TERMINIX GLOBAL HOLDINGS INC - Quarter Report: 2017 June (Form 10-Q)







UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



________________________________________________



FORM 10-Q



________________________________________________





For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017



or



For the transition period from                    to                    



Commission file number 001-36507



________________________________________________



ServiceMaster Global Holdings, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



860 Ridge Lake Boulevard, Memphis, Tennessee 38120

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

901-597-1400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).



The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of July 28, 2017:  133,441,487  shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share 

 

 

---

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS





 

 



---

 



PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION



ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)

(In millions, except per share data)







See accompanying Notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

---

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position (Unaudited)

(In millions, except share data)

                





See accompanying Notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

---

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(In millions)





See accompanying Notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 

---

 

SERVICEMASTER GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

(UNAUDITED)

Note 1. Basis of Presentation 

ServiceMaster Global Holdings, Inc. and its majority-owned subsidiary partnerships, limited liability companies and corporations (collectively, “ServiceMaster,” the “Company,” “we,” “us, and “our”) is a leading provider of essential residential and commercial services. The Company’s services include termite and pest control, home warranties, disaster restoration, janitorial, residential cleaning, cabinet and wood furniture repair and home inspection. The Company provides these services through an extensive service network of company-owned, franchised and licensed locations operating primarily under the following leading brands: Terminix, American Home Shield, ServiceMaster Restore, ServiceMaster Clean, Merry Maids, Furniture Medic and AmeriSpec. All consolidated Company subsidiaries are wholly-owned. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Company recommends that the quarterly unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the SEC (the “2016 Form 10-K”). The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for any interim period are not indicative of the results that might be achieved for a full year.

 



Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies

The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s 2016 Form 10-K. There have been no material changes to the significant accounting policies for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.

Newly Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” to provide a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. This model supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The core principle of the revenue model is that “an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.” Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or modified approach to adopt the guidance. ASU 2014-09 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. To date, the Company has performed the following: A transition team has been established to implement the required changes; an initial assessment of the Company’s revenue streams has been initiated; the Company has substantially completed its inventory of all outstanding contracts; and the Company has begun the process of applying the five-step model to those contracts and revenue streams to evaluate the quantitative and qualitative impacts the new standard will have on its business and reported revenues. The Company plans to adopt the new revenue standard in the first quarter of 2018 utilizing the full retrospective transition method.  The Company does not expect adoption of the new revenue standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” to change how entities measure certain equity investments, to require the disclosure of changes in the fair value of financial liabilities measured under the fair value option that are attributable to a company’s own credit, and to change certain other disclosure requirements. The changes in ASU 2016-01 specifically require that the changes in fair value of all investments in equity securities be recognized in net income. The amendments in ASU 2016-01 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017, and will be adopted prospectively. Upon adoption, changes in fair value of the Company’s available-for-sale securities, which are currently recognized in other comprehensive income, will be recognized in net income.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” which is the final standard on accounting for leases. While both lessees and lessors are affected by the new guidance, the effects on lessees are much more significant. The most significant change for lessees is the requirement under the new guidance to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for all leases not considered short-term leases. Entities are required to use a modified retrospective approach to adopt the guidance. The amendments in ASU 2016-02 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and currently expects that most of the operating lease commitments will be subject to the new standard and recognized as operating lease liabilities and right-of-use assets upon adoption of ASU 2016-02, which will increase the amount of total assets and total liabilities that is reported relative to such amounts prior to adoption.

 [

 

 



---

 

Note 3. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company carries insurance policies on insurable risks at levels that it believes to be appropriate, including workers’ compensation, automobile and general liability risks. The Company purchases insurance policies from third-party insurance carriers, which typically incorporate significant deductibles or self-insured retentions. The Company is responsible for all claims that fall below the retention limits, exceed our coverage limits or are otherwise not covered by our insurance policies. In determining the Company’s accrual for self-insured claims, the Company uses historical claims experience to establish both the current year accrual and the underlying provision for future losses. This actuarially determined provision and related accrual include known claims, as well as incurred but not reported claims. The Company adjusts its estimate of accrued self-insured claims when required to reflect changes based on factors such as changes in health care costs, accident frequency and claim severity.

A reconciliation of beginning and ending accrued self-insured claims, which are included in Accrued liabilities—Self-insured claims and related expenses and Other long-term obligations, primarily self-insured claims on the condensed consolidated statements of financial position, net of insurance recoverables, which are included in Prepaid expenses and other assets and Other assets on the condensed consolidated statements of financial position, is presented as follows:





___________________________________

Accruals for home warranty claims in the American Home Shield business are made based on the Company’s claims experience and actuarial projections. Termite damage claim accruals in the Terminix business are recorded based on both the historical rates of claims incurred within a contract year and the cost per claim. Current activity could differ causing a change in estimates. The Company has certain liabilities with respect to existing or potential claims, lawsuits and other proceedings. The Company accrues for these liabilities when it is probable that future costs will be incurred and such costs can be reasonably estimated. Any resulting adjustments, which could be material, are recorded in the period the adjustments are identified.

In 2008, the Company amended its Profit Sharing and Retirement Plan, a tax qualified 401(k) defined contribution plan available to substantially all of its employees (the “401(k) Plan”), to implement a qualified automatic contribution arrangement (“QACA”) under the safe harbor provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). QACA plans, in general, require automatic enrollment of employees into the retirement plan absent an affirmative election that such employees do not wish to participate. Although the Company implemented processes to auto-enroll new hires after adopting the QACA plan in 2008, it discovered that it did not auto-enroll then existing employees who were not participating in the 401(k) Plan. In response, the Company implemented an auto-enrollment process for affected active employees and submitted to the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) a voluntary correction proposal to remedy the issue for prior years. The Company’s current estimate of the cost of the correction ranges from $25 million to approximately $93 million. The Company has recorded in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income charges of $25 million, of which $1 million was recorded in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. Charges for 401(k) Plan corrective contributions recorded in the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 were less than $1 million. However, there can be no assurances as to the ultimate cost of the correction.

In addition to the matter discussed above and the fumigation related matters discussed below, in the ordinary course of conducting business activities, the Company and its subsidiaries become involved in judicial, administrative and regulatory proceedings involving both private parties and governmental authorities. These proceedings include insured and uninsured matters that are brought on an individual, collective, representative and class action basis, or other proceedings involving regulatory, employment, general and commercial liability, automobile liability, wage and hour, environmental and other matters. The Company has entered into settlement agreements in certain cases, including with respect to putative collective and class actions, which are subject to court or other approvals. If one or more of the Company’s settlements are not finally approved, the Company could have additional or different exposure, which could be material. Subject to the paragraphs below, the Company does not expect any of these proceedings to have a material effect on its reputation, business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows; however, the Company can give no

---

 

assurance that the results of any such proceedings will not materially affect its reputation, business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. 

Fumigation Related Matters

On July 21, 2016, Terminix International USVI, LLC (“TMX USVI”) and The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership (“TMX LP”), each an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a superseding Plea Agreement (the “Superseding Plea Agreement”) in connection with the investigation initiated by the United States Department of Justice Environmental Crimes Section (the “DOJ”) into allegations that a local Terminix branch used methyl bromide as a fumigant at a resort in St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands. The Superseding Plea Agreement was intended to resolve four misdemeanor charges of violations of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act related to improper applications of methyl bromide. Those charges were set forth in an Information, dated March 29, 2016, in the matter styled United States of America v. The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership and Terminix International USVI, LLC.  At a hearing held on August 25, 2016, the United States District Court of the U.S. Virgin Islands (the “District Court”) rejected the Superseding Plea Agreement.  On August 31, 2016, the DOJ requested that the charges be dismissed, reserving its right to re-file the charges, in light of ongoing discussions to resolve the matter. The District Court granted that request, and the March 29, 2016 Information was dismissed. 

On January 20, 2017, TMX USVI and TMX LP entered into a new Plea Agreement (the “New Plea Agreement”) with the DOJ, which has been filed with the District Court, and replaces the Superseding Plea Agreement. At a hearing on March 23, 2017, TMX USVI and TMX LP pled guilty to four misdemeanor charges of violations of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act related to improper applications of methyl bromide, as set forth in a new Information filed on January 20, 2017 with the District Court that is substantially similar to the March 29, 2016 Information. Under the terms of the New Plea Agreement, the parties agreed and jointly recommended to the District Court that (i) TMX USVI and TMX LP each pay a fine of $4 million (total of $8 million); (ii) TMX USVI pay $1 million to the EPA for costs incurred by the EPA for the response and clean-up of the affected units at the resort in St. John; (iii) TMX USVI make a community service payment of $1 million to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation for the purpose of engaging a third party to provide training to pesticide applicators in the U.S. Virgin Islands; and (iv) both TMX USVI and TMX LP serve a three-year probation period, subject to the special conditions of probation under the New Plea Agreement. The total financial terms of the recommended sentence under the New Plea Agreement are equivalent in total amount to the financial terms under the Superseding Plea Agreement. Unlike the Superseding Plea Agreement, however, the New Plea Agreement is non-binding on the District Court. The sentencing hearing before the District Court previously scheduled for July 27, 2017, has been rescheduled for September 21, 2017. It is possible that at that hearing the District Court could use its discretion to impose fines or other terms different than those in the New Plea Agreement. If approved by the District Court, and upon compliance with the terms and conditions of the New Plea Agreement, the New Plea Agreement will resolve the federal criminal consequences associated with the DOJ investigation. The New Plea Agreement does not bind any other federal, state or local authority; however, the EPA has indicated that it does not intend to initiate any administrative enforcement action or refer the matter to the DOJ for any civil enforcement action if the New Plea Agreement is approved by the District Court.  

The Company has previously recorded within Fumigation related matters in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income total charges of $10 million in connection with the aforementioned criminal matter. On December 16, 2016, the U.S. Virgin Islands Department of Justice filed a civil complaint in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands related to the aforementioned fumigation incident in a matter styled Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. The ServiceMaster Company, LLC, The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership, and Terminix International USVI, LLC. The amount and extent of any further potential penalties, fines, sanctions, costs and damages that the federal or other governmental authorities may yet impose, investigation or other costs and reputational harm, as well as the impact of any additional civil, criminal or other claims or judicial, administrative or regulatory proceedings resulting from or related to the U.S. Virgin Islands matter, which could be material, is not currently known, and any such further penalties, fines, sanctions, costs or damages would not be covered under the Company’s general liability insurance policies. 

 



---

 

Note 4. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized and are subject to assessment for impairment by applying a fair-value based test on an annual basis or more frequently if circumstances indicate a potential impairment. The Company’s annual assessment date is October 1. There were no goodwill or trade name impairment charges recorded in the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. There were no accumulated impairment losses recorded as of June 30, 2017. The table below summarizes the goodwill balances for continuing operations by reportable segment:



The table below summarizes the other intangible asset balances for continuing operations:



___________________________________

For the existing intangible assets, the Company anticipates amortization expense for the remainder of 2017 and each of the next five years of $13  million, $21 million, $16 million, $12 million, $9 million and $6 million, respectively.

 



Note 5. Stock-Based Compensation 

For the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of  $4 million ($2 million, net of tax) and $4 million ($2 million, net of tax), respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of  $9 million ($5 million, net of tax) and $7 million ($4 million, net of tax), respectively. These charges are recorded within Selling and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. 

As of June 30, 2017 there was $33 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested stock options, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance shares granted under the Amended and Restated ServiceMaster Global Holdings, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (“MSIP”) and the Amended and Restated ServiceMaster Global Holdings, Inc. 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Incentive Plan”) and discounts associated with the ServiceMaster Global Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Employee Stock Purchase Plan”). These remaining costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of  2.41 years.

 

---

 

Note 6. Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income, which primarily includes net income (loss), unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities, unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments and the effect of foreign currency translation gain (loss), is disclosed in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

The following tables summarize the activity in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of the related tax effects.



___________________________________

Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) included the following components for the periods indicated.

 

 

---

 

Note 7. Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Supplemental information relating to the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows is presented in the following table:

As of June 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016, Cash and cash equivalents of $378 million, $291 million, and $342 million, respectively, and Restricted cash of $89 million, $95 million, and $95 million, respectively, as presented on the condensed consolidated statements of financial position represent the amounts comprising Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash of $467 million, $386 million, and $437 million, respectively, on the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows. There was no restricted cash balance as of December 31, 2015.

The Company acquired $23 million and $29 million of property and equipment through capital leases and other non-cash  financing transactions in the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, which have been excluded from the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows as non-cash investing and financing activities. 

In the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company converted certain company-owned Merry Maids branches to franchises for a total purchase price of $8 million. In the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company received cash of $6 million and provided financing of $2 million. These financed amounts have been excluded from the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows as non-cash investing activities.

 



Note 8. Cash and Marketable Securities

Cash, money market funds and certificates of deposits with maturities of three months or less when purchased are included in Cash and cash equivalents on the condensed consolidated statements of financial position. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company’s investments consisted primarily of treasury bills (“Debt securities”) and common equity securities (“Equity securities”). The amortized cost, fair value and gross unrealized gains and losses of the Company’s short- and long-term investments in Debt and Equity securities are as follows:



There were no unrealized losses which had been in a loss position for more than one year as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. 

Gains and losses on sales of investments, as determined on a specific identification basis, are included in investment income in the period they are realized. The Company periodically reviews its portfolio of investments to determine whether there has been an other than temporary decline in the value of the investments from factors such as deterioration in the financial condition of the issuer or the market(s) in which the issuer competes. The table below summarizes proceeds, gross realized gains and gross realized losses resulting from sales of available-for-sale securities. There were no impairment charges due to other than temporary declines in the value of certain investments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

 







---

 



Note 9. Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt is summarized in the following table:



___________________________________



Repurchase of Notes

On May 11, 2017, the Company purchased $17 million in aggregate principal amount of its 7.25% notes maturing in 2038 at a price of 97% of the principal amount using available cash. The repurchased notes were delivered to the trustee for cancellation.  In connection with this partial repurchase, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $3 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.

Interest Rate Swaps

Interest rate swap agreements in effect as of June 30, 2017 are as follows:

___________________________________

(1)Before the application of the applicable borrowing margin.

 



Note 10. Acquisitions

Acquisitions have been accounted for using the acquisition method and, accordingly, the results of operations of the acquired businesses have been included in the condensed consolidated financial statements since their dates of acquisition. The assets and liabilities of these businesses were recorded in the financial statements at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition dates. 

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company completed two pest control acquisitions and purchased a ServiceMaster Clean master distributor within the Franchise Services Group. The total purchase price for these acquisitions was $14 million. The Company recorded goodwill of $1 million and other intangibles, primarily reacquired rights, of $13 million related to these acquisitions. 

On November 30, 2016, the Company acquired Landmark Home Warranty, LLC (“Landmark”) for a total purchase price of $39 million. The Company recorded goodwill of $37 million and other intangibles, primarily customer relationships, of $13 million related to this acquisition. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company finalized its assessment of the fair value of the

---

 

assets acquired and liabilities assumed.  The Company updated its preliminary allocation and reclassified $4 million from other intangibles, primarily customer relationships, to goodwill.

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company completed several pest control and termite acquisitions. The total purchase price for these acquisitions was $23 million. The Company recorded goodwill of $17 million and other intangibles of $3 million related to these acquisitions.  On June 27, 2016, the Company acquired OneGuard Home Warranties (“OneGuard”) for a total purchase price of $65 million. The Company recorded goodwill of $57 million and other intangibles of $15 million related to the OneGuard acquisition.

Supplemental cash flow information regarding the Company’s acquisitions is as follows:





















Note 11. Income Taxes 

As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had $13 million of tax benefits primarily reflected in state tax returns that have not been recognized for financial reporting purposes (“unrecognized tax benefits”). Based on information currently available, it is reasonably possible that over the next 12 month period unrecognized tax benefits may decrease by $2 million as the result of settlements of ongoing audits, statute of limitation expirations or final settlements of uncertain tax positions in multiple jurisdictions.

As required by Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 740, “Income Taxes,” the Company computes interim period income taxes by applying an anticipated annual effective tax rate to the Company’s year-to-date income or loss from continuing operations before income taxes, except for significant unusual or infrequently occurring items. The Company’s estimated tax rate is adjusted each quarter in accordance with ASC 740.

The effective tax rate on income from continuing operations was 38.0 percent and 31.0 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The effective tax rate on income from continuing operations for the three months ended June 30, 2016 was primarily affected by excess tax benefits for share-based awards and the release of a valuation allowance recorded discretely during the quarter.

The effective tax rate on income from continuing operations was 38.0 percent and 35.4 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The effective tax rate on income from continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was primarily affected by excess tax benefits for share-based awards and the release of a valuation allowance recorded discretely during the second quarter.

 

Note 12. Business Segment Reporting

The business of the Company is conducted through three reportable segments: Terminix, American Home Shield and Franchise Services Group.

In accordance with accounting standards for segments, the Company’s reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different services. The Terminix segment provides termite and pest control services to residential and commercial customers and distributes pest control products. The American Home Shield segment provides home warranties for household systems and appliances. The Franchise Services Group segment provides residential and commercial disaster restoration, janitorial and cleaning services through franchises primarily under the ServiceMaster, ServiceMaster Restore and ServiceMaster Clean brand names, home cleaning services through franchises primarily under the Merry Maids brand name, cabinet and wood furniture repair primarily under the Furniture Medic brand name and home inspection services primarily under the AmeriSpec brand name. Corporate includes SMAC, the Company’s financing subsidiary exclusively dedicated to providing financing to its franchisees and retail customers of its operating units, and the Company’s headquarters operations (substantially all of which costs are allocated to the Company’s reportable segments), which provide various technology, marketing, finance, legal and other support services to the reportable segments. The composition of the Company’s reportable segments is consistent with that used by the Company’s chief operating decision maker (the “CODM”) to evaluate performance and allocate resources.

Information regarding the accounting policies used by the Company is described in the Company’s 2016 Form 10-K. The Company derives substantially all of its revenue from customers and franchisees in the United States with approximately two percent

---

 

generated in foreign markets. Operating expenses of the business units consist primarily of direct costs and indirect costs allocated from Corporate.

The Company uses Reportable Segment Adjusted EBITDA as its measure of segment profitability. Accordingly, the CODM evaluates performance and allocates resources based primarily on Reportable Segment Adjusted EBITDA. Reportable Segment Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income before: unallocated corporate expenses; income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes; provision for income taxes; interest expense; depreciation and amortization expense; 401(k) Plan corrective contribution; fumigation related matters; insurance reserve adjustment; non-cash stock-based compensation expense; restructuring charges; gain on sale of Merry Maids branches; non-cash impairment of software and other related costs; and loss on extinguishment of debt. The Company’s definition of Reportable Segment Adjusted EBITDA may not be calculated or comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. The Company believes Reportable Segment Adjusted EBITDA is useful for investors, analysts and other interested parties as it facilitates company-to-company operating performance comparisons by excluding potential differences caused by variations in capital structures, taxation, the age and book depreciation of facilities and equipment, restructuring initiatives and equity-based, long-term incentive plans.

Information for continuing operations for each reportable segment and Corporate is presented below:



___________________________________

























Note 13. Related Party Transactions

TruGreen Spin-off

In connection with the TruGreen spin-off on January 14, 2014, the Company entered into a transition services agreement with TruGreen Holding Corporation (“TruGreen”) pursuant to which the Company provides  TruGreen with specified communications,

---

 

public relations, finance and accounting, tax, treasury, internal audit, human resources operations and benefits, risk management and insurance, supply management, real estate management, marketing, facilities, information technology and other support services. The charges for the transition services are designed to allow the Company to fully recover the direct costs of providing the services, plus specified margins and any out-of-pocket costs and expenses. The services provided under the transition services agreement terminated at various specified times on or prior to December 31, 2016, except certain information technology services, which the Company has entered into an amendment to the transition services agreement with TruGreen to extend through June 30, 2018.  TruGreen may terminate the extended transition services agreement for convenience upon 90 days written notice.

Under this transition services agreement, the Company recorded $1 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and $2 million and $4 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, of fees from TruGreen, which is included as a reduction in Selling and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income. As of June 30, 2017, all amounts owed by TruGreen under this agreement have been paid. 

Note 14. Fair Value Measurements

The period-end carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, restricted cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. The period-end carrying amounts of long-term notes receivable approximate fair value as the effective interest rates for these instruments are comparable to period-end market rates. The period-end carrying amounts of short- and long-term marketable securities also approximate fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported net of tax as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the condensed consolidated statements of financial position, or, for certain unrealized losses, reported in interest and net investment income in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income if the decline in value is other than temporary. The carrying amount of total debt was $2,819 million and $2,831 million and the estimated fair value was $2,938 million and $2,930 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The fair value of the Company’s debt is estimated based on available market prices for the same or similar instruments which are considered significant other observable inputs (Level 2) within the fair value hierarchy. The fair values presented reflect the amounts that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The fair value estimates presented in this report are based on information available to the Company as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

The Company has estimated the fair value of its financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis using the market and income approaches. For investments in marketable securities, deferred compensation trust assets and derivative contracts, which are carried at their fair values, the Company’s fair value estimates incorporate quoted market prices, other observable inputs (for example, forward interest rates) and unobservable inputs (for example, forward commodity prices) at the balance sheet date.

Interest rate swap contracts are valued using forward interest rate curves obtained from third-party market data providers. The fair value of each contract is the sum of the expected future settlements between the contract counterparties, discounted to present value. The expected future settlements are determined by comparing the contract interest rate to the expected forward interest rate as of each settlement date and applying the difference between the two rates to the notional amount of debt in the interest rate swap contracts.

Fuel swap contracts are valued using forward fuel price curves obtained from third-party market data providers. The fair value of each contract is the sum of the expected future settlements between the contract counterparties, discounted to present value. The expected future settlements are determined by comparing the contract fuel price to the expected forward fuel price as of each settlement date and applying the difference between the contract and expected prices to the notional gallons in the fuel swap contracts. The Company regularly reviews the forward price curves obtained from third-party market data providers and related changes in fair value for reasonableness utilizing information available to the Company from other published sources.

The Company has not changed its valuation techniques for measuring the fair value of any financial assets and liabilities during the year. Transfers between levels, if any, are recognized at the end of the reporting period. There were no significant transfers between levels during each of the six month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

---

 

The carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis for the periods presented are as follows:



A  reconciliation of the beginning and ending fair values of financial instruments valued using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) on a recurring basis is presented as follows:



---

 

The following tables present information relating to the significant unobservable inputs of the Company’s Level 3 financial instruments:



___________________________________

The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage risks associated with changes in fuel prices and interest rates. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. In designating its derivative financial instruments as hedging instruments under accounting standards for derivative instruments, the Company formally documents the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item, as well as the risk management objective and strategy for the use of the hedging instrument. This documentation includes linking the derivatives to forecasted transactions. The Company assesses at the time a derivative contract is entered into, and at least quarterly thereafter, whether the derivative item is effective in offsetting the projected changes in cash flows of the associated forecasted transactions. All of the Company’s designated hedging instruments are classified as cash flow hedges.

The Company has historically hedged a significant portion of its annual fuel consumption. The Company has also historically hedged the interest payments on a portion of its variable rate debt through the use of interest rate swap agreements. All of the Company’s fuel swap contracts and interest rate swap contracts are classified as cash flow hedges, and, as such, the hedging instruments are recorded on the condensed consolidated statements of financial position as either an asset or liability at fair value, with the effective portion of changes in the fair value attributable to the hedged risks recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Any change in the fair value of the hedging instrument resulting from ineffectiveness, as defined by accounting standards, is recognized in current period earnings. Cash flows related to fuel and interest rate derivatives are classified as operating activities in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

Ineffective portions of derivative instruments designated in accordance with accounting standards as cash flow hedge relationships were insignificant during the six months ended June 30, 2017. As of June 30, 2017, the Company had fuel swap contracts to pay fixed prices for fuel with an aggregate notional amount of $33 million, maturing through 2018. Under the terms of its fuel swap contracts, the Company is required to post collateral in the event that the fair value of the contracts exceeds a certain agreed upon liability level and in other circumstances required by the counterparty. As of June 30, 2017, the Company had posted $2 million in letters of credit as collateral under its fuel hedging program, which were issued under the Revolving Credit Facility.

The effective portion of the gain or loss on derivative instruments designated and qualifying as cash flow hedging instruments is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). These amounts are reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged forecasted debt interest settlement or the fuel settlement affects earnings. See Note 6 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for the effective portion of the gain or loss on derivative instruments recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and for the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and into earnings. The amount expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next 12 months includes unrealized gains and losses related to open fuel hedges and interest rate swaps. Specifically, as the underlying forecasted transactions occur during the next 12 months, the hedging gains and losses in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) expected to be recognized in earnings is a loss of $4 million, net of tax, as of June 30, 2017. The amounts that are ultimately reclassified into earnings will be based on actual fuel prices and interest rates at the time the positions are settled and may differ materially from the amount noted above.

 





Note 15. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, increased to include the number of shares of common stock that would have been outstanding had potential dilutive shares of common stock been issued. The dilutive effect of stock options, RSUs and performance shares are reflected in diluted net income per share by applying the treasury stock method.

---

 

A reconciliation of the amounts included in the computation of basic earnings per share from continuing operations and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations is as follows:



___________________________________



Note 16. Subsequent Events

On July 26, 2017, the Company issued a press release announcing that the Company intends to separate its American Home Shield business from the Company’s Terminix and Franchise Services Group businesses by means of a spinoff of the American Home Shield business to Company shareholders, resulting in two publicly traded companies. The spin-off would create two independent companies each with an enhanced strategic focus, simplified operating structure, distinct investment identity and strong financial profile. The transaction is expected to be completed in the third quarter of 2018, subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, including the effectiveness of a Registration Statement on Form 10 to be filed with the SEC,  receipt of a favorable ruling from the IRS concerning certain tax matters and final approval by the Company’s board of directors, and it is intended to qualify as a tax-free distribution to the Company’s shareholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

The Company also announced the appointment of Nikhil M. Varty as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and as a member of the board of directors of the Company, in each case effective as of July 26, 2017, and that Robert J. Gillette ceased to hold the position of Chief Executive Officer of the Company as of July 25, 2017, and resigned as a member of the board of directors as of July 30, 2017.  Mr. Gillette will receive the severance payments and benefits to which he is entitled under his existing employment agreement.



 

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following information should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The following discussion may contain forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include those factors discussed below and elsewhere in this report, particularly in “—Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

Overview

Our core services include termite and pest control, home warranties, disaster restoration, janitorial, residential cleaning, cabinet and wood furniture repair and home inspection under the following leading brands: Terminix, American Home Shield, ServiceMaster Restore, ServiceMaster Clean, Merry Maids, Furniture Medic and AmeriSpec. Our operations for the periods presented in this report are organized into three reportable segments: Terminix, American Home Shield and Franchise Services Group.

Recent Events

On July 26, 2017, the Company issued a press release announcing that the Company intends to separate its American Home Shield business from the Company’s Terminix and Franchise Services Group businesses by means of a spinoff of the American Home Shield business to Company shareholders, resulting in two publicly traded companies. The spin-off would create two independent companies each with an enhanced strategic focus, simplified operating structure, distinct investment identity and strong financial profile. The transaction is expected to be completed in the third quarter of 2018, subject to satisfaction of customary conditions, including the effectiveness of a Registration Statement on Form 10 to be filed with the SEC,  receipt of a favorable ruling from the IRS concerning certain tax matters and final approval by the Company’s board of directors, and it is intended to qualify as a tax-free distribution to the Company’s shareholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes.



---

 

The Company also announced the appointment of Nikhil M. Varty as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and as a member of the board of directors of the Company, in each case effective as of July 26, 2017, and that Robert J. Gillette ceased to hold the position of Chief Executive Officer of the Company as of July 25, 2017, and resigned as a member of the board of directors as of July 30, 2017. Mr. Gillette will receive the severance payments and benefits to which he is entitled under his existing employment agreement.

Key Business Metrics

We focus on a variety of indicators and key operating and financial metrics to monitor the financial condition and performance of the continuing operations of our businesses. These metrics include:

To the extent applicable, these measures are evaluated with and without impairment, restructuring and other charges that management believes are not indicative of the earnings capabilities of our businesses. We also focus on measures designed to monitor cash flow, including net cash provided from operating activities from continuing operations and free cash flow.

Revenue. Our revenue results are primarily a function of the volume and pricing of the services and products provided to our customers by our businesses as well as the mix of services and products provided across our businesses. The volume of our revenue in Terminix and American Home Shield is impacted by new unit sales, the retention of our existing customers and acquisitions. We expect to continue our tuck-in acquisition program at Terminix and to periodically evaluate other strategic acquisitions. Revenue results in the Franchise Services Group are driven principally by royalty fees earned from our franchisees. We serve both residential and commercial customers, principally in the United States. In 2016, approximately 98 percent of our revenue was generated by sales in the United States.

Operating Expenses. In addition to the impact of changes in our revenue results, our operating results are affected by, among other things, the level of our operating expenses. A number of our operating expenses are subject to inflationary pressures, such as fuel, chemicals, raw materials, wages and salaries, employee benefits and health care, vehicles, contractor costs, self-insurance costs and other insurance premiums, as well as various regulatory compliance costs.

Net Income and Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, increased to include the number of shares of common stock that would have been outstanding had potential dilutive shares of common stock been issued. The dilutive effect of stock options and RSUs are reflected in diluted net income per share by applying the treasury stock method. The presentation of net income and earnings per share provides GAAP measures of performance which are useful for investors, analysts and other interested parties in company-to-company operating performance comparisons.

Adjusted EBITDA. We evaluate performance and allocate resources based primarily on Adjusted EBITDA. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income before: income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes; provision for income taxes; interest expense; depreciation and amortization expense; 401(k) Plan corrective contribution; fumigation related matters; insurance reserve adjustment; non-cash stock-based compensation expense; restructuring charges; gain on sale of Merry Maids branches; and non-cash impairment of software and other related costs. We believe Adjusted EBITDA is useful for investors, analysts and other interested parties as it facilitates company-to-company operating performance comparisons by excluding potential differences caused by variations in capital structures, taxation, the age and book depreciation of facilities and equipment, restructuring initiatives and equity-based, long-term incentive plans.

Organic Revenue Growth. We evaluate organic revenue growth to track performance of the business, including the impacts of sales, pricing, new service offerings and other growth initiatives. Organic revenue growth excludes revenue from acquired customers for 12 months following the acquisition date.

Customer Retention Rates and Customer Counts Growth. Where applicable, we report our customer retention rates and growth in customer counts in order to track the performance of the business. Customer counts represent our recurring customer base, which includes customers with active contracts for recurring services. Retention rates are calculated as the ratio of ending customer

---

 

counts to the sum of beginning customer counts, new sales and acquired accounts for the applicable period. These measures are presented on a rolling, 12-month basis in order to avoid seasonal anomalies. See “—Segment Review.”

Seasonality

We have seasonality in our business, which drives fluctuations in revenue and Adjusted EBITDA for interim periods. In 2016, approximately 22 percent, 27 percent, 28 percent and 23 percent of our revenue and approximately 19 percent, 30 percent, 29 percent and 22 percent of our Adjusted EBITDA was recognized in the first, second, third and fourth quarters, respectively.

Effect of Weather Conditions

The demand for our services and our results of operations are also affected by weather conditions, including the seasonal nature of our termite and pest control services, home inspection services and disaster restoration services. Weather conditions which have a potentially unfavorable impact to our business include cooler temperatures or droughts which can impede the development of termite swarms and lead to lower demand for our termite control services; and extreme temperatures which can lead to an increase in service requests related to household systems.  For example, in the third quarter of 2016, we experienced an increase in contract claims cost at American Home Shield driven by a higher number of HVAC work orders driven by high temperatures. Weather conditions which have a potentially favorable impact to our business include mild winters which can lead to higher demand for termite and pest control services; mild winters or summers which can lead to lower household systems claim frequency; and severe storms which can lead to an increase in demand for disaster restoration services.

Franchises

Franchises are important to the Terminix, ServiceMaster Restore, ServiceMaster Clean, Merry Maids, Furniture Medic and AmeriSpec businesses. Total profits from our franchised operations were $22 million and $21 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $44 million and $39 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  Nearly all of the franchise fees received by our Franchise Services Group segment are derived from the ServiceMaster Restore, ServiceMaster Clean and Merry Maids businesses. Franchise fees from our Terminix franchisees represented less than one percent of Terminix revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. We evaluate the performance of our franchise businesses based primarily on operating profit before corporate general and administrative expenses, interest expense and amortization of intangible assets. Franchise agreements entered into in the course of these businesses are generally for a term of five years. The majority of these franchise agreements are renewed prior to expiration. Internationally, we have license agreements, whereby licensees provide services under our brand names that would ordinarily be provided by franchisees in the United States. The majority of international licenses are for 10‑year terms.

 Results of Operations







---

 

_________________________________

*     not meaningful

Revenue

We reported revenue of $807 million and $747 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and revenue of $1,450 million and $1,355 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. A summary of changes in revenue for each of our reportable segments and Corporate is included in the table below. See “—Segment Review” for a discussion of the drivers of the year-over-year changes.









---

 

________________________________

Cost of Services Rendered and Products Sold

We reported cost of services rendered and products sold of $415 million and $379 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $761 million and $704 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  The following table provides a summary of changes in cost of services rendered and products sold for each of our reportable segments and Corporate:

_________________________________

At Terminix, the increase in production labor was driven by investments in field operations focused on improving safety, customer service and retention. The increase in damage claims was driven by increased termite warranty claims. The increase in our insurance programs was principally driven by an increase in the number of company-owned sales vehicles. Additionally, the increase in technology costs was driven by investments to improve our customers’ experiences through technology.

The increase in contract claims costs at American Home Shield is primarily due to normal inflationary pressure on the underlying costs of repairs.

We realized a reduction in cost of sales of $2 million in the Franchise Services Group as a result of the branch conversions completed in 2016.



_________________________________

At Terminix, the increase in production labor was driven by investments in field operations focused on improving safety, customer service and retention. The increase in damage claims was driven by increased termite warranty claims. The increase in our insurance programs was principally driven by an increase in the number of company-owned sales vehicles. Additionally, the increase in technology costs was driven by investments to improve our customers’ experiences through technology.

The increase in contract claims costs at American Home Shield is primarily due to normal inflationary pressure on the underlying costs of repairs.

We realized a reduction in cost of sales of $5 million in the Franchise Services Group as a result of the branch conversions completed in 2016.

Selling and Administrative Expenses

We reported selling and administrative expenses of $206 million and $187 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $392 million and $360 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  For the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, selling and administrative expenses comprised general and administrative expenses of $74 million and $69 million, respectively, and selling and marketing expenses of $132 million and $118 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, selling and administrative expenses comprised general and administrative expenses of $151 million and $144 million, respectively, and selling and marketing expenses of $241 million and $216 million, respectively. The following table provides a summary of changes in selling and administrative expenses for each of our reportable segments and Corporate:



The increase in sales and marketing costs at Terminix was driven by investments to grow and train our sales force, higher commissions attributable to the growth in core termite, wildlife exclusion and attic insulation sales and incremental marketing investments. 

At American Home Shield, the decrease in sales and marketing costs is driven by the timing of a marketing campaign. We incurred incremental selling and administrative expenses as a result of the OneGuard and Landmark acquisitions. Additionally, the increase in customer service costs is due to higher labor costs resulting from an acceleration of pre-season hiring and training in preparation for the high-volume summer season and an overall increase in call center staffing levels to improve response times.



The increase in sales and marketing costs at Terminix was driven by investments to grow and train our sales force, higher commissions attributable to the growth in core termite, wildlife exclusion and attic insulation sales and incremental marketing investments. 

At American Home Shield, the decrease in sales and marketing costs is driven by the timing of a marketing campaign. We incurred incremental selling and administrative expenses as a result of the OneGuard and Landmark acquisitions. Additionally, the increase in customer service costs is due to higher labor costs resulting from an acceleration of pre-season hiring and training in preparation for the high-volume summer season and an overall increase in call center staffing levels to improve response times.

Amortization Expense

Amortization expense was $7 million and $8 million in the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $14 million and $16 million in the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 respectively.



401(k) Plan Corrective Contribution

We recorded a charge of $1 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 related to the 401(k) Plan. See Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for more details. Charges for 401(k) Plan corrective contributions recorded in the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 were less than $1 million.

Fumigation Related Matters

We recorded charges of $1 million and $88 million in the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $2 million and $91 million in the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, for fumigation related matters. There were no charges for fumigation related matters recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2017.  See Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for more details.

Insurance Reserve Adjustment

        We recorded a charge of $23 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 for an adjustment to the Company’s accrued self-insured claims related to automobile, general liability and workers’ compensation risks. The adjustment was based on the Company’s detailed annual assessment of this actuarially determined accrual, which the Company completes in the second quarter of each year. This adjustment related to coverage periods of 2015 and prior. There were no insurance reserve adjustment charges recorded in the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.

Impairment of Software and Other Related Costs

We recorded impairment charges of $1 million in the three months ended June 30, 2016 and $2 million and $1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, relating to our decision to replace certain software. There were no charges for impairment of software and other related costs recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2017.

Restructuring Charges 

We incurred restructuring charges of $1 million and $4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $3 million and $5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, these charges included $1 million of costs related to the relocation of our headquarters. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, these charges included $2 million of severance. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, these charges included $2 million of lease termination costs and $1 million of severance primarily related to the decision to consolidate the stand-alone operations of a previously acquired business with those of the Terminix branch organization.



Gain on Sale of Merry Maids Branches 

We recorded a gain of $2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016, associated with the branch conversions at Merry Maids. There was no gain recorded in the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and three months ended June 30, 2016. As of October 10, 2016, the branch conversion process was complete.

---

 

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $38 million in each of the three month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 and $75 million and $76 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Interest and Net Investment Income

Interest and net investment income was $1 million and $4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $1 million and $4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and comprised net investment gains and interest and dividend income realized on the American Home Shield investment portfolio and interest income on other cash balances. 

Income from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes

Income from continuing operations before income taxes was $137 million and $23 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $199 million and $85 million for six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  The change in income from continuing operations before income taxes primarily reflects the net effect of year-over-year changes in the following items:



___________________________________

Provision for Income Taxes

The effective tax rate on income from continuing operations was 38.0 percent and 31.0 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  The effective tax rate on income from continuing operations for the three months ended June 30, 2016 was primarily affected by excess tax benefits for share-based awards and the release of a valuation allowance recorded discretely during the quarter. 

The effective tax rate on income from continuing operations was 38.0 percent and 35.4 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  The effective tax rate on income from continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was primarily affected by excess tax benefits for share-based awards and the release of a valuation allowance recorded discretely during the second quarter. 

Net Income

Net income was $85 million and $16 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and was driven by a $114 million increase in income from continuing operations before income taxes, offset, in part, by a $45 million increase in the provision for income taxes. Net income was $124 million and $54 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and was primarily driven by a $114 million increase in income from continuing operations before income taxes, offset, in part, by a $46 million increase in the provision for income taxes.

---

 

Segment Review

The following business segment reviews should be read in conjunction with the required footnote disclosures presented in the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report.

Revenue and Adjusted EBITDA by reportable segment and for Corporate are as follows:



___________________________________

* not meaningful

Terminix Segment

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2016

The Terminix segment, which provides termite and pest control services to residential and commercial customers and distributes pest control products, reported a three percent increase in revenue and a seven percent decrease in Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016.

Revenue

Revenue by service line is as follows:







Pest control revenue increased one percent. Pest control revenue was comparable to the prior year period and was significantly impacted by a $5 million organic revenue decline associated with Alterra Pest Control (“Alterra”). Excluding Alterra, organic pest control revenue growth was $5 million, or 2 percent.

Termite revenue, including the wildlife exclusion, crawl space encapsulation and attic insulation products, which are managed as a component of our termite line of business, increased five percent. In the three months ended June 30, 2017, termite renewal revenue comprised 47 percent of total termite revenue, while the remainder consisted of termite new unit revenue. Organic termite revenue increased five percent, reflecting an increase in core termite, wildlife exclusion and attic insulation sales, improved price realization and a favorable change in the timing of termite renewal services. Termite activity is unpredictable in its nature. Factors that can impact termite activity include conducive weather conditions and consumer awareness of termite swarms.

---

 

Adjusted EBITDA

The following table provides a summary of changes in the segment’s Adjusted EBITDA:



The increase in production labor was driven by investments in field operations focused on improving safety, customer service and retention. The increase in damage claims was driven by increased termite warranty claims. The increase in our insurance programs was principally driven by an increase in the number of company-owned sales vehicles. The increase in technology costs was driven by investments to improve our customers’ experiences through technology. The increase in sales and marketing costs was driven by investments to grow and train our sales force, higher commissions attributable to the growth in core termite, wildlife exclusion and attic insulation sales and incremental marketing investments.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2016



The Terminix segment reported a two percent increase in revenue and a 10 percent decrease in Adjusted EBITDA for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Revenue

Revenue by service line is as follows:



Pest control revenue was comparable to the prior year period. Pest control revenue decreased two percent and was significantly impacted by an $11 million organic revenue decline associated with Alterra. Excluding Alterra, organic pest control revenue growth was $3 million, or 1 percent.

Termite revenue, including the wildlife exclusion, crawl space encapsulation and attic insulation products, which are managed as a component of our termite line of business increased five percent. In the six months ended June 30, 2017, termite renewal revenue comprised 50 percent of total termite revenue, while the remainder consisted of termite new unit revenue. Organic termite revenue increased four percent, reflecting an increase in core termite, wildlife exclusion and attic insulation sales and improved price realization.

---

 

Adjusted EBITDA

The following table provides a summary of changes in the segment’s Adjusted EBITDA:



The increase in production labor was driven by investments in field operations focused on improving safety, customer service and retention. The increase in damage claims was driven by increased termite warranty claims. The increase in our insurance programs was principally driven by an increase in the number of company-owned sales vehicles. The increase in technology costs was driven by investments to improve our customers’ experiences through technology. The increase in sales and marketing costs was driven by investments to grow and train our sales force, higher commissions attributable to the growth in core termite, wildlife exclusion and attic insulation sales and incremental marketing investments.





American Home Shield Segment

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2016

The American Home Shield segment, which provides home warranties for household systems and appliances, reported a 15 percent increase in revenue and a 15 percent increase in Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016.

The growth in renewable customer counts and customer retention are presented below.



Revenue

The revenue results reflect an increase in new unit sales, improved price realization and the impact of the OneGuard and Landmark acquisitions (an approximate $21 million increase).

Adjusted EBITDA

The following table provides a summary of changes in the segment’s Adjusted EBITDA: 

The increase in contract claims costs is primarily due to normal inflationary pressure on the underlying costs of repairs. The decrease in sales and marketing costs is driven by the timing of a marketing campaign. We incurred incremental selling and administrative expenses as a result of the OneGuard and Landmark acquisitions. Additionally, the increase in customer service costs is

---

 

due to higher labor costs resulting from an acceleration of pre-season hiring and training in preparation for the high-volume summer season and an overall increase in call center staffing levels to improve response times.

In the three months ended June 30, 2016, the segment’s Adjusted EBITDA included interest and net investment income from the American Home Shield investment portfolio of $3 million. There were no such investment gains in the three months ended June 30, 2017.

Extreme temperatures in 2017 could lead to an increase in service requests related to household systems, resulting in higher claim frequency and costs.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2016

The American Home Shield segment reported a 16 percent increase in revenue and a 25 percent increase in Adjusted EBITDA for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Revenue

The revenue results reflect an increase in new unit sales, improved price realization and the impact of the OneGuard and Landmark acquisitions (an approximate $38 million increase).

Adjusted EBITDA

The following table provides a summary of changes in the segment’s Adjusted EBITDA:



The increase in contract claims costs is primarily due to normal inflationary pressure on the underlying costs of repairs, offset in part, by a lower number of work orders. The decrease in sales and marketing costs is driven by the timing of a marketing campaign. We incurred incremental selling and administrative expenses as a result of the OneGuard and Landmark acquisitions. Additionally, the increase in customer service costs is due to higher labor costs resulting from an acceleration of pre-season hiring and training in preparation for the high-volume summer season and an overall increase in call center staffing levels to improve response times.

In the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the segment’s Adjusted EBITDA included interest and net investment income from the American Home Shield investment portfolio of $1 million and $4 million, respectively.

Franchise Services Group Segment

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 

The Franchise Services Group segment, which consists of the ServiceMaster Restore (disaster restoration), ServiceMaster Clean (janitorial), Merry Maids (residential cleaning), Furniture Medic (cabinet and wood furniture repair) and AmeriSpec (home inspection) businesses, reported a five percent increase in revenue and a 15 percent increase in Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016.

Revenue

Revenue by service line is as follows:



---

 

The increase in royalty fees was primarily driven by higher disaster restoration services. The $2 million decline in revenue from company-owned Merry Maids branches was attributable to the branch conversions, which were completed in 2016. The increase in revenue from janitorial national accounts was driven by increased sales activity.

Adjusted EBITDA

The following table provides a summary of changes in the segment’s Adjusted EBITDA:



Excluding the impact of the branch conversions at Merry Maids, the increase in revenue resulted in a $2 million increase in Adjusted EBITDA. The reduction in revenue from company-owned Merry Maids branches had a negligible impact on Adjusted EBITDA.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 

The Franchise Services Group segment reported a three percent increase in revenue and a 17 percent increase in Adjusted EBITDA for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Revenue

Revenue by service line is as follows: 



The increase in royalty fees was primarily driven by higher disaster restoration services. The $6 million decline in revenue from company-owned Merry Maids branches was attributable to the branch conversions, which were completed in 2016. The increase in revenue from janitorial national accounts was driven by increased sales activity.

Adjusted EBITDA

The following table provides a summary of changes in the segment’s Adjusted EBITDA:



Excluding the impact of the branch conversions at Merry Maids, the increase in revenue resulted in a $5 million increase in Adjusted EBITDA. The reduction in revenue from company-owned Merry Maids branches had a negligible impact on Adjusted EBITDA.

Corporate

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 

Adjusted EBITDA for Corporate for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was comparable to the three months ended June 30, 2016.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 

Corporate reported a $4 million increase in Adjusted EBITDA for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016. The six month ended June 30, 2016 included increased reserves in our automobile, general liability and workers’ compensation insurance program of $4 million driven by unfavorable claims trends, which were impacted by a charge of $3 million in connection with civil claims related to an incident at a family’s residence in Palm Beach County, Florida (an amount equal

---

 

to our insurance deductibles under our general liability insurance program). There were no increased reserves in our automobile, general liability and workers’ compensation insurance program for the six months ended June 30, 2017.









Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity

We are highly leveraged, and a substantial portion of our liquidity needs are due to service requirements on our significant indebtedness. The agreements governing the $1,650 million term loan facility maturing November 8, 2023 and the $300 million revolving credit facility maturing November 8, 2021 (together, the “Credit Facilities”) contain covenants that limit or restrict our ability, including the ability of certain of our subsidiaries, to incur additional indebtedness, repurchase debt, incur liens, sell assets, make certain payments (including dividends) and enter into transactions with affiliates. As of June 30, 2017, we were in compliance with the covenants under the agreements that were in effect on such date.

Our ongoing liquidity needs are expected to be funded by cash on hand, net cash provided by operating activities and, as required, borrowings under the Credit Facilities. We expect that cash provided from operations and available capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility will provide sufficient funds to operate our business, make expected capital expenditures and meet our liquidity requirements for the following 12 months, including payment of interest and principal on our debt. Cash and short- and long-term marketable securities totaled $431 million as of June 30, 2017, compared with $335 million as of December 31, 2016. As of June 30, 2017, there were $33 million of letters of credit outstanding and $267 million of available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility. The letters of credit are posted to satisfy collateral requirements under our automobile, general liability and workers’ compensation insurance program and fuel swap contracts. 

On May 11, 2017, the Company purchased $17 million in aggregate principal amount of its 7.25% notes maturing in 2038 at a price of 97% of the principal amount using available cash. The repurchased notes were delivered to the trustee for cancellation.  In connection with this partial repurchase, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $3 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.

In 2016, our board of directors authorized a three-year share repurchase program, under which we may repurchase up to $300 million of outstanding shares of our common stock. As of June 30, 2017, we have repurchased $145 million of outstanding shares under this program, which is included in treasury stock on the condensed consolidated statements of financial position.

In 2016, we settled all civil claims of the affected families related to the U.S. Virgin Islands and Florida fumigation matters, and payments in connection with those claims totaled $90 million ($56 million, net of tax). We have also sought to resolve by plea agreement the federal criminal consequences related to the U.S. Virgin Islands matter pursuant to which we expect to pay approximately $10 million. See Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for more details.

We have submitted to the IRS a voluntary correction proposal to remedy an administrative error related to our Profit Sharing and Retirement Plan. Our current estimate of the cost of the correction ranges from $25 million to approximately $93 million. See Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for more details. 

Cash and short- and long-term marketable securities include balances associated with regulatory requirements at American Home Shield. See “—Limitations on Distributions and Dividends by Subsidiaries.” American Home Shield’s investment portfolio has been invested in a combination of high-quality debt securities and equity securities. We closely monitor the performance of the investments. From time to time, we review the statutory reserve requirements to which our regulated entities are subject and any changes to such requirements. These reviews may result in identifying current reserve levels above or below minimum statutory reserve requirements, in which case we may adjust our reserves. The reviews may also identify opportunities to satisfy certain regulatory reserve requirements through alternate financial vehicles.

As of June 30, 2017, we had posted $31 million in letters of credit, which were issued under the Revolving Credit Facility, and $89 million of cash, which is included in Restricted cash on the condensed consolidated statements of financial position, as collateral under our automobile, general liability and workers’ compensation insurance program. This amount is not related to the payments made in connection with the U.S. Virgin Islands matter. We may from time to time change the amount of cash or marketable securities used to satisfy collateral requirements under our automobile, general liability and workers’ compensation insurance program.  The amount of cash or marketable securities utilized to satisfy these collateral requirements will depend on the relative cost of the issuance of letters of credit under the Revolving Credit Facility and our cash position. Any change in cash or marketable securities used as collateral would result is a corresponding change in our available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility.

Additionally, under the terms of our fuel swap contracts, we are required to post collateral in the event the fair value of the contracts exceeds a certain agreed upon liability level and in other circumstances required by the agreement with the counterparty. As of June 30, 2017, the estimated fair value of our fuel swap contracts was a net liability of less than $1 million, and we had posted $2 million in letters of credit as collateral under our fuel hedging program, which were also issued under the Revolving Credit Facility. The continued use of letters of credit for this purpose in the future could limit our ability to post letters of credit for other purposes and could limit our borrowing availability under the Revolving Credit Facility. However, we do not expect the fair value of the outstanding fuel swap contracts to materially impact our financial position or liquidity.

---

 

We may from time to time repurchase or otherwise retire or extend our debt and/or take other steps to reduce our debt or otherwise improve our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. These actions may include open market debt repurchases, negotiated repurchases, other retirements of outstanding debt and/or opportunistic refinancing of debt. The amount of debt that may be repurchased or otherwise retired or refinanced, if any, will depend on market conditions, trading levels of our debt, our cash position, compliance with debt covenants and other considerations.

Fleet and Equipment Financing Arrangements

We have entered into the Fleet Agreement which, among other things, allows us to obtain fleet vehicles through a leasing program. We expect to fulfill substantially all of our vehicle fleet needs through the leasing program under the Fleet Agreement. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, we acquired $22 million of vehicles through the leasing program under the Fleet Agreement. All leases under the Fleet Agreement are capital leases for accounting purposes. The lease rental payments include an interest component calculated using a variable rate based on one-month LIBOR plus other contractual adjustments and a borrowing margin totaling 2.45 percent. We have no minimum commitment for the number of vehicles to be obtained under the Fleet Agreement. 

Additionally, a portion of our property and equipment is leased through programs outside the scope of the Fleet Agreement. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, we acquired $1 million of property and equipment through these incremental leasing programs, which are treated as capital leases for accounting purposes. We anticipate new lease financings, including the Fleet Agreement and incremental leasing programs, for the full year 2017 will range from approximately $30 million to $40 million.

Limitations on Distributions and Dividends by Subsidiaries

We are a holding company, and as such have no independent operations or material assets other than ownership of equity interests in our subsidiaries. We depend on our subsidiaries to distribute funds to us so that we may pay obligations and expenses, including satisfying obligations with respect to indebtedness. The ability of our subsidiaries to make distributions and dividends to us depends on their operating results, cash requirements and financial condition and general business conditions, as well as restrictions under the laws of our subsidiaries’ jurisdictions.

The agreements governing the Credit Facilities may restrict the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends, make loans or otherwise transfer assets to us. Further, our subsidiaries are permitted under the terms of the Credit Facilities and other indebtedness to incur additional indebtedness that may restrict or prohibit the making of distributions, the payment of dividends or the making of loans by such subsidiaries to us.

Furthermore, there are third-party restrictions on the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to transfer funds to us. These restrictions are related to regulatory requirements at American Home Shield and to a subsidiary borrowing arrangement at SMAC. The payments of ordinary and extraordinary dividends by our home warranty and similar subsidiaries (through which we conduct our American Home Shield business) are subject to significant regulatory restrictions under the laws and regulations of the states in which they operate. Among other things, such laws and regulations require certain subsidiaries to maintain minimum capital and net worth requirements and may limit the amount of ordinary and extraordinary dividends and other payments that these subsidiaries can pay to us. As of June 30, 2017, the total net assets subject to these third-party restrictions was $194 million. We expect that such limitations will be in effect for the foreseeable future. None of our subsidiaries are obligated to make funds available to us through the payment of dividends.

We consider undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries as of June 30, 2017 to be indefinitely reinvested and, accordingly, no U.S. income taxes have been provided thereon.  The amount of cash associated with indefinitely reinvested foreign earnings was approximately $25 million and $23 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. We have not repatriated, nor do we anticipate the need to repatriate, funds to the United States to satisfy domestic liquidity needs arising in the ordinary course of business, including liquidity needs associated with our domestic debt service requirements.

Cash Flows

Cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities, as reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, are summarized in the following table.

---

 

Operating Activities

Net cash provided from operating activities from continuing operations increased $16 million to $260 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $244 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Net cash provided from operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2017 comprised $198 million in earnings adjusted for non-cash charges and a $63 million decrease in cash required for working capital (a $28 million decrease excluding the working capital impact of accrued interest, restructuring and taxes), offset, in part, by $1 million in payments related to fumigation matters. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, working capital requirements were favorably impacted by seasonal activity and the timing of income tax payments, offset, in part by incentive compensation payments related to 2016 performance.

Net cash provided from operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2016 comprised $227 million in earnings adjusted for non-cash charges and a $19 million decrease in cash required for working capital (a $29 million decrease excluding the working capital impact of accrued interest, restructuring and taxes), offset, in part, by $2 million in payments related to fumigation matters. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, working capital requirements were favorably impacted by seasonal activity, offset, in part by incentive compensation payments related to 2015 performance and timing of income tax payments.

Investing Activities

Net cash used for investing activities from continuing operations was $56 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $58 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Capital expenditures increased to $34 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 from $31 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016 and included recurring capital needs and information technology projects. We anticipate capital expenditures for the full year 2017 for recurring capital needs and the continuation of investments in information systems and productivity enhancing technology will range from approximately $50 million to $60 million.  Additionally, we expect capital needs for the full year 2017 associated with the relocation of our headquarters to be approximately $35 million for which we expect to be reimbursed through a tenant improvement allowance and grants totaling approximately $25 million for a net cash outflow of approximately $10 million. We expect to fulfill our ongoing vehicle fleet needs through vehicle capital leases. We have no additional material capital commitments at this time.

Proceeds from the sale of equipment and other assets was $7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, primarily driven by the branch conversions at Merry Maids.   In the six months ended June 30, 2016, the branches were sold for a total purchase price of $8 million for which we received cash of $6 million and provided financing of $2 million. As of October 10, 2016, the branch conversion process was complete. 

Cash payments for acquisitions for the six months  ended June 30, 2017 totaled $12 million, compared with $73 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Consideration given for the purchase of a master distributor and for tuck-in acquisitions consisted of cash payments and debt payable to sellers. In 2016, we acquired OneGuard Home Warranties for $65 million consisting of cash consideration of $55 million and deferred payments of $10 million. We expect to continue our tuck-in acquisition program at Terminix and to periodically evaluate other strategic acquisitions.

Cash flows used for purchases, sales and maturities of securities, net, for the six months  ended June 30, 2017 totaled $6 million and were driven by the purchase and maturity of marketable securities at American Home Shield. Cash flows from purchases, sales and maturities of securities, net, for the six months ended June 30, 2016 totaled $47 million and were driven by the maturity and sale of marketable securities at American Home Shield.

Cash flows used for notes receivable, net, for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 totaled $4 million and $5 million, respectively, and were a result of a net increase in financing provided by SMAC to our franchisees and retail customers of our operating units.

Financing Activities

Net cash used for financing activities from continuing operations was $124 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $45 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016.



During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we made scheduled principal payments on long-term debt of $29 million, purchased $17 million in aggregate principal amount of our 7.25% notes maturing in 2038 at a price of 97% of the principal amount, repurchased $85 million of common stock and received $7 million from the issuance of common stock upon the exercise of stock options and shares issued under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, we made scheduled principal payments on long-term debt of $33 million, repurchased $17 million of common stock and received $5 million from the issuance of common stock.

Contractual Obligations

Our 2016 Form 10-K includes disclosures of our contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2016. We continue to make the contractually required payments, and, therefore, the 2017 obligations and commitments as listed in our 2016 Form 10-K have been reduced by the required payments. 

---

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of June 30, 2017, we did not have any significant off-balance sheet arrangements.

We do not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, established for the purpose of facilitating off- balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Accordingly, we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.



Regulatory Matters

On July 21, 2016, TMX USVI and TMX LP, each an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into the Superseding Plea Agreement in connection with the investigation initiated by the DOJ into allegations that a local Terminix branch used methyl bromide as a fumigant at a resort in St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands. The Superseding Plea Agreement was intended to resolve four misdemeanor charges of violations of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act related to improper applications of methyl bromide. Those charges were set forth in an Information, dated March 29, 2016, in the matter styled United States of America v. The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership and Terminix International USVI, LLC.  At a hearing held on August 25, 2016, the District Court rejected the Superseding Plea Agreement.  On August 31, 2016, the DOJ requested that the charges be dismissed, reserving its right to re-file the charges, in light of ongoing discussions to resolve the matter. The District Court granted that request, and the March 29, 2016 Information was dismissed. 

On January 20, 2017, TMX USVI and TMX LP entered into the New Plea Agreement with the DOJ, which has been filed with the District Court, and replaces the Superseding Plea Agreement. At a hearing on March 23, 2017, TMX USVI and TMX LP pled guilty to four misdemeanor charges of violations of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act related to improper applications of methyl bromide, as set forth in a new Information filed on January 20, 2017 with the District Court that is substantially similar to the March 29, 2016 Information. Under the terms of the New Plea Agreement, the parties agreed and jointly recommended to the District Court that (i) TMX USVI and TMX LP each pay a fine of $4 million (total of $8 million); (ii) TMX USVI pay $1 million to the EPA for costs incurred by the EPA for the response and clean-up of the affected units at the resort in St. John; (iii) TMX USVI make a community service payment of $1 million to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation for the purpose of engaging a third party to provide training to pesticide applicators in the U.S. Virgin Islands; and (iv) both TMX USVI and TMX LP serve a three-year probation period, subject to the special conditions of probation under the New Plea Agreement. The total financial terms of the recommended sentence under the New Plea Agreement are equivalent in total amount to the financial terms under the Superseding Plea Agreement.  Unlike the Superseding Plea Agreement, however, the New Plea Agreement is non-binding on the District Court. The sentencing hearing before the District Court previously scheduled for July 27, 2017, has been rescheduled for September 21, 2017. It is possible that at that hearing the District Court could use its discretion to impose fines or other terms different than those in the New Plea Agreement. If approved by the District Court, and upon compliance with the terms and conditions of the New Plea Agreement, the New Plea Agreement will resolve the federal criminal consequences associated with the DOJ investigation. The New Plea Agreement does not bind any other federal, state or local authority; however, the EPA has indicated that it does not intend to initiate any administrative enforcement action or refer the matter to the DOJ for any civil enforcement action if the New Plea Agreement is approved by the District Court.  

The Company has previously recorded within Fumigation related matters in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income total charges of $10 million in connection with the aforementioned criminal matter. On December 16, 2016, the U.S. Virgin Islands Department of Justice filed a civil complaint in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands related to the aforementioned fumigation incident in a matter styled Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. The ServiceMaster Company, LLC, The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership, and Terminix International USVI, LLC. The amount and extent of any further potential penalties, fines, sanctions, costs and damages that the federal or other governmental authorities may yet impose, investigation or other costs and reputational harm, as well as the impact of any additional civil, criminal or other claims or judicial, administrative or regulatory proceedings resulting from or related to the U.S. Virgin Islands matter, which could be material, is not currently known, and any such further penalties, fines, sanctions, costs or damages would not be covered under the Company’s general liability insurance policies. 

Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements and cautionary statements, including statements with respect to the potential separation of American Home Shield from ServiceMaster and the distribution of American Home Shield shares to ServiceMaster shareholders, and approval of the U.S. Virgin Islands plea agreement. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terms such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “shall,” “should,” “would,” “could,” “seeks,” “aims,” “projects,” “is optimistic,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” “anticipates” or other comparable terms. Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to: uncertainties as to the timing of the spin-off or whether it will be completed at all, the results and impact of the announcement of the proposed spin-off, the failure to satisfy any conditions to complete the spin-off, the expected tax treatment of the spin-off, the impact of the spin-off on the businesses of ServiceMaster and American Home Shield, and the failure to achieve anticipated benefits of the spin-off.  These forward-looking statements also include, but are not limited to statements regarding our intentions, beliefs, assumptions or current expectations concerning, among other things, financial position; results of operations; cash flows; prospects; growth strategies or expectations; customer retention; the continuation

---

 

of acquisitions, including the integration of any acquired company and risks relating to any such acquired company; fuel prices; attraction and retention of key personnel; the impact of fuel swaps; the valuation of marketable securities; estimates of accruals for self-insured claims related to workers’ compensation, auto and general liability risks; estimates of accruals for home warranty claims; estimates of future payments under operating and capital leases; estimates on current and deferred tax provisions; the outcome (by judgment or settlement) and costs of legal or administrative proceedings, including, without limitation, collective, representative or class action litigation; and the impact of prevailing economic conditions.

Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which may be beyond our control. We caution you that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance or outcomes and that actual performance and outcomes, including, without limitation, our actual results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and the development of the market segments in which we operate, may differ materially from those made in or suggested by the forward-looking statements contained in this report. In addition, even if our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows, and the development of the market segments in which we operate, are consistent with the forward-looking statements contained in this report, those results or developments may not be indicative of results or developments in subsequent periods. A number of important factors, including, without limitation, the risks and uncertainties discussed in “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” above and in “Risk Factors” below, could cause actual results and outcomes to differ from those reflected in the forward-looking statements. Additional factors that could cause actual results and outcomes to differ from those reflected in forward-looking statements include, without limitation:

---

 

You should read this report completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from expectations. All forward-looking statements made in this report are qualified by these cautionary statements. These forward-looking statements are made only as of the date of this report, and we do not undertake any obligation, other than as may be required by law, to update or revise any forward-looking or cautionary statements to reflect changes in assumptions, the occurrence of events, unanticipated or otherwise, and changes in future operating results over time or otherwise.

Comparisons of results for current and any prior periods are not intended to express any future trends, or indications of future performance, unless expressed as such, and should only be viewed as historical data. 

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The economy and its impact on discretionary consumer spending, labor wages, fuel prices and other material costs, home resales, unemployment rates, insurance costs and medical costs could have a material adverse impact on future results of operations.

We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We have entered into specific financial arrangements, primarily fuel swap agreements and interest rate swap agreements, in the normal course of business to manage certain market risks, with a policy of matching positions and limiting the terms of contracts to relatively short durations. The effect of derivative financial instrument transactions could have a material impact on our financial statements.

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes and manage this exposure through the use of variable-rate and fixed-rate debt and by utilizing interest rate swaps. In our opinion, the market risk associated with debt obligations and other significant instruments as of June 30, 2017 has not materially changed from December 31, 2016 (see Item 7A of the 2016 Form 10-K).

Fuel Price Risk

We are exposed to market risk for changes in fuel prices through the consumption of fuel by our vehicle fleet in the delivery of services to our customers. We expect to use approximately 12 million gallons of fuel in 2017.  As of June 30, 2017, a ten percent change in fuel prices would result in a change of approximately $3 million in our annual fuel cost before considering the impact of fuel swap contracts. 

We use fuel swap contracts to mitigate the financial impact of fluctuations in fuel prices. As of June 30, 2017, we had fuel swap contracts to pay fixed prices for fuel with an aggregate notional amount of $33 million, maturing through 2018. The estimated fair value of these contracts as of June 30, 2017 was a net liability of less than $1 million. These fuel swap contracts provide a fixed price for approximately 97 percent and 68 percent of our estimated fuel usage for the remainder of 2017 and 2018, respectively. 

 

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

Our Chief Executive Officer, Nikhil M. Varty, and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Anthony D. DiLucente, have evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as required by Rule 13a-15(b) and Rule 15d-15(b) under the Exchange Act. Messrs. Varty and DiLucente have concluded that both the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2017.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting

No changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or Rule 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 

 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On July 21, 2016, TMX USVI and TMX LP, each an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into the Superseding Plea Agreement in connection with the investigation initiated by the DOJ into allegations that a local Terminix branch used methyl bromide as a fumigant at a resort in St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands. The Superseding Plea Agreement was intended to resolve four misdemeanor charges of violations of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act related to improper applications of methyl bromide. Those charges were set forth in an Information, dated March 29, 2016, in the matter styled United States of America v. The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership and Terminix International USVI, LLC.  At a hearing held on August 25, 2016, the District Court rejected the Superseding Plea Agreement.  On August 31, 2016, the DOJ requested that the charges be dismissed, reserving its right to re-file the charges, in light of ongoing discussions to resolve the matter. The District Court granted that request, and the March 29, 2016 Information was dismissed. 

On January 20, 2017, TMX USVI and TMX LP entered into the New Plea Agreement with the DOJ, which has been filed with the District Court, and replaces the Superseding Plea Agreement. At a hearing on March 23, 2017, TMX USVI and TMX LP pled

---

 

guilty to four misdemeanor charges of violations of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act related to improper applications of methyl bromide, as set forth in a new Information filed on January 20, 2017 with the District Court that is substantially similar to the March 29, 2016 Information. Under the terms of the New Plea Agreement, the parties agreed and jointly recommended to the District Court that (i) TMX USVI and TMX LP each pay a fine of $4 million (total of $8 million); (ii) TMX USVI pay $1 million to the EPA for costs incurred by the EPA for the response and clean-up of the affected units at the resort in St. John; (iii) TMX USVI make a community service payment of $1 million to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation for the purpose of engaging a third party to provide training to pesticide applicators in the U.S. Virgin Islands; and (iv) both TMX USVI and TMX LP serve a three-year probation period, subject to the special conditions of probation under the New Plea Agreement. The total financial terms of the recommended sentence under the New Plea Agreement are equivalent in total amount to the financial terms under the Superseding Plea Agreement.  Unlike the Superseding Plea Agreement, however, the New Plea Agreement is non-binding on the District Court. The sentencing hearing before the District Court previously scheduled for July 27, 2017, has been rescheduled for September 21, 2017. It is possible that at that hearing the District Court could use its discretion to impose fines or other terms different than those in the New Plea Agreement. If approved by the District Court, and upon compliance with the terms and conditions of the New Plea Agreement, the New Plea Agreement will resolve the federal criminal consequences associated with the DOJ investigation. The New Plea Agreement does not bind any other federal, state or local authority; however, the EPA has indicated that it does not intend to initiate any administrative enforcement action or refer the matter to the DOJ for any civil enforcement action if the New Plea Agreement is approved by the District Court.  

The Company has previously recorded within Fumigation related matters in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income total charges of $10 million in connection with the aforementioned criminal matter.  On December 16, 2016, the U.S. Virgin Islands Department of Justice filed a civil complaint in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands related to the aforementioned fumigation incident in a matter styled Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. The ServiceMaster Company, LLC, The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership, and Terminix International USVI, LLC. The amount and extent of any further potential penalties, fines, sanctions, costs and damages that the federal or other governmental authorities may yet impose, investigation or other costs and reputational harm, as well as the impact of any additional civil, criminal or other claims or judicial, administrative or regulatory proceedings resulting from or related to the U.S. Virgin Islands matter, which could be material, is not currently known, and any such further penalties, fines, sanctions, costs or damages would not be covered under the Company’s general liability insurance policies.

In addition to the matter discussed above, in the ordinary course of conducting business activities, we and our subsidiaries become involved in judicial, administrative and regulatory proceedings involving both private parties and governmental authorities. These proceedings include insured and uninsured matters that are brought on an individual, collective, representative and class action basis, or other proceedings involving regulatory, employment, general and commercial liability, automobile liability, wage and hour, environmental and other matters. We have entered into settlement agreements in certain cases, including with respect to putative collective and class actions, which are subject to court or other approvals. If one or more of our settlements are not finally approved, we could have additional or different exposure, which could be material. Subject to the paragraphs above, we do not expect any of these proceedings to have a material effect on our reputation, business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows; however, we can give no assurance that the results of any such proceedings will not materially affect our reputation, business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. See Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statement for more details.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS 



We discuss in our 2016 Form 10-K and our other filings with the SEC various risks that may materially affect our business.  In addition, you should carefully consider the factors described below and the materialization of any risks and uncertainties identified in Forward-Looking Statements contained in this report, together with those previously disclosed in the 2016 Form 10-K, and our other filings with the SEC or those that are presently unforeseen could result in significant adverse effects on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. See “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations —  Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” above. 

The proposed American Home Shield separation is subject to various risks and uncertainties, and may not be completed on the terms or timeline currently contemplated, if at all.

On July 26, 2017, we announced our plan to spin off our American Home Shield business. The separation, which is expected to be completed in the third quarter of 2018, is subject to customary conditions, including the effectiveness of a Registration Statement on Form 10 to be filed with the SEC,  receipt of a favorable ruling from the IRS concerning certain tax matters and final approval by the Company’s board of directors. There can be no assurance that the separation of American Home Shield will be completed. Unanticipated developments in the proposed separation, including with respect to covenant waivers, regulatory approvals or clearances, receipt of a favorable ruling from the IRS, uncertainty of the financial markets and challenges in establishing infrastructure or processes, could delay or prevent the completion of the proposed separation or cause the proposed separation to occur on terms or conditions that are different from those currently expected.







---

 

The proposed American Home Shield separation may be more expensive than anticipated and may not achieve some or all of the anticipated benefits.

Executing the proposed separation will require us to incur costs, and could distract the attention of our senior management and key employees, which could disrupt operations and result in the loss of business opportunities, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We may also experience increased difficulties in attracting, retaining and motivating key employees during the pendency of the separation and following its completion, which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Even if the proposed separation is completed, we may not realize some or all of the anticipated benefits from the separation and the separation may in fact adversely affect our business. Separating the businesses may result in dis-synergies that could negatively impact the balance sheet, income statement and cash flows of each business. Moreover, we may not realize some or all of the anticipated strategic, operational, marketing or other benefits from the separation.

If the proposed separation is completed, both companies will be smaller, less diversified companies with a narrower business focus and may be more vulnerable to changing market conditions and competitive pressures, which could materially and adversely affect their respective businesses, financial conditions and results of operations. There can be no assurance that the combined value of the common stock of the two publicly traded companies following the completion of the proposed separation will be equal to or greater than what the value of our common stock would have been had the proposed separation not occurred.

---

 

ITEM 2.  UNREGISTERED SALES OF REGISTERED SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Share Repurchase Program

In 2016, our board of directors authorized a three-year share repurchase program, under which we may repurchase up to $300 million of outstanding shares of our common stock. We expect to fund the share repurchases from net cash provided from operating activities. The share repurchase program is part of our capital allocation strategy that focuses on sustainable growth and maximizing shareholder value.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities



___________________________________

(1) All shares were acquired as part of our share repurchase program.



 

---

 

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS 



___________________________________



# Filed herewith. 

 



---

 

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: August 1, 2017





---