Telidyne, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2011 June (Form 10-Q)

BUSINESS ORGANIZATION

Highland Ridge, Inc. (formerly known as Sea Green, Inc., Americom Networks Corp. and Americom Networks International, Inc.) was incorporated on July 22, 1988 in the State of a Delaware, United States of America. On June 9, 2010, the Company changed its name from Highland Ridge, Inc. to TEC Technology, Inc. (the “Company” or “HGHN”).

On May 4, 2010, the Company completed a reverse acquisition transaction pursuant to a share exchange agreement among the Company, TEC Technology Limited, a Hong Kong limited company (“TECT”) and TECT’s sole stockholder, Mr. Hua Peng Phillip Wong, whereby the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of TECT in exchange for 19,194,421 shares of its common stock, which constituted 63.6% of the Company’s issued and outstanding capital stock on a fully-diluted basis as of and immediately after the consummation of reverse acquisition. As a result of the acquisition of TECT, the Company now owns all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of TECT, which in turn owns Anhui TEC Tower Co., Ltd. (“ATEC”) and Shuncheng Taida Technology Co., Ltd. (“STT”). ATEC currently owns 90% of Zhejiang TEC Tower Co., Ltd. (“ZTEC”). For accounting purposes, the share exchange transaction with TECT was treated as a reverse acquisition and recapitalization of TECT, with TECT as the acquirer and HGHN as the acquired party. Upon completion of the exchange, TECT became a wholly owned subsidiary of HGHN. On the same date, Mr. Chun Lu, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of HGHN, entered into an option agreement with TECT and Mr. Hua Peng Phillip Wong, the Company’s controlling stockholder, pursuant to which Mr. Lu was granted an option to acquire 17,797,372 shares of the Company’s common stock currently owned by Mr. Wong for an aggregate exercise price of $1,000,000. Mr. Lu may exercise this option, in whole but not in part, during the period commencing on the 365th day following of the date of the option agreement and ending on the second anniversary of the date thereof. The accounting treatment for this transaction is essentially recapitalization of TECT with HGHN’s common stock.

TECT was organized as a private corporation, under the Companies Laws of the Hong Kong on November 11, 2009. It was principally established to serve as an investment holding company and its operation are carried out in Hong Kong. On February 22, 2010, TECT entered into an equity transfer agreement with Mr. Chun Lu, the sole shareholder of ATEC. The transfer was approved by the Department of Commerce of Anhui Province on March 2, 2010. This business combination was accounted for as entities under common control because the majority shareholders of TECT and ATEC were the same person.

ATEC is a private corporation, incorporated under the laws of the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) on July 3, 2007. ATEC’s principal activities are the development and manufacturing of mobile communication steel towers, microwave towers, angle steel towers, steel pipe towers and transmission cable towers.

ZTEC was established on December 7, 2009 as a PRC limited company with ATEC owning 90% of equity interest and Ms. Yiping Zhu, an individual, owning the remaining 10% equity interest. ZTEC’s production facility is still under construction and it has not yet commenced operations. ZTEC’s main business will include the development and manufacturing of mobile communication steel towers, microwave towers, angle steel towers, steel pipe towers and transmission cable towers.

STT was incorporated in the PRC on January 20, 2010. STT has not commenced operations and its main business will include engineering consultancy and design of mobile communication steel towers, microwave towers, angle steel towers, steel pipe towers and transmission cable towers.

As a result of the reverse acquisition of TECT, the Company entered into new businesses. The Company is primarily engaged, through its indirect Chinese subsidiaries, in the design, production and sale of transmission towers and related products used in high voltage electric power transmission and wireless communications.

The Company’s headquarter is located at Xinqiao Industrial Park, Jingde Country, Anhui Province, 242600, PRC.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

FISCAL YEAR

The Company has adopted December 31 as its fiscal year end.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

REPORTING ENTITIES

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the following entities:

BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION AND PRESENTATION

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“US GAAP”). In the opinion of management, the accompanying balance sheets, and statements of income, and cash flows include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, considered necessary to give a fair presentation of operating results for the periods presented. All material inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

On February 22, 2010, TECT entered into an equity transfer agreement with Mr. Chun Lu, the sole shareholder of ATEC. The transfer was approved by the Department of Commerce of Anhui Province on March 10, 2010. The business combination were accounted for as entities in is acquisition was accounted for as entities under common control because the majority shareholders of TECT and ATEC were the same people.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION AND PRESENTATION (CONTINUED)

On May 4, 2010, the Company completed a reverse acquisition transaction pursuant to a share exchange agreement among the Company, TECT and TECT’s sole stockholder, Mr. Hua Peng Phillip Wong, whereby the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of TECT in exchange for 19,194,421 shares of our common stock, which constituted 63.6% of the Company’s issued and outstanding capital stock on a fully-diluted basis as of and immediately after the consummation of reverse acquisition. As a result of the acquisition of TECT, the Company now owns all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of TECT, which in turn owns ATEC,ZTEC and STT. For accounting purposes, the share exchange transaction with TECT was treated as a reverse acquisition and recapitalization of TECT, with TECT as the acquirer and HGHN as the acquired party.

Upon completion of the exchange, TECTbecame wholly owned subsidiaries of HGHN. On the same date, Mr. Chun Lu, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of HGHN, entered into an option agreement with TECT and Mr. Hua Peng Phillip Wong, the Company’s controlling stockholder, pursuant to which Mr. Lu was granted an option to acquire 17,797,372 shares our common stock currently owned by Mr. Wong for an aggregate exercise price of $1,000,000. Mr. Lu may exercise this option, in whole but not in part, during the period commencing on the 365 ^th day following of the date of the option agreement and ending on the second anniversary of the date thereof.

Prior to the acquisition of ATEC by TECT, neither TECT nor HGHN has active business operatons. For reporting purposes, the Company has assumed that Mr. Lu exercised his option immediately and thus HGHN, TECT and ATEC are effectively under same control of Mr. Lu when the Company acquired ATEC. The acquisition transactions between (i) HGHN and TECT and (ii) TECT and ATEC are accounted for as reverse mergers.

For accounting purposes, the combination of the company and TECT was accounted for as a reverse merger with ATEC as the acquirer and HGHN and TECT as the acquired party and the acquisition of ZTEC and STT was accounted for under the acquisition method with TECT as the immediate parent corporation of both companies for legal purposes and the Company as the ultimate parent corporation. Accordingly the Company’s financial statements have been prepared on a consolidated basis for the periods presented and the consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows were presented as if the recapitalization had occurred at the beginning of the earliest period presented and the operations of the accounting acquired party from the date of stock exchange transaction.

HGHN, TECT, ATEC, ZTEC and STT are hereafter referred to as the Company.

Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The information included in this interim report should be read in conjunction with the information included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates.

ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL RISK

The Company’s business operations are conducted in the PRC and are subject to special considerations and risks not typically associated with companies in North America and Western Europe. China’s political, economic and legal environments may influence the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations, including adverse effects by changes in governmental policies in laws and regulations, anti- inflationary measures, and rates and methods of taxation.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company’s revenue recognition policies are in compliance with ASC 605. Sales revenue is recognized when all of the following have occurred: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, (iii) the price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) the ability to collect is reasonably assured. These criteria are generally satisfied at the time of shipment when risk of loss and title passes to the customer. For international sales, the revenue recognition criteria are generally satisfied under Free on Board (“FOB”) and Cost Insurance Freight (“CIF”) terms, in which the Company’s reponsibility ends once the goods clear the port of shipment.

Technical consulting service income is recognized when the relevant service is rendered.

Government grants represent local authority grants to the company for infrastructure development and the revenue is recognized on cash basis when the local authority approves the grant to the company.

The Company recognizes revenue when the goods are delivered and title has passed. Sales revenue represents the invoiced value of goods, net of a value-added tax (VAT). All of the Company’s products that are sold in the PRC are subject to a Chinese value-added tax at a rate of 17% of the gross sales price or at a rate approved by the Chinese local government. This VAT liability may be offset by the VAT paid by the Company on raw materials and other materials included in the cost of producing their finished product.

SHIPPING AND HANDLING

Shipping and handling costs related to costs of goods sold are included in cost of sales and selling and marketing expenses which totaled $226,765 and $149,852 for the three months June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Shipping and handling costs amounted to $355,866 and $289,572 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010.

ADVERTISING

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and totaled $0 and $1,539 for the three months June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and totaled $0 and $2,582 for the six months June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS

Research and development costs include costs incurred to develop new products and are charged to operations when incurred. These costs totaled $0 as incurred for the three months ended June 31, 2011 and 2010 and for the six months ended June 30, 2011and 2010, respectively.The costs for development of new products and substantial enhancements to existing products are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility has been established, at which time any additional costs would be capitalized.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash in bank and on hand, demand deposits with banks and other financial institutions, and short-term, highly liquid investments which are readily convertible into known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value, and have a short maturity of generally within three months when acquired.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The reporting currency of the Company is United States Dollars ($). The functional currency of the Company is United States Dollars ($) and the functional currency of its subsidiaries ATEC, ZTEC, STT and TECT is Chinese Renminbi (RMB).

For those entities whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollars, all assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date; shareholders’ equity is translated at historical rates and items in the statements of income and of cash flows are translated at the average rate for the period. Because cash flows are translated based on the average translation rate, amounts related to assets and liabilities reported in the statement of cash flows will not necessarily agree with changes in the corresponding balances in the balance sheet. Translation adjustments resulting from this process are included in accumulated other comprehensive income in the statement of shareholders’ equity. Transaction gains and losses that arise from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency are included in the results of operations as incurred.

Foreign currency translation gain included in accumulated other comprehensive income amounted to $982,264 as of June 30, 2011 and $683,041 as of December 31, 2010. The balance sheet amounts with the exception of equity as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were translated at RMB6.46 to $1.00 and RMB6.82 to $1.00, respectively. The average translation rates applied to the statements of income and of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 were RMB6.55 to $1.00 and RMB6.82 to $1.00, respectively.

BUSINESS COMBINATION

The Company adopted the accounting pronouncements relating to business combinations (primarily contained in ASC Topic 805 “Business Combinations”), including assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contingencies. These pronouncements established principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquire as well as provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. In addition, these pronouncements eliminate the distinction between contractual and non-contractual contingencies, including the initial recognition and measurement criteria and require an acquirer to develop a systematic and rational basis for subsequently measuring and accounting for acquired contingencies depending on their nature. Our adoption of these pronouncements will have an impact on the manner in which we account for any future acquisitions.

NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST IN CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company adopted the accounting pronouncement on non-controlling interests in consolidated financial statements, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This guidance is primarily contained in ASC Topic “Consolidation”. The adoption of this standard has not had material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses. .

Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets.

An item of property and equipment is removed from the accounts upon disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected to arise from the continued use of the asset. Any gain or loss arising on the sale or disposal of the asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the item) is included in the statements of income in the period the item is sold or otherwise disposed. Maintenance and repairs of property and equipment are charged to operations when incurred. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred, whereas major betterments are capitalized as additions to property and equipment. The Company reviews its property and equipment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of certain assets might not be recoverable. In these instances, the Company recognizes an impairment loss when it is probable that the estimated cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset. To date, no such impairment losses have been recorded.

LAND USE RIGHTS

Land use rights represent acquisition of land use rights of industrial land from local government and is amortized on the straight line over their respective lease periods. The lease period of agriculture land is 50 years.

CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS

Construction in progress represents direct costs of construction as well as acquisition and design fees incurred. Capitalization of these costs ceases and the construction in progress is transferred to property, plant and equipment when substantially all the activities necessary to prepare the assets for their intended use are completed. No depreciation is provided until construction is completed and the asset is ready for its intended use.

IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS AND INTANGBLE ASSETS

In accordance with ASC Topic 360,”Property, Plant and Equipment”, long-lived assets to be held and used are analyzed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. The Company reviews the carrying amount of its long-lived assets, including intangibles, for impairment, each reporting period. An asset is considered impaired when estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset. In the event the carrying amount of such asset is considered not recoverable, the asset is adjusted to its fair value. Fair value is generally determined based on discounted future cash flow. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company determined no impairment charges were necessary.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

CAPITALIZED INTERNAL-USE SOFTWARE

The Company capitalizes certain costs incurred to purchase or create internal-use software in accordance with ASC Topic 350-40, “Internal Use Software”. To date, such costs have included external direct costs of materials and services incurred in the implementation of internal-use software and are included within computer hardware and software. Once the capitalization criteria have been met, such costs are classified as software and are amortized on a straight-line basis over five years once the software has been put into use. Subsequent additions, modifications, or upgrades to internal-use software are capitalized only to the extent that they allow the software to perform a task it previously did not perform. Software maintenance and training costs are expensed in the period in which they are incurred.

INVENTORY

Inventory consists primarily of raw materials, work in progress, and finished goods. Raw materials are stated at cost. Cost comprises direct materials and, where applicable direct labor costs and applicable overhead costs that have been incurred in bringing the inventory to its present location and condition. Finished goods are stated at the lower of cost (determined on first in first out method) and net realizable value.

Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale.

The Company provides for inventory losses based on obsolescence and levels in excess of forecasted demand In these cases, inventory is reduced to estimated realizable value based on historical usage and expected demand. Inherent in the Company’s estimates of market value in determining inventory valuation are estimates related to economic trends, future demand for the Company’s products, and technical obsolescence of products.

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses on accounts receivable. Management reviews he composition of accounts receivable and analyzes historical bad debts, customers concentrations, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment patterns and changes in customer payment patterns to evaluate the adequacy of these reserves. Reserves are primarily on a specific identification basis.

The standard credit period of the Company’s most of clients is three months. Management evaluates the collectability of the receivables at least quarterly. The estimated average collection period was 90 days as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

INCOME TAXES

The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of Topic ASC 740 “Accounting for Income Taxes”. Under ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities using the tax bases of assets and liabilities using the enacted taxes rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse.

Provision for income taxes consist of taxes currently due plus deferred taxes. Since the Company had no operations within the United States there is no provision for US income taxes and there are no deferred tax amounts as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

Deferred income taxes are calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period when the asset is realized or the liability is settled. Deferred tax is charged or credited in the income statement, except when it related to items credited or charged directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also dealt with in equity. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the Company intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)

The provision for income tax is based on the results for the year as adjusted for items, which are non- assessable or disallowed. It is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. Deferred tax is accounted for using the balance sheet liability method in respect of temporary differences arising from differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the corresponding tax basis used in the computation of assessable tax profit. In principle, deferred tax liabilities are recognized for all taxable temporary differences, and deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilized.

Deferred income taxes are calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period when the asset is realized or the liability is settled. Deferred tax is charged or credited in the income statement, except when it related to items credited or charged directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also dealt with in equity. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the Company intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.

Topic ASC 740 also prescribes a more-likely-than-not threshold for financial statements recognition and measurement of a tax position taken, or expected to be taken, in a tax return. Topic ASC 740 also provide guidance related to, among other things, classification, accounting for interest and penalties associated with tax positions, and disclosure requirements. Any interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits will be recorded in tax expense.

RELATED PARTIES

Parties are considered to be related to the company if the company has the ability, directly or indirectly, to control the party, or exercise significant influence over the party in making financial and operating decisions, or where the company and the party are subject to common control. Related parties may be individuals (being members of key management personnel, significant shareholders and/or their close family members) or other entities which are under the significant influence of related parties of the company.

PRODUCT WARRANTIES

Substantially all of the Company’s products are covered by a standard warranty of 1 to 2 years for products. In the event of a failure of products covered by this warranty, the Company must repair or replace the software or products or, if those remedies are insufficient, and at the discretion of the Company, provide a refund. The Company provides 0% of sales income for product warranties for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010. The product warranty reserve was $0 as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES

On May 4, 2010, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement which has been accounted for as a reverse merger since there has been a change of control. The Company computes the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding in accordance with ASC Topic 805 “Business Combination” which states that in calculating the weighted average shares when a reverse merger takes place in the middle of the year, the number of common shares outstanding from the beginning of that period to the acquisition date shall be computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares of the legal acquiree (the accounting acquirer) outstanding during the period multiplied by the exchange ratio established in the merger agreement. The number of common shares outstanding from the acquisition date to the end of that period shall be the actual number of common shares of the legal acquirer (the accounting acquiree) outstanding during that period.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

ECONOMIC, POLITICAL AND BUSINESS RISK

The Company's operations are carried out in the PRC. Accordingly, the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations may be influenced by the political, economic and legal environment in the PRC, and by the general state of the PRC's economy. The Company's operations in the PRC are subject to specific considerations and significant risks not typically associated with companies in North America and Western Europe. The Company's results may be adversely affected by changes in governmental policies with respect to laws and regulations, anti-inflationary measures, currency conversion and remittance abroad, and rates and methods of taxation, among other things.

CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK

Cash includes demand deposits in accounts maintained at banks within the People’s Republic of China. Total cash in these banks as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 amounted to $2,659,363 and $2,088,297, of which no deposits are covered by insurance. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any risks on its cash in bank accounts.

Accounts receivable are derived from revenue earned from customers located primarily in the People’s Republic of China. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of customers and have not experienced any material losses to date.

The Company had 5 major customers whose revenue individually represented the following percentages of the Company’s total revenue:

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK (CONTINUED)

The company had 5 major customers whose accounts receivable balance individually represented of the Company’s total accounts receivable as follows:

EARNINGS PER SHARE

As prescribed in ASC Topic 260 “Earning per Share”, Basic Earnings per Share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common stock shares outstanding during the year. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common stock shares outstanding during the year plus potential dilutive instruments such as stock options and warrants. The effect of stock options on diluted EPS is determined through the application of the treasury stock method, whereby proceeds received by the Company based on assumed exercises are hypothetically used to repurchase the Company’s common stock at the average market price during the period.

For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, basic and diluted earnings per share amount to $0.01 and $0.04, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, basic and diluted earnings per share amount to $0.01 and $0.04, respectively.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:

Level 1   Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2   Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting.

Level 3   Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or a non-recurring basis, consequently, the Company did not have any fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010, nor gains or losses are reported in the statement of income and comprehensive income that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date for the fiscal periods ended June 30, 2011 or June 30, 2010.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company adopted ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation” and ASC Topic 505-50 “Equity – Based Payments to Non-Employees” using the fair value method. Under ASC Topic 718 and ASC Topic 505-50, stock compensation expenses is measured at the grant date on the value of the option or restricted stock and is recognized as expenses, less expected forfeitures, over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period.

On June 15, 2010, HGHN issued, a warrant to purchase 80,000 shares at a price of $2.00 per share. The warrant vests in four equal installments on June 30^th, September 30^th, December 31^st 2010 and March 31^st of 2011. In the event that the agreement is terminated prior to the vesting date, such portion of the warrant shall not vest and the holder of the warrant shall not be entitled to exercise such unvested portion of the warrant. The warrant expires on June 15, 2015.

RETIREMENT BENEFIT COSTS

PRC state managed retirement benefit programs are defined contribution programs and the payments to these programs are charged as expenses when employees have rendered service entitling them to the contribution.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

ASC Topic 220 “Comprehensive Income” establishes standards for reporting and displaying comprehensive income and its components in financial statements. Comprehensive income is defined as the change in stockholders’ equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. The comprehensive income for all periods presented includes both the reported net income and net change in cumulative translation adjustments.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In January 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-01, Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash. The amendments in this Update clarify that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying Topics 505 and 260 (Equity and Earnings Per Share). The amendments in this update are effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009, and should be applied on a retrospective basis. The Company adopted this standard and has determined the standard does not have material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-02 regarding accounting and reporting for decreases in ownership of a subsidiary. Under this guidance, an entity is required to deconsolidate a subsidiary when the entity ceases to have a controlling financial interest in the subsidiary. Upon deconsolidation of a subsidiary, and entity recognizes a gain or loss on the transaction and measures any retained investment in the subsidiary at fair value. In contrast, an entity is required to account for a decrease in its ownership interest of a subsidiary that does not result in a change of control of the subsidiary as an equity transaction. This ASU clarifies the scope of the decrease in ownership provisions, and expands the disclosures about the deconsolidation of a subsidiary or de-recognition of a group of assets. This ASU is effective for beginning in the first interim or annual reporting period ending on or after December 31, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements In January 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-02 – Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary – a Scope Clarification. The amendments in this Update affect accounting and reporting by an entity that experiences a decrease in ownership in a subsidiary that is a business or nonprofit activity. The amendments also affect accounting and reporting by an entity that exchanges a group of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity for an equity interest in another entity. The amendments in this update are effective beginning in the period that an entity adopts SFAS No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – An Amendment of ARB No. 51.” If an entity has previously adopted SFAS No. 160 as of the date the amendments in this update are included in the Accounting Standards Codification, the amendments in this update are effective beginning in the first interim or annual reporting period ending on or after December 15, 2009. The amendments in this update should be applied retrospectively to the first period that an entity adopted SFAS No. 160. The Company adopted this standard and has determined the standard does not have material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06 – Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that requires new disclosure as follows: 1) Transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2. A reporting entity should disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. 2) Activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. In the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements (that is, on a gross basis rather than as one net number). This update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that clarify existing disclosures as follows: 1) Level of disaggregation. A reporting entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities. A class is often a subset of assets or liabilities within a line item in the statement of financial position. A reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities. 2) Disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. A reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. Those disclosures are required for fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3.The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU, however, the Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (CONTINUED)

In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-09, “Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements,” or ASU 2010-09. ASU 2010-09 primarily rescinds the requirement that, for listed companies, financial statements clearly disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. Subsequent events must still be evaluated through the date of financial statement issuance; however, the disclosure requirement has been removed to avoid conflicts with other SEC guidelines. ASU 2010-09 was effective immediately upon issuance and was adopted in February 2010.

In April 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-13, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades,” or ASU 2010-13. ASU 2010-13 provides amendments to Topic 718 to clarify that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in currency of a market in which a substantial porting of the entity’s equity securities trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-17 to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update 2010-17, “Revenue Recognition—Milestone Method (Topic 605): Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition” or ASU 2010-17 . This Update provides guidance on the recognition of revenue under the milestone method, which allows a vendor to adopt an accounting policy to recognize all of the arrangement consideration that is contingent on the achievement of a substantive milestone (milestone consideration) in the period the milestone is achieved. The pronouncement is effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-17 does not have any significant impacts on the consolidated financial statements.

In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, “Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.” This update amends codification topic 310 on receivables to improve the disclosures that an entity provides about the credit quality of its financing receivables and the related allowance for credit losses. As a result of these amendments, an entity is required to disaggregate by portfolio segment or class certain existing disclosures and provide certain new disclosures about its financing receivables and related allowance for credit losses. This guidance is being phased in, with the new disclosure requirements for period end balances effective as of December 31, 2010, and the new disclosure requirements for activity during the reporting period are effective March 31, 2011. The troubled debt restructuring disclosures in this ASU have been delayed by ASU 2011-01 “Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20,” which was issued in January 2011.

In December 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-28 which amend “Intangibles- Goodwill and Other” (Topic 350). The ASU modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting entities, they are required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. An entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing guidance in Topic 350, which requires that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances changes that would more likely than not reduce the faire value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. ASU 2010-28 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU; however, the Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-29 which address diversity in practice about the interpretation of the pro forma revenue and earnings disclosure requirements for business combinations (Topic 805). This ASU specifies that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. This ASU also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures under Topic 805 to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. ASU 2010-29 is effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU and expected the adoption of this ASU will have an impact on its future business combination.

INCOME TAXES

No provision for income taxes in the United States has been made as the Company has no income taxable in the United States.

No Hong Kong corporate income tax has been provided in the financial statements, as TECT did not have any assessable profits for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

Beginning January 1, 2008, the new Enterprise Income Tax (“EIT”) law replaced the existing laws for Domestic Enterprises (“DEs”) and Foreign Invested Enterprises (“FIEs”). The new standard EIT rate of 25% replaced the 33% rate currently applicable to both DEs and FIEs. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the new EIT will have on its financial condition. Beginning January 1, 2008, China unified the corporate income tax rule on foreign invested enterprises and domestic enterprises. The unified corporate income tax rate is 25%.

Provision for income tax of the company’s subsidiary ATEC is made at the unified EIT rate of 25% for the year ended December 31, 2010 but ATEC is entitled to a refund of 10% according to local preferential tax policy for manufacturing of high technology products for the three years from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2013. Therefore, the provision for income tax of the company’s subsidiary ATEC is made at the local preferential EIT rate of 15% for the year ended December 31, 2010.

The company’s subsidiaries ZTEC and STT have not commenced their business, therefore no provision for income taxes has been made for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

The following table reconciles the U.S statutory rates to the company’s effective tax rate for the June 30, 2011:

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

RESTRICTED CASH

The Company’s restricted cash consists of bank time deposits in the bank as security deposits for the completion of certain projects of the company. The Company is required to keep certain amounts on deposit that are subject to withdrawal restrictions. Restricted cash amounted to $109,466 and $1,164,598 as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

The Company has performed an analysis on all of its accounts receivable and determined that all amounts are probable of collection within one year. As such, all trade receivables are reflected as a current asset and no additional allowance for doubtful debt has been recorded for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011and 2010. Bad debts written off for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are $0.

Aging of accounts receivable is as follows:

INVENTORY

DEPOSITS AND PREPAID EXPENSES

Guarantee deposits are provided to financial institutions in return for the issuance of a corporate guarantee to financiers. Advances to suppliers are down payments or deposits for inventory purchases. ZTEC acquired land use rights of new land in the PRC and paid deposits for the acquisition of land use rights,

OTHER RECEIVABLES

TAXES RECOVERABLE

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

LAND USE RIGHTS

Private ownership of land is not permitted in the PRC. The Company has leased three lots of land at Xinqiao Industrial Park, Jingde Country, Anhui Province. The total cost of these land use rights of ATEC was $2,112,867 and the leases expire in 2056, 2058 and 2058 respectively. The Company has leased additional lots of land at Songxi Village, Xindeng Town, Fuyang City, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province. The total cost of these land use rights of ZTEC was $5,781,780 and the leases expire in 2061.

CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS

TAXES PAYABLE

SHORT TERM BORROWINGS

There are no provisions in the Company’s bank borrowings that would accelerate repayment of debt as a result of a change in credit ratings or a material adverse change in the Company’s business. Under certain agreements, the Company has the option to retire debt prior to maturity, either at par or at a premium over par.

secured by land use rights

Customer deposits represent amounts advanced by customers for orders of product. The products normally are shipped within three months after receipt of the advance payment and the related sale is recognized in accordance with the Company’s revenue recognition policy. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, customer deposits amounted to $33,339 and $80,331, respectively.

COMMON STOCK

The Company has authorized Preferred stock of 10,000,000 shares with a par value of $0.001. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the company has not issued any preferred shares.

The Company has authorized common stock of 300,000,000 shares with a par value of $0.001.

On May 4, 2010, the Company issued 19,194,421 shares of common stock to the shareholders of TECT. The total consideration for the 19,194,421 shares was 10,000 shares of TECT, which is all the issued and outstanding capital stock of TEC.

As a result of the reverse merger, the equity account of the Company, prior to the share exchange date, has been retroactively restated so that the ending outstanding share balance as of the share exchange date is equal to the number of post share-exchange shares.

As of June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the Company has outstanding 30,181,552 issued common shares with a par value of $0.001 per share respectively.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Total lease expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $20,183 and $3,225, respectively. Total lease expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $23,633 and $5,343, respectively.

The future minimum lease payments as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were $0.

From time to time and in the ordinary course of business, the Company may be subject to various claims, charges, and litigation. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company did not have any pending claims, charges, or litigation that it expects would have a material adverse effect on its consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of income or cash flows.

The Company has entered into two separate agreements that would require the Company to pay liquidated damages if the Company failed to perform under the agreements. The amount of the potential damages are listed below:

STOCK OPTIONS & WARRANTS

The Company accounts for its stock options and warrants in accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation” and ASC Topic 505-50 “Equity – Based Payments to Non-Employees” which were adopted by the Company on June 15, 2010. The company issued a warrant to a third party for the purchase of 80,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $2.00 per share. The warrant vests in four equal installations on June 30^th, September 30^th, December 31^th of 2010 and March 31, 2011. The warrant expires on June 15, 2015.

The Company determines the estimated fair value of share-based awards using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes model is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as by assumptions regarding certain complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to; the Company’s expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards and the actual and projected option exercise behaviors. The Company calculated a stock based compensation of $93,800 and recognized $93,800 in stock based compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the prepaid compensation expense amount was $0 and $31,600, respectively

CCG was issued a warrant to purchase up to 80,000 shares of the Company’s stock, at a price of $2.00 per share, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a letter agreement, dated June 20, 2010, between the Company and CCG. CCG's right to exercise its warrant will vest in four equal portions, with the first portion vesting on June 20, 2010, and the remaining portions vesting on September 30, 2010, December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2011, respectively. The warrant shall have a term of 5 years and expires on June 15, 2015 and contains $90,000 liquidated damages provision for breach of such exclusivity. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, CCG had not exercised the warrant.

PRODUCT LINE INFORMATION

The Company sells towers, which are used by customers in various industries. The production process, class of customer, selling practice and distribution process are the same for all towers. The Company’s chief operating decision-makers (i.e. chief executive officer and other members of management) review financial information presented on a consolidated basis, accompanied by disaggregated information about revenues by product lines for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. There are no segment managers who are held accountable for operations, operating results and plans for levels or components below the consolidated unit level. The Company considers itself to be operating within one reportable segment. The Company does not have long- lived assets located in foreign countries. The Company's net revenue from external customers by main product lines is as follows:

RELATED PARTIES TRANSACTIONS

In addition to the transactions and balances as disclosed elsewhere in these consolidated financial statements, the Company had no other significant related party transactions.

On January 13, 2010, the Company entered into and closed a share purchase agreement with Mr. Michael Anthony, the CEO of the Company at the time, and certain accredited purchasers signatory thereto, pursuant to which the Company sold an aggregate of 10,880,000 shares of common stock of the Company for a total of $225,000. Simultaneously with and as a condition to the closing of the share purchase agreement, the Company re-purchased 10,880,000 common shares from Corporate Services International Profit Sharing and Century Capital Partners, LLC, which are both beneficially owned by Mr. Anthony, for an aggregate purchase price of $225,000.

                               Name of related party

Nature of transactions

Mr. Chun Lu, former stockholder and his affiliates

Included in other payable, due to former stockholder and its affiliates are $3,429,273 and $2,789,568 as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The amounts are unsecured, interest free and has no fixed term of repayment.

Certifications of Principal Executive Officer filed pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Certifications of Principal Financial Officer filed pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Certifications of Principal Executive Officer furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Certifications of Principal Financial Officer furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T*