SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS INC - Quarter Report: 2011 March (Form 10-Q)

 

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 001-33522

 

SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		20-2110031
(State of Incorporation)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
Three Riverway, Suite 300, Houston, Texas		77056
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (713) 579-0600

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report: N/A

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

As of May 9, 2011 there were 48,627,998 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $.01 per share, outstanding.

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART 1. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements			1
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2010 (unaudited)			1
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)			2
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 and the period from November 4, 2003 (inception) to March 31, 2011 (unaudited)			3
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 and the period from November 4, 2003 (inception) to March 31, 2011 (unaudited)			4
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the period from November 4, 2003 (inception) to March 31, 2011 (unaudited)			5
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)			6
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			21
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk			36
Item 4. Controls and Procedures			37
PART II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings			38
Item 1A. Risk Factors			38
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			38
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities			38
Item 4. [Removed and Reserved.]			38
Item 5. Other Information			38
Item 6. Exhibits			40
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2

PART I

Item 1.		Financial Statements

SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)

Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

		March 31,				June 30,
		2011				2010
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	29,423			$	42,573
Accounts receivable			2,591				2,672
Prepaid expenses and other currents assets			1,667				1,875
Inventory			1,182				983
Total current assets			34,863				48,103
Construction-in-progress			433				565
Property, plant and equipment, net			34,830				35,316
Intangible asset, net			1,234				1,272
Investment in Yima joint ventures			33,190				32,430
Other long-term assets			2,938				2,895
Total assets		$	107,488			$	120,581
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accrued expenses and accounts payable		$	5,292			$	7,008
Deferred revenue			—				522
Current portion of long-term bank loan			2,349				2,268
Total current liabilities			7,641				9,798
Long-term bank loan			4,637				6,744
Total liabilities			12,278				16,542
Equity:
Common stock, $0.01 par value: 200,000 shares authorized: 48,537 and 48,337 shares issued and outstanding, respectively			485				483
Additional paid-in capital			199,400				198,720
Deficit accumulated during development stage			(107,312	)			(96,449	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income			3,284				1,836
Total stockholders’ equity			95,857				104,590
Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries			(647	)			(551	)
Total equity			95,210				104,039
Total liabilities and equity		$	107,488			$	120,581

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)

Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)

		Three Months Ended
		March 31,
		2011				2010
Revenue:
Product sales and other — related parties		$	2,626			$	2,297
Technology licensing and related services			506				324
Total revenue			3,132				2,621
Costs and Expenses:
Costs of sales and plant operating expenses			2,384				2,736
General and administrative expenses			3,329				3,401
Project and technical development expenses			58				286
Stock-based compensation expense			312				741
Depreciation and amortization			653				666
Total costs and expenses			6,736				7,830
Operating loss			(3,604	)			(5,209	)
Non-operating (income) expense:
Equity in losses of Yima joint ventures			60				4
Foreign currency gains			(223	)			—
Interest income			(41	)			(38	)
Interest expense			196				178
Net loss			(3,596	)			(5,353	)
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests			37				72
Net loss attributable to stockholders		$	(3,559	)		$	(5,281	)
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted		$	(0.07	)		$	(0.11	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic and diluted			48,429				48,198

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)

Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)

										November 4, 2003
		Nine Months Ended								(inception) to
		March 31,								March 31,
		2011				2010				2011
Revenue:
Product sales and other — related parties		$	6,622			$	6,993			$	17,099
Technology licensing and related services			1,013				390				1,745
Other			—				146				521
Total revenue			7,635				7,529				19,365
Costs and Expenses:
Costs of sales and plant operating expenses			6,254				7,083				24,719
General and administrative expenses			9,646				9,403				59,100
Project and technical development expenses			187				1,840				11,242
Asset impairment losses			—				6,575				9,075
Stock-based compensation expense			577				1,706				20,337
Depreciation and amortization			1,983				2,107				8,993
Total costs and expenses			18,647				28,714				133,466
Operating loss			(11,012	)			(21,185	)			(114,101	)
Non-operating (income) expense:
Equity in losses of Yima joint ventures			286				54				325
Foreign currency (gain) loss			(719	)			1				(1,520	)
Interest income			(132	)			(90	)			(3010	)
Interest expense			512				522				2,529
Net loss			(10,959	)			(21,672	)			(112,425	)
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests			96				3,614				5,113
Net loss attributable to stockholders		$	(10,863	)		$	(18,058	)		$	(107,312	)
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted		$	(0.22	)		$	(0.37	)		$	(2.97	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic and diluted			48,403				48,228				36,110

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

										November 4, 2003
		Nine Months Ended								(inception) to
		March 31,								March 31,
		2011				2010				2011
Cash flows from operating activites:
Net loss		$	(10,959	)		$	(21,672	)		$	(112,425	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Stock-based compensation expense			577				1,706				20,337
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment			1,818				1,933				7,982
Amortization of intangible and other assets			165				174				1,011
Equity in losses of Yima joint ventures			286				54				325
Foreign currency gains			(719	)			—				(1,520	)
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment			—				3				136
Asset impairment losses			—				6,575				9,075
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable			168				(2,050	)			(2,495	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			254				77				24
Inventory			(164	)			(101	)			(1,141	)
Other long-term assets			(13	)			77				(1,243	)
Deferred revenue			(522	)			—				—
Accrued expenses and payables			(1,750	)			124				(771	)
Net cash used in operating activities			(10,859	)			(13,100	)			(80,705	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures			(55	)			(695	)			(38,011	)
Equity investment in Yima joint ventures			—				(29,288	)			(30,788	)
Purchase of marketable securities			—				—				(45,000	)
Redemption of marketable securities			—				—				45,000
GTI license royalty — Yima joint ventures			—				—				(1,500	)
ExxonMobil license royalty			—				—				(1,250	)
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets			—				—				7
Restricted cash — redemptions of certificates of deposit			—				50				(379	)
Amendment to GTI license rights			—				—				(500	)
Purchase of land use rights			—				(181	)			(1,896	)
Receipt of Chinese governmental grant			—				—				556
Project prepayments			—				—				(3,210	)
Net cash used in investing activities			(55	)			(30,114	)			(76,971	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments on long-term bank loan			(2,351	)			(2,256	)			(6,872	)
Proceeds from long-term bank loan			—				—				12,081
Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net			105				71				870
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net			—				—				174,981
Prepaid interest			—				—				(276	)
Financing costs			—				—				(143	)
Contributions from noncontrolling interest partners			—				839				4,456
Loans from shareholders			—				—				11
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities			(2,246	)			(1,346	)			185,108
Effect of exchange rates on cash			10				(11	)			1,991
Net increase (decrease) in cash			(13,150	)			(44,571	)			29,423
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period			42,573				90,420				—
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period		$	29,423			$	45,849			$	29,423

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)

Consolidated Statement of Equity
(In thousands)

														Deficit
														Accumulated				Accumulated
		Common Stock												During the				Other				Non-
						Common				Additional				Development				Comprehensive				controlling
		Shares				Stock				Paid-in Capital				Stage				Income				Interest				Total
Balance at November 4, 2003 (inception)			100,000			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—
Net loss for the period November 4, 2003 to June 30, 2004			—				—				—				—				—				—				—
Balance at June 30, 2004			100,000				—				—				—				—				—				—
Shares Forfeited in Merger			(94,000	)			—				—				—				—				—				—
Shares Issued in Merger			21,000				—				—				—				—				—				—
Net loss			—				—				—				(358	)			—				—				(358	)
Investor contributions			—				264				236				—				—				—				500
Conversion of debt to equity			—				6				5				—				—				—				11
Net proceeds from private placement offering			1,030				10				2,474				—				—				—				2,484
Balance at June 30, 2005			28,030				280				2,715				(358	)			—				—				2,637
Net loss			—				—				—				(5,183	)			—				—				(5,183	)
Net proceeds from private placement offering			970				10				2,378				—				—				—				2,388
Stock-based compensation			—				—				3,043				—				—				—				3,043
Adjustment related to return of shares			(4,353	)			(44	)			44				—				—				—				—
Balance at June 30, 2006			24,647				246				8,180				(5,541	)			—				—				2,885
Net loss			—				—				—				(13,142	)			—				(37	)			(13,179	)
Currency translation adjustment			—				—				—				—				175				—				175
Comprehensive loss			—				—				—				—				—				—				(13,004	)
Contributions from noncontrolling interest partners			—				—				—				—				—				492				492
Net proceeds from private placement offering			3,346				34				16,126				—				—				—				16,160
Stock-based compensation			—				—				6,608				—				—				—				6,608
Shares issued for amended GTI license			191				2				1,374				—				—				—				1,376
Shares issued upon option exercise by Union Charter Financial			2,000				20				4,980				—				—				—				5,000
Stock grants to employees			4				—				33				—				—				—				33
Balance at June 30, 2007			30,188				302				37,301				(18,683	)			175				455				19,550
Net loss			—				—				—				(27,442	)			—				(610	)			(28,052	)
Currency translation adjustment			—				—				—				—				1,390				—				1,390
Comprehensive loss			—				—				—				—				—				—				(26,662	)
Contributions from noncontrolling interest partners			—				—				—				—				—				3,124				3,124
Stock-based compensation			—				—				6,010				—				—				—				6,010
Exercise of stock options			92				1				564				—				—				—				565
Shares issued for GTI reservation use fee			278				3				2,497				—				—				—				2,500
Shares issued in public offerings			17,451				174				148,226				—				—				—				148,400
Stock grants to employees			2				—				19				—				—				—				19
Balance at June 30, 2008			48,011				480				194,617				(46,125	)			1,565				2,969				153,506
Net loss			—				—				—				(28,576	)			—				(703	)			(29,279	)
Currency translation adjustment			—				—				—				—				33				11				44
Comprehensive loss			—				—				—				—				—				—				(29,235	)
Public offering costs			—				—				(107	)			—				—				—				(107	)
Stock-based compensation			—				—				1,869				—				—				—				1,869
Exercise of stock options			107				1				62				—				—				—				63
Balance at June 30, 2009			48,118				481				196,441				(74,701	)			1,598				2,277				126,096
Net loss			—				—				—				(21,748	)			—				(3,667	)			(25,415	)
Currency translation adjustment			—				—				—				—				238				—				238
Comprehensive loss			—				—				—				—				—				—				(25,177	)
Contributions from noncontrolling interest partners			—				—				—				—				—				839				839
Stock-based compensation			—				—				2,179				—				—				—				2,179
Exercise of stock options			219				2				100				—				—				—				102
Balance at June 30, 2010			48,337				483				198,720				(96,449	)			1,836				(551	)			104,039
Net loss			—				—				—				(10,863	)			—				(96	)			(10,959	)
Currency translation adjustment			—				—				—				—				1,448				—				1,448
Comprehensive loss			—				—				—				—				—				—				(9,511	)
Stock-based compensation			—				—				577				—				—				—				577
Exercise of stock options			200				2				103				—				—				—				105
Balance at March 31, 2011			48,537			$	485			$	199,400			$	(107,312	)		$	3,284			$	(647	)		$	95,210

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(a) Organization and description of business

Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc. (“SES”), together with its wholly-owned and majority-owned controlled subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) is a development stage enterprise. The Company is an alternative energy technology company that provides advanced technology products and solutions to the energy and chemical industries. The Company builds, owns and operates coal gasification plants that utilize its proprietary U-GAS^® fluidized bed gasification technology to convert low rank coal and coal wastes into higher value energy products. The Company provides licenses, equipment components, engineering services and product offerings related to the U-GAS^® technology. The Company’s headquarters are located in Houston, Texas.

(b) Basis of presentation and principles of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements for the periods presented are unaudited and reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items, which management considers necessary for a fair statement. Operating results for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2011.

The consolidated financial statements are in U.S. dollars and include SES and all of its wholly-owned and majority-owned controlled subsidiaries. Noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries in the consolidated balance sheets represents minority stockholders’ proportionate share of the equity in such subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010. Significant accounting policies that are new or updated from those presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010 are included below. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial statements and do not include all annual disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Certain reclassifications have been made in prior period financial statements to conform to current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on net loss.

(c) Accounting for Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”) and Financial Statement Consolidation Criteria

The joint ventures which the Company enters into may be considered VIEs. The Company consolidates all VIEs where it is the primary beneficiary. This determination is made at the inception of the Company’s involvement with the VIE and is continuously assessed. The Company considers qualitative factors and forms a conclusion that the Company, or another interest holder, has a controlling financial interest in the VIE and, if so, whether it is the primary beneficiary. In order to determine the primary beneficiary, the Company considers who has the power to direct activities of the VIE that most significantly impacts the VIE’s performance and has an obligation to absorb losses from or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could be significant to the VIE. The Company does not consolidate VIEs where it is not the primary beneficiary. The Company accounts for these unconsolidated VIEs under the equity method of accounting and includes its net investment on its consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s equity interest in the net income or loss from its unconsolidated VIEs is recorded in non-operating (income) expense on a net basis on its consolidated statement of operations.

The Company has determined that the ZZ Joint Venture is a VIE and has determined that it is the primary beneficiary. In making the initial determination, the Company considered, among other items, the change in profit distribution between the Company and Hai Hua after 20 years. The expected negative variability in the fair value of the ZZ Joint Venture’s net assets was considered to be greater during the first 20 years of the ZZ Joint Venture’s life, which coincided with our original 95% profit/loss allocation, versus the latter 30 years in which the Company’s profit/loss allocation would be reduced to 10%. As the result of an amendment to the ZZ Joint Venture agreement in 2010, the profit distribution percentages will remain in place after the first 20 years, providing further support to the determination that the Company is the primary beneficiary. In addition, the Company considered whether the terms of the syngas purchase and sale agreement with Hai Hua contained a lease. The factors considered included (i) the Company’s ability to operate and control the plant during the initial 20 years; and (ii) whether it was more than remote that one or more parties other than Hai Hua would purchase more than a minor amount (considered to be 10%) of the plant’s output during the term of the syngas purchase and sale agreement. Because the Company determined that the syngas purchase and sale agreement did not contain a lease, the Company accounts for the revenues from that agreement in accordance with the Company’s revenue recognition policy for product sales.

The following tables provide additional information on the ZZ Joint Venture’s assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2010 which are consolidated within the Company’s consolidated balance sheets (in thousands):

		March 31, 2011
		Consolidated				ZZ Joint Venture (1)				% (2)
Current assets		$	34,863			$	4,055				12	%
Long-term assets			72,625				37,168				51	%
Total assets		$	107,488			$	41,223				38	%
Current liabilities		$	7,641			$	3,236				42	%
Long-term liabilities			4,637				4,637				100	%
Equity			95,210				33,350				35	%
Total liabilities and equity		$	107,488			$	41,223				38	%

		June 30, 2010
		Consolidated				ZZ Joint Venture (1)				% (2)
Current assets		$	48,103			$	5,198				11	%
Long-term assets			72,478				38,811				54	%
Total assets		$	120,581			$	44,009				36	%
Current liabilities		$	9,798			$	5,852				60	%
Long-term liabilities			6,744				6,744				100	%
Equity			104,039				31,413				30	%
Total liabilities and equity		$	120,581			$	44,009				36	%

The Company has determined that the Yima Joint Ventures are VIE’s and that Yima, the joint venture partner, is the primary beneficiary since Yima has a 75% ownership interest in the Yima Joint Ventures and has the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly influence the VIE’s performance.

The Company has determined that the GC Joint Venture is a VIE and has determined that it is the primary beneficiary since the Company has a 51% ownership interest in the GC Joint Venture and since there are no qualitative factors that would preclude the Company from being deemed the primary beneficiary. The Company consolidates the GC Joint Venture in its consolidated financial statements; however, as of June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2011, there were no significant assets or liabilities within the GC Joint Venture.

(d) Revenue Recognition

Revenue from sales of products, which includes the capacity fee and energy fee earned at the ZZ Joint Venture plant, and byproducts are recognized when the following elements are satisfied: (i) there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance; (ii) there is persuasive evidence that an agreement exists; (iii) delivery has occurred; (iv) the sales price is fixed or determinable; and (v) collectability is reasonably assured.

Technology licensing revenue is typically received and earned over the course of a project’s development. The Company may receive upfront licensing fee payments in addition to fees for engineering services that are integral to the initial transfer of its technology to a customer’s project. Typically, the majority of a license fee is received once project financing and equipment installation occur. Recognition of upfront licensing fee payments is deferred and recognized as a percentage of completion of the engineering services associated with the initial technology transfer. Further, such revenues are deferred until performance guarantee provisions have been met or until the license agreement is terminated. The Company recognizes revenue from engineering services under the percentage-of-completion method.

(e) Fair value measurements

Accounting standards require that fair value measurements be classified and disclosed in one of the following categories:

		Level 1		Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
		Level 2		Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and
		Level 3		Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).

The carrying value of the Company’s Other financial instruments including accounts receivable, accounts payable and long-term debt approximate their fair values.

The Company’s financial assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant for the fair value measurement. The following table summarizes the valuation of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities by pricing levels, as of March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2010 (in thousands):

		March 31, 2011
		Level 1				Level 2				Level 3				Total
Assets:
Certificates of Deposit		$	—			$	379	(1)		$	—			$	379
Money Market Funds			—				27,337	(2)			—				27,337

		June 30, 2010
		Level 1				Level 2				Level 3				Total
Assets:
Certificates of Deposit		$	—			$	379	(1)		$	—			$	379
Money Market Funds			—				38,624	(2)			—				38,624

(f) Comprehensive income (loss)

The Company’s comprehensive income (loss) was as follows (in thousands):

		Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
		March 31,								March 31,
		2011				2010				2011				2010
Net loss, as reported		$	(3,596	)		$	(5,353	)		$	(10,959	)		$	(21,672	)
Unrealized foreign currency translation adjustment			404				3				1,448				15
Comprehensive loss			(3,192	)			(5,350	)			(9,511	)			(21,657	)
Less comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests			37				72				96				3,614
Comprehensive loss attributable to the Company		$	(3,155	)		$	(5,278	)		$	(9,415	)		$	(18,043	)

Note 2 — Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to the disclosure requirement related to fair value measurements. The amendment requires new disclosures related to transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 and activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. A reporting entity is required to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. Additionally, in the reconciliation for fair value measurements in Level 3, a reporting entity must present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross, rather than net, basis. The new disclosures were effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not anticipate that its adoption of this amendment will have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2009, the FASB also issued an amendment to the accounting and disclosure requirements for the consolidation of VIEs. This amendment requires an enterprise to perform a qualitative analysis when determining whether or not it must consolidate a VIE. The amendment also requires an enterprise to continuously reassess whether it must consolidate a VIE. Additionally, the amendment requires enhanced disclosures about an enterprise’s involvement with VIEs and any significant change in risk exposure due to that involvement, as well as how its involvement with VIEs impacts the enterprise’s financial statements. Finally, enterprises are required to disclose significant judgments and assumptions used to determine whether or not to consolidate a VIE. This amendment was adopted by the Company effective as of July 1, 2010 and adoption of the standard has not impacted the entities which the Company consolidates. The only impact is additional disclosure in the financial statements. See Note 1 for disclosures regarding the Company’s involvement with VIEs.

In June 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting and disclosure requirements for transfers of financial assets. This amendment applies to the financial reporting of a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows; and a transferor’s continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. It eliminates (1) the exceptions for qualifying special-purpose entities from the consolidation guidance and (2) the exception that permitted sale accounting for certain mortgage securitizations when a transferor has not surrendered control over the transferred financial assets. The requirements in the amendment must be applied to transfers occurring on or after the effective date. The Company’s adoption of these requirements as of July 1, 2010 had no effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In July 2010, the FASB issued guidance for the disclosures about the credit quality of financing receivables and the allowance for credit losses. This guidance amends existing disclosure guidance to require an entity to provide a greater level of disaggregated information about the credit quality of its financing receivables and its allowance for credit losses. This guidance is effective for fiscal and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company’s adoption of these requirements effective January 1, 2011 had no effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2010, the FASB issued accounting guidance for the milestone method of revenue recognition. This guidance allows entities to make a policy election to use the milestone method of revenue recognition and provides guidance on defining a milestone and the criteria that should be met for applying the milestone method. The scope of this guidance is limited to transactions involving milestones relating to research and development deliverables. The guidance includes enhanced disclosure requirements about each arrangement, individual milestones and related contingent consideration, information about substantive milestones and factors considered in the determination. The Company’s adoption of this guidance effective July 1, 2010 had no effect on the Company’s financial statements.

The FASB issued new guidance relating to revenue recognition for contractual arrangements with multiple revenue-generating activities. The ASC Topic for revenue recognition includes identification of a unit of accounting and how arrangement consideration should be allocated to separate the units of accounting, when applicable. The Company’s adoption of this guidance effective July 1, 2010 had no effect on the Company’s financial statements.

Note 3 — Current Projects

Zao Zhuang Joint Venture

Joint Venture Agreement

On July 6, 2006, the Company entered into a cooperative joint venture contract with Shandong Hai Hua Coal & Chemical Company Ltd. (“Hai Hua”), which established Synthesis Energy Systems (Zao Zhuang) New Gas Company Ltd. (the “ZZ Joint Venture”), a joint venture company that has the primary purposes of (i) developing, constructing and operating a syngas production plant utilizing the U-GAS^® technology in Zao Zhuang City, Shandong Province, China and (ii) producing and selling syngas and the various byproducts of the plant, including ash and elemental sulphur. We own 95.8% of the ZZ Joint Venture and Hai Hua owns the remaining 4.2%. The Company consolidates the results of the ZZ Joint Venture in its consolidated financial statements.

Syngas Purchase and Sale Agreement

The ZZ Joint Venture is also party to a purchase and sale agreement with Hai Hua for syngas produced by the plant, whereby Hai Hua will pay the ZZ Joint Venture an energy fee and capacity fee, as described below, based on the syngas production. The syngas to be purchased by Hai Hua is subject to certain quality component requirements set forth in the contract. In late December 2008, the plant declared commercial operations status for purposes of the purchase and sale agreement. The energy fee is a per normal cubic meters, or Ncum, of syngas calculation based on a formula which factors in the monthly averages of the prices of design base coal, coke, coke oven gas, power, steam and water, all of which are components used in the production of syngas. The capacity fee is paid based on the capacity of the plant to produce syngas, factoring in the number of hours (i) of production and (ii) of capability of production as compared to the guaranteed capacity of the plant, which for purposes of the contract is 22,000 Ncum per hour of net syngas. Hai Hua is obligated to pay the capacity fee regardless of whether they use the gasification capacity, subject only to availability of the plant, quality of the syngas and exceptions for certain events of force majeure. Due to worldwide reductions in methanol prices, as well as realiability issues with respect to Hai Hua’s plant, Hai Hua has operated at a reduced rate of syngas consumption. Hai Hua has used approximately 35% to 45% of the syngas guarantee capacity since 2009.

In April 2009, the ZZ Joint Venture entered into a Supplementary Agreement with Hai Hua, amending the terms of the purchase and sale agreement. The Supplementary Agreement was entered into to provide more clarity regarding the required syngas quality and volume to be delivered, recovery of the energy fee during turndown periods and operations coordination during unscheduled outages. Under the Supplementary Agreement, the syngas quality specification was amended to provide more clarity as to the minor constituents allowable in the syngas. For purposes of the Supplemental Agreement, syngas that meets these specifications is deemed “compliant gas” and syngas that does not meet these specifications is deemed “non-compliant gas.” The Supplementary Agreement also added a requirement for Hai Hua to pay the ZZ Joint Venture the capacity fee and 70% of the energy fee for all non-compliant gas which is taken by Hai Hua. However, if more than 50% of the syngas taken by Hai Hua during any operating day is non-compliant gas, all of the syngas for that day is deemed to be non-compliant gas for purposes of calculating the energy fee. In addition, the Supplementary Agreement accommodates periods of turndown operation by Hai Hua by establishing a minimum threshold gas off take volume of 7,500 Ncum per hour of net syngas for the purpose of calculating the energy fee during such periods. The Supplementary Agreement also provides that, to the extent Hai Hua has an unscheduled shutdown, and the plant continues to operate on standby during such period, Hai Hua is still required to pay the energy fee to the ZZ Joint Venture. In the event that the plant has an unscheduled shutdown and does not provide at least three hours prior notice to Hai Hua, the ZZ Joint Venture may be required to provide certain compensation to Hai Hua.

To date, Hai Hua has been unable to offtake the volume of syngas originally expected for the original plant design and the plant has incurred operating losses. The Company does not foresee this situation changing significantly in the near term, although Hai Hua has indicated that they may be able to increase their syngas consumption if the Company is able to alter the composition of the produced syngas to fit Hai Hua’s needs. In an effort to improve the return on its investment in this plant, the company is evaluating alternative products and partnership structures for a possible expansion of the ZZ Joint Venture plant. In February 2010, the Company received the necessary government approval for the expansion. This approval, along with the previously received environmental approvals, are the key approvals required to commence execution of the expansion and also describe certain terms of the expansion project, including but not limited to, its use of land, the main additional facilities required and the use of the existing facilities. The scope of the expansion is still under evaluation. The local government has expressed strong support for this expansion project and has executed a letter of intent allowing a new state-owned local coal mine to be used as a debt guarantee. The letter of intent also contemplates providing discounted coal to the project from this local coal mine. The Company is in discussions with several potential partners on this expansion.

Due to the business climate, the recessionary trends that have significantly affected commodity prices including methanol, and the ZZ Joint Venture plant’s operating losses to-date, the Company believed an impairment assessment of the plant’s assets was warranted. As of March 31, 2011, the Company performed an analysis of this project and has determined that these assets were not impaired based upon management’s estimated cash flow projections for the project. If the Company is not successful in improving the ZZ Joint Venture’s profitability, or if management’s estimated cash flow projections for these assets decrease, or if Hai Hua does not make its required payments, the plant’s assets could become impaired.

Loan Agreement

On March 22, 2007, the ZZ Joint Venture entered into a seven-year loan agreement and received $12.6 million of loan proceeds pursuant to the terms of a Fixed Asset Loan Contract with the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (“ICBC”) to complete the project financing for the ZZ Joint Venture. Key terms of the Fixed Asset Loan Contract with ICBC are as follows:

•

Term of the loan is seven years from the commencement date (March 22, 2007) of the loan;

•

Interest is adjusted annually based upon the standard rate announced each year by the People’s Bank of China, and as of March 31, 2011, the applicable interest rate was 6.6% and is payable monthly;

•

Principal payments of RMB 7.7 million (approximately $1.2 million based on current currency exchange rates) are due in March and September of each year beginning on September 22, 2008 and ending on March 31, 2014;

•

Hai Hua is the guarantor of the entire loan;

•

Assets of the ZZ Joint Venture are pledged as collateral for the loan;

•

Covenants include, among other things, prohibiting pre-payment without the consent of ICBC and permitting ICBC to be involved in the review and inspection of the Zao Zhuang plant; and

•

Subject to customary events of default which, should one or more of them occur and be continuing, would permit ICBC to declare all amounts owing under the contract to be due and payable immediately.

As of March 31, 2011, the ZZ Joint Venture was in compliance with all covenants and obligations under the Fixed Asset Loan Contract.

Yima Joint Ventures

In August 2009, the Company entered into amended joint venture contracts with Yima Coal Industry (Group) Co., Ltd. (“Yima”), replacing the prior joint venture contracts entered into in October 2008 and April 2009. The joint ventures were formed for each of the gasification, methanol/methanol protein production, and utility island components of the plant (collectively, the “Yima Joint Ventures”). The parties obtained government approvals for the project’s feasibility study during the three months ended December 31, 2008 and for the project’s environmental impact assessment during the three months ended March 31, 2009, which were the two key approvals required to proceed with the project. The amended joint venture contracts provide that: (i) the Company and Yima contribute equity of 25% and 75%, respectively, to the Yima Joint Ventures; (ii) Yima will guarantee the repayment of loans from third party lenders for 50% of the project’s cost and, if debt financing is not available, Yima is obligated to provide debt financing via shareholder loans to the project until the project is able to secure third-party debt financing; and (iii) Yima will supply coal to the project from a mine located in close proximity to the project at a preferential price subject to a definitive agreement to be subsequently negotiated. In connection with entering into the amended contracts, the Company and Yima contributed their remaining cash equity contributions of $29.3 million and $90.8 million, respectively, to the Yima Joint Ventures during the three months ended September 30, 2009. The Company will also be responsible for its share of any cost overruns on the project. During the three months ended September 30, 2009, the Company incurred a charge of $0.9 million relating to consulting fees paid in connection with the closing and funding of the Yima project.

In exchange for their capital contributions, the Company owns a 25% interest in each joint venture and Yima owns a 75% interest. Notwithstanding this, in connection with an expansion of the project, the Company has the option to contribute a greater percentage of capital for the expansion, such that as a result, the Company would have up to a 49% ownership interest in the Yima Joint Ventures. The investment in the Yima Joint Ventures is accounted for using the equity method.

During the three months ended September 30, 2010, Yima expressed their intent to convert the existing project from methanol production to glycol production. Yima has communicated their belief that the prospect for strong economic performance of the plant can be improved by modifying the backend of the project to make glycol. In addition, Yima has acquired a nearby coal to methanol facility and is looking to diversify and sees glycol as a potentially more profitable alternative. The Company has indicated to Yima that it would be willing to support this scope change if both parties can agree upon appropriate modifications to the joint venture contracts that can improve the Company’s overall risk and return without requiring any additional capital investment from the Company. Yima’s project management team believes that the project’s syngas production facilities will be brought online in mid-2012 as per the original schedule for commercial operation. Although the schedule for glycol production is currently under evaluation, Yima is taking steps to connect the syngas production facility with their east and west coal chemical zones to provide an outlet for syngas sales prior to glycol production. The Company is continuing to have discussions with Yima to restructure the agreements as necessary to achieve these goals.

Construction of the utilities and gasification portions of the plant are on schedule. The remaining construction and commissioning for the project’s syngas production facilities is expected to take approximately twelve to fifteen additional months. Yima is the project management leader for the project and has indicated their belief that the change in the scope of the project would not delay this schedule; however, the construction of the methanol portion of the plant is on hold pending the revisions for the possible glycol production. Based on the project’s current scope of methanol only, the current estimate of the total required capital of the project is approximately $250 million. The remaining capital for the project is to be provided by project debt to be obtained by the Yima Joint Ventures. Yima has agreed to guarantee the project debt in order to secure debt financing from domestic Chinese banking sources. The Company has agreed to pledge to Yima its ownership interests in the joint ventures as security for its obligations under any project guarantee. In the event that the debt financing is not obtained, Yima has agreed to provide a loan to the joint ventures to satisfy the remaining capital needs of the project with terms comparable to current market rates at the time of the loan.

The Yima Joint Ventures are governed by a board of directors consisting of eight directors, two of whom were appointed by the Company and six of whom were appointed by Yima. The joint ventures also have officers that are nominated by the Company, Yima and/or the board of directors pursuant to the terms of the joint venture contracts. The Company and Yima shall share the profits, and bear the risks and losses, of the joint ventures in proportion to our respective ownership interests. The term of the joint venture shall commence upon each joint venture company obtaining its business license and shall end 30 years after commercial operation of the plant.

The Company has included the $1.5 million payment paid to the Gas Technology Institute (“GTI”) in June 2009 toward future royalties due to GTI for the Yima Joint Ventures’ project as part of the Company’s investment in the Yima project. An additional future royalty payment of approximately $1.5 million will be due to GTI upon the commissioning of the gasifier equipment for the Yima project.

The Company’s equity in losses of the Yima Joint Ventures for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were $0.3 million and $54,000, respectively. The following table presents summarized unconsolidated financial information for the Yima Joint Ventures (in thousands):

		Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
		March 31,								March 31,
		2011				2010				2011				2010
Income statement data:
Revenue		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—
Operating loss			497				337				1,533				836
Net loss			241				17				1,144				216

		March 31,				June 30,
		2011				2010
Balance sheet data:
Current assets		$	87,463			$	118,073
Noncurrent assets			54,978				11,694
Current liabilities			15,462				6,046
Noncurrent liabilities			—				—

Golden Concord Joint Venture

The Company’s joint venture with Golden Concord (“GC Joint Venture”) was formed to (i) develop, construct and operate a coal gasification, methanol and dimethyl either (“DME”) production plant utilizing U-GAS^® technology in the Xilinghote Economic and Technology Development Zone, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China and (ii) produce and sell methanol, DME and the various byproducts of the plant. The Company has a 51% ownership interest in the GC Joint Venture and consolidates the results of the GC Joint Venture in its consolidated financial statements.

The Company continues to seek development partners for this project and has shifted its focus to include end products such as SNG, glycol, olefins, methanol and DME that can be economically produced from local low rank coal when utilizing the U-GAS^® technology and which are of strategic interest to possible partners in China, including state owned, private and publicly traded gas companies. The Company has also entered into a cooperation agreement with a local Chinese company who has assisted with obtaining certain necessary government approvals and who may desire to continue the development of the project.

Note 4 — GTI License Agreement

On November 5, 2009, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated License Agreement (the “New Agreement”) with GTI, replacing the Amended and Restated License Agreement between the Company and GTI dated August 31, 2006, as amended, or the Original Agreement. Under the New Agreement, the Company maintains its exclusive worldwide right to license the U-GAS^® technology for all types of coals and coal/biomass mixtures with coal content exceeding 60%, as well as the non-exclusive right to license the U-GAS^® technology for 100% biomass and coal/biomass blends exceeding 40% biomass. The New Agreement differs from the Old Agreement most critically by allowing the Company to sublicense U-GAS^® to third parties for coal, coal and biomass mixtures or 100% biomass projects (subject to the approval of GTI, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld), with GTI to share the revenue from such third party licensing fees based on an agreed percentage split (the “Agreed Percentage”). In addition, the prior obligation to fabricate and put into operation at least one U-GAS^® system for each calendar year of the Original Agreement in order to maintain the license has been eliminated in the New Agreement.

In order to sublicense any U-GAS^® system, the Company is required to comply with certain requirements set forth in the New Agreement. In the preliminary stage of developing a potential sublicense, the Company is required to provide notice and certain information regarding the potential sublicense to GTI and GTI is required to provide notice of approval or non-approval within ten business days of the date of the notice from the Company, provided that GTI is required to not unreasonably withhold their approval. If GTI does not respond within that ten business day period, they are deemed to have approved of the sublicense. The Company is required to provide updates on any potential sublicenses once every three months during the term of the New Agreement. The Company is also restricted from offering a competing gasification technology during the term of the New Agreement.

For each U-GAS^® unit which the Company licenses, designs, builds or operates for itself or for a party other than a sublicensee and which uses coal or a coal and biomass mixture or biomass as the feed stock, the Company must pay a royalty based upon a calculation using the MMBtu per hour of dry syngas production of a rated design capacity, payable in installments at the beginning and at the completion of the construction of a project (the “Standard Royalty”). Although it is calculated using a different unit of measurement, the Standard Royalty is effectively the same as the royalty payable to GTI under the Original Agreement. If the Company invests, or has the option to invest, in a specified percentage of the equity of a third party, and the royalty payable by such third party for their sublicense exceeds the Standard Royalty, the Company is required to pay to GTI the Agreed Percentage of such royalty payable by such third party. However, if the royalty payable by such third party for their sublicense is less than the Standard Royalty, the Company is required to pay to GTI, in addition to the Agreed Percentage of such royalty payable by such third party, the Agreed Percentage of its dividends and liquidation proceeds from its equity investment in the third party. In addition, if the Company receives a carried interest in a third party, and the carried interest is less than a specified percentage of the equity of such third party, the Company is required to pay to GTI, in its sole discretion, either (i) the Standard Royalty or (ii) the Agreed Percentage of the royalty payable to such third party for their sublicense, as well as the Agreed Percentage of the carried interest. The Company will be required to pay the Standard Royalty to GTI if the percentage of the equity of a third party that the Company (a) invests in, (b) has an option to invest in, or (c) receives a carried interest in, exceeds the percentage of the third party specified in the preceding sentence.

The Company is required to make an annual payment to GTI for each year of the term beginning December 31, 2010, with such annual payment due by the last day of January of the following year; provided, however, that the Company is entitled to deduct all royalties paid to GTI in a given year under the New Agreement from this amount, and if such royalties exceed the annual payment amount in a given year, the Company is not required to make the annual payment. The Company accrues the annual royalty expense ratably over the calendar year as adjusted for any royalties paid during year. The Company must also provide GTI with a copy of each contract that it enters into relating to a U-GAS^® system and report to GTI with its progress on development of the technology every six months.

For a period of ten years, the Company and GTI are restricted from disclosing any confidential information (as defined in the New Agreement) to any person other than employees of affiliates or contractors who are required to deal with such information, and such persons will be bound by the confidentiality provisions of the New Agreement. The Company has further indemnified GTI and its affiliates from any liability or loss resulting from unauthorized disclosure or use of any confidential information that the Company receives.

The term of the New Agreement is the same as the Original Agreement, expiring on August 31, 2016, but may be extended for two additional ten-year periods at the Company’s option.

Note 5 — Stock-Based Compensation

As of March 31, 2011, the Company had outstanding stock option and restricted stock awards granted under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2005 Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Plan”) exercisable for 4,736,371 shares of common stock. As of March 31, 2011, 975,995 shares were authorized for future issuance pursuant to the Plan and approximately $1.0 million of expense with respect to non-vested stock-based awards has yet to be recognized.

Stock option activity during the nine months ended March 31, 2011 was as follows:

		Shares of Common
		Stock Underlying
		Stock Options
Outstanding at June 30, 2010			6,037,573
Granted			1,060,496
Exercised			(200,500	)
Forfeited			(528,864	)
Outstanding at March 31, 2011			6,368,705
Exercisable at March 31, 2011			4,736,371

The fair values for the stock options granted during the nine months ended March 31, 2011 were estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes-Morton option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions.

Risk-free rate of return			2.22	%
Expected life of award			5.6 years
Expected dividend yield			0.00	%
Expected volatility of stock			109	%
Weighted-average grant date fair value			0.84

Note 6 — Net Loss Per Share

Historical net loss per share of common stock is computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Basic loss per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Stock options are the only potential dilutive share equivalents the Company has outstanding for the periods presented. For the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 and the period from November 4, 2003 (inception) to March 31, 2011, options to purchase common stock were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share as their effect would have been antidilutive as the Company incurred net losses during those periods.

Note 7 — Risks and Uncertainties

Any future decrease in economic activity in China, India or in other regions of the world, in which the Company may in the future do business, could significantly and adversely affect its results of operations and financial condition in a number of other ways. Any decline in economic conditions may reduce the demand or prices from the products from our plants. In addition, the market for commodities such as methanol has been under significant pressure and the Company is unsure of how much longer this pressure will continue. As a direct result of these trends, the Company’s ability to finance and develop its existing projects, commence any new projects and sell its products could be adversely impacted. Credit markets in China have also continued to tighten recently, as inflation has caused the Chinese government to raise interest rates for the third time in four months and there is evidence of similar trends in the Indian credit markets.

The Company will limit the development of any further projects until it has assurances that acceptable financing is available to complete such projects. In addition, as of March 31, 2011, Hai Hua is the Company’s only customer for syngas sales and as such, it is exposed to significant customer credit risk due to this concentration. The Company’s revenue and results of operations would be adversely affected if it is unable to retain Hai Hua as a customer or secure new customers. Even if the Company does obtain the necessary capital for its projects, the Company could face other delays in its projects due to additional approval requirements or due to unanticipated issues in the commissioning of such a project. These factors have led to the impairment of the GC Joint Venture’s assets and could lead to, among other things, the impairment of the Company’s significant assets, including its assets in the ZZ Joint Venture and its investment in the Yima Joint Ventures, and an inability to develop any further projects.

The Company may need to raise additional capital through equity and debt financing for any new projects that are developed, to support its existing projects and possible expansions thereof and for its corporate general and administrative expenses. The Company cannot provide any assurance that any financing will be available to the Company in the future on acceptable terms or at all. Any such financing could be dilutive to the Company’s existing stockholders. If the Company cannot raise required funds on acceptable terms, it may not be able to, among other things, (i) maintain its general and administrative expenses at current levels; (ii) negotiate and enter into new gasification plant development contracts; (iii) expand its operations; (iv) hire and train new employees; or (v) respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated capital requirements.

As of December 31, 2010, the Company was not in compliance with the minimum bid price requirement for continued listing on the NASDAQ Stock Market (the “NASDAQ”). The Company regained compliance with the minimum bid price rule during January 2011 as the closing bid price of the common stock met or exceed $1.00 per share for a minimum of ten consecutive business days during the grace period provided by NASDAQ. The Company has maintained compliance with the minimum bid price requirements since January 2011.

Note 8 — Litigation

In September 2008, the Company was named as one of a number of defendants in a lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Southern Division, by Igor Olenicoff, one of its former stockholders, and a company he controls. Also named were Timothy E. Vail (our former CEO and one of the Company’s directors), David Eichinger (the Company’s former CFO), and another one of the Company’s directors (collectively, the Company, Mr. Vail, Mr. Eichinger and the director are referred to as the “SES Defendants”), as well as UBS AG, Union Charter Ltd., and other persons who allegedly managed Mr. Olenicoff’s investments outside the U.S. The SES Defendants have been named in this lawsuit based primarily upon allegations that one of our former stockholders, Teflomi Trade & Trust, Inc., was a shell company formed for the purposes of holding Mr. Olenicoff’s assets overseas, and that the SES Defendants allegedly had knowledge of this arrangement. The claims initially asserted against the SES Defendants included, among others, securities fraud in violation of Rule 10b-5 under the Securities Act and the California state law equivalent, violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, common law fraud and negligent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, conspiracy and unfair business practices. On the SES Defendants’ motion, on July 31, 2009, the court issued an order dismissing the securities fraud claims as to each of the SES Defendants and the common law fraud, negligent misrepresentation claim and breach of fiduciary duty claims as to us, Mr. Vail and Mr. Eichinger. The court determined that certain other claims, including RICO, conspiracy and unfair business practices, were sufficiently pled and could proceed at this stage. Plaintiffs were given leave to amend and, on August 24, 2009, filed an amended complaint attempting to replead their securities fraud claims, and alleged a new claim for violation of the Uniform Commercial Code (the “UCC”). In response, on September 23, 2009, the SES Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the securities fraud and UCC claims. The court heard oral argument on the SES Defendants’ motion to dismiss, and on various other defendants’ motions to dismiss, on November 9, 2009. On March 16, 2010, the court issued an order on the pending motions to dismiss, dismissing the securities fraud and UCC claims as to each of the SES Defendants. Thus, the claims that remain as to the SES Defendants collectively include violations of RICO, RICO conspiracy, unfair business practices, conversion and civil conspiracy; the claims that remain as to the individually named director include fraudulent misrepresentation, constructive fraud, negligent misrepresentation and breach of fiduciary duty. The SES Defendants filed their answer to these claims on April 22, 2010. The parties are currently engaged in discovery related to those claims the court has allowed to remain in the case. The court has set a trial date of February 7, 2012. The SES Defendants believe the claims alleged against them to be without merit and intend to continue to vigorously defend all claims which are allowed to proceed in the court.

Note 9 — Share Purchase Agreement with ZJX

On March 31, 2011, the Company entered into a Share Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with China Energy Industry Holdings Group Co, Ltd. (“China Energy”) and Zhongjixuan Investment Management Company Ltd. (“ZJX”), pursuant to which the Company will issue on the closing date to China Energy 37,254,475 shares of its Common Stock, in exchange for approximately $83.8 million (the “Consideration”). Within 20 business days after the accomplishment of the Milestone (as defined below), the Company shall further issue directly to China Energy an amount of shares of Common Stock which, when combined with the shares issued on the closing date, equals 60.0% of the outstanding Common Stock on a fully-diluted basis. The terms and conditions of the Agreement are summarized below.

Issuance of Shares

On the closing date for the Agreement, the Company will issue 37,254,475 shares of Common Stock (the “Closing Shares”) in exchange for the Consideration. Within 20 business days after the accomplishment of the Milestone (as defined below), the Company will issue to China Energy additional shares of Common Stock (the “Milestone Shares”) which, when combined with the Closing Shares, equals 60.0% of the issued and outstanding Common Stock on a fully-diluted basis, including shares reserved for future issuance pursuant to the Company’s incentive plan, as of the date that the Milestone is achieved.

For the purpose of the Agreement, the “Milestone” will be deemed to be achieved if the average closing price of the Common Stock for 20 consecutive trading days equals or exceeds $8.00 per share (the “Threshold Price”), provided that the 20 consecutive trading day period will begin upon the occurrence of both (i) ZJX/China Energy undertaking best endeavours to secure the projects as described below under “Post-Closing Covenants and Agreements — Project Development” and (ii) the expiration of six months after the Closing Date.

In the event that the Milestone is not achieved within a five year period commencing on the Closing Date (such five years plus any extensions granted under the Agreement is referred to as the “Deadline”), and no Target Projects (as defined below) are secured by ZJX for the Company by the Deadline, the Company shall then have the sole discretion to extend or not extend the Deadline. If ZJX has secured Target Projects for the Company prior to the Deadline, but the Milestone has not been achieved by the Deadline, the Company shall agree to extend the period to achieve the Milestone by one year for each Target Project secured by ZJX for the Company, provided that the Deadline will not be extended beyond 10 years from the Closing Date. If the Deadline is not extended, ZJX/China Energy’s rights to the Milestone Shares shall be relinquished.

For the purpose of the above, a “Target Project” shall mean either (i) the execution of a joint venture agreement, and other ancillary and necessary documents, related to the formation of an MJV (as defined below under “Post-Closing Covenants and Agreements — Project Development”), or (ii) securing for the Company a coal resource project that is already in operation, a new coal chemical project or any other project that is approved by the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”), each with a total investment of at least RMB1.5 billion.

In the event that the Milestone is achieved but, pursuant to restriction or non-approval by any U.S. governmental agency or regulatory authority, (i) the issuance of the Milestone Shares to China Energy is prevented from occurring or (ii) the ownership of the Milestone Shares by China Energy is required to be divested, the Company shall be required to seek qualified third parties to purchase the right of China Energy to the Milestone Shares. If this does not occur within twelve (12) months of the date of the action of such U.S. governmental agency or competent regulatory authority, the Company shall compensate ZJX/China Energy for the Milestone Shares by making a payment in an amount equal to $2.00 per share for each Milestone Share, representing full satisfaction of any obligation of the Company to ZJX with respect to the Milestone Shares. Such payment may be made by the Company to China Energy in the form of cash or an equivalent amount of the Company’s assets in China.

Use of Proceeds

Subject to the discretion and approval of the Board, the Consideration, net of costs and expenses, is required to be applied to the following: (i) incorporation of a Company headquarters in China to consolidate the ownership of the Company’s investment projects in China and enhance the Company’s presence in China; (ii) investing in the expansion of the ZZ Joint Venture; (iii) investing in Phase I of the Company’s Yima Joint Ventures; (iv) acquiring an ownership interest in a coal mine that will provide coal to the Yima Joint Ventures; (v) investing in the GC Joint Venture; (vi) other Chinese projects that may be recommended to the Board from time to time; and (vii) other expenses of the operation and business of the Company in China.

ZJX will use reasonable endeavours to assist the Company to obtain third party funding (third party direct equity investment in projects or debt financing to the projects) to (a) cover funding needs of the above projects; (b) provide funding for the Company to invest in future phases of the Yima joint venture project; (c) invest in strategic coal resources in China connected to the Company’s projects; and (d) provide funding for the Company to invest in other projects in China not listed above and assist the Company to obtain third party investment in any of the Company’s other projects.

Other

Closing of the transaction with China Energy and ZJX is subject to approval by the Company’s shareholders and other customary closing conditions.

Although the Company is still in process of determining the financial statement impact resulting from China Energy’s contingent right to receive the Milestone Shares, the Company expects that the estimated fair value of this contingent right will be reported as a liability on its consolidated balance sheet at closing of the transaction. The Company also expects that this liability will be adjusted prospectively to reflect the change in the estimated fair value of the contingent right. Changes in the liability are expected to be recorded in earnings of the respective period. The financial statement reporting of this liability is expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and potentially have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations depending on the outcome of future valuations of the contingent right.

In the event that the Milestone Shares are issued, all of the Company’s non-vested stock-based awards would become fully vested and immediately exercisable under the terms of the Company’s Plan.

Note 10 — Income Taxes

At June 30, 2010, the Company had approximately $31.2 million of U.S. federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards, and $29.9 million of China NOL carryforwards. The U.S. federal NOL carryforwards have expiration dates through the year 2028. The China NOL carry forwards have expiration dates through 2014. The utilization of U.S. federal NOLs and other tax attributes may be limited due to changes in ownership from future equity offerings.

Note 11 — Segment Information

The Company’s reportable operating segments have been determined in accordance with the Company’s internal management reporting structure and include the ZZ Joint Venture plant operations, technology licensing and related services, and corporate and other. The corporate and other segment includes the Company’s investment in the Yima Joint Ventures. The Company evaluates performance based upon several factors, of which a primary financial measure is segment operating income (loss).

The following table presents the revenue, operating loss and total assets by segment (in thousands):

		Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
		March 31,								March 31,
		2011				2010				2011				2010
Revenue:
ZZ Joint Venture plant		$	2,628			$	2,297			$	6,904			$	6,510
Technology licensing and related services			504				324				731				390
Corporate & other			—				—				—				629
Total revenue		$	3,132			$	2,621			$	7,635			$	7,529
Operating loss:
ZZ Joint Venture plant			(553	)			(1,000	)			(1,268	)			(2,734	)
Technology licensing and related services			(83	)			(1,004	)			(1,109	)			(2,988	)
Corporate & other			(2,968	)			(3,205	)			(8,635	)			(15,463	)
Total operating loss		$	(3,604	)		$	(5,209	)		$	(11,012	)		$	(21,185	)

		March 31,				June 30,
		2011				2010
Assets:
ZZ Joint Venture plant		$	41,223			$	44,009
Technology licensing and related services			1,204				1,255
Corporate & other			65,061				75,317
Total assets		$	107,488			$	120,581

Item 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this quarterly report. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this quarterly report, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business and related financing, include forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should review the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis.

Business Overview

We are a global energy and gasification technology company that provides products and solutions to the energy and chemical industries. Our strategy is to create value through providing technology and equipment in regions where low rank coals and biomass feedstocks can be profitably converted into high value products through our proprietary U-GAS^® fluidized bed gasification technology. We do this through providing a proprietary technology package whereby we license U-GAS^® technology rights to third parties, deliver an engineered technology package and provide proprietary equipment components to customers who have contracted to own and operate projects. In addition, we may (i) integrate our U-GAS^® technology package with downstream technologies to provide a fully integrated offering where we may invest in projects either directly or through an investment partner, (ii) partner with engineering, equipment and technology companies to provide our U-GAS^® technology package into an integrated modular product offering, (iii) provide technology to enable coal resources to be integrated together with our U-GAS^® technology where the coal resources may be of little value without our U-GAS^® conversion technology, or (iv) acquire or partner with owners of these coal resources to create more value and opportunity for us through the integration of our technology with the coal resources.

We believe that we have several advantages over commercially available competing gasification technologies, such as entrained flow, fixed and moving bed gasification technologies, including our ability to use all ranks of coals (including low rank, high ash and high moisture coals, which are significantly cheaper than higher grade coals), many coal waste products and biomass feed stocks. In addition, U-GAS^® technology’s advanced fluidized bed design is tolerant to changes in feedstock. These factors enable us to be a lower cost producer of synthesis gas, or syngas, a mixture of primarily hydrogen and carbon monoxide, which can then be used to produce other products. Depending on local market need and fuel sources, syngas can be used as a fuel gas in industrial applications or can be used to produce many products including power, synthetic natural gas, or SNG, methanol, dimethyl ether, or DME, glycol, ammonia, direct reduction iron, or DRI, synthetic gasoline, steam, and other byproducts (e.g., sulphur, carbon dioxide or ash).

Our principal operating activities are currently in China, however, we are developing opportunities in other countries including India, the U.S. and Australia, as well as other parts of Asia and Europe. Our ZZ Joint Venture project is our first commercial scale coal gasification plant located in Shandong Province, China and has been in operation since February 2008 and in commercial operation since December 2008. Our Yima project is currently under construction in Henan Province, China.

The key elements of our business strategy include:

•

Executing on existing projects in China. We are continuing to implement operational measures to improve the financial performance of our ZZ Joint Venture plant in the near term, while also continuing to evaluate alternatives to better position the project to be commercially and financially successful in the future. These alternatives include the possible expansion of the plant to produce other products for other customers. We also intend to continue to leverage our success to date at the ZZ Joint Venture in our ongoing business development efforts, including through further visits from senior executives of possible customers and partners, as well as government officials, from China, India, Australia, Vietnam and the United States. We are also continuing the ongoing construction of our Yima project, and are working to restructure our joint venture agreements to change the scope of the project from methanol to glycol production.

•

Leveraging our proprietary technology through licensing, equipment sales and related services to increase revenues and position us for future growth. We provide a proprietary technology package whereby we license U-GAS® technology rights to third parties, deliver an engineered technology package and provide proprietary equipment components to customers who have contracted to own and operate projects. We intend to focus on developing opportunities for our proprietary technology package whereby we may (i) integrate our U-GAS® technology package with downstream technologies to provide a fully integrated offering where we may invest in projects either directly or through an investment partner or (ii) may partner with engineering, equipment and technology companies to provide our U-GAS® technology package into an integrated modular product offering, which may include coal or biomass feedstocks for units producing power and fuels such as SNG, methanol to gasoline, or MTG, diesel and ethanol as well as methanol for gasoline blending. We anticipate that we can increase revenues through collecting technology licensing fees and royalties, engineering and technical service fees, as well as equipment product sales sold to customers who have contracted to own and operate projects and desire to incorporate our proprietary technology. We also believe that our licensing activities will provide additional insight into project development activities, which may allow us to make selective equity investments in such projects in the future, develop integrated, modular product offerings, or take options in projects for which we provide a license.

•

Expanding our relationships with strong strategic partners. Our efforts have been initially focused on facilities producing syngas, methanol and DME in China. We are expanding our relationships with our current partners and developing new relationships, including through our transaction with ZJX and China Energy and through possible strategic joint ventures for specific markets, with partners that can help us expand our business. Such strategic relationships may include an investment in projects either directly by us or through an investment partner where U-GAS® plants may supply syngas to strategic customers via long-term offtake agreements. For example, we are working with Midas Resource Partners AG, a coal resource consulting and project development firm, to collaborate on project origination and project development activities for integrated coal resource-gasification projects to incentivize third party investors to commit to providing financing for such projects. We are also developing new downstream coal-to-chemicals and coal-to-energy products which may expand our initial focus to include facilities producing SNG, MTG, glycol, power and reducing gas for the steel industry. We are exploring new markets for entry such as India, the U.S., Australia, and other parts of Asia and Europe.

•

Developing value where we have a competitive advantage and have access of rights to feedstock resources. We believe that we have the greatest competitive advantage using our U-GAS® technology in situations where there is a ready source of low rank, low cost coal, coal waste or biomass to utilize as a feedstock. We are focusing our efforts in countries with large low rank coal resources such as India, the U.S., China, Australia and South Africa. We are working to develop structured transactions that include securing options to these feedstock resources. For example, we are currently in discussions regarding several projects in Inner Mongolia, China where the provincial government is making coal resources available to the project owners which adds protection for the project from future coal cost increases, as well as potentially increasing project revenues. In these cases, we may provide technology to add value to coal resources which may be of little value without our U-GAS® conversion technology or may acquire or partner with owners of these resources to create more value and opportunity for us through the integration of our technology with the resources. Additionally, where strategic relationships and capital and/or financing is available, we may acquire an interest in such resources, including existing facilities or coal mines, where we could create value with our U-GAS® technology through securing greater access to feedstock.

•

Continue to develop and improve U-GAS® technology. We are continually seeking to improve the overall plant availability, plant efficiency rates and fuel handling capabilities of the existing U-GAS® gasification technology. We are continuing to work with our prospective customers to determine the suitability of their low rank coals for our U-GAS® technology through our proprietary coal characterization testing as well as selective commercial scale testing in our ZZ Joint Venture plant. In addition, we are growing our technology base through continued development of know-how with our engineering and technical staff, growing and protecting our trade secrets as well as through patenting improvements tested at our ZZ Joint Venture plant, and improvements resulting from integration of our technology with downstream processes. One example includes the development of our Fines Management System which we believe can maximize the utilization of low rank coal in our U-GAS®-based gasifiers, and as a result, improve the cost advantages derived from using our technology. We have filed several patent applications relating to our improvements to the U-GAS® technology.

•

Grow earnings through increased revenues and control of expenses. We remain intently focused on control of our expenses while we grow revenues from our technology business. We believe our strategy will allow us to grow near term revenues to position us for sustainable long term growth. We intend to minimize project development expense on projects until we have assurances that acceptable financing is available to complete the project. Until we have such assurances, our strategy will be to operate using our current capital resources and to leverage the resources of strategic relationship or financing partners.

Results of Operations

We are in our development stage and therefore have had limited operations. We generated revenues of $7.6 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and $19.4 million since our inception in November 2003. We have sustained net losses of approximately $107.3 million since our inception. We have primarily financed our operations to date through private placements and two public offerings of our common stock.

Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010

Revenue. Total revenue increased to $3.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $2.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010.

Product sales were $2.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $2.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and were derived from the sale of syngas and byproducts produced at the ZZ Joint Venture plant to Hai Hua. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the plant operated for 72% and 80% of the period, respectively, and the plant’s availability for production was 100% and 96%, respectively.

Technology licensing and related services revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were $0.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively. The technology licensing and related services revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2011 resulted from the recognition of previously deferred revenues received under a license agreement entered into in April 2010 which has since been terminated due to the licensee’s inability to obtain financing for its project.

Costs of sales and plant operating expenses. Costs of sales and plant operating expenses decreased by $0.3 million to $2.4 million for the for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $2.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 due primarily to increased efficiency in coal conversion to syngas at the ZZ Joint Venture plant.

General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses decreased by $0.1 million to $3.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $3.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction in consulting and corporate personnel costs offset, in part, by increased business development costs including travel and professional fees.

Project and technical development expenses. Project and technical development expenses decreased by $0.2 million to $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. Costs during the three months ended March 31, 2010 included advanced analytical flow modeling and other technical support of the U-GAS^® technology.

Stock-based compensation expense. Stock-based compensation expense decreased by $0.4 million to $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The decrease was principally due to forfeitures of certain awards and due to the fair values of recent stock option awards being lower than the fair values of certain prior awards as a result of the decrease in the price of our common stock since 2008.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense was $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 and was primarily related to depreciation of our ZZ Joint Venture plant’s assets.

Equity in losses of Yima Joint Ventures. The equity in losses of the Yima Joint Ventures for the three months ended March 31, 2011 relates to our 25% share of the losses incurred by the Yima Joint Ventures. The losses are comprised of non-capitalizable costs incurred during the design and construction phase, offset in part, by interest income earned on invested funds contributed by us and Yima. The losses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 increased due primarily to a government subsidy received by the Yima Joint Ventures during the three months ended March 31, 2010 which offset the losses during that quarter.

Foreign currency gain. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we recognized a foreign currency gain of $0.2 million due to the appreciation of the Renminbi Yuan relative to the U.S. dollar.

Interest expense. Interest expense was $0.2 million for both of the three month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. Our interest expense relates primarily to our long term debt comprised of the ZZ Joint Venture’s outstanding principal balance on its loan with the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, or ICBC.

Nine Months Ended March 31, 2011 Compared to the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2010

Revenue. Total revenue increased by $0.1 million to $7.6 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $7.5 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010.

Product sales were $6.6 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $7 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and were derived from the sale of syngas and byproducts produced at the ZZ Joint Venture plant to Hai Hua. For the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the plant operated for 59% and 73% of the period, respectively, and the plant’s availability for production was 99% and 94%, respectively.

Technology licensing and related services revenues for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were $1.0 million and $0.4 million, respectively, and were generated from the recognition of previously deferred revenues received under a license agreement entered into in April 2010 which has since been terminated due to the licensee’s inability to obtain financing for its project, and the testing of coal at the ZZ Joint Venture plant, and other coal testing, feasibility studies and other technical services provided in association with our technology licensing business.

There were no other revenues for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and there were $0.1 million other revenues for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and were primarily for a sponsorship grant received for lignite testing at ZZ Joint Venture plant.

Costs of sales and plant operating expenses. Costs of sales and plant operating expenses decreased by $0.8 million to $6.3 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $7.1 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 due primarily to increased efficiency in coal conversion to syngas at the ZZ Joint Venture plant.

General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased by $0.2 million to $9.6 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $9.4 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2010. The increase was primarily due to royalties due to GTI starting in calendar year 2010 and increased travel and professional fees related to licensing and other business development activities, offset in part by a reduction in other corporate personnel costs.

Project and technical development expenses. Project and technical development expenses decreased to $0.2 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $1.8 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010. Project development expenses for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 included a $0.9 million charge for a consulting fee related to the financial closing of the Yima project and other technical support and development costs of biomass gasification in the U.S.

Stock-based compensation expense. Stock-based compensation expense decreased to $0.6 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $1.7 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010. The decrease was principally due to forfeitures of certain awards and due to the fair values of recent stock option awards being lower than the fair values of certain prior awards as a result of the decrease in the price of our common stock since 2008.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by $0.1 million to $2.0 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $2.1 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and was primarily related to depreciation of our ZZ Joint Venture plant’s assets.

Asset impairment loss. The asset impairment loss of $6.6 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2010 related to the write-off of the long-lived assets of our joint venture with Golden Concord.

Equity in losses of Yima Joint Ventures. The equity in losses of the Yima Joint Ventures for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 relates to our 25% share of the losses incurred by the Yima Joint Ventures. The losses ares comprised of non-capitalizable costs incurred during the design and construction phase, offset in part, by interest income earned on invested funds contributed by us and Yima. The losses for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 increased due to higher personnel and land lease related costs.

Foreign currency gain. During the nine months ended March 31, 2011, we recognized a foreign currency gain of $0.7 million due to the appreciation of the Renminbi Yuan relative to the U.S. dollar.

Interest expense. Interest expense was $0.5 million for both of the nine month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. Our interest expense relates primarily to our long term debt comprised of the ZZ Joint Venture’s outstanding principal balance on its loan with ICBC.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We are in our development stage and have financed our operations to date through private placements of our common stock in 2005 and 2006 and two public offerings, one in November 2007 and one in June 2008. We have used the proceeds of these offerings for the development of our joint ventures in China and to pay other development and general and administrative expenses. In addition, we have entered into a loan agreement with ICBC to fund certain of the costs of the ZZ Joint Venture.

As of March 31, 2011, we had approximately $29.4 million in cash and cash equivalents and approximately $27.2 million of working capital available to us. During the nine months ended March 31, 2011, we used approximately $10.9 million in operating activities, $55,000 in investing activities for capital expenditures, and $2.3 million in financing activities primarily for the scheduled semi-annual principal payments on the ZZ Joint Venture’s loan with ICBC.

Share Purchase Agreement with ZJX

On March 31, 2011, we entered into a Share Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with China Energy Industry Holdings Group Co, Ltd. (“China Energy”) and Zhongjixuan Investment Management Company Ltd. (“ZJX”), pursuant to which we will issue on the closing date to China Energy 37,254,475 shares of our Common Stock, in exchange for approximately $83.8 million (the “Consideration”). Within 20 business days after the accomplishment of the Milestone (as defined below), we shall further issue directly to China Energy an amount of shares of Common Stock which, when combined with the shares issued on the closing date, equals 60.0% of the outstanding Common Stock on a fully-diluted basis. The terms and conditions of the Agreement are summarized in Note 9 to the financial statements.

Use of Proceeds

Subject to the discretion and approval of the Board, the Consideration, net of costs and expenses, is required to be applied to the following: (i) incorporation of a Company headquarters in China to consolidate the ownership of our investment projects in China and enhance our presence in China; (ii) investing in the expansion of our Zao Zhuang joint venture; (iii) investing in Phase I of our Yima joint ventures; (iv) acquiring an ownership interest in a coal mine that will provide coal to the Yima joint venture project; (v) investing in our Golden Concord joint venture; (vi) other Chinese projects that may be recommended to the Board from time to time; and (vii) other expenses of the operation and business of us in China.

ZJX will use reasonable endeavours to assist us to obtain third party funding (third party direct equity investment in projects or debt financing to the projects) to (a) cover funding needs of the above projects; (b) provide funding for us to invest in future phases of the Yima joint venture project; (c) invest in strategic coal resources in China connected to our projects; and (d) provide funding for us to invest in other projects in China not listed above and assist us to obtain third party investment in any of our other projects.

Project Development

ZJX will use reasonable endeavours to create at least four project joint ventures (the “MJVs”) in the areas of synthetic natural gas, methanol to gasoline; fertilizer; and electric power. Funding for each MJV is expected to be approximately RMB20 billion. Each MJV is expected to be funded with equity from a strategic investor plus project debt. We are anticipated to be part owner of each MJV through a targeted 35% carry provided by the strategic investor as part of our development of and provision of technology for the particular projects. ZJX will help us work with the strategic investors to obtain long term purchase commitments for each of the MJVs prior to the start of construction of each such project.

Closing of the transaction with China Energy and ZJX is subject to approval by the Company’s shareholders and other customary closing conditions.

Zao Zhuang Joint Venture

Joint Venture Agreement

On July 6, 2006, we entered into a cooperative joint venture contract with Shandong Hai Hua Coal & Chemical Company Ltd., or Hai Hua, which established Synthesis Energy Systems (Zao Zhuang) New Gas Company Ltd., or the ZZ Joint Venture, a joint venture company that has the primary purposes of (i) developing, constructing and operating a syngas production plant utilizing the U-GAS^® technology in Zao Zhuang City, Shandong Province, China and (ii) producing and selling syngas and the various byproducts of the plant, including ash and elemental sulphur. We own 95.8% of the ZZ Joint Venture and Hai Hua owns the remaining 4.2%. We consolidate the results of the ZZ Joint Venture in our consolidated financial statements.

Syngas Purchase and Sale Agreement

The ZZ Joint Venture is also party to a purchase and sale agreement with Hai Hua for syngas produced by the plant, whereby Hai Hua will pay the ZZ Joint Venture an energy fee and capacity fee, as described below, based on the syngas production. The syngas to be purchased by Hai Hua is subject to certain quality component requirements set forth in the contract. In late December 2008, the plant declared commercial operations status for purposes of the purchase and sale agreement. The energy fee is a per normal cubic meters, or Ncum, of syngas calculation based on a formula which factors in the monthly averages of the prices of design base coal, coke, coke oven gas, power, steam and water, all of which are components used in the production of syngas. The capacity fee is paid based on the capacity of the plant to produce syngas, factoring in the number of hours (i) of production and (ii) of capability of production as compared to the guaranteed capacity of the plant, which for purposes of the contract is 22,000 Ncum per hour of net syngas. Hai Hua is obligated to pay the capacity fee regardless of whether they use the gasification capacity, subject only to availability of the plant, quality of the syngas and exceptions for certain events of force majeure. Due to worldwide reductions in methanol prices, as well as realiability issues with respect to Hai Hua’s plant,Hai Hua has operated at a reduced rate of syngas consumption. Hai Hua has used approximately 35% to 45% of the syngas guarantee capacity since 2009.

In April 2009, the ZZ Joint Venture entered into a Supplementary Agreement with Hai Hua, amending the terms of the purchase and sale agreement. The Supplementary Agreement was entered into to provide more clarity regarding the required syngas quality and volume to be delivered, recovery of the energy fee during turndown periods and operations coordination during unscheduled outages. Under the Supplementary Agreement, the syngas quality specification was amended to provide more clarity as to the minor constituents allowable in the syngas. For purposes of the Supplementary Agreement, syngas that meets these specifications is deemed “compliant gas” and syngas that does not meet these specifications is deemed “non-compliant gas.” The Supplementary Agreement also added a requirement for Hai Hua to pay the ZZ Joint Venture the capacity fee and 70% of the energy fee for all non-compliant gas which is taken by Hai Hua. However, if more than 50% of the syngas taken by Hai Hua during any operating day is non-compliant gas, all of the syngas for that day is deemed to be non-compliant gas for purposes of calculating the energy fee. In addition, the Supplementary Agreement accommodates periods of turndown operation by Hai Hua by establishing a minimum threshold gas off take volume of 7,500 Ncum per hour of net syngas for the purpose of calculating the energy fee during such periods. The Supplementary Agreement also provides that, to the extent Hai Hua has an unscheduled shutdown, and the plant continues to operate on standby during such period, Hai Hua is still required to pay the energy fee to the ZZ Joint Venture. In the event that the plant has an unscheduled shutdown and does not provide at least three hours prior notice to Hai Hua, the ZZ Joint Venture may be required to provide certain compensation to Hai Hua.

To date, Hai Hua has been unable to offtake the volume of syngas originally expected for the original plant design and the plant has incurred operating losses. We do not foresee Hai Hua’s volume offtake changing significantly in the near term, although Hai Hua has indicated that they may be able to increase their syngas consumption if we are able to alter the composition of the produced syngas to fit Hai Hua’s needs. In an effort to improve the return on our investment in this plant, we are evaluating alternative products and partnership structures for a possible expansion of the ZZ Joint Venture plant to produce products such as glycol. In February 2010, we received the necessary government approval for the expansion. This approval, along with the previously received environmental approvals, are the key approvals required for us to commence execution of the expansion and also describe certain terms of the expansion project, including but not limited to, its use of land, the main additional facilities required and the use of the existing facilities. The scope of the expansion is still under evaluation. We are also continuing to evaluate alternatives to improve the financial performance of the ZZ Joint Venture. The local government has expressed strong support for this expansion project and has executed a letter of intent allowing a new state-owned local coal mine to be used as a debt guarantee. The letter of intent also contemplates providing discounted coal to the project from this local coal mine. We are in discussions with several potential partners on this expansion.

Yima Joint Ventures

In August 2009, we entered into amended joint venture contracts with Yima Coal Industry (Group) Co., Ltd., or Yima, replacing the prior joint venture contracts entered into in October 2008 and April 2009. The joint ventures were formed for each of the gasification, methanol/methanol protein production, and utility island components of the plant, or collectively, the Yima Joint Ventures. We obtained government approvals for the project’s feasibility study during the three months ended December 31, 2008 and for the project’s environmental impact assessment during the three months ended March 31, 2009, which were the two key approvals required to proceed with the project. The amended joint venture contracts provide that: (i) we and Yima contribute equity of 25% and 75%, respectively, to the Yima Joint Ventures; (ii) Yima will guarantee the repayment of loans from third party lenders for 50% of the project’s cost and, if debt financing is not available, Yima is obligated to provide debt financing via shareholder loans to the project until the project is able to secure third-party debt financing; and (iii) Yima will supply coal to the project from a mine located in close proximity to the project at a preferential price subject to a definitive agreement to be subsequently negotiated. In connection with entering into the amended contracts, we and Yima have contributed our remaining cash equity contributions of $29.3 million and $90.8 million, respectively, to the Yima Joint Ventures during the three months ended September 30, 2009. We will also be responsible for our share of any cost overruns on the project. During the three months ended September 30, 2009, we incurred a charge of $0.9 million relating to consulting fees paid in connection with the closing and funding of the Yima project.

In exchange for the capital contributions, we own a 25% interest in each joint venture and Yima owns a 75% interest. Notwithstanding this, in connection with an expansion of the project, we have the option to contribute a greater percentage of capital for the expansion, such that as a result, we would have up to a 49% ownership interest in the Yima Joint Ventures. The investment in the Yima Joint Ventures is accounted for using the equity method.

During the three months ended September 30, 2010, Yima expressed their intent to convert the existing project from methanol production to glycol production. Yima has communicated their belief that the prospect for strong economic performance of the plant can be improved by modifying the backend of the project to make glycol. In addition, Yima has acquired a nearby coal to methanol facility and is looking to diversify and sees glycol as a potentially more profitable alternative. We have indicated to Yima that we would be willing to support this scope change if both parties can agree upon appropriate modifications to the joint venture contracts that can improve our overall risk and return without requiring any additional capital investment from us. Yima’s project management team believes that the project’s syngas production facilities will be brought online in mid-2012 as per the original schedule for commercial operation. Although the schedule for glycol production is currently under evaluation, Yima is taking steps to connect the syngas production facility with their east and west coal chemical zones to provide an outlet for syngas sales prior to glycol production. We are continuing to have discussions with Yima to restructure the agreements as necessary to achieve these goals.

Construction of the utilities and gasification portions of the plant are on schedule. The remaining construction and commissioning for the project’s syngas production facilities is expected to take approximately twelve to fifteen additional months. Yima is the project management leader for the project and has indicated their belief that the change in the scope of the project would not delay this schedule; however, the construction of the methanol portion of the plant is on hold pending the revisions for the possible glycol production. Based on the project’s current scope of methanol only, the current estimate of the total required capital of the project is approximately $250 million. The remaining capital for the project is to be provided by project debt to be obtained by the Yima Joint Ventures. Yima has agreed to guarantee the project debt and we expect this guarantee will allow debt financing to be obtained from domestic Chinese banking sources. We have agreed to pledge to Yima our ownership interests in the joint ventures as security for its obligations under any project guarantee. In the event that the debt financing is not obtained, Yima has agreed to provide a loan to the joint ventures to satisfy the remaining capital needs of the project with terms comparable to current market rates at the time of the loan.

The Yima Joint Ventures are governed by a board of directors consisting of eight directors, two of whom were appointed by us and six of whom were appointed by Yima. The joint ventures also have officers that are nominated by us, Yima and/or the board of directors pursuant to the terms of the joint venture contracts. We and Yima shall share the profits, and bear the risks and losses, of the joint ventures in proportion to our respective ownership interests. The term of the joint venture shall commence upon each joint venture company obtaining its business license and shall end 30 years after commercial operation of the plant.

Golden Concord Joint Venture

Our joint venture with Golden Concord, or the GC Joint Venture, was formed to (i) develop, construct and operate a coal gasification, methanol and DME production plant utilizing U-GAS^® technology in the Xilinghote Economic and Technology Development Zone, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China and (ii) produce and sell methanol, DME and the various byproducts of the plant. We have a 51% ownership interest in the GC Joint Venture and we consolidate the results of the GC Joint Venture in our consolidated financial statements. We have funded a total of $3.4 million of our required equity contribution and Golden Concord has additionally funded approximately $3.1 million of its equity contribution as of June 30, 2010. These funds were used for engineering and initial construction work for this project, land use rights, and for its development expenses.

We continue to seek development partners for this project and have shifted our focus to include end products such as SNG, glycol, olefins, methanol and DME that can be economically produced from local low rank coal when utilizing the U-GAS^® technology and which are of strategic interest to possible partners in China, including state owned, private and publicly traded gas companies. We have also entered into a cooperation agreement with a local Chinese company who has assisted with obtaining certain necessary government approvals and who may desire to continue the development of the project.

GTI Agreements

License Agreement

On November 5, 2009, we entered into an Amended and Restated License Agreement, or the New Agreement, with GTI, replacing the Amended and Restated License Agreement between us and GTI dated August 31, 2006, as amended, or the Original Agreement. Under the New Agreement, we maintain our exclusive worldwide right to license the U-GAS^® technology for all types of coals and coal/biomass mixtures with coal content exceeding 60%, as well as the non-exclusive right to license the U-GAS^® technology for 100% biomass and coal/biomass blends exceeding 40% biomass. The New Agreement differs from the Old Agreement most critically by allowing us to sublicense U-GAS^® to third parties for coal, coal and biomass mixtures or 100% biomass projects (subject to the approval of GTI, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld), with GTI to share the revenue from such third party licensing fees based on an agreed percentage split, or the Agreed Percentage. In addition, the prior obligation to fabricate and put into operation at least one U-GAS^® system for each calendar year of the Original Agreement in order to maintain the license has been eliminated in the New Agreement.

In order to sublicense any U-GAS^® system, we are required to comply with certain requirements set forth in the New Agreement. In the preliminary stage of developing a potential sublicense, we are required to provide notice and certain information regarding the potential sublicense to GTI and GTI is required to provide notice of approval or non-approval within ten business days of the date of the notice from us, provided that GTI is required to not unreasonably withhold their approval. If GTI does not respond within that ten business day period, they are deemed to have approved of the sublicense. We are required to provide updates on any potential sublicenses once every three months during the term of the New Agreement. We are also restricted from offering a competing gasification technology during the term of the New Agreement.

For each U-GAS^® unit which we license, design, build or operate for ourself or for a party other than a sublicensee and which uses coal or a coal and biomass mixture or biomass as the feed stock, we must pay a royalty based upon a calculation using the MMBtu per hour of dry syngas production of a rated design capacity, payable in installments at the beginning and at the completion of the construction of a project, or the Standard Royalty. Although it is calculated using a different unit of measurement, the Standard Royalty is effectively the same as the royalty payable to GTI under the Original Agreement. If we invest, or have the option to invest, in a specified percentage of the equity of a third party, and the royalty payable by such third party for their sublicense exceeds the Standard Royalty, we are required to pay to GTI the Agreed Percentage of such royalty payable by such third party. However, if the royalty payable by such third party for their sublicense is less than the Standard Royalty, we are required to pay to GTI, in addition to the Agreed Percentage of such royalty payable by such third party, the Agreed Percentage of our dividends and liquidation proceeds from our equity investment in the third party. In addition, if we receive a carried interest in a third party, and the carried interest is less than a specified percentage of the equity of such third party, we are required to pay to GTI, in our sole discretion, either (i) the Standard Royalty or (ii) the Agreed Percentage of the royalty payable to such third party for their sublicense, as well as the Agreed Percentage of the carried interest. We will be required to pay the Standard Royalty to GTI if the percentage of the equity of a third party that we (a) invest in, (b) have an option to invest in, or (c) receive a carried interest in, exceeds the percentage of the third party specified in the preceding sentence.

We are required to make an annual payment to GTI for each year of the term beginning December 31, 2010, with such annual payment due by the last day of January of the following year; provided, however, that we are entitled to deduct all royalties paid to GTI in a given year under the New Agreement from this amount, and if such royalties exceed the annual payment amount in a given year, we are not required to make the annual payment. We must also provide GTI with a copy of each contract that we enter into relating to a U-GAS^® system and report to GTI with our progress on development of the technology every six months.

For a period of ten years, we and GTI are restricted from disclosing any confidential information (as defined in the New Agreement) to any person other than employees of affiliates or contractors who are required to deal with such information, and such persons will be bound by the confidentiality provisions of the New Agreement. We have further indemnified GTI and its affiliates from any liability or loss resulting from unauthorized disclosure or use of any confidential information that we receive.

The term of the New Agreement is the same as the Original Agreement, expiring on August 31, 2016, but may be extended for two additional ten-year periods at our option.

Outlook

We expect to continue to have negative operating cash flows until we can generate sufficient revenues from our licensing and related service projects, as well as from the ZZ Joint Venture, the Yima Joint Ventures and other projects which are under development, to cover our general and administrative expenses and other operating costs.

We currently plan to use our available cash for (i) our general and administrative expenses; (ii) debt service related to the ZZ Joint Venture; (iii) working capital; (iv) project, third-party licensing and technical development expenses; and (v) general corporate purposes. The actual allocation of and the timing of the expenditures will be dependent on various factors, including changes in our strategic relationships, commodity prices and industry conditions, and other factors that we cannot currently predict. In particular, any future decrease in economic activity in China or in other regions of the world in which we may in the future do business could significantly and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition in a number of other ways. In addition, the market for commodities such as methanol has been under significant pressure and we are unsure of how much longer this pressure will continue. As a direct result of these trends, our ability to finance and develop our existing projects, commence any new projects and sell our products could be adversely impacted.

We are pursuing possible U-GAS^® licensing opportunities with third parties allowing us to build on our experience at the ZZ Joint Venture and our technology and engineering capability. We intend to place increased focus on development of licensing opportunities for our proprietary U-GAS^® technology on a global basis with a focus on India, the U.S., China, Australia and South Africa due to their large low rank coal resources.

Our strategy is to create value by providing technology and equipment in regions where low rank coals and biomass feedstocks can be profitably converted into high value products through our proprietary U-GAS^® fluidized bed gasification technology. We do this through providing a proprietary technology package whereby we license U-GAS^® technology rights to third parties, deliver an engineered technology package and provide proprietary equipment components to customers who have contracted to own and operate projects. In the U.S., we believe there may be a near-term opportunity for us to leverage the capability of U-GAS^® to efficiently gasify biomass to make renewable fuels. Today’s regulatory environment in the U.S. is favorable for these types of projects because increased environmental concerns are creating a market demand for renewable fuels and companies are under increasing pressure to reduce their carbon footprint. We anticipate that we can generate revenues through engineering and technical service fees, as well as licensing fees and royalties on products sold by our licensees that incorporate our proprietary technology without incurring the significant capital costs required to develop a plant. We also believe that our licensing activities will provide additional insight into project development activities, which may allow us to make selective equity investments in such projects in the future and also the development of integrated, modular product offerings. In addition, we are continuing to improve our technology in ways that we believe will improve our ability to further develop our licensing activities. For example, in December 2010, we successfully implemented our Fines Management System, or FMS, which is a new technology for which we have filed a patent that relates to recovering energy remaining in the fines resulting from the gasification process. Using FMS, we are now achieving over 90-day continuous runs on each single gasifier, which allows us to achieve very high availability of syngas due to our spare stem gasifier configuration. With FMS, we believe that we can maximize the utilization of low rank coal in our U-GAS^® -based gasifiers, and as a result, improve the cost advantages derived from using our technology.

We may (i) integrate our U-GAS^® technology package with downstream technologies to provide a fully integrated offering where we may invest in projects either directly or through an investment partner, (ii) partner with engineering, equipment and technology companies to provide our U-GAS^® technology package into an integrated modular product offering, (iii) provide technology to enable coal resources to be integrated together with our U-GAS^® technology where the coal resources may be of little value without our U-GAS^® conversion technology, or (iv) acquire or partner with owners of these coal resources to create more value and opportunity for us through the integration of our technology with the coal resource. We understand the need to partner in certain markets, and plan to do so with companies that we believe can help us accelerate our business. Our partnering approach in some cases is country specific and in some cases is industry or segment specific. Additionally, where capital and/or financing is available, we may acquire an interest in such resources, including existing facilities or coal mines, where we could create value with our U-GAS^® technology through securing greater access to feedstock.