Terreno Realty Corp - Quarter Report: 2011 March (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-34603
Terreno Realty Corporation
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Maryland | 27-1262675 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
16 Maiden Lane, Fifth Floor San Francisco, CA (Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
94108 (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (415) 655-4580
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer þ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The registrant had 9,290,960 shares of its common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding as
of May 5, 2011.
Terreno Realty Corporation
Table of Contents
1
Table of Contents
Terreno Realty Corporation
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Investments in real estate |
||||||||
Land |
$ | 75,069 | $ | 71,861 | ||||
Buildings and improvements |
59,697 | 56,222 | ||||||
Intangible assets |
8,489 | 8,280 | ||||||
Total investments in properties |
143,255 | 136,363 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(2,635 | ) | (1,502 | ) | ||||
Net investments in properties |
140,620 | 134,861 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
47,947 | 57,253 | ||||||
Deferred financing costs, net |
709 | 796 | ||||||
Other assets, net |
4,395 | 1,472 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 193,671 | $ | 194,382 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Credit facility |
$ | | $ | | ||||
Mortgage loans payable |
17,471 | 17,676 | ||||||
Security deposits |
879 | 899 | ||||||
Intangible liabilities |
801 | 883 | ||||||
Deferred underwriting fee payable |
7,000 | 7,000 | ||||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
3,132 | 2,425 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
29,283 | 28,883 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) |
||||||||
Equity |
||||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Preferred stock: $0.01 par value, 100,000,000
shares authorized, and no shares issued
and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock: $0.01 par value, 400,000,000 shares
authorized, and 9,290,960 and 9,262,778 shares issued
and outstanding, respectively |
91 | 91 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
170,993 | 170,798 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(6,696 | ) | (5,390 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
164,388 | 165,499 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 193,671 | $ | 194,382 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
Terreno Realty Corporation
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
Period from | ||||||||
February 16, 2010 | ||||||||
For the Three | (Commencement of | |||||||
Months Ended | Operations) to | |||||||
March 31, 2011 | March 31, 2010 | |||||||
REVENUES |
||||||||
Rental revenues |
$ | 3,370 | $ | 12 | ||||
Total revenues |
3,370 | 12 | ||||||
COSTS AND EXPENSES |
||||||||
Property operating expenses |
1,463 | 6 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
959 | 15 | ||||||
General and administrative |
1,608 | 620 | ||||||
Acquisition costs |
282 | 130 | ||||||
Total costs and expenses |
4,312 | 771 | ||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) |
||||||||
Interest and other income |
4 | 5 | ||||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
(368 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||
Total other income and expenses |
(364 | ) | 2 | |||||
Net loss available to common stockholders |
$ | (1,306 | ) | $ | (757 | ) | ||
Basic and Diluted net loss available to common stockholders per share |
$ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.08 | ) | ||
Basic and Diluted Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding |
9,132,766 | 9,112,000 | ||||||
Dividends Declared per Common Share |
$ | 0.10 | $ | | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
Terreno Realty Corporation
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity
(in thousands except share data)
(Unaudited)
Common Stock | Additional Paid- | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||
Number of Shares | Amount | in Capital | Deficit | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Balance as of February 16, 2010 (commencement of
operations) |
1,000 | $ | | $ | 1 | $ | | $ | 1 | |||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | (5,390 | ) | (5,390 | ) | |||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock |
9,112,000 | 91 | 182,149 | | 182,240 | |||||||||||||||
Equity issuance costs |
| | (12,135 | ) | | (12,135 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(1,000 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock, net |
150,778 | | | | | |||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation amortization |
| | 784 | | 784 | |||||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
9,262,778 | 91 | 170,798 | (5,390 | ) | 165,499 | ||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | (1,306 | ) | (1,306 | ) | |||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock, net |
28,182 | | | | | |||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation amortization |
| | 195 | | 195 | |||||||||||||||
Balance as of March 31, 2011 |
9,290,960 | $ | 91 | $ | 170,993 | $ | (6,696 | ) | $ | 164,388 | ||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
Terreno Realty Corporation
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Period from | ||||||||
February 16, 2010 | ||||||||
For the Three | (Commencement of | |||||||
Months Ended | Operations) to | |||||||
March 31, 2011 | March 31, 2010 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (1,306 | ) | $ | (757 | ) | ||
Adjustments to net loss |
||||||||
Straight-line rents |
(310 | ) | | |||||
Amortization of lease intangibles |
116 | 2 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
959 | 15 | ||||||
Deferred financing cost and mortgage premium amortization, net |
49 | 3 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
351 | 106 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||||||
Other assets |
(614 | ) | (280 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
280 | 320 | ||||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(475 | ) | (591 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Cash paid for property acquisitions |
(5,821 | ) | (12,690 | ) | ||||
Cash paid for deposits on property acquisitions |
(2,000 | ) | | |||||
Additions to buildings and improvements |
(842 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(8,663 | ) | (12,733 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs of $0 and $4,846, respectively |
| 177,088 | ||||||
Payments on mortgage loans payable |
(166 | ) | | |||||
Payment of financing fees |
(2 | ) | (432 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(168 | ) | 176,656 | |||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(9,306 | ) | 163,332 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
57,253 | 1 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 47,947 | $ | 163,333 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 284 | $ | | ||||
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash transactions |
||||||||
Deferred underwriting fee |
$ | | $ | 7,000 | ||||
Offering costs payable |
$ | 50 | $ | 289 | ||||
Contribution of fixed assets by Terreno Capital Partners LLC |
$ | | $ | 240 | ||||
Reconciliation of cash paid for property acquisitions |
||||||||
Acquisition of properties |
$ | 5,800 | $ | 12,814 | ||||
Assumption of other assets and liabilities |
21 | (124 | ) | |||||
Net cash paid for property acquisitions |
$ | 5,821 | $ | 12,690 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
Terreno Realty Corporation
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization
Terreno Realty Corporation (Terreno, and together with its subsidiaries, the Company) is
an internally managed Maryland corporation focused on acquiring, owning and operating industrial
real estate located in six major coastal U.S. markets: Los Angeles Area; Northern New Jersey/New
York City; San Francisco Bay Area; Seattle Area; Miami Area; and Washington, D.C./Baltimore. As of
March 31, 2011, the Company owned 34 buildings aggregating approximately 2.5 million square feet.
The Company commenced operations upon completion of an initial public offering (IPO) of
8,750,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $20.00 per share and a concurrent private
placement of 350,000 shares of common stock at a price of $20.00 per share on February 16, 2010.
The net proceeds of the IPO and the concurrent private placement were approximately $169.8 million.
Prior to the completion of its IPO, the Company had no assets other than cash. The Company
intends to elect to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (REIT) under Sections 856 through
860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), commencing with its taxable year
ended December 31, 2010.
Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation. The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements
of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions
to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and disclosures required by GAAP for annual financial statements. In managements
opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair
presentation have been included. The interim condensed consolidated financial statements include
all of the Company and its subsidiaries and all intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements contained in the Companys 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K and the notes
thereto, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements
in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications. Certain items in the condensed consolidated financial statements for prior
periods have been reclassified to conform to current classifications.
Investments in Real Estate. Investments in real estate are stated at cost, less accumulated
depreciation, unless circumstances indicate that the cost cannot be recovered, in which case, an
adjustment to the carrying value of the property is made to reduce it to its estimated fair value.
The Company also reviews the impact of above and below market leases, in-place leases and lease
origination costs for acquisitions and records an intangible asset or liability accordingly.
Impairment. Carrying values for financial reporting purposes will be reviewed for impairment
on a property-by-property basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value of a property may not be fully recoverable. The intended use of an asset either
held for sale or held for the long term, can significantly impact how impairment is measured. If
an asset is intended to be held for the long term, the impairment analysis will be based on a
two-step test. The first test measures estimated expected future cash flows over the holding
period, including a residual value (undiscounted and without interest charges), against the
carrying value of the property. If the asset fails the test, then the asset
carrying value will be measured against the lower of cost or the present value of expected
cash flows over the expected hold period. An impairment charge to earnings will be recognized for
the excess of the assets carrying value over the lower of cost or the present values of expected
cash flows over the expected hold period. If an asset is intended to be sold, impairment will be
determined using the estimated fair value less costs to sell. The estimation of expected future
net cash flows is inherently uncertain and relies on assumptions, among other things, regarding
current and future economic and market conditions and the availability of capital. The Company
determines the estimated fair values based on its assumptions regarding rental rates, lease-up and
holding periods, as well as sales prices. When available, current market information is
6
Table of Contents
used to determine capitalization and rental growth rates. If available, current comparative
sales values may also be used to establish fair value. When market information is not readily
available, the inputs are based on the Companys understanding of market conditions and the
experience of the Companys management team. Actual results could differ significantly from the
Companys estimates. The discount rates used in the fair value estimates will represent a rate
commensurate with the indicated holding period with a premium layered on for risk. There were no
impairments as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
Property Acquisitions. Upon acquisition of a property, the Company estimates the fair value
of acquired tangible assets (consisting of land, buildings and improvements) and intangible assets
and liabilities (consisting of the above and below market leases and the origination value of all
in-place leases). The Company determines fair values using estimated cash flow projections and
other valuation techniques and applying appropriate discount and capitalization rates based on
available market information.
The fair value of the tangible assets is based on the value of the property as if it were vacant,
and the as-if-vacant value is then allocated to land and buildings and improvements. Land values
are derived from current comparative sales values, when available, or managements estimates of the
fair value based on market conditions and the experience of the Companys management team.
Building values are calculated as replacement cost less depreciation, or managements estimates of
the fair value of these assets using discounted cash flows analyses or similar methods. The fair
value of the above and below market leases is based on the present value of the difference between
the contractual amounts to be received pursuant to the acquired leases (using a discount rate that
reflects the risks associated with the acquired leases) and the Companys estimate of the market
lease rates measured over a period equal to the remaining noncancelable term of the leases. The
capitalized values of above market leases and below market leases are amortized to rental revenue
over the remaining noncancelable term of the respective leases. The origination value of in-place
leases is based on costs to execute similar leases including commissions and other related costs.
The origination value of in-place leases also includes real estate taxes, insurance and an estimate
of lost rent revenue at market rates during the estimated time required to lease up the property
from vacant to the occupancy level at the date of acquisition. As of March 31, 2011, the Company
has recorded gross intangible assets and liabilities in the amounts of $2.2 million, $0.9 million,
and $6.3 million for the value attributable to above market leases, below market leases and
in-place leases, respectively. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had recorded gross intangible
assets and liabilities in the amounts of $2.2 million, $0.9 million, and $6.1 million for the value
attributable to above market leases, below market leases and in-place leases, respectively. These
amounts are included in intangible assets and liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheets. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company has recorded net accumulated
amortization of approximately $1.8 million and $1.1 million, respectively, related to these
intangible assets and liabilities.
In connection with property acquisitions, the Company may acquire leases with rental rates above or
below the market rental rates. Such differences are recorded as an intangible lease asset (above
market leases) or liability (below market leases), pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) 805, Business Combinations, and amortized to rental revenues over the remaining life of the
related leases. The total net impact to rental revenues due to the amortization of above and below
market leases, was a decrease of approximately $116,000 and $2,000, respectively, for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and for the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations)
to March 31, 2010.
Depreciation and Useful Lives of Real Estate and Intangible Assets. Depreciation and
amortization are computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related
assets or liabilities. The following table reflects the standard depreciable lives typically used
to compute depreciation and amortization. However, such depreciable lives may be different based on
the estimated useful life of such assets or liabilities.
Description | Standard Depreciable Life | |
Land
|
Not depreciated | |
Building
|
40 years | |
Building Improvements
|
5-40 years | |
Tenant Improvements
|
Shorter of lease term or useful life | |
Leasing Costs
|
Lease term | |
In-place leases
|
Lease term | |
Above/Below Market Leases
|
Lease term |
7
Table of Contents
Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents is comprised of cash held in a
major banking institution and other highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities
of three months or less. Cash equivalents are generally invested in U.S. government securities,
government agency securities or money market accounts.
Revenue Recognition. The Company records rental revenue from operating leases on a
straight-line basis over the term of the non-cancellable leases and maintains an allowance for
estimated losses that may result from the inability of its tenants to make required payments. If
tenants fail to make contractual lease payments that are greater than the Companys allowance for
doubtful accounts, security deposits and letters of credit, then the Company may have to recognize
additional doubtful account charges in future periods. The Company monitors the liquidity and
creditworthiness of its tenants on an on-going basis by reviewing their financial condition
periodically as appropriate. Each period the Company reviews its outstanding accounts receivable,
including straight-line rents, for doubtful accounts and provides allowances as needed. As of March
31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there was no allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company also
records lease termination fees when a tenant has executed a definitive termination agreement with
the Company and the payment of the termination fee is not subject to any conditions that must be
met or waived before the fee is due to the Company. If a tenant remains in the leased space
following the execution of a definitive termination agreement, the applicable termination will be
deferred and recognized over the term of such tenants occupancy.
Tenant expense reimbursement income includes payments and amounts due from tenants pursuant to
their leases for real estate taxes, insurance and other recoverable property operating expenses and
is recognized as rental revenues during the same period the related expenses are incurred. Tenant
expense reimbursement income recognized as rental revenues for the three months ended March 31,
2011 and for the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to March 31, 2010 was
$787,000 and $3,000, respectively.
Deferred Financing Costs. Costs incurred in connection with financings are capitalized and
amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the term of the related
loan. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, deferred financing costs were $0.7 million and
$0.8 million, respectively, net of accumulated amortization.
Mortgage Premiums. Mortgage premiums represent the excess of the fair value of debt over the
principal value of debt assumed in connection with property acquisitions. The mortgage premiums
are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt instrument using the
effective interest method. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the net unamortized mortgage
premiums were $0.6 million and $0.7 million, respectively, and were included as a component of
mortgage loans payable on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Income Taxes. The Company intends to elect to be taxed as a REIT under the Code and operates
as such beginning with its taxable year ended December 31, 2010. To qualify as a REIT, the Company
must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to
distribute at least 90% of its annual REIT taxable income to its stockholders (which is computed
without regard to the dividends paid deduction or net capital gain and which does not necessarily
equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP). As a REIT, the Company generally will not
be subject to federal income tax to the extent it distributes qualifying dividends to its
stockholders. If it fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to federal
income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates and generally will not be
permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for the four taxable
years following the year during which qualification is lost unless the IRS grants it relief under
certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect the Companys net
income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, the Company believes it
is organized and operates in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT.
ASC 740-10, Income Taxes, provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized,
measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. ASC 740-10 requires the evaluation
of tax positions taken in the course of preparing the Companys tax returns to determine whether
the tax positions are more-likely-than-not of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax benefits of
positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are recorded as a tax expense in
the current year. On February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations), the Company adopted the
provisions of ASC 740-10 with no material effect on either its financial condition or results of
operations. As of March 31, 2011, the Company did not have any unrecognized tax benefits and does
not believe that there will be any material changes in unrecognized tax positions over the next 12
months.
Stock-Based Compensation and Other Long-Term Incentive Compensation. The Company follows the
provisions of ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, to account for its stock-based compensation
plan, which requires that the compensation cost relating to stock-based payment transactions be
recognized in the financial statements and that the cost be
8
Table of Contents
measured on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. The Company has
adopted the 2010 Equity Plan, which provides for the grant of restricted stock awards, performance
share awards, unrestricted shares or any combination of the foregoing. Stock-based compensation is
recognized as a general and administrative expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of operations and measured at the fair value of the award on the date of grant. The
Company estimates the forfeiture rate based on historical experience as well as expected behavior.
The amount of the expense may be subject to adjustment in future periods depending on the specific
characteristics of the stock-based award.
In addition, the Company has awarded long-term incentive target awards to its executives that may
be payable in shares of the Companys common stock after the conclusion of each pre-established
performance measurement period. The amount that may be earned under the long-term incentive plan
is variable depending on the relative total shareholder performance of the Companys stock as
compared to the total shareholder return of the MSCI U.S. REIT Index and the FTSE NAREIT Equity
Industrial Index over the pre-established performance measurement period. The Company estimates
the fair value of the long-term incentive target awards using a Monte Carlo simulation model on the
date of grant. These awards are recognized as compensation expense over the requisite period based
on the fair value of the award at the balance sheet date.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments. ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,
defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820
also provides guidance for using fair value to measure financial assets and liabilities. ASC 820
requires disclosure of the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value
measurements fall, including measurements using quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities (Level 1), quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted
prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active (Level 2), and
significant valuation assumptions that are not readily observable in the market (Level 3).
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts
payable and deferred underwriting fee payable approximated their carrying values because of the
short-term nature of these investments or liabilities. Based on borrowing rates available to the
Company at March 31, 2011, the estimated fair value of the mortgage loans payable were
approximately $16.8 million.
Note 3. Concentration of Credit Risk.
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company
to a significant concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. The
Company may maintain deposits in federally insured financial institutions in excess of federally
insured limits. However, the Companys management believes the Company is not exposed to
significant credit risk due to the financial position of the depository institutions in which those
deposits are held.
Other real estate companies compete with the Company in its real estate markets. This results in
competition for tenants to occupy space. The existence of competing properties could have a
material impact on the Companys ability to lease space and on the level of rent that can be
achieved. The Companys top five tenants as of March 31, 2011 are as follows:
% of Total | Annualized | % of Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Rentable | Base Rent | Annualized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tenant | Leases | Square Feet | Square Feet | (000s)1 | Base Rent | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | Home Depot |
1 | 413,092 | 16.6 | % | $ | 1,874 | 17.3 | % | |||||||||||||||
2 | Precision Custom Coating |
1 | 208,000 | 8.4 | % | 1,606 | 14.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
3 | YRC, Inc. |
1 | 121,551 | 4.9 | % | 1,244 | 11.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
4 | International Paper Company |
1 | 137,872 | 5.5 | % | 680 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
5 | Somerset Motors Partnership |
2 | 62,400 | 2.5 | % | 452 | 4.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
6 | 942,915 | 37.9 | % | $ | 5,856 | 54.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1 | Annualized base rent is calculated as monthly base rent per the leases, excluding any partial or full rent abatements, as of March 31, 2011, multiplied by 12. |
Note 4. Investments in Real Estate.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company
acquired one industrial building containing approximately 135,000 square feet. The total aggregate
initial investment was approximately $5.8 million. The property was acquired from an unrelated
third party using existing cash on hand and was accounted for as an asset acquisition.
Note 5. Debt.
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had an $80.0 million senior
revolving credit facility that matures on March 22, 2013 (the Facility). The amount available
under the Facility may be increased up to
9
Table of Contents
$150.0 million, subject to certain conditions and the identification of lenders willing to make
available additional amounts. Interest on the Facility will generally be paid based upon, at the
Companys option, either (i) LIBOR plus the applicable LIBOR margin or (ii) the applicable base
rate which is the greater of the administrative agents prime rate plus 1.00%, 0.50% above the
federal funds effective rate, or thirty-day LIBOR plus the applicable LIBOR margin for LIBOR rate
loans under the Facility. The applicable LIBOR margin will range from 3.00% to 4.25%, depending on
the ratio of the Companys outstanding consolidated indebtedness to the value of the Companys
consolidated gross asset value. The Facility requires payment of an annual unused facility fee in
an amount equal to 0.35% to 0.50% depending on the unused portion of the Facility. The unused
facility fee was $100,000 and $0, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and for
the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to March 31, 2010. The Facility
includes a series of financial and other covenants that the Company must comply with in order to
borrow under the Facility. The Company has agreed to guarantee the obligations of the borrower (a
wholly-owned subsidiary) under the Facility. As of March 31, 2011, there were no borrowings
outstanding under the Facility and five properties were in the borrowing base. The Company was in
compliance with its financial covenants at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
The mortgage loans payable are collateralized by certain of the properties and require monthly
interest and principal payments until maturity and are generally non-recourse. The mortgage loans
bear interest at a weighted average fixed annual interest rate of 5.18% and mature between 2015 and
2017.
The scheduled principal payments of the Companys mortgage loans payable as of March 31, 2011 were
as follows (dollars in thousands):
2011 (9 months) |
$ | 512 | ||
2012 |
718 | |||
2013 |
761 | |||
2014 |
806 | |||
2015 |
13,642 | |||
Thereafter |
397 | |||
Subtotal |
16,836 | |||
Unamortized net premiums |
635 | |||
Total |
$ | 17,471 | ||
Note 6. Stockholders Equity.
The Companys authorized capital stock consists of 400,000,000
shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, and 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01
par value per share. As of March 31, 2011, 9,290,960 shares of common stock were issued and
outstanding, including 134,958 non-vested restricted stock awards, and no shares of preferred stock
were issued and outstanding.
In connection with the completion of the IPO on February 16, 2010, the Company issued 12,000 shares
of common stock to Terreno Capital Partners LLC, an entity owned by the Companys executive
officers, in exchange for the contribution of fixed assets to the Company with a net book value of
$240,000. These shares were subsequently distributed to such executive officers.
As of March 31, 2011, there were 455,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance as
restricted stock grants, unrestricted stock awards or performance shares under the Companys 2010
Equity Incentive Plan, of which 276,040 were remaining. The grant date fair value per share of
restricted stock awards issued during the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of
operations) to March 31, 2011 ranged from $17.82 to $20.00. The grant date fair value of the
restricted stock was determined using the initial public offering price of $20.00 for grants issued
on February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) and for all grants issued after the commencement
of operations, the Company uses the closing price of the Companys stock on the date of grant. The
fair value of the shares that were granted during the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $0.5
million and the vesting period for the restricted shares is five years. As of March 31, 2011, the
Company had approximately $2.6 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to
restricted stock issuances, which is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted average
period of approximately 4.1 years. The following is a summary of the total restricted shares
granted to the Companys executive officers, employees and directors, with the related weighted
average grant date fair value share prices for the three months ended March 31, 2011.
10
Table of Contents
Restricted Stock Activity:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average Grant | ||||||||
Shares | Date Fair Value | |||||||
Nonvested shares outstanding at beginning of period |
150,778 | $ | 19.93 | |||||
Granted, net |
28,182 | 17.82 | ||||||
Vested |
(44,002 | ) | 19.98 | |||||
Nonvested shares outstanding at end of period |
134,958 | $ | 19.45 | |||||
The following is a vesting schedule of the total nonvested shares of restricted stock
outstanding as of March 31, 2011:
Nonvested Shares Vesting Schedule | Number of Shares | |||
2011 (9 months) |
870 | |||
2012 |
32,049 | |||
2013 |
32,049 | |||
2014 |
32,049 | |||
2015 |
32,049 | |||
Thereafter |
5,892 | |||
Total Nonvested Shares |
134,958 | |||
On February 17, 2011, the board of directors declared a cash dividend of $0.10 per share of
common stock payable on April 19, 2011 to stockholders of record on April 5, 2011.
Note 7. Net Loss Per Share.
Pursuant to ASC 260-10-45, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities, unvested share-based payment awards
that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends are participating securities and are included in
the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The two-class method of
computing earnings per share allocates earnings per share for common stock and any participating
securities according to dividends declared (whether paid or unpaid) and participation rights in
undistributed earnings. Under the two-class method, earnings per common share are computed by
dividing the sum of distributed earnings to common stockholders and undistributed earnings
allocated to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for
the period. Our nonvested restricted stock are considered participating securities since these
share-based awards contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends irrespective of whether the awards
ultimately vest or expire. The Company had no dilutive restricted stock awards outstanding for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and for the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of
operations) to March 31, 2010.
Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies
Deferred Underwriting Commissions. Underwriting commissions incurred in connection with the
Companys IPO are reflected as a reduction of additional paid in capital in the amount of $10.5
million. The underwriters deferred approximately $7.0 million of their underwriting commissions
until such time as the Company purchases assets in accordance with its investment strategy
described in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 with an
aggregate price (including the amount of any outstanding indebtedness assumed or incurred by the
Company) at least equal to the net proceeds from the IPO. The deferred underwriting commissions
and other unpaid offering costs are reflected in deferred underwriting fee payable. As of March
31, 2011, the Company had paid approximately $3.5 million in underwriting commissions.
Litigation. The Company is not involved in any material litigation nor, to its knowledge, is
any material litigation threatened against it. In the normal course of business, from time to
time, the Company may be involved in legal actions relating to the ownership and operations of its
properties. Management does not expect that the liabilities, if any, that may ultimately result
from such legal actions will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
Environmental Matters. The industrial properties that the Company owns and will acquire are subject
to various federal, state and local environmental laws. Under these laws, courts and government
agencies have the authority to require the Company, as owner of a contaminated property, to clean
up the property, even if it did not know of or was not responsible for the contamination. These
laws also apply to persons who owned a property at the time it became contaminated, and therefore
it is possible the Company could incur these costs even after the Company sells some of the
properties it acquires. In addition to the costs of cleanup, environmental contamination can affect
the value of a property and, therefore, an owners
11
Table of Contents
ability to borrow using the property as collateral or to sell the property. Under applicable
environmental laws, courts and government agencies also have the authority to require that a person
who sent waste to a waste disposal facility, such as a landfill or an incinerator, pay for the
clean-up of that facility if it becomes contaminated and threatens human health or the environment.
Furthermore, various court decisions have established that third parties may recover damages for
injury caused by property contamination. For instance, a person exposed to asbestos at one of our
properties may seek to recover damages if he or she suffers injury from the asbestos. Lastly, some
of these environmental laws restrict the use of a property or place conditions on various
activities. An example would be laws that require a business using chemicals to manage them
carefully and to notify local officials that the chemicals are being used.
The Company could be responsible for any of the costs discussed above. The costs to clean up a
contaminated property, to defend against a claim, or to comply with environmental laws could be
material and could adversely affect the funds available for distribution to our stockholders. The
Company generally obtains Phase I environmental site assessments, or ESAs, on each property prior
to acquiring it. However, these ESAs may not reveal all environmental costs that might have a
material adverse effect on the Companys business, assets, results of operations or liquidity and
may not identify all potential environmental liabilities.
The Company utilizes local third party property managers for day-to-day property management and
will rely on these third parties to operate its industrial properties in compliance with applicable
federal, state and local environmental laws in their daily operation of the respective properties
and to promptly notify the Company of any environmental contaminations or similar issues.
As a result, the Company may become subject to material environmental liabilities of which it is
unaware. The Company can make no assurances that (1) future laws or regulations will not impose
material environmental liabilities on it, or (2) the environmental condition of the Companys
industrial properties will not be affected by the condition of the properties in the vicinity of
its industrial properties (such as the presence of leaking underground storage tanks) or by third
parties unrelated to the Company.
General Uninsured Losses. The Company carries property and rental loss, liability and
terrorism insurance. The Company believes that the policy terms, conditions, limits and
deductibles are adequate and appropriate under the circumstances, given the relative risk of loss,
the cost of such coverage and current industry practice. In addition, the Companys properties are
located, or may in the future be located, in areas that are subject to earthquake and flood
activity. As a result, the Company has obtained or anticipates that it will obtain, as applicable,
limited earthquake and flood insurance on those properties. There are, however, certain types of
extraordinary losses, such as those due to acts of war, that may be either uninsurable or not
economically insurable. Although the Company has obtained coverage for certain acts of terrorism,
with policy specifications and insured limits that it believes are commercially reasonable, there
can be no assurance that the Company will be able to collect under such policies. Should an
uninsured loss occur, the Company could lose its investment in, and anticipated profits and cash
flows from, a property.
Contractual Commitments. As of May 5, 2011, the Company had two outstanding contracts with
third-party sellers to acquire industrial properties. There is no assurance that the Company will
acquire the properties under contract because the proposed acquisitions are subject to a variety of
factors, including the satisfaction of customary closing conditions. The following table
summarizes certain information with respect to the properties the Company has under contract:
Purchase | ||||||||||||||||
Number of | Price | Assumed Debt | ||||||||||||||
Market | Buildings | Square Feet | (in thousands) | (in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Los Angeles Area |
1 | 27,500 | $ | 4,100 | $ | | ||||||||||
Miami Area |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Northern New Jersey/New York |
1 | 211,500 | 32,600 | 14,769 | ||||||||||||
San Francisco Bay Area |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Seattle Area |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Washington, D.C/Baltimore |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Total/Weighted Average |
2 | 239,000 | $ | 36,700 | $ | 14,769 | ||||||||||
12
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the Securities Act) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act). We caution investors that forward-looking statements are based on
managements beliefs and on assumptions made by, and information currently available to,
management. When used, the words anticipate, believe, estimate, expect, intend, may,
might, plan, project, result, should, will, seek, and similar expressions which do
not relate solely to historical matters are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These
statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions and are not guarantees of future
performance, which may be affected by known and unknown risks, trends, uncertainties, and factors
that are beyond our control. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or
should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those
anticipated, estimated, or projected. We expressly disclaim any responsibility to update our
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Accordingly, investors should use caution in relying on past forward-looking statements, which are
based on results and trends at the time they are made, to anticipate future results or trends.
Some of the risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results, performance, or
achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements
include, among others, the following:
| the factors included under the headings Risk Factors and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011 and in our other public filings; | ||
| our limited operating history; | ||
| our ability to identify and acquire industrial properties on terms favorable to us; | ||
| general volatility of the capital markets and the market price of our common stock; | ||
| adverse economic or real estate conditions or developments in the industrial real estate sector and/or in the markets in which we acquire properties; | ||
| our dependence on key personnel and our reliance on third parties to property manage our industrial properties; | ||
| general economic conditions; | ||
| our dependence upon tenants; | ||
| our inability to comply with the laws, rules and regulations applicable to companies, and in particular, public companies; | ||
| our inability to manage our growth effectively; | ||
| tenant bankruptcies and defaults on or non-renewal of leases by tenants; | ||
| decreased rental rates or increased vacancy rates; | ||
| increased interest rates and operating costs; | ||
| declining real estate valuations and impairment charges; | ||
| our expected leverage, our failure to obtain necessary outside financing, and future debt service obligations; | ||
| estimates related to our ability to make distributions to our stockholders; | ||
| our failure to successfully hedge against interest rate increases; |
13
Table of Contents
| our failure to successfully operate acquired properties; | ||
| our failure to qualify or maintain our status as a REIT and possible adverse changes to tax laws; | ||
| uninsured or underinsured losses relating to our properties; | ||
| environmental uncertainties and risks related to natural disasters; | ||
| financial market fluctuations; and | ||
| changes in real estate and zoning laws and increases in real property tax rates. |
Overview
Terreno Realty Corporation (Terreno, and together with its subsidiaries, we, us, our,
our Company, or the Company) is an internally managed Maryland corporation focused on
acquiring, owning and operating industrial real estate located in six major coastal U.S. markets:
Los Angeles Area; Northern New Jersey/New York City; San Francisco Bay Area; Seattle Area; Miami
Area; and Washington, D.C./Baltimore. We invest in several types of industrial real estate,
including warehouse/distribution, flex (including light industrial and R&D) and trans-shipment. We
target functional buildings in infill locations that may be shared by multiple tenants and that
cater to customer demand within the various submarkets in which we operate. Infill locations are
geographic locations surrounded by high concentrations of already developed land and existing
buildings. As of March 31, 2011, we owned a total of 34 buildings aggregating approximately 2.5
million square feet, which we purchased for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $140.1
million, including the assumption of mortgage loans payable of approximately $17.9 million, which
includes mortgage premiums of approximately $0.7 million. As of March 31, 2011, our properties
were 67.5% leased to 45 tenants. We intend to elect to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856
through 860 of the Code, commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2010.
The following table summarizes our investments in real estate as of March 31, 2011:
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% of Total | Occupancy | Annualized | % of Total | Remaining | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Rentable | Percentage as of | Base Rent | Annualized | Lease Term | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Market | Buildings | Square Feet | Square Feet | March 31, 2011 | (000s) 1 | Base Rent | (Years) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles Area |
2 | 121,551 | 4.9 | % | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,244 | 11.5 | % | 9.3 | |||||||||||||||||
Northern New Jersey/New York |
20 | 1,202,074 | 48.4 | % | 86.7 | % | 5,935 | 54.8 | % | 3.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco Bay Area |
8 | 398,024 | 16.0 | % | 75.3 | % | 2,575 | 23.8 | % | 2.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Seattle Area |
1 | 137,872 | 5.5 | % | 100.0 | % | 680 | 6.3 | % | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Miami Area |
2 | 491,243 | 19.8 | % | 3.5 | % | 133 | 1.2 | % | 2.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Washington, D.C./Baltimore |
1 | 135,000 | 5.4 | % | 44.4 | % | 270 | 2.4 | % | 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total/Weighted Average |
34 | 2,485,764 | 100.0 | % | 67.5 | % | $ | 10,837 | 100.0 | % | 3.7 | |||||||||||||||||
1 | Annualized base rent is calculated as monthly base rent per the leases, excluding any partial or full rent abatements, as of March 31, 2011, multiplied by 12. |
The following table summarizes the anticipated lease expirations for leases in place at March
31, 2011, without giving effect to the exercise of renewal options or termination rights, if any,
at or prior to scheduled expiration:
Annualized | % of Total | |||||||||||
Base Rent | Annualized | |||||||||||
Year | Square Feet 1 | (000s) 1, 2 | Base Rent 1 | |||||||||
2011 (9 months) |
46,566 | $ | 387 | 3.3 | % | |||||||
2012 |
382,664 | 2,687 | 23.3 | % | ||||||||
2013 |
535,806 | 2,847 | 24.6 | % | ||||||||
2014 |
293,087 | 2,132 | 18.5 | % | ||||||||
2015 |
73,014 | 433 | 3.7 | % | ||||||||
2016+ |
346,849 | 3,069 | 26.6 | % | ||||||||
Total |
1,677,986 | $ | 11,555 | 100.0 | % | |||||||
14
Table of Contents
1 | Includes leases that expire on or after March 31, 2011 and leases in month-to-month status totaling 19,247 square feet. | |
2 | Annualized base rent is calculated as monthly base rent per the leases at expiration, excluding any partial or full rent abatements, as of March 31, 2011, multiplied by 12. |
Recent Developments
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we acquired one industrial building containing
approximately 135,000 square feet. The total aggregate investment was approximately $5.8 million.
The property was acquired from an unrelated third party using existing cash on hand. The following
table sets forth the industrial property we acquired during the three months ended March 31, 2011:
Number of | Acquisition Cost | |||||||||||||||
Property Name | Location | Buildings | Square Feet | (in thousands) 1 | ||||||||||||
Dorsey |
Jessup, MD | 1 | 135,000 | $ | 5,800 |
1 | Excludes acquisition costs totaling approximately $0.3 million. |
On February 17, 2011, our board of directors declared a cash dividend in the amount of $0.10
per share of our common stock payable on April 19, 2011 to stockholders of record as of the close
of business on April 5, 2011.
As of May 5, 2011, we had two outstanding contracts with a third-party sellers to acquire
industrial properties as described under the heading Contractual Obligations in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q. There is no assurance that we will acquire the properties under contract
because the proposed acquisitions are subject to a variety of factors, including the satisfaction
of customary closing conditions.
Results of Operations
We commenced operations upon the completion of our initial public offering and the concurrent
private placement on February 16, 2010. We derive substantially all of our revenues from rents
received from tenants under existing leases on each of our properties. These revenues include
fixed base rents, recoveries of expenses that we have incurred and that we pass through to the
individual tenants.
Our primary cash expenses consist of our property operating expenses, which include: real
estate taxes; repairs and maintenance; management expenses; insurance; utilities; general and
administrative expenses, which include payroll, office expenses, professional fees, acquisition
costs and other administrative expenses; and interest expense, primarily on mortgage loans payable
and our Facility. In addition, we incur non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization on our
properties.
Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 to the Period from February 16, 2010
(Commencement of Operations) to March 31, 2010
Our consolidated results of operations often are not comparable from period to period due to
the impact of property acquisitions. The results of operations of any acquired property are
included in our financial statements as of the date of its acquisition. The majority of the
changes in our statements of operations line items for the three months ended March 31, 2011
compared to the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to March 31, 2010 are
related to property acquisitions that occurred primarily in the second half of 2010.
Revenue. Total revenues increased by approximately $3.4 million, to $3.4 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 from $12,000 for the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement
of operations) to March 31, 2010. This increase is due primarily to property acquisitions during
2010.
Property operating expenses. Property operating expenses increased by approximately $1.5
million to $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $6,000 for the period from
February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to March 31, 2010, respectively. This increase is
due primarily to property acquisitions during 2010.
15
Table of Contents
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased by approximately
$944,000 to $959,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $15,000 for the period from
February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to March 31, 2010, respectively. This increase is
due to property acquisitions during 2010.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased by
approximately $988,000 to $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $620,000 for
the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to March 31, 2010. This increase
was driven by a full quarter of expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to a
partial quarter for the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to March 31,
2010.
Interest expense, including amortization. Interest expense increased by approximately
$365,000 to $368,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $3,000 for the period from
February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to March 31, 2010. This increase is due primarily
to the assumption of $17.9 million in mortgage loans payable during 2010 and Facility financing
costs.
As a result of the above, net loss increased by approximately $549,000 to $1.3 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to a net loss of $757,000 for the period from February
16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to March 31, 2010.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The primary objective of our financing strategy is to maintain financial flexibility with a
conservative capital structure using retained cash flows, long-term debt and the issuance of common
and perpetual preferred stock to finance our growth. Over the long-term, we intend to:
| limit the sum of the outstanding principal amount of our consolidated indebtedness and the liquidation preference of any outstanding perpetual preferred stock to less than 40% of our total enterprise value; | ||
| maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio in excess of 2.0x; | ||
| limit the principal amount of our outstanding floating rate debt to less than 20% of our total consolidated indebtedness; and | ||
| have staggered debt maturities that are aligned to our expected average lease term (5-7 years), positioning us to re-price parts of our capital structure as our rental rates change with market conditions. |
We intend to preserve a flexible capital structure with a long-term goal to obtain an
investment grade rating and be in a position to issue unsecured debt and perpetual preferred stock.
Prior to attaining an investment grade rating, we intend to primarily utilize non-recourse debt
secured by individual properties or pools of properties with a targeted maximum loan-to-value of
60% at the time of financing, or recourse bank term loans and credit facilities. We may also
assume debt in connection with property acquisitions which may have a higher loan-to-value.
We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements generally through net cash provided by
operations, existing cash balances and, if necessary, short-term borrowings under the Facility. We
believe that our net cash provided by
operations will be adequate to fund operating requirements, pay interest on any borrowings and
fund distributions in accordance with the REIT requirements of the federal income tax laws. In the
near-term, we intend to fund future investments in properties with the net proceeds of our initial
public offering and the concurrent private placement and borrowings under our Facility. We expect
to meet our long-term liquidity requirements, including with respect to other investments in
industrial properties, property acquisitions and scheduled debt maturities, through the cash we
have available from our initial public offering and the concurrent private placement and borrowings
under our Facility and periodic issuances of common stock, perpetual preferred stock, and long-term
secured and unsecured debt. The success of our acquisition strategy may depend, in part, on our
ability to obtain and borrow under our Facility and to access additional capital through issuances
of equity and debt securities.
On February 16, 2010, we completed our initial public offering with the issuance of 8,750,000
shares of our common stock at a price of $20.00 per share and a concurrent private placement of
350,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $20.00 per share. The net proceeds were
approximately $169.8 million.
16
Table of Contents
As of March 31, 2011, our market equity capitalization was as follows:
Market Equity Capitalization as of March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Shares | ||||||||||||
Security | Outstanding1 | Market Price 2 | Market Value | |||||||||
Common Stock |
9,290,960 | $ | 17.23 | $ | 160,083,241 |
1 | Includes 134,958 shares of unvested restricted stock | |
2 | Closing price of our shares of common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on March 31, 2011 in dollars per share |
We have an $80.0 million Facility that matures on March 22, 2013. The amount available
under our Facility may be increased up to $150.0 million, subject to the approval of the
administrative agent and the identification of lenders willing to make available additional
amounts. Outstanding borrowings under our Facility are limited to the lesser of $80.0 million or
50% of the value of the borrowing base properties. Interest on our Facility will generally be paid
based upon, at our option, either (i) LIBOR plus the applicable LIBOR margin or (ii) the applicable
base rate which is the greater of the administrative agents prime rate plus 1.00%, 0.50% above the
federal funds effective rate, or thirty-day LIBOR plus the applicable LIBOR margin for LIBOR rate
loans under our Facility. The applicable LIBOR margin will range from 3.00% to 4.25%, depending on
the ratio of our outstanding consolidated indebtedness to the value of our consolidated gross asset
value. Our Facility requires payment of an annual unused facility fee in an amount equal to 0.35%
to 0.50% depending on the unused portion of the Facility. Our unused facility fee was $100,000 and
$0, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and for the period from February 16,
2010 (commencement of operations) to March 31, 2010. Our Facility includes a series of financial
and other covenants that we must comply with in order to borrow under the Facility. We have agreed
to guarantee the obligations of the borrower (a wholly-owned subsidiary) under our Facility. As of
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were no borrowings outstanding and five properties were
in the borrowing base under our Facility. We were in compliance with our financial covenants under
the Facility at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had outstanding mortgage loans payable of
approximately $17.5 million and $17.7 million, respectively, and held cash and cash equivalents
totaling approximately $47.9 million and $57.3 million, respectively.
The following table summarizes our debt maturities, principal payments, capitalization ratios,
EBITDA, interest coverage and debt ratios as of March 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
Mortgage | ||||||||||||
Credit | Loans | |||||||||||
Facility | Payable | Total Debt | ||||||||||
2011 (9 months) |
$ | | $ | 512 | $ | 512 | ||||||
2012 |
| 718 | 718 | |||||||||
2013 |
| 761 | 761 | |||||||||
2014 |
| 806 | 806 | |||||||||
2015 |
| 13,642 | 13,642 | |||||||||
Thereafter |
| 397 | 397 | |||||||||
Subtotal |
| 16,836 | 16,836 | |||||||||
Unamortized net premiums |
| 635 | 635 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | | $ | 17,471 | $ | 17,471 | ||||||
Total Debt-to-Gross Investments in Real Estate 1 |
12.2 | % | ||||||||||
Total Debt-to-Total Market Capitalization 2 |
9.8 | % | ||||||||||
EBITDA 3 |
$ | 372 | ||||||||||
Interest Coverage 4 |
1.0 | x | ||||||||||
Total Debt-to-EBITDA 5 |
11.7 | x | ||||||||||
Weighted Average Interest Rate |
5.2 | % | ||||||||||
Weighted Average Maturity (years) |
4.8 |
17
Table of Contents
1 | Total debt-to-gross investments in real estate is calculated as total debt, including premiums, divided by gross investments in real estate as of March 31, 2011. | |
2 | Total debt-to-total market capitalization is calculated as total debt, including premiums, divided by market equity plus total debt, including premiums, as of March 31, 2011. | |
3 | Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Includes acquisition costs totaling approximately $0.3 million. See Non-GAAP Financial Measures in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a reconciliation of EBITDA from net loss available to common stockholders. | |
4 | Interest coverage is calculated as EBITDA divided by interest expense, including amortization. | |
5 | Total debt-to-EBITDA is calculated as total debt, including premiums, divided by annualized EBITDA. |
On February 17, 2011, our board of directors declared a cash dividend in the amount of $0.10
per share of our common stock payable on April 19, 2011 to stockholders of record as of the close
of business on April 5, 2011. We intend over time to make regular quarterly distributions to
holders of shares of our common stock when, as and if authorized by our board of directors and
declared by us. Our ability to make distributions to our stockholders also will depend on our
levels of retained cash flows, which we intend to use as a source of investment capital.
Sources and Uses of Cash
Our principal sources of cash are cash from operations, borrowings under mortgage loans
payable, draws on our Facility and the net proceeds from our initial public offering of our common
stock and the concurrent private placement. Our principal uses of cash are asset acquisitions,
debt service, capital expenditures, operating costs and corporate overhead costs.
Cash From Operating Activities. Net cash used in operating activities totaled approximately
$0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to approximately $0.6 million for
the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to March 31, 2010. The decrease in
cash used in operating activities is attributable to property acquisitions during 2010 and a full
quarter of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to a partial quarter for
the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to March 31, 2010.
Cash From Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities was $8.7 million and
$12.7 million, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and for the period from
February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to March 31, 2010, which consists primarily of
property acquisitions of $5.8 million and $12.7 million, respectively.
Cash From Financing Activities. Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities was ($0.2
million) and $176.7 million, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and for the
period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to March 31, 2010, which consists
primarily of scheduled debt principal payments for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and $177.1
million in proceeds, net of issuance costs paid of $4.8 million, from our initial public offering
of our common stock and the concurrent private placement and financing fees for the period from
February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to March 31, 2010.
Critical Accounting Policies
A summary of our critical accounting policies is set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2010.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements other than an operating lease for office
space.
Contractual Obligations
The full amount of the underwriting discount in connection with our initial public offering
was approximately $10.5 million. The underwriters agreed to forego the receipt of payment of $0.80
per share, or approximately $7.0 million in the
18
Table of Contents
aggregate, until such time as we purchase assets in
accordance with our investment strategy described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2010 with an aggregate purchase price (including the amount of any outstanding
indebtedness assumed or incurred by us) at least equal to the net proceeds from our initial public
offering (after deducting the full underwriting discount and other estimated offering expenses
payable by us), at which time, we have agreed to pay the underwriters the remainder of the
underwriting discount.
As of May 5, 2011, we had two outstanding contracts with third-party sellers to acquire
industrial properties. There is no assurance that we will acquire the properties under contract
because the proposed acquisitions are subject to a variety of factors, including the satisfaction
of customary closing conditions. The following table summarizes certain information with respect
to the properties we have under contract:
Purchase | ||||||||||||||||
Number of | Price (in | Assumed Debt | ||||||||||||||
Market | Buildings | Square Feet | thousands) | (in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Los Angeles Area |
1 | 27,500 | $ | 4,100 | $ | | ||||||||||
Miami Area |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Northern New Jersey/New York |
1 | 211,500 | 32,600 | 14,769 | ||||||||||||
San Francisco Bay Area |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Seattle Area |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Washington, D.C/Baltimore |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Total/Weighted Average |
2 | 239,000 | $ | 36,700 | $ | 14,769 | ||||||||||
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We use the following non-GAAP financial measures that we believe are useful to investors as a
key measure of our operating performance: funds from operations, or FFO, and earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA. FFO and EBITDA should not be considered
in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance in accordance with GAAP.
We compute FFO in accordance with standards established by the National Association of Real
Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT), which defines FFO as net income (loss) (determined in
accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (losses) from sales of property, plus depreciation and
amortization on real estate assets and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint
ventures (which are calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis). We believe that presenting FFO
provides useful information to investors regarding our operating performance because it is a
measure of our operations without regard to specified non-cash items, such as real estate
depreciation and amortization and gain or loss on sale of assets.
We believe that FFO is a meaningful supplemental measure of our operating performance because
historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that
the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have
historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have
considered the presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost
accounting alone to be insufficient. As a result, we believe that the use of FFO, together with
the required GAAP presentations, provide a more complete understanding of our performance.
The following table reflects the calculation of FFO reconciled from net loss available to
common stockholders for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and for the period from February 16,
2010 (commencement of operations) to March 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands except per share data) :
Period from | ||||||||
February 16, 2010 | ||||||||
For the Three | (Commencement of | |||||||
Months Ended | Operations) to | |||||||
March 31, 2011 | March 31, 2010 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||
Net loss available to common stockholders |
$ | (1,306 | ) | $ | (757 | ) | ||
Depreciation and amortization |
||||||||
Total depreciation and amortization |
959 | 15 | ||||||
Non-real estate depreciation |
(23 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||
Funds from operations |
$ | (370 | ) | $ | (751 | ) | ||
Basic and diluted FFO per common share |
$ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.08 | ) | ||
Weighted average basic and diluted common shares |
9,132,766 | 9,112,000 | ||||||
19
Table of Contents
We compute EBITDA as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and
stock-based compensation. We believe that presenting EBITDA provides useful information to
investors regarding our operating performance because it is a measure of our operations on an
unleveraged basis before the effects of tax, non-cash depreciation and amortization expense,
including stock-based compensation.
The following table reflects the calculation of EBITDA reconciled from net loss available to
common stockholders for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and for the period from February 16,
2010 (commencement of operations) to March 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
Period from | ||||||||
February 16, 2010 | ||||||||
For the Three | (Commencement of | |||||||
Months Ended | Operations) to | |||||||
March 31, 2011 | March 31, 2010 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||
Net loss available to common stockholders |
$ | (1,306 | ) | $ | (757 | ) | ||
Depreciation and amortization |
959 | 15 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
351 | 106 | ||||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
368 | 3 | ||||||
EBITDA |
$ | 372 | $ | (633 | ) | |||
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency
exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market
sensitive instruments. In pursuing our business strategies, the primary market risk which we expect
to be exposed to in the future is interest rate risk. We may be exposed to interest rate changes
primarily as a result of debt used to maintain liquidity, fund capital expenditures and expand our
investment portfolio and operations. We seek to limit the impact of interest rate changes on
earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. We expect that some of our future
outstanding debt will have variable interest rates. We may use interest rate caps to manage our
interest rate risks relating to our variable rate debt. We expect to replace variable rate debt on
a regular basis with fixed rate, long-term debt to finance our assets and operations.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management has evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act), and has concluded
that as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective to give reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the
reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and
forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosures.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter
ended March 31, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
As of March 31, 2011, there were no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company is
a party or of which any of its properties is the subject, the determination of which the Company
anticipates would have a material effect upon its financial condition and results of operations.
20
Table of Contents
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010.
Item 2. Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On February 9, 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared effective the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-163016) in connection with the Companys initial
public offering, pursuant to which the Company registered and sold 8,750,000 shares of the
Companys common stock. The offering was completed on February 16, 2010.
Prior to the full investment of the net offering proceeds in industrial properties, the
Company will continue to invest the net proceeds in interest-bearing short-term U.S. government,
government agency securities and money market accounts, which are consistent with our intention to
qualify as a REIT. As of March 31, 2011, we have used net proceeds to acquire 34 industrial
buildings for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $140.1 million, which includes assumed
mortgage loans payable.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit | ||
Number | Exhibit Description | |
10.1*
|
Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated as of March 31, 2011, between Saw Mill Park, LLC and Terreno Realty LLC. | |
31.1*
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification dated May 5, 2011. | |
31.2*
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification dated May 5, 2011. | |
32.1**
|
18 U.S.C. § 1350 Certification dated May 5, 2011. | |
32.2**
|
18 U.S.C. § 1350 Certification dated May 5, 2011. |
* | Filed herewith. | |
** | Furnished herewith. |
21
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Terreno Realty Corporation |
||||
May 5, 2011 | By: | /s/ W. Blake Baird | ||
W. Blake Baird | ||||
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
May 5, 2011 | By: | /s/ Michael A. Coke | ||
Michael A. Coke | ||||
President and Chief Financial Officer |
22
Table of Contents
Exhibit Index
Exhibit | ||
Number | Exhibit Description | |
10.1*
|
Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated as of March 31, 2011, between Saw Mill Park, LLC and Terreno Realty LLC. | |
31.1*
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification dated May 5, 2011. | |
31.2*
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification dated May 5, 2011. | |
32.1**
|
18 U.S.C. § 1350 Certification dated May 5, 2011. | |
32.2**
|
18 U.S.C. § 1350 Certification dated May 5, 2011. |
* | Filed herewith. | |
** | Furnished herewith. |
23