SYPRIS SOLUTIONS INC - Quarter Report: 2006 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006

OR

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number: 0-24020

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  Yes    x  No

As of July 28, 2006, the Registrant had 18,330,842 shares of common stock outstanding.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

1

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except for per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

2

Table of Contents

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except for share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENTS

(in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1) Nature of Business

Sypris is a diversified provider of outsourced services and specialty products. The Company performs a wide range of manufacturing, engineering, design, testing, and other technical services, typically under multi-year, sole-source contracts with corporations and government agencies in the markets for aerospace & defense electronics, truck components and assemblies, and test & measurement equipment.

(2) Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Sypris Solutions, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, “Sypris” or the “Company”), and have been prepared by the Company in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated. These unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all material adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly state the results of operations, financial position and cash flows for the periods presented, and the disclosures herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. Actual results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2006. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto, for the year ended December 31, 2005 as presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

(3) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4.” SFAS No. 151 clarifies that abnormal inventory costs such as costs of idle facilities, excess freight and handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) are required to be recognized as current period charges. The provisions of SFAS No. 151 are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company adopted SFAS No. 151 on January 1, 2006. The impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations was not material.

In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. Specifically, FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and will be adopted by the Company on January 1, 2007. The impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations has not yet been evaluated.

(4) Major Customer Chapter 11 Filing

On March 3, 2006 (the Filing Date), the Company’s largest customer, Dana Corporation (Dana), and 40 of its U.S. subsidiaries, filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. Dana’s European, South American, Asia-Pacific, Canadian and Mexican subsidiaries were excluded from the Chapter 11 filing.

On May 10, 2006, the Company reached an agreement with Dana (the Agreement) under which both parties agreed, among other things, that Dana owed the Company $21,859,236. Of this amount, the Agreement also provided the Company with a $9,200,000 payment of certain administrative expenses on May 11, 2006, as well as

5

Table of Contents

reduced payment terms on a prospective basis. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2006 (excluding certain gain contingencies), net amounts due from pre-petition Dana (Debtor in Possession) approximated $12,659,236, which was subject to additional offsets from accounts payable to Dana and other protected claims of approximately $12,311,434. The Company continues to pursue additional offsets, possible gain contingencies and other relief through the Bankruptcy Court and other dispute resolution efforts.

(5) Stock-Based Compensation

During 2004, the 1994 stock option plan expired and was replaced with the 2004 equity plan. A total of 3,000,000 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the 2004 equity plan. The Company’s stock compensation program provides for the grant of performance-based stock options (Target Options), restricted shares, and stock options. The terms and conditions of the Target Options grants provide for the determination of the exercise price and the beginning of the vesting period to occur when the fair market value of the Company’s common stock achieves certain targeted price levels. The Company has not granted Target Options since the first quarter of 2003. On August 1, 2005, the Company first issued restricted shares under the 2004 Equity Plan, including certain shares subject to performance requirements (Performance Restricted Stock). With certain exceptions, the restrictions on one-third of these shares are removed after three, five and seven years, respectively. During the restricted period, which is commensurate with each vesting year, the recipients receive dividends and voting rights for the shares. Generally, if a recipient leaves the Company before the end of the restricted period or if performance requirements, if any, are not met, the shares will be forfeited. Stock option grants under the 2004 equity plan include both six and ten year lives along with graded vesting over three, four and five years of service.

On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment”, using the modified prospective method. As a result, the Company’s 2006 results of operations reflect the portion of share-based awards earned during the six months ended June 30, 2006 for new stock options granted, previously granted and unvested stock options and Target Options. For the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006, stock-based compensation, including restricted shares and Performance Restricted Stock, approximated $260,000 and $355,000, respectively, net of taxes, and was included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated income statement. No stock-based compensation was capitalized into inventory or property, plant and equipment. In conjunction with the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company selected the straight-line amortization method for graded vesting options granted subsequent to January 1, 2006. Prior to that date, the Company used an accelerated method previously required for graded vesting awards.

Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based employee compensation arrangements in accordance with the provisions and related interpretations of Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Had compensation cost for stock-based compensation been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123R, the net income and earnings per share would have been adjusted to the following pro forma amounts (in thousands, except for per share data):

On March 1, 2005, April 25, 2005 and December 28, 2005, the Board of Directors approved resolutions to accelerate the vesting for “underwater” options as of March 11, 2005, April 25, 2005 and December 30, 2005, respectively, in order to reduce future compensation expense related to outstanding options. After amendment of each underlying option agreement, compensation expense to be recognized in the consolidated income statement, subsequent to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), was reduced by approximately $1,573,000, net of tax.

6

Table of Contents

Fair value for restricted shares is equal to the stock price on the date of grant, while fair value of Performance Restricted Stock also considers a probability-weighted performance model. The fair values of Target Options were determined by a third party valuation firm using a Monte-Carlo Simulation Model, while the fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing method. The Company uses historical Company and industry data along with implied data to estimate the expected price volatility, the expected option life, the expected forfeiture rate and the expected dividend yield. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the estimated life of the option. The following weighted average assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of options granted using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model:

During the first half of 2006, restricted stock awards potentially representing 112,000 shares of common stock were granted to Company employees. The issuance increased the total outstanding restricted stock awards to 239,500 shares at a weighted average grant date fair value per share of $11.77. No restricted shares were forfeited or vested during the first six months ended June 30, 2006. A summary of the option activity for the first six months of fiscal 2006 is as follows:

The weighted average grant date fair value based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model for options granted in the six month period ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $4.19 and $5.40 per share, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $219,000 and $469,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. A summary of the status of our unvested options as of June 30, 2006 is as follows:

As of June 30, 2006, there was $2,811,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost, after estimated forfeitures, related to unvested share-based compensation granted under our plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.4 years. The total fair value of option shares vested was $763,000 and $6,308,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

7

Table of Contents

(6) Earnings Per Common Share

There were no adjustments required to be made to net income for purposes of computing basic and diluted earnings per common share. A reconciliation of the weighted average shares outstanding used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per common share is as follows (in thousands):

(7) Inventory

Inventory consisted of the following (in thousands):

8

Table of Contents

(8) Segment Data

The Company is organized into two business groups, the Industrial Group and the Electronics Group. The Industrial Group is one reportable business segment, while the Electronics Group includes two reportable business segments, Aerospace & Defense and Test & Measurement. There was no intersegment net revenue recognized in any of the periods presented. The following table presents financial information for the reportable segments of the Company (in thousands):

(9) Commitments and Contingencies

The Company bears insurance risk as a member of a group captive insurance entity for certain general liability, automobile and workers’ compensation insurance programs and a self-insured employee health program. The Company records estimated liabilities for its insurance programs based on information provided by the third-party plan administrators, historical claims experience, expected costs of claims incurred but not paid, and expected costs to settle unpaid claims. The Company monitors its estimated insurance-related liabilities on a quarterly basis. As facts change, it may become necessary to make adjustments that could be material to the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. The Company believes that its present insurance coverage and level of accrued liabilities are adequate.

The Company is involved in certain litigation and contract issues arising in the normal course of business. While the outcome of these matters cannot, at this time, be predicted in light of the uncertainties inherent therein, management does not expect that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.

As of June 30, 2006, the Company had outstanding purchase commitments of approximately $32.7 million primarily for the acquisition of inventory and manufacturing equipment. As of June 30, 2006, the Company also had outstanding letters of credit approximating $1.9 million primarily for a captive insurance program.

9

Table of Contents

(10) Income Taxes

The Company’s effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was 45% and 17%, respectively. Reconciling items between the federal statutory income tax rate of 34% and the effective tax rate include state and foreign income taxes, estimated research and development tax credits, changes in estimate for tax contingencies, and certain other permanent differences.

(11) Employee Benefit Plans

Pension expense consisted of the following (in thousands):

(12) Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency for the Company’s Mexican subsidiary is the Mexican peso. Assets and liabilities are translated at current rates of exchange and income and expense items are translated at the weighted average exchange rate for the period. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Total comprehensive loss for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $1,493,000 and $1,355,000 respectively, including foreign currency translation adjustments of $1,049,000 and $1,768,000, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, other income, net includes foreign currency transaction gains of $532,000 and $620,000, respectively. Similar amounts for 2006 were not significant.

(13) Subsequent Events

In July of 2006, the Company paid the remaining $15,000,000 drawn on the Revolving Credit Facility.

10

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Adoption of New Accounting Principle

Our stock compensation program provides for the grant of performance-based stock options (Target Options), restricted shares, and stock options. We have not granted Target Options since the first quarter of 2003. On August 1, 2005, we first issued restricted shares under the 2004 Equity Plan, including certain shares subject to performance requirements (Performance Restricted Stock).

On January 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment”, using the modified prospective method. As a result, our 2006 results of operations reflected the portion of share-based awards earned during the six months ended June 30, 2006 for new stock options granted, previously granted stock options and Target Options. For the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006, stock-based compensation, including restricted shares and Performance Restricted Stock, approximated $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively, net of taxes and was included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated income statement. No stock-based compensation was capitalized into inventory or property, plant and equipment. In conjunction with the adoption of SFAS 123R, we selected the straight-line amortization method for graded vesting options granted subsequent to January 1, 2006. Prior to that date, we used an accelerated method previously required for graded vesting awards.

Prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted for stock-based employee compensation arrangements in accordance with the provisions and related interpretations of Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Had compensation cost for stock-based compensation been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123R, the net income and earnings per share would have been adjusted to the following pro forma amounts (in thousands, except for per share data):

On March 1, 2005, April 25, 2005 and December 28, 2005, the Board of Directors approved resolutions to accelerate the vesting for “underwater” options as of March 11, 2005, April 25, 2005 and December 30, 2005, respectively, in order to reduce future compensation expense related to outstanding options. After amendment of each underlying option agreement, compensation expense to be recognized in the consolidated income statement, subsequent to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), was reduced by approximately $1.6 million, net of tax.

Results of Operations

The tables presented below, which compare our results of operations for the second quarter and six month periods from 2006 to 2005, present the results for each period, the change in those results from 2006 to 2005 in both dollars and percentage change and the results for each period as a percentage of net revenue. The columns present the following:

11

Table of Contents

In addition, as used in these tables, “NM” means “not meaningful.”

Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2005

12

Table of Contents

Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2005