SYPRIS SOLUTIONS INC - Quarter Report: 2009 April (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x Quarterly Report
Pursuant To Section 13 Or 15(d) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of
1934
For the
quarterly period ended April 5, 2009
OR
¨ Transition Report
Pursuant To Section 13 Or 15(d) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of
1934
For the
transition period from _____ to _____
Commission
file number: 0-24020
SYPRIS
SOLUTIONS, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
61-1321992
|
(State
or other jurisdiction
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
of
incorporation or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
101
Bullitt Lane, Suite 450
|
|
Louisville,
Kentucky 40222
|
(502)
329-2000
|
(Address
of principal executive
|
(Registrant’s
telephone number,
|
offices)
(Zip code)
|
including
area code)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such reports). o Yes o No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
o Large
accelerated filer
|
o Accelerated
filer
|
o Non-accelerated
filer
|
x Smaller
reporting company
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes x No
As of
April 30, 2009, the Registrant had 19,645,107 shares of common stock
outstanding.
Table
of Contents
Part
I.
|
Financial Information | |||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended April 5, 2009 and
March 30, 2008
|
2
|
|||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets at April 5, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
3
|
|||
Consolidated
Cash Flow Statements for the Three Months Ended April 5, 2009 and March
30, 2008
|
4
|
|||
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
5
|
|||
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
15
|
||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
20
|
||
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
20
|
||
Part
II.
|
Other
Information
|
|||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
20
|
||
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
20
|
||
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
21
|
||
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
21
|
||
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
21
|
||
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
21
|
||
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
22
|
||
Signatures
|
23
|
1
Part
I. Financial Information
Item
1. Financial Statements
Sypris
Solutions, Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
(in
thousands, except for per share data)
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||
April
5,
|
March
30,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Net
revenue:
|
||||||||
Outsourced
services
|
$ | 63,479 | $ | 88,672 | ||||
Products
|
18,212 | 17,590 | ||||||
Total
net revenue
|
81,691 | 106,262 | ||||||
Cost
of sales:
|
||||||||
Outsourced
services
|
63,870 | 79,975 | ||||||
Products
|
13,466 | 13,221 | ||||||
Total
cost of sales
|
77,336 | 93,196 | ||||||
Gross
profit
|
4,355 | 13,066 | ||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
10,472 | 10,492 | ||||||
Research
and development
|
1,168 | 995 | ||||||
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
28 | 71 | ||||||
Nonrecurring
expense
|
1,981 | — | ||||||
Operating
(loss) income
|
(9,294 | ) | 1,508 | |||||
Interest
expense, net
|
1,269 | 952 | ||||||
Other
expense, net
|
307 | 8 | ||||||
(Loss)
income before income taxes
|
(10,870 | ) | 548 | |||||
Income
tax expense
|
475 | 163 | ||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$ | (11,345 | ) | $ | 385 | |||
(Loss)
earnings per common share:
|
||||||||
Basic
|
$ | (0.62 | ) | $ | 0.02 | |||
Diluted
|
$ | (0.62 | ) | $ | 0.02 | |||
Dividends
declared per common share
|
$ | — | $ | 0.03 | ||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
||||||||
Basic
|
18,434 | 18,342 | ||||||
Diluted
|
18,434 | 18,372 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
2
Sypris
Solutions, Inc.
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(in
thousands, except for share data)
April
5,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Note)
|
|||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 5,080 | $ | 13,717 | ||||
Restricted
cash
|
450 | 464 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
46,053 | 44,695 | ||||||
Inventory,
net
|
41,701 | 48,394 | ||||||
Other
current assets
|
12,158 | 12,009 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
105,442 | 119,279 | ||||||
Investment
in marketable securities
|
2,470 | 2,769 | ||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
101,498 | 105,219 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
13,837 | 13,837 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
11,521 | 12,101 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 234,768 | $ | 253,205 | ||||
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Equity
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 39,419 | $ | 44,645 | ||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
25,909 | 28,433 | ||||||
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
75,000 | — | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
140,328 | 73,078 | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
— | 73,000 | ||||||
Other
liabilities
|
46,469 | 47,142 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
186,797 | 193,220 | ||||||
Stockholders’
equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, par value $0.01 per share, 975,150 shares authorized; no shares
issued
|
— | — | ||||||
Series
A preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, 24,850 shares authorized; no
shares issued
|
— | — | ||||||
Common
stock, non-voting, par value $0.01 per share, 10,000,000 shares
authorized; no shares issued
|
— | — | ||||||
Common
stock, par value $0.01 per share, 30,000,000 shares authorized; 20,019,347
shares issued and 19,613,907 outstanding in 2009 and 19,496,620 shares
issued and 19,296,003 outstanding in 2008
|
200 | 195 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
146,803 | 146,741 | ||||||
Retained
deficit
|
(78,483 | ) | (67,205 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(20,545 | ) | (19,744 | ) | ||||
Treasury
stock, 405,440 and 200,617 shares in 2009 and 2008,
respectively
|
(4 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
47,971 | 59,985 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 234,768 | $ | 253,205 |
Note: The
balance sheet at December 31, 2008 has been derived from
the audited consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include
all information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States for a complete set of financial
statements.
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
3
Sypris
Solutions, Inc.
Consolidated
Cash Flow Statements
(in
thousands)
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||
April
5,
|
March
30,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$ | (11,345 | ) | $ | 385 | |||
Adjustments
to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
4,901 | 6,971 | ||||||
Noncash
compensation expense
|
83 | 432 | ||||||
Other
noncash items
|
349 | (5,340 | ) | |||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(1,414 | ) | (7,382 | ) | ||||
Inventory
|
5,992 | (1,941 | ) | |||||
Other
current assets
|
(188 | ) | 5,159 | |||||
Accounts
payable
|
(5,506 | ) | 15,690 | |||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
(766 | ) | 4,613 | |||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
(7,894 | ) | 18,587 | |||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Capital
expenditures, net
|
(1,873 | ) | (3,219 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale of assets
|
26 | — | ||||||
Changes
in nonoperating assets and liabilities
|
142 | (471 | ) | |||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(1,705 | ) | (3,690 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Net
change in debt under revolving credit agreements
|
2,000 | (10,000 | ) | |||||
Debt
modification costs
|
(652 | ) | — | |||||
Cash
dividends paid
|
(386 | ) | (572 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
962 | (10,572 | ) | |||||
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(8,637 | ) | 4,325 | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
13,717 | 14,622 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 5,080 | $ | 18,947 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
4
Sypris
Solutions, Inc.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
(1)
|
Nature
of Business
|
Sypris is
a diversified provider of outsourced services and specialty products. The
Company performs a wide range of manufacturing, engineering, design, testing,
and other technical services, typically under multi-year, sole-source contracts
with corporations and government agencies in the markets for truck components
& assemblies, aerospace & defense electronics, and test &
measurement equipment.
(2)
|
Basis
of Presentation
|
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Sypris Solutions, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, Sypris
or the Company), and have been prepared by the Company in accordance with the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. All significant
intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated. These unaudited
consolidated financial statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all
material adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary
to fairly state the results of operations, financial position and cash flows for
the periods presented, and the disclosures herein are adequate to make the
information presented not misleading. Preparing financial statements requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. Actual results for the three months
ended April 5, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that
may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009. These unaudited
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto, for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K.
Certain
prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
(3)
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
|
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS
No. 157). The objective of SFAS No. 157 is to increase
consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and to expand
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies under other
accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and
does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157
was effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. However, in
February 2008, the FASB released FASB Staff Position (FSP)
SFAS No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement
No. 157, which delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for
all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring
basis (at least annually). The adoption of SFAS No. 157 for
financial assets and liabilities did not have a material impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements. The adoption of SFAS No. 157
for non-financial assets and liabilities, effective January 1, 2009,
did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment to ARB No. 51 (SFAS
No. 160). SFAS No. 160 requires all entities to report
noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries as equity in the consolidated financial
statements, but separate from the equity of the parent company. The
statement further requires that consolidated net income be reported at amounts
attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest, rather than
expensing the income attributable to the minority interest
holder. This statement also requires that companies provide
sufficient disclosures to clearly identify and distinguish between the interests
of the parent company and the interests of the noncontrolling owners, including
a disclosure on the face of the consolidated statements for income attributable
to the noncontrolling interest holder. This statement is effective
for fiscal years beginning on or after
December 15, 2008. The adoption of this statement did not
have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
5
In
March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No.
133 (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 applies to all
derivative instruments and nonderivative instruments that are designated and
qualify as hedging instruments pursuant to paragraphs 37 and 42 of Statement
133, and related hedged items accounted for under FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 133). SFAS No.
161 requires entities to provide greater transparency through additional
disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No.
133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and
related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, results of
operations, and cash flows. This statement is effective for fiscal
years beginning on or after November 15, 2008. The adoption
of this statement did not have a significant impact on the Company’s disclosures
included in its consolidated financial statements.
In
April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position SFAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets (FSP 142-3). FSP 142-3 amends the factors
that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to
determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (SFAS No. 142). FSP 142-3 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this
statement did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated
financial position and results of operations.
In
May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (SFAS No. 162). SFAS No. 162 identifies
the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the
principles used in the preparation of financial statements that are presented in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United
States. This statement is not expected to change existing practices
but rather reduce the complexity of financial reporting. This
statement will go into effect 60 days after the SEC approves related auditing
rules.
In
June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments
Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities
(FSP EITF 03-6-1). This FSP addresses whether instruments
granted in share-based payment transactions may be participating securities
prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation
in computing basic earnings per share (EPS) pursuant to the two-class method
described in paragraphs 60 and 61 of SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per
Share. A share-based payment award that contains a
non-forfeitable right to receive cash when dividends are paid to common
shareholders irrespective of whether that award ultimately vests or remains
unvested shall be considered a participating security as these rights to
dividends provide a non-contingent transfer of value to the holder of the
share-based payment award. Accordingly, these awards should be
included in the computation of basic EPS pursuant to the two-class
method. The guidance in this FSP is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those
years. Under the terms of the Company’s restricted stock awards,
grantees are entitled to receive dividends on the unvested portions of their
awards. There is no requirement to return these dividends in the
event the unvested awards are forfeited in the future. Accordingly,
the Company evaluated the impact of FSP EITF 03-6-1 and determined that the
impact was not material and determined the basic and diluted earnings per share
amounts, as reported, are equivalent to the basic and diluted earnings per share
amounts calculated under FSP EITF 03-6-1.
In
April 2009, the FASB staff issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value
of Financial Instruments (FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1). This FSP amends
FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments, to require disclosures about fair value of
financial instruments in interim financial statements as well as in annual
financial statements. This FSP also amends Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 28, Interim Financial
Reporting, to require these disclosures in all interim financial
statements. This staff position is effective for interim reporting periods
ending after June 15, 2009 and is not expected to have a material impact on
disclosures in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In
April 2009, the FASB staff issued FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the
Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly
Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP FAS
157-4). This FSP provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in
accordance with FAS 157 when the volume and
level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. This
FSP also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a
transaction is not orderly (i.e., a forced liquidation or distressed
sale). This staff position is effective for interim reporting periods
ending after June 15, 2009 and is not expected
to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
6
(4)
|
Dana
Claim
|
On
March 3, 2006, the Company’s largest customer, Dana, and 40 of its
U.S. subsidiaries, filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York. On August 7, 2007, the Company
entered into a comprehensive settlement agreement with Dana to resolve all
outstanding disputes between the parties, terminate previously approved
arbitration payments and enter into a new long-term supply contract running
through 2014. In addition, Dana provided the Company with an allowed
general unsecured non-priority claim in the amount of $89,900,000, which was
recorded by the Company at its estimated fair value of $76,483,000 as of the
August 7, 2007 settlement date. The claim entitled the
Company to receive an initial distribution of 3,090,408 shares of common stock
in Dana, the right to participate in additional distributions of reserved shares
of common stock of Dana if certain disputed matters are ultimately resolved for
less than Dana’s reserves for those matters (estimated by the Company to
represent an additional 739,000 shares) and the right to receive a distribution
of cash of $6,891,000.
Dana
emerged from bankruptcy on January 31, 2008, and on
February 1, 2008, the newly issued shares of Dana Holding Corporation
began trading on the New York Stock Exchange. On
February 11, 2008, the Company received its initial distribution of
common stock (3,090,408 shares), and on March 18, 2008 the Company received its
cash distribution totaling $6,891,000. On April 21, 2008,
July 30, 2008 and October 10, 2008, the Company received
114,536, 152,506 and 384,931 of Dana common shares, respectively. To
date, the Company has received approximately 98% of the total common shares it
expects to receive.
The
aforementioned cash distribution was recorded as a reduction in the Company’s
$76,483,000 recorded basis in the claim. Of the remaining
$69,592,000, $56,162,000 was attributed to the initial distribution of shares
received by the Company in February 2008, $2,081,000 was attributed to the
shares received in April 2008, $2,771,000 was attributed to the shares
received in July 2008 and $6,995,000 was attributed to the shares received
in October 2008 (approximately $18.17 per share). The remaining
$1,583,000 was attributed to the 87,000 in additional shares expected to be
received by the Company. If the Company ultimately receives fewer
additional shares than expected, the recorded costs of shares held would be
adjusted on a pro rata basis.
The
Company accounts for its common stock in Dana as available-for-sale securities
in accordance with SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments
in Debt and Equity Securities (SFAS No. 115). Based on an
analysis of other-than-temporary impairment factors, the Company recorded an
other-than-temporary impairment of $66,758,000 during the fourth quarter of
2008. The non-cash impairment was based on Dana’s closing stock price
of $0.74 per share on December 31, 2008. The Company has not sold any
of its common stock in Dana, and at April 5, 2009, the
basis and fair value of the Company’s holdings of Dana common stock amounted to
$2,769,000 and $2,470,000, respectively. In accordance with SFAS No.
115, the $299,000 decline in value was considered temporary and was recorded as
an unrealized holding loss in other comprehensive loss for the first quarter of
2009.
At
April 5, 2009, the
Company’s right to participate in additional distributions of Dana common stock,
presently estimated to be 87,000 additional shares, is carried at $64,000 in
other assets. Had these shares been received at April 5, 2009, the
Company would have recorded an additional $7,000 unrealized holding loss to
other comprehensive loss.
(5)
|
Restructuring,
Impairments and Other Nonrecurring
Charges
|
As
announced during the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company committed to a
restructuring program, which included the closure of its Kenton and Marion, Ohio
facilities and the integration of its Aerospace & Defense
subsidiaries. The purpose of the restructuring program was to reduce
fixed costs, accelerate integration efficiencies, exit certain unprofitable
product lines and significantly improve operating earnings on a sustained
basis. The Company expects to complete its program by early
2010. As a result of these initiatives, in 2008, the Company recorded
a restructuring charge of $45,086,000, or $2.45 per share. In the
first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded $1,981,000, or $0.11 per share, of
costs related to these initiatives in nonrecurring expense. Of this
amount, $1,242,000 was recorded within the Industrial Group and $739,000 was
recorded within the Aerospace & Defense
segment. Of these costs, $711,000 was for severance and
benefit-related costs, $712,000 related to equipment relocation costs, $121,000
represented non-cash impairment costs and $437,000 represented other costs,
primarily related to IT and process reengineering consultants. The
Company expects to incur additional pre-tax costs of $3,307,000 as outlined in
the table below. Of the aggregate $50,374,000 of pre-tax costs for
the total program, the Company expects $13,800,000 will be cash expenditures,
the majority of which will be spent in 2009. A summary of the pre-tax
charges is as follows (in thousands):
7
Recognized
|
Remaining
|
|||||||||||
Total
|
as
of
|
Costs
to be
|
||||||||||
Program
|
April 5, 2009
|
Recognized
|
||||||||||
Severance
and benefit-related costs
|
$ | 4,031 | $ | 3,433 | $ | 598 | ||||||
Asset
impairments
|
12,302 | 12,302 | — | |||||||||
Deferred
contract costs write-offs
|
16,102 | 16,102 | — | |||||||||
Inventory
related charges
|
7,895 | 7,895 | — | |||||||||
Equipment
relocation costs
|
1,856 | 951 | 905 | |||||||||
Asset
retirement obligations
|
1,500 | 1,500 | — | |||||||||
Contract
termination costs
|
3,209 | 3,209 | — | |||||||||
Other
|
3,479 | 1,675 | 1,804 | |||||||||
$ | 50,374 | $ | 47,067 | $ | 3,307 |
Severance
and benefit-related costs tied to workforce reductions were recorded in
accordance with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated
with Exit or Disposal Activities (SFAS No. 146) and
SFAS No. 112, Employers’ Accounting for
Postemployment Benefits (SFAS No. 112). Under SFAS No. 146,
one-time termination benefits that are conditioned on employment through a
certain transition period are recognized ratably between the date employees are
communicated the details of the one-time termination benefit and their final
date of service. Accordingly, the Company recorded $2,723,000 in
2008, $711,000 in the first quarter of 2009 and expects to record an additional
$598,000 during the remainder of 2009.
The
Company evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment when events or
circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable in
accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No. 144). The Company’s
strategic decision to close certain facilities and transfer production among
other facilities led to a $12,181,000 non-cash impairment charge in 2008 and a
$121,000 non-cash charge in the first quarter of 2009. The charges
were based on the excess of carrying value of certain assets not expected to be
redeployed over their respective fair value. Fair values for these
assets were determined based on third-party appraisals and discounted cash flow
analyses. For assets to be redeployed to other Company locations, the
Company incurred $239,000 in relocation costs in 2008, $712,000 in the first
quarter of 2009 and expects to incur $905,000 in additional costs during the
remainder of 2009 and early 2010.
Forecasted
volumes for one of the Company’s link encryption products was significantly
reduced during the fourth quarter of 2008 due to revised demand estimates from
the National Security Agency. The Company had incurred and deferred
over $20,000,000 in pre-contract costs since 2005. Based on this
revision in demand, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $16,102,000 in
2008 to write off a portion of these deferred contract costs in accordance with
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position No.
81-1, Accounting for
Performance of Construction-Type Contracts (SOP
81-1). Additionally, as a result of integration efforts within the
Aerospace & Defense segment and the exit from certain other non-core product
lines, the Company recorded non-cash inventory charges totaling $7,895,000 for
inventory determined to be excess or obsolete as of
December 31, 2008.
Asset
retirement obligations recorded during 2008 relate to the expected closure of
two Industrial Group facilities. Although the Company is indemnified
for major environmental conditions that existed prior to the acquisition of
these facilities, certain other matters, including emptying residual chemicals
from remaining storage tanks, purging operating pipelines within the facilities,
and filling pits following the relocation of strategic operating equipment to
other facilities, remain the responsibility of the Company. Such
costs are estimated to be $1,500,000, of which $7,000 was expended during the
first quarter of 2009.
8
In
connection with the Company’s restructuring, rights conveyed under certain
leases ceased being used during the fourth quarter of 2008. Aggregate
discounted lease payments and a $915,000 lease termination payment to be made in
2009 were accrued in 2008 in accordance with SFAS No. 146. Total
lease contract termination costs amounted to $3,209,000 for 2008.
A summary
of restructuring activity and related reserves at April 5, 2009 is as follows
(in thousands):
Accrued
|
Accrued
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance
at
|
|
Gross
|
Balance
at
|
|||||||||||||
December
31,
|
2009
|
Cash
|
April
5,
|
|||||||||||||
2008
|
Charge
|
Payments
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Severance
and benefit related costs
|
$ | 2,045 | $ | 711 | $ | (1,184 | ) | $ | 1,572 | |||||||
Asset
retirement obligations
|
1,500 | — | (7 | ) | 1,493 | |||||||||||
Contract
termination costs
|
3,141 | — | (662 | ) | 2,479 | |||||||||||
Other
|
— | 437 | (299 | ) | 138 | |||||||||||
$ | 6,686 | $ | 1,148 | $ | (2,152 | ) | $ | 5,682 |
A summary
of total charges by reportable segment is as follows (in
thousands):
Industrial
Group
|
Aerospace
&
Defense
|
Total
|
||||||||||
Severance
and benefit-related costs
|
$ | 2,487 | $ | 946 | $ | 3,433 | ||||||
Asset
impairments
|
12,302 | — | 12,302 | |||||||||
Deferred
contract costs write-offs
|
— | 16,102 | 16,102 | |||||||||
Inventory
related charges
|
— | 7,895 | 7,895 | |||||||||
Equipment
relocation costs
|
951 | — | 951 | |||||||||
Asset
retirement obligations
|
1,500 | — | 1,500 | |||||||||
Contract
termination costs
|
1,868 | 1,341 | 3,209 | |||||||||
Other
|
62 | 1,613 | 1,675 | |||||||||
$ | 19,170 | $ | 27,897 | $ | 47,067 |
The
Company expects to incur additional pre-tax costs of approximately $2,655,000 in
the Industrial Group and $652,000 in the Aerospace & Defense
segment. The total pre-tax costs of $50,374,000 expected to be
incurred includes $21,825,000 within the Industrial Group and $28,549,000 within
the Aerospace & Defense segment.
(6)
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
On
February 25, 2009, the Company granted 296,000 restricted stock awards under a
long-term incentive program. Fifty percent of the awards vest on each
of the first and second anniversaries of the grant
date. Additionally, the Company granted 405,000 restricted stock
awards under a special incentive key employee award program. These
shares vest on the third anniversary of the grant date. The Company
also granted 300,000 options on February 25, 2009 with a five year life and
cliff vesting at three years of service. The grants did not have a
significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements during the
current period.
Effective
as of March 2, 2009, the Company’s Compensation Committee exercised its
discretion under a long-term incentive program to cancel 336,201 shares of
previously awarded, Performance Restricted Stock. As the performance
requirements for these awards had not been probable, no additional expense was
recognized during the period.
9
(7)
|
(Loss) Earnings Per Common
Share
|
On
January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FSP EITF 03-6-1. This
FSP addresses determinations as to whether instruments granted in
share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting
and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing
earnings per share (EPS) under the two-class method described in paragraphs 60
and 61 of SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per
Share. Restricted stock awards granted to employees contain
nonforfeitable dividend rights and, therefore, are now considered participating
securities in accordance with FSP EITF 03-6-1. Accordingly, the
Company evaluated the impact of FSP EITF 03-6-1 and determined that the
impact was not material and determined the basic and diluted earnings per share
amounts, as reported, are equivalent to the basic and diluted earnings per share
amounts calculated under FSP EITF 03-6-1.
A
reconciliation of the weighted average shares outstanding used in the
calculation of basic and diluted (loss) earnings per common share is as follows
(in thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||
April
5,
|
March
30,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Shares
used to compute basic (loss) earnings per common share
|
18,434 | 18,342 | ||||||
Dilutive
effect of stock options and restricted stock
|
— | 30 | ||||||
Shares
used to compute diluted (loss) earnings per common share
|
18,434 | 18,372 |
(8)
|
Investment in Marketable
Securities
|
The
Company’s investment in marketable securities consists exclusively of shares in
Dana common stock. The Company’s investment in Dana common stock is
classified as an available-for-sale security in accordance with SFAS No. 115 and
measured at fair value as determined by a quoted market price (a level 1
valuation under SFAS No. 157). The related unrealized holding losses
are excluded from operations and recorded in accumulated other comprehensive
loss on the consolidated balance sheets. At April 5, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, the Company owned 3,742,381 common shares of Dana
with a market value of $0.66 per share and $0.74 per share,
respectively. At April 5, 2009, the gross unrealized loss was
approximately $299,000. This decline is considered
temporary. There were no unrealized gains or losses at December 31,
2008. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be
other-than-temporary will be included in other expense, if and when
recorded. In accordance with SFAS No. 157, the fair value of the
shares was valued based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical
shares at April 5, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
The
following table summarizes marketable securities as of April 5, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
Fair
Value
|
||||||||||||||||
At
Quoted
|
||||||||||||||||
Prices
|
||||||||||||||||
Gross
|
Gross
|
in
Active
|
||||||||||||||
Unrealized
|
Recorded
|
Markets
|
||||||||||||||
Basis
|
Gain/(Loss)
|
Gain/(Loss)
|
(Level 1)
|
|||||||||||||
Marketable
securities, April 5, 2009
|
$ | 2,769 | $ | (299 | ) | $ | — | $ | 2,470 | |||||||
Marketable
securities, December 31, 2008
|
$ | 2,769 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,769 |
10
(9)
|
Inventory
|
Inventory
consisted of the following (in thousands):
April
5,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Raw
materials, including perishable tooling of $403 and $737 in 2009 and 2008,
respectively
|
$ | 14,567 | $ | 16,423 | ||||
Work
in process
|
8,290 | 9,804 | ||||||
Finished
goods
|
5,836 | 8,337 | ||||||
Costs
relating to long-term contracts and programs, net of amounts attributed to
revenue recognized to date
|
22,390 | 24,230 | ||||||
Progress
payments related to long-term contracts and programs
|
— | (781 | ) | |||||
Reserve
for excess and obsolete inventory
|
(9,382 | ) | (9,619 | ) | ||||
$ | 41,701 | $ | 48,394 |
(10)
|
Debt
|
Debt
consists of the following:
April
5,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Revolving
credit facility
|
$ | 45,000 | $ | 43,000 | ||||
Senior
notes
|
30,000 | 30,000 | ||||||
75,000 | 73,000 | |||||||
Less
current portion
|
(75,000 | ) | — | |||||
$ | — | $ | 73,000 |
In March
2009, our Revolving Credit Agreement and Senior Notes were amended to, among
other things, i) waive the
defaults as of December 31, 2008, ii) limit total borrowings, iii) revise the
maturity date for the Credit Agreement and Senior Notes to January 15, 2010, iv)
revise certain financial covenants, v) restrict the payment of dividends, vi)
require mandatory prepayment to the extent that marketable securities or other
collateral is sold, and vii) increase our interest rate
structure. Maximum borrowings on the Revolving Credit Agreement are
$50.0 million, and standby letters of credit up to a maximum of $15.0
million may be issued under the Revolving Credit Agreement of which
$1,963,000 were issued
at April 5, 2009.
As a
result of the aforementioned modifications, the Company deferred $652,000 of
loan costs, which are included in other assets in the consolidated balance
sheets.
11
(11)
|
Segment
Data
|
The
Company is organized into two business groups, the Industrial Group and the
Electronics Group. The Industrial Group is one reportable business segment,
while the Electronics Group includes two reportable business segments, Aerospace
& Defense and Test & Measurement. There was no intersegment net revenue
recognized in any of the periods presented. The following table presents
financial information for the reportable segments of the Company (in
thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||
April 5,
|
March 30,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Net
revenue from unaffiliated customers:
|
||||||||
Industrial
Group
|
$ | 37,498 | $ | 69,815 | ||||
Aerospace
& Defense
|
30,211 | 23,424 | ||||||
Test
& Measurement
|
13,982 | 13,023 | ||||||
Electronics
Group
|
44,193 | 36,447 | ||||||
$ | 81,691 | $ | 106,262 | |||||
Gross
profit (loss):
|
||||||||
Industrial
Group
|
$ | (2,702 | ) | $ | 6,829 | |||
Aerospace
& Defense
|
3,256 | 2,899 | ||||||
Test
& Measurement
|
3,801 | 3,338 | ||||||
Electronics
Group
|
7,057 | 6,237 | ||||||
$ | 4,355 | $ | 13,066 | |||||
Operating
(loss) income:
|
||||||||
Industrial
Group
|
$ | (6,684 | ) | $ | 4,154 | |||
Aerospace
& Defense
|
(1,225 | ) | (752 | ) | ||||
Test
& Measurement
|
866 | 510 | ||||||
Electronics
Group
|
(359 | ) | (242 | ) | ||||
General,
corporate and other
|
(2,251 | ) | (2,404 | ) | ||||
$ | (9,294 | ) | $ | 1,508 |
April 5,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Total
assets:
|
||||||||
Industrial
Group
|
$ | 134,362 | $ | 146,964 | ||||
Aerospace
& Defense
|
64,931 | 65,077 | ||||||
Test
& Measurement
|
29,716 | 29,892 | ||||||
Electronics
Group
|
94,647 | 94,969 | ||||||
General,
corporate and other
|
5,759 | 11,272 | ||||||
$ | 234,768 | $ | 253,205 |
(12)
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
The
provision for estimated warranty costs is recorded at the time of sale and
periodically adjusted to reflect actual experience. The Company’s warranty
liability, which is included in accrued liabilities in the accompanying balance
sheets, as of April 5, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $500,000 and $466,000,
respectively. The Company’s warranty expense for the quarters ended
April 5, 2009 and March 30, 2008 was $138,000 and $3,000,
respectively.
12
Additionally,
the Company sells three and five-year extended warranties for one of its link
encryption products. The revenue from the extended warranties is
deferred and recognized ratably over the contractual term. As of
April 5, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had deferred $791,000 and
$476,000, respectively, related to extended warranties, which is included in
other liabilities in the accompanying balance sheets.
The
Company bears insurance risk as a member of a group captive insurance entity for
certain general liability, automobile and workers’ compensation insurance
programs and a self-insured employee health program. The Company
records estimated liabilities for its insurance programs based on information
provided by the third-party plan administrators, historical claims experience,
expected costs of claims incurred but not paid, and expected costs to settle
unpaid claims. The Company monitors its estimated insurance-related
liabilities on a quarterly basis. As facts change, it may become
necessary to make adjustments that could be material to the Company’s
consolidated results of operations and financial condition. The
Company believes that its present insurance coverage and level of accrued
liabilities are adequate.
The
Company is involved in certain litigation and contract issues arising in the
normal course of business. While the outcome of these matters cannot,
at this time, be predicted in light of the uncertainties inherent therein,
management does not expect that these matters will have a material adverse
effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the
Company.
As of
April 5, 2009, the Company had outstanding purchase commitments of approximately
$28,636,000, primarily for the acquisition of inventory and manufacturing
equipment. As of April 5, 2009, the Company also had outstanding
letters of credit approximating $1,963,000 primarily under the aforementioned
captive insurance program.
(13)
|
Income
Taxes
|
The
provision for income taxes includes federal, state, local and foreign
taxes. The Company’s effective tax rate varies from period to period
due to the proportion of foreign and domestic pre-tax income expected to be
generated by the Company. The Company provides for income taxes for
its domestic operations at a statutory rate of 35% and for its foreign
operations at a statutory rate of 28%. The Company’s foreign
operations are also subject to minimum income taxes in periods where positive
cash flows exceed taxable income. In the first quarter of 2009,
minimum income taxes were required for the Company’s foreign
operations. Reconciling items between the federal statutory rate and
the effective tax rate also include state income taxes, valuation allowances and
certain other permanent differences.
The
Company recognizes liabilities or assets for the deferred tax consequences of
temporary differences between the tax bases of assets or liabilities and their
reported amounts in the financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income
Taxes (SFAS No. 109). These temporary differences will result
in taxable or deductible amounts in future years when the reported amounts of
assets or liabilities are recovered or settled. SFAS No. 109 requires
that a valuation allowance be established when it is more likely than not that
all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The
Company evaluates its deferred tax position on a quarterly basis and valuation
allowances are provided as necessary. During this evaluation, the
Company reviews its forecast of income in conjunction with other positive and
negative evidence surrounding the realizability of its deferred tax assets to
determine if a valuation allowance is needed. Based on the Company’s
current forecast, a valuation allowance of $4,206,000 was recorded through
earnings for the three months ended April 5, 2009; however, there can be no
assurances that the Company’s forecasts are now, or in the future will be,
accurate or that other factors impacting this deferred tax asset will not
materially and adversely affect its business, results of operations and
financial condition. There was no valuation allowance recorded for
the three months ended March 30, 2008.
13
(14)
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
Pension
expense (benefit) consisted of the following (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||
April 5,
|
March 30,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Service
cost
|
$ | 18 | $ | 25 | ||||
Interest
cost on projected benefit obligation
|
595 | 580 | ||||||
Net
amortizations, deferrals and other costs
|
252 | 27 | ||||||
Expected
return on plan assets
|
(587 | ) | (813 | ) | ||||
$ | 278 | $ | (181 | ) |
(15)
|
Other
Comprehensive Loss
|
The
Company’s accumulated other comprehensive loss consists of the accumulated net
unrealized losses on available-for-sale investments, employee benefit related
adjustments and foreign currency translation adjustments.
The
components of comprehensive loss, net of tax, are as follows for the periods
indicated (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||
April 5,
|
March 30,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$ | (11,345 | ) | $ | 385 | |||
Other
comprehensive loss:
|
||||||||
Unrealized
loss on available-for-sale securities
|
(299 | ) | (21,231 | ) | ||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
(502 | ) | 534 | |||||
Total
comprehensive loss
|
$ | (12,146 | ) | $ | (20,312 | ) |
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss consisted of the following (in thousands):
April 5,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
$ | (6,439 | ) | $ | (5,937 | ) | ||
Unrealized
loss on available-for-sale securities
|
(299 | ) | — | |||||
Employee
benefit related adjustments
|
(13,807 | ) | (13,807 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
$ | (20,545 | ) | $ | (19,744 | ) |
14
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
Results
of Operations
The table
presented below, which compares our first quarterly period of operations from
2009 to 2008, presents the results for each period, the change in those results
from 2009 to 2008 in both dollars and percentage change and the results for each
period as a percentage of net revenue. The columns present the
following:
|
·
|
The
first two data columns in the table show the absolute results for each
period presented.
|
|
·
|
The
columns entitled “Year Over Year Change” and “Year Over Year Percentage
Change” show the change in results, both in dollars and percentages. These
two columns show favorable changes as positive and unfavorable changes as
negative. For example, when our net revenue increases from one period to
the next, that change is shown as a positive number in both columns.
Conversely, when expenses increase from one period to the next, that
change is shown as a negative number in both
columns.
|
|
·
|
The
last two columns in the table show the results for each period as a
percentage of net revenue. In these two columns, the cost of sales and
gross profit for each are given as a percentage of that segment’s net
revenue. These amounts are shown in
italics.
|
In
addition, as used in the table, “NM” means “not meaningful.”
15
Three
Months Ended April 5, 2009 Compared to Three Months Ended March 30,
2008
Year Over
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Over
|
Year
|
Results as Percentage of
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Year
|
Percentage
|
Net Revenue for the Three
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended,
|
Change
|
Change
|
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
April 5,
|
March 30,
|
Favorable
|
Favorable
|
April 5,
|
March 30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
(Unfavorable)
|
(Unfavorable)
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentage data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
revenue:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial
Group
|
$ | 37,498 | $ | 69,815 | $ | (32,317 | ) | (46.3 | )% | 45.9 | % | 65.7 | % | |||||||||||
Aerospace
& Defense
|
30,211 | 23,424 | 6,787 | 29.0 | 37.0 | 22.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Test
& Measurement
|
13,982 | 13,023 | 959 | 7.4 | 17.1 | 12.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Electronics
Group
|
44,193 | 36,447 | 7,746 | 21.3 | 54.1 | 34.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
81,691 | 106,262 | (24,571 | ) | (23.1 | ) | 100.0 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Cost
of sales:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial
Group
|
40,200 | 62,986 | 22,786 | 36.2 | 107.2 | 90.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Aerospace
& Defense
|
26,955 | 20,525 | (6,430 | ) | (31.3 | ) | 89.2 | 87.6 | ||||||||||||||||
Test
& Measurement
|
10,181 | 9,685 | (496 | ) | (5.1 | ) | 72.8 | 74.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Electronics
Group
|
37,136 | 30,210 | (6,926 | ) | (22.9 | ) | 84.0 | 82.9 | ||||||||||||||||
Total
|
77,336 | 93,196 | 15,860 | 17.0 | 94.7 | 87.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross
profit (loss):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial
Group
|
(2,702 | ) | 6,829 | (9,531 | ) | (139.6 | ) | (7.2 | ) | 9.8 | ||||||||||||||
Aerospace
& Defense
|
3,256 | 2,899 | 357 | 12.3 | 10.8 | 12.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Test
& Measurement
|
3,801 | 3,338 | 463 | 13.9 | 27.2 | 25.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Electronics
Group
|
7,057 | 6,237 | 820 | 13.1 | 16.0 | 17.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
4,355 | 13,066 | (8,711 | ) | (66.7 | ) | 5.3 | 12.3 | ||||||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
10,472 | 10,492 | 20 | 0.2 | 12.8 | 9.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Research
and development
|
1,168 | 995 | (173 | ) | (17.4 | ) | 1.4 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
28 | 71 | 43 | 60.6 | - | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Nonrecurring
expense
|
1,981 | — | (1,981 | ) |
NM
|
2.4 | - | |||||||||||||||||
Operating
(loss) income
|
(9,294 | ) | 1,508 | (10,802 | ) |
NM
|
(11.3 | ) | 1.4 | |||||||||||||||
Interest
expense, net
|
1,269 | 952 | (317 | ) | (33.3 | ) | 1.6 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||||
Other
expense, net
|
307 | 8 | (299 | ) |
NM
|
0.4 | - | |||||||||||||||||
(Loss)
income before income taxes
|
(10,870 | ) | 548 | (11,418 | ) |
NM
|
(13.3 | ) | 0.5 | |||||||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
475 | 163 | (312 | ) | (191.4 | ) | 0.6 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$ | (11,345 | ) | $ | 385 | $ | (11,730 | ) |
NM
|
(13.9 | )% | 0.4 | % |
16
Backlog. At April 5, 2009,
backlog for our Aerospace & Defense segment decreased $12.4 million to
$95.1 million from
$107.5 million at
March 30, 2008, on a
36% decrease in net orders to $20.4 million in
the three months ended April 5, 2009 compared to $31.9 million in
net orders in the first three months of 2008. Backlog for our Test
& Measurement segment decreased $0.9 million to
$6.1 million at
April 5, 2009, on
$13.2 million in net orders compared to $12.3 million in
net orders for the first three months of 2008. We expect to convert
approximately 74% of the Aerospace & Defense backlog and 100% of the Test
& Measurement backlog at April 5, 2009 to
revenue during the next twelve months.
Net Revenue. The Industrial
Group primarily derives its revenue from manufacturing services and product
sales. Compared to the prior year, net revenue in the Industrial
Group decreased 46.3% or $32.3 million for
the three months ended April 5, 2009. Depressed
market conditions for heavy and light trucks and commercial vehicles have
contributed to volume related reductions in net revenue of $18.2 million. Volume
declines for trailer axles caused a $5.5 million
reduction from 2008. Revenue also declined approximately $7.9 million from
the discontinued sale of axle shafts to an automotive
customer. Further, contractual settlements and price reductions
resulted in a $4.3 million
decrease in net revenue from 2008. Partially offsetting the volume
change was an increase in steel prices, which is passed through to customers
under certain contracts, resulting in an increase in net revenue of $3.6 million.
The
Aerospace & Defense segment derives its revenue from product sales and
technical outsourced services. Aerospace & Defense segment net
revenue for the first quarter increased 29.0% or $6.8 million from
the prior year, primarily due to increased sales of link encryption products and
certain data recording products.
The Test
& Measurement segment derives its revenue from technical services and
product sales. Technical services revenue accounted for approximately
85% and 88% of total Test & Measurement revenue in the first three months of
2009 and 2008, respectively. Test & Measurement segment net
revenue increased 7.4% or $1.0 million for
the first quarter primarily due to a $0.7 million
increase in volumes of magnetic meters and a $0.5 million
increase in calibration services, partially offset by a $0.2 million
decrease in product test services.
Gross Profit. The Industrial
Group’s gross profit decreased to a loss of $2.7 million in
the first quarter of 2009 as compared to profit of $6.8 million in the
first quarter of 2008. The significant decrease in sales volume and
related loss of fixed overhead absorption resulted in a reduction in gross
profit of approximately $6.4 million. Higher
utilities combined with an increase in employee benefit related costs resulted
in a reduction in gross profit of approximately $0.7 million. The
Industrial Group also realized a decline in gross profit of $4.3 million as a
result of lower revenue from contractual settlements and pricing as compared to
the prior year period. The decreases in gross profit were partially
offset by approximately $1.9 million in
productivity improvements.
The
Aerospace & Defense segment’s gross profit increased $0.4 million in
the first quarter of 2009, primarily due to increased revenues. Gross
profit as a percentage of revenue in the first quarter of 2009 declined to 10.8%
as compared to 12.4% in the prior year period.
The Test
& Measurement segment’s gross profit increased $0.5 million for
the first quarter of 2009, primarily due to increased revenues. Gross
profit as a percentage of revenue increased to 27.2% from 25.6% in the prior
year period as a result of an increase in higher margin product
sales.
Selling, General and
Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expense remained flat
at $10.5 million and
increased as a percentage of revenue to 12.8% from 9.9% in the prior
year. The current period results include approximately $0.5 million
of non-capitalized legal and professional fees related to the debt amendment in
the first quarter of 2009.
Research and Development.
Research and development costs increased $0.2 million to
$1.2 million from
the prior year quarter primarily due to new product development efforts within
our Aerospace & Defense segment.
17
Nonrecurring Expense, Net. In
December 2008, we announced a restructuring program, which included the
closure of the Industrial Group’s Kenton and Marion, Ohio facilities and the
consolidation of Sypris Electronics and Sypris Data Systems into a single
operation within the Aerospace & Defense segment. Additionally,
we have exited several programs within the Aerospace & Defense
segment. The purpose of the restructuring program was to reduce fixed
costs, accelerate integration efficiencies, and significantly improve operating
earnings on a sustained basis. As a result of these initiatives, we
recorded, or expect to record in future periods, aggregate pre-tax expenses of
approximately $50.4 million, consisting of the following: $4.0 million
in severance and benefit costs, $12.3 million in non-cash asset
impairments, $16.1 million in non-cash deferred contract costs write-offs,
$7.9 million in inventory related charges, $1.9 million in equipment
relocation costs, $1.5 million in asset retirement obligations,
$3.2 million in contract termination costs and $3.5 million in other
restructuring charges. Of the aggregate $52.8 million in pre-tax
costs, the Company expects approximately $13.8 million to be
cash-related. Of the total program, we recorded $2.0 million, or
$0.11 per share, related to these initiatives during the three months ended
April 5, 2009, which is included in nonrecurring expense on the
consolidated statement of operations. The charge consisted of
$0.7 million for employee severance and benefit costs, $0.7 million in
equipment relocation costs, $0.1 million in non-cash asset impairments, and
$0.5 million in other various charges. See Note 5 to the
consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q.
Interest Expense. Interest
expense for the first quarter increased $0.3 million primarily due to an
increase in the weighted average debt outstanding, partially offset by a
decrease in the weighted average interest rate. Our weighted average
debt outstanding increased to $72.5 million for
the first quarter of 2009 from $53.7 million
during the first quarter of 2008. The weighted average interest rate
decreased to 5.8% in the first quarter of 2009 from 7.1% in the first quarter of
2008. However, as a result of the debt amendment during the first
quarter of 2009, our interest rate increased, which is expected to result in
higher interest expense for the balance of 2009.
Income Taxes. The provision
for income taxes in the first quarter of 2009 is associated exclusively with our
foreign subsidiaries and includes minimum taxes required to be paid in
Mexico.
Liquidity,
Capital Resources and Financial Condition
Net cash
used by operating activities was $7.9 million in
the first quarter of 2009, as compared to net cash provided of $18.6 million in
2008, primarily due to significantly lower revenues during the
quarter. Additionally net cash provided by operating activities for
the first quarter of 2008 included the receipt of $6.9 million as part of the
Dana Settlement. Accounts receivable increased within the Aerospace
& Defense segment and used $5.7 million of cash as a result of an increase
in shipments toward the end of the period. Approximately 45% of the
Aerospace & Defense segment’s shipments occurred during the last month of
the first quarter. Partially offsetting this was a decrease in
accounts receivable within the Industrial Group as a result of collection
efforts and the reduction in revenue, which provided $4.9 million of cash during
the period. Other current assets increased and used $0.2 million
primarily as a result of the timing of prepaid expenses. Inventory
decreased and provided $6.0 million
primarily as a result of a focus on bringing inventory levels down to meet
current demand. In the first quarter of 2009, accounts payable
decreased and used $5.5 million
primarily due to the timing of payments to and from our suppliers and reduced
purchases by our Industrial Group. Accrued liabilities decreased and
used $0.8 million
primarily as a result of the timing of various accruals.
Net cash
used in investing activities decreased $2.0 million to
$1.7 million for
the first three months of 2009, primarily due to lower capital
expenditures.
Net cash
provided by financing activities was $1.0 million in
the first three months of 2009, as compared to net cash used of $10.6 million in
the first three months of 2008. We borrowed an additional $2.0
million on the Revolving Credit Agreement during the three months ended April 5,
2009 as compared to making payments of $10.0 million
during the three months ended March 30, 2008. Additionally, we paid
$0.7 million in
financing fees in conjunction with modifications of our debt in
2009.
We had
total borrowings under our Revolving Credit Agreement of $45.0 million at
April 5, 2009 and an unrestricted cash balance of
$5.1 million. Approximately $2.3 million of
the unrestricted cash balance relates to our Mexican subsidiaries. In
March 2009, our Revolving Credit Agreement and Senior Notes were amended to,
among other things, i) waive the defaults as of December 31, 2008, ii) limit
total borrowings, iii) revise the maturity date for the Credit Agreement and
Senior Notes to January 15, 2010, iv) revise certain financial covenants, v)
restrict the payment of dividends, vi) require mandatory prepayment to the
extent that marketable securities or other collateral is sold outside of the
ordinary course of business, and vii) increase our interest rate
structure. As of April 5, 2009, we were in compliance with all
covenants.
18
Maximum
borrowings under the Revolving Credit Agreement are $50.0 million, and
standby letters of credit up to a maximum of $15.0 million may be issued under
the Revolving Credit Agreement, of which $2.0 million were issued
at April 5, 2009.
We also
had purchase commitments totaling approximately $28.6 million at April 5,
2009, primarily for inventory and manufacturing equipment.
Assuming we are able to
renegotiate our current Revolving Credit Agreement and Senior Notes, we
believe that sufficient resources will be available to satisfy our cash
requirements for at least the next twelve months. Our assessment of
the availability of funds for the next twelve months is based in part on our
intent to renegotiate our current Revolving Credit Agreement and Senior Notes or
to retire both of these obligations in connection with the execution of new debt
financing agreements. There can be no assurance that any additional
required financing will be available through bank borrowings, debt or equity
financings or otherwise, or that if such financing is available, it will be
available on terms acceptable to us. If adequate funds are not
available on acceptable terms, our business, results of operations and financial
condition could be adversely affected.
Cash
requirements for periods beyond the next twelve months depend on our
profitability, our ability to manage working capital requirements and our rate
of growth. If our largest customers experience financial difficulty,
or if working capital and capital expenditure requirements exceed expected
levels during the next twelve months or in subsequent periods, we may require
additional external sources of capital. There can be no assurance
that any additional required financing will be available through bank
borrowings, debt or equity financings or otherwise, or that if such financing is
available, it will be available on terms acceptable to us. If
adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms, our business, consolidated
results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely
affected.
Critical
Accounting Policies
See the
information concerning our critical accounting policies included under Item 7,
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation - Critical Accounting Policies in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. There have been no
significant changes in our critical accounting policies during the first quarter
of 2009.
Forward-looking
Statements
This
quarterly report, and our other oral or written communications, may contain
“forward-looking” statements. These statements may include our expectations or
projections about the future of our industries, business strategies, potential
acquisitions or financial results and our views about developments beyond our
control, including domestic or global economic conditions, trends and market
developments. These statements are based on management’s views and assumptions
at the time originally made, and we undertake no obligation to update these
statements, even if, for example, they remain available on our website after
those views and assumptions have changed. There can be no assurance that our
expectations, projections or views will come to pass, and undue reliance should
not be placed on these forward-looking statements.
19
A number
of significant factors could materially affect our specific business operations,
and cause our performance to differ materially from any future results projected
or implied by our prior statements. Many of these factors are
identified in connection with the more specific descriptions contained
throughout this report. Other factors which could also materially
affect such future results currently include: the effects of a continuing
economic downturn which could reduce our revenues, negatively impact our
customers or suppliers and materially, adversely affect our financial results;
our ability to liquidate our equity interests in Dana Holding Corporation at
satisfactory valuation levels; potential impairments, non-recoverability or
write-offs of goodwill, assets or deferred costs, including deferred tax assets
in the U.S. or Mexico; fees, costs or other dilutive effects of refinancing,
compliance with covenants in, or acceleration of, our loan and other debt
agreements; unexpected or increased costs, time delays and inefficiencies of
restructuring our manufacturing capacity; breakdowns, relocations or major
repairs of machinery and equipment; our inability to successfully launch new or
next generation programs; the cost, efficiency and yield of our operations and
capital investments, including working capital, production schedules, cycle
times, scrap rates, injuries, wages, overtime costs, freight or expediting
costs; cost and availability of raw materials such as steel, component parts,
natural gas or utilities; volatility of our customers’ forecasts, financial
conditions, market shares, product requirements or scheduling demands; adverse
impacts of new technologies or other competitive pressures which increase our
costs or erode our margins; failure to adequately insure or to identify
environmental or other insurable risks; inventory valuation risks including
obsolescence, shrinkage, theft, overstocking or underbilling; changes in
government or other customer programs; reliance on major customers or suppliers,
especially in the automotive or aerospace and defense electronics sectors;
revised contract prices or estimates of major contract costs; dependence on,
recruitment or retention of key employees; union negotiations; pension
valuation, health care or other benefit costs; labor relations; strikes; risks
of foreign operations; currency exchange rates; the costs and supply of debt,
equity capital, or insurance (including the possibility that our common stock
could cease to qualify for listing on the NASDAQ Stock Market due to a sustained
decline in prices per share, or that any reverse stock split or other
restructuring of our debt or equity financing could be accompanied by the
deregistration of our common stock or other “going private” transactions);
changes in licenses, security clearances, or other legal rights to operate,
manage our work force or import and export as needed; weaknesses in internal
controls; the costs of compliance with our auditing, regulatory or contractual
obligations; regulatory actions or sanctions; disputes or litigation, involving
customer, supplier, creditor, stockholder, product liability, asbestos-related
or environmental claims; war, terrorism or political uncertainty; unanticipated
or uninsured disasters, losses or business risks; inaccurate data about markets,
customers or business conditions; or unknown risks and uncertainties and the
risk factors disclosed in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
In this
quarterly report, we may rely on and refer to information and statistics
regarding the markets in which we compete. We obtained this
information and these statistics from various third party sources and
publications that are not produced for the purposes of securities offerings or
reporting or economic analysis. We have not independently verified
the data and cannot assure the accuracy of the data we have
included.
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk
|
We are a
smaller reporting company as defined in Item 10 of Regulation S-K and thus
are not required to report the quantitative and qualitative measures of market
risk specified in Item 305 of Regulation S-K.
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls
and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e)
or 15d-15(e)) required by Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b) or
15d-15(b), our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
(b) Changes in internal controls.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
Part
II.
|
Other
Information
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
None.
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
Information
regarding risk factors appears in “MD&A — Forward-Looking Statements,” in
Part I — Item 2 of this
Form 10-Q and in
Part I — Item 1A of our Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
20
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
|
On
January 12, 2009, and
March 2, 2009, the
restrictions on 49,000 and 19,610 restricted shares expired,
respectively. As a result, 9,997 and 7,276 shares, respectively, were
withheld by the Company for payment of employee payroll taxes related to such
vesting. Common shares repurchased were immediately
cancelled. The following table summarizes our repurchases during the
first quarter ended April 5, 2009:
Total Number of
|
Maximum
|
||||||||||
Total
|
Average
|
Shares Purchased
|
Number of Shares
|
||||||||
Number
|
Price
|
as a Part of
|
that May Yet Be
|
||||||||
of Shares
|
Paid per
|
Publicly Announced
|
Purchased Under the
|
||||||||
Period
|
Purchased
|
Share
|
Plans or Programs
|
Plans or Programs
|
|||||||
January 12, 2009
|
9,997
|
$
|
1.20
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
|||||
March
2, 2009
|
7,276
|
$
|
0.85
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
None.
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders
|
None.
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
21
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
Exhibit
|
||
Number
|
Description
|
|
10.1
|
Redacted
copy of 2009A Amendment to Loan Documents between JP Morgan Chase Bank,
NA, Sypris Solutions, Inc., Sypris Test & Measurement, Inc., Sypris
Technologies, Inc., Sypris Electronics, LLC, Sypris Data Systems, Inc.,
Sypris Technologies Marion, LLC and Sypris Technologies Kenton, Inc. dated
April 1, 2009.
|
|
10.2
|
Redacted
copy of Fourth Amendment to the Note Purchase Agreement dated as of
April 1, 2009 between Sypris Solutions, Inc., Sypris Test &
Measurement, Inc., Sypris Technologies, Inc., Sypris Electronics, LLC,
Sypris Data Systems, Inc., Sypris Technologies Marion, LLC, Sypris
Technologies Kenton, Inc., Sypris Technologies Mexican Holdings, LLC; and
The Guardian Life Insurance Company Of America, Connecticut General Life
Insurance Company , Life Insurance Company of North America, Jefferson
Pilot Financial Insurance Company, Lincoln National Life Insurance
Company, Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New
York.
|
|
10.3
|
Form
of Employment Agreement between Sypris Solutions, Inc. and participants in
the Sypris Solutions, Inc. Executive Long-Term Incentive Program for 2009
dated March 9, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1
to the Company’s From 8-K filed on March 13, 2009 (Commission
File No. 000-24020)).
|
|
31(i).1
|
CEO
certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
31(i).2
|
CFO
certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
32
|
CEO
and CFO certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of
2002.
|
22
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
SYPRIS
SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
||
(Registrant)
|
||
Date:
May 20,
2009
|
By:
|
/s/ Brian A. Lutes
|
(Brian
A. Lutes)
|
||
|
Vice
President & Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Date:
May 20,
2009
|
By:
|
/s/ Rebecca R. Eckert
|
(Rebecca
R. Eckert)
|
||
Controller
(Principal Accounting
Officer)
|
23