLink Health Systems, Inc., through subsidiaries, owns businesses which are a provider of healthcare services in certain markets in the United States. Unless the context indicates otherwise, all references to “SunLink,” “we,” “our,” “ours,” “us” and the “Company” refer to SunLink Health Systems, Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries. References to our specific operations refer to operations conducted through our subsidiaries and references to “we,” “our,” “ours,” and “us” in such context refer to the operations of our subsidiaries. Our business is composed of the ownership of two business segments, the Healthcare Facilities Segment and the Specialty Pharmacy Segment. Our Healthcare Facilities Segment subsidiaries own and operate a total of three community hospitals in two states. Our community hospitals are acute care hospitals and have a total of 183 licensed beds. As part of the community hospital operations, our subsidiaries currently also operate two nursing homes in two states, each of which is located adjacent to, or in close proximity with, one of the community hospitals. The nursing homes have a total of 166 licensed beds. A subsidiary also owns a hospital building that is currently vacant except for two offices rented by a physician and a testing lab. Our Specialty Pharmacy Segment subsidiary operates a specialty pharmacy business in Louisiana with four service lines.

SunLink’s executive offices are located at 900 Circle 75 Parkway, Suite 1120, Atlanta, Georgia 30339, and our telephone number is (770) 933-7000. Our website address is “www.sunlinkhealth.com.” Information contained on our website does not constitute part of this report. Any materials we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) may be read at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580 Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Certain materials we file with the SEC may also be read and copied at or through our website or at the Internet website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov.

History

We are an Ohio corporation incorporated in June 1959. In 2001 we redirected our business strategy toward healthcare services in the United States. On February 1, 2001, we purchased five community hospitals, leasehold rights for a sixth hospital and the related businesses of all six hospitals. We subsequently have acquired two hospitals and sold four hospitals and three home health businesses. We also sold the operations of one hospital to a buyer who leased the hospital building from us but which subsequently ceased its hospital operations. In 2008 a wholly-owned subsidiary acquired Carmichael’s Cashway Pharmacy, Inc. (“Carmichael”) which provides retail and institutional pharmacy services to various communities in southwest Louisiana and eastern Texas.

Business Strategy: Operations, Dispositions and Acquisitions

SunLink’s business strategy is to focus its efforts on improving internal operations of its existing healthcare facilities and its pharmacy business. We also consider from time to time potential healthcare facility upgrades, acquisitions, development and dispositions, including but not limited to hospitals, physician clinics, nursing, long-term care and assisted living homes, medical office buildings and pharmacy businesses. We consider dispositions of facilities or operations based on a variety of factors including asset values, return on investments, competition from existing and potential, competitors, capital improvement needs, corporate strategy and other corporate objectives.

Since fiscal 2012, our efforts have been more focused on the disposition of hospital facilities than on acquisitions due to our financial position and need to reduce our leverage and interest expense, the changing nature of certain of our subsidiary hospital markets resulting in, among other things, substantial additional competition, and pressure from Federal and state programs (e.g., Medicare and Medicaid) and private payors to

5

reduce reimbursement for medical services. Since June 30, 2012, we have sold three hospitals, one nursing home and one home health agency. As a result of these sales and the efforts to improve operations of our remaining three hospitals, two nursing homes and our Specialty Pharmacy Segment, the Company has reduced its debt from $29,021 at June 30, 2012 to $12,045 at June 30, 2015, and added approximately $15,500 to its working capital over the three year period.

Even though the Company’s financial position has improved, we believe our ability to compete for acquisitions is still limited. However, during the last fiscal year, we have evaluated certain rural and exurban healthcare facilities, pharmacy operations and businesses which were for sale, monitored other selected acquisition targets which we believed might become available for sale, and considered the feasibility of developing future healthcare services and facilities on property we own. Although we have no current plans to do so, from time to time we may consider the acquisition of other complementary based healthcare businesses, outside of our existing business segments, which are or may become available for acquisition.

At its Board of Directors meeting on February 9, 2015, the Board discussed the Company’s future and strategic alternatives. No action was taken on future and strategic alternatives other than the Board determined that the Company should discontinue pursuing its previously announced going-private strategy at this time.

Historically, we have targeted the rural or exurban community hospital market because we believed it provided an attractive sector for investment in healthcare facilities. We continue to believe hospitals and other selected healthcare businesses in our markets generally may experience (1) less direct competition although competition has increased substantially in recent years in each market, (2) lower managed care penetration, (3) more manageable inflationary pressure with respect to certain costs, (4) higher staff, employee and community loyalty, and (5), in certain cases, opportunities for future growth. On the other hand, rural and exurban community hospitals continue to experience, among other things, substantial out-migration by patients to urban medical centers, difficulties in recruiting physician and nursing staffs, low inpatient occupancy levels, and high proportion of government insured and of uninsured patients vs. privately insured patients. The focus of future acquisition activities will depend on our evaluation of relative opportunities for growth and profitability within the business segments and services lines of our existing operations, as well as new healthcare related businesses, our financial position, the capital needs of our existing and potential operations within such existing and potential segments and services lines, current and potential changes in government regulation and reimbursement rules, competition for potential acquisitions and valuations of existing or potential new healthcare related facilities and operations and other factors.

Extensive competition exists for healthcare facility acquisitions, primarily from for-profit management companies and not-for-profit entities which may have greater financial and other resources than SunLink. Competition for the acquisition of non-urban acute care hospitals, related services (such as physician clinics and practices), and other healthcare facilities could have an adverse effect on our ability to acquire such healthcare businesses on favorable terms or at all.

Healthcare Facilities Operations

SunLink’s Healthcare Facilities Segment is composed of two operational areas:

6

Owned Hospitals

All of our hospitals are owned and operated by our subsidiaries. The following sets forth certain information with respect to each of the three community hospitals:

A subsidiary also owns the Careside Medical Park (“Careside”) located in Clanton, Chilton County, Alabama which is composed of a hospital and medical office buildings which are currently vacant except for two offices rented by a physician and a testing lab.

Hospital Operations

Utilization of Local Hospital Management Teams

We believe that the long-term potential of our subsidiary hospitals is dependent on their ability to offer appropriate healthcare services and effectively recruit and retain employees and physicians. Each subsidiary hospital has developed and continuously seeks to implement an operating plan designed to improve efficiency and increase revenue including, but not limited to, the expansion of services offered by the hospital and the recruitment of physicians to the community.

Each subsidiary hospital management team is comprised of a chief executive officer, chief financial officer and chief nursing officer. The quality of the on-site hospital management team is critical to the success of our hospitals. The on-site management team is responsible for implementing the operating plan under the guidance of the board of directors for the applicable subsidiary. Each subsidiary hospital management team participates in a performance-based compensation program based upon the achievement of operational, clinical and financial goals set forth in the operating plan.

Each subsidiary hospital management team is responsible for the day-to-day operations of its hospital. Each subsidiary has access to support services, assistance, and advice in certain areas, including strategic planning and physician recruiting, supplies and equipment purchasing, corporate compliance, reimbursement, information systems, human resources, accounting, cash management, capital financing, tax and insurance, some of which may be provided by SunLink or other SunLink subsidiaries. Financial controls are maintained through the utilization of policies and procedures and monitoring by the subsidiary board of directors.

Expansion of Services and Facilities

Each subsidiary hospital seeks to add services on an as-needed basis in order to improve access to quality healthcare services in the communities it serves, with the ultimate goal of reducing the out-migration of patients to other hospitals or alternate service providers. Additional and expanded services and programs, which may include specialty inpatient and outpatient services, are often dependent on recruiting physicians and other healthcare professionals; therefore recruiting goals are important to our ability to expand services. Capital

7

investments in technology and facilities are often necessary to increase the quality and scope of services provided to the communities and to add to each subsidiary hospital’s reputation in the community, reducing out-migration and increasing patient referrals and revenue. Each hospital endeavors to provide a quality, patient-friendly emergency room, urgent care clinic or rural health clinic as a critical component of its local service offering and which is intended to function as each facility’s “window to the community”.

Medical Staff

The number and quality of physicians affiliated with a hospital directly affects the quality and availability of patient care and the reputation of the hospital. Physicians generally may terminate their affiliation with a hospital at any time. Each subsidiary hospital seeks to retain primary care physicians of varied specialties on its medical staff to attract other qualified physicians. Physicians generally refer patients to a hospital primarily on the basis of the perceived quality of services the hospital renders to patients and physicians; the quality of other physicians on the medical staff; the location of the hospital; and the quality of the hospital’s facilities, equipment and employees. Accordingly, each subsidiary hospital strives to provide suitable facilities, equipment, employees and services for physicians and their patients.

Recruiting Physicians and Healthcare Professionals

Each subsidiary hospital management team is responsible for assessing the need for additional physicians and other healthcare professionals including the number and specialty of additional physicians needed by the hospital’s community. Each local hospital management team, with the assistance of outside recruiting firms, identifies and seeks to attract specific physicians to its hospital’s medical staff and other hospital professionals to work under the direction of staff physicians. Increasingly, each of our subsidiary hospitals has employed physicians to better align physician performance with hospital goals through employment relationships. Many hospitals and hospital systems are attempting to improve clinical and financial results by employing physicians. For newly recruited non-employed physicians, the hospital may guarantee such physicians a minimum level of gross receipts during an initial period, generally one year, and assist the physician’s transition into the community. The physician is required to repay some or all of the amounts paid under such guarantee if the physician leaves the community within a specified period. Currently, 14 physicians are employed by our subsidiary hospitals and one is under a physician guarantee contract. Each hospital periodically evaluates each physician and may terminate employment based on performance and the needs of each facility. Physician recruiting has become more challenging, and will continue to remain challenging due to various factors including healthcare reform and market forces, including competition for physicians. The costs of recruiting and retaining physicians are also expected increase as more physicians are employed and salaries and support costs continue to increase.

Quality Assurance

Each hospital implements quality assurance procedures to monitor the level and quality of care provided to its patients. Each hospital has a medical director who supervises and is responsible for the quality of medical care provided and a medical advisory committee comprised of physicians who review the professional credentials of physicians applying for medical staff privileges at the hospital. The medical advisory committee also reviews and monitors surgical outcomes along with procedures performed and the quality of the logistical, medical and technological support provided to the physicians. Each subsidiary hospital periodically conducts surveys of its patients, either during their stay at the hospital or subsequently, to identify potential areas of improvement. Each hospital is accredited by the JCAHO.

8

Operating Statistics

The following table sets forth certain operating statistics for SunLink’s healthcare facility subsidiaries included in continuing operations as of June 30 for the periods indicated.

Sources of Revenue

Each subsidiary hospital receives payments for patient care from federal Medicare programs, State Medicaid programs, private insurance carriers, health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations, TriCare, and from employers and patients directly. Medicare is a federal program that provides certain hospital and medical insurance benefits to persons age 65 and over, some disabled persons and persons with end-stage renal disease. Medicaid is a federal-state program, administered by the states, that provides hospital and nursing home benefits to qualifying individuals who are unable to afford care. All of SunLink subsidiary hospitals are certified as healthcare services providers for persons covered by Medicare and Medicaid programs. TriCare is a federal program for the healthcare of certain U.S. military personnel and their dependants. See “Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.

9

The following table sets forth the percentage of patient days from various payors in SunLink’s healthcare facilities for the periods indicated.

The following table sets forth the percentage of the net patient revenues from major payors in SunLink’s hospitals.

Patients generally are not responsible for any difference between established hospital charges and amounts reimbursed for such services under Medicare, Medicaid and some private insurer plans, health maintenance organization (“HMO”) plans and preferred provider organizations (“PPO”) plans, but are responsible to the extent of any exclusions, deductibles or co-insurance features of their coverage. The amount of such exclusions, deductibles and co-insurance has been increasing in recent years. Collection of amounts due from individuals typically is more difficult than from governmental or third-party payors. Further, amounts received under the Medicare and Medicaid programs generally are significantly less than the established charges of most hospitals, including our own, for the services provided. Likewise, HMOs and PPOs generally seek and obtain discounts from the established charges of most hospitals. See “Item 1. Business—Government Reimbursement Programs—Medicare/Medicaid Reimbursement”.

Competition

Among the factors which we believe influence patient selection among hospitals in our subsidiary hospital markets are:

Such factors are influenced heavily by the quality and scope of medical services, strength of referral networks, hospital location and the price of hospital services. Our hospitals may face less competition in their immediate patient service areas than would be expected in larger communities because they are the primary provider of healthcare services in their respective communities. However, our subsidiary hospitals face competition from larger tertiary care centers and, in most cases, other rural, exurban, suburban or, in limited circumstances, urban hospitals, some of which offer more specialized services. The competing hospitals may be owned by governmental agencies or not-for-profit entities supported by endowments and charitable contributions and may be able to finance capital expenditures on a tax-exempt basis. Such governmental-owned and not-for-

10

profit hospitals, as well as various for-profit hospitals operating in the broader service area of our subsidiary hospitals, likely have greater access to financial resources than do our subsidiary hospitals.

Managed Care

Each subsidiary hospital is affected by its ability to negotiate service contracts with purchasers of group healthcare services. HMOs and PPOs attempt to direct and control the use of hospital services through managed care programs. In addition, employers and traditional health insurers increasingly are seeking to contain costs through negotiations with hospitals for managed care programs and discounts from established charges. Generally, hospitals compete for service contracts with group healthcare service purchasers on the basis of market reputation, geographic location, quality and range of services, quality of medical staff, convenience and price.

The importance of obtaining contracts with managed care organizations varies from market to market, depending on the market strength of such organizations. Nevertheless, a significant portion of hospital patients in our communities in which our subsidiary hospitals operate are covered by managed care or other reimbursement programs, all of which generally pay less than established charges for hospital services.

The healthcare industry as a whole faces the challenge of continuing to provide quality patient care while managing rising costs, facing strong competition for patients, and adjusting to a continued general reduction of reimbursement rates by both private and government payors. Both private and government payors continually seek to reduce the nature and scope of services which may be reimbursed. Healthcare reform at both the federal and state level generally has created pressure to reduce reimbursement rates. Changes in medical technology, existing and future legislation, regulations and interpretations, and competitive contracting for provider services by private and government payors, have required and in the future may further require changes in our facilities, equipment, personnel, rates and/or services.

Efforts to Control Healthcare Costs

Rural hospitals including all of the hospitals owned and operated by SunLink’s subsidiaries continue to have significant unused capacity. Inpatient utilization and average inpatient occupancy rates continue to be affected negatively by payor-required pre-admission authorization, utilization review, and payment mechanisms designed to maximize outpatient and alternative healthcare delivery services for less acutely ill patients and to limit the cost of treating inpatients. Admissions constraints, payor pressures, and increased competition are likely to continue. Historically hospitals owned and operated by SunLink’s subsidiaries have responded to such trends by adding and expanding outpatient services, upgrading facilities and equipment, offering new programs (such as geriatric psychiatric units) and adding or expanding certain inpatient and ancillary services. In addition, our hospitals have reduced services and taken beds out of service in response to such trends. Currently we expect our subsidiaries’ hospitals will continue to respond to such trends in a similar manner subject to the availability of capital resources and our evaluation of the continued utility of such historical responses.

Health Care Reform

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the “Affordable Care Act” or “ACA”) were signed into law by President Obama on March 23, 2010, and March 30, 2010, respectively. The ACA alters the United States health care system and is intended to decrease the number of uninsured Americans and reduce overall health care costs. The ACA attempts to achieve these goals by, among other things, requiring most Americans to obtain health insurance or pay a tax penalty, expanding Medicare and Medicaid eligibility, reducing Medicare and Medicaid payments including disproportionate share payments, expanding the Medicare program’s use of value-based purchasing programs, tying hospital payments to the satisfaction of certain quality criteria, and bundling payments to hospitals and other providers. The ACA also contains a number of measures that are intended to reduce fraud and abuse in the

11

Medicare and Medicaid programs, such as requiring the use of recovery audit contractors in the Medicaid program and generally prohibiting physician-owned hospitals from adding new physician owners or increasing the number of beds and operating rooms for which they are licensed. We believe the implementation or interpretation of rules and regulations or the provisions of the ACA may have and may continue to have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of our operations, especially since the three states in which we operate hospitals have decided not to set up state exchanges and not to expand Medicaid.

Government Reimbursement Programs

A significant portion of SunLink’s healthcare facilities net revenues are dependent upon reimbursement to our subsidiaries’ hospitals from Medicare and Medicaid. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services or “CMS” is the federal agency which administers Medicare, Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (“CHIP”). The federal government generally reviews payment rates under its various programs annually, and changes in reimbursement rates under such programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, generally occur based on the fiscal year of the federal government which currently begins on October 1 and ends on September 30 of each year.

Medicare Inpatient Reimbursement

The Medicare program currently pays hospitals under the provisions of a prospective payment system for most inpatient services. Under the inpatient prospective payment system, a hospital receives a fixed amount for inpatient hospital services based on the established fixed payment amount per discharge for categories of hospital treatment, known as diagnosis related groups (“DRGs”). Each patient admitted for care is assigned to a DRG based upon a primary admitting diagnosis. Every DRG is assigned a payment rate by the government based upon the estimated intensity of hospital resources necessary to treat the average patient with that particular diagnosis. DRG payments do not consider a specific hospital’s costs, but are national rates adjusted for area wage differentials and case-mix indices.

DRG rates are usually adjusted by an update factor each federal fiscal year (“FFY”). The percentage increases to DRG payment rates for the last several years have been lower than the percentage increases in the related cost of goods and services provided by general hospitals. The index used to adjust the DRG payment rates is based on a price statistic, known as the CMS Market Basket Index, reduced by congressionally mandated reduction factors and other factors imposed by CMS.

DRG rate increases were 0.7% and 1.4% for FFY 2014 and 2015, respectively, and currently is 0.9% for FFY 2016. The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 originally set the increase in DRG payment rates for future FFYs at rates that would be based on the market basket index, which in certain years have been, and in the future may be, subject to reduction factors. If the update factor does not adequately reflect increases in the cost of providing inpatient services by our subsidiaries’ hospitals, our financial condition or results of operations could be negatively affected.

The ACA combined with the America Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (“ATRA”) and the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (“MARA”) made a number of changes to Medicare which include but are not limited to:

12

Each of SunLink’s subsidiaries’ hospitals is an eligible hospital under one or more provisions of ACA, ATRA and MARA.

Medicare Outpatient Reimbursement

Most outpatient services provided by general hospitals are reimbursed by Medicare under the outpatient prospective payment system. This outpatient prospective payment system is based on a system of Ambulatory Payment Classifications (“APC”). Each APC is designed to represent a “bundle” of outpatient services, and each APC is assigned a fully prospective reimbursement rate. Medicare pays a set price or rate for each APC group, regardless of the actual cost incurred in providing care. Each APC rate generally is subject to adjustment each year by an “update factor” based on a market basket of services index. For calendar year 2014, the update factor was 2.0% and for calendar year 2015 it is 2.4%. For calendar year 2016 is expected to be 1.1%. If the update factor for current and future periods does not adequately reflect increases in SunLink’s subsidiaries’ hospitals’ cost of providing outpatient services, our financial condition or results of operations could be negatively affected.

Medicare Bad Debt Reimbursement

Under Medicare, the costs attributable to the deductible and coinsurance amounts that remain unpaid by Medicare beneficiaries can be partially added to, and reimbursed as a portion of, the Medicare share of allowable costs as cost reports are filed. Hospitals generally receive interim pass-through payments during the cost report year which are determined by the respective Medicare Audit Contractor (“MAC”) from the prior cost report filing, and which are finally adjusted when cost reports are filed and audited.

Bad debts must meet the following criteria to be allowable: the debt must be related to covered services and derived from deductible and coinsurance amounts; the provider must be able to establish that reasonable collection efforts were made; the provider must be able to show the debt was actually uncollectible when claimed as worthless; and the provider must be able to show sound business judgment established that there was no likelihood of recovery at any time in the future.

Amounts uncollectible from specific beneficiaries are charged off as bad debts in the accounting period in which the accounts are deemed to be worthless. In some cases, an amount previously written off as a bad debt and allocated to the program may be recovered in a subsequent accounting period. In these cases, the recoveries must be used to reduce the cost of beneficiary services for the period in which the collection is made. In determining reasonable costs for hospitals, the amount of bad debts otherwise treated as allowable costs was reduced by 35% beginning FFY 2014. Under the Medicare bad debt reimbursement provisions, our subsidiaries’ hospitals received an aggregate of approximately $1,261, $1,018 and $1,164 for 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively. Our hospitals reported an aggregate amount of Medicare bad debt reimbursements of approximately $1,671 for 2014. The 2013 and 2014 reported amounts are subject to final settlement of the fiscal year 2013 and 2014 cost reports.

13

Medicare Disproportionate Share Payments

In addition to the standard DRG payment, the Social Security Act requires that additional Medicare payments be made to hospitals with a disproportionate share of low income patients. Beneficiary Improvement and Protection Act (“BIPA”) provisions stipulate that rural facilities with fewer than 100 beds with a disproportionate share percentage greater than 15% will be classified as a disproportionate share hospital entitled to receive a supplemental disproportionate share payment based on gross DRG payments. Since April 1, 2004, the effective rate has been 12.0% of DRG payments. All of our subsidiaries’ hospitals were classified as disproportionate share hospitals at June 30, 2014. The Affordable Care Act provides for material reductions in Medicare DSH funding. We estimate that Medicare disproportionate share payments represented approximately 1% of our net patient service revenues for the years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

Medicaid Inpatient and Outpatient Reimbursement

Each state operates a Medicaid program funded jointly by the state and the federal government. Federal law governs the general management of the Medicaid program, but there is wide latitude for states to customize Medicaid programs to fit local needs and resources. As a result, each state Medicaid plan has its own payment formula and recipient eligibility criteria.

In the recent past, the states in which our subsidiaries operate hospitals have initiated increased efforts to reduce Medicaid assistance payments. These efforts and reductions often are triggered by one or more of the following factors: an increased effort by CMS to decrease the federal share of payments for Medicaid beneficiaries or significant increases in program utilization resulting from increased enrollment or budgetary pressures on the applicable states. The federal government’s percentage share of each state’s medical assistance expenditures under Medicaid is determined by a formula specified in Medicaid law referred to as the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (“FMAP”).

The states in which SunLink subsidiaries operate hospitals have implemented initiatives to decrease the Medicaid funds paid to providers. Medicaid pays providers for inpatient services in a manner similar to the Medicare prospective payment system in that hospitals receive a fixed fee for inpatient hospital services based on the established fixed payment amount per discharge for categories of hospital treatment, also known as DRGs. These Medicaid DRG payments do not consider a specific hospital’s costs, but are statewide rates adjusted for each subsidiaries’ hospitals’ capital cost allotment.

Medicaid outpatient services are reimbursed with interim rates based on a facility specific cost to charge ratio. These interim payments are then adjusted subsequent to the end of the cost reporting period to an amount equal to 85.6% of the costs associated with providing care to the Medicaid outpatient population.

In 2006, Georgia implemented a Medicaid HMO program and awarded contracts to private companies for the management and processing of certain Medicaid claims. The intent of the Medicaid HMO program is to curtail utilization and reduce rates paid by the State of Georgia. All of SunLink’s facilities that operate in the state of Georgia have secured contracts with all the HMO companies contracted by the state in their respective regions. Since the implementation of the Medicaid HMO program, all Georgia hospitals receive reimbursement from three different contractors instead of a single source. The contractors utilize the same payment rates. For outpatient services, hospitals operated by SunLink subsidiaries in Georgia have contracts with the three HMO vendors and services are reimbursed at 102% of the current interim rate as determined by the Georgia Department of Community Health.

If SunLink or our subsidiaries or any of their facilities were found to be in violation of federal or state laws relating to Medicare, Medicaid or similar programs, SunLink or the applicable subsidiary or facility could be subject to substantial monetary fines, civil penalties and exclusion from future participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Any such sanctions could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

14

Adoption of Electronic Health Records

Electronic Health Records (“EHR”) incentive reimbursements are payments received under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (the “HITECH Act”) which was enacted into law in 2009 as part of ARRA. The HITECH Act includes provisions designed to increase the use of EHR by both physicians and hospitals. Beginning with federal fiscal year 2011 and extending through federal fiscal year 2016, eligible hospitals participating in the Medicare and Medicaid programs are eligible for reimbursement incentives based on successfully demonstrating meaningful use of their certified EHR technology. Conversely, those hospitals that do not successfully demonstrate meaningful use of EHR technology are subject to payment penalties or downward adjustments to their Medicare payments beginning in federal fiscal year 2015.

The Company accounts for EHR incentive payments in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 450-30, “Gain Contingencies” (“ASC 450-30”). In accordance with ASC 450-30, the Company recognizes a gain for EHR incentive payments when the applicable eligible subsidiary hospital has demonstrated meaningful use of certified EHR technology for the applicable period and when the cost report information needed for the full cost report year used for the final calculation of the EHR incentive reimbursement payment is available. The demonstration of meaningful use is based on meeting a series of objectives and varies among hospitals, between the Medicare and Medicaid programs, and within the Medicaid program from state to state. Additionally, meeting the series of objectives in order to demonstrate meaningful use becomes progressively more stringent as its implementation is phased in through stages as outlined by the CMS.

Attestation of Medicare meaningful use requirements was successful for each of SunLink’s hospital subsidiaries’ and certain discontinued operations for fiscal years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. SunLink’s hospital subsidiaries have also successfully attested to the meaningful use requirements for the Medicaid program for continuing and certain discontinued operations for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013. EHR incentive payments received were as follows:

The amounts in the table above represent actual funds received from meeting the meaningful use requirements for Medicare and Medicaid programs. The discontinued operations Medicare funds received in fiscal 2015 were for attestation of the meaningful use requirements in fiscal 2014. Amounts recognized may differ due to year-end adjustments and final settlement of cost reports.

The Company received no Medicare meaningful use payments in continuing operations in 2015 because, based on its cost-benefit evaluation, it chose not to attest for such payments. We currently believe we will receive no Medicare incentive payments and minimal Medicaid incentive payments in future years.

15

Government Reimbursement Program Administration and Adjustments

The Medicare, Medicaid and TriCare programs are subject to statutory and regulatory changes, administrative rulings, interpretations and determinations, requirements for utilization review and changing governmental funding restrictions, all of which may materially increase or decrease program payments as well as affect the cost of providing services and the timing of payments under such programs.

All hospitals participating in the Medicare and Medicaid programs are required to meet certain financial reporting requirements. Federal and, where applicable, state regulations require the submission of annual cost reports covering the revenues, costs and expenses associated with the services provided by each subsidiary hospital to Medicare beneficiaries and Medicaid recipients.

Annual cost reports required under the Medicare and Medicaid programs are subject to routine audits which may result in adjustments to the amounts ultimately determined to be due under these reimbursement programs. These audits often require several years to reach the final determination of amounts due. Providers have rights of appeal and it is common to contest issues raised in audits. Although the final outcome of these audits and the nature and amounts of any adjustments are difficult to predict, we believe that we have made adequate provisions in our financial statements for adjustments that may result from these audits and that final resolution of any contested issues should not have a material adverse effect upon our financial condition or results of operations. Until final adjustment, however, significant issues may remain unresolved and previously determined allowances could become either inadequate or greater than ultimately required.

In 2005, CMS began using recovery audit contractors (“RACs”) to detect Medicare overpayments not identified through existing claims review mechanisms. The RAC program relies on private companies to examine Medicare claims filed by healthcare providers. The RAC program was made permanent by the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006. The ACA expanded the RAC program’s scope to include managed Medicare and Medicaid claims, and required all states to establish programs to contract with RACs by 2011. Currently all states where our subsidiaries operate have RAC programs, and all their facilities have had requests from the various RACs to review claims.

RACs perform post-discharge audits of medical records to identify Medicare overpayments resulting from incorrect payment amounts, non-covered services, incorrectly coded services, and duplicate services. CMS has given RACs the authority to look back at claims up to three years old, provided that the claim was paid on or after October 1, 2007. Claims review strategies used by RACs generally include a review of high dollar claims, including inpatient hospital claims. As a result, a large majority of the total amounts recovered by RACs has come from hospitals. Claims identified as overpayments are subject to an appeals process and the Company’s hospitals routinely appeal RAC overpayment determinations. Under the RAC program, SunLink has experienced losses in the aggregate from audit adjustments of approximately $86, $153 and $235 for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

RACs are paid a contingency fee based on the overpayments they identify and collect. We expect that the RACs will continue to look closely at claims submitted by our subsidiaries’ facilities in an attempt to identify possible overpayments. Although we believe the claims for reimbursement submitted to the Medicare program are accurate, we cannot predict the results of any future RAC audits.

In addition, CMS employs Medicaid Integrity Contractors (“MICs”) to perform post-payment audits of Medicaid claims and identify overpayments. The ACA increases federal funding for the MIC program for federal fiscal year 2011 and later years. In addition to RACs and MICs, the state Medicaid agencies and other contractors have also increased their review activities.

16

SPECIALTY PHARMACY OPERATIONS

Our Specialty Pharmacy Segment is operated through SunLink ScriptsRx, LLC (“ScriptsRx”), a wholly-owned subsidiary, and composed of four material service lines:

The major conditions these drugs treat include, but are not limited to: respiratory system weakness, cancer, HIV/AIDS, hemophilia, hepatitis C, multiple sclerosis, infertility, Crohn’s disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and growth hormone deficiency.

Government Reimbursement Programs

Our Specialty Pharmacy Business is subject to certain rules implemented by the Medicare Modernization Act (“MMA”) and, in the future may be subject to other rules previously implemented by MMA with respect to urban providers. Regulations implementing cost containment mandates under MMA reduced the reimbursement for healthcare providers in urban areas for a number of products and services which are also provided by our pharmacy operations and established a competitive bidding program for certain durable medical equipment provided under Medicare Part B in urban areas. Competitive bidding is intended to further reduce reimbursement for certain products and will likely decrease the number of companies permitted to serve Medicare beneficiaries in the competitive bidding areas (“CBAs”). CMS had planned to implement the competitive bidding program for Medicare durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (“DMEPOS”) products and services with the goal of offering beneficiaries access to quality with lower out-of-pocket costs. Our ScriptsRx operations were exempted under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 from the proposed competitive acquisition program for DMEPOS, but we cannot be sure such exemption will continue to be available in the future or that the program, if expanded in the future, would be expanded in its original form. If the program is expanded in the future, loss of the exemption could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. In 2011, Medicare implemented the program in select limited areas of the country, and, in 2013, expanded to additional areas. Currently, the areas affected do not include the primary service areas of ScriptsRx. Whether or not the program will be further expanded in the future is unknown.

17

The MMA also created a Medicare prescription drug benefit (which began in 2006) and a prescription drug card program. Final rules implementing the portions of the MMA relating to the prescription drug benefit were adopted in 2005.

Under MMA Medicare Part B, covered drugs and biological products generally are paid based on the average sales price (“ASP”) methodology. The ASP methodology uses quarterly drug pricing data submitted to CMS by drug manufacturers. CMS will supply contractors with the ASP drug pricing files for Medicare Part B drugs on a quarterly basis. Principal products paid under the ASP methodology include certain oncology and renal dialysis drugs. Although, there are exceptions to this general rule which are listed in the latest ASP quarterly change request document and which exceptions generally are paid on a cost basis, such exceptions have not been and are not expected to be material to our operations.

Beginning in January 2008, CMS’s outpatient prospective payment system began paying for most separately payable Medicare Part B drugs administered in a hospital outpatient setting at a reimbursement level of ASP plus 5% and ASP plus 6% in other settings. Such outpatient price represented a decrease from ASP plus 6%.

Section 303(d) of the MMA also requires the implementation of a competitive acquisition program (the “Part B CAP”) for Medicare Part B drugs and biologicals not paid on a cost or prospective payment system basis. The Part B CAP is an alternative to the ASP methodology for acquiring certain Part B drugs which are administered incident to a physician’s services. Currently, the Part B CAP is a voluntary program that offers physicians the option to acquire many injectable and infused drugs they use in their practice from an approved Part B CAP vendor, thus reducing the time and cost of buying and billing for drugs. Currently, the CAP for Part B Drugs and Biologicals is only for injectable and infused drugs currently billed under Part B that are administered in a physician’s office, “incident to” a physician’s service.

In late 2005, CMS conducted the first round of bidding for approved Part B CAP vendors. The Part B CAP was implemented on July 1, 2006. The 2009-2011 CAP vendor bidding period concluded on February 15, 2008. CMS received several qualified bids; however, contractual issues with the successful bidders resulted in the 2009 program being postponed by CMS in September 2008. As a result, CAP drugs were not available from an approved CAP vendor for dates of service after December 31, 2008.

At least one Medicaid program has adopted, and other Medicaid programs, some states and some private payors may be expected to adopt, those aspects of the MMA that either result in or appear to result in price reductions for drugs covered by such programs. Adoption of ASP as the measure for determining reimbursement by Medicare and Medicaid programs for additional drugs sold by our specialty pharmacy operations could reduce revenue and gross margins and could materially affect our current average wholesale price (“AWP”) based reimbursement structure with private payors.

We cannot assure you that the ASP reimbursement methodology will not be extended to the provision of all specialty pharmaceuticals or to the specialty pharmaceuticals most often sold by our ScriptsRx specialty pharmacy operations or that ScriptsRx will be able to operate its specialty pharmacy operations profitably at either existing or at lower reimbursement rates. Likewise, we cannot assure you that the Part B CAP program will not be extended to rural or exurban areas in general or to the areas in which it operates, or may seek to operate, in particular or that ScriptsRx would be able to meet the qualifications to become a Part B CAP vendor either now or at any time in the future.

Competition

There are many companies which provide one or more of the healthcare operations which comprise or may compete with our specialty pharmacy operations of ScriptsRx. For example, home healthcare business companies, which may compete with our specialty pharmacy services, our durable medical equipment services operations or both, range in size from small entrepreneurial companies to rapidly expanding companies with

18

strategies for national operations, such as Amedisys, Inc., Apria Healthcare Group, Inc., Kindred Healthcare, Inc., and Walgreen Co. Specialty pharmacy companies range from local or regional pharmacies to large public companies, such as CVS Health Corporation (CVS CarePlus) Express Scripts (Accredo Health Group, Inc.), Walgreen Co. and BioScript Inc. Institutional pharmacy companies likewise range from local or regional pharmacies to large public companies including Omnicare, Inc. and PharMerica Corporation.

Healthcare Regulation

Overview

The healthcare industry is governed by an extremely complex framework of federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations, and there continue to be federal and state proposals that would, and actions that do, impose limitations on government and private payments to providers, including community hospitals. In addition, there regularly are proposals to increase co-payments and deductibles from program and private patients. Hospital facilities also are affected by controls imposed by government and private payors designed to reduce admissions and lengths of stay. Such controls include what is commonly referred to as “utilization review”. Utilization review entails the review of a patient’s admission and course of treatment by a third party. Historically, utilization review has resulted in a decrease in certain treatments and procedures being performed. Utilization review is required in connection with the provision of care which is to be funded by Medicare and Medicaid and is also required under many managed care arrangements.

Many states have enacted, or are considering enacting, additional measures that are designed to reduce their Medicaid expenditures and to make changes to private healthcare insurance. Various states have applied, or are considering applying, for a waiver from current Medicaid regulations in order to allow them to serve some of their Medicaid participants through managed care providers. These proposals also may attempt to include coverage for some people who presently are uninsured, and generally could have the effect of reducing payments to hospitals, physicians and other providers for the same level of service provided under Medicaid.

Healthcare Facility Regulation

Certificate of Need Requirements

A number of states require approval for the purchase, construction or expansion of various healthcare facilities, including findings of need for additional or expanded healthcare facilities or services. Certificates of Need (“CONs”), which are issued by governmental agencies with jurisdiction over applicable healthcare facilities, are at times required for capital expenditures exceeding a prescribed amount, changes in bed capacity or the addition of services and certain other matters. Both states in which SunLink subsidiaries currently operate hospitals (Georgia and Mississippi) have CON laws that apply to such facilities. The two states (Georgia and Mississippi) in which SunLink subsidiaries currently operate nursing homes/skilled nursing facilities also have CON laws that apply to nursing homes and other skilled nursing facilities. States periodically review, modify and revise their CON laws and related regulations.

SunLink is unable to predict whether its subsidiaries’ healthcare facilities will be able to obtain any CONs that may be necessary to accomplish their business objectives in any jurisdiction where such certificates of need are required. Violation of these state laws may result in the imposition of civil sanctions or the revocation of licenses for such facilities. In addition, future healthcare facility acquisitions also may occur in states that require CONs.

Future healthcare facility acquisitions also may occur in states that do not require CONs or which have less stringent CON requirements than the states in which SunLink subsidiaries currently operate healthcare facilities. Any healthcare facility operated by SunLink in such states may face increased competition from new or expanding facilities operated by competitors, including physicians.

19

Utilization Review Compliance and Hospital Governance

Healthcare facilities are subject to, and comply with, various forms of utilization review. In addition, under the Medicare prospective payment system, each state must have a peer review organization to carry out a federally mandated system of review of Medicare patient admissions, treatments and discharges in hospitals. Medical and surgical services and physician practices are supervised by committees of staff doctors at each healthcare facility, are overseen by each healthcare facility’s local governing board, the primary voting members of which are physicians and community members, and are reviewed by quality assurance personnel. The local governing boards also help maintain standards for quality care, develop long-range plans, establish, review and enforce practices and procedures and approve the credentials and disciplining of medical staff members.

Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act

The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (“EMTALA”) is a federal law that requires any hospital that participates in the Medicare program to conduct an appropriate medical screening examination of every person who presents to the hospital’s emergency department for treatment and, if the patient is suffering from an emergency medical condition or is in active labor, to either stabilize that condition or make an appropriate transfer of the patient to a facility that can handle the condition. The obligation to screen and stabilize emergency medical conditions exists regardless of a patient’s ability to pay for treatment. There are severe penalties under EMTALA if a hospital fails to screen or appropriately stabilize or transfer a patient or if the hospital delays appropriate treatment in order to first inquire about the patient’s ability to pay. Penalties for violations of EMTALA include civil monetary penalties and exclusion from participation in the Medicare program, the Medicaid program or both. In addition, an injured patient, the patient’s family or a medical facility that suffers a financial loss as a direct result of another hospital’s violation of the law can bring a civil suit against that other hospital. Although we believe that our subsidiaries’ hospitals comply with EMTALA, we cannot predict whether CMS will implement new requirements in the future and whether our subsidiaries’ hospitals will be able to comply with any new requirements.

Specialty Pharmacy Segment Regulation

Overview

Much like our subsidiaries’ healthcare facility operations, the operations of our Specialty Pharmacy Segment subsidiary are subject to various federal and state statutes and regulations governing their operations, including laws and regulations with respect to operation of pharmacies, repackaging of drug products, wholesale distribution, dispensing of controlled substances, cross-jurisdictional sale and distribution of pharmacy products, medical waste disposal, clinical trials and non-discriminatory access. Federal statutes and regulations govern the labeling, packaging, advertising and adulteration of prescription drugs, as well as the dispensing of controlled substances. Federal controlled substance laws require us to register our pharmacies and repackaging facilities with the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) and to comply with security, recordkeeping, inventory control and labeling standards in order to dispense controlled substances. Although we believe that the operations of our Specialty Pharmacy Segment have obtained the permits and/or licenses required to conduct its specialty pharmacy business as currently conducted, a failure to have the necessary permits and licenses could have a material adverse effect on its specialty pharmacy business, and our financial condition or results of operations.

Pharmaceutical Distribution

ScriptsRx conducts the operations of our Specialty Pharmacy Segment. In addition to walk-in customers at its retail centers, it distributes pharmaceuticals through a variety of delivery methods, including by mail and express delivery services. Many states in which ScriptsRx delivers or may seek to deliver pharmaceuticals have laws and regulations that require out-of-state mail service pharmacies to register with, or be licensed by, the boards of pharmacy or similar regulatory bodies in those states. These states generally permit the dispensing pharmacy to follow the laws of the state within which the dispensing pharmacy is located.

20

However, various state Medicaid programs have enacted laws and/or adopted rules or regulations directed at restricting or prohibiting the operation of out-of-state pharmacies by, among other things, requiring compliance with all laws of the states into which the out-of-state pharmacy dispenses medications, whether or not those laws conflict with the laws of the state in which the pharmacy is located, or requiring the pharmacist-in-charge to be licensed in that state. To the extent that such laws or regulations are found to be applicable to ScriptsRx’s specialty pharmacy operations, we believe its specialty pharmacy operations comply with them in all material respects. To the extent that any of the foregoing laws or regulations prohibit or restrict the operation of mail service pharmacies and are found to be applicable to ScriptsRx specialty pharmacy operations, they could have an adverse effect on its ability to expand our pharmacy operations, which currently are concentrated in Louisiana. A number of state Medicaid programs prohibit the participation in such state’s Medicare program by either out-of-state retail pharmacies or mail order pharmacies, whether located in-state or out-of-state.

Advertising and Marketing Regulations

There are also other statutes and regulations which may affect advertising, marketing and distribution of pharmacy products. The Federal Trade Commission requires mail order sellers of goods generally to engage in truthful advertising, to stock a reasonable supply of the products to be sold, to fill mail orders within 30 days, and to provide clients with refunds, when appropriate.

Healthcare Regulations of General Application

Licensing Requirements

Healthcare operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local licensing requirements. In order for our subsidiaries’ healthcare facilities to maintain their operating licenses, such healthcare facility operations must comply with strict standards concerning medical care, physical plant, equipment and hygiene. Various licenses and permits also are required in order to handle radioactive materials and operate certain equipment. All licenses, provider numbers, and other permits or approvals required to perform our business operations are held by individual subsidiaries of SunLink. Each of the hospital operating subsidiaries operates only a single hospital. SunLink’s four subsidiary owned hospitals are accredited by the JCAHO.

Drugs and Controlled Substances

Various licenses and permits are required by our subsidiaries’ healthcare facilities and by ScriptsRx’s specialty pharmacy operations in order to dispense narcotics and operate pharmacies. All of our subsidiaries are required to register our pharmacy operations for permits and/or licenses with, and comply with certain operating and security standards of, the United States DEA, the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), state Boards of Pharmacy, state health departments and other state agencies in states where we operate or may seek to operate.

State controlled substance laws require registration and compliance with state pharmacy licensure, registration or permit standards promulgated by the state’s pharmacy licensing authority. Such standards often address the qualification of an applicant’s personnel, the adequacy of its prescription fulfillment and inventory control practices and the adequacy of its facilities. In general, pharmacy licenses are renewed annually. Pharmacists and pharmacy technicians employed at each of our dispensing locations also must satisfy applicable state licensing requirements.

21

Fraud and Abuse, Anti-Kickback and Self-Referral Regulations

Participation in the Medicare and/or Medicaid programs is heavily regulated by federal statutes and regulations. If a hospital fails to comply substantially with the numerous federal laws governing a facility’s activities, the hospital’s participation in the Medicare and/or Medicaid programs may be terminated and/or civil or criminal penalties may be imposed. For example, a hospital may lose its ability to participate in the Medicare and/or Medicaid programs if it:

Hospitals continue to be one of the primary focus areas of the Office of the Inspector General (“OIG”) of the United States and other governmental fraud and abuse programs. In January 2005, the OIG issued Supplemental Compliance Program Guidance for Hospitals that focuses on hospital compliance risk areas. Some of the risk areas highlighted by the OIG include correct outpatient procedure coding, revising admission and discharge policies to reflect current CMS rules, submitting appropriate claims for supplemental payments such as pass-through costs and outlier payments and a general discussion of the fraud and abuse risks related to financial relationships with referral sources. Each federal fiscal year, the OIG also publishes a General Work Plan that provides a brief description of the activities that the OIG plans to initiate or continue with respect to the programs and operations of Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) and details the areas that the OIG believes are prone to fraud and abuse.

Sections of the Anti-Fraud and Abuse Amendments to the Social Security Act, commonly known as the “anti-kickback” statute, prohibit certain business practices and relationships that might influence the provision and cost of healthcare services reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid, TriCare or other healthcare programs, including the payment or receipt of remuneration for the referral of patients whose care will be funded by Medicare or other government programs. Sanctions for violating the anti-kickback statute include criminal penalties and civil sanctions, including fines and possible exclusion from future participation in government programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. Pursuant to the Medicare and Medicaid Patient and Program Protection Act of 1987, HHS issued regulations that create safe harbors under the anti-kickback statute. A given business arrangement that does not fall within an enumerated safe harbor is not per se illegal; however, business arrangements that fail to satisfy the applicable safe harbor criteria are subject to increased scrutiny by enforcement authorities.

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) broadened the scope of the fraud and abuse laws by adding several criminal statutes that are not related to receipt of payments from a federal healthcare program. HIPAA created civil penalties for proscribed conduct, including upcoding and billing for medically unnecessary goods or services. These laws cover all health insurance programs, private as well as governmental. In addition, HIPAA broadened the scope of certain fraud and abuse laws, such as the anti-kickback statute, to include not just Medicare and Medicaid services, but all healthcare services reimbursed under a federal or state healthcare program. Finally, HIPAA established enforcement mechanisms to combat fraud and abuse. These mechanisms include a bounty system where a portion of the payment recovered is returned to the government agencies, as well as a whistleblower program, where a portion of the payment received is paid to the whistleblower. HIPAA also expanded the categories of persons that may be excluded from participation in federal and state healthcare programs.

22

There is increasing scrutiny by law enforcement authorities, the OIG, the courts and the U.S. Congress of arrangements between healthcare providers and potential referral sources to ensure that the arrangements are not designed as mechanisms to exchange remuneration for patient-care referrals and opportunities. Investigators also have demonstrated a willingness to look behind the formalities of a business transaction and to reinterpret the underlying purpose of payments between healthcare providers and potential referral sources. Enforcement actions have increased, as is evidenced by highly publicized enforcement investigations of certain hospital activities.

In addition, provisions of the Social Security Act, known as the Stark Act, also prohibit physicians from referring Medicare and Medicaid patients to providers of a broad range of designated health services with which the physicians or their immediate family members have ownership or certain other financial arrangements. Certain exceptions are available for employment agreements, leases, physician recruitment and certain other physician arrangements. A person making a referral, or seeking payment for services referred, in violation of the Stark Act is subject to civil monetary penalties of up to $15 for each service; restitution of any amounts received for illegally billed claims; and/or exclusion from future participation in the Medicare program, which can subject the person or entity to exclusion from future participation in state healthcare programs.

Further, if any physician or entity enters into an arrangement or scheme that the physician or entity knows or should have known has the principal purpose of assuring referrals by the physician to a particular entity, and the physician directly makes referrals to such entity, then such physician or entity could be subject to a civil monetary penalty of up to $100. In addition, the monitoring of compliance with and the enforcing of penalties for violations of these laws and regulations is changing and increasing. For example, in 2010, CMS issued a “self-referral disclosure protocol” for hospitals and other providers that wish to self-disclose potential violations of the Stark Act and attempt to resolve those potential violations and any related overpayment liabilities at levels below the maximum penalties and amounts set forth in the statute. In light of the provisions of the Affordable Care Act that created potential liabilities under the federal False Claims Act (discussed below) for failing to report and repay known overpayments and return an overpayment within sixty (60) days of the identification of the overpayment or the date by which a corresponding cost report is due, whichever is later, hospitals and other healthcare providers are encouraged to disclose potential violations of the Stark Act to CMS. It is likely that self-disclosure of Stark Act violations will increase in the future. Finally, many states have adopted or are considering similar legislative proposals, some of which extend beyond the Medicaid program, to prohibit the payment or receipt of remuneration for the referral of patients and physician self-referrals regardless of the source of the payment for the care.

The Federal False Claims Act and Similar State Laws

The Federal False Claims Act prohibits providers from, among other things, knowingly submitting false or fraudulent claims for payment to the federal government. The False Claims Act defines the term “knowingly” broadly, and while simple negligence generally will not give rise to liability, submitting a claim with reckless disregard to its truth or falsity can constitute the “knowing” submission of a false or fraudulent claim for the purposes of the False Claims Act. The “qui tam” or “whistleblower” provisions of the False Claims Act allow private individuals to bring actions under the False Claims Act on behalf of the government. These private parties are entitled to share in any amounts recovered by the government, and, as a result, the number of “whistleblower” lawsuits that have been filed against providers has increased significantly in recent years. When a private party brings a qui tam action under the False Claims Act, the defendant will generally not be aware of the lawsuit until the government makes a determination whether it will intervene and take a lead in the litigation. If a provider is found to be liable under the False Claims Act, the provider may be required to pay up to three times the actual damages sustained by the government plus mandatory civil monetary penalties of between $5 to $11 for each separate false claim. The government has used the False Claims Act to prosecute Medicare and other government healthcare program fraud such as coding errors, billing for services not provided, submitting false cost reports, and providing care that is not medically necessary or that is substandard in quality.

23

HIPAA Transaction, Privacy and Security Requirements

HIPAA and federal regulations issued pursuant to HIPAA contain, among other measures, provisions that have required SunLink and our subsidiaries to implement modified or new computer systems, employee training programs and business procedures. The federal regulations are intended to encourage electronic commerce in the healthcare industry, provide for the confidentiality and privacy of patient healthcare information and ensure the security of healthcare information.

A violation of the HIPAA regulations could result in civil money penalties of $1 per incident, up to a maximum of $25 per person, per year, per standard violated. HIPAA also provides for criminal penalties of up to $50 and one year in prison for knowingly and improperly obtaining or disclosing protected health information, up to $100 and five years in prison for obtaining protected health information under false pretenses and up to $250 and ten years in prison for obtaining or disclosing protected health information with the intent to sell, transfer or use such information for commercial advantage, personal gain or malicious harm. Since there is limited history of enforcement efforts by the federal government at this time, it is difficult to ascertain the likelihood of enforcement efforts in connection with the HIPAA regulations or the potential for fines and penalties, which may result from any violation of the regulations.

HIPAA Privacy Regulations

HIPAA privacy regulations protect the privacy of individually identifiable health information. The regulations provide increased patient control over medical records, mandate substantial financial penalties for violation of a patient’s right to privacy and, with a few exceptions, require that an individual’s individually identifiable health information only be used for healthcare-related purposes. These privacy standards apply to all health plans, all healthcare clearinghouses and healthcare providers, such as our subsidiaries’ facilities, that transmit health information in an electronic form in connection with standard transactions, and apply to individually identifiable information held or disclosed by a covered entity in any form. These standards impose extensive administrative requirements on our subsidiaries’ facilities and require compliance with rules governing the use and disclosure of such health information, and they require our subsidiaries’ facilities to impose these rules, by contract, on any business associate to whom we disclose such information in order to perform functions on behalf of our subsidiaries’ facilities. In addition, our subsidiaries’ facilities are subject to any state laws that are more restrictive than the privacy regulations issued under HIPAA. These laws vary by state and could impose stricter standards and additional penalties.

The HIPAA privacy regulations also require healthcare providers to implement and enforce privacy policies to ensure compliance with the regulations and standards. In conjunction with a private HIPAA consultant and HIPAA coordinators at each facility, individually tailored policies and procedures were developed and implemented and HIPAA privacy educational programs are presented to all employees and physicians at each facility. We believe all of our subsidiaries’ facilities are in compliance with current HIPAA privacy regulations.

HIPAA Electronic Data Standards

The Administrative Simplification Provisions of HIPAA require the use of uniform electronic data transmission standards for all healthcare related electronic data interchange. These provisions are intended to streamline and encourage electronic commerce in the healthcare industry. Among other things, these provisions require healthcare facilities to use standard data formats and code sets established by HHS when electronically transmitting information in connection with certain transactions, including health claims and equivalent encounter information, healthcare payment and remittance advice and health claim status.

The HHS regulations establish electronic data transmission standards that all healthcare providers and payors must use when submitting and receiving certain electronic healthcare transactions. The uniform data transmission standards are designed to enable healthcare providers to exchange billing and payment information

24

directly with the many payors thereby eliminating data clearinghouses and simplifying the interface programs necessary to perform this function. We believe that the management information systems at our subsidiaries comply with HIPAA’s electronic data regulations and standards.

HIPAA Security Standards

The Administrative Simplification Provisions of HIPAA require the use of a series of security standards for the protection of electronic health information. The HIPAA security standards rule specifies a series of administrative, technical and physical security procedures for covered entities to use to assure the confidentiality of electronic protected health information. The standards are delineated into either required or addressable implementation specifications.

In conjunction with a consortium of rural hospitals, private HIPAA security consultants and HIPAA security officers at each facility, our subsidiaries have performed security assessments, and implemented individually tailored plans to apply required or addressable solutions and implemented a set of security policies and procedures. In addition, our subsidiaries developed and adopted an individually tailored comprehensive disaster contingency plan for each facility and presented a HIPAA security training program to all applicable personnel. We believe SunLink and our subsidiaries are in compliance with all aspects of the HIPAA security regulations.

HIPAA National Provider Identifier

HIPAA also required HHS to issue regulations establishing standard unique health identifiers for individuals, employers, health plans and healthcare providers to be used in connection with standard electronic transactions. All healthcare providers, including our facilities, were required to obtain a new National Provider Identifier (“NPI”) to be used in standard transactions instead of other numerical identifiers by May 23, 2007. Our facilities implemented use of a standard unique healthcare identifier by utilizing their employer identification number. HHS has not yet issued proposed rules that establish the standard for unique health identifiers for health plans or individuals. Once these regulations are issued in final form, we expect to have approximately one to two years to become fully compliant, but cannot predict the impact of such changes at this time. We cannot predict whether our facilities may experience payment delays during the transition to the new identifiers. HHS is currently working on the standards for identifiers for health plans; however, there are currently no proposed timelines for issuance of proposed or final rules. The issuance of proposed rules for individuals is on hold indefinitely.

ICD-10 Coding System

The Administrative Simplification Provisions of HIPAA require the use of uniform electronic data transmission standards for healthcare claims and payment transactions submitted or received electronically. These provisions are intended to encourage electronic commerce in the healthcare industry. HHS has issued regulations implementing the HIPAA Administrative Simplification Provisions and compliance with these regulations is mandatory for our facilities. In January 2009, CMS published a final rule regarding updated standard code sets for certain diagnoses and procedures known as ICD-10 code sets and related changes to the formats used for certain electronic transactions. While use of the ICD-10 code sets is not mandatory until October 1, 2015, our subsidiaries are modifying payment systems and processes to prepare for the implementation. The ICD-10 code sets require significant administrative changes. We believe that the cost of compliance with these regulations has not had a material adverse effect on our cash flows, financial position or results of operations. The Health Reform Law requires HHS to adopt standards for additional electronic transactions and to establish operating rules to promote uniformity in the implementation of each standardized electronic transaction.

25

Medical Waste Regulations

Our operations, especially our healthcare facility operations, generate medical waste that must be disposed of in compliance with federal, state and local environmental laws, rules and regulations. Our operations are also generally subject to various other environmental laws, rules and regulations. Based on our current level of operations, we do not anticipate that such compliance costs will have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, financial position or results of operations.

Regulatory Compliance Program

Our subsidiaries maintain a compliance programs under the direction of a risk manager. The compliance program is directed at all areas of regulatory compliance, including physician recruitment, reimbursement and cost reporting practices, as well as pharmacy and home healthcare operations. Each hospital and the specialty pharmacy operations designates a compliance officer and develops plans to correct problems should they arise. In addition, all employees are provided with a copy of and given an introduction to the subsidiary’s Code of Conduct, which includes ethical and compliance guidelines and instructions about the proper resources to utilize in order to address any concerns that may arise. Each hospital and the specialty pharmacy operations conduct annual training to re-emphasize its Code of Conduct and monitor its compliance program to respond to developments in healthcare regulations and the industry. A toll-free hotline is also maintained to permit employees to report compliance concerns on an anonymous basis.

Professional Liability

As part of our business, our subsidiaries are subject to claims of liability for events occurring in the ordinary course of operations. To cover a portion of these claims, professional malpractice liability insurance and general liability insurance are maintained in amounts which are commercially available and believed to be sufficient for operations as currently conducted, although some claims may exceed the scope or amount of the coverage in effect.

The recorded liability for professional liability risks of our subsidiaries’ operations includes an estimate of liability for claims assumed at the acquisition and for claims incurred after the acquisition of healthcare businesses. These estimates are based on actuarially determined amounts.

Environmental Regulation

We believe our subsidiaries are in substantial compliance with applicable federal, state and local environmental regulations. To date, compliance with federal, state and local laws regulating the discharge of material into the environment or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment have not had a material effect upon our consolidated results of operations, consolidated financial condition or competitive position. Similarly, we have not had to make material capital expenditures to comply with such regulations.

26

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Our executive officers, as of September 25, 2015, their positions with the Company or its subsidiaries and their ages are as follows:

All of our executive officers hold office for an indefinite term, subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors.

Robert M. Thornton, Jr. has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of SunLink Health Systems, Inc. since September 10, 1998, President since July 16, 1996 and was Chief Financial Officer from July 18, 1997 to August 31, 2002. From March 1995 to the present, Mr. Thornton has been a private investor in and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CareVest Capital, LLC, a private investment and management services firm. Mr. Thornton was President, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and a director of Hallmark Healthcare Corporation (“Hallmark”) from November 1993 until Hallmark’s merger with Community Health Systems, Inc. in October 1994. From October 1987 until November 1993, Mr. Thornton was Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and a director of Hallmark.

Mark J. Stockslager has been Chief Financial Officer of SunLink Health Systems, Inc. since July 1, 2007. He was interim Chief Financial Officer from November 6, 2006 until June 30, 2007. He has been the Principal Accounting Officer since March 11, 1998 and was Corporate Controller from November 6, 1996 to June 4, 2007. He has been associated continuously with our accounting and finance operations since June 1988 and has held various positions, including Manager of U.S. Accounting, from June 1993 until November 1996. From June 1982 through May 1988, Mr. Stockslager was employed by Price Waterhouse & Co.

Byron D. Finn was named President of SunLink ScriptsRx, LLC on October 1, 2010. Mr. Finn was most recently president of Byron D. Finn, CPA, PC, which provided accounting, financial consulting and litigation support services to its clients, including numerous healthcare clients. His experience also includes various positions with The Coca-Cola Company, where he served in a number of financial-related positions and in connection with special projects, and he was previously employed by Ernst & Young. Mr. Finn is a licensed CPA and received his BA in Business Administration and Master in Accountancy degrees from the University of Georgia.

In addition to other information contained in this Annual Report, including certain cautionary and forward-looking statements, you should carefully consider the following factors in evaluating an investment in SunLink:

Consolidated Operations Risks

If our operating results continue to decline, we may not be able to generate sufficient cash flows to meet our liquidity needs.

We rely upon cash on hand, cash from operations and a subsidiary based limited revolving loan facility to fund our cash requirements for working capital, capital expenditures, commitments and payments of principal and interest on borrowings. Our ability to generate cash from operations has been negatively impacted by reduced Federal and state reimbursements, uncollectible self-pay net revenues of our Healthcare Facilities

27

Segment, increased salary expenses for employed physicians and decreased patient volume at our facilities as a result of economic conditions in the locations we serve as well as decreased sales volume and earning experienced by our Specialty Pharmacy Segment. We expect that these factors will continue to have a negative impact on our business for the foreseeable future. Further deterioration would negatively impact our results of operations and cash flows.

SunLink would require additional debt or equity capital in order to make significant capital investments or expand our operations and the inability to make significant capital investments or expand our operations may negatively affect SunLink’s competitive position, reduce earnings, and negatively affect our results of operations.

SunLink’s operations strategy requires significant capital investments. Significant capital investments are required for on-going and planned capital improvements at existing facilities and may be required in connection with future capital projects either in connection with existing properties or future acquired properties. SunLink’s ability to make capital investments depends on numerous factors such as the availability of funds from operations and access to additional debt and equity financing. No assurance can be given that the necessary funds will be available. Moreover, incurrence of additional debt financing, if available, may involve additional restrictive covenants that could negatively affect SunLink’s ability to operate its business in the desired manner, and raising additional equity likely would be dilutive to shareholders. The failure to obtain funds necessary for the realization of SunLink’s operating strategy could impair SunLink’s existing operations and could force SunLink to forego opportunities that may arise in the future. This could, in turn, have a negative impact on the competitive position of our operating subsidiaries.

SunLink’s revenues are more heavily concentrated in the State of Georgia which makes SunLink particularly sensitive to economic and other changes in Georgia.

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, our two Georgia hospitals generated approximately 44% of consolidated net revenues for the year. Accordingly, any adverse change in the current demographic, economic, competitive or regulatory conditions in the State of Georgia could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects of SunLink.

SunLink depends heavily on its management personnel and the loss of the services of one or more of SunLink’s key senior management personnel could weaken SunLink’s management team.

SunLink has been, and will continue to be, dependent upon the services and management experience of its executive officers. If any of SunLink’s executive officers were to resign their positions or otherwise be unable to serve, SunLink’s management could be weakened.

SunLink conducts business in a heavily regulated industry; changes in regulations or violations of regulations may result in increased costs or sanctions that could reduce revenue and profitability.

The healthcare industry is subject to extensive federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to:

28

These laws and regulations are extremely complex and, in many instances, the industry does not have the benefit of significant regulatory or judicial interpretation of these laws and regulations, including in particular, Medicare and Medicaid anti-fraud and abuse amendments, codified in Section 1128B(b) of the Social Security Act and known as the “anti-kickback statute.” This law prohibits providers and others from soliciting, receiving, offering or paying, directly or indirectly, any remuneration with the intent to generate referrals of orders for services or items reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal healthcare programs.

HHS regulations describe some of the conduct and business relationships immune from prosecution under the anti-kickback statute. The fact that a given business arrangement does not fall within one of these “safe harbor” provisions does not render the arrangement illegal. However, business arrangements of healthcare service providers that fail to satisfy the applicable safe harbor criteria risk increased scrutiny by enforcement authorities.

We have a variety of financial relationships with physicians who refer patients to our subsidiaries’ hospitals. We have contracts with physicians providing services under a variety of financial arrangements such as employment contracts and professional service agreements. We also provide financial incentives, including loans and minimum revenue guarantees, to recruit physicians into the communities served by our subsidiaries’ hospitals.

HIPAA broadened the scope of the fraud and abuse laws to include all healthcare services, whether or not they are reimbursed under a federal program. In addition, provisions of the Social Security Act, known as the Stark Act, also prohibit physicians from referring Medicare and Medicaid patients to providers of a broad range of designated health services in which the physicians or their immediate family members have an ownership interest or certain other financial arrangements.

In addition, SunLink’s facilities will continue to remain subject to any state laws that are more restrictive than the regulations issued under HIPAA, which vary by state and could impose additional penalties. In recent years, both federal and state government agencies have announced plans for or implemented heightened and coordinated civil and criminal enforcement efforts.

Government officials charged with responsibility for enforcing healthcare laws could assert that SunLink or any of the transactions in which the Company or its subsidiaries or their predecessors is or was involved, are in violation of these laws. It is also possible that these laws ultimately could be interpreted by the courts in a manner that is different from the interpretations made by the Company or others. A determination that either SunLink or its subsidiaries or their predecessors is or was involved in a transaction that violated these laws, or the public announcement that SunLink or its subsidiaries or their predecessors is being investigated for possible violations of these laws, could have a material adverse effect on SunLink’s business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects and SunLink’s business reputation could suffer significantly.

The laws, rules, and regulations described above are complex and subject to interpretation. In the event of a determination that we are in violation of any of these laws, rules or regulations, or if further changes in the regulatory framework occur, our results of operations could be significantly harmed.

SunLink is and in the future could be subject to claims related to discontinued operations, including discontinued healthcare operations.

SunLink has discontinued operations carried on by its former life sciences and engineering segment and certain of our healthcare operations. SunLink currently does not purchase insurance policies to reduce discontinued operations exposures and does not anticipate it will purchase such insurance in the future. Based upon an evaluation of information currently available and consultation with legal counsel, management has not reserved any amounts for contingencies related to the discontinued operations.

29

The industry trend towards value-based purchasing may negatively impact our revenues.

There is a trend in the healthcare industry toward “value-based” purchasing of healthcare services. These value-based purchasing programs include both public reporting of quality data and preventable adverse events tied to the quality and efficiency of care provided by facilities. Governmental programs including Medicare and Medicaid currently require hospitals to report certain quality data to receive full reimbursement updates. In addition, Medicare does not reimburse for care related to certain preventable adverse events. Many large commercial payors currently require hospitals to report quality data, and several commercial payors do not reimburse hospitals for certain preventable adverse events.

The ACA contains a number of provisions intended to promote value-based purchasing. Effective July 1, 2011, the ACA prohibits the use of federal funds under the Medicaid program to reimburse providers for medical assistance provided to treat hospital acquired conditions (“HACs”). An HAC is a condition that is acquired by a patient while admitted as an inpatient at a hospital, such as a surgical site infection. Beginning in federal fiscal year 2015, hospitals that fall into the top 25% of national risk-adjusted HAC rates for all hospitals in the previous year will receive a 1% reduction in their total Medicare payments. Hospitals with excessive readmissions for conditions designated by HHS will receive reduced payments for all inpatient discharges, not just discharges relating to the conditions subject to the excessive readmission standard.

The ACA also requires HHS to implement a value-based purchasing program for inpatient hospital services. The Affordable Care Act requires HHS to reduce inpatient hospital payments for all discharges by a percentage beginning at 1% in federal fiscal year 2013 and increasing by 0.25% each fiscal year up to 2% in federal fiscal year 2017 and subsequent years. HHS will pool the amount collected from these reductions to fund payments to reward hospitals that meet or exceed certain quality performance standards established by HHS. HHS will determine the amount each of our subsidiaries’ hospital that meets or exceeds the quality performance standards will receive from the pool of dollars created by these payment reductions.

We expect value-based purchasing programs, including programs that condition reimbursement on patient outcome measures, to become more common and to involve a higher percentage of reimbursement amounts. We are unable at this time to predict how this trend will affect our results of operations, but it could negatively impact our financial condition or results of operations.

The lingering effects of the economic recession could adversely affect our cash flows, financial position, or results of operations.

The United States economy recently experienced a major economic recession, the economy remains relatively weak, unemployment levels remain high, and there is a substantial risk that the economy could lapse back into recession. Much healthcare spending is discretionary and can be significantly impacted by economic downturns. When patients are experiencing personal financial difficulties or have concerns about general economic conditions, they may choose to defer or forego elective surgeries and other non-emergent procedures, which are generally more profitable lines of business for hospitals. In addition, employers may impose or patients may select a high-deductible insurance plan or no insurance at all, which increases a hospital’s dependence on self-pay revenue. Moreover, a greater number of uninsured patients may seek care in our emergency rooms.

We are unable to quantify the specific impact of recent or continued adverse economic conditions on our business; however we believe that the lingering effects of the economic recession have had an adverse impact on our operations. Such impact can be expected to continue to affect not only the healthcare decisions of our patients and potential patients but could also have an adverse impact on the solvency of certain managed care providers and other counterparties to transactions with us.

30

Our subsidiaries are subject to potential claims for professional liability, including claims based on the acts or omissions of third parties, which claims may not be covered by insurance.

Our subsidiaries are subject to potential claims for professional liability (medical malpractice) in connection with current operations, as well as potentially acquired or discontinued operations. To cover such claims, professional malpractice liability insurance and general liability insurance is maintained in amounts believed to be sufficient for operations, although some claims may exceed the scope or amount of the coverage in effect. The assertion of a significant number of claims, either within a self-insured retention (deductible) or individually or in the aggregate in excess of available insurance, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. Premiums for professional liability insurance have historically been volatile and we cannot assure you that professional liability insurance will continue to be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all. The operations of hospitals also depend on the professional services of physicians and other trained healthcare providers and technicians in the conduct of their respective operations, including independent laboratories and physicians rendering diagnostic and medical services. There can be no assurance that any legal action stemming from the act or omission of a third party provider of healthcare services, would not be brought against one of our subsidiaries’ hospitals or SunLink, resulting in significant legal expenses in order to defend against such legal action or to obtain a financial contribution from the third-party whose acts or omissions occasioned the legal action.

Risks Related to Our Healthcare Facility Operations

SunLink’s success depends on its hospital subsidiaries’ ability to maintain good relationships with the physicians and, if a hospital is unable to successfully maintain good relationships with physicians, admissions and outpatient revenues may decrease and operating performance could decline.

Because physicians generally direct the majority of hospital admissions and outpatient services, a hospitals success is, in part, dependent upon the number and quality of physicians on the medical staffs, the admissions and referrals practices of the physicians at our subsidiaries’ hospitals, and the ability to maintain good relations with physicians. Many physicians are not employees of the hospitals at which they practice and, in many of the markets, most physicians have admitting privileges at other hospitals. If one or more of the hospitals operated by our subsidiaries is unable to successfully maintain good relationships with physicians, admissions may decrease and operating performance could decline.

SunLink depends heavily on its subsidiaries’ healthcare facility management personnel and the loss of the services of one or more of SunLink’s key local management personnel could weaken SunLink’s management team and its ability to deliver healthcare services.

The success of our hospital subsidiaries depends on their ability to attract and retain managers and related health care employees and on the ability of hospital-based officers and key employees to manage growth successfully. SunLink’s subsidiaries have not had any material difficulties in attracting healthcare facility management; however, if a hospital is unable to attract and retain affective local management, the operating performance of that facility could decline.

SunLink’s success depends on the ability of our operating subsidiaries to attract and retain qualified healthcare professionals. A shortage of qualified healthcare professionals in certain markets could weaken the ability of our subsidiaries to deliver healthcare services.

In addition to the physicians and management personnel whom each subsidiary’s hospital employs, hospital operations are dependent on the efforts, ability, and experience of other healthcare professionals, such as nurses, pharmacists and lab technicians. Nurses, pharmacists, lab technicians and other healthcare professionals are generally employees of an individual subsidiaries’ hospital. Each subsidiary’s hospital’s success has been, and will continue to be, influenced by its ability to attract and retain these skilled employees. A shortage of healthcare

31

professionals in certain markets, the loss of some or all of its key employees or the inability to attract or retain sufficient numbers of qualified healthcare professionals could cause a hospital’s operating performance to decline.

A significant portion of SunLink’s revenue is dependent on Medicare and Medicaid payments to its subsidiaries and possible reductions in Medicare or Medicaid payments or the implementation of other measures to reduce reimbursements may reduce our revenues.

A significant portion of SunLink’s consolidated revenues are derived from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, which are highly regulated and subject to frequent and substantial changes. Approximately 88% of consolidated patient days and 63% of consolidated net patient revenues were derived from the Medicare and Medicaid programs for the year ended June 30, 2015. Previous legislative changes have resulted in, and future legislative changes may result in, limitations on and reduced levels of payment and reimbursement for a substantial portion of hospital procedures and costs. Georgia and Mississippi have not expanded Medicaid or set-up exchanges.

Future healthcare legislation or other changes in the administration or interpretation of governmental healthcare programs may have a material adverse effect on our consolidated business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

Revenue and profitability of our subsidiaries’ healthcare facility operations, especially our community hospital operations, may be constrained by future cost containment initiatives undertaken by purchasers of healthcare services.

Our subsidiaries’ hospitals have been affected by the increasing number of initiatives undertaken during the past several years by all major purchasers of healthcare, including (in addition to federal and state governments) insurance companies and employers, to revise payment methodologies and monitor healthcare expenditures in order to contain healthcare costs. Our community hospital operations derived approximately 37% of their consolidated net patient revenues for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 from private payors and other non-governmental sources who contributed approximately 12% of consolidated patient days. Initiatives such as managed care organizations offering prepaid and discounted medical services packages have adversely affected hospital revenue growth throughout the country and such packages represent an increasing portion of SunLink’s subsidiaries’ admissions and outpatient revenues and have resulted in reduced revenue growth at our subsidiaries’ hospitals. In addition, private payers increasingly are attempting to control healthcare costs through direct contracting with hospitals to provide services on a discounted basis, increased utilization review and greater enrollment in managed care programs such as health maintenance organizations and preferred provider organizations, referred to as PPOs. If our subsidiaries, specifically our hospital subsidiaries, are unable to contain costs through increased operational efficiencies and the trend toward declining reimbursements and payments continues, the results of healthcare facility segment operations and cash flow will be adversely affected and the results of our consolidated operations and our consolidated cash flow similarly likely would be adversely affected.

Our healthcare subsidiaries, especially community hospital subsidiaries, face intense competition from other hospitals and healthcare providers which directly affect our segment and consolidated revenues and profitability.

Although each of our subsidiaries’ hospitals operates in communities where they are currently the only general, acute care hospital, they face substantial competition from other hospitals, including larger tertiary care centers. Although these competing hospitals may be as far as 30 to 50 miles away, patients in these markets may migrate to these competing facilities as a result of local physician referrals, managed care plan incentives or personal choice.

32

The healthcare business is highly competitive and competition among hospitals and other healthcare providers for patients has intensified in recent years. Each of our subsidiaries’ hospitals operates in geographic areas where they compete with at least one other hospital that provides comparable services. Some of these competing facilities offer services, including extensive medical research and medical education programs, which are not offered by SunLink’s subsidiaries’ facilities. Some of the competing hospitals are owned or operated by tax-supported governmental bodies or by private not-for-profit entities supported by endowments and charitable contributions which can finance capital expenditures on a tax-exempt basis and are exempt from sales, property, and income taxes. In some of these markets, SunLink’s subsidiaries’ hospitals also face competition from other for-profit hospital companies, some of which have substantially greater resources, as well as other providers such as outpatient surgery and diagnostic centers.

The intense competition from other hospitals and other healthcare providers directly affects the market share of our subsidiaries’ community hospitals, as well as their and our revenues and profitability.

Changes in market demographics may increase competition for certain of our subsidiaries’ community hospitals.

Some of our subsidiaries’ hospitals are located in exurban areas which are becoming more suburban or metropolitan. Such markets are likely to attract additional competitors, including satellite operations of tertiary hospitals. We cannot assure you that we will have the financial resources to fund capital improvements to our subsidiaries’ existing facilities, which may face additional competition or that even if financial resources are available to us, projected operating results will justify such expenditures. An inability to fund or the infeasibility of funding capital improvements could directly or indirectly have an adverse impact on hospital revenues through lower patient utilization, increased difficulty in physician recruitment and otherwise as a result of increased competition.

SunLink’s subsidiaries’ hospitals are and other healthcare facilities may be subject to, and depend on, certificate of need laws which could affect their ability to operate profitably.

All states in which SunLink subsidiaries currently operate hospitals and nursing homes have laws requiring approval for the purchase, construction or expansion of various healthcare facilities including hospitals, nursing homes and ambulatory surgery centers and the provision of various services. Under such certificate of need (“CON”) laws, prior state approval is required for the acquisition of major medical equipment or the purchase, lease, construction, expansion, sale or closure of covered healthcare facilities, based on a determination of need for additional or expanded facilities or services. The failure to obtain any required CON may impair SunLink’s subsidiaries’ ability to operate profitably.

In addition, the elimination or modification of CON laws in states in which SunLink subsidiaries operate or in the future may operate hospitals and other covered healthcare facilities could subject such facilities to greater competition making it more difficult to operate profitably.

If our subsidiaries’ hospitals fail to effectively and timely implement electronic health record systems and transition to the ICD-10 coding system, our consolidated operations could be adversely affected.

As required by ARRA, HHS has adopted an incentive payment program for eligible hospitals and healthcare professionals that implement certified EHR technology and use it consistently with “meaningful use” requirements. If our subsidiaries’ hospitals and employed or contracted professionals do not meet the Medicare or Medicaid EHR incentive program requirements, their hospitals and clinics will not receive Medicare or Medicaid incentive payments to offset some of the costs of implementing the EHR systems. Further, beginning in federal fiscal year 2015, eligible hospitals and physicians that fail to demonstrate meaningful use of certified EHR technology will be subject to reduced payments from Medicare. Failure to implement EHR systems effectively and in a timely manner could have a material, adverse effect on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

33

Health plans and providers, including our subsidiaries’ hospitals, are required to transition to the new ICD-10 coding system, which greatly expands the number and detail of billing codes used for inpatient claims. Under current regulations, use of the ICD-10 system is required beginning October 1, 2015. Transition to the new ICD-10 system requires significant investment in coding technology and software as well as the training of staff involved in the coding and billing process. In addition to these upfront costs of transition to ICD-10, it is possible that our subsidiaries’ hospitals could experience disruption or delays in payment due to technical or coding errors or other implementation issues involving systems or the systems and implementation efforts of health plans and their business partners.

Risks Relating to our Specialty Pharmacy Business

The operations of our Specialty Pharmacy Segment may be adversely affected by changes in government reimbursement regulations and payment levels.

For the year ended June 30, 2015, the operation by ScriptsRx of our Specialty Pharmacy Segment derived approximately 22% of its net revenues from government payors, principally Medicare and Medicaid. The Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 exempted rural providers of home care related services from the competitive acquisition program to which urban providers are subject.

We cannot assure you that the ASP reimbursement methodology will not be extended to the provision of all specialty pharmaceuticals or to the specialty pharmaceuticals most often sold by the ScriptsRx or that ScriptsRx will continue to be able to operate our Specialty Pharmacy Segment profitably at either existing or at lower reimbursement rates. Likewise, we cannot assure you that the Part B CAP program will not be extended to rural or exurban areas in general or to the areas in which ScriptsRx operates, or may seek to operate, in particular or that ScriptsRx would be able to meet the qualifications to become a Part B CAP vendor either now or at any time in the future.

The operations of our Specialty Pharmacy Segment could be harmed by further changes in government purchasing methodologies and reimbursement rates for Medicare or Medicaid.

In addition to the impact of MMA, in order to deal with budget shortfalls, some states are attempting to create state administered prescription drug discount plans, to limit the number of prescriptions per person that are covered, and to raise Medicaid co-pays and deductibles, and are proposing more restrictive formularies and reductions in pharmacy reimbursement rates. Any reductions in amounts reimbursable by other government programs for pharmacy services or changes in regulations governing such reimbursements could materially and adversely affect our pharmacy business, financial condition and results of operations.

The durable medical equipment service line of ScriptsRx may be adversely affected by changes in government reimbursement regulations and payment levels, especially if the durable medical equipment service line becomes subject to competitive bidding procedures.

Although ScriptsRx is currently exempted under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 from the competitive acquisition program for DMEPOS, we cannot be sure such exemption will continue to be available in the future. Loss of such exemption could have an adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations.

The operations of our Specialty Pharmacy Segment depend on a continuous supply of key products. Any shortages of key products could adversely affect the business of ScriptsRx.

Many of the biopharmaceutical products distributed by the operations of our Specialty Pharmacy Segment are manufactured with ingredients that are susceptible to supply shortages. In addition, the manufacturers of these products may not have adequate manufacturing capability to meet rising demand. If any products distributed by ScriptsRx are in short supply for long periods of time, this could result in a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

34

The operations of our Specialty Pharmacy Segment are highly dependent on relationships with key suppliers and the loss of any of such key suppliers could adversely affect the business of ScriptsRx.

Any termination of, or adverse change in, our relationships with our key suppliers, or the loss of supply of one of our key products for any other reason, could have a material adverse effect on the business of ScriptsRx and our consolidated results of operations. The largest supplier for ScriptsRx accounted for approximately 77% of the segment’s cost of goods sold in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. Our specialty pharmacy operations have a single source of supply for many of our key products, including one product which accounted for approximately 6% of the segment’s net revenues sold in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. In addition, ScriptsRx has few long-term contracts with its suppliers. Arrangements with most of its suppliers may be canceled by either party, without cause and on minimal notice; and many of these arrangements are not governed by written agreements.

The loss of one or more of larger institutional pharmacy customers could hurt our business by reducing the revenues and profitability of the operations of our Specialty Pharmacy Segment.

As is customary in the institutional pharmacy industry, our Specialty Pharmacy Segment generally does not have long-term contracts with its institutional pharmacy customers. Significant declines in the level of purchases by one or more of the larger institutional pharmacy customers could have a material adverse effect on the business of ScriptsRx and our consolidated results of operations.

The failure of ScriptsRx to maintain eligibility as a Medicare and Medicaid supplier could materially adversely affect its competitive position. Likewise, its failure to maintain and expand relationships with private payors, who can effectively determine the pharmacy source for their members, could materially adversely affect its competitive position.

Changes in average wholesale prices could reduce our pricing and margins.

Many government payors, including Medicare and Medicaid, have paid, or continue to pay, the operations of our Specialty Pharmacy Segment directly or indirectly at a rate based upon a drug’s AWP less a percentage factor. ScriptsRx also has contracted with some private payors to sell drugs at AWP or at AWP less a percentage factor. For most drugs, AWP is compiled and published by several private companies, including First DataBank, Inc. Several states have filed lawsuits against pharmaceutical manufacturers for allegedly inflating reported AWP for prescription drugs. In addition, class action lawsuits have been brought by consumers against pharmaceutical manufacturers alleging overstatement of AWP. We are not responsible for such calculations, reports or payments; however, there can be no assurance that the ability of our Specialty Pharmacy Segment to negotiate discounts from drug manufacturers will not be materially adversely affected by such investigations or lawsuits.

The federal government also has entered into settlement agreements with several drug manufacturers relating to the calculation and reporting of AWP pursuant to which the drug manufacturers, among other things, have agreed to report new pricing information, the “average sales price”, to government healthcare programs. The average sales price is calculated differently than AWP.

ScriptsRx faces numerous competitors and potential competitors in the market in which our Specialty Pharmacy Segment operates, many of whom are significantly larger and who have significantly greater financial resources.

Large national companies operate in the existing market in which our Specialty Pharmacy Segment operates. We cannot assure you that one or more of such companies or other healthcare companies will not seek to compete or intensify their level of competition in the areas in which we conduct or may seek to conduct one or more of the components of the operations of our Specialty Pharmacy Segment.

35

The operations of our Specialty Pharmacy Segment may be adversely affected by industry trends in managed care contracting and consolidation.

A growing number of health plans are contracting with a single provider of specialty pharmacy services. Likewise, manufacturers may not be eager to contract with regional providers of specialty pharmacy services. If ScriptsRx is unable to obtain managed care contracts in the areas in which we provide specialty pharmacy services or are unable to obtain specialty pharmacy products at reasonable costs or at all, the business operations of our Specialty Pharmacy Segment could be adversely affected.

The specialty pharmacy market may grow slower than expected, which could adversely affect our revenues.

We cannot predict the rate of actual future growth in product availability and spending, the extent to which patient demand or spending for specialty drug services in rural or exurban areas will match national averages or whether government payors will provide reimbursement for new products under Medicare or Medicaid on a timely basis, at what rates or at all. Adverse developments in any of these areas could have an adverse impact on the business operations of our Specialty Pharmacy Segment.

The profitability of our Specialty Pharmacy Segment can be adversely affected by a decrease in the introduction of new brand name and generic prescription drugs.

Sales and profit margins of ScriptsRx are materially affected by the introduction of new brand name and generic drugs. New brand name drugs can result in increased drug utilization and associated sales revenues, while the introduction of lower priced generic alternatives typically result in relatively lower sales revenues, but higher gross profit margins. Accordingly, a decrease in the number of significant new brand name drugs or generics successfully introduced could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Other Risks

Future developments could affect our ability to maintain adequate liquidity. Additionally, our ability to access alternative sources of capital is limited.

Historically our available capital has been sufficient to meet our operating expenses, lease obligations, debt service requirements, and capital expenditures and we have managed our liquidity such that our aggregate unrestricted cash at June 30, 2015, was $5,974 and our Trace hospital subsidiary has a $500 revolving line of credit (of which $0 was drawn as of June 30, 2015). Future circumstances could require us to materially increase our revenues, materially reduce our expenses, or otherwise materially improve operating results, dispose of existing assets or obtain material new sources of capital in order to maintain adequate liquidity.

The Company is currently limited in its ability to raise capital, debt or equity, in the public or private markets on what it considers acceptable terms, although it is actively seeking options to provide financing for the Company’s liquidity needs. Three of the Company’s subsidiaries have been able to borrow money through facility based mortgages, each of which is guaranteed by the Company, utilizing USDA Rural Development Authority guaranties, (individually, an “RDA Loan” and collectively, the “RDA Loans”), and, in the case of our Trace hospital subsidiary, obtain a revolving working capital loan facility of $500. The Company and its subsidiaries currently must fund working capital needs from cash from operations or from the sale of additional assets, and we cannot assure you that we would be successful in improving our results of operations, reducing our costs, obtaining additional credit facilities or selling additional assets.

If we were to go private, holders of our securities would be subject to the risks of an investment in a private rather than a public company.

From time to time the Company has considered the advisability of deregistering it common shares under the Exchange Act. In the event the Company were able to deregister its common shares under the Exchange Act,

36

holders of our securities would be subject to the risks of an investment in a private rather than a public company. Upon any such deregistration of our shares, our duty to file periodic reports with the SEC would be suspended for as long as we had fewer than 300 record shareholders, and we would no longer be a public reporting company. In addition, we would be relieved of the obligation to comply with the requirements of the proxy rules under Section 14 of the Exchange Act. When and if the Company were to deregister, SunLink shares would no longer be listed on the NYSE Amex Equities stock exchange, and there might not be a sufficient number of shares outstanding and publicly traded following any deregistration to ensure a continued trading market in the shares in any over-the-counter market. The continued quotation of our common shares as well as the availability of any over-the-counter trading in our common shares would depend, in part, on the nature and extent of continued publicly available information about SunLink. Shareholders also could be adversely affected by a reduction in our “public float,” that is, the number of shares owned by outside shareholders and available for trading in the securities markets, especially if the Company makes future tender offers or private or open market purchases of its common shares. The suspension of our reporting obligations under the Exchange Act might further reduce the existing limited trading market for the Company’s shares and may result in a decline in the price of the Company’s shares and reduced liquidity in any trading market for our shares in the future. We might also have less access to capital markets and not be able to use the Company’s shares to effect acquisitions as a non-reporting company. Although the Company is not currently pursuing an effort to deregister our common shares under the Exchange Act, there is no assurance that our Board may not again determine to pursue going private in the future.

Forward-looking statements in this annual report may prove inaccurate.

This document contains forward-looking statements about SunLink that are not historical facts but, rather, are statements about future expectations. Forward-looking statements in this document are based on management’s current views and assumptions and may be influenced by factors that could cause actual results, performance or events to be materially different from those projected. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties. Important factors, some of which are beyond the control of SunLink, could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. These factors include those described above under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report under “Forward-Looking Statements.”

None.

37

Our principal properties as of the date of filing of this report are listed below:

Office of Inspector General Investigation

In March 2013, SunLink received a document subpoena from the United States Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) in connection with an investigation of possible improper claims submitted to Medicare and Medicaid. The subpoena was directed to SunLink’s indirect subsidiary, Southern Health Corporation of Dahlonega, Inc. (“SHCD”), which owns and operates Chestatee Regional Hospital in Dahlonega, Georgia, and requested documents concerning possible false or fraudulent claims made for intensive outpatient psychiatric services provided by and billed for a third-party outpatient psychiatric service provider. The subpoena also sought information about SHCD’s relationship with the outpatient psychiatric service provider, including financial arrangements. SHCD cooperated with the government with respect to a document production, as well as by conducting a joint medical necessity review of a sampling of medical records. In April 2015, we were advised by the OIG that the investigation as it relates to SHCD has been closed and, that no action will be taken by the OIG against SHCD. Accordingly, the Company regards this matter as closed.

38

PART II

SunLink common shares are listed on the NYSE Amex Equities exchange. SunLink’s ticker symbol is “SSY”. The following table shows, for the calendar quarters indicated, based on published financial sources, the high and low sale prices of SunLink common shares as reported on the NYSE Amex Equities exchange.

American Stock Transfer & Trust Company is the Transfer Agent and Registrar for our common shares. For all shareholder inquiries, call American Stock Transfer & Trust’s Shareholder Services Department at 1-888-937-5449.

Dividends

SunLink does not currently pay cash dividends. SunLink intends to retain its earnings for use in the operation and expansion of its business and for other corporate purposes and, therefore, does not anticipate declaring or paying regular cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to declare or pay cash dividends will be determined by SunLink’s board of directors and will depend on SunLink’s financial condition, results of operations, business, prospects, capital requirements, credit agreements and such other matters as the board of directors may consider relevant.

Holders

As of June 30, 2015 there were approximately 415 registered holders of SunLink common shares.

39

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The following provides tabular disclosure of the number of securities at June 30, 2015 to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, the weighted average exercise price of outstanding options and the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans, reported by two categories- plans that have been approved by shareholders and plans that have not been so approved:

40

Performance Graph

The following graph presents a comparison of five years cumulative total return for SunLink, the NYSE Amex Equities exchange Composite Index and a self constructed peer group. The peer group consists of Amsurg Corp., Community Health Systems Inc., Dynacq Healthcare Inc., Lifepoint Hospitals Inc., Magellan Health Services Inc., Tenet Healthcare Corp., and Universal Health Services Inc. There is no assurance the Hospital Index peer group or NYSE Amex Equities Composite is comparable to SunLink, because, among other reasons, both consist of larger companies than SunLink.

41

Selected historical financial data presented below as of and for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011. The following financial information reflects the disposition of Fulton, Dexter, Chilton operations (exclusive of the physical facility), Memorial and three home health agencies. This data should be read in conjunction with “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and the Consolidated Financial Statements of SunLink and the notes thereto included in Item 8 of this Annual Report.

SunLink Selected Historical Financial Data

(All amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

42

This Annual Report and the documents that are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include all statements that do not relate solely to historical or current facts and may be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “believe,” “will,” “seeks to”, “expect,” “project,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “plan” or “continue.” These forward-looking statements are based on the current plans and expectations and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors which could significantly affect current plans and expectations and our future financial condition and results. For a listing and a discussion of such factors, which could cause actual results, performance and achievements to differ materially from those anticipated, see Certain Cautionary Statements—Forward Looking Information and Item 1A.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures. We consider an accounting estimate to be critical if:

The table of critical accounting estimates that follows is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies that require estimates. We believe that of our significant accounting policies, as discussed in Note 2 of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, the estimates discussed below involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity. We believe the current assumptions and other considerations used to estimate amounts reflected in our consolidated financial statements are appropriate. However, if actual experience differs from the assumptions and other considerations used in estimating amounts reflected in our consolidated financial statements, the resulting changes could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

43

The table that follows presents information about our critical accounting estimates, as well as the effects of hypothetical changes in the material assumptions used to develop each estimate:

44

45

HEALTHCARE FACILITIES SEGMENT NET ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

JUNE 30, 2015

SPECIALTY PHARMACY SEGMENT NET ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

JUNE 30, 2015

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

Financial Summary

The results of continuing operations shown in the historical summary below are for our two business segments, Healthcare Facilities and Specialty Pharmacy.

Equivalent admissions—Equivalent admissions is used by management (and certain investors) as a general approximation of combined inpatient and outpatient volume. Equivalent admissions are computed by multiplying admissions (inpatient volume) by the sum of gross inpatient revenues and gross outpatient revenues and dividing the result by gross inpatient revenues. The equivalent admissions computation is intended to relate outpatient revenues to the volume measure (admissions) used to measure inpatient volume to result in a general approximation of combined inpatient and outpatient volume (equivalent admissions).

Results of Operations

Our net revenues are from our two business segments, Healthcare Facilities and Specialty Pharmacy.

Healthcare Facilities Segment

The following table sets forth the percentage of net patient revenues from major payors for the Healthcare Facilities Segment for the periods indicated:

54

The slight 0.3% decrease in Healthcare Facilities Segment net revenues for the year ended June 30, 2015 compared to the year ended June 30, 2014 resulted primarily due to decreased Self-pay revenues. This decrease resulted primarily due to the closing of the emergency department in one of our hospitals in September 2014. Revenues for the three other payor classes increased with Medicare net revenues increasing 2.6%, Medicaid net revenues increasing 1.3% and Commercial Insurance & Other revenues increasing 1.0%, respectively, from the prior year. Net revenues for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 included a reduction of revenues of $262 for the settlements and filings of prior year Medicare and Medicaid cost reports compared to increases of $325 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. Net outpatient service revenues decreased slightly in fiscal 2015, from 36.8% of healthcare facilities segment net revenue to 34.7% as compared to the prior fiscal year. Healthcare Facilities Segment net revenues decreased $3,529, or 5.7%, in the year ended June 30, 2014 compared to the year ended June 30, 2013. The elimination of certain unprofitable services at three of SunLink’s hospitals combined with an overall decline in volumes contributed to the decrease in Healthcare Facilities Segment net revenues in the year. The elimination of certain unprofitable services has resulted in increasing net revenues per equivalent admissions of 8% in 2015 and 11% in 2014, respectively, from the prior fiscal year. Net revenues for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013, included $1,767, $1,598 and $1,320 respectively, from state indigent care programs.

We also have expended approximately $3,090 for capital expenditures to upgrade services and facilities at our three Healthcare Facilities Segment facilities since July 1, 2012. We believe upgraded services and facilities can contribute to an increase in net revenue per equivalent admission by attracting new patients and may mitigate decreases in net revenues per equivalent admission by limiting the loss of patients to competition from other facilities. We continue to seek increased patient volume by attracting additional physicians to our hospitals, adding and upgrading the services offered by our hospitals on an as needed basis and improving our hospitals’ physical facilities based on the availability of capital resources and our assessment of expected return on capital.

Specialty Pharmacy Segment

Net revenues for the year ended June 30, 2015 decreased 0.4% from the prior year, with decreased infusion therapy revenues somewhat offset by increased institutional and retail pharmacy and durable medical equipment (DME) revenues. Revenue from the sale of one infusion drug which is primarily sold to Medicaid covered customers decreased by approximately $3,695 due to Louisiana Medicaid restricting both the number of eligible customers and number of approved doses of the drug. Institutional pharmacy revenues increased 29.3%, retail pharmacy revenues increased 3.4% and DME increased 8.2% in 2015 as compared to 2014.

Net revenues for the year ended June 30, 2014 remained consistent with the prior year net revenues; however, fiscal 2014 included a net increase in pharmacy net revenues of $957 due primarily to additional institutional pharmacy contracts and a net decline in durable medical equipment sales of $949 due primarily to the elimination of certain unprofitable items. Although fiscal 2014 retail and institutional pharmacy script volumes increased 8.7% as compared to fiscal 2013, the corresponding pharmacy net revenues decreased 4.1%, primarily as a result of decreases in reimbursement rates, including Medicare, Medicaid and managed care; the negative effects of significant brand-to-generic conversion activity; and, a significant increase in exclusive preferred provider network arrangements between major pharmacy benefit managers and certain retail chain pharmacies. Fiscal 2014 infusion therapy net revenues increased 2.0% as compared to fiscal 2013, primarily related to certain higher reimbursed specialty pharmacy services.

55

Healthcare Facilities Segment Cost and Expenses

Costs and expenses for our Healthcare Facilities, including depreciation and amortization, were $53,140, $53,923, and $58,246, for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Salaries, wages and benefits expense decreased as a percentage of net revenue in the year ended June 30, 2015 due to decreased in employee medical claims incurred as compared to the prior year. Salaries, wages and benefits expense as a percentage of total net revenues were relatively unchanged in the year ended June 30, 2014 compared to the prior year.

Purchased services decreased as a percentage of net revenues for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 compared to the prior fiscal year due reduced legal fees, medical professional fees and outside collection expense. Purchased services increased as a percentage of net revenues for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 compared to the prior fiscal year due to increased costs associated with certain outside services provided to the hospital facilities and information technology services.

EHR incentive payments as a percentage of net revenue are 0.1%, (5.9%) and (6.1%) for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in fiscal 2015 compared to prior years results from no Medicare incentive payments being received this year. 2015 incentive payments were $50 for Medicaid compared to $2,905 Medicare and $511 Medicaid in 2014 and $2,793 Medicare and $984 Medicaid in 2013. We believe we will receive minimal EHR incentive payments in future periods.

For the year ended June 30, 2015, other operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue decreased from prior year. Other operating expenses decreased due to decreased professional and general liability insurance expense as a result of improved claims experience and decreased legal and medical specialty expense.

Depreciation and amortization expense was $1,305, $1,533, and $1,931 for the years ended June 30, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. The decreases in depreciation and amortization expense resulted from assets being fully over depreciated the past several years.

56

Specialty Pharmacy Segment Cost and Expenses

Cost and expenses for our Specialty Pharmacy Segment, including depreciation and amortization, was $32,681, $32,769 and $33,151 for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Cost of goods sold as a percent of net revenues decreased in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 as compared to the respective prior fiscal years due to changes in sales product mix and favorable pricing negotiations and discounts earned with certain suppliers. The 53% decrease in infusion therapy products revenues in 2015 was the primary cause of decrease for 2015 compared to 2014.

Salaries, wages and benefits as a percent of net revenues increased in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013 as compared to the respective prior fiscal years primarily due to expansion of services and increased compliance and documentation requirements.

Other operating expenses as a percent of net revenues increased during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 as compared to the prior fiscal year primarily due to office and related expenses incurred in connection with an additional retail location.

Depreciation and amortization expense as a percent of net revenues increased during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 as compared to the prior fiscal year due to increased depreciation expense related to additions and improvements to owned and leased properties. Depreciation and amortization expense was $796, $730 and $729 for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

Corporate Overhead Costs and Expenses

Cost and expenses for Corporate Overhead including depreciation and amortization, was $3,477, $3,978 and $5,578 for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 from the prior year was due to decreased depreciation and amortization expense resulting from assets becoming fully depreciated or transferred to the Healthcare Facilities Segment. The decrease in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 from the prior year was due primarily to decreased salaries and legal expense.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

A hospital facility and related equipment in Clanton, Alabama, formerly leased to a third party hospital operator is currently vacant with the exception of three leased offices. The net realizable value of the hospital and equipment was evaluated and it was determined that an impairment of the net value of the leased property, plant and equipment had occurred. An impairment charge of $789 was recognized during the first quarter of fiscal 2013.

57

Insurance settlement

In January 2015, the Company received a $1,000 settlement on a claim made under its insurance policy covering, among other things, employee theft relating to misappropriation of funds by two now former employees over an eight year period beginning in 2006. Income of $1,000 was recognized in the year ended June 30, 2015.

Operating Profit (Loss)

Operating profit was $2,534 for the year ended June 30, 2015, $1,304 for the year ended June 30, 2014 and an operating loss for the year end June 30, 2013 of $1,856. The increased operating profit for the year ended June 30, 2015 results lower operating expenses and the $1,000 insurance settlement. The increased operating profit for the year ended June 30, 2014 compared to the prior year was the result of lower operating expenses and the absence of an impairment charge to property, plant and equipment partially offset by lower net revenues and EHR incentive payments. The operating loss for the year ended June 30, 2013 compared to the prior year operating profit was the result of lower net revenues and EHR incentive payments partially offset by lower cost of goods sold and decreases in certain other operating expenses.

Interest Expense—net

Interest expense was $861, $944, and $1,533 for the years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and, 2013, respectively. The decreases in interest expense for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was due to lower outstanding debt and a decrease in interest rates.

Income Taxes

We recorded income tax expense of $1,020 ($528 federal tax benefit and $492 state tax expense) for the year ended June 30, 2015 compared to income tax expense of $652 ($149 federal tax expense and $503 state tax expense) for the year ended June 30, 2014 and income tax benefit of $1,521 ($1,379 federal tax benefit and $142 state tax benefit) for the year ended June 30, 2013.

We had an estimated net operating loss carry-forward for federal income tax purposes of approximately $4,096 at June 30, 2015. Use of this net operating loss carry-forward is subject to the limitation provisions of Internal Revenue Code Section 382. As a result, not all of the net operating loss carry-forward is available to offset federal taxable income in the current year. We have provided a valuation allowance for $2,564 of our $9,416 gross deferred tax asset (the majority of which is the net operating loss carry-forward for federal and state income tax purposes). Based upon management’s assessment that it was more likely than not that a portion of the Company’s deferred tax asset (primarily its net operating losses subject to limitation) would not be recovered, the Company established a valuation allowance for the portion of the tax asset which may not be utilized.

Earnings (Loss) After Taxes

Earnings from continuing operations was $674 ($0.07 per fully diluted share) for the year ended June 30, 2015 compared to a loss from continuing operations of $333 ($0.04 loss per fully diluted share) for the year ended June 30, 2014 and loss from continuing operations of $1,868 ($0.20 loss per fully diluted share) for the year ended June 30, 2013. Earnings from continuing operations in fiscal year 2015 resulted from decrease operating expenses for the Healthcare Facilities and decreased cost of goods sold.

A loss from discontinued operations of $429 for the year ended June 30, 2015 primarily resulted from $727 of pre-tax earnings from the operations of Dexter (including $703 of Medicare EHR incentive payments), $1,170 of pre-tax loss from the operations of Fulton, $15 of pre-tax profit from operations of Memorial, $197 of loss on sale of Fulton, $105 of pre-tax loss resulting from domestic pension items and $301 of income tax benefit. A loss from discontinued operations of $212 for the year ended June 30, 2014 primarily resulted from $1,548 of pre-tax earnings from the operations of Dexter, $1,621 of pre-tax loss from the operations of Fulton, $94 of pre-tax loss

58

from operations of Memorial, $158 of pre-tax loss resulting from domestic pension items and $113 of income tax benefit. Earnings from discontinued operations of $6,356 for the year ended June 30, 2013 primarily resulted from $542 of pre-tax earnings from the operations of Dexter, $498 from pre-tax profit from operations of Fulton, $26 of pre-tax loss from operations of Memorial, the $253 of pre-tax loss resulting from domestic pension items, pre-tax gains of $9,289 and $1,161 on the sale of Dexter and Memorial, respectively and $4,855 of tax expense.

Net earnings for the year ended June 30, 2015 was $245 ($0.03) fully diluted share) compared to a net loss for the year ended June 30, 2014 of $545 (a loss of $0.06 earnings per fully diluted share) and net earnings of $4,488 ($0.48 earnings per fully diluted share) for the year ended June 30, 2013.

Adjusted Earnings Before Income Taxes, Interest, Depreciation and Amortization

Earnings before income taxes, interest, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) represent the sum of income before income taxes, interest, depreciation and amortization. We understand that certain industry analysts and investors generally consider EBITDA to be one measure of the liquidity of a company, and it is presented to assist analysts and investors in analyzing the ability of a company to generate cash, service debt and meet capital requirements. We believe increased EBITDA is an indicator of improved ability to service existing debt and to satisfy capital requirements. EBITDA, however, is not a measure of financial performance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and should not be considered an alternative to net income as a measure of operating performance or to cash liquidity. Because EBITDA is not a measure determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and is thus susceptible to varying calculations, EBITDA, as presented, may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other corporations. Where we adjust EBITDA for non-cash charges we refer to such measurement as “Adjusted EBITDA”, which we report on a company wide basis. Non-cash adjustments in Adjusted EBITDA are not intended to be identified or characterized in any respect as “non-recurring, infrequent or unusual,” if we believe such charge is reasonably likely to recur within two years, or if there was a similar charge (or gain) within the prior two years. Where we report Adjusted EBITDA, we typically also report Hospital Facilities Segment Adjusted EBITDA and Specialty Pharmacy Segment Adjusted EBITDA which is the EBITDA for the applicable segments without any allocation of corporate overhead, which we report as a separate line item, and without any allocation of the non-cash adjustments, which we also report as a separate line item in Adjusted EBITDA. Net cash provided by operations for the years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, is shown below.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

Our primary sources of liquidity are cash on hand and one facility-based revolving loan facility of $500, which has limited availability. Currently, the Company’s ability to raise capital (debt or equity) in the public or private markets on what it considers acceptable terms is uncertain. We are nevertheless seeking options to obtain financing for the Company’s liquidity needs. The Company and its subsidiaries currently are funding its working capital needs primarily from cash from operations and from the sale of additional assets. See “Subsidiary Loans” below.

59

Although continuing operations of the Company’s Healthcare Facilities and Specialty Pharmacy segments have improved in fiscal 2015 compared to the prior year, the Company believes its hospital facilities and its specialty pharmacy business continue to underperform. The Company has incurred losses from continuing operations in eleven of the last fifteen fiscal quarters through the quarter ending June 30, 2015.

Subject to the risks and uncertainties discussed herein, we believe we have adequate financing and liquidity to support our current level of operations through the next twelve months.

Subsidiary Loans

Trace RDA Loan and Trace Working Capital Loan—On July 11, 2012, SunLink and two wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company, closed on a $9,975 Mortgage Loan Agreement (“Trace RDA Loan”) and a Working Capital Loan Agreement, both dated as of July 5, 2012 (“Trace Working Capital Loan”).

The Trace RDA Loan has a term of 15 years with monthly payments of principal and interest until repaid. The Trace RDA Loan bears a floating rate of interest equal to the greater of (i) the prime rate (as published in The Wall Street Journal) plus 1.5%, or (ii) 6% (6.0% at June 30, 2015). The Trace RDA Loan is collateralized by real estate and equipment of Trace Regional Hospital in Houston, MS and is partially guaranteed under the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rural Development Business and Industry Program. Approximately $8,500 of the Trace RDA Loan proceeds was used to repay a portion of the Company’s then currently outstanding debt. Approximately $850 of the Trace RDA Loan proceeds were used for improvements to the hospital and its medical office building with the remainder of the loan proceeds used for working capital and closing costs.

The Trace Working Capital Loan as amended provides for a revolving line of credit to Trace equal to the lesser of (i) a Borrowing Base equal to eighty percent (80%) of Eligible Accounts Receivable (as defined in the Working Capital Loan Agreement dated July 5, 2012) or (ii) $500. The Trace Working Capital Loan expires July 2, 2016. It is subject to annual renewal at the discretion of the lender. At June 30, 2015 and 2014, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Trace Working Capital Loan.

The Trace RDA Loan contains various terms and conditions, including financial restrictions and limitations, and affirmative and negative covenants. The covenants include financial covenants measured on a quarterly basis which require our SHCH subsidiary to comply with a ratio of current assets to current liabilities, debt service coverage, fixed charge coverage, and funded debt to EBITDA, all as defined in the Trace RDA Loan. If Trace is unable to remain in compliance with the financial covenants, SHCH would cease to have a right to draw on the revolving working capital loan.

SHPP RDA Loan—On November 6, 2012, SunLink Healthcare Professional Property, LLC, a subsidiary of the Company, entered into and closed on a $2,100 term loan dated as of October 31, 2012 (the “SHPP RDA Loan”) with a bank. SHPP owns and leases a medical office building to Southern Health Corporation of Ellijay, Inc. (“SHC Ellijay”). SHC Ellijay owns and operates North Georgia Medical Center (“North Georgia”), located in Ellijay, Georgia.

The SHPP RDA Loan has a term of 25 years with monthly payments of principal and interest until repaid. The SHPP RDA Loan bears interest at a floating rate of interest equal to the greater of (i) the prime rate (as published in The Wall Street Journal) plus 2.0%, or (ii) 5% (5.25% at June 30, 2015). The SHPP RDA Loan is collateralized by SHPP’s real estate, equipment and leases and is partially guaranteed under the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rural Development Business and Industry Program. Of the SHPP RDA Loan proceeds, $1,800 was used by SHC Ellijay to acquire a medical office building in Ellijay, Georgia which was then sold to SHPP, with the remainder of the SHPP RDA Loan proceeds used by SHPP for working capital and closing costs. The SHPP RDA Loan contains certain financial covenants with respect to the ratio of current assets to current liabilities and debt service coverage, all as defined in the SHPP RDA Loan Agreement, which SHPP must maintain and that are measured at the end of each fiscal year. The SHPP RDA Loan is guaranteed by the Company and one subsidiary.

60

Carmichael Notes—On April 22, 2008, SunLink Scripts Rx, LLC issued a $3,000 promissory note with an interest rate of 8% to the former owners of Carmichael as part of the acquisition purchase price (the “Carmichael Purchase Note”). Under amendments and modifications to the Carmichael Note during fiscal 2013 and 2014, the Company made payments of principal and interest with additional notes and extended the maturity date to October 22, 2017. The Carmichael Note currently is payable in semi-annual installments of $185 of principal and accrued interest, with the remaining balance of $1,255 due October 22, 2017. The Carmichael Note is guaranteed by the Company.

Fulton RDA Loan—SunLink and two wholly-owned subsidiaries closed on a $5,000 Loan Agreement dated as of March 16, 2012 (the “Fulton RDA Loan”) with a bank. The Fulton RDA Loan was repaid in full on December 31, 2014 concurrent with the sale of Fulton.

Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Contingencies

Contractual obligations related to long-term debt, non-cancelable operating leases and interest on outstanding debt from continuing operations at June 30, 2015 is shown in the following table. The interest on variable interest debt is calculated at the interest rate in effect at June 30, 2015.

Physician Guarantees—At June 30, 2015, SunLink had a guarantee agreement with one physician. A physician with whom a guarantee agreement is made generally agrees to maintain his or her practice within a hospital geographic area for a specific period (normally three years) or be liable to repay all or a portion of the guarantee received. The physician’s liability for any guarantee repayment due to non-compliance with the provisions of a guarantee agreement generally is collateralized by the physician’s patient accounts receivable and/or a promissory note from the physician. All potential payments payable under this one guarantee have been paid as of June 30, 2015. SunLink expensed $67, $82, and $96, for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. There were no remaining non-cancelable commitments under guarantee agreements with physicians as of June 30, 2015.

Long-term Debt—At June 30, 2015, we had outstanding long-term debt of $12,405 of which $8,175 was incurred under the Trace RDA Loan, $1992 was incurred under the SHPP RDA Loan, $1,741 was incurred under the Carmichael Notes, and $137 was related to capital leases and other obligations.

Litigation—Office of Inspector General Investigation—In March 2013, SunLink received a document subpoena from the United States Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) in connection with an investigation of possible improper claims submitted to Medicare and Medicaid. The subpoena was directed to SunLink’s indirect subsidiary, Southern Health Corporation of Dahlonega, Inc. (“SHCD”), which owns and operates Chestatee Regional Hospital in Dahlonega, Georgia, and requested documents concerning possible false or fraudulent claims made for intensive outpatient psychiatric services provided by and billed for a third-party outpatient psychiatric service provider. The subpoena also sought information about SHCD’s relationship with the outpatient psychiatric service provider, including financial arrangements. SHCD cooperated with the government with respect to a document production, as well as by

61

conducting a joint medical necessity review of a sampling of medical records. In April 2015, we were advised by the OIG that the investigation as it relates to SHCD has been closed and that no action will be taken by the OIG against SHCD. Accordingly, the Company regards this matter as closed.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-3, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” (“ASU 2015-3”). ASU 2015-3 requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts, rather than separately as an asset. ASU 2015-3 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those years, and is to be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-3 will have an impact on its results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-2 “Consolidation” (“ASU 2015-2”). ASU 2015-2 includes amendments that are intended to improve targeted areas of consolidation for legal entities including reducing the number of consolidation models from four to two and simplifying the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”). The provisions of ASU 2015-2 are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The amendments may be applied retrospectively in previously issued financial statements for one or more years with a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first year restated. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2015-2 will have on its financial position, results of operation, cash flows and financial disclosures.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15 “Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern” (“ASU 2014-15”). ASU 2014-15 will explicitly require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and to provide related footnote disclosure in certain circumstances. The new standard will be effective for all entities in the first annual period ending after December 15, 2016. Earlier adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-15.

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, “Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity,” (“ASU 2014-08”). Under ASU 2014-08, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations that have a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results should be presented as discontinued operations. Additionally, ASU 2014-08 requires expanded disclosures about discontinued operations that will provide financial statement users with more information about the assets, liabilities, income, and expenses of discontinued operations. The amendments in ASU 2014-08 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014. However, ASU 2014-08 should not be applied to a component that is classified as held for sale before the effective date even if the component is disposed of after the effective date. Early adoption is permitted, but only for disposals (or classifications as held for sale) that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued. The effects of ASU 2014-08 will depend on any future disposals by the Company.

Related Party Transactions

A director of the Company and the Company’s secretary are members of two different law firms, each of which provides services to SunLink. The Company has expensed an aggregate of $334, $689 and $1,004 to these law firms in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2015 and 2014 is $89 and $115, respectively, of amounts payable to these law firms.

62

Inflation

During periods of inflation and labor shortages, employee wages increase and suppliers pass along rising costs to us in the form of higher prices for their supplies and services. We have not always been able to offset increases in operating costs by increasing prices for our services and products or by implementing cost control measures. We are unable to predict our ability to control future cost increases or offset future cost increases by passing along the increased cost to customers.

63

Index to Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Under the direction of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting and concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2015.

Disclosure controls and procedures and other procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports or submitted under the Exchange Act, such as this Annual Report on Form 10-K, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based on an evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures performed in connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2015.

Management’s Responsibility for Financial Statements

Our management is responsible for the integrity and objectivity of all information presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated financial statements contained herein were prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and include amounts based on management’s best estimates and judgments. Management believes the consolidated financial statements fairly reflect the form and substance of transactions and that the financial statements fairly represent the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which is composed solely of independent directors, meets regularly with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and representatives of management to review accounting, financial reporting, internal control and audit matters, as well as the nature and extent of the audit effort. The Audit Committee is responsible for the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm. The independent registered public accounting firm has free access to the Audit Committee.

64

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2015. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013). Based on our assessment we concluded that, as of June 30, 2015, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the last fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015, there has been no significant change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

65

PART IV

(a) (1) Financial Statements

The following consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries are set forth in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Consolidated Balance Sheets—June 30, 2015 and 2014.

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Earnings and Loss—For the Years Ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity—For the Years Ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—For the Years Ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—For the Years Ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

(a) (2) Financial Statement Schedules

The information required to be submitted in Schedules I, III, IV and V for SunLink Health Systems, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries has either been shown in the financial statements or notes, or is not applicable or not required under Regulation S-X and, therefore, has been omitted.

(a) (3) See Item 15(b) below. Each management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an Exhibit is identified below by an asterisk.

(b) Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed with this Form 10-K or incorporated herein by reference from the document set forth next to the exhibit in the list below. Exhibit numbers refer to Item 601 of Regulation S-K:

66

67

68

69

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, SunLink Health Systems, Inc. has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on this 25th day of September, 2015.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of SunLink Health Systems, Inc. and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

70

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Sun Link Health Systems, Inc.

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Sun Link Health Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2015 and 2014 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2015 and have issued our report thereon dated September 24, 2015; such consolidated financial statements and report are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Our audits also included the consolidated financial statement schedules of the Company, listed in Item 15 for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2015. These consolidated financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/s/ Cherry Bekaert LLP

Atlanta, Georgia

September 25, 2015

71

SUNLINK HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

(amounts in thousands)

72

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

73