TELEFLEX INC - Quarter Report: 2010 March (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 28, 2010
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number 1-5353
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 23-1147939 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. employer identification no.) | |
incorporation or organization) |
155 South Limerick Road, Limerick, Pennsylvania (Address of principal executive offices) |
19468 (Zip Code) |
(610) 948-5100
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(None)
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year,
If Changed Since Last Report)
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year,
If Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filler, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act). Yes o No þ
On April 16, 2010, 39,913,203 shares of the registrants common stock, $1.00 par value, were
outstanding.
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 28, 2010
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 28, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||||||
2 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
17 | ||||||||
24 | ||||||||
24 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.2 |
1
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 28, | March 29, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars and shares in thousands, | ||||||||
except per share) | ||||||||
Net revenues |
$ | 436,460 | $ | 440,068 | ||||
Materials, labor and other product
costs |
238,867 | 251,614 | ||||||
Gross profit |
197,593 | 188,454 | ||||||
Selling, engineering and administrative
expenses |
117,388 | 117,133 | ||||||
Research and development expenses |
9,560 | 7,565 | ||||||
Net loss on sales of businesses and
assets |
| 2,597 | ||||||
Restructuring and other impairment
charges |
463 | 2,463 | ||||||
Income from continuing operations before interest and
taxes |
70,182 | 58,696 | ||||||
Interest expense |
19,034 | 25,397 | ||||||
Interest income |
(218 | ) | (209 | ) | ||||
Income from continuing operations before
taxes |
51,366 | 33,508 | ||||||
Taxes on income from continuing
operations |
15,433 | 8,912 | ||||||
Income from continuing
operations |
35,933 | 24,596 | ||||||
Operating income from discontinued operations
(including gain on disposal of $9,737 and $275,787,
respectively) |
9,681 | 301,579 | ||||||
Taxes on income from discontinued
operations |
7,656 | 100,568 | ||||||
Income from discontinued
operations |
2,025 | 201,011 | ||||||
Net income |
37,958 | 225,607 | ||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling
interest |
286 | 236 | ||||||
Income from discontinued operations
attributable to noncontrolling interest |
| 9,860 | ||||||
Net income attributable to common
shareholders |
$ | 37,672 | $ | 215,511 | ||||
Earnings per share available to common shareholders: |
||||||||
Basic: |
||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 0.90 | $ | 0.61 | ||||
Income from discontinued operations |
$ | 0.05 | $ | 4.82 | ||||
Net income |
$ | 0.95 | $ | 5.43 | ||||
Diluted: |
||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 0.89 | $ | 0.61 | ||||
Income from discontinued operations |
$ | 0.05 | $ | 4.79 | ||||
Net income |
$ | 0.94 | $ | 5.40 | ||||
Dividends per share |
$ | 0.34 | $ | 0.34 | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic |
39,791 | 39,692 | ||||||
Diluted |
40,199 | 39,876 | ||||||
Amounts attributable to common shareholders: |
||||||||
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
$ | 35,647 | $ | 24,360 | ||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
2,025 | 191,151 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 37,672 | $ | 215,511 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
March 28, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash
equivalents |
$ | 210,719 | $ | 188,305 | ||||
Accounts receivable,
net |
297,445 | 265,305 | ||||||
Inventories,
net |
353,775 | 360,843 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets |
25,858 | 21,872 | ||||||
Income taxes
receivable |
34,643 | 100,733 | ||||||
Deferred tax
assets |
58,306 | 58,010 | ||||||
Assets held for
sale |
8,521 | 8,866 | ||||||
Total current
assets |
989,267 | 1,003,934 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment,
net |
305,525 | 317,499 | ||||||
Goodwill |
1,439,709 | 1,459,441 | ||||||
Intangibles and other assets,
net |
1,025,857 | 1,045,706 | ||||||
Investments in
affiliates |
13,901 | 12,089 | ||||||
Deferred tax
assets |
| 336 | ||||||
Total
assets |
$ | 3,774,259 | $ | 3,839,005 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||
Current
borrowings |
$ | 41,460 | $ | 4,008 | ||||
Accounts
payable |
86,354 | 94,983 | ||||||
Accrued
expenses |
82,023 | 97,274 | ||||||
Payroll and benefit-related
liabilities |
62,726 | 70,537 | ||||||
Derivative
liabilities |
15,896 | 16,709 | ||||||
Accrued
interest |
18,611 | 22,901 | ||||||
Income taxes
payable |
12,940 | 30,695 | ||||||
Deferred tax
liabilities |
3,355 | | ||||||
Total current
liabilities |
323,365 | 337,107 | ||||||
Long-term
borrowings |
1,141,280 | 1,192,491 | ||||||
Deferred tax
liabilities |
401,341 | 398,923 | ||||||
Pension and postretirement benefit
liabilities |
164,215 | 164,726 | ||||||
Other
liabilities |
156,436 | 160,684 | ||||||
Total
liabilities |
2,186,637 | 2,253,931 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Total common shareholders
equity |
1,582,821 | 1,580,241 | ||||||
Noncontrolling
interest |
4,801 | 4,833 | ||||||
Total
equity |
1,587,622 | 1,585,074 | ||||||
Total liabilities and
equity |
$ | 3,774,259 | $ | 3,839,005 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 28, 2010 | March 29, 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities of Continuing Operations: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 37,958 | $ | 225,607 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities: |
||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
(2,025 | ) | (201,011 | ) | ||||
Depreciation expense |
12,420 | 13,771 | ||||||
Amortization expense of intangible assets |
11,103 | 10,918 | ||||||
Amortization expense of deferred financing costs |
945 | 2,641 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
1,853 | 2,151 | ||||||
Net loss on sales of businesses and assets |
| 2,597 | ||||||
Other |
554 | 717 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and
disposals: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(48,210 | ) | (16,170 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
(1,240 | ) | (11,004 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(2,654 | ) | 1,830 | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(28,841 | ) | (34,089 | ) | ||||
Income taxes receivable and payable, net and deferred income taxes |
50,337 | (5,599 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from continuing operations |
32,200 | (7,641 | ) | |||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities of Continuing Operations: |
||||||||
Proceeds from long-term borrowings |
| 10,000 | ||||||
Reduction in long-term borrowings |
(51,090 | ) | (249,178 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in notes payable and current borrowings |
39,700 | (659 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from stock compensation plans |
3,670 | 367 | ||||||
Payments to noncontrolling interest shareholders |
| (295 | ) | |||||
Dividends |
(13,536 | ) | (13,511 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities from continuing operations |
(21,256 | ) | (253,276 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities of Continuing Operations: |
||||||||
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment |
(7,159 | ) | (6,525 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of businesses and assets, net of cash sold |
24,750 | 296,883 | ||||||
Payments for businesses and intangibles acquired, net of cash acquired |
(81 | ) | (1,108 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by investing activities from continuing
operations |
17,510 | 289,250 | ||||||
Cash Flows from Discontinued Operations: |
||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
(1,137 | ) | 20,370 | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
| (11,075 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(189 | ) | (1,598 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used in) provided by discontinued operations |
(1,326 | ) | 7,697 | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
(4,714 | ) | (254 | ) | ||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
22,414 | 35,776 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period |
188,305 | 107,275 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period |
$ | 210,719 | $ | 143,051 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(Unaudited)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | Treasury | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Paid in | Retained | Comprehensive | Stock | Noncontrolling | Total | Comprehensive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Dollars | Capital | Earnings | Income | Shares | Dollars | Interest | Equity | Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
41,995 | $ | 41,995 | $ | 268,263 | $ | 1,182,906 | $ | (108,202 | ) | 2,311 | $ | (138,507 | ) | $ | 39,428 | $ | 1,285,883 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
215,511 | 10,096 | 225,607 | $ | 225,607 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends ($0.34 per share) |
(13,511 | ) | (13,511 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial instruments marked to market, net of tax of $1,541 |
4,781 | 4,781 | 4,781 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustment (CTA)
|
(46,344 | ) | (99 | ) | (46,443 | ) | (46,443 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification of CTA to gain |
(9,365 | ) | (9,365 | ) | (9,365 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension liability adjustment, net of tax of $498 |
1,061 | 1,061 | 1,061 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interest shareholders |
(295 | ) | (295 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disposition of noncontrolling interest |
(45,019 | ) | (45,019 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 175,641 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued under compensation plans
|
10 | 10 | 1,596 | (12 | ) | 792 | 2,398 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation |
(9 | ) | 343 | 343 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 29, 2009 |
42,005 | $ | 42,005 | $ | 269,859 | $ | 1,384,906 | $ | (158,069 | ) | 2,290 | $ | (137,372 | ) | $ | 4,111 | $ | 1,405,440 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
42,033 | $ | 42,033 | $ | 277,050 | $ | 1,431,878 | $ | (34,120 | ) | 2,278 | $ | (136,600 | ) | $ | 4,833 | $ | 1,585,074 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
37,672 | 286 | 37,958 | $ | 37,958 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends ($0.34 per share) |
(13,536 | ) | (13,536 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial instruments marked to market, net of tax of $462
|
835 | 835 | 835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
(29,638 | ) | 47 | (29,591 | ) | (29,591 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension liability adjustment, net of tax of $448 |
1,309 | 1,309 | 1,309 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deconsolidation of VIE |
253 | (365 | ) | (112 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 10,511 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued under compensation plans
|
81 | 81 | 4,969 | (7 | ) | 395 | 5,445 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation |
(6 | ) | 240 | 240 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 28, 2010 |
42,114 | $ | 42,114 | $ | 282,019 | $ | 1,456,267 | $ | (61,614 | ) | 2,265 | $ | (135,965 | ) | $ | 4,801 | $ | 1,587,622 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Basis of presentation
We prepared the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Teleflex
Incorporated on the same basis as our annual consolidated financial statements, with the exception
of changes resulting from the adoption of new accounting guidance during the first three months of
2010 as described in Note 2 below.
In the opinion of management, our financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are of a
normal recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of financial statements for interim
periods in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and with Rule 10-01
of SEC Regulation S-X, which sets forth the instructions for financial statements included in Form
10-Q. The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial
statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
In accordance with applicable accounting standards, the accompanying condensed consolidated
financial statements do not include all of the information and footnote disclosures that are
required to be included in our annual consolidated financial statements. The year-end condensed
balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but, as permitted by Rule 10-01
of SEC Regulation S-X does not include all disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial
statements. Accordingly, our quarterly condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009.
As used in this report, the terms we, us, our, Teleflex and the Company mean
Teleflex Incorporated and its subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise. The results of
operations for the periods reported are not necessarily indicative of those that may be expected
for a full year.
Note 2 New accounting standards
The Company adopted the following amendments to accounting standards as of January 1, 2010,
the first day of its 2010 fiscal year:
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment to Transfers and Servicing:
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance to improve
the information that is reported in financial statements about the transfer of financial
assets and the effects of transfers of financial assets on financial position, financial
performance and cash flows and a transferors continuing involvement, if any, with
transferred financial assets. In addition, the guidance limits the circumstances in which a financial asset or a portion
of a financial asset should be derecognized in the financial statements being presented when
the transferor has not transferred the entire original financial asset. Upon the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter
of 2010, the $39.7 million of trade receivables under the Companys accounts receivable
securitization program (the Securitization Program) that were previously treated as sold
and removed from the balance sheet are now included in accounts receivable, net, and the
amounts outstanding under the Securitization Program are accounted for as a secured borrowing
and reflected as short-term debt on the Companys balance sheet (which as of March 28, 2010
is $39.7 million.) In addition, while there has been no change in the arrangement under the
Securitization Program, the adoption of this amendment reduced cash flow from operations by
approximately $39.7 million and resulted in a corresponding increase in cash flow from
financing activities.
Amendment to Consolidation: In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance that requires an
enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprises variable interest or
interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity (which would
result in the enterprise being deemed the primary beneficiary of that entity and, therefore,
obligated to consolidate the variable interest entity in its financial statements); to
require ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a
variable interest entity; to revise guidance for determining whether an entity is a variable
interest entity; and to require enhanced disclosures that will provide more transparent
information about an enterprises involvement with a variable
interest entity whose revenue was approximately $10 million
during 2009. As a result of
the adoption of this guidance, the Company deconsolidated a variable interest entity. Refer
to the Companys condensed consolidated statements of changes in equity for the impact of the
deconsolidation.
6
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Amendment to Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures: In January 2010, the FASB enhanced
and clarified disclosure requirements regarding fair value of financial instruments for
interim and annual reporting periods. The guidance requires additional disclosure for
transfer activity pertaining to Level 1 and 2 fair value measurements and purchase, sale,
issuance, and settlement activity for Level 3 fair value measurements. Additionally, the
FASB clarified disclosure requirements related to level of disaggregation, inputs and
valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The guidance is effective for interim and
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures
related to Level 3 fair value measurement activity which is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2010.
The Company will adopt the following new accounting standards as of January 1, 2011, the first
day of its 2011 fiscal year:
Amendment to Software: In October 2009, the FASB changed the accounting model for
revenue arrangements for certain tangible products containing software components and
nonsoftware components. The guidance provides direction on how to determine which software,
if any, relating to the tangible product is excluded from the scope of the software revenue
guidance. The amendment will be effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning on or
after June 15, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance to determine the
impact on the Companys results of operations, cash flows, and financial position.
Amendment to Revenue Recognition: In October 2009, the FASB established the criteria for
multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements by establishing new guidance on how to separate
deliverables and how to measure and allocate arrangement consideration to one or more units
of accounting. Additionally, this requires vendors to expand their disclosures around
multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements and will be effective prospectively for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June
15, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the guidance to determine the impact on the
Companys results of operations, cash flows, and financial position.
Note 3 Integration
Integration of Arrow
In connection with the acquisition of Arrow International, Inc. (Arrow) in October 2007, the
Company formulated a plan related to the integration of Arrow and the Companys Medical businesses.
The integration plan focuses on the closure of Arrow corporate functions and the consolidation of
manufacturing, sales, marketing and distribution functions in North America, Europe and Asia. The
Company finalized its estimate of the costs to implement the plan in the fourth quarter of 2008.
The Company has accrued estimates for certain costs, related primarily to personnel reductions and
facility closures and the termination of certain distribution agreements, at the date of
acquisition.
The following table provides information relating to changes in the accrued liability
associated with the Arrow integration plan during the three months ended March 28, 2010:
Balance at | Balance at | |||||||||||
December 31, | March 28, | |||||||||||
2009 | Payments | 2010 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||
Termination benefits |
$ | 0.4 | $ | | $ | 0.4 | ||||||
Facility closure costs |
0.5 | (0.1 | ) | 0.4 | ||||||||
Contract termination costs |
2.7 | | 2.7 | |||||||||
$ | 3.6 | $ | (0.1 | ) | $ | 3.5 | ||||||
Contract termination costs represent the termination of a European distributor agreement that
is currently in litigation but is expected to be paid in 2010.
In conjunction with the plan for the integration of Arrow and the Companys Medical
businesses, the Company has taken actions that affect employees and facilities of Teleflex. This
aspect of the integration plan is explained in Note 4, Restructuring and other impairment
charges. Costs that affect employees and facilities of Teleflex are charged to earnings and
included in restructuring and other impairment charges within the condensed consolidated statement
of operations for the periods in which the costs are incurred.
7
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 4 Restructuring and other impairment charges
The amounts included in restructuring and other impairment charges in the condensed
consolidated statement of income for the three months ended March 28, 2010 and March 29, 2009
consisted of the following:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 28, | March 29, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
2008 Commercial Segment program |
$ | | $ | 1,138 | ||||
2007 Arrow integration program |
463 | 1,325 | ||||||
Restructuring and other impairment charges |
$ | 463 | $ | 2,463 | ||||
2008 Commercial Segment Restructuring Program
In December 2008, the Company began certain restructuring initiatives with respect to the
Companys Commercial Segment. The initiatives involved the consolidation of operations and a
related reduction in workforce at certain of the Companys facilities in North America and Europe.
The Company determined to undertake these initiatives as a means to improve operating performance
and to better leverage its resources due to weakness in the marine and industrial markets.
By December 31, 2009, the Company had completed the 2008 Commercial Segment restructuring
program, and all costs associated with the program were fully paid during 2009. No changes were
recorded under this program in 2010.
The charges associated with the 2008 Commercial Segment restructuring program that were
included in restructuring and other impairment charges in the condensed consolidated statements of
income during the three months ended March 29, 2009 were as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||
March 29, 2009 | ||||
Commercial | ||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||
Termination benefits |
$ | 1,138 | ||
$ | 1,138 | |||
Termination benefits were comprised of severance-related payments for all employees
terminated in connection with the restructuring program.
2007 Arrow Integration Program
The charges associated with the 2007 Arrow integration program that were included in
restructuring and other impairment charges for the three months ended March 28, 2010 and March 29,
2009, are as follows:
Medical | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 28, 2010 | March 29, 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Termination benefits |
$ | 230 | $ | 1,097 | ||||
Facility closure costs |
425 | 51 | ||||||
Contract termination costs |
(195 | ) | 62 | |||||
Other restructuring costs |
3 | 115 | ||||||
$ | 463 | $ | 1,325 | |||||
8
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
At March 28, 2010, the accrued liability associated with the 2007 Arrow integration program
consisted of the following:
Balance at | Balance at | |||||||||||||||||||
December 31, | Subsequent | March 28, | ||||||||||||||||||
2009 | Accruals | Payments | Translation | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Termination benefits |
$ | 2,183 | $ | 230 | $ | (1,194 | ) | $ | (64 | ) | $ | 1,155 | ||||||||
Facility closure costs |
302 | 425 | (642 | ) | (15 | ) | 70 | |||||||||||||
Contract termination costs |
687 | (195 | ) | | (13 | ) | 479 | |||||||||||||
Other restructuring costs |
23 | 3 | (3 | ) | (1 | ) | 22 | |||||||||||||
$ | 3,195 | $ | 463 | $ | (1,839 | ) | $ | (93 | ) | $ | 1,726 | |||||||||
Termination benefits are comprised of severance-related payments for all employees terminated
in connection with the 2007 Arrow integration program. Facility closure costs relate primarily to
costs to prepare a facility for closure. Contract termination costs relate primarily to the
termination of a European distributor agreement and leases in conjunction with the consolidation of
facilities.
As of March 28, 2010, the Company expects to incur the following restructuring expenses
associated with the 2007 Arrow integration program in its Medical Segment through December 2010:
(Dollars in millions) | ||||
Termination benefits |
$ | 0.8 1.1 | ||
Facility closure costs |
0.5 0.7 | |||
Contract termination costs |
0.2 0.5 | |||
Other restructuring costs |
0.1 0.2 | |||
$ | 1.6 2.5 | |||
Note 5 Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following:
March 28, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Raw
materials |
$ | 145,735 | $ | 150,508 | ||||
Work-in-process |
60,699 | 53,847 | ||||||
Finished goods |
181,607 | 191,747 | ||||||
388,041 | 396,102 | |||||||
Less: Inventory
reserve |
(34,266 | ) | (35,259 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
$ | 353,775 | $ | 360,843 | ||||
Note 6Goodwill and other intangible assets
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, by operating segment, for the three months ended
March 28, 2010 are as follows:
Medical | Commercial | Total | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||||
Goodwill |
$ | 1,444,354 | $ | 15,087 | $ | 1,459,441 | ||||||
Accumulated impairment losses |
| | | |||||||||
1,444,354 | 15,087 | 1,459,441 | ||||||||||
Goodwill related to dispositions |
(9,224 | ) | | (9,224 | ) | |||||||
Translation adjustment |
(10,508 | ) | | (10,508 | ) | |||||||
Balance as of March 28, 2010 |
||||||||||||
Goodwill |
1,424,622 | 15,087 | 1,439,709 | |||||||||
Accumulated impairment losses |
| | | |||||||||
$ | 1,424,622 | $ | 15,087 | $ | 1,439,709 | |||||||
9
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Intangible assets consisted of the following:
Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization | |||||||||||||||
March 28, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | March 28, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Customer
lists |
$ | 555,792 | $ | 559,207 | $ | 79,960 | $ | 74,047 | ||||||||
Intellectual
property |
207,021 | 208,247 | 63,853 | 59,824 | ||||||||||||
Distribution
rights |
21,694 | 22,094 | 16,972 | 17,066 | ||||||||||||
Trade
names |
334,502 | 336,673 | 3,828 | 3,708 | ||||||||||||
$ | 1,119,009 | $ | 1,126,221 | $ | 164,613 | $ | 154,645 | |||||||||
Amortization expense related to intangible assets was approximately $11.1 million and $10.9
million for the three months ended March 28, 2010 and March 29, 2009, respectively. Estimated
annual amortization expense for each of the five succeeding years is as follows (dollars in
thousands):
2010 |
$ | 44,600 | ||
2011 |
44,400 | |||
2012 |
44,200 | |||
2013 |
43,200 | |||
2014 |
40,300 |
Note 7 Financial instruments
The Company uses derivative instruments for risk management purposes. Forward rate contracts
are used to manage foreign currency transaction exposure and interest rate swaps are used to reduce
exposure to interest rate changes. These derivative instruments are designated as cash flow hedges
and are recorded on the balance sheet at fair market value. The effective portion of the gains or
losses on derivatives are reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified
into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings.
Gains and losses on the derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components
excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings. See Note 8, Fair
Value Measurement for additional information.
The location and fair values of derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments in
the condensed consolidated balance sheet are as follows:
March 28, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Fair Value | Fair Value | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Asset derivatives: |
||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts: |
||||||||
Other assets
current |
$ | 2,979 | $ | 1,356 | ||||
Total asset derivatives |
$ | 2,979 | $ | 1,356 | ||||
Liability derivatives: |
||||||||
Interest rate contracts: |
||||||||
Derivative liabilities
current |
$ | 15,499 | $ | 15,848 | ||||
Other
liabilities
noncurrent |
13,145 | 12,258 | ||||||
Foreign exchange contracts: |
||||||||
Derivative liabilities
current |
397 | 860 | ||||||
Total liability derivatives |
$ | 29,041 | $ | 28,966 | ||||
10
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The location and amount of the gains and losses for derivatives in cash flow hedging
relationships that were reported in other comprehensive income (OCI), accumulated other
comprehensive income (AOCI) and the condensed consolidated statement of income for the three
months ended March 28, 2010 and March 29, 2009 are as follows:
After Tax Gain/(Loss) | ||||||||
Recognized in OCI | ||||||||
March 28, | March 29, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Interest rate
contracts |
$ | (312 | ) | $ | 3,098 | |||
Foreign exchange
contracts |
1,147 | 1,683 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 835 | $ | 4,781 | ||||
Pre-Tax (Gain)/Loss Reclassified | ||||||||
from AOCI into Income | ||||||||
March 28, | March 29, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Interest rate contracts: |
||||||||
Interest
expense |
$ | 4,580 | $ | 4,357 | ||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
||||||||
Net
revenues |
(11 | ) | 799 | |||||
Materials, labor and other product
costs |
(735 | ) | 1,616 | |||||
Income from discontinued
operations |
| 337 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 3,834 | $ | 7,109 | ||||
For the three months ended March 28, 2010 and March 29, 2009, there was no ineffectiveness
related to the Companys derivatives.
Note 8 Fair value measurement
The following tables provide the financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value
measured on a recurring basis as of March 28, 2010 and March 29, 2009:
Significant | ||||||||||||||||
Total carrying | Quoted prices in | Significant other | unobservable | |||||||||||||
value at | active markets | observable inputs | inputs | |||||||||||||
March 28, 2010 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 10,000 | $ | 10,000 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Deferred compensation assets |
$ | 3,338 | $ | 3,338 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Derivative assets |
$ | 2,979 | $ | | $ | 2,979 | $ | | ||||||||
Derivative liabilities |
$ | 29,041 | $ | | $ | 29,041 | $ | |
Significant | ||||||||||||||||
Total carrying | Quoted prices in | Significant other | unobservable | |||||||||||||
value at | active markets | observable inputs | inputs | |||||||||||||
March 29, 2009 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 30,000 | $ | 30,000 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Deferred compensation assets |
$ | 2,233 | $ | 2,233 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Derivative assets |
$ | 992 | $ | | $ | 992 | $ | | ||||||||
Derivative liabilities |
$ | 48,376 | $ | | $ | 48,376 | $ | |
The carrying amount reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 28, 2010
for long-term debt is $1,141.3 million. Using a discounted cash flow technique that incorporates a
market interest yield curve with adjustments for duration, optionality, and risk profile, the
Company has determined the fair value of its debt to be $1,116.6 million at March 28, 2010. The
Companys implied credit rating is a factor in determining the market interest yield curve.
11
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Valuation Techniques
The Companys cash and cash equivalents valued based upon Level 1 inputs are comprised of
overnight investments in money market funds. The funds invest in obligations of the U.S. Treasury,
including Treasury bills, bonds and notes. The funds seek to maintain a net asset value of $1.00
per share.
The Companys financial assets valued based upon Level 1 inputs are comprised of
investments in marketable securities held in Rabbi Trusts which are used to pay benefits under
certain deferred compensation plan benefits. Under these deferred compensation plans, participants
designate investment options to serve as the basis for measurement of the notional value of their
accounts. The investment assets of the rabbi trust are valued using quoted market prices multiplied
by the number of shares held in the trust.
The Companys financial assets valued based upon Level 2 inputs are comprised of foreign
currency forward contracts. The Companys financial liabilities valued based upon Level 2 inputs
are comprised of an interest rate swap contract and foreign currency forward contracts. The Company
has taken into account the creditworthiness of the counterparties in measuring fair value. The
Company uses forward rate contracts to manage currency transaction exposure and interest rate swaps
to manage exposure to interest rate changes. The fair value of the interest rate swap contract is
developed from market-based inputs under the income approach using cash flows discounted at
relevant market interest rates. The fair value of the foreign currency forward exchange contracts
represents the amount required to enter into offsetting contracts with similar remaining maturities
based on quoted market prices. See Note 7, Financial Instruments for additional information.
Note 9 Changes in shareholders equity
On June 14, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $300
million of outstanding Company common stock. Repurchases of Company stock under the Board
authorization may be made from time to time in the open market and may include privately-negotiated
transactions as market conditions warrant and subject to regulatory considerations. The stock
repurchase program has no expiration date and the Companys ability to execute on the program will
depend on, among other factors, cash requirements for acquisitions, cash generation from
operations, debt repayment obligations, market conditions and regulatory requirements. In
addition, the Companys senior loan agreements limit the aggregate amount of share repurchases and
other restricted payments the Company may make to $75 million per year in the event the Companys
consolidated leverage ratio exceeds 3.5 to 1. Accordingly, these provisions may limit the
Companys ability to repurchase shares under this Board authorization. Through March 28, 2010, no
shares have been purchased under this Board authorization.
A reconciliation of basic to diluted weighted average shares outstanding is as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 28, | March 29, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Shares in thousands) | ||||||||
Basic |
39,791 | 39,692 | ||||||
Dilutive shares assumed
issued |
408 | 184 | ||||||
Diluted |
40,199 | 39,876 | ||||||
Weighted average stock options that were antidilutive and therefore not included in the
calculation of earnings per share were approximately 738 thousand and 1,483 thousand for the three
months ended March 28, 2010 and March 29, 2009, respectively.
Note 10 Stock compensation plans
The Company has two stock-based compensation plans under which equity-based awards may be
made. The Companys 2000 Stock Compensation Plan (the 2000 plan) provides for the granting of
incentive and non-qualified stock options and restricted stock awards to directors, officers and
key employees. Under the 2000 plan, the Company is authorized to issue up to 4 million shares of
common stock, but no more than 800,000 of those shares may be issued as restricted stock. Options
granted under the 2000 plan have an exercise price equal to the average of the high and low sales
prices of the Companys common stock on the date of the grant, rounded to the nearest $0.25.
Generally, options granted under the 2000 plan are exercisable three to five years after the date
of the grant and expire no more than ten years after the grant date. Restricted stock awards
generally vest in one to three years. During the first three months of 2010, the Company granted
restricted stock awards representing 148,287 shares of common stock under the 2000 plan. The
unrecognized compensation for these awards as of the grant date was $8.5 million, which will be
recognized over the vesting period of the award.
12
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Companys 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2008 plan) provides for the granting of various
types of equity-based awards to directors, officers and key employees. These awards include
incentive and non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards and other
stock-based awards. Under the 2008 plan, the Company is authorized to issue up to 2.5 million
shares of common stock, but grants of awards other than stock options and stock appreciation rights
may not exceed 875,000 shares. Options granted under the 2008 plan have an exercise price equal to
the closing price of the Companys common stock on the date of grant. Generally, options granted
under the 2008 plan are exercisable three years after the date of the grant and expire no more than
ten years after the grant date. During the first three months of 2010, the Company granted
incentive and non-qualified options to purchase 586,642 shares of common stock under the 2008 plan.
The unrecognized compensation for these awards as of the grant date was $7.2 million, which will be
recognized over the vesting period of the award.
Note 11 Pension and other postretirement benefits
The Company has a number of defined benefit pension and postretirement plans covering eligible
U.S. and non-U.S. employees. The defined benefit pension plans are noncontributory. The benefits
under these plans are based primarily on years of service and employees pay near retirement. The
Companys funding policy for U.S. plans is to contribute annually, at a minimum, amounts required
by applicable laws and regulations. Obligations under non-U.S. plans are systematically provided
for by depositing funds with trustees or by book reserves.
In 2009, the Company offered certain qualifying individuals an early retirement program. Based
on the individuals that accepted the offer the Company recognized special termination benefits of
$402 thousand in pension expense and $395 thousand in postretirement expense in the second quarter
of 2009.
The Company and certain of its subsidiaries provide medical, dental and life insurance
benefits to pensioners and survivors. The associated plans are unfunded and approved claims are
paid from Company funds.
Net benefit cost of pension and postretirement benefit plans consisted of the following:
Pension | Other Benefits | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
March 28, | March 29, | March 28, | March 29, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Service
cost |
$ | 720 | $ | 915 | $ | 235 | $ | 284 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
4,678 | 4,150 | 770 | 900 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan
assets |
(4,366 | ) | (3,538 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Net amortization and
deferral |
1,085 | 1,235 | 214 | 220 | ||||||||||||
Settlement gain |
(35 | ) | | | | |||||||||||
Net benefit
cost |
$ | 2,082 | $ | 2,762 | $ | 1,219 | $ | 1,404 | ||||||||
Note 12 Commitments and contingent liabilities
Product warranty liability: The Company warrants to the original purchaser of certain of its
products that it will, at its option, repair or replace, without charge, such products if they fail
due to a manufacturing defect. Warranty periods vary by product. The Company has recourse
provisions for certain products that would enable recovery from third parties for amounts paid
under the warranty. The Company accrues for product warranties when, based on available
information, it is probable that customers will make claims under warranties relating to products
that have been sold, and a reasonable estimate of the costs (based on historical claims experience
relative to sales) can be made. Set forth below is a reconciliation of the Companys estimated
product warranty liability for the three months ended March 28, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
Balance December 31, 2009 |
$ | 12,085 | ||
Accruals for warranties issued in
2010 |
959 | |||
Settlements (cash and in
kind) |
(1,376 | ) | ||
Accruals related to pre-existing
warranties |
175 | |||
Effect of
translation |
(217 | ) | ||
Balance March 28, 2010 |
$ | 11,626 | ||
13
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Operating leases: The Company uses various leased facilities and equipment in its operations.
The terms for these leased assets vary depending on the lease agreement. In connection with these
operating leases, the Company had residual value guarantees in the amount of approximately $9.7
million at March 28, 2010. The Companys future payments under the operating leases cannot exceed
the minimum rent obligation plus the residual value guarantee amount. The residual value guarantee
amounts are based upon the unamortized lease values of the assets under lease, and are payable by
the Company if the Company declines to renew the leases or to exercise its purchase option with
respect to the leased assets. At March 28, 2010, the Company had no liabilities recorded for these
obligations. Any residual value guarantee amounts paid to the lessor may be recovered by the
Company from the sale of the assets to a third party.
Environmental: The Company is subject to contingencies as a result of environmental laws and
regulations that in the future may require the Company to take further action to correct the
effects on the environment of prior disposal practices or releases of chemical or petroleum
substances by the Company or other parties. Much of this liability results from the U.S.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), often referred to
as Superfund, the U.S. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and similar state laws.
These laws require the Company to undertake certain investigative and remedial activities at sites
where the Company conducts or once conducted operations or at sites where Company-generated waste
was disposed.
Remediation activities vary substantially in duration and cost from site to site. These
activities, and their associated costs, depend on the mix of unique site characteristics, evolving
remediation technologies, diverse regulatory agencies and enforcement policies, as well as the
presence or absence of other potentially responsible parties. At March 28, 2010, the Companys
condensed consolidated balance sheet included an accrued liability of approximately $8.3 million
relating to these matters. Considerable uncertainty exists with respect to these costs and, if
adverse changes in circumstances occur, potential liability may exceed the amount accrued as of
March 28, 2010. The time frame over which the accrued amounts may be paid out, based on past
history, is estimated to be 15-20 years.
Regulatory matters: On October 11, 2007, the Companys subsidiary, Arrow International,
Inc. (Arrow), received a corporate warning letter from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(FDA). The letter cites three site-specific warning letters issued by the FDA in 2005 and
subsequent inspections performed from June 2005 to February 2007 at Arrows facilities in the
United States. The letter expresses concerns with Arrows quality systems, including complaint
handling, corrective and preventive action, process and design validation, inspection and training
procedures. It also advises that Arrows corporate-wide program to evaluate, correct and prevent
quality system issues has been deficient. Limitations on pre-market approvals and certificates for
foreign governments had previously been imposed on Arrow based on prior inspections and the
corporate warning letter did not impose additional sanctions that are expected to have a material
financial impact on the Company.
In connection with its acquisition of Arrow, completed on October 1, 2007, the Company
developed an integration plan that included the commitment of significant resources to correct
these previously-identified regulatory issues and further improve overall quality systems. Senior
management officials from the Company have met with FDA representatives, and a comprehensive
written corrective action plan was presented to FDA in late 2007. At the end of 2009, the FDA began
its reinspections of the Arrow facilities covered by the corporate warning letter. These
inspections have been completed, and the FDA has issued certain written observations to Arrow as a
result of those inspections. Arrow has responded in writing to those observations and is
communicating with the FDA regarding resolution of all outstanding issues.
While the Company continues to believe it has substantially remediated the issues raised in
the corporate warning letter through the corrective actions taken to date, and that it has
responded thoroughly and comprehensively to each of the observations resulting from the recent
inspections, there can be no assurance that these matters have been resolved to the satisfaction of
the FDA. If the Companys remedial actions are not satisfactory to the FDA, the Company may have
to devote additional financial and human resources to its efforts, and the FDA may take further
regulatory actions against the Company.
Litigation: The Company is a party to various lawsuits and claims arising in the normal
course of business. These lawsuits and claims include actions involving product liability,
intellectual property, employment and environmental matters. Based on information currently
available, advice of counsel, established reserves and other resources, the Company does not
believe that any such actions are likely to be, individually or in the aggregate, material to its
business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. However, in the event of
unexpected further developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, or
other similar matters, if unfavorable, may be materially adverse to the Companys business,
financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Legal costs such as outside counsel fees
and expenses are charged to expense in the period incurred.
14
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Tax
Audit and Examinations:
In an April 12, 2010 notice to our subsidiary Arrow International CR, the taxing authority in the
Czech Republic has questioned the transfer pricing Arrow International CR utilized for certain
products sold during 2006. The notice requests additional information and states that if the tax
authority is not satisfied with our response, they intend to challenge certain tax incentives
received by Arrow International CR for the 2001-2006 years in their entirety. We have consulted
with external advisors and believe the transfer pricing policy of Arrow International CR met the
essential requirements of the tax incentive program. If the taxing authority were to ultimately
prevail in disallowing the entire tax incentive benefit, the cost, including penalties and
interest, would not have a material adverse effect on the Company. The tax incentive program expired in 2006 in
accordance with its intended term, therefore any loss of the tax incentives benefit would not
have an impact on current or future operations.
In addition, the Company and its subsidiaries are routinely subject to income tax examinations by various taxing
authorities. As of March 28, 2010, the most significant tax examinations in process are in the jurisdictions of the
United States, Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, and France. It is uncertain as to when these examinations may be
concluded and the ultimate outcome of such examinations. As a result of the uncertain outcome of these ongoing
examinations, future examinations, or the expiration of statutes of limitation for certain jurisdictions, it is
reasonably possible that the related unrecognized tax benefits for tax positions taken could materially change from
those recorded as liabilities at March 28, 2010. Due to the potential for resolution of certain foreign and U.S.
examinations, and the expiration of various statutes of limitation, it is reasonably possible that the Companys
unrecognized tax benefits may change within the next twelve months by a range of zero to $23 million.
Other: The Company has various purchase commitments for materials, supplies and items of
permanent investment incident to the ordinary conduct of business. On average, such commitments are
not at prices in excess of current market.
Note 13 Business segment information
Information about continuing operations by business segment is as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 28, | March 29, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Segment data: |
||||||||
Medical |
$ | 343,537 | $ | 334,785 | ||||
Aerospace |
36,873 | 43,729 | ||||||
Commercial |
56,050 | 61,554 | ||||||
Segment net revenues |
$ | 436,460 | $ | 440,068 | ||||
Medical |
$ | 73,498 | $ | 69,412 | ||||
Aerospace |
1,744 | 3,037 | ||||||
Commercial |
3,060 | 2,036 | ||||||
Segment operating profit |
78,302 | 74,485 | ||||||
Less: Corporate expenses |
7,943 | 10,965 | ||||||
Net loss on sales of businesses and assets |
| 2,597 | ||||||
Restructuring and impairment charges |
463 | 2,463 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
(286 | ) | (236 | ) | ||||
Income from continuing operations before interest and
taxes |
$ | 70,182 | $ | 58,696 | ||||
Note 14 Divestiture-related activities
When dispositions occur in the normal course of business, gains or losses on the sale of such
businesses or assets are recognized in the income statement line item Net loss on sales of
businesses and assets.
The following table provides the amount of Net loss on sales of businesses and assets for the
three months ended March 28, 2010 and March 29, 2009:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 28, | March 29, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Net loss on sales of businesses and assets |
$ | | $ | 2,597 |
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company realized a loss of $2.6 million on the sale of a
product line in its Marine business.
Assets Held for Sale
Assets held for sale at March 28, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consists of four buildings which
the Company is actively marketing.
15
Table of Contents
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Discontinued Operations
On March 2, 2010, the Company completed the sale of its SSI Surgical Services Inc. business
(SSI), a reporting unit within its Medical Segment, to a privately-owned multi-service line
healthcare company for approximately $25 million and realized a gain of $2.1 million, net of tax.
During the third quarter of 2009, the Company completed the sale of its Power Systems
operations to Fuel Systems Solutions, Inc. for $14.5 million and realized a loss of $3.3 million,
net of tax. During the second quarter, the Company recognized a non-cash goodwill impairment charge
of $25.1 million to adjust the carrying value of these operations to their estimated fair value.
In the third quarter of 2009, the Company reported the Power Systems operations, including the
goodwill impairment charge, in discontinued operations.
On March 20, 2009, the Company completed the sale of its 51 percent share of Airfoil
Technologies International Singapore Pte. Ltd. (ATI Singapore) to GE Pacific Private Limited
for $300 million in cash. ATI Singapore, which provides engine repair products and services for
critical components of flight turbines, was part of a joint venture between General Electric
Company (GE) and the Company. In December 2009, the Company completed the transfer of its
ownership interest in the remaining ATI business to GE.
The following table presents the operating results for the three months ended March 28, 2010
and March 29, 2009 of the operations that have been treated as discontinued operations:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 28, 2010 | March 29, 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Net revenues |
$ | 3,198 | $ | 97,328 | ||||
Costs and other expenses |
3,254 | 71,536 | ||||||
Gain on disposition |
(9,737 | ) | (275,787 | ) | ||||
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes |
9,681 | 301,579 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes |
7,656 | 100,568 | ||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
2,025 | 201,011 | ||||||
Less: Income from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interest |
| 9,860 | ||||||
Income from discontinued operations attributable to common shareholders |
$ | 2,025 | $ | 191,151 | ||||
Net assets and liabilities sold in 2010 in relation to the discontinued operations were
comprised of the following:
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||
Net assets |
$ | 18,403 | ||
Net liabilities |
3,147 | |||
$ | 15,256 | |||
16
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
All statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, other than statements of historical
fact, are forward-looking statements. The words anticipate, believe, estimate, expect,
intend, may, plan, will, would, should, guidance, potential, continue, project,
forecast, confident, prospects, and similar expressions typically are used to identify
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on the then-current expectations,
beliefs, assumptions, estimates and forecasts about our business and the industry and markets in
which we operate. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to
risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and
results may differ materially from what is expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements
due to a number of factors, including our ability to resolve, to the satisfaction of the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration (FDA), the issues identified in the corporate warning letter issued to
Arrow International; changes in business relationships with and purchases by or from major
customers or suppliers, including delays or cancellations in shipments; demand for and market
acceptance of new and existing products; our ability to integrate acquired businesses into our
operations, realize planned synergies and operate such businesses profitably in accordance with
expectations; our ability to effectively execute our restructuring programs; competitive market
conditions and resulting effects on revenues and pricing; increases in raw material costs that
cannot be recovered in product pricing; and global economic factors, including currency exchange
rates and interest rates; difficulties entering new markets; and general economic conditions. For
a further discussion of the risks relating to our business, see Item 1A of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. We expressly disclaim any obligation to
update these forward-looking statements, except as otherwise specifically stated by us or as
required by law or regulation.
Overview
Teleflex is principally a global provider of medical technology products that enable
healthcare providers to improve patient outcomes, reduce infections and enhance patient and
provider safety. We primarily develop, manufacture and supply single-use medical devices used by
hospitals and healthcare providers for common diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in critical
care and surgical applications. We serve hospitals and healthcare providers in more than 140
countries.
We provide a broad-based platform of medical products, which we categorize into four groups:
Critical Care, Surgical Care, Cardiac Care and OEM and Development Services. Critical care,
representing our largest product group, includes medical devices used in vascular access,
anesthesia, urology and respiratory care applications; surgical care includes surgical instruments
and devices; and cardiac care includes cardiac assist devices and equipment. We also design and
manufacture instruments and devices for other medical device manufacturers.
In addition to our medical business, we also have businesses that serve niche segments of the
aerospace and commercial markets with specialty engineered products. Our aerospace products include
cargo-handling systems, containers, and pallets for commercial air cargo, and military aircraft
actuators. Our commercial products include driver controls, engine assemblies and drive parts for
the marine industry and rigging products and services for commercial industries.
Over the past several years, we have engaged in an extensive acquisition and divestiture
program to improve margins, reduce cyclicality and focus our resources on the development of our
healthcare business. We have significantly changed the composition of our portfolio of businesses,
expanding our presence in the medical device industry, while divesting many of our businesses
serving the aerospace and industrial markets. The most significant of these transactions occurred
in 2007 with our acquisition of Arrow International, a leading global supplier of catheter-based
medical technology products used for vascular access and cardiac care, and the divestiture of our
automotive and industrial businesses. Our acquisition of Arrow significantly expanded our
disposable medical product offerings for critical care, enhanced our global footprint and added to
our research and development capabilities.
We continually evaluate the composition of the portfolio of our products and businesses to
ensure alignment with our overall objectives. We strive to maintain a portfolio of products and
businesses that provide consistency of performance, improved profitability and sustainable growth.
On
March 2, 2010, we completed the sale of our SSI Surgical Services Inc. business
(SSI), a reporting unit within our Medical Segment, to a privately-owned multi-service line healthcare
company for approximately $25 million. We realized a gain of $2.1 million, net of tax, on this
transaction.
During the third quarter of 2009, we completed the sale of our Power Systems operations to
Fuel Systems Solutions, Inc. for $14.5 million and realized a loss of $3.3 million, net of tax.
During the second quarter of 2009, we recognized a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $25.1
million to adjust the carrying value of the Power Systems operations to their estimated fair value.
17
Table of Contents
On March 20, 2009, we completed the sale of our 51 percent ownership interest in ATI Singapore
to GE Pacific Private Limited for $300 million in cash. ATI Singapore, which provides engine
repair products and services for critical components of flight
turbines, was part of a joint venture between General Electric Company (GE) and us. In
December 2009, we completed the transfer of our ownership interest in the remaining ATI business
(together with ATI Singapore, the ATI businesses) to GE for a nominal amount.
The Medical, Aerospace and Commercial segments comprised 79%, 8% and 13% of our revenues,
respectively, for the three months ended March 28, 2010 and comprised 76%, 10% and 14% of our
revenues, respectively, for the same period in 2009.
Health Care Reform
On March 23, 2010 the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was signed into law. This
legislation will have a significant impact on our business. For medical device companies such as
Teleflex, the expansion of medical insurance coverage should lead to greater utilization of the
products we manufacture, but this legislation also contains provisions designed to contain the cost
of healthcare, which could negatively affect pricing we receive from the sale of our products. In
addition, commencing in 2013, the legislation imposes a 2.3% excise tax on sales of medical
devices. As this new law is implemented over the next 2-3 years, we will be in a better position to
ascertain its impact on our business. We currently estimate the impact of the medical device excise
tax will be approximately $16 million annually, beginning in 2013. We also evaluated the change in
the tax regulations related to the Medicare Part D subsidy as currently outlined in the new
legislation and determined that it did not have a significant impact on our financial position or
results of operations.
Results of Operations
Discussion of growth from acquisitions reflects the impact of a purchased company for up to
twelve months beyond the date of acquisition. Activity beyond the initial twelve months is
considered core growth. Core growth excludes the impact of translating the results of international
subsidiaries at different currency exchange rates from year to year and the comparable activity of
divested companies within the most recent twelve-month period.
The following comparisons exclude the operations of SSI, Power Systems and the ATI businesses
which have been presented in our consolidated financial results as discontinued operations (see
Note 14 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report for discussion
of discontinued operations).
Revenues
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 28, 2010 | March 29, 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||
Net revenues |
$ | 436.5 | $ | 440.1 |
Net revenues for the first quarter of 2010 decreased approximately 1% to $436.5 million from
$440.1 million in the first quarter of 2009. Core revenues for the quarter declined 3%, offset by
foreign currency translation which favorably impacted sales 3%. The disposition of a product line
in the Commercial Segment during the first quarter of 2009 accounted for a 1% decline in revenues.
Core revenues were down in the Aerospace Segment (20%), due to softness in commercial aviation
markets and in the Commercial Segment (6%), as weak global economic conditions continue to
negatively impact the markets served by our rigging services products but the Marine market is
showing signs of recovery. Core revenues in the Medical Segment were unchanged from the first
quarter of 2009 as the negative impact from a voluntary recall of a product in our critical care
product group and lower sales of surgical products and orthopedic devices sold to medical original
equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, was offset by higher sales of other critical care products.
Gross profit
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 28, 2010 | March 29, 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 197.6 | $ | 188.5 | ||||
Percentage of sales |
45.3 | % | 42.8 | % |
18
Table of Contents
Gross profit as a percentage of revenues for the first quarter of 2010 increased to 45.3% from
42.8% in 2009. Gross profit as a percentage of revenues increased in the Medical and Commercial
segments, due mainly to lower raw material and manufacturing costs. Gross profit as a percentage
of revenues decreased in the Aerospace Segment due to lower sales volume of cargo containers and
a shift in sales mix away from higher margin wide body cargo system spare components and
repairs and towards lower margin single deck wide body cargo loading systems.
Selling, engineering and administrative
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 28, 2010 | March 29, 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||
Selling, engineering and administrative |
$ | 117.4 | $ | 117.1 | ||||
Percentage of sales |
26.9 | % | 26.6 | % |
Selling, engineering and administrative expenses (operating expenses) as a percentage of
revenues for the first quarter of 2010 increased to 26.9% from 26.6% in 2009. Foreign currency
movements increased selling, engineering and administrative expenses approximately $3 million
during the period, but was offset by a net $3 million reduction principally related to cost
reduction initiatives throughout the Company, including lower spending on remediation of FDA
regulatory issues.
Research
and development
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 28, 2010 | March 29, 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||
Research and development |
$ | 9.6 | $ | 7.6 | ||||
Percentage of sales |
2.2 | % | 1.7 | % |
Higher levels of research and development expenses reflect increased investments related to
antimicrobial technologies and the establishment of an innovation center in Malaysia.
Interest expense
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 28, 2010 | March 29, 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | 19.0 | $ | 25.4 | ||||
Average interest rate on debt |
5.7 | % | 5.7 | % |
Interest expense decreased in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period of 2009
due to a reduction of approximately $280 million in average outstanding debt.
Taxes on income from continuing operations
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 28, 2010 | March 29, 2009 | |||||||
Effective income tax rate |
30.0 | % | 26.6 | % |
The effective income tax rate for the three months ended March 28, 2010 was 30.0% compared to 26.6%
for the three months ended March 29, 2009. The increase in the effective tax rate is due to a
larger inclusion of foreign income taxable in the United States previously excluded under tax
regulations prior to 2010 and an increase in discrete tax charges in 2010 compared to 2009. These
increases were partly offset by a larger benefit from lower foreign taxes.
19
Table of Contents
Restructuring and other impairment charges
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 28, 2010 | March 29, 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||
2008 Commercial restructuring program |
$ | | $ | 1.2 | ||||
2007 Arrow integration program |
0.5 | 1.3 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 0.5 | $ | 2.5 | ||||
In December 2008, we began certain restructuring initiatives that affected the Commercial
Segment. These initiatives involved the consolidation of operations and a related reduction in
workforce at three of our facilities in Europe and North America. We determined to undertake these
initiatives to improve operating performance and to better leverage our existing resources in light
of expected weakness in the marine and industrial markets. By December 31, 2009, we had completed
the 2008 Commercial Segment restructuring program and all costs associated with the program were
fully paid during 2009. Therefore, no charges were recorded under this program in 2010. We expect
to realize annual pre-tax savings of between $3.5 $4.5 million in 2010 as a result of actions
taken in connection with this program.
In connection with the acquisition of Arrow in 2007, we formulated a plan related to the
integration of Arrow and our other Medical businesses. The integration plan focused on the closure
of Arrow corporate functions and the consolidation of manufacturing, sales, marketing and
distribution functions in North America, Europe and Asia. Costs related to actions that affected
employees and facilities of Arrow have been included in the allocation of the purchase price of
Arrow. Costs related to actions that affected employees and facilities of Teleflex are charged to
earnings and included in restructuring and impairment charges within the condensed consolidated
statement of operations. These costs amounted to approximately $0.5 million during the three months
ended March 28, 2010. As of March 28, 2010, we estimate that, for the remainder of 2010, the
aggregate of future restructuring and impairment charges that we will incur in connection with the
Arrow integration plan are approximately $1.6 $2.5 million. Of this amount, $0.8 $1.1 million
relates to employee termination costs, $0.5 $0.7 million relates to facility closure costs, $0.2
- $0.5 million relates to contract termination costs associated with the termination of leases and
certain distribution agreements and $0.1 $0.2 million relates to other restructuring costs. We
expect to have realized aggregate annual pre-tax savings of between $70 $75 million after these
integration and restructuring actions are complete.
For additional information regarding our restructuring programs, see Note 4 to our condensed
consolidated financial statements included in this report.
Segment Reviews
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
% Increase/ | ||||||||||||
March 28, 2010 | March 29, 2009 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||
Medical |
$ | 343.5 | $ | 334.8 | 3 | |||||||
Aerospace |
36.9 | 43.7 | (16 | ) | ||||||||
Commercial |
56.1 | 61.6 | (9 | ) | ||||||||
Segment net revenues |
$ | 436.5 | $ | 440.1 | (1 | ) | ||||||
Medical |
$ | 73.5 | $ | 69.4 | 6 | |||||||
Aerospace |
1.7 | 3.1 | (43 | ) | ||||||||
Commercial |
3.1 | 2.0 | 50 | |||||||||
Segment operating profit
(1) |
$ | 78.3 | $ | 74.5 | 5 | |||||||
(1) | See Note 13 of our condensed consolidated financial statements for a reconciliation of
segment operating profit to income from continuing operations before interest and taxes. |
20
Table of Contents
The percentage changes in net revenues during the three months ended March 28, 2010 compared
to the same period in 2009 are due to the following factors:
% Increase / (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||
2010 vs. 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Medical | Aerospace | Commercial | Total | |||||||||||||
Core growth |
| (20 | ) | (6 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||||
Currency impact |
3 | 4 | 1 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Dispositions |
| | (4 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Total change |
3 | (16 | ) | (9 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||||
The following is a discussion of our segment operating results.
Comparison of the three months ended March 28, 2010 and March 29, 2009
Medical
Medical Segment net revenues increased 3% in the first quarter of 2010 to $343.5 million, from
$334.8 million in the same period last year. This increase was due entirely to foreign currency
movements, as core revenue was unchanged from the first quarter of 2009. Core revenue during the
first quarter of 2010 was negatively impacted 2% overall by a voluntary recall of our custom IV
tubing product, which is in the critical care product group. Other core revenue increases in the
North American, European and Asia/Latin American critical care product groups were offset by
declines in OEM orthopedic instrumentation products and in North American surgical products.
Information regarding net revenues by product group is provided in the following tables.
Three Months Ended | % Increase/ (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||
Currency | ||||||||||||||||||||
March 28, | March 29, | Core | Impact/ | Total | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Growth | Other | Change | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Critical Care |
$ | 225.9 | $ | 218.1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | |||||||||||||
Surgical Care |
63.1 | 63.3 | (4 | ) | 4 | | ||||||||||||||
Cardiac Care |
18.3 | 15.4 | 11 | 8 | 19 | |||||||||||||||
OEM |
35.3 | 34.2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
Other |
0.9 | 3.8 | (54 | ) | (24 | ) (a) | (78 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total net revenues |
$ | 343.5 | $ | 334.8 | | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||
(a) | Other in 2009 included the net revenues of a variable interest entity that was
deconsolidated in the first quarter of 2010 as a result of the adoption of new accounting
guidance. See Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements for information on
the new accounting guidance. |
Medical Segment net revenues for the three months ended March 28, 2010 and March 29, 2009,
respectively, by geographic location were as follows:
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
North America |
52 | % | 54 | % | ||||
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
37 | % | 36 | % | ||||
Asia and Latin America |
11 | % | 10 | % |
Excluding the impact of the custom IV tubing product recall initiated during the first quarter
of 2010, all of our critical care product categories (vascular, anesthesia, respiratory and
urology) contributed growth in the current quarter compared with the prior year, led principally by
higher sales of vascular, respiratory care, and anesthesia products in North America and Asia/Latin
America and urology products in North America and Europe. Respiratory care core revenue during the
first quarter of 2010 compared favorably with the same period of 2009 because of a weak flu season
and distributor inventory reductions that occurred in the first quarter of 2009.
21
Table of Contents
Surgical core revenue declined approximately 4% in the first quarter of 2010 compared with
2009. The decline resulted from lower sales of general instrument and closure devices mainly in
North America.
Core revenue of cardiac care products during the first quarter of 2010 compare favorably to
the same period of 2009 because 2009 first quarter revenues were adversely affected by sales
credits issued to customers and the related delay in shipments of replacement products in
connection with a voluntary recall of certain intra aortic balloon pump catheters.
Core revenue to OEMs increased 2% in the first quarter of 2010 compared with 2009. This
increase is largely attributable to higher sales of specialty products, partially offset by lower
sales of orthopedic instrumentation products due to customer inventory rebalancing, a reduction in
new product launches by OEM customers and overall weakness in the OEM orthopedic markets.
Operating profit in the Medical Segment increased 6%, from $69.4 million in the first quarter
of 2009 to $73.5 million during the first quarter of 2010. Operating profit during the first
quarter of 2010 was favorably impacted by a weaker U.S. dollar compared to the same period of a
year ago, improved sales mix of approximately $2 million (loss of lower margin custom IV tubing
sales were replaced with sales of higher margin vascular access products), lower manufacturing and
raw material costs of approximately $3 million and lower spending on remediation of FDA regulatory
issues of approximately $2 million, offset by approximately $5 million higher spending on sales,
marketing and research and development activities.
Aerospace
Aerospace Segment revenues declined 16% in the first quarter of 2010 to $36.9 million, from
$43.7 million in the same period in 2009. Core revenue declined 20%, while currency movements
increased sales 4%. Higher sales of wide-body cargo handling systems to aircraft manufacturers and
increases in actuation sales were more than offset by lower cargo systems sales for aftermarket
conversions, lower sales of narrow-body cargo handling systems, lower demand for cargo containers
and reduced sales of cargo system spare components and repairs.
Segment operating profit decreased 43% in the first quarter of 2010, from $3.1 million to $1.7
million. This decline was principally due to the sharply lower sales volumes across the product
lines noted above, including an unfavorable mix of lower margin systems sales compared with spares
and repairs. The decrease was partially offset by cost reduction initiatives that resulted in
operating cost reductions of approximately $1 million in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the
same period in 2009.
Commercial
Commercial Segment revenues declined approximately 9% in the first quarter of 2010 to $56.1
million, from $61.6 million in the same period last year. Core revenue reductions accounted for 6%
of the decline, which was a result of a decrease in demand for rigging services (16%), offset by an
increase in sales of marine products to OEM manufacturers for the recreational boat market and
spare parts in the Marine aftermarket (10%). Higher sales of Marine products are indicative of
improved conditions in that sector compared to the significantly depressed conditions that existed
during the same period of a year ago. However, markets served by our rigging services products
(oil and natural gas exploration, construction and material handling) continue to be weak.
During the first quarter of 2010, operating profit in the Commercial Segment increased 50%,
from $2.0 million in the first quarter of 2009 to $3.1 million, in spite of a 9% decrease in
revenue. The trend in operating income was favorably impacted by the elimination of approximately
$3 million of operating costs compared to the corresponding prior year quarter.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Operating activities from continuing operations provided net cash of approximately $32.2
million during the first three months of 2010. Year over year cash flow from operating activities
increased $39.8 million from the first quarter of 2009. The increase is due to a tax refund of
$49.4 million in 2010 coupled with improved operations from the synergies achieved through the
restructuring and integration programs as well as improved management of inventories and
receivables. The increase was partly offset by a decrease of $39.7 million that resulted from the
adoption of an amendment to Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification
topic 860, Transfers and Servicing (ASC topic 860) in the first quarter of 2010. Specifically,
upon adoption of the amendment, the accounts receivable that we previously treated as sold and
removed from the balance sheet under our securitization program are now required to be accounted
for as secured borrowings and reflected as short-term debt on our balance sheet. The effect of the
amendment is reflected in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows under financing
activities in the increase (decrease) in notes payable and current borrowings and under operating
activities in the accounts receivable use of cash.
Financing activities from continuing operations used net cash of $21.3 million during the
first three months of 2010 due to the payments of $51.1 million of long-term borrowings and $13.5
million of dividends, partly offset by the $39.7 million effect of adopting the amendment to ASC
topic 860. This amendment is reflected in the $39.7 million increase (decrease) in notes payable
and current borrowings source of cash reflecting the securitization program as a secured borrowing.
Other than the accounting amendment there has been no change to our securitization program.
22
Table of Contents
Investing activities from continuing operations provided net cash of $17.5 million during the
first three months of 2010 reflecting $24.8 million in proceeds from the sale of SSI, partly offset
by capital expenditures of $7.2 million.
On June 14, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $300 million of
our outstanding common stock. Repurchases of our stock under the Board authorization may be made
from time to time in the open market and may include privately-negotiated transactions as market conditions warrant and subject to regulatory considerations.
The stock repurchase program has no expiration date and our ability to execute on the program will
depend on, among other factors, cash requirements for acquisitions, cash generation from
operations, debt repayment obligations, market conditions and regulatory requirements. In
addition, our senior loan agreements limit the aggregate amount of share repurchases and other
restricted payments we may make to $75 million per year in the event our consolidated leverage
ratio exceeds 3.5 to 1. Accordingly, these provisions may limit our ability to repurchase shares
under this Board authorization. Through March 28, 2010, no shares have been purchased under this
Board authorization.
The following table provides our net debt to total capital ratio:
March 28, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||
Net debt includes: |
||||||||
Current
borrowings |
$ | 41.4 | $ | 4.0 | ||||
Long-term
borrowings |
1,141.3 | 1,192.5 | ||||||
Total
debt |
1,182.7 | 1,196.5 | ||||||
Less: Cash and cash
equivalents |
210.7 | 188.3 | ||||||
Net
debt |
$ | 972.0 | $ | 1,008.2 | ||||
Total capital includes: |
||||||||
Net
debt |
$ | 972.0 | $ | 1,008.2 | ||||
Total common shareholders
equity |
1,582.8 | 1,580.2 | ||||||
Total
capital |
$ | 2,554.8 | $ | 2,588.4 | ||||
Percent of net debt to total
capital |
38 | % | 39 | % |
Our senior credit agreement and senior note agreements, which we refer to as the senior loan
agreements, contain covenants that, among other things, limit or restrict our ability, and the
ability of our subsidiaries, to incur debt, create liens, consolidate, merge or dispose of certain
assets, make certain investments, engage in acquisitions, pay dividends on, repurchase or make
distributions in respect of capital stock and enter into swap agreements. These agreements also
require us to maintain a Consolidated Leverage Ratio (generally, Consolidated Total Indebtedness to
Consolidated EBITDA, each as defined in the senior credit agreement) and a Consolidated Interest
Coverage Ratio (generally, Consolidated EBITDA to Consolidated Interest Expense, each as defined in
the senior credit agreement) at specified levels as of the last day of any period of four
consecutive fiscal quarters ending on or nearest to the end of each calendar quarter, calculated
pursuant to the definitions and methodology set forth in the senior credit agreement.
As of March 28, 2010, the aggregate amount of debt maturing for each year is as follows
(dollars in millions):
2010 |
$ | 41.4 | ||
2011 |
145.0 | |||
2012 |
769.7 | |||
2013 |
| |||
2014 |
136.5 | |||
2015 and thereafter |
90.1 |
We believe that our cash flow from operations and our ability to access additional funds
through credit facilities will enable us to fund our operating requirements and capital
expenditures and meet debt obligations. As of March 28, 2010, we had no outstanding borrowings and
approximately $5 million in outstanding standby letters of credit issued under our $400 million
revolving credit facility. Depending on conditions in the capital markets and other factors, we
will from time to time consider other financing transactions, the proceeds of which could be
used to refinance current indebtedness or for other purposes.
23
Table of Contents
Potential Tax Legislation
President Obama and the U.S. Treasury Department proposed, on May 5, 2009, changing certain
tax rules for U.S. corporations doing business outside the United States. The proposed changes
would limit the ability of U.S. corporations to deduct expenses attributable to foreign earnings,
modify the foreign tax credit rules and further restrict the ability of U.S. corporations to
transfer funds between foreign subsidiaries without triggering U.S. income tax. It is unclear
whether these proposed tax reforms will be enacted or, if enacted, what the ultimate scope of the
reforms will be. Depending on their content, such reforms, if enacted, could have an adverse effect
on our future operating results.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have been no significant changes in market risk for the quarter ended March 28, 2010.
See the information set forth in Part II, Item 7A of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this report are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the
information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SECs rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
disclosure. A controls system cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the
controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all
control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.
(b) Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during our most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
24
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On October 11, 2007, the Companys subsidiary, Arrow International, Inc. (Arrow), received a
corporate warning letter from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The letter cited three
site-specific warning letters issued by the FDA in 2005 and subsequent inspections performed from
June 2005 to February 2007 at Arrows facilities in the United States. The letter expressed
concerns with Arrows quality systems, including complaint handling, corrective and preventive
action, process and design validation, inspection and training procedures. It also advised that
Arrows corporate-wide program to evaluate, correct and prevent quality system issues has been
deficient. Limitations on pre-market approvals and certificates for foreign governments had
previously been imposed on Arrow based on prior inspections and the corporate warning letter did
not impose additional sanctions that are expected to have a material financial impact on the
Company.
In connection with its acquisition of Arrow, completed on October 1, 2007, the Company
developed an integration plan that included the commitment of significant resources to correct
these previously-identified regulatory issues and further improve overall quality systems. Senior
management officials from the Company have met with FDA representatives, and a comprehensive
written corrective action plan was presented to FDA in late 2007. At the end of 2009, the FDA began
its reinspections of the Arrow facilities covered by the corporate warning letter. These
inspections have been completed, and the FDA has issued certain written observations to Arrow as a
result of those inspections. Arrow has responded in writing to those observations and is
communicating with the FDA regarding resolution of all outstanding issues.
While the Company continues to believe it has substantially remediated the issues raised in
the corporate warning letter through the corrective actions taken to date, and that it has
responded thoroughly and comprehensively to each of the observations resulting from the recent
inspections, there can be no assurance that these matters have been resolved to the satisfaction of
the FDA. If the Companys remedial actions are not satisfactory to the FDA, the Company may have
to devote additional financial and human resources to its efforts, and the FDA may take further
regulatory actions against the Company.
In addition, we are a party to various lawsuits and claims arising in the normal course of
business. These lawsuits and claims include actions involving product liability, intellectual
property, employment and environmental matters. Based on information currently available, advice
of counsel, established reserves and other resources, we do not believe that any such actions are
likely to be, individually or in the aggregate, material to our business, financial condition,
results of operations or liquidity. However, in the event of unexpected further developments, it is
possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, or other similar matters, if unfavorable,
may be materially adverse to our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no significant changes in risk factors for the quarter ended March 28, 2010.
See the information set forth in Part I, Item 1A of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable.
25
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. |
||
31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. |
||
32.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. |
||
32.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer, Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. |
26
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
TELEFLEX INCORPORATED |
||||
By: | /s/ Jeffrey P. Black | |||
Jeffrey P. Black | ||||
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
||||
By: | /s/ Richard A. Meier | |||
Richard A. Meier | ||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
||||
By: | /s/ Charles E. Williams | |||
Charles E. Williams | ||||
Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
Dated: April 27, 2010
27