Annual Statements Open main menu

Terra Income Fund 6, LLC - Annual Report: 2022 (Form 10-K)


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2022
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Transition Period from to
Commission File Number: 000-55429
Terra Income Fund 6, LLC
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 92-0548263
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
205 West 28th Street, 12th Floor
New York, New York 10001
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(212) 753-5100
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of exchange on
which registered
7.00% Notes due 2026TFSANew York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer¨Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer
þ
Smaller reporting company
þ
Emerging growth company ¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 USC. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. o
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b).☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ☑
All of the limited liability company interest in the registrant is held by an affiliate of the registrant. No market value has been computed based upon the fact that no active trading market had been established as of the date of this document.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
None.



TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PART I
PART II
PART III
PART IV
i


SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Terra Income Fund 6, LLC (formerly “Terra Merger Sub, LLC”) (“Terra LLC”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Terra Property Trust, Inc. and the successor of Terra Income Fund 6, Inc. (“Terra BDC”), constitute forward-looking statements because they relate to future events or our future performance or financial condition. On October 1, 2022, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 2, 2022, Terra BDC merged with and into Terra LLC, with Terra LLC continuing as the surviving entity of the merger (the “Merger”). In this report, as context requires, “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Terra BDC prior to the Merger and its successor, Terra LLC, after the Merger. The forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may include, but are not limited to, statements as to:
our expected financial performance and operating results;
our ability to achieve the expected synergies, cost savings and other benefits from the Merger;
risks associated with achieving expected synergies, cost savings and other benefits from the Merger;
the availability of attractive risk-adjusted investment opportunities in our target asset class and other real estate-related investments that satisfy our objectives and strategies;
the origination or acquisition of our targeted assets, including the timing of originations or acquisitions;
volatility in our industry, interest rates and spreads, the debt or equity markets, the general economy or the real estate market specifically, whether the results of market events or otherwise;
changes in our investment objectives and business strategy;
the availability of financing on acceptable terms or at all;
the performance and financial condition of our borrowers;
changes in interest rates and the market value of our assets;
borrower defaults or decreased recovery rates from our borrowers;
changes in prepayment rates on our loans;
our use of financial leverage;
actual and potential conflicts of interest with any of the following affiliated entities: Terra Income Advisors, LLC (“Terra Income Advisors”), the investment adviser to Terra BDC prior to the Merger; Terra Capital Partners, LLC (“Terra Capital Partners”), our sponsor; Terra REIT Advisors, LLC, a subsidiary of Terra Capital Partners, and the external manager to our sole member Terra REIT (“Terra REIT Advisors” or the “REIT Manager”); Terra Fund Advisors, LLC, an affiliate of Terra Capital Partners; Terra JV, LLC, Terra Secured Income Fund 5, LLC, Terra Secured Income Fund 5 International, Terra Income Fund International and Terra Secured Income Fund 7, LLC, (collectively, the “Terra Income Funds”); Terra Offshore Funds REIT, LLC; Mavik Real Estate Special Opportunities Fund, LP; or any of their affiliates;
our dependence on the REIT Manager or its affiliates and the availability of its senior management team and other personnel;
actions and initiatives of the U.S., federal, state and local government and changes to the U.S. federal, state and local government policies and the execution and impact of these actions, initiatives and policies;
the degree and nature of our competition.
In addition, words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect” and “intend” indicate a forward-looking statement, although not all forward-looking statements include these words. The forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those implied or expressed in the forward-looking statements for any reason, including the factors set forth in “Part I — Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this Annual Report. Other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include:
changes in the economy;
risks associated with possible disruption in our operations or the economy generally due to terrorism or natural disasters; and
ii


future changes in laws or regulations and conditions in our operating areas.
We have based the forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K on information available to us on the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Except as required by the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Stockholders are advised to consult any additional disclosures that we may make directly to stockholders or through reports that we may file in the future with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K. The forward-looking statements and projections contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are excluded from the safe harbor protection provided by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).
RISK FACTOR SUMMARY
We are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results and future events to differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in our forward-looking statements, including those summarized below. The following list of risks and uncertainties is only a summary of some of the most important factors and is not intended to be exhaustive. This risk factor summary should be read together with the more detailed discussion of risks and uncertainties set forth under Item 1A — Risk Factors.
Risks Related to Our Business and Structure
Our loan portfolio is concentrated in a limited number of industries and borrowers, which may subject us to a risk of significant loss if there is a downturn in a particular industry in which we are concentrated or if one of our larger borrowers encounters financial difficulties.
Inflation in the U.S. has accelerated recently and is currently expected to continue at an elevated level in the near-to/medium-term, which may have an adverse impact on the valuation of our investments.
Terra REIT may change our operating policies, objectives or strategies without prior notice or stockholder approval, and the effects of such a change may be adverse.
Our ability to achieve our investment objectives depends on Terra REIT’s and Terra REIT Advisors’ ability to manage and support our investment process. If Terra REIT were to lose any members of its senior management team, our ability to achieve our investment objectives could be significantly harmed.
Uncertainty relating to the LIBOR calculation process may adversely affect the value of our portfolio of the LIBOR-indexed, floating-rate debt securities in our portfolio.
The Current Expected Credit Loss accounting standard could result in a significant change in how we recognize credit losses and may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Terra REIT Advisors and its Affiliates
Terra REIT Advisors and its affiliates, including some of Terra REIT’s directors, face conflicts of interest caused by compensation arrangements with us and our affiliates, which could result in actions that are not in our best interests.
There may be conflicts of interest related to obligations Terra REIT Advisors has to our affiliates and to other clients.
Risks Related to Our Investments
A covenant breach by any of our portfolio companies may harm our operating results.
A lack of liquidity in certain of our investments may adversely affect our business.
Our real estate-related loans may be impacted by unfavorable real estate market conditions, which could decrease the value of our investments.
Our real estate-related loans will be subject to interest rate fluctuations that could reduce our returns as compared to market interest rates.
The mezzanine loans in which we may invest would involve greater risks of loss than senior loans secured by income-producing real properties.
Investments in non-conforming or non-investment grade rated loans or securities involve greater risk of loss.
iii


We have no established investment criteria limiting the geographic concentration of our investments. If our investments are concentrated in an area that experiences adverse economic conditions, our investments may lose value and we may experience losses.
Hedging against interest rate exposure may adversely affect our earnings, limit our gains or result in losses.
If we overestimate the value or income-producing ability or incorrectly price the risks of our investments, we may experience losses.
Risk Related to Debt Financing
Changes in interest rates may affect our cost of capital
Risk Related to our REIT Status
If we did not qualify as a REIT during the period beginning October 1, 2018 through our short taxable year ended October 1, 2022 (the “REIT Period”), we will be subject to tax as a regular corporation and could face a substantial tax liability on our income earned during the REIT Period.
General Risk Factors
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has caused severe disruptions in the U.S and global economy, and any future pandemics or similar events, and the actions taken in response thereto, may adversely affect our investments and operations.
Future recessions, downturns, disruptions or instability could have a materially adverse effect on our business.
As a public company, we are subject to regulations not applicable to private companies, such as provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Efforts to comply with such regulations involves significant expenditures, and non-compliance with such regulations may adversely affect us.


iv



PART I
Item 1. Business.
Overview
Terra Income Fund 6, LLC (formerly “Terra Merger Sub, LLC”) (“Terra LLC”) was formed as a Delaware limited liability company on April 29, 2022 as a wholly owned subsidiary of Terra Property Trust, Inc. (“Terra REIT”). On October 1, 2022, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 2, 2022 (as amended, the “Merger Agreement”), Terra Income Fund 6, Inc. (“Terra BDC”) merged with and into Terra LLC, with Terra LLC continuing as the surviving entity of the merger (the “Merger”). Subsequent to the Merger, Terra LLC became the successor of Terra BDC and assumed all of Terra BDC’s rights and obligations. The former members of Terra BDC’s board of directors (the “Terra BDC Board”) joined the board of directors of Terra REIT. Terra LLC does not have a board of directors and Terra REIT is the sole and managing member of Terra LLC. As context requires, “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Terra BDC prior to the Merger and its successor, Terra LLC, after the Merger.
Terra BDC was a Maryland corporation, formed on May 15, 2013 and commenced operations on June 24, 2015. Terra BDC elected to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”) until it withdrew its election on September 29, 2022. Terra BDC was an externally managed, non-diversified, closed-end management investment company that initially elected to be taxed for federal income tax purposes as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) until December 31, 2018, when it changed its tax election from taxation as a RIC to taxation as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”). Terra BDC elected to be taxed as a REIT under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, commencing with its short taxable year beginning October 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2018. Concurrent with the change in its tax election, Terra BDC changed its fiscal year end from September 30 to December 31 to satisfy the REIT requirements under the Code. During the REIT Period, as a REIT we were not subject to federal income taxes on income and gains distributed to the stockholders as long as certain requirements were satisfied, principally relating to the nature of income and the level of distributions, as well as other factors.
On February 10, 2021, Terra BDC issued $34.8 million in aggregate principal amount of 7.00% fixed-rate notes due 2026 (the “notes”), for net proceeds of $33.7 million after deducting underwriting commissions of $1.1 million. In addition, the underwriters had an option to purchase an additional $5.2 million in aggregate principal amount of notes within 30 days. On February 26, 2021, the underwriters exercised the option to purchase an additional $3.6 million of the notes for net proceeds of $3.5 million, after deducting underwriting commissions of $0.1 million. Interest on the notes is paid quarterly in arrears every March 30, June 30, September 30 and December 30, at an annual rate of 7.00% per year, beginning June 30, 2021. The notes mature on March 31, 2026. The notes may be redeemed in whole or in part at any time or from time to time at our option on or after February 10, 2023.
On April 1, 2021, Mavik Capital Management, LP (“Mavik”), an entity controlled by Vikram S. Uppal, Terra REIT’s Chief Executive Officer, completed a series of related transactions that resulted in all of the outstanding interests in Terra Capital Partners, LLC (“Terra Capital Partners”) being acquired by Mavik for a combination of cash and interests in Mavik (the “Recapitalization”). Following the series of transactions described below, Terra Income Advisors is ultimately controlled by Mavik. Prior to the Recapitalization, Terra Capital Partners was the immediate parent and managing member of Terra Income Advisors, and was ultimately controlled by Axar Real Estate Capital Group LLC (“Axar RE Manager”). In connection with the Recapitalization, Axar RE Manager assumed direct control of Terra Income Advisors by becoming its manager. Thus, the same parties that controlled Terra Income Advisors prior to the consummation of the Recapitalization maintained control of Terra Income Advisors, and by the terms of the Recapitalization continued to do so until a new investment advisory and administrative services agreement between Terra BDC and Terra Income Advisors (the “Investment Advisory Agreement”) was approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at Terra BDC’s 2021 annual meeting of stockholders on September 22, 2021. Subsequent to the approval of the Investment Advisory Agreement, Axar RE Manager ceased to be the manager of Terra Income Advisors and Terra Capital Partners again became the managing member of Terra Income Advisors.
Terra BDC was also responsible for future payments of the servicing fee to selected dealers under a servicing plan (the “Servicing Plan”) as a result of the assignment of certain administrative functions and other obligations under the second amended and restated dealer manager agreement between it and Terra Capital Markets, LLC.
Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, on October 1, 2022, except for any shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Terra BDC (“Terra BDC Common Stock”) held by Terra REIT or any wholly owned subsidiary of Terra REIT or Terra BDC, which shares were automatically retired and ceased to exist with no consideration paid therefor, each issued and outstanding share of Terra BDC Common Stock was automatically cancelled and retired and converted into the right to receive (i) 0.595 shares of the newly designated Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Terra REIT (“Class B
1



Common Stock”) and (ii) cash, without interest, in lieu of any fractional shares of Class B Common Stock otherwise issuable in an amount, rounded to the nearest whole cent, determined by multiplying (x) the fraction of a share of Class B Common Stock to which such holder would otherwise be entitled by (y) $14.38.
Pursuant to the terms of the transactions described in the Merger Agreement, 4,847,910 shares of Class B Common Stock were issued to former Terra BDC stockholders in connection with the Merger. Following the consummation of the Merger, former Terra BDC stockholders own approximately 19.9% of the common equity of Terra REIT as the combined company.
In connection with the Merger, we assumed the obligations of Terra BDC under the indenture of the unsecured notes payable as well as the credit agreement to provide for a delayed draw term loan of up to $25.0 million. Additionally, the Investment Advisory Agreement between Terra BDC and Terra Income Advisors and the Servicing Plan were terminated on October 1, 2022 and fees pursuant to such agreements are no longer payable. These advisory fees are now payable by our parent and sole managing member, Terra REIT, to its external manager, Terra REIT Advisors, pursuant to the amended and restated management agreement, dated as of February 8, 2018 (the “Management Agreement”), by and between Terra REIT and Terra REIT Advisors. We have entered into a cost sharing and reimbursement agreement (the “Cost Sharing Agreement”) with Terra REIT pursuant to which we will be responsible for our allocable share of Terra REIT’s expenses, including fees paid by Terra REIT to its manager. Terra REIT’s investment objective is to provide attractive risk-adjusted returns to its stockholders, primarily through regular distributions. There can be no assurances that Terra REIT will be successful in meeting its investment objective.
Terra BDC’s Investment Adviser
Terra BDC’s investment activities were externally managed by Terra Income Advisors, or the “Adviser”, a private investment firm affiliated with Terra BDC, pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement, under the oversight of the Terra BDC Board, a majority of whom were independent. Terra Income Advisors is registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”). Under the Investment Advisory Agreement, Terra BDC agreed to pay Terra Income Advisors a base management fee as well as an incentive fee based on its investment performance.
Terra Income Advisors was responsible for sourcing potential investments, conducting due diligence on prospective investments, analyzing investment opportunities, structuring investments and monitoring Terra BDC’s portfolio on an ongoing basis according to asset allocation and other guidelines set by the Terra BDC Board. Terra Income Advisors is registered as an investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The level of Terra BDC’s investment activity depended on many factors, including the amount of debt and equity capital available to prospective borrowers, the level of refinancing activity for such companies, the availability of credit to finance transactions, the general economic environment and the competitive environment for the types of investments Terra BDC made.
The management of Terra BDC’s investment portfolio was the responsibility of Terra Income Advisors and its executive officers. The investment committee of Terra Income Advisors approved each new investment that Terra BDC made. The Terra BDC Board, including a majority of independent directors, oversaw and monitored Terra BDC’s investment performance and annually reviewed the compensation Terra BDC paid to Terra Income Advisors and its performance during the preceding 12 months to determine if the compensation paid to Terra Income Advisors was reasonable in relation to the nature and quality of the services performed, and that the provisions of the Investment Advisory Agreement were carried out.
As discussed above, in connection with the Merger, the Investment Advisory Agreement between Terra BDC and Terra Income Advisors was terminated on October 1, 2022 and fees pursuant to such agreement are no longer payable. These advisory fees are now payable by our parent and sole managing member, Terra REIT, to its external manager, Terra REIT Advisors, pursuant to the Management Agreement. We have entered into the Cost Sharing Agreement pursuant to which we are responsible for our allocable share of Terra REIT’s expenses, including fees paid by Terra REIT to Terra REIT Advisors.
About Terra Capital Partners
Terra Capital Partners, an affiliate of Terra Income Advisors and Terra REIT Advisors, is a real estate finance and investment firm based in New York City that focuses primarily on the origination and management of commercial real estate-related loans, including mezzanine loans, as well as first mortgage loans, bridge loans and preferred equity investments, in all major property types. Since its formation in 2001 and its commencement of operations in 2002, Terra Capital Partners has been engaged in providing financing on commercial properties of all major property types throughout the United States. In the lead up to the global financial crisis in 2007, believing that the risks associated with commercial real estate markets had grown out of proportion to the potential returns from such markets, Terra Capital Partners sold 100% of its interest in its portfolio. It was not until mid-2009, after its assessment that commercial mortgage markets would begin a period of stabilization and growth, that Terra Capital Partners began to sponsor new investment vehicles, which included the Terra Income Funds, to again provide
2



debt capital to commercial real estate markets. The financings provided by all vehicles managed by Terra Capital Partners from January 2004 through December 31, 2022 have been secured by approximately 13.9 million square feet of office properties, 3.7 million square feet of retail properties, 5.9 million square feet of industrial properties, 5,058 hotel rooms and 28,493 apartment units. The value of the properties underlying this capital was approximately $11.2 billion based on appraised values as of the closing dates of each financing. In addition to its extensive experience originating and managing debt financings, Terra Capital Partners and its affiliates have owned and operated over six million square feet of office and industrial space between 2005 and 2007, and this operational experience further informs its robust origination and underwriting standards and would be beneficial should Terra REIT Advisors need to foreclose on a property underlying a financing. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, Terra Capital Partners and its affiliates employed 27 persons.
    Terra Capital Partners is led by Vikram S. Uppal (Chief Executive Officer), Gregory M. Pinkus (Chief Financial Officer) and Daniel J. Cooperman (Chief Originations Officer). Mr. Uppal was a Partner of Axar and its Head of Real Estate. Prior to Axar, Mr. Uppal was a Managing Director on the Investment Team at Fortress Investment Group’s Credit and Real Estate Funds and Co-Head of North American Real Estate Investments at Mount Kellett Capital Management. Members of the Terra Capital Partners management team have broad based, long-term relationships with major financial institutions, property owners and commercial real estate service providers. The entire senior management team has held leadership roles at many top international real estate and investment banking firms, including Mount Kellett Capital Management and Fortress Investment Group.
Investment Objectives and Strategy
We are a wholly owned subsidiary of Terra REIT and our investment objective is to provide attractive risk-adjusted returns to Terra REIT’s stockholders, primarily through Terra REIT’s regular distributions. We structure, acquire and maintain a portfolio of investments that generate a stable income stream. We directly structure, underwrite and originate most of our investments, as we believe that doing so will provide us with the best opportunity to invest in loans that satisfy our standards, establish a direct relationship with the borrower and optimize the terms of our investments; however, we may acquire existing loans from the originating lender should our adviser determine such an investment is in our best interest. We may hold our investments until their scheduled maturity dates or may sell them if we are able to command favorable terms for their disposition. We may also seek to realize growth in the value of our investments by timing their sale to maximize value.
Terra REIT Advisors’ management team has extensive experience in originating, acquiring, structuring, managing and disposing of real estate-related loans similar to the types of loans in which we intend to invest. In order to meet our investment objectives, we generally seek to follow the following investment criteria:
focus primarily on the origination of new loans;
focus on loans backed by properties in the United States;
invest primarily in floating rate rather than fixed rate loans, but we reserve the right to make debt investments that bear interest at a fixed rate;
invest in loans expected to be repaid within one to five years;
maximize current income;
lend to creditworthy borrowers;
construct a portfolio that is diversified by property type, geographic location, tenancy and borrower;
source off-market transactions; and
hold investments until maturity unless, in Terra REIT Advisors’ judgment, market conditions warrant earlier disposition.
While the size of each of our investments generally range between $3 million and $20 million, our investments ultimately are at the discretion of Terra REIT Advisors, subject to oversight by Terra REIT’s board of directors (the “Terra REIT Board”). We focus on smaller, middle market loans which are financing properties in primary and secondary markets because we believe these loans are subject to less competition, offer higher risk adjusted returns than larger loans with similar risk metrics and facilitate portfolio diversification.
3



To enhance our returns, we employ leverage, including leverage resulting from issuance of the notes, as market conditions permit and at the discretion of Terra REIT Advisors. See Item 1A “Risk Factors — Risk Related to Debt Financing” for a discussion of the risks inherent in employing leverage.
Our Business Strategy
In executing our business strategy, we believe that we benefited from Terra REIT Advisors’ affiliation with Terra Capital Partners, given its strong track record and extensive experience and capabilities as real estate investment manager and sponsor of the Terra Income Funds. We believe the following core strengths enable us to realize our investment objectives and provided us with significant competitive advantages in the marketplace, and attractive risk-adjusted returns to Terra REIT’s stockholders.
Significant Experience of Terra Capital Partners
Terra Capital Partners provides Terra REIT Advisors with all of its key investment personnel. Terra Capital Partners has developed a reputation within the commercial real estate finance industry as a leading sophisticated real estate investment and asset management company with a 19-year track record in originating, underwriting and managing commercial real estate and real estate-related loans, preferred equity investments and investments with similar characteristics to the assets that we acquire. We believe we benefit from the depth and the disciplined approach Terra Capital Partners brings to its underwriting and investment management processes to structure and manage investments prudently. In addition to its extensive experience originating and managing debt financings, Terra Capital Partners and its affiliates have owned and operated over six million square feet of office and industrial space between 2005 and 2007, and this operational experience has further informed its robust origination and underwriting standards.
Disciplined Investment Process
    We follow a disciplined investment origination, underwriting and selection process. We follow an investment approach focused on long-term credit performance and capital protection. This investment approach involves a multi-phase evaluation, structuring and monitoring process for each potential investment opportunity. After investment, our management team focuses on a thorough review of our investments for potential credit quality deterioration and potential proactive steps to mitigate any losses to our invested capital. We believe this approach maximizes current income and minimizes capital loss. To date, all of the loans originated by Terra REIT Advisors and its affiliates have generated a positive return, which we believe is attributable to its rigorous origination, underwriting and selection process.
Portfolio Construction
We construct a portfolio that is diversified by property type, geographic location and borrower. We construct our portfolio based on our evaluation of the impact of each potential investment on the risk/reward mix in our existing portfolio. By selecting those assets that we believe will maximize returns while minimizing investment-specific risk, we believe we can build and manage an investment portfolio that provides superior value to Terra REIT’s stockholders over time, both in absolute terms and relative to other commercial real estate loan and real estate-related investment vehicles.
Superior Analytical Approach
We believe that our management team possesses the superior analytical approach to evaluate each potential investment through the balanced use of qualitative and quantitative analysis, which helps us manage risk on an individual investment and portfolio basis. We rely on a variety of analytical approach and models to assess our investments and risk management. We also conduct an extensive evaluation of the numerous factors that affect our potential investments. These factors include:
Top-down review of both the current macroeconomic environment generally and the real estate and commercial real estate loan market specifically;
Detailed evaluation of the real estate industry and its sectors;
Bottom-up review of each individual investment’s attributes and risk/reward profile relative to the macroeconomic environment;
Quantitative cash flow analysis and impact of the potential investment on our portfolio; and
Ongoing management and monitoring of all investments to assess changing conditions on our original investment assumptions.
4



Extensive Strategic Relationships
Our management team maintains extensive relationships within the real estate industry, including real estate developers, institutional real estate sponsors and investors, real estate funds, investment and commercial banks, private equity funds, asset originators and broker-dealers, as well as the capital and financing markets generally. We believe these relationships enhance our ability to source and finance our investments as well as mitigate their credit and interest rate risk. We leverage the many years of experience and well-established contacts of our management team, and use these relationships for the benefit of Terra REIT’s stockholders.
Targeted Investments
Real Estate-Related Loans
    We originate, acquire, fund and structure real estate-related loans, including first and second mortgage loans, mezzanine loans, bridge loans, convertible mortgages and other loans related to high-quality commercial real estate in the United States. We may also acquire some equity participations in the underlying collateral of such loans. We invest in securities that are rated below investment grade by rating agencies or that would be rated below investment grade if they were rated. Below investment grade securities, which are often referred to as “junk,” have predominantly speculative characteristics with respect to the issuer’s capacity to pay interest and repay principal. They may also be difficult to value and illiquid. We structure, underwrite and originate most if not all of our investments. We use what we consider to be conservative underwriting criteria, and our underwriting process involves comprehensive financial, structural, operational and legal due diligence to assess the risks of investments so that we can optimize pricing and structuring. By originating loans directly, we are able to structure and underwrite loans that satisfy our standards, establish a direct relationship with the borrower and utilize our own documentation. Described below are some of the types of loans we own and may originate.
    Mezzanine Loans. These are loans secured by ownership interests in an entity that owns commercial real estate and generally finance the acquisition, refinancing, rehabilitation or construction of commercial real estate. Mezzanine loans may be either short-term (one-to-five year) or long-term (up to 10-year) and may be fixed or floating rate. We may originate mezzanine loans backed by high-quality properties in the United States that fit our investment strategy. We may own such mezzanine loans directly or we may hold a participation in a mezzanine loan or a sub-participation in a mezzanine loan. These loans are predominantly current-pay loans (although there may be a portion of the interest that accrues) and may provide for participation in the value or cash flow appreciation of the underlying property as described below. We invest in mezzanine loans with loan-to-value ratios ranging from 60% to 80%.
    Preferred Equity Investments. These are investments in preferred membership interests in an entity that owns commercial real estate and generally finance the acquisition, refinancing, rehabilitation or construction of commercial real estate. These investments are expected to have similar characteristics to and returns as mezzanine loans.
    Subordinated Mortgage Loans (B-notes). B-notes include structurally subordinated first mortgage loans and junior participations in first mortgage loans or participations in these types of assets. Like first mortgage loans, these loans generally finance the acquisition, refinancing, rehabilitation or construction of commercial real estate. B-notes may be either short-term (one-to-five year) or long-term (up to 10-year), may be fixed or floating rate and are predominantly current-pay loans. We may originate current-pay B-notes backed by high-quality properties in the United States that fit our investment strategy. We may create B-notes by tranching our directly originated first mortgage loans generally through syndications of senior first mortgages or buying such assets directly from third-party originators.
    Investors in B-notes are compensated for the increased risk of such assets from a pricing perspective but still benefit from a lien on the related property. Investors typically receive principal and interest payments at the same time as senior debt unless a default occurs, in which case these payments are made only after any senior debt is made whole. Rights of holders of B-notes are usually governed by participation and other agreements that, subject to certain limitations, typically provide the holders of subordinated positions of the mortgage loan with the ability to cure certain defaults and control certain decisions of holders of senior debt secured by the same properties (or otherwise exercise the right to purchase the senior debt), which provides for additional downside protection and higher recoveries.
    Bridge Loans. We offer bridge financing products to borrowers who are typically seeking short-term capital to be used in an acquisition, development or refinancing of a given property. From the borrower’s perspective, shorter term bridge financing is advantageous because it allows time to improve the property value through repositioning without encumbering it with restrictive long-term debt. The terms of these loans generally do not exceed three years. Bridge loans may be structured as mezzanine loans, preferred equity or first mortgages.    
5



    First Mortgage Loans. These loans generally finance the acquisition, refinancing, rehabilitation or construction of commercial real estate. First mortgage loans may be either short-term (one-to-five year) or long-term (up to 10-year), may be fixed or floating rate and are predominantly current-pay loans. We originate current-pay first mortgage loans backed by high-quality properties in the United States that fit our investment strategy. We selectively syndicate portions of these loans, including senior or junior participations that will effectively provide permanent financing or optimize returns which may include retained origination fees.
    First mortgages provide for a higher recovery rate and lower defaults than other debt positions due to the lender’s senior position. However, such loans typically generate lower returns than subordinate debt such as mezzanine loans or B-notes.
    Equity Participations. In connection with our loan origination activities, we may pursue equity participation opportunities, or interests in the projects being financed, in instances when we believe that the risk-reward characteristics of the loan merit additional upside participation because of the possibility of appreciation in value of the underlying assets securing the loan. Equity participations can be paid in the form of additional interest, exit fees or warrants in the borrower. Equity participation can also take the form of a conversion feature, permitting the lender to convert a loan or preferred equity investment into equity in the borrower at a negotiated premium to the current net asset value (“NAV”) of the borrower. We expect to be able to obtain equity participations in certain instances where the loan collateral consists of an asset that is being repositioned, expanded or improved in some fashion which is anticipated to improve future cash flow. In such case, the borrower may wish to defer some portion of the debt service or obtain higher leverage than might be merited by the pricing and leverage level based on historical performance of the underlying asset. We generate additional revenues from these equity participations as a result of excess cash flows being distributed or as appreciated properties are sold or refinanced.
    Other Real Estate-Related Investments. Terra REIT Advisors has the right to invest in other real estate-related investments, which may include CMBS or other real estate debt or equity securities. Certain of our real estate-related loans require the borrower to make payments of interest on the fully committed principal amount of the loan regardless of whether the full loan amount is outstanding.
Human Capital Management
We do not currently have any employees and do not expect to have any employees. Services necessary for our business are provided by individuals who are employees of Terra Capital Partners, our sponsor, or by individuals who are contracted by Terra Capital Partners to work on behalf of us pursuant to the terms of the Management Agreement.
Regulation
Terra BDC elected to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act until it withdrew its election on September 29, 2022. As with other companies regulated by the 1940 Act, a BDC must adhere to certain substantive regulatory requirements. The 1940 Act contains prohibitions and restrictions relating to transactions between BDCs and their affiliates (including any investment advisers or sub-advisers), principal underwriters and affiliates of those affiliates or underwriters and requires that a majority of the directors be persons other than “interested persons,” as that term is defined in the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act provides that a BDC may not change the nature of its business so as to cease to be, or to withdraw its election as, a BDC unless approved by a majority of its outstanding voting securities.
“A majority of the outstanding voting securities” of a company is defined under the 1940 Act as the lesser of: (i) 67% or more of the voting securities of such company present at a meeting if the holders of more than 50% of the company’s outstanding voting securities are present or represented by proxy; or (ii) more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of such company. Terra BDC secured the majority approval of its outstanding voting securities to withdraw its election as a BDC on September 12, 2022.
Terra BDC’s Qualifying Assets
Under the 1940 Act, a BDC may not acquire any asset other than assets of the type listed in Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act, which are referred to as qualifying assets, unless, at the time the acquisition is made, qualifying assets represent at least 70% of the company’s total assets. The principal categories of qualifying assets that were relevant to Terra BDC’s business are the following:
1.Securities purchased in transactions not involving any public offering from the issuer of such securities, which issuer (subject to certain limited exceptions) is an eligible portfolio company, or from any person who is, or has been during the preceding 13 months, an affiliated person of an eligible portfolio company, or from any other person, subject to such rules as may be prescribed by the SEC. An eligible portfolio company is defined in the 1940 Act as any issuer which:
6



a.is organized under the laws of, and has its principal place of business in, the United States;
b.is not an investment company (other than a small business investment company wholly owned by the BDC) or a company that would be an investment company but for certain exclusions under the 1940 Act; and
c.satisfies any of the following:
i.does not have any class of securities that is traded on a national securities exchange;
ii.has a class of securities listed on a national securities exchange, but has an aggregate market value of outstanding voting and non-voting common equity of less than $250 million;
iii.is controlled by a BDC or a group of companies including a BDC and the BDC has an affiliated person who is a director of the eligible portfolio company;
iv.is a small and solvent company having total assets of not more than $4 million and capital and surplus of not less than $2 million; or
v.meets such other criteria as may be established by the SEC.
2.Securities of any eligible portfolio company that Terra BDC control.
3.Securities purchased in a private transaction from a U.S. issuer that is not an investment company or from an affiliated person of the issuer, or in transactions incident thereto, if the issuer is in bankruptcy and subject to reorganization or if the issuer, immediately prior to the purchase of its securities, was unable to meet its obligations as they came due without material assistance other than conventional lending or financing arrangements.
4.Securities of an eligible portfolio company purchased from any person in a private transaction if there is no ready market for such securities and Terra BDC already owned 60% of the outstanding equity of the eligible portfolio company.
5.Securities received in exchange for or distributed on or with respect to securities described in (1) through (4) above, or pursuant to the exercise of warrants or rights relating to such securities.
6.Cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment.
Control, as defined by the 1940 Act, is presumed to exist where a BDC beneficially owns more than 25% of the outstanding voting securities of the portfolio company.
In addition, a BDC must have been organized and have its principal place of business in the United States and must be operated for the purpose of making investments in the types of securities in eligible portfolio companies, or in other securities that are consistent with its purpose as a BDC.
Managerial Assistance to Portfolio Companies
In order to count portfolio securities as qualifying assets for the purpose of the 70% test, Terra BDC must have either controlled the issuer of the securities or must have offered to make available to the issuer of the securities (other than small and solvent companies described above) significant managerial assistance; except that, where Terra BDC purchased such securities in conjunction with one or more other persons acting together, one of the other persons in the group may have made available such managerial assistance. Making available significant managerial assistance means, among other things, any arrangement whereby the BDC, through its directors, officers or employees, offers to provide, and, if accepted, does so provide, significant guidance and counsel concerning the management, operations or business objectives and policies of a portfolio company.
Terra Income Advisors or its affiliates may have provided such managerial assistance on Terra BDC’s behalf to portfolio companies that requested this assistance, recognizing that Terra BDC’s involvement with each investment would vary based on factors including the size of the company, the nature of its investment, the company’s overall stage of development and Terra BDC’s relative position in the capital structure. Terra BDC may have received fees for these services.
Terra BDC’s Temporary Investments
Pending investment in other types of “qualifying assets,” as described above, Terra BDC’s investments may have consisted of cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time
7



of investment, which Terra BDC referred to, collectively, as temporary investments, so that 70% of its assets were qualifying assets. Terra BDC typically invested in U.S. Treasury bills or in repurchase agreements, provided that such agreements were fully collateralized by cash or securities issued by the U.S. government or its agencies. A repurchase agreement involves the purchase by an investor, such as Terra BDC, of a specified security and the simultaneous agreement by the seller to repurchase it at an agreed-upon future date and at a price that is greater than the purchase price by an amount that reflects an agreed-upon interest rate. There was no percentage restriction on the proportion of Terra BDC’s assets that may have been invested in such repurchase agreements.
Terra BDC’s Indebtedness and Senior Securities
As a BDC, Terra BDC was permitted, under specified conditions, to issue multiple classes of indebtedness and one class of stock senior to its common stock if its asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least equal to 200% immediately after each such issuance. In addition, while any senior securities remained outstanding, Terra BDC must have generally made provisions to prohibit any distribution to its stockholders or the repurchase of such securities or stock unless it met the applicable asset coverage ratios at the time of the distribution or repurchase. Terra BDC may have also borrowed amounts up to 5% of the value of its total assets for temporary or emergency purposes without regard to asset coverage.
Terra BDC’s Common Stock
As a BDC, Terra BDC was subject to certain regulatory restrictions in making its investments. For example, Terra BDC may have been prohibited under the 1940 Act from knowingly participating in certain transactions with its affiliates without the prior approval of the Terra BDC Board who were not interested persons and, in some cases, prior approval by the SEC. The SEC granted Terra BDC exemptive relief permitting it, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, to co-invest in certain privately negotiated investment transactions with certain affiliates of Terra Income Advisors, including the Terra Income Funds, Terra REIT, and any future BDC or closed-end management investment company that was registered under the 1940 Act and was advised by Terra Income Advisors or its affiliated investment advisers (the “Co-Investment Affiliates”). However, Terra BDC was prohibited from engaging in certain transactions with its affiliates even under the terms of this exemptive order. Terra BDC believed this relief not only enhanced its ability to further its investment objectives and strategy, but may have also increased favorable investment opportunities for it, in part by allowing it to participate in larger investments, together with its Co-Investment Affiliates, than would have been available to it if it had not obtained such relief.
Terra BDC’s Co-Investments
As a BDC, Terra BDC was subject to certain regulatory restrictions in making its investments. For example, Terra BDC may have been prohibited under the 1940 Act from knowingly participating in certain transactions with its affiliates without the prior approval of the Terra BDC Board who were not interested persons and, in some cases, prior approval by the SEC. The SEC granted Terra BDC exemptive relief permitting it, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, to co-invest in certain privately negotiated investment transactions with certain affiliates of Terra Income Advisors, including the Terra Income Funds, Terra REIT, and any future BDC or closed-end management investment company that was registered under the 1940 Act and was advised by Terra Income Advisors or its affiliated investment advisers (the “Co-Investment Affiliates”). However, Terra BDC was prohibited from engaging in certain transactions with its affiliates even under the terms of this exemptive order. Terra BDC believed this relief not only enhanced its ability to further its investment objectives and strategy, but may have also increased favorable investment opportunities for it, in part by allowing it to participate in larger investments, together with its Co-Investment Affiliates, than would have been available to it if it had not obtained such relief.
Terra BDC’s Compliance Policies and Procedures
As a BDC, Terra BDC and Terra Income Advisors each adopted and implemented written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violation of the federal securities laws and were required to review those compliance policies and procedures annually for their adequacy and the effectiveness of their implementation. Terra BDC’s Chief Compliance Officer and the chief compliance officer of Terra Income Advisors were responsible for administering those policies and procedures.
Terra BDC’s Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures
Terra BDC delegated its proxy voting responsibility to Terra Income Advisors. The proxy voting policies and procedures of Terra Income Advisors are set forth below. The guidelines were reviewed periodically by Terra Income Advisors and Terra
8



BDC’s disinterested directors. For purposes of these proxy voting policies and procedures described below, “we” “our” and “us” refer to Terra Income Advisors.
Proxy Policies
As an investment adviser registered under the Advisers Act, we have a fiduciary duty to act solely in the best interests of our clients. As part of this duty, we recognize that we must vote client securities in a timely manner free of conflicts of interest and in the best interests of our clients.
These policies and procedures for voting proxies for our investment advisory clients are intended to comply with Section 206 of, and Rule 206(4)-6 under, the Advisers Act.
We vote proxies relating to our portfolio securities in the best interests of our clients’ stockholders. We review on a case-by-case basis each proposal submitted to a stockholder vote to determine its impact on the portfolio securities held by our clients. Although we generally vote against proposals that may have a negative impact on our clients’ portfolio securities, we may vote for such a proposal if there exist compelling long-term reasons to do so.
Our proxy voting decisions are made by the senior officers who are responsible for monitoring each of our client’s investments. To ensure that our vote is not the product of a conflict of interest, we require that: (i) anyone involved in the decision making process disclose to our Chief Compliance Officer any potential conflict that he or she is aware of and any contact that he or she has had with any interested party regarding a proxy vote; and (ii) employees involved in the decision making process or vote administration are prohibited from revealing how we intend to vote on a proposal in order to reduce any attempted influence from interested parties.
Proxy Voting Records
Investors may obtain information, without charge, regarding how Terra Income Advisors voted proxies with respect to our portfolio securities by making a written request for proxy voting information to: Chief Compliance Officer, Bernadette Murphy.
Available Information
We are required to file with or submit to the SEC annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information meeting the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. We maintain a website at http://www.terrafund6.com, on which we make available, free of charge, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K and investors should not consider information contained on our website to be part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any other report we file with the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information filed electronically by us with the SEC, which are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

9



Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Investing in our notes involves certain risks relating to our structure and investment objectives. Investors should carefully consider these risk factors, together with all of the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes. The risks set forth below are not the only risks we face, and we may face other risks that we have not yet identified, which we do not currently deem material or which are not yet predictable. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of the notes could decline, and investors may lose all or part of their investment.
Risks Related to Our Business and Structure
Our loan portfolio is concentrated in a limited number of industries and borrowers, which may subject us to a risk of significant loss if there is a downturn in a particular industry in which we are concentrated or if one of our larger borrowers encounters financial difficulties. For example, as of December 31, 2022, our investments secured by mixed-use and office properties represented approximately 34.8% and 19.5%, respectively, of the carrying value of our total loan investments, we held only nine loan investments, our largest loan investment represented approximately 19.5% of the carrying value of our total loan investments and our top three loan investments represented approximately 54.8% of the carrying value of our total loan investments.
Our portfolio is concentrated in a limited number of industries and borrowers, and, as a result, a downturn in any particular industry or borrower in which we are heavily invested may significantly impact the aggregate returns we realize. If an industry in which we are heavily invested suffers from adverse business or economic conditions, a material portion of our investment could be affected adversely, which, in turn, could adversely affect our financial position and results of operations. As of December 31, 2022, our investments secured by mixed use and office properties represented approximately 34.8% and 19.5%, respectively, of the carrying value of our total loan investments. In addition, as of December 31, 2022, we held only ten loan investments and our largest loan investment represented approximately 19.5% of the carrying value of our total loan investments and our top three loan investments represented approximately 54.8% of the carrying value of our total loan investments. A covenant breach or other adverse event effecting a borrower would have a more weighted impact on our operating results and would require a write-down of a larger percentage of our assets.
Inflation in the U.S. has accelerated recently and is currently expected to continue at an elevated level in the near-to medium-term, which may have an adverse impact on the valuation of our investments.

Inflation in the U.S. has accelerated recently and is currently expected to continue at an elevated level in the near-to medium-term. Further, heightened competition for workers, supply chain issues, the relocation of foreign production and manufacturing businesses to the U.S., and rising energy and commodity prices have contributed to increasing wages and other economic inputs. Higher inflation and rising input costs may have adverse effects on our commercial real estate-related loans, commercial real estate-related debt securities and select commercial real estate equity investments, which are subject to the risks typically associated with real estate. Inflation can negatively impact the profitability of real estate assets with long-term leases that do not provide for short-term rent increases or that provide for rent increases with a lower annual percentage increase than inflation. Continued inflation, particularly at higher levels, may have an adverse impact on the valuation of our investments.
Terra REIT may change our operating policies, objectives or strategies without prior notice, and the effects of such a change may be adverse.
Terra REIT has the authority to modify or waive our current operating policies, objectives or investment criteria and strategies without prior notice. We cannot predict the effect any changes to our current operating policies, investment criteria and strategies would have on our business, operating results and the value of the notes. However, the effects might be adverse, which could negatively impact our ability to pay principal and interest payments on the notes.
Our ability to achieve our investment objectives depends on Terra REIT’s and Terra REIT Advisors’ ability to manage and support our investment process. If Terra REIT were to lose any members of its senior management team, our ability to achieve our investment objectives could be significantly harmed.
Since we have no employees, we depend on the investment expertise, skill and network of business contacts of Terra REIT, which evaluates, negotiates, structures, executes, monitors and services our investments. Our future success depends to a significant extent on the continued service and coordination of Terra REIT and its senior management team. The departure of
10



any members of Terra REIT’s senior management team could have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment objectives.
Our ability to achieve our investment objectives also depends on the ability of Terra REIT Advisors, the external manager to our sole member, Terra REIT, to identify, analyze, invest in, finance and monitor companies that meet our investment criteria. Terra REIT Advisors’ capabilities in structuring the investment process, providing competent, attentive and efficient services to us and Terra REIT, and facilitating access to financing on acceptable terms depend on the employment of investment professionals in an adequate number and of adequate sophistication to match the corresponding flow of transactions. To achieve our investment objectives, Terra REIT Advisors may need to hire, train, supervise and manage new investment professionals to participate in our investment selection and monitoring process. Terra REIT Advisors may not be able to find investment professionals in a timely manner or at all. Failure to support our investment process could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, the management agreement between Terra REIT and Terra REIT Advisors has termination provisions that allow the parties to terminate the agreement without penalty. The termination of this agreement may adversely impact the terms of any financing facility into which we may enter, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Because our business model depends to a significant extent upon relationships with real estate and real estate-related industry participants, investment banks and commercial banks, the inability of Terra REIT or Terra REIT Advisors to maintain or develop these relationships, or the failure of these relationships to generate investment opportunities, could adversely affect our business.
We expect that Terra REIT and Terra REIT Advisors will depend on their relationships with real estate and real estate-related industry participants, investment banks and commercial banks, and we will rely to a significant extent upon these relationships, to provide us with potential investment opportunities. If Terra REIT or Terra REIT Advisors fail to maintain their existing relationships or develop new relationships or sources of investment opportunities, we may not be able to grow our investment portfolio. In addition, individuals with whom Terra REIT and Terra REIT Advisors have relationships are not obligated to provide us with investment opportunities, and therefore there is no assurance that such relationships will generate investment opportunities for us.
We may face increasing competition for investment opportunities, which could delay deployment of our capital, reduce returns and result in losses.
We compete for investments with other alternative investment funds (including real estate and real estate-related investment funds, mezzanine funds and collateralized loan obligation funds), as well as traditional financial services companies such as commercial banks and other sources of funding. Moreover, alternative investment vehicles, such as hedge funds, have begun to invest in areas in which they have not traditionally invested, including assets of the type we intend to acquire. As a result of these new entrants, competition for investment opportunities in private real estate and real estate-related U.S. companies may intensify.
Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. These characteristics could allow our competitors to consider a wider variety of investments, establish more relationships and demand more favorable investment terms and more flexible structuring than we are able to do. We may lose investment opportunities if we do not match our competitors’ pricing, terms and structure. If we are forced to match our competitors’ terms and structure, we may not be able to achieve acceptable returns on our investments or may bear substantial risk of capital loss.
Changes in laws or regulations governing our operations or the operations of our business partners may adversely affect our business or cause us to alter our business strategy.
We and our portfolio companies are subject to regulation at the local, state and federal level. New legislation may be enacted or new interpretations, rulings or regulations could be adopted, including those governing the types of investments we are permitted to make, any of which could harm us and holders of the notes, potentially with retroactive effect. Changes in laws or regulations governing the operations of those with whom we do business could also have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, any changes to the laws and regulations governing our operations relating to permitted investments may cause us to alter our investment strategy to avail ourselves of new or different opportunities. Such changes could result in material differences to our strategies and plans as set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and may result in our investment focus shifting from the areas of expertise of Terra REIT Advisors to other types of investments in which Terra REIT Advisors may
11



have less expertise or little or no experience. Thus, any such changes, if they occur, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and the value of each investor’s investment.
The expected discontinuance of the London interbank offered rate (“LIBOR”) and transition to alternative reference rates may adversely impact our borrowings and assets.
As of December 31, 2022, approximately $44.8 million of our investment portfolio, or approximately 36.9% of the carrying value of our total loan investments, included an interest rate that was indexed to LIBOR, all of which are subject to a LIBOR floor. The United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”), which regulates LIBOR, has announced that the most commonly used tenors (overnight and one, three, six and 12 months) will cease to be published or will no longer be representative after June 30, 2023. The FCA’s announcement coincided with the March 5, 2021 announcement of LIBOR’s administrator, the ICE Benchmark Administration Limited (“IBA”), indicating that, as a result of not having access to input data necessary to calculate LIBOR tenors relevant to us on a representative basis after June 30, 2023, IBA would have to cease publication of such LIBOR tenors immediately after the last publication on June 30, 2023. These announcements mean that any of our LIBOR-based borrowings and assets that mature beyond June 30, 2023 need to be converted to alternative interest rates.

The Alternative Reference Rates Committee (“ARRC”), a group of private-market participants convened by the U.S. Federal Reserve Board and the New York Federal Reserve, has recommended the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”), a broad measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight collateralized by Treasury securities, as a more robust reference rate alternative to U.S. dollar LIBOR. The use of SOFR as a substitute for U.S. dollar LIBOR is voluntary and may not be suitable for all market participants. To approximate economic equivalence to LIBOR, SOFR can be compounded over a relevant term and a spread adjustment may be added. There are significant differences between LIBOR and SOFR, such as LIBOR being an unsecured lending rate while SOFR is a secured lending rate, and SOFR is an overnight rate while LIBOR reflects term rates at different maturities. If our LIBOR-based borrowings are converted to SOFR, the differences between LIBOR and SOFR, plus the recommended spread adjustment, could result in interest costs that are higher than if LIBOR remained available, which could have a material adverse effect on our results. Although SOFR is the ARRC's recommended replacement rate, it is also possible that lenders may instead choose alternative replacement rates that may differ from LIBOR in ways similar to SOFR or in other ways that would result in higher borrowing costs for us. It is not yet possible to predict the magnitude of LIBOR’s end on our borrowing costs given the uncertainty about which rates will replace LIBOR and the timing of actual replacement. Market practices related to SOFR calculation conventions continue to develop and may vary, and inconsistent calculation conventions may develop among financial products.

We are not able to predict when LIBOR will cease to be available and it is not possible to predict all consequences of the IBA’s proposals to cease publishing LIBOR, any related regulatory actions and the expected discontinuance of the use of LIBOR as a reference rate for financial contracts. If such debt or loan assets mature after LIBOR ceases to be published, our counterparties may disagree with us about how to calculate or replace LIBOR. Even when robust fallback language is included, there can be no assurance that the replacement rate plus any spread adjustment will be economically equivalent to LIBOR, which could result in a higher interest rate being paid by us on our borrowings and a lower interest rate being paid to us on such assets. Modifications to any debt, loan assets, interest rate hedging transactions or other contracts to replace LIBOR with an alternative reference rate could result in adverse tax consequences. In addition, any resulting differences in interest rate standards among our assets and our financing arrangements may result in interest rate mismatches between our assets and the borrowings used to fund such assets.

We and other market participants have less experience understanding and modeling SOFR-based assets and liabilities than LIBOR-based assets and liabilities, increasing the difficulty of investing, hedging, and risk management. Because the impact of LIBOR cessation is dependent on unknown future facts, the language of individual contracts, and the outcome of potential future legislation or litigation, it is not currently practical for our valuation models to account for the cessation of LIBOR.

The process of transition involves operational risks. References to LIBOR may be embedded in computer code or models, and we may not identify and correct all of those references. Because compounded SOFR is backward-looking rather than forward-looking, parties making or receiving LIBOR-based payments may be unable to calculate payment amounts until the day that payment is due. Proposed mechanisms to solve the operational timing issue may result in a payment amount that does not fully reflect interest rates during the calculation period.
Potential changes, or uncertainty related to such potential changes, may also adversely affect the market for LIBOR-based loans or the cost of our borrowings. In addition, changes or reforms to the determination or supervision of LIBOR may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in reported LIBOR, which could have an adverse impact on the market for LIBOR-based loans, including the value of the LIBOR-indexed, floating-rate loans in our portfolio, or the cost of our borrowings. There is no guarantee that a transition from LIBOR to an alternative will not result in financial market disruptions, significant
12



increases in benchmark rates, or borrowing costs to borrowers, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and our cash flows.
We may experience fluctuations in our quarterly results.
We could experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to a number of factors, including our ability or inability to make investments in companies that meet our investment criteria, the interest rate payable on the debt securities we originate and acquire, the level of our expenses, variations in and the timing of the recognition of realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which we encounter competition in our markets and general economic conditions. As a result of these factors, results for any previous period should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in future periods.

The Current Expected Credit Loss (“CECL”) accounting standard could result in a significant change in how we recognize credit losses and may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”) which replaces the current “incurred loss” model for recognizing credit losses with an “expected loss” model referred to as the CECL model. We adopted this ASU and related amendments on January 1, 2023. Under the CECL model, we are required to present certain financial assets carried at amortized cost, such as loans held for investment and held-to-maturity debt securities, at the net amount expected to be collected. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. This measurement will take place at the time the financial asset is first added to the balance sheet and periodically thereafter. This differs significantly from the “incurred loss” model required under current United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”), which delays recognition until it is probable a loss has been incurred. The adoption of ASU 2016-13 resulted in an incremental reserve of approximately $0.7 million, which included reserve on future loan funding commitments. Accordingly, the adoption of the CECL model may materially affect how we determine our allowance for credit losses and require us to increase our allowance. If we are required to materially increase our level of allowance for credit losses for any reason, such increase could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our ability to maintain the security of customer, associate, third-party or company information could have an impact on our reputation and our results.
We have been, and likely will continue to be, subject to computer hacking, acts of vandalism or theft, malware, computer viruses or other malicious codes, phishing, employee error or malfeasance, catastrophes, unforeseen events or other cyber-attacks. To date, we have seen no material impact on our business or operations from these attacks or events. Any future significant compromise or breach of our data security, whether external or internal, or misuse of customer, associate, supplier or Company data, could result in significant costs, lost sales, fines, lawsuits, and damage to our reputation. However, the ever-evolving threats mean we and our third-party service providers and vendors must continually evaluate and adapt our respective systems and processes and overall security environment, as well as those of any companies we acquire. There is no guarantee that these measures will be adequate to safeguard against all data security breaches, system compromises or misuses of data. In addition, as the regulatory environment related to information security, data collection and use, and privacy becomes increasingly rigorous, with new and constantly changing requirements applicable to our business, compliance with those requirements could also result in additional costs.

We are subject to environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) risks that could adversely affect our reputation, business,
operations and earnings.
Certain organizations that provide corporate risk information to investors and shareholders have developed scores and ratings to evaluate companies based upon various ESG metrics. Currently, there are no universal standards for such scores or ratings, but ESG evaluations are increasingly being integrated into investment analysis. Views about ESG matters are diverse and rapidly changing, and companies are facing increasing scrutiny from regulators, investors, and other stakeholders related to their ESG practices and disclosure. If we fail to adapt to or comply with regulatory requirements or investor or stakeholder ESG standards, our reputation, ability to do business with certain partners, access to capital, operations and earnings could be adversely affected.
13



Risks Related to Terra REIT Advisors and its Affiliates
Terra REIT Advisors and its affiliates, including some of Terra REIT’s directors, face conflicts of interest caused by compensation arrangements with us and our affiliates, which could result in actions that are not in our best interests.
Pursuant to the Cost Sharing Agreement, Terra REIT Advisors and its affiliates receive substantial fees in return for their services to us, and these fees could influence the advice provided to us. Among other matters, the compensation arrangements could affect their judgment with respect to public offerings of equity by us, and consequently Terra REIT Advisors to earn increased asset management fees. In addition, the decision to utilize leverage will increase our assets and, as a result, will increase the amount of management fees payable to Terra REIT Advisors.
There may be conflicts of interest related to obligations Terra REIT Advisors has to our affiliates and to other clients.
Terra REIT Advisors, our parent’s external manager, and its affiliates serve as investment advisers or managers to other entities that share the same senior management and investment teams. As a result, the members of the senior management and investment teams of Terra REIT Advisors serve as officers, directors or principals of entities that operate in the same or a related line of business as we do, or of investment funds managed by the same personnel. In serving in these multiple and other capacities, they may have obligations to other clients or investors in those entities, the fulfillment of which may not be in our best interests or in the best interest of our security holders. Our investment objectives may overlap with the investment objectives of such investment funds, accounts or other investment vehicles. As a result, Terra REIT Advisors and its affiliates, their employees and certain of their affiliates will have conflicts of interest in allocating their time between us and other activities in which they are or may become involved. Terra REIT Advisors and its employees will devote only as much of its or their time to our business as Terra REIT Advisors and its employees, in their judgment, determine is reasonably required, which may be substantially less than their full time.
The time and resources that individuals employed by Terra REIT Advisors and its affiliates devote to us may be diverted, and we may face additional competition due to the fact that individuals employed by Terra REIT Advisors are not prohibited from raising money for or managing another entity that makes the same types of investments that we target.
Neither Terra REIT Advisors nor individuals employed by it are prohibited from raising money for and managing another investment entity that makes the same types of investments as those we target. As a result, the time and resources that these individuals may devote to us may be diverted. In addition, we may compete with any such investment entity for the same investors and investment opportunities.
Risks Related to Our Investments
A covenant breach by any of our borrowers may harm our operating results.
A borrower’s failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, termination of its loans and foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize a borrower’s ability to meet its obligations under the debt or equity securities that we hold. We may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms, which may include the waiver of certain financial covenants, with a defaulting borrower.
We may not realize gains from our preferred equity investments.
The preferred equity investments we make may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline in value. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our preferred equity investments, and any gains that we do realize on the disposition of any preferred equity investments may not be sufficient to offset any other losses we experience.
A lack of liquidity in certain of our investments may adversely affect our business.
We invest in certain real estate and real estate-related companies whose securities are not publicly traded or actively traded on the secondary market and are, instead, traded on a privately negotiated over-the-counter secondary market for institutional investors and whose securities are subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or are otherwise less liquid than publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of certain of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell these investments when desired. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we had previously recorded these investments. The reduced liquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to dispose of them at a favorable price, and, as a result, we may suffer losses.
14



We may not have the funds or ability to make additional funding in our loan investments.
We may not have the funds or ability to make additional funding in our loan investments. After our initial funding in a loan, we may be called upon from time to time to provide additional funds to such company or have the opportunity to increase our investment. There is no assurance that we will make, or will have sufficient funds to make, follow-on investments. Any decisions not to make a follow-on investment or any inability on our part to make such an investment may have a negative impact on a loan investment in need of such an investment, may result in a missed opportunity for us to increase our participation in a successful operation or may reduce the expected return on the investment.
Our real estate-related loans may be impacted by unfavorable real estate market conditions, which could decrease the value of our investments.
The real estate-related loans we make or invest in will be at risk of defaults caused by many conditions beyond our control, including local and other economic conditions affecting real estate values and interest rate levels. We do not know whether the values of the property securing the real estate-related loans will remain at the levels existing on the dates of origination of such loans. If the values of the underlying properties drop, our risk will increase and the value of our investments may decrease.
Our real estate-related loans will be subject to interest rate fluctuations that could reduce our returns as compared to market interest rates.
If we invest in fixed-rate, long-term real estate-related loans and interest rates rise, such loans could yield a return lower than then-current market rates. If interest rates decrease, we will be adversely affected to the extent that real estate-related loans are prepaid, because we may not be able to make new loans at the previously higher interest rate. If we invest in floating-rate loans, the income from such loans will increase and decrease directly with the fluctuation in the floating rate.
Delays in liquidating defaulted mortgage loans could reduce our investment returns.
If there are defaults under our mortgage loans, we may not be able to repossess and sell the underlying properties quickly. The resulting time delay could reduce the value of our investment in the defaulted mortgage loans. An action to foreclose on a property securing a mortgage loan is regulated by state statutes and rules and is subject to many of the delays and expenses of other lawsuits if the mortgagor raises defenses or counterclaims. In the event of default by a mortgagor, these restrictions, among other things, may impede our ability to foreclose on or sell the mortgaged property or to obtain proceeds sufficient to repay all amounts due to us on the mortgage loan.
Returns on our real estate-related loans may be limited by regulations.
Our loan investments may be subject to regulation by federal, state and local authorities and subject to various laws and judicial and administrative decisions. We may determine not to make or invest in real estate-related loans in any jurisdiction in which we believe we have not complied in all material respects with applicable requirements. If we decide not to make or invest in real estate-related loans in several jurisdictions, it could reduce the amount of income we would otherwise receive.
Foreclosures create additional ownership risks that could adversely impact our returns on mortgage investments.
If we acquire property by foreclosure following defaults under our mortgage loans, we will have the same economic and liability risks as the previous owner.
The mezzanine loans in which we may invest would involve greater risks of loss than senior loans secured by income-producing real properties.
We may invest in mezzanine loans that take the form of subordinated loans secured by second mortgages on the underlying real property or loans secured by a pledge of the ownership interests of the entity owning the real property. These types of investments involve a higher degree of risk than long-term senior mortgage lending secured by income-producing real property because the investment may become unsecured as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. In the event of a bankruptcy of the entity providing the pledge of its ownership interests as security, we may not have full recourse to the assets of such entity, or the assets of the entity may not be sufficient to satisfy our mezzanine loan. If a borrower defaults on our mezzanine loan or debt senior to our loan, or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, our mezzanine loan will be satisfied only after the senior debt. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investment. In addition, mezzanine loans may have higher loan-to-value ratios than conventional mortgage loans, resulting in less equity in the real property and increasing the risk of loss of principal.
15



Our commercial real estate-related loans, commercial real estate-related debt securities and select commercial real estate equity investments will be subject to the risks typically associated with real estate.
Our commercial real estate-related loans, commercial real estate-related debt securities and select commercial real estate equity will generally be directly or indirectly secured by a lien on real property (or the equity interests in an entity that owns real property) that, upon the occurrence of a default on the loan, could result in our acquiring ownership of the property. We will not know whether the values of the properties ultimately securing our loans will remain at the levels existing on the dates of origination of those loans. If the values of the mortgaged properties drop, our risk will increase because of the lower value of the security associated with such loans. In this manner, real estate values could impact the values of our loan investments. Our investments in commercial real estate-related loans, commercial real estate-related debt securities and select commercial real estate equity investments (including potential investments in real property) may be similarly affected by real estate property values. Therefore, our investments will be subject to the risks typically associated with real estate.
The value of real estate may be adversely affected by a number of risks, including:
natural disasters such as hurricanes, earthquakes and floods;
acts of war or terrorism, including the consequences of terrorist attacks;
adverse changes in national and local economic and real estate conditions;
an oversupply of (or a reduction in demand for) space in the areas where particular properties are located and the attractiveness of particular properties to prospective tenants;
changes in governmental laws and regulations, fiscal policies and zoning ordinances and the related costs of compliance therewith and the potential for liability under applicable laws;
costs of remediation and liabilities associated with environmental conditions affecting properties; and
the potential for uninsured or underinsured property losses.
The value of each property is affected significantly by its ability to generate cash flow and net income, which in turn depends on the amount of rental or other income that can be generated net of expenses required to be incurred with respect to the property. Many expenditures associated with properties (such as operating expenses and capital expenditures) cannot be reduced when there is a reduction in income from the properties. These factors may have a material adverse effect on the ability of our borrowers to pay their loans, as well as on the value that we can realize from assets we originate, own or acquire.
Risks of cost overruns and non-completion of the construction or renovation of the properties underlying loans we make or acquire may materially adversely affect our investment.
The renovation, refurbishment or expansion by a borrower under a mortgaged or leveraged property involves risks of cost overruns and non-completion. Costs of construction or improvements to bring a property up to standards established for the market position intended for that property may exceed original estimates, possibly making a project uneconomical. Other risks may include environmental risks and construction, rehabilitation and subsequent leasing of the property not being completed on schedule. If such construction or renovation is not completed in a timely manner, or if it costs more than expected, the borrower may experience a prolonged impairment of net operating income and may not be able to make payments on our investment.
Our investments in commercial real estate-related loans are subject to changes in credit spreads.
Our investments in commercial real estate-related loans are subject to changes in credit spreads. When credit spreads widen, the economic value of such investments decrease. Even though a loan may be performing in accordance with its loan agreement and the underlying collateral has not changed, the economic value of the loan may be negatively impacted by the incremental interest foregone from the widened credit spread.
Investments in non-conforming or non-investment grade rated loans or securities involve greater risk of loss.
Some of our investments may not conform to conventional loan standards applied by traditional lenders and either will not be rated or will be rated as non-investment grade by the rating agencies. In addition, we may invest in securities that are rated below investment grade by rating agencies or that would be likely rated below investment grade if they were rated. Below investment grade securities, which are often referred to as “junk,” have predominantly speculative characteristics with respect to the issuer’s capacity to pay interest and repay principal. They may also be difficult to value and illiquid. The non-investment grade ratings for these assets typically result from the overall leverage of the loans, the lack of a strong operating history for the
16



properties underlying the loans, the borrowers’ credit history, the properties’ underlying cash flow or other factors. As a result, these investments may have a higher risk of default and loss than investment grade-rated assets. Any loss we incur may be significant and may reduce cash available for principal and interest payments on the notes and adversely affect the value of our securities.
Investments that are not U.S. government insured involve risk of loss.
We may originate and acquire uninsured loans and assets as part of our investment strategy. Such loans and assets may include mortgage loans, mezzanine loans and bridge loans. While holding such interests, we are subject to risks of borrower defaults, bankruptcies, fraud, losses and special hazard losses that are not covered by standard hazard insurance. In the event of any default under loans, we bear the risk of loss of principal and nonpayment of interest and fees to the extent of any deficiency between the value of the collateral and the principal amount of the loan.
We have no established investment criteria limiting the geographic concentration of our investments in commercial real estate-related loans, commercial real estate-related debt securities and select commercial real estate equity investments. If our investments are concentrated in an area that experiences adverse economic conditions, our investments may lose value and we may experience losses.
Certain commercial real estate-related loans, commercial real estate-related debt securities and select commercial real estate equity investments in which we invest may be secured by a single property or properties in one geographic location. Further, we intend that our secured investments will be collateralized by properties located solely in the United States. These investments may carry the risks associated with significant geographical concentration. As a result, properties underlying our investments may be overly concentrated in certain geographic areas, and we may experience losses as a result. A worsening of economic conditions in the geographic area in which our investments may be concentrated could have an adverse effect on our business, including reducing the demand for new financings, limiting the ability of customers to pay financed amounts and impairing the value of our collateral.
We may invest in adjustable rate mortgage loans, which may entail greater risks of default to lenders than fixed rate mortgage loans.
Adjustable rate mortgage loans may contribute to higher delinquency rates. Borrowers with adjustable rate mortgage loans may be exposed to increased monthly payments if the related mortgage interest rate adjusts upward from the initial fixed rate or a low introductory rate, as applicable, in effect during the initial period of the mortgage loan to the rate computed in accordance with the applicable index and margin. This increase in borrowers’ monthly payments, together with any increase in prevailing market interest rates, after the initial fixed rate period, may result in significantly increased monthly payments for borrowers with adjustable rate mortgage loans, which may make it more difficult for the borrowers to repay the loan or could increase the risk of default of their obligations under the loan.
Prepayments can adversely affect the yields on our investments.
Prepayments on debt instruments, where permitted under the debt documents, are influenced by changes in current interest rates and a variety of economic, geographic and other factors beyond our control, and consequently, such prepayment rates cannot be predicted with certainty. If we are unable to invest the proceeds of such prepayments received or are forced to invest at yields lower than those on the debt instrument that was prepaid, the yield on our portfolio will decline. In addition, we may acquire assets at a discount or premium and if the asset does not repay when expected, our anticipated yield may be impacted. Under certain interest rate and prepayment scenarios we may fail to recoup fully our cost of acquisition of certain investments.
Hedging against interest rate exposure may adversely affect our earnings, limit our gains or result in losses, which could adversely affect cash available for distribution to our stockholders and principal and interest payments on the notes.
We may enter into interest rate swap agreements or pursue other interest rate hedging strategies. Our hedging activity will vary in scope based on the level of interest rates, the type of portfolio investments held and other changing market conditions.
Any hedging activity we engage in may adversely affect our earnings, which could adversely affect cash available for distribution to our stockholders and principal and interest payments on the notes. Therefore, while we may enter into such transactions to seek to reduce interest rate risks, unanticipated changes in interest rates may result in poorer overall investment performance than if we had not engaged in any such hedging transactions. In addition, the degree of correlation between price movements of the instruments used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the portfolio positions being hedged or liabilities being hedged may vary materially. Moreover, for a variety of reasons, we may not seek to establish a perfect correlation between such hedging instruments and the portfolio holdings being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from achieving the intended hedge and expose us to risk of loss.
17



Hedging instruments often are not traded on regulated exchanges or guaranteed by an exchange or its clearing house and involve risks and costs.
The cost of using hedging instruments increases as the period covered by the instrument increases and during periods of rising and volatile interest rates. We may increase our hedging activity and thus increase our hedging costs during periods when interest rates are volatile or rising and hedging costs have increased. In addition, hedging instruments involve risk since they often are not traded on regulated exchanges or guaranteed by an exchange or its clearing house. Furthermore, the enforceability of agreements underlying derivative transactions may depend on compliance with applicable statutory, commodity and other regulatory requirements and, depending on the identity of the counterparty, applicable international requirements.
Furthermore, derivative transactions are subject to increasing statutory and other regulatory requirements and, depending on the identity of the counterparty, applicable international requirements. Recently, new regulations have been promulgated by U.S. and foreign regulators attempting to strengthen oversight of derivative contracts. Any actions taken by regulators could constrain our strategy and could increase our costs, either of which could materially and adversely impact our operations.
The business failure of a hedging counterparty with whom we enter into a hedging transaction will most likely result in a default. Default by a party with whom we enter into a hedging transaction may result in the loss of unrealized profits and force us to cover our resale commitments, if any, at the then current market price. It may not always be possible to dispose of or close out a hedging position without the consent of the hedging counterparty, and we may not be able to enter into an offsetting contract in order to cover our risk. We cannot assure investors that a liquid secondary market will exist for hedging instruments purchased or sold, and we may be required to maintain a position until exercise or expiration, which could result in losses.
Our investments in debt securities and preferred equity securities will be subject to the specific risks relating to the particular issuer of the securities and may involve greater risk of loss than secured debt financings.
Our investments in debt securities and preferred and common equity securities involve special risks relating to the particular issuer of the securities, including the financial condition and business outlook of the issuer. Real estate company issuers are subject to the inherent risks associated with real estate and real estate-related investments discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Issuers that are debt finance companies are subject to the inherent risks associated with structured financing investments also discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Furthermore, debt securities and preferred and common equity securities may involve greater risk of loss than secured debt financings due to a variety of factors, including that such investments are generally unsecured and may also be subordinated to other obligations of the issuer. As a result, investments in debt securities and preferred and common equity securities are subject to risks of (i) limited liquidity in the secondary trading market, (ii) substantial market price volatility resulting from changes in prevailing interest rates, (iii) subordination to the prior claims of banks and other senior lenders to the issuer, (iv) the operation of mandatory sinking fund or call or redemption provisions during periods of declining interest rates that could cause the issuer to reinvest redemption proceeds in lower yielding assets, (v) the possibility that earnings of the issuer may be insufficient to meet its debt service and distribution obligations and (vi) the declining creditworthiness and potential for insolvency of the issuer during periods of rising interest rates and economic downturn. These risks may adversely affect the value of outstanding debt securities and preferred and common equity securities and the ability of the issuers thereof to make principal, interest and distribution payments to us.
Declines in the market values of our investments may adversely affect periodic reported results of operations and credit availability, which may reduce our earnings and, in turn, cash available for principal and interest payments on the notes.
A decline in the market value of our assets will reduce our earnings in the period recognized and may adversely affect us particularly in instances where we have borrowed money based on the market value of those assets. If the market value of those assets declines, the lender may require us to post additional collateral to support the loan. If we were unable to post the additional collateral, we may have to sell assets at a time when we might not otherwise choose to do so. A reduction in credit available may reduce our earnings and, in turn, cash available for principal and interest payments on the notes.
Further, credit facility providers may require us to maintain a certain amount of cash reserves or to set aside unlevered assets sufficient to maintain a specified liquidity position, which would allow us to satisfy our collateral obligations. As a result, we may not be able to leverage our assets as fully as we would choose, which could reduce our return on equity. In the event that we are unable to meet these contractual obligations, our financial condition could deteriorate rapidly.
Market values of our investments may decline for a number of reasons, such as changes in prevailing market rates, increases in defaults, increases in voluntary prepayments for those investments that we have that are subject to prepayment risk, widening of credit spreads and downgrades of ratings of the securities by ratings agencies.
18



With respect to mortgaged properties, options and other purchase rights may affect value or hinder recovery.
A borrower under certain mortgage loans may give its tenants or another person a right of first refusal or an option to purchase all or a portion of the related mortgaged property. These rights may impede the lender’s ability to sell the related mortgaged property at foreclosure or may adversely affect the value or marketability of the property.
If we overestimate the value or income-producing ability or incorrectly price the risks of our investments, we may experience losses.
Analysis of the value or income-producing ability of a commercial property is highly subjective and may be subject to error. We value our potential investments based on yields and risks, taking into account estimated future losses on the commercial real estate-related loans and the mortgaged property included in the securitization’s pools or select commercial real estate equity investments, and the estimated impact of these losses on expected future cash flows and returns. In the event that we underestimate the risks relative to the price we pay for a particular investment, we may experience losses with respect to such investment.
The leases on the properties underlying our investments may not be renewed on favorable terms.
The properties underlying our investments could be negatively impacted by deteriorating economic conditions and weaker rental markets. Upon expiration or earlier termination of leases on these properties, the space may not be relet or, if relet, the terms of the renewal or reletting (including the cost of required renovations or concessions to tenants) may be less favorable than current lease terms. In addition, poor economic conditions may reduce a tenant’s ability to make rent payments under their leases. Any of these situations may result in extended periods where there is a significant decline in revenues or no revenues generated by these properties. Additionally, if market rental rates are reduced, property-level cash flows would likely be negatively affected as existing leases renew at lower rates. If the leases for these properties cannot be renewed for all or substantially all of the space at these properties, or if the rental rates upon such renewal or reletting are significantly lower than expected, the value of our investments may be adversely affected.
A borrower’s form of entity may cause special risks or hinder our recovery.
Since most of the borrowers for our commercial real estate loan investments are legal entities rather than individuals, our risk of loss may be greater than those of mortgage loans made to individuals. Unlike individuals involved in bankruptcies, most of the entities generally do not have personal assets and creditworthiness at stake. The terms of the mortgage loans generally require that the borrowers covenant to be single-purpose entities, although in some instances the borrowers are not required to observe all covenants and conditions that typically are required in order for them to be viewed under standard rating agency criteria as “single-purpose entities.”
The bankruptcy of a borrower, or a general partner or managing member of a borrower, may impair the ability of the lender to enforce its rights and remedies under the related mortgage. Borrowers that are not single-purpose entities structured to limit the possibility of becoming insolvent or bankrupt may be more likely to become insolvent or the subject of a voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy proceeding because the borrowers may be (i) operating entities with a business distinct from the operation of the mortgaged property with the associated liabilities and risks of operating an ongoing business or (ii) individuals that have personal liabilities unrelated to the property.
We may be exposed to environmental liabilities with respect to properties to which we take title.
In the course of our business, we may take title to real estate, and, if we do take title, we could be subject to environmental liabilities with respect to these properties. In such a circumstance, we may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage, personal injury, and investigation and clean-up costs incurred by these parties in connection with environmental contamination, or may be required to investigate or clean up hazardous or toxic substances, or chemical releases, at a property. The costs associated with investigation or remediation activities could be substantial. If we ever become subject to significant environmental liabilities, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Risk Related to Debt Financing
Changes in interest rates may affect our cost of capital
We use debt to finance investments, our net investment income will depend, in part, upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the rate at which we invest those funds. As a result, we can offer no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our net investment income. In periods of rising interest
19



rates when we have debt outstanding, our cost of funds will increase, which could reduce our net investment income. We expect that any long-term fixed rate investments we acquire will be financed primarily with equity and long-term debt. We may use interest rate risk management techniques in an effort to limit our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. These techniques may include various interest rate hedging activities. These activities may limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to the hedged portfolio. Adverse developments resulting from changes in interest rates or hedging transactions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, we have limited experience in entering into hedging transactions, and we will initially have to purchase or develop such expertise. A rise in the general level of interest rates can be expected to lead to higher interest rates applicable to our debt investments.
Risk Related to our REIT Status
If we did not qualify as a REIT during the REIT Period, we will be subject to tax as a regular corporation and could face a substantial tax liability on our income earned during the REIT Period.
We elected to operate so as to qualify as a REIT under the Code during the REIT Period. However, qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Code provisions for which only a limited number of judicial or administrative interpretations exist. Notwithstanding the availability of cure provisions in the Code, we could have failed various compliance requirements and could have jeopardized our REIT status. If we failed to qualify as a REIT during the REIT Period, then:
we would be taxed as a regular domestic corporation during the REIT Period, ineligible to deduct dividends paid to our stockholders in computing taxable income and would be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates during the REIT Period; and
any resulting tax liability could be substantial and could have a material adverse effect on our value.
General Risk Factors
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has caused severe disruptions in the U.S and global economy, and any future pandemics or similar events, and the actions taken in response thereto, may adversely affect our investments and operations.

In March 2020, the World Health Organization publicly characterized the outbreak of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused, and may continue to cause, significant disruptions to the U.S. and global economy and cause significant volatility and negative pressure in the financial markets. During the early part of the pandemic, the U.S. and global economy came under severe pressure due to numerous factors, including measures taken by governing authorities to prevent the spread of COVID-19, such as instituting quarantines, restrictions on travel, school closures, bans on public events and on public gatherings, “shelter in place” or “stay at home” rules, restrictions on types of business that may continue to operate, and/or restrictions on types of construction projects that may continue. Many of such restrictions have long since been lifted, and the unprecedented global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic appears to have largely subsided. Nevertheless, the negative impacts of COVID-19 on the U.S. and global economy were quite severe and recovery is still in progress.
As a result of a significant portion of our investments being in preferred equity of entities that own, mezzanine loans, first mortgages, or credit facilities secured by, office, multifamily, infrastructure and mixed-use properties located in the United States, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic may impact our investments and operating results to the extent that it reduces occupancy, increases the cost of operation or results in limited hours or necessitates the closure of such properties. The borrowers under the mezzanine loans, first mortgages, credit facilities or preferred equity in which we invest may fail to make timely and required payments under the terms of such instruments.
The world-wide economic downturn resulting from the coronavirus pandemic could negatively impact our investments and operations, as well as our ability to make principal and interest payments on the notes. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts our investments and operations will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the future rate of occurrence or mutation of COVID-19, changes in governmental responses to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, and the effectiveness of responsive actions taken in the United States and other countries to contain and manage the disease. Public and private responses to the pandemic may lead to deterioration of economic conditions, an economic downturn or a recession at a global scale, which could materially affect our performance, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Any other pandemics or similar events in the future could also similarly have a material adverse effect on our investments and operations, as well as our ability to make principal and interest payments on the notes.
20



Future recessions, downturns, disruptions or instability could have a materially adverse effect on our business.
From time to time, the global capital markets may experience periods of disruption and instability, which could cause disruptions in liquidity in the debt capital markets, significant write-offs in the financial services sector, the re-pricing of credit risk in the broadly syndicated credit market and the failure of major financial institutions. Despite actions of U.S. and foreign governments, these events could contribute to worsening general economic conditions that materially and adversely impact the broader financial and credit markets and reduce the availability of debt and equity capital for the market as a whole and financial services firms in particular.
Deterioration of economic and market conditions in the future could negatively impact credit spreads as well as our ability to obtain financing, particularly from the debt markets.
Concerns over U.S. fiscal policy could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In prior years, financial markets were affected by significant uncertainty relating to the stability of U.S. fiscal and budgetary policy. Any continuing uncertainty, together with the continuing U.S. debt and budget deficit concerns, could contribute to a U.S. economic slowdown. The impact of U.S. fiscal uncertainty is inherently unpredictable and could adversely affect U.S. and global financial markets and economic conditions. These developments could cause interest rates and borrowing costs to rise, which may negatively impact our ability to access the debt markets on favorable terms. Continued adverse economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Changes in laws or regulations governing our operations or the operations of our business partners may adversely affect our business or cause us to alter our business strategy.
We and our portfolio companies are subject to regulation at the local, state and federal level. New legislation may be enacted or new interpretations, rulings or regulations could be adopted, including those governing the types of investments we are permitted to make, any of which could harm us and our stockholders, potentially with retroactive effect. Changes in laws or regulations governing the operations of those with whom we do business could also have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, any changes to the laws and regulations governing our operations relating to permitted investments may cause us to alter our investment strategy to avail ourselves of new or different opportunities. Such changes could result in material differences to our strategies and plans as set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and may result in our investment focus shifting from the areas of expertise of Terra REIT Advisors to other types of investments in which Terra REIT Advisors may have less expertise or little or no experience. Thus, any such changes, if they occur, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and our value.
As a public company, we are subject to regulations not applicable to private companies, such as provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Efforts to comply with such regulations involves significant expenditures, and non-compliance with such regulations may adversely affect us.
As a public company, we are subject to regulations not applicable to private companies, including provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the related rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC. Our management is required to report on our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and rules and regulations of the SEC thereunder. We are required to review on an annual basis our internal control over financial reporting, and on a quarterly and annual basis, to evaluate and disclose changes in our internal control over financial reporting. This process diverts management’s time and attention. We cannot be certain as to the impact of our evaluation, testing and remediation actions on our operations, and we may not be able to ensure that the process is effective or that our internal control over financial reporting is or will be effective in a timely manner. In the event that we are unable to maintain an effective system of internal controls and maintain or achieve compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and related rules, we may be adversely affected.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
Item 2. Properties.
Our administrative and principal executive offices are located at 205 West 28th Street, 12th Floor, New York, New York 10001. We believe that our office facilities are suitable and adequate for our business as it is presently conducted.
21



Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
Neither we nor Terra REIT nor Terra REIT Advisors is currently subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge, are material legal proceedings threatened against us, Terra REIT or Terra REIT Advisors. From time to time, we and individuals employed by Terra REIT and Terra REIT Advisors may be a party to certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings relating to the enforcement of our rights under contracts with our portfolio companies. While the outcome of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not expect that these proceedings will have a material effect upon our financial condition or results of operations.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
We are a wholly owned subsidiary of Terra REIT. Accordingly, there is no market for our equity.
Item 6. [Reserved].

Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and related notes thereto and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
Terra LLC was formed as a Delaware limited liability company on April 29, 2022 as a wholly owned subsidiary of Terra REIT. On October 1, 2022, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, dated as of May 2, 2022, Terra BDC merged with and into Terra LLC, with Terra LLC continuing as the surviving entity of the Merger. Subsequent to the Merger, Terra LLC became the successor of Terra BDC and assumed all of Terra BDC’s rights and obligations. The former members of the Terra BDC Board joined the Terra REIT Board. Terra LLC does not have a board of directors and Terra REIT is the sole and managing member of Terra LLC. In connection with the Merger, Terra BDC incurred transaction costs totaling $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Prior to the Merger, Terra BDC was an investment company, as defined under U.S. GAAP, and applied accounting and reporting guidance in accordance with the FASB Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946, Financial Services — Investment Companies (the “Predecessor Basis”). Terra LLC does not meet the requirements to be classified as an investment company, and as such, it is an operating company and reports its investments at historical cost (the “Successor Basis”).
Terra BDC was incorporated under the general corporation laws of the State of Maryland on May 15, 2013 and commenced operations on June 24, 2015. Terra BDC was an externally managed, non-diversified, closed-end management investment company that elected to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act. Terra BDC elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code commencing with its short taxable year beginning October 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2018 and believed it operated so as to qualify to be taxed as a REIT under Subchapter M of the Code during the REIT Period.
Our investment activities were externally managed by Terra Income Advisors and supervised by the Terra BDC Board, a majority of whom were independent. Under an Investment Advisory Agreement, we had agreed to pay Terra Income Advisors an annual base management fee based on our average quarterly gross assets, as well as incentive fees based on our performance. In connection with the Merger, the Investment Advisory Agreement was terminated and we no longer pay any fees to Terra Income Advisors. We were also responsible for future payments of the servicing fee to selected dealers under the Servicing Plan as a result of the assignment of certain administrative functions and other obligations under the Dealer Manager Agreement between us and Terra Capital Markets and related selected dealer agreements to us. In connection with the Merger, the Servicing Plan was terminated. See “ — Investment Advisory Agreement and Servicing Plan below.
On April 1, 2021, Mavik, an entity controlled by Vikram S. Uppal, Terra REIT’s Chief Executive Officer, completed a series of related transactions that resulted in all of the outstanding interests in Terra Capital Partners being acquired by Mavik
22



for a combination of cash and interests in Mavik (the “Recapitalization”). Following the series of transactions described below, Terra Income Advisors is ultimately controlled by Mavik.
Prior to the Recapitalization, Terra Capital Partners was the immediate parent and managing member of Terra Income Advisors, and was ultimately controlled by the Axar RE Manager. In connection with the Recapitalization, Axar RE Manager assumed direct control of Terra Income Advisors by becoming its manager. Thus, the same parties that controlled Terra Income Advisors prior to the consummation of the Recapitalization maintained control of Terra Income Advisors, and by the terms of the Recapitalization continued to do so until a new investment advisory and administrative services agreement between Terra BDC and Terra Income Advisors was approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at Terra BDC’s 2021 annual meeting of stockholders on September 22, 2021. Subsequent to the approval of the Investment Advisory Agreement, Axar RE Manager ceased to be the manager of Terra Income Advisors and Terra Capital Partners again became the managing member of Terra Income Advisors.
Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, on October 1, 2022, except for any shares of Terra BDC Common Stock held by Terra REIT or any wholly owned subsidiary of Terra REIT or Terra BDC, which shares were automatically retired and ceased to exist with no consideration paid therefor, each issued and outstanding share of Terra BDC Common Stock was automatically cancelled and retired and converted into the right to receive (i) 0.595 shares of Terra REIT Class B Common Stock and (ii) cash, without interest, in lieu of any fractional shares of Class B Common Stock otherwise issuable in an amount, rounded to the nearest whole cent, determined by multiplying (x) the fraction of a share of Class B Common Stock to which such holder would otherwise be entitled by (y) $14.38.
Pursuant to the terms of the transactions described in the Merger Agreement, 4,847,910 shares of Class B Common Stock were issued to former Terra BDC stockholders in connection with the Merger. Following the consummation of the Merger, former Terra BDC stockholders own approximately 19.9% of the common equity of Terra REIT as the combined company.
In connection with the Merger, Terra LLC assumed the obligations of Terra BDC under the indenture of the unsecured notes payable as well as the credit agreement to provide for a delayed draw term loan of up to $25.0 million. Additionally, the Investment Advisory Agreement between Terra BDC and Terra Income Advisors and the Servicing Plan were terminated on October 1, 2022 and fees pursuant to such agreements are no longer payable. These advisory fees are now payable by our parent and sole managing member, Terra REIT, to its external manager, Terra REIT Advisors, pursuant to the Management Agreement, dated as of February 8, 2018, by and between Terra REIT and Terra REIT Advisors. We have entered into the Cost Sharing Agreement with Terra REIT pursuant to which we will be responsible for our allocable share of Terra REIT’s expenses, including fees paid by Terra REIT to its manager. Terra REIT’s investment objective is to provide attractive risk-adjusted returns to its stockholders, primarily through regular distributions. There can be no assurances that Terra REIT will be successful in meeting its investment objective.
Revenues
We generate revenue primarily in the form of interest on the debt securities that we hold. We make debt investments that bear interest at fixed and floating rates. Interest on debt securities is generally payable monthly. The principal amount of the debt securities and any accrued but unpaid interest generally become due at the maturity date. In addition, we may generate revenue in the form of exit fees payable upon repayment of the loans we hold, origination fees for loans we originate, commitment and other fees in connection with transactions, all of which are recorded as interest income. As prepayment(s), partial or full, occurs on an investment, prepayment income is recognized. Preferred returns earned on any preferred equity investments, if any, is recognized on an accrual basis to the extent that we expect to collect such amounts.
Expenses
Our primary operating expenses included interest expense on unsecured notes payable and the Term Loan (as defined herein), professional fees, payment of fees and reimbursement of expenses to Terra Income Advisors prior to the Merger, payment of fees and reimbursement of expenses to Terra REIT after the Merger pursuant to the Cost Sharing Agreement, and other expenses necessary for our operations.
On October 1, 2022, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, we became a wholly owned subsidiary of Terra REIT. We do not have a board of directors and Terra REIT is our sole and managing member. Subsequent to the Merger, we became the successor of Terra BDC and assumed all of Terra BDC’s rights and obligations. We have entered into the Cost Sharing Agreement with Terra REIT pursuant to which we will be responsible for our allocable share of Terra REIT’s expenses, including fees paid by Terra REIT to its manager.
23



Net Loan Investment Portfolio
    The tables below present our investment portfolio on a net investment basis, which represents our proportionate share of the investments, based on our economic ownership of these investments. This measure is used in reports to Terra REIT’s executive management and is used as a component to the asset base from which we calculate costs due to Terra REIT pursuant to the Cost Sharing Agreement. We believe that this measure provides useful information to investors because it represents our total assets under management and the financial exposure of each investment individually.
December 31, 2022 (Successor Basis)
Gross Loan InvestmentsTransfers Treated as Obligations Under Participation AgreementsNet Loan Investments
Carrying ValueFair ValueCarrying ValueFair ValueCarrying ValueFair value
American Gilsonite Company$21,705,029 $21,443,528 $— $— $21,705,029 $21,443,528 
370 Lex Part Deux, LLC23,655,377 19,718,327 — — 23,655,377 19,718,327 
Hillsborough Owners LLC21,094,981 20,947,571 — — 21,094,981 20,947,571 
Asano Bankers Hill, LLC17,817,825 17,578,839 — — 17,817,825 17,578,839 
William A. Shopoff & Cindy I. Shopoff16,797,348 16,735,951 — — 16,797,348 16,735,951 
Ann Street JV LLC15,548,446 15,127,126 — — 15,548,446 15,127,126 
Havemeyer TSM LLC3,315,030 3,315,293 — — 3,315,030 3,315,293 
Dwight Mezz II LLC2,916,369 2,914,042 — — 2,916,369 2,914,042 
RS JZ Driggs, LLC2,499,671 2,499,671 — — 2,499,671 2,499,671 
Allowance for loan losses(3,937,050)— — — (3,937,050)— 
Total loan investments121,413,026 120,280,348 — — 121,413,026 120,280,348 
Equity investment in unconsolidated
   investment
10,013,691 10,013,691 — — 10,013,691 10,013,691 
Total investments$131,426,717 $130,294,039 $— $— $131,426,717 $130,294,039 
December 31, 2021 (Predecessor Basis)
Gross Loan InvestmentsTransfers Treated as Obligations Under Participation AgreementsNet Loan Investments
Amortized CostFair ValueAmortized CostFair ValueAmortized CostFair value
American Gilsonite Company$21,108,623 $21,417,965 $— $— $21,108,623 $21,417,965 
370 Lex Part Deux, LLC21,002,365 20,250,306 — — 21,002,365 20,250,306 
Hillsborough Owners LLC16,026,455 16,279,593 4,807,937 4,883,877 11,218,518 11,395,716 
Post Brothers Holdings, LLC14,897,294 15,100,246 — — 14,897,294 15,100,246 
William A. Shopoff & Cindy I. Shopoff13,121,112 13,347,088 — — 13,121,112 13,347,088 
RS JZ Driggs, LLC7,847,256 7,877,552 — — 7,847,256 7,877,552 
Havemeyer TSM LLC6,810,164 6,874,428 — — 6,810,164 6,874,428 
Ann Street JV LLC5,320,560 5,482,725 — — 5,320,560 5,482,725 
Dwight Mezz II LLC3,000,000 3,000,730 — — 3,000,000 3,000,730 
Total loan investments109,133,829 109,630,633 4,807,937 4,883,877 104,325,892 104,746,756 
Marketable securities789,335 879,272 — — 789,335 879,272 
Total investments$109,923,164 $110,509,905 $4,807,937 $4,883,877 $105,115,227 $105,626,028 
24



Three Months Ended
December 31, 2022
Nine Months September 30, 2022Year ended December 31, 2021
Successor BasisPredecessor Basis
Weighted Average Principal AmountWeighted Average Coupon RateWeighted Average Principal AmountWeighted Average Coupon RateWeighted Average Principal AmountWeighted Average Coupon Rate
Gross loan
   investments
$119,449,179 13.4%$124,239,298 13.4%$80,550,941 12.8%
Obligations under
   participation
   agreements
— —%(5,567,579)11.1%(3,521,859)11.9%
Net loan investments$119,449,179 13.4%$118,671,719 13.5%$77,029,082 12.9%
Our portfolio is concentrated in a limited number of industries and borrowers, and, as a result, a downturn in any particular industry or borrower in which we are heavily invested may significantly impact the aggregate returns we realize. If an industry in which we are heavily invested suffers from adverse business or economic conditions, a material portion of our investment could be affected adversely, which, in turn, could adversely affect our financial position and results of operations. For example, as of December 31, 2022, our investments secured by mixed-use and office properties represented approximately 34.8% and 19.5% respectively, of the carrying value of our total loan investments. In addition, as of December 31, 2022, we held only nine loan investments and our largest loan investment represented approximately 19.5% of the carrying value of our total loan investments and our largest three loan investments represented approximately 54.8% of the carrying value of our total loan investments.
Portfolio Investment Activity
For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, we invested $65.8 million and $143.9 million in new and add-on investments, and had $42.9 million and $103.3 million of repayments, resulting in net investments of $22.8 million and $40.5 million, respectively.
Our portfolio composition was as follows:
December 31, 2022 (Successor Basis)December 31, 2021 (Predecessor Basis)
  Carrying Value of InvestmentsPercentage of
Total Portfolio
Weighted Average
Coupon Rate (1)
Fair Value of InvestmentsPercentage of
Total Portfolio
Weighted Average
Coupon Rate
(1)
Loans$79,082,650 60.2 %14.6 %$61,281,259 55.4 %12.6 %
Loans through participation
   interest
46,267,426 35.2 %13.6 %48,349,374 43.8 %12.7 %
Equity investment in
   unconsolidated investment
10,013,691 7.6 %— %— — %— %
Marketable securities— — %— %879,272 0.8 %8.5 %
Allowance for loan losses(3,937,050)(3.0)%— %— — %— %
Total$131,426,717 100.0 %114.2 %$110,509,905 100.0 %12.6 %
_______________
(1)Based upon the principal value of our investments.
25



The following table shows the portfolio composition by property type grouping:
December 31, 2022 (Successor Basis)December 31, 2021 (Predecessor Basis)
  Carrying Value of InvestmentsPercentage of
Total Portfolio
Fair Value of InvestmentsPercentage of
Total Portfolio
Mixed use$42,227,836 32.2 %$23,154,021 21.0 %
Office23,655,377 18.0 %20,250,306 18.3 %
Infrastructure21,705,029 16.5 %21,417,965 19.4 %
Multifamily18,048,117 13.7 %28,460,523 25.7 %
Industrial16,797,348 12.8 %13,347,088 12.1 %
Student housing2,916,369 2.2 %3,000,730 2.7 %
Allowance for loan losses(3,937,050)(3.0)%— — %
Total loan investments121,413,026 92.4 %109,630,633 99.2 %
Equity investment in unconsolidated
   investment
10,013,691 7.6 %— — %
Marketable securities— — %879,272 0.8 %
Total investments$131,426,717 100.0 %$110,509,905 100.0 %
Senior Unsecured Notes
In February 2021, Terra BDC issued $38.4 million in aggregate principal amount of 7.00% fixed-rate notes due 2026, for net proceeds of $37.2 million after deducting underwriting commissions of $1.2 million. Interest on the notes is paid quarterly in arrears every March 30, June 30, September 30 and December 30, at a rate of 7.00% per year, beginning June 30, 2021. The notes mature on March 31, 2026. The notes may be redeemed in whole or in part at any time or from time to time at our option on or after February 10, 2023. On October 1, 2022 in connection with the Merger, Terra BDC, Terra LLC and U.S. Bank National Association entered into a second supplemental indenture pursuant to which Terra LLC assumed the payment of the notes and the performance of every covenant of the indenture, to be performed or observed by Terra BDC.
Term Loan
In April 2021, we entered into a credit agreement with a lender to provide for a delayed draw term loan of $25.0 million (the “Term Loan”). The Term Loan currently bears interest at a rate equal to 5.625% and was scheduled to mature on April 9, 2025. On September 27, 2022, the credit agreement was amended to change the scheduled maturity date to July 1, 2023 and remove the make whole premium on voluntary prepayment of the loans as well as to provide consent to the consummation of the Merger and the assumption by Terra LLC of all of the obligations of Terra BDC under the credit agreement. As of December 31, 2022, the amount outstanding under the Term Loan was $25.0 million.
Obligations under Participation Agreements
    We may enter into participation agreements with related and unrelated parties, primarily other affiliated funds of our sponsor. The participation agreements provide us with the opportunity to invest along the same terms, conditions, price, and rights in the specified investment. The purpose of the participation agreements is to allow us and an affiliate to originate a specified investment when, individually, we do not have the liquidity to do so or to achieve a certain level of portfolio diversification. We may transfer portions of our investments to other participants or we may be a participant to an investment held by another entity.
    Certain partial loan sales do not qualify for sale accounting because these sales do not meet the definition of a “participating interest,” as defined in the guidance, in order for sale treatment to be allowed. Participations or other partial loan sales which do not meet the definition of a participating interest remain as an investment on the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities and the portion transferred is recorded as obligations under participation agreements in the liabilities section of the statements of assets and liabilities.
As of December 31, 2021, obligations under participation agreements at fair value was $4.9 million and the weighted average contractual interest rate on the obligations under participation agreements was 8.3%. For the nine months ended September 30, 2022, we transferred $1.2 million of investments to affiliates through participation agreements and did not make any repayments on obligations under participation agreements. In connection with the Merger on October 1, 2022, Terra REIT contributed to us a $6.1 million loan acquired through participation, at which time the related obligation under participation agreement was extinguished. As of December 31, 2022, there were no obligations under participation agreement outstanding.
26



For the year ended December 31, 2021, we transferred $25.9 million of investments to affiliates through participation agreements and made $25.7 million of repayments on obligations under participation agreements.
Results of Operations
Operating results for the three months ended December 31, 2022 (Successor Basis), nine months ended September 30, 2022 and year ended December 31, 2021 (Predecessor Basis) were as follows:
Three Months Ended
December 31, 2022
Revenues
Interest income$6,600,064 
Dividend and other income5,862 
6,605,926 
Operating expenses
Base management fees paid to Terra REIT395,129 
   Operating expense reimbursement to Terra REIT371,515 
Provision for loan losses3,937,050 
Professional fees324,599 
Insurance expense78,501 
5,106,794 
Operating income1,499,132 
Other income and expenses
Income from equity investment in unconsolidated investment13,691 
Interest expense on unsecured notes payable(944,466)
Interest expense on term loan(359,375)
(1,290,150)
Net income$208,982 


27



Nine Months Ended
 September 30, 2022
Year Ended December 31, 2021
Investment income
Interest income$11,648,944 $12,489,678 
Prepayment fee income485,236 
Dividend and other income62,821696,964 
Total investment income11,711,765 13,671,878 
Operating expenses
Base management fees1,964,8302,182,947 
(Reversal of incentive fees) incentive fees on capital gains (1)
(102,160)291,710 
   Operating expense reimbursement to Adviser (Note 5)
946,9341,222,217 
   (Reversal of) Servicing fees (Note 2, Note 5)
(121,504)501,718 
Interest expense on unsecured notes payable2,299,5382,703,111 
Professional fees1,139,7751,240,762 
Interest expense from obligations under participation agreements (Note 5)
433,6221,513,228 
Interest expense on term loan1,101,797313,638 
Directors’ fees84,378120,622 
Insurance expense190,293242,019 
Transaction costs1,459,762— 
General and administrative expenses76,625177,429 
Total operating expenses9,473,890 10,509,401 
Net investment income before income taxes2,237,875 3,162,477 
Income tax expense605,787534,784 
Net investment income1,632,088 2,627,693 
Net change in unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on investments(3,444,211)943,375 
Net change in unrealized depreciation (appreciation) on obligations under participation agreements42,128 (67,533)
Net realized gain on investments55,783582,710 
Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations$(1,714,212)$4,086,245 
Interest Income
For the three months ended December 31, 2022, nine months ended September 30, 2022 and the year ended December 31, 2021, interest income was $6.6 million, $11.6 million, and $12.5 million, respectively, and primarily consisted of contractual interest income of $3.4 million, $10.9 million and $11.1 million, respectively and amortization of transaction fee income of $0.1 million, $0.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively. Additionally, interest income for the three months ended December 31, 2022 included $3.2 million of amortization of purchase premium recorded in connection with the Merger.
Prepayment Fee Income
Prepayment fee income represents prepayment fees charged to borrowers for the early repayment of loans.
For the three months ended December 31, 2022 and nine months ended September 30, 2022, we did not receive any prepayment fee income. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we received a prepayment fee income of $0.5 million on a loan that a borrower repaid one year before maturity.
Dividend and Other Income
For the three months ended December 31, 2022, nine months ended September 30, 2022 and the year ended December 31, 2021, dividend and other income was $0.01 million, $0.1 million and $0.7 million, respectively. Dividend and other income for the year ended December 31, 2021 was related to dividend income received on marketable securities.
28



Base Management Fees
    Under the Investment Advisory Agreement, Terra BDC paid Terra Income Advisors a base management fee, which was calculated at an annual rate of 2.0% of our average gross assets. In connection with the Merger, the Investment Advisory Agreement was terminated and we entered into the Cost Sharing Agreement with Terra REIT.
    For the three months ended December 31, 2022, we paid base management fees of $0.4 million to Terra REIT pursuant to the Cost Sharing Agreement. For the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and the year ended December 31, 2021, we paid base management fees of $2.0 million and $2.2 million, respectively, to Terra Income Advisors pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement.
(Reversal of Incentive Fees) Incentive Fees on Capital Gains
Under the Investment Advisory Agreement, Terra BDC paid Terra Income Advisors an incentive fee on capital gains equaled to 20.0% of our net realized and unrealized capital gains. No incentive fees on capital gains were actually payable by Terra BDC with respect to unrealized gains` until those gains were realized. The Investment Advisory Agreement was terminated in connection with the Merger. 
For the three months ended December 31, 2022 there were no reversals of incentive fees or incentive fees on capital gains because the Investment Advisory Agreement was terminated on October 1, 2022. For the nine months ended September 30, 2022, we reversed previously recorded incentive fees on capital gains of $0.1 million, as a result of a decline in the value of our investments. For the year ended December 31, 2021, incentive fees on capital gains were $0.3 million, as a result of an increase in the value of our investments.
Operating Expense Reimbursement
    Under the Investment Advisory Agreement, Terra BDC reimbursed Terra Income Advisors for operating expenses incurred in connection with administrative services provided to us, including compensation to administrative personnel. In connection with the Merger, the Investment Advisory Agreement was terminated and we entered into the Cost Sharing Agreement with Terra REIT.
    For the three months ended December 31, 2022, we reimbursed Terra REIT $0.4 million for operating expense incurred on our behalf pursuant to the Cost Sharing Agreement. For the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and the year ended December 31, 2021, we reimbursed Terra Income Advisors $0.9 million and $1.2 million, respectively, for operating expenses incurred on our behalf, pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement.
(Reversal of) Servicing Fees
Terra BDC maintained a servicing plan whereby it paid selected dealers a servicing fee at an annual rate of 0.75% of the most recently published NAV per share of its common stock, in exchange for providing stockholder-related administrative support services. With respect to each share sold, excluding shares sold through the distribution reinvestment plan, the servicing fee was payable annually on the anniversary of the applicable month of purchase. In connection with the Merger, the servicing plan was terminated.
For the three months ended December 31, 2022 there were no servicing fees. For the nine months ended September 30, 2022, Terra BDC reversed previously accrued servicing fees of $0.1 million, as a result of terminating the servicing plan in connection with the Merger. For the year ended December 31, 2021, serving fees were $0.5 million.
Provision for Loan Losses
The REIT Manager performs a quarterly evaluation for possible impairment of our portfolio of loans. We record an allowance for loan losses equal to (i) 1.5% of the aggregate carrying amount of loans rated as a “4”, plus (ii) 5% of the aggregate carrying amount of loans rated as a “5”, plus (iii) impaired loan reserves, if any.
As of December 31, 2022, we had two loans deemed impaired and recorded specific allowance for loan losses of $3.9 million for the three months ended December 31, 2022. We did not record any general allowance for loan losses because we did not have any loans with risk ratings of “4” or “5”. There was no provision for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and the year ended December 31, 2021, because the loans were reported at fair value.
29



Interest Expense on Unsecured Notes Payable
In February 2021, Terra BDC issued $38.4 million in aggregate principal amount of 7.00% fixed-rate notes due 2026. On October 1, 2022 in connection with the Merger, Terra BDC, Terra LLC and U.S. Bank National Association entered into a second supplemental indenture pursuant to which Terra LLC assumed the payment of the notes and the performance of every covenant of the indenture, to be performed or observed by Terra BDC.
For the three months ended December 31, 2022, nine months ended September 30, 2022 and the year ended December 31, 2021, interest expense on unsecured notes payable was $0.9 million, $2.3 million and $2.7 million, respectively.
Professional Fees
For the three months ended December 31, 2022, nine months ended September 30, 2022 and the year ended December 31, 2021, professional fees were $0.3 million, $1.1 million and $1.2 million, respectively. Professional fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 included a termination fee incurred in connection with terminating the contract with the transfer agent as a result of the Merger.
Interest Expense on Term Loan
In April 2021, Terra BDC entered into a credit agreement with a lender to provide for a delayed draw term loan of $25.0 million. The Term Loan currently bears interest at a rate equal to 5.625% and was scheduled to mature on April 9, 2025. We also pay, with respect to any unused portion of the Term Loan, a commitment fee of 0.75% per annum. On September 27, 2022, the credit agreement was amended to change the scheduled maturity date to July 1, 2023 and remove the make whole premium on voluntary prepayment of the loans as well as to provide consent to the consummation of the Merger and the assumption by Terra LLC of all of the obligations of Terra BDC under the credit agreement effective October 1, 2022. As of December 31, 2022, the amount outstanding under the Term Loan was $25.0 million.
For the three months ended December 31, 2022, nine months ended September 30, 2022 and the year ended December 31, 2021, interest expense on the Term Loan was $0.4 million, $1.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
Interest Expense From Obligations Under Participation Agreements
For the three months ended December 31, 2022, there was no interest expense from obligations under participation agreements as the related obligation under participation agreements was extinguished in connection with the Merger. For the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and year ended December 31, 2021, interest expense from obligations under participation agreements were $0.4 million and $1.5 million, respectively.
Directors’ Fees
For the three months ended December 31, 2022, there were no directors fees as Terra REIT is responsible for paying directors fees subsequent to the Merger. For the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and year ended December 31, 2021, directors fees were $0.08 million and $0.12 million, respectively.
Transaction Costs
On October 1, 2022, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Terra BDC merged with and into Terra LLC with Terra LLC surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Terra REIT. In connection with the Merger, we incurred transaction costs totaling $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022. There were no such costs for the three months ended December 31, 2022 or the year ended December 31, 2021.
Income Tax Expense
During the third quarter of 2021, Terra BDC formed a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) to hold two credit facilities. Subsequent to the Merger on October 1, 2022, the TRS became a qualified REIT subsidiary of Terra LLC.
For the three months ended December 31, 2022, there was no provision for income tax as a TRS is not utilized subsequent to the Merger. For the nine months ended September 30, 2022, pre-tax income attributable to the TRS was $2.1 million. Based on the effective income tax rate of 28.2%, the provision for income tax for the TRS was $0.6 million. For the year ended December 31, 2021, pre-tax income attributable to the TRS was $1.8 million. Based on the effective income tax rate of 30.5%, provision for income tax for the TRS was $0.5 million.
30



Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation on Investments and Obligations under Participation Agreements
    Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments and obligations under participation agreements reflects the change in our portfolio investment values during the reporting period, including any reversal of previously recorded unrealized gains or losses, when gains or losses are realized. Valuation of our portfolio investments and obligations under participation agreements fluctuates over time, reflecting changes in the market yields for loans and debt investments, and any associated premium or discount and origination or exit fee are amortized down or accreted up to par value as each investment approaches maturity.
For the three months ended December 31, 2022, we did not record any unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments because investments were reported at cost subsequent to the Merger (Successor Basis).
For the nine months ended September 30, 2022, we recorded an increase in unrealized depreciation on investments of $3.4 million, as a result of a decrease in the collateral of a loan as well as an increase in the index rates.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded an increase in net change in unrealized appreciation on investments of $0.9 million, primarily due to new investments originated in the current period partially offset by a decrease in the discounted cash flow of one loan due to the recovery period being extended.
Net Realized Gain on Investments
For the three months ended December 31, 2022, we did not sell any marketable securities and did not recognize any gain or loss on investments.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2022, we sold marketable securities and recognized a net gain on investments of $0.1 million.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, net realized gain on investments was $0.6 million, primarily related to net gain recognized on sale of marketable securities of $0.8 million, partially offset by a loss recognized on the repayment of a loan of $0.2 million.
Net Income
For the three months ended December 31, 2022, the resulting net income as $0.2 million.

Net (Decrease) Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations

For the nine months ended September 30, 2022, we recorded a net decrease in net assets resulting from operations of $1.7 million. Based on the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding, our per share net decrease in net assets resulting from operations was $0.21.

For the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded a net increase in net assets resulting from operations of $4.1 million. Based on the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding, our per share net increase in net assets resulting from operations was $0.49.

Terra REIT’s Management Agreement with Terra REIT Advisors

Terra REIT is our parent and sole managing member. We have entered into a cost sharing arrangement with Terra REIT pursuant to which we will be responsible for our allocable share of Terra REIT’s expenses, including fees paid by Terra REIT to its manager, Terra REIT Advisors. Terra REIT currently pays the following fees to Terra REIT Advisors pursuant to the Management Agreement:

Origination and Extension Fee. An origination fee in the amount of 1.0% of the amount used to originate, acquire, fund or structure real estate-related investments, including any third-party expenses related to such loan. In the event that the term of any real estate-related loan is extended, Terra REIT Advisors also receives an origination fee equal to the lesser of (i) 1.0% of the principal amount of the loan being extended or (ii) the amount of fee paid by the borrower in connection with such extension.

Asset Management Fee. A monthly asset management fee at an annual rate equal to 1.0% of the aggregate funds under management, which includes the loan origination amount or aggregate gross acquisition cost, as applicable, for each real estate-related loan and cash held by Terra REIT.
31



Asset Servicing Fee. A monthly asset servicing fee at an annual rate equal to 0.25% of the aggregate gross origination price or aggregate gross acquisition price for each real estate related loan then held by Terra REIT (inclusive of closing costs and expenses).

Disposition Fee. A disposition fee in the amount of 1.0% of the gross sale price received by Terra REIT from the disposition of each loan, but not upon the maturity, prepayment, workout, modification or extension of a loan unless there is a corresponding fee paid by the borrower, in which case the disposition fee will be the lesser of (i) 1.0% of the principal amount of the loan and ii) the amount of the fee paid by the borrower in connection with such transaction. If Terra REIT takes ownership of a property as a result of a workout or foreclosure of a loan, Terra REIT will pay a disposition fee upon the sale of such property equal to 1.0% of the sales price.

Transaction Breakup Fee. In the event that Terra REIT receive any “breakup fees,” “busted-deal fees,” termination fees, or similar fees or liquidated damages from a third-party in connection with the termination or non-consummation of any loan or disposition transaction, Terra REIT Advisors will be entitled to receive one-half of such amounts, in addition to the reimbursement of all out-of-pocket fees and expenses incurred by Terra REIT Advisors with respect to its evaluation and pursuit of such transactions.

In addition to the fees described above, Terra REIT reimburses Terra REIT Advisors for operating expenses incurred in connection with services provided to the operations of Terra REIT, including its allocable share of Terra REIT Advisors’ overhead, such as rent, employee costs, utilities, and technology costs.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
    We currently generate cash primarily from cash flows from interest, dividends and fees earned from our investments and principal repayments and proceeds from sales of our investments. Our primary use of cash is for our targeted investments and payments of our expenses.
    Prior to investing in securities of portfolio companies, we invest the net proceeds from the offering of securities and from sales and paydowns of existing investments primarily in cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities, repurchase agreements and high-quality debt instruments maturing in one year or less from the time of investment.
    We may borrow funds to make investments to the extent we determine that leveraging our portfolio would be appropriate. In February 2021, Terra BDC issued $38.4 million in aggregate principal amount of 7.00% fixed-rate notes due 2026, for net proceeds of $37.2 million after deducting underwriting commissions of $1.2 million. On October 1, 2022 in connection with the Merger, Terra BDC, Terra LLC and U.S. Bank National Association entered into a second supplemental indenture pursuant to which Terra LLC assumed the payment of the notes and the performance of every covenant of the indenture, to be performed or observed by Terra BDC. In April 2021, Terra BDC entered into a credit agreement with a lender to provide for a delayed draw term loan of $25.0 million. The term loan currently bears interest at a rate equal to 5.625% and was scheduled to mature on April 9, 2025. On September 27, 2022, the credit agreement was amended to change the scheduled maturity date to July 1, 2023 and remove the make whole premium on voluntary prepayment of the loans as well as to provide consent to the consummation of the Merger and the assumption by Terra LLC of all of the obligations of Terra BDC under the credit agreement. As of December 31, 2022, amount outstanding under the Term Loan was $25.0 million.
Certain of our loans provide for commitments to fund the borrower at a future date. As of December 31, 2022, we had three loans with total funding commitments of $59.3 million, of which we funded $53.4 million. We expect to fund $5.9 million of the unfunded commitments to borrowers during the next twelve months.
Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2022 (Successor Basis)
Operating Activities — For the three months ended December 31, 2022, cash used in operating activities was $0.1 million.
Investing Activities For the three months ended December 31, 2022, cash used in investing activities was $17.7 million, related to purchases of investments.
Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022 (Predecessor Basis)
    Operating Activities — For the nine months ended September 30, 2022, net cash used in operating activities was $6.9 million. The level of cash flows used in or provided by operating activities is affected by the timing of purchases, repayments and sales of portfolio investments, among other factors. Cash flows used in operating activities for the nine months ended
32



September 30, 2022 were primarily related to purchases of investments of $48.1 million, partially offset by repayments and proceeds from sale of investments of $42.9 million and cash generated from operations of $1.8 million.
    Financing Activities — For the nine months ended September 30, 2022, net cash provided by financing activities was $19.0 million, primarily related to proceeds from borrowings under the Term Loan of $19.9 million and proceeds from obligations under participation agreements of $1.2 million, partially offset by distributions paid to stockholders of $2.1 million.
Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2021 (Predecessor Basis)
    Operating Activities — For the year ended December 31, 2021, net cash used in operating activities was $35.7 million. The level of cash flows used in or provided by operating activities is affected by the timing of purchases, repayments and sales of portfolio investments, among other factors. Cash flows used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2021 were primarily related to purchases of investments of $143.9 million, partially offset by repayments and proceeds from sale of investments of $103.3 million and cash generated from operations of $4.9 million.
    Financing Activities — For the year ended December 31, 2021, net cash provided by financing activities was $33.8 million, primarily related to proceeds from issuance of unsecured notes, net of discount, of $37.2 million and proceeds from borrowings under the Term Loan of $4.4 million, net of discount, partially offset by distributions paid to stockholders of $2.9 million, payments for repurchases of common stock under the stock repurchase plan of $3.8 million and payment of financing costs related to the issuance of unsecured notes and the Term Loan of $1.3 million. Additionally, we received proceeds from obligations under participation agreements of $25.9 million and made repayment of obligations under participation agreements of $25.7 million.
Investment Advisory Agreement
Terra BDC entered into certain contracts under which it had material future commitments.
On April 20, 2015, Terra BDC entered into the Investment Advisory Agreement with Terra Income Advisors in accordance with the 1940 Act. Terra Income Advisors served as its investment adviser in accordance with the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement. Payments under the Investment Advisory Agreement in each reporting period consist of (i) a base management fee equal to a percentage of the value of our average gross assets and (ii) an incentive fee based on our performance. Terra Income Advisors was reimbursed for allocated administrative expenses incurred on Terra BDC’s behalf. The Investment Advisory Agreement was terminated in connection with the Merger.
    On September 30, 2017, Terra BDC adopted the Servicing Plan. Pursuant to the Servicing Plan, Terra Capital Markets was entitled to receive a servicing fee at an annual rate of 1.125% of the most recently published NAV per share of Terra BDC’s common stock, of which up to 0.75% was reallowed to selected dealers, in exchange for providing certain administrative support services. With respect to each share sold, excluding shares sold through our distribution reinvestment plan, the servicing fee was payable annually on the anniversary of the applicable month of purchase. On December 23, 2020, Terra Capital Markets assigned to Terra BDC certain of its administration support services and certain obligations under the Dealer Manager Agreement, including making future payments of the previously reallowed servicing fee under the Servicing Plan directly to selected dealers, effectively reducing the servicing fee to 0.75%. In connection with the Merger, the Servicing Plan was terminated.
The following table presents a summary of such fees and reimbursements in accordance with the terms of the related agreements:
Three Months Ended
December 31, 2022 (1)
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2022
Year Ended
December 31, 2021
Amounts Included in the Statements of Operations
Base management fees$395,129 $1,964,830 $2,182,947 
(Reversal of incentive fees) incentive fees on capital gains (2)
N/A(102,160)291,710 
Operating expense reimbursement to Adviser (3)
371,515 946,934 1,222,217 
Servicing feeN/A(121,504)501,718 
_______________
(1)These fees were incurred pursuant to the Cost Sharing Agreement between Terra LLC and Terra REIT.
33



(2)For the nine months ended September 30, 2022 Terra BDC reversed previously accrued incentive fees on capital gains of $102,160. Incentive fees on capital gains were based on 20% of net realized and unrealized capital gains. No incentive fees on capital gains are actually payable by Terra BDC with respect to unrealized gains unless and until those gains are realized.
(3)Amounts were primarily compensation for time spent supporting our day-to-day operations.
REIT Status and Distributions
    Terra BDC elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code commencing with its short taxable year beginning October 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2018. Terra BDC believed it operated in such a manner to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes through its short taxable year ended October 1, 2022. In order to qualify as a REIT during the REIT Period, Terra BDC was required, among other things, to distribute dividends equal to at least 90% of its REIT net taxable income to the stockholders annually and meet certain tests regarding the nature of its income and assets. As long as the distributions were declared by the later of the fifteenth day of the ninth month following the close of the taxable year or the due date of the tax return, including extensions, distributions paid up to one year after the current tax year can be carried back to the prior tax year for determining the distributions paid in such tax year. Terra BDC was also subject to nondeductible federal excise taxes if it did not distribute at least 85.0% of its ordinary income, 95.0% of its capital gain net income, if any, and any recognized and undistributed income from prior years on which it paid no federal income taxes. For its taxable years during the REIT Period, including its short taxable year ended October 1, 2022, Terra BDC made sufficient distributions to our stockholders to qualify to be taxed as a REIT and to preclude the imposition of either U.S. federal corporate income or excise taxation during the REIT Period.
    Distributions to Terra BDC stockholders were recorded as of the record date. Subject to the discretion of the Terra BDC Board and applicable legal restrictions, Terra BDC authorized and declared ordinary cash distributions on either a monthly or quarterly basis and pay such distributions on a monthly basis. Terra BDC calculated each stockholder’s specific distribution amount for the period using daily record dates, and each stockholder’s distributions began to accrue on the date Terra BDC accepted such stockholder’s subscription for shares of its common stock.
    During certain periods, Terra BDC’s distributions may have exceeded its earnings. As a result, it was possible that some or all of the distributions it made represented a return of capital for tax purposes. A return of capital generally is a return of an investor’s investment rather than a return of earnings or gains derived from investment activities and would be made after deducting the fees and expenses payable in connection with a public offering of Terra BDC Common Stock, including any fees payable to Terra Income Advisors. Each year a statement on Form 1099-DIV identifying the sources of the distributions was mailed to our stockholders.
    Terra BDC adopted an “opt in” distribution reinvestment plan for its stockholders. As a result, if it made a cash distribution, its stockholders would receive distributions in cash unless they specifically “opt in” to the distribution reinvestment plan so as to have their cash distributions reinvested in additional shares of our common stock. However, certain state authorities or regulators may have imposed restrictions from time to time that have prevented or limited a stockholder’s ability to participate in the distribution reinvestment plan.
    Terra BDC funded its cash distributions to stockholders from any sources of funds available, including, borrowings, net investment income from operations, capital gain proceeds from the sale of assets, non-capital gain proceeds from the sale of assets, dividends or other distributions paid to Terra BDC on account of preferred and common equity investments in portfolio companies. Terra BDC did not establish limits on the amount of funds it used from available sources to make distributions. In connection with the Merger, Terra BDC’s distribution reinvestment plan was terminated.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP, which requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Critical accounting policies are those that require the application of management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often because of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and that may change in subsequent periods. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management has made estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management has utilized available information, including industry standards and the current economic environment, among other factors, in forming its estimates and judgments, giving due consideration to materiality. Actual results may differ from these estimates. In addition, other companies may utilize different estimates, which may impact the comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar
34



businesses. As we execute our expected operating plans, we will describe additional critical accounting policies in the notes to our future consolidated financial statements in addition to those discussed below.
Allowance for Loan Losses
    Our loans are typically collateralized by either the sponsors’ equity interest in the real estate properties or the underlying real estate properties. As a result, we regularly evaluate the extent and impact of any credit migration associated with the performance and/or value of the underlying collateral property as well as the financial and operating capability of the borrower/sponsor on a loan-by-loan basis. Specifically, a property’s operating results and any cash reserves are analyzed and used to assess (i) whether cash from operations and/or reserve balances are sufficient to cover the debt service requirements currently and into the future; (ii) the ability of the borrower to refinance the loan; and/or (iii) the property’s liquidation value. We also evaluate the financial wherewithal of the sponsor as well as its competency in managing and operating the real estate property. In addition, we consider the overall economic environment, real estate sector, and geographic submarket in which the borrower operates. Such analyses are completed and reviewed by asset management and finance personnel, who utilize various data sources, including (i) periodic financial data such as debt service coverage ratio, property occupancy, tenant profile, rental rates, operating expenses, the borrower’s exit plan, the capitalization and discount rates; (ii) site inspections; and (iii) current credit spreads and discussions with market participants.
    The REIT Manager performs a quarterly evaluation for possible impairment of our portfolio of loans. A loan is impaired if it is deemed probable that we will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. Impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Upon measurement of impairment, we record an allowance to reduce the carrying value of the loan with a corresponding charge to net income.
    In conjunction with the quarterly evaluation of loans not considered impaired, the REIT Manager assesses the risk factors of each loan and assigns each loan a risk rating between 1 (very low risk) and 5 (highest risk), which is an average of the numerical ratings in the following categories: (i) sponsor capability and financial conditions; (ii) loan and collateral performance relative to underwriting; (iii) quality and stability of collateral cash flows and/or reserve balances; and (iv) loan to value. We record an allowance for loan losses equal to (i) 1.5% of the aggregate carrying amount of loans rated as a “4,” (Higher risk), plus (ii) 5% of the aggregate carrying amount of loans rated as a “5,” (Highest risk) plus (iii) impaired loan reserves, if any.
    There may be circumstances where we modify a loan by granting the borrower a concession that we might not otherwise consider when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty or is expected to experience financial difficulty in the foreseeable future. Such concessionary modifications are classified as troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”), unless the modification solely results in a delay in a payment that is insignificant. Loans classified as TDRs are considered impaired loans for reporting and measurement purposes.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
We may be subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. To the extent that we borrow money to make investments, our net investment income will be dependent upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the rate at which we invest these funds. In periods of rising interest rates, our cost of funds would increase, which may reduce our net investment income. As a result, there can be no assurance that a significant change in the market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our net investment income.
As of December 31, 2022, we had two investments with a net principal balance of $44.4 million that provide for interest income indexed to the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and is subject to a LIBOR floor. A decrease of 1% in LIBOR would decrease our annual interest income by $0.4 million and an increase of 1% in LIBOR would increase our annual interest income by $0.4 million. Additionally, as of December 31, 2022, we had one investment with a net principal balance of $17.5 million that provides for interest income indexed to the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) and is subject to a SOFR floor. A decrease of 1% in SOFR would decrease our annual interest income by $0.2 million and an increase of 1% in SOFR would increase our annual interest income by $0.2 million.
We may hedge against interest rate and currency exchange rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments, such as futures, options and forward contracts. While hedging activities may insulate us against adverse changes in interest rates, they may also limit our ability to participate in benefits of lower interest rates with respect to our portfolio of investments with fixed interest rates. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, we did not engage in interest rate hedging activities.
35



Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Our financial statements are annexed to this Annual Report on Form 10-K beginning on page F-1.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
    None.
Item 9A4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
    As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2022. Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that we would meet our disclosure obligations.
Evaluation of Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets, (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of Terra REIT Advisors, and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements in our financial statements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of our sole managing member Terra REIT (performing functions equivalent to those a principal executive officer and principal financial officer of our company would perform if we had any officers), we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). Based on its evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The rules of the SEC do not require, and this Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include, an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the most recent fiscal quarter, there was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting, as defined under Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
None
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
Not applicable.
36



PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
    This section has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(c) of Form 10-K.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
This section has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(c) of Form 10-K.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
This section has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(c) of Form 10-K.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
This section has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(c) of Form 10-K.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

On October 1, 2022, pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, Terra BDC merged with and into us, with us continuing as the surviving entity of the Merger and as a wholly owned subsidiary of Terra REIT. We do not have a board of directors and Terra REIT is our sole and managing member. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) served as our independent auditor and provided certain tax and other services. The Audit Committee of Terra REIT Advisors (the “Terra REIT Audit Committee”) currently anticipates that it will engage KPMG as our independent auditor to audit our consolidated financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2023, subject to agreeing on fee estimates for the audit work. The Terra REIT Audit Committee reserves the right, however, to select a new auditor at any time in the future in its discretion. Any such decision would be disclosed to the stockholders in accordance with applicable securities laws, except that the applicable policies for the periods prior to the closing of the Merger on October 1, 2022 were the policies of Terra BDC which were substantially similar to the policies of Terra REIT and were administered by the audit committee of the Terra BDC Board during such periods.
Audit Fees
The following table displays fees for professional services by KPMG:
Years Ended December 31,
20222021
Audit Fees$378,600 $348,240 
Audit-Related Fees— — 
Tax Fees44,227 55,000 
All Other Fees— — 
Total$422,827 $403,240 
Audit Fees.  Audit fees include fees for services that normally would be provided by KPMG in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements and that generally only an independent accountant can provide. In addition to fees for the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of our quarterly financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, this category contains fees for comfort letters, statutory audits, consents, and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC.
Audit-Related Fees.  Audit-related services consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services include attest services that are not required by statute or regulation and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.
Tax Services Fees.  Tax services fees consist of fees billed for professional tax services. These services also include assistance regarding federal, state, and local tax compliance.
All Other Fees.  Other fees would include fees for products and services other than the services reported above.
37



Pre-Approval Policies
Terra REIT has established a pre-approval policy that describes the permitted audit, audit-related, tax and other services to be provided by our independent auditor. Pursuant to this policy, the Terra REIT Audit Committee will pre-approve the audit and non-audit services performed by our independent auditor in order to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the auditor’s independence. Any requests for audit, audit-related, tax and other services that have not received general pre-approval must be submitted to the Terra REIT Audit Committee for specific pre-approval in accordance with the pre-approval policy, irrespective of the amount of fees associated with such services, and cannot commence until such approval has been granted. Normally, pre-approval is provided at the regularly scheduled meetings of the Terra REIT Audit Committee. However, the Terra REIT Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. The member or members to whom such authority is delegated must report any pre-approval decisions to the Terra REIT Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Terra REIT Audit Committee does not delegate its responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by our independent auditor to management. All services rendered by KPMG for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were pre-approved in accordance with the policies set forth above.
PART IV
Item 15.  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
(1) Financial Statements
The index to our financial statements is on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(2) Financial Statement Schedule
The index to our financial schedules is on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(3) Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed with this report. Documents other than those designated as being filed herewith are incorporated herein by reference.
Exhibit No. Description and Method of Filing
2.1
3.1 
3.2
3.3
3.4
38



Exhibit No.Description and Method of Filing
3.5
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
10.1
10.2
10.3
31.1* 
31.2* 
32.1*  
101.INS**Inline XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document
101.SCH**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104Cover Page Interactive Data File Included as Exhibit 101 (embedded within the Inline XBRL document)
* Filed herewith.
** Furnished herewith.
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.
    None.
39


Terra Income Fund 6, LLC
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Page
KPMG LLPNew York, NYPCAOB ID:185
Financial Statements:

Schedules other than those listed are omitted as they are not applicable for the required or equivalent information has been included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

F-1


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Member
Terra Income Fund 6, LLC:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the consolidated financial statements and the related notes and financial statement schedule IV (collectively, the consolidated financial statements) of Terra Income Fund 6, LLC and subsidiaries, successor to Terra Income Fund 6, Inc. and subsidiaries, (collectively, the Company) as listed in the accompanying index. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2022 (Successor Basis) and 2021 (Predecessor Basis), and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the three-month period ended December 31, 2022 (Successor Basis), the nine-month period ended September 30, 2022 (Predecessor Basis), and the year ended December 31, 2021 (Predecessor Basis), in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Assessment of the allowance for loan losses

As discussed in Notes 2 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company's allowance for loan losses on loans held for investment and loans held for investment acquired through participation (loans) collectively evaluated for impairment (ALL) totaled $0 as of December 31, 2022. The Company performs a quarterly evaluation for possible impairment of the loan portfolio. For loans not considered impaired, the Company assesses the risk factors of each loan and assigns a risk rating. Risk factors include the (i) sponsor capability and financial condition, (ii) loan and collateral performance relative to underwriting, (iii) quality and stability of collateral cash flows and /or reserve balances, and (iv) loan to value. The Company records an allowance for loan losses based on a loss rate percentage for specific risk ratings and the aggregate carrying amount of the loan.

We identified the assessment of the ALL as a critical audit matter. A high degree of audit effort, including specialized skills and knowledge, and subjective and complex auditor judgment was involved in the assessment due to significant recognition and
F-2


measurement uncertainty. Specifically, complex and subjective auditor judgment was required to assess the methodology and data used to derive the loss rate percentage and risk ratings assigned. In addition, subjective auditor judgment was required to evaluate the sufficiency of audit evidence obtained.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the Company’s recognition and measurement of the ALL estimate by testing the relevance of certain sources of internal and external data. We evaluated the risk ratings for a selection of loans by reviewing borrower level credit information, property cash flows, collateral value and credit policies of the Company.

We involved credit risk professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in evaluating:
the Company’s ALL methodology for compliance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
the risk factors by comparing them to Company information, which included internal policies and procedures, and external metrics.
the Company’s risk rating approach and the risk rating assignment for certain factors of certain loans by reviewing borrower level credit information, property cash flows, collateral value and credit policies of the Company.

We also assessed the sufficiency of the audit evidence obtained related to ALL by evaluating the:
cumulative results of the audit procedures.
qualitative aspects of the Company’s accounting practices.
potential bias in the accounting estimate.


/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2016.
New York, New York
March 10, 2023





F-3


Terra Income Fund 6, LLC
(Successor of Terra Income Fund 6, Inc.)
Consolidated Balance Sheet (Successor Basis)
December 31, 2022
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents$6,524,596 
Restricted cash215,357 
Loans held for investment, net79,082,650 
Loans held for investment acquired through participation, net42,330,376 
Equity investment in unconsolidated investment10,013,691 
Interest receivable1,441,044 
Prepaid expenses and other assets177,240 
Total assets$139,784,954 
Liabilities and Equity
Liabilities:
Unsecured notes payable, net of purchase discount34,042,904 
Term loan payable25,000,000 
Interest reserve and other deposits held on investments215,357 
Accrued expenses582,816 
Other liabilities252,045 
Total liabilities60,093,122 
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 7)
Equity:
Managing member79,691,832 
Total equity79,691,832 
Total liabilities and equity$139,784,954 


See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4


Terra Income Fund 6, LLC
(Successor of Terra Income Fund 6, Inc.)
Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities (Predecessor Basis)
December 31, 2021
Assets
Investments, at fair value — non-controlled (amortized cost of $60,352,932)
$61,281,259 
Investment through participation interest, at fair value — non-controlled (amortized cost of
   $48,780,897) (Note 5)
48,349,374 
Marketable securities, at fair value — non-controlled (cost of $789,335)
879,272 
Total investments110,509,905 
Cash and cash equivalents12,232,256 
Restricted cash224,618 
Interest receivable1,450,451 
Prepaid expenses and other assets314,945 
Total assets124,732,175 
Liabilities
Unsecured notes payable (net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $1,877,388)
36,497,612 
Term loan payable (net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $829,836)
4,170,164 
Obligations under participation agreements, at fair value (proceeds of $4,863,009) (Note 5)
4,883,877 
Interest reserve and other deposits held on investments224,618 
Due to related party3,108,922 
Due to Adviser, net843,040 
Accrued expenses651,637 
Other liabilities765,661 
Total liabilities51,145,531 
Net assets$73,586,644 
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 7)
Components of net assets:
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 450,000,000 shares authorized, and 8,078,627 shares issued and
   outstanding
$8,079 
Capital in excess of par72,902,542 
Accumulated net income676,023 
Net assets$73,586,644 
Net asset value per share$9.11 


See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5


Terra Income Fund 6, LLC
(Successor of Terra Income Fund 6, Inc.)
Consolidated Statement of Operations (Successor Basis)

Three Months Ended December 31, 2022
Revenues
Interest income$6,600,064 
Dividend and other income5,862 
6,605,926 
Operating expenses
Base management fees paid to Terra REIT (1)
395,129 
  Operating expense reimbursement to Terra REIT (1)
371,515 
Provision for loan losses3,937,050 
Professional fees324,599 
Insurance expense78,501 
5,106,794 
Operating income1,499,132 
Other income and expenses
Income from equity investment in unconsolidated investment13,691 
Interest expense on unsecured notes payable(944,466)
Interest expense on term loan(359,375)
(1,290,150)
Net income$208,982 
______________
(1)The fees were paid and expenses were reimbursed to Terra REIT pursuant to the Cost Sharing Agreement with Terra REIT (Note 5).

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-6


Terra Income Fund 6, LLC
(Successor of Terra Income Fund 6, Inc.)
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Predecessor Basis)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022Year Ended December 31, 2021
Investment income
Interest income$11,648,944 $12,489,678 
Prepayment fee income485,236 
Dividend and other income62,821696,964 
Total investment income11,711,765 13,671,878 
Operating expenses
Base management fees1,964,8302,182,947 
(Reversal of incentive fees) incentive fees on capital gains(102,160)291,710 
  Operating expense reimbursement to Adviser (Note 5)
946,9341,222,217 
  (Reversal of) Servicing fees (Note 2, Note 5)
(121,504)501,718 
Interest expense on unsecured notes payable2,299,5382,703,111 
Professional fees1,139,7751,240,762 
Interest expense from obligations under participation agreements (Note 5)
433,6221,513,228 
Interest expense on term loan1,101,797313,638 
Directors’ fees84,378120,622 
Insurance expense190,293242,019 
Transaction costs1,459,762— 
General and administrative expenses76,625177,429 
Total operating expenses9,473,890 10,509,401 
Net investment income before income taxes2,237,875 3,162,477 
Income tax expense605,787534,784 
Net investment income1,632,088 2,627,693 
Net change in unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on investments(3,444,211)943,375 
Net change in unrealized depreciation (appreciation) on obligations under participation agreements42,128 (67,533)
Net realized gain on investments55,783582,710 
Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations$(1,714,212)$4,086,245 
Per common share data:
Net investment income per share$0.20 $0.31 
Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations per share$(0.21)$0.49 
Weighted average common shares outstanding8,110,3518,389,604 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-7


Terra Income Fund 6, LLC
(Successor of Terra Income Fund 6, Inc.)
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Member’s Capital (Successor Basis)

Managing
Member
Total
Balance, October 1, 2022$69,754,081 $69,754,081 
Contribution6,131,528 6,131,528 
Purchase price adjustment in connection with the Merger (Note 5)
3,597,241 3,597,241 
Net income208,982 208,982 
Balance, December 31, 2022$79,691,832 $79,691,832 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-8


Terra Income Fund 6, LLC
(Successor of Terra Income Fund 6, Inc.)
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets (Predecessor Basis)
Nine Months ended September 30, 2022Year Ended December 31, 2021
Operations
Net investment income$1,632,088 $2,627,693 
Net change in unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on investments(3,444,211)943,375 
Net change in unrealized depreciation (appreciation) on obligations under
   participation agreements
42,128 (67,533)
Net realized gain on investments55,783 582,710 
Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations(1,714,212)4,086,245 
Stockholder distributions
Distributions from return of capital(789,506)(603,964)
Distributions from net investment income(1,970,476)(3,211,539)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from stockholder distributions(2,759,982)(3,815,503)
Capital share transactions
Reinvestment of stockholder distributions641,631 922,624 
Repurchases of common stock— (3,782,455)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from capital share transactions641,631 (2,859,831)
Net decrease in net assets(3,832,563)(2,589,089)
Net assets, at beginning of period73,586,644 76,175,733 
Net assets, at end of period$69,754,081 $73,586,644 
Capital share activity
Shares outstanding, at beginning of period8,078,627 8,396,435 
Shares issued from reinvestment of stockholder distributions70,684 101,756 
Shares repurchased— (419,564)
Shares outstanding, at end of period8,149,311 8,078,627 


See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-9


Terra Income Fund 6, LLC
(Successor of Terra Income Fund 6, Inc.)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Successor Basis)
Three Months Ended December 31, 2022
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income$208,982 
Adjustments to reconcile net income from operations to net cash used in operating activities:
Provision for loan losses3,937,050 
Amortization of premiums and discounts on investments(3,225,285)
Amortization and accretion of investment-related fees, net(71,800)
Amortization of discount on debt 272,904 
 Income from equity investment in excess of distributions received(13,691)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Increase in interest receivable(74,000)
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets(121,775)
Decrease in interest reserve and other deposits held on investments(45,257)
Decrease in due to Adviser, net(682,541)
Decrease in interest payable from obligations under participation agreements(53,186)
Decrease in accrued expenses(141,459)
Decrease in other liabilities(135,401)
Net cash used in operating activities(145,459)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Origination and purchase of loans(7,697,768)
Purchase of equity interest in unconsolidated investment(10,000,000)
Repayment of loans615 
Net cash used in investing activities(17,697,153)
Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(17,842,612)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, at beginning of period24,582,565 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, at end of period (Note 2)
$6,739,953 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest $1,084,124 
Income taxes paid$128,114 
Supplemental non-cash investing activities
Loan contributed by Terra Property Trust, Inc.$6,131,528 
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-10


Terra Income Fund 6, LLC
(Successor of Terra Income Fund 6, Inc.)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Predecessor Basis)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022Year Ended December 31, 2021
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations$(1,714,212)$4,086,245 
Adjustments to reconcile net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from
   operations to net cash used in operating activities:
Net change in unrealized depreciation (appreciation) on investments3,444,211 (943,375)
Net change in unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on obligations under participation agreements(42,128)67,533 
Net realized gain on investments(55,783)(582,710)
Amortization and accretion of investment-related fees, net(731,252)(1,005,190)
Amortization of discount on debt issuance273,293 213,918 
Amortization of deferred financing costs182,974 193,905 
Paid-in-kind interest, net— (94,524)
Purchases of investments(48,077,115)(143,878,505)
Repayments and proceeds from sale of investments42,927,659 103,333,211 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in interest receivable83,407 (1,076,263)
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets259,480 96,322 
Increase (decrease) in interest reserve and other deposits held on investments35,996 (374,698)
(Decrease) increase in due to related party(3,108,922)3,108,922 
(Decrease) increase in due to Adviser, net(160,499)339,148 
Increase in accrued expenses89,187 201,875 
Increase (decrease) in interest payable from obligations under participation
   agreements
53,186 (93,618)
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities(378,215)745,093 
Net cash used in operating activities(6,918,733)(35,662,711)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from borrowings under term loan payable19,937,500 4,375,000 
Payments of stockholder distributions(2,118,351)(2,892,879)
Proceeds from obligations under participation agreements1,225,275 25,949,149 
Proceeds from issuance of unsecured notes payable, net of discount— 37,175,781 
Repayment of obligations under participation agreements— (25,728,138)
Payments for repurchases of common stock — (3,771,188)
Payments of financing costs— (1,290,829)
Net cash provided by financing activities19,044,424 33,816,896 
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash12,125,691 (1,845,815)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, at beginning of period12,456,874 14,302,689 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, at end of period (Note 2)
$24,582,565 $12,456,874 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest$3,229,592 $3,914,408 
Income taxes paid$626,413 $101,121 
Supplemental non-cash information:
Reinvestment of stockholder distributions$641,631 $922,624 
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-11


Terra Income Fund 6, LLC
(Successor of Terra Income Fund 6, Inc.)
Consolidated Schedule of Investments (Predecessor Basis)
December 31, 2021

Portfolio Company (1)
Collateral LocationProperty 
Type
Coupon
Rate
(2)
Current Interest RateExit FeeAcquisition DateMaturity DatePrincipalAmortized
Cost
Fair
Value
(3)
% of Net Assets (4)
Loan investments — non-controlled        
Mezzanine loans:
Dwight Mezz II, LLCUS - CAStudent
   housing
11.00%11.00%0.00%5/11/20175/6/2027$3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,730 4.1 %
Havemeyer TSM LLC (5)(7)
US - NYMixed-use15.00%15.00%1.00%12/18/202012/1/20226,808,000 6,810,164 6,874,428 9.3 %
     9,810,164 9,875,158 13.4 %
Preferred equity investments:
RS JZ Driggs, LLC (6)(7)(8)
US - NYMultifamily12.25%12.25%1.00%5/1/20181/1/20217,806,257 7,847,256 7,877,552 10.7 %
370 Lex Part Deux, LLC (6)(7)
US - NYOffice
LIBOR + 8.25% (2.44% Floor)
10.69%0.00%12/17/20181/9/202321,004,423 21,002,365 20,250,306 27.5 %
Ann Street JV LLCUS - GAMultifamily14.00%14.00%1.00%11/12/20216/7/20245,444,016 5,320,560 5,482,725 7.5 %
    34,170,181 33,610,583 45.7 %
First mortgages:
American Gilsonite CompanyUS - UTInfrastructure14.00%14.00%1.00%8/31/20218/31/202321,250,000 21,108,623 21,417,965 29.1 %
Hillsborough Owners LLC (9)(10)
US - NCMixed-use
LIBOR + 8.00% (0.25% Floor)
8.25%1.00%10/27/202111/1/202316,210,029 16,026,455 16,279,593 22.1 %
37,135,078 37,697,558 51.2 %
Credit facility:
Post Brothers Holdings LLC (11)(12)(13)
N/AN/A15.00%15.00%1.00%7/16/20217/16/202415,000,000 14,897,294 15,100,246 20.6 %
William A. Shopoff & Cindy I.
   Shopoff (6)(7)(13)
US - CAIndustrial15.00%15.00%1.00%10/4/20214/4/202313,237,500 13,121,112 13,347,088 18.1 %
28,018,406 28,447,334 38.7 %
Total loan investments — non-controlled    $109,133,829 $109,630,633 149.0 %
Portfolio Company (1)
IndustryDividend YieldAcquisition DateMaturity DateSharesCostFair
Value
% of Net Assets (4)
Marketable securities — non-controlled (14):
Common and preferred shares
Nexpoint Real Estate Finance, Inc. - Series A Preferred SharesREIT8.5 %7/30/20207/24/202533,560 $789,335 $879,272 1.2 %
Total marketable securities — non-controlled$789,335 $879,272 1.2 %
Total investments — non-controlled$109,923,164 $110,509,905 150.2 %
F-12


_______________
(1)All of Terra BDC’s investments are issued by eligible portfolio companies, as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the rules promulgated thereunder. All of the Company’s borrowers are in the diversified real estate industry.
(2)Some of the Company’s investments provide for coupon rate indexed to LIBOR or prime rate and in both cases subject to a floor.
(3)Because there is no readily available market for these investments, these investments are valued using significant unobservable inputs under Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and are approved in good faith by the Company’s board of directors.
(4)Percentages are based on net assets of $73.6 million as of December 31, 2021.
(5)Participation interest is with Mavik Real Estate Special Opportunities Fund REIT, LLC. The Company is committed to fund up to $7.4 million on this investment. As of December 31, 2021, the unfunded commitment was $0.6 million.
(6)Participation interest is with Terra Property Trust, Inc., a related-party real estate investment trust managed by an affiliate of the Company’s sponsor.
(7)The Company acquired these investments through participation agreements. See “Participation Agreements” in Note 5 in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
(8)This investment is currently in maturity default. The Company has exercised its rights and is facilitating the completion of construction of the underlying asset in anticipation of lease up and disposition of the asset.
(9)The loan participation from the Company does not qualify for sale accounting and therefore, this loan remains in the Consolidated Schedule of Investments. See Participation Agreements in Note 5 in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.  
(10)The Company sold a portion of its interest in this investment to Terra Property Trust, Inc. pursuant to a participation agreement.
(11)On July 16, 2021, the Company originated a $15.0 million unsecured corporate credit facility. The borrower is a multifamily operator in Philadelphia, PA.
(12)The borrower also pays a 1.0% fee on the unused portion of the credit facility.
(13)As of December 31, 2021, the facility was fully funded.
(14)From time to time, the Company may invest in debt and equity securities.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.












F-13



Terra Income Fund 6, LLC
(Successor of Terra Income Fund 6, Inc.)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1. Principal Business and Organization
Terra Income Fund 6, LLC (formerly “Terra Merger Sub, LLC”) (“Terra LLC”) was formed as a Delaware limited liability company on April 29, 2022 as a wholly owned subsidiary of Terra Property Trust, Inc. (“Terra REIT”). On October 1, 2022, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 2, 2022 (as amended, the “Merger Agreement”), Terra Income Fund 6, Inc. (“Terra BDC”) merged with and into Terra LLC, with Terra LLC continuing as the surviving entity of the merger (the “Merger”) (Note 4). Subsequent to the Merger, Terra LLC became the successor of Terra BDC and assumed all of Terra BDC’s rights and obligations. As context requires, the “Company” refers to Terra BDC prior to the Merger and its successor, Terra LLC, after the Merger.
Terra BDC was incorporated under the general corporation laws of the State of Maryland on May 15, 2013. On March 2, 2015, Terra BDC filed a public registration statement on Form N-2 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to offer a minimum of $2.0 million of common stock and a maximum of $1.0 billion of common stock in a continuous public offering (the “Offering”). Terra BDC formally commenced operations on June 24, 2015, upon raising gross proceeds in excess of $2.0 million from sales of shares of its common stock in the Offering, including sales to persons who were affiliated with Terra BDC or its adviser, Terra Income Advisors, LLC (“Terra Income Advisors” or the “Adviser”). During the offering period, which ended on April 20, 2018, Terra BDC sold 8,878,606 shares of common stock, including shares purchased by Terra Capital Partners, LLC (“Terra Capital Partners”),Terra BDC’s sponsor, and excluding shares sold through the distribution reinvestment plan (“DRIP”), in both an initial private placement and from the Offering, for gross proceeds of $103.6 million. Terra BDC elected to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). On September 29, 2022, Terra BDC withdrew its election to be regulated as a BDC. Terra BDC was an externally managed, non-diversified, closed-end management investment company that elected to be taxed and qualified annually thereafter, as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Subsequent to the Merger, Terra LLC’s sole member is responsible for paying tax, if any, on the Company’s taxable income.
Terra BDC’s investment activities were externally managed by Terra Income Advisors, a private investment firm affiliated with Terra BDC, pursuant to an investment advisory and administrative services agreement (the “Investment Advisory Agreement”), under the oversight of Terra BDC’s board of directors (the “Terra BDC Board”), a majority of whom were independent directors. In connection with the Merger, the Investment Advisory Agreement was terminated and the former members of the Terra BDC Board were elected to the board of directors of Terra REIT (the “Terra REIT Board”). Terra LLC does not have a board of directors and Terra REIT is the sole and managing member of Terra LLC. Terra REIT’s investments activities are externally managed by Terra REIT Advisors, LLC (“REIT Manager”), an affiliate of the Company.
Terra BDC previously retained Terra Capital Markets, LLC (“Terra Capital Markets”), an affiliate of Terra Income Advisors, to serve as the dealer manager of the Offering pursuant to the second amended and restated dealer manager agreement dated September 30, 2017 between Terra BDC and Terra Capital Markets (the “Dealer Manager Agreement”). As the dealer manager, Terra Capital Markets was responsible for marketing Terra BDC’s shares being offered pursuant to the Offering, which ended on April 20, 2018. On December 23, 2020, Terra Capital Markets assigned certain of its administrative functions and certain obligations under the Dealer Manager Agreement to Terra BDC (see Note 5).
In February 2021, Terra BDC issued $38.4 million in aggregate principal amount of 7.00% fixed-rate notes due 2026, for net proceeds of $37.2 million, after deducting underwriting commissions of $1.2 million, see “Unsecured Notes Payable” in Note 6 for more information.
On April 1, 2021, Mavik Capital Management, LP (“Mavik”), an entity controlled by Vikram S. Uppal, the then Chief Executive Officer of Terra BDC, completed a series of related transactions that resulted in all of the outstanding interests in Terra Capital Partners being acquired by Mavik for a combination of cash and interests in Mavik (the “Recapitalization”). Following the series of transactions described below, Terra Income Advisors is ultimately controlled by Mavik.
Prior to the Recapitalization, Terra Capital Partners was the immediate parent and managing member of Terra Income Advisors, and was ultimately controlled by Axar Real Estate Capital Group LLC (“Axar RE Manager”). In connection with the Recapitalization, Axar RE Manager assumed direct control of Terra Income Advisors by becoming its manager. Thus, the same parties that controlled Terra Income Advisors prior to the consummation of the Recapitalization maintained control of Terra Income Advisors, and by the terms of the Recapitalization continued to do so until a new investment advisory and administrative services agreement between Terra BDC and Terra Income Advisors was approved by the affirmative vote of a
F-14


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders of Terra BDC on September 22, 2021. Subsequent to the approval of the new investment advisory agreement, Axar RE Manager ceased to be the manager of the Adviser and Terra Capital Partners again became the managing member of Terra Income Advisors.
The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Terra REIT and its investment objective is to provide attractive risk-adjusted returns to Terra REIT’s stockholders, primarily through Terra REIT’s regular distributions. The Company structures, acquires and maintains a portfolio of investments that generate a stable income stream. The Company directly structures, underwrites and originates most of its investments, as it believes that doing so will provide it with the best opportunity to invest in loans that satisfy its standards, establish a direct relationship with the borrower and optimize the terms of its investments; however, the Company may acquire existing loans from the originating lender should its adviser determine such an investment is in its best interest. The Company may hold its investments until their scheduled maturity dates or may sell them if the Company is able to command favorable terms for their disposition. The Company may also seek to realize growth in the value of its investments by timing their sale to maximize value.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying annual consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”), and include the accounts of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. The accompanying annual consolidated financial statements of the Company and related financial information have been prepared pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-K and Articles 6 or 10 of Regulation S-X. Prior to the Merger, Terra BDC operated as and met the criteria of an investment company, as defined under U.S. GAAP, and applied accounting and reporting guidance in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946, Financial Services — Investment Companies (the “Predecessor Basis”). As a result, in the change in business after the Merger, Terra LLC does not meet the requirements to be classified as an investment company starting on October 1, 2022, and as such, it is an operating company and reports its investments at historical cost (the “Successor Basis”). The consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments and reclassifications that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for the fair presentation of the results of operations and financial condition as of and for the periods presented. The consolidated financial statements as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2022, and the year ended December 31, 2021, reflect Terra BDC’s financial results as an investment company. The consolidated financial statements as of and for the three months ended December 31, 2022, reflect Terra LLC’s financial results as an operating company.
Consolidation
As provided under Regulation S-X and ASC Topic 946, the Terra BDC generally did not consolidate its investment in a company other than an investment company or controlled operating company whose business consists of providing services to Terra BDC. Accordingly, Terra BDC consolidated the accounts of its wholly-owned subsidiaries that meet the aforementioned criteria in its consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021.
Terra LLC consolidates entities in which it has a controlling financial interest based on either the variable interest entity (“VIE”) or voting interest model. Terra LLC is required to first apply the VIE model to determine whether it holds a variable interest in an entity, and if so, whether the entity is a VIE. If Terra LLC determines it does not hold a variable interest in a VIE, it then applies the voting interest model. Under the voting interest model, Terra LLC consolidates an entity when it holds a majority voting interest in an entity.
Terra LLC accounts for investments in which it has significant influence but not a controlling financial interest using the equity method of accounting. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments, with original maturities of ninety days or less when purchased, as cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents held at financial institutions, at times, may exceed the amount insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash represents cash held as additional collateral by the Company on behalf of the borrowers related to the investments for the purpose of such borrowers making interest and property-related operating payments. There is a corresponding liability of the same amount on the statements of assets and liabilities called “Interest reserve and other deposits held on investments.”
F-15


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets to the total amount shown in its statements of cash flows:
December 31, 2022September 30, 2022December 31, 2021
Cash and cash equivalents$6,524,596 $24,321,951 $12,232,256 
Restricted cash215,357 260,614 224,618 
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash shown in the
   consolidated statements of cash flows
$6,739,953 $24,582,565 $12,456,874 
Loans Held for Investment
The Company originates, acquires, and structures, or acquired through participations, real estate-related loans generally to be held to maturity (collectively the “loans”). Loans held for investment are carried at the principal amount outstanding, adjusted for the accretion of discounts on investments and exit fees, and the amortization of premiums on investments and origination fees. The Company’s preferred equity investments, which are economically similar to mezzanine loans and subordinate to any loans but senior to common equity, are accounted for as loans held for investment. Loans are carried at cost less allowance for loan losses.
Prior to the Merger and under Predecessor Basis of accounting, the Company’s investments were reported at fair value, with the changes in fair value recorded as changes in unrealized gains or losses on investments in the consolidated statements of operations.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The Company’s loans are typically collateralized by either the sponsors’ equity interest in the real estate properties or the underlying real estate properties. As a result, the Company regularly evaluates the extent and impact of any credit migration associated with the performance and/or value of the underlying collateral property as well as the financial and operating capability of the borrower/sponsor on a loan-by-loan basis. Specifically, a property’s operating results and any cash reserves are analyzed and used to assess (i) whether cash from operations and/or reserve balances are sufficient to cover the debt service requirements currently and into the future; (ii) the ability of the borrower to refinance the loan; and/or (iii) the property’s liquidation value. The Company also evaluates the financial wherewithal of the sponsor as well as its competency in managing and operating the real estate property. In addition, the Company considers the overall economic environment, real estate sector, and geographic sub-market in which the borrower operates. Such analyses are completed and reviewed by asset management and finance personnel, who utilize various data sources, including (i) periodic financial data such as debt service coverage ratio, property occupancy, tenant profile, rental rates, operating expenses, the borrower’s exit plan, the capitalization and discount rates; (ii) site inspections; and (iii) current credit spreads and discussions with market participants.
    The REIT Manager performs a quarterly evaluation for possible impairment of the Company’s portfolio of loans. A loan is impaired if it is deemed probable that the Company will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. Impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Upon measurement of impairment, the Company records an allowance to reduce the carrying value of the loan with a corresponding charge to net income.
    In conjunction with the quarterly evaluation of loans not considered impaired, the REIT Manager assesses the risk factors of each loan and assigns each loan a risk rating between 1 and 5, which is an average of the numerical ratings in the following categories: (i) sponsor capability and financial condition; (ii) loan and collateral performance relative to underwriting; (iii) quality and stability of collateral cash flows and/or reserve balances; and (iv) loan to value. Based on a 5-point scale, the Company’s loans are rated “1” through “5”, from less risk to greater risk, as follows:
Risk RatingDescription
1Very low risk
2Low risk
3Moderate/average risk
4Higher risk
5Highest risk
F-16


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    The Company records an allowance for loan losses equal to (i) 1.5% of the aggregate carrying amount of loans rated as a “4”, plus (ii) 5% of the aggregate carrying amount of loans rated as a “5”, plus (iii) impaired loan reserves, if any.
    There may be circumstances where the Company modifies a loan by granting the borrower a concession that it might not otherwise consider when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty or is expected to experience financial difficulty in the foreseeable future. Such concessionary modifications are classified as troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) unless the modification solely results in a delay in a payment that is insignificant. Loans classified as TDRs are considered impaired loans for reporting and measurement purposes.
Revenue Recognition
    Revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.
    Interest Income: Interest income is accrued based upon the outstanding principal amount and contractual terms of the loans and preferred equity investments that the Company expects to collect and it is accrued and recorded on a daily basis. Discounts and premiums on investments purchased are accreted or amortized over the expected life of the respective loan using the effective yield method, and are included in interest income in the consolidated statements of operations. Loan origination fees and exit fees, net of portions attributable to obligations under participation agreements, are capitalized and amortized or accreted to interest income over the life of the investment using the effective yield method. Income accrual is generally suspended for loans at the earlier of the date at which payments become 90 days past due or when, in the opinion of the Manager, recovery of income and principal becomes doubtful. Outstanding interest receivable is assessed for recoverability. Interest is then recorded on the basis of cash received until accrual is resumed when the loan becomes contractually current and performance is demonstrated to be resumed. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans may be recognized as income or applied to principal depending upon management’s judgment regarding collectability.
    The Company holds loans in its portfolio that contain paid-in-kind (“PIK”) interest provisions. The PIK interest, which represents contractually deferred interest that is added to the principal balance that is due at maturity, is recorded on the accrual basis.    
    Other Revenues: Prepayment fee income is recognized as prepayments occur. All other income is recognized when earned.
Valuation of Investments
The Company determines the value of its investments on a quarterly basis in accordance with fair value accounting guidance promulgated under U.S. GAAP, which establishes a three-tier hierarchical disclosure framework that prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability used in measuring investments at fair value. These tiers include:
Level 1 — observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets. Publicly listed equities, debt securities and publicly listed derivatives will be included in Level 1.
Level 2 — observable inputs such as for similar securities in active markets and quoted prices for identical securities in markets that are not active. In certain cases, debt and equity securities are valued on the basis of prices from an orderly transaction between market participants provided by reputable dealers or pricing services. In determining the value of a particular investment, pricing services may use certain information with respect to transactions in such investments, quotations from dealers, pricing matrices, market transactions in comparable investments and various relationships between investments. Investments which are generally expected to be included in this category include corporate bonds and loans, convertible debt indexed to publicly listed securities and certain over-the-counter derivatives.
Level 3 — unobservable inputs for which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant judgment or estimation.
Market price observability is affected by a number of factors, including the type of investment and the characteristics specific to the investment. Investments with readily available actively quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices, generally, will have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair value. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires subjective judgment and consideration of factors specific to the investment. The fair values of the Company’s loan investments were determined in good faith by the Terra BDC Board prior to the Merger and are determined in good faith by the Terra REIT Board after the Merger pursuant to the valuation policy and consistently applied
F-17


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
valuation process. It is expected that the Company’s investments will primarily be classified as Level 3 investments. The fair value of the Company’s marketable securities, if any, is determined based on quoted prices in an active market and is classified as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
Valuation of Obligations under Participation Agreements
Prior to the Merger, the Company elected the fair value option under ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments under Predecessor Basis accounting, relating to accounting for debt obligations at their fair value for obligations under participation agreements which arose due to partial loan sales which did not meet the criteria for sale treatment under ASC Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing. The Company employed the yield approach valuation methodology used for the real-estate related loan investments on its obligations under participation agreements.
Deferred Debt Issuance Costs
The Company records issue discounts and other financing costs related to its debt obligation as deferred debt issuance costs, which are presented as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the related debt liability. These expenses are deferred and amortized using the effective interest method over the stated maturity of the debt obligation.
Stockholder Dividends and Distributions  
Dividends and distributions to stockholders, which were determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, were recorded on the declaration date. The amount to be paid out as a dividend or distribution was approved by the Terra BDC Board. Net realized capital gains, if any, were generally distributed or deemed distributed at least annually. Terra BDC adopted an “opt in” DRIP pursuant to which stockholders may elect to have the full amount of stockholders cash distributions reinvested in additional shares of common stock. Participants in the DRIP were free to elect to participate or terminate participation in the plan within a reasonable time as specified in the plan. For stockholders who have opted in to the DRIP, they had their cash distributions reinvested in additional shares of common stock, rather than receiving the cash distributions. Pursuant to the DRIP, shares were issued at a price equal to Terra BDC’s most recently disclosed net asset value (“NAV”) per share of its common stock immediately prior to the applicable distribution payment date. In connection with the Merger, the DRIP was terminated and Terra REIT will make monthly distributions to stockholders. On January 20, 2023, the Terra REIT Board adopted a distribution reinvestment plan (the “Plan”), pursuant to which Terra REIT’s stockholders may elect to reinvest cash distributions payable by Terra REIT in additional shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, at the price per share determined pursuant to the Plan.
Incentive Fee on Capital Gains
Pursuant to the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement, the incentive fee on capital gains was determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or upon termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement). This fee equaled 20.0% of Terra BDC’s incentive fee on capital gains, which equaled the realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception, calculated as of the end of the applicable period, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gains incentive fees. On a quarterly basis, Terra BDC accrued (but did not pay) for the capital gains incentive fee by calculating such fee as if it were due and payable as of the end of such period. While the Investment Advisory Agreement neither included nor contemplated the inclusion of unrealized gains in the calculation of the capital gains incentive fee, pursuant to an interpretation of an American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Technical Practice Aid for investment companies, Terra BDC accrued for this incentive fee to include unrealized gains in the calculation of the capital gains incentive fee expense and related accrued capital gains incentive fee. This accrual reflected the incentive fees that would be payable to Terra Income Advisors if Terra BDC’s entire portfolio was liquidated at its fair value as of the balance sheet date even though Terra Income Advisors was not entitled to an incentive fee with respect to unrealized gains unless and until such gains are actually realized.
In connection with the Merger, the Investment Advisory Agreement was terminated and the Company no longer pays any fees to the Adviser. Such fees are now payable by Terra REIT pursuant to its management agreement with the REIT Manager. Terra LLC and Terra REIT have entered into a cost sharing and reimbursement agreement (the “Cost Sharing Agreement”) pursuant to which Terra LLC will be responsible for its allocable share of Terra REIT’s expenses, including fees paid by Terra REIT to the REIT Manager.
Servicing Fee
Terra BDC paid selected dealers a servicing fee at an annual rate of 0.75% of the most recently published NAV per share, excluding shares sold through the DRIP, in exchange for providing certain administrative support services (Note 5) to stockholders such as establishing and maintaining stockholder accounts, customer service support and assisting stockholders in
F-18


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
changing account options, account designations and account addresses. The servicing fee was recorded as expense on the consolidated statements of operations in the period in which it was incurred.
Income Taxes  
Terra BDC elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code commencing with its short taxable year beginning October 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2018. In order to qualify as a REIT, Terra BDC was required, among other things, to distribute dividends equal to at least 90% of its REIT net taxable income to the stockholders annually and meet certain tests regarding the nature of its income and assets. To the extent any of Terra BDC’s taxable income was not previously distributed, Terra LLC will make a dividend declaration pursuant to Section 858(a)(1) of the Code, allowing Terra LLC to treat certain dividends that were to be distributed after the close of a taxable year as having been paid during the taxable year. As a REIT, Terra BDC was not subject to U.S. federal income taxes on income and gains distributed to the stockholders as long as certain requirements were satisfied, principally relating to the nature of income and the level of distributions, as well as other factors. If Terra BDC failed to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year and did not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, Terra BDC would be subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes at regular corporate rates beginning with the year in which it failed to qualify and may be precluded from being able to elect to be treated as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years. For the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and the year ended December 31, 2021, Terra BDC satisfied all the requirements for a REIT. Subsequent to the Merger, Terra REIT, the sole member of Terra LLC, will be responsible for paying tax, if any, on the Company’s taxable income.
Terra BDC held certain portfolio company investments through consolidated taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”). Such subsidiaries may be subject to U.S. federal and state corporate-level income taxes. These consolidated subsidiaries recognized deferred tax assets and liabilities for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences between the tax basis of certain assets and liabilities and the reported amounts included in the accompanying consolidated statements of assets and liabilities using the applicable statutory tax rates in effect for the year in which any such temporary differences are expected to reverse.
Terra BDC did not have any uncertain tax positions that met the recognition or measurement criteria under accounting for income taxes, nor did Terra BDC have any unrecognized tax benefits as of the periods presented herein. Terra BDC recognized interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax liabilities as income tax expense in its statements of operations. For the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and the year ended December 31, 2021, Terra BDC did not incur any interest or penalties. Terra BDC’s 2019-2022 federal tax years remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and the state department of revenue.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and reported amounts of income, expenses and gains and losses during the reporting period. Actual results may ultimately differ from those estimates, and those differences could be material.
The consolidated financial statements include loan investments at fair value of $109.6 million and obligations under participation agreements at fair value of $4.9 million at December 31, 2021. These fair values have been determined in good faith by the BDC Board. Because of the inherent uncertainty of valuation, the determined values may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for the investments and obligations under participation agreements, and the differences could be material.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”). ASU 2016-13 introduces a new model for recognizing credit losses on financial instruments based on an estimate of current expected credit losses. In April 2019, the FASB issued additional amendments to clarify the scope of ASU 2016-13 and address issues related to accrued interest receivable balances, recoveries, variable interest rates and prepayments, among other things. In May 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-05 — Targeted Transition Relief, which provides an option to irrevocably elect the fair value option for certain financial assets previously measured at amortized cost basis. In October 2019, the FASB decided that for smaller reporting companies, ASU 2016-13 and related amendments will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company meets the definition of a smaller reporting company under the regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company adopted this ASU and related amendments on January 1, 2023. The adoption of ASU 2016-13 resulted in an incremental reserve of an approximately
F-19


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
$0.7 million, which included reserve on future loan funding commitments. The Company will record the cumulative effect of initially applying this guidance as an adjustment to member’s equity using the modified retrospective method of adoption.
LIBOR is a benchmark interest rate referenced in a variety of agreements that are used by all types of entities. In July 2017, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates the LIBOR administrator, ICE Benchmark Administration Limited (“IBA”), announced that it would cease to compel banks to participate in setting LIBOR as a benchmark by the end of 2021, which has subsequently been delayed to June 30, 2023. In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848) — Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting (“ASU 2020-04”). The amendments in ASU 2020-04 provide optional expedients and exceptions for applying U.S. GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The amendments apply only to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. In January 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2021-01, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848), which expanded the scope of Topic 848 to include derivative instruments impacted by discounting transition (“ASU 2021-01”). In December 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-06, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848) — Deferral the Sunset Date of Topic 848 (“ASU 2022-06”). ASU 2022-06 deferred the sunset date of ASU 2020-04 to December 31, 2024. In the event LIBOR is unavailable, the Company’s investment documents provide for a substitute index, on a basis generally consistent with market practice, intended to put the Company in substantially the same economic position as LIBOR. As a result, the Company has not adopted the new ASUs and does not expect the reference rate reform and the adoption of ASU 2020-04 and ASU 2021-01 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.    
Note 3. Loans Held for Investment
Portfolio Summary
The following table provides a summary of the Company’s loan portfolio:
December 31, 2022
Fixed Rate
Floating
Rate
(1)(2)
Total
Number of loans639
Principal balance$61,913,795 $61,826,028 $123,739,823 
Carrying value$62,781,893 $58,631,133 $121,413,026 
Fair value$62,035,611 $58,244,737 $120,280,348 
Weighted-average coupon rate14.1%14.4%14.2%
Weighted-average remaining term (years)0.860.770.80
_______________
(1)These loans pay a coupon rate of LIBOR or Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”), as applicable, plus a fixed spread. Coupon rate shown was determined using LIBOR of 4.4% and average SOFR of 4.1% as of December 31, 2022 .
(2)As of December 31, 2022, three loans are subject to a LIBOR or SOFR floor, as applicable.
F-20


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Lending Activities
The following table presents the activities of the Company’s loan portfolio for the three months ended December 31, 2022:
Loans Held for InvestmentLoans Held for Investment through Participation InterestsTotal
Balance, October 1, 2022$76,311,192 $36,738,949 $113,050,141 
Purchase discounts1,251,334 54,363 1,305,697 
New loans made1,709,862 5,987,906 7,697,768 
Principal repayments received(615)— (615)
Net amortization of discounts on loans(280,076)3,505,361 3,225,285 
Accrual, payment and accretion of investment-related fees and other,
   net
90,953 (19,153)71,800 
Provision for loan losses— (3,937,050)(3,937,050)
Balance, December 31, 2022$79,082,650 $42,330,376 $121,413,026 
Portfolio Information
    The tables below detail the types of loans in the Company’s loan portfolio, as well as the property type and geographic location of the properties securing these loans:
December 31, 2022
Loan StructurePrincipal BalanceCarrying Value% of Total
Preferred equity investments$58,823,211 $59,521,319 49.0 %
First mortgages41,970,028 42,800,010 35.3 %
Credit facility16,664,376 16,797,348 13.8 %
Mezzanine loans6,282,208 6,231,399 5.1 %
Allowance for loan losses— (3,937,050)(3.2)%
Total$123,739,823 $121,413,026 100.0 %
December 31, 2022
Property TypePrincipal BalanceCarrying Value% of Total
Mixed use$41,452,859 $42,227,836 34.7 %
Office23,655,377 23,655,377 19.5 %
Infrastructure21,250,000 21,705,029 17.9 %
Multifamily17,717,211 18,048,117 14.9 %
Industrial16,664,376 16,797,348 13.8 %
Student housing3,000,000 2,916,369 2.4 %
Allowance for loan losses— (3,937,050)(3.2)%
Total$123,739,823 $121,413,026 100.0 %

F-21


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2022
Geographic LocationPrincipal BalanceCarrying Value% of Total
United States
California$37,114,999 $37,531,542 30.8 %
New York29,437,256 29,470,078 24.3 %
Utah21,250,000 21,705,029 17.9 %
North Carolina20,720,028 21,094,981 17.4 %
Georgia15,217,540 15,548,446 12.8 %
Allowance for loan losses— (3,937,050)(3.2)%
Total$123,739,823 $121,413,026 100.0 %
Loan Risk Rating
    As described in Note 2, the REIT Manager evaluates the Company’s loan portfolio on a quarterly basis or more frequently as needed. In conjunction with the quarterly review of the Company’s loan portfolio, the REIT Manager assesses the risk factors of each loan, and assigns a risk rating based on a five-point scale with “1” being the lowest risk and “5” being the greatest risk.
     The following table allocates the principal balance and the carrying value of the Company’s loans based on the loan risk rating:
December 31, 2022
Loan Risk RatingNumber of LoansPrincipal BalanceCarrying Value% of Total
1— $— $— — %
2— — — — %
397,584,775 99,195,028 79.1 %
4 — — — — %
5— — — — %
Other (1)
26,155,048 26,155,048 20.9 %
$123,739,823 125,350,076 100.0 %
Allowance for loan losses(3,937,050)
Total, net of allowance for loan losses$121,413,026 
_______________
(1)Because these loans have an event of default, they are removed from the pool of loans on which a general allowance is calculated and are evaluated for collectability individually. As of December 31, 2022, the specific allowance for loan losses on these loans were $3.9 million as a result of a decline in the fair value of the respective collateral.
    As of December 31, 2022, we did not have any loans with risk ratings of “4” or “5”, and did not record any general allowance for loan losses for the three months ended December 31, 2022. Additionally, as of December 31, 2022, the Company had two loans deemed impaired and recorded specific allowance for loan losses of $3.9 million for the three months ended December 31, 2022.
F-22


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table presents the activity in the Company’s allowance for loan losses:
Three Months Ended December 31, 2022
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period$— 
Provision for loan losses3,937,050 
Charge-offs— 
Recoveries— 
Allowance for loan losses, end of period$3,937,050 
As of December 31, 2022, the Company had two loans that were in maturity and suspended interest income accrual of $0.9 million and $1.4 million on these two loans for the three months ended December 31, 2022 and nine months ended September 30, 2022, respectively, because recovery of such income was doubtful.
Equity Investment in Unconsolidated Investment                 
On December 28, 2022, the Company originated a $10.0 million mezzanine loan to a borrower to finance the acquisition of a real estate portfolio. Additionally, the Company entered into a residual profit sharing agreement with the borrower in which the borrower will pay the Company an additional amount of 35.0% of remaining net cash flow from the sale of the real estate portfolio. The Company accounts for the entire arrangement as equity investment in unconsolidated investment. As of December 31, 2022, the carrying value of the equity investment in unconsolidated investment was $10.0 million and the income from equity investment in unconsolidated investment was $0.01 million for the three months ended December 31, 2022.
Note 4. Fair Value Measurements
The following tables show the composition of the investment portfolio, at amortized cost and fair value (with corresponding percentage of total portfolio investments):
December 31, 2021 (Predecessor Basis)
Investments at
Amortized Cost
Percentage of
Amortized Cost
Investments at
Fair Value
Percentage of
Fair Value
Loans$60,352,932 54.9 %$61,281,259 55.4 %
Loans through participation interest (Note 5)
48,780,897 44.4 %48,349,374 43.8 %
Marketable securities789,335 0.7 %879,272 0.8 %
Total$109,923,164 100.0 %$110,509,905 100.0 %
Obligations under Participation Agreements
    The Company’s predecessor, Terra BDC, followed the fair value option under Predecessor Basis accounting, relating to accounting for debt obligations at their fair value for its obligations under participation agreements which arose due to partial loan sales which did not meet the criteria for sale treatment. The Company employed the same yield approach valuation methodology used for the real estate-related loan investments on the Company’s obligations under participation agreements. As of December 31, 2021, obligations under participation agreements at fair value was $4.9 million and the weighted average contractual interest rate on the obligations under participation agreements was 8.3%. For the nine months ended September 30, 2022, the Company transferred $1.2 million of investments to affiliates through participation agreements and did not make any repayments on obligations under participation agreements. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company transferred $25.9 million of investments to affiliates through participation agreements and made $25.7 million of repayments on obligations under participation agreements. On October 1, 2022, Terra REIT contributed to the Company a $6.1 million loan acquired through participation, at which time the related obligation under participation agreement was released. As of December 31, 2022, there was no obligations under participation agreement outstanding.
Valuation Methodology
    The fair value of the Company’s investment in preferred stock and common stock within the marketable securities portfolio, if any, is determined based on quoted prices in an active market and is classified as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Additionally, the fair value of the Company’s unsecured notes payable is determined based on quoted price in an active market and is also classified as Level 1.
F-23


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Market quotations are not readily available for the Company’s real estate-related loan investments, all of which are included in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, as these investments are valued utilizing a yield approach, i.e., a discounted cash flow methodology to arrive at an estimate of the fair value of each respective investment in the portfolio using an estimated market yield. In following this methodology, investments are evaluated individually, and management takes into account, in determining the risk-adjusted discount rate for each of the Company’s investments, relevant factors, including available current market data on applicable yields of comparable debt/preferred equity instruments; market credit spreads and yield curves; the investment’s yield; covenants of the investment, including prepayment provisions; the portfolio company’s ability to make payments, net operating income and debt service coverage ratio; construction progress reports and construction budget analysis; the nature, quality and realizable value of any collateral (and loan-to-value ratio); the forces that influence the local markets in which the asset (the collateral) is purchased and sold, such as capitalization rates, occupancy rates, rental rates and replacement costs; and the anticipated duration of each real estate-related loan investment.
These valuation techniques are applied in a consistent and verifiable manner to all investments that are categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and Terra Income Advisors provides the valuation committee of the Terra BDC Board, now the Terra REIT Board, (which is made up exclusively of independent directors) with portfolio security valuations that are based on this discounted cash flow methodology. Valuations are prepared quarterly, or more frequently as needed, with each asset in the portfolio subject to a valuation prepared by a third-party valuation service at a minimum of once during every 12-month period. The Terra BDC Board, now the Terra REIT Board, reviews the preliminary valuation with Terra Income Advisors and, together with an independent valuation firm, if applicable, responds and supplements the preliminary valuation to reflect any comments provided by the valuation committee. The Terra BDC Board, now the Terra REIT Board, discusses valuations and determines the fair value of each investment in the portfolio in good faith based on various metrics and other factors, including the input and recommendation provided by Terra Income Advisors, the valuation committee and any third-party valuation firm, if applicable.
The following tables present fair value measurements of investments, by major class, according to the fair value hierarchy:
December 31, 2021 (Predecessor Basis)
 Fair Value Measurements
 Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Investments:    
Loans$— $— $61,281,259 $61,281,259 
Loans through participation interest— — 48,349,374 48,349,374 
Marketable securities879,272 — — 879,272 
Total investments$879,272 $— $109,630,633 $110,509,905 
Obligations under participation agreements$— $— $4,883,877 $4,883,877 
F-24


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    Changes in the Company’s Level 3 investments for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and the year ended December 31, 2021 were as follows:
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022 (Predecessor Basis)
 
 Loans
Loans
Through
Participation
Total Loan
Investments
Obligations under
Participation Agreements
Balance as of January 1, 2022$61,281,259 $48,349,374 $109,630,633 $4,883,877 
Purchases of investments29,872,400 18,204,715 48,077,115 — 
Repayments of investments(15,000,000)(27,082,531)(42,082,531)— 
Net change in unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on
  investments
(435,327)(2,918,956)(3,354,283)— 
Amortization and accretion of investment-related fees, net592,860 186,347 779,207 47,955 
Proceeds from obligations under participation agreements— — — 1,225,275 
Net change in unrealized depreciation on obligations under
   participation agreements
— — — (42,128)
Balance as of September 30, 2022$76,311,192 $36,738,949 $113,050,141 $6,114,979 
Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation for
   the period relating to those Level 3 assets that were still
   held by the Company at the end of the period:
    
Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation on
   loan investments and obligations under participation
   agreements
$(232,375)$(2,918,947)$(3,151,322)$(42,128)
Year Ended December 31, 2021 (Predecessor Basis)
 
 Loans
Loans
Through
Participation
Total Loan
Investments
Obligations under
Participation Agreements
Balance as of January 1, 2021$20,209,473 $45,963,805 $66,173,278 $4,293,971 
Purchases of investments92,066,445 41,831,345 133,897,790 — 
Repayments of investments(52,520,000)(40,081,678)(92,601,678)— 
Net change in unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on
    investments
836,978 91,295 928,273 — 
PIK interest income, net— 94,524 94,524 — 
Amortization and accretion of investment-related fees, net688,363 6181891,306,552 301,362 
Realized loss on loan repayment— (168,106)(168,106)— 
Proceeds from obligations under participation agreements— — — 25,949,149 
Repayment of obligations under participation agreements— — — (25,728,138)
Net change in unrealized depreciation on obligations under
   participation agreements
— — — 67,533 
Balance as of December 31, 2021$61,281,259 $48,349,374 $109,630,633 $4,883,877 
Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation for
   the period relating to those Level 3 assets that were still
   held by the Company at the end of the period:
    
Net change in unrealized depreciation or appreciation on loan investments and obligations under participation agreements$894,733 $102,345 $997,078 $75,941 
    Transfers between levels, if any, are recognized at the beginning of the period in which transfers occur. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, there were no transfers.
F-25


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Significant Unobservable Inputs
The following table summarizes the significant unobservable inputs used by the Company to value the Level 3 investments as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. The table is not intended to be all-inclusive, but instead identifies the significant unobservable inputs relevant to the determination of fair values.
December 31, 2022 (Successor Basis)
  Primary
Valuation
Technique
Unobservable InputRangeWeighted
Asset CategoryFair ValueMinimumMaximumAverage
Assets:      
Loans$78,011,106 Discounted cash flowDiscount rate10.51 %19.36 %14.49 %
Loans through participation interest42,269,242 Discounted cash flowDiscount rate15.25 %16.61 %16.38 %
Total Level 3 Assets$120,280,348 
Liabilities:
Obligations under participation agreements$ — %— %— %
December 31, 2021 (Predecessor Basis)
  Primary
Valuation
Technique
Unobservable InputRangeWeighted
Asset CategoryFair ValueMinimumMaximumAverage
Assets:      
Loans$61,281,259 Discounted cash flowDiscount rate8.25 %15.00 %12.58 %
Loans through participation interest48,349,374 Discounted cash flowDiscount rate12.37 %15.00 %14.40 %
Total Level 3 Assets$109,630,633 
Liabilities:
Obligations under participation agreements$4,883,877 Discounted cash flowDiscount rate8.25 %8.25 %8.25 %
    If the weighted average discount rate used to value the Company’s investments were to increase, the fair value of the Company’s investments would decrease. Conversely, if the weighted average discount rate used to value the Company’s investments were to decrease, the fair value of Company’s investments would increase.
Financial Instruments Not Carried at Fair Value
The following table presents the carrying value, which represents the principal amount outstanding, adjusted for the accretion of purchase discounts on loans and exit fees, and the amortization of purchase premiums on loans and origination fees, and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments that are not carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets:
F-26


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company has not elected the fair value option for its unsecured notes payable and term loan payable (Note 6). The table below presents detailed information regarding the Company's financial assets at December 31, 2022 and 2021:
December 31, 2022 (Successor Basis)December 31, 2021 (Predecessor Basis)
LevelPrincipal BalanceCarrying ValueFair Value Principal BalanceCarrying ValueFair Value
Loans:
Loans held for investment33$77,638,191 $79,082,650 $78,011,106 N/AN/AN/A
Loans held for investment
   acquired through
   participation
3346,101,632 46,267,426 42,269,242 N/AN/AN/A
Allowance for loan losses— (3,937,050)— N/AN/AN/A
Total loans$123,739,823 $121,413,026 $120,280,348 
Liabilities:
Unsecured notes payable (1)(2)
1$38,375,000 $34,042,904 $35,381,748 $38,375,000 $36,497,612 $39,403,450 
Term loan payable (3)(4)
325,000,000 25,000,000 25,000,000 5,000,000 4,170,164 5,000,000 
$63,375,000 $59,042,904 $60,381,748 $43,375,000 $40,667,776 $44,403,450 
_______________
(1)Carrying value is net of unamortized purchase discount of $4.3 million as of December 31, 2022, and unamortized issue discount of $1.0 million and unamortized deferred financing costs of $0.9 million as of December 31, 2021.
(2)Valuation falls under Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy, which is based on the trading price of $23.05 and $25.67 as of the close of business day on December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
(3)Carrying value is net of unamortized issue discount of $0.6 million and unamortized deferred financing costs of $0.2 million as of December 31, 2021.
(4)Valuation falls under Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, which is based on a discounted cash flow model with a discount rate of 5.625%.
Note 5. Related Party Transactions
    Terra BDC entered into various agreements with Terra Income Advisors whereby Terra BDC paid and reimbursed Terra Income Advisors for certain fees and expenses. Additionally, Terra BDC paid Terra Capital Markets certain fees for providing certain administrative support services. In connection with the Merger, the Investment Advisory Agreement was terminated and the Company no longer pays or reimburses the following fees. Such fees are now payable by Terra REIT pursuant to its management agreement with its manager. Terra LLC and Terra REIT have entered into the Cost Sharing Agreement pursuant to which Terra LLC will be responsible for its allocable share of Terra REIT’s expenses, including fees paid by Terra REIT to its manager.
    The following table presents a summary of such fees and reimbursements in accordance with the terms of the related agreements:
Three Months Ended December 31, 2022 (1)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022Year Ended December 31, 2021
(Successor Basis)(Predecessor Basis)
Amounts Included in the Statements of Operations
Base management fees$395,129 $1,964,830 $2,182,947 
(Reversal of incentive fees) incentive fees on capital gains (2)
N/A(102,160)291,710 
Operating expense reimbursement to Adviser (3)
371,515 946,934 1,222,217 
_______________
(1)These fees were incurred pursuant to the Cost Sharing Agreement between Terra LLC and Terra REIT.
(2)For the nine months ended September 30, 2022 Terra BDC reversed previously accrued incentive fees on capital gains of $102,160. Incentive fees on capital gains were based on 20% of net realized and unrealized capital gains. No incentive fees on capital gains are actually payable by Terra BDC with respect to unrealized gains unless and until those gains are realized.
(3)Amounts were primarily compensation for time spent supporting the Company’s day-to-day operations.
F-27


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Due to Related Party
As of December 31, 2022, there was no amount due to related party. As of December 31, 2021, amount due to a related party was $3.1 million, primary related to reserve funding held by the Company on a loan originated by an affiliate. The reserve funding was transferred to the affiliate in February 2022.
Due to / Due from Adviser
The Company determines that it has the right of offset on the amounts due to and due from Terra Income Advisors under the guidance in ASC Topic 210, Balance Sheet. As such, the net amount is presented as Due to Adviser, net on the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities.
The following table presents a summary of Due to Adviser, net:
December 31,
2022 (1)
2021
Due to Adviser:  
Base management fee and expense reimbursement payable$— $551,330 
Incentive fees on capital gains (2)
— 291,710 
 $— $843,040 
_______________
(1)Subsequent to the Merger on October 1, 2022, all amounts due to Terra Income Advisors were settled.
(2)Incentive fees on capital gains are based on 20% of accumulated net realized and unrealized capital gains of $1.5 million as of December 31, 2021. No incentive fees on capital gains were actually payable by Terra BDC with respect to unrealized gains unless and until those gains are realized.
Merger
On October 1, 2022, pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, Terra BDC merged with and into Terra LLC, with Terra LLC continuing as the surviving entity of the Merger. Immediately following the Merger, Terra LLC remained a wholly owned subsidiary of Terra REIT. The Certificate of Merger and Articles of Merger with respect to the Merger were filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware and State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland, respectively, with an effective time and date of 12:02 a.m., Eastern Time, on October 1, 2022 (the “Effective Time”). Effective immediately following the Merger, Terra LLC changed its name to “Terra Income Fund 6, LLC.”
At the Effective Time, except for any shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Terra BDC (“Terra BDC Common Stock”) held by Terra REIT or any wholly owned subsidiary of Terra REIT or Terra BDC, which shares were automatically retired and ceased to exist with no consideration paid therefor, each issued and outstanding share of Terra BDC Common Stock was automatically cancelled and retired and converted into the right to receive (i) 0.595 shares of the newly designated Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Terra REIT (“Class B Common Stock”) and (ii) cash, without interest, in lieu of any fractional shares of Class B Common Stock otherwise issuable in an amount, rounded to the nearest whole cent, determined by multiplying (x) the fraction of a share of Class B Common Stock to which such holder would otherwise be entitled by (y) $14.38.
Pursuant to the terms of the transactions described in the Merger Agreement, 4,847,910 shares of Class B Common Stock were issued to former Terra BDC stockholders in connection with the Merger. Following the consummation of the Merger, former Terra BDC stockholders own approximately 19.9% of the common equity of Terra REIT as the combined company. In connection with the Merger, the Company incurred transaction costs totaling $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.
In connection with the Merger, Terra LLC assumed the obligations of Terra BDC under the Indenture and supplemental indentures between Terra BDC and the Trustee as well as the Credit Agreement with Eagle Point (Note 6). Additionally, the Investment Advisory Agreement between Terra BDC and the Adviser and the Servicing Plan were terminated and fees pursuant to such agreements are no longer payable. These advisory/management fees are now payable by the Company’s parent, Terra REIT, to its manager pursuant to the management agreement with its manager.
F-28


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Management and Incentive Fee Compensation to Adviser
Pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement, Terra Income Advisors was responsible for Terra BDC’s day-to-day operations. Pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement, Terra Income Advisors was paid for its services in two components — a base management fee and an incentive fee. The base management fee was calculated at an annual rate of 2.0% of Terra BDC’s average gross assets. The base management fee was payable quarterly in arrears and calculated based on the average value of Terra BDC’s gross assets at the end of the two most recently completed calendar quarters.
The incentive fee consists of two parts. The first part, which was referred to as the subordinated incentive fee on income, was calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based upon Terra BDC’s “pre-incentive fee net investment income” for the immediately preceding quarter. The subordinated incentive fee on income was subject to a quarterly hurdle rate, expressed as a rate of return on adjusted capital at the beginning of the most recently completed calendar quarter, of 2.0% (8.0% annualized), subject to a “catch-up” feature. For this purpose, “pre-incentive fee net investment income” meant interest income, dividend income and any other income (including any other fees, other than fees for providing managerial assistance, such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting fees or other fees that Terra BDC received from portfolio companies) accrued during the calendar quarter, minus Terra BDC’s operating expenses for the quarter (including the base management fee, expenses reimbursed to Terra Income Advisors under the Investment Advisory Agreement and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee). Pre-incentive fee net investment income includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount, debt instruments with PIK interest and zero-coupon securities), accrued income that the Company has not yet received in cash. Pre-incentive fee net investment income did not include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation. The calculation of the subordinated incentive fee on income for each quarter was as follows:
No incentive fee was payable to Terra Income Advisors in any calendar quarter in which Terra BDC’s pre-incentive fee net investment income does not exceed the hurdle rate of 2.0% (8.0% annualized);
100% of Terra BDC’s pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeded the hurdle rate but was less than or equal to 2.5% in any calendar quarter (10.0% annualized) was payable to Terra Income Advisors, all or any portion of which may be waived or deferred in Terra Income Advisors’s discretion. This portion of the pre-incentive fee net investment income (which exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.5%) was referred to as the “catch-up.” The catch-up provision was intended to provide Terra Income Advisors with an incentive fee of 20.0% on all of Terra BDC’s pre-incentive fee net investment income when Terra BDC’s pre-incentive fee net investment income reaches 2.5% in any calendar quarter; and
20.0% of the amount of Terra BDC’s pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeded 2.5% in any calendar quarter (10.0% annualized) was payable to Terra Income Advisors once the hurdle rate was reached and the catch-up was achieved.
The second part of the incentive fee, which was referred to as the incentive fee on capital gains, was an incentive fee on capital gains earned on liquidated investments from the portfolio and was determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement). This fee equaled 20.0% of Terra BDC’s incentive fee on capital gains, which equaled the realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception, calculated as of the end of the applicable period, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gains incentive fees. On a quarterly basis, Terra BDC accrued (but did not pay) for the unrealized capital gains incentive fee by calculating such fee as if it were due and payable as of the end of such period.
In connection with the Merger, the Investment Advisory Agreement was terminated and the Company no longer pays management and incentive fees to the Adviser. Such fees are now payable by Terra REIT pursuant to its management agreement with the REIT Manager. Terra REIT charges the Company for its allocable share of the management fees through the Cost Sharing Agreement.
Operating Expenses
Terra BDC reimbursed Terra Income Advisors for operating expenses incurred in connection with administrative services provided to Terra BDC, including compensation to administrative personnel. Terra BDC did not reimburse Terra Income Advisors for personnel costs in connection with services for which Terra Income Advisors receives a separate fee. In addition, Terra BDC did not reimburse Terra Income Advisors for (i) rent or depreciation, capital equipment or other costs of Terra Income Advisors’s own administrative items, or (ii) salaries, fringe benefits, travel expenses and other administrative items incurred or allocated to any controlling person of Terra Income Advisors. In connection with the Merger, the Company no
F-29


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
longer reimburses Terra Income Advisors for operating expenses incurred in connection with administrative services provided to the Company. Such expenses are now reimbursable by Terra REIT to the REIT Manager pursuant to its management agreement with the REIT manager. Terra REIT charges the Company for its allocable share of the operating expense reimbursement through the Cost Sharing Agreement.
Servicing Plan
On September 30, 2017, the Terra BDC Board adopted the servicing plan (the “Servicing Plan”). Pursuant to the Servicing Plan, Terra Capital Markets was entitled to receive a servicing fee at an annual rate of 1.125% of the most recently published NAV per share of Terra BDC’s common stock, of which up to 0.75% was reallowed to selected dealers, in exchange for providing certain administrative support services. With respect to each share sold, excluding shares sold through the DRIP, the servicing fee was payable annually on the anniversary of the applicable month of purchase.
On December 23, 2020, Terra Capital Markets assigned to Terra BDC certain of its administration support services and certain obligations under the Dealer Manager Agreement, including making future payments of the previously reallowed servicing fee under the Servicing Plan directly to selected dealers, effectively reducing the servicing fee to 0.75%. In connection with the Merger, the Servicing Plan was terminated.
Cost Sharing Agreement
On November 8, 2022, the Company entered into the Cost Sharing Agreement with Terra REIT effective October 1, 2022, pursuant to which the Company reimburses Terra REIT for its allocable portion of management and transaction fees and operating expenses incurred by Terra REIT, including fees paid by Terra REIT to the REIT Manager.
Terra REIT’s Management Agreement with Terra REIT Advisors

Terra REIT is our parent and sole managing member. We have entered into a cost sharing arrangement with Terra REIT pursuant to which we will be responsible for our allocable share of Terra REIT’s expenses, including fees paid by Terra REIT to its manager, Terra REIT Advisors. Terra REIT currently pays the following fees to Terra REIT Advisors pursuant to the Management Agreement:

Origination and Extension Fee. An origination fee in the amount of 1.0% of the amount used to originate, acquire, fund or structure real estate-related investments, including any third-party expenses related to such loan. In the event that the term of any real estate-related loan is extended, Terra REIT Advisors also receives an origination fee equal to the lesser of (i) 1.0% of the principal amount of the loan being extended or (ii) the amount of fee paid by the borrower in connection with such extension.

Asset Management Fee. A monthly asset management fee at an annual rate equal to 1.0% of the aggregate funds under management, which includes the loan origination amount or aggregate gross acquisition cost, as applicable, for each real estate-related loan and cash held by Terra REIT.

Asset Servicing Fee. A monthly asset servicing fee at an annual rate equal to 0.25% of the aggregate gross origination price or aggregate gross acquisition price for each real estate related loan then held by Terra REIT (inclusive of closing costs and expenses).

Disposition Fee. A disposition fee in the amount of 1.0% of the gross sale price received by Terra REIT from the disposition of each loan, but not upon the maturity, prepayment, workout, modification or extension of a loan unless there is a corresponding fee paid by the borrower, in which case the disposition fee will be the lesser of (i) 1.0% of the principal amount of the loan and ii) the amount of the fee paid by the borrower in connection with such transaction. If Terra REIT takes ownership of a property as a result of a workout or foreclosure of a loan, Terra REIT will pay a disposition fee upon the sale of such property equal to 1.0% of the sales price.

Transaction Breakup Fee. In the event that Terra REIT receive any “breakup fees,” “busted-deal fees,” termination fees, or similar fees or liquidated damages from a third-party in connection with the termination or non-consummation of any loan or disposition transaction, Terra REIT Advisors will be entitled to receive one-half of such amounts, in addition to the reimbursement of all out-of-pocket fees and expenses incurred by Terra REIT Advisors with respect to its evaluation and pursuit of such transactions.

F-30


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
In addition to the fees described above, Terra REIT reimburses Terra REIT Advisors for operating expenses incurred in connection with services provided to the operations of Terra REIT, including its allocable share of Terra REIT Advisors’ overhead, such as rent, employee costs, utilities, and technology costs.
Participation Agreements
The Company may enter into participation agreements with related and unrelated parties, primarily other affiliated funds of Terra REIT Advisors. The participation agreements provide the Company with the opportunity to invest along the same terms, conditions, price and rights in the specified investment. The purpose of the participation agreements is to allow the Company and an affiliate to originate a specified investment when, individually, the Company does not have the liquidity to do so or to achieve a certain level of portfolio diversification. The Company may transfer portions of its investments to other participants or it may be a participant to an investment held by another entity.
ASC Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing (“ASC 860”), establishes accounting and reporting standards for transfers of financial assets. ASC 860-10 provides consistent standards for distinguishing transfers of financial assets that are sales from transfers that are secured borrowings. The Company has determined that the participation agreements it enters into are accounted for as secured borrowings under ASC Topic 860.
Participation interest purchased by the Company: The below tables list the investment interests purchased by the Company via participation agreements (each, a “PA”) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. In accordance with the terms of each PA, each participant’s rights and obligations, including interest income and other income (e.g., exit fee and prepayment income) and related fees/expenses are based upon its respective pro-rata participation interest in such investments, as specified in the respective PA. The Company’s share of the investment is repayable only from the proceeds received from the related borrower/issuer of the investment, and therefore the Company is also subject to the credit risk (i.e., risk of default by the underlying borrower/issuer).
Pursuant to each PA, the affiliated fund receives and allocates the interest income and other related investment incomes in respect of the investment to the Company. The Company pays related expenses (i.e., the base management fee) directly to Terra Income Advisors prior to the Merger and to Terra REIT after the Merger.
December 31, 2022 (Successor Basis)December 31, 2021 (Predecessor Basis)
Participating InterestsPrincipal BalanceCarrying ValueParticipating InterestsPrincipal BalanceFair
Value
370 Lex Part Deux, LLC (1)
35.0 %23,655,377 23,655,377 35.0 %21,004,423 20,250,306 
William A. Shopoff & Cindy I.
   Shopoff (1)
66.7 %16,664,376 16,797,348 53.0 %13,237,500 13,347,088 
Havemeyer TSM LLC (2)
23.0 %3,282,208 3,315,030 23.0 %6,808,000 6,874,428 
RS JZ Driggs, LLC (1)
50.0 %2,499,671 2,499,671 50.0 %7,806,257 7,877,552 
Allowance for loan losses— (3,937,050)— — 
Total$46,101,632 $42,330,376 $48,856,180 $48,349,374 
_______________
(1)The loan is held in the name of Terra REIT, an affiliated entity managed by a subsidiary of Terra Capital Partners.
(2)The loan is held in the name of Mavik Real Estate Special Opportunities Fund REIT, LLC.
F-31


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Transfers of participation interests by the Company: As of December 31, 2022, there were no obligations under participation agreements outstanding. The following table summarizes the investments that were transferred to affiliates via PAs as of December 31, 2021:
December 31, 2021 (Predecessor Basis)
   Transfers treated as
obligations under participation agreements
 PrincipalFair Value% TransferredPrincipalFair Value
Hillsborough Owners LLC (1)
$16,210,029 $16,279,593 30.0 %$4,863,009 $4,883,877 
_______________
(1)Participant is Terra REIT. On October 1, 2022 and in connection with the Merger, Terra REIT contributed its investment acquired through participation agreement with the Company to back to the Company, at which time the Company extinguished the related obligation under participation agreement.
Co-investment
As a BDC, Terra BDC was subject to certain regulatory restrictions in making its investments. For example, Terra BDC may have been prohibited under the 1940 Act from knowingly participating in certain transactions with its affiliates without the prior approval of its Board who are not interested persons and, in some cases, prior approval by the SEC. The SEC granted Terra BDC exemptive relief permitting it, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, to co-invest in certain privately negotiated investment transactions with certain affiliates of Terra Income Advisors, including Terra Secured Income Fund, LLC, Terra Secured Income Fund 2, LLC, Terra Secured Income Fund 3, LLC, Terra Secured Income Fund 4, LLC, Terra Secured Income Fund 5, LLC, Terra Secured Income Fund 5 International, Terra Income Fund International and Terra Secured Income Fund 7, LLC, Terra REIT and any future BDC or closed-end management investment company that is registered under the 1940 Act and is advised by Terra Income Advisors or its affiliated investment advisers (the “Co-Investment Affiliates”). However, Terra BDC was prohibited from engaging in certain transactions with its affiliates even under the terms of this exemptive order. Terra LLC is not subject to any regulatory restrictions in making its investments.
Note 6. Debt
Senior Unsecured Notes
On February 10, 2021, Terra BDC issued $34.8 million in aggregate principal amount of 7.00% fixed-rate notes due 2026, for net proceeds of $33.7 million after deducting underwriting commissions of $1.1 million. On February 26, 2021, the underwriters exercised the option to purchase an additional $3.6 million of the notes for net proceeds of $3.5 million, after deducting underwriting commissions of $0.1 million. Interest on the notes is paid quarterly in arrears every March 30, June 30, September 30 and December 30, at a rate of 7.00% per year, beginning June 30, 2021. The notes mature on March 31, 2026. The notes may be redeemed in whole or in part at any time or from time to time at Terra BDC’s option on or after February 10, 2023. In connection with the issuance of the notes, Terra BDC incurred deferred financing costs totaling $1.0 million, to be amortized to interest expense over the term of the notes.
On October 1, 2022 in connection with the Merger, Terra BDC, Terra LLC and U.S. Bank National Association entered into a second supplemental indenture pursuant to which Terra LLC assumed the payment of the notes and the performance of every covenant of the indenture, to be performed or observed by Terra BDC.
The Indenture between Terra BDC and the trustee contained certain debt limitations and asset coverage covenants. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company was in compliance with the asset coverage ratio requirements under the Indenture.
F-32


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the three months ended December 31, 2022, nine months ended September 30, 2022 and the year ended December 31, 2021, the components of interest expense were as follows:
Three Months Ended
December 31, 2022
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022Year Ended December 31, 2021
Successor BasisPredecessor Basis
Stated interest expense$671,562 $2,014,687 $2,387,779 
Amortization of issue discount— 155,787 175,305 
Amortization of financing costs— 129,064 140,027 
Amortization of purchase discount (1)
272,904 — — 
Total interest expense$944,466 $2,299,538 $2,703,111 
Weighted average debt outstanding$38,375,000 $38,375,000 $34,010,616 
Cash paid for interest expense$671,562 $2,014,687 $2,387,779 
Stated interest rate7.00 %7.00 %7.00 %
Effective interest rate (2)
7.63 %7.63 %7.63 %
_______________
(1)The purchase discount was recorded in connection with the Merger (Note 5)
(2)The effective interest rate of the debt component is equal to the stated interest rate plus the amortization of issue discount.
Term Loan
On April 9, 2021, Terra BDC, as borrower, entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Eagle Point Credit Management LLC, as the administrative agent and collateral agent (“Eagle Point”), and certain funds and accounts managed by Eagle Point, as lenders (in such capacity, collectively, the “Lenders”). The Credit Agreement provides for (i) a delayed draw term loan to Terra BDC of $25.0 million (the “Term Loan”) and (ii) additional incremental loans in a minimum amount of $1.0 million and multiples of $0.5 million in excess thereof, which may be approved by a Lender in its sole discretion (“Incremental Loans,” and together with the Term Loan, the “Loans”).
The scheduled maturity date of the Loans was April 9, 2025. The Loans bear interest on the outstanding principal amount thereof at a rate equal to 5.625% per annum; provided that if at any time Terra BDC was rated below investment grade, the interest rate would increase to 6.625% until the rating is no longer below investment grade. In connection with the entry into the Credit Agreement, Terra BDC also agreed to pay Eagle Point an upfront fee in an amount equal to 2.50% of the loan commitment amount on the initial borrowing date as described in the Credit Agreement. Terra BDC also paid, with respect to any unused portion of the Term Loan, a commitment fee of 0.75% per annum.
In connection with entering into the Credit Agreement, Terra BDC incurred deferred financing costs totaling $0.3 million, to be amortized to interest expense over the term of the Term Loan. On August 31, 2021, Terra BDC made an initial draw on the Term Loan of $5.0 million and incurred an upfront fee of $0.6 million, which was deducted from proceeds from borrowings under the Term Loan. The discount is amortized to interest expense over the term of the Term Loan. During 2022, Terra BDC drew down an additional $20.0 million on the Term loan. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the amount outstanding under the Term Loan was $25.0 million and $5.0 million, respectively.
Terra BDC could prepay any Loan, in whole or in part, together with all accrued but unpaid interest thereon, upon at least 30 but not more than 60 days’ prior notice to the Agent. If Terra BDC elected to make such prepayments prior to October 9, 2023, Terra BDC would also be required to pay a make whole premium, being the present value at such date of (1) the principal amount being prepaid of such Loan, plus (2) all remaining required interest payments due on the principal amount being prepaid of such Loan through the maturity date (excluding accrued but unpaid interest to the date on which the make whole premium becomes owed), computed using a discount rate equal to the applicable U.S. Treasury rate (as set forth in the Credit Agreement) plus 50 basis points, over (B) the principal amount being prepaid of such Loan; provided that the make whole premium may in no event be less than zero.
In connection with its entry into the Credit Agreement, Terra BDC also entered into a security agreement (the “Security Agreement”), by and among Terra BDC, as grantor, and Eagle Point, as administrative agent, for the benefit of the Lenders, their affiliates and Eagle Point as the secured parties thereunder. Pursuant to the Security Agreement, Terra BDC pledged substantially all of its now owned and hereafter acquired property as security for the obligations of Terra BDC under the Credit Agreement, subject to certain limitations and restrictions set forth in the Security Agreements.
F-33


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The Credit Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, reporting requirements, borrowing conditions and affirmative, negative and financial covenants, including REIT status requirements and minimum asset coverage ratio requirements. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company was in compliance with these covenants. The Credit Agreement also includes usual and customary events of default and remedies for credit agreements of this nature. Events of default under the Credit Agreement include, but are not limited to: (i) the failure by Terra BDC to make any payments when due under the Credit Agreement; (ii) the failure of Terra BDC to perform or observe any term, covenant or agreement under the Credit Agreement or any other loan document, subject to applicable cure periods; (iii) an event of default on other material indebtedness of Terra BDC; (iv) the bankruptcy or insolvency of Terra BDC; and (v) judgments and attachments, with customary limits and grace periods, against Terra BDC or its property. In addition, the Loans are subject to mandatory prepayment, at the option of each Lender, upon a change in control of Terra BDC (as defined by the Credit Agreement).
On September 27, 2022, Terra BDC, Terra LLC and Eagle Point and the Lenders entered into a Consent Letter and Amendment (the “Credit Facility Amendment”) effective October 1, 2022. Pursuant to the Credit Facility Amendment, (i) Eagle Point and the Lenders consented to the consummation of the Merger and the assumption by Terra LLC of all of the obligations of Terra BDC under the Credit Agreement, (ii) and the Credit Agreement was amended to, among other things, change the scheduled maturity date to July 1, 2023, and remove the make whole premium on voluntary prepayments of the loans.
For the three months ended December 31, 2022, nine months ended September 30, 2022 and the year ended December 31, 2021, the components of interest expense were as follows:
Three Months Ended December 31, 2022Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022Year Ended December 31, 2021
Successor BasisPredecessor Basis
Stated interest expense$359,375 $909,454 $95,314 
Amortization of issue discount— 117,506 38,613 
Amortization of financing costs— 53,910 53,878 
Unused fee— 20,927 125,833 
Total interest expense$359,375 $1,101,797 $313,638 
Weighted average debt outstanding$22,300,000 $21,390,110 $567,766 
Cash paid for interest expense$359,375 $930,381 $110,938 
Stated interest rate5.625 %5.625 %5.625 %
Effective interest rate (1)
6.25 %6.25 %6.25 %
_______________
(1)The effective interest rate of the debt component is equal to the stated interest rate plus the amortization of issue discount.
Scheduled Debt Principal Payments
    Scheduled debt principal payments for each of the five calendar years following December 31, 2022 are as follows:
Years Ending December 31,Total
2023$25,000,000 
2024— 
2025— 
202638,375,000 
2027— 
Thereafter— 
63,375,000 
Unamortized discount and premium, net(4,332,096)
Total$59,042,904 
    
F-34


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies
Funding Commitments
In the ordinary course of business, the Company may enter into future funding commitments, which are subject to the borrower meeting certain performance-related metrics that are monitored by the Company. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company had $5.9 million and $14.9 million of unfunded commitments, respectively. The Company maintained sufficient cash on hand to fund such unfunded commitments, including matching these commitments with principal repayments on outstanding loans.
Other
The Company enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnification provisions. The Company’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown; however, the Company has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts. Management of Terra Income Advisors has reviewed the Company’s existing contracts and expects the risk of loss to the Company to be remote.
The Company is not currently subject to any material legal proceedings and, to the Company’s knowledge, no material legal proceedings are threatened against the Company. From time to time, the Company may be a party to certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings relating to the enforcement of the Company’s rights under contracts with its portfolio companies. While the outcome of any legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company does not expect that any such proceedings will have a material adverse effect upon its financial condition or results of operations.
See Note 5. “Related Party Transactions”, for a discussion of the Company’s commitments to Terra Income Advisors.
Note 8. Income Taxes
Terra BDC elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code commencing with its short taxable year beginning October 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2018. In order to qualify as a REIT, Terra BDC was required, among other things, to distribute dividends equal to at least 90% of its REIT net taxable income to the stockholders annually and meet certain tests regarding the nature of its income and assets. Because federal income tax regulations differ from U.S. GAAP, distributions in accordance with tax regulations may differ from net investment for financial reporting purposes. Differences may be permanent or temporary in nature. Permanent differences are reclassified among capital accounts in the consolidated financial statements to reflect their tax character. Differences in classification may also result from the treatment of short-term gains as ordinary income for tax purposes.
Taxable income generally differs from net increase in net assets resulting from operations for financial reporting purposes due to temporary and permanent differences in the recognition of income and expenses and generally excludes unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments as investment gains and losses are not included in taxable income until they are realized.
The following table reconciles net increase in net assets resulting from operations to taxable income:
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022Year Ended December 31, 2021
(Predecessor Basis)
Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations$(1,714,212)$4,086,245 
Net change in unrealized depreciation (appreciation) on investments3,444,211 (943,375)
Income tax expense605,787 534,784 
Other temporary differences (1)
(475,851)728,389 
(Reversal of incentive fees) incentive fees on capital gains(102,160)291,710 
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on obligations under participation agreements(42,128)67,533 
Total taxable income (2)
$1,715,647 $4,765,286 
_______________
(1)Other temporary differences primarily related to capitalization and amortization of transaction-related fees.
F-35


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(2)Amount for the year ended December 31, 2021 included $1.6 million of taxable income attributable to the TRS described below.
Taxable REIT Subsidiary
Terra BDC held certain portfolio company investments through consolidated taxable REIT subsidiaries, of which it is the parent. Such subsidiaries may be subject to U.S. federal and state corporate-level income taxes. These consolidated subsidiaries recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences between the tax basis of certain assets and liabilities and the reported amounts included in the accompanying consolidated statements of assets and liabilities using the applicable statutory tax rates in effect for the year in which any such temporary differences are expected to reverse. As of September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, Terra BDC had one TRS which Terra BDC formed to hold secured and unsecured credit facilities. In connection with the Merger on October 1, 2022, the TRS became a qualified REIT subsidiary of Terra LLC.
Income Tax Provision
The components of the Company's provision for income taxes were as follows:
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022Year Ended December 31, 2021
(Predecessor Basis)
Federal
Current$423,989 $326,287 
Deferred(16,057)41,511 
407,932 367,798 
State and Local
Current204,851 148,139 
Deferred(6,996)18,847 
197,855 166,986 
Total Provision for income taxes$605,787 $534,784 
A reconciliation of effective income tax for the period presented is as follows:
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022Year Ended December 31, 2021
(Predecessor Basis)
Pre-tax income attributable to taxable subsidiaries$2,147,385 $1,751,420 
Federal provision at statutory tax rate (21%)
$407,932 $367,798 
State and local taxes, net of deferred benefit197,855 166,986 
Total provision for income taxes$605,787 $534,784 
Effective income tax rate28.2 %30.5 %
F-36


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Deferred Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes consist of the following:
December 31, 2021
(Predecessor Basis)
Deferred Tax Assets
Deferred revenue$70,612 
Deferred Tax Liabilities
Unrealized gain on investment(130,970)
Net deferred tax liabilities$(60,358)
The Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are primarily the result of temporary differences related to the following:
deferred origination fee
fair value adjustment
The Company has not provided a valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset because the Company expects the deferred tax asset to be realized in future periods.
Income Taxes Paid
For the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and year ended December 31, 2021, the Company paid $0.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively, of income taxes. Deferred tax assets of $0.1 million were included in prepaid expenses and other assets in the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities as of September 30, 2022. Income tax payable of $0.4 million and deferred tax liabilities of $0.1 million, were included in other liabilities in the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2021. There were no income taxes payable as of December 31, 2022.
Source of Distribution
The following table reflects, for tax purposes, the estimated sources of the cash distributions that Terra BDC has paid on its common stock:
 Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2022
Year Ended
December 31, 2021
(Predecessor Basis)
Source of Distribution
Distribution
Amount
(1)(2)
%
Distribution
Amount
(1)
%
Net investment income$1,970,476 71.4 %$3,211,539 84.2 %
Return of capital789,506 28.6 %603,964 15.8 %
Distributions on a tax basis:$2,759,982 100.0 %$3,815,503 100.0 %
_______________
(1)The Distribution Amount and Percentage reflected are estimated figures. The actual source of distributions is calculated in connection with the filing of Terra BDC’s tax return.
(2)The TRS’s taxable income is not available for distribution to Terra BDC’s stockholders until the income is distributed up to the parent company. For the nine months ended September 30, 2022, all of the TRS’s taxable income were distributed to the parent company. For the year ended December 31, 2021, $1.6 million of taxable income attributable to the TRS were not distributed to the Company.
The Company makes certain adjustments to the classification of stockholders’ equity as a result of permanent book-to-tax differences, which include disallowed net operating loss carryforwards, amortization of deferred offering expenses and expense reimbursement from Adviser. To the extent these differences are permanent, they are charged or credited to capital in excess of par or accumulated net investment loss, as appropriate. For the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and year ended December 31, 2021, there were no permanent differences.
F-37


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
As of September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, Terra BDC did not have differences between amortized cost basis and tax basis cost of investments.
Note 9. Directors’ Fees
Terra BDC’s directors who did not serve in an executive officer capacity for Terra BDC or Terra Income Advisors were entitled to receive annual cash retainer fees, fees for attending board and committee meetings and annual fees for serving as a committee chairperson. These directors received an annual fee of $20,000, plus $2,500 for each board meeting attended in person, $1,000 for each board meeting attended via teleconference and $1,000 for each committee meeting attended. In addition, the chairman of the audit committee received an annual fee of $7,500 and the chairman of each of the nominating and corporate governance and the valuation committees, and any other committee, received an annual fee of $2,500 for their additional services. In connection with the Merger on October 1, 2022, Terra BDC’s directors were elected to the Terra REIT Board to fill the vacancies created by the Merger and Terra REIT will pay the fees to directors directly. For the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and the year ended December 31, 2021, Terra BDC recorded $84,378 and $120,622 of directors’ fees expense, respectively.
Terra BDC also reimbursed each of the above directors for all reasonable and authorized business expenses in accordance with Terra BDC policies as in effect from time to time, including reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending each board meeting and each committee meeting not held concurrently with a board meeting.
Terra BDC did not pay compensation to the directors who also served in an executive officer capacity for Terra BDC or Terra Income Advisors.
Note 10. Capital
As of December 31, 2022, all of the limited liability company interest in Terra LLC was held by Terra REIT.
Share Repurchase Program
    Terra BDC implemented a share repurchase program whereby every quarter Terra BDC offered to repurchase up to 2.5% of the weighed-average number of shares outstanding in the prior calendar year at a price per share equal to the most recently disclosed NAV per share of its common stock immediately prior to the date of repurchase. The purpose of the share repurchase program was to provide stockholders with liquidity, because there was otherwise no public market for Terra BDC’s common stock. The Terra BDC Board was permitted to amend, suspend or terminate the share repurchase program upon 30 days’ notice. On March 25, 2020, the Terra BDC Board unanimously approved the suspension of the operation of the share repurchase program, effective as of April 30, 2020. On May 11, 2021, the Terra BDC Board unanimously approved the resumption of the share repurchase program effective as of June 30, 2021. On March 30, 2022, the Terra BDC Board unanimously approved the suspension of the operation of the share repurchase program, effective as of April 30, 2022.
The following table provides information with respect to the repurchases of Terra BDC’s common stock for the year ended December 31, 2021. There were no shares repurchased for the nine months ended September 30, 2022.
PeriodTotal Number of Shares RepurchasedAverage Price Paid per ShareMaximum Number of Shares Allowed to be Repurchased
Year Ended December 31, 2021:
Three Months Ended March 31, 2021— — — 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2021682 $9.07 — 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2021 (1)(2)
209,978 $9.03 207,656 
Three Months Ended December 31, 2021 (3)(4)
208,904 $9.00 207,656 
_______________
(1)A total of 846,743 shares were validly tendered and not withdrawn, an amount that exceeded the maximum number of shares Terra BDC offered to purchase. In accordance with the terms of the tender offer, Terra BDC purchased on a pro rata basis a total of 207,646 shares validly tendered and not withdrawn. Approximately 24.5% of the number of shares tendered by each stockholder who participated in the tender offer was repurchased by Terra BDC.
(2)Subsequent to the close of the tender offer, Terra BDC discovered an administrative error in which a tender request was not processed. Terra BDC honored the tender request in October and accordingly another 2,332 shares were repurchased.
F-38


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(3)A total of 653,098 shares were validly tendered and not withdrawn, an amount that exceeded the maximum number of shares Terra BDC offered to purchase. In accordance with the terms of the tender offer, Terra BDC purchased on a pro rata basis a total of 207,652 shares validly tendered and not withdrawn. Approximately 31.8% of the number of shares tendered by each stockholder who participated in the tender offer was repurchased by us.
(4)Subsequent to the close of the tender offer, Terra BDC discovered an administrative error in which two tender requests were not processed. Terra BDC honored the tender requests in January 2022 and accordingly another 1,252 shares were repurchased.

Note 11. Net Increase in Net Assets
Income per share is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Other potentially dilutive shares, and the related impact to earnings, are considered when calculating earnings per share on a diluted basis. As of September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, there were no dilutive shares.
The following information sets forth the computation of the weighted average net increase in net assets per share from operations:
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022Year Ended December 31, 2021
Basic(Predecessor Basis)
Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations$(1,714,212)$4,086,245 
Weighted average common shares outstanding8,110,351 8,389,604 
Net (decrease) increase in net assets per share resulting from operations$(0.21)$0.49 
Note 12. Distributions
Distributions from net investment income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax regulations, which differ from U.S. GAAP.
Subsequent to the Merger on October 1, 2022, Terra LLC has not made a distribution to Terra REIT. The following table reflects Terra BDC’s distributions for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and the year ended December 31, 2021:
Record DatePayment DatePer Share
Per Day
Distributions
Paid in Cash
Distributions
Paid through
the DRIP
Total
Distributions
Paid/Accrued
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022
January 26, 2022January 31, 2022$0.001247 $238,677 $73,512 $312,189 
February 23, 2022February 28, 20220.001247 216,361 65,899 282,260 
March 28, 2022March 31, 20220.001247 240,331 72,452 312,783 
April 27, 2022April 30, 20220.001247 233,306 69,693 302,999 
May 26, 2022May 29, 20220.001247 240,446 72,948 313,394 
June 25, 2022June 30, 20220.001247 232,797 70,783 303,580 
July 26, 2022July 30, 20220.001247241,188 72,811 313,999 
August 26, 2022August 31, 20220.001247241,462 72,842 314,304 
September 27, 2022September 30, 20220.001247233,783 70,691 304,474 
   $2,118,351 $641,631 $2,759,982 
F-39


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Record DatePayment DatePer Share
Per Day
Distributions
Paid in Cash
Distributions
Paid through
the DRIP
Total
Distributions
Paid/Accrued
Year Ended December 31, 2021
January 28, 2021January 31, 2021$0.001239 $241,041 $81,397 $322,438 
February 25, 2021February 28, 20210.001239 219,664 73,721 293,385 
March 26, 2021March 31, 20210.001247 244,162 80,961 325,123 
April 27, 2021April 30, 20210.001247 237,113 77,707 314,820 
May 26, 2021May 29, 20210.001247 245,704 80,070 325,774 
June 25, 2021June 30, 20210.001247 238,662 76,745 315,407 
July 27, 2021July 30, 20210.001247 247,172 79,458 326,630 
August 26, 2021August 31, 20210.001247 248,285 78,498 326,783 
September 27, 2021September 30, 20210.001247 243,889 72,677 316,566 
October 26, 2021October 30, 20210.001247 244,311 75,001 319,312 
November 24, 2021November 30, 20210.001247 236,742 72,577 309,319 
December 28, 2021December 31, 20210.001247 246,134 73,812 319,946 
   $2,892,879 $922,624 $3,815,503 

Note 13. Financial Highlights
The following is a schedule of financial highlights for Terra BDC:
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022Year Ended December 31, 2021
(Predecessor Basis)
Per share data:
Net asset value at beginning of period$9.11 $9.07 
Results of operations (1):
Net investment income0.20 0.31 
Net change in unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on investments(0.43)0.12 
Net realized gain on investments0.01 0.07 
Net change in unrealized depreciation (appreciation) on obligations under
   participation agreements
0.01 (0.01)
Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations(0.21)0.49 
Stockholder distributions (2):
Distributions from return of capital(0.10)(0.07)
Distributions from net investment income(0.24)(0.38)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from stockholder distributions(0.34)(0.45)
Net asset value, end of period$8.56 $9.11 
Shares outstanding at end of period8,149,311 8,078,627 
    Total return (3)
(2.51)%5.59 %
Ratio/Supplemental data:
Net assets, end of period$69,754,081 $73,586,644 
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (4)
3.63 %3.49 %
Ratio of operating expenses to average net assets (4)(5)(6)
17.90 %14.66 %
Portfolio turnover35.68 %123.91 %
_______________
(1)The per share data was derived by using the weighted average shares outstanding during the applicable period.
F-40



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(2)The per share data for distributions reflects the actual amount of distributions declared per share during the applicable period.
(3)Total return is calculated assuming a purchase of shares of common stock at the current net asset value on the first day and a sale at the current net asset value on the last day of the periods reported. Distributions, if any, are assumed for purposes of this calculation to be reinvested at prices obtained under the DRIP. The total return does not consider the effect of any selling commissions or charges that may have been incurred in connection with the sale of shares of our common stock.
(4)These ratios are calculated using annualized net investment income and operating expenses.
(5)Excluding the (reversal on incentive fees) incentive fees on capital gains and transaction costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and year ended December 31, 2021, the ratio of operating expenses to average net assets was 16.0% and 14.3%, respectively.
(6)Excluding accrued incentive fees on capital gains, transaction costs and interest expense on debt, the ratio of operating expenses to average net assets was 8.98% and 8.3%, during the applicable period, respectively.
Note 13. Subsequent Events
The management of the Company has evaluated events and transactions through the date the consolidated financial statements were issued and has determined that there are no material events other than the one below that would require adjustment to or disclosure in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
On January 20, 2023, the Terra REIT Board adopted a distribution reinvestment plan, pursuant to which Terra REIT’s stockholders may elect to reinvest cash distributions payable by Terra REIT in additional shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, at the price per share determined pursuant to the Plan.
F-41



Terra Income Fund 6, LLC
Schedule IV – Mortgage Loans on Real Estate (Successor Basis)
As of December 31, 2022
Portfolio Company (1)
Collateral LocationProperty TypeInterest Payment Rates
Maximum Maturity Date (2)
Periodic Payment TermsPrior LiensFace AmountCarrying Amount
Mezzanine loans:
Dwight Mezz II, LLCUS - CAStudent
   housing
11.0 %5/6/2027Interest Only— $3,000,000 $2,916,369 
Havemeyer TSM LLC (3)(5)
US - NYMixed-use15.0 %6/1/2023Interest Only— 3,282,208 3,315,030 
6,282,208 6,231,399 
Preferred equity investments:
RS JZ Driggs, LLC (4)(5)(6)
US - NYMultifamily12.25 %7/1/2021Interest Only— 2,499,671 2,499,671 
370 Lex Part Deux, LLC (4)(5)(7)
US - NYOffice
LIBOR + 8.25% (2.44% Floor)
7/9/2022Interest Only— 23,655,377 23,655,377 
Ann Street JV LLCUS - GAMultifamily14.0 %6/7/2026Interest Only— 15,217,540 15,548,446 
Asano Bankers Hill, LLCUS - CAMixed-use
SOFR + 15.00% (0.25% /floor)
7/31/2025Interest Only— 17,450,623 17,817,825 
58,823,211 59,521,319 
First mortgages:
American Gilsonite CompanyUS - UTInfrastructure14.0 %8/31/2024Interest Only— 21,250,000 21,705,029 
Hillsborough Owners LLCUS - NCMixed-use
LIBOR +8.00% (0.25% Floor)
11/1/2024Interest Only— 20,720,028 21,094,981 
— 41,970,028 42,800,010 
Credit facility:
William A. Shopoff & Cindy I.
   Shopoff (4)(5)(8)
US - CAIndustrial15.0 %4/4/2023Interest Only— 16,664,376 16,797,348 
16,664,376 16,797,348 
Allowance for loan losses— (3,937,050)
$123,739,823 $121,413,026 
___________________________
(1)All of the Company’s loans have a prepayment penalty provision.
(2)Maximum maturity date assumes all extension options are exercised.
(3)Participation interest is with Mavik Real Estate Special Opportunities Fund REIT, LLC, a related-party real estate investment trust managed by an affiliate of the REIT Manager.
(4)Participation interest is with Terra REIT, the Company’s parent, managed by the REIT Manager.
(5)The Company acquired these investments through participation agreements. See “Participation Agreements” in Note 5 in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-42



(6)This investment is currently in maturity default. The Company initiated a litigation to seek full repayment of the loan from the sponsor. For the three months ended December 31, 2022 and nine months ended September 30, 2022, the Company suspended interest income accrual of $0.1 million and $0.9 million on this loan, respectively, because recovery of such income was doubtful.
(7)This investment is currently in maturity default. The Company initiated a litigation to seek full repayment of the loan from the sponsor. For the three months ended December 31, 2022 and nine months ended September 30, 2022, the Company suspended interest income accrual of $0.7 million and $0.5 million on this loan, respectively, because recovery of such income was doubtful. As of December 31, 2022, the Company recorded a specific allowance for loan losses of $3.9 million on this loan due to a decline in the fair value of the collateral.
(8)As of December 31, 2022, the facility was fully funded.

F-43



Terra Income Fund 6, LLC
Notes to Schedule IV - Mortgage Loans on Real Estate (Successor Basis)
December 31, 2022

Reconciliation of Mortgage Loans
on Real Estate
For the Period from October 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022
Balance, beginning of period$113,050,141 
Additions during the period:
Purchase premium1,305,697 
New mortgage loans7,697,768 
Amortization of purchase premium3,225,285 
Accrual, payment and accretion of investment-related fees and other, net71,800 
Collections of principal(615)
Provision for loan losses(3,937,050)
Balance, end of period$121,413,026 
F-44


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: March 10, 2023
 
 TERRA INCOME FUND 6, LLC
By: Terra Property Trust, Inc., its sole member
By:/s/ Vikram S. Uppal
 Vikram S. Uppal
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
   and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ Gregory M. Pinkus
Gregory M. Pinkus
Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


40