TELEFLEX INC - Quarter Report: 2010 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 26, 2010
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number 1-5353
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
23-1147939 (I.R.S. employer identification no.) |
|
155 South Limerick Road, Limerick, Pennsylvania (Address of principal executive offices) |
19468 (Zip Code) |
(610) 948-5100
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(None)
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year,
If Changed Since Last Report)
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year,
If Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act). Yes o No þ
The registrant had 39,983,663 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value, outstanding as of
October 15, 2010.
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 26, 2010
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 26, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 26, | September 27, | September 26, | September 27, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share) | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenues |
$ | 442,993 | $ | 440,741 | $ | 1,325,867 | $ | 1,295,021 | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
239,926 | 244,408 | 719,650 | 716,080 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
203,067 | 196,333 | 606,217 | 578,941 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
123,441 | 113,633 | 357,748 | 344,271 | ||||||||||||
Research and development expenses |
11,013 | 9,618 | 30,927 | 27,725 | ||||||||||||
Net (gain) loss on sales of businesses and assets |
(183 | ) | | (183 | ) | 2,597 | ||||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
| | | 6,728 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring and other impairment charges |
1,141 | 4,783 | 1,679 | 13,412 | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before interest, loss on
extinguishments of debt and taxes |
67,655 | 68,299 | 216,046 | 184,208 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
20,090 | 21,074 | 58,709 | 68,470 | ||||||||||||
Interest income |
(243 | ) | (233 | ) | (637 | ) | (1,901 | ) | ||||||||
Loss on extinguishments of debt |
30,354 | | 30,354 | | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before taxes |
17,454 | 47,458 | 127,620 | 117,639 | ||||||||||||
(Benefit) taxes on income from continuing operations |
(5,986 | ) | 13,236 | 26,580 | 26,876 | |||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
23,440 | 34,222 | 101,040 | 90,763 | ||||||||||||
Operating (loss) income from discontinued operations
(including gain (loss) on disposal of $38,562 for the nine
month period in 2010 and ($3,480) and $272,307 for the three
and nine month periods in 2009, respectively) |
| (2,886 | ) | 41,301 | 275,500 | |||||||||||
Taxes (benefit) on income from discontinued operations |
905 | (7,281 | ) | 21,322 | 95,267 | |||||||||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
(905 | ) | 4,395 | 19,979 | 180,233 | |||||||||||
Net income |
22,535 | 38,617 | 121,019 | 270,996 | ||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
339 | 305 | 1,003 | 843 | ||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
| | | 9,860 | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
$ | 22,196 | $ | 38,312 | $ | 120,016 | $ | 260,293 | ||||||||
Earnings per share available to common shareholders: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic: |
||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 0.58 | $ | 0.85 | $ | 2.51 | $ | 2.26 | ||||||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
$ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.11 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 4.29 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 0.56 | $ | 0.96 | $ | 3.01 | $ | 6.55 | ||||||||
Diluted: |
||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 0.57 | $ | 0.85 | $ | 2.48 | $ | 2.25 | ||||||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
$ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.11 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 4.27 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 0.55 | $ | 0.96 | $ | 2.98 | $ | 6.52 | ||||||||
Dividends per share |
$ | 0.34 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 1.02 | $ | 1.02 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
39,933 | 39,724 | 39,879 | 39,711 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
40,254 | 39,932 | 40,269 | 39,910 | ||||||||||||
Amounts attributable to common shareholders: |
||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
$ | 23,101 | $ | 33,917 | $ | 100,037 | $ | 89,920 | ||||||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations,
net of tax |
(905 | ) | 4,395 | 19,979 | 170,373 | |||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 22,196 | $ | 38,312 | $ | 120,016 | $ | 260,293 | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
September 26, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 247,757 | $ | 188,305 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net |
294,285 | 265,305 | ||||||
Inventories, net |
359,967 | 360,843 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
21,170 | 21,872 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable |
49,541 | 100,733 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets |
58,733 | 58,010 | ||||||
Assets held for sale |
11,259 | 8,866 | ||||||
Total current assets |
1,042,712 | 1,003,934 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
292,294 | 317,499 | ||||||
Goodwill |
1,438,997 | 1,459,441 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
928,906 | 971,576 | ||||||
Investments in affiliates |
13,288 | 12,089 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets |
| 336 | ||||||
Other assets |
81,658 | 74,130 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 3,797,855 | $ | 3,839,005 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||
Current borrowings |
$ | 181,193 | $ | 4,008 | ||||
Accounts payable |
91,588 | 94,983 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
84,157 | 97,274 | ||||||
Payroll and benefit-related liabilities |
71,693 | 70,537 | ||||||
Derivative liabilities |
15,355 | 16,709 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
12,592 | 22,901 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
1,901 | 30,695 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
6,648 | | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
465,127 | 337,107 | ||||||
Long-term borrowings |
904,406 | 1,192,491 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
416,939 | 398,923 | ||||||
Pension and postretirement benefit liabilities |
134,431 | 164,726 | ||||||
Noncurrent liability for uncertain tax positions |
110,935 | 109,912 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
48,740 | 50,772 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
2,080,578 | 2,253,931 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Total common shareholders equity |
1,713,231 | 1,580,241 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
4,046 | 4,833 | ||||||
Total equity |
1,717,277 | 1,585,074 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 3,797,855 | $ | 3,839,005 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 26, | September 27, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities of Continuing Operations: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 121,019 | $ | 270,996 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
(19,979 | ) | (180,233 | ) | ||||
Depreciation expense |
36,856 | 41,058 | ||||||
Amortization expense of intangible assets |
33,101 | 32,512 | ||||||
Amortization expense of deferred financing costs |
4,425 | 4,556 | ||||||
Loss on extinguishments of debt |
30,354 | | ||||||
Gain on call options and warrants |
(407 | ) | | |||||
Debt modification costs |
2,795 | | ||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets |
| 5,788 | ||||||
Impairment of goodwill |
| 6,728 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
7,769 | 6,611 | ||||||
Net (gain) loss on sales of businesses and assets |
(183 | ) | 2,597 | |||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
28,670 | 36,888 | ||||||
Other |
(28,809 | ) | 160 | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and
disposals: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(45,343 | ) | 5,467 | |||||
Inventories |
(15,375 | ) | 1,882 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
526 | 2,087 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(12,147 | ) | (37,562 | ) | ||||
Income taxes receivable and payable, net |
3,504 | (128,817 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations |
146,776 | 70,718 | ||||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities of Continuing Operations: |
||||||||
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment |
(23,796 | ) | (20,257 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of businesses and assets, net of cash sold |
75,943 | 314,513 | ||||||
Payments for businesses and intangibles acquired, net of cash acquired |
(82 | ) | (643 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by investing activities from continuing operations |
52,065 | 293,613 | ||||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities of Continuing Operations: |
||||||||
Proceeds from long-term borrowings |
400,000 | 10,018 | ||||||
Reduction in long-term borrowings |
(460,770 | ) | (300,268 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in notes payable and current borrowings |
34,402 | (836 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from stock compensation plans |
8,470 | 750 | ||||||
Payments to noncontrolling interest shareholders |
(1,463 | ) | (702 | ) | ||||
Dividends |
(40,704 | ) | (40,521 | ) | ||||
Debt and equity issuance and amendment fees |
(48,041 | ) | | |||||
Purchase of call options |
(88,000 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from sale of warrants |
59,400 | | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities from continuing operations |
(136,706 | ) | (331,559 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows from Discontinued Operations: |
||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
(680 | ) | 24,861 | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(189 | ) | (3,488 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
| (11,075 | ) | |||||
Net cash (used in) provided by discontinued operations |
(869 | ) | 10,298 | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
(1,814 | ) | 8,444 | |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
59,452 | 51,514 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period |
188,305 | 107,275 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period |
$ | 247,757 | $ | 158,789 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(Unaudited)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | Treasury | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Paid in | Retained | Comprehensive | Stock | Noncontrolling | Total | Comprehensive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Dollars | Capital | Earnings | Income | Shares | Dollars | Interest | Equity | Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December
31, 2008 |
41,995 | $ | 41,995 | $ | 268,263 | $ | 1,182,906 | $ | (108,202 | ) | 2,311 | $ | (138,507 | ) | $ | 39,428 | $ | 1,285,883 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
260,293 | 10,703 | 270,996 | $ | 270,996 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends ($1.02
per share) |
(40,521 | ) | (40,521 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial instruments
marked to market, net
of tax of $6,005 |
13,858 | 13,858 | 13,858 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative
translation
adjustment |
60,658 | 61 | 60,719 | 60,719 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension liability
adjustment, net of
tax of $1,378 |
764 | 764 | 764 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to
noncontrolling
interest shareholders |
(702 | ) | (702 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disposition of
noncontrolling
interest |
(45,019 | ) | (45,019 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 346,337 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued under
compensation plans |
20 | 20 | 6,261 | (14 | ) | 961 | 7,242 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation |
(9 | ) | 343 | 343 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September
27, 2009 |
42,015 | $ | 42,015 | $ | 274,524 | $ | 1,402,678 | $ | (32,922 | ) | 2,288 | $ | (137,203 | ) | $ | 4,471 | $ | 1,553,563 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December
31, 2009 |
42,033 | $ | 42,033 | $ | 277,050 | $ | 1,431,878 | $ | (34,120 | ) | 2,278 | $ | (136,600 | ) | $ | 4,833 | $ | 1,585,074 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
120,016 | 1,003 | 121,019 | $ | 121,019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends ($1.02
per share) |
(40,704 | ) | (40,704 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial instruments
marked to market, net
of tax of $(44) |
(10 | ) | (10 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative
translation
adjustment |
(17,650 | ) | 38 | (17,612 | ) | (17,612 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension liability
adjustment, net of
tax of $1,273 |
2,516 | 2,516 | 2,516 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Convertible debt
discount, net of tax
of $30,344 |
50,870 | 50,870 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Call options, net of
tax of $(31,891) |
(58,853 | ) | (58,853 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warrants |
60,877 | 60,877 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to
noncontrolling
interest shareholders |
(1,463 | ) | (1,463 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deconsolidation of VIE |
253 | (365 | ) | (112 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 105,913 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued under
compensation plans |
170 | 170 | 14,525 | (13 | ) | 740 | 15,435 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation |
(6 | ) | 240 | 240 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September
26, 2010 |
42,203 | $ | 42,203 | $ | 344,469 | $ | 1,511,443 | $ | (49,264 | ) | 2,259 | $ | (135,620 | ) | $ | 4,046 | $ | 1,717,277 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Basis of presentation
We prepared the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Teleflex
Incorporated on the same basis as our annual consolidated financial statements, with the exception
of changes resulting from the adoption of new accounting guidance during the first nine months of
2010 as described in Note 2 below. Captions for certain financial statement line items have changed
to correspond with the extensible business reporting language, or XBRL, taxonomy used in the
interactive data file filed concurrently with this report; however, composition of these line items
has not changed.
In the opinion of management, our financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are of a
normal recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of financial statements for interim
periods in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and with Rule 10-01
of SEC Regulation S-X, which sets forth the instructions for financial statements included in Form
10-Q. The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial
statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
In accordance with applicable accounting standards, the accompanying condensed consolidated
financial statements do not include all of the information and footnote disclosures that are
required to be included in our annual consolidated financial statements. The year-end condensed
balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but, as permitted by Rule 10-01
of SEC Regulation S-X, does not include all disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial
statements. Accordingly, our quarterly condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements included in our Current Report on Form 8-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 27, 2010.
As used in this report, the terms we, us, our, Teleflex and the Company mean
Teleflex Incorporated and its subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise. The results of
operations for the periods reported are not necessarily indicative of those that may be expected
for a full year.
Note 2 New accounting standards
The Company adopted the following amendments to accounting standards as of January 1, 2010,
the first day of its 2010 fiscal year:
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment to Transfers and Servicing:
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance to improve
the information that is reported in financial statements about the transfer of financial
assets and the effects of transfers of financial assets on financial position, financial
performance and cash flows and a transferors continuing involvement, if any, with
transferred financial assets. In addition, the guidance limits the circumstances in which a
financial asset or a portion of a financial asset should be derecognized in the financial
statements of the transferor when the transferor has not transferred the entire original
financial asset. Upon the adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2010, the trade receivables
under the Companys accounts receivable securitization program (the Securitization Program)
that were previously treated as sold and removed from the balance sheet are now included in
accounts receivable, net, and the amounts outstanding under the Securitization Program are
accounted for as a secured borrowing and reflected as short-term debt on the Companys
balance sheet. As of September 26, 2010, the amount of secured borrowing under the
Securitization Program was $34.7 million. In addition, while there has been no change in the
arrangement under the Securitization Program, the adoption of this amendment impacts the cash
flow statement as a reduction in cash flow from operations for the nine months ended
September 26, 2010 by approximately $39.7 million and an increase in cash flow from financing
activities of $34.7 million.
Amendment to Consolidation: In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance that requires an
enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprises variable interest or
interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity (which would
result in the enterprise being deemed the primary beneficiary of that entity and, therefore,
obligated to consolidate the variable interest entity in its financial statements); to
require ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a
variable interest entity; to revise guidance for determining whether an entity is a variable
interest entity; and to require enhanced disclosures that will provide more transparent
information about an enterprises involvement with a variable interest entity. As a result of
the adoption of this guidance, the Company deconsolidated a variable interest entity, which
had revenue of approximately $10 million during 2009, because the Company did not have a
controlling financial interest. Refer to the Companys condensed consolidated statements of
changes in equity for the impact of the deconsolidation.
6
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Amendment to Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures: In January 2010, the FASB issued
an update that amends disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair value measurements.
The amendment requires new disclosures about transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 and
to provide a reconciliation of the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements presenting
purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis. In addition the amendment
clarifies existing disclosures with respect to the level of disaggregation that an entity
should provide for fair value measurement and it clarifies the disclosures surrounding the
valuation techniques and the inputs used to measure fair value. The guidance is effective for
interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the
disclosures related to Level 3 fair value measurement activity which is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2010. The amendment did not have an impact on our current
disclosures of fair value. We will provide the additional disclosures related to Level 3
pension plan assets, if any, upon the effective date for Level 3.
The Company will adopt the following new accounting standards as of January 1, 2011, the first
day of its 2011 fiscal year:
Amendment to Software: In October 2009, the FASB changed the accounting model for
revenue arrangements for certain tangible products containing software components and
nonsoftware components. The guidance provides direction on how to determine which software,
if any, relating to the tangible product is excluded from the scope of the software revenue
guidance. The amendment will be effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning on or
after June 15, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance to determine the
impact on the Companys results of operations, cash flows, and financial position.
Amendment to Revenue Recognition: In October 2009, the FASB revised the criteria for
multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements by establishing new guidance on how to separate
deliverables and how to measure and allocate arrangement consideration to one or more units
of accounting. Additionally, the guidance requires vendors to expand their disclosures
regarding multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements and will be effective prospectively for
revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or
after June 15, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the guidance to determine the impact
on the Companys results of operations, cash flows, and financial position.
Note 3 Integration
Integration of Arrow
In connection with the acquisition of Arrow International, Inc. (Arrow) in October 2007, the
Company formulated a plan related to the integration of Arrow and the Companys Medical businesses.
The integration plan focuses on the closure of Arrow corporate functions and the consolidation of
manufacturing, sales, marketing and distribution functions in North America, Europe and Asia. The
Company finalized its estimate of the costs to implement the plan in the fourth quarter of 2008.
The Company has accrued estimates for certain costs, related primarily to personnel reductions and
facility closures and the termination of certain distribution agreements, at the date of
acquisition.
The following table provides information relating to changes in the accrued liability
associated with the Arrow integration plan during the nine months ended September 26, 2010:
Balance at | Balance at | |||||||||||||||||||
December 31, | Adjustments to | September 26, | ||||||||||||||||||
2009 | Reserve | Payments | Translation | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Termination benefits |
$ | 0.4 | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | | $ | (0.1 | ) | $ | 0.1 | ||||||||
Facility closure costs |
0.5 | | (0.2 | ) | | 0.3 | ||||||||||||||
Contract termination costs |
2.7 | | | | 2.7 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 3.6 | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | (0.1 | ) | $ | 3.1 | ||||||||
Contract termination costs relate to the termination of a European distributor agreement that
is currently in litigation but is expected to be paid in 2011.
In conjunction with the plan for the integration of Arrow and the Companys Medical
businesses, the Company has taken actions that affect employees and facilities of Teleflex. This
aspect of the integration plan is explained in Note 4, Restructuring and other impairment
charges. Costs that affect employees and facilities of Teleflex are charged to earnings and
included in restructuring and other impairment charges within the condensed consolidated statement
of operations for the periods in which the costs are incurred.
7
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 4 Restructuring and other impairment charges
The following table provides information relating to the amounts included in restructuring and
other impairment charges in the condensed consolidated statements of income for the periods
presented:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 26, | September 27, | September 26, | September 27, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
2008 Commercial Segment Program |
$ | | $ | 185 | $ | | $ | 2,240 | ||||||||
2007 Arrow Integration Program |
1,141 | 1,284 | 1,679 | 5,384 | ||||||||||||
Impairment charges intangibles and fixed assets |
| 3,314 | | 5,788 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring and other impairment charges |
$ | 1,141 | $ | 4,783 | $ | 1,679 | $ | 13,412 | ||||||||
2008 Commercial Segment Restructuring Program
In December 2008, the Company began certain restructuring initiatives with respect to the
Companys Commercial Segment. The initiatives involved the consolidation of operations and a
related reduction in workforce at certain of the Companys facilities in North America and Europe.
The Company determined to undertake these initiatives as a means to improve operating performance
and to better leverage its resources due to weakness in the marine and industrial markets.
By December 31, 2009, the Company had completed the 2008 Commercial Segment restructuring
program, and all costs associated with the program were fully paid during 2009. No charges have
been recorded under this program in 2010.
The following table provides information related to the charges associated with the 2008
Commercial Segment restructuring program that were included in restructuring and other impairment
charges in the condensed consolidated statements of income for the periods presented:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||
September 27, 2009 | September 27, 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Termination benefits |
$ | 100 | $ | 2,027 | ||||
Facility closure costs |
85 | 213 | ||||||
$ | 185 | $ | 2,240 | |||||
Termination benefits were comprised of severance-related payments for all employees terminated
in connection with the 2008 Commercial Segment restructuring program.
2007 Arrow Integration Program
The following table provides information relating to the charges associated with the 2007
Arrow integration program that were included in restructuring and other impairment charges in the
condensed consolidated statements of income for the periods presented:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 26, | September 27, | September 26, | September 27, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Termination benefits |
$ | 613 | $ | 679 | $ | 933 | $ | 3,243 | ||||||||
Facility closure costs |
188 | 193 | 774 | 409 | ||||||||||||
Contract termination costs |
340 | 157 | 427 | 1,048 | ||||||||||||
Other restructuring costs |
| 255 | 3 | 684 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of assets |
| | (458 | ) | | |||||||||||
$ | 1,141 | $ | 1,284 | $ | 1,679 | $ | 5,384 | |||||||||
8
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides information relating to changes in the accrued liability
associated with the 2007 Arrow integration program during the nine months ended September 26, 2010:
Balance at | Balance at | |||||||||||||||||||
December 31, | Subsequent | September 26, | ||||||||||||||||||
2009 | Accruals | Payments | Translation | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Termination benefits |
$ | 2,183 | $ | 933 | $ | (2,198 | ) | $ | (67 | ) | $ | 851 | ||||||||
Facility closure costs |
302 | 774 | (1,058 | ) | (18 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Contract termination costs |
687 | 427 | (9 | ) | (20 | ) | 1,085 | |||||||||||||
Other restructuring costs |
23 | 3 | (3 | ) | (1 | ) | 22 | |||||||||||||
$ | 3,195 | $ | 2,137 | $ | (3,268 | ) | $ | (106 | ) | $ | 1,958 | |||||||||
Termination benefits are comprised of severance-related payments for all employees terminated
in connection with the 2007 Arrow integration program. Facility closure costs relate primarily to
costs to prepare a facility for closure. Contract termination costs relate primarily to the
termination of a European distributor agreement and leases in conjunction with the consolidation of
facilities. The gain on sale of assets included in restructuring and other impairment charges
reflects the sale of one of the properties with a zero net book value associated with the 2007
Arrow integration program in its Medical Segment.
As of September 26, 2010, the Company expects to incur the following restructuring expenses
associated with the 2007 Arrow integration program in its Medical Segment for the last three months
of 2010:
(Dollars in millions) | ||||
Termination benefits |
$ | 0.3-0.5 | ||
Facility closure costs |
0.1-0.2 | |||
Contract termination costs |
0.1-0.2 | |||
$ | 0.5-0.9 | |||
Impairment Charges
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a $2.3 million impairment charge with
respect to an intangible asset in the Marine reporting unit. See Note 5, Impairment of goodwill
and intangible assets. During the third quarter of 2009, based on continued deterioration in the
California real estate market, the Company recorded $3.3 million in impairment charges to fully
write-off an investment in a real estate venture in California. The Company initially invested in
the venture in 2004 by contributing property and other assets that had been part of one of its
former manufacturing sites.
Note 5 Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets
The Company performed an interim review of goodwill and intangible assets in the Marine and
Cargo Container reporting units during the second quarter of 2009 and determined that $6.7 million
of goodwill in the Cargo Container operations and $2.3 million of indefinite lived tradenames in
the Marine reporting unit were impaired. The Company performed this interim review as a result of
the difficult market conditions in which these reporting units were operating and the significant
deterioration in the operating performance of these reporting units, which accelerated in the
second quarter of 2009.
In performing the goodwill impairment test, the Company estimated the fair values of these two
reporting units by a combination of (i) estimation of the discounted cash flows of each of the
reporting units based on projected earnings in the future (the income approach) and (ii) analysis
of sales of similar assets in actual transactions (the market approach). Using this methodology,
the Company determined that the entire $6.7 million of goodwill in the Cargo Container reporting
unit was impaired, but that goodwill in the Marine reporting unit was not impaired. In performing
the impairment test for the indefinite lived intangibles, the Company estimated the direct cash
flows associated with the applicable intangible assets using a relief from royalty methodology
associated with revenues projected to be generated from these intangibles. Under this methodology,
the owner of an intangible asset must determine the arms length royalty that likely would have been
charged if the owner had to license that asset from a third party. This analysis indicated that
certain tradenames in the Marine reporting unit were impaired by $2.3 million.
9
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 6 Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following:
September 26, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 139,725 | $ | 150,508 | ||||
Work-in-process |
64,545 | 53,847 | ||||||
Finished goods |
192,164 | 191,747 | ||||||
396,434 | 396,102 | |||||||
Less: Inventory reserve |
(36,467 | ) | (35,259 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
$ | 359,967 | $ | 360,843 | ||||
Note 7Goodwill and other intangible assets
The following table provides information relating to changes in the carrying amount of
goodwill, by operating segment, for the nine months ended September 26, 2010:
Medical | Commercial | Total | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2009 |
$ | 1,444,354 | $ | 15,087 | $ | 1,459,441 | ||||||
Goodwill related to dispositions |
(9,224 | ) | (7,597 | ) | (16,821 | ) | ||||||
Adjustment to acquisition balance sheet |
(180 | ) | | (180 | ) | |||||||
Translation adjustment |
(3,443 | ) | | (3,443 | ) | |||||||
Balance as of September 26, 2010 |
$ | 1,431,507 | $ | 7,490 | $ | 1,438,997 | ||||||
As of September 26, 2010, there has been no goodwill impairment losses recorded against these
carrying values for goodwill.
Intangible assets consisted of the following:
Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization | |||||||||||||||
September 26, | December 31, | September 26, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Customer lists |
$ | 553,788 | $ | 559,207 | $ | 91,813 | $ | 74,047 | ||||||||
Intellectual property |
207,355 | 208,247 | 72,781 | 59,824 | ||||||||||||
Distribution rights |
21,562 | 22,094 | 17,749 | 17,066 | ||||||||||||
Trade names |
331,722 | 336,673 | 3,178 | 3,708 | ||||||||||||
$ | 1,114,427 | $ | 1,126,221 | $ | 185,521 | $ | 154,645 | |||||||||
Amortization expense related to intangible assets was approximately $10.8 million and $11.0
million for the three months ended and $33.1 million and $32.5 million for the nine months ended
September 26, 2010 and September 27, 2009, respectively. Estimated annual amortization expense for
each of the five succeeding years is as follows (dollars in thousands):
2010 |
$ | 44,100 | ||
2011 |
43,900 | |||
2012 |
43,600 | |||
2013 |
42,700 | |||
2014 |
39,800 |
10
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 8 Borrowings
The components of long-term debt are as follows:
September 26, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Senior Credit Facility: |
||||||||
Term loan facility, at an average rate of 1.55%, due 10/1/2012 |
$ | 36,123 | $ | 664,170 | ||||
Term loan facility, at an average rate of 2.80%, due 10/1/2014 |
363,877 | | ||||||
2007 Notes: |
||||||||
7.62% Series A Senior Notes, due 10/1/2012 |
| 130,000 | ||||||
7.94% Series B Senior Notes, due 10/1/2014 |
| 40,000 | ||||||
Floating Rate Series C Senior Notes, due 10/1/2012 |
| 26,600 | ||||||
2004 Notes: |
||||||||
6.66% Series 2004-1 Tranche A Senior Notes due 7/8/2011 |
145,000 | 145,000 | ||||||
7.14% Series 2004-1 Tranche B Senior Notes due 7/8/2014 |
96,500 | 96,500 | ||||||
7.46% Series 2004-1 Tranche C Senior Notes due 7/8/2016 |
90,100 | 90,100 | ||||||
3.875% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due 2017 |
400,000 | | ||||||
Other debt and mortgage notes, at interest rates ranging from 5% to 7% |
| 132 | ||||||
1,131,600 | 1,192,502 | |||||||
Less: Unamortized debt discount on 3.875% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due 2017 |
(82,194 | ) | | |||||
1,049,406 | 1,192,502 | |||||||
Less: Current portion of borrowings |
(145,000 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||
Total long-term debt |
$ | 904,406 | $ | 1,192,491 | ||||
Refinancing Transactions
In August 2010, the Company entered into a series of refinancing transactions comprised of (i)
a public offering of $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.875% Convertible Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2017 (the Convertible Notes); (ii) the amendment of certain terms of its
Senior Credit Facilities; (iii) the extension of the maturity of a portion of its borrowings under
the Senior Credit Facilities; (iv) the repayment of $200 million of borrowings under the Senior
Credit Facilities; (v) the amendment of certain terms of its Senior Notes issued in 2007 (the 2007
Notes) and 2004 (the 2004 Notes and together with the 2007 Notes, the Senior Notes) and (vi)
the prepayment of all of its outstanding 2007 Notes, which had an outstanding aggregate principal
amount of $196.6 million and were scheduled to mature in 2012 and 2014. In addition, in connection
with the issuance of the Convertible Notes, the Company received proceeds of approximately $59.4
million from the issuance of warrants on its common stock and purchased call options on its common
stock for approximately $88.0 million.
11
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table shows the impact of the various elements of the refinancing transactions:
Additional | Debt | Operating | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | Long-Term | Paid-In | Extinguishment | (Income)/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash | Assets | Debt | Capital | Costs | Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds received from: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Convertible Notes |
$ | 400.0 | $ | | $ | 400.0 | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
Sale of warrants |
59.4 | | | 59.4 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Use of proceeds: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repay term loan |
(200.0 | ) | | (200.0 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Retire 2007 Notes |
(196.6 | ) | | (196.6 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Make-whole payment 2007 Notes |
(28.1 | ) | | | | 28.1 | | |||||||||||||||||
Purchase of call options |
(88.0 | ) | | | (88.0 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||
Underwriters discounts and commissions: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Convertible Notes |
(11.0 | ) | 8.1 | | (2.9 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||
Senior Credit Facility |
(5.0 | ) | 2.5 | | | | 2.5 | |||||||||||||||||
Other
transaction fees: (1) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Convertible Notes |
(1.9 | ) | 1.4 | | (0.5 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||
Senior Credit Facility |
(3.5 | ) | 3.2 | | | | 0.3 | |||||||||||||||||
Net cash |
$ | (74.7 | ) | 15.2 | 3.4 | (32.0 | ) | 28.1 | 2.8 | |||||||||||||||
Non-cash adjustments: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity component of Convertible Notes |
| (83.7 | ) | 83.7 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Write-off unamortized debt issuance costs: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Credit Facility |
(1.6 | ) | | | 1.6 | | ||||||||||||||||||
2007 Notes |
(0.6 | ) | | | 0.6 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Mark-to-market gain on call options |
| | (2.2 | ) | | (2.2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Mark-to-market loss on warrants |
| | 1.8 | | 1.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
$ | 13.0 | $ | (80.3 | ) | $ | 51.3 | $ | 30.3 | $ | 2.4 | ||||||||||||||
(1)
Includes accrued expenses of $1.5 million for estimated transaction
fees.
Convertible Notes
On August 9, 2010, the Company issued $400.0 million of 3.875% Convertible Senior Subordinated
Notes due 2017. The Convertible Notes are governed by the Indenture, dated as of August 2, 2010,
between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee, as supplemented by the First
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 9, 2010. The Convertible Notes pay interest
semi-annually in arrears on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing on February 1, 2011,
at a rate of 3.875% per year, and mature on August 1, 2017. The Convertible Notes are the Companys
unsecured senior subordinated obligations and are (i) not guaranteed by any of the Companys
subsidiaries; (ii) subordinated in right of payment to all of the Companys existing and future
senior indebtedness (iii) junior to the Companys existing and future secured indebtedness to the
extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness.
The Convertible Notes will be convertible at the option of the holder only under the following
circumstances (i) during any fiscal quarter, if the last reported sales price of the Companys
common stock for at least 20 trading days during a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on
the last trading day of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter exceeds 130% of the conversion
price on each applicable trading day; or (ii) during the five business day period after any five
consecutive trading day period in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of
Convertible Notes is less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of the common
stock and the applicable conversion rate on each trading day during the measurement period; or
(iii) upon the occurrence of specified corporate events; or (iv) at any time on or after May 1,
2017 up to and including July 28, 2017. The Convertible Notes are convertible at a conversion rate
of 16.3084 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes, which is
equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $61.32. The conversion rate is subject to
adjustment upon certain events. Upon conversion, the Companys conversion obligation may be
satisfied, at the Companys option, in shares of common stock, cash or a combination of cash and
shares of common stock. The Company has initially elected a net-settlement method to satisfy its
conversion obligation. The
net-settlement method allows the Company to settle the $1,000 principal amount of the
Convertible Notes in cash and to settle the excess conversion value in shares, plus cash in lieu of
fractional shares.
12
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In connection with the issuance of the Convertible Notes and convertible note hedge and
warrants, the Company entered into convertible note hedge transactions pursuant to which it
purchased call options for $88.0 million ($56.1 million net of tax) in private transactions. The
call options allow the Company to receive shares of the Companys common stock and/or cash from
counterparties equal to the amounts of common stock and/or cash related to the excess conversion
value that it would pay to the holders of the Convertible Notes upon conversion. These call options
will terminate upon the earlier of July 28, 2017 or the first day all of the related Convertible
Notes are no longer outstanding due to conversion or otherwise.
The Company also entered into privately negotiated warrant transactions generally relating to
the same number of shares of common stock with each of the option counterparties. Under certain
circumstances, the Company may be required under the terms of the warrant transactions to issue up
to 19.99% of the shares of common stock outstanding on August 3, 2010, which equals 7,981,422
shares of common stock (subject to adjustments). The warrants have been divided into components
that expire ratably over a 180 day period commencing November 1, 2017. The strike price of the
warrants is approximately $74.65 per share of common stock, subject to customary anti-dilution
adjustments. Proceeds received from the issuance of the warrants totaled approximately $59.4
million.
The convertible note hedge and warrant transactions described above are intended to reduce the
potential dilution with respect to the Companys common stock and/or reduce the Companys exposure
to potential cash payments that the Company may be required to make upon conversion of the
Convertible Notes. However, the warrant transactions could have a dilutive effect with respect to
the common stock or, if the Company so elects, obligate the Company to make cash payments to the
extent that the market price per share of common stock exceeds $74.65 per share on any expiration
date of the warrants.
The initial offering of the Convertible Notes was for $350.0 million, with an overallotment
option that allowed the underwriters to purchase an additional principal amount of $50.0 million.
The underwriters exercised their option on August 4, 2010 resulting in a total offering of $400.0
million of the Convertible Notes. The Company entered into the contracts for both the call options
and warrants in connection with the Convertible Notes on August 3, 2010. Existing accounting
guidance provides that the call option and warrant contracts be treated as derivative instruments
for the one day that the overallotment option was outstanding. Once the overallotment provision was
exercised, the option and warrant contracts were re-classified to equity since the settlement terms
of the Companys call options and warrant contracts allow the Company to elect net cash settlement
or net-share settlement under both contracts. The equity components of the option and warrants will
not be adjusted for subsequent changes in fair value. As a result of
treating these instruments as derivatives prior to exercise of the
overallotment option, the Company recorded a non-cash gain on the call
options of $2.2 million and a non-cash loss on the warrants of $1.8 million, resulting in a net
gain of $0.4 million in operating income.
The Company allocated the proceeds of the Convertible Notes between the liability and equity
components of the debt. The initial $316.3 million liability component was determined based on the
fair value of a similar debt instrument excluding the conversion feature. The initial $83.7 million
($53.4 million net of tax) equity component represented the difference between the fair value or
carrying value of $316.3 million of the debt and the $400.0 million of proceeds. The related debt
discount of $83.7 million will be amortized under the interest method over the remaining life of
the Convertible Notes, which, at September 26, 2010, is approximately seven years. An effective
interest rate of 7.814% was used to calculate the debt discount on the Convertible Notes. The
following table provides interest expense amounts related to the Convertible Notes for the periods
presented:
For the Three and | ||||
Nine Months Ending | ||||
(in millions) | September 26, 2010 | |||
Interest cost related to contractual interest coupon |
$ | 2.1 | ||
Interest cost related to amortization of the discount |
$ | 1.5 |
The following table provides the carrying value of the Convertible Notes as of September 26,
2010:
(in millions) | September 26, 2010 | |||
Principal amount of the Convertible Notes |
$ | 400.0 | ||
Unamortized discount |
(82.2 | ) | ||
Net carrying amount |
$ | 317.8 | ||
13
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Senior Credit Facility
On August 9, 2010, the Company repaid $200.0 million of its term loan borrowings under its
senior credit facility and amended certain terms of its existing senior credit agreement. In
connection with the amendment, the Company extended the final maturity date of $363.9 million of
its remaining $400.0 million term loan borrowings and $366.3 million of commitments under its
$400.0 million revolving credit facility from October 1, 2012 to October 1, 2014. The extended term
loans are to be repaid in accordance with an amortization schedule, with quarterly payments of 2.5%
of the original principal amount of the extended term loans commencing on December 31, 2012. In
addition, the amendment increased the applicable interest rate margin for the extended loans and
commitments. As amended, the range of the applicable margin for borrowings bearing interest at the
base rate (generally, either the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5% or the prime rate)
increased to a range of 0.50% to 1.75%, and the range of the applicable margin for extended
borrowings bearing interest at the LIBOR rate (generally, the LIBOR rate for the period
corresponding to the applicable interest period of the borrowings plus 1.0%) increased to a range
of 1.50% to 2.75%. In addition, the commitment fee rate on unused but committed portions of the
revolving credit facility increased to a range of 0.375% to 0.50%. The actual amount of the
applicable margin and commitment fee rate will be based on the ratio of Consolidated Total
Indebtedness to Consolidated EBITDA (each as defined in the senior credit agreement).
The senior credit agreement was further amended to (i) permit an
additional $200.0 million of indebtedness for unsecured, senior subordinated or subordinated notes;
(ii) add a mandatory prepayment of term loans upon the occurrence of certain prepayments in cash of
certain Convertible Notes, either in satisfaction of the rights of the holders of such Convertible
Notes to convert or the rights of the holders of such Convertible Notes to require repurchase of
the Convertible Notes upon a fundamental change (as defined in the indenture governing such
Convertible Notes), in an amount equal to the amount used to prepay the applicable Convertible
Notes to be ratably applied to the term loans under the credit agreement and the Senior Notes;
(iii) amend the definition of Consolidated EBITDA to permit add-backs for fees and expenses
incurred in connection with the $200.0 million repayment of existing term loan borrowings under the
credit agreement and the prepayment make-whole amounts in connection with any prepayment on the
Senior Notes, with such amendment only to take effect upon the prepayment of all of the Senior
Notes or the amendment of such Senior Notes to permit corresponding add-backs; (iv) provide that,
upon the prepayment of all of the Senior Notes or the amendment of such Senior Notes to increase
the permitted leverage ratio to a level above 3.5 to 1, the credit agreement will automatically be
amended to provide for either (1) an increase of the leverage ratio covenant to 4.0 to 1 (in the
case of prepayment of the Senior Notes) or (2) an increase corresponding to an increase in the
leverage ratio covenant in the Senior Notes (up to a leverage ratio of 4.0 to 1); and (v) provide
that upon the prepayment of all of the Senior Notes or the amendment of such Senior Notes to
increase the pro forma leverage ratio restriction for permitted acquisitions to a level above 3.50
to 1, the credit agreement will automatically be amended to provide for either (1) an increase of
the pro forma leverage ratio restriction for permitted acquisitions to 3.75 to 1 (in the case of
prepayment of the Senior Notes) or (2) an increase corresponding to an increase in the pro forma
leverage ratio restriction for permitted acquisitions in the Senior Notes (up to a pro forma
leverage ratio of 3.75 to 1).
The Company has an interest rate swap covering a notional amount of $375 million designated as
a hedge against the variability of the cash flows in the interest payments under the term loan due
to changes in the LIBOR Benchmark Interest Rate. The Company has determined that the interest rate
swap may continue to be designated as a cash flow hedge with respect to the amended and extended
term loan. The amendment and extension of the term loan did not result in a substantial
modification and the critical terms of the variable rate debt (notional amount, re-pricing dates
and benchmark interest rate) were unchanged.
Senior Note Amendments
In connection with the refinancing transactions, the Senior Notes were amended to permit
certain terms of the Convertible Notes and the convertible note hedge and warrant transactions.
Specifically, the amendments to the Senior Notes amended restrictions on indebtedness, restricted
payments and swap agreements and an event of default provision in
connection with the Convertible Notes and any convertible notes the
Company may issue in the future. In addition, the holders of the Senior Notes consented to the subordination
provisions that would apply to offerings of certain Convertible Notes. The amendment also added a
mandatory offer to prepay the Senior Notes upon the occurrence of certain prepayments in cash of
certain Convertible Notes, either in satisfaction of the rights of the holders of such Convertible
Notes to convert or in satisfaction of the rights of the holders of such Convertible Notes to
require repurchase of the Convertible Notes upon a fundamental change (as defined in the indenture
governing such Convertible Notes), in an amount equal to the amount used to prepay certain
Convertible Notes to be ratably applied to the Senior Notes and the term loans under the Senior
Credit Facility.
14
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Prepayment of 2007 Notes
On August 13, 2010, the Company prepaid all of its outstanding 2007 Notes, consisting of
$130.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.62% Series A Senior Notes due 2012, $40.0 million
aggregate principal amount of 7.94% Series B Senior Notes due 2014 and $26.6 million aggregate
principal amount of Floating Rate Series C Senior Notes due 2012, at an aggregate prepayment
purchase price equal to the aggregate principal amount of $196.6 million plus a $28.1 million
prepayment make-whole amount and accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the prepayment
date. The Company recorded the $28.1 million make-whole payment, unamortized debt issuance costs of
$0.6 million incurred prior to the refinancing transactions and legal fees as loss on
extinguishments of debt during the third quarter of 2010.
Debt and equity issuance and amendment fees
The Company incurred estimated transaction fees related to the amendment of the senior credit
agreement of approximately $8.5 million for underwriters discounts and commissions and other
transaction fees. Under existing accounting guidance, the Company treated the $200.0 million
repayment of the term loan as a debt extinguishment and the remaining $400.0 million of the term
loan as a debt modification. The changes to the revolver component of the Senior Credit Facility
were also deemed to be a modification. The Company allocated the estimated transaction fees evenly
between the term loan and the revolver. Approximately $2.8 million represented estimated third
party transaction fees related to the modified term loan that were expensed in the third quarter of
2010 as selling, general and administrative expenses. The remaining $5.7 million in transaction
fees was deferred and will be amortized over the amended term of the facility as additional
interest expense. In addition, the Company expensed approximately $1.6 million of unamortized
Senior Credit Facility debt issuance costs related to the $200.0 million repayment that were
incurred prior to the refinancing transactions as loss on extinguishments of debt.
In connection with the issuance of the Convertible Notes, the Company incurred estimated
transaction fees of approximately $12.9 million for underwriters discounts and commissions and
other transaction fees. Under existing accounting guidance, the Company allocated approximately
$3.4 million to the respective equity components and the remaining $9.5 million was recorded as a
deferred asset to be amortized over the outstanding term of the Convertible Notes as additional
interest expense.
The aggregate amounts of notes payable and long-term debt maturing are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||
2010 |
$ | 36.2 | ||
2011 |
145.0 | |||
2012 |
45.2 | |||
2013 |
36.4 | |||
2014 and thereafter |
905.0 |
Note 9 Financial instruments
The Company uses derivative instruments for risk management purposes. Forward rate contracts
are used to manage foreign currency transaction exposure and interest rate swaps are used to reduce
exposure to interest rate changes. These derivative instruments are designated as cash flow hedges
and are recorded on the balance sheet at fair market value. The effective portion of the gains or
losses on derivatives are reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified
into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings.
Gains and losses on the derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components
excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings. See Note 10,
Fair value measurement for additional information.
15
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The location and fair values of derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments in
the condensed consolidated balance sheet are as follows:
September 26, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
Fair Value | Fair Value | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Asset derivatives: |
||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts: |
||||||||
Other assets current |
$ | 1,599 | $ | 1,356 | ||||
Total asset derivatives |
$ | 1,599 | $ | 1,356 | ||||
Liability derivatives: |
||||||||
Interest rate contracts: |
||||||||
Derivative liabilities current |
$ | 15,034 | $ | 15,849 | ||||
Other liabilities noncurrent |
13,499 | 12,258 | ||||||
Foreign exchange contracts: |
||||||||
Derivative liabilities current |
321 | 860 | ||||||
Total liability derivatives |
$ | 28,854 | $ | 28,967 | ||||
The location and amount of the gains and losses for derivatives in cash flow hedging
relationships that were reported in other comprehensive income (OCI), accumulated other
comprehensive income (AOCI) and the condensed consolidated statement of income for the three and
nine months ended September 26, 2010 and September 27, 2009 are as follows:
After Tax Gain/(Loss) | ||||||||||||||||
Recognized in OCI | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 26, | September 27, | September 26, | September 27, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest rate |
$ | (92 | ) | $ | (334 | ) | $ | (243 | ) | $ | 8,928 | |||||
Foreign exchange |
(387 | ) | 405 | 233 | 4,930 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | (479 | ) | $ | 71 | $ | (10 | ) | $ | 13,858 | ||||||
Pre-Tax (Gain)/Loss Reclassified | ||||||||||||||||
from AOCI into Income | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 26, | September 27, | September 26, | September 27, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | 4,042 | $ | 5,164 | $ | 13,206 | $ | 14,275 | ||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts: |
||||||||||||||||
Net revenues |
(228 | ) | (548 | ) | (206 | ) | 225 | |||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
(957 | ) | 694 | (2,812 | ) | 2,816 | ||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
2 | (287 | ) | 48 | (287 | ) | ||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
| 31 | | 235 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,859 | $ | 5,054 | $ | 10,236 | $ | 17,264 | ||||||||
For the three and nine months ended September 26, 2010 and September 27, 2009, there was no
ineffectiveness related to the Companys derivatives.
16
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides financial instruments activity included as part of accumulated
other comprehensive income, net of tax:
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ | (17,343 | ) | $ | (33,331 | ) | ||
Dispositions |
| 467 | ||||||
Additions and revaluations |
(5,864 | ) | 1,176 | |||||
Clearance of hedge results to income |
5,831 | 11,162 | ||||||
Tax rate adjustment |
23 | 1,053 | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | (17,353 | ) | $ | (19,473 | ) | ||
Note 10 Fair value measurement
The following tables provide the financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value
measured on a recurring basis as of September 26, 2010 and September 27, 2009:
Total carrying | ||||||||||||||||
value at | Quoted prices in | Significant other | Significant | |||||||||||||
September 26, | active markets | observable inputs | unobservable | |||||||||||||
2010 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | inputs (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation assets |
$ | 3,724 | $ | 3,724 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Derivative assets |
$ | 1,599 | $ | | $ | 1,599 | $ | | ||||||||
Derivative liabilities |
$ | 28,854 | $ | | $ | 28,854 | $ | |
Total carrying | ||||||||||||||||
value at | Quoted prices in | Significant other | Significant | |||||||||||||
September 27, | active markets | observable inputs | unobservable | |||||||||||||
2009 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | inputs (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation assets |
$ | 3,000 | $ | 3,000 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Derivative assets |
$ | 1,234 | $ | | $ | 1,234 | $ | | ||||||||
Derivative liabilities |
$ | 32,836 | $ | | $ | 32,836 | $ | |
The carrying amount of long-term debt reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as
of September 26, 2010 is $1,049.4 million. Using a discounted cash flow technique that incorporates
a market interest yield curve with adjustments for duration, optionality, and risk profile, the
Company has determined the fair value of its debt to be $1,187.8 million at September 26, 2010. The
Companys implied credit rating is a factor in determining the market interest yield curve.
Valuation Techniques
The Companys financial assets valued based upon Level 1 inputs are comprised of investments
in marketable securities held in trusts which are used to pay benefits under certain deferred
compensation plan benefits. Under these deferred compensation plans, participants designate
investment options to serve as the basis for measurement of the notional value of their accounts.
The investment assets of the trust are valued using quoted market prices multiplied by the number
of shares held in the trust.
The Companys financial assets valued based upon Level 2 inputs are comprised of foreign
currency forward contracts. The Companys financial liabilities valued based upon Level 2 inputs
are comprised of an interest rate swap contract and foreign currency forward contracts. The Company
has taken into account the creditworthiness of the counterparties in measuring fair value. The
Company uses forward rate contracts to manage currency transaction exposure and interest rate swaps
to manage exposure to interest rate changes. The fair value of the interest rate swap contract is
developed from market-based inputs under the income approach using cash flows discounted at
relevant market interest rates. The fair value of the foreign currency forward exchange contracts
represents the amount required to enter into offsetting contracts with similar remaining maturities
based on quoted market prices. See Note 9, Financial instruments for additional information.
17
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 11 Changes in shareholders equity
In 2007, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $300 million of
outstanding Company common stock. Repurchases of Company stock under the Board authorization may
be made from time to time in the open market and may include privately-negotiated transactions as
market conditions warrant and subject to regulatory considerations. The stock repurchase program
has no expiration date and the Companys ability to execute on the program will depend on, among
other factors, cash requirements for acquisitions, cash generation from operations, debt repayment
obligations, market conditions and regulatory requirements. In addition, the Companys senior loan
agreements limit the aggregate amount of share repurchases and other restricted payments the
Company may make to $75 million per year in the event the Companys consolidated leverage ratio
exceeds 3.5 to 1. Accordingly, these provisions may limit the Companys ability to repurchase
shares under this Board authorization. Through September 26, 2010, no shares have been purchased
under this Board authorization.
The following table provides a reconciliation of basic to diluted weighted average shares
outstanding:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 26, | September 27, | September 26, | September 27, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Shares in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Basic |
39,933 | 39,724 | 39,879 | 39,711 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive shares assumed issued |
321 | 208 | 390 | 199 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
40,254 | 39,932 | 40,269 | 39,910 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average stock options that were anti-dilutive and therefore not included in the
calculation of earnings per share were approximately 6,717 thousand and 2,820 thousand for the
three and nine month periods ended September 26, 2010 and approximately 1,923 thousand and 1,807
thousand for the three and nine month periods ended September 27, 2009, respectively. The increase
in weighted average anti-dilutive shares for the three and nine month periods ended September 26,
2010 reflects the inclusion of the warrants that were issued in connection with the Convertible
Notes. See Note 8, Borrowings for additional information.
Note 12 Stock compensation plans
The Company has two stock-based compensation plans under which equity-based awards may be
made. The Companys 2000 Stock Compensation Plan (the 2000 plan) provides for the granting of
incentive and non-qualified stock options and restricted stock awards to directors, officers and
key employees. Under the 2000 plan, the Company is authorized to issue up to 4 million shares of
common stock, but no more than 800,000 of those shares may be issued as restricted stock. Options
granted under the 2000 plan have an exercise price equal to the average of the high and low sales
prices of the Companys common stock on the date of the grant, rounded to the nearest $0.25.
Generally, options granted under the 2000 plan are exercisable three to five years after the date
of the grant and expire no more than ten years after the grant date. Restricted stock awards
generally vest in one to three years. During the first nine months of 2010, the Company granted
restricted stock awards representing 161,301 shares of common stock under the 2000 plan. The
unrecognized compensation expense for these awards as of the grant date was $9.2 million, which
will be recognized over the vesting period of the awards.
The Companys 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2008 plan) provides for the granting of various
types of equity-based awards to directors, officers and key employees. These awards include
incentive and non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards and other
stock-based awards. Under the 2008 plan, the Company is authorized to issue up to 2.5 million
shares of common stock, but grants of awards other than stock options and stock appreciation rights
may not exceed 875,000 shares. Options granted under the 2008 plan have an exercise price equal to
the closing price of the Companys common stock on the date of grant. Generally, options granted
under the 2008 plan are exercisable three years after the date of the grant and expire no more than
ten years after the grant date. During the first nine months of 2010, the Company granted incentive
and non-qualified options to purchase 590,042 shares of common stock under the 2008 plan. The
unrecognized compensation expense for these awards as of the grant date was $7.3 million, which
will be recognized over the vesting period of the awards.
Note 13 Income taxes
The negative effective income tax rate for the three months ended September 26, 2010 of
(34.3%), compared to 27.9% for the three months ended September 27, 2009, reflects the impact of
(i) beneficial discrete tax charges recorded during the third quarter of 2010 for the loss on
extinguishment of debt, a $5.7 million out of period tax adjustment, which management has determined was not material on a quantitative or qualitative basis to the prior period, associated with tax returns filed and tax audit conclusions
and (ii) a reduction
in the overall effective tax rate as a result of a shift in the mix of 2010 worldwide taxable
income toward a higher foreign concentration at lower statutory rates.
18
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 26, 2010 was 20.8% compared
to 22.8% for the nine months ended September 27, 2009. The decrease in the effective income tax
rate reflects the impact of beneficial discrete tax charges recorded during the third quarter of
2010 largely offset by the expiration of U.S. tax regulations in 2010 that enabled us to exclude
certain foreign income from our U.S. taxable income in 2009.
Note 14 Pension and other postretirement benefits
The Company has a number of defined benefit pension and postretirement plans covering eligible
U.S. and non-U.S. employees. The defined benefit pension plans are noncontributory. The benefits
under these plans are based primarily on years of service and employees pay near retirement. The
Companys funding policy for U.S. plans is to contribute annually, at a minimum, amounts required
by applicable laws and regulations. Obligations under non-U.S. plans are systematically provided
for by depositing funds with trustees or by book reserves.
In September 2010, the Company made a $30 million cash contribution to the Teleflex Retirement
Income Plan (TRIP) to improve the funded status of the pension plan.
In 2009, a number of qualifying individuals accepted the Companys offer of an early
retirement program. As a result, the Company recognized special termination benefits of $402
thousand in pension expense and $395 thousand in postretirement expense in the second quarter of
2009.
The Company and certain of its subsidiaries provide medical, dental and life insurance
benefits to pensioners and survivors. The associated plans are unfunded and approved claims are
paid from Company funds.
Net benefit cost of pension and postretirement benefit plans consisted of the following:
Pension | Other Benefits | Pension | Other Benefits | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 26, | September 27, | September 26, | September 27, | September 26, | September 27, | September 26, | September 27, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 688 | $ | 619 | $ | 183 | $ | 87 | $ | 2,123 | $ | 2,036 | $ | 653 | $ | 654 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest cost |
4,539 | 4,861 | 544 | 718 | 13,865 | 13,890 | 2,083 | 2,518 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on
plan assets |
(4,895 | ) | (3,796 | ) | | | (13,617 | ) | (11,173 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net amortization and
deferral |
1,106 | 983 | (101 | ) | 141 | 3,264 | 3,461 | 328 | 582 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Settlement gain |
| | | | (35 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Special termination
costs |
| | | | | 402 | | 395 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net benefit cost |
$ | 1,438 | $ | 2,667 | $ | 626 | $ | 946 | $ | 5,600 | $ | 8,616 | $ | 3,064 | $ | 4,149 | ||||||||||||||||
19
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 15 Commitments and contingent liabilities
Product warranty liability: The Company warrants to the original purchasers of certain of its
products that it will, at its option, repair or replace such products, without charge, if they fail
due to a manufacturing defect. Warranty periods vary by product. The Company has recourse
provisions for certain products that would enable recovery from third parties for amounts paid
under the warranty. The Company accrues for product warranties when, based on available
information, it is probable that customers will make claims under warranties relating to products
that have been sold, and a reasonable estimate of the costs (based on historical claims experience
relative to sales) can be made. The following table provides information regarding changes in the
Companys product warranty liability accruals for the nine months ended September 26, 2010 (dollars
in thousands):
Balance December 31, 2009 |
$ | 12,085 | ||
Accruals for warranties issued in 2010 |
2,662 | |||
Settlements (cash and in kind) |
(4,370 | ) | ||
Accruals related to pre-existing warranties |
472 | |||
Effect of translation |
(213 | ) | ||
Balance September 26, 2010 |
$ | 10,636 | ||
Operating leases: The Company uses various leased facilities and equipment in its operations.
The terms for these leased assets vary depending on the lease agreement. In connection with these
operating leases, the Company had residual value guarantees in the amount of approximately $9.2
million at September 26, 2010. The Companys future payments under the operating leases cannot
exceed the minimum rent obligation plus the residual value guarantee amount. The residual value
guarantee amounts are based upon the unamortized lease values of the assets under lease, and are
payable by the Company if the Company declines to renew the leases or to exercise its purchase
option with respect to the leased assets. At September 26, 2010, the Company had no liabilities
recorded for these obligations. Any residual value guarantee amounts paid to the lessor may be
recovered by the Company from the sale of the assets to a third party.
Environmental: The Company is subject to contingencies as a result of environmental laws and
regulations that in the future may require the Company to take further action to correct the
effects on the environment of prior disposal practices or releases of chemical or petroleum
substances by the Company or other parties. Much of this liability results from the U.S.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), often referred to
as Superfund, the U.S. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and similar state laws.
These laws require the Company to undertake certain investigative and remedial activities at sites
where the Company conducts or once conducted operations or at sites where Company-generated waste
was disposed.
Remediation activities vary substantially in duration and cost from site to site. These
activities, and their associated costs, depend on the mix of unique site characteristics, evolving
remediation technologies, diverse regulatory agencies and enforcement policies, as well as the
presence or absence of other potentially responsible parties. At September 26, 2010, the Companys
condensed consolidated balance sheet included an accrued liability of approximately $7.9 million
relating to these matters. Considerable uncertainty exists with respect to these costs and, if
adverse changes in circumstances occur, potential liability may exceed the amount accrued as of
September 26, 2010. The time frame over which the accrued amounts may be paid out, based on past
history, is estimated to be 15-20 years.
Regulatory matters: On October 11, 2007, the Companys subsidiary, Arrow International, Inc.
(Arrow), received a corporate warning letter from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
The letter expressed concerns with Arrows quality systems, including complaint handling,
corrective and preventive action, process and design validation, inspection and training
procedures. It also advised that Arrows corporate-wide program to evaluate, correct and prevent
quality system issues had been deficient.
The Company developed and implemented a comprehensive plan to correct the issues raised in the
letter and further improve overall quality systems. From the end of 2009 to the beginning of 2010,
the FDA reinspected the Arrow facilities covered by the corporate warning letter, and Arrow has
responded to the observations issued by the FDA as a result of those inspections. Communications
received from the FDA indicate that the FDA has classified its inspection observations as
voluntary action indicated, or VAI. This classification signifies that the FDA has concluded
that no further regulatory action is required, and that any observations made during the
inspections can be addressed voluntarily by the Company. In addition, in the third quarter of
2010, Arrow submitted and received FDA approval of all currently eligible requests for certificates
to foreign governments, or CFGs. The Company believes that the FDAs approval of its CFG requests
is a clear indication that Arrow has substantially corrected the quality system issues identified
in the corporate warning letter. The Company is continuing to work with the FDA to resolve all
remaining issues and obtain formal closure of the corporate warning letter.
20
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
While the Company continues to believe it has substantially remediated the issues raised in
the corporate warning letter through the corrective actions taken to date, the corporate warning
letter remains in place pending final resolution of all outstanding issues, which the Company is
actively working with the FDA to resolve. If the Companys remedial actions are not satisfactory
to the FDA, the Company may have to devote additional financial and human resources to its efforts,
and the FDA may take further regulatory actions against the Company.
Litigation: The Company is a party to various lawsuits and claims arising in the normal course
of business. These lawsuits and claims include actions involving product liability, intellectual
property, employment and environmental matters. Based on information currently available, advice of
counsel, established reserves and other resources, the Company does not believe that any such
actions are likely to be, individually or in the aggregate, material to its business, financial
condition, results of operations or liquidity. However, in the event of unexpected further
developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, or other similar
matters, if unfavorable, may be materially adverse to the Companys business, financial condition,
results of operations or liquidity. Legal costs such as outside counsel fees and expenses are
charged to expense in the period incurred.
Tax audits and examinations: On September 30, 2010, the applicable Statute of Limitations with
respect to the Companys consolidated U.S. Tax Returns for the years 2003-2005 expired. In
addition, on October 11, 2010, the Company received notice from the Department of Treasury that the
Joint Committee on Taxation had completed its review of the Internal Revenue Services examination
report with respect to Arrow Internationals taxable periods ended August 31, 2006 and October 1,
2007, and was taking no exception to the conclusions reached by the Internal Revenue Service. The
Company and the Internal Revenue Service had previously agreed on the conclusions reached in that
examination report. This step effectively concludes the examination of those periods. As a result
of the expiration of these Statutes and the conclusion of the Arrow International examination, the
company will record previously unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $24 million in the fourth
quarter of 2010.
The Company and its subsidiaries are routinely subject to tax examinations by various taxing
authorities. As of September 26, 2010, the most significant tax examinations in process are in the
Unites States, Germany, Czech Republic, Italy and France. In conjunction with these examinations
and as a regular and routine practice, the Company may determine a need to establish certain
reserves or to adjust existing reserves with respect to uncertain tax positions. Accordingly,
developments occurring with respect to and/or resolutions of these examinations could result in
increases or decreases to our recorded tax liabilities, which could impact our financial results.
Other: The Company has various purchase commitments for materials, supplies and items of
permanent investment incident to the ordinary conduct of business. On average, such commitments are
not at prices in excess of current market.
21
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 16 Business segment information
Information about continuing operations by business segment is as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 26, | September 27, | September 26, | September 27, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Segment data: |
||||||||||||||||
Medical |
$ | 345,041 | $ | 350,576 | $ | 1,047,005 | $ | 1,043,639 | ||||||||
Aerospace |
46,836 | 45,847 | 131,704 | 126,537 | ||||||||||||
Commercial |
51,116 | 44,318 | 147,158 | 124,845 | ||||||||||||
Segment net revenues |
$ | 442,993 | $ | 440,741 | $ | 1,325,867 | $ | 1,295,021 | ||||||||
Medical |
$ | 66,047 | $ | 73,159 | $ | 213,012 | $ | 220,363 | ||||||||
Aerospace |
8,076 | 4,554 | 17,381 | 8,611 | ||||||||||||
Commercial |
6,162 | 4,104 | 15,623 | 7,740 | ||||||||||||
Segment operating profit |
80,285 | 81,817 | 246,016 | 236,714 | ||||||||||||
Less: Corporate expenses |
12,011 | 9,040 | 29,477 | 30,612 | ||||||||||||
Net (gain) loss on sales of businesses and assets |
(183 | ) | | (183 | ) | 2,597 | ||||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
| | | 6,728 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring and other impairment charges |
1,141 | 4,783 | 1,679 | 13,412 | ||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
(339 | ) | (305 | ) | (1,003 | ) | (843 | ) | ||||||||
Income from continuing operations before
interest, loss on extinguishments of
debt and taxes |
$ | 67,655 | $ | 68,299 | $ | 216,046 | $ | 184,208 | ||||||||
Note 17 Divestiture-related activities
When dispositions occur in the normal course of business, gains or losses on the sale of such
businesses or assets are recognized in the income statement line item Net (gain) loss on sales of
businesses and assets.
The following table provides the amount of Net (gain) loss on sales of businesses and assets
for the periods presented:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 26, | September 27, | September 26, | September 27, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net (gain) loss on sales of businesses and assets |
$ | (183 | ) | $ | | $ | (183 | ) | $ | 2,597 |
During the third quarter of 2010, the Company realized a $0.2 million gain on the sale of its
interest in an affiliate in India.
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company realized a loss of $2.6 million on the sale of a
product line in its Marine business.
Discontinued Operations
On
June 25, 2010, the Company completed the sale of its rigging products
and services business (Heavy Lift), a reporting unit within its Commercial Segment, to Houston
Wire & Cable Company for $50 million and realized
a gain of $17.1 million, net of tax, from the sale of the business.
On March 2, 2010, the Company completed the sale of its SSI Surgical Services Inc. business
(SSI), a reporting unit within its Medical Segment, to a privately-owned healthcare company for
approximately $25 million and realized a gain of $2.0 million, net of tax.
During the third quarter of 2009, the Company completed the sale of its Power Systems
operations to Fuel Systems Solutions, Inc. for $14.5 million and realized a loss of $3.3 million,
net of tax.
22
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
On March 20, 2009, the Company completed the sale of its 51 percent share of Airfoil
Technologies International Singapore Pte. Ltd. (ATI Singapore) to GE Pacific Private Limited
for $300 million in cash. ATI Singapore, which provides engine repair products and services for
critical components of flight turbines, was part of a joint venture between General Electric
Company (GE) and the Company. In December 2009, the Company completed the transfer of its
ownership interest in the remaining ATI business to GE.
The prior period financial statements have been revised to present SSI and Heavy Lift
businesses as discontinued operations.
The following table presents the operating results of the operations that have been treated as
discontinued operations for the periods presented:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 26, | September 27, | September 26, | September 27, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenues |
$ | | $ | 24,952 | $ | 37,284 | $ | 191,127 | ||||||||
Costs and other expenses |
| 24,358 | 34,545 | 162,789 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment(1) |
| | | 25,145 | ||||||||||||
Loss (gain) on disposition |
| 3,480 | (38,562 | ) | (272,307 | ) | ||||||||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
before income taxes |
| (2,886 | ) | 41,301 | 275,500 | |||||||||||
Taxes (benefit) for income taxes(2) |
905 | (7,281 | ) | 21,322 | 95,267 | |||||||||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
(905 | ) | 4,395 | 19,979 | 180,233 | |||||||||||
Less: Income from discontinued operations
attributable to noncontrolling interest |
| | | 9,860 | ||||||||||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
attributable to common shareholders |
$ | (905 | ) | $ | 4,395 | $ | 19,979 | $ | 170,373 | |||||||
(1) | During the second quarter of 2009, the Company recognized a non-cash, non-tax deductible goodwill impairment charge of $25.1 million to adjust the carrying value of Power Systems operations to its estimated fair value. | |
(2) | Taxes on discontinued operations for the three months ended September 26, 2010 are related to tax returns filed and tax audit conclusions. |
Net assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations sold in 2010 were comprised of the
following:
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||
Net assets |
$ | 54,619 | ||
Net liabilities |
(11,577 | ) | ||
$ | 43,042 | |||
23
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
All statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, other than statements of historical
fact, are forward-looking statements. The words anticipate, believe, estimate, expect,
intend, may, plan, will, would, should, guidance, potential, continue, project,
forecast, confident, prospects, and similar expressions typically are used to identify
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on the then-current expectations,
beliefs, assumptions, estimates and forecasts about our business and the industry and markets in
which we operate. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to
risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and
results may differ materially from what is expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements
due to a number of factors, including our ability to resolve, to the satisfaction of the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration (FDA), the issues identified in the corporate warning letter issued to
Arrow International; changes in business relationships with and purchases by or from major
customers or suppliers, including delays or cancellations in shipments; demand for and market
acceptance of new and existing products; our ability to integrate acquired businesses into our
operations, realize planned synergies and operate such businesses profitably in accordance with
expectations; our ability to effectively execute our restructuring programs; competitive market
conditions and resulting effects on revenues and pricing; increases in raw material costs that
cannot be recovered in product pricing; and global economic factors, including currency exchange
rates and interest rates; difficulties entering new markets; and general economic conditions. For
a further discussion of the risks relating to our business, see Item 1A of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. We expressly disclaim any obligation to
update these forward-looking statements, except as otherwise specifically stated by us or as
required by law or regulation.
Overview
Teleflex is principally a global provider of medical technology products that enable
healthcare providers to improve patient outcomes, reduce infections and enhance patient and
provider safety. We primarily develop, manufacture and supply single-use medical devices used by
hospitals and healthcare providers for common diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in critical
care and surgical applications. We serve hospitals and healthcare providers in more than 140
countries.
We provide a broad-based platform of medical products, which we categorize into four groups:
Critical Care, Surgical Care, Cardiac Care and OEM and Development Services. Critical Care,
representing our largest product group, includes medical devices used in vascular access,
anesthesia, urology and respiratory care applications; Surgical Care includes surgical instruments
and devices; and Cardiac Care includes cardiac assist devices and equipment. OEM and Development
Services design and manufacture instruments and devices for other medical device manufacturers.
In addition to our medical business, we also have businesses that serve niche segments of the
aerospace and commercial markets with specialty engineered products. Our aerospace products include
cargo-handling systems, containers, and pallets for commercial air cargo, and military aircraft
actuators. Our commercial products include driver controls, engine assemblies and drive parts for
the marine industry.
Over the past several years, we have engaged in an extensive acquisition and divestiture
program to improve margins, reduce cyclicality and focus our resources on the development of our
healthcare business. We have significantly changed the composition of our portfolio of businesses,
expanding our presence in the medical device industry, while divesting many of our businesses
serving the aerospace and commercial markets. The most significant of these transactions occurred
in 2007 with our acquisition of Arrow International, a leading global supplier of catheter-based
medical technology products used for vascular access and cardiac care, and the divestiture of our
automotive and industrial businesses. Our acquisition of Arrow significantly expanded our
single-use medical product offerings for critical care, enhanced our global footprint and added to
our research and development capabilities.
We continually evaluate the composition of the portfolio of our products and businesses to
ensure alignment with our overall objectives. We strive to maintain a portfolio of products and
businesses that provide consistency of performance, improved profitability and sustainable growth.
On June 25, 2010, we completed the sale of our rigging products and services business (Heavy
Lift), a reporting unit within our Commercial Segment, to Houston Wire & Cable Company for $50
million and realized a gain of $17.1 million, net of tax, from the sale of the business.
On March 2, 2010, we completed the sale of our SSI Surgical Services Inc. business (SSI), a
reporting unit within our Medical Segment, to a privately-owned healthcare
company for approximately $25 million. We realized a gain of $2.0 million, net of tax, on this
transaction.
24
Table of Contents
During the third quarter of 2009, we completed the sale of our Power Systems operations to
Fuel Systems Solutions, Inc. for $14.5 million and realized a loss of $3.3 million, net of tax.
During the second quarter of 2009, we recognized a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $25.1
million to adjust the carrying value of the Power Systems operations to their estimated fair value.
On March 20, 2009, we completed the sale of our 51 percent ownership interest in ATI Singapore
to GE Pacific Private Limited for $300 million in cash. ATI Singapore, which provides engine
repair products and services for critical components of flight turbines, was part of a joint
venture between General Electric Company (GE) and us. In December 2009, we completed the transfer
of our ownership interest in the remaining ATI business (together with ATI Singapore, the ATI
businesses) to GE for a nominal amount.
The prior period financial statements have been revised to present SSI and Heavy Lift
businesses as discontinued operations. See Note 17 to our condensed consolidated financial
statements included in this report for discussion of discontinued operations.
The Medical, Aerospace and Commercial segments comprised 79%, 10% and 11% of our revenues,
respectively, for the nine months ended September 26, 2010 and comprised 81%, 10% and 9% of our
revenues, respectively, for the same period in 2009.
Health Care Reform
On March 23, 2010 the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was signed into law. This
legislation will have a significant impact on our business. For medical device companies such as
Teleflex, the expansion of medical insurance coverage should lead to greater utilization of the
products we manufacture, but this legislation also contains provisions designed to contain the cost
of healthcare, which could negatively affect pricing of our products. In addition, commencing in
2013, the legislation imposes a 2.3% excise tax on sales of medical devices. As this new law is
implemented over the next 2-3 years, we will be in a better position to ascertain its impact on our
business. We currently estimate the impact of the medical device excise tax will be approximately
$16 million annually, beginning in 2013. Also in the first quarter of 2010, we evaluated the change
in the tax regulations related to the Medicare Part D subsidy as currently outlined in the new
legislation and determined that it did not have a significant impact on our financial position or
results of operations.
Results of Operations
Discussion of growth from acquisitions reflects the impact of a purchased company for up to
twelve months beyond the date of acquisition. Activity beyond the initial twelve months is
considered core growth. Core growth excludes the impact of translating the results of international
subsidiaries at different currency exchange rates from year to year and the comparable activity of
divested companies within the most recent twelve-month period.
Revenues
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 26, | September 27, | September 26, | September 27, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenues |
$ | 443.0 | $ | 440.7 | $ | 1,325.9 | $ | 1,295.0 |
Net revenues for the third quarter of 2010 increased approximately 1% to $443.0 million from
$440.7 million in the third quarter of 2009. Core growth for the quarter was 4%, offset by foreign
currency translation which negatively impacted sales by 2%. The deconsolidation of a variable
interest entity in our Medical Segment in the first quarter of 2010 due to the adoption of new
accounting guidance caused an additional 1% decline in revenue. Core revenues were higher in the
Aerospace Segment (5%), due to improving conditions in commercial aviation markets, and in the
Commercial Segment (15%), as recreational boating markets recover from the depressed levels of
2009. Core revenues in the Medical Segment were 2% higher than the third quarter of 2009 as the
negative impact of a voluntary recall of a product in our critical care product group and lower
sales of orthopedic devices sold to medical original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, was more
than offset by higher sales of other critical care, surgical and cardiac care products.
Net revenues for the first nine months of 2010 increased approximately 2% to $1,325.9 million
from $1,295.0 million in 2009. Core growth was 3%, while the disposition of a product line in the
Commercial Segment during the first quarter of 2009 and the deconsolidation of an entity in the
Medical Segment in the first quarter of 2010 resulted in an aggregate 1% decline in revenues. Each
of our three segments reported higher core revenues: Medical (1%), Aerospace (5%) and Commercial
(19%).
25
Table of Contents
Gross profit
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 26, | September 27, | September 26, | September 27, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 203.1 | $ | 196.3 | $ | 606.2 | $ | 578.9 | ||||||||
Percentage of sales |
45.8 | % | 44.5 | % | 45.7 | % | 44.7 | % |
For the third quarter and for the nine month periods ended September 26, 2010, gross profit as
a percentage of revenues increased in each of our three segments compared to the corresponding
periods of 2009 as a result of core growth, and, in the Medical Segment, due to the stronger
Canadian dollar as compared to the same periods in 2009.
Selling, general and administrative
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 26, | September 27, | September 26, | September 27, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
$ | 123.4 | $ | 113.6 | $ | 357.7 | $ | 344.3 | ||||||||
Percentage of sales |
27.9 | % | 25.8 | % | 27.0 | % | 26.6 | % |
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues for the third quarter
of 2010 increased to 27.9% from 25.8% in 2009. The $10 million increase in costs was due to
approximately $8 million of higher spending, principally related to Medical Segment sales,
marketing, regulatory and administrative activities and approximately $2 million of professional
fees incurred in connection with our debt refinancing during the third quarter.
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues for the first nine
months of 2010 increased to 27.0% from 26.6% in 2009. The $13 million increase in costs was
principally related to $18 million in higher costs in the Medical Segment largely due to sales,
marketing, regulatory and administrative activities, partially offset by reductions in the
Aerospace and Commercial segments and Corporate costs of approximately $5 million.
Research and development
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 26, | September 27, | September 26, | September 27, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
$ | 11.0 | $ | 9.6 | $ | 30.9 | $ | 27.7 | ||||||||
Percentage of sales |
2.5 | % | 2.2 | % | 2.3 | % | 2.1 | % |
Higher levels of research and development expenses reflect increased investments related to
antimicrobial technologies and the establishment of an innovation center in Malaysia.
Interest expense
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 26, | September 27, | September 26, | September 27, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | 20.1 | $ | 21.1 | $ | 58.7 | $ | 68.5 | ||||||||
Average interest rate on debt |
5.6 | % | 5.8 | % | 5.6 | % | 5.8 | % |
Interest expense decreased in the third quarter of 2010 compared to the same period of 2009
due to a reduction of approximately $123 million in average outstanding debt. For the first nine
months of 2010, average outstanding debt was approximately $178 million lower compared to the
corresponding period of 2009.
26
Table of Contents
Loss on extinguishments of debt
During the three and nine months ended September 26, 2010 we recognized $30.4 million of
losses on the extinguishment of debt as a result of our refinancing transactions, which are
described in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements included in this report. In connection
with the prepayment of our Senior Notes issued in 2007 (the 2007 Notes), we recognized debt
extinguishment costs of approximately $28.8 million relating to the prepayment make-whole fee of
$28.1 million, the write-off of $0.6 million of unamortized debt issuance costs incurred prior to
the refinancing transactions and related legal fees. In connection with the repayment of $200
million of our Senior Credit Facility, we recognized additional losses on the extinguishment of
debt of $1.6 million related to the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs incurred prior to
the refinancing transactions.
Taxes on income from continuing operations
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 26, | September 27, | September 26, | September 27, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Effective income tax rate |
(34.3) | % | 27.9 | % | 20.8 | % | 22.8 | % |
The negative effective income tax rate for the three months ended September 26, 2010 of
(34.3%), compared to 27.9% for the three months ended September 27, 2009, reflects the impact of
(i) beneficial discrete tax charges recorded during the third quarter of 2010 for the loss on
extinguishment of debt, a $5.7 million out of period tax adjustment, which management has determined was not material on a quantitative or qualitative basis to the prior period, associated with tax returns filed and tax audit conclusions
and (ii) a reduction in the overall effective tax rate as a result of a shift in the mix of 2010
worldwide taxable income toward a higher foreign concentration at lower statutory rates.
The effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 26, 2010 was 20.8% compared
to 22.8% for the nine months ended September 27, 2009. The decrease in the effective income tax
rate reflects the impact of beneficial discrete tax charges recorded during the third quarter of
2010 largely offset by the expiration of U.S. tax regulations in 2010 that enabled us to exclude
certain foreign income from our U.S. taxable income in 2009.
Goodwill impairment
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 26, | September 27, | September 26, | September 27, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 6.7 |
We performed an interim review of goodwill for our Cargo Container reporting unit during the
second quarter of 2009 as a result of the difficult market conditions confronting the Cargo
Container reporting unit and the significant deterioration in its operating performance, which
accelerated in the second quarter of 2009. Upon conclusion of this review, we determined that
goodwill in the Cargo Container operations was impaired, and we recorded an impairment charge of
$6.7 million in the second quarter of 2009.
Restructuring and other impairment charges
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 26, | September 27, | September 26, | September 27, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
2008 Commercial Segment Restructuring Program |
$ | | $ | 0.2 | $ | | $ | 2.2 | ||||||||
2007 Arrow Integration Program |
1.1 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 5.4 | ||||||||||||
Impairment charges intangibles and fixed assets |
| 3.3 | | 5.8 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring and other impairment charges |
$ | 1.1 | $ | 4.8 | $ | 1.7 | $ | 13.4 | ||||||||
In December 2008, we began certain restructuring initiatives that affected the Commercial
Segment. These initiatives involved the consolidation of operations and a related reduction in
workforce at three of our facilities in Europe and North America. We determined to undertake these
initiatives to improve operating performance and to better leverage our existing resources in light
of expected weakness in the marine and industrial markets. By December 31, 2009, we had completed
the 2008 Commercial Segment restructuring program and all costs associated with the program were
fully paid during 2009. Therefore, no charges were recorded under this program in 2010. We expect
to realize annual pre-tax savings of between $3.5 $4.5 million in 2010 as a result of actions
taken in connection with this program.
27
Table of Contents
In connection with the acquisition of Arrow in 2007, we formulated a plan related to the
integration of Arrow and our other Medical businesses. The integration plan focused on the closure
of Arrow corporate functions and the consolidation of manufacturing, sales, marketing and
distribution functions in North America, Europe and Asia. Costs related to actions that affected
employees and facilities of Arrow have been included in the allocation of the purchase price of
Arrow. Costs related to actions that affected employees and facilities of Teleflex are charged to
earnings and included in restructuring and impairment charges within the condensed consolidated
statement of operations. These costs amounted to approximately $1.1 million and $1.7 million during
the three and nine months ended September 26, 2010, respectively. As of September 26, 2010, we
estimate that, for the remainder of 2010, the aggregate of future restructuring and impairment
charges that we will incur in connection with the Arrow integration plan are approximately $0.5 -
$0.9 million. Of this amount, $0.3 $0.5 million relates to employee termination costs, $0.1 -
$0.2 million relates to facility closure costs and $0.1 $0.2 million relates to contract
termination costs associated with the termination of a European distributor agreement. We expect to
have realized aggregate annual pre-tax savings of between $70 $75 million after these integration
and restructuring actions are complete.
For additional information regarding our restructuring programs, see Note 4 to our condensed
consolidated financial statements included in this report.
Segment Reviews
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
% | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 26, | September 27, | Increase/ | September 26, | September 27, | Increase/ | |||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | (Decrease) | 2010 | 2009 | (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | (Dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Medical |
$ | 345.1 | $ | 350.6 | (2 | ) | $ | 1,047.0 | $ | 1,043.7 | | |||||||||||||
Aerospace |
46.8 | 45.8 | 2 | 131.7 | 126.5 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
51.1 | 44.3 | 15 | 147.2 | 124.8 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||
Segment net revenues |
$ | 443.0 | $ | 440.7 | 1 | $ | 1,325.9 | $ | 1,295.0 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
Medical |
$ | 66.0 | $ | 73.2 | (10 | ) | $ | 213.0 | $ | 220.4 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||
Aerospace |
8.1 | 4.5 | 80 | 17.4 | 8.6 | 102 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
6.2 | 4.1 | 51 | 15.6 | 7.7 | 103 | ||||||||||||||||||
Segment operating
profit
(1) |
$ | 80.3 | $ | 81.8 | (2 | ) | $ | 246.0 | $ | 236.7 | 4 | |||||||||||||
(1) | See Note 16 of our condensed consolidated financial statements for a reconciliation of segment operating profit to income from continuing operations before interest, loss on extinguishments of debt and taxes. |
The percentage changes in net revenues during the three and nine months ended September 26,
2010 compared to the same period in 2009 are due to the following factors:
% Increase/ (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 vs. 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Medical | Aerospace | Commercial | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three | Nine | Three | Nine | Three | Nine | Three | Nine | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Months | Months | Months | Months | Months | Months | Months | Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Core growth |
2 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 15 | 19 | 4 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency impact |
(3 | ) | | (3 | ) | (1 | ) | | 1 | (2 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dispositions(a) |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | | | | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Total change |
(2 | ) | | 2 | 4 | 15 | 18 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | Dispositions includes the impact of a deconsolidation of a variable interest entity in the Medical Segment in the first quarter of 2010 as a result of the adoption of new accounting guidance. See Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report for information on the new accounting guidance. |
28
Table of Contents
The following is a discussion of our segment operating results.
Comparison of the three and nine months ended September 26, 2010 and September 27, 2009
Medical
Medical Segment net revenues declined 2% in the third quarter of 2010 to $345.1 million, from
$350.6 million in the same period last year. The decrease was a result of foreign currency
movements (3%) and the impact of the deconsolidation of a variable interest entity due to the
adoption of new accounting guidance in the first quarter of 2010 (1%), which more than offset the
increase in core revenue (2%). Core revenue increases in respiratory, urology, anesthesia,
surgical, cardiac care and specialty products sold to medical OEMs were somewhat offset by a
decline in vascular access sales. The decline in vascular access sales was due to the voluntary
recall of custom IV tubing product that was announced in February 2010.
Net revenues for the first nine months of 2010 of $1,047.0 million were essentially unchanged
from the $1,043.7 million reported in the same period last year, as core growth of 1% was offset by
the impact of the deconsolidation of a variable interest entity (1%). The increase in core revenue
was predominantly in the European and Asia/Latin American critical care product groups and OEM
specialty sutures and other devices, offset by declines in OEM orthopedic implant products and in
North American surgical products.
Information regarding net revenues by product group is provided in the following tables.
% Increase/ (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Currency | |||||||||||||||||||
September 26, | September 27, | Core | Impact/ | Total | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Growth | Other | Change | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Critical Care |
$ | 226.2 | $ | 231.5 | | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||||||
Surgical |
61.6 | 61.4 | 3 | (3 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Cardiac Care |
17.4 | 16.9 | 6 | (3 | ) | 3 | ||||||||||||||
OEM |
39.5 | 37.6 | 7 | (2 | ) | 5 | ||||||||||||||
Other |
0.4 | 3.2 | (18 | ) | (70 | )(a) | (88 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total net sales |
$ | 345.1 | $ | 350.6 | 2 | (4 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||||||
% Increase/ (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended | Currency | |||||||||||||||||||
September 26, | September 27, | Core | Impact/ | Total | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Growth | Other | Change | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Critical Care |
$ | 685.7 | $ | 680.5 | 1 | | 1 | |||||||||||||
Surgical |
191.0 | 192.1 | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||
Cardiac Care |
54.5 | 51.6 | 6 | | 6 | |||||||||||||||
OEM |
113.8 | 109.4 | 5 | (1 | ) | 4 | ||||||||||||||
Other |
2.0 | 10.1 | (13 | ) | (67 | )(a) | (80 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total net sales |
$ | 1,047.0 | $ | 1,043.7 | 1 | (1 | ) | | ||||||||||||
(a) | Other in 2009 included the net revenues of a variable interest entity that was deconsolidated in the first quarter of 2010 as a result of the adoption of new accounting guidance. See Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements for information on the new accounting guidance. |
29
Table of Contents
Medical Segment net revenues for the nine months ended September 26, 2010 and September 27,
2009, respectively, by geographic location were as follows:
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
North America |
52 | % | 53 | % | ||||
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
36 | % | 36 | % | ||||
Asia and Latin America |
12 | % | 11 | % |
The recall of our custom IV tubing product during the first quarter of 2010, which contributed
to a decline in vascular access sales, had a negative impact on sales of our critical care products
during the three and nine month periods ended September 26, 2010. This impact on the third quarter
was offset by higher sales of anesthesia products (principally in Europe and North America) and
respiratory products in Asia/Latin America compared with the prior year quarter.
Surgical core revenue increased approximately 3% in the third quarter of 2010 compared with
2009, primarily attributed to higher sales in Europe and Asia/Latin America. For the first nine
months of 2010, surgical core revenue decreased 1% due to lower sales of general instrument and
closure devices, mainly in North America which were partially offset by higher ligation sales in
Europe and Asia/Latin America.
Core revenue of cardiac care products during the third quarter of 2010 compare favorably to
the same period of 2009 due to higher sales of intra aortic balloon pumps and catheters, primarily
in European markets.
Core revenue to OEMs increased 7% in the third quarter of 2010 and 5% for the first nine
months of 2010 compared with 2009. This increase is largely attributable to higher sales of
specialty suture and catheter fabrication products, partially offset by lower sales of orthopedic
implant products due to customer inventory rebalancing, a reduction in new product launches by OEM
customers and overall weakness in the OEM orthopedic markets.
Operating profit in the Medical Segment decreased 10%, from $73.2 million in the third quarter
of 2009 to $66.0 million during the third quarter of 2010. Operating profit during the third
quarter of 2010 was unfavorably impacted by approximately $9 million higher spending on sales,
marketing, regulatory, administrative and research and development activities. This higher spending
and the stronger US dollar against the Euro more than offset the additional gross profit from the
2% core revenue growth during the quarter.
Medical Segment operating profit decreased 3%, from $220.4 million during the first nine
months of 2009 to $213.0 million during the first nine months of 2010. The positive impact on
operating profit from a weaker U.S. dollar against the Canadian dollar and approximately $6 million
of lower manufacturing costs during the first nine months of 2010 as a result of cost reduction
initiatives, including restructuring and integration activities in connection with the Arrow
acquisition and $3 million lower expenses related to the remediation of FDA regulatory issues, were
more than offset by approximately $24 million higher spending on sales, marketing, regulatory,
administrative and research and development activities.
Aerospace
Aerospace Segment revenues increased 2% in the third quarter of 2010 to $46.8 million, from
$45.8 million in the same period in 2009 and increased 4% for the first nine months of 2010 to
$131.7 million, from $126.5 million in the first nine months of 2009. During the third quarter,
core revenue increased 5%, while currency movements decreased sales by 3%. Higher sales of (i)
cargo system spare components and repairs, (ii) actuation products, (iii) narrow-body cargo
handling systems and (iv) cargo containers were somewhat offset by lower sales of wide-body cargo
handling systems to aircraft manufacturers and cargo systems for aftermarket conversions. For the
first nine months of 2010, core revenue increased 5%, while currency movements decreased sales by
1% compared to the same period of 2009. The core growth is due principally to higher sales of
wide-body cargo handling systems, cargo system spare components and repairs, and actuation
products, which were somewhat offset by lower sales of narrow-body cargo handling systems.
Segment operating profit increased 80% in the third quarter of 2010 to $8.1 million, compared
to $4.5 million in the same period of 2009, and increased 102% for the first nine months of 2010 to
$17.4 million, compared to $8.6 million for the first nine months of 2009. The increase in
operating profit for the third quarter was primarily due to a favorable sales mix of higher margin
cargo system spare components and repairs, and manufacturing efficiencies achieved in the
production of wide-body cargo handling systems for aircraft manufacturers. The higher operating
profit for the first nine months of 2010 compared to the same period of 2009 is a result of
essentially the same factors applicable to the third quarter operating profit increase. In
addition, operating profit for the nine months ended September 26, 2010 was adversely affected by
the impact of a $1.2 million write-down of certain actuation products to net realizable value
during the second quarter of 2009.
30
Table of Contents
Commercial
Commercial Segment revenues increased approximately 15% in the third quarter of 2010 to $51.1
million, from $44.3 million in the same period last year. Core growth accounted for the entire
increase in sales. Higher sales of marine products to OEM manufacturers for the recreational boat
market and spare parts in the marine aftermarket accounted for 17% of sales growth while lower
sales of industrial non-marine products negatively impacted sales growth 2%. Higher sales of Marine
products are indicative of improved conditions in that sector compared to the significantly
depressed conditions that existed during the third quarter of 2009.
Commercial Segment revenues increased approximately 18% in the first nine months of 2010 to
$147.2 million, from $124.8 million in the same period last year. Core growth of 19% and favorable
currency movements of 1% were partially offset by the impact from the divestiture of a marine
product line in the first quarter of 2009 (2%). Higher sales of marine products to OEM
manufacturers for the recreational boat market and spare parts in the marine aftermarket accounted
for 22% of sales growth while lower sales of industrial non-marine products negatively impacted
sales growth by 4%.
During the third quarter of 2010, operating profit in the Commercial Segment increased 51% to
$6.2 million, compared to $4.1 million in the third quarter of 2009. The trend in operating income
was primarily the result of higher sales volumes.
For the first nine months of 2010, Commercial Segment operating income increased 103% to $15.6
million, compared to $7.7 million for the same period last year. This increase principally was due
to higher sales volumes of marine products to OEM manufacturers for the recreational boat market
and spare parts in the marine aftermarket, as well as a reduction in factory costs of approximately
$2.0 million resulting from facility consolidations in 2009.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Refinancing Transactions
In August 2010, we entered into a series of refinancing transactions comprised of (i) a public
offering of $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.875% Convertible Senior Subordinated
Notes due 2017 (the Convertible Notes), (ii) the amendment of certain terms of our senior credit
facilities, (iii) the extension of the maturity of a portion of our borrowings under the senior
credit facilities, (iv) the repayment of $200.0 million of borrowings under the senior credit
facilities, (v) the amendment of certain terms of our Senior Notes and (vi) the prepayment of all
of our 2007 Notes, which had an outstanding aggregate principal amount of $196.6 million and were
scheduled to mature in 2012 and 2014. The refinancing transactions were designed to improve near
term liquidity and financial flexibility by extending debt maturities. Debt maturities before and
after the refinancing are summarized as follows:
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maturity schedule: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prior to refinancing |
$ | 41.1 | $ | 145.0 | $ | 756.6 | $ | | $ | 136.5 | $ | | $ | 90.1 | $ | | ||||||||||||||||
After refinancing |
$ | 36.2 | $ | 145.0 | $ | 45.2 | $ | 36.4 | $ | 414.9 | $ | | $ | 90.1 | $ | 400.0 |
Cash Flows
Operating activities from continuing operations provided net cash of approximately $146.8 million
during the first nine months of 2010. Year over year cash flow from operating activities increased
$76.1 million from the first nine months of 2009. The increase is due to lower tax payments in 2010
primarily related to the absence of the $97 million tax payment in 2009 related to the sale of the
ATI businesses, a tax refund of $59.5 million in 2010 and lower payments for restructuring and
integration programs. The increase was partly offset by a $24.6 million increase in our
contributions to domestic defined benefit pension plans in 2010 over the comparable period in 2009
and a decrease of $39.7 million that resulted from the adoption of an amendment to Financial
Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification topic 860, Transfers and Servicing
(ASC topic 860) in the first quarter of 2010. Specifically, upon adoption of the amendment, the
accounts receivable that we previously treated as sold and removed from the balance sheet under our
securitization program are now required to be accounted for as secured borrowings and reflected as
short-term debt on our balance sheet. The effect of the amendment is reflected in our condensed
consolidated statements of cash flows under financing activities in the increase (decrease) in
notes payable and current borrowings and under operating activities in the accounts receivable use
of cash.
Investing activities from continuing operations provided net cash of $52.1 million during the
first nine months of 2010, primarily reflecting $24.7 million in proceeds from the sale of SSI and
$50.0 million from the sale of Heavy Lift, partly offset by capital expenditures of $23.8 million.
31
Table of Contents
Financing activities from continuing operations used net cash of $136.7 million during the
first nine months of 2010. During the third quarter of 2010, we refinanced a portion of our
long-term debt. On August 9, 2010, we issued $400.0 million principal amount of Convertible Notes.
We used approximately $88.0 million of the proceeds to purchase call options which was partially
offset by the receipt of $59.4 million from the sale of warrants. We used $200.0 million of the
proceeds to repay term loan borrowings under our senior credit facility. In connection with the
refinancing transactions we incurred $21.4 million of transaction fees and expenses, including
underwriters discounts and commissions. We used the remainder of the net proceeds, together with
available cash, to prepay all of our outstanding 2007 Notes at an aggregate prepayment purchase
price equal to the aggregate outstanding principal amount of $196.6 million and a $28.1 million
prepayment make-whole amount on the 2007 Notes. In addition, we paid
$40.7 million of dividends.
These reductions in cash flows from financing activities were partly offset by the $34.7 million
effect in notes payable and current borrowings of reflecting the securitization program as a
secured borrowing in 2010.
Other Liquidity
In 2007, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $300 million of our
outstanding common stock. Repurchases of our stock under the Board authorization may be made from
time to time in the open market and may include privately-negotiated transactions as market
conditions warrant and subject to regulatory considerations. The stock repurchase program has no
expiration date and our ability to execute on the program will depend on, among other factors, cash
requirements for acquisitions, cash generation from operations, debt repayment obligations, market
conditions and regulatory requirements. In addition, our senior loan agreements limit the
aggregate amount of share repurchases and other restricted payments we may make to $75 million per
year in the event our consolidated leverage ratio exceeds 3.5 to 1. Accordingly, these provisions
may limit our ability to repurchase shares under this Board authorization. Through September 26,
2010, no shares have been purchased under this Board authorization.
The following table provides our net debt to total capital ratio:
September 26, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||
Net debt includes: |
||||||||
Current borrowings |
$ | 181.2 | $ | 4.0 | ||||
Long-term borrowings |
904.4 | 1,192.5 | ||||||
Total debt |
1,085.6 | 1,196.5 | ||||||
Less: Cash and cash equivalents |
247.8 | 188.3 | ||||||
Net debt |
$ | 837.8 | $ | 1,008.2 | ||||
Total capital includes: |
||||||||
Net debt |
$ | 837.8 | $ | 1,008.2 | ||||
Total common shareholders equity |
1,713.2 | 1,580.2 | ||||||
Total capital |
$ | 2,551.0 | $ | 2,588.4 | ||||
Percent of net debt to total capital |
33 | % | 39 | % |
Our senior credit agreement and senior note agreements, which we refer to as the senior loan
agreements, contain covenants that, among other things, limit or restrict our ability, and the
ability of our subsidiaries, to incur debt, create liens, consolidate, merge or dispose of certain
assets, make certain investments, engage in acquisitions, pay dividends on, repurchase or make
distributions in respect of capital stock and enter into swap agreements. These agreements also
require us to maintain a Consolidated Leverage Ratio (generally, Consolidated Total Indebtedness to
Consolidated EBITDA, each as defined in the senior credit agreement) and a Consolidated Interest
Coverage Ratio (generally, Consolidated EBITDA to Consolidated Interest Expense, each as defined in
the senior credit agreement) at specified levels as of the last day of any period of four
consecutive fiscal quarters ending on or nearest to the end of each calendar quarter, calculated
pursuant to the definitions and methodology set forth in the senior credit agreement.
We believe that our cash flow from operations and our ability to access additional funds
through credit facilities will enable us to fund our operating requirements and capital
expenditures and meet debt obligations. As of September 26, 2010, we had no outstanding borrowings
and approximately $4 million in outstanding standby letters of credit issued under our $400 million
revolving credit facility. Depending on conditions in the capital markets and other factors, we
will from time to time consider other financing transactions, the proceeds of which could be used
to refinance current indebtedness or for other purposes.
32
Table of Contents
Potential Tax Legislation
President Obama and the U.S. Treasury Department proposed, on May 5, 2009, changing certain
tax rules for U.S. corporations doing business outside the United States. The proposed changes
would limit the ability of U.S. corporations to deduct expenses
attributable to foreign earnings, modify the foreign tax credit rules and further restrict the
ability of U.S. corporations to transfer funds between foreign subsidiaries without triggering U.S.
income tax. It is unclear whether these proposed tax reforms will be enacted or, if enacted, what
the ultimate scope of the reforms will be. Depending on their content, such reforms, if enacted,
could have an adverse effect on our future operating results.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
See the information set forth in Part II, Item 7A of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. In addition, in connection with the public offering
of the Convertible Notes, the Company entered into certain convertible note hedge and warrant
transactions, which could have a dilutive effect with respect to the common stock or, if the
Company so elects, obligate the Company to make certain cash payments. For additional information
regarding the terms of the convertible note hedge and warrant transactions, see Note 8 to the
consolidated financial statements included in this report. For additional information regarding
certain risks associated with the convertible note hedge and warrant transactions, see the risk
factors included in Exhibit 99.1 to this report.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this report are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the
information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SECs rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
disclosure. A controls system cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the
controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all
control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.
(b) Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during our most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
33
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On October 11, 2007, the Companys subsidiary, Arrow International, Inc. (Arrow), received a
corporate warning letter from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The letter expressed
concerns with Arrows quality systems, including complaint handling, corrective and preventive
action, process and design validation, inspection and training procedures. It also advised that
Arrows corporate-wide program to evaluate, correct and prevent quality system issues had been
deficient.
The Company developed and implemented a comprehensive plan to correct the issues raised in the
letter and further improve overall quality systems. From the end of 2009 to the beginning of 2010,
the FDA reinspected the Arrow facilities covered by the corporate warning letter, and Arrow has
responded to the observations issued by the FDA as a result of those inspections. Communications
received from the FDA indicate that the FDA has classified its inspection observations as
voluntary action indicated, or VAI. This classification signifies that the FDA has concluded
that no further regulatory action is required, and that any observations made during the
inspections can be addressed voluntarily by the Company. In addition, in the third quarter of
2010, Arrow submitted and received FDA approval of all currently eligible requests for certificates
to foreign governments, or CFGs. The Company believes that the FDAs approval of its CFG requests
is a clear indication that Arrow has substantially corrected the quality system issues identified
in the corporate warning letter. The Company is continuing to work with the FDA to resolve all
remaining issues and obtain formal closure of the corporate warning letter.
While the Company continues to believe it has substantially remediated the issues raised in
the corporate warning letter through the corrective actions taken to date, the corporate warning
letter remains in place pending final resolution of all outstanding issues, which the Company is
actively working with the FDA to resolve. If the Companys remedial actions are not satisfactory
to the FDA, the Company may have to devote additional financial and human resources to its efforts,
and the FDA may take further regulatory actions against the Company.
In addition, we are a party to various lawsuits and claims arising in the normal course of
business. These lawsuits and claims include actions involving product liability, intellectual
property, employment and environmental matters. Based on information currently available, advice of
counsel, established reserves and other resources, we do not believe that any such actions are
likely to be, individually or in the aggregate, material to our business, financial condition,
results of operations or liquidity. However, in the event of unexpected further developments, it is
possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, or other similar matters, if unfavorable,
may be materially adverse to our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The Company updated and amended its risk factors in connection with the public offering of the
Convertible Notes. The risk factors, as so revised, were included on pages S-11 to S-26, S-28, S-29
and S-32 to S-34 of the Prospectus Supplement, dated August 3, 2010 (to the Prospectus dated August
2, 2010) relating to the Convertible Notes. Those risk factors have been filed as Exhibit 99.1 to
this report, and are incorporated hereby by reference.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable.
34
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:
Exhibit No. | Description | |||||
31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. |
||||
31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. |
||||
32.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. |
||||
32.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to
Rule 13a14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. |
||||
99.1 | | Pages S-11 to S-26, S-28, S-29 and S-32 to S-34 of
the Prospectus Supplement, dated August 3, 2010 (to
the Prospectus dated August 2, 2010) relating to the
public offering of the Companys 3.875% Convertible
Senior Subordinated Notes due 2017, which pages are
incorporated by reference in Part II, Item 1A of this
report. |
||||
101.1 | | The following materials from the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
26, 2010, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business
Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Income for the three and nine months
ended September 26, 2010 and September 27, 2009; (ii)
the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
September 26, 2010 and September 27, 2009; (iii) the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for
the nine months ended September 26, 2010 and
September 27, 2009; (iv) the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Equity for the nine months
ended September 26, 2010 and September 27, 2009; and
(v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements, tagged as blocks of text. |
35
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED |
||||
By: | /s/ Jeffrey P. Black | |||
Jeffrey P. Black | ||||
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
||||
By: | /s/ Richard A. Meier | |||
Richard A. Meier | ||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
||||
By: | /s/ Charles E. Williams | |||
Charles E. Williams | ||||
Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
Dated: October 27, 2010
36