TENAX THERAPEUTICS, INC. - Quarter Report: 2017 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
☒
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED June 30, 2017
OR
☐
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM
TO
Commission File Number 001-34600
TENAX THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
26-2593535
|
(State of incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
ONE Copley Parkway, Suite 490, Morrisville, North Carolina
27560
(Address of principal executive offices)
(919) 855-2100
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area
code)
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes ☒
No ☐
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted
on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File
required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes ☒ No
☐
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting
company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of
“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated
filer,” “smaller reporting company” and
“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated filer
|
☐
|
|
Accelerated filer
|
☒
|
Non-Accelerated filer
|
☐
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company
|
☒
|
Emerging growth company
|
☐
|
|
|
|
If an
emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant
has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
☐ No ☒
As of
August 4, 2017, the registrant had outstanding 28,236,546 shares of
Common Stock.
|
|
PAGE
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2017
(Unaudited) and December 31, 2016
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss (Unaudited)
for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and
2016
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
|
6
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
|
16
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
|
24
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
24
|
|
|
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
25
|
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors
|
25
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
|
25
|
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
Exhibits
|
25
|
2
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TENAX THERAPEUTICS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
June 30,
2017
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$2,233,686
|
$9,995,955
|
Marketable
securities
|
6,562,654
|
3,284,616
|
Accounts
receivable
|
24,649
|
72,599
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
176,326
|
275,005
|
Total
current assets
|
8,997,315
|
13,628,175
|
Marketable
securities
|
3,329,977
|
8,586,110
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
14,921
|
19,105
|
Other
assets
|
1,106,785
|
1,106,785
|
Total
assets
|
$13,448,998
|
$23,340,175
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$434,195
|
$727,599
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
1,676,754
|
5,245,546
|
Warrant
liabilities
|
72,157
|
226,092
|
Total
current liabilities
|
2,183,106
|
6,199,237
|
Total
liabilities
|
2,183,106
|
6,199,237
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies; see Note 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity
|
|
|
Common
stock, par value $.0001 per share; authorized 400,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 28,236,546 and 28,120,021,
respectively
|
2,824
|
2,812
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
222,193,941
|
221,816,447
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(9,515)
|
(18,718)
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(210,921,358)
|
(204,659,603)
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
11,265,892
|
17,140,938
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$13,448,998
|
$23,340,175
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
TENAX THERAPEUTICS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE
LOSS
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
||
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
$1,791,436
|
$1,239,644
|
$3,238,890
|
$3,001,339
|
Research
and development
|
1,222,933
|
3,431,591
|
3,274,365
|
7,375,225
|
Total
operating expenses
|
3,014,369
|
4,671,235
|
6,513,255
|
10,376,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
operating loss
|
3,014,369
|
4,671,235
|
6,513,255
|
10,376,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income
|
(28,199)
|
(30,027)
|
(251,500)
|
(373,696)
|
Net
loss
|
$2,986,170
|
$4,641,208
|
$6,261,755
|
$10,002,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
gain on marketable securities
|
(2,660)
|
(78,073)
|
(9,203)
|
(218,309)
|
Total
comprehensive loss
|
$2,983,510
|
$4,563,135
|
$6,252,552
|
$9,784,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss per share, basic and diluted
|
$(0.11)
|
$(0.17)
|
$(0.22)
|
$(0.36)
|
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding, basic and
diluted
|
28,236,495
|
28,119,796
|
28,188,228
|
28,119,772
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
TENAX THERAPEUTICS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
Net
Loss
|
$(6,261,755)
|
$(10,002,868)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
7,456
|
9,711
|
Issuance
and vesting of compensatory stock options and warrants
|
297,981
|
255,002
|
Issuance
of common stock as compensation
|
79,525
|
573
|
Change
in the fair value of warrants
|
(153,935)
|
(153,935)
|
Amortization
of premium on marketable securities
|
113,781
|
428,269
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets
|
146,629
|
147,910
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
(3,862,196)
|
829,979
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(9,632,514)
|
(8,485,359)
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
Purchase
of marketable securities
|
(299,172)
|
(7,255,578)
|
Sale
of marketable securities
|
2,172,689
|
14,011,393
|
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(3,272)
|
(2,884)
|
Net
cash provided by investing activities
|
1,870,245
|
6,752,931
|
|
|
|
Net
change in cash and cash equivalents
|
(7,762,269)
|
(1,732,428)
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
9,995,955
|
3,660,453
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$2,233,686
|
$1,928,025
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
TENAX THERAPEUTICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Tenax
Therapeutics, Inc. (the ?Company?) was originally formed as a New
Jersey corporation in 1967 under the name Rudmer, David?&
Associates, Inc., and subsequently changed its name to Synthetic
Blood International, Inc. On June?17, 2008, the stockholders of
Synthetic Blood International approved the Agreement and Plan of
Merger dated April?28, 2008, between Synthetic Blood International
and Oxygen Biotherapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation. Oxygen
Biotherapeutics was formed on April?17, 2008 by Synthetic Blood
International to participate in the merger for the purpose of
changing the state of domicile of Synthetic Blood International
from New Jersey to Delaware. Certificates of Merger were filed with
the states of New Jersey and Delaware and the merger was effective
June?30, 2008. Under the Plan of Merger, Oxygen Biotherapeutics was
the surviving corporation and each share of Synthetic Blood
International common stock outstanding on June?30, 2008 was
converted to one share of Oxygen Biotherapeutics common stock. On
September 19, 2014, the Company changed its name to Tenax
Therapeutics, Inc.
On October 18, 2013, the Company created a wholly owned subsidiary,
Life Newco, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Life
Newco”), to acquire certain assets of Phyxius Pharma, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (“Phyxius”) pursuant to an Asset
Purchase Agreement, dated October 21, 2013 (the “Asset
Purchase Agreement”), by and among the Company, Life Newco,
Phyxius and the stockholders of Phyxius (the “Phyxius
Stockholders”). As further discussed in Note 6 below, on
November 13, 2013, under the terms and subject to the conditions of
the Asset Purchase Agreement, Life Newco acquired certain assets,
including a license granting Life Newco an exclusive, sublicensable
right to develop and commercialize pharmaceutical products
containing levosimendan, 2.5 mg/ml concentrate for solution for
infusion / 5ml vial in the United States and
Canada.
NOTE 2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal and
recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of these
financial statements. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at
December 31, 2016 has been derived from the Company’s audited
consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016. Certain footnote
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”) rules and regulations. Operating results for
the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017 are not
necessarily indicative of results for the full year or any other
future periods. As such, it is suggested that these condensed
consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2016.
Use of Estimates
In
preparing the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements, management is required to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the dates of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates
and the operating results for the interim periods presented are not
necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full
year.
On an
ongoing basis, management reviews its estimates to ensure that
these estimates appropriately reflect changes in the
Company’s business and new information as it becomes
available. If historical experience and other factors used by
management to make these estimates do not reasonably reflect future
activity, the Company’s results of operations and financial
position could be materially impacted.
Principles of Consolidation
The
accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements include the accounts and
transactions of the Company and Life
Newco, Inc. All material intercompany transactions and balances
have been eliminated in consolidation.
6
Goodwill
Acquired
businesses are accounted for using the acquisition method of
accounting, which requires that assets acquired, including
identifiable intangible assets, and liabilities assumed be recorded
at fair value, with limited exceptions. Any excess of the purchase
price over the fair value of the net assets acquired is recorded as
goodwill. If the acquired net assets do not constitute a business,
the transaction is accounted for as an asset acquisition and no
goodwill is recognized.
Liquidity and Management’s Plan
At June 30, 2017, the Company had cash and cash equivalents,
including the fair value of its marketable securities, of
approximately $12.1 million. The Company used $9.6 million of cash
for operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2017
and had stockholders’ equity of $11.3 million, versus $17.1
million at December 31, 2016.
The
Company expects to continue to incur expenses related to
development of levosimendan for heart failure and other potential
indications, as well as identifying and developing other potential
product candidates. Based on its resources at June 30, 2017, the
Company believes that it has sufficient capital to fund its planned
operations through the third quarter of calendar year 2018.
However, the Company will need substantial additional financing in
order to fund its operations beyond such period and thereafter
until it can achieve profitability, if ever. The Company depends on
its ability to raise additional funds through various potential
sources, such as equity and debt financing. The Company will
continue to fund operations from cash on hand and through sources
of capital similar to those previously described. The Company
cannot assure that it will be able to secure such additional
financing, or if available, that it will be sufficient to meet its
needs.
To the extent that the Company raises additional funds by issuing
shares of its common stock or other securities convertible or
exchangeable for shares of common stock, stockholders will
experience dilution, which may be significant. In the event the
Company raises additional capital through debt financings, the
Company may incur significant interest expense and become subject
to covenants in the related transaction documentation that may
affect the manner in which the Company conducts its business. To
the extent that the Company raises additional funds through
collaboration and licensing arrangements, it may be necessary to
relinquish some rights to its technologies or product candidates,
or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to the
Company. Any or all of the foregoing may have a material adverse
effect on the Company’s business and financial
performance.
Net Loss per Share
Basic
loss per share, which excludes antidilutive securities, is computed
by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding for that particular period. In contrast, diluted
loss per share considers the potential dilution that could occur
from other equity instruments that would increase the total number
of outstanding shares of common stock. Such amounts include shares
potentially issuable under outstanding options, restricted stock
and warrants.
The
following outstanding options, warrants and restricted stock were
excluded from the computation of basic and diluted net loss per
share for the periods presented because including them would have
had an anti-dilutive effect.
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Options
to purchase common stock
|
4,292,088
|
4,092,698
|
Warrants
to purchase common stock
|
2,415,268
|
2,571,582
|
Restricted
stock
|
-
|
520
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July
2017, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (the “FASB”), issued a new
accounting standard that change the classification analysis of
certain equity-linked financial instruments (or embedded features)
with down round features. When determining whether certain
financial instruments should be classified as liabilities or equity
instruments, a down round feature no longer precludes equity
classification when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to
an entity’s own stock. The amendments also clarify existing
disclosure requirements for equity-classified instruments. As a
result, a freestanding equity-linked financial instrument (or
embedded conversion option) no longer would be accounted for as a
derivative liability at fair value as a result of the existence of
a down round feature. The new standard will be effective for the
Company on January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted, including
adoption in an interim period. The Company is currently evaluating
the effect that the standard will have on its condensed
consolidated financial statements and related
disclosures.
In
January 2017, the FASB issued a new accounting standard that
provides guidance for evaluating whether transactions should be
accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or
businesses. The guidance provides a screen to determine when an
integrated set of assets and activities, or a set, does not qualify
to be a business. The screen requires that when substantially all
of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is
concentrated in an identifiable asset or a group of similar
identifiable assets, the set is not a business. If the screen is
not met, the guidance requires a set to be considered a business to
include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that
together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs
and removes the evaluation as to whether a market participant could
replace the missing elements. The new standard will be effective
for the Company on January 1, 2018 and will be adopted on a
prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is
currently evaluating the effect that the standard will have on its
condensed consolidated financial statements and related
disclosures.
7
In
August 2016, the FASB issued a new accounting standard that
clarifies how companies present and classify certain cash receipts
and cash payments in the statement of cash flows where diversity in
practice exists. The new standard is effective for the Company in
its first quarter of fiscal 2018 and earlier adoption is permitted.
The Company does not believe that adopting this updated standard
will have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial
statements and related disclosures.
In June
2016, the FASB issued a new
accounting standard that amends how credit losses are measured and
reported for certain financial instruments that are not accounted
for at fair value through net income. This new standard will
require that credit losses be presented as an allowance rather than
as a write-down for available-for-sale debt securities and will be
effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted, but not
earlier than annual reporting periods beginning January 1,
2019. A modified retrospective approach is to be used for certain
parts of this guidance, while other parts of the guidance are to be
applied using a prospective approach. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact that this new standard will have on its
condensed consolidated financial
statements and related disclosures.
In May 2014, the FASB issued a new accounting standard that
supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under
GAAP. The new standard is principles-based and provides a five-step
model to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The core
principle of the new standard is that revenue should be recognized
when a company transfers promised goods or services to customers in
an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company
expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In
March 2016, the FASB issued a new standard to clarify the
implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations,
and in April 2016, the FASB issued a new standard to clarify the
implementation guidance on identifying performance obligations and
licensing. The new standard also
requires disclosure of qualitative and quantitative information
surrounding the amount, nature, timing and uncertainty of revenues
and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. In July 2015,
the FASB agreed to defer the effective date of the standard from
annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, to annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2017. Early application prior to the
original effective date is not permitted. The standard permits the
use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition
method. The Company does not believe adoption of this standard will
have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial
statements and related disclosures.
In February 2016, the FASB issued a new accounting standard
intended to improve financial reporting regarding leasing
transactions. The new standard will require the Company to
recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the
rights and obligations created by all leased assets. The new
standard will also require it to provide enhanced disclosures
designed to enable users of financial statements to understand the
amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from all
leases, operating and capital, with lease terms greater than 12
months. The new standard is effective for financial statements
beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those
annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact that this new standard will have on
its condensed consolidated financial statements and related
disclosures.
In January 2016, the FASB issued a new accounting standard that
will enhance the Company’s reporting for financial
instruments. The new standard is effective for financial statements
issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and
interim periods within those annual periods. Earlier adoption is
permitted for interim and annual reporting periods as of the
beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Company does not
believe the adoption of this standard will have a material impact
on its condensed consolidated financial statements.
NOTE
3: FAIR VALUE
The
Company determines the fair value of its financial assets and
liabilities in accordance with the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (“ASC”) 820 Fair Value Measurements. The
Company's balance sheet includes the following financial
instruments: cash and cash equivalents, investments in marketable
securities, short-term notes payable, and warrant liabilities. The
Company considers the carrying amount of its cash and cash
equivalents and short-term notes payable to approximate fair value
due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
Accounting
for fair value measurements involves a single definition of fair
value, along with a conceptual framework to measure fair value,
with a fair value defined as “the price that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement
date.” The fair value measurement hierarchy consists of three
levels:
Level
one
|
Quoted
market prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities;
|
Level
two
|
Inputs
other than level one inputs that are either directly or indirectly
observable; and
|
Level
three
|
Unobservable
inputs developed using estimates and assumptions; which are
developed by the reporting entity and reflect those assumptions
that a market participant would use.
|
8
The
Company applies valuation techniques that (1) place greater
reliance on observable inputs and less reliance on unobservable
inputs and (2) are consistent with the market approach, the
income approach and/or the cost approach, and include enhanced
disclosures of fair value measurements in the Company’s
condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Investments in Marketable Securities
The
Company classifies all of its investments as available-for-sale.
Unrealized gains and losses on investments are recognized in
comprehensive income/(loss), unless an unrealized loss is
considered to be other than temporary, in which case the unrealized
loss is charged to operations. The Company periodically reviews its
investments for other than temporary declines in fair value below
cost basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The
Company believes the individual unrealized losses represent
temporary declines primarily resulting from interest rate changes.
Realized gains and losses are reflected in interest and other
income in the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss and are determined
using the specific identification method with transactions recorded
on a settlement date basis. Investments with original maturities at
date of purchase beyond three months and which mature at or less
than 12 months from the balance sheet date are classified as
current. Investments with a maturity beyond 12 months from the
balance sheet date are classified as long-term. At June 30, 2017,
the Company believes that the costs of its investments are
recoverable in all material respects.
The
following table summarize the fair value of the Company’s
investments by type. The estimated fair value of the
Company’s fixed income investments is classified as Level 2
in the fair value hierarchy as defined in U.S. GAAP. These fair
values are obtained from independent pricing services which utilize
Level 2 inputs:
|
June 30, 2017
|
||||
|
Amortized Cost
|
Accrued Interest
|
Gross Unrealized Gains
|
Gross Unrealized Losses
|
Estimated Fair Value
|
Corporate
debt securities
|
$9,819,152
|
$82,994
|
$6,034
|
$(15,549)
|
$9,892,631
|
The
following table summarizes the scheduled maturity for the
Company’s investments at June 30, 2017 and December 31,
2016.
|
June 30,
2017
|
December 31,
2016
|
Maturing
in one year or less
|
$6,562,654
|
$3,284,616
|
Maturing
after one year through three years
|
3,329,977
|
8,586,110
|
Total
investments
|
$9,892,631
|
$11,870,726
|
Warrant liability
On July 23, 2013, the Company issued common stock warrants in
connection with the issuance of Series C 8% Preferred Stock (the
“Series C Warrants”). These Series C Warrants
contain certain
“down-round” price protection clauses and in accordance
with ASC 815-40-35-9, the
Company classifies these warrants as a current liability and the
subsequent changes in fair value are recorded as a component of
other expense.
Financial
assets or liabilities are considered Level 3 when their fair
values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow
methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant
model assumption or input is unobservable. The Series C Warrants
are measured using the Monte Carlo valuation model which is based,
in part, upon inputs for which there is little or no observable
market data, requiring the Company to develop its own
assumptions. The assumptions used in calculating the
estimated fair value of the warrants represent the Company’s
best estimates; however, these estimates involve inherent
uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As
a result, if factors change and different assumptions are used, the
warrant liabilities and the change in estimated fair value of the
warrants could be materially different.
Inherent
in the Monte Carlo valuation model are assumptions related to
expected stock-price volatility, expected life, risk-free interest
rate and dividend yield. The Company estimates the volatility
of its common stock based on historical volatility that matches the
expected remaining life of the warrants. The risk-free
interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury zero-coupon yield curve
on the grant date for a maturity similar to the expected remaining
life of the warrants. The expected life of the warrants is
assumed to be equivalent to their remaining contractual term.
The dividend rate is based on the historical rate, which the
Company anticipates to remain at zero.
9
The
Monte Carlo model is used for the Series C Warrants to
appropriately value the potential future exercise price adjustments
triggered by the anti-dilution provisions. This requires Level 3
inputs which are based on the Company’s estimates of the
probability and timing of potential future financings and
fundamental transactions. The other assumptions used by the
Company are summarized in the following table for the Series C
Warrants that were outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31,
2016
Series C Warrants
|
June 30,
2017
|
December 31,
2016
|
Closing
stock price
|
$0.74
|
$1.95
|
Expected
dividend rate
|
0%
|
0%
|
Expected
stock price volatility
|
83.20%
|
79.60%
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
1.39%
|
1.35%
|
Expected
life (years)
|
2.06
|
2.56
|
As of June 30, 2017, the fair value of the warrant liability was
$72,157. The Company recorded a loss of $16,837 and a gain of
$153,935 for the change in fair value as a component of other
income on the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive
loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,
respectively.
As of
June 30, 2017, there were 240,523 Series C Warrants
outstanding.
The
following tables summarize information regarding assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June
30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
||
|
Balance as of
June 30,
2017
|
Quoted prices in Active Markets for Identical Securities
(Level 1)
|
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
|
Current
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$2,233,686
|
$2,233,686
|
$-
|
$-
|
Marketable
securities
|
$6,562,654
|
$-
|
$6,562,654
|
$-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable
securities
|
$3,329,977
|
$-
|
$3,329,977
|
$-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant
liabilities
|
$72,157
|
$-
|
$-
|
$72,157
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
||
|
Balance as of
December 31,
2016
|
Quoted prices in Active Markets for Identical Securities
(Level 1)
|
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
|
Current
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$9,995,955
|
$9,995,955
|
$-
|
$-
|
Marketable
securities
|
$3,284,616
|
$-
|
$3,284,616
|
$-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable
securities
|
$8,586,110
|
$-
|
$8,586,110
|
$-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant
liabilities
|
$226,092
|
$-
|
$-
|
$226,092
|
There
were no significant transfers between levels in the six months
ended June 30, 2017.
10
NOTE 4. BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS
Property and equipment, net
Property
and equipment consist of the following as of June 30, 2017 and
December 31, 2016:
|
June 30,
2017
|
December 31,
2016
|
Laboratory
equipment
|
$354,861
|
$354,861
|
Computer
equipment and software
|
104,949
|
101,677
|
Office
furniture and fixtures
|
130,192
|
130,192
|
|
590,002
|
586,730
|
Less:
Accumulated depreciation
|
(575,081)
|
(567,625)
|
|
$14,921
|
$19,105
|
Depreciation
expense was approximately $3,000 and $5,000 for the three months
ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $7,000 and $10,000
for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016,
respectively.
Accrued liabilities
Accrued
liabilities consist of the following as of June 30, 2017 and
December 31, 2016:
|
June 30,
2017
|
December 31,
2016
|
Operating
costs
|
$1,607,404
|
$4,361,538
|
Employee
related
|
69,350
|
884,008
|
|
$1,676,754
|
$5,245,546
|
NOTE 5. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The
following table summarizes the Company’s intangible assets as
of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
Asset Category
|
Weighted Average Amortization Period (in Years)
|
Value Assigned
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
Impairments
|
Carrying Value (Net of Impairments and Accumulated
Amortization)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPR&D
|
N/A
|
22,000,000
|
-
|
(22,000,000)
|
-
|
Total
|
|
$22,000,000
|
|
$(22,000,000)
|
$-
|
The
aggregate amortization expense on the above intangibles was $0 for
each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and
2016.
In Process Research and Development
The
levosimendan product in Phase
III clinical trial represents an in process research and
development (“IPR&D”) asset. The IPR&D asset is
a research and development project rather than a product or process
already in service or being sold. Research and development
intangible assets are considered indefinite-lived until the
abandonment or completion of the associated research and
development efforts. If abandoned, the assets would be impaired.
Research and development expenditures that are incurred after the
acquisition, including those for completing the research and
development activities related to the acquired intangible research
and development assets, are generally expensed as
incurred.
11
The
LEVO-CTS trial was completed in December of 2016. Based on the data
from the trial, levosimendan, given
prophylactically prior to cardiac surgery to patients with reduced
left ventricular function, had no effect on the co-primary
outcomes. The study
did not achieve statistically significant reductions in the dual
endpoint of death or use of a mechanical assist device at 30 days,
nor in the quad endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, need for
dialysis, or use of a mechanical assist device at 30 days. Based on
the results of the LEVO-CTS trial, the Company does not anticipate
additional development of levosimendan for the treatment of LCOS
in patients undergoing cardiac
surgery. As of December 31, 2016, the Company determined the
IPR&D asset, and corresponding Goodwill, was more than
temporarily impaired.
During
the quarter ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized an
impairment charge of $33.3 million related to its levosimendan
product in Phase III clinical trial, which represents approximately
$22 million for IPR&D assets and approximately $11.3 million
for goodwill.
NOTE
6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Simdax license agreement
On November 13, 2013, the Company acquired, through its
wholly owned subsidiary, Life Newco, that certain License Agreement (the
“License”), dated September 20, 2013 by and between
Phyxius and Orion Corporation, a global healthcare company
incorporated under the laws of Finland (“Orion”), and
that certain Side Letter, dated October 15, 2013 by and between
Phyxius and Orion. The License grants the Company an exclusive, sublicensable right to develop and
commercialize pharmaceutical products containing levosimendan (the
“Product”) in the United States and Canada (the
“Territory”) from Orion. Pursuant to the
License, the Company must use Orion’s
“Simdax®” trademark to commercialize the
Product. The License also grants to the Company a right
of first refusal to commercialize new developments of the Product,
including developments as to the formulation, presentation, means
of delivery, route of administration, dosage or
indication. Orion’s ongoing role under the License
includes sublicense approval, serving as the sole source of
manufacture, holding a first right to enforce intellectual property
rights in the Territory, and certain regulatory participation
rights. Additionally, the Company must grant back to
Orion a broad non-exclusive license to any patents or clinical
trial data related to the Product developed by the Company under
the License. The License has a fifteen (15) year term,
provided, however, that the License will continue after the end of
the fifteen year term in each country in the Territory until the
expiration of Orion’s patent rights in the Product in such
country.
Pursuant to the terms of the License, the Company paid to Orion a
non-refundable up-front payment in the amount of $1.0
million. The License also includes the following
development milestones for which the Company shall make
non-refundable payments to Orion no later than twenty-eight (28)
days after the occurrence of the applicable milestone event: (i)
$2.0 million upon the grant of FDA approval, including all
registrations, licenses, authorizations and necessary approvals, to
develop and/or commercialize the Product in the United States; and
(ii) $1.0 million upon the grant of regulatory approval for the
Product in Canada. Once commercialized, the Company is obligated to
make certain non-refundable commercialization milestone payments to
Orion, aggregating up to $13.0 million, contingent upon achievement
of certain cumulative net sales amounts in the
Territory. The Company must also pay Orion tiered
royalties based on net sales of the Product in the Territory made
by the Company and its sublicensees. After the end of the term of
the License, the Company must pay Orion a royalty based on net
sales of the Product in the Territory for as long as Life Newco
sells the Product in the Territory.
As of
June 30, 2017, the Company has not met any of the developmental
milestones and, accordingly, has not recorded any liability for the
contingent payments due to Orion.
NOTE 7.
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred Stock
Under
the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, the Board of
Directors is authorized, without further stockholder action, to
provide for the issuance of up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred
stock, par value $0.0001 per share, in one or more series, to
establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in
each such series, and to fix the designation, powers, preferences
and rights of the shares of each such series and the
qualifications, limitations and restrictions thereof. As of June
30, 2017, no shares of preferred stock are designated, issued or
outstanding.
Common Stock
The
Company’s Certificate of Incorporation authorizes it to issue
400,000,000 shares of $0.0001 par value common stock. As of June
30, 2017, there were 28,236,546 shares of common stock issued and
outstanding.
12
Warrants
As of
June 30, 2017, the Company has 2,415,268 warrants outstanding. The
following table summarizes the warrant activity for the six months
ended June 30, 2017:
|
Warrants
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
|
2,415,675
|
$2.64
|
Cancelled
|
(407)
|
123.00
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2017
|
2,415,268
|
$2.62
|
2016 Stock Incentive Plan
In June
2016, the Company adopted the 2016 Stock Incentive Plan (the
“2016 Plan”). Under the 2016 Plan, with the
approval of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors,
the Company may grant stock options, stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares,
performance units, cash-based awards or other stock-based awards.
On June 16, 2016, the Company’s stockholders approved the
2016 Plan and authorized for issuance under the 2016 Plan a total
of 3,000,000 shares of common stock. As of June 30, 2017, no awards
have been granted under the 2016 Plan.
1999 Amended Stock Plan
In
October 2000, the Company adopted the 1999 Stock Plan, as amended
and restated on June 17, 2008 (the “1999 Plan”).
Under the 1999 Plan, with the approval of the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors, the Company may grant stock
options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights and new shares
of common stock upon exercise of stock options. On March 13, 2014,
the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment to the 1999
Plan which increased the number of shares of common stock
authorized for issuance under the 1999 Plan to a total of 4,000,000
shares, up from 300,000 previously authorized. On September 15,
2015, the Company’s stockholders approved an additional
amendment to the 1999 Plan which increased the number of shares of
common stock authorized for issuance under the 1999 Plan to a total
of 5,000,000 shares, up from 4,000,000 previously authorized. As of
June 30, 2017, the Company had 593,865 shares of common stock
available for grant under the 1999 Plan.
The
following table summarizes the shares available for grant under the
1999 Plan for the six months ended June 30, 2017:
|
Shares Available for Grant
|
Balances, at December 31, 2016
|
268,500
|
Options
granted
|
(260,000)
|
Options
cancelled/forfeited
|
701,610
|
Restricted
stock granted
|
(213,420)
|
Restricted
stock cancelled/forfeited
|
97,175
|
Balances, at June 30, 2017
|
593,865
|
1999 Plan Stock Options
Stock
options granted under the 1999 Plan may be either incentive stock
options (“ISOs”), or nonqualified stock options
(“NSOs”). ISOs may be granted only to employees. NSOs
may be granted to employees, consultants and directors. Stock
options under the 1999 Plan may be granted with a term of up to ten
years and at prices no less than fair market value for ISOs and no
less than 85% of the fair market value for NSOs. Stock options
granted generally vest over one to three years.
13
The
following table summarizes the outstanding stock options under the
1999 Plan for the six months ended June 30, 2017:
|
Outstanding Options
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
Balances, at December 31, 2016
|
4,733,698
|
$4.98
|
Options
granted
|
260,000
|
$0.55
|
Options
cancelled
|
(701,610)
|
$4.35
|
Balances, at June 30, 2017
|
4,292,088
|
$4.82
|
The
Company chose the “straight-line” attribution method
for allocating compensation costs of each stock option over the
requisite service period using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing
Model to calculate the grant date fair value.
The Company recorded compensation expense for these stock options
grants of $135,999 and $297,981 for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2017, respectively.
As of
June 30, 2017, there were unrecognized compensation costs of
approximately $609,000 related to non-vested stock option awards
that will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the weighted
average remaining vesting period of 1.8 years. Additionally, there
were unrecognized compensation costs of approximately $5.9 million
related to non-vested stock option awards subject to
performance-based vesting milestones with a weighted average
remaining life of 2.8 years. As of June 30, 2017, none of these
milestones have been achieved.
The
Company used the following assumptions to estimate the fair value
of options granted under its stock option plans for the six months
ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:
|
For the six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Risk-free
interest rate (weighted average)
|
2.19%
|
1.60%
|
Expected
volatility (weighted average)
|
99.59%
|
84.53%
|
Expected
term (in years)
|
7
|
7
|
Expected
dividend yield
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
Risk-Free Interest Rate
|
The
risk-free interest rate assumption was based on U.S. Treasury
instruments with a term that is consistent with the expected term
of the Company’s stock options.
|
Expected Volatility
|
The
expected stock price volatility for the Company’s common
stock was determined by examining the historical volatility and
trading history for its common stock over a term consistent with
the expected term of its options.
|
Expected Term
|
The
expected term of stock options represents the weighted average
period the stock options are expected to remain outstanding. It was
calculated based on the Company’s historical experience with
its stock option grants.
|
Expected Dividend Yield
|
The
expected dividend yield of 0% is based on the Company’s
history and expectation of dividend payouts. The Company has not
paid and does not anticipate paying any dividends in the near
future.
|
Forfeitures
|
Stock
compensation expense recognized in the statements of operations for
the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 is based on awards
ultimately expected to vest, and it has been reduced for estimated
forfeitures. ASC 718 requires forfeitures to be estimated at the
time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if
actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures were
estimated based on the Company’s historical
experience.
|
14
Restricted Stock Grants
The
following table summarizes the restricted stock grants under the
1999 Plan for the six months ended June 30, 2017.
|
Outstanding Restricted Stock Grants
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
|
Balances, at December 31, 2016
|
214
|
$2.72
|
Restricted
stock granted
|
213,420
|
$0.68
|
Restricted
stock vested
|
(116,525)
|
$0.68
|
Restricted
stock cancelled
|
(97,109)
|
$0.68
|
Balances, at June 30, 2017
|
-
|
$-
|
The Company recorded compensation expense for these restricted
stock grants of $98 and $390 for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2017, respectively.
As of
June 30, 2017, there was no unrecognized compensation costs related
to the non-vested restricted stock grants.
Inducement Stock Options
On
February 15, 2015, an employment inducement stock option award for
25,000 shares of common stock
was made to the Company’s former chief medical officer. This
employment inducement stock option was awarded in accordance with
the employment inducement award exemption provided by Nasdaq Rule
5635(c)(4) and was therefore not awarded under the Company’s
stockholder approved equity plan. The option award will vest over a
three-year period, with one-third vesting per year, beginning one
year from the grant date. The options have a 10-year term and an
exercise price of $3.22 per share, the February 13, 2015 closing
price of the Company’s common stock.
The
estimated weighted average fair value per inducement option share
granted was $2.57 in 2015 using
a Black-Scholes option pricing model based on market prices and the
following assumptions at the date of inducement option grant:
weighted average risk-free interest rate of 1.84%, dividend yield of 0%, volatility factor for the
Company’s common stock of 93.90% and a weighted average expected life of 7
years for inducement options not forfeited.
A
summary of the activity and related information for the inducement
stock options follows:
|
Number of Shares
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
Inducement
Stock Options outstanding at December 31, 2016
|
8,334
|
$3.22
|
Options
forfeited or expired
|
(8,334)
|
$3.22
|
Inducement
Stock Options outstanding at June 30, 2017
|
-
|
$-
|
Inducement
stock option compensation expense totaled $1,787 and $4,468 for the
three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $4,468 and
$10,723 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016,
respectively.
At June
30, 2017, there were no
inducement stock options outstanding.
15
ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, or the Exchange Act, which are subject to the “safe
harbor” created by those sections. Forward-looking statements
are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions and on
information currently available to them. In some cases you can
identify forward-looking statements by words such as
“may,” “will,” “should,”
“could,” “would,” “expects,”
“plans,” “anticipates,”
“believes,” “estimates,”
“projects,” “predicts,”
“potential” and similar expressions intended to
identify forward-looking statements. Examples of these statements
include, but are not limited to, statements regarding: the
implications of interim or final results of our clinical trials,
the progress of our research programs, including clinical testing,
the extent to which our issued and pending patents may protect our
products and technology, our ability to identify new product
candidates, the potential of such product candidates to lead to the
development of commercial products, our anticipated timing for
initiation or completion of our clinical trials for any of our
product candidates, our future operating expenses, our future
losses, our future expenditures for research and development, our
ability to raise capital and the sufficiency of our cash resources.
Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated
in these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the
risks faced by us and described in Part II, Item 1A of this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report
on Form 10-K, and our other filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, or SEC. You should not place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date
of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. You should read this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q completely and with the understanding
that our actual future results may be materially different from
those we expect. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation
to update these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of
new information, future events or otherwise.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction
with the unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in
Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and with
the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes
thereto included as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2016.
All references in this Quarterly Report to “Tenax
Therapeutics”, “we”, “our” and
“us” means Tenax Therapeutics, Inc.
Overview
Strategy
We are
a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on identifying,
developing and commercializing drugs for critical care patients.
Our principal business objective is to acquire or discover,
develop, and commercialize novel therapeutic products for disease
indications that represent significant areas of clinical need and
commercial opportunity. Our lead product is levosimendan, which was
acquired in an asset purchase agreement with Phyxius Pharma, Inc.,
or Phyxius. Levosimendan is a calcium sensitizer developed for
intravenous use in hospitalized patients with acutely decompensated
heart failure. The treatment is currently approved in more than 60
countries for this indication.
The
United States Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, has granted
Fast Track status for levosimendan for the reduction of morbidity
and mortality in cardiac surgery patients at risk for developing
Low Cardiac Output Syndrome, or LCOS. In addition, the FDA has
agreed to the Phase III protocol design under Special Protocol
Assessment, or SPA, and provided guidance that a single successful
trial will be sufficient to support approval of levosimendan in
this indication. On January 31, 2017,
we announced top-line results from the Phase III LEVO-CTS trial.
Levosimendan, given prophylactically prior to cardiac surgery to
patients with reduced left ventricular function, had no effect on
the co-primary outcomes. The study did not achieve statistically
significant reductions in the dual endpoint of death or use of a
mechanical assist device at 30 days, nor in the quad endpoint of
death, myocardial infarction, need for dialysis, or use of a
mechanical assist device at 30 days. However, the study results
demonstrated statistically significant reductions in two of three
secondary endpoints including reduction in LCOS and a reduction in
postoperative use of secondary inotropes. Additionally,
levosimendan was found to be safe with no clinically significant
increases in hypotension or cardiac arrhythmias and the clinical
data showed a non-significant numerical reduction in 90-day
mortality.
Notwithstanding the fact that the trial’s primary endpoints
were not statistically significant, and given the statistically
significant reductions in the secondary endpoints, we continue to
believe levosimendan is an effective and safe inotrope to increase
cardiac output in patients at risk for or with perioperative low
cardiac output. Following the announcement of the Phase III
LEVO-CTS top-line results, we held a meeting with the FDA to review
the preliminary trial data and discuss a path forward to file a NDA
for levosimendan. As a follow-up to this meeting, in May 2017, we
participated in a pre-NDA meeting with the FDA to discuss the
possibility of submitting an NDA for levosimendan in two
indications: treatment of patients undergoing coronary artery
bypass grafting (CABG) to reduce the risk of low cardiac output
syndrome (LCOS) and treatment of patients with acute decompensated
heart failure (ADHF) for improvement in symptoms. In July 2017,
both the FDA and Health Canada determined that another trial would
be necessary in order to support the filing of an NDA for
levosimendan. We are currently evaluating clinical, regulatory and
financial options with regard to continued development of the
levosimendan program in the U.S. and Canada.
16
Additionally, our Board of Directors is conducting a comprehensive
review of strategic alternatives focused on maximizing stockholder
value and has formed a strategic committee of three independent
board members to supervise management in this review. We have
engaged Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. as our financial advisor
to assist in the strategic review process; including, but not
limited to a merger, a business combination, or a purchase, license
or other acquisition of assets. This process may not result in any
transaction and we do not intend to disclose additional details
unless and until we determine further disclosure is appropriate or
required.
Second Quarter 2017 Highlights
The
following summarizes certain key financial measures for the three
months ended June 30, 2017:
●
Cash and cash
equivalents, including the fair-value of our marketable securities,
were $12.1 million at June 30, 2017.
●
Our net loss from
operations was $3.0 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2017
compared to $4.7 million for the three months ended June 30,
2016.
●
Net cash used in
operating activities was $5.6 million and $5.2 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016,
respectively.
Opportunities and Trends
As we
focus on the development of our existing products and product
candidates, we also continue to position ourselves to execute upon
licensing and other partnering opportunities. To do so, we will
need to continue to maintain our strategic direction, manage and
deploy our available cash efficiently and strengthen our
collaborative research development and partner
relationships.
During
the remainder of calendar year 2017, we are focused on the
following initiatives:
●
Working with
collaborators and partners to accelerate product development,
reduce our development costs, and broaden our commercialization
capabilities; and
●
Identifying and
acquiring additional products or product candidates.
Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and
Estimates
There
have been no significant changes in critical accounting policies,
as compared to the critical accounting policies described in
“Item 7—Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations— Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies”
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2016.
Financial Overview
Results of Operations- Comparison of the Three Months Ended June
30, 2017 and 2016
General and Administrative Expenses
General
and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation for
executive, finance, legal and administrative personnel, including
stock-based compensation. Other general and administrative expenses
include facility costs not otherwise included in research and
development expenses, legal and accounting services, other
professional services, and consulting fees. General and
administrative expenses and percentage changes for the three months
ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, are as
follows:
17
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
Increase/ (Decrease)
|
% Increase/ (Decrease)
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
Personnel
costs
|
$1,122,467
|
$621,613
|
$500,854
|
81%
|
Legal
and professional fees
|
534,053
|
449,218
|
84,835
|
19%
|
Other
costs
|
94,617
|
130,111
|
(35,494)
|
(27)%
|
Facilities
|
36,132
|
35,317
|
815
|
2%
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
4,167
|
3,385
|
782
|
23%
|
Personnel costs:
Personnel
costs increased approximately $501,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared
to the same period in the prior year. This increase was due
primarily to the severance costs incurred upon the resignation of
our former chief executive officer during the current period as
compared to the same period of the prior year.
Legal and professional fees:
Legal
and professional fees consist of the costs incurred for legal fees,
accounting fees, consulting fees, recruiting costs and investor
relations services, as well as fees paid to our Board of Directors.
Legal and professional fees increased approximately $85,000 for the
three months ended June 30,
2017 compared to the same period in the prior year. This
increase was due primarily to an increase in legal costs incurred
for general corporate matters as compared to the same period in the
prior year.
Other costs:
Other
costs include costs incurred for travel, supplies, insurance and
other miscellaneous charges. The approximately $35,000 decrease in
other costs for the three months ended
June 30, 2017 was due primarily to decreases in costs
incurred for travel and banking fees associated with our
investments in marketable securities as compared to the same period
in the prior year.
Facilities:
Facilities
expenses include costs paid for rent and utilities at our corporate
headquarters in North Carolina. Facilities costs remained
relatively consistent for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.
Depreciation and Amortization:
Depreciation
and amortization costs remained relatively consistent for the three
months ended June 30, 2017 and
2016.
Research and Development
Expenses
Research
and development expenses include, but are not limited to,
(i) expenses incurred under agreements with CROs and
investigative sites, which conduct our clinical trials and a
substantial portion of our pre-clinical studies; (ii) the cost
of manufacturing and supplying clinical trial materials;
(iii) payments to contract service organizations, as well as
consultants; (iv) employee-related expenses, which include
salaries and benefits; and (v) facilities, depreciation and
other allocated expenses, which include direct and allocated
expenses for rent and maintenance of facilities and equipment,
depreciation of leasehold improvements, equipment, laboratory and
other supplies. All research and development expenses are expensed
as incurred. Research and development expenses and percentage
changes for the three months ended
June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, are as
follows:
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
Increase/ (Decrease)
|
% Increase/ (Decrease)
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
Clinical
and preclinical development
|
$1,173,903
|
$3,115,255
|
$(1,941,352)
|
(62)%
|
Consulting
|
2,323
|
174,020
|
(171,697)
|
(99)%
|
Personnel
costs
|
44,847
|
132,225
|
(87,378)
|
(66)%
|
Other
costs
|
1,860
|
10,091
|
(8,231)
|
(82)%
|
18
Clinical and preclinical development:
Clinical
and preclinical development costs include, primarily, the costs
associated with our Phase III clinical trial for levosimendan. The
decrease of approximately $1.9 million in clinical and preclinical
development costs for the three months ended June 30, 2017,
compared to the same period in the prior year, was primarily due to
decreased expenditures for CRO costs to manage the Levo-CTS Phase
III clinical trial. For the three months ended June
30, 2017, we recorded CRO costs of approximately $1.2 million for
the management of the Phase III trial, compared to CRO costs of
$3.1 million, which included approximately $1.6 million in
pass-through site activation and enrolled patient costs, during the
same period in the prior year.
Consulting fees:
Consulting
fees decreased approximately $172,000 for the three months ended
June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year,
primarily due to a decrease in fees paid to a third-party
consulting firm for services provided to improve training and
communication with active sites in support of our Phase III
Levo-CTS clinical trial and contract labor for additional clinical
trial support services in the prior year which were not incurred in
the current period.
Personnel costs:
Personnel
costs decreased approximately $87,000 for the three months ended
June 30, 2017 primarily due to a reduction in headcount in the
current period as compared to the same period in the prior
year.
Other costs:
Other
costs decreased approximately $8,000 for the three months
ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the
same period in the prior year due primarily to a reduction in
travel related costs in the current period.
The
process of conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials
necessary to obtain approval from the FDA is costly and time
consuming. The probability of success for each product candidate
and clinical trial may be affected by a variety of factors,
including, among other things, the quality of the product
candidate’s early clinical data, investment in the program,
competition, manufacturing capabilities and commercial viability.
As a result of the uncertainties discussed above, uncertainty
associated with clinical trial enrollment and risks inherent in the
development process, we are unable to determine the duration and
completion costs of current or future clinical stages of our
product candidates or when, or to what extent, we will generate
revenues from the commercialization and sale of any of our product
candidates. Development timelines, probability of success and
development costs vary widely. We are currently focused on
developing our most advanced product candidate, levosimendan;
however, we will need substantial additional capital in the future
in order to complete the development and potential
commercialization of levosimendan, and to continue with the
development of other potential product candidates.
Other income and expense, net
Other
income and expense includes non-operating income and expense items
not otherwise recorded in our condensed consolidated statement of
comprehensive loss. These items
include, but are not limited to, changes in the fair value of
financial assets and derivative liabilities, interest income earned
and fixed asset disposals. Other income for the three months ended
June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, is as follows:
|
Three
months ended June 30,
|
(Increase)/
Decrease
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
Other
income, net
|
$(28,199)
|
$(30,027)
|
$1,828
|
Other
income decreased approximately $2,000 for the three months ended
June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year. This
decrease is due primarily to the change in fair value of our Series
C warrant derivative liability in the current period and by a
reduction in the interest earned on our investment in marketable
securities.
During the three months ended June 30, 2017, we recorded a
derivative gain of approximately $17,000 which compared to a
derivative gain of approximately $77,000 for the same period in the
prior year. These charges to income are derived from the free
standing Series C warrants which are measured at their fair market
value each period using the Monte Carlo simulation
model.
During
the three months ended June 30, 2017, we recorded interest income
of approximately $43,000 from our investments in marketable
securities. This income is derived from approximately $90,000 in
bond interest paid, partially offset by approximately $47,000 in
charges for amortization of premiums paid and fair-value
adjustments measured each period, which compares to approximately
$273,000 in bond interest paid, partially offset by approximately
$132,000 in charges for amortization of premiums paid and
fair-value adjustments during the same period in the prior
year.
19
Results of Operations- Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30,
2017 and 2016
General and Administrative Expenses
General
and administrative expenses and percentage changes for the six
months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, are as
follows:
|
Six
months ended June 30,
|
Increase/
(Decrease)
|
%
Increase/ (Decrease)
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
Personnel
costs
|
$1,911,280
|
$1,334,948
|
$576,332
|
43%
|
Legal
and professional fees
|
1,039,954
|
1,116,582
|
(76,628)
|
(7)%
|
Other
costs
|
211,490
|
471,723
|
(260,233)
|
(55)%
|
Facilities
|
70,826
|
71,753
|
(927)
|
(1)%
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
5,340
|
6,333
|
(993)
|
(16)%
|
Personnel costs:
Personnel
costs increased approximately $576,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to
the same period in the prior year. This increase was due primarily
to the recognized expense for the vesting of outstanding stock
options and the severance costs incurred upon the resignation of
our former chief executive officer during the current period as
compared to the same period of the prior year.
Legal and professional fees:
Legal
and professional fees decreased approximately $77,000 for the
six months ended June 30, 2017
compared to the same period in the prior year. This decrease was
due primarily to decreases in costs incurred for auditing and
consulting fees, and the vested value of stock option grants to our
Board of Directors, partially offset by an increase in costs
incurred for legal and investor relations services.
Audit and
accounting fees decreased approximately $44,000 in the current
period. This decrease was due primarily to the costs incurred for
the change in our fiscal year, which necessitated the filing of our
audited transitional financial statements in the prior year which
were not incurred in the current period.
Legal fees
increased approximately $16,000 in the current period. This
increase was due primarily to the costs incurred for general
corporate matters as compared to the same period in the prior
year.
Consulting costs
decreased approximately $62,000 in the current period. This
decrease was due primarily to the fees paid to third-party firms
for pre-launch commercialization preparations for LCOS, nationwide
registrations for drug distribution and market analysis and
research for septic shock in the prior year which were not incurred
in the current period.
Costs associated
with investor relations and communication increased approximately
$29,000 in the current period. This increase was due primarily to
fees paid to a third-party investor relations firm providing
marketing and corporate communications services to us in the
current period, which were not incurred in the same period of the
prior year.
Board of Directors
fees decreased in the current period by approximately $25,000. This
decrease was due primarily to a reduction in the recognized expense
for the vesting of stock options awarded in the current period as
compared to the recognized expense for stock options awarded in the
same period of the prior year.
Other costs:
The
approximately $260,000 decrease in other costs for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was due
primarily to an approximately $146,000 decrease in franchise taxes
paid, a reduction of approximately $20,000 in costs incurred for
our sponsorship of the National Sepsis Foundation during the same
period in the prior year, and an overall decrease in travel costs,
supplies expenses, bank fees and other miscellaneous charges in the
current period as compared to the same period in the prior
year.
Facilities:
Facilities
costs remained relatively consistent for the six months
ended June 30, 2017 and
2016.
20
Depreciation and Amortization:
Depreciation
and amortization costs remained relatively consistent for the six
months ended June 30, 2017 and
2016.
Research and Development
Expenses
Research
and development expenses and percentage changes for the
six months ended June 30, 2017 and
2016, respectively, are as follows:
|
Six
months ended June 30,
|
Increase/
(Decrease)
|
%
Increase/ (Decrease)
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
Clinical
and preclinical development
|
$3,003,990
|
$6,649,972
|
$(3,645,982)
|
(55)%
|
Consulting
|
112,935
|
430,324
|
(317,389)
|
(74)%
|
Personnel
costs
|
151,622
|
272,728
|
(121,106)
|
(44)%
|
Other
costs
|
5,818
|
22,201
|
(16,383)
|
(74)%
|
Clinical and preclinical development:
The
decrease of approximately $3.6 million in clinical and preclinical
development costs for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared
to the same period in the prior year, was primarily due to
decreased expenditures for CRO costs to manage the Levo-CTS Phase
III clinical trial. For the six months ended June 30,
2017, we recorded CRO costs of approximately $3.0 million for the
management of the Phase III trial, compared to CRO costs of $6.6
million, which included approximately $3.3 million in pass-through
site activation and enrolled patient costs, during the same period
in the prior year.
Consulting fees:
Consulting
fees decreased approximately $317,000 for the six months ended June
30, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily
due to a decrease in fees paid to a third-party consulting firm for
services provided to improve training and communication with active
sites in support of our Phase III Levo-CTS clinical trial and
contract labor for additional clinical trial support services in
the prior year which were not incurred in the current
period.
Personnel costs:
Personnel
costs decreased approximately $121,000 for the six months ended
June 30, 2017 primarily due to a reduction in headcount in the
current period as compared to the same period in the prior
year.
Other costs:
Other
costs decreased approximately $16,000 for the six months
ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the
same period in the prior year due primarily to a reduction in
travel related costs in the current period.
Other income and expense, net
Other
income for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016,
respectively, is as follows:
|
Six
months ended June 30,
|
(Increase)/
Decrease
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
Other
income
|
$(251,500)
|
$(373,696)
|
$122,196
|
Other
income decreased approximately $122,000 for the six months ended
June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year. This
decrease is due primarily to the change in fair value of our Series
C warrant derivative liability in the current period and a
reduction in the interest earned on our investment in marketable
securities.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2017, we recorded interest income of
approximately $90,000 from our investments in marketable
securities. This income is derived from approximately $203,000 in
bond interest paid, partially offset by approximately $114,000 in
charges for amortization of premiums paid and fair-value
adjustments measured each period, which compares to approximately
$587,000 in bond interest paid, partially offset by approximately
$369,000 in charges for amortization of premiums paid and
fair-value adjustments during the same period in the prior
year.
21
Liquidity, Capital Resources and Plan of Operation
We have
incurred losses since our inception and as of June 30, 2017 we had
an accumulated deficit of approximately $211 million. We will
continue to incur losses until we generate sufficient revenue to
offset our expenses, and we anticipate that we will continue to
incur net losses for at least the next several years. We expect to
incur additional expenses related to our development of
levosimendan as well as identifying and developing other potential
product candidates and, as a result, we will need to generate
significant net product sales, royalty and other revenues to
achieve profitability.
Liquidity
We have
financed our operations since September 1990 through the issuance
of debt and equity securities and loans from stockholders. We had
total current assets of $8,997,315 and $13,628,175 and working
capital of $6,814,209 and $7,428,938 as of June 30, 2017 and
December 31, 2016, respectively. Based on our working capital and
the value of our investments in marketable securities at June 30,
2017, we believe we have sufficient capital to fund our operations
through the third quarter of calendar year 2018.
We
recently completed a Phase III clinical trial for levosimendan.
In July 2017, after presenting data
from the LEVO-CTS trial, both the FDA and Health Canada determined
that another trial would be necessary in order to support the
filing of an NDA for levosimendan. We are currently evaluating
clinical regulatory and financial options with regard to continued
development of the levosimendan program in the U.S. and
Canada. Our ability to continue to pursue testing and
development of levosimendan or other potential products depends on
obtaining license income or outside financial resources. There is
no assurance that we will obtain any license agreement or outside
financing or that we will otherwise succeed in obtaining the
necessary resources.
Our common stock is currently listed on The Nasdaq Capital
Market. In order to maintain this listing, we must satisfy minimum
financial and other requirements. On March 15, 2017, we received a
notification letter from Nasdaq’s Listing Qualifications
Department indicating that we are not in compliance with Nasdaq
Listing Rule 5550(a)(2), because the minimum bid price of our
common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market has closed below $1.00
per share for 30 consecutive business days. In accordance with
Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), we have 180 calendar days,
or until September 11, 2017, to regain compliance with the minimum
$1.00 bid price per share requirement. To regain compliance, any
time before September 11, 2017, the bid price of our common stock
must close at $1.00 per share or more for a minimum of 10
consecutive business days. If we do not regain compliance during
this cure period, we expect that Nasdaq will provide written
notification to us that our common stock will be delisted. At that
time, we may appeal Nasdaq’s delisting determination to a
Nasdaq hearing panel.
We
intend to engage in efforts to regain compliance and thus maintain
our listing. However, there can be no assurance that we will be
able to regain compliance during the applicable time periods set
forth above. If we fail to continue to meet all applicable Nasdaq
Capital Market requirements in the future and Nasdaq determines to
delist our common stock, the delisting could substantially decrease
trading in our common stock; adversely affect the market liquidity
of our common stock as a result of the loss of market efficiencies
associated with Nasdaq and the loss of federal preemption of state
securities laws; adversely affect our ability to obtain financing
on acceptable terms, if at all; and may result in the potential
loss of confidence by investors, suppliers, customers, and
employees and fewer business development opportunities.
Additionally, the market price of our common stock may decline
further and shareholders may lose some or all of their
investment.
Cash Flows
The following table shows a summary of our cash flows for the six
months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:
|
Six
months ended June 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
$(9,632,514)
|
$(8,485,359)
|
Net
cash provided by investing activities
|
1,870,245
|
6,752,931
|
Net cash used in operating activities. Net cash used
in operating activities was approximately $9.6 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2017 compared to net cash used in operating
activities of approximately $8.5 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2016. The increase in cash used for operating activities
was due primarily to a decrease in our accrued costs related to the
Phase III clinical trial for levosimendan.
22
Net cash provided by investing activities. Net cash
provided by investing activities was approximately $1.9 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to approximately $6.8
million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in
cash provided by investing activities was primarily due a reduction
in the sale of marketable securities in the current
period.
Operating Capital and Capital Expenditure Requirements
Our
future capital requirements will depend on many factors that
include, but are not limited to the following:
●
the initiation,
progress, timing and completion of clinical trials for our product
candidates and potential product candidates;
●
the outcome, timing
and cost of regulatory approvals and the regulatory approval
process;
●
delays that may be
caused by changing regulatory requirements;
●
the number of
product candidates that we pursue;
●
the costs involved
in filing and prosecuting patent applications and enforcing and
defending patent claims;
●
the timing and
terms of future in-licensing and out-licensing
transactions;
●
the cost and timing
of establishing sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution
capabilities;
●
the cost of
procuring clinical and commercial supplies of our product
candidates;
●
the extent to which
we acquire or invest in businesses, products or technologies;
and
●
the possible costs
of litigation.
We
believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, along with our
investment in marketable securities, will be sufficient to fund our
projected operating requirements through the third quarter of
calendar year 2018. We will need substantial additional capital in
the future in order to continue the development of levosimendan and
to fund the development and commercialization of other future
product candidates. Until we can generate a sufficient amount of
product revenue, if ever, we expect to finance future cash needs
through public or private equity offerings, debt financings or
corporate collaboration and licensing arrangements. Such funding,
if needed, may not be available on favorable terms, if at all. In
the event we are unable to obtain additional capital, we may delay
or reduce the scope of our current research and development
programs and other expenses.
To the
extent that we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities,
our stockholders may experience additional significant dilution,
and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive
covenants. To the extent that we raise additional funds through
collaboration and licensing arrangements, it may be necessary to
relinquish some rights to our technologies or our product
candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to
us. We may seek to access the public or private capital markets
whenever conditions are favorable, even if we do not have an
immediate need for additional capital.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with GAAP. For information regarding our critical
accounting policies and estimates, please refer to
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations – Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies” contained in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. There have not been
material changes to the critical accounting policies previously
disclosed in that report.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July
2017, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board, or the FASB, issued a new accounting
standard that change the classification analysis of certain
equity-linked financial instruments (or embedded features) with
down round features. When determining whether certain financial
instruments should be classified as liabilities or equity
instruments, a down round feature no longer precludes equity
classification when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to
an entity’s own stock. The amendments also clarify existing
disclosure requirements for equity-classified instruments. As a
result, a freestanding equity-linked financial instrument (or
embedded conversion option) no longer would be accounted for as a
derivative liability at fair value as a result of the existence of
a down round feature. The new standard will be effective for us on
January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in
an interim period. We are currently evaluating the effect that the
standard will have on our condensed consolidated financial
statements and related disclosures.
In
January 2017, the FASB, issued
a new accounting standard that provides guidance for evaluating
whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or
disposals) of assets or businesses. The guidance provides a screen
to determine when an integrated set of assets and activities, or a
set, does not qualify to be a business. The screen requires that
when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets
acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in an identifiable asset
or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a
business. If the screen is not met, the guidance requires a set to
be considered a business to include, at a minimum, an input and a
substantive process that together significantly contribute to the
ability to create outputs and removes the evaluation as to whether
a market participant could replace the missing elements. The new
standard will be effective for us on January 1, 2018 and will be
adopted on a prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. We are
currently evaluating the effect that the standard will have on our
condensed consolidated financial statements and related
disclosures.
In
August 2016, the FASB issued a new accounting standard that
clarifies how companies present and classify certain cash receipts
and cash payments in the statement of cash flows where diversity in
practice exists. The new standard is effective for us in our first
quarter of fiscal 2018 and earlier adoption is permitted. We do not
believe that adopting this updated standard will have a material
impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements and
related disclosures.
In June
2016, the FASB, issued a new
accounting standard that amends how credit losses are measured and
reported for certain financial instruments that are not accounted
for at fair value through net income. This new standard will
require that credit losses be presented as an allowance rather than
as a write-down for available-for-sale debt securities and will be
effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted, but not
earlier than annual reporting periods beginning January 1,
2019. A modified retrospective approach is to be used for certain
parts of this guidance, while other parts of the guidance are to be
applied using a prospective approach. We are currently evaluating
the impact that this new standard will have on our condensed consolidated financial statements and
related disclosures.
23
In May 2014, the FASB issued a new accounting standard that
supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under
GAAP. The new standard is principles-based and provides a five-step
model to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The core
principle of the new standard is that revenue should be recognized
when a company transfers promised goods or services to customers in
an amount that reflects the consideration to which we expect to be
entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In March 2016,
the FASB issued a new standard to clarify the implementation
guidance on principal versus agent considerations, and in April
2016, the FASB issued a new standard to clarify the implementation
guidance on identifying performance obligations and licensing.
The new standard also requires
disclosure of qualitative and quantitative information surrounding
the amount, nature, timing and uncertainty of revenues and cash
flows arising from contracts with customers. In July 2015, the FASB
agreed to defer the effective date of the standard from annual
periods beginning after December 15, 2016, to annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2017. Early application prior to the
original effective date is not permitted. The standard permits the
use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition
method. We do not believe the adoption of this standard will have a
material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements
and related disclosures.
In February 2016, the FASB issued a new accounting standard
intended to improve financial reporting regarding leasing
transactions. The new standard will require us to recognize on our
balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and
obligations created by all leased assets. The new standard will
also require us to provide enhanced disclosures designed to enable
users of financial statements to understand the amount, timing, and
uncertainty of cash flows arising from all leases, operating and
capital, with lease terms greater than 12 months. The new standard
is effective for financial statements beginning after December 15,
2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early
adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that
this new standard will have on our condensed consolidated financial
statements and related disclosures.
In January 2016, the FASB issued a new accounting standard that
will enhance our reporting for financial instruments. The new
standard is effective for financial statements issued for annual
periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods
within those annual periods. Earlier adoption is permitted for
interim and annual reporting periods as of the beginning of the
fiscal year of adoption. We do not believe the adoption of this
standard will have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
Contractual Obligations
There have been no material changes, outside of the ordinary course
of business, to our contractual obligations as previously disclosed
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2016.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Since
our inception, we have not engaged in any off-balance sheet
arrangements, including the use of structured finance, special
purpose entities or variable interest entities.
ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There
have been no material changes to our quantitative and qualitative
disclosures about market risk as compared to the quantitative and
qualitative disclosures about market risk described in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2016.
ITEM 4.
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As
required by paragraph (b) of Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15
promulgated under the Exchange Act, our management, including our
Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
conducted an evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this
report, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e). Based on that evaluation, our Interim Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2017, the end
of the period covered by this report in that they provide
reasonable assurance that the information we are required to
disclose in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods required by the SEC and is accumulated and communicated to
our management, including our Interim Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There
were no significant changes in our internal control over financial
reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting. We routinely
review our internal controls over financial reporting and from time
to time make changes intended to enhance the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting. We will continue to
evaluate the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures and internal controls over financial reporting on an
ongoing basis and will take action as appropriate.
24
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
There
are no material pending legal proceedings to which we are a party
or to which any of our property is subject.
ITEM 1A.
RISK
FACTORS
The
risks we face have not materially changed from those disclosed in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2016, as supplemented by the risks disclosed in our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2017.
ITEM 2.
UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Repurchases of Common Stock
The
following table lists all repurchases during the three months ended
June 30, 2017 of any of our securities registered under Section 12
of the Exchange Act by or on behalf of us or any affiliated
purchaser.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased (1)
|
Average
Price Paid per Share (2)
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or
Programs
|
Approximate
Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or
Programs
|
April
1, 2017 - April 30, 2017
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
May
1, 2017 - May 31, 2017
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
June
1, 2017 - June 30, 2017
|
52
|
$0.65
|
-
|
$-
|
Total
|
52
|
$0.65
|
-
|
$-
|
(1)
Represents shares
repurchased in connection with tax withholding obligations under
the 1999 Amended Stock Plan.
(2)
Represents the
average price paid per share for the shares repurchased in
connection with tax withholding obligations under the 1999 Amended
Stock Plan.
ITEM 6.
EXHIBITS
The
exhibits listed in the accompanying exhibit index are filed as part
of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, and such exhibit index is
incorporated by reference herein.
25
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
TENAX
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
August
9, 2017
|
By:
|
/s/
Michael
B. Jebsen
|
|
|
|
Michael
B. Jebsen
Interim
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial
Officer
(On
behalf of the Registrant and as Principal Executive and Financial
Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
EXHIBIT INDEX
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Separation
and General Release Agreement dated April 7, 2017 between the
Company and John P. Kelley (1)
|
|
|
|
|
Certification
of Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of
2002.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification
of Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL
Instance Document
|
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
(1)
This document was
filed as an exhibit to the current report on Form 8-K filed by
Tenax Therapeutics with the SEC on April 7, 2017, and is
incorporated herein by reference.
*
Filed
herewith
27