TELLURIAN INC. /DE/ - Quarter Report: 2007 December (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(MARK
ONE)
R
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended December 31, 2007
£
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
|
For the transition
period
from to
Commission
file number 1-5507
MAGELLAN
PETROLEUM CORPORATION
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE
|
06-0842255
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
10
Columbus Boulevard, Hartford, Connecticut
|
06106
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(860)
293-2006
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer
Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer R Smaller reporting company
(Do not
check if a smaller reporting company)
The
number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s single class of common stock as of
February 07, 2008 was 41,500,325.
MAGELLAN
PETROLEUM CORPORATION
FORM
10-Q
December
31, 2007
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
PAGE
|
|
PART
I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
3
|
|
3
|
|
4
|
|
5
|
|
6
|
|
9
|
|
16
|
|
ITEM
4 Controls and Procedures
|
16
|
PART
II — OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM
1 Legal Proceedings
|
17
|
17
|
|
18
|
|
ITEM
5 Other Events
|
18
|
ITEM
6 Exhibits
|
18
|
19
|
|
35 | |
EX-31:
CERTIFICATIONS
|
35
|
EX-32:
CERTIFICATIONS
|
36
|
2
MAGELLAN
PETROLEUM CORPORATION
FORM
10-Q
PART I -
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31,
2007
|
JUNE 30,
2007
|
|||||||
(UNAUDITED)
|
(NOTE)
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 30,232,678 | $ | 28,470,448 | ||||
Accounts
receivable — Trade (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $81,500 and
$69,658 at December 31 and June 30, 2007, respectively)
|
8,620,669 | 5,044,258 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable-working interest partners
|
350,269 | — | ||||||
Marketable
securities
|
2,404,507 | 2,974,280 | ||||||
Inventories
|
1,096,024 | 702,356 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
260,832 | 378,808 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
42,964,979 | 37,570,150 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
1,330,021 | 2,300,830 | ||||||
Marketable
securities
|
1,000,000 | 1,403,987 | ||||||
Property
and equipment, net:
|
||||||||
Oil
and gas properties (successful efforts method)
|
126,296,515 | 120,734,449 | ||||||
Land,
buildings and equipment
|
2,983,336 | 2,846,433 | ||||||
Field
equipment
|
948,532 | 912,396 | ||||||
130,228,383 | 124,493,278 | |||||||
Less
accumulated depletion, depreciation and amortization
|
(93,397,178 | ) | (84,172,522 | ) | ||||
Net
property and equipment
|
36,831,205 | 40,320,756 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
4,020,706 | 4,020,706 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 86,146,911 | $ | 85,616,429 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 2,425,177 | $ | 5,313,653 | ||||
Accounts
payable-working interest partners
|
— | 222,883 | ||||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
1,566,905 | 1,382,320 | ||||||
Income
taxes payable
|
12,068,510 | 1,647,137 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
16,060,592 | 8,565,993 | ||||||
Long
term liabilities:
|
||||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
2,977,321 | 3,518,990 | ||||||
Other
long term liabilities
|
39,593 | 100,578 | ||||||
Asset
retirement obligations
|
10,222,099 | 9,456,088 | ||||||
Total
long term liabilities
|
13,239,013 | 13,075,656 | ||||||
Commitments
|
— | — | ||||||
Stockholders’
equity:
|
||||||||
Common
stock, par value $.01 per share:
|
||||||||
Authorized
200,000,000 shares, outstanding 41,500,325
|
415,001 | 415,001 | ||||||
Capital
in excess of par value
|
73,153,002 | 73,153,002 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(23,248,802 | ) | (13,965,849 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
6,528,105 | 4,372,626 | ||||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
56,847,306 | 63,974,780 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 86,146,911 | $ | 85,616,429 |
Note: The
balance sheet at June 30, 2007 has been derived from the audited consolidated
financial statements at that date.
See
accompanying notes.
3
MAGELLAN
PETROLEUM CORPORATION
FORM
10-Q
PART I - FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
ITEM 1
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
THREE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
|
SIX MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
|
|||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||
REVENUES:
|
||||||||||||||||
Oil
sales
|
$ | 4,887,721 | $ | 3,227,393 | $ | 9,620,541 | $ | 6,152,907 | ||||||||
Gas
sales
|
4,772,980 | 4,490,952 | 8,762,164 | 7,894,350 | ||||||||||||
Other
production related revenues
|
713,280 | 695,740 | 1,313,209 | 1,189,992 | ||||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
10,373,981 | 8,414,085 | 19,695,914 | 15,237,249 | ||||||||||||
COSTS
AND EXPENSES:
|
||||||||||||||||
Production
costs
|
2,525,231 | 1,806,267 | 4,623,257 | 3,597,406 | ||||||||||||
Exploration
and dry hole costs
|
724,117 | 2,541,280 | 2,737,591 | 2,973,263 | ||||||||||||
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
375,840 | 394,972 | 820,349 | 710,102 | ||||||||||||
Depletion,
depreciation and amortization
|
2,796,390 | 2,762,867 | 5,957,646 | 4,764,819 | ||||||||||||
Auditing,
accounting and legal services
|
321,052 | 148,204 | 558,103 | 324,009 | ||||||||||||
Accretion
expense
|
176,180 | 134,413 | 346,388 | 266,179 | ||||||||||||
Shareholder
communications
|
154,222 | 159,342 | 201,288 | 235,890 | ||||||||||||
Gain
on sale of field equipment
|
(17,304 | ) | — | (26,957 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Other
administrative expenses
|
771,732 | 644,969 | 1,641,645 | 1,167,581 | ||||||||||||
Total
costs and expenses
|
7,827,460 | 8,592,314 | 16,859,310 | 14,039,249 | ||||||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
2,546,521 | (178,229 | ) | 2,836,604 | 1,198,000 | |||||||||||
Interest
income
|
569,862 | 425,793 | 1,059,079 | 770,913 | ||||||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
3,116,383 | 247,564 | 3,895,683 | 1,968,913 | ||||||||||||
Income
tax provision
|
(12,797,866 | ) | (255,471 | ) | (13,178,636 | ) | (946,684 | ) | ||||||||
NET
(LOSS) INCOME
|
(9,681,483 | ) | (7,907 | ) | (9,282,953 | ) | 1,022,229 | |||||||||
Average
number of shares outstanding
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
41,500,325 | 41,500,325 | 41,500,325 | 41,500,325 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
|
41,500,325 | 41,500,325 | 41,500,325 | 41,500,325 | ||||||||||||
NET
(LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE (BASIC AND DILUTED)
|
$ | (.23 | ) | $ | (.00 | ) | $ | (.22) | $ | .02 |
See
accompanying notes
4
MAGELLAN
PETROLEUM CORPORATION
FORM
10-Q
PART I -
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
SIX MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
|
||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$ | (9,282,953 | ) | $ | 1,022,229 | |||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Gain
from sale of field equipment
|
(26,957 | ) | — | |||||
Depletion,
depreciation and amortization
|
5,957,646 | 4,764,819 | ||||||
Accretion
expense
|
346,388 | 266,179 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
520,228 | 1,180,020 | ||||||
Stock
option expense
|
— | 4,950 | ||||||
Exploration
and dry hole costs
|
2,685,371 | 2,861,197 | ||||||
Increase
(decrease) in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(3,290,960 | ) | (1,234,337 | ) | ||||
Other
assets
|
117,976 | 61,748 | ||||||
Inventories
|
(358,054 | ) | 26,709 | |||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
(3,376,192 | ) | (600,474 | ) | ||||
Income
taxes payable
|
10,360,482 | (469,226 | ) | |||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
3,652,975 | 7,883,814 | ||||||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of field equipment
|
26,957 | — | ||||||
Additions
to property and equipment
|
(1,401,692 | ) | (429,874 | ) | ||||
Oil
and gas exploration activities
|
(2,685,371 | ) | (2,861,197 | ) | ||||
Marketable
securities matured
|
1,474,988 | 539,675 | ||||||
Marketable
securities purchased
|
(501,228 | ) | (385,347 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(3,086,346 | ) | (3,136,743 | ) | ||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
— | — | ||||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
1,195,601 | 2,422,556 | ||||||
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
1,762,230 | 7,169,627 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
28,470,448 | 21,882,882 | ||||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
|
$ | 30,232,678 | $ | 29,052,509 | ||||
Cash
Payments:
|
||||||||
Income
taxes
|
2,297,926 | 487,312 | ||||||
Interest
|
— | |||||||
Supplemental
Schedule of Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities:
At
December 31, 2007 and 2006, accounts payable included $1,654,587 and $2,696,030
of payables related to property and equipment. A revision to
estimates of asset retirement obligations for $42,882 was made at December 31,
2007.
See
accompanying notes.
5
MAGELLAN
PETROLEUM CORPORATION
FORM
10-Q
PART I -
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1.
Basis of Presentation
Magellan
Petroleum Corporation (the “Company” or “MPC”) is engaged in the sale of oil and
gas and the exploration for and development of oil and gas reserves. MPC’s
principal asset is a 100% equity interest in its subsidiary, Magellan Petroleum
Australia Limited (“MPAL”). MPAL’s major assets are two petroleum production
leases covering the Mereenie oil and gas field (35% working interest), one
petroleum production lease covering the Palm Valley gas field (52% working
interest), and three petroleum production leases covering the Nockatunga oil
field (41% working interest). Both the Mereenie and Palm Valley fields are
located in the Amadeus Basin in the Northern Territory of Australia. The
Nockatunga field is located in the Cooper Basin in South Australia. The Palm
Valley Darwin contract expires in January, 2012 and the Mereenie contracts
expire in June, 2009. MPC has a direct 2.67% carried interest in the Kotaneelee
gas field in the Yukon Territory of Canada.
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of MPC and MPAL, collectively the Company, and have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and
Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles
for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All such
adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the three
and six months ended December 31, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the
results that may be expected for the year ending June 30, 2008. For further
information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes
thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
June 30, 2007. All amounts presented are in United States dollars, unless
otherwise noted.
Certain
reclassifications of prior period data included in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements have been made to conform with current financial statement
presentation. An increase in construction payables of $1,830,464 for the six
months ended December 31, 2006 has been reclassified to additions to property
and equipment on the consolidated statements of cash flows. This
reclassification did not impact previously reported subtotals for operating,
investing or financing cash flows.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS
No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
This Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or
permit fair value measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those
accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute.
Accordingly, this Statement does not require any new fair value measurements.
SFAS 157 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2008. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of SFAS 157
will have on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 “The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities,” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 provides companies
with an option to report selected financial assets and financial liabilities at
fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option
has been elected are reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date.
SFAS 159 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2008. The Company is
currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 159 on its
consolidated financial statements.
6
Note 2.
Comprehensive Income
Total
comprehensive income (loss) during the three and six month periods ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 was as follows:
THREE
MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
|
SIX
MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE
(INCOME)LOSS
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
at June 30, 2007
|
$ | 4,372,626 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$ | (9,681,483 | ) | $ | (7,907 | ) | $ | (9,282,953 | ) | $ | 1,022,229 | |||||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
(180,154 | ) | 2,510,633 | 2,155,479 | 3,786,588 | 2,155,479 | ||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive (loss) income
|
$ | (9,861,637 | ) | $ | 2,502,726 | $ | (7,127,474 | ) | $ | 4,808,817 | ||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
$ | 6,528,105 |
Note 3.
Earnings (Loss) per Share
Earnings
per common share are based upon the weighted average number of common and common
equivalent shares outstanding during the period. The only reconciling item in
the calculation of diluted EPS is the dilutive effect of stock options which
were computed using the treasury stock method. During the three and six month
periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company did not issue any stock
options. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company did not have any stock
options that were issued that had a stock price below the average stock price
for the period. Accordingly, there were no other potentially dilutive items at
December 31, 2007 and 2006.
Note 4.
Segment Information
The
Company has two reportable segments, MPC and its wholly owned subsidiary, MPAL.
The Company’s chief operating decision maker is Daniel J. Samela (President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting and Financial Officer) who reviews
the results of the MPC and MPAL businesses on a regular basis. MPC and MPAL both
engage in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur
expenses. MPAL and its subsidiaries are considered one segment. Although there
is discreet information available below the MPAL level, their products and
services, production processes, market distribution and customers are similar in
nature. In addition, MPAL has a management team which focuses on drilling
efforts, capital expenditures and other operational activities.
Segment
information (in thousands) for the Company’s two operating segments is as
follows:
THREE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
|
SIX MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
|
|||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
MPC
|
$ | 31 | $ | — | $ | 91 | $ | 1 | ||||||||
MPAL
|
10,343 | 8,414 | 19,605 | 15,236 | ||||||||||||
Total
consolidated revenues
|
$ | 10,374 | $ | 8,414 | $ | 19,696 | $ | 15,237 | ||||||||
Net
(loss) income:
|
||||||||||||||||
MPC
|
$ | (655 | ) | $ | (432 | ) | $ | (1,144 | ) | $ | (855 | ) | ||||
MPAL
|
(9,026 | ) | 424 | (8,139 | ) | 1,877 | ||||||||||
Consolidated
net (loss) income
|
$ | (9,681 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (9,283 | ) | $ | 1,022 |
Note 5.
Exploration and Dry Hole Costs
These
costs relate primarily to the exploration work being performed on MPAL’s
properties. During the six months ended December 31, 2007, the Company incurred
dry hole costs of $1,505,000 in the Cooper Basin and $125,000 in the Weald Basin
in the United Kingdom.
7
Note 6.
Asset Retirement Obligations
A
reconciliation of the Company’s asset retirement obligations for the six months
ended December 31, 2007 was as follows:
Balance
at July 1, 2007
|
$ | 9,456,088 | ||
Liabilities
incurred
|
— | |||
Liabilities
settled
|
— | |||
Accretion
expense
|
346,388 | |||
Revisions
to estimate
|
42,882 | |||
Exchange
effect
|
376,741 | |||
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
$ | 10,222,099 |
Note 7.
Income Taxes
As
previously disclosed, the Australian Taxation Office (“ATO”) conducted an audit
of the Australian income tax returns of MPAL and its wholly owned subsidiaries
for the years 1997- 2005. The ATO audit focused on certain income tax deductions
claimed by Paroo Petroleum Pty. Ltd. (“PPPL”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MPAL
related to the write-off of outstanding loans made by PPPL to other entities
within the MPAL group of companies. As a result of this audit, the ATO in
August, 2007 issued “position papers” which set forth its opinions that these
previous deductions should be disallowed, resulting in additional income taxes
being payable by MPAL and its subsidiaries. In the position papers, the ATO sets
out its legal basis for its conclusions. The ATO indicated in its position
papers that the increase in taxes arising from its proposed positions would be
(Aus) $13,392,460 plus possible interest and penalties, which could have
exceeded the amount of the increased taxes asserted by the ATO.
In a
comprehensive audit conducted by the ATO in the period 1992-94, the ATO
concluded that PPPL was carrying on business as a money lender and accordingly,
should, for taxation purposes, account for its interest income on an accrual
basis rather than a cash basis. MPAL accepted this conclusion and from that
point has been determining its annual Australian taxation liability on this
basis (including claiming deductions for bad debts as a money
lender).
Recently,
the ATO has taken a more aggressive approach with respect to its views regarding
income tax deductions attributable to in-house finance companies. Since this
change in approach, the ATO has commenced audits of a number of companies
involving, among other issues, the appropriate treatment of bad debt deductions
taken by in-house finance companies. Magellan understands that, at this time,
while there have been negotiated settlements in relation to some of these
audits, none of them has reached final resolution in court.
Based
upon the advice of Australian tax counsel, the Company and the ATO held
settlement discussions concerning this matter during this quarter. In order to
avoid a protracted and costly legal battle with the ATO, diversion of company
management and resources away from Company business and the possibility of
significantly higher payments with a loss in court, the Company decided to
settle this matter. On December 19, 2007, MPAL reached a non-binding agreement
in principle to settle this dispute for an aggregate settlement payment by MPAL
to the ATO of (Aus) $14,641,994. The aggregate settlement payment is comprised
of (Aus) $10,340,796 in amended taxes and (Aus) $4,301,198 of interest on the
amended taxes. No penalties were to be assessed as part of the terms of the
settlement. The agreement in principle to settle the dispute was conditioned
upon MPAL and the ATO agreeing on formal terms of settlement in a binding
agreement (the Deed of Settlement) which the parties agreed to negotiate and
sign promptly. As further agreed by the parties, the ATO issued
assessments for the agreed upon amended tax liabilities in January
2008. Under the final terms of the Deed of Settlement signed by the
parties on February 7, 2008, MPAL agreed not to object to or appeal the ATO’s
amended assessments. The Deed of Settlement with the ATO constitutes a complete
release and extinguishment of the tax liabilities of MPAL and its subsidiaries
with respect to the amended assessments and the prior bad debt
deductions.
On
January 21, 2008, MPAL paid (Aus) $5,000,000 to the ATO as a deposit towards
this settlement. The remaining (Aus) $9,641,994 is scheduled to be paid by MPAL
on February 14, 2008.
Both the
amended taxes and interest in the amount of US$12,836,636 has been recorded as
part of the income tax provision for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 ($.31
per share).
The
Company adopted FIN 48 on July 1, 2007. Under FIN 48, a
company recognizes an uncertain tax position (“UTP”) based on whether
it is more likely than not that the UTP will be sustained upon examination by
the appropriate taxing authority, including resolution of any related appeals or
litigation processes, based solely on the technical merits of the position. In
evaluating whether a UTP has met the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold,
a company must presume that its positions will be examined by the appropriate
taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. The second
step of FIN 48 adoption is measurement. A UTP that meets the
more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured to determine the amount
of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The UTP is measured at the
largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being
realized upon ultimate settlement. A UTP is not recognized if it does not meet
the more-likely-than-not threshold.
8
Upon the
adoption of FIN 48, MPAL received a legal opinion from its Australian tax
counsel that concluded that the Company would be more likely than not to sustain
these deductions in court. Australian tax counsel also advised the
Company that 100% of the tax benefit of these deductions is the largest amount
of the benefit that would be more than 50% likely to be realized. As
a result, the Company recorded no liability for this UTP prior to the settlement
which was negotiated in December.
The
components of the income tax (in thousands) between MPC and MPAL are as
follows:
3
MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER
31
|
6
MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER
31
|
|||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
$ | 3,117 | $ | 248 | $ | 3,896 | $ | 1,969 | ||||||||
Tax
at 30%
|
935 | 74 | 1,169 | 591 | ||||||||||||
MPC’s
non Australian loss
|
195 | 129 | 337 | 257 | ||||||||||||
Non-taxable
Australian revenue
|
(162 | ) | (114 | ) | (225 | ) | (199 | ) | ||||||||
Depletion
on step up basis – oil & gas properties
|
— | 165 | 19 | 293 | ||||||||||||
Other
permanent differences
|
10 | 2 | 11 | 5 | ||||||||||||
ATO
assessment of prior year taxes, net of interest expense
benefit
|
11,706 | — | 11,706 | — | ||||||||||||
Increase
in valuation reserve for foreign (UK) exploration
expenditures
|
107 | — | 140 | — | ||||||||||||
Australian
income tax provision
|
12,791 | 256 | 13,157 | 947 | ||||||||||||
MPC
income tax provision(a)
|
7 | — | 22 | — | ||||||||||||
Consolidated
income tax provision
|
$ | 12,798 | $ | 256 | $ | 13,179 | $ | 947 | ||||||||
Current
income tax provision
|
$ | 12,644 | $ | 19 | $ | 12,659 | $ | 889 | ||||||||
Deferred
income tax provision
|
154 | 237 | 520 | 58 | ||||||||||||
Income
tax provision
|
$ | 12,978 | $ | 256 | $ | 13,179 | $ | 947 | ||||||||
Effective
tax rate
|
416 | % | 103 | % | 338 | % | 48 | % |
|
___________
|
(a) MPC’s
income tax provisions represent the 25% Canadian withholding tax on its
Kotaneelee gas field carried interest net proceeds.
The
Company has made a policy election that interest and penalty costs, if incurred,
will be classified as income taxes in the Company’s financial statements. The
tax years that remain open and subject to examination by tax jurisdictions are
fiscal 2004 to present in the United States and fiscal 1996 to present in
Australia except for the issues agreed upon in the Deed of Settlement discussed
above which are now closed.
ITEM 2
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements
included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations which are not historical in nature are intended to be, and
are hereby identified as, forward looking statements for purposes of the “Safe
Harbor” Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
The Company cautions readers that forward looking statements are subject to
certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those indicated in the forward looking statements. The results
reflect fully consolidated financial statements of MPC and MPAL. Among these
risks and uncertainties are the pricing and production levels from the
properties in which the Company has interests and the extent of the recoverable
reserves at those properties. In addition, the Company has a large number of
exploration permits and faces the risk that any wells drilled may fail to
encounter hydrocarbons in commercially recoverable quantities. The Company
undertakes no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements, whether
as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
9
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Oil and
Gas Properties
The
Company follows the successful efforts method of accounting for its oil and gas
operations. Under this method, the costs of successful wells, development dry
holes, productive leases and permit and concession costs are capitalized and
amortized on a units-of-production basis over the life of the related reserves.
Cost centers for amortization purposes are determined on a field-by-field basis.
The Company records its proportionate share in joint venture operations in the
respective classifications of assets, liabilities and expenses. Unproved
properties with significant acquisition costs are periodically assessed for
impairment in value, with any impairment charged to expense. The successful
efforts method also imposes limitations on the carrying or book value of proved
oil and gas properties. Oil and gas properties are reviewed for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts
may not be recoverable. The Company estimates the future undiscounted cash flows
from the affected properties to determine the recoverability of carrying
amounts. In general, analyses are based on proved developed reserves, except in
circumstances where it is probable that additional resources will be developed
and contribute to cash flows in the future. For Mereenie and Palm Valley, proved
developed reserves are limited to contracted quantities. If such contracts are
extended, the proved developed reserves will be increased to the lesser of the
actual proved developed reserves or the contracted quantities.
Exploratory
drilling costs are initially capitalized pending determination of proved
reserves but are charged to expense if no proved reserves are found. Other
exploration costs, including geological and geophysical expenses, leasehold
expiration costs and delay rentals, are expensed as incurred. Because the
Company follows the successful efforts method of accounting, the results of
operations may vary materially from quarter to quarter. An active exploration
program may result in greater exploration and dry hole costs.
Income
Taxes
The
Company follows Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement No. 109,
“Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”), the liability method in accounting
for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of
assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws
that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The Company
records a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets when it is more likely
than not that such assets will not be recovered.
FASB
Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”)
is an interpretation of SFAS 109 and was adopted by the Company July
1, 2007. FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for recognizing, measuring,
presenting, and disclosing in the financial statements uncertain tax positions
that the company has taken or expects to take in its tax returns. Under FIN 48,
the Company is able to recognize a tax position based on whether it is more
likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination,
including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on
the technical merits of the position. In evaluating whether a tax position has
met the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the Company has presumed
that its positions will be examined by the appropriate taxing authority that has
full knowledge of all relevant information. The second step of FIN 48 adoption
is measurement. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition
threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the
financial statements. The tax position is measured at the largest amount of
benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate
settlement. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it does
not meet the more-likely-than-not threshold. To appropriately account
for income tax matters in accordance with SFAS 109 and FIN 48, the Company is
required to make significant judgments and estimates regarding the
recoverability of deferred tax assets, the likelihood of the outcome of
examinations of tax positions that may or may not be currently under review and
potential scenarios involving settlements of such matters. Changes in these
estimates could materially impact the consolidated financial
statements.
Nondepletable
Assets
At
December 31 and June 30, 2007, oil and gas properties include $6.1 million and
$14.8 million, respectively, of capitalized costs that are currently not being
depleted. These amounts consist of $1.7 million and $1.6 million,
respectively, related to PEL 106 in the Cooper Basin which were capitalized
during the year ended June 30, 2006. These amounts remain capitalized
because the related well has sufficient quantity of reserves to justify its
completion as a producing well. Efforts are currently being made to market the
gas from this well. At June 30, 2007, nondepletable assets also include $8.8
million of costs relating to drilling in the Nockatunga field which were
capitalized as exploratory well costs pending the start of
production. Depletion of these costs commenced in the three months
ended September 30, 2007 when production started. In addition, as of
December 31 and June 30, 2007 capitalized costs not currently being depleted
include $4.4 million associated with exploration permits and licenses in
Australia and the U.K. The Company evaluates exploration permits and licenses
annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value may be impaired. The Company estimates the value of these assets
based upon drilling activity, estimated cash flow and commitments.
10
Goodwill
Goodwill
is not amortized. The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually or
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may
be impaired in accordance with methodologies prescribed in SFAS No. 142
“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” The Company estimates future cash flows
to determine if any impairment has occurred. There was no impairment of goodwill
as of December 31 and June 30, 2007.
Asset
Retirement Obligations
SFAS 143,
“Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” requires legal obligations
associated with the retirement of long-lived assets to be recognized at their
fair value at the time that the obligations are incurred. Upon initial
recognition of a liability, that cost is capitalized as part of the related
long-lived asset (oil & gas properties) and amortized on a
units-of-production basis over the life of the related reserves. Accretion
expense in connection with the discounted liability is recognized over the
remaining life of the related reserves.
The
estimated liability is based on the future estimated cost of land reclamation,
plugging the existing oil and gas wells and removing the surface facilities
equipment in the Palm Valley, Mereenie, Nockatunga and the Cooper Basin fields.
The liability is a discounted liability using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate
on the date such liabilities are determined. A market risk premium was excluded
from the estimate of asset retirement obligations because the amount was not
capable of being estimated. Revisions to the liability could occur due to
changes in the estimates of these costs, acquisition of additional properties
and as new wells are drilled.
Estimates
of future asset retirement obligations include significant management judgment
and are based on projected future retirement costs, field life and estimated
costs. Such costs could differ significantly when they are
incurred.
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company recognizes oil and gas revenue (net of royalties) from its
interests in producing wells as oil and gas is produced and sold from those
wells. Oil and gas sold is not significantly different from the Company’s share
of production. Revenues from the purchase, sale and transportation of natural
gas are recognized upon completion of the sale and when transported volumes are
delivered. Other production related revenues are primarily MPAL’s share of gas
pipeline tariff revenues which are recorded at the time of sale. The Company
records pipeline tariff revenues on a gross basis with the revenue included in
other production related revenues and the remittance of such tariffs are
included in production costs. Government sales taxes related to MPAL’s oil and
gas production revenues are collected by MPAL and remitted to the Australian
government. Such amounts are excluded from revenue and expenses. Shipping and
handling costs in connection with such deliveries are included in production
costs. Revenue under carried interest agreements is recorded in the period when
the net proceeds become receivable, measurable and collection is reasonably
assured. The time when the net revenues become receivable and collection is
reasonably assured depends on the terms and conditions of the relevant
agreements and the practices followed by the operator. As a result, net revenues
may lag the production month by one or more months.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS
157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements. This Statement applies under other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the FASB having
previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the
relevant measurement attribute. Accordingly, this Statement does not require any
new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for the Company beginning
July 1, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the
adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 “The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities,” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 provides companies
with an option to report selected financial assets and financial liabilities at
fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option
has been elected are reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date.
SFAS 159 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2008. The Company is
currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 159 on its
consolidated financial statements.
11
Executive
Summary
MPC is
engaged in the sale of oil and gas and the exploration for and development of
oil and gas reserves. MPAL’s major assets are two petroleum production leases
covering the Mereenie oil and gas field (35% working interest), one petroleum
production lease covering the Palm Valley gas field (52% working interest), and
three petroleum production leases covering the Nockatunga oil fields (41%
working interest). Both the Mereenie and Palm Valley fields are located in the
Amadeus Basin in the Northern Territory of Australia. The Nockatunga field is
located in the Cooper Basin in South Australia. Santos Ltd., a publicly owned
Australian company, owns a 48% interest in the Palm Valley field, a 65% interest
in the Mereenie field and a 59% interest in the Nockatunga fields. Since 2006,
MPAL has refocused its exploration activities into two core areas, the Cooper
Basin in onshore Australia and the Weald Basin in the onshore southern United
Kingdom with an emphasis on developing a low to medium risk acreage
portfolio. The Palm Valley Darwin contract expires in January, 2012 and the
Mereenie contracts expire in June, 2009. MPC also has a direct 2.67% carried
interest in the Kotaneelee gas field in the Yukon Territory of
Canada.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL
RESOURCES
Consolidated
At
December 31, 2007, the Company on a consolidated basis had $30,232,678 of cash
and cash equivalents and $3,404,507 of marketable securities.
Net cash
provided by operations was $3,652,975 in 2007 versus $7,883,814 in 2006. The
decrease in cash provided by operations is primarily due to an increase in
accounts receivable of 2,056,623 relating to oil sales from the Nockatunga wells
and a decrease in accounts payable of $2,775,718 due to the payment of Company’s
joint venture liabilities related to the Nockatunga project.
The
Company invested $4,087,063 and $3,291,071 in oil and gas exploration activities
during the six months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The increase was due to a decrease in construction payables and an increase
in the exchange rate discussed below.
As
previously disclosed (See Note 7 to the Financial Statements), the ATO conducted
an audit of the Australian income tax returns of MPAL and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries for the years 1997- 2005. The audit focused on certain income tax
deductions claimed by Paroo Petroleum Pty. Ltd. (“PPPL”), a wholly-owned finance
subsidiary of MPAL, related to the write-off of outstanding loans made by PPPL
to other entities within the MPAL group of companies. As a result of this audit,
the ATO in August 2007 issued “position papers” which set forth its opinions
that these previous deductions should be disallowed, resulting in additional
income taxes being payable by MPAL and its subsidiaries.
Based
upon the advice of Australian tax counsel, the Company and the ATO held
settlement discussions concerning this matter during this quarter. In order to
avoid a protracted and costly legal battle with the ATO, diversion of company
management and resources away from Company business and the possibility of a
higher payment with a loss in court, the Company decided to settle this matter.
On December 21, 2007, MPAL reached an agreement in principle to settle this
dispute for an aggregate settlement payment by MPAL to the ATO of (Aus)
$14,641,994. This is comprised of (Aus) $10,340,796 in amended taxes and (Aus)
$4,301,198 of interest on the amended taxes. No penalties were assessed as part
of this settlement. The agreement in principle to settle the dispute was
conditioned upon MPAL and the ATO agreeing on formal terms of settlement in a
binding agreement (the Deed of Settlement) which the parties agreed to negotiate
and sign promptly. As further agreed by the parties, the ATO issued
assessments for the agreed upon amended tax liabilities in January
2008. Under the final terms of the Deed of Settlement signed by the
parties on February 7, 2008, MPAL agreed not to object to or appeal the ATO’s
amended assessments. The Deed of Settlement with the ATO constitutes a complete
release and extinguishment of the tax liabilities of MPAL and its subsidiaries
with respect to the amended assessments and the prior bad debt
deductions.
On January 21, 2008, MPAL paid (Aus)
$5,000,000 to the ATO as a deposit towards this settlement. The remaining (Aus)
$9,641,994 is scheduled to be paid by MPAL on February 14, 2008.
Effect of
exchange rate changes
The value
of the Australian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar increased 4.0% to $.8767 at
December 31, 2007, compared to a value of $.8433 at June 30, 2007.
As to
MPC
At
December 31, 2007, MPC, on an unconsolidated basis, had working capital of
approximately $2.0 million. Working capital is comprised of current assets less
current liabilities. MPC’s current cash position and its annual MPAL dividend
should be adequate to meet its current and future cash
requirements.
12
As to
MPAL
At
December 31, 2007, MPAL had working capital of approximately $24.9 million. MPAL
has budgeted approximately (Aus) $7.2 million for specific exploration projects
in fiscal year 2008 as compared to (Aus) $2.6 million expended in the six months
ended December 31, 2007. However, the total amount to be expended may vary
depending on when various projects reach the drilling phase. MPAL’s current
contracts for the sale of Palm Valley and Mereenie gas will expire in January,
2012 and June, 2009, respectively. Unless MPAL is able to obtain additional
contracts for its remaining gas reserves or be successful in its current
exploration program, its revenues will be materially reduced after 2009. The
Producers (MPAL and Santos) are actively pursuing gas sales contracts for the
remaining uncontracted reserves at both the Mereenie and Palm Valley gas fields
in the Amadeus Basin. While opportunities exist to contract additional gas sales
in the Northern Territory market after these dates, there is strong competition
within the market and there are no assurances that the Amadeus producers will be
able to contract for the sale of the remaining uncontracted
reserves.
As
previously disclosed, MPAL settled with the ATO for (Aus) $14,641,994 (See
Note 7 to the financial statements). As in the past, MPAL expects to fund its
exploration costs through its cash and cash equivalents and cash flow from
Australian operations. MPAL also expects that it will continue to seek partners
to share its exploration costs. If MPAL’s efforts to find partners are
unsuccessful, it may be unable or unwilling to complete the exploration program
for some of its properties.
OFF
BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The
Company does not use off-balance sheet arrangements such as securitization of
receivables with any unconsolidated entities or other parties. The Company is
exposed to oil and gas market price volatility and uses fixed pricing contracts
with inflation clauses to mitigate this exposure.
The
following is a summary of our consolidated contractual obligations at December
31, 2007:
PAYMENTS DUE BY
PERIOD
|
||||||||||||||||||||
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
|
TOTAL
|
LESS
THAN
1
YEAR
|
1-3 YEARS
|
3-5 YEARS
|
MORE
THAN
5 YEARS
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating
Lease Obligations
|
323,000 | 220,000 | 103,000 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Australian
Tax Office Settlement (see note 7)
|
12,837,000 | 12,837,000 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Purchase
Obligations(1)
|
3,380,000 | 3,380,000 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Asset
Retirement Obligations
|
10,222,000 | 205,000 | 6,324,000 | 1,768,000 | 1,925,000 | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 26,762,000 | $ | 16,642,000 | $ | 6,427,000 | $ | 1,768,000 | 1,925,000 |
|
______________
|
(1)
|
Represents
firm commitments for exploration and capital expenditures. The Company is
committed to these expenditures, however some may be farmed out to third
parties. Exploration contingent expenditures of $15,284,000 which are not
legally binding have been excluded from the table above and based on
exploration decisions would be due as follows: $1,158,000 (less than 1
year), $14,126,000 (1-3 years), $0 (3-5
years).
|
|
|
THREE
MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 VS. DECEMBER 31, 2006
REVENUES
OIL SALES
INCREASED 51% in the 2007 quarter to $4,887,721 from $3,227,393 in 2006 because
of the 43% increase in average price per barrel and the 15.6% increase in the
exchange rate discussed below. Oil unit sales (after deducting royalties) in
barrels (bbls) and the average price per barrel sold during the periods
indicated were as follows:
THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER
31,
|
||||||||||||||||
2007 SALES
|
2006 SALES
|
|||||||||||||||
BBLS
|
AVERAGE
PRICE
A.$ PER BBL
|
BBLS
|
AVERAGE
PRICE
A.$ PER BBL
|
|||||||||||||
Australia:
|
||||||||||||||||
Mereenie
field
|
25,701 | 116.88 | 27,871 | 74.01 | ||||||||||||
Cooper
Basin
|
1,254 | 119.74 | 4,010 | 72.41 | ||||||||||||
Nockatunga
project
|
27,651 | 89.36 | 23,037 | 69.27 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
54,606 | 103.08 | 54,918 | 71.92 |
GAS SALES
INCREASED 6% to $4,772,980 in 2007 from $4,490,952 in 2006 due mostly to a 2%
increase in the average price per mcf and the 15.6% increase in the exchange
rate discussed below partially offset by a 7% decrease in volume.
13
THREE
MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
|
||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
Australia
|
$ | 4,741,510 | $ | 4,490,952 | ||||
Canada
|
31,470 | — | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 4,772,980 | $ | 4,490,952 |
The
volumes in billion cubic feet (bcf) (after deducting royalties) and the average
price of gas per thousand cubic feet (mcf) sold during the periods indicated
were as follows:
THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER
31,
|
||||||||||||||||
2007 SALES
|
2006 SALES
|
|||||||||||||||
A.$
AVERAGE
PRICE PER
|
A.$
AVERAGE
PRICE PER
|
|||||||||||||||
BCF
|
MCF
|
BCF
|
MCF
|
|||||||||||||
Australia:
Palm Valley
|
.340 | 2.21 | .385 | 2.20 | ||||||||||||
Australia:
Mereenie
|
1.180 | 3.63 | 1.250 | 3.57 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
1.520 | 3.30 | 1.635 | 3.24 |
COSTS AND
EXPENSES
PRODUCTION
COSTS INCREASED 40% in 2007 to $2,525,231 from $1,806,267 in 2006. The increase
in 2007 was primarily the result of increased expenditures in the Nockatunga
project due to increased revenues, repairs and maintenance on the Mereenie
project and the 15.6% increase in the exchange rate described
below.
EXPLORATION
AND DRY HOLE COSTS DECREASED 72% to $724,117 in 2007 from $2,541,280 in 2006.
These costs related to the exploration work performed on MPAL’s properties. The
primary reasons for the decrease in 2007 were the decreased drilling costs
related to the Cooper Basin drilling program, partially offset by the 15.6%
increase in the exchange rate described below.
DEPLETION,
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION INCREASED 1% to $2,796,390 in 2007 from $2,762,867
in 2006. This increase was mostly due to the higher book values of MPAL’s oil
and gas properties acquired during fiscal 2006, the 15.6% increase in the
exchange rate described below, partially offset by lower depletion in the
Mereenie and Palm Valley projects due to lower depletable costs.
AUDITING,
ACCOUNTING AND LEGAL EXPENSES INCREASED 117% in 2007 to $321,052 from $148,204
in 2006 due to higher accounting and auditing costs relating to the ATO audit
and settlement and the purchase of the remaining shares of MPAL and the 15.6%
increase in the exchange rate described below.
ACCRETION
EXPENSE INCREASED 31% to $176,180 in 2007 from $134,413 in 2006. This was due
mostly to accretion of the new wells drilled in fiscal 2007 in the Nockatunga
project and the 15.6% increase in the exchange rate described
below.
OTHER
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES INCREASED 20% to $771,732 in 2007 from $644,969 in 2006.
This is due mostly to increased consulting costs related to the ATO audit and
settlement and the 15.6% increase in the exchange rate described
below.
INCOME
TAX PROVISION INCREASED in 2007 to $12,797,866 from $255,471 in 2006. This is
mostly due to the $12,836,636 tax settlement agreed to by MPAL with the ATO
regarding amended assessments for MPAL’s prior years’ Australian taxes. (See
Note 7).
EXCHANGE
EFFECT
THE VALUE
OF THE AUSTRALIAN DOLLAR RELATIVE TO THE U.S. DOLLAR DECREASED TO $.8767 at
December 31, 2007 compared to a value of $.8787 at September 30, 2007. This
resulted in a $180,154 debit to the foreign currency translation adjustments
account for the three months ended December 31, 2007. The average exchange rate
used to translate MPAL’s operations in Australia was $.8899 for the quarter
ended December 31, 2007, which was a 15.6% increase compared to the $.7700 rate
for the quarter ended December 31, 2006.
14
SIX
MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 VS. DECEMBER 31, 2006
REVENUES
OIL SALES
INCREASED 56% in the six months to $9,620,541 from $6,152,907 in 2006 because of
a 23% volume increase due to increased sales in the
Nockatunga project, a 17% increase in the average price per barrel sold and the
13.8 % increase in the exchange rate discussed below. Oil unit sales (after
deducting royalties) in barrels (bbls) and the average price per barrel sold
during the periods indicated were as follows:
SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER
31,
|
||||||||||||||||
2007 SALES
|
2006 SALES
|
|||||||||||||||
BBLS
|
AVERAGE
PRICE
A.$ PER BBL
|
BBLS
|
AVERAGE
PRICE
A.$ PER BBL
|
|||||||||||||
Australia:
|
||||||||||||||||
Mereenie
field
|
50,735 | 103.40 | 52,782 | 81.25 | ||||||||||||
Cooper
Basin
|
3,287 | 103.36 | 11,013 | 85.39 | ||||||||||||
Nockatunga
project
|
62,487 | 83.15 | 31,002 | 73.93 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
116,509 | 92.59 | 94,797 | 79.33 |
GAS SALES
INCREASED 11% to $8,762,164 in 2007 from $7,894,350 in 2006. The increase was
the result of a 5% increase in price per mcf sold and the 13.8% increase in the
exchange rate discussed below partially offset by a 4% decrease in
volume.
SIX MONTHS ENDED
|
||||||||
DECEMBER 31,
|
||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
Australia
|
$ | 8,671,436 | $ | 7,892,882 | ||||
Canada
|
90,728 | 1,468 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 8,762,164 | $ | 7,894,350 |
The
volumes in billion cubic feet (bcf) (after deducting royalties) and the average
price of gas per thousand cubic feet (mcf) sold during the periods indicated
were as follows:
SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER
31,
|
||||||||||||||||
BCF
|
2007
SALES
A.$
AVERAGE
PRICE
PER
MCF
|
BCF
|
2006
SALES
A.$
AVERAGE
PRICE
PER
MCF
|
|||||||||||||
Australia:
Palm Valley
|
.686 | 2.21 | .781 | 2.20 | ||||||||||||
Australia:
Mereenie
|
2.260 | 3.56 | 2.289 | 3.39 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
2.946 | 3.24 | 3.070 | 3.08 |
COSTS AND
EXPENSES
PRODUCTION
COSTS INCREASED 29% IN 2007 to $4,623,257 from $3,597,406 in
2006. The increase in 2007 was primarily the result of increased
expenditures in the Nockatunga project due to increased revenues, repairs and
maintenance on the Mereenie project and the 13.8% increase in the exchange rate
described below.
EXPLORATION
AND DRY HOLE COSTS DECREASED 8% to $2,737,591 in 2007 from $2,973,263 in 2006.
These costs related to the exploration work performed on MPAL’s properties. The
primary reason for the decrease in 2007 were the decreased drilling costs
related to the Cooper Basin drilling program, partially offset by the 13.8%
increase in the exchange rate described below.
DEPLETION,
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION INCREASED 25% to $5,957,646 in 2007 from
$4,764,819 in 2006. This increase was mostly due to the higher book values of
MPAL’s oil and gas properties acquired during fiscal 2006, increased depletion
in the Nockatunga project due to increased production and expenditures, the
13.8% increase in the exchange rate described below, partially offset by lower
depletion in the Mereenie and Palm Valley projects due to lower depletable
costs.
15
AUDITING,
ACCOUNTING AND LEGAL EXPENSES INCREASED 72% in 2007 to $558,103 from $324,009 in
2006 due to higher accounting and auditing costs relating to the ATO audit and
settlement and the purchase of the remaining shares of MPAL and the 13.8%
increase in the exchange rate described below.
ACCRETION
EXPENSE INCREASED 30% to $346,388 in 2007 from $266,179 in 2006. This was due
mostly to accretion of the new wells drilled in fiscal 2007 in the Nockatunga
project and the 13.8% increase in the exchange rate described
below.
OTHER
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES INCREASED 41% to $1,641,645 in 2007 from $1,167,581 in
2006. This is due mostly to increased consulting costs related to the ATO audit
and settlement and the 13.8% increase in the exchange rate described
below.
INCOME
TAX PROVISION INCREASED in 2007 to $13,178,636 from $946,684 in 2006. This is
mostly due to the $12,836,636 tax settlement agreed to by MPAL with the ATO
regarding amended assessments for MPAL’s prior years’ Australian taxes (see Note
7).
EXCHANGE
EFFECT
THE VALUE
OF THE AUSTRALIAN DOLLAR RELATIVE TO THE U.S. DOLLAR INCREASED TO $.8767 at
December 31, 2007 compared to a value of $.8433 at June 30, 2007. This resulted
in a $2,155,479 credit to the foreign currency translation adjustments account
for the six months ended December, 2007. The average exchange rate used to
translate MPAL’s operations in Australia was $.8688 for the six month period
ended December 31, 2007, which was a 13.8% increase compared to the $.7636 rate
for the six month period ended December 31, 2006.
ITEM 3
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
The
Company’s exposure to market risk relates to fluctuations in foreign currency
and world prices for crude oil, as well as market risk related to investment in
marketable securities. At December 31, 2007, the carrying value of our
investments in marketable securities including those classified as cash and cash
equivalents was approximately $33.6 million, which approximates the fair value
of the securities. Since the Company expects to hold the investments to
maturity, the maturity value should be realized. Marketable securities have not
been impacted by the US credit crisis. A 10% change in the Australian foreign
currency rate compared to the U.S. dollar would increase or decrease revenues
and costs and expenses by $1,970,000 and $1,686,000, for the six months ended
December 31, 2007, respectively. For the six month period ended December 31,
2007, oil sales represented approximately 52% of production revenues. Based on
the current six month’s sales volume and revenue, a 10% change in oil price
would increase or decrease oil revenues by $962,000. Gas sales, which
represented approximately 48% of production revenues in the current six months,
are derived primarily from the Palm Valley and Mereenie fields in the Northern
Territory of Australia and the gas prices are set according to long term
contracts that are subject to changes in the Australian Consumer Price Index
(ACPI) for the six months ended December 31, 2007.
ITEM 4 CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
An
evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the
Company’s management, including Daniel J. Samela, the Company’s President, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) promulgated
under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934) as of December 31, 2007. Based on
this evaluation, the Company’s President concluded that the Company’s disclosure
controls and procedures were effective such that the material information
required to be included in the Company’s SEC reports is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms
relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, and the
information required to be disclosed was accumulated and communicated to
management as appropriate to allow timely decisions for disclosure.
Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting.
There
have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the
Exchange Act) during the six months ended December 31, 2007 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting.
16
MAGELLAN
PETROLEUM CORPORATION
FORM
10-Q
PART II -
OTHER INFORMATION
DECEMBER
31, 2007
ITEM 1
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
As
previously disclosed, the Australian Taxation Office (“ATO”) conducted an audit
of the Australian income tax returns of MPAL and its wholly owned subsidiaries
for the years 1997- 2005. The ATO audit focused on certain income tax deductions
claimed by Paroo Petroleum Pty. Ltd. (“PPPL”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MPAL
related to the write-off of outstanding loans made by PPPL to other entities
within the MPAL group of companies. As a result of this audit, the ATO in
August, 2007 issued “position papers” which set forth its opinions that these
previous deductions should be disallowed, resulting in additional income taxes
being payable by MPAL and its subsidiaries. In the position papers, the ATO sets
out its legal basis for its conclusions. The ATO indicated in its position
papers that the increase in taxes arising from its proposed positions would be
(Aus) $13,392,460, plus possible interest and penalties, which could be
substantial and exceed the amount of the increased taxes asserted by the
ATO.
In a
comprehensive audit conducted by the ATO in the period 1992-94, the ATO
concluded that PPPL was carrying on business as a money lender and accordingly,
should, for taxation purposes, account for its interest income on an accrual
basis rather than a cash basis. MPAL accepted this conclusion and from that
point has been determining its annual Australian taxation liability on this
basis (including claiming deductions for bad debts as a money
lender).
Recently,
the ATO has taken a more aggressive approach with respect to its views regarding
income tax deductions attributable to in-house finance companies. Since this
change in approach, the ATO has commenced audits of a number of companies
involving, among other issues, the appropriate treatment of bad debt deductions
taken by in-house finance companies. Magellan understands that, at this time,
while there have been negotiated settlements in relation to some of these
audits, none of them has reached final resolution in court.
Based
upon the advice of Australian tax counsel, the Company and the ATO held
settlement discussions concerning this matter during this quarter. In order to
avoid a protracted and costly legal battle with the ATO, diversion of company
management and resources away from Company business and the possibility of
significantly higher payments with a loss in court, the Company decided to
settle this matter. On December 19, 2007, MPAL reached a non-binding agreement
in principle to settle this dispute for an aggregate settlement payment by MPAL
to the ATO of (Aus) $14,641,994. The aggregate settlement payment is comprised
of (Aus) $10,340,796 in amended taxes and (Aus) $4,301,198 of interest on the
amended taxes. No penalties were to be assessed as part of the terms of the
settlement. The agreement in principle to settle the dispute was conditioned
upon MPAL and the ATO agreeing on formal terms of settlement in a binding
agreement (the Deed of Settlement) which the parties agreed to negotiate and
sign promptly. As further agreed by the parties, the ATO issued
assessments for the agreed upon amended tax liabilities in January
2008. Under the final terms of the Deed of Settlement signed by the
parties on February 7, 2008, MPAL agreed not to object to or appeal the ATO’s
amended assessments. The Deed of Settlement with the ATO constitutes a complete
release and extinguishment of the tax liabilities of MPAL and its subsidiaries
with respect to the amended assessments and the prior bad debt
deductions.
On
January 21, 2008, MPAL paid (Aus) $5,000,000 to the ATO as a deposit towards
this settlement. The remaining (Aus) $9,641,994 is scheduled to be paid by
MPAL on February 14, 2008.
ITEM 2
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The
following schedule sets forth the number of shares that the Company has
repurchased under any of its repurchase plans for the stated periods, the cost
per share of such repurchases and the number of shares that may yet be
repurchased under the plans:
Period
|
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
|
Average
Price
Paid
per Share
|
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plan( 1)
|
Maximum
Number of
Shares
that May
Yet
Be Purchased
Under Plan
|
||||||||||||
October
1-31, 2007
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 319,150 | ||||||||||||
November
1-30, 2007
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 319,150 | ||||||||||||
December
1-31, 2007
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 319,150 |
___________
(1)
|
The Company through its stock
repurchase plan may purchase up to one million shares of its common stock
in the open market. Through December 31, 2007, the Company had purchased
680,850 of its shares at an average price of $1.01 per share or a total
cost of approximately $686,000, all of which shares have been
cancelled.
|
17
|
ITEM
4 SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY
HOLDERS
|
(a) On
December 6, 2007, the Company held its 2007 Annual General Meeting of
Stockholders.
(b) The following directors were
elected as directors of the Company. The vote was as
follows:
Shares
|
Stockholders
|
|||||||||||||||
For
|
Withheld
|
For
|
Withheld
|
|||||||||||||
Ronald
Pettirossi
|
27,219,195 | 636,582 | 1,162 | 177 | ||||||||||||
Walter
McCann
|
27,405,687 | 617,090 | 1,156 | 183 |
(c) The
firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP was appointed as the Company’s independent
auditors for the year ending June 30, 2008. The vote was as
follows:
Shares
|
Stockholders
|
|||||||
For
|
30,460,136 | 1,203 | ||||||
Against
|
2,674,587 | 68 | ||||||
Abstain
|
442,317 | 68 |
(d)
Authorization to amend the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation and
implement a reverse stock split was approved. The vote was as
follows:
Shares
|
Stockholders
|
|||||||
For
|
25,047,321 | 940 | ||||||
Against
|
8,255,591 | 297 | ||||||
Abstain
|
274,120 | 102 |
ITEM 5
OTHER EVENTS
On
October 24, 2007, the Board of Directors of the Company amended the Company’s
1998 Stock Option Plan to substantive and procedural requirements of Section
409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. A copy of the
First Amendment is attached to this Form 10-Q as Exhibit 10.1.
As
discussed in Note 7 above, the Company reported on February 7, 2008 that MPAL
reached an agreement to settle an ongoing income tax dispute between MPAL and
the ATO for an aggregate settlement payment by MPAL to the ATO of (Aus) $14.6
million. The dispute concerned certain income tax deductions claimed by Paroo
Petroleum Pty. Ltd. (“PPPL”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MPAL, related to the
write-off of outstanding loans made by PPPL to other entities within the MPAL
group of companies. MPAL and the ATO entered into a Deed of
Settlement dated February 7, 2008 concerning this matter. A copy of
the Deed of Settlement is attached hereto as Exhibit 10.2.
ITEM 6
EXHIBITS
10.1 First
Amendment to the Company’s 1998 Stock Option Plan, dated as of October 24, 2007
filed herein.
10.2
|
Deed
of Settlement between Magellan Petroleum Australia Limited, Magellan
Petroleum (N.T.) Pty LTD, Paroo Petroleum Pty Ltd
and the Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia dated
February 7, 2008 filed herein.
|
31.
|
Rule 13a-14(a)
Certifications.
|
Certification
of Daniel J. Samela, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial and
Accounting Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 is filed herein.
32.
|
Section 1350
Certifications.
|
Certification
of Daniel J. Samela, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial and
Accounting Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, is filed herein.
18
MAGELLAN
PETROLEUM CORPORATION
FORM
10-Q
DECEMBER
31, 2007
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized:
MAGELLAN
PETROLEUM CORPORATION
Registrant
Date: February 13,
2008 By/s/ Daniel
J. Samela
Daniel J.
Samela, President and Chief Executive Officer,
Chief
Financial and Accounting Officer
19