SYPRIS SOLUTIONS INC - Quarter Report: 2012 July (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended July 1, 2012

OR

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number: 0-24020

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such reports).    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  Yes    x  No

As of July 27, 2012 the Registrant had 20,184,230 shares of common stock outstanding.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

1

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except for per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

2

Table of Contents

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except for share data)

Note: The balance sheet at December 31, 2011 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for a complete set of financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENTS

(in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Sypris is a diversified provider of outsourced services and specialty products. The Company performs a wide range of manufacturing, engineering, design and other technical services, typically under multi-year, sole-source contracts with corporations and government agencies in the markets for truck components and assemblies and aerospace and defense electronics. The Company provides such services through its Industrial and Electronics Groups (Note 13).

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Sypris Solutions, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, “Sypris” or the “Company”), and have been prepared by the Company in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company’s operations are domiciled in the United States, Mexico and Denmark and service a wide variety of domestic and international customers. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated. These unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all material adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly state the results of operations, financial position and cash flows for the periods presented, and the disclosures herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. Actual results for the three and six months ended July 1, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2012. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto, for the year ended December 31, 2011 as presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income,” which is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. ASU 2011-05 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2012. This guidance eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. In addition, items of other comprehensive income that are reclassified to profit or loss are required to be presented separately on the face of the financial statements. This guidance is intended to increase the prominence of other comprehensive income in financial statements by requiring that such amounts be presented either in a single continuous statement of income and comprehensive income or separately in consecutive statements of income and comprehensive income. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

On October 26, 2009, the Company sold all of the stock of its wholly owned subsidiary, Sypris Test & Measurement, Inc. (“Sypris Test & Measurement”) for $39,000,000, of which $3,000,000 was deposited in an escrow account in connection with certain customary representations, warranties, covenants and indemnifications of the Company and is classified as restricted cash on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. During 2010, the Company was made aware of a potential indemnification claim from the purchaser of Sypris Test & Measurement, and the parties are currently engaged in binding arbitration to resolve the claim. The Company estimates that its total liability arising from this claim will not exceed $946,000, however the amounts asserted against the Company range up to approximately $6,000,000, and there can be no assurances that the Company’s estimates regarding its various defenses will be realized. The Company also incurred legal expenses of $576,000 and $799,000 during the three and six months ended July 1, 2012 in connection with the claim. These charges are included in loss from discontinued operations, net of tax in the consolidated statement of operations. In addition to the legal expenses incurred, the Company has paid $196,000 related to the claim as of July 1, 2012. The remaining amount of

6

Table of Contents

$750,000 has been reserved in accrued liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. As of July 1, 2012, the Company reclassified the $3,000,000 restricted cash balance from non-current assets to current assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, reflecting its expectation to settle the claim within the next twelve months. There can be no assurance that similar potential claims will not emerge in the future or that relevant facts and circumstances will not change, necessitating future changes to an estimated liability.

During the six months ended July 3, 2011, the Company recognized a gain of $3,000,000 in connection with a settlement with one of its customers.

As announced during the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company committed to a restructuring program, which included the closure of its Kenton, Ohio facility, significant reductions in the workforce in its Marion, Ohio facility and the integration of its Electronics Group subsidiaries. The purpose of the restructuring program was to reduce fixed costs, accelerate integration efficiencies, exit certain unprofitable product lines and significantly improve operating earnings on a sustained basis. The restructuring program was substantially complete as of December 31, 2011, and no charges were recorded during the six months ended July 1, 2012. As a result of the restructuring program, the Company recorded a charge of $130,000 for the three months ended July 3, 2011 and a gain of $123,000 for the six months ended July 3, 2011, which is included in restructuring expense, net on the consolidated statement of operations.

During 2011, the Company entered into agreements to sell certain assets and liabilities within the Industrial Group. These assets and liabilities were subsequently sold during the first quarter of 2012. The following assets and liabilities have been segregated and included in assets held for sale in the consolidated balance sheets (in thousands):

During the three and six months ended July 1, 2012, the Company recognized net gains of $13,000 and $2,625,000, respectively, related to the disposition of idle assets. Additionally, the Company recognized foreign currency translation gains of $361,000 and losses of $245,000 for the three and six months ended July 1, 2012, respectively, related to the U.S. dollar denominated monetary asset position of our Mexican subsidiary for which the Mexican peso is the functional currency. For the three and six months ended July 3, 2011, the Company recognized net gains of $499,000 and $578,000, respectively, related to the disposition of idle assets and foreign currency translation losses of $259,000 and $682,000, respectively. The gains and losses are included in other (income) expense, net on the consolidated statements of operations.

7

Table of Contents

On March 3, 2006, the Company’s largest customer, Dana Corporation (“Dana”), and 40 of its U.S. subsidiaries, filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. On August 7, 2007, the Company entered into a comprehensive settlement agreement with Dana (the “Settlement Agreement”) to resolve all outstanding disputes between the parties, terminate previously approved arbitration payments and replace three existing supply agreements with a single, revised contract running through 2014. In addition, Dana provided the Company with an allowed general unsecured non-priority claim in the face amount of $89,900,000 (the “Claim”).

The Claim provided to the Company was agreed to by the Company and Dana as consideration for the aggregate economic impact of the various elements the two parties were negotiating. After the aggregate Claim value of $89,900,000 was established, the Company recorded the claim at the estimated fair value of $76,483,000 and allocated the estimated fair value to each commercial issue negotiated. The revenues and resulting net income associated with each of those issues requiring the Company’s continued involvement was deferred and will be recognized over the applicable period of the involvement. For the six months ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011, the Company recognized into revenue $3,946,000 and $3,442,000, respectively, related to the Claim.

On August 31, 2011, the Company received 143,966 shares of Dana common stock, representing the final distribution to be received in conjunction with the settlement. On June 30, 2012, the Company sold 43,966 shares for net proceeds of $556,000 and a gain of $537,000. At July 1, 2012, the cost basis and fair value of the Company’s remaining holdings of Dana common stock were $45,000 and $1,281,000, respectively.

The Company computes earnings per share using the two-class method, which is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for common stock and participating securities. Restricted stock granted by the Company is considered a participating security since it contains a non-forfeitable right to dividends.

Our potentially dilutive securities include potential common shares related to our stock options and restricted stock. Diluted earnings per share considers the impact of potentially dilutive securities except in periods in which there is a loss because the inclusion of the potential common shares would have an anti-dilutive effect. Diluted earnings per share excludes the impact of common shares related to our stock options in periods in which the option exercise price is greater than the average market price of our common stock for the period. There were 595,000 and 489,000 potential common shares excluded from diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended July 1, 2012, respectively. There were 586,000 potential common shares excluded from diluted earnings per share for the six months ended July 3, 2011. All potential common shares were excluded from earnings per share for the three months ended July 3, 2011, because there was a loss in such period, and the effect of inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

A reconciliation of the weighted average shares outstanding used in the calculation of basic and diluted income (loss) per common share is as follows (in thousands):

8

Table of Contents

Inventory consisted of the following (in thousands):

The Company’s investment in marketable securities consists exclusively of shares of Dana common stock. The Company’s investment in Dana common stock is classified as an available-for-sale security in accordance with ASC 320-10-25, Investments – Debt and Equity Securities – Recognition, and measured at fair value as determined by a quoted market price (a level 1 valuation under ASC 820-10). The related unrealized holding gains are excluded from operations and recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the consolidated balance sheets. At July 1, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company owned 100,000 and 143,966 common shares of Dana with a market value of $12.81 and $12.15 per share, respectively. At July 1, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the gross unrealized gain was approximately $1,236,000 and $1,685,000, respectively. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary will be included in other income or expense, if and when recorded. In accordance with ASC 820-10, the fair value of the shares was valued based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical shares at July 1, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

9

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes marketable securities as of July 1, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (in thousands):

The Company is organized into two business groups, the Industrial Group and the Electronics Group. The segments are each managed separately because of the distinctions between products, services, markets, customers, technologies and workforce skills of the segments. The Industrial Group provides manufacturing services for a variety of customers that outsource forged and finished steel components and subassemblies. The Industrial Group also manufactures high-pressure closures and other fabricated products. The Electronics Group provides manufacturing and technical services as an outsourced service provider and manufactures complex data storage systems. There was no intersegment net revenue recognized in any of the periods presented.

The following table presents financial information for the reportable segments of the Company (in thousands):

10

Table of Contents

The provision for estimated warranty costs is recorded at the time of sale and periodically adjusted to reflect actual experience. The Company’s warranty liability, which is included in accrued liabilities in the accompanying balance sheets, as of July 1, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was $1,009,000 and $914,000, respectively. The Company’s warranty expense for the six months ended July 1, 2012 and July 3, 2011 was $221,000 and $187,000, respectively.

Additionally, the Company sells three and five-year extended warranties for one of its link encryption products. The revenue from the extended warranties is deferred and recognized ratably over the contractual term. As of July 1, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had deferred $2,554,000 and $2,536,000, respectively, related to extended warranties.

The Company bears insurance risk as a member of a group captive insurance entity for certain general liability, automobile and workers’ compensation insurance programs and a self-insured employee health program. The Company records estimated liabilities for its insurance programs based on information provided by the third-party plan administrators, historical claims experience, expected costs of claims incurred but not paid, and expected costs to settle unpaid claims. The Company monitors its estimated insurance-related liabilities on a quarterly basis. As facts change, it may become necessary to make adjustments that could be material to the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial condition. The Company believes that its present insurance coverage and level of accrued liabilities are adequate.

From time to time, the Company is involved in certain litigation and contract issues arising in the normal course of business. While the outcome of these matters cannot, at this time, be predicted in light of the uncertainties inherent therein, management does not expect that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.

As of July 1, 2012, the Company had outstanding purchase commitments of approximately $8,351,000, primarily for the acquisition of inventory and manufacturing equipment. As of July 1, 2012, the Company also had outstanding letters of credit of $990,000 primarily under the aforementioned captive insurance program.

The provision for income taxes includes federal, state, local and foreign taxes. The Company’s effective tax rate varies from period to period due to the proportion of foreign and domestic pre-tax income expected to be generated by the Company. The Company provides for income taxes for its domestic operations at a statutory rate of 35% and for its foreign operations at a statutory rate of 30% in 2012 and 2011. The Company’s foreign operations are also subject to minimum income taxes in periods where positive cash flows exceed taxable income. Reconciling items between the federal statutory rate and the effective tax rate also include the expected usage of federal net operating loss carryforwards, state income taxes, valuation allowances and certain other permanent differences.

The Company recognizes liabilities or assets for the deferred tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets or liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes. These temporary differences will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years when the reported amounts of assets or liabilities are recovered or settled. ASC 740 requires that a valuation allowance be established when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company evaluates its deferred tax position on a quarterly basis and valuation allowances are provided as necessary. During this evaluation, the Company reviews its forecast of income in conjunction with other positive and negative evidence surrounding the realizability of its deferred tax assets to determine if a valuation allowance is needed. Based on the current forecast, the Company has established a valuation allowance against the domestic net deferred tax asset. Until an appropriate level and characterization of profitability is attained, the Company expects to continue to maintain a valuation allowance on its net deferred tax assets related to future U.S. and certain non-U.S. tax benefits.

11

Table of Contents

Pension (benefit) expense consisted of the following (in thousands):

The Company’s accumulated other comprehensive loss consists of accumulated net unrealized gains on marketable securities, employee benefit-related adjustments and foreign currency translation adjustments.

Accumulated other comprehensive loss consisted of the following (in thousands):